HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2000 0207 PR REGMOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA
February 7, 2000
7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Tina Hare, Tom Pflaumer,
Sandra Thompson, and Chair June Dubreuil.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Consider Nomination and Selection of Chair and Vice
Chair.
B. Staff's Monthly Report.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes
of January 3, 2000. Staff Recommendation: Approve as
presented.
B. Recreation Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file report.
C. Parks Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and
file report.
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comment portion of the agenda Speaker Cards must be
received by the Recording Secretary prior to the Public Comments portion of the meeting. Speakers will be heard in the order that
their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. Copies of the reports or other
written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available
for public review. Any questions concerning any Agenda item may be directed to the Community Services Department Secretary,
799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -6864, ext. 227.
PATRICK HUNTER JOHN E. WOZNIAK CHRISTOPHER EVANS CUNT HARPER DEBBIE RODGERS
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda
February 7, 2000
Page 2
B. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider Adjustment in Fee Schedule for Tennis Court
Rental. Staff Recommendation: Approve a revision of
Resolution 98 -1523, adopting a revised fee schedule for
the use of all City tennis court facilities, as
identified on Attachment B. (continued from January 3,
2000.)
B. Review of Proposition 12: Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean
Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of
2000. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report.
C. Select Two Parks and Recreation Commissioners to Serve on
an Ad Hoc Committee to Select a Name For the Park in
Specific Plan 92 -1 (Carlsberg) . Staff Recommendation:
Select two Commissioners to serve on an Ad Hoc Committee
to work with the Centennial Committee on selecting a name
for the park in Specific Plan 92 -1 (Carlsberg).
D. Update from the July 3rd Advisory Committee: Staff
Recommendation: Committee members to give oral report.
E. Consider Selection of Two Commissioners to Serve on the
Youth Sports Committee. Staff Recommendation: Select two
Commissioners to serve on the Youth Sports Committee.
F. Consider Date for Spring Park Tour. Staff Recommendation:
Select a date in March or April for Spring Park Tour.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Moorpark, California
1. CALL TO ORDER:
January 3, 2000
Chair Dubreuil called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Hare led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Tina Hare, Thomas
Pflaumer and Chair June Dubreuil. Commissioner Sandra
Thompson was absent.
Staff Present: Mary Lindley, Director of Community
Services; Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent; and
Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATION, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
Staff's Monthly Report.
Mary Lindley gave an oral report.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
6. PUBLIC COMPUMS :
None.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of November 1, 1999. Staff Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
B. Approval of the City Council and Parks and Recreation
Commission Joint Meeting Minutes. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
January 3, 2000
Page 2
C. Halloween Party and Trick or Treat Village Status
Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report.
D. Holiday Craft Faire Status Report. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
MOTION: Commissioner Catrambone moved to approve the Consent
Calendar as presented. Commissioner Hare seconded. The
motion was carried 4 -0. Commissioner Thompson was
absent.
B. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider Tennis Court Rental Fees and Procedures.
Staff Recommendation: Provide a recommendation to the
City Council on tennis court rental fees and
procedures.
Ms. Indermill gave a brief review of the proposed
rates for the City and the current rates being used in
surrounding cities. She explained that staff's
recommendation will amend the existing resolution,
reducing the hourly fee and including a policy stating
that a total of only six courts can be rented at AVCP
by one particular group, leaving two open courts at
all times for public use.
There were three public speakers:
1) Mr. Robert Pereira, President of the Moorpark Tennis
Club, stated that he feels the proposed hourly rate
for the City's non - profit organizations is too high if
applied when tournaments are scheduled. The Moorpark
Tennis Club will be unable to utilize the courts for
tournaments if the proposed fee is adopted.
2) Annette Broersma, 720 Woodlawn Drive, Thousand Oaks,
stated that she has been a member of the United States
Tennis Association for years and also a tennis
instructor. It has been her experience that fees
charged for rentals have differed depending on the
organization and type of rental taking place.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
January 3, 2000
Page 3
Ms. Lindley stated that City policy does not allow for
staff to adjust rental fees on a case to case basis,
and the proposed tennis court rental fees are
comparable to the rates used for rental of other City
facilities, such as soccer fields, softball fields,
etc.
Ms. Lindley also reminded the Commission that the item
up for discussion was a proposed rental rate of the
tennis courts for the public, and did not include
establishing a separate rate for the Moorpark Tennis
Club's use of the courts for tournaments.
3) Dr. Roseann Mikos, 14371 E. Cambridge Street,
Moorpark, stated that she also feels the proposed fees
for rental are high if applied to tournament rentals.
Commissioner Hare suggested the idea of charging a
flat fee for court use and not an hourly rate. She
stated that she does not feel comfortable with the
recommended rates.
Commissioner Pflaumer stated that perhaps the Moorpark
Tennis Club should establish an agreement with the
City for court use, as other sports organizations have
done for their seasonal use of the fields and gym.
Commissioner Catrambone is
proposed court rates are
fees charged, and both
organizations need to pay
upkeep of park facilities.
of the opinion that the
in line with other rental
the public and sports
a fee to help maintain the
Chair Dubreuil offered a few suggestions on different
fee structures and stated that guidelines need to be
established as far as what qualifies as a City non-
profit organization.
The Commission agreed to table this item and requested
staff to present another proposed fee schedule
reflecting a "tournament fee" classification.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
January 3, 2000
Page 4
MOTION: Commissioner Hare moved to have staff develop a
tournament rental rate and policy for Moorpark non-
profit organizations for review at the next Parks and
Recreation Commission meeting. Commissioner Pflaumer
seconded. The motion was carried 4 -0. Commissioner
Thompson was absent.
B. Consider Playground Equipment Design for Campus Canyon
Park. Staff Recommendation: Approve the playground
equipment design recommended by the ad hoc committee
(Attachment A) .
Ms. Lindley presented two diagrams displaying the play
equipment recommended by the ad hoc committee. She
also explained that ADA surfacing would be installed,
with wood chips or sand as the two options.
MOTION: Commissioner Hare moved to approve the playground
equipment design recommended by the ad hoc committee.
Commissioner Catrambone seconded. The motion was
carried 4 -0. Commissioner Thompson was absent.
C. Appoint Two Commissioners to the July 3rd Event
Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation: Select two
Parks and Recreation Commissioners to serve on the
July 3rd Event Advisory Committee.
Ms. Lindley explained that a notice will go out to the
public inviting volunteers to serve on the Advisory
Committee. The first meeting is scheduled for January
12, at 4:00 p.m.
CONSENSUS: A consensus was reached to have Commissioner
Catrambone and Chair Dubreuil serve on the July 3rd
Event Advisory Committee.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Chair Dubreuil requested that an overview of Proposition 12
be placed on February's agenda, to explain how it may
affect the City of Moorpark.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
January 3, 2000
Page 5
10. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Dubreuil adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m. until the
next regularly scheduled meeting of February 7, 2000.
APPROVED:
JUNE DUBREUIL
Respectfully submitted, CHAIRMAN
Patty Lemcke
Administrative Secretary
�aa r 7 �
.s • L
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Kueny, City Manager
FROM: Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent
DATE: January 13, 1999
SUBJECT: Quarterly Report on Recreation Programming
Fall Quarter: September December 1999
This memo serves as a review and analysis of fall 1999 Recreation division programs as well as a comparison to last
year's Fall season. Winter 1998 was the first full season where figures were kept on Recware. Therefore, there are
instances in this report where accurate figures for last year are not available. These programs fall into the
subcategories of events, classes, youth sports, adult sports, teens, brochure, park reservations and facility
reservations.
FALL EVENTS
Halloween
Participants
Volunteers
1999 1998 1997
600 500 700
50 75 30
Direct Costs
$858
$546
$1070
Part Time Staff Costs
$148
$78
$215
Total Costs
$1007
$624
$1285
Total Revenue
$1251
$950
$495
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$245
$326
($790)
Direct Cost Per Participant
$1.43
$1.09
$1.53
Total Cost Per Participant
$1.68
$1.25
$1.84
Revenue Per Participant
$2.09
$1.90
$0.70
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$0.41
$.65
($1.13)
Coordinator Hours
60
75
60
Event Review: Attendance increased relative to last year's figures. As in past years, the event included the Trick or
Treat Village, carnival games, Halloween crafts, pony rides, and a jolly jump. A free magic show was added this
year. Funds to cover expenses were raised through ticket sales and donations by Kavlico and Anderson Rubbish.
The City distributed activity passes to Catholic Charities so disadvantaged children in the community could
participate in the event. Kiwanis also paid for and supplied passes to disadvantaged youth.
Craft Fair
1999
1998
1997
Number of Vendors
67
60
60
Participants
800
500
350
Direct Costs
$581
$443
$478
Part Time Staff Costs
$51
$108
$53
Total Costs
$633
$551
$532
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report. Recreation Division
Page 1
Total Revenue
$2700
$2,585
$2,400
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$2067
$2,034
$1,868
Direct Cost Per Participant
$0.72
$0.88
$1.37
Total Cost Per Participant
$0.79
$1.10
$1.52
Revenue Per Participant
$3.36
$5.17
$6.85
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$2.58
$4.06
$5.33
Net (Cost) /Revenue Per Vendor
$30.85
$33.90
$31.13
Coordinator Hours
50
45
50
Event Review: This event ran as smoothly as it has in past years. Entertainment provided by local groups was added
to the event this year. Moorpark Star provided free display advertisements for this event in exchange for a booth
space.
Tea Time With Santa
1999
1998
1997
Participants
68
76
75
Direct Costs
$330
$242
$397
Part Time Staff Costs
$70
$73
$62
Total Costs
$400
$315
$459
Total Revenue
$406
$380
$576
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$6.00
$65
$117
Direct Cost Per Participant
$4.85
$3.18
$5.29
Total Cost Per Participant
$5.88
$4.14
$6.12
Revenue Per Participant
$5.97
$5
$7.68
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$0.08
$.85
$1.56
Coordinator Hours
21
28
25
Event Review_ This program was redesigned in 1999 to replace Breakfast with Santa. Registrations for this event
fell slightly in it's second year. The event included crafts, refreshments, and a photo with Santa. The use of a
professional camera and film were donated by Cherry Hill Photography.
Visits With Santa
Participants (Families)
Volunteers
Direct Costs
Part Time Staff Costs
Total Costs
Total Revenue
Net (Cost)/Revenue
Direct Cost Per Family
Total Cost Per Family
Revenue Per Family
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Family
Coordinator Hours
1999 1998 1997
Not Offered 24 Not Offered
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 2
$200
$129
$330
$625
$295
$8.33
$13.70
$26.04
$12.29
21
Event Review: This event was discontinued.
1999
Santa's Sleigh Rides
1999
1998 1997
Participants (Families)
248
Not offered 169
Direct Costs
$867
$752
Part Time Staff Costs
$40
$0
Total Costs
$907
$752
Total Revenue
$2024
$1352
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$1117
$600
Direct Cost Per Participant
$3.50
$4.45
Total Cost Per Participant
$3.66
$4.45
Revenue Per Participant
$8.16
$8.00
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$4.50
$3.55
Coordinator Hours
30
not available
Event Review: This program was re- established (from 1997) due to requests from the residents. This program is
extremely popular, with nine out of ten available time slot filling to capacity this year. The sleigh and picnic area
were contracted through Tierra Rejada Family Farms.
WINTER CAMP
Winter Camp
1999
1998 1997
Participants
49
46 Not offered
Volunteers
0
2
Average Campers Per Day
28
30
Direct Costs
$1467
$1,095
Part Time Staff Costs
$2713
$1,786
Total Costs
$4180
$2,881
Total Revenue
$5800
$4,517
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$1620
$1,635
Direct Cost Per Participant
$29.91
$23.80
Total Cost Per Participant
$85.30
$62.63
Total Revenue Per Participant
$118.37
$98.19
Net Revenue Per Participant
$33.06
$35.54
Coordinator Hours (approximate)
42
45
Program Review: This is the second year winter camp has run successfully. Average daily attendance dropped
slightly, due to low attendance on Friday, December 24 (eight campers) and Friday, December 31 (nine campers).
Monday through Thursday, camp attendance ranged from 29 to 39 campers per day with an average attendance of
thirty- three, which reflects a slight increase over last year.
FALL CLASSES
Recreational Classes 1999 1998 1997
Total Students 784 449 365
Classes Offered 96 65 107
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 3
Classes That Ran
Classes Canceled
Instructor payments
Supplies
Total Direct Costs
Total Revenue
Refunds and credits
Net (Cost) /Revenue
Direct Cost Per Participant
Total Revenue Per Participant
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
Coordinator Hours (approximate)
84
12 (12 %)
$21,827
$29
$21,856
$42,660
$4207
$16,597
$27.88
$54.41
$21.16
51
61
8 (12'%
$9,504
$0
59,504
$17,592
51,688
S6,400
$21.17
$39.18
$14.25
40
89
18 (16 %)
1997 financial data not available
Program Review: Class registrations increased dramatically in 1999. in addition to a greater number of classes being
offered, more classes filled to capacity. The cancellation rate remains steady at 12 %.
FALL ADULT LEAGUES
Softball
Teams
Supply Costs
Facility Costs (Lights)
Total Direct Costs
Part Time Staff Costs
Total Costs
Total Revenue
Net (Cost)/Revenue
Direct Cost Per Team
Total Cost Per Team
Total Revenue Per Team
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Team
Coordinator Hours
1999
34
$3,607
$1,624
$5,231
$1,476
$6,707
$11,571
$4,864
$154
$197
$340
$143
40
1998
27
$2,557
$1,598
$4,155
$937
$5,092
$9,172
$4,080
$154
$189
$340
$151
45
1997
30
1997 financial data not available
Program Review: The Adult Softball program has seen an increase in total registration and revenue over the past
season compared to past fall leagues. As noted above, all costs (direct and indirect) continue to be covered by this
program and net revenues per team remained steady.
Basketball
Teams
1999 1998
12 10
Supply Costs
$563
Facility Costs (Lights)
$75
Facility Costs (Gym at $12 per hour)
$1,200
Total Direct Costs
$1,838
Part Time Staff Costs
$1,250
Total Costs
$3,088
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 4
$504
$41
$960
$1,505
$1,354
$2,859
1997
12
1997 Financial data not available
Total Revenue
$3,749
$3,170
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$661
$311
Direct Cost Per Team
$153
$151
Total Cost Per Team
$257
$286
Total Revenue Per Team
$312
$317
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Team
$55
$31
Coordinator Hours
30
24
Program Review: The total costs for this program include a cost for the use of the gymnasium, which is calculated at
an overhead rate of $12 per hour. This is the rate other agencies are billed to use this facility. Even when this
overhead calculation is included, this program covers all costs and remained steady over the past season.
Women's League
Participants
Supply Costs
Facility Costs (Lights)
Facility Costs (Gym at $12 per hour)
Total Direct Costs
Part Time Staff Costs
Total Costs
Total Revenue
Net (Cost)/Revenue
1999 1998 1997
67 39 Not offered
$436
$13
$350
$799
$69
$868
$1,995
$1,127
$355
$12
$367
$734
$86
$820
$1,102
$282
Direct Cost Per Participant
$12
$19
Total Cost Per Participant
$13
$21
Total Revenue Per Participant
$29
$28
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
17
$7
Coordinator Hours
15
14
Program Review: The women's sports program continues to grow. Two sports were offered for the fall 1999 season
that included basketball and cardio -kick. Shirts were not provided for the cardio -kick class and as a result, net
revenues are higher than past seasons. With growing popularity, staff plans to expand the program to include other
sports like golf and tennis.
FALL YOUTH LEAGUES
Junior Basketball League
1999
1998 1997
Participants
49
67 64
Teams
6
8 8
Supply Costs
$1,222
$1,520
Facility Costs (Lights)
$56
$78
Facility Costs (Gym at $12 per hour)
$750
$1,200
Total Direct Costs
$2,028
$2,798
Part Time Staff Costs
$164
$173
Total Costs
$2,192
$2,971
Total Revenue
$2,303
$3,149
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 5
Net (Cost)/Revenue
Sill
$178
Direct Cost Per Participant
$41
$42
Total Cost Per Participant
$45
$44
Total Revenue Per Participant
$47
$47
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$2
$3
Coordinator Hours
15
15
Program Review: Youth League registrations saw a slight decrease in registrations over the past season. The
general trend of the youth sports program has been to increase and then slightly decrease but to remain fairly steady
over the entire year. All costs were covered in this program accept full time staff time.
JBL Upper Division
1999
1998 1997
Participants
80
57 40
Teams
10
6 4
Supply Costs
$1,994
$1,293
Facility Costs (Lights)
$113
$67
Facility Costs (Gym at $12 per hour)
$1,200
$720
Total Direct Costs
$3,307
$2,080
Part Time Staff Costs
$430
$200
Total Costs
$3,737
$2,280
Total Revenue
$4,160
$2,964
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$423
$684
Direct Cost Per Participant
$41
$43
Total Cost Per Participant
$47
$46
Total Revenue Per Participant
$52
$52
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$5
$6
Coordinator Hours
25
20
Program Review: Upper Division JBL continues to grow in popularity and covers all costs associated with the
program. As the Junior Basketball League generates interest, staff anticipates a general rise in registrations
continued success of the program.
JBL Teen Division 1999
1998 1997
Participant's Canceled
22 Not Offered
Teams
3
Supply Costs
$449
Facility Costs (Lights)
$10
Facility Costs (Gym at $12 per hour)
$480
Total Direct Costs
$939
Part Time Staff Costs
$164
Total Costs
$1,103
Total Revenue
$1,144
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$40.05
Direct Cost Per Participant
$42.70
Total Cost Per Participant
$50.16
Total Revenue Per Participant
$52.00
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$1.82
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 6
Coordinator Hours 10
Program Review: As with many teens programs, the JBL teen division struggles this past season and did not receive
enough registrations to hold a league. Staff plans to offer the division again in the spring and will attempt to
directly mail information to the teen in the registration database.
T -Ball League 1999 1998 1997
Participants Not offered Cancelled 16
Teams 2
Coordinator Hours 5
Program Review: T -Ball cancels frequently. Staff has determined that t -ball is extremely seasonal in nature and in
the future, it will only be offered in the Spring and Summer.
WINTER YOUTH SPORTS CAMPS
Winter Sports Camp
1999
1998 1997
Students
15
7 Not Offered
Camps Offered
2
1
Instructor payments
$855
$209
Supplies
$0
$0
Total Direct Costs
$855
$209
Total Revenue
$1615
$900
Refunds and Credits
$190
$410
Net (Cost)/Revenue
$570
$281
Direct Cost Per Participant
$57
$30
Total Revenue Per Participant
$107
$70
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Participant
$34
$40
Coordinator Hours
2
5
Program Review: The only sports camp offered during the winter break session was tennis, instructed by Total
Tennis Academy. The first session ran with 15 students, the second session was canceled.
TEEN PROGRAMS
Teen Classes 1999 1998 1997
Baby sitting basics (two classes) 23 27 Not offered
Program Review: This Babysitting Class, taught by the American Red Cross, continues to be a popular class. The
class is now offered on a monthly basis. While teen - specific classes continue to struggle, it should be noted that
many adult classes include teenagers.
Teen Events 1999 1998 1997
Band Jams
September 75 30 Not offered
(part of skate party
see below)
October Not offered Canceled
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 7
November
100
Canceled
1997
December
Not offered
Canceled
$1860
Teen Open Gym
Not offered
5 (average)
Not offered
Skatepark
260
64 registered
Not offered
Music Fest
Not offered
Not Funded
500
70's Dance Party
Not offered
Not Funded
15
Teen Roller Hockey League
Not offered
Canceled
Canceled
Halloween Pizza party
Not offered
Not Funded
8
Holiday Bash
Not offered
Not Funded
Canceled
Freaky Film Festival
20
Not offered
Not offered
Skate Contests
September
25
Not offered
Not offered
October
20
Not offered
Not offered
November
20
Not offered
Not offered
Back to School Skate Party
75
Not offered
Not offered
Program Review: Teen programs have seen some success over the past quarter. Many of the events offered in the
past were not offered this time as staff concentrated their efforts toward the skatepark, band jams and the Freaky
Film Festival. The teens registered in the skatepark greatly increased due to the elimination of the skatepark fee and
the growing popularity of the skate contest. Approximately 15 -30 teen visit the skatepark on Tuesdays and
Wednesdays and few problems have been reported. A highlight of the season was the Back to School Skatepark
held in September as 75 teens attended and had the opportunity to compete in a skate contest, listen to a DJ and live
band, and purchase refreshments.
Band Jams also grew in popularity this fall. Staff worked closely with Moorpark bands to develop the contacts
necessary to book well -liked bands. Staff plans to continue the effort over the next year.
Coordinator Hours
Superintendent Hours
75 62
35
BROCHURE
The following information does not include the City Clerk's portion of the brochure costs for the City Newsletter.
Brochure Costs
1999
1998
1997
Printing Cost
$3202
$2514
$1860
Mailing Cost
$1091
$1066
$1499
Total Cost
$4293
$3581
$3360
Total Ads
14
10
14
Ad Revenue
$1405
$855
$1185
Net (Cost)/Revenue
($2888)
($2726)
(52175)
FACILITY RENTALS
The division processes rentals for Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and all neighborhood parks. The costs shown for
AVRC rentals include rental coverage by part time staff. Figures from 1997 were not available. Please note that
many permits include multiple dates. For example, AYSO has been issued one permit for the full season, which
includes multiple dates. Please also note that staff and direct cost figures are not available for park rentals.
Park Rentals
1999 1998 1997
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report: Recreation Division
Page 8
Total Permits
Total Revenue
Average Revenue Per Rental
Coordinator Hours
Superintendent Hours
AVRC Rentals
Total Permits
Part Time Staff Hours
Part Time Staff Costs
Total Costs
Total Revenue
Net (Cost)/Revenue
Staff Cost Per Rental
Average Revenue Per Rental
Net (Cost)/Revenue Per Rental
Coordinator Hours
Superintendent Hours
200
181
$6,950
$4,795
$35
$26
75
80
15
1999
15
98.5
$855
$855
$9,125
$8,270
$57
$608
$551
35
1998
36
100.75
$856
$856
$3,619
$2,763
$24
$101
$77
40
7
Not available
1997
Not available
Please note: total revenues for 1999 include an increase in use of the gym at AVRC.
Fall 1999 Quarterly Report. Recreation Division
Page 9
AGENDA REPORT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Allen Walter, Supervisor of Maintenance and
Operations
DATE: January 18, 2000 (for February 7, 2000 meeting)
SUBJECT: Parks Quarterly Report
October through December, 1999
• AVCP Tennis Courts: The tennis court landscape planting has
been completed. The planters were planted with Jasmine
shrubs and Malalocea and Carrotwood trees. Rabbits
destroyed the Jasmine, so the plants were removed and
replanted in other areas of the City by Sunridge. They were
replaced with Acacias (same species as in the gym
planters). The tennis court timer buzzers were also
readjusted in length and sound level after receiving some
complaints. Eight tennis court benches and four trash cans
were installed by Park Division staff. Sunridge adjusted
several sprinkler heads to address the overspray on the
courts. The irrigation will continue to be monitored to
make sure the problem has been corrected. The rules and
regulations signs were posted. The net straps were stolen.
Park staff ordered new ones and they were replaced. The
City has contracted with Dial Security for locking the
tennis courts on weekends.
• AVCP: A backstop on a softball field was vandalized. Park
Division staff had to replace four wooden planks along the
bottom portion.
The well building # 2 (east end) was vandalized. Unknown
persons broke the wooden door to the meter; Park Division
staff made the necessary repairs.
The well transformer had to be repaired three times due to
Packer Football activities. It is now back to full
MAPLemcke\M\Commission\AGENDA REPORT.doc
Parks Quarterly Report
Page 2
operation and Packer Football no longer has access to power
from the transformer.
Bookman and Edmonston Engineering tested the well water at
AVCP as a part of a water characterization study for
Calleguas Creek. The report was received and the water
appears to have a higher Boron content than previously
recorded (from .9 to 2.69 mg /l.) The increase in Boron may
be a by- product of low rainfall.
• Campus Canyon Park: The City contracted with Pederson Fence
Company to replace the wrought iron fencing along the
backside of the park. The project is currently in progress.
Pedersen has received the fence posts and has marked the
block wall for installation. They will remove the remainder
of the old fence, and completion of installation is
scheduled for January 20. Park staff has repaired the
damaged block wall and Sunridge performed the weed
abatement behind the wall.
A little over 2 yards of infield dirt was delivered and
graded. The field is now up to playing standards.
The Commission approved the design of new playground
equipment. Installation cost proposals will be sought from
qualified contractors.
• Poindexter Park: The valve to the water toy had to be
replaced and the equipment is back in operation. A gate
valve was added to the system so the water to the toy will
shut off automatically if the valve should stick or break
again.
Park staff installed a turbine fan on the men's restroom
roof. This will hopefully remove or reduce odors during
warm weather conditions.
The drinking fountain at the ballfield's backstop was
repaired. This took longer than anticipated, due to the
back order of the part needed.
WPLemckeWCommission\AGENDA REPORT.doc
Parks Quarterly Report
Page 3
• Glenwood Park: The unused swing poles were removed from the
playground. The poles were in violation of playground
standards and were not operational.
The park's rules sign was moved from the corner of Tierra
Rejada and Courtney to the park's entrance by the drinking
fountain. The new location provides greater visibility for
the sign.
• Tierra Rejada Park: Two basketball rims need to be replaced
and are on order.
A spring toy broke and had to be removed. The replacement
part is on order, and once it is delivered, the toy will be
repaired and installed.
A 50 -foot tennis court windscreen panel had to be replaced,
due to continual vandalism.
• Peach Hill Park: The drinking fountain at the ballfield
cannot be repaired and needs to be replaced. All securing
devices inside the fountain have become rusted and will no
longer support the water bowl in place. The cost will be
approximately $1,200.
New playground equipment was chosen by the Parks &
Recreation Commission. Staff will solicit removal and
installation cost proposals from the contractor.
• Campus Park: The restroom's sewer pipes, from the restroom
to the street, had to be replaced due to age. A more
durable pipe was used for replacement and it was completed
in October. The repair cost $5,600.
• Villa Campesina Park: Two picnic tables were purchased and
installed. The funds used came from Assessment District
91 -2, Zone 12. Additionally, three security lights in the
parking lot were repaired.
MAPLemckeWCommission\AGENDA REPORT.doc
Parks Quarterly Report
Page 4
Unknown person destroyed twenty sprinklers. It appeared
someone used a bat or golf club to hit sprinkler bodies,
destroying them beyond repair.
• Mountain Meadows Park: A spring toy broke and was replaced.
It was still under warranty.
• All Parks: Irrigation timers in all park and streetscapes
were adjusted to the time change on 11/1/99. Additionally,
due to the dry weather and lack of rain, water expenditures
are higher than estimated in the FY 99/00 budget.
Security lighting was repaired at AVCP, Griffin Park, Peach
Hill Park, Tierra Rejada Park, and Mountain Meadows Park.
MAPLemcke\M\Commission\AGENDA REPORT.doc
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA REPORT
The Parks and Recreation Commission
Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent
January 24, 2000 (Parks & Recreation Meeting of
February 7, 2000)
Consider Adjustment in Fee Schedule for Tennis Court
Rentals
In response to a request from the Moorpark Tennis Club (MTC),
staff presented the Parks and Recreation Commission with a
recommendation to adjust the rental fees for City tennis courts
at the January 2,2000 meeting. At that meeting, the Commission
requested that staff research municipal tennis court rental fees
and provide a recommendation for non - profit tournament rental
fee and policy. The current fee schedule does not include a
tournament fee for use of multiple tennis courts for an extended
period of time.
The Parks and Recreation Commission is being asked to approve a
recommendation to City Council to adjust Resolution Number 98-
1523, Park Reservation Fees (Attachment A). This action would
amend the Park Reservation Fee Schedule by reducing the rental
fee for all City tennis courts, including a rental fee for
resident non - profit groups to conduct tennis tournaments,
establishing a policy to maintain a minimum number of tennis
courts available for public play and limit the number of times
per year a non - profit group can hold a tournament using City
facilities.
l9 c�K6 - 4 120
DISCUSSION
The City of Moorpark has an established rental fee policy for
tennis courts. The current hourly fee for City of Moorpark
residents and non - profit groups is $10 per hour.
Staff reviewed the schedule of fees for the rental of the public
tennis courts and in other jurisdictions and found that they
varied from $3 to $10 per hour for residents and local non-
profit groups ($5 to $10 for jurisdictions surrounding
Moorpark). Staff recommends an adjustment to Resolution No. 98-
1523. The recommended adjustment is as follows:
Fee schedule revision: Staff proposes that the fee schedule
for tennis court rentals be adjusted downwards. The
recommended fee changes are consistent with the rental fees
charged in surrounding communities for similar park
amenities.
Additionally, staff proposes to establish a Moorpark
resident non - profit group tournament rental fee. This is
defined as organizations who are tax exempt under Section
501 (C) (3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code and
chartered within the City's limits. The tournament rental
fee would consist of a flat rate that includes use of a
maximum of five (5) tennis courts at Arroyo Vista for a
period of five (5) hours. Any additional rental time
and /or courts would be subject to the established hourly
fee schedule for tennis courts. Any court lights needed
would be subject to the additional coin operated fee.
In addition, staff proposes that the Parks and Recreation
Commission also recommend that this policy ensure City
residents are not excluded from having the opportunity to
participate in drop -in tennis play during rental periods.
Presently, there are eight (8) tennis courts at Arroyo
Vista Park and three (3) at Tierra Rejada Park. Staff
proposes to limit any inconvenience to the public by
restricting the number of courts available for rent. A
maximum of six (6) tennis courts at Arroyo Vista Park and
two (2) at Tierra Rejada Park will be available for rent.
This would keep at least three (3) city tennis courts
VA
assessable to the public at all times, unless special
permission by the city of Moorpark City Council is granted.
Attachment B compares the proposed fees with the current
fees, and with fees charged by other agencies.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission
propose a recommendation to:
1. Adjust the tennis court rental fee schedule, including a
tournament rate as identified on Attachment B;
2. Establish a tournament policy as outline in the Agenda Report;
and
3. Establish a tennis court rental limit policy of no more than
six (6) courts at Arroyo Vista Community Park and no more than
two (2) courts at Tierra Rejada Park.
M: \GIndermiI1 \M \Commission Reports \tennis court tournament fees2.doc
3
L
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -1523
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 86 -351 (RULES AND
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE USE OF FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC
PARKLAND) AND RESOLUTION 93 -950 ADOPTING A PARK
RESERVATION FEE SCHEDULE; AND ADOPTING REVISED RULES AND
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE USE OF THE FACILITIES IN PUBLIC
PARKLAND, GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS AND FEE SCHEDULE.
WHEREAS, a Parks and Recreation Commission Ad Hoc Committee has recommended
revisions to the Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of the Facilities in Public Parkland,
group classifications and fees; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 21, 1998 the City Council considered and
concurred with the Parks and Recreation Ad Hoc Committee recommendations; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 86 -351 (Rules and Regulations Governing the
Use of Facilities in the Public Parkland) and Resolution No. 93 -950 (Adopting a Park
Reservation Fee Schedule) shall be rescinded and replaced with the Resolution herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. City Council Resolution No. 86 -351 (Rules and Regulations Governing
the Use of Facilities in the Public Parkland) and Resolution No. 93 -950 (Adopting a Park
Reservation Fee Schedule) are hereby rescinded and replaced with the Resolution herein.
SECTION 2: The general provisions of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of
the Facilities in Public Parkland shall read as follows:
2.1 Purpose
The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the within Rules and Regulations
Governing the Use of the Facilities in Public Parkland shall be to provide directory
guidelines for staff and the public relating to the use and rental of City park facilities. In
the event of any non - compliance with, or violation of, any provision herein, such shall
not be deemed to affect the validity of any action taken, unless otherwise specifically
provided by law.
2.2 Enforcement
The City Manager or his/her designee is hereby authorized to implement and administer
the policies and regulations contained herein.
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 2
2.3 Hours
All parks and park facilities operated by the City are available for public use from 6:00
am to 10:00 pm. Softball, basketball or other field lights are not available after 10:00 pm.
The parks are closed from 10:00 pm to 6:00 am. Parks and park restrooms shall be closed
in the event of inclement weather.
2.4 Rental Applications
Park facilities are available for the reservation and use of individuals or groups subject to
the issuance of a permit and payment of fees. All applications must be signed by an adult
of 21 years or older who shall agree to be responsible for said use. Permits are
immediately revocable if false statements are made in reserving a facility or if an
individual or groups willfully violates any rule or regulation established by. the City. Fees
shall be retained in the event the activity is terminated due to the violation of any rule or
regulation, or the falsification of the application. Applications may be made up to 90 days
prior to the event. Groups of over seventy -five people are required to obtain a permit and
make a deposit to cover damage caused by the rental.
2.5 Deposits
A refundable deposit may be required for an activity to be held in a public park facility.
The deposit may be retained for clean up of facilities, any damage to the premises and
any additional staffing not included in the fees paid. Should charges exceed the amount
of deposit, the permittee shall be billed for the difference and allowed thirty (30) days in
which to make payment.
2.6 Additional Charges
Additional charges may be levied beyond the basic rental rate if staff is needed to set up
or clean up, or if the facility is damaged. Additionally, permittee must provide liability
insurance for certain types of attractions such as pony rides or moonbounces.
2.7 Refunds and Credits
Park permit fees are non - refundable except for cancellations due to inclement weather.
Such conditions include rain, fog, wind, or temperatures below 55 ° Fahrenheit or above
95' Fahrenheit. In the event of illness, unexpected absence or accidental overbooking,
permittees are eligible for a credit for a future rental up to the amount paid. It is the
responsibility of the permittee to contact the City of Moorpark to cancel the reservation
and request a credit before the rental date. Failure to do so will negate any consideration
for a credit or rescheduling.
.
Y
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 3
2.8 Requesting a Reduction or a Waiver Of Fees
A non - profit organization may request a reduction or a waiver of fees for the use of City
park facilities by forwarding the request in a letter form to:
Director of Community Services
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
All requests should include the organization's non - profit number as well as the name of
the organization, purpose of the gathering, expected attendance, requested facility, time
and date. All requests will be considered on a case by case and a first- come /first -served
basis and depend upon facility availability.
Teachers or classes within Moorpark Unified School District may request the use of park
facility for a year -end party provided the responsible party guarantees a supervision ratio
of no less than 1:20, and ensures that the facility is cleaned after use. The fee for such a
use is $5 per hour for each 40 persons attending.
Waivers or reductions in fees cannot exclude clean up or repair costs. A deposit may be
required. All other park rules and ordinances apply. The City reserves the right to deny
any such request.
2.9 Right of Appeal
A permittee has the right to appeal the decision by City staff to revoke a permit, levy
additional charges and/or deduct a portion of a deposit. An appeal must be filed in
writing to the City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue within five (5) days of receiving
your notification. The City Manager or his/her designee will affirm or deny the appeal in
five (5) days. Any further appeal must be made in writing to the City Council within ten
(10) days upon notification of the decision on the appeal. Such appeal shall be considered
at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council.
2.10 Liabili
In order to rent a City facility, the permittee must agree in writing to hold the City
harmless and indemnify the City from liability for injury to persons or property occurring
as a result of the rental. The permittee also agrees to be liable to the City for damage to
the park, equipment, buildings or facilities caused by any person at the activity.
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 4
2.11 Special Use of City Equipment
Groups or individuals requesting the use of City equipment not listed on the rental fee
Schedule should forward the request in a letter to:
Director of Community Services
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
All requests will be considered on a case by case basis. The City reserves the right to
deny any such request.
2.12 Use of Special Attractions
Activities that create loud or distracting noises are not permitted. Activities that include
amplified sound require a special permit.
Moonbounces and other such inflatable attractions are only allowed at Arroyo Vista
Community Park, Peach Hill Park, Griffin Park and Poindexter Park. Such"devices are
restricted to the parking lot and may not be placed on the turf. Violators may be fined
for damage to landscaping, sprinklers and/or turf as applicable. The City requires that
Certificate of Insurance be filed in advance.
Pony rides are only allowed at Arroyo Vista Community Park, and are restricted to the
parking lot. Ponies are not allowed on the turf Violators may be fined for damage to
landscaping, sprinklers and/or turf. Pony rides may be restricted during certain seasons.
The City requires that a Certificate of Insurance and a deposit of $100 be filed in
advance. Persons planning to have such an attraction at their event MUST notify the City
of Moorpark before the event.
2.13 Complaints
Your complaints and comments are welcome. Please forward your concerns in writing to:
City of Moorpark
Community Services Department
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 5
SECTION 3. The Park Rental Group Classification shall read as follows:
3.1 Purpose
The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the Park Rental Group
Classifications shall be to provide directory guidelines for staff and the public relating to
the classification of groups and individuals renting City park facilities.
3.2 Group Classification Definition
GROUP 1 City sponsored programs or co- sponsored programs.
GROUP 2 Residents of the City of Moorpark and organizations that are tax
exempt under Section 5010 (3) of the U.S. Revenue Code
chartered within the City limits of the City of Moorpark, and other
qualifying non - profit organizations. This includes such uses as
recreation/youth serving organizations, Homeowners Association
meetings and political fund- raisers for the City of Moorpark
elections or other political offices where the candidate is a City
resident. Other governmental agencies (the County, School
District, for example), and their commissions, boards or
departments.
GROUP 3 Residents of the Moorpark Unified School District boundaries that
reside outside of the City limits; non - profit service organizations
not covered under Group 2; and City of Moorpark business and
commercial for profit organizations for activities where no
admission fee is charged and no product is sold (i.e.: for
recreational purposes).
GROUP 4 City of Moorpark businesses and for profit organizations (for
business purposes), and non City residents, organizations and
businesses (for recreational purposes).
GROUP 5 Non City residents, organizations and businesses for business
purposes.
SECTION 4. The Park Rental/Use Fee Schedule shall read as follows:
4.1 Purpose
The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the Park RentaUUse Fee Schedule
shall be to provide directory guidelines for staff and the public relating to the fees and
deposits required to rent City park facilities and amenities. The City shall reserve the
right to make adjustments or impose additional fees on a case -by -case basis.
1
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 6
4.2 Park Facility Permit Fees
A. Softball]
Group l:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Group 5:
diamond:
No Charge
$10 per hour
$15 per hour
$20 per hour
$30 per hour
B. Diamond Preparation:
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$25
Group 3:
$35
Group 4:
$35
Group 5:
$35
C. Softball Base Rental
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$7*
Group 3:
$10*
Group 4:
$10*
Group 5:
$20*
*$100 deposit
required
D. Softball Lights
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$20 per hour
Group 3:
$25 per hour
Group 4:
$30 per hour
Group 5:
$40 per hour
E. Horseshoe Pit
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$5 per hour
Group 3:
$10 per hour
Group 4:
$15 per hour
Group 5:
$25 per hour
F. Horseshoes
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$7*
Group 3:
$10*
Group 4:
$10*
Group 5:
$20*
*$50 deposit
required
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 7
G. Soccer Field
Group 1:
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
S8 per hour
Group 3:
$12 per hour
Group 4:
$15 per hour
Group 5:
$25 per hour
H. Outdoor
Group 1:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Group 5:
Basketball Court
No Charge
$8 per hour
$12 per hour
$15 per hour
$25 per hour
I. Outdoor Basketball Court (Night Use With Lights)
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$18 per hour
Group 3:
$22 per hour
Group 4:
$25 per hour
Group 5:
$35 per hour
J. Tennis Court
Group 1:
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$10 per hour
Group 3:
$15 per hour
Group 4:
$20 per hour
Group 5:
$30 per hour
K. Tennis C
Group 1:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Group 5:
ourt (Night Use With Lights)
No Charge
$20 per hour
$25 per hour
$30 per hour
$40 per hour
L. Multipurpose Court
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$10 per hour
Group 3:
$15 per hour
Group 4:
$25 per hour
Group 5:
$35 per hour
M. Roller Hockey Goals
Group 1: No Charge
Group 2: $7
Group 3: $10
s
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 8
Group 4: $10
Group 5: $20
N. Roller Hockey Border Patrol
Group 1: No Charge
Group 2: $45 per hour*
Group 3: $60 per hour*
Group 4: $75 per hour*
Group 5: $85 per hour*
*$36 set up fee and $100 deposit required
Additional $18 per hour if rental is not during normal Recreation Center
operating hours.
O. Picnic Pa
Group 1:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Group 5:
Milion
No Charge
$10 per hour
$15 per hour
$20 per hour
$30 per hour
P. Gazebo
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$6 per hour
Group 3:
$10 per hour
Group 4:
$15 per hour
Group 5:
$25 per hour
Q. Picnic Area
Group 1:
No Charge
Gro. 0 2:
$5 per hour
Grai_,) 3:
$10 per hour
Group 4:
$15 per hour
Group 5:
$25 per hour
R. Open Area
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$5 per hour
Group 3:
$ 10 per hour
Group 4:
$15 per hour
Group 5:
$25 per hour
S. Snack Bar
Group 1:
No Charge
Group 2:
$10 per hour*
Group 3:
$15 per hour*
Group 4:
$20 per hour*
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 9
Group 5: $30 per hour*
*$100 deposit fee required.
Additional $18 per hour if rental is not during normal Recreation Center
operating hours.
T. Electricity
Group 1:
Group 2:
Group 3:
Group 4:
Group 5:
No Charge
$2 per hour
$4 per hour
$6 per hour
$16 per hour
4.3 Security Deposit Requirements
A. Softball Base Rental: $100 deposit
B. Horseshoes: $50 deposit
C. Roller Hockey Border System: $100 deposit
D. Large Group Deposit
75 -100 people: $100 deposit
100 -150 people: $150 deposit
150 -200 People: $200 deposit
200 -500 people: $250 deposit
Groups of over 500: $350 deposit
E. Snack Bar: $100 deposit
4.4 Additional Fees
A. A staff fee of $18 per hour may be levied if the rental is not during
normal Recreation Center operating hours and requires staff assistance or
coverage.
B. A surcharge for large groups may be levied in addition to the regular use
fee. These fees are as follows:
75 -100 people: No surcharge
100 -150 people: Add $10 per hour
154 -200 People: Add $20 per hour
204 -500 people: Add $30 per hour
Groups of over 500: Add $50 per hour
Resolution No. 98 -1523
Page 10
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 21 st 4A-\y OF OCTO 1998.
yor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedr, City Clerk
. . ,
ATTACHMENT B AGENCY FEE SCHEDULES FOR CITY TENNIS COURT RENTAL
AGOURA HILLS DOES NOT HAVE
ATASCADERO DOES NOT RENT
BURBANK (WKDAY)
BURBANK (WKEND)
CALABASAS
DOES NOT RENT
$5.00
$7.00
$5.00
$7.00
$5.00
$7.00
$5.00
$7.00
CAMINO REAL
CATHEDRAL CITY
COMMERCE
N/C
DOES NOT RENT
DOES NOT RENT
$5.00
$5.00
$5.00
$5.00
CONCORD
DOES NOT RENT
CONEJO
CORDOVA
N/C
DOES NOT RENT
$7.00
$11.00
$7.00
$11.00
GLENDALE
GRIFFITH PARK -LA
IRVINE
LA COUNTY
DOES NOT RENT
N/C
DOES NOT RENT
$4.50
$6.00
$5.00
$4.50
$6.00
$8.00
$4.50
$6.00
$20.00
$4.50
$6.00
$20.00
LONG BEACH
DOES NOT RENT
MONTEREY COUNTY
MOORPARK
MORRO BAY
NOVATO
ORANGE
PALM SPRINGS
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
DOES NOT RENT
$5.00
$10.00
$3.59
$4.00
$4.00
$5.00
$15.00
$4.10
$4.50
$4.00
$5.00
$20.00
$5.13
$7.50
$4.00
$5.00
$30.00
$5.13
&7.50
$4.00
PASADENA
PASO ROBLES
DOES NOT RENT
$16.00
$16.00
$16.00
$16.00
PLEASANT VALLEY
ROLLING HILLS
SAN RAMON
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
DOES NOT RENT
N/C
N/C
DOES NOT RENT
$5.50
$7.00
+$30 FLAT RATE
$5.50
$7.00
+$30 FLAT RATE
$5.50
$7.00
+$30 FLAT RATE
$5.50
$7.00
$50 FLAT RAT
$6.00
+$30 FLAT RATE
SANTA CLARITA I DOES NOT RENT
Tennis court rental fees
ATTACHMENT B AGENCY FEE SCHEDULES FOR CITY TENNIS COURT RENTAL
SIMI VALLEY N/C $10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
SLO COUNTY
N/C
$5.00
$5.00
$5.00
$5.00
VENTURA
N/C
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
WESTMINSTER
DOES NOT RENT
AVERAGE COST]
$6.37
$7.14
$8.151
$9.07
MOORPARK PROPOSED
N/C
$6.00
$9.00
$12.00
$15.00
$100.00
Group Classification Definitions
City sponsored and co- sponsored. Programs sponsored or co- sponsored by the city agency.
City resident, non - profit. Residents of the agency and organizations or are tax exempt under Section 501 (C) (3)
of the United States Internal Revenue Code, chartered within the agency city limits.
Non - resident, non - profit. Residents who live outside agency city limits.
Non -profit organizations that are not covered by Section 501 (C) (3).
City business for profit and non -city non - profit. Businesses residing within agency city limits,
non -city resident and non - profit organizations.
Non -city business. Businesses not residing within agency city limits.
Tennis court rental fees
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks & Recreation Conmission
FROM: Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent &V?
DATE: January 24, 2000 (Meeting of February 7, 2000)
SUBJECT: Proposition 12 Summary
BACKGROUND
The Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean water, Clean Air, and Coastal
Protection Bond Act, called Proposition 12 will be on the March 7
California State ballot. If approved by voters it will provide
funding to local governments, based on population,to develop,
improve, and maintain parks. Additionally, the proposed Act
provides competitive grant funding opportunities for park
improvements, trails, and historic preservation. Authors of
Proposition 12 state that its purpose is to improve the quality
of life, by providing cleaner air and water, recreational
opportunities, safe places for children to play, and new wildlife
preserves in California. Proposition 12 will provide funding for
safe neighborhood parks and for programs to give youth safe
recreational alternatives to gangs and drugs.
BENEFITS
There are several direct allocation, non - competitive grants that
benefit urban areas, neighborhood parks, and at -risk youth
available to cities, counties and special districts. These per
capita grant allocations will be based on 2000 census population
data. The census results will be determined by spring 2001.
The Per Capita Program provides $388 million in direct allocation
grant to cities, counties and special districts. These non-
competitive per capita grants are for the acquisition,
development, improvement, rehabilitation, restoration
enhancement, and interpretation of Local Park and recreational
lands and facilities. Included in this is the renovation of
recreational facilities conveyed to local agencies resulting from
prop 12 summary3
the downsizing or decommissioning of federal and military
installations.
Per capita I program $338 million
Provides funds to local jurisdictions for the acquisition,
development, rehabilitation or restoration of real property
for park purposes - -60% of the funds are allocated to cities
and districts, with a minimum allocation of $30,000. The
remaining 40% are allocated to counties and regional
districts. The minimum to regional districts and counties
will be $150,000.
Cities /districts: $6.29 per capita
Counties: $4.00 per capita
Per capita II program $50 million
Provides additional funds to small cities with populations
less than 200,000 and in counties with populations of more
than 200,000.
Cities /districts: $2.70 per capita
Roberti- Z'berg- Harris program $200 million
The Roberti- Z'berg- Harris (R -Z -H) Urban Open -Space and
Recreational Program provides $200 million in grants to
cities, counties and special districts. A majority of the
funds are provided as block grants (per capita) to
jurisdictions that are urbanized or heavily urbanized. The
remainder of the funds is awarded on a competitive basis,
with the majority of the competitive funds going to non -
urbanized jurisdictions.
R -Z -H funds are designed to be used:
(1) Rehabilitation or refurbishing performed annually or
infrequently, excludes capital improvements and other
routine maintenance work, special major maintenance projects
include energy efficiency for lands and facilities (i.e.,
irrigation systems, replacement or repair of indoor facility
or resurfacing parking lots; and (2) Innovative recreation
programs that respond to unique and otherwise unmet
recreation needs of special urban populations; can fund
transportation to facilitate access to programs and
facilities.
R -Z -H requires a match of 30% of project costs. Funds will
be distributed on following formula:
69% block grants for urbanized areas
60% cities and districts $3.33 per capita
14% block grants to heavily urbanized areas
60% large cities $1.86 per capita
17% competitive grants $33,490,000
prop 12 summary3
88% non - urbanized jurisdictions
12% urbanized, not including heavily urbanized
Other funding programs local agencies may
Riparian /river /aquatics habitat
Trails, nonmotorized
Low income /at risk youth
Urban /cultural centers /zoos/
Wildlife education
Regional youth soccer facilities
Playground replacement
CA Heritage Fund
Urban forestation projects
Local Conservation Corp.
State parks administered by local agencies
Funds Available to the City of Moorpark
compete for:
$10 million
$10 million
$100 million
$71.5 million
$15 million
$7 million
$10 million
$10 million
$12.5 million
$20 million
Listed below is the Prop 12 estimates of per - capita direct
allocation grants for the City of Moorpark, based on a population
of 29,600:
Roberti- Z'berg- Harris Urban Open -Space
and Recreation Program $ 97,680
Per Capita Program I $185,000
Per - Capita II, Small Cities $ 79,920
TOTAL $362,600
Attached to this Agenda Report is some additional Proposition 12
reference materials. The CPRS Fact Sheet, Bond funding available
under Prop 12, and Estimates of Per - Capital Grants Available.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file.
D:\home-folders\Glndermill\M\Commission Reports \prop 12 summary3.doc
prop 12 summary3
CALIFORNIA PARK &
RECREATION SOCIETY
7971 Freeport Blvd
Sacramento, CA
95832 -9701
916/665 -2777
FAX 916/665 -9149
www.cprs.org
Contact:
Jane H. Adams,
Executive Director
9161665 -2777
jane@cprs.org
ORS provides
the leadership
to advance the
positive impact
and value of
the profession
on society
FACT SHEET
Prop 12: The March 2000 park bond'
Gov. Gray Davis signed Proposition 12 (bill AB 18) on September 21 in Los Angeles. Citizens
will vote AB 18, the "Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal
Protection Bond," on the March 2000 ballot. It requires a simple majority to pass (i.e., 50%
+ 1). This $2.1 billion bond act, the largest park bond in U.S. history, includes the following:
Per capita I program $338 million'
Provides funds to local jurisdictions for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation or
restoration of real property for park purposes -60% of the funds are allocated to cities
and districts; with a minimum allocation of $30,000.40% is allocated to counties and
regional districts. The minimum to regional districts and counties will be $150,000.
cities /districts: $6.29 per capita counties: $4.00 per capita
Per capita If program $50 million
citiesldistricts: $2.70 per capita'
Roberti- Z'berg- Harris program $200 million
R -Z -H funds (1) rehabilitation or refurbishing performed annually or infrequently; excludes
capital improvements and other routine maintenance work; special major maintenance
projects include energy efficiency for lands and facilities (i.e., irrigation systems, replace-
ment or repair of indoor facility or resurfacing parking lots. (2) innovative recreation
programs that respond to unique and otherwise unmet recreation needs of special urban
populations; can fund transportation to facilitate access to programs and facilities. R -Z -H
requires a match of 30% of project costs. Funds are distributed on following formula:
69% block grants for urbanized areas
60% cities and districts $3.33` per capita
40% counties and regional districts $1.75 per capita
140/6 block grants to heavily urbanized areas
60% large cities $1.86 per capita
40% large counties and regional districts $ .49 per capita
17% competitive gram $33,490,000
88% non- urbanized jurisdictions
12% urbanized, not including heavily urbanized
Other funding programs local agencies may compete for funds:
Ripariantriver /aquatics habitat $10 million Trails, nonmotorized $10 million
Low income/at risk youth $100 million Urban/cultural centers/ $71.5 million
Regional youth soccer facilities $15 million zoostwildlife education
Playground replacement $7 million CA Heritage Fund $10 million
Urban forestation proj. $10 million Local Conservation Corps $12.5 million
State parks administered by local agencies $20 million
The full text of Prop 12 is available on the CPRS website legislative page
(www.cprs.orgileglslative). Search for the text of AB 18. 9199
' Proposition number tentative, to be confirmed by November 11, 1999
'State Department of Parks & Recreation will administer; less than 1.5% of total allocation is for grant
administration.
' Provides funds to cities and districts with populations of 200,000 or less within urbanized counties with a
population greater than 200,000
'The allocations given here are estimates developed by the Department of Parks & Recreation
Explanation of Park Bond I em Provisions
PROPOSITION 12
KEY TO SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSITION
vtp.,, .
All Sections of Proposition 12 begin with 5096. The subsection numbers are shows
below. Thus, 301 means 5096.301. All dollars are in $ million.
Article 1. General Provisions
300 -303. Intent language.
3ub. All agencies shall use recycled and reusable products in carrying out the act.
3075. If a aroiect cannot be carried out. Legislature may reallocate funds.
308. Definitions
Article 2. Bond Act Program
310. All funds must be appropriated by the Legislature.
a) $3uz Ib to uepartment of Narks and Recreation for State Nark Purposes, including tacllities
and land acquisition, SNOPARK, interpretation, and clean air projects.
b) $18 for stewardship and cultural tac111t1es.
c) $4 for volunteer participation in State Park System.
d) $1u for local agencies tat administer State Park units
e) $10 for competitive grants for historic preservation (.335)
t) $33tf for per capita grants for local park and recreation tactlltles.
g) $200 for Robert - Zberg- Harris Urban Open -Space and Recreation grants
h) $1 U for urban streams grants
i) $10 for trails, including those in Whittier, East Bay, and Concord
I) $1uu for low income areas to benetit youth (sate neighborhood parks)
k) $2.5 million for California Conservation Corps projects
1) $8b. b: $/1.5 for zoos, museums and aquariums; and $15 for youth sports
m) $265.5 for Wildlife Conservation Board
n) $5U for I ahoe t;onservancy
o) $220.4 for Coastal Conservancy
p) $35 for Santa Monica Mountains conservancy
q) $5 for Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy
r) $15 for San Joaquin River conservancy
s) $12.5 for Local Conservation Corps
t) $1b for Agricultural Land Preservation
u) $10 for Urban Forestry
v) $11 for uepartment of Hsh and Game for wUdlite, wetlands, and non - native plant removal
w) $30 for Bav Area Conservancv (Part of Coastal Conservancy). including Mt. Diablo State
Park
x) $7 to lntegrated Waste Management Board for olavaround eauipment made of recvcled
material
v) $15 for Golden Gate Park
1 of 3 113100 9:56 PM
Explanation of Paris Bond Text Provisions
http: / /ww.v. safeparks,org/provisions.hmll
z) $6.25 for Sierra Nevada - Cascade; $33.5 for River Parkways (LA, San Gabriel, Kern, Santa
Clarita,
Sacramento, American, Sonoma County), plus recreation facilities in San Benito County,
watt, and Uil'roy; Lamp Arroyo (Alameda County), and Wddhaven Center in San
Bernardino County.
Article 3. State Park Svstem Program
320. Requires evaluation of needs of state park system
321. Almost no acquisition of improved property until /6% of deterred maintenance is solved.
323. $50 for NCCP related State Park land acquisition.
324. $15 Angel island restoration; $2.6 Chino dills and Citrus historical Park, $.6bO for
playgrounds
to state parks, $.250 Poppy Preserve, $5 archaeological sites In State parks, V. i5 tmpire
Mine and Columbia State Parks. $10 Redwoods. $.5 Coe State Park trail
Article 4. Grant Program
.331 Allocation of local grants: purposes.
.332 Division of tunas among cities, counties, special districts
.333 More division of funds
.334 Allocation of funds within LA County: 2011/o at risk youth tacimies; 4Uw /o economically
disadvantaged areas; 10% urban forestry; 5% cultural park, rest unallocated.
.335 Historic fund allocation.
.336 a) Per capita allocation. b) allocation to cities less than 200,000, in counties more than
200,000
.337 Allocation of urban creeks, trails, Sierra - Cascade funds.
.335 Allocation of sate neignbom000 pant tunas
.339 Allocation of zoo and museum funds. $7 to California Science Center School, $3 to
African
American Museum, $.5 to National Marine Sanctuaries, $10 Santa Ana Science Center, $10
C;aiitomia Academy of Sciences, $2 Delta Science tenter, $15 I urtie Bay, $4.25 Los
Angeles County Fair site, $3.5 Kern County Museum.
.:340. Allocation of museum and zoo money: Legislative role
.341 Application for local grants for various purposes.
.342 Ownership of local projects
.343 Agreement to operate local projects: changes in ownership.
.:344 vltts may be accepted
.345 Budqetinq of park bond funds
Article 4.5 Clean Air Improvement Program
346. Urban forestry grants qiven preferentially where clean air benefits will be provided.
Article 4.6. Sierra Nevada Cascade Mountain Region
.347 $2 Tahoe Commons Beach, $.5 City within 5 miles of Sacramento -San Joaquin County
fine,
$.25 State Historical Point of Interest at Jack Tone Road and State Hiohwav 88. Includes
2 of 3 I /3/00 9:56 PM
Explanrtion of Paris Bond Text Provisions
http://www.safeparks.org/provisions.hmil
limitations on program.
.348 Limitations on at -nsK youth tunas: poor ana urbanizea areas; T u" /o to Jcouts ana similar
groups
.350 vVilaute conservation Board tunas: $5 for genital valley Habitat Joint venture, $5 Tor
wetlands
outsiae Lentral vaney, $10 npanan ana watersnea conservation. $40 enaangerea species, $5
Central Coast preserve, $5 Forest Legacy program -oak woodlands, $82.5 Endangered
species,
$100 NCCP plans, $5 Salton Sea
Article 6 Lake Tahoe Program (.351)
Article 7. Coastal Protection Program
.352 $25 Bay Area Conservancy, $25 Santa Monica Bay Restoration, $3 beach erosion, $13
upper
Newport Bay Ecological Reserve, $15 north of Gualala River, $24 Central Coast, $1 Window
on
the Bay in Monterey, $2 Guadalupe and SF Bay Ridge Trail, $.8 San Mateo Creek fisheries,
$'z5 salmon, $29 mays vista wetianas $12.5 Laguna toast vvnaemess F'arK
353 Santa Monica Mountains expenditures.
354 toacnelia vaney mountains conservancy
Article 9. San Joaquin River Program (.355)
Article 10. Agricultural Conservation (.356) (20% for San Pablo Bay area)
357. DFG Funds.
Article 12. California Indian Tribe Participation (.358)
Article 13. Fiscal Provisions and election provisions
3 of 1/3/009:56 PM
DRAFT Prop 1 Estimates f Per - Capita Grants Programs DRAFT
For planning nty. m The populations for districts are not available.
Agency eligibility and overlapping populations will be determined by spring of 2001.
1/1/1999 Population
Per- Captis 11
Agency Estimates
RZH
Per Capita
Small Cities
Total
Rate - Allocation
Rate -
Allocation
Rate -
Allocation
TUOLUMNE
COUNTY
SONORA
4,250
$0
$6.25
$30,000
$2.70
$11,475
$41,475
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
53,100
$0
$4.00
$212,400
s0
$212,400
TUOLUMNE R.P.D.
$0
$6.25
$0
$0
$0
TWAIN HARTE R.P.D.
$0
$6.25
$0
$0
$0
County Total
$253,875
VENTURA
COUNTY
CAMARILLO
61,500
$3.30 $202,950
$6.25
$384,375
$2.70
$166,050
$753,375
CONEJO R.P.D.
$3.30 $0
$6.25
$0
$2.70
$0
$0
FILLMORE
13,200
$0
$6.25
$82,500
$2.70
$35,640
$118,140
'29 600
0 $9T680
S6.42
j1g5-000
$79-920
$362,600
_..MOORPARK
OJAI
8,200
$0
$6.25
$ 1,250
$2.70
$22,140
$73,390
OXNARD
158,300
$3.30 $522,390
$6.25
$989,375
$2.70
$427,410
$1,939,175
PLEASANT VALLEY
$3.30 $0
$6.25
$0
$2.70
$0
$0
PORT HUENEME
22,600
$3.30 $74,580
$6.25
$141,250
$2.70
$61,020
$276,850
RANCHO SIMI R.P.D.
$3.30 $0
$6.25
$0
$2.70
$0
$0
SAN BUENAVENTURA
102,300
$3.30 $337,590
$6.25
$639,375
$2.70
$276,210
$1,253,175
SANTA PAULA
27,100
$0
$6.25
$169,375
$2.70
$73,170
$242,545
SIMI VALLEY
108,900
$0
$6.25
5680,625
$2.70
$294,030
$974,655
THOUSAND OAKS
117,600
$3.30 $388,080
$6.25
$735,000
$2.70
$317,520
$1,440,600
VENTURA COUNTY
742,000
$1.70 $1,261,400
$4.00
$2,968,000
$0
$4,229,400
County Total
$11,663,905
YOLO
COUNTY
DAVIS
56,000
$3.30 $184,800
$6.25
$350,000
$0
$534,800
WEST SACRAMENTO
30,450
$3.30 $100,485
$6.25
$190,312
$0
$290,797
WINTERS
5,350
$0
$6.25
$33,438
$0
$33,438
WOODLAND
45,600
$0
$6.25
$285,000
$0
$285,000
POLO COUNTY
158,800
$0
$4.00
$635,200
$0
$635,200
County Total
$1,779,235
YUBA
COUNTY
MARYSVILLE
12,150
$3.30 $40,095
$6.25
$75,938
$0
$116,033
OLIVEHURST P.U.D.
$0
$6.25
$0
$0
s0
WHEATLAND
1,940
$0
$6.25
$30,000
$0
$30,000
YUBA COUNTY
60,400
$0
$4.00
$241,600
$0
$241,600
County Total
$387,633
$182,177,217
$308,047,972
$44,361,352
$511,477,590
California State Parks - Local Services Section [1999 -12 -151 Page 15
Proposition 12: Bonds: Parks, Water, and Coastal Protection Act ' mp: iiwww. 'ao.ca.goviiniriatjvcs'2^rr /'. -^ ^' ^.'I,..r'
Figure 1
Use of Bond Funds Under Proposition 12
(In Millions) - - -- --
Grants to Local Governments and Nonprofit Groups
To fund recreational areas, with grant amount based on population of the local area (such as a city, county, or park
district). i $388.0
For recreational areas primarily in urban areas, as follows: i 00.0
1 an areas - -$138 million.
Large urban areas (cities over 300,000 population and county or park districts over 1,000,000
population) - -$28 million.
I
• ither urban or rural areas based on need - -$34 million.
,--To local agencies for various recreational, cultural, and natural areas.
102.5
;For recreational areas, youth centers, and environmental improvement projects benefitting youth in areas of
significant poverty.
i
! 100.0
For recreational and cultural areas (including zoos and aquariums) in urban areas.
!For farmland nrote&ion -- — --
— 71.5 J
125 01
For soccer and baseball facilities to nonprofit groups that serve disadvantaged youth.
1501
To San Francisco for improvements at Golden Crate Park.
; 15.0
�— For urban forestry programs.
10.01
_-ijFor playground accessibility improvements using recycled materials.
7.01
To Alameda County for Camp Arroyo.
10
For conservation, water recycling, and recreation in Sonoma County.
2.0
;For community centers in Galt, Gilroy, and San Benito County.
1.0
For a wild animal rehabilitation center in the San Bernardino Mountains.
1.0
:Total, Grants to Local Governments and Nonprofit Groups
! $940.01
'State Projects
Io buv, improve, or renovate recreational areas. _
—1 $525.0
!To acquire and preserve natural areas.
i 355.01
-To acquire and preserve fish and wildlife habitat.
277.5
To pay the California Conservation Corps for work on projects funded by this proposition.
2.5
,Total, State Projects
!$1,160.0 1
Operational Costs. The state and local governments that buy or improve property with these
bond funds will incur additional costs to operate or manage these properties. These costs may
be offset partly by revenues from those properties, such as entrance fees. The net additional
costs (statewide) could potentially be in the tens of millions of dollars annually.
2 of 3 1/3/00 10:23 PM
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Servicesr)C
DATE: January 22, 2000 (Meeting of February 7, 2000)
SUBJECT: Consider Selection of Parks and Recreation
Commissioners to Serve on Park Name Ad Hoc Committee
BACKGROUND
At its meeting on January 19, the City Council took a second
look at the recommendation forwarded by the Parks and Recreation
Commission on a name for the park in Specific Plan 92 -1
(Carlsberg) . The name being recommended by the Commission was
Sereno Ridge Park. At the request of the City Council, the
Commission is being asked to reconsider its recommendation and
report back to the City Council.
DISCUSSION
Councilmember Chris Evans, who did not have an opportunity to
discuss the recommended park name when it was first discussed on
January 5, suggested that the Commission be asked to reconsider
its original name recommendation. In light of the historic
importance of Moorpark's centennial, marking the community's 100
years, it was felt that a park name recognizing the milestone
would be appropriate.
It was suggested that names of prominent individuals who played
important roles in the founding and establishment of Moorpark
community be considered. Additionally, the City Council
requested that the Commission seek suggestions from the
Centennial Committee, a small committee recently formed to
recognize Moorpark's Centennial, and, the Moorpark Historical
Society. The Commission is in receipt of a letter, signed by
the chairman of the Centennial Committee and the president of
Carlsberg Park Name
Page 2
the Historical Society. The name the two organizations suggest
is Centennial Park.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has had good results using
two - member ad hoc committees, and it is recommended that such a
committee be formed to identify a park name, using the direction
provided by the City Council. The ad hoc committee would then
present its recommendation to the full Commission for
consideration.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission select
two of its members to serve on an ad hoc committee to develop a
recommendation of a name for the park in Specific Plan 92 -1
(Carlsberg).
MAMLindleyTARKS \carlsberg pk name 2 commagd.doc
8 . ,6
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: January 22, 2000 (Meeting of February 7, 2000)
SUBJECT: Update on the July 3rd Fireworks Advisory Committee
BACKGROUND
The July 3rd Fireworks Advisory Committee met on January 12. The
Commission was represented by Chair Dubreuil and Commissioner
Catrambone. The Committee is also comprised of Mayor Pro Tem
Wozniak; Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services; Gwen
Indermill, Recreation Superintendent; and Stephanie Shaw,
Recreation Coordinator. The purpose of this meeting was to
discuss the scope of the Committee and how best to recruit
additional members.
As recommended by the Commission, and with the concurrence of
the City Council, interested residents and representatives for
the various service organizations will also be invited to
participate on the Committee. Letters were sent to Moorpark
service organizations and a press release was drafted to
encourage attendance at the next meeting of the Committee
scheduled for February 2 at 4 p.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file.
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home _folders \MLindley \RECREAT \july 3 commt commagd.doc
8
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services ',lam
DATE: January 22, 2000 (Meeting of February 7, 2000)
SUBJECT: Consider Selection of Park and Recreation
Commissioners to Serve on Youth Sports Committee
BACKGROUND
The City has a Youth Sports Committee comprised of two Parks and
Recreation Commissioners and a representative from each of the
Moorpark youth sports organizations. The purpose of the
Committee is to receive input and feedback from the youth sports
organizations, coordinate the use of park facilities, and to
identify share information about long -term goals and current and
future needs. The Committee meets twice a year, typically on a
weekday evening.
The Committee has not met in over a year, not since the seating
of the current Commission. It is staff's intent to schedule a
meeting of the Committee within the next 60 days. The
Commission is being asked to select two of its members to serve
on the Youth Sports Committee for the year.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission select
two members to serve on the Youth Sports Committee.
M: \MLindley \youth sport comm commagd.doc
(A
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services iliL�
DATE: January 22, 2000 (Meeting of February 7, 2000)
SUBJECT: Consider Date for Spring Park Tour
BACKGROUND
-Z_ C� 12-
Each year the Parks and Recreation Commission holds two Park
Tours. The purpose of the "Tours" is to provide the Commission
with an opportunity to walk through the parks to observe
residents using the parks and identify any improvements that it
may deem desirable.
The City notices the Park Tour as a special meeting of the
Commission, and the meeting is published. Staff develops a
tentative time schedule that identifies when the Commission will
be at the various parks on the "Tour ". Residents are invited to
participate in the "Tour" or they can be present at one or more
of the parks to provide input.
The spring Park Tour is particularly important because it falls
just prior to the development of the new fiscal year budget. The
Commission will be looking for improvements that it may want to
recommend for inclusion in the new budget. To allow for a
thorough discussion of particular parks, the Commission is also
being asked to select which parks it would like to include on
the "Tour ".
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Commission select a Sunday in the
month of March or April to conduct its spring Park Tour and
identify which parks to include on the "Tour ".
M: \MLindley \spring 2000 park tour commagd.doc