Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES PC 2004 0456 0406RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2004 -456 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001 -05, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2001 -02, FOR THE NORTH PARK VILLAGE AND NATURE PRESERVE SPECIFIC PLAN, CONSISTING OF 1,650 HOUSING UNITS ON 3,586.3 ACRES, LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF MOORPARK COLLEGE AND STATE ROUTE 118 ON LAND IMMEDIATELY OUTSIDE CITY OF MOORPARK MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES, ON THE APPLICATION OF NORTH PARK VILLAGE, LP (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 500 -0 -120 -065; 500 -0 -170 -135; 500 -0- 180 -125, - 135, -145, -155, -165, -175, -185, -195, -205, - 215, -225, -235, -245, -255; 500 -0- 281 -165, -175; 500 -0- 292 -135, -145, -195, -215, -225; 615- 0 -110- 205, -215; AND 615 -0 -150 -185) WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on October 7, 2003, October 21, 2003, November 4, 2003, November 18, 2003, December 2, 2003, December 16, 2003, January 6, 2004, January 20, 2004, February 3, 2004, February 17, 2004, March 2, 2004, and March 16, 2004, and April 6, 2004, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, and Zone Change No. 2001 -02 on the application of North Park Village, LP for the North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan, consisting of 1,650 housing units and related and supporting uses on 3,586.3 acres, located generally north of Moorpark College and State Route 118 on land immediately outside City of Moorpark Municipal Boundaries; and WHEREAS, at its meetings of October 7, 2003, October 21, 2003, November 4, 2003, November 18, 2003, December 2, 2003, December 16, 2003, January 6, 2004, January 20, 2004, February 3, 2004, February 17, 2004, March 2, 2004, and March 16, 2004, and April 6, 2004, the Planning Commission considered the agenda reports and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; continued the open public hearing at each meeting through April 6, 2004, closed the public hearing on April 6, 2004 and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the proposed North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan, comments received on the Draft EIR and Chapter Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 2 of 30 3.3(b) of the Revised Draft EIR, draft responses to comments received on the Draft EIR and Chapter 3.3(B) of the Revised Draft EIR, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTION: Based upon its review and consideration of the Revised Draft EIR, all appendices, all comments received, and all draft responses to comments, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council, upon review and consideration of the information contained in the Final EIR, certify that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City environmental review procedures and that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Moorpark, SECTION 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information set forth in the draft North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan, the Environmental Impact Report, agenda reports, accompanying studies, and public testimony, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05 as included in Exhibit A, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01, as included in Exhibit B with revisions as included in Exhibit C, and Zone Change No. 2001 -02 to prezone the entire property contained within the North Park Specific Plan boundaries as "Specific Plan (SP) ", and to add Chapter 17.70 to the Moorpark Municipal Code as included in Chapter 5 of Exhibit B. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 3 of 30 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners DiCecco, Landis and Peskay, Vice Chair Lauletta and Chair Pozza NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2004. G� Scott Pozza, Chair j hry Hog y De e pmen t Director Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05 Exhibit B: Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 Exhibit C: Recommended Revisions to Specific Plan No. 2001- 01 Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 4 of 30 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001 -05 LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENTS: The Land Use Element of the City of Moorpark General Plan is amended to read as follows: SECTION 4.0 LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES: Page 11 of the General Plan, under the heading Growth and Population, Policy 2.1 is amended to read as follows: Growth and Population GOAL 1: Attain a balanced city growth pattern that includes a full mix of land uses. Policy 1.1: New development and redevelopment shall be orderly with respect to location, timing and density/ intensity; consistent with the provision of local public services and facilities; and compatible with the overall suburban rural community character. Policy 1.2: Every five years the City's land use inventory shall be reviewed and, if necessary, the land use element shall be modified to ensure that general -plan policies are being adhered to and to provide an adequate up -to -date data base for continuing development considerations. Policy 1.3: New residential development shall be consistent with City- adopted growth ordinance policies. Policy 1.4: New development and redevelopment shall be coordinated so that the existing and planned capacity of public facilities and services shall not be adversely impacted. Policy 1.5: A comprehensive planning approach for undeveloped areas of the community shall be followed, to prevent disjointed, incremental expansion of development. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 5 of 30 GOAL 2: Establish a logical Sphere of Influence. Policy 2.1: The City shall strive to obtain and maintain sphere of influence boundaries consistent with the City Urban Restriction Boundary, as amended by vote of the electorate, or pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 8.4. SECTION 5.2 SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION - SP: Page 35 of the General Plan under the subtitle "Planning Area Outside City Limits" is amended to read as follows: Planning Area Outside City Limits Specific plan areas 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (proposed within the unincorporated planning area) were analyzed in conjunction with the updating of the Land Use Element but were found to be outside the sphere of influence and outside of the CURB (see, Section 8.0, et seq.) and accordingly not appropriate for urban development and were, therefore, not approved. Specific Plan 4 (Deleted) Specific Plan 5 (Deleted) Specific Plan 6 (Deleted) Specific Plan 7 (Deleted) Specific Plan 8 (Deleted) Specific Plan 11 Specific Plan 11 consists of approximately 3,544- acres, located north of State Route 118 (SR -118), northeast of downtown Moorpark and north of Moorpark College The Specific Plan area lies entirely within the City of Moorpark's area of interest. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 6 of 30 The North Park Village and Nature Preserve Specific Plan shall incorporate the following elements and policies: Required Plan Elements: ■ A 2,121 -acre Nature Preserve Urban Restriction Boundarv. ■ A 423 -acre open space system. ■ A 29 -acre community park. rotected by the Current ■ A 1.5 -acre fire station site, and 1.5 -acre fire service helispot site. ■ A 67 -acre recreation lake area (including lake surface and lake buffer). ■ An 18 -acre school site offered for dedication to the Moorpark Unified School District. ■ A minimum 500 -foot open space buffer between existing homes and new homes. ■ A maximum of 1,500 single- family detached homes and 150 affordable homes. ■ A new SR -118 interchange approximately one mile east of Collins Drive providing direct vehicular access from SR -118 to the Specific Plan area and Moorpark College. ■ A maximum of 45,000 square feet of local serving, lake oriented commercial uses. Required Plan Policies: ■ The number and density of homes or size of the Neighborhood Center permitted in the Specific Plan 11 may not be increased without approval of the Moorpark electorate. ■ The Nature Preserve and the City Urban Restriction Boundary cannot be changed without approval of the Moorpark electorate. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 7 of 30 ■ Development within the Specific Plan area shall pay the Moorpark Unified School District's school impact fees as defined by state law. ■ The size of the 500 foot open space buffer may not be changed without approval of the Moorpark electorate ■ Seventy -five percent of hillside in the Specific Plan area with slopes greater than twenty -five percent shall be preserved. ■ At least eighty percent of the existing oak trees within the planning area subject to the Moorpark Tree Protection Ordinance shall be preserved and the remaining oak trees affected by the Specific Plan shall be either relocated or replaced so that the planning area ultimately contains a net increase in oak trees. SECTION 6.0 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL Si7MWMY; Page 38, consisting of three paragraphs, is amended to read as follows: The following table (Land Use Plan - statistical summary, Table 3) summarizes the approximate acreage and the number of dwelling units resulting from each of the land use classifications designated on the Land Use Plan maps for the overall planning area (City Area - Exhibit 3, and Unincorporated Area - Exhibit 4). Dwelling unit n/c is based on an estimate of the density, which could occur for each residential land use classification based on the maximum density permitted. The actual number of dwelling units constructed and associated population amount will vary with the development conditions and constraints for each project (access, availability of services, geotechnical and natural resource constraints, etc.). In addition, a density increase above the maximum density could be approved, up to the designated density limit for each residential land use category, if public improvements, public services, and /or financial contributions are provided that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, except that the overall number of homes in SP 11 (North Park Village and Nature Preserve Plan) may not be changed without vote of the residents of the City of Moorpark. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 8 of 30 As identified on Table 3, a combined total of up to 12,5-11 14,161 dwelling units could be constructed in the overall City of Moorpark planning area, based on maximum density estimates. The resulting build -out population for the Moorpark planning area would be approximately 34,280 38,801 persons, based on the County's 2.74 population dwelling unit factor for the year 2010. Note, however, that the resulting build -out for the Moorpark planning area would be approximately (a) 43,799 47,312 persons, based on the California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit's "Ventura County Population and Housing Estimates" for Moorpark which average 3.341 persons per household for the year 1994 -1997 inclusive; or, (b) 40,:7 8 81 46,165 persons, based on the "VCOG 2020 population Per Dwelling Unit Ratio Forecast" for the City of Moorpark (3.26 persons per dwelling unit). The Table 3 build -out figures were calculated using the smaller county -wide ratios and are considered a conservative population estimate for the City. Additionally, the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this land use element and circulation element update of the Moorpark General Plan evaluates potential impacts on the service capabilities of relevant infrastructure systems (i.e., sewer, water, police, fire, etc.) associated with the land use designations proposed as a part of this update process. Environmental documents prepared for subsequent and proposed amendments to the General Plans evaluate the potential impacts of such amendments. SECTION 6.0 TABLE 3, LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY: Pages 39 -40 of the Moorpark General Plan, Table 3, are amended to add the North Park Village and Nature Preserve Plan (SP 11) to the City's Land Use Designation, Unincorporated Area and Planning Area, to read as follows: Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 9 of 30 TABLE 3 LAND USE PLAN - STATISTICAL SUMOMY LAND USE DESIGNATION CITY UNINCORPORATED TOTAL PLANNING AREA AREA AREA COMBINED RL RURAL LOW (1 du / 5 acres maximum) 1c , 668 a 334 du - - -' ---- 1,668 ac 334 du RH RURAL HIGH (1 du /acre maximum) 208 ac 208 du - - -- ---- 208 ac 208 du L LOW DENSITY (1 du / acre maximum) 168 ac 168 du - -- ---- 168 ac 168 du ML MEDIUM LOW DENSITY (2 du / acre maximum) 568 ac 1,136 du - - ------ 568 ac 1,136 du M MEDIUM DENSITY (4 du / acre maximum) 1,174 ac 4,696 du - - -- - - -- 1,174 ac 4,696 du H HIGH DENSITY (7 du /acre maximum) 343 ac 2,401 du - - -- - - -- 343 ac 2,401 du VH VERY HIGH DENSITY (15 du / acre Maximum) 161 ac 2,415 du - 161 ac 2,415 du SP SPECIFIC PLAN* SP 1 LEVY 285 ac 415 du - - -- - - -- 285 ac 415 du SP 2 JBR 445 ac 475 du - - -- - - -- 445 ac 475 du SP9 MUSD 25 ac 80 du - - -- - - -- 25 ac 80 du SP 10 SCHLEVE 71 ac 154 du - - -- - - -- 71 ac 154 du SP 11 NORTH PARK - - -- 3.544 ac 1.650 du 3,544 ac 1.650 du C -1 NEIGHBORHOOD 9 ac - - -- COMMERCIAL (.25 FAR) - - -- - - -- 9 ac C -2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL 194 ac - -- (.25 FAR) - - - - -- 194 ac I -1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 263 ac " " "" - " "" - - -- 263 (.38 FAR) ac I -2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL 285 ac - - -- - - -- 285 (.38 FAR) ac AGl AGRICULTURE 1 1 du / 10 -40 acres) 45 ac 1 du - - -- - - -- 45 ac AG2 AGRICULTURE 2 - - -- (1 du / 40 acres - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- OPEN SPACE 1 OSi 1 du / 10 -40 acres) 16 ac 1 du - - -- 16 ac OS2 OPEN SPACE 2 (1 du / 40 acres) 4;080 1,064 ac 27 du 1-080 1 ac 27 du S SCHOOL 357 ac - - -- - - -- - - -- 357 ac P PARK 197 ac - - -- - - -- - - -- 197 ac U UTILITIES 47 ac - - -- - - -- - - -- 47 ac PUB PUBLIC / INSTITUTIONAL 16 ac - - -- - - -- - - -- 16 ac FRWY FREEWAY/ W RIGHT -OF -WAY 291 ac - - -- - - -- - - -- 291 ac TOTAL DWELLING UNITS ** (At Build -out — Year 2010) 12,511 du 11 6. 50 du 12,511 du 14.161 du TOTAL POPULATION * ** At Build -out — Year 2010 34,280 4,521 34,280 38 801 TOT AL CITY AREA ACRES (Approximate) 7,916 TOTAL UNINCORPORATED AREA ACRES (Approximate) 0-ae 3,528 a TOTAL PLANNING AREA COMBINED (Approximate) _9#6 11.444 ac Acreage for open space, schools, parks, commercial, highway right -of -way and any other appropriate land uses will be determined at time of specific plan approval. ** Residential Density calculations for specific plan areas are based on the maximum density. Section 5.2 of the Land Use Element allows the City Council to approve a density exceeding the maximum density up to an identified density limit, if public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions are provided that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, except that the density of SP 11 (North Park Village and Nature Preserve Plan) may not be changed without a vote of the electorate of the City of Moorpark. * ** Based on 2.74 persons Der dwelling unit. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 10 EXHIBIT 41 PLANNING AREA LAND USE PLAN MAP: Amended to add SP 11 as depicted in Exhibit A2. SECTION 8.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF CURB, SUBSECTION A: Amended to clarify the proper exhibit order and name, as follows: A. The City of Moorpark hereby establishes and adopts a Moorpark City Urban Restriction Boundary (Moorpark CURB) line. The Moorpark CURB shall be established coterminous with and in the same location as the Sphere of Influence line established by the Local Agency Formation Commission as it exists as of January 1, 1998, or as altered or modified pursuant to the Amendment Procedures set forth below. Grail- re- -represe t en e f that line is shewn at Exhibit "A ". The Moorpark CURB line is depicted in General Plan Exhibit S. SECTION 8.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF CURB: The Moorpark CURB line is amended to include the approximately 1,423 acre planned development portion, as depicted in Exhibit B2 (reflecting the amended Planning Area Land Use Plan Map, Exhibit 4, City of Moorpark General Plan) and clarifying the proper General Plan Land Use Element exhibit order. CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS: The Circulation Element of the City of Moorpark General Plan is amended as follows: FIGURES 2, 3 and 4 City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Highway Network, Biking Element and Equestrian Trail Network, pages 19, 22 and 24 respectively are amended to delete Broadway Road and to add a new separate roadway system comprised of a new interchange at SR 118 (Moorpark College Interchange) and a Four -Lane Collector connecting SR -118 to Moorpark College and to SP 11, including Residential Collector and local streets, as depicted in Exhibit C2. The bikeway exhibit is amended to reflect the new road system without altering the bikeway circulation plan, as depicted in Exhibit C2. The equestrian exhibit is amended to reflect the road system and move the north eastern -most equestrian trail eastward as depicted in Exhibit E2. SECTION 5.0 ROADWAY CIRCULATION PLAN, CIRCULATION SYSTEM: The last paragraph of page 20 of the Circulation Element of the Moorpark General Plan is amended to delete Broadway Road and to add a new roadway system providing direct access to Moorpark College, as read as follows: Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 11 CIRCULATION SYSTEM The goals and policies included in the Circulation Element emphasize the need for a circulation system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving community values and character. The location, design and constituent modes of the circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise, community appearance, and other elements of the environment. The highway network designated in the Circulation Element is illustrated in Figure 2, and indicates all of the designated freeways, six -lane arterials, four -lane arterials and rural collectors. In addition, a selected number of designated local collectors, which carry through traffic, are indicated on the map. Any permanent closure to through traffic or relocation of the designated arterials and collectors will require a General Plan Amendment. Highway facilities are shown within the current City limits as well as for the surrounding planning area that has been defined for the General Plan Update. Existing and potential future traffic signal locations within the City limits are also indicated on the highway network map, as are existing and potential at -grade and grade separated railroad crossing locations. Traffic signal warrants are satisfied for the locations shown here based on current traffic projections. Traffic signalization may be required at minor street and driveway locations not shown on the Circulation Element highway network map. A grade separated railroad crossing is shown only for the future SR -118 bypass arterial crossing. Grade separation is not considered feasible at the four existing railroad crossings (Gabbert Road, Moorpark Avenue, Spring Road and Los Angeles Avenue). The roadway network in the Circulation Element indicates a number of improvements with regard to the existing roadway system in the Moorpark planning area. The following are the more important improvements that will need to be implemented: • Connection of the SR -118 and SR -23 freeways with new interchanges at Collins Drive and Princeton Avenue. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 12 • Provision of an east /west SR -118 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Los Angeles Avenue west of Buttercreek Road, without a connection to Walnut Canyon Road, and recognition of a potential future SR- 118 freeway extension west of the City limits. • Provision of a north /south SR -23 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Broadway Road. • Extension of Spring Road north to the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a local collector system to serve circulation needs in the northwest portion of the City. Local collectors added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Casey Road to Gabbert Road, "Cr° Street between Grimes Canyon Road and the SR -23 arterial bypass and "D" Street between Princeton Avenue and the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a roadway system to serve circulation needs in the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Moorpark Highlands) area in the southeast portion of the City. Roadways added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Science Drive from New Los Angeles Avenue to Tierra Rejada Road, and an extension of Peach Hill Road to Science Drive. • SR 118 freeway cFserye eireulatien —needs of pe}ort ia-1 g r p� r } e-nui - Z,-rres rr - -the lifft-it Provision of a separate roadway system comprised of an interchange at SR -118 (Moorpark College Interchange) and a Four -Lane Arterial with raised median connecting SR -118 to Moorpark College and to the Specific Plan 11 area, including residential collector and local streets. OPEN SPACE, CONSERVATION AND RECREATION ELEMENT AMENDMENTS: The Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element of the City of Moorpark General Plan is amended as follows: SECTION II OPEN SPACE, Subsection D: Existing Open Space Areas, Paragraph 2 Parks - Inventory of Existing and Proposed Facilities, page II -8 of the Open Space, Conservation and Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 13 Recreation Element of the Moorpark General Plan is amended to read as follows: 2. Parks - Invento of Proposed and Existing Facilities N m Arroyo Vista Type of Facility Community Park Size (in 69.0 n L i 4550 Tierra Rejada Rd. Status ril 1 Existin Buttercreek Neighborhood Park 13.0 South of L.A. Avenue Adjacent to Arroyo Simi Planned; Location Undecided Cam us Campus Canyon Park Community Center Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park 2.5 2.5 .5 L.A. Av. at Hartford 6400 Harvard Street 799 Moorpark Avenue Existin Existing j Existing County Trail Park Glenwood Glenwood Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park i 8.0 1 4.5 4.5 11701 1/2 Mountain Trail Tierra Rejada at Harvester Rd. 31800 Harvester Street Existing Pending Acceptance by Cit rte_ Existin Greenbelt Agreement Area ace Open S p p -- Within Tierra Rejada Valley Existing Griffin Park Neighborhood Park 5.0 15400 Campus Park Drive Existin Happy Camp Regional Park 3,700 North of the City Boundaries, but within Moor ark's Area of Interest proposed Miller Park Neighborhood Park 6.5 4530 Miller Parkway , Existin Monte Vista Nature Park Nature Park 5.0 Moorpark Rd. near Peach Hill Acceptance Pending Moorpark Community Center 4.5 Moorpark Ave. at Charles St. Existin Mountain Meadows #4 Community Park 69.0 South of Arroyo Simi at Liberty Bell Rd 39 Acres Currently Owned by City and Leased for Farming; 30 Acres Proposed for Dedication Jul 1986 Mountain Meadows N. Village Neighborhood Park 8.0 North of Tierra Rejada Rd. Design Approved b Ci Mountain Meadows S. Village Neighborhood Park 8.0 South of extension of Tierra Rejada Road Proposed Mountain Meadows W. Village g Neighborhood Park & Retention Basin 8.0 West end of Peach Hill Drain Design Approved by City North Park Lake Private Lake with Public Access 52.0 North of Citv boundaries but within Pr oposed Moorpark's Area f Intereg Inter North Park Nature Preserve Nature Preserve 2,121.0 North of City boundaries but within Proposed M r rk' A[2a of Interest North Park Northside Park Neiahborhood Park _ 1� N h of i boundaries within Proposed M r ark's Ara of InterCgt NQrth of Citv boundaries but within North Park Community Park Community Park 29.0 Proposed Mggrl2ark'a Area of In r Campus Park Rd. at College View Paul E. Griffin Sr. Neighborhood Park 4.0 Existing Peach Hill Neighborhood Park 10.0 Peach Hill Rd. and Christian Barrett Design Phase Poindexter Park Neighborhood Park 7.5 500 Poindexter Ave. Existin Tierra Rejada Lake Regional Recreation Area 250 -300 South of Tierra Rejada Road and West of the Moorpark Freeway. Outside of City Boundaries, but within Moor ark's Area of Interest Proposed p Tierra Rejada Park Neighborhood Park 8.0 11900 Mountain Trail St. Existing_ Tract 3963 Neighborhood Park 6.0 North of Campus Park Drive, West of Moorpark College Proposed Villa Cam esina Neighborhood Park .5 4704 Leta Yancy Road Existin Virginia Colony Park Neighborhood Park I 1.0 14507 Condor Drive Existin Total � 4;8}2 -5 41 . I "North P rk Vill P arks us is f 2 SECTION II, OPEN SPACE, Figure 3, Parks and Open Space Areas: Figure 3, as amended, as shown on Exhibit F2, to remove the developable portions of SP 11 (North Park Village and Nature Preserve Plan) from the open space classifications as shown on Figure 3. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 14 MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN EXHIBITS Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following exhibits /figures relating to the City of Moorpark General Plan: (a) Exhibit Al, (Existing Plan) Planning Area Land Use Map, General Plan City of Moorpark General Plan, Exhibit 4; (b) Exhibit A2, (Amendment) Planning Area Land Use Map, City of (h) Moorpark General Plan; Exhibit 4; (c) Exhibit B1, (Existing Plan) Moorpark City Urban Restriction Circulation Line, City of Moorpark General Plan; (d) Exhibit B2, (Amendment) Moorpark City Urban Restriction (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark, Line, City of Moorpark General Plan, Exhibit 5; (e) Exhibit Cl, (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark, General Plan Figure 4; Circulation Element, Highway Network, Figure 2; (f) Exhibit C2, (Amendment) City of Moorpark, General Plan Circulation Circulation Element, Highway Network, Figure 2 (Note: this (k) exhibit should be modified to show the Moorpark College Parks and access road designated as a 4 -lane arterial); (g) Exhibit Dl, (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark, General Plan Circulation Element, Bikeway Element, Figure 3; (h) Exhibit D2, (Amendment) City of Moorpark, General Plan Circulation Element, Bikeway Element, Figure 3; (i) Exhibit E1, (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark, General Plan Circulation Element, Equestrian Trail Network; Figure 4; (j) Exhibit E2, (Amendment) City of Moorpark, General Plan Circulation Element, Equestrian Trail Network; Figure 4; (k) Exhibit F1, (Existing Plan) Open Space, Parks and Recreation Element, Parks and Open Space Areas, City of Moorpark, and Figure 3; (1) Exhibit F2, (Amendment) Open Space, Parks and Recreation Element, Parks and Open space Areas, City of Moorpark, Figure 3. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 15 Exhibit A -1 (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark General Plan Planning Area Land Use Map Exhibit 4 Area of Interest • .�.......... i. ....... r1 w . ■ ■ ■ f ■ a � Current City Limits and Sphere of Influence City of Moorpark j (Refer to Exhibit 3 ■ for City Area Land Use Plan) ` — - ■ to / • •••.F . ■....... ■ ■..... ■ ■..� LEGEND CURRENT CITY LIMITS AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE �• i �• AREA OF INTEREST VENTURA COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE CURRENT CITY LIMITS 0 RURAL OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURE 5 ACRES MINIMUM Note: Please refer to the text of the Land Use Element for a description of the designated Spedfic Plan No. 8 area. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 16 Exhibit A -2 (Proposed Amendment) City of Moorpark General Plan Planning Area Land Use Map Exhibit 4 Area of Interest ZS 4 8 SP 1f11 2.121 Acn Nab m p,."e . i e23 ACIai d Opi14 SPace i ■� AC1aa d PaA. - 93 ACM d PWec / C&ma .,ft Service 769 AM V -ape (1,659 r*..jl - f 67 ACM L.. Ma Current City Limits and —j Sphere of Influence City of Moorpark .J ■ + -- / - . -..�' 'Ij ■ e t;ao sae ....................1 LEGEND / CURRENT CITY LIMITS AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREA OF INTEREST VENTURA COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE CURRENT CITY LIMITS RURAL O OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURE 1 5 ACRES MINIMUM Note: Pleese refer to the text of the Land Use Element for description of the designated Specific Plan No. 8 area. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 17 Exhibit B -1 (Existing Plan) Moorpark City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) City of Moorpark General Plan Exhibit 5 City of Moorpark ■ ■ ■ NatM ■ .i C." BaMtlary i 1 ■ u. Sm . .' ■ .iaki. Axe LEGEND CURRENT CITY URBAN RESTRICTION BOUNDARY i •� AREA OF INTEREST ."0 Area of Interest •.•'• ■ ............... .. --- .. - -,.• , •............- • City Urban Restriction ■ Boundary (CURB) ....• City of Moorpark ■ ■ ■ NatM ■ .i C." BaMtlary i 1 ■ u. Sm . .' ■ .iaki. Axe LEGEND CURRENT CITY URBAN RESTRICTION BOUNDARY i •� AREA OF INTEREST Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 18 Exhibit B -2 (Proposed Amendment) Moorpark City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) City of Moorpark General Plan Exhibit 5 Area of Interest ■ b Project Site Boundary r ■ ( City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) ; • G_ (proposed) i City Urban Restriction ) Boundary (CURB) (existing) ■ City of Moorpark j .♦ � ,,'_',•; Cary Boundary 00* 2M LEGEND / CITY URBAN RESTRICTION BOUNDARY (CURB) LINE - EXISTING 'J/ CITY URBAN RESTRICTION BOUNDARY (CURB) LINE -PROPOSED ♦� AREA OF INTEREST Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 19 Exhibit C -1 (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Highway Network Figure 2 l T— fROAOWAY t R iROADWAr 41 7 f \ N / �... �..0 fTREET.�._ si..�__ \ fig. �"'•I \ City of Moorpark f i Milo _ v f .. ` NKW P R Sam V. ►OWOEKTER I LO ' ROUTE PARK \ \\ ,• . � COtRfET7EE�R YOIWTAW � Cs �MAL WALNUT /EACX NLL \�n CREEK �I CM OI 1ul tR ►\ ( ul URAIIM ETT D0. �YOUTMTA W � E9 .. =EADOW ��� A� REJAOA City Boundary CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY -- FREEWAY - INTERCHANGE SIX -LANE ARTERIAL FOUR -LANE ARTERIAL R - RURAL COLLECTOR I PC_GNI11 No.th L O tsaE Jfof I $ S.yk.*d LOCAL COLLECTOR ■ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ❑ AT -GRADE RR CROSSING ® GRADE SEPARATED RR CROSSING = = = SR -118 FREEWAY CORRIDOR Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 20 Exhibit C -2 (Proposed Amendment) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Highway Network Figure 2 N RROADWAT EI s� c( City of Moorpark ` ARAUE PARK SRI is 4 RM P 9 ' `.. HIGH .. L .� -� POWDEXTER I ROYTE SARK lAR _ '• wrnR �\ GREER MOUNTAIN O . 1 TRAIL .� ^ WAWIK p �EACR /�1 CREER G CSTIAN luy TRA, ( u RARRETT 00. O M \ ► \M � MEADOW � Eg9A AEJAOA MOUNTAIN l- 'q' CIt Boundary— —" --- CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY FREEWAY INTERCHANGE SIX -LANE ARTERIAL FOUR -LANE ARTERIAL R — RURAL COLLECTOR L LEGEND .Wry North D :soo saro S.knf- LOCAL COLLECTOR ■ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ❑ AT -GRADE RR CROSSING ® GRADE SEPARATED RR CROSSING _ = = SR -118 FREEWAY CORRIDOR Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 21 Exhibit D -1 (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Bikeway Element Figure 3 Sq ; R !RDADWAr \'- - R I City of Moorpark I It ' ' ��� ►OINOEkTM�� / . J %GAEEERT ROUTE I PARK LANI No" eat / , on" Los ANDE -s I 1 � EUTTlR � ♦� 1 CREEK MOUNT— 1� ITRAK WALNUT N 10 ♦ D. 1 I —�� CREEK lyr j ♦ \ i eA nn""Dn. .s"O'U1! AI \IMONTAW` ♦. �` ��� D ��._ `City 9oundary LEGEND CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY tom_, -�.• _J II I SON `= North i U ism R W 1 i°4 m /rsr CLASS I BIKEWAY (BIKE PATH) A facility designed for exclusive use by bicycles and physically separated from vehicular traffic by a barrier, grade separation or open space. Cross -flows by vehicles and pedestrians allowed but minimized. — — — — — — CLASS II BIKEWAY (BIKE LANE) A paved area of roadway designated for preferrential use of bicycles. Pavement markings and signage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway. CLASS III BIKEWAY (BIKE ROUTE) A conventional street where bike routes are indicated by sign only. There are no special pavement walkways and bicycle traffic shares the roadway with motorized traffic. Only Class 111 facilities which connect the Moorpark sphere with the regional bikeway system are identified in the bikeway network. Roadways which are not designated with a Class II bikeway, but which serve as connections between Class II facilities or the regional bikeway system should be considered as Class III bikeways. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 22 Exhibit D -2 (Proposed Amendment) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Bikeway Element Figure 3 �fa LEGEND CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY --- -- --- CLASS I BIKEWAY (BIKE PATH) A facility designed for exclusive use by bicycles and physically separated from vehicular traffic by a barrier, grade separation or open space. Cross -flows by vehicles and pedestrians allowed but minimized. - - - - -- CLASS II BIKEWAY (BIKE LANE) A paved area of roadway designated for preferrential use of bicycles. Pavement markings and signage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway. CLASS III BIKEWAY (BIKE ROUTE) A conventional street where bike routes are indicated by sign only. There are no special pavement walkways and bicycle traffic shares the roadway with motorized traffic. Only Class III facilities which connect the Moorpark sphere with the regional bikeway system are identified in the bikeway network. Roadways which are not designated with a Class 11 bikeway, but which serve as connections between Class II facilities or the regional bikeway system should be considered as Class III bikeways. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 23 Exhibit E -1 (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Equestrian Trail Network Figure 4 .•0000•. •sees• 0 so a sees •• se Ft • ---- r--- .•..,. 0000. ' e0- - -� —_1 � e •e � cw,,. • so so • car.[[* e e e e� �• �� ♦ i � C u... I i • • City of • • Moorpark ! 'j �"M'a.""°" ;- _ •• �' mile —.e • �•� Ala= .♦- ���r °,� WIGH q, ea •� +'`. L0r "INDENT I ROUTE OMN: 1% u"[ • p' • �NITT[RI 000'0'••• •• '�O aC �_- • c•[[[ 1 • ••owrtLw • • • • s e1�1 r0y — � [rroa �..---- �CilyiZndary -- —� - -� • LEGEND I11,� r e *sees EQUESTRIAN TRAILS — - - CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY No.IF u son aum Snfr �n/nr Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 24 Exhibit E -2 (Proposed Amendment) City of Moorpark General Plan Circulation Element, Equestrian Trail Network Figure 4 I �I 1 i 6666• Flo ` ••• •• •••••••••••••• • ••• • 6666• 0� 6000• • as • •i • • I• •• i ; � l;•1 - - CSTREET 000 ; • 6'666• ; • • y /,.; • • City of „i ,\ •• MOOfPBfk `�.CAUM PARK Kam 00 I /. _ 3 � _ ���•••�' �OIMOEET[• �� � • • • tl�.!0A6•EKOIRE� PAKK. • 0- WE AMMUS • ••• •• KK�••••WWTUI ••••••••6 iTb • • • • 17KIAK. WALNUT d ►EACM MLL D. � • ,� Owe+. ��. G1EEK K •�1 �% ' _ice \ �! CKEYTIAM ' •Jul TKL�'- � yl 6MIIETT 011. •, . MEAD” r T KE\ I�EJI o. .— _.— `CityBountlary — _• —.• —. i • 6666• • • �0E ws goo T TOO, ' Noah !s —� SKy4 Kn %nrt LEGEND • • • • • EQUESTRIAN TRAILS - - CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 25 Exhibit F -1 (Existing Plan) City of Moorpark General Plan ("Pen Space, Parks and Recreation Element, Parks and Open Space Areas Figure 3 + t:.�^� .Y: �,Y�J( .!• t. n!'j •i i „•r.l r - ? Op' r r d:. � - t + r wr'F4:t�rJ• S }:�;ilA"��. ©�.ti'�`• • �0 " � '`L` ' .���•1v.;•�` qe t.`, {; ' .:: 1 %^ °oaoo 1 000y �. ;� Q \ o : 4ao� t... o Oj a` ? .j '�`• LEGEND .^. -� ao t Arroyo Simi ':'::,::;1 AG -1 10 -40 scrsslDU � t I EArea of Interest I_ (� Ci(y nark A�!-, •4:1.ecres /DU f- =•i j_� � City U-43 and Sphere of Influence © Moorpark College GS -i 10 -40 acres /DU p� Aoglonai Park OS -2 40 • ecreslDU ►�/ Rural Low - Density ---111 Resolution N-,. P"---'-2004-456 Page 26 Exhibit F-2 (Proposed Amendment) City of Moorpark General Plan ",-)pace, Parks and Recreation Element, -Parks and Open Space Areas Exhibit 5 lic I �80 6000 LEGEND IV a Arroyo Simi AG-1 10-40 acres/DU City Park AG-2 '40-acres/DU Moorpark OS-1 10-40 scree)DU Regional park T- OS-2 40*6Cf93/DU JJ�► Rural Low-Dansily Nature Preserve (0 DU/Acres) IV a Area of Interest City Limits and Sphere of Influence t L Area of Interest City Limits and Sphere of Influence Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 27 EXHIBIT B SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001 -01 (Transmitted to Planning Commission under Separate Cover and Available for Review at the Community Development Department Office) Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 28 EXHIBIT C RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 2001-01 1. The size of the school site should be increased from 12 acres to 18 net usable acres. 2. The size of the day care site should be decreased from 1.6 acres to 0.5 acres to allow for an increased school size. 3. One water tank should be relocated to avoid impacts to the vernal pool watershed. 4. The alignment of Moorpark College Road should be modified and /or the adjacent slope should include the use of walls to prohibit encroachment of grading into the vernal pool watershed. S. A second wildlife crossing should be added under Moorpark College Road. 6. A canyon crossing for Phase A should be relocated to preserve additional trees based on a re- evaluation of the number of living oak trees in the impact area. 7. The middle and western entry cottages should be moved further into the community; the park in PA -11 should be in front of the entry cottage, and the western entry cottage should be moved west to be less visible from public areas. 8. Planning Areas 37 and 38 should be consolidated into one planning area to create a 9.8 -acre publicly accessible lakeside park with a public swim area, restroom and changing facilities, and a public boat rental operation. 9. The Lakeside Neighborhood Center (Planning Area 50) should be moved to the west of the Lakeside Park (Planning Areas 37 and 38 as noted above). 10. Public parking for the Nature Park (Planning Area 11) should be included as a permitted use. 11. The public trail system should be extended to completely loop around the lake as presented to the Planning Commission by the applicant on March 2, 2004, as Option B, with the lakeside alternative on the north side of the lake, using paseos where the trail is not immediately adjacent to the lake. In addition, this lakeside trail should connect to the Planning Area 44 trail head. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 29 12. Mixed uses (residential and commercial) should be provided on Planning Area 50 to shift some of the required affordable housing from Planning Area 9 and allow for market -rate housing opportunities in conjunction with commercial uses. The commercial component of Planning Area 50 should be reduced to a maximum of 45,000 square feet to allow for residential development. 13. Exhibits or references to Planning Area 10 as a Youth Sports Park should be eliminated, with reference only to a Community Park site in the Specific Plan Document and Planning Area 10 should be combined with Planning Area 21, as one Planning Area, to include a minimum of 29.1 usable acres for a Community Park and 18.0 usable acres for a School site. 14. Night lighting, other than security lighting, should not be included as part of the Community Park description in the Specific Plan. Should the City wish to include lighting for nighttime use as part of the park design, this could be addressed at the time of the park design. 15. The Implementation Section should include the establishment of a non - wasting endowment or landscape management district for the ongoing management costs of the Nature Preserve. The Land Use, Grading, and Circulation section should identify Interpretive Facilities to be provided as part of the Nature Preserve. 16. The 33 residential lots in the East Las Posas Groundwater Basin outcrop area should be relocated to Planning Area 31. Planning Area 31 should be designed with either a density higher than 2.9 units per acre, or narrower lots around the lake front in order to provide for a greater variety of housing types in the Specific Plan area. 17. The four -lane access road from the new freeway interchange should be developed as a four -lane arterial with a 14 -foot wide median. 18. A ranch -style home should be included as an architectural style in the Design Guidelines. 19. The existing canyon road through the Unocal site should be available for use during construction activities and be ultimately improved for permanent emergency access. 20. Transit stop locations should be added as part of the improvements to the community park and neighborhood commercial areas. Resolution No. PC- 2004 -456 Page 30 21. The Specific Plan should include a road connection to the western property line as shown in Attachment 1 to the Planning Commission Agenda Report of April 6, 2004 with full access rights given to the City to allow for an option of a roadway connection should the City ever consider the future development of the land west of this Specific Plan project.