The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMIN 1990 0205 PC REGITEM Ll. S. t- Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California February 5, 1990 The regular scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was held on February 5, 1990 in the City Council Chambers of the Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m., Chairman Wozniak presiding. 2. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Wozniak. 3. Roll Call Present: Chairman John Wozniak; Vice Chairman William Lanahan; Commissioners Glen Schmidt; and Roy Talley. Absent: Commissioner Michael Scullin (excused absence). Other City Officials and Representatives: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development; Deborah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner; Paul Porter, Senior Planner; John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; and Celia LaFleur, Administrative Secretary. 4. Approval of Minutes January 15, 1986 January 22, 1986 September 10, 1986 December 18, 1989 The minutes of January 15, 1986, January 22, 1986, September 10, 1986 and December 18, 1989 were approved as submitted by the following motion: Motion: Moved by Vice Chairman Lanahan, seconded by Commissioner to approve the Planning Commission minutes of January 15, 1986, January 22, 1986, September 10, 1986 and December 18, 1989 as submitted. Motion passed on a 4:0:1 vote, Commissioner Scullin absent. Page 5. Public Comments None. 6. Consent Calendar 7. Public Hearings A. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. IPD -89 -2 Annotti and Petrilli Construction of a one - story, 24 foot high industrial building containing 32,650 sq.ft. (5,500 sq.ft. office, and 27,150 sq.ft. manufacturing). The proposed industrial development is located on a 77,223 sq.ft. parcel of land located at the terminus of Razuko Court. Presented by Paul Porter, Senior Planner. Reference: Staff Report dated February 5, 1990. At the conclusion of the presentation the Commission expressed the following concerns: Height and setback of surrounding buildings. Wall which would divide the industrial zone area from the residential zone area and the height and length of such wall. The existing underground tank adjacent to the industrial property and adjacent residential area with relation to health and safety factors. Testimony received by the following: 1. Marc Annotti - 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Calabasas, CA. The applicant stated his intention to provide a linear 30 foot wall at 6 feet in height and heavily landscaped after previously meeting with the surrounding property owners and discussing their views and concerns. Mr. Annotti referenced Condition No. 39 in relation to the $25,600 which would be require for the replacement value of trees to be removed. His request to the Commission was to provide the $25,600 for replacement m5Feb90 Planning Commission. City of Noorpark. California 2 Minutes of February 5, 1990 Page 5. Public Comments None. 6. Consent Calendar 7. Public Hearings A. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. IPD -89 -2 Annotti and Petrilli Construction of a one - story, 24 foot high industrial building containing 32,650 sq.ft. (5,500 sq.ft. office, and 27,150 sq.ft. manufacturing). The proposed industrial development is located on a 77,223 sq.ft. parcel of land located at the terminus of Razuko Court. Presented by Paul Porter, Senior Planner. Reference: Staff Report dated February 5, 1990. At the conclusion of the presentation the Commission expressed the following concerns: Height and setback of surrounding buildings. Wall which would divide the industrial zone area from the residential zone area and the height and length of such wall. The existing underground tank adjacent to the industrial property and adjacent residential area with relation to health and safety factors. Testimony received by the following: 1. Marc Annotti - 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Calabasas, CA. The applicant stated his intention to provide a linear 30 foot wall at 6 feet in height and heavily landscaped after previously meeting with the surrounding property owners and discussing their views and concerns. Mr. Annotti referenced Condition No. 39 in relation to the $25,600 which would be require for the replacement value of trees to be removed. His request to the Commission was to provide the $25,600 for replacement m5Feb90 Planning Commission. City of Moorpark. California 3 Minutes of February 5, 1990 Page trees, or trees of a more maturity. 2. Phyllallenn Mason, 1364 Park Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804. Mrs. Mason proceeded to narrate a video which filmed the site and addressed the concerns of surrounding property owners. 3. Bill Mason, 1364 Park Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804. Concurred with the areas of concern stated by Mrs. Mason. 4. Don Grinder, 363 Shasta Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Mr. Grinder was concerned with the fencing in relation to grading and the overall height. He preferred a 6 ft. in height and earthtone in color. 5. John Mason, 413 Shasta, Moorpark, CA 93021. Mr. Mason provided an overhead view of scaled difference proposed by providing a building at 16 ft. in height vs. the 24 ft. building height. Commissioners stated the following concerns: . That the applicant consider reducing the building height. That the $25,600 for the value of the trees being removed be put back into the project for additional landscaping. That the applicant consider the entire length of the 30 foot buffer as landscaped area and run the length of the adjacent property owners rear yard. That the applicant provide soil testing for the area surrounding the tank. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT: 8:50 P.M. BREAK: 8:55 RECONVENE: 9:05 P.M. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Lanahan, seconded by Commissioner Talley that Industrial Planned Development Permit No. IPD -89 -2 be returned to the Commission's meeting of March 19 with the following modifications, revisions and considerations. m5Feb90 Planning Commission, City of Mp2a3ark, California 4 Minutes of February 5, 1990 That the applicant consider a revised plan showing a reduced height. Condition No. 13 - correct to read M -1 zone (delete M- 2). Condition No. 39 - That the $25,600 for the value of the trees being removed be put back into the project for additional landscape over and above that normally required. Condition No. 50 - regarding hazardous waste. "..... employ dispose or produce hazardous materials. Condition No. 76 - delete "...as to eliminate...." That the 30 ft. landscape buffer provide the deletion of the four parking spaces provided require landscaping from end to end adjacent to the residential property owners. Condition No. 57 - change within 30 days to remove graffiti to "shall be removed within 5 days of notice by the City." Condition No. 72 be revised and require stronger language in order to meet the adjacent property owners concerns in relation to soil testing. That a 6 ft. wall in height be provided along and adjacent to the residential properties. This wall shall be earthtone in color. Motion passed on a 4:0 vote. B. Zone change No. Z -90 -1 City of Moorpark Rezoning of R -1 (One Family Residential) and R -E (Rural Exclusive) zoned properties, to RPD (Residential Planned Development). Various locations citywide as identified by the Assessor Parcel numbers. In some case only a portion of a lot is proposed to be rezoned to RPD. A map of the areas proposed for rezoning is on file with the Community Development Department. m5Feb90 Planning Commission. City of Moorpark. California 5 Minutes of February 5, 1990 Page Presented by Debbie Traffenstedt, Senior Planner. Reference: Staff Report dated February 2, 1990. Testimony received by the following: 1. Lowell N. Richards, 287 Casey Road, Moorpark, CA. Mr. Richards stated his concerns with the impersonal approach of notification provided to the property owners. Also commented on the language which was provided in Ordinance No. 117, and 118 in relation to the urgency of the ordinance as it referenced a danger to health, safety, etc. 2. Pam Castro, 479 Charles Street, Moorpark, CA. In opposition to rezoning. Directed her concerns to the Commission by stating that the rezoning would only hurt any of the long time residents in providing any improvements, and fees should be charged accordingly, owner /occupant vs. developer. Ms. Castro stated that she �^ was unaware of the urgency of rezoning, and as a MUSD Board Member she was unaware of any consideration being taken on the school site. 3. V.G. McQueen, 387 Bonnieview, Moorpark, CA. In opposition to rezoning. 4. Carolyn Cummings, 872 Valley Road, Moorpark, CA. In opposition to rezoning. PUBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT: 10:15 P.M. Commissioners stated the following concerns: That the rezoning would require more time for review. Expiration date of Ordinance No. 118 - April 29, 1990. Residents should be provided with more information as to the urgency of the rezoning. Consideration should be given to larger and small property . Clarify the purpose, and approach for addressing issues and the opportunity for the public to respond. m5Feb90 PlanningCoumission. City of Moorpark. California 6 Minutes of February 51 1990 Page Concerned with the rezoning of the school property. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Lanahan, seconded by Commissioner Talley to continue this item to a date uncertain in order that the City Council provide more specific direction to the Commission and extend the moratorium 90 days in order to provide further review. Motion passed on a 4:0 vote. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS None. 9. INFORMATION ITEMS Report back regarding the Texaco Gasoline Station at 347 Moorpark Avenue. 10. COMMISSION COMMENTS Schedule for the Los Angeles Avenue widening project at Tierra Rejada and Spring Roads. Planning Commissioners Institute - deadline February 28, 1990. 11. STAFF COMMENTS The Commission's next meeting will be held on Tuesday February 20 due to the holiday on February 19, 1990. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 5/7/99000 BY: Celia LaFleur, Secretary m5Feb90 Chairman presiding: