Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 1996 0403 CC REG ITEM 10B
AGENDA REPORT C = TY O1F MOORPA 2 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public DATE: March 22, 1996 (Meeting of 4 -3 -96) Works I _ CH SUBJECT: Consider Approval of the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97 and the Scheduling of a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing to Consider Changes to and the Ordering of the Annual Assessments for Said Assessment District • D1 This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and setting the dates of a Public Meeting to discuss the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1996/97, and a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for said District for next fiscal year. The amount of the assessments proposed in the Engineer's Report are based on a preliminary budget and Fund Activity detail which has been developed by staff. That and other related information is attached hereto and identified as follows: List of Exhibits Exhibit "A": Exhibit "B": Exhibit "C": Exhibit "D" : Exhibit "E": Exhibit "F ": Exhibit "G": Exhibit "H": Exhibit "I ": Exhibit "J": Assessment Summary Fund Activity Zone Activity Preliminary Budget for FY 1996/97 Capital Improvement Project Summary Street Light Cost Summary Boundary Maps Engineer's Report Public Hearing Notice Resolution Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are two types of district expenses, generally described as follows: those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to all of the lots in the City; and, ad84 -97, rpt 000133 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 2 • those expenses for the construction and maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of the lots within each zone. There are two types of Citywide expenses: street lighting costs and certain parkway and median landscape maintenance costs. All street lighting costs are distributed to all of the properties within the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weighs those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. Citywide landscaping costs are spread in a manner similar to the People use formula used by the Parks Maintenance Assessment District (AD85 -1). According to this benefit- spread formula, twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total Citywide landscape maintenance costs is allocated to non - residential properties. The remaining seventy -five percent (75 %) of such costs is allocated and spread to residential properties. These allocated costs are spread to both non- residential and residential properties by a "people -use" benefit formula based on the land use of each parcel being assessed. The maintenance costs for the improvements funded by each of the Zones of Benefit is assessed to the properties within each of those zones. In addition to these maintenance costs, certain Zones may receive an improvement assessment to fund approved improvements to be funded by those zones. Except for Zones 7 and 9, these zone expenses are distributed equally between the non - exempt parcels within each zone. The costs for the industrial parks covered by Zones 7 and 9 are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre assessment. The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. DISCUSSION A. Resolution of Intent On January 17, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96 -1174 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy of assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1996/97. On that date the City Council also selected the firm of Dwight French and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report for the district. ed94- 97.rpt 000I .34 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 3 B. Preliminary Budget for FY 1996/97 Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1996/97. A summary of the significant cost increases is as follows: 1. Street Lighting Costs -- The street lighting assessment (see Exhibit IF') is to increase approximately $18,000 in order to fully fund anticipated costs. 2. Citywide Landscape Maintenance Costs -- The Citywide landscape maintenance costs (see Exhibit 'D -31) will increase approximately $20,500 to cover maintenance costs for the addition of the medians on Tierra Rejada Road within PC -3, to those areas maintained by this assessment. 3. Zone Costs -- The total amount of all Zone Assessments will increase dramatically from $114,309 to $281,751 (an increase of $167,442). The major cause for this increase is the addition of Zone 10 (see Section D below). The total assessment for Zone 10 is $189,335. The increase in the assessments for all zones is less due to reductions in the amounts of the assessment for some of the other zones. C. Fund Activity Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for the past several years. Please note that the projected amount of the FY1995/96 Year End Available Funds ($29,676) is shown as credit amount on the Assessment Summary (Exhibit "A -111), thus reducing next year's Citywide assessment by that amount. D. Zones of Benefit Information pertaining to the expenses and assessments for each of the Zones of Benefit is set forth in Exhibit 'C'. A summary of that data is as follows: Zone 1: The proposed assessment of $7,816 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $2,448. Zone 2 a) The proposed assessment of $28,126 maintenance assessment of $21,906 assessment of $6,220. b) The proposed maintenance assessment of next year's estimated maintenance costs estimate year end surplus of $13,997. is comprised of a plus an improvement $21,906 is less than of $35,903, due to an ad84- 97.rpt 000135. AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 4 c) This will be the third year an additional $10 per lot improvement assessment has been levied upon the lots within Zone 2. When sufficient funds are available from these improvement assessments, the City will proceed with a project to construct parkway landscaping improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. Zone 3: The proposed assessment of $2,003 is significantly less than the $3,059 assessment last year. Last year's assessment was higher than the projected costs in order to fund a deficit in this Zone. Zone 4: The proposed assessment of $9,114 includes an amount required to fund a deficit in this Zone created when the City recently refunded assessments which were levied in error upon lots not within this Zone. Zone 5: The proposed assessment of $25,561 is roughly equal to the project expenditures for next year. Zone 6: The proposed assessment of $1,009 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $273. Zone 7: The proposed assessment of $12,424 includes a projected year end zone deficit of $3,804. Zone 8: The proposed assessment for this zone consists solely of an improvement assessment of $6,540 to fund a projected year end deficit for the total improvement assessments levied to fund the construction of the Home Acres Buffer project. Next year's maintenance costs are funded from a year end surplus in the maintenance assessment levied in FY 1995/96. Zone 9: A zero assessment is proposed for this Zone for next year. It is anticipated that the projected FY 1996/97 expenses will be less than the projected FY 1995/96 year end balance and that there will again be a year end surplus at the end of FY 1996/97. Zone 10 a) It is anticipated that the City will be accepting the landscape improvements along the Peach Hill Wash during Fiscal Year 1996/97. The estimated annual maintenance costs for these improvements is $57,805. It is recommended that these costs be spread to all of the properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3) via the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit (Zone 10). It is estimated that the amount of the annual assessment for a single - family residential property required to generate the total annual maintenance costs of $57,805, is $22.78. ad84- 97.rpt o 1. v AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 5 b) Should it be determined that a lesser amount is required to fund anticipated maintenance costs for the Peach Hill Wash for only a portion of FY 1996/97, the amount of the total assessment for these improvements can be reduced. c) In December of 1995 the City Council approved a request from representatives of the Homeowners Associations within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3), to consider accepting certain landscape improvements owned and maintained by the Mountain Meadows Community Association (MMCA). Prior to taking final action on that request, it is necessary for the City to determine if the City costs for this maintenance effort can be funded by increasing the proposed Zone 10 assessment. It is recommended that the amount of the proposed Zone 10 assessment identified in the Public Hearing Notice be an amount sufficient to fully fund City maintenance of these MMCA facilities. Subsequent to receipt of all public input at said hearing, the City Council may consider approval of a Zone 10 assessment which fully funds City costs for maintaining these facilities. If this additional assessment is approved, it is recommended that the City proceed with the steps necessary to accept these MMCA facilities and to provide for the future maintenance of same. d) The MMCA facilities to be conveyed to the City for maintenance consist of two areas: 1) the parkways along Tierra Rejada Road (not including the High School frontage); and, 2) an area defined as the north slope of the Peach Hill Wash. A description of those areas is shown on one of the maps set forth in Exhibit "G" of this report. e) The estimated annual maintenance costs for the Tierra Rejada Road parkways (less High School frontage) is $31,148. It is estimated that the amount of the increase to the annual Zone 10 assessment for a single - family residential property, required to fund these additional maintenance costs is $12.27. f) The estimated annual maintenance costs for the slope north of the Peach Hill Wash is $84,634. It is estimated that the amount of the increase to the annual Zone 10 assessment for a single - family residential property, required to fund these additional maintenance costs is $33.35. g) The combined amounts of these two $45.62. The estimated of the HOA fee to provide for this maintenance is in year. ®d84- 97.rpt annual assessments is required for the MMCA excess of $100.00 per 000137 AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 6 h) As described in Section E below, the Zone 10 assessment includes an additional amount of $13,690 to fund the annual costs to maintain the parkway landscaping along the frontage of Moorpark High School. It is estimated that the amount of the increase to the annual Zone 10 assessment for a single - family residential property, required to fund these additional maintenance costs is $5.39. Note: The Moorpark Unified School District has recently agreed to pay the City to provide for the maintenance of these parkways. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Engineer's Report be revised to delete this area from the list of areas maintained by the Zone 10 assessment and reduce the amount of the Zone 10 assessment from $78.42 to $73.03 ($68.40 for those lots not assessed for debris basin maintenance). i) A summary of the above described components of the Zone 10 assessment is set forth on Page 3 of Exhibit "C." j) The total annual Zone 10 assessment is spread to all of the residential properties within PC -3, and to the commercial property at the corner of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road. The total number of residential properties is 2,443. The commercial property has been assigned an assessment equal to 95 residential properties (8 dwelling units per acre multiplied by 11.81 acres). The total number of EDU (equivalent single- family residential dwelling unit) assessments is, therefore, the sum of these figures, or 2,538. Debris Basin Maintenance -- As described in Section F below, the assessment amounts for certain properties within Zone 2, Zone 5 and Zone 10 include an amount required for the maintenance of storm drain debris basins. E. High School Frontage 1. Similar to the parkways throughout PC -3, the parkways along the Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street frontage of Moorpark High School are not within the street right -of -way, but are situated on High School property. 2. Until recently, the landscape improvements within these parkways have been maintained by the developer (UWC /CCB). CCB recently advised the Moorpark Unified School District that they would no longer be providing for the maintenance of these ares. 'A. ad84- 97.rpt AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 7 3. Moorpark Unified School District has recently agreed to pay the City to provide for the maintenance of this landscaping. 4. The options available to provide for the future maintenance of the parkways along the High School frontage include the following: a) Maintenance to be provided by the Moorpark Unified School District. b) Maintenance to be provided by the City with funding from the Moorpark Unified School District (present arrangement). c) Parkways to be conveyed to the City and to be maintained by the City via: 1) the Citywide landscape maintenance assessment, or 2) the Zone 10 assessment. 5. The estimated annual maintenance costs for the parkways along the High School frontage is $13,690. As shown on Page 3 of Exhibit C, these costs have been included in the Zone 10 assessment. It is estimated that the amount of the increase to the annual Zone 10 assessment for a single - family residential property, required to fund these additional maintenance costs is $5.39. If these costs were to be transferred to the Citywide landscape maintenance assessment, the estimated amount of the increase to the annual assessment for a single - family residential property would be $1.28. Note: As noted above, the Moorpark Unified School District has recently agreed to pay the City to provide for the maintenance of these parkways. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Engineer's Report be revised to delete this area from the list of areas maintained by the Zone 10 assessment and reduce the amount of the Zone 10 assessment from $76.90 to $71.51 ($68.40 for those lots not assessed for debris basin maintenance). F. Debris Basin Maintenance It has been determined that certain properties within Zone 2, Zone 5 and Zone 10 benefit from, and are therefore assessed an additional amount for the maintenance of certain storm drain debris basins. A summary of those costs and the method of distribution of same is set forth at the bottom of Page 2 of Exhibit "C." The location of those facilities and the lots assessed for the maintenance of same is set forth in the maps set forth in Exhibit "G." ade4- 97.rpt (9 Kill l AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 8 G. Capital Improvements A detail of the proposed district funded landscaping capital improvement projects for next fiscal year is set forth in Exhibit 'E'. Those projects are summarized as follows: a. Citywide -- Consistent with prior year actions of the City Council, it is recommended that certain parkway landscaping improvements be funded by a portion of the prior year maintenance assessment surplus. It is recommended that four such projects be approved for next fiscal year, briefly described as follows: • Parkway: South side of Los Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road • Parkway: West Side of Tierra Rejada Road South of Los Angeles Avenue. • Parkway: North Side of Poindexter Ave. • Parkway: Location to be determined b. Zones of Benefit -- As discussed in Section D above, it is proposed that the City undertake a future project to construct parkway landscaping on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southhampton Road. There are no funds budgeted for this project for FY 1996/97. H. Assessment District Boundary Maps Attached as Exhibit "G" are maps showing the boundaries of Assessment District AD84 -2 and the boundaries of each Zone of Benefit within said district. This set of maps, combined with the Ventura County Assessor Maps pertaining to properties within the City of Moorpark, constitute the AD84 -2 Assessment District Boundary Maps, as required by Sections 22508, 22570 and 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code ( Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) . I. Assessment Summary The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1996/97 are set forth in Exhibit 'A'. A summary of that information is as follows: Page Description A -1 Total Assessment: The amount of the total Citywide maintenance assessment ($325,000) is an amount roughly equal to the total annual costs to AD84 -2 ($723,933), less the following amounts: • Total Zone Maintenance Cost . . . . . . . $277,378 • Total Citywide Capital Project Costs . . $ 90,000 • a credit carryover from prior years . . . $ 29,676 ad84- 97.rpt OWIA AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 9 Page Description A -2 Assessment Amounts: a. Citywide: The estimated total FY 1996/97 Single - Family Residential assessment ($30.37) is compared to last year's assessment ($27.69) at the top of page A -2. b. Zones: The Zone Assessments proposed for FY 1996/97 are compared to those levied last year at the bottom of Page A -2. For details pertaining to Zones of Benefit please refer to Section 'D' above. J. Engineer's Report Copies of Exhibits 'A' through 'G' were provided to the Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'H'). Said report sets forth the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1996/97 for various land use categories, along with an explanation of the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information. The assessment amounts contained in the Engineer's Report were derived from the benefit spread formula used in prior years. K. Public Hearing 1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. 2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the law does not require a notice of public hearing to be mailed to each property being assessed. However, consistent with past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed to the owners of all of the affected properties. 3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45) days prior to the date of the hearing. Although the Notice may be postmarked April 19, 1996, the content of the notice must be finalized by April 4, 1996, to allow sufficient time for printing and handling. ad84- 97.rpt AD84 -2 Engineer's Report April 1996 Page 10 4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased assessment. It is recommended that this Public Meeting be convened on Monday, May 20, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This will be an informal meeting conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to questions regarding projected program costs and the methods used to spread those costs to the properties assessed. 5. Attached as Exhibit 'I' is a copy of the Public Hearing Notice for AD84 -2. Said Notice sets the time and place of both the Public Meeting (May 20, 1996, at 7:00 p.m.) and the public hearing (June 5, 1996, at 7:00 p.m.). The date of the public hearing is the date of the first City Council meeting in June as required by law. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution No. 96 -1194 (Exhibit "J") a) approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2; b) declaring intention to make certain changes to and ordering the annual assessments for said assessment district for FY 1996/97; and, c) setting the dates and times of a Public Meeting and a public hearing to consider said assessments. r' 1 L' �1 4 ad84- 97.rpt EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) Fiscal Year 1996/97 AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -------------------- -------------------- Description Expense Summary ---------------------------------------------- - - - - -- TOTAL ANTICIPATED ANNUAL EXPENSES LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES Less Deleted Zone 10 LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENSES TOTAL CITY -WIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES FY 94/95 FY 95/96 Actual Budget 478,144 585,865 (80,697) (96,348) (38,500) (120,352) --- - - - - -- (120,550) ----- - - - - -- 277,095 330,467 23- Mar -96 FY 96/97 Proposed 723,933 (277,378) (90,000) 356,555 LESS PRIOR YEAR SURPLUS CARRYOVER 0 0 (29,676) LESS TRANSFER IN 0 0 0 Less Deferred Capital Improvements (34,117) --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE EXPENSES LESS CREDITS 277,095 296,350 326,879 Assessment Summary ---------------------------------------------- - - - - -- TOTAL CITY-WIDE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS manual >> 293,400 296,350 <<< PLUS CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT 0 0 --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENT 293,400 296,350 PLUS TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES >> 138,950 114,309 --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 432,350 410,659 Fo (, M,)\ a ( Mw a Ael *) >> 325,000 0 325,000 281,751 606,751 0IL41;3 EXHIBIT "A" (page 2) Fiscal Year 1996/97 AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1995/96 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY --------------------- A B SF Res Description Assmnt($) Total ($) Citywide Assessment 27.69 296,350 No. of FY1996/97 of Lots Zone Assessments Ass'ed for ---------- - - - - -- Total Debris No. Lots Basins - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- 1 77 2 622 48 3 265 4 129 5 217 75 6 22 7 95 ac. 8 City 497 Home Acres 200 9 49 ac. 10 * ** 2538 680 Total All Zones Notes: * ** Residential 2443 Commercial 95 [. 2538 Total Assessment Assmnt($) Amt ($) Per --- - - - - -- 5,939 --- - - - - -- --- 77.13 - - - - -- Lot 60,108 96.64 Lot 3,059 11.54 Lot 0 0.00 Lot 17,939 82.67 Lot 749 34.05 Lot 5,420 57.10 Acre 10,223 20.57 Lot 10,223 51.11 Lot 650 13.21 Acre 0 0.00 EDU 114,309 Per ----- - - - - -- 7,816 * L1.81 ac. x 8 du /ac = 951 - - - - -- Lot 27,773 * 44.65 19- Mar -96 FY 1996/97 ------------------------ C D SF Res Assmnt($) ----- - - - - -- Total ($) ---- - - - - -- Notes ---------------- - - - - -- 30.37 325,000 A/B : C/D C = (AxD) / B Total Assessment Amount ($) Assmnt($) ---------------------------------- L/S * L/S L/S & Basins ** only Basins Per ----- - - - - -- 7,816 * ---- - - - - -- 101.51 ----- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- Lot 27,773 * 44.65 52.00 Lot 353 ** 2,003 * 7.56 - -- Lot 9,114 * 70.65 - -- Lot 24,795 * 114.26 121.32 Lot 529 ** Lot 1,009 * 45.86 - -- Lot 12,424 * 130.88 - -- Acre 3,270 * 6.58 - -- Lot 3,270 * 16.35 --- Lot 0 * 0.00 - -- Acre %13159-1 -44?-, 2,F * 7 >-49 EDU 2,118 ** ----- - - - - -- 281,751 EXHIBIT "B" AD 84-2 Fund 23 Activity FY FY Description 1992/93 1993/94 BEGINNING BALANCE 256,185 315,355 REVENUE 449,164 03/19/96 FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97 FY---------------- - - - - -- Proposed 1994/95 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -- 224,527 152,891 192,762 142,829 ASSESSMENTS 0 374,909 440,237 431,317 441,000 606,751 INTEREST (33,055) 1,436 668 1,200 1,000 1,000 MISCELLANEOUS 0 648 5,474 1,000 0 0 TRANSFERS IN (7,958) (79) Future Capital Improvements 0 0 0 AVAILABLE FUNDS 705,349 692,348 670,906 586,408 634,762 750,580 EXPENSES YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS --- - - - - -- --------- 164,277 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 108,702 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- (12,064) ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 29,676 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 5,661 Personnel 16,727 19,360 * 20,972 * 19,300 * 19,310 * 20,900 * 0 & M 324,031 347,537 * 336,820 * 446,015 * 415,750 * 613,033 * Capital Improvements 49,236 100,924 * 120,352 * 120,550 * 56,873 * 90,000 * Less TOTAL EXPENSES ---- - - - - -- 389,994 --- - - - - -- 467,821 --- - - - - -- 478,144 --- - - - - -- ----- 585,865 - - - - -- 491,933 ---- - - - - -- 723,933 YEAR END BALANCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- - - - - -- 315,355 --- - - - - -- 224,527 --- - - - - -- 192,762 --- - - - - -- ----- 543 - - - - -- 142,829 ---- - - - - -- 26,647 - - - - -- LESS SET ASIDES: Zone 2 Improvements 0 (5,955) (12,175) (12,175) (18,395) Zone 8 Improvements (34,890) (33,055) 0 0 0 Zone 9 Improvements 0 (3,020) 0 (3,020) (2,512) Surplus Zone Maint. Assmnts 0 0 (432) (7,958) (79) Future Capital Improvements (25,360) (42,030) 0 (90,000) 0 Future Capital Improvements YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS --- - - - - -- --------- 164,277 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 108,702 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- (12,064) ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 29,676 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 5,661 �cW\Xk 2 �� � Exhibit 'C' (Page 1 of 10) Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Summary FY 1996/97 19- Mar -96 Remarks ------------------ - - - - -- ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. 642 652 661 500 Contract Equip. Total Total Total Maintenance Utility Rental Personnel Maint. Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- Cost ($) ------- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- 1 77 - -- 2,218 3,150 5,368 2 622 - -- 23,518 12,150 118 118 35,903 3 265 - -- 1,597 300 1,897 4 129 - -- 3,167 1,128 4,295 5 217 --- 19,748 5,460 176 176 25,561 6 22 - -- 576 160 ` 736 7 - -- 95 4,920 3,700 8,620 8 497 City 3,690 1,350 5,040 200 : Home Acres 9 --- 49 308 450 758 10 2,538 - -- 113,043 74,940 706 706 189,395 Total 172,785 102,788 1,000 1,000 277,573 19- Mar -96 Remarks ------------------ - - - - -- ** Paid by Performance Nursury 12 Months Maint. Exhibit 'C' (Page 2 of 10) 19-Mar -96 FY 1996/97 Zone of Benefit Maintenance Cost Detail LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 642 652 Amount of Landscape --------------- - -- Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Total Total L/S Total Total Maintained Maintenance ------- ----- - - - - -- L/S Maint. Cost ($) Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Acres - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------- - - - - -- Water -- - - - - -- Electric -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Per Lot (ac.) ------ - - - - -- Remarks ------------------------ 1 77 - -- 6,000 2,218 3,000 150 5,368 69.71 2 622 - -- 970,000 23,400 12,000 150 35,550 57.15 3 265 - -- 3,000 1,597 300 0 1,897 7.16 4 129 --- 5,640 3,167 1,008 120 4,295 33.29 5 217 - -- 91,920 19,572 5,100 360 25,032 115.35 6 22 - -- 500 576 160 0 ** 736 33.45 ** Paid by Performance 7 - -- 95 10,000 4,920 3,500 200 8,620 90.81 Nursury 8 497 City 65,340 3,690 1,200 150 5,040 10.14 12 Months Maint. 200: Home Acres 25.20 9 --- 49 308 350 100 758 15.40 10 2,538 - -- 0 112,337 73,000 1,940 187,277 73.79 Total 171,785 99,618 3,170 274,573 DEBRIS BASIN MAINTENANCE 642 661 500 Total Number of Percent Contract Equip. Total Per Lot (ac.) Total Lots Debris of Maint. Rental Personnel Basin Maint. Basin Maint. Zone - - - -- Lots - - - - -- Ass'ed - - - -- Basins ----- - - - - -- Total ------- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- Assm'nt ($) Remarks ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 2 622 48 2 11.8% 118 118 118 353 7.35 5 217 75 3 17.6% 176 176 176 529 7.06 10 2,53 & 680 12 70.6% 706 706 706 2,118 3.11 Total 803 17 100.0% 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 Exhibit 'C' (Page 3 of 10) FY 1996/97 Zone of Benefit Zone 10 L/S Maintenance Detail LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 19- Mar-96 Remarks -------- - - - - -- 163,800 sf 80,000 sf 230,400 sf 26,000 sf 642 652 Landscape --------------- - -- Contract Utility Costs ($) Total Per Lot (ac.) Maintenance ------------ - - - - -- L/S Maint. L/S Maint. Area - - - -- Description ---------------------- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------- - - - - -- Water -- - - - - -- Electric -- - - - - -- Cost ($) --- - - - - -- Assm'nt ($) -------------------- a Peach Hill Wash 35,205 22,000 600 57,805 22.78 (center portion) b Tierra Rejada Rd Parkways 20,608 10,000 540 31,148 12.27 (except H. S. frontage) Sub -Total ------- - - - - -- 55,813 -- - - - - -- 32,000 -- - - - - -- 1,140 --- - - - - -- 88,953 ------ - - - - -- 35.05 c Peach Hill Wash 48,034 36,000 600 84,634 33.35 (north slope) ------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 4 Sub -Total 103,847 68,000 1,740 173,587 68.40 d High School Frontage 8,490 ------- - - - - -- 5,000 -- - - - - -- 200 -- - - - - -- 13,690 --- - - - - -- 5.39 ------ - - - - -- Total 112,337 73,000 1,940 187,277 73.79 19- Mar-96 Remarks -------- - - - - -- 163,800 sf 80,000 sf 230,400 sf 26,000 sf Exhibit 'C' 19- Mar -96 Page 4 of 10 Summary Zones of Benefit Expenses & Assessments FY1996/97 Total 277,378 0 277,378 268,991 12,760 281,751 Expenses --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Assessments ---------------------------------------------------------- Zone - - - -- Maintenance ------ - - - - -- Improvements ------ - - - - -- Total --- - - - - -- Maintenance ------ - - - - -- Improvements ------ - - - - -- Total ---- - - - - -- 1 5,368 0 5,368 7,816 0 7,816 2 35,903 0 35,903 21,906 6,220 28,126 3 1,897 0 1,897 2,003 0 2,003 4 4,295 0 4,295 9,114 0 9,114 5 25,561 0 25,561 25,324 0 25,324 6 736 0 736 1,009 0 1,009 7 8,620 0 8,620 12,424 0 12,424 8 4,845 0 4,845 0 6,540 6,540 9 758 0 758 0 0 0 10 189,395 0 189,395 189,395 0 189,395 Total 277,378 0 277,378 268,991 12,760 281,751 Exhibit 'C' Page 5 of 10 Summary Zones of Benefit Summary of Surpluses and Reserves Summary of Zone Surplus Maintenance Assessments (Funds not a part of Citywide Surplus carryover). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Remarks ---------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Summary of Zone Reserves for Future Capital Improvements: Funds not a part of Citywide Surplus carryover. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FY 95/96 --------------- - - - - -- Zone FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Budget Actual FY 96/97 1 0 0 FY 95/96 - - - - -- 0 Zone FY 93/94 FY 94/95 --------------- Budget Actual FY 96/97 1 (987) (4,223) 0 (2,448) 0 2 (15,519) (5,495) 0 13,997 0 3 538 (1,396) 0 (106) 0 4 8,125 4,038 432 (4,819) 0 5 (7,542) 6,235 0 237 0 6 294 (307) 0 (273) 0 7 (3,279) (899) 0 (3,804) 0 8 0 1,200 0 4,924 79 9 0 0 0 250 0 10 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- --- 0 - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- Total (18,370) (847) 432 7,958 79 Remarks ---------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Summary of Zone Reserves for Future Capital Improvements: Funds not a part of Citywide Surplus carryover. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- FY 95/96 --------------- - - - - -- Zone FY 93/94 FY 94/95 Budget Actual FY 96/97 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 (9,530) 5,955 12,175 12,175 18,395 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 34,890 33,055 (63,000) (6,540) 0 9 0 3,020 0 3,020 2,512 10 0 --- - - ---- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- Total 25,360 42,030 (50,825) 8,655 20,907 Remarks --------------------- --------------------- Reserved for Parkway Project: N/S T. R. Rd @ Southhampton Buffer Area Construction Costs Parkway construction: L. A. Avenue @ Condor Drive Exhibit 'C' Page 6 of 20 Zone 1: Tract 2851: Bashi / Benwood / Flood Control Channel Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 91/92 0 6,773 6,773 5,498 1,275 92/93 1,275 6,185 7,460 9,279 (1,819) 93/94 (1,819) 91776 7,957 8,944 (987) 94/95 (987) 4,131 3,144 71367 (4,223) 95/96 0 Zone 2: Tract 2865: Budget (2,194) 51939 3,745 3,745 0 Est. (4,223) 5,939 1,716 4,164 (2,448) 96/97 (2,448) 7,816 5,368 5,368 0 19-Mar -96 Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I-------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 7,816 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7,816 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 Zone 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd; N/0 T. R. Ed. ** HIS T R Rd Pkwy ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christian Barrett & Spring Rd Maintenance - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 32,419 32,419 46,779 (14,360) 52,640 0 52,640 0 52,640 92/93 (14,360) 50,500 36,140 31,751 4,389 52,640 0 52,640 0 52,640 93/94 4,389 17,671 22,060 37,579 (15,519) 52,640 0 52,640 62,170 (9,530) 94/95 (15,519) 43,882 28,363 33,858 (5,495) (9,530) 15,485 5,955 0 5,955 95/96 Budget (7,469) 53,888 46,419 46,419 0 5,955 6,220 12,175 0 12,175 Est. (5,495) 53,888 48,393 34,396 13,997 5,955 6,220 12,175 0 12,175 96/97 13,997 21,906 35,903 35,903 0 12,175 6,220 18,395 0 18,395 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 21,906 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 28,126 <<<<<<<<<<<< 6,220 Exhibit 'C' Page 7 of 10 Zone 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkway Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 2,978 2,978 2,052 926 92/93 926 2,321 3,247 1,811 1,436 93/94 1,436 1,405 2,841 2,303 538 94/95 538 846 1,384 2,780 (1,396) 95/96 Budget (1,259) 3,059 1,800 1,800 0 Est. (1,396) 3,059 1,663 1,769 (106) 96/97 (106) 2,003 1,897 1,897 0 19- Mar-96 Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 2,003 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,003 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 Zone 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S Parkway ** S/S Parkway Maintenance Capital Improvements --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 5,930 5,930 3,485 2,445 92/93 2,445 4,212 6,657 5,883 774 93/94 774 12,118 * 12,892 4,767 8,125 94/95 8,125 0 8,125 4,087 4,038 95/96 Budget 4,342 0 4,342 3,910 432 Est. 4,038 0 4,038 8,857 ** (4,819) 96/97 (4,819) 9,114 4,295 4,295 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements PY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 9,114 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,114 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 Notes: * Includes over assessment due to lots assessed in error ** Includes $4,803.21 refund of over assessment 00(j1.52 Exhibit 'C' - - - - -- 19-Mar -96 Page 8 of 10 Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Zone 5: Tract 3019 & Tract 3025: HIS T R Rd Parkways ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** W/S Peach Hill Parkway Maintenance 91/92 0 1,452 1,452 777 Capital Improvements --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less - - - - -- Year End ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 24,355 24,355 38,842 (14,487) (307) 92/93 (14,487) 40,737 26,250 24,581 1,669 93/94 1,669 17,340 19,009 26,551 (7,542) 0 94/95 (7,542) 37,338 29,796 23,561 6,235 (273) 95/96 96/97 (273) 1,009 736 736 0 Budget 7,115 17,939 25,054 25,054 0 Total Est. 6,235 17,939 24,174 23,937 237 --- - - - - -- 96/97 237 25,324 25,561 25,561 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 25,324 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25,324 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ Zone 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven) Maintenance - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 1,452 1,452 777 675 92/93 675 879 1,554 832 722 93/94 722 678 1,400 1,106 294 94/95 294 242 536 843 (307) 95/96 Budget (229) 749 520 520 0 Est. (307) 749 442 715 (273) 96/97 (273) 1,009 736 736 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements PY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 1,009 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,009 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 000153 Exhibit 'C' Maintenance 19-mar -96 Page 9 of 10 --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Zone 7: Tract N/S L. A. Ave. E/0 Gabbert [Industrial Park) Prior Year maintenance Total Less Year End FY - - - -- ----- Capital Improvements --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less - - - - -- Year End ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance 91/92 0 720 720 0 720 0 92/93 720 3,527 4,247 3,305 942 0 93/94 942 3,087 4,029 7,308 (3,279) 0 94/95 (3,279) 10,581 7,302 8,201 (899) 0 95/96 20,445 20,445 40,890 6,000 34,890 Budget 1,080 5,420 6,500 6,500 0 1,200 Est. (899) 5,420 4,521 8,325 (3,804) 95/96 96/97 (3,804) 12,424 8,620 8,620 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- maintenance Total Improvements FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- 7,750 0 --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 12,424 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12,424 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 Zone 8: Nome Acres Buffer Area E� Maintenance - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY - - - -- ----- Carryover --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Carryover --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,445 20,445 0 20,445 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 20,445 20,445 40,890 6,000 34,890 94/95 0 1,200 1,200 0 1,200 34,890 19,245 54,135 21,080 33,055 95/96 Budget 1,200 6,550 7,750 7,750 0 (13,895) 13,895 0 63,000 (63,000) Est. 1,200 6,550 7,750 2,826 4,924 33,055 13,895 46,950 53,490 (6,540) 96/97 4,924 0 4,924 41845 79 (6,540) 6,540 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- maintenance Total Improvements FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6,540 <<<<<<<<<<<< 6,540 E� Exhibit 'C' Page 10 of 10 Zone 9: Condor Drive / L. A. Ave. Parkway [Condor Industrial Park] Maintenance --------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 19-Mar -96 Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,000 6,000 2,980 3,020 95/96 Budget 0 0 0 0 0 Est. 0 Budget 0 650 650 650 0 0 0 0 0 0 Est. 0 650 650 400 250 3,020 0 3,020 0 3,020 96/97 250 > 0 758 758 0 3,020 (508) 2,512 0 2,512 From Imp 508 / move to maint. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY1996/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 0 »»»» »»»» »»> 0 «««««« 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zone 10: PC -3: T.R Rd Parkways ** H.S. Frontage ** Peach Hill Wash ** Peach Hill Wash North Slope Maintenance --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Capital Improvements ---------------------------------------------------------- Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End Prior Year Plus Total Less Year End FY Carryover - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- --- - - - - -- Assessment --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Available --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Expenses --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Carryover Assessment Available Expenses Balance --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 91/92 0 0 0 0 0 92/93 0 0 0 0 0 93/94 0 0 0 0 0 94/95 0 0 0 0 0 95/96 Budget 0 0 0 0 0 Est. 0 0 0 0 0 96/97 0 189,395 189,395 189,395 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Total Improvements FY196/97 ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- Assessment ...... 189,395 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 189,395 <<<<<<<<<<<< 0 EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary FY 93/94 FY 94/95 ------------------------ - - - - -- Actual -- - - - - -- Actual -- SALARIES & BENEFITS 19,360 I, 20,972 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 13,600 623 Supplies 903 1,077 624 Postage 810 188 626 Printing 200 0 629 Special Supplies 307 0 637 Travel & Milage 0 0 638 Uniforms 0 0 641 Professional Services 5,190 8,210 642 Contract Services 118,620 116,928 648 Insurance 0 0 651 Equip Maint 0 0 652 Utilities 216,814 205,647 654 Vehicle Maint 218 10 655 Fuel 756 1,173 656 Lubricants 0 0 657 Small Tools 0 0 658 Maint & Repair 2,913 3,101 661 Equip Rental 806 486 M &O Total 347,537 336,820 903 Capital Projects 100,924 120,352 TOTAL 467,821 478,144 Adj. Total FY 1995/96 Budget Proj Actual 19,300 19,310 500 500 2,100 2,100 0 0 0 0 13,600 13,600 159,152 155,000 0 0 266,613 240,500 200 200 250 250 0 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 0 446,015 415,750 120,550 * 56,873 585,865 491,933 38,500 547,365 FY 96/97 Proposed Budget 20,900 500 * 2,100 * 0* 0* 0* 0* 13,600 256,160 0* 0* 335,623 200 250 0* 1,800 1,800 * 1,000 * ----- - - - - -- 613,033 * 90,000 * 723,933 Remarks: See Pg 2 See Pg 2 See Exibit E 23- Mar -96 EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 3) AD84 -2 Budget 23- Mar -96 Remarks: ----------------------- ----------------------- For Zone Cost Detail see Exhibit C -1 For Citywide Cost Detail see Exhibit D -3 See Exibit E 000157 FY 1996/97 Budget Department 143 Budget Summary -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Zones Citywide ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total ----- - - - - -- SALARIES & BENEFITS 1,000 19,900 20,900 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 0 500 500 624 Postage 0 2,100 2,100 626 Printing 0 0 629 Special Supplies 0 0 637 Travel & Milage 0 0 638 Uniforms 0 0 641 Professional Services 0 13,600 13,600 642 Contract Services 172,785 * 83,375 * 256,160 648 Insurance 0 0 651 Equip Maint 0 0 652 Utilities 102,788 * 232,835 * 335,623 654 Vehicle Maint 0 200 200 655 Fuel 0 250 250 656 Lubricants 0 0 657 Small Tools 0 1,800 1,800 658 Maint & Repair 0 1,800 1,800 661 Equip Rental 1,000 1,000 M &O Total ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 276,573 336,460 ----- - - - - -- 613,033 903 Capital Projects 0 * 90,000 * ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 90,000 ----- - - - - -- TOTAL ---------- --- - - - - -- 277,573 446,360 ----- - - - - -- 723,933 23- Mar -96 Remarks: ----------------------- ----------------------- For Zone Cost Detail see Exhibit C -1 For Citywide Cost Detail see Exhibit D -3 See Exibit E 000157 Exhibit D (3 of 3) AD84 -2: Citywide Landscape Maintenance Cost Analysis Contract and Utility Cost Detail 19- Mar-96 FY 1996/97 642 652 Amount of ------ - - - - -- -------------------- - - - - -- Total Landscaping Contract Utility Costs ($) Contract & Maintained Maintenance -------------------- -- - --- Utility Map - - - -- Description ------------------------------------ - - - - -- [Sq. Ft.] ----- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- Water - - - - -- Electric -- - - - - -- Total -- - - - - -- Cost ($) ------ - - - - -- A Campus Park Dr Ned: Princeton to Julliard 8,000 932.00 262 200 462 1,394 B Campus Park Dr Ned: Julliard to Marquette 19,712 2,328.00 606 200 806 3,134 C Campus Park Dr Ned: Marquette to Collins 19,712 2,328.00 606 200 806 3,134 Campus Park Prky (HIS): Channel to Collins 12,240 1,794.00 391 100 491 2,285 Collins Prky (W /S: Benwood to Campus Park Dr 3,600 1,282.00 391 100 491 1,773 D Moorpark Ave Prkwy (W /S): N/O High 400 308.00 63 12 75 383 E Poindexter Prky (S /S): @ Sierra 2,112 615.00 314 0 314 929 F L. A. Ave Prkwy (N /S): Hillard to Spring 4,752 1,230.00 345 0 345 1,575 G Spring Rd Prkwy (E /S): S/0 Peach Hill 15,820 1,025.00 2,377 0 2,377 3,402 S/W Corner of Peach Hill & Spring 2,400 820.00 314 0 314 1,134 H I Tierra Re}ada Median N/0 Bridge 29,568 2,035.00 314 100 414 2,449 T.R Rd Prkwy (E /S): L.A. to Harvester 1,600 553.00 366 100 466 1,019 J &K T. R. Rd Median: Spring to Peach Hill 76,032 7,257.00 9,405 200 9,605 16,862 L T. R. Rd Ned: Peach Hill to Edison Easement 16,896 3,813.00 523 100 623 4,436 P & Q Princeton Medians & Parkways 2,500 1,025.00 314 100 414 1,439 Campus Park Dr Parkway (W /O Penn) 3,000 1,230.00 345 100 445 1,675 Sub-Total Existing Areas 28,575 18,448 47,023 Areas Added This Year -- ----------------------------------- M,N & 0 T. R. Rd Ned: Bridge to Edison Easement 84,480 I 10,800.00 9,500 255 9,755 20,555 Sub -Total New Areas ------ - - - - -- 10,800 ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 9,755 -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 20,555 ------ - - - - -- ----------I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sub -Total All Areas 39,375 28,203 67,578 Miscellaneous Contract Costs 44,000 44,000 Street Lights 204,632 * 204,632 GRAND TOTAL 83,375 232,835 316,210 EXHIBIT "E" Capital Improvements 0 0 19- Mar -96 AD84 -2 Budget 63,000 53,490 0 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 Department 143 Budget Summary 0 FY 1995/96 Total Zone Capital Improvements ----- - - - - -- 63,000 ------------------- ---- - - - - -- 0 - - - - -- FY 1996/97 ----- - - - - -- 56,873 ---- - - - - -- 90,000 Projected Proposed No. Description Acc. ; Budget Actual Budget Remarks Citywide Capital Improvements -------------------------------------- Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill - 000280 7,550 3,383 Prkwy: To be - 000353 30,000 Prkwy: S/S L.A. E/0 Tierra Rejada - 000218 20,000 0 20,000 Includes $7,315 from develope Prkwy: W/S T. R. Rd S/0 L. A. Ave - 000226 10,000 Prkwy: N/S Poindexter - 000001 30,000 0 30,000 Sub-Total Citywide Improvements ----- - - - - -- 57,550 ----- - - - - -- 3,383 ---- - - - - -- 90,000 ------------------- - - - - -- Zone Capital Improvements 2 Prkwy: N/S T. R. @ Southampton 0 0 0 8 Home Acres Buffer Area - 000350 63,000 53,490 0 9 Prkwy: L. A. Ave @ Virgina Colony - 000344 0 0 0 Total Zone Capital Improvements ----- - - - - -- 63,000 ----- - - - - -- 53,490 ---- - - - - -- 0 GRAND TOTAL Capital Improvements ----- - - - - -- 120,550 ----- - - - - -- 56,873 ---- - - - - -- 90,000 EXHIBIT 'F' Street Lighting Cost Analysis AD84 -2: FY 1996/97 FY 1995/96 Summary ---------------- - - - - -- 03/19/96 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 1996/97 Street Lightin Assessment ----------------------------- - - - - -- Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 197,679 Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 3,954 Estimated Anual Cost for added lights .......... 3,000 Total 204,632 Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting Total Remarks --------- July 1995 ----- - - - - -- 15,975.49 --------- - - - - -- 0.00 ------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------ 15,975.49 Aug 1995 15,265.30 0.00 15,265.30 Sept 1995 18,921.73 0.00 18,921.73 Oct 1995 11,763.94 0.00 11,763.94 Nov 1995 20,612.00 0.00 20,612.00 Dec 1995 16,300.97 0.00 16,300.97 Six Month ----- - - - - -- Costs 98,839.43 ---- - - - - -- 0.00 ------ - - - - -- 98,839 Six month cost x2 Projected FY 1995/96 Street Light Costs 197,679 Projected Annual Cost FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Assessment 186,000 Ref. FY 1995/96 Street Lighting Surplus (11,679) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 1996/97 Street Lightin Assessment ----------------------------- - - - - -- Last Year's Projected Cost (see above) .......... 197,679 Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 3,954 Estimated Anual Cost for added lights .......... 3,000 Total 204,632 GI BOUNDARY MAP City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Exhibit 'G' O IG2 `r1 IM Iliw IIII I.11•�../ � I ry I I} _ I . r' I 1 x I ' }•�T � I ..I,•.I a... y:.0 1 i '1 -_.I _ _I_ I � 1 i• ,T� I:ANITIN � ,'�,1• ; I I -- _--- +-- _'Ln -_ -- - - - - - - - I - - -- See attached I , i pages for Zones 1 -9 as t shown on map. MOORPARK moo RK I 1 •' a I a 1 Y. + •. ti5 1 ' - —_ �i SIA� I 'VALLEY LOS �z` ' � �js;� r:.p• ' 1— •rl. � 1.1 . 1 ��� � GN Zts _ t�'•��' \'• I I - -� —_ •iti 1�`ti �• tI —. SI ; i � j � 1 ���yi..� (u,� i��� A' � I—_1 -- _ goo cc cc 000 '7 Q 05 • ANGELES ' I � 1 i- _ - -- r +----- - - - - I N Ip ■ AV .i i G I —/ 1 y• - —•I --..V 1 , 1 � I 11 '' • I Is ` a,OORPARK �' MOOR e ' ® MaintenancepAssessmentMDissttrrictLNohtADg84n2 , A j I Boundary O zA 1 P r' r Ca N Z01�1,� 1 - TiZACT 2551 I N G -3 �i 2 2 • Q OW ' � a J3 34 33 36 A 38 J! 40 W 42 Q 44 t 46 47 � 49 .If• •f 'fI lal 13 Q .11aL LOW. 76 % IJ7l+c. 132„ SS � 33 , !1 !! 17 C 19 r ' o 30 b 131 � 1 d e a 3O O z7 N 19 48 n m 134 i� s. 0 „• m w ss se A 8 9 2J.. ■ ■ 0 *I u+ eAMBI = . COURT j I fs• �i 2 2 • Q OW ' � a J3 34 33 36 A 38 J! 40 W 42 Q 44 43 46 47 � 49 .If• •f 'fI $A Z f � �esfa IlMIIU PARK § ORP �0 ©C Parkway Maintained => by Zone Assessment 000I.64 Z ON Z- 2: -T 2 Sto 5 Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment 000IGG a , a•. rq Iy1• J f^I;l -i /• Imo• ,y y 1 i _ r A t N IMmEB Ub-;% Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment C-, - S 00016fa Rr: - lS l ,' 1 k "'506) C� -tom PORTION TRACT M O-5Boko lAb#;rom&*" v0o2.6*7 I Nentun A. A. DRAIN REDRAw� WKED PREVptL Coma+ a 0 -33 "RCP c-t -7 $1 �/ LLV�l8C3 ZptJE 3 = ,C 3032 Cl . & ! ® ®0® Parkway Maintained j by Zone Assessment j ,A,. !►"ri )yu I �ac Ef ;,SOb(3) LAS Ft YdeaD.� Q . PORTION TRACT M (1.)z 173 "RCP EE CT. x a v 33 "RCP 51 U` 6-13 M Iml:ii o L� CITY OF M VENTURA ZoVA e- (4zo : T 330 (io M G• 14 Parkway Maintained by Zone Assessment I N-- i t� WT75. oil G D. GABBERT ' m COMMERCE AV I r I - MAUREEN cl> L ®;=a t -SHASTA =AVE. SHASTA 7►� bd �e �is�Qr3 = -it% °Z 8 :8 a'ro n of m ►� N w N r- cu Z N rt N W � r- cu :J :3m c+ a *:It Coe J uj 0 )y I e\ 7y I . . t, p -1( cl 140 • ,Yco.l ti ;y4o*l y6cv- to 4-) 9 Q) W E H 0 0 U) m U) >1 Q) 3: 0 9 N jt pis IL 00 01 A 4/&0 -)Yl v Or. 9 CW v N5P .:..�,� -.mss ®Y ,. MOUNTAu EADOSCOMMnITY ASSOC., PEACH HILL IL.HgNN l LOT "M" TRACT 4341 -2 118 RM 24 -25 PARK SHADYRIDGE DRIVE VCFCDIST. (FEE PARCEL) RETENTION BASIN COUNTRY TRAILS PARK Mp�NTA1N G 2 r l I� O�\ ' ;D ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE M °vN MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT MCA AILL VvAs N PREPARED BY: E WESTLAND CIVIL, INC. 100 N. RANCHO ROAD, SUITE 5 THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 R+ P PH: (805) 495 -1330 NOV. 13, 1995 ID#: CCB.LDSPESMT r\ C: \ACAD \DWG \6165 \MMCA_EXB.DWG SHT. 1 OF io PARCEL "E', TRACT 3274 -3 ^ /� J Tr+QY JGNOOL� r w, 0 lR4C7- 4 a4RC r. a 0- / P R, LAq 3 . 0, 1-1 , , 1 4/10 -3 M / ,o• PARCEL „J', TR4C PARCETRACT' 3274 -3 TR H. 1 ACT 4140 -2 b \ ,.• w PAHt,c� - 41 P�11 T R 1111 �1 R,ipr or MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE PARCELS PP?IK w "s n � 1 c c a N MppRPgRK HIGH SCHpp! 4 l RqC T + I ,tea, .--r� ^` 1` J i 5"36 _ - Z F PCS Pk o V,5 P M�PO MOUNTAIN MEADOWS COMMUNITY ASSOC. LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE PARCELS n N C-,_1t ()OVJlsa I I fa?w. JIJ PORTION TRACT M 504 TR. 43486 « O � m l 01 . 43408 17 V O+ 2 O 26 600' 163 B <�o 12 +y, 5 Vi %a to o f 6 e ��t 434 ,� F4 A.SA �` N� 506 > Ta .12 43404 18 ct 04 19 X Lfr� ��c �Kqf>• x ., TR. 4340.4 CITRUS A DRIVE r r C rry B 0 ph W _ A3 TRACT y 15 4t42 8 N 1 T 24 4341_1 12 !8 DALAWAY, DRIVE pRIV � Q 08 11 12' 10 a TRACE 2016 -5 INDEX TRACT 2016 -2 BOOK 505 Bk Wnturo County Assessor's Mop. Awuati 8�xi Wn,owt 57b.n n EIi{wt A* Agq�orti fts." PweM Mrro�n y n C ►rJw. MN/d 1i/n0'fY Sno.n n Spsraa * '1110a;�% DRAWN ICHECKED REDRAWN a IDATE 10.5.81 O ErMTIYE_ROLL PREVIOUS SK. 517, PCR. OF INDEX C"P,IN4 By Vwnfuru Count A� aort OlF rB TRACT 2016 -2 BOOK 505 Bk Wnturo County Assessor's Mop. Awuati 8�xi Wn,owt 57b.n n EIi{wt A* Agq�orti fts." PweM Mrro�n y n C ►rJw. MN/d 1i/n0'fY Sno.n n Spsraa * '1110a;�% DRAWN ICHECKED REDRAWN a IDATE 10.5.81 INKED B.W ErMTIYE_ROLL PREVIOUS SK. 517, PCR. OF INDEX C"P,IN4 By Vwnfuru Count A� aort OlF I I r-t�P4 %aA� to JV6 1" cod (4) C QTY PAGE INDEX I BOOK 506 CITY OF MOORPARK DR**'N I CHECKED REDRAWN D.V. DATE 10 MIXED DV. _7- . EFFECTlvE ROLL PREVIOUS SK. 517 POR. PAGE INDEX CWNIOW By WnkM CWl A$"".$ Of F. ,w N V1 d3a.�Z WAR "Y ru MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (i °• •,d �d3N.Zl� � I �y NNns I s �l 43VAdd y t� 3d0-IS 10 3111 Amp d38.tZ d38.4Z O o y 8•Q M qtr dO8jZ O ,, d0 Z- d0a.9� 08.9* _ dO8.Z -V r� dO8.96 �d11S1 .8� J13aava d38.91 d38„99 © doa.Z dON 92 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor '7iZ J .is E. 010 'N JNTER fiber 9 ti 1 Y � dON.96 m� .. E. 010 'N JNTER fiber 9 ti t w-F t fy m 0 PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 Prepared By: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1470 S. Valley Vista Drive Suite 290 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 March 1996 '00011 'U TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Authority for Report Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained Section 3 Assessment Roll Section 4 Method of Assessment Section 5 Estimate of Cost Appendix "A" Street Lighting Formula - Table 1 Appendix "B" Landscape Formula - Table 2 Appendix "C" Assessment Summary - Table 3 Appendix "D" Budget Estimate Appendix "E" Boundary Map Appendix "F" Assessment Roll Appendix "G" Resolutions Appendix "H" Rebate Procedure Paae 1 10'' 1 21 4 0 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1996 -1997 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of January 17, 1996 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 1997 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the City. In addition, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public landscaping within the public right -of -way. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED This report covers the period of July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization. The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for the maintenance of the landscaping improvements along the Peach Hill Wash, which will be designated as Zone 10. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the City. Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, 1 or this servicing shall be as authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement will be borne by owners within that project. These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 77 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas and debris basins within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon these 622 lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 129 lots within the tract. S. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 Maintenance costs associated with debris basins and landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and 2 () 1 LS;a parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 217 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. West Village Buffer Area Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, the commercial and multi- family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east, Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west, Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342 and multi - family areas) and the Home Acres. 9. Condor Drive Industrial Park Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place will be borne by the developed parcels within the Industrial Park. 10. Peach Hill Wash Maintenance costs associated with landscaping and debris basin within this area will be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3). Plans and specifications for the irrigation, landscaping and lighting of streets, parks and easements, and other authorized improvements within the City are on file in the Department of Public Works. The lighting locations and specifications for Edison -owned lights are on file with the Southern California Edison Company. Reference is hereby made to said plans and specifications for the exact location and nature of the landscape and lighting improvements. Said plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report. 3: SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefit: People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 1.00 4 000195 Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table 1) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Protection 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non- residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, 5 OWILSE with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non- residential uses being assessed for the remaining 250 of the maintenance costs. The "people use" factors utilized in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "B ". Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix "H." SECTION 5 BUDGET ESTIMATE The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in Appendix "D" of this report. The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. \rpt \O50ad842.dc2 6�if APPENDICES APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use Lighting Code Description 0 Residential Vacant 1 Single Family - Assessment Level 1 2 Mobile Home 3 Condo (Per Unit) 4 Residential Income 0.25 (2 -4 Units) 1.00 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 0.00 Per Unit 6 Single Family - 0.25 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 0.50 Trailer Park 0.25 (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.05 Land 11 Retail Stores, 0.50 Single Story 0.20 (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 0.05 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 0.00 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers $ 5.37 (Regional) 17 Office Building 4.00 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 1.00 (Multi- Story) $ 85.99 (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores People Lighting Total Annual Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $ 16.12 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $139.74 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $139.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $85.99 A -1 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 21 Restaurants & 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 Loans 25 Service Stations 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 32 Warehousing 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $ 85.99 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 1.50 1.50 5.00 $107.49 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $ 64.50 44 Truck Crops 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 48 Poultry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 51 Orchards 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 53 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 55 Feed Lots 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 57 Tree Farms 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $ 21.50 61 Theater 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $107.49 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $ 5.37 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -2 Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 $ 43.00 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 A -3 APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 2 Landscape Maintenance Formula Use People Code Description Use 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 1 Single Family - Level 1 4.00 2 Mobile Home 0.00 3 Condo (Per Unit) 3.00 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 3.00 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 3.00 Per Unit 6 Single Family- 4.00 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & 3.00 Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 Land 11 Retail Stores, 3.00 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 3.00 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 10.00 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 30.00 (Regional) 17 Office Building 3.00 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 6.00 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 6.00 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) Annual Assessment $ 0.00 $ 11.12 $ 0.00 $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 8.34 $ 11.12 $ 8.34 $ 0.00 $ 49.99 $ 49.99 $166.64 $499.92 $ 49.99 $ 99.98 $ 99.98 B -1 0202 Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 21 Restaurants & 3.00 $ 49.99 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 3.00 $ 49.99 Loans 25 Service Stations 3.00 $ 49.99 26 Auto Sales, Repair 1.00 $ 16.66 Storage, Rental 30 Industrial land 0.00 $ 0.00 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 12.00 $199.97 32 Warehousing 4.00 $ 66.66 33 Industrial Condos, 3.00 $49.99 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 3.00 $ 49.99 44 Truck Crops 2.00 $ 33.33 46 Pasture (Permanent) 2.00 $ 33.33 48 Poultry 2.00 $ 33.33 49 Flowers, Seed Products 2.00 $ 33.33 51 Orchards 2.00 $ 33.33 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.00 $ 33.33 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 2.00 $ 33.33 55 Feed Lots 2.00 $ 33.33 57 Tree Farms 2.00 $ 33.33 61 Theater 2.00 $ 33.33 69 Parks 0.00 $ 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0.00 $ 0.00 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 $ 0.00 72 Schools 0.00 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 $ 0.00 78 Public Buildings, 0.00 $ 0.00 Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 $ 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 $ 0.00 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 $ 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 $ 16.66 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 $ 0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 $ 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 $ 0.00 B-2 000, 201 3 Use People Annual Code Use Assessment 94 Undedicated 0.00 $ 0.00 Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 $ 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 $ 0.00 Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 77 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $107.07. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $44.65. Forty -eight (48) lots are assessed for an additional $7.35 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The additional cost per lot is $7.56. 4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3. The additional cost per lot is $70.65. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The B -3 additional cost per lot is $114.26. Seventy -five (75) lots are assessed for an additional $7.05 per lot for the maintenance of the debris basins.The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot is $45.86. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 93 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost is $130.88 per acre. 8. In addition to the above landscape charge, 497 lots within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342 are assessed an additional $6.58 per lot, for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. The Home Acres, not to be levied for any City -wide lighting and landscape charges, are to be assessed for $16.35 per lot for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. 9. In addition to the above landscape charge, 11 lots within the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an additional landscape charge for the improvements and maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony Place. The additional cost is $0.00 per acre. 10. In addition to the above landscape charge, 2538 lots within the Mountain Meadows Planned Community (PC -3)are assessed an additional landscape charge for the improvement and maintenance along the Peach Hill Wash. The additional cost is $73.79 per equivalent dwelling unit. Six hundred and eighty (680) lots are assessed for an additional $3.11 per lot for the maintenance of debris basins. B -4 000 ;W5 Use Code 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 21 24 APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Landscape Lighting Description Assessment Assessment Residential $0.00 $ 5.37 Vacant Single Family - Level 1 Mobile Home Condo Residential Income (2 -4 Units Apartments (5 +) Single Family - Level 2 Mobile Home and Trailer park Commercial Vacant Land Retail Stores, Single Story Store & Office Combination Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) Shopping Centers (Regional) Office Building (1- Story) Office Building (Multi- Story) Retail Stores (Multi- Story) Restaurants & Cocktail Lounges Banks, Savings Loans 11.12 0.00 8.34 8.34 8.34 11.12 8.34 0.00 49.99 49.99 166.64 499.92 49.99 99.98 99.98 49.99 49.99 C -1 21.50 0.00 21.50 21.50 16.12 16.12 16.12 5.37 85.99 85.99 139.74 139.74 64.50 85.99 85.99 107.49 64.50 Total Assessment $ 5.37 32.62 0.00 29.84 29.84 24.46 27.24 24.46 5.37 135.99 135.99 306.38 639.66 114.49 185.98 185.98 157.48 114.49 bowod c Use Code 25 26 Ceti] 31 32 33 38 44 46 48 49 51 53 54 55 57 61 69 70 71 72 73 78 79 80 81 83 86 88 91 92 93 94 C -2 Lighting Assessment $ 85.99 85.99 5.37 107.49 85.99 107.49 64.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 107.49 0.00 5.37 5.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.37 0.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Assessment $ 135.99 102.66 5.37 307.46 152.65 157.48 114.49 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 140.82 0.00 5.37 5.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.37 0.00 59.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 tJ Landscape Description Assessment Service Stations $49.99 Auto Sales, Repair 16.66 Storage, Rental Industrial Land 0.00 Vacant Light Manufacturing 199.97 Warehousing 66.66 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 49.99 Mineral Processing 49.99 Truck Crops 33.33 Pasture (Permanent) 33.33 Poultry 33.33 Flowers, Seed 33.33 Production Orchards 33.33 Field Crops, Dry 33.33 Pasture of Graze, 33.33 Dry Feed Lots 33.33 Tree Farms 33.33 Theater 33.33 Parks 0.00 Institutional 0.00 Vacant Land Churches, Convent, 0.00 Rectory Schools 0.00 Colleges 0.00 Public Buildings, Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 Flood Control 0.00 Misc. Vacant Land 0.00 Utility Water Co. 0.00 Petroleum & Gas 16.66 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 Highways & Streets 0.00 Utility - Edison 0.00 Telephone 0.00 S.P.R.R. 0.00 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 C -2 Lighting Assessment $ 85.99 85.99 5.37 107.49 85.99 107.49 64.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 107.49 0.00 5.37 5.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.37 0.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Assessment $ 135.99 102.66 5.37 307.46 152.65 157.48 114.49 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 54.83 140.82 0.00 5.37 5.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.37 0.00 59.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 tJ Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. C-3 000205 APPENDIX "D" CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1996 -97 ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 7,816.00 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee:Landscape 27,773.00 Debris Basins 353.00 3. Tract No. 3032 D-1 000zW Buttercreek & Peppermill 2,003.00 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 9,114.00 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington: Landscape 24,795.00 Debris Basins 529.00 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 1009.00 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 12,424.00 8. West Village Buffer Area 6,540.00 9. Condor Parkway 0.00 10. Peach Hill Wash: Landscape 187,277.00 Debris Basins 2,118.00 SUBTOTAL $281,751.00 D-1 000zW BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1996 -97 Total Annual Expenses Less Zone Maintenance Expenes Less Capital Improvements Total City -Wide Maintenance Less Prior Year Surplus *Total City Wide Assessment Total Zone Assessment Total Assessment *Street Lighting Landscape $ 204,632.00 122.247.00 Total $ 326,879.00 D -2 $ 723,933.00 (277, 378.00) (90,000.00) $ 356,555.00 (29,676.00) $ 326,879.00 281,751.00 $ 608,630.00 00021W APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAPS tiou il. APPENDIX "F" Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 8577 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. 10 APPENDIX "G" RESOLUTIONS 000%1.3 APPENDIX "H" REBATE PROCEDURE I a I I 1 ELOISE BROWN Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tom CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. Councilmember PAUL LAWRASON Councilmember SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember RICHARD T. HARE . City Treasurer . , • • MOORPARK r , r r H E H O R A N D U H TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Budget and Finance Committee DATE: November 1,'1989 ! : t :STEVEN KUENY City Manager . CHERYL J. KANE . City Attorney (PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development ' R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE !; i : r . Chief of Police tr :'Trp i•i !lr'I�l SUBJECT: Procedures for Rebate of Assessments Pursuant to the Council's direction in July, 1989, the-Bui!g'Cand Finance Committee has developed proposed procedures to implement rebates for the annual assessments for AD 84 -2 and AD 85 -1. The proposed procedures are as follows: 1. Owner occupant with rebate only on property granted a' homeowner's exemption. 2. Demonstrate that there is no tax delinquincy on ... the property and the assessment(s) for which the rebate is requested have been paid. 3. Gross family income may not exceed two - thirds of the then current County median income; the most recent state and federal tax return must be presented to verify family income and family size. Regardless of the above, persons who feel that special hardship circumstances exist and who meet other applicable criteria may apply for a rebate. The City Council's Budget and Finance Committee shall make a determination on all such requests with a confidential report to Council on all approved requests. 4. Persons granted property tax assistance under the Gonsalves - Deukmejian- Petris Property Tax Assistance Law upon presentation of proof of such assistance and meeting items 1 and 2, above, shall be eligible for rebate. 744 Mnmmnrl, A.. --..^ ()() 1i4:L5 i i i i i i i i i i i i The Honorable City Council November 1, 1989 Page 2 S. A rebate may be requested between January 1 and May 31 of any fiscal year for assessment due and payable during that same fiscal year consistent with the above criteria. No rebate will be granted for delinquent assessments paid during any subsequent fiscal year. 6. Staff will issue press releases concerning the rebate process in January, April and July of.each year. The rebate procedure will also be contained in the Engineer's Report for both Assessment Districts. 7. Rebates of City -wide assessments of both Assessment Districts will be funded by the City's General Fund. Rebates of special zone of benefit assessments will be funded by the respective zone.of benefit for that District. 8910319 MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 198-L ACTION: 00021: T - I JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 3, 1996, adopted Resolution No. 96 -1194 fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 20th day of May 1996, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public meeting is to allow the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84-2" for the fiscat year commencing on July 1, 1996 and ending on June 30, 1997, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape ,maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City, and to question and discuss the proposed increases in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY 1995/96. PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 96 -1194 also feed the date and time of a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the 5th day of June, 1996, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said ublic hearing is to consider making certain charges in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORP= LIGHTING AND. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1996, and ending on June 30, 1997, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within the said City. A copy of Resolution No. 96 -1194 which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFbRNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1997 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of said Resolution is summarized as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Report prepared for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97 is approved. 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to applicable State law. 3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1995/96 are proposed to increase from the amount of the'assessments levied for said district in FY 1995/96. 4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain charges to Assessment District No. AD 84-2, b) to order the extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1996/97; and c) to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city-wine zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and otter ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irri atron, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. 5. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the lightingg and landscaping sites with all improvements located therein, descnbed by and included within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2. 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, the boundary of which is described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office. 7. That said proposed maintenance and improvement is of benefit to, and expense for which are chargeable upon, the district. 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. 9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessments and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 10. That a public meeting shall be convened on May 20, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to allow the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1996/97, and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY 1995/96. 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June 5, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City Hall to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment District No. AD94 -2 for FY 1996/97. 12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, in order that any pe,sons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997. Protests must be in writing and must be filed by the pproperty owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing. Protests may be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021. Protest shall state all grounds for the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property being assessed. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. For additional information about these proceedings or assessments contact Ken Gilbert at (805) 529 -6864, Ext. 256. 13. That all the work proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public meeting and public hearingg to be given by causing this summary of the Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of by 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. 15. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ATTEST: City er Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, and is dated this 3rd day of April, 1996. 0002" ILS City er Exhibit 'A' 1-7- AD 84-2 Summary of Assessmentg A. City Wide Assessments Use Proposed Proposed Code Description Exisitng AssmntM FY 1996/97 Assmnt Increase (Decrease) 0 Residential Vacant 4.94 5.37 0.43 1 Single Family - Level 1 27.69 32.62 4.93 2 3 Mobil Home Condo 0.00 25.71 000 29.84 000 4.13 4 Residential Income 2-4 units 25.71 29.84 4.13 5 Apartments (5 +) 20.77 ,- 24.46 3.70 6 9 Sin gle Family - Level 2 Mobil Home & Trailer Park 22.75 27.24 4.49 10 Commercial Vacant 20.77 4.94 24.46 5.37 3.70 0.43 11 12 Retail Store, single story Store & Office 114.69 135.99 21.30 15 Combination Shopping Centers eighborhood) Regional) 114.69 247.20 135.99 306.38 21.30 59.17 16 17 Shopping Centers Office Building one story) 484.60 639.66 155.05 18 Office Building multi -story) 94.92 150.30 114.49 185.98 19.57 35.66 19 Retail Stores (multi -story) 150.30 185.98 35.66 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 134.46 157.48 23.02 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 94.92 114.49 19.57 25 26 Service Stations Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 114.69 90.95 135.99 102.66 21.30 30 Industrial Land Vacant 4.94 5.37 11.71 0.43 31 Light Manufacturing 241.29 307.64 66.17 32 33 Warehousing Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 126.56 134.46 152.65 157.48 26.09 23.02 38 44 Mineral Processing Truck Crops 94.92 114.49 19.57 46 Pasture (permanent) 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 11.32 48 49 Poultry Flowers, seed prroduction 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 51 53 Orchards Field crops, dry 43.51 54.83 11.32 11.32 54 Pastures of graze, dry 43.51 43.51 54.83 54.83 11.32 11.32 55 57 Feed lots Tree farms 43.51 54.83 11.32 61 Theater 43.51 122.59 54.83 140.82 11.32 18.23 70 Institutional vacant land 4.94 5.37 0.43 71 78 Churches, convent & rectory Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museums, etc. 4.94 5.37 0.43 80 Misc, Vacant land 0,00 4.94 000 5.37 000 0.43 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 91 Petroleum & gas Utility Edison 51.41 0.00 59.66 0.00 8.25 0.00 92 93 Telephone SP RR 0.00 000 000 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 B. Zone of Bene t: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by land use categories, the each of the Zones listed below will be lot properties within assessed a per Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those Zones. FY 1995/96 Proposed FY 1996 /97 Proposed Increase T- Zone Descri tioa ract ar sways ® Bambi; Assmnt Assmnte1 Benwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 96.64 * 52.00 * (44.64) Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra Rejada; South slopes & Christian Barrett and Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 11.54 * 7.56 * (3.98) Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 0.00 70.65 * 70.65 south side of Williams Ranch Rd. 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 82.67 * 121.32 * 38.65 side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side of Peach Hill Rd-, south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway ® Inglewood 34.05 * 45.86 * 11.81 west end of Ave. 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 57.10 ** 130.88 ** 73.78 8 L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of L.A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer: • City area 25.57 * 6.58 * (18.99) • Home Acres 51.11 * 16.35 * (34.76) 9 Condor Drive 13.21 ** 0.00 ** (13.21) 10 Mountain Meadows Planned Community Residential 0.00 * 71.51 * 71.51 Commercial 0.00 * 6,460.50 * 6,460.00 Note: * Per parcel Assessment ** Per Acre Assessment wp\rpt\ad85- 97.not RESOLUTION NO. 96 -1194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1996, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1997, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 96 -1174, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 1996/97, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 29th day of March 1996; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said report and to the levy of the assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997, filed with the City Clerk on the 29th day of March 1996, is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 3. That the amount of the assessments for FY 1996/97 are proposed to increase over the amount of the assessments levied in FY 1995/96. SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes, to the "MOORPARK 000220 Resolution No. Page 2 LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" and to order the extension of the annual assessments for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for certain improvements as described herein, in accordance with said Act. Said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city- wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public lighting within the City, to install, construct or maintain any authorized improvements under the Act, including but not limited to one or more of street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities, and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including irrigation, electric current and energy; and to provide incidental expenses in connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the improvement and maintenance of the above described landscaping and related improvements in a number of zones of benefit. SECTION 5. That said lighting and landscape maintenance assessment district shall specifically include the lighting and landscape sites with all improvements located therein, described by and heretofore included within "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2." SECTION 6. That the foregoing described work is to be located within said Assessment District, the boundary of which is more particularly described on a map on file in the City Clerk's office, and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 84 -211, filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 29th of March 1996. SECTION 7. That the proposed maintenance and improvement, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit to, and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said maintenance and improvements chargeable upon the district. SECTION 8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. SECTION 9. That the proposed assessment amounts are set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. 0221 Resolution No.- Page 3 SECTION 10. That a Public Meeting shall be convened on the 20th day of May 1996, at the hour of 7:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of allowing the public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed assessments for FY 1996/97. SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be convened on the 5th day of June 1996, at the hour of 7:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding the proposed assessments for FY 1996/97. SECTION 12. That Joint Notice of said Public Meeting and public hearing is hereby given. All persons interested in learning more about the proposed assessments and the basis for same, are invited to attend said Public Meeting. All persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1996, and ending June 30, 1997. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will cause the assessment increase to be abandoned. SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Joint Notice of Public Meeting and public hearing to be given by causing a summary of this Resolution to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd day of April, 1996. ATTEST: City Clerk Paul W. Lawrason Jr . , Mayor Resolution No. 96 -1194 Exhibit 'A' AD 84 -2 summary of Assessments A. City Wide Assessment Use Landscaping Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment (51 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 5.37 5.37 1 Single Family - Level 1 11.12 21.50 32.62 2 Mobil Rome 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo (per unit) 8.34 21.50 29.84 4 Residential Income 2 -4 units (per unit) 8.34 21.50 29.84 5 Apartments (5 +) (per unit) 8.34 16.12 24.46 6 Single Family - Level 2 11.12 16.12 27.24 9 Mobil Home & Trailer Park (per space) 8.34 16.12 24.46 10 Commercial Vacant Land 0.00 5.37 5.37 11 Retail Store, single story 49.99 85.99 135.98 12 Store & Office Combination (per parcel) 49.99 85.99 135.98 15 Shopping Centers (Neighborhood) 166.64 139.74 306.38 16 Shopping Centers (Regional) 499.92 139.74 639.66 17 Office Building (one story) 49.99 64.50 114.49 18 Office Building (multi- story) (per parcel) 99.98 85.99 185.98 19 Retail Stores (multi-story) (per parcel) 99.98 85.99 185.98 21 Restaurants & cocktail lounges 49.99 107.49 157.48 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 49.99 64.50 114.49 25 Service Stations 49.99 85.99 135.98 26 Auto sales, repair, storage & rental 16.66 85.99 102.65 30 Industrial Land Vacant 0.00 5.37 5.37 31 Light Manufacturing 199.97 107.49 307.46 32 Warehousing 66.66 85.99 152.65 33 Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's 49.99 107.49 157.48 38 Mineral Processing 49.99 64.50 114.49 44 Truck Crops 33.33 21.50 54.83 46 Pasture (permanent) 33,33 21.50 54.83 48 Poultry 33.33 21.50 54.83 49 Flowers, seed production 33.33 21.50 54.83 51 Orchards 33.33 21.50 54.83 53 Field crops, dry 33.33 21.50 54.83 54 Pastures of graze, dry 33.33 21.50 54.83 55 Feed lots 33.33 21.50 54.83 57 Tree farms 33.33 21.50 54.83 61 Theater 33.33 107.49 140.82 70 Institutional vacant land 0.00 5.37 5.37 71 Churches, convent & rectory 0.00 5.37 5.37 78 Public Bldgs., Fire Houses, Museums 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc, Vacant land 0.00 5.37 5.37 81 Utility, Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & gas 16.66 43.00 59.66 91 Utility Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 SPRR 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Condo Development 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Resolution No. 96-1194 Exhibit 'A' (2 of 2) 84 -2 Suuary of Assessments ss B. Zones of Benefit: In addition to the Citywide assessments listed above by land use, the properties within each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment for the maintenance of certain improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within those zones. Notes: * Amount of assessment for those parcels assessed for strom drain debris basin maintenance. ** 2,538 EDU = 2,443 residential units plus 95 equivalent residential assessments levied upon one commercial property. 000224- Total Number Assessment Amount Zone Description Assessment of Lots pgr Lot per Yr ($) 1 Tract 2851: Parkways @ Bambi; 7,816 77 101.51 Benwood, Pecan & VCFCD Channel 2 Tract 2865: Parkways East side 28,126 622 44.65 Peach Hill, north side Tierra * 52.00 Rejada; south slopes & Christian Barrett & Spring 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and 2,003 265 7.56 Peppermill parkway 4 Tract 3274: Parkways, north and 9,114 129 70.65 south side of Williams Ranch Rd 5 Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north 25,324 217 114.26 side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side * 121.32 of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway & slope 6 Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway @ 1,009 22 45.86 west end of Inglewood Ave. 7 Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert 12,424 95 130.88 / ac. & L. A. Ave.: Parkway North side of acres L. A. Ave east of Gabbert 8 Home Acres Buffer: • City area 3,270 497 6.58 • Home Acres 3,270 200 16.35 9 Condor Drive Industrial Park 0 49 0 / ac. acres 10 PC -3: Tierra Rejada Road Parkways 175,705 2,538 68.40 / EDU ** EDU * 71.51 / EDU ** Notes: * Amount of assessment for those parcels assessed for strom drain debris basin maintenance. ** 2,538 EDU = 2,443 residential units plus 95 equivalent residential assessments levied upon one commercial property. 000224-