Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1987 0105 PC REGMoorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 This is the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held January 5, 1987, in the City of Moorpark, California, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m., Interim Chairman Douglas Holland presiding. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Holland. 3. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Douglas Holland, Scott Montgomery, William Butcher, John Wozniak and Bernardo Perez; ABSENT: None; OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Steven Kueny, CIty Manager; Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development; John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Michael A. Rubin, Senior Planner; Diane Eaton, Associate Planner; and Celia LaFleur, Administrative Secretary. 4. REORGANIZATION OF COMMISSION a. Selection of Chairman Moved by Commissioner Montgomery seconded by Commissioner Wozniak for the nomination of Douglas Holland as Chairman. 5: Ayes 0: Noes b. Selection of Vice - Chairman Moved by Commissioner Wozniak seconded by Chairman Holland for the nomination of Scott Montgomery for Vice - Chairman. 5: Ayes 0: Noes C. Comments None. -1- Moorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Steve Brodsky, 4572 Vista del Valle, Moorpark, CA. Spoke in opposition to Cal Prop Residential Planned Development No. RPD -1044, located at the northwest corner of Moorpark and Peach Hill Roads. Mr. Brodsky expressed the following concerns as an adjacent property owner: a. Damage to the rear slope ridge. b. Grading C. Fencing /walls It was the general consensus of the Commission to direct staff to report back at the Commissions meeting of January 19, 1987 with the concerns raised by Mr. Brodsky. Tom Zanic, representative of Urban West Communities, 520 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, CA. Spoke in opposition the the Revised Sign Code Ordinance No. 82 and requested the Commission to start the process to amend the Sign Ordinance to allow "pole flags" (i.e. model home complexes). Toni Solano, representative of Griffin Homes, 24005 Ventura B1., Calabasas, CA. Spoke in opposition to the Sign Ordinance and supported the need for flag signs at model home complexes. Chairman Holland presented his views to the original recommendation of: 1) subdivision signs be precluded; 2) possible change to window signs (example PD- 1047 /Park Lane neighborhood shopping center referenced); By general consensus of the Commission staff was directed to report back to the Commissions meeting of February 16, 1987 regarding the concerns expressed of the Sign Ordinance. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued Business) a. Residential Plann( mit No. RPD -1058 Glen Request to construct 22 single family residences on a previously approved 22 lot subdivision (TR- 3306). Located on Inglewood Ave. between Peach Hill Road and the Southern California Edison Company easement. Presented. by the Senior Planner; reference: Staff Report dated January 5, 1987. After a brief discussion by the Commisison the following testimony was received: H.A. "Russ" Russell, representative of Glen Haven, 2169 Via Tomas, Camarillo, CA. Spoke in support of this residential planned development. -2- Moorpark Planning Commission r City of Moorpark "t January 5, 1987 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued Business a. Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1058 Glen Haven Continued. The following testimony received by: Louis Meifert, 13191 Colondrina, Moorpark, CA. Jan Weaver, 4238 Palomitas Circle, Moorpark, CA. Ronald Funfar, 13135 E. Golondrina Street, Moorpark, CA. Linda Todd, 4305 NW Cloverdale, Moorpark, CA. Jeff Rosen, 4365 Ashtree, Moorpark, CA. E. Warren Bossard, 1670 Elsvow Ct., Westlake Village, CA. Wayne Moore, architect representing the applicant, 22900 Ventura Blvd. Woodland Hills, CA. Tom Wolfington, engineer representing the applicant, Widmer & Associates, 790 Hampshire Road, Suite B, Westlake Village, CA. The above testimony received in support of the residential planned - development, local Moorpark residents although in support of the development expressed the following concerns: a. Stop signs at the intersections of Honeybee /Cloverdale, east at Inglewood /Cloverdale; b. Condition development for truck traffic on Cloverdale. C. No deliveries at the construction site until 9:00 a.m. d. Construction site start construction time at 8:00 a.m. e. Fencing at the Southern California Edison Company Easement, i.e. height, landscaping, berming, maintenance, safetly of school aged children. f. Request for the 22 lots to provide single story homes only. After extensive discussion by the Commission, staff and the applicant, it was moved by Commissioner Wozniak seconded by Commissioner Montgomery that RPD -1058, :as conditions of approval,include the following: a. 6' masonry wall at the Southern California Edison Company Easment with 5' landscape area and that the maintenance be provided at the south tip of the Todd property. b. A change from 2 -story to single story requires only the approval of the Director of Community Development. C. Construction start and delivery time concerns expressed by the residents be addressed. -,r Motion passed unimously. Moved by Commisisoner Montgomery seconded by Chairman Holland, that 208 of park fees collected be provided for a "Community Pool Fund" and that the balance be provided for the improvements of the Peach Hill Park site. Motion dies for the lack of a roll call vote. -3- Moorpark Planning City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued Business) a. Residnetial Planned Devleopment Permit No. 1058 Glen Haven Continued. Commission Moved by Commissioner Perez seconded by Commissioner Butcher that the recommendation of ViceChairman Montgomery on the preceeding motion be addressed to the Parks & Recreation Commission for discussion to provide a policy of split funds and discussion at the Commission meeting of January 19, 1987. 5: Ayes 0: Noes Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commisisoner Montgomery as a condition of approval that the Parks & Recreation Commisison provide a recommendation of approval for park fees. 5: Ayes 0: Noes Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commisisoner Montgomery that only the Directors approval shall be required for additional single story homes for the 22 lot subdivision. 5: Ayes 0: Noes Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commisisoner Wozinak that a condit- ion of approval to include a method of redesign for Lots 22 & 19 re 2'additional setback (south elevation to be turned to face east or west). 5: Ayes 0: Noes Moved by Commisisoner Buttcher seconded by Commisisoner Montgomery to recommend Residential Planned Development Permit No. 1058 for approval of the revised site plan with 9 two -story and 13 single story plans and with the street configuration as proposed originally by the applicant; 2) Make the findings and approve the Negative Declaration as recommended in the December 10, 1986 staff report; 3) Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending to the City Council conditional approval of RPD -1058 for consideration at its next regular meeting of January 19, 1987. 5: Ayes 0: Noes -4- Moorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued Business) a. Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1058 Glen Haven Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commisioner Wozniak that the developer shall provide an irrevokeable offer for landscape easement on approximately 3' of the lots abutting the south property line. 5: Ayes 0: Noes 9:38 Recess 9:55 Reconvine By general consensus Item 6.c. Tentative Parcel Map No. 4220, take out of order. C. Tentative Parcel Ma2 No. 4220 Clifford & Christina May Request to subdived an existing 3.48 acre lot into three parcels of nearly equal size. Located on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Moorpark Road and Nogales Avenue. Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commissioner Wozniak that this item be continued to complete the following requirements as addressed in staffs memo of January 5, 1987 recommending continuance to 1/19/87: ° A tentative map completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ° A set of standards for private streets. ° A list of conditions of approval. 5: Ayes 0: noes b. Planned Development Permit No. PD -1056 Burger King, Herman li /Daniel Chu Requesting approval to construct a Burger King Restaurant. The restaurant will contain approximately 3,074 sq.ft. Located at the southwest corner of Los angeles /Moorpark Avenues. The site fronts Los Angeles Avenue. Presented by the Associate Planner; reference: Staff Report dated January 5, 1987. After extensive discussion by the Commission, staff, the applicant proceeded to give his testimony in support of the development. Herman Li, representing Burger King, 21601 Vanowen Street, Suite 201, Canoga Park, CA. Spoke in support of the development and it was of the opinion that this development could accommodate the concerns of staff and the Commission. -5- Moorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued Business) b. Planned Development Permit No. PD -1056 Burger King, He WI Continued. The Commission continued to address the concerns of staff to the appli- cant. The major concern of staff and the Commission was due to the location of the site and its proximity to the intersection of Moorpark/ Los Angeles Avenues relating with ingress /egress, left hand turn move- ments on Los Angeles Avenue. Moved by Chairman Holland seconded by Commissioner Montgomery to support staffs recommendation for denial re the subject of location as discussed in the staffs report dated January 5, 1987. Motion receded. Moved by Vice - Chairman Montgomery seconded by Commissioner Wozniak to continued Planned Development Permit No. PD -1056 for 30 days to enable the applicant to provide a redesign, to accommodate the concerns addressed, i.e. landscape, ingress /egress as a major factor. 5: Ayes 0: Noes As a request of the Commission to direct staff to provide a report addressing the issue of traffic circulation and the Level of Service. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS a. Development Plan Permit No. DP- 355/357, Moorpark /Los Angeles Landscape review per Condition No. 10 of the previously approved Resolution Nos. PC -86 -113 and 114 of DP- 355/357 The Director gave an overall review of the previously development plan and concurred with the Commission for approval. Moved by Vice - Chairman Montgomery seconded by Commissioner Wozniak for approval of the landscaping plan submitted by DP- 355/357. 5: Ayes 0: Noes b. Cal Wallreview per Condition No. 25 of the previously approved Resolution No. 85 -240 of RPD -1044. cm 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS I:li T Continued. fa Moorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 Moved by Vice - Chairman Montgomery seconded by Commissioner Wozniak to continued this item for the Commissions meeting of January 19, 1987 to address the concerns expressed by Mr. Steve Brodsky an adjacent property owner. 5: Ayes 0: Noes 8. INFORMATION ITEMS DISTRIBUTED a. Industrial Buildout This item was table for discussion to the Commission meeting of January 19, 1987. b. Brown Act C. Conflict of Interest - dated July 31, 1986 d. Permit Approval Process - Resolution No. 86 -276 e. City of Moorpark Map f. Land Use Map g. Subdivision Map Act Manual - 1986 Edition h. California Land Use and Planning Laws i. Planning Commission Handbook - distributed at 1/19/87 meeting j. Building Industry Association of Southern California Summons dated December 3, 1986 and City of Moorpark Full Test of Measure "F" k. The Language of Zoning - A Glossary of Words and Phrases 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Perez addressed staff regarding the implementation procedures relating to Measure "F ". The Director stated that the City Council in the near future will be discussing this matter and a report will be provided with the background information. -7- Moorpark Planning Commission City of Moorpark January 5, 1987 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS It was the general consensus of the the Commission that staff address/ provide the following concerns: a. Draft resolution for discussion of a "Community Pool Fund ", provide for the Commissions meeting of February 2, 1987. b. Draft a resolution for January 19th Planning Commisison agenda relating to the General Plan Update (i.e. Land Use and Circulation). C. Provide the Commission with Chairman Holland memo relating to Local Planning Ordinance dated May 23, 1986. d. Provide an annual work program for the Department of Community Development Department. 10. STAFF COMMENTS None. 11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the Planning Commission meeting adjourned, the time being 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Celia LaFleur, Acting Secretary