HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1989 0417 PC REGl--
Planning Comission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of April 17, 1989
Pane 1
The regular scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission held on April 17,
1989 in the City Council Chambers of the Community Center located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m., Chairman Holland
presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance was led by Councilmember Lawrason.
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Chairman Douglas Holland; Vice Chairman John Wozniak;
Commissioner's; Bill Lanahan; Glen Schmidt.
ABSENT: None.
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND
Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development;
John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Mark Wessel, Traffic
Engineer; Deborah S. Traf£enstedt, Senior Planner; Celia
LaFleur, Administrative Secretary.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. William LaPerch, 7200 Walnut Canyon Road, Moorpark, CA. Spoke on
behalf of the Moorpark Central Neighborhood Council which met on
April 12, 1989 to discuss the proposal for Gisler Field. In his
prepared statement dated April 17, 1989 stated the following
concerns with the proposed project:
a. Impact on Los Angeles Avenue (traffic circulation)
b. Completing the widening of Los Angeles Avenue prior to the
implementation of such a commercial project.
C. High density housing in the surrounding single story housing.
It was the general consensus of the Commission that a notice of future
infomation papers on the proposal be provided to neighborhood councils
within the Poindexter Avenue, Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue
residential areas .
Planning Co®ission, City of. Moorpark, California
Minutes of April 17, 1989
Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of April 3, 1989
Motion(a) : Moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner
Lanahan to approve the minutes of April 3, 1989 as
submitted.
Motion passed on a 4:0 vote.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
None.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Old Business)
A. Industrial Planned Development Permit Nos. IPD -88 -8 through 88 -17
(Moorpark West)
Construction of ten industrial buildings on separate lots. The total,
combined floor area is 86,146 sq.ft. Located east of Maureen Lane,
west of bonsai Avenue, and approximately 600 feet north of Los Angeles
Avenue. Continued from April 3, 1989.
Testimony received from the following:
1. Nick Brown, representing West America, 8929 Wilshire Blvd.,
Beverly Hills, CA. Referenced Condition No. 97, by stating that
the applicant had already paid $70,000 prior to issuance of a
zoning clearance for DP's 393 -404, in association with LDM -10
which represents half of the estimated project cost to construct
the traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane and Los
Angeles Avenue.
2. Tom Montgomery, representing Thomas S. Montgomery Associates
Transportation and Traffic Engineers. Spoke in support of the
project. Stated to the Commission that signalization could be
warranted only by development, signalization would not be provided
prior to the development.
3. William E. Mason, 437 Shasta Avenue, Moorpark, CA. Protested the
application proposed by Moorpark West. Mr. Mason stated traffic
circulation is extremely difficult at the intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue and Shasta Avenue and that any more development
would only impact the current circulation problem. Also noted
that the rear of industrial buildings located on Goldman had trash
and debris that was visable to the residential area adjacent to
!l— the buildings.
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of April 17, 1989
Page 3
The Commission continued to discuss the timelines for widening of Los
Angeles Avenue, how many travel :Lanes would be provided, and permit
issuenace concurrent with signalization.
Motion(b): Moved by Commissioner Lanahan, seconded by
Commissioner Wozniak that the Commission has evaluated
the proposed final Negative Declaration and has
determined it to be adequate and complete. That
Condition No. 13 be deleted; Condition No. 16 be
modified by deleting "........and approved
by ..................."; Condition No. 24 to remain as
submitted; Condition No. 55 be modified to read:
"The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for
review a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer. ";
Condition No. 64 be redrafted to read:
"The applicant shall make a supplementary contribution
to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution in the
!— amount of $70,000 which is to be paid once for the
associated LDM -10, DP's 393 -404, and IPD's 88 -8 to
88 -17. This supplementary contribution represent half
of the estimated project cost to construct the traffic
signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane at Los
Angeles Avenue. (The $70,000 was paid prior to
issuance of a zoning clearance for DP's 393 -404. The
City Engineer's office intends to use $5,000 of this
money to conduct a traffic signal warrant study for the
Maureen Lane /Los Angeles Avenue signal.)"
Condition No. 97 be redrafted to read:
"A contract shall have been let for the widening of the
north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Maureen Lane
and Gisler Avenue and for the installation of a traffic
signal at the intersection of Maureen Lane and Los
Angeles Avenue, prior to the issuance of any building
permit."
Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one Commissioner vacancy).
Motion(c): Moved by Commissioner Lanahan, seconded by Commissioner
Wozniak to modify Condition No. 54 relating to graffiti
removal within ten days from written notification by
the City of Moorpark.
Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one Commissioner vacancy).
/_
Planning Coomission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of April 17, 1989
Page 4
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS (New Business)
A. Draft Housing Element of the General Plan
The Planning Commission will consider a draft of the revised Housing
Element of the General Plan as required by Article 10.6 of the
Government Code. A periodic updating of the City's Housing Element is
mandated by law every five years.
Presented by Director Richards. It was the general consensus of the
Commission to continue this item to their meeting of May 1, 1989 and
that the County Planning Program related to population be provided to
the Commission at such time.
9. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS
A. Report of Conformity with the General Plan for the Moorpark
Redevelopment Project
As part of the process to approve a Redevelopment Plan for the
Moorasrk Redevelopment Project, the Commission is requested to review
the plan and determine it's conformity with the City's General Plan.
Presented by John Huffman, Urban Futures, who gave the Commission a
presentation. No other speakers on the matter. Chairman Holland
requested that the following matters be addressed in the project
report.
a. That there be some statement regarding the conflict of interest
issues associated with redevelopment.
b. That all agreements, contracts, "deals" created by the agency
should be tied to the approval of an entitlement request.
Motion(d): Moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Chairman
Holland to approve staff's recommendation that the
Planning Commission review the proposed Redevelopment
Plan, Draft EIR and Conformity Report making comments
as deemed appropriate; and that the Planning
Commission determines that the plan is conforming with
the City's General Plan. That the following be be
addressed in the project report:
a. That there be some statement regarding the
conflict of interest issues associated with
redevelopment.
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of April 17, 1989
Page 5
b. That all agreements, contracts, "deals" created by
the agency should be tied to the approval of an
entitlement request.
Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one Commissioner vacancy).
10. INFORMATION ITEMS
A. Proposed Fire Station within Planned Community 3 (Urban West
Communities)
Ventura County proposal to construct an 8,000 sq.ft wood frame and
stucco fire station at the southwest corner of Mountain Trail Street
and Cedar Springs Street.
Motion(e): Moved Vice Chairman Wozniak, seconded by Commissioner
Lanahan to approve staff's recommendation that the
proposed location for the new County Fire Station is
conforming to the City's General Plan.
B. Impact Sciences, Inc.
Information paper discussing proposed development west of the Moorpark
Town Center. Continued from April 3, 1989.
Received and filed.
11. COMMISSION COMMENTS
Vice Chairman Wozniak noted two concerns; a need to relocate or
provide a better sign which is located on Spring Road indicating "Not
a Through Street ", in order to eliminate confusion and misdirection
during traffic congestion; and sign violations advertising the
Woodcreek Apartments on Spring Road during the weekend.
12. STAFF COMMENTS
13.
There being no further business the meeting of the Planning Commission
adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED May 1, 1989,
BY:
Celia LaFleur, Secretary
CHAI MA ESIDING: ( / // /J
:'lam - Date �,