HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1993 277 0621RESOLUTION NO. PC -93 -278
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING RECOMMENDATION
TO THE CITY COUNCIL PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED
CHANGES TO THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 8111-
8.1 - APPEALS.
Whereas, on February 20 1991, the City Council rescinded the previous Zoning
Ordinance as well as Ordinance Nos. 74 (Parking/Setbacks), 76 (Maximum Density), 113
(Signs), 83 (Produce Stands), 112 (Day Care Facilities), 121 (1,000 foot notification), and
130 (RPD Zones) in their entirety; and
Whereas, the Council adopted the then current County Ordinance with several
modifications; and
Whereas, in using the Ordinance, staff has noted that there has been a need to make
several minor modifications in order to clarify certain sections of the Ordinance and to
better fit the needs of the City; and
Whereas, Section 8115 -1.1. a of Article 15 of Division 8, Chapter 1 of the Municipal
Code provides that the City Council may initiate proceedings to consider amendments to
the Zoning Code by the adoption of a resolution of intention requesting the Planning
Commission to set the matter for study, public hearing, and recommendation within a
reasonable time; and
Whereas, on May 5, 1993, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to
study, set a public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City Council pertaining
to Section 8111 -8 et. seq. of the Zoning Ordinance; and
Whereas, at a duly noticed hearing on June 21, 1993, the Planning Commission held
a public hearing on this matter; and
Whereas, the Planning Commission determined that the modifications to the City's
Zoning Ordinance is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to
Section 15061 (b) (3) in that the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance does not
have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPAIM CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. PC -93 -278
Page 2
SECTION 1. On June 21, 1993, the Planing Commission studied, held a public
hearing, and recommended the City Council make the attached modifications to the City's
Zoning Ordinance in order to clarify certain sections of the Ordinance and to better fit the
needs of the City.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council for
the City of Moorpark:
a. That the modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance is categorically exempt
pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) in that
the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance does not have the
potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
b. The City Council make modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance as found
in Section 3 as recommended by the Planning Commission in order to clarify
certain sections of the Ordinance and to better fit the needs of the City.
SECTION 3. Sec. 8111 -8.1 - General - An application for an appeal concerning any
order, requirement, permit, or decision made in the administration of this Chapter may be
filed by an aggrieved party within sixteen (16) calendar days after the alleged decision -
making error, or on the following work day if the sixteenth day falls on a weekend or
holiday. Approval of a Zone Clearance or other ministerial approvals are not appealable
other than by the applicant of the Ministerial Approval. Included within this Section are
appeals of the Planning Director's refusal to accept or process an application until the
applicant paid all outstanding fees and charges in accordance with Sections 8111 -3.1,
8111 -3.9 and 8220. Decisions made regarding enforcement reports, which are not a part
of this Chapter, are not appealable. In hearing and deciding such an appeal of the
Planning Director's refusal, the Planning Commission shall consider the correctness of the
amount of the outstanding debt or charge and whether the debt or charge is owed by the
appellant, if such issues are raised by the appellant.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 1993.
AYES: Wesner, Torres, Brodsky, Miller and May
NOES: None.
Chairman:
ATTEST: ichael esner. Jr.
Celia LaFleur, Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS
COUNTY OF VENTURA )
I, Celia LaFleur, do hereby certify that I am the secretary of the Planning Commission of
the City of Moorpark, California and that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted on _
June 21 1993 by the following vote:
Ayes: Wesner, Tones, Brodsky, Miller and May
Noes:
ATTEST:
c 1 Q
Celia LaFleur, Secretary
r^.