Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1989 207 1218r_vw RESOLUTION NO. PC -89 -207 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -88 -1A AND ZONE CHANGE NO. Z -88 -2A ON THE APPLICATION OF JOSEPH LATONSKI BE DENIED. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on December 18, 1989, the Planning Commission considered the application filed by Joseph Latunski requesting approval to amend the General Plan land use designation from Residential Rural Low (5 acre /dwelling unit) to Rural High (1 acre /dwelling unit) and to change the zoning from RE -5 acre to RE -1 acre for his 4.12 -acre property located approximately 1,800 feet north of Casey Road and 1,500 feet west of Walnut Canyon Road (Assessor's Parcel No. 500- 260 -06); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Staff Report dated November 28, 1989, and the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, at the Planning Commission's meeting of December 18, 1989, the Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing, and directed staff to prepare a Resolution for the Planning Commission's decision; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Planning Commission hereby adopts the findings contained in the Staff Report dated November 28, 1989, which report is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council deny the requested General Plan Amendment and Zone Change based on the findings contained in the Staff Report dated November 28, 1989, and based on the following reasons: The Planning Commission considers the proposal to be premature, and that the County of Ventura acted correctly in 1982 when the Board of Supervisors rezoned Mr. Latunski's property from RE -1 acre to RE -5 acre. No change in the land use designation and zoning for Mr. Latunski's 4.12 acre property should occur until the surrounding properties to the east and south are also analyzed collectively regarding the appropriateness of allowing one -acre minimum lots. Resolution No. PC -89 -207 Page 2 �\ SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission hereby requests the City Attorney be made aware of the allegations made by Mr. Latunski regarding a potential "takings" issue. SECTION 4. At the Planning Commission's meeting of December 18, 1989, the Commission took action to approve a Resolution recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment request No. GPA -88 -1A and Zone Change request No. Z -88 -2A be denied. That action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Schmidt, Lanahan, Talley, Wozniak NOES: ABSENT: Scullin PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1989. ATTEST: Celia LaFleur, Secretary /�M1 i hn Wozniak, 01airman