Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2004 0504 PC REGPlanning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of May 4, 2004 Paae 1 The Regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held on May 4, 2004, in the City Council Chambers; Moorpark Civic Center; 799 Moorpark Avenue; Moorpark, California; 93021. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Pozza called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice Chair Lauletta led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Commissioners DiCecco, Landis and Peskay, Vice Chair Lauletta and Chair Pozza were present. Staff attending the meeting included Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; David Bobardt, Planning Manager; Walter Brown, Assistant City Engineer; Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner; and Gail Rice, Administrative Secretary. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: None. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: None. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Regular Meeting Minutes of April 6, 2004. MOTION: Commissioner Peskay moved and Vice Chair Lauletta seconded a motion that the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 6, 2004, be approved. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\09 0504 pcm.doc Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of May 4, 2004 Paae 2 B. Regular Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2004. MOTION: Vice Chair Lauletta moved and Commissioner Landis seconded a motion that the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 20, 2004, be approved as amended, Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner DiCecco seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (next Resolution No. 2004 -459) A. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02, a Request to Amend Chapter 17.74 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Relating to the Development Standards of Specific Plan No. 2; and Residential Planned Development Nos. 2002 -03, -04, and -05, for Construction of a Total of 318 Single- Family Detached Residential Units within Specific Plan No. 2, Located Approximately One -half Mile North of the Northerly Terminus of Spring Road and Three - fourths of One Mile East of Walnut Canyon Road, on the Application of Pardee Homes. (Assessor Parcel Numbers: Portions of 500 -0- 270 -07, 500 -0- 270 -19, 500 -0- 270 -20, 512- 0 -160- 54, 512 -0- 160 -55, and 512 -0- 160 -70, 500 -0- 024 -03) (Continued from April 20, 2004 Meeting) Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -03, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -04, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -05, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -02. Scott Wolfe presented the agenda report. The Commission questioned staff on the side yard setbacks for lots in Planning Area 1, minimum front setbacks in Planning Area 4, the recreational area and pool in Planning Areas 3 and 4, the area between Planning Areas 1 and 2 for recreational use, the S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04 - 0504— pcm.dcc 0 Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of May 4, 2004 Paue 3 elevation between Spring Road and Planning Area 1, consideration for plantings along Spring Road. MOTION: Commissioner DiCecco moved and Commissioner Peskay seconded a motion to approve staff recommendations and adopted Resolution No. PC -2004- 259. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Consider Recommendation to City Council on Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines (Continued from April 20, 2004 Meeting) Adopt Resolution No. PC -2004- recommending to the City Council adoption of Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines. Scott Wolfe presented the agenda report. The Commission questioned staff on clarification that the guidelines do not apply to private single- family residential homes, the elimination of Sycamore trees in the native plants list, adding a provision for shade trees in the streets, the detailed reference to specific manufacturers and allowing an equivalent for consideration, why pepper trees were discouraged, outside consultation used for establishing the guidelines, individual preference versus the guidelines, controls for quarterly or monthly review and maintenance, and that requirements for private residential properties may be established by Homeowner's Associations. MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Peskay seconded the motion to adopt Resolution No. PC- 2004 -460, as amended. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) B. Consider the Appeal of Development Director to Permit for a Professional a Decision of the Community Require a Conditional Use Office Use in the Commercial Office (C -0) Zone within 100 Feet of a Residential Zone at 724 Moorpark Avenue by Dick Wardlow, Property Owner and Appellant (APN: 512 -0- 062 -040) S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINU'I'ES \2004 Fina1\04_0504_pcm.doc Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of May 4, 2004 Paae 4 Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal and sustain the decision of the Community Development Director to require a Conditional Use Permit. Dave Bobardt presented the agenda report. Dick Wardlow, property owner, appellant, provided a history of the previous uses that had occupied the building. He stated that the Conditional Use Permit will cause a three month delay in work and a $4,400.00 fee. He stated that the project's architect reviewed the plans with city staff. He commented that denial of the appeal would cause problems for him in renting to tenants, getting loans on the property, and a new buyer would not be able to obtain financing based on the zoning. The Commission questioned Mr. Wardlow on the planned use for the property, the remodeling plans, additional square footage, the previous and current zoning, whether current use is a continuing use, timeframe when the property was acquired and information furnished to the appraiser of the property. MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner Lauletta seconded a motion to grant the appeal and directed staff to process the application as an Administrative Permit. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: (Future agenda items are tentative and are subject to rescheduling.) A. May 18, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting: • Possible Cancellation Mr. Hogan briefly discussed future agenda items, and confirmed that the May 18, 2004 meeting would be cancelled. S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04_0504_pcm.doc Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California Minutes of May 4, 2004 Paae 5 11. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Commissioner Landis moved and Commissioner DiCecco seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. (Motion carried with a unanimous 5:0 voice vote.) The meeting was adjourned at 8:23 p.m. J4 0 1� X1, I � Cott P o z air ATTEST: ar y K Hoga ommunity Development Director S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \MINUTES \2004 Fina1\04 0509 pcm.doc