HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2004 0217 PC REGPlanning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of February 17, 2004
Page 1
The Regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held on
February 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers; Moorpark Civic
Center; 799 Moorpark Avenue; Moorpark, California; 93021.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Pozza called the meeting to order at 7 :04 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Peskay led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners DiCecco, Landis and Peskay, Vice Chair
Lauletta and Chair Pozza were present.
Staff attending the meeting included David Bobardt,
Planning Manager; Walter Brown, Assistant City Engineer;
Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; and Gail Rice,
Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
None.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Regular Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2004.
MOTION: Commissioner DiCecco moved and Commissioner Peskay
seconded a motion that the Planning Commission Regular
Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2004, be approved. (Motion
carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.)
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(next Resolution No. 2004 -454)
A. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Zone
Change No. 2001 -02, and Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, for
1,650 Housinq Units on 3,586.3 Acres Located Generally
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04- 0217_pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of February 17, 2004
Paae 2
North of Moorpark College and State Route 118 on Land
Immediately Outside City of Moorpark Municipal
Boundaries. Applicant: North Park Village, LP (APN:
500 -0- 120 -065; 500 -0- 170 -135; 500 -0 -180 -125, -135, -
145, -155, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, -215, -225, -
235, -245, -255; 500 -0- 281 -165, -175; 500 -0 -292 -135, -
145, -195, -215, -225; 615 -0 -110 -205, -215; 615- 0 -150-
185) (Continued from January 20, 2004 Meeting)
Staff Recommendation: Continue to accept public
comments, direct staff on the suggested amendments to
the Revised Draft EIR, and continue the agenda item
with the public hearing open to the March 2, 2004
Planning Commission meeting.
David Bobardt gave the staff presentation.
The Commission questioned staff on water quality
standards and review by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board. They also questioned staff on
percolation and replacement of the lake water.
Kim Kilkenny, applicant, addressed the lakeside trail
options and provided a brief Power Point presentation.
He also submitted a drawing which showed unused oil
well surface easements on the site and provided an
updated matrix, which he stated now included the
Commission's consensus on various issues.
Staff provided clarification on staff's understanding
of the Commission's consensus on the matrix issues.
The Commission questioned Mr. Kilkenny on the various
trail options, purchasing oil well easements, and
combining various trail proposals.
Lyle Pennington, resident, spoke in support of the
proposal, and commented that the amenities wE�re beyond
comparison and the freeway improvement would offer a
much needed entry and exit to the area. He commented
on College expansion issues and the City's growth.
Lisa Leal, resident, spoke in support of the proposal,
and reiterated her previous comments on amenities and
the proposed off -ramp.
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04 0217 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of February 17, 2004
Paae 3
Lynn Shackelford, resident, spoke in support of the
proposal, and commented on the positive nature of the
proposed project and potential growth in the City.
Four (4) written statement cards were submitted, all
were in favor of the project. The statements will be
included in the record.
The Commission reviewed items 17 through 26 on the
matrix.
By consensus, the Commission concurred with staff's
recommendation on items 17, 19, 20, and 26.
The Commission provided direction to staff or
recommendations on the following items:
Item No. 18: The Commission concurred with staff's
recommendation. Staff indicated that the City
standard is for a 14 -foot wide median and this should
be corrected in the matrix.
At this point in the discussion, Commissioner Peskay
commented on the proposed interchange and mechanisms
for assuring prior to approving construction, that it
will be constructed.
Item No. 21: The Commission by consensus concurred
that early in the process, the applicant should
provide sufficient security with the City to guarantee
Collins Road Improvements by either the developer or
the City if the applicant should not move forward, and
that improvements should be completed prior to the
issuance of a grading permit. Commissioner Peskay
questioned staff on turning movements and proposed
signalization.
Item No. 22: The Commission by consensus concurred
that Item Nos. 12, 13 and 22 are all related to
densities and Affordable Housing and the issues will
require further discussion between staff and the
applicant, and may be part of Development Agreement
negotiations.
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04_0217_pcm.doc
a
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of February 17, 2004
Page 4
Item No. 23: There was lengthy discussion on the
merits of whether the school and the park site should
be switched, as staff had recommended,. The Commission
requested that staff obtain a recommendation on
location of the park sites from the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
Item No. 24: The Commission questioned whether there
should be more detail of proposed park facilities. In
response staff suggested that the Specific Plan was
intended to identify land use areas, and that details
on specific facilities were more appropriate for the
Tentative Map, Planned Development application stage.
The Commission requested that staff forward their
recommendation to the City Council that specific park
detail be included if the project will be sent to the
Moorpark voters.
Item No. 25: The Commission expressed support for an
extension of Campus Park Drive to be used for
construction and as a permanent emergency access road.
The Commission discussed tax rates on previously owned
property and new development and the mixed use and
affordable units.
The Commission requested a review of the recorded
surface mineral easements in the nature preserve, an
assessment of the economic and fiscal impacts of the
project, an operational analysis of freeway traffic
impacts, an assessment of the configuration of the
project at a regional level including east and west
circulation and the extension of Broadway currently on
the Circulation Element, and clarification of
affordable housing construction onsite or offsite.
MOTION: Vice Chair Lauletta moved and Commissioner
DiCecco seconded a motion to approve staff
recommendation.
(Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vo -e.)
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
None.
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\09 0217 pcm.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, Californ_La
Minutes of February 17, 2004
Paae 5
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
(Future agenda items are tentative and are subject to continuation.)
A. March 2, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting:
• Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -02,
General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -02, Zone Change No.
2003 -02 and Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 (Shea
Homes, Inc.)
B. March 17, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting:
• RPD 2002 -03, -04, -05, ZOA 2002 -01 (SP -2; TR 5045)
(Morrison /Fountainwood /Agoura & Pardee Construction
Company)
Dave Bobardt discussed future agenda items and stated the
correct date for the second regular March Planning
Commission Meeting is March 16, 2004.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Peskay
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting.
(Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.)
The meeting was adjourned at - "^ - -
ATTEST:
B rry I Ho n, Community Development Director
L
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04_0217_pcm.doc