Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2004 0420 PC REGResolution No. PC- 2004 -458 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY - APRIL 20, 2004 7:00 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: 799 Moorpark Avenue 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Special Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2004. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Commission concerning a Public Hearing or Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the Secretary for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the Community Development Department/ Planning and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the Community Development Department at 517 -6233. S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \AGENDA \2004 \04_0420_pca.doc Planning Commission Agenda April 20, 2004 Page No. 2 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. 2004 -458) A. Consider Conditional Use Permit 2004 -01 to Allow a Warehouse /Distribution Facility in an Existing Building in the M -1 (Industrial Park) Zone, Located at 5316 Kazuko Court, on the Application of Warren Distributina (Assessors Parcel Number 511 -0- 070 -675) Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02, a Request to Amend Chapter 17.74 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Relating to the Development Standards of Specific Plan No. 2; and Residential Planned Development Nos. 2002- 03, -04, and -05, for Construction of a Total of 318 Single- Family Detached Residential Units within Specific Plan No. 2, Located Approximately One -half Mile North of the Northerly Terminus of Spring Road and Three - fourths of One Mile East of Walnut Canyon Road, on the Application of Pardee Homes. (Assessor Parcel Numbers: Portions of 500 -0- 270 -07, 500- 0 -270- 19, 500 -0- 270 -20, 512 -0- 160 -54, 512 -0- 160 -55, and 512- 0- 160 -70, 500 -0- 024 -03) Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -04, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02. 9. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Consider Recommendation to City Council on Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines (Continued from April 6, 2004 Meeting) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. Planning Commission Agenda April 20, 2004 Page No. 3 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (Future agenda items are tentative and are subject to rescheduling.) A. May 4, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting: • Possible Cancellation 11. ADJOURNMENT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to review an agenda or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the Community Development Department at (805) 517 -6233. Upon request, the agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Any request for disability- related modification or accommodation should be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to assist the City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II). ITEM: 6.A. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION Moorpark, California March 24. 2004 A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark was held on March 24, 2004, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the City Council meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Chair Pozza called the Planning Commission to order at 7:08 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Planning Commissioner Mark DiCecco, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter. Planning Commissioners Present: Commissioners DiCecco, Landis, Lauletta, Peskay, and Chair Pozza. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Kenneth Gilbert, Public Works Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Cynthia Borchard, Administrative Services Director; Brad Miller, City Engineer; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. O00001 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Page 2 March 24, 2004 S. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. Staff Recommendation: Consider and discuss Goals and Objectives for FY 2004/2005. Mr. Kueny recommended the Council and Planning Commission focus on the portions of the staff report, which affect the function of the Planning Commission, beginning with Objectives of the Community Development Department on stamped pages 26 -29, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency on stamped pages 34 -35, and then any other areas of interest or concern. Mr. Kueny stated Objectives B.11. and C.13. on stamped page 26 have been completed. Mayor Hunter stated Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners should feel free to make comments or ask questions as this is an informal meeting. Mr. Kueny stated in regard to Objective D.8. on stamped page 27, Council has given direction for items for funding of TSM monies be incorporated into the budget for formal action with $3 million dollars having been generally directed and an additional $2 million dollars to become available in the next 3 -5 years. In response to Chair Pozza, Mr. Hogan stated in regard to Objective D.10., building permits are currently part of a fee update to provide maps for viewing; and in regard to Objective D.15., there is a potential surcharge over certain costs on building permits to be used to provide a fund for advanced planning items such as a Traffic Model Update and for General Plan Amendments. Mr. Kueny stated Objectives F.6. and F.7. on stamped page 27 have been completed; staff is optimistic Objective F.8. on page 28 should be completed by the end of June 2004; Objective G.4. on stamped page 27 and Objective G.11. on stamped page 28 are on hold pending a decision on North Park; actions on DVt. 002 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Paae 3 March 24, 2004 amendments to entitlements on second dwelling units and animal control amendments have been completed for Objective G.16. on stamped page 28; however there are a number of other items still pending. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Gilbert stated for Objective G.9. on stamped page 28, the prognosis is not good for reuse; the former Caltrans yard has been transferred to the State of California Real Estate Division and Caltrans no longer has any incentive to deal with the property; there are on -site environmental issues associated with the property; the State has other priorities due to the budget crisis; and the City will need to keep up pressure to move this item along. In response to Chair Pozza, Mr. Gilbert stated he did not have specifics on the environmental issues. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated if the State decided to market this commercially zoned property the City would be given right-of- first- refusal. In response to Mayor Hunter's recommendation to apply pressure to move this project forward to allow the City to purchase the property or have the State dispose of it appropriately, Mr. Kueny stated it will be moved to a higher priority. Mr. Kueny concluded his remarks on the Community Development portion of the staff report, stating Objective G.17. on stamped page 28 has been completed. Mr. Kueny stated for the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency on stamped page 34 Objective B.9., the site has been acquired; staff is developing initial plans including the closing of Magnolia Street to expand the park area consistent with the goals of the Downtown Specific Plan; and in a few months the preliminary drawings will come to Council Mr. Kueny stated on stamped page 34 for Objective B.12., the Agency recently awarded the contract to prepare the agreement for the 2005 -2009 Five -Year 0CC1003 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Paae 4 March 24, 2004 Implementation Plan Upgrade, which should return to Council within the next nine to twelve months. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Riley stated staff is working with the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce as an independent project on Objective D.2. on stamped page 34; the City has been working with the Economic Development Committee on a contract to publish the marketing brochure; and the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce just recently published their new directory. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Riley stated the committee will be meeting again in early April with plans for the City's marketing brochure to possibly come to Council in May 2004. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Riley stated the Chamber directory pages related to City information are reviewed by City staff prior to publication. In response to Commissioner Landis, Mr. Kueny stated there has been no focus on Objective B.3. on stamped page 34 regarding the installation of landscaping and downtown identification signs at the entrances to High Street, as the Council placed this on the back burner two years ago. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Kueny stated there has been slow progress on entrance signage for the City, which may improve next fiscal year; signage for service clubs is usually kept separate from city monument signs, as demonstrated in the service club signage at the corner of Madera Road and Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Simi Valley. Councilmember Parvin commented on the City of Thousand Oaks' emphasis on signage in recent time; and Mr. Kueny identified the south side of U.S. Highway 101 at Moorpark Road as a good example of this emphasis. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated staff will verify if gas tax TDA monies could be used for this type of signage; but questioned whether this would be the best use of that type of funding. 0eW0(D Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Paae 5 March 24, 2004 In response to Mayor Hunter's request for an update on the fire station, Mr. Riley stated the construction is ahead of schedule and a grand opening is planned for May 12, 2004. He commented on the added feature of old -time fold -back garage doors in place of roll -up doors. Councilmember Mikos stated the grand opening will take place at 6:00 p.m. on May 12, 2004. In response to Mayor Hunter's request for an update on the new police facility, Mr. Riley stated footings for the perimeter walls are being poured; two- thirds of the grading for the building is completed; good progress is being made even though there have been six weather - related delay days; and final completion should be in early April 2005. In response to Mayor Hunter's request for an update on the North Park project, Mr. Hogan stated the Planning Commission has been reviewing the project over the past six months; response to comments on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been completed; the EIR section on traffic was re- circulated and response to those comments has taken place; 28 or more Planning Commission recommended changes have been made after review of the entire Specific Plan, with most, if not all, agreed to by the developer; the last Planning Commission public hearing on this item was continued to April 6, 2004; and the Commission is coming close to putting together their recommendation to the City Council. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Hogan stated staff has had meetings with the Ventura County Fire Protection District in regard to increasing the distance of fuel modification zones, especially in regard to requests made by Serenata Homeowners Association to increase their buffer area; the North Park Homeowners Association, not the individual property owner, will be responsible for maintaining the fuel modification areas for the North Park project; in some locations of high risk, 200 -feet will be the required clearance rather than the normal 100 - feet; and discussions have taken place regarding the various buffer zone distances used in San Diego. Mr. 00(1005 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Page 6 March 24, 2004 Hogan stated an In -Box report concerning the fuel modification zone will be presented to Council within the next month. Councilmember Parvin recommended staff include in the quarterly City Newsletter and Recreation Guide, a reminder to residents of the type of plantings to be avoided in high risk fire zones; and cited the trees, which burned during the recent Simi -Fire at the Villa Del Arroyo Mobile Home Park as an example of what not to plant. Councilmember Mikos recommended the new Landscape Guidelines for the City include a list of fire resistant plantings. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan stated there has bee no work on Objective G.23. on stamped page 28 regarding the preparation of a Specific Plan for the Virginia Colony area. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan stated for Objective G.25 on stamped page 29, the City will be able to report on the inventory of natural open space properties owned by the City and other entities once Phase 1 of the City's GIS project is completed; and by the end of the fiscal year will be able to include the parcel base purchased from the County. In response to Commissioner Lauletta, Mr. Kueny stated in regard to Objective A. 2. on stamped page 24, an update to the City's new website will be previewed in April after the Council's review. In response to Commissioner Lauletta, Mr. Riley stated there will be a specific section of the website devoted to businesses with a one -way crosslink to the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce website. In response to Commissioner Peskay, Mr. Kueny stated the creation of a Master Calendar was referred by Council to the Budget and Finance Committee and will be returning to Council in a report on April 21, 2004; and in regard to Objective A. 3. on stamped page 9, 0U,t300C Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Page 7 March 24, 2004 there are legal restrictions on what programs can be replayed on the City Government Channel. In response to Commissioner Peskay, Mr. Riley stated in regard to Top Ten Priority 5. on stamped page 8, he is a member of a project development committee, which meets with Caltrans, and they are studying the construction of a permanent truck scale facility west of the City; a number of design options have been presented to Caltrans; and most of the millions of dollars in cost for the project will come from the acquisition of property to widen the roadway. Councilmember Millhouse stated the construction of a permanent truck scale is at the top of the priority list in Ventura County; and siting of the project has been delayed due to the lawsuit brought by the City of Somis for the lack of an Environmental Impact Report; and this delay has impacted the determination of how many lanes will be required. In response to Mayor Hunter, Councilmember Millhouse stated it is safe to assume the lanes will be in an east /west direction and in approximately the same location. Mayor Hunter stated he would like to compliment the Planning Commission on their level of analysis in looking at the North Park project over the past six months; he has watched some of the meetings on television and is impressed with the level of detail used to look at the many different components; and the community has been well served by a job well done. Commissioner DiCecco stated the Planning Commission could not have conducted their review without the support of the Community Development Department. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated in regard to Top Ten Priority 9. on stamped page 8, eighteen months ago preliminary work was done to study the acquisition of available open space outside the City limits and that a report will be brought to Council. ©00007 Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Paae 8 March 24, 2004 Councilmember Harper stated consideration should be given to acquiring the remnant piece of property created by the County's new road traversing the greenbelt area, which would be an excellent place to put a City park outside the City limits as its size would preclude development. Councilmember Mikos stated the feasibility of developing a trail system along the Arroyo has already been established; and she recommends noting in Top Ten Priority 9 on stamped page 8, what has been accomplished and what is still needed for the trail system. She invited the Commission to comment on the Top Ten Priorities. Chair Pozza stated he understands the reason for the delay in Top Ten Priority 3. on stamped page 8 due to the size of the North Park project and its impacts; he recommended it be kept as high as possible on the list of priorities, as with all General Plan changes there is a relationship to the Circulation Elements; the City is doing the right thing to develop the City in an organized fashion and continue to keep up with all of the Circulation Elements; and it is important to figure out the hot issue of the truck scale facility in Top Ten Priority 5. on stamped page 8. Commissioner Lauletta stated Top Ten Priority 4., the widening of Los Angeles Avenue is crucial for the City; in Top Ten Priority 8. on stamped page 8, increasing the City's General Fund revenue by attracting businesses should be considered essential for a city trying to preserve quality of life; and that is why he is keen on the City's website identifying programs attractive to businesses. o��COV4d Minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission Moorpark, California Page 9 March 24, 2004 6. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the City Council meeting at 7:45 p.m. Chair Pozza adjourned the Planning Commission Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Scott Pozza, Chair Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk 00(410"a ITEM: 8. A. MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Prepared by: Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner. C DATE: April 7, 2004 (PC Meeting of 4/20/04) SUBJECT: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01 to Allow a Warehouse /Distribution Facility in an Existing Building in the M -1 (Industrial Park) Zone, Located at 5316 Kazuko Court, on the Application of Warren Distributing (Assessors Parcel Number 511 -0- 070 -675) BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION Warren Distributing has submitted a request for a Conditional Use Permit to occupy an existing building as a warehouse and distribution facility for automotive and truck parts. The building, located at 5316 Kazuko Court, is approximately 11,000 square feet in floor area. The application proposes occupancy of the building, including tenant improvements consisting primarily of storage racks. No changes to the exterior of the building are proposed at this time. The Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for warehousing uses in the M -1 or M -2 zones. Project Setting Existing Site Conditions: This building, constructed in 1989, is part of a series of existing industrial buildings that were built in the late 1980's and early 1990's. No enlargement of the building is proposed at this time. This building has been used for assembly of truss and staging structures and most recently as a machine shop. While this light industrial area abuts the Shasta Street (Moorpark Estates) residential neighborhood, access to the area is from Los Angeles Avenue via Goldman Avenue or Maureen Lane. Anticipated typical impacts from a warehouse are associated with on- and off -site circulation, hours of operation and outdoor \ \mor pri sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2004 \ -01 Warren Distributing \Agenda Rpts \040420.Agenda Report.doc 0 00010 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 2 storage. A narrow landscaped buffer exists between the two land uses. Regardless, there have been noise complaints regarding the machine shop from some Shasta Street residents. All three of these issues are discussed in detail in the analysis section of this agenda report. Previous Applications: This building was originally approved in 1988 under Development Plan (DP) 340. A subsequent outdoor equipment enclosure was approved under Permit Adjustment No. 2001 -01. Other than tenant improvements and occupancies, there have been no other approved modifications to the building. General Plan and Zonina Consistencv: The General Plan and Zoning designations of the site anticipate this type of land use. Warehousing and Distribution uses are consistent with the M -1 zone and the Light Industrial (I -1) General Plan Land Use Designation. The I -1 designation is intended to provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical research and business office use in a business park context. Circulation: The site takes access directly from Kazuko Court with a "looped" driveway system that allows larger vehicles to enter and exit without reversing. The applicant has indicated that inbound deliveries are made once a day by a twenty -four foot (24') bob -tail truck and outbound deliveries are made by small pick -up trucks and compact cars. No deliveries are made by tractor /trailers. Issues related to on- and off -site circulation are discussed further in the Analysis section of this report. Parking: Twenty (20) parking spaces are provided on -site. Driveways and backing areas are shared by the abutting and adjacent buildings. 000011 GENERAL PLAN /ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site Light Ind (I -1) M -1 Light Industrial North Light Ind (I -1) M -1 Light Industrial South Light Ind (I -1) M -1 __. _ .......... Light ... Industrial _.. East - .._ Med Density __ ....__ ____ Res (M) _.. _._..... .......... R -1 - - -- Single Family Res - West - -._ Light ------.._ Ind -_- ___.. -- (I -1) ..__ ____._._ M -1 _........ _ -- - ---- Light _.__.. _-..._. Industrial General Plan and Zonina Consistencv: The General Plan and Zoning designations of the site anticipate this type of land use. Warehousing and Distribution uses are consistent with the M -1 zone and the Light Industrial (I -1) General Plan Land Use Designation. The I -1 designation is intended to provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical research and business office use in a business park context. Circulation: The site takes access directly from Kazuko Court with a "looped" driveway system that allows larger vehicles to enter and exit without reversing. The applicant has indicated that inbound deliveries are made once a day by a twenty -four foot (24') bob -tail truck and outbound deliveries are made by small pick -up trucks and compact cars. No deliveries are made by tractor /trailers. Issues related to on- and off -site circulation are discussed further in the Analysis section of this report. Parking: Twenty (20) parking spaces are provided on -site. Driveways and backing areas are shared by the abutting and adjacent buildings. 000011 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 3 There is one ADA Accessible parking parking spaces. No modifications to proposed or anticipated at this time. Loadina Area: space on site and no compact the parking lot striping are Three (3) loading area(s) with loading doors are provided on the south side of the building, easily accessible from the parking and driveway area. These loading areas would not be easily accessible by tractor /trailers; however, no deliveries are proposed to be made by tractor /trailers. Any impacts to the adjacent residential neighborhood would be related to hours of operation and delivery times. This issue is discussed below in the Analysis section. ANALYSIS Issues Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the following areas for Planning Commission consideration in their recommendation to the City Council: • On- and Off -Site Circulation • Outdoor Storage • Hours of Operation On- and Off -Site Circulation: As discussed above, the site takes access directly from Kazuko Court with a "looped" driveway system that allows larger vehicles to enter and exit without reversing. Depending upon the size of delivery vehicles, those vehicles can either turn around using the loading area or continue the "loop" and exit from the opposite driveway. This system limits the number of movements that a vehicle is required to make to exit the site. There is no access from the residential neighborhood to the east, but there is some concern relative to trucks idling while loading and unloading. A Condition of Approval has been added to limit the "idling" time of vehicles to five (5) minutes so that impacts from engine noise and exhaust will be mitigated. Delivery hours will also be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, as discussed below. No deliveries will be permitted on Sunday. The site plan shows an area of landscaping adjacent to an overhead loading door that is proposed to be removed for improved circulation. However, an equivalent amount of landscaping should 000012 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 4 be installed elsewhere on the lot, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Outdoor Storage: It has been staff's experience that warehousing /storage sometime store inventory in the parking and loading areas, affecting not only on -site circulation, but also aesthetics, street parking and creating potential noise impacts upon local neighborhoods. A Condition of Approval has been added prohibiting any outdoor storage. Hours of Operation: Due to the adjacent residential neighborhood, hours of operation are of concern. Hours of operation should be restricted so that the adjacent residential neighborhood is not unnecessarily inconvenienced. To that end, a Condition of Approval has been added restricting the hours of operation. Hours of operation will be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday. No operations will be permitted on Sunday. Findings The following findings are offered for the Conditional Use Permit: A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan and this title, in that Goal 10 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan is to "Encourage a diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed in a compatible manner surrounding land uses; B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development in that the existing and surrounding buildings were developed in anticipation of this type of use. Conditions of Approval have been added to ensure that the proposed project is compatible with the residential uses to the east; C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that Conditions of Approval have been added to mitigate effects of on -site circulation, outdoor storage and to regulate hours of operation; D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare in that the General Plan, Zoning and Industrial Planned Development anticipated this type of use and Conditions of Approval have been added to preserve the residential character of the properties to the east; 0CC1013 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 5 E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located; and F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character in that the existing building and industrial park were designed and developed with attention given to the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: Date Application Deemed Complete: April 3, 2004 Planning Commission Action Deadline: Not Applicable City Council Action Deadline: June 3, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15301 (Class 1. Existing Facilities) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. 000014 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 6 STAFF RECOMONDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site /Floor Plan 3. Draft PC Resolution with Conditions of Approval 000015 City of Moorpark Location Map 0 Planning Division Location: 5316 Kazuko Court (1000 Foot Radius) AVE. REYES ST. iS AVE {g U INTER ST x DIABLO AVE. 0: Q � < w rte} _ < O � W PALOMAR AVE. J 07 LASSE N< Q HERTZ ST. d VE. v o Y_ z m } w z CHA OER CT r ?� , MADA ST. 3 2 - .. W w SIERRA DISCOVERY CT \ EVEREST d [RAVE o o. = co d AVE PC ATTACHMENT 1 City of Moorpark Location Map 0 Planning Division Location: 5316 Kazuko Court (1000 Foot Radius) C'� a IOWNEle 23' -9• 91 =7--j 5316 -` ii KAZUKO L.L.C. O O ,rti� 8' 6� TENANT O G`V © I WARREN DISTRIBUTING �~ 8737 DICE RD SANTA FE 9' -6 a SPRINGS CA 90670 SM KARM Li Y 92' -6 © w ry r- J Q �� a i Z Q 0- COURT 1MVM 3 '302, _ PLANTE I H.C. 77U, tES D N 8 6 s � Q T E T DISTANCE TO NEXT BUILDING *THb M= Ir0 M� r 111L• a «.. r. IIIOJ IO O CI PLAN VIEWS ATTACHMENT 2 S - TREE FIRE RISER ® el C'� a RESOLUTION NO. PC -2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004 -04 TO ALLOW A WAREHOUSE /DISTRIBUTION FACILITY IN AN EXISTING BUILDING IN THE M -1 (INDUSTRIAL PARK) ZONE, LOCATED AT 5316 KAZUKO COURT, ON THE APPLICATION OF WARREN DISTRIBUTING (ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 511 -0- 070 -675) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission considered Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2004 -04 on the application of Warren Distributing to allow a warehouse /distribution facility in an existing building in the M -1 (Industrial Park) zone, located at 5316 Kazuko Court. (Assessor Parcel No. 511 -0- 070 -675); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 20, 2004 the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; and on April 20, 2004 reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 as a Class 1 exemption for Existing Facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the city's general plan, and any applicable specific plan and this title in that Goal 10 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan is to "Encourage a diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed in a compatible manner surrounding land uses.; \ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2004 \ -01 Warren Distributing\Reso- Cond\040420.Reso.doc PC ATTACHMENT 3 00001S Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 2 B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development in that the existing and surrounding buildings were developed in anticipation of this type of use. Conditions of approval have been added to ensure that the proposed project is compatible with the residential uses to the east; C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that conditions of approval have been added to mitigate effects of on -site circulation and outdoor storage and to regulate hours of operation; D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare in that the general plan, zoning and industrial planned development anticipated this type of use and conditions of approval have been added to preserve the residential character of the properties to the east; E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located; and F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character in that the existing building and industrial park were designed and developed with attention given to the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties. SECTION 2. PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission recommends to the Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -04 Conditions of Approval included in Exh of Approval), attached hereto and reference. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF Development Director shall certify resolution and shall cause a certified the book of original resolutions. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approval of subject to the special ibit A (Special Conditions incorporated herein by ADOPTION: The Community to the adoption of this resolution to be filed in Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 3 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2004. Scott Pozza, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval 00C0zo Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 4 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004 -01 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2004 -01, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 3. Approval of a Zoning Clearance shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. All other permit and fee requirements must be met. 4. All exterior areas of the site, including parking areas under use by the facility, shall be maintained free of litter and debris at all times. 5. Operation and delivery hours will be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday. No operations or deliveries will be permitted on Sunday. 6. The "idling" time of delivery vehicles shall not exceed five (5) minutes. 7. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 8. All landscaping shall be irrigated and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free of weeds, trash and debris. 9. All exterior signs shall be under separate permit. 10. Exterior of building to be cleaned and repainted, where necessary. 11. Should it be necessary to re- stripe the parking lot and remove any landscaped planters, an equivalent amount of landscaping shall be installed elsewhere on the lot, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 00002:. TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Honorable Planning Commission Barry R. Hogan, Community Prepared by: Scott Wolfe, ITEM: 8.11. Development Directo Principal Planner April 9, 2004 (PC Meeting of 4/20/04) SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02, a Request to Amend Chapter 17.74 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Relating to the Development Standards of Specific Plan No. 2; and Residential Planned Development Nos. 2002 -03, -04, and -05, for Construction of a Total of 318 Single - Family Detached Residential Units within Specific Plan No. 2, Located Approximately One -half Mile North of the Northerly Terminus of Spring Road and Three - fourths of One Mile East of Walnut Canyon Road, on the Application of Pardee Homes. (Assessor Parcel Numbers: Portions of 500 -0- 270 -07, 500 -0- 270 -19, 500 -0- 270 -20, 512 -0- 160 -54, 512 -0- 160 -55, and 512 -0- 160 -70, 500- 0 -024- 03) BACKGROUND In 1995, Morri son- Fountainwood- Agoura submitted applications for the development of Specific Plan Area No. 2. These applications included the request for approval of the Specific Plan, as well as, a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a Development Agreement. The Specific Plan and accompanying applications were approved on September 15, 1999. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5045, which included the entire Specific Plan area, was approved on August 2, 2000. In April of 2001, Pardee Homes entered an agreement to purchase the property from Morrison - Fountainwood- Agoura. In February of 2002, Pardee Homes submitted an application for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and for approval of the Residential Planned Development Permits for Planning Areas 1 -4. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2002 \03 Pardee \Agenda Rpts \PC Agenda Report.doc () e1 c h 2 2 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Setting Existing Site Conditions: The subject property consists of 445 acres of land within the approved Specific Plan Area No. 2, located north of the existing northerly terminus of Spring Road, and approximately one -half mile east of Walnut Canyon Road. The site is currently vacant. Several types of plant communities previously covered the site until the October 2003, wildfires burnt most of the existing vegetation on the property. The site is generally in a natural state, with only a few utility lines and crude dirt roads crossing the site. Previous Applications: Specific Plan No. 2 was approved in September of 1999. The Specific Plan identified the project area and established overall development patterns for 570 residential units in neighborhoods of varying densities, a public school site, a public park site, numerous areas of public and private open space, and an area set aside as a habitat preserve for the coastal sage scrub community which currently exists on -site. Along with the Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map No. 5045 was approved, which established the proposed subdivision of the subject property. In December of 2003, the Community Development Director approved a Permit Adjustment for the Tentative Tract 5045, making minor adjustments to the street pattern and slightly reducing the number of residential units within the Specific Plan area to 552. In January of 2004, the City Council approved a Modification to Tentative Tract 5045, allowing the installation of gates to the entries to each of the individual neighborhoods within the Tract, and allowing the private maintenance of neighborhood streets within the Tract. GENERAL PLAN /ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site SP 2 SP Vacant North OS (County) OS Agricultural (County) Medium Low Single Family South Density R -1 Residential Residential (ML) Low Density Single Family East Residential (L) RPD /OS Residential/ Vacant OS /Medium Vacant /Waterworks West Density OS /RE District/ SFR Residential OCIICOZ3 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 3 General Plan and Zoning Consistency: The Specific Plan, as adopted, is consistent with the adopted General Plan of the City of Moorpark. The individual land use designations within the Specific Plan area serve as the designations of the General Plan Land Use Element would. There are no proposed changes to these designations, nor are there any proposals within the proposed projects which would result in an inconsistency with the Land Use designations. The Specific Plan also adopted development standards, incorporated as a chapter of the Zoning Ordinance, which identified specific requirements for the development of the various Planning Areas within the Specific Plan. The Zoning Ordinance Amendment proposes changes to this chapter of the Municipal Code. The proposed changes are as follows: Planning Area 1: 1. Allow for increased flexibility in front yard setbacks (with reductions to a minimum of fifteen [15'] feet from the currently required twenty [20'] feet) if the living space is forward of the garage door to produce a more varied streetscape. Additionally, front yard setbacks for any three consecutive lots, shall vary the front setback a minimum of three (3') feet from lot to lot. 2. Rear yard setback is changed from the currently required twenty (20') feet to the standard R -1 setback of fifteen (15') feet. 3. A requirement to give the same architectural treatment to all eave and windows and other features on all sides of a structure, as are found on the front elevation, is proposed to be changed to require the architectural treatment on the sides to be complimentary to the treatments on the front elevation. Plannina Areas 2, 3, and 4: 1. Allow for increased flexibility in front yard setbacks (with reductions to a minimum of fifteen [15'] feet) if specific architectural features are utilized to produce a more varied streetscape. Approved architectural features would include: • Living space is forward (closer to the street) of the garage door; • swing garages with the opening facing the side lot line; Off' 024 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 4 • products that incorporate porte cocheres or other architectural features that screen at least a portion of the garage doors from the street; or • as approved by the Community Development Director. Additionally, front yard setbacks for any three consecutive lots shall vary the setback by a minimum of three (3') feet from lot to lot. 2. Side yard setbacks minimums for all interior lots shall be seven and one -half (7.5') feet with a minimum separation between structures of fifteen (15') feet. This would be an increase in setbacks for lots smaller than 7,000 square feet. 3. An allowance is made for the use of tandem parking (i.e. end to end) for the third space within garages. 4. A requirement to give the same architectural treatment to all eave and windows and other features on all sides of a structure, as are found on the front elevation, is to be changed to require the architectural treatment on the sides to be complimentary to the treatments on the front elevation. 5. Given the recent adoption of Solar Energy Design Standards by the City Council, staff is recommending, although the applicant has not requested, the removal of a prohibition of the placement of solar panels on front elevations visible from public streets. State law pre -empts the City's ability to regulate the placement of these facilities in this manner. Project Summary The proposed Residential Planned Development projects address the architecture and plotting of units for Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, and 4. Planning Areas 5, 8, and 9 will be addressed as future requests. RPD NO. Acres Planning Area Number of Units Average Lot Size Range of Unit Size 02 -03 17.8 1 95 5,294 sf 2,112 sf to 2,566 sf 02 -04 17.7 2 69 8,601 sf 2,609 sf to 3,116 sf 02 -04 20.7 3 76 8,941 sf 2,609 sf to 3,116 sf 02 -05 24.7 4 78 9,840 sf 3,083 sf to 3,763 sf 000O25 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 5 Proposed Project Architecture: Planning Area 1 - The proposed homes range in size from 2,112 to 2,566 square feet. There are three different plans proposed, with all being two -story units, although Plan 1 appears to be a single - story unit from the street. Plan 1 (a 2,112 square -foot plan) will offer two bedrooms and two bathrooms, with an optional third bedroom in place of a bonus room. Plan 2 (a 2,276 square -foot plan) will offer three bedrooms and two and one -half bathrooms with options for another bathroom and up to two more bedrooms. Plan 3 (a 2,566 square -foot plan) will offer four bedrooms and between two and one -half and four bathrooms. The buildings conform to the maximum building heights within the RPD zone (the tallest unit is a maximum of 2510" high), and the arrangement of homes will be monitored to ensure an open "feel" to the neighborhood with a varied streetscape. Each of the three product types will be built with one of three different architectural vocabularies: Cottage /Craftsman, Italian or Early Californian. Each architectural style will be utilized in at least 250 of the homes to be built. Each architectural style will have three color /material schemes, especially selected to accentuate the style. Between the variety of floor plans with added room options (5), architectural styles (3), and color schemes (3), there will be forty -five (45) combinations available. The ability to reverse floor plans to optimize placement on a lot offers ninety (90) possible configurations of products within a development of 95 units. This should result in a neighborhood of compatible homes but lacking the repetition often found in residential tract homes. Planning Areas 2 & 3 - The proposed homes range in size from 2,609 to 3,116 square feet. There are three different plans proposed, with all being two -story units, although Plan 1 also appears to be a single -story unit from the street. Plan 1 (a 2,609 square -foot plan) will offer three bedrooms and three and one -half bathrooms, with an optional fourth bedroom in place of a loft. Plan 2 (a 2,900 square -foot plan) will offer five bedrooms and three bathrooms. Plan 3 (a 3,116 square -foot plan) will offer five bedrooms and four bathrooms. The buildings conform to the maximum building heights within the RPD zone (the tallest unit is 30'1" high at its highest point), and the arrangement of homes will be monitored to ensure an open "feel" to the neighborhood with a varied streetscape. 0U�COZG Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 6 Each of the three product types will be built with one of four different architectural vocabularies: French, Italian, Spanish, or Traditional. Examples of these styles are attached. Each architectural style will be utilized in at least 200 of the homes to be built. Each architectural style will have three color /material schemes, especially selected to accentuate the style. Between the variety of elevations with added room options (4), architectural styles (4), and color schemes (3), there will be forty -eight (48) combinations available. The ability to reverse floor plans to optimize placement on a lot offers ninety -six (96) possible configurations of products within a development of one hundred - forty -five (145) units. This should result in a neighborhood of compatible homes but lacking the repetition often found in residential tract homes. Planning Area 4 - The proposed homes range in size from 3,083 to 3,763 square feet. There are three different plans proposed, with one being a one -story unit and two being two -story units. Plan 1 (a 3,083 square -foot plan) will offer three bedrooms and three bathrooms, with an optional fourth and fifth bedrooms in place of a den and office. Plan 2 (a 3,554 square -foot plan) will offer three bedrooms and three and one -half bathrooms, with optional fourth bedroom and an additional bath in place of a bonus room, and an optional fifth bedroom in place of an exercise room. Plan 3 (a 3,763 square -foot plan) will offer five bedrooms and four and one - half bathrooms. The buildings conform to the maximum building heights within the RPD zone (the tallest unit is 27'10" high at its highest point), and the arrangement of homes will be monitored to ensure an open "feel" to the neighborhood with a varied streetscape. Each of the three product types will be built with one of four different architectural vocabularies: Early Californian, Italian, Traditional, or Monterrey. Examples of these styles are attached. Each architectural style will be utilized in at least 200 of the homes to be built. Each architectural style will have three color /material schemes, especially selected to accentuate the style. Between the variety of elevations with added window elevation options (7), architectural styles (4), and color schemes (3), there will be eighty -four (84) combinations available. The ability to reverse floor plans to optimize placement on a lot offers one - hundred - sixty -eight (168) possible configurations of products within a development of seventy -eight (78) units. This should result in a neighborhood of compatible homes but lacking the repetition often found in residential tract homes. 00002'7 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 7 Setbacks: Although the project setbacks meet or exceed the current standards for single - family, detached residential development on all of its lots, except in the case of front yard setbacks, they do not meet the setbacks established for Specific Plan No. 2. Front yard setbacks as proposed are typically at the minimum of twenty (20') feet, although there are instances where the house may extend into the setback area up to a maximum of five (5') feet if certain architectural amenities are provided. The requested Zoning Ordinance Amendment addresses reduction in front, side and rear yard setbacks as established for Specific Plan No 2. This issue is discussed further in the Analysis section below. Parking: The project proposal meets the minimum requirements for off - street parking, but includes a request for tandem parking within the garage areas. This issue is discussed further in the Analysis section below. Circulation: The project's circulation system is proposed to consist of private streets within a gated community. While meeting City street standards, the use and maintenance of these streets would be limited to residents and invited guests. Automatic gates would restrict access to the project. Access to and from the project would be primarily taken from "A" Street, a proposed public arterial street through the center of the Specific Plan area, which will connect to the future extension of Spring Street as proposed within Specific Plan No. 2. ANALYSIS Issues As the subdivision for this project has been previously approved, many of the issues associated with this development have been resolved. However, the development of the subdivision, including architectural design, building plotting, and other design standards, are appropriately addressed at this stage. Staff analysis of the proposed amended project has identified the following areas for Planning Commission consideration in their recommendation to the City Council: • Reduced Front Yard Setbacks • Reduced Side and Rear Setbacks OUCO28 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 8 • Allowance for Tandem Parkin Reduced Front Yard Setbacks: The typical required front yard setbacks within the planning areas of the Specific Plan ranges from a minimum of twenty (201) feet in the areas with small to moderately sized lots, up to thirty -five (35') feet in areas with larger lots. The function of these setbacks is to ensure adequate sight distances from the front yards and driveways entering the street, as well as, to give an open, spacious feel to the neighborhood. Reductions in front yard setback down to a minimum of fifteen (15') feet are proposed to be permitted in the various planning areas with single- family detached homes, provided that the developer provides at least one of a variety of design elements for each lot for which setbacks are to be reduced. These design elements include: • Living space forward of (closer to the street) the garage door; • swing garages of either 90° or 180 °, with the entrance facing either the side or rear property lines; • garages in the rear, even if facing forward, such as courtyard style homes; • products that incorporate porte cocheres, detached "casitas" (flex space), or other architectural features that screen garage doors from the street; or • as approved by the Community Development Director. The goal of allowing these reductions in setback is to provide a varied streetscape and to encourage the use of designs which move the parking area further to the rear of the lot or screen the parking area behind the house or as a detached architectural feature. This "cleans up" the visual aspect of the neighborhood by reducing the visibility of parked cars in the neighborhood. As the lot sizes decrease, the design features available to the developer to take advantage of the reduced setback decrease as well, with only the placement of living area forward of the garage door being suitable for the lots in Planning Area 1. In an effort to discourage the appearance of a "flat" streetscape and to avoid the abuse of the provisions allowing for reduced setbacks, the developer will be required to vary the setbacks on homes. Two adjacent homes may have the same setback but the third 0 C} C 0 2 9 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 9 consecutive lot must vary the front setback by at least three (3') feet. Side and Rear Yard Setbacks: The requests for reductions in side and rear yard are driven more by market demand than by design. The demand for larger homes has prompted Pardee to seek changes to these setbacks. While the requests often result in reduced setbacks, they will frequently also result in an increased setback on an adjacent lot, due to building separation requirements. The goal of these requests is to allow greater flexibility with the placement of houses on the lots, while maintaining the desired spaciousness of the neighborhood and avoiding a "solid" or cluttered appearance between homes. A reduction in rear yard setbacks will have the effect of reducing private usable open space. While the reduced setbacks are not out of character with what has been built in the rest of the City, staff wants to ensure that the utility of these rear yard areas for recreational activities is not altogether eliminated. In most cases, the yards will be too small to accommodate a swimming pool. However, other typical backyard activities (child play area, BBQ, spa, etc.) can be undertaken in these areas, even with reduced setbacks. To facilitate these uses and to allow for ease of permit processing for future homeowners, staff has suggested a condition which will require the applicant to provide plans for patio covers for each floor plan. These would be approved before construction, and could be built as an option to the home buyers before they move in or could be added following move -in, eliminating the need of the individual homeowner to develop new plans for submittal and reducing the time necessary for plan check and permit issuance. Allowance for Tandem Parking: Tandem parking is a configuration in which vehicles are parked end to end, rather than side by side. This type of parking is generally not permitted to provide required parking but is occasionally allowed to provide parking space in excess of required minimums. The reason that tandem parking is not generally allowed is that the vehicle in one tandem space cannot move without the removal of the vehicle in the other tandem space. Realistically, this relegates one tandem space to vehicular storage, rather than active parking or requires extra effort and cooperation on the part of the vehicle users. The Specific Plan establishes Municipal Code Chapter 17.32 as the requirements for parking within these planning areas. This chapter requires two garage spaces per single- family residence. The OU�030 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 10 applicant is requesting the allowance for tandem parking within these planning areas to allow for a third parking space, which is beyond the minimum required parking. As this request does not affect the minimum required parking for the project, and instead provides additional space which may be used for parking, staff finds the applicant's request for the allowance of tandem spaces in keeping with the intent of the Moorpark Highlands Specific Plan and the Municipal Code. Findings The following findings are proposed for the Residential Planned Development Permits: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed project will provide for the orderly development of land identified in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as appropriate for residential development. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development, in that the surrounding development will include a variety of single- family detached and possibly attached homes including some homes which are affordable to moderate, low and very low income families. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the use proposed is similar to uses existing or proposed to the south and west, and access to or utility of those adjacent uses are not hindered by this project. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that adequate provision of public access, sanitary services, and emergency services have been ensured prior to the processing of this request. S. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located, in that the existing and planned land uses in the general area are generally single- family, detached residential uses, recreational uses, and the Waterworks facility, which will be sufficiently separated from this project to avoid impacts. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of OU 0,031 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 11 conflicting character, in that the proposed project complies with all development standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and the development will utilize high quality architectural materials and treatments to enhance the visual appeal of the structures to be constructed. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) . However, since a Zoning Ordinance Amendment accompanying the Residential Planned Development Permits is a legislative act which must be approved before the RPD permits can be approved, the various time limits do not apply to these projects until the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is approved or the applicant revises the applications so that the Amendment is not required to approve the RPD permit requests. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. 0f.nC032 Honorable Planning Commission April 20, 2004 Page 12 An Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 96041030) has been prepared and certified for this project. No new information or impacts that require preparation of a new or subsequent EIR have been identified as a result of any proposed modification to the project. The Community Development Director has determined that the projects are consistent with the EIR prepared for Specific Plan No. 2. STAFF RECObMNDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. Council conditional Development Permit Development Permit Development Permit No. No. 2002 -02. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Project Exhibits PC -2004- recommending to the City approval of Residential Planned No. 2002 -03, Residential Planned No. 2002 -04, Residential Planned 2002 -05, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment A. Site Plan B. Floor plans and elevations 3. Draft PC Resolution for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002- 04; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05; and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02. 4. Excerpt from Chapter 17.74 of Moorpark Municipal Code (Existing) 0c, CIO 33 City of Moorpark PC ATTACHMENT 1 LEGEND Planning Division Location Map Pardee Site Location: East of Walnut Canyon Road 0(,1 C 03 4 1 �n N, P, �6 J, K City of Moorpark PC ATTACHMENT 1 LEGEND Planning Division Location Map Pardee Site Location: East of Walnut Canyon Road 0(,1 C 03 4 1 s \se\6 zda ON\(2)S SY 1� C.� CA v w► Supplemental Architectural Exhibits Moorpark Highlands Tract Number 5045 Specific Plan Number 2 Moorpark, CA Prepared for: Pardee Homes 10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, California 90024 310.475.3525 10 February. 2001 Prepared by: Bassenian Lagoni Architects 2031 Orchard Drive, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.553.9100 PC ATTACHMENT 2 —B BEDRM 2 • it R BONUS ROOM/ .i OPT. BED 3 n �- OPT BEDRM 3 Sao- - I 3'd. OPRONAL LAM OREAT ROOM M BATH W ✓•Y DEN :s I- GAXAG OPTIONAL DEN LL asr.. UU 4 PLAN 1 2.112 S.F. (REVISED T EN TATTVE MAP) 94S U4M Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K t�l ABOCbf.G10R� 03 i 8 -23-02 A U -F -- R - - I.G F r' D 9 —V ...K -H.2 i(lX4) . EARLY CALIFORNIA 4 Pardee Homes lauo NnsfD�e sLw. furrz �foo Loe o+m 1310) . a vomf i �TSVxf �M PLAN 1 ELEVATION A (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8 27 -02 oJln ROOF PLAN_ -- -- - 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO MArLIW; w mNallllE f-lIIt s. vur cYl+ane raa C M.'llRluNlfBVfrYai I. mvoem r.Arta rwD� o. srvccv H Sf OVpI- t. NOOO SlM 3 1. esTaldl smao nwnY sowwl C HOOD IAIOA L COLUWJS w 6ipr! V�1®1 N. fWCL VQ! ®l O mIIDILf I MOOO gIflm) O Stucco gl]M1J ti f6Cf10NAL GAllAOl DOOMS f DEOOIIAITVC I(IIS HOOD 4LLD+O l' OIL !Y W V ■�L -o _I ) - B - -U . F - - -R —I.G r- M –O 'J. 2.H (IXAI >I COTTAGE / CRAFTSMAN ri Pardee Homes �oBBO Mna'mu u.w. fvrra �sao l9] A1'OII13. G VBB)� nom �Tfofb .1 T' a PLAN 1 ELEVATION B (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8 -23 -02 ®o��m 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO wfTefuus A OONOICIE STBP B. PLAT OOIICRiIY T62 P. PAO®RAP1171 TA O. lRIOCV K !fl)COb OVR lO.UI TRQI L MOOD SIIIIi'IIJf B�cTnuOw fB�Bao �uBnT w„Bn� [. MOOO IAfC1A N. BNOCVWB4A O. COIIBBLS t MOOD tOraRll Q. SNCCO PO13MIIl A. fBCIfON�L.OARAOB OOOBS f. OBCOMTM IP.! T. MOOp RAOLq O. cHDAD T CJJ v R1ICLf3 ti A --u - K, --R —1,G .c —I. -A -,Q ITALIAN LEFT PLAN I ELEVATION C (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) Pardee Homes MOORPARK P A - 1 . . .............. 8 23 02 ROOF PLAN I BASE STUCCO L.2: ACCENT STUCCO a, RAT Cxwc 1 C. D. r OM O. JiS1CCV A.FM 1� T MOOD MDl110 O. CfO.OV[YC v. IIJli1W FLOOR ADDENDA GAP-AGE rnR LAU EM FLOOR ADDENDA B 041 PLAN I Pardee Home OtEMED TENTATWE MAP) _s I�WR�=NL S�IM MOORPARK P A 1 - S-Z3-02 041 OPTIONAL BELDAM 4 BATH 3 OPT. DECX LOFT ET NI BEIIRM JNL BATH OPTIONAL LOFT • t- OPTIONAL 173 SP. BE33n2 BA. 1p iy os II f 0 JL BELDAM 3 RE33 LAU BEDROOM 5 AT ELEVATION 2C 157 S.F. %F V ; NOOK,. -T— HOBBY WORKSHgJ 'c -- ROOM FAMILY OPTIONAL HOBBY ROOM ♦ 164 S.F+ PDR GARAGE DEN/PARLOR OPT. BELDAM 4 ------------ PLAN 2 2,276 SP. 2433 SQYr. W/ BEDROOM 5 (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) Pardee Homes MOORPARK LACC" -2 PA- 1 �j mfolly —A --H V .-I —F 2. H (2x4) EARLY CALIFORNIA 3. Pardee Homes Los ANOn.ns, u soon PLAN 2 ELEVATION A (REVISED TENTATIVE M") M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8­3 02 Q - —u YYAt N, 74) ........... ROOF PLAN 1. BASH STUCCO ACCENT STUCC ■ PUT C­C I O. fNCCO K SNCLV0� m TRd L. COLULMf O. I. HOOD 10'1■HaF O. TRICCT)POTfMIIJ s T V C" v. 11■msS akSS24AN LT '10 ,CR ,13 R -B -H - J -O 1 I K -- 21H -M -U COTTAGE / CRAFTSMAN - F= ��- 'xr..taD,'• .:`1 -1i, •}- = T�-=.rJ.4:i;731� -.x� : Pardee Homes IOMO I . 11piIR 1Y00 LADS AJXES. G VOp24 olm.isas2s PLAN 2 ELEVATION B (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1' 9.23 02 auol I.e -. 4 ROOF PLAN 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENTSTUCCO MAT6IUAI>f: w cpNalcn a-T6s s. etwr coroar�n t>u C. MIMIGM SIIt.T191! o. 6cupco k S1VCL9 pVQ lOAM iIIDa L Hopp fMlIT1016 1 BXIlOUORfmp1004MOY WMD1 K WOOD IASCIA L pp1.01pI� o. LW 83 P. WOOD lbl]WL Q. STl1CLb lUTS1mI n ucn -onrRwoe pooas a. pecr>wwme rues T. W -RwaPq c. ama+er w v vm6s O -1 4 C� d ITALIAN - -A -- R - -I - F D —C -Q-L - -U 1 Pardee Homes 10le0 .FRJImI..LYD. ! DR. ,900 1.03 7 (3- 3.G90O]/ <�Im Guam PLAN 2 ELEVATION C (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8 2) -02 msail�e - ................ ........... ROOF FLAN .�T_.__... 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT SNCCO Nuitsws. 1.. canal.n sr>u e. nwr conosl[rnl< c. xv1utGt2 slllrntmu D PION 6 D.f[MlAliv! V Wi F W06eD RAlfLI TA O S1VCC0 M. SiVLCOOVeIt IbAM lllOt t MOOD DRRi103 1. ®TIWOO. fe>pX10iAeDY e0AeD/ K WOOD Fw3Ciw L OOI.U\WS ML Sf0r2 VW ®t N. eII1CK Vpi ®I O. WeeLLi F MOOD FOrSNIIJ Q f'IVCCO FOTSW1l R SLIfONAL OARAOl DOOMS 3. D.L41AlTY. �i i. A'om RAII,pq L. 00)OaCY W v MQSS a�s�nN t�� SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA B *BPD . . OAAAOIS PLAN • . ETYfiti'� r -�- - T - 0WIMED TMTATM M O O R P MAP) A R K L �. �...G,�.. A L____ P��/� +s1f11 C FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA B WSMAN - -. F7=: � -'0 4 —G PLAN 2 Pardee Homes 0WIMED TMTATM M O O R P MAP) A R K �. �...G,�.. A 1 P��/� +s1f11 P - &21-02 aao� iu WSMAN - -. F7=: � -'0 4 —G SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA C GARAGE P°R DEN CRY \ { PARLOR � . B ®RM♦ Iy u?. d FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA C PLAN 2 Pardee Homes OtEVISED TENTA WE MAY) M O O R P A R K p,m wsnn 8 -23-02 aoo„s WSMAN f 1.0 ,� --j . OPTIONAL LOFT. .- - - 77 77 BEDRM 6 ex �s LL- BEDRM 6 AT ELEV. 'C' --OfMONA.L BAY F- - NOOK 93TCMW 7. PAX43LY 77%ORKSHOP 0 t • LIVING GARAGE ..e ..2a Q BA 3 DEN orr. ---------------- W ! —5 Ij e­t ERM D 5 PLAN 3 2,5M S.F. Pardee Homes W/ BMMM 6 0". 2,M S.F. (REVISED 7ZNTA77W MAP) LACC" MOORPARK '048 PA- 1 8-23-M -R —0 A - T .--F K —s 2. H (IX4) I- u • It'. 112,w! EARLY CALIFORNIA I 4D PEAR Pardee Homes PANO .L .E! M 7.1 PLAN 3 ELEVATION A (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 ROOF PLAN 1. DASH STUCCO I AC9NT STUCCO t. wood sxvtT>47s O co-- WOOD lOHN[LP LAca4 yy ti R - I P K �O B -M 2,H —1 U (1X4) COTTAGE / CRAFTSMAN All , LEFT RIGHT Pardee Homes lofao wns.mle el.w. sxm>! Ivoo LOf A1WHAf. G 900:A �UIO).Tl.ssxs i 1 i PLAN 3 ELEVATION B (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8.21 -02 O3I 011ri • 1. BASE STUCCO 3. ACCENT STUCCO , J MATAOAIS D D1DH 6 OlCQA F PJOOflI O 3N000 E%TDIIOR fmMO OIMDY f10ARD1 R wYJOD IAfCIA L CYYUI.Oxf K SIV1.! VBJ ®t N fRICR Y0� ®l O Cl RLHJ R. wo Fo� Q. anlcoD rontiar R. fllCllONAI OARAOl DOOMS f. O®CVlAT1V! R61 T. gOOD RAO.P10 '. Qm.IHLY W V. RBQ35 rLr r sir 4. -A -D -R --K -2,H --Q '-Q U (IX4) rrA.LIAN Pardee Homes 1.06 AxOf1l�. G 9001a JA I I 1p-r,. FLIGHT PLAN 3 ELEVATION C (REVISED TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A - 1 8 23-02 ROOF PLAN 1 BASE STUCCO 2� ACCENT STUCCO .AT77OAL5 A. CONOO!fY3T I R T D. OICH E F M p. STUCCO f'O•a103) f. DecTaiAme roes u. ooY.derw LIC4C" SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA B GARAGE Y, BA. 3 DEN OFT. EDRM T-- FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA. PLAN 3 Pardee Homes- (REVISED MWrAnVE MAP) MOORPARK P A 8-23-02 �,Ix B - bkssuqm I 4 AMU u II PA 2 BE33 6 BED_ �4 SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA GARAOB ISY -C BA. 3 DEN / OPT. !ED 5 FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA C -Or PLAN 3 Pardee Homes OMVISFM TENTATIVE MAP) M O O R P A R K P A 1 - 8-23-02 _.0 -Or BEDRM 4 _3 LOFT _ K BA d1 �J Pardee Homes rw•o wbvmtn races. avrtn rwo l.Qt ANOBEf. G R1D3a arm •+snn PLAN 1 ±2,303 S . F . (2,609 S.F. W/ LOFT) M O O R P A R K PA -2/3 07 -11-02 msoi�n i .. NOOK fir. _ _ • __ . t Knrue r i ]et VEN.O .._ M BATH /i, 9' DEN/ OFT. BEDRM4 . £N711Y' A ..- BA. / .� ARAOE O 1. I •X BEDRM 2 . &RAOE 4 a Pardee Homes rw•o wbvmtn races. avrtn rwo l.Qt ANOBEf. G R1D3a arm •+snn PLAN 1 ±2,303 S . F . (2,609 S.F. W/ LOFT) M O O R P A R K PA -2/3 07 -11-02 msoi�n ADDENDA C ADDENDA g �00J�! PLAN 1 M O O R P A R K Pardee Homes -- PA -2/3 �oqo rueimu �iw. amn i9oo Ip At10e �• GMVJ� 07 -114)2 wm nsssv mso��n �00J�! REAR t4 Y . LEFT r. . t^FL.`:•,'�;•nak'7•-rti;..+i A- T'. ^V. �;•.�r�(.�-r.�. jiaa f. �}_..,-.1. "': v�::' END PLAN 1 ELEVATION A Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K -- - PA -2/3 I.O! ANOm2.. G i00]. Olq a >3Jf2f 7 -111ii oL�o„n i j - 1 1 • - I ROOF PLAN 1. DAM TMCCO 22AACC@R' M COO MATSIALS G NI11D1.wNE W VR�] D. RQI 6 D.CgtATIV. VpT !. Q!U ®IIARy{TACJ O. vfO k fIVCCO WmIPOAM T.YI L 1'OCO I/R/IT1AU ,. 4T�10..m.Q OIMDT.OA.DI C �►ASM L O'L NM K .IO,O,v N. ..IOL YmODit O. COR.A1 !. 10W �OILm) Q..>UOpO>�r .. s.COO,A OA.AO. DOtf. L D.L�.ATfV.lO.[ T. ,lWD.A6aQ U. O@4RY W ..cs" 6�s�rtnrr -- AM Al, REAR -MIRA �D D_M �;A LEFT R N IR, p RIGHT Pardee Homes IDpO T1{�E RVD. 1,,,,. 1,00 1.0! AHORJl, G ypp1. OIp1.,f Jfi, PLAN I ELEVATION B M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7.11-02 nisei In I ;I ROOF PLAN v T 1 1. EASE Stucco 2. Accffirr STUCCO) wATSluu: A Oq,ORif 4T4i W MT CCMCRIr7T" C RORIIR'ANR ONrlalf O. snxco E MOOD MOOR FcA TRQ, L T100o a„ur,su ,. wrn H smmp (HA,IDT L - ompAsm N. RR,O[ VS,®{ O. MkR I. w pI1 O� wrvc T, 1oTLenP R. YCZfONAL OARAOR DOOIU S. DK'ORATM Ind T. WOOD RARdRI u. oawmeT ca► �. RIICEtl i s"A� LAGCN r.. f,0. REAR ,o o ,e xixa ,i R SOMOLM y� 1 it a • J t LEFT a! �l-�.... ,.'f+�:�?"n.^^+�T4'?T't._•rrrFti t �:'cr��:.. e .v Pardee Homes Coen wy�mie n.w. n.�rre ,000 LOe ANOeil�. U 90021 orml sau� PLAN 1 ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7 -11-02 —1- i C �1-1' L 1. DA.7H SR7CC0 i 2. ACCENT STUCCO J Lu,euAU: A Cd101te LTeL e. llAt COMOIR1142 C. MUWCAM LfVI'fO: D. MO R T1C(A OMY IOAM n� L wODD� )_ nnsea� ammo nwnt pARDI L wDDD IAK1A L DDI.VLe'O LL none rem o. mx:co,o'wmr R eEC11ONAL OARADe DOOIU U. OmOreT W I.� I Pardee Homes IOtW MII�GR6 M.VD. NRE /f00 ()10) n })!U SEE" 5 'I - Pwlm -e SHE l —J 6ARAQE .20 . 20 I> ,EN LrVU40 PLAN 2 ±2,900 S.F. M O O R P A R K PA -2/3 07 -11-02 mtOWl a a: a SSNLAN y� 9 OPT. DEM PLAN 2 Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K ® PA -2/3 yaw vnumm Kw.lvrta isao 07 -11-02 ld AN0m8�. G 1000. 07 1.2F-r .SECOM? FLOOR ADDENDA B 7- -7� - - - Pardee Homes 7 FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA B PLAN 2 M O O R P A R K ➢ORTECOCHMME A - 2 / 3 Pardee Homes 7 FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA B 7-11-02 —"r Mssa4m C 0 G I PLAN 2 M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7-11-02 —"r Mssa4m C 0 G I 214 z SECOND FLOOR ADDEND C DU41NO 2-f ---------- 71. PORTFIC0090ILE Ul" FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA C- CA. PLAN 2 M O O R P A R K Pardee Homes PA -2/3 lWW Wn.JH= � VD. SUM 19CO LO„01M 7-11-02 —. CA. REAR 1 4 I� Pardee Homes Idp rTRJ�{� Rl VD. lVTIE 1!O! L9! ANOIA�R. G T0021 LEFT RIGHT PLAN 2 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7 -11-02 OOOI1" -Z . 11 I i ....J.....------- ROOF PLAN 1. eASE STUCCO _2. ACCENT STUCCO M 72RLN : A CON01:11TCA s. R.ar caNOlnery c RVRRICANR SRVrISu D. qON 6 DR.QIATIV! VRIT P RXPOl RAPM TAKE M FmccoO IGM TRR{ L MOOD annTma J. —nT -amm MARDI ROARD) K 110lR{VO ®! N. O. conbp O. vrvcm gif1�1 R gICRO OANA OOgN V. Cl@p[r G!P V. Rq>lY! I� °I I i ©S3 Ir r 1 l . I l h I � 70 _ 1 REAR I r RrO/rr LEFT RIGHT Pardee Homes I loefo fva�lmle ea.w. svrte Ifno X09 AMOelEf. U 901#. I)10)9�J Jf]f PLAN 2 ELEVATION B M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7-11-02 02l Ol 111 L /E rU rN 'y /II Y�l _ . ROOF PLAN 1. BASF STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO lwwrtauwle- w. mnalcle sTa>a e. nwr mrlaefx TV.e c lluulcwwe fwlmas o. aon e necv�wrlve vetrr e. eloofl.v awvlta Twns � fv000 sl�vrrrws 1. esfmoowfmwo mwwrllflwNt tc vom rwsaw L COIURWf M fTO14 Vp!® N. M1CIC VBI� O L� P. POGO �OIAfnl Q. ffl.'RO �01�1a]J ti f8CI1I1HAL OARAM l% 3 f OeCO11ATTV6 �lIfD T MOOD IApLq V fBCEM r sksseqm -� C OG4 ,wiy�w�en REAR Pardee Homes Iosso wn�en.w.surtn lsao I1M ANOdtI. G VODU tvm � +sosv PLAN 2 ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7 -11-02 —.1- � Fu ROOF PLAN 1. BASE WMCCO 2. ACCETlI' S7VCC0 ! MATfUALI A CONaEI! }T➢d I. NaT CaNACiET6l C NONCAN! ONRitlA! D. sd1 DIOD�ATiV {vRf1' F. WO!®1lAIIa TApJ O d1OR.0 x mxco ovs lover nw t wooD nrtmaa 1. m[11w10R /mlIOOIARDT lOM1n R WOOD tIJe•A L WlA1M10 K LION! VBI ®I N. SIC( VQI� O. CWRI • FOOD Nltfiml O. ltOCf.V NIIB!) A lRl10N�l.0YAOC ODDI1f u. amper cv v. ■sass I T -- ' 4V V* PLAN 3 ±3,116 S.F. M O O R P A R K .Pardee Homes -2/3 P A not rro-vu auoi u+ �Wmmu6m bi . ............. . PLAN 3 ±3,116 S.F. M O O R P A R K .Pardee Homes -2/3 P A not rro-vu auoi u+ �Wmmu6m �J BBDRM 2 _ Y OPT. DECK BATH r3 BA. 2 J L r M B®RM pt - - -� �u 6a BFDRM J T. OP WPT x• f BA. 3 BEDRM !� !. � � lw - ra... .r • rr . ao s - ar I I PLAN 3 Pardee Homes MOORPARK PA -2/3 L.G ANOREt. G VOp]. �� c" . 067 07 -11-02 � "'+— SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA B FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA __ __ _ B BASSD4AN �). Loss PLAN 3 MOORPARK Pardee Homes P A - 2 / 3 loan wvMMs BLw. lime )900 wl wwnts, a vma� (3lo) 47s3n 7.11-02 wol In BASSD4AN �). Loss SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA GARAGE --------- - - - -- - - - - - --F-77—T-7,27-777 .41 FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA c PLAN 3 MOORPARK Pardee Homes —--------- .41 FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA c 54SSD4m MM -CC069 PLAN 3 MOORPARK Pardee Homes PA -2/3 loco w u3 z s W,. Surm INC 7-11-02 54SSD4m MM -CC069 is �4 i I >� MUNT"EREY REAR Pardee Homes laso wus]mis eLw.3Qrre lvoo LO3 AN 9f102� 111101 01473 {)] )3 ]J I LEFT �• I�y c- l RIGHT PLAN 3 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7 -11-02 RJ�1112' 4 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO I wATmuA)s. A. ODNDPIY fT1tY B. PLAT OONCfP]E TII1 C MLlfICANF.SMVITT3L1 a QmnwAn -- F C1003PDfAF]P1TA 1. P]ClPlgf ffbW O].unv fpAFDi K WOOD FAWA L LOLUfpS O CY RDfi 5 P. WOOD POT]Nl!IJ Q. YTL'CW !'OI3]QlF U. M- CAP v -3 a�ss�nN T r -B _T) - L - I - R T, 1. - . I COASTAL 'e r 00 REAR �P... ....... LEFT RIGHT Pardee Homes PLAN 3 ELEVATION B M O O R P A R K P A - 2 / 3 7 -11-0x 14\ ROOF PLAN x. BA� SCCO AC STUCM \. MT COf1018Tt Tp2 D. DON P. f000,ID IIAIIQ TALL) O1AJtDY WARD) IL MOOD tA,OA O. T. MOOD 11/1LLLi0 U. Of0.411YC- LACA)N C. 0 A , rl R K E, M-. -- _e _ : I " PEAR PLAN 3 ELEVATION C Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K P A 2 3 7-11 �02 —1- IV au ROOF PLAN I BASE STUCCO 2: ACCENT STUCCO MATWU- w ooDUTCrz o-rna e. Put coNarTe rttr C HVRETCANE SHUT !•f D RON t. DncOITAl vi4+T P. EOI S kAp(TTx rA O WMC(O Om—T[LTe k lolop"CU I axUT.00 M. STONE vwm v COIIIPld p OwPOfelmP Q. STUCCO P07310" "CT AL OAR g DOOM! V. CFmpEY CAP v, E¢CTSf BASSENLAN U.0c" 0 T -v III LTViNo BA- :t\_ Pardee Homes PLAN 1 3,083 SQ. FT. M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11-02 -n 9kS5U4AN LACAO" BA. 1, HEORM 2 BEDRM 3 ADDENDA . ..... GARAGE • ADDENDA_ " _.__ __.. -. PLAN I Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K LACC" -&ks5D" �OOQ0714 PA -4 7-11-02 K A V E. (2X6) V G Q D F R 7 EARLY CALIFORNIA f. Pardee Homes 1 ROOF PLAN PLAN 1 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 4 711-02 F, A 1. BASE STUCCO 2 ACCENT STUCCO A c s11IUT — D. GUN o. cTx�lus Q —c POT J, GARAop M.— 3. DECORwT1r1f eves c- a-SSEWN LACC" )2X4.2X6) B M 1 K I P (I X6.2X2) -F E R G TRADITIONAL Y 5. :. zp� P_ ardee Homes �a /w wn�bN�RP BLVD SURL'�w� I A-,. O�.�J.JJU ROOF PLAN _ PLAN I ELEVATION B M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 11,02 W-3 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO MAlFJUA1.S A (Y)NOteIE S.TIIE x —cco ovenmwnbM � w000 sx-rtvxs U. exifwloR smrvo fMAIIDY wARD� R- WOOD PASL]A _ COl.1fIAMb k STONC V@iekA n. buac vPmtn O COI DBLS P. WOOD P(1I41�P p TIL'('OO TOf510'JP R. SeCTSOYAL OARAOE D(X1R5 DecoRA *wn.+.Rs WmD RAawo �. cima+er cwe V. RefG59 B1�EUM1 ,1'11 — i'p ITALIAN (lX4) 1 2 H H H G -L v u P1, - B., U. I UL NO* Pardee Homes (310) 475-35� (1X4) I A -D R H G —X /* ROOF PLAN PLAN I ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11 2 I BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO fTUCCYI H. ffUCCOOVW{POwM TRIM i. WO(ll)fNI.TTYJCf i -Dy IIOARpI MOOD PwfM L o. cDRncts I O. —CM T TROT=: 0 o 0 7 /__ 7f'A' PLAN 2 3,554 SQ. FT. (3,835 SQ. FT. W/ OPT. LOFT) Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K PA -4 labbo wamu bt.w. limn �fm 1.06 Al�J6. G tllbf� (f 30) elf -flit 7-11-02 =,Mn A N S I S I p f A = 'P I I ! B�SSEAL4`J SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA B FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA B ooco,-g PLAN 2 M O O R P A R K Pardee Homes PA -4 (310) 47- 7-11112 oa J. ooco,-g SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA C FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA C 0 OcColso PLAN 2 Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K _._ -- - PA -4 l.0] MIOHEI. G 11p2. o,u�.isaw 7-11 -02 „b 0 OcColso (2X6) --K S -Q I r`�lr�lq•- 5 r. § :1••iy� :,1..'J:N 'r�1 ::�:il :: "II171 W�.::;.IIj11 i�i -::ice :111'r i':�II�IJI✓: rtMIN Mr! M RIGHT Pardee Homes lasso WR-V B *C Sly 24 iVf1f1 I t.os Anue�s. CA voo:. ivul.Teaeu I I (IX6) 'F ' L .0 _ -A ' T r G H R Q r �r� PLAN 2 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 -11-02 on auN 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO MATeuAls A ODNCRPIE STIIY 0. PLAT (:ON(]IFiY. TRl' P. PO'Q4® RAPTpI TA— H 4iUCCO OY POAM TRIM 1. WOOD SHL'RHIIS 1. PJ(TOUOR STDLYNO OIARDI'LOAM) R. WOOD PAS(lA L COLf.TQiS M. STONB VRN1iJ! N BIICF Vim! ®t O. CORDHS Q STUCCO TV1,11HP R SCCTONAL OAMC nY1;g1ATIK PP61 T W(%NJRA- C. CHALNCY CAP v, YvtYA{ MS5D4AN L-cc 1 �04�C?0�1 ter::. M� ROOF PLAN PLAN 2 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 -11-02 on auN 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCENT STUCCO MATeuAls A ODNCRPIE STIIY 0. PLAT (:ON(]IFiY. TRl' P. PO'Q4® RAPTpI TA— H 4iUCCO OY POAM TRIM 1. WOOD SHL'RHIIS 1. PJ(TOUOR STDLYNO OIARDI'LOAM) R. WOOD PAS(lA L COLf.TQiS M. STONB VRN1iJ! N BIICF Vim! ®t O. CORDHS Q STUCCO TV1,11HP R SCCTONAL OAMC nY1;g1ATIK PP61 T W(%NJRA- C. CHALNCY CAP v, YvtYA{ MS5D4AN L-cc 1 �04�C?0�1 ter::. x xx '= x w o- �o ry \� 1 r Y 1 u N 2 B o V%iti MYY � oaa � N 1 f1 c2 Q c �1 NO a ► �x d W W 0 1. Ia.� L I HLLHIV an it1 i: .;.:s PNE:: .7 A (1)(4) (IX6.1)(4) (2X4) H I H v -Q H • V, K .... .. ....... RIGHT Pardee Homes WS - CA I I It. G G Ql; 4>, Z// ROOF PLAN PLAN 2 ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 11-02 .1-3 H -R 1. BASE STUCCO 2. ACCEINT STUCCO D. IRON c. anttv 1. WOOD a11V1'IHIS 1. BRTWU011 alDp:O !HARDY BOARD) L O. CORlE1S P. W-- v. RBCBfia 000053 ki PLAN 3 3,763 SQ. FT. (3,932 SQ. FT.W /OPT. LOFT) Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K MSSMAN l�l ATIOC1f, G PIOI�lilfl! 7-II 02 -- OUG084 OfYOIIIi �— Y a KIT CNEN - — - `– — BEDRM 5 !iy -___ : —. %• T_� DINING i V, a v ENSRY PDR `N GARAGE r LA �o ,gg DEN A -. �'-- - GARAGE . e e PLAN 3 3,763 SQ. FT. (3,932 SQ. FT.W /OPT. LOFT) Pardee Homes M O O R P A R K MSSMAN l�l ATIOC1f, G PIOI�lilfl! 7-II 02 -- OUG084 OfYOIIIi �— OPT. LOFT ADDT'L AREA x169 SF. OPTIONAL DP.00 Pardee Homes Joao wv�ma u.w. suns ism LOi AMOW /. G WN• mo�asvv PLAN 3 M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 -11-02 o 11. a SSEIIA N ocleros5 SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA DVGNG T�4 L LAU DEN FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA Pardee Homes GARAGE r--\ BA. lk e.tll GARAGE. PLAN 3 M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11-02 moIM ----B- B-SSDAAN 0()C-OSG SECOND FLOOR ADDENDA c 16 GARAGE .FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA c Pardee Homes ��lvn� min sew. stmt �foo PLAN 3 DVIaNG R P A R K P BA. 4 7-11-02 PDW' a .In ENTRY DAMAGE LAU DEN r7- 2 16 GARAGE .FIRST FLOOR ADDENDA c Pardee Homes ��lvn� min sew. stmt �foo PLAN 3 M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11-02 a .In L)VA3N I AM Om��L ooc' 08.7 (2x4) ZX4 (IX4) K D G F F Y,' S ..p A F H R PEAR LEFT RIGHT r-- -- --- Pardee Homes' CA Z, EARLY CALIFORNIA PEAR LEFT RIGHT r-- -- --- Pardee Homes' CA PLAN 3 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 4 -1-11-02 WI-11 OCCOSS 42 ROOF PLAN I SAE STUCCO i 2 Accexr STtjcco A D. B OT E O. BTUCm —A- Z O. mRBHS Q 3TOCYV POTSNHF =A- T WRABlNO v, RESVa< PLAN 3 ELEVATION A M O O R P A R K P A - 4 -1-11-02 WI-11 OCCOSS (IX6.2X4) I I '-K I G G N . 1 P T- B- 1 %I y TRADrrIONAL (2X6) (IX4) K H R RFAR G , . L� ;. ROOF PLAN h= t . Pardee Homes ;MW wUSH— RIND. SURE 1400 1. !<, ?,OI �r1 .111 �• I PLAN 3 ELEVATION B M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7 -11-02 0`1L1IL 1. BASF. STUCCO 2_ ACCBhT STUCCO wATmunls. c:uHCxr. rz s.TU� e MT COH(]tP[E TIC+ C NURRlCAN6 SNUTRIXa D U10N G DPLYIRATIVE VplT tJtP06® PMEIt TAU._S O SNttD H. aTUCCV OV}J! FOAM TAUA L WOOD ffiUITPJI3 1. PJ(TPJUOR SDDMO DURDY UOARDI O COPJV, c P WOOD POT1lO4Y p. an:cm rarr'aHn.t' — sernDHAL OA�woH nlw,a s uecoawTrve PDass wooD wn¢un U. CHDR+eT CAP V °vrvaa &ASSU AN " pci -'09 (2X6) 11X6) (M) 2 (1X4) I A K * H H H K , I A H • H, --V —H G ITALIAN lag Pardee Homes ws M- 1A �4 (IX4) H R PLAN 3 ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11-01 1. BASESTUCCO 2* ACCENT STUCCO w. PLAT c ­ •ls F "POSPD BwPIIDITA S O. STUCCO 1. FOOD SNITIPRS IL WWD ­ I- ''OL_' M. IT— — 4 BwK VMY ­RS DPCVRAIT'C POPS U. CHIMNEY (N T v. gpCPBT occo!30 LAC43" 'WI 4- ZL ROOF PLAN_____ PLAN 3 ELEVATION C M O O R P A R K P A - 4 7-11-01 1. BASESTUCCO 2* ACCENT STUCCO w. PLAT c ­ •ls F "POSPD BwPIIDITA S O. STUCCO 1. FOOD SNITIPRS IL WWD ­ I- ''OL_' M. IT— — 4 BwK VMY ­RS DPCVRAIT'C POPS U. CHIMNEY (N T v. gpCPBT occo!30 LAC43" RESOLUTION NO. PC -2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -02, TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2 AND RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOS. 2002- 03, -04, AND -05 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TOTAL OF318 SINGLE - FAMILY, DETACHED DWELLING UNITS WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF MILE NORTH OF NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF SPRING ROAD AND THREE - FOURTHS OF ONE MILE EAST OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, ON THE APPLICATION OF PARDEE HOMES. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS: 500 -0- 270 -07, 512 -0- 160 -55, 512 -0- 160 -70, 500 -0- 270 -19, 500 -0- 270 -20, 512 -0- 160 -54, AND 500 -0- 024-03) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission considered Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03 for the construction of 95 single- family, detached dwelling units on 17.7 acres within Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 2; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -04 for the construction of 145 single- family, detached dwelling units on 38.4 acres within Planning Areas 2 and 3 of Specific Plan No. 2; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05 for the construction of seventy (78) single- family, detached dwelling units on 24.7 acres within Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 2; and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02, to amend development standards within Specific Plan No. 2, located approximately one -half mile north of the northerly terminus of Spring Road and three - fourths of one mile east of Walnut Canyon Road, on the application of Pardee Homes. (Assessor Parcel Numbers: portions of 500- 0 -270- 07, 512 -0- 160 -55, 512 -0- 160 -70, 500 -0- 270 -19, 500 -0- 270 -20, 512- 0- 160 -54, AND 500 -0- 024 -03); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and any written public comments; opened the public hearing, took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal, closed the public hearing, and reached a decision on this matter; and S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2002 \03 Pardee \Reso -Cond \reso PC.doc PC ATTACHMENT 3 00 -0091 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that the projects are consistent with the findings of the Environmental Impact Report, and any amendments thereto, approved in connection with the Moorpark Highlands - Specific Plan No. 2 and has considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed project will provide for the orderly development of land identified in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as appropriate for residential development. B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development, in that the surrounding development will include a variety of single- family, detached and attached homes, including some homes which are affordable to moderate, low, and very low income families. C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the use proposed is similar to uses existing or proposed to the south and west, and access to or utility of those adjacent uses are not hindered by this project. D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that adequate provision of public access, sanitary services, and emergency services have been ensured prior to the processing of this request. E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located, in that the existing and planned land uses in the general area are generally single- family, detached residential uses, recreational uses, and the 0C, C092 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 3 Waterworks facility, which will be sufficiently separated from this project to avoid impacts. F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure (s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character, in that the proposed project complies with all development standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and the development will utilize high quality architectural materials and treatments to enhance the visual appeal of the structures to be constructed. SECTION 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of: A. Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03 for the construction of ninety -five (95) single- family, detached dwelling units on 17.7 acres within Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 2; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -04 for the construction of 145 single- family, detached dwelling units on 38.4 acres within Planning Areas 2 and 3 of Specific Plan No. 2; Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05 for the construction of 78 single- family, detached dwelling units on 24.7 acres within Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 2 per Special and Standard Conditions of Approval per Exhibits A, B and C; and B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment development standards within Exhibit D. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF Development Director shall certify resolution and shall cause a certifii the book of original resolutions. No. 2002 -02, to amend Specific Plan No. 2 per ADOPTION: The Community to the adoption of this i�d resolution to be filed in OC CO93 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 4 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2004. Scott Pozza, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit A: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03 Exhibit B: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -04 Exhibit C: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05 Exhibit D: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2002 -02. 000094 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 5 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2002 -03 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for building permit for the first residential unit, the Applicant shall contribute up to thirty- thousand ($30,000) dollars for funding endangered wildlife species breeding, predator trapping, or other support programs in the open space easement area as required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This contribution shall be coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and be made to an appropriate private conservation institution upon approval of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Evidence of contribution approved by the service shall be presented to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for Building Permit, the Applicant shall contribute fifteen - thousand ($15,000) dollars towards the City's sensitive species research program (established as a component of the Open Space Trust Fund related to maintenance of the Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element and related programs). 3. The Pardee Homes architectural booklet titled "Moorpark Highlands," shall form the basis of the evaluation of architectural treatment to be incorporated on each residential structure for permit issuance. At a minimum, the drawings and color and materials samples that have depicted the respective architectural styles and sub - styles shall be incorporated in the project, as presented in the architectural manual. 4. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit for the first residential unit, the applicant shall submit wall plans to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The wall plans shall be approved prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 5. Within one year of the start of initial grading of Tract 5045, the applicant shall remove the existing walls along the west side of Spring Road between High Street and Los Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 6 Angeles Avenue, and replace the existing walls with new decorative walls and landscaping. The new walls shall be a minimum of six (6') feet in height, of a decorative material, and have a design acceptable to the Community Development Director. Wall plans shall be submitted for approval to the Community Development Director within thirty (30) days of the issuance of a grading permit, or within thirty (30) days of the approval of this Residential Planned Development Permit, whichever is later. 6. At least twenty five percent (250) of the dwellings, but no more than forty (400) percent, of the dwellings shall be represented by any one of the architectural styles. No sub -style shall be represented by more than forty (400) percent of the dwellings for each architectural style. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permits, the applicant shall prepare, and submit for approval, a minimum of three plans for the installation of an lattice - roofed patio cover in the rear yard of each floor plan proposed. These patio covers shall be offered as an option to home buyers, and the plans shall be made available to buyers in the event they decide to build the cover after they occupy the home. 8. Any change in the architectural elements shall require prior approval by the Community Development Director. Approval of any change shall require the Director to find that the change is consistent with these approved conditions, the Zoning Code and compatible with the dwellings along that street frontage and the dwellings located within two- hundred (200') feet of the side property line, as determined by the Community Development Director. 9. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of twenty (20') feet in length and ten (10') feet in width for each parking stall provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Community Development Department: 1. The Residential Planned Development Permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". 00100'96 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 7 The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 and any subsequent modifications shall apply to this Residential Planned Development Permit. 3. Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) 1 -year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the tentative tract map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 4. Prior to occupancy of each dwelling unit the Applicant shall install front yard landscaping as approved on the landscape plans. S. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within fifteen (151) feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than five (5') feet of level ground. 6. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 7. Two car garages with a minimum clear and unobstructed dimension of twenty (20') feet in length by twenty (20') feet in width shall be provided for each for each dwelling unit. 8. Rain gutters and downspouts shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the 0 U C -097 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 8 street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. 9. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. B. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Engineering Division: 10. The City Engineering Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5045 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03. C. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Fire Department: 11. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. D. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1: 12. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. E. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Police Department: 13. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. F. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Moorpark Unified School District: 14. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable OU C 0'98 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 9 at the time of issuance of a to the Moorpark Unified School -End- building permit shall be paid District. OCC,099 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 10 EXHIBIT B SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2002 -04 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for the first residential unit, the Applicant shall contribute up to thirty- thousand dollars ($30,000) for funding endangered wildlife species breeding, predator trapping, or other support programs in the open space easement area as required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This contribution shall be coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and be made to an appropriate private conservation institution upon approval of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Evidence of contribution approved by the service shall be presented to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall contribute fifteen - thousand ($15,000) dollars towards the City's sensitive species research program (established as a component of the Open Space Trust Fund related to maintenance of the Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element and related programs). 3. The Pardee Homes architectural booklet titled "Moorpark Highlands," shall form the basis of the evaluation of architectural treatment to be incorporated on each residential structure for permit issuance. At a minimum, the drawings and color and materials samples that have depicted the respective architectural styles and sub - styles shall be incorporated in the project as presented in the architectural manual. 4. At least twenty five (250) percent of the dwellings, but no more than forty (400) percent, of the dwellings shall be represented by any one of the architectural styles. No sub -style shall be represented by more than forty (400) percent of the dwellings for each architectural style. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permits, the applicant shall prepare, and submit for 0()"Cl00 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 11 approval, a minimum of three plans for the installation of an lattice - roofed patio cover in the rear yard of each floor plan proposed. These patio covers shall be offered as an option to home buyers, and the plans shall be made available to buyers in the event they decide to build the cover after they occupy the home. 6. Any change in the architectural elements shall require prior approval by the Community Development Director. Approval of any change shall require the Director to find that the change is consistent with these approved conditions, the Zoning Code and compatible with the dwellings along that street frontage and the dwellings located within two - hundred (200') feet of the side property line as determined by the Community Development Director. -7. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of twenty feet (20') in length and ten (10') feet in width for each parking stall provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Community Development Department: 1. The Residential Planned Development Permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 and any subsequent modifications shall apply to this Residential Planned Development Permit. 3. Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) 1 -year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project OU10101 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 12 during the initial 3 -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the Tentative Tract Map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 4. Prior to occupancy of each dwelling unit the Applicant shall install front yard landscaping as approved on the landscape plans. 5. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within fifteen (151) feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than five (5') feet of level ground. 6. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 7. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices, as determined by the City Engineer. 8. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. B. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Engineering Division: 9. The City Engineering Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5045 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03. C. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Fire Department: 10. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. Oi1011102 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 13 D. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1: 11. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. E. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Police Department: 12. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. F. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Moorpark Unified School District: 13. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. -End- ®U%103 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 14 EXHIBIT C SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2002 -05 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for the first residential unit, the Applicant shall contribute up to thirty- thousand ($30,000) dollars for funding endangered wildlife species breeding, predator trapping, or other support programs in the open space easement area as required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This contribution shall be coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and be made to an appropriate private conservation institution upon approval of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Evidence of contribution approved by the service shall be presented to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall contribute fifteen - thousand ($15,000) dollars towards the City's sensitive species research program (established as a component of the Open Space Trust Fund related to maintenance of the Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element and related programs). 3. The Pardee Homes architectural booklet titled "Moorpark Highlands," shall form the basis of the evaluation of architectural treatment to be incorporated on each residential structure for permit issuance. At a minimum, the drawings and color and materials samples that have depicted the respective architectural styles and sub - styles shall be incorporated in the project as presented in the architectural manual. 4. No more than forty (40 %) percent, but no less than twenty (20 %) percent, of the dwellings shall be represented by any one of the architectural styles and no sub -style shall be represented by more than forty (40 %) percent of the maximum number of dwellings allowed for the primary architectural style. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare, and submit for 0 V C104 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 15 approval, plans for the installation of an open patio cover in the rear yard of each floor plan proposed. These patio covers shall be offered as an option to home buyers, and the plans shall be made available to buyers in the event they decide to build the cover after they occupy the home. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Community Development Department: 1. The Residential Planned Development Permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 and any subsequent modifications shall apply to this Residential Planned Development Permit. 3. Unless the Residential Planned Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) one 1 -year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the Tentative Tract Map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 4. Prior to occupancy of each dwelling unit the Applicant shall install front yard landscaping as approved on the landscape plans. S. No expansion, alteration or change in architectural elements that are visible from any abutting street shall be allowed, unless in the judgment of the Community 0VC10 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 16 Development Director such change is compatible with all dwellings having frontage on the same street and located within two - hundred (200') feet (or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director) of the side property line of the structure proposed for expansion or alteration, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director consistent with these approved conditions and Zoning Code requirements. 6. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within fifteen (15') feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than five (51) feet of level ground. 7. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 8. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of twenty (20') feet in length and ten (10') feet in width for each parking stall provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. 9. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. 10. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. B. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Engineering Division: 11. The City Engineering Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5045 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03. 00 106 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 17 C. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Fire Department: 12. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. D. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1: 13. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5045 shall apply. E. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Police Department: 14. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. F. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Moorpark Unified School District: 15. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. -End- 0 � C 10,1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 18 EXHIBIT D PROPOSED REVISIONS Zoning Ordinance Amendment (revised text in Italics) Section 17.74.040.1 Single - family residential site development standards. B. Specific Plan No. 2 Residential Planned Development Single- family (SP2- RPD -SF) 2.5 to 4.5 du /ac Zone. Planning Areas (P.A. ) 2, 3, and 4. 1. Minimum lot area: six - thousand (6,000) square feet. 2. Building Setbacks. a . The Front setback minimum for six - thousand (6,000) square foot lots is twenty (20') feet for products where the garage door (s) is even with, or forward of living space, and all garage doors face the street. In order to encourage a varied street scene and reduce the potential for a garage door dominated project, the front setback may be reduced to fifteen (15') feet where any of the following design elements are incorporated into the architecture of the homes: Living space is forward (closer to the street) of the garage door Swing garages with the opening facing the side lot line Products that incorporate port cocheres, or other architectural features that screen at least a portion of the garage doors from the street Or as approved by the Community Development Director. Any two adjacent lots may have the same front setback, however the third consecutive lot should vary the front setback by three (31) feet or more, as appropriate to the street and lot configuration and to provide variety in the streetscape. b. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit adjacent to a street is ten (10' ) feet, with the OCC1108 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 19 exception that the minimum side setback adjacent to Spring Road shall be twenty (201) feet. c. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit on an interior lot shall be seven and one -half (7;-2') feet with not less than fifteen (15') feet between structures. Side setback minimum for a second story deck or balcony is ten (101) feet. d. Rear setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit is twenty (20') feet, for an enclosed patio or open patio cover is ten (10') feet, for a second story deck or balcony is twenty (20') feet, and for an accessory structure is five (5') feet. e. For projects on a hillside area and where it can be clearly established that reduced setbacks will enhance preservation of natural terrain and reduced grading, front setbacks may be reduced by the approving authority to ten (10') feet as applied to the main portion of the dwelling. Garage setbacks shall normally be twenty (201) feet except for a side loaded garage where a minimum driveway depth of twenty (20') feet from the right -of -way edge shall be provided. 3. Maximum building height: a. Thirty -five (35') feet for dwelling units; b. Fifteen (15') feet for accessory structures; C. Twelve (12') feet for a patio cover and second floor deck or balcony, not including railing height; No more than three (3) stories shall be permitted. 4. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code, with the exception that sound attenuation walls shall be constructed to a height as required by a city- approved noise study for the Residential Planned Development Permit. 5. Parking. Parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, except as otherwise OCC109 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 20 noted in this chapter. Tandem, i.e. end to end, garage spaces are allowed. 6. Signage. Signage shall comply with Chapter 17.40 of the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, except as otherwise noted in this chapter. 7. Recreational Amenities. Residential Planned Development Permit areas with single- family lots that have an average size of less than seven - thousand (7,000) square feet shall include private recreational amenities such as, but not limited to the following: clubhouse, restrooms, swimming pool and spa, play apparatus, picnic shelter, barbecue area with seating, court game facilities (non - lighted), and multipurpose fields. The types of amenities shall be reviewed and approved with the required Residential Planned Development Permit. 8. Eaves and Window Treatments and Surrounds. The eaves and window treatments and surrounds on all sides of a structure shall be complimentary with the eaves and window treatments and surrounds on the front elevation. 9. Wrap- Around Front Elevation Treatment. The architectural style and treatment included along the front elevation of a single- family unit shall continue along each side elevation until commencement of fencing or other architecturally feasible termination point as determined by the Residential Planned Development Permit approval body. C. Specific Plan No. 2 Residential Planned Development Single- family (SP2- RPD -SF) 6 du /ac Zone. Planning Area (P.A.) 1 1. Minimum Lot Area: three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet. 2. Building Setbacks. a. Front setback minimum for three- thousand -five- hundred (3,500) square foot lots is twenty (201) feet for products where the garage door(s) is even with or forward of, living space, and all garage doors face the street. In order to encourage a varied street scene and reduce the potential for a garage door dominated project, the front setback may be reduced to 000110 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 21 fifteen (15) feet where any of the following design elements are incorporated into the architecture of the homes: Living space is forward (i.e. closer to the street) of the garage door Or as approved by the Community Development Director Any two adjacent lots may have the same front setback; however the third consecutive lot should vary the front setback by three (3) or more feet, as appropriate to the street and lot configuration, and to provide for variety in the streetscape. b. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit adjacent to a street is ten (10') feet, with the exception that the minimum side setback adjacent to Spring Road shall be twenty (201) feet. C. Side setback minimum for a single - family dwelling unit on an interior lot shall be five (5') feet. Side setback minimum for a second story deck or balcony is ten (10') feet. d. Rear setback minimum for a single - family dwelling unit is fifteen (15') feet, for an enclosed patio or open patio cover is ten (10') feet, for a - second story deck or balcony is twenty (20') feet, and for an accessory structure is five (51) feet. 3. Maximum building height: a. Thirty -five (35') feet for dwelling units; b. Fifteen (15') feet for accessory structures; C. Twelve (12') feet for a patio cover and second floor deck or balcony, not including railing height. 4. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code, with the exception that sound attenuation walls shall be constructed to a height as required by a city- approved noise study for the Residential Planned Development Permit. Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 22 5. Parking. Parking the City of Moorpark noted in this chapter spaces are allowed. 6. Signage. Signage the City of Moorpark noted in this chapter. shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of Municipal Code, except as otherwise Tandem, i.e. end to end, garage shall comply with Chapter 17.40 of Municipal Code, except as otherwise 7. Recreational Amenities. Residential Planned Development Permit areas with single- family lots that have an average size of less than seven - thousand (7,000) square feet shall include private recreational amenities such as, but not limited to the following: clubhouse, restrooms, swimming pool and spa, play apparatus, picnic shelter, barbecue area with seating, court game facilities (non - lighted), and multipurpose fields. The types of amenities shall be reviewed and approved with the required Residential Planned Development Permit. 8. Eaves and Window Treatments and Surrounds. The eaves and window treatments and surrounds on all sides of a structure shall be complimentary with the eaves and window treatments and surrounds on the front elevation. 9. Wrap- Around Front Elevation Treatment. The architectural style and treatment included along the front elevation of a single - family unit shall continue along each side elevation until commencement of fencing or other architecturally feasible termination point, as determined by the Residential Planned Development Permit approval body. 00 "C112 (Excerpt) EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE for MOORPARK Section 17.74.040.1 Single - family residential site development standards. B. Specific Plan No. 2 Residential Planned Development single- family (SP2- RPD -SF) 2.54.5 du /ac Zone. 1. Minimum lot area: six thousand (6,000) square feet. 2. Building Setbacks. a. Front setback minimum is twenty (20) feet. The front setbacks for the proposed single- family dwelling units shall be varied so as to provide visual diversity. There shall be a minimum of three (3) feet variation with a maximum variation of five (5) feet for the front setback between adjacent lots, with no more than two adjacent lots having the same front setback. Dwelling units constructed with garages having a curved or swing driveway, with the entrance to the garage facing the side property line, shall have a minimum front setback of fifteen (15) feet. b. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit adjacent to a street is ten (10) feet, with the exception that the minimum side setback adjacent to Spring Road shall be twenty (20) feet. c. Side setback minimum for a single - family dwelling unit on an interior lot, other than for exceptions listed below, shall be five (5) feet. Side setback minimum for a second story deck or balcony is ten (10) feet. d. Side setback minimum for a two -story single- family dwelling unit on an interior lot larger than seven - thousand (7,000) square feet, with windows facing the adjacent property, is seven and one -half (7.5) feet, with not less than fifteen (15) feet between structures. e. Rear setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit is twenty (20) feet, for an enclosed patio or S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2002 \03 Pardee \Reso -Cond \Attachment 2a.doc PC ATTACHMENT 4 OCCII13 open patio cover is ten (10 ) feet, for a second story deck or balcony is twenty (20) feet, and for an accessory structure is five (5) feet. f. For projects on a hillside area, and where it can be clearly established that reduced setbacks will enhance preservation of natural terrain and reduced grading, front setbacks may be reduced by the approving authority to ten (10) feet as applied to the main portion of the dwelling. Garage setbacks shall normally be twenty (20) feet except for a side - loaded garage where a minimum driveway depth of twenty (20) feet from the right -of -way edge shall be provided. 3. Maximum building height: a. Thirty -five (35) feet for dwelling units; b. Fifteen (15) feet for accessory structures; C. Twelve (12) feet for a patio cover and second floor deck or balcony, not including railing height; d. No more than three (3) stories shall be permitted. 4. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code, with the exception that sound attenuation walls shall be constructed to a height as required by a city- approved noise study for the residential planned development permit. 5. Parking. Parking the city of Moorpark noted in this chapter. 6. Signage. Signage the city of Moorpark noted in this chapter. shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of Municipal Code, except as otherwise shall comply with Chapter 17.40 of Municipal Code, except as otherwise 7. Recreational Amenities. Residential planned development permit areas with single- family lots that have an average size of less than seven - thousand (7,000) square feet shall include private recreational amenities such as, but not limited to the following: clubhouse, restrooms, swimming pool and spa, play apparatus, picnic shelter, barbecue area with seating, court game facilities (non - lighted), and multipurpose fields. The types of amenities shall be reviewed and approved with the required residential planned development permit. 060114 8. Eaves and Window Treatments and Surrounds. The eaves and window treatments and surrounds on all sides of a structure shall be consistent with the eaves and window treatments and surrounds on the front elevation. 9. Wrap- Around Front Elevation Treatment. The architectural style and treatment included along the front elevation of a single - family unit shall continue along each side elevation until commencement of fencing or other architecturally feasible termination point as determined by the residential planned development permit approval body. 10. Solar Panels. Solar panels shall not be permitted on the front elevation of dwelling units if the panel may be seen from a public street. C. Specific Plan No. 2 Residential Planned Development single- family (SP2- RPD -SF) 6 du /ac Zone. 1. Minimum Lot Area: three - thousand - five - hundred (3,500) square feet. 2. Building Setbacks. a. Front setback minimum is twenty (20) feet. The front setbacks for the proposed single- family dwelling units shall be varied so as to provide visual diversity. There shall be a minimum of three (3) feet variation with a maximum variation of five (5) feet for the front setback between adjacent lots, with no more than two adjacent lots having the same front setback. Dwelling units constructed with garages having a curved or swing driveway, with the entrance to the garage facing the side property line, shall have a minimum front setback of fifteen (15) feet. b. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit adjacent to a street is ten (10) feet, with the exception that the minimum side setback adjacent to Spring Road shall be twenty (20) feet. C. Side setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit on an interior lot, other than for exceptions listed below, shall be five (5) feet. Side setback minimum for a second story deck or balcony is ten (10) feet. d. Side setback minimum for a two- story, single- family dwelling unit on an interior lot larger OCC, 115 than seven thousand (7,000) square feet, with windows facing the adjacent property, is seven and one -half (7.5) feet, with not less than fifteen (15) feet between structures. e. Rear setback minimum for a single- family dwelling unit is twenty (20) feet, for an enclosed patio or open patio cover is ten (10) feet, for a - second story deck or balcony is twenty (20) feet, and for an accessory structure is five (5) feet. 3. Maximum building height: a. Thirty -five (35) feet for dwelling units; b. Fifteen (15) feet for accessory structures; C. Twelve (12) feet for a patio cover and second floor deck or balcony, not including railing height. 4. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code, with the exception that sound attenuation walls shall be constructed to a height as required by a city- approved noise study for the residential planned development permit. 5. Parking. Parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the city of Moorpark Municipal Code, except as otherwise noted in this chapter. 6. Signage. Signage shall comply with Chapter 17.40 of the city of Moorpark Municipal Code, except as otherwise noted in this chapter. 7. Recreational Amenities. Residential planned development permit areas with single- family lots that have an average size of less than seven - thousand (7,000) square feet shall include private recreational amenities such as, but not limited to the following: clubhouse, restrooms, swimming pool and spa, play apparatus, picnic shelter, barbecue area with seating, court game facilities (non - lighted), and multipurpose fields. The types of amenities shall be reviewed and approved with the required residential planned development permit. 8. Eaves and Window Treatments and Surrounds. The eaves and window treatments and surrounds on all sides of a structure shall be consistent with the eaves and window treatments and surrounds on the front elevation. 9. Wrap- Around Front Elevation Treatment. The architectural style and treatment included along the front elevation of a single- family unit shall continue along each side elevation until commencement of fencing or other architecturally feasible termination point as determined by the residential planned development permit approval body. OV, C111, ITEM: 9.A. MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Direct o Prepared by Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: April 9, 2004 (PC Meeting of 04/20/04) SUBJECT: Consider Recommendation to City Council on Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION This item was originally scheduled for consideration at the Planning Commission's regular meeting held on April 6, 2004. Due to the length of the hearings preceding this item, by consensus, the Planning Commission continued consideration of the Landscape Standards and Guidelines to its next regular meeting of April 20, 2004. No changes have been proposed for this project since the April 6, 2004 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. ATTACHMENT: April 6, 2004, Agenda Report, including attachments 000116 S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z 0 A \2002 \Landscape Guidelines \PC Agenda Report - cont.doc MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission /1 -7 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Direct Prepared by Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: March 17, 2004 (PC Meeting of 04/06/04) SUBJECT: Consider Recommendation to City Council on Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines BACKGROUND As part of the annual City Council Goals and Objectives, the City Council has identified, for the past several years, the need to adopt guidelines for preparation of landscape and irrigation plans. This goal is currently listed as item number F -8 on the list of departmental goals and objectives. In support of this Goal of the City Council, Community Development staff has worked with the City's Landscape Consultant to develop a series of standards and guidelines to ensure that the landscaping of new development projects, as well as, that of public facilities and streetscapes, is designed to achieve the desired outcome at maturity. DISCUSSION The attached document represents a comprehensive program for the implementation of landscape design policies and regulations which are already in existence within the City today. The benefits to be gained from these Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines will be realized by both City staff, as well as, by private land owners and developers, through the clear communication of expectations and standards pertaining to the installation and maintenance of landscaping and irrigation systems. The Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines begin with general information which pertains to all projects in the City. This information identifies points of concern which should be considered when designing the landscape and irrigation plans for any project. Issues such as water conservation, fire hazard mitigation, public ATTACHMENT 430©l:19 S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z 0 A \2002 \Landscape Guidelines \PC Agenda Report.doc Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 2 accessibility, and development of community character are addressed in a very general way, so that landscape designers can understand these concerns before considerable time is expended in design. Landscape Plan submittal requirements and processing procedures constitute the next portion of the document. These sections establish standards for submittals and outline the general processing steps to enable applicants to navigate their way through the Landscape Plan review process as easily and expeditiously as possible. The procedures and requirements sections address the format of plans, the content of submittals, and the process from the time of submittal to the final inspection of landscaping and irrigation and the release of sureties. Next, the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines identify design standards to be used for different types of projects. These project types range from public concerns such as streetscapes to private developments. Separate requirements exist for single - family residential projects, as well as, commercial and industrial projects, and treatments of utilities. Parking areas have their own requirements in the document as well. Finally, the Standards and Guidelines provide a series of aids to applicants designing and submitting plans to the City. Applications and other forms are included in the "Attachments to the Standards and Guidelines." Other helpful information is included, such as plant lists, submittal requirements, and standard details for the installation of plant materials and irrigation equipment. It should be noted that these Standards and Guidelines are intended to provide direction to applicants and guidance to staff in processing requests for landscape approval on public projects, and private commercial, industrial, institutional and residential projects. The Standards and Guidelines are not, however, intended to dictate planting requirements for individual private residential properties. While the plant lists and planting methods included in the document may prove useful to homeowners, they are not to be enforced as the only list of plants or methods acceptable to the City. Homeowners will retain their own freedom to design the landscapes on their property, subject only to property maintenance provisions of the Municipal Code and individual Homeowners Association regulations. Many of the provisions of the Standards and Guidelines use mandatory language ( "shall ") rather than directory language ( "should "), which is not typically true of "Guidelines." The OOO120 Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 3 provisions using the mandatory language are Standards to be adhered to in all instances, while the provisions with directory language are Guidelines. This fact should be viewed in light of the intent that these Guidelines be adopted as general policies, which set direction and guide both staff and applicants in the accomplishment of the goal of ensuring a pleasant and livable community, enriched with desired landscape amenities. However, in some instances, there may be situations which are better addressed by a practice which may not strictly adhere to the guidelines set forth in the document. In those situations, the Community Development Director may adjust the guidelines to best meet the needs of the City. The Commission should be aware that the Director's ability to adjust provisions in the Standards and Guidelines does not extend to those mandatory items that require compliance with other City, State, or Federal requirements, such as Title 24, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and local health and safety requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines is considered to be a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), requiring an appropriate level of environmental review. In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with CEQA. Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of a significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation cannot be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of OUrC121: Honorable Planning Commission April 6, 2004 Page 4 California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. STAFF RECOHMNDATION Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution PC -2004- ®tY 22 RESOLUTION NO. PC -2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the City Council has established a goal of developing a policy document addressing Landscape and Irrigation system design for projects on both public and private property; and WHEREAS, the adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines will serve both project applicants as well as City staff responsible for processing project applications by outlining submittal requirements, applicable standards, and processing procedures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after discussion of the matter at its regular meeting of April 6, 2004, determined that the draft Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines presented by the Community Development Department would support the objectives desired by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act by the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends to the City Council the adoption of the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. 0001.E Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 2 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2004. Scott Pozza, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit A - Draft Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines 00 01` 4 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 3 LANDSCAPE DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES CITY OF MOORPARK Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 805 - 517 -6224 ©ukC,IZ5 EXHIBIT A Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Water Conservation 1.2 Ecological Viability 1.3 Development of Community Character 1.4 Public Access and Enjoyment 1.5 Fire Mitigation SECTION 2 PROCESSING PROCEDURES 2.1 Pre - Submittal Meeting 2.2 Conceptual Landscape Package Submittal 2.3 Conceptual Plan Review and Approval 2.4 Guarantee /Surety and Exoneration of Surety 2.5 Installation and Inspection 2.6 Enforcement SECTION 3 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Plan Check Fees 3.2 General Plan Preparation Requirements 3.3 Planting Plan Requirements 3.4 Soils Analysis 3.5 Irrigation Plan Requirements 3.6 Maintenance Program SECTION 4 INSTALLATION VERIFICATION 4.1 Approved Plans /Conditions 4.2 Landscape Condition Compliance Review 4.3 Maintenance Program SECTION 5 INSTALLATION ENFORCEMENT SECTION 6 WATER BUDGET AND PROJECTED WATER USE CALCULATIONS SECTION 7 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 7.1 Parkways and Streetscapes 7.2 Median Island Planting Requirements SECTION 8 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI - FAMILY PROJECTS SECTION 9 UTILITIES SECTION 10 PARKING AREAS SECTION 11 EROSION CONTROL AND NATURAL AREAS SECTION 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 12.1 Water Efficient Model Home Requirement 12.2 Private Front Yards 12.3 Street Trees 12.4 Streetscape Concept 12.5 Wall and Fencing 00012G Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 5 ATTACHMENTS: I LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL PLAN CHECKLIST • General Plan Requirements • Slope Planting Plan Requirements • On -Site Planting Plan Requirements • Irrigation Plan Requirements • Landscape Inspection Requirements (City Maintained and Master Association) • Landscape Inspection Requirements (Sub- Association, Commercial and On -Site Areas) • City Approval Block (must be on title sheet) II GENERAL RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST III INVASIVE AND PROHIBITED PLANT LIST IV RECOMMENDED TREES FOR STREETS V REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN REIVEW VI APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT'S CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE VII CITY STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS 1 -1 Tree Planting Detail 1 -2 Tree Guying Detail 1 -3 Tree Planting on Slope Detail 1 -4 Shrub Planting Detail 1 -5 Shrub on Slope Planting Detail VIII CITY STANDARD IRRIGATION DETAILS 2 -1 Remote Control Valve Detail 2 -2 Anti- siphon Valve Detail 2 -3 Backflow Preventer Detail 2 -4 Bubbler Detail 2 -5 Pop -up Rotor Detail 2-6 Rotor On Slope Detail 2 -7 Pop -up Spray Head Detail 2 -8 Riser Spray Detail IX PLANTING DESIGN REQUIREMENT FIGURES 12 -1 Slope Planting w/View Fence (Elevation) 12 -2 Slope Planting w /Screen Wall (Elevation) 12 -3 Slope Planting at Single - Family Residence (Plan View) 12 -4 Slope Planting a Multi - Family Residence (Plan View) OUC127 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 6 SECTION 1 GENERAL The purpose of this guide is to assist in the preparation of landscape plans while incorporating water conservation measures, design aesthetics and landscape consistency throughout the City of Moorpark. It has been prepared by the City of Moorpark Community Development Department as a guide for use by landscape architects and others involved with the development of projects within the City. These standards and guidelines include water use requirements and the City's minimum landscape standards established to create a sense of community character. The landscape plans must meet the basic criteria within these standards and guidelines. Items which utilize mandatory language ( "shall ") are considered standards and must be adhered to. Additionally, certain projects may be required to exceed the minimum standards to achieve specific objectives. The items which utilize directory language ( "should ") are considered guidelines, and may be interpreted with some flexibility to meet goals which result in community benefit. The Community Development Director may waive any guidelines as deemed necessary and appropriate. 1.1 Water Conservation Water conservation through landscaping offers the greatest single opportunity for water savings in the urban area. About forty percent (40 %) of urban water is used to irrigate landscaped areas in California. A water - efficient landscape includes water efficient (drought tolerant) plants, efficient irrigation systems, proper soil preparation, responsive maintenance and watering schedules, and reuse of water (wherever possible) such as grey water, reclaimed or recycled water systems. Water - efficient design can both reduce project costs and reduce the amount of water usage for landscaping. Due to the increasing demand for water and the limited supply in Ventura County and within the City of Moorpark, water - efficient landscaping shall be required in new developments and existing developments undergoing significant modifications. Included within these standards and guidelines are Water Budget and Projected Water Use Calculations as well as a list of City approved plants and their suggested landscape use. The applicant may expand upon the material list with approval by the Community Development Director, but all suggestions must meet the basic criteria within the standards and guidelines, including: • Drought tolerant planting; • Limitation of lawn areas; • Efficient irrigation; • Proper soil preparation, including use of mulch • Responsive maintenance and watering schedule; • Use of surfaces that allow percolation of stormwater, such as turfcrete, gravel, porous pavements, vegetative groundcover, mulch, etc; • Surface drainage through bioswales; and • Stormwater storage for reuse onsite, such as cisterns. 0 1*: C125 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 7 1.2 Ecological Viability The landscape plans should incorporate sensible conservation of public resources, including water, soil, biodiversity, energy resources, air quality, agricultural, recreational and wildlife open space, and other such resources in the public interest. Judicious conservation is cost - effective in both project construction and maintenance. Landscape plans that incorporate conservation also integrate with the character of the City's community and environs. The applicant is encouraged to take full advantage of the wide range of possibilities in design and technology within the framework established by this guide. A list of invasive and prohibited plants is provided (Attachment III). The Community Development Director or his /her designee may allow usage of select plants on this list in landscape areas that do not interface with sensitive ecological zones. Methods of increasing ecological viability include: • Reduced disturbance of soil and natural terrain through minimizing grading and working with the natural topography as much as possible; • Narrower road design and layouts with shorter road lengths, to reduce infrastructure costs and impermeable surfaces, as well as to increase opportunity to conserve natural resources, viewsheds and other space- requiring amenities in newly developed areas; • Native topsoil conservation and renewal, by saving topsoil and replacing it after grading, by re- vegetating with native plants, and other landscape regeneration methods; • Minimization of runoff via on -site stormwater retention /infiltration through open - bottom and vegetated swales and /or detention /retention basins, and other aesthetically enriching project amenities; • Slope stabilization with appropriate vegetation; • Use of drought - tolerant non - invasive native plants adjacent to designated natural resource areas and waterways; • Use of recycled materials of local origin for hardscaping, mulching and /or soil amendments; • Protection of viewsheds and open space areas; and • Multiple uses for landscapes, such as stormwater parks, to maximize available land area and natural resources, and to increase the quality of public service or economic opportunity. 1.3 Development of Community Character It is the intent of these standards and guidelines to provide a sense of community character that is compatible with the City's culture and environment, and to strengthen the perception of the community as a unique place. The aim of community character development is to create and enhance a community identity, to increase the enjoyment and sense of community among the public, and to enhance the image of the community as a desirable place to live, work and shop. OC C129 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 8 a. Design with consistency and maintain a high standard of aesthetics: 1. Design elements should complement the architectural theme. 2. Private and public uses should be visually separate, but aesthetically consistent. 3. Public and Private streets should take on an individual appearance with a common street tree and design intent. 4. Landscape areas and streetscape should include 'surprises' such as a large focal tree. b. Introduce design ideas that complement the City's cultural heritage and natural history such as: 1. 'ranch' style and early Spanish architecture; 2. natural landscape elements such as native trees and shrubs; 3. natural building material such as river rock and boulders; 4. the City's agricultural heritage; 5. the railroad; 6. the arroyo; and 7. local chaparral and riparian plant communities. C. Integrate conservation and efficiency whenever possible, to enhance enjoyment of the unique characteristics of the area, such as: 1. mild, sunny climate; 2. maritime weather patterns; 3. distinctive shape of the existing terrain; 4. viewsheds; 5. beauty of local natural history; and 6. local building materials. 1.4 Public Access and Enjoyment The landscape plans shall meet all Title 24 and ADA accessibility requirements as well as all applicable codes for fire and building in order to promote health, safety and community welfare. The intent of these standards and guidelines is to universally provide safe access for use and enjoyment, on new projects and on modifications of existing projects. a. ADA accessibility and Title 24 requirements shall be incorporated for public, commercial and industrial projects, for both new projects and modification of existing projects. b. Landscapes shall be viable, functional and attractive, to provide universal access, use and enjoyment. Landscapes shall provide for the health, safety and welfare of the community, through compliance with all applicable ordinances for fire, health and safety. 0(,T130 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 9 C. In addition to ADA accessibility, landscapes should be designed for specific user populations as needed, whether for an elderly population, youth, or for specific disabilities such as blindness. Specific landscape functions and amenities should be considered. Examples include: 1. raised beds to wheelchair height and reach for handicapped and elderly access in a community garden; 2. casual seating located along pedestrian ways positioned for "people watching", such as benches, steps, planters or grassy slopes, with a view onto a park, plaza or street; and 3. textured surfaces along pedestrian ways to guide non - sighted pedestrians. _ d. Landscapes shall enhance the microclimate and character of pedestrian ways and gathering places by adequately providing the following: shade, from trees or from overhead structures; 2. screening; 3. seating; 4. lighting; 5. circulation, including adequate separation of pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian and vehicular circulation; and 6. attractive gathering spaces with focal amenities. 1.5 Fire Mitigation A Fuel Modification Plan may be required when a proposed project contains or is bounded by hazardous native vegetation as determined by the Ventura County Prevention District, This plan will demonstrate how the proposed project will mitigate potential fire hazards. The final Fuel Modification Plan shall be submitted in conjunction with landscape plans prior to review by the City. The final approved Fuel Modification Plan may take precedence over these standards and guidelines. SECTION 2 PROCESSING PROCEDURES 2.1 Pre - Submittal Meeting A pre - submittal meeting familiarizes the applicant with the review process, and identifies the information and materials necessary to file landscape plans. A pre - submittal meeting can be arranged by contacting the case planner at the Community Development Department. 2.2 Conceptual Landscape Package Submittal After the applicant has prepared all the information identified during the pre - submittal meeting, the landscape package shall be formally submitted with the required fee deposit in accordance with fee schedule and signed Reimbursement Agreement. (See Attachment V) Elements to be included in the conceptual landscape plan package are as follows: Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 10 a. existing trees and shrubs to be removed and /or protect in place; b. structures or buildings to be removed and /or protect in place; C. tree, Shrub and Groundcover Plant Palette; d. street tree plan; e. general plant sizes and locations; f. all design elements, site features and flatwork, including elevations or perspective drawings of those features; g. project entry monumentation layout and elevations or perspective drawings. h. walls and fences including details; i. paving and walkways; j. color and material schedule. Samples should be included for City to review; k. all site amenities. At a minimum, the site amenities should reference color and material (i.e. wood, metal, etc.); site and landscape lighting; M. preliminary parking lot shading plan if applicable. Plan should address all four seasons (refer to Section 10); and n. preliminary utility screening plan (refer to Section 9). 2.3 Conceptual Plan Review and Approval Upon receipt of the landscape package, the City's case planner shall review it for completeness and forward it to the City's consulting landscape architect for review. The consultant's review, which normally takes two weeks, consists of an on -site inspection and package review for consistency with City standards as outlined by this guide. Upon completion of the review, the consultant returns the package to the Planning Division with recommendations for approval or modification. This process is repeated until approval is achieved. Based upon the recommendations of the City's consulting landscape architect and case planner, the Community Development Director shall approve the project's landscape package. 2.4 Guarantee /Surety and Exoneration of Surety A surety bond may be required as a condition of approval in the following cases: a. To assure plant viability at least one year after installation. b. To assure installation of plants after issuance of a Zoning Clearance by the Planning Division and Certificate of Occupancy by Building and Safety. (This would normally be allowed only on non - sloped areas of residential projects where the applicant is providing landscaping). If, upon final landscape inspection, the Community Development Director determines that the landscaping and irrigation have been installed in accordance with the approved plans, the Community Development Director may recommend that the guarantee /surety be returned to the applicant. 0 k 132 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 11 2.5 Installation and Inspection Landscaping for commercial, industrial and residential sloped areas shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City Building and Safety Division. The applicant's landscape architect shall be required to certify in writing to the Community Development Director that all work has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications (Attachment VI). The City's landscape consultant will conduct the final landscape inspection after receipt of the certification. (See Section 4 - Installation Verification and Attachment I - Landscape Submittal Plan Checklist & Landscape Inspection Requirements) 2.6 Compliance Discretionary development permits may be conditioned for follow -up inspections to verify a maintenance program, water management auditing, or compliance with environmental mitigation measures. Failure by the applicant, successor in interest, or homeowner's association to maintain installed common area landscaping and/or irrigation systems will constitute a violation of the Conditions of Approval and /or Mitigation Measures of the development permit. SECTION 3 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The project's landscape package shall be prepared by a California Registered Landscape Architect, unless waived by the Community Development Director. Plans must be wet - stamped, signed and dated. Plan submittals shall include the following: (see Attachment I - Landscape Plan Review Checklist) 3.1 Plan Check Fees The applicant shall pay the deposit fee in accordance with the fee schedule and submit a signed reimbursement agreement to cover landscape review and inspection. Fees shall include costs of any required follow -up inspections. (See Attachment V - Reimbursement Agreement for Plan Review) 3.2 General Plan Preparation Requirements (See Attachment I - Landscape Plan Review Checklist) a. Base Sheets: Plans shall be drawn on clear and legible base sheets prepared especially for the landscape submittal. 2. Plans shall not exceed 30" x 42" or be less than 22" x 36" in size. 3. Base Sheets should accurately and clearly show the following existing and proposed features: a) property lines; b) streets, street rights -of -way, access easements and /or public or private driveways, walkways, bike paths, and any other paved areas; C) all existing and proposed buildings and structures; Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 12 d) parking areas, lighting, striping, curbs and wheel stops; e) all existing and proposed trees, shrubs and other significant landscape features; i.e., water courses, rock outcroppings, etc.; f) grading areas; top and toe of slopes, slope direction (engineer's Precise Grading plans must included with submittal); g) all Utilities, including street lighting, fire hydrants, transformers, electric meters, irrigation equipment, air conditioning units, etc.; h) existing native vegetation, on -site and on contiguous parcels, may be shown in a generalized manner; and i) Fire Clearance Zone, if applicable (Approved Fuel Modification Plan must be included with submittal). b. Scale: The scale shall not be smaller than 1"=20' unless prior approval is received from the Community Development Director. C. Title Block: A title block shall be included on all plans indicating the names, addresses and phone numbers of the applicant and the landscape architect. The title block shall include a north arrow and scale for each sheet. Each sheet shall be clearly labeled. The title block shall include the California Registered Landscape Architect's seal. Each sheet shall be 'wet- signed' for final approval. d. Title Sheet: Content of the Title Sheet shall include the following: 1. Project Title; 2. Title block; 3. Vicinity Map; 4. Location Map; 5. Sheet Index; 6. Landscape Approval Block (see Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist); 7. Landscape Inspection Schedule (see Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist); e. Other Items. 1. One (1) copy of the engineer's precise grading plans shall be included with the landscape submittal. 2. The final Fuel Modification Plan shall be included with the landscape submittal if applicable. 3.3 Planting Plan Requirements (See Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) Plan Preparation Requirements: a. A Horticultural Soils Analysis with recommendations shall be attached to the landscape plans. (See Section 3.4 below) 0�� 31 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 13 b. The plans must include notation that a ninety (90) day maintenance period is required and that expenses are to be paid for by the owner. C. The planting plan shall include maintenance notes on either the plans or in the specifications. d. Planting specifications shall be included. e. Existing and proposed grades and drainage elements are shown f. All design elements shown on the approved Landscape Concept Plan; i.e. recreational areas, outdoor eating areas, trails, etc. g. Location and spacing of all plants are clearly identified. h. Common and botanical names of all plants are listed. i. Size and quantity of all plants are listed. j. Seed mix information including: 1. rate; 2. mix; 3. mulch; 4. binder; 5. fertilization; and 6. inoculation. k. Planting details I. General planting notes M. Planting specifications n. Maintenance notes (see Section 4) 3.4 Soils Analysis A soils report performed by a laboratory that is a member of the California Association of Agricultural Laboratories shall be attached to the landscape plans. The soil sample tested shall be taken after site grading and the date of the sample shall be included on the report. The planting backfill mixture and soil amendments shall be based on this analysis. Use of soil amendments produced from recycled yard trimmings and /or organic wastes of local origin is encouraged, whenever feasible. The report shall include the following: a. Determination of soil texture indicating the percentage of organic matter shall be indicated. b. An approximate determination of the soil infiltration rate shall be indicated. A range of infiltration rates should be noted, where appropriate C. Measure of pH and total soluble salts shall be indicated. d. Amendments and recommendations for improving water - holding properties shall be noted. Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 14 3.5 Irrigation Plan Requirements (See Attachment I — Landscape Plan Review Checklist) All landscape areas shall be provided with an approved irrigation system that meets the requirements of this section. Specific site conditions and proposed landscape materials will determine the design of the irrigation system. The irrigation system shall deliver water efficiently and uniformly. All equipment shall be designed for installation per manufacturer's recommendation, and conform to Uniform Plumbing Codes and all local regulations. a. When considering design alternatives, the following criteria shall be utilized: 1. Head -to -head coverage: The irrigation design shall provide adequate "head -to -head" and sufficient water for the continued healthy growth of all proposed plantings with a minimum of waste or overspray on adjoining areas. 2. Reduced Pressure Backflow Device: Notation shall be on the landscape plan that the backflow device must be tested at a minimum of once a year. All backflow devices shall be installed in a mesh enclosure with green or tan powder coating. 3. Uniform distribution: The distribution of uniformity of an installed sprinkler system shall meet or exceed seventy percent (70 %). 4. Controllers: Automatic irrigation controllers are required with separate programs for each landscape area with a different irrigation need. Controllers shall be capable of controlling the operating time for each circuit, the starting time and daily schedule of operation. Each controller must be able to accommodate multiple schedules and contain fourteen (14) -day minimum clocks; percentage switches; repeat cycles; the ability to schedule by the day of the week; and rain sensing override devices. A watering schedule shall be placed in each controller. 5. Soil moisture sensors: Soil moisture sensing devices are suggested in representative areas of the landscape plan. 6. Point irrigation: Drip emitters and bubblers are recommended for trees and shrubs. 7. Runoff and overspray: Soil types and percolation rate shall be considered when designing irrigation systems. All irrigation systems shall be designed to avoid runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent areas, walks, roadways, or structures. The water application rate shall attempt to match the infiltration rate of the soil. Repeat cycles shall be utilized in an effort to avoid runoff. Sprinkler heads should be properly located to minimize landscape water overspray or runoff onto hardscape, unplanted areas, or areas of dissimilar water needs. 8. Quick couplers: Quick couplers or hose bibs are required at one - hundred foot (100') intervals throughout the project. 000.130 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 15 9. Sprinkler heads: Sprinkler heads shall be selected for proper area coverage, precipitation rate, operating pressure, adjustment capability, and ease of maintenance. Heads or emitters shall have matched precipitation rates within ten percent (10 %) for each control valve circuit. Above ground risers are not allowed next to sidewalks, driveways, or curbs and are discouraged anywhere people can easily access; these sprinklers must be the pop -up type. In areas less than six feet wide, drip emitters and bubblers are recommended. 10. Rain sensing override devices: Rain sensing override devices are required on all irrigation systems. 11. Back -up System: The irrigation system shall be installed with a back -up system should an operating valve fail to shutoff or a break in the mainline occurs. The back up system should either consist of a normally open master valve with flow meter or a normally closed master valve. On large irrigation systems, a normally open master valve with flow meter will be required. 12. Piping: Plastic (PVC) mainline piping requires placement not less than 18" below final grade and minimum twenty -four inches (24 ") below finish surface of streets, with lateral lines requiring 12" depth. UVR (Ultra Violet Resistant) above ground pipe shall only be installed on slope areas. Galvanized lines shall be above ground. Other piping shall be considered for drip or temporary irrigation. Piping for reclaimed water systems shall follow current County Health and State Health standards for pipe color, depth and separation. All irrigation piping under streets or flatwork shall be sleeved with sch 40 PVC minimum two (2) times the diameter of the pipe enclosed. 13. Water meters: Landscape irrigation systems shall be on a separate water meter unless waived by the Community Development Director. A separate meter provides for monitoring of landscape irrigation efficiency. 14. Reclaimed water: If reclaimed water is available, and if installation is determined to be feasible and is approved by the Ventura Councy Environmental Health Division in conjunction with the local water purveyor, a reclaimed irrigation system shall be installed. b. Plan Preparation Requirements 1. Irrigation Plans shall be separate from Planting Plans, and shall have clear graphic indication of all system components with an irrigation legend on each sheet and shall include the following: a) equipment manufacturer; b) type of equipment; C) model number; d) precipitation rate; e) size; f) gallon per minute (GPM) demand; Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 16 g) pounds per square inch (p.s.i.) demand; h) radius of cover for each head type; i) name and telephone number of the water purveyor; j) design and static water pressure (contact water company) and note reference engineer and date; k) point of connection (location and size); 1) backflow protection as approved by Ventura County Environmental Health; m) controllers, including number of stations; n) remote control valves including gallonage requirement, piping, heads and quick couplers (or hose bibs); o) pipe sizes indicated numerically (i.e. % ", 3/4", etc.); and P) rain shut off device. 2. The plans shall include the landscape inspection requirements. The inspection schedule shall be included on the Title Sheet. (See Attachment 1) 3. The plans shall include an irrigation schedule. 4. Worst case pressure loss calculation for the circuit with the highest demand, farthest distance from the POC and highest elevation shall be provided. 5. Details and specifications shall be provided for all irrigation system components. 3.6 Maintenance Program Landscapes of residential common areas and commercial or industrial projects shall be carefully and competently maintained to ensure water efficiency and high quality appearance. A watering schedule encased in plastic shall be kept inside each controller (with reduced as -built plans showing hydro- zones). Maintenance guideline notes must appear on the planting plan drawings. Using these standards and guidelines, a schedule for ongoing maintenance shall be prepared and shown on the planting plan. The maintenance guidelines shall be as follows: Post - installation Maintenance Standards and Guidelines a. Any alterations to the landscape must be approved by the Community Development Director. b. Control all harmful diseases and pests. All chemical applications must be per state licensed advisors and applications. C. Pruning shall be done to keep plants within special limitations, removal of deadwood, cross - branching, etc., per International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) standards. Plants shall never be sheared unless specified on the approved plan. 000-13S Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 17 Trees are to be allowed to grow to the designed size to provide maximum shading of paved areas. d. Water shall be applied for optimum plant growth with minimal runoff or overspray. Adjust controllers per current California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) data. Information can be obtained at www.cimis.ca.QOV . e. Always replace heads with the same kind of head, or head with a matching precipitation rate. f. Backflow device shall be tested and certified annually by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. g. Inspect tree supports frequently, and remove as soon as the plants will stand - without support and will be able to resist wind damage. Never allow support materials to girdle the trunk or branches. h. Landscape irrigation shall be scheduled during the night or early morning hours. i. A regular maintenance schedule shall include checking, adjusting, and repairing the irrigation equipment; aerating and de- thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; weeding; and removing litter in all landscaped areas. SECTION 4 INSTALLATION VERIFICATION 4.1 Approved Plans /Conditions Copies of the approved landscape plans and conditions are kept and available at the City of Moorpark, Community Development Department. 4.2 Landscape Condition Compliance Review Prior to completion of the landscaping and prior to final inspection, the City's landscape consultant shall inspect the site and certify that the landscape complies with these standards and guidelines per the attached inspection schedule (see Attachment 1). The applicant shall notify the City a minimum of forty -eight (48) hours prior to inspection. Upon completion of the installation of the landscaping and prior to final inspection, the applicant's landscape consultant shall inspect the site and certify that the landscape complies with these standards and guidelines. Certification shall be accomplished by completing the Certificate of Compliance checklist (see attachment VII). Concurrently or afterwards, the City's landscape consultant shall inspect the landscape planting and irrigation installations for final conformance with the approved plans and specifications. The applicant must also employ a certified backflow tester to certify the backflow device. A second inspection of residential common areas, commercial or industrial projects shall be conducted by the City's landscape consultant one year after certification to assure condition compliance including irrigation efficiency and plant viability. 4.3 Maintenance Program Landscapes of residential common areas, commercial or industrial projects shall be carefully and competently maintained to ensure water efficiency and high quality appearance. A watering schedule and as -built plans shall be encased in plastic and shall be kept in each controller. 000139 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 18 SECTION 5 CONTINUED COMPLIANCE REQUIRED The applicant, successor in interest, or homeowner's association shall maintain installed landscaping and efficient irrigation systems in compliance with the Conditions of Approval and /or Mitigation Measures of the development permit. SECTION 6 WATER BUDGET AND PROJECTED WATER USE CALCULATIONS Each landscape plan must have a water budget and projected water use calculations. Each project site is allowed a certain amount of water based upon the climate of the site and the total square footage of the planting area. Any plant can be used, provided the combined projected water use of all the plants does not exceed the water budget. A water budget calculation is based on the site's size and the reference Evapotranspiration (ET) factor. Included in the calculation of ET factors are evapotranspiration rates, precipitation rates, a crop coefficient and an allowance for uniformity. The reference ET factors within Ventura County are available at the CIMIS website at www.cimis.ca.gov . The water budget and projected water use calculations shall be submitted as part of the irrigation plan. The projected water use shall not exceed the water budget. A reproducible hydro -zone map showing separation of planting areas with plant factors shall be submitted as part of the landscape package. Areas such as parks, golf courses or school yards where turf provides a playing surface may require additional water. A statement to that effect shall be included with the planting plan, designating areas to be set aside for such purposes. The designated recreation area may receive more water than the water budget allows on a case -by -case basis. Such additional allocation shall be consistent with Ventura County's policy regarding the use of reclaimed water for golf courses. Calculating the Water Budget of a Project Site A site's water budget is determined by multiplying the square footage of the planting area by the site's ET factor. After you have determined how much water is in your budget, you can then calculate the projected water use of your proposed planting plan. To calculate the water budget of a site use this formula: Water Budget (Gallons/Year) = (ET) x (.8) x (LA) x (.62) Water Budget = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gal /yr) ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches/yr) .8 = ET Adjustment Factor LA = Landscaped Area (in square feet) .62 = Conversion Factor (to gal. /sq. ft.) This formula is based on California state law (Assembly Bill 325). Calculating the Project Water Use of a Landscape Plan: The total amount of projected water use should be less than or equal to the site's water budget. To determine the plant factor, multiply the plant factor of each planting hydro- 03CA40 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 19 zone by its square footage. Then add the results and complete the calculation of projected water use for the entire planting area. Generalized plant factors are: .3 = low water using plants, .5 = average water using plants, and .8 = high water using plants. These factors must be agreed upon by the designer and the City. If a plant is not on the list, an equivalency determination will be made by the Community Development Director. Any changes in the irrigation system or landscape will require new water projections. To calculate the projected water use of a landscape plan, use this formula: Projected Water Use (Gallons /year) _ (ET) x r(PF) x (HA)l x (.62) IE ETo = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches/year) PF = Plant Factor (.1 low through .9 high) HA = Hydro -zone Area (square feet) (.62) = Conversion Factor (to gallons/square foot) IE = Irrigation Efficiency (minimum .625) For the purpose of determining the projected water use, irrigation efficiency is assumed to be 0.625 or better. Irrigation systems shall be designed, maintained and managed to meet or exceed 0.625 efficiency. If the plant factors average 0.5, the water budget will be met at an irrigation efficiency of 0.625. SECTION 7 PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY Special attention should be given to the planning and design of areas that are to be maintained by the City and /or are within the public right -of -way. These areas should utilize drought tolerant planting material, planting material that is low maintenance and utilize water conservation techniques without compromising the aesthetics of the design. 7.1 Parkways and streetscapes The design and layout of the streetscape is not only important to identify and individualize the project area, but also to capture the characteristics of Moorpark. The following goals should be considered: • The street tree should be of the same species for each street to promote consistency and area identity. • The streetscape must be designed with parkways. • Sidewalks should meander whenever possible. • Secondary trees outside of the right -of -way should consist of randomly spaced tree groves and informal massings. • Trees and shrubs should be chosen to provide varying texture, color and form. • The landscaping should be consistent with the architectural theme. • Shrub plantings should consist of layers of planting of varying heights. a. General Streetscape Requirements 00C11111 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 20 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. and one (1) tree per four - hundred (400) s.f., exclusive of street trees located within the parkway area. 2. Shrubs shall be minimum 5- gallon size. 3. Accent and perennials shall be located in groupings or massings along the planting edges at a distance not to exceed twenty feet (20') on center. The accent and perennial groupings are exclusive of the shrub - planting requirement. Accent and perennial plant massings shall consist of minimum 1- gallon container size plants with a minimum of twenty -five (25) plants per grouping. Larger groupings at a distance greater than thirty feet (30') may be installed provided the plant quantities are met. 4. With the exception of street trees and median island trees, the minimum tree size is 15- gallon. 5. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 6. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1 ") depth of bark mulch. 7. Turf may be allowed within the parkway area but not in the median island areas. 8. All planting shall be drought tolerant and low maintenance. 9. Six -inch (6 ") wide concrete headers shall be installed between turf and shrub areas. 10. Turf shall not be installed on slopes that exceed a 4:1 ratio. b. Street Tree Requirements 1. Street trees should be spaced according to the mature canopy size of the tree, but in no circumstance should the spacing exceed thirty feet (30') on center without City approval. 2. Street trees shall be minimum 24" box size with minimum 1 1/" caliper. Trees shall be between eight (8') to twelve (12') height with a minimum two foot (2') wide spread. 3. Trees shall be standard trunk, not multi- trunk. 4. All street trees within ten feet (10') of walks, curbs, or other hardscape areas shall be installed with a linear root barrier ten feet (10') in length by twenty -four inch (24 ") in depth installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree trunk. 5. Trees shall be located per the sight distance requirements established by the City Engineer at intersections. Unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer, street trees shall not be closer than twenty -five (25') to the back of curb return. 000142 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 21 6. Street trees shall be located no less than five feet (5') from curbs, sidewalks and other hardscape areas, unless they are located in parkways. 7. Street trees shall be located no less than ten feet (10') from utility poles and light standards, fire hydrants, utility structures and driveway aprons. 8. Trees that may exceed twenty feet (20') vertical height at maturity shall not be located under utility lines. 7.2 Median Island Planting Requirements a. General Requirements 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. and one (1) tree per four - hundred (400) s.f. 2. Shrubs shall consist of minimum 5- gallon container sizes. 3. In median islands ten feet (10') wide or greater, accent and perennials shall be located in massings along the planting edges at a distance not to exceed thirty feet (30') on center and shall be exclusive of the shrub - planting requirement. Accent and perennial plant massings shall consist of minimum 1- gallon container size plants with a minimum of twenty -five (25) plants per grouping. Larger groupings at a distance greater than thirty feet (30') may be installed provided the plant quantities are met. 4. Median island trees shall be minimum seventy-five percent (75 %) 24" box size and twenty -five percent (25 %) 15- gallon container sizes. 5. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 6. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum 1" depth of bark mulch. 7. Turf is not allowed in the median islands. 8. All planting shall be drought tolerant and low maintenance. 9. All trees shall be installed with a linear root barrier ten feet (10') in length by twenty-four inch (24 ") in depth installed against the hardscape area centered on the tree trunk. b. Planting Design Requirements 1. Median island trees shall consist of a variety of tree species of varying form, texture and color. Flowering and canopy trees are encouraged. 2. Trees shall be located per the sight distance requirements established by the City Engineering Department. Trees shall not be installed adjacent to a turn pocket. 3. Shrubs located adjacent to the turn pocket shall not exceed eighteen inches (18 ") in height. Larger shrubs are permitted at a distance of twenty feet (20') from the beginning of the turn pocket, but shall not exceed thirty inches (30 ") in height. Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 22 4. Turf is not permitted in median islands. 5. An eighteen -inch (18 ") wide hardscape edge shall be installed along the entire length of the median island adjacent to the curb for maintenance. The hardscape band shall consist of either colored, stamped concrete, or concrete pavers, to match the architectural theme of the project. SECTION 8 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MULTI - FAMILY PROJECTS Landscape screening is particularly important with respect to commercial, industrial and multi - family street frontages. The large building mass, parking areas and maintenance staging areas are all relatively visible from the street frontage and require landscaping to soften the architecture and screen utility structures. a. General Planting Requirements 1. Minimum percentage of landscape coverage shall be provided within on- site parking areas consistent with Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per one - hundred (100) s.f. and one (1) tree per five - hundred (500) s.f., exclusive of street trees located within the parkway area. 3. Shrubs shall consist of eighty percent (80 %) 5- gallon and twenty percent (20 %) 1- gallon of each variety. 4. Turf shall not exceed ten percent (10 %) of the total landscape area, exclusive of the parkway area. 5. Large groupings of accent, perennials and annuals are encouraged. 6. Trees shall be a minimum seventy -five percent (75 %) 24" box and twenty - five percent (25 %) 15- gallon. 7. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 8. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1 ") depth of bark mulch. 9. The planting palette shall be consistent with these standards and guidelines. 10. Turf shall not be installed on slopes that exceed 4:1. b. Planting Design Requirements. 1. The landscape buffer shall consist of tall vertical trees adjacent to the building and lower canopy trees adjacent to the street frontage. 2. The tree planting shall consist of a mixture of evergreen, deciduous and flowering trees. 3. All utilities, trash enclosures, maintenance staging areas, etc. shall be screened from view. OUC144 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 23 4. A parkway with street trees shall be installed at the street frontage. 5. Large specimen trees and enhanced landscaping shall be located at the entry locations. Specimen trees shall be minimum 36" box size. 6. Parking areas should be screened from public view from the street. SECTION 9 UTILITIES To reduce the visibility of generally unattractive utility equipment, landscape screening shall be incorporated. For the purpose of these standards and guidelines, utility structures are any appurtenances that are above ground and have been installed in conjunction with new construction or are existing and part of a newly renovated project (i.e. electric meters, transformers, irrigation equipment, air conditioning units, etc.). The landscape plans shall identify all utility structures on site and provide appropriate screening. a. General Design Requirements 1. All utility structures shall be screened from view with appropriate landscaping. 2. Utility structures shall utilize camouflage, disguising the facility as a natural or more aesthetically pleasing man -made object to soften its visual impact on its surroundings. 3. Access to utility structures shall be maintained, while at least seventy -five (75 %) of the shall be screened from view. 4. Bollards shall not be installed with any new utility equipment unless required by governing agency. 5. All utility equipment shall be located at the rear of the property. 6. All utility equipment shall be located in shrub areas with a minimum of three feet (3') clear distance around all sides for appropriate landscape screening. 7. Screening shall take into consideration traffic sight distance requirements established by the City Engineer. SECTION 10 PARKING AREAS Parking lots should be designed to provide ease of access and safety as well as to enhance the visual quality of the City. The ultimate goal of the design is to provide a safe environment, minimize the visual appearance of the large expanse of asphalt and to reduce glare, ambient temperature and traffic noise. a. General Design Requirements A minimum of fifteen percent (15 %) of the total parking area shall consist of landscaping. Landscaping shall be computed on the basis of the net parking facility, which includes parking stalls (covered and uncovered), aisles and walkways, but does not include required landscaping adjacent to streets and within the public right -of -way. �iJ' �4 �.'• 1 °Y J Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 24 2. All parking rows shall terminate with a planter or island that is a minimum of five -foot (5) width. Parking rows shall not exceed forty feet (40') in length without the addition of a planter finger or island. 3. A minimum of one (1) tree per every four (4) stalls is required to meet the shade requirement. 4. There shall be a minimum of one (1) shrub per ten (10) s.f. 5. Shrubs shall consist of eighty percent (80 %) 5- gallon size and twenty percent (20 %) 1- gallon size. 6. Interior shrub planting shall not exceed thirty inches (30 ") in height. 7. Turf is not allowed in parking areas. 8. Additional groupings of accent plants and perennials are required. 9. The minimum tree size is 24" box. 10. All shrub areas shall be installed with flatted groundcover unless the landscape is installed with container plantings that will fill in within one year. 11. All shrub areas shall be installed with minimum one -inch (1 ") depth of bark mulch. 12. The planting palette shall be consistent with these standards and guidelines. b. Planting Design Requirements 1. The parking area and parked cars shall be adequately screened from view from the street frontage with landscaping. 2. There shall be a minimum of fifty percent (50 %) tree shade coverage of the parking area. This is determined at two- thirds (2/3) tree maturity or fifteen (15) years after installation. 3. A shade coverage exhibit must be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. 4. A minimum of one (1) 'finger' planter, five feet (6) in width, shall be provided at a minimum of every forty (40) lineal feet, and at the end of every parking aisle. 5. A minimum of one (1) 'diamond' planter shall be provided at every fourth stall within the parking area or as needed to obtain the shade coverage requirement. 6. A minimum of one (1) 'finger' planter, five feet (6) in width, shall be provided at every eight (8) stalls adjacent to the building or street frontage. Additional tree massings shall be included adjacent to these areas to provide the shade coverage required. 7. Decorative paving material is encouraged to break up the large expanse of concrete or asphalt. 00014G Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 25 8. Landscape areas shall be designed so as to discourage pedestrians from crossing any landscape areas to reach building entrances or parked vehicles. 9. Landscape islands shall be designed with walkways that encourage pedestrian circulation through the parking area. 10. Wheel stops are not allowed. 11. An eighteen inch (18 ") wide concrete band adjacent to the access side of the vehicle shall be installed adjacent to the median island curb for pedestrian access. 12. Median islands shall be a minimum of five feet (5) wide without a walkway and fifteen feet (16) wide with a five -foot (5'), walkway not including the curb. SECTION 11 EROSION CONTROL AND NATURAL AREAS Erosion control landscaping is required to reduce soil erosion and excessive runoff due to construction activities. Erosion control landscaping can also provide an aesthetically pleasing hillside with the proper selection of plant material and design intent. a. General Design Requirements 1. Slope planting design should incorporate three (3) levels of vegetation: ground cover, shrubs and trees. Each planting level should provide varying levels of height, texture and color. 2. 'Ornamental' orchards are strongly discouraged and shall only be considered on a case -by -case basis and accompanied by a long -term care and maintenance plan. 3. A minimum five -foot (5) wide Transition Zone of ornamental planting shall separate streets or sidewalks from native areas. The planting species chosen for these areas shall not be invasive or subject to naturalizing and shall be drought tolerant. 4. Pepper Trees are strongly discouraged except as specimen trees within the historic downtown area. 5. Eucalyptus Trees are strongly discouraged and shall only be considered on a case -by -case basis. 6. All manufactured slopes, three feet (3') or greater in vertical height, shall be planted with groundcover from cuttings, shrubs and trees. Hydroseed may be considered adjacent to naturalized areas with prior City approval. 7. All manufactured slopes, five feet (5') or greater in vertical height, shall be installed with jute mesh or equal per City approval. 8. Shrubs on slopes shall be planted at a minimum of one (1) shrub per one - hundred (100) square feet. 9. Trees on slopes shall be planted at a minimum of one (1) tree per three - hundred -fifty (350) square feet. 00014 7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 26 10. Minimum tree size is seventy -five percent (75 %) 15- gallon and twenty -five percent (25 %) 24" box. 11. Minimum shrub size is sixty percent (60 %) 5- gallon and forty percent (40 %) 1- gallon. 12. All slopes planted with cuttings shall be treated with a pre- emergent herbicide per the manufacturer's recommendations and must be identified on the landscape plans. 13. Any existing slope area cleared by construction activity shall, at a minimum, be "'re- vegetated" with a hydroseed mix and temporary irrigation system. The restoration requirement for cleared areas will be per the City's discretion. At a minimum the cleared area shall be restored to its original condition. 14. All existing vegetation shall be retained to the greatest extent possible. The City shall determine mitigation measures for the loss of existing trees. 15. To the greatest extent possible, existing trees that cannot be preserved shall be relocated on site. 16. All manufactured slopes shall be permanently irrigated with an automatic irrigation system. 17. Unimproved disturbed and slope areas shall be landscaped within one - hundred- eighty (180) days following the issuance of a grading permit and /or within thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 18. Temporary slope erosion control plans are required if the unimproved areas are not permanently planted and irrigated through the rainy season. 19. All slope erosion control plans, temporary slope erosion control plans and landscape plans that include disturbed areas, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20. All hardscape structures such as bench drains and slough walls shall be designed to blend into the hillside with matching colored concrete or masonry color. 21. All hardscape structures shall be screened with plant material. 22. Slope landscaping shall not be accepted by the City until 100% planting coverage has been attained. b. Planting Design Requirements 1. Slope planting shall promote varying height, mass, texture, color and form. Large masses of shrubs shall be designed in groupings. 2. The slope planting must reinforce the theme of the hillside area. 3. Plant material shall reinforce the natural hillside terrain and /or general manufactured topography. 000148 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 27 4. Low growing and medium size shrubs shall be placed at the lower slope areas in large massings. Medium and large shrub massings should be intermingled at the mid and upper slopes areas. Plantings must respect neighboring views (see fig. 12.1 & 12.2 in Attachment IX). 5. Canopy trees shall be placed at the lower slope areas and shall not grow above the height of the top of slope at view conditions. Canopy trees shall be placed in random clusters adjacent to property lines to open view corridors. Vertical trees shall be located at the upper slope areas adjacent to property lines at view conditions (see fig. 12.3, 12.4 in Attachment IX). 6. Trees located on large slopes shall be grouped in clusters to maintain a natural appearance. C. Irrigation Design Standards 1. All manufactured slopes shall be installed with a permanent, automatic irrigation system. 2. UVR PVC, or "brownline ", may be installed only on master association or LMD slopes. However, all toe -of -slope conditions shall be buried and installed with pop -up heads. 3. Private slopes shall be installed with buried PVC pipe. 4. All slope irrigation shall be installed with an approved means of backflow prevention. 5. Separate circuits shall be installed for top, toe and mid slope conditions. 6. Spray heads shall be designed to avoid bench drains. Heads shall be installed on both sides to maintain coverage. 7. Spray heads shall be designed with respect to the topography. 8. A master valve with flow sensor is required at all point of connections. 9. Rain sensing override devices are required. 10. Worst case pressure loss calculations shall be included for the circuit with the highest volume, the circuit with the longest run from the POC and the circuit at the highest elevation. 11. An irrigation schedule shall be included within the irrigation controller box. 12. All necessary means shall be taken to prevent low head drainage. The plans must specify that any head that drains for more than sixty (60) seconds requires a check valve. SECTION 12 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS 12.1 Water - Efficient Model Home Requirements a. General: These requirements apply to all Residential Zones whenever model homes are involved. If there are two or more model homes, one shall be designed to meet the water - saving landscaping condition for residential tracts. 000143 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 28 Each "water- saving" model home shall contain exclusively low -water use plant materials and efficient irrigation systems with appropriate signs and information for prospective home buyers. b. Water Meter: Each model in the complex, including the low -water use model, shall be equipped with a water meter to generate records on how much water the landscape uses. The information will be used in public information materials about the model and the water - saving potential for low -water use landscapes. C. Plant Material: All plants used are to be low -water using types and readily available in Ventura County or other nearby sources. The plants used should be attractive, including some flowering types, require relatively little maintenance once established, and enhance the appearance of the model. d. Use of Lawn: When there are two models, the use of lawn in the water - efficient model shall not exceed twenty -five percent (25 %) of the net landscaped area with no limit on front yard use. When there are three or more models, the use of lawn shall be no more than total fifteen percent (15 %) of the net landscaped area of the water - efficient model. The net landscaped area is the gross area minus the house foot print, the driveway, detached garage, attached covered patio, slopes of 3:1 ratio or steeper and higher than four feet. Low -water use varieties of lawn shall be used. e. Irrigation System: The irrigation system serving a low -water use landscape shall include a bubbler and /or drip system valve. Any sprinklers shall be located properly to minimize overspray onto unplanted areas. At least one (1) moisture sensor should be used with a sign indicating its location. The moisture sensor will override the controller if the soil is too wet to require irrigation. f. Signs: Signs identifying aspects of the landscape design and irrigation shall be placed around the model. These signs should be clearly marked on the landscape plan for the model. The criteria below should be used in developing and placing the signs. 1. Entrance Sign: A maximum four (4) square foot sign shall be located in front of or at the entrance to the model home. The sign shall indicate that the model is landscaped with low -water using or drought tolerant plant materials and that an efficient irrigation system has been used. 2. Identification Signs: Small, maximum one (1) square foot, Identification signs shall be placed throughout the landscaped area identifying the irrigation system used, the different sub -areas of the landscape, and any other features that contribute to the overall water conservation theme (hardscapes, redwood bark, mulch). One (1) sign shall identify the moisture sensor in the display. 3. Interior Signs or Displays: A drawing or combination of drawings should be displayed inside the model providing a schematic of the landscape. These drawings should include a key identifying the plants in the yard. It is suggested that this schematic also be printed in a one (1) page handout to be available at the model or the sales office. The drawings could be simplified renderings of the landscape plan itself, using common 000150 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 29 names rather than the botanical names for the plants. The drawings should be colorful, easy to read, and framed for protection. g. Literature: A package of literature describing water conserving landscaping shall be given out to individuals upon purchase of a home in the tract. This literature and additional materials shall be displayed inside the model, also enclosed in a frame, with a note indicating where this material can be obtained. 12.2 Private Front Yards Residential landscapes are those which occur on private property outside the street right -of -way. These areas are installed and maintained by the homeowner or homeowner association. The following suggestions are provided to assist the homeowner or the association in establishing a well conceived and balanced landscape design with the emphasis on allowing the maximum amount of creativity as possible while still meeting the intent of these guidelines. a. Water Conservation: 1. Turf areas should be limited to one -third (1/3) of the total landscape area. The remaining area should include one -third (1/3) shrubs /groundcover and one -third (1/3) hardscape. 2. Irrigated areas should be separated between turf and shrub /groundcover areas. This allows for different watering schedules to meet the various water needs of different plant materials. 3. Automated irrigation controllers and remote control valves should be utilized to efficiently monitor watering schedules. This prevents accidental all night watering and also provides freedom to leave the landscape for prolonged periods of time without creating stress conditions. 4. Irrigation design should include properly sized sprinkler heads (spray radius) and provide head to head spacing of sprinklers to insure adequate coverage. 5. Water overspray should be kept to a minimum of one foot (1') to two feet (2') on hardscape surfaces and avoid spraying on walls and fences. 6. Bubbler and drip irrigation is encouraged for use in small landscape areas. 7. Turf varieties should be selected for durability and reduced water needs. Alta fescue and Bermuda hybrids (with perennial rye grass used as a "nurse crop" in winter) are encouraged. 8. Shrubs selected should be compatible with the climatic conditions of the inland valleys (hot and cold) and somewhat drought tolerant. b. Planting 1. Trees should be selected based on their size at maturity. 000151 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 30 2. A balance of evergreen and deciduous (leafless in winter) trees should be planted to provide a seasonally changed landscape. 3. Shrubs and groundcovers should be selected based on their eventual size to avoid an "overgrown" or butchered appearance. 4. Foreground and background relationships should be utilized in shrub and groundcover plantings. 5. Screening (planting of trees and /or shrubs of undesirable views is encouraged. 6. View opportunities should be maintained as a courtesy to adjacent property owners. C. Installation: All planting areas should be loosened to a depth of six inches (6 ") and rototilled in two (2) directions with soil amendments and conditioners as required by soil type. d. Maintenance 1. Landscape areas should be maintained in an attractive condition at all times. 2. Regular fertilization with a well - balanced fertilizer should be done to avoid stressed conditions and prevent disease. e. Safety 1. Water overspray on hardscape areas should be avoided and kept to a minimum. 2. Pop -up sprinkler heads on swing joints should be used along walkways to avoid a "trip hazard ". 12.3 Street Trees It is the goal of the City of Moorpark to create an overall cohesive theme in terms of street tree design and species selection. Street trees should be incorporated into the overall landscape theme of the development. The designer shall refer to the approved Street Tree List. The following guidelines serve to create a visible community character that will foster a unique image: Planting Design: Within all residential projects, minimum 24" box size street trees shall be planted as follows: a. Cul -de -sac: minimum one tree per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). b. Interior Lot: minimum one tree per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). C. Corner Lot: minimum three trees per street frontage (maximum thirty feet (30') on center). 0 00152 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 31 12.4 Streetscape Concept The Streetscape Concept is the primary landscape framework for the City of Moorpark. The intention is to establish the theme for each major street in the City. The streetscape components consist of sidewalks, street trees, landscape areas behind the sidewalk, and median islands where they occur. Larger specimen trees should be planted at highly - visible focal points, such as entry gates, major intersections and other landmarks. Median islands along arterials should be planted with the same palette as adjacent parkways. A different, but complementary palette should be used along collector streets within the project and another different, but complementary palette along residential streets. Each palette may differ from area to area, but they should reflect the theme which is established by the arterial and collector streets. The designer shall verify final tree selection with the Community Development Director. 12.5 Walls and Fencing The perimeter wall acts as a divider between residential and commercial areas from a street. The wall blocks noise and creates privacy. The treatment of wall can add special dimension to the streetscape concept. The design of walls should be consistent throughout neighborhoods of the City to create a community theme. The following are guidelines for walls which are located along streets, public space, the rear street of double frontage lots, and the side street yard of double frontage lots: a. Wall niches are prohibited. A minimum five -foot (5') planter area shall be provided for trees, shrubs and vines adjacent to all walls. b. Chain link, plastic and wood fencing is not permitted, except in rural areas, subject to Community Development Director approval. C. The minimum wall setback shall be determined by the Conditions of Approval for the project. Walls shall vary in setback to provide areas for landscape features that create interest and reduce the linear aspect of appearance of a walled street. d. Use of decorative masonry block, pilaster, wrought iron and other decorative treatments are required. e. Precision concrete is not permitted for walls adjacent to a street. f. The texture and color of walls shall match the theme of the development or adjacent surroundings. g. In residential areas the wall height shall be a minimum of six feet (6') when located in a street sideyard. Wall heights in excess of six feet (6') shall require adjacent landscaping on the street side to soften the overall height. h. Walls over six feet (6') high and retaining walls over three feet (3') high require certification by a Registered Engineer. i. The use of vines, shrubs, and trees shall be required to break the monotonous pattern of the wall. Landscaping shall be approved by the Community Development Director. 000153 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 32 ATTACHMENT I LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (GENERAL REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: 1. ENGINEER'S PRECISE OR ROUGH GRADING PLAN MUST BE INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL. 2. PLANS ARE PREPARED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SEAL IS ON ALL SHEETS. (ALL SHEETS MUST BE WET SIGNED FOR FINAL APPROVAL) 3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S COMPANY NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER ON ALL SHEETS. 4. OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER ON ALL SHEETS. 5. SHEET INDEX ON TITLE SHEET. 6. ALL SHEETS CLEARLY LABELED. 7. VICINITY MAP AND LOCATION MAP WITH PROJECT SITE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 8. NORTH ARROW AND SCALE ON ALL APPLICABLE SHEETS. 9. 'LANDSCAPE INSPECTION SCHEDULE' ON TITLE SHEET (SEE ATTACHED) 10. SIGNATURE BLOCK ON TITLE SHEET (SEE ATTACHED) 11. ALL PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, PUBLIC R.O.W., SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 12. ALL SLOPES, INCLUDE TOP AND TOE, ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 13. ALL SITE UTILITIES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. 14. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. NOTATION IS INCLUDED IDENTIFYING WHICH STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND WHICH WILL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 15. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS ARE CLEARLY LABELED. NOTATION IS INCLUDED IDENTIFYING WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AND WHICH WILL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. COMMENTS: OCC154 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 33 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (SLOPE PLANTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMITIENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: A HORTICULTURAL SOILS ANALYSIS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IS ATTACHED TO THE PLANS. THE SOILS ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED BY A LABORATORY OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. SOIL SAMPLE IS TAKEN AFTER SITE GRADING AND DATE IS INCLUDED ON THE REPORT. 2. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3' VERTICAL HEIGHT ARE PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER FROM CUTTINGS, SHRUBS AND TREES. HYDROMULCH IS USED IN AREAS ONLY WITH PRIOR CITY APPROVAL. 3. ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5' VERTICAL HEIGHT ARE INSTALLED WITH JUTE MESH OR EQUAL. 4. SHRUBS ON SLOPES ARE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM OF 1 SHRUB PER 100 SQUARE FEET. 5. ALL SLOPES ADJACENT TO MAJOR ROADS, 'ENTRY' TO PROJECTS SITES AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS ARE 'ENHANCED' WITH SHRUBS AND TREES THAT EXCEED THE MINIMUM QUANTITY AND SIZE REQUIREMENT. 6. TREES ON SLOPES ARE PLANTED AT A MINIMUM OF 1 TREE PER 350 SQUARE FEET. 7. A CALCULATION IS PROVIDED SHOWING TOTAL SLOPE LANDSCAPE AREA, TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES WITH TREE SIZES AND TOTAL NUMBER OF SHRUBS WITH SHRUB SIZES. 8. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR CLIMATIC CONDITIONS. 9. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR SLOPE AREAS. 10. PLANT MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY APPROVED PLANT LIST. 11. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ON SLOPES IS 15 GALLON. 12. MINIMUM SHRUB SIZES ON SLOPES IS (60 %) 5 GAL., (40 %) 1 GAL. 13. PLANS MUST CALL FOR A NINETY (90) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO BE PAID FOR BY OWNER. 14. PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY PLANT LOCATIONS. 000155 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 34 15. PLANT QUANTITY AND SIZES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS AND IN LEGEND. 16. PLANTING LEGEND IDENTIFIES BOTANICAL AND COMMON NAME. 17. GROUNDCOVER SPACING IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 18. HYDROSEED MIX IS INCLUDED IF APPLICABLE. MIX IDENTIFIES SEED TYPE AND LBS. /ACRE. 19. PLANTING DETAILS ARE CONSISTENT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 20. PLANTING NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED. 21. NOTATION IS INCLUDED THAT TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF SIDEWALK, CURB OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS MUST HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED. ROOTBARRIER MUST EXTEND 5 FEET IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE AND BE A MINIMUM OF 24" DEPTH. COMMENTS: OOHJSG Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 35 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (PLANTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: A HORTICULTURAL SOILS ANALYSIS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IS ATTACHED TO THE PLANS. THE SOILS ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED BY A LABORATORY OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. SOIL SAMPLE IS TAKEN AFTER SITE GRADING AND DATE IS INCLUDED ON THE REPORT. 2. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING OR CAMOUFLAGING. 3. ALL MAINTENANCE STAGING AREAS AND UTILITARIAN STRUCTURES SUCH AS TRASH ENCLOSURES AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS ARE SHOWN WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING. 4. PLANT MATERIAL IS SUITABLE FOR CLIMATIC CONDITIONS. 5. PLANT MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH CITY APPROVED PLANT LIST. 6. MINIMUM SHRUB SIZES ARE MET. 7. ALL PLANTING AREAS ADJACENT TO MAJOR ROADS, 'ENTRY' TO PROJECTS SITES AND OTHER HIGHLY VISIBLE AREAS ARE 'ENHANCED' WITH SHRUBS AND TREES THAT EXCEED THE MINIMUM QUANTITY AND SIZE REQUIREMENT. 8. PLANS MUST CALL FOR A NINETY (90) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO BE PAID FOR BY OWNER. 9. PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY PLANT LOCATIONS. 10. PLANT QUANTITIES AND SIZES ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS AND IN LEGEND. 11. PLANTING LEGEND IDENTIFIES BOTANICAL AND COMMON NAME. 12. GROUNDCOVER SPACING IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 13. PLANTING DETAILS ARE CONSISTANT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 14. PLANTING NOTES /SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED. 15. NOTATION IS INCLUDED THAT ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF SIDEWALK, CURB OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS MUST HAVE A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER INSTALLED. ROOT BARRIER MUST EXTEND 5 FEET IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE AND BE A MINIMUM OF 24" DEPTH. 0"115 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 36 16. ALL STREET TREES ARE PLANTED MINIMUM 5' FROM WALKS OR OTHER HARDSCAPE AREAS. 17. ALL STREET TREES ARE PLANTED MINIMUM 10' FROM UTILITY POLES AND LIGHT STANDARDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, SEWERLINES AND UTILITY STRUCTURES. 18. ALL LOTS HAVE MINIMUM (1) ONE STREET TREE AND MINIMUM (1) SECONDARY TREE PER LOT. 19. ALL CORNER LOTS HAVE MINIMUM (3) THREE STREET TREES PER LOT. TREE SPACING DOES NOT EXCEED 30' ON CENTER. 20. ALL STREET TREES ARE MINIMUM 24" BOX SIZE. ALL SECONDARY TREES ARE MINIMUM 15- GALLON SIZE. 21. MINIMUM TREE QUANTITIES FOR MULTI- FAMILY OR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS IS ONE TREE PER -500 S.F. 22. TREE SIZES FOR MULTI - FAMILY OR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS IS 75% 24" BOX AND 25% 15- GALLON. 23. STREET TREE SPACING DOES NOT EXCEED 30' ON CENTER. 24. PARKING AREAS HAVE MINIMUM 50% SHADE COVERAGE AT 2/3 TREE MATURITY OR 15 -YEARS GROWTH OR ONE (1) TREE PER EVERY 4 STALLS IN A ROW. 25. PARKING AREA TREES ARE MINIMUM 24" BOX SIZE. 26. PARKING AREAS HAVE PLANTER 'FINGERS' AND /OR ISLANDS AT THE TERMINUS OF ALL PARKING ROWS AND MINIMUM EVERY 100 LINEAL FEET AND EVERY 12 STALLS ADJACENT TO BUILDING FRONTAGES AND STREETS. 27. PARKS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 55 TREES PER GROSS ACRE. HOWEVER, THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT MAY BE REDUCED IF THE PARK HAS 'ACTIVE' RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. 28. PARK TREES ARE MINIMUM 40% 24" BOX AND 60% 15- GALLON. 29. A CALCULATION IS PROVIDED SHOWING TOTAL PROJECT AREA, TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA, TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES WITH TREE SIZES AND TOTAL NUMBER OF SHRUBS WITH SHRUB SIZES. COMMENTS: 00CASS Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 37 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (IRRIGATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS) APPLICANT'S NAME: PROJECT NAME: PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): DATE: THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS AUTOMATIC. 2. THE WORST CASE PRESSURE LOSS IS CALCULATED AND SHOWN FOR THE VALVE WITH THE MOST VOLUME, THE VALVE FARTHEST FROM THE WATER METER AND THE VALVE AT THE HIGHEST ELEVATION. 3. THE WATER USE CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IS PROVIDED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IS DESIGNED SO THAT THE OPERATING WINDOW IS NOT WITHIN 8 HOURS OF PEAK DEMAND PERIODS. 5. NOTATION IS INCLUDED STATING THAT THE BACKFLOW DEVICE MUST BE TESTED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A YEAR. 6. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN IN SHRUB AREAS WITH ADEQUATE PLANT SCREENING. 7. THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF ALL WATER METERS ARE SHOWN. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WATER METER AND HOOK -UP. 8. THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE FOR ALL CONTROLLERS IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ELECTRIC METER INSTALLATION. 9. THE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENT FOR ALL BOOSTER PUMPS IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PLANS REFERENCE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ELECTRIC METER INSTALLATION. 10. SPRAY HEADS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE. 11. ALL VALVES ARE DESIGNED WITH MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES. 12. THE SYMBOL, MANUFACTURER, MODEL #, AND SIZE OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT ARE CLEARLY LABELED IN THE LEGEND. 13. THE LOCATION OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN. 14. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND WITH A POWDER COATED MESH ENCLOSURE WITH ROUNDED CORNERS. THE MODEL # AND SIZE OF THE ENCLOSURE IS CLEARLY LABELED. 000159 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 38 15. THE MASTER VALVE AND FLOW METER (IF APPLICABLE) ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE LEGEND WITH MODEL # AND SIZE CLEARLY LABELED. 16. SPRAY HEADS ARE LISTED IN THE LEGEND WITH SYMBOL, MANUFACTURER, MODEL #, RADIUS, FLOW, PRESSURE AND PRECIPITATION RATE. 17. ROTOR HEADS ARE LISTED IN THE LEGEND WITH NOZZLES GROUPED FOR MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATES. 18. DETAILS ARE CONSISTENT WITH CITY STANDARDS. 19. IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED. 20. THE CLASS AND /OR SCHEDULE FOR MAINLINE, LATERAL LINE, AND IRRIGATION SLEEVES IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND. 21. THE SIZE OF THE MAINLINE, LATERAL LINE AND IRRIGATION SLEEVES IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 22. VALVE CALLOUTS IDENTIFY THE STATION AND CONTROLLER #, VALVE SIZE AND MAXIMUM GPM. 23. OPERATING PRESSURE IS WITHIN MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 24. FLOW VELOCITIES DO NOT EXCEED 5' PER SECOND. 25. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS MATCHED PER INDIVIDUAL HYDROZONE. 26. TOP AND BOTTOM OF SLOPES MUST BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY. 27. EQUIPMENT USED IS WITHIN MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 28. ALL PIPES AND WIRES UNDER PAVING MUST BE SLEEVED. SLEEVES MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE FOR NUMBER OF WIRES AND SIZE OF PIPE (MINIMUM 2x'S DIAMETER OF PIPE ENCLOSED). 29. POP -UP HEADS ARE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE OVERSPRAY. 30. RISER HEADS ARE NOT INSTALLED WHERE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC VIEW. 31. HEAD RADIUS MUST NOT BE REDUCED MORE THAN 15% OF NOZZLE SIZE TO MINIMIZE OVERSPRAY. COMMENTS: 000160 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 39 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (CITY MAINTAINED AND MASTER ASSOCIATION AREAS) SCHEDULE: THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EACH OF THE REQUIRED INSPECTION: 1. PRESSURE TEST OF IRRIGATION MAINLINE. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TRENCHES. 2. IRRIGATION COVERAGE TESTS. COVERAGE TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING. 3. AFTER TREES AND SHRUBS ARE SPOTTED, BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. UPON COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE MAY BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME. 5. FINAL INSPECTION: AT THE START OF THE ONE -YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 6. FINAL ACCEPTANCE: AT THE END OF THE ONE -YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD OR AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT. ©010161 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 40 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST LANDSCAPE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (SUB- ASSOCIATION, COMMERCIAL AND ON -SITE AREAS) SCHEDULE: THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL INSPECT CONSTRUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EACH OF THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: IRRIGATION COVERAGE TESTS. COVERAGE TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING. 2. UPON COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. FINAL ACCEPTANCE MAY BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME. ®0G162 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 41 LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST CITY APPROVAL BLOCK (Must be included on Title Sheet) APPROVED CITY OF MOORPARK These plans have been reviewed and found to be in compliance with relevant sections of the Moorpark Municipal Code and the Conditions of Approval for (Permit Case No.) and (Permit Case No.). Landscaping and Irrigation shall be installed on the subject property substantially as shown herein. Approved by: Community Development Director 060163 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 42 ATTACHMENT II GENERAL RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST The City reserves the right to approve or reject any of the plant species listed at any time. Note that several plant species listed are included on the prohibited list. These plants are only intended to be installed in urban areas away from native hillsides or natural areas. Prior City approval is required. Trees Acacia spp. ncn Acacia baileyana Bailey Acacia Agonis flexuosa Myrtle Albizia julibrissin _Peppermint Silk Tree Anus rhombifolia White Alder Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree Brachichiton acerifolius Flame Tree Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree Callistemon citrinus Lemon Bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottlebrush Cassia leptophylla Gold Medallion Tree Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Chitalpa x tashkensis Chitalpa Cinnamomum Camphora Camphor Tree Cupaniopsis Anacardiodes Carrotwood Cuppressocyparis leylandi Leyland Cypress Eriobotrya japonica Loquat Eriobotrya def/exa Bronze Loquat Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red Gum Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon - scented Gum Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver Dollar Gum Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Iron Bark Fraxinus ornus ' Raywood' Raywood Ash Fraxinus veluntina `Modesto' Modesto Ash Fraxinus veluntina `Rio Grande' Rio Grande Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Ginko biloba (Male only) Maidenhair Tree (grafted male) Gleditsia triacanthos spp. Honey Locust Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Juglans hindsii Northern California Black Walnut Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Ligustrum japonicum Japanese Privet Liquidambar styraciflua (cultivars) Sweet Gum Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Lyonathamnus floribundus var. asplenifolius Island (Catalina) Ironwood ©GCJL64 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 43 Magnolia grandiflora var. Southern Magnolia Maytenus boaria `Green Showers' Showers Mayten Tree Me/a/euca linarifolia Flaxleaf Paperbark Melaleuca styphelioides Black Tea Tree Mela/ueca quinquenervia Cajeput Tree Metrosideros exce/sus New Zealand Christmas Tree Nerium oleander (standard) Oleander O /ea europaea (fruitless) Olive Photinia sen-u/ata Chinese Photinia Pinus spp. Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Pittosporum rhombifolium Queensland Pittosporum P/atanus acerifolia ` B/oodgood' Bloodgood Plane Tree P/atanus- acerifolia ` Yarwood' Yarwood Plane Tree P/atanus racemosa California Sycamore Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine Populus fremonth Western Cottonwood Prunus cerasifera Atropurpurea' Purple Leaf Plum Prunus cerasifera `Krauter Vesuvius' Black -leaf Plum Prunus /yonii Catalina Cherry Pyrus calleyana `Aristocrat' Aristocrat Pear Pyrus calleryana `Bradford' Bradford Pear Pyrus calleyana `Capitol' Capitol Pear Pyrus calleyana `Red Spire' Red Spire Pear Pyrus calleyana 'Chanticleer' Chanticleer Pear Pyrus kawakamii Evergreen Pear Quercus spp. Oak Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus engelmanii Mesa Oak Quecus ilex Holly Oak Quercus lobata Valley Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Quecus virginiana Southern Live Oak Rhaphiolepis `Majestic Beauty' Rhaphiolepis Tree Rhus /ancea African Sumac Robinia (tree form) Locust Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow Tree Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree Tabebuia chrysotricha Gold Trumpet Tree Tabebuia impetiginosa Pink Trumpet Tree Tristania conferta Brisbane Box U/mus parvifolia Evergreen Elm 00 1GS Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 44 Shrubs Abelia grandif/ora Agave spp. Arbutus unedo 'Compacta' Arctostaphylos densiflora Artemisia spp. Atriplex spp. Calliandra inaequilatera Callistemon spp. Callistemon citrinus Cassia artemisiodes Ceanothus spp. Cistus spp. Cistus purpureus Cuphea hyssopifolia Dodonaea viscosa'Purpurea' Echium Fastuosum Elaeagnus spp. Eriogonum crocatum Escallonia spp. Feijoa sellowiana Fremontodendron spp. Fremontodendron `California Glory' Grevillea noelii Heteromeles arbutifolia Kniphofia uvaria Leucophyllum frutescens 'Compacta' Ligustrum lucidium Mahonia 'Golden Abundance' Mahonia nevinii Myrtus communis Nerium oleander Pittosporum spp. Photinia fraseri Prunus caroliniana Prunus ilicifolia Prunus lyonnii Punica granatum Rhapheolepis indica Rhamnus alaternus Rhamnus california 'Eve Case' Rhamnus crocea ilicifolia Rhus integrifolia Rhus ovata Romneya coulteri Salvia spp. Senecio cineraria Sollya heterophylla Tagetes lemmond Abelia Agave Dwarf Strawberry Tree Manzanita Wormwood Saltbush Pink Powder Puff Bottlebrush Lemon Bottlebrush Feathery Cassia California Lilac Rockrose Orchid Rockrose False Heather Purple Hopseed Bush Pride of Madiera Elaegnus Conejo Buckwheat Escallonia Pineapple Guava Flannel Bush 'California Glory' Fremontia Noel's Grevillea Toyon Red Hot Poker Texas Ranger Glossy Privet 'Golden Abundance' Oregon Grape Nevin's Barberry Myrtle Oleander Mock Orange (some species) Photinia Carolina Cherry Hollyleaf Cherry Catalina Cherry Pomegranate India Hawthorne Italian Buckthorn 'Eve Case' Coffeeberry Hollyleaf Coffeeberry Lemonade Berry Sugar Bush Matilija Poppy Sage Dusty Miller Australian Bluebells Mexican Bush Marigold 000166 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 45 Tamarix pentandra, T. parviflora Salt Cedar Tamarisks Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Westringia rosmariniformis Westringia Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma Yucca spp. Yucca Umbrellularia californica California Laurel Ground and Slope Cover Acacia redolens prostrate Prostrate Acacia Achillea spp. Yarrow Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanita Arctotheca calendula Yellow capeweed Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush Baccharis pilularis Dwarf Coyote Brush Baccharis 'Twin Peaks' or 'Pigeon Point' Coyote Brush Bougainvillea spp. Bougainvillea Ceanothus spp. California Lilac Cerastium tomentosum Snow in Summer Cistus spp. Rockrose Convolvulus cneorem Bush Morning Glory Coreopsis aruiculata 'Nana' Dwarf Coreopsis Cotoneaster spp. Cotoneaster Euonymus fortunei radicans Common Winter Creeper Gazania hybrids Gazania hybrids Grevillea 'Noelli' Noel Grevillea Hypericum calycinum Creeping St. John's Wort Ice Plant varieties Ice Plant Iris douglasiana Pacific Coast Iris Lantana montevidensis and hybrids Lavender Lantana and hybrids Limonium pectinatum Petite Sea Lavender Lonicera japonica halliana Hall's Honeysuckle Myoporum pacificum Prostrate Myoporum Myoporum parvifolium Prostrate Myoporum Optunia spp. Prickly Pear Osteopermum fructicosum Trailing African Daisy Pyracantha spp. Firethorn Ribes viburnifolium Catalina Perfume Rosa banksiae Lady Bank's Rose Rosmarinus officinalis ' Prostrata' Dwarf Rosemary Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Teucrium chamaedrys 'Prostratum' Prostrate Germander Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine Vinca spp. Periwinkle 00016: Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 46 Flowering Plants, Perennials and Accent Plants Achillea spp. Yarrow Agave spp. Century Plant Aloe arborescens Tree Aloe Aloe nobilis Dwarf Aloe Aloe spp. Aloe Asparagus sprengeri Asparagus Fern Asparagus myeri Myer's Asparagus Centranthus ruber Red Valerian Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Cistus spp. Rockrose Convolvulus cneorum Bush Morning Glory Coreopsis auriculata Golden Coreopsis Coreposis verticillata Thread - leafed Coreopsis Cotinus coggygria Smoke Tree Dietes spp. Fortnight Lily Echium fastuosum Pride of Madeira Eriogonum spp. Buckwheat Escallonia spp. Escallonia Fremontodendron spp. Flannel Bush Helianthes tuberosus Jerusalem Artichoke Hemerocallis hybrids Daylily Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker Lantana spp. Lantana Lavandula spp. Lavender Limonium perezii Sea Lavender Nerium oleander Oleander Oenothera speciosa childsii Mexican Evening Primrose Pennisetum setaceum Fountain Grass Penstemon hybrids California Penstemon Plumbago auriculata Cape Plumbago Portulaca grandiflora Rose Moss Romneya cou/teri Matilija Poppy Rosa spp. Rose Senecio cineraria Dusty Miller Spartium spp. Broom Teucrium fruiticans Bush Germander Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic Vitis spp. Grape Yucca gloriosa Soft -tip Yucca Yucca recurvifolia Curveleaf Yucca Vines Bougainvillea cultivars Bougainvillea cultivars Campsis spp. Trumpet Creeper Clytostoma callistegiodes Violet Trumpet Vine Distictis buccinatorius Scarlet Trumpet Vine Hardenbergia comptoniana Lilac Vine � Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 47 Hibbertia scandens Jasminum spp. Macfadyena unguis -cati Parthenocissus tricuspidata Rosa spp. Solandra maxima Solanum jasminoides Tecomaria capensis Vitis vinifera Wisteria spp. Guinea Gold Vine Jasmine Cats Claw Boston Ivy Climbing Rose Cup of Gold Vine Potato Vine Cape Honeysuckle Wine Grape Wisteria 000169 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 48 ATTACHMENT III INVASIVE AND PROHIBITED PLANT LIST The following undesirable plant species are not to be used near or adjacent to native vegetation or around drainage courses that terminate at natural areas. It should be noted that several of the plant species listed may be considered for use in an urban environment where the risk of escape is clearly negligible only with prior approval from city's landscape architect. Botanical Name Common Name Acacia spp. Acacia Acacia cyclops _ Acacia Acacia longifolia Sydney golden or golden wattle Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood acacia Ageratina adenophora Sticky eupatory Agrostis stolonifera Creeping bentgrass Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven Ammophila arenaria European beachgrass Andropogon virginicus Broomsedge bluestem Anthriscus caeca /is Bur chervil Aponogeton distachyon Cape pondweed Aptenia cordifolia Baby sun rose Arundo donax Giant reed Atriplex sembiccata Australian saltbush Avena barbata Slender wild oat Avena fatua Wild oat Berula erecta Cutleaf water parsnip Brassica nigra Black mustard Brassica rapa Field mustard, Turnip Brassica tourneforth Moroccan mustard Bromus diandrus Ripgut grass Bromus hordeaceus Soft chess Bromus madritensis Foxtail chess Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass Carderia chalapense Lens -pod Carderia draba Hoary cress Carderia pubescens White -top Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle Carpobrotus edulis Hottentot -fig Catharanthus roseus Madagascar periwinkle Centaurea melitensis Tocalote Centaurea solstitialis Yellow star - thistle Ceratophyllum demersum Aquatic hornwort Chenopodium album Lamb's quarters, Pigweed Chenopodium murale Nettle- leaved goosefoot Chrysanthemum coronarium Garland or crown daisy Cirsium arvense Canada thistle Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle 00C'1. i 0 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 49 Conicosia pugioniformis Conium maculatum Cortaderia jubata Cortaderia selloana Cotoneaster lacteus Cotoneaster pannosus Cotula coronopifolia Cynara cardunculus Cynodon dactylon Cytisus scoparius Cytisus striatus Datisca glomerata Delairia odorata (= Senecio milkanioides) Descurainia sophia - Egeria densa Ehrharta calycina Eichhornia crassipes Elaeagnus augustifolia Elodea canadensis Erodium cicutarium Eucalyptus globulus Euphorbia esula Ficus carica Foeniculum vulgare Genista monspessulana (= Cytisus monspessulanus) Gunnera tinctoria Hedera helix Hedera canariensis Hippurus vulgaris Hirschfeldia incana Hordeum jubatum Hydrilla verticillata Lactuca serriola Lepidium latifolium Lobularia maritima Lupinus arboreus Lythrum spp. Lythrum hyssopifolium Lythrum salicaria Malva parviflora Marrubium vulgare Melilotus alba Mentha pulegium Mesembryanthemum crystallinum Myoporum laetum Myriophyllum aquaticum Myriophyllum spicatum Nerium oleander Nicotiana glauca Narrow - leaved ice plant Poison hemlock Andean pampas grass, jubatagrass Pampas grass Cotoneaster Cotoneaster Brass buttons Artichoke thistle, Cardoon Bermuda grass Scotch broom Portuguese broom Durango root Cape ivy (German ivy) Tansy mustard Brazilian waterweed Veldt grass Water hyacinth Russian olive Common waterweed Red - stemmed filaree Blue gum Leafy spurge Edible fig Fennel French broom Gunnera English ivy Algerian ivy Mare's tail Shortpod mustard Foxtail barley Hydrilla Prickly lettuce Perennial pepperweed Sweet alyssum Bush lupine Loosestrife Loosestrife Purple loosestrife Cheeseweed, Little mallow Horehound White sweetclover Pennyroyal Crystalline iceplant Myoporum Parrot's feather Eurasian milfoil Oleander Tree tobacco 00011 1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 50 Ottelia alismoides Ottelia Oxalis pes- caprae Bermuda buttercup Parentucellia viscosa Parentucellia Pennisetum clandestinum Kikuyu grass Pennisetum setaceum Fountain grass Phalaris aquatica Harding grass Phoenix dactylifera Date palm Phragmites australis (= communis) Common reed Phyla (= Lippia) nodiflora Lippia Picris echioides Bristly ox- tongue Piptatherum miliaceum Smilo grass Pistia stratiotes Water lettuce Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass Raphanus sativus Radish Ranunculus aquatilis var. aquatilis Water buttercup Ranunculus muricatus Buttercup Rhus lancea African Sumac Ricinus communis Castor bean Robinia pseudocacia Black locust Rorippa nasturtium - aquaticum Watercress Rubus procerus (= discolor) Himalayan blackberry Rumex conglomeratus Whorled dock Rumex crispus Curly dock Salix a /ba White willow Sa Isola spp. Tumbleweed SaIsola soda Tumbleweed SaIsola tragus Russian thistle, Tumbleweed Schinus molle Peruvian pepper tree Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper tree Scirpus spp. Bulrush, alkali bulrush Senecio mikanioides German -ivy Silybum marianum Milk thistle Sisymbrium irio London rocket Sisymbrium officinale Hedge mustard Sisymbrium orientale Oriental mustard Sonchus oleraceus Common sow thistle Sorghum halepense Johnsongrass Spartina a/terniflora European /Atlantic cord grass Spartina densiflora Cord grass Spartina patens Cord grass Spartium junceum Spanish broom Taeniatherum caput - medusae Medusa -head Tamarix aphylla Athel Tamarix ramosissima, T. chinensis, Salt cedar, tamarisk T. gallica, T. parviflora Taraxacum officinale Common dandelion Tribulus ten'estris Puncture vine Tropaeolum majus Garden nasurtium Ulex eruopaeus Gorse Varbascum spp. Mullein 00011 -12 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 51 Veronica ssp. (incl. V. Anagallis- aquatica, V. beccabunga, V. catenata) Vinca major Washingtonia filifera Xanthium spinosum Xanthium strumarium Zantedeschia aethiopica Speedwell, Brooklime Greater periwinkle Fan palm Spiny cocklebur Cocklebur Calla lily ' Sources include: California Native Plant Society. 1992. Non - native invasive plants in the Santa Monica Mountains; Dudley, T. 1998. Exotic plant invasions in California riparian areas and wetlands. Fremontia 26(4): 24 -29; California Exotic Pest Plant Council. 1996. List of exotic pest plants of greatest ecological concern in California. ouel'l3 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 52 ATTACHMENT IV RECOMMENDED TREES FOR STREETS The City reserves the right to approve or reject any of the plant species listed at any time. Note that several plant species listed are included on the prohibited list. These plants are only intended to be installed in urban areas away from native hillsides or natural areas. Prior City approval is required. Trees Agonis f/exuosa Peppermint Myrtle Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree Callistemon citrinus Lemon Bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottlebrush Cassia excelsa Crown of Gold Tree Cassia leptophylla Gold Medallion Tree Chitalpa x tashkentensis Chitalpa Cinnamomum Camphora Camphor Tree Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Fraxinus ornus ` Raywood' Raywood Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Ginko biloba (Male only) Maidenhair Tree (grafted male) Gleditsia triacanthos `var.' Honey Locust Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Magnolia grandif/ora var. Southern Magnolia Maytenus boaria `Green Showers' Showers Mayten Tree Melaleuca linarifolia Flaxleaf Paperbark Melalueca quinquenervia Cajeput Tree Photinia serrulata Chinese Photinia Pinus eldarica Mondell Pine Pinus halepensis Aleppo Pine Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Pittosporum phillyraeoides Willow Pittosporum Platanus acerifolia `Bloodgood' London Plane Platanus acerifolia ` Yarwood' Yarwood Plane Tree Podocarpus glacilior Fern Pine Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine Prunus cerasifera Atropurpurea' Purple Leaf Plum Prunus c. `Krauter Vesuvius' Black -leaf Plum Prunus serrulata Amanogawa' Columnar Flowering Cherry Pyrus calleryana `Aristocrat' Aristocrat Pear 0001'14 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 53 Pyrus calleryana `Bradford' Pyrus calleryana `Chanticleer' Pyrus kawakamii Quercus agrifolia Quecus ilex Rhuslancea Robinia (tree form) Sapium sebiferum Sophora japonica Tristania conferta Ulmus parvifolia Bradford Pear Chanticleer Pear Evergreen Pear Coast Live Oak Holly Oak African Sumac Locust Chinese Tallow Tree Japanese Pagoda Tree Brisbane Box Evergreen Elm 0001:5 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 54 ATTACHMENT V REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT /ENTITLEMENT NUMBER(S): I, the undersigned Applicant, hereby authorize the City of Moorpark, California to review the Landscape Plans submitted for the above referenced permit/entitlement request(s) in accordance with the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code. I am herewith depositing in accordance with adopted fee schedule to cover consultant review (plus 15% city administrative charge), staff review, coordination and processing, the unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to me. I further understand that, if the final cost is more than the deposit fee, I shall pay the balance due. Name of Applicant": Please print or type Phone:( ) Address of Applicant (Do not use P.O. Box) Phone: ( ) Name of Corporation or Agency Address of Corporation or Agency (Do not use P.O. Box) Signature Date `If corporation or agency, list person(s) authorized to act on behalf of corporation or agency. 0001:6 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 55 ATTACHMENT VI APPLICANT'S LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT'S CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Project Number Assessor's Parcel No.: Landscape Contractor: Landscape Architect: Applicant: I certify that: Post - Installation Inspection: (check to indicate compliance) ❑ A. Plants installed as specified including proper staking & root control boxes ❑ B. Soils amended as noted in soils report (Invoices attached) ❑ C. Irrigation system installed as designed an adjusted ❑ D. Reduced as -built plans in controllers ❑ E. As -built plans provided to owner /manager ❑ F. Backflow Prevention Test I certify that this project complies with the City of Moorpark Landscape Design Standards and guidelines. The landscape planting and irrigation installation conform to the approved plans and specifications with the following exceptions: (Itemize all exceptions on attached sheets) Signature, Applicant's Landscape State License Number Architect of Record CITY OF MOORPARK Landscape Consultant Verification Date I certify that this project: ❑ Complies, ❑ Does not comply, with the approved Landscape Plans with the following exceptions: (Use attached sheets, if necessary) Signature, City's Consultant State License Number Date 00() 1:'7 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 56 o o G Iii i;ii ALL (I ) PM": WVATWM PF'E F 27 MME• AV (2) FOR U" WK 6R LAR6M Tim KEY 1 r- Mrl6RADE 2 ROOMA -L AE;KraP" ak Eq funrr rA 5 (ray 1/1 M ROOr HALL -4 PM k PER U - /'W 9 �o a tit AV 15M *V OREAMR) -4 TrWOR,ARY a WAT1'RJ46 WIN 5 NATRIE WL b PKAFL L MIX (PER SOILS ANALY'515) 7 TREE TIES Tv P0.E 5 44 w 7 IW v. t f1.IRL` T ® M-,V TIG ICE OLKD N rWF M= Ty�5 IER .I tt*DSt.,APE SLFrAGE A" PCPJ%RATEP PIPE MIRJWFEP IN FLTEf2 PA M6 I ' /a" 6RAVEL 1 PVC- GAP NOM- - 5TJt-E$ 5t1fi.L NOr ftF4t PVAA 'V.1. MV -*VU exre w IWO UvtGrUzPw SOL - R,86E PRE-#MNJ TIES A664W b FO ,%WIU. RFLaA,AE1WATM5 - OrY *"ZN P ROOF DARRERS 5FW.1. V- MTA.LV ON &L rRPL`°S VVJTHW V-e ALJ. WA A6. P IVEWAW. WALLrP MV Ormg tja(,A *66 *v 9TKGTtRES TRBG PLANTING DE' A%. { °—)A -E 1 - 1 J City of Moorpark 000178 Tree Planting Detail Plate 1 -1 Planning Division g Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 57 i s t, f yj •E, 6, rrosm ate 1 AXTpAtL 0 2oVV peirrt reTrt nv -3 EqYLLY fPWP JW s ARAM t�!M WA01R5: WXV- Ft" yT*Z- -. rypv,& TREE rE: ArrAC4! Tj9 MNM DRAN(I 5 PLY. �DVV%Wo Y At- ?V TWES BADS ON D7 AW414*2 Tif LAWscm -z ARC i ' r VZs CR%t,5 rre RXrtr TO MW T >f FK4 VFZ4510N fM&ARPr4b WY?*, �- �U�4tNIf5 City of Moorpark 0301`79 p Tree Guying Detail Plate 1 -2 a Planning Division I- I Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 58 o 0 0 o O 4 -Ilk 4 •d or RGVrML KfY Z RA9i`ml ACAPOW OR E4 RA1T TAK (rte I FtR 74+/ PO. 0 FW� j*b" WX RV Ei�LATERj 5 mrrvt WL � DlV'.lit'1.L 4X AhtA Y5t5 5) rMT- TV-9 IAN 4 �R � { G LIRE TO �'A E kY'jtWq't,AL `-) PI- ' M Trz w A tax Tw � 9� tA-Ttc MEE 6LWtP IN W LJ Ngm. - STMIE �rwl trot f'ERG R1JhG'TOA1. *0 'S� EXrETO 41TJ U4*6TUZZcP 60L A666WN& r49 m" REZ- 04kMAI tONs_ - CATY AFB RMT WPMRS 6tA.L M te5TKlZP ON A L TFtES Whh W-,o' At1 WAYS, DRMEKAYS. WALLS AW ORCR nAR.JraGAPE AREAS ANP Srt44'URtS 'FREE P, ANTINCS ON 3LG*E �L��t:. (P-A"E ' -3) F it of Moor ark Of�0180 y p Tree Plantin on Slo a Detail Plate 1 -3 lanning Division 9 p Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 59 0 o 9A V o ° 00 P 4 _ a.DO Ot o U .ti• o ,O o 4 }� - -�� I. 2 r KEY fi!` RL101' [511! ' E1 r � i reit:itr COVE ( ;) j° WArc -RxiE, PA NN z KOMDA -L (TO to aeAO PRIOR TO ENO Or M&N-j MgKt) (VGP 1/2 pr Rxr MI) Q NAME WL ;i peke E-�. 2 PER - v. , (i� cw.+u'LL Ma t 4 f'F-4 fi- firti., i PER Quit COWAIPCRI Lg RE�fJRT R�.LAd�T,G� ►:T1si Q 2-/. Ctff Rwr WRER MATM E -(l r1OM MA9P!'GAVE SkFPA(-E �NRJB PLA`71�6 I? °'ri+IL (P;.�4'C 1 -4j City of Moorpark 00CI81 Planning Division Shrub Planting Detail Plate 1-4 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 60 0 - - Q G) 0 6 • --- - #V 0 oo, P- o 'N' 0 I jil x PEM Cr f;L,*T ML 0 E,0� Q-0-T- t&,:., jZtp6gZrj F4141" R007PKI PL M R.Wr ILL MI WT -w-; (I ftx I A ftR fr,6C. A PER ba AMR) SNKLOS ON City of Moorpark Shrub on Slope Planting Detail late -1 -5 Planning Division Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 61 �� rAft ritR $ ra Rte �+ O wArbt PROM "16W d~41MIN. rA& 0 MW DM W/crux (Z' %M) MW KW � v -,A 646M KKK AtD WI.+U�t MIM ♦! LAdMI J a' N 4RA2 9tAER. FeA" 6OWP LAAA"M Y+-K 7 MY,"bbFMZ D pWP&It 0 A Aj y -" 40 PW6 al 4w Tc iD P1W ?iii !Sd A44t AV*31rm V Mti LATMAL PW PLOW r VIFrH dr Ilr VOOWb ONAvM <v 10 %+� City of Moorpark Planning Division Remote Control Valve Detail 0«0183 Plate 2 -1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 62 KEY in (D vmrm mom ra*r_rrwN LLTiEGTZN ZONMOL YVMt� dVt'O WN TAPE WFES TO - WSERS } DiK�l.i i� REMOfE c&OROL Ml:'t- Pti�. v&m r W RAPtArwN REtiPiTAw F Y!. w MACE Vww rl/c, W~T ai°'`'r� R� TMfr r� ki cr )) $ pvc, scm 4O ELL D PW, LATER& LM (51M PHI ft ^) UtVL: TAFt 6ZNIZIX WF�E:5 AT rEN r4m wnr kvAL:. rrk '4 Fzwmw Ar anu Lam;, cc "sLu Lxk sr ovAr;P5 .op err, VIAOTU MAMP1x. Acv 6"A670N RfEQM OS 5 bAcrgi! - 'iki m r.aA A(,TEP q-j&m TmT w GrTiu.3 acaRF, Ai rEF Fw_.ur C44i_ET 174 A PiTEK rO TR_NGmN& PETAL /RRtNTlb+4 %tcmc_Ar62,r5 FOR LATF.RA. LPZ Ate' PVCAMK i*P Im VA.di;^ZTAI..OMI.ATE d"b -2i City of Moorpark Anti - Siphon OOI Pate �� Planning Division Valve Detail Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 63 � 1 U • I - � yip � jr z" r,�r: i r Mr4 t VWY- TO e-e-, KEY 9?FPX-EP fVf-"-SLn ' V&,LVP PFC�vfJ:7E� MVM bTRAPV -k V NW DKA*O Uj TM L9 ft. & ILPW 9AGf[loi-OA OKEVENTER DL`TAIL,!P�I1'i'L' City of Moorpark O()t31s5 =' Backflow Preventer Detail Plate 2 -3 Planning Division Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 64 V KEY TOP 6r KA.Im 6AAVF- LOW &ALLCUMC ftbh-Eg- A6 PZa*�M AO ELL 68 vve, SCH AO snktrr to 0 PV46 SCH 40 TF-1; OR F 1-7 PY6 LATBR& Pff- FCity of Moorpark -0ate �64 Planning Division Bubbler Detail Pl Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 65 KEY ID PLP-1P OEAR M'.fN SM249.EK PYG Sets w NFR-;: PvG 5cn 40 *9 sl�ff_T ELL �&PVG ! to wmF I..- L:15TPMT EiL ►WG l J MR& LAt kV FITT1NfVS FNS 9i 4 POP -:,P XLv"ort a° -AI6, rr_A, = 2 -!5J c City of Moorpark 000187 5 Planning Division Pop—Up Detail PI ate 2 — Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 66 cy jL 20y" A6 ttoxw` FMWVVVo " t0 AXM )PYZ V a.L )mot= sn4wr cu )*nt=r aL )WL LATM& LK MW HffT*e )PWAt 6FUM - 13 4m )2A-UN aRmv* ROTOR ON 51—OVI P %'r A!- ftw—A'M i-b; 000188 F ity of Moorpark Rotor on Slope Detail Plate 2 -6 lanning Division Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 67 DO 7 1 KEY P4P-AP 6'RAY MA 0 PVC, %:1 W NFY'LZ PV6 6CO AV ELL i PV6 -Xk AO 'SiVL--T CL. 7 PVC -Z" 40 rEE M FU 8 PVC, LAMFUL. F*T- �� f'VG -.1co W NF LF- ��flv Ttt 06 RF.Q(, W. 6' d fNk9I E#tAM aCity of Moorpark Pop- Up Spray OOGIS ► � p Plate 2 -7 Planning Division Head Detail Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 68 c�. KEY — PSG �G+4 Z-0 rsFf't� Ir'Vt si. ; 0 `,: .z. City of Moorpark 000190 °� Planning Division Riser Spray D eta i I IPIate 2 -8 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 69 5 � q 3 I UIRW VAT" teftw. tads . # ' -+Vr To acW W vow TOP or � Ve" N.T.S. 0 TOE Or SL.6FE CANOPY TREE ON LONER -OPE. MArLRE ff "T 6F MES 6KALL. NOT D(C� TOP Of %bPE LOW ORJV'Jl4r7 6rFIL65 o L�C-f- SIFUS wtRTfc,At. TREE NEAR soEYApv LOfLINFS Oft ftXpNe EDGE TO Sa7EN APZ41fTE6TI,R£ V rcP &f 54WE aVF-W FENCE SLOPE PLANTING YY/ VIF—^ FENCE (ELEVATION) (r—IG. 12. 1 ) City of Moorpark Slope Planting W/ View OOG191 "" Planning Division Fence Elevation Fiq• 12.1 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 70 L-07 3 E 2 VAIIM 5 tf tAT os N.T.S. 0 TOE &F S-OFE O 6*40PY P CE ON L1 M3Z �i- � oLOW oL#pMr- O VM716& TRM WAR SVt-YW Lffn -W:K� OR MA -Dt46 EPEE TO 5OMB4 AR& frt6TLRE U TOP 6r SLa'E 3 scfjmN w4L SLOPE PLANTING YV/ SCREEN WALL (ELEVATION) (FIG. 12.2) F ity of Moorpark Slope Planting W/ Screen lanning Division Wall Elevation Fig 12.2 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 71 III f U N.T.5. 10 VMTYI& r� NrM DU I** EME TO WITM ARLt1TLG1Lf;M I 6*4OPY TW ON LA%M SLLP_ AAA AAA "9& fr 6r rap Cr sAWM G) vow rewE 0 TOP or a-01PE C' rot or %A�E SLOP£ PLANTING AT Si1�iGLE- FAMILY RESI�e�tGE (t'L.4N JIEW) (FIG. 1 .�..3) City of Moorpark Slope Planting at Single- Family OCC193 Planning Division Residence (Plan View) Fig. 12.3 Resolution No. PC -2004- Page 72 0 N.T.S. Q%trrv,A_ rPEE w-AP, 60EYAPD Lj9rLkE5_- ,�R WLPW N)C.IE ra -7� ApaiITFLTLRP O&A%Z Y TRU Oro L OY M �_ MtAT1.RE t£Kdir 6w MEP St _ NOT EAC fP rcP cr x"/?FL rov Cr s roE or s. ,rte SLOPE PLANTING AT MULTIPLE - FAMILY R-E51DENCE (PLAN VISI^i) (FIG. 1 2.4) City of Moorpark Slope Planting at Multi - Family 000134 ` Fig. 12.4 " Planning Division Residence (Plan View)