HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2000 1016 PR REGMOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Caflfomia 93021
PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA
October 16, 2000
7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
(805) 529 -6864
Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Tina Hare, Tom Pflaumer,
Sandra Thompson, and Chair June Dubreuil.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Staff's Monthly Report.
S. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes
of September 18, 2000. Staff Recommendation: Approve as
presented.
8. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider Revisions to the Citv's Park Improvement Zones.
Staff Recommendation: Forward a recommendation to the
City Council revising the Park Improvement Zones from six
to four (three neighborhood zones and one community -wide
zone) as further identified in Attachment B.
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speaker
Cards must be received by the Recording Secretary prior to the Public Comments portion of the meeting. Speakers will
be heard in the order that their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be imposed upon each
speaker. Copies of the reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on
file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any Agenda item may
be directed to the Community Services Department Secretary, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529-
6864, ext. 227.
PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK CHRISTOPHER EVANS CUNT HARPER DEBBIE RODGERS
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda
October 16, 2000
Page 2
B. Consider the Disposition of the Parkland Fees from the
Archstone Multi- Family Residential Project and Pacific
Communities Single Family Residential Project. Staff
Recommendation: Recommend the following actions to City
Council: 1) Confirm the deposit of 100 percent of the
park fees collected from the Archstone project to the
Community Park Improvement Zone; 2) deposit 80 percent of
the park fees to be collected from the Pacific
Communities project be deposited in the Community Park
Improvement Zone and 20 percent in a future neighborhood
zone; 3) appropriate $120,000 from the Community Zone for
the design and construction of a restroom and concession
facility at AVCP; and 4) indicate intent to allocate $1.2
million to the community pool.
C. Status of Funding From Proposition 12. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
EXHIBIT 14
MINUTES OF THE PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Moorpark, California
1. CALL TO ORDER:
September 18, 2000
Chair Dubreuil called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Hare led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Tina Hare, Thomas
Pflaumer, Sandra Thompson, and Chair June Dubreuil.
Staff Present: Mary Lindley, Director of Community
Services; Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent; and
Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATION, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Staff's Monthly Report.
Mary Lindley gave an oral report. Chair Dubreuil
inquired about the feasibility of eventually including
an equestrian program offered by the City.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of July 17, 2000. Staff Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
B. Parks Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive
and file report.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
September 18, 2000
Page 2
C. Recreation Programming Quarterly Report. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
MOTION: Commissioner Thompson moved to approve the Consent
Calendar as presented. Commissioner Catrambone
seconded. The motion was carried 5 -0.
8. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. July 3rd Fireworks Event Report. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file report.
Gwen Indermill gave a brief overview of this year's 3rd
of July event, stating that is was very successful,
and reviewed the 3rd of July Committee's
recommendations for next year's event.
Commissioner Thompson agreed that the event went very
well, and incorporating the shuttle into next year's
event is an excellent idea.
On behalf of the Commission, Chair Dubreuil thanked
all sponsors for their contributions. She also stated
that she feels all of the Committee's recommendations
for next year's event are very good.
B. Concert Series Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive
and file report.
Gwen Indermill gave a brief report on the final two
Concerts in the Park series.
Chair Dubreuil and Commissioner Thompson both agreed
that for the next Concert series perhaps we couic
include local performers. They could open for the m,ai -:
act, if not performing as the main attraction.
C. Consider Revisions to the Park Rental Policy. StaL_`
Recommendation: Propose the staff recommenced
revisions to the Park Rental Policy for City Council
considerations.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
September 18, 2000
Page 3
Gwen Indermill explained that because of a number of
problems that are developing at the parks, staff has
found it necessary to recommend the following changes
to the Park Rental Policy:
1. Limit rental hours, not to be rented past dusk,
and limit the number of hours of use;
2. Restrict the hours of amplified sound use;
3. Require a security deposit for groups of 50 to
100, and for all rentals involving amplified
sound; and
4. Revise language to include requirements for
decorations, clean up, and special attractions.
Commissioner Pflaumer stated that he is concerned with
the restrooms being closed at dusk, but the park
remaining open to the public until 10:00 p.m.
Mary Lindley explained that the restroon
been locked at dusk. Staff is hoping
issuing a permit past the time when the
closed, will discourage a larger party
until a late hour, which in turn
surrounding residents.
is have always
that by not
restrooms are
from staying
disturbs the
MOTION: Commissioner Catrambone moved to forward staff's
recommended revisions to the Park Rental Policy for
City Council consideration. Commissioner Hare
seconded. The motion was carried 5 -0.
D. Consider a Date for the Fall
Recommendation: Select a Sunday
October to conduct the Fall Park
which parks to include on the tour.
Park Tour. Staff
in the month of
Tour and identify
The Commission decided on Sunday, October 22nd for the
Fall Park Tour.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
September 18, 2000
Page 4
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Mary Lindley announced that the next Youth Sports Committee
meeting will be held on October 23.
Chair Dubreuil requested an update on the status of
Proposition 12 funding. She also reminded the Commission
that the City Council will be discussing the Park
Improvement Zones at their September 20th meeting.
10. ADJOURDIl4ENT
Chair Dubreuil adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. until the
next meeting of October 16, 2000.
APPROVED:
JUNE DUBREUIL, CHAIRMAN
Respectfully submitted:
Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary
n
EXHIBIT q.
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community ServicesV�0
DATE: October 5, 2000 (Meeting of October 16, 2000)
SUBJECT: Consider Revisions to the City's Park Improvement
Zones
SUMMARY
On September 20, the City Council directed
Recreation Commission be asked to consider
to the existing Park Improvement Zones.
Commission is being asked to forward a reco
the number and boundaries of the zones
consideration.
BACKGROUND
that the Parks and
potential revisions
As a result, the
mmendation regarding
for City Council
The City has six Park Improvement Zones, five neighborhood zones
and one community zone (see Attachment A). The Zones were set up
by the City Council in 1986 to account for the collection of
park fees in lieu of land dedication, consistent with the Quimby
Act for said Quimby fees on residential subdivisions. The state
requirements for the expenditure of Quimby in -lieu fees are: 1)
they must be expended to benefit residents of the subdivision;
and 2) be obligated within five years of receipt.
In 1985, the City Attorney advised the Council that to meet
obligation 1 above, the City could spend funds on either
community facilities, or for a park that serves the residents of
the particular subdivision from where the fees are derived.
M:\MLindley\PARKS \park improvement zones commagd.doc
Park Improvement Zone Revisions
Page 2
Prior to the City's enactment of the Quimby Act, the Council
enacted the County's Subdivision Ordinance, which included a
section on parkland dedication, and subsequently enacted park
fees for apartment, mobile home, commercial and industrial
projects.
The fees collected from the Quimby requirements on apartments
and non - residential projects comprise the City's Park
Improvement Fund. The Council adopted a policy in which 60% of
fees collected in the Park Improvement Fund would be used for
neighborhood park facilities and 40% for community park
facilities. This policy remains in place today.
DISCUSSION
Due to the relatively small geographic size of the current
zones, and the ease in which Moorpark residents make use of the
parks throughout the City, staff is proposing that the Council
consider expanding the size and reducing the number of the
neighborhood zones. This is also consistent with the Park
Assessment District Engineer's report that establishes one
District based on the finding that all residents benefit from,
and have a use impact on, each of the City parks.
Staff has developed a potential option for revising the existing
zone configuration that takes the number of neighborhood zones
from five to three and retains the one community zone. The
neighborhood zones would basically encompass the following
geographical areas: 1) Central Moorpark, the downtown area,
north of Los Angeles Avenue and west of the 23 freeway; 2)
Mountain Meadows, Peach Hill and Carlsberg Specific Plan area
and all areas south of Los Angeles Avenue; and 3) the Campus
area, and all areas east of the 23 freeway (see Attachment B).
At this time, the proposal excludes the Gabbert Road area and
the adjacent Specific Plans to the north (Toll Brothers and West
Point) from any neighborhood zone. If this proposal were to be
adopted by the Council at a later date, it would mean that 100
percent of the park improvement fees collected from those
developments would be deposited in the Community Zone.
M: \MLindley \PARKS \park improvement zones commagd.doc
Park Improvement Zone Revisions
Page 3
This is the option staff favors. However, the Commission may
wish to consider other options as well, such as retaining the
current number of zones (six) or redrawing the zone boundaries.
STAFF RECOMENDATION
Forward a recommendation to the City Council revising the Park
Improvement Zones from six zones to four (three neighborhood
zones and one community -wide zone) as further identified in
Attachment B.
M: \MLindley \PARKS \park improvement zones commagd.doc
1�
- - -
.,, • �' i
1 �
- 1 t: � Kritas 7��•
' MOORP RK
M ORPARK
ONALD EAAGAN \ - -
1 1 r
1
1 1 p
I ✓JC a. ;
I' �uil Inm st i £ �e n ; ; -
'f� acl•u 8
I ,.. owns � :, ,.`•w„ ,,✓'= -- --- s•. _ -� -' I
f aac .
, 6rl-
AV
M ? -
MW
o
MUORPARK
r�l.r '1!•� �5 1 F I
- w u � � T r � i? - �, •� uw � nu
i a "`_ �s�c J ,• ..u,a '° •'� TIERRA
wu, � Iws I u
r• , 1
Ir ^'lam n •i - ' r - ♦rw� •' -s,a - �`�� � � � i d - ZTC'tIL --- �`�J�� 6•
w�'+ -`t• y. 1� ♦ ` '•1'(' T.- _��. ``17 ..y `aL �� MAA'Tl' -�r- r
.j• 1.,..... `' 1' r :.;Ir "` (`X —T{ 'CY ° \ (n,' 7 0.EJaW _ _ 1 y a owu AfA(-
Y ti� 1.� >• ' +'1� ;:\ _1 l\..� "•YV+ tr * :��. I ,11� - �flfX /fIN (1
C AC1 ,`) j I e
Zcv,c 5 t Zon
IS
PMK
F-
Al
W. . . . . . . . . .
-J lli"4AA A A, A A,
vp
1rr�1�1 ��'
TV
Zo/k iE 'TIT
0.5
1.0
APPRO)OWTE SCiE N UILES
r
EXHIBIT
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
9,-6
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services;cl
DATE: October 5, 2000 (Meeting of October 16, 2000)
SUBJECT: Consider the Disposition of the Parkland Fees from the
Archstone Multi - Family Residential Project and Pacific
Communities Single Family Residential Project
BACKGROUND
The City currently has six Park Improvement Zones; five
neighborhood zones and one community zone (see Attachment A) .
The Zones were set up to account for the collection of park fees
in lieu of land dedication, consistent with the Quimby Act for
said Quimby fees on residential subdivisions. The state
requirements for the expenditure of Quimby in -lieu fees are: 1)
they must be expended to benefit residents of the subdivision;
and 2) be obligated within five years of receipt.
The fees collected for Quimby (residential subdivisions) , and on
apartments and non - residential projects, comprise the City's
Park Improvement Fund. The Council adopted a policy in which 600
of fees collected within a Park Improvement Zone would be used
for neighborhood park facilities and 40% for community park
facilities. This policy remains in place today.
All properties within Moorpark fall within the Community -wide
Zone, however, the neighborhood zones do not extend to every
parcel in the City. As a result, some past and future
development projects do not currently fall within a neighborhood
Park Improvement Zone.
On September 20, the City Council directed that the Parks and
Recreation Commission forward a recommendation on the
disposition of park improvement fees for two development
M:\MLindley\PARKS\Archstone Pacif Com Park fee commagd.doc
Achstone and Pacific Communities Park Fees
Page 2
projects which are not currently located within a Neighborhood
Park Improvement Zone: 1) Archstone (RPD 97 -01), 312 apartment
units, and 2) Pacific Communities (Tract 5053 and 5204), 284
single - family detached units.
The City received $936,000 from Archstone, all of which was
deposited in the Community -wide Park Improvement Zone. Based on
current land values, it is estimated that the City will receive
approximately $1.4 million in park fees from Pacific
Communities.
Staff recommends that all of the park fees collected from
Archstone remain in the Community -wide Improvement Zone.
Additionally, it is recommended that 80 percent of the future
park fees from Pacific Communities be deposited in the
Community -wide Zone and 20 percent in the newly revised
neighborhood zone in which it is proposed to reside. Just as
with the Archstone development project, the Pacific Communities
project currently does not fall within an existing neighborhood
zone. With Pacific Communities' project in close proximity to
the AVCP Pedestrian Bridge, it is staff's belief that AVCP will
generally serve as a neighborhood park for the project's
residents, as well as Villa Campesina Park. Once the process for
revising the park improvement zones has been completed, it is
anticipated that 20 percent of the park fees will be deposited
in the appropriate neighborhood zone.
Use of Community Zone Funds
The current fund balance in the Community Park Improvement Zone
is approximately 1 million. However, it's important to note that
the Zone owes $310,000 to other park zones, and $176,000 to the
General Fund (tennis courts). The matter of the outstanding
loans in the Community Zone will be addressed when the Council
is asked to take action on the reconfiguration of the zones at a
later date.
If the Commission and the City Council approve staff's proposed
recommendation regarding the disposition of Park Improvement
Fees from Archstone and Pacific Communities, it is estimated
that the fund balance in the Community Park Improvement Zone
will shortly be approximately 2.2 million, less the
aforementioned $486,000 in loans. With the completion of the
Achstone and Pacific Communities Park Fees
Page 3
Master Plan for AVCP, it would be appropriate to begin
concentrating on the construction of desired capital projects.
Starting with the estimated future fund balance of 2.2 million,
it is suggested that the Parks and Recreation Commission
recommend that the City Council set aside $120,000 for the
design and construction of the restroom and concession stand
facility to be located near the football field.
In addition to the actual design and construction of the
facility, this project will have to include grading, drainage
and installation or extension of utilities and other related
work, which will have to be designed before completing the
design of the restroom /concession stand. As a result, additional
money will have to be spent first before the restroom /concession
stand can be designed and constructed. It is anticipated that
the City will have to install a larger potable water line, which
will most likely include additional water fees. This matter must
be resolved first before construction of the amenities in the
undeveloped portion of the park. It is recommended that $800,000
be earmarked to complete the grading, irrigation, and
hydroseeding of the remainder of the park.
Lastly, it is recommended that the Commission request that
Council indicate its intent to allocate 1.2 million from the
future Community Zone fund balance for the community pool
project.
STAFF RECObWENDATION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission forward the following
recommended actions to the City Council:
1. Confirm the deposit of 100 percent of the park fees
collected from the Archstone project to the Community
Park Improvement Zone;
2. Deposit 80 percent of the park fees to be collected
from the Pacific Communities project be deposited in
the Community Park Improvement Zone and 20 percent in
a future neighborhood zone;
Achstone and Pacific Communities Park Fees
Page 4
3. Appropriate $120,000 from the Community Zone for the
design and construction of a restroom and concession
facility at AVCP; and
4. Indicate intent to allocate $1.2 million to the
community pool.
C
G�
II
I
.~ • pp
I
1
I
r
^"rte
,�\ �P .�• fin.
l
--
-`►"
�l I
•
1
1
I
EAGM ^r
c.ugi
A' -
• � �
� � �\
r
� � �
CIS e
<*
f �'4� 4�
-
•
\l�u -il
x4a 6
a
OtIIR7 -)
L �
in !s °!.
n r ni' C•. ,�
ffq
icrn.
dOw IMf
i i `s
l x`
�\
<"'♦ I
r I
r
LES
�I
I
OvAr[S
� 1 '•<
A.
_ -
^ \
� I
Zorn
ll�y l
U i
3I —. _^
Safi
Isl
�■ �Fi. -
- xr (
;r•u,rnixvi
II AhGLi
-
MO'CIRPARK
Mill
a
rM. WILL
TIERM
L
�
l'!Iq!]
•
4
^ -
1e y,�,yf��Nt
y, . r . . • �,f -
� i _
III fO..
�
I
-.,+f
r
Wf
.,..���•.
,<•
9 «.w XA,r` T>^.Sr
�` \.r
yM.i ,1•- 1
it V� V w,r�. _ -
mil\
°.ua� '- � °\. � f �%
__
f�n� h t;l lii� «1++i11Ft►41�Nllf/
+1ltfMN{f+
=�
',,
nufra.rurrra,.
I
tXHIBIT
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA REPORT
The Parks & Recreation Commission
Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent
October 10, 2000 (Meeting of October 16, 2000)
Proposition 12 Funding Status Report
G
At the January 24, 2000 meeting, staff presented a report on the
Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act, called Proposition 12. As the Commission is
aware, this Park Bond passed during the March 7th California State
ballot and will provide funding to local governments, based on
population to develop, improve, and maintain parks. Additionally,
Proposition 12 provides for one -time per capita funding as well as
competitive grant funding opportunities for park improvements,
trails, and historic preservation.
The purpose of this program is to improve the quality of life by
providing cleaner air and water, recreational opportunities, safe
places for children to play, and new wildlife preserves in
California. Proposition 12 will also provide funding for safe
neighborhood parks and for programs, to give youth safe
recreational alternatives to gang, drug, and other inappropriate
behavior.
DISCUSSION
As the Commission recalls, The City of Moorpark is estimated to
benefit from Prop 12 per- capita direct allocation, based on a
population of 29,600, as follows:
Roberti- Z'berg- Harris Urban Open -Space
and Recreation Program $ 97,680
Per Capita Program I $185,000
Per - Capita II, Small Cities .$ 79,920
TOTAL $362,600
prop 12 update
Funding for these grants will become available during fiscal year
2001 -02, (Attachment A) . The Per capita program funds will be
distributed by early spring 2001, pending population verification
from census results.
Attached to this Agenda Report is some additional Proposition 12
reference materials. The CPRS Fact Sheet, Bond funding available
under Prop 12, and Estimates of Per - Capital Grants Available.
STAFF RECOM14ENDATION
Receive and file.
H:\ home_folders \GIndermill \M \Admin \Commission Reports \2000 \prop 12 update.doc
prop 12 update
CAPITOL OFFICE:
STATE CAPITOL
P.O. BOX 942649
SACRAMENTO, CA 94249 -0037
(916) 319 -2037
FAX: (916) 319.2137
DISTRICT OFFICE:
221 E. DAILY DRIVE X7
CAMARILLO, CA 93010
(805) 987 -5195
FAX: (805)484.0853
EMAIL:
assemblymember.smcldarW OasseT4y.ca.gov
August 23, 2000
Honorable Patrick Hunter
799 Moorpark Ave
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dear Mayor Hunter:
ATTACHMENT
Uitfurnin 'Xgisla#urr
J �L
•
TONY STRICKLAND
ASSEMBLYMAN, THIRTY-SEVENTH DISTRICT
MINORITY "IP
COMMITTEES:
CO- CHAIRMAN
LEGISLATIVE ETHICS
VICE - CHAIRMAN
GOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATION
MEMBER
BUDGET
INSURANCE
SUBCOMMITTEE
SEXUALHARASSMENT
PREVENTION
SELECT COMMITTEES
AEROSPACEINDUSTRY
CALIFORNIA PORTS
CONSTRUCTION FRAUD
MINORITY TASK FORCE
EDUCATION
As you may recall, earlier this year I sent to you a list of programs provided in
Proposition 12, the Park Bond. This list included program names and descriptions,
available funding levels, oversight agencies and the eligible entities that may seek the
funding. Enclosed is an updated version of these programs for your review.
I hope you find this information useful. If you have any questions regarding any
of these programs or any other state - related issues, please feel free to contact me at (916)
319 -2037.
Sincerely,
TONY STRICKLAND
Assemblyman, 37`h District
Printed on Recycled Pane,
REC E
AUG 2
CITY CLERK'S DE
CITY OF MCOFiP
Program
Description
Anrount
Agency
Contact
Eligibility
Application
Person
Deadline
State Parks Program
Funding for general rehabilitation, restoration,
$415,000,000
Department of Parks and
Mark Schrader
State park units
No competitiv
improvement, and development of existing DPR
Recreation
(916)
process
units, facilities and trails, to acquire inholdings and
www.cal- parks.ca.gov
657 -2288
adjacent lands, and for air quality improvement
projects at state park units.
Per Capita Grant
Grants for the acquisition, development,
$388,000,000
Department of Parks and
Odel King
Cities, counties, and
To go our
Program
rehabilitation, and restoration of park and recreation
Recreation
(916)
special park districts
Jan. `01
areas and facilities.
www.cal-parks.ca.gov
653 -7423
Roberti- Z'Berg-
Grants for the acquisition, development,
$200,000,000
Department of Parks and
Odel King
Cities, counties and
Fiscal Year
Harris Program
rehabilitation, and restoration of park and recreation
Recreation
(916)
districts
2001 -02
areas and facilities.
www.cal-parks.ca.gov
653 -7423
Murray- Hayden
Grants for park, youth center, and environmental
$50,000,000
Department of Parks and
Odel King
Public agencies and
TBA
Low Income
enhancement projects that benefit youth in areas
Recreation
(916)
nonprofit organizations
Recreation Facilities
lacking safe neighborhood parks, open space, and
www.cal- parks.ca.gov
653 -7423
Program
natural areas with significant poverty.
Agricultural Land
Grants for farmland protection and the placement of
$20,000,000
Department of Conservation
Luree Stetson
State and local agencies
Apps. are
Stewardship
improvements and acquisition of agricultural
www.consrv.ca.gov
(916)
and nonprofit
accepted on
Program
conservation easements and other interests in land.
322 -1080
organizations
ongoing basis
Locally operated
$20 million for grants to local entities that operate
$20,000,000
Department of Parks and
Mark Schrader
State park units and local
Fiscal Year
state parks program
DPR -owned park units for the development,
Recreation
(916)
agencies administering
2001 -02
improvement, rehabilitation, restoration,
www.cal- parks.ca.gov
657 -2288
state park units
enhancement, protection, and interpretation of lands
and facilities and improved access.
Stewardship
_
$18 million for cultural and natural resources
_
$18,000,000
Department of Parks and
Mark Schrader
State park units
TBA
Program
"stewardship" projects that protect, preserve,
Recreation
(916)
This fiscal yeas
rehabilitate, restore, and improve natural systems
www.cal- parks.ca.gov
657 -2288
and outstanding features of the state park system,
historical and cultural resources, and promote a
eater understanding of California's past.
Youth
Grants for regional youth soccer and baseball
$600,000
Department of Parks and
Odel King
Nonprofit organizations
Fiscal Year
Soccer/Baseball
facilities operated by nonprofit organizations.
Recreation
(916)
and local agencies
2001 -02
Facilties Program
www.cal-parks.ca.gov
653 -7423
Disadvantaged
Grants for certified local community conservation
$12,500,000
California Conservation Corps
Julie Cobbs
Local conservation corps
Fall 2000
Youth Program
corps program to complete capital outlay and
www.ccc.ca.gov
(916)
resource conservation projects.
341 -3153
California Heritage
$10 million in competitive grants for the acquisition,
$10,000,000
State Office of Historic
Dan Abeyta
Cities, counties, districts,
Fiscal Year
Fund
development, rehabilitation, restoration, and
Preservation
(916)
local jpa's, and nonprofit
2001 -02
interpretation of historical resources.
www.oh park.ca.gov
653 -9754
organizations
Urban Streams
Grants designed to improve water quality, flood
$10,000,000
Department of Parks and
Odel King
Local agencies and
Fiscal Year
Program
carrying capacity, and recreational benefits of urban
Recreation
(916)
nonprofits
2001 -02
www.cal-parks.ca.gov
653 -7423
Urban forestry
Grants for the purchase and planting of trees and up
$10,000,000
Department of Forestry and
Mark Stanley
Cities, counties, districts,
July 2001
Prograin
to three years of care to ensure long -terra viability.
Fire Protection
(916)
and nonprofit
www.frre
653 -4995
organizations
parks.ca.gov 657 -2288 areas
habitat 7lie IiCF Program requires local matching funds for $2,000,000 Department of Parks and Odel King Cities, counties and
Conservation Fund projects that protect: a) Deer /Mountain Lion Recreation, www.cal- (916) districts
Program Habitat, b) Rare, Threatened, Endangered or Fully parks.ca.gov 653 -7423
Protected Species, c) Wetlands Habitat, d) Riparian
Habitat.
>cal 1'
001 u
ical 1'.
001 -o
ical Y�
00 1 -0
to Vo
lov 'o(-
e Jan
TBA
cal Y.•
)01 -0
a
Grants for urban recreational and cultural centers, $
_ca,&ov /urban forestry.html _
Urban Recreation G
$7,865,000 D
Department of Parks and O
_
Cities, counties, and F
Fi5
and Cultural Center i
including zoos, musuems, aquariums, and facilities R
Recreation (
(916) n
nonprofit organizations
Program f
for wildlife, environmental, or natural science 6
653 -7423
aquatic education or projects combining curation of w
www.cal- parks.ca.gov
archaeological, paleontological, and historic
resources with education and basic applied research.
Dr. Paul Chaffee G
Grants for the development, rehabilitation, or $
$5,865,000 D
Department of Parks and O
Odel King C
Cities, counties, and F
Fi!
Zoological Program r
restoration of facilities accredited by the American R
Recreation, www.cal- (
(916) n
nonprofit organizations 2
2
Zoo and Aquarium Association. p
parks.ca.gov 6
653 -7423
Non - motorized Trail D
Development, improvement, rehabilitation, $
$1,700,000 D
Department of Parks and F
Fiscal Year C
Cities, counties, districts, F
Fis
Program r
restoration, enhancement, and interpretation of R
Recreation, www.cal- 2
2001 -02 l
local jpa's, excluding 2
2
nonmotorized trails for the purpose of increasing p
parks.ca.gov s
school districts
public access to, and enjoyment of, public areas for
increased recreation. _
_
Playground G
Grants for the improvement or replacement of $
$7,000,000 C
California Integrated Waste M
Mark Leary L
Local agencies R
RFP
Improvement p
playground equipment or facilities with recycled M
Management Board (
(916) N
N
Program m
materials. _
_ 2
255 -2313 D
Du
Waterfowl Habitat F
Funds for the development, enhancement, $
$5,000,000 D
Department of Fish and R
Ron Pelzman N
Nonprofit organizations I
I r t
Project /Duck Stamp r
restoration, and preservation of land for waterfowl G
Game, www.dlg.ca.gov (
(916)
_
Program _
_ habitat. _ _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ 6
653 -9683
Volunteer Program $
Donna Pozzi N
Nonprofit organizations
enhance volunteer participation in the state park R
Recreation, www.cal- (
(916) f
for u within state park
.stcm _ _ _
parks.ca.gov 6
653 -4643 u
units
_- p
Visitor Center $
$2.6 million to build visitor centers in state parks, $
Department of Parks and M
Mark Schrader S
State parks, state historic F
Fis
Program s
state historic parks, and state recreation areas. R
Recreation, www.cal- (
(916) p
parks or state recreation 2
2(
>cal 1'
001 u
ical 1'.
001 -o
ical Y�
00 1 -0
to Vo
lov 'o(-
e Jan
TBA
cal Y.•
)01 -0
a