Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 1997 345 1013RESOLUTION NO. PC -97 -345 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. PC -97 -342, AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97 -1, ZONE CHANGE NO. 97 -51 AND THE MOORPARK DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 95 -1 WHEREAS, public notice having been given as required by law, the Planning Commission of a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 5, and the Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan No. and subsequently continued the public hearing September 8, September 16, 1997, and October ] in time, form, and manner the City of Moorpark held 97 -1, Zone Change No. 97- 95-1, on August 11, 1997, to August 25, August 28, 3. 2003; and WHEREAS, the Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan Project is more specifically described as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 97 -1 - Amend the General Plan Land Use Element to revise Section 5.2, Specific Plan Designation, to include a description of the Downtown Specific Plan and to revise Exhibit No. 3, Land Use Plan (City Area), to identify the Downtown Specific Plan area; and amend the General Plan Circulation Element Figure No. 3, Bikeway Element, to reflect the planned bikeway linkages that would be consistent with recommended revisions to Specific Plan Figure No. 15, to facilitate bikeway access to the Downtown, including a Class II bikeway on Gabbert Road from Los Angeles Avenue to Poindexter Avenue and along the entire length of Poindexter Avenue, a Class II bikeway along Moorpark Avenue from Poindexter Avenue to High Street, a Class II bikeway along High Street and then continuing east along Los Angeles Avenue to Princeton Avenue, and a Class II bikeway along Spring Road from Los Angeles Avenue /New Los Angeles Avenue and continuing north of High Street; Zone Change No. 95 -3 - Adopt an ordinance amending Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code to establish zone districts and controlling development standards for the Downtown Specific Plan site, as identified in Section 2.0 of the Specific Plan and except as revised by the recommendations included in Section 5 of this resolution, and to amend the City Zoning Map to identify the Downtown Specific Plan area; Downtown Specific Plan No. 95 -1 - Adopt the Downtown Specific Plan in compliance with California Government Code Section 65450 et. seq. and Implementation Measure No. 22 of the General Plan Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, at its public hearings on the Project, the Planning Commission took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hearing, and reached a decision on the recommendations for the General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Zone Change components of the Resolution No. PC- 1997 -345 Page 2 Downtown Specific Plan Project on August 28, 1997, and adopted Resolution No. PC -97 -342; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued its discussion on the General Plan Circulation Element Amendment and Downtown Specific Plan design and landscape guidelines and on October 13, 1997, reached a decision, and directed staff to prepare a revised resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the Project information presented to the Planning Commission, including but not limited to, the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, Draft Specific Plan, staff reports, Downtown Citizens Advisory Committee Report, and staff and public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Downtown Specific Plan Project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Moorpark, as lead agency. 2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Downtown Specific Plan Project has been completed in compliance with CEQA (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California) and the City's CEQA Procedures. 3. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prior to making any recommendation decision for the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Project. 4. Based on the mitigation measures that are proposed, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. General Plan Amendment Finding The approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97 -1 is consistent with the City's General Plan goals and policies. Zone Change Finding The approval of Zone Change No. 97 -5 is consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97- 1. Specific Plan Findings 1. The proposed Specific Plan, with incorporation of recommended revisions, is consistent with the requirements of California Government Code Section 65450 et. seq. Resolution No. PC- 1997 -345 Page 3 2. The proposed Specific Plan, with incorporation of recommended revisions and imposition of mitigation measures, is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 97 -1. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97 -1, to revise the General Plan Land Use Element Section 5.2, Specific Plan Designation, to include a description of the Downtown Specific Plan and to revise Exhibit No. 3, Land Use Plan (City Area), to identify the Downtown Specific Plan area; and amend the General Plan Circulation Element Figure No. 3, Bikeway Element, to reflect the planned bikeway linkages that would be consistent with recommended revisions to Specific Plan Figure No. 15, to facilitate bikeway access to the Downtown, including a Class II bikeway on Gabbert Road from Los Angeles Avenue to Poindexter Avenue and along the entire length of Poindexter Avenue, a Class II bikeway along Moorpark Avenue from Poindexter Avenue to High Street, a Class II bikeway along High Street and then continuing east along Los Angeles Avenue to Princeton Avenue, and a Class II bikeway along Spring Road from Los Angeles Avenue /New Los Angeles Avenue and continuing north of High Street (reference Attachment 1). SECTION 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of an ordinance amending Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code to establish zone districts and controlling development standards for the Downtown Specific Plan site, as identified in Section 2.0 of the Specific Plan and except as revised by the recommendations included in Section 5 of this resolution, and to amend the City Zoning Map to identify the Downtown Specific Plan area. SECTION 5. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 95 -1), subject to incorporation of the following list of revisions into the Specific Plan document: Page 22, Section 1.51, General Plan Consistency, Housing Element - Delete incorrect Land Use Element reference for the Housing Element consistency section. Page 23, Section 1.5.2, Consistency with City Zoning Code, paragraph 2, line 4 - Revise Figure 9 reference to Figure 6. Page 26, Section 2.1.1 - Add discussion to clarify that the General Plan Land Use Designation on Exhibit 3 of the Land Use Element will be Downtown Specific Plan and that Section 5.1, Land Use Classifications, of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan provides reference for the descriptions of land use classifications shown on the Specific Plan Land Use Map. Since the Old Town Commercial land use classification is not included in the current Land Use Element, definition of the Old Town Commercial land use classification is required in Section 2.1.1 of the Specific Plan. A discussion of the relationship of the Downtown Specific Plan to the Resolution No. PC -1997 -345 Page 4 General Plan Land Use Element should also be included in Section 2.1.1. Page 26, Section 2.1.1.A, Special Commercial and Industrial Zones, line 4 - Delete the last word, "the ", in line 4. Also delete reference to the expanded use list for the Neighborhood Commercial (C -1) Zone and the permitted use list for the Industrial Park (M -1) Zone. (Explanation: The Table 4 list of permitted uses for the C -1 Zone and all of Table 5, M -1 list of permitted uses, are recommended for deletion, because the Planning Commission is studying an amendment to Title 17, Zoning, that includes proposed revisions to the C -1 Zone and M -1 Zone list of permitted uses.) Page 26, Section 2.1.1.B, Residential and Office Zones - Delete Charles Street Office Overlay District reference. (Explanation: Planning Commission recommends maintaining Charles Street as a single - family residential neighborhood.) Pages 27 and 28, Table 4, Permitted Uses for Old Town Commercial (OTC) Zone - Incorporate revisions to table, as shown on Attachment 2. Page 30, Section 2.1.1.F, Secondary Planning Area - Revise Figure 9 reference in line 2 to Figure 6. Also revise text in paragraph 2 to delete reference to Light Industrial /Industrial Park (M -1) land use and Table 5. Pages 31 and 32, Table 5 - Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation that the property east of Spring Road and south of the railroad tracks be zoned as Old Town Commercial (OTC) versus Industrial Park (M -1), Table 5 should be deleted, any text reference should also be deleted, and all subsequent tables should be renumbered. (Explanation: Table 5 consists of a restricted list of permitted uses for the M -1 Zone, and that table was considered not needed in the Specific Plan if the area east of Spring Road is zoned OTC.) Page 33, Figure 6, Moorpark Secondary Planning Area Zoning - Revise the title to also reference land use designations, and show planned land use designations. Page 35, Figure 7, Specific Plan Land Use Map - Revise proposed land uses consistent with Attachment 3 to this resolution. Page 36, Figure 8, Specific Plan Zoning Map - Revise proposed zoning consistent with Attachment 4 to this resolution. Page 37, Figure 9, Charles Street Professional Office Overlay District - Delete this figure based on recommendation to retain existing R -1 Zone, and renumber subsequent figures. Pages 41 -116, Section 2.2, Development Standards and Guidelines for Specific Plan Zones - The heading for each described zone district must be consistent to include the full title and abbreviation, such as change "Medium Density Residential Zone: R -1" to Single Family Residential (R -1), consistent with Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Delete references to land use designations, which should not be described in Section 2.2. For Section 2.2, Design Guidelines, for all zones identified in the Downtown Specific Plan, delete Spanish Mission and Pueblo architecture references and revise Resolution No. PC- 1997 -345 Page 5 all illustrations and photographs to eliminate examples of these types of architecture and design features. Architectural styles to be encouraged include Victorian, Western, Agrarian, Early American Commercial, Eastlake, Eastern Stick, and Spanish Colonial. An eclectic mix is preferred. Page 41, Section 2.2.1.A.3, R -1 Zone Building Setbacks - Revise text to reference Section 17.24.060.A of Title 17 of the Moorpark Municipal Code for allowed intrusions into required setbacks, including setback requirements for detached accessory structures, and Section 17.24.070 for other miscellaneous setback requirements. Page 41, Section 2.2.1.A.4, R -1 Zone Height - Revise text to identify that the maximum height of an accessory structure is 15 feet and that the maximum height of a patio cover and second story deck, not including railing height, shall be 12 feet. Section 17.24.080 of Title 17 should be referenced for exceptions to height limits. Page 49, Section 2.2.1.C, R -1 reference to Suggested Plant include the Suggested Plant 2.2.1.C.2 or in the Appendices. Zone Landscape Guidelines, revise Palette (currently Table 6), and Palette Table following Section Page 51, Section 2.2.2, High to Very High Density Residential Zone, RPD - The discussion on this page should be rewritten to be consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendations for properties to be rezoned to RPD, and the allowed density range, consistent with Attachment 4 to this resolution. Page 60, Section 2.2.2.C, RPD Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Page 62, Section 2.2.3.A.1, Office Zone - C -0, Site Development Standards, Land Use and Permitted Uses - The discussion incorrectly identifies that rezoning from C -1 to C -0 will result in a number of existing auto retail /service uses along Moorpark Avenue becoming legal non - conforming uses with the establishment of the C -0 Zone designation. Repair and reconditioning services and automobile body work and painting uses are not shown as permitted uses for the C -1 Zone in Table 17.20.060, Permitted Uses in Commercial and Industrial Zones, in the current Zoning Code. The text should be revised to clarify that automobile repair uses are already non - conforming. Pages 69 to 71, Section 2.2.3.D, Office Zone - CO, Charles Street Professional Office Overlay District - This section should be deleted based on Planning Commission's recommendation to retain existing R -1 Zone. Page 72, Section 2.2.4.A, OTC Zone, Site Development Standards - Language should be added to encourage the use of paseos. Page 72, Section 2.2.4.A.2, OTC Zone Building Setbacks - If the property east of Spring Road and south of the railroad tracks is zoned OTC, the setback discussion should be revised to clarify that the landscaped setback requirements, for that area, would be consistent with Table 17.24.020.B of Title 17 (which requires a 30- foot landscaped setback adjacent to arterials and a 20 -foot landscaped setback for two -lane local and rural collectors). Resolution No. PC -1997 -345 Page 6 Page 74, Section 2.2.4.A.5.g, Old Town Commercial, Mixed Use Development - Second sentence has an editorial error and should read: "Access for parking and driveways shall be taken from adjoining alleys or alternative streets when available." Page 85, Section 2.2.4.B.9, OTC Zone Building Materials, Roofs - Delete standing seam metal roof and add corrugated metal. Page 85, Section 2.2.4.B.9, OTC Zone Building Materials, Building Walls - Delete split -faced block and add stone or brick wainscoting. Page 88, Section 2.2.4.C, OTC Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Page 89, Section 2.2.4.C.3, Plant Palette - Delete this section, because it mandates adherence to the plant palette table. Pages 89 and 90, Table 6, Downtown Specific Plan Suggested Plant Palette - Relocate table per previous recommendation. A note should be added to the table that additional plant species can be substituted for the species listed, if such species are consistent with the architectural themes encouraged in the Downtown Specific Plan area and will not result in damage to infrastructure or a maintenance problem for the public streets and sidewalk areas. Page 91, Section 2.2.5.A.1, Neighborhood Commercial (C -1) - Revise reference to Table 4 list of permitted uses to reference Table 17.20.060 of Title 17. (Explanation: Planning Commission has recommended that the C -1 Zone list of permitted uses on Table 4 be deleted.) Page 95, Section 2.2.5.C, C -1 Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Page 97, Section 2.2.6, Commercial Planned Development (CPD) - Revise front setback requirement from "None" to be consistent with Table 17.24.020.B of Title 17 (which requires a 30 -foot landscaped setback adjacent to arterials and a 20 -foot landscaped setback for two -lane local and rural collectors). Page 98, Section 2.2.6.C, CPD Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Page 99, Section 2.2.7, Institutional Zone - Revise front setback requirement from "None" to 20 feet of landscaping along Moorpark Avenue. Page 105, Section 2.2.4.B.4, Institutional Zone Design Guidelines, Building Materials, Walls - Delete split -faced block and add stone or brick wainscoting. Page 108, Section 2.2.7.C, Institutional Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Page 109, Section 2.2.8.A.1, Industrial Park /Light Industrial (M -1), Site Development Standards, Land Use - Revise the discussion to also reference the existing industrial development in the secondary planning area and to delete reference to Table 5. Section 2.2.8.A.2, Building Setbacks, and revise the front setback requirement from "None" to be consistent with Table 17.24.020.B of Title 17 (which Resolution No. PC- 1997 -345 Page 7 requires a 30 -foot landscaped setback adjacent to arterials and a 20 -foot landscaped setback for two -lane local and rural collectors). Page 113, Section 2.2.8.B.4, M -1 Zone Design Guidelines, Building Materials, Walls - Delete split -faced block and add stone or brick wainscoting. Page 116, Section 2.2.8.C, M -1 Zone Landscape Guidelines - Correct reference to location of Suggested Plant Palette. Following Page 130, Figures 11 and 12, High Street Vision Plan Sheets A and B - Revise plan to delete raised, landscaped median. Page 134, Figure 15, Public Pathways and Plazas - Revise Figure 15 to show a Class II bikeway along Poindexter Avenue, a Class II bikeway along Moorpark Avenue from Poindexter Avenue to High Street, a Class II bikeway along High Street and then continuing east along Los Angeles Avenue, and a Class II bikeway along all of Spring Road including continuing north of Charles Street; and also revise Figure 15 to delete the Class II bikeway shown on Charles Street and change the Class II bikeway to a Class III on Moorpark Avenue beginning at High Street and continuing north to the Specific Plan boundary. (Explanation: The Planning Commission recommends that Class II bikeways be provided to facilitate access to the Downtown area of the City.) Page 135, Section 3.3.8, Medians - Revise discussion to delete proposal for a raised and planted median on High Street, and reference other potential pedestrian friendly improvements such as are discussed in Section 1.4.1 on Page 138. The second sentence of Section 3.3.8 should be revised to clarify that the construction of medians on Moorpark Avenue (State Route 23) may not be approved by Caltrans, due to the state highway designation; however, a median on Moorpark Avenue should be considered as a long -term objective if a State Route 23 bypass is constructed and the City assumes responsibility for Moorpark Avenue. Page 138, Section 3.4.1, Traffic Calming, second paragraph - Revise reference to a High Street median. Revise stop sign recommendation for the High Street and Bard Street intersection to a pedestrian activated stop light. Page 139, Figure 17, High Street Section - Revise the street section to delete the raised, landscaped median. Page 140, Section 3.4.4, Closure of Magnolia Street - Add clarification language that the Vision Plan showing the closure of Magnolia Street is intended to help guide future development, but in no way is intended as a mandatory configuration for implementation. Page 141, Section 3.5, Pedestrian /Bicycle Circulation - Revise planned bikeway system discussion to be consistent with Attachment 1 to this resolution. Page 142, Section 3.5.1, Bicycle Racks and Bench /Rest Stops - Revise the last sentence due to missing text pertaining to where bicycle racks can be located. Resolution No. PC- 1997 -345 Page 8 Page 171, Section 5.2.1.E, Program 1 - Revise reference to High Street median. Page 176, Table 13 - Revise High Street cost estimates pertaining to raised median construction. SECTION 6. The Planning Commission hereby rescinds Resolution No. PC -97 -342, which is superseded by this resolution incorporating all recommendations of the Commission on General Plan Amendment No. 97 -1, Zone Change No. 97 -5, and the Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan No. 95 -1. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Millhouse, Miller, and Lowenberg, and Chair Acosta NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Norcross PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997. Ernes costar, Chair—, By: Kipp A. Landis, Chair''---- - ATTEST: Ba ry Hoga C mmu ' y Dev to ment Director Attachments: 1. Revised Circulation Element Figure 3 2. Revised Specific Plan Table 4 3. Revised Specific Plan Figure 7 4. Revised Specific Plan Figure 8 � + 1 1 � 1 I i i i ATTACHMENT 1 TO FILLMORF ............. C STR17 ................. — — — _ — .•� TO REGIONAL SARI( �. //• �. 1 P■1 /'� � rr + ■ ■� Z\ ■ ■ ■ � , ■ `*£A M ►US PARK as �� /• e- emu ■���Tr3��L�y ■rrr ■■ ■rrr ■■ % 3j at \'1 SR 1111 it�Al y�l.t�Y fT21 :l lV,�t of, ' _ L rarlFI FS kv-,�Ums ; dw 1 r'+ z ■ — ■ 1 • 'pill P`7..� 11 ^' 1 s._.i•�.i +ter �v o s,5 �? y � •�� •": � '� � � ■ ���' " s `% __= ..fin �� i N � 41P tj 0o.� •ir■■ w N •ar�rr + ++ i w•�. S 1.—.—.—.—.—.—.— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— .— . —. —. —. —. 0 M •rip tim 111111111111111 MSS I BIKEWAY (BIKE PATH) - A radlity designed for exclusive use by bicycles and physically separated from vehicular traffic by a barrier. grade separation or open space. Cross -flows by vehicles and pedestrians allowed but minimaed Name ■ MSS 11 BIKEWAY (BIDE LANE) - A paved are, o1 a roadway designated for preferential use of bicycles. Pavement markings and stgnage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway CLASS III BIKEWAY (BIKE ROUTE) - A conventional street -here bike routes are indicated by sign only. there are no special pavement walkways and bicycle traffic shares the roadway with motorized traffic. OnI% Class III facilities which connect the Moorpark sphere with the regional bikeway system are identified to the btkcway network. Roadways which are not designated with a Class 11 bikeway, but which serve as connections herween Class II facilities or the regional btkcway system should be constdcred as Class III bikeways, CITY LIMrT BOUNDARY 22 013'%o : Sao rrr ■weven,■■+ +r +. TIFRRA SO* 'So rrr■■■ ■r■rr FIGURE 3 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT BIKEWAY ELEMENT May 13. 1992 ■ CLASS II BIKEWAY (BIKE LANE) - A paved are.^ of roadway designated for preferential use o( bicycles, Pavement markings and stgnage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway (New Class II Bikeways, upgraded from Class III Bikeways) i i i 013'%o : Sao rrr ■weven,■■+ +r +. TIFRRA SO* 'So rrr■■■ ■r■rr FIGURE 3 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT BIKEWAY ELEMENT May 13. 1992 ■ CLASS II BIKEWAY (BIKE LANE) - A paved are.^ of roadway designated for preferential use o( bicycles, Pavement markings and stgnage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway (New Class II Bikeways, upgraded from Class III Bikeways) ATTACHMENT 2 5ro0 *,Downtown Specific plan Per, t��d I�lscs Ta 'town CV"%~1rc4a (OTC) FOR SYMBOL KEY Add eC1 r n , n Ta {► .► Temporary use permit _ ♦ Permitted by zone clearance Planning Commiss ion -approved planned development permit p City Council-approved planned development permit Plannina Commission-approved conditional use permit _ ■ City Council- Conditional Use Permit -- A1co1�o��C Q�vcrrcicc��c Q)c� T 0$4GL.A"ra USE LIST 90 o +I, * r O-! GO n0 a !� OTC Old Town Commercial Amusement and recreational facilities see definitions in Chapter 17.08 Art galleries, museums, and botanical gardens Automobile repair, including component repair Automobile service stations Banks and related financial offices and institutions Barber, hairs lists manicurists Tanning centers Bars, taverns, and nightclubs Care facilities: For9 or more persons Da Churches, synagogues, and other buildings used for religious worship Club proiects, temporary outdoor Clubhouses With alcoholic beverages Communications facilities Radio and television broadcasting sietism 5-t Crop production Dog and cat grooming Dressmaking and tailor shops Dwelling for su erindendent or owner Dwelling, caretaker Education and training Sec Sakco 5 Festivals and simila ven s e s e c o Government buildings, excluding correctional institutions ■ Fire stations Grading in c0n'Nnct10n Health club / rrinesium see definitions Health services such as professional offices and outpatient clinics Hotels, motels and —a r+ wok inn Kennels animal hospitals, boarding and grooming - small animals Laundry service laundromats Laundy service (light) p Libraries and information center M L_e5S tin 5 Ovp cubic ya,Yd,s mo,-� fir, Sono cu6is 4J4rj, p Land Vse and Zoning 27 Rio M10 nIA�r_,e44n : —it rk(Downtown Spec :�ic plan Table 4 (continued) air of hoto rabic and optical goods ,� f►o� Manufactudng and re Martial arts and dance studios Motion picture and TV production, and related activities and structures Temporary maximum 47 days in an 180-day period) Offices: business, professional, and administrative, except health and veterinary Optical Goods Organizations rofessional religious, political, labor, trade, youth, etc. Parks — u b Parkin lots ■ Public utility facilities IVD 1117) Offices only Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only Photocopy/quick printers Ob Photofinishing 1 -hour photo) Produce stands retail Repair of personal goods such as jewel shoes and saddlery Restaurants cafes and cafeterias es�a�..ror-� a Ca�e,5 oLA +-!, a a-�r n 0.. Retail trade s O re o I ' . e Lumber and building materials sale aids , ko y o Schools: Elementary and secondary nonboardin only) Schools: Professional vocational, art craft and self-improvement Storage of building materials, tem ra i wct� on Uses and structures, accessory Outdoor sales and services tem ra see definitions in Chapter 17.08 Title 17 Re air of products retailed Vaccination clinics temporary, for et animals A , Veterinary clinics, et animals only 0 Water reduction, storage, and distribution facilities: private purveyors 0-,.7Edov,- Sale-S aYca1- (DL.A�1010 T- S.A.1 C to CX-rdeCL +W-Prn )CIO r-cm r j Land Vse and Zoning 28 s ATTACHMENT 3 At� et r., - ion R '°1 C--2. mH Park erera� l l N Downtown Specific plan Not to Scale I Legend El Medium Density Residential (4 -6 du) High to Very High Density Residential (7 -15 du) Office A ad vh r w h Res ;,6m � Old Town Commercial . Neighborhood Commercial "' �-2O du ® General Commercial ® Light Industrial ® Public Institutional ■ Parks �esw Specific Plan Boundary Specific Plan Land Use Map Figure 7 Land Vse and Zoning 35 El (� L� k Flory School oil P-1 Los Angeles Avenue l l N Downtown Specific plan Not to Scale I Legend El Medium Density Residential (4 -6 du) High to Very High Density Residential (7 -15 du) Office A ad vh r w h Res ;,6m � Old Town Commercial . Neighborhood Commercial "' �-2O du ® General Commercial ® Light Industrial ® Public Institutional ■ Parks �esw Specific Plan Boundary Specific Plan Land Use Map Figure 7 Land Vse and Zoning 35 T epee &4, %,J. - 1 t i& • h C -Z ;O.r m H Pew k ATTACHMENT 4 RPD- 7 -14u ** l_ -- . ..,� Los Angeles Avenue �� R• � JKoorpask(Downtown �,. R -1 �— RPD -V64m4o* 24 tA RPD -15u 81�11�u Not to Scale PT Legend E] (R - 1) Single Family Residential ® (RPD) Residential Planned Development, 7 -14 units/acre* ® (C - 0) Office ® (C - 1) Neighborhood Commercial . (C - OT) Old Town Commercial ® (CPD) Commercial Planned Development ® (1) Institutional ® (M - 1) Industrial Park Specific Plan Boundary * See Charles Street Office Overlay District ** Density bonus of up to 14du allowed with lot consolidation and replacement structures Specific Plan Zoning Map Figure 8 Land Vse and Zoning 36