HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2002 0605 CC REGResolution No. 2002 -1975
Ordinance No. 282
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5, 2002
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. INVOCATION:
Father Michael Sezzi, Holy Cross Catholic Church.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
4. ROLL CALL:
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Introduction of New Employee, John Hartnett,
Recreation Superintendent.
B. Introduction of Sergeant Pat Buckley and Senior Deputy
Kim Rich.
C. Recognition of Deputy Mike Hartmann, 2001 Moorpark
Police Officer of the Year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of
the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item.
Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards
must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the
Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items
prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion
of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the
beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon
each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of
three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written
Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings
and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the
agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public
review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at
517 -6223.
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 2
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: (continued)
D. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the
City of Moorpark's Outgoing Teen Council.
E. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the
Moorpark High School Cross - Country Team.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(AT THIS POINT IN THE IrEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.)
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Final Review and Changes to the Engineer's
Report for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment Districts, Adoption of a Resolution
Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/2003,
and Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year
2001/2002 Budget to Fully Fund Certain Landscaping and
Lighting Costs. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the
Public Hearing, receive testimony, and close the
Public Hearing; 2) Approve the changes to the
Engineer's Report; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- ,
(Exhibit 3) making certain changes to and confirming
the assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/03; 4) Direct
staff that the amount of the assessment for Zone 11 to
be levied upon the affected properties shall be
reduced to $33.78 per lot; 5) Adopt Resolution No.
2002- , (Exhibit 4) amending the Fiscal Year 2001/02
Budget by appropriating monies from the General Fund
and the Gas Tax Fund to fund projected Fiscal Year
2001 /02 Fund deficits for street lighting and
landscape maintenance; and 6) Direct staff to prepare
a similar Resolution in June of 2003 providing for a
like fund transfer to fund the then projected Fiscal
Year 2002/03 year -end Fund deficits for street
lighting and landscape maintenance. (ROLL CALL VOTE
REQUIRED)
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 3
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Presentation on Grassroots Network and LOCAL
(Leave Our Community Assets Local) Coalition
Activities by David Mullinax, Regional Representative,
League of California Cities. Staff Recommendation:
Receive presentation by League of California Cities
(no agenda report).
B. Consider Resolution Adopting an Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for the City of Moorpark for the
Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2002- . (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
C. Consider Selection of a Consultant to Prepare a
Feasibility Report Pertaining to Efforts Required to
Seek a Prohibition of Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route
118 Between Route 23 and Route 34. Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff to retain Parsons to
perform the subject study in a manner consistent with
the parameters set forth in the agenda report.
D. Consider Resolution Approving the Preliminary
Assessment Engineer's Report, the Parks and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District Levy
Amount, and Setting the Date for the Public Hearing
for June 19, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2002- , approving the preliminary
Engineer's Report and assessment amount contained
within, and setting the public hearing date for June
19, 2002.
E. Consider Pool Ad Hoc Committee Recommendation for
Community Aquatic Facility. Staff Recommendation: 1)
Concur with the City's Pool Ad Hoc Committee to take
no further action on the design and construction of
the Community Aquatic Facility at Arroyo Vista
Community Park (AVCP); 2) terminate the City's
Agreement with Martinez Architect Inc.; and 3)
evaluate the status of the aquatic facility project
during the Fiscal Year 2003/2004 Goals and Objectives
process.
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 4
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued)
F. Consider Authorizing City Manager to Approve an
Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding Between
the City of Moorpark and North Park Village L.P., a
Professional Services Agreement Between the City and
BonTerra Consulting for the Preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Related Services
for the North Park Village Specific Plan Project (SP-
2002-01), and a Professional Services Agreement
Between the City and Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.,
for North Park Village Traffic Analysis. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Authorize the City Manager to
approve and sign an Amendment to the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and North Park Village
L.P., including EIR and Traffic Study deposit
requirements, revised project schedule and EIR
certification decision time period, and subject to
City Attorney final language approval; 2) Authorize
the City Manager to approve and sign a Professional
Services Agreement between the City and BonTerra
Consulting consistent with their proposal dated May
22, 2002; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to approve
and sign a Professional Services Agreement between the
City and Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., consistent
with their proposal dated May 21, 2002.
G. Consider Modifications to City Sign Code to Allow
Certain Signs to Publicize Nonprofit Groups' Events.
Staff Recommendation: Refer the use of signs /banners
by Moorpark based nonprofit groups and use of public
rights -of -way for certain signs to the Planning
Commission as part of the prior action to review the
sign code.
H. Consider Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and
Objectives for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff
Recommendation: Approve Mission Statement, Priorities,
Goals and Objectives.
I. Consider City Co- Sponsorship of the Moorpark Rotary
Club's Civil War Reenactment. Staff Recommendation: 1)
Decline co- sponsorship; and 2) Authorize staff to
implement Options 1 and 2 in the agenda report.
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 5
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year
2001 -2002 - June 5, 2002.
Manual Warrants
Voided Warrants
Payroll Liability
Warrants
109387 - 109391
109365 & 109570 &
109571
109392 - 109399
$ 10,163.33
$ (8,816.60)
$ 11,851.75
Regular Warrants 109400 -
109511 &
$
28,134.08
109512 -
109560 &
$
10,223.90
109561 -
109617
$
995,562.23
Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register.
B. Consider Bids for the Construction of Modifications at
the Intersection of Miller Parkway and Peach Hill Road
to Facilitate U -Turn Traffic (Project 8032), Adoption
of a Resolution Amending the Budget to Fully Fund the
Project, and Recordation of a Deed for Certain
Additional Right -of -Way and Temporary Construction
Easements Required by the Project. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Approve the selection of Berry
Engineering Contractors, Inc., to construct the
subject project; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- ,
providing additional funding required for the project;
and 3) Direct the City Clerk to provide for the
recordation of the Deeds and Certificates of
Acceptance for the additional right -of -way and
temporary construction easement required for the
project. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
C. Consider Scope of Utility Relocation to be Undertaken
as a Part of the Realignment of Flinn Avenue (Project
8037) . Staff Recommendation: 1) Direct staff to
include the undergrounding of electrical lines in the
scope of work for the subject project, all other
utilities to remain in their current location unless
relocated at the sole expense of others; and 2) Direct
staff to prepare and record any required utility
easements prior to the vacation of existing Flinn
Avenue.
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 6
11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
D. Consider Rescheduling of Public Hearing Regarding
Establishment of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the
Downtown Area. Staff Recommendation: Reschedule the
Public Hearing for establishment of a Parking In -Lieu
Fee for the Downtown Area from June 5, 2002, to June
19, 2002.
E. Consider Loan Agreement Between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- ,
approving a Loan Agreement with the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency.
F. Consider Resolution Establishing the Appropriation
Limitation for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 for the City of
Moorpark at $14,627,654. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2002-
G. Consider One -Year Extension of Sunridge Landscape
Maintenance and the Venco Western Agreements. Staff
Recommendation: Authorize staff to extend the City's
Agreements with Sunridge Landscape Services and Venco
Western through June 30, 2003, at the existing
contractual rate.
H. Consider One -Year Extension of the City's Tree
Maintenance Agreement with West Coast Arborist. Staff
Recommendation: Authorize staff to extend the City's
tree maintenance agreement with West Coast Arborist
through June 30, 2003, with existing service fees.
I. Consider Authorizing Recordation of the Notice of
Completion for Apricot Room Repairs. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Accept the work as complete; 2)
Authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of
Completion for the project; and 3) Authorize the
release of the balance of payment, due upon
satisfactory clearance and thirty -five (35) days after
Notice of Completion records and completion of close-
out contractual obligations on the part of the
contractor.
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 7
12. ORDINANCES:
13. CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to
Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government
Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO21825)
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO22256)
E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited
Partnership and Messenger Investment Company, Inc., a
California Corporation vs. The City of Moorpark and
City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No.
SCO23388)
F. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City
Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative
Services, Director of Community Development, Director
of Community Services, and Director of Public Works.
G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Employee Organization: Service Employees International
Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998
City Council Agenda
June 5, 2002
Page 8
13. CLOSED SESSION: (continued)
H. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Unrepresented employees: Assistant City Manager,
Director of Administrative Services, ATCM /City Clerk,
Director of Community Development, Director of
Community Services, Director of Public Works,
Accountant I, Budget and Finance Manager, Information
Systems Supervisor, Planning Manager, Principal
Planner, Recreation Superintendent, and Senior
Management Analyst.
14. ADJOURNMENT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility
to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II).
ITEM 9eA*
C i v Coun611`:R c!'r1n.
AC 710- N:
Adrejed go --
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL�,,.j Zccz - ja-1te
AGENDA REPORT BSS:
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works`
DATE: May 24, 2002 (CC Meeting 6 -5 -02)
SUBJECT: Consider Final Review and Changes to the Engineer's
Report for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment Districts, Adoption of a Resolution
Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year 2002/2003,
and Adoption of a Resolution Amending the FY 01/02
Budget to Fully Fund Certain Landscaping and Lighting
Costs
SUMMARY
This presents for approval a Resolution making changes, if any, to
the Engineer's Report for the City's Landscaping and Lighting
Maintenance Assessment Districts and confirming the assessment and
levy amounts for Fiscal Year 2002/03. Also presented for approval
is a Resolution amending the FY01 /02 Budget to fully fund certain
lighting and landscaping costs.
BACKGROUND
On February 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002-
1944 directing the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the
City's Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts
for FY 02/03. On May 15, 2002, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 2002 -1972 approving that report and setting June 5,
2002, as the date of a public hearing to consider the approval of
the assessment and levy amounts provided for in said report.
DISCUSSION
A. History
In 1984, a Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance Assessment
District (AD 84 -2) was created to fund costs associated with
citywide street lighting and landscape maintenance. This was a
successor to the District enacted by the County of Ventura
prior to the incorporation of the City.
AD-02-03—approve 0 i v." 0( A
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 2
In 2001, three (3) new Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance
Assessment Districts (AD01 -1, AD01 -2 & AD01 -3) were formed at
the request of the owner / developer of the affected
properties.
B. Annual Review
As part of the annual budget process, the City Council
considers whether or not to renew the subject Assessment
Districts and levy assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. In
preparation for that consideration, it is necessary to prepare
an Engineer's Report setting forth certain relevant information
pertaining to such an action.
C. Citywide Landscaping & Lighting
Assessment District AD84 -2 provides for the levy of an
assessment upon all of the parcels in the City, to fund street
lighting energy and maintenance costs. There is also a separate
assessment to fund maintenance and improvement costs for
certain designated parkways and medians throughout the City. In
addition, a number of Zones of Benefit have been established
which provide for an additional assessment upon the lots within
those Zones, to fund the maintenance and improvement of certain
designated landscaped areas and drainage facilities located
within or adjacent to those Zones. These assessments are
proposed to be levied again for FY 2002/03.
D. Other Districts
As stated above, certain other
established to fund landscape
improvements within or adjacent
ease of identification, these
the subject Engineer's Report,
• AD01 -1 (Wilshire Builders):
• AD01 -2 (Toll Bothers):
• AD01 -3 (Cabrillo):
E. Combined Report
assessment districts have been
and drainage maintenance and /or
to certain specific areas. For
districts have been renamed in
is follows:
District 14
District 15 and
District 16.
The Engineer's Report prepared for this matter is a "combined"
report which fully addresses all of the above mentioned
Assessment Districts. Copies of that Engineer's Report were
provided to the City Council prior to the May 15th City Council
meeting. Although additional copies have not been re-
distributed, additional copies may be obtained from the Public
Works Department.
AD 02- 03_ approve
�! +t'�:
�D 2
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 3
F. Changes to the Engineer's Report
It is recommended below that the City Council approve certain
minor changes to the Engineer's Report. The recommended changes
are set forth in Exhibit 1. These changes are not of a
substantive nature and are only being recommended in order to
clarify certain language in the report.
G. Improvements to be Maintained
The improvements and maintenance funded by the Assessment
Districts is generally described as follows:
• Citywide District:
a. Street Lighting: Street lighting energy and maintenance
costs.
b. Landscape Maintenance: The maintenance of certain
designated parkways and medians.
c. Zones of Benefit:
1 Pecan Ave. [T -2851]
2 Steeple Hill Area [T -2865]
► Landscape Maintenance
► Drainage Maintenance
► Tierra Rejada Rd. Parkway Improvement
3 Buttercreek /Peppermill [T -3032]
4 Williams Ranch Rd. [T -3274]
5 Pheasant Run Area [T -3019 & T -35251
► Landscape Maintenance
► Drainage Maintenance
6 Inglewood St. [T -3306]
7 Moorpark Business Park (L. A. Ave & Gabbert Rd.)
8 Home Acres Buffer
9 Moorpark Industrial Park (Condor Dr.)
10 Mountain Meadows (PC -3)
► Landscape Maintenance
► Drainage Maintenance
11 Alyssas Ct. [T -4174]
12 Carlsberg Specific Plan Area
13 Unassigned
• Other Districts
14 Wilshire Builders [T -5201]
15 Toll Brothers [T -4928]
16 Cabrillo [T -5161]
► Landscape Maintenance
► Drainage Maintenance
H. Method of Assessment
The method used to establish the assessment amounts is set
forth in the Engineer's Report. This method (benefit spread
formula, etc.) is unchanged from prior years.
AD_02- 03_approve f1fb
Cr 11
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 4
I. FY 2002/03 Assessment Amounts
The assessment
amounts proposed
for FY 02/03, as
set forth in
the Engineer's
, are summarized as follows:
_
_Report
_
Landscape &
Landscape Maint.
Drainage Maint.
Total
Assessment
Assessment _-
i Description
As stunt ($)
- r --
Number ; Amnt ($) _
----- - - - --- --
- Number !_ Amnt ( Y
( Street i,iahtina
215.762 4
20.84
Citywide Landscaping -- 160, 398_ _ _— I 13:18_; —
Sub- Total _ 376, 160: _34 02 — —
1: Tract 2852 __ -----_9 7021 _ 75 :— 129.36 —_
2: Tract 2865 73 839 - _ 574 116.46 48 ! 145.64
3_ _Tract 3032 _3079 _ _265 — 11_62 1
4: Tract 3274 ! 6,383 129 ,_ - _ 49_48 _ —
5: Tracts 3019/3025 ___ 23840 _ 142 10756 ! 75 i 114.22
I i
6 : Tract 3306 924 ! 22 42 . 00 !_ ___ — ........ -__ - _______-
- - ------- - - -- -- - - -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- -
7: L A @ Gabbert 11 298 91.74 A. _123.151 _ _
8: Buffer-C i _ _ 7166 9 ! _ 4 9 8 — 15.4 0 - __- ------ _ ----- -----
Buffer -Home Acres -__ 7 574 201 �- — 37.68 !
9: Condor Drive ! 1,356 1 49.44 Ai 27.43 _ i
10: Mt Meadows -S P - -��--- - 2 0 529
0 , _. __-- -�---- -__ —_. --- ----- __ -- -- _ __—
1 7751 76.54 669 87.38
11: Tract 4174 3,040 ' 9 _78 !_
12: Carlsbera 235,225. 5361 408.941
4: Wilshire 1205 10 - 120.48:
--------- ----- -------- - - - - -- r-- - - - - -- --.--- - -- - - - --
5_, Toll Bros_, _ _ — _470,629 _216! * *1,452_56;
,6-:---Cabrillo - - - - -- - 10,5761 . _.. ....... 0 ! - - -- --------- - - - - -- 0- -! ---- - - - - -5
Total: 1.443,029:
A = per acre
** Plus Assessment on Golf Course Property
J. Cost of Livinq Adiustment
Pursuant to language set forth in the formation documents for
Zone 12 and District Nos. 14, 15 and 16, these annual
assessment may be increased annually, in accordance with a
specific formula, to cover cost -of- living increases. The
assessments for these Zones / Districts set forth in the
Engineer's Report, include that COLA adjustments.
K. Improvement Reserve Ceilin
This year's Engineer's Report provides for the establishment of
a Capital Reserve Account for each Zone or District. The
Report also provides that should it be projected that the
Capital Reserve Account for any Zone or District will exceed an
amount equal to three (3) times the annual operating budget for
that Zone or District, the amount of the assessment shall
remain unchanged but the amount of that assessment to be levied
upon the affected properties shall be reduced to an amount
AD_02- 03_approve
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 5
determined by the Assessment Engineer to be sufficient to fund
the program for the next year.
The projected year -end Capital Reserve Fund Balance for Zone 11
will exceed the above mentioned ceiling. Accordingly, it is
recommended below that the amount of the per lot assessment
[$337.78] to be levied upon each parcel within Zone 11, should
only be $33.78 per lot.
L. Assessment Amounts Unchanged
Except as noted above, the assessment amounts set forth in the
subject Engineer's Report are the same as the assessments
levied last year. Any action to otherwise increase these
assessments may not be taken without first seeking approval of
such an increase via a mail ballot prepared and processed in
accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218.
M. FY 2001/02 & FY 2002/03 Fund Deficits
Attached as Exhibit 2 are charts showing fund activity for all
Assessment Districts for FY 99/00 through FY 02/03. Page 3 and
4 of the Exhibit show projected fund activity for the current
fiscal year and for next fiscal year. It is anticipated that a
number of those funds will show a year -end deficit for FY
01/02, and that FY 02/03 expenditures will exceed revenues. A
summary of those projected deficits is as follows:
FY 01/02
Fund
2300: Lighting
2305: Zone 5 [US]
2307: Zone 7
2309: Zone 9
FY 02/03
Fund
2300: Lighting
2300: Landscaping
2303: Zone 3
2305: Zone 5 [US]
2306: Zone 6
2307: Zone 7
2309: Zone 9
2310: Zone 10 [US]
AD-02-03—approve
Beginning
$250,000.00
($34,238.00)
FY01 /02
Balance
Revenue
Expenses
Proj. End. Bal.
($11,076.00)
$217,132.00
$245,000.00
($38,944.00)
($13,596.00)
$23,340.00
$38,241.00
($28,497.00)
($260.00)
$11,298.00
$14,104.00
($3,066.00)
($7.00)
$1,350.00
$2,200.00
($857.00)
Total ($24,939.00)
$253,120.00
$299,545.00
($71,364.00)
FY02 /03
Revenue Expenses Projected Deficit
$215,762.00
$250,000.00
($34,238.00)
$160,398.00
$218,798.00
($58,400.00)
$3,179.00
$4,100.00
($921.00)
$23,340.00
$46,300.00
($22,960.00)
$924.00
$1,370.00
($446.00)
$11,298.00
$13,770.00
($2,472.00)
$1,350.00
$2,335.00
($985.00)
$194,880.00
$255,181.00
($60,301.00)
Total $611,131.00
$791,854.00
($180,723.00)
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 6
N. Fund Transfers
1. FY 01102: It is recommended below that the City Council
adopt a Resolution amending the FY 01/02 Budget, by
appropriating monies from the General Fund and the Gas Tax
Fund, to be transferred into certain of the Assessment
District Funds which are projected to show a FY 01/02 year-
end deficit, as generally described in Section M above. It
is recommended that the street lighting deficit be funded by
the Gas Tax Fund, and that the landscaping deficits be
funded fifty percent (50 %) by the Gas Tax Fund and fifty
percent (50 %) by the General Fund. A summary of that
recommended action is as follows:
To Be Transferred to:
Fund
2300: Street Lighting
2305: Zone 5 [US]
2307: Zone 7
2309: Zone 9
Total
From
Gas Tax Fund
$40,000
$15,000
$1,550
$500
$57,050
From
General Fund
$0
$15,000
$1,550
$500
$17,050
Total
$40,000
$30,000
$3,100
$1,000
$74,100
2. FY 02103: It is also recommended below that the City Council
direct staff to prepare a Budget amendment in June of 2003
funding the then projected Assessment District Fund
deficits, as generally described in Section M above, in a
like manner. A summary of estimated amounts required by
that future action is as follows:
To Be Transferred to:
From
From
Fund
Gas Tax Fund
General Fund
Total
2300: Street Lighting
$35,000
$0
$35,000
2300: Landscaping
$30,000
$30,000
$60,000
2303: Zone 3
$500
$500
$1,000
2305: Zone 5 [US]
$11,500
$11,500
$23,000
2306: Zone 6
$250
$250
$500
2307: Zone 7
$1,250
$1,250
$2,500
2309: Zone 9
$500
$500
$1,000
2310: Zone 10
$30,500
$30,500
$61,000
Total $109,500
$74,500
$184,000
O. Possible New District
The above Fund deficits were briefly discussed in the May 15th
staff report. At that meeting the City Council directed staff
to initiate efforts necessary to consider the establishment of
a new assessment district to address this funding shortfall. It
is anticipated that a report on this matter will be presented
to the City Council within six (6)months.
AD_02- 03 _approve C� 0-1, -n
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts
Confirm Assessments
May 24, 2002
Page 7
P. Public Hearing
The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments. Per
Resolution No. 2002 -1972, the public hearing to consider the
levy of the subject assessments for FY 2002/03 was set for June
5, 2002. A copy of that Resolution, which served as the public
hearing notice, was published and posted in accordance with the
requirements of law.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote)
It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council open the
public hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and
then take the following actions:
1. Approve the changes to the Engineer's Report set forth in
Exhibit 1.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- (Exhibit 3) making certain
changes to and confirming the assessments for Fiscal Year
2002/03.
3. Direct staff that the amount of the assessment for Zone 11 to
be levied upon the affected properties shall be reduced to
$33.78 per lot.
4. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- (Exhibit 4) amending the FY
01/02 Budget by appropriating monies from the General Fund and
the Gas Tax Fund to fund projected FY 01/02 Fund deficits for
street lighting and landscape maintenance as described in this
report.
5. Direct staff to prepare a similar Resolution in June of 2003
providing for a like fund transfer to fund the then projected
FY 02/03 year -end Fund deficits for street lighting and
landscape maintenance.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Exhibit 4:
AD_02 -03— approve
Changes to Engineer's Report
Fund Activity Charts
Resolution - Assessment Levy
Resolution - Budget Amendment
C- C 10101 7
Exhibit 1 - Page 1
Changes to Engineer's Report
A. Page 2:
2. Steeple Hill Area, Tract No. 2865: Cost for maintenance of specific landscaping areas
1 within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Springs Road; Tierra Rejada
landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra
Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barrett and Spring Road. Also,
additional assessment for improvements made to the parkway landscaping on the north side of
Tierra Rejada Road east and west of Southampton Road. This additional assessment will continue
until the cost of these improvements is repaid to the landscaping fund from which the
improvements were funded Tn�f,,addit ion-fit
he cost' ofn�ainmrng ceralntirauigedeteration ar>d
deb,�sIasmsis assessed toycetam loth within thiszone The obligation upon the lots within this
tract is pursuant to a condition of development.
5. Pheasant Run Area, Tract No. 3019 & 3525: Maintenance costs associated with
landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of
Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within tract Nos. 3019 and
3525. The Gest Tli "e. "se costs: aie spread to the 217 lots within the tracts. Iri addaton 'fiiTe
8. Home Acres Buffer Area: Maintenance costs associated with the buffer area at the west end of
the West Ranch area, is to be split 50 -50 between residential properties within the West Ranch
area and the area outside the City known as Home Acres. That portion of this Zone of Benefit
with the City consists of the residential area within TractW 4340, 4341, 4792 and a portion of
tract 4342. This area is bounded on the north by the Arroyo Simi, on the east by Tierra by Tierra
Rejada Road and the commercial property at the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain
Trail Street, on the south by tracts 4367, 4342 -5 and the City boundary and on the west by the
City boundary.
B. Page 3:
10. Mountain Meadows, PC -3: Maintenance costs associated with landscaping
within this area will be borne by all properties within the Mountain Meadows Planned
Community (PC -3). The landscaping to be maintained consists of the Peach Hill Water Linear
Park, the slope along the north side of Peach Hill Wash and the downstream flood control facility
located just east of Mountain Trail Street and certain parkways on Tierra Rejada Road. In
15. Toll Brothers, Tract 4928: Maintenance costs associated with approximately 10,200 lineal feet
including parkway, median and slope landscaping and related improvements along and adjacent
to the street right -of -way on Championship Drive ; certain slope landscaping along the
east side of Grimes Canyon Road; the Equestrian Trail running along the south side of
Championship«Diive and the east side of Grimes Canyon Road; and the Equestrian
Staging Area located on the east side of Grimes Canyon Road.
G;
Landscape I Lighting
Assessment Districts
Fund Activity: FY99100
Fund Description
2300 Lighting
Landscaping
2301 Zone 1
2302 Zone 2: LIS
Zone 2: Drains
Zone 2: Improvements
Prior Year Encumberance
2303 Zone 3
2304 Zone 4
2305 Zone 5: LIS
Zone 5: Drains
2306 Zone 6
2307 Zone 7
2308 Zone 8
2309 Zone 9
2310 Zone 10: LIS
Zone 10: Drains
2311 Zone 11
2312 Zone 12
2313 Zone 13
Sub -Total AD 84 -2
2314 A001.1 Wilshire Builders
2315 AD01.2 Toll Bras
2316 AD01.3 Cabrillo
Total IBI
Beginning
Rev.
Exp.
Balance
Code
Assmnt
11,659
3100
208,131
100,320
3102
148,761
356,892
111,979
2,035
3102
9,653
28,466
3102
65,902
1,514
3103
1,400
22,232
3101
6,220
73,522
52,212
5,000
373,928
(3,513)
57,212
Page 1 of 4
[File: adfunds 02 031
51612002
648
Total
Exp.
57
Total Available
Less
Ending
Misc Interest
Revenue
Code
Expenses
Less Expenses
Reserve
Balance
7,001 5,852
220,984
0
8901 225,324
7,319 (7,319)
4,183
152,944
7901
133,232
120,032
(120,032)
0
7,001 10,035
373,928
(3,513)
358,556
127,351
(127,351)
0
249
9,902
7901
4,877
7,060
(7,060)
0
3,699
69,601
7901
45,750
52,317
(52,317)
0
1,884
1,400
8902
185
2,729
(2,729)
0
7901
6,220
8019
0
28,452
28,452
83,498
(55,046)
28,452
0 3,699 77,221
45,935
5,000
5,000
88,498
(55,046)
33,452
45,935
648
3102
3,063
57
3,120
7901
2,464
1,304
(1,304)
0
(3,583)
3102
6,350
0
6,350
7901
4,470
(1,703)
110,534
(1,703)
4,930
3102
23,219
262
23,481
7901
24,898
3,513
(3,513)
0
647
3103
497
23,716
0
0 262
497
8902
160
25,058
984
(984)
0
5,577
23,978
4,497 (4,497)
0
886
3102
919
933
3102
11,142
1,772
3102
15,073
1,634
3102
1,343
103,615
3102
195,812
6,919
3103
7,214
203,026 0
110,534
550
3102
3,024
0
3102
0
6,329
3102
707,723 7,001
291,506
0 1 3102
0 3102
0 3102
291,506 1 707,723
Note A: To be adjusted in FY01102
Note B: Does not include Prior Year Encumberance [$5,0001 from Fund 2302
52
971
7901
786
92
11,234
7901
9,831
210
15,283
7901
11,121
84
1,427
7901
1,875
6,682
202,494
7901
175,710
0
7,214
8902
2,500
6,682
209,708
(278)
178,210
99
3,123
7901
1,091
2
2
7901
280
281
281
7901
1,180
21,804
736,528
645,734
0
7901
1,884
0
7901
126
0
7901
0
7,001 21,804 1 736,528 1 647,744
1,071
(1,071)
0
2,336
(2,336)
0
5,934
(5,934)
0
1,186
(1,186)
0
130,399
(130,399)
0
11,633
(11,633)
0
142,032
(142,032)
0
2,582
(2,582)
0
(278)
(278)
5,430
5,430
382,300
(350,399)
31,901
(1,884)
(1,884)
(126)
(126)
0
0
380,290 (350,399) 1 29,891
�a
Landscape I Lighting
Assessment Districts
Fund Activity: FY00101
Page 2 of 4
[File: adfunds 02 031
51612002
Total [BI 380,289 931,904 42,955 31,182 1,006,041 861,345 524,985 (521,387) 3,598
Note A: To be adjusted in FY01102
Note B: Does not include Prior Year Encumberance 155,0001 from Fund 2302
Revenue
Beginning
Rev.
Total
Exp.
Total Available
Less
Ending
Fund
Description
Balance
Code
3100
Assmnt
208,886
Misc
1,080
Interest
Revenue
Code
Expenses
Less Expenses
Reserve
Balance
2300 Lighting
7,319
209,966
8901 228,361
(11,076)
(11,076)
Landscaping
120,032
3102
145,391
26,875
9,721
181,987
7901
175,500
126,519
(126,519)
0
127,351
354,277
27,955
9,721
391,953
403,861
115,443
(126,519)
(11,076)
2301
Zone 1
7,060
3102
9,657
597
10,254
7901
7,815
9,499
(9,499)
0
2302
Zone 2: LIS
52,317
3102
69,257
5,657
74,914
7901
54,692
72,539
(72,539)
0
Zone 2: Drains
2,729
3103
652
652
8902
A
3,381
(3,381)
0
Zone 2: Improvements
28,452
3101
3,563 A
3,563
8019
3,543
28,472
0
28,472
83,498
73,472
0
5,657
79,129
58,235
104,392
(75,920)
28,472
Prior Year Encumberance
5,000
5,000
0
5,000
88,498
109,392
(75,920)
33,472
58,235
2303
Zone 3
1,304
3102
3,064
93
3,157
7901
2,738
1,723
(1,723►
0
2304
Zone 4
(1,704)
3102
6,353
39
6,392
7901
5,375
(687)
(687)
2305
Zone 5: LIS
3,513
3102
23,237
173
23,410
7901
40,519
(13,596)
(13,596)
Zone 5: Drains
984
3103
489
489
8902
A
1,473
(1,473)
0
4,497
23,726
0
173
23,899
40,519
(12,123)
(1,473)
(13,596)
2306
Zone 6
1,071
3102
920
95
1,015
7901
884
1,202
1,202
2307
Zone 7
2,336
3102
11,147
118
11,265
7901
13,861
(260)
(260)
2308
Zone 8
5,934
3102
15,080
445
15,525
7901
13,349
8,110
(8,110)
0
2309
Zone 9
1,186
3102
1,344
68
1,412
7901
2,605
(7)
(7)
2310
Zone 10: LIS
130,399
3102
193,857
8,789
202,646
7901
231,589
101,456
(101,456)
0
Zone 10: Drains
11,633
3103
7,098
7,098
8902
679
18,052
(18,052)
0
142,032
200,955
0
8,789
209,744
232,268
119,508
(119,508)
0
2311
Zone 11
2,582
3102
3,025
217
3,242
7901
950
4,874
(4,874)
0
2312
Zone 12
(278)
3102
228,884
4,752
233,636
7901
68,020
165,338
(165,338)
0
2313
Zone 13
5,430
3102
322
322
7901
5,752
(5,752)
0
Sub -Total AD 84.2
931,904
27,955
31,086
850,480
382,299
990,945
522,764
(518,716)
4,048
2314
A001.1 Wilshire Builders
(1,884)
3102
5,000
47
5,047
7901
3,613
(450)
(450)
2315
A001.2 Tall Bros
(126)
3102
5,000
49
5,049
7901
3,664
1,259
(1,259)
0
2316
A001 -3 Cabrillo
0
3102
5,000
0
5,000
7901
3,588
1,412
(1,412)
0
Total [BI 380,289 931,904 42,955 31,182 1,006,041 861,345 524,985 (521,387) 3,598
Note A: To be adjusted in FY01102
Note B: Does not include Prior Year Encumberance 155,0001 from Fund 2302
4�
Landscape I Lighting
Assessment Districts
Fund Activity: FYO1102
Page 3 of 4
[File: adfunds_02 031
51612002
2314 A001.1 Wilshire Builders
(450)
3102 1,180
1,180
7901 426
Revenue
304
2315 AD01.2 Tall Bros
1,259
3102 461,354 12,000
473,354
7901 0
474,613
474,613
2316 A001.3 Cabrillo: LIS
Beginning
Rev.
3,260
7901 0
4,672
Total
Exp.
Total Available
Less
Ending
Fund
Description
Balance
Code
3100
Assmnt
217,132
Misc
Interest
Revenue
Code
Expenses
Less Expenses
Reserve
Balance
2300 Lighting
(11,076)
217,132
8901 245,000
(38,944)
(38,944)
Landscaping
126,519
3102
159,803
5,500
165,303
7901
207,232
84,590
84,590
115,443
382,435
45,646
0
45,646
376,935 0 5,500
452,232
2301
Zone 1
9,499
3102
9,702
500
10,202
7901
4,074
15,627
15,627
2302
Zone 2: LIS
72,539
3102
66,957 A
(3,189)
4,200
67,968
7901
59,851
80,656
80,656
Zone 2: Drains
3,381
3103
652
652
8902
1,192
2,841
2,841
Prior Year Encumberance
5,000
(5,000)
(5,000)
8019
0
0
0
Zone 2: Improvements
28,472
3101
6,230
5,000
11,230
8019
53,649
(13,947)
(13,947)
109,392
74,850
69,550
0
69,550
73,839 (3,189) 4,200
114,692
2303
Zone 3
1,723
3102
3,079
100
3,179
7901
2,876
2,026
2,026
2304
Zone 4
(687)
3102
6,383
100
6,483
7901
5,548
248
248
2305
Zone 5: LIS
(13,596)
3102
23,340
23,340
7901
38,241
(28,497)
(28,497)
Zone 5: Drains
1,473
3103
500
500
8902
4
1,969
1,969
(12,123)
23,840
(26,528)
0
(26,528)
23,840 0 0
38,245
2306
Zone
1,202
3102
823
823
7901
1,039
986
986
2307
Zone 7
(260)
3102
11,298
11,298
7901
14,104
(3,066)
(3,066)
2308
Zone 8
8,110
3102
15,243
300
15,543
7901
14,843
8,810
8,810
2309
Zone 9
(7)
3102
1,350
1,350
7901
2,200
(857)
(857)
2310
Zone 10: LIS
101,456
3102
194,280
4,300
198,580
7901
188,792
111,244
111,244
Zone 10: Drains
18,052
3103
7,252
7,252
8902
1,300
24,004
24,004
119,508
205,832
135,248
0
135,248
201,532 0 4,300
190,092
2311
Zone 11
4,874
3102
3,040
200
3,240
7901
1,106
7,008
7,008
2312
Zone 12
165,338
3102
238,448
13,200
251,648
7901
99,812
317,174
317,174
2313
Zone 13
5,752
3102
0
100
100
7901
5,852
5,852
527,764
990,823
577,724
0
577,724
Sub -Total AD 84.2
965,512 (3,189) 28,500
940,863
2314 A001.1 Wilshire Builders
(450)
3102 1,180
1,180
7901 426
304
304
2315 AD01.2 Tall Bros
1,259
3102 461,354 12,000
473,354
7901 0
474,613
474,613
2316 A001.3 Cabrillo: LIS
1,412
3102 2,860 400
3,260
7901 0
4,672
4,672
ADO 1 -3 Cabrillo: Drains
3103 7,500
7,500
8902 0
7,500
7,500
1,412
10,760
12,172 0
12,172
10,360 0 400
0
Total I 529,985 I 1,438,406 (3,189) 40,900 I 1,476,117 I 941,289 I 1,064,813 0 I 1,064,813
Note A: Correction to FYO(
`; pI
c.
Exhibit 2
Landscape I Lighting
Page 4 of 4
Assessment Districts
IFile:
adfunds_02 031
Fund Activity: FY02103
51612002
Revenue
Beginning
Rev.
Total
Exp.
Total Available
Less
Ending
Fund
Description
Balance
Code
3100
Assmnt
215,762
Misc
Interest
Revenue
Code
Expenses
Less Expenses
Reserve
Balance
2300 Lighting
(38,944)
215,762
8901 250,000
(73,182)
(73,182)
Landscaping
84,590
3102
160,398
160,398
7901
218,798
26,190
(26,190)
0
45,646
376,160
0
0
376,160
468,798
(46,992)
(26,190)
(73,182)
2301
Zone 1
15,627
3102
9,702
500
10,202
7901
5,040
20,789
(20,789)
0
2302
Zone 2: LIS
80X56
3102
66,209
3,000
69,209
7901
63,714
86,151
(86,151)
0
Zone 2: Drains
2,841
3103
1,400
1,400
8902
258
3,983
(3,983)
0
Zone 2: Improvements
(13,947)
3101
6,230
6,230
8019
0
(7,717)
(7,717)
69,550
73,839
0
3,000
76,839
63,972
82,417
(90,134)
(7,717)
2303
Zane 3
2,026
3102
3,079
100
3,179
7901
4,100
1,105
(1,105)
0
2304
Zone
248
3102
6,383
6,383
7901
6,300
331
(331)
0
0
2305
Zone 5: LIS
(28,497)
3102
23,340
23,340
7901
46,300
(51,457)
(51,457)
Zone 5: Drains
1,969
3103
500
500
8902
272
2,197
(2,197)
0
(26,528)
23,840
0
0
23,840
46,572
(49,260)
(2,197)
(51,457)
2306
Zone 6
986
3102
924
924
7901
1,370
540
(540)
0
2307
Zone 7
(3,066)
3102
11,298
11,298
7901
13,770
(5,538)
(5,538)
2308
Zone 8
8,810
3102
15,243
100
15,343
7901
13,387
10,766
(10,766)
0
2309
Zone 9
(857)
3102
1,350
1,350
7901
2,335
(1,842)
(1,842)
2310
Zone 10: LIS
111,244
3102
194,280
600
194,880
7901
255,181
50,943
(50,943)
0
Zone 10: Drains
24,004
3103
7,252
7,252
8902
3,261
27,995
(27,995)
0
135,248
201,532
0
600
202,132
258,442
78,938
(78,938)
0
2311
Zone 11
7,008
3102
304
300
604
7901
1,120
6,492
(6,492)
0
2312
Zone 12
317,174
3102
238,448
18,000
256,448
7901
116,274
457,348
(457,348)
0
2313
Zone 13
5,852
3102
0
7901
5,852
0
0
Sub -Total AD 84.2
962,102
0
22,600
1,007,332
577,724
984,702
555,094
(694,830)
(139,736)
2314
ADO 1 -1 Wilshire Builders
304
3102
1,180
1,180
7901
1,180
304
(304)
0
2315
ADO 1.2 Toll Bros
474,613
3102
461,354
30,000
491,354
7901
412,500
553,467
(553,467)
0
2316
ADO 1.3 Cabrillo: LIS
4,672
3102
2,860
1,000
3,860
7901
1,200
7,332
(7,332)
0
ADO 1.3 Cabrillo: Drains
7,500
3103
7,500
7,500
8902
9,280
5,720
(5,720)
0
12,172
10,360
0
1,000
11,360
10,480
13,052
(13,052)
0
1,064,813
1,488,596
1,431,492
1,121,917
(1,261,653)
Total
1,434,996 0 53,600
(139,736)
Exhibit 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENGINEER'S
REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND
ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2002/03 FOR THE CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1944, the City Council
ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the
City's Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment
Districts (the "Assessment Districts ") for fiscal year 2002-
03; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's
Report ( "Report ") was prepared by Shilts Consultants, Inc.,
Engineer of Work, in accordance with Section 22565, et.
seq., of the Streets and Highways Code and Article XIIID of
the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1972 the City Council
preliminarily approved the Engineer's Report for said
District and set a date for a Public Hearing; and
WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the
City Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to
be sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was
determined that the report should stand as the Engineer's
Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to
the aforesaid resolution, and that June 5, 2002, at the hour
of 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, was appointed
as the time and place for a hearing by this Council on the
question of the levy of the proposed assessment, notice of
which hearing was given as required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place the hearing
was duly and regularly held, and all persons interested and
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard,
and all matters and things pertaining to the levy were fully
heard and considered by the Council, and all oral statements
and all written protests or communications were duly heard,
considered and overruled, and this council thereby acquired
jurisdiction to order the levy and the confirmation of the
diagram and assessment prepared by and made a part of the
Engineer's Report to pay the costs and expenses thereof.
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The public interest, convenience and
necessity require that the levy be made.
SECTION 2. The Assessment Districts benefited by the
improvements and assessed to pay the costs and expenses
thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown
by a map thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk,
which map is made a part hereof by reference thereto.
SECTION 3. The Engineer's Report as a whole and each
part thereof, to wit:
(a) the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs
and expenses of maintaining the improvements and of the
incidental expenses in connection therewith;
(b) the diagram showing the Assessment Districts, plans and
specifications for the improvements to be maintained
and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective
lots and parcels of land within the Assessment
Districts; and
(c) the assessment of the total amount of the cost and
expenses of the proposed maintenance of the
improvements upon the several lots and parcels of land
in the Assessment Districts in proportion to the
estimated special benefits to be received by such lots
and parcels, respectively, from the maintenance, and of
the expenses incidental thereto;
are finally approved and confirmed.
SECTION 4. Final adoption and approval of the
Engineer's Report as a whole, and of the plans and
specifications, estimate of the costs and expenses, the
diagram and the assessment, as contained in the report as
hereinabove determined and ordered, is intended to and shall
refer and apply to the report, or any portion thereof as
amended, modified, or revised or corrected by, or pursuant
to and in accordance with, any resolution or order, if any,
heretofore duly adopted or made by this Council.
SECTION S. The assessment to pay the costs and expenses
of the maintenance of the improvements for fiscal year 2002-
03 is hereby levied. For further particulars pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,
reference is hereby made to the Resolution Directing
Preparation of Engineer's Report.
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 3
SECTION 6. Based on the oral and documentary evidence,
including the Engineer's Report, offered and received at the
hearing, this Council expressly finds and determines (a)
that each of the several lots and parcels of land will be
specially benefited by the maintenance of the improvements
at least in the amount if not more than the amount, of the
assessment apportioned against the lots and parcels of land,
respectively, and (b) that there is substantial evidence to
support, and the weight of the evidence preponderates in
favor of, the aforesaid finding and determination as to
special benefits.
SECTION 7. Immediately upon the adoption of this
resolution, but in no event later than the third Monday in
August following such adoption, the City Clerk shall file a
certified copy of the diagram and assessment and a certified
copy of this resolution with the Auditor of the County of
Ventura. Upon such filing, the County Auditor shall enter on
the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of
land the amount of assessment thereupon as shown in the
assessment. The assessments shall be collected at the same
time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected
and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of
County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement
of the assessments. After collection by the County, the net
amount of the assessments, after deduction of any
compensation due the County for collection, shall be paid to
the City of Moorpark Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment Districts.
SECTION 8. Upon receipt of the moneys representing
assessments collected by the County, the County shall
deposit the moneys in the City Treasury to the credit of the
improvement funds previously established under the
distinctive designation of the Assessment Districts. Moneys
in the improvement funds shall be expended only for the
maintenance, servicing, construction or installation of the
improvements.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to
be filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this Stn day of June, 2002.
ATTEST: Patrick Hunter, Mayor
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
�;`.�ay....5
Exhibit 4
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE FY 01/02
BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR
TRANSFERS FROM THE GENERAL FUND [FUND 10001
AND THE GAS TAX FUND [FUND 26051 TO CERTAIN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS AS DEFINED HEREIN
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the
Budget for Fiscal Year 2001/02; and
WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City
Council requesting a budget increase in the aggregate amount of
$74,100; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof,
describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the
budget line item(s).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That a Budget amendment in the aggregate increase
of $74,100, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", is
hereby approved.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed
in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment:
Exhibit 'A': Appropriation and Budget Detail
'(�.
Resolution No. 2002 -
Exhibit "A"
A. Fund Allocation
Fund No.
Fund Name
Amount
1000
General Fund
17,050
2605
Gas Tax Fund
57,050
$0
Total
74,100
B. Budget Appropriation:
BUDGET NUMBER
BUDGETED
REVISION
NEW BUDGET
From:
1000.7900.0000.9820
$0
17,050
17,050
2605.8310.0000.9820
$0
57,050
57,050
Sub -Total
74,100
74,100
To.
2300.3720
$0
40,000
40,000
12305.3720
$0
30,000
30,000
2307.3720
$0
3,100
3,100
2309.3720
$0
1,000
1,000
Sub -Total
74,100
74,100
Approved as to form:
ITEM Pr . .
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst k t.•
SUBJECT: David Mullinax, Regional Representative, League of California Cities
DATE: May 31, 2002
CC: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manager
David Mullinax, Regional Representative, League of California Cities, will make a presentation on
"Grassroots Network and LOCAL (Leave Our Community Assets Local) Coalition Activities" at the
June 5, 2002 City Council Meeting.
Last fall, the League launched a grassroots network to promote significant city issues, such as fiscal
reform and local control. Fourteen regional representatives were hired to help the League's 16
divisions and 477 cities advance priority legislation. The goal is to heighten awareness of city issues,
making state lawmakers more accountable back home.
Regional representatives arrange meetings with legislators, plan news conferences, organize letter
writing and media campaigns, coordinate activities with community groups, and provide periodic
legislative updates.
To further these efforts, Mr. Mullinax would like to meet with each of you individually for about 15
minutes on June 5, 2002. Please let me know if you are available, and what time you prefer, by June 3,
2002. I will confirm the arrangements via e-mail.
If you have questions, please call me at 517 -6247.
Better Cities —A Better tiff
Leaque of California pities
L.O.C.A.L. Coalition Formed to Protect Local Revenues
In State Budget Fight
The League of California Cities is continuing its alliance with the California State
Association of Counties (CSAC) and the California Special Districts Association
(CSDA) in the fight to protect local revenues. After deciding to postpone a ballot
measure for this election cycle, all three levels of local government have united to
stage a multi- faceted effort to protect local government services.
Under the acronym LOCAL (Leave Our Community Assets Local) the League
and its counterparts will be actively engage in seeking the support of legislators,
third party coalition members and citizens at large in what is sizing up to be a
protracted budget fight in Sacramento.
This unprecedented alliance has come together under some key principles,
including; the fundamental notion that essential local services should not be
sacrificed to solve state budget problems, local taxes paid by Californians should
stay in the community to fund local services and that local governments are
already doing their part to help solve the budget challenges. To this end, the
LOCAL Coalition will also identify areas where state government can help close
the budget shortfall without harming local governments.
In a very real sense, the League has entered a "campaign style" approach to this
budget fight. From the establishment of a statewide steering committee and
regional advisory boards throughout the state to the nuts and bolts of letter
writing and press conferences the LOCAL effort will engage all of the
constituencies of local government in a comprehensive and coordinated effort.
While our regional representatives have already begun outreach efforts to
various constituencies likely to be affected by any budget cuts - member efforts
will be paramount to our success. Although it is true that the League's Grassroots
Network provides us with an added advantage over many other interests in
Sacramento, our effectiveness will be measured only in so far as city leaders are
willing to get involved and take a stand.
LOCAL Legislative Action Days (May 15th and 16th) in Sacramento are a great
way to continue the momentum local government has begun to build. Members
from special districts, counties and cities throughout California will meet over a
two -day period to demonstrate commitment and resolve to the legislature that
quality of life is directly proportional to the quality of local government services
we provide.
Headquarters
Southern California Office
140-0 K Street
602 Last liuntingion Dr., Sui c C
Sacramento, CA 9:814
Monro\ia, CA 9 10 16
9i6.6 )8.8200
626305.1315
:AX 916.658.S.'_40
PAX 626.305..1 45
M E _143-1
LEAVE OUR COMMUNITY ASSETS LOCAL
T Dedicated to Protecting Funding for Police, Fire, Health
and other Essential LOCAL Services
STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES
Leave our Community Assets Local (LOCAL Coalition) has united around the growing imperative to
protect our local services by protecting local government revenues. The LOCAL Coalition will be actively
involved in this year's budget process to ensure that funding for essential local services is not
compromised. Following are some key principles that will guide the coalition:
1. Essential Local Services Should Not Be Sacrificed to Solve State
Budget Problems.
Police and fire protection. Emergency medical services. Hospital trauma care. Public health services.
Road repair and maintenance. Clean drinking water. Parks. Libraries. Senior Services. These are just
a few of the important local services that are provided by local governments in California. But now,
these services could be in jeopardy as state lawmakers seek to balance the state budget. Sacrifices
will be necessary to help close the budget gap, but our local services have been sacrificed enough.
State lawmakers should avoid taking revenues away from the local services we all rely on.
2. Local Taxes and Fees Paid by Local Residents Should Stay in the
Community to Fund Local Services.
Already, a large portion of taxes paid by local residents is used to fund state - controlled programs. Only
a small portion of these revenues is left under local control to fund essential services such as fire,
police and health services. These limited, locally controlled revenues should not be diverted to fix the
state's budget crisis.
3. Local Governments and Local Revenues are Already Part of the
State Budget Solution.
Since 1992, the last time the State incurred a major budget deficit, tens of billions of dollars have been
diverted from local governments to the state — now totaling nearly $5 Billion annually. Since that time,
the funding for essential local services, including police, fire, hospital and public health services, has
been stretched thin while demand for these services has increased. Our local services cannot
withstand further cuts.
4. State Government Should Balance the Budget Without Taking More
Money Away from Local Communities.
The Coalition is opposing measures that would take any more of our local funds away from police, fire,
emergency medical and other important local services. The coalition believes the state should
balance the budget...
Without cutting essential local services by taking local revenues or shifting revenues from
one local government to the other.
Without mandating additional programs or services on local governments without
reimbursing them for the costs.
Without imposing more of the financial responsibility on cities, counties or special districts
for the cost of programs jointly funded by the state and local governments. Cuts in certain joint
programs may be necessary. But the state should avoid any "cost- shifting" that increases the
local revenues required.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM 100 ID.
O c: D2
joi tct Srf -t..A ►�E�C Z�`C�-2 - IG?-77
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Direc
DATE: May 23, 2002 (City Council Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Adopting an Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for the City of Moorpark for the
Fiscal Year 2002 -2003.
i' !
On May 15, 2002 the City Manager presented to the City Council
his recommended Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for
the Fiscal Year 2002 -2003. The Council held a public meeting to
discuss the budget on May 22, 2002. State law requires adoption
of a budget prior to June 30, 2002.
DISCUSSION
On May 15, 2002 the City Manager presented his proposed
Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of
Moorpark. During deliberation of the proposed budget, the City
Council directed staff to make several changes to the budget.
These include:
1. Reduce the allocation for alternate energy projects and
research from $70,000 to $20,000 in the 11800" fund (General
Fund) ;
2. Eliminated $50,000 allocation for open space acquisition
(General Fund).
3. Increased funding for the Captain and Sergeant's Service
Club dues by $650.
r? el ar'. 4
Honorable City Council
May 23, 2002
Page 2
4. Increased funding for equipment maintenance by a total of
$4,130 (several different funds).
If the City Council concurs with the changes to the City
Manager's recommended budget as noted in this staff report,
staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution. New budget books have been prepared for your
information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote)
Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
Attachment: Resolution No. 2002-
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MOORPARK
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2002 -2003
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2002 the City Manager's Recommended
Budget for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 was submitted to the City
Council for its review and consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided the opportunity for
public comment at a public meeting held May 22, 2002, and
conducted detailed review of expenditure proposals; and
WHEREAS, as the result of the reviews and analysis,
expenditure proposals and revenue projections have been modified
as needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Operating and Capital Improvements Budget
for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 (beginning July 1, 2002) for the City
of Moorpark containing operating and capital expenditures and
anticipated revenues as identified in Exhibit "A" to this
resolution attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be
adopted as the City of Moorpark's Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to amend the
capital improvement budget for the 2002 -2003 fiscal year at the
conclusion of the 2001 -2002 fiscal year when a final accounting
of project costs during the 2001 -2002 year is complete and
continuing appropriations are determined as long as the total
project appropriation authorized by the City Council is not
exceeded.
of
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to approve
appropriation transfers within departments and within individual
funds as required to provide efficient and economical services,
as long as the total department appropriation and fund
appropriation authorized by the City Council is not exceeded.
SECTION 4. Except as otherwise provided in this
resolution, amendments to the appropriations in the Fiscal Year
2002 -2003 Operating and Capital Improvements Budget shall
require Council action by resolution.
SECTION 5. The City Manager is authorized to make such
emergency appropriations as may be necessary to address
emergency needs of the City, provided that the appropriation is
presented to the City Council at its next regular meeting for
ratification.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
n- n rR el
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 3
Exhibit A
Operating and Capital Improvements Budget
For the City of Moorpark
Fiscal Year 2002 -2003
Provided Separately
��.s1V1 � �• �j �
a € T
C>__ ... __
ACS_
Y.
Y.
MOORPARK CITY COUNC I Y.
Y.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert Director of Public Works
DATE: May 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 6 -5 -02)
SUBJECT: Consider Selection of a Consultant to Prepare a
Feasibility Report Pertaining to Efforts Required to
Seek a Prohibition of Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route
118 Between Route 23 and Route 34
nTgrTTSSTON
A. Background
• In 1989 the City investigated development of a request to
Caltrans for the establishment of a prohibition of truck
traffic through the City. No action was authorized to
pursue a formal application.
• In 1994, just prior to the completion of the Route 23 /
Route 118 Freeway Connector Project, the City again made a
request to Caltrans to restrict trucks through the City.
It was feared that the opening of the connector project
would cause truck traffic to increase. Caltrans again
provided the City with the guidelines for the submittal of
a formal application. Due to the rather extensive and
costly nature of that process no action was taken to
pursue that application.
• In 1999 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -1604
requesting that the California Transportation Commission
(CTC) direct Caltrans to initiate efforts necessary to
establish a truck prohibition through the City. Again we
were directed to develop and submit a formal application.
• In response to that direction, the City Council directed
staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
consultant services required to develop a formal application
to Caltrans for the establishment of the desired truck
prohibition.
• An RFP was prepared and sent to a number of consultants.
• No Proposals were received in response to that RFP.
• In January of 2000, the City Council authorized use of the
Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fund to fund this effort.
Truck-ban-0205
C. era $k 41\ 4 a a
Truck Prohibition
May 24, 2002
Page 2
B. Procedures and Requirements
In the report presented to the City Council in 1999, staff
summarized the process and requirements for the preparation and
processing of an application for a truck prohibition. That
summary (with certain updates) is attached as Exhibit 1.
Attached as Exhibit 2 is certain back -up information in that
regard.
C. Proposal
At the request of City staff, Parsons, a firm with experience
relevant to the subject matter, prepared a Proposal (Exhibit 3)
for the consulting services required to more fully analyze and
assess the process and requirements which are generally
described in Exhibit 1. The report Parsons proposes to provide
would estimate the level of effort and cost required to develop
and then manage the application process and related efforts.
The report would also evaluate the feasibility and likelihood
of achieving the truck prohibition and provide recommendations
in that regard. With this report in hand, the City Council
would be in a position to make an informed decision regarding
the chances of success and the commitment of further resources
to that end.
The quoted fee for these services is $19,958.28.
D. National Highway System (NHS)
The subject Highway segment has been designated as being on the
National Highway System (NHS). The purpose of the NHS is to
provide an interconnected system of principal arterial routes
which a) serve major population centers and travel
destinations, b) meet national defense requirements and c)
serve interstate and interregional travel.
The first task the Consultant would address would be to
determine if and how the desired Truck Prohibition could be
achieved, given the NHS designation. A preliminary report on
those findings and recommendations would be provided to the
City. If, on the basis of those findings, it appears that
success is unlikely, further effort on the Feasibility Report
could be suspended and the consultant contract terminated with
only expenditures to date. The estimated cost for this initial
effort is $3,512.61. Should the City Council direct that this
study be performed, the Consultant would be directed to perform
work on the NHS question only and defer work on the remainder
of the study unless and until otherwise directed.
Truck—ban-0205
Truck Prohibition
May 24, 2002
Page 3
E. Total Program Cost Estimate
The above described study would be Phase 1 of the efforts
required to achieve the desired Truck Prohibition. If
approved, the actual development of the application and related
environmental document, plus the efforts to manage the
submittal and follow -up efforts, would constitute Phase 2 of
these efforts.
The total cost of this program is unknown. One of the
objectives of the above study is to develop a more informed
cost estimate of those costs. The City Council is advised,
however, that total costs could range from $200,000 to
$400,000, or more.
G. Phase 1 Approval
Should the City Council direct that the Phase 1 study be
prepared, staff would proceed with the efforts necessary to
negotiate and execute an Agreement for these professional
services. If that effort is successful, the Agreement would be
signed by the City Manager and work would commence.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff to retain Parsons to perform the subject study in a
manner consistent with the parameters set forth in this report.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Truck_ban_0205
History
Letter from CTC
Proposal
C Zoe v0�5
Exhibit 1
Truck Restriction
Truck Restriction
Page 1
Report
Report Review Process
A. Response Letter
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a letter dated June 2, 1999, from the
California Transportation Commission, advising the City of the
process required for the submittal of a request for the
establishment of a truck prohibition.
B. Truck Restriction Report
A copy of the "Truck Restriction Report Checklist" is included
as a part of Exhibit 2. A summary of the required
justification criteria set forth in that Checklist is
summarized as follows:
• analysis of operational and safety issues, including the
preparation of a description of before and after conditions;
• analysis of environmental impacts and mitigation measures
for same [see below for details] ;
• description of future planned land uses;
• analysis of the impact on interstate and intrastate
commerce, including an analysis of the economic impact on
communities, shippers and trucking companies resulting from
increased travel;
• analysis and recommendations regarding alternative routes
[a draft Alternate Route Map is attached];
• review of comments received during the public hearing
process.
C. Environmental Document
The Truck Restriction Report must be accompanied by an
Environmental Document. It is believed that a Negative
Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be
sufficient. The process and requirements related to the
preparation and certification of the Environmental Document
are summarized as follows:
• prepare Initial Study;
• prepare draft Negative Declaration (including Mitigation
Measures) and Notice of Completion;
• submit draft Negative Declaration and Notice of Completion
to the State Clearinghouse;
• comments on the documents are received by the City and by
the State Clearinghouse -- comments received by the State
Clearinghouse will be forwarded to the City;
Truck—ban-0205
Exhibit 1
Truck Restriction
Truck Restriction
Page 2
Report
Report Review Process
• comments will very likely include comments from the
trucking industry and from the Caltrans Headquarters' Office
of Permits and Truck Studies (OPTS);
• conduct a public hearing on the Negative Declaration and
the proposed Truck Restrictions;
• provide responses to all written and oral comments -
develop additional mitigation measures if necessary;
• take action to approve or disapprove the Negative
Declaration;
• if approved, a Notice of Determination is filed;
• also if approved, a copy of the approval and all of the
final documents are forwarded to the OPTS.
• the OPTS will prepare its recommendations regarding the
approval or denial of the proposed Truck Restrictions and
forward same to the Office of the Director of Caltrans in
Sacramento;
• if OPTS recommends denial, it is presumed that the Director
would concur with that recommendation and would so notify
the City;
• if OPTS recommends approval of the requested Truck
Restrictions, it is presumed that the Director would concur
and so notify the City;
• if approved, the Resolution would be adopted and
appropriate signs would be installed.
D. Economic and Other Impacts
In addition to the issues outlined in the above mentioned
.Check List, the above documents would also discuss the
negative economic impacts of truck traffic upon local
businesses, and the negative impacts of truck traffic upon the
quality of life in our community.
E. Truck Restriction Application Review Process
A summary of the "Truck Restriction Process" is also attached
as a part of Exhibit 2. A re -cap of that process and the
related requirements is as follows:
• prepare draft Resolution;
• prepare draft Truck Restriction Report;
prepare draft Environmental Document;
• complete Environmental Document review process (see below);
• submit Report, Environmental Document and other supportive
documents to Caltrans District;
Truck_ban_0205 P� gN
Exhibit 1
Truck Restriction Report
Truck Restriction Report Review Process
Page 3
• application package, along with comments and
recommendations from the District, is forwarded to Caltrans
Headquarters in Sacramento;
• Headquarters' response is provided to Caltrans District.
• final approval or denial is forwarded to the local agency.
Truck—ban-0205
01
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT I REMEN. Executive Director
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
1120 N STREET. MS-52
P.O. BOX 942873
SACRAMENTO 942730001
FAX (916) 653 -2134
FAX (916) 654 -4364
(916) 6541245
June 2, 1999
Mayor Patrick Hunter
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dear Mayor Hunter:
GRAY DAMS
GOVERNOR
1\'Erd C Ei ♦ ED
J U P r, 11t'9c
'S fvJw
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
CITY OF MOORPARK
We have received your transmittal of Council Resolution No. 99 -1604 requesting that the
California Transportation Commission direct the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) to proceed with efforts necessary to prohibit trucks on State Route 118, between State
Routes 23 and 126.
In accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 21101, 35701, 35702, and related sections,
Caltrans has prepared an overview of the local agency truck restriction process (see enclosure).
This process requires a public review period and preparation of a Truck Restriction Report (see
Truck Restriction Report Checklist, enclosed). We recommend that you coordinate your
proposal with:
• Mr. Frank Quon, Caltrans District 7 Traffic Operations Division Chief, (213) 897 -0362
• Ventura County
• the City of Somis
• any other local agencies that may be affected by a truck restriction
For assistance in satisfying the requirements of the truck restriction process, please contact Mr.
Asif Haq, Chief, Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits at (916)654 -6099.
Sincerely,
""'L 4 T---
EDWARD B. SYLVESTER
Chairman
cc: Asif Haq, Caltrans
Harried Benouar, Caltrans
Stephen Maller, Caltrans
Enclosures (2)
cc. H CC , C rv� i 'to p uJ j F=! £3 C E% F! I&
s,1VESTEH. ChW'-=
—F.
HALUSEY
`
W. KELLOGG
ROGER A. KOZBEAG
DANA W. REED
ESTEBAN E. TORRES
ROBERT A. WOLF
ENATOR BETTY KARNETTE. Ex Officio
ASSEMBLYMAN TOM TORLAKSON. Ex OffMio
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT I REMEN. Executive Director
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
1120 N STREET. MS-52
P.O. BOX 942873
SACRAMENTO 942730001
FAX (916) 653 -2134
FAX (916) 654 -4364
(916) 6541245
June 2, 1999
Mayor Patrick Hunter
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dear Mayor Hunter:
GRAY DAMS
GOVERNOR
1\'Erd C Ei ♦ ED
J U P r, 11t'9c
'S fvJw
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
CITY OF MOORPARK
We have received your transmittal of Council Resolution No. 99 -1604 requesting that the
California Transportation Commission direct the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) to proceed with efforts necessary to prohibit trucks on State Route 118, between State
Routes 23 and 126.
In accordance with California Vehicle Code Sections 21101, 35701, 35702, and related sections,
Caltrans has prepared an overview of the local agency truck restriction process (see enclosure).
This process requires a public review period and preparation of a Truck Restriction Report (see
Truck Restriction Report Checklist, enclosed). We recommend that you coordinate your
proposal with:
• Mr. Frank Quon, Caltrans District 7 Traffic Operations Division Chief, (213) 897 -0362
• Ventura County
• the City of Somis
• any other local agencies that may be affected by a truck restriction
For assistance in satisfying the requirements of the truck restriction process, please contact Mr.
Asif Haq, Chief, Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits at (916)654 -6099.
Sincerely,
""'L 4 T---
EDWARD B. SYLVESTER
Chairman
cc: Asif Haq, Caltrans
Harried Benouar, Caltrans
Stephen Maller, Caltrans
Enclosures (2)
cc. H CC , C rv� i 'to p uJ j F=! £3 C E% F! I&
OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL AGENCY TRUCK RESTRICTION PROCESS
For State Highways in accordance with CVC Sections 21101, 35701, 35702, and their related sections
Local Agency Prepares a Draft Truck Restriction Ordinance Or Resolution.
The local agency initiates the review process for restricting trucks on a state highway by
preparing a draft ordinance or resolution and informing the appropriate Caltrans district
office of the proposed restriction. The ordinance or resolution must cite the CVC
Section providing the authority for the truck restriction. Caltrans districts should notify
the Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits in writing as soon as possible
after learning of a truck restriction proposal. Districts should request and forward copies
of draft ordinances or resolutions from the local agencies to the Office of Commercial
Vehicle Operations and Permits. These will also be forwarded to Headquarters Legal
and Environmental Programs for review.
2. Local Agency repares An Initial Study
The local agency prepares an initial study. The initial study provides the information
necessary to justify the proposed restriction and may also indicate if the proposed
restriction is subject to CEQA review. The initial study allows the preliminary submittal
of information by Caltrans, local agencies, California Highway Patrol staff, as well as
initial comments from the trucking industry, affected industries and citizen groups. It
should include the proposed restriction type, location, existing conditions, alternatives,
maintenance and safety considerations on the alternative route(s), any initial public
comment, and conditions that may involve further CEQA compliance.
3. Public Review And Comment Period.
During the public review period the local agency gives public notice of the proposed
truck restriction and public hearings may be advertised and held. All documentation
acquired to date, regarding the proposed truck restriction, should be available for public
review prior to and at the public hearing.
4. Local Agency Receives Comments And Prepares A Final Truck Restriction Report
The local agency considers all comments received. If the local agency still wants to
proceed with the proposed restriction, a final truck restriction report, including any
comment revisions and the draft restriction ordinance or resolution, is prepared and
forwarded to the Caltrans district office. The District Director forwards the report with
the District's recommendations to the Chief, Traffic Operations Program, at Caltrans
Headquarters.
The Traffic Operations Program Submits A Recommendation To The Director's
Office.
The Office of Commercial Vehicle Operations and Permits, Traffic Operations Program,
in cooperation with Caltrans Headquarters Environmental and Legal Programs, will
prepare a recommendation regarding the truck restriction and submit it to the Director's
Office.
6. The Director issues a written approval of the draft truck restriction
7. The local agency passes the final truck restriction ordinance or resolution
8. Restriction signs are erected and the restriction is enforced
t? � -r± °F
� %0
;L
TRUCK RESTRICTION REPORT CHECKLIST
Approval of requests for restrictions will be contingent upon the identification and documentation of any
impacts on highway safety and structural integrity, the environment and operational efficiency. This
checklist is presented as a guideline only. All of the items on this checklist may not be applicable to a
specific proposal.
I. COVER
The cover of the document clearly states the Caltrans District, County, Route and
postmile limits of the proposal. Any proposed local ordinance or resolution number
should also be placed on the cover.
II. PROPOSAL STATEMENT
The proposed restriction and references to specific codes, regulations and any local
ordinances or resolutions are clearly presented in the proposal statement. If exemptions to
general rules apply, cite appropriate statutory law or regulations.
III. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSAL
Depends on rationale: safety, noise, hazardous materials, air quality, bridge weight limit,
construction zones, seasonal operation, etc.
Analyses of present and future safety, operational (capacity, geometrics) and/or structural
r
adequacy supporting the restriction. A description of existing versus proposed conditions.
Supporting data tables, maps and/or photographs.
Analysis of environmental considerations for the restriction proposal with an explanation
of impacts and mitigation measures.
Existing and future planned land uses.
Analysis of the impact on interstate and intrastate commerce. Analysis of the economic
impact on communities, shippers and trucking companies due to increased travel
distances.
Analysis and recommendations of any alternative routes that can safely accommodate any
California legal commercial motor vehicles and serve the area in which such segment is
located.
Evidence of consultation with the local governments in which the segment is located as
well as the Governor or Governor's representatives of any adjacent State that might be
directly affected by such a restriction.
Results of any public hearings.
IV. APPENDICES
Copies of any draft local restriction ordinances or resolutions.
Copies of any supportive correspondence or documents for the restriction.
Minutes of public hearings. (This can be a cassette tape.)
*1,4q
' .31
C)
Cm)
ROUTE 118
TRUCK PROHIBITION
ALTERNATIVE ROUTE
PARSONS
100 West Walnut Street • Pasadena, California 91124 • (626) 440 -6100 • Fax: (626) 440 -6155 • www.parsons.com
Project Understanding
The City of Moorpark desires to prohibit non -local truck traffic on State Route 118 from
State Route 23 westerly to the intersection of State Route 118 and State Route 34 (Lewis
Road).
The City of Moorpark wishes to retain the services of a qualified professional to prepare
and submit to the City staff and subsequently the City Council, a Preliminary Report
assessing the feasibility of obtaining approval to prohibit non -local truck traffic along State
Route 118, within the limits previously described.
The Preliminary Report will determine whether or not the NHS System designation can
remain unchanged and in place with the establishment of the truck prohibition. if removal
of the NHS designation is a prerequisite to the establishment of a truck prohibition, the
Preliminary Report will include an explanation why and a description of the process,
requirements, and estimated costs related to the deletion of the subject highway segment
from the NHS System. Assuming a favorable determination on the NHS designation, the
Preliminary Report will also describe the process, requirements, and estimated costs to
complete the Truck Restriction Process.
Technical Approach and Scope of Services
The following lists the tasks required to complete the Preliminary Report. Each tasks is
described with an objective, an approach, and the deliverable.
Task 1.0 NHS Designation
Objective: Determine whether or not the NHS designation can remain unchanged and in
place with the establishment of the truck prohibition.
Approach: Parsons will research Caltrans and FHWA databases to determine which routes
are currently prohibiting truck traffic and whether or not the NHS designation on these
routes ever applied and /or still apply. Parsons will also conduct interviews with Caltrans
and FHWA staff involved with highway planning in order to fully understand the truck
prohibition process and the associated requirements and costs.
Deliverable: Summary of findings whether or not the NHS designation had an impact in
prohibiting trucks.
Task 2.0 Removal of the NHS Designation
-m
;r°s •f'! y �°a
PARSONS
100 West Walnut Street • Pasadena, California 91124 • (626) 440 -6100 • Fax: (626) 440 -6155 • www.parsons.com
Objective: If the removal of the NHS designation is required, determine why it is so and
the required process, requirements, and the associated costs.
Approach: Parsons staff will meet with Caltrans and FHWA planning staff to determine the
process, requirements, and the impacts associated with removing the NHS designation from
State Route 118, between State Route 23 and State Route 34.
Deliverable: A letter summarizing the reasons why the NHS designation can /or cannot
remain. If NHS designation cannot remain, Parsons will develop a schedule of activities
describing the process to remove the NHS designation and the associated costs.
Task 3.0 Describe the Truck Restriction Process
Objective: Assuming Task 1.0 and Task 2.0 do not reveal a fatal flaw, Parsons will
conduct a study to determine the impacts associated with proceeding forward with the truck
prohibition process.
Approach: Parsons staff will prepare a cost estimate to,
• Prepare Draft Truck Restriction Report
• Prepare Draft Environmental Document
• Complete the Environmental Review Process
• Complete the Truck Restriction Report
• Assist the City in preparing a recommendation to prohibit truck traffic on State
Route 118
Parsons staff will also prepare a Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) in
order to describe what technical studies will be required as part of the truck prohibition
process. As part of this report, Parsons will research the truck traffic that currently exist on
State Route 118 and use the existing truck traffic forecast information in order to identify
possible environmental impacts the redistribution of truck traffic will have on State Route
23, Highway 101, and State Route 34. Cost estimates to mitigate any adverse impacts will
also be included with the list mentioned above.
Deliverable: Cost estimates to complete the Environmental Review and the Truck
Prohibition Process.
Task 4.0 Prepare Preliminary Report
Objective: Prepare a preliminary report describing the need and purpose of the project, the
research done on the project, and a recommendation of whether or not to proceed with the
truck prohibition process.
UEJ
C1C 43,
PARSONS
100 West Walnut Street • Pasadena, California 91124 • (626) 440 -6100 • Fax: (626) 440 -6155 • www.parsons.com
Approach: Parsons staff will compile all the information obtained on the NHS designation,
the truck prohibition process, and the environmental review process. The report will
organize all the information in an easily readable report describing the NHS process, the
truck prohibition process, and identifying any possible constraints associated with
proceeding with the truck prohibition process. A preliminary cost estimate to process the
truck prohibition application and to mitigate any possible environmental impacts as
identified in the PEAR will also be included in the report. The Preliminary Report will
conclude with a recommendation of whether or not to proceed forward with the truck
prohibition process.
Upon completion of the report, Parsons staff will meet with City staff to discuss the finding
of the report and, upon approval from City staff, make a presentation to the City Council.
Deliverable: Preliminary report describing the,feasibility ofproceedingforward with the
truck prohibition process.
LiKi
4% s-,, *� r°
EXHIBIT B
TRUCK PROHIBITION STUDY - CITY OF MOORPARK
FEE ESTIMATE
IS TRANSPORTATION GROUP
LABOR
iJ MGR
RATE/ '
VELASOUEZ
HOURS
HOUR
HOWELL
'LAN.
$50.00
WESEMANN
)G. SPEC>
$59.65
CHANDER
24
0
0
64
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IIN
$0.00
STAFF
AL HOURS
$0.00
$0.00
Computer
0
0
0
0
SUB CONSULTANT TOTAL
Total $0.00
% of Fee 0.00%
GRAND TOTAL
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$19,958.28
RATE/ '
TOTAL
HOURS
HOUR
DIRECT LABOR
48
$50.00
$2,400.00
16
$59.65
$954.40
24
$58.05
$1,393.20
64
$35.12
$2,247.68
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
0
$0.00
$0.00
8
$25.00
$200.00
160
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
$7,195.28
OVERHEAD @ 146.99% x
DIRECT LABOR
$10,576.34
FEE @ 10%
$1,777.16
TOTAL (DL +OVHD +FEE)
$19,548.78
UNIT
UNIT RATE
TOTAL ODC
0
$15.00
$0.00
0
$12.00
$0.00
300
$0.37
$109.50
EST
$300.00
At Cost
$0.00
At Cost
$0.00
TOTAL ODC'S
$409.50
SUB CONSULTANT TOTAL
Total $0.00
% of Fee 0.00%
GRAND TOTAL
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$19,958.28
i
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Approving the Preliminary
Assessment Engineer's Report, the Parks and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District Levy
Amount, and Setting the Date for the Public Hearing
for June 19, 2002.
i
W.fgo
The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached
resolution, approving the Preliminary Assessment Engineer's
Report (provided under separate cover) which contains the
methodology and formula for apportioning the property
assessment. Additionally, the resolution identifies the date for
the Public Hearing to consider the levy of the assessment for FY
2002/03.
BACKGROUND
In July 1999, the City successfully established an assessment
district for the maintenance and improvement of City parks. The
District was initiated by the Council to provide funding in
place of AD 85 -1 (Park Maintenance Assessment District), which
was disbanded in July 1998 as a result of Proposition 218. The
current Maintenance District is based on a "special" assessment.
This means that the City assesses property owners for that
portion of park maintenance and improvement activities that
generate a "special" benefit. All activities that generate a
\\mor _pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley\Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03 ccagd.doc
C V V` C✓ 3 6
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 2
"general" benefit must be funded from non - assessment revenues
(typically General Fund and Park Improvement Fund).
The Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District
includes all existing 15 City parks. The amount of the
assessment levied to property may only increase by the Cost of
Living factor (CPI) for the Los Angeles Metropolitan area, and
not more than 3 percent in any year. In situations when the CIP
exceeds 3 percent, the remaining difference can be carried over
to the following year.
On February 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2002 -1942 indicating its intent to continue the assessment for
FY 2002/03 and directing the preparation of the Engineer's
Report. On that date, the City selected Shilt's Consultants to
prepare the report.
DISCUSSION
The City Council is being presented with the preliminary
Engineer's Report for consideration and approval. By approving
the Engineer's Report, the Council will be establishing the
assessment rate, the formula used to spread the assessment, and
the City's contribution (comprised of General Fund and Park
Improvement Fund [PIF])for the maintenance and improvement of
parks. The boundaries for the Parks and Recreation Maintenance
and Improvement District contain all properties within the
City's incorporated limits.
The Assessment District includes all existing 15 City parks. The
Engineer's Report contains a determination regarding the
percentage of benefit deemed "special" and the percentage deemed
"general ", generated from the maintenance and improvement of
City parks and recreation facilities. The percentage figure
identified by the Engineer is 25 percent "general" benefit and
75 percent "special" benefit. This percentage is then applied to
the total park maintenance budget. Under Proposition 218, the
City can only assess property owners for the 75 percent portion
of the budget related to "special" benefits. Although 75
percent is identified as providing "special" benefit, and
consistent with previous years, it is proposed that property
owners be assessed for only approximately 16 percent of the
total park maintenance budget. The City's FY 02/03 contribution
\\ mor _pri_sery \home_folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03
ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 3
of 84 percent is significantly higher than previous years
because of a number of park improvements proposed in the budget.
Additionally, the Report identifies all
by type. A value has been assigned for
with single family residential having a
for all other property types is assigned
equivalent value is based on a formula
number of people who could potentially
otherwise use a property. Specifically,
values as follows:
properties in Moorpark
each type of property,
value of 1.00. A value
based on the SFE. The
that uses the average
live on, work at, or
the Engineer finds SFE
Single Family Residential 1.00
Condominium
.80
Multi - Family Residential
.78
Mobile Homes
.65
Commercial
.70
Office
1.90
Shopping Center
.70
Industrial
.70
Self Storage or Parking Lot
.03
(per dwelling unit)
(per 1/5 of acre)
.. .,
In regards to undeveloped vacant property, the Engineer has
developed a three tiered rate structure. Vacant property will
be assessed at .25 of its an equivalent SFE (for residential,
industrial, commercial, etc.). Once a development application
and engineering plans have been submitted for vacant property,
it will be assessed at its SFE at a rate of .35 of the developed
rate, and vacant property for which development has been
approved will have a SFE equivalent of .65 of the developed rate
for that property type until fully developed.
Park Maintenance and Improvement Budget
The Engineer's Report addresses the estimated revenue to be
generated by the assessment (approximately $521,664) if the
assessment rate is approved as recommended. This is
approximately $21,000 more than was anticipated in FY 2001/02.
The report also identifies the non - assessment contribution,
which is noted in the Report as City Contribution (General Fund
and Park Improvement Fund). Consistent with Proposition 218, the
City covers all costs associated with park maintenance activity
expenditures that generate "general" benefits (these activities
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03
ccagd.doc
V �d'V' ty`.�4j�
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 4
comprise approximately 25 percent of the budget) . Additionally,
the City traditionally covers a significant portion of the cost
associated with expenditures that generate "special" benefits.
The remaining costs associated with \ \special" benefits
(approximately 16 percent) are covered by the revenue collected
from the assessed levy.
The proposed FY 2002/03 Park Assessment District budget figure
of $3,248,328 includes $1,055,027 for operations and $2,206,001
for capital improvements. Of the operational expenditures, it
is estimated that $521,664 will be funded from collected park
assessments. It is proposed that the remaining, approximately
$533,363 in operational expenditures, be funded by City funds,
including $26,000 from the equipment replacement fund. Of the
$2,206,001 in proposed capital improvement projects, $2,193,301
will be funded from the Park Improvement Fund and $12,700 will
be funded by the General Fund.
FY 2002/03 Park Asst.
District Budget Summary
Proposed
Expenditures
Proposed
Funding
Operations
$1,055,027
Capital Park Projects
$2,206,001
Total Expenditure Budget
$3,241,727
Assessment Levy
$521,664
Park Improvement Fund
$2,193,301
Equipment Replacement
Fund
$ 26,000
General Fund
$520,063
Total Revenues
$3,261,028
As stated above, there are capital improvement projects in the
proposed FY 2002/03 budget. Those projects are identified in
Attachment A to this Report along with their proposed funding
source.
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03
ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 5
Assessment Rate
The CPI for FY 00/01 was 3.7 percent. Since the approved
assessment has a CPI cap of 3 percent, the SFE was adjusted by
only 3 percent to $41.08. However, the approved assessment
language allows the City to carry over any difference in a CPI
that exceed 3 percent to the following year, as long as it
adheres to the cap in subsequent years. The CPI increase for FY
01/02 is 2.1 percent (January 2002 above January 2001).
Including the .7 percent difference from FY 00/01, the total
adjustment is 2.8 percent and the proposed SFE rate for the
02/03 budget year is $42.24.
This proposed SFE rate adjustment is reflected in the Engineer's
Report along with the proposed FY 2002/03 Budget. Based on this
action, the City's total non - assessment contribution would be
$2,739,364 ($2,193,301 Park Improvement Fund, $26,000 Equipment
Replacement Fund, and $576,454 General Fund) and total
assessment contributions would be $521,664. This represents a
ratio of 84 percent City funded and 16 percent assessment levy
funded, which is far greater than the established 250/75% split.
Without capital projects, the split would be 51 percent City
funded and 49 percent assessment levy funded - again, still
significantly above the established ratio.
Public Hearing
The continuation of the Parks Maintenance and Improvement
District and rate adjustment requires a public hearing to be
held prior to the annual levy of assessment for the purpose of
receiving input and to hear any protest to the proposed
assessment. Additionally, the Notice cites the assessment
amounts set forth in the Engineer's Report. The Notice will be
published and posted as required by law.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution approving the preliminary Engineer's Report and
assessment amount contained within, and setting the public
hearing date for June 19, 2002.
\\ mor _pri_sery \home_folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03
ccagd doc
ATTACHMENT A
FY 2001/02 CAPITAL PARK PROJECTS
FY 2002/03 Capital Park
Cost -
Cost -
Projects
P.I. Fund
G.F
AVCP
$20,000
Tennis Court Pavilion
-
__
Community Aquatic
$175,000
Facility (Design)
- --
--
Monument Sign for
$2,000
Memorial Apricot Grove
Replace — Tennis -- Court
- --
$7,000
Timers
-- -~
Restroom/ ^ Concession
$260,000
Facility Cont.
---------------------- - - - - -- - --
AVCP Phase II
---------- - - - - --
$1,490,000
------- - --- --
Campus Park
State Contract Fees
$301
Community Center Park
Playground Equipment
$57,000
Peach Hill Park
Stand Alone Play Equip.
$3,700
Miller Park
Replace Tennis Court
$2,000
Timers
Mountain Meadows Park
Playground Equip. _ - -
$98,000
Poindexter Park
Picnic Furniture
$4,000
Glenwood Park
Play Equipment & ADA
$11,000
Surfacing
Villa Campesina Park
Equipment
$50,000 -
^ - - -_
_Play
- - --
Half -Court Basketball
$20,000
Monument Sign
$6,000
Sub Total -
$2,193,301
Park Improvement Fund
112,700
\ \mor _pri_serv\ home- folders\MLindley\Assessment Dist \engineer report 2002 03 ccagd.doc
4r0 : f) A e
' ..s' 6./' r„i• .r hi
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK-, OF INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2002 -039 PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF
HEARING FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION
MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, by its Resolution No. 99 -1625, after receiving a weighted
majority of ballots in support of the proposed assessment, this Council ordered the formation of
and levied the first assessment within the City of Moorpark Parks and Recreation Maintenance and
Improvement District (the "Assessment District ") pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of
the California Constitution, and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Act "), Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500
thereof); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1942, the City Council ordered the preparation of an
Engineer's Report for the Parks and Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the
"District ") for fiscal year 2002 -03; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's Report was prepared by Shilts
Consultants, Inc., Engineer of Work, in accordance with 22565, et. seq., of the Streets and
Highways Code (the "Report") and Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk and the City Council has
reviewed the Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Report for "PARKS AND RECREATION MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ", on file with the City Clerk, has been duly
considered by the Moorpark City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and approved. The
Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under, and pursuant to,
the foregoing resolution.
SECTION 2. It is the intention of this Council to levy and collect assessments within the
Assessment District for fiscal year 2002 -03. Within the Assessment District, the existing and
proposed improvements, and any substantial changes proposed to be made to the existing
improvements, are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of public
\ \mor_pri_sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 -
Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 1 of 3
facilities, including but not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, park grounds, park facilities,
landscape corridors, ground cover, shrubs and trees, street frontages, playground equipment and
hardcourt areas, senior and community centers, drainage systems, lighting, fencing, entry
monuments, basketball courts, tennis courts, running tracks, other recreational facilities, security
guards, graffiti removal and repainting, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as
applicable, for property owned and maintained by the City of Moorpark. Installation means the
construction of recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as
grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage,
lights, playground equipment, play courts, recreational facilities and public restrooms.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements, including repair, removal, or
replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of
landscaping; and cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove
or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation or
lighting of any improvements, and water for irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of
any other improvements.
SECTION 3. The Assessment District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the
boundary map of the Assessment District on file with the City Clerk, and reference is hereby made
to such map for further particulars.
SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report for a full and detailed
description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and the proposed
assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. The
Engineer's Report identifies all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and
upon which an assessment will be imposed.
SECTION 5. The authorized maximum assessment rate for the Assessment District
includes an annual adjustment by an amount equal to the annual change in the Los Angeles Area
Consumer Price Index not to exceed 3 %. The authorized annual adjustment for fiscal year 2002-
03 is 2.8 %, which is equal to the change in the CPI from December 2000 to December 2001 plus
unused CPI changes from previous fiscal year assessments in excess of the 3% maximum annual
adjustment. Including the authorized annual adjustment, the maximum authorized and proposed
assessment rate for fiscal year 2002 -03 is $42.24 per single family equivalent benefit unit.
SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that on June 19, 2002, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m.
in the Council Chambers, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, the
Council will hold a public hearing to consider the ordering of the improvements and the levy of the
proposed assessments.
SECTION 7. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may file a
written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written
withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a
property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner.
\ \mor_pri_sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 -
Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 2 of 3
Such protest or withdrawal of protest should be mailed to Shilts Consultants, Inc., 2300 Boynton
Ave., Suite 201, Fairfield, CA 94533.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a
copy of this resolution once, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above specified,
in a newspaper circulated in the City of Moorpark.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
\ \mor_pri_sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 -
Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 3 of 3
i:' 2 2 C
i f 2.
ITEM 1 ° - D
MEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services?'% -
DATE: June 4, 2002
SUBJECT: June 5, 2002, Agenda Item 10.D —Park Maintenance Assessment
Attached to this memo is the Resolution that should have been included with item
10.D (Park and Recreation Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District)
on the City Council's June 5, 2002, meeting. I inadvertently left it out of the final
version of my report.
cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager
Deborah Traffenstedt, ATCMICity Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, OF INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2002 -03, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF
HEARING FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION
MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, by its Resolution No. 99 -1625, after receiving a weighted
majority of ballots in support of the proposed assessment, this Council ordered the formation of
and levied the first assessment within the City of Moorpark Parks and Recreation Maintenance and
Improvement District (the "Assessment District ") pursuant to the provisions of Article XHID of
the California Constitution, and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Act "), Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500
thereof); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1942, the City Council ordered the preparation of an
Engineer's Report for the Parks and Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the
"District ") for fiscal year 2002 -03; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's Report was prepared by Shilts
Consultants, Inc., Engineer of Work, in accordance with 22565, et. seq., of the Streets and
Highways Code (the "Report") and Article XI>ID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk and the City Council has
reviewed the Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Report for "PARKS AND RECREATION MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ", on file with the City Clerk, has been duly
considered by the Moorpark City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and approved. The
Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under, and pursuant to,
the foregoing resolution.
SECTION 2. It is the intention of this Council to levy and collect assessments within the
Assessment District for fiscal year 2002 -03. Within the Assessment District, the existing and
proposed improvements, and any substantial changes proposed to be made to the existing
improvements, are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of public
facilities, including but not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, park grounds, park facilities,
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 - Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 1 of 3
landscape corridors, ground cover, shrubs and trees, street frontages, playground equipment and
hardcourt areas, senior and community centers, drainage systems, lighting, fencing, entry
monuments, basketball courts, tennis courts, running tracks, other recreational facilities, security
guards, graffiti removal and repainting, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as
applicable, for property owned and maintained by the City of Moorpark. Installation means the
construction of recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as
grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage,
lights, playground equipment, play courts, recreational facilities and public restrooms.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements, including repair, removal, or
replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of
landscaping; and cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove
or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation or
lighting of any improvements, and water for irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of
any other improvements.
SECTION 3. The Assessment District consists of the lots and parcels shown on the
boundary map of the Assessment District on file with the City Clerk, and reference is hereby made
to such map for further particulars.
SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report for a full and detailed
description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and the proposed
assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District. The
Engineer's Report identifies all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and
upon which an assessment will be imposed.
SECTION 5. The authorized maximum assessment rate for the Assessment District
includes an annual adjustment by an amount equal to the annual change in the Los Angeles Area
Consumer Price Index not to exceed 3 %. The authorized annual adjustment for fiscal year 2002-
03 is 2.8 %, which is equal to the change in the CPI from December 2000 to December 2001 plus
unused CPI changes from previous fiscal year assessments in excess of the 3% maximum annual
adjustment. Including the authorized annual adjustment, the maximum authorized and proposed
assessment rate for fiscal year 2002 -03 is $42.24 per single family equivalent benefit unit.
SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that on June 19, 2002, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m.
in the Council Chambers, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, the
Council will hold a public hearing to consider the ordering of the improvements and the levy of the
proposed assessments.
SECTION 7. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may file a
written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written
withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a
property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner.
Such protest or withdrawal of protest should be mailed to Shilts Consultants, Inc., 2300 Boynton
Ave., Suite 201, Fairfield, CA 94533.
M:\MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 - Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 2 of 3
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a
copy of this resolution once, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above specified,
in a newspaper circulated in the City of Moorpark.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 5`h day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
M: \MLindley \Assessment Dist \Moorpark res 2 - Prelim approval 02- 03.doc
Page 3 of 3
ITEM. .
of
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
1
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 27, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Pool Ad Hoc Committee Recommendation for
Community Aquatic Facility
DISCUSSION
On May 1, 2002, City Council received a report from the
City's Pool Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmembers Harper and
Millhouse) stating that Moorpark Unified School District
was not in a position to participate in funding the
construction and on -going maintenance of the proposed
Aquatic Facility at the level necessary to make the project
feasible. The Council then directed the Committee to meet
with Moorpark College representatives. The purpose of that
meeting was to determine whether or not the College would
be interested in partnering with the City on the
construction and operation of a community aquatic facility.
To that end, on May 20, the City's Pool Ad Hoc Committee
and staff met with Moorpark College representatives, Dr.
Walker (outgoing President) and Dr. Conrad (in- coming
President) . The Committee learned that Moorpark College is
interested in an aquatic facility and such a facility has
been included in its long -term master plan for several
years. However, the College does not believe it is in a
financial position to commit to on -going maintenance of
such a facility under the uncertainty of the current
economic climate. Similar to the City's situation, the
College is able to provide land and construction costs for
aquatic facility, but is not able to identify long -term
revenue sources to off -set annual facility operation and
maintenance costs. Dr. Walker also indicated that the
\\mor —Pri_serv\ home _folders\MLindley\PARKS\Park Projects\Pool\pool status report ccagd.doc
Pool Ad Hoc Committee Report
Page 2
college has a number of outstanding needs of higher
priority at this time than an aquatic program.
Since the City is unable to secure a partner in either MUSD
or Moorpark College to share proportionally in the long-
term operation and maintenance of a community aquatic
facility, the Ad Hoc Committee is recommending that the
City take no further action on the design of such a
facility at AVCP for a year. At a later time, when the
State's budget has been adopted and its impacts on the City
and potential partners are known, the Council may wish to
evaluate the feasibility of proceeding.
It is staff's intent to terminate the City's Agreement with
Martinez Architect Inc., the project architect, as provided
for in the Agreement. To date, the architect has performed
preliminary site investigative work, conducted a community
workshop, and prepared conceptual design options at a cost
of $14,490. The total contract cost for design is $164,000.
No future costs will be incurred until such time as the
City Council directs additional work. In the future, should
the City decide to complete the design of the aquatic
facility, it can renegotiate a new agreement with Martinez.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Concur with the City's Pool Ad Hoc Committee to take no
further action on the design and construction of the
Community Aquatic Facility at AVCP, terminate the City's
Agreement with Martinez Architect Inc., and evaluate the
status of the aquatic facility project during the FY
2003/04 Goals and Objectives process.
10
ITEM. FWWWWANINEMW
r
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT�'n? -"!v�r
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City Clerk _91—
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/5/02)
SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing City Manager to Approve an Addendum
to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Moorpark and North Park Village L.P., a Professional
Services Agreement between the City and BonTerra
Consulting for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) and Related Services for the North Park
Village Specific Plan Project (SP- 2002 -01), and a
Professional Services Agreement between the City and
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., for North Park Village
Traffic Analysis
BACKGROUND
On December 5, 2001, the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign
a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with North Park Village L.P.
for processing of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), General
Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and related entitlements. The MOU
was subsequently executed on December 10, 2001. The approved MOU
includes concurrence on the City's hiring of the consultant for
preparation of the EIR and also includes a Project Schedule (two
alternative schedules were included in Exhibit E to the MOU, see
Attachment 1 to this report). Based on the initial project
application information submitted by the North Park Village
applicant, the Notice of Preparation of an EIR and Initial Study
were distributed for review in January 2002. Over the past several
months, the applicant has been working to complete the project
application information required for preparation of the EIR and a
determination of application completeness. The Project Schedule
(MOU Exhibit E), including preparation of the Draft EIR, has been
affected by the delay in completion of the project description
information, including but not limited to receipt of digitized
topography, the conceptual grading plan, phasing plan,
infrastructure plans for water and sewer, complete land use and
circulation plans (including related information such as water
tanks, detention areas, trails, potential relocation of Moorpark
College Observatory, helispot for Fire Protection, etc.), and
revised Specific Plan document.
C I.W ���-
Honorable City Council
June 5, 2002 Regular Meeting
Page 2
DISCUSSION
The North Park Village Project Schedule requires revision. An
amendment to the MOU will be prepared to address the revised
Project Schedule (Attachment 2) and the payment schedule for the
EIR and Traffic Study to be prepared under contract to the City. A
formal Proposal for Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
has been received from BonTerra Consulting (Attachment 3). The
Traffic Study will be prepared by Austin Foust Associates, Inc.,
under a separate contract agreement with the City (reference
Attachment 4 for scope of work).
Amendment to MOU
Staff is asking the City Council to approve staff preparation and
approval of an amendment to the MOU to address the following:
• Cost and deposit schedule for the applicant's funding of the EIR
and Traffic Study.
• Revised Project Schedule - Exhibit E (reference Attachment 2)
• EIR certification decision time period
Staff's intent is that execution of the Amendment would occur upon
receipt of an initial EIR deposit of $269,138 (includes $234,033
deposit for funding of Tasks 1 and 2 of BonTerra proposal and
$35,105 for payment of City's administrative fee), plus $87,745 for
full payment for the Traffic Study (includes $76,300 for the
Traffic Study and $11,445 for payment of City's administrative
fee). Upon expenditure of 80 percent of the EIR deposit, the
applicant would be billed for up to half of the remainder cost of
$146,932 plus the 15 percent administrative fee, and would then be
billed for the remainder plus any allocation of contingency reserve
fund and administrative fee upon expenditure of 80 percent of the
second deposit. Payment of City staff costs is already addressed
in the MOU.
The amendment to the MOU will include language confirming the time
period for the EIR certification decision will begin upon
completion of the project application, with a specific list of
required submittals to be included. The Revised Project Schedule
(Attachment 2) will also be tied to application completeness and
timely delivery of the project description work product throughout
the EIR preparation period and public hearing process.
Professional Services Agreement with BonTerra Consulting
Staff is asking the Council to authorize the City Manager to
approve a standard Professional Services Agreement with BonTerra
Honorable City Council
June 5, 2002 Regular Meeting
Page 3
Consulting consistent with the attached proposal letter dated May
22, 2002 (Attachment 3). The alternatives analysis discussion in
Attachment 3 is intentionally not fully specific at this time, as
the alternatives will be developed through analysis of the
environmental impacts of the project, and will include a range of
reasonable alternatives to avoid or substantially lessen any of the
significant effects of the project.
Professional Services Agreement with Austin -Foust Associates
Staff is also asking the Council to authorize the City Manager to
approve a standard Professional Services Agreement with Austin -
Foust Associates for preparation of the North Park Village Project
Traffic Study consistent with the attached proposal letter dated
May 21, 2002 (Attachment 4). The scope of work includes a traffic
model update. Traffic counts have already been authorized to
ensure completion prior to the end of the school year. Traffic
counts in the vicinity of Moorpark College will be repeated in
September 2002, after the start of the Fall 2002 classes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Authorize the City Manager to approve and sign an Amendment to
the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and North
Park Village L.P., including EIR and Traffic Study deposit
requirements, revised project schedule and EIR certification
decision time period, and subject to City Attorney final
language approval;
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and sign a Professional
Services Agreement between the City and BonTerra Consulting
consistent with their proposal dated May 22, 2002; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to approve and sign a Professional
Services Agreement between the City and Austin -Foust
Associates, Inc., consistent with their proposal dated May 21,
2002.
Attachments:
1. Current Exhibit E (Project Schedule) to MOU
2. Proposed Revised Exhibit E to MOU
3. BonTerra Consulting Proposal dated 5/22/02
4. Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Proposal dated 5/21/02
C P. r?'?
'4.P v' v.;
ATTACHMENT 1
Exhibit E
Project Schedule
Schedule A
November 2002 - General Election Schedule
Completed
EIR Consultant Commence Initial Studies
November 30, 2001
Applicant Submits Preliminary Application for
General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone
Change, Sphere Plan Adjustment and Environmental
Checklist.
December 5, 2001
Council Adopts MOU
December 7, 2001
Notice of Preparation Issued
Feb 1, 2002
Draft EIR Completed
Feb 2 to March 17, 2002
45 day Public Review Period
March 18 to April 5, 2002
Response to Public Comments Drafted
April 1, 8, 15, 22, 29.
Planning Commission Hearings
May 15, 29, June 5, 12, 19,
26
City Council Hearing
June 26, 2002
City Council Calls For Election
November 5, 2002
Election
Schedule S
January 2003 - Special Election Schedule
Completed
EIR Consultant Commence Initial Studies
November 30, 2001
Applicant Submits Preliminary Application for
General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Zone
Change, Sphere Plan Adjustment and Environmental
Checklist.
December 5, 2001
Council Adopts MOU
December 7, 2001
Notice of Preparation Issued
March 29, 2001
Draft EIR Completed
March 30 to May 13, 2002
45 day Public Review Period
May 14 to June 7, 2002
Response to Public Comments Drafted
June 17 to July 1, 2002
Planning Commission Hearings
July 10 to August 30, 2002
City Council Hearings
October 16, 2002
Council Calls For Election
January 14, 2003
Election
12110101 Project Schedule
Page 20 of 20
ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit E
Revised Project Schedule
NORTH PARK VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (NO. SP- 2002 -01)
Task/Activity
Conduct Gnatcatcher Surveys Nov. 1, 2002 -Jan. 6, 2002
Notice of Preparation/Initial Study Review Period
Agency Scoping Meeting
Approval of City Contract with BonTen:a Consulting
Preparation of Screencheck Draft EIR
City review of Screencheck Draft EIR
Revisions to EIR
City review of "proof check" Draft EIR
Reproduction and distribution of Draft EIR
45 -day Public Review Period
Planning Commission Draft EIR Hearing
Preparation of Responses to Comments on Draft EIR
Planning Commission Project Hearing(s)
City Council Hearings
Council Calls For Election
Election
Jan. 24 -Feb. 25, 2002
Feb. 21, 2002
June 5, 2002
Sept. 13, 2002*
Sept. 16, 2002 -Oct. 7, 2002
Oct. 7, 2002 -Oct. 21, 2002
Oct. 22, 2002 -Oct. 28, 2002
Oct. 28, 2002 -Nov. 4, 2002
Nov. 4, 2002 -Dec. 19, 2002
Dec. 9, 2002 **
Dec. 19, 2002 - Depends on Comments
tbd * **
tbd
tbd
tbd
* September 2002 Traffic Count data for Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive not
included in September 13 Screencheck Draft EIR, Date of completion of Screencheck
Draft EIR is dependent upon timely delivery of project description information.
* *The first Planning Commission public hearing would be scheduled during the public
review period for the Draft EIR; this hearing date may be postponed to occur after
Planning Commission reorganization.
* ** tbd = to be determined
\ \MOR_PRI_SFRV \City Share \City Clerk\Fveryone\Agreements\NPV MOU Revised Schedule E.doc
5/30/02
'* Crll1, ],•, C,"
ATTACHMENT 3
C 0 Nl-':� S U L T I N G
An Enviranmen'ai Pic nni!-,0/R.- w, C'=
May 22, 2002
Deborah Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
ECEIVED
1. -0-Y EFIK;S 1)EPAR_;'M2�N"
VIA FACSIMILE & DELIVERY
(805) 529-8270
%�� Subject: Proposal for Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the
North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11 Project
Dear Ms. Traffenstedt:
Preparing an Environmental Impact Report for a large-scale, hillside planned
community requires knowledge of the local community and the technical issues
unique to projects in hillside areas. BonTerra. Consulting has extensive experience
in CEQA documentation for a variety of residential development projects throughout
southern California, including prior work on the project site for the City of Moorpark.
BonTerra Consulting's combination of local knowledge and extensive CEQA
experience provides a uniquely qualified consulting team for the preparation of this
EIR.
We would be pleased to discuss the attached proposal with you. Please call me if
you have any questions at (714) 444-9199. We look forward to continuing to work
with you on this challenging project.
Sincerely,
BONTERRA CONSULTING
Dana C. Privitt, AICP
Associate Principal
151 Katmu.s DcWe
Suite E-2b6'-'-']-.- RAProposa1s\Moorpark\P003 North Park Proposal-052202.wpd
Costa M
,e
Attachments A and B
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSAL TO PREPARE THE
NORTH PARK VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 EIR
BONTERRA CONSULTING PROJECT TEAM
The BonTerra Consulting Project Team for the North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11 EIR
project brings to the City of Moorpark senior environmental planning and engineering professionals.
BonTerra Consulting team members are among the most experienced consultants in southern
California, with exemplary performance records involving complex and controversial projects.
These individuals and firms bring to the project their own unique talents and expertise in the areas
of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance and technical evaluations. The
members of the BonTerra Consulting project team are:
BonTerra Consulting. Project Management and CEQA Documentation
Font Design Inc.: Visual Simulations
JHA Environmental- Air Quality
Leighton and Associates: Earth Resources
Mestre Greve Associates: Noise
RBF Consulting: Hydrology and Water Quality
BonTerra Consulting recognizes the importance of assigning highly qualified and experienced
individuals to effectively manage projects and contracts. It is important to assign individuals who
are familiar with the needs of the City of Moorpark. To ensure that these qualities are met for the
North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11 project, BonTerra Consulting has assigned Ms. Dana C.
Privitt, AICP as the project director.
SCOPE OF WORK
The BonTerra Consulting project team will be responsible for preparation of the EIR, including
participation in public meetings and hearings, preparation of responses to comments on the Draft
EIR, preparation of findings of fact, development of the mitigation monitoring program, and other
required CEQA notices. The technical analyses will be based on a combination of information
contained in the Initial Study /Notice of Preparation, documentation prepared as part of the prior
Hidden Creek Ranch Final EIR, as well as other existing and new technical documentation.
Task 1 Project Initiation
BonTerra Consulting will attend a kick -off meeting with the applicant's project team and the City
of Moorpark to discuss the project and the proposed scope of work. Information to be provided to
BonTerra Consulting will include the applicant's project description and objectives, project
schedule, as well as all other pertinent information related to the proposed project.
BonTerra Consulting will determine whether available information is adequate and complete. The
Citywill be notified if additional information is needed. Early identification of data needs and receipt
of this data is critical in meeting project schedules. If additional information is needed, a list of data
needs will be provided. Work can typically proceed on those tasks which are not dependent on the
forthcoming information.
A -1
We will meet separately with our project team to provide them with this information. Team
members will be informed of applicant objectives, priorities, and concerns that need to addressed
in completing the authorized task.
Task 2 Prepare Screencheck EIR
BonTerra Consulting will prepare the Screencheck EIR based upon the Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study and responses received, community and agency input, and technical evaluation of the
previous Hidden Creek Ranch project, and the currently proposed project. Unanticipated issues
may require an adjustment to this scope of work and budget. This EIR is intended to provide
project -level CEQA evaluation forthe project site development and programmatic CEQA evaluation
for the freeway interchange.
Project Description: BonTerra Consulting will work with city staff and the applicant to prepare a
project description that articulates the overall objectives for development of the site. Information
provided by the applicant will be the basis for the project description. A draft project description
will be provided to the City and applicant for review and approval prior to submittal of the
screencheck EIR. This process provides the City and applicant with an opportunity to clarify any
project issues prior to the technical analysis is initiated. The project description will include:
• Regional and local setting, including exhibits
• Site history and existing land uses including prior land uses, ongoing land uses (e.g.,
location of oil well sites, oil extraction lease rights, etc.)
• Statement of project objectives (to be provided by applicant and City)
• Project's technical, economic and environmental characteristics, and important project
features, including but not limited to, the following:
— Residential uses: number of units, types (single - family /multiple - family, attached,
detached, affordable, other), densities by use, location, architecture
— Retail uses: square footage, floor area ratio, uses, location, architecture
— Parks and recreation: number of parks and private recreation areas, locations, acreage,
permitted/proposed uses, location of lake and acreage, source of water
— Open space: types, permitted uses, acreage
— Trail and bikeway system: types of trails /bikeways, trail/bikeway circulation plans and
locations
— Institutional: acreage, uses (e.g., school sites, observatory, college uses, other),
location(s), square footage
— Infrastructure improvements: locations of reservoirs, helistop, detention/retention basins,
acreage, domestic and reclaimed water, sewer, other as applicable
— Circulation improvements: major roadway improvements, locations, classification of
roadways
• Project phasing: grading duration by phase, construction duration by phase, infrastructure
improvements by phase
• A list of permits and other approvals required to implement the project
• A list of the agencies that are expected to use the EIR in their decision - making
• A list of related environmental review and consultation requirements required by federal,
state, or local laws, regulations, or policies
Environmental Setting
The El R will contain a discussion of the existing environment in the project vicinity. As required by
the CEQA Guidelines, the environmental setting discussion will reflect the conditions as they exist
at the time the Notice of Preparation /Initial Study was released.
BonTerra Consulting will describe the reasonably foreseeable projects within a defined study area
approved by the City that may result in cumulative impacts with the proposed project. We will work
with City staff to ensure that the El R is prepared at the appropriate level of detail and that pertinent
projects are evaluated. Consultation with Moorpark staff, as well as Moorpark College, the City of
Simi Valley, and County of Ventura staff will occur to ensure that expected/planned growth in the
project vicinity is known and appropriately addressed in the EIR.
Environmental Impact Evaluation
The EIR will clearly identify significant environmental effects anticipated for each environmental
issue with proposed project implementation. Proposed significance criteria/thresholds of
significance will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the preparation of impact
analyses for the EIR.
Establishment of a nexus between the project- specific and cumulative impacts and the suggested
mitigation is critical. We will differentiate between features of the project (i.e., project design
features) that serve to partially /completely mitigate potential impacts, standard conditions and
requirements (e.g., compliance with building and energy codes, etc.), and "conventional" mitigation
measures. Project design features would be identified in the project description, and then
described in the impacts discussion for each technical section as to how the design feature could
"prevent or lessen" the significant impact. These design features, as do standard conditions of
approval, require monitoring to ensure that required features are implemented. "Conventional"
measures are provided for each significant impact. Measures within each technical section will be
grouped according to the impact category. Project effects which cannot be mitigated to a level less
than significant will be clearly identified.
In addition to the analysis of potential project- specific impacts, BonTerra Consulting will describe
the reasonably foreseeable projects within a defined study area approved by the City that may
result in cumulative impacts with the proposed project. The assessment of potential cumulative
impacts will be conducted based on the revised CEQA Guidelines relative to how a project's
contribution to cumulative impacts is determined. The evaluation area for cumulative projects will
vary depending on the technical issue to be addressed. Therefore, for each technical section, we
will define the cumulative study area assumed in the assessment of the project's contribution to
cumulative impacts.
Each section of the EIR is prepared pursuant to CEQA and will present and analyze the proposed
project for both Phase I and buildout of the site. We believe in impact avoidance and will make
recommendations throughout the documentation process to minimize or avoid impacts. This can
include land use modifications that could self- mitigate anticipated impacts associated with General
Plan implementation, as well as the provision of mitigation options.
C
A -3
Land Use and Planning: Implementation of the proposed project requires amendments to the
Moorpark General Plan Land Use Plan and a change of zone to allow for the development of
residential and supporting uses on the North Park Village site. The approximately 3,954 -acre
project site is located in unincorporated eastern Ventura County, California. The City of Moorpark
is immediately contiguous to the project site to the south. The project site is generally bounded to
the north by Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park (a Ventura County regional park facility); to the
south by Moorpark College, residential development, and vacant land in the City of Moorpark; to
the east by vacant land in the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura, and City of Simi Valley Sphere
of Influence; and to the west by vacant land and orchards in the County of Ventura. The project
site consists of predominantly vacant land with steep topography in the northeastern portion sloping
to more moderate topography in the southern and southeastern portion of the site.
The land use discussion will include an analysis of the project's compatibility with existing and
planned land uses that are adjacent to and in the vicinity of the site in the City of Moorpark and
surrounding unincorporated areas.
Analysis also will include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable planning and
policy documents, and will focus on the city's General Plan, North Park Village Specific Plan
No. 11, and other applicable planning documents including the SOAR Ordinance.
Population, Housing, and Employment: This section will address the project's affect on
population, housing (including affordable housing), and employment in the City of Moorpark and
subregional area. Available state and local demographic data, as well as information from the City
and applicant, will be used to prepare this assessment. The section also will include a discussion
of the project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of
Moorpark General Plan Housing Element.
Transportation and Circulation: Traffic will be a major focus of the EIR and concern to the
community. As such, BonTerra Consulting will incorporate the findings of a transportation and
circulation analysis prepared by Austin -Foust Associates (under contract to the City of Moorpark),
who will analyze the impacts of the proposed land uses within the defined study area using existing
and long -range traffic data included in the City's traffic model. The traffic scope of work is included
in Attachment B and is summarized below. The section also will include a discussion of the
project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark
General Plan Circulation Element.
Task 1: Traffic Counts. Existing traffic count data will be collected for use in the traffic model and
for the "existing conditions" section of the traffic study. Average daily traffic (24 -hour traffic counts)
on roadway segments and a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection counts will be collected and used
in an update of the City of Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model and project impact analysis for North
Park Village.
Task 2., Traffic Model Update. The Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model will be recalibrated to year
2002 conditions with a forecast horizon year of 2020. To update the model, traffic count data
(Task 1) and existing (2002) and future (2007 and 2020) land use data is required. Austin -Foust
Associates will provide the City with traffic zone maps and spreadsheet summarys of 1994, 2005,
and 2015 zonal land use data for use in the City's update of the land use data base. Recalibration
of the model includes the extraction of regional travel pattern data from the Ventura County's
countywide traffic model, calibration of the 2002 version of the model against observed traffic
counts, and preparation of 2007 and 2020 future traffic forecasts based on the City of Moorpark
2007 and 2020 land use projections.
Task 3., Project Traffic Analysis and Traffic Report. Prior to the commencement of the traffic study,
the methodology will be subject to the review of the cities of Moorpark and Simi Valley and the
A -4
County of Ventura. The traffic study will address phases of development. The first phase assumes
a maximum of 500 dwelling units and Campus Park Drive and /or Collins Drive as the only access
to the project site. The buildout phase assumes access provided from Campus Park Drive and a
new SR -118 interchange. If the traffic analysis identifies that acceptable levels of service cannot
be maintained on the existing roadway system in the project vicinity, then the traffic analysis will
propose a lesser number of dwelling units for the first phase. No development beyond the first
phase will be permitted without the completion of the freeway interchange.
The first phase will be analyzed based on existing (2002) and interim year (2007) conditions. The
buildout phase will be analyzed under the long -range (2020) conditions based on the buildout of
the General Plans of the cities of Moorpark and Simi Valley and the County of Ventura. ADTs and
a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection volumes will be produced for each traffic analysis timeframe.
Mitigation will be identified for all impacted locations of the roadway system.
Air Quality: JHA Environmental Consultants will prepare an air quality analysis describing existing
conditions, including regional and local air quality and meteorology, and the state, federal, and
regional air quality regulatory framework. The air quality scope of work is included in Attachment
B. CEQA and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) significance thresholds will
be used to determine significance. A peak day and peak quarter construction scenario will be
developed which will include total construction emissions associated with both Phase 1 and buildout
of the project site based on estimates of acres graded and excavated, construction equipment
used, and employee vehicles traveling to /from the site. The analysis will compare regional and
local traffic impacts from the two project phases with existing and future conditions, with and
without the project. Current approved emission factors and traffic estimates, provided by Austin -
Foust Associates and approved by both VCAPCD and Caltrans methodologies, will be used.
Based on future traffic projections at adjacent intersections, JHA will qualitatively assess the
potential for carbon monoxide concentration that could adversely affect sensitive receptors in the
project area. Project- specific and cumulative impacts will be identified using VCAPCD
recommended thresholds of significance for air quality impacts. Mitigation measures will be
proposed for all impacts identified as significant. The section will also include a discussion of the
project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark
General Plan.
Noise: Mestre Greve Associates will prepare a noise assessment evaluating potential noise
impacts of the proposed project, focusing on construction noise, long -term changes in noise levels
in the project area, and changes in ambient noise levels associated with increased onsite activity.
The noise scope of service is included in Attachment B. Ambient noise measurements will be
conducted at locations on the site and near the adjacent residential areas. The primary purpose
of the measurements will be to determine the noise levels currently experienced at and around the
project site. The Federal Highway Administration highway noise model ( "FHWA Highway Traffic
Noise Prediction Model," FHWA -RD -77 -108) will be used in conjunction with the noise
measurements to describe existing noise levels in the project vicinity; this model is the widely
accepted method of evaluating roadway noise impacts. State Route 118 and Moorpark College
are the prime noise generators in the area. Community noise standards relevant to this project are
contained in the City of Moorpark Noise Element of the General Plan and Noise Ordinance. These
standards will be summarized and their relevance to the project discussed. The section will also
include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those
in the City of Moorpark General Plan.
Potential noise impacts can be divided into short-term construction noise, long -term impacts on
surrounding land uses, and onsite noise /land use compatibility impacts. Project noise impacts will
be assessed based on total increases in the ambient noise level and potential exceedances of City
standards. Mestre Greve Associates will provide tables to identify potential project noise impacts,
and identify mitigation measures necessary to achieve the City's noise standards. Noise levels
from construction equipment will be estimated at nearby residential areas. The application of the
City of Moorpark Noise Ordinance to control construction noise will be discussed.
The noise impacts associated with the project's traffic on adjacent land uses will be assessed in
terms of the CNEL noise scale for the two phases of construction. The increase in traffic noise
levels due to the project will be determined. Increases in noise levels due to the project and project
alternatives will be determined; quantitative analysis of both phases of the proposed project will be
provided. Areas that will experience significant noise increases will be identified, the absolute noise
levels experienced in these areas will be determined, and the resulting land use /noise compatibility
discussed. Preliminary noise barrier locations and other mitigation strategies will be identified for
the control of noise levels within the project site.
Traffic noise impacts within the project site also will be assessed for compatibility with the proposed
land uses. Noise impacts from traffic noise on the proposed land uses will be assessed. Noise
levels within the project area will be determined and compared to noise /land compatibility
guidelines contained in the City of Moorpark and/or California Compatibility Guidelines.
Biological Resources: BonTerra Consulting will conduct biological surveys as a part of the
preparation of the EIR. The biological resources scope of work is provided in Attachment B to this
proposal. The section also will include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable
planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark General Plan.
Visual/Aesthetics: BonTerra Consulting will characterize the existing aesthetic environment and
visual resources, including a discussion of views within the site and views from surrounding areas
to the site. The compatibility of the project's massing, height, and building materials with the
surrounding area will be evaluated. Available conceptual landscape plans also will be described
in this section.
We will base the visual assessment on site reconnaissance, site photographs, and simulations to
be prepared for BonTerra Consulting by Font Design Inc. This scope of work is included in
Attachment B. Computer modeling will include building massing, streets, and landscaping. Photos
will be taken at view locations in and around the site. A list of potential locations will be provided
to the City and applicant for review and approval prior to preparing the visual simulations. Ten
visual simulations will be provided: five simulations for Phase 1 and five simulations for project
buildout, including the SR -118 interchange. For the photo composition, the chosen views will be
synchronized with the computer model, rendered, and then superimposed into the photographs.
Landscaping and appropriate masking will be included to accurately depict the scene.
Potential light and glare impacts, particularly with respect to building materials and nighttime uses,
associated with the development of the proposed project will be discussed in the EIR. Existing City
policies and guidelines and zoning regulations regarding light and glare will be reviewed. Mitigation
measures will be recommended to reduce potential aesthetic and light and glare impacts to the
maximum extent possible. The section will also include a discussion of the project's consistency
with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark General Plan.
The following information will need to be provided as CAD files by the project applicant for
preparation of the visual simulations: grading plan, pad and street elevations, setback and height
requirements /proposals, and natural topography (digitized CAD files), as well as proposed
architectural and landscape themes.
Hydrology and Water Quality: RBF Consulting will be responsible for the preparation of a
hydrologic study for the proposed project. This scope of work is included in Attachment B. The
applicant will be responsible for the provision of a grading plan and a drainage plan (surface and
storm drain), including text, maps (CAD files), and diagrams. In accordance with the City's Hillside
d rrn sM�
A -6
Management Ordinance, the hydrologic study will address: a) onsite hydrologic conditions;
b) location of above /below ground springs; c) locations of all well sites; d) potential for offsite flood
inundation; e) downstream flood hazards; f) identification of natural drainage courses; g) effects
of hydrologic conditions on proposed development; and h) design criteria to mitigate hydrologic
hazards. The study will address runoff and debris from tributary areas. Runoff and debris volumes
will be computed using the County of Ventura Flood Control District criteria.
As a part of the analysis, RBF Consulting will delineate the existing watershed and drainage
patterns associated with the project site. The local watershed subboundaries for the tributary
drainage area will be determined in order to evaluate the storm drain watershed area and existing
facility requirements. The critical concentration points will be identified in order to develop a "link -
node" rational hydrology model. Preliminary estimate peak runoff rates associated with existing
surface hydrology for onsite and tributary offsite watershed drainage area will be prepared. Onsite
drainage boundaries and subareas will be delineated and mapped. A single storm frequency
rational hydrology analysis for the project's offsite and onsite watershed will be prepared. Based
on the County's methodology, peak discharges for the design rainfall event to meet jurisdictional
design requirements will be identified. Drainage subareas and patterns will be identified based on
the proposed local storm drain system and grading plans. The surface hydrology analysis will
quantify the runoff for a single rainfall frequency. A determination of the preliminary underground
storm drain system requirements will be prepared to identify the necessary level of flood protection
and hydraulic conveyance. Preliminary horizontal alignments of facilities and estimate of the size
requirements for hydraulic conveyance will be provided. Preliminary sizing of detention basins and
debris basins will be estimated.
A preliminary assessment and sizing of required stormwater detention facilities for the first phase
and site buildout will be prepared based on Ventura County and Regional Water Quality Control
Board requirements. The intent of these facilities is to provide mitigation of water quality concerns.
The project's compliance with the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program will be assessed, including the presentation of potential Best Management
Practices to be incorporated into the project. The section also will include a discussion of the
project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark
General Plan.
In addition to the aforementioned analysis, Kennedy /Jenks Consultants is preparing a lake water
supply feasibility study under contract to the Calleguas Municipal Water District for incorporation
into the EIR. The study will investigate alternative sources of water for the proposed 60 -acre
manmade lake. Options include the use of potable water supplies, local groundwater, recycled
water from the Simi Valley Water Quality Control Plant or the Moorpark Wastewater Treatment
Plant, captured stormwater, and the use of potable water with secondary use of water as a recycled
water service to other users. The study also will address the infrastructure and maintenance
requirements of the lake, associated water quality requirements, environmental issues, and
construction, operation, and maintenance costs.
The section also will include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable planning
policies, including those in the City of Moorpark General Plan.
Geology and Soils: Leighton and Associates will be responsible for the preparation of a
geological and soils evaluation of the proposed development. This scope of work is included in
Attachment B. BonTerra Consulting will summarize the findings of the Leighton and Associates
study in the EIR and also will include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable
planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark General Plan Safety Element.
In accordance with the City of Moorpark Hillside Management Ordinance, the following information
will be evaluated and incorporated into the El R: surface and subsurface geology of the site, effects
A-7 - °7
' �• W-:
of geological conditions on the proposed development, design criteria necessary to mitigate any
identified geologic conditions. The Leighton and Associates Geotechnical Report will include: a) a
literature search of readily available maps, aerials, and literature including prior studies conducted
by the firm; b) a site reconnaissance; c) an updated deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard
analyses to identify all active faults, maximum earthquake magnitudes, and expected project site
ground motion; d) an assessment of potential seismically- induced ground failure; e) an
identification of potential impacts associated with the groundwater aquifer, earthquake damage,
loss of mineral resources, waste disposal, slope and/or foundation instability, erosion,
sedimentation and flooding, and land subsidence; and f) an evaluation of the feasibility and
methods of mitigating potential geological and geotechnical hazards and constraints.
In accordance with the City's Hillside Management Ordinance, Leighton and Associates also will
evaluate the preliminary grading plans prepared for the project by the applicant's civil engineer.
A grading plan will be prepared for the first phase development and project buildout in accordance
with the Hillside Management Ordinance. CAD files will be provided to the BonTerra Consulting
project team for inclusion in the EIR. The grading plans will indicate the height and width of all
manufactured slopes, proposed drainage patterns, methods of storm water detention/retention, and
identification of areas to remain in a natural state. Offsite contours will be shown for adjacent
unimproved areas within 100 feet of the project site.
Leighton and Associates will evaluate the slope map prepared for the project by the applicant's civil
engineer. A slope map will be prepared for the first phase development and project buildout in
accordance with the Hillside Management Ordinance. CAD files will be provided to the BonTerra
Consulting project team for inclusion in the EIR. In accordance with the Moorpark Hillside
Management Ordinance, the project applicant's civil engineer shall provide BonTerra Consulting
with a color cut and fill exhibit and a minimum of two cross sections depicting the vertical variation
between natural and finished grades. CAD files will be provided to BonTerra Consulting.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials: The project is not expected to include any new uses that
would create a public hazard related to hazardous materials or hazardous emissions. However,
a Phase I Assessment previously conducted for the project site found localized staining of surficial
soil by crude oil associated with oil extraction activities on the project site. Sumps and spill
containment areas surrounding oil wells on the project site may contain crude oil, clays, debris,
inert materials, and heavy metals. Heavy metals are classified as hazardous substances by the
California Code of Regulations, Title 22, if they occur above a given concentration. Furthermore,
soils beneath or adjacent to sumps and spill containment areas may have been impacted by
contaminants such as gasoline, diesel fuel, crude oil and lubricating oil. Accumulations of
miscellaneous debris including 55- gallon drums, oil field and farming equipment and construction
materials occur on the project site. The debris could include hazardous materials; said materials
would have to be cleared from the site. The findings of the prior evaluations will be summarized
in the EIR; preparation of a health risk assessment is not assumed as a part of this scope of
services.
Short-term grading activities can result in the exposure of people to San Joaquin Valley Fever, an
infectious disease caused by the fungus Cocciodioides immitis. Infection is caused by inhalation
of Coccidoides immitis spores that have become airborne when dry, dusty soil or dirt is disturbed
by wind, construction, farming, or other activities. The potential for exposure associated with
grading activities on the site will be addressed in the EIR.
This section also will include a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable planning
policies, including those in the City of Moorpark General Plan Safety Element.
Provision of Public Services and Utilities: The project site is expected to be served by the
following service and utility providers:
"
A-8 'i� � -.—,e a.3
• Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1
• Calleguas Municipal Water District
• Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Facility
• Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department
• Ventura County Sheriff's Department
• Ventura County Fire Protection District
• Moorpark Unified School District
As a part of the EIR analysis, a water supply assessment will be prepared to comply with the
requirements set forth by Senate Bills 610 and 221. This assessment will be prepared in
cooperation with and subject to the acceptance of Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1, as
well as the City of Moorpark. Additional technical analysis will be prepared to address the provision
of wastewater service to the project. Potential effects associated with project implementation can
be related to the continued provision of adequate service levels, environmental effects associated
with the provision of additional utilities to the site, and the need to upgrade and/or provide additional
facilities to serve the project. The determination of effects also will be addressed in relationship
to the City of Moorpark's projections for development set forth in the General Plan and consistency
with applicable planning policies.
Cultural Resources: The project site has been subject to prior assessment for historical and
prehistoric archaeological resources. The EIR analysis will be based on this existing information;
no additional site surveys /field investigations are assumed in this scope of work. Development of
the project site could result in direct impacts to archaeological sites, including potentially significant
archaeological resources located within the project site. As a result, BonTerra Consulting will
evaluate the proposed project's impacts on these cultural resources. It is expected that with the
provision of standard conditions and mitigation, that significant impacts would be mitigated to a
level that is considered less than significant. This section also will include a discussion of the
project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the City of Moorpark
General Plan.
Paleontological Resources: The project site has been subject to prior assessment for
paleontological resources. The EIR analysis will be based on this existing information; no
additional site surveys /field investigations are assumed in this scope of work. The project site
contains rock units rated from a high to low paleontologic sensitivity. Therefore, the proposed
project could potentially result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. As a result,
BonTerra Consulting will evaluate the proposed project's impacts on these resources. It is
expected that with the provision of standard conditions and mitigation, that significant impacts
would be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant. This section also will include
a discussion of the project's consistency with applicable planning policies, including those in the
City of Moorpark General Plan.
Alternatives: BonTerra Consulting will provide a qualitative assessment of alternatives to the
proposed project. The determination of which alternatives will be assessed in the EIR will be based
on several factors: 1) CEQA mandates; 2) significant project - related environmental impacts; and
3) comments provided during the Notice of Preparation, agency scoping meeting, and the Planning
Commission /City Council workshop.
This scope of services assumes the analysis of eight alternatives. The following is presented as
potential alternatives to be assessed in the EIR if necessary to reduce significant impacts
associated with the proposed project:
• No Development: Retention of the site in its existing conditions
• No Project: Development of the site consistent with the existing County of Ventura General
Plan and zoning designations
r,-,n r-,
A -9 v v qr %-i
• Alternative Location
• Design Alternative(s)
• Land Use Alternative(s), including the no lake alternative
• Circulation Alternative(s)
The alternatives will be provided insufficient detail for comparison with the proposed project. Each
alterative will be evaluated with respect to each key impact category identified for the project as
having a potential significant effect. The advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and
reasons for rejecting or recommending it will be addressed; the Environmentally Superior
Alternative of the eight alternatives will be identified as required by CEQA. Graphic exhibits
depicting each alternative will be incorporated into the Alternatives Section. The applicant will be
responsible for providing technical assistance on the alternatives descriptions and analysis. For
example, the applicant's civil engineer will be responsible for providing land use and grading data
for the selected alternatives addressed in the EIR.
Should the City and/or applicant request that additional alternatives be addressed in the EIR,
BonTerra Consulting's scope of services can be amended.
Other EIR Sections: The following additional CEQA required sections will be provided as a part
of the EIR:
• Table of Contents
• Executive Summary (summary table to be provided with second Screencheck EIR)
• Long -term Impacts: Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes, Unavoidable
Environmental Effects, Growth- Inducing Impacts
• Effects Not Found to be Significant
• Glossary
• References
• Preparers and Contributors, Agencies and Persons Consulted
Task 3 Prepare Draft EIR for Public Review
Upon receipt of the City's and applicant's comments on the Screencheck EIR submittal, BonTerra
Consulting will make revisions and resubmit the document for one Screencheck EIR review. The
City's and applicant's comments, the latter at the discretion of the City, will be incorporated.
Additional review cycles are not assumed in this scope of services. A "proof check" copy of the
Draft EIR will be provided to the City for final approval prior to reproduction and public distribution.
BonTerra Consulting will distribute copies of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse and, local
community groups, local agencies, surrounding jurisdictions, etc. In addition, BonTerra Consulting
will provide the City with the documentation necessary to post the Draft EIR on the City of Moorpark
web site. A camera -ready copy of the Draft EIR will be provided to a local printing company
(selected by the City) in order that individuals can pay directly to have a personal copy of the
document. Lastly, CDs will be produced, for sale, of the Draft EIR.
BonTerra Consulting will prepare and distribute the Notice of Completion and Notice of Availability.
The City of Moorpark will be responsible for all newspaper notices and filing of the Notice of
Completion with the County Clerk.
Task 4 Responses to Comments on Draft EIR
Upon receipt of written comments on the Draft EIR from the State Clearinghouse and other parties,
BonTerra Consulting will review all comments. BonTerra Consulting will prepare written responses
to comments that raise environmental issues. These responses will be provided as a separate
A-10 C Cx h >: • -r „130
Responses to Comments document. Upon receipt of the City's comments, BonTerra Consulting
will finalize the responses to comments. Responses to all commentors will be mailed by BonTerra
Consulting at least 10 days before consideration of certification of the Final EIR, as required by
CEQA.
Task 5 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring Program
To comply with Public Resources Code 2081.6, BonTerra Consulting will prepare a mitigation
monitoring program (MMP) for review by the Planning Commission and adoption by the City
Council at the time of the CEQA findings. The MMP will be prepared at the same time as
responses to comments. BonTerra Consulting will coordinate with City staff to refine the format
and the content of the MMP. If the Planning Commission and/or City Council modify the project
and /or recommended conditions of approval /mitigation measures for the proposed project,
BonTerra Consulting will revise the MMP. However, such modifications are not assumed in the
fees for this project.
Task 6 Prepare CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
BonTerra Consulting will prepare draft findings of fact and a draft statement of overriding
considerations in accordance with the state CEQA Guidelines §15091 and 15093. Upon receipt
of the City's and applicant's comments on these documents, final copies will be submitted to the
City for use by the City Council in its deliberations on the project. If the City Council modifies the
project and /or recommended conditions of approval/mitigation measures for the proposed project
after the draft findings are complete, BonTerra Consulting will revise the findings. However, such
modifications are not assumed in the fees for this project.
Task 7 Prepare Final EIR
Upon certification of the Final EIR, BonTerra Consulting will prepare a final compilation document
inclusive of the EIR, EIR technical appendices, responses to comments, and resolutions. The EIR
will be prepared as a redline /strikeout document.
Task 8 Project Management and Coordination
This scope assumes regular interaction between the BonTerra Consulting project team and the
City's project team and requires frequent information - sharing among project team members. This
approach will assist in coordination efforts, decision - making, and data acquisition without requiring
additional time or resources, and will give City staff advanced input on environmental findings.
While the City can contact any team member at any time, at the onset of the project, BonTerra
Consulting will identify the key contact people. It is the responsibility of these individuals to know
the status of various project components and to disseminate project information to appropriate
team members. Limiting the individuals who initially receive project information reduces the
potential for missed or ineffective communication.
Task 9 Meetings and Hearings
Attendance at Meetings with City Staff. BonTerra Consulting's project manager will be available
to attend project meetings with staff throughout the EIR process. Other members of the BonTerra
Consulting project team will be available, as needed, to attend these meetings within their
established task budgets. This scope of services assumes Ms. Privitt's attendance at bi- monthly
team meetings or conference call participation during the preparation of the EIR.
Planning Commission/City Council Study Sessions and Public Hearings: Attendance by
Ms. Privitt or another senior member of the project team at public hearings on the project are
A -11'x, ?�
assumed in this scope of services. Ms. Privitt will be available to make presentations concerning
topical issues, analysis and findings of the draft EIR, as well as be available to answer questions
or make specific presentations, as directed by City staff.
DELIVERABLES
BonTerra Consulting has assumed the following deliverables as a part of the project:
• Screencheck EIR
• Revised Screencheck EIR
• "Proof Check" Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Draft EIR and Technical Appendices
• Draft Responses to Comments Document
• Final Responses to Comments Document
• Final EIR (redline /strikeout document)
• Draft Findings/Statement of Overriding Considerations
• Final Findings /Statement of Overriding Consideration
• Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program
• Final Mitigation Monitoring Program
The number of copies of each document will be based on the City approved mailing list and public
requests for documents. All document reproduction will be handled through a printing company
with whom the project applicant has an account. In addition to reproduced copies of al documents,
the City of Moorpark will be provided with a PDF version of the Draft EIR and the Responses to
Comments document in order that the City may post this information on the City of Moorpark web
site. The Draft EIR and Final EIR also will be made available on computer diskette.
FEE ESTIMATE
Task
Description
Fees
Task 1
Project Initiation
$ 6,150.00
Task 2
Prepare Screencheck EIR
227,883.003
Task 3
Prepare Second Screencheck and Draft EIR
19,020.00
Task 4
Prepare Responses to Comments on Draft EIR
28,200.00
Task 5
Prepare Mitigation Monitoring Program
3,340.00
Task 6
Prepare Findings of Fact
4,600.00
Task 7
Prepare Final EIR (redline /strikeout)
4,980.00
Task 8
Project Management and Coordination
31,385.00
Task 8
Attendance at Team Meetings and Public Hearings
41,250.00
Word Processing /Editing, Clerical, Graphics
24.663.00
Professional Labor Fees
$391,471.00
Subconsultants
Font Design Inc. (Visual Simulations) $ 24,000.00
JHA Environmental Consultants (Air Quality) 6,500.00
Leighton and Associates (Earth Resources) 21,300.00
Mestre Greve Associates (Noise) 5,400.00
RBF Consulting (Hydrology and Water Quality) 46,100.00
Subconsultant Handling 7,231.00
Subconsultant Fees $ 110,531.00
Estimated Reimbursable Direct Costs
Mailing of notices and documents $ 1,250.00
Reproduction of documents (6)
Web site PDF documentation 6,500.00
In -house reproduction /communications 11,744.00
Deliveries/mileage 3,900.00
Project expenses 2,500.00
Reimbursable Directs Fees $25,894.00
Proposed Fees $527,896.00
10% Reserve Fund 52,789.60
TOTAL $580,685.60
Fee assumptions
1. Modifications to the project description and/or project assumptions will require a scope and budget augment.
2. Changes to the project schedule will require a budget adjustment.
3. Note: Biological resources assessments are currently being conducted; fee $139,460.00.
4. Budget assumes the attendance of Project Director at 300 hours of project team meetings/public hearings.
Attendance at additional meetings and hearings will be billed on a time and materials basis subject to prior approval
by the City of Moorpark.
5. Preparation of responses to comments assumes 140 technical hours; should responses require additional work
efforts, a budget augment will be required.
6. Actual fees for reproduction will be assumed by the project applicant.
7. Distribution of documents will be provided to the City of Moorpark based on a finalized distribution list.
A -13 Ri'CvhCr v'_43
8. The above costs do not necessarily include the attendance of subconsultants at public hearings; should their
presence be requested; a budget augment will be required.
9. Reserve fund cannot be used without prior authorization from the City of Moorpark for project- related labor or direct
cost work tasks.
"''.; rye''
.���`
A -14
ATTACHMENT B
SUBCONSULTANT SCOPES OF SERVICE
BONTERRA CONSULTING
BIOLOGICAL SERVICES
TASK 1 LITERATURE REVIEW $1,110.00
A literature review will be conducted to update the list of species that have been identified as
special status by state, federal, and local resources agencies and organizations and have a
potential to occur within the project site or immediate vicinity. Sources to be reviewed include: (1)
special status species lists from the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and California Native Plant Society (CNPS); (2) database searches
of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the Electronic Inventory of the CNPS;
(3) the most recent Federal Register listing package and critical habitat determination for each
federally- listed Endangered or Threatened species potentially occurring within the project site; (4)
the CDFG Annual Report on the status of California's listed Threatened and Endangered plants
and animals; and (5) other biological studies conducted in the vicinity of the project site. In
addition, comment letters from the USFWS, CDFG, and CNPS on the previous EIR prepared for
the project site will be reviewed to identify specific concerns by the resource agencies.
TASK II VEGETATION MAPPING/GENERAL PLANT
AND WILDLIFE SURVEYS $44,395.00
Vegetation types will be mapped to identify and describe the extent and distribution of various
vegetation types on the project site, including any special status vegetation types. During the
vegetation mapping effort, an assessment will be made of the potential for special status plant
species that may be present. A description of the existing quality and species composition of the
vegetation types will be compiled based upon observations and field notes taken during the survey.
A general walk -over survey will be conducted to document existing wildlife use on the project site
and will include an assessment of the potential for special status wildlife species that may be
present. During the wildlife surveys, active searches for non - sensitive wildlife species will be
performed using systematic surveys through appropriate habitat. Active searches for reptiles and
amphibians will include lifting, overturning, and carefully replacing rocks and debris. Birds will be
identified by the use of standard visual and auditory recognition, and the abundances will be noted
for each species. The presence of nests or other evidence of breeding activity also will be noted
during these surveys. Mammal searches will be conducted during the day and will include
searching for and identifying diagnostic sign including scat, footprints, scratch -outs, dusting bowls,
burrows, and trails. Each habitat type will be evaluated for its potential to support common
mammal species that include their home range in the project area.
A compendia of plant and wildlife species observed during field surveys on the project site will be
developed based on observations from field notes as well as previous surveys of the project site.
The compendia will include species observed during the current surveys and previous surveys and
will be included with the documentation for the project site (Task III below).
To complete this task, the following materials need to be provided:
• A topographic map with project boundaries (200 to 400 scale preferred; Note: BonTerra
Consulting has the capability to print maps at this scale if digital files are provided);
B -1
• A current aerial photograph of the project site (preferable at the same scale as the
topographic map; Note: BonTerra Consulting has the capability to print maps at this scale
if digital files are provided). If an aerial is not available, one will be purchased by BonTerra
Consulting; and
• Access to the project site, including the names of anyone that needs to be notified prior to
the site visit and keys to locked gates on the project site.
TASK III WILDLIFE CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
$9,550.00
The open space areas immediately surrounding the project site will be evaluated for their potential
to support wildlife movement corridors. Corridors are defined here as landscape features (such
as game trails, ridge lines, or drainages) within large natural habitat areas or along habitat linkages
between large open space areas that are used frequently by animals to facilitate movement. The
purpose of the corridor analysis is to identify and quantify wildlife movement corridors potentially
blocked or adversely affected by the proposed project and to use this information in developing
measures to mitigate these potential impacts. In addition, this analysis will assist in validating
and/or clarifying the existence of wildlife movement corridors within the project site, as determined
by previous biological studies in the region.
Documentation pertinent to wildlife movement corridors within, and in the vicinity of, the project site
will be compiled, reviewed, and analyzed. Information to be reviewed includes: 1) all data,
incidental observations, and other information (tracks, game trails, large mammal scat, etc.)
obtained during the previous surveys on the potential existence of wildlife movement corridors; 2) a
checklist for evaluating impacts to wildlife movement corridors (Beier and Loe 1992); and 3)
existing information and studies on wildlife movement corridors in the vicinity of the project site or
within southern California that would provide useful analytical and empirical information.
BonTerra Consulting will evaluate the connectivity of these open space areas to each other and
to the project site using existing GIS databases and the known locations of open space areas in
the project vicinity. The habitat linkages that connect these open space areas will be located and
characterized using topographic maps and aerial photographs. Landscape features that potentially
may facilitate wildlife movement within the open space areas surrounding and including the project
site also will be analyzed and characterized. Factors to be considered in this analysis include
topography, the type and location of vegetation cover, the presence of water, the juxtaposition of
open space areas with urban settings, the presence of preserved open space areas, and the
overall fragmentation of remaining open space areas in the vicinity of the project site. Areas that
potentially serve as regional or locally important wildlife movement corridors will be identified and
mapped.
Based on the information obtained from the preliminary analysis outlined above, areas that show
high potential to support a regional or locally important wildlife movement corridor will be surveyed
in the field to characterize and define the ability of each area to serve as a movement corridor.
Information to be evaluated includes vegetative cover, vegetative type, length and width of
corridors, amount of disturbance (grazing, non - native vegetation, and human activities), the
presence of water, and the general topography. These areas also will be studied to determine the
occurrence and level of use by target wildlife species (deer, mountain lion, fox, coyote, bobcat, and
badger). The evaluation will focus on a relative comparison of species diversity and activity levels
using combinations of daytime track surveys, nighttime spotlighting, and track stations to document
the presence, relative abundance, and frequency of use by target species. These areas also will
be field- checked for evidence (tracks, scat, burrows, nests, and direct observation) of use by non -
target animal species. The importance of each potential corridor with respect to regional wildlife
movement will be evaluated.
-� "r. Q C �r"
'
B2'....•�'`�
TASK IV BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT $21,805.00
A Biological Technical Report will be developed based on the results of various biological surveys,
analysis, and data compilation completed for the project to date, including those listed above
(Tasks I, II, and III). The report will describe: a) The methodology used to conduct the biological
surveys; b) a detailed description of the existing vegetation types and associated wildlife resources
on the project site; c) potential impacts from project development; and d) recommended mitigation
measures to reduce identified impacts to less than significant levels. At this time, BonTerra
Consulting has assumed that there is only one alterative (the proposed project) being addressed
in the Biological Technical Report.
If any alternatives need to be addressed, this work will be billed on a time and materials basis after
approval. The analysis will include the results of the tree survey previously conducted for the
project site, and will incorporate results of the focused California coastal gnatcatcher surveys. Due
to drought conditions, this scope of services does not include surveys for special status plant
species. As such, a finding of potentially significant will be made. Mitigation for these impacts will
include completion of the focused surveys, and mitigation that would be required if the species
were found to be present.
One draft report will be submitted to the project team for review and comment. Comments on the
draft will be addressed and one final version of the report will be prepared and submitted to
members of the project team.
To complete this task, the following materials need to be provided:
• Digital GIS files of the topographic map and project boundary, and if possible, digital files
of the aerial photograph;
• Digital GIS files of the impact footprint, including fuel modification areas and construction
access and staging areas; and
• Project description.
TASK V COASTAL CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER $44,720.00 (less $12,000 retainer)
Focused surveys for the coastal California gnatcatcher will be conducted in appropriate habitat in
the impact area (estimated to be 360 acres of sage scrub). Focused surveys will not be conducted
in the northern portion of the project site since this portion of the site will not be impacted. Surveys
for the gnatcatcher will follow the protocol developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
( USFWS) ( USFWS, 1997). These guidelines specify that surveys are required in areas of suitable
coastal sage scrub habitat by a permitted biologist. The USFWS prefer that surveys be conducted
during the breeding season; however, surveys can be conducted year- round. During the non -
breeding season (July 1 to March 14), nine surveys are required.
Tape recordings of coastal California gnatcatcher songs and other vocalizations will be played in
appropriate habitat to solicit a response. The locations where gnatcatchers are first observed will
be plotted on the appropriate aerial photograph or topographic map. The number of birds
(individuals or pairs) will be noted at each sighting. Data also will be collected on general habitat
characteristics for each gnatcatcher. The surveys will be conducted during appropriate weather
conditions generally between dawn and 11:00 a.m. Surveys will cover no more than 80 acres of
suitable habitat per day, according to USFWS survey protocol. This scope assumes that
approximately 360 acres of suitable habitat is present on the project site, and therefore, seven field
days would be required to cover the entire project site for each of the nine visits for a total of 63
field days.
B -3
"v adt
Upon completion of the survey effort, a letter report will be prepared on the survey findings. The
letter will include a methods section, a results section with location and descriptions of special
status species found, and implications of the presence in terms of CEQA and the federal
Endangered Species Act.
TASK VI WETLANDS DELINEATION $24,775.00
Existing environmental documentation of the project site and projects in the immediate vicinity will
be compiled and reviewed. Prior to field surveys, aerial photographs of the project site and
surrounding areas will be reviewed to understand the project site's biological/wetland resources and
the site's continuity to offsite resources (open space areas, parks, easements, urban areas, etc.).
BonTerra Consulting will conduct a site investigation to identify the existing conditions of the areas
considered to be within the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Based on current hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and
hydric soils, BonTerra Consulting will determine the acreage to be jurisdictional wetlands and /or
non - wetland "waters of the United States" and areas within a CDFG defined streambed with
associated riparian vegetation.
BonTerra Consulting will evaluate the functions and values of the existing wetland/riparian habitats
within the project area and then determine the appropriateness of habitat replacement in
compensation for the proposed activities. These replacement ratios would only be our "best guess"
at what the resource agencies will require upon review of the project information. As a result,
BonTerra Consulting will recommend the minimum ratio expected to mitigate impacts; however,
we also will identify the maximum ratios that could be requested by the resource agencies.
A wetland delineation report will be developed based on the results of various biological/wetland
surveys, analysis, and data compilation described above. The report will describe: a) the
methodology used to conduct the surveys; b) the results of the wetland delineation; and c) the
existing vegetation types and associated wildlife resources within the jurisdictional areas. The
report also will include a discussion of a recommended permitting strategy to work out the best
approach to submit and obtain the permits /agreements from the regulatory agencies. The draft
wetland report will be submitted to the project team for review and comment. Comments on the
draft will be addressed and three copies of the final version of the report will be prepared and re-
submitted.
TASK VII MEETINGS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT $5,105.00
Meetings will be attended by BonTerra Consulting to discuss the impact analysis and project
strategy. In addition, BonTerra Consulting will provide biological support services including, but not
limited to, review of the construction plans and cost estimates for mitigation work and other tasks
as necessary to project objectives.
TOTAL PROFESSIONAL FEES AND DIRECT EXPENSES $139,460.00
"-- "NC,
'kA v 4.w
�:
B -4
ATTACHMENT,
MW ®4usr�N- FOUSr4ssOC /4rES /N ' . , =
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 -7827
May 21, 2002
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
ATTENTION: Ms. Deborah Traffenstedt
TELEPHONE (714) 667 -0496
FAX (714) 667 -7952
E -mail: mail @austinfoust.com
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL - NORTH PARK VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11
TRAFFIC STUDY
Dear Ms. Traffenstedt:
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) is pleased to submit the attached proposal which outlines a scope of
services to prepare a traffic impact analysis for North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11 located northeast
of the City of Moorpark in the City's Sphere of Influence. The traffic study is intended for submittal to the
City in support of the overall Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that is being prepared for the project. Our
suggested scope of services, which has been prepared based on discussions with yourself and Dana Privitt
of BonTerra Consulting, includes updating the City's traffic forecasting model, preparing an EIR level traffic
impact analysis for the project, and participating in the EIR public review process (i.e., through attendance
at public hearings held on the project and the preparation of responses to traffic related comments submitted
on the Draft EIR).
Thank you for the opportunity to be involved in this important transportation planning effort. Please feel
free to contact me with any questions regarding our proposed scope of work.
Sincerely,
Kendall E. Elmer
Associate
Attachment
cc: liana Privitt (BonTerra Consulting)
02NorthParkV illage.wpd
C,+v'1a'� �J'
PROPOSAL
NORTH PARK VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 TRAFFIC STUDY
Prepared by:
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
2020 North Tustin Avenue
Santa Ana, California 92701
(714) 667 -0496
May 21, 2002
Proposal
NORTH PARK VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 TRAFFIC STUDY
The following is a scope of services proposed by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) to conduct
a traffic impact analysis for North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11, a development project that is proposed
in unincorporated eastern Ventura County in the City of Moorpark Sphere of Influence. The traffic analysis
is intended to provide the necessary traffic data for the impact analysis section of the EIR that is being
prepared for the project.
OVERVIEW
The North Park Village Specific Plan No. 1 I project is located on a 3,547 acre site that is proposed
to be developed with 1,665 residential dwelling units on approximately 744 acres of the site together with
supporting uses including a three acre community retail center, a 12 acre school site, a 30 acre youth sports
park, an eight acre neighborhood park, and a 60 acre recreational lake. Approximately 22 acres would
potentially be dedicated to allow for a satellite high school campus and /or future expansion of Moorpark
Community College facilities, and approximately 2,600 acres would be reserved as a nature preserve and/or
permanent open space.
Project access is proposed from Campus Park Drive and /or Collins Drive into the project site, and
through the construction of a new roadway and freeway interchange to State Route 118 (SR -118),
approximately one mile east of the existing Collins Drive /SR -118 interchange. A four -lane arterial roadway
would connect the interchange to the project site, as well as provide access into Moorpark College. The
interchange itself would be subject to separate environmental documentation processed by the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans).
The project traffic impact analysis will address two primary phases of project development, a first
phase in which Campus Park Drive and/or Collins Drive would provide the only means of access to the site,
and a buildout phase in which access would be provided from Campus Park Drive and the new SR -118
interchange. A maximum of 503 dwelling units are proposed to be developed in the first phase. However
if the traffic analysis identifies that acceptable levels of service are not able to be maintained on the existing
roadway in the vicinity of the project with this level of project development, then the traffic analysis will
propose a lesser number of dwelling units for the first phase. It will be assumed that no level of project
development beyond the first phase will be permitted without the completion of the new SR -118 interchange.
02NorthPark V illagc.wpd
fir'► a°� a^n
'Aw 'v m �•
The first phase of the project will be analyzed based on existing (2002) and interim year (2007)
conditions. The buildout phase of the project will be analyzed under long -range (2020) conditions based on
buildout of the General Plans of the Cities of Moorpark and Simi Valley and the County of Ventura. In
addition to analyzing interim year and long -range conditions with no development assumed on the project
site, long -range conditions will also be analyzed for up to two project alternatives, for example a reduced
development alternative and a current General Plan alternative that assumes a level of development that is
consistent with the existing County of Ventura General Plan zoning designations. Also, up to two interim
year circulation alternatives will be analyzed based on first phase development of the project.
Existing traffic conditions will be analyzed in the traffic study based on traffic count data, whereas
future (2007 and 2020) traffic forecasts for the study will be prepared using the City of Moorpark Traffic
Analysis Model (MTAM). The MTAM has not undergone a comprehensive update since 1994 when the
model was re- calibrated based on observed traffic count data collected that year. Since that time, a
significant amount of development (and associated infrastructure improvements) has occurred within the
City of Moorpark and the surrounding areas. Also, the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC)
has updated their countywide traffic model from which the MTAM is derived. It is therefore recommended
that the MTAM be updated as part of the traffic analysis work program for the proposed project.
For each of the traffic analysis timeframes, average daily traffic (ADT) volumes and AM and PM
peak hour intersection volumes will be produced, and suitable mitigation will be identified for impacted
locations on the roadway system where the City's standard level of service is not provided and/or
maintained. The results of the technical analysis will be incorporated into a traffic report. The report will
be prepared in a format suitable for incorporation into the overall EIR, and it will provide a comprehensive
description of the impact analysis and of the findings and recommendations for project mitigation measures.
WORK TASKS
The following are the work tasks that will be carried out for the traffic impact analysis.
TASK 1. EXISTING TRAFFIC DATA
In this task, existing traffic count data will be collected for use in the traffic model calibration and
in the existing conditions portion of the project traffic impact analysis. Information that will be needed
includes ADT volumes (24 -hour counts) on roadway segments and AM and PM peak hour intersection
2 02NorthParkVi11age.wpd
1% C) 7 2
counts throughout the City. The traffic count data will be collected before the end of the school year, and
it will be compiled in a format suitable for application in the traffic model update and project impact
analysis. An illustration and tabular summary of the locations where traffic count data is proposed to be
collected is attached at the end of this proposal.
TASK 2. TRAFFIC MODEL UPDATE
The Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model (MTAM) is currently calibrated to 1994 conditions and
produces forecasts for a year 2015 horizon year. In this work task, the model will be re- calibrated to 2002
conditions and the forecast horizon year will be extended to 2020 which is consistent with the horizon year
of the countywide traffic model that was recently updated by the VCTC. Two key sets of input data are
needed in order to update the model. One is the traffic count data that will be collected in Task 1. The other
is existing (2002) and future (2007 and 2020) land use data that will need to be provided by the City. To
assist the City in their development of the land use database, AFA will provide traffic zone maps and a
spreadsheet summary of the 1994, 2005 and 2015 zonal land use data that is used in the current version of
the model.
The basic steps involved in the re- calibration of the model include the extraction of regional travel
pattern data from VCTC's countywide traffic model, the calibration of the 2002 version of the model against
observed traffic counts, and the preparation of 2007 and 2020 future traffic forecasts based on the City's
2007 and 2020 land use projections.
TASK 3. PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND TRAFFIC REPORT
In this task the traffic impact analysis for the North Park Village project will be carried out and the
comprehensive traffic analysis report will be prepared. At the outset, the scope and methodology for traffic
impact analysis will be reviewed with the Cities of Moorpark and Simi Valley and the County of Ventura.
The updated traffic model will be utilized to produce traffic forecasts for each scenario that is to be analyzed,
and as soon as the traffic forecast data becomes available, it will be furnished to the City and/or BonTerra
for use in other impact assessments such as air quality and noise. Draft versions (up to two) of the traffic
study report will be submitted to the City and BonTerra for review prior to producing a final traffic analysis
report.
02NorthPark Village.wpd
.f1,
TASK 4. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
In this work task, AFA will prepare responses to traffic- related comments submitted on the project
Draft EIR. The budget for this task is estimated since the extent and magnitude of the comments is
unknown. The budget will be re- evaluated once the extent of the comments is known, and a budget
amendment request will be submitted if necessary.
TASK 5. ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
During the project, AFA staff will attend up to six regular meetings and work sessions with the City
of Moorpark, up to two other agency /City staff meetings, up to three Planning Commission hearings and up
to three City Council hearings.
COST ESTIMATE
The work is proposed to be completed on a time and materials basis for a fee not to exceed $76,300
based on the estimated personnel allocation and costs per work task summarized in Table 1. This estimate
includes a $16,000 cost item for the collection of traffic count data.
SCHEDULE
Table 2 summarizes the overall schedule for carrying out the work tasks outlined in this proposed
scope of services. While the table lists the anticipated time duration for each individual work task within
the overall 15 week schedule, the actual starting date for Task 2 and beyond will be dependant on the receipt
of the traffic model land use database that is to be provided by the City.
4 02NordtParkVillage.wpd
'fir V +,w
Table 1
COST ESTIMATE
1. MANHOURS AND COSTS BY LABOR CATEGORY
Classification Rate
Hours
Cost
Associate $140
135
$18,900
Transportation Engineer $95
110
$10,450
Transportation Analyst (1) $90
90
$8,100
Transportation Analyst (2) $80
140
$11,200
Transportation Analyst (3) $70
100
$7,000
Technical /Clerical $60
70
$4.200
Sub -Total
$59,850
Direct Expenses: Travel, reproduction, delivery, etc.
$450
Traffic counts *
$16,000
TOTAL
$76,300
2. COST BREAKDOWN BY TASK
Task 1. Existing Traffic Data
$1,600
Task 2. Traffic Model Update
$13,600
Task 3. Prepare Traffic Analysis and Traffic Report
$30,700
Task 4. Response to Comments
$3,650
Task 4. Attendance at Meetings and Public Hearings
$10,300
Sub -Total
$57,550
Direct Expenses: Travel, reproduction, delivery, etc.
$450
Traffic counts *
$16,000
TOTAL
$76,300
* Includes manual counts at 26 intersections and 24 -hour machine counts at 36
roadway links (see
attached table and illustration for a summary of the locations where count data
is proposed to be
collected).
5 02NorthParkVillage.wpd
C ��
Table 2
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Work Task Duration
Task 1. Existing Traffic Data
Weeks 1 -5
Task 2. Traffic Model Update
Weeks 6 -9
Task 3. Project Traffic Analysis and Traffic Report
Weeks 10 -15
Task 4. Response to Comments
Two weeks after
receipt of comments
Task 5. Attendance at Meetings and Public Hearings
Weeks 1 -15 and
as needed thereafter
* The City's development of the traffic model land use database would also occur during this period.
02NorthParkV illage.wpd
0
E;. A
Legend
24 -11our Count Location
• AM & PM Intersection Count Location
Proposal - North Park Village Specific Plan No. 11
Traffic Study
MOORPARK TRAFFIC ANALYSIS MODEL (MTAM) UPDATE
PROPOSED TRAFFIC COUNT COLLECTION PROGRAM
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
380026CountProgram.dwg
Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model (MTAM) Update
Proposed Traffic Count Collection Program
24 Hour Machine Count Locations
1. Broadway west of Walnut Canyon Rd
2. Campus Park Dr west of Collins Dr
3. Campus Park Dr east of Collins Dr
4. Collins Dr north of SR -118 *
5. Collins Dr north of Campus Park Dr
6. Gabbert Rd north of Los Angeles Ave (SR -118)
7. High St east of Moorpark Ave
8. Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) west of Grimes Cyn Rd
9. Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) west of Tierra Rejada Rd
10. Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) east of Tierra Rejada Rd
11. Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) west of Moorpark Ave
12. Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) west of Spring Rd
13. New Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) east of Spring Rd
14. New Los Angeles Ave (SR -118) east of Miller Rd
15. Los Angeles Ave east of Spring Rd
16. Los Angeles Ave south of SR -118 @ Princeton Ave
17. Los Angeles Ave east of Collins Dr *
18. Moorpark Ave north of Los Angeles Ave (SR -118)
19. Moorpark Ave north of High St
20. Moorpark Rd south of Tierra Rejada Rd
21. Peach Hill Rd east of Spring Rd
22. Poindexter Ave west of Moorpark Ave
23. Princeton Ave north of SR -118 *
24. Miller Rd south of New Los Angeles Ave
25. Miller Rd north of Tierra Rejada Rd
26. Spring Rd north of Tierra Rejada Rd
27. Spring Rd south of New Los Angeles Ave
28. Spring Rd north of New Los Angeles Ave
29. Tierra Rejada Rd south of Los Angeles Ave
30. Tierra Rejada Rd west of Peach Hill Rd
31. Tierra Rejada Rd west of Spring Rd
32. Tierra Rejada Rd west of Miller Rd
33. Tierra Rejada Rd west of Moorpark Rd
34. Tierra Rejada Rd west of SR -23
35. Tierra Rejada Rd east of SR -23
36. Walnut Canyon Rd north of Casey Rd
AM and PM Manual Turn Movement Count Locations
1. Broadway & Walnut Canyon Rd
2. Princeton Ave & Campus Park Dr
3. Collins Dr & Campus Park Dr *
4. Princeton Ave & SR -118 westbound ramps
5. Princeton Ave & SR -118 eastbound ramps
6. Collins Dr & SR -118 westbound ramps
7. Collins Dr & SR -118 eastbound ramps
8. Walnut Canyon Rd & Casey Rd
9. Moorpark Ave & High St
10. Spring Rd & High St
11. Moorpark Ave & Poindexter Ave
12. Gabbert Rd/Tierra Rejada Rd & Los Angeles Ave
13. Moorpark Ave & Los Angeles Ave
14. Spring Rd & Los Angeles Ave
15. Miller Rd & New Los Angeles Ave
16. Spring Rd & Peach Hill Rd
17. Tierra Rejada Rd & Countrywood Dr
18. Mountain Trail St & Tierra Rejada Rd
19. Mountain Meadow Dr & Tierra Rejada Rd
20. Walnut Creek Rd & Tierra Rejada Rd
21. Peach Hill Rd & Tierra Rejada Rd
22. Spring Rd & Tierra Rejada Rd
23. Miller Rd & Tierra Rejada Rd
24. Moorpark Rd & Tierra Rejada Rd
25. SR -23 southbound ramps & Tierra Rejada Rd
26. SR -23 northbound ramps & Tierra Rejada Rd
* These locations will be counted in late May /early June when public schools are in regular session and Moorpark
College is in summer session and will be recounted in September when public schools and Moorpark College are
in regular session (the September counts will be applied in the final the final traffic model development and project
traffic analysis and the earlier counts will be used to estimate the amount of traffic that Moorpark College adds to
the surrounding circulation system).
02North P ark V I I I age. wp d
C �f! Fes' 6 as 5 ^f
4suu L'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
Steven Kueny, City Manager
ISM ID. G.
ran : tnr ,rr P � qt1 fog___
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Consider Modification to City Sign Code to Allow
Certain Signs to Publicize Nonprofit Groups' Events
BACKGROUND:
The City's current sign code does
signs in the public rights -of -way
City purposes. Provisions of the
of signs on private property. A
signs and banners to publicize a
registration in the case of youth
signs are not permitted by the si
enforcement and abatement action
DISCUSSION:
not allow for the placement of
(ROW) for other than official
sign code govern the placement
number of nonprofit groups use
fundraising event or
sports' organizations. Such
gn code and are subject to
by the City.
As referenced above, the temporary signs and banners used by
nonprofit groups are not permitted by the City's sign code. A
number of groups have used these to publicize their group's
event. The purpose of this report is to determine if the City
Council is interested in legalizing such signs and banners. If
there is interest in allowing such signage, this matter should
be referred to the Planning Commission, which is already
scheduled to review the sign code. The most similar situation
currently addressed in the sign code is Boutique and Garage /Yard
sale signs as contained in Section 17.40.120 of the Municipal
Code.
If the Council authorizes this matter to be referred to the
Planning Commission, it may also want to include the limited use
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Modification to City Sign Code
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 2
of public rights -of -way for boutique and garage /yard sales and
temporary real estate open house signs.
With regard to the potential authorization for nonprofit groups'
signs, the Council and Planning Commission would want to
consider a number of items including:
1. Administration of the sign permit process
2. Banners v. signs
3. Size limits
4. Location parameters
5. Number of signs per event
6. Number of times per year per location and per organization
7. The ability to limit it to Moorpark based nonprofits
8. Time frames before the event and for sign removal
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Refer the use of signs /banners by Moorpark based nonprofit
groups and use of public rights -of -way for certain signs to the
Planning Commission as part of the prior action to review the
sign code.
SK:db
M: \cityshare \citymgr \everyone \ccagenda \Mod to City Sign Code 0530 2002
6?, FZ P'7 afp,
ITEM - 106 H 0
r
k
ACT
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL-
AGENDA REPORT BY. .E�f ~e` --~
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager��
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and
Objectives for Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Attached are the proposed Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals
and Objectives for FY 2002/2003. It shows the proposed changes
from FY 2001/2002 in legislative format. As part of the
approval last year, the City Council also designated the "Top
Ten (10) Priorities."
It is generally acknowledged that with current staff levels,
there are many more objectives listed than can be reasonably
expected to be accomplished in the year. In fact, many of the
objectives will take several years to fully complete. A written
status report on the various priorities and objectives is not
included as part of this report. The City Council Monthly
Report provides a status on most of these items as well as other
staff work efforts. Staff will respond to specific Council
questions when this matter is considered.
In prior years, the proposed objectives were submitted to the
City Council as part of the annual budget process and usually
reviewed informally as part of the budget deliberations. Formal
consideration of the objectives usually followed adoption of the
budget.
As part of the review of last year's objectives, the Council
concurred to consider the FY 2002/2003 objectives prior to
preparation of the budget with the purpose of having more
correlation between the Council approved objectives and City
Manager proposed budget.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 2
To this end, the Council received a status report in February
2002. No direction was given to staff at that time. The City
Council subsequently met in separate, joint meetings with the
Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission and
discussed the City's priorities. Some of those discussions are
included in the proposed priorities, goals, and objectives.
The report to the Council for the February 6, 2002 meeting
included a list of 36 other potential objectives. Of these,
four have been implemented or included on the list of proposed
objectives, as follows:
• Expand subsidized taxi service to include low income
Moorpark Senior Citizens
• GIS
• Work with Ventura County Flood Control District on plans
for Arroyo Simi improvements in Moorpark
• Evaluate use alternatives for parcel deeded to City by SDI
in Virginia Colony.
The remaining 32 items and 6 additional items (Nos. 33 -38) are
as follows:
1. Conduct a community -wide survey to measure the level of
satisfaction residents feel about City services, develop a
program to regularly solicit public input and feedback
regarding service satisfaction, and continue to implement a
system to track customer requests and complaints.
2. Tape a minimum of two (2) special City- sponsored events or
meetings for replay supporting public information and
community promotion efforts and evaluate the feasibility of
taping a video about Moorpark City government.
3. Design and construct electrical system for decorative
lighting on High Street, utilizing recently constructed
underground conduit system.
4. Implement Neighborhood Preservation Program.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 3
5. Propose legislation to allow cities and counties more
discretion in establishing speed limits that are
enforceable by Radar.
6. Conduct an Organization and Management Study and prepare an
implementation plan.
7. Analyze potential for franchising of telephone services
providers that provide cable television services.
8. Taping monthly announcements of upcoming city- sponsored
activities for replay on the City Government Channel.
9. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a teen center.
10. Apply for "Tree City U.S.A." designation after adoption of
Amended Tree Ordinance.
11. Evaluate feasibility of lighting additional parks and
recreation facilities including Arroyo Vista Community Park
(AVCP) multi - purpose court and second softball field, two
basketball courts at Mountain Meadows Park, and proposed
skatepark.
12. Develop inventory of natural open space properties owned by
City and HOA's and other privately owned property
restricted by conservation easement or other development
condition or limitation.
13. Install winter holiday decorations on street light poles at
various locations in the City.
14. Adopt formal traffic policies.
15. Install a compressed natural gas (CNG) pumping station for
City and public use in Moorpark.
16. Conduct an Arbor Day event.
17. Expand Poindexter Park.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 4
18. Utility undergrounding projects.
19. Canine park.
20. Youth scholarship program for City recreation classes.
21. Specific Plan for area west of Virginia Colony on south
side of Los Angeles Avenue.
22. Rental Inspection Ordinance.
23. Expand Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and gym.
24. Work with property owner to improve west City entry.
25. Develop plan for recreational use of detention basin in
Specific Plan No. 1.
26. Electronic message sign.
27. Install traffic signal at eastbound SR 118 Collins
Drive /Los Angeles Avenue off ramp.
28. Work with Historical Society on finalizing a site for its
proposed facility.
29. Develop policies for Arts in Public Places expenditures.
30. Develop guidelines for fine and cultural arts expenditures.
31. Install Tierra Rejada Road median landscaping.
32. Landscaping improvements and signage for Arroyo Vista
Community Park entry.
33. Evaluate feasibility of second vehicular access to Arroyo
Vista Community Park.
34. Landscape north side of Poindexter Avenue from Gabbert Road
east to vicinity of Chaparral School.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 5
35. Estabish apricot orchard at one or more locations for
community's historical purposes.
36. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a publicly owned,
privately operated equestrian center.
37. Work with Caltrans to install landscaping and decorative
pavement at Tierra Rejada Road /SR 23 ramps.
38. Develop program to assist City employees as first -time
buyers to purchase housing in the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives.
SK:db
Attachment
M: \City Share /City Manager /Everyone /Goals & Obj to HCC 0605 2002
C; � ILI
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and
Objectives
FY 2002 -1/2003-2
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and Objectives
For FY 20024:/2003-2
CITY MISSION STATEMENT
Striving to preserve and improve the quality of life in Moorpark.
TOP TEN (10) PRIORITIES
1. Construct new City Hall and Corporate Yard Facility. (F2 &
F27— F28 &F-35) —
2. Construct police station. (F21 -2)
3. Comprehensive update of General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Elements and adopt updated OSCAR Element to
insure internal consistency among all elements of the
General Plan. (G5, G7 & G12)
4. Widen Los Angeles Avenue /New Los Angeles Avenue (SR118) to
six travel lanes from Tierra Rejada Road to SR 23 Freeway
with a raised median and traffic signal interconnect system.
(C3 a) , b) , c) , & –d) , &–e) & :--G4 )
5. Truck ban on Los Angeles /New Los Angeles Avenue (SR118) and
permanent truck scale facility west of the City. (C6 & C8--&
G4:())
6. Widening of Moorpark Avenue /Walnut Canyon Road from Los
Angeles Avenue (SR118) to north City limits. (C12 & C14–&
C-4-r.1) -
7. Construct Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II. (F3 & F30 -1)
8. Increase City's General Fund revenue through enhancement of
existing revenue sources including business attraction and
retention programs and establishment of additional revenue
sources. (D1, D3, D7, D9, D16, D17, D18, D19, F11, F16, &
F37) Censtruetom- eemmunity aq:;ati e f ae_l it . (F S
9. Enhance open space and greenbelt areas and determine
feasibility of establishing a trail system along the Arroyo
Simi and– ad-jaeent te– Miller Park, and work with other public
agencies to develop a comprehensive Arroyo Simi Management
Plan that incorporates flood control, habitat
preservation /restoration, and recreation components. (G6 &
G17$)
10. Adept - reusing Element and– D_develop and implement program to
encourage new multi and single family housing on
underutilized sites within the Downtown Specific Plan area
and increase the number of affordable housing units. (B7 &
FG9)
2
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
A. Expand and encourage community involvement in establishing
the general policies of the City and increase the public =s
understanding of local government operations.
1: r -evide edrrent infermatien _ event-s—,
prey -r-affis sues, and pe -ewes -- -hr gh - ---i.e City's
Ti 1 rnet Hefae — Page, (jeyern iieT i -,bl e eL, e1 ffi_rY s3ee
signs, re ss -releases, and n-ewsl e t ters . (ACM)
On -going responsibility.
2. Develop a general emergency preparedness manual for
distribution to Moorpark residents. The manual will
outline how to prepare for, and what to do following a
disaster. (ACM)
1 pertaining t1f
cue r-v i e co- e'n %-h e-City's n t- eriiei
Part of A.6.
4. Evaluate the feasibility and legality of allowing
electronic messages from the public to be received by
the Mayor and Councilmembers during City Council
meetings. (AS & CC)
5. Evaluate the feasibility of a paperless City Council
agenda packet. (CC & AS)
6. Develop and implement an enhanced city web site that
provides the public with a variety of information about
city services including separate web page for
recreation programs. (AS)
:7. Obta =rnreeessary °nt ate- train City ,, �-
__ f f to
llew rmmedi at e entry e f i-n f e rffia t i en t e be b reade ash en
geve � aent aeees-s eable ehan-^� (ne,-
Not currently feasible.
B. Revitalize downtown Moorpark with a focus on Nigh Street and
the surrounding business district and residential
neighborhoods, which includes consideration of public rail
transit, potential for increased residential density, and
governmental and related public uses.
3
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
1. Coordinate the City's efforts to resolve concerns with
day laborers. (MRA)
2. Complete project to landscape the railroad frontage
property along Moorpark Avenue, including the vacant
area west of the south Metrolink parking lot. (CS &MRA)
3. Install landscaping and downtown identification signs
at entrances to High Street. (MRA)
4. Complete the conceptual design for Spring Road from the
railroad tracks south to Los Angeles Avenue, to
determine the design (sidewalk, travel lanes, bike
lanes, medians, parkways, landscaping, entry signs,
etc.) and right -of -way requirements. (PW)
RedevelepfRent gei ^ l -e'- t d 'preper-ty - m=rHigh Street
eensisten - with Do'ddnte Jim Speeif-ie Plan. (MoT1
Review Downtown Specific Plan and consider modification
to current vision, policies, land use, zoning and
development standards and uses for City /Agency owned
properties. (MRA & CD)
6. _ et to
cv net. ruti t—cc -ter ='e s t- a't -i'e n en
Complete.
7. Develop program to encourage new multi and single
family housing projects on underutilized sites within
the Downtown Specific Plan area and consider
feasibility of City /MRA acquisition of selected sites.
(MRA)
8. Install improved street lighting on designated downtown
residential streets. (MRA)
9. Prepare amendment to Moorpark Redevelopment Plan to
extend eminent domain_ authority and related ballot
measure. (MRA)
10. Modify land use and zoning and prepare related
documents_ and construct three affordable housing units
on Agency owned site at Millard Street and Los Angeles
Avenue. ( MRA & CD)
4
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
Cv'to' crv9
11. Construct temporary parking lot improvements on Agency_
owned Hiqh Street property. (MRA & PW)
12. Acquire site and construct mini -park within_ Downtown
Specific Plan area. (MRA)
C. Improve traffic circulation and mitigate impacts on the
movement of traffic through the City.
1. Work with Caltrans to complete a number of projects
including: (PW)
a) -- Censtruel New des - Angeles Avenue Bridje widening;
a Obtain Caltrans approval for construction of a
raised medium on Los Angeles Avenue/New Los
Angeles Avenue from west city limits to SR23
Freeway. - - - - - -- —Y
b) Installation of a traffic signal interconnect
system and permissive /restrictive left turns at
certain intersections to provide improved signal
coordination and traffic flow on New Los Angeles
Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue;
c) Acquire right -of -way and widen Los Angeles Avenue
at Beltramo Road;
d) Complete design and acquire right -of -way to widen
Los Angeles Avenue between Spring Road and
Moorpark Avenue.
2. Aequire right ef way and prepare design fer adding ene
eenter ffiedian en New Les Angeles Avenue and ies An��el
A;,Fen:ue [GR 1181 between the Reiate 2�� freeway and Tier
Angeles Avenue te s&athbeund Tierra Rejada Read. (PW)
-- 1. above.-,
3. Complete report on the Citywide Traffic Mitigation fee
and develop more precise information on the proposed
east /west route that addresses local issues, including
retention of consultant for an implementation plan
pertaining to the level of improvement required to
serve as an east /west transportation corridor, cost,
funding alternatives and plan for phased
implementation. (PW & CD)
4. Design traffic signal interconnect system on Tierra
Rejada Road from Spring Road to Countrywood Drive and
5
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
( ) by2110..d0
evaluate potential use of permissive /restrictive left
turns at certain intersections (PW).
5. Initiate right -of -way acquisition for the improvement
of Los Angeles Avenue (East) from Condor Drive west to
1,500 feet east of Spring Road. (PW)
6. obtain a truck ban on SR 118 (except freeway portion).
(PW)
7. Install bus benches and shelters at selected City bus
stops. (CS)
8. Work with VCTC, CHP, Caltrans, and County of Ventura to
site a permanent truck scale facility west of the City.
(PW & ACM)
9. Monitor Caltrans' efforts to develop improvement plan
for widening of SR 118 west of Moorpark City limits
including proposed improvements at the SR 118 and SR
34 /Donlon Road intersection. (PW)
10. Pursue grant funding and design for the modification,
improvement, and widening of the rail crossings at
Spring Road and at Moorpark Avenue. (PW)
11. Proceed with street realignment and signalization at
the intersection of Flinn Avenue, Second Street and
Spring Road. (PW)
12. Proceed with the development of the design and
acquisition of additional right -of -way necessary to
provide two southbound lanes on Moorpark Avenue (SR 23)
between Casey Road and Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118).
(PW)
13. Pti=epxa s2-',- ' transit
funded -with — TCC�J=- 6-rz - fn6-I3-3= •E's' —TcSr
Complete.
14. Coordinate efforts of various developers to construct
improvements to Walnut Canyon Road (SR 23) from Casey
Road to north City limits to provide lane widening,
paved shoulders, and striped median. (PW & CD)
15. Complete report on potential alternative for SR23
between Broadway and Los Angeles Avenue (PW, CE & CD)
G
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
D. Strengthen the City's fiscal stability and long -range
financial growth.
1. Develop proposed Business License Program for
consideration by the City Council. (AS)
2. ate 5 yeai= finaneial prejcam-}ens . (AS,-
ComDlete.
rac,c.ioizr^vguc.rT and
b:as resses, ^l,±ding- the-pPrepareatie= e a City
marketing brochure and related materials for business
attraction and retention. (MRA)
4. When - - - assist private preperty ewners o
-offtmereial and - - -- prep- - -et th-eir
„..
on-going responsibility.
5. Revise park land dedication ordinance and Park Master
Plan and evaluate adequacy of current parks
improvements fee for commercial and industrial
development. Evaluate the feasibility of establishing
an endowment fund that would allow for equipment
replacement at parks. (CS)
6. Submit the seven -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
for City Council's consideration by December 31, 2002.
(PW)
7. Complete a comprehensive fee study for development
related fees for consistency with current direct and
indirect costs. (AS)
relative zi- a- i-ncr- p'cri- nirc'c
ie-ned f ems- industrial :uses. (C94-
Complete.
8. Implement Cost Recovery Program for Code Enforcement.
(CD & AS)
7
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
Develop improved cost and time accounting addressing
when to use flat fee amounts instead of deposits for
planning and engineering fees and develop real time
billing rates for all departments. (AS & CD)
11.10. Develop plan for expenditure of Traffic Systems
Management monies collected from development projects
for improvement of air quality. (CSC & CD)
12: -11. Implement program to insure departmental
responsibility and accountability for maintaining the
inventory and protecting the City's fixed assets. (AS)
13-12. Develop an equitable basis for requirement on new
development projects to provide Affordable Housing
units and or pay in lieu fees and for calculating the
amount of Traffic Systems Management (TSM) fees. (AS
CD)
14. Implement a fee to be collected prior to final building
permit approval to pay the City's costs for scanning
approved building permits and plans into an electronic
imaging system. (CC & CD)
15. Begin process to implement GASB 34 requirements to
record infrastructure as capital assets and modify
annual financial reports to include a government -wide
component. (AS, PW & CS)
16. Evaluate potential uses for parcels deeded to Cit
- - - --
SDI. ( ACM ) - -- -- - - - - -- - - --
17.___ Conduct _Citywide _mail b_ allot to seek increase in
assessments for street lighting and landscaping. (CS &
PW)
18. Develop a City impound fee for processing of towed
----- - - - - --
vehicles. (CM & PD)
19. Develop a fee program for businesses requiring
inspection to insure NPDES compliance. (PW & AS)
E. Reduce the potential for juvenile crime through intervention
and prevention efforts.
1. Develop a Youth Master Plan in collaboration with the
various agencies that serve Moorpark youth, including
8
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
C Ct p�
�✓ `tr- � 2 t,,• jai'
MUSD and Moorpark Boys and Girls Club, and interested
residents to identify existing needs, services and
programs. (CS)
2. Work with community groups and school district to
address violence intervention and drug use among
teenagers. (PD & CS)
3. Determine a location and construct at ne -ey twe pa
er ether site a permanent skatepark. (CS)
4. implement bus seryiee -fie - the- beaeI9 tw l- a week
during Tli st rl___ (T/fUSD)
CC �-�n^ T/1� v�(r �T�T r�, '�'f � �1TVV1 L1 tJ \ �.J 31/
Complete; Council has authorized County Fair Bus.
F. Enhance the delivery of services and expand program
efficiencies.
1. Coordinate City's efforts for proposed transfer of
Waterworks District No. 1 to the City. (CM)
2. Develop conceptual design proposal for new City Hall,
council chambers, teen �-��ter, -and other government
offices and complete necessary property acquisition.-
. a ar � initial ,
eensistent with after Mr --
'he -Spaee Needs - S-ticidy:- (ACM)
3. Prepare a proposed construction phasing plan for
development of Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II.
(CS)
4. Prepare standard development project conditions of
approval used for each type of entitlement. (CD)
5. Update the Subdivision Ordinance and present it to the
City Council for adoption by December 31, 2001. (CD)
6. Complete a policy and procedures manual for code
enforcement activities. (CD)
7. Develop Citing Procedures for City Council action and
prepare an ordinance making any violation of a City
Ordinance subject to an administrative fine or penalty.
(CD & CA)
01
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
? %"'* s
8. Prepare Guidelines for and iFRplemen-t— procedures fer
review and inspee-1-4-e.n. ef Landscape and Irrigation
Plans. €ate- develepm (CD)
9. Update -- He- usi- ng� Element —and - p-re -e es s related GPA a__
envireFAnev,t7a-1 deeiament by Geteber 31, 2001. (GI
Complete.
10. Prepare an Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual
and revise Purchasing Ordinance and related procedures.
(AS)
11. Complete negotiation of cable television franchise
renewals with Adelphia for City Council consideration
by June 30, 20032-. (ACM)
12. Prepare administrative policies for use of e -mail and
Internet access by City employees. (AS)
13. Evaluate the feasibility of on -line park reservations
and registration for recreation programs. (CS & AS)
14.
eConsider options for funding construction and
maintenance of a community aquatic facility. (CS)
15. In conjunction with other
with Catholic Charities to
Moorpark. (MRA)
interested agencies, work
locate a permanent.site in
16. Complete negotiation of refuse franchise for City
Council consideration including provision for automated
service by December 31, 2002._Geteber 31, "'— GO!; - -(CS)
17. Evaluate City's law enforcement needs and priorities
and related allocation of resources. (CM & PD)
Rvaluat-e-eptieenss te enhanee delivery ef law enfereement
ex,pansie e. ve-unteer serviees. ..
Complete.
19. I --L l --- -- -- expanded use -ate c- ei� eards z fer
Defer.
10
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
20. 9bta4Br add-itional spa-ee- ateurrent leeatien ef- Fifeerpa�
(T
Complete.
21. Develop &,,,-d ng plan aftd conceptual and final - design
for police station and determine feasibility of siting
California Highway Patrol and emergency services at
same location. (ACM & PD)
22. Evaluate feasibility and implement additional energy
conservation measures for City facilities including the
option for photovoltaic stem and determine
feasibility and cost for electrical generator to serve
Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. (AS & CS)
23. Ca ve + e3Eisting b: j a i permits dp plans to an
l t-r i reeerd. (Ge c TS)
In- progress and now part of on -going responsibility.
24. Update City's Record Retention Schedule to conform to
federal and state law and prepare for increased
destruction of paper records. (CC)
Ha-l1- Annems -to e3Eisting eleetr-ieal- g-enera-ter. (C-S)
Complete.
26. Develep State GLEEPS gra fidnds _~rl c ndittdre plan ter
pe l i ee related tie hne l egg pe sew --( AS & P9)
On- going.
27. Develop design plans_ candidate- site- and eest-s- for a
new Corporate Yard for the Public Works and Community
Services maintenance functions. (PW & CS)
28. Develep and implement plan te assign _
;
r.Q�, e duties to Veeter Ge trel Diyi sien. —(ES,-)
Complete.
29. Install mutt mitt dispensers at all City parks. (CS)
30. Construct second restroom /concession /storage facility
at Arroyo Vista Community Park by September 30, 20021.
—(CS)
11
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
�.r ki' .o' 'a.✓ c.JS
31. Construct a play lot and half court basketball court at
Villa Campesina Park. (CS)
32. Install new playground equipment in both play lot areas
at Mountain Meadows Park. (CS)
33. Install new park name monument signs at Villa Campesina
Park, Mountain Meadows Park, and Tierra Rejada Park.
(CS)
34. Aeq re preperty needed - f e r -C ; t y Hall, e ewe rate -yard-
Part of other objectives.
35. Deterfr- e feasibility an a cost fee a eetrle =1 Jerer_ te=
t-e- se�o=e -Ai= eye Vista Reereat -ien Center.
Part of F. 22.
36. Implement initial phase of GIS application. (AS)
37._ Implement new database system for tracking, analyzing
and reporting developer deposits and charges including
staff time charges. (AS & CD)
38._ Prepare municipal code amendment_ granting authority to
issue citations for violation of animal control
rovisions of the Municipal Code. (CS)
G. Reinforce and enhance Moorpark =s attractive community
character and safeguard its desirable resources.
1. Work with Ventura County Fire Prevention District to
consider siting a fire station in the Campus Park area
of the City. (ACM)
2. Plan and conduct an emergency response exercise
involving the City Council and a simulated emergency
response drill and update City's SEMS Multi Hazard
Functional Plan (Emergency Plan) and improve
communication capabilities of the City's EOC. (ACM &
PD)
3. Develop Ordinances and related policies and program
guidelines for collection and use of Art in Public
Places and Tree and Landscape fees. (CS & CD)
12
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
4. Fins r r -,t; �� F.E.M.A.
-ter
Complete.
5. rz inister eentract te eComplete an the updated OSCAR
Element of the General Plan and process GPA and
environmental document and update the Park Master Plan
by June 30, 2 0 0 3 . De`eeffib r 3120Gr— ( CD & CS)
6. Develop options to enhance open space and greenbelt
areas for consideration by the City Council. (CM & CD)
7. Process General Plan amendment and Zoning Code
amendment to create a Natural Open Space land use
designation and zone district as initiated by City
Council in 1995. (CD)
8. Prepare a Business Recovery Plan. (AS)
9. Develop affordable housing assistance programs in
conjunction with residential development projects in
the City and develop a five ye program for affordable
housing assistance projects utilizing redevelopment set
aside funds and other available funding sources to
increase the affordable housing stock in Moorpark.
(MRA)
10. Work with State of California to achieve appropriate
reuse of former Caltrans yard including widening of Los
Angeles Avenue. (CD & MRA)
11. Develop plan and conceptual design for City entry
signs. (CS & PW)
12. Initiate comprehensive update to General Plan Land Use
and Circulation Elements_ and insure internal_
consistency among all General Plan Elements. (CD)
13. Consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to allow
greater use of a variety of residential development
concepts to ensure optimum open space and recreation
amenities while achieving appropriate densities. (CD)
14. Establish design standards for commercial, industrial,
and residential development projects. (CD)
13
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
.50" 1211
15. Complete landscaping improvements on south side of Los
Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road. afire
nertee e f Tierra nej ,a Rea east and -= west- v
- Read. ( PW- : GS)
16. initiate a Labor m -ty -e =v ' -ent. (S r 1
ZcT
Complete.
17. Conduct study to determine feasibility of establishing
a trail system along the Arroyo Simi through the City
and east to connect to trail system in Simi Valley.
(PW & CD)
18 . Process _amendments to City Zone Ordinance includir
lighting, signage and second dwelling units. (CD)
19. Analyze feasibility and if feasible,_ prepare policy and
standards requiring installation_ of a photovoltaic
system for residential projects for consideration by
Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2003_
(CD)�
20. _Plan activities_ to celebrate_ City's 20`'' anniversary of
incorporation. (CS)
14
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
,VI.ila"I
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
Steven Kueny, City Manager kl�
ITEM 10.r .
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Consider City Co- Sponsorship of the Moorpark Rotary
Club's Civil War Reenactment
DISCUSSION:
The City is being asked to consider co- sponsorship of Rotary's
planned fundraising event. The event is a Civil War
reenactment. The primary purpose for the requested sponsorship
is to have the City assist in publicizing the event by allowing
use of the City marquee signs and the City quarterly newsletter.
The Rotary Club's purpose is to raise funds for use in the
Community, as do many other Moorpark based community service
organizations, which is a long- standing benefit to the
community. City participation is not necessary for them to
continue this outstanding and long - standing purpose.
Co- sponsorship by the City introduces potential liability. Staff
has researched special event insurance and found that coverage
specifically excludes pyrotechnics and firearms including
cannons. The City's insurance authority has recommended against
City co- sponsorship of this event. If this event is co-
sponsored, it would open the issue of sponsorship of events for
other non - profit groups for similar purposes.
The City Attorney has stated that allowing use of the City
marquee signs for a non -City sponsored event opens the forum for
others, so this appears to be a Catch 22 in that if City
sponsors the event it introduces potential liability, but if it
�> ;,
City Council Agenda Report
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 2
allows use of the marquee sign without sponsorship, it opens up
use of the signs to others.
Since it appears that the primary goal is to assist with
publicizing the event, while allowing similar treatment to other
local non - profit community service groups, it's recommended that
the City not co- sponsor the event but consider the following
options:
1. Use of one of the four pages in City Quarterly
Newsletter /Recreation Brochure as a community calendar on a
trial basis for the Fall brochure (expected publication
date is late August) for Moorpark based non - profit groups.
2. Consider allowing the Moorpark Rotary Club to place a
limited number of signs for their event in a manner similar
to boutique and garage /yard sale and temporary real estate -
open house signs as a trial pending a proposed modification
to the Sign Code that would permit such temporary signs.
3. Consider allowing Rotary to use marquee signs on a trial
basis for this event while staff evaluates the legal and
practical implications (administration, costs, etc.) of
such use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Decline Co- Sponsorship.
2. Authorize staff to implement Options 1 and 2 in agenda
report.
{
iTEm—ileAs
CITY OF MOORPARg
of
WARRANT REGISTER ACT 1, - FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR ---a ---
BY-
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 05, 2002
SEQUENCE AMOUNT
From To
MANUAL, 109387 - 109391 $ 10,163.33
WARRANTS
VOIDED 109365 & 109570 & $ (8,816.60)
WARRANTS 109571
$ 1,346.73
PAYROLL LIABILITY
WARRANTS
REGULAR
WARRANTS
TOTAL
109392 - 109399 $ 11,851.75
109400 - 109511 &
109512 - 109560 &
109561 - 109617
$ 28,134.08
$ 10,223.90
$ 995,562.23
a 19U'1/,110.V7
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 0100 -
INTERNAL SERVICES
FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
010057100000
9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
JOHNSTON -MISAC BREAK 20
3/18- 5/2/02 05/09/02
109389
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE
¢ac�1
L�
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 05/09/02 8.19
0.00 0.00 8.19
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:11 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
8.19
8.19
8.19
8.19
05/30/02
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
44.53
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
44.53
FUND - 1000
- GENERAL FUND-
UNRESTRICTED
0.00
0.00
24.00
0.00
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
05/09/02
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
100011000000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
05/09/02
1101
0.00
M050902
CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIE
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109369
100011000000
9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
126.38
05/09/02
1101
126.38
M050902
MIKOS- CHANNEL COUNTI
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100011000000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
05/09/02
1101
M050902
CITY COUNCIL DINNER
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100011000000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
05/09/02
1101
0.00
M050902
CITY COUNCIL DINNER
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100011000000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
10.00
05/09/02
1101
10.00
M050902
CITY COUNCIL DINNER
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100011000000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
05/09/02
1101
M050902
CITY COUNCIL DINNER
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL NET PAYABLE
100021000000
9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
CHUDOBA- CHANNEL COUN
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100021000000
9225
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
H RILEY -SR 118 WEIGH
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE
100031100000
9241
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
20
3/18- 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100031100000
9224
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
11.01
M050902
FRETZ -JPIA SEMINAR M
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
DMV REIMBURSEMENT
20
3/18- 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
100031100000
9222
SCPMA
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
D TRAFFENSTEDT & J F
20
MEMBERSHIP
05/09/02
109387
�A
�i
` RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:12
PAGE 2
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
05/09/02
44.53
0.00
0.00
44.53
0.00
05/09/02
24.00
0.00
0.00
24.00
0.00
05/09/02
17.84
0.00
0.00
17.84
0.00
05/09/02
5.90
0.00
0.00
5.90
0.00
05/09/02
20.27
0.00
0.00
20.27
0.00
05/09/02
13.84
0.00
0.00
13.84
126.38
126.38
126.38
126.38
0.00
05/09/02
24.00
0.00
0.00
24.00
0.00
05/09/02
5.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
0.00
05/09/02
32.92
0.00
0.00
32.92
0.00
05/09/02
15.33
0.00
0.00
15.33
0.00
05/09/02
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
58.25
58.25
0.00
05/09/02
60.00
0.00
0.00
60.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000
- GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
100031100000
9222
SCPMA
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
550.00
M050902
DEVELOPING COMPETENC
20
REGISTRATION
05/09/02
109388
0.00
0.00
550.00
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT
668.25
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET
PAYABLE
668.25
100075200000
9204
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
15.00
M050902
VECTOR DRY ICE
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
15.00
TOTAL VECTOR
CONTROL CHECK AMT
15.00
TOTAL VECTOR
CONTROL NET PAYABLE.
15.00
100076100000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
22.88
M050902
SR CTR PHOTO DEVELOP
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
22.88
100076100000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
30.00
M050902
ROTHSCHILD -SR LUNCHE
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
30.00
100076100000
9231
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
35.52
M050902
SR CTR NEWSLETTER PO
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
35.52
100076100000
9231
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
41.35
M050902
SR CTR NEWSLETTER PO
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
41.35
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
129.75
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
129.75
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER CHECK
AMT
129.75
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER NET PAYABLE
129.75
100076107619
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
9.85
M050902
SR CTR FRIDAY MOVIE
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
9.85
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER TRUST
EXP CHECK AMT
9.85
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER TRUST
EXP NET PAYABLE
9.85
100076301007
9243
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
42.90
M050902
CLUB 45 -50 EVENT SUP
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
1.09389
0.00
0.00
42.90
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800)
CHECK AMT
42.90
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800)
NET PAYABLE
42.90
100076307603
9244
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
50.00
M050902
SKATEPARK CONTEST
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
50.00
100076307603
9244
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1.101
0.00
05/09/02
40.69
M050902 LOOSBROCK- SKATEPARK 20 3/18- 5/2/02 05/09/02 109389 0.00 0.00 40.69
�.N
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
rrC)
�4
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE
100076307609 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M050902 SHAW - SPRING CAMP 20 3/18- 5/2/02
100076307609 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M050902 SHAW SPRING CAMP 20 3/18 - 5/2/02
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL SPRING CAMP CHECK AMT
TOTAL SPRING CAMP NET PAYABLE
100092000000 9225 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M050902 JENKINSON -CFCIA LUNC 20 3/18 - 5/2/02
100092000000 9225 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M050902 LARSEN -CFCIA LUNCHEO 20 3/18- 5/2/02
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES CHECK AMT
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
6. J
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13
Cd J
05/09/02
12.01
0.00
05/09/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
05/09/02
1101
0.00
05/09/02
05/09/02
109389
0.00
0.00
PAGE 4
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
90.69
90.69
90.69
90.69
47.47
47.47
50.00
50.00
97.47
97.47
97.47
97.47
15.00
15.00
3.5.00
15.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
1239.29
1239.29
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2000 -
TRAFFIC SAFETY
FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
200083300000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
110].
0.00
M050902
HUTCHINSON - HEADPHONE
20
3/18 - 5/2/02 05/09/02
109389
0.00
TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE
TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE
a0
�c y
e�
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13
PAGE 5
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
05/09/02 6.96
0.00 6.96
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
6.96
6.96
6.96
6.96
05/30/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11/01
FUND - 2200 -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
220064300000
9222
CITY OF MOORPARK
M050902
ICGA -CEO LUNCHEON
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
4 :ri
0
C�
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
N 05/09/02 1101
20 3/18 - 5/2/02 05/09/02 109389
PAGE 6
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 05/09/02 12.00
0.00 0.00 12.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2300
- AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
2300
2102
E & M CONSTRUCTORS C
M
05/09/02
1101
0.00
M050902
01 PRKWY & MED RETEN
20
RETENTION 05/09/02
109391
0.00
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
S w�
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13
PAGE 7
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
05/09/02 100.10
0.00 100.10
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
100.10
100.].0
100.10
100.10
05/30/02
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11 /01
0.00
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
0.00
FUND - 2302 -
AD 84 -2 ZONE 2
0.00
0.00
2218.98
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
2302
2102
E & M CONSTRUCTORS C
M
05/09/02
1101
M050902
01 PRKWY & MED RETEN
20
RETENTION
05/09/02
109391
2302
2102
E & M CONSTRUCTORS C
M
05/09/02
1101
M050902
01 PRKWY & MED RETEN
20
RETENTION
05/09/02
109390
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2
ZONE 2 CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2
ZONE 2 NET
PAYABLE
230283108019
9640
E & M CONSTRUCTORS C
M
05/09/02
1101
M050902
2001 PARKWAY & MEDIA
20
RETENTION
05/09/02
109391
TOTAL TIERRA REJADA LANDSCAPE CHECK AMT
TOTAL TIERRA REJADA LANDSCAPE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE
t {r
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:13
PAGE 8
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
05/09/02
2264.02
0.00
0.00
2264.02
0.00
05/09/02
2218.98
0.00
0.00
2218.98
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
0.00 05/09/02 250.00
0.00 0.00 250.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
250.00
250.00
4733.00
4733.00
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
2501 2102 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 05/09/02 1101
M050902 01 PRKWY & MED RETEN 20 RETENTION 05/09/02 109390
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
250183108025 9640 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 05/09/02 1101
M050902 TIERRA REJADA PARKWA 20 RETENTION 05/09/02 109391
TOTAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CIiECK AMT
TOTAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
(ft'll
0
r�
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01 :13
PAGE 9
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 05/09/02 3733.50
0.00 0.00 3733.50
3733.50
3733.50
0.00 05/09/02 250.00
0.00 0.00 250.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
250.00
250.00
3983.50
3983.50
05/30/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
260583100000 9232
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
CIP PROJECT -COMB BIN
20
3/18- 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
260583100000 9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
GILBERT APWA LUNCHEO
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109369
260583100000 9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
MORGENSTERN -MSA LUNC
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
CHECK AMT
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT
TOTAL GAS TAX NET.PAYABLE
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01:14
SALES TAX DISC DATE
USE TAX DISC AMT
0.00 05/09/02
0.00 0.00
0.00 05/09/02
0.00 0.00
0.00 05/09/02
0.00 0.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE 10
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
4.18
4.18
20.00
20.00
15.00
15.00
39.18
39.18
39.18
39.18
39.18
39.18
05/30/02
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
NET PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01
05/09/02
3.22
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
0.00
FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD
INC HOUSE /INC
05/09/02
10.00
0.00
0.00
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
290124200000 9206
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
BURNS -6479 PENN KEYS
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
290124200000 9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
BURNS -APA MTG
20
3/18- 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
290124200000 9202
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
HERNANDEZ- OFFICE SUP
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
290124200000 9224
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
05/09/02
1101
M050902
BURNS -APA MTG
20
3/18 - 5/2/02
05/09/02
109389
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:01 :14
PAGE 11
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
05/09/02
3.22
0.00
0.00
3.22
0.00
05/09/02
10.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
05/09/02
9.64
0.00
0.00
9.64
0.00
05/09/02
18.25
0.00
0.00
18.25
41.11
41.11
41.11
41.11
41.11
41.11
10163.33
10163.33
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
100075200000 9222 MVCAC- SOUTHERN REGIO
N
05/01/02
1101
AP011602 2/27 SEMINAR II CYCL
20
L TRAN 01/16/02
108244 V
100075200000 9222 MVCAC- SOUTHERN REGIO
N
05/01/02
1101
AP011602 2/27 SEMINAR II CYCL
20
M WESTERLINE 01/16/02
108244 V
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT
TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
J
i y RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 08:33:18
kr
SALES TAX DISC DATE
USE TAX DISC AMT
0.00 01/07/02
0.00 0.00
0.00 01/07/02
0.00 0.00
PAGF. 1
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
-15.00
-15.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
-15.00
-15.00
-30.00
-30.00
-30.00
-30.00
-30.00
-30.00
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
2300 2102 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 05/15/02 1101
AP051502 01 PRKWY & MED RETEN 20 RETENTION 05/15/02 109365 V
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 08:33:16
W�
PAGE 2
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 04/30/02 - 100.10
0.00 0.00 - 100.10
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
- 100.10
- 100.10
- 100.10
- 100.10
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2302 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 2
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
2302 2102 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 05/15/02 1101
AP051502 01 PRKWY & MED RETEN 20 RETENTION 05/15/02 109365 V
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE
230283108019 9640 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 2003.0144 -03 05/15/02 1101
AP051502 TIERRA REJADA PARKWA 20 PAYMENT #3 05/15/02 109365 V
TOTAL TIERRA REJADA LANDSCAPE CHECK AMT
TOTAL TIERRA REJADA LANDSCAPE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 08:33:18
PAGE 3
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 04/30/02 - 4483.00
0.00 0.00 - 4483.00
- 4483.00
-- 4483.00
0.00 04/30/02 - 250.00
0.00 0.00 - 250.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
- 250.00
- 250.00
- 4733.00
- 4733.00
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
2501 2102 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 05/15/02 1101
AP051502 01 PRKWY & MED RETEN 20 RETENTION 05/15/02 109365 V
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TO'T'AL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
250183108025 9640 E & M CONSTRUCTORS C M 20010144 -01 05/15/02 1101
A2051502 2001 PARKWAY & MEDIA 20 PAYMENT #3 05/15/02 109365 V
TOTAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CHECK AMT
TOTAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAT. LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 08:33:18
"C
PAGE 4
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 04/30/02 - 3733.50
0.00 0.00 - 3733.50
- 3733.50
- 3733.50
0.00 04/30/02 - 250.00
0.00 0.00 - 250.00
PENTAM71,TION - FUND ACCOUNTING
- 250.00
- 250.00
- 3983.50
- 3983.50
- 8846.60
- 8846.60
05/22/02
AMOUNT
CANCER INSURANCE
124.32
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11/01
3,576.83
CHECK REGISTER
350.75
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
118.00
ID 49600616061
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109392
1101
05/24/02
2335
AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN
2299
109393
1101
05/24/02
1886
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457
2210
109393
1101
05/24/02
1886
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457
2210
TOTAL CHECK
109394
1101
05/24/02
1888
S E I U LOCAL 998
2208
109395
1101
05/24/02
1891
SANDRA KUENY
2299
109396
1101
05/24/02
1889
UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU
2207
109397
1101
05/24/02
1890
VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A
2299
109398
1101
05/24/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
109398
1101
05/24/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
TOTAL CHECK
109399
1101
05/24/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL REPORT
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 10:15:50
PAGE 1
DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
CANCER INSURANCE
124.32
F/T REG DEFER COMP
2,678.85
F/T REG DEFER COMP
897.98
3,576.83
UNION DUES
350.75
CASE #SD020444
2,172.50
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
118.00
ID 49600616061
168.46
F/T REG DEFER COMP
3,492.61
F/T REG DEFER COMP
1,521.92
5,014.53
P/T REG DEFER COMP
326.36
11,851.75
11,851.75
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND FUND TITLE
1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
TOTAL REPORT
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 10:15 :52
muslium
11,851.75
11,851.75
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
42.24
VILLA CAMPESINA FOUNTAIN
20.46
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
75.08
CHECK REGISTER
3.86
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
5.29
5 /02RECREATION PAGER
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109400
1101
05/22/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9420
109401
1101
05/22/02
1006
A -1 LOCK AND SAFE
9208
109402
1101
05/22/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
109403
1101
05/22/02
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9208
109403
1101
05/22/02
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
30.66
TOTAL CHECK
70.73
FREIGHT - PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
28.72
109404
1101
05/22/02
1012
ACCURATE WELDING
9205
109405
1101
05/22/02
2040
AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATI
9620
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCM WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109406
1101
05/22/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
TOTAL CHECK
109407
1101
05/22/02
1037
ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER
9204
109407
1101
05/22/02
1037
ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER
9205
TOTAL CHECK
109408
1101
05/22/02
2860
B.T.R. INC.
9244
109408
1101
05/22/02
2860
B.T.R. INC.
9243
TOTAL CHECK
109409
1101
05/22/02
3143
BARRIGA, FRANCISCO
2606
109410
1101
05/22/02
1050
BAUDVILLE
9205
109411
1101
05/22/02
1054
BELLASALMA, TONY
9103
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9243
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9205
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9243
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9243
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
109412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9205
(°rD9412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9205
( 9412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
`169412
1101
05/22/02
3057
BEST IMPRESSIONS
9244
�.
TOTAL
CHECK
y RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21
C�
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
4 /02AVRC CELLPHONE 16.36
IS MGR KEYS 12.87
SZABO- WEEK END 4/26- 32IIRS 720.00
ALL PARKS TOOLS
42.24
VILLA CAMPESINA FOUNTAIN
20.46
62.70
ARROYO VISTA PUMP REPAIR
25.00
AVCP RR PROJ RENTALS
75.08
5/02 EMERGENCY SRVC PAGER
3.86
5/02 CITY MGR PAGER
30.23
5/02 PRKNG ENF PAGER
5.29
5 /02RECREATION PAGER
4.33
5/02 FACILITIES PAGER
5.29
5/02 CITY COUNCIL PAGER
55.48
5/02 CITY CLERK PAGER
5.76
5/02 IS MGR PAGER
6.55
5/02 COMMUNITY SRVC PAGER
5.76
5/02 MRA PAGER
4.33
5/02 PARKS PAGER
8.66
5/02 PUBLIC WORKS PAGER
15.38
150.92
4/02 VECTOR WATER
12.96
4/02 CH BREAKROOM SUPPLIE
169.13
182.09
5 /3AFTER DARK PIZZA EVENT
240.00
5 /11BATTLE OF BANDS PIZZA
180.00
420.00
REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT
75.00
CERTIFICATE /PROCLAMATION
198.61
4 /02MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
30.66
SHAPED KEY TAGS
70.73
FREIGHT - PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
28.72
FREIGHT - PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
47.31
BEACH BALLS
150.37
BEACH BALLS
121.94
SUPER FLYER (9 1/411)
116.51
BEACH BALLS
57.76
SUPER FLYER (9 1/411)
55.19
SUPER FLYER (9 1/4 ")
143.67
SHAPED KEY TAGS
87.22
SHAPED KEY TAGS
33.50
FREIGHT - PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
49.51
962.43
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
38.70
RDA INSTITUTE5/6- BLODGING
353.20
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
129.00
CHECK REGISTER
20.00
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
400.00
GRIFFIN PRK SPRINKLER SUP
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- -
- - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109413
1101
05/22/02
1075
BRAND, JOHN
9222
109414
1101
05/22/02
2414
BRANDCO BILLING
9254
109415
1101
05/22/02
1078
BSN SPORTS
9244
109416
1101
05/22/02
1084
BURNS, NANCY
9224
109416
1101
05/22/02
1.084
BURNS, NANCY
9225
73.68
TOTAL CHECK
51.44
COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES
115.87
109417
1101
05/22/02
1788
CANTWELL, ALICE A
9160
109418
1101
05/22/02
2737
CAREER TRACK
9222
109419
1101
05/22/02
3136
CENTENO, ART
9244
109420
1101
05/22/02
2554
CHANEY WELDING
9208
109421
1101
05/22/02
1123
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9601
109422
1101
05/22/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9205
109422
1101
05/22/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9205
109422
1101
05/22/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9205
109422
1101
05/22/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9205
TOTAL CHECK
109423
1101
05/22/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
109424
1101
05/22/02
3151
CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COM
9252
109425
1101
05/22/02
3060
COVARRUBIAS, MARIO
3404
109425
1101
05/22/02
3060
COVARRUBIAS, MARIO
2614
TOTAL CHECK
109426
1101
05/22/02
3135
CURRAN, MARK W.
9103
109427
1101
05/22/02
2631
DALEY, MICHAEL
9244
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAI, INC
9203
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE. CENTRAL INC
9201
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
109428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
1.09428
1101
05/22/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
TOTAL CHECK
09429
1101
05/22/02
2320
DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATION
9102
409430
1101
05/22/02
2956
DISCOUNT AUDIO, INC.
9205
i109430
1101
05/22/02
2956
DISCOUNT AUDIO, INC.
9205
p
TOTAL CHECK
E' RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21
PAGE 2
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
LOC TRAN -NACA AIRFARE 160.50
CEO TRUCK OIL CHANGE 23.47
SPORTS EQUIP -CAMP MPK 220.17
RDA INSTITUTES /6- SMILEAGE
38.70
RDA INSTITUTE5/6- BLODGING
353.20
391.90
PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR PYMT
1,644.00
5/2 M RILEY SELF - DISCIPLI
129.00
ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
SKATE RAMP REPAIR MAINTEN
160.00
LA AVE,SPRING -MPK PRELIMI
400.00
GRIFFIN PRK SPRINKLER SUP
334.41
AV PRK BLFLD #2 SPRINKLER
161.72
AV PRK PLUMBING SUPPLIES
174.38
AV PARK REPAIR WATER LINE
112.61
783.12
MPK PD MEMORY MODULE
49.34
CITY HALL MATS REPLACED
119.29
REFUND RENT PRORATION
129.97
REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT
364.40
494.37
5/29SR CTR B -DAY ENTERTAI
75.00
ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
40.00
CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIE
46.43
CITY CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIE
52.71
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
3.82
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
15.99
CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES
144.73
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPP
7.45
CITY HALL TONER SUPPLIES
73.68
SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES
51.44
COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES
115.87
COMM SRVC OFFICE SIIPPLIES
59.63
COMM SRVCS OFFICE SUPPLIE
119.15
690.90
5/02 MONTHLY SRVC CONTRAC
284.00
MIC /SPEAKER STAND FOR AN-
114.41
FREIGHT (MIC /SPEAKER STAN
5.35
119.76
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT
109431
1101
05/22/02
2786
DISCOUNT HELIUM OF DALLAS
9205
109431
1101
05/22/02
2786
DISCOUNT HELIUM OF DALLAS
9205
I-IARTNETT,HOGAN NAMEPLATES
TOTAL
CHECK
27.08
81.24
109432
1101
05/22/02
1690
DOYLE SHAW ICE
9204
109433
1101
05/22/02
3137
DUAH, JOHN K.
9244
109434
1101
05/22/02
1196
DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORATION
9301
109435
1101
05/22/02
1212
ENGRAVING WIZARD
9205
109435
1101
05/22/02
1212
ENGRAVING WIZARD
9205
9252
TOTAL
CHECK
1101
05/22/02
1283
109436
1101
05/22/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9231
109436
1101
05/22/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9231
TOTAL
CHECK
263.84
REFUND -YOUTH OFFICIATING
20.00
109437
1101
05/22/02
2862
G.I. RUBBISH
9252
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
109438
1101
05/22/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
109439
1101
05/22/02
3145
GELLENBECK, DONALD A.
9244
109440
1101
05/22/02
3147
GREEN MEADOW NURSERY
9331
109441
1101
05/22/02
2823
HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT
9610
109442
1101
05/22/02
2758
HARTMAN, JEFF
9244
109443
1101
05/22/02
1272
HERTZ, EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9244
109443
1101
05/22/02
1272
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9244
109443
1101
05/22/02
1272
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9252
109443
1101
05/22/02
1272
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9252
109443
1101
05/22/02
1272
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9252
TOTAL
CHECK
109444
1101
05/22/02
2123
HIGH TECH SIGNS & BANNERS
9205
109444
1101
05/22/02
2123
HIGH TECH SIGNS & BANNERS
9244
109444
23.41
1101
05/22/02
2123
HIGH TECH SIGNS & BANNERS
9243
11.00
WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE
TOTAL CHECK
GRAFFTTI REMOVAL PAINT
78.29
I-IARTNETT,HOGAN NAMEPLATES
54.16
HOGAN NAMEPLATES ENGRAVIN
27.08
81.24
4 /3CHUDOBA -BW &S
9.54
BURNS - DEPTS OF HOUSING
109445,L
ec
1101
05/22/02
1274
HILTI INC
9208
109446
f
1101
05/22/02
3148
HODGSON, KATHLEEN
3862
26.21
1 JACKET -AVRC STAFF
62.03
414.02
5 /6BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
109447
117.98
1101
05/22/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9252
109447
5 /3AFTER DARK LIGHT TOWER
1101
05/22/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9310
109447
-53.63
1101
05/22/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9208
296.05
RUN DATE 05/22/02
TIME 16 :00:21
896.31
GRAFFITI REMOVER GEL
PACE 3
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
FREIGHT - BALLOONS & ACCESS
23.41
BALLOONS,RIBBON & RACK
156.06
179.47
VECTOR DRY ICE
11.00
WOMEN'S SOCCER LEAGUE
380.00
GRAFFTTI REMOVAL PAINT
78.29
I-IARTNETT,HOGAN NAMEPLATES
54.16
HOGAN NAMEPLATES ENGRAVIN
27.08
81.24
4 /3CHUDOBA -BW &S
9.54
BURNS - DEPTS OF HOUSING
24.05
33.59
5 /02MOBILF.HOME PRK TRASH
407.82
5 JACKETS -PARK STAFF
288.27
CITY SEAL ON JACKET
5.65
FREIGHT -AVRC JACKET
5.65
CITY SEAL TO JACKET
26.21
FREIGHT -PARK STAFF JACKET
26.21
1 JACKET -AVRC STAFF
62.03
414.02
5 /6BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
24" MOORPARK APRICOT TREE
117.98
NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE BR
150.00
ADULT BASKETBALL ASSIGNER
97.50
5 /3AFTER DARK LIGHT TOWER
130.31
5 /3AFTER DARK LIGHT TOWER
115.30
ZONE 12 DOZER RENTAL
464.85
CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
-5.60
CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
-53.63
651.23
RECREATION MISC SIGNS
346.40
CAMP MPK SIGNS
296.05
FIREWORKS EVENT SIGNS
253.86
896.31
GRAFFITI REMOVER GEL
263.84
REFUND -YOUTH OFFICIATING
20.00
18 HIGH ST CEILING REPAIR
19.24
CONCRETE FORMS
131.26
PW TRASH BAGS
38.19
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
83.85
272.54
CITY HALL CLEANING SUPPLI
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11 /01
192.25
CHECK REGISTER
83.00
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
418.97
02/03 HR MEMBERSHIP DUES
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109447
5 /11TEEN EVENT RENTAL
1101
05/22/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9252
5 /02PW BLDG JANITORIAL
180.00
TOTAL CHECK
769.00
CONCRETE REPAIRS @ YARD
78.83
109448
300.00
1101
05/22/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
109448
5 /02CII WATER & EQUIP RENT
1101
05/22/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
109448
10.00
1101
05/22/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
109448
TR PRK MONUMENT SIGN
1101
05/22/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
109448
142.56
1101
05/22/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
200.71
4 /02CROSS GUARD CAR WASHE
TOTAL CHECK
4 /02PARKS CAR WASHES
7.00
4 /02VF.CTOR CAR WASHES
109449
PENTAMATION - FUND
1101
05/22/02
2088
I.P.M.A.
9221
109450
1101
05/22/02
1923
ICMA PRODUCT FULFILLMENT
9222
109451
1101
05/22/02
1447
IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL,
9211
109452
1101
05/22/02
1309
JOBS AVAILABLE, INC
9236
109453
1101
05/22/02
1312
JOLLY JUMPS INC
9243
109454
1101
05/22/02
3059
JORDAN, IAN
3404
109455
1101
05/22/02
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
109455
1101
05/22/02
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
TOTAL CHECK
109456
1101
05/22/02
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
109457
1101
05/22/02
3133
L.R. PAULSF.LL CONSULTING
9103
109458
1101
05/22/02
1329
LANDIS, KIPP A
9225
109459
1101
05/22/02
2949
LIBERTY FLAG & SPECIALTY
9205
109460
1101
05/22/02
3132
LUNERS PRO SOUND
9243
109461
1101
05/22/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I
9205
109461
1101
05/22/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I
9205
109461
1101
05/22/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I
9205
109461
1101
05/22/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I
9205
TOTAL CHECK
109462
1101
05/22/02
1366
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY
9252
109462
1101
05/22/02
1366
MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY
9252
109462
1101
05/22/02
1366
MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY
9252
109462
1101
05/22/02
1366
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY
9204
109462
1101
05/22/02
1366
MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY
9204
TOTAL CHECK
109463
qq�
"'
1101
05/22/02
3072
MEDTOX DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
9205
109463
S
1101
05/22/02
3072
MEDTOX DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
9205
TOTAL CHECK
109464
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUSE
9254
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21
PAGE 4
- - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
WATER FOUNTAIN DEFOAMER
83.85
272.54
CITY HALL CLEANING SUPPLI
59.85
AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIES
19.84
AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIES
192.25
AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIES
83.00
COM FACILITIES SOAP
64.03
418.97
02/03 HR MEMBERSHIP DUES
199.00
ANIMAL CONTROL MGT BOOK
28.10
6 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL
64.35
3 /25,4 /8DEPUTY CITY CLERK
107.64
5 /11TEEN EVENT RENTAL
45.00
REFUND -RENT PRORATION
23.70
5 /02SR CTR JANITORIAL
589.00
5 /02PW BLDG JANITORIAL
180.00
769.00
CONCRETE REPAIRS @ YARD
78.83
CCTV PIPELINE INSPECTION
300.00
PLANNERS INSTITUTE PRKNG
44.54
AVRC SPECIAL SUPPLIES
42.50
POWER AMPLIFIER FOR TEEN
91.16
5 /02CII WATER & EQUIP RENT
154.50
5 /02AVRC WATER & EQUIP
23.90
4 /02ANNEX WATER & EQUIP
51.70
5 /02PW BLDG WATER EQUIP
10.00
240.10
TR PRK SIGN LETTER
16.51
MTN MEADOWS PRK SIGN LETT
16.51
TR PRK MONUMENT SIGN
43.02
BLUEPRINT ID TAGS
33.26
BLUEPRINT ID TAGS
33.26
142.56
TEST KITS FOR THC /COCAINE
195.69
SHIPPING -FOUR PANEL TEST
5.02
200.71
4 /02CROSS GUARD CAR WASHE
3.50
4 /02PARKS CAR WASHES
7.00
4 /02VF.CTOR CAR WASHES
7.00
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
AMOUNT
4 /02CEO CAR WASHES
7.00
4 /02PW ADMIN CAR WASHES
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
4 /02PW CAR WASHES
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000
-
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
20.77
4 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL
CHECK NUMBER
4 /02PRKS FUEL
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109464
3.50
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
75.00
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
109464
250.00
1101
05/22/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
42.00
CAMPUS PRK RR SEATS
TOTAL CHECK
PEACH HILL PRK RR SEATS
9.96
AVCP RR SEATS
109465
POINDEXTER PRK RR SEATS
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
109465
9.95
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
109465
5 /02METROLINK SWEEPING
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
109465
8.00
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9102
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
109465
1101
05/22/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
TOTAL CHECK
109466
1101
05/22/02
1750
MOBILE MINI, INC.
9103
109467
1101
05/22/02
2918
MONSTERTRAK.COM
9236
109467
1101
05/22/02
2918
MONSTERTRAK.COM
9236
TOTAL CHECK
109468
1101
05/22/02
1387
MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY
9204
109468
1101
05/22/02
1387
MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY
9204
TOTAL CHECK
109469
1101
05/22/02
2700
NACA - NATIONAL ANIMAL CONT
9222
109469
1101
05/22/02
2700
NACA - NATIONAL ANIMAL CONT
9222
TOTAL CHECK
109470
1101
05/22/02
2075
NEW HORIZONS
9222
109471
1101
05/22/02
2724
OAKBROOK ENGRAVING & AWAR
9205
109472
1101
05/22/02
3138
OLINYK, WANDA
3865
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECTALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
�`j
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
109473
1101
05/22/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9252
TOTAL CHECK
109474
a„
1101
05/22/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9352
109474
�.�
k
1101 05/22/02
TOTAL CHECK
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9350
109475
1101
05/22/02
1434
PARK LANE CAR WASH INC
9254
109475
1101
05/22/02
1434
PARK LANE CAR WASH INC
9255
RUN DATE 05/22/02
TIME 16 :00:21
PAGE 5
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
4 /02CEO CAR WASHES
7.00
4 /02PW ADMIN CAR WASHES
36.00
4 /02MPK PD CAR WASHES
274.00
4 /02PRKNG ENF CAR WASFES
3.50
4 /02PW CAR WASHES
36.00
374.00
4 /02PW STREETS FUEL
28.93
4 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL
20.77
4 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL
20.77
4 /02PRKS FUEL
138.00
4 /02PRKS CAR WASH,OIL CHA
59.90
4 /02CITY BUS FUEL
40.00
4 /02PW ADMIN FUEL
3.50
4 /02MPK PD FUEL
95.15
4 /02PW STREETS CAR WASHES
3.50
4 /02PW ADMIN FUEL
12.38
422.90
5 /02STORAGE UNIT RENTAL
137.28
4 /19SUMMER REC POSITIONS
50.00
4 /19SUMMER REC POSITIONS
75.00
125.00
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.10
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.10
18.20
BITE STICK CERTIFICATION
75.00
6 /13- 15NACA 02 CONFERENCE
175.00
250.00
EXCEL - FIGUEROA & HINOJOSA
145.00
SANTA PAULA CITY PLAQUE
19.52
REFUND -TEEN BASKETBALL
42.00
CAMPUS PRK RR SEATS
9.96
PEACH HILL PRK RR SEATS
9.96
AVCP RR SEATS
9.96
POINDEXTER PRK RR SEATS
9.96
MTN MEADOWS PRK RR SEATS
9.96
TR PRK RR SEATS
9.96
MILLER PRK RR SEATS
9.95
CAMPUS CYN RR SEATS
9.96
GRIFFIN PRK RR SEATS
9.96
89.63
5 /02METROLINK SWEEPING
535.23
5 /02STATE ROUTE SWEEPING
284.31
819.54
TRUCK #28 CAR WASH
8.00
TRUCK #28 FUEL
23.40
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
20.00
5 /6BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
90.09
CHECK REGISTER
8.49
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
101.89
01 MPK PD ANNUAL REPORT
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
TOTAL CHECK
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.92
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
109476
1101
05/22/02
2073
PEACOCK, STEVE P
9102
109477
1101
05/22/02
3139
PEEL, HEIDI
9244
109477
1101
05/22/02
3139
PEEL, HEIDI
9244
16.69
TOTAL CHECK
18.11
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
109478
1101
05/22/02
2970
PEOPLEWISE, LLC
9236
109479
1101
05/22/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9202
109479
1101
05/22/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9231
109479
1101
05/22/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9241
109479
1101
05/22/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9103
109479
1101
05/22/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
TOTAL CHECK
109480
1101
05/22/02
3152
PRICE, RONALD
3865
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109481
1101
05/22/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
TOTAL CHECK
1.09482
1101
05/22/02
1476
RADIO SHACK
9251
109483
1101
05/22/02
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9243
109484
('')1101
05/22/02
1503
SEER CORPORATION
9205
109485
01101
05/22/02
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
109486
1101
05/22/02
3153
SILVERMAN, ALISON
3862
109486
1101 05/22/02
9
3153
SILVERMAN, ALISON
3862
TOTAL
CHECK
109487
1101
05/22/02
1515
SIMI PACIFIC BLDG. MATERI
9205
109488
1101
05/22/02
1517
SIMI VALLEY BASE, INC
931C
RUN DATE
05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21
PAGE 6
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
31.40
3 PRKNG CITATION HEARINGS 45.00
ADULT BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
5 /6BASKETBALL OFFICIAL
20.00
40.00
3 /02SUNDBERG BACKGROUND C
247.00
COMM DEV DATE STAMPS
90.09
MPK PD SHIPMENT TO NACP
8.49
HR TO BUDDYS ALL STARS
24.90
ROTHSCHILD BUSINESS CARDS
101.89
01 MPK PD ANNUAL REPORT
506.76
732.13
REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE
52.00
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.92
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
15.93
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.93
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.92
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.93
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.92
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.93
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
15.93
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
15.93
PW-UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
25.96
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
18.11
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
25.97
COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL
64.52
COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL
64.52
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
27.69
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
25.97
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
480.47
SR CTR VCR REPAIR DEPOSIT
10.00
TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES
50.82
FULL COVERAGE VEHICULAR H
320.62
4 /02TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR
76.88
REFUND - GYMNASTICS CLASS
219.95
ADMIN FEES
-10.00
209.95
AV MEMORIAL TREE STAKES
11.26
BASE UNDER CONCRETE RAMPS
21.66
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
80.76
102.42
TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11 /01
189.96
CHECK REGISTER
581.81
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
3 /02DATA LINE SERVICE
35.04
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109488
4 /02AVRC GAS
1101
05/22/02
1517
SIMI VALLEY BASE, INC
9310
380.30
TOTAL CHECK
70.63
02 CPRS CONF MILEAGE
75.48
109489
146.11
1101
05/22/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9243
109489
ARBORIAL SEMINAR PRKNG
1101
05/22/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9244
109489
143.89
1101
05/22/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9243
229.40
TOTAL CHECK
LAND USE MAP
8.04
WESTERLINE- NECROPSY EXAM
109490
3 /02ADMIN RECORD STORAGE
1101
05/22/02
1548
STATE OF CA DEPT OF HEALT
9222
109491
65.28
1101
05/22/02
1438
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC
9102
109491
1101
05/22/02
1438
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC
9102
TOTAL CHECK
109492
1101
05/22/02
1566
TELCOM INC
9208
109493
1101
05/22/02
1571
THE GAS COMPANY
9416
109493
1101
05/22/02
1571
THE GAS COMPANY
9416
109493
1101
05/22/02
1571
THE GAS COMPANY
9416
TOTAL CHECK
109494
1101
05/22/02
1574
THOMPSON, SANDRA G
9225
109494
1101
05/22/02
1574
THOMPSON, SANDRA G
9224
TOTAL CHECK
109495
1101
05/22/02
1575
THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY
9102
109496
1101
05/22/02
1581
TOMARK SPORTS
9205
109497
1101
05/22/02
2827
TRAN, LOC H
9224
109497
1101
05/22/02
2827
TRAM, LOC H
9225
TOTAL CHECK
109498
1101
05/22/02
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9240
109499
1101
05/22/02
2636
TUMBLESON, DEPUTY ED
9205
109500
1101
05/22/02
1593
U.S. POSTMASTER
9231
109500
1101
05/22/02
1593
U.S. POSTMASTER
9231
109500
1101
05/22/02
1593
U.S. POSTMASTER
9231
TOTAL CHECK
109501
1101
05/22/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9232
109502
1101
05/22/02
1678
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
9204
109503
//
1101
05/22/02
1152
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
9102
109503
h,
1101
05/22/02
1152
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
9102
109503
C"1101
05/22/02
1152
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
9102
8
"
TOTAL CHECK
109504
1101
05/22/02
1160
VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR
9212
109505
1101
05/22/02
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9252
109505
1101
05/22/02
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9252
TOTAL CHECK
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21
PAGE 7
- - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
BASE UNDER CONCRETE RAMPS
80.76
102.42
TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES
370.45
TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES
21.40
TEEN PROGRAMS SUPPLIES
189.96
581.81
TRAN,WESTERLINE EDUCATION
64.00
3 /02DATA LINE SERVICE
35.04
5 /02- 4 /03MAINT&SUPPORT
955.60
990.64
REPLACE PARKS RADIO
600.60
4 /02AVRC GAS
72.05
4 /02COMM FACILITIES GAS
94.65
4 /02MOBILEHOME PRK GAS
213.60
380.30
02 CPRS CONF MEALS &PRKG
70.63
02 CPRS CONF MILEAGE
75.48
146.11
4 /02TAXI SRVC -13 TRIPS
116.30
MILLER PRK TENNIS NET
151.13
MOSQUITO SEMINAR MILEAGE
50.05
ARBORIAL SEMINAR PRKNG
1.6.00
66.05
MPK PD BUSINESS CARD MAGN
330.85
REIMBURSE- BICYCLE DETAIL
143.89
RRECREATION SECTION
1,045.00
6 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER PST
300.00
NEWSLETTER SECTION
229.40
1,574.40
LAND USE MAP
8.04
WESTERLINE- NECROPSY EXAM
65.00
3 /02ADMIN RECORD STORAGE
.72
3 /02COMM DEV RECORD STORA
32.98
3 /02CITY CLERK RECORD STO
31.58
65.28
6 /02VECTOR LEASE- WALNUT
320.65
COM CTR &CH LIGHT BULBS
122.27
COM CTR &CH LIGHT BULBS
75.29
197.56
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/22/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101.
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
3.09506
1101
05/22/02
109506
1101
05/22/02
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
TOTAL
CHECK
109507
1101
05/22/02
109508
1101
05/22/02
109509
1101
05/22/02
109509
1101
05/22/02
PARKS
TOTAL
CHECK
109510
1101
05/22/02
109511 1101 05/22/02
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
0
0
t�
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9205
AV PRK
PLUMBING REPAIR
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9252
CAMPUS
PRK RR REPAIR
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9252
PRKS TRUCK HARDWARE
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9204
PARKS
SAFETY GOGGLES
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
MPK PD
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
MPK PD
TOOLS
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
MPK PD
DRILL BIT
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
MPK PD
SUPPLIES
1636
WHITAKER IARDWARE,
INC
9252
PARKS
YARD PLUMBING REPAI
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9252
AV PRK
FOUNTAIN REPAIR
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9252
AV PRK
FOUNTAIN REPAIR
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9204
PARKS
IRRIGATION PARTS
1787
2843
1519
1519
3146
1643
WILLIS, PAMELA S 9160
WOLCO 9203
WORKPLACE, THE -SIMI VALLE 9236
WORKPLACE, THE -SIMI VALLE 9236
PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR PYMT
MAINTENANCE OFFICE TONER
PETERSON PRE -EMP PHYSICAL
NIELSEN PRE -EMP PHYSICAL
ZAMORA, MANNY 9244 SOFTBALL UMPIRE FORFEIT
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 MONTE VISTA NATURE PARK
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
17.13
2.90
10.59
16.06
12.85
13.93
4.82
7.01
10.57
21.37
6.86
5.09
129.18
1,212.00
244.95
60.00
60.00
120.00
20.00
144.79
28,134.08
28,134.08
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/22/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
2,197.10
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
17,870.01
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
98.83
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
75.08
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
450.99
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
33.26
2312
AD 84 -2 ZONE 12
405.62
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
2,360.01
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
550.00
2605
GAS TAX
1,656.34
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC ROUSE /INC
1,555.44
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
114.87
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS SC
691.53
6000
FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS
75.00
TOTAL REPORT
28,134.08
tgg4 �
C�
�J
RUN DATE 05/22/02 TIME 16:00:23 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
AMOUNT
SZABO -WEEK END 5/17 -36HR
810.00
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
69.45
CHECK REGISTER
90.00
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
100.00
REFUND - POINDEXTER DEPOSIT
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109512
1101
05/29/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
109513
1101
05/29/02
1007
ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC
9420
109513
1101
05/29/02
1007
ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC
9420
CEO RILEY UNFORM CLEANING
TOTAL CHECK
CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN
11.55
109514
1101
05/29/02
2860
B.T.R. INC.
9243
109515
1101
05/29/02
2414
BRANDCO BILLING
9254
109516
1101
05/29/02
1115
CATRAMBONE, JOSEPH F
9001
109517
1101
05/29/02
3111
CEJA. GERARDO
2606
109518
1101
05/29/02
2493
CHALLY, CRAIG M.
9001
109519
1101
05/29/02
3155
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LA
9220
109520
1101
05/29/02
2494
DEGUARDI, JONATHON Q.
9001
109521
1101
05/29/02
1177
DEMCO INC
9205
109521
1101
05/29/02
1177
DEMCO INC
9205
TOTAL CHECK
109522
1101
05/29/02
3063
DI SISTO TECH
9245
109523
1101
05/29/02
3156
DOWNTOWN RESEARCH & DEVEL
9220
109524
1101
05/29/02
1489
DRIVER ALLIANT
9243
109525
1101
05/29/02
3158
FETCHET, CATHERINE
3862
109526
1101
05/29/02
2634
FETCHET, ERIC
9244
109527
1101
05/29/02
1222
FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS
9020
109527
1101
05/29/02
1222
FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS
9020
TOTAL CHECK
109528
1101
05/29/02
2902
FITZWATER, RYAN D
9244
109529
1101
05/29/02
1525
FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
9222
109530
1101
05/29/02
1236
GALL'S INC
9254
109531
1101
05/29/02
2901
GONZALES, BRYAN
9244
109532
1101
05/29/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9208
109533
01101
05/29/02
3157
I.A.C.P.
9220
109534
�,;kllo1
05/29/02
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER
9102
109534
1101
05/29/02
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER
9102
TOTAL
CHECK
109535
1101
05/29/02
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
RUN DATE 05/30/02
TIME 09:25:22
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
SZABO -WEEK END 5/17 -36HR
810.00
5 /02FAX SERVICE
8.45
5 /02MSWERING SERVICE
61.00
69.45
5 /17SKATEFEST EVENT PIZZA
90.00
TRUCK #15 OIL CHANGE
23.47
5 /02COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
REFUND - POINDEXTER DEPOSIT
75.00
5 /02COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
COM DEV O1 PUBLICATIONS
234.90
5 /02COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
FREIGHT -MEDIA DISPLAY CAS
98.82
SINGLE TOWER HIGH CAPACIT
419.94
518.76
COMPUTERIZED USB MICROSCO
622.96
DOWNTOWN IDEA EXCHANGE
167.00
3RD OF JULY EVENT INSURAN
600.00
REFUND- PAJAMA PARTY
20.00
JBL OFFICIAL
130.00
CEO RILEY UNFORM CLEANING
10.40
CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN
11.55
21.95
JBL OFFICIAL
80.00
M RILEY -5/2 SELF - DISCIPLI
129.00
#28 AMBER LIGHT REPAIR
39.32
JBL OFFICIAL
60.00
VECTOR STORAGE & OPERATIN
139.86
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION MPK PD
25.00
CITY BUS #33 REPAIRS
332.74
CITY BUS #31 REPAIRS
349.46
682.20
STANFORD S/W REPAIRS
174.28
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
9.35
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.35
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11 /01
250.00
CHECK REGISTER
33.25
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
TRAN SAFETY SHOES
182.32
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109536
100.00
1101
05/29/02
1382
MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE
9103
109537
1101
05/29/02
1387
MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY
9204
109537
190.00
1101
05/29/02
1387
MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY
9204
156.00
6 -9/02 799 MPK AVE MONITO
TOTAL CHECK
6 -9/02 799 MPK AVE MONITO
161.78
6 -9/02 798 MPK AVE MONITO
109538
6 -9/02 4550 TR RD MONITOR
1101
05/29/02
3160
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR
9221
109539
20.49
1101
05/29/02
3159
NEW DIRECTIONS EVENT PLAN
2606
109540
3- 4 /02AVRC FUEL
1101
05/29/02
2724
OAKBROOK ENGRAVING & AWAR
9205
1.09541
133.97
1101
05/29/02
1426
OUTBACK FOOTWEAR
9020
109541
PENTAMATION - FUND
1101
05/29/02
1426
OUTBACK FOOTWEAR
9020
TOTAL CHECK
109542
1101
05/29/02
1210
PAS /EMECO
9250
109543
1101
05/29/02
1437
PEACH HILL SOILS
9310
109544
1101
05/29/02
1444
PFLAUMER, THOMAS E.
9001
109545
1101
05/29/02
3096
PHOENIX FOOD SERVICES
9223
109546
1101
05/29/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109546
1101
05/29/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
TOTAL CHECK
109547
1101
05/29/02
3161
RENO HILTON
9222
109548
1101
05/29/02
2898
RILEY, CLIFF P
9244
109549
1101
05/29/02
2300
RILEY, HUGH R
9225
109549
1101
05/29/02
2300
RILEY, HUGH R
9224
TOTAL CHECK
109550
1101
05/29/02
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
109550
1101
05/29/02
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
1.09550
1101
05/29/02
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
109550
1101
05/29/02
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
109550
1101
05/29/02
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
TOTAL CHECK
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OII, COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
109551
1101
05/29/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
TOTAL
CHECK
109552
1101
05/29/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9243
109552
1101
05/29/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9205
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:25:22
PAGE 2
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
6 /02SR CTR NEWS TYPESETTI 160.87
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.35
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.35
18.70
02 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
29.00
REFUND - SECURITY DEPOSIT
250.00
JAMES WALKER PLAQUE ENGRA
33.25
WESTERLINE SAFETY SHOES
182.32
TRAN SAFETY SHOES
182.32
364.64
USPS RATE CHANGE
181.60
STANFORD ST REPAIR
50.40
5 /02C0MPENSATI0N MTG
100.00
6 /10- 14EMERGEVCY MGT EOC
63.40
6 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER
291.72
5 /15CC MTG AGENDA PACKETS
203.35
495.07
LOC TRAN LODGING 6/12 -13
199.36
JBL OFFICIAL
90.00
EMERG MGT EOC PER DIEM
190.00
EMERGENCY MGT EOC MILEAGE
151.84
341.84
6 -9/02 675 MPK AVE MONITO
156.00
6 -9/02 799 MPK AVE MONITO
152.04
6 -9/02 799 MPK AVE MONITO
161.78
6 -9/02 798 MPK AVE MONITO
150.00
6 -9/02 4550 TR RD MONITOR
50.00
669.82
3- 4 /02VECTOR FUEL
131.96
3- 4 /02PW ADMIN FUEL
20.49
3- 4 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL
13.83
3- 4 /02PW STREETS FUEL
73.96
3- 4 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL
20.75
3- 4 /02AVRC FUEL
37.05
3- 4 /02CEO FUEL
46.83
3- 4 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL
51.53
3- 4 /02PARKS FUEL
133.97
530.37
SR GAMES & SUPPLIES
155.14
SR CTR HOSPITALITY SUPPLI
96.24
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
OS/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
11 /01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
TOTAL CHECK
109553
1101
05/29/02
1530
SOLUTIONS +
9203
CANON NP 6050 TONER
109554
1101
05/29/02
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO
9413
4/11 -5/10 213 E LA AVE
109555
1101
05/29/02
1574
THOMPSON, SANDRA G
9001
5 /02COMPENSATION MTG
109556
1101
05/29/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9602
NEW LA AVE WIDENING BLUEL
109557
1101
05/29/02
3162
VAN VORST, MATT
9243
BATTLE OF BANDS AUDIO TEC
109558
1101
05/29/02
1610
VENTURA COUNTY EMS
9222
WALTER,CASILLAS,HENDERSON
1.09559
1101
05/29/02
2843
WOLCO
9203
4/17- 5 /17COPY AREA COPIES
109559
1101
05/29/02
2843
WOLCO
9203
4/17- 5 /17ANNEX COPIES
109559
1101
05/29/02
2843
WOLCO
9203
4 /17- 5 /17POSTAGE AREA COP
TOTAL CHECK
109560
1101
05/29/02
2978
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO.
9244
50 ICE PACKS
109560
1101
05/29/02
2978
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO.
9244
FIRST AID KIT & ICE PACKS
109560
1101
05/29/02
2978
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO.
9244
CREDIT 50 ICE PACKS
TOTAL CHECK
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL
REPORT
pf
A 'Yi
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
251.38
193.05
56.22
100.00
14.56
50.00
180.00
97.71
90.78
149.43
337.92
67.03
266.95
-84.68
249.30
10,223.90
10,223.90
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:25:22 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
588.97
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
7,195.76
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
58.05
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
432.68
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
51.53
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
353.29
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
14.56
2605
GAS TAX
298.64
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
223.22
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
682.20
6000
FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS
325.00
TOTAL REPORT
10,223.90
0
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 09:25:25 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK
REGISTER
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-
- - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4/02H RILEY CELLPHONE
44.77
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02LINDLEY CELLPHONE
46.46
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02CHUDODA CELLPHONE
16.38
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4/02M RILEY CELLPHONE
23.46
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02KUENY CELLPHONE
50.20
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02HUNTER CELLPHONE
43.67
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9208
H RILEY CHARGER & CORD
75.05
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02SHIGLEY CEILPHONE
32.76
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02TRAFFENSTEDT CELLPHON
16.38
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02GILBERT CELLPHONE
21.84
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02PARKS CELLPHONE
29.12
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02MORGENSTERN CELLPHONE
32.18
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02MPK PD CELLPHONES
744.32
109561
1101
06/05/02
1003
A T & T WIRELESS
SERVICES
9424
4 /02JOHNSTON CELLPHONE
16.38
TOTAL CHECK
1,192.97
109562
1101
06/05/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
SZABO -WEEK END5/10 -31HRS
697.50
109562
1101
06/05/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
S7.ABO -WEEK END 5/3 -32HRS
720.00
TOTAL CHECK
1,417.50
109563
1101
06/05/02
1039
AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES,
3806
3 /02SUNCAL ADMIN REVENUE
- 213.75
109563
1101
06/05/02
1039
AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES,
2734
3 /02SUNCAL ADMIN FEE
213.75
109563
1101
06/05/02
1039
AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES,
2753
3 /02SUNCAL ENGINERING SRV
1,425.00
TOTAL CHECK
1,425.00
109564
1101
06/05/02
1063
BNY WESTERN TRUST
COMPANY
9102
5/02- 4 /03MRA TAX BOND
784.40
109564
1101
06/05/02
1063
BNY WESTERN TRUST
COMPANY
9102
5/02- 4 /03MRA TAX BOND
3,137.60
TOTAL CHECK
3,922.00
109565
1101
06/05/02
1070
BONTERRA CONSULTING
CORP
2734
12/01 -4/02N PRK ADMIN FEE
555.58
109565
1101
06/05/02
1070
BONTERRA CONSULTING
CORP
3806
12/01 -4/02N PRK ADMIN REV
- 555.58
109565
1101
06/05/02
1070
BONTERRA CONSULTING
CORP
2751
12/01- 4 /02NORTH PRK STUDY
3,703.87
TOTAL CHECK
3,703.87
109566
1101
06/05/02
2414
BRANDCO BILLING
9102
CITY BUS #32 4 REAR TIRES
1,168.88
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2734
01359 - 0102- 3 /02MOOR CD
23.10
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 3 /02MOOR RETAI
70.47
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE., WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01536 - 0141- 3 /02HMTON
2,699.35
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0098- 3 /02MOOR HR /PE
2,735.80
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359- 0102- 3 /02MOOR CD
154.00
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0103- 3 /02MOOR -CS
108.28
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359- 0099- 3 /02MOOR CPA
70.00
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 3 /02MOOR RETAI
12.43
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01536 - 0001- 3 /02CEO
1,257.90
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0144- 3 /02MPK VS VAL
883.85
3.09567
(F2+1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01359- 0145- 3 /02MISSION BE
5,165.25
109567
k.1 1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359- 0001- 3 /02MOOR RETAI
29.54
109567
f )1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359- 0105- 3 /02MOOR PW
126.30
109567
F- -1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
3803
01359 - 0151- 3 /02PARDEE HOM
-45.89
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359- 0105- 3 /02MOOR PW
216.60
109567
1101
Cillol
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359- 0102- 3 /02MOOR CD
42.00
109567
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
3803
01359 - 0132- 3 /02ENV COALIT
-12.30
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0098- 3 /02MOOR HR /PE
1,133.69
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01359- 0147- 3 /02MPK VS TAB
345.55
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 3 /02MOOR RETAI
619.22
RUN DATE
05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
2754
01359 - 0151- 3 /02PARDEE HOM
305.95
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
9123
01359 - 0143 -3/02A TRUCKING
236.60
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
2734
01359 - 0151- 3 /02PARDEE HOM
45.89
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
2734
01359- 0102- 3 /02MOOR CD
6.30
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 3 /02MOOR RETAI
109.27
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
3803
01359 - 0102- 3 /02MOOR CD
-29.40
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
2754
01359- 0132- 3 /02ENV COALIT
82.00
109567
1101
06/05/02
1083
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE
2734
01359- 0132- 3 /02ENV COALIT
12.30
TOTAL CHECK
16,404.05
109568
1101
06/05/02
3150
CALIFORNIA CD IMAGING CEN
9103
SCANNING,EDITING &OCR -1 CD
1,428.57
109569
1101
06/05/02
1100
CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS
9233
97 -01 GENERAL LIAB RETRO
11,100.00
109569
1101
06/05/02
1100
CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS
9011
97 -01 WORKERS COMP RETRO
3,356.00
TOTAL CHECK
14,456.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.333- 3 /02TRI CITY MORTG
529.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.381- 4 /02ADELPHIA WORLD
335.00
1.09572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.373- 3 /02THREE D ENTERP
132.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9143
4 /02PLAN CHECK RESIDENTIA
6,457.12
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.335- 4 /02ZELMAN DEV -TAR
1.3,130.49
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 4 /02CITY ENG RETAI
347.62
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 4 /02CITY ENG RETAT
2,085.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9147
4 /02NON- RESIDENT PERMIT
3,180.16
109572
3.101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.336- 4 /02ZELMAN DEV -TAR
173.95
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2106
4 /02TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
47,153.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711.
87.328- 4 /02LFNNAR HOMES
415.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.427- 4 /02ARCHSTONE APTS
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.284 -4/02 5950 CONDOR
101.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.035- 4 /02KAUFMAN & BROA
1,258.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.237- 4 /02CABRILLO ECONO
1,924.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.333- 4 /02TRI CITY MORTG
101.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.373- 4 /02THREE D ENTERP
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.027- 4 /02RICE DEV CONDO
86.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.325- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
2,475.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9103
92.012- 4 /02RJR ENGINEERIN
78.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.428- 4 /02ARCHSTONE APTS
58.50
109572
1101.
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.080- 4 /02HORST WELBAT
385.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.402- 4 /02CARD SRVC /GLUC
188.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9146
4 /02RESIDENTIAL PERMIT FE
21,001.80
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.203- 4 /02DALY & ASSOC
53.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9154
81.002- 3 /02TRAFFIC ENG RE
439.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.061 -3/02 10709 PIMPLIC
15.05
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 4 /02CITY ENG RETAI
347.63
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.334- 3 /02ZELMAN DEV -TAR
680.05
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.203- 3 /02DALY & ASSOC
100.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.341 -3/02G MOLINEUX
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 3 /02CITY ENG RETAI
347.63
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.402- 3 /02CARD SRV /GLUCK
460.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.381- 3 /02ADELPHIA WORLD
10,751.75
3.09572 >
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.021- 3 /02RICE DEV -CONDO
68.25
109572�'•��
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
92.030 -4/02 02 OVERLAY PR
1,143.00
109572 F
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 3 /02CITY ENG RETAI
347.62
109572 k
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
92.040 -3/02 02 SLURRY SEA
6,479.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
91.530- 3/02SR23 BYPASS LA
1,406.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
92.030 -3/02 02 OVERLAY PR
19.50
RUN DATE
05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- -
- - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.232- 3 /02CABRILLO ECONO
36.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
86.370- 3 /02MORRISON -SPEC
552.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9144
4 /02PLAN CHECK NON RESIDE
1,096.33
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2106
4 /02TOTAL BILLABLE FEES
- 31,735.41
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.070- 3 /02NATIONAL READY
456.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.241 -4/02D MOOREHEAD
930.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
96.372- 3 /02MORRISON SPEC
513.05
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
92.040 -4/02 02 SLURRY SEA
611.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
85.063- 4 /02WEST AMERICA
2,129.31
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.041- 3 /02SHEA HOMES
9.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.171- 3 /02COPTIC CHURCH
9.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.020- 3 /02CYPRESS LAND
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.150- 3 /02SELF STORAGE
168.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.241 -3/02D MOOREHEAD
121.00
1.09572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
91.530- 4/02SR23 BYPASS LA
9,980.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.500- 3 /02SHARMA,IPD O1
29.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.307- 3 /02LENNAR HOMES
1,153.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
84.246- 3 /02CNTRY CLUB EST
8,494.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.427- 3 /02ARCHSTONE APTS
250.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.428- 3 /02ARCHSTONE APTS
58.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.035- 3 /02KAUFMAN & BROA
243.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.037- 3 /02KAUFMAN & BROA
39.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.237- 3 /02CABRILLO ECONO
6,306.83
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.377- 2 /02MPK HIGH SCHOO
180.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.234- 3 /02CABRILLO ECONO
164.35
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.236- 3 /02CABRILLO ECONO
302.38
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.309- 3 /02WM LYON HOMES
1,239.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.328- 3 /02LENNAR HOMES
146.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.235- 3 /02CABRILLO ECONO
8,953.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.425- 3 /02ARCHSTONE APTS
9,105.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.375- 3 /02MPK HIGH SCHOO
44.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.327- 3 /02LENNAR LLA
286.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
86.376- 3 /02PARDEE HOMES
29.20
109572
1.101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.230- 3 /02CABRILLO ECON
81.25
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
86.378- 3 /02MORRISON -PARDE
1,738.80
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.309- 4 /02WM LYON HOMES
894.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.310- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
162.55
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.311- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
73.10
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.322- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
17.10
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.315- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
31,831.81
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9103
92.013- 4 /02RBF MILLER PKW
39.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.041- 4 /02SHEA HOMES
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
88.171- 4 /02COPTIC CHURCH
331.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
84.246- 4 /02CNTRY CLUB EST
2,191.69
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
86.370- 4 /02MORRISON SPEC
9,624.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.314- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
1,181.88
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711.
86.372- 4 /02MORRISON SPEC
178.50
109572
q'
-,J
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.324- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
13.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.021- 4 /02RICE DEV CONDO
19.50
109572
�.�
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.323- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
23,524.89
109572
°p
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.163- 3 /02TOLL 1B 6685
371.70
109572
!
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9153
81.001- 3 /02CITY ENG RETAI
2,085.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.090- 3 /02LARRY CAVEN
39.20
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9157
81.003- 3 /02ENCROACHMENTS
6,546.40
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.470- 3 /02MTN MEADOWS
1,750.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9157
81.003- 4 /02ENCROACHMENTS
10,916.50
RUN
DATE
05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9154
81.002- 4 /02TRAFFIC ENG RE
439.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
91.520- 4 /02MILLER PRKWY
4,021.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
83.420- 3 /02LA AVE EAST AL
32,333.08
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9103
91.480- 3 /02GRIMES CYN STU
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.306- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
6,745.70
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.020- 4 /02CYPRESS LAND
112.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
91.520- 3 /02MILLER PRKWY
539.50
3.09572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
90.150- 4 /02SELF STORAGE
19.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.500- 4 /02SHARMA IPD 01
335.75
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
86.345- 4 /02PAC COM /MP GRO
392.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.510- 3 /02LUCY BERMUDEZ
875.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.020 -3/02 6717 ASPEN HI
51.10
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.055- 3 /02PEACH HILL LLC
2,620.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
9601
83.420- 4 /02LA AVE EAST AL
3,297.71
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.284- 3 /02JIN IND CONDOR
321.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.027- 3 /02RICE DEV CONDO
388.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.327- 2 /02LENNAR LLA
664.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.321- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
192.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.312- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
36.35
109572
1.101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
89.055- 4 /02PEACH HILL LLC
1,143.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
87.307- 4 /02LENNAR HOMES
183.50
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
91.383- 4 /02ADELPHIA
6,512.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.081- 4 /02HORST WELBAT
147.00
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
1308
6 /02NOTE PAYMENT
- 12,661.11
109572
1101
06/05/02
1120
CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES
2711
92.100- 4 /02RON WIDINER
30.10
TOTAL CHECK
288,634.71
109573
11.01
06/05/02
1123
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9601
SPRING RD WIDE PRELIM REP
500.00
109573
1101
06/05/02
1123
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9601
SPRING RD WIDE PRELIM REP
500.00
TOTAL CHECK
1,000.00
109574
1101
06/05/02
2873
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9102
ESCROW CLOSING COSTS
425.00
109574
1101
06/05/02
2873
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9285
SP #18 MOBILEHOME PURCHASE
19,000.00
TOTAL CHECK
19,425.00
109575
1101
06/05/02
3009
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9285
SP #13 DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTA
25,499.00
109576
1101
06/05/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
REPLACE IRRIGATION TIMER
1,080.34
109576
1101
06/05/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9205
PCH HILL PRK SPRINKLERS
323.44
TOTAL CHECK
1,403.78
109577
1101
06/05/02
1143
COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GR
9630
ARROYO VISTA COMM PARK
1,461.70
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ CPU TO SERVER CONS
70.17
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 176496 -B22 36.4GB
401.22
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 176496 -B22 36.4GB
203.14
109578
��
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ PROLIANT DL380 G2
652.23
109578
(.J
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ PROLIANT DL380 G2
1,288.19
109578.
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ PROLIANT DL380 G2
821.27
109578
"'
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ TFT5600
517.98
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ TFT5600
1,023.05
109578
„
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ TFT5600
652.23
109578
p
J
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ (42U) RACK CABINET
253.29
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ (42U) RACK CABINET
500.27
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 176496 -B22 36.4GB
255.79
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ (42U) RACK CABINET
318.94
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ UPS R1500 XR
165.91
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 100KG GRAPHITE SLI
155.02
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 100KG GRAPHITE SLI
306.16
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 100KG GRAPHITE SLI
195.19
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 1X8 PORT KVM SWITC
189.97
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 1X8 PORT KVM SWITC
375.20
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ 1X8 PORT KVM SWITC
239.20
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ CPU TO SERVER CONS
55.72
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9208
COMPAQ CPU TO SERVER CONS
110.06
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ UPS R1500 XR
327.68
109578
1101
06/05/02
2884
COMPAQ
9503
COMPAQ UPS R1500 XR
208.90
TOTAL CHECK
9,286.78
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
PORT NOTEWORTHY USB /PS2
46.12
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
IMATION 50PK CDR MEDIA
17.70
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
SOUND BLASTF.R,SPEAKERS,HE
226.30
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
ADAPTEC SCSI CARD KIT
224.15
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
LABTEC SPIN -50 AMPLIFIED
23.60
109579
1101
06/05/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
CISCO AIRCARD WIRELESS PC
255.26
TOTAL CIiECK
793.13
109580
1101
06/05/02
3098
CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC, INC.
9102
CITY BUS #33 REPAIRS
1,060.29
109581
1101
06/05/02
1176
DECISION MANAGEMENT CO.,
9102
7 /02- 6 /03QUESTYS UPGRADE
2,319.75
109581
1101
06/05/02
1176
DECISION MANAGEMENT CO.,
9102
7 /01- 6 /02QUESTYS UPGRADE
2,319.75
109581
1101
06/05/02
1176
DECISION MANAGEMENT CO.,
9102
40HR TECHNICAL SUPPORT
5,000.00
TOTAL CHECK
9,639.50
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS 200 FOOT CTL/
9.33
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS 200 FOOT CTL/
1,845.96
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS SERIAL CONTRO
.63
7.09582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS SERIAL CONTRO
124.61
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS JOYSTICK CONT
26.39
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS JOYSTICK CONT
5,224.18
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS QUAD CONTROL
17.23
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS QUAD CONTROL
3,410.50
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
FUJINON 14X TELECONFERENC
11,770.27
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS LENS MODIFICA
2.14
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
SHIPPING - FUJINON 14X LENS
227.17
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS LENS MODIFICA
424.56
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS DESKTOP MOUNT
1.35
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS DESKTOP MOUNT
267.67
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS QUAD POWER SU
10.03
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS QUAD POWER SU
1,984.45
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS PAN /TILT HEAD
54.09
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS PAN /TILT HEAD
10,706.81
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS PRESET OPTION
8.58
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
TELEMETRICS PRESET OPTION
1,698.33
109582-°
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
RACK MOUNT SHELVES
.47
109582
1101
06/05/02
3002
DIGITAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
9504
RACK MOUNT SHELVES
92.28
fL"I
TOTAL CHECK
37,907.03
109583
E�
06/05/02
1187
DIVERSIFIED IMAGES INC
9232
PW CITY SEAL DECALS
505.72
109583
1101
06/05/02
1187
DIVERSIFIED IMAGES INC
9204
PARKS CITY SEAL DECALS
453.00
109583
1101
06/05/02
1187
DIVERSIFIED IMAGES INC
9240
PUB TRANSP CITY SEAL DECA
368.00
109583
1101
06/05/02
1187
DIVERSIFIED IMAGES INC
9205
COM SRV CITY SEAL DECALS
106.28
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 11 :38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
AMOUNT
MPK PD CITY SEAL DECALS
876.48
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
1,295.04
CHECK REGISTER
1,406.42
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
5 /02AVRC JANITORIAL
960.00
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109583
REIMBURSABLES
1101
06/05/02
1167
DIVERSIFIED IMAGES INC
9254
REIMBURSABLES
100.61
TOTAL CHECK
7,540.40
SP #13 RESIDENTIAL MOVING
1,100.00
109584
12,915.00
1101
06/05/02
2823
HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT
9610
109585
4 /02FINANCE PHONE
1101
06/05/02
3018
HATCHER, EDDIE
9285
109586
59.84
1101
06/05/02
1289
HUGG, JOHN A
9160
109587
4 /02GLENWOOD PRK PAYPHONE
1101
06/05/02
1303
IZADSEPAS, MINA G
9160
109588
1,624.49
1101
06/05/02
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
109589
4 /02VALLEY COMPUTER SRVCS
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
6,156.32
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
3 /02MPK BUS SRVC & MAINT
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
109589
1101
06/05/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
TOTAL CHECK
109590
1101
06/05/02
3163
MAUNU, MAURICE
9285
109591
1101
06/05/02
3163
MAUNU, MAURICE
9285
109592
1101
06/05/02
2530
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN
9103
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
109593
1101
06/05/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9421
TOTAL CHECK
109594
1101
06/05/02
2217
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL
9102
109594
1101
06/05/02
2217
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL
9103
109594
1101
06/05/02
2217
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL
9103
109594
1101
06/05/02
2217
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL
9103
109594
1101
06/05/02
2217
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL
9252
TOTAL CHECK
109595
1101
06/05/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9351
109595
``.,::'
1101
06/05/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9351
R
TOTAL CHECK
109596
t.'!
1101
06/05/02
2354
PARKING COMPANY OF AMERIC
9102
109596
1101
06/05/02
2354
PARKING COMPANY OF AMERIC
9102
TOTAL CHECK
RUN DATE
05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PAGE 6
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
MPK PD CITY SEAL DECALS
876.48
2,309.48
LOS ANGELES AVENUE /BELTRA
2,187.50
SP #17 INCIDENTAL FEES
1,295.04
GYMNASTICS CLASS INSTRUCT
1,406.42
CARDIO KICK,YOGA,FITNESS
1,184.22
5 /02AVRC JANITORIAL
960.00
AMENDMENT #1 TO AGREEMENT
879.49
REIMBURSABLES -NOT TO EXCE
125.64
PHASE 2- TRAFFIC SIG MODIF
1,444.87
REIMBURSABLES
111.34
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
2,509.79
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
2,368.66
REIMBURSABLES
100.61
7,540.40
SP #13 RESIDENTIAL MOVING
1,100.00
#13 RNTL ASSISTANCE FINAL
12,915.00
4 /02GRAVES -ACCT SRVC -133H
8,677.50
4/02C MGR PHONE
7.85
4 /02CITYWIDE PHONE
1,093.70
4 /02FINANCE PHONE
7.85
4/02C CLERK PHONE
7.85
4 /02CAMPUS PRK PAYPHONE
59.84
4 /02POINDEXTER PRK PAYPHO
59.84
4 /02EMERGENCY MGR PHONE
132.12
4 /02VECTOR PHONE
21.92
4 /02CAMPUS CYN PRK PAYPHO
59.84
4 /02GLENWOOD PRK PAYPHONE
59.84
4 /02MILLER PRK PAYPHONE
59.84
4 /02COMM CTR PRK PAYPHONE
54.00
1,624.49
4 /02RELOCATION SRVCS
7,350.00
4 /02ADMIN FEES
372.98
4 /02PROPERTY MNGT SRVCS
1,330.00
4 /02VALLEY COMPUTER SRVCS
191.52
4 /02MOBILEHOME PRK MAINTE
2,295.00
11,539.50
5 /02CITY STREETS SWEEPING
6,156.32
5 /02TIERRA REJADA SWEEPIN
29.70
6,186.02
4 /02MPK BUS SRVC & MAINT
14,857.88
3 /02MPK BUS SRVC & MAINT
13,664.34
28,522.22
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT
109597
1101
06/05/02
1793
109598
1101
06/05/02
2856
109598
1101
06/05/02
2856
109598
1101
06/05/02
2856
3/15- 4 /15MPK MOBILEHOME
TOTAL CHECK
3/15- 4 /15VECTOR
109599
1101
06/05/02
2820
109600
1101
06/05/02
1513
109600
1101
06/05/02
1513
115.32
TOTAL CHECK
7.13
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
1.09601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601.
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
1101
06/05/02
1536
109601
<`'� 1101
06/05/02
1536
p TOTAL CHECK
109602
-3 1101
06/05/02
1438
109602
1101
06/05/02
1438
109602
1101
06/05/02
1438
109602
1101
06/05/02
1438
RUN DATE 05/30/02
TIME 11:38:54
PEDERSEN FENCE & PATIO CO 9632
RLF PUBLISHING 9232
RLF PUBLISHING 9240
RLF PUBLISHING 9232
SCE 9413
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 941.3
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413
SUNGARI) PENTAMATION INC 9102
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9223
PAGE 7
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT
CAMPUS CYN PRK FENCE INST 8,925.00
RECREATION /PDF FILE
3,875.89
NEWSLETTER SECTION
2,574.11
BLUE LINE CHANGES
35.00
6,485.00
6/02 PREVIOUSLY NOT BILLE
1,551.79
4 /02INSURANCE ADJUSTMENT
72.15
4 /02INTERSECTION MAINTENA
1,333.50
1,405.65
3/15- 4 /15MPK MOBILEHOME
471.79
3/15- 4 /15VECTOR
66.10
3 /15- 4 /15CITY LIMITS
22,699.92
3/15- 4 /15CNTRY TRAIL PRK
12.53
3 /15- 4 /15VILLA CAMPESINA
65.43
3/15- 4 /15MTN MEADOWS
170.09
3 /15- 4 /15VIRGINIA COLONY
10.77
3 /15- 4 /15TIERRA REJADA
115.32
3 /15- 4 /15SCHOOL PROPERTY
7.13
3 /15- 4 /15GLENWOOD PRK
13.08
3/15- 4 /15ARROYO VISTA PRK
1,780.68
3 /15- 4 /15GRIFFIN PARK
79.84
3/15- 4 /15PCH HILL PRK
544.31
3 /15- 4 /15CAMPUS CANYON
29.91
3/15- 4 /15PRKWYS & MEDIANS
108.04
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 12
171.43
3 /15- 4 /15ZONE 1
17.51
3 /15- 4 /15ZONE 11
12.53
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 2
42.28
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 4
13.70
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 5
14.19
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 6
12.96
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 7
38.88
3 /15- 4 /15METROLINK LIGHTS
135.73
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 8
41.48
3 /15- 4 /15CAMPUS PARK
45.01
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 9
1.90
3/15- 4 /15ZONE 10
114.94
3 /15- 4 /15REDEVELOPMENT
14.08
3 /15- 4 /15COMM CTR
1,199.77
3/15- 4 /15ST MAINT
66.95
3 /15- 4 /15AV COMM CTR
935.42
3 /15- 4 /15CITY HALL
1,487.95
3/15 -4/15 798 MPK AVE
102.41
3 /15- 4 /15TRAFFIC SIGNALS
1,232.50
3/15- 4 /15PCH HILL PK BLFL
984.30
32,860.86
5/02- 4 /03HR & FINANCE MNT
6,867.79
5 /02- 4 /03COGNOS MAINT
3,112.80
5/02- 4 /03A /R MODULE MAINT
1,583.73
JOHNSTON -WEST COAST CONF
1,335.00
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109602
1101
06/05/02
1438
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC
9102
4 /02DATA LINE CHARGES
96.89
109602
1101
06/05/02
1438
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC
9102
5 /02- 5 /03LICENSING SRVCS
1,051.05
TOTAL CHECK
14,047.26
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z4 WMS RCH PKWYS,PLNT
268.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z2 SPRING,CHR BARR,TR
2,468.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02AV PRK & PED BRIDGE
5,612.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z5 PCH HILL TO TR
1,149.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z3 PEPRML,BTR CRK ENT
137.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02VILLA CAMPESINA PRK
284.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02MTN MEADOWS PRK
2,468.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02MILLER PRK
735.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02TIERRA REJADA PRK
2,520.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02PRKWYS & MEDIANS
5,491.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02MONTE VISTA PRK
326.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/0221 PECAN,BAMBI,BENWOO
84.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02CNTRY TRAIL PRK
1,680.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02GLENWOOD PRK
1,018.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02Z9MPK BUS CTR PLNTRS
53.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z7 MPK SQ IND PK
420.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/0228 HOME ACRES BUFFER
315.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02POINDEXTER PRK
735.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02CIVIC /COMM CTR
525.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02METROLINK STATION
299.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02VIRGINIA COLONY PRK
315.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02CAMPUS PRK
803.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9252
5/02 661 MPK AVE
42.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02COMM CTR PRK
194.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02GRIFFIN PRK
1,208.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02CAMPUS CYN PRK
2,520.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5 /02PCH HILL PRK
2,520.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02 798 MPK AVE
80.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9252
5/02 18 HIGH ST
68.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z6 GLENHAVEN W END IN
49.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z10 MTN MEADOWS COMM
7,824.00
109603
1101
06/05/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
5/02Z11 COLMER ALYSSAS CT
32.00
TOTAL CHECK
42,242.00
109604
1101
06/05/02
3164
TERRA TITLE COMPANY
9285
REPLACEMENT HOUSING FINAL
8,500.00
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2734
1- 4 /02SDI
73.50
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2734
1- 4 /02WEST POINTE ADMN FE
178.50
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2734
1- 4 /02TOLL BROS ADMIN FEE
923.70
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2751
1- 4 /02WEST POINTE
1,190.00
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
3806
1- 4 /02TOLL BROS ADMIN REV
- 923.70
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
9103
PRELIM REDEVELOP PROJ ASM
630.00
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2751
1 /1- 4/30/02 SDI
490.00
109605
Fa.y�
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2734
1- 4 /02SUNCAL ADMIN FEE
6.75
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2751
1- 4 /02SUNCAL
45.00
1.09605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
3806
1- 4 /02SDI ADMIN FEE
-73.50
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
3806
1- 4 /02SUNCAL ADMIN REVENU
-6.75
109605
'.;;?,
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
2751
1/02- 4 /02TOLL BROS
6,158.00
109605
1101
06/05/02
1572
THE PLANNING CORPORATION
3806
1- 4 /02WEST POINTE ADMN RE
- 178.50
�d
TOTAL CHECK
8,513.00
109606
1101
06/05/02
3165
TRINDEL, JAMES & SANDRA
9285
#18 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EX
1,325.00
RUN DATE
05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT
109607
8,227.00
1101
06/05/02
3165
109608
4 /02MINI VAN CHARGES
1101
06/05/02
2289
109609
5,285.08
1101
06/05/02
1604
3.09610
4 /02TRAFFIC SRVCS
1101
06/05/02
2283
10961.1
9,489.20
1101
06/05/02
1153
109611
4 /02MIDDLE SCHOOL RESOURC
1101.
06/05/02
1153
296,590.04
TOTAL CHECK
140.91
109612
170.94
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
3 /5- 5 /7PRKWYS & MEDIANS
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
77.81
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
3 /12- 5 /14PRKWYS & MEDIANS
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
44.00
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
3/5- 5 /7MPK MOBILEHOME PRK
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
2,823.12
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
1101
06/05/02
1616
109612
1101
06/05/02
1616
TOTAL CHECK
109613
1101
06/05/02
1617
109613
1101
06/05/02
1617
109613
1101
06/05/02
1617
TOTAL CHECK
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
109614
1101
06/05/02
1620
TOTAL CHECK
109615
1101
06/05/02
1621
109615
1101
06/05/02
1621
TOTAL CHECK
(
109616
1101
06/05/02
1626
109616
1101
06/05/02
1626
TOTAL CHECK
RUN
DATE 05/30/02
TIME 11:38:54
TRINDEL, JAMES & SANDRA 9285
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE /ASCOM 9231
VALERIO, BENITO 9102
VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331
VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL REG 9102
VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL REG 9102
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9254
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9254
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9118
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733
VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9232
VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9601
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9252
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415
VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102
VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9504
VTR SERVICE CO INC 9251
VTR SERVICE CO INC 9251
PAGE 9
- - -- - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
#18 RENTAL ASSISTANCE PYM 7,014.00
CITY HALL POSTAGE METER 3,000.00
5 /02MPK PD JANITORIAL SRV 1,100.00
5/02 Z12 LANDSCAPE SRVC 3,778.50
1- 3 /02ANIMAL REG & CONT
8,227.00
1- 3 /02ADDTNL SRVCS
138.52
8,365.52
4 /02MINI VAN CHARGES
127.00
4 /02VEHICLE CI4ARGES
10,911.93
4 /02ADMIN ASSISTANT
5,285.08
4 /02SPECIAL ENF DETAIL
10,185.50
4 /02HIGH SCHOOL RESOURCE
9,151.08
4 /02TRAFFIC SRVCS
23,040.92
4 /02INVESTIGATIVE SRVCS
30,349.17
4 /020VERTIME -REG & COURT
9,489.20
4 /02PATROL SRVCS
169,729.67
4 /02COMM SRVC
10,018.33
4 /02MIDDLE SCHOOL RESOURC
9,151.08
4 /02DARE OFFICER -5TH GR
9,151.08
296,590.04
4 /19COLMER DEV PUBLIC HEA
140.91
4 /14MPK CITY TRANSIT
170.94
4 /12,17MILLER PRKWY BIDS
1,292.95
1,604.80
3 /5- 5 /7PRKWYS & MEDIANS
142.65
3 /5- 5 /7ZONE 9 WATER
153.61
3/5 -5 /7PW BLDG WATER
77.81
3 /5- 5 /7VIRGINIA COLONY
870.45
3 /5- 5 /7COMM CTR WATER
1,022.01
3 /12- 5 /14PRKWYS & MEDIANS
416.80
3/12- 5 /14ZONE 3
73.80
3 /5- 5 /7VECTOR WATER
44.00
3 /5- 5 /7METROLINK WATER
166.43
3 /5- 5 /7REDEVELOPMENT
435.72
3/5- 5 /7MPK MOBILEHOME PRK
1,420.88
3/12- 5 /14VILLA CAMPESINA
17.08
3 /12- 5 /14GLENWOOD PK
2,823.12
3/12- 5 /14ZONE 7
1,129.22
3/12- 5 /14POINDEXTER PK
2,651.77
11,445.35
STATE OF CITY ADDRESS TAP 947.50
VIDEO SYSTEM SUPPLY REIMB 2,609.62
3,557.12
VTR REPAIR 645.83
VTR REPAIR 623.63
1,269.46
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
109617 1101 06/05/02
109617 1101 06/05/02
109617 1101 06/05/02
TOTAL CHECK
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
n
F�- 46.
CsN
h
IT
2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING
2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 MONTE VISTA PRK TREE TRIM
2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 ZONE 5 TREE TRIMMING
PAGE 10
AMOUNT
1,257.70
40.13
2,006.50
3,304.33
995,562.23
995,562.23
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 11:38:54 PRNTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
05/30/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
41,739.03
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
372,152.76
2002
CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT
17,240.95
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
1,461.70
2112
ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 2
8,925.00
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
74,242.65
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
30,123.24
2301
AD 84 -2 ZONE 1
101.51
2302
AD 84 -2 ZONE 2
2,510.28
2303
AD 84 -2 ZONE 3
210.80
2304
AD 84 -2 ZONE 4
281.70
2305
AD 84 -2 ZONE 5
3,169.69
2306
AD 84 -2 ZONE 6
61.96
2307
AD 84 -2 ZONE 7
1,588.10
2308
AD 84 -2 ZONE 8
356.48
2309
AD 84 -2 ZONE 9
208.51
2310
AD 84 -2 ZONE 10
7,938.94
2311
AD 84 -2 ZONE 11
44.53
2312
AD 84 -2 ZONE 12
3,949.93
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
35,944.41
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
43,874.59
2502
TIERRA REJADA A.O.C.
- 9,814.11
2603
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A
8,253.00
2605
GAS TAX
9,528.67
2609
OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS
15,597.58
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
91,289.61
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
10,568.20
4003
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN
6,073.80
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
31,891.49
6001
MESSENGER
94.30
6015
SUNCAL
1,690.50
6026
SDI
563.50
6044
COLMER, WAYNE
140.91
6047
WEST AMERICA
2,129.31
6078
WESTPOINT HOMES
1,368.50
6148
PACIFIC COMMUNITIES
392.00
6193
CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR
41,654.64
6262
ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES
9,492.75
6291
FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD
1,570.25
6302
FELSENTHAL, JERROLD S.
423.00
6328
COPTIC CHURCH /ARCH ANG
341.25
6350
CABRILLO EDC 5161
17,769.06
6360
ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL
818.00
6364
RICE
562.25
6375
PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W
3,763.50
6385
RICHMOND AM H
27,449.49
6392
THREE D ENTER /PINECREST S
152.00
6399
TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI
18,139.34
6407
WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING
177.10
6431
CARDSERVICE
648.25
6437
CYPRESS LAND COMPANY
3.31.50
f.aa✓✓
6480
M&M DEVELOPMENT
1,051.00
6489
NATIONAL, READY MIX
456.50
6513
ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER
3.4,032.79
`*
6534
NORTH PARK VILLAGE
4,259.45
6541
SHARMA GENERAL
365.00
6546
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
2,134.25
6548
PARDEE CONSTRUCTION
12,988.64
RUN DATE 05/30/02
TIME 11:38:58
PENTAMATION
- FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE 1
05/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT
6903
CHEESMAN CONSTRUCTION
15.05
6904
DALY & ASSOC
153.50
6906
GRAHAM MOLINEUX
19.50
6907
MOORPARK HS PARKING LOT
224.00
6908
ADELPHIA
17,598.75
6910
HOWSEMAN
51.10
6912
ANTHONY CAVEN
39.20
6913
THOMAS CONSTRUCTION
1,750.00
6914
LUCY BERMUDEZ
875.00
6915
RON WIDINER
30.10
6916
HORST WELBAT
532.00
TOTAL REPORT
995,562.23
RUN DATE 05/30/02 TIME 11 :38 :58 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
ITEM ILISO
Moorpark City Counci'�
Agenda Report Y:- --W- --
TO: The Honorable City Council +�
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 6 -5 -02)
SUBJECT: Consider 1) Bids for the Construction of Modifications
at the Intersection of Miller Parkway and Peach Hill Road
to Facilitate U -Turn Traffic [Project 80321 2) Adoption
of a Resolution Amending the Budget to Fully Fund the
Project and 3) Recordation of a Deed for Certain
Additional Right -of -Way and Temporary Construction
Easements Required by the Project
BACKGROUND
In April of 2001, the City Council approved a project to widen the
northbound barrel of Miller Parkway just north of Peach Hill Road,
in order to facilitate south -to -north "U- Turn" traffic movements
at that intersection. In March of this year, the City Council
approved the plans and authorized staff to advertise for bids.
DISCUSSION
A. Project Description
An excerpt of the project plan, showing the required street
widening, is attached as Exhibit 1. The Scope of Work is
generally described as follows:
• Relocate traffic signal pole at easterly ECR (End Curb
Radius);
• Replace traffic signal pole and mast arm at westerly BCR
(Beginning Curb Radius) [Note: the wider street will
require a longer mast arm for the signal heads which, in
turn, will require a larger pole];
• Relocate traffic signal pull boxes;
• Relocate catch basin east of intersection;
• Remove and replace curb & gutter;
• Remove and replace sidewalk;
Miller mod awd
/'-'
Miller Parkway Modification
U -Turn Traffic Movement
May 24, 2002
Page 2
• Construct asphalt pavement;
• Transplant tree;
• Replace irrigation system;
• Replant ground cover and shrubs; and
• Regrading at back of sidewalk.
B. Right -of -Way
As shown on Exhibit 1, additional street right -of -way is
required for the construction of the project. A deed conveying
this additional right -of -way from the Serenata HOA to the City,
has been provided to the City. Also conveyed to the City is a
Construction Easement required to facilitate the work. It is
recommended that the City Council accept these deeds and direct
the City Clerk to have the deeds and Certificates of Acceptance
recorded.
C. Hardware Procurement
The delivery time for the procurement of poles and mast arms is
approximately fourteen (14) weeks. In order to expedite this
project, the City initiated the procurement of the needed poles
and mast arms, immediately after project advertisement was
authorized. Accordingly, we believe that these materials will
be received in July, at about the time they will be needed.
D. Bid Results
Bids for the subject project were received and opened on May
21St. The apparent low bidder is Berry General Engineering
Contractors, Inc., with a bid of $101,467.75. A summary of
the bid results is attached as Exhibit 2.
It has been determined that the apparent low bidder is
qualified to perform the work. Said bidder has confirmed that
their bid is valid and that they are prepared to proceed with
the construction of the project.
Miller mod awd
Miller Parkway Modification
U -Turn Traffic Movement
May 24, 2002
Page 3
E. Fiscal Impact
1. Construction Cost Estimate
costs is as follows:
Description
Bid Amount
Contingency [10 %]
Pole Procurement
Sub -Total
Total
An estimate of construction
Construction
Cost Est. ($)
101,467.75
10,146.78
111,614.53
5,078.00
116,692.53
2. Total Project Cost Estimate: An estimate of the total
project construction costs is as follows:
Total Project
Description Cost Est. ($)
Design 14,000.00
R -O -W '' 500.00
Construction 116,692.53
Inspection 3,000.00
Total 134,192.53
** Cost of Policy of Title Insurance only. There was no
compensation made to the Grantor of the right -of -way and
Temporary Construction Easement.
3. Budget Amendment:
It will be necessary to
amend the
FY2001 /02 Budget in
order to fully
fund this
project. A
Resolution has been
attached (Exhibit
3) for this purpose.
A summary of the proposed
Budget amendment is as
follows:
Description
Current Budget
Change
Revised Total
Design
14,000.00
0.00
14,000.00
Right -of -Way
0.00
500.00
500.00
Construction
85,000.00
32,000.00
117,000.00
Plus Prior Design Costs
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
Total Project
100,000.00
34,500.00
134,500.00
Note: The funding source for this project [Project 80321
is the Traffic Mitigation Fund [Fund 20021.
F. Schedule
It is anticipated that construction of the project should
start in late June and be completed in August.
Mi11er mod awd
4�i.f i l'�4 4
Miller Parkway Modification
U -Turn Traffic Movement
May 24, 2002
Page 4
G. Administrative Actions
If the recommended action is taken by the City Council,
certain administrative actions will be undertaken by staff,
including the following:
• A contract agreement will be forwarded to Berry General
Engineering Contractors, for the construction of the
subject project, for the contract price of $101,467.75.
• When all of the contract documents are in order, the
agreement will be executed by the City Manager.
• A construction contingency of $10,150 (100) will be set
aside for the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (Roll Call Vote)
1. Approve the selection of Berry Engineering Contractors, Inc.
to construct the subject project.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- providing additional funding
required for the project.
3. Direct the City Clerk to provide for the recordation of the
Deeds and Certificates of Acceptance for the additional
right -of -way and temporary construction easement required for
the project.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Miller mod awd
Plan
Bid Results
Resolution
ac
41 k PROPOSED LAJ
SIDEWALK 13 4
EA SEMEN T
AIS
-,EXISTING R
EXISTING STRIPING TO PEMAIN lk 1,
kk
EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
G SIDEWALK
EXIS TIN
EXISTING RIW
`
CURVE TAN
-N RAO
Ay 1 14'03'52- 22
P Aitlkvy 2
wl
City of Moorpark Exhibit 2
Bid Results: Miller Parkway Widening (at Peach Hill Road) Page 1 of 2
[File # Bids: Miller-mod)
Bidder >>>>> Vendor 1 Vendor2
Bid Opening: Name: Engineer's Estimate Berry General Engineering Nye & Nelson
May 21, 2002 Address: P. O. Box 7178 1860 Eastman Ave. [ #108]
Cit, State: Oxnard, CA 93031 Ventura, CA 93003
Tel. No.: 805 -485 -9826 805 -654 -1682
Contact Person: Dan Berry Ruric Nye
Item Description Est Qty Units
Unit Cost
Total Bid
Unit Cost
Total Bid
Unit Cost
Total Bid
I Mobilization 1 LS
3,000.00
3,000.00
6,402.00
6,402.00
3,400.00
3,400.00
2 Clearing /Grubbing I LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
3,360.00
3,360.00
5,100.00
5,100.00
3 Unclassified Excavation I LS
1,000.00
1,000.00
11,475.00
1 1,475.00
10,300.00
10,300.00
4 Traffic Control I LS
2,000.00
2,000.00
3,085.00
3,085.00
6,608.00
6,608.00
5 A/C Pavement 47 Ton
120.00
5,640.00
67.15
3,156.05
96.00
4,512.00
6 Signs 2 EA
300.00
600.00
265.00
530.00
285.00
570.00
7 Base 100 CY
100.00
10,000.00
55.40
5,540.00
76.00
7,600.00
8 Curb Ramp I EA
2,500.00
2,500.00
436.00
436.00
800.00
800.00
9 Sidewalk 1,648 SF
4.00
6,59100
2.95
4,861.60
5.00
8,240.00
10 6" Curb & Gutter 206 LF
30.00
6,180.00
17.90
3,687.40
29.00
5,974.00
11 18" RCP 5 LF
500.00
2,500.00
173.00
865.00
220.00
1,100.00
12 Concrete Pipe Collar 1 EA
500.00
500.00
425.00
425.00
340.00
340.00
13 Catch Basin 1 EA
5,000.00
5,000.00
2,445.00
2,445.00
1,700.00
1,700.00
14 Local Depression 1 EA
1,500.00
1,500.00
425.00
425.00
400.00
400.00
15 Striping, Etc. 1 LS
3,000.00
3,000.00
2,908.00
2,908.00
7,000.00
7,000.00
16 Remove Curb & Gutter 222 LF
10.00
2,220.00
4.85
1,076.70
5.70
1,265.40
17 Remove Sidewalk 1,648 SF
2.00
3,296.00
0.85
1,400.80
1.15
1,895.20
18 Remove Curb Ramp 1 EA
1,000.00
1,000.00
72.00
72.00
170.00
170.00
19 Remove Signs 2 EA
100.00
200.00
13.60
27.20
90.00
180.00
20 Remove Catch Basin 1 EA
500.00
500.00
2,295.00
2,295.00
570.00
570.00
21 Relocate Tree I EA
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,325.00
2,325.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
22 Modify Traffic Signal I LS
35,000.00
35,000.00
30,774.00
30,774.00
33,000.00
33,000.00
23 Cap Existing Irrigation I 1 LS
5,000.00
5,000.00
265.00
265.00
570.00
570.00
24 Slope Grading / Landscr 1 LS
7000
7,000.00
13,630.00
13,630.00
15000
15,000.00
25 Release 1 LS
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Total
107,229.00
101,467.75
118,795.60
oorpark
Exhibit 2
ts: Miller Parkway Widening (at Peach
F
Hill Road)
Page 2 of2
ds: Miller mod]
Bidder » »>
Vendor 3
Vendor 4
Vendor 5
Bid Opening: Name:
J & H Engineering
E & M Constructors
Sub Zero Excavating
May 21, 2002 Address:
79 Daily Drive
[ #169]
15981 Yarnell
Street [ #198]
67 Erbs Road
Cit, State:
Camarillo,
CA 93010
Sylmar, CA
91342
Thousand Oaks,
CA 91362
Tel. No.:
805- 987 -8414
818-362-9811
805- 494 -5013
Contact Person:
Howard Janotta
Rito Padilla
Lisa Fletcher
ltem Description Est Qty nits
Unit Cost
Total Bid
Unit Cost
Total Bid
Unit Cost
Total Bid
I Mobilization 1 LS
7,500.00
7,500.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
2 Clearing / Grubbing 1 LS
7,500.00
7,500.00
23,471.00
23,471.00
5,800.00
5,800.00
3 Unclassified Excavation 1 LS
4,500.00
4,500.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
4 Traffic Control I LS
4,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
19,275.00
19,275.00
5 A/C Pavement 47 Ton
100.00
4,700.00
100.00
4,700.00
95.00
4,465.00
6 Signs 2 EA
225.00
450.00
250.00
500.00
287.50
575.00
7 Base 100 CY
36.00
3,600.00
90.00
9,000.00
33.00
3,300.00
8 Curb Ramp I EA
875.00
875.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
2,800.00
2,800.00
9 Sidewalk 1,648 SF
6.00
9,888.00
4.50
7,416.00
3.40
5,603.20
10 6" Curb & Gutter 206 LF
34.00
7,004.00
18.00
3,708.00
13.10
2,698.60
11 18" RCP 5 LF
300.00
1,500.00
200.00
1,000.00
60.00
300.00
12 Concrete Pipe Collar I EA
350.00
350.00
2,000.0000
2,000.00
500.00
500.00
13 Catch Basin I EA
2,850.00
2,850.00
7,149.00
7,149.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
14 Local Depression 1 EA
250.00
250.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
15 Striping, Etc. I LS
6,640.00
6,640.00
4,150.00
4,150.00
3,205.00
3,205.00
16 Remove Curb & Gutter 222 LF
7.00
1,554.00
12.00
2,664.00
6.50
1,443.00
17 Remove Sidewalk 1,648 SF
1.00
1,648.00
2.00
3,296.00
1.25
2,060.00
18 Remove Curb Ramp 1 < EA
500.00
500.00
750.00
750.00
690.00
690.00
19 Remove Signs 2 EA
92.00
184.00
100.00
200.00
115.00
230.00
20 Remove Catch Basin 1 EA
750.00
750.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
610.00
610.00
21 Relocate Tree 1 EA
500.00
500.00
300.00
300.00
2,503.50
2,503.50
22 Modify Traffic Signal I LS
33,166.00
33,166.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
39,929.41
39,929.41
23 Cap Existing Irrigation 1 1 LS
500.00
500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
575.00
575.00
24 Slope Grading 1 LS
28000
28,000.00
12,500.00
12,500.00
30179
30,179.00
25 Release I LS
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Total
128,410.00
135,305.00
140,242.71
Exhibit 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE FY 01/02
BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR PROJECT 8032 -
MILLER PARKWAY WIDENING [FUND 2002 - TRAFFIC
MITIGATION FUND]
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the
Budget for Fiscal Year 2001/02; and
WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City
Council requesting a budget increase in the aggregate amount of
$34,500; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof,
describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the
budget line item(s).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That a Budget amendment in the aggregate increase
of $34,500, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", is
hereby approved.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed
in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment:
Exhibit 'A': Appropriation and Budget Detail
Resolution No. 2002 -
Exhibit "A"
REVISED
APPROPRIATIONS & BUDGET FOR
Miller Parkway Widening Project
(Project No. 8032]
FUND
ACCOUNT NUMBER
APPROPRIATION REQUEST
L. A. Avenue AOC
2501.0000.0000.5500
$ 34,500
TOTALS: 1 1 $ 34,500 1
FY 01/02 BUDGET RE -CAP
ACCOUNT NUMBER
CURRENT
SUBJECT
REVISED
SUBJECT
APPROPRIATION
/ (REDUCTION)
FY 2001/02
APPROPRIATION
FY 2001/02
$
BUDGET
/ (REDUCTION)
BUDGET
2501.8310.8046.xxxx
$ 100,000
$ 34,500
$ 134,500
TOTALS:
$ 100,0001
$ 34,5001
$ 134,500
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
CURRENT
FY 01/02
BUDGET
SUBJECT
APPROPRIATION
/ (REDUCTION)
REVISED
FY 01/02
BUDGET
2002.8310.8032.9601:
Design
$
14,000
$ 0
$
14,000
2002.8310.8032.9610:
R -O -W
$
0
$ 500
$
500
2002.8310.8032.9640:
Const.
$
85,000
$ 32,000
$
117,000
250028310.8032.9650:
Insp.
$
1,000
$ 2,000
$
3,000
TOTALS:
$ 100,0001
$ 34,500
$
134,500
Approved as to form:
ITEM 1 I • CO •
[ACT t (")"{, ;
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council N""—
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 6 -5 -02)
SUBJECT: Consider Scope of Utility Relocation to be Undertaken as
a Part of the Realignment of Flinn Avenue [Project 80371
DISCUSSION
A. Background
In December of 2001 the City Council approved the conceptual
plan (Exhibit 1) for the subject project.
B. Project Scope
This project calls for the realignment of Flinn Avenue to
intersect Spring Road at Second Street. The scope of work will
include:
1. construction of a new street as shown on the conceptual plan
(Exhibit 1);
2. construction of additional pavement width on the east side
of Spring Road from the existing Flinn Avenue northerly to
the rail crossing;
[Note:The design for this street widening is being
prepared as part of the Spring Road widening
project (Project 8026), but will be incorporated
into the construction contract documents for the
subject Flinn Avenue realignment project.]
3. construction of a traffic signal at the new Spring Road /
Flinn Avenue / Second Street intersection;
4. utility relocation as directed.
C. Project Cost Estimate
The cost of the above described project is $437,000 [Design:
$52,000; Construction: $350,000; Inspection: $35,0001. This
cost estimate presumes no utility relocation.
Flinn utilities G
Flinn Avenue - Utility Relocation
May 24, 2002
Page 2
D. Police Services Facility
The City is working toward the construction of a new Police
Services facility, to be constructed on the vacant property
northeast of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue. One prerequisite of
the site development efforts for that project is the subject
road realignment project.
E. Interim Access for Properties Fronting Flinn Avenue
It is the intent of staff to proceed with the construction of
the project within the next few months. The construction
project will include the closure of the existing Flinn Avenue
at Spring Road. The properties on the south side of the
existing street will continue to use the existing Flinn Avenue
for access, but access will be restricted to eastbound only, to
connect to the new Flinn Avenue. It is the intent of staff to
negotiate revised access to these properties as a function of
discussions regarding the future vacation of the old street.
F. Street Vacation
A future phase of the project will be the efforts necessary to
vacate the existing Flinn Avenue. Said vacation will cause the
north one -half of the existing street to be conveyed to the
owner of the property on the north side of the existing street
(the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency [MRA]), and the south one -
half of the street to be conveyed to the owners of the
properties fronting the south side of the existing street. If
it is decided to leave any of the existing utilities in place,
utility easements, with related rights, will be prepared and
recorded prior to the vacation of the street. As stated above,
revised access to the properties on the south side of the "old"
street will be negotiated.
G. Remnant Parcel
As can be seen on the plan attached as Exhibit 1, a "remnant
parcel" will be created between the "old" street and the new
street. This remnant parcel will be owned by the MRA. The
ultimate use of that property has not yet been determined.
H. Utility Relocation
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a Utilities Plan showing the location
of the utilities located within the existing Flinn Avenue. Also
shown for discussion purposes only, is the possible location of
the gas line and electrical lines, should it be decided to
relocate either of those utilities.
Flinn utilities
Flinn Avenue - Utility Relocation
May 24, 2002
Page 3
Attached as Exhibit 3 is a chart summarizing the estimated cost
of relocating each of the affected utilities.
A discussion of each utility is as follows:
1. Electrical: The options are:
a) to leave the overhead power lines where they are (along
the south side of the street to be vacated to the south
side properties);
b) to relocate the poles and overhead wires to the new
street; or
c) to underground the electrical utility through the project
area.
The cost of undergrounding is estimated to be approximately
$100,000. For illustrative purposes only, the utility plan
(Exhibit 2) shows new electrical overhead lines relocated to
the new street.
2. Gas: Discussions are underway with the Gas Company regarding
whether or not they would prefer to have the gas line
relocated to the new street in order to be out of the way of
any future use of the vacated street. [This relocation is
shown on Exhibit 2 for illustrative purposes only.]
If it is the desire of the Gas Company to have the line
relocated, costs for same would be borne by them. If they
have no problem leaving the gas line where it is, the City
could relocate the line or widen the required utility
easement to include this existing facility. The cost of this
possible relocation is approximately $34,000.
3. Water: The estimated cost to relocate the water main is
approximately $68,000.
4. Sewer: The estimated cost to relocate the sewer main is
approximately $230,000.
5. Storm Drain: The estimated cost to relocate the storm drain
is approximately $128,000.
6. Telephone: There is a major telephone conduit system in
Flinn Avenue. There is no firm estimate of what it would
cost to relocate their conduits. Estimates for this work
could go up to $1 million.
7. Total Cost: As shown on the chart attached as Exhibit 3, the
cost of relocating all of the utilities could approach or
exceed $1.5 million.
Flinn—utilities
Flinn Avenue - Utility Relocation
May 24, 2002
Page 4
I. Conclusion
It is recommended that staff be directed to include in the
scope of work for the subject project, the undergrounding of
the electrical lines through the project area and that all
other utilities remain in place (unless relocated by others)
within utility easements to be granted prior to the vacation of
the street.
O. FYI: Grant
Staff has applied for a State Hazard Elimination Safety Program
[HES] grant, in the amount of $360,000, to partially fund this
project. The amount which may be approved is not yet known. It
is also not known when the State will render a determination
regarding grant recipients.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Direct staff to include the undergrounding of electrical
lines in the scope of work for the subject project, all other
utilities to remain in their current location unless
relocated at the sole expense of others.
2. Direct staff to prepare and record any required utility
easements prior to the vacation of existing Flinn Avenue.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Flinn utilities
Conceptual Plan
Utility Plan
Utility Relocation Costs
,0- 13- 2001(TUE) 12:24 HAWKS AND ASSOCIATES
80 c 80 160 v1t 9
SCALE OF FE E T
v
c
E T
-CIRVE �A711
dip
L-i '7 LE N
S E W F R
WATER
---------- TELEPHONE
I llllet=04=0� EXISTING GAS
3c", d 30r: 2D
POSSIBLE NEW GAS
ii I'! EXISTING ELECTRIC
POSSIBLE NEW F.I.E-CTRIC
PLAN
STORM DRAIN
CITY OF MOORPAR I
C- K "M AVE" m' L
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
X;._ UTLUTIES PLAN
Flinn Avenue Utility Relocation
Exhibit 3
Estimated Costs
Construction
Design
Construction
Construction
Contengency
Engineering
Engineering
Utility
Estimate
[15 %]
[10 %]
[10 %]
Total
Electrical
Overhead
$50,000
$7,500
$5,000
$5,000
$67,500
Add Undergrounding Costs
$25,000
$3,750
$2,500
$2,500
$33,750
$101,250
Gas
$25,000
$3,750
$2,500
$2,500
$33,750
Sub -Total
$135,000
Water
$50,000
$7,500
$5,000
$5,000
$67,500
Sewer
$170,000
$25,500
$17,000
$17,000
$229,500
Storm Drains
$95,000
$14,250
$9,500
$9,500
$128,250
Telephone
$600,000
$90,000
$60,000
$60,000
$810,000
Total
$1,015,000
$1,370,250
ITEM 11 . C>.
E: �' :SFr.• i °�.. ,_?. ` . 5A
ff
AC 7
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manage
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/5/02)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESCHEDULING OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING
ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARKING IN -LIEU FEE FOR THE
DOWNTOWN AREA
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting of May 15, 2002, City Council
directed staff to provide the required notices, and to advertise
a public hearing on June 5, 2002, for the establishment by
resolution of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area.
DISCUSSION
Staff was unable to provide adequate notice for a June 5, 2002,
Public Hearing that would meet the requirements of State law for
establishment of a new development fee. Therefore, in order to
meet the requirements of State law for noticing of new
development fees, the Public Hearing originally recommended for
June 5, 2002, must be rescheduled to the June 19, 2002, City
Council meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Reschedule the Public Hearing for establishment of a Parking In-
Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area from June 5, 2002, to June 19,
2002.
�4
I'I`EM
l.E .
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Direct o
DATE: May 23, 2002 (City Council Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
BACKGROUND
Community Development Law allows Redevelopment Agencies to
borrow funds from the City in support of the Agency's mission
and goals. Several times since the creation of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency, the City has loaned funds to the Agency
for specific purposes. All loans have been repaid, or will be
repaid by June 30, 2002.
DISCUSSION
In the coming year, the Agency has budgeted approximately $4.9
million in expenditures, including $2.9 million for capital
improvements. While the Agency's annual revenues and existing
fund balances are sufficient to finance these expenditures, it
is our practice for all expenditures to be paid by the City,
then these "advances" are repaid by the Agency. This is a
common practice intended to comply with state laws that require
Redevelopment Agencies to incur debt.
Staff is recommending a loan from the City to the Agency in the
amount of $5,000,000 as an advance for anticipated operating and
capital expenditures for the coming year. The Agency would be
charged a rate equal to the rate earned on investments (the
"LAIF" rate) plus 1 %; currently this would be approximately 4 %.
The loan would be provided by the City General Fund, which
currently has sufficient cash available, and would be due no
later than or June 30, 2003.
Honorable City Council
May 23, 2002
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote)
Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , approving a Loan Agreement with
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency.
Attachment: Resolution No. 2002 -
Loan Agreement
RESOLUTION 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LOAN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND
THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark has agreed to advance funds
to the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency in accordance with the
terms of a Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency has agreed to
accept the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement dated July
1, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency dated July 1, 2002, and
attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution, is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
01 1 r°
LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS LOAN AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of July, 2002,
by and between the City of Moorpark ( "City ") and the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Agency was created by Ordinance 87, adopted by
the City Council on March 18, 1987, for the purpose of
eliminating blighted conditions within specified project areas;
and
WHEREAS, in support of its mission, the Agency is
developing and implementing plans to acquire and construct
certain public facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that, in order to
undertake this redevelopment project, temporary financial
assistance in the form of a loan is required from the City of
Moorpark; and
WHEREAS, Section 33600 et. seq. of the California Community
Redevelopment Law authorizes the Agency to borrow money or
accept financial or other assistance from the City.
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND AGENCY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Amount and Use of Loan. The City, from its
General Fund, will advance to the Agency the amount of
$5,000,000 (five million dollars). Agency agrees to use such
loan proceeds only for those purposes set forth in the Health
and Safety Code and approved by the Agency.
SECTION 2. Repayment of Funds. The Agency will repay this
loan, both principal and interest, in full on or before June 30,
2003, unless extended by amendment to this Agreement.
SECTION 3. Interest Payment. This loan will bear interest
at a rate equivalent to the rate earned by City investments in
the Local Agency Investment Fund, plus one percent.
SECTION 4. Obligation Constitutes Indebtedness. This loan
agreement shall constitute an obligation and debt of the Agency
to use all available increment revenue to repay the City. Such
Loan Agreement, Page 2
July 1, 2002
indebtedness shall be subordinate to any and all other Agency
indebtedness incurred by the Agency, including indebtedness
incurred through the issuance of tax allocation notes or bonds
or any other bonds of the Agency.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Patrick Hunter, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Agency Secretary
CITY OF MOORPARK
Steven Kueny, City Manager
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
City Clerk
ITEM 1161:0
LA
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council R
FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Direct
DATE: May 23, 2002 (Council Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Establishing the Appropriation
Limitation for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 for the City of
Moorpark at $14,627,654.
BACKGROUND
Proposition 4 was approved by the voters of California in 1979
adding Article XIII B to the State Constitution. The
Proposition places a limit on the growth of general fund
appropriations by government entities.
DISCUSSION
Proposition 4 (the "Gann Limitations ") was adopted by California
voters in November 1979 and added Article XIII B to the State
Constitution. The Proposition limited the growth in
appropriations of state and local governments to the increase in
the jurisdiction's population and the increase in the State
price index. For FY 2001 -2002 the limitation was $14,219,997.
The information provided by the State Department of Finance, as
required by the Government Code, indicated a -1.27% change in
price index and a 4.19% change in population. Accordingly, the
City of Moorpark's limitation for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 is
$14,627,654. General Fund appropriations which are subject to
this limitation (some appropriations are exempt) for FY 2002-
2003 are estimated to be $6,081,500, well below this amount.
Honorable City Council
May 23, 2002
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
Attached: Resolution No. 2002-
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 -2003
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the State Constitution limits
annual appropriations for certain general fund revenues for
state and local governments; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 7910 requires that a city
establish its annual appropriations limitation by resolution at
a public meeting of the legislative body; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 appropriations
limitation has been calculated in accordance with the State
Constitution and applicable sections of the Government Code by
adjusting its Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 appropriations limit of
$14,219,997 by a cost index change of -1.27% and a population
change of 4.19% as determined by the California Department of
Finance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The appropriations limitation for the City of
Moorpark during Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 is hereby determined to be
$14,627,654.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
I'T'EM 11. (r.
a
_ r -
r
AC
BY: _ . _ - _ b� ..
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 13, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider One -Year Extension of Sunridge Landscape
Maintenance and the Venco Western Agreements
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to approve a one -year
extension to the City's Landscape Maintenance Agreements
with Sunridge Landscape Maintenance Services, Inc. and
Venco Western, Inc., at the current contract rate. The
Agreements expire on June 30, 2002, but each includes two,
one -year extension provisions which can be implemented at
the Council's discretion. If approved, this would be the
second one -year extension.
BACKGROUND
Sunridge Landscape Maintenance Services has provided
landscape maintenance services to the City since 1988. In
1996, the City solicited bid proposals for citywide
landscape services, and a three -year agreement was awarded
to Sunridge as the low, qualified bidder. In June, 2000,
the City entered into a new contract with Sunridge
Landscape Services. That contract expires on June 30, 2002,
and contains a provision for two, one -year extensions at
the City's discretion.
The City's current Agreement with Sunridge covers
maintenance of all City landscaped areas in parks, parkways
and medians, and other miscellaneous properties including,
but not limited to, the Metrolink Station, Public Works
Office, Parks and Public Works Yard Office, Building and
Safety, and the rental house at 661 Moorpark Avenue,
\\ mor_ pri_ sery \hcme_folders \MLindley \Landscp Zones\ Landscape maint agr
ext ccagd 2002.doc
Landscape Maintenance Agreements
Page 2
excluding Zone 12 of AD 84 -2. Additionally, the Agreement
requires Sunridge to open, clean and stock park restrooms;
open the access road gates at AVCP; and open all of the
City's tennis courts Monday through Friday.
Sunridge has carried out its contract obligations in a more
than satisfactory manner, and has demonstrated, on numerous
occasions a willingness to assist the City by performing
beyond its contractual obligation when requested by the
City. Most often, Sunridge's non - contractual assistance has
been at no cost to the City. Sunridge has agreed to the
proposed one -year extension at its current rate, without a
cost of living adjustment.
It is proposed that the one -year extension include an
additional landscaped area: Lighting Maintenance Assessment
District No. AD 01 -1 (Wilshire). The monthly cost to
maintain the landscaping in No. AD 01 -1 is $60.
In July, 2000, the City awarded a contract to Venco Western
Inc., for Zone 12, of AD 84 -2, after determining that it
was the lowest responsive bidder to the City's Request for
Proposals (RFP) . The term of the Agreement expires on June
30, 2002 and also contains a provision for two, one -year
extensions at the City's discretion. Venco has been
performing landscape maintenance services for the City in a
satisfactory manner. Additionally, Venco has agreed to
extend the Agreement for one year at the existing rate.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to extend the City's Agreements with
Sunridge Landscape Services and Venco Western through June
30, 2003, at the existing contractual rate.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM I I a H 0
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services rJ
DATE: May 13, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider One -Year Extension of the City's Tree
Maintenance Agreement with West Coast Arborist
DISCUSSION
The City Council is being asked to approve a one -year extension
to the City's Tree Maintenance Agreement with West Coast
Arborist (WCA) . The existing Agreement expires on June 30, 2002,
but it contains a provision for three one -year extensions. The
City has used one of the one -year extensions (June 30, 2001). If
approved, the Agreement with WCA would be extended through June
30, 2003, with no contract cost increase.
To date, WCA's performance has been good. They have responded
quickly and courteously to staff and resident inquires and
requests for corrections. As required by the agreement, they
previously prepared a City -wide tree inventory of all City
maintained trees. The data is kept current by both WCA and City
staff on a monthly basis.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to extend the City's tree maintenance agreement
with West Coast Arborist through June 30, 2003, with existing
service fees.
\\ mor_pri_ scrv\home_folders\MLindley \Landscp Zones \west coast contract ext 2 ccagd.doc
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
1
ITEM 11 • Z .
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Servicesl�'(J /� /
DATE: May 14, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing Recordation of the Notice of
Completion for Apricot Room Repairs
DISCUSSION
On February 20, 2002, the City Council confirmed the City
Manager's approval of an Agreement with Alan Bornstein
Construction, Inc., at a cost of $134,220 to repair the
roof and ceiling of the Community Center Apricot Room. The
City's insurance will cover the entire cost of the project,
less a $5,000 deductible.
The repairs have been completed and the Council is being
asked to authorize the recordation of the Notice of
Completion. The project was constructed and completed
pursuant to the approved plans and specifications, less
"minor punch" list items. There were two approved Change
Orders, summarized as follows:
Change Order #1 (No Cost): Use torch -down roof in
place of rock roof.
Change Order #2 (Cost - $4,900): Unforeseen drywall
repairs, painting, new top set base, and floor
repairs.
Total Project Cost - $139,120
The additional work, in the amount of $4,900, was approved
by the City's insurance representative. As a result, there
is no additional "out of pocket" cost to the City.
Apricot Room Notice of Completion
Page 2
With the Council's authorization to record the Notice of
Completion, the contractor will receive the balance of
payment due 35 days after the recordation and fulfillment
of all contractual obligations as determined by the City.
STAFF RECOMENDATION
Accept the work as complete; authorize the City Clerk to
file the Notice of Completion for the project; and
authorize the release of the balance of payment, due upon
satisfactory clearance and thirty -five (35) days after
Notice of Completion records and completion of close -out
contractual obligations on the part of the contractor.
\\mor _pri_serv\ home_ folders \MLindley \Facilities\Apricot Rm RooflNotice of Completion ccagd.doc