HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1984 0911 PC REGMoorpark, California
September 11, 1984
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California,
was called at 7:11 p.m..
All members were present with the exception of Commissioner Prieto.
Item 3 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of August 28, 1984 were approved 4 - 0.
Item 4 - PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
Item 5 - COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Miller indicated that she would not be able to attend the EARTHQUAKE
PREPAREDNESS CONFRENCE.
Item 6 - DP -303 (Moorpark - L. A.)
Request for approval to construct a 29,912 square foot industrial
building on approximately 1.63 acres.
Following a staff report -back on the feasibility of meandering sidewalks, the
Commission heard from:
Murray Siegel (Siegel & Associates) 5101 Douglas Fir Road, Calabasas,
California.
Nick Brown (West America Construction Corporation) 8929 Wilshire
Blvd., Beverly Hills, California.
Ed Gripp (Landscape Architech) 2161 Victoria Avenue, Oxnard, California.
The Commission reviewed with the applicants representatives the proposed roofing
and building materials as well as the landscaping. Upon inquiry of Chairman Hartley
it was indicated that three roof mounted air conditioning units were proposed.
These would be located in a well over the office area and they would not be
visible from the street. Upon further discussion, the Commission inquired as
to the feasibility of a condition requiring property maintance. It was indicated
theat such a condition could be imposed. Upon the close of the public hearing
it 'was moved by Commissioner Schleve, seconded by Commissioner Weak to rec-
ommend to the City Council approval of the proposal with modifications to
Conditions No. 6, 12, 24, and the addition of Condition No. 59. It was also
indicated that the color of the metal roof should be blue. The motion was
passed 3 - 1, with Commissioner Miller dissenting.
Item 7 - DP -305 (Kenney Manufacturing)
Request for approval to construct a 62,640 square foot industrial
building on approximately 5.64 acres. The building will be used
for warehousing drapes, windo shades and related hardware.
Following staff presentation, the Commission discussed with the applicants
representatives - -Mr. Siegel, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Gripp, -- possible views of
the roof, colors and materials for the structure. It was indicated by Commissioner
Weak, that the colors were not satisfactory and that they should return to the
to the Commission in conformance with Condition No. 14.
Upon motion of Commissioner Schleve, seconded by Commissioner Weak, it was moved
to recommend to the City Council the approval of the proposal with the addition
of Condition No. 58, relating to defered parking improvements, the revised plot
plan indicating the deletion of nine parking spaces near Poindexter Avenue and
with modifications to Conditions No. 6, 12 and the addition of Condition No.
59, indicating property maintance. It was also indicated by Commissioner Weak,
that it should be pointed out to City Council that no fencing was proposed o
the eastern property boundary. The motion was approved 4 - 0.
Item 8 - PD-980 ,(Janss Corporation)
Request for modification to approved store front requirements.
The proposal was presented by Larry Carigan (Janes Corporation) 11075 Santa
Moinca Blvd., Los Angeles, California.
It was indicated that while most store fronts were 20 feet wide, some were 15
and others over 20. The applicant did not wish to change the concept of the
store fronts, just the allowable sizes to permit flexablity to fit all tenants
situations. After review and discussion it was moved by Commissioner Weak to
allow the applicant, subject to the approval of staff, to modify storefronts
to allow;
1. No more than 2 tenants to have alike store fronts.
2. Double doors necessary to accomodate tenant needs.
3. Storefront colors to also be brown for tenant indentity purposes.
4. Storefront bulkhead finish material may be any on of or a
combination of stucco, wood, or tile.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller and approved unanimously.
Item 9 - STAFF COMMENTS
Staff indicated to the Commission the status of General Plan Amendment 84 -1
that a presentation on archtecture was being planed, possibly for October 9th;
that on October 3, the City Council would review a Growth Management Ordinance;
that the City won the lawsuit filed by the Pacifica Corporation regarding School
Facility Fees; and that the FIR for Tract 3998 was being distributed at this
time in advance of the item being on a future agenda.
Item 10 - ADJORNMENT
Chairman Hartley adjorn the meeting at 9:53 to a special meeting to be held
September 18, 1984.
r�
Chairman
Secretary