The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMIN 1986 0122 PC REGPlanning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Page 1 The regular scheduled meeting of the Planmuq Commission held on January 22, 1986 in the City Council Chambers of the Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO CFIM The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Chairman William IaPerch presiding- :� NLF •! a 511 The pledge of allegiance was led by Commissioner Jim Keenan. 3. ROLL CALL PRESEIC: Chairman William LaPerch, Commissioners Dan Claffey, Hartley, Holland, and Keenan; OMM CITY OFFICIAIS: Richard Morton, Interim Director of Community Development; Join Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Diane Eaton, Associate Planner; Julie Hunt, Consultant, McClelland Engineers; and Celia IaFleur, Administrative Secretary. At this point in the agenda Comni.ssiouer Hartley inquired of the Chairman and Commissioners if there are any members who wish to continue any of the public hearing items for further review by the Omission because of the lateness in receiving their Planning Commission packets. On a roll call vote of 4:1 all items on the agenda of January 22, 1986 will be considered. 4. PUBLIC CCMM!N18 By the general consensus of the Commission Item 7.0 Tentative Tract No. 3070 -3 - U.S. Condo shall be taken out of order. 7. CCtMIISSION ACTION ITEMS C. Tentative Tract No. 3070 -3 U.S. Colo Presented by Diane Eaton, Associate Planner. approve Motion: moved by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Comissioner Keenan to m m Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Paine 2 Motion passed on a 5:0 vote. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. RESCUMCK ND. PC -86 -74 CK THE • OF SUN EXPLORATION ••• r CCNPANY. ASSESSOM PAFCEL NO. 1 1 1 1' • •�. • _• by om - Keenan, secomled by ••nn sioner i Holland to approve Resolution No. PC-86-74. passed on a 5:0 vote. At this point in the agenda Commissioner Holland expressed his apologies for his absence of the Commissions meeting of 1- 15 -86, as he understood that the entire meeting of the Commission would be continued to the meeting of 1- 22-86. rrsmussioner Holland complimented the Comission in their review and recommendation to the Council of General Plan Amendment 85 -2. B. RESOEUrICN ND. PC -86 -75 • •, :,r 11 1 I v • r: v i ti: :+ •, a •. cn 2806. ASSESSCR PARCEL NOS. 500 - 35-15, & —27 AND513 -05 -11 AND 511 -09 -06 AND —07 (CAREN). At this point in the agenda Commissioner Claffey stated that he could not recommend approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -75 due to the traffic analysis failed to identify probhm the within the initial checklist in the early morning and midafternoon and is sufficient cause for not recommending certification of the EIR. Commissioner Holland informed the Chairman that the Planning Commission is not obligated to certify the EIR, but only to review it. That the Commission consider amending the resolution recasmended certification of the final EIR to the City Council as being substantially in compliance with COM with the exception of the EIR study on traffic analysis. Commissioner Holland's recommendation to the Commission was to disapprove Resolution No. PC- 86 -75, and request that the public hearing be reopened to canal the adequacy of the Final EIR in relation to traffic analysis and the outcome for future development. Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 1�- Page 3 Cammi.asioner Hartley was in disagreement that the applicant would have to return for further public hearing, considerations needed to mmade to the time and expense of the process. Chaizman IaPerch inquired of staff should the application be reopened for public hearing, wbat timelines is the Caaaission face with. Motion• Commissioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Claffey that this item be tabled to the end of the Commission's agenda. Motion passed unanimously. At this point in the agenda Chairman IaPerch indicated to staff that a resolution reocruenduq to the Council that gross acreage be used in determining density within the city as prescribed by the Zoning Ordinance. RESOLUPICi NO. PC -86 -79 •• , -InIgLe •0 +a•• 10- • 1 • " w •• 0 Leo • MKS, u I' C`•. •9• C' OI :.1 I •.=zi 11 1 I- Motuo Moved by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Comtissi ner Claffey that Resolution No. PC -86 -79 be approved as amended. Motion passed unanimously. Nmn1 P.1 .I ( h !C A. Develco ent Plan Permit Nos. W -320, 321, and 322 - F.E. Financial The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 4 structures containing; a.) 20,720; b.) 13,780; c.) 10,736; d.) 20,720 sq.ft. The proposed project is located on Commerce 400 feet south of Poindexter Avenue. Staff is recommending continuance to February 12, 1986. By the general consensus of the Commission this item. 10 continued to February 12, 1986. B. Development Plan Permit Nos. w -326. 327. 328, 329, 330 and 331 - Poindexter Associates The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 6 structures containing; a.) 8,869; b.) 8,960; c.) 8,960; d.)91404; e.) 17,204; f.) 20,800 sq.ft.. The proposed Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Pace 4 projects are located south of Poindexter between Cabbert and Shasta. Presented by Diane Eaton, Associate Planner. Staff Report dated 1/22/86. Testimony received by the following: I. John Gallawav1 338 Sierra Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Uh=auitted, but had conceals of traffic volume in relation to the 15,100 sq.ft. industrial building and adjacent residential area. 2. Marc AnnottiI the applicant, 6241 Rustling Oaks Drive, Agoura Hills, CA. Concurred with staff's reoomsendation and conditions of approval. The Co mission's concerns related to truck traffic /circulation in regards to school aged children on Poindexter Avenue. Tenant use. tI+ : Moved by Comaissioner Holland, seconded by C missioner Hartley to approve Development Plan Pennit Nos. DP -326, 327, 328, 329, 330 and 331 on the application of Poindexter Associates as reccmnNlded by staff. Motion passed unanimously. At this point in the agenda Coamissioner Holland requested that Item 5.0 be brought back to the agenda and opened with the following: 5. CONSENT CALENDAR C. RESOLiA'ION NO. PC -86 -76 r.• • •I r I' 1 emos 1 • •I e I rr •r r • i I •• � /' 6B• I. VDI 1l9 �. '1:n V I' '� I: s ••.• 5 I/ • 1 I• 0,0401DA111bil'a •. DI •I I;n •'N'i 1 • -1•/ 1 f • •I 19: • I bey Y�.. �•'• 'M:A •. RES(S,MCN N0. PC -86 -77 MMMCK OF THE PLANNDG •r 1 •N OF THE OF •OR • •r CMMMM, CEFdM'Y= THAT THE PLAINNED CUMMM NO. • I W 1 • AND IRESIDMrIAL PLANNED DEVELCEMENT •E160 PE160T No. RPD-1053 Y APPLICATION OF URBAN MW COMMME[TIES. ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 506-01-07, 1' 11 505-12-10. Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 r Page 5 ,:.: •; • • I •• . 1' •5• P ;A •1'•!;x'1:1 Y �' " I: s '•• 5 '.1 • 1 II '+�.. U "s 111 1'.• JI •!• I's ':A •� 1 • '!• • 1 • 1. 1 1' '. • 1 1 Motion: Moaned by Commission Holland, seconded by Commissioner Keenan to approve Resolution Nos. PC- 86 -76, 77 and 78 as presented by staff. Motion passed unanimously. By the request of Commissioner Holland Item 5.B. Resolution No. PC -86 -76 was placed back on the Cc ndesimz's agenda for discussion. B. RESCLUrION NO. PC -86 -75 CALIFORNIA, RUNkRDING TBE APPLICATIONS OF CARLSBERG DUVELaRaw iAND 511-09-06 AND 1 Y '+'s Motion: Moved by Caomissioner Holland, Commissioner Claffey that Resolution No. PC -86 -75 be amended to read as follows: "That the Planning Don nission reviewed and considered the adequacy of the Final EIR assessing the envintal effects of the Carlsberg and Caren project with the provisions, etc. Motion passed unanimously. 6. PUBLIC BEARINGS C. Amendment No. A-85 -3 Ammkywt to the Zoning Ordinance Changes to industrial setback requirements (Article 23) and to parking and loading and unloading space requirements. Presented by Richard Morton, Interim Director of Community Development. Reference: Staff Report dated Jannuary 8, 1986. Gave a brief presentation of the City's current ordinance and stated the Ventura County has adopted a new zoning ordinance with revised standards for development. He further stated that the City 1968 ordinance is outdated in many respects and is very restrictive in snipe Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Paae 6 areas while omitting standards in other areas, and in places difficult to understand. The proposed amendment for consideration covers three separate but related areas: 1.) setbacks in industrial mo es; 2.) parking standards; and 3.) loading and unloading spaces. It was suggested that staff brief the first area followed by any public input and then Commission discussion: and conclusion prior to rowing to the second area. PITT, RU7901 Single Fadmily - Allow 1 of 2 required garages to be a carport "affordable: housing projects as approved by city Council Allow reduction for rehabilitation or expansion of existing homes as approved by Planning Com:issianr/City Council. Multi - family Change present conforming rega *tea+* to: Cmdominiums 2 covered plus (1 bedroom) 1/2 uncovered and (2 or more bedrooms) 3/4 uncovered; Apartments - (1 bedroom) 2 -1/2 spaces, in both use mini== of 1/2 space uncovered. *if 44MO Motion passed unanimously. Discussions by the Cammissic n led to the requirements for commercial use within the downto m area. The summary of the staff report provided the following: Commercial - Change for general eamisrcial from 1 space per 250 square feet per gross floor area to 1 per 300 square feet of gross floor area. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Cammissioner Hartley that the following parking requ *emerrLs for commercial use be recommended as follows: 1 parking per 100 gross floor area for eating establishment use. 1 parking per 200 gross floor area for medical use. 1 per 300 gross floor area for all other commercial uses. Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 - Page 7 Up to 25% variance can be given for any other camercial businesses abutting High Street. Motion passed unanimously. Motion: Moved by Cormai.ssioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Claffey industrial parking req,;*+emm+ *Q be as zecamended by staff with modification to parking stall size 8 -1/2' x 20'. Motion passed unanimously. Motion• Moved by Ca®issioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Hartley to approve staff's reoca endatior► for loading an unloading spas required. That staff poepare a resolution recamanditg that the City Council adopt an ordinance substantially in ca%Aianoe with the follaaing rearmendaticns of the Crnmi ssicn. Motion passed unanimously. 7. CCOaSSICN ACTICN ITEMS A. Decision Making Aeeolutioa�s Motions Moved by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Hartley that the following be recommended for approval by the City Council. Where the Planning Commission is authorized to approve or disapprove an enntitlement, such decision is appealable to the City Council. Where the Director of Cammity Development is authorized to approve or disapprove an entitlement he rein, such decisions is appealable to the Planning Commission and subsequently to the City Council. A request for a Modification to an entitlement small be deemed a "Minor Modificatitn", as determined by the Director of CammmLity Development, when such modificaton does not alter the intent of the determining body. All other modificatu=, and including those where there is doubt as to it's classification, are deemed "Major Modifications" A Major Modification shall be approved or disapproved by the official or body granting the original approval of an appeal• mere the City Council is the body with approving or disapproving authority, the action shall first be processed through the Planning CoumiisSIM for its recammndaticn. Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Page 8 Apprro al or disapproval shall be preformed by the following City Offices of Officials: General Plan adoption or major revision - City Camcil. General Plan Amendment - City Council OrdinsnCe Adoptipn/A t - City Council. Zone Change - City Council. Residential Planned Development Permit - Planning Commission. Commercial Planned Development Permit - Planning Commission. Irx!uatrial Planned Development Permit - Planning Commission. Adainistrative Clearance - Planning CoamisRion. Director Conditional Use Permit - Planning Commission. Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit - Planning commission. Tentative and Final Tract Map - City Council. Parcel Mep and Parcel Map Waiver - Planning Cmui.ssion. lot Line Adjustment and lot Consolidation - Director of Community Development. Variance - Planning Cmmisaim. Minor Modification - Director of Community Development. Motion passed unanimously. Letter addressed to the Cmmrission dated January 13, 1986 referencing items for discussion of Hillside Development Standards, industrial growth monitoring,residential growth and the invact of general plan am enckrent and density bonus. Within Chairman laPerch's letter it was suggested that Ad Hoc Committees be appointed as follows: Industrial/Commercial Impact C omittee - Commissioner's Hartley and Claffey. Requested deadline for report April 15, 1986. Hillside Development Standards Committee - Commissioners Hartley and Holland. Requested deadline for report May 1, 1986. Development Standards Committee - Commissioners Keenan and Claffey. Suggested deadline May 15, 1986. Implementation of 208 Committee - Com dssicnerR LsPerch and Holland. Suggested deadline June 1, 1986. Future Hillsides North and within the city limits of Mooxpark Committee - Commissioners IaPench and Keenan. Suggested deadline May 1, 1986. Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of January 22, 1986 Page 9 The Commission's discussion then opened with comments related to the Gisler field property, the idea of rezoning, zone map amendments, residential planned developuent approval, and moratorium. Testimony received by the following: John Gallaway, 338 Sierra Avenue, Moorpark, CA. Inquired of the Commission as to the direction for Giesler field and their convents to a request for a general plan fit. The Commission then stated that the request was premature and until the City has updated the General Plan Elements to better understand the City's standards for development. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Keenan to approve the Goals and Programs for 1986. Motion passed unanimously. C. Tentative Tract No. TR -3070 U.S. - Fencing Mot' Moved by Coffmissiouer Holland, seconded by C®nissioner Keenan to approve the fencing plan as reccumeded by staff. Motion passed unanimously. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 11 :35 p.m. Cella IaFleur, Secretary �^ : 1 Jobn Wozniak