HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1987 157 1019RESOLUTION NO. PC -87 -157
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1066 ON THE
APPLICATION OF LEONARD LISTON, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 506 -0- 150 -140.
WHEREAS, at a duly notice public hearing held before the Planning
Commission of October 5, 1987 to consider the request to construct an automotive
service center of 9,000 square feet, and a coin operated car wash located on the
west side of Park Lane Avenue approximately 130 feet south of Los Angeles Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the
Information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fund that this project
would have a significant effect on the environment, and has reached its decision in
the matter not to approve Planned Development Permit No. 1066.
WHEREAS, a study and investigation was made, a staff report dated
October 5, 1987, and recommendations were submitted to the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark,
California, does resolve:and in particular, the Planning Commission specifically
finds that the proposed use would be inconsistent with the purposes, intent,
guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chap
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission is unable to make all of the
findings as specified in the staff report dated October 5, 1987, and in particular,
the Planning Commission specifically finds that the proposed use would be
Inconsistent with the purposes, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and
provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code and
that the proposed use would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, and welfare.
SECTION 2. The project constitutes a more intense use of the property
that the uses recommended in the adopted General Plan of the City and as such, the
project would be in conflict with the abutting church and nearby single- family
residences and would impose significant and detrimental impacts on the nearby
residential neighborhood through excessive noise and loitering.
SECTION 3. The proposed use will be detrimental to the public health,
safety, welfare, and to the property in the vicinity in which the use is situated.
SECTION 4. The imposition of conditions upon the requested use will not
adequately or significantly mitigate the above described injurious, detrimental
effects.
-1- 157101687
�. SECTION 5. That at its meeting of October 5, 1987, the Planning
Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a resolution with the attached
recommended conditions, as modified, said resolution to be presented for Consent
Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with the
foregoing direction was approved by a roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Montgomery, Wozniak, Butcher and Lawrason;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Douglas Holland.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of October, 1987.
ATTEST:
�- Celia La Fleur, Secretary
N
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
G
P trick J. R c ards, Director of
ommunity De lopment
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Planned Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held on
the 19th day of October, 1987, roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Montgomery, Butcher, Wozniak and Lawrason;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Holland.
ATTEST:
Celia La Fleur, Secretary
-2-
157101687