Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 2001 412 0827RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2001 -412
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE
ADOPTION OF THE REVISION TO THE HOUSING
ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearings /workshops were
conducted on November 13 and 27, 2000, June 25 and August 27,
2001, regarding consideration of a revision to the Housing
Element of the City of Moorpark General Plan (General Plan
Amendment No. 2001 -02); and
WHEREAS, at each of the above - referenced meetings and
hearings of the Planning Commission, public testimony was
received from all those wishing to testify, and continued to be
received at the August 27, 2001, meeting at which time the
Planning Commission closed the pubic hearing; and
WHEREAS, after review and consideration of the information
contained in the staff reports of record, along with testimony
received on November 13 and 27, 2000, June 25 and August 27,
�`. 2001, the Planning Commission closed said hearing on August 27,
2001, and made a recommendation to the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Planning Commission hereby
determines that the revision to the Housing Element for 2000-
2005, dated July 2001, of the City of Moorpark General Plan does
not have the potential to create a significant effect upon the
environment and that a Negative Declaration in accordance with
the provisions of CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act)
may be issued, pursuant to Section 15074 of the California Code
of Regulations.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council the approval of the Revised
Housing Element for 2000 - 2005, dated July 2001, of the Moorpark
General Plan (attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference) based upon the following findings:
A. The Revised Housing Element est lishes goals,
�.- policies and objectives /programs tlt address the
provision of adequate, safe, and decent housing for
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 412 GPA 2001 -02 HOUSING.doc
Planning Commission Resolution
PC- 2001 -412
Recommending Adoption of Housing Element
�^ Page 2
j�
all economic segments of the community.
B. The Revised Housing Element satisfies and is
consistent with provisions for Housing Elements as
contained within Article 10.6 of the Government Code
regulating requirements for Housing Elements.
C. The Revised Housing Element is consistent with the
General Plan and all of its Elements.
THE ACTION WITH THE FOREGOING DIRECTION WAS APPROVED BY THE
FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
Ayes: Commissioners DiCecco, Haller and Landis, Vice Chair Otto
and Chair Parvin
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th, DAY OF August, 2001.
Ja ice Parvin, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Housing Element for 2000 -2005, dated July 2001,
of the Moorpark General Plan
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 412 GPA 2001 -02
HOUSING.doc
f
r`'
ee.., .
2000 -2005 Housing
Element
Draft
October 2001
CITY OF MOORPARK
Community Development Department
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Consultant to City:
CBA, Inc.
747 E. Green St., Suite #300
Pasadena, CA 91101
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Moorpark Housing Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... ............................1 -1
A. State Policy and Authorization .................................... ............................... 1 -2
B. Role of the Housing Element ...................................... ............................... 1 -2
C. Data Sources .............................................................. ............................... 1 -3
D. Public Participation ..................................................... ............................... 1 -3
E. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements ............. ............................... 1-4
II. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ............................ ............................2 -1
A. Population Characteristics .......................................... ............................... 2 -1
B. Household Characteristics .......................................... ............................... 2-5
C. Housing Stock Characteristics .................................... ............................... 2 -12
D. Regional Housing Needs ............................................ ............................... 2 -17
E. Assisted Housing At -Risk of Conversion ..................... ............................... 2 -22
III. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS ......................................... ............................3 -1
A. Market Constraints ..................................................... ............................... 3 -1
B. Governmental Constraints .......................................... ............................... 3-4
C. Environmental Constraints .......................................... ............................... 3-17
IV. HOUSING RESOURCES...
.................... ............................4 -1
A. Availability of Sites for Housing ................................... ............................... 4 -1
B. Financial Resources ................................................... ............................... 4 -7
C. Administrative Resources ........................................... ............................... 4 -11
D. Opportunities for Energy Conservation ....................... ............................... 4-12
V. HOUSING PLAN ......................................................... ............................5 -1
A. Evaluation of Past Accomplishments .......................... ............................... 5 -1
B. Goals and Policies ...................................................... ............................... 5-6
C. Programs ....................................................................... ............................5 -9
Figure 1: Environmental Constraints ..................................... ............................... 3-20
Appendix — Glossary of Terms
City of Moorpark
i
Housing Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chart Page
2 -1
Population Growth Trends .......................................... ...............................
2 -1
2 -2
Age Characteristics .................................................... ...............................
2 -2
2 -3
Race and Ethnicity ...................................................... ...............................
2 -3
2-4
Education Level .......................................................... ...............................
2-4
2 -5
Occupations Held by Residents .................................. ...............................
2-4
2-6
Household Type ......................................................... ...............................
2 -5
2-7
Household Composition .............................................. ...............................
2 -5
2 -8
Household Income ...................................................... ...............................
2-6
2 -9
Income Groups in Moorpark ....................................... ...............................
2-6
2 -10
Special Needs Groups in Moorpark ............................ ...............................
2 -7
2 -11
Housing for Special Needs Groups ............................. ...............................
2 -11
2 -12
Housing Composition ................................................. ...............................
2 -12
2 -13
Age of Housing Stock ................................................. ...............................
2 -13
2 -14
Housing Prices in Moorpark ........................................ ......
.I........................ 2 -14
2 -15
Housing Affordability Matrix ........................................ ...............................
2 -15
2 -16
Housing Problems Summary ...................................... ...............................
2-17
2 -17
Income by Ethnicity .................................................... ...............................
2-18
2 -18
Lower Income Households ......................................... ...............................
2 -18
2-19
Overcrowding Rate ..................................................... ...............................
2 -19
2 -20
Household Overcrowding Profile ................................ ...............................
2 -19
2-21
Overpayment Rate .....................................................
2 -20
2 -22
...............................
Household Overpayment Profile ................................. ...............................
2 -20
2 -23
Moorpark's RHNA Allocation ...................................... ...............................
2 -21
2 -24
Inventory of Assisted Units ......................................... ...............................
2 -22
3-1
Disposition of Home Loans ......................................... ...............................
3 -2
3 -2
Loan Disposition in Moorpark and Ventura County ..... ...............................
3 -3
3 -3
Residential Land Use Categories ............................... ...............................
3-4
3-4
Specific Plan Residential Land Use Summary ............ ...............................
3 -5
3 -5
Residential Development Standards ........................... ...............................
3-6
3 -6
Housing Types Permitted in Residential Zones .......... ...............................
3 -8
3 -7
Development Review Process .................................... ...............................
3 -10
3 -8
Development Review Time Frames ............................ ...............................
3 -11
3 -9
Development Review Fees ......................................... ...............................
3 -13
4-1
Regional Housing Needs Share for Moorpark ............. ...............................
4 -1
4 -2
Housing Projects on Residential Zoned Land ............. ...............................
4 -3
4 -3
Housing Projects Built/Planned on Commercial Land . ...............................
4-4
4-4
Additional Development Potential ............................... ...............................
4-5
4 -5
Summary of Efforts to Address the RHNA .................. ...............................
4 -6
4 -6
Financial Resources for Housing Activities ................. ...............................
4 -8
5 -1 Past Accomplishments ............................................... ............................... 5-5
5 -2 Housing Program Implementation Summary .............. ............................... 5-17
City of Moorpark ii Housing Element
INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION
Nestled among the rolling hills in the center of Ventura County, Moorpark incorporated
as a city in 1983. Beginning with the small settlements of Epworth and Fremonville,
Moorpark has experienced tremendous growth since the 1980s — increasing to a
population estimated at 30,000. Despite this rapid population growth, Moorpark has
retained its country charm reminiscent of a small town.
Moorpark is distinct from other communities in Ventura County. The City has a high
percentage of younger families between ages 25 to 44. Residents tend to have a
generally higher education level than many communities, and also the highest median
household income in the County. Due to the predominantly residential nature of the
community, Moorpark serves as a bedroom community for larger employment centers
throughout Ventura County and as well as northwest Los Angeles County.
The City's housing stock offers a range of housing opportunities consistent with the
urban -rural nature of Ventura County. The Downtown area offers a mix of older single -
family neighborhoods, commercial and higher density development. New residential
development is nestled in the surrounding hillsides, offering more rural settings.
Improvement in the Southern California economy has fostered increased residential
development in particular in Specific Plan areas and other areas around the perimeter.
�- Although the improvement in the economy has caused significant residential
development, it has also caused a rapid increase in housing and land prices. These
increases place a high burden upon lower income individuals and families, seniors, the
disabled, large families, farmworkers, and other persons with special housing needs.
Though higher priced homes ring the downtown area, the City's center contains much of
the older housing stock, some of which is showing significant signs of deterioration.
r^
Moorpark faces several challenges over the housing element period. These challenges
include maintaining the diversity of the housing stock, ensuring the affordability of the
housing stock, rehabilitating the older housing stock in the central downtown, fostering
economic development in the downtown, and balancing growth with the needs of
existing residents. For the present 2000 -2005 planning period, the City of Moorpark has
set forth the following goals for addressing the housing needs facing the community:
➢ Adequate provision of decent, safe and affordable housing for residents without
regard to race, age, sex, marital status, ethnicity, or other arbitrary considerations.
➢ Adequate provision of housing opportunities by type, tenure, and location with
particular attention to the provision of housing for special needs groups.
➢ Encourage growth through the identification of suitable parcels for residential
development, changes in land use pattems, and appropriate recycling of land.
➢ Develop a balanced community accessible to employment, transportation,
shopping, medical services, and governmental agencies among others.
City of Moorpark 1 -1 Housing Element
INTRODUCTION
A. State Policy and Authorization
The California Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and
suitable living environment for every citizen as the State's major housing goal.
Recognizing the important role of local planning programs in the pursuit of this goal,
the Legislature requires that all cities and counties prepare a housing element as
part of their comprehensive General Plan. The Government Code sets forth specific
components to be contained in a housing element, which must be updated at least
every five years to reflect a community's changing housing needs.
Moorpark's Housing Element was last updated in 1989 pursuant to State law.
Subsequent updates of the Housing Element were postponed, because the Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (the basis of the Housing Element) was not funded by
the State Legislature or prepared by SCAG until 2000. In the meantime, the
Legislature extended the original five -year Housing Element planning period from
1989 through 1998 until funding was authorized for SCAG to prepare the RHNA.
This Housing Element update is for the planning period of 2000 -2005.
B. Role of the Housing Element
Moorpark is faced with important challenges over the 2000 -2005 planning period.
Challenges include the following: balancing employment and housing opportunities;
ensuring a match between the supply of and demand for housing; providing housing
that is affordable for all segments of the population; and preserving the quality of the
housing stock. The 2000 -2005 Housing Element sets forth a series of goals, policies
and programs to provide housing to accommodate changes in the community.
The Housing Element is a five -year plan extending from 2000 -2005, unlike other
General Plan elements that cover a minimum ten -year planning horizon. This
Housing Element identifies strategies and programs that focus on: 1) conserving and
improving existing affordable housing; 2) providing adequate housing sites; 3)
assisting in the development of affordable housing; 4) removing governmental and
other constraints to development; and 5) promoting equal housing opportunities.
The Housing Element consists of the following major components:
• An analysis of the City's demographic profile, housing characteristics, and
existing and future housing needs (Section 2);
• A review of potential market, governmental, and environmental constraints to
meeting the City's identified housing needs (Section 3);
• An evaluation of the land, financial, and organizational resources available to
address the City's identified housing needs goals (Section 4); and
• A statement of the Housing Plan to address the Citys identified housing
needs, including housing goals, policies and programs (Section 5).
City of Moorpark 1 -2 Housing Element
r�
INTRODUCTION
C. Data Sources
Various sources of information are used to prepare the Housing Element. The 1990
Census provides the basis for population and household characteristics. Although
dated, the Census•remains the most comprehensive and widely accepted source of
information. In addition, 1990 Census data must be used in the Housing Element to
ensure consistency with other Regional, State, and Federal housing plans.
However, several sources of data are used to supplement and provide reliable
updates of the 1990 Census.
• Population and demographic data is updated by the State Department of
Finance, and school enrollment data from the local Unified School District;
• Housing market information, such as home sales, rents, and vacancies, is
updated by City surveys and property tax assessor's files;
• Public and nonprofit agencies are consulted for data on special needs
groups, the services available to them, and gaps in the system; and
• Lending patterns for home purchase and home improvement loans are
provided through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database.
D. Public Participation
Moorpark provided several opportunities for residents to comment on the Housing
Element and recommend strategies for adoption. Prior to public hearings, the
document was available for review at the City Hall and public libraries. To ensure a
wide distribution, the document was sent to the School District, Moorpark College
Library, and the Post Office. Local nonprofit and housing advocate groups were also
contacted regarding the availability of the Housing Element. In this manner, all
economic segments of residents had opportunity to review the Housing Element.
The Housing Element was then sent to the State Department of Housing and
Community Development for their comment. After HCD review, public hearings were
held before both the Planning Commission and the City Council. Notification was
also published in the local newspaper in advance of each hearing and copies of the
draft Element were available for public review. Public hearings were also telecast.
Comments from HCD and the public were incorporated in the Housing Element.
City of Moorpark 1 -3 Housing Element
f^
0
INTRODUCTION
E. Relationship to the General Plan
The Housing Element is one of the elements of the comprehensive General Plan.
Moorpark's General Plan is comprised of the following six elements: (1) Land Use
Element, (2) Circulation Element; (3) Housing Element; (4) Open Space,
Conservation & Recreation Element; (5) Noise Element; and (6) Safety Element.
The Housing Element builds upon the other General Plan Elements and is entirely
consistent with the policies set forth in those elements.
The City will ensure consistency between General Plan elements so that policies
introduced in one element are consistent with those in other elements. At this time,
the revised Element does not propose significant change to any other element of the
City's adopted General Plan. However, if it becomes apparent over time that
changes to another element are needed for internal consistency, such changes will
be proposed for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council.
City of Moorpark 1 -4 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Assuring the availability of decent and affordable housing for residents of all economic
strata is an important goal for Moorpark. To that end, this section of the Housing
Element analyzes population and housing characteristics to identify the City's specific
housing needs. Important characteristics to consider include: demographics, household
characteristics, housing characteristics, and its share of the region's housing needs.
This section serves as the basis for developing the City's goals, policies, and programs
designed to meet the City's identified housing needs in Chapter V, the "Housing Plan."
A. Population Characteristics
Population characteristics affect the type of housing need in a community. Population
growth, age characteristics, race /ethnicity, and employment trends determine the type of
housing need and the ability to afford different housing. This section details the various
population characteristics affecting housing needs.
1. Population Trends
Moorpark's population has increased significantly over the past 20 years (Chart 2 -1),
increasing by approximately 281%, by far the highest rate in the County of Ventura.
From an estimated 7,800 persons in 1980, prior to the City's incorporation in 1983,
the population increased to 25,494 by 1990. Since 1990, however, population
growth has slowed to an additional 16% over the decade to a total of 29,727 in 2000.
Significant population growth potential remains. As described later, over 3,100
homes are under construction which, based upon the City's average household size
of 3.3 persons, could result in 10,000 additional residents over the following decade.
According to the Southern California Association of Governments, this population
growth will continue at a slower pace through the Year 2020.
Chart 2 -1: Population Growth Trends
Source: State Department of Finance, 2000.
City of Moorpark 2 -1 Housing Element
Camarillo
37,797
52,303
63,335
68%
Moorpark
7,798
25,494
29,727
281%
Simi Valley
77,500
100,217
113,023
46%
Thousand Oaks
77,072
104,352
120,744
57%
Ventura County
529,174
669,016
756,501
43%
Source: State Department of Finance, 2000.
City of Moorpark 2 -1 Housing Element
W
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2. Age Characteristics
Housing needs are determined largely by the age characteristics of residents. Each
age group has distinct lifestyles, families, income levels, and housing preferences.
As people move through stages of life, their housing needs and preferences change.
Therefore, evaluating and understanding the age characteristics of a community is
an important factor in addressing existing and future housing needs of residents.
Compared to Ventura County communities, Moorpark has a higher proportion of
young, well - educated, upper income families. According to the 1990 Census, 43% of
Moorpark's population were comprised of individuals age 25-44 years compared to
35% for the County. In addition, children and adolescents made up 33% of
Moorpark's population compared to 27% Countywide. For adults over age 45, this
portion represents 16% of Moopark's population versus 27% Countywide. Seniors
represent 4% of residents in Moorpark, compared to 9% for the County.
One of the more important demographic changes taking place across Ventura
County communities is the gradual aging of the baby -boom generation (born
between 1946 -1964) and their children (1975- 1995). This should place an
increasing demand on more affordable single - family homes for the entry-level market
and for empty- nesters choosing to trade down their larger homes for smaller units.
Future age characteristics are also affected by recent developments. The upswing in
construction of single - family homes should draw a large in- migration of middle -aged
adults ages 44-64 and their children to the community of Moorpark through 2010.
Chart 2 -2 below summarizes and compares the age distribution of Moorpark
residents compared to that of Ventura County as a whole in 1990.
Chart 2 -2: Age Characteristics
11
G'ou
W090"
Preschool (0-4)
53,778
8 %p
2,924
11%
School Age (5 -17)
129,208
19%
5,610
22%
College Age (18-24)
71,825
11%
2,108
8%
Young Adults (25 -44)
230,575
35%
10,844
43%
Middle Age (45 -64)
120,625
18%
3,035
12%
Seniors (65 +)
63,005
9%
973
4%
Total
669,016
100%
25,494
100%
Median Age
31.7
29.2
Source: U.S. Census 1990
City of Moorpark 2 -2 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
3. Race and Ethnicity
The racial /ethnic composition of a city often has important implications for housing
need to the extent that different groups may have different household characteristics
(such as household size or average age), income levels, and cultural preferences
that affect the type of housing that is best suited to their family needs.
Understanding these differences provides a basis for addressing housing needs.
Moorpark's population has a racial/ethnic composition similar to that of the County.
Chart 2 -3 provides a comparison of race and ethnicity between Moorpark and
Ventura County in 1990. Whites made up over two- thirds of the population in both
the City and County, while Hispanics comprised 22% and 26% respectively. Asians
and African Americans comprised the smallest proportion in both jurisdictions.
Moorpark's racial /ethnic composition remained the same during the 1990s.
According to statistics from the Moorpark Unified School District, enrollment by
ethnicity from 1988 to 1999 has remained relatively stable. During this period, White
students accounted for approximately 62% of the school age population, while
Hispanic and Asian students comprised about 30% and 5% respectively.
Chart 2 -3: Race and Ethnicity
Y
^LT
�Cr ti
•¢i
S:a�i�:. '� °w'k :i:�'
"��.i"f
«,ru'...�L
r�����������
Source: U.S. Census 1990
As noted earlier, the differences in income levels by race- ethnicity typically may
affect the housing opportunities available to particular groups. For instance, with
respect to homeownership, over 82% of White households owned their own homes
compared to approximately 87% of Asian households, 69% of African American
households, and 67% of Hispanic households. The difference in homeownership
rates is largely related to income differences noted in a later section of this Element.
City of Moorpark 2 -3 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
4. Education and Employment
Education and employment levels are key factors in determining household income
and housing choices. Moorpark is particularly notable for its high education levels
and percentage of residents that hold professional and managerial positions. The
higher income level associated with these positions has shaped the demand for
single - family housing in the community.
The educational level of Moorpark residents
is markedly higher than that of Ventura
County (Chart 2-4). As of the 1990 Census,
approximately 38% of Moorpark residents
held an associate's degree or higher
college degree, while over 66% of residents
had attended college. In contrast, only 32%
of Ventura County residents over the age of
25 had a college degree and 57% had
some college education. The high
educational status of residents is typically
reflected in the higher - paying occupations
held by residents.
Chart 2-4: Education Level
28%
KS.
Owe
20%
Due in part to the higher level of education of residents, Moorpark has benefited from
a low unemployment rate of 2.8% in 1999 compared to 4.8% for the County.
Moreover, almost 40% of City residents held high paying managerial or professional
positions compared to 29% of County residents. City residents also held a smaller
share of labor and production positions (13 %) than residents Countywide (23 %).
Chart 2 -5: Occupations Held by Residents
Source: U.S. Census 1990
Though almost 40% of Moorpark residents hold managerial or professional jobs,
most do not work in the City. In fact, only 7% of Moorpark residents work within the
City boundaries; whereas, 93% commute to jobs outside the City. This is compared
with 57% of Ventura County residents who work outside their place of residence.
Thus Moorpark serves as a bedroom community for nearby businesses.
City of Moorpark
2 -4
Housing Element
�u V_
Managerial /Professional
98,253
29%
74,218 654
39%
Sales, Technical, Admin.
107,561
32%
35%
Service Occupations
37,637
11%
99
10%
Production and Labor
77,413
23%
1,586
13%
Farming, Forestry, Fishery
15,908
5%
373
3%
Total
336,772
100%
12,030
100%
Source: U.S. Census 1990
Though almost 40% of Moorpark residents hold managerial or professional jobs,
most do not work in the City. In fact, only 7% of Moorpark residents work within the
City boundaries; whereas, 93% commute to jobs outside the City. This is compared
with 57% of Ventura County residents who work outside their place of residence.
Thus Moorpark serves as a bedroom community for nearby businesses.
City of Moorpark
2 -4
Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
B. Household Characteristics
Household type and size, income levels, the presence of special needs populations, and
other household characteristics determine the type of housing needed by residents.
This section details the various household characteristics of Moorpark's residents, while
Section D of this Chapter discusses existing housing needs of residents.
1. Household Characteristics
According to the California Department of
Finance (DOF), Moorpark had 8,796
households as of January 2000. This is a
15% increase since 1990. Chart 2-6
illustrates the three major households types
in Moorpark according to the 1990 Census.
The household composition of Moorpark
included a higher percentage of families
(85 %) versus 76% in Ventura County. The
remaining percentage of the community's
households were comprised of either single
persons (9 %) or other households (6 %).
Chart 2.6: Household Type
According to the Department of Finance, in 2000, the City's average household size
!� was 3.3, relatively unchanged since 1990. The largest group of households in
Moorpark is families. Among family households, the largest share are married
couples with children (49 %) followed by married couples with no children (25 %).
Single parents with children comprise 6% of families. In contrast, married couples
with children comprise a third of the households in the County (Chart 2 -7).
Chart 2 -7: Household Composition
��
eiin4�ountY
. o d
w ..
Peres
H�ousefi"`
P"erce
Households
217,298
—
7,621
—
Families
164,774
76%
6,436
84%
Married No Children
62,944
29%
1,906
25%
Married With Children
71,431
33%
3,741
49%
Single Parent
18,764
9%
491
6%
Other Families
11,634
5%
298
4%
Non - Families
52,525
24%
1,185
16%
Singles
37,991
17%
702
9%
Other
14,534
7%
483
6%
Source: U.S. Census 1990.
City of Moorpark 2 -5 Housing Element
SOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2. Household Income
Household income levels determine a family's ability to balance the costs of renting
or owning a home while reserving sufficient income to afford other necessities for
their families. Income levels can vary considerably among households, based upon
their tenure (renters or owners), and household type, among other factors.
In 1990, Moorpark households earned
a median income of $60,368 --
significantly higher than the Ventura
eo%
County average of $45,612. As shown
in Chart 2 -8, Moorpark's income profile
eo%
consists primarily of upper income
households (63 %) versus a
significantly smaller percentage of
40%
lower (17 %) income households. In
contrast, Ventura County had a
lox
significantly lower percentage of upper
income households (45 %), and a
significantly higher percent of lower
n%
(33 %) income households.
Chart 2-a: Household Income
Very Low Low Wderate Upper
The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) classes
households into the following categories based on income, tenure, and household
size as a percentage of the County median family income (MFI):
• Very Low: Earned up to 50% of the County MFI
• Low: Earned 51 % to 80% of the County MFI
• Moderate: Earned 81% to 120% of the County MFI
• Upper: Earned above 120% of the County MFI
Chart 2 -9 summarizes the distribution of income among households within Moorpark.
Approximately 40% of the lower income households in the City are renters. On the
other hand, 30% of moderate income households, rent. Upper income households
are almost exclusively homeowners, almost 90% own their home.
Chart 2 -9: Income Groups In Moorpark
Source: Southern Cafifomia Association of Governments, 1998.
City of Moorpark 2 -6 Housing Element
.e"�,y Cuv
`"t' {A-t
Source: Southern Cafifomia Association of Governments, 1998.
City of Moorpark 2 -6 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
r'
I Special Needs Groups
Certain groups have greater difficulty in finding decent, affordable housing due to
special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one's employment
and income, family characteristics, disability, and household characteristics among
others. As a result, certain Moorpark residents may experience a higher prevalence
of lower income, overpayment, overcrowding, or other housing problems.
State Housing Element law defines "special needs" groups to include the following:
senior households, disabled persons, larger households, single parent families with
children, homeless people, and farm - workers. This section therefore contains a
detailed discussion of the housing needs facing each particular group as well as city
programs and services available to address their housing needs.
Defining housing issues of a special needs group is clearer than defining the
magnitude. Because Housing Elements in the SCAG region must be submitted
before the 2000 Census is published, the 1990 Census must be used to estimate the
size of a particular need group. The use of the 1990 Census may therefore not
reflect the magnitude of changes that have occurred between 1990 and 2000.
Chart 2 -10 below summarizes the special needs groups residing in Moorpark.
Chart 2 -10: Special Needs Groups in Moorpark
Note: 1. Fannworkers: includes agricultural, fishing and forestry workers.
Source: U.S. Census 1990
City of Moorpark 2 -7 Housing Element
Seniors (65 years and older)
973
513', `
4%
Disabled Persons (16+ years)
Work Disability
735
4%
Mobility /Self -Care Limitation
711
3 "/,
Large HHDs (5+ members).
1,407
19%
Single Parent Households
Single Parents w/ children
491
5%
Other Subfamilies
_: ":' ''
106
1°/,
College Students
1,811
7%
Homeless Persons
<10
0%
Farmworkers'
373
1%
Note: 1. Fannworkers: includes agricultural, fishing and forestry workers.
Source: U.S. Census 1990
City of Moorpark 2 -7 Housing Element
r,
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Senior Citizens.
Senior citizens are considered a special needs group, because their limited income,
health costs, and disabilities make it much more difficult to afford suitable housing.
For Housing Element purposes, senior households are defined as 65 years or older.
Moorpark was home to 513 senior householders, of which 432 were owners and 81
were renters. Seniors have special housing needs due to the following:
✓ Disabilities. A high share of seniors (20 %) have a self -care or mobility
limitation, defined as a condition lasting over six months which makes it
difficult to go outside the home alone or take care of one's personal needs.
✓ Limited Income. Because of their retired status and fixed income, well over
50% of senior households earn lower income- placing a significant burden on
their ability to purchase other necessities of life, in particular medical care.
✓ Overpayment. Because of the limited supply of affordable housing, over
30% of senior households overpay for housing. Overpayment also varies by
tenure: 22% of homeowners and 59% of renters are overpaying.
Moorpark has a variety of services for senior residents including a congregate
nutrition program, specially delivered meals to homebound seniors, direct food
assistance for low income seniors, and a range of senior activities. Medical
transportation is also provided via the Senior Survival mobile. In addition, Tafoya
�-_ Terrace provides housing for lower- income seniors residing in Moorpark.
Disabled Persons.
Moorpark is home to a number of people who have a physical or mental disability
that prevent them from working, restrict their mobility, or make it difficult to care for
themselves. The 1990 Census defines three major disabilities: (1) work disability, (2)
mobility limitation, which makes it difficult to go outside the home alone; and (3) self
care limitations, which make it difficult to take care of one's personal needs. Taken
together, 4% of residents have a work disability; 3% a self care /mobility limitation.
Various programs can encourage the provision of special housing design features
(e.g., wheel chair ramps, holding bars, special bathroom designs, wider doors, etc)
as a means to assist disabled persons to live independently. Special housing can
also be provided for disabled persons. In the nonprofit sector, the California
Foundation for Independent Living Centers provides information, support and
resources to promote the Independent Living philosophy for disabled persons.
For persons unable to live in an independent setting or who need additional care,
Moorpark complies with the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act.
The City allows State - authorized, certified, or licensed family care homes, foster
homes, or group homes serving six or less disabled persons in all residential zones.
Moorpark has one residential facility for the elderly /disabled. In addition, the City
funds a paratransit service to meet the transportation needs for disabled residents.
City of Moorpark 2 -8 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Large Households.
The Federal Government defines large households as having five or more members.
Large households are considered to have special needs, because the shortage of
affordable and adequately sized housing makes overcrowding and overpayment
more prevalent. The 1990 Census reported that Moorpark had over 1,407 large
households, of which 1,052 owned homes and 355 rented homes. Large households
have the following housing needs.
✓ Limited Income. Approximately 23% of large families in Moorpark earned
low income, according to the 1990 Census. Of that total, approximately 61%
of renters and 39% of owners earned low incomes.
✓ Available Housing. Moorpark had 5,000 large homes and 752 rentals (3 or
more bedrooms) that could easily accommodate large families; however,
many of the units are not affordable to them as evidenced below.
✓ Housing Problems. Because of high housing costs, 92% of renters
overpaid for housing and 67% lived in overcrowded conditions in 1990.
Among large owner households, 20% overpaid and 19% were overcrowded.
One of the greatest housing shortage in most communities is larger rental units. To
address the issue, the Federal Government provides Section 8 assistance for
property owners accepting the certificates. Communities can provide incentives
�^ (such as land write - downs) for developers to build larger apartments with three or
more bedrooms that can accommodate larger households. Or some communities will
require the provision of inclusionary units through developer agreements.
Single Parents.
Single parents often require special consideration and assistance as a result of their
lower income, high costs of childcare, and the need for affordable housing.
According to the 1990 Census, Moorpark was home to 491 single parents with
dependent children under age 18 and 106 single parent subfamilies living with other
families. Single parents with children typically have the following needs.
✓ Limited Income. According to the 1990 Census, the poverty rate among
female- headed families was 24% for families with children under age 18 and
over 30% for those with children under age 5.
✓ Childcare Costs. According to Census Bureau publications, single parent
households spend 12% of their income on preschool childcare; those earning
less than $15,000 spend up to 25% of their income.
✓ Housing Problems. Although no statistics are available, it is reasonable to
assume that single parents pay a larger share of their income for housing and
therefore have higher overpayment rates.
City of Moorpark 2 -9 Housing Element
P-'
�w
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Students.
Students have special housing needs due to limited income and financial resources.
Many students attending part-time in community colleges work full -time jobs, while
full time students often work less. In either case, students often earn low income,
pay more than half their income for housing, and thus may double up to save
income. According to the 1990 Census, however, 1,811 persons, or approximately
7% of the total population, living in Moorpark was enrolled in college.
The City of Moorpark is located near many regional colleges, including California
State University (Northridge), University of California (Ventura), California Lutheran,
and other smaller colleges. Locally, the City is home to Moorpark Community
College with an enrollment of over 10,000 students. Of this total, approximately
1,000 students come from the City of Moorpark itself, 3,500 from Simi Valley, 4,000
from the Conejo Valley, and 1,800 from the remainder of Ventura County.
The type of housing need depends on the nature of the enrollment. Currently, 2/3rds
of the students are part-time and working within their respective communities. As is
the case with most community colleges, no housing is provided by the College.
Because the vast majority of students commute from other communities where they
work or live, the need for housing is not considered significant. Moorpark College
does, however, assist students in finding appropriate housing in the community.
Homeless Persons.
1990 Census data show that there are no homeless people living in Moorpark.
However, the 1990 Census Bureau count of the homeless is seriously flawed in that
it only counts homeless people in emergency shelters or on the streets and was only
point estimate rather than time estimate. Still, the homeless population in Moorpark
is extremely small, fewer than 10 persons, as reported by regional service agencies.
While there are no homeless shelters in Moorpark, several homeless shelters and
service providers operate in adjacent communities. These include the Conejo Winter
Shelter in Thousand Oaks, which is operated by Lutheran Social Services, the winter
shelter run by PADS in Simi Valley, and the Samaritan Center in Simi Valley, which
operates a drop -in center that offers supportive services to the homeless.
As a member of the Ventura Council of Government's Standing Committee on
Homelessness, the City is engaged in addressing homelessness and the needs of
the homeless throughout the region. Locally, the City funds Catholic Charities, which
provides eviction prevention services that help very low income individuals and
families that are at risk of becoming homeless. In addition, the agency provides a
variety of services such as food, clothing and referrals to those persons who are
homeless. Channel Counties Legal Services, in conjunction with Catholic Charities,
also provides legal assistance, such as eviction prevention services and
landlord /tenant counseling, one day a week to lower income Moorpark residents.
City of Moorpark 2 -10 Housing Element
SOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Farmworkers.
According to the 1990 Census, there are approximately 373 persons working in
occupations dealing with natural resources. Natural resource jobs include those in
fanning, fishing and forestry. However, standard Census data regarding natural
resource jobs over - estimate the City's farmworker population, because it includes a
range of other nonfarm related employment. Much of the agricultural land is located
outside of Moorpark, although a small amount of farm land does exists in Moorpark.
Few if any migrant farm workers reside within the community of Moorpark. However,
the City does have one complex for permanent farm worker housing and permits
additional farm worker housing in certain zones pursuant to a conditional use permit.
Housing for Special Needs Groups
Moorpark has a wide range of housing options for its special needs populations.
These consist of a residential care facility and public housing for the elderly and
disabled, affordable single - family housing for lower income farmworker households,
and affordable housing for lower income households including larger units. Chart 2-
11 identifies the type of housing available for special needs groups in Moorpark.
Chart 2 -11: Housing for Special Needs Groups
Under construction
Approved and awaiting construction
+ In Planning Phase
City of Moorpark 2 -11 Housing Element
Tafoya Terrance
Public Housing
30 units
disabled
Villa Del Arroyo
Mobilehomes
48 of 480
MreWcted
(bonds)
Colibri Elder Care
Residential Care
6 beds
bled
Villa Campesina
Single- family homes
62 units
mworkers
Archstone Le Club
Apartments
74 units
Lower income households
(bond)
Archstone
Apartments
'62 units
Lower income households
Mountain View
Single - family homes
15 units
Low Incomellarger fandlies
Pacific
Communities
Single - family homes
**22 units
Low Income/larger families
Moorpark
Highlands
Single- family homes
"25 units
Low -mod income large families
Hitch Ranch Plan
Apartments
+100 uni
Low - moderate income families
Villa Del Arroyo
Mobilehome
48 uni
Restricted as low income units
LT Development+
Apartments
-80 uni
Lower income families
U.S. A. Procerties+
Apartment
176 uniW
Senior housing
Under construction
Approved and awaiting construction
+ In Planning Phase
City of Moorpark 2 -11 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
C. Housing Stock Characteristics
This section of the Housing Element addresses various housing characteristics and
conditions that affect the community and their housing needs. Important housing stock
issues include the following: housing stock and growth, type of housing available, the
tenure and vacancy rates, housing age, condition, and housing cost and affordability.
1. Housing Stock Characteristics
A certain degree of diversity within the community's housing stock is an important
factor in ensuring that adequate housing opportunities are available for Moorpark's
existing and future residents. A diverse housing stock helps to ensure that all
households, regardless of their income level, age group, and family size, have the
opportunity to find housing that is best suited to their lifestyle needs.
As of January 2000, the City had 9,135 housing units. As shown in Chart 2-12, the
predominant housing type is the single - family homes, accounting for 83% of the
housing stock. Single- family attached homes comprised 10% of all housing units.
Both smaller multi - family projects and larger complexes with more than 5 units made
up 14% of the housing stock, while mobilehomes were 3% of housing in Moorpark.
Moorpark also has a particularly notable high owner - occupancy rate of over 80% as
r well as with a generally low level of vacancies. In 1990, the overall vacancy rate was
modest — at 2.0% for single - family and 6.3% for multi - family units. By 2000, the
vacancy rate had dipped to 1%. This is below the optimal vacancy rates of 1.5 -2.0%
for single - family units, and 5 -6% for rental housing, according to SCAG.
(1�
Chart 2 -12: Housing Composition
x'
Ay��
uG3' S'. wY% xv. n3a%. vy,' �. �. 3M• �eQ£.$ cv.. iu6uc""��ipuv&^.T^1••o...tL�'bR
• , -
\'Y�2Sq a^S1 �s��{•�,^.i�,
��`IM'„i✓k-
®
I,ft`'y
%�^�'.�`�I
®
x: 9�T �
�F
®
r�_
f �','9 •J�a}
t•� [..u'W
'yR
S. �'
®®
Multi-Farnily (5+)
®
®
®
®®
Total Housing Units
•
1'
Source: 1990 Census, State Department or Finance, 2000.
City of Moorpark 2 -12 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2. Housing Age and Condition
Housing age is often used as an indication of when homes require reinvestment.
Most homes require greater maintenance as they approach 30 years of age.
Common repairs needed include a new roof, wall plaster, and stucco. Homes older
than 50 years require more substantial repairs, such as new siding, or plumbing, in
order to maintain and extend the useful life and quality of the structure.
According to the 1990 Census and
1999 data from the State Department
of Finance, approximately 90% of all
housing units in Moorpark are less than
30 years old. In fact, the vast majority
of homes in the City were constructed
recently during the 1980s. Compared
with the rest of Ventura County,
Moorpark has a much newer housing
stock that is generally in good
condition. The only exception are a few
older homes in the downtown core.
Chart 2 -13 identifies the percentage of
housing units in Moorpark according to
the age of the building as of 2000.
Chart 2 -13: Age of Housing Stock
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0.29 yrs 30.50 yrs 60+ yrs
According to the 1990 Census, a total of 45 housing units did not have a kitchen, 37
units had incomplete plumbing, 27 units did not have sewer or septic tank disposal,
and 16 units lacked fuel heating. No units were reported as boarded up. The
majority of the City's substandard units are concentrated in the oldest parts of
downtown Moorpark. The number of substandard units has not increased over time.
Several older units have been demolished in recent years as property is recycled.
For more routine issues, the City's Code Enforcement Division employs two full time
code enforcement officers. Typical issues include property maintenance, illegally
parked /inoperative vehicles, overgrown vegetation, and housing conditions. Code
enforcement activities are focused in the central area of Moorpark, where much of
the City's older housing stock is located. The Division works in conjunction with the
rehabilitation program to identify homes that may benefit from services.
City of Moorpark
2 -13
Housing Element
HOUSENG NEEDS ASSESSMENT
W
3. Housing Costs and Affordability
The cost of housing is directly related to the extent of housing problems in a
community. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income,
there will be a correspondingly higher prevalence of overpayment and overcrowding.
This section summarizes housing costs for housing in Moorpark and evaluates the
affordability of the City's housing stock to low and moderate income households.
Housing Prices and Rents.
To obtain a representative picture of housing costs in Moorpark, a comprehensive
survey was undertaken of home sales from September 1998 through October 1999
based on information from Dataquick. Moreover, an internet survey and phone
survey were conducted to obtain the monthly rents charged at apartment complexes
throughout Moorpark. Chart 2 -14 summarizes the results of the survey.
During this period, 883 single - family units and condominiums were sold in Moorpark.
Almost 90% of homes sold during this period were three- and four - bedroom units
and the median price was approximately $253,500. Condominiums represented
20% of the housing units sold and the median sales price was less at $142,000 due
to their smaller lot and building size (e.g., two or three bedroom units).
Chart 2 -14: Housing Prices in Moorpark
Source: L.A. Times and Dataquick Corp., October 1999, Internet and Phone Survey (2000)
Rental housing represents a much smaller percentage of the housing stock in
Moorpark. According to the Census, renter - occupied housing comprises 11 percent
of all housing units in the City. The rental market in Moorpark consists primarily of
apartments, and to a lesser degree townhomes, condominiums, and some single -
family homes. As shown in Chart 2 -14, rental rates for Moorpark ranged from $980
for a one - bedroom apartment to $1,500 for a three - bedroom unit.
City of Moorpark 2 -14 Housing Element
77�
4
�NMT,
�
1/
®
®®
©
'. 111
®
' 111
��K?
M-0 W
'. 11
• 11
�
111
���
Source: L.A. Times and Dataquick Corp., October 1999, Internet and Phone Survey (2000)
Rental housing represents a much smaller percentage of the housing stock in
Moorpark. According to the Census, renter - occupied housing comprises 11 percent
of all housing units in the City. The rental market in Moorpark consists primarily of
apartments, and to a lesser degree townhomes, condominiums, and some single -
family homes. As shown in Chart 2 -14, rental rates for Moorpark ranged from $980
for a one - bedroom apartment to $1,500 for a three - bedroom unit.
City of Moorpark 2 -14 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Housing Affordability.
Housing affordability can be inferred by comparing the cost of renting or owning a
home in Moorpark with the maximum affordable housing cost for households that
earn different income levels. Taken together, this information can provide a picture
of who can afford what size and type of housing as well as indicate the type of
households that would likely experience overcrowding or overpayment.
The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) determines income
levels based on HUD's annual determination of the median income for Ventura
County. These income levels are adjusted for differences in the type and size of a
family. HCD uses these income levels to determine the maximum amount that a
household could pay and their eligibility for housing assistance.
Chart 2 -15 shows the annual income for very low, low, and moderate income
households by the size of the family and the maximum affordable housing payment
based on the federal standard of 30% of household income. Standard housing costs
for utilities, taxes, and property insurance are also shown. From these income and
housing cost figures, the maximum affordable home price and rent is determined.
Chart 2 -15: Housing Affordability Matrix
r x
AFx '• ,A
I
ly
x�4
}�^ ,. -
rua Y�ti3e«'+
'
2.
tvd::..uvrv£
Large Family
'. 111,:
111
���
• 111
RIM
11
®
111
• - 2
Notations:
1. Small Family = 3 persons; large Family = 5 or more persons;
2. Monthly affordable payment based on payments of no more than 30% of household income;
3. Property taxes and insurance based on averages for the region;
4. Calculation of affordable home sales prices based on a down payment of 10 %, annual interest
rate of 8 %, 30 -year mortgage, utility costs of $50 -150 per month, and $200 per month in taxes
and insurance.
City of Moorpark 2 -15 Housing Element
J"
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Affordability by Household Income.
The previous chart showed the maximum amount that a household in a particular
income range can pay for housing each month without exceeding the federally -
defined 30% income - housing cost threshold for overpayment. This amount can be
compared to current market prices for single - family homes, condominiums, and
apartments to determine what types of housing opportunities a household can afford.
Very Low Income Households. Very low income households in Moorpark earn
between $24,000 and $37,000 depending on the size of the family. Based on
financing criteria noted earlier, the maximum affordable home price ranges from
$53,000 to $87,000. Because the majority of homes in Moorpark exceed $200,000,
single - family homes are not a viable option for very low income households.
Therefore, very low income households are typically limited to the rental market.
Average apartment rents in 2000 were $1,000 for a one - bedroom unit, $1,200 for a
two- bedroom unit, and $1,450 for a three - bedroom unit. Since a very low income
household can pay $550 to $775 in rent per month, the rent for an apartment is well
beyond what a very low income household could afford to pay. As a result, a very
low income family renting in Moorpark would be faced with severe overpayment.
Low Income Households. Low income households in Moorpark earn between
(, $35,000 and $54,000 depending on the size of the family. The maximum affordable
home price ranges from $95,000 to $152,000. Though there is a small number of
homes that sold for under $152,000, the closing costs and the down payment would
be a serious obstacle to homeownership for low income families. However, a low -
income family could afford a condominium, which average $142,000.
Based on the earlier affordability matrix, a low income household could afford to pay
between $800 and $1,200 for an apartment. Given the range of rents in Moorpark, a
low income household could afford a one or two- bedroom unit. Because of the
scarcity of three and four bedroom apartment units, a large family may not afford
market rents for such units without overpayment or living in overcrowded conditions.
Moderate Income Households. Moderate income households, earning between
$57,500 and $88,800, can afford a home price between $180,000 and $280,000.
Though half of the homes for sale in 1999 were priced under $280,000, down
payment, closing costs, and the recent interest rate increases may act as a barrier to
home ownership even for moderate income households. In order to overcome this
difficulty, the City could provide down payment assistance programs as an effective
mechanism to transition moderate income renters to home ownership.
While more limited in number, condominiums are an affordable home ownership
opportunity for moderate income households since sales prices range from
approximately $100,000 to $300,000. For moderate - income households earning in
the lower range of their income category, assistance with down payment and closing
costs will further enable moderate income families to overcome this hurdle.
City of Moorpark 2 -16 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
D. Regional Housing Needs
State law requires all regional councils of government, including the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG), to determine the existing and projected housing
need for its region (Government Code Section 65580 et. seq.). SCAG is also required to
determine the share of need allocated to each city and county within the SCAG region.
This is called the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
1. Existing Housing Needs
• continuing priority of communities is enhancing or maintaining their quality of life.
• key measure of quality of life in a community is the extent of "housing problems."
The Department of Housing and Urban Development and SCAG have developed an
existing need statement that details the number of households, which are paying too
much for housing or are living in overcrowded units. These are defined below:
➢ Low Income: refers to a household, which eams less than 80% of the
regional median income, adjusted for household size. Depending on
household size, income must fall below approximately $50,000 annually.
➢ Overcrowding: refers to a housing unit which is occupied by more than
one person per room, excluding kitchens, bathrooms, hallways, and
porches, as defined by the Federal Government.
➢ Overpayment: refers to a household paying more than 30% of gross
income for mortgage or rent, including costs for utilities, property insurance,
and real estate taxes as defined by the Federal Government.
Substandard Housing: refers to a housing unit which has an incomplete
kitchen, bathroom, or plumbing facilities. Given that housing in Moorpark is
relatively newer, substandard housing is less of an issue in this Element.
Chart 2 -16 below summarizes key indicators of existing housing needs of
overcrowding and overpayment of households in the City of Moorpark. Later charts
present these issues in terms of household size, type, age, and income levels.
Chart 2 -16: Housing Problems Summary
t 4 ,dower
F�ype*r r'
tncoms
theer
Cr wdtng amsnt.fi.
Total
16%
7%
48%
Seniors
52%
0%
40%
Small Families
9%
2%
48%
Large Families
23%
29%
50%
Others
16%
2% 1
50%
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, 1990.
City of Moorpark 2 -17 Housing Element
r
ROUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Household Income.
As discussed earlier, Moorpark is a relatively wealthy community, with the highest
median income of any other community in Ventura County. Despite this wealth,
there are certain segments of the population which earn low income and, given the
high housing costs in the region, are subject to overcrowding and overpayment. This
section examines households at greatest risk of these housing problems.
Chart 2 -17 shows the proportion of
each racelethnic group that earn
extremely low, very low and low
income. Each category is defined by
its relationship to the County median
family income. Asians and African
Americans have the lowest proportion
of lower income households.
Hispanic households comprise 52%
of lower income households and of
that percentage, one -fifth are
extremely low income. Thus Hispanic
households appear to be at a
significantly greater risk of housing
problems, such as overcrowding.
Chart 2 -17: Income by Ethnicity
60% _
50% ---- - - -- - F-0 ---------
Low \
ao% — - - - - - - - ------
30% ---- --- --- - ------- --- -- - -----
20% -------- -- ------------------
10% ` - -- ---- ---- - -- .....
0% I
White Hispanic Asian African -Am
Chart 2 -18 illustrates the proportion of households, by household type, that earn
lower incomes in Moorpark. Approximately one -fifth of large households earn lower
incomes. Moreover, over half of the large renter households earn lower incomes. Of
large renter households, over 90% of those earning very low incomes were Hispanic.
Though many elderly households in Moorpark also had lower incomes, this is
presumably due to their fixed incomes. Because most seniors in Moorpark have
already paid for their own homes and have a smaller household size, they are less
vulnerable to overpayment and overcrowding than other groups.
Chart 2 -18: Lower Income Households
�
bc.
n
orJSO
m 4
p(
Seniors (62 and over)
37%
15%
52%
Small Related (2-4 persons)
5%
%%
9%
Large Related (5 +)
12%
10%
22%
All Other Households
9%
7%
16%
Total
9%
7%
16%
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Study, 1990.
City of Moorpark 2 -18 Housing Element
Pte'
t^
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Overcrowding.
An important measure of quality of life is the extent of overcrowding in a community.
Planning areas with high levels of overcrowding are often associated with a relatively
higher level of noise, deterioration of homes, and a shortage of on -site parking.
Therefore, maintaining a reasonable level of occupancy and alleviating overcrowded
housing conditions is an important contributor to quality of life.
Overcrowding occurs when housing
costs are so high relative to income
25%
that families double -up to save
income to afford necessities of life.
20%
As shown in Chart 2 -19, the
neom
overcrowding rate in Moorpark is 19%
for renters and 7% for owners. This is
15%
similar to Ventura County because
Total
although Moorpark has a higher
10%
income level than the County, the
17%
sales prices for single family homes
5%
also exceed the County average.
0%
Therefore, housing overcrowding
0%
rates are similar in both jurisdictions.
1%
Chart 2 -19: Overcrowding Rate
MDMark County
Overcrowding rates vary significantly by income, type, and household (Chart 2 -20).
Renter households have the highest total level of overcrowding at 18 %. This level of
overcrowding is over three times that of owners due to their lower incomes.
Regardless of income level or tenure, overcrowding is concentrated in large families,
where 46% of renters and 22% of homeowners live in overcrowded conditions.
In Moorpark, over half the low income, large households experienced overcrowding —
due to the limited affordable and suitably sized housing that is available to them.
Overcrowding tends to disproportionately affect Hispanics, who have the highest
prevalence of large, lower income families. Moreover, the highest prevalence of
overcrowding is located within the older Downtown portion of the community.
Chart 2 -20: Household Overcrowding Profile
Fa
neom
Total
7 %H
5%
18%
17%
Elderly (older than age 62)
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small Families (2-4 persons)
2%
1%
8%
10%
Large Families (5 or more)
29%
22%
46%
51%
Others
2%
1%
6%
0%
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, 1990.
City of Moorpark
2 -19
Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Overpayment,
Housing overpayment occurs when housing costs increase much faster than income.
As in other communities in California, housing overpayment is not uncommon in
Moorpark. However, to the extent that overpayment is disproportionately
concentrated among the most vulnerable members of Moorpark, maintaining a
reasonable level of housing cost burden is an important contributor to quality of life.
Chart 2 -21 shows that housing
N
overpayment differs among residents of
6o%
Moorpark and that of Ventura County.
According to the 1990 Census, the
50%
County and Moorpark have identical
overpayment rates for rental housing.
40%
However, there is a large difference with
30%
respect to owner overpayment. Among
Elderly
owner - occupied housing, 35% County
20%
homeowners and 49% of the City's
54%
homeowners overpay for housing.
to%
Unlike many communities, overpayment
50%
is more by choice in Moorpark.
0%
Chart 2 -21: Overpayment Rate
Moorpark County
Of particular note, housing overpayment is most prevalent among upper income
owner households. Currently, nearly 2/3rds of the all households overpaying for
housing in Moorpark earn well above the County's median family income. This is
because some families intentionally choose to pay more for their housing when
moving up into larger homes. Because of their relatively higher income, these
families still have more disposable income despite higher cost burdens.
Though housing overpayment affects many households in Moorpark, lower income
households are disproportionately impacted. For instance, over 90% of the
community's small, lower income households and 80% of large, lower income
households face overpayment problems and more than half these groups faced
severe overpayment (e.g., paying more than half of their income on housing).
Therefore, overpayment is particularly severe for certain groups of residents.
Chart 2 -22: Household Overpayment Profile
to
N
Owns
Mrs._
�ow '
Total
48%
49%
45%
77%
Elderly
40%
40%
43%
54%
Small Families
48%
47%
50%
92%
Large Families
50%
53%
42%
80%
Others
50%
56%
37%
721%
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, 1990.
City of Moorpark 2 -20 Housing Element
HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
2. Future Housing Need
Future housing need refers to the share of the region's housing need that has been
allocated to a community. In brief, SCAG calculates future housing need based
upon their household growth forecast, plus a certain amount of units needed to
account for normal and appropriate level of vacancies and the replacement of units
that are normally lost to conversion or demolition. The Ventura Council of
Governments (VCOG) served as a delegate agency in assisting these efforts.
In allocating the region's future housing needs to Jurisdictions SCAG is required to
❑ Market demand for housing
❑ Em to ment opportunities
❑ Availability of suitable sites and public facilities
• Commuting patterns
• Type and tenure of housing
• Loss of units in assisted housing developments
• Over - concentration of lower income households
❑ Geological and topographical constraints
In 1999, SCAG developed its Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) based
upon population, employment and household forecasts contained in the regional
transportation plan from 199 8-2005. SCAG then makes an adjustment to allow for a
certain number of vacant units to ensure adequate mobility and to replace units lost
to demolition, conversion, or natural disaster. Finally, SCAG then makes a
determination as to the number of units to be affordable to different income groups.
Chart 2 -23: Moorpark's RHNA Allocation
Source: Ventura Council of Governments, May 2, 2000.
City of Moorpark 2 -21 Housing Element
MEl
hres_hold' �
nits,
a
Very Low
00.50%
<$34,250
269
21%
Low
51-80%
<$50,200
5_5
12%
Moderate
81 -120%
<$82,200
3833
31%
Upper
120 %+
Above
448
36%
Total
1y5
100%
Source: Ventura Council of Governments, May 2, 2000.
City of Moorpark 2 -21 Housing Element
HOUSDPG NEEDS ASSESSMENT
r^
f�
E. Assisted Housing At -Risk of Conversion
Existing housing that receives governmental assistance is often a significant source of
affordable housing in many communities. Because of its significance, this section
identifies publicly assisted rental housing in Moorpark, evaluates the potential to convert
to market rates between 2000 and 2010, and analyzes the cost to preserve those units.
Resources for preservation/replacement are described in Chapter 4 of the Element and
housing programs to address preservation of these units are described in Chapter 5.
1. Assisted Housing Inventory
Two government- assisted rental housing projects are located in Moorpark; however,
neither project is at -risk of conversion to market -rate (Chart 2 -24). Tafoya Terrance,
a 30 -unit public housing complex operated by the Ventura County Housing Authority,
provides affordable rental housing for lower- income seniors. The Archstone Le Club
apartment complex has a total of 370 rental units, of which 74 units are reserved for
lower income households. The project was funded through multi - family housing
bonds that were originally issued by the City of Moorpark. The bonds were
purchased by the California Statewide Community Development Authority and have
been refinanced. The bonds are not set to expire until 2029. Finally, the Villa Del
Arroyo Mobile Home Estates was recently purchased through issuance of bonds,
which require 20% of the units to be affordable to lower- income households.
Chart 2 -24: Inventory of Assisted Units
source: venture c:ounry Housing Authority, 2000,
Cali /omia Debt Advisory Commission, 2000.
Although none of the projects are set to expire within the 2000 to 2010 planning
period, the City has set forth a quantified objective to ensure that these units will
remain affordable for the longest period of time. The Housing Plan describes the
City's program for ensuring these units remain affordable to their targeted clients.
City of Moorpark 2 -22 Housing Element
W
n
CC 3
WO
Is NOW
Tafoya
Ventura County
Terrace
30
30
301 -br
Housing
—
Authority
Archstone Le
74
312
2 -br
Mortgage
Club
3 -br
Revenue Bond
2029
Villa Del
Arroyo
48
240
–
Mortgage
2021
Revenue Bond
source: venture c:ounry Housing Authority, 2000,
Cali /omia Debt Advisory Commission, 2000.
Although none of the projects are set to expire within the 2000 to 2010 planning
period, the City has set forth a quantified objective to ensure that these units will
remain affordable for the longest period of time. The Housing Plan describes the
City's program for ensuring these units remain affordable to their targeted clients.
City of Moorpark 2 -22 Housing Element
/I"
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
3. HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
The provision of adequate and affordable housing opportunities is an important goal of
Moorpark. However, a variety of factors can encourage or constrain the development,
maintenance, and improvement of the City's housing stock. These include market
mechanisms, government codes, market mechanisms, and physical and environmental
constraints. This section addresses these potential constraints.
A. Market Constraints
Land costs, construction costs, and market financing contribute to the cost of housing
and can potentially hinder the production of housing. Although many of these potential
constraints are driven by market conditions, jurisdictions have some leverage in
instituting policies and programs to remove or mitigate these constraints. This section
analyzes these constraints as well as the activities that a jurisdiction can undertake.
Chapter 5 of this Element sets forth additional programs to address constraints.
1. Development Costs
The costs of developing housing varies widely according to the type of home, with
multi - family housing generally less costly to construct than single family homes.
However, there is wide variation in costs within each construction type depending on
the size of unit and the number and quality of amenities provided. Land costs will
also vary considerably, depending on the location of the sites, whether the site is
vacant or has an existing use that must be removed.
According to the Construction Industry Research Board, the construction cost for a
typical new, single - family dwelling increased significantly over the past decade,
averaging $60 to $90 per square foot in 1999. Custom homes cost in the higher
range, while tract homes cost in the lower range. The average construction cost for
multi - family construction varies from $50 to $85 per square foot, with underground
parking or other amenities increasing the cost of construction.
City of Moorpark 3 -1 Housing Element
K0USING CONSTRAINTS
Home Financing
The availability of financing affects a person's ability to purchase or improve a home.
Home owners looking for opportunities to improve their home must consider the
interest rate (variable or fixed), the type of lender (conventional or government), as
well as their overall return on investment. Therefore, the availability of financing
affects a homeowner or landlord's decision to make investments in their home.
Availability of Financing
One measure of availability of financing can be found from analyzing lending data.
Under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), lending institutions are required
to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications for home purchases
and improvements. HMDA data typically has a two-year delay before the data is
released. Chart 3 -1 shows the percentage of loans that were "approved," "denied,"
and "other" loans that were withdrawn by the applicant or were incomplete.
Home Purchase Loans. During 1998, 988 households applied for market -rate
conventional home purchase (mortgage) loans in Moorpark. Private financial
institutions accounted for over 90% of all home purchase loans (Chart 3 -1). As is
typical in most communities, origination rates varied according to household income.
For instance, origination rates increased from 70% for lower income households, to
r.- 72% for moderate - income, to 77% for upper income households.
Chart 3 -1: Disposition of Home Loans
source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, 1998
1. Loans approved by the lender and accepted by the applicant.
2. Applications withdrawn, files closed for incompleteness, or applications approved for
a loan but not accepted by the applicant.
City of Moorpark 3 -2 Housing Element
�70
ry �-a
_R�X
vrfi':b1 2
Lower
156
70%
16%
14%
Wderate
277
72%
10%
18%
Upper
510
77%
9%
14%
N.A.
45
42%
11%
47%
Total
988
73%
11%
16%
source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, 1998
1. Loans approved by the lender and accepted by the applicant.
2. Applications withdrawn, files closed for incompleteness, or applications approved for
a loan but not accepted by the applicant.
City of Moorpark 3 -2 Housing Element
�70
ry �-a
_R�X
source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, 1998
1. Loans approved by the lender and accepted by the applicant.
2. Applications withdrawn, files closed for incompleteness, or applications approved for
a loan but not accepted by the applicant.
City of Moorpark 3 -2 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
r"
Home Improvement Loans: Compared to mortgage loans, there were far fewer
applications for home improvement loans, as is often the case in most jurisdictions.
Of the 117 applications, 100 were conventional home improvement loans, while 17
were government- assisted loans. Since household income is the major determinant
in qualifying for a loan, the origination rate for home improvement loans also
increased progressively with the income of the applicant. The overall origination rate
for conventional home improvement loans was 56 %, as shown in Chart 3 -1.
Comparison to Ventura County. In comparison to Ventura County, Moorpark has a
higher percentage of originated loans and a lower rate of denials. For conventional
home loans, the origination rate was 73% in Moorpark versus 69% in the County.
Similarly, the origination rate for conventional home improvement loans was higher
and the denial rate lower in Moorpark. In addition, the County had a higher
percentage of loans in the "other" category, which includes applications withdrawn,
files closed due to incompleteness, or applications approved but not accepted.
Chart 3 -2: Loan Disposition: Moorpark and Ventura County
Source: Home Mortgage Discksure Act (HMDA) data, 1998.
Interest Rates
Interest rates can also impact the ability to construct, purchase or improve a home.
For instance, consider the median home price in Moorpark was $253,500 in 1999.
Also assume a 10% down payment, 30 -year mortgage, and standard deductions for
utilities, property taxes, and home insurance. If the interest rate varies from 8% to
10 %, the annual income needed to qualify for a loan varies from $78,000 to $91,000.
Although interest rates are beyond local control, cities can provide downpayment
assistance to make homes more affordable to low and moderate income households.
City of Moorpark 3 -3 Housing Element
Jurl adictlo n '
w
Home,
Dlspostto
«,
RureFiasa
Improvement
city
73%
56%
Originated
County
69%
54%
City
11%
30%
Denied
County
11%
27%
Other
City
16%
14%
County
20%
19%
Source: Home Mortgage Discksure Act (HMDA) data, 1998.
Interest Rates
Interest rates can also impact the ability to construct, purchase or improve a home.
For instance, consider the median home price in Moorpark was $253,500 in 1999.
Also assume a 10% down payment, 30 -year mortgage, and standard deductions for
utilities, property taxes, and home insurance. If the interest rate varies from 8% to
10 %, the annual income needed to qualify for a loan varies from $78,000 to $91,000.
Although interest rates are beyond local control, cities can provide downpayment
assistance to make homes more affordable to low and moderate income households.
City of Moorpark 3 -3 Housing Element
r—
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
B. Government Constraints
Local policies and regulations can impact the price and availability of housing and in
particular, the provision of affordable housing. Land use controls, site improvement
requirements, fees and exactions, permit processing procedures, and other issues may
represent potential constraints to the maintenance, development and improvement of
housing. This section discusses potential governmental constraints in Moorpark.
1. Land Use Controls
The Land Use Element of Moorpark's General Plan sets forth policies for guiding
local development. These policies, together with existing zoning regulations,
establish the amount of land to be allocated for different uses. In Moorpark, over
54% of the acreage within the City is designated for residential use, with an
additional 11 % of the acreage designated as speck plan areas.
Chart 3 -3 below details the major land use categories and types of homes permitted.
The Zoning Code allows for a range of residential uses in different settings.
Residential uses are allowed in more agricultural settings, rural settings in the
hillsides, and in urban settings surrounding the downtown area.
%,nan[ Oro: memuenual Lana use
Open Space Open Space(O -S)
and
Agricultural Agricultural Exclusive (A -E)
Rural - Agricultural (R -A)
Rural Rural Exclusive (R -E)
Residential
Single - Family Estate (R -O)
Single - Family Res. (R -1)
Urban
Residential Two - Family Res. (R -2)
Residential Planned
Development (RPD)
Single- family detached homes
within a large open space area.
Single - family detached home within
a
area
Single- family homes on 1 acre lots
designed to maintain a rural settinf
nily homes on smaller lots
to maintain a rural settinv
Single - family hones or cluster
developments in a rural setting.
Attached/detached single - family
homes in a subdivision settina
Single family detached units, two
units, or one duplex per lot
Attached and detached single -
family and multi- family units
Source. Land Use Element 1992; Moorpark Zoning Code, 1998
City of Moorpark 3.4 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Specific Plan Areas
Moorpark has three Specific Plans areas: Hitch Ranch (SP -1), Moorpark Highlands
(SP -2), and the Downtown Specific Plan. These Specific Plans have been
designated to comprehensively address a variety of unique land uses (e.g.
topography, viewshed, and circulation) and provide focused planning and
development standards tailored to the unique characteristics or purpose of a
particular area. Chart 3-4 identifies the residential land uses for each Specific Plan.
Hitch Ranch Specific Plan: The Hitch Ranch Specific Plan (SP -1), in the northwest
quadrant of the City, consists of 404 acres, of which over half of the acreage is
planned for 415 to 605 residential units. The project contains four single - family
residential development areas, with lots ranging from 4,000 to 7,000 square feet and
an area for estate lots. The Specific Plan includes an affordable housing component
consisting of a very high- density residential area of 11 acres.with 100 housing units.
This project entered into the planning and environmental stage as of 2000.
Moorpark Highlands Specific Plan: The Moorpark Highlands Speck Plan,
located in the northern part of Moorpark, consists of 445 acres. Of the total acreage,
35% is designated for residential use. Approximately 570 single - family homes will be
built in this Specific Plan area and 25 of those will be affordable to very low, low and
moderate income households for a period of 30 years. The Specific Plan has been
.—, approved by the City Council and development implementation is underway.
Downtown Specific Plan: The Downtown Specific Plan contains High Street, Old
Town, several residential neighborhoods, and the downtown commercial area.
Within this area, residential zones permits up to 6 dwelling units per acre, while the
Residential Planned Development zone permits up to 20 units per acre under land
consolidation criteria. Housing development that has occurred in the Downtown
Specific Plan over the past number of years has consisted of infill housing projects,
including single - family residential, duplexes, and one senior housing project.
Chart 3-4: Specific Plan Residential Land Use Summary
• 'TMS,
ti :uw"�iriva�L� •
{.'�'` r.�
wp
{ 0Lii9adE•
y's^ 9d
_
•• ^ �'
4.7
Sources: Hitch Ranch, Specific Plan No. 1, 1999
Moorpark Highlands Specific Plan 1999
City of Moorpark 3 -5 Sowing Element
r
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
2. Residential Development Standards
Moorpark regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development
primarily through the Zoning Code. Zoning regulations are designed to protect and
promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents as well as implement the
policies of the City's General Plan. The Zoning Code also serves to preserve the
character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. Chart 3 -5 below summarizes the
most pertinent development standards of the non - Specific Plan areas of Moorpark.
Chart 3.5: Residential Development Standards
Development Standard.
General Plan Land Use Category
Agricultural
.'_Rural Residential r-
Urban Residential
O-S
AE
R -A
R-O - ' R E
R -t ,
:' R -2 ., R-P -0•
Building Standards
Density Range (du /ac)
1/4 1/10
1
1 -2
3-4
4-6
7 -12
12 -15(')
Min. Unit Size
n/a DAI
n/a
Mg
n/g
n/a
n/a
n/a
Max. Height
25' 25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
25'
35'
Lot Standards
Min. Lot Size (Acres)
40 10
1
1/2
1/4
1/6
1/14
(1)
Max. Lot coverage
n/a a/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Lot Dimensions
n/a n/@
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Building Setbacks
Min. Front yard
20' 20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
Min. Side yard
10' 10'
5'
5'
5'
5'
S'
5'
Min. Rear yard
15' 15'�
15'
15'
15'
15'
15'
20'
Park Standard
Local Standard
5 acres/per 1.000 People or 120% of appraised
value of land
Single Family Unit
0.018 acres Per dwelling
unit
Multi - Family Unit
0.100 acres per dwelling
unit
Parking Standards
Single Family
2 covered s ace in a
ara e
Multi - Family Units
2 covered spaces/unit one in
ar + y2 space/unit for
guests
Mobile Homes
2 covered s aces /unit + Y. space/unit
for guest parking
Source: City of Moorpark Zoning Code, 1998.
RPD permit required for any development that creates rive or more separate residential lots in
the R -A, R -E, R -0, R -1, and R -2 zones.
1. Density can be approved up to 30 units per acre per RPD permit.
Na: Residential development standard not specified in the Zoning Code
City of Moorpark 3 -6 Housing Element
f
t"
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Facilitating Affordability
City of Moorpark 3 -7 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
3. Provisions for a Variety of Housing Types
Housing element law specifies that jurisdictions must identify adequate sites to be
made available through appropriate zoning and development standards to
encourage the development of housing for all economic segments of the population.
Housing types include standard single - family and multi - family housing opportunities,
factory-built housing, mobile homes as well as housing to meet special housing
needs associated with shelters, transitional housing, and farm labor housing.
Chan: 3 -6: Housing Types Permitted in Residential Zones
Residential Us
041
A•E
'F--K-A;
Rural Residential
Urban Residential
R-O
R -E _
R -1
R -2'
R -P6
Residential Uses
Single - family
zc
zc
zc
zc
zc
zc
rpd`
Duplexes/Tri/Quad
zc
rpd•
Multi - family
rpd•
Mobile Homes
cup'
cup*
cup`
cup`
cup*
cup-
cup*
Second Units
ap
ap
ap
ap
ap
ap
ap
Group Housing
Boarding house
cup
cup`
cup-
cup`
cup*
Transitional Housing
cup'
cup'
cup'
cup.
cup*
Emergency Shelters
cup•
cup'
cup*
cup'
cup'
Farm Labor Housing
cup*
cup*
Special Need Housing
Affordable or Senior
rpd•`
rpd"
rpd'•
Small LCF (6 of less)
zc
zc
zc
zc
zc
zc
rpd`•
Large LCF (over 6)
cup*
cup'
cup*
cup*
cup*
Source: City of Moorpark Zoning Code, 1998.
Notes: • Planning Commission Aooroved• •• City Council Approved
ZC: zoning clearance; CUP: conditional use permit; and AP: administrative permit
City of Moorpark 3 -8 Housing Element
i
HOUSEKG CONSTRAINTS
Residential Uses Other than Single - Family Homes
In addition to single - family housing opportunities, the City of Moorpark also offers a
range of housing opportunities available to all economic segments of the community.
In particular, housing opportunities are available to persons earning lower incomes,
seniors, disabled persons, and other more vulnerable members of the community.
Multi - Family Housing: Moorpark's Zoning Code provides for multi - family housing in
R -2 zones and Residential Planned Development zones, which allow up to a density
of 30 dwelling units per acre (assuming a density bonus and additional incentives).
The provision of multi - family housing in Residential Planned Development zones
facilitates the availability of lower cost housing opportunities.
Second Units: Second units are allowed in all residential zoned lots that are 10,000
square feet or larger in size, pursuant to an administrative permit from the City.
However, the second unit must meet the minimum setbacks, lot coverage, height
restrictions, and other development standards for the primary residence unit. Since
1998, six second units have been approved in Moorpark.
Mobile Homes: Moorpark has 305 mobile homes within the community. Mobile
homes are permitted in all residential zones subject to a conditional use permit
(CUP) from the City Planning Commission. The Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization
Program limits space rent increases and the Hardship Waiver Program provides a
waiver for tenants if a space rent increase results in economic hardship.
Farmworker Housing: Farmworker housing is permitted, subject to a conditional
use permit, in five districts: Open Space, Agricultural Exclusive, Rural Agricultural,
Industrial Park, and Limited Industrial zones. In 1990, the City provided mortgage
assistance and reduced fees to facilitate the development of Villa Campesina, a 62-
unit, sweat equity project for local farmworkers and lower income residents.
Residential Care Facilities: Moorpark complies with the Lanterman Developmental
Disabilities Services Act by allowing, by right, State - authorized, certified, or licensed
family care homes, foster homes, or group homes serving six or fewer persons in all
residential zones. Facilities serving seven or more people are permitted in all
residential zones, subject to a conditional use permit from the Planning Commission.
Homeless Shelters and Transitional Housing: Emergency shelters and
transitional housing are part of the Ventura County regional continuum of care to
address the needs of the homeless population. The Moorpark Zoning Code treats
emergency homeless shelters and transitional housing as boarding homes and
permits them in most residential zone districts, subject to an approved CUP.
City of Moorpark 3 -9 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
4. Development Review Process.
Zone Clearance: The zone
clearance is applied to Proiects that
are allowed by right. The zone
clearance is used to ensure that the
without a public hearing.
Chart 3 -7: Development Review Process
Project
Submittal
Zone I I Admin. I I Planned or
Clearance Permit Conditional
Development
Design Design Design
Review Review Review
No Public Office Public
Hearing Hearing Hearing
2 -3 days t month 3 -6 months
Source: City of Moorpark, 2000.
City of Moorpark 3 -10 Housing Element
r-
t�
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Development Review Timeframes
State law requires that communities work toward improving the efficiency of their
building permit and review processes by providing "one -stop" processing, thereby
eliminating the unnecessary duplication of effort. The Permit Streamlining Act helped
reduce governmental delays by limiting permit processing time to one year and
requiring agencies to specify the information needed for an acceptable application.
Chart 3 -8 summarizes the approximate time frame for reviewing projects from pre -
application development review phase through a general plan amendment,
environmental review, and through public hearings if necessary.
Chart 3 -8: Development Review lime Frames
Permits & Review
Time Frame
Timeframe
Reason for Difference
Pre - Application Develop. Review
1 to 4 mos.
Complexity; special study needs
Variance
2 to 6 mos.
Complexity; level of review
Zone Clearance
Immediate —
3 days
Scale of project
General Plan Amend.
3 —12 mos.
I Complexity; level of review
Administrative Permit
1 month
Completeness of Application
Planned Development
3 to 6 mos.
Scale of projecUCompleteness
Subdivision Tract Map
6 —12 mos.
Environmental/design issues
Conditional Use Permit
6 -9 mos.
Scale of project; environmental
Environmental Review
6 -12 mos.
Scale — complexity of project
Public Hearing
7 -24 mos.
Complexity of project
Source: CRy of Moorpark, August 2000.
frame needed to review Projects depends on the location. Potential environmental
City of Moorpark 3 -11 Housing Element
HOUSIIQO CONSTRA M
S. RPD Process and Design Review
• Is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's general plan and
appropriate zoning chapter:
Properties.
txampies incluoe:
City of Moorpark 3 -12 Housing Element
W
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
6. Fees and Exactions
Moorpark collects fees and exactions from developments to cover the costs of
processing permits and providing the necessary services and infrastructure related to
new development. Fees are calculated based on the average cost of processing a
particular type of case. Chart 3 -9 summarizes planning, development, and other fees
charged for new residential development.
Chart 3 -9: Development Review Fees
Type of Fees
Fees
Single - Family
I Multi- Famlly
Planning Fees
Pre Screening for General Plan Amendment
$1,760
General Plan Amendment
$2,200
Residential Planned Development (SF or MF)
$2,200 plus $9.55 /unit
Tentative Tract Map
$2,728 plus $67 per lot or unit
Administrative Clearance (Minor Variance)
$264
Variance — Existing Single- family Residential
$440
Administrative Permit
$264
Conditional Use Permit— Residential Uses
$1,584
Zone Change
$2,464
Zoning Code Amendment
$1,760
Development Impact Fees
Fire Protection Facilities Fee
$233 per unit
$171 per unit
Police Facilities Fee
$677 per unit
$677 per unit
Calleguas Water District Fee
$1,351 per unit
$1,001 per unit
Water (Waterworks District #1)
N/A per unit
$635 per unit
Flood Control — Land Development Fee
$601 per unit
$601 per unit
Sewer Connection
$2,500 per unit
$2,000 per unit
Library Facilities Fee
$461 per unit
$298 per unit
School Fees
$3.59 per sq. ft.
$3.59 per sq. ft.
N/A = Not applicable
Source: City of Moorpark, March 2000.
Moorpark's development fees are considered typical for the Ventura County area.
The City Council has the authority to reduce or waive local fees on a case -by -case
basis. For affordable or senior housing, the City Council at its discretion may award
developers with incentives such as the waiving of fees and other concessions that
may result in identifiable cost reductions. For the development of Villa Campesina,
the City reduced development fees for Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation
in order to ensure the project's affordability to lower income households.
City of Moorpark 3 -13 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
7. Building Codes and Enforcement
A variety of building and safety codes, while adopted for the purposes of preserving
public health and safety, and ensuring the construction of safe and decent housing,
have the potential to increase the cost of housing construction or maintenance.
These include building codes, accessibility standards, specific codes to reduce
hazards, and other related ordinances. The following briefly highlight the impact of
these standards upon the maintenance and development of housing.
• Code Enforcement. The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for enforcing
regulations governing maintenance of all buildings and property. The City has
two full -time code enforcement officers. One officer focuses in central Moorpark,
where much of the older housing stock is located. The Division works in
conjunction with the rehabilitation program to identify homes that may benefit
from rehabilitation services. To facilitate correction of code violations, the Code
(r Enforcement staff refers property owners to the City's rehabilitation program.
City of Moorpark 3 -14 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
8. Infrastructure and Site Improvements
Adequate infrastructure and site improvements are important components of new
development. In order for residential development to not adversely impact the City's
service system levels, the City must ensure that various site improvements are
provided for new development and put in place ongoing capital improvement plans.
Several mechanisms have been put in place to ensure adequate infrastructure.
transportation improvements needed to serve multi - family developments
Site Improvements. Site improvements include water, sewer, circulation and
and facilities are required pursuant to developer agreement
Reouiring developers to construct site improvements and /or pay pro -rata shares
Taken together, the City has provisions in place to ensure that adequate regional
and site specific infrastructure, services, and public facilities will be in place to allow
development of housing commensurate with its regional housing need allocation,
Through a combination of developer agreements and fees, there will be adequate
infrastructure, facilities and services in place to address the 1998 -2005 RHNA.
City of Moorpark 3 -15 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
t�
9. Growth Management
Growth management has long been a concern in Ventura County. In 1999, the City
adopted the "SOAR" Initiative, the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources.
This Initiative originated from public concern that rapid urban encroachment over the
past decade was threatening agricultural, open space, watershed, sensitive
wetlands, and riparian areas vital to Ventura County. Voters thus passed an initiative
to direct future population growth into incorporated areas where infrastructure is in
place. This initiative amended the General Plan as of January 1998.
Until December 31, 2020, the City shall restrict urbanized uses to within the urban
restriction boundary (CURB), which is generally coterminous with the City's Sphere
of Influence. The City Council cannot grant or by inaction allow to be approved by
operation of law, any general plan amendment, rezoning, specific plan, subdivision
map, special use permit, building permit or other ministerial or discretionary
entitlement inconsistent with the General Plan and CURB line established by the
SOAR Initiative. Generally, the City Council may not amend the CURB, without voter
approval, unless specific procedures and purposes are followed.
If for any reason, sufficient land resources are not available to address the RHNA,
the SOAR Initiative still allows the City of Moorpark to satisfy its 1998 -2005 RHNA.
This is because pursuant to the SOAR Initiative, the City Council is expressly
authorized to amend the CURB line to comply with state law regarding the provision
of housing for all economic segments of the community. Thus, the City Council may
amend the CURB, provided that no more than 20 acres is brought within the CURB
for this purpose annually. Prior to this, the Council must make the following findings:
➢ the land is immediately adjacent to existing compatibly developed areas and
that adequate services have or will be provided for such development;
➢ the proposed development will address the highest priority need identified
(e.g., the provision of lower income housing to satisfy the RHNA); and
➢ there is no existing residentially land available within the CURB and it is not
reasonably feasible to redesignate land within the CURB for such purposes.
The SOAR Initiative is not expected to prevent the City of Moorpark from meeting its
RHNA requirements pursuant to State law. This is because of the following: (1) the
City has a large reserve of vacant land within its corporate limits; (2) the City makes
wide use of development agreements to require inclusionary units or in -lieu fees; and
(3) the SOAR has specific amendment procedures to accommodate the lower -
income affordability goals of the RHNA. Therefore, SOAR will not deter the City from
satisfying its obligations for affordable housing required by the 1998 -2005 RHNA.
City of Moorpark 3 -16 Housing Element
W
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
C. Environmental Constraints
Environmental constraints related to seismic activity, geology /topographical, flooding
potential, or other environmental issues can impact the cost associated with the
maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. This section briefly outlines
these constraints. A more detailed discussion is included in the City's Safety Element.
1. Fire Hazard Constraints. Building, wildland, and earthquake - induced fires
represent significant fire hazards in Moorpark and its Sphere of Influence. Fire
potential is typically greatest in the late summer months, when dry vegetation
combined with offshore dry Santa Ana winds coexist. The Ventura County Fire
District classifies areas within unincorporated Moorpark as a High Fire Hazard Area.
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention also classifies areas of
unincorporated Moorpark as having the potential for wild land fires.
2. Seismic Activity. The Moorpark Area is potentially subject to seismic hazards.
The southern part of Moorpark is crossed by the Simi /Santa Rosa Fault and is
designated an Alquist -Priolo Fault Zone. The northern portion of the city is crossed
by the Oak Ridge fault zone. Other local faults within five miles of the Moorpark Area
include the Santa Susana and San Cayetano as well as the San Andreas fault.
Faults with the area are capable of earthquakes with magnitudes up seven.
Seismic shaking can cause liquefaction, soil settlement, slope failure, deformation of
sidehill fills, ridgetop fissuring and shattering, and other hazards. Most of the
lowlands in the Moorpark area have a high liquefaction and /or settlement potential
because of the shallow ground water. The northern portion of the Moorpark Area of
Interest would be most vulnerable to seismically induced slope failure due to the
steep terrain and presence of weak sedimentary bedrock.
City of Moorpark 3 -17 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
3. Topographical and Geotechnical Constraints. The predominance of steep
hillsides and slopes in northern Moorpark present the threat of landslide activity. For
instance, landslide activity has been evident in parts of the Gabbert Canyon stream
area, a large slide complex south of Arroyo Las Posas, the south flank of Big
Mountain, the Arroyo Simi, and Las Posas Hills. Landslides could also impact
developments adjacent to the mountain front. Although the occurrence of landslides
is relatively infrequent, it nonetheless presents a constraint to development.
biology, and other unique conditions of the subiect area The City must sign off on
all documents to ensure that corn fiance is achieved.
4. Hydrological Constraints. Flooding is the primary hydrological constraint that
affects housing development within the City of Moorpark. As noted in the Safety
Element, the Moorpark Area is drained by a system of streams that are part of the
Calleguas Creek watershed. Calleguas Creek is locally referred to as the Arroyo
Simi. Most of the Little Simi Valley along and north of the Arroyo Simi is within the
500 -year floodplain. Floods that impact Moorpark are typically of shorter duration,
high peak volumes and high velocity. Damaging floods have occurred in the past
along the Calleguas Creek Drainage, which includes the Arroyo Simi.
The Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFD) controls the watercourses in the
Moorpark Area and regional flood control system. An extensive municipal storm
drain network operated by Moorpark serves the urbanized portions of the city. The
VCFD has constructed a levee along a segment of the Arroyo Simi and along a
segment of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The VCFD also maintains sophisticated
flood warning systems in critical flood hazard areas, such as Calleguas Creek.
Existing flood control structures provide a certain level of protection from
uncontrolled flooding, but significant deficiencies in infrastructure still exist.
City of Moorpark 3 -18 Housing Element
HOUSING CONSTRAINTS
Cost Impacts
• Hillside Grading: City officials estimate that grading and infrastructure
Although build no standards and review processes raise the cost of development
City of Moorpark 3 -19 Housing Element
9
i`
• _ l Q�e /- 1 /1_e� •_
r �
.%
cz
'W" .:�� +11.x._. �� /II=�•_J11' I�i��
ii1'It1�11' ''•'"
� •.IIIIIIt
iii 111.1.1J� � ,•ID's
Source: Earth Consultants Intemational
---- City Boundary
Landslide Constraints
_ Definite or probable landslide
Questionable landslide
Flooding Constraints
® Areas within 100 -year flood zone
® Areas with a less severe risk of flooding
(between 100- and 500 -year flood zones,
flooding with average depths of less than
one foot, contributing drainage area is
less than one square mile, and /or
protected by levee from the 100 -year flood)
Earthquake Fault Constraints
Fault considered active,
with the potential for
surface rupture
® Alquist- Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zone Boundary
Fault, solid where well
located, dashed where
approximate, dotted
where concealed
Indicates additional
uncertainty
Figure 1
North o t 2 nWm Environmental Constraints
City of Moorpark 3 -20 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
4. HOUSING RESOURCES
This section analyzes the resources available for the development, rehabilitation, and
preservation of housing in Moorpark. This includes an evaluation of the availability of
land resources, the City's ability to satisfy its share of the region's future housing needs,
the financial resources available to support the provision of affordable housing, and the
administrative resources available to assist in implementing the City's housing programs.
A. RHNA Compliance
State law requires cities to demonstrate that they encourage and facilitate housing
production commensurate with their share of the region's future growth from 1998 -2005.
The City's assigned share is called the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
Therefore, an important component of the Housing Element is the identification of
suitable sites to accommodate housing for each affordability level of the RHNA.
1. RHNA Requirement
As discussed in Chapter 2, the Southern California Association of Govemments and
Ventura Council of Government have assigned a portion of the region's future need
for housing to each jurisdiction in Ventura County. Moorpark's share of the region's
future housing need is 1,255 new housing units from January 1, 1998 to June 30,
f^ 2005. Moorpark's final RHNA allocation was also confirmed and finalized by the
Department of Housing and Community Development in December 2000.
The City's 1,255 unit housing allocation is divided into four affordability categories —
very low income, low income, moderate income, and upper income. The affordability
distribution of new units is derived from the household income distribution of
households in Moorpark in 1990 plus a fair share adjustment decided upon by
SCAG. Chart 4 -1 summarizes the City's regional housing needs allocation as
determined by SCAG and the Ventura Council of Governments. Chapter 2 provides
greater detail on the methodology used to calculate Moorpark's RHNA.
Chart 4 -1: Regional Housing Needs Share for Moorpark
no ES o
[�hor
f,{'M .
Very Low
50% or less of the CMFI
269
Low Income
51 % to 80% of the CMFI
155
Moderate
81 % to 120% of the CMFI
383
Upper Income
Over 120% of the CMFI
448
Total
1,255
Source: Southern California Association of Govemments, 2001.
City of Moorpark 4-1 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
Options for Compliance
State housing element law requires jurisdictions to demonstrate that "adequate sites"
will be made available over the planning period to facilitate and encourage a
sufficient level of new housing production. Jurisdictions must also demonstrate that
appropriate zoning and development standards, services and facilities will be in
place to facilitate and encourage housing commensurate with their share of the
region's housing needs (Government Code, Section 65583(c)(1)).
The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) allows jurisdictions
to count four types of credits toward meeting their RHNA allocation. These methods
and their applicability for Moorpark are described below and discussed later.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Actual Production. Jurisdictions could count the number of new units built
during the planning period of 1998 -2005 toward their RHNA. New housing
units include both those built and occupied (issued a certificate of occupancy)
since January 1, 1998.
2. Rehabilitation of Units. Under A13438, cities can count up to 25% of its
RHNA for the rehabilitation of qualified substandard units that would
otherwise be demolished. However, the stringent nature of the regulations
underpinning AB438 have, for practical purposes, made this option
impractical and too costly for the vast majority of jurisdictions in the region.
3. Preservation of Affordable Units. AB438 also authorizes jurisdictions to
count a portion of the affordable units which would otherwise revert to market
rents but are preserved through committed assistance from the jurisdiction.
However, since no project is currently at -risk of imminent conversion from
2000 through 2010, this option is not applicable for Moorpark.
4. Available Land for Development. HCD also allows cities to count potential
residential production on suitable sites within a community. To that end, the
Housing Element must inventory the amount of land suitable for residential
development, including vacant and underutilized sites, and analyze the
relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites.
City of Moorpark 4-2 Housing Element
rte'
HOUSING RESOURCES
2. Production Capacity on Residential Land
residential units that are being built on residential -zoned land and over
capacity on commercial land. This section details these oroduction credits.
Residential Land.
development projects ongoing in Moorpark.
Chart 4 -2: Housing Projects on Residential Zoned Land
Af(olydabiiftyggUni
on eht:
Source: City of Moorpark, January 2001.
1. In -lieu fees paid rather than construct on -site units.
2. Affordability of single family units based upon lot size
3. Project affordability under negotiation
4. Site in RDA project area. Multi- family projects anticipated
City of Moorpark 4-3 Housing Element
OWN'
Loyt
Mode
, Up
Total
RPD
Carlsberg
323
-0-
-0-
-0-
552
552
RPD -15u
Cabrillo EDC
7
4
11
44
-0-
59
RPD -12u
Far West
9
'
7
67
-0-
74
R -1
Asadurian
1.2
-0-
1
7
-0-
8
RE
Peach Hill
2
-0-
-0-
-0-
10
10
SP -2
Specific Plan 2
445
'
25
102
435
562
RPD -1.6u
_ Toll Brothers
399
-0-
-0 -
-0-
216
216
AE
Hitch Ranch'')
202
100(0)
200
305
605
RE -sac
Suncal(')
72
10
-0-
97
107
RE -sac
Westpointe'31
1 349
25
-0-
225
250
Summary
3tatuaw
wSP
YxLoMr
S Jlav
aLov
ytod
Upper+
Tofai:
Approved
4
44
220
1,213
1,481
Pending
135
200
627
962
Total
183
420
1,840
2,443
Source: City of Moorpark, January 2001.
1. In -lieu fees paid rather than construct on -site units.
2. Affordability of single family units based upon lot size
3. Project affordability under negotiation
4. Site in RDA project area. Multi- family projects anticipated
City of Moorpark 4-3 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
Commercial Land.
for a 176 -unit tax credit senior housing oroiect with at least 50% dedicated to low -
income units.
Chart 4 -3: Housing Projects BuiltlPlanned on Commercial Land
Zon
-. .N
M
,UP Y , v,
Sites Converted to Residential
CPD
Pacific
32-1
fees
22
1 -0-
1 273
295
CPD
Pacific
7
1 -0-
-0-
1 -0-
37
37
CPD
Archstone
18
25
1 37
1 250
-0-
312
Pending Projects
C -2
LT Develop?
12
50
-0-
114
-0-
164
CPD")
Pending3
6.8
-0-
30
71
-0-
101
C -2
USA Properties'
9.5
66
66
44
-0-
176
Additional Conversion Potential
CPD
No projects 1 25.3
pending 4.3
44
49
307
-0-
400
CP0121
8
8
54
-0-
70
.Summarja$tatus
V ",. ow
"tour.
` -Mod'
,Upper
,TotafTM
Approved
25
59
250
310
654
Pending
116
96
229
Sites
52
57
361
notes:
1. Underutilized site has R.V. storage.
2. Underutilized site with a greenhouse.
3. Projects approved for submittal of general plan amendment
City of Moorpark 4.4 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
Other Production Potential.
Downtown Specific Plan. In 1998, the City developed a Downtown Specific Plan to
Second Units. Second units are attached or detached dwellinq units on the same lot
Replacement Housing. The Ci
currently has 2 mobile home parks.
One park, Moorpark Mobile Home
Park, has a total of 28 units priced
at rents affordable to lower income
households. In recent Years, the
Park has experienced disinvest-
ment, having been cited numerous
times by H.C.D. Citations have
been issued for a range of health
and safety issues, including
building, electrical, mechanical,
affordability levels.
Chart 4-4: Other Potential Development
1 City of Moorpark, Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan, October 1998, p. 51.
City of Moorpark 4-5 Housing Element
on
s
w
Specific Plan
Area
7.55
-0-
20
100
Second Unit
Potential
n.a.
6
6
0
MObilehome
n.a.
28
0
0
Replacement
Totals
34
26
100
1 City of Moorpark, Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan, October 1998, p. 51.
City of Moorpark 4-5 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
f
3. Summary of Cedits toward the RHNA
Chart 4 -5: Summary of Efforts to Address the RHNA
Notations:
1. Includes approved projects from Chart 4 -2 or Chart 4 -3
2. Includes pending multi- family projects from Chart 4-3.
3. Includes site conversion potential on Chart 4 -3.
4. Includes projects on Chart 44, excluding Downtown Specific Plan.
5. Includes pending projects on Chart 4 -2
City of Moorpark 46 Housing Element
Atf
rdilGi
:ave
Y
- SF Units Built /Approved on
Residentially -Zoned Land �"
1,213
220
44
4
9
- MF Units Built(Approved on
(')
310
250
59
25
Commercial -Zoned Land
MF Units Pending Approval on
Commercial -Zoned Land (2)
-0-
229
96
116
. pow
_ iFli
-0-
-0-
-0-
124
MF Unit Site Capacity on
Commercial -Zoned Land (3)
-0-
361
57
52
w
Second Unit Development and
Mobile home Replacement I'I
-0-
-0-
12
34
v
- Other Pending Projects(s)
627
200
135
Uri et N'eed"17 2005 n
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
Notations:
1. Includes approved projects from Chart 4 -2 or Chart 4 -3
2. Includes pending multi- family projects from Chart 4-3.
3. Includes site conversion potential on Chart 4 -3.
4. Includes projects on Chart 44, excluding Downtown Specific Plan.
5. Includes pending projects on Chart 4 -2
City of Moorpark 46 Housing Element
le—'
B. Financial Resources
HOUSING RESOURCES
Moorpark has access to a variety of existing and potential funding sources for affordable
housing activities. They include programs from local, state, federal as well as private
resources. This section describes the three most significant housing funding sources
currently used in Moorpark — County Community Development Block Grant funds and
City Redevelopment Set -Aside funds. Chart 4 -6 summarizes these and other funding
available to support Moorpark's housing programs.
1. Redevelopment Set -Aside Funds
State law requires Moorpark's Redevelopment Agency to set -aside 20% of all tax
increment revenue generated from redevelopment projects for affordable housing.
The City's 20% set -aside funds must be used for activities that increase, improve, or
preserve the supply of affordable housing within the community. As of FY1997-
1998, the City had an unencumbered balance of $1.2 million. Planned expenditures
include: $300,000 in rehabilitation loans, $150,000 in mobile home repairs, $140,000
in first -time homebuyers, and $610,000 in new construction.
2. In -Lieu Fees & the Housing Trust Fund
Since 1997, the City of Moorpark has collected in -lieu fees from developers for the
purposes of providing affordable housing pursuant to defined development
agreements. For example, a developer was required to provide 15 housing units
affordable to very low income households paid the City an in lieu fee of
approximately $900,000 for the 15 very-low income units ($60,000 per unit). The
revenue collected from developers is then placed in the Housing Trust Fund, which is
used for the provision and /or maintenance of affordable housing in Moorpark. Over
the planning period, the City can expect a total of $4 to $5 million in in lieu fees.
3. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
HUD provides funds to local governments for a range of community development
activities. The eligible range of activities include, but are not limited to, the following:
acquisition and/or disposition of real estate or property, public facilities and
improvements, relocation, rehabilitation and construction (under certain limitations) of
housing, home ownership assistance, and also clearance activities. In addition,
these funds can be used to acquire or subsidize at -risk units. Since the City is not a
HUD entitled jurisdiction, Moorpark receives its CDBG allocation from the County of
Ventura rather than HUD. Moorpark receives $195,000 annually in funding for
housing and community development activities from the County CDBG program.
City of Moorpark 47 Housing Element
r�
i�
HOUSING RESOURCES
Chart 4-6: Financial Resources for Housing Activities
Program Name
Description
Eligible Activities
1. Federal Programs
Community
Grants awarded to the Ventura County
Acquisition
Development Block
from HUD. The City receives funds on a
Rehabilitation
Grant (CDBG)
formula basis for housing and community
development activities.
Home Buyer Assistance
• Economic Development
• Homeless Assistance
• Public Services
HOME
Grants awarded to the Ventura County
• Acquisition
from HUD. The City can apply for funding
. Rehabilitation
for specific housing projects.
• Home Buyer Assistance
• Rental Assistance
Section 8
Rental assistance payments to owners of
Rental Assistance
Rental Assistance
private market rate units on behalf of very
low income tenants.
Program
Section 202
Grants to non - profit developers of
Acquisition
supportive housing for the elderly.
. Rehabilitation
• New Construction
Section 811
Grants to non -profit developers of
• Acquisition
supportive housing for persons with
Rehabilitation
disabilities, including group homes,
independent living facilities and
New Construction
intermediate care facilities.
Rental Assistance
Section 203(k)
When rehabilitation is involved, a lender
Land Acquisition
typically requires the improvements to be
Rehabilitation
finished before a mortgage is made. This
program provides a long -term, low interest
Relocation of Unit
loan at fixed rate to finance acquisition and
. Refinance Existing
rehabilitation of the property.
Indebtedness
Section 108 Loan
Provides loan guarantee to CDBG
Acquisition
entitlement jurisdictions for pursuing large
. Rehabilitation
capital improvement projects. Maximum
loan amount can be up to five times the
• Home Buyer Assistance
jurisdiction's most recent annual allocation.
• Economic Development
Maximum loan term is 20 years.
. Homeless Assistance
• Public Services
Mortgage Credit
Income tax credits available to first -time
Home Buyer Assistance
Certificate Program
homebuyers to buy new or existing single -
family housing. Local agencies (County)
make certificates available.
Low Income
Tax credits are available to persons and
Housing Tax Credit
corporations that invest in low- income
.Construction of Housing
(LIHTC)
rental housing. Proceeds from the sale
are typically used to create housing.
City of Moorpark 48 Housing Element
r_
I' • 1 tae , • 1 .
Chart 46: Financial Resources for Housing Activities
Program Name
Description
Eligible Activities
Farm Labor
Capital financing for farmworker housing.
Purchase
Housing Loan and
Loans are for 33 years at 1 % interest.
Development
P
Grant
Housing grants may cover up to 90% of
the development costs of housing.
Improvement
• Rehabilitation
2. State Programs
Proposition 1A
Potential buyers or tenants of affordable
Downpayment Assistance
housing projects are eligible to receive
Rental Assistance
downpayment assistance or rent subsidies
at amounts equivalent to the school fees
paid by the housing developer.
Multi-Family
Deferred payment loans for new
New Construction
Housing Program
construction, rehabilitation and
Rehabilitation
(MHP)
preservation of rental housing.
• Preservation
California Housing
Below market rate financing offered to
New Construction
Finance Agency
builders and developers of multiple - family
Rehabilitation
(CHFA) Rental
and elderly rental housing. Tax exempt
Housing Programs
bonds provide below- market mortgages.
Acquisition of Properties
from 20 to 150 units
California Housing
CHFA sells tax - exempt bonds to make
Homebuyer Assistance
Finance Agency
below market loans to 13%me homebuyers.
Home Mortgage
Program operates through participating
Purchase Program
lenders who originate loans for CHFA.
California Housing
Low interest loans for the rehabilitation of
Rehabilitation
Rehab Program -
substandard homes owned and occupied
Repair of Code Violations,
Owner Component
by lower- income households. City and
Accessibility Improvements,
(CHRP)
non - profits sponsor rehabilitation projects.
Room Additions, etc.
Supportive Housing/
Funding for housing and services for
Supportive Housing
Minors Leaving
mentally ill, disabled and persons needing
Foster Care
support services to live independently.
Foster Care
California
Provides matching grants to assist
Land Acquisition
Farmworker
development of various types of housing
• Site Development
Housing Grant
(renter - and owner - occupied) projects for
. Construction
Program
agricultural worker households.
Rehabilitation
3. Local Programs
Redevelopment
State law requires that 20 percent of
• Acquisition
Housing Fund
Redevelopment Agency funds be set aside
• Rehabilitation
for a wide range of affordable housing
activities governed by State law.
New Construction
Tax Exempt
The City can support low- income housing
New Construction
Housing Revenue
by issuing housing mortgage revenue
Rehabilitation
Bond
bonds requiring the developer to lease a
fixed percentage of the units to low income
Acquisition
q
families at specified rental rates.
City of Moorpark 49 Homing Element
N
HOUSIMG RESOURCES
Chart 4-6: Financial Resources for Housing Activities
Program Name
Description
Eligible Activities
In -lieu Fees
The City's requires developers to set -aside
New Construction
a portion of units affordable to lower-
• Rehabilitation
income households or pay an in -lieu fee.
These monies are earmarked to support
the construction of new affordable housing
4. Private Resources/Financing Programs
Federal National
Fixed rate mortgages issued by private
Home Buyer Assistance
Mortgage
mortgage insurers.
Association (Fannie
Mae)
Mortgages which fund the purchase and
Home Buyer Assistance
rehabilitation of a home.
• Rehabilitation
Low Down- Payment Mortgages for Single-
Home Buyer Assistance
Family Homes in under served low -
income and minority cities.
Savings
Pooling process to fund loans for
New construction of rentals,
Association
affordable ownership and rental housing
cooperatives, self help
Mortgage
projects. Non - profit and for profit
housing, homeless shelters,
Company Inc.
developers contact member institutions.
and group homes
California
Non - profit mortgage banking consortium
New Construction
Community
designed to provide long tens debt
Rehabilitation
Reinvestment
financing for affordable multi- family rental
Corporation
housing. Non -profit and for profit
• Acquisition
(CCRC)
developers contact member banks.
Federal Home
Direct Subsidies to non -profit and for profit
New Construction
Loan Bank
developers and public agencies for
Affordable Housing
affordable low income ownership and
Program
rental projects.
Freddie Mac
Home Works - Provides 10 and 2n°
Home Buyer Assistance
mortgages that include rehabilitation loan.
combined with
City provides gap financing for
Rehabilitation
rehabilitation component. Households
earning up to 80% MFI qualify.
In terms of funds from the State of California to support affordable housing, the Governor
in 1999 signed the largest housing budget in the State's history for about $500 million.
The most heavily funded programs are as follows: Rental Housing ($177 million),
Community Amenities /Development Incentives ($110 million), Ownership Housing ($100
million), Farm Worker Housing ($43 million), Emergency Housing Assistance ($32
million), and Supportive Housing /Minors Leaving Foster Care ($25 million). These
sources may provide additional monies to support housing activities in Moorpark.
City of Moorpark 410 Housing Element
HOUSING RESOURCES
C. Administrative Resources
Described below are public and non - profit agencies that can serve as resources in the
implementation of housing activities in Moorpark. These agencies play an important role
in meeting the housing needs of the City. In particular, they are critical in the production
of affordable housing and the preservation of at -risk housing units in Moorpark.
Moorpark Community Development Department. The Department of Community
Development is responsible for coordinating, processing, reviewing, and inspecting
all applications for new development within the City, providing environmental review
and public information. The Department coordinates project review, reviews
applications, and processes affordable housing entitlement requests.
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency: The primary mission of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency is to encourage new development, provide housing,
eliminate blight, increase employment opportunities within the community, and
generally improve the economic base of the City. The Agency is responsible for low
and moderate housing rehabilitation and new construction, economic development
within the community, and retaining existing businesses. In addition, the Agency is
manages Agency -owned properties and buying and selling land for development.
Ventura County Housing Authority. The Housing Authority provides low rent
public housing, Section 8 rental subsidies to low income families and seniors, and
rehabilitation loans and homeownership assistance to lower income households.
The Housing Authority provides Section 8 rental assistance to 91 residents and
operates Tafoya Terrace, a 30 -unit affordable senior apartment project in Moorpark.
Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC): The Cabrillo Economic
Development Corporation (CEDC) is an active developer of single - family homes,
cooperative housing, rental projects throughout Ventura County. CEDC was
involved in constructing the 62 -unit Villa Campesina project in Moorpark and is
involved in the 59 -unit Mountain View project. CEDC also has construction, property
management, home ownership, counseling, and community building divisions.
Mercy Charities Housing California: Mercy Charities Housing California is a
statewide affordable housing developer who places an emphasis on rental
developments. Mercy contracts for its construction, has its own management
divisions, and emphasizes the provision of various services for its residents. Mercy
Charities have developed a number of projects in the Oxnard area.
Many Mansions, Inc.: Many Mansions is a non - profit housing and community
development organization founded in 1979 to promote and provide safe, well -
managed housing to limited income residents in Ventura County. Many Mansions
develops, owns, and self- manages special needs and permanent affordable housing.
City of Moorpark 411 Housing Element
tom,
HOUSING RESOURCES
D. Opportunities for Energy Conservation
Utility - related costs can impact the affordability of housing in Southern California.
However, Title 24 of the California Administrative Code sets forth mandatory energy
standards for new development, and requires adoption of an "energy budget." In turn,
the home building industry must comply with these standards while localities are
responsive for enforcing the energy conservation regulations.
The following are among the alternative ways to meet these energy standards.
Alternative 1 is the passive solar approach, which requires proper solar orientation,
appropriate levels of thermal mass, south facing windows, and moderate insulation
levels. Alternative 2 generally requires higher levels of insulation than Alternative 1, but
has no thermal mass or window orientation requirements. Finally, Alternative 3 is also
without passive solar design but requires active solar water heating in exchange for less
stringent insulation and /or glazing requirements.
Additional energy conservation measures are: (1) locating the home on the northern
portion of the sunniest portion of the site; (2) designing the structure to admit the
maximum amount of sunlight into the building and to reduce exposure to extreme
weather; (3) locating indoor areas of maximum usage along the south face of the
building and placing corridors, closets, laundry rooms, power core, and garages along
the north face; and (4) making the main entrance a small enclosed space that creates an
air lock between the building and its exterior; orienting the entrance away from winds; or
using a windbreak to reduce the wind velocity against the entrance.
Utility companies serving Moorpark offer programs to promote the efficient use of energy
and assist lower income customers. The programs are discussed below.
Southern California Edison Programs. Edison offers a variety of energy conservation
services under the Low Income Energy Efficiency programs (LIEE), which help qualified
homeowners and renters conserve energy and control electricity costs. Eligible
customers receive services from local community agencies and licensed contractors
working with Edison. Services include weatherization, efficient lighting and cooling,
refrigerator replacement, and energy education. In addition, Edison participates in the
California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) program which provides a 15 percent
discount on electric bills for low- income customers.
Southern California Gas Programs. Southern California Gas Company offers two
direct assistance programs to limited income customers: 1) a no -cost weatherization
(such as attic insulation and water blankets), and 2) a no -cost furnace repair and
replacement service. The Gas Company also participates in the State CARE program,
providing low- income customers with a discount on the gas bills.
City of Moorpark 412 Housing Element
r
HOUSING PLAN
5. HOUSING PLAN
Sections 2 to 4 establish the housing needs, constraints, and resources in Moorpark.
This section, the Housing Plan, evaluates the City's accomplishments from the 1989
Housing Element and sets forth the City's goals, policies, programs, and quantified
objectives to address the identified housing needs in Moorpark from 2000 to 2005.
A. Evaluation of Past Accomplishments
As part of the Housing Element, cities must periodically review the appropriateness,
effectiveness, and progress in implementing the programs in the housing element.
These results should be quantified wherever possible and qualitative where necessary.
This section evaluates the accomplishments since the last Housing Element was
completed as the basis for developing appropriate policy and program responses.
1. Housing Maintenance and Improvement
The 1989 Housing Element set forth programs to address the maintenance,
improvement, and conservation of housing. Specifically, the Element proposed
continued implementation of the code enforcement, housing rehabilitation loan,
capital improvement programs, and redevelopment implementation plan. These
programs were designed to maintain the quality of housing and neighborhoods,
identify problem structures, and provide rehabilitation assistance where feasible.
Over the planning period, the City has implemented a code enforcement program to
maintain the quality of existing structures while identifying more problematic buildings
for rehabilitation or demolition. On a wider scale, the City implements a larger
Redevelopment Plan to identify under -served areas of the community which
experience dilapidated housing, deteriorating infrastructure, and other issues
contributing to blight. These are ongoing programs with no specific objectives.
In 1994, the City began its rehabilitation program for lower income owner - occupied
properties in the Redevelopment Project Area. As shown later, the City's owner-
occupied rehabilitation programs were largely successful in exceeding its goal. The
renter - occupied housing rehabilitation program fell far short of its goal, however, the
City's apartment stock is in relatively excellent condition. The vast majority of poorer
quality housing is in older single - family neighborhoods in downtown.
The City's prior menu of programs will continue to be implemented throughout the
remainder of the housing element planning period. In 1998, the City Council adopted
a Downtown Specific Plan and incentives for the consolidation of lots, where
desirable, to facilitate transition of suitable underutilized sites for multi - family housing
while stabilizing established single - family neighborhoods. Information on this
program is included in the Program section of this Element.
City of Moorpark 5 -1 Housing Element
HOUSING PLAN
r"0�
2. Housing Production
The RHNA assigned Moorpark a construction need of 2,741 homes from 1989 to
1994. Of that total, 35 % of the units were targeted to lower income households and
65% to moderate and upper income households. The City relied primarily on market
production to address the moderate -upper income requirement. However, to
encourage the production of affordable housing, the City adopted a density bonus
and second unit program as well as adopted a Redevelopment Plan.
Progress in meeting the specified production objectives has been mixed. With
respect to production, the housing stock increased by 1,181 new homes. Affordability
of the new units can be inferred by the type of unit constructed and the affordability
matrix presented in Chart 2 -21. From 1989 through 1997, 833 units were single -
family homes, affordable to upper income households. Another 222 units of mobile
homes and condominiums/townhomes and 126 apartments were built. Given current
prices, the majority were affordable to moderate - income households.
Several factors were responsible for the shortfall in housing production. First, the
RHNA targets were based upon a projection of historical growth rates that were
artificially inflated by continuing federal tax credits, a continuing strong and rapidly
inflating housing market, and over - optimistic employment projections. Following the
1989 RHNA, however, the Southland was affected by a prolonged and severe
economic recession, which subsequently depressed the underlying consumer
demand for new housing.
Beginning in 1997, the housing market in Ventura County began to rebound. In an
effort to leverage new housing demand, the City began to use development
agreements to ensure that a portion of new construction be set -aside for affordable
housing. The City established a 10 0/o/15% inclusionary goal citywide and in the
redevelopment area. For development in the hillside areas of Moorpark where
inclusionary units are financially infeasible, the City began collecting in -lieu fees to
deposit in a Housing Trust Fund.
Strong expansion of the housing market is expected to add to the effectiveness of
existing City efforts. Programs and policies contained in the Redevelopment Plan,
the Downtown Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code (e.g. density bonus, second
units), which were less effective during the slower housing market, are expected to
lead to more affordable development in Moorpark. As shown in Chapter 4, the City
has already received $3.8 million in in -lieu fees described in Chapter 4.
The present menu of programs coupled with a strong economy suggest that housing
production, including affordable housing, will be significant through 2005. However,
this Housing Element will propose the following prioritization of in -lieu fee use to
ensure that the RHNA can be achieved: 1" priority — production of affordable
housing; 2nd priority — subsidy of affordable housing; 3d priority — housing
rehabilitation; and 4d' priority -- housing assistance. Details on this program are
shown later in this chapter.
City of Moorpark 5 -2 Housing Element
f
HOUSING PLAN
3. Housing Assistance
As part of the Housing Production goals specified earlier, Moorpark also set forth to
achieve other non - production housing assistance goals to ensure that lower- income
households have greater access to rental and homeownership opportunities. This
overall goal was to be achieved through the following four major programs: (1)
regulatory and financial assistance; (2) renter and homeowner assistance; (3) mobile
home rent stabilization; and (4) assistance for special needs households.
With respect to providing regulatory and financial assistance, the City is actively
involved in assisting nonprofit organizations build affordable housing. During the
1983 RHNA cycle a 30 -unit public housing project, Tafoya Terrace, was built. During
the 1989 -1994 RHNA, the 62 -unit Villa Campesina project was built. In the present
2000 -2005 RHNA, the Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation is building
another affordable housing project in Moorpark with city financial assistance.
Direct assistance was also provided to low and moderate income households. Over
the planning period, the City negotiated with HUD to increase the allocation of
Section 8 certificates /vouchers by a magnitude of fourfold. In an effort to assist low
and moderate income households transition to homeowners, the City joined the
Mortgage Credit Certificate Program in 1997 and became a member in the Fresh
Rate Program in 1999. Already, five households have been assisted in these new
homeownership programs.
In order to preserve an important source of lower cost housing, Moorpark continued
implementation of the Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization Program. Even with the
sale of the largest mobile home park in May 2000, the owning non - profit organization
agreed to continue both the rent control program and the Hardship Waiver Program
to waive rent increases for households. In addition, the agreement stipulated that at
least 20% of all the spaces must be reserved for low income households and of
those half must have rents affordable to very low income households.
Moorpark also provides assistance to its special needs populations. The Section 8
Rental Assistance program has provided over 90 vouchers and certificates to very
low income seniors and families, well above the initial goal of 19. The City has
supported the development of residential care facilities for seniors and the disabled
and recently approved a facility for Alzheimer's patients in 1999. To address the
needs of very low income residents and those at risk of becoming homeless, the City
has funded Catholic Charities to provide shelter referral, social services, food and
clothing, information, eviction services and legal assistance. To effectively address
the needs of the homeless, the City continues to participate as a member of the
Ventura Council of Government's Standing Committee on Homelessness.
City of Moorpark 5 -3 Housing Element
ON
rte'
4. Removal of Governmental Constraints
The City proposed active involvement, to
governmental constraints to the development,
housing. The 1989 Housing Element proposed
as needed to address the RHNA as well as
encouraging higher density developments in
Moreover, the City would continue to review de,
standards, and design criteria.
HOUSING PLAN
the extent feasible, in mitigating
maintenance, and improvement of
that the City would revise densities
tudy the feasibility and potential of
the downtown where appropriate.
ielopment procedures, development
In 1998, the City Council adopted the Downtown Specific Plan as part of a long -term
strategy to revitalize the downtown core of the community. The Plan is designed to
encourage a mix of commercial uses and appropriate higher density residential uses
to support the commercial areas. To spur redevelopment, the Plan allows for lot
consolidation coupled with a range of higher densities at certain sites, which may
foster the development of multi - family housing. In addition, the Plan encourages infill
housing development, which has resulted in 31 infill units having been developed.
In order to ensure that site development standards do not constrain the production of
housing in Moorpark, the City conducted a review of site development standards and
design and development criteria. The City is also currently preparing a development
fee study and cost management review to compare housing fees and costs with
those of surrounding cities. This study will ensure that fees and exactions recover the
costs of services provided, and remain competitive with surrounding communities.
S. Fair Housing
Lastly, the City implemented programs designed to reduce governmental constraints
to the production, maintenance and improvement of housing for all economic
segments of the community as well as ensure fair and equal housing opportunities
for residents. Through its involvement and support, the City has helped ensure that
all residents, regardless of their status, enjoy the fair and equal opportunity to secure
housing that is best suited to their lifestyle needs and income levels, without fear of
discrimination.
The City continued its active support of fair housing and related services for
Moorpark residents. In June 2000, the City participated in the Ventura County
Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and the City Council adopted
the findings. With respect to its larger fair housing program, Moorpark participated in
the Ventura County Fair Housing Council (VCFHC) operated by the Fair Housing
Institute. Support was also provided to Catholic Charities to handle eviction
prevention services, tenant assistance, counseling, referrals, homeless services, as
well as basic food and clothing.
City of Moorpark 5 -4 Housing Element
r-'
Chart 5-1: Past Accomplishments
i�
HOUSING PLAN
Program Type
Activity
1989 Housing Element
Objective
Progress
Rehabilitate owner- occupied housing
17
27
Residential
Rehabilitation
Provide home repair rebates for owners/renters
15
—
Rehabilitate rental housing
6
—
Housing Evaluation
Evaluate housing in need of rehabilitation
8
27
Capital
Address areas requiring capital improvements to
Ongoing
Ongoing
Improvements
encourage residential development
Code Enforcement
Improve quality of neighborhoods
Ongoing
Ongoing
Replacement Plan
Develop replacement plan for Rehab program
Ongoing
—
Affordable Housing
Develop affordable housing
113 units
348 units
Density Bonus
Offer density bonuses
846 units
None
Affordable Housing
Promote development of affordable housing and
Ongoing
Ongoing
Committee
affordable housing programs
Manufactured &
Explore manufactured housing and self -build
113 units
Determined
Self -Build Projects
projects to cut production costs
infeasible.
Rental Assistance
Section 8 vouchers/certificates
19
91
Redevelopment
Plan
Adopt Redevelopment Plan
Adopt
Adopted
Mixed Use
Study feasibility of mixed use development in
Ongoing
Downtown
Development
the downtown area
SP adopted
Infill Development
Promote infill housing through identification of
400 units
32 units
vacant or underutilized parcels
Fast Track Permit
Investigate fast track permit processing for low
Implement
Implemented
Processing
and moderate income housing projects
Development
Eliminate unnecessary conditions of approval
Ongoing
Review
Standards Review
that add to development costs
completed
General Plan and
Review Land Use Element & Zoning for incon-
Zoning Review
sistencies & encourage high density
Ongoing
Ongoing
development
/Housing
/Emplooyy Employment
Analyze employment trends and promote jobs -
Ongoing
Ongoing
Analysis
housing balance
Participated
Equal Housing
Promote equal housing opportunity
Ongoing
in 2000 -2005
Opportunity
County AI
Review housing counseling programs
Ongoing
Ongoing
Homeless Shelter
Support Ventura County Homeless Revolving
Support
homeless
Program
Loan Fund and work with County to identify
Ongoing
prevention
shelter sites
services
City of Moorpark 5 -5 Housia` Element
HOUSING PLAN
B. Goals and Policies
This section of the Housing Element contains a brief overview of the key issues from the
Needs Assessment as well as the goals and policies that Moorpark intends to implement
to address these housing needs. In addressing the City's housing needs, the City's
overall community goals are as follows:
➢ Adequate provision of decent, safe and affordable housing for residents without
regard to race, age, sex, marital status, ethnicity, or other arbitrary considerations.
➢ Adequate provision of housing opportunities by type, tenure, and location with
particular attention to the provision of housing for special needs groups.
➢ Encourage growth through the identification of suitable parcels for residential
development, changes in land use patterns, and appropriate recycling of land.
➢ Develop a balanced community accessible to employment, transportation,
shopping, medical services, and governmental agencies among others.
Within the aforementioned general framework, the City has developed the following
goals and policies to encourage the preservation, production, maintenance, and
improvement of housing within the Moorpark community.
1. Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
Housing and neighborhood conservation are important to maintaining and improving
quality of life. While the majority of housing in Moorpark is relatively new, some of the
older residential neighborhoods in the downtown shows signs of deterioration. Efforts to
improve and revitalize housing must not only address existing conditions, but also focus
on preventive repairs to maintain the quality of the housing stock. The policies listed
below address the issue of housing and neighborhood conservation.
GOAL 1.0: Assure the quality, safety, and habitability of existing housing and
the continued high quality of residential neighborhoods.
Policy 1.1 Continue to monitor and enforce building and property maintenance code
standards in residential neighborhoods.
Policy 1.2 Continue to provide City services designed to maintain the quality of the
housing stock and the neighborhoods.
Policy 1.3 Promote increased awareness among property owners and residents of
the importance of property maintenance to long -term housing quality.
Policy 1.4 Continue to promote the repair, revitalization, and rehabilitation of
residential structures which have fallen into disrepair.
Policy 1.5 Support the preservation and maintenance of historically and
%1 architecturally significant buildings and neighborhoods.
City of Moorpark 5 -6 Housing Element
HOUSING (PLAN
2. Adequate Residential Sites
The Regional Housing Needs Assessment addresses the need for decent, adequate,
and affordable housing to accommodate existing and future housing needs induced from
regional growth. In order to further these goals, Moorpark is committed to assisting in
the development of adequate housing that is affordable to all economic segments of the
population through the following goals and policies:
GOAL 2: Provide residential sites through land use, zoning and specific plan
designations to provide a range of housing opportunities.
Policy 2.1 Identify adequate sites which will be made available and zoned at the
appropriate densities, to facilitate goals set forth in the 1998 -2005 RHNA.
Policy 2.2 Ensure residential sites have appropriate public services, facilities,
circulation, and other needed infrastructure to support development.
Policy 2.3 Investigate rezoning or redesignation of commercial lots that are no
longer economically viable uses to appropriate residential uses.
Policy 2.4 Promote and encourage mixed -use residential and commercial uses
where appropriate as a means to facilitate development.
3. Housing Assistance and Special Needs
Moorpark is home to a number of groups with special housing needs, including seniors,
large families, farm workers, disabled persons, and single parent families, among others.
These groups may face greater difficulty in finding decent and affordable housing due to
special circumstances. Special circumstances may be related to one's income, family
characteristics, disability, or health issues.
GOAL 3: Expand and protect housing opportunities for lower income
households and special needs groups.
Policy 3.1 Use public financial resources, to the extent feasible, to support the
provision and production of housing for lower- income households and
persons and families with special needs.
Policy 3.2 Provide rental assistance to address existing housing problems and
provide homeownership assistance to expand housing opportunities.
Policy 3.3 Support the conservation of mobile home parks, historic neighborhoods,
publicly- subsidized housing, and other sources of affordable housing.
Policy 3.4 Require, in aggregate, 10% of new units to be affordable to lower- income
households. Establish priority for usage of in -lieu fee as follows: 1"priority
— production of affordable housing; 2nd — subsidy of affordable housing;
(� 3°' — housing rehabilitation; and 4 priority — housing assistance.
City of Moorpark 5 -7 Housing Element
HOUSENG PLAN
4. Removal of Government Constraints
Market factors and government regulations can significantly impact the production and
affordability of housing. Although market conditions are often beyond the direct
influence of any jurisdiction, efforts can be directed at ensuring the reasonableness of
land use controls, development standards, permit - processing, fees and exactions, and
governmental requirements to encourage housing production.
GOAL 4: Where appropriate, mitigate unnecessary governmental constraints
to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing.
Policy 4.1 Periodically review City regulations, ordinances, fees /exactions to ensure
they do not unduly constrain the production, maintenance, and
improvement of housing.
Policy 4.2 Offer regulatory incentives and concessions for affordable housing, such
as relief from development standards, density bonuses, or fee waivers
where deemed to be appropriate.
Policy 4.3 Provide for streamlined, timely, and coordinated processing of residential
projects to minimize holding costs and encourage housing production.
Policy 4.4 Support infill development at suitable locations and provide, where
appropriate, incentives to facilitate their development.
5. Fair and Equal Housing Opportunity
Ensuring fair and equal housing opportunity is an important goal. Whether through
mediating disputes, investigating bona fide complaints of discrimination, or through the
provision of education services, the provision of fair housing services is an important tool
to ensure fair and equal access to housing. The following policies are designed to
continue implementation of applicable fair housing laws.
GOAL 5: Ensure fair and equal housing opportunity for all persons regardless
of race, religion, sex, marital status, family type, ancestry, national
origin, color or other protected status.
Policy 5.1 Provide fair housing services to residents and assure that residents are
aware of their rights and responsibilities with respect to fair housing.
Policy 5.2 Discourage discrimination in either the sale or rental of housing on the
basis of state or federal protected classes.
Policy 5.3 Implement appropriate action items identified in the Ventura County
Analysis of Impediments to ensure fair and equal access to housing.
City of Moorpark 5 -8 Housing Element
r^
HOUSERG PLAN
C. Housing Programs
The goals and policies contained in the Housing Element address Moorpark's housing
needs and are implemented through housing programs offered by the City's Community
Development Department and Redevelopment Agency. In drafting these programs, the
Government Code requires the housing element to address five major areas:
Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
Assisting in the Provision /Development of Housing
➢ Providing Adequate Sites to Achieve Diversity
➢ Removing Governmental Constraints
➢ Promoting Equal Housing Opportunity
This section describes the programs that Moorpark will implement to address housing
needs within the community. Chart 5 -2 provides a summary of each program, five -year
objective, the funding sources, and the agency responsible to implement the program.
Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
1. Housing Rehabilitation
The Housing Rehabilitation Program provides
!`^ rehabilitation loans to low- income owner households.
Loans up to $20,000 are provided for owner -
occupied housing and $6,500 for mobilehome units.
Very low- income households pay no interest and
repayment of the loan is due at the time of sale for
single - family units versus 10 years for mobilehomes.
For low- income households, they pay only a 3%
annual interest rate amortized over 10 years for
single family units and 7 years for mobile homes.
Mobilehomes can receive a 50% increase if they
received a waiver in rent increase (Program 10a).
2. Code Enforcement
The City maintains two full -time code enforcement
officers to ensure compliance with building and
property maintenance codes. The Code Enforcement
Division receives approximately 90 citizen complaints
per month. The Code Enforcement Division plays a
key role in improving Moorpark neighborhoods. The
Division handles a variety of issues ranging from
property maintenance (e.g. illegally park vehicles,
overgrown vegetation) to housing conditions. For
housing code violations, the property owners are
referred to the City's housing program staff.
Five Year Objective:
Provide loans for a maximum
of 50 single - family units and
25 mobile home units.
Five -Year Objective:
Continue code enforcement
activities.
City of Moorpark 5 -9 Housing Element
f
f
Adequate Residential Sites
3. Program to Rezone Sites
Vacant and underutilized commercially -zoned sites
offer opportunity to accommodate residential
development and the RHNA. In the past several
years, developers have initiated the conversion of
commercial sites for residential use. The City's
rezoning has resulted in the Archstone project and
the Pacific Communities project noted in Chapter 4.
Other projects are under consideration. Taken
together, nearly 60% of the City's RHNA has been
addressed through conversion of commercial sites.
Given the rate of transition of commercial sites.
adequate sites will be available to facilitate and
encourage housing Production that is commensurate
with the City's 1998 -2005 RHNA. Housing
affordability of the units to be built will be governed
by the development agreement and inclusionary
requirements. However, if adequate sites do not
become available by ending 2002. the City shall take
proactive steps to rezone land and /or increase the
density of existing sites to address the shortfall.
4. Downtown Specific Program
The Downtown Specific Plan, which was adopted in
1998, is designed to encourage a pedestrian -
oriented mix of businesses, offices, and residential
uses in the Downtown area. The Downtown Specific
Plan area is characterized by smaller lots,
underutilized lots, older single - family homes, and a
historic district. Because the majority of lots are
irregularly shaped, the Zoning Code restricts density
for lots of 7,000 square feet to 7 units per acre.
According to the Specific Plan. the Downtown offers
significant 0000rtunities for Public or private
involvement in facilitating mixed use, infill, and
affordable housing. The Zoning Code offers
incentives to facilitate the Downtown Specific Plan. If
parcels are combined or merged, the maximum
density can be increased to 14 units /acre. However.
given the rapid pace of development in the City,
there is a need for a more formal inventory of
suitable sites for ootential residential development.
City of Moorpark
5 -10
Five -Year Objective:
Monitor compliance with the
RHNA. and if a shortfall
appears evident by end of
2002. (1) upzone selected
sites and/or (2) rezone
commercial land for residential
use. The amount of land and
the density thereof will be
determined based on the
shortfall evident end of 2002
Five -Year Objective:
Further the Downtown
Specific Plan purposes by
conducting a formal land
inventory by end of 2002.
Housing Element
(r--.
r
5. Farm Worker Housing
Though most agricultural areas are located outside
Moorpark, some farmworkers live in the community.
Year -round farm labor is typically housed in existing
housing, government- assisted units, and mobile
homes. Farm labor housing is permitted in five zone
districts. Examples include the Villa Campesina
development, a sweat - equity project constructed for
farmworkers and low income households in 1990.
The City will continue to assist in the development of
housing to address the needs of local farmworkers.
6. Land Use Element/Zoning
The Moorpark Land Use Element and Zoning Code
provide for various residential uses, ranging from a
density of 1/4 to 1 du/acre in rural and agricultural
areas, and from to 2 du /acre in medium density
areas, to 15 du/acre in medium -high density areas.
The Zoning Code also permits housing densities
above those specified in the underlying zone with the
use of the density bonus provisions. In addition,
Specific Plans are also used to provide flexibility from
residential development standards. These sites, in
conjunction with the appropriate affordability tool
(e.g., inclusionary or density bonus program) provide
the means to facilitate and encourage a range in
types and prices of housing to address the RHNA.
7. Second Units
A secondary unit is a separate dwelling unit that
Provides complete, independent living facilities for
one or more persons. Second units are currently
students, and seniors.
City of Moorpark
5 -11
HOUSING PLAN
Five -Year Objective:
Continue to make provision
for availability of farm worker
housing in the community.
Five -Year Objective:
Provide appropriate land use
designations and sites to
facilitate the achievement of
the City's 1998 -2005 RHNA as
follows:
269 very low income units.
155 low income units.
383 moderate income units.
and
448 upper income units.
Five -Year Objective:
The City will continue to
permit second units in all
residential zones pursuant to
an administrative permit. The
City anticipates that 12
second units will be built
during the planning period.
Housing Element
r,
r^
Housing Assistance and Special Needs
8. Section 8 Rental Assistance
The Section 8 program provides rent subsidies to
very low income households who spends more than
50 percent of their income on rent. Prospective
renters secure housing from HUD - registered
apartments that accept the certificates. HUD pays to
the landlords the difference between what the tenant
can afford to pay and the payment standard. Under
the Section 8 voucher program, a family can choose
more costly housing, if they pay the rent difference.
The Ventura County Housing Authority administers
the Section 8 program on behalf of the City.
9. Homeownership Programs
The City of Moorpark utilizes a combination of City -
sponsored home - ownership programs coupled with
various other programs offered by other
governmental agencies to expand opportunities.
a. Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
The City participates in the federal Mortgage Credit
Certificate Program operated by Ventura County.
The MCC program allows qualified first -time
homebuyers to take an annual credit against their
federal income taxes of up to 20% of the annual
interest paid on the applicant's mortgage. The tax
credit allowance allow homebuyers more income
available to qualify for a mortgage loan and make
monthly payments. Therefore, the MCC Program is
a way to further leverage homeownership assistance.
b. Fresh Rate Program.
Moorpark participates in the Ventura Cities Mortgage
Finance Authority ( VCMFA) Fresh Rate Program.
The VCMFA provides a 4 percent down payment and
closing cost assistance. The program is financed by
the VCMFA and is limited to Moorpark residents with
incomes up to 120 percent of the County or State
median income, whichever is greater. This program
assists Moorpark in providing sufficient housing
opportunities for its moderate - income residents.
HOUSING PLAN
Five -Year Objective:
Continue to participate in
the Section 8 program,
advertise program
availability, and encourage
rental property owners to
register their units with the
Housing Authority.
Five Year Objective:
Continue participation and
advertise program
availability.
Five Year Objective:
Continue participation and
advertise program
availability.
City of Moorpark 5 -12 Housing Element
HOUSING PLAN
10. Preservation Programs
a. Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization
The Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization Program Five Year Objective:
limits rent increases for mobilehome spaces to one
adjustment per year based on changes in the level of Continue Mobilehome Park
inflation. The City will also use funds to extend the Rent Stabilization Program
life of its Hardship Waiver Program for lower income and extend life of Hardship
residents at mobilehome parks. The Hardship Waiver Waiver Program.
exempts lower income households from any annual
rent increase on a mobilehome space if that increase
results in an economic hardship for that household.
b. Preservation of Units
Moorpark is also home to various projects which
have federal, state, and /or local controls on
affordability levels. One rental complex with 74 Five Year Objective:
assisted units is funded through mortgage revenue
bonds that are not set to expire until in 2029. Continue to monitor the
Although these projects will not expire over the 2000- status of the assisted units
2010 monitoring period, the City will continue to in affordable projects.
monitor the status of this project. Another
mobilehome park also affordability controls pursuant
to the conditions of the authorizing bond measure.
As project expiration comes due, the City will work
with the owners to consider options to preserve the
units before the affordability controls expire.
C. Mobilehome Replacement
The City has two mobile home parks that provide for Five Year Objective:
affordable housing. One park. Moorpark Mobilehome
Park, has a total of 28 units priced at rents affordable Provide for the reolacement
to lower income households. In recent years, the of units and relocation of
Park has experienced significant disinvestment, tenants as required by law.
building and safety code
_been issued for building,
levied at the time of resale in May 2000.
City of Moorpark 5 -13 Housing Element
f
l
11. inclusionary Program
Through the use of development agreements, the
City's inclusionary policies require that 10% of all
units in each development project and 15% of all
units in development projects within the
redevelopment area must be affordable to low and
very low income households. In appropriate
situations, developers unable to provide units are
assessed in -lieu fees based upon the estimated cost
of providing affordable units. This occurs most often
with single - family developments in the hillsides.
$4 to $5 million in in -lieu fees that may be generated
over the planning period. Priority will be given to
oroiects that address any shortfall in the RHNA.
Particularly for very low- income households.
12. Zoning Code Revision
The City currently provides for its special needs
populations by allowing the siting of housing for farm
worker housing, senior housings, and the disabled
population in appropriate residentially -zoned areas.
However, emergency shelters and transitional
housing are currently not permitted in any zones.
Recent amendments to state housing law require
that adequate sites must be made available to allow
for emergency shelters and transitional housing. To
HOUSING PLAN
Five Year Objective:
Adopt fee expenditure
priorities as follows: 1"
priority — affordable housing
production, 2"d— subsidy of
affordable housing, Yd —
housing rehabilitation, and
40 — housing assistance.
Adopt expenditure priorities
by end of 2002.
Five -Year Objective:
Review and
revise Zoning
Code to allow the siting of
emergency
shelters and
transitional
housing
pursuant to
an approved
conditional use permit by
end of 2002.
City of Moorpark 5 -14 Housing Element
r^
l�
1^
Removal of Government Constraints
13. Land Assemblage /Disposition /Acquisition
The City and its Redevelopment Agency will continue
to encourage the provision of quality, affordable
housing through use of land write- downs, direct
financial assistance, and /or regulatory incentives.
The City will use Redevelopment Set - Aside, Housing
Trust funds, County CDBG, and other funds to assist
in acquiring and assembling property and writing
down land costs for the development of new housing.
Currently, the City is acquiring various pieces of
property in downtown Moorpark for redevelopment
purposes and affordable housing opportunities.
14. Regulatory and Financial Assistance
Regulatory assistance can be used to assist in the
development of projects that address local housing
needs. In the past housing element cvcle, the Citv
income residents. The City will continue to provide
regulatory and assistance for the development of
affordable projects that address identified housing
needs, such as special needs groups and the RHNA.
15. Assistance to CHDOs
The City will continue to work with local Community
Housing Development Organizations to provide
affordable housing to meet the needs lower income
households. In the past, the City assisted the Villa
Campesina project, a 62 -unit single - family sweat
equity development for farmworkers and other lower
income households, by reducing development fees.
Recently, the City provided bond - financing for the
Mountain View project, another Cabrillo Economic
Development Corporation project, which will provide
15 single - family homes for lower income families and
an additional 44 units for moderate - income families.
City of Moorpark
5 -15
HOUSING PLAN
Five -Year Objective:
Assist in the purchase and
assembly of land for
housing.
Five -Year Objective:
Continue to provide
regulatory assistance for
projects that address local
housing needs.
Five Year Objective:
Continue to work with local
CHDOs by providing
assistance for the
development of affordable
housing in Moorpark.
Housing Element
16. Density Bonus Program
The City provides density bonuses for developments
addressing housing needs within the community. The
General Plan allows a density bonus from 15 units to
20 units per acre for senior citizen and /or
developments with 20% of the units affordable to
lower income households._ Three tiers of density
bonuses are designed to address site specific
constraints. For instance. the City provides lot
consolidation incentives in the Downtown Specific
Plan area, density transfer provisions for
development in the hillsides and standard densitv
bonus provisions for elsewhere in Moorpark
Additional incentives, approved by City Council may
increase density up to 30 units per acre.
17. R -P -D Zone Designation
The R -P -D Zone designation provides flexibility in the
development process to meet specific housing
needs. The R -P -D Zone designation offers various
densities that can be tailored to the lot, nature of the
development, and local housing needs. The R -P -D
Zone provides a mechanism for the development of
higher density housing (up to 15 du/ac) and can be
coupled with a density bonus, financial and
regulatory incentives to provide affordable housing.
Recently, the Archstone project used the RPD
designation to secure modified development
standards and increased density, along with its
inclusionary requirements, to facilitate the set aside
of 20% of the units for lower- income households
Fair Housing Services
18. Fair Housing Services
Moorpark, in conjunction with Ventura County, will
continue to ensure the provision of fair housing
services for its residents. These services will include
counseling and information on housing
discrimination, landlord- tenant dispute resolution,
bilingual housing literature, and testing for housing
discrimination. In addition, the City adopted the
Ventura County Analysis of Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice (AI) in July 2000. The City will work
with local fair housing agencies and the County to
implement recommendations in the Al.
HOUSING PLAN
Five -Year Objective:
Encourage housing
development through State
density bonus law and
incentives.
Five -Year Objective:
Continue to use the R -P -D
Zone designation to
address local housing
needs.
Five -Year Objective:
Continue to support
provision of fair housing
services.
City of Moorpark 5 -16 Housing Element
r�
t�
HOUSING PLAN
Chart 5-2: Housing Program Implementation Summary
Housing
Program Action
Funding
Responsible
Time -
Program ,
Objective
Source
Agency
Frame
Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
1. Housing
Provide loans for 50
RDA Set -
Rehabilitation
single - family and 25
Aside and
RDA
2000 -
Program
Preserve and
mobile home owners
Housing
2005
improve
neighborhoods
Trust Fund
Continue code
Community
2. Code
and housing
enforcement
Department
Development
2000 -
Enforcement
activities
Budget
Department
2005
(CDD)
Residential Sites
If a shortfall appears
by ending 2002,(1)
3. Rezone
upzone selected
Department
CDD
End of
Sites
sites and /or (2)
Budget
2002
rezone commercial
Provide
land for the RHNA
4. Downtown
Further the
Specific
sufficient sites
Downtown Specific
Department
RDA & CDD
End of
Program
to address the
Plan by conducting a
Budget
2002
full range of
housing needs
land inventory.
5. Farmworker
Continue to make
Department
2000 -
Housing
identified in the
provision for
Budget
RDA 8 CDD
2005
RHNA.
famnvorker housing
6. Land Use
Provide appropriate
Element
land use desig-
Department
COD
2000 -
/Zoning
nations and sites to
Budget
2005
facilitate the RHNA
7. Second
Continue to permit
I
Department
CDD
2000 -
Units
second units
I Budget
1
2005
Provision of Housing and Housing Assistance
8. Section 8
Facilitate rental
Continue subsidy
Section 8
Ventura
County
2000 -
Rental
opportunities
and advertise
Vouchers
Housing
2005
Assistance
program
/Certificates
Authority
9a. Mortgage
Continue to
Credit
participate in
Ventura
RDA
2000 -
Certificate
Facilitate
program and
County
2005
home-
ownership
advertise
Continue to
9b. Fresh Rate
opportunities
participate in
VCMFA
VCFMA
2000 -
Program
program and
Bond funds
2005
advertise
Mobile-
10a. Mobile
Continue program,
home Rent
Preserve
extend Hardship Fee
Department
RDA
2000 -
Stabilization
Program
affordability of
publicly-
Waiver Program
Budget
2005
1 0b.
assisted
Work with property
RDA Set -
Preservation of
housing
owners to preserve
Housing
RDA
2W5
At -Risk Units
units
Trust Funds
City of Moorpark 5 -17 Housing Element
f
(
r1
HOUSING PLAN
Housing
, Program .
Program Action
Funding
Responsible
Time.
Program
Objective
Source
Agency
Frame
10c.
Replace mobile
RA
Mobilehome
home tenants or
Housina
RDA
2000 -
Replacement
relocate as reeuir ed
Trust Funds
2005
—
by law
11
Subsidizes the
Continue program
Department
Inclusionary
Provision of
and establish
Budget,
RDA & CDD
End of
Program
affordable
priorities for fund
Housing
2002
housing
expenditures.
Trust Funds
Permits
Review and revise
Zoning Code to
12. Zoning
emergency
shelters and
permit emergency
Department
COD
End of
Code Revision
transitional
shelters & transi-
Budget
2002
housing
ti housing
pursuant to CUP.
Removal of Government Constraints
13. Land
Assembles
Assist in the
RDA Set -
Assembla a
Assemblage
Property to
Purchase and
Aside,
2000 -
/Disposition
encourage
affordable
assembly of land
Housing
Trust Funds
RDA
2005
/Acquisition
housing
for housing
and CDBG
Provides
Department
14. Regulatory
regulatory
Continue to provide
Budget,
and Financial
assistance for
regulatory
RDA Set-
CDD
2000 -
Assistance
projects that
assistance
Aside or
2005
address local
Housing
housing needs
Trust Funds
Addresses local
Work with CHDOs
RDA Set -
15. Assistance
housing needs
to provide
Aside
RDA & CDD
2000 -
to CHDOs
by working with
affordable housing
Housing
2005
CHDOs
Trust Funds
Encourages
Provide density
16. Density
development of
Department
2000 -
Bonus
affordable
incentives for
Budget
CDD
2005
housing
seniorPow income
housing
17. R -P -D
Provide
Continue to use
Zone
flexibility in
designation to meet
Department
CDD
2000 -
Designation
meeting local
local housing
Budget
2005
housing needs
needs.
Fair and Equal Housing Opportunity
Fair
Provides fair
Continue to provide
Department
Ho
Housing
housing service
and implements
fair housing
Budget,
CDBG
CDD
2000 -2005
Services
the City's Al.
services
funds
Summary of Goals
Construction
Rehabilitation
Preservation
Very Low Income
269
5
104
Low Income
155
70
0
Moderate Income
383
0
0
Upper Income
448
0
0
City of Moorpark 5 -18 Housing Element
Appendix
Housing Element Glossary
,,-
ra
0
HOUSING ELzMFNT
APPENDIX A. - HOUSING ELEMENT GLOSSARY
Acre: a unit of land measure equal to 43,560 square feet.
Acreage, Net: The portion of a site exclusive of existing or planned public or private
road rights -of -way.
Affordability Covenant: A property title agreement which places resale or rental
restrictions on a housing unit.
Affordable Housing: Under State and federal statutes, housing which costs no more
than 30 percent of gross household income. Housing costs include rent or mortgage
payments, utilities, taxes, insurance, homeowner association fees, and other costs.
Annexation: The incorporation of land area into the jurisdiction of an existing city with a
resulting change in the boundaries of that city.
Assisted Housing: Housing that has been subsidized by federal, state, or local housing
programs.
At -Risk Housing: Multi- family rental housing that is at risk of losing its status as housing
affordable for low and moderate income tenants due to the expiration of federal, state or
local agreements.
California Department of Housing and Community Development - HCD: The State
Department responsible for administering State - sponsored housing programs and for
reviewing housing elements to determine compliance with State housing law.
Census : The official United States decennial enumeration of the population conducted
by the federal government.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): A grant program administered by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This grant allots money to
cities and counties for housing rehabilitation and community development activities,
including public facilities and economic development.
Condominium: A building or group of buildings in which units are owned individually,
but the structure, common areas and facilities are owned by all owners on a
proportional, undivided basis.
Density: The number of dwelling units per unit of land. Density usually is expressed
"per acre," e.g., a development with 100 units located on 20 acres has density of 5.0
units per acre.
Density Bonus: The allowance of additional residential units beyond the maximum for
which the parcel is otherwise permitted usually in exchange for the provision or
F- preservation of affordable housing units at the same site or at another location.
City of Moorpark General Plan A -1
t�
f
HousiNG ELEMENT
Development Impact Fees: A fee or charge imposed on developers to pay for a
jurisdiction's costs of providing services to new development.
Development Right: The right granted to a land owner or other authorized party to
improve a property. Such right is usually expressed in terms of a use and intensity
allowed under existing zoning regulation. For example, a development right may specify
the maximum number of residential dwelling units permitted per acre of land.
Dwelling, Multi- family: A building containing two or more dwelling units for the use of
individual households; an apartment or condominium building is an example of this
dwelling unit type.
Dwelling, Single - family Attached: A one - family dwelling attached to one or more other
one - family dwellings by a common vertical wall. Row houses and town homes are
examples of this dwelling unit type.
Dwelling, Single - family Detached: A dwelling, not attached to any other dwelling,
which is designed for and occupied by not more than one family and surrounded by
open space or yards.
Dwelling Unit: One or more rooms, designed, occupied or intended for occupancy as
separate living quarters, with cooking, sleeping and sanitary facilities provided within the
unit for the exclusive use of a household.
Elderly Household: As defined by HUD, elderly households are one- or two- member
(family or non - family) households in which the head or spouse is age 62 or older.
Element: A division or chapter of the General Plan.
Emergency Shelter: An emergency shelter is a facility that provides shelter to homeless
families and /or homeless individuals on a limited short-term basis.
Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG): A grant program administered by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provided on a formula basis to
large entitlement jurisdictions.
Entitlement City: A city, which based on its population, is entitled to receive funding
directly from HUD. Examples of entitlement programs include CDBG, HOME and ESG.
Fair Market Rent (FMR): Fair Market Rents (FMRs) are freely set rental rates defined
by HUD as the median gross rents charged for available standard units in a county or
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). Fair Market Rents are used for the
Section 8 Rental Program and many other HUD programs and are published annually by
HUD.
First -Time Home Buyer: Defined by HUD as an individual or family who has not owned
a home during the three -year period preceding the HUD - assisted purchase of a home.
City of Moorpark General Plan A -2
HOUSING ELEMENT
Jurisdictions may adopt local definitions for first -time homebuyer programs which differ
from non - federally funded programs.
Floor Area Ratio (FAR): The gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the lot
area; usually expressed as a numerical value (e.g., a building having 10,000 square feet
of gross floor area located on a lot of 5,000 square feet in area has a FAR of 2:1).
General Plan: The General Plan is a legal document, adopted by the legislative body of
a City or County, setting forth policies regarding long -term development. California law
requires the preparation of seven elements or chapters in the General Plan: Land Use,
Housing, Circulation, Conservation, Open Space, Noise, and Safety. Additional
elements are permitted, such as Economic Development, Urban Design and similar local
concerns.
Group Quarters: A facility which houses unrelated persons not living in households
(U.S. Census definition). Examples of group quarters include institutions, dormitories,
shelters, military quarters, assisted living facilities and other quarters, including single -
room occupancy housing, where 10 or more unrelated individuals are housed.
Growth Management: Techniques used by a government to regulate the rate, amount,
location and type of development.
r� HCD: The State Department of Housing and Community Development.
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA): The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act requires
larger lending institutions making home mortgage loans to publicly disclose the location
and disposition of home purchase, refinance and improvement loans. Institutions
subject to HMDA must also disclose the gender, race, and income of loan applicants.
HOME Program: The HOME Investment Partnership Act, Title II of the National
Affordable Housing Act of 1990. HOME is a Federal program administered by HUD
which provides formula grants to States and localities to fund activities that build, buy,
and /or rehabilitate affordable housing for rent or home ownership or provide direct rental
assistance to low- income people.
Homeless: Families and individuals whose primary nighttime residence is a public or
private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation
(e.g., the street, sidewalks, cars, vacant and abandoned buildings). Sheltered homeless
are families and persons whose primary nighttime residence is a supervised publicly or
privately operated shelter (e.g., emergency, transitional, battered women, and homeless
youth shelters; and commercial hotels or motels used to house the homeless).
Household: The Census Bureau defines a household as all persons living in a housing
unit whether or not they are related. A single person living in an apartment as well as a
family living in a house is considered a household. Household does not include
individuals living in dormitories, prisons, convalescent homes, or other group quarters.
Pursuant to HUD, households are defined as follows: small — two to four non - elderly
persons; large- with 5 or more members; or senior — over age 62.
City of Moorpark General Plan A-3
HOUSING ELEMENT
Household Income: The total income of all the persons living in a household. A
household income is often described as very low, low, moderate, and upper incomes
based upon household size and income, relative to the regional median income.
Housing Problems: Defined by HUD as a household which: (1) occupies a unit with
physical defects (lacks complete kitchen or bathroom); (2) meets the definition of
overcrowded; or (3) spends more than 30% of income on housing cost.
Housing Subsidy: Housing subsidies refer to government assistance aimed at reducing
housing sales or rent prices to more affordable levels. Two general types of housing
subsidy exist. Where a housing subsidy is linked to a particular house or apartment,
housing subsidy is "project" or "unit" based. In Section 8 rental assistance programs the
subsidy is linked to the family and assistance provided to any number of families
accepted by willing private landlords. This type of subsidy is said to be "tenant based."
Housing Unit: A room or group of rooms used by one or more individuals living
separately from others in the structure, with direct access to the outside or to a public
hall and containing separate toilet and kitchen facilities.
Income Category: Four categories are used to classify a household according to
income based on the median income for the county. Under state housing statutes, these
categories are defined as follows: Very Low (0 -50% of County median); Low (50 -80% of
County median); Moderate (80 -120% of County median); and Upper (over 120 %).
Manufactured Housing: Housing constructed of manufactured components, assembled
partly at the site rather than totally at the site. Also referred to as modular housing.
Market Rate Housing: Housing available on the open market without any subsidy of
which the price is determined by the market forces of supply and demand.
Median Income: The annual income for each household size within a region which is
defined annually by HUD. Half of the households in the region have incomes above the
median and half have incomes below the median.
Mobile Home: A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is at least 8
feet in width and 32 feet in length, is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be
used as a dwelling unit when connected to the required utilities, either with or without a
permanent foundation.
Overcrowding: As defined by the U.S. Census, a household with greater than 1.01
persons per room, excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, and porches. Severe
overcrowding is defined as households with greater than 1.51 persons per room.
Overpayment: The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed
30 percent of gross household income, based on data published by the Census Bureau.
Severe overpayment exists if gross housing costs exceed 50 percent of gross income.
City of Moorpark General Plan A-4
t�
HOUSING ELEMENT
Parcel: The basic unit of land entitlement. A designated area of land established by
plat, subdivision, or otherwise legally defined and permitted to be used, or built upon.
Physical Defects: A housing unit lacking complete kitchen or bathroom facilities.
Jurisdictions may expand the Census definition in defining units with physical defects.
Project -Based Rental Assistance: Rental assistance provided for a project, not for a
specific tenant. A tenant receiving project -based rental assistance gives up the right to
that assistance upon moving from the project.
Public Housing: A project -based low -rent housing program operated by independent
local public housing authorities. A low- income family applies to the local public housing
authority in the area in which they want to live.
Redevelopment Agency: California Law provides authority to establish a
Redevelopment Agency with the scope and financing mechanisms necessary to remedy
blight and provide stimulus to eliminate deteriorated conditions. The law provides for
the planning, development, redesign, clearance, reconstruction, or rehabilitation, or any
combination of these, and the provision of public and private improvements as may be
appropriate or necessary in the interest of the general welfare by the Agency.
Redevelopment law requires an Agency to set aside 20% of all tax increment dollars
generated from each redevelopment project area for the purpose of increasing and
�,- improving the community's supply of housing for low and moderate income households.
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA): The Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) is based on projections of population growth and housing unit
demand and assigns a share of the region's future housing need to each jurisdiction
within the SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) region. These
housing need numbers serve as the basis for the update of the Housing Element.
Rehabilitation: The upgrading of a building previously in a dilapidated or substandard
condition for human habitation or use.
Section 8 Rental Voucher /Certificate Program: A tenant -based rental assistance
program that subsidizes a family's rent in a privately owned house or apartment. The
program is administered by local public housing authorities. Assistance payments are
based on 30 percent of household annual income. Households with incomes of 50
percent or below the area median income are eligible to participate in the program.
Service Needs: The particular services required by special populations, typically
including needs such as transportation, personal care, housekeeping, counseling,
meals, case management, personal emergency response, and other services preventing
premature institutionalization and assisting individuals to continue living independently.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG): The Southern California
Association of Governments is a regional planning agency which encompasses six
to-,, counties: Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura.
SCAG is responsible for preparing the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
City of Moorpark General Plan A -5
HOUSING ELEMENT
Special Needs Groups: Segments of the population which have a more difficult time
finding decent affordable housing due to special circumstances. Under California
Housing Element statutes, special needs groups consist of the elderly, disabled, large
families, female- headed households, farm workers, and the homeless. A jurisdiction
may also consider additional special needs, such as students, military households, etc.
Subdivision: The division of a lot, tract or parcel of land in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.).
Substandard Housing: Housing which does not meet the minimum standards
contained in the State Housing Code (i.e. does not provide shelter, endangers the
health, safety or well -being of occupants). Jurisdictions may adopt more stringent local
definitions of substandard housing.
Supportive Housing: Housing with a supporting environment, such as group homes or
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing and other housing that includes a supportive
service component such as those defined below.
Supportive Services: Services provided to residents of supportive housing for the
purpose of facilitating the independence of residents. Some examples are case
management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, child care,
transportation, and job training.
f'1
Tenant -Based Rental Assistance: A form of rental assistance in which the assisted
tenant may move from a dwelling unit with a right to continued assistance. The
assistance is provided for the tenant, not for the project.
Transitional Housing: Transitional housing is temporary (often six months to two years)
housing for a homeless individual or family who is transitioning to permanent housing.
Transitional housing often includes a supportive services component (e.g. job skills
training, rehabilitation counseling, etc.) to allow individuals to gain necessary life skills in
support of independent living.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): The cabinet level
department of the federal government responsible for housing, housing assistance, and
urban development at the national level. Housing programs administered through HUD
include Community Development Block Grant, HOME and Section 8, among others.
Zoning: A land use regulatory measure enacted by local government. Zoning district
regulations governing lot size, building bulk, placement, and other development
standards vary from district to district, but must be uniform within the same district. Each
city and county adopts a zoning ordinance specifying these regulations.
City of Moorpark General Plan A -6