The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 1986 118 1112RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP -356 ON THE APPLICATION OF JUNE ELMORE. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 511 -07 -33 WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held before the Planning Commission on November 12, 1986 to consider the request for approval to construct an Industrial building of 9,602 square feet of warehouse; 1,000 square feet for assembly; and 5,250 square feet for office for a total of 15,852 square feet. Located on Tech Circle at Poindexter Avenue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report dated November 12, 1986, and the information contained in the Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant affect on the environment; and hereby approves the Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder; and has reached its decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff report dated November 12, 1986, which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein are hereby approved; SECTION 2. That at its meeting of November 12, 1986 the Planning Commission took to waive Consent Calendar and approve Development Plan Permit No. DP -356 subject to the recommended conditions attached herein. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote; AYES: Commissioners Rosen, Holland and LaPerch; NOES: None; ABSENT: Commissioners Keenan and Claffey. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12 day of November , 1986. Chairman ATTEST: Acting Secretary rl— r�' APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP -356 June Elmore November 12, 1986 1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot plan(s) and elevations labeled Exhibits "3" & "4" except or unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may; at his discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. 3. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County and City Authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference become conditions of this permit. 4. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 5. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 6. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 7. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval, the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of use of this permit. The remnant next to parking space No. 27 shall be incorporated into the landscape planter area and show as part of the landscape plan. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 8. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. 9. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low -water using variety. 10. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air - conditioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 11. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and rl— , shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 12. That all utilities shall be underground. 13. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 14. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Section 9.50 of Chapter 50. A sign permit is required. 15. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 16. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal.) of this permit or in the alter- native to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS DP -356 June Elmore November 12, 1986 17. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City's code Enforcement Officer. 18. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional" Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1. 19. No external ladders shall be provided on the building. 20. That the proper performance standards and conditions are, whenever necessary, imposed upon this project, or which reasonably may be expected to become, obnoxious, dangerous, offensive, or injurious to the health, safety or welfare of the public or a portion thereof, by reason of the emission of noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odor, or other harmful or annoying substances, if any. f^ DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June .Elmq�e' -`- � DATE: November 12, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City A Ry of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified '4 by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. NThe grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved g G Soils Report. N o v ? 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City aJ b 3 of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared rn 04 by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the •11 • M City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient w ro surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. 4J 0 ua in 4J The improvements shall include r.oncrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, 0 ro O street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with `n o A the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard ro 4J -4 Plates are as follows: 3 o ro +' Q) A - All driveways to be 25' wide with A 10' radius curb return per ro w O plate E 2. v •H o •4 ro .H 0 R 0 - Sidewalk shall be transitioned from 8' wide on Poindexter Avenue 10 to 5' wide at beginning of curb return on Tech Circle, per plates 0 8 U 4J C D -12 and E -5. M � Q I aC U ro - Install Handicap Ramp at intersection of Poindexter Avenue and Tech Circle, per plate -e -2 ro +J ro 0) (d R .X 4. That prior to any work being conductOd within the State or City ro ro right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit r-1 04 �4 from the appropriate Agency. w aro w vro'N 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate p+ > feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency a w to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. storm U N Sd iJ DD v va ro ro .c a (' v o ro I I /0,03' /3 96 "w.. h I X Q I O 2 ip= 27G4.B3 Q= 2954.83 R = 40.00' � :D= ?°0439 dr /'0353" �= 84°/769• 7 z/ / T = 50.26 N. B9°59 %6"e. 23.93, - R= 3'0,00' N ,a = 4B °5000 L - ".49 r= //. 77 ' N1 R= 45.00 G = 3.75 Ties' 7'c 25./3 T � 3C N. 77S. N. B9°59 %6"e. 23.93, - R= 3'0,00' N ,a = 4B °5000 L - ".49 r= //. 77 ' N1 R= 45.00 G = 3.75 Ties' r— APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP -356 June Elmore November 12, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: - All driveways to be 25' wide with a 10' radius curb return per plate E -2. - Sidewalk shall be transitioned from 8' wide on Poindexter Avenue to 5' wide at beginning of curb return on Tech Circle, per plates D -12 and E -5. - Install Handicap Ramp at intersection of Poindexter Avenue and Tech Circle, per plate E -2. 4. That prior to any work being conduct3d within the State or City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP -356 June Elmore November 12, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall 'deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue I Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. 7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water wells and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 8. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydroulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculation shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quanties of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage area and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 9. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 10. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. r� APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 COUNTY $NERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 -foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage - resistant covers. 5. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 6. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking, lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 7. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 8. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 9. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. 10. All entrances /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width with radius curb returns. 11. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly. 12. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4- inches thick or of metal construction. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore fe� DATE: November 12, 1986 COUNTY iSRERIFF''9 :DEP'ARTMENT ,CONDITIONS (cont.) 13. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 14. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the track when in the closed or locked position if applicable. 15. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 16. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in a tract or commercial development, constructed under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct occupancies. t APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE CONDITIONS 1. That a street width of 36 feet shall be provided for a two way traffic access road off -site. That a street width of 25 feet shall be provided for a two way traffic with off street parking provided on both sides on site. 2. That the applicant shall provide sufficient proof of the ability to prevent vehicle parking in "no parking" areas and that enforcement can be secured in order that access by emergency vehicles will not be obstructed. 3. That access roads shall be installed with an all- weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 4. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13'6 "). 5. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual 9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protec- tion devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2,000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -118 - 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE CONDITIONS 10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1,250 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 13. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 13. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 15. That building plans of all "11" occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 16. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 17. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall,be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 18. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. 19. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention. 20. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. `-COMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor DANNY A. WOOLARD Mayor Pro Tern JAMES A. HARTLEY Councilmember ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember THOMAS P.GENOVESE City Treasurer ifv MOORPARK ITEM NO _ 7A STAFF REPORT TO: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, November 12, 1986 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP -356 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Applicant: June Elmore 30756 Passageway Place Agoura, CA. 91301 Subject: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 15,852 square foot industrial facility on a 36,080 square foot site (0.83 acres). Location: Tech Circle south of Poindexter Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -33 General Plan/ Zoning/ I -1 Limited Industrial /M -1 Industrial Park Surroundine Pronert Zoning /Use: North: A -E /Railroad Vacant South: M -1 /Vacant East: M -1 /Self Storage West: M -1 /Unoccupied Industrial Parking: Required: 29 spaces Provided: 32 spaces Environmental: Negative Declaration Issues: 1. Aesthetics /design. 2. Traffic 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 {805 529 -6864 STAFF REPORT: PLANNING COMMISSION p. 2 11/12/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP -356 Discussion: A 15,052 square foot industrial building on an existing 36,090 square foot parcel is proposed in an existing M -1 zone. The area has been previously subdivided for this type of land use and proposed development. The applicant would be an owner user of the building and the building would not be built for speculative purposes. However the building is designed much like a spec building. The building would consist of two - stories (5,767 square feet) in a portion of the building and a single floor though most of the structure. The total height would be 22 feet. The floor area. and parking tabulation is as follows (parking figures on the plans are incorrect): Warehouse: 9,602 sq.ft., 10 spaces required Manufacturing: 1,000 sq.ft., 2 spaces required Office: 5,250 sq.ft., 17 spaces required TOTAL 15,052 29 spaces required (32 spaces provided) The onsite circulation consists of three entrances, all on Tech Circle. No access directly to Poindexter Avenue is proposed. The internal circulation work well as it provides an adequate flow- though pattern where two bays abut one another. Where a single bay exists, adequate back up space is provided at the end of the bay. The loading zone is accessible and provides sufficient manuevering space. (A remnant parking space next to space No. 27 is indicated and will be required to be incorporated into the planter area). Areawide circulation would be entirely via Poindexter Avenue to points east and west. The project would not impact the intersection along Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Moorpark Avenue, as would most of the industrial developments further south of this site. Traffic to and from the project site would be easier disbursed in this location. Due to the small size of this project, no traffic impacts are anticipated. The project site is at the intersection of Poindexter Avenue and Tech Circle. It's construction will significantly obscure the view of the "Moorpark Self Storage" facility abutting the project site to the east. Materials, colors and finishes for this building are proposed to utilize deep- ribbed split face block, medium gray in color, with bands of smooth block painted the same at the top, middle and bottom. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO DP -356 Discussion: (cont.) Windows will be of a black glazing rather than bronze as indicated on the elevations, with bronze frames. The proposed project has some staff concerns which are listed below but will not be made conditions of approval. 1. The driveway apron to the parking area at the north side of the building is approximately eight feet from the curb return. Although only five feet is required, this distance appears marginal so as to avoid inter- section conflicts. 2. The office space requires 17 parking spaces. Only 13 spaces are shown in the north parking area, nearest the office portion of the building. It would be better to balance the parking on the site. If the appropriate number of spaces were located adjacent to the office use it may preclude significant use of on- street parking. 3. The proposed building is designed to be easily divided in the future. Numerous doors face the street. If the building is not truly in need of the doors at this time, it would improve the aesthetic appearance to eliminate what appears to be unnecessary doors. 4. The location of the large doorway at the south end of the building, may encourage an illegal loading space. It's elimination would reduce a potential safety hazard. Recommended Action Make the following findings: 1. That the project is consistent with the land use designation, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. 2. That applicant has produced sufficient proof that the use will not be injurious or detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or to the property in the vicinity or the zone in which the use will be situated and that said effects can be prevented with the imposition of conditions; and that the permit is necessary for the owner of the property to make reasonable use of the property. 3. That the proper performance standards and conditions are, imposed upon the project, which reasonably may be expected to become obnoxious, dangerous, offensive or injurious to the health safety or welfare of the public or a portion thereof, by reason of the possible emission of noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odor, or other harmful or annoying substances. P epared by: u ael Y kilbin Senior Planner 4. That the integrity and character of the zone in which the use will be located, the utility and value of property in the zone and adjacent zones, and the integrity of zones in incorporated areas if the proposed use is within the sphere of interest of such incorporated area, has been preserved. 5. That the use will not be or become detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or to the general welfare. 6. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration and approved the attached Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued there- under. 7. Direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve Development Plan Permit No. DP -356 subject to the recommended conditions (or as amended by the Commission) for consideration by the Planning Commission at its next regularly scheduled meeting. ,Approve by: i Patrick J.: ichards Director of Community Development EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Negative Declaration 3. Site Plan 4. Elevation Y M ~ 7 r \W 0 a a �n � I H G4 �A x 0 � a w Y w � O$ .1 i CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant -JQME 2. Project Description I 3. Date of Checklist submittal 4. Project Location ' _ 7+} 0 j^ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or _ temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse _ impacts on air quality in the project area? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction _ of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? — c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood x waters? — d. Change in the amount of surface water in. any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any _ alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either _ through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ j. Exposure of people or property to water related _ �- hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? r- YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, _ grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of _ existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals _ including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? — c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration _ or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? — 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: d a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural / resources? — b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? — (" YES MAYBE NO 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, — pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? — ,r- c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation X systems? — — d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? — e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, _ bicyclists or pedestrians? — 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? x b. Police protection? — C. Schools? v d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE No b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources X of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements? _ 17. HUNAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public. or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL /HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- al sites? — b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known _ archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? C. Result in destruction or alteration of a known _ archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? YES MAYBE NO 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? �( b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea.h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant r effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. Case No. DP -356 Applicant: June Elmore ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY "Yes" and "Maybe" responses in the initial study are addressed as follows. 3b. The increased ground coverage which will result from this project will reduce absorption of water and increase run -off. Drainage precautions will be necessary to guard against flooding of the parking area. Compliance with Building Code requirements should abate any potential problem in these areas. Storm drains in the area are adequate to accommodate the slight increase in load. 6a. During the construction period, operation of heavy equipment and trucks will generate noise, which will be fairly loud at times. However, adherence to the provisions of the limiting hours of construction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. After completion of the project, there will be an incremental increase in the amount of traffic noise in the area, due to vehicle trips generated by the project. Noise coming from the building itself may be caused by the operation of air conditioners and other appliances. The impact on neighboring properties should be minimal. 7. Light from the project will emanate from windows, and from the parking area (primarily headlight glare). There will also be incidental outdoor lighting around entrances. None of these effects are expected to be significant. 8. The site is presently vacant, therefore any development on the site would represent a substantial change. However, the proposed development is in accordance with existing zoning and the General Plan land use designation. 9a. Operation of construction equipment will require the use of electricity and burning of fossil fuels. Water will be used for dust control, and construction materials themselves will use water, electricity, and fuels, but not significantly impacting the availability of natural resources. 13b. A demand for new parking will be generated by the proposed industrial project. However, code requirements for off - street parking will be satisfied. d. Due to the fact that new development is proposed on presently vacant land "change" in circulation is inherent. The change is on -site only, as no new streets are proposed. f. Some increase in traffic hazards is inherent with new development adding additional traffic to the area. However, no feasible mitigation measures are available other than reliance on good judgement of speed !� of travel and observance of crosswalks and posted limitations. November 12, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 12th day of . No hm , 19 86 , beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark. Avenue, Moorpark, California- 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described, NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that, based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore a Negative Declaration has been completed In compliance with State CEQA- Guidelines issued -thereunder. Entitlement: Development Plan Permit No. DP -356 Applicant: June Elmore Proposal: Requesting approval to construct an Industrial building of 9,602 square feet of warehouse; 1,000 square feet for assembly; and 5,250 square feet for office for a total of 15,852 square feet. Location: On Tech Circle at Poindexter Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: 511 -07 -33 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue,. Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529 -6864. DATED: October 27 , 19 86 Title: Administrative Secretary NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: Development Plan Permit No. DP 356 Applicants Name: June Elmune Parcel Size: 36,080 sq. ft. Assessors Parcel No.(s): 511 -07 -33 Zoning Designation: M -1 General Plan Designation: I -1 -Light Industrial Project Location: Poindexter Avenue and Tech Circle Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: Construction of a 15,852 sq. ft. industrial facility. The public review period for the draft Negative Declaration is from October 29, 1986 to November 12, 1986 I you have any questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of. the draft Negative Declaration, please call or write, Diane Eaton, Associate Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 93021, (805) 529 -6864. Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address. Prepared by Date: 10/29/86 !' giane a on AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on October 27, 1986 Monday , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION & PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON 11 -12 -86 ON THE APPLICATION OF JUNE ELMORE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT N0. DP -356 REQUESTING APPROVAL OF AN INDUSTRIAL FACILITY 15,852 E FEET. by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark r California addressed to SEE ATTACHED LIST Dated: October 27, 1986 Deputy City Clerk C:i7Y OF MODRPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCmmUNITy DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 _ NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP 356 2. Applicant; June Elmore 3. Pro sal; Construct a 15, 852 sq. tt. in us ria aci i y. 4. 5. Responsible A ncies: None II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS- An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Developerent to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the envirorinent. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY- These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Standard LA -AOC II L PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 M 2. Docment Posting period; October 29, 1986 - November 12, 1986 Prepared by: 10/29/86 (Name) (Date) Diane Eaton Approved by: (Name) (Date) I. CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION _MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION S. Responsible Agencies: _�'' II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project c'M*AV;<8uu1 not, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated ! through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Le al Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; &If,-rG13aZ, 2St IL / 113t 7? 1210 lrle Prepared by: App by: �'LI�+HbfL 1t.. �Zc.1i311.1 � /G-2y a-G (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) bG'i• ?fl 1°1PWo "EXHIBIT 2" r^ I- DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot plan(s) and elevations labeled Exhibits "3" S "4" except or unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may; at his discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. 3. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County and City Authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference become conditions of this permit. 4. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 5. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or :Limitations set forth. 6. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 7. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval, the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of use of this permit. The remnant next to parking space No. 27 shall be incorporated into the landscape planter area and show as part of the landscape plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP -356 June Elmore November 12, 1986 8. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade 16. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alter- native to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may, be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. 9. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low -water using variety. 10. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air- conditioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 11. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 12. That all utilities shall be underground. 13. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and appropriate wheel blocks or curbs in parking areas. 14. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Section 9.50 of Chapter 50. A sign permit is required. 15. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" extension of the parapet wall above the highest: point of the roof. 16. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alter- native to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may, be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS 17. That the continued maintenance of the,permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to'remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City's code Enforcement Officer. 18. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional" Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1. 19. No external ladders shall be provided on the building. 20. That the proper performance standards and conditions are, whenever necessary, imposed upon this project, or which reasonably may be expected to become, obnoxious, dangerous, offensive, or injurious to the health, safety or welfare of the public or a portion thereof, by reason of the emission of noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odor, or other harmful or annoying substances, if any. i r'" DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil-Engineer; shall obtain_a Grading permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: - All driveways to be 25' wide with a 10' radius curb return per plate E -2. - Sidewalk shall be transitioned from 8' wide on Poindexter Avenue to 5' wide at beginning of curb return on Tech Circle, per plates D -12 and E -5. - Install Handicap Ramp at intersection of Poindexter Avenue and Tech Circle, per plate E -2. 4. That prior to any work being conduct3d within the State or City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. r DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue I Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the .-time the Building Permit is issued. 7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water wells and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 8. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydroulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculation shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quanties of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage area and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 9. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 10. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 F APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 -foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage - resistant covers. 5. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 6. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from gnother moving vehicle or pedestrian. 7. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level.. 8.I Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6- inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 9. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. U 10. All entrances /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width with radius curb returns. 11. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly. !'- 12. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4- inches thick or of metal construction. V DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 COUNTYiSHERIFF':S DEFARTIENTCONDITIONS (cont.) 13. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 14. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the track when in the closed or locked position if applicable. 15. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 16. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in a tract or commercial development, constructed under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct occupancies. r" 0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE CONDITIONS I. That a street width of 36 feet shall be provided for a two way traffic access road off -site. . That a street width of 25 feet shall be provided for a two way traffic with off street parking provided on both sides on site. 2. That the applicant shall provide sufficient proof of the ability to prevent vehicle parking in "no parking" areas and that enforcement can be secured in order that access by emergency vehicles will not be obstructed. 3. That access roads shall be installed with an all - weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 4. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches (13'6 "). 5. That the access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual 9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and. fire protec- tion devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2,000 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -356 APPLICANT: June Elmore DATE: November 12, 1986 -VENTURA- COUNTY FIRE CONDITIONS 10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1,250 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared -for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to 'the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 13. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 13. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 or more, shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 15. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 16. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet 910. The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 17. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall, be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 18. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguishing system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. 19. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention. 20. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance 914. Proof of Publication In the matter of: _ f ie Sosmiaew -N& #DP- L STATE OF CAl IFORNIA. County of Ventura City of Moorpark 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the; County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not'a party to or interested in the above - entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Moorpark, County of Ventura, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Sgnerior Court of the County of Ventura, State of California, under the date of April 27. 1981. Case number SP49672, that the notice, of which the an. nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en. tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit; all in the year j9�__________ - -- certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated atMoorpark, California, thisazy d &y of_ i Signature MOCRPARKNEWS 724D Moorpark Ave P.O. Box. 775 Moorpark, CA 93021 This,space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp NOTICE Is harebv ahan that • D tblb Marko WIN be Mid bbKont� +9arufk gCionknaaslOn _ Wednesday. y. "00 � t 7133 Res, In � C4une11 CMm�. ksM Ma.. at the hour qty fooabd at 709 Moorpark Avanei u •,4 CaNlamla 070Qt for the purpaaa of eonsidaratbn- or"tM'" propoeed f>rolest halaktbebw described. NOTICE Is given, further 9, Mtl, PWWJMt to California State law. an awWatbn has been Conducted to detemdns If the propoasd prp�t could &VnMOMW dleot the es, vtronment. and tkq, be upar an W" roNmv. N has been found that a elpn1ff efNatweldd netoccur, therefore a Neyatiw dllon (tae been completed in � Nance with State COCA Oukk"ws Issued thsreun- Entitlement: Development Plan Permit No. DP358 Applicant: June Elmore Proposal: Requesting hovel to construct an Industrial twNding of 9,002 square Net Of warehouse; 1,000 equ r feat, for allsernbly;,and 5,250 square feat for office for a total of 15,852 square feet. Location: On Tech Circle at Poindexter Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: 511 -0733 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE'S If you challenge n9gthe proposed action in Court, you may be limited at the puD1i �� (described in this someone else or in written correspondence elivered to the _.Planning�t _at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or Comments ardfng the 'project, contact the Community Oerebpinam Deppaartment at the City Nall, 709 Moorpark Aveuue, Moorpark. Califomfa 93021; Phone: (805)5294004. - Dated: .October 6.1908. f: Celia La FIsur . Title: AdmiMelretive Secretary r 1y CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant 2. Project Description M I0s 3. Date of Checklist submittal i P 4. Project Location p II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or (/ overcovering of the soil? — C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of (/ any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, (/ either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion _v which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic (/ hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? v c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either _✓ locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area? _✓ 3. .WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction t� of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood (% waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in. !/ any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any v alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or' excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? L/ i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water (/ otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related (/ hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? I,-� 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (/ 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new v light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural 1� resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife (� habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (/ 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new v light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural 1� resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? YES MAYBE NO 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous _v substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, _v distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, _v or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _v b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? _v c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? v f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? I/ c. Schools? V d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? (/ 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 1� YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand on existing sources t/ of energy or require the development of new sources T of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health _ hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact _ upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- _ al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known _ archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Result in destruction or alteration of a known _ archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? MA _V _V L/ _✓ V V V v V V G/ r^ r-- C YES MAYBE NO 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into / the future.) (/ c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea.h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class 1/ I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION' should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is_adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. /— I 'OMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor DANNY A. WOOLARD Mayor Pro Tern JAMES A. HARTLEY Councilmember ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember LETA YANCY- SUTTON Councilmember THOMAS P.GENOVESE City Treasurer Hearing Date: Hearing Location: Request: Location: Requested by: General Plan Zoning: MOORPARK ITEM NO _ 71B STAFF REPORT TO: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION November 12, 1986 City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA. 93021 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Case No.: ZC -2811 Staff Contact: D. Eaton To change the zone from R -1 (13,000) Single Family Residential to CPD, General Commercial The project site is approximately 8.15 acres in size and located immediately west of Los Angeles Avenue. Everett Braun SO Moorpark Avenue Moorprak, CA. 93021 General Commercial /R -1 (13,000) Summary: Zone Change No. 2811 is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use Element. However, staff is concerned with the timing of this request. Recommendation: Find that the zone change will not have a significant effect on the environment: and recommend to the City Council for a change: in zone from Residential to Commercial Planned Development for the subject site. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Case No.: ZC -2811 Applicant: Everett Braun I. Summary of Proposed Staff Findings for Land Use /Zoning /General Plan a. Current Land Use: An existing single family dwelling exists on the site. b. Adjacent General Plan Land Use: North: C -2 /General Commercial South: CPD /Commercial Planned Development East: C -2 /General Commercial West: R -1 (13,000) Residential C. Compatibility of proposed with surrounding Land Uses: Yes d. Present Zoning: R -1 (13,000) e. Proposed Zoning: CPD Commercial Planned Development f. Adjacent Zoning: North: CPD /Commercial Planned Development South: R -1 (13,000) /Residential East: R -1 (13,000) /Residential West: R -1 (13,000) /Residential g. Compatibility of proposed project with zoning: Not applicable h. General Plan Designation: General Commercial i. Applicable Land Use Regulations: Moorpark General Plan. II. History: a. General Plan Amendment 84 -2 was approved by the City on 10/24/84 which amended the Land Use Element to General Commercial. b. Zone Change case ZC -2811 was filed on August 28, 1986. III. Project, Staff Testimony and Proposed Findings: a. Applicable Land Use Regulations: 1. General Plan. 2. The General Plan lists the following goals and policies. Goals 1. To provide for commercial facilities which respect and encourage (1) convenience to customer, (2) harmony with existing and future land uses, (3) equity to adjacent property owners, (4) use of future public transportion, (5) reduction of vehicle miles traveled. Case No.: ZC -2811 Applicnat: Everett Braun Goals (continued) ° The proposed zone change will allow for the continued expansion of goods and services within the community. 2. To concentrate business facilities in compact areas and discourage them in linear strings along major and secondary traffic arterials ° Project site with a depth of 300 sq. ft. will provide adequate acreage discount typical strip commercial. 3. To provide for shopping centers which sill provide a variety and quantity of goods and which will be in an appropriate location and have appropriate access to major roads. Subject site is located along Los Angeles Avenue which is a major roadway. Policies 1. Necessary service and retail establishment not currently located in the community should be encouraged to locate there, providing community make up or market data indicates a need. 2. To provide for a range of commercial facilities which serve the residents of the community and encourage new employment opportunities. ° Proposed zone change will facilitate the expansion of various commercial goods and services. Additional commercial activity will provide new employment opportunities within the coummunity. Existing and adjacent land use: a. To the north of the subject site, is a vacant field; east is an existing residential dwelling; west of the site an existing nursery; south is the arroyo. Natural features and infrastructure: 1. Natural features: The site is relatively flat with gentle slope to the arroyo. 2. Infrastructure a. Sanitation - the subject site is connected to our sewer system. b. Water - The project site is located within Waterworks District No. 1. Sufficient resources exists to service the site. Case No.: ZC -2811 Applicant: Everett Barun Policies C. Flood Control - Flooding problems are not associated with this site. d, Schools - If the project is approved, it will result in a net decrease of 19.11 students into the school system. e. Parks and Recreation - Fees for parks will be lost with a change from Residential to Commercial. However, there will be a comparable decrease in park service demand. f. Police and Fire - This project does not appear to create additional costs for surveillance. Existing fire protection facilities within the area are adequate to service the site. The project is not located in a high fire hazard area. g. Traffic and Circulation - The proposed change in zone will increase trips per day. However, commercial use typically provides non -peak vehicle trips. There is not expected a change of level of service on Los Angeles Avneue because of this zone change request. C. Public Comments Received. 1. No written comments have been received at the present time. TV. Zoning Compliance Section 65860 of the California Government Code states that zoning be consistent with the officially adopted General Plan of any City or County. And in the event that a Zoning Ordinance becomes inconsistent with a General Plan by reason of amendment to such a plan, or any element of such a plan, such a Zoning Ordinance shall be amended within a reasonable time so that it is consistent with the General Plan as amended. Based upon the above, the following findings would be required: a. That the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Moorpark General Plan. b. That the public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice justify the zone change. c. The effects of this zone change has considered the housing needs of the region and balanced those needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. Case No.: ZC -2811 Applicant: Everett Braun V. Environmental Impacts a. An initial study and Negative Declaration has been completed. A finding has been made that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. VI. Discussion 1. If your Commission grants a CPD zone for the subject site, it would be consistent with commercial zoned land within the vicinity. However, this request will create a spot- zoning land use designation because the parcels to both the immediate west and east of the subject site are R -1 (13,000), while commercial zone is predominate in the area. (see attached map). 2. To the east of the subject site is General Commercial on the General Plan, while the General Plan designates to the west is M -L at this time. A zone change request on the property to the east would create consistent zoning in the vicinity. 3. The applicant is not requesting a development plan at this time. Since the General Plan Amendment was approved by the City Council approximately 2 years (10/24/86), State Law states that a municipality should have consistency between the General Plan and zoning within a "reasonable time period. Therefore a zone change should occur soom, to meet State law requirements but may be postponed until consideration of a Planned Development. 4. The applicant is not requesting a Planned Development at this time; therefore, there are no conditions :imposed at this time. However, when a future commercial development is requested, the project will be conditioned as a Planned Development. Some cities have a "Conditional Zone Change" designation which would allow conditions to be imposed. However, we presently do not have such a procedure within our present Zoning Ordinance related thereto. Your Commission may want to consider a future change to our Zoning Ordinance to include a Conditional Zone Change Procedure. VII. Summary The project is located in an area determined by the General Plan as Commercial. Therefore, the zone change request is compatible with surrounding uses and zoning. VIII. Alternative a. Recommend the requested zone change to the City Council. b. Deny the zone change request. Case No.: ZC -2811 Applicant: Everett Braun VIII. Recommendation Make the following findings: 1. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration and approved the attached Negative Declaration having, been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder; and Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending approval to the City Council of Zone Change No. 2811 . Prepared by: Diane Eaton Associate Planner EXHIBITS: Approved by: ' •-1 �Patrick J. Aikhards Director O�Jcommunity Development 1. Staff Report 2. Negative Declaration 3. Location Map r- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 12th day of. November , 19 86 , beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark. Avenue, Moorpark, California- 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described, NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that, based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore a Negative 'Declaration has been completed in compliance with State CEQA• Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Zone Change Permit No. ZC -2811 Applicant: Everett C. Braun Proposal: Zone Change to conform to the General Plan Land Use Element Location: Los Angeles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 506 -0- 050 -015 & 506 -0- 050 -025 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529 -6864. DATED: October 27 , 19 86 . Title: Administrative Secretary AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on October 27. 1986 Monday , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PRF.PARATT(1N OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION & PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO BE HELD BF.FORF THE PT.ANNTNG COMMISSION ON 11 -12 -86 ON THE APPLICATION OF EVERETT C. BRAUN REDUR9TTNG APPROVAT. OF A ZONE CHANGE TO CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE LAND USE ET.FMFNT MAP_ by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark California addressed to SEE ATTACHED Dated: October 27, 1986 Deputy City Clerk Proof of Publid.ation In the matter of I /G2ly/rLC- Z8, Si ATE OF GAUFORN IA, County of Ventura City of Moorpark I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of they County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not -a party to or interested in the above - entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a' l newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Moorpark, County of Ventura, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Ventura, State of California, under the date of April 27, 1981. Case number SP49672, that the notice, of which the an nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit; all in the year J9_gjG -_ _ 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. - I Dated at ��MfooYorpark, CalflLfornia, this dvy of I Signature: MOORPARKNEWS 7240 Moorpark Ave. P.O. Box 775 Moorpark, CA 93021 This space Is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE to hereby ahem that a pwring will De held before the _ Ranh vent of the City of Moor12th nC Qelifo may. o In the • 1t Me city the of off City located at 799 Moorpark Awirfw, Mooroafti. California J 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project herelnbeiow descrlbed. NOTICE Is hereby fuf l r given, that, pursuant to California .. State law, an avat"lo h hr been conducted to determine <^ If the proposed project coWd oloofficarally of t the an• vironment, and that, based upon on kdtial review, It has : been found that a elgedfk d effect would not occur,' therefore a Negative Dockwation tee been completed 4n'. compliance with State Cl Gull"Inve Issued_thereun. der. Entitlement: Zone Change Penult No. ZC-2811 Applicant: Everett C. Braun . Proposal:, Zone Change to conform to the Oempral ;Nan Land Use Element , Location: Los Angeles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road ' Assessor's Parcel No- 5884-050.015 35060-050-025 NOTICE NOTICE .KOTICE z N you d�aI= tiro propoeW action M Cowl, you may be Ikahed to rah1no0 aMY those lbawn you or*omeone else:., ralaed at the public fearing deacr tlO tide :11041101%, or in- welt M' " respon delivered to the MIrq. Wp rt�meme at or prior to the publ�cl*. It you have any question or comments regarding ttie protect contact the Communhy DevelopmentDepmtment at the Croy Nam, 799 Avsune, rpark, Bfornta 930211: Phone: (605)529�1. Dated: October 27,198(1. NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: Zone Change Applicants Name: Everette Parcel Size: 8.15 Acres Assessors Parcel No.(s): Zoning Designation: R -1 General Plan Designation; Project Location: Los An ZC -2811 C. Braun 506 - 050 -15, 506- 050 -25 C -2 geles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: The zone change would result in conformance to the General Plan- R -1 -C -2 Commercial The public review period for the draft Negative Declaration is from October 29,1986 to November 12, 1986 I you have any questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of the draft Negative Declaration, please call or write, Diane Eaton, Associate Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 930211 (805) 529 -6864. Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address. Prepared by: Date: 10/29/86 Diane Eaton CP1Y OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEfoPmE-Mr 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 X NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATED NEGATIYF- DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; one Change ZC -2811 2. Applicant; Everette Braun 3. Pr000sal! This 7nnP rhan". 4. 5. Responsible Agencies: Cal Trans II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the envirormient. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: r These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) N/A III. PUBLIC REVIEW: L. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; Prepared by: 10/29/86 Name) (Date) Diane Eaton October 29, 1986 through November 12, 1986 Approved by: (Naffe) (Date) -_ -i_ L t-T f. isi Vol =rr 4L C14 0 z 00 N I U z O 0 0 ;00 E