Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1987 146 0803r-- RESOLUTION NO. PC-87 -146 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPLICATION OF EMBASSY PLAZA NO. 16, LTD., FOR A PARCEL MAP (LDM -11). ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 500- 39 -35, & -85. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Division 8 Planning and Development Chapter 2 - Subdivisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code, the applicant, Embassy Plaza No. 16, Inc., has requested a parcel map approval; and WHEREAS, studies and investigations were made, and staff reports and recommendations were submitted; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Article 5, of Chapter 3 to Title 7 (beginning at Section 65300) of the Government Code of the State of California ( "The Planning and Zoning Law ") the City of Moorpark has adopted a General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration found that this project would have a significant effect of the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter not to recommend approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, this Commission, upon giving the notice required by the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 4 of Title 7 of the Government Code (beginning at Section 65850), did on the 6th day of July 1987 conducted a public hearing as prescribed by law in order to consider said application for parcel map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission is unable to make all of the findings as specified in the staff report dated July 6, 1987, and in particular the Planning Commission specifically finds that the proposed use as a result of the subdivision would be inconsistent with the purposes, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code and that the proposed use would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare.. Section 2. The proposed subdivision would facilitate a project that constitutes a more intense use of the property than the uses recommended in the adopted General Plan of the City and as such, the project would be in conflict with the abutting and neighboring single- family residences and would impose significant and detrimental impacts on the adjoining residential neighborhood through excessive noise and late hours, loitering, fumes, and odors. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the availability of existing neighborhood and convenience shopping in the vicinity is adequate and the proposed project would result in a proliferation of neighborhood shopping centers in the City of Moorpark. The Commission further finds that all -night commercial uses and gasoline sale uses r^ should be confined to the Highway 118 corridor and should not be located in the middle of single - family residential neighborhoods. Section 3. The proposed subdivision and subsequent use will be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, and to the property in the vicinity in which the use is situated. Section 4. The imposition of conditions upon the requested use will not adequately or significantly mitigate the above described injurious, detrimental effects; however, in the event the Council should approve LDM -11 it is recommended the Council impose conditions described in Exhibit "A" to this resolution. Section 5. At its meeting of July 6, 1987, this commission took action to direct staff to prepare a resolution to recommend a denial of Parcel Map No. LDM -11 to the City Council; said resolution to be presented for the consent calendar portion at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Lawrason, Montgomery, Wozniak, and Chairman Holland. NOES: Commissioner Butcher. passed, approved, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of August 1987 . ATTEST: Celia La Fleur, Secretary