HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2001 1105 PR REGMOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA
November 5, 2001
6:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Craig Chally, Quentin
DeGuardi, Tom Pflaumer, and Chair Sandra Thompson.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Staff's Monthly Report.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes
of September 4, 2001. Staff Recommendation: Approve as
presented.
B. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission Park Tour
Minutes of October 7, 2001. Staff Recommendation: Approve
as presented.
C. Moorpark After Dark Dances Report. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file report.
D. Parks Quarterly Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and
file report.
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comment portion of the agenda. Speaker Cards must be
received by the Recording Secretary prior to the Public Comments portion of the meeting. Speakers will be heard in the order that
their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. Copies of the reports or other
written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available
for public review. Any questions concerning any Agenda item may be directed to the Community Services Department Secretary,
799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6227.
PATRICK HUNTER CUNT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS KEITH F. MILLHOUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Counciknember
Parks and Recreation Commission Agenda
November 5, 2001
Page 2
E. Recreation Programming Quarterly Report. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
F. July 3`d Fireworks Extravaganza Report. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file.
8. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Apricot Festival Status Report. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file report.
B. Moorpark Summer Camp Report. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file.
C. Consider Revising Parks Reservation Fees and Policy.
Staff Recommendation: Support staff's recommendation to
revise the Park Reservation Fees and Policy as identified
in staff's report.
D. Consider Skatepark Sites: Staff Recommendation: Identify
the two or three most desired skatepark locations.
E. Consider Park Capital Improvement Plan. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file.
F. Consider Parking Improvements at Miller Park. Staff
Recommendation: Recommend to the City Council that the
City not undertake parking modifications at Miller Park
at this time.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
10. ADJOURNMENT:
City of Moorpark )
County of Ventura ) ss.
State of California )
I, Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary of the City of
Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that I posted a copy of the
agenda for the regularly scheduled meeting of November 3, 2001.
Executed this 31st day of October, 2001, at Moorpark,
California.
Patty Lemcke
Administrative Secretary
Community Services Department
MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Moorpark, California
1. CALL TO ORDER:
September 4, 2001
Chair Thompson called the meeting to order at 6:45 p.m.
2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Pflaumer led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Craig Chally,
Quentin DeGuardi, Thomas Pflaumer, and Chair Sandra
Thompson.
Staff Present: Mary Lindley, Director of Community
Services; and Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATION, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
A. Staff's Monthly Report.
Mary Lindley gave an oral report.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
None.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes of September 4, 2001. Staff Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
B. Approval of the Minutes from the Joint Meeting of the
City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission.
Staff Recommendation: Approve as presented.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
September 4, 2001
Page 2
C. Recreation Programming Quarterly Report. Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
D. Parks Quarterly Report_._ Staff Recommendation: Receive
and file report.
MOTION: Commissioner DeGuardi moved to approve the Consent
Calendar as presented. Commissioner Catrambone
seconded. The motion was carried 5 -0.
8. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider Skatepark Options. Staff Recommendation: For
Commission to discuss Skatepark options and provide
comments.
Mary Lindley briefed the Commission on her staff
report, and reviewed the skatepark tour in June.
A video on modular skateparks was shown. Following the
video, Mary Lindley stated that two important factors
with modular skateparks are that the ramps can be
switched around for variety, and if popularity of the
sport dies, the concrete court can be used for another
sport. She also stated that because of price, if
modular were chosen, two skateparks could be
constructed.
TZere were seven public speakers.
1. Bryan Baker, 263 Sierra Avenue spoke in favor of
a concrete skatepark.
2. Alan Garcia, 15006 -A Varsity Street, spoke in
favor of the construction of two skateparks.
3. Kevin Keirstead, 13340 E. Quail Summit Road, also
spoke in favor of building two skateparks.
4. Tyler Farina, 15377 Bambi Court, also spoke in
favor of building two skateparks, one in the
College area and one in the AVCP area.
Parrs & Recreation Commission Minutes
Sep -ember 4, 2001
Page 3
5. Anna Reid, 15006 -A Varsity Street, stated that in
her opinion, two skateparks would be best because
the majority of kids would not take the City bus
to go to a skatepark. They would use a skatepark
if they could walk or skate to it.
6. Dave Keirstead, 13340 E. Quail Summit Road,
answered some of the Commissions questions
regarding the current portable skatepark at AVCP.
7. Matt Yoshiwara, 4307 Fireside Lane, stated that
he would like to see two skateparks constructed;
one concrete and one modular.
The Commission and staff discussed the information
provided by the speakers and stated their views on the
different types of skateparks and what locations they
feel would be most beneficial.
Commissioner Pflaumer
hear additional input
discussion should be
Commission agreed and
until after the par
discussed.
stated that he would like to
from the public and that further
held at another meeting. The
also felt this should be tabled
k tour when location could be
MOTION: Commissioner Pflaumer moved to table this item until
after the Park Tour. Commissioner Chally seconded it.
The motion was carried 5 -0.
B. Consider Proposed Playground Equipment for the
Community Center Park. Staff Recommendation: Approve
playground equipment for the Community Center Park
recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee.
Mary Lindley gave a brief overview of the selection of
play equipment chosen by the Ad Hoc Committee and the
color combination recommended by staff.
MOTION: Commissioner Pflaumer moved to approve the playground
equipment recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee, with
staff's recommended color combination. Commissioner
DeGuardi seconded. The motion was carried 5 -0.
Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes
Septerrber 4, 2001
?acre ]
C. Review Park Bond Information (Proposition 12). Staff
Recommendation: Receive and file report.
Mary Lindley explained the funding of the three
available grants and the guidelines of what the funds
can be used for. She asked the Commission to consider
what they would like to see for park improvements and
their suggestions would be discussed at the next
regularly scheduled meeting and upcoming park tour.
MOTION: Commissioner Chally moved to receive and file the
report. Commissioner Pflaumer seconded. The motion was
carried 5 -0.
D. Consider Ad Hoc Committees for Playground Equipment.
Staff Recommendation: Select two Ad Hoc Committees
comprised of two Parks and Recreation Commissioners to
develop playground design recommendations for Mountain
Meadows Park and Villa Campesina Park.
The Commission reached a consensus for Commissioners
Catrambone and Pflaumer to serve on the Ad Hoc
Committee for Villa Campesina Park's playground
equipment, and for Commissioners Chally and DeGuardi
to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee for Mountain Meadows
Park's playground equipment.
E. Parks and Recreation Commission's Fall Park Tour.
Staff Recommendation: Select a date and time, to
conduct the Fall Park Tour.
The Commission announced that their Fall Park Tour
will be held on Sunday, October 7, at 10:00 a.m.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS /FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Chair Thompson thanked the teens that had attended the
evening's meeting to voice their opinions on what they
would like to see built for the proposed skatepark(s).
Parks & Recreation Commission. Minutes
September 4, 2001
Page 5
10. ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Thompson adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
• t /al91F
SANDRA THOMPSON, CHAIRMAN
Respectfully submitted:
Patty Lemcke, Administrative Secretary
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING PARK TOUR
Moorpark, California
1. CALL TO ORDER:
October 7, 2001
Chair Thompson called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Commissioners Joseph Catrambone, Craig Chally, Quentin
DeGuardi, Tom Pflaumer, and Chair Sandra Thompson.
Staff present: Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services,
and Allen Walter, Supervisor of Maintenance and Operations.
3. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider Removal of Fence at Campus Canyon Park. Staff
Recommendation: Concur with staff to permanently remove
the wrought iron fence.
MOTION: Commissioner DeGuardi moved to support staff's
recommendation to permanently remove the existing wrought
iron fence along the east side of the park. Commissioner
Catrambone seconded. The morion was carried 5 -0.
B. Consider Restrictions to Parks' Amplified Sound Permits.
Staff Recommendation: Concur with staff's recommended
restrictions to the parks' amplified sound permits.
The Commission reached a consensus to table this item
until their next regularly scheduled meeting of November
5, 2001.
C. Parks and Recreation Commission and City Staff to Conduct
Bi- annual Park Tour. Staff Recommendation: For Commission
to tour the following parks and provide use and
improvement comments.
1. Poindexter Park: 1C:10 am
2. Villa Campesina Park: 10:30 am
3. Glenwood Park: 10:50 am
Pa r. k 'TIou r-. Agenda
October 7, 2001
P a o e 2
4. AVCP: ?.?:20 am
5. Tierra Rejada Park: 11 :45 am
6. Monte Vista Park: 12:00 pm
?. Miller Park: 12:30 pm
B. Griffin Park: 12:50 pm
9. Campus Park: 1:10 pm
10. Campus Canyon Park: 1:30 pm
The Commission discussed tl-ie following items: The completion.
of AVCP Phase II; possible locations for a skatepark(s) ;
future replacement of the playground equipment at Tierra
Rejada Park; basketball courl�- lighting at Glenwood, Miller,
Campus Canyon, and Tierra Rejada narks; possible sand
volleyball courts at Tierra Rejada and Griffin parks;
f=easibility of expa::di.ng Poindexter and Glenwood parks; and
soccer field lighting at Miller and Arroyo Vista parks.
4. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 2:25 p.m.
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Parks & Recreation Commission
FROM: Rachele Loosbrock, Teen Coordinator
DATE: October 31, 2001
SUBJECT: Moorpark After Dark Dance
n n rTCr_'0 nTTt%M
After one successful year of the After Dark dances, the first dance of
the 2001/2002 school term saw the highest attendance at any After Dark
dance, with a record turn out of 862 teens. The new year faces new
challenges after this dance attracted 862 teens to the event.
nTCrTTCCTnAT
The After Dark "Back to School" event, the first dance of the new
school term, was held on Friday, September 21, 2001, from 7:00 to
10:00 p.m. The dance included a deejay, climbing wall, Sumo Wrestling,
snack shack, open gym, and the Teen Council cotton candy and glow
necklaces booth. The dance was located in the Multi- Purpose Room; the
climbing wall was located on the walkway to the east of the building;
and the sumo wrestling, games and sports were all held inside the
gymnasium.
Admission for the event was raised from $4 to $5, which sped up the
admission process by eliminating the distribution of change. To be
admitted, each teen must present school identification. Paid
registration included three attraction tickets and an admission
wristband. Free passes were sent to Catholic Charities and distributed
at the prior dance as raffle items. Fourteen of these passes were
submitted for free entrance into the dance. There were no security
incidents during the day, and one injury requiring a paramedic.
Direct event expenditures totaled $1,434.11, with part -time staff
costs of $661.05. Revenue from the event totaled $4,698.70. A detail
sheet is attached.
NI: \PLemckc\M \('omnussion \Alter Dark Report.doc
This event/ Was successful, and n e Croy received positive feed bacr,
from We teens.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission receive and file this report.
M Dark Rcpoit.doc
Moorpark After Dark
BUDGET DETAIL
EVENT EXPENDITURES
Special Attractions
Deejay
Concessions
Pizza
Light Tower
Prizes
Total Expenditure
EVENT REVENUE
Donations
Admission
Glow Necklaces
Concessions
Total Revenue
PIT STAFF COSTS
NET EXPENDITURE
'Does not include full time staff costs.
W111,emcke'.WC ommission'Atter Lark Report.doc
SEPTEMBER 2001
$425.00
$325.00
$299.11
$240.00
$105.00
$40.00
$1,434.11
AMOUNT
$0
$4,240
$250.00
$208.70
$4,698.70
$661.05
$3,264.59"
U..��.....- _.
AGENDA REPORT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services
Prepared By: Allen Walter, Supervisor of Maintenance and
Operations
DATE: October 19, 2001 (Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Parks Quarterly Report
July through September 2001
AVCP: The irrigation well malfunctioned and required
repair. Only one day of watering was lost.
Park staff added additional cement sidewalk area at the
storeroom and at the monument sign.
Well #2 (wood structure) was vandalized again and was
repaired by staff.
Park staff and Sunridge jointly prepared AVCP for the 3rd of
July celebration. Projects included painting, weed
abatement, re- grading, adding chips to the planters, and
general clean up of the undeveloped areas.
The roller hockey storage bin door has rusted to the point
that it will have to be replaced. Staff is in the process
of securing a new rental bin.
Security lights were repaired at all walkways and all are
now operational.
The well pump's main connection failed and flooded the
football field in August. Park staff repaired, and the
system was back in service the same day.
Staff is currently working on a report reflecting the use
of the tennis court lights; the cost to operate, and
revenue received.
Page 1
Ni \PLemcke \M \('ommission\Agenda Report -Parks Quart.doc
A water line was damaged when a truck ran over a quick
coupler during the set up for the Labor Day Event. Tt was
repaired, and turf damage from the even* caused by the }igh
amount of activity, has returned to normal health.
lei is Court "Next Player" signs were installed.
might new soccer goals were delivered and assembled a[
AVCP. These new goals are being used during the current
AYSO season. AYSO contributed $3,500 towards the cost of
t'ne goals.
Pepper trees along the east perimeter were lifted (trimmed)
by staff and t ^e removed limbs were chipped. The lifting
will ;
Villa Campesina Park: Security lights were repaired and
they are all now operational.
Country Trail Park: Turf damage, caused by a soccer club
using the park on weekends without a permit, has been
corrected. The players had worn the turf and burned lines
into it.
Park staff replaced and secured a concrete table that had
been removed by vandals.
Monte Vista Park: Park staff and Sunridge jointly completed
a major clean up of park trees, ground cover, and brush.
Mountain Meadows Park: A hazardous low area behind the
ballfield bleacher was back filled.
Poindexter Park: Two new park gazebos have been designed
and are on order. They will be constructed of metal,
helping to eliminate most of the vandalism experienced with
the wood ones.
A light pole by the entry to the park was damaged by
construction at Gieslier Field. The contractor will repair
or replace.
Campus Canyon Park: There are a number of bare turf areas
resulting from soccer play. At the end of the season the
turf will be reseeded. Staff removed the wrought iron fence
on the east -side of the park. A bid to cut the block posts
and cap were received.
All Parks: Staff prepared a water audit report, which
identifies the actual water usage in each park verses the
actual need. We have found that the allocation identified
by Ventura County Water Works District I for park spaces
differs from the allocation the City needs to keep its high
use park areas green. When the City exceeds its allocation,
the cost per gallon increases significantly. City staff
will be scheduling a meeting with Water Works to discuss
increased water allocations.
New playground rules signs will soon be ordered that will
be color coordinated to match the playground equipment. The
signs will be consistent with the new playground safety
guidelines and will indicate the age appropriateness of the
equipment.
Page 3
ki T Let ckc \M \Commission \Agenda Report -Parks Quart doc
Backflow inspection: was completed at all parks.
)esign of the parks' monument signs is i r. progress. Wr:en
,he project is complete it will be presented to the P &R
Commissio� for recommendan ion.
`'he City Risk Management Evaluation report was reviewed and
the following minor repairs were completed:
• Miller Park benches contained an entrapment area
between seat and back support that was corrected. AVCP
benches by the playground are similar in design and
were checked. They also were modified.
• Tree branches at the playgrounds were trimmed to
accommodate the 7 ft clearance regulation.
• Fibar and /or sand were added to the parks' playgrounds
to meet ADA standards.
Page 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steven Kueny, City Manager
FROM: Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendent
DATE: October 10, 2001
SUBJECT: Quarterly Report on Recreation Programming
Summer Quarter: July — September 2001
This memo serves as a review and analysis of summer 2001 Recreation division programs. This
report also reflects staff's efforts to identify direct costs for each program. Direct costs are all
costs for a program with the exception of staff time. Part time staff costs are included in the total
cost for each program. Coordinator and Superintendent hours are indicated at the end of each
program section.
SUMMER EVENTS
3" of .Iuly Fireworks Extravaganza
The 3 d of July Fireworks event was held on Tuesday, July 3, 2001 from 4:00 to 9:30 p.ln. at the
Arroyo Vista Community Park. This event featured live entertainment, food vendors, souvenir
vendors, the Red Wagon Parade, games and attractions, and an aerial fireworks display. An
admission fee of $1.00 was charged to the public. Event costs remained relatively consistent with
last year. Revenue decreased dramatically, due to the loss of several large donations.
Fireworks
2001
2000 1999
1998
Participants
8,000
8,000 Not Offered
10,000
Volunteers
30
30
30
Direct Costs
$20,349
$21,840
$11,638
Part Time Staff Costs
$1,500
$950
$365
Total Costs
$21,849
$22,790
$12,003
Donations
$14,250
$33,750
Admission Revenue
$5,502
$5,231
Total Revenue
$21,516
$40,456
$5,700
Net Revenue
-$333
$17,666
- $6,303
Direct Cost Per Participant
$2.54
$2.73
$1.16
Total Cost Per Participant
$2.73
$2.84
$1.20
Revenue Per Participant
$2.68
$5.06
$0.57
Net Revenue Per Participant
-$0.04
$2.21
-$0.63
Coordinator Hours
200
180
80
Superintendent Hours
80
100
Sr. Management Analysts
60
Concert in the Park Series
the concert series was discontinued in 2001.
July 30 Concert
2001
2000
Participants
Not Offered
700
Volunteers
$9,878
0
Direct Costs
$4,464
Part Time Staff Costs
$190
Total Costs
$4,654
Total Revenue
So
Net Cost
$4,464
Direct Cost Per Participant
$6.38
Total Cast Per Participant
$6.65
Revenue Per Participant
So
Net Cost Per Participant
O.65
Coordinator Hours
40
Superintendent Hours
20
August 27 Concert
2001
2000
Participants
N/A
200
Volunteers
0
Direct Costs
$5669
Part Time Staff Costs
$307
Total Costs
$5976
Total Revenue
$163
Net Cost
$5813
Direct Cost Per Participant
S28.35
7'otal Cost Per Participant
$29.88
Ret•enue Per Participant
$0.82
Net Cost Per Participant
S29.07
Coordinator Hours
60
Superintendent Hours
40
Apricot Festival
1999 1998
Not Offered Not Offered
1999 1998
Not Offered Not Offered
In lieu of the summer concerts series, City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission
recommended one larger scale event. The Apricot Festival was held on Labor Day, Monday,
September 3, 2001. The event ran from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Arroyo Vista Community Park
and featured a carnival midway, live entertainment, a craft show, and a food court.
July 30 Concert
2001 2000
Participants
3000 Not Offered
Volunteers
10
Direct Costs
$9,878
Part Time Staff Costs
$634
('.`•% VINNI "TionlesA'I.emcke %Iempotwy Internet hlcs',tri_K29',Summc, 2001 ()uartcrl% dtW
Total Costs S10,512
Total Revenue $2,630
Net Cost $7,882
Direct Cost Per Participant
$3.29
"Total Cost Per Participant
$3.50
Revenue Per Participant
$0.88
Net Cost Per Participant
$2.63
Coordinator Hours
120
Superintendent Hours
60
SUMMER DAY CAMP
Summer Day Camp continues to produce consistent revenue for the City of Moorpark. Although the
total number of participants registered in the program fell slightly, average daily attendance
remained consistent. Revenue increased slightly due to a minimal increase in registration fees. The
three senior counselors managed the program effectively, resulting in fewer hours dedicated to the
program by full -time staff.
Summer Camp
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
Participants
235
250
211
233
325
Average Per Day
83
83
86
68
80
Direct Costs
$18,587
$16,211
$11,137
$17,970
$18,618
Part Time Staff Costs
$38,304
$39,728
$36,915
$35,986
$35,523
Total Costs
$56,891
$55,939
$48.052
$53,956
$54,141
Gross Revenue
$100,285
$96,591
$99,351
$84,401
$82,489
Net Revenue
$43,394
$40,652
$51,299
$30,445
$28,348
Direct Cost Per Participant
$79.09
$64.84
$52.78
$77.12
857.28
Total Cost Per Participant
$242.08
$223.76
$227.73
$231.57
$166.58
Grass Reiv7zuePerP=gi xmt
$426.74
$386.36
$470.86
$362.23
$253.81
NetRaLmePerPcPPcVvv
$184.65
$162.61
$243.12
$130.66
$87.22
ComdirratorHotus(apptux)
100
120
300
150
52
SuperintendentHotus(appcox.)
60
160
25
125
48
SUMMER CLASSES
The class cancellation rate increased, primarily due to the loss of several contract instructors.
Despite the increased percentage of cancellations, net revenue for these programs remained
consistent.
Recreational Classes
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
Students
539
550
647
510
393
Classes Offered
100
81
84
70
65
Ran
75
66
75
55
Canceled
25 (25 %)
15 (18.5 %)
9(10.7%)
8(11.4%)
10(15%)
C:`,WINNT \Profiles \Pt.emcke \Temporary Internet Files \OIX29 \Summer 2001 QLIaIterly duc
Gross Revenue
$34,661
$31,691
$26,674
$18,220
Instructor payments
$16,719
$14,841
514,392
$9,781
Supplies
$0
$0
$0
$0
Refunds and credits
$7,934
56,122
$3041
$1,900
Net Revenue
$10,008
$10,728
$9,241
$6,539
I)ircct Uwt Per Participant
53/_02
52698
S 2 24
x19.17
Ciruss Revenue Per PartieipantS64. 31
S57.02
S41.22
535. 7.,
Net Reti-enue l'cr Participant
518.57
$19.51
514.28
512.82
Coordinator Hours
40
40
35
40
SUMMER ADULT LEAGUES
The adult sports program remained steady over the past season. Summer softball season
included some savings by recycling of plaques and lower award costs. The summer basketball
season was shortened this summer, as teams played eight (7) games and included playoffs. The
fee was prorated to make up for the shortened season. The adult program continues to generate
steady revenue for the adult sports program.
Softball
2001
2000
1999
1998
Number of Teams
32
31
36
36
Supply Costs
$3,049
$3,249
$3,208
$2,884
Facility Costs ( Lights)
S1,021
S1,435
S1,624
S1,588
Direct Costs
$4,070
$4,684
$4,832
$4,472
Part Time Staff Costs
S1,239
$1,224
$1,562
S 1,215
"Total Costs
$5,309
$5,908
$6,394
$5,687
Gross Revenue
$11,798
$11,051
$12,672
$12,879
Net Revenue
$6,489
$5,143
$6,278
$7,191
Direct Cost Per Team
x127.19
5151.97
5134.22
S124-22
Total Cost Per Team
5165.91
$190.58
$177.61
5157.97
Gross Revenue Per Team
$347.00
$356.48
$352
15357.75
Net Rcrcrtue Per Team
;S202.78
5165.90
5174.39
5199.75
Coordinator Hours
60
50
50
50
Basketball
2001
2000
1999
1998
Teams
10
9
10
16
Supply Costs
5271
5446
$547
$595
Facility Costs (S12/hour)
$528
5600
S 1,080
S1,440
Direct Costs
$799
$1,061
$1,647
$2,058
Part Time Staff Costs
$836
$850
$1,250
51,875
Total Costs
$1635
$1,911
$2,897
$3,933
Gross Revenue
$2500
$2,200
$3,145
$5,162
Net Revenue
$865
$289
$248
$1,229
le.`PLcmcke•icmporary Internet Files .0I.K29`Surnme: 2001 QL.amo; ;inc
Direct Cost Per Team
$79.90
$117.89
x164.70
$128.62
Totat Cost Per Team
$163.50
$212.33
$289.70
$245.81
Gross Revenue Per Team
$250.00
$244.44
$314.50
$322.62
Net Revenue Per Team
86.50
$32.11
$24.80
$'76.81
Coordinator Hours
20
20
20
24
Volleyball
2001
2000
1999
1998
Part Time Staff Costs ($9.50 /hr)
Cancelled
Not offered
Canceled
Canceled
Coordinator Hours
3
5
3
$3,114
Women's Instructional
2001
2000
1999
1998
Softball League
$777
$61
$227
$450
Participants
28
40
52
48
Supply Costs
$445
$446
$501
$390
Facility Costs (Lights)
$132
$126
$4.70
$147
Direct Costs
$577
$572
$506
$537
Part Time Staff Costs
$63
$68
$69
$87
Total Costs
$640
$640
$575
$624
Gross Revenue
$1,092
$1,160
$1,501
$1,200
Net Revenue
$452
$520
$926
$576
Direct Cost Per Participant
$20.60
$14.30
x'+9.73
$11.18
Total Cost Per Participant
$22.85
$16.00
$11.06
$13.00
Gross Revenue Per Participant$39.00
$128.89
$28.87
$25.00
Net Revenue Per Participant
$16.14
$13.00
$17.81
$12.01
Coordinator Hours
8
10
10
16
Superintendent Hours
4
SUMMER YOUTH LEAGUES
Youth sports experienced an increase in participation from the previous summer. Supply costs
for Rookie Basketball League were increased due to the purchase of a new scoreboard control
panel. Supply costs increased in the upper JBL league due to the use of a second official during
games. The T -Ball league was cancelled due to low enrollment. Staff is working on a plan to
increase participation in this program.
Junior Basketball League
2001
2000
1999
1998
Participants
64
40
68
81
Supply Costs
$992
$989
$1,698
$1,847
Facility Costs (Lights$.56 /hr)
$45
$30
$36
$16
Facility Costs (Gym S 12/hour)
$960
$500
$960
$960
Direct Costs
$2,247
$1,519
$2,694
$2,823
Part Time Staff Costs ($9.50 /hr)
$304
$300
$275
$291
Total Costs
$2,551
$1,819
$2,969
$3,114
Gross Revenue
$3,328
$1,880
$3,196
$3,564
Net Revenue
$777
$61
$227
$450
U \WINNT\Prottles \PLemcke I'emporary Internet Fi1es \0LK29'Summer 2001 Quaac ly.doc
Direct Cost Per Participant
$35-11
$37.98
S39.62
534.85
Total Cost Pcr Participant
539.86
545.48
543.66
538.44
Goss Revenue Per Participant
552.00
$47.00
547.00
JS44.00
;Vet Revenue Per Participant
$12.14
$1.53
53.34
$5.55
Coordinator Hours
30
20
20
25
JBL Upper Division
2001
2000
1999
1998
Participants
58
40
50
41
Supply Costs
S1,495
S 1,359
S1,249
$912
Facility Costs (Lights $.56 /hr)
$45
$35
$27
S8
Facility Costs (Gym $12 /hour)
$960
$600
$720
$480
Direct Costs
$2,500
$1,994
$1,996
$1,400
Part Time Staff Costs ($9.50 /hr)
5266
5340
$221
$143
Total Costs
$2,766
$2,334
$2,217
$1,543
Gross Revenue
$3,016
$2,028
$2,600
$1,927
Net Revenue
$250
-$306
$383
$384
Direct Cost Per Participant
513.10
549.85
x39.92
$34.14
'Total Cost Pet- Participant
547. <9
558.37
x44.34
$37.63
Gross Revenue Per Participant
S52.00
S52. 00
55 2.00
547.00
Net Revenue Per Participant
$4.31
-$7.65
$7.66
$9.36
Coordinator Hours
30
25
25
25
T -Ball League
2001
2000
1999
1998
Participants
Cancelled
20
16
23
Direct Costs
S661
$364
5679
Part Time Staff Costs
$85
$70
S69
Total Costs
$746
$434
$748
Gross Revenue
$940
$704
51,012
Net Revenue
$194
$270
$263
Direct Cost Per Participant
x33.05
$22.75
529.52
Total Cost Per Participant
$37.30
527.13
$32.52
Gross Revenue Per Participant
$47.00
;x'44
$44.00
Net Revenue Per Participant
59.70
$16.48
+11.43
Coordinator Hours
3
I5
15
15
C AV INNI'ProtiIcs i.ennke '' Icmporary Internet F' Ou:utcI!ti i,
TEEN PROGRAMS
"Peen programming remained steady in its monthly programming, but no special activities were
offered during the summer quarter due to drop off in participation because of the summer break.
Activities, including, monthly After Dark dances, Band Jalns, and Skatepark were offered during
the quarter. The new members of the Teen Council met for their first meeting on August 30,
2001. For the summer quarter, 2,193 teens participated in teen activities.
Staff Hours
Teen Programming:
After Dark: Three teen dances were held on July 20 and September 21 at the Arroyo Vista
Recreation Center and August 17 at the Boys & Girls Club. Event attendance remained high
during summer and the new school year has seen a dramatic increase in attendance. The July 20
dance had 419 teens attend, the August 17 dance had 400 teens, and the September 21 had a
record turnout of 862 teens in attendance.
Band Jams: Band Jam was held on September 28. Three local bands performed live on stage in
front of an audience of 125 high school aged teens.
Skatepark: The Skatepark continued to see steady participation over the summer quarter with
approximately 358 participants using the Skatepark on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Although, the
summer months saw a slight drop off in participants due to summer break and strict enforcement
of Skatepark rules and regulations (i.e. elbow and kneepads). Contests were held July 11,
August 8, and September 12 where approximately 29 teens participated. Prizes were awarded to
the winners.
!Moorpark After Dark
Event Dates
2001
2000
1999
1998
Part Time Staff Hours
332
$1434.11
$1152.33
Part Time Staff Hours
Teen Coordinator
503.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
Recreation Coordinator
20
100
89
75
Superintendent
60
30
65
50
Overall Attendance
2001
Total Cost Per Participant
$2.43
$4.30
Teen Programs
2,193
Teen Programming:
After Dark: Three teen dances were held on July 20 and September 21 at the Arroyo Vista
Recreation Center and August 17 at the Boys & Girls Club. Event attendance remained high
during summer and the new school year has seen a dramatic increase in attendance. The July 20
dance had 419 teens attend, the August 17 dance had 400 teens, and the September 21 had a
record turnout of 862 teens in attendance.
Band Jams: Band Jam was held on September 28. Three local bands performed live on stage in
front of an audience of 125 high school aged teens.
Skatepark: The Skatepark continued to see steady participation over the summer quarter with
approximately 358 participants using the Skatepark on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Although, the
summer months saw a slight drop off in participants due to summer break and strict enforcement
of Skatepark rules and regulations (i.e. elbow and kneepads). Contests were held July 11,
August 8, and September 12 where approximately 29 teens participated. Prizes were awarded to
the winners.
!Moorpark After Dark
Event Dates
Sept. 2001
July 2001
Participants
862
419
Direct Costs
$1434.11
$1152.33
Part Time Staff Hours
56.5
60.75
Part Time Staff Costs
$661.05
650.86
Total Costs
$2095.16
$1803.19
Gross Revenue
$4698.70
$1764.15
Net Revenue
$2603.54
$39.04
Direct Cost Per Participant
$1.66
$2.75
Total Cost Per Participant
$2.43
$4.30
C:\ WINN '5Protiles \PLemcke \'retnporary Internet Files \01,K29 \Summer 3001 Quarterly floc
Gross Revenue Per Participant
$5.45
$4.21
,,Vc t Revenue Per Participant
S3.0-2
$0.09
Teen Coordinator Hours
25
25
Recreation Coordinator Hours
2
1
Superintendent Hours
6
5
Band Jam
2001
$876.55
Event Dates (9/28)
$5,578.66
$4,521.08
Participants
125
$2575.30
Direct Costs
$50
$1,570
Part Time Staff Hours
19
$2070
Part Time Staff Costs
$205.63
$2,951.08
Total Costs
$255.63
$505.30
Gross Revenue
$0
Net Revenue
$- 255.63
Direct Cost Per Participant
$0.40
Total Cost Per Participant
$2.04
Gross Revenue Per Participant
$0.00
Net Revenue Per Participant
$ -2.04
Teen Coordinator Hours
12
Recreation Coordinator Hours
0
Sii1wrintendent Hours
3
BROCHURE
`File following information does not include the City Clerk's portion of the brochure costs for the
City Newsletter.
Brochure Costs
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
Printing Cost
$4293.64
$3,436.46
$3,138.95
$2,514.29
$1,698.75
Mailing Cost
$1285.02
$1,084.62
$1,091.34
$1,066.83
$876.55
Total Cost
$5,578.66
$4,521.08
$4,230.29
$3,581.12
$2575.30
Ad Revenue
$1,875
$1,570
$1,900
$1,460
$2070
Net Cost
$3,703.66
$2,951.08
$2,330.29
$2,121.12
$505.30
U %..%'FINN' I'rutiles'PI.etncke`.f'empuratq Internet Files 0I.K2O`,tiinnmur 2001 Quart cll do,
FACILITY RENTALS
Recreation Center staff continues to process park and facility rentals for City park facilities. Park
rentals over the past quarter saw a slight decrease in total number of permits, however many
permits include multiple dates for use of park facilities (i.e. Mountain Meadows ballfield field,
Miller Park ballfield, and Campus Canyon Park athletic /soccer field). This quarter reflects the
recent changes in amplified sound and picnic pavilion rental policy. Although amplified sound
and picnic pavilion rentals were restricted to, prior to 6:00 p.m., gross revenue increased. AVRC
rentals also experienced a slight increase in total permits, however multiple dates are included on
the same permit (i.e. AYSO). Part staff costs are calculated at Range /step 14F, $8.73. Costs
increased due to the increase in part time staff wages, effective July 1, 2001.
Park Rentals
2001
2000
1999
1998 1997
Pen-nits
189
181
219
279 Not avanable
Gross Revenue
$14,510
$9,030
$9,488
S10,579
Gross Revenue Per Rental
$76.77
$65.23
$50.81
$37.91
AVRC Rentals
2001
2000
1999
1998* 1997
Pen-nits
13
6
13
17 Not available
Gross Revenue
$6,796
$3,357
$2010
$6,114
Gross Revenue Per Rental
$522.77
$559.50
$154.62
$37.91
Part Time Staff Hours
56.5
46.5
60
99.5
Part Time Staff Costs
$493
$404
5521
5845.75
Total Costs
$493
$404
5521
$845.75
Gross Revenue
$21,524
$12,387
$11,498
$16,693
*(Please note: Somerset Auctions
rental in 1998, brought in
$4,000 revenue)
Net Revenue
$21,031
$11,983
$10,977
$15,847
Sta./ Cost per Rental
$37.92
$67.33
$'40.08
$49.75
Gross Revenue Per Rental
$106.55
$233.17
$210.77
$359.65
Net Revenue Per Rental
$104.11
$165.84
$170.69
$309.88
Coordinator Hours
20
40
40
30
Superintendent flours
30
10
Not available
24
C:\ WINNT1Profiles \PLemcke \'I'emporary Internet Piles \0l.K29 \Summer 2001 Quarterly (IOC
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks & Recreation Commission
V' l
FROM: Stephanie Shaw, Recreation Coordinatoi���
DATE: September 28, 2001 (Parks and Recreation Commission
Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Consider Special Event Report: 3rd of July Fireworks
BACKGROUND
For five of the past six years, the City of Moorpark has
sponsored the 3r" of July Fireworks Extravaganza. This annual
Independence Dav celebration features live entertainment,
vendors, and an aerial fireworks display.
DISCUSSION
The 2001 3r" of July Fireworks Extravaganza was held on Tuesday,
July 3, 2001 from 4:00 to 9:30 p.m. at the Arroyo Vista
Community Park. Families were invited to enjoy live
entertainment, contests, children's activities, the Red Wagon
Parade, food vendors, and the aerial fireworks display. A $1
admission fee was ciarged to the public, children under five
were admitted free of charge. As in years past, there were no
official activities or vendors at any other park site, aside
from portable toilets located at Glenwood Park.
Live entertainment was provided by the Community High School's
Pop Arts Band from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. Captain Cardiac and the
Coronaries were the feature act, performing an oldies variety
concert from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. Doc Dewberry served as Master of
Ceremonies, playing music and leading audience participation
activities before and between musical acts as well as making
announcements and introductions. This year, the presentation of
the American flag was at 6:45 p.m.
M \SShaw \M1events2W 11FWUI`fwadmin0l`,f wint)I:<pt dew
The Master. of Ceremonies conducted various contests and picnic
games. Activities .ncluded pie eating, tug -o -war, gunny sack
races, hoola hoop contests, and limbo. Various items including
red, white, and blue beach balls, Chinese yo -yos, and hats were
distributed as prizes.
This year, the
theme for the Red Wagon Parade was "America the
Beautiful." The
parade was sponsored by the Moorpark Mom's
Connection. The
Red ; dagon Parade began at 6:00 p.m. Awards for
1St, 2n", and 3`
i..:la(,e were given. The City supplied items for
the prize baskets.
The evert also
feat..red special attractions, food vendors, and
souvenir and craft
vendors. Special attractions included a
climbing wall,
'_6ur::ami slide, jolly jumps, and spin cycle.
Carnival games
:nd face painting were also available. The
attractions were
cp <.,-:ated and staffed by vendors. Minimal. fees
were charged to
t.';c public for attractions. The number of food
vendors increases
ti-.,_s year., to a total of twelve booths. Food
items sold incuie:.:
tri -tip sandwiches, coffee drinks, shave
ice, kettle _- r:l,
c -i s, ice cream, Greek food, candy, chicken,
corn on -h� ..:;
: %ughnuts, and pizza. Souvenir and craft
vendors sold it::;:s :old included glow necklaces, clothing, and
ribbon crowns.
:eve_aI items relating to the holiday were
distributed free:
-L-o '_he public. The American Legion distributed
small American
iav_, Shiloh Church distributed copies of the
Declaration of
I::deiendence, and Hometown Buffet distributed
Independence Day
c_o_ :::'ing books and crayons.
The fireworks di_spl,; was launched from the football field at
9:00 p.m. T1:e sr.o .1:7isted approximately 12 minutes, with a total
of 367 shells _,au.-ched. A musical accompaniment tape was
provided by Pyro Spectaculars. Closure of the pedestrian bridge
ran smoothly and there were no problems with the restricted
zone.
Attendance remained stable this year, with approximately 8,000
people at th- even`.. The Ventura County Sheriff's Department
provided more tha:I cequate police services, as well as several
Explorer cadets to direct parking. Volunteers from the Kiwanis
Club of Moo-par'.., Mc:�rpark Rotary, the Chamber of Commerce, the
City Council, is :C!':'', and the Teen Council assisted with
security, comJnur:_cai.ions, and admission.
Direct evert exper:d --ores decreased slightly, from $21,900 last
year to $20,349 this year. (the approved budget for this event
was $26,000) . Costs that increased this year included event
insurance, sani`,::tion, and security. The largest increase was in
M'SSha ;M\ n;,2001 _FWO) i��.:�; ❑�r:�I t-, bl• ,n Jo:
security, due to the unavailability of reserve volunteer
officers. Part time staff costs increased, from $950 last year
to $1,500 this year. Additionally, with the inclusion of full -
time staff from various City departments, indirect staffing
costs increased significantly.
Revenue from donations, admission fees, vendor fees, and T -shirt
sales totaled $21,516, down from $40,456 last year. The decrease
is primarily due to the loss of several one -time only donations.
Attached is a detailed account of all expenditures and revenue.
Major sponsors included Cardservice International, Special
Devices Incorporated, Wayne J. Sand and Gravel, Anderson
Rubbish, and A to Z Self Storage.
This event was successful, and the City received positive feed
back from the community.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission receive and file this report.
M \SSbawN\cvmts200l \f W o I' r\\,d:n: no I \IMp:O I: cpt d,x
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
CITY OF
REPORT
MOORPARK
TO: The Parks & Recreation Commission
FROM: Stephanie Shaw, Recreation Coordinator
DATE: October 10, 2001
SUBJECT: Consider Special Event Report: Apricot Festival
BACKGROUND
in 2000, the City Council approved funding for an outdoor summer
concert series. That summer, two concerts were held at the Arroyo
Vista community Park. This year, Council and the Parks and Recreation
Commission recommended condensing the concert series into one large -
scale event at the end of the summer. The event was held on Labor Day
and named the "Apricot Festival ", in reference to Moorpark's
agricultural heritage.
DISCUSSION
The Moorpark Apricot Festival was held on Monday, September 3, 2001
from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Arroyo Vista Community Park. This
family event featured a carnival midway, live entertainment, a craft
show, food vendors, and various special attractions. Admission to the
public was free, with fees charged for carnival rides and attractions.
The carnival midway was provided by Kemsley Shows. A total of nine
rides were featured, including a Ferris wheel, the Sizzler, and the
Rolo Plane. Three of the nine rides were specifically for children.
The midway also included a glass pitch and refreshment stand featuring
cotton candy, popcorn, and snow cones. Kemsley shows set up and
managed the ticket booth. Tickets were sold to the public at a rate of
$0.60 each. Rides required two to four tickets. The City received
twenty percent of the revenue collected by the carnival company.
Featured entertainment was provided by children's entertainer Joanie
Bartels from 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. and Beatles tribute Backbeat from 5:00
to 7:00 p.m. Tang Soo Do University and Dance Ten provided
entertainment earlier in the day, and trick - roping cowboy Jim Townsley
M ASShaw \M\evcnts2001 W pricot0l W Fpr01 rept.doc
strolled through the crowd from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Doc Dewberry served
as Master of Ceremonies for the event, playing music and leading
audience participation activities before and between featured acts, as
well as making announcements and introductions.
The event also featured special attractions, food vendors, and a craft
show. Special attractions included a climbing wall, tsunami slide,
jolly jumps, and spin cycle. The attraction vendors staffed and ran
the attractions and charged minimal fees to the public. In addition to
the refreshment stand managed by Kemsley shows, five food vendors
participated, selling items including kettle corn, coffee, smoothies,
pizza, chicken, and lemonade. The craft show featured thirty -four
vendors, selling a variety of items including holiday gifts and
decorations, jewelry, clothing, toys, woodcraft, books, and candles.
Event attendance was estimated to be 3,000 people throughout the day.
The Ventura County Sheriff's Department provided two officers for
security. There were no security incidents during the day, and only a
few minor injuries.
Direct event expenditures totaled $9,877.75, with part -time staff
costs of $634.00. Revenue from the carnival midway was $1534.64.
Vendor fees totaled an additional $1095.00. A detail sheet is
attached.
This event was successful, and the City received positive feed back
from the community.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission receive and file this report.
M ASShaw \M\events200I \Apricot0l \AFpr01 rept.doc
Moorpark Apricot Festival
BUDGET DETAIL
EVENT EXPENDITURES
Entertainment
Stage, Sound
Equipment, Signs, Prizes
Publicity and Promotion
Event Insurance
Security
Sanitation
Total Expenditure
EVENT REVENUE
Donations
Vendor fees
Carnival revenue
Total Revenue
PIT STAFF COSTS
NET EXPENDATURE
FULL TIME STAFF
'Does not include full time staff costs.
2001
$4,900.00
$2,637.80
$125.82
$370.33
$900.00
$687.00
$256.80
$9,877.75
AMOUNT
$0
$1,095
$1,534.64
$2,629.64
$634.00
$7,195.11'
180 hours
MASShaw\M \even1s2001\Aprico[Ol\ MUDATTACHOl.doc
2000
NIA
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Stephanie Shaw, Recreation Coordinator
DATE: October 23, 2001 (Parks & Recreation Commission
Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Summer Camp Moorpark
This report is a summary for the summer 2001 session of Camp
Moorpark. The season ran smoothly with excellent leadership for the
three senior counselors.
PROGRAM SUMMARY:
The focus of the program this year was to enhance the camp
atmosphere through increased team spirit, positive leadership, and
new activities. To manage the program, the three senior counselors
were given distinct areas of responsibility. These areas included
administrative duties and record keeping, activity planning and
supply maintenance, and general supervision. This method of program
management was effective with the assigned staff members. Camp
counselors generally performed well, and turn over was less than in
past years. Staff availability for the last week of camp continues
to be an issue, and enrollment numbers were limited accordingly.
The Counselor -in- Training program was reorganized this year, to
include both Junior Counselors (ages 12 to 14) and Counselors -in
Training (ages 14 to 16). Junior Counselors attended camp at a
reduced rate, and Counselors -in- Training served as volunteers.
Through the course of the summer, the seven participants worked a
combined total of 1,139 hours.
For the second summer, children were placed into one of four
different color teams according to age, with two counselors
managing each group. Children and counselors were consistently
assigned to the same color group in order to promote a sense of
team spirit and allow a better relationship to form between the
counselors and children. This form of team management continues to
Camp Moorpark Summary
Page 2
be effective. .'h .s year, an emphasis was placed on team spirit with
t-he dal -y awarding of spirit points, which were recorded on the
spirit chart and totaled each Friday for the spirit award. This
program is expected i=o continue and improve eac'r: season.
The daily schedule remained generally consistent with previous
summers. Before lunch, teams rotated between activity stations. The
:our stations included crafts, games, sports, and free time. After
lunch, special events, videos, and guest entertainers were
scheduled. Field trips were held on Wednesdays, and included
Fil?more and Western Railway, El Capitan Theatre, ilunt_n.gton.
Gardens, Skating Plus, Golf N Stuff, IMAX Theater, Long :each
Aq.zarium, Chuck F. Cheese's, and Movieland Wax Museum.
Approximately half of the trips scheduled were located outside of
Ventura County. Several parents and many counselors commented that
the bus rides outside of the county were too long for some of the
children. In the future, trips outside the county will be reduced.
The second annual Parent's Day was held on Thursday, July 26, 2.001
at 4:30 p.m. The portable stage was set up 'n the multipurpose room
for the event. Each team prepared and presented a variety of skits
and songs. The program lasted approximately one hour and was well
attended by parents.
ATTENDANCE AND ENROLLMENT
Camp enrollment numbers remained relatively consistent this year.
Although the total number of participants fell slightly, average
daily attendance remained the same. Attendance continues to vary
greatly from day to day. In 2000, daily attendance ranged from 61
to 105 campers. This year, the range was 60 to 103. Of the 235
oarticipants, 93 (41� >) were returning campers, with 140 new
enrollments. A survey is currently being conducted of the 155 non -
returning participants to determine why they chose not to attend
Camp Moorpark this summer. Below is a comparative summary of camp
attendance.
2001 2000 1999 1998
Total Program Participants 235 250 211 233
Average Daily Attendance 83 83 86 68
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Camp continues to be financially successful. Direct costs
increased by just under 15°, primarily due to an increase in the
number and cost of field trips and the replacement of worn camp
equipment. Staffing costs fell. slightly. Gross revenue increased,
as a result of a modest increase in camp registration fees. i!et
revenue increased modestly From last year. Following i:=
:o:r.�ara _ve summarv.
Camp Moorpark Summary
Page 3
Direct Costs:
P/T Staff Costs:
Total Expenditures:
Cross Revenue:
Net Revenue:
2001
$18,587
$38,304
$56,891
$100,285
$43, 394
STAFF RECODMENDATION:
Receive and file report.
2000
$16,211
$39,728
$55, 939
$96, 591
$40, 652
1999
$11, 137
$36, 915
$48,052
$99, 351
$51,299
1998
$17, 970
$35, 986
$53, 956
$84,401
$30, 445
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Gwen Indermill, Recreation Superintendents
DATE: October 23, 2001 (Parks & Recreation Commission
Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Consider Revising Park Reservation Fees and Policy
DISCUSSION
The City's current Park Ordinance restricts public use of the parks
between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., and park restrooms are locked at
dusk. The public can still use the parks after dusk, however, most
park amenities are without lights, and the park restrooms are not
open.
Under the current park rental policy, the public may rent most park
amenities between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or dusk, with the
exception of athletic rentals. The City allows the use of certain
athletic fields until 10:00 p.m. for organized sports.
Additionally, with a permit, amplified sound can be used in parks
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. or dusk, which ever
occurs earlier. A $100.00 security deposit is required to obtain an
amplified sound permit. Most renters requesting amplified sound
permits provide music at their event, usually consisting of a disc
jockey.
Since implementing this policy in November 2000, the City has
continued to receive complaints from residents who are impacted by
the use of amplified sound. A majority of the complaints concern
the noise level, particularly on weekend evenings.
To assist with the development of the revised amplified sound
policy, staff researched three local jurisdictions. The
recommendation from Moorpark staff is consistent with the Rancho
Simi and Pleasant Valley Park Districts policy for private rental
Park Rental Policy
Page 2
parties. Rancho Simi Park District permits amplified sound only
when played in the designated amphitheater. Pleasant Valley Park
District does not permit amplified sound for picnic rentals. Conejo
Park District authorizes the use of amplified sound, provided the
renter pays for District staff to supervise the rental. Although
this policy would provide amplified sound screening, Moorpark is
not able to provide or select from a similar pool of staff.
To address the problems experienced with park rentals, staff
proposes the following changes to the Park Rental Policy and Fee
Schedule:
1. Eliminate amplified sound permits for private park rentals,
including but not limited to, birthday parties, Baptisms, and
baby showers.
2. Restrict amplified sound permits for those events deemed to
have a community benefit at the discretion of the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Parks and Recreation Commission support staff's
recommendation to revise the Park Reservation Fees and Policy as
identified in this staff reoort.
:1: \01naermiil \ ^: \A:im'_n \Commission Reports \2001 \pavilion rental ampl :tied sound.doc
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services' k'
DATE: October 23, 2001 (Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Consider Skatepark Sites
BACKGROUND
At its September 4, 2001 meeting, the Parks and Recreation
Commission began discussing the construction of one or more
skateparks. The Agenda Report from that meeting has been
attached for information (Attachment A). The Commission also
explored the various types of skateparks; e.g., concrete and
modular ramps. Several skateboarders spoke about their
preference for a concrete skatepark and the need for two
facilities: one near the College and one west of the 23 Freeway.
This meeting followed the Commission's tour of three skateparks
in neighboring jurisdictions. All three skateparks visited by
the Commission were concrete facilities.
On October 7, the Commission conducted its bi- annual tour of
City parks. An objective of this past tour was the
identification of potential skatepark sites.
When considering potential skatepark locations, the Commission
needs to take into account available space for a facility,
potential parking, restrooms, proximity to residential areas,
and site constraints (drainage and other topographical issues) .
Additionally, there are some considerations which, while not
mandatory, may be desirable, such as visibility of the location
from the street for security; access to a pay phone; and easy
travel access by walking, biking, or skateboarding. In
consideration of the aforementioned parameters and based on
input from the Commission, the following park sites are
suggested for consideration:
Skatepark Site Locations
Page 2
Arroyo Vista Community Park - There are three potential
skatepark site locations at this park: the multi purpose
court; the apricot grove; and the eastern, undeveloped end
of the park.
Griffin _Park - There are two potential locations for a
skatepark: the area adjacent to the 118 Freeway; and an
area in the northern section of the park, closer to Campus
Park Drive.
Tierra Rejada Park - The site possibilities here include:
converting one tennis court into a skatepark; using the
area east of the third tennis court; site a skatepark west
of the basketball court. The site locations at this park
are close to residences.
The remaining City parks have not been identified for
consideration for the following reasons:
• While Glenwood Park has potential space to site a
skatepark, it is not considered a good location because
it does not have a restroom facility.
• Country Trail Park is not a good location; it does not
have a restroom facility and lies within a flood basin.
• Currently, Poindexter Park does not have the appropriate
space to locate a skatepark. If in the future, the City
acquires the property along Poindexter Avenue, this park
may be a potential skatepark site.
• Miller Park has no available space to accommodate a
skatepark without impacting existing amenities.
• The only available space at Peach Hill Park is currently
used for soccer, and a skatepark in this location would
impact the residents adjacent to the north end of the
park.
• Due to the lack of space and surrounding residents,
Mountain Meadows Park is not a desirable location for a
skatepark.
• While Campus Canyon Park has potential because of its
distance from residents, it lacks available space.
However, one consideration would be to replace the
existing baseball field at the southeast corner of the
park. This move may encounter significant resistance.
M: \M Lind ley\ PARKS \skatepaik site commagd.doc
Skatepark Site Locations
Page 3
• Campus Park
accommodate a
remaining free
residences.
• Virginia Colony
restrooms.
does not have appropriate space to
skatepark without eliminating any
open turf area. It is also very close of
and Villa Campesina Parks lack space and
The Commission has two central decisions it needs to make in
forming its recommendation to the City Council. It needs to
decide an appropriate location for one or more skatepark and it
needs to decide whether the skatepark should be concrete,
modular, or a combination thereof.
It is suggested that the Commission focus its discussion on
potential skatepark locations for the November 5 meeting. It
would be helpful if the Commission could identify its two or
three top site choices. I will then identify any additional site
information needed to narrow the selection process down and
return to the Commission with additional information for its
final recommendation.
I have been gathering additional information on modular
skateparks and plan to have ramps available for inspection at
the Commission's next meeting. At that meeting, the Commission
can focus on what type of facility to construct.
I have also been talking to the City of South Pasadena. That
City's Park and Recreation Commission recently went from
designing a concrete skatepark to now considering a modular
facility. In June, South Pasadena completed a bid process for a
10,500 square foot concrete skatepark and low bid was
approximately $230,000, or $22.00 per square foot. This reflects
more current construction costs than the information we received
on the facilities the Commission visited this past summer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Identify the two or three most desired skatepark locations.
M: \MLindley,l'ARKS\.skatepark site commagd.doc
ATTACHMENT
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: August 22, 2001 (Meeting of September 4, 2001)
SUBJECT: Consider Skatepark Options
BACKGROUND
On June 4, 2001, the Commission was introduced to the topic of
one or more skateparks in Moorpark. On June 27, several
Commissioners participated in a tour of skateparks located in
neighboring cities. The tour included facilities located in the
following cities: Thousand Oaks (owned by Conejo Recreation and
Parks District), Camarillo (owned by Pleasant Valley Recreation
and Parks District), and Ventura.
The following is a brief summary of the facilities we visited:
Thousand Oaks - The skatepark is approximately 8,800 square
feet and cost about $186,000 to design and build (without
the $20,000 change order for drainage). The facility is
fenced and locked during non operating hours. The facility
is supervised when in use.
Camarillo - This skatepark is approximately 16,000 square
feet and cost about $200,000. The facility is fenced,
although it is never locked nor supervised. (Pictures of
this skatepark have been included as Attachments A, B, and
C to this Report.)
Ventura -This facility was considerably smaller than the
other two we visited, approximately 3,000 square feet. This
is one of three facilities in Ventura. It is not fenced nor
supervised. The cost of this facility is unknown.
Skatepark Options
Page 2
From the information staff was able to gather, the City can
expect to pay appropriately $20 to $25 dollars per square foot
to construct a concrete skatepark and approximately $12,000 for
lesion. Based on feedback from agencies that operate skateparks,
a skatepark facility should be no less than 10,000 square feet
and preferably closer to 15,000 square feet.
The Commission is also being presented with information about
modular skateparks. These facilities are comprised of steel,
plastic, or wooden ramps. Today, the ramps made for modular
skateparks are very durable and well constructed. A modular
skatepark can cost significantly less than a concrete facility,
if an appropriate concrete or asphalt slab already exists. They
also present more options for reconfiguring the ramps to add
variety and /or to move the ramps to an alternative location if
the original location is no longer desirable.
Modular Ramp Option
The option for the Commission to consider is the purchase of
modular ramps designed to withstand the elements and to remain
outside on a permanent basis. This differs from our current
skate ramps which are less expensive and less durable. In an
attempt to preserve the condition of the ramps, and due to the
fact that we share the multipurpose court with roller hockey,
City staff breaks down the ramps and stores them at the end of
the day.
Based on information from one skate ramp vendor, the City should
anticipate paying approximately $50,000 to equip a skatepark
consisting of 9,000 square feet (a single tennis court). A
facility of this size will hold approximately 9 ramps. For a
facility comprised of 15,000 square feet (two tennis courts),
the City should expect to pay approximately $80,000. Such a
facility could hold approximately 1S ramps. (Attachment D
illustrates the potential configurations of a modular
skatepark.)
If the City were to proceed with a modular skatepark, it may be
feasible to consider two facilities: one in the west or central
part of the City and one in the college area. Two or more
skateparks would provide greater accessibility and hopefully
encourage skaters who are using street and park hardscape
surfaces to make use of the skate ramps.
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home_ folders \MLindley \Recreation \skatepark options commagd.doc
skatepark Options
Page 3
Modular Verses Concrete _Facilities
In regards to advantages and disadvantages, as was already
stated, some of the advantages of modular skateparks over
concrete include: they cost significantly less than concrete
facilities; they provide more flexibility so if different ramps
become popular, the City can add them, and if in the future,
skateparks lose their popularity, the concrete slab surface can
be used for other purposes such as tennis or basketball.
The disadvantage of a modular skatepark is that you cannot
construct a bowl (or pool) for skating. Skaters often say they
want a 10 foot deep bowl. This is what they see competitive
skaters doing and they want to master similar skills. However,
experience shows that these types of components are
underutilized by local skaters because of their degree of
difficulty. They tend to attract more proficient skaters on a
regional bases. However, with the right modular ramps the
average skater can receive a similar challenge offered by bowls.
Other disadvantages include: the ramps need to be maintained
regularly (i.e., tightening bolts and related minor
maintenance), repainted every few years or so, and replaced
every 8 to 10 years (appropriately $4,000 per ramp on average).
Lastly, proficient, experienced skaters may not find modular
ramps challenging enough.
On the other hand, concrete facilities are more durable and they
provide a greater challenge over modular parks. The need for
major repairs is less, and as a result, requires less of ongoing
expenditure. Skaters, especially experienced skaters, prefer
concrete facilities with large ramps and deep bowls. The major
disadvantage of a concrete skatepark is its initial cost and its
long -term permanence in the event skating loses popularity.
Also, a very challenging, state -of- the -art facility will attract
experienced skaters from outside Moorpark and possibly
intimidate young and less experienced skaters.
Next Step
If the City were to proceed with the concept of a modular
skatepark, it has two options: locate the park(s) on an existing
hardcourt (tennis or basketball courts) or construct a new
concrete slab. Using an existing hardcourt would save the City
considerable money. A concrete slab will cost approximately $7
per square foot, which equates to $84,000 for a 12,000 square
foot facility. Ramps for a facility of that size would bring the
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV\ home_ folders \MLindley \Recreation \skatepark options commagd.doc
Skatepark Options
Page 4
total cost to approximately $154,000. In comparison, a 12,000
square foot concrete skatepark would cost approximately
$210,000, plus. Possible sites to consider include the multi-
purpose court at AVCP (this would displace Tri Valley Roller
Hockey); the single tennis court at Tierra Rejada Park; one
tennis court at Miller Park; or a new slab at AVCP, Griffin
Park, Glenwood Park, or Mountain Meadows Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Commission provide staff with
feedback regarding the type of skatepark desired and potential
locations.
\ \NOR PRI SERV\ home `o'_ders \MIS r.d'_ey \Recreation \skatepark ootions commagd.doc
,�
� ��' ��
. _. � �`�" �,_ � � . 3 ,d
n�
;.,:
�,
_�,.
�. .
k.,,w.
�- t..
I'
i � z
s
• 4 Y �� � � sa utr �`� - 8 ���
r x5y,
s Ali
b
t
°4a r i
1 �
K S
.7 "
CHANGE 1S GOOD
" t 1p ed iii 'f d!'i 'it s atepar9; Tie you an I,]?a 3f N"' I" -illy
isles you can f,t in a particular siZdd space. Tnen we vi; t9kan thr i.0cf)
y ft. dFs! n a,id It three dllfc.e ;1t ':Pays tc dergwlstiafe
how versatile the layout' can be. The number of transtorma` ions you can Iraka is
alm)st unlimited and they%an all be accomplished In a matter of hours iaven less
Mien you hale a park full of excited kids cheering you on).
Ask far your Rampltl;;: I uiltlffl . %'sir r.; A miniature, 3- dimensional tool that
allows you to visualize your park's potential. Arrange and rearrange configurations
with the Input of planneis, parents and your skating public... Me kids.
VISIT PILIR WEB Si"; FGR MORE I't£ 1')f!FI i; L` JPA♦ ,Kt'
WWW.SKATEWAVERAMPS.COM
;r. 7
t � ,
"Flow" is critical �-
to a skatepark
and tc skating. Flow is the
movement within your layout. Good
flow allows a skater to travel naturally and
smoothly from one obstacle to another.
Bad flow is a nasty. no -fun drag. Good flow
enables skaters to easily link "moves" or
"tricks. "SkateWave's incredible flexibility
guarantees premium flow. And that Is good.
3,000 -5,000 SQUARE FEET
neighborhood park )
F
"1
7,000 -9,000 SQUARE FEET
{ single tennis court )
13,000- 15,000 SQUARE FEET
( double tennis court )
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: October 22, 2001 (Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Park Capital Improvement Plan
BACKGROUND
The City has not prepared a formal Park Capital Improvement Plan
before. As the City undertakes larger, more complex projects, it
becomes necessary to project longer -term, future expenditures
and revenue. The attached draft documents are our first attempt
to begin formalizing the information (Attachments A and B). As
we discuss potential projects we will revise the documents to
better reflect City plans.
You can see from the draft Park Capital Improvement Plan,
Attachment A, in the current fiscal year (FY 2001/02), the City
plans to undertake $2,986,000 in capital improvements. These
items have already been included in the City's approved budget,
or there is an expressed commitment on the part of the City
Council to undertake the expenditure, as is the case with the
Aquatics Facility and AVCP Phase II. For subsequent years, I
have attempted to identify potential projects. Where I am less
confident about the date of the proposed improvement, I have
placed the item in the 'Unspecified" column. While the
Commission nor the City Council has discussed or taken action on
most of the projects identified past the current fiscal year,
with the exception of the aquatics facility, the document serves
to assist in the planning process.
Please note that I have not included the proposed skatepark in
the Plan. I elected not to do so at this time, since we had not
identified a site. The location of the facility may impact the
funding source. Depending on the size and composition of the
facility, the cost will vary. A modular skatepark of 12,000
Park Capital Improvement Plan
Paec 2
square feet would cost appror,irnately 516',000. A concre
facility of the same size will cost approximately $260,000.
Add.i_,=ionally, the Commission may wish to consider the
possibility of constructing two skatepark_s.
Attachment B identifies the projected revenue in the Park
Improvement Fund. As the Commission recalls, the Park
Irpro ement Fund is funded by developer fees or. new residerr. ial
and commercial developments. This fee is a condition of the
City's QUIMBY Ordinance and is paid in -lieu of providing park
land. Some development projects will be conditioned to build a
park, others will be conditioned to pay a fee in -lieu of a park.
The Fund is comprised cf four zones, one which funds community
facilities (Community 'Lone), including AVCP. The other three
zones (Zones 1, 2, and 3) support neighborhood parks. 0'= the
total fees collected, traditionally, sixty percent remains in:
the neighborhood zone where the development project is located,
and forty percent is placed in the Community Zone. The money car.
only be spent on park improvements and not on maintenance
activities.
As you car. see from. Attachment B, the City does not anticipate
any new Par.',-, Impr-ovemenL revenue in Zone 2; no new developments
are projected in that area of the Ci-y .n the near tear..
Additionally, once the City hits build -out (no new development),
this source of revenue will no longer be available.
Attachment C identifies the City's current fund balances in the
four Park Improvement Funds. The fund balance does not include
the estimated revenue for FY 2001102 identified in Attachment B.
As the Commission begins to consider pa -k improverrnen-.
reco.m.rendat.ions, including the proposed skatepark(s), '.t should
c- onsider the Park Capital Improvement Plan and Park Improvemerit
Fund. As always, the Commission's objective to iden� fy an—c
recommend park improvements is a difficult one. The decisions
should include a look at using the City's limited resources in a
manner that allows the City to address a broad range o-I
recreational needs.
STAFF RECObMNDATION
Receive and file.
M:`.ML mdleyTARKS \Park Capital Improve commagd.doc
:4F6' i ")1 r ir' A T
Proposed Park Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year
I Parks &Improvements 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 1 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
AVCP
Restrooms /Snack Bar
460,000
Community Pool
1,000,000
1,600,000
Phase II
1,200,000
Multi Purpose Court Lights
55,000
Gym Expansion
1,500,000
Dance Room Expansion
500,000
Tennis Court Pavilion
12,000
Therapy Pool
300,000
Softball Lights (3)
180,000
Pave Parking Lots
200,000
Group Picnic Area
60,000
Bocce Ball and Lawn Bowling
10,000
Sub Total
$2,672,000
$1,835,000
$200,000
$60,000
$1,500,000
$810,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects- 10/23/01 1
$460,000
$2,600,000
$1,200,000
$55,000
$1,500,000
$500,000
$12,000
$300,000
$6,627,000
Fiscal Year
Parks & Improvements 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
%.anipua rai n
Replace Restrooms
55,000
3,000
200,000
55,000
$200,000
Replace Pavilion
35,000
200,000
$35,000
Replace Basketball Court
60,000
$60,000
Basketball Lights
$55,000
$3,000
55,000
$55,000
Fence
17,000
$17,000
Sub Total
$35,000
$200,000
$235,000
Campus %.anyun rai n
Bail Field Lighting
55,000
3,000
55,000
$55,000
Off Site Parking
200,000
$200,000
Replace Basketball Court
60,000
$60,000
Basketball Lights
$55,000
$3,000
55,000
$55,000
Fence
17,000
$17,000
Sub Total
$17,000
$60,000
$310,000
$387,000
%,Ommufllly l+Gll \CI raI n
Replace Drinking Fountain
Replace Play Equipment
55,000
3,000
$3,000
$55,000
Sub Total
$55,000
$3,000
$58,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects - 10/23/01
Fiscal Year
Parks & Improvements 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 L 2004/05 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
Country Trail Park
Restrooms
250,000
250,000
$250,000
$30,000
$5,000
$7,000
Ball Field
Replace Tot Lot
55,000
45,000
30,000
Sand Volleyball
Expand Park
5,000
Frisbee Golf
$600,000
$2,000
Volleyball Court
Sub Total
7,000
$45,000
2,000
Replace Tot Lot
$90,000 1
45,000
$135,000
$45,000
Sub Total
$292,000
Glenwood Park
Restrooms
250,000
55,000
35,000
$250,000
Basketball Court Lights
Replace Tot Lot
55,000
45,000
$55,000
Expand Park
600,000
$600,000
$2,000
Volleyball Court
Sub Total
$45,000
2,000
Replace Tot Lot
$90,000 1
45,000
$135,000
$45,000
$952,000
Sub Total
$100,000
$250,000
$602,000
Griffin Park
Replace Basketball Court Lights
Replace Pavilion
55,000
35,000
$55,000
$35,000
Replace Tot Lot
45,000
$45,000
Sub Total
$45,000
$90,000 1
$135,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects- 10/23/01 3
Fiscal Year
Parks & Improvements 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 r 2004/05 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
1111' 11.... n 11
IVIIIICI v al 1
Soccer Field Lighting 40,000 $40,000
Basketball Court Lighting 55,000 $55,000
Sub Total $95,000 $95,000
P
Monte Vista air%
Picnic Pavilion
40,000
60,000
$40,000
Interpretive Center
Restrooms
96,000
25,000
250,000
$25,000
$250,000
Sub Total
$96,000
$95,000
$191,000
Sub Total
$25,000
$40,000
$250,000
$315,000
mountain IYleauuWD ro, n
Basketball Court Lights
60,000
$60,000
Replace Pavilion
Replace Play Equipment
96,000
35,000
$35,000
$96,000
Sub Total
$96,000
$95,000
$191,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects - 10/23/01 4
Fiscal Year
Parks &Improvements 2001/02 1 2002/03 7 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 1 UnspecifiedT Project Total
Peach Hill Park
Replace Large Barbecue
8,000
20,000
Replace Tot Lot
40,000
300,000
Soccer Field Lights
40,000
Basketball Court Lights
55,000
15,000
Gazebos
60,000
Sub Total
$8,000
$95,000
$40,000
r u IIur_z«ar rAFK
Replace Water Toy
20,000
Expand Park
300,000
Ball Field Lights
55,000
Bocce Ball and Lawn Bowling
15,000
Gazebos
60,000
Sub Total
$60,000
$20,000
$370,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects- 10/23/01 5
$8,000
$40,000
$40,000
$55,000
$143,000
$20,000
$300,000
$55,000
$15,000
$60,000
$450,000
Fiscal Year
Parks & Improvements 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 r 2004/05 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
1 lerra Rejaua rai n
Replace Play Equipment
4th Tennis Court
80,000
15,000
50,000
120,000
$80,000
$120,000
Tennis Court Lights
160,000
$160,000
Add Security Lighting
60,000
$60,000
Basketball Court Lights
$15,000
$50,000
55,000
$55,000
Sub Total
$80,000
$395,000
$475,000
virginia Colony Pain
Replace Tables
Replace Play Equipment
15,000
50,000
$15,000
$50,000
Sub Total
$15,000
$50,000
$65,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects- 10/23/01
Fiscal Year
Parks & Improvements 2001/02 1 2002/03 2003/04 1 2004/05 2005/06 1 Unspecified I Project Total
Villa Camnesina
Playground
50,000
$50,000
Domestic Water
10,000
$10,000
1/2 Court Basketball
20,000
$20,000
Monument Sign
6,000
$6,000
Sub Total
$86,000 1
1
$86,000
Total for All Parks
Fiscal Year
2001/02 1 2002/03 2003/04 1 2004/05 2005/06
2,986,000 1 2,096,000 1 715,000
Parks /Proposed Capital Projects- 10/23/01 7
310,000 1 1,500,000
Unspecified Project Total
3,057,000 $10,506,000
Park Improvement Funds
Estimated Revenue
Fiscal Year
A z'-,h vylf -14 tJ
Zone
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
Total
Community Zone
$500,000
$1,668,000
$1,676,000
$1,140,000
$980,000
$5,964,000
Zone 1
$0
$186,000
$240,000
$240,000
$0
$666,000
Zone 2
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Zone 3
$140,000
$247,000
$134,000
$0
$0
$521,000
Total 1 $640,000 1 $2,101,000 1 $2,050,000 1 $1,380,000 1 $980,000 1 $7,151,000 1
Parks /Est Revenue - 10/23/01
PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND BALANCE
FY 2001/02 ESTIMATES
ATTACHMENT "C"
PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND (2100) BY ZONE
As of March 2001
ZONE
TOTAL CASH
LIABILITIES/
ASSETS
FUND BALANCE
I - Central Zone
$ 184,000
$ 225,000
$ 409,000
II - North Zone
$ 106,000
$ 88,900
$ 194,900
III - South Zone
$ 110,000
$ (34,370)
$ 75,630
Community Zone
$2,143,000
$ (486,000) **
$1,657,000 * **
Total
$486,000
$2,336,530
* ** It is anticipated that within the next three to five years,
the Community Zone will receive 3 million in Park Improvement
fees.
**
COMMUNITY ZONE LOAN (LIABILITY) STATUS
IMPROVEMENT
LOAN SOURCE
LOAN AMOUNT
Multi Purpose Ct
Zone II
$ 85,000
RR /Ball Field
Zone I
$225,000
Subtotal
Inter -Zone
$310,000
Tennis Courts
G.F.
$176,000
Subtotal
General Fund
$176,000
Total
Inter Zone/
General Fund
$486,000
All of the figures include any interest that may be due.
MOORPARK PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services,
DATE: October 23, 2001 (Meeting of November 5, 2001)
SUBJECT: Parking Improvements at Miller Park
BACKGROUND
At a meeting of the City Council, it was requested that the
Parks and Recreation Commission consider potential parking
improvements at Miller Park that would help alleviate the
parking situation that was experienced during the spring season.
During the spring, Miller Park received a significant amount of
use, primarily in regards to its softball and picnic amenities.
During that period, there were a couple of times when the demand
for parking exceeded the number of on -site parking spaces.
Groups using the park included Moorpark High School Girls
Softball Team, which used the park to play several games during
the spring.
Since mid summer, the park seems to be used by smaller groups,
and the issue of limited parking seems to have dissipated for
the most part. The City has not received complaints regarding
the lack of parking at Miller Park since early summer. It's
difficult to determine whether the initial use at the park was a
result of the fact that it was new or if it's use will prove to
be seasonal. It may be that as time has gone by and the novelty
of the new park has worn off, the park is being used more by the
residents in the neighborhood and is attracting less city -wide
use.
Currently, Miller Park has 32 on -site parking spaces, two of
which are designated as handicapped spaces. The park is located
on Miller Parkway, which is posted "No Stopping ". The closest
streets in the area are private streets within gated residential
Miller Park Parking
Page 2
developments (Stagecoach Trail and Olive Street). When the
park's parking lot is full, the closest legal street parking is
on the south side of Peach Hill Road adjacent to Mesa Verde
Middle School. The parking in that area is restricted to Monday
through Friday from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. and weekends from 6 a.m.
to 10 p.m. The attached map illustrates the layout of the area.
The City's Public Works Director and Engineer have looked at the
situation and have identified a feasible, but costly solution.
The option proposed is that the City consider modifications to
the curb line in front of, and adjacent to, Miller Park to make
room for on- street parking. This could be accomplished by moving
the curb over into the existing planted parkway areas and
towards the sidewalk. This measure would reduce the square
footage of planted parkway in front of the park. It is estimated
that approximately 675 feet of parking on the curb would be
created, adding approximately 5 spaces between the Miller Park
driveway entrance and Olive Street, and 22 spaces between Olive
Street and Peach Hill Road, for a total of 27 off -site parking
spaces. This plan would also eliminate the bus turn -out. The
turn -out is not currently being used; however, elimination of
the turn -out would preclude a future bus stop in this area. This
turn -out is possibly the only appropriate and feasible bus stop
on Miller Parkway.
The estimated cost to modify the curb line as proposed by the
Public Works Director, is approximately $165,075. This equates
to over $6,000 per parking space. Miller Park is within Zone 3
of the Park Improvement Fund. This Zone also includes Monte
Vista, Peach Hill, Mountain Meadows, Tierra Rejada, Country
Trail, Glenwood, and Villa Campesina parks. Currently, Zone 3
has a fund balance of approximately $78,000 and it is
anticipated that it will receive an additional $140,000 in new
revenue this fiscal year. In the current budget, the City will
be spending $182,000 from Zone 3 for new playground equipment at
Mountain Meadows Park and a number of improvements at Villa
Campesina Park. Additional revenues are anticipated in fiscal
year 2002/03 in the amount of $200,000. However, the Commission
has identified potential expenditures for next year including
new playground equipment at Tierra Rejada Park, new tot lot
equipment at Glenwood and Peach Hill parks, and basketball court
lights at a number of parks in Zone 3.
M: \M Lind ley \PARKS\MiIler Park Parking commagd.doc
Miller Park Parking
Page 3
Staff did look at the feasibility of modifying the existing
parking lot, but any improvements to the parking lot appeared to
net very few additional spaces (two to three at the most).
Miller Park was designed to serve as a neighborhood park. It was
not meant to accommodate city -wide activities on a regular
basis. It is not used by youth sports for organized games, but
only for occasional practices. However, it appears that it is
being used by an men's adult soccer league on occasional
Sundays. The expense of additional parking may not be warranted
for use limited purposes.
For the aforementioned reasons, staff recommends that the
Commission not recommend that parking modifications be made at
Miller Park, at this time. Staff will continue to monitor the
parking situation and report back to the Commission if demand
increases in the future on a more regular basis.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend to the City Council that the City not undertake
parking modifications at Miller Park at this time.
attachment
M: \MLindley \NARKS \;Miller Park Parking conirnagd.doc
\� C
1
1 \�
i
pa
/ -
l� A / /r \ 4 9 •��• ( I �
I
N
�* o
\Ll-
�
of—a
i�
t 53 \ \
461- htole.J
USE DIAGRAM
Lin
F. BASEBALL FIELD (0001
2 SOCCER FIELD (221 X 1501
7 BASKETBALL COURT
A (21 TENNIS COURTS
S. RESTROOM
6 PICNIC SMELTER
T TOT LOT (PLAY AREA)
B PARXING (3o CARS)
9. PICNIC TREE GROVE
PNNr4A16 r90NMN P
/s• JWNT' L*M kl& P
[[{��¢¢ OPTM�BIM SOCCER FIELD S(ZE
P193XM WS AX6. s. F;23 X.
IELO ONE W AX15. OVERWPING TIE BASEBALL
FIELD AS ALUSTRATE0 WFTH DASHED LINE
,� &A--
r 5 .I I? TEMNIS COURTS
RE.NTNL LOT
F
;i
�i
cr a 3
Fr f 1
S
U
2 m `
<-r.
Uj
co
CC
U = u
II
adc
aa<
9�
V1 s�a�t
51EFT
i
I
I
i
r
w
COMMUNITY LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
^
r y r c 4
rr
I / lu
• 1 ' �4 a� ,m � d y �_ - -,\ �\� � it
r x a Abp R a. �i i \ `�.� az r rr� r 7.
=yA►n�/ ;
� � _ _ -_ - - -1 - -- - - _ � /,•� fix \' tT v� R' `?1�1. -. c `�..`� ` -- f `' a�j ��� �...
°R
scuooL
15 LEGEND
a
lei
THEME WALL
it
T. S� /` 1 3 ([_3_ �•'7�c7� C:'J�R '..fl VIEW FENCE
e,_I'���e' i
I & '� , /$?\ /s% S g� �' �� s ={ I �� l° - - VIEW WITH BASE
. -1 ' ~13 ?.. ( -b / , _ `.:3:n1 -'1`� s = �J /J' c 7 1,�. ° • - �'i'� POTENTIAL GLASS
,• -� �i `yR C fi L s 'I '• VIEW WALL
V •s I e. ` J nwc�..n 2 1 p-wu rr.rsi
+.l
- -
TRACTON
SYCAMORE RANCH
COMMUNITY WALL PLAN
�•