HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2002 0826 PC REGPlanning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Paae 1
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chair Landis called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Parvin led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners DiCecco, Haller, Parvin and Vice Chair Landis
were present. Chair Otto was absent.
Staff attending the meeting included Barry Hogan, Community
Development Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Laura
Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; and Gail Rice,
Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
None.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Regular Meeting Minutes of October 23, 2000.
B. Regular Meeting Minutes of November 13, 2000.
C. Regular Meeting Minutes of December 11, 2000.
D. Adjourned Meeting Minutes of December 19, 2000.
E.
Regular Meeting
Minutes
of February
26, 2001.
F.
Regular Meeting
Minutes
of June
24,
2002.
G.
Regular Meeting
Minutes
of July
22,
2002.
MOTION: Commissioner
Haller
moved
and
Commissioner Parvin
seconded
a motion to approve the
minutes
of October 23,
2000;
November 13,
2000; December
11,
2000; December 19,
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Paae 2
2000; February 26, 2001; June 24, 2002; and July 22, 2002;
as presented.
Motion passed with a unanimous 4:0 voice vote. Chair Otto
absent.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(next Resolution PC- 2002 -428)
A. Subject: Consider Proposed Development Agreement with
Vintage Crest Senior Apartments, L.P., a California
Limited Partnership.
Staff Recommendations: 1) Open the public hearing,
accept public testimony and close the public hearing;
and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002-
recommending to the City Council approval of a
Development Agreement with Vintage Crest Senior
Apartments, L.P., a California limited partnership.
Laura Stringer presented the staff report.
The Commission questioned staff regarding:
Commissioner Haller:
• Page 15 (Section 6.10): What "referenced above" refers
to? "The Plan shall restrict the rents of all one
hundred ninety (190) units as referenced above and
shall be consistent with this Agreement and approved
by the City Council in its sole and unfettered
discretion prior to the final inspection and occupancy
approval for the first residential unit in the
Project."
Commissioner Parvin:
• Pages 15 and 16 ( Section 6.10) : Will Federal and State
law really allow the City to grant priority to
eligible Moorpark residents?
• Page 16 ( Section 6.11) : Does the agreement not protest
fees run for the life of the project?
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Paae 3
• Page 26 (reference to Exhibit B): Pagination for
exhibits needs to be cleaned up, "Exhibit B" is on the
same page as "Exhibit A" (Page 30).
Commissioner DiCecco:
• Question regarding the requirement to pull all
building permits by December 31, 2004, in order to
receive fee reductions. Concern with developer's
ability to perform within that time period, and the
effect on affordable housing in Moorpark.
• Several fees based on commercial rate, what was the
basis for the fee calculation.
• Page 19 (Section 6.16): Is it common to require pass
through for property taxes?
• Page 21 (Section 7.6): Is the $4,000 in lieu of a
traffic study going to be spent specifically on
traffic improvement for impacted intersections.
Vice Chair Landis:
• Requested update on status of USA State funding
request.
• Pages 20 and 5: Clarification of timing references
regarding "reduction in fees, based on permits pulled
by December 31, 2004" (Section 7.4) and "Project
Approvals and this Agreement" (Section 5.1).
Staff responded to the Commissions questions.
Vice Chair Landis opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.
Public testimony was received from the following:
John Newton; Moorpark, California. Mr. Newton thanked the
Commission and staff for moving this project along so
quickly.
The Commission queried Mr. Newton regarding potential
conversion and fees.
Mr. Newton commented that he and the applicant were aware
of increase in fees due to lack of performance. He further
clarified that restrictions on conversion of the project to
anything other than senior rental units was "for the life
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Page 4
of the project ". He added that the applicant recommends
approval of this Development Agreement as drafted.
Vice Chair Landis closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m.
The Commission commented that they look forward to this
project, the City's need for affordable housing, and were
satisfied that all parties had negotiated in good faith.
The Commission questioned how this project would assist in
meeting the affordable housing goals stated in the Housing
Element.
MOTION: Commission Parvin moved and Commissioner DiCecco
seconded a motion to approve staff recommendations,
adopting Resolution No. PC- 2002 -428, recommending to the
City Council approval of a Development Agreement with
Vintage Crest Senior Apartments, L.P., a California limited
partnership.
Motion carried with a unanimous 4:0 voice vote. Chair Otto
absent.
B. Subject: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -03
and Zone Change No. 2002 -03 to Amend the Land Use
Element, Land Use Map and Zoning Map, in order to: 1)
Align Land Use Designations and Zones with Lot Lines
in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4928; 2) Allow for
a Lot Line Adjustment with an Adjacent Piece of Land
for the Development of a Water Tank Site; and 3)
Clarify Policy Related to the Separation of
Residential Uses from Agricultural Uses.
Staff Recommendations: 1) Open the public hearing,
take public testimony, and close the public hearing;
and 2) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending
to the City Council approval of the proposed
amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element, Land
Use Map and Zoning Map.
Barry Hogan gave the staff presentation and discussed the
three (3) areas of change:
• Consistency between the General Plan Land Use Map,
Zoning Map and Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map
• Amendments to General Plan and Zoning Maps for
Proposed Reclaimed Water Tank Site
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Paqe 5
• Amendment to Land Use Element to Clarify Policy on
Residential /Agricultural Setbacks
The Commission questioned staff and discussed:
• commercial agriculture and elimination of the word
"surrounding" from the revised language for Policy
11.2.
• fruit - bearing trees and maintenance
• pesticides
• hillside maintenance
• pools and fencing
Staff responded to the Commission's questions.
Vice Chair Landis opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m.
There were no public speaker or written statement cards
submitted.
Vice Chair Landis closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m.
The Commission indicated satisfaction with the proposed
applications as presented and discussed, and support for
staff's recommendations.
Commissioner DiCecco moved and Commissioner Parvin seconded
a motion to approve staff recommendations, adopting
Resolution No. PC- 2002 -4291 recommending to the City
Council approval of the proposed amendments to the General
Plan Land Use Element, Land Use Map and Zoning Map with
changes as discussed regarding Policy 11.2.
Motion carried with a unanimous 4 :0 voice vote. Chair Otto
absent.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
None.
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
A. Planning Commission Meeting Agenda of September 9, 2002:
• Zoning Ordinance Entitlements (Workshop) - Verbal
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of August 26, 2002
Paae 6
• Consider Amendment to Resolution No. PC- 2002 -421
Regarding Rules of Procedure for Commission Meetings
and Related Functions and Activities.
B. Planning Commission Meeting Agenda of September 23,
2002:
• Possible cancellation
Mr. Hogan provided the Commissions with a brief summary of
future agenda items.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Commissioner Haller moved and Commissioner DCecco
seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting.
Motion passed with a unanimous 4:0 voice vote. Chair Otto
absent.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
Kipp Landis Vice
for illiam F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
cry q.1 Hog
C mmu ut y D ve opment Director
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2002 Final \020826 pcm.doc