Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1985 72 1211RESOLUTION NO. PC -85 -72 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MAJOR MODIFICATION TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP- MENT NO. RPD -857 ALONG WITH REVISED TRACT MAP NO. TR -4170 (Formerly TR- 3070 -5) ON APPLICATION OF U.S. CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 500- 42-85 & 500- 38 -83. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 1985, and November 20, 1985, the Moorpark Planning Commission consid- ered the application filed by U.S. Condominium requesting approval of Major Modification to recorded tract map. Modification proposed related to street alignment, street improvements, lot configuration, and to building configuration (Minor Modification approved August 13, 1985). Located north and adjacent to the intersection of Princeton Avenue and Campus Park Drive. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consider- ation of the information contained in the staff report dated November 14, 1985, has found that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF r� MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff report dated November 14, 1985, which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein are hereby approved; SECTION 2. That at is meeting of November 20, 1985, the Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions, as modified, recommending approval of Major Modification to Residential Planned Development No. RPD -857 along with revised Tract Map No. TR -4170 (Formerly TR -3070- 5); said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Chairman Douglas Holland, Vice - Chairman William LaPerch; Commissioners Dan Claffey, James A. Hartley, Jim Keenan; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: None: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11 day of December , 1985. ATTEST: it Acting Secretary Ch 'rman CONDITIONS FOR: Tract 4170 DATE: November,14, 1985 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: APPLICANT: U.S. Condominium PAGE: 1 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Maps supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map and all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance and adopted County policies apply. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County and any other governmental entity shall be met. 3. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be accep- tance by the property owner(s) of all conditions of this map. 4. All utilities shall be placed underground. S. That prior to obtaining a grading permit, the Planning Di- rector shall approve the grading plans to insure that they meet with the intent expressed by the tentative map. 6. That the interior noise levels of the dwelling unit on Lots 288, 289, and 290, 408, and 486 and appliable townhouse units shall be attenuated in conformance with the noise in- sulation standards of Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 1092 of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Noise source levels shall be based upon the 1990 traffic volumes projected along Campus Park Drive and in the Environmental Impact Report for this project. Determination as to whether the architectural design for these dwelling units complies with this condition shall be made by the Building and Safety Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. That in order to protect the public safety and prevent groundwater pollution, any abandoned wells on the property shall be destroyed in accordance with the Venutra County Well Ordinance prior to recordation. 8. That cross - connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 9. Prior to recordation, an Unconditional Availability Letter shall be obtained from County Waterworks District M1 for sewage and water service for each lot created. Said letter 60conditiona�l&vai�abilIt PLe2tergiDe a tment. Pr if said the City cannot be obtained from the CountysWaterworks y Dis- trict, the developer shall execute a Subdivision Sewer 1 CONDITIONS FOR: Tract 4170 APPLICANT: U.S. Condominium DATE: November 14, 1985 PAGE: 2 Agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. Said agree- ment will permit deferral of the unconditional guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building permit for each lot in the subdivision. n FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 10. That compliance with State Fire Marshal regulations is re- quired. 11. That prior to construction, the permittee shall submit plans to the Ventura County Fire Protection District for approval of the size and location of fire hydrants. 12. That a minimum fire flow of 1000 gallons per minute is re- quired at this location. That fire hydrants shall be installed and serviceable prior to construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the Ventura County Waterworks Manual. a) Each hydrant shall be a 6" wet barrel design, and shall have 1 - 4" and 1 - 2" outlets. b) Fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c) Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d) Fire hydrants shall be 24" on center recessed in from curb face. 13. All grass or brush surrounding any structures shall be cleared prior to framing according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 14. That address numbers shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. The num- bers shall be subject to approval by the Planning Director and the Fire Chief. 15. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard #10, in the community buildings. f� 16. That portions of this tract are in Fire Zone Four (4) and shall meet Building Code requirements for the brush zone. N CONDITIONS FOR: Tract 4170 APPLICANT: DATE: November 14, 1985 PAGE: 3 17. To break -up combustible roofing materials the spread of fire in areas other than Fire cent of the buildings shall be covered with roofing as specified in Section 3203(e) Building Code. U.S. Condominium and help reduce Zone 4, 50 per - a fire - retardant Of the Uniform 18. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 19. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 20. That an approved spark arrester shall be provided for each chimney. 21. Private driveway serving two or less homes with exterior walls greater than 150 feet from the public roadway, shall be constructed 15 feet wide and able to accommodate a 20 ton fire - fighting apparatus. 22. Access roads to open areas shall be subject to Fire Depart- ment approval. PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AGENCY CONDITIONS: 23. That prior to recordation the applicant shall pay all fees as determined by the P.A.A. pursuant to Ventura County Ordinance Code, Sections 8297 -4 et, seq., as such sections for the purpose of providing fees in lieu of land dedication for local park acquisition and /or development for the future residents of the subdivision. PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CONDITIONS (FOR PHASES 3 4 85): 24. That the following Board of Supervisors' policies shall apply: a. The Access Policy shall apply. b. The Paveout Policy shall apply. C. The Street Lighting Policy shall apply. 25. That all public roads within the tract including Campus Park Drive shall be dedicated as required, prior to recordation, and improved to include concrete curb and gutter, street lights, sidewalks, traffic signs and striping, and paving to meet existing standards in accordance with specifications of the Public Works Agency. Prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and shall post the i CONDITIONS FOR: Tract 4170 APPLICANT: U.S. Condominium DATE: November 14, 1985 PAGE: 4 bond in the amount to be approved by Public Works guarantee- ing construction of improvements. The applicable City of Moorpark standard plates are as follows: Campus Park Drive shall be constructed, east of Loyola Street, to be per Plate B -2B. West (and north) of Loyola Street, Campus Park Drive shall taper down to meet the existing road section (32 feet of paving). Developer shall also provide an 8 foot sidewalk on the east side of Campus Park Drive. Plate B -4A: Marymount Street, Loyola Street Plate B -4B: Queens Court, Luther Court, Marymount Court, Wheaton Court. 26. That prir to recordation, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the current Los Angeles Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 27. That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall dedicate on the final map to the City of Moorpark the access rights adjacent to Campus Park Drive along the entire front- age of the property except for approved access roads as delineated on the approved tentative map. 28. That prior to recordation of each phase of development, grading plans and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Public Works Agency for approval. So that building pads, street rights -of -way and streets are protected from 100 -, 50 -, and 10 -year storms, respectively, drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: quantities of water, rates of flow, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems and drainage course. 29. That prior to recordation of each phase of development, developer shall submit improvement plans for water and sewer facilities prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the Ventura County County Waterworks shall obtain Dwater cand Nsewer "Will - Serve" letters pandemshall post a bond in an amount approved by the District guaran- teeing construction of improvements. 30. That immediately prior to recordation of each phase of development, the developer shall pay Moorpark County Sanita- tion precedenttrtot receivingfsewager treatmentTecapacity, shall enter into appropriate agreement and shall obtain a "Will- CONDITIONS FOR: Tract 4170. DATE: November 14, 1985 — APPLICANT: U.S. Condominium PAGE: 5 Serve" letter from Waterworks District No. 1, agent for M.C.S.D. 31. That ornamental streetlight standards shall be installed, all energy charges paid by developer until area appears on service area tax rolls and for first year thereafter, over and above anticipated tax revenue. 32. That cut and fill slopes shall be maximum 2:1 'in accordance with the Grading Ordinance, except for minor slopes less than five (5) feet in height and appioved by the Public Works Agency and the Developer's Soils Engineer. 33. That remedial grading based on additional geotechnical investigation as required by the Public Works Agency shall be incorprated in the grading plans of each phase of development. i 34. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance shall be provided to the Public Works Agency that these easements will be adequately maintained by property onwers to safely convey storm water flows. 35. Developer shall round off all daylight lines and hillside grading to blend in with existing ground. This rounding shall only apply to areas which will not interfere with terrace drains and down drains. 36. If the grading operation occurs during the rainy season, (between October and April), an erosion control plan shall be submitted along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. STAFF ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT TO: . Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: City Council Action & RPD -8S7 Relative to Approval of TR 3070 -5 The City Council, when approving Planned Development Permit 857, also included Conditions of Approval which influenced the design of the tract. Attempting to clarify the Council's conditions related to the tract and RPD, a ,breakdown of Resolution 83 -50 is provided. Following each condition imposed by the Council on Tract 3070 -5 and RPD 857, is the developer's reaction to that condition. Where the developer has reconsidered and is requesting changes to a condition, the condition is identified and the developers posi- tion clarified. Conditions identified with * are of major con- cern. �. CONDITIONS - RESOLUTION 83 -54 1. Developer offers no objection. 2. Developer offers no objection. 3. Developer offers no objection. 4. Developer offers no objection. S. Developer has complied with condition. 6. Developer has complied with condition. 7. "That on single family dwelling units, at a minimum, entry- way fencing shall be no closer to the street than the en- trance to the dwelling unit for those units which have an adjacent downhill slope four feet or greater in height." Developer requests to add after the word height "unless said fence is no greater than 42" in height." 8. "That for all man -made slopes not entirely with individual lots, all daylight lines, corners and toes, and tops of slopes shall be rounded off to blend with natural contours. with apply th requireddrainage devices hand required tbermsaonc tops lof banks." I Developer - completed - or will be completed as part of grading procedures. *9. "That all down drainage devices shall be colored to an earth tone to blend into the hillside. Color to be iniform throughout and selected from standard colors provided from the manufac- turer of applied concrete stain." Developer - requesting that the condition of color for all drainage devices be deleted, that color would apply only to permanent downdrains. Construction of drainage devices within the earlier developed areas of this tract contain )drainage devices and structures of standard concrete color. Most drainage structure in hillside terrain are "brow" structure and are not readily visible unless an individual is searching for the structure. Additionally, some of the "drainage structures are of a temporary installation and were installed as an immediate erosion control device but to be removed later. Staff - to maintain continuity throughout the development the drainage structure should be constructed of natural colored concrete. Downdrains, Phase 4 and 5, should be stained because of visibility. 10. Developer - Has renegotiated and signed new agreement with the School District. 11. Developer - No objection. 12. Developer - No objection. 13. Developer - no objection. 14. Developer - no objection. *15. DELETE. 3 r c ;, c' r._:e. JIB ;: , •i. :_. ,9s t.. J 16. "That if 67 or more buildable lots are obtained within Phase V of the project, the applicant shall install street trees and landscaping with appropriate irrigation in the Princeton Avenue median (between Campus Park Drive and Amherst Street), to the approval of the Planning Director, provided that the City bear all operating and maintenance costs." Developer - only 64 buildable lots - request deletion of Condition. 17. Developer - complying with Condition by submitting this application. 17A. Developer - topography dictated that 17b recommendations be followed. 17b. Developer - revise tract map design incorporating recom- mendations. 18. Developer - no objection. 19. "That PD -857 shall be extended to December 31, 1987 ". *20. "That all roofing in Phase V shall be of concrete or clay tile." Developer - requests that condition be deleted. All existing units within Phase I, II, and III were constructed with asbestos shingle roof. We intend to continue with that kind of roofing. To add a tile roof to each structure would: 1) Require a redesign of the roof to support the new roof- ing material. 2) Require resubmittal of plans to City of Moorpark for additional review and fees. 3) Increase the cost of the dwelling to the purchaser by_ approximately $2S00. The increased cost will deny many qualified first time home buyers the opportunity to purchase a home. 21. Developer - no objection. 21a. Developer - agrees to comply with Condition. 21b. Developer - agrees with Condition. 21c. Developer - agrees with Condition 21d. Developer - delete Condition. Has obtained only 64 build- able lots. I I heroby c -,t;fy thnt the attached is a true nni Corr,._; .oay of the original docom:nr h:I; !s on file in this office. RESOLUTION NO. R3 sd City A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ` THE �ft�r MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING R SID NTTIAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PD IV AND V (U. S. CONDOMINIUM). -857, PHASES III, WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on July 20, august 3, .• /'t, August 17, September 7, October 5, October 19, and November 2 1 Residential Planned Development Permit No. PD -857 was r 983, ' City Council; and considered by the WHEREAS, PD -857 had been heretofore approved by the County of Ventura; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 1983s PD -857 (Phases I and II) was ratified and approved by the Moorpark City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 83 -27, and yWHEREAecord ed Pus ant to for Tentative 170-3. 070 e and 3070 -5 are presently being the County of Ventura; previously approved by NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Moor ark hereby ratifies and ap5proves Residential Planned Development Permit No. PpD the and foi10 t g conditions: rum) as conditioned by the County of Ventura subject�toV to the north iqe of Campus park Drive, within unit � 1 7 bound block walls adjacent existing front. top and sides, Maintenance of these walls shall be thder� will be stuccoed appropriate Homeowners' association. Newly constructed block responsibility ce adjacent ' Campus Park Drive within the permit boundaries shall also be stuccoed as they are constructed. 2. That the developer agrees to participate in an assessment district formed at least within the College Park area and to cause property located in PD -857 to be included therein, for the purpose of installing and maintaining improvements within the right-of -way of Campus Park Drive and /or Princeton Avenue, provided that the assessment district includes participation of all cost by all property owners in at least the College Park area in accordance with benefit. single family dwelling units in a shall manner aconsisten[ wuh completed installations of Phase I of this permit. 4. That landscape plans prepared for all man -made slopes accordance with County landscaping policy and shall be designed a shall be in enhance the visual appearance of slopes and pads atop slopes. Trees and shrubs to should l placed so as to minimize the impairment of views fromrlot and shrubs tion will be given by the City to any additional costs to homebuyers and monthly Cons idera- costs to Homeowner association fees, if additional landscaping is desired over and above County landscaping policy. 5. That landscaping on all'man -made slopes over five feet in height shall commence withir; 60 days after the completion of grading unless otherwise required by City grading ordinance. It is the intent of this condition to provide permanent landscaping on graded slopes within a completed phase and temporar unirrigated erosion control materials on slopes created where "borrow sites" y are required. 6. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, fencing plans shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Said plans shall provide for rear and sideyard fencing on all lots. Where views may be affected, fencing shall be wrought iron consistent with completed installation of Phase I of this permit. 9 7. That on single family dwelling units, at a minimun, entryway fencing shall be no closer to the street than the entrancedo the dwelling unit for those units which have an adjacent downhill slope four feet or greater in height. ww"5- 8. That for all man -made slopes within individual daylight lines, corners and toes, and tops of slopes shall be rounded off to lots, blend all with natural contours. This shall apply only where there would not be a conflict �^ with required drainage devices and required berms on tops of banks. 9. That all drainage devices shall be colored to an earth tone to blend into the hillside. Color to be uniform throughout and selected from standard colors provided from the manufacturer of applied concrete stain. ..., 10. That Phase, the developer sihall the e issuance of building permits for lots within each iL to the Unified School District; and shall be fur her requires o renegot ate facilities agreement with the appropriate school district upon the expiration of the existing agreement for the payment of school facilities fees. 11. That on banks between side yards of lots that rise uphill, all trees „ are to be 15 gallon, and one 15- gallon tree will be added to the draft landscape Plans for each bank in this category. (seeExhibit A. ) 12. That no homes will be built on lots 331, 332, 379, 380 and 381 in Phase IV and they shall be deeded. to the Homeowners Association for common use. Landscaping and irrigation shall be placed on these graded as building sites. lots and they shall not be 13. That on the slope adjacent to Campus Park Drive within the Condo - minium portion of Phase III, all trees are to be 15 gallon, and 15 to 20 15- gallon trees will be added to the slope and along the top of the slope, as shown on the draft landscaping plans. (Exhibit A. ) 14. That rear yard fencing on lots 286 -293 in Phase III and lots 306 -310 in Phase IV will have the framing portion on the inside facing the hots e. �= ? 15. That asphalt will be removed and replaced with colored stamped concrete in the median on Princeton Avenue between Campus Park Drive and Amherst Street. If a median assessment district is set up for the Campus Park area before December 31, 1987, the applicant's cost for this installation will be reimbursed. All of the above installations under this condition to be completed prior to occupancy of Phase 11I. 64 16. That if 67 or more buildable lots are obtained within Phase V of the project, the applicant shall install street trees and landscaping with appropriate irrigation in the Princeton Avenue median (between Campus Park Drive the City bear all operas the maintenance costs. iping Director, provided 17. That the approval of Phase V of this permit is subject to the condition that the permittee shall submit applications for a major modification and a new subdivision map prior to the issuance of any zone clearance within Phase V. The modification and subdivision map will be prepared considering topography, grading and dirt exchange using the following order of preference: lots 473 -482, 419-434 and lot 85rand lots 449-452 and lot-484 4844 and add 9 lots it westerly of the lower section of Marymount, with Marymount as prime access to the northernmost newl created lot, and delete Marymount between the westerly end of the cul- de-sac at Queens Court and the northerly section of the cul-de -sac on Marymount adJ'acent to the newly added lots.. This alternative shall be submitted if,by March 1, 1984 the City - indicates in writing that the northern half of Campus (' Park Drive need not be fully improved as shown on Tract TR -3070 Phase V. b. Mary- mount, lots 429-431 may beareinstated and four enew lots may y be created around the Marymount cul -de -sac at Queens Court on a one - for -one basis, to total 9 lots. This alternative shall be submi in writing that the no tted if, by March 1, 1984, the City indicates rthern half of Campus Park Drive need not be fully improved as shown on Tract TR -3070 Phase V. c. If the one -half of Campus Park Drive, the cul-de-sac on Marymount Street at Queens Court is to be omitted, Marymount is to continue to intersect Loyola Street pursuant to the original tract map, no building is to occur on lots 419 -424, 432 -434, 485, 449 -452 and lot 484. Grading is to be redesigned to *maximize natural areas. 6" 18. That all of the above references to "tracts" and "lots" refer to the lot numbers on Tentative Tract Map No. TR -3070. CD v 19. That PD -857 shall be extended to December 12, 19$ ,i/G 20. That all roofing in Phase V shall be of concrete or clay tile, 21. That a Development Agreement shall be prepared brought © before the City Council as. soon as it can be prepared in an orderl manner. Said Agreement shall include the following provisions: -3- a. That it is the intent of the City that PD -857 shall be subject to any rule, regulation, policy, ordinance or resolution relating to the public [� health or safety that maybe adopted subsequent to this Resolution id enactment to maintain consistency with the County Air Quality Mgram. D-957 be ON—empe b. That the City agree to expedite processing of t Phase V; c. That bonds and deposits on the originally recorded subdivision map for Phase V be transferred to any new map required as part of the redesign; �of the project, the applicant shall more nstall street trees with appropriate irrigation is the Princeton Avenue median (between Campus,Park Drive and Amherst treet), provided that the City bear all operating and maintenance costs. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Moorpark hereby ratifies the certification by County of Ventura of the environment document for PD -857 and further finds that the additio* the conditions described in Section 1 herein do not necessitate the preparation UT 8 SIT the conditions will not result in new sieni icanr o e SECTION 3. The Residential Planned Development Permit approved b y the County of Ventura reflects the County's governmental structure and contains references to officials, official titles, commissions and other designations which are not a part of the structure of this City's government. Whenever the permit approved by the County refers to an official, official tide or other designation, the reference shall be interpreted to mean that office, title or designation in the governmental gtructure of this City, or if there is none, any official or title holder in this City who has been specifically directed by the City Council or the City Manager to perform the functions referred to as the duties imposed. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16th day of _ November 1983. ATTEST: _. aS y 1c2� .- City C!ervr� (SEAL) - oo M0 MM (� (� _ ' PoL�o LJC�ln� `70II L "ap po a miz (805) 529 -6864 January 29, 1983 Mr. Phil Vein U. S. Condominium P. 0. Box 276 Moorpark, California 93021 CITY COUNCIL LETA YANCY - SUTTON MAYOR ALBERT PRIETO MAYOR PRO TEM ROGER BEAULIEU CLINT HARPER JERRY STRAUGHAN Residential Planned Permit No. PD -857, Phases III, IV and V Pursuant to our conversation of yesterday, I am enclosing a corrected copy of Resolution No. 83 -54, adopted by the Moorpark City Council at its meeting of November 16, 1983, approving the subject permit. The correction we discussed will be found at the top of page 4 and reflects the action of the City Council as is shown by the minutes of that meeting. Also enclosed is a copy of those minutes. If you wish to discuss this matter in any way, please call. Thank you for your gracious attitude and we hope we have not inconvenienced you in any way. Happy New Year :: DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk enclosures cc: Stan Cohen "I—,, ..+liC�■rp! *� .'A°Iiivi fl,� !4F IW4 Win ♦ �i �V�` _Giil�: �� ►` ►� �lZl�%own ►E� Gr�niiiii Mo trA G, YW `CJ �.F:'4 • � • 1 11 \II 1\ 11 11 l�� srtil' 11 II 1 I \ •`lam ��� 11 1t { 1 I1\ T"I't �le?8e + :. l. • -A Yr 30 R\ it \ \ \ \`\� lL. I;i /R RS le 3+ \\ I 3e RS Se 7,i. ; e A/ b 1 I931 1 \ 30 RS P 7 --'/- [S� / 1 • /•a \� :� 40 RS 3i •/ TRACT 4170 (3070 -5) /1 11 11