The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG RPTS 2001 0904 PR SPCMOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 NOTICE AND CALL OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF MOORPARK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Moorpark is hereby called to be held on Tuesday, September 4, 2001, commencing at 6:30 p.m. Said meeting will meet at the Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 27th day of August, 2001, at Moorpark, California. Patty Le cke Administrative Secretary, Community Services Department PATRICK HUNTER CLINT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS KEITH F. MILLHOUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Counalmember Councilmember Counalmember City of Moorpark ) County of Ventura ) ss. State of California I, Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary of the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I posted a copy of the "Notice and Call of a Special Meeting" for the Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission, scheduled for September 4, 2001, to commence at 6:30 p.m. located at Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Executed this 27th day of August 2001, at Moorpark, California. Patty L cke Administrative Secretary MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA September 4, 2001 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Craig Chal.]y, Quentin CeCuardi, nom Pflaumer, and Chair Sandra Thompson. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Staff's Monthly Report. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of June 4, 2001. Staff Recommendation: Approve as presented. B. Approval of the Minutes from the Joint Meeting of the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission_ Staff Recommendation: Approve as presented. C. Recreation Programming Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report. U. Parks Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report. Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speaker Cards must be received by the Recording Secretary prior to the Public Comments portion of the meeting. Speakers will be heard in the order that their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. Copies of the reports or other xvritten documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any Agenda item may be directed to the Community Services Department Secretary. 799 Moorpark Avenuc, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6227. PATRICK HUNTER CLINT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS KEITH F. MILLHOUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember -.� -ks and Recreatior:. Commission rgenda September 4, 20; Page 8. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: :,. Consider Skatepark _Options. Staff ec::rur:endatior: Commission to discuss Skat.epar:-, options and pro': i d- comments. B. Consider Proposed Playground equipment for the Commur_i.'_y Center Park. Staff Recommendation: Approve playground equipment for the Community Center Park recommended b- t.f:_ Ad floc Committee. i'. Rev .ew !)a-,k Borid lnfcrmation ;Propos_ition 1 -a Rec:o,mmendation: Recei%7e ar:a f-L..e report - -- Consider Ad Hoc C.;rrI t4 Lr_ees ;: - -r _Playground Equ'pmen= Staff Recommendation: Select two Ad Hoc Committees :omurisecl o`7 t':do Park"> end Recreation C.omm'_5si I'll I:E-�rS rC, de ,- C,l -cp -playground des i.gn rec:).Tim(-,ndatiO "ls Tor lPlountai r. "eado',:7s Park and Vii.ia Campekna Par:c. .,. aY' ;S :- ili rcatl -:iI .0-imiSS10I. l L, !'ai'.ti i'Ci�l�. R e C'ommc ndatlon: SE --: ec' a d a t =• ;i7,a time o conduC le t A 1 _ Pa-k 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 10. ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Moorpark, California June 4, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Thompson called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. 2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Chally led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Craig Chally, Quentin DeGuardi, Thomas Pflaumer, and Chair Sandra Thompson. Staff Present: Mary Lindley, Director. of Commun'ty Services; Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent; and Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary. 4. PROCLAMATION, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Staff's Monthlv Report. Mary Lindley deferred the monthly report until the next regularly scheduled meeting. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of May 7, 2001. Staff Recommendation: Approve as presented. B. Spring Camp Status Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report. Parks 5 Recreation Commission Minutes une 4, 2001. Page 2 MOTION: Commissioner Cha11y moved t.o approve the C;)nsenL Calendar as presented. Commissioner Pflaumer seconded. The motion carried 3 -0. B. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: A. Moorpark Ater Dark Presentation. No report or staff recommendation . �------ _ -- - -- Gwen I- nderrnill. gave a presentation reviewing the crevious nine months in w iich --his dance has been nelc or a monthly basis. Her presentation included the results of a teen poll which was taken, and the information was then used in the planning of the different_ act vities `or each dance. Some entertainment offered in addition to music and dancing i.s athletics, names, prizes, food, and concession l o,-1 tnJ. Staff encouraged the Commission to attend, ana 1. f p:,ssible, voiunteer for the evening. Vol"In eer support. S essential fior this event, because of the Large attendance each month. ?. Consider_ Location and for a _C_i.ty Skatepark. Staff Recommendation: Discuss ideas for one or more skatecarks and set a date to tour neighbc.r.i.no, faci:i_ities . Mary Lindley stated that the construction c:f a skatepark has been an item of discussion for many years. It was agreed by the Council and Commissi:�r. Ezr, their joint meeting that this issue sho,.zid now ire a priority. The Commission discussed different iocations for the skatepark and if one or more skateparks is desired. Before making any recommendations, it was decided that they conduct their tour to surrounding skateparks. The Commission also suggested a workshop be heed, specifically to hear the input of skaters ir. the community. They would then be better informed as to what would best suit the needs of the residents. Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes June 4, 20001 Page 3 A date for the tour will be arranged during the upcoming week. C. Consider Parks' Capital Improvement Projects Report. Staff Recommendation: For Commission to discuss report and provide comments. Mary Lindley stated that this item was also discussed at the recent Joint Meeting of the Council and Commission. The proposed list being presented is meant to be a starting point and this item will probably take a few meetings to finalize. Mary Lindley suggested that the Commission could begin by reviewing the proposed list. The Commission reviewed staff's proposed list and made the following comments and additions: • All Parks: Replace or install monument signs; at designated parks, construct meeting room facilities. • Mountain Meadows: Adding handicap access from parking lot to ball diamond is a priority item. • Glenwood Park: To expand out and install a parking lot and restroom in the expanded area. • Poindexter Park: Potential site for a skatepark; install ballfield lighting; construct a snack bar facility; • Pliller Park: Install ballfield lighting. Commissioner Pflaumer suggested that the finalized CIP list be referred to when the biannual park tours are conducted. Commissioner DeGuardi stated that this document should be reviewed periodically for updates. Parks S Recreation -oII ni ssion Minutes rune 4, 2001 Paige 4 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Commissioner Pflaumer announced the Moorpark After Dar k Dance- being held at the Boys and Cirls Club this month, o:i cr dozy, June 8. He encoar aged residents to volunteer their time at the dance. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Thcrpsc;n adjourned the meeting at 8:4- p.m. APPROVED: SANDRA THOMPSON, CHAIRMAN Respectfully submitted: Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Moorpark, California May 24, 2001 A special Joint Meeting of the Moorpark City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission was held on May 24, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. at the Moorpark Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the City Council to order and Chair Thompson called the Parks and Recreation Commission to order at 6:47 p.m. 2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services. 3. ROLL CALL: City Council: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, and Mayor Hunter. Absent: Councilmember Wozniak. Parks & Recreation Commissioners Catrambone, DeGuardi, Commission: Pflaumer, and Chair Thompson. Absent: Commissioner Chally. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT: Mr. Mike Dillehay, 476 W. Los Angeles AVE Moorpark business owner and he spoke construction of a permanent skatepark Dillehay stated that he, his friends, and surrounding cities on a regular basis to Mr. Dillehay stated his opinion that !nue, stated he is a in favor of the in Moorpark. Mr. customers travel tc use the skateparks. not only will a Minutes of the City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission Moorpark, California Page 2 May 24, 2001 permanent skatepark be heavily used, but it will also bring business to City stores. 5. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Presentation by Ventura County Flood Control District Representatives regarding Improvement Plans for the Arroyo Simi. (No agenda report or staff recommendation.) Representatives from the Vei District were Mr. Jeff Pratt, Musgrove, Manager of Quality Taylor, Manager of Operations Mr. Hassan Kasraie, Manager Division. 7tura County Flood Control Deputy Director; Ms. Vicki Control Division; Mr. Mike & Maintenance Division; and of Planning & Regulatory Mr. Pratt gave a brief presentation on the Arroyo Simi channel. Mr. Pratt and Mr. Kasraie discussed the District's improvement plans with the Council and City staff. Discussion included leaving designated areas as natural as possible, to include a number of recreational uses along the Arroyo, and to provide the City with a sample agreement for use of the District's maintenance road for trail purposes. B. Consider Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. Staff Recommendation: Consider and discuss Goals and Objectives for FY 2001/02. Mayor Hunter suggested that the Council and Commission begin by reviewing the objectives being presented by the Commission in the agenda report. Commissioner Catrambone stated that he feels that before any consideration be given to having ballfield lights installed at Miller Park, the matter of lighting some of the older parks should be addressed. Commissioner Pflaumer disagreed and stated that he feels ballfield lights should be installed at Miller Park. He also stated that not all youth sports should be focused at Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP). Minutes of the City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission Moorpark, California Page 3 May 24, 2001 Mr. Kueny stated that perhaps the installation of lights at existing basketball courts should also be considered at this time. Councilmember Millhouse stated that he feels an important short term goal is the build out of AVCP, with the inclusion of additional sports fields and lights. Also, he stated he would like to see a permanent skatepark, the development of a trail system, enlarging the parking lot at Miller Park, and relocating Moorpark Little League to another area that would better accommodate their growth. Mayor Hunter inquired if Commissioner Pflaumer still felt as strongly about opening a second vehicle access to AVCP. Commissioner Pflaumer said yes, but would like to see the construction of a permanent skatepark first. Chair Thompson stated that because the teen programs now have such large participation and continue to show popularity with the teens, she would like to include the construction of a teen center as an objective. She stated that it might be beneficial to locate it at the same site as the skatepark. She also stated that a Youth Master Plan should be a priority. Councilmember Mikos stated that a permanent location for a skatepark needs to be identified. She also stated that she does not necessarily agree with the installation of lights at Miller Park. While lights at the softball field would be acceptable, a lighted soccer field could affect the surrounding wildlife as well as the residents. Councilmember Mikos stated she agrees with the summer Beach Bus and would like to see it implemented by this summer. Councilmember Harper stated that he feels ballfield lighting at Miller Park would have minimal affect on the nearby residents and wildlife. However, he stated he is not in favor of lights at the soccer field. He also stated he supports the construction of a skatepark, but requested that staff review with surrounding cities the Minutes of the City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission Moorpark, California Page 4 May 24, 2001 cost and problems that will have to be dealt with, which may affect a location decision. Councilmember Harper stated he would like to see the completion of the community pool. Commissioner DeGuardi suggested that perhaps the City could try temporary lighting at Miller Park to determine the effect on the residents and the wildlife. Mayor Hunter requested that staff evaluate the feasibility of using an online program at AVRC for registration of recreation classes and sports. He also requested an update on the status of AVCP Phase II. Ms. Lindley stated that the City is proceeding on the construction of the second restroom and will be conducting interviews before selecting the architect for the community pool. Mayor Hunter stated that the Council has a copy of the geotechnical report on the proposed pool site and that he would like the report discussed at an upcoming Council meeting. He requested the selected architect be invited to attend the Council meeting. Councilmember Mikos stated that she feels the City should proceed with the pool and with the construction of a skatepark. She also stated she would also like to see a trail system established. Commissioner Catrambone stated he would like to see some amenities planned for Villa Campesina Park. Chair Thompson stated that she would like to see the City establish some type of agreement for maintenance responsibilities with the sports organizations who use the City's fields. Mr. Kueny stated that this issue can be addressed with renewal of the sports agreements. Minutes of the City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission Moorpark, California Page 5 May 24, 2001 6. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the City Council and Chair Thompson adjourned the Parks and Recreation Commission at 8:15 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor Sandra Thompson, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Kueny, City Manager FROM: Gwen lndermill, Recreation Superintendent DATE: July 11, 2001 SUBJECT: Quarterly Report on Recreation Programming Spring Quarter: April - June 2001 This memo serves as a review of the recreation programs and facility rentals for the spring quarter of 2001 including events. The attached illustrates the comparison from season to season and year to year from Spring 1998 to the present. This chart shows how registrations vacillate from season to season but also shows a steady upward trend that overshadows minor seasonal variations. SPRING EVENTS Easter Egg Hunt Day and Date: Saturday, April 14, 2001 Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Location: Arroyo Vista Community Park Event /Activity Features: Egg hunts for ages two to twelve, pony rides, jolly jumps, food vendors, and photos with the Easter Bunny. Programmatic changes were made this year to increase the quality and scope of this program. Direct costs increased in order to purchase equipment for this year and future Egg Hunts. Additional part time staff were used help the program run more efficiently. Easter Egg Hunt 2001 2000 1999 1998 Age Group Children Children Children Children Target Group Participants 627 710 550 Unavailable Total Participants 1500 1500 1,200 800 Volunteers 30 30 41 25 Direct Costs $1317 $937 $1,281 $1,219 Part Time Staff Costs $536 $96 $120 $126 Total Costs $1853 $1033 $1,402 $1,346 Total Revenue $866 $974 $858 $11 Net Expenditure $987 $59 $544 $1,335 Direct Cost Per Participant $0.88 $0.63 $1.06 $1.52 Total Cost Per Participant $1.24 $0.69 $1.17 $1.68 Revenue Per Participant $0.58 $0.65 $0.72 $.01 Net Expenditure Per Participant $0.66 $0.04 $0.45 $1.67 Coordinator Hours 60 45 48 40 Superintendent Hours 8 10 SPRING CLASSES Class registrations decreased in spring 2001. The loss of several veteran instructors, inclement weather, and new class offerings which were not successful contributed to the decline. Recreational Classes 2001 2000 1999 1998 Students 646 828 698 565 Classes Offered 119 110 99 96 Ran 91 100 83 76 Canceled 28 24%, 10 9% 16 16% 20 200/0 Direct Costs 520,462 $23,584 $16,148 $12,320 Instructor payments 520,462 523,302 S15,802 S 12,213 Supplies S0 5282 5346 S 107 Gross Revenue $40,936 544,355 $28,999 $21,736 Refunds and credits 56,526 54,358 53,547 $2,030 Net Revenue $13,948 $16,413 $9,304 $7,386 Direct Cost Per Participant 531.67 ,28.48 823.13 $21.(W Gross Revenue Per Participant '63.67 $53.56 $41.54 x'38.47 Net Revenue Per Participant $21.59 S19.82 y13.32 $13.07 Coordinator Hours (approximate) 30 55 55 50 SPRING CAMP MOORPARK This is the third year Camp Moorpark has successfully been offered during the Moorpark Unified School District spring break. Programmatic changes have contributed to increased enrollment. The number of children participating in the program increased this year, from 46 in 2000 to 61 this year. Average daily attendance also increased, from 40 in 2000 to 44 this year. Spring Camp 2000 was held for six days (total attendance 224), versus this year's camp was held for five days (total attendance 219). With continued programmatic changes it is anticipated the program will grow next year. Spring Camp 2001 2000 1999 1998 Participants 61 46 49 Not Offered Direct Costs $909 $649 $450 Staff costs S1836 S1664 $1,234 Total Costs $2745 $2314 $1,684 Gross Revenue $4692 $4430 $3,944 Net Revenue $1947 $2115 52,260 Total Cost Per Participant $45.00 .50.30 $4.37 Gross Revenue Per Participant $76.91 $96.30 $80.49 Net Revenue Per Participant $31.91 $45.90 $46.12 Coordinator Hours (approximate) 60 40 40 SPRING ADULT LEAGUES The adult softball program registrations remain consistent, with a high percentage of returning teams. Recent changes in the program have included improving the quality of the program. New awards included T -shirts that can be worn as team uniforms. Addressing uniform attire will contribute to an improved team appearance on the field. As a result teams are encouraged to return for multiple seasons. The number of adult basketball teams increased this past season. Staff has improved the officiating staff. Lastly, the women's program remained steady over the past quarter with little change in registration numbers. Softball 2001 2000 1999 1998 Teams 32 36 29 30 Direct Costs $3,430 $4,003 $3,238 $4,144 Facility Costs $1,190 $1,235 $1,434 $1,323 ($7.35 per hr for lights) Part Time Staff Costs $1,244 $1,519 $1,145 $1,151 Total Costs $5,864 $6,756 $5,818 $6,619 Gross Revenue $11,798 $12,702 $10,003 $11,047 Net Revenue $5,934 $5,946 $4,184 $4,427 Direct Cost Per Team $107.19 $111.19 $111.67 $138.16 Total Cost Per Team $183.25 $187.67 $200.63 $220.65 Gross Revenue Per Team $368.88 $352.83 $344.93 $368.23 Net Revenue Per Team $185.44 $165.17 $144.31 $147.58 Coordinator flours 60 40 50 50 Basketball 2001 2000 1999 1998 Tcams 13 10 16 16 Direct Costs $662 $502 $741 5722 Facility Costs $996 5950 $1,152 $1,152 (Gym a; 512 per hr ; light.$) Part Time Staff Costs S1,368 $1,250 $1,701 $1,874 Total Costs 53,026 $2,702 53,594 $3,748 Gross Revenue $3,926 $3,120 $5,057 $5,232 Net Revenue $900 $170 $1,462 $1,483 Direct Cost Per Team 550.92 S50.20 546.34 $45.13 Total Cost Per Team $232. 77 $270.20 5224.66 5234.31 Gross Revenue Per Teant 5302 5312 ,5316.10 $327.00 Net Revenue Per Team $69.23 $17 $91.40 $92.69 Coordinator hours 25 25 24 30 Women's League (Soccer) 2001 2000 1999 1998 Participants 50 42 44 68 Direct Costs $432 5468 $521 $721 Facility Costs S 1 17 $150 $126 S120 (7.35 per hr.for tights) Part Time Staff Costs S69 S69 $69 S87 Total Costs 5618 $687 5716 S928 Cross Revenue $1,450 $1,218 $1,276 51,727.50 Net Revenue $832 $531 $560.28 $799.28 Direct Cost Per Participant 58.64 tiH.14 $11.84 $10.61 Total Cost Per Participant $12.36 $16.36 $16.27 513.63 Gross Revetrue Per Participant $29.00 $29.00 .5'29.00 '525.00 Net Revenue Per Participant 516.64 $12.64 $12.73 $11.73 Coordinator Hours 8 8 10 16 SPRING YOUTII LEAGUES The Junior Basketball League experienced an increase in registration over the past quarter. In the Junior Basketball League, the age divisions were changed to 5 -6, 7 -8, 9 -10, 11 -12, and a Teen Division. With the continued success in the tot sports classes, staff felt that adding five- year -olds to the program would increase the registration numbers while still serving the core basketball population. The Junior T -Ball program continued with a slight decrease. Staff is looking to improve the marketing and quality of this program next year. JBL 2001 2000 1999 1998 Participants 227 193 163 144 Direct Costs $5,655 $6,422 $4,278 $3,137 Facility Costs $1,315 $960 $720 $540 ($12 per hour + lights) $1,716 $2,444 $1,364 $1,232 Part Time Staff Hours 130 $1,176 $549 $552 Part Time Staff Costs S1,105 $1,042 $675 $520 Total Costs $8,075 $8,424 $5,673 $4,197 Gross Revenue $11,804 $9,821 $8,060 $6,606 Net Revenue $3,729 $1,397 $2,387 $2,409 Direct Cost Per Participant $35.57 $33.27 $26.25 $21.79 Total Cost Per Participant $35.75 $43.65 $34.80 $29.15 Gross Revenue Per Participant $52.00 $50.89 $49.45 $45.88 Net Revenue Per Participant $16.43 $7.24 $14.64 $16.73 Coordinator Hours 60 45 40 45 T -Ball League 2001 2000 1999 1998 Participants 33 52 31 28 Direct Costs $757 $1,129 $743 S609 Part Time Staff Costs $86 S139 $70 $69 Total Costs S843 $1,268 $814 $679 Gross Revenue $1,716 $2,444 $1,364 $1,232 Net Revenue $873 $1,176 $549 $552 Direct Cost Per Participant $22.93 $21.71 $23.98 $21.77 Total Cost Per Participant $25.55 $24.38 $26.27 $24.25 Gross Revenue Per Participant $52.00 $47.00 $44.00 $44.00 Net Revenue Per Participant $26.45 $22.62 $17.73 $19.75 Coordinator Hours 20 20 15 20 TEEN PROGRAMS Teen programming has continued to increase over the quarter. Activities, including, monthly After Dark dances, Get a Job Workshop, Battle of the Bands "Arroyopalooza ", Band Jams, Coco Loco Luau, Skate Fest, and Skatepark were offered during the quarter. The Teen Council involvement increased dramatically this year. The teens concluded their term with a presentation at 6"' City Council Meeting, and their term ended on .Tune 30, 2001 This is the first quarter staff has kept attendance records for teen programs. For the spring quarter, 3,230 teens participated in teen activities. Staff Hours Overall Attendance 2001 Teen Programs 3,230 General Programming: After Dark: The teen dances were held on May 18 at the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and April 27 and June 8 at the Boys and Girls Club. Event attendance has continued to increase. The May 18 dance had 502 teens attend, while the April 27 dance had 450 teens and June 8 had approximately 517 teens. Band Jams: Band .lams were held on April 6 and May 4. Four local bands performed live in front of an audience of 250 high school aged teens on 4/6, and 175 on 5; 4. Battle of the Bands: Battle of the Bands "Arroyopalooza" was held April 28, 2001. 400 teens attended and enjoyed performances by ten local bands, food vendors, special attractions, and skatepark. Coco Loco Luau: Coco Loco luau was held June 29, 2001. Over 290 teens enjoyed deejay, dancing, food booth, volleyball, and a Tsunami Slide. Get A Job Workshop: Amgen's Chief Talent Scout hosted this workshop on April 11, 2001. The workshop provided teens insight to job searching, resume writing, and interview techniques. Magic Mountain Excursion: Staff coordinated a teen trip to Six Flags Magic Mountain. The trip was cancelled due to lack of enrollment. Skate Fest: Skate Fest was held June 2, 2001. Over 200 participants enjoyed new skate ramps, deejay, skateboard demonstration team, Teen Council concession booth, and raffle prizes. Skatepark: The Skatepark continued to see steady participation over the majority of the spring quarter with approximately 426 participants using the Skatepark on Tuesdays and Wednesdays for the quarter. The end of June saw a drop off in participants due to strict enforcement of Skatepark rules and regulations (i.e. elbow and kneepads). Contests were held April 11, May 9, and June 13 where approximately 31 teens participated. Prizes were awarded to the winners. Moorpark After Dark 2001 2000 1999 1998 Part Time Staff Hours 302.5 $1516.05 Part Time Staff Hours 49 Veen Coordinator 1321.5 N/A N/A N/A Recreation Coordinator 60 100 89 75 Superintendent 80 30 65 50 Overall Attendance 2001 Teen Programs 3,230 General Programming: After Dark: The teen dances were held on May 18 at the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and April 27 and June 8 at the Boys and Girls Club. Event attendance has continued to increase. The May 18 dance had 502 teens attend, while the April 27 dance had 450 teens and June 8 had approximately 517 teens. Band Jams: Band .lams were held on April 6 and May 4. Four local bands performed live in front of an audience of 250 high school aged teens on 4/6, and 175 on 5; 4. Battle of the Bands: Battle of the Bands "Arroyopalooza" was held April 28, 2001. 400 teens attended and enjoyed performances by ten local bands, food vendors, special attractions, and skatepark. Coco Loco Luau: Coco Loco luau was held June 29, 2001. Over 290 teens enjoyed deejay, dancing, food booth, volleyball, and a Tsunami Slide. Get A Job Workshop: Amgen's Chief Talent Scout hosted this workshop on April 11, 2001. The workshop provided teens insight to job searching, resume writing, and interview techniques. Magic Mountain Excursion: Staff coordinated a teen trip to Six Flags Magic Mountain. The trip was cancelled due to lack of enrollment. Skate Fest: Skate Fest was held June 2, 2001. Over 200 participants enjoyed new skate ramps, deejay, skateboard demonstration team, Teen Council concession booth, and raffle prizes. Skatepark: The Skatepark continued to see steady participation over the majority of the spring quarter with approximately 426 participants using the Skatepark on Tuesdays and Wednesdays for the quarter. The end of June saw a drop off in participants due to strict enforcement of Skatepark rules and regulations (i.e. elbow and kneepads). Contests were held April 11, May 9, and June 13 where approximately 31 teens participated. Prizes were awarded to the winners. Moorpark After Dark 2001 Event Dates (5/18) Participants 502 Direct Costs $1516.05 Part Time Staff Hours 49 Part Time Staff Costs 5533.79 Total Costs $2049.84 (includes Teen Coordinator) Gross Revenue $2319 Net Revenue $269.16 Direct Cost Per Participant $3.02 Total Cost Per Participant $4.08 Gross Revenue Per Participant $4.62 Net Revenue Per Participant $0.54 Teen Coordinator Hours 25 Recreation Coordinator Hours 4 Superintendent Hours 6 Band Jam Event Dates (4/6, 5/4) Participants Direct Costs Part Time Staff Hours Part Time Staff Costs Total Costs Gross Revenue Net Revenue Direct Cost Per Participant Total Cost Per Participant Gross Revenue Per Participant Net Revenue Per Participant Teen Coordinator Hours Recreation Coordinator Hours Superintendent Hours Battle of the Bands Event Date (4/28) Participants Direct Costs Part Time Staff Hours Part Time Staff Costs Total Costs Gross Revenue Net Revenue Direct Cost Per Participant Total Cost Per Participant Gross Revenue Per Participant Net Revenue Per Participant Teen Coordinator Hours Recreation Coordinator Hours Superintendent Hours 2001 375 $50 31 $178.05 (includes Teen Coordinator) $228.05 $38.25 (concessions) $- 189.80 $0.13 $0.61 50.10 S-0.51 12 5 5 400 $933.60 62 $680.35 (includes Teen Coordinator) $1613.95 $1431.55 $-182.40 $2.33 54.03 53.58 S-0.46 60 3 10 Coco Loco Luau Event Date (6/29) Participants Direct Costs ['art Time Staff Hours Part Time Staff Costs Total Costs Gross Revenue Net Revenue Direct Cost Per Participant Total Cost Per Participant Gross Rel,enue Per Participant Net Revenue Per Participant Teen Coordinator Hours Recreation Coordinator Hours Superintendent Flours Skate Fest Event Date (6/2) Participants Direct Costs Part Time Staff Hours Part Time Staff Costs Total Costs Gross Revenue Net Revenue Direct Cost Per Participant Total Cost Per Participant Gross Revenue Per Participant Nct Revenue Per Participant Teen Coordinator Hours Recreation Coordinator Hours Superintendent Hours 290 $1737.89 50 5576.04 (includes Teen Coordinator) $2313.93 S1437.40 $- 876.59 $5.99 57.97 54.95 $ -3.02 40 �5 S 200 $375 15 5149 ( includes Teed Coordinator) $564 $76.25 (concessions) $- 487.75 $1.88 52.82 $.38 S -2.43 30 5 BROCHURE The following information does not include the City Clerk's portion of the brochure costs for the City Newsletter. Revenue from ad sales has risen slightly, helping to offset the net cost of printing. Brochure Costs 2001 2000 1999 1998 Printing Cost $3436 $3476 $2,483 $1,830 Mailing Cost $1256 $1087 $1,029 $832 Total Cost $4,692 $4563 $3,512 $2,662 Ads 12 12 12 10 Revenue $1,625 $1435 $1,245 $705 Net Cost $3,067 $3128 $2,267 $1,957 FACILITY AND NARK RENTALS Although revenue remained consistent with last year, potential park rental revenue was lost this quarter. Potential revenue from picnic pavilions and potential tournament rental fees impacted revenue this quarter. With the recent amendment to the park rental fee schedule provides for pavilion rentals to conclude at dusk versus 10:00 p.m. Although rental groups continue to use the park pavilion until 10:00 p.m., they arc not assessed additional fees. Potential revenue ($6,000), was also impacted while staff conducted remedial turf repair. AVCP soccer fields were dark this quarter. A Memorial Dav Soccer Tournament was not conducted during this quarter, (potential revenue $3,400). Youth Sports Organization post season tournament fees were waived for AYSO ($2,100) and Moorpark Girls Softball Association ($500). The AVRC facility rentals have remained consistent over the past quarter. PARK RENTALS 2001 2000 1999 1998 Pen-nits 214 189 190 194 Part Time Hours 56 538 7 5370 Part Time Staff Costs 5532 .x',387 5370 Total Costs $532 56,166 53,621 Gross Revenue $7,377 $491 S5,796 Net Revenue $10,997 $10,622 $16,701 $9,610 Staff Cost per Rental S2.49 5109.75 .5411.07 5278.54 Gross Revenue Per Rental 534.47 561.38 5386.40 :Vet Revenue Per Rental 531.99 20 20 16 Coordinator Flours 40 45 40 35 Superintendent Hours 30 18 9 7 AVRC Rentals Permits 10 8 15 13 Part Time Hours 68 45.5 43.5 Part Time Staff Costs $646 538 7 5370 "Total Costs $646 .x',387 5370 Gross Revenue $3,1115 56,166 53,621 Net Revenue S2,469 $491 S5,796 Staff'Cost per Rental $64.60 548.35 524.67 Gross Revenue Per Rental $311.50 5109.75 .5411.07 5278.54 Net Revenue Per Rental $246.90 561.38 5386.40 Coordinator Hours 25 20 20 16 Superintendent Hours 25 15 15 7 %VRCPR1_SI:RV'k)ty Share '\.Everyone \Rcports'•tluarterly Reports',Spnno 2001 Quarterfy.doc AGENDA REPORT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF MOORPARK TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services Prepared By: Allen Walter, Supervisor of Maintenance and Operations DATE: July 24, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001) SUBJECT: Parks Quarterly Report April through June 2001 PARKS AVCP: A bid was secured in the amount of $1,500 for repainting the park pavilion. Park staff added a cement sidewalk at the storeroom area and at the monument sign. The Center's front planters had four trees and all shrubbery removed. The trees were causing damage to the walkway and the bushes had thorns, which scratched the children. Wood chips have been added until the replanted project can begin. Park staff and Sunridge jointly prepared the park for 3rd of July celebration. Several projects included painting, weed abatement, re- grading, adding chips to the planters and general clean up of undeveloped areas. The water line required for the new restrooms was located and noted on plans to assist with the upcoming construction. A resident requested weed abatement on City property that backs up to his property on Appleglen. It was completed by Sunridge. The soccer fields were reseeded and completed on schedule. The cost to date is $4,714. The irrigation well malfunctioned and staff repaired. Only one day of water was lost. The cost was $167. Well #2 (wood structure) was vandalized again and staff repaired. Four walkway security lights malfunctioned. An electrician was contacted and repaired. Glenwood Park: The playground sand had to be replaced, due to excessive dirt within the sand. The cost was $900. A park tree damaged the sidewalk along Courtney. The tree was removed and the sidewalk was repaired. Peach Hill Park: The restroom sewer line required major cleaning to stop an on -going blockage problem. The cost was S527. Page M: \PLemcke,M' ',.Commission',Agenda Report -Parks Quart.doc The basketball court was repainted with a non -slip paint after it was reported that the worn painted areas of the court had grown slippery. Campus Park: New playground equipment was installed. Miller Park: A new playground swing was delivered and has temporarily been stored until installation. Three bids were received and are being reviewed for the installation of a stamped concrete design in the front picnic area. An electricity tinier was added to the electrical outlet at the pavilion. This will control the on and off time, which is set at 6:00 am to 6:00 pm. Tierra Rejada Park: The perimeter wrought iron fence along Tierra Rejada Road was replaced. Also, a fence was installed at the tot lot. The spring toy in the tot lot was damaged beyond repair and a new one was ordered. A large crack was repaired on one of the two basketball courts. The park's basketball courts are scheduled to be resurfaced in the proposed FY 2001/02 budget. The restroom wall was vandalized when a 12" hole was knocked into the tile. Staff repaired. Mountain Meadows Park: A tree located by the playground was damaged and had to be removed. Replacement of the tree is in progress. Monte Vista Park: The Ventura County Fire Department requested that weed abatement be performed. It was completed at the end of May. The fence was vandalized twice and staff repaired. Better supports will be installed to stop future vandalizing. Poindexter Park: Two steel gazebos are on order to replace the missing and damaged ones. The City seal was added to the monument sign. Community Center Park: Five metal trashcans were received and will be installed, replacing the old wooden cans. Country Trail Park: The perimeter fence was repainted at a cost of $4,420. Villa Campesina Park: Three security lights were malfunctioning. An electrician contacted and they were repaired. Park Fibar /Sand Replacement: Playground sand and /or fibar was added to Poindexter, Griffin, Peach Hill, and Virginia Colony Parks. All Parks: The playground sand was rototilled at all the City parks except Glenwood Park. The sand had to be replaced due to excessive dirt throughout. Page 2 `1'•Plxmckc.hl •( ontmis,iu:nAgenda Rcport -Parks Quart.doc "A LA MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services DATE: August 22, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001) SUBJECT: Consider Skatepark Options BACKGROUND On June 4, 2001, the Commission was introduced to the topic of one or more skateparks in Moorpark. On June 27, several Commissioners participated in a tour of skateparks located in neighboring cities. The tour included facilities located in the following cities: Thousand Oaks (owned by Conejo Recreation and Parks District), Camarillo (owned by Pleasant Valley Recreation and Parks District), and Ventura. The following is a brief summary of the facilities we visited: Thousand Oaks - The skatepark is approximately 8,800 square feet and cost about $186,000 to design and build (without the $20,000 change order for drainage). The facility is fenced and locked during non operating hours. The facility is supervised when in use. Camarillo - This skatepark is approximately 16,000 square feet and cost about $200,000. The facility is fenced, although it is never locked nor supervised. (Pictures of this skatepark have been included as Attachments A, B, and C to this Report.) Ventura -This facility was considerably smaller than the other two we visited, approximately 3,000 square feet. This is one of three facilities in Ventura. It is not fenced nor supervised. The cost of this facility is unknown. Skatepark options Page 2 From the information staff was able to gather, the City can expect to pay appropriately $20 to $25 dollars per square foot to construct a concrete skatepark and approximately $12,000 for design. Based on feedback from agencies that operate skateparks, a skatepark facility should be no less than 10,000 square feet and preferably closer to 15,000 square feet. The Commission is also being presented with information about modular skateparks. These facilities are comprised of steel, plastic, or wooden ramps. Today, the ramps made for modular skateparks are very durable and well constructed. A modular skatepark can cost significantly less than a concrete facility, if an appropriate concrete or asphalt slab already exists. They also present more options for reconfiguring the ramps to add variety and /or to move the ramps to an alternative location if the original location is no longer desirable. Modular Ramp Option The option for the Commission to consider is the purchase of modular ramps designed to withstand the elements and to remain outside on a permanent basis. This differs from our current skate ramps which are less expensive and less durable. In an attempt to preserve the condition of the ramps, and due to the fact that we share the multipurpose court with roller hockey, City staff breaks down the ramps and stores them at the end of the day. Based on information from one skate ramp vendor, the City should anticipate paying approximately $50,000 to equip a skatepark consisting of 9,000 square feet (a single tennis court). A facility of this size will hold approximately 9 ramps. For a facility comprised of 15,000 square feet (two tennis courts), the City should expect to pay approximately $80,000. Such a facility could hold approximately 15 ramps. (Attachment D illustrates the potential configurations of a modular skatepark.) If the City were to proceed with a modular skatepark, it may be feasible to consider two facilities: one in the west or central part of the City and one in the college area. Two or more skateparks would provide greater accessibility and hopefully encourage skaters who are using street and park hardscape surfaces to make use of the skate ramps. \ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home_ folders \MLindley \Recreation \skatepark options commagd.doc Skatepark Options Page 3 Modular Verses Concrete Facilities In regards to advantages and disadvantages, as was already stated, some of the advantages of modular skateparks over concrete include: they cost significantly less than concrete facilities; they provide more flexibility so if different ramps become popular, the City can add them, and if in the future, skateparks lose their popularity, the concrete slab surface can be used for other purposes such as tennis or basketball. The disadvantage of a modular skatepark is that you cannot construct a bowl (or pool) for skating. Skaters often say they want a 10 foot deep bowl. This is what they see competitive skaters doing and they want to master similar skills. However, experience shows that these types of components are underutilized by local skaters because of their degree of difficulty. They tend to attract more proficient skaters on a regional bases. However, with the right modular ramps the average skater can receive a similar challenge offered by bowls. Other disadvantages include: the ramps need to be maintained regularly (i.e., tightening bolts and related minor maintenance), repainted every few years or so, and replaced every 8 to 10 years (appropriately $4,000 per ramp on average). Lastly, proficient, experienced skaters may not find modular ramps challenging enough. On the other hand, concrete facilities are more durable and they provide a greater challenge over modular parks. The need for major repairs is less, and as a result, requires less of ongoing expenditure. Skaters, especially experienced skaters, prefer concrete facilities with large ramps and deep bowls. The major disadvantage of a concrete skatepark is its initial cost and its long -term permanence in the event skating loses popularity. Also, a very challenging, state -of- the -art facility will attract experienced skaters from outside Moorpark and possibly intimidate young and less experienced skaters. Next Step If the City were to proceed with the concept of a modular skatepark, it has two options: locate the park(s) on an existing hardcourt (tennis or basketball courts) or construct a new concrete slab. Using an existing hardcourt would save the City considerable money. A concrete slab will cost approximately $7 per square foot, which equates to $84,000 for a 12,000 square foot facility. Ramps for a facility of that size would bring the \ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home_ folders \MLindley \Recreation \skatepark options commagd.doc Skatepark Options Page 4 total cost to approximately $154,000. In comparison, a 12,000 square foot concrete skatepark would cost approximately $210,000, plus. Possible sites to consider include the multi- purpose court at AVCP (this would displace Tri Valley Roller Hockey); the single tennis court at Tierra Rejada Park; one tennis court at Miller Park; or a new slab at AVCP, Griffin Park, Glenwood Park, or Mountain Meadows Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission provide staff with feedback regarding the type of skatepark desired and potential locations. \ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home_ folders \MLindley \Recreation \skatepark options commagd.doc AT TA C H M E I CHANGE IS GOOD IN iesigned three different skateparks to give you an idea of how many Aacles you can fit in a particular sized space. Then we've taken the 7,000 - 9.000 sq. ft. design and reconfigured it three different ways to demonstrate how versatile the layout can be. The number of transformations you can make is almost unlimited and they can all be accomplished in a matter of hours (even less when you have a park full of excited kids cheering you on). Ask for your RampltUp Configuration Kit. A miniature, 3- dimensional tool that allows you to visualize your park's potential. Arrange and rearrange configurations with the input of planners, parents and your skating public. ..the kids. VISIT OUR WEB SITE FOR MORE PRE - CONFIGURED PARKS. WWW.SKATEWAVERAMPS.COM { 3„ !Y V. "Flow" is critical to a skatepark and to skating. Flo, movement within y flow allows a skater ru rravei narurairy ana smoothly from one obstacle to another. Bad flow is a nasty, no -fun drag. Good flow enables skaters to easily link "moves" or "tricks. "SkateWave's incredible flexibility guarantees premium flow. And that is good. 1- 17T/9 c. H xo� I(; ? - 3,000 -5,000 SQUARE FEET ( neighborhood park ) 1,000 -9,000 SQUARE FEET ( single tennis court ) PON— 111 v 13,000- 15,000 SQUARE FEET ( double tennis court ) MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND The Parks and Recreation Commission Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services /)( August 26, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001) Consider Playground Equipment for Community Center Park On January 17, 2001, the City Council approved the expenditure of $55,000 to replace the playground equipment at the Community Center Park. This action was taken in response to a playground safety audit performed by City staff. The audit found potential safety concerns that have arisen as a result of newly adopted safety standards, not as a result of maintenance or misuse of the equipment. Subsequently, the Commission selected an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Commissioners Chally and DeGuardi. The Committee met on two separate occasions; once with a representative from Miracle Playground Systems and once to review a draft playground design. Additionally, staff has had several discussions with the Miracle representative to ensure that the proposed equipment meets all safety and ADA requirements. The design being presented to the Commission (See Attachment A, B, C) includes: four decks ranging from 3 feet to 6 feet high; a climbing wall; cyclone and mogul slides; a suspension bridge; Cargo, trap door, and cliff climbers; and a number of above ground and ground level panels. The Committee's selection reflects its desire to retain those components that make the existing equipment special (suspension bridge and slides) while providing more challenging play opportunities. 'O ^.lulu- -._. ,'et:..: 1 1:;" - ',31,'..7? �'• :�CIe 1C Pace 2 The proposed equipment can set (two swings) . Current. set (four swings), but reguia_ ions, which require are plans to install a material in selected areas access in compliance with ( ADA ` . only accommodate a one, two -bay swing _y the park has a two, two -bay swing it no longer meets the play -zone additional space. Additionally, there pour -in -place rubberized surfacing in the playlot to provide wheelchair the Americans with Disabilities Act he colors selected by the Ad Hoc Committee consist of royal blue for major components (slides, decks, and posts) , red roofs, and yellow accents. While initially I agreed that this color combination ,'could be pleasing for children and adults alike, I would like to suggest another combination that I believe would have a wider and more long - lasting appeal: replace the proposed red roofs with green roofs, and replace the blue posts with sand posts (See Attachment D for example) . This would soften the overall look of the equipment and be easier on the eyes. The estimated cost of the proposed equipment is $25,000. Installation of the new equipment and removal of existing equipment will cost approximately $8,000. Lastly, the work associated with the ADA surface material will cost approximately $16,000. The total project is expected to cost $50,000, slightly less tnan the approved budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Ad Hoc Committee's design for the Community Center Park playground equipment. \\ MOR —PRI_SERV \home_folders \MLirdley \PARKS \Community Center Play Equipment commagd . doc: k -9: �. ; }imp aes»e�: ' ,.:: >:.: �•'u�'�i #.:4,�..<f ,}� #:c 3$ i � ::. :}A "" rl >i j ::YjY�.}:{ <''•:y :S+{7•}.,•'. . n•,fi,. tr. #:r::i;::;c:;•'f /y t { • yr 35 ; ! iffc rk{" } f :5#:•'¢ k'. f,{ i:3�ij;i>;i:..... r%<:•:,::r:; ��::: ?,r:2 ?k:; iii': ?}S :?�$#:`'i:: ? <: }.., ?: ?' : SR`<:;:;: Yii;; i:> s:;..;:.,:: �;:: lkr} }:: {:::L£•2$•rk;:;.y ?'rx,:} x:: 3#G #'{jf ;: •. yf" ....::>:.».:..... t•;:• >;;:... }>:i:$K:.. { {•;: r {cr: i. �;" :.:f•!;; +,::�t;{k.;. #. }� #yg }:• ;ai: ^Yii£: �:£r:Y` iii;'}: {" 3:4'."niiti'f.::::ir:'.'•::: %NiY /'!{{ L• }.:;.,y.{? r�j}'%:: v: $'ii {�l,.i >'�k.t:} :l{i?3 ? #i:Y., ff' • •, �{'AV• •ry f {•• r j .v isv{ i�4$: isL{ r ::•.;$�'i:• #: }i {iYti.•''::•:'i`. ��v •'• �}�^: h ? ?'�"'.r�' {f}� >•iL•iry:. • }: %:.; •/.;'!O.ri :• v l:vx i7;',�yr•. /,•J,}+y "'::.•:• ••' %•i:� /r:::' {. ri:r n . }:�..:'r..:• {�;;ris,;:''';i::. (nf +"! 7' $?. •'fi. YjYrn•:.;'rr' .....:•{........ ..of . #• i ..O L ?ti kr:. '�.. ,}v. • ;;rd. r:.y.; j; ��$:, S {3f v:�f {k }r� <f d :k{A .+•. .f.� /f} }. r. j % k: 'i. {" Y,.;. ni 7'C f :}' i "" }f }fn#$fc °.::;: ».,•:: {:, ;•'i.� }�: f:: k {.?r f {..f �• } #i: #:'�� } f:r. t • : : ,:: +•• }; }: ry f ^ i .;#d• t x. ;!:? �r 7: ';"Y^:t"• i. t >L ; t> f: i,7 'X.w <}K3 r {' rf •3: Gf :: r{ f • S�'7 ,�y ;}}�aX' •K: }. r••. } ##!'x;' _ t { Y .}•:ifr: , .' { , , /•f� f . r#;.. • r,;> : ,�.•r:;:..: . �• ,}} ; •+•'•�•.••'•.'2" '9' %.i>.lr''f,� f f r � fr�'.`v ":: • '�f�'• f:f.£ti. •;L #.;. { %,hy,.:.. }}k #:k <::r�7 }� f { +:' r yaf,�y.•:,: t5 ''�y.} � # }n•.!;......': f}j•::. K. r: irf }�'�; }{: y ::•. {n•: y: }:: y;•..; i. �K fd f{ { { f:: v:n /.; :n,.: ;:•fr r jf { } • S /.f•}�r. r ; ; 6 y� f f rf.•.;/ ., { }. >: },.::';,�+'{; "Sw',•'•ki •v }{ t, +c,+f.'••'{";;::k:: #y:�.' ", . � ff.: ,a,�niyy},"•,. r• {:�}�/'{��'•9{8/•';:%"'H/ { f �c" �f ��f rk{ f'ik < °3�•?'"r:; {c: :f �"f F:f3'�i �.'•+ •'i: 'i K. �"% a� f,:{ � /�,�{ {yf%� "�f <J7 ;if, bf�¢J*: 4t 7i+�f rf^ ?��• r�r �"•i 4l'rS'{i''fF• ,# i. �,,'��•;: ,••. $••:.: ;,.r k,•�t'} }f f f �. - r; {., :: :' !' t�,r + #.; k }: {i rr{vf o .,: }::t•'i. fKhi ,% /k :>::: :.:.:::.. ;:•:::•7: is Y: ii:::� .::;•77ii : - :. .........:"}}:•:: ii: i}: i. �.: :. u:.: �: ..; ::::<..: �. �::. �.< {:.::::i::• }a.::.i: ".; ":: iiiiii Y:t {t•; +r::: • "iY>a :; ... .._. #l}} vt { r f :? {ir :..::.rr{•{rr:::x k -9: �. ; }imp aes»e�: ' ,.:: >:.: �•'u�'�i #.:4,�..<f ,}� #:c 3$ i � ::. :}A "" rl >i j ::YjY�.}:{ <''•:y :S+{7•}.,•'. . n•,fi,. tr. #:r::i;::;c:;•'f /y t { • yr 35 ; ! iffc rk{" } f :5#:•'¢ k'. f,{ i:3�ij;i>;i:..... r%<:•:,::r:; ��::: ?,r:2 ?k:; iii': ?}S :?�$#:`'i:: ? <: }.., ?: ?' : SR`<:;:;: Yii;; i:> s:;..;:.,:: �;:: lkr} }:: {:::L£•2$•rk;:;.y ?'rx,:} x:: 3#G #'{jf ;: •. yf" ....::>:.».:..... t•;:• >;;:... }>:i:$K:.. { {•;: r {cr: i. �;" :.:f•!;; +,::�t;{k.;. #. }� #yg }:• ;ai: ^Yii£: �:£r:Y` iii;'}: {" 3:4'."niiti'f.::::ir:'.'•::: %NiY /'!{{ L• }.:;.,y.{? r�j}'%:: v: $'ii {�l,.i >'�k.t:} :l{i?3 ? #i:Y., ff' • •, �{'AV• •ry f {•• r j .v isv{ i�4$: isL{ r ::•.;$�'i:• #: }i {iYti.•''::•:'i`. ��v •'• �}�^: h ? ?'�"'.r�' {f}� >•iL•iry:. • }: %:.; •/.;'!O.ri :• v l:vx i7;',�yr•. /,•J,}+y "'::.•:• ••' %•i:� /r:::' {. ri:r n . }:�..:'r..:• {�;;ris,;:''';i::. (nf +"! 7' $?. •'fi. YjYrn•:.;'rr' .....:•{........ ..of . #• i ..O L ?ti kr:. '�.. ,}v. • ;;rd. r:.y.; j; ��$:, S {3f v:�f {k }r� <f d :k{A .+•. .f.� /f} }. r. j % k: 'i. {" Y,.;. ni 7'C f :}' i "" }f }fn#$fc °.::;: ».,•:: {:, ;•'i.� }�: f:: k {.?r f {..f �• } #i: #:'�� } f:r. t • : : ,:: +•• }; }: ry f ^ i .;#d• t x. ;!:? �r 7: ';"Y^:t"• i. t >L ; t> f: i,7 'X.w <}K3 r {' rf •3: Gf :: r{ f • S�'7 ,�y ;}}�aX' •K: }. r••. } ##!'x;' _ t { Y .}•:ifr: , .' { , , /•f� f . r#;.. • r,;> : ,�.•r:;:..: . �• ,}} ; •+•'•�•.••'•.'2" '9' %.i>.lr''f,� f f r � fr�'.`v ":: • '�f�'• f:f.£ti. •;L #.;. { %,hy,.:.. }}k #:k <::r�7 }� f { +:' r yaf,�y.•:,: t5 ''�y.} � # }n•.!;......': f}j•::. K. r: irf }�'�; }{: y ::•. {n•: y: }:: y;•..; i. �K fd f{ { { f:: v:n /.; :n,.: ;:•fr r jf { } • S /.f•}�r. r ; ; 6 y� f f rf.•.;/ ., { }. >: },.::';,�+'{; "Sw',•'•ki •v }{ t, +c,+f.'••'{";;::k:: #y:�.' ", . � ff.: ,a,�niyy},"•,. r• {:�}�/'{��'•9{8/•';:%"'H/ { f �c" �f ��f rk{ f'ik < °3�•?'"r:; {c: :f �"f F:f3'�i �.'•+ •'i: 'i K. �"% a� f,:{ � /�,�{ {yf%� "�f <J7 ;if, bf�¢J*: 4t 7i+�f rf^ ?��• r�r �"•i 4l'rS'{i''fF• ,# i. �,,'��•;: ,••. $••:.: ;,.r k,•�t'} }f f f �. - r; {., :: :' !' t�,r + #.; k }: {i rr{vf o .,: }::t•'i. fKhi ,% /k :>::: :.:.:::.. ;:•:::•7: is Y: ii:::� .::;•77ii : - :. .........:"}}:•:: ii: i}: i. �.: :. u:.: �: ..; ::::<..: �. �::. �.< {:.::::i::• }a.::.i: ".; ":: iiiiii Y:t {t•; +r::: • "iY>a :; ... .._. MOGUL SLJOE 714-726-5 714 -552 714 -552 VIEW GROOVE TRAP DOOR CLIMBER ADA STEPS 2' RISE PANEL SUSPENSION 714 -9p59� 714 -716 BRIDGE 714 -855 CARGO CLIMBER O CLIMBER �'f1EV714f4B" 714-996 PILOT PANEL {BELOW DECK) K ? a STEPS 1' -6" RISE 4-- w ,�� to SLANTED CLIMBING WALL STORE FRONT PANEL DOOR PANEL I 0 n Co 714- 757 -26 (BELOW DECK) WALL W/ (BELOW DECK) � x x 714-713-58 v►�� .� WHEEL N /tom 3 414 a CLIFF CUMBER 714 -719 JUMP PANEL CLIMBING POLE 3' DECK PUPPET STAGE 714 -808 714 -715 -3 (BELOW DECK) 360' CYCLONE SUDS 714- 886- -1 1 1 ri A CITY OF MOORPARK - COMMUNITY CENTER PARK MOORPARK, CA A �l m ptl�L 19CERRID THE PLAY COWONENTS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLAN ARE IPEMA CERTHMTf :D. THE USE AND LAYOUT OF THESE COMPONENTS CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS CIF ASTM F1487. AN ENERGY ABSORBING PROTECTIVE SURFACE IS REQUIRED U DER A AROUND ALL PLAY SYSTEMS. STEPS 1' -8' RISE 714 -897 9L -CSC -1• IL TNM 0NIeMn3 PILOT PANEL 1N 03V15 W/WINDOW VIEW GROOVE (BELOW DECK) �° e 8 PANEL 714- 714-BB e 714 -718 g n 6pEge� q� 714 -502 7/4502 0n I 4 CLIMBING POLE 714 -882 -4 714 -808 714 -862 -4 PERT STEEL PERF STEEL SQUARE ROOF SQUARE ROOF i (BELOWD°CK5 714 - 714 -48 u v0 t N 714 -882 -4 �Nb PERF STEEL t SQUARE ROOF 008 -4IL '.IQ 13314% O w /% T1VM ♦OS -i1L i MOM Irk 3' TRANSFER POINT W\SINGLE STEP 714 -965 0 SAFETY PANEL 998 MIRACLE pECRP n0N BQUMff COMPANY CD71151 ✓ COMPLIES TO CPSC "L'iecis _ SCALE: 1/8 „ -1 ,- 0 „ 5 -12 GROUND SPACE: 47' X 34' COMPLIES TO ASTM �ort�oeuianrxnm�sa.ACCMU” rtmu N== "ADA mwtiv DATE: 7/16/01 � PROTECTIVE AREA: 61'X 47' �/ COMPLIES TO ADA TYPE: QUA!nM: 0 0 CONNIE MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services/4' DATE: August 24, (Meeting of September 4, 2001) SUBJECT: Park Bond Status Report BACKGROUND The purpose of this report is to update the Parks and Recreation Commission on the status of the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Proposition 12). 'this Proposition received approval by California voters on March 7, 2000. It has a number of provisions that provide funding to local governments to develop, improve, and maintain parks. Of significance to Moorpark is the Roberti- Z'Berg- Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Grant and two Block Grants. Funds from these three grants will be distributed on a per capita basis. It is expec�ed that they will generate approximately $353,000 for the City of Moorpark to be used on park projects: 1. Roberti- Z'Berg- Harris Grant (Block Grant) $ 84,000 2. Per Capita Grant I - Statewide: $191,000 3. Per Capita Grant II - Small Cities: $78,C00 Important facts about the grants funds include: • Grantees must have fully executed contracts for their Per Capita projects by June 30, 2003 and for Block Grant projects by June 30, 2004. • Per Capita grants are for capital outlay only. With regards to the Block Grant, no more than 30% can be used for major maintenance or innovative recreation programs. The remainder must go toward capital outlay. Propos nion i< <,eporr Pam 2 • grantees may spend up tu 20:; of funds for non - cunstruct.i.on costs, including grants administration, plans, and permits. • The Per Capita Grants do not require a mater, the Block Grant requires a 30° match. in addition to the per capita grants, Proposition 12 provides for some competitive grant opportunities. ?However, most cf these grants will be awarded to iow- income communities. City SLa.ff will make every effort to seek these grants out and to submit potential projects when applicable. The C ty' S harks and Recreation Commission will have aI" opport',:n i.1. y to discuss proposed .uses for the 0' 353, 000 - r - o:r: a list of existing park improvement projects, as well as any new projects that may be identified as a result of public input. it is expected that the Commission wi.il forward a recommendation to the City Council by March 2002. STAFF RECODMENDATION Receive and file reporo. M. AMLind1-yVPA: KS\Pr0Pc... t: 0n 12 Sams l,epert wwagd.dw i MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services DATE: August 27, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001) SUBJECT: Consider Ad Hoc Committees for Playground Equipment BACKGROUND The City has several capital improvement projects slated for construction in FY 2001102. Among those orojects is the replacement of playground equipment at Mountain Meadows 'Dark and a new playground at Villa Campesina Park. in the past the Commission has used Ad Hoc Committees to help design playgrounds. Staff is suggesting that the Commission select two Ad Hoc Committees to develop equipment recommendations for consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Select two Ad Hoc Committees comprised of two Parks and Recreation Commissioners to develop playground design recommendations for Mountain Meadows Park and Villa Campesina Park. M:\,Ml- .indleyTARKS',Playground Ad Hoc Committees.doc MOORPARK'S PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services DATE: August 23, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001) SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Commission Park Tour BACKGROUND The Commission will tour eight to ten of the City parks for the purpose of discussing and identifying enhancements and improvements it may wish to consider. The purpose is not to identify maintenance issues. The Commission is being asked to select a date and time. Staff will publish an agenda identifying the parks on the tour and estimated arrival times for the public. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Select a date and time when Commission and staff will conduct the Fall Park Tour.