The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG RPTS 2002 0515 CC REGResolution No. 2002 -1972 Ordinance No. 282 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2002 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Paul Hatfield, Cornerstone Community Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 4. ROLL CALL: 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation Acknowledging Public Works Week as May 19 through May 25, 2002. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. City Council Agenda May 15, 2002 Page 2 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: (continued) B. Introduction of New Employee, Barry Hogan, Community Development Director. C. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon Team and Coaches. D. City Manager's Monthly Report. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY) 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Proposed Operating and Capital Improvements Budgets for the Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff Recommendation: Set budget workshop for May 22 or May 29, 2002. B. Consider Scheduling of the Summer Meeting Recess. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to post a notice of meeting cancellation for the July 3 and August 7, 2002, regular meetings. C. Consider Engineer's Report for Landscaping and Lightin Maintenance Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff Recommendations: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving the Engineer's Report and setting June 5, 2002, as the date of a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for FY 2002/2003; 2) Direct staff to initiate efforts necessary for the City Council to consider formation of a new Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District which, if approved, would become effective for FY 03/04. City Council Agenda May 15, 2002 Page 3 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued) D. Consider Establishment of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the concept of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area as described in the agenda report; and 2) Direct staff to provide the required notices, and to advertise a public hearing on June 5, 2002, for the establishment by resolution of a Parking In -lieu Fee for the Downtown Area. E. Consider City Co- sponsorship of the Moorpark Rotary Club's Civil War Reenactment. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - May 15, 2002. Manual Warrants Voided Warrants Payroll Liability Warrants 109239 - 109251 109243 - 109244 & 109358 109379 - 109386 $ 33,369.82 $ - 0 - $ 11,450.89 Regular Warrants 109252 - 109354 & $ 26,924.30 109355 - 109378 $976,657.15 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. B. Consider Second Addendum to Memorandum of Aareement (MOA) with Service Employees International Union AFL - CIO, CLC Local 998 Pertaining to July 3 or July 5 and December 31 Holidays. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to approve the Second Addendum to the MOA with the final language to be approved by the City Manager. City Council Agenda May 15, 2002 Page 4 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) C. Consider Park Rental Fee Waiver for Ventura Count Special Olympics. Staff Recommendation: Approve Ventura County Special Olympics' request for a park rental fee waiver. D. Consider Quarterly Treasurer's Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file Quarterly Treasurer's Report. E. Consider Authorizing Recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Construction of the Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP) Phase II Restroom Utility Project. Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept the work as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the project; 2) Authorize the release of the balance of payment, due upon satisfactory clearance and thirty -five (35) days after Notice of Completion records and completion of close- out contractual obligations on the part of the contractor. F. Consider Purchase of Microsoft Office Upgrades for All Users. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , amending the 2001/2002 fiscal year budget to provide $18,000 for the purchase of software upgrades. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) G. Consider a Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2001- 1918 and Adopting Revised Engineering Policies and Standards to Add Provisions Pertaining to 1) Traffic Index; 2) Use of Steel Plates; and 3) Advance Street Name Signs. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- H. Right -of -Way Acquisition for Los Angeles Avenue Widening Projects. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of -way and related property rights required to construct the projects described in this agenda report. City Council Agenda May 15, 2002 Page 5 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) I. Consider Upgrade of Secretary I Position in Assistant City Manager's Office and Modification to Salary Plan. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve upgrade of Secretary I to Secretary II position in Assistant City Manager's Office effective May 17, 2002; and 2) Direct staff to return with Salary Plan Resolution changes for the June 5 meeting. 12. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance 280, an Ordinance Amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" Related to Site Development Standards in the Sub - Regional Retail/ Commercial and Business Park Zones of the Carlsberg Specific Plan. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 280 read for the second time and adopted as read. B. Consider Ordinance 281, an Ordinance Approving Zone Change (ZC) No. 2001 -01 to Change the Zoning Designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential) To RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 Dwelling Units /Acre on One Parcel (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) Totaling Approximately 2.44 Gross Acres of Land Located on the Northeast Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street, on the Application of Colmer Development Company. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 281 read for the second time and adopted as read. 13. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) City Council Agenda May 15, 2002 Page 6 13. CLOSED SESSION: (continued) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) E. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative Services, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, and Director of Public Works. F. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998 G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Unrepresented employees: Assistant City Manager, Director of Administrative Services, ATCM /City Clerk, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, Director of Public Works, Finance /Accounting Manager, Accountant I, Budget and Finance Manager, Information Systems Supervisor, Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Recreation Superintendent, and Senior Management Analyst. 14. ADJOURNMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II). MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 1 i{ T 1 ul �-T FL 5�71fcZ . 1 F TL` BE -1't )T1)'1 cl C.1.::) BY: C'`_ _ TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager DATE: May 3, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5 -15 -2002) SUBJECT: Consider Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 The City Manager's recommended budgets for the City of Moorpark and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency for fiscal year 2001/2002 will be presented to the City Council for its consideration on May 15, 2002. It is recommended that the City Council receive the recommended Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for fiscal year 2002/2003 and set a date for a budget workshop. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set budget workshop for May 22 or May 29. I ,t. .n. TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council ITEM 0,1 g • (N v r��__� lG�Cc.� 1 ,L% B Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City Clerk D57 May 8, 2001 (CC Meeting of 5/15/02) SUBJECT: Consider Scheduling of the Summer Meeting Recess BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Staff is requesting that the City Council determine the summer 2002 recess schedule. Staff is recommending cancellation of the July 3 and August 7 meetings. The regular meetings on July 17 and August 21 are not proposed to be cancelled. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to post a notice of meeting cancellation for the July 3 and August 7, 2002 regular meetings. ITEM -1040 CI J .J Cci} �E �,n vri ✓yi F .r1 cl - , O �-� <y �;' /�► = cam: E SC` ;,2 or 2 MOORPARK CITY COUNC I Iii,: �- AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council ^�11 FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works /r DATE: May 6, 2002 (CC Meeting 5- 15 -02) SUBJECT: Engineer's Report for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for the City's Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts and setting the date of a public hearing to consider the levy of the assessments for said Districts for FY 2002/03. nTSC'i74 ,qTnN A. Background In 1984, a Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (AD 84 -2) was created to fund costs associated with Citywide street lighting and Landscape maintenance. This was a successor to the District enacted by the County of Ventura prior to the incorporation of the City. In 2001, three (3) new Landscaping & Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts (AD01 -1, AD01 -2 & AD01 -3) were formed at the request of the owner / developer of the affected properties. B. Citywide Lighting & Landscaping Assessment District AD84 -2 provides for the levy of an assessment upon all of the parcels in the City, to fund street lighting energy and maintenance costs. There is also a separate assessment to fund maintenance and improvement costs for certain designated parkways and medians. In addition, a number AD_LL_02- 3_report Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts Engineer's Report May 6, 2002 Page 2 of Zones of Benefit have been established which levy an additional assessment upon the lots within those Zones, to fund the maintenance and improvement of certain designated landscaping within or adjacent to those Zones. These assessments are proposed to be levied again for FY 2002/03. C. Other Districts In addition, certain other assessment districts have been established to fund maintenance and /or improvements within or adjacent to certain specific areas. For ease of identification, these districts have been renamed in the subject Engineer's Report, as follows: • AD01 -1 (Wilshire Builders): District 14 • AD01 -2 (Toll Bothers): District 15 and • AD01 -3 (Cabrillo): District 16. D. Combined Report The attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 1) addresses all of the above mentioned Assessment Districts. E. Annual Review As part of the annual budget process, the City Council considers whether or not to renew the subject Assessment Districts and levy assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. In preparation for that consideration, it is necessary to prepare an Engineer's Report setting forth certain relevant information pertaining to such an action. On February 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002 -1944 directing the preparation of that Engineer's Report. F. Improvements to be Maintained The improvements and maintenance funded by the Assessment Districts is generally described as follows: • Citywide District: a. Street Lighting: Street lighting energy and maintenance costs. b. Landscape Maintenance: The maintenance of certain designated parkways and medians. c. Zones of Benefit: 1 Pecan Avenue [T -2851] AD84_02- 3_report lf� ^ ^ C V a v v L Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts Engineer's Report May 6, 2002 Page 3 2 Steeple Hill Area [T -2865] ► Landscape Maintenance ► Drainage Maintenance ► Tierra Rejada Road Parkway Improvement 3 Buttercreek /Peppermill [T -3032] 4 Williams Ranch Rd [T -3274] 5 Pheasant Run Area [T -3019 & T -35251 ► Landscape Maintenance ► Drainage Maintenance 6 Inglewood St. [T -3306] 7 Moorpark Business Park (L. A. Ave & Gabbert) 8 Home Acres Buffer 9 Moorpark Industrial Park (Condor Drive) 10 Mountain Meadows (PC -3) ► Landscape Maintenance ► Drainage Maintenance 11 Alyssas Ct. [T -4174] 12 Carlsberg Specific Plan Area 13 Unassigned • Other Districts 14 Wilshire Builders [T -5201] 15 Toll Brothers [T -4928] 16 Cabrillo [T -5161] ► Landscape Maintenance ► Drainage Maintenance G. Method of Assessment The method used to establish the assessment amounts is set forth in the Engineer's Report. This method (benefit spread formula, etc.) is unchanged from prior years. H. FY 2002/03 Assessment Amounts The assessment the Engineer's Description amounts proposed for Report are summarized FY02 /03, as set forth in as follows: Landscape Maint. Total Assessment Assmnt ($) ' Number! Amnt Street Lighting ._.._ ._.. _ _ . _ ._. 215,762 i ;Citywide Landscaping 160,398 Sub Total _..... .... _ ,, ......... 376,160 . r. 1 Tract 2852 _...... 9, 702 '._...... _ 75 2: Tract 2865 73,839:_ 574 3: Tract 3032 _. 3,079 „265 4 Tract 3274 61383 129,_ 5 Tracts 3019/3025 23,840' 142 AD84_02- 3_report 20 84 13.18 34 02 129.36: 116.46: 11.62 49.48: 107.56' 48 145.64 75 114.22 C n r- ti v Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts Engineer's Report May 6, 2002 Page 4 A = per acre ** Plus Assessment on Golf Course Property I. Cost of Living Adjustment Pursuant to language set forth in the formation documents for Zone 12 and District Nos. 14, 15 and 16, these annual assessment may be increased annually, in accordance with a specific formula, to cover cost -of- living increases. The assessments for these Zones / Districts set forth in the Engineer's Report, include that COLA adjustments. J. Improvement Reserve Ceiling This year's Engineer's Report provides for the establishment of a Capital Reserve Account for each Zone or District. The Report also provides that should it be projected that the Capital Reserve Account for any Zone or District will exceed an amount equal to three (3) times the annual operating budget for that Zone or District, the amount of the assessment shall remain unchanged but the amount of that assessment to be levied upon the affected properties shall be reduced to an amount determined by the Assessment Engineer to be sufficient to fund the program for the next year. The projected year -end Capital Reserve Fund Balance for Zone 11 will exceed the above mentioned ceiling. Accordingly, the amount to be levied upon each parcel within Zone 11 ($33.76) will be less than the per lot assessment amount ($337.78). AD84_02- 3_report .......... _ _ . _ . __...... _ _. Landscape & Landscape Maint. Drainage Maint. Total Assessment Assessment Description Assmnt ($) Number Amnt ($) Number Amnt (_$) 6: Tract 3306 _ ......_. .._ .. 924 22 42.00 7 L A @ Gabbert 11,298 91.74 A 123.15, _.8:_ Buffer- City. 7,669 498 15.40 ... Buffer -Home Acres 7 574 c........... :........... 201 ........ 37.68 9: Condor Drive 1,356 _ .... 49.44 A 27.43 _._. 10: Mt Meadows S P . ..._. _ ....._.. 200,529 1,775 76 54 ............. 669 87.38 ...____ _. 11: Tract 4174 ....._.._ 304 9 33.76 _12. Carlsberg ..._._._ 235,225 _..536.:. 408.94 _._ ..... 13 Unassigned 14 Wilshire _ 1,205 !_. _ . 120 48 15: Toll Bros. 629111IT11111 216 * *1,452.56 16: Cabrillo 10,576 0! 0 59 179.28 Total 1,443,029 A = per acre ** Plus Assessment on Golf Course Property I. Cost of Living Adjustment Pursuant to language set forth in the formation documents for Zone 12 and District Nos. 14, 15 and 16, these annual assessment may be increased annually, in accordance with a specific formula, to cover cost -of- living increases. The assessments for these Zones / Districts set forth in the Engineer's Report, include that COLA adjustments. J. Improvement Reserve Ceiling This year's Engineer's Report provides for the establishment of a Capital Reserve Account for each Zone or District. The Report also provides that should it be projected that the Capital Reserve Account for any Zone or District will exceed an amount equal to three (3) times the annual operating budget for that Zone or District, the amount of the assessment shall remain unchanged but the amount of that assessment to be levied upon the affected properties shall be reduced to an amount determined by the Assessment Engineer to be sufficient to fund the program for the next year. The projected year -end Capital Reserve Fund Balance for Zone 11 will exceed the above mentioned ceiling. Accordingly, the amount to be levied upon each parcel within Zone 11 ($33.76) will be less than the per lot assessment amount ($337.78). AD84_02- 3_report Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts Engineer's Report May 6, 2002 Page 5 K. Assessment Amounts Unchanged Accepted as noted above, the assessment amounts set forth in the subject Engineer's Report are the same as the assessments levied last year. Any action to otherwise increase these assessments may not be taken without first seeking approval of such an increase via a mail ballot prepared and processed in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218. L. Fund Deficits Attached as Exhibit 2 are charts showing fund activity for all Assessment Districts for FY99 /00 through FY02 /03. Page 4 of the exhibit shows the fund activity for FY02 /03. A number of Funds are projected to show a future deficit. Certain of those Funds are listed as follows: Description Lighting Citywide Landscaping Zone 5 - T3019 / T3525 Zone 7 - L A Ave / Maureen Zone 9 - L A Ave / Condor Total Beginning Balance Revenue ($38,944.00) $215,762.00 $84,590.00 $160,398.00 ($28,497.00) $23,340.00 ($3,066.00) $11,298.00 ($857.00) $1,350.00 $13,226.00 $412,148.00 Note: The projected aggregate year -end Fund Balance for AD84 -2 is $555,094. Discussion of some of the above cited deficits, is as follows: 1. Street Lighting: There have been increases to electrical energy costs in recent years. The cost of street lighting has, therefore, increased, causing expenses to exceed assessment district revenues. 2. Citywide Landscaping: Expenses have increased for this program due to the addition of new landscaped areas and increased costs related to tree trimming. Although this Fund is not yet showing a projected deficit, expenses now exceed revenues and the Fund is projected to show a deficit next year. 3. Zone 5 - T3019 / T3525: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. 4. Zone 7 - Parkway: North Side Los Angeles Avenue, East of Gabbert Road: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. 5. Zone 9 - Parkway: Los Angeles Avenue at Condor Drive: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. AD64 02 -3 report ., FY02 /03 Expenses Enging Bal. $250,000.00 ($73,182.00) $218,798.00 $26,190.00 $46,300.00 ($51,457.00) $13,770.00 ($5,538.00) $2,335.00 ($1,842.00) $531,203.00 ($105,829.00) Note: The projected aggregate year -end Fund Balance for AD84 -2 is $555,094. Discussion of some of the above cited deficits, is as follows: 1. Street Lighting: There have been increases to electrical energy costs in recent years. The cost of street lighting has, therefore, increased, causing expenses to exceed assessment district revenues. 2. Citywide Landscaping: Expenses have increased for this program due to the addition of new landscaped areas and increased costs related to tree trimming. Although this Fund is not yet showing a projected deficit, expenses now exceed revenues and the Fund is projected to show a deficit next year. 3. Zone 5 - T3019 / T3525: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. 4. Zone 7 - Parkway: North Side Los Angeles Avenue, East of Gabbert Road: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. 5. Zone 9 - Parkway: Los Angeles Avenue at Condor Drive: In recent years, expenses have exceeded assessment revenues. AD64 02 -3 report ., Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts Engineer's Report May 6, 2002 Page 6 Note: The deficit shown for the Zone 2 improvements [$7,717] was created when the Tierra Rejada Parkway project was constructed. That deficit will be recovered from future year improvement assessments. In the view of staff, action should be taken to eliminate these Fund deficits. In that regard options include: • The transfer funds from the Gas Tax Fund or the General Fund to each of these Funds, sufficient to eliminate the deficits; and • Evaluation of the need and necessity for the formation of a new Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (discussed below) to fund these surplus costs. M. New Citvwide Assessment District It is recommended below, that staff be directed to initiate efforts necessary to form a new Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District, effective FY 03/04, to fund the shortfall in revenues discussed above. Pursuant to Proposition 218, such a district formation would require a Mail Ballot to be sent to all property owners in the City. N. Resolution Attached as Exhibit 3 is a Resolution approving the subject Engineer's Report and setting June 5, 2002, as the date of a public hearing to consider the levy of the assessments for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2002/03. This resolution will also serve as the public hearing notice for the June 5th public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving the Engineer's Report and setting June 5, 2002, as the date of a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for FY 2002/03. 2. Direct staff to initiate efforts necessary for the City Council to consider formation of a new Citywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District which, if approved, would become effective for FY03 /04. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: AD84_02- 3_report Engineer's Report Fund Activity Resolution Ci 111 � V Exhibit l: Engineer's Report The Engineer's Report has been distributed by separate Memo to the City Council and key staff. Copies of the Engineer's Report may be obtained from the City Clerks office. C� C� �a Landscape I Lighting Page 1 of 4 Assessment Districts [File: adfunds 02 031 Fund Activity: FY99100 51612002 Revenue Beginning Rev. Total Exp. Total Available Less Ending Fund Description Balance Code 3100 Assmnt 208,131 Misc 7,001 Interest 5,852 Revenue Code 8901 Expenses 225,324 less Expenses Reserve Balance 0 2300 Lighting 11,659 220,984 7,319 (7,319) Landscaping 100,320 3102 148,761 4,183 152,944 7901 133,232 120,032 (120,032) 0 111,979 373,928 127,351 (127,351) 0 356,892 7,001 10,035 358,556 2301 Zone 1 2,035 3102 9,653 249 9,902 7901 4,877 7,060 (7,060) 0 2302 Zone 2: LIS 28,466 3102 65,902 3,699 69,601 7901 45,750 52,317 (52,317) 0 Zone 2: Drains 1,514 3103 1,400 1,400 8902 185 2,729 (2,729) 0 Zone 2: Improvements 22,232 3101 6,220 6,220 8019 0 28,452 28,452 52,212 77,221 83,498 (55,046) 28,452 73,522 0 3,699 45,935 Prior Year Encumberance 5,000 5,000 5,000 57,212 45,935 88,498 (55,046) 33,452 2303 Zone 3 648 3102 3,063 57 3,120 7901 2,464 1,304 (1,304) 0 2304 Zone 4 (3,583) 3102 6,350 0 6,350 7901 4,470 (1,703) (1,703) 2305 Zone 5: LIS 4,930 3102 23,219 262 23,481 7901 24,898 3,513 (3,513) 0 Zone 5: Drains 647 3103 497 0 497 8902 160 984 (984) 0 5,577 23,716 0 262 23,978 25,058 4,497 (4,497) 0 2306 Zone 6 886 3102 919 52 971 7901 786 1,071 (1,071) 0 2307 Zone 7 933 3102 11,142 92 11,234 7901 9,831 2,336 (2,336) 0 2308 Zone 8 1,772 3102 15,073 210 15,283 7901 11,121 5,934 (5,934) 0 2309 Zone 9 1,634 3102 1,343 84 1,427 7901 1,875 1,186 (1,186) 0 2310 Zone 10: LIS 103,615 3102 195,812 6,682 202,494 7901 175,710 130,399 (130,399) 0 Zone 10: Drains 6,919 3103 7,214 7,214 8902 2,500 11,633 (11,633) 0 110,534 203,026 0 6,682 209,708 178,210 142,032 (142,032) 0 2311 Zone it 550 3102 3,024 99 3,123 7901 1,091 2,582 (2,582) 0 2312 Zone 12 0 3102 0 2 2 7901 280 (278) (278) 2313 Zone 13 6,329 3102 281 281 7901 1,180 5,430 5,430 Sub -Total AD 84.2 291,506 707,723 7,001 21,804 736,528 645,734 382,300 (350,399) 31,901 2314 A001.1 Wilshire Builders 0 3102 0 7901 1,884 (1,884) (1,884) 2315 A001 -2 Tall Bros 0 3102 0 7901 126 (126) (126) 2316 ADO 1 -3 Cabrillo 0 3102 0 7901 0 0 0 Total [61 1 291,506 1 707,723 7,001 21,804 1 736,528 1 647,744 1 380,290 (350,399) 1 29,891 Note A: To be adjusted in FYO1102 Note B: Does not include Prior Year Encumberance [$5,0001 from Fund 2302 (j c� Exhibit 2 Landscape I Lighting Page 2 of 4 Assessment Districts [File: adfunds 02 031 Fund Activity: FY00101 51612002 Revenue Beginning Rev. Total Exp. Total Available Less Ending Fund Description Balance Code 3100 Assmnt 208,886 Misc 1,080 Interest Revenue Code 8901 Expenses 228,361 Less Expenses Reserve Balance (11,076) 2300 lighting 7,319 209,966 (11,076) Landscaping 120,032 3102 145,391 26,875 9,721 181,987 7901 175,500 126,519 (126,519) 0 127,351 391,953 115,443 (126,519) (11,076) 354,277 27,955 9,721 403,861 2301 Zone 1 7,060 3102 9,657 597 10,254 7901 7,815 9,499 (9,499) 0 2302 Zone 2: LIS 52,317 3102 69,257 5,657 74,914 7901 54,692 72,539 (72,539) 0 Zone 2: Drains 2,729 3103 652 652 8902 A 3,381 13,381) 0 Zone 2: Improvements 28,452 3101 3,563 A 3,563 8019 3,543 28,472 0 28,472 83,498 79,129 104,392 (75,920) 28,472 73,472 0 5,657 58,235 Prior Year Encumberance 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 88,498 58,235 109,392 (75,920) 33,472 2303 Zone 3 1,304 3102 3,064 93 3,157 7901 2,738 1,723 (1,723) 0 2304 Zone 4 (1,704) 3102 6,353 39 6,392 7901 5,375 (687) (687) 2305 Zone 5: LIS 3,513 3102 23,237 173 23,410 7901 40,519 (13,596) (13,596) Zone 5: Drains 984 3103 489 489 8902 A 1,473 (1,473) 0 4,497 23,726 0 173 23,899 40,519 (12,123) (1,473) (13,596) 2306 Zone 6 1,071 3102 920 95 1,015 7901 884 1,202 1,202 2307 Zone 7 2,336 3102 11,147 118 11,265 7901 13,861 (260) (260) 2308 Zone 8 5,934 3102 15,080 445 15,525 7901 13,349 8,110 (8,110) 0 2309 Zone 9 1,186 3102 1,344 68 1,412 7901 2,605 (7) (7) 2310 Zone 10: LIS 130,399 3102 193,857 8,789 202,646 7901 231,589 101,456 (101,456) 0 Zone 10: Drains 11,633 3103 7,098 7,098 8902 679 18,052 (18,052) 0 142,032 200,955 0 8,789 209,744 232,268 119,508 (119,508) 0 2311 Zone 11 2,582 3102 3,025 217 3,242 7901 950 4,874 (4,874) 0 2312 Zone 12 (278) 3102 228,884 4,752 233,636 7901 68,020 165,338 (165,338) 0 2313 Zone 13 5,430 3102 322 322 7901 5,752 (5,752) 0 Sub -Total AD 84.2 931,904 27,955 31,086 850,480 382,299 990,945 522,764 (518,716) 4,048 2314 AD01 -1 Wilshire Builders (1,884) 3102 5,000 47 5,047 7901 3,613 (450) (450) 2315 ADO 1 -2 Toll Bros (126) 3102 5,000 49 5,049 7901 3,664 1,259 (1,259) 0 2316 ADO 1.3 Cabrillo 0 3102 5,000 0 5,000 7901 3,588 1,412 (1,412) 0 Total [B1 931,904 42,955 31,182 380,289 1,006,041 861,345 524,985 (521,387) 3,598 Note A: To be adjusted in FY01102 Note B: Does not include Prior Year Encumberance [$5,0001 from Fund 2302 C7 t� Landscape I Lighting Assessment Districts Fund Activity: FYO1102 Total Note A: Correction to FY00101 529,985 1 1,438,406 (3,189) 40,900 1 1,476,117 1 941,289 1 1,064,813 Page 3 e14 [File: adlunds 02 031 51612002 Less Ending Reserve Balance (38,944) 84,590 0 45,646 15,627 80,656 2,841 0 (13,947) 0 69,550 2,026 248 (28,497) 1,969 0 (26,528) 986 (3,066) 8,810 (857) 111,244 24,004 0 1 135,248 7,008 317,174 5,852 0 577,724 304 474,613 4,672 _ 7,500 0 12,172 0 1 1,064,813 Revenue Beginning Rev. Total Exp. Total Available Fund Description Balance Code 3100 Assmnt 217,132 Misc Interest Revenue Code 8901 Expenses 245,000 Less Expenses 2300 Lighting (11,076) 217,132 (38,944) Landscaping 126,519 3102 159,803 5,500 165,303 7901 207,232 84,590 115,443 382,435 45,646 376,935 0 5,500 452,232 2301 Zone 1 9,499 3102 9,702 500 10,202 7901 4,074 15,627 2302 Zone 2: LIS 72,539 3102 66,957 A (3,189) 4,200 67,968 7901 59,851 80,656 Zone 2: Drains 3,381 3103 652 652 8902 1,192 2,841 Prior Year Encumberance 5,000 (5,000) (5,000) 8019 0 0 Zone 2: Improvements 28,472 3101 6,230 5,000 11,230 8019 53,649 (13,947) 109,392 74,850 69,550 73,839 (3,189) 4,200 114,692 2303 Zone 3 1,723 3102 3,079 100 3,179 7901 2,876 2,026 2304 Zone 4 (687) 3102 6,383 100 6,483 7901 5,548 248 2305 Zone 5: LIS (13,596) 3102 23,340 23,340 7901 38,241 (28,497) Zone 5: Drains 1,473 3103 500 500 8902 4 1,969 (12,123) 23,840 0 0 23,840 38,245 (26,528) 2306 Zane 6 1,202 3102 823 823 7901 1,039 986 2307 Zone 7 (260) 3102 11,298 11,298 7901 14,104 13,066► 2308 Zone 8 8,110 3102 15,243 300 15,543 7901 14,843 8,810 2309 Zone 9 (7) 3102 1,350 1,350 7901 2,200 (857) 2310 Zone 10: LIS 101,456 3102 194,280 4,300 198,580 7901 188,792 111,244 Zone 10: Drains 18,052 3103 7,252 7,252 8902 1,300 24,004 119,508 201,532 0 4,300 205,832 190,092 135,248 2311 Zone 11 4,874 3102 3,040 200 3,240 7901 1,106 7,008 2312 Zone 12 165,338 3102 238,448 13,200 251,648 7901 99,812 317,174 2313 Zone 13 5,752 3102 0 100 100 7901 5,852 Sub -Total AD 84.2 527,764 965,512 (3,189) 28,500 990,823 940,863 577,724 2314 AD01.1 Wilshire Builders (450) 3102 1,180 1,180 7901 426 304 2315 ADO 1.2 Tall Bros 1,259 3102 461,354 12,000 473,354 7901 0 474,613 2316 AD01.3 Cabrillo: LIS 1,412 3102 2,860 400 3,260 7901 0 4,672 AD01.3 Cabrillo: Drains 3103 7,500 7,500 8902 0 7,500 1,412 10,360 0 400 10,760 0 12,172 Total Note A: Correction to FY00101 529,985 1 1,438,406 (3,189) 40,900 1 1,476,117 1 941,289 1 1,064,813 Page 3 e14 [File: adlunds 02 031 51612002 Less Ending Reserve Balance (38,944) 84,590 0 45,646 15,627 80,656 2,841 0 (13,947) 0 69,550 2,026 248 (28,497) 1,969 0 (26,528) 986 (3,066) 8,810 (857) 111,244 24,004 0 1 135,248 7,008 317,174 5,852 0 577,724 304 474,613 4,672 _ 7,500 0 12,172 0 1 1,064,813 f� f� Exhibit 2 Landscape I Lighting Page 4 of 4 Assessment Districts (File: adfunds 02 031 Fund Activity: FY02103 51612002 Revenue Beginning Rev. Total Exp. Total Available Less Ending Fund Description Balance Code 3100 Assmnt 215,762 Misc Interest Revenue Code Expenses Less Expenses Reserve Balance 2300 Lighting (38,944) 215,762 8901 250,000 (73,182) (73,182) Landscaping 84,590 3102 160,398 160,398 7901 218,798 26,190 (26,190) 0 45,646 376,160 (46,992) (26,190) (73,182) 376,160 0 0 468,798 2301 Zone 1 15,627 3102 9,702 500 10,202 7901 5,040 20,789 (20,789) 0 2302 Zone 2: LIS 80,656 3102 66,209 3,000 69,209 7901 63,714 86,151 (86,151) 0 Zane 2: Drains 2,841 3103 1,400 1,400 8902 258 3,983 (3,983) 0 Zone 2: Improvements (13,947) 3101 6,230 6,230 8019 0 (7,717) (7,717) 69,550 76,839 82,417 (90,134) (7,717) 73,839 0 3,000 63,972 2303 Zone 3 2,026 3102 3,079 100 3,179 7901 4,100 1,105 (1,105) 0 2304 Zone 248 3102 6,383 6,383 7901 6,300 331 (331) 0 0 2305 Zone 5: LIS (28,497) 3102 23,340 23,340 7901 46,300 (51,457) (51,457) Zone 5: Drains 1,969 3103 500 500 8902 272 2,197 (2,197) 0 (26,528) 23,840 0 0 23,840 46,572 (49,260) (2,197) (51,457) 2306 Zone 6 986 3102 924 924 7901 1,370 540 (540) 0 2307 Zone 7 (3,066) 3102 11,298 11,298 7901 13,770 (5,538) (5,538) 2308 Zone 8 8,810 3102 15,243 100 15,343 7901 13,387 10,766 (10,766) 0 2309 Zone 9 (857) 3102 1,350 1,350 7901 2,335 (1,842) (1,842) 2310 Zone 10: LIS 111,244 3102 194,280 600 194,880 7901 255,181 50,943 (50,943) 0 Zone 10: Drains 24,004 3103 7,252 7,252 8902 3,261 27,995 (27,995) 0 135,248 201,532 0 600 202,132 258,442 78,938 (78,938) 0 2311 Zone 11 7,008 3102 304 300 604 7901 1,120 6,492 (6,492) 0 2312 Zone 12 317,174 3102 238,448 18,000 256,448 7901 116,274 457,348 (457,348) 0 2313 Zone 13 5,852 3102 0 7901 5,852 0 0 Sub -Total AD 84.2 577,724 962,102 0 22,600 984,702 1,007,332 555,094 (694,830) (139,736) 2314 AD01.1 Wilshire Builders 304 3102 1,180 1,180 7901 1,180 304 (304) 0 2315 AD01.2 Toll Bros 474,613 3102 461,354 30,000 491,354 7901 412,500 553,467 (553,467) 0 2316 ADO1.3 Cabrillo: LIS 4,672 3102 2,860 1,000 3,860 7901 1,200 7,332 (7,332) 0 AD01.3 Cabrillo: Drains 7,500 3103 7,500 7,500 8902 9,280 5,720 (5,720) 0 12,172 11,360 13,052 (13,052) 0 10,360 0 1,000 10,480 1,064,813 1,488,596 1,431,492 1,121,917 (1,261,653) (139,736) Total 1,434,996 0 53,600 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, OF INTENTION TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 -03, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF HEARING FOR THE CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1944, the City Council ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the City's Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts (the "Assessment Districts ") for Fiscal Year 2002- 03; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's Report was prepared by Shilts Consultants, Inc., Engineer of work, in accordance with 22565, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Report ") and Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk and the City Council has reviewed the Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said Report and the levy of assessments recommended therein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Report for "Moorpark Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts ", for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2002 and ending on June 30, 2003, on file with the City Clerk, has been duly considered by the Moorpark City Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and approved. The Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under, and pursuant to, the foregoing resolution. SECTION 2. It is the intention of this Council to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment Districts for fiscal year 2002 -03. Within the Assessment Districts, the existing and proposed improvements, and any substantial changes proposed to be made to the existing improvements, are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities, including but not limited to, street lights, public lighting facilities, landscaping, sprinkler systems, statuary, fountains, other ornamental structures and facilities, landscape corridors, ground cover, shrubs and trees, street frontages, drainage systems, fencing, entry monuments, graffiti removal and repainting, Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned, operated or maintained by the City of Moorpark. Installation means the construction of lighting and landscaping improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage and lights. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping; and cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation or lighting of any improvements, and water for irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements. SECTION 3. The Assessment Districts consists of the lots and parcels shown on the boundary map of the Assessment Districts on file with the City Clerk, and reference is hereby made to such map for further particulars. SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment Districts, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment Districts. The Engineer's Report identifies all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. SECTION 5. The Fiscal Year 2002 -03 levy rates are not proposed to increase, with the exception of Zone 12, District 14, District 15 and District 16. The authorized maximum assessment rate for these Districts includes an annual adjustment by an amount equal to the annual change in the Los Angeles Area Consumer Price Index. As the amount of the annual increase in the Los Angeles Area Consumer Price Index from December 2000 to December 2001 is 2.1 %, the authorized maximum levy rate for fiscal year 2002 -03 is 2.1% above the maximum levy rate for fiscal year 2001 -02. Including the authorized annual adjustment, the maximum authorized assessment rates for fiscal year 2002 -03 are as follows: Zone 12 $ 408.94 per single family benefit unit $ 148.06 per acre of commercial or industrial property $1,332.94 per acre of institutional property Dist.14 $ 120.48 per single family benefit unit Dist.15 $1,452.56 per single family benefit unit Dist.16 $ 179.26 per single family benefit unit Resolution No. 2002 - Page 3 SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that on June 5, 2002, at the hour of 6:30 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, the Council will hold a public hearing to consider the ordering of the improvements and the levy of the proposed assessments. SECTION 7. Prior to the conclusion of the hearing, any interested person may file a written protest with the City Clerk, or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. A protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by such owner. Such protest or withdrawal of protest should be mailed to the City Clerk, City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a copy of this resolution once, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above specified, in a newspaper circulated in the City of Moorpark. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk ITEM -100 G MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT # # ## Supplemental # # ## TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: May 6, 2002 (CC Meeting 5- 15 -02) SUBJECT: Engineer's Report for Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Attached is the Engineer's Report for the subject item. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND ITEM A D• . . ....71 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL -- AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manage May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/15/02) CONSIDER ESTABLISHMENT OF A PARKING IN -LIEU FEE FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA The City Code requires that parking spaces for new uses and for enlargements of existing uses be provided in certain quantities outlined in Chapter 17.32. Also included in Chapter 17.32, Section .025 is a reduction to these quantities by one -half in the Downtown Area. Section .025 further states, "Of the parking required by this section, the applicant may choose to pay an in- lieu fee in order to reduce any portion of the parking spaces otherwise required to be provided on -site. The fee shall be established by city council resolution and shall be used to offset a portion of the cost required to construct public parking facilities in the downtown area." DISCUSSION The current architectural standard for the cost of a fully improved parking space is $8 /sq.ft., including landscaping and lighting. A single space requires 250 sq.ft., including on -site circulation, which calculates to $2,000 per parking space. The additional cost of the land of $4 /sq.ft. for the 250 sq.ft. parking space calculates to $1,000 per parking space, for a total of $12 /sq.ft. or $3,000 per parking space. The land cost is based on the approximate square foot cost that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency paid in the early 1990's to purchase the property, located on the south side of High Street extending east and west of Moorpark Avenue, from the Southern California Regional Rail Authority. It is assumed that the parking to be constructed would be on a portion of this Moorpark C Honorable City Council May 9, 2002 Page 2 Redevelopment Agency -owned property. When compared to the current market value of undeveloped commercial property in the High Street area at $12 - 15.00 /sq. ft., the $4.00 /sq. ft. fee for land cost is reasonable. The above figures and calculations will need to be periodically adjusted to accurately reflect the true costs of construction of public parking facilities for the Downtown Area. This fee falls under the regulation of Government Code sections 66000- 66025. Accordingly, the fee can only be established after meeting certain disclosure and timeline requirements. The attached "Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area Information Sheet" provides all the information required for disclosure by the Government Code. This information must be provided to the public at least 10 days in advance of the meeting in which the fee will be considered. Additionally, the establishment of this fee can only occur after a public hearing is held and the fee will be effective no sooner than 60 days after adoption of the resolution. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That City Council: 1.Approve the concept of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area as described in the staff report. 2. Direct staff to provide the required notices, and to advertise a public hearing on June 5, 2002 for the establishment by resolution of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area. Attachments: #1 - Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area Information Sheet #2 - March 27, 2002, Report of Parking Improvement Financing C Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area Information Sheet Purpose of Fee: To collect funds from appropriate sources for the purpose of obtaining and /or constructing public parking facilities in the Downtown Area. Use of the Funds: All funds generated by imposition of this fee, including any interest earned on these funds, will be used for the financing of public facilities. Specifically, the funds will be used to acquire, construct, remodel, landscape, light, and /or furnish public parking facilities in the Downtown Area. Relationship between Use of Fee /Need for Public Parking Facilities in the Downtown Area and Development: This fee will be imposed on all new uses and for enlargements of existing uses in the Downtown Area that are required to provide parking spaces in certain quantities outlined in Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark City Code. According to Section .025, applicants may choose to pay an in -lieu fee in order to reduce any portion of the parking spaces otherwise required to be provided on -site. Reasonableness of Fee: This fee was calculated as shown in "March 27, 2002, Report of Parking Improvement Financing ". In determining the fee to be charged to all new uses and enlargements of existing uses in the Downtown Area, factors such as architectural standards for the current, estimated costs per square foot for a fully improved parking space; the required square footage for regular and handicapped parking spaces, including circulation; and the per- square -foot cost of the land acquisition were considered. This project will be funded only partially with Parking In -Lieu fees collected as a result of this action. Cost of the Project and Funds Generated by this Fee: Current, estimated costs, based on architectural standards, indicate that the cost of constructing one fully improved parking space, including landscaping and lighting, is $8 per square foot. The cost per square foot for land acquisition, including on -site circulation, is $4 per square foot. This totals $12 per square foot. A single parking space requires 250 square feet; therefore, the estimated cost to construct a single parking space is $3,000 per parking space. This cost will increase if construction is delayed or if construction costs must be partially or wholly financed with long -term debt. This fee is anticipated to generate $3,000 per parking space. The revenues generated by this fee will not exceed the cost of providing the public parking facilities. ATTACHMENT ! C..., � �-� INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: Steve Kueny, City Manager FROM: Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Theater On High Parking Improvement Financing DATE: March 27, 2002 As requested the following may be used to structure a financing arrangement and/ or approval condition for the Theater On High parking. ASSUMPTIONS: Current City code requires a theater of this size to provide 84 parking spaces. This number is reduced by 50% in the downtown area by City Ordinance. Section 17.32.025 provides that the remaining parking may be further reduced by the payment of an "in lieu fee. The theater is then required to have 42 public, non - exclusive parking spaces including 2 handicapped spaces provided on or off site. Since the Theater On High ( "Applicant ") must provide the spaces off site it would agree to pay for the costs of constructing the public parking required for the theater use in exchange for permission to have this parking off site. Interim Temporary Improvements The Redevelopment Agency will provide temporary parking improvements at Agency expense of $17,700 and a land lease for $1 per year as approved by the Board. Permanent Improvements The architectural standard for the cost for a fully improved parking space is $ 8 per sq. ft including landscaping and lighting. A single space requires 250 ATTACHMENTA C , , City Manager Theater Parking March 27, 2002 Page 2 sq. ft including on -site circulation or $2,000 per space. A land cost of $4.00 per sq. ft. or $1,000 will be included. The $4.00 is the approximate amount the agency paid for the land in 1991. Permanent financing would be for a period of 20 years with 3% interest. The applicant would further agree that as: 1. In the event of default of the parking agreement, the Administrative Permit would be revoked. 2. At no time shall the theater show adult type movies rated X, XX or XXX, as such ratings are constituted on the effective date of approval of the permit, or a similar rating if such ratings system changes from time to time. At no time shall any portion of the theater be used for adult type businesses, as such businesses are defined, from time to time, in the Moorpark Municipal Code. These covenants shall remain in effect and shall run with the land for the life of the project and any extension thereof. 3. Applicant agrees to maintain parking area free of litter during and immediately after its performances. 4. No business signs will be located in the parking lot. 5. There will be no valet parking, preferred parking or reserved parking. 6. Payments for the permanent improvements will commence either 2 years from date of permit approval or upon completion of construction of the permanent improvements, whichever is later. The Redevelopment Agency agrees to sweep the lot as needed and to pay for cost of pavement, landscaping and lighting maintenance because it is public parking. CALCULATION: Improvements - 42 parking improved spaces @ $ 2,000 = $84,000 _ 20 Years = $ 4,200 /yr. - 12 months = $ 350 per month City Manager Theater Parking March 27, 2002 Page 3 Land - 250 sq. ft. X 42 spaces = 10,500 sq. ft. @ $4 = $42,000 - 20 years = $2,100 /yr. _ 12 months = $175 per month. MONTHLY PAYMENT: The monthly payment with 3% interest would be $ 698.79. COST TO AGENCY FOR TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS: Property available on High Street across from Theater and at southwest corner of Moorpark Avenue and High Street can provide approximately 200 parking spaces @ 250 sq. ft. per space including isle allowance and modest landscaping. Improvement cost by City forces would include: • 4 inches of base material: 436 T x $12 $ 5,200 • In house labor $ 2,800 • 2 - A.C. surface handicapped spaces w/ markings $ 3,100 $11,100 • Oil surface, layout, telephone pole parking barriers markings and other miscellaneous improvements, etc. $ 3,500 SUBTOTAL $14,600 • Lighting $ 2,000 • Striping and annual restoration (2 years) $ 4,200 TOTAL $ 20,800 RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Agency proceed with temporary improvement of parking areas at a cost of $20,800 and enter into an annual ground lease at $1 per year with Lawrence Janss Co. C.... v �-.,. City Manager Theater Parking March 27, 2002 Page 4 2. That the Agency provide financing for the costs of thethe required permanent parking improvements at 3% interest for 20 years beginning at the completion of the permanent improvements or 2 years from permit approval whichever is later. 3. That the City Council set appropriate parking -in -lieu fees by resolution. D i Moorpark Rotary Club i r2 ITEM 10* E • April 11, 2002 I 1 Mayor Patrick Hunter c,f �- City of Moorpark At pire,J, _,l 799 Moorpark Avenue `_' �` ins eovcr ►�`��'' `'r�" ��`* Moorpark, CA 93021 Honorable Mayor and City Council, Last November 17 -18, 2001, the Moorpark Rotary Club presented Gettysburg, A Civil War Battle and En- campment. This historical event was attended by close to four thousand people. With over 450 reenactors, 50 horses, 15 cannons and pyrotechnic ground charges, this first time event was educational, as well as spectacular to view. The event included Mr. Lincoln repeating his famous Gettysburg Address, General Lee's surrender to General Grant, and so much more. This family themed event allowed the Rotary Club to donate over $25,000 that was dispersed to over twenty community organizations and Moorpark High School graduating seniors scholarships. This major fund- raiser will again be presented on November 2 -3, 2002, and the plan is to make this an annual event. As you are aware, without dedicated people and sponsors this event would not be possible. Respectfully, the Moorpark Rotary Club requests you consider joining our other sponsors to help expand this year's event. The City's participation could include, park reader boards, an ad in the City's quarterly magazine, posters at City facilities, mentioning the event at City Council meetings, as well as financial support. Sincerely, Dale Parvin Event Coordinator Fund - raising Chairman D n Rnv 1 77 UnnrnaA- r 9 0 )WI -n 1 T) V v y ✓d ITEM . ILAA CITY OF MOORPARK WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR - CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1 S, 2802;'�L`' SEOUENCE AMOUNT From To MANUAL 109239 - 109251 $ 33,369.82 WARRANTS VOIDED 109243 - 109244 & $ 0.00 WARRANTS 109358 $ 33,369.82 PAYROLL LIABILITY 109379 - 109386 $ 11,450.89 WARRANTS REGULAR 109252 - 109354 & $ 26,924.30 WARRANTS 109355 - 109378 $ 976,657.15 TOTAL $ 1,048,402.16 C. V y y r✓ ~ 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 0100 - INTERNAL SERVICES FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 0100 3751 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 AP050102 5 /02COBRA DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE r; C t L) PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 174.94 0.00 0.00 174.94 RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:42 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 174.94 174.94 174.94 174.94 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100011000000 9223 SALVATION ARMY N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 04/29/02 180.00 AP050102 NATL DAY PRAYER BREA 20 TABLE #20 05/01/02 109245 0.00 0.00 180.00 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL CHECK AMT 180.00 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL NET PAYABLE 180.00 100021000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 3029.46 AP050102 5 /02C MGR MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 3029.46 100021000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 447.88 AP050102 5/02C MGR DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 447.88 100021000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 140.01 AP050102 5/02C MGR LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 140.01 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT 3617.35 TOTAL CITY N.ANAGER NET PAYABLE 3617.35 100031000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1197.26 AP050102 5 /02C CLERK MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 1197.26 10003100000C 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 61.99 AP050102 5/02C CLERK DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 61.99 100031000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 25.60 AP050102 5/02C CLERK LTD & ST 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 25.60 TOTAL CITY CLERK CHECK AMT 1284.85 TOTAL CITY CLERK NET PAYABLE 1284.85 100031100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 217.74 AP050102 5 /02HR MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 217.74 100031100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.07 AP050102 5 /02HR DNTL,LIFE,LTD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 42.07 100031100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 21.82 AP050102 5 /02HR LTD & STD INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 21.82 �?QTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT 281.63 AL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 281.63 j i RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:43 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100051000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1551.12 AP050102 5 /02ADMIN MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 1551.12 100051000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 283.81 AP050102 5 /02ADMIN DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 283.81 100051000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 58.40 AP050102 5 /02ADMIN LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 58.40 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHECK AMT 1893.33 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 1893.33 100051001004 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 549.17 AP050102 5 /02ADMIN MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 549.17 100051001004 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 106.44 AP050102 5 /02ADMIN DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 106.44 100051001004 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 43.82 AP050102 5 /02IS MGR LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 43.82 TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) CHECK AMT 699.43 TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) NET PAYABLE 699.43 100051100000 901C PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 2333.94 AP050102 5 /02FINANCE MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 2333.94 100051100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 267.03 AP050102 5 /02FINANCE DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 267.03 100051100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 107.26 AP050102 5 /02FINANCE LTD & ST 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 107.28 TOTAL FINANCE CHECK AMT 2708.25 TOTAL FINANCE NET PAYABLE 2708.25 100071000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 301.04 AP050102 5 /02COMM SRV MEDICAL 20 MAY C2 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 301.04 18Q071000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 69.97 l AP050102 5 /02COM SRVC DNTL,LI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 69.97 CJ t RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:43 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING G} 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100071000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 30.35 AP050102 5 /02COMM SRVC LTD & 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 30.35 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT 401.36 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 401.36 100075200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1101.48 AP050102 5 /02VECTOR MEDICAL I 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 1101.48 100075200000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 240.20 AP050102 5 /02VECTOR DNTL,LIFE 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 240.20 100075200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 45.39 AP050102 5 /02VECTOR LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 45.39 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT 1387.07 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE 1387.07 100076100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 902.49 AP050102 5 /02SR CTR MEDICAL I 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 902.49 100076100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 120.10 AP050102 5 /02SR CTR DNTL,LIFE 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 120.10 100076100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 20.75 AP050102 5 /02SR CTR LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 20.75 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT 1043.34 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE 1043.34 100076200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 945.92 AP050102 5 /02COMM FAC MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 945.92 100076200000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 180.16 AP050102 5 /02COM FAC DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 180.16 100076200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 31.93 AP050102 5 /02COMM FAC LTD & S 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 31.93 DOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES CHECK AMT 1158.01 ('PPTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES NET PAYABLE 1158.01 i e RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100076300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 -28.60 AP050102 5 /02REC MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 -28.80 100076300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 128.88 AP050102 5 /02REC DNTL,LIFE,LT 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 128.88 100076300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 49.23 AP050102 5 /02REC LTD & STD IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 49.23 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT 149.31 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 149.31 100076301007 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 217.74 AP050102 5 /02TEEN COORD MEDIC 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 217.74 1CO076301007 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.07 AP050102 5 /02TEEN COORD DNTL, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 42.07 100076301007 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 15.44 AP050102 5 /02TEEN COORD LTD & 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 15.44 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) CHECK AMT 275.25 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) NET PAYABLE 275.25 100081000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 337.23 AP050102 5 /02PW MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 337.23 100081000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 69.16 AP050102 5 /02PW DNTL,LIFE,LTD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 69.16 100081000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 18.63 AP050102 5 /02PW LTD & STD INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 18.63 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS CHECK AMT 425.02 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS NET PAYABLE 425.02 100083200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 20.02 AP050102 5 /02NPDES MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 20.02 83200000 ley 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 3.42 AP050102 5 /02NPDES DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 3.42 J i RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING ++ �. I 05/06/02 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 6 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100083200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1.23 AP050102 5 /02NPDES LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 1.23 TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT 24.67 TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE 24.67 100092000000 9225 TUMBLESON, DEPUTY ED N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.00 AP050102 PEACE OFFICERS MEM P 20 EXP REP 5/4 05/01/02 109247 0.00 0.00 42.00 100092000000 9225 JENKINSON, DEPUTY ST N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.00 AP050102 PEACE OFFICERS MEM P 20 EXP REP 5/4 05/01/02 109248 0.00 0.00 42.00 100092000000 9225 ALVAREZ, DEPUTY DAMI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.00 AP050102 PEACE OFFICERS MEM P 20 EXP REP 5/4 05/01/02 109250 0.00 0.00 42.00 100092000000 9225 GALITZ, DEPUTY PHIL N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.00 AP050102 PEACE OFFICERS MEM P 20 EXP REP 5/4 05/01/02 109249 0.00 0.00 42.00 100092000000 9225 RICH, DEPUTY KIM N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 42.00 AP050102 PEACE OFFICERS MEM P 20 EXP REP 5/4 05/01/02 109246 0.00 0.00 42.00 100092000000 9225 SHERATON GRAND SACRA N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 424.49 AP050102 5 /2PEACE OFFICERS LO 20 EXP REP 5/2 05/01/02 109251 0.00 0.00 424.49 TOTAL POLICE SERVICES CHECK AMT 634.49 TOTAL POLICE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 634.49 TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT 16163.36 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE 16163.36 RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:45 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2000 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 200082100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CROSS GUARD MEDI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 200082100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CROSS GUARD DNTL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 200082100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CROSS GUARD LTD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE 200083300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PRKNG ENF MEDICA 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 200083300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PRKNG ENF DNTL,L 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 200083300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PRKNG ENF LTD & 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE c� c� to RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:45 PAGE 7 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE. 182.57 182.57 -12.19 -12.19 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING -2.74 -2.74 167.64 167.64 546.11 546.11 98.40 98.40 21.24 21.24 665.75 665.75 833.39 833.39 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2003 - CROSSING GUARD FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 200382100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 - 268.46 AP050102 5 /02CROSS GUARD MEDI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 - 268.46 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND NET PAYABLE l ` �J RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:45 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 268.46 - 268.46 - 268.46 - 268.46 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2151 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 215121002002 9632 ROCK DESIGNS POOLS &W N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 02/13/02 3000.00 AP050102 FINAL ACCEPTANCE -MPK 20 3312 05/01/02 109242 0.00 0.00 3000.00 TOTAL WATERSCAPE CHECK AMT 3000.00 TOTAL WATERSCAPE NET PAYABLE 3000.00 TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES CHECK AMT 3000.00 TOTAL ART IN PUBLIC PLACES NET PAYABLE 3000.00 1 J C f is RIJN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:45 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 10 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 220061000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1190.67 AP050102 5 /02COMM DEV MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 1190.67 220061000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 173.51 AP050102 5 /02COM DEV DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 173.51 220061000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 58.19 AP050102 5 /02COMM DEV LTD & S 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 58.19 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 1422.37 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 1422.37 220064300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 644.87 AP050102 5 /02CEO MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 644.87 220064300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 142.42 AP050102 5 /02CEO DNTL,LIFE,LT 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 142.42 220064300000 9010 METROPOLITA-N INSURA -N N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 58.39 AP050102 5 /02CEO LTD & STD IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 58.39 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT 845.68 TOTAL, CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 845.68 220064400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 3242.55 AP050102 5 /02PLANNING MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 3242.55 220064400000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 561.57 AP050102 5 /02PLANNING DNTL,LI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 561.57 220064400000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 105.24 AP050102 5 /02PLANNING LTD & S 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 105.24 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT 3909.36 TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE 3909.36 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 6177.41 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 6177.41 Ci c? �+ RUN DATE Li 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANJAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2201 - CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 220124300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02AFF HOUSE MEDICA 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 220124300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02AFF HOUSE DNTL,L 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 220124300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02AFF HOUSE LTD & 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL, CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING NET PAYABLE CJ RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:46 PAGE 11 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 32.66 32.66 PENTAMATION - Fi,'ND ACCOUNTING 6.31 6.31 4.74 4.74 43.71 43.71 43.71 43.71 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C I*IVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 230079007901 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 230079007901 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 230079007901 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE �y C' c� RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME. 15:48:46 PAGE. 12 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 202.34 202.34 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 42.04 42.04 9.72 9.72 254.10 254.10 254.10 254.10 05/06/02 CI ^Y OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 240078000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 240078000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 240078000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 240078001001 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 240078001001 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 240078001001 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PARKS LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) NET PAYABLE '"OTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE CJ RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:46 J PAGE 13 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1451.72 1451.72 297.09 297.09 65.88 65.88 1814.69 1814.69 566.14 566.14 120.10 120.10 14.70 14.70 700.94 700.94 2515.63 2515.63 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 260583100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02ST MAINT MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 26058310000C 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02ST MAINT DNTL,LI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 260583100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02ST MAINT LTD & S 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 260589008902 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 MEDICAL IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 260589008902 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 DNTL,LIFE, 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 260589008902 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5/02AD842 LTD & STD 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT TOTAI: GAS TAX NET PAYABLE C RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:47 PAGE 14 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 1691.71 1691.71 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 342.31 342.31 127.12 127.12 2161.14 2161.14 41.54 41.54 8.97 8.97 2.85 2.85 53.36 53.36 2214.50 2214.50 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2701 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 270124400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CDBG MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 270124400000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CDBG DNTL,LIFE,L 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 270124400000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02CDBG LTD & STD I 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:47 PAGE 15 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 54.44 54.44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 10.52 10.52 7.89 7.89 72.85 72.85 72.85 72.85 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 290124200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA MEDICAL INS 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 290124200000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA DNTL,LIFE,LT 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 290124200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA LTD & STD IN 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE TOTA:, MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE J `a RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:47 PAGE 16 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 357.44 357.44 65.18 65.18 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 21.98 21.98 444.60 444.60 444.60 444.60 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 290224100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA /ECO MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 290224100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA /ECO DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 290224100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02MRA /EC0 LTD & ST 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT TOTAI, MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE ;•1 4 ` 1 i Mm RUN DATE 05 /06/02 TIME 15:48:47 PAGE. 17 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 729.67 729.67 170.56 170.56 36.86 36.86 937.09 937.09 937.09 937.09 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 5000 - LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 500073100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PUB TRANS MEDICA 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 500073100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PUB TRAN DNTL,LI 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 500073100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02PUB TRANS LTD & 20 MAY C2 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE 1 � c� LI RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:47 PAGE 18 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 168.05 168.05 29.63 29.63 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 16.41 16.41 214.09 214.09 214.09 214.09 05/06/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 5001 - SOLID WASTE AB939 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 500175307501 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 i101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 500175307501 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 500175307501 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST LTD & ST 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL USED OIL GRANT CHECK AMT TOTAL USED OIL GRANT NET PAYABLE 500175307502 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST MEDICAL 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109239 0.00 0.00 500175307502 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 05/01/02 1i01 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST DNTL,LIF 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109241 0.00 0.00 500175307502 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 05/01/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 AP050102 5 /02SLD WST LTD & ST 20 MAY 02 05/01/02 109240 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE i� t 1a Wry RUN DATE 05/06/02 TIME 15:48:48 PAGE 19 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 45.12 45.12 4.21 4.2.1 3.41 3.41 52.74 52.74 438.76 438.76 54.87 54.87 46.24 46.24 539.87 539.87 592.61 592.61 33369.82 33369.82 05/08/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109379 1101 05/10/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 109380 1101 05/10/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 109380 1101 05/10/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 109381 1101 05/10/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 109382 1101 05/10/02 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 109383 1101 05/10/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 109384 1101 05/10/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 109385 1101 05/10/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 109385 1101 05/10/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 109386 1101 05/10/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 1 ca c V� PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 124.32 F/T REG DEFER COMP 897.33 F/T REG DEFER COMP 2,110.15 3,007.48 UNION DUES 350.75 CASE #SD020444 2,172.50 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 118.00 ID #9600616061 168.46 F/T REG DEFER COMP 3,466.62 F/T REG DEFER COMP 1,549.75 5,016.37 P/T REG DEFER COMP 493.01 11,450.89 11,450.89 RUN DATE 05/08/02 TIME 11:52:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/08/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS C7 c� r� L� FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 11,450.89 TOTAL REPORT 11,450.89 RUN DATE 05/08/02 TIME 11:52:46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 AMOUNT ENVIRONMENTAL SITE COPIES 40.00 4 /02AVRC CELLPHONE CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: SZABO -WEEK ENDED4 /12 -32HR 11 /01 4 /02ANSWERING SERVICE CHECK REGISTER 4 /02FAX SERVICE FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 519.95 02 DRUG ID BIBLE CHECK NUMBER 25' ALUMINUM FLAGPOLE CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109252 100.00 1101 05/08/02 1002 A G I GEOTECHNICAL, INC 9232 109253 ADULT DANCE CLASS INSTRUC 1101 05/08/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9420 109254 150.00 1101 05/08/02 1004 A T & T WIRELESS SVCS 9420 109255 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT 1101 05/08/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 109256 80.00 1101 05/08/02 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 109256 MTN MEADOWS PRK DRAIN BOX 1101 05/08/02 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 TOTAL CHECK 109257 1101 05/08/02 2386 AGRX 9320 109258 1101 05/08/02 3079 AMERA -CHEM, INC. 9220 109259 1101 05/08/02 2969 AMERICAN FLAG & BANNER CO 9205 109260 1101 05/08/02 3108 ARTEAGA, JORGE 2606 109261 1101 05/08/02 2860 B.T.R. INC. 9244 109262 1101 05/08/02 3109 BARAJAS, LISA 2606 109263 1101 05/08/02 2490 BJORKLAND, PAMELA G. 9160 109264 1101 05/08/02 3102 BLUM, SHARI L. 9160 109265 1101 05/08/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9102 109266 1101 05/08/02 1983 BYAM, JAY H 9160 109267 1101 05/08/02 1094 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC 9221 109268 110i 05/08/02 1102 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREAT 9236 109269 1101 05/08/02 3129 CARDIEL, JOE 2606 109270 1101 05/08/02 3111 CEJA. ROSALBA 2606 109271 1101 05/08/02 2360 CHANNEL ISLANDS AKITA CLU 2606 109272 110i 05/08/02 1123 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9102 109273 1101 05/08/02 3024 CHICAGO TITLE ESCROW 9610 109273 1101 05/08/02 3024 CHICAGO TITLE ESCROW 9610 J TOTAL CHECK 109274 i,j 1101 05/08/02 1708 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF 2606 ` 109275 1101 05/08/02 1136 COACH USA 9103 109275 ` 1101 05/08/02 1136 COACH USA 9103 TOTAL CHECK 109276 1101 05/08/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 109276 1101 05/08/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT ENVIRONMENTAL SITE COPIES 40.00 4 /02AVRC CELLPHONE 29.05 4/02 798 MPK AVE LONG DIS 20.90 SZABO -WEEK ENDED4 /12 -32HR 720.00 4 /02ANSWERING SERVICE 61.00 4 /02FAX SERVICE 7.80 68.80 PW ROUNDUP 519.95 02 DRUG ID BIBLE 39.95 25' ALUMINUM FLAGPOLE 752.90 REFUND -AVCP SEC DEPOSIT 100.00 4 /26TEEN EVENT PIZZA 120.00 REFUND- POINDEXTER PRK DEP 100.00 BELLYDANCING INSTRUCTOR 312.00 INSTRUCT ACTING CLASSES 719.70 CITY BUS #33 REPAIRS 254.48 ADULT DANCE CLASS INSTRUC 610.80 RENEW CLASS 1 MEMBERSHIP 215.00 2 /02RECREATION SUP JOB AD 80.00 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 150.00 REFUND - POINDEXTER PRK DEP 100.00 REFUND- GRIFFIN PRK DEPOSI 100.00 SP #19 CLOSING COSTS 426.00 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT 500.00 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT 500.00 1,000.00 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 80.00 SR CTR BUS TRIP TO GETTY 339.50 5 %FUEL SURCHG -SR TO GETTY 18.68 358.18 MTN MEADOWS PRK DRAIN BOX 35.94 CAMPUS PRK DRAIN BOXES 35.93 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 66.18 AVCP DRAIN BOXES 35.93 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 OFFICE PRO UPGRADE ADVANT CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 359.29 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109276 SKATE FEST DEEJAY 1101 05/08/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 109276 450.00 1101 05/06/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 664.50 TOTAL CHECK -99.68 MPK MARKETPLACE ADMIN FEE 109277 1101 05/08/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9208 109277 3 /02EMP FINGERPRINTS -2 1101 05/08/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9208 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 TOTAL CHECK CAMP MPK CRAFT SUPPLIES 340.03 109278 28.24 1101 05/08/02 3110 COX, ANITA 3865 109279 1101 05/08/02 1934 CPRS 9221 109280 1101 05/08/02 1582 CREATIVE SOUNDS 9243 109280 100.00 1101 05/08/02 1582 CREATIVE SOUNDS 9243 135.55 TOTAL CHECK 81.11 FINAL PYMT- INCIDENTAL FEE 109281 1101 05/08/02 1167 D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED 9244 109282 CONCRETE FORMS 1101 05/08/02 2367 DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES 2755 109282 1101 05/08/02 2367 DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES 3806 109282 1101 05/08/02 2367 DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES 2734 TOTAL CHECK 109283 1101 05/08/02 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 109283 1101 05/08/02 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 TOTAL CHECK 109284 1101 05/08/02 1181 DICECCO, MARK 9001 109285 1101 05/08/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 109286 1101 05/08/02 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9304 109287 1101 05/08/02 2603 DOROJINSKI, VLADIMIR 9102 109288 1101 05/08/02 1690 DOYLE SHAW ICE 9204 109289 1101 05/08/02 1196 DUNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 109289 1101 05/08/02 1196 DUNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9204 TOTAL CHECK 109290 1101 05/08/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9230 109291 1101 05/08/02 1258 HALLER, PAUL 9001 109292 1101 05/08/02 2940 HAROLD C. WHITE 9283 109293 1101 05/08/02 3018 HATCHER, EDDIE 3404 { 109294 \ 1101 05/08/02 2919 HAZEL V MUNGER 3404 109294 / 1101 05/08/02 2919 HAZEL V MUNGER 9285 TOTAL CHECK 109295 1101 05/08/02 3128 HEARON, MARK 2606 109296 1101 05/08/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9310 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PAGE 2 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CAMPUS PRK IRRIGATION PAR 66.18 AVCP DRAIN BOXES 35.93 173.98 OFFICE PRO UPGRADE ADVANT 284.21 VALUERAM 128MB PC133 SDRA 75.08 359.29 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE 52.00 02/03 LOOSBROCK MEMBERSHI 145.00 SKATE FEST DEEJAY 375.00 CLUB 45 -50 DEEJAY 75.00 450.00 WOMEN'S SOCCER T- SHIRTS 289.36 MPK MARKETPLACE ELECTRICA 664.50 MPK MARKETPLACE ADMIN REV -99.68 MPK MARKETPLACE ADMIN FEE 99.68 664.50 3 /02EMP FINGERPRINTS -2 64.00 3 /02EMP FINGERPRINTS -2 64.00 128.00 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 CAMP MPK CRAFT SUPPLIES 340.03 PW VEST 28.24 4 /02SR CTR CROSS TRAINING 138.50 VECTOR DRY ICE 11.00 ALL PARKS PAINT SUPPLIES 43.32 PARKS PAINT 15.93 59.25 WILLIAMS -CA JPIA 7.27 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 SP 57 MOBILEHOME APPRAISA 350.00 REFUND- UTILITY OVERPAYMEN 135.55 REFUND- UTILITY OVERPYMT 81.11 FINAL PYMT- INCIDENTAL FEE 747.00 828.11 REFUND -PEACH HILL DEPOSIT 100.00 CONCRETE FORMS 49.44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 76.15 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 166.08 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 COM FAC CLEANING SUPPLIES CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED #31 CITY BUS REPAIRS 188.23 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109296 DOG OBEDIENCE INSTRUCTOR 1101 05/08/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9310 109296 311.00 1101 05/08/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 776.58 TOTAL CHECK 95.45 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 109297 1101 05/08/02 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 109298 1101 05/08/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102 109298 143.81 1101 05/08/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102 109298 1101 05/08/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102 4/26- 5 /23SKATERAMP RENTAL TOTAL CHECK MAP MODIFICATIONS & PRINT 106.81 109299 VECTOR LAY MASH 1101 05/08/02 1311 JOHNSON, KIM 9160 109299 18.20 1101 05/08/02 1311 JOHNSON, KIM 9233 19.28 TOTAL CHECK 240.94 2/18 -3/7 UTILITY USAGE 109300 1101 05/08/02 3127 KING, GWEN 9160 109301 REFUND -WEST COAST SWING 1101 05/08/02 1323 KUENY, STEVEN 9225 109302 41.46 1101 05/08/02 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 109303 1101 05/08/02 1329 LANDIS, KIPP A 9001 109304 1101 05/08/02 2344 LOOSBROCK, RACHELE 9224 109304 1101 05/08/02 2344 LOOSBROCK, RACHELE 9225 TOTAL CHECK 109305 1101 05/08/02 2937 MARGARET L ROTHSCHILD 9225 109305 1101 05/08/02 2937 MARGARET L ROTHSCHILD 9224 TOTAL CHECK 109306 1101 05/08/02 3126 MEZA, MARIA 2611 109306 1101 05/08/02 3126 MEZA, MARIA 3401 TOTAL CHECK 109307 1101 05/08/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 109308 1101 05/08/02 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9232 109309 1101 05/08/02 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY 9204 109309 1101 05/08/02 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY 9204 TOTAL CHECK 109310 1101 05/08/02 3130 MUSIC GO ROUND 9243 109311 1101 05/08/02 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 109312 1101 05/08/02 2992 NUNGARAY, RUBEN 2614 109312 ( 1101 05/08/02 2992 NUNGARAY, RUBEN 9413 TOTAL CHECK ( 109313 i 1101 05/08/02 3121 ONDERSTAL, JUDY 3862 109313] 1101 05/08/02 3121 ONDERSTAL, JUDY 3862 TOTAL CHECK 109314 1101 05/08/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9204 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PAGE 3 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CONCRETE FORMS 76.15 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 166.08 291.67 COM FAC CLEANING SUPPLIES 174.31 #33 CITY BUS REPAIRS 458.25 #31 CITY BUS REPAIRS 188.23 #33 CITY BUS REPAIRS 111.13 757.61 DOG OBEDIENCE INSTRUCTOR 396.00 DOG OBEDIENCE INSURANCE -85.00 311.00 SINGING INSTRUCTOR PYMT 90.00 ASPA CONF LODGING & EXPEN 776.58 PW YARD CONCRETE 95.45 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 CPRS CONFERENCE MILEAGE 53.29 CPRS CONFERENCE PARKING 14.00 67.29 4/3 -6CPRS CONF TRVL COSTS 24.21 4/3 -6CPRS CONF MILEAGE 143.81 168.02 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 300.00 STAFF - CLEANING TIME -36.00 264.00 4/26- 5 /23SKATERAMP RENTAL 72.40 MAP MODIFICATIONS & PRINT 106.81 VECTOR LAY MASH 9.10 VECTOR LAY MASH 9.10 18.20 5/11 BATTLE OF THE BANDS 150.00 #15 WIPER BLADES 19.28 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 240.94 2/18 -3/7 UTILITY USAGE -26.95 213.99 ADMIN FEE -10.00 REFUND -WEST COAST SWING 90.00 80.00 PARKS OPERATING SUPPLIES 41.46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 171.59 42.00 DANCE CLASS 213.05 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 4 /02METROLINK SWEEPING CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED POSTAGE METER TAPES 74.42 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109314 BEACH BUS BANNER 1101 05/08/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9208 WIDE FORMAT AERIAL PHOTOS 40.22 TOTAL CHECK 4 /17CC MTG PACKETS 106.82 109315 291.72 1101 05/08/02 1425 OTTO, JR. WILLIAM F. 9001 109316 1101 05/08/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9352 109317 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 1101 05/08/02 1436 PARVIN, JANICE 9001 109318 15.93 1101 05/08/02 1210 PAS /EMECO 9250 109319 1101 05/08/02 1445 PICON, INC 9620 109320 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109320 64.52 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9620 109320 1101 05/08/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 TOTAL CHECK 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 109321 1101 05/08/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 TOTAL CHECK 109322 1101 05/08/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 109323 1101 05/08/02 3120 RAMIREZ, JOSEPH 3301 109324 1101 05/08/02 3118 RAMIREZ, JUDY 2611 109325 1101 05/08/02 3116 REID, MARIA 3865 109326 1 1101 05/08/02 3119 ROCKHURST COLLEGE CONTINU 9222 109327 1101 05/08/02 3117 RUIZ, ALDA 3866 109328 y 1101 05/08/02 1497 SALAZAR, REBECCA L 9160 109329 Y 1101 05/08/02 3113 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPAN 9244 109330 1101 05/08/02 3113 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPAN 9244 109331 1101 05/08/02 3115 SHAPLAND, P:IYLLIS 3862 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PAGE 4 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT PARKS JIGSAW 171.59 42.00 DANCE CLASS 213.05 571.20 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 139.41 4 /02METROLINK SWEEPING 535.23 4/8 COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 POSTAGE METER TAPES 74.42 4 /02AVCP RESTROOM PROJECT 885.50 FINANCE RECEIPTS 206.13 BEACH BUS BANNER 41.83 MPK TRANSIT RFP 29.90 WIDE FORMAT AERIAL PHOTOS 40.22 4 /17CC MTG PACKETS 106.82 5 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER 291.72 AVCP RR /SNACK BAR PROJECT 37.48 MPK TRANSIT RFP 29.90 784.00 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 15.93 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.93 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.92 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 15.93 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.93 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.92 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 26.69 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 34.32 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 16.69 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 18.11 COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL 64.52 255.89 CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 12.12 REFUND -CIT #165009 50.00 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 300.00 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE 52.00 5/7 M RILEY COMMUNICATION 395.00 REFUND -TEEN BSKTBL LEAGUE 42.00 DANCE CLASS INSTRUCTOR 571.20 CAMP MPK AIR HOCKEY TABLE 139.41 CAMP MPK NINE IN 1 GAME 300.29 REFUND -CLASS BALANCE 10.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 10.79 2- 3 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL 26.96 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 2- 3 /02CEO FUEL CHECK REGISTER 2- 3 /02PW ADMIN FUEL FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 53.98 2- 3 /02PARKS FUEL CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109332 1101 05/08/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 TOTAL CHECK 109333 1101 05/08/02 1515 SIMI PACIFIC BLDG. MATERI 9252 109334 1101 05/08/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9208 109334 1101 05/08/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9204 TOTAL CHECK 109335 1101 05/08/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9243 109335 1101 05/08/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9243 109335 1101 05/08/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9243 109335 1101 05/08/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9243 TOTAL CHECK 109336 1101 05/08/02 1538 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MUNIC 9244 109337 1101 05/08/02 2037 STEPHANIE A SHAW 9244 109338 1101 05/08/02 3114 STEPHENS, MARY 3865 109339 1101 05/08/02 1552 STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL 9201 109340 1101 05/08/02 1228 FLAME, JASON I 9160 109341 1101 05/08/02 1563 TARGET BUSINESS PRODUCTS 9243 109342 1101 05/08/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9240 109342 1101 05/08/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9240 109342 1101 05/08/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9240 TOTAL CHECK 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9244 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9244 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9243 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9243 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9243 109343 1101 05/08/02 1594 U.S. TOY COMPANY, INC 9243 J TOTAL CHECK ri 109344 1101 05/08/02 1596 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 9102 t/ 1 109345 t 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 109345 i A 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 109345 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 109345 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 109345 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 109345 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PAGE 5 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 2- 3 /02ARROYO VISTA FUEL 10.79 2- 3 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL 26.96 2- 3 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL 6.97 2- 3 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL 10.45 2- 3 /02CEO FUEL 11.89 2- 3 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 9.38 2- 3 /02PW STREETS FUEL 53.98 2- 3 /02PARKS FUEL 70.10 2- 3 /02VECTOR FUEL 96.41 296.93 AVRC ENTRANCE WALL REPAIR 80.44 COUNTY ANIMAL POUND KEYS 118.58 CITY HALL LOCKS 189.06 307.64 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION SUP 115.53 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION SUP 49.79 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION SUP 61.04 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 321.20 547.56 ADLT SOFTBALL REGISTRATIO 324.00 CAMP MPK GAMING SYSTEM 217.98 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 52.00 HP & XEROX INK CARTRIDGES 634.92 KARATE INSTRUCTOR PYMT 207.00 SR CTR COFFEE MUGS - VOLUNT 298.00 MPK PD PLAQUES ENGRAVED 38.31 MPK PD PLAQUE ENGRAVING 54.02 MPK PD ENGRAVING 153.36 245.69 CAMP & EVENT SUPPLIES 195.74 CAMP & EVENT SUPPLIES 25.25 CAMP & EVENT SUPPLIES 298.37 CAMP & EVENT SUPPLIES 38.50 FREIGHT (CAMP AND EVENT S 9.57 CAMP & EVENT SUPPLIES 74.15 641.58 UNDERGROUND MILEAGE CHARG 325.00 1- 2 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 16.79 1- 2 /02MPK PD FUEL 38.36 1- 2 /02VECTOR FUEL 87.81 1- 2 /02PARKS FUEL 90.17 1- 2 /02PW STREETS FUEL 428.06 1- 2/02AD842 FUEL 16.76 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 109345 1101 05/08/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 1- 2 /02RECREATION FUEL 137.48 TOTAL CHECK 815.43 109346 1101 05/08/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9232 POLICE SITE TRACT MAP 8.04 109346 1101 05/08/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 AVCP RESTROOMS 27.91 109346 1101 05/08/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 MILLER PRKWY WIDENING PRO 76.36 109346 1101 05/08/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9205 OLD PARK PLANS COPIES 32.48 109346 1101 05/08/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 AVCP RESTROOMS 8.15 TOTAL CHECK 152.94 109347 1101 05/08/02 3112 VARGO, MICHAEL 3862 REFUND- TENNIS CLASS 48.00 109348 1101 05/08/02 2861 VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY 9223 6 /13ASSESSING COMM NEEDS 40.00 109348 1101 05/08/02 2861 VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY 9223 6 /18BLDNG BETTER BRIDGES 40.00 TOTAL CHECK 80.00 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 20.83 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 42.75 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 3.01 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 13.50 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 5.41 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 3.00 109349 1101 05/08/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 3 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 61.50 TOTAL CHECK 150.00 109350 1101 05/08/02 1631 WEST GROUP 9220 CA CODES ANNO V23A -23D 128.70 109351 1101 05/08/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9310 PW STEEL WIRE 10.48 109351 1101 05/08/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW PLUNGER 9.64 109351 1101 05/08/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 CAMPUS PRK MAINTENANCE 25.11 TOTAL CHECK 45.23 109352 1101 05/08/02 1731 WM. L. MORRIS CHEVROLET 9254 #22 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 296.17 109353 1101 05/08/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 3 /19- 4 /19PUBLIC WORKS 67.36 109353 1101 05/08/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 3/17- 4 /17COPY AREA 129.21 109353 1101 05/08/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 3/17- 4 /17ANNEX 119.86 109353 1101 05/08/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 3 /17- 4 /17POSTAGE AREA 159.56 109353 1101 05/08/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 BLACK TONER CARTRIDGES 438.00 TOTAL CHECK 913.99 109354 1101 05/08/02 2978 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO. 9204 PW FIRST AID SUPPLIES 48.31 109354 1101 05/08/02 2978 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO. 9204 CITY HALL FIRST AID SUPPL 51.26 109354 1101 05/08/02 2978 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO. 9204 SR CTR FIRST AID SUPPLIES 61.02 TOTAL CHECK 160.59 TOTAL FUND 26,924.30 TOTAL REPORT 26,924.30 { 'J f� RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:48 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 1,748.91 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 12,801.68 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 62.94 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 76.36 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 959.04 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,035.71 2201 CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 350.00 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 43.72 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 80.44 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 914.08 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 1,000.00 2605 GAS TAX 1,995.32 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 359.29 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 1,603.65 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 40.22 5000 LOCAL, TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 1,758.76 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 1,330.00 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 764.18 TOTAL REPORT 26,924.30 y� c ~ 7 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 15:54:51 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 109355 1101 05/15/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WEEK ENDED 4/19 -25 562.50 109356 1101 05/15/02 3131 ALBERT CHAVEZ, INC. 9632 ROCK FOUNTAIN LANDSCAPING 28,541.50 109357 1101 05/15/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9650 NEW LA AVE BRIDGE WIDENIN 5,052.00 109357 1101 05/15/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 LA AVE & SPRING RD WIDENI 3,525.00 109357 1101 05/15/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 WIDENING OF LOS ANGELES A 4,059.76 109357 1101 05/15/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 REIMBURSABLES - NOT TO EX 172.84 TOTAL CHECK 12,809.60 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 2 /02CITY ENG RETAI 2,085.76 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.020 -2/02 6717 ASPEN HI 102.20 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 3 /02TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 50,578.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 3 /02TOTAL BILLABLE FEES - 48,517.14 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.070- 2 /02NATIONAL READY 269.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.038- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 9,604.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.376- 2 /02PARDEE HOMES 1,743.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.035- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 1,617.25 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.031- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 184.18 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.011- 2 /02WEST COAST GEO 21.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.370- 2 /02MORRISON -SPEC 407.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 473.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.319- 2 /02SDI 899.41 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.313- 2 /02SDI 1,695.20 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.700- 2 /02MILLER U -TURN 12.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 2 /02ADELPHIA -WORLD 1,217.25 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.411 -2/02M ORLINO -SHAST 19.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.036- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 138.25 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.332- 2 /02CC &R -284 BARD 680.05 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.333- 2 /02TRI CITY MORTG 199.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.027- 2 /02RICE DEV -CONDO 53.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.051- 2 /02PEACH HILL LLC 3,480.43 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.055- 2 /02PEACH HILL LLC 1,874.75 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.214- 2 /02MPK PARTNERS 214.98 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.334- 2 /02TRI CITY MORTG 102.20 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.284- 2 /02JIN IND -5950 112.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9146 3 /02RESIDENT PERMITS 28,839.69 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.061 -2/02 10709 PIMLICO 30.10 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 5/02 NOTE PYMT - 12,720.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.039- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 620.55 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.430- 2 /02SCOTT & T HUST 19.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9144 3 /02PLAN CHECK NON RESIDE 563.29 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9143 3 /02PLAN CHECK RESIDENTIA 17,257.63 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9147 3 /02NON- RESIDENT PERMITS 1,856.53 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.341 -2/02G MOLINEUX 19.50 109359 �^i 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402- 2 /02CARD- SRV /GLUCK 349.00 109359 \ 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.032- 2 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 58.45 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 2 /02CITY ENG RETAI 347.62 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 2 /02CITY ENG RETAI 347.62 109359 t 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 2 /02TRAFFIC ENG RE 439.00 109359 ' 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 2 /02LA AVE EAST AL 38,928.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.420- 2 /02MILLER /PEACH U 1,311.00 109359 lr1 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.480- 2 /02GRIMES CYN STU 504.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 2 /02MILLER PKWY /TR 635.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.530- 2/02SR23 BYPASS LA 217.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.010- 2 /02PARDEE HOMES 25.50 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 16:38:55 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.030 -2/02 02 OVERLAY PR 269.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.040 -2/02 02 SLURRY SEA 3,095.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003- 2 /02ENCROACHMENT 11,749.50 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.246- 2 /02CNTRY CLUB EST 9,105.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.328- 2 /02LENNAR HOMES 68.25 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.314- 2 /02SDI 1,796.51 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 2 /02CYPRESS LAND 112.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.309- 2 /02WM LYON HOMES 1,243.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.375- 2 /02MORRISON -PARDE 8,568.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.377- 2 /02M0RRISON -PARDE 45,854.55 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.307- 2 /02LENNAR HOMES 411.75 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.308- 2 /02WM LYON HOMES 4,004.00 109359 1101 05/15/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.315- 2 /02SDI 16.50 TOTAL CHECK 195,212.81 109360 1101 05/15/02 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9285 SPACE #24 PURCHASE 13,300.00 109360 1101 05/15/02 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9285 SP #7 PURCHASE 12,500.00 109360 1101 05/15/02 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9102 SP #7 ESCROW CLOSING COST 425.00 109360 1101 05/15/02 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9102 SP #24 ESCROW CLOSING FEES 425.00 TOTAL CHECK 26,650.00 109361 1101 05/15/02 1129 CITY OF SIMI VALLEY 9102 1- 3 /02HHW EVENTS 8,793.18 109362 1101 05/15/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 XEROX PHASER 860N PRINTER 2,413.13 109363 1101 05/15/02 1167 D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED 9244 PLAYERS,COACHES JBA SHIRT 1,762.14 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 155.14 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9208 ADMIN STORAGE UNITS 871.89 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.67 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.37 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.79 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HOUSING /MRA OFFICE SUPPLI 16.27 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.64 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPP 27.86 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HOUSING /MRA OFFICE SUPPLI 18.40 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HOUSING MRA OFFICE SUPPLI 4.05 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 CITY CLERK KEYBOARD 317.45 1.09364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HR OFFICE SUPPLIES 132.15 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 HR KEYBOARD 320.68 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 PAPER SUPPLIES 57.89 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 622.58 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 PAPER SUPPLIES 144.73 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.66 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9201 TONER /COMPUTER SUPPLIES 65.98 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 129.49 109364 \ J 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 IS STOOL /STAND 470.88 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9501 ADMIN FILE CABINET 705.50 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PRKNG ENF OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.34 109364 ( 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.12 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9504 IS MEDIA CABINET 639.47 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.37 109364 V1 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.12 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 28.72 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES 144.73 109364 1101 05/15/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM SRVC OFFICE SUPPLIES 245.55 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 16:38:55 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 4,483.00 O1 PRKWY & MED RETENTION 3,733.50 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 TIERRA REJADA PARKWAY CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 8,816.60 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEM TOTAL CHECK 6,482.00 109365 GYMNASTICS CLASSES INSTRU 1101 05/15/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 2102 109365 228.90 1101 05/15/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 2102 109365 1101 05/15/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 2102 109365 EZ2 -4/02 INTERNET 1101 05/15/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 9640 109365 96.00 1101 05/15/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 9640 18.81 TOTAL CHECK 18.00 109366 1101 05/15/02 1765 HAWKS & ASSOCIATES INC 9601 109366 3 /02PARKS ALL FUELS 1101 05/15/02 1765 HAWKS & ASSOCIATES INC 9601 109366 1,830.48 1101 05/15/02 1765 HAWKS & ASSOCIATES INC 9601 4,830.00 TOTAL CHECK 390.60 4 /02METR0LINK SECURITY 109367 1101 05/15/02 1289 HUGG, JOHN A 9160 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109368 59.29 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9241 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 109368 3/27ORD 4279 FLOOD DAMAGE 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109368 ACCOUNTING 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109368 1101 05/15/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9221 TOTAL CHECK 109369 1101 05/15/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102 109370 1101 05/15/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9102 109370 1101 05/15/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9255 109370 1101 05/15/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9255 109370 1101 05/15/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9102 TOTAL CHECK 109371 1101 05/15/02 2874 MARTINEZ&AMADOR ARCHITECT 9630 109372 1101 05/15/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109373 1101 05/15/02 1501 SECURITY ABOVE 9102 109374 1101 05/15/02 2456 VENTURA COUNTY 2104 109374aa 1101 05/15/02 2456 VENTURA COUNTY 2104 C J TOTAL CHECK fj 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9630 1_09375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 922C 109375 // F 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9103 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9103 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 962C RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 16:38:55 PAGE 3 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 5,391.49 O1 PRKWY & MED RETENTION 4,483.00 O1 PRKWY & MED RETENTION 3,733.50 O1 PRKWY & MED RETENTION 100.10 TIERRA REJADA PARKWAY 250.00 2001 PARKWAY & MEDIAN LAN 250.00 8,816.60 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEM 1,580.00 AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEM 3,322.00 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEM 1,580.00 6,482.00 GYMNASTICS CLASSES INSTRU 1,534.61 OES TRAINING - CHUDOBA 450.00 FUN EXPRESS -EMP RECOGNITI 228.90 BADUCCOS -ORAL BOARD LUNCH 47.56 MARMALADE CAFE -MAYOR HUNT 32.01 LA TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 252.20 FROMINS OF ENCINO- ACM,ATT 27.14 EZ2 -4/02 INTERNET 45.00 BAUDUCCOS -ORAL BOARD LUNC 45.14 VENTURA CTY STAR SUBSCRIP 96.00 HUDSON GRILL -MRA RECRUITM 20.44 TR GOLF CLUB- GILBERT,RILE 18.81 AMERICAN PW DUES 18.00 1,281.20 #32 CITY BUS REPAIRS 750.51 3 /02CITY BUSSES FUEL 1,672.41 3 /02PARKS ALL FUELS 22.50 4 /02PW OFF RD RED DIESEL 23.25 4 /02CITY BUSSES FUEL 1,830.48 3,548.64 9 /8 /01- 4 /5 /02AQUATIC FACI 4,830.00 5 /1CC MTG AGENDA PACKETS 390.60 4 /02METR0LINK SECURITY 2,164.80 98- 01PASSTHROUGH TAXES 171,820.85 98- OIPASSTHROUGH TAXERS 447,332.17 619,153.02 3/22P00L BIDDERS PRE -QUAL 157.08 3 /13ORD #278 WIRELESS FAC 59.29 3 /13ORD #279 FLOOD DAMAGE 32.34 3 /15PUB HEAR - ASADURIAN IN 100.10 3 /4PUB HEARING - COLMER DEV 111.65 3 /29PUB HEAR- ZELMAN RETAI 99.33 3/27ORD 4279 FLOOD DAMAGE 43.12 3/22,27 -AVCP RR PROJ BIDS 269.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9220 3 /30RD 4278 WIRELESS FAC 109375 1101 05/15/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 3 /21PUB HEAR -REZA YASSINI TOTAL CHECK 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /6- 4 /9COUNTRY TRAIL 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /6- 4 /9TIERRA REJADA 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/6- 4 /9ZONE 10 WATER 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/6- 4 /9MTN MEADOWS 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /6- 4 /9AVRC & GYM 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/6- 4 /9ZONE 5 WATER 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/6- 4 /9ZONE 8 WATER 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/6- 4 /9ZONE 4 WATER 109376 1101 05/15/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /6- 4 /9PRKWYS & MEDIANS TOTAL CHECK 109377 1101 05/15/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 4 /02GRAPHIC /BBS SRVCS 109377 1101 05/15/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9504 50% VIDEO PROD REFURBISHM 109377 1101 05/15/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 4 /02CC MTGS EQUIP RENTAL 109377 1101 05/15/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 4 /02CONTRACT VIDEO PRODUC TOTAL CHECK 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 GRIFFIN PRK TREE TRIMMING 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 VIRGINIA PRK TREE TRIMMIN 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 ZONE 10 TREE TRIMMING 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 COM CTR PRK TREE TRIMMING 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 PEACH HILL PRK TREE TRIMM 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CMPS CYN PRK TREE TRIMMIN 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CAMPUS PRK TREE TRIMMING 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 MONTE VISTA PRK TREE TRIM 109378 1101 05/15/02 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING TOTAL CHECK TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT r"y f� c� t� PAGE 4 AMOUNT 38.50 107.03 1,017.94 3,102.35 2,174.60 9,938.61 3,344.94 331.42 746.05 466.54 91.36 814.51 21,010.38 636.00 6,000.00 1,500.00 2,122.00 10,258.00 3,783.00 2,381.43 585.00 374.64 975.00 858.00 468.00 2,589.15 975.00 293.28 13,282.50 976,657.15 976,657.15 RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 16:38:55 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 05/07/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 1,593.35 1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 19,670.82 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 2.34 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 2,176.50 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 269.50 2151 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 28,541.50 2153 MUNICIPAL POOL 4,987.08 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 66,073.62 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 3,589.32 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 4,733.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 91.36 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 746.05 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE B 466.54 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 10,313.25 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 19,208.96 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 60,623.60 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. - 12,720.00 2603 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A 3,365.00 2605 GAS TAX 41.25 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 26,688.72 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 173,476.29 3900 MRA AREA 1 DEBT SERVICE 447,332.17 4003 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN 2,413.13 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 6,418.20 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 8,793.18 6005 UW /CCB TR4340,1,2,3 &4792 214.98 6026 SDI 4,407.62 6044 COLMER, WAYNE 111.65 6193 CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR 411.75 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 12,696.18 6302 FELSENTHAL, JERROLD S. 112.00 6360 ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL 1,081.35 6364 RICE 53.00 6375 PEACH HILL :,LC /CREATIVE W 5,355.18 6385 RICHMOND AM. H 68.25 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI 9,105.00 6431 CARDSERVICE 349.00 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 112.00 6476 SUMMIT FARMS 19.50 6489 NATIONAL READY MIX 269.50 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 99.33 6517 COFFEE GRINDER 107.03 6546 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 5,247.00 6548 PARDEE CONSTRUCTION 56,573.05 6903 CHEESMAN CONSTRUCTION 30.10 6906 GRAHAM MOLINEUX 19.50 6908 ADELPHIA 1,217.25 6910 HOWSEMAN 102.20 TOTAL REPORT 976,657.15 t � W RUN DATE 05/07/02 TIME 16:38:59 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council €TEM I I * E'S., - — C5-- 7t5--- Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk May 6, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/15/02) SUBJECT: Consider Second Addendum to Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Service Employees International Union AFL -CIO, CLC Local 998 Pertaining to July 3 or July 5 and December 31 Holidays BACKGROUND On September 5, 2001, the City Council approved a revised Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) ending June 30, 2004, with Service Employees International Union AFL -CIO, CLC Local 998. At the December 19, 2001 regular meeting, the City Council approved an addendum to the MOA to add a December 31 holiday when this date falls on a Monday. DISCUSSION A Second Addendum is now proposed to revise the language pertaining to a December 31 holiday and to add July 3 (when this date falls on a Monday) and July 5 (when this date falls on a Friday) holiday language (see legislative format language in attachment) . The attached Second Addendum to the MOA incorporates revisions to Section 1101 (Paid Assigned Holidays), Section 1102 (Work on Holidays) and Section 1103 (Holiday Policy for Regular Part -Time Employees) of the MOA. The Local 998 Union has submitted a letter of support for the amendments (see attachment). Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the Second Addendum to the MOA and authorize the City Manager to sign the amendment, with the final language to be approved by the City Manager. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to approve the Second Addendum to the MOA with the final language to be approved by the City Manager. Attachment: Draft Second Addendum to MOA vv�,v SECOND ADDENDUM TO SEPTEMBER 2001 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL -CIO, CLC, LOCAL 998, AND CITY OF MOORPARK THIS ADDENDUM, made and entered into this _ day of May, 2002, by and between Service Employees International Union AFL - CIO, CLC, Local 998 ( "Local 998 ") and the City of Moorpark ( "City "), a Municipal corporation, located in the County of Ventura, State of California, which is entered into with reference to the following recitals. RECITALS WHEREAS, Local 998 entered into a revised Memorandum of Agreement ( "MOA ") with the City, effective from date of ratification by both the employees and the City Council in September 2001 up to and including Midnight, June 30, 2004; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2001, the City Council authorized the City Manager to approve an amendment to the MOA to incorporate revisions to Section 1101, Paid Assigned Holidays, to add a December 31 holiday, consistent with Attachment 1 to this Addendum; and WHEREAS, on May 2002, the City Council authorized the City Manager to approve an amendment to the MOA to incorporate additional revisions to Section 1101, Paid Assigned Holidays, to revise the language for the December 31 holiday and add a holiday that would fall on either July 3 or July 5, consistent with the language in Attachment 1 to this Second Addendum. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS, BENEFITS AND PREMISES CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS TO THE MOA: The MOA between Local 998 and the City shall be amended consistent with Attachment 1 to this Addendum, which attachment shows with legislative format (left margin line and underlining) the language revised in the MOA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to the MOA between Local 998 and the City to be executed the day and year first above written. Second Addendum to 2001 MOA between Local 998 and City of Moorpark Page 2 ON BEHALF OF THE CITY: Steven Kueny, City Manager ATTEST: ON BEHALF OF LOCAL 998: Robert Vodka, Chief Spokesperson Deborah S. Traffenstedt Barry Hammitt, Executive City Clerk Director John Casillas, President Moorpark Chapter Local 998 Teresa Jones, Local 998 Unit Representative Mario Riley, Local 998 Elected Negotiator Attachment 1: Revisions to MOA shown with legislative format (new language identified by left margin line and underlining) 04 Second Addendum to 2001 MOA between Local 998 and City of Moorpark Page 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Sec. 1101 PAID ASSIGNED HOLIDAYS: 1. New Year's Day, January 1; 2. Martin Luther King's Birthday, the third Monday in January; 3. President's Day, the third Monday in February; 4. Cesar Chavez day, March 31, as follows: a) If March 31 falls on a Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday, then the holiday will be observed on Monday; b) If March 31 falls on a Thursday, Friday, or Saturday, then the holiday will be observed on Friday. 5. Memorial Day, the last Monday in May; 6. July 4 and either July 3 or July_ 5 as follows: a) July 3 - Eight hours i" `his date falls o: Monday; b) July 5 - Eight hours if this date =ails on a Friday; 7. Labor Day, the first Monday in September; 8. Veteran's Day, November 11; 9. Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November; 10. The day after Thanksgiving; 11. Christmas Day, December 25; 12. Christmas Eve (December 24) as follows: a) Four hours if this date falls on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday; b) Eight hours if this date falls on Monday; c) No hours if this date falls on Saturday or Sunday. 13. December 31 as follows: Eight hours if this date falls on a Monday. 14. And every day appointed by the President of the United States or Governor of this State for public feast, Thanksgiving or holiday, when specifically authorized by the City Council. Except numbers 6.a. (July 3) and 6.b. (July 5), 12. (December 24), 13. (December 31), or 14., above, if a paid assigned holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be the holiday in lieu of the day observed. Except numbers 6.a. (July 3) and 6.b. Second Addendum to 2001 MOA between Local 998 and City of Moorpark Page 4 (July 5) , 12. (December 24), 13. (December 31), or 14., above, if a paid assigned holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be the holiday in lieu of the day observed. For those employees regularly scheduled to work Saturday and /or Sunday, the paid assigned holiday shall be the day on which the holiday actually occurs. The July 3, July 5 and December 31 holidays are subject to the revised ho1id �y pay _language in Sections 1102 and 1103. Sec. 1102 WORK ON HOLIDAYS: Full -time employees who are required to work on a paid assigned holiday shall, in addition to receiving straight time, not to exceed eight (8) hours per holiday, be paid in cash at one and one -half their then regular rate of pay for hours actually worked, up to eight (8) hours, not to exceed eight (8) hours per holiday. Any time worked in excess of eight (8) hours on a paid assigned holiday shall be paid in cash at two and one -half (2 1-�) times their then regular rate of pay. Any full -time employee, whose regularly scheduled day off falls on a paid assigned holiday and who is not required to work on said holiday, shall be credited with eight (8) vacation leave hours for each such holiday. Full -time employees required to work on the Cesar Chavez, July 3, July 5, or December 31 holidays shall receive straight -time pay, not to exceed eight (8) hours, and shall also be credited with one hour of vacation leave for each hour worked on Cesar- Chavez the referenced holidays, not to exceed eight (8) hours. Any hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours on the Cesar Chavez, July 3, July 5,_and December 31 . _ .................. _ . holidays shall be paid in cash at two and one -half (2 times the employee's regular rate of pay. Sec. 1103 HOLIDAY POLICY FOR REGULAR PART -TIME EMPLOYEES: Employees whose regular schedule is less than full time shall receive holiday credit on a pro rata basis, receiving pay or vacation based on their regular scheduled hours for the fiscal year. Regular part -time employees required to work on the Cesar Chavez, July 3, July 5, and December 31 holidays Second Addendum to 2001 MOA between Local 998 and City of Moorpark Page 5 shall receive straight -time pay for hours worked and shall receive pro -rated vacation leave as credit for the holiday, consistent with applicable provisions in the Personnel Rules. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM i - - -- TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services? DATE: May 2, 2002 SUBJECT: Consider Park Rental Fee Waiver for Ventura County Special Olympics DISCUSSION The City Council is being asked to waive park rental fees for the Ventura County Special Olympics Organization. They plan to hold their season -end picnic for East County participants at Mountain Meadows Park on Saturday, May 25. Their event will be held from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. The typical fee for this rental would be $30. In the past, the Council has waived park rental fees for Moorpark youth sports organizations, Kiwains, and the Moorpark Tennis Club, less any additional staff time or utilities. In the case of the Special Olympics' request, there will be no need for staff or utilities. Additionally, staff sees a community benefit to ensuring Ventura County Special Olympics' presence in Moorpark. Over the past year, the City has been working jointly with Special Olympics to provide park facilities to hold athletic practices and games. Assisting the organization by providing a location to hold their annual picnic is seen as an extension of our cooperative relationship. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Ventura County Special Olympics' request for a park rental fee waiver request. \\mor _pri_serv\ home— folders\MLindlcy\Recrcation \Special Olympics Fee waiver ccagda.doc eJ • � .*�. n. � may-• MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM- I I* Do !A A( TO: Honorable City Council J j FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Direc"9%Y DATE: April 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/15/02) SUBJECT: Consider Quarterly Treasurer's Report SUMMARY The Quarterly Treasurer's Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002 is submitted, as required by Government Code and Moorpark Municipal Code. DISCUSSION For the quarter ended March 31, falling interest rates are the most noteworthy. Interest rates have continued to fall, reducing earnings. LAIF averaged 2.96% for the quarter. Investments outside of LAIF, including US Treasury and Agency instruments, are still generally posting better yields. As is typical for this time of year, cash is reduced to fund normal expenses in the first quarter, while waiting for property taxes to be received in April. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Quarterly Treasurer's Report. City of Moorpark Treasurer's Report For Quarter Ended March 31, 2002 Fiscal Year 2001 -02 t� 'v �a f� i) City of Moorpark Treasurer's Report For the quarter ended March 31, 2002 With comparison to the quarter ended December 31, 2001 Moorpark City of Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Book Book Value % Value % Unrestricted Cash: General account $ 809,849.07 Petty cash 1,100.00 $ 107,320.62 Combined Total Combined Total December 31, 2001 Book Book Value % Value Change Schedule 1 $ 917,169.69 $ 2,249,732.36 $ (1,332,562.67) 1,100.00 1,100.00 918,269.69 2,250,832.36 (1,332,562.67) Restricted Cash: Cash with fiscal agent 1,926,927.63 1,926,927.63 1,756,961.17 169,966.46 - 1,926,927.63 1,926,927.63 1,756,961.17 169,966.46 Total Cash 810,949.07 2,034,248.25 2,845,197.32 4,007,793.53 (1,162,596.21) Investment Portfolio: Local Agency Investment Fund 31,943,147.61 78% 17,113,804.44 100% 49,056,952.05 84% 47,106,952.05 80% 1,950,000.00 US Treasurys /Agencies 9,020,682.20 22% 0% 9,020,682.20 16% 12,010,585.62 20% (2,989,903.42) Common Stock - 0% 3,328.00 0.02% 3,328.00 0.01% 3,328.00 0.01% Total Investments 40,963,829.81 100% 17,117,132.44 100% 58,080,962.25 100% 59,120,865.67 100% (1,039,903.42) Total Cash /Cash Equivalents $ 41,774,778.88 $ 19,151,380.69 $ 60,926,159.57 $ 63,128,659.20 $ (2,202,499.63) Total Demand Investments $ 31,943,147.61 78% $ 17,113,804.44 100% $ 49,056,952.05 84% $ 47,106,952.05 80% In compliance with the California Governmental Code Section 53646, the Treasurer of the City of Moorpark hereby certifies that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's budgeted expenditure requirements for the next six months. This investment report conforms with the City of Moorpark's current Investment Policy approved by the City Council on October 17, 2001. e pectfully submitted, Dana Shigley, Treasurer 03 -31 -02 Investment Report 4/25/2002 Page 1 of 3 City of Moorpark Investment Portfolio Quarter ended March 31, 2002 Schedule 2 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency LAIF State of California CS Walt Disney Company Grand Total n/a Demand 2.96% 2.96% $17,113.804.44 $ 17,113,804.44 $ 17,113,804.44 $ 130,122.06 $ 130,122.06 133 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,328.00 3,062.99 - $ 17,113,804.44 $ 17,117,132.44 $ 17,116,867.43 $ 130,122.06 $ 130,122.06 The investment portfolio conforms with the City of Moorpark's Investment Policy adopted by the City Council on October 17, 2001 and meets the "prudent investor' requirement. f dD 03 -31 -02 Investment Report 4/30/2002 Page 2 of 3 Quarter ended Interest March 31, 2002 Received/ Purchase Maturity Days to Premium Book Market Accrued Amortized Type Issuer Shares Date Date Maturity Rate Yield Par (Discount) Cost Value Value Interest This Quarter City of Moorpark LAIF State of California n/a Demand 2.96% 2.96% $31,943,147.61 $ 31,943,147.61 $ 31,943,147.61 $ 220,515.69 $ 234,833.06 US US Treasury Note 15 -Jun -01 31 -Jan -03 595 4.75% 3.887% $ 3,000,000 $ 40,312.50 3.040,312.50 3,020,682.20 3,054,390.00 65,045.34 US US Treasury Bill @ Discount 15 -Jun -01 28 -Feb-02 258 n/a 3.342% 3,000,000 (69,230.00) 2,930,770.00 16,301.24 US Freddie Mac U MT Note 24-Oct-01 24 -Jan -02 92 3.205% 3.250% 3,000,000 3,000,000.00 24,037.50 US FHLB U Bond Callable 15 -Nov -01 15- Nov-04 1,096 4.00% 4.060% 3,000,000 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,970,000.00 30,000.00 - US FHLB Discount Note 24 -Jan -02 14 -Feb -02 21 n/a 1.644% 3,000,000 (2,835.00) 2,997,165.00 2,835.00 US FNMA Unsecd Notes Callable 14 -Feb -02 14 -Feb -05 1,096 4.23% 4290% 3,000,000 - 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,973,750.00 16,215.00 - Total US 17,968,247.50 9,020,682.20 8,998,140.00 46,215.00 108,219.08 Grand Total $ 49,911,395.11 $ 40,963,829.81 $ 40,941,287.61 $ 266,730.69 $ 343,052.14 US Treasudes/Agencies Market Value per Bank of America, NA Client Safekeeping Statement for quarter ended March 31, 2002. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency LAIF State of California CS Walt Disney Company Grand Total n/a Demand 2.96% 2.96% $17,113.804.44 $ 17,113,804.44 $ 17,113,804.44 $ 130,122.06 $ 130,122.06 133 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,328.00 3,062.99 - $ 17,113,804.44 $ 17,117,132.44 $ 17,116,867.43 $ 130,122.06 $ 130,122.06 The investment portfolio conforms with the City of Moorpark's Investment Policy adopted by the City Council on October 17, 2001 and meets the "prudent investor' requirement. f dD 03 -31 -02 Investment Report 4/30/2002 Page 2 of 3 C� f� C� City of Moorpark Investment Report Activity for Quarter ended March 31, 2002 General operating accounts are subject to Bank of America compensating balance requirements to offset banking activity charges. (1) Market value equals book value less "GIC's" $ 1,355,774 The "Guaranteed Insurance Contract" (GIC) represents the Debt Service Reserve for MRA 1999 Tax Allocation Bond issue. 03 -31 -02 Investment Report 4/25/2002 Page 3 of 3 Schedule 3 Moorpark Total City of Redevelopment Book Market Moorpark Agency Value Value General Operating Cash: Balance forward $904,198.65 $1,345,533.71 $ 2,249,732.36 Revenues 4,166,831.89 112,465.60 4,279,297.49 Expenditures 5,424,126.82 179,984.83 5,604,111.65 Revenues over expenditures (1,257,294.93) (67,519.23) (1,324,814.16) Other Revenues /Expenditures: LAW withdrawals 500,000.00 1,150,000.00 1,650,000.00 LAIF deposits (3,600,000.00) (3,600,000.00) Purchase US Treasury/Agencies (5,997,165.00) (5,997,165.00) Maturities US Treasury/Agencies 8,997,165.00 - 8,997,165.00 Bond proceeds - Transfers in /(out) 1,262,945.35 (2,320,693.86) (1,057,748.51) Total Other 1,162,945.35 (1,170,693.86) (7,748.51) Ending Balance $ 809,849.07 $ 107,320.62 $ 917,169.69 $ 917,169.69 Cash with Fiscal Agent: Balance forward $ - $1,756,961.17 $ 1,756,961.17 Interest earned 7,731.46 7,731.46 Bond proceeds 179,984.83 179,984.83 Transfers in - Revenues - 187,716.29 187,716.29 Disbursements 17,749.83 17,749.83 Debt service payments - - Expenditures - 17,749.83 17,749.83 Revenues over expenditures - 169,966.46 169,966.46 Ending Balance $ - $ 1,926,927.63 $ 1,926,927.63 (1) $ 571,153.63 Petty Cash: Balance forward $1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 Ending Balance $ 1,100.00 $ - $ 1,100.00 General operating accounts are subject to Bank of America compensating balance requirements to offset banking activity charges. (1) Market value equals book value less "GIC's" $ 1,355,774 The "Guaranteed Insurance Contract" (GIC) represents the Debt Service Reserve for MRA 1999 Tax Allocation Bond issue. 03 -31 -02 Investment Report 4/25/2002 Page 3 of 3 Schedule 3 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM- I I* E 0 A( �;✓'C`i �c' l� !gin �- r.. -- TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Servicesl42 DATE: May 2, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing Recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Construction of the AVCP Phase II Restroom Utility Project BACKGROUND The total project budget for the design and construction of the utility extension project for the AVCP Phase II restroom Facility is $124,364 and the work is being funded from the City's Park Improvement Fund - Community Zone. This phase of the project included the extension of water, sewer and electrical lines eastward in the park to the site of the future restroom/ storage /concession facility. On February 7, 2002, the City awarded the construction contract to J & H Engineering General Contractors, Inc. Construction of the utility extension has been completed pursuant to the approved plans and specifications, less "minor punch" list items. There was one approved Change Order, summarized as follows: Change Order #1 (Cost - Add $2,139): Add removal of unforeseen cement stabilized 12" base. Total Change Orders: $2,139 With the Council's authorization to record the Notice of Completion, the contractor will receive the balance of payment due 35 days after the recordation and fulfillment of all contractual obligations as determined by the City. \\mor _pri_scrv\ home _folders\MLindlcy\PARKS\Park Projects\AVCP Restrooms\RR Utilities Notice of Comp ccagda.doc Utility Extension Notice of Completion Page 2 STAFF RECONMNDATION Accept the work as complete; authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the project; and authorize the release of the balance of payment, due upon satisfactory clearance and thirty - five (35) days after Notice of Completion records and completion of close -out contractual obligations on the part of the contractor. ITEM- I I* po C .__.. . A c MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Direc or DATE: May 3, 2002 (meeting of May 15, 2002) SUBJECT: CONSIDER PURCHASE OF MICROSOFT OFFICE UPGRADES FOR ALL USERS BACKGROUND The city has approximately 70 computers operating Microsoft Office 97 software, which includes Word, Excel, Access and Powerpoint. These software packages are used extensively by staff and it is important that we maintain current versions of this software so that our files are compatible with the public and other agencies. At the end of this year, Microsoft will no longer support Office 97 and will not produce any software patches for it. Additionally, we plan to upgrade our operating system by the end of the year, posing possible software conflicts with this older package. DISCUSSON We had planned to include a request to upgrade Office 97 to Office XP in the 2002/2003 fiscal year budget. However, pricing for licenses is increasing June 1, and we could save $4,000 by purchasing the licenses before that date. The attached budget resolution amends the Information Systems budget to add $18,000. This would provide the funding for licenses for Office XP for all city users, and would include upgrades and patches for two years. The cost would be spread to all user departments. Honorable City Council May 3, 2002 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote Required) 1. Adopt Resolution 2002- amending the 2001/2002 fiscal year budget to provide $18,000 for the purchase of software upgrades. RESOLUTION 2002- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 2001/02 BUDGET BY ALLOCATING $18,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF SOFTWARE UPGRADES WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the budget for fiscal year 2001/02; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City Council requesting a budget amendment appropriating $18,000 for the purchase of upgraded Microsoft Office software; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A" hereof describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment appropriating $18,000 as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit "A" Budget Revision Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 EXHIBIT A Budget Revision A. Fund Allocation Fund No. I Fund Name Amount 0100 ICity Overhead Fund $18,000 B. Budget Appropriation: BUDGET NUMBER BUDGETED REVISION NEW BUDGET 0100- 5710 - 0000 -9205 $1,500 $18,000 $19,500 0100 -5710- 0000 -9298 $(22,400) $(18,000) $(40,400) C„.... ITEM 110 G fA ��f. -h=• !'C�` L - tom_ .�_ MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL C� AGENDA REPORT To: The Honorable City Council From: Kenneth Gilbert, Director of Public Works Date: May 3, 2002 (Council Meeting: 5/15/02) SUBJECT: Consider 1918 and Standards Index; 2) Name Signs DISCUSSION in Background Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2001 - Adopting Revised Engineering Policies and to Add Provisions Pertaining to 1) Traffic Use of Steel Plates; and 3) Advance Street On December 5, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001 -1918 approving revised Engineering Policies and Standards. Proposed Additional Language 1. Pavement Structural Section, Traffic Index & Subsurface Drainage: Language has been added to set forth design standards pertaining to the structural cross - section of asphalt pavement and the installation of sub - drainage systems for such improvements. These new standards include the required use of rubberized asphalt. This material not only diverts vehicle tires from land fills, it is also superior to non - rubberized asphalt in appearance, smoothness of ride, coefficients of friction and durability. The purpose of these standards is to assure that new streets are constructed in a manner which adequately provides for the longevity of those improvements. 2. Temporary Steel Plates Over Street Excavations: Language has been added pertaining to the temporary use of steel plates over street excavations. The purpose of this language is assure that such use meets minimum safety criteria. Eng_std_0202 C .-, ., /- "I-) ., ..., Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 2 3. Advance Street Name Signs: Language has been added to assure that street improvement plans include a requirement for the installation of advance street name signs, when such signs are needed. C. Resolution Attached as Exhibit 1 is a draft Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 2001 -1918 and approving a new set of Engineering Standards and Policies which includes the addition of "Sections N, 0 and P" pertaining to the matters discussed above. The proposed "new" language is set forth below as follows: "N. PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION, TRAFFIC INDEX & SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE: This standard pertains to the design and construction of the structural section and subdrain systems for public and private streets. 1. Criteria: Except as provided herein, the methods contained in the Caltrans Design Manual shall be used to design pavement sections and subsurface drainage for streets. Pavement structural sections for public streets shall be designed using Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) for a 50 -year term. Pavement structural sections for private streets shall be designed using Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) for a 20 -year term. The structural section of all public and private streets shall be founded on well- drained basement soils. The determination of the need for subsurface drainage systems to prevent saturation of the pavement structural section or underlying foundation materials shall consider conditions anticipated throughout the design life of all pavement structural sections. Subsurface drainage systems shall be marked with detectable underground utility marking tape buried 6 inches above the pipe. The ends of the marking tape shall be accessible at each surface feature of the subsurface drainage system. 2. Standards: Unless calculations to the contrary are approved by the City, the Traffic Indices shown in table N.2.A shall be used for public streets and the Traffic Indices shown in table N.2.13 shall be used for private streets. The wearing surface of all streets shall be 1.5 inches of rubberized asphalt, which shall not be included when computing the required structural section. Except as modified herein, the provisions of the Caltrans "Design Manual" relating to subsurface drainage shall be implemented in the design of all streets. Subsurface water drainage systems shall be designed for ease of maintenance, operation and locatability. Eng_std_0202 n 02' Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 3 3. Implementation: The City Engineer shall require the construction of street structural sections and subsurface drainage systems to conform to the design standards herein and the provisions of the Caltrans "Design Manual ". Construction materials and methods shall conform to the most recent edition of the "Standard Specification for Public Works Construction ". Geotechnical and hydrologic investigations to determine the physical characteristics of the soil and likelihood of subsurface water that may affect the pavement structural section shall be performed and documented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Materials: Except as provided herein, all materials and construction methods used in the construction of street structural sections, features and subsurface drainage systems shall conform to the latest edition of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ". Eng_std_0202 a. Pipe used for subsurface drains shall: 1) Be no less than 6 inches in diameter. 2) Be smooth - walled polyvinyl chloride pipe conforming to ASSHTO M278. 3) Have perforations located in the bottom half of collector pipes. 4) Have belled ends or sleeve or stop -type couplings per AASHTO M278. Solvent cementing of joints is not required. 5) When used for outlets, terminal risers, vertical and 45- degree risers, elbows, wyes and tees shall not be perforated. b. Permeable material used for backfilling trenches under, over and around subsurface drains shall 1) Consist of hard, durable, clean gravel, or crushed stone conforming to the quality requirements of table 200- 1.6(B) of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ". 2) Be free from organic material, clay balls, or other deleterious substances. 3) Conform to the gradation requirements of Table N.7.b. c. When permeable material type is not specified Type B permeable material shall be used. d. Filter fabric shall be type 180N. e. Detectable underground utility marking tape have a minimum 0.13 mm (0.005') overall thickness, with no less than a 35 gauge (AWG), 0.14 mm aluminum foil core. The foil must be visible from both sides. The layers shall be laminated together with the extrusion lamination V v v Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 4 process, not adhesives. No inks or printing shall extend to the edges of the tape. All printing shall be encased to avoid ink rub -off. The color - coding of the tape shall be green and the legend shall be "SEWER ". Detectable Underground Utility Marking Tape shall conform to the properties listed in Tables N.7.d. Detectable Underground Utility Marking Tape shall meet the requirements of each of the following agency /association publications. 1) Department of Transportation, Materials Transportation Bureau, Office of Pipeline Safety. USAS code for pressure piping B31.8, paragraph 192.321(e). 2) National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC, Special Study Prevention of Damage to Pipelines. Adopted June 7, 1974. Report NTSB- PSS -73 -1. 3) American Petroleum Institute (API). Recommended practice for marking buried liquid petroleum pipelines - APR RP 1109. 4) General Services Administration, Washington, DC, Public Buildings Service Guide Specification for Mechanical and Electrical Equipment - PBS 4 -1501, Amendment 2, Page 501 -14, Paragraph 18, Subparagraph 18.1, Clause 18.1.1. 5) Rural Electrification Authority (REA), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, National Electrical Safety Code for Underground Construction for remote and immediate hazards. TABLE N.2.A Traffic Indices for Public Streets Roadway Designation Maximum Build -out Average Daily Traffic 50 yr ESAL T. 1. B -4 Residential <10,000 171,375 7.5 B -3D Minor Commercial /Industrial 8,000 270,000 8.0 B -3C Commercial /Industrial 16,000 540,000 8.5 B -313 Major Commercial /Industrial 20,000 540,000 8.5 B -3A Secondary Arterial 20,000 540,000 8.5 B -2 Secondary Arterial 24,000 720,000 9.0 1 B -2 Primary Arterial 36,000 1,217,500 9.5 Eng_std_0202 Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 5 TABLE N.2.B Traffic Indices for Private Streets Roadway Designation Maximum Build -out 50 -mm 2" - -- 100 Average Daily Traffic 20 yr ESAL T.I. B -4 Residential 1,540 35,400 6.0 TABLE N.7.b PERMEABLE MATERIAL Sieve Sizes Percentage Passing Type A Type B 50 -mm 2" - -- 100 37.5 -mm 11/2" - -- 95 -100 19 -mm 3/4" 100 50 -100 12.5 -mm 1/2" 95 -100 - -- 9.5 -mm 3/8" 70 -100 15 -55 4.75 -mm (No. 4) 0 -55 0 -25 2.36 -mm (No. 8) 0 -10 0 -5 75-pm (no. 200) 0 -3 0 -3 TABLE N.7.d DETECTABLE UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKING TAPE PROPERTIES Property Method Value Thickness ASTM D2103 0114 mm 0.0056" Tensile strength ASTM D882 4500g /cm (25 Ibs /inch) (5,500 PSI Elongation ASTM D882 -88 <50 percent at break Printability ASTM D2578 >50 dynes/square centimeter Flexibility ASTM D671 -81 Pliable hand Inks Manufacturing specifications Heat -set M lex Message repeat Manufacturing specifications Every 500 mm 20" Foil Manufacturing specifications Dead soft/annealed To la er Manufacturing specifications Virgin PET Bottom layer Manufacturing specifications Virgin LDPE Adhesives Manufacturing specifications >30 percent, solid 1.5 #/R Bond strength Boiling H2O at 100 degrees Celsius Five hours without peel Colors APWA Code See Table 207 -25.1 B Eng_std_0202 Cn n. •r�.a �� Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 6 O. USE OF TEMPORARY STEEL PLATES OVER STREET EXCAVATIONS 1. Steel Plate Bridging: With a Non -Skid Surface. This standard covers the use of steel plate bridging. Persons conducting work within the public right -of -way shall not use steel plate bridging or trench plate that does not meet the requirements of this section both in application and circumstance of use. 2. Requirements for Use: Alternate construction methods that avoid the use of steel plate bridging shall be used by the persons conducting work within the public right -of -way unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. It is recognized that to accommodate excavation work, steel plate bridging may be necessary. All conditions for use of steel plate bridging set forth in the requirements of this standard must be fulfilled as conditions of approval of the use of steel plate bridging. Consideration of the use of steel plate bridging in the review process will take into account the following factors: a. Traffic volume and composition. b. Duration of use of the steel plate bridging. c. Size of the proposed excavation. d. Weather conditions. 3. Plate Score Formula: The following formula shall be used to score the permitted use of steel plate bridging: Eng_std_0202 PS= [ADT +EWL +D +10xWE +5xN +20xW +S kmh +Rx100]x L 1000 8 PS= [ADT +EWL +D +10xWE +5xN +20XW +S m h +Rx100]x L 1000 5 where: PS = plate score. ADT = average daily traffic as defined in the CALTRANS Traffic Manual. • EWL = equivalent wheel loads as defined in the CALTRANS Traffic Manual. • D = total number of 24 hour periods during which the plates will be utilized at the site being considered. • WE = total number of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays that the plates will be utilized at the site being considered. • N = total number of overnight periods that the plates will be in place, exclusive of Saturday, Sunday and holiday nights. n n. n rj+ Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 7 W = total number of 24 -hour periods that the plates will be utilized at the site being considered when the possibility of rain exceeds 40 percent. • S = the design speed in kilometers per hour or miles per hour, as applicable in the formulae above, of the street where the plates are to be installed. This number shall not be reduced for construction zone speed reductions. • R = the quotient of the vertical differential divided by the horizontal distance. The vertical and horizontal dimensions shall be measured at the locations spanning a distance of 15 m (50') up and downstream of the position of the proposed steel plate bridging. • L = the number of lanes where plates will be used. 4. Plate Score Use: When the computed value of the plate score exceeds 50, steel plate bridging shall not be used unless, and at the sole discretion of the City Engineer, it is determined that no alternative method of construction is possible in lieu of using steel plate bridging or that other overriding considerations make the use of steel plate bridging acceptable. Alternatives considered to bridging shall include, but not be limited to, detouring traffic, construction detour routes, tunneling, boring and other methods of trenchless construction. Unless specifically noted in the provisions of the City Engineer's approval, the use of steel plate bridging at each location so approved shall not exceed four (4) consecutive working days in any given week. 5. Additional Requirements: In all cases when the depth of the trench exceeds the width of the steel plate bridging resting on each side of the pavement adjacent to the trench, safety regulations require or the City Engineer determines that shoring is necessary to protect the health or safety of workers or the public. The persons conduction work within the public way shall install shoring conforming to Section 7- 10.4.1 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ( SSPWC). The trench shoring shall be designed and installed to support the steel plate bridging and traffic loads. All approvals for design, substitution of materials or methods shall be submitted by the persons conduction work within the public way in accordance with all provisions of section 2 -5.3 SSPWC Shop Drawings and Submittals. The Contractor shall backfill and resurface excavations in accordance with section 306 -1.5 SSPWC. 6. Installation: When backfilling operations of an excavation in the traveled way, whether transverse or longitudinal cannot be properly completed within a work day, steel plate bridging with a non -skid surface and shoring may be required to preserve unobstructed traffic flow. In such cases, the following conditions shall apply: Eng_std_0202 � A� •n n, F7 .1, Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 8 a. Steel plate bridging when the plate score exceeds 50 is not allowed except when, at the sole discretion of the City Engineer, it is approved as specified above. b. Steel plates used for bridging must extend no less than 610 mm (2') beyond the edges of the trench. c. Steel plate bridging shall be installed and maintained to operate with a noise level such that no sound generated by the steel plate can be heard by a person with normal hearing acuity from a distance of 15 meters (50'). d. No longitudinal trench excavation longer than 15 meters (50') shall be covered with steel plates. 7. Installation Methods: When the use of steel plate bridging and shoring is approved by the City Engineer, the persons conducting work within the public right -of -way shall install using either Method (1) or (2) depending on the design speed of the portion of street where the steel plate bridging is proposed for use. a. Method 1 For speeds equal to or more than 56 Km /hr (35 MPH)]: The pavement shall be cold planed to a depth equal to the thickness of the plate and to a width and length equal to the dimensions of the plate. The cold milling shall produce a flat surface that the plate shall rest on with no horizontal or vertical movement. Horizontal gaps between the unmilled pavement and the plate shall not exceed 25 mm (1 ") and shall be filled with elastomeric sealant material which may, at the contractor's option, be mixed with no more that 50 %, by volume, of Type I aggregate conforming to the requirements of tables 203- 5.2(B) and 203- 5.3(A) SSPWC . b. Method 2 [For speeds less than 56 Km /hr (35 MPH)]: Approach plate(s) and ending plate (if longitudinal placement) shall be attached to the roadway and shall be secured against displacement by using two adjustable cleats that are no more than 50 mm (2 ") shorter than the width of the trench. The cleats shall be bolted to the underside of each plate and located within 150 mm (6 ") of the beginning and end of the trench for plates at the beginning and end of the trench. A minimum of two 300 mm long by 19 mm diameter (12" x3/4") steel bolts shall be placed through the plate and driven into holes drilled 300 mm (12 ") into the pavement section, or other devices approved by the City Engineer. Subsequent plates shall be butted and tack welded to each other along 10% of the butted faces. Fine graded asphalt concrete shall be compacted to form ramps, maximum slope 8.5% with a minimum 300 mm (12 ") taper to cover all edges of the steel plates. When steel plates are removed, the dowel holes in the pavement section shall be completely filled with elastomeric sealant material. At the Contractor's option, the methods required for Method 1 may be Eng_std_0202 Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 9 used. If the use of Method 1 is elected, all requirements of Method 1 shall be used. The Contractor shall maintain the steel plates, shoring, and asphalt concrete ramps and maintain and restore the street surface during and after their use. 8. Materials: The minimum thickness of steel plate bridging shall be as shown in Table 0.7 TABLE 0.7 REQUIRED PLATE THICKNESS FOR A GIVEN TRENCH WIDTH Maximum Trench Width 1 Minimum Plate Thickness 0.3 m 10" 13 mm (1/2") 0.6 m 23" 19 mm 3/4" 0.8 m 31 " 22 mm 7/8" 1.0 m 41" 25 mm 1" 1.6 m 63" 32 mm 1 '/4" 9. Longer Spans: For spans greater than 1.6 m (6), a structural design shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval in accordance with section 2 -5.3 SSPWC of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 10. Design Criteria: Steel plate bridging shall be steel plate designed to support the HS20 -44 truck loading per CALTRANS Bridge Design Specifications Manual. The Contractor use steel plate with a non -skid surface having no less than a coefficient of friction of 0.35 as determined by California Test Method 342. In addition to all other required construction signing, the Contractor shall install Rough Road (W33) sign with black lettering on an orange background in advance of steel plate bridging. P. ADVANCE STREET NAME SIGNS: 1. Requirement: All signing and striping plans shall include requirements for the installation of advance street name signs, consistent with the requirements set forth herein. 2. Purpose: The purpose for such signs is to provide advance notice of the name of the streets the driver is approaching. Eng_std_0202 Engineering Standards May 3, 2002 Page 10 3. Location / Design: The location and design of all advance street name signs shall be determined by the City Engineer and shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and, if the sign is to be placed in a landscaped parkway or median to be maintained by the City, the Director of Community Services . 4. Monument Signs: A monument sign shall be used whenever possible. Pole signs may be used when the City Engineer determines that the use of a monument sign is inappropriate for a given application. 5. Medians: On streets with raised / landscaped medians, the preferred location for the sign is in the median. 6. Signalized Intersections: Advance street name signs shall not be required for signalized intersections which have overhead internally illuminated street name signs. " STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No 2002- Attachments: Exhibit 1: Resolution Eng_std_0202 In ; t> . f L RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -1918 AND ADOPTING REVISED ENGINEERING POLICIES AND STANDARDS ADDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC INDEX WHEREAS, on December 5, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001 -1918, adopting revised Engineering Policies and Standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to amend the Engineering Polices and Standards of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Resolution No. 2001 -1918 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 2. Any prior Resolution, or part thereof, rescinded and deleted by Resolution No. 2001 -1918 shall remain rescinded and deleted. SECTION 3. A new set of Engineering Policies and Standards, including provisions related to Traffic Index Standards, are hereby approved and adopted, said Policies and Standards being set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. ATTEST: Patrick Hunter, Mayor Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit 'A': Engineering Policies and Standards C 4 ,n r't Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 11 Date: May 3, 2002 Engineering Policies and Standards Table of Contents Section A Placement of Above Ground Structures in the Sidewalk B Public Notification of Street Projects C Grading D Utility Trench Backfill Requirements E Size of Speed Limit Signs F Traffic Control Plans G Street Improvements on a State Highway H Repair of Damaged Sidewalks, Curbs and Gutters I Rear Yard Access Through Block Walls J Street Improvement Plans: U -Turns K Second Driveways L Placement of Banners on Street Light Poles M Slough Walls N Pavement Structural Section, Traffic Index & Subsurface Drainage O Temporary Steel Plates Over Street Excavations P Advance Street Name Signs Page 2 2 3 10 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 14 15 18 22 Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 2] Date: May 3, 2002 A. PLACEMENT OF ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES IN THE SIDEWALK: The following guidelines shall be followed in determining the location of above ground structures in the sidewalk. Such structures include, but are not limited to, facilities owned by the City, any utility company or district, and the U.S. Postal Service. The location of such structures should be consistent with these guidelines unless unique circumstances require other action. In any case, the placement of such structures shall be consistent with minimum requirements for handicap access. 1. Whenever possible, traffic control signs should be placed on street light poles instead of separate sign poles. 2. Sidewalks having widths greater than five feet (6) and sidewalks with parkways: a. All signs, poles, mailboxes, etc. should be placed behind the curb with the minimum setback. b. Fire hydrants shall be placed five feet (5') from the curb face. 3. Sidewalks having a width of five feet (6) or less: a. All stop signs, yield signs, turn prohibition signs, large guide signs, traffic signal poles and similar traffic signs shall be placed behind the curb with the minimum setback. b. Except as noted in Item #1 above, all other traffic control and traffic warning signs shall be placed behind the sidewalk, provided adequate visibility is maintained. Parking restriction signs placed behind the sidewalk may require placement at shorter intervals. c. Mailboxes may be placed behind the curb with the minimum setback, provided additional sidewalk width is constructed sufficient to provide a sidewalk width consistent with the width of the sidewalk adjacent to the mailbox. d. All other facilities shall be placed behind the sidewalk. B. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF STREET PROJECTS: When deemed necessary and appropriate, City staff shall provide those affected with written notice of the City's intent to construct a street improvement project. Such notice shall only be given when and if the City Engineer and /or Public Works Director determine that a given project could adversely impact certain properties. When given, such notice shall be mailed to the owners and /or residents of properties which could be adversely affected by the project. Any such notice shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the date the City Council is scheduled to consider the approval of the plans and specifications for such project and /or authorization to advertise for receipt of bids for the construction of such project. C ., ., Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 31 Date: May 3, 2002 C. GRADING: The following guidelines shall be followed by the City Engineering Department in the review and approval of grading plans and the administration of grading operations: 1. Conceptual Grading Plans: On all tentative tract maps, parcel maps, and applications for land development where grading quantities will be equal to or greater than fifty cubic yards (50 cu. yds.), obstruct a drainage course or impact another property owner's property, a conceptual grading plan shall be a part of the submittal to the City. The conceptual grading plan shall show pad elevations, tops and toes of slopes and walls, borrow and fill quantities, and the general drainage pattern. The location of any anticipated siltation, retention or debris basins shall be shown. As a condition of approval, surety shall be provided for the full cost of the grading operations. On projects where the grading quantities do not exceed twenty thousand cubic yards (20,000 cu. yds.) and where all grading is in an isolated self contained area (such as agricultural land) and where the actual limits of proposed grading will have a significant buffer from and have no drainage impact to adjacent properties, and the grading creates no adverse aesthetic impacts to views or hillsides, the City Engineer in consultation with the Director of Community Development after review of a plot plan and supporting information concerning drainage and buffer areas, may determine that a grading plan is unnecessary. 2. Contour Grading: a. Findings: The Council hereby finds that the terrain of certain areas of the City provides a unique and substantial character to the area and forms an integral part of the City's total environment. Due to their physical dominance on the City's landscape, development of the hillside areas will definitely affect the visual and environmental character of the community. The City's primary objective regarding hillside development is to preserve the natural terrain and aesthetic character of the City while encouraging creative, innovative, and safe residential development with a variety of housing types. Such characteristics will only be achieved when special consideration is given to those developments, subdivisions, and lot splits within hillside areas, on an individual basis and proper consideration of the variations in conditions, design criteria, and other factors. All contour grading shall be in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 17.38 Hillside Management of the Moorpark Municipal Code. b. Slope Design Standards: Where the creation of cut and fill slopes is approved, they shall be rounded at the edges and contoured as V v L Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 4] Date: May 3, 2002 necessary to blend with existing topography. All cut and fill slopes shall conform to the following standards: 1) All cut and fill slopes in excess of five feet (5') vertical height shall be rounded with vertical curves from the crest of the slope and from any surface drains constructed on the face or top of the slope and must keep concentrated water from roofs, drives or pads from going over slopes or onto adjacent properties; 2) Where cut or fill slopes intersect the ends of each graded slope, the slope shall be horizontally rounded and blended with a minimum radius of twenty -five feet (25'). A smaller radius may be permissible for short slope lengths; 3) Where a cut or fill slope intersects a natural slope, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved so as to blend with the natural slope; 4) Where any cut or fill slope exceeds seventy feet (27') in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous undulating fashion with radii no greater than three hundred feet (300') nor less than twenty feet (20'); 5) Slope rounding shall be designed in proportion to the total height of the slope. The top and toe of each slope in excess of ten feet (10') height, excepting the toe of any slope within twenty -five feet (25') of a dwelling, shall be vertically rounded with radii equal to one -fifth of the height of the slope and no less than five feet (6). This shall not apply to the toe of any cut slope that is supported by a retaining wall; 6) All engineered slopes shall be contour graded to achieve a natural appearance. Borders of cut slopes and fills are to be rounded to blend with the existing terrain; 7) Road and utility construction will not be approved until improvement plans have been approved for the area in accordance with discretionary approvals and City standards; and 8) Slope height shall be measured to the intersection of the slant of the slope with existing ground before rounding. c. Architectural Treatment: Architectural innovation shall be utilized rather than extensive grading so that the natural landform is disturbed to the least extent possible. d. Development Area Interfaces: Where approved by the Planning Commission or City Council, the slope grading requirements may be applied to limited portions of an adjacent zone to permit the extension or transition of a logical design concept. These requirements do not preclude satisfying requirements for slope benching, drainage facilities, and maintenance access or fire apparatus access roads. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 5] Date: May 3, 2002 e. Development Guidelines for Natural Slopes: Areas within the following ranges of natural (pre - development) slope percentages shall be developed in accordance with the following criteria: 1) The "Percent Natural Slope" on a site will be calculated as the average gradient of the entire site as determined by the elevation differentials measured orthographically between each node of a north -south and east -west one hundred foot interval grid extending over the entire developed portion of the project site. 2) Areas having an average slope of less than ten percent (10 %) [10' horizontal to 1' vertical) are not a hillside condition. Mass grading with conventional fully padded lots and terracing are acceptable. 3) Areas having an average slope of between ten percent (10 %) [10' horizontal to 1' vertical] and nineteen and nine -tenth percent (19.9 %) [5' horizontal to 1' vertical]: Mass grading may occur in this slope zone. Existing landforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted on these slopes, but split -level architectural structures with stacking and clustering are preferred. A cut and fill map is required to verify maximum heights of cut and fill. 4) Areas having an average slope of between twenty percent (20 %) [5' horizontal to 1' vertical] and thirty -three percent (33 %) [3' horizontal to 1' vertical]: Special hillside architectural and design techniques are required within this slope zone. Architectural designs are to conform to the natural landform. Mass grading is discouraged except on a case -by -case basis as permitted by the Planning Commission. Mass grading is particularly discouraged where development is proposed within a high -risk landslide area. This does not preclude grading necessary to mitigate slide hazards. A cut and fill map is required to verify maximum heights of cut and fill. 5) A Conditional Use permit is required for grading on areas having an average slope of thirty -four percent (34 %) or more [greater than 3' horizontal to 1' vertical). Approval of any Conditional Use permit for development within this slope zone is contingent that the Planning Commission make findings that such grading and development: a) Has been clearly demonstrated to minimize safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts. b) Includes the minimum amount of grading. c) Includes the grading necessary to mitigate slope instability or slide hazards that may exist on the site. d) Has had thorough geotechnical investigation. e) Has had a detailed grading plan prepared as well as a cut and fill exhibit that shows maximum heights of cut and fill. f) Will require no import or export of soils. ela. —�.. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 6] Date: May 3, 2002 3. Import/Export: On all required conceptual grading plans where the total on -site borrow and fill yardages differ by one thousand cubic yards (1,000 cu. yds.) or more, plans for handling the import/export shall be part of the conceptual grading plan. a. The import/export plan shall show quantity of import/export, location of borrow /stockpile sites, temporary and final grading of the site, height of fill /depth of cut, visibility of the site from public roads and lands, vegetation and screening for sites located within the City of Moorpark. b. Unanticipated off -site import/export operations requiring an excess of one thousand (1,000) total truck loads or ten thousand cubic yards (10,000 cu. yds.), whichever is less, shall require Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route shall be submitted to the City Council for review and approval. c. If the borrow /fill site(s) are within the City limits, a grading plan for such sites, showing the before and after condition, shall also be shown. 4. Stockpiles: The temporary placement of soil on any property prior to its placement as imported certified fill (herein "Stockpile "), shall comply with the following requirements: a. Design: All Stockpile shall: 1) not exceed five feet (5') in height; 2) have side slopes which do not exceed 3:1 b. Approval: 1) Development Entitlement: For any property having an approved development entitlement (CPD, IPD, RPD), requests for placement of a Stockpile are to be reviewed and conditionally approved, or denied, by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development as a discretionary action. The conditions and requirements for any approval of a Stockpile shall be consistent with an approved grading plan for the property and the conditions of approval for the development entitlement. Such approval shall also require the deposit of adequate and appropriate bonds to guarantee the removal of the Stockpile within the prescribed time limits of subsection 4c. In addition, the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development shall require appropriate conditions relative to the placement and maintenance of the Stockpile, including but not limited to: a) distance and screening from public rights -of -way and adjacent properties, with fencing or landscaping as determined necessary; b) erosion control; c) weed abatement; n nn,� �v ,, J Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 7] Date: May 3, 2002 d) construction of public improvements as required by the conditions of approval of the development entitlement, if said public improvements are determined to be needed at the time the Stockpile approval is requested; and, e) payment of applicable fees for processing of the request for the placement of the Stockpile(s). The quantity of soil for any approved Stockpile(s) being placed upon any such approved property or project, shall not exceed 5,000 cubic yards per acre, unless prior approval of a greater amount is granted by the City Council. 2) All Other Properties: For any property which has not been granted a development entitlement (including any property located within any One Hundred (100) Year Flood Boundary as shown on the current Flood Insurance Rate Map [FIRM]), requests for a Stockpile shall require approval by the City Council. Any application for such approval shall be accompanied by an adequate and appropriate Environmental Document assessing and addressing any potential environmental impacts associated with the placement and removal of the Stockpile. Such application shall be accompanied by appropriate conditions of approval as recommended by the City Engineer, including a requirement for the deposit of bonds to guarantee the removal of the Stockpile site(s) if deemed necessary. c. Duration: The duration of the placement of a Stockpile shall not exceed the following time limits: 1) Development Entitlements: For any property having an approved development entitlement, the duration of the placement of any Stockpile shall not exceed the time limits specified in said entitlement or two years whichever is less. 2) All Other Properties: For any other Stockpile approved by the City Council [see subsection 4.b.2], the duration of the placement of any Stockpile shall not exceed the time limits set forth in the conditions of approval as determined by the City Council. 5. Haul Routes: On all required conceptual grading plans that require import/export of more than one hundred (100) truckloads or one thousand cubic yards (1,000 cu. yds.), whichever is less, the following information shall be made a part of the conceptual grading plan: haul routes, hours of hauling, numbers and frequency of trucks and other information necessary to define hauling impacts. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of streets used as haul routes may be required as determined by the City Engineer. C Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 8] Date: May 3, 2002 6. Director of Community Development Review: On all grading plans, the Director of Community Development shall provide comment to the City Engineer concerning: contour grading, aesthetics, viewshed and consistency with the Hillside Management Ordinance where applicable and Moorpark General Plan. With said comments, the City Engineer shall develop and provide to the Director of Community Development, appropriate recommendations relative to those matters plus slope stability, drainage, erosion protection and related issues, before approval of any conceptual or final grading plan. 7. Final Grading Plan: The final grading plan shall be in substantial compliance with the approved conceptual grading plan. The City Engineer and the Director of Community Development shall make the determination as to substantial compliance with the approved conceptual grading plan. The City Engineer may administratively approve minor changes from the conceptual grading plan. Minor changes are defined as: a. changes in elevation of five (5) feet or less from the conceptual plan; b. changes in total borrow /fill quantities which do not exceed one thousand cubic yards (1,000 yd3); c. additional import/export quantities not exceeding one thousand cubic yards (1,000 yd3); d. changes which cause no adverse impacts to slope stability, drainage, and erosion control; and, e. changes which, in the view of the Director of Community Development, do not result in any adverse impact on aesthetics or viewshed. If the City Engineer finds that the final grading plan is not in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan, the City Engineer shall submit a report with recommendations to the City Council. The City Engineer shall not issue a grading permit for those final grading plans that are not in substantial conformance with the conceptual grading plan without approval of the City Council. 8. Erosion Control: Concurrent with submittal of the final grading plan, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for erosion control to be implemented on all graded areas. These measures shall apply to temporary grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days or for a period of time which extends into the wet season defined as that period between October 15th of a given year and April 15th of the following year. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 9] Date: May 3, 2002 9. National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES): As part of each final grading plan, NPDES regulations shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. As a minimum the following shall be included: a. A Stormwater Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS063339. b. The project construction plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval of the City Engineer. If the site is 5 acres or more in size, the following items shall also be included: c. A permit shall be obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board. A Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be submitted to the City Engineer and to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit No. CASO00002. d. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and approved by the City Engineer consistent with the requirements of the City's Stormwater Quality standards and regulations. 10. Dust Control: Dust control measures shall be identified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These measures shall include, but not be limited to, minimization of ground disturbance, application of water /chemicals, temporary/permanent ground cover /seeding, street sweeping, and covering loads of dirt. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall cease during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). 11. Field Changes: During grading operations, changes to the approved final grading plan may be authorized by the City Engineer, when such changes are in conformance with the approved Final Grading Plan and result in an "equal to" or "improved" final graded condition, provided the Director of Community Development concurs that the changes do not result in any adverse impact to aesthetics or viewshed within or adjacent to the graded area. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 10] Date: May 3, 2002 D. UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL REQUIREMENTS: The following guidelines shall be followed by the City Engineering Department in the review and approval of plans and the inspection of work related to the backfill and compaction of utility trenches: 1. Except as noted below, all utility trenches within any street right -of -way or easement shall be backfilled from the top of the pipe zone to the bottom of the pavement structural section with a one sack cement and sand slurry mix. A maximum of one percent (11%) of calcium chloride may be added when a faster cure is required. 2. All utility trenches within a parkway, median or sidewalk area shall be backfilled from the top of the pipe zone to a point one foot (1') below the finished grade. 3. Upon written request to the City Engineer this requirement may be waived for specific special conditions such as excessively wide or deep (in excess of eight feet) trenches. E. SIZE OF SPEED LIMIT SIGNS: The following guidelines shall be followed in determining the size of Speed Limit signs: Less than 45 MPH: 24" x 36 "; 45 MPH or more: 36" x 45 ". The City Engineer or Director of Public Works may determine that a different size of speed limit sign may be warranted or may be more suitable at certain locations. F. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: Where streets are to be dedicated to the City in conjunction with the recordation of a final map, a regulatory traffic signing and striping plan shall be submitted to, and approved by the City Council, along with City Council review and approval of the final map. The traffic signing and striping plan shall show, as a minimum, all proposed regulatory signing and striping, such as stop signs, speed limit signs and parking restriction signs. G. STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON A STATE HIGHWAY: The construction of street improvements on a State Highway by a private developer, may require the City to act in the role of facilitator. To that end the City Engineer and /or the Public Works Director are authorized to take certain actions as follows: 1. Sign Caltrans Encroachment Permit Applications, if required, provided the developer provides the City with appropriate hold harmless indemnification. 2. Take all steps necessary and appropriate to provide for City acceptance of additional street right -of -way and /or easements within and /or adjacent to a State Highway. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 11] Date: May 3, 2002 3. Take all steps necessary and appropriate to convey such additional street right -of -way, easements and improvements to Caltrans upon completion and acceptance of said improvements. H. REPAIR OF DAMAGED SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS: The responsibility for undertaking the repair of damaged sidewalks, curbs and gutters, shall be as follows: Damage Caused by: Responsible Party 1 Street trees or other landscaping located within City a parkway maintained by the City. 2 Street trees or other landscaping located within HOA a parkway maintained by a Home Owners' Association. 3 Street trees or other landscaping within a City Parkway located within the street right -of -way or a City -owned landscape easement adjacent thereto. 4 Trees or other landscaping located on private property: First Repair: City Subsequent Repairs: Owner of the property fronting the damage 5 Any activity of the owner of the property fronting Owner of the the damage, including an agent of the owner property fronting (e.g. renter, contractor, etc.) the damage REAR YARD ACCESS THROUGH BLOCK WALLS: In order to maintain and preserve the structural integrity and the aesthetic quality of Perimeter Walls throughout the City, such walls shall not be altered or removed and reconstructed to provide temporary access to a work site, unless a Wall Access Permit is issued in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. 1. Building Permits: Identification of Work Access: The plot plan attached to any building permit issued for the construction of improvements or modifications to any property, shall identify, on the plot plan, the method or location of the access to the work site. C ., S � A � Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 121 Date: May 3, 2002 2. Prohibited Access: Any requested access which requires the removal and reconstruction of a wall located along a rear of side property line shared with any street, SHALL NOT BE APPROVED. 3. Exceptions: Wall Access Permit: A Perimeter Wall Access Permit may be issued by the City Engineer, when and if the contractor or property owner can adequately demonstrate that it is not possible to construct the desired improvements or modifications without the removal and reconstruction of the Perimeter Wall in order to gain rear access to the property. Exemptions (Wall Access Permit) shall not be granted for the purpose of facilitating the work (i.e. avoid damage to existing landscaping, make the project easier, reduce the cost of the project, etc.). Exemptions may only be granted when there is no way to construct the project without access through the wall. Prior to the approval of any Wall Access Permit, a representative of the City Engineer shall visit the site to confirm that access to the work site is not possible without the removal and reconstruction of a perimeter wall. 4. Conditions of Approval: Any Wall Access Permit issued by the City Engineer shall include Conditions of Approval designed to assure that the wall is restored to its "pre- project" condition. Such Conditions may include any of the following: a) a block wall restoration plan shall be provided; b) block samples shall be provided to the City prior to the approval of the Permit, to assure that the "match" between the existing block wall and the new block is adequate; c) all approved block shall be procured and delivered to the site prior to the issuance of the final permit and the commencement of construction, in order to assure that the final block material "matches" the approved sample [Note: a conditional permit may be issued setting forth all requirements and advising of the City's intent to issue a Wall Access Permit upon delivery and approval of the block material]. d) [if new block does not adequately match the existing wall] the restoration plan shall provide for the removal and reconstruction of the block wall for an entire wall section (pilaster to pilaster). J. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS: U- TURNS: During the review and approval of the Tentative Tract Map and /or the review and plan checking of street improvements plans for the development of proposed new arterial streets, consideration shall be given to the geometirc design for proposed new intersections; and, unless conditions preclude such installation, the final design shall adequately provide for "U- Turn" traffic movements at such intersections. In the event the City Engineer finds that conditions exist which Cv �. <� �• Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 13] Date: May 3, 2002 preclude the need or necessity to provide for "U- Turn" traffic movements, the City Engineer shall prepare a report to the City Manager setting forth the reasons why such provisions should not be included in the final design, prior to making a final determination. K. SECOND DRIVEWAYS: Street Encroachment Permits for the construction of a second driveway on a residential lot, shall not be approved unless and until the applicant has obtained a Zone Clearance approved by the Director of Community Development. Such approval shall be consistent with the requirements of the Moorpark Municipal Code [Section 17.32.011]. L. PLACEMENT OF BANNERS ON STREET LIGHT POLES This policy shall govern the placement of vertical banners on light poles owned by Southern California Edison during City- sponsored or City Co- sponsored community events such as Country Days, Independence Day Celebrations or similar events with a maximum of two events per year with no overlap permitted. Requests to place banners will be considered only for 60 - day time periods prior to and during said City Sponsored or Co- sponsored events. Requests will be considered only from Moorpark based, non -profit groups recognized as religious, educational, civic or cultural. Such requests will be considered pursuant to the following criteria and subject to the City's License Agreement with Southern California Edison. 1. One million dollar insurance coverage must be provided by the applicant organization, with such insurance subject to approval by the City Risk Manager. 2. Applicant organizations are required to execute a defense, indemnity and hold harmless agreement with the City on a form prescribed by the City. 3. Applicant organizations are responsible for all labor (including installation, maintenance, and removal) of the banners and attaching hardware, as well as any claims arising out of their use. 4. Applicant organization must obtain an encroachment permit and sign permit from the City. 5. All requests must be received 60 days in advance of the proposed date for placement of banners. 6. Banners may be in place no longer than 60 days. Only one organization shall have banners in place for any such period. C^^.� ^� %.0 %.# J Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 14] Date: May 3, 2002 7. Banners may contain only the following: a. Logo or identification of the event to be promoted. b. One sponsorship on each side of the banner c. If an individual or family is the sponsor only the family name may appear on the banner. d. Sponsorship of a banner is restricted by the following: • Banners may be sponsored only by City of Moorpark businesses /organizations and residents. • Banners are not to display product symbols, product names, phone numbers or addresses. Banners are not to include name -brand advertising. Banners are not to include any political statements or sponsorship (i.e., no elected officials or officials appointed to an elected office, official candidates, candidate /ballot measure committees, etc.). 8. Requests for the placement of such banners must be accompanied by a sample or rendering of the proposed banner and indicate the size and shape. A sample of the material and colors of the proposed banners must be submitted at the time of application. 9. All requests will be administered by the City Manager or his /her designee whose decision will be final. M. SLOUGH WALLS: 1. Criteria: Slough Walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk when there is a slope of more than four feet (4') in height, immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. Slough Walls shall not be required if there is an area at least five feet (6) wide between the back of sidewalk and the toe of slope. 2. Standards: The City Engineer shall develop and maintain a set of design standards and specifications for the construction of Slough Walls. 3. Implementation: The City Engineer shall require the construction of Slough Walls, in a manner consistent with current design standards and specifications, when ever the above criteria exist. 4. Materials: the materials used for the construction of the slough walls shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. C n n'9 �.R vr. - -_1 — Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 15] Date: May 3, 2002 N. PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION, TRAFFIC INDEX & SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE: This standard pertains to the design and construction of the structural section and subdrain systems for public and private streets. 1. Criteria: Except as provided herein, the methods contained in the Caltrans Design Manual shall be used to design pavement sections and subsurface drainage for streets. Pavement structural sections for public streets shall be designed using Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) for a 50 -year term. Pavement structural sections for private streets shall be designed using Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) for a 20 -year term. The structural section of all public and private streets shall be founded on well- drained basement soils. The determination of the need for subsurface drainage systems to prevent saturation of the pavement structural section or underlying foundation materials shall consider conditions anticipated throughout the design life of all pavement structural sections. Subsurface drainage systems shall be marked with detectable underground utility marking tape buried 6 inches above the pipe. The ends of the marking tape shall be accessible at each surface feature of the subsurface drainage system. 2. Standards: Unless calculations to the contrary are approved by the City, the Traffic Indices shown in table N.2.A shall be used for public streets and the Traffic Indices shown in table N.2.B shall be used for private streets. The wearing surface of all streets shall be 1.5 inches of rubberized asphalt, which shall not be included when computing the required structural section. Except as modified herein, the provisions of the Caltrans "Design Manual" relating to subsurface drainage shall be implemented in the design of all streets. Subsurface water drainage systems shall be designed for ease of maintenance, operation and locatability. 3. Implementation: The City Engineer shall require the construction of street structural sections and subsurface drainage systems to conform to the design standards herein and the provisions of the Caltrans "Design Manual ". Construction materials and methods shall conform to the most recent edition of the "Standard Specification for Public Works Construction ". Geotechnical and hydrologic investigations to determine the physical characteristics of the soil and likelihood of subsurface water that may affect the pavement structural section shall be performed and documented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Materials: Except as provided herein, all materials and construction methods used in the construction of street structural sections, features C.d- .^,? -% 0-> %- � — Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 16] Date: May 3, 2002 and subsurface drainage systems shall conform to the latest edition of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ". a. Pipe used for subsurface drains shall: 1) Be no less than 6 inches in diameter. 2) Be smooth - walled polyvinyl chloride pipe conforming to ASSHTO M278. 3) Have perforations located in the bottom half of collector pipes. 4) Have belled ends or sleeve or stop -type couplings per AASHTO M278. Solvent cementing of joints is not required. 5) When used for outlets, terminal risers, vertical and 45- degree risers, elbows, wyes and tees shall not be perforated. b. Permeable material used for backfilling trenches under, over and around subsurface drains shall 1) Consist of hard, durable, clean gravel, or crushed stone conforming to the quality requirements of table 200- 1.6(B) of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ". 2) Be free from organic material, clay balls, or other deleterious substances. 3) Conform to the gradation requirements of Table N.7.b. c. When permeable material type is not specified Type B permeable material shall be used. d. Filter fabric shall be type 180N. e. Detectable underground utility marking tape have a minimum 0.13 mm (0.005 ") overall thickness, with no less than a 35 gauge (AWG), 0.14 mm aluminum foil core. The foil must be visible from both sides. The layers shall be laminated together with the extrusion lamination process, not adhesives. No inks or printing shall extend to the edges of the tape. All printing shall be encased to avoid ink rub -off. The color - coding of the tape shall be green and the legend shall be "SEWER ". Detectable Underground Utility Marking Tape shall conform to the properties listed in Tables N.7.d. Detectable Underground Utility Marking Tape shall meet the requirements of each of the following agency /association publications. 1) Department of Transportation, Materials Transportation Bureau, Office of Pipeline Safety. USAS code for pressure piping B31.8, paragraph 192.321(e). 2) National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC, Special Study Prevention of Damage to Pipelines. Adopted June 7, 1974. Report NTSB- PSS -73 -1. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 17] Date: May 3, 2002 3) American Petroleum Institute (API). Recommended practice for marking buried liquid petroleum pipelines - APR RP 1109. 4) General Services Administration, Washington, DC, Public Buildings Service Guide Specification for Mechanical and Electrical Equipment - PBS 4 -1501, Amendment 2, Page 501 -14, Paragraph 18, Subparagraph 18.1, Clause 18.1.1. 5) Rural Electrification Authority (REA), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, National Electrical Safety Code for Underground Construction for remote and immediate hazards. TABLE N.2.A Traffic Indices for Public Streets Roadway Designation Maximum Build -out Average Daily Traffic 50 yr ESAL T. 1. B -4 Residential <10,000 171,375 7.5 B -3D Minor Commercial /Industrial 8,000 270,000 8.0 B -3C Commercial /Industrial 16,000 540,000 8.5 B -3B Major Commercial /Industrial 20,000 540,000 8.5 B -3A Secondary Arterial 20,000 540,000 8.5 B -2 Secondary Arterial 24,000 720,000 1 9.0 B -2 Primary Arterial 36,000 1,217,500 1 9.5 TABLE N.23 Traffic Indices for Private Streets C"-� ^.,- ^ 't. Maximum Build -out Roadway Designation Average Daily Traffic 20 yr ESAL T. I. B -4 Residential 1,540 35,400 6.0 C"-� ^.,- ^ 't. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 18] Date: May 3, 2002 TABLE N.7.b PERMEABLE MATERIAL Sieve Sizes Percentage Passing Type A Type B 50 -mm 2" - -- 100 37.5 -mm 11/2" - -- 95 -100 19 -mm 3/4" 100 50 -100 12.5 -mm 1/2" 95 -100 - -- 9.5 -mm 3/8" 70 -100 15 -55 4.75 -mm (No. 4) 0 -55 0 -25 2.36 -mm (No. 8) 0 -10 0 -5 75-pm (no. 200) 0 -3 0 -3 TABLE N.7.d DETECTABLE UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKING TAPE PROPERTIES Property Method Value Thickness ASTM D2103 0114 mm 0.0056" Tensile strength ASTM D882 4500g /cm (25 Ibs /inch) (5,500 PSI Elongation ASTM D882 -88 <50 percent at break Printability ASTM D2578 >50 dynes/square centimeter Flexibility ASTM D671 -81 Pliable hand Inks Manufacturing specifications Heat -set M lex Message repeat Manufacturing specifications Every 500 mm 20" Foil Manufacturing specifications Dead soft/annealed To la er Manufacturing specifications Virgin PET Bottom layer Manufacturing specifications Virgin LDPE Adhesives Manufacturing specifications >30 percent, solid 1.5 #/R Bond strength Boiling H2O at 100 degrees Celsius Five hours without peel Colors APWA Code See Table 207 -25.1 B O. USE OF TEMPORARY STEEL PLATES OVER STREET EXCAVATIONS 1. Steel Plate Bridginq: With a Non -Skid Surface. This standard covers the use of steel plate bridging. Persons conducting work within the public right -of -way shall not use steel plate bridging or trench plate that does not meet the requirements of this section both in application and circumstance of use. -n 41 ter' Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 19] Date: May 3, 2002 2. Requirements for Use: Alternate construction methods that avoid the use of steel plate bridging shall be used by the persons conducting work within the public right -of -way unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. It is recognized that to accommodate excavation work, steel plate bridging may be necessary. All conditions for use of steel plate bridging set forth in the requirements of this standard must be fulfilled as conditions of approval of the use of steel plate bridging. Consideration of the use of steel plate bridging in the review process will take into account the following factors: a. Traffic volume and composition. b. Duration of use of the steel plate bridging. c. Size of the proposed excavation. d. Weather conditions. 3. Plate Score Formula: The following formula shall be used to score the permitted use of steel plate bridging: PS= [ADT +EWL +D +10xWE +5xN +20xW +S kmh +Rx100]x L 1000 8 PS= [ADT +EWL +D +10xWE +5xN +20XW +S m h +Rx100]x L 1000 5 where: PS = plate score. ADT = average daily traffic as defined in the CALTRANS Traffic Manual. • EWL = equivalent wheel loads as defined in the CALTRANS Traffic Manual. • D = total number of 24 hour periods during which the plates will be utilized at the site being considered. • WE = total number of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays that the plates will be utilized at the site being considered. • N = total number of overnight periods that the plates will be in place, exclusive of Saturday, Sunday and holiday nights. • W = total number of 24 -hour periods that the plates will be utilized at the site being considered when the possibility of rain exceeds 40 percent. • S = the design speed in kilometers per hour or miles per hour, as applicable in the formulae above, of the street where the plates are to be installed. This number shall not be reduced for construction zone speed reductions. F' Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 20] Date: May 3, 2002 • R = the quotient of the vertical differential divided by the horizontal distance. The vertical and horizontal dimensions shall be measured at the locations spanning a distance of 15 m (50') up and downstream of the position of the proposed steel plate bridging. • L = the number of lanes where plates will be used. 4. Plate Score Use: When the computed value of the plate score exceeds 50, steel plate bridging shall not be used unless, and at the sole discretion of the City Engineer, it is determinee that no alternative method of construction is possible in lieu of using steel plate bridging or that other overriding considerations make the use of steel plate bridging acceptable. Alternatives considered to bridging shall include, but not be limited to, detouring traffic, construction detour routes, tunneling, boring and other methods of trenchless construction. Unless specifically noted in the provisions of the City Engineer's approval, the use of steel plate bridging at each location so approved shall not exceed four (4) consecutive working days in any given week. 5. Additional Requirements: In all cases when the depth of the trench exceeds the width of the steel plate bridging resting on each side of the pavement adjacent to the trench, safety regulations require or the City Engineer determines that shoring is necessary to protect the health or safety of workers or the public. The persons conduction work within the public way shall install shoring conforming to Section 7- 10.4.1 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ( SSPWC). The trench shoring shall be designed and installed to support the steel plate bridging and traffic loads. All approvals for design, substitution of materials or methods shall be submitted by the persons conduction work within the public way in accordance with all provisions of section 2 -5.3 SSPWC Shop Drawings and Submittals. The Contractor shall backfill and resurface excavations in accordance with section 306 -1.5 SSPWC. 6. Installation: When backfilling operations of an excavation in the traveled way, whether transverse or longitudinal cannot be properly completed within a work day, steel plate bridging with a non -skid surface and shoring may be required to preserve unobstructed traffic flow. In such cases, the following conditions shall apply: a. Steel plate bridging when the plate score exceeds 50 is not allowed except when, at the sole discretion of the City Engineer, it is approved as specified above. b. Steel plates used for bridging must extend no less than 610 mm (2') beyond the edges of the trench. %_ - M ' Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 21] Date: May 3, 2002 c. Steel plate bridging shall be installed and maintained to operate with a noise level such that no sound generated by the steel plate can be heard by a person with normal hearing acuity from a distance of 15 meters (50'). d. No longitudinal trench excavation longer than 15 meters (50') shall be covered with steel plates. 7. Installation Methods: When the use of steel plate bridging and shoring is approved by the City Engineer, the persons conducting work within the public right -of -way shall install using either Method (1) or (2) depending on the design speed of the portion of street where the steel plate bridging is proposed for use. a. Method 1 [For speeds equal to or more than 56 Km /hr (35 MPH)]: The pavement shall be cold planed to a depth equal to the thickness of the plate and to a width and length equal to the dimensions of the plate. The cold milling shall produce a flat surface that the plate shall rest on with no horizontal or vertical movement. Horizontal gaps between the unmilled pavement and the plate shall not exceed 25 mm (1") and shall be filled with elastomeric sealant material which may, at the contractor's option, be mixed with no more that 50 %, by volume, of Type I aggregate conforming to the requirements of tables 203- 5.2(B) and 203- 5.3(A) SSPWC . b. Method 2 [For speeds less than 56 Km /hr (35 MPH)I: Approach plate(s) and ending plate (if longitudinal placement) shall be attached to the roadway and shall be secured against displacement by using two adjustable cleats that are no more than 50 mm (2 ") shorter than the width of the trench. The cleats shall be bolted to the underside of each plate and located within 150 mm (6 ") of the beginning and end of the trench for plates at the beginning and end of the trench. A minimum of two 300 mm long by 19 mm diameter (12" x3/4") steel bolts shall be placed through the plate and driven into holes drilled 300 mm (12 ") into the pavement section, or other devices approved by the City Engineer. Subsequent plates shall be butted and tack welded to each other along 10% of the butted faces. Fine graded asphalt concrete shall be compacted to form ramps, maximum slope 8.5% with a minimum 300 mm (12 ") taper to cover all edges of the steel plates. When steel plates are removed, the dowel holes in the pavement section shall be completely filled with elastomeric sealant material. At the Contractor's option, the methods required for Method 1 may be used. If the use of Method 1 is elected, all requirements of Method 1 shall be used. The Contractor shall maintain the steel plates, shoring, and asphalt concrete ramps and maintain and restore the street surface during and after their use. Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 221 Date: May 3, 2002 8. Materials: The minimum thickness of steel plate bridging shall be as shown in Table 0.7 TABLE 0.7 REQUIRED PLATE THICKNESS FOR A GIVEN TRENCH WIDTH Maximum Trench Width 1 Minimum Plate Thickness 0.3 m 10" 13 mm (1/2") 0.6 m 23" 19 mm 3/4" 0.8 m 31" 22 mm 7/8" 1.0 m 41" 25 mm 1" 1.6 m 63" 32 mm 1 '/4" 9. Longer Spans: For spans greater than 1.6 m (5), a structural design shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval in accordance with section 2 -5.3 SSPWC of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 10. Design Criteria: Steel plate bridging shall be steel plate designed to support the HS20 -44 truck loading per CALTRANS Bridge Design Specifications Manual. The Contractor use steel plate with a non -skid surface having no less than a coefficient of friction of 0.35 as determined by California Test Method 342. In addition to all other required construction signing, the Contractor shall install Rough Road (W33) sign with black lettering on an orange background in advance of steel plate bridging. P. ADVANCE STREET NAME SIGNS: 1. Requirement: All signing and striping plans shall include requirements for the installation of advance street name signs, consistent with the requirements set forth herein. 2. Purpose: The purpose for such signs is to provide advance notice of the name of the streets the driver is approaching. 3. Location / Design: The location and design of all advance street name signs shall be determined by the City Engineer and shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and, if the sign is to be placed in a landscaped parkway or median to be maintained by the City, the Director of Community Services . C..,� �� Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit 'A' [Page 23] Date: May 3, 2002 4. Monument Siqns: A monument sign shall be used whenever possible. Pole signs may be used when the City Engineer determines that the use of a monument sign is inappropriate for a given application. 5. Medians: On streets with raised / landscaped medians, the preferred location for the sign is in the median. 6. Signalized Intersections: Advance street name signs shall not be required for signalized intersections which have overhead internally illuminated street name signs. " 1, "". 'f 0 v v .&--'- TT EM JLUK,_, +1 Moorpark City Council Agenda Report TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: April 18, 2002 (Council Meeting 5 -1 -02) SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition for Los Angeles Avenue Widening Projects OVERVIEW This request that the City Manager be authorized to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of- way and related property rights required by a number of projects related to the widening and improvement of Loa Angeles Avenue. DISCUSSION A. Project Descriptions: The City is undertaking a number of projects to widen Los Angeles Avenue and New Los Angeles Avenue, generally described as follows: 1. Project 8003: Los Angeles Avenue at Beltramo Ranch Road: This project calls for the construction of street widening along the south side of the street from Beltramo Ranch Road easterly to a point east of Maureen Lane. Improvements include additional pavement width, curb, gutter, sidewalk and a traffic signal at the Maureen Lane intersection. The purpose of the project is to provide for six (6) lanes of traffic and to better provide for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. 2. Project 8013: Los Angeles Avenue Widening - Spring Road to Moorpark Avenue: This project calls for the widening of Los Angeles Avenue in order to provide six (6) lanes of traffic. The project requires the shifting of the centerline to the south along a portion of this segment and, therefore, some ROW_L A C Right -of -Way Acquisition for Los Angeles Avenue Widening Projects May 3, 2002 Page 2 widening on the south side of the street just east of Spring Road. Improvements include additional pavement width and curb, gutter and sidewalk where none now exists. 3. Project 8012: Los Angeles Avenue East Realignment and Reconstruction: The project calls for the realignment and reconstruction of Los Angeles Avenue from a point about one thousand feet (1,000) east of High Street, easterly to South Condor Drive. The "realigned" road will have longer curve radii to straighten out some of the sharp curves. Final improvements will include one (1) lane in each direction with a paved median and paved shoulders. The project will require the construction of retaining walls along the north side of the street. B. Right -of -way Acquisition: All of these projects require the acquisition of additional street rights -of -way and related easements. Funds have been appropriated and budgeted for these rights -of -way acquisition costs. C. Land Acquisition Services: has retained the services right -of -way acquisition process includes: • Appraisals • Title work To the extent necessary, the City of a consultant to assist in these efforts. The property acquisition . Engineer (legal description) • Right -of -Way Acquisition Agreements • Offer letters, meetings, negotiations, etc. • Escrow, etc. D. Authorization In order to expedite this process, it is requested that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute documents and otherwise administer the process required to complete the acquisition of these street rights -of -way and related easements. Said authority would include authorizing payment of amounts consistent with the values set forth in an approved Appraisal Report. Should it become necessary to initiate eminent domain proceedings for any such acquisition, the matter would be brought to the City Council for authorization to initiate such proceedings. ROW_L A Right -of -Way Acquisition for Los Angeles Avenue Widening Projects May 3, 2002 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of -way and related property rights required to construct the projects described in this Agenda Report. ROW_L A L j j' ____ r _r.:19ZOf�:RS1t'�"�TS�!s ^r.�'✓, 77 L- MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager DATE: May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Upgrade of Secretary I Position in Assistant City Manager's Office and Modification to Salary Plan DISCUSSION: For several years, the Administrative Services Department had a Secretary I position that supported the clerical and secretarial functions for the Department. The Administrative Services Department also had an Administrative Secretary that provided primary secretarial and administrative support to the Assistant City Manager, who headed the Department. With the appointment of a Director of Administrative Services, the modification of the Administrative Secretary position to Administrative Services Technician and the split of the Department with the separation of the Assistant City Managers Office from the Administrative Services Department, the Secretary I position has taken on a higher level of secretarial support to the Assistant City Manager, especially relative to emergency services, redevelopment, economic development and public information activities. This position has also assumed primary responsibility for administration of the Business Registration Program. An upgrade of the position from Secretary I to Secretary II and a promotion of the incumbent employee is warranted. It's recommended that the City Council approve this upgrade effective May 17, 2002, Costs for this change can be absorbed by other savings in the department and on an annual basis for salary and benefits would result in an approximate cost of $4,500. 4 V V wwi�.r. a City Council Agenda Report May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) Page 2 In September 2001, the City Council modified the salary plan for division heads from Range 71 to a combined range of 71 -74 and for department heads from Range 79 to a combined range of 79 -81. This was to allow flexibility for hiring. This was also in response to difficulty in successfully recruiting to fill these positions and an independent salary survey (prepared by a contract consultant for another jurisdiction that included Moorpark's salary ranges). That survey showed Moorpark's management positions 10 -20 percent below comparable positions. Even with the implementation of the September 2001 changes, it has been difficult to obtain a large candidate pool. For those hired (and offered and declined), it has been at or above the 7th step of the City's 11 step salary plan. It has also resulted in new hires receiving a starting salary at or above comparable or higher level positions (salary compaction). The issue of salary compaction and related separation between mid - management, division heads and department heads, needs to be addressed to ensure both internal equity but also to enhance recruitment and retention. I'm recommending an additional 21,� percent in the salary ranges between division heads and mid - management and between department heads and division heads. The percent of range difference between the other management positions would remain the same. It's recommended that the specific percent salary range difference between the different management levels be as follows: Management Current % Salary Proposed % Salary Level Range Difference Range Difference Mid- 67 N/A 67 NA Management Division 71 -74 171-1% 75 20% Head Department 79 -81 171x% 83 20% Head Deputy City 83 5% 85 5% Manager Assistant 85 10% 87 10% City Manager City Manager 93 20% 95 20% \,,, .✓ v .Le..r �� City Council Agenda Report May 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 15, 2002) Page 3 While the ranges are proposed to be changed, the new ranges do not result in an increase in salary at this time. Incumbents would be moved to a step on the higher range with the same salary. For example, 74F goes to 75E and 79G goes to 83C. The proposed changes would go into effect in July 2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve upgrade of Secretary I to Secretary II position in Assistant City Manager's Office effective May 17, 2002. 2. Direct staff to return with Salary Plan Resolution changes for the June 5 meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 280 r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 8119 -5.4 AND 8119 -6.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 195 "CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS" RELATED TO SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE SUB - REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS PARK ZONES OF THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN I • . WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a need exists to provide adequate standards and regulations concerning exterior lighting in the Carlsberg Specific Plan Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial and Business Park zones; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that standards and regulations affecting exterior lighting are necessary to ensure the public health, safety and welfare within the various neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing on April 8, 2002, adopted Resolution PC- 2002 -423 recommending that the City Council consider and adopt the amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as contained in Exhibit A to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council on May 1, 2002 conducted a public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and reached its decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8119 -5.4 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial Zone)" is amended by adding subsection "e" as follows: Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards e. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking 25 feet in height measured "top of the light fixture. light poles shall conform Moorpark Municipal Code. areas shall not exceed from the ground to the All other exterior to standards of the V r d .ter Ordinance No. Page 2 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. SECTION 2. Section 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Business Park Zone) " is amended by adding new subsection "g" and renaming existing subsection "g" to "h" as follows: Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards g. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. h. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk / ; v ► .:�c E ORDINANCE NO. 281 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE (ZC) NO. 2001 -01 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM R -2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RPD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) 9 DWELLING UNITS /ACRE ON ONE PARCEL (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2.44 GROSS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 12 . WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered the application filed by Colmer Development Company for approval of Zone Change No. 2001 -01 for a change in the Zoning Designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development, 9 dwelling units per acre) on one (1) parcel (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) totaling approximately 2.44 gross acres of land located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff reports and testimony, has made a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Colmer Development Company project serves as the environmental document for the Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Zone Change 2001 -01. ., "W.4--o Ordinance No. 281 Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Zone Change will be in conformance with the City's General Plan, subject to adoption of a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2001 -01, and is in conformance with the City Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that approval of this Zone Change request is in accord with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice and that for those reasons it is appropriate to reclassify the property to RPD 9 dwelling units per acre, as the RPD designation would provide a suitable location for residential land uses that are compatible with property located in the vicinity of the property. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves Zone Change No. 2001 -01 changing the zoning designation on the property from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development 9 units per acre maximum), as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby directs staff to amend the City Zoning Map to reflect the approved zone change. SECTION 6. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute order of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of Ordinance No. 281 Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 3 the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this lst day of May, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: Zoning Exhibit Map ZONING EXHIBIT MAP QCPUTNY rte orc CIO I CT ST CHAFARF.AL Ft1l r r± r •- ,W � ..v s VJS.AM A AVE A 1-yo VRA) f 1 Ft f 24&W ST�A1 RCAIP.T; A •< < FLAY ESTHU, 2 =A LOS ANGLES -- 3 (HWY. 1 t ;� '' _ AVE. R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac Ft: N. A "E. °� C1. ` S L � � CL �i _ / 1 W.SM4k7E M C(� FP<jTE.gFtE�lj?ElN ;* A NORTH EXHIBIT A ,R. 7 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst KZ. SUBJECT: 2002 Legislative Program DATE: May 15, 2002 Attached are two versions of the 2002 Legislative Program: a clean copy as amended by Council and a legislative format that highlights the changes. If you have questions, please call me at 517 -6247. Attachments c: Steven Kueny, City Manager Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manager Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk CITY OF MOORPARK LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 2002 The following Legislative Program was developed to allow the City to respond to state and federal legislation in a proactive manner. The Mayor (or Mayor Pro Tem in the Mayor's absence) is authorized to sign correspondence expressing the City's position on pending legislation consistent with the Legislative Program and /or other positions approved by the City Council. The Budget and Finance Committee will also periodically review legislation for recommendation to the City Council. Staff will monitor the League of California Cities' Priority Focus and other sources to identify pending legislation that may impact the City. Letters expressing the City's position will be drafted for the Mayor's signature, and copies will be distributed to each Councilmember. Pending legislation not addressed by the Legislative Program, or staff recommendations that deviate from the Legislative Program, will be agendized for Budget and Finance Committee review and City Council consideration. PLATFORM STATEMENTS 1. Local Government Finance A. Support legislation that limits cities' contributions to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) and directs the repayment of past contributions. B. Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts the taxing authority of cities over development; weakens existing Government Code Section 66000 fee authority; and redefines any development tax, condition, or other monetary charge as development fees. C. Support legislation requiring the state and federal governments to provide full cost reimbursement to cities for all mandated programs and for all programs resulting in revenue losses. D. Support legislation that safeguards existing City revenue sources from preemption or seizure by the state or county. E. Oppose any change in revenue allocations that would negatively affect the City of Moorpark, including but not limited to the redistribution of sales tax, property tax, transient occupancy tax, and vehicle in -lieu fee. Page 1 of 7 F. Oppose legislation that restricts or limits a city's ability to use tax - exempt debt for the purchase or construction of public purpose improvements. G. Support measures that provide greater fiscal independence to cities and result in greater stability and predictability in local government budgeting. H. Support efforts that provide greater accountability on the part of counties for the distribution of funds back to municipalities, including, but not limited to, fines and forfeitures. I. Oppose any measure that makes local agencies more dependent on the state for financial stability and policy direction. J. Support efforts to reduce the fiscal impact of Proposition 218 on cities. K. Support the establishment of a constitutionally - protected funding structure for local government. L. Support legislation that closes the loophole that allows companies currently doing business in California to create dot -com subsidiaries to avoid collection of sales taxes on Internet commerce. M. Support legislation that authorizes a statewide ballot measure to restore the requirement for a simple majority of voters in a city or county to approve an increase in taxes or issue general obligation bonds. 2. Labor Relations A. Oppose legislation that would restrict a city's ability to use its own employees on public works projects when such projects have previously been advertised for bid. B. Oppose legislation that requires the use of city employees rather than contracting out. C. Oppose any legislation that would grant employee benefits that should be decided at the local bargaining table. D. Oppose legislation that removes or reduces management rights, such as deciding staffing or service levels, either by direct action or increased liability. E. Support legislation that would reform the Workers' Compensation system to reduce employer cost through the reduction of system abuse. Page 2 of 7 F. Support legislation that limits the ability of employees to receive Workers' Compensation benefits for occupational injuries /illnesses that result from stress, disciplinary action, or performance evaluation consultations. G. Oppose legislation that expands or extends any presumptions of occupational injury or illness. H. Oppose any measure that imposes compulsory and binding interest arbitration. I. Oppose efforts that reduce local control over public employee disputes or impose regulations of an outside agency on such disputes. J. Oppose a mandatory Social Security tax for public employers and public employees. 3. Transportation A. Oppose legislation that redirects local transportation funds away from cities. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources to cities to finance local transportation systems, facilities, and improvements. C. Support legislation that provides greater flexibility for the use of local transportation funds. D. Support legislation that will help reduce non -local commercial vehicle traffic on SR -118 through the City. E. Oppose legislation that limits and /or decreases the existing amount of retention proceeds withheld from any payment by a public entity to the contractor on a public project. 4. Environment A. Support legislation that streamlines the state's environmental review process and maintains public participation. B. Support legislation that would eliminate unfunded mandates such as the water course pollution prevention programs. C. Support legislation that reduces or eliminates local government's owner /operator Superfund liability. Page 3 of 7 D. Support legislation to either consolidate or streamline the federal and state Clean Air Acts without reducing air quality standards. E. Support air quality efforts that emphasize use of advanced technologies and market incentives, including use of alternative fuels and development of an infrastructure for alternative fuel vehicles. F. Support legislation that reimburses cities for revenue losses stemming from environmental decisions made without city participation. G. Support legislation that provides money to local governments for energy conservation programs. 5. Waste Management A. Support legislation that provides cities with financial assistance for programs designed to provide for the safe disposal of solid, hazardous, and special waste. B. Support legislation that strengthens cities' ability to direct municipal solid waste flow to designated solid waste facilities. C. Support legislation that streamlines AB 939 tracking and reporting requirements. D. Support legislation that would make grants available to local agencies for programs that encourage the recycling /reclaiming of resources. E. Support legislation that promotes source reduction measures without creating an unfunded mandate. F. Oppose legislation that would restrict or limit local government's ability to franchise refuse and recycling collection services, to direct municipal solid waste flow (flow control) , or to contractually require haulers to guarantee achievement of AB 939 goals. G. Support legislation that promotes recycling and expands the market for recycled materials. H. Support new resource recovery and conversion technologies, such as bio- diesel from organic waste. I. Support legislation that implements the concept of extended manufacturer responsibility for electronic waste and other material types requiring incentives for recycling. Page 4 of 7 6. General Government A. Support legislation that ensures cities receive a proportionate share of property taxes upon withdrawal from a county library services district. B. Support legislation that provides financial assistance for local public libraries without the imposition of new taxes. C. Support legislation that reinstates effective local regulation of the cable television industry and other deregulated utilities, including financial reimbursement for use of pubic right -of -ways. D. Oppose legislation that restricts or weakens a city's ability to regulate smoking areas. E. Support legislation limiting a city's liability associated with hazardous recreational activities, such as skateboarding and in -line skating. F. Oppose legislation that increases local government's exposure to litigation. G. Support maximum local flexibility in contracting for services. H. Oppose efforts to cut funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. I. Support legislation to give non - entitlement cities the same rights as entitlement cities in CDBG program administration. J. Support legislation that makes funds available to refurbish and improve parks. K. Support legislation that promotes low -cost or no -cost spay and neuter programs. L. Support legislation that holds animal owners accountable for injuries or property damage caused by animals under their care or control. 7. Public Safety A. Support legislation that would provide cities with a greater share of fines and forfeitures. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources for commercial truck safety inspections and the enforcement of commercial truck vehicle codes. Page 5 of 7 C. Oppose legislation that weakens enforcement of, and penalties for, commercial truck violations. D. Support legislation that would provide cities with contract law enforcement a proportionate share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues for public safety. E. Support legislation that increases local law enforcement resources without increasing taxes. F. Support legislation that would provide a greater share of seized assets to cities. G. Support legislation that allows use of state and federal public safety grants for maintenance efforts in addition to service increases. 8. Land Use Planning A. Support legislation that reforms annexation law by strengthening cities' authority over spheres of influence and ensures that fair property tax agreements can be obtained. B. Support legislation that provides for shared land use determinations between counties and cities when the General Plan of the city establishes a planning area consistent with Government Code provisions. C. Support legislation that enhances local control and diminishes litigation surrounding adult entertainment facilities. D. Support legislation that strengthens local control to prepare, adopt, and implement fiscal plans for orderly growth, development, beautification, and conservation of local planning areas, including, but not limited to, regulatory authority over zoning, subdivisions, annexations, and redevelopment areas. E. Support efforts that are consistent with the doctrine of "home rule" and the local exercise of police powers, through planning and zoning processes, over local land use. F. Oppose development agreements for undeveloped areas in the cities' spheres of influence that do not conform to city standards. 9. Housing A. Support legislation that addresses occupancy levels and strengthens cities' ability to reduce overcrowding in residential housing. Page 6 of 7 10. B. Support efforts to develop federal, state, and county participation, financial support, and incentives for programs that provide adequate, affordable housing for the elderly, handicapped, and low- income persons throughout the community. C. Oppose legislation that expands the state Department of Housing and Community Development's review role for local Housing Elements. D. Support Housing Element reform legislation that provides greater local control and flexibility, simplifies the process, and improves its effectiveness. E. Support legislation that eliminates the current Regional Housing Needs Allocation process and defines a more equitable process to determine a "fair share" of new housing needed to respond to growth trends in the region. Redevelopment /Economic Development A. Oppose legislation that further weakens a city redevelopment agency's authority to use eminent domain. B. Oppose legislation that would prohibit or limit the establishment of new redevelopment project areas and /or the expansion of existing project areas. C. Oppose legislation that reduces the amount of gross tax increment allocable to redevelopment agencies. D. Support legislation that reforms reporting requirements for redevelopment agencies by simplifying the process and eliminating reporting confusion. E. Oppose legislation that adds restrictions and procedural requirements regarding closed session discussions on land acquisition, use of eminent domain, and disposal of property. F. Oppose measures that would diminish the current authority or financing capabilities of redevelopment agencies. G. Support legislation that gives cities resources to finance economic development efforts, such as business attraction, retention, and growth, as well as marketing and tourism. H. Support legislation that simplifies and streamlines the process for foreign trade. Page 7 of 7 CITY OF MOORPARK LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 20012002 The following Legislative Program was developed to allow the City to respond to state and federal legislation in a proactive manner. The Mayor (or Mayor Pro Tem in the Mayor's absence) is authorized to sign correspondence expressing the City's position on pending legislation consistent with the Legislative Program and /or other positions approved by the City Council. The Budget and Finance Committee will also periodically review legislation for recommendation to the City Council. Staff will monitor the League of California Cities' Priority Focus and other sources to identify pending legislation that may impact the City. Letters expressing the City's position will be drafted for the Mayor's signature, and copies will be distributed to each Councilmember. Pending legislation not addressed by the Legislative Program, or staff recommendations that deviate from the Legislative Program, will be agendized for Budget and Finance Committee review and City Council consideration. PLATFORM STATEMENTS 1. Local Government Finance A. Support legislation that limits cities' contributions to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) and directs the repayment of past contributions. B. Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts the taxing authority of cities over development; weakens existing Government Code Section 66000 fee authority; and redefines any development tax, condition, or other monetary charge as development fees. C. Support legislation requiring the state and federal governments to provide full cost reimbursement to cities for all mandated programs and for all programs resulting in revenue losses. D. Support legislation that safeguards existing City revenue sources from preemption or seizure by the state or county. E. Oppose any change in revenue allocations that would negatively affect the City of Moorpark, including but not limited to the redistribution of sales tax, property tax, transient occupancy tax, and vehicle in -lieu fee. Page 1 of 7 F. Oppose legislation that restricts or limits a city's ability to use tax - exempt debt for the purchase or construction of public purpose improvements. G. Support measures that provide greater fiscal independence to cities and result in greater stability and predictability in local government budgeting. H. Support efforts that provide greater accountability on the part of counties for the distribution of funds back to municipalities, including, but not limited to, fines and forfeitures. I. Oppose any measure that makes local agencies more dependent on the state for financial stability and policy direction. J. Support efforts to reduce the fiscal impact of Proposition 218 on cities. K. Support the establishment of a constitutionally - protected funding structure for local government. L. Support legislation that closes the loophole that allows companies currently doing business in California to create dot -com subsidiaries to avoid collection of sales taxes on Internet commerce. M. Support legislation that authorizes a statewide ballot measure to restore the requirement for a simple majority of voters in a city or county to approve an increase in taxes or issue general obligation bonds. 2. Labor Relations A. Oppose legislation that would restrict a city's ability to use its own employees on public works projects when such projects have previously been advertised for bid. B. Oppose legislation that requires the use of city employees rather than contracting out. C. Oppose any legislation that would grant employee benefits that should be decided at the local bargaining table. D. Oppose legislation that removes or reduces management rights, such as deciding staffing or service levels, either by direct action or increased liability. E. Support legislation that would reform the Workers' Compensation system to reduce employer cost through the reduction of system abuse. Page 2 of 7 F. Support legislation that limits the ability of employees to receive Workers' Compensation benefits for occupational injuries /illnesses that result from stress, disciplinary action, or performance evaluation consultations. G. Oppose legislation that expands or extends any presumptions of occupational injury or illness. H. Oppose any measure that imposes compulsory and binding interest arbitration. I. Oppose efforts that reduce local control over public employee disputes or impose regulations of an outside agency on such disputes. J. Oppose a mandatory Social Security tax for public employers and public employees. 3. Transportation A. Oppose legislation that redirects local transportation funds away from cities. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources to cities to finance local transportation systems, facilities, and improvements. C. Support legislation that provides greater flexibility for the use of local transportation funds. D. Support legislation that will help reduce non -local commercial vehicle traffic on SR -118 through the City. E. Oppose legislation that limits and /or decreases the existing amount of retention proceeds withheld from any payment by a public entity to the contractor on a public project. 4. Environment A. Support legislation that streamlines the state's environmental review process and maintains public participation. B. Support legislation that would eliminate unfunded mandates such as the water course pollution prevention programs. C. Support legislation that reduces or eliminates local government's owner /operator Superfund liability. Page 3 of 7 D. Support legislation to either consolidate or streamline the federal and state Clean Air Acts without reducing air quality standards. E. Support air quality efforts that emphasize use of advanced technologies and market incentives, including use of alternative fuels and development of an infrastructure for alternative fuel vehicles. F. Support legislation that reimburses cities for revenue losses stemming from environmental decisions made without city participation. G. Support legislation that provides money to local governments for energy conservation programs. 5. Waste Management A. Support legislation that provides cities with financial assistance for programs designed to provide for the safe disposal of solid, hazardous, and special waste. B. Support legislation that strengthens cities' ability to direct municipal solid waste flow to designated solid waste facilities. C. Support legislation that streamlines AB 939 tracking and reporting requirements. D. Support legislation that would make grants available to local agencies for programs that encourage the recycling /reclaiming of resources. E. Support legislation that promotes source reduction measures without creating an unfunded mandate. F. Oppose legislation that would restrict or limit local government's ability to franchise refuse and recycling collection services, to direct municipal solid waste flow (flow control), or to contractually require haulers to guarantee achievement of AB 939 goals. G. Support legislation that promotes recycling and expands the market for recycled materials. H. Support new resource recovery and conversion technologies, such as bio- diesel from organic waste. I. Support legislation that implements the concept of extended manufacturer responsibility for electronic waste and other material types requiring incentives for recycling. Page 4 of 7 6. General Government A. Support legislation that ensures cities receive a proportionate share of property taxes upon withdrawal from a county library services district. B. Support legislation that provides financial assistance for local public libraries without the imposition of new taxes. C. Support legislation that reinstates effective local regulation of the cable television industry and other deregulated utilities, including financial reimbursement for use of pubic right -of -ways. D. Oppose legislation that restricts or weakens a city's ability to regulate smoking areas. E. Support legislation limiting a city's liability associated with hazardous recreational activities, such as skateboarding and in -line skating. F. Oppose legislation that increases local government's exposure to litigation. G. Support maximum local flexibility in contracting for services. H. Oppose efforts to cut funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. I. Support legislation to give non - entitlement cities the same rights as entitlement cities in CDBG program administration. J. Support legislation that makes funds available to refurbish and improve parks. K. Support legislation that promotes low -cost or no -cost spay and neuter programs. L. Support legislation that holds animal owners accountable for injuries or property damage caused by animals under their care or control. 7. Public Safety A. Support legislation that would provide cities with a greater share of fines and forfeitures. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources for commercial truck safety inspections and the enforcement of commercial truck vehicle codes. Page 5 of 7 8 C. Oppose legislation that weakens enforcement of, and penalties for, commercial truck violations. D. Support legislation that would provide cities with contract law enforcement a proportionate share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues for public safety. E. Support legislation that increases local law enforcement resources without increasing taxes. F. Support legislation that would provide a greater share of seized assets to cities. G. Support legislation that allows use of state and federal public safety grants for maintenance efforts in addition to service increases. Land Use Planning A. Support legislation that reforms annexation law by strengthening cities' authority over spheres of influence and ensures that fair property tax agreements can be obtained. B. Support legislation that provides for shared land use determinations between counties and cities when the General Plan of the city establishes a planning area consistent with Government Code provisions. C. Support legislation that enhances local control and diminishes litigation surrounding adult entertainment facilities. D. Support legislation that strengthens local control to prepare, adopt, and implement fiscal plans for orderly growth, development, beautification, and conservation of local planning areas, including, but not limited to, regulatory authority over zoning, subdivisions, annexations, and redevelopment areas. E. Support efforts that are consistent with the doctrine of "home rule" and the local exercise of police powers, through planning and zoning processes, over local land use. F. Oppose development agreements for undeveloped areas in the cities' spheres of influence that do not conform to city standards. Housing A. Support legislation that addresses occupancy levels and strengthens cities' ability to reduce overcrowding in residential housing. Page 6 of 7 10. B. Support efforts to develop federal, state, and county participation, financial support, and incentives for programs that provide adequate, affordable housing for the elderly, handicapped, and low- income persons throughout the community. C. Oppose legislation that expands the state Department of Housing and Community Development's review role for local Housing Elements. D. Support Housing Element reform legislation that provides greater local control and flexibility, simplifies the process, and improves its effectiveness. E. Support legislation that eliminates the current Regional Housing Needs Allocation process and defines a more equitable process to determine a "fair share" of new housing needed to respond to growth trends in the region. Redevelopment /Economic Development A. Oppose legislation that further weakens a city redevelopment agency's authority to use eminent domain. B. Oppose legislation that would prohibit or limit the establishment of new redevelopment project areas and /or the expansion of existing project areas. C. Oppose legislation that reduces the amount of gross tax increment allocable to redevelopment agencies. D. Support legislation that reforms reporting requirements for redevelopment agencies by simplifying the process and eliminating reporting confusion. E. Oppose legislation that adds restrictions and procedural requirements regarding closed session discussions on land acquisition, use of eminent domain, and disposal of property. F. Oppose measures that would diminish the current authority or financing capabilities of redevelopment agencies. G. Support legislation that gives cities resources to finance economic development efforts, such as business attraction, retention, and growth, as well as marketing and tourism. H. Support legislation that simplifies and streamlines the process for foreign trade. Page 7 of 7 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: HUGH RILEY, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FINANCING ASSISTANCE FOR THEATER ON HIGH PROJECT DATE: MAY 155 2002 CC: STEVE KUENY, CITY MANAGER Attached for your information is a letter from the Lawrence Janss Company (LJC) requesting financial assistance for the Theater On High Project from the City in the form of a HUD, Section 108 Loan. The costs currently required to renovate the building at 45 High Street as an assembly building are substantially higher than originally expected. Due to the advanced state of physical deterioration suffered by the 75+ year old building. LJC had anticipated and committed to spending $750,000 to acquire and renovate the theater. The total cost including fees, architectural services, construction and equipment now total $1,200,000, creating a need for public financing assistance. Under the Section 108 Program cities may borrow against future Community Development Block Grant Entitlements. Since Moorpark is not an Entitlement City, Ventura County could apply for the program on the City's behalf. The City would repay the loan from future CDBG allocations. Moorpark receives approximately $ 190,000 annually in CDBG Funds from Ventura County. Of this amount approximately $150,000 is available for projects other than public service and administrative costs. The estimated annual commitment of CDBG funds from the City over the term of a 20 -year, Section 108 Loan would average $42,000. The LJC Project can produce revenues as described in the proposal that could be pledged to the repayment of the loan and reduce the use of CDBG Funds. LJC proposes a special surcharge on ticket sales of $.25. This revenue would be committed to repay the loan. The project will also generate increased tax increment revenue to the redevelopment agency that could be considered as an off -set to the loan repayment or applied directly. The loan fiends would be used to reimburse LJC for a bridge loan to purchase the retail building adjacent to the theater building for $400,000 and to fund predevelopment and /or furnishings, fixtures and equipment for the theater that would not trigger prevailing Honorable City Council May 15, 2002 Page 2 wages. The loan would be would be secured by a second deed of trust on both the theater building and the adjacent building that LJC is purchasing. The adjacent building (15 -17 E. High Street), that currently has the bicycle shop, will have additional tenants in the current vacant space as well as provide space for a professional, non - profit theater company that will take up residency in the theater. The expected first deed of trust, based on a private bank loan, would be $280,000. Larry Janss also proposes to provide a personal guarantee for the loan. The attached proposal includes the current Renovation Budget for the theater and a loan repayment schedule including other revenue assumptions. Staff will be meeting with Mr. Janss and will report to the City Council in June. Attachment: May 14, 2002 Letter from the Lawrence Janss Co. May 14, 2002 Mr. Hugh R. Riley Assistant City Manager City of Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93201 RE: Assistance for The Theater on High Dear Hugh: We have been in discussions regarding the renovation of the High Street Theater, as well as the building located at 11 -17 High Street (the "Bike Shop "), for some time now. The merits of bringing this historic building back into production as an operating theater and performing arts venue are unquestioned, as will be the positive impact on High Street as a focus of new activity both by the City of Moorpark and hopefully by other private parties. The purpose of this inquiry is to solicit your assistance in solving a challenging situation I face in the renovation of the Theater on High. The Challenge Last August 2001, I, through my wholly owned corporation, the Lawrence Janss Co. (LJCo.) purchased the theater located at 45 High Street. The theater had been "dark" for over 2 years at that time, having been foreclosed upon through a bankruptcy proceeding. The condition of sale that afforded the low purchase price was that I accept it in its "as is" condition. "As is ", in this case, means that the building meets NO current fire safety or title 24, ADA codes. It is riddled with termites and the corrugated iron plumbing/sewer lines have dissolved away to mud. All of the equipment required to operate theater as a movie /concert/play venue, except the chairs, had been stripped out of the building during its dark time. The electrical service to the building is undersized for its intended use, as is the water main that services the building. Finally, the electrical and HVAC systems are antiquated, obsolete and in a dangerous state of disrepair, in need of complete replacement. Under no circumstance can the building be reopened to the public as an assembly type use without all of the above - mentioned maladies being remedied. The extent of the required renovation, and its attendant cost, renders the renovation and subsequent reopening of the building, as a theater, economically unfeasible. It is that sad fact that we have been focusing on in our exploring of public assistance programs as positive alternatives for this important project. 45 High Street, Moorpark. CA 93021 Mailing Address: 1408 East Thousand Oaks Blvd.. Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 -2841, 805.497.8606 Fax 805.497.1507 This letter outlines the public assistance programs which we discussed at our meeting on May 91h. We have outline two alternatives for consideration. 1. Section 108 Loan Ventura County, as an Urban County under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, may utilize the HUD Section 108 Loan program. In this case, the County would be applying on behalf of the City of Moorpark since the City is not an Entitlement City (over 50,000 population) and therefore may not apply directly. The amount of the Section 108 Loan would be $500,000 and would be secured by a second deed of trust on both the theater building and the adjacent building that I am purchasing. The adjacent building, that currently has the bicycle shop, will have new tenants in the current vacant space as well as provide space for the professional, non - profit theater company that will take up residency in the theater. The expected first deed of trust, based on a private bank loan, would only be $280,000. Attachment A provides the annual Section 108 debt service, based on a 20 -year repayment. After the first year with only partial interest payments, the annual repayment averages about $42,000. 2. Repayment Sources The Theater on High project will generate revenues to the City and its Redevelopment Agency from two sources. The first is a $.25 per ticket "historic surcharge" and the second is the tax increment from the new development. Attachment B details the revenues from those sources. The surcharge will generate $13,572 if the theater only achieves 15% occupancy, $18,096 with 20% occupancy, $22,620 with 25% occupancy and $27,244 with 30% occupancy. For projection purposes, we have shown the occupancy starting at 15% and growing over four years to 30 %. Thereafter, the growth is a conservative 2% annually. There will be tax increment revenues to the Redevelopment Agency as the theater will have a higher assessed value than it is currently on the tax rolls for based primarily on the $250,000 in furnishing, fixtures and equipment that is being added to the building. Based on discussions with the County Assessor, there will be only a minor adjustment in the assessed value based on the funds spent on renovations, because nothing is being done to enlarge the building. There will be added value from the purchase of the adjacent building at $400,000. It is currently on the Assessor's Rolls at $311,100, so there will be an increase in the assessed value by $88,900. We project the net new value at $363,900. Given approximately 51% of the 1% General Levy that goes to the Redevelopment Agency, after the housing set aside and pass through agreements, the project will generate an estimated $1,856 in tax increment. That amount is expected to grow at 2% based on the level allowed by Proposition 13. Mr. Hugh R. Riley May 14, 2002 Page 3 Attachment A, in addition to showing the Section 108 repayment schedule, identifies the potential funding sources. After the ticket surcharge and tax increment are applied there is a need for $15,122 from another source in the first year with lower interest costs. The second year, with full principal and interest payments, the amount needed is $22,381, but falls to $16,961 in the third year and $12,512 in the fourth year. The repayment of Section 108 Loans is an eligible CDBG expense. Of the approximately $160,000 in annual CDBG funds received by the City, the amount needed in the early years represents only about 12% of the CDBG allocation. That percentage falls each year as the ticket surcharge and tax increment revenues increase. By the last year of the Section 108 repayment, the amount of CDBG funds needed is only $2,206, or less than 1.5% of the City's annual allocation. 3. Eligible Activity I would propose that the $500,000 be used to reimburse me for a bridge loan to purchase the adjacent building for $400,000 and to fund predevelopment and/or furnishings, fixtures and equipment for the theater that would not trigger prevailing wages. The eligible activity is in the HUD Regulations at 570.703(i)(1) — economic development activities — job generation. The theater will generate three full time and another 6.5 FTE jobs. The new retail tenant will have two full time and one part time. Those total 12 FTE employees. Additionally, when the theater company is in operation there will be another five to 15 persons employed when a play is in production. I project employment as a function of plays activity (rehearsals, set building, actual productions, etc)will run for between 18 to 40 weeks out of the year. The test for the HUD Regulations is one job per $50,000 in HUD funds. With the certain 12 FTE that equates to $41,667 meeting the test, and would be even a lower cost per job as we factor in the theater company employees. 4. Environmental Clearance and Action Plan Amendment I understand that I may not be reimbursed for funds I advance until the project is included in the County's current year CDBG Action Plan and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process is completed and a Release of Funds notice is received from the Los Angeles HUD Area Office. I have already asked my environmental consultant to begin coordination on the NEPA clearance with City staff. The amendment of the Action Plan would be one of the agenda items when we meet with Ventura County. 5. No Risk to City I have the resources from a private bank, equity and lines of credit to carry out the renovation of the theater and to purchase the adjacent building and make the necessary improvements to it. Therefore, the draw down of the Section 108 Loan funds can occur after the renovation is complete, eliminating any risk to the City that the project will not be completed as committed. Should I not complete the renovation, then the City would not be obligated to draw down the Mr. Hugh R. Riley May 14, 2002 Page 4 funds. The City should be clear that the economics of the project will not support the added debt, so there is a need for the $500,000 in Section 108 funds so that I can repay the lines of credit and equity advances. The City's risk after drawing down the funds is secured by the deed of trust on both the theater and the adjacent building where the combined values substantially exceed the mortgage by the lender and the Section 108 loan. 6. Alternative Funding As noted, the project meets the requirements of the CDBG program. As an alternative to the Section 108 Loan structure, I would again agree to complete the project from my own resources. The City could then repay the $500,000 from a commitment of $100,000 of CDBG funds each year for five years. The CDBG fund demand would actually be less than $100,000 annually if the ticket surcharge amounts were rebated back to me during that period. The net amount of the CDBG funds over the five years would be approximately $409,501. This approach eliminates the need to apply for the Section 108 Loan through Ventura County. We stand ready to discuss the information provided in this letter and the attachments. I am advised by Mark Briggs & Associates that this program is a sound structure and a workable program under either the Section 108 or CDBG program. At the appropriate time, we are also ready to be part of the group that discusses this approach with Ventura County. Attachments j anss /moorpark/riley2 MASTER RENOVATION BUDGET Theater on High ➢ Municipal Permits & Fees ➢ General Construction: including compliance with all codes, Fire, ADA, etc. ➢ HVAC Systems; Replace ➢ Projection Systems: 35mm projector, speakers, amps, com- puterized sound syncing systems ➢ Projection Screen ➢ Curtains, Masking ➢ Acoustic Finishes ➢ Cyc Curtain ➢ Audio & Lighting Controls ➢ Concession Stand, millwork, equipment, turnkey ➢ Ticketing /Box - Office systems /software ➢ Marquee ➢ Phone,cable,DSL lines ➢ Miscellaneous: poster cases, FFE Subtotal ➢ Contingency @ 5% ➢ Original investment plus architectural work to date $27,500.00 $515,000.00 $35,000.00 $43,000.00 $31,000.00 $12,800.00 $18,000.00 $4,200.00 $15,500.00 $48,000.00 $20,000.00 $44,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $834,000.00 $41,000 + $325,000.00 Total estimated project cost. $1,200,000.00 VENTURA COUNTYXITY OF MOORPARK SECTION 108 REPAYMENT - HIGH STREET THEATER moorpark2 May 13,2002 Fully Amortizing Over 20 Years Drawdown Assumptions November 1,2002 $ Fees Underwriter $ Legal & Accounting $ Trustee Fees $ Wire Transfer Fees $ Total Fees $ Total $ 500,000 Historic costs for fees 3,000 (55 to 60 basis points) 150 ($300 per $1 MM of notes) 6,000 ($250 to $300 per years in term of repayment) 50 ($50 per draw down event) 9,200 509,200 Repayment Assumptions Average Interest from August 2, 2001 Public Offering Principal amortization over 20 years 5.72% Interim Interest based on May 3, 2002 3 -Month LIBOR plus 20 basis points 2.12% Assumed Public Offering Date for Funding August 2,2003 Section 108 Repayment Repayment Sources Tax Theater Required Increment Fees CDBG $ 1,856 $ August $ 15,122 August February Fiscal Year $ 22,381 $ 1,931 $ 22,620 Principal $ 1,969 Interest 27,144 Interest $ 2,009 Total 27,687 Ending Fiscal Year $ Payment $ 11,391 Payment Payment Payments $ 10,727 Balance 2002 -03 Payment of Fees) 29,382 $ 9,200 $ 29,969 $ 10,105 $ 2,218 $ 30,569 2002 -03 $ - $ - $ 2,650 $ 11,850 $ 500,000 2003 -04 $ 14,000 $ 2,650 $ 13,900 $ 30,550 $ 486,000 2004 -05 $ 15,000 $ 13,900 $ 13,471 $ 42,370 $ 471,000 2005 -06 $ 15,000 $ 13,471 $ 13,042 $ 41,512 $ 456,000 2006 -07 $ 16,000 $ 13,042 $ 12,584 $ 41,626 $ 440,000 2007 -08 $ 17,000 $ 12,584 $ 12,098 $ 41,682 $ 423,000 2008 -09 $ 18,000 $ 12,098 $ 11,583 $ 41,681 $ 405,000 2009 -10 $ 19,000 $ 11,583 $ 11,040 $ 41,623 $ 386,000 2010 -11 $ 21,000 $ 11,040 $ 10,439 $ 42,479 $ 365,000 2011 -12 $ 22,000 $ 10,439 $ 9,810 $ 42,249 $ 343,000 2012 -13 $ 23,000 $ 9,810 $ 9,152 $ 41,962 $ 320,000 2013 -14 $ 24,000 $ 9,152 $ 8,466 $ 41,618 $ 296,000 2014 -15 $ 26,000 $ 8,466 $ 7,722 $ 42,188 $ 270,000 2015 -16 $ 27,000 $ 7,722 $ 6,950 $ 41,672 $ 243,000 2016 -17 $ 29,000 $ 6,950 $ 6,120 $ 42,070 $ 214,000 2017 -18 $ 31,000 $ 6,120 $ 5,234 $ 42,354 $ 183,000 2018 -19 $ 32,000 $ 5,234 $ 4,319 $ 41,552 $ 151,000 2019 -20 $ 34,000 $ 4,319 $ 3,346 $ 41,665 $ 117,000 2020 -21 $ 37,000 $ 3,346 $ 2,288 $ 42,634 $ 80,000 2021 -22 $ 39,000 $ 2,288 $ 1,173 $ 42,461 $ 41,000 2022 -23 $ 41,000 $ 1,173 $ - $ 42,173 $ - Repayment Sources Tax Theater Required Increment Fees CDBG $ 1,856 $ 13,572 $ 15,122 $ 1,893 $ 18,096 $ 22,381 $ 1,931 $ 22,620 $ 16,961 $ 1,969 $ 27,144 $ 12,512 $ 2,009 $ 27,687 $ 11,986 $ 2,049 $ 28,241 $ 11,391 $ 2,090 $ 28,805 $ 10,727 $ 2,132 $ 29,382 $ 10,965 $ 2,174 $ 29,969 $ 10,105 $ 2,218 $ 30,569 $ 9,175 $ 2,262 $ 31,180 $ 8,175 $ 2,308 $ 31,804 $ 8,077 $ 2,354 $ 32,440 $ 6,878 $ 2,401 $ 33,088 $ 6,581 $ 2,449 $ 33,750 $ 6,155 $ 2,498 $ 34,425 $ 4,629 $ 2,548 $ 35,114 $ 4,003 $ 2,599 $ 35,816 $ 4,220 $ 2,651 $ 36,532 $ 3,278 $ 2,704 $ 37,263 $ 2,206 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: HUGH RILEY, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER_ SUBJECT: MEETING BROADCAST- CAMERA COVERAGE DATE: MAY 15, 2002 CC: STEVE KUENY, CITY MANAGER As a result of the repairs to the roof /ceiling in the Apricot Room that damaged the conduits for the required robotics, we have been unable to reinstall the remote cameras formerly located at the rear of the meeting room. These cameras provided the wide -angle group and close -up views during the meetings. We expect to complete the installation of the new equipment by the meeting of June 5. If full range of camera angles is not available by then, staff will arrange for a third camera mounted on a tripod as used for the meetings in the Citrus Room.