HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1992 260 0406t RESOLUTION NO. PC -92 -260
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING SECTIONS 8111 -8.1 AND 8111 -8.3 OF
ARTICLE 11, OF THE ZONING CODE TO CHANGE THE
TIME PERIOD FOR APPEALS
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 6, 1992,
the Moorpark Planning Commission considered a proposed amendment to
Sections 8111 -8.1 and 8111 -8.3, Article 11, Division 8, Chapter 1
(Zoning Code) of the Moorpark Municipal Code to revise the appeal
time period for appeals to City decision - making authorities from
ten (10 ) calendar days to fifteen (15 ) calendar days after the
decision being appealed is rendered; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and
consideration of the information contained in the staff report
dated March 27, 1992, concurs that the proposed Zoning Code
amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and
is exempt from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 6, 1992, the Planning
�.- Commission considered said proposed Zoning Code amendment at a
public hearing and reached its decision;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission concurs
that the project is exempt based on Section 15061(b)(3) of the
State CEQA Guidelines, and recommends that a Notice of Exemption be
filed.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that adoption
of the proposed Zoning Code amendment, would not result in an
inconsistency with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council adopt an ordinance amending Sections 8111 -8.1 and
8111 -8.3 of Article 11 of the Zoning Code as follows (new language
is shown by highlighting and proposed deletions are shown by
strikeout):
r
Resolution No. PC -92 -260
Page 2
Sec. 8111 -8.1 - General - An application for an appeal
concerning any order, requirement, permit, or decision
made in the administration of this Cha ter ma be filed
by an aggrieved party within � ? calendar
days after the alleged decision -ma. n error, or on the
following work day if the teeth day falls on a
weekend or holiday. Included wit in t is Section are
appeals of the Planning Director's refusal to accept or
process an application until the applicant paid all
outstanding fees and charges in accordance with Sections
8111 -3.1, 8111 -3.9 and 8220. Decisions made regarding
enforcement reports, which are not a part of this
Chapter, are not appealable. In hearing and deciding
such an appeal of the Planning Director's refusal, the
Planning Commission shall consider the correctness of the
amount of the outstanding debt or charge and whether the
debt or charge is owed by the appellant, if such issues
are raised by the appellant.
Sec. 8111 -8.3 - Appeal Period - The appeal period for
a eaWM o City decision - making authorities shall end tee
calendar days after the decision being
appea is re ndered pursuant to Section 8111 -5, or on
the following workday if the teeth day falls on
a weekend or holiday.
The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners May, Miller, Torres, Brodsky, and
Chairman Wexner
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
Chairman:
ATTEST:
i Celia La Fleur
Secretary