HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1993 0719 PC REGf
Planning commission, city of Moorpark, California
Minutes of July 19, 1993
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 19,
1993 in the City Council Chambers. Located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
Chairman Michael H. Wesner Jr called the meeting to order
at 7:11 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Chairman Wesner led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Steve Brodsky, Christina May, Barton Miller,
John Torres; and Chairman Michael Wesner Jr.
Jim Aguilera, Director of Community
Development; Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior
Planner; Paul Porter, Senior Planner; Charles
Abbott, City Engineer; Dirk Lovett, Assistant
City Engineer; and Celia LaFleur,
Administrative secretary.
Absent: None.
4. PROCLAMATIONB, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO TEE AGENDA:
It was the consensus of the Commission to reorder agenda
Item 10.A prior to the Public Hearing portion of the
agenda.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved and Commissioner May
seconded a motion to approve the Planning
Commission minutes of June 21, 1993.
Motion passed by a 5:0 voice vote.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
No public comments presented to the Commission.
r
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes Of July 19, 1993
8. CONSENT CALENDAR:
No items were scheduled for Consent Calendar.
10.A Housing Element / Regional Housing Needs Assessment
This was an informative item as requested by the
Commission. Senior Planner Traffenstedt informed the
Commission as to the status of several housing issues
along with inclusionary zoning.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Carlsberg Specific Plan and Draft EIR - Carlsberg
Financial Corporation
Entitlement: Amendments to Carlsberg Specific Plan and
Draft EIR, Amendment to Land Use Element of the General
Plan to reflect amended land uses, and amendment to the
City's Zoning Ordinance to adopt amended land use
regulations of the Specific Plan as Zoning for property.
Proposal: Several text changes to the approved Carlsberg
Specific Plan as well as the following amendments to the
land uses within the Specific Planning area:
Land Use
1.
S.F. (Planning Area A)
2.
S.F. (Planning Area B)
3.
S.F. (Planning Area D)
4.
S.F. (Planning Area C)
S.
Institutional
6.
BP /SR/C
7.
Sub - regional Retail
and Commercial
8.
Commercial/Restaurant
9.
Park
10. Open Space
11.
Primary Roads
TOTALS
Gross Acres Dwelling Units
40
46
37
32
7
27
43.5
2.5
9.0
221.4
17.5
4829
145
138
109
160
552
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of July 19, 1993
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED)
Carlsberg Specific Plan and Draft EIR - Carlsberg Financial
Corporation
Amendment to Land Use Element of the General Plan to reflect
amended land uses, and amend City's Zoning Ordinance to adopt
amended land use regulations of Specific Plan as Zoning for
property.
Location: The Carlsberg Specific Plan is located on 500 acres
of land in the southeastern portion of the City of Moorpark.
The site is bounded by the Arroyo Simi and New Los Angeles
Avenue to the north, Spring Road to the west, Tierra Rejada
Road to the south, and the Moorpark Freeway (State Highway 23)
to the east.
The Commission requested the Consultant to outline the public
hearing procedures for the Planning Commission's review. Mr.
Sakowicz said that (1) review of the Specific Plan and the
findings of the Environmental Impact Report; (2) staff and
consultant response to any questions of the Planning
Commission; (3) a presentation of the Specific Plan by the
project applicaant; (4) public testimony regarding the
adequacy of the EIR and input on the project; (5) any further
discussion between the Commission, staff and the project
applicant. Mr. Sakowicz also informed the Commission that
they may recommend continuing the hearing.
The public hearing opened at 7:31 p.m.
Eric Sakowicz made a presentation (reference: Staff Report
dated July 7, 1993) and provide illustrations of the currently
approved Specific Plan and the amended Specific Plan. A
comparison of these plans, and a brief description of the
proposed amendment was provided.
Testimony received by:
Ron Tankersley, Carlsberg Financial Corporation, 2800 Twenty
Eight Street, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Mr. Tankersley addressed some of the concerns presented by the
Commission. He said he would return at the next meeting of
the Planning Commission with illustrations that better
presented the proposed amendment.
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of July 19, 1993
The Commission directed staff to report back at the next
Planning Commission meeting with the following information:
a. Compare the existing residential densities west of Spring
Road versus densities proposed as part of Specific Plan
Units B & D.
b. Discuss Housing Element policies of the General Plan and
how the Specific Plan is consistent, or inconsistent with
those policies?
C. Landform techniques, will techniques be used to promote
naturally appearing site or will conventional grading
techniques be used?
d. Provide information regarding traffic impacts at the
Spring Road /Tierra Rejada Road intersection.
e. Provide information regarding the grading and its phasing
(- plan.
f. Could single story homes at the west side of Spring Road
be incorporated?
g. That the applicant submit a model of contour grading
proposed for the Specific Plan area.
h. Consider a multi - family use within the Specific Plan area
and develop standards for multi - family housing.
MOTION: Chairman Wesner moved and Commissioner Brodsky
seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to
the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission.
Motion passed by a 5:0 voice vote.
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. Housing Element / Regional Housing Needs Assessment
Reordered and previously presented.
B. July 7, 1993 City Council Annotated Agenda
!� Staff reviewed the Annotated Agenda with the Commission.
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes Of July 19, 1993
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS: (CONTINUED)
C. League of California Cities - 1993 Annual Conference -
October 17 - 19, 1993 - Moscone Center, San Francisco
The Director the Commission of the upcoming meeting.
11. STAFF COMMENTS:
None.
12. COMMISSION COMMENTS;
A. City Council Monthly Report
Staff reviewed the report with the Commission.
B. Community Development Department Permit Monitor
Staff reviewed the report with the Commission.
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
The Commission commented on the property located at the
southeast corner of High Street. They asked who the property
owner was and why the property was not being maintained.
13. ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at No items
scheduled.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
8 -93 BY:
Celia LaFleiir, Secretary
F/V