Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1984 0821 PC REGMoorpark, California August 21, 1984 The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, was called to order at 7:14 p.m.. All members were present with the exception of Commissioner Prieto Item 3 - PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. Item 4 - CCM•]ISSION- CCM4ENTS Commissioner Schleve asked that the property management leter from the City Council be on the next Commission agenda for review. Item 5 - PD - 980 (JANSS CORPORATION) Compliance with Condition No. 12 - Final design of rear wall, and Condition No. 58 - sidewalk design. Larry Carignan ( Janss Corproation) represented the applicant. After a review of the proposed change of the design of the reaf wall, it was moved by Commissioner Weak and seconded by Commissioner Schleve to approve the wall design as submitted with the requirement that there be no red stripe painted at the top of the wall. The motion passed unanimously. r In compliance with Condition No. 58, Mr Carignan presented a plan for the sidewalk design. He asked for a " conceptual" approval which would allow Janss Corporation to add planters or brick work to what was shown on the plan. Bricks were to be a 6x12 inch flat red paving brick. Mr. Carignan also requested Commission approval of a bicycle rack design and that there be 4 or 5 bicycle racks set throughout the center in front of the major stores, at the Post Office and along buildings "A" and "G ". It was moved by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner Weak to approve the sidewalk plan as presented, as well as the bicycle racks. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Carignan then asked that the Commission approve a minor chance to the colors for the center to allow slightly lighter colors to be used. It was moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Schleve to permit this change. Item 6 - MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 2 (DP -289 MOORPARK STOW -IT) The applicant, Moorpark Stow -It was represented by John Newton. After dis- cussion with staff and the applicant, the Commiss = indicated that it would be acceptable to, inaddition to recreation vehicles allow recreational boats to be stored on the property. The Commission also indicated that, if the permit returned for additional Commission review in 18 months, the following concerns should be addressed: screening, security lighting, landscaping. and a report on any crimes which had accured within the facility. It was moved by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner Weak to approve the Minor Modification. The motion passed unimously. Item 6.a - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 4220 (BAHER) Request to allow the construction of two farm labor dwelling units on a 68 acre parcel. Byunanimous Commission consent this item was added to the agenda, having been continued from previous Commission meetings. The Commission reviewed a refined plot plan and elevations as presented by the applicant, Hy Baher. The Commission then reviewed Condition No. 29, which had been recommended by staff requiring a reversion to acreage or notice of merger to be recorded. After the close of the public hearing, Condition No. 21 was discussed. Commissioner Wesk indicated that the merger question should be resolved prior to action on the Conditional Use Permit. The remaining members of the Commission indicated that an alternative wording for Condition No. 29 proposed by staff would be acceptable. it was moved by Commissioner Miller to approve the CUP subject to the recommended conditions with Condition No. 29 revised to read as follows: That prior to the issuance of zone clearance of the second farm labor dwelling unit, that a parcel map, reversion to acreage, or a notice of mercy must be recorded for the subject properties. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Schleve and was adopted unanimously. Item 7. - DISCUSSION OF A SPECIAL STUDY FOR GENERAL PLAN GPA -84 -1 The City Council's direction to the Commission on this matter was reviewed, as well as several land use alternatives proposed by staff to be studied. The Matter was also discussed by the commission with Mr. John Newton representing several property owners within the study area. The Commission approved the land use alternatives proposed by staff with the following additions: 1). That the southern one -half of the S &K property be studied as a residential use. 2). That the Planning recommendation to the City Council on a orginal proposal also be studied. 3). That one of the alternatives include only changes to the AC & Gilbert properties. 4). That traffic generation infor- mation for various land uses be detailed when the study returns. The Commission also indicated that a memorandum was to be sent to the Council indicating the progress of the study. Item 8. - STAFF CG14ENTS It was indidcated by the Director of Community Development that he will be on vacation on September 25, and therefore unavailable for the regularly scheduled Commission hearinq. A proposal may be available for hearing at that time and it was indicated by members of the Commission that if warranted, it would be acceptable to hold a special meeting on September 18th. There will be no further business, the Commission adjourned at 10:43 p.m. Secretary