The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMIN 1989 0717 PC REGPlanning Co®iasion, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of July 17, 1989 Pdge 1 The regular scheduled meeting of the 1989 in the City Council Chambers of Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER Planning Commission held on July 17, the Community Center located at 799 The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m., Vice Chairman John Wozniak presiding. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Vice Chairman Wozniak. 3. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Vice Chairman John Wozniak; Commissioner's Michael Scullin; Bill Lanahan; Glen Schmidt. ABSENT: None (one vacancy). OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND REPRESENTATIVES: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development; John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner; Celia LaFleur, Administrative Secretary, 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS I k) 6RT-1 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of June 19, 1989 Motion: Moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner Scullin to approve the minutes of June 17, 1989 as submitted. Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one vacancy). 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Resolution No. PC -89 -196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM AS ADEQUATE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOS. IPD -88 -3 THROUGH IPD -88 -5, AND INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. -1- Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of July 17, 1989 Page 2 B. Resolution No. PC -89 -197 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -3 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIEGEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. /WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORP. C. Resolution No. PC -89 -198 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -4 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIEGEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. /WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORP. D. Resolution No. PC -89 -199 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -5 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIEGEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. /WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORP. E. Resolution No. PC -89 -200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM AS ADEQUATE FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -6 AND INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. F. Resolution No. PC -89 -201 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -6 ON THE APPLICATION OF S&B MORTGAGE INVESTMENT, INC. COMPANY. INC. /WEST AMERICA CONSTRUCTION CORP. G. Resolution No. PC -89 -202 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD -88 -2 AND VARIANCE NO. V -88 -2 ON THE APPLICATION OF ROBERT & SHARON RIDDLE. Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Wozniak, seconded by Commissioner Lanahan to approve Resolution Nos. PC -89 -196, PC -89 -197, PC -89 -198, PC -89 -199, PC- 89- 200,PC -89 -201, Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one vacancy). -2- Planning Comission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of July 17, 1989 Page 3 Motion: Moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner Scullin that Resolution No. PC -89 -202 be modified to reflect that the application was denied without prejudice 7. PUBLIC BEARINGS A. The applicant is requesting an Industrial Planned Development permit for a 34 ft. high one story industrial building with mezzanine. The building as proposed would have a total of 112,400 square feet to be built on a 313,632 square foot lot. The proposed industrial planned development is located at 800 Science Drive. The site is a vacant parcel at the end of Science Drive, north of Los Angeles Avenue within the City of Moorpark in the County of Ventura. Presented by Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner: reference; staff report dated July 17, 1989. Testimony received by the following: 1. Valerie Busby, Vice President, representing Cabot, Cabot & Forbes 2801 Townsgate Road, Suite 101, Westlake, CA. Ms. Busby expressed her concerns with the following conditions: Condition No. 33 - The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark an amount of $.25 per squrare foot of gross floor area to support the city's current and future park system. Condition No. 35 The applicant shall make a one -time monetary contribution to Commuter Computer of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund ridesharing programs. Condition No. 44 - Roof equipment shall be painted the same color as the roof, and no ducting shall be permitted on the roof exterior. Roof treatment shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of community Development prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance. Condition No. 47 - The applicant shall prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and be subject to any underground utility agreeing -3- Planning Co=ission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of July 17, 1989 Page 4 to participate in the formation of an be subject to any undergound utility assessment district or other financing technique including but not limited to the payment of fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund the undergrounding of utilities directly or indirectly affected by the development. 2. Dave Thoms, Landscape Architect, Erickson, Peters, Thoms Landscape Architect, Pasadena. In support of the development. 3. Jon Loring, Project Architect, Barasch Architects, 325 E. Millcrest Drive, #195, Thousand Oaks, CA. In support of the development. The Commission modified Condition No. 44 as follows:\ Roof equipment shall be painted so that it does not void factory warranty information and be of a harmonious color as the roof. No ducting shall be permitted on the roof exterior. Roof treatment shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance. Motion: Moved by commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner Lanahan that Industrial Planned Development Permit No. IPD -88 -7 be approved as modified and direct staff to draft resolutions to be considered at the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 7, 1989 recommending that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program and that Council conditionally approve IPD -88 -7. Motion passed on a 4:0 vote (one vacancy). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS None. COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Lanahan asked staff what the status was of the Commission's request to have the City Attorney give an opinion as to why she had recommended to the Council the deletion of a Commission recommendation. Staff advised that they would look into it. Commissioner Lanahan requested staff to seek a reply from Council as to why the City Attorney could not attend Commission meetings. Commissioner Schmidt spoke at length on the need to do something about the -4- r Planning Comission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of July 17, 1989 Page 5 overcrowding in the downtown area of the City. The Commission needs to hold a study session on this subject. The Commission needs to have more information from staff. STAFF COMMENTS Staff noted a revised schedule regarding the proposed shopping center on Los Angeles Avenue (west of Moorpark Town Center) and related apartment project. Staff advised the Commission that a contract had been signed with the firm of PBR to process the General Plan Update. Staff advised the Commission that work was in progress on the Carlsberg Specific Plan. There being not further business the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: Celia LaFleur, Secretary VICE CHAIRMAN PRESIDING: -5- Date 11-6e?