Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2002 0116 CC REGOrdinance No. 276 Resolution No. 2002 -1932 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2002 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Eric Sweitz, Sonrise Pacific Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 4. ROLL CALL: 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. City Manager's Monthly Report. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL RECESS TO CONVENE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 2 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2001 -01 Amending Chapters 17.08, 17.20, 17.24, and 17.28 of the Municipal Code Related to Recreational Vehicle Storage and Parking. (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of December 5, 2001.) Staff Recommendation: 1) Close the public hearing and continue this item off calendar; and 2) Direct staff to re- advertise for public hearing upon completion of the necessary revisions. B. Consider Draft Ordinance Regulating Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Moorpark by Adding Chapter 17.42 and Amending Chapters 17.08 and 17.20 of Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and Repealing Ordinance No. 275 upon the Effective Date of the New Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2001 -03). (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of December 5, 2001)). Staff Recommendation: 1) Continue the public hearing, take public testimony, and close the public hearing; and 2) Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. for first reading. C. Consideration of Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH- 1994081075), General Plan Amendment No. 99 -01, Zone Change No. 99 -01, Residential Planned Development No. 99 -02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 5187, to Develop 250 Single- family Homes on a Portion of a 350 -acre Site, Located on the West Side of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately 3,500 feet North of Casey Road. Applicant: West Pointe Homes. (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of December 19, 2001). Staff Recommendation: 1) At the January 16, 2002, meeting accept public testimony and continue the public hearing to an Adjourned City Council meeting in January 2002; 2) At the Adjourned City Council meeting, take the following approval actions: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH 1994081075) and approving the Mitigation Monitoring Program; Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 3 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) General Plan Amendment 99 -01; Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading adopting Zone Change 99 -01; Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5187 and Residential Planned Development Permit No.99 -02, subject to conditions of approval, and to become effective upon the effective date of the Zoning Ordinance; and authorize the City Manager to make final editorial corrections to final approval documents to achieve consistency. D. Consider Adoption of Ordinance for Approval of Development Agreement No. 2001 -01 for West Pointe at North Ranch (General Plan Amendment 99 -01, Zone Change 99 -01, Residential Planned Development 99 -02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5187) on the Application of West Pointe Homes, Inc. (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of December 19, 2001.) Staff Recommendation: 1) Continue to take public testimony; and 2) Continue the public hearing open to an Adjourned meeting in January 2002. E. Consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Appeal 2001 -05, Appealing Various Conditions Established by the Director of Community Development for Approval of Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10, to Allow a Second Dwelling Unit at 6086 Gabbert Road. (Applicant: Cindy Hollister). (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of December 19, 2001). Staff Recommendation: 1) Continue the public hearing; accept public testimony; close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , sustaining the Planning Commission decision to Deny Appeal No. 2001 -05, and further modifying the conditions of approval; and 3) Direct Staff to begin code enforcement action for removal of non - permitted mobilehome within ninety (90) days. F. Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 for a 2,868 Square Foot Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with Drive - through Service and a 17,196 Square Foot Two -story Retail /Office Building on Property Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue One Property West of the Southwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue / Leta Yancy Road, North of the City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 4 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) Arroyo Simi, on the Application of Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty (Assessors Parcel No. 506 -0 -05 -050). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the requested entitlements prior to making a decision on the project; 3) Direct staff to prepare a resolution for denial of the project without prejudice for the reasons discussed in the agenda report. G. Consider Dedicating Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Authorized For Affordable Housing For Program Year 1998 ($12,000) to Administrative Costs For CalHome Mobilehome Rehabilitation. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) Staff Recommendation: 1) Open public hearing, accept public testimony, and close public hearing; 2) Authorize $12,000 in CDBG Affordable Housing funds to be designated for CalHome mobilehome rehabilitation program set -up and service delivery fees for approximately 12 mobilehome rehabilitation loans; 3) Limit each borrower's share of the transaction costs of a mobilehome rehabilitation loan to the costs of appraisal and loan processing, not to exceed $750; and 4) Stipulate that loan costs for each CalHome mobilehome rehabilitation loan transaction are to be paid by the CalHome service delivery fee (5% of loan amount); borrower, subject to a maximum amount of $750; and CDBG funds. H. Consider Adoption of an Ordinance to Rescind Existin Chapter 15.24 and Replace with New Chapter 15.24, Regarding Flood Damage Prevention. Staff Recommendation: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, and continue the public hearing open to February 6, 2002. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Approval of the Re- design of the Retainin Walls for the Los Angeles East Improvement Project (Project 8012) . Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the redesign of the retaining walls to provide for the construction of reinforced concrete soil nailed City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 5 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued) simulated rock cut wall; and 2) Use existing easement documents and defer preparation of new easement documents unless right -of -way costs exceed the cost of their preparation. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Adjourned Meeting of December 20, 2001. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of January 9, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - January 16, 2002. Manual Warrants 108095 - 108096 Voided Warrants 106042 & 107095 & 107910 (Pentamation additional 107983 & 108084 remittance copy) Payroll Liability 107960 - 107968 & Warrants 108085 - 108094 Regular Warrants 107969 - 108083 & 108100 - 108156 & 108157 - 108183 $ 28,325.25 $ (841.50) $ 11,527.02 $ 16,632.18 $748,940.11 $ 11,499.02 $269,785.55 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider Use of Funds Received Pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding with Hidden Creek Ranch LP, North Park Villaqe LP, and Messenger Investment Company. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to deposit $130,000 of funds received pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding into the City Hall Improvement Fund. City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 6 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) D. Consider Authorizing City Manager to Approve a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc., for the Scanning of City Records to Digital /Electronic Image in the Questys Software Format. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to approve the Agreement between the City and California CD Creations, Inc. E. Consider Adjustment to the Hourly Rates Charged for Engineering Services. Staff Recommendation: Approve a 2.7% increase to the rates charged for Engineering Services, effective January 1, 2002. F. Consider an Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE for Regular Monthly Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Event Participation. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE Environmental Inc. for provision of Regional Household and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) Hazardous Waste Collection Program Services, subject to final language approval by the City Attorney and City Manager; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. G. Consider Resolution Designating Poindexter Avenue to be a Through Street in the Vicinity of Endeavor Court, and Directing the Placement of a Stop Sign at the Endeavor Court Entrance Thereto. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- H. Consider Resolution in Support of Proposition 42, a Measure to Restrict the Use of Gasoline Taxes to Transportation Systems Improvements. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- I. Consider Support for Assembly Bill 1145 Regarding Formation Proceedings for Regional Open -Space District in Ventura County. Staff Recommendation: Support Assembly Bill 1145 and authorize the Mayor to sign letters of support. 12. ORDINANCES: City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 7 13. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) E. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: 203 E. Los Angeles Ave., Moorpark, CA 93021 and 213 E. Los Angeles Ave., Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiating Parties: The City of Moorpark and Wayne Colmer Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment F. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative Services, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, and Director of Public Works. G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998 City Council Agenda January 16, 2002 Page 8 14. ADJOURNMENT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517- 6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II). STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss CITY OF MOORPARK ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, La -Dell VanDeren, declare as follows: That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that an agenda of the Regular Meeting of the Moorpark City Council to be held on Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, was posted on January 11, 2002, at a conspicuous location near the place of the meeting: Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 11, 2002. La -Dell VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council ITEM 7- A- - of A �" i -cp-'o al K1Ie -1 lA f 1 Ok 1 . FROM: Deborah S. Trafffeen-stedt, Acting Community Development Director 1 Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst N DATE: January 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2001 -01 Amending Chapters 17.08, 17.20, 17.24, and 17.28 of the Municipal Code Related to Recreational Vehicle Storage and Parking. ((Continued with Public Hearing Open from City Council Meeting of December 5, 2001)) BACKGROUND The Planning Commission considered the proposed code amendment at their meetings on September 10, September 24, and October 15, 2001, and adopted Resolution No. PC- 2001 -415, recommending adoption of the proposed amendments to City Council. This matter was originally scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on November 7, 2001, and again on December 5, 2001 at which time it was continued with the hearing open to this date to allow staff time to review City Attorney comments, and make required technical changes to the draft ordinance. DISCUSSION Although staff and the City Attorney have continued work to complete revisions to the Ordinance draft, staffing shortages within the Community Development Department have delayed progress on this item. It is recommended that this item be taken off the calendar and re- advertised for public hearing once the revisions have been completed. 000061. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Zone Ordinance Amendments \RV Ord \cc 020116 RV StfRprt.doc Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2001 -01 Recreational Vehicle Parking and Storage January 16, 2002 Page 2 STAFF RECOrMENDATION 1. Close the Public Hearing and continue this item off calendar 2. Direct staff to re- advertise for public hearing upon completion of the necessary revisions. 000002 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Zone Ordinance Amendments \RV Ord \cc 020116 RV StfRprt.doc TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council ITEM 3' ACi Cyr' i �LLrI �Pr aFj /�r_.1 1 BY Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community Development 57_ January 8, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance Regulating Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Moorpark by Adding Chapter 17.42 and Amending Chapters 17.08 and 17.20 of Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and Repealing Ordinance No. 275 upon the Effective Date of the New Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2001- 03) BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance on December 5, 2001. After consideration of public testimony, the Council continued the public hearing open to January 16, 2002 and directed staff to consider comments received and determine whether additional modifications to the ordinance were needed. Specific edits requested by the Council were made and are shown with the use of legislative format in the attached revised draft ordinance (Attachment 1). Several edits were also made to address the comments received from the wireless service providers, including but not limited to the addition of Section 17.42.010.E pertaining to placement of Wireless Communications Facilities in the public right -of -way, and changing the Conditional Use Permit requirement to an Administrative Permit requirement for a pre- approved location on a public property site (Section 17.42.090.A.2). The prior City Council agenda report for the December 5, 2001 meeting is attached (Attachment 2) for reference purposes regarding background, including Planning Commission recommendations (the prior exhibits are not included with this report). { 11 Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 2 At an adjourned meeting on December 20, 2001, the City Council did adopt Ordinance No. 275 to extend the moratorium on the issuance of permits for construction or placement of wireless telecommunications facilities through April 18, 2002. If the attached draft ordinance is adopted by Council, Ordinance No. 275 would be repealed upon the effective date of the new ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue the public hearing, take public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. for first reading. Attachments: 1. Revised Draft Ordinance 2. City Council 12/5/01 Agenda Report without Attachments 000004 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF MOORPARK BY ADDING CHAPTER 17.42 AND AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.08 AND 17.20 OF TITLE 17, ZONING, OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 275 UPON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on July 19, 2001, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 272, enacting for a period of 45 days a moratorium on the issuance of permits for construction or placement of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities in the City and declaring the urgency thereof; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 2001, the City Council considered the status of interim prohibition of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities and extension of Ordinance No. 272, and adopted Ordinance No. 273, extending Ordinance No. 272 for a period of 135 days; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2001, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on a proposed ordinance to regulate Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Moorpark and adopted a resolution recommending City Council approval of the draft ordinance; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2001, and January 16, 2002, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on a proposed ordinance to regulate Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Moorpark and reached its decision on January 16, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to Title 17, Zoning, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act based on Section 15308 of the State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. SECTION 2. Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 17.42 to read as follows: ATTACHMENT 1 000005 Ordinance No. Page 2 "Chapter 17.42 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Sections: 17.42.010 PURPOSE. 17.42.020 DEFINITIONS. 17.42.030 APPLICABILITY. 17.42.040 DISTANCES. 17.42.050 REGULATIONS FOR BOTH MAJOR AND MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. 17.42.060 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR BOTH MAJOR AND MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. 17.42.070 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR MINOR FACILITIES. 17.42.080 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR MAJOR FACILITIES. 17.42.090 PUBLIC PROPERTY FACILITIES. 17.42.100 APPEAL OR REVIEW AND NOTICES. 17.42.110 RESERVATION AND RIGHT TO REVIEW PERMITS. 17.42.120 FACILITY REMOVAL. 17.42.130 TEMPORARY USE DURING DECLARED EMERGENCY. 17.42.010 PURPOSE. A. The purpose of these requirements and guidelines is to regulate the location and design of Wireless Communications Facilities as defined herein to facilitate the orderly deployment and development of wireless communications services in the City of Moorpark, to ensure the design and location of Wireless Communications Facilities are consistent with policies of the City previously adopted to guide the orderly development of the City of Moorpark to promote the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, quality of life and general welfare of the City's residents, to protect property values and enhance aesthetic appearance of the City by maintaining architectural and structural integrity, and by protecting views from obtrusive and unsightly accessory uses and Facilities. B. In adopting and implementing the regulatory provisions of this Ordinance, it is the intent of the Moorpark City Council to further the objectives specified above, and to create reasonable regulations in conformance with the provisions of the Telecommunication Act of 1996 without unnecessarily burdening the federal interests in ensuring access to telecommunication services, in promoting fair and effective competition among competing communication service providers, and in eliminating local restrictions and regulations that, with regard to antennas, may preclude reception of an acceptable signal quality \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.dsc 0000G Ordinance No. Page 3 or may unreasonably delay, prevent, or increase the cost of installation, maintenance, or use of such antennas. C. The Moorpark City Council has found and determined that these requirements and guidelines for Wireless Communications Facilities are necessary to attain such purposes. D. These regulations are intended to supersede any applicable provisions of Title 17, Zoning, hereinafter in this Chapter referred to as the Moorpark Zoning Code, pertaining to such antenna structures and appurtenant communication equipment and to establish minimum requirements and flexible guidelines for the governance of Wireless Communications Facilities, taking into consideration the rapid technological advances and the proliferation in use of Radio Communication services. E. With regard to applications to place Wireless Communications Facilities in the public right -of -way, these regulations are intended to be reasonable time, place, and manner regulations in accordance with the City's powers, California Public Utilities Code section 7901, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (specifically, Title 47, United States Code, Section 253 and Section 332(c)(7)). If an application to place Wireless Communications Facilities in the public right -of -way complies with the rules and guidelines set forth in this Chapter, then the City shall issue any necessary permits for completion of the Facilities. 17.42.020 DEFINITIONS. For purposes ( phrases and their herein. The word directory. If a Section 17.08.010 referenced. )f this Ordinance, t derivations shall "shall" is always definition is not of the Moorpark he following words, terms, have the meanings given mandatory and not merely listed in this Chapter, Zoning Code shall be "Accessory Equipment" means any equipment installed, mounted, operated or maintained in close proximity to an Antenna Structure to provide power to the Antenna Structure or to receive, transmit, or store signals or information received by or sent from an antenna. "Antenna Structure" means an antenna, any structure designed specifically to support an antenna, and /or any appurtenances mounted on such structure or antenna. \\MOR— PRI —SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Corn Facilities Ord.doc 000007 Ordinance No. Page 4 "Colocation" or "Colocated" means the location of multiple antennas which are e }'ieYmay be owned or operated by fRere than one (1) or more service providers at a single location and are mounted to a common supporting structure, wall or building. "Commercial Mobile Service" means any mobile service that (1) is offered in return for monetary compensation, (2) is available to the public or a substantial portion of the public and (3) provides subscribers with the ability to access or receive communication from the public switched telephone network. Commercial Mobile Service includes, but is not limited to, paging service, wireless data transmission, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service (SMR) , and personal communications service (PCs). "Disguised Facility" means any Wireless Communications Facility, which is designed to blend into the surrounding land, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure. "Fixed Wireless Service" means any service providing Radio Communication to or from Antenna Structures at fixed and specified locations which are not designed to be moved during operation and which offers the ability to access or receive communication from the public switched telephone network. "Ground Mounted" means a Wireless Communications Facility that is Mounted to a pole, Lattice Tower or other freestanding structure that is specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna. "Lattice Tower" means a tower -like structure used to support antennae and comprised of up to two or more steel support legs. "Major Facility" means a Wireless Communications Facility that is either Ground Mounted; —or is Roof Mounted, and provided that the Roof Mounted Facility is not screened on all four sides by solid material that is architecturally compatible with the surrounding land uses, or the Roof Mounted Facility exceeds the maximum building height of the applicable zoning district in which the Major Facility is located, or the Roof Mounted Facility is not a Disguised Facility or a Stealth Facility. \\MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc 000008 Ordinance No. Page 5 "Microwave Communication" means the transmission or reception of Radio Communication at frequencies of a microwave signal (generally, in the 3GHz to 3000Hz frequency spectrum). "Minor Facility" means a Wireless Communications Facility that is Wall Mounted, Utility Mounted, or Roof Mounted as follows: (1) If Wall Mounted, the Facility is architecturally compatible with the building structure and surrounding land uses; (2) If Utility Mounted, the Facility is required to be compatible with surrounding land uses, must be proposed for attachment to an existing above - ground structure, and comply with all other provisions of Section 17.42.070.B, 17.42.070.C, and 17.42.070.D of this Code; and (3) If Roof Mounted, the entire Facility must be screened with solid material on four sides, must be architecturally compatible with surrounding land uses, and must not exceed the maximum building height of the applicable zone district in which the Facility is located; and (4) If Wall Mounted, Utility Mounted, or Roof Mounted, qualifies as a Disguised Facility or a Stealth Facilitv. "Mobile Service" means any temporary service providing Radio Communication to or from at least one (1) antenna that is designed to be moved during operation or used during halts at unspecified locations; or as otherwise defined in 47 USCS Section 153 and interpreted by the Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register. "Mounted" means any manner of attachment, support, or connection, whether on ground or on a structure. " Multipoint Distribution Service" means a microwave communication service that delivers video programming directly to subscribers, including multichannel, multipoint distribution services, instructional television fixed services, and local multipoint distribution services, or as otherwise defined by the Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 1.4000 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations and any interpretive decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission. "Radio Communication" means the transmission and /or reception of impulses, writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds through space by means of electromagnetic waves. \\M0R_PR1_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc 00OWS Ordinance No. Page 6 "Roof Mounted" means a Facility that is mounted on any structure that is not specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting antennae, in any manner that does not satisfy either the definition of Wall Mounted or Utility Mounted, and is typically mounted on the roof of a building. "Satellite Antenna" means a device used to transmit and /or receive radio or electromagnetic waves between terrestrially and orbitally -based uses. This definition is meant to include, but not limited to, what are commonly referred to as satellite earth stations, TVRO's (Satellite Television Receiving Antenna) , and satellite microwave antennas. "Stealth Facility" means any Wireless Communications Facility which is disguised to appear as another natural or artificial object that is prevalent in the surrounding environment or which is architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure. "Utility Mounted" means a Facility that is Mounted to an existing above - ground structure that is specifically designed and originally installed to support electrical power lines, cable television lines, street lighting, traffic signal equipment, park lighting or a structure on public or private property deemed by the City to be similar in nature. "Wall Mounted" means a Facility that is Mounted on any vertical surface or nearly vertical surface of a building or other existing structure that is not specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna i.e., the exterior walls of a building, an existing parapet, the side of a water tank, the face of a church steeple, or the side of a freestanding sign such that the highest point of the Antenna Structure is at an elevation equal to or lower than the highest point of the surface on which it is Mounted. "Wireless Communications Facility" or "Facility" means an Antenna Structure and any appurtenant Facility or Accessory Equipment located within City limits and that is used in connection with the provision of Wireless Service. "Wireless Service" means any type of Wireless Service providing Radio Communication that satisfies the definition of Commercial Mobile Service, Fixed Wireless Service, or Wireless Video Service. AMOR— PRI_SEMCity Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc 00100110 Ordinance No. Page 7 "Wireless Video Service" means any service providing Radio Communication, which delivers video programming. 17.42.030 APPLICABILITY. A. All Wireless Communications Facilities which are erected, located, Mounted or modified within the City of Moorpark on or following the effective date of this Ordinance shall comply with this Chapter, subject to the categorical exemptions under Paragraph (D) of this Section, provided that: 1. All Facilities for which applications were determined complete by the Community Development Department prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines of this Chapter and shall be subject to Chapter 17.52 of the Moorpark Zoning Code regulating nonconforming structures and uses and any other applicable permit requirements of the Moorpark Zoning Code. 2. All Facilities for which building permits were issued by the City of Moorpark prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall be exempt from the regulations and guidelines of this Chapter, and shall be subject to the regulations and guidelines of Chapter 17.52 of the Moorpark Zoning Code, regulating nonconforming structures and uses, unless and until such time as Paragraph (A) of this Section applies. B. All Facilities for which building permits and any extension thereof have expired shall comply with the provisions of this Chapter. C. All Facilities constructed or erected prior to the effective date of this Ordinance that are in violation of applicable laws, ordinances, or other regulations shall be considered an illegal nonconforming Facility, no longer permitted, and shall be subject to abatement as a nonconforming use pursuant to Section 17.52.060 of the Moorpark Zoning Code. D. The following uses shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter until such time as federal regulations are repealed or amended to eliminate the necessity of the exemption: 1. Any Antenna Structure that is one (1) meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter and is designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct -to -home 000011 \\MOR— PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 8 satellite service, as defined by Section 207 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and any interpretive decisions thereof issued by the Federal Communications Commission; 2. Any Antenna Structure that is two (2) meters (78.74 inches) or less in diameter located in a commercial or industrial zone and is designed to transmit or receive Radio Communication by Satellite Antenna; 3. Any Antenna Structure that is one (1) meter (39.37 inches) or less in diameter or diagonal measurement and is designed to receive Multipoint Distribution Service, provided that no part of the Antenna Structure extends more than eight feet (81) above the principal building on the same lot. E. The following uses shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter, so long as the Antenna Structure complies with all other zoning requirements: 1. Any Antenna Structure that is designed and used solely to receive UHF, VHF, AM, and FM broadcast signals from licensed radio and television stations. 2. Any Antenna Structure that is designed and used solely in connection with authorized operations of an amateur radio station licensed by the FCC (i.e., a "HAM" radio transmission) . 17.42.040 DISTANCES. For the purpose of this Chapter, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed Major Facility to the relevant property line at a point five (5) feet above ground level. 17.42.050 REGULATIONS FOR BOTH MAJOR AND MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. A. Both Major and Minor Facilities shall be erected, located, Mounted, operated and maintained at all times in compliance with this Chapter and all applicable laws and regulations of the City, the State of California, and the United States of America. {3000:.2 \\MOR PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Corn Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 9 B. Both Major and Minor Facilities are conditionally permitted as a Wireless Communications Facility in the applicable zoning district as set forth in Section 17.20.050, Table 17.20.050, and Section 17.20.060, Table 17.20.060, of the Moorpark Zoning Code. C. Application Requirements and Procedures. 1. Both Major and Minor Facilities proposed to be erected, located, Mounted, operated and maintained at all times shall require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) . Each applicant applying for a CUP shall submit a completed CUP application in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 17.44 of the Moorpark Zoning Code, and such additional or different requirements as are made applicable by this Chapter. 2. The scaled Site Plan and Facility Elevations required for the City CUP application shall include the following information: a. The proposed location of the Wireless Communications Facility including access; b. The elevations of the Wireless Communications Facility with dimensions identified; structure(s); C. The height of any existing or proposed d. The location of any Accessory Equipment; e. The location of all guy- wires; f. The location of all above and below ground wiring and connection cables; g. The location of existing or proposed easements on the property; h. The height of any panels, microwave dishes, or whip antennas, above ground level; i. The distance between the Antenna Structure and any existing or proposed Accessory Equipment; and j. Any other necessary information as may be required by the Director of Community Development. 000013 \\MOR_PRl_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 10 3. Any application that is improperly submitted or fails to contain all of the information as required by the Moorpark Zoning Code, including this Chapter, shall be deemed incomplete. 4. Each application shall contain a letter of justification accompanied by written documentation that explains and validates the applicant's efforts to locate the Facility in accordance with the screening and site selection guidelines set forth in Paragraph (D) of this Section. 5. Each application shall contain a narrative and map that discloses the exact location and nature of any and all existing Facilities that are owned, operated or used by the applicant within the City of Moorpark, or within five (5) miles of its geographic borders, as well as any proposed or planned sites that may reasonably be known to the applicant at the time the application is made. 6. Each application shall contain a narrative and appropriate maps that disclose the geographic area(s) within the City of Moorpark that will be serviced by the proposed Facility, the geographic area(s) bordering the City of Moorpark, if any, that will be serviced by the proposed Facility, the nature of the service to be provided or purpose of the Facility, the reasons, if any, why the applicant cannot locate the Facility outside the City of Moorpark, and the efforts, if any, that applicant has made to locate the Facility outside the City of Moorpark. 7. Each application shall contain a radio - frequency (RF) report prepared by a qualified RF engineer acceptable to the City to demonstrate that the proposed Facility, as well as any Colocated Facilities, complies with current Federal RF emission standards. This RF report shall also include signal strength exhibits. 8. Each application shall contain computerized visual assessments or other exhibits equivalent in a form and manner acceptable to the Director of Community Development showing the before and after visual appearances of the proposed Facility. 9. Each application shall contain a description of the required maintenance visits to the site and security proposed to protect the site from vandalism and trespass. 0000 \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Corn Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 11 10. Each application shall contain a preliminary environmental review in accordance with the City submittal requirements, with special emphasis placed upon the nature and extent of visual, public, health, and safety impacts to the extent permitted by Federal law. 11. Each application shall contain evidence of any required licenses and approvals to provide Wireless Services in the City. 12. Notwithstanding any permit that may be granted in accordance with this Chapter, the Facility shall be erected, located, Mounted, operated and maintained at all times in compliance with this Chapter and all applicable laws, regulations and requirements of the Building Code, and every other code and regulation imposed or enforced by the City of Moorpark, the State of California, and the United States Federal Government. Applicants are separately required to obtain all applicable building and construction permits that may be required prior to erecting or installing the Facility. 13. The Director of Community Development shall determine applicable entitlement processing fees and deposits for the application, as established by City Council resolution, including any applicable contract staff fees and /or deposits for the purpose of peer review of the CUP application submittals. D. General Development Requirements. The Facility shall comply with each of the following requirements: 1. A Facility shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other than certification, public safety, warning, or other required seals or required signage. 2. Any and all Accessory Equipment, or other equipment associated with the operation of the Facility, including but not limited to transmission cables, shall be located within a building, an enclosure, or underground vault in a manner that complies with the development standards of the zoning district in which such equipment is located. In addition, if equipment is located above ground, it shall be visually compatible with the surrounding buildings and either shrouded by sufficient landscaping to screen the equipment from view, or designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If Accessory Equipment will be visible from a residential area or an arterial street, the applicant shall \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 12 provide a solid masonry block wall that will screen the equipment from the residential area or another material, such as landscaping, that is acceptable to the Director of Community Development. If no recent and /or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Director of Community Development may require a particular design that is deemed suitable to the subject location. 3. The Facility's exterior finish shall be comprised of non - reflective material(s) and painted, screened, or camouflaged to blend with the materials and colors of surrounding buildings, structures, topography and vegetation. 4. All screening used in connection with a Wall Mounted and /or Roof Mounted Facility shall be compatible with the architecture, color, texture, and materials of the building or structure to which it is attached. 5. Facilities may not be illuminated unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other governmental agencies. 6. The applicant and the property owner if different from the applicant shall consent to future Colocation of other Facilities on or with the applicant's Facility, unless technological requirements preclude that Colocation. E. Setback Requirements and Guidelines. If the Facility is proposed to be located in an Open Space, Agricultural or Residential zone or within two hundred (200) feet of a residential use in any zone district, then the Facility shall at a minimum comply with the main structure setback requirements for such zone as specified in Tables 17.24.020A and 17.24.0203 of the Moorpark Zoning Code, with the exception of Utility Mounted Facilities, if all other requirements in Sections 17.42.070.B, 17.42.070.C, and 17.42.070.D can be met. In Commercial and Industrial zones, the Facility shall at a minimum comply with the building setback requirements from the edge of roadway right -of -way as specified in Table 17.24.020B of the Moorpark Zoning Code, with the exception of Utility Mounted Facilities, if all other requirements in Sections 17.42.070.13, 17.42.070.C, and 17.42.070.D can be met. In all instances, the determination of need for a larger setback for the Facility shall be considered by the City in connection with the processing of the CUP. \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 13 F. Screening and Site Selection Guidelines. In addition to the above requirements, the City shall consider the following factors in conjunction with the processing of a CUP. 1. The proposed Facility shall be designed to either be a Disguised Facility or Stealth Facility, taking into consideration alternate sites that are available, including Colocation. 2. The proposed Facility :lhei:aldshall be screened or camouflaged by existing or proposed new topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures. Any such improvements shall be appropriate for and compatible with the site and surrounding area. 3. The total size of the proposed Facility she�ild shall be compatible with surrounding and supporting structures. 4. If feasible, the location of the proposed Facility she',ld shall conform to the following in order of preference: a. Colocated with an existing Facility or located at a pre- approved location; b. Attached to an existing structure such as an existing building, communication tower, church steeple or utility; C. Located in an industrial zoning district; d. Located in a commercial zoning district. 5. Proximity of the proposed Facility to residential structures and to boundaries of residentially zoned districts. -76. The nature of existing uses on adjacent and nearby properties. $7. Proposed ingress and egress to the Facility. 17.42.060 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR ALL WIRELESS FACILITIES. \\MOR PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 14 A. Wireless Communications Facilities Findings. In addition to the required findings for Conditional Use Permits contained in Section 17.44.030.A.2 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code, the following Findings are required for every Major and Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Wireless Communications Facilities: 1. That the proposed Facility will not create any significant blockage to public views; and 2. That the proposed Facility will be an enhancement to the City due to its ability to provide additional communication capabilities; and 3. That the proposed Facility will be aesthetically integrated into its surrounding land uses and natural environment; and 4. That the proposed Facility will comply with FCC regulations regarding interference with the reception or transmission of other Wireless Service signals within the City and surrounding community; and 5. That the proposed Facility will operate in compliance with all other applicable Federal regulations for such Facilities, including safety regulations; and 6. That the public need for the use of the Facility has been documented. 7. That the applicant will provide at its own expense a field survey or other method to provide written verification that the Facility is in compliance with applicable Federal regulations regarding electromagnetic frequency emissions. Such field survey shall be provided to the City upon request, not to exceed one such request in any 24 -month period. B. If the Planning Commission does not approve an application for such Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission shall make a written determination supported by findings as required by 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iii). 17.42.070 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR MINOR FACILITIES. In addition to the requirements of Sections 17.42.040 and 17.42.060 of this Chapter, the following requirements shall apply to the following types of Facilities: 100008 \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Corn Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 15 A. Minor Facility Height Requirements. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Moorpark Zoning Code, no Minor Facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable zoning district unless such Facility receives Planning Commission approval, has been designed as a Disguised or Stealth Facility, and: 1. The applicant demonstrates that exceeding the height limitation is necessary for operation of the Facility; or 2. The Facility is Colocated, or contains adequate space suitable for future Colocation, and the height in excess of zoning requirements is necessary to the proposed shared use. B. Utility Mounted Facilities - Vertical Extensions. A Utility Mounted Facility may, if approved by the Planning Commission, exceed the maximum building height limit for the applicable zoning district. The extent that the Utility Mounted Facility exceeds the height of the existing utility pole or structure and the need for such height increase shall be taken into consideration by the City in conjunction with the processing of the CUP for the Utility Mounted Facility. C. Utility Mounted Facilities - Horizontal Extension. The extent that the Utility Mounted Facility protrudes or extends horizontally from the existing utility pole or structure shall be taken into account by the City in conjunction with its processing of a CUP for a Utility Mounted Facility. A Utility Mounted Facility may not protrude or extend horizontally more than gh-eel thirty -six (36-14) inches from the existing utility pole or structure unless the applicant demonstrates a technical . . . . . . . . . . ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . need for such extension in order to provide service or to comply with. the requlati.ons and recuirements of the no.. e owner. . D. Additional Requirement for All Utility Mounted Facilities. Any Accessory Equipment accompanying or that forms part of the Utility Mounted Facility, and is located on the ground in the area surrounding the utility pole or structure, shall be visually compatible with the surrounding environment, shrouded by sufficient landscaping to screen the Accessory Equipment from view, and designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If Accessory Equipment will be visible from a residential area or an arterial street, the applicant shall provide a solid masonry block wall or another material, such as landscaping, that will screen the equipment from view, as determined acceptable by the Planning Commission. R=; \\MOR_PRI —SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 16 17.42.080 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR MAJOR FACILITIES. In addition to the requirements of Sections 17.42.050 and 17.42.060, the following requirements shall apply to the following types of Facilities: A. Location Requirements. 1. No portion or extension of a Major Facility shall protrude beyond property lines or extend into any portion of property where such Facility is not itself permitted; provided, however, that the City may approve the location of guy wires in a required setback if such approval is consistent with the guidelines and requirements set forth in this chapter. 2. Latticed Towers shall not be located in any Zone except M -2 and I, and shall not be located within two hundred (200) feet of any property containing a residential structure. 3. A Ground Mounted Facility shall not be located in a required parking area, vehicle maneuvering area, vehicle/ pedestrian circulation area or area of landscaping such that it interferes with, or in any way impairs, the utility or intended function of such area. 4. A Ground Mounted Facility shall not be permitted unless the reviewing authority makes the additional finding that, based upon evidence submitted by the applicant, no existing building or support structure can reasonably accommodate the proposed Facility. Evidence supporting this finding will be reviewed by the reviewing authority and may consist of any of the following: a. No existing buildings or support structures are located within the geographic area proposed to be served by the applicant's Facility. b. Existing buildings or support structures are not of sufficient height or structural strength to satisfy the applicant's operational or engineering requirements. C. The applicant's proposed Facility would create electromagnetic interference with another Facility on an existing structure, or the existing Facility on a building or support structure would create interference with the applicant's proposed Facility. 00001020 \\M0R— PR1_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 17 d. The costs, fees, or contractual provisions required by a property owner, or by an incumbent Wireless Service provider, in order to Colocate a new Facility on an existing building or structure, or to adapt an existing building or structure for the location of the new Facility, are unreasonable. e. There are other limiting factors that render existing buildings and structures unsuitable for use by the applicant. 5. If the proposed Major Facility cannot be Colocated, it must be sited at least 1,500 feet from any existing Major Facility unless the reviewing authority determines that a shorter distance is required for technological reasons, or that it would result in less visual obtrusiveness in the surrounding area. B. Additional Design Requirements. 1. A Ground Mounted Facility shall be secured from access by the general public with a fence of a type or other form or screening approved by the Planning Commission. 2. A Ground Mounted Facility shall be covered with a clear anti - graffiti material of a type approved by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may grant an exception to this requirement if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that there is adequate security around the Facility to prevent graffiti. C. Height Requirements. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Moorpark Zoning Code, no Major Facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable zoning district in which the Facility is proposed to be located, nor shall a Roof Mounted Facility exceed the height of the structure on which it is mounted by more than the minimum amount necessary for operation and safety, not to exceed ten (10) feet. Any application for a permit exceeding these height limits shall not be approved unless the Planning Commission determines that the Major Facility has been designed as a Disguised or Stealth Facility and: 1. The applicant demonstrates that exceeding the height limitation is reasonably necessary for operation of the Facility; or se�E \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 18 2. The Facility is Colocated, or contains adequate space suitable for future Colocation, and the excess in height is reasonably necessary to the proposed shared use. D. Additional Screening and Site Selection Guidelines. The following screening and site selection guidelines shall be considered by the City in conjunction with the processing of all Major Facility CUPS: 1. A Major Facility eh euld shall not be located ..... _ ....... ......._. .... .... _.......... within two hundred (200) feet of any property containing a residential use. 2. If technical data require the placement of a Major Facility to be located within 1,500 feet of an existing Major Facility, under Subsection 17.42.080.A.5, the new Major Facility sheuld shall be located at least five hundred (500) feet from the existing Major Facility. 3. A Ground Mounted Facility— shall be located in close proximity to existing above ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility poles (not scheduled for removal or undergrounding in the next eighteen (18) months) , light poles, trees of comparable height, water tanks and other areas where the Facility will not detract from the image or appearance of the City. 4. A Roof Mounted Facility that extends above the existing parapet of the building on which it is mounted eheu]t -d :ha .1 be screened by a material and in a manner that is — . . . . . . .. . . ................ compatible with the existing design, color and architecture of the building. 5. A Roof Mounted Facility, requiring the placement of any guy wires, supporting structures, or Accessory Equipment -sh- anal -d —shall be located and designed so as to minimize the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . visual impact as viewed from surrounding properties and public streets, including any pertinent public views from higher elevations. 6. No part of a Ground Mounted Facility be located in any required setback. 17.42.090 PUBLIC PROPERTY FACILITIES. A. Pre - Approved Locations. Di \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Corn Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 19 1. The City may approve by Resolution, following a duly noticed public hearing, a list of sites located on public property or within the public right -of -way and which are approved for Minor and Major Facilities. Each site shall include a description of permissible development and design characteristics, including but not limited to maximum height requirements. The City shall make said Resolution available to all persons upon request. The approved list of locations may be subsequently amended by Resolution from time to time. 2. All Facilities located on a public property site, which is pre- approved in accordance with this Section following the effective date of this Ordinance, must obtain approval of an GU-P--Administrative Permit in accordance with the Moorpark Zening Municipal Code Chapter 17.44, and any additional or different requirements made applicable by this Chapter. 3. All leases of a public property that is pre - approved in accordance with this Section shall be non - exclusive. The operator of a Facility located on such public property shall make the supporting structure of the Facility available to any other applicant wishing to Colocate to the extent technically feasible. B. Requirement for Separate Lease Agreement. Any lease of City -owned property for the purpose of erecting a Wireless Communications Facility shall require a negotiated lease agreement or other written license granted by the City of Moorpark. The existence of a lease agreement or license shall not relieve an applicant of any obligations to obtain appropriate permits hereunder or otherwise comply with the Moorpark Zoning Code. 17.42.100 APPEAL OR REVIEW AND NOTICES. Any applicant —er, the operator and /or owner of a Facility, or member of the City Council may appeal a final decision of the Director of Community Development or the Planning Commission. All appeals shall be processed in accordance with Moorpark Zoning Code Section 17.44.090 including payment of required fees. 17.42.120 RESERVATION OF RIGHT TO REVIEW PERMITS. A. Changed Circumstance. Any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved pursuant to this Chapter shall be granted or 000023 \\MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 20 approved by the City and its Planning Commission with the reservation of the right and jurisdiction to review and modify the permit (including the conditions of approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the following in relation to the approved Facility as described and diagramed in the related Site Plan: increased height or size of the Facility; additional impairment of the views from surrounding properties; change in the type of antenna or supporting structure; changed color or materials; substantial change in location on the site; and an effective increase in signal output above or near the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits imposed by the Revised Radio frequency Emissions Guidelines by the Federal Communications Commission. B. Additional Right to Revoke for Violation. The reservation of right to review any permit granted or approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Commission and /or City Council is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission and /or City Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such permit pursuant to Section 17.44.070 of the Moorpark Zoning Code. C. Modification of Permit /Colocation. Upon review, any changed circumstance as determined by the Director of Community Development shall require the application and approval of a modification to the original Conditional Use Permit, provided that any modification to accommodate Colocated Facilities may be approved administratively without the approval of the Planning Commission. 17.42.120 FACILITY REMOVAL. A. Discontinued Use. The operator of a lawfully erected Facility, and the owner of the premises upon which it is located, shall promptly notify the Director of Community Development in writing in the event that use of the Facility is discontinued for any reason. In the event that discontinued use is permanent, then the owner(s) and /or operator(s) shall promptly remove the Facility, repair any damage to the premises caused by such removal, and restore the premises as appropriate so as to be in conformance with applicable zoning codes. All such removal, repair and restoration shall be completed within ninety (90) days after the use is discontinued, and shall be performed in accordance with all applicable health and safety requirements. For purposes of this paragraph, a discontinued \\M0R_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 21 use shall be permanent unless the Facility is likely to be operative and used within the immediately following three -month period. B. Abandonment. A Facility that is inoperative or unused for a period of six (6) continuous months shall be deemed abandoned. An abandoned Facility shall be a public nuisance, subject to abatement pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1.12 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. To facilitate removal of an abandoned Facility, all Wireless Communications Facility projects shall be conditioned to require a surety be provided to the City prior to building permit approval to guarantee removal of equipment and structures if the City determines the Facility to be abandoned and a public nuisance. C. Utility Mounted Facility Removal or Relocation. f i ew -aAl1 Utility Mounted Facilities shall be beod3t- �i eE v .. �i ±. Fe ... e val removed or aaele ac e relocated at the Facility owner's expense when a City- approved project requires relocation or undergrounding of the utility structure on which the Facility is mounted. Any CUP or Administrative Permit for a Utility Mounted Facility shall be conditioned to require such removal or relocation at the f-Facility owner's ................................................................................................................................... ............................... ...................................................................................................................—................................................... ............................... _........................ expense, to require reimbursement of the City's costs and expenses to remove or relocate the Facility if the Facility owner refuses to remove or relocate the Facility when required, and to waive any claims damage or loss (including, but not limited to, consequential damages) resulting from the City's removal or relocation of the Facility. 17.42.130 TEMPORARY USE DURING DECLARED EMERGENCY. A. Temporary Use. The Director of Community Development or City Emergency Operations Center Director shall have the authority to approve a Temporary Use Permit for Wireless Communications Facilities needed during a declared emergency. The Temporary Use Permit shall contain the conditions for removal of the temporary Facilities as soon as possible after the conclusion of the declared emergency." SECTION 3. Chapter 17.08, Section 17.08.010 is hereby amended to add the following definition: `'Wireless Communications Facility' means an Antenna Structure and any appurtenant Facility or Accessory Equipment located within City limits and that is used in connection with D11 \\M0R_PRl_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 22 the provision of Wireless Service as is defined in Chapter 17.42 of this Code." SECTION 4. Chapter 17.20 is hereby amended consistent with Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to amend Table 17.20.050 to add "Wireless Communications Facility" with a footnote regarding specific regulations for this use. SECTION 5. Chapter 17.20 is hereby amended consistent with Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to amend Table 17.20.060 to add "Wireless Communications Facility" with a footnote regarding specific regulations for this use. SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Chapter, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 8. Ordinance No. 275, which extended a moratorium on the issuance of permits for construction or placement of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, is hereby repealed upon the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION $9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. \\MOR_PRI —SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Ordinance No. Page 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk day of Patrick Hunter, Mayor Attachments: Exhibit A - Revised Table 17.20.050 Exhibit B - Revised Table 17.20.060 2002. 000027 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \020116 CC Mtg Draft Wireless Com Facilities Ord.doc Revised Table 17.20.050 Section 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural and special purpose zones. Permitted uses in open space, agricultural and special purpose zones are set out in Table 17.20.050. Note: An approved residential planned development permit is required for five (5) or more lots in the RA, RO, R -1 and RE zones. The key for Table 17.20.050 is as follows: [Blank] Not permitted ♦ Permitted by zone clearance ■ Administrative permit • Planning commission - approved planned development permit 0 City council- approved planned development permit O Planning commission - approved conditional use permit City council - approved conditional use permit Table 17.20.050 PERMITTED USES IN OPEN SPACE, AGRICULTURAL AND SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES EXHIBIT A 000028 OS AE RA RE RO R1 R2 RP D TP I Agriculture and agricultural operations (no retail except as indicated). Animal husbandry: Without structures With structures: total GFA per lot: Up to 1,000 sq. ft. Over 1,000 to 5,000 sq. ft. ♦ ♦ O Over 5,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. ♦ ♦ O Over 20,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. O O Over 100,000 sq. ft. O O Apiculture Fish farms O O O O O More animals than are permitted by Section 17.28.030C O O O Contractors2 service and storage yards and buildings O O O Crop production ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Wholesale nursery ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O Firewood operations O O O Greenhouse, hothouses and the like: total GFA per lot:2 Up to 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. ♦ ♦ O 20,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. O O O Over 100,000 sq. ft. O O Packing or prelim. processing, within structures: total GFA per lot:3 Up to 5,000 sq. ft 5,001 to 20,000 sq. ft. • • O 20,001 to 100,000 sq. ft. O O O Over 100,000 sq. ft. O Timber growing and harvesting, and compatible uses Dwellings, farm worker (more than one per lot) O O O EXHIBIT A 000028 Revised Table 17.20.050 Wineries Up to 2,000 sq. ft. structure 2,001 to 20,000 s . ft. structure O O O Over 20,000 s . ft. structure O O O With public tours or tasting rooms O O O Accessory structures To animal husbandry: SEE WITH STRUCTURES, ABOVE Dwelling, caretaker O O O More than one per lot O O O Offices O O O To crop production, including storage SEE GREENHOUSE Dwelling, farm worker: On lots of 40 acres or more O O O On lots less than 40 acres O O O More than one per lot O O O Offices O O O Produce stands, retail Accessory uses, including open storage Fuel storage Insecticides for pest control Packing, storage or prelim. processing of crops: Without structure) Airfields and landing pads and strips, private O O O O O Animals, nonagricultural (see also Dwellings, accessory uses and structures)[ SEE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY Kennels O O O Wild animals O Boardinghouses and bed - and - breakfast inns O O O O O O Care facilities (see also H &SC and W &IC Day: Care of 12 or fewer persons (State law requirement related to day care facilities for 7 - -12) Care of 13 or more persons O O O O O O O Intermediate: Care of 7 or more persons see definitions O O O O O O Residential: Care of 6 or fewer persons ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • Care of 7 or more persons O O O O O O Cemeteries O O O O O O O O Accessory crematoria, columbaria and mausoleums O O O Churches, synagogue and other buildings used for religious worship O O O O O O O Clubhouses no alcoholic beverages) O O O O O O Communications facilities O O O O O O O O O O Drilling, temporary geologic (testing only) O O O O O Dwelling, single - family ' (R -P -D zone) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • Mobilehome, continuing nonconforming O O O O O O O O Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 0 0 0 Dwellings, two - family, or two single- ♦ • 000029 Page 2 of 5 Revised Table 17.20.050 family dwellings Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 0 0 Dwelling s, multifamily • Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 0 Dwellings, accessory structures For human habitation: Mobilehome /RV as temporary dwelling during construction ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Second dwelling2 ■ Room additions ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Not for human habitation (with or without bathroom): Second story patio/deck ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Accessory structure over 120 s . ft. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Over 1,000 sq. ft. per structure; or over 2,000 s . ft. per lot O O O O O O O O Antenna, ground- mounted (noncommercial), above 40 ft.z O O O O O O O O O Dwellings, accessory uses Animals Apiculture Aviaries O O O O Farm animals (other than horses/ ones ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O Horses/ponies2 O Pet animals More animals than are permitted by Section 17.28.030C O O O O O O O Wild animals O O O Commercial uses, minor, for project residents • Home occupation ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Storage, open ' Education and training Colleges and universities O O Schools, elementary and secondary (boarding and nonboardin ) O O O O O O O Energy production from renewable sources O O O O Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor O O O Government buildings O O O O O O O O Correctional institutions O Fire stations O 1 O O O O O O O O Law enforcement facilities O O O O O O O Grading Within an overlay zone SEE CHAPTER 17.36 Hospitals O O Hospitals for large animals O O Libraries O O O O O O O Mineral resource development O O O Mining and accessory uses2 O O O Less than 9 months in duration O O O O Page 3 of 5 00003v Revised Table 17.20.050 Public works maintenance Oil and gas exploration and production' O O O O Mobilehome arks O O O O O O Model homes /lot sales'; 2 years More than 2 years O O O O O O Motion picture and TV production, and related activities and structures O O O O O O O O O Temporary (maximum 42 days in any 180-day period) 1,2 Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground 2 O O O O O O O O O O Public utility facilities, excluding offices and service yards' O O O O O O O O O O Recreational sport and athletic facilities Cams O O O Campgrounds 2 O O O O Community centers O O O O O For farm workers and nonprofit farm community organizations O O O Fields, athletic O O O O O O Geothermal spas Golf courses, except miniature of O O O O O O O O Parks ♦ 1 O ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 0 O With buildings O O O O O O O O O Periodic outdoorsporting events * O Recreational vehicle parks 2 O O O Recreation projects, city- initiated Caretaker recreational vehicle, accessor Retreats : Without sleeping facilities O O O With sleeping facilities O O O O Riding stables O O O O With accessory lodging facilities O O Shooting ranges and gun clubs Signs (see also Section 17.20.040 and Chapter 17.40) Storage of building materials, tem ora 2 Trees and native vegetation: Removal, relocation or damage I Within an overlay zone SEE CHAPTER 17.36 Uses and structures, accessory (other than to a ric. animals or dwellings) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O O To a use requiring a PD permit or CUP Dwelling, caretaker SEE SECTION 17.44.080A Waste treatment and disposal O O O O O Water production, storage and distribution facilities: Private purveyors ' O O O O O O O O O O Wireless communications facilities5 O O O O O O O O O O Notes for Table 17.20.050: Page 4 of 5 000 Revised Table 17.20.050 1. See also Section 17.20.040. 2. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28. 3. See Chapter 17.32 for parking standard. 4. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations. 5. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.42, including an Administrative Permit requirement for a pre - approved location on public property. (Ord. 264 § 2 (part), 1999; Ord. 196 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -4), 1994) Page 5 of 5 Revised Table 17.20.060 Section 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones are set out in Table 17.20.060. Note: All uses located in the M -1 and M -2 zones which at the property line are adjacent to residentially zoned property shall require a city council- approved conditional use permit prior to occupancy of the building. The key for Table 17.20.060 is as follows: [Blank] Not permitted ♦ Permitted by zone clearance • Planning commission - approved planned development permit 0 City council- approved planned development permit O Planning commission- approved conditional use permit City council- approved conditional use permit 0 Administrative permit required Temporary use permit Table 17.20.060 PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES EXHIBIT B C2 CO C1 CPD M1 M2 I C -OT Airfields and landing ads and strips, private O O O Airports O O Alcoholic bevera e Establishments selling beer and/or wine with an eating lace 0 0 0 0 0 0 Establishments selling alcoholic beverages other than beer and wine with an eating lace f f f fo Amusement and recreational facilities (see definitions in Ch. 17.08) • O • Amusement parks and carnivals O 1 O Arcades O O Batting cages and golf driving ranges, indoor O O Bicycle racing tracks, outdoor O O Health club/ gymnasium (see definitions ) • • O Martial arts and dance studios • • O Motion picture theaters, outdoor (drive -in) O O Racetracks (for motorized vehicles), shooting ranges and stadiums PROHIBITED Art galleries, museums and artisan workshops ♦ 10 • O • Automobile repair, including component repair Automobile service stations • • Banks and related financial offices and institutions • • • • Barber, hairstylists, manicurists • Tanning centers • Bars, taverns and nightclubs O O Botanical gardens • O • Care facilities: For 7 or more persons (see also H &SC and W &IC Da • • • • • Intermediate and residential O O O EXHIBIT B Revised Table 17.20.060 Care facilities: For 9 or more persons (Day) O Car washes, self - service or automatic O O Cemeteries, columbaria and mausoleums O O O Crematoria, accessory O O O Churches, synagogues and other buildings used for religious worship 5 O • • O O O Clubhouses O • O O O O With alcoholic beverages • O O O O Club projects, temporary outdoor O O O O Communications facilities O O O O O O O Radio and television broadcasting stations O • • O O Conference center /convention center O O Contractor service and storage yards and buildings • Crop production Firewood operations O O Uses and structures, accessory Dwelling, farm worker maximum one per lot O O Fuel storage Offices O O Packing, preliminary processing, or storage of crops: Without structures4 Produce stands, retail Dog and cat grooming • O Dressmaking and tailor shops • Drilling, temporary eolo is (testing only) O O Dwelling for superintendent or owner • Dwelling, caretaker O Education and training Colleges and universities O • O Schools: Elementary and secondary (nonboarding onl z,3 • • • • • O Schools: Professional, vocational, art, craft and self-improvement O O • • O Energy production from renewable sources O O Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor O O A, Government buildings, excluding correctional institutions • • • • O Fire stations • • • O O O Libraries and information center • Grading Within an overlay zone SEE CHAPTER 17.36 Grading not in conjunction with a development project Less than 5,000 cubic yards More than 5,000 cubic yards O Health club/ gymnasium (see definitions ) • Health services such as professional offices and outpatient clinics • • • O O Ambulance services O • • O Hospitals O O O Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only • • • Page 2 of 7 0000,34 Revised Table 17.20.060 Hotels, motels and bed - and - breakfast inns • • Kennels (animal hospitals, boarding and grooming--small animals) O Laboratories: research and scientific • • Medical and dental • • • • Laundry service (laundromats Laundry service (light) • Libraries and information center • • • +� Manufacturing associated with crafts and artisans Assembly, exhibits, demonstration O Manufacturing industries Apparel and related products • • Dressmaking and tailor shops • • Chemicals, gases and related products (see. definitions), excluding nerve gas Drugs, pharmaceuticals, perfumes, cosmetics and the like • • Soaps, detergents and cleaners Electrical and electronic machinery, equipment and supplies • • Batteries O Household appliances O • Transmission and distribution equipment, and industrial apparatus O • Food and related products O • Alcoholic beverages Bakery products • • Meat, seafood and poultry packing plants O Slaughtering; refining and rendering of animal fats and oils Sugar refining Furniture and related fixtures • Instruments: measuring, analyzing and controlling • • Jewelry, silverware and plated ware • • Laundry service -- laundromats Laundry service- -light Laundry service- -heavy Leather and leather products • • Tanning, curing and finishing of hides and skins Lumber and wood products and processes • Cabinet work • • Plywood, particleboard and veneer manufacture; wood preserving Sawmills and planing mills Machinery, except electrical • Office, computing and accounting machines • • Metal industries, primary Rolling, drawing and extruding O Metal products, fabricated • Ammunition Machine shops • • Plating, polishing, anodizing, engraving and related operations O • Page 3 of 7 Revised Table 17.20.060 Musical instruments, including pianos and organs • • Paper and related products Products from paper and paperboard, including containers • • Pens, pencils and other office and artists materials • • Personal goods • • Petroleum refining and related industries Photographic, medical and optical goods, and watches and clocks • • O Printing, publishing and related industries • • Print shops (up to 1,500 s . ft. of gross floor area) • Rubber and plastics products O Tire retreading and recapping • Signs and advertising displays • • Stone, clay and glass products O Asbestos products Cement, concrete and plaster, and products fabricated therefrom O Glass and glassware, pressed and blown, including flat glass Glass products, made of purchased glass • • Rock crushing and sandblasting plants Textile mill products Tobacco products • Toys and amusement, sporting and athletic goods • • Transportation equipment O Motorcycles, bicycles and related parts • Martial arts and dance studios • Mineral resource development Mining and accessory uses Less than 9 months in duration O O Public works maintenance Oil and gas exploration and production] O O Motion picture and TV production, and related activities and structures O O O O O O O Temporary (maximum 47 days in any 180 -day period) 1,4 Offices: business, professional and administrative, except health and veterinary • • • • O • Optical goods O Organizations (professional, religious, political, labor, trade, youth, etc. O Parks -- public Parking lots • • • • • O • Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only Photocopy/quick printers • Photofinishing 1 -hour hoto • Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground O O O O Produce stands, retail Propulsion (engine) testing Public utility facilities O O O O O O O Offices only • • • • • O • Page 4 of 7 000036 Revised Table 17.20.060 Service yards • O Recording studios and sound stages • O O Rental and leasing of durable goods O O O Bicycle rental • Repair and reconditioning services O O • Automobile body work and painting O O O Automobile repair, including component repair O O • Electrical and electronic machinery and equipment • • Heavy machinery repair, including trucks, tractors and buses • Instruments, including musical instruments • • Office, computing and accounting machines • • Photographic and optical goods • • Repair of personal goods such as jewelry, shoes and saddlery • • Restaurants, cafes and cafeterias • Restaurants, cafes and cafeterias temporary outside eating • • • • • Retail trade (see definitions in Chapter 17.08) includes retail -only nurseries and excludes lumber and building materials sales yards, pawnshops and liquor stores • Antique store ♦ 10 Outdoor sales area ! Outdoor sales area temporary Retail trade see definitions • • Christmas tree sales Feed stores O Lumber and building materials sales yards O O Mail order houses (nonstore ) • • Motor vehicle, mobilehome, recreational vehicle and boat dealers O Nurseries O Uses and structures, accessory SEE PRINCIPAL USE Outdoor sales and services, temporary (see definitions Repair of products retailed Salvage yards, including automobile wrecking yards Service establishments Business see definitions • • • Auction halls, not involving livestock O O • O Disinfecting and exterminating services O O O O Exhibits, building of • • O Sin painting and lettering shops • • • Personal see definitions • • Signs (See also Section 17.20.040 and Chapter 17.40) Freestanding off -site advertising signs O Swap meets O O O O Taxidermy • Transportation services (see definitions) O • Bus and train terminals O O Page 5 of 7 00003 - 7 Revised Table 17.20.060 Stockyards, not primarily for fattening or selling livestock Truck storage, overnight • Trees and native vegetation: removal, relocation or damage 4 Within an overlay zone SEE CHAPTER 17.36 Uses and structures, accessory SEE PRINCIPAL USE Dwelling, for superintendent or owner O O O O Dwelling, caretaker O O Game machines: three or fewer Recreational facilities, restaurants and cafes: for employees only • • Retail sale of products manufactured on -site Temporary buildings during construction Vaccination clinics, temporary, for pet animals Veterinary clinics, pet animals only' O O Warehousing and storage, including ministora e • • Automobile impound yards; dead storage of trucks, buses and the like Building materials, movers' equipment and the like: indoor • • Outdoor Fertilizer and manure Hazardous materials; including pesticides and herbicides Petroleum and gas (butane, propane, LPG, etc.); explosives and fireworks Recreational vehicles • Storage of building materials, temporary Waste treatment and disposal (see definitions) Recycling facilities and centers O • O Water production, storage and distribution facilities: Private purveyorS4,1 O O O ♦ ♦ O Wholesale trade • • Wireless communications facilitiesl1 O O O O O O O -7 Zoological gardens, animal exhibits and commercial aquariums O O Notes for Table 17.20.060: 1. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28. 2. If there is an existing planned development permit for the site, the school facility could be permitted by approval of a modification to the existing permit. 3. For M -1, M -2 and C -O zones, a school facility would only be permitted where sponsored by or permitted within an industrial or commercial use on the same site. 4. See also Section 17.20.040. 5. Churches located in existing buildings with an approved planned development permit will require a modification to that permit. 6. If existing industrial building has approved IPD, restaurant will require approved minor modification to IPD. 7. Restaurants with temporary outside eating facilities shall receive a modification to the planned Page 6 of 7 000038 Revised Table 17.20.060 development permit. 8. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations. 9. The establishment must be an otherwise permitted or conditionally permitted use in the zone. 10. Applicable only to those properties within the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone that have a base zoning of CO. 11. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.42, including an Administrative Permit requirement for apre- approved location can public property. (Ord. 265 § 2 (part), 1999; Ord. 247 § 1(E), 1998: Ord. 234 § 2, 1997; Ord. 233 § 3, 1997; Ord. 209 § 3, 1995; Ord. 200 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -5), 1994) Page 7 of 7 ITEM q. �• Af's':)�; i. Publ�liea, -1 'fo I- l/o -02. 4,d �ecF � �r.Lsdru�lt ex -� MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL oP MO¢a+erw►n 04- AGENDA REPORTS TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community Development Y ; lLLm_' �V DATE: November 29, 2001 (CC Meeting of 12/5/01) SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance Regulating Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Moorpark by Adding Chapter 17.42 and Amending Chapters 17.08 and 17.20 of Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2001 -03) BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 19, 2001, and adopted Resolution No. PC- 2001 -418 recommending approval of the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance as amended (see Attachment I to this report for Planning Commission Resolution and revised draft ordinance). The staff report submitted to the Planning Commission is included as Attachment II to this report and contains more detailed background information, including discussion of the interim moratorium ordinance. The moratorium on the acceptance and processing of permits as well as issuance of permits for construction or placement of Wireless Communications Facilities will expire on January 14, 2002, unless extended. Staff intends to include an item on the City Council's December 19, 2001 agenda to extend the moratorium until the new ordinance becomes effective (30 days after adoption). Staff modeled the draft ordinance under consideration after the City of Alhambra's ordinance, which has been in effect for approximately 18 months. Where the attached draft ordinance differs from the Alhambra ordinance is summarized in the Planning Commission report and in the following Discussion section. The draft ordinance submitted to the City Council with the Planning Commission Resolution (Attachment I) will add a new Chapter 17.42, ATTACHMENT Z. 000040 Honorable City Council December 5, 2001 Meeting Page 2 entitled "Wireless Communications Facilities," to the City's Zoning Code. In addition, a definition for Wireless Communications Facilities has been proposed to be added to the definitions section in Chapter 17.08, and the two tables which list the uses permitted by zone in Chapter 17.20 are also proposed to be revised to show Wireless Communications Facilities as requiring a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit (CUP). There are definitions and regulations for Minor and Major Facilities included in Chapter 17.42 and a Planning Commission CUP is required for both with the same application submittal requirements. The differences in the permitting process for Minor and Major Facilities are basically tied to how the facility is mounted (ground, building, utility, or roof) and the height, screening, and setback requirements. A Major Facility would be one with a higher aesthetic impact potential, such as ground mounted or roof mounted, may not be entirely screened from view, and the height may exceed the maximum building height of the zone. One example of a Major Facility is a Latticed Tower. Because of the higher aesthetic impact potential of a Major Facility, there is a recommended guideline included in the ordinance that a Major Facility should not be located within 200 feet of any property containing a residential use. As identified in the Planning Commission staff report, staff has determined that the proposed Zoning Code amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act based on Section 15308 of the State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). DISCUSSION Following is a summary of the issues raised at the Planning Commission public hearing on November 19, that were requested by the Planning Commission to be addressed by staff: • Add language to address application information to be submitted pertaining to access to a site and security. (See Attachment I, page 10 of draft ordinance.) • Consider whether an exemption should be included for "Microcell" technology. (Staff does not currently support an exemption, but has modified the Minor Facilities definition and setback language to allow such facilities to be approved with a Planning Commission CUP to address aesthetic concerns. See Attachment I, pages 4 and 12 of draft ordinance, and following discussion.) • Consider an Administrative Permit process for pre- approved locations addressed in Section 17.42.090 of draft ordinance. (No change made to draft ordinance, see following discussion.) 0000 Honorable City Council December 5, 2001 Meeting Page 3 • Add language to permit a temporary wireless communications facility to be approved when the City Council has declared a state of emergency. (See Attachment I, page 20 of draft ordinance for language allowing the Director of Community Development or City Emergency Operations Center Director to approve a Temporary Use Permit for Wireless Communications Facilities needed during a declared emergency.) • Add language requiring the posting of a bond for removal of equipment should provider go out of business and equipment is abandoned. (See Attachment I, page 20 of draft ordinance for language added regarding CUP conditions of approval for removal of an abandoned Facility, including a requirement that a surety be provided prior to Building Permit approval to guarantee removal of equipment and structures if the City determines the Facility to be abandoned and a public nuisance per Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. The Council may want to discuss whether a cash or bank account type of surety should be required, due to the problems associated with ensuring that a bond is not cancelled without notification to City.) • Review setback language in Section 17.42.050.E. (See Attachment I, page 12 of draft ordinance for edits to setback language to clarify setback when a Facility is proposed within 200 feet of a residential use.) • Make other minor corrections as discussed by staff at the November 19 public hearing. (See legislative format in Attachment I, draft ordinance, including editorial corrections.) The Planning Commission considered public testimony considering potential health and safety impacts and property value impacts. The Assistant City Attorney advised the Planning Commission that the City could not regulate such concerns and that the draft ordinance was primarily written so as to regulate aesthetic impacts. Letters were received from Verizon Wireless and from the legal counsel representing AT &T Wireless (see Attachment III). Verizon Wireless requested a continuance of the Planning Commission public hearing, which was not supported by staff or the Commission due to the pending expiration of the moratorium ordinance. The Assistant City Attorney advised the Planning Commission that no changes to the ordinance were appropriate in response to the AT &T Wireless comments. Representatives from Sprint gave verbal comments to the Planning Commission at the November 19 hearing. The Sprint representatives requested that "Microcell" technology be exempted and provided photo exhibits of existing "Microcell" installations (see Attachment III). To briefly summarize, the "Microcell" technology requested to be exempted by Sprint includes the attachment of antennas to existing utility poles (such as power 000042 Honorable City Council December 5, 2001 Meeting Page 4 poles, street lights and signal poles) along with a "Microcell" box also attached to a utility pole and a power distribution cabinet that is ground mounted and can be screened with landscaping. As summarized in the list of issues on the preceding page, staff is not recommending exempting Wireless Communication Facilities that are utility mounted, due to aesthetic concerns, although language has been added to the draft ordinance so as to not preclude these types of Minor Facilities. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to Chapter 17.20 to allow Wireless Communications Facilities in all zones with a Conditional Use Permit and did not recommend any change. The Commission concurred that there were sufficient controls in the draft ordinance (new Chapter 17.42) to allow such Facilities to be conditionally permitted in all zones with a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The City Council should also note that Lattice Towers are restricted by the language in the draft ordinance to only be conditionally permitted in the M- 2 (Limited Industrial) and I (Institutional) Zones. The Council may want to discuss whether any other zone districts would be appropriate for this type of a Major Facility. The Planning Commission also directed staff to schedule a Commission workshop, following City Council adoption of the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance, to discuss and provide recommendations for pre- approved locations as addressed in Section 17.42.090 of the draft ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. 2. Waive full reading and introduce Ordinance No. for first reading. 3. Direct staff to schedule extension of the moratorium ordinance for the December 19, 2001 regular meeting. Attachments: I. Planning Commission Resolution and Draft Ordinance II. Planning Commission Staff Report III. Letters from Verizon Wireless and AT &T and Sprint "Microcell Exhibits 000044 To: From: Date: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council ITEM 7. C. L1 t4'C� ,77� f 'r . 5 P' Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community Development � 1 January 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) Subject: Consideration of Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH- 1994081075), General Plan Amendment No. 99 -01, Zone Change No. 99 -01, Residential Planned Development No. 99 -02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5187, to Develop 250 Single - family Homes on a Portion of a 350 -acre Site, Located on the West Side of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately 3,500 feet North of Casey Road. Applicant: West Pointe Homes. (Continued with Public Hearing Open from City Council Meeting of December 19, 2001) BACKGROUND On October 3, 2001, the City Council opened the Public Hearing on the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Residential Planned Development and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, as noted above, for the proposed single - family residential project known as North Ranch at Moorpark, the applicant for which is West Pointe Homes. Located on the west side of Walnut Canyon Road (SR -23), approximately 3,500 feet north of Casey Road, this project proposes 250 single- family dwellings on a 350 -acre site comprised of level to steeply, sloping land (Assessors Parcel Numbers 500 - 260 -025, 045, 075, 085 and 095; 500 - 270 -90, 140, 155 and 165). The City Council subsequently held continued public hearings on October 17, November 7, November 19, December 5, and December 19, 2001. At the December 19 continued hearing, the Council primarily discussed the potential width of right -of -way and the cross section for "A" Street. The general Council consensus at the December 19 meeting was that "A" Street should be constructed as a modified arterial with an 84 foot right - of -way that would allow up to four travel lanes, a center median, two 8 -foot shoulders, two 5 -foot parkways, and two 5 -foot sidewalks. The proposed 12 -foot width multipurpose trail would be 000044 \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \a - West Pointe Homes \cc - 020116 stf rpt Westpointe Homes.doc Final EIR (SCH- 1994081075), GPA No. 99 -01, ZC No. 99 -01, RPD No. 99 -02 and VTT Map No. 5187, West Pointe Homes January 16, 2002 Page 2 provided adjacent to one side of the roadway right -of -way within a separate easement. At the December 19 meeting, the Council reviewed the applicant's exhibit showing the relocation of three lots as a result of the increase in the right -of -way width for "A" Street. The Council expressed concern regarding proposed new graded slopes for the relocated lots and requested that the applicant provide an exhibit to illustrate the visual appearance that would result from the grading for the relocated lots. A final decision was not reached on "A" Street, pending the receipt of the requested exhibit(s). DISCUSSION Included as an attachment to this report is the revised Vesting Tentative Map exhibit showing the "A" Street configuration with an 84 -foot right -of -way and relocated lots. The displaced three lots for the "A" Street widening have been relocated within the project without adding any additional grading or sloped areas (residential lot sizes were reduced in several areas to accommodate the relocation). The sections of the map where lot lines have been reconfigured are shown with shading on the attached exhibit. All other components of the project remain the same (including but not limited to recreation site locations, trails, and street configurations). The following approval documents will be provided under separate cover: • Resolution to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopt EIR Findings and approving the Mitigation Monitoring Program. • Resolution for the General Plan Amendment • Resolution for Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and Residential Development Permit, including conditions of approval. • Zone change ordinance. Staff is continuing to work on the draft conditions of approval to clarify timing for compliance, eliminate duplication, and correct inconsistencies between the conditions of approval, mitigation measures, and proposed Development Agreement. New conditions have been added pertaining to photovoltaic requirements, payment for crossing guard costs for five years, and requiring language in the CC &R's to notify future home buyers of the earthquake fault affecting specific lots within the tract. Following City Council discussion of any remaining issues or concerns, staff is recommending the public hearing should be continued to an Adjourned City Council meeting in January 2002 to \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \a - West Pointe Homes \cc - 020116 stfrI�f �� Westpointe Homes.doc �IJJ�VJ� 0 Final EIR (SCH- 1994081075), GPA No. 99 -01, ZC No. 99 -01, RPD No. 99 -02 and VTT Map No. 5187, West Pointe Homes January 16, 2002 Page 3 allow staff additional time to accomplish edits to final approval documents. At the Adjourned meeting, the public hearing should be closed and the resolutions, conditions of approval, and ordinance should be enacted in the following sequence: 1. Adoption of Resolution to Certify the EIR and approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program. 2. Adoption of Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment. 3. Introduce Zoning Ordinance for first reading. 4. Adoption of Resolution to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, to become effective upon the effective date of the Zoning Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. At the January 16, 2002 meeting, accept public testimony and continue the public hearing to an Adjourned City Council meeting in January 2002. 2. At the Adjourned City Council meeting, take the following approval actions: Adopt Resolution 2002- Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH 1994081075) and approving the Mitigation Monitoring Program; Adopt Resolution 2002- approving General Plan Amendment 99 -01; Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading adopting Zone Change 99- 01; Adopt Resolution 2002- approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5187 and Residential Planned Development Permit No.99 -02, subject to conditions of approval, and to become effective upon the effective date of the Zoning Ordinance; and authorize the City Manager to make final editorial corrections to final approval documents to achieve consistency. Attachment: Revised Vesting Tentative Map 000046 \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \a - West Pointe Homes \cc - 020116 stf rpt westpointe Homes.doc i rzCt r (a_) 8A r% SM AN orIiEc■ A.._ wo, w TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council ITEM rl • -'::� 0 i Lrned M_ f)F_,l -�3 -C> JJ P.Y: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City ClerkI Prepared By: La -Dell VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk January 10, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of Ordinance for Approval of Development Agreement No. 2001 -01 for West Pointe at North Ranch (General Plan Amendment 99 -01, Zone Change 99 -01, Residential Planned Development 99 -02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5187) on the Application of West Pointe Homes, Inc. (Continued Open Public Hearing from December 19, 2001) BACKGROUND At the City Council's meeting on December 19, 2001, the Council continued the open public hearing for Development Agreement No. 2001 -01 to January 16, 2002. DISCUSSION Discussions with the Developer are continuous and ongoing and staff recommends that this item be continued to an adjourned meeting. A new Development Agreement will be distributed to the City Council prior to the adjourned meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue to take public testimony; and 2. Continue the public hearing open to an adjourned meeting in January, 2002. 00(A)4b ITEM - of -" t�ODoC MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL 4 .!t4 t C intil AGENDA REPORT ��Yf: Ma���������►'}������� TO: Honorable City CouncilUa�cf.1�z -e—,c� FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community Development 1 Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Planner DATE: January 2, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/01) SUBJECT: Consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Appeal 2001 -05, Appealing Various Conditions Established by the Director of Community Development for Approval of Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10, to Allow a Second Dwelling Unit at 6086 Gabbert Road. (Applicant: Cindy Hollister) BACKGROUND At its hearing on December 19, 2001 the City Council heard Staff's report and recommendation and took public testimony regarding the appeal. The public hearing was continued so that Staff could address concerns raised by the City Council. Staff, in conjunction with the City Attorney, has undertaken a review of the Municipal Code, relevant provisions of State law, and the City's files concerning the property to respond to the issues raised at the last hearing. A detailed discussion of those issues follows. As a preliminary matter, however, it is important to note that the proceeding before the Council is an appeal of the conditions of approval imposed upon an Administrative Permit for a second dwelling unit. Many of the issues raised at the December 19 hearing are beyond the scope of the appeal. With regard to the appeal, Staff has confirmed that pursuant to Moorpark Municipal Code Section 17.28.020(C) and (G) (Attachments 1 and 2) the appropriate City permit for installation of a mobilehome as a second dwelling unit on the property is an S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc 000049 Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 2 Administrative Permit. At City direction, the Applicant has obtained such a permit, although she has appealed the associated conditions of approval. In preparation for this hearing, Staff has reviewed the conditions of approval and has recommendations concerning modification to those conditions, which Staff believes are less onerous on the Applicant, but still achieve the City's objective of ensuring the second unit is installed consistent with governing law. Those recommendations are set forth at the conclusion of this staff report. As to the mobilehome presently on site (the "Existing Mobilehome "), Staff has been advised by the Applicant that it was manufactured prior to June 15, 1976, although the Applicant has not allowed Staff to inspect the Existing Mobilehome. Installation of such a mobilehome on the property violates the City's ordinances (as discussed more fully below) . There are only three circumstances under which such a mobilehome might be able to be installed on the property, but it does not appear that the Existing Mobilehome qualifies for any of the three: 1) If the Existing Mobilehome was a legal, non - conforming structure. As discussed below, the mobilehome that preceded the Existing Mobilehome on the site was illegal, and thus could not pass any legal, non - conforming status on to the Existing Mobilehome. Further, the Applicant's voluntary removal of the original mobilehome and installation of the Existing Mobilehome would have eliminated any legal, non - conforming status, had such status existed. 2) If the Zoning Code was amended. Mobilehomes pre- dating June 15, 1976 can be installed with a code amendment. However, such an amendment would be inconsistent with federal standards, the intent of state law and detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of Moorpark, in the opinion of Staff. Staff has not been allowed to inspect the mobilehome, but given its exterior condition, would not advise a change in the City's codes to accommodate this structure. 3) If a variance was granted. The Applicant could apply for a variance from the Code requirements concerning manufacture date. However, the granting of a variance requires a determination that a strict application of the code will deny the Applicant a benefit that similarly situated persons enjoy, due to the unique characteristics of the Applicant's property. Staff does not believe such findings can be made. S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc 000050 Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 3 Accordingly, as detailed at the conclusion of this staff report, Staff is recommending that the Council deny the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision, but modify the conditions of approval to be less onerous on the Applicant. Thereafter, the Applicant will be legally entitled to install a mobilehome as a second unit on the property, provided that the conditions of approval are met, including, but not limited to, a manufacture date later than June 15, 1976 on the mobilehome. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES The concerns of the City Council were: prior actions and decisions by Staff; the non - conforming rights of the applicant; the code requirement regarding the age of the mobilehome; the maximum size allowable for a second dwelling unit on this site; and, whether or not Parcel Map 3359 was ever recorded. Issue 1, Prior actions and decisions by Staff: Staff's review of the City's files indicates that the following actions were taken by the City and property owner and /or tenant in connection with the second unit on the property. On July 21, 1994 a Zoning Clearance for a cargo container and horse boarding was approved. This application showed an existing "trailer double wide" on the lot. There is no record of a permit ever being granted for such a structure. On July 22, 1994 an application for a second dwelling on the site was approved, and then subsequently denied by the Community Development Director on July 27, 1994. At that time, the existing dwelling was shown at 1,240 square feet and the proposed second dwelling was shown as 480 square feet, exceeding the Moorpark Municipal Code's limitation that a second dwelling unit be no larger than thirty percent of the size of the primary unit. (Section 17.28.020(G)(1)(d)) (It is assumed that this is the unit that was voluntarily replaced with the Existing Mobilehome by the Applicant.) On November 18, 1994, a building permit (Permit # 5897) was issued to Portia Barberis for "mobilehome placement" on this lot. It is unclear as to whether Building and Safety was acting upon the July 22, 1994 Zoning Clearance or under some other authority. There was no record of the July 27, 1994 Zoning S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc 000051 Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 4 Clearance denial in the Building and Safety file. On February 6, 1995, a "Report of Compliance Review" was prepared by the Department of Community Development stating that the mobilehome used as a second dwelling unit has not met all ordinances and conditions of approval and should not be issued a Certificate of Occupancy. The reason given for disapproval was that the unit was "uninhabitable ". On June 1, 1995, a "Report of Compliance Review" prepared by the Department of Community Development was issued, stating that the project has met all ordinances and conditions of approval. It is assumed that all necessary repairs were made to the satisfaction of the Department of Community Development. The building permit was not finaled and on October 20, 1995 a notice was sent to the property owner stating that Permit # 5897 would expire within 10 days. No final inspection or certificate of occupancy was ever obtained under this building permit; therefore, this building permit expired and is considered null and void. In the absence of a valid building permit or a certificate of occupancy, the mobilehome was not a legally permitted structure on the site. Prior to November 2, 1999 the Applicant voluntarily removed the original mobilehome from the property and installed the Existing Mobilehome, without consultation with City staff, or issuance of any permits authorizing such installation. On November 2, 1999 the Applicant was contacted by code enforcement and advised to remove the illegal structure or obtain proper permits. On May 18, 2001 the applicant applied for an Administrative Permit, as required by the Moorpark Municipal Code, which was granted on August 8, 2001. On October 15, 2001 the Planning Commission heard an appeal of the conditions of approval imposed on the Administrative Permit and further modified those conditions. Staff contacted the previous planner, Craig Malin, who recalled this issue, but had minimal recollection of any discussions with the current applicant. Staff has reviewed Conditional Use Permit 3626, referenced by the Applicant and has determined that CUP is not relevant to the issues concerning the Existing Mobilehome. An application was S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc 000052 Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 5 made for CUP 3626 on May 20, 1976 for a one -day rodeo to be allowed on the site. This request was denied on July 1, 1976. No second dwelling unit was shown on the plans at that time. Issue 2, Non - conforming rights: As discussed above, the mobilehome on the site was installed, but never obtained a final inspection or certificate of occupancy and thus, was not a legally installed structure. Accordingly, no legal, non - conforming rights were obtained for that home. Had the mobilehome been properly installed and fully inspected, any non - conforming rights would have nonetheless been lost by the applicant's own actions. The voluntary removal of the prior mobilehome and placement of the existing mobilehome eliminated any legal, non - conforming rights which may have existed under the terms of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Section 17.52.070 of The Moorpark Zoning Code states: "The following provisions shall regulate the destruction of structures in the given situations: A. Uses Not Amortized. The following provisions shall apply to nonamortized, nonconforming structures and structures containing nonconforming uses not subject to amortization: 2. Whenever any such structure is voluntarily removed, damaged or destroyed to the extent of more than fifty percent (509) of its floor or roof area which existed before destruction, no structural alterations, repairs or reconstruction shall be made unless every portion of such structure and the use are made to conform to the regulations of the zone classification in which they are located." Therefore, even if the previous second dwelling unit had been legally installed, the applicant would have eliminated any legal, non - conforming rights by her voluntary removal and replacement of that structure. Any new structure must conform to all current codes. 000053 S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 6 Issue 3, Age of the Mobilehome: Section 17.28.020(C) of The Moorpark Zoning Code states: "1. Mobilehome Construction. Mobilehomes may be used as single - family dwellings if the mobilehome was constructed on or after June 15, 1976. Mobilehomes used as second dwellings are subject to this date limitation." There was discussion at the December 19, 2001 hearing as to where this date came from and its importance. In 1976 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) adopted preemptive federal regulations for the construction of mobilehomes (now referred to as "manufactured homes ") to comply with the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974. The HUD standards cover Body and Frame Requirements, Thermal Protection, Plumbing, Electrical, Fire Safety and other health and safety aspects of the home. They are published in the Code of Federal Regulations at 24 CFR 3280. No state, city, county or other local jurisdiction may adopt or impose any standard for the construction of a manufactured home. Cities can, however, adopt standards for the installation of mobilehomes. Mobilehomes (Manufactured Homes) must be allowed by the local authority if they meet minimum criteria established by the State of California, which criteria include a manufacture date after June 15, 1976 (see California Government Code Sections 65852.3 and 65852.4 in Attachments 3 and 4). However, the local authority may be even more restrictive and preclude establishment of mobilehomes over ten years of age at the time an application is made to install the mobilehome. There is no provision in state law that would prohibit a City from adopting a code that allowed the installation of structures, which predate June 15, 1976. However, such an ordinance would be contradictory to the intent of the federal and state statutes, which seek to protect the health and safety of persons by requiring certain minimum manufacturing standards in mobilehomes constructed after June 15, 1976. Accordingly, Staff would advise against such an ordinance in the City of Moorpark. S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 7 As the code is presently drafted, the City has elected to preclude establishment of mobilehomes that were constructed prior to June 15, 1976, consistent with the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 and California Government Code sections 65852.3 and 65852.4. The City has not taken the further restrictive step of limiting installation of mobilehomes to those that are less than ten years in age at the time an application is submitted, although it may be appropriate for Staff to explore the merits of a code amendment in that regard. Issue 4, Maximum Size Allowable for a Second Dwelling Unit: Section 17.28.020 (G)(1)(d) of the Moorpark Zoning Code states: "The maximum size of the second dwelling shall be limited to the more restrictive of either thirty percent (300) of the existing single - family dwelling floor space or the following lot size limitations: i.Lots ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet to twenty -one thousand seven hundred eighty (21,780) square feet -- a second dwelling shall not exceed eight hundred (800) square feet. ii. Lots twenty -one thousand seven hundred eighty - one (21,781) square feet to forty -three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet -- a second dwelling shall not exceed nine hundred (900) square feet. iii. Lots greater than one (1) acre to five (5) acres (two hundred seventeen thousand eight hundred (217,800) square feet) - -a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. iv. Lots greater than five (5) acres -- a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand one hundred (1,100) square feet." On December 28, 2001, the applicant allowed Staff to measure the area of the existing primary dwelling to determine the maximum size of a second dwelling unit that would be allowed. Planning Staff was accompanied by a Building and Safety Inspector and the Applicant during the measurement. It was determined that the existing dwelling is approximately 1,633 square feet in area. S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 8 This would allow a second dwelling of approximately 490 square feet in area. As stated earlier, the applicant did not allow Staff to inspect the mobilehome; therefore, it was impossible to determine its size. Issue 5, Parcel Map 3359: Staff has confirmed that Parcel Map 3359, dividing the property into two lots, was never recorded. Accordingly, notwithstanding the property is listed with two Assessor's Parcel Numbers in the County Assessor's Map, the property is still one legal lot. Accordingly, any mobilehome installed on the property would be a second unit, and the appropriate process for authorizing installation of such a second unit is by Administrative Permit. The Applicant has obtained such a permit and can install a mobilehome as a second unit on the property, provided that such home meets the conditions of approval and the code, including, but not limited to, the limitation on manufacture date. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff has reviewed the original approved Administrative Permit 2001 -10 and the approval as modified by the Planning Commission and feels that there is room for some flexibility in terms of modifying the conditions of approval. Several conditions are merely citations of code requirements that cannot be waived and were previously applied as conditions of approval in order to reinforce their importance. They can be removed as conditions of approval, but are fully enforceable as code requirements. Other conditions, such as the filing of certain covenants, although meritorious, are unnecessary if the applicant complies with code requirements. All conditions regarding additional parking spaces have been removed, as there has been no precedent set for such conditions based on the size of the second dwelling unit. There appears to be sufficient driveway parking on site to accommodate the needs of the residents and any visitors. The driveway access for the second unit must comply with Code and Fire Protection District requirements. The modified conditions of approval are provided as Attachment 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Continue the public hearing; accept public testimony; close the public hearing. 000056 S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc Honorable City Council 01/04/02 Page 9 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , sustaining the Planning Commission decision to Deny Appeal No. 2001 -05, and further modifying the conditions of approval. 3. Direct Staff to begin code enforcement action for removal of non - permitted mobilehome within ninety (90) days. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Moorpark Municipal Code 17.28.020(C) 2. Moorpark Municipal Code 17.28.020(G) 3. California Government Code 65852.3 4. California Government Code 65852.4 5. Draft Resolution with Modified Conditions of Approval 000057 S: \Community Development \Everyone \a - Appeal 2001 -07 Hollister \Appeal 2001.07 Hollister Cont (Modified).doc Moorpark Municipal Code 17.28.020 (C) C. Mobilehomes and Manufactured Housing. 1. Mobilehome Construction. Mobilehomes may be used as single- family dwellings if the mobilehome was constructed on or after June 15, 1976. Mobilehomes used as second dwellings are subject to this date limitation. 2. Mobilehome Foundation System. Mobilehomes which are used as single- family residences or as caretaker or farm worker dwellings shall be installed on a foundation system in compliance with Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 1333 of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Nonconforming mobilehomes renewed under a continuation permit shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 2, Article 7 of Title 25. 3. Exterior Siding. Exterior siding of a single- family dwelling shall extend to the ground level, or to the top of the deck or structural platform where the dwelling is supported on an exposed pile foundation complying with the requirements of Sections 2908 and 2909 of the Uniform Building Code, or to the top of a perimeter foundation. For mobilehomes used as caretaker or farm worker dwellings, manufactured mobilehome skirting shall completely enclose the mobilehome, including the tongue, with a color and material that will be compatible with the mobilehome. The siding shall be covered with an exterior material customarily used on conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development. 4. Site Plan and Elevations. The site plans and elevations of the proposed housing unit are subject to review and approval of the department of community development. Applicants are required to submit designs which are in keeping with the overall character and quality of the neighborhood and community. 5. Roof Pitch. The mobile home or manufactured housing unit shall have a roof with a pitch of not less than two (2) inches vertical rise for each twelve (12) inches of horizontal run and consisting of shingles or other material customarily used for conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development and the building official. 6. Porches and Eaves. The mobile home or manufactured housing unit may be required to have porches and eaves, or roofs with eaves when, in the opinion of the department of community development, it is necessary to make it compatible with the dwellings in the area. ATTACHMENT I Moorpark Municipal Code 17.28.020 (G) G. Second Dwelling. 1. Standards and Requirements. A second dwelling, as defined in Section 17.08.010, requires approval of an administrative permit, and compliance with all of the following standards and requirements: a. A second dwelling shall only be permitted on a residential zoned lot that is one - fourth acre (ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet) or larger in size. b. The lot on which a second dwelling is to be constructed shall contain an existing single- family dwelling, which is owner occupied at the time of application for a zoning clearance and building permit for the second dwelling. c. Prior to the approval of a zoning clearance for a second dwelling, the applicant shall be required to complete a neighborhood notification process, as established by city council resolution. d. The maximum size of the second dwelling shall be limited to the more restrictive of either thirty percent (300) of the existing single - family dwelling floor space or the following lot size limitations: i. Lots ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet to twenty -one thousand seven hundred eighty (21,780) square feet -- a second dwelling shall not exceed eight hundred (800) square feet. ii. Lots twenty -one thousand seven hundred eighty -one (21,781) square feet to forty -three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet -- a second dwelling shall not exceed nine hundred (900) square feet. iii. Lots greater than one (1) acre to five (5) acres (two hundred seventeen thousand eight hundred (217,800) square feet) - -a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. iv. Lots greater than five (5) acres -- a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand one hundred (1,100) square feet. e. No more than one (1) second dwelling is allowed on each lot. f . The second dwelling shall not be sold as a separate unit, but it may be rented. g. The lot must conform with the lot area, width and depth requirements for the underlying zone. A second dwelling shall not be allowed on a legal nonconforming lot. h. Establishment of a second dwelling shall not create or increase a nonconforming use or structure. A second dwelling shall not be allowed on a lot which contains a legal nonconforming use or structure. i. Minimum yard setbacks from the property lines for the second dwelling and associated garage or carport structure shall be the same as is required for the existing single- family dwelling based on the more restrictive of either: (i) the setback requirements of an approved residential planned development (RPD) permit (see Section 17.36.030(B)(3)); or (ii) the setback requirements of the applicable zone district (see Section 17.24.020). j. Architectural standards of the second dwelling shall conform to the existing single- family dwelling through use of the appropriate building form, height, materials and color. The roof material used for the second dwelling shall be equal to or of higher quality than that used for the existing single- family dwelling. k. The only accessory structures that may be attached to, or share a common wall with, a detached second dwelling are a garage or carport. 1. The following parking standards shall apply: i. The number of parking spaces required shall be as follows: ATTACHMENT �-' (A) Second dwelling eight hundred (800) to nine hundred (900) square feet in size -- one (1) covered or uncovered parking space is required. (B) Second dwelling larger than nine hundred (900) square feet in size -- two (2) covered or uncovered parking spaces are required. (ii) The size of each required off - street parking space shall be an unobstructed minimum of nine (9) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long. (iii)The parking space(s) provided for the second dwelling shall not be located in a required dwelling unit setback and shall be paved. (iv) The required off - street parking space(s) for a second dwelling shall be in addition to the parking required for the existing single - family dwelling, and shall be located on the same lot as the existing single- family and second dwellings. (v) Access to the parking area for a second dwelling shall be at least ten (10) feet wide and paved. m. The director of community development may approve the use of a mobilehome or a manufactured house on a fixed foundation as a second dwelling, if the design is compatible with the existing single- family dwelling and the surrounding community, and all of the mobilehome and manufactured housing standards of subsection C of this section are complied with. n. A second dwelling processing fee, as established by city council resolution, shall be paid at the time of application for a zoning clearance for a second dwelling. 2. Deferral of Decision on Application. The director of community development may defer any approval or denial decision on an application for a zoning clearance for a second dwelling to the planning commission if the proposal: a. Involves significant public controversy; or b. Is in conflict with the standards and requirements of subsection (G)(1) of this section; c. May be precedent setting; or d. Should be deferred for any other cause deemed justifiable by the director of community development. It1�Yf California Government Code 65852.3. (a) A city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, shall allow the installation of manufactured homes certified under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. Secs. 5401 et seq.) on a foundation system, pursuant to Section 18551 of the Health and Safety Code, on lots zoned for conventional single- family residential dwellings. Except with respect to architectural requirements, a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, shall only subject the manufactured home and the lot on which it is placed to the same development standards to which a conventional single- family residential dwelling on the same lot would be subject, including, but not limited to, building setback standards, side and rear yard requirements, standards for enclosures, access, and vehicle parking, aesthetic requirements, and minimum square footage requirements. Any architectural requirements imposed on the manufactured home structure itself, exclusive of any requirement for any and all additional enclosures, shall be limited to its roof overhang, roofing material, and siding material. These architectural requirements may be imposed on manufactured homes even if similar requirements are not imposed on conventional single- family residential dwellings. However, any architectural requirements for roofing and siding material shall not exceed those which would be required of conventional single- family dwellings constructed on the same lot. At the discretion of the local legislative body, the city or county may preclude installation of a manufactured home in zones specified in this section if more than 10 years have elapsed between the date of manufacture of the manufactured home and the date of the application for the issuance of a permit to install the manufactured home in the affected zone. In no case may a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, apply any development standards that will have the effect of precluding manufactured homes from being installed as permanent residences. (b) At the discretion of the local legislative body, any place, building, structure, or other object having a special character or special historical interest or value, and which is regulated by a legislative body pursuant to Section 37361, may be exempted from this section, provided the place, building, structure, or other object is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 000Oss ATTACHMENT :3 California Government Code 65852.4. A city, including a charter city, a county, or a city and county, shall not subject an application to locate or install a manufactured home certified under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 5401 et seq.) on a foundation system, pursuant to Section 18551 of the Health and Safety Code, on a lot zoned for a single- family residential dwelling, to any administrative permit, planning, or development process or requirement, which is not identical to the administrative permit, planning, or development process or requirement which would be imposed on a conventional single- family residential dwelling on the same lot. However, a city, including a charter city, county, or city and county, may require the application to comply with the city's, county's, or city and county's architectural requirements permitted by Section 65852.3 even if the architectural requirements are not required of conventional single- family residential dwellings. ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL 2001- 07 TO A DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPEAL NO. 2001 -05 TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT NO. 2001 -10 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SECOND SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 6086 GABBERT ROAD ON APPROXIMATELY 39.46 ACRES OF LAND, ON THE APPLICATION OF CINDY HOLLISTER WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 19, 2001, and continued to January 16, 2002, the City Council considered an appeal to the decision of the Planning Commission to deny an appeal to certain conditions required by the Community Development Director for approval of Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10 on the application of Cindy Hollister for placement of a second single- family residence on approximately 39.46 acres of land, located at 6086 Gabbert Road, Assessor's Parcel No. 500 -0- 330 -245 & 255; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 19, 2001, the City Council opened the Public Hearing, and after receiving public testimony, continued the hearing to January 16, 2002; and WHEREAS, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council agenda report, and testimony received on December 19, 2001 and January 16, 2002, the City Council reached its decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that the decision of the Planning Commission to deny Appeal No. 2001 -05 to the decision of the Director of Community Development to require certain conditions for placement of a second single - family residence by approval of Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10 is consistent with the purpose and intent of provisions of Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark Municipal Code, including specific development criteria contained in the Zoning Code related to second dwelling units and mobilehomes, and that the facts presented are not adequate to grant the applicant's appeal. SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: OOOOS3 \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020116 Appeal 01 -07 Hollister.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 2 C.E.Q.A. Finding Section 15303 of The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts single - family residences and second dwelling units from its provisions and appeals of decisions related to those projects. Administrative Permit Finding The proposed second single- family residence is consistent with provisions of the Zoning Code, as conditioned, that provide for the placement of a second dwelling unit in residential areas zoned for single- family development. SECTION 3. That the City Council denies Appeal No. 2001 -07 to the Planning Commission denial of Appeal No. 2001 -05 to certain conditions required by the Community Development Director for approval of Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10. SECTION 4. That The City Council has reviewed and adopted the modified conditions of approval included as Exhibit A to this resolution. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval for Administrative Permit No. 2001 -10 000064 ATTACHMENT, Resolution No. 2002 - Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 3 EXHIBIT A T L� MODIFIED �CONDITIONS �+ON�D/�I TT �ITO�NS �O7,TF MEETING � (� � � � MODIFIED D PLANNING SING GOM 'MINI MEETS�IG O 10/1 / Al FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT NO. 2001 -10 1. In accordance with Section 17.28.020.B of the Zoning Ordinance for Mobilehomes and Manufactured Housing: a) The manufactured home must be constructed on or after June 15, 1976. In eemplianee i=equir-effteRts —ez the Hi:iniei-p,� Gede, Develepffient Registr- aton Gai=Ei Deeal —Ne. LBG412 , ba- h- scrr- zTen file in the effieimalw file fe- r zcmrxirr ... r at i „ .. -geicffii:4� Ne. 2001-10. eldi ien lly p Proof of manufacture date shall b e e l e r lnT�t e -ire is n it anel/e=--�� b l e Tee .in the form of a HUD label affixed to the outside surface of the rear wall at the floor level of each transportable section. -eb) The exterior siding shall extend to the ground level, or manufactured home skirting matching the color and material of the manufactured home shall completely enclose the foundation support system and the tongue. The manufactured home siding shall be comprised of an exterior material and colors subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. The pain4� ee1-ers shewn - -en the -- eeler bearel r 2001, ,a inelileled --ate a part of thims apprey-,cl, shall be walls. The exterior (the "wood -tone siding" appearance) of the manufactured home shall be maintained free of chips, excessive fading, or peeling as determined by the Director of Community Development, for as long as the manufactured home is located on this property. 000065 Resolution No. 2002- Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 4 'dc) The project shall conform to the - a revised site plan and elevations, subject to approval of the Director of Community Development through a Zoning Clearance and shall be in compliance with the conditions of approval of Administrative d T,,l . 1 ca 200 pt reviseel the ��_"__ _ _ __ ___ _ _1' _._ , �� -��-e^ 1 The , f- et,, red h....,e shall have - a—reef with lea than twe twelve (12+ ( �rch e vertic al rise inehes heL=izentarrdn all ^ l —ef and — -- eensist of asphalt teh tl: . �e'�— the 'J'L _hi -- 'th 'AZ— L1 �ev� e•e e� — e2 Tg �Tg� beta =f T y r-siel .flee and — eE r weight, pre,aidet life. d) The proposal shall comply with all requirements of Section 17.28.020(C) relating to Mobilehomes and Manufactured Housina. 2. In accordance with Section 17.28.020.G of the Zoning Ordinance for a Second Dwelling: a)The manufactured home /second dwelling shall be placed on the same lot as the existing single- family residence (identified as APNs 500 -0- 330 -245 and 500 -0- 330 -255). If this property is subsequently divided into two separate parcels, the manufactured home /second dwelling shall be removed from the site, or brought into conformance with the Zoning Ordinance requirements in effect at the time for a primary single- family residence, prior to recordation of the final map. The ^ ,n4} i=eq,drL=ee1 in eendiceie — this— i � Resolution No. 2002 - Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 5 O - •c a -- s - a s -- - - - - ' -- eb) The maximum size of the second dwelling shall not exceed 490 square feet (thirty percent (300) of the floor space of the existing single- family primary residence)., er 1,100 (ene thews ca ene h., . C aa � e—feet, FE�C ze ram$ less. TnL=re co the isslianee of a Zone —Gl nee — and - Building Permit f t ��r�l rt- -e-r�z c :, J L 1 - J- .-..] the rri Try= .�] ; t / f , , f -, e t , , r ...-1 r�s -i d ~� �e-ge . �e� -a-dso dwelling h ,-..., e shall b p r6vi El l.d : the Dpa t,, .,t. Teldi�-, --- l 1. the appileant shall i=e idest an existing prifftai=y -single -f ffiily residenee, stateffient fL=e er— arehh�t .,e t; f. .,g the eF the primary 'r- r�rm--rry - 1_:-nit, pi =ieTTe the issuanee ef a Zene Z'eara1TCC and m , r rldzz g— Permit. Pe Z0n-e— Gl-e- arranE e D , l-el 1ng Per� shall be issaed fer he—ins -,l-r atien -ef the _---,-,.,1 dwel l= r J it unless it is elefftenstrated anel ' v= cri-frcc that the s-ccen-cr dwelling unit i n eenf2rffianee —moo with this evrrcrr�len of required by this cvi xc�rti-6 "' be pat'el — Ei1=�e_ - =1' t-e Departffient o f Bidileling and Safety a n el are net eens i d ec -red -a as 000067 Resolution No. 2002 - Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 6 qCT GT (i) -G@ver2E ��r dzeev, - ��- e-ff_ i -e, et parking spuee shall be L2cga±L =e _Fe the eenei e1welling idn + The this paicking spaee shall be an id n e b s t r,, t- e ,a FRinimiafft ez nri (9) feet wid e by twenty (20) feet deep. Access to }1 e ark±- - r_ cTi�-'i= -n—r-i i � r �r- ea -fer the second dwelling shall be at least ten (10) feet wide and shall be pave d -w­Ah -as- phi- a-1 -t-i -e een rote twe -(2) inehes . . .. -h e t-h i=e k ever a-€e ur— nc h t with an all weather surface, which meets the Ventura County Fire Protection District standards . As an alternative to- he - -pa i ng providing an all weather surface e- f- access to the second unit, .................. ........................ ............__...................................._._..........._.._................._................................_....................................... ............................... consideration will be given to the - paving- providing an all weather surface of -t access road to the primary dwelling unit to serve as access to both structures. Reg dared parking fer t-he -weer idnim� ffi y i=efftr-,-„- -as as er Fftay be icel-ee Any and all ases and struc�L=es en-- the -p r e p e barn,— that -rte , -ewe p tt t have been existing - picifflary - residential unit and net to inspeetlen fer the l , n —final — seeend trre e._,e J up -it. t6 :n L=uLZ cr iae _ 1elcTrc rrrcc en x- -site p r.. , te t'IY'e r;3-C- -tuL�-e-S -. r�ev' rz __,,m�....�crrT -_ __ prier Glearanee fer thrseeend- unit. is d) The proposal shall comply with all requirements of Section 17.28.020(G) relatinq to Second Dwellinqs. 3. The existing dumpsters used for horse maintenance and trash as identified on the attached site plan shall be visually screened from view from the public right -of -way behind the r-e��, e through the addition of landscape screening er ..ie -a -dit e - vfelid fleneine ....-...in lend -gin wit aid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the second unit. 4. The existing second dwelling unit /travel trailer that is currently located on the property without a permit shall be r Resolution No. 2002 - Administrative Permit 2001 -10 (Cindy Hollister) Page 7 removed from the site by April 30, 2002. rcx%evl T the cscrrt mc h at s' az- a r-crov'rl — elecs — net take p= ut within m he :' ±* rre— seeifieel abev ,c-- this depesit will be ,t; l ed r e l e e a t e el te - b`e-ninel — the barn e r- te - nether l e pie n ewe / as eleteL=ffiineel lay y Level•e'p Fften. that id h that yehiele shall net - VTTIbT�efft the street. -This required pesting ef sidLaety anel removal releeatien of the trailer shall occur prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance and Building Permit for te— pr-epesed— the approved second dwelling unit. 5. All permit and fee requirements must be met, including the requirement for a Zone Clearance and Building Permit and the payment of all applicable development fees for a new sidenee, second dwelling unit. 6. The_8outstanding processing fee-& of $1320.00 for Administrative Permit 2001 -10 shall be paid prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance and Building Permit for the second dwelling unit. Tire 7. The property shall be maintained, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.48.020 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance and Building Permit, the old tires and bathtub located westerly of the proposed second dwelling /manufactured home shall be removed or relocated to within the existing barn corral area on the property. 0060 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council ITEM �• F• _ E { AC-s : � � pabl ►c, E �. �c Ad c�tr✓ter� �c N1+ of I -a3 CJIY�'C� r�ittFF �[� PfP We exi En�cc rat ror- zn FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community Development '-D JT- Prepared by: Paul Porter, Principal Planne� i DATE: January 11, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 for a 2,868 Square Foot Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with Drive - through Service and a 17,196 Square Foot Two -story Retail /Office Building on Property Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue One Property West of the Southwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Leta Yancy Road, North of the Arroyo Simi, on the Application of Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty (Assessors Parcel No. 506 -0 -05 -050) SUMMARY Commercial Planned Development (CPD) No. 2000 -02 is a request for a 2,868 square foot Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with drive - through service and a 17,196 square foot two -story retail /office building located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Leta Yancy Road (see project exhibits, Attachments 1 and 2). On August 27, 2001 the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of this application to the City Council (see Attachments 3 and 4 for Planning Commission staff reports and Resolution). A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (including Mitigation Monitoring Program) have been prepared for the proposed project (see Attachment 5). Conditions of approval have been drafted (see Attachment 6) to include items intended to address Planning Commission and staff concerns related to access, architectural design, signage, and phasing of construction. 000070 S: \Community Development\Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc- 020116SR CPD 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Final.doc Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 2 BACKGROUND This item was heard by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2001, July 9, 2001 and August 27, 2001. The Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council for conditional approval addressed their concern related to the lack of an access opportunity for traffic approaching this commercial site from all directions. Issues raised by the Planning Commission included concern with a second curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue, or joint access to /from Los Angeles Avenue from the adjoining gas station, potentially resulting in conflicting traffic movements. As a result, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the then proposed joint curb cut at Los Angeles Avenue between the Mobil Oil Facility and the subject property be eliminated. The applicant has since revised the plot plan eliminating the joint access. The Planning Commission also indicated that a preferred second access to the Jack -in the -Box site should be taken from Leta Yancy Road through the southerly portion of the gas station, which if such access were not achievable, the Planning Commission recommended that an additional traffic study be required with various options studied, including obtaining access to the site via a U -turn at Shasta Avenue and /or restricting access to Los Angeles Avenue to the westerly curb -cut. The Planning Commission recommendations also included architectural design recommendations for the office building and providing for signage of the units on the first floor level (incorporated into the draft conditions of approval in Attachment 6). DISCUSSION Site Location The subject property located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue is one lot west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Leta Yancy Road, and is a rectangular shaped parcel, with overall dimensions of approximately 340 feet (deep) by 215 feet (wide). Site topography consists of relatively level terrain, dipping downward slightly to the east and south. To the east of the site is the existing Mobil carwash /gas station. A single - family residential project (Pacific Communities) has been approved for the property contiguous to the south and west. 0OQ®7i Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 3 Project Description Commercial Planned Development No. 2000 -02 is a request to construct a 2,868 square foot Jack -in- the -Box restaurant with drive - through service and the proposed 17,196 square foot two story retail /office building. No outside seating is proposed for the restaurant. The proposed Jack -in- the -Box restaurant has overall dimensions of approximately 80 feet by 35 feet while the dimensions of the retail /office building are approximately 60 feet by 150 feet. The architectural style of this project is a French Provincial design with detailed features, including wood shutters, reveals, canvas awnings, clay tile roofing, and wrought iron accents with various color combinations to vary the appearance. The only access to the site will occur from a proposed thirty - six ( 36 ) foot wide curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue near the west property line. The drive aisle leading from this curb -cut turns easterly and southerly through the parking lot between the proposed Jack -in- the -Box restaurant and the retail /office building to a parking area in the rear portion of the site. Access to the drive - through is provided by a one -way drive isle beginning at the southeast corner of the site and continuing northerly along the easterly property line. Drive - through traffic exiting the site is directed northerly and westerly via the one -way drive isle to the main entry isle. Stacking within the drive - through aisle will accommodate approximately eleven (11) automobiles without interfering with parking lot circulation. A menu board and speaker is located approximately 95 feet from future single family homes abutting the south property line. Relocation of the speaker board further to the north (away from the homes to be located to the south of the site) may be necessary to avoid nuisance noise impacts. The standard condition of approval allowing the Director of Community Development to require a noise study prior to initial and subsequent occupancy approvals has been revised to include the requirement for a noise study prior to Zone Clearance for the Building Permit to determine proper placement of the speaker board. Parking (including 2 handicapped parking spaces for each building) is located between and to the rear (south side of parcel) of each of the two buildings. A trash enclosure is located adjacent to the south side of each building. Staff has included conditions requiring that the trash enclosures be Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 4 provided with pedestrian access, covered, screened and satisfy NPDES requirements. Public entrances to the Jack -in- the -Box restaurant are proposed to be located on the west and north sides of the building. Public entry to the downstairs lease space of office /retail building will be from east side of the building, while access to the second story will be provided by stairways at both the north and south sides of the building as well as by an elevator located on the south side of the building adjacent to the proposed loading area. A condition of approval has been added to require enclosure of the south - facing stairway (the north - facing stairway is already enclosed within the building). Decorative balcony treatments are proposed which will be non- functional, but will serve to enhance the French Provincial architectural theme. Architectural features and coloration of the buildings have been modified since the initial Planning Commission hearing held on June 11, 2001 to include several tower /roof elements with hip roof design on the west elevation. Additionally, a shed roof element has been incorporated between the lower elements replacing the parapet. The revised architecture incorporates additional detail and a less imposing fagade as it slopes away from the adjoining residential development. The roof tile is a dark brown, flat, concrete tile and dark green, round canvas awnings are provided. The color palette includes a dark brown color base (Dunn Edwards Nutmeg TI -DE -1037) around the perimeter of the buildings to a height of approximately three (3') feet. The overall building color will be a light, yellow brown (Dunn Edwards Little Toot DE 1029) with the towers and wall elements beginning at the second story proposed with a color hue between the base and the walls (Dunn Edwards Buff Pill DE 1028). The Jack -in- the -Box uses this color only on the tower elements. An additional accent trim color has been added to the fascia, which is a light chocolate color. Decorative paving is included on the entrance drive parallel to Los Angeles Avenue which should also be included in front of the buildings and as a crossing between buildings for pedestrian movements. Privacy within the adjacent future single family residential project was a concern of the Planning Commission. A draft condition of approval was added to require the bottom sill height of the second story offices in the westerly side of the retail /office building to be a minimum of six (6) feet above the Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 5 finish floor level. Other architectural and design concerns of the Planning Commission have been incorporated into the draft conditions of approval. As previously addressed in this report, staff has added a condition of approval to require enclosure of the south - facing stairway, to further ensure residential use privacy. Staff has remaining concerns regarding the interface between the proposed commercial development and adjacent residential area. The site plan incorporates only the minimal planter width requirement along the south and west property lines. Based on the proposed 2 -foot overhang of the parking along the south property line, that planting area has effectively been reduced to 3.5 feet with the wall footing encroaching further into that narrow planting area. Only the minimum Zoning Code requirement of 10 percent of parking area and site landscaping has been provided for this project. Conditioning the project to provide wider landscaped planting areas along the south and west property boundaries would not address what affect the wider planter areas would have on the site plan (for example, parking spaces, drive aisle width, and /or building relocation and sizing would be affected). This is an outstanding issue that has not been addressed in the proposed draft conditions of approval. Circulation The Planning Commission had significant comment and concern relating to on -site circulation and site access for the proposed uses; both of which are likely to generate substantial vehicle trips. The project originally proposed a connection between the subject site and the Mobil Station /Mini Mart to the east for westbound only access through a shared driveway. This access has since been eliminated from the site plan as this proposed access would create the potential for conflicting traffic movements. Absent this connecting driveway, the only access to the proposed project is through the westerly curb cut proposed on Los Angeles Avenue. The Mobil Station Commercial Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit (CPD No. 97 -01 and CUP 97 -02) were conditioned to provide for cross traffic flow and sharing of curb cuts, but details of this proposed circulation concept were not specified in the condition. The owner of the Mobil Station has been contacted on several occasions concerning the provision of access and circulation between that site and Jack -in- the -Box across the southerly portion of the Mobil station site. The Mobil station owner has thus far declined this 000074 Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 6 point of access. During the Planning Commission hearing process, testimony was received regarding a recorded agreement relating to access from Leta Yancy Road to the proposed Jack -in- the -Box site. The agreement was intended to address access from Leta Yancy Road to the prior parcel configuration, with a common driveway straddling the southerly property line of the gas station parcel. The agreement also provides for reconfiguration of the access, including a shared curb -cut from Los Angeles Avenue, which was determined by the City Engineer to create a potential for traffic circulation conflicts. Although the agreement includes language giving the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development discretion concerning relocation of the driveways /curb -cuts, the City Attorney has determined that the relocation is voluntary on the part of the owners, and that the City, not being a signatory to the agreement, has no obligation to pursue curb -cut relocation. The City Engineer has determined that a left turn from westbound Los Angeles Avenue directly into the site is highly undesirable, because the left - turning traffic has no turn pocket or lane to decelerate in prior to turning left, and there is insufficient room to accommodate re- striping to provide a safe turn pocket. The City Engineer has recommended that the solid double lines and island chevrons should be extended well past the westerly property line of the proposed project to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue. Persons wanting to enter the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue could potentially continue westerly to the future signal at Shasta Avenue, execute a U -turn, and return to the site as eastbound traffic. Although the travel to Shasta Avenue and the U -turn movement will consume a portion of the traffic capacity of Los Angeles Avenue, the U -turn would be a protected movement after Shasta signal construction and may not impact traffic safety any more than the increment in traffic congestion that it will cause. The Planning Commission recommended that the joint curb cut at Los Angeles Avenue between the Mobil Station and the subject property be eliminated and that the first priority for access to this project be taken from Leta Yancy Road through the Mobil Station near the southerly property line. The Planning Commission further recommended that if secondary access through the Mobil Station near the southerly property line is not achievable, an additional traffic study be required to study the impacts to Los Angeles Avenue traffic from U -turns at Shasta 000075 Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 7 Avenue. Access to the subject property from Los Angeles Avenue under the U -turn option would be limited to one driveway at the westerly property line. To date, no traffic analysis addressing these issues has been submitted by the applicant. Construction of the Shasta Avenue signal is currently dependent upon completion of the Pacific Communities project. In addition, Los Angeles Avenue has not yet been widened along the Pacific Communities project frontage along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, furthering the potential impact from U -turn traffic until such traffic improvements are completed. As the project is currently proposed with only one westerly driveway, no left turns allowed from the center median, no signal yet installed at Shasta Avenue, and incomplete widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, access to this site will be extremely limited, especially for the proposed restaurant and retail uses, which typically depend upon high traffic counts. This development site, because of the limited access, does not currently serve well as a location for a fast - food restaurant. Until construction of the signal at Shasta Avenue and completion of the widening of Los Angeles Avenue along the south side between Shasta Avenue and the project site, access to the site remains a significant concern. The applicant's failure to complete the traffic study requested by the Planning Commission does not allow for an accurate determination of impact. In addition, the applicant's fair - share contribution for the cost of improvements to the Los Angeles Avenue /Shasta Avenue intersection cannot be accurately determined. Desian and Phased Construction The architecture of the fast food restaurant to some extent compliments the architectural style of the retail /office building. The design of the retail /office building contains several elements reflective of a French Provincial architectural style, which when combined with modifications to the architectural elements of the restaurant, complements the architectural styles of neighboring commercial developments along Los Angeles Avenue. There is a concern that if the restaurant is built without the office /retail building, the desired architectural effect for the site may not be what decision - makers envision for the community. Phased construction of the project may result in a less than desirable end product, because elements of the site design, such as circulation, 000076 Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 8 landscaping and architectural cohesiveness may be compromised. In order to ensure the development of an integrated project, construction of both buildings is recommended to take place at the same time. This would ensure long -term continuity of the architectural design, integration of the site plan, and provide for a cohesive development. If the City Council determines to approve the proposed project, a condition of approval has been drafted to require concurrent construction of both buildings or initial construction of the retail /office building in advance of the fast -food restaurant (see Attachment 6). General Plan Consiste The General Plan land use designation is C -2 (General Commercial), which is consistent with the existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development) zoning on the property. The proposed fast -food restaurant including drive - through and office /retail building are considered consistent with the exiting General Plan land use designation. Consistency with General Plan policies remains a concern. Incorporation of the Planning Commission's design recommendations into the conditions of approval as well as requiring a noise study to determine appropriate placement of the Jack in the Box speaker board, ensures better compliance with Land Use Element Policy 8.2, generally requiring that design features be incorporated so as to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent uses. However, staff still has remaining concerns that the minimal amount of landscaping provided along the south and west property boundaries does not provide an adequate buffer between the commercial and residential land uses. The proposed project can be conditioned to be consistent with Policy 2.2 of the General Plan Circulation Element, which states that project phasing shall be coordinated with the construction of on -site and off -site circulation improvements to maintain the performance standards objectives specified in Policy 2.1 and to ensure that improvements are in place when needed. The proposed project is not currently consistent with Policy 2.6, which states that secondary access should be required for projects located in the middle of a block adjacent to a limited - access arterial. For the reasons discussed previously, compliance with Policy 2.6 is probably not feasible due to already approved 000077 Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 9 projects to the east (Mobil Station), south and west (Pacific Communities) . The City Council could take action to deny the application without prejudice, due to General Plan consistency concerns and related to inadequate access, potential circulation impacts, failure to complete the Planning Commission requested traffic study, and insufficient landscaping to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent residential land uses. Staff's opinion is that the project is premature based on the current circulation system. Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation for conditional approval, staff has prepared a draft resolution for approval that includes additional draft conditions as addressed in this report. Increasing the landscaping areas on the southern and westerly boundaries is not addressed in the draft conditions of approval, because the result would be reconfiguration of the site plan. If the Council determines that the application should be denied, staff should be directed to bring back a resolution for denial without prejudice. This would be a preferred action versus continuance off calendar, due to Permit Streamlining Act time limits for action on the application. The Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed project have been revised to require that the solid double lines and island chevrons be extended past the westerly property line of the proposed project to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue, and to require completion of the Shasta Avenue signal construction and widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue and the project site prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for grading and building permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the requested entitlements prior to making a decision on the project. Honorable City Council January 16, 2002 Meeting Page 10 3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution for denial of the project without prejudice for the reasons discussed in staff report. Attachments: 1. General Plan and Zoning Maps 2. Project Exhibits 3. Planning Commission Staff Reports of June 11, 2001, July 9, 2001 and August 27, 2001 4. Planning Commission Resolution 5. Mitigated Negative Declaration, Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program 6. City Council Draft Resolution including Conditions of Approval 10000 ,71 m H T -V I A 41 1 a F7E CR VERSY NAT GRADE ;XISTING COMMgRCIAL (GAS STATION t CARWASN) ADJACENT ��,�© .JY :..Jai:': _.:._ ._.•..........- _�..._.: I E'31t 3i ni� 171'L �Y1Ytr: t cam 1_ .A 'Vf ip iri ME All No n ,. ma (D � ilt@tltNf� r m I Kim r SCALE: 1- 16' -O- m � — (D PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY I I ESN a .rr I nrr .J1t ! II •r nr r. w.. wn Ir Aa1�R: -Mtr •Yt t� Loo ��■�n�� ©lier,� I�ls_ l�mNiea I LINE WALL w_rtAY • wr. ■ /mom o —J J 1 ISM• I BY OTHERS rert..r wa• rRt w.°.'or..dw■w•Y�°O .cr■ I I n.r•r r.rt Itllp T /tlt �tT P 11'/Ylf — er lr.i a.r ■ IrI r.I.wP. .,. R`�rz O e-6 .1 ■ IM V�r • V., • II.! /tlt Itr. rar..to n. DAN. r. / rwt rlmrr. rY t lIR/M/It ■— Q b TIC — � r row rwrr /m «.r...... ,unwr r �.I.ii M.1•r.er ,r.■ t r. trw � rr rvrr . I.sm I H.r•r al Ir�t ..1 `♦ F7E CR VERSY NAT GRADE ;XISTING COMMgRCIAL (GAS STATION t CARWASN) ADJACENT ��,�© .JY :..Jai:': _.:._ ._.•..........- _�..._.: I E'31t 3i ni� 171'L �Y1Ytr: t cam 1_ .A 'Vf ip iri ME All No n ,. ma (D ml� TF PI AN FUTURE RESIDENTIAL (ADJACENT) m WE m SCALE: 1- 16' -O- m � — 17 N I �_ PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY I I ESN a .rr I nrr .J1t ! II •r nr r. w.. wn E• CYU I I Loo I 13 CONT I LINE WALL w_rtAY • wr. ■ /mom o —J J 1 ml� TF PI AN FUTURE RESIDENTIAL (ADJACENT) 1 SCALE: 1- 16' -O- — — 17 N I �_ PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY I I ESN a .rr I nrr .J1t ! II •r nr r. w.. wn E• CYU I I ADJACENT PROP 13 CONT I LINE WALL w_rtAY • wr. ■ /mom o 1 ill o ISM• I ml� : �.:� ■ /.m GROSS FLOOR AREA p NOW I 1 10011 I «rmRrmw..�.. «�■ va .1. — tr w n SPACER LAP 16• rrl��rw.Y PROP LINE RETAINING WALL 1i MIME 1_ BUILDING DATA: ■nw. tw•PI Irl•wr tw rI1. Iv:i v cwa+tlnutsn � �n rtos tuat«o roan tr -rr .0 uarert rral r tsw -r wrr M..,Y 1•eanW l.. W Arr4f. •r.• z z W U O J z Z W O vi W K W cc tYlw. taYl n•t•dr w Vt RIa ■wwc(EeR noes man. twt v e0o «'"'liCt�i " k w«w. wan ■' -r .•. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAKa 1 Or 1141 CENTM LOI tw AOArstw.i M -1, MECaAan DECEMBER IA 129D. AS WSA.[MI OR w -nlnJ OF dno,L N@OA WINE A PORTION d LOI .. MACI L. MMOro SM, w K Oh Yw MA Or VOWAIK COY Or RM $YAK Cr CNPOaA AS SEA MAP NCMb N NOW 1 PACE S OF MAPS, N M OFFMI OF K auOl MECONO OF SAO OPIIn. GENERAL CONDITIONS uR.a •wn.clat aal rrt M•1 «L w ro w t•l •rer /e.xMM....e1tA asw• Bus lrc r .YUrts a �:i�YMIY 1rt. 11a owre o.0 A e M r..aaun Ir j— Ma. 1a�•w, ell. dIM r Bra SITE PLAN NOTES Q- -sx— .amour.. Or wnr d v na Boar r rvr a. Or nr.•..Ir.K. r.l o men r w.c w .rrsa �twrtYa"' 4 Mr a� �r-J w P Ori #1 fw r w8r al O. +rrw rltwwnaysar a. OrWr W.«..Y M wvut ..n t t IIY iia .ro au. Qi Qr mwr v.• �,er.• QIn lr"ARM Or —am as ■ta wM t, Or�I m aa1 wrr In na wn..r r br o. .ww w '•.c w ..s .ew .•ra. / 4.N[ tit MfY 4i ■l� w.r...! ftlw .Dial e.rrr + 6rttY. w M .at Oral oA r wren r [•. lla. �. .Y. Ielrl retf tr. M. r ■ut lVa. Oww[urel.rtn. .ra. QP roof ar «w- r 1...vda ./a. Qe Mix— tan twr, r.rr ..l ro m rr..L Qtn.aa wrr . [ .w.rw A •n /rr.a �n Iwo. a.e. ■ ww.a R [ r.s Otrot wYal Irlr.rer w .r Ov.r m.a•arc ' Oi ....n•w, r two o. O.wo rw, v .ra wr. Or.°a°Vi. wxviewrv.0 wa'� •m. w [ Or.A ra..R r ■ra �/a. Owren .r. n t.. •w .rua v .ra um. Orl•tl N 11 retl rc r wa wmat On w tr ..At n w. -.r urt. v rtra .,a. QI..w.rY Ol IwNn r Oa•r. f er of Qr w. l.r .ams wrwo rr L « wal rod QaY.mrrlrw.0 wwasvR� 10 /OOV au�1 R Ow i r. �4iY ms TF PI AN FUTURE RESIDENTIAL (ADJACENT) 1 SCALE: 1- 16' -O- PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROJECT SUMMARY I I w rYr.•.•twe a M rna r Y r,.r a .rr I nrr .J1t ! II •r nr r. w.. wn E• CYU I I ADJACENT PROP 13 CONT I LINE WALL w_rtAY • wr. ■ /mom rr.•r°t u.l t 1 ISM• I BY OTHERS rert..r wa• rRt w.°.'or..dw■w•Y�°O .cr■ I I n.r•r r.rt Itllp T /tlt �tT P 11'/Ylf — er lr.i a.r ■ IrI r.I.wP. .,. I I ■ IM V�r • V., • II.! /tlt Itr. rar..to n. DAN. r. / rwt rlmrr. rY t lIR/M/It ■— Q b TIC — � r row rwrr /m «.r...... ,unwr r �.I.ii M.1•r.er ,r.■ t r. trw � rr rvrr . I.sm : �.:� ■ /.m GROSS FLOOR AREA p NOW I 1 10011 I «rmRrmw..�.. «�■ va .1. — tr w n SPACER LAP 16• rrl��rw.Y PROP LINE RETAINING WALL 1i MIME 1_ BUILDING DATA: ■nw. tw•PI Irl•wr tw rI1. Iv:i v cwa+tlnutsn � �n rtos tuat«o roan tr -rr .0 uarert rral r tsw -r wrr M..,Y 1•eanW l.. W Arr4f. •r.• z z W U O J z Z W O vi W K W cc tYlw. taYl n•t•dr w Vt RIa ■wwc(EeR noes man. twt v e0o «'"'liCt�i " k w«w. wan ■' -r .•. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAKa 1 Or 1141 CENTM LOI tw AOArstw.i M -1, MECaAan DECEMBER IA 129D. AS WSA.[MI OR w -nlnJ OF dno,L N@OA WINE A PORTION d LOI .. MACI L. MMOro SM, w K Oh Yw MA Or VOWAIK COY Or RM $YAK Cr CNPOaA AS SEA MAP NCMb N NOW 1 PACE S OF MAPS, N M OFFMI OF K auOl MECONO OF SAO OPIIn. GENERAL CONDITIONS uR.a •wn.clat aal rrt M•1 «L w ro w t•l •rer /e.xMM....e1tA asw• Bus lrc r .YUrts a �:i�YMIY 1rt. 11a owre o.0 A e M r..aaun Ir j— Ma. 1a�•w, ell. dIM r Bra SITE PLAN NOTES Q- -sx— .amour.. Or wnr d v na Boar r rvr a. Or nr.•..Ir.K. r.l o men r w.c w .rrsa �twrtYa"' 4 Mr a� �r-J w P Ori #1 fw r w8r al O. +rrw rltwwnaysar a. OrWr W.«..Y M wvut ..n t t IIY iia .ro au. Qi Qr mwr v.• �,er.• QIn lr"ARM Or —am as ■ta wM t, Or�I m aa1 wrr In na wn..r r br o. .ww w '•.c w ..s .ew .•ra. / 4.N[ tit MfY 4i ■l� w.r...! ftlw .Dial e.rrr + 6rttY. w M .at Oral oA r wren r [•. lla. �. .Y. Ielrl retf tr. M. r ■ut lVa. Oww[urel.rtn. .ra. QP roof ar «w- r 1...vda ./a. Qe Mix— tan twr, r.rr ..l ro m rr..L Qtn.aa wrr . [ .w.rw A •n /rr.a �n Iwo. a.e. ■ ww.a R [ r.s Otrot wYal Irlr.rer w .r Ov.r m.a•arc ' Oi ....n•w, r two o. O.wo rw, v .ra wr. Or.°a°Vi. wxviewrv.0 wa'� •m. w [ Or.A ra..R r ■ra �/a. Owren .r. n t.. •w .rua v .ra um. Orl•tl N 11 retl rc r wa wmat On w tr ..At n w. -.r urt. v rtra .,a. QI..w.rY Ol IwNn r Oa•r. f er of Qr w. l.r .ams wrwo rr L « wal rod QaY.mrrlrw.0 wwasvR� 10 /OOV au�1 R Ow i r. �4iY ms GEPEW ItORSt 1� jar s• nm u vm 8 a a a 9�r n - - --- — fo� .....K..� a ........ G • Te o - LLI ZI �� --... r•.�.-..- .-. r- .SM %IM f /Sli.i >® w _ s ;J,� �......r....w.._.� bi Z Ln FUTURE COMMERCIAL BLDG �s — '�" - -.— — •� —• Z 12 �6 - — — — — — — — PLAN NOTES _. la]l 1 it a s-..t amOf. ar -0 1A RRMB 0 _ J' 1a' a .vu� rran rp. ,a. � n .n.n m.,a•. u✓ YY11�- a„- R • w. BENCH MARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION BASIS OF BEARING LEGEND • tw n.r... pr•[., !.. t.ea. Rvw y . Ru o,ne rat IaaL 101 1W1I MRIM L01 LK AMUSIOE.I IS -1. tl.N. e•u YR. - OF a p...a n, Iwc CONCEPTUAL Kn •, ...w...n m... s .r.n. ,r Mt ,s _nn - ww, a.. —a.— ....a.� naw .K. I[l W W W WRD 17. II A a1 SIS-I F L f ,q. N- 771777 Yw a iaMM p „t uurp yt s la wsu. •4wR. W ,[.t a.n s .•...n w. ,.. m..aR na • rp .,w-.. a a " a" or>, o rt a . C ME 6 lot [, , ST T IMa111 (-a 1 Oa..K trw Eu.o bW M.ME OI'Ia badVMl, Ca.Aa`a.M�S /aRa l,[wiYl. KaiJ .I b -.1 /�eINV '/�I aEI Cart.Rti AS PER YIP RCOgn . W= S. Y•a S a umm GENERAL CONDITIONS VR/4lEI�Vf LM SI IK alto a H COMir IaCON" a Iw COItI.. YK.,L cawrcma ...t . r. tw- IR-TL a S D 5 t wa.a - 1. •a.t p 1a A I wa a. w w �1 f., w COUCFPTl1A1 1 ANDSCAPF PI AN XAaI: 1' . 20' -0' Mwf Ort•r e.Y• rY rmrr u. • tK.owa aXn a.nrx \Y -OWN result. — • AA RP YO ([Arr.ARrrrr.a Iq p I • e.R R. r r R !.. aY a . Rw a we f YJrI .[.No.. wl Rr MIR s Ya.% —I—" wue\a 7wI q Ir WO MI q IA tY. aY.w r.Ya �.aNr Ja.\r, wIY. • tKq.tw r.IX.R ..x so. ORt. ra.aC a.a•I r..r Rerr A trrr4rl Olt. I•' a.rRM1• .ar rx..w4 I lNA • —ft O',M err aMr atop arYL IAr■itt w COO, p mrrr0 eft• N 41 a4 RYrtq IN l.W rl os.rr■ e\. A' rr...a w.lrta a ua .•..+. Oa[1RA W.AR, 0-000 • tK.O•R Mn u Yt/ar.et. OOR OI.rII -qe rwa mr ff twlr[■ elm K r1LL OOI RMws •rA• n■ —� n le O .A—O rt•KN. IY.a • • r IXI\ fR/.Yr/MNL .rro. r.w -tY1 rLKL [.e+r AO Arw• nA.W.�q�Ml \ • r I— .al RYn4 A Rrrela■r r•M•'.•t1f.Y Iwr.1', OwR RIgIa.Nr tw • • I. ~q OIL 0"=km: wn rrta • M rqy I•Yr .rO V r q.nra oar t.oaxw R M r.[• V Y .Y[.•. a.Kf M 40MR r drf0. J.r Na A.[KIOatIYA ••..aA. N..l .•a.w • twrRt4 1!X74 1rINAM1. Nw lL- P R.IN.A NL I• I1IYY11[t101 — "no, N t.a rK ® .wofu IP sw..wer• tKrRq WO. fwr.Yx \M e 1-1 e.a .arr A Cpr.rwl •IL If INL Alrr rWR4 rr l.Ol .■rt: r[w.r M(• .ON 1.; .It .II .1 worn. en '.0 RYwO' M[ Y.Nr .LpIl.al M r . a RYAN M NIIA.err erwx over M fII 01 Mx RYn A.. OfaK4t g9 n M OR MO A.twa. q[Ir Y. IJNP.II rWR w[aga RYn •Ir[t rl R rfI.LLD. Yes RYn r[ Yrt• la. r •rtYw rw. O\ n M .rtaaf .all!. INA[ YM 10. w AMrrq rrtI •r M .ru•rt uKL YmIY[OA 11[Ye r aYtq .a.N ILWI 000aR r•K.. !1 l.O. t IRO . .flt fVI.R, rf14. um MO IJ.r - a .eKY.I M. IRMO OR A r�Rt NIA M•K t[ rr Rp[0 .. M aql. al �./r[M N R Y• M • al. M vR. rare .:eRre Y e [[qr Irr lre\e n. M trawo •r• Or n[ w.•a. a...a •rwa t.K. • fr •w. a u uYl • r rr., nNf M rr.n aK..w v M I4.R• as Yte A R J.'..r, n•.J.• w Ilrw onY m:a.•rN. .M•uOrrlla R(tarl.Jr.w.r0. .[.w I.sOtO rAlf 117ULMeUp[•..Orq C••rr.? AI .rr i�wl ri MGM NN�r. p. wrY ea:,w. A (M / •} r�sie'tixw�.•a�r a:.u�.a..°e ai.�.•:r nsw \`// T rW. t.1ax rr .wrY r•pr, p. w..Y m.rw. I utr RYIM IMm..AI N IJf�w'w•"f' wit�it�r �r: ny ri `� n:.•°1•.rO1 m..•ur� . [.o- R.r..II Qww. •.mr...'. le.•A Rr• rr Rra.ex q..r., rbr Or.1. ra:M. rJ.r J.r A r rrr. a.if4 v .rr. raver, n. •.... a•r..�•, . 1/d rtl rU.l (QA r•YA Von M Urtl■ .1 M N • I•.O. Cw•.r..R I Carr. N rirr rYrp HrI .rp YYrr ror[r.n raver 1.1 . rA ly ea .. •r Yraln. .a Rwn Y( Yrm ar Y rf><..[ r•r. � n M .� roues. .oR Yi0 1a. W .MrYe r4 .I M .ai..[ NKL r 00 elA.e M Y.rd..Q nl■r .M9t. m rKY sa.NO�a RY1 e..a R .r um r ...r.r Y err � .r M 1rt w A RYw•. .l RYn MILL ..K .r YYr J V.KI •r M r.w M! .w RYw• YNtl•A .arn e.rt .n R .•/w•q MlwteO f.w. IR . O.OR nNLn .a. RIArO YO.00e:01 A •a/w ..N■A RY! �.tlK • .01 [falQa �41.11.A Ml YRe ae. Y .eoou T rrw OR n M Aotf n. fQ Yrr ae. W rrrlltM rrq •r M rpww u.\. a.oa.rre.e .rsN Jr.QI/ n ...r..I w waf :we.0 f M. •aw. r .rrw W. a.rr a n. s .rNS !rave m� e•K .\lf fu! �nrr wK -Ma . nar.R o.K er am .m•a .rc aIN a rx sew arm r\[ Wo•. a. Rn. pl0 Nn • IO I IrYI •r. • I.J AJ.ar rJarwf ..O of •par 1r.A . of I f•r a n. • 1N . w . ru•q o^ us.na •w az iww uwowiawwi .:rw � • wn man (ir s n.s.ail Rc :14 1 fs rr.r •ru I.I 71,Z ;I PU r,.K. Iry :YfL.YR G G G G G 11 1 li'll -111 ei di s A f r® rw .! • fl�D Y ..L f.! LAN;SCAPN CONCEPT PLAN t Li t wsoRl orr.mK.a rraw uR.., rc Wel n• -a.r �� ; %i; .px.w. rwwn eY m .•Ywow. r I.ra. uAr./ar.oc owes rar.a...[ neKx w■ riA[l ' f ae Iql Mn, u Ir.■r O'i fi ro.wwe e4w r raL f.lr!. ou. -w•. ram Ira tear ma neriw f ec I.e. 14R u .r..r. f..4 .R NWRYr as NORTN L.Or4 Y•..l lapx q• ROw.f Oa. uR .aRnf ...r ore. ar ....:f .RJ, rr Yl r•a■ .a.owa (• � pp• r e.c m •' ron r 00 elA.e M Y.rd..Q nl■r .M9t. m rKY sa.NO�a RY1 e..a R .r um r ...r.r Y err � .r M 1rt w A RYw•. .l RYn MILL ..K .r YYr J V.KI •r M r.w M! .w RYw• YNtl•A .arn e.rt .n R .•/w•q MlwteO f.w. IR . O.OR nNLn .a. RIArO YO.00e:01 A •a/w ..N■A RY! �.tlK • .01 [falQa �41.11.A Ml YRe ae. Y .eoou T rrw OR n M Aotf n. fQ Yrr ae. W rrrlltM rrq •r M rpww u.\. a.oa.rre.e .rsN Jr.QI/ n ...r..I w waf :we.0 f M. •aw. r .rrw W. a.rr a n. s .rNS !rave m� e•K .\lf fu! �nrr wK -Ma . nar.R o.K er am .m•a .rc aIN a rx sew arm r\[ Wo•. a. Rn. pl0 Nn • IO I IrYI •r. • I.J AJ.ar rJarwf ..O of •par 1r.A . of I f•r a n. • 1N . w . ru•q o^ us.na •w az iww uwowiawwi .:rw � • wn man (ir s n.s.ail Rc :14 1 fs rr.r •ru I.I 71,Z ;I PU r,.K. Iry :YfL.YR G G G G G 11 1 li'll -111 ei di s A f r® rw .! • fl�D Y ..L f.! LAN;SCAPN CONCEPT PLAN t Li t FL OOR Pl AV wuL: tp• . r -o � 4.1 �i GENERAL NOTES eun.gHa: • uwows.a rr.f.vm�i.at. tti ►• } u .ror.Ir..•. f ,a ..00r .W �m w.f -•K a urns r.aWfrwnwnr•ep 4. tt•17.0 fe.rN.wK.... ,.f .K •s■l.a,.r [ uasw Wfrrw.wn�•Ly Hei u.91 ! U.A ..nWfYwf•f M.Ky 4. P•• T ..... O.r ib .Y � � r��4'!!r�--��f...0��vr•R ..I.wif�w•YS • MIf. SST f atQ P•[llM 11fa N f fa'. • ,ft � v.sf . w r f.w A vv- �� ti .f.t ,c v .m Of.R .ff u. • .IL M (M.I f.r•. r..R O ! A Y ■Y rl 41R, Q O@ Y}w �L� ..faam■.,.,•.a .I ..R G w � PwrRRl.OU�f .�i �ts.i iuw •" G wsc wera• w .suw sra ■ r..� . •ww 0 U■O.wr.•Ugrta Q7w e.w 11. U.O. .4 .wfr•4■.R \ U..IK .M f.•Ore•rf 101r..O ..■ • rwrn.. I•M I �.ewa... rvL .rrrn .r U N • \L .O tfrf• .MIA • A.Ar wrr. w..0 to O ■fA '�• 1.... 4w f...t. - ■ ..tf u nw .f.■O W +.. ruf w. ww..w . a.— tru ,w rwr•..rr turr...s. it ri ffti£L07R n .I .r.a a}rw • ■srw .w ...�fa ri■ •L01A w4�Or3 Ir•tUD w K frM OIYH. W■ r rrif ia11.Na YOU 1 4Q .■ Rw f•tenf r fo w e ..rw w .sa A. u K .Otl.fl 4 .■. n .w W r•wf wr•.a ry a.rw r w R •Ms w Y —r a.Q......r.r. r —wf. v.YR 0R ■ U•.Pp .! ■ w a I w .. .t N M1O ■t6 .lt ■flf .rL\ ►.I. ■\ILfrA wN } Ot[r.4 .•�M l ,Mr .•.wI l•.. u...0 w.urf a R K .Lf. O•L w twL wIS . u[.ra rwe �' 7 }. w wro •.f r.wrn w Ow.■6 .\L nce — 4 t �1 KITCHEN: = . oa.•. o�..f u � ►u� raawca u w 1 < e a i LwrOii % o�rLr�t..we nwe n wa ` = i �i ACCESSIBILITY NOTES t iNft W 011. tw YQ fw . •t wfa w as t.a aQa r ..r.f! ' rb -.rr.w f,'/C .WI ■ !KR.w..frRrf blfA.fO w wYY M•10..•1,r14 .► y. a s..n ■ .L.. •w W Or p ®u r.•Q t�ow�w.t+wlf.e ..a rd ..0 I= • uf..s 1 ■.m...\Ww. R■ /U. K1vo +IL.• .sw w tr....r sawr■■a ..Lmw.... }�• w l ► M I M— r.. rT w .Ot4 ..R •t... t/� ... r ■r I ..n L•L t/�A{ l ■.tgpr f•w iM 011.frnW■ ,•� •• • w•• • ••n FLOOR PLAN 3 L ..f ..f r.ut.a .•... rv}• � rf on ,auto w • tf r ool ro srl r...p 11A IN ..M ..•■ •trw\ w rM0 ,o LLL i[O mn. .ra• w w ra.rr.on ►...0 n •.f • .w..s �EXEM 1wi | | §. | WHY « | ■`�� {� � % Q § � | | | | q | Ile w ��� |- ° ■ ��� \| |, � p ! / §■ q ®|. | ■! |l,|l \ |$k - I His! || |�� o� h °�| pe k R 5 _ : a G § � ■a�,ss���,�.�_�_.���. |��.� M r \ /qjn� �• ■•�� |r =�/ HA 9 � §�| | |�■ ■��'� ¥��© ■ ■\ {��� �| h� � © ■| � � p■ � ■ | |� q � ■� - /�� � 2 | |� �!� � ��- | | ■� ■�_ � I-JIN ■ § n | ■ |q�| | �' m # a| | A� at ;1;112 \ ■ � ■| | § ;■�,� e mew, ��� -�� ■..! � ;| � � s � ■ ��� � � EIRST FLOOR ©� soot: 1/e• . �s Q— $, '6' oCVrtr0" Aso"m H4ltiom A • LL K eenew0 M*ul$ V �! 7 ' Si -uI < i! e� 1 a g� ra ter. ati u:�p -•r-r FIRST FLOOR PLAN A5 a 1� i1 t t� i L' SECQN' . V-O" PLAN ©dg S FRONT F1 FVATION (FAST) SCALE: I /$' - I' -C' A/ "Am*' RLGtLLSINF F1 EVATION (NORTH) n SCALE' I/M' O EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ®�-YAIDMN/fMSI -CCLN M1nm%pvm4 a 111tom Cncllf HASID- Uw, oAMl ,wfT of mum CEhol HASID w SAOtSK a DMMMM- Uwf DASI f" W GSM MMLAIiD MASS M ALUMM STWgIt STSrtM b M m METAL Com AO MA W& MSGllN[NR mu p uwI MP^ ISC GLC01" CIUMMCM I1 S' "Im REVEAL IM MT Mt Coarm IS CAMTAS A." » Nola, sm DuwaAa it MMM SMTTI14 Cum A I.Art rta N IrD MAOMOMCUM S OMC1T c W DAM nwa AMDOao C CMORA I TC MAIN A *aftf M WACC N DIM IDMAMi MC - Ut Tool C K loss C GIN w"m - WT PAL / 4 IONS M CMN WHAMS - MJTIMC S 1 K MY S DIM CCMAMS - MR.= CAM/ K Slt M Y MCA GAT MOPG ISS - WIN Mf - CD7p 20M CG DAM M MM M., MS - RD MCI[ / K IMT MIQF_URNCII ILVATMI I. ALL SCUM AD LID b tPW KPARAIC SIMrRK NO rOMMT (MIC.) 2 CA - K"" COMM imt ' ASM{M�LM(AM1Q(fAp1GM AC flod11lM1 . KSSry/tGS1[MK M :� CMHA�AfpL 1 OSLiC 9WlM[.N1D1G 41H gMmrt % ymm MGMwK IAyILM uM w>fa. I�9AM IA. Mma. u Mla 'rMwrr� :st.v..l. G G J ,rJ U ■I a r z r 7 P .OlMls MC �]! nC.a �[ 1 tO� Ci • i Mm�rc tIMA C. s•T. w • ti i ELEVATIONS A7 I BEAR ELEVATION (SOUTH) n SCALE 1 /Y' I FFT SLQ 1' I SCALE' 1 /Y' -O' AI 8' 16' 0S� tr s EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE YA07VAAtMl1 —Caa MIL_IYIMlOW" a M11EIYm CMM/1I MASTER- LWI OAS" I" 07 CXIER A CEND:"I "nit O" lACVIlK Or OM&PS- Upf DAlI !Yell 07 CLEAR MSIAAIEO QAlS 0 ALUAMW STOWMMI SnMV 01 HOLLOW 1(IAL COWS AND 111AKS, W30ELLAME 11Y 00 UWI !IOM• n OEC00GL DRA11I10S 11 i RASIU 0[S(AL I0 CLAY OU 00OM 1Y CANVAS A01WK 70 votmair Im mA1OlAt T Yom 9wnm CoL44 A -9 NEI CM YID OAMIO1OAO 0 OWL" C IIO DAM AMR MI0O7m E CCLOIIAtvm III MAIN AO0ami SU01ACE H OUM MANS - Ulu 10911 OC 1070 J MM EXAM - IM PILL I VE ME K AOYI EMAX - MYf1[0 0 / DE 1051 L DIAw EXAM - 94DMM DAME I OC 710 Y MCA CLAY Y0O010 1{S - VIM MI - CCIM IOM OAME M mm OWWAIDM - 1Y0 mg / K 1011 MT; Q101YOIL M"AIMM 1. ALL IMAQ AM LSO R UOIA SE►AYAR 9UIY1fAL NO /MYI puC► 1 CA . YLASIIl CMMM JO"1 3 M R ) .0.O A,S 0a1 MA C EX S OIL K P.IM 10 WIM 0.10, A. ALL E ILMIM~RMJUI MDRS. MO4 M:Am Iq 0O1K OO �D ITEM U - R..:.. City of Moorpark Community Development Department Staff Report PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 11, 2001 CPD 2000 -02 Commercial Planned Development Permit for a Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with drive - through service office /retail building APN 506 -0 -05 -050 ICEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration APPLICANT: Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty REQUEST: Commercial Planned Development Permit for a Jack- in -the- Box Restaurant with drive - through service and a two story office /retail building. The Planning Commission action is a recommendation to the City Council, who will take the final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and is subject to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and final action of the City Council. LOCATION: The proposed project is located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue one property west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Liberty Bell Road, north of the Arroyo Simi. HERTZ AVM ;v� SITE MAP LW s ; = 300 U.SSE J .: TEJEf4� 3�.: -'i LLJ UA `( AV A11' 6 ? 7 011 'W1 PROPOSED SITE? J`i Utz I DOS AV SEE `',,Ai E3 P."tyITA, CiR —1 �t VIte.A rY4t4SihlA AV RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommence to the uizy council Approval wizn conditions. \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \jackinbox.perpt6.11.01. AITAC H M E N T. 000092 Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 2 BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ACTIONS: No development permits have previously been approved on this site. However, a minor lot line adjustment (LLA97 -01) was approved on June 4, 1997 for the purpose of increasing the size of the property to the east to accommodate the existing development (gas pumps /mini- mart /car- wash /oil lube facility). ORDINANCES AND POLICIES: Section 17.20.060 of the Zoning Ordinance requires the filing and approval of a Commercial Planned Development Permit for the construction of buildings in the CPD (Commercial Planned Development) zone. Section 17.24.020B of the Code sets forth the criteria for setbacks, height limitation, etc. Chapter 17.32 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for parking and landscaping. Section 17.36.040 establishes general standards for commercial zones. GENERAL PLAN /ZONING DESIGNATION: Direction Gen.Pln Zoning Land Use Site: C -2 CPD Undeveloped North: C -2 CPD LA Ave and Commercial South: VH RPD Approved compact lots /SFD East: C -2 CPD Car wash /gas station & minimart West VH RPD Approved compact lots /SFD Definitions: . VH (Very High Density Residential -15 units /acre maximum), RPD (Residential Planned Development) C -2 (General Commercial), CPD (Commercial Planned Development) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Commercial Planned Development Permit process for CPD 2000 -2 will establish the design and control for this proposed 2,868 square foot Jack -in- the -Box restaurant with drive - through service and the proposed 17,196 square foot two story retail /office building. No outside seating is proposed for the restaurant. A thirty six (36) foot wide curb -cut is proposed at the west side of the property directing access into the site via an on -site driving aisle which will parallel Los Angeles Avenue to approximately the center of the development where it will turn to the south and provide access to the proposed buildings and parking. In addition, Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 3 there is a fourteen (14) foot wide one -way access from the existing car -wash located east of the property onto this site. The proposed Jack -in -the -Box restaurant has overall dimensions of approximately 80 feet by 35 feet while the dimensions of the retail /office building are approximately 60 feet by 150 feet. The architectural style of this project is a French Provincial design with detailed features, including wood shutters, reveals, canvas awnings, clay tile roofing, wrought iron accents with various color combinations to vary the appearance. A more detailed discussion regarding architecture and design can be found later in this report. Entry to the drive - through will occur from the proposed curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue, turning southerly through the parking lot between the proposed Jack -in- the -Box restaurant and the retail /office building to the southeast corner. The drive - through exits at the northeast corner of the site through a one -way drive aisle west to the curb -cut located on the northwest corner of the site. Stacking within the drive aisle will accommodate approximately eleven (11) automobiles without interfering with internal circulation. A menu board and speaker is located approximately 95 feet from future single family homes abutting the south property line. Parking (including 2 handicapped parking spaces for each building) is located between and to the rear (south side of parcel) of each of the two buildings. One trash enclosure for each building is located adjacent and on the south side of the buildings. Staff has included a condition requiring that the trash enclosures be provided with pedestrian access, covered and screened. Public entrances to the Jack -in- the -Box restaurant take place at the front of the building (west elevation) and from the north side of the building. Public entry to the office /retail building downstairs lease spaces will be from the front (east elevation) while access to the second story will be provided by stairways at both the north and south side of the building as well as by an elevator located on the south side of the building adjacent to the proposed loading area. Decorative balcony treatments are proposed which will be non - functional, but will serve to enhance the French Provincial architectural theme. Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 4 The following are the site specifications for this proposed development: Gross Acreage of Parcel Gross Floor Area Percent of Land Covered by Percent of Land Covered by Percent of Land Covered by Percent of Land Covered by Aisle &Driveway Percent of Land Covered by and Drive - through aisles, Gross Floor Area: Buildings Landscaped Areas Parking Area Entry Cross Access 73,100 sq. ft. 19,728 sq. ft. 15.70 15.70 47.7% 6.7% Walks, Trash Areas, not in parking areas 14.20 Jack -in- the -Box 2,868 sq. ft. Retail /Office Building First Floor 8,633 sq. ft. Second Floor 8,563 sq. ft. Total Floor Area 20,064 sq. ft. DISCUSSION: Site Description: The subject site is a rectangular shaped parcel, with overall dimensions of approximately 340 feet (deep) by 215 feet (wide). The site is presently undeveloped and has exposed soil with little or no vegetation. A twenty -four (24) inch diameter piece of corrugated metal pipe is located in the south central portion of the site. The pipe is partially buried and may be part of a desilting basin structure. Site topography consists of relatively level terrain, dipping downward slightly to the east and south. Parking: Section 17.32 of the City's Municipal Code (Parking, Access and Landscape Requirements), establishes parking and landscaping requirements for commercial and industrial projects. As shown below, this proposed project has a total of eighty eight (88) parking spaces which exceeds the minimum number of parking spaces required (86 parking spaces required). The following are the parking requirements for the project: 00,0095 Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 5 Proposed Use Parking Required Proposed Spaces Fast Food Restaurant (1 /100 sq. ft.) 29 30 Retail /Office Bldg. (1/300 sq. ft.) 57 58 Total Parking Spaces 86 88 Loadina Area: Section 17.32.090 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that commercial developments over 3,000 square feet be required to have a loading zone unless otherwise waived by the Director of Community Development. For this project, a loading zone (13 feet wide by 50 feet long) is provided at the southerly side of the proposed retail /commercial building. Although the Jack -in- the -Box does not show a formal loading zone, the applicant has indicated that loading typically takes place at the rear of the building in the drive aisle located approximately twenty eight (28) feet west of the drive - through lane. The loading in this area. The plan has been designed to accommodate truck turning movements in this area. Landscaping Along Los Angeles Avenue Section 17.24.020B of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum thirty (30) foot building setback from four lane arterial streets with a minimum of ten (10) feet of landscaping along the street frontage. As proposed, this project provides an average of thirteen (13) feet of landscaping adjacent to an eight (8) foot wide sidewalk and curb along the Los Angeles Avenue. Although the applicant's proposal meets the minimum Code requirement, it is inconsistent with the streetscape along the southerly side of Los Angeles Avenue for other commercial and residential projects in the adjacent area. Both the Burger King Restaurant as well as the car - wash to the east of this site have installed a minimum of twenty (20) feet of landscaping behind the sidewalk. The approved residential project to the west (RPD 96 -1 - Pacific Communities) will be providing approximately an eight (8) foot landscaped parkway, a six (6) foot sidewalk and approximately another eight (8) feet of landscaping behind the curb adjacent to a decorative sound wall. This proposed landscaping treatment along Los Angeles Avenue is not consistent with the landscaping standard of previously approved developments in the adjacent area. In order to maintain consistency with other developments and maintain an adequate Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 6 landscaping buffer along the that the site plan be modified of twenty (20) feet along the in a reduction in the size of both buildings. Site Landscaping: street frontage, it is recommended to provide a minimum landscape area street frontage. This could result the proposed building footprints for Approximately 15.7 percent of the site is covered by landscaping which exceeds the ordinance requirement. As proposed in the conceptual landscape plan, fifty seven (57 %) percent of parking lot area will be under canopy coverage. Mounded landscaping should be provided along the Los Angeles Avenue street frontage in order to be consistent with other developments along Los Angeles Avenue and to soften the view of the parking area. A condition to require mounding has been included as a condition in the attached draft resolution. The site plan shows a property line wall along both the southerly and westerly property line to be constructed by the adjacent property owner as part of the previously approved residential development projects (Residential Planned Development Permit Nos. 96 -1 and 99 -4 - Pacific Communities). A condition of the Residential Planned Development Permit required the construction of an eight (8) foot high wall adjacent to this commercial development. Should the residential project proceed prior to the commercial development, the wall will be completed prior to construction of the residences. However, if this proposed commercial development precedes development of the residential projects, the developer of the commercial site should be responsible for construction of the wall. Therefore, it is suggested that the developer of this project be conditioned for construction of the wall consistent with Section 17.32.080 of the Zoning Ordinance if the project precedes the residential developments. This will ensure that the first property to development will complete the property line wall establishing the required buffer between dissimilar land uses. Buildina Heiaht: The criteria contained within the development standards in Section 17.24.020B limits building height in the CPD zone to thirty five (35) feet without approval of a Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit. The maximum height to the top of the tower element of the Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant is 23 feet 10 inches and 000097 Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 7 the height of the two -story retail /office building is 35 feet 10 inches to the top of the tower element. The roof height of a pitched roof is determined by the "average midpoint ", therefore, the height of the two -story office /retail building is within the allowable height limit stated in Section 17.36.030 of the Zoning Ordinance. Setbacks: Section 17.24.020B of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum five (5) setback for commercial developments adjacent to residential uses and a thirty (30) foot building setback from any streets shown on the Circulation Element to have four or more lanes. The minimum setback from the front property line to the building exceeds forty (40) feet, while the setback along the west and south property lines adjacent to the proposed residences is ten (10) or more feet which is consistent with the Ordinance requirement. A potential issue between the office /retail building and the residential development to the west is that there are windows on the second story of this proposed building overlooking the approved residential project. This has the potential of creating a privacy issue due to the limited lot size and proximity to the common property line of two story homes which have 10 to 15 foot rear yards. Although the proposed property line wall is eight feet high, the presence of windows along the second story rear elevation of the office building will infringe on the privacy of the adjacent residents. This issue can be adequately addressed in a number of ways such as limiting the sill height of the window to six (6) or more feet, requiring a tree canopy adjacent to the westerly property line, etc. Architectural Style: The French Provincial architectural style of the proposed two -story office /retail structure is generally well executed although some coloration and window changes would be appropriate along with additional architectural detail. As expected, the architectural features and coloration appear to have been selected to blend with the Mediterranean and Spanish architecture of the adjacent commercial centers. Unfortunately, because of the color and material similarities with adjacent development, it is difficult to create an identity except through signage and the use of overly bold and out of place colors such as red awnings. Minor changes to the features noted above will result in a development which is 11' 0 a Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 8 compatible with adjacent development, yet distinctive enough to create its own identity. The office building roof should incorporate roof tiles that are gray, brown, or variegated brown and tan in color in a flat configuration, rather than an "S" tile. The red awning should be removed in favor of a green or brown awning and the stucco should be a medium to dark tan color as contrasted to the Navajo White which is proposed. These proposed color changes may be accommodated within the color selection which has been submitted. Additionally, the gable and hip roof treatment which are an integral part of the elevation of the east wall of the building should also be integrated into the west elevation or a continuous hip roof should be provided to avoid the "movie set" backside architecture that will otherwise result. As noted earlier in the report, the sill height of the second story windows on the west side of this building should be raised to a minimum height of six (6) feet to maintain privacy in the rear yards of the adjacent future single- family homes. Also, there should be no ground floor access except as required by the Building Code in the west building elevation. Therefore, no lease space could be created with pedestrian access for customers adjacent to the west. Additionally, the ground floor awnings should include a slight arc above the window where they are attached to the wall to give more emphasis to the French Provincial architectural theme. The one -story Jack -in- the -Box structure should be similarly modified as recommended for the office /retail building. Retention of the Jack -in- the -Box trademark signage /logo is provided for by the Sign Ordinance. However, the other coloration and architectural detail involving roof tiles and red awnings as noted earlier in this report should be modified. Arched awnings (green or brown in color) should be used throughout except at the utility room doors on the south elevation where the straight awning would remain more in the scale for the elevation. Decorative integral sidewalk paving around the buildings where pedestrian use predominates together with a similar treatment through the parking lot to form a connection between the Jack -in- the -Box and the office building would be appropriate to enhance the feeling of an integrated commercial development. Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 9 Phasing of Development: The architecture of the fast food restaurant to some extent compliments the architectural style of the retail /office building. However, the design of the retail /office building contains several elements reflective of a French Provincial architectural style which when combined with modifications to the architectural elements of the restaurant complements the architectural styles of neighboring commercial developments along Los Angeles Avenue. There is a concern that if the restaurant is built without the office /retail building, the desired architectural effect for the site may not be what decision - makers envision for the community and may result in a less than desirable end product as elements such as site design including circulation, landscaping and architectural cohesiveness may be compromised. In order to ensure the development of an integrated project, construction of both buildings should take place at the same time. This would ensure long term continuity of the architectural design, integration of the site plan, and provide for an integrated development. Therefore a condition requiring that development of this project occur in one phase or if phased that the office /retail building comprise phase one has been included in the draft resolution. Site Improvements and National Pollution Discharge Elimination Standards Requirements ( NPDES): The City Engineer has conditioned the project to provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain improvements including the imposition of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) requirements. "Passive" Best Management Practices.Drainage Facilities are required to be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. The City Engineer has indicated that in order to adequately address this requirement, the existing site plan may need to be substantially modified from it's current configuration because of the need for large landscaped grass areas to provide a passive filter to meet NPDES requirements. Traffic: A Traffic Study dated January, 2000, was conducted by Thomas Montgomery, and Associates to determine the potential impacts Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 10 associated with the additional traffic created by this project. According to the Traffic Analysis, the project will generate approximately 1900 vehicles per day with approximately 64 percent of the traffic being new traffic on the "study area street system ". The study concludes that the street system in the vicinity of the site is now operating at acceptable levels of service except at Los Angeles Avenue /Tierra Rejada Road - Gabbert Road during the afternoon peak and Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road during the morning peak. The minor congestion at Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road during the morning peak would not be significantly changed by the addition of traffic generated by this project. At total cumulative traffic demand levels in the year 2010, both the intersections of Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road are projected to be operating slightly in excess of design capacity during a typical weekday afternoon commuter peak travel period. Site generated traffic would not significantly contribute to the future traffic conditions. Therefore, it was concluded that the additional traffic that would be generated by the subject mixed -use development would not have any significant effect on the existing or future operation of the street system serving the study area. Air Quality: According to the Air Pollution Control District, this project will not result in a potentially significant impact on regional air quality, and contribute air pollutants to the air basin. A condition has been included in the draft resolution for the project consistent with conditions required on similar commercial projects within the City. The recommended condition requires a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund to fund Traffic System Management air quality improvement programs. OTHER AGENCY REVIEW: All conditions of approval from Agencies and Departments that have reviewed the Commercial Planned Development Permit have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for CPD 2000 -2. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The General Plan designation is C -2 (General Commercial) which is consistent with the existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development) zoning of the property. The development of a fast -food restaurant including drive - through and office /retail building is considered consistent with this existing land use designation. 00034601 Planning Commission Staff Report Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 June 11, 2001 Page No. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment, and based upon an Initial Study and analysis of available information, it was found that there is substantial evidence that the potential effects of the proposed project on the environment will not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore a Mitigated Negative Declaration is intended to be adopted in compliance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the requested entitlements prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2001- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2. ATTACHMENTS: 1. General Plan 2. Zoning Map 3. Project Exhibits 4. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 5. Draft Resolution including Mitigation Monitoring Plan 000102 MEN DOW am I�IiJ:�llt /•G� It� 7P� • •' • I gall ITEM City of Moorpark Community Development Department Planning Commission Staff Report DATE OF MEETING: July 9, 2001 (Continued from June 11, 2001 - Public Hearing open) CPD No. 2000 -02 Commercial Planned Development Permit for a Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with drive - through service office /retail building. IAPN 1506-0-05-050 ICEQA __7 Mitigated Negative Declaration APPLICANT: Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty REQUEST: Commercial Planned Development Permit for a Jack- in -the- Box Restaurant with drive - through service and a two -story office /retail building. The Planning Commission action is a recommendation to the City Council, who will take the final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and is subject to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and final action of the City Council.. LOCATION: The proposed project is located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue one property west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Liberty Bell Road, north of the Arroyo Simi. RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend to the City Council Approval with conditions. \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda 000105 Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc SITE MAP 10° " DAB10I i Poindexter �j CT AVE. OMAR Park IJ < < Veterans Chaparral z (n SECOND so Memonol Mddk o fRb LASSEN AVE I AyF School �o THIRD ST t ` Post Office � HERTZ ST 3 zo Y Police = SEN Reso � z CHALLENGER m < _ �+ AVE 3 " Mission Bell Ctr Plaza Center p < ROBE CT TEJE 5T .Town 3 Chamber o Flory ESTH D 'SCOVFRY Q EVEREST AVE cof School SHER. ° < AVE Veterans Memorial Retail Village � Moorpark Unified z Auto Center School District m UN A VE o z ¢ x WEAK AV = CAMPESINA MAJESTIC CT RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend to the City Council Approval with conditions. \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda 000105 Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 2 BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ACTIONS: This item was heard by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2001, and continued to July 9, 2001, to allow staff and the applicant additional time to resolve circulation, landscaping and building design issues, prior to the Planning Commission making a recommendation to the City Council. DISCUSSION: The primary focus of the Planning Commission's discussion on June 11, 2001, related to the issues noted above, which have been addressed by the applicant in the revised site plans and elevations attached to this report and evaluated as follows: Landscaping Along Los Angeles Avenue The initial site plan reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2001, included thirteen (13') feet of on -site landscaping along the public right -of -way of Los Angeles Avenue. Staff commented that twenty (20') feet was the standard for other similar projects on Los Angeles Avenue and an increase in the dimension of the landscaped area was appropriate. The revised plan illustrates a landscaped area that varies in width from fifteen (15') feet at the west end of the site where the access driveway to the parking lot is located, to twenty (20') feet in front of the Jack -in- the -Box, extending to the east property line. All landscaping is noted as on the development site. As previously noted, the adjacent residential project to the west (Pacific Communities, Residential Planned Development No. 96 -01) is required to install an eight (8') foot, landscaped parkway adjacent to the curb, a six (61) foot sidewalk and an additional eight (81) feet of landscaping adjacent to the project sound attenuation wall. A transition of the landscape cross - section would take place within this project as the sidewalk will move from a point next to the curb on the Mobil Station, to eight (8') feet behind the curb on Pacific Communities. The applicant has also addressed the issue of pedestrian movement onto the site from the west by incorporating a sidewalk at the west property line, west of the curb cut and driveway apron into this site. In addition, colored stamped concrete has been added at the driving aisle adjacent to the street. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 3 Staff continues to support a minimum of twenty (201) feet of on- site landscaping along the Los Angeles Avenue frontage. Applicant's proposed modification to the landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue is not consistent with the landscaping standard of previously approved developments in the adjacent area. In order to maintain consistency with other developments and maintain an adequate landscaping buffer along the -street frontage, it is recommended that the site plan be modified to provide a minimum on -site landscaped area of twenty (201) feet along the Los Angeles Avenue street frontage. Building Height The height of the buildings was another concern of the Planning Commission, which has been addressed by the applicant. The height of the retail /office building, especially as it impacts future residential development to the west, was a concern of the Planning Commission. The original height'of the proposed structures to the ridgeline of the various tower elements was 3619" - which has been reduced by eighteen (18 ") inches to thirty -five (35') feet. These tower elements which are on the east side of the building would have only a minimum impact on the residential project. On the west elevation there was a tower element only at the north center of the retail /office building at a height of 3619" which has been reduced in height to approximately thirty -four (34') feet. The remaining initial west elevation involved a parapet wall with the top of the parapet at 2716 ". This wall /roof design has been replaced by a combination of tower elements and a shed roof that has a facia element at approximately twenty -two (22') feet with a ridgeline height of approximately 2516 ". Additionally, to respond to concerns about the west elevation architecture, four (4) tower elements have been added with hip roof design and a ridgeline height of approximately thirty -two (32') feet. Although some increase in the height of various elements of the building has taken place, other elements have been included or reduced in height, which results in a more pleasing elevation less monolithic in appearance. Architectural Style As shown to the Planning Commission on June 11, 2001, the architectural features and coloration appeared to have been selected to blend with the Mediterranean and Spanish architecture S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc 000107 Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 4 of the adjacent commercial centers, which made it difficult to achieve a sense of individual identity except through signage and the use of overly bold and out -of -place colors, such as red awnings. Staff recommended minor changes including: • Incorporation of flat roof tiles that are gray, brown, or variegated brown and tan in color. • Green or brown awnings. • Medium to dark tan building color as contrasted to the Navajo White. • Incorporation of the gable and hip roof treatment into the west elevation or a continuous hip roof. • Increase in the bottom sill height of the second -story windows on the west side of the retail /office building should be raised to six (6') feet minimum to maintain privacy in the rear yards of the adjacent, future, single- family homes. • Ground floor awnings to include a slight arc above the window where they are attached to the.wall to give more emphasis to the French Provincial architectural theme. As noted under the discussion concerning building height, several tower /roof elements with hip roof design have been added to the west elevation. Additionally, a shed roof element has been incorporated between the lower elements replacing the parapet, which incorporates more detail and a less imposing fagade as it slopes away from the adjoining future residential development. The applicant has also made the following modifications to the coloration and facade. The roof tile has been changed to a dark brown, flat, concrete tile' and the red awnings have been substituted with dark green, round, canvas awnings. The color palette has been modified for both buildings by providing a dark brown color base (Dunn Edwards Nutmeg TI -DE -1037) around the perimeter of the buildings to a height of approximately three (3') feet. The overall building color will be a light, yellow brown (Dunn Edwards Little Toot DE 1029) with the towers and wall elements beginning at the second story proposed with a color hue � f�:l S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 5 between the base and the walls (Dunn Edwards Buff Pill DE 1028). The Jack -in- the -Box has used this color only on the tower elements. An additional accent trim color has also been added to the fascia and parapet cap of the buildings (Dunn Edwards Wild Rone DE 1041) which is a very light chocolate color. Circulation The Planning Commission had significant comment and concern relating to on -site circulation and site access for the proposed uses; both of which are likely to generate substantial vehicle trips. The current proposal provides a connection between the subject site and the Mobil Station /Mini Mart to the east for traffic to travel in a westbound direction only from the gas station to this project. Absent this connecting driveway, the only access to the proposed project is through the curb cut proposed on Los Angeles Avenue. The Mobil Station Commercial Planned Development and Conditional Use Permit (CPD No. 97 -01 and CUP 97- 02) were conditioned to provide for cross traffic flow and sharing of curb cuts, but details of this circulation concept were not specified. The owner of the Mobil Station has been contacted on several occasions concerning the provision of access and circulation between that site and Jack -in- the -Box in the southerly portion of the site; however, this point of access has been declined thus far. During the June 11th hearing, the Planning Commission heard reference by various speakers concerning the content of the recorded document that could provide access from Liberty Bell Road to the proposed Jack -in- the -Box site. A copy of the recorded agreement has been attached to this report. This agreement provides that adjustments in driveway locations on the Mobil Station site may take place, and requires relocation of the Mobil Station driveway on Los Angeles Avenue, such that one -half (1/2) of the driveway is on the Mobil Station site and one -half (1/2) is on the Jack -in- the -Box site. Based upon this recorded document, no other internal connections are required. This development site, because of the limited access may not serve well as a location for a fast -food restaurant. Traffic demand is usually high and access from many directions is usually preferred. The striping plan submitted together with the other project revisions discussed in this report has been analyzed by the City Engineer, who has provided the following comment: OOOJL09 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 6 Unless the traffic striping is changed, it would be possible for westbound Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118) traffic to make a left -hand turn into the project. This is highly undesirable because the left turning traffic has no turning pocket or lane to decelerate in prior to turning left. This would necessitate the left turning vehicle to decelerate in the westbound number one (most southerly) lane. This circumstance will significantly increase the potential for traffic accidents caused by through traffic overtaking and striking turning vehicles from behind. To avoid this potential traffic problem, the solid double lines and island chevrons should be extended well past the westerly property line of the proposed project. If this is done, the westbound Los Angeles Avenue traffic wishing to enter the site will have to continue westerly to Shasta Avenue (future signal), execute a u -turn and return to the site as eastbound traffic. Although the travel to Shasta Avenue and the u -turn movement will consume a portion of the traffic capacity of Los Angeles Avenue, the u -turn will be a protected movement and should not impact traffic safety any more than the increment in traffic congestion that it will cause. In addition to the above comments, it is recommended that the cross parcel driveway proposed near the Los Angeles Avenue right -of -way be eliminated because of the significant potential for traffic conflicts on both commercial properties, as well as on the public street. As noted earlier, traffic flow was east to west only, and movement through this connecting drive could encourage vehicles to travel through the Mobil Station from Liberty Bell Road to get to Jack -in- the -Box or the retail office building. At this time, since the Mobil Station owner will not provide any other point of access from Liberty Bell Road, the Planning Commission must decide if direct access only from Los Angeles Avenue is sufficient for the proposed commercial uses. Staff has concluded that the situation is marginal, and that many u -turns will take place at the future signal at Shasta Avenue, and that westbound vehicles on Los Angeles well attempt left turns onto the site. As this project is currently proposed, and based upon closure of the connecting driveway between Jack -in -the Box and the Mobil Station, and if the center median (no turns allowed) is extended to the west on Los Angeles Avenue, access to this site will be extremely limited, especially for uses which typically depend upon high traffic counts. 0001OLI0 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc Planning Commission Staff Report - Jack -in- the -Box Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 July 5, 2001 Page No. 7 Miscellaneous Changes Included in the June 11th staff report was a recommendation for decorative paving to be installed at strategic locations to tie the center together, especially for pedestrian movement. Decorative paving has been included on the entrance drive parallel to Los Angeles Avenue and should also be included in front of the buildings and as a crossing between buildings for pedestrian movements. The applicant has responded to concern for privacy within the adjacent future single family residential project by illustrating that the bottom sill height of the second story offices in the westerly building will be a minimum of six (6) feet above the finish floor level. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: As noted by the June 11th staff report, an environmental determination has been prepared for this project consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared based upon the fact that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The previously prepared environmental documents should be referred to and considered prior to making a recommendation to the City Council concerning this proposed project. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Accept additional public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for the requested entitlements, prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2001- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02. ATTACHMENTS: 1. General Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Revised Project Exhibits, 4. Copy of Access Agreement. 5. Draft Resolution including dated July 3, 2001. Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 000111 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \070501 Jack in the Box Staff Report - CPD No. 2000- 02.doc -��F CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Wayne Loftus, Director of Community Development, DATE: August 24, 2001, (PC meeting August 27, 2001) SUBJECT: Consider Continued Public Hearing on Proposal to Develop a Jack -in- the -Box Drive - through Restaurant and Two -story Office Building (Commercial Planned Development No. 2000 -02) on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue, West of Leta Yancy Road (APN 506 -0 -05- 050) - Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty; Applicants BACKGROUND This item, which was continued to this meeting from the Planning Commission meeting of July 9, 2001, was previously also heard by the Commission on June 11, 2001. The continuance to this date was directed by the Planning Commission to allow staff the time needed to further evaluate access to the proposed site with particular focus on the opportunity to achieve access across the adjacent parcel to the east of the subject site. At the Planning Commission meeting of July 9, 2001, the Commission illustrated concern relating to the lack of an access opportunity for traffic approaching this commercial site from all directions and discomfort with a second curb cut onto Los Angeles Avenue or joint access at Los Angeles Avenue with the adjoining gas station. The Commission requested that staff further evaluate an agreement for access (Attachment 1) that has been recorded between the owners of the sites involved which includes the adjacent gas station and at the time (August 1998) the subject property and an additional five (5) acres, south of S: \Community Development \Everyone \In Process Documents \Jack In The Box Stf 000112 Rpt 82701 PC.d1.82301.doc Planning Commission Agenda Report Jack -in- the -Box Drive - through Restaurant August 27, 2001 Page 2 the Mobil station and this potential Jack -in- the -Box site. This driveway location agreement has been further analyzed by the City Attorney as to its affect on both Parcel B (gas station /mini -mart) and the subject property proposed for a Jack - in- the -Box (Parcel A). Additionally, staff has clarified concerns about a joint use driveway between the two (2) parcels at the Los Angeles Avenue frontage. (Reference to Attachment 2.) DISCUSSION Staff has been able to talk to the City Attorney concerning the recorded agreement for curb cut and driveway relocation on the adjacent developed commercial site, where a gas station /mini- mart, car wash and lube facility are located. In response to staff questions, the following conclusions' are provided concerning details of the agreement related to curb cut and driveway locations signed by Gharebaghi and Sheshebor (Attachment 1): • The southerly curb cut /driveway was intended to straddle the property line between the gas station site and the adjacent property to the south, which was at the time, part of the property proposed for Jack -in- the -Box. At the time the property was panhandle in shape. The southerly property and the Jack -in- the -Box site were separated from each other through a Lot Line Adjustment which included other property proposed for development by Pacific Communities. The segmentation of the parcels removed the basic premise that the driveway would straddle Parcels A and B. As a result, the agreement concerning the south curb cut access driveway no longer has standing. • The westerly curb cut /driveway relocation at Los Angeles Avenue that is referenced to serve (straddle) both Parcel B (gas station) and Parcel A (Remaining portion is proposed for Jack -in- the -Box) has been addressed by staff and the Commission in the public hearings, noting the potential for conflicting traffic movements and consideration for controlling directional traffic flow. The attached letter to Jack -in- the -Box (Attachment B) clearly states concerns of staff relative to the joint curb cut on Los Angeles Avenue and as a result staff is unable to support the request by Jack -in- the -Box for this second point of access. S: \Community Development \Everyone \In Process Documents \Sack In The Box Stf Rpt 82701 0001103 PC.dl.82301.doc Planning Commission Agenda Report Jack -in- the -Box Drive - through Restaurant August 27, 2001 Page 3 • Based upon the language in the referenced agreement, the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development, under provisions of the agreement, have. the discretion concerning relocation of the driveways /curb cuts which would prevail even if the developer of Parcel A requested a relocation or owner of Parcel B was reluctant. However, because the City is not a signatory to the agreement, there is no obligation for the City to pursue the curb cut relocation if requested to do so by a future developer. Based upon the above factors which may result in only one (1) access point to serve a significant vehicle - oriented use and the potential for increased congestion at a major circulation corridor (Los Angeles Avenue) that will likely result from unauthorized and confusing traffic movement for westbound vehicles, this project should not be recommended for approval. There does not appear to be any design alternatives, except the possible placement of the driveway at or near the center of the Los Angeles Avenue frontage which may improve on -site access and circulation. This option has previously been evaluated, however there was not adequate stacking area near Los Angeles Avenue to insure avoidance of vehicles blocking the travelway. This approach however does not address the question of access for westbound traffic that would be precluded from taking access to the site through left turns across the Los Angeles Avenue median. Should the Planning Commission conclude that this project be continued for additional review, specific direction to staff would be appropriate. Recommendations for denial will require a modified resolution from that previously prepared and direction concerning findings should be considered. However, if the Planning Commission concludes that a recommendation of approval is in order, the attached resolution with some modifications, together with the Conditions of Approval (minor changes may be needed) would be viewed as suitable. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept public testimony; close the public hearing. 2. Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to making a recommendation. 0®0114 S: \Community Development \Everyone \In Process Documents \Jack In The Box Stf Rpt 82701 PC.d1.82301.doc Planning Commission Agenda Report Jack -in- the -Box Drive - through Restaurant August 27, 2001 Page 4 3. Direct the preparation of a Resolution recommending to the City Council denial of Commercial Planned Development No. 2000 -02, based upon inadequate access and circulation and other findings as may be appropriate. Attachments: 1. Curb cut /driveway agreement. 2. Letter - Michael Palmer, dated 8/16/01. 3. Staff Report /Resolution packet prepared for Planning Commission meeting of July 9, 2001. 4. Mitigated Negative Declaration. S: \Community Development \Everyone \In Process Documents \Jack In The Box Stf Rpt 82701 000115 PC.d1.82301.doc RESOLUTION•NO. PC- 2001 -411 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2000 -02 ON THE APPLICATION OF JACK -IN- THE -BOX RESTAURANTS AND ACRES REALTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE NORTH OF THE ARROYO SIMI, WEST OF LIBERTY BELL ROAD. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 506 -0 -05 -050) WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on June 11, 2001, July 9, 2001, and August 27, 2001 the Planning Commission considered Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 on the application of Jack -in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty for a 2,868 square foot Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant with drive - through service and a 17,196 square foot two story retail /office building located one (1) property west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Liberty Bell Road (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0- 05 -050; and WHEREAS, at its meetings of June 11, 2001, July 9, 2001 and August 27, 2001 the Planning Commission conducted public hearings, received public testimony and continued this item hearing open each succeeding meeting and on August 27, 2001, closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS: 1. The Mitigated Negative Declaration /Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. 2. The contents of the Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program have been considered in the various decisions on the proposed entitlement request. S:ICommunity DevelopmedEveryone\PC FINAL REAR 'ImMDM C A, T 4 000116 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 2 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth above, it has been determined that this application with the attached conditions meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. 3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. 4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character; and WHEREAS, the Planning- Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and public testimony, has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the aforementioned project is consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. S:1Community Development\EveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000117 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 3 SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13) of the Public Resources Code of the State of California (beginning at Section 210001, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. 2. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program be adopted. 3. Approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 subject to the conditions of Exhibit A (Conditions of Approval) and Exhibit B (Mitigation Monitoring Plan) to this Resolution. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DiCecco, Haller and Landis, Vice Chair Otto and Chair Parvin NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF AUGUST, 2001. f 'Janice Parvin, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Acting Community Development Director Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Mitigation Monitoring Program S:1Community DevelopmenftEveryone\PC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000118 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 4 EXHIBIT A TO APPROVING RESOLUTION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000 -02 A. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY CONDITIONS: 1. Permitted Uses - This permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions. All proposed uses of these buildings shall be required to receive a Zoning Clearance from the Department of Community Development. The Department may determine that certain uses will require other types of entitlements or environmental assessment. 2. Other Regulations - This development is subject to all applicable regulations of the CPD Zone, and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, Ventura County, City authorities, and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 3. Discontinuance of Use - This Commercial Planned Development Permit shall expire when any of the uses for which it is granted is abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive days. 4. All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, building colors and materials, sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 5. Use Inauguration - Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his or her S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneW FINAL RESO* 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000119 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 5 discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if Applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one (1) year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 6. Abandonment of Use - Upon expiration of this permit, or failure to inaugurate the use, the premises shall be restored by the permittee to the conditions existing prior to the issuance of the permit, as nearly as practicable.' 7. Other Regulations - No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 8. Severability - If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 9. Permittee Defense Costs - The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his or her sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his or her obligation under this condition. 10. Zoning Clearance Prior to Building Permit - Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development. If an Applicant desires, construction plans may be submitted to the Building and Safety Department prior to approval of this S:1Community DevelopmenAEveryonelPC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPO 2000 -02.doc 000120 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 6 development permit with a City approved Hold Harmless Agreement. 11. Zoning Clearance Required for Occupancy - Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Zoning Clearance shall be to determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 12. Certificate of Occupancy Requirement - No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety Department. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the Applicant has provided a faithful performance bond. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development, said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the City Council. 13. Loading and Unloading Operations - Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. unless approved by the Director of Community Development. 14. Tenant Occupancy - Prior to the occupancy, applicable proposed uses shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the proposal will comply with all applicable State and local regulations related to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the Applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. 15. Change of Ownership Notice - No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of S:ICommunity DevelopmentkEveryone\PC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000121 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 7 lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. 16. Other Uses - If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zoning Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the CPD Zone and the terms and conditions of this permit, and if a Minor or Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit is required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. 17. Business Registration - Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. 18. Acceptance of Conditions - The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 19. Fish and Game Requirement - Within two days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this Industrial Planned Development Permit, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250 plus a $ 25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and (b) Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; (c) the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 20. On -site Improvements - No Zoning Clearance may be issued for building occupancy until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been provided or the Director of Community Development approves the acceptance of a S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryone\PC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc �T Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 8 Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of exterior improvements not related to grading, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full force and effect for one year after occupancy to guarantee that improvements not related to grading are maintained. 21. APCD Review of Uses - Prior to occupancy, Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials. Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District is provided. 22. Utilities Assessment District - The Applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground Utility Assessment District. 23. Continued Maintenance - The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) days after notification. 24. Noxious Odors - No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 25. Uses and Activities to be Conducted Inside - All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development and consistent with applicable Zoning Code provisions. 26. Graffiti Removal - The Applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days S:1Community DevelopmenfiEveryone\PC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000123 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 9 from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 27. Development of the uses .proposed by the application may be phased, except that the office /retail building together with full wall treatment along the residential property line, if required, site landscaping, parking, circulation and trash /recycle facilities required to serve the office building, shall constitute Phase I, unless otherwise determined by the City Council. No Zoning Clearance, building permit, or any other approval needed to construct the restaurant with drive - through shall be issued until a building permit shall have been issued for the office /retail building. Zoning Clearance and building permits for both proposed structures may be issued concurrently. The office /retail building shall be granted a Certificate of Occupancy prior to or concurrently with the granting of a Certificate of Occupancy for the restaurant with drive - through. 28. Case Processing Costs - The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all City legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. In addition, the Applicant shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements of the most recently adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits. 29. Code Enforcement Costs - The Director of Community Development may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance ". The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000124 00124 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 10 B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. Submittal of Landscape Plans - Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a complete landscape plan (3 sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to Grading Permit approval. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for manufactured slopes over three (3) feet in height. The purpose of the landscaping shall be to control erosion, prevent aesthetic impacts to adjacent property owners, mitigate the visual impacts of all manufactured slopes three (3) feet or more in height, and to replace mature trees lost as a result of construction. The final landscape plans shall also be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. The Applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape inspection. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. The landscaping shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and in place and receive final inspection prior to recordation of the map or occupancy as determined by the Director of Community Development. All landscaped areas shall have an irrigation system. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. The final landscape plans shall include landscaping specifications, planting details, and design specifications consistent with the following requirements: a. The permittee shall provide for additional enhanced landscaping equal to or greater than the cost of any trees to be removed as determined by the Director of Community Development. Additional trees, which form a canopy, shall be provided to shade parking, driveway areas and other areas as determined by the Director of Community Development to offset the value of the trees S:1Community DevelopmedEveryoneW FINAL RES01po 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000125 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 11 removed from the site. The landscape plan shall also incorporate extensive tree landscaping including_ specimen size trees as approved by the Director of Community Development along Los Angeles Avenue, and as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development. b. The landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue shall be increased to a minimum of twenty (20) feet in front of the parking area and bermed as approved by the Director of Community Development. C. Trees shall be added along the south and west property lines adjacent to the approved residential project. The size, type and number of trees to be planted shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. d. The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths within the project limits. e. All plant species utilized shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. f. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. g. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. h. Landscaping shall be designed to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. i. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of light at ground level. S:1Community DevelopmedEveryone\PC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 00026 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 12 j. Earthen berms, hedges and /or low walls shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from adjacent streets. k. Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above ground utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and /or a wall. 1. A sufficiently dense tree - planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees. and /or shrubs shall be designed. Fifty (50) percent (or as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development) of all trees shall be a minimum of 24 inch box size in order to provide screening in a three (3) to five (5) year time period. All other trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon in size. Recommendations regarding planting incorporated in the environmental document shall be incorporated to the degree feasible into the screening plan. M. Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping, as identified in the approved landscape plan. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the irrigation system and all landscaping. The Applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the development. n. All perimeter and /or garden walls shall be constructed prior to installation of any sidewalks or concrete slabs. o. Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. p. Prior to Final Inspection, the areas to be landscaped, as shown on the irrigation plan, shall be landscaped and irrigation system installed. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. SXommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneW FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 0 00 :'� Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 13 q. Any conflicts between light standard locations and tree locations in the parking lot shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 2. Offer of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance - Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement to the City for maintaining all landscaping of the site adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. The area referred to shall be all landscaped portions of the required setback area adjacent to the public right -of -way along the street frontages. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the aforementioned area as well as the landscaping within the public right -of -way adjacent to the project. If the City at it's sole discretion determines the landscape maintenance is determined to be unsatisfactory in any of the aforementioned areas, the City may invoke the offer of dedication and assume responsibility at the owner's expense for any or all of the aforementioned areas. The total cost of maintenance for the areas noted above shall be borne by the Applicant. The City may at its sole discretion place the aforementioned areas in a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. The Applicant shall record a covenant to this effect. The Applicant shall maintain the right to protest the amount and spread of any proposed assessment, but not the formation of, or annexation to a maintenance Assessment District. 3. The Building Plans or Plot Plan, and Elevations shall be revised to reflect the following: a. The second story windows located along the west elevation of the proposed retail /office building shall have a minimum bottom sill height of six (6) feet or as otherwise as determined by the Director of Community Development to reduce the visibility from the second story offices to the approved residential development. b. If this proposed development precedes development of the residential properties to the south and west of this project, the applicant /developer of this project shall be responsible to construct an eight (8) foot high wall along the west and south property lines, the design of which is subject to the review and approval S:1Community DevelopmedEveryone\PC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000128 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 14 by the Director of Community Development. The wall shall be constructed prior to commencement of grading. C. A proposed entry from Los Angeles Avenue, the ene way and the drive - through for the fast -food restaurant shall include decorative pavement such as brick, interlocking pavers, cobblestones or other materials with colors and design consistent with the proposed architecture. The colors and design are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. d. The Los Angeles Avenue frontage shall be landscaped with a minimum planted area, twenty (20') feet in depth behind the back of the curb, consistent with the landscape cross - section of the approved Residential Planned Development (RPD No. 96 -01 and Tract 5053) to the west. As determined by the Director of Community Development, the landscape cross - section shall include but is not limited to, an eight (8') foot parkway adjacent to the curb, separating the curb from the sidewalk which shall be a minimum of six (6') feet in width. An additional landscaped area, a minimum of eight (8') feet in width, shall be placed on the south side of the sidewalk, north of any parking lot paving. There shall be a transition from this landscape cross - section to appropriately connect to the landscape cross - section of the commercial development to the east as determined by the Director of Community Development. e. The transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall or landscaping. f. All fences and walls shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan. g. Bicycle racks or storage facilities shall be provided on -site as determined by the Director of Community Development. S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL29 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 15 h. All required loading areas and turning radius shall be depicted on the plot plan. A 45 -foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. i. Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. j. Modify the architectural detail and coloration to be consistent with the comments included within the Planning Commission Staff Report, dated June 11, 2001, and as required by the Director of Community Development to adhere to required Conditions of Approval. Architecture shall be modified to include, but not be limited to, the second story sill height along the westerly elevation of the office building and to provide for signage of the units on the first floor level. k Access to the proposed site shall include a driveway and access easement to Leta Yancy Road near the southerly property line. The access easement and proposed joint curb cut at Los Angeles Avenue between the Mobil Oil facility and the subject property shall be eliminated and the subject property shall take access to Los Angeles Avenue only at the proposed curb cut near the west property line of the proposed development Should access to the subject property from Leta Yancy Road via an easement driveway adjacent to the south property line not be achievable, sole access from Los Angeles Avenue via U -turns at Leta Yancy and Shasta Avenue may be considered, provided that a traffic study indicating there is no impact to Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118) traffic flow resulting from the U -turn required for access to this project at Leta Yancy Road and Shasta Avenue. The study shall meet the requirements of the Director of Community Development and City Engineer, and shall be completed and accepted by them prior to a determination of acceptability by the Citv Council. 4. Skylights - If skylights are used, the material utilized shall be designed so as to minimize the light from the SXommunity DevelopmentlEveryone\PC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000130 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 16 inside of the building to the exterior. Skylights are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. 5. Parapet Wall Requirement - Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the flat roof area. 6. Lighting Plan - For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development with the required deposit for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: avoid interference's with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height; provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility and minimize energy consumption. Ornamental lighting fixtures to complement the architectural style of the buildings are required on the building as well as in the parking lot area as determined by the Director of Community Development. Light poles within the parking lot area shall be located on cement bases no higher than six (6 ") inches above the finished grade. When possible, light poles shall be located within proposed landscaped areas. All lighting shall be consistent with Section 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance (Lighting Regulations) and the lighting plan shall, at a minimum, include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20') feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10') foot grid center. Down lighting and accent, landscape and building lighting shall be employed throughout the project. b. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be twenty (201) feet with the exception of lighting fixtures within twenty (201) feet of the adjacent residential properties which shall be lower than the required property line wall. S:ICommunity Development\EveryonelPC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc n «� iJ0®133 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 17 c. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one (1') foot candle illumination at or beyond property lines. d. Energy efficient lighting devices shall be provided. e. A minimum of one and a maximum of two -foot candle illumination with a 1.5 -foot candle average or as otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. f. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from the street. g. Lighting devices in the parking lot shall be shielded and directed downward to avoid light and glare on neighboring properties. h. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with them unless tamper proof fixtures are approved by the Director of Community Development. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage resistant covers. i. Lighting at all exterior doors shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained two (21) foot candles at ground level. j. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a copy of the lighting plans .shall be submitted to the Police Department for review. 8. Location of Property Line Walls - All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 9. Downspouts - No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 10. Roof Mounted Equipment - Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for equipment that cannot be mounted on the ground and approved to be roof mounted by the Director of Community Development. No roof mounted equipment (vents, S:ICommunity DevelopmedEveryone'PC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000132 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 18 stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) may extend above any parapet wall, unless screened on all four sides by view obscuring material that is an intregal design element of the building. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof - mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. All screening shall be tall enough to block all ground level views as well as those from the street and shall be maintained during the life of the permit. Construction material shall match the color and material used in the construction of the buildings. Colors, materials and building appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof, etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible with the existing building and adjacent development and non - reflective in nature. 11. Exterior Ground Level Equipment - Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such as loading docks, cooling towers, generators, etc.) shall be screened from view by a masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development, and located a minimum of twenty (201) feet from any residentially zoned property. The wall shall be constructed of materials and colors consistent with the main building. 12. Building Materials and Colors - All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be those typical of the proposed French Provincial architecture and are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. 13. Noise Generation Sources - All roof - mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources will be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical Engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. S:1Community Development\EveryoneTC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000133 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 19 14. Striping of Spaces - The striping of parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible during the life of the development. 15. Parking Lot Surface - All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage., striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall be maintained at all times to insure safe access and use by employees, public agencies and service vehicles. 16. Disposal Areas on Plot Plan - All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be totally covered and screened with a six foot high solid wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be subject to review of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City staff responsible for recycling /solid waste management programs. a. Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate, accessible and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of collection in the area in which the project is located. b. Adequate number of bins or containers shall be provided to allow for the collection and loading of recyclable materials generated by the development. For commercial (general, office, or retail), developments, space allotment for two (2) three cubic yard bins (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.5 ") , or a space allotment for one (1) 40 cubic yard bin (288" x 120 ") and one (1) 3 cubic yard bin (84" x 53.5). The intended use for this space is to hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers (one for refuse, one for recyclables), or one (1) 40 cubic yard SXommunity DevelopmentEveryone\PC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL34 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 20 bin for refuse and one (1) 3 cubic yard for recyclables. The dimensions provided apply to the space available when the gate is fully open. C. The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be architecturally consistent with the development and compatible with the surrounding area as approved by the Director of Community Development. d. Disposal areas shall be protected from weather conditions, which might render collected recyclable materials unmarketable. e. Driveways or travel aisles shall provide unobstructed access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or other specified clearance required by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. f. A sign, approved by the Director of Community Development, clearly identifying all recycling and solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials accepted therein shall be posted adjacent to all points of access to the recycling areas. g. Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or maintained as unencumbered, according to fire and other applicable building and /or public safety laws. h. Recycling area(s) shall be located so they are convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas. i. Each refuse /recycling enclosure shall be screened with a six (6') foot high solid masonry wall enclosure and six (6') foot high gates and shall be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open position. j. Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access requirements of Title 24 and the American Disabilities Act. S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 21 k. The enclosure shall have a separate indirect pedestrian access way, which does not require doors or gates. 17. The franchised refuse hauler designated to service this location will be determined prior to construction. 18. Other requirements related to refuse disposal and recycling include: a. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of the building. The plan shall include a designated building manager, who is responsible for initiating on- site waste materials recycling programs. This shall include the acquiring of storage bins for the separation of recyclable materials and coordination and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule. b. The building manager or designee will conduct a routine waste management education program on -site to alert employees to any new developments or requirements for solid waste management. This measure shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste Management Department. 19. Enforcement of Vehicle Codes: Prior to Occupancy of either of the buildings, the Applicant shall request that the City Council approve a resolution to enforce vehicle codes on the subject property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7. 20. Sign Program: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a comprehensive sign program for the entire project site shall be submitted to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. The sign program shall be designed to provide for a uniform on -site sign arrangement and design. a. All proposed signs shall conform to the approved sign program, prior to the issuance of a sign permit by the Director of Community Development or his designee. S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 22 b. No off -site signs shall be permitted. c. The approved sign program shall not exceed the signs permitted in the City's sign code. d. No pylon signs shall be permitted. 21. There shall be no access to building lease areas from the west elevation, except to meet required exiting provisions of the Uniform Building Code. C. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: 1. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements. 2. Concurrent with submittal of the grading plan an Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. 3. Requests for grading permits will be granted in accordance with the approved CPD 2000 -2, as required by these conditions and local ordinance. 4. CPD 2000 -2 does not indicate cut or fill quantities. Staff will be allowed to approve an import or export of 10,000 cubic yards of soil. Any additional import more than 10,000 cubic yards shall require Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. S. The Developer shall indicate in writing to the City Engineer the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No.3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000137 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 23 6. Temporary irrigation, hydro seeding or equal measures acceptable to the City Engineer for erosion and dust control shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to temporary grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days or the beginning of the rainy season whichever comes first. 7. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties will not be allowed without mitigation. 8. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Geotechnical Engineering report certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The geotechnical engineering report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The Developer shall also provide a report that discusses the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Note: Review of the geotechnical engineering report(s), by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, shall be required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative fee for this review. 9. All recommendations included in the approved geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soils report(s). 10. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000:138 QQ ®o��C7 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 24 hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: 1) All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm; 2) All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm; 3) All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; and 4) All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices (BMP's) Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices are not permitted. C. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public right -of -way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows including on -site detention shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way. When used in other locations they shall be S:1Community Development\EveryoneTC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000139 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 25 designed and constructed with provisions for adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right - of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. f. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 11. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm; and C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 12. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo." 13. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with five (5) or -more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively S:1Community Developmentkberyone\PC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL4 ) Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 26 prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 15. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 16. The following requirements shall be adhered to by the permittee: a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. C. Parking lots and drive - through areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - through areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive SXommunity DevelopmenAberyone\PC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000141 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 27 paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 17. Prior to the issuance of any [construction /grading permit] and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan ( SWPCP) , on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. C. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with S:ICommunity DevelopmedEveryone\PC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL42 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 28 Construction Activities). The applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). e. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 18. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 19. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans as may be required for Los Angeles Avenue prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with, the City of Moorpark, to complete public improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to the California Department of Transportation Standards (most recent version). The plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. 20. The street right -of -way improvements shall include adequate pavement for vehicle turnouts into the project, controlled access exiting the project, in addition to concrete curb and gutter, parkways, new streetlights, and signing, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer, the Director of Community Development and Cal Trans. The developer shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 21. Street lights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc O003.43 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 29 22. The final design and location of all barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping is subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 23. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall, provide for a surveyors statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. 24. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements will be acquired by the Developer at his expense. 25. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. The plans shall be required with the site grading plans for the review by, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 26. Utilities, facilities and services shall be extended and /or constructed in conjunction with any approved phased development by the developer as follows: Water & Sewer a. The developer will be responsible for the construction of all on -site and off -site sanitary sewer facilities to serve the project. The developer shall enter into an agreement with V.C.W.W. District No. 1 to construct the improvements and the system will be dedicated to V.C.W.W. District No. 1 for maintenance. b. Prior to Zone Clearance, the City, Calleguas Municipal Waterworks District and Ventura County Water District No. 1 shall approve final plans for water distribution. Either the Developer shall construct the required distribution facilities or enter into an agreement with the Calleguas Municipal Water District and /or Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 stating when and how facilities will be funded and constructed. The system will be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the proposed land uses and applicable City, Calleguas and V.C.W.W. District No. 1 standards. S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RHO# 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000144 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 30 27. All utilities shall be placed underground. 28. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for grading, the Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements which revert to the City (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. The surety shall include provisions for all site improvements within the development and other off -site improvements required by the conditions as described herein. 29. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 15 to April 15 subject to installation of debris and erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 15th and April 15th. a. All trucks that will haul off -site shall comply wit h 23114, with special 231144 (b) (2) (F) , (e) (2) regarding the prevention o public streets and roads. excavated or graded material State Vehicle Code Section attention to Section and (e)(4) as amended, f such material spilling onto b. On -site vehicle speeds shall not exceed 15 miles per hour. 30. Prior to any work being conducted within the State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. 31. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations, dust emissions should be controlled by regular watering with reclaimed water, if available, paving construction roads and other dust prevention measures. The Developer shall submit a dust control plan, acceptable to the city, concurrently with submittal of the grading plan. This plan shall include, but is not be limited to the following measures: S: Community DevelopmenflEveryonelPC FINAL RESO* 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL44 -i4 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 31 a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The Dust Control Plan shall indicate the number of water trucks, which will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) . The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. C. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Minimize the area disturbed at any one time by clearing, grading, earth moving and excavation so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. e. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. f. Face masks shall be used by all employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust, which may contain the fungus that causes San Joaquin Valley Fever. g. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 32. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast - growing, SXommunity DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL 45 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 32 soil - binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.) Which may have accumulated from construction activities. 33. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors and reformulated diesel fuel. 34. During smog season (May - October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at* its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 35. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services, and may be further restricted or prohibited should the City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays, pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. 36. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes, which avoid residential areas and requiring that engine brakes not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and be approved by the City Engineer. 37. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound = reduction equipment. 38. Equipment not in use for more than ten minutes should be turned off. 39. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RESO1pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc ®4Qg46 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 33 stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 40. The Developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 41. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune as set forth in manufacturers specifications. 42. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a Building Permit, an as- graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. 43. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for Occupancy: a. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. b. All permanent NPDES Best Management Practices facilities shall be operational. 44. Prior to acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration, the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. b. The Developer shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. c. All surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. Any surety that is in effect three years S:ICommunity DevelopmenfiEveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOQJ.47 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 34 after Zone Clearance approval or issuance of the first building permit shall be increased an amount equal to or greater than the consumers price index (Los Angeles /Long Beach SMSA) for a period since original issuance of the surety and shall be increased in like manner each year thereafter. d. Original "as built" plans will be certified by the Developer's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they must be resubmitted as "as builds" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as builds" plans is required before a final inspection will be scheduled. D. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. All driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 2. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for the review and approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to occupancy. 3. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (6 ") high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 250 feet (250') from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street; the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 4. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method by which this building will be identified by address numbers (Suite Numbers). SXommunity DevelopmedberyonelPC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 35 5. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of hydrants, and show existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development. 6. Fire hydrants, if required, shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 -inch and two (2) 2 -1/2 inch outlet(s). b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 -psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face 24 inches on center. 7. The minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the 1997 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A and adopted Amendments. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. The Applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume at the project. 8. The office building shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system; plans shall be submitted, with fees for plan review and approval, to the Fire District for review. 9. Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted with fees for plan review and approval to the Fire District for plan check. 10. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet #10. The S:ICommunity DevelopmenftberyoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000149 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 36 placement of extinguishers shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire District. 11. All grass or brush exposing any structure(s) to fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance. 12. The Applicant shall obtain and comply with the provisions of VCFD Form #126 Requirements For Construction prior to obtaining a Building Permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. 13. Building plans of all assembly occupancies shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check. E. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Waterworks District No. 1 standard procedures for obtaining domestic water and sewer services for commercial, industrial and public developments within the District. Also, the applicant shall comply with the applicable provisions of the District Rules and Regulations. F. VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: No conditions. G. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 2. All new construction, shall comply with public safety measures as determined by the Moorpark Police Department H. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RESDpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000.15'0 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 37 1. If applicable, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. I. FEES TO BE PAID: 1. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall pay the following fees: a. Current and Future Park System Contribution Fund, in the amount of $.25 per gross square foot of building floor area. b. Art in Public Places Fund, in the amount of $.10 per gross square foot of building floor area. The Applicant may create a public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying the Art in Public Places fee. The artwork must have a value corresponding to the fee and must receive approval from the City Council. C. The Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund, in the amount of $319,940.44, to fund TSM Programs or Clean - fuel Vehicle Programs as determined by the City. 2. Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee - Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall pay: a. A Traffic Mitigation Fee, in the amount of $.50 per gross square foot of building floor area to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. b. The Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee. The AOC fee shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time of payment. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence of the City Manager, the developer will not have to pay the AOC fee. 3. The Applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the developer's pro -rata share of the cost of improvements at the following intersections: S:ICommunity DevelopmentEveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000151 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 38 Los Angeles Avenue /Gabbert Road ($100,000) Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue ($165,000) The actual contribution (pro -rata share shall be based upon the additional traffic added to the intersection. The developer's traffic engineer shall provide the City Engineer a "Fair Share Analysis" of the projects added traffic for calculation of the pro -rata ( "fair share ") amount. J. BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. Use of Asbestos - No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. 2. Unconditional Will -Serve Letter - Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. K. MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS 1. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the construction charge applicable to the proposed project have been made. Applicant shall be required to comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. 2. The project may be located on or near a closed illegal, or abandoned (CIA) solid waste disposal site. The site is identified as S.K. Ranch. If during construction evidence of a waste disposal facility site is encountered, the work shall cease and Environmental Health Division as the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) must be notified. 3. Plan check approval of the proposed food facility must be obtained from the Environmental Health Department, prior to issuance of a building permit. S:1Community DevelopmentberyoneTC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000152 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 39 4. Where the proposed work falls within or affects the State right -of -way such as construction, grading changes to hydraulics run -off, etc., a CalTrans encroachment permit shall be secured and verified with the City Engineer. S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL REMpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 0001S3 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development,Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 40 EXHIBIT B TO APPROVING RESOLUTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000 -02 AIR QUALITY Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the project, the applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee for mitigation of air quality impacts generated by the project. The fee shall be as designated by any City policy or precedent for similar developments. 2. The applicant shall ensure that fixed source contributors to air impacts such as structures, heating and mechanical equipment venting provides the maximum reduction in expulsion of pollutants. 3. The applicant shall submit a dust control plan for the site acceptable to the City concurrent with any preliminary (rough) grading plan. The dust control plan shall address the method and frequency for the reduction of dust nuisances to adjoining property and shall include the periodic sweeping of public streets affected by the earth movement and construction phases of the project. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect a Transportation System Management contribution from the developer to use for clean -air programs. In addition, plans will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Department, City Engineer and Department of Community Development to ensure compliance with these requirements. SXommunity DevelopmedBEveryoneW FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 0VOJL54 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 41 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical soils engineer shall determine the extent and depth of soil removal and re- compaction that is necessary to be shown upon the grading plan. The grading plan shall reflect the areas of questionable stability and provide physical correction consistent with the geotechnical findings on file with the City Of Moorpark Community Development Department. 2. Drainage, grading, compaction, foundation and footing specifications and improvements shall be verified and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the project to address required mitigation of geotechnical issues identified for the site. 3. The recommendations contained within the geotechnical study shall apply to development of the property. 4. All water wells, cisterns or cesspools encountered during grading operations shall be terminated, capped, and or abandoned consistent with best management practices for these uses. The applicants soils engineer shall be responsible to ensure that appropriate actions subject to direction of the local agency having jurisdiction over such use is completed and documentation provided to the Community Development Department. Monitoring: Plans will be reviewed by the City Engineer and Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure compliance with these requirement. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Mitigation Measures: Storm Water Runoff (NPDES) and Flood Control Planning: S:1Community DevelopmentEveryoneTC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000155 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 42 1. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: 1. All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm. 2. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm. 3. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. 4. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. The use of filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices shall not be permitted. C. Under a 50 -year frequency storm collector streets shall have a minimum of one (1) dry travel lane in each direction. d. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public right -of -way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to S:1Community DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000156 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 43 mitigate storm water flows including onsite detention shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way. When used in other locations they shall be designed and constructed with provisions for adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right - of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. g. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 2. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm. b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 3. Prior to the issuance of any [construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryonelPC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc OOOJL57 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 44 4. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 5. The project construction plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval of the City Engineer. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Do not use filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices. 6. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo ". 7. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with 5 or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 9. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. S:ICommunity DevelopmedEveryonelPC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000158 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 45 10. The following requirements shall be adhered to by the permittee: a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. C. Parking lots and drive - through areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - through areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area (s) shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 11. Prior to the issuance of any [construction /grading permit] and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm Water Pollution SXommunity DevelopmedEveryonelPC FINAL RES01pc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 000159 Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 46 Control Plan ( SWPCP) , on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. C. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). e. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. f. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "'Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is S:ICommunity DevelopmentlEveryoneTC FINAL RESOIpc 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc Resolution No. PC- 2001 -411 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty Page 47 available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 12. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and /or building permits, the City Engineer will review grading and improvement plans for compliance with NPDES mitigation measures. SXommunity DevelopmenfiEveryonelPC FINAL RESO* 411 CPD 2000 -02.doc 4304161 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CPD 2000 -2 LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF MOORPARK 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA. 93021 APPLICANT: JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANT AND ACRES REALTY 100 NORTH BARRANCA NO. 200 WEST COVINA, CA 91791 ATTACHMENT � 000162 PREPARED: March 6, 2001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Commercial Planned Development application, CPD 2000 -2, will establish the design and control of a 2,868 square foot Jack in the Box restaurant with drive -thru service and a 17,196 square foot two story retail /office building. A thirty six (36) foot wide drive will be provide at the west side of the property. In addition, the applicant is proposing a fourteen (14 ") one -way access from the carwash located to the east of the property. The architectural style of this project is of a French Colonial design. The building elevations will have several relief features, including wood shutters, reveals, canvas awnings, clay tile roofing, wrought iron accents, and other architectural features with various color combinations to vary the appearance. PROJECT LOCATION: The project is located one property west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue, west of Liberty Bell Road and south of Los Angeles Avenue and Liberty Bell Road, west of the existing car wash, Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -05 -050 PROJECT PROPONENT: The project is being proposed by: Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty 100 North Barranca No. 200 West Covina, Ca 91791 PURPOSE: The purpose of this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is to focus upon environmental impacts of the project identified by the Initial Study. Some impacts may require special mitigation to ensure that impacts to the community or the project area are reduced to a level of insignificance. Some impacts when individually considered may not create significant adverse impacts, but when taken cumulatively may be significant enough to warrant changes in the project design or implementation of mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a level below significant. The information contained in this document is intended to assist decision makers in reaching conclusions concerning the environmental impacts of this project. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty 000163 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 10, 2000 Page No. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES: This MND is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 as amended (Public Resources Code 21000 et.seq.), the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (California Administrative Code 15000 et. seq.), and the City of Moorpark Rules to Implement CEQA (Resolution 92 -872). TECHNICAL STUDIES. The following technical studies were prepared for the project. 1. EIR for Moorpark Land Use and Circulation Element Update and Sphere of Influence Expansion Study (1992). 2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 0005 A, September 29, 1986 and revision dated August 24, 1990. 3. General Plan of the City of Moorpark. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 1987. 5. Moorpark Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning. 6. Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model, Model Description and Validation, June 1994. 7. Technical Appendices for the General Plan Noise Element, November 1994. 8. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 9. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses, 1989. 10. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, 1991. Project Technical Study References 11. Geotechnical Investigation Report dated January 26, 1999 by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. 12. Traffic Analysis dated January 31, 2000 prepared by Thomas S. Montgomery, P.E. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0001G4 August 10, 2000 Page No. 3 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT: NO IMPACT Aesthetics: The project site does not involve scenic resources of the community. Agricultural Resources: The project occurs as an in -fill commercial project in the urban core with no adjacent or abutting agricultural uses, and there are no agricultural uses on the site. Cultural Resources: Professional site investigations and literature reviews show no archeological or cultural resources exist or are likely to exist on the site, and no further work is required. Mineral Resources: No SMARA resources have been identified in association with the project site. Impacts to regional resources will not occur nor will an impact to the capacity of existing resources occur. Population and Housing: The project will be consistent with General Plan build out and land use development for the project area. Recreation: The project will construct on -site facilities to serve the project. Impacts to community parks and recreation can be mitigated through the payment of development fees. Biological resources: No suitable wildlife habitat was identified for this site. EFFECTS FOUND TO HAVE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT: The following was found to have some impact, but the level of impact is less than significant due to requirements to meet mitigation criteria within an existing ordinance or adopted code. EFFECTS FOUND TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATION: The following areas have been found to have impacts upon the project area or community and are considered significant adverse effects unless the mitigation measures provided are implemented and adhered to: Air Quality: The project will contribute incrementally to the reduction in air quality within the region and the community. While the direct impacts of an project may be less than significant on its own, the cumulative effect of this project with other projects known to be in development or pending development create significant impacts for which Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 10, 2000 Page No. 4 mitigation is necessary. Therefore, a condition has been imposed requiring the project to contribute to a Transportation System Management program. Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the project, the applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee for mitigation of air quality impacts generated by the project. The fee shall be as designated by any City policy or precedent for similar developments. 2. The applicant shall ensure that fixed source contributors to air impacts such as structures, heating and mechanical equipment venting provides the maximum reduction in expulsion of pollutants. 3. The applicant shall submit a dust control plan for the site acceptable to the City concurrent with any preliminary (rough) grading plan. The dust control plan shall address the method and frequency for the reduction of dust nuisances to adjoining property and shall include the periodic sweeping of public streets affected by the earth movement and construction phases of the project. Geology and Soils: The project lies within the area of the Arroyo Simi drainage. The area south of Los Angeles Avenue has a history of high ground water, with some locations experiencing water at depths less than 50 feet below the surface. Given the composition of the soils that underlie portions of the drainage area, there may be susceptibility to liquefaction. The project site lies within approximately 2 miles of the West Simi Valley Alquist Priolo Fault Zone located within the Tierra Rejada Valley southerly of the City, parallel to Tierra Rejada Road. This fault zone was designated under Alquist Priolo on May 1, 1999. Mapping and study of the fault was performed by the State Geologist prior to 1997, with preliminary data available in October, 1997. This fault is capable of producing surface rupture. The magnitude of events on this fault could be expected to be between 6.5 — 7.5. Intense ground shaking is likely from events involving the fault within adjacent City areas. A Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation of the site was conducted by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. Several recommendations for grading and stability of the site were included in that report which will be required to be implemented in conjunction with issuance of grading and building permits. Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical soils engineer shall determine the extent and depth of soil removal and re- compaction that is necessary to be shown upon the grading plan. The grading plan shall Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0.00 G(; August 10, 2000 Page No. 5 reflect the areas of questionable stability and provide physical correction consistent with the geotechnical findings on file with the City Of Moorpark Community Development Department. 2. Drainage, grading, compaction, foundation and footing specifications and improvements shall be verified and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the project to address required mitigation of geotechnical issues identified for the site. 3. The recommendations contained within geotechnical study shall apply to development of the property. 4. All water wells, cisterns or cesspools encountered during grading operations shall be terminated, capped, and or abandoned consistent with best management practices for these uses. The applicants soils engineer shall be responsible to ensure that appropriate actions subject to direction of the local agency having jurisdiction over such use is completed and documentation provided to the Community Development Department. Hydrology and Water Quality: The project will induce areas of impervious materials and will require re- routing of on -site water to approved drainage facilities. During and after construction, significant increase in pollution discharge is expected. Best management practices will be needed to ensure that the level of pollutant discharge is within the acceptable limits under the regional water quality control plan. Mitigation Measures: Storm Water Runoff (NPDES) and Flood Control Planning 1. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm; 2. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0001LG7 August 10, 2000 Page No. 6 3. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows 4. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm b. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Do not use filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices. c. Under a 50 -year frequency storm collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction. d. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public right -of -way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows including onsite detention shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right -of -way. When used in other locations they shall be designed and constructed with provisions to provide adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right -of- way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. g. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 2. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. c. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 00068 August 10, 2000 Page No. 7 3. Prior to the issuance of any [construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 5. The project construction plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval of the City Engineer. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Do not use filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices. 6. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo" 7. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with 5 or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 9. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 10. The following requirements shall be included in the CC &R's a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 001169 August 10, 2000 Page No. 8 b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. c. Parking lots and drive - troughs shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - troughs shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Landscaping shall be properly maintained with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. f. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area(s) shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 11. Prior to the issuance of any [construction /grading permit] and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm water Pollution Control Plan ( SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 000170 August 10, 2000 Page No. 9 c. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant/owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant/owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) e. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. f. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will. be attached to the approved grading permit. 12. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. Transportation and Traffic: A Traffic Analysis was prepared by Thomas S. Montgomery date January 31, 2000. In general, the traffic study concluded that the additional traffic proposed as a result of this proposed project would not have any significantly adverse effect on the operation of the street system in the vicinity of the study site. The study indicates the street system in the vicinity of the study site is now operating at acceptable levels of service except at Los Angeles Avenue/Tierra Rejada Road - Gabbert Road during the afternoon peak and Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road during the morning peak. The existing conjestion problems at Los Angeles Avenue and Tierra Rejada Road - Gabbert Road will be eliminated in the near future. The minor congestion problem at Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road during the morning peak would not be significantly changed by the addition of site - generated traffic demands. At total future cumulative traffic demand levels in the year 2010, both the intersections of Lops Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue /Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road are projected to be operating slightly in excess of design capacity during a typical weekday afternoon commuter peak travel period. Site generated traffic demands would not significantly contribute to these future traffic that would be Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION August 10, 2000 007l Page No. 10 generated by the subject mixed -use development not have any significant effect on the existing or future operation of the street system serving the study site. Jack in the Box Restaurant and Acres Realty MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 000172 August 10, 2000 Page No. 11 INITIAL STUDY CHECK LIST ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR s �',"x hwact AESTHETICS a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 1:1 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ❑ which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or E] a Williamson Act contract? c)Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Page 1 701 Less than Less than No Impact Significant SignNicant With Mitigation IncorporaUm FOIJ 07 El X Would the project? a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 1:1 applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality E] violation? c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase ❑ of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant E] concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 1:1 number of people? BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly ❑ or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and wildlife Service? El ❑ x ❑ ❑ x ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ x *�.sa b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ a ❑ v habitat or other sensitive natural community J� identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ 1:1 El v X protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? OOOJL74 Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 2 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any El El ❑ native migratory fish or wildlife species or with /� established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ El D �/ protecting biological resources, such as a tree X preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ �/ significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the El ❑ 1:1 �/ significance of an archaeological resource pursuant X to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ F1 v X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those El El El �/ interred outside of formal cemeteries? X GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project:: a) Expose people or structures to potential ❑ ❑ ❑ �/ substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑ 1:1 v X El on the most recent Aiquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. OOOJL75 Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 3 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ El x c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is El El El v X unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ❑ ❑ v 18- 1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), J� creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting El El El v X the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ \, environment through the routine transport, use, or J� disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset J� and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste El 1:1 El X within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 4 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to J� Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ El v X plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ El El airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for J� people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ v with an adopted emergency response plan or X evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ v loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including X where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste El v X discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 1:1 El �/ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such X that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table levels (e.g. the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ 1:1 El v X site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 000IL i Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 5 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ El [� v site or area, including through the alteration of the J� course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ El 1:1 v X exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ r_1 El v g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area ❑ X as mapped on a Federal Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures El El X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ X j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of El ❑ 1:1 v X loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ v b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or F-1 El 17 v X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any Habitat Conservation Plan [HCP] or r_1 El El v X Natural Community Conservation Plan [NCCPj? MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 6 a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ El mineral resource that would be of value to the region /� and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ❑ ❑ El /� v important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ❑ 1:1 E] �/ levels in excess of standards established in the local X general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive El El r-1 v X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient ❑ El ❑ v noise levels in the project vicinity above levels /� existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in El ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above X levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use 1:1 ❑ ❑ �/ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private E] El 1:1 v X airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 7 POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, ❑ ❑ a �/ either directly (for example, by proposing new homes X and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, El El �/ necessitating the construction of replacement X housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ El v X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse ❑ F� ❑ physical impacts associated with the provision of /� new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? El E X Police protection? El r-1 X Schools? ❑ El X El Parks? El X r-1 Other public facilities? ❑ El X ❑ !1 TIM Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 8 RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing El El ❑ v X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or El ❑ X require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ 1:1 E] v X relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of V service standard established by the county congestion X management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including 1:1 1:1 ❑ X either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ❑ ❑ ❑ v feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous J� intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 1:1 1:1 ❑ v f)Result in adequate parking capacity? Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 9 El El El x f i 401 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ 1:1 El v X supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 1:1 �/ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water El or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of X existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ❑ ❑ �/ water drainage facilities or expansion of existing X facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve E] El 1:1 v X the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ F1 v treatment provider which serves or may serve the X project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ❑ 0 v J� capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 10 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Sigr�cant Signit�� " °'"'�" Impact with Mitigation Incorporation a) Does the project have the potential to degrade El El F1 v X the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ v limited, but cumulatively considerable? X ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects 1:1 ❑ v which will cause substantial adverse effects on J� human beings, either directly or indirectly? 000183 Initial Study for CPD 200 -2 11 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000 -02 TRAFFIC MITIGATION Mitigation Measure: 1. The subject property shall take access to Los Angeles Avenue only at the proposed curb cut near the west property line of the proposed development. Solid double lines shall be required and island chevrons are required to be extended past the westerly property line of the proposed project to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue. Completion of the Shasta Avenue signal construction and widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue shall be completed prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for grading and building permit unless otherwise modified by the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for grading permit and building permit, the Department of Community Development and City Engineer will review plans and require completion of the required improvements. AIR QUALITY Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction of the project, the applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee for mitigation of air quality impacts generated by the project. The fee shall be as designated by any City policy or precedent for similar developments. 2. The applicant shall ensure that fixed source contributors to air impacts such as structures, heating and mechanical equipment venting provides the maximum reduction in expulsion of pollutants. 3. The applicant shall submit a dust control plan for the site acceptable to the City concurrent with any preliminary (rough) grading plan. The dust control plan shall address the method and frequency for the reduction of dust nuisances to adjoining property and shall include the periodic 000384 sweeping of public streets affected by the earth movement and construction phases of the project. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect a Transportation System Management contribution from the developer to use for clean -air programs. In addition, plans will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Department, City Engineer and Department of Community Development to ensure compliance with these requirements. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical soils engineer shall determine the extent and depth of soil removal and re- compaction that is necessary to be shown upon the grading plan. The grading plan shall reflect the areas of questionable stability and provide physical correction consistent with the geotechnical findings on file with the City Of Moorpark Community Development Department. 2. Drainage, grading, compaction, foundation and footing specifications and improvements shall be verified and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the project to address required mitigation of geotechnical issues identified for the site. 3. The recommendations contained within the geotechnical study shall apply to development of the property. 4. All water wells, cisterns or cesspools encountered during grading operations shall be terminated, capped, and or abandoned consistent with best management practices for these uses. The applicants soils engineer shall be responsible to ensure that appropriate actions subject to direction of the local agency having jurisdiction over such use is completed and documentation provided to the Community Development Department. Monitoring: Plans will be reviewed by the City Engineer and Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure compliance with these requirement. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MUG GNP Mitigation Measures: Storm Water Runoff (NPDES) and Flood Control Planning: 1. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: 1. All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm. 2. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm. 3. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. 4. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. The use of filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices shall not be permitted. C. Under a 50 -year frequency storm collector streets shall have a minimum of one (1) dry travel lane in each direction. d. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public right -of -way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows including onsite detention OOO18G shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way. When used in other locations they shall be designed and constructed with provisions for adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right - of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. g. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 2. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm. b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 3. Prior to the issuance of any [construction/ grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 5. The project construction plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development OOOJL87 for the review and approval of the City Engineer. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Do not use filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices. 6. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump — Drains to Arroyo ". 7. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with 5 or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 9. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 10. The following requirements shall be adhered to by the permittee: a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. C. Parking lots and drive - through areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - through areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area(s) shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 11. Prior to the issuance of any [construction/ grading permit] and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan ( SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. C. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). e. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. f. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 12. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and /or building permits, the City Engineer will review grading and improvement plans for compliance with NPDES mitigation measures. OOOJL9fl RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2000 -02 ON THE APPLICATION OF JACK IN THE BOX RESTAURANTS AND ACRES REALTY LOCATED ONE PROPERTY WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE NORTH OF THE ARROYO SIMI, (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 506 -0 -05 -050) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on January 16, 2002, the City Council considered the application filed by Jack - in- the -Box Restaurants and Acres Realty for approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -2 for construction of a 2,868 square foot Jack in the Box Restaurant with drive - through service and a 17,196 square foot two -story retail /office building located one property west of the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue /Leta Yancy Road (Assessor Parcel No. 506 -0 -05 -050; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on January 16, 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and accepted public testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration contained in the staff report, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and testimony received has reached a decision in the matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. findings: The City Council hereby adopts the following CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS: 1. The Mitigated Negative Declaration /Initial Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy, Study and have been S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc020116 - cpd 2000 -02 Jack in the Box. doc 0ll0191 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 2 2. The contents in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program have been considered in the various decisions on the proposed entitlement request. COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth above, it is determined that this application with the attached conditions meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. 3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. 4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character; and SECTION 2. The City Council has received and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13) of the Public Resources Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 210001, the City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for this project have been completed in compliance with CEQA and State Guidelines. 00019:2 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 3 SECTION 4. The City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. SECTION 5. The City Council approves Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -02 subject to the following Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000 -02 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: 1. Permitted Uses - This permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions. All proposed uses of these buildings shall be required to receive a Zone Clearance from the Department of Community Development. The Department may determine that certain uses will require other types of entitlements or environmental assessment. 2. Other Regulations - This development is subject to all applicable regulations of the CPD Zone, and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, Ventura County, City authorities, and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 3. Discontinuance of Use - This Commercial Planned Development Permit shall expire when the uses for which it is granted are abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive days. 4. All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, building colors and materials, sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 5. Use Inauguration - Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after this permit is 000193 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 4 granted this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his /her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one (1) year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 6. Abandonment of Use - Upon expiration of this permit, or failure to inaugurate the use, the premises shall be restored by the permittee to the conditions existing prior to the issuance of the permit, as nearly as practicable. 7. Other Regulations - No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 8. Severability - If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 9. Permittee Defense Costs - The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his /her sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his /her obligation under this condition. 10. Zone Clearance Prior to Building Permit - Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zone Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development. If an Applicant desires, construction plans may be submitted to the Building and Safety Department prior to approval of this ITUMIA Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 5 development permit with a City approved Hold Harmless Agreement. 11. On -site Improvements - No Zone Clearance may be issued for building occupancy until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been provided or the Director of Community Development approves the acceptance of a Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of exterior improvements not related to grading, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full force and effect for one year after occupancy to guarantee that improvements not related to grading are maintained. 12. Zone Clearance Required for Occupancy - Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a Zone Clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Zone Clearance shall be to determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 13. Tenant Occupancy - Prior to the occupancy, applicable proposed uses shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the proposal will comply with all applicable State and local regulations related to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the Applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. 14. Change of Ownership Notice - No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. OOOJL95 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 6 15. Other Uses - If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zone Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the CPD Zone and the terms and conditions of this permit, and if a Minor or Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit is required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. 16. Business Registration - Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. 17. Acceptance of Conditions - The permitteeIs acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and /or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 18. Fish and Game Requirement - Within two days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this Planned Development Permit, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and (b) Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; (c) the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 19. APCD Review of Uses - Prior to occupancy, Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials. Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District is provided. 20. Utilities Assessment District - The Applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground Utility Assessment District. 000196 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 7 21. Loading and Unloading Operations - Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 22. Hours of Operation and Parking Lot Sweeping - That the hours of operation shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Vacuuming of the parking area or the use of any other noise producing equipment shall not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Further requests to extend the hours of operation shall require public notification to property owners within 1,000 feet of the site. 23. Continued Maintenance - The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) days after notification. 24. Noxious Odors - No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 25. Uses and Activities to be Conducted Inside - All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development and consistent with applicable Zoning Code provisions. 26. Graffiti Removal - The Applicant and his /her successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 27. Development of the uses proposed by the application may be phased. However, the office /retail building together with required full wall treatment along the residential property line, site landscaping, parking, circulation and trash /recycling facilities required to serve the office building, shall be included within the first phase of development. No Zone Clearance, building permit, or any other approval needed to construct the restaurant with drive - through shall be issued until a building permit has been issued for the office /retail building. In addition, the office /retail building shall be granted a Certificate of Occupancy prior to or concurrently with the granting of a Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 8 Certificate of Occupancy for the restaurant with drive - through. 28. Case Processing Costs - The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering) , and all City legal service fees prior to Community Development Department or City Engineer's Office initiation of work on Condition Compliance. In addition, the Applicant shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements of the most recently adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits and shall be required to pay all outstanding condition compliance costs prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for building permit. 29. Code Enforcement Costs - The Director of Community Development may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance ". The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). 30. Submittal of Landscape Plans - Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a complete landscape plan (3 sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to Grading Permit approval. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for manufactured slopes over three (3) feet in height. The purpose of the landscaping shall be to control erosion, prevent aesthetic impacts to adjacent property owners, mitigate the visual impacts of all manufactured slopes three (3) feet or more in height, and to replace mature trees lost as a result of construction. The final landscape plans shall also be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. The Applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape inspection. M Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 9 The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. The landscaping shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and shall be installed and receive final inspection prior to Occupancy (final building permit) approval. All landscaping shall have an irrigation system. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscaping and irrigation system were installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. The final landscape plans shall include landscaping specifications, planting details, and design specifications consistent with the following requirements: a. The permittee shall provide for additional enhanced landscaping equal to or greater than the cost of any trees to be removed as determined by the Director of Community Development. Additional trees, which form a canopy, shall be provided to shade parking, driveway areas and other areas as determined by the Director of Community Development to offset the value of any trees removed from the site. The landscape plan shall also incorporate extensive tree landscaping including specimen size trees as approved by the Director of Community Development along Los Angeles Avenue, and as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development. b. Trees shall be added along the south and west property lines adjacent to the approved residential project. The size, type and number of trees to be planted shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. C. The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths within the project limits. d. All plant species utilized shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. e. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 10 screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. f. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. g. Landscaping shall be designed to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. h. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of light at ground level. i. Earthen berms, hedges and /or low walls shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from adjacent streets. j. Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above ground utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and /or a wall. k. A sufficiently dense tree - planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees and /or shrubs shall be designed. Fifty (50) percent (or as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development) of all trees shall be a minimum of 24 inch box size in order to provide screening in a three (3) to five (5) year time period. All other trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon in size. 1. Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping, as identified in the approved landscape plan. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the irrigation system and all landscaping. The Applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the development. M. All perimeter and /or garden walls shall be constructed prior to installation of any sidewalks or concrete slabs. 000200 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 11 n. Any conflicts between light standard locations and tree locations in the parking lot shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. o. If the retail /office building is to be constructed in advance of the restaurant building, the Landscape Plan will include the temporary landscape and irrigation requirements for the vacant pad. Attractive groundcover plantings will be required for the vacant pad and full landscaping will be required for the remainder of the site. 31. Offer of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance - Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for Building Permit, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement to the City for maintaining all landscaping of the site adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. The area referred to shall be all landscaped portions of the required setback area adjacent to the public right -of -way along the street frontages. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the aforementioned area as well as the landscaping within the public right -of -way adjacent to the project. If the City at it's sole discretion determines the landscape maintenance is determined to be unsatisfactory in any of the aforementioned areas, the City may invoke the offer of dedication and assume responsibility at the owner's expense for any or all of the aforementioned areas. The total cost of maintenance for the areas noted above shall be borne by the Applicant. The City may at its sole discretion place the aforementioned areas in a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. The Applicant shall record a covenant to this effect prior to Zone Clearance for Building Permit. The Applicant shall maintain the right to protest the amount and spread of any proposed assessment, but not the formation of, or annexation to a maintenance Assessment District. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for building permit, Developer shall execute a Maintenance Agreement between Caltrans and the City for the landscape maintenance easement area along Los Angeles Avenue, subject to approval of Caltrans and the City, to ensure maintenance of the landscaping within the Caltrans right -of -way. 32. The Building Plans or Plot Plan, and Elevations shall be revised to reflect the following: 000201 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 12 a. The second story windows located along the west elevation of the proposed retail /office building shall have a minimum bottom sill height of six (6) feet or as otherwise as determined by the Director of Community Development to reduce the visibility from the second story offices to the approved residential development. b. If this proposed development precedes development of the residential properties to the south and west of this project, the Developer of this project shall be responsible to construct an eight (8) foot high wall along the west and south property lines, the design of which is subject to the review and approval by the Director of Community Development. The wall shall be constructed prior to commencement of grading. C. A proposed entry from Los Angeles Avenue and the drive - through for the fast -food restaurant shall include decorative pavement such as brick, interlocking pavers, cobblestones or other materials with colors and design consistent with the proposed architecture. The colors and design are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. d. Adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, the Landscape Plan shall incorporate transition planting to appropriately connect to the landscape cross - section of the commercial development to the east and the landscape cross - section of the residential development to the west. The existing sidewalk between the driveway and the east property line shall be relocated within the required landscaped setback so that portions of this frontage shall have landscaping between the curb and sidewalk. The sidewalk width may be reduced to no less than five (5) feet in width where landscaping separates the sidewalk from the curb. The final location and width of the sidewalk shall be determined by the Director of Community Development. The landscaping and sidewalk located within the Caltrans right -of -way will be maintained by the property owner as required by Condition No. 31. e. The transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall or landscaping. Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 13 f. All fences and walls shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan. g. Bicycle racks or storage facilities shall be provided on -site as determined by the Director of Community Development. h. All required loading areas and turning radius shall be depicted on the plot plan. A 45 -foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. i. Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. j. Architecture shall be modified to include, but not be limited to allow for identification signage for the first story units of the office building. k. The stairway as shown on the south elevation of the office building shall be enclosed within the building so as to not be visible from the property line. 33. Access to the project site from Los Angeles Avenue shall be from the single driveway proposed near the west property line, as shown on the approved site plan. Prior to Zone Clearance for grading and building permit for the proposed project, the Developer shall be required to have designed and obtain City and Caltrans approval for the installation of solid double lines in the Los Angeles Avenue median as well as the extension of island chevrons past the westerly property line of the project site to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue. These improvements shall be completed by the Developer prior to Occupancy (final building permit) approval. Completion of the installation of the Shasta Avenue signal and widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue and the project site is also required to be completed prior to approval of Zone Clearance for grading and building permit. The Developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City to complete these improvements in advance of the adjacent Pacific Communities Project. If constructed by this project, reimbursement shall be limited to the pro -rata 000203 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 14 amount determined by the City Engineer with the balance paid by Pacific Communities. If the Shasta Avenue signal and Los Angeles Avenue widening improvements are constructed by Pacific Communities, then this developer shall pay Pacific Communities a pro -rata reimbursement as determined by the City Engineer. This pro -rata reimbursement shall be paid prior to Zone Clearance for grading or building permit. No offset or reimbursement for the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee payment shall be provided for Shasta Avenue signal construction. 34. Skylights - If skylights are used, the material utilized shall be designed so as to minimize the light from the inside of the building to the exterior. Skylights are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. 35. Lighting Plan - For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development with the required deposit for review and approval prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: avoid interference's with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height; provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility and minimize energy consumption. Ornamental lighting fixtures to complement the architectural style of the buildings are required on the building as well as in the parking lot area as determined by the Director of Community Development. Light poles within the parking lot area shall be located on cement bases no higher than six (611) inches above the finished grade. When possible, light poles shall be located within proposed landscaped areas. Low Sodium (yellow) lighting shall not be permitted. All lighting shall be consistent with Section 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance (Lighting Regulations) and the lighting plan shall, at a minimum, include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (201) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (101) foot grid center. Down lighting and accent, landscape and building lighting shall be employed throughout the project. 000204 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 15 b. Maximum overall height of lighting pole fixtures shall be twenty (201) feet. C. Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one (11) foot candle illumination at or beyond property lines. d. Energy efficient lighting devices shall be provided. e. A minimum of one and a maximum of two -foot candle illumination with a 1.5 -foot candle average or as otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. f. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from the street. g. Lighting devices in the parking lot shall be shielded and directed downward to avoid light and glare on neighboring properties. h. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with them unless tamper proof fixtures are approved by the Director of Community Development. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage resistant covers. i. Lighting at all exterior doors shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained two (2') foot candles at ground level. j. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a copy of the lighting plans shall be submitted to the Police Department for review. 36. Location of Property Line Walls - All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 37. Downspouts - No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 38. Roof Mounted Equipment - Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for equipment that cannot be mounted on 000204-4 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 16 the ground and approved to be roof mounted by the Director of Community Development. No roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) may extend above any parapet wall, unless screened on all four sides by view obscuring material that is an intregal design element of the building. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof - mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. All screening shall be tall enough to block all ground level views as well as those from the street and shall be maintained during the life of the permit. Construction material shall match the color and material used in the construction of the buildings. Colors, materials and building appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof, etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible with the existing building and adjacent development and non - reflective in nature. 39. Exterior Ground Level Equipment - Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such as loading docks, cooling towers, generators, etc.) shall be screened from view by a masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development, and located a minimum of twenty (201) feet from any residentially zoned property. The wall shall be constructed of materials and colors consistent with the main building. 40. Building Materials and Colors - All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be those typical of the proposed French Provincial architecture and are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. 41. Noise Generation Sources - All roof - mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources will be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical Engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. Prior to issuance of a 000205 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 17 Zone Clearance for Construction of the Jack -in- the -Box, a noise study shall be required for the menu board speaker box to determine proper placement for avoidance of noise impact to adjacent residential uses. 42. Striping of Spaces - The striping of parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible during the life of the development. 43. Parking Lot Surface - All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall be maintained at all times to insure safe access and use by employees, public agencies and service vehicles. 44. Disposal Areas on Plot Plan - All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be totally covered with a solid roof and screened with a six foot high solid wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be subject to review of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City staff responsible for recycling /solid waste management programs. a. Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate, accessible and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of collection in the area in which the project is located. b. Adequate number of bins or containers shall be provided to allow for the collection and loading of recyclable materials generated by the development. For commercial (general, office, or retail), developments, space allotment for two (2) three cubic yard bins (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.5 ") , or a space allotment for one ( 1) 40 cubic yard bin ( 288" x 120") and one (1) 3 cubic yard bin (84" x 53.5). The intended use for this space is to 0 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 18 hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers (one for refuse, one for recyclables), or one (1) 40 cubic yard bin for refuse and one (1) 3 cubic yard for recyclables. The dimensions provided apply to the space available when the gate is fully open. C. The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be architecturally consistent with the development and compatible with the surrounding area as approved by the Director of Community Development. d. Disposal areas shall be protected from weather conditions, which might render collected recyclable materials unmarketable. e. Driveways or travel aisles shall provide unobstructed access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or other specified clearance required by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. f. A sign, approved by the Director of Community Development, clearly identifying all recycling and solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials accepted therein shall be posted adjacent to all points of access to the recycling areas. g. Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or maintained as unencumbered, according to fire and other applicable building and /or public safety laws. h. Recycling area(s) shall be located so they are convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas. i. Each refuse /recycling enclosure shall be screened with a six (61) foot high solid masonry wall enclosure and six (61) foot high gates and shall be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open position. j. Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access requirements of Title 24 and the American Disabilities Act. 000207 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 19 k. The enclosure shall have a separate indirect pedestrian access way, which does not require doors or gates. 45. The franchised refuse hauler designated to service this location will be determined prior to construction. 46. Other requirements related to refuse disposal and recycling include: a. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of the building. The plan shall include a designated building manager, who is responsible for initiating on- site waste materials recycling programs. This shall include the acquiring of storage bins for the separation of recyclable materials and coordination and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule. b. The building manager or designee will conduct a routine waste management education program on -site to alert employees to any new developments or requirements for solid waste management. This measure shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste Management Department. 47. Enforcement of Vehicle Codes: Prior to Occupancy of either of the buildings, the Applicant shall request that the City Council approve a resolution to enforce vehicle codes on the subject property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7. 48. Sign Program: Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction, a comprehensive sign program for the entire project site shall be submitted to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development consistent with Zoning Code requirements, including but not limited to size restrictions. The sign program shall be designed to provide for a uniform on -site sign arrangement and design. All signs, including, but not limited to monument signs shall be included in the sign program. a. All proposed signs shall conform to the approved sign program, prior to the issuance of a sign permit by the Director of Community Development or his /her designee. 000208 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 20 b. No off -site signs shall be permitted. C. No pylon signs shall be permitted. d. The size of the menu board sign(s) shall not exceed the size criteria established by City Council for Minor Modification No. 4 to CPD 92 -2 (McDonald's). 49. There shall be no access to office building lease areas from the west elevation, except to meet required exiting provisions of the Uniform Building Code. 50. Prior to issuance of Zone Clearance for building permit, the Applicant shall pay the following fees: a. Current and Future Park System Contribution Fund, in the amount of $.25 per gross square foot of building floor area. b. Art in Public Places Fund, in the amount of $.10 per gross square foot of building floor area. The Applicant may create a public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying the Art in Public Places fee. The artwork must have a value corresponding to the fee and must receive approval from the City Council. C. The Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund, in the amount of $319,940.44, to fund TSM Programs or Clean - fuel Vehicle Programs as determined by the City. d. Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee - A Traffic Mitigation Fee, in the amount of $.50 per gross square foot of building floor area to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. e. The Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee. The AOC fee shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time of payment. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence of the City Manager, the Developer will not have to pay the AOC fee. 51. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to occupancy (final building permit), the subdivider, shall will pay a fee to 000209 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 21 the City Clerk's Department to scan building permit file, landscape, public improvement, site plans and other plans as determined by the City into the City's electronic imaging system. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: 52. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements. 53. Concurrent with submittal of the grading plan an Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. 54. Requests for grading permits will be granted in accordance with the approved CPD 2000 -2, as required by these conditions and local ordinance. 55. CPD 2000 -2 does not indicate cut or fill quantities. Staff will be allowed to approve an import or export of 10,000 cubic yards of soil. Any additional import more than 10,000 cubic yards shall require Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. 56. The Developer shall indicate in writing to the City Engineer the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No.3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 57. Temporary irrigation, hydro seeding or equal measures acceptable to the City Engineer for erosion and dust control shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to temporary grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition 0002:.0 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 22 for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days or the beginning of the rainy season whichever comes first. 58. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties will not be allowed without mitigation. 59. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Geotechnical Engineering report certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The geotechnical engineering report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The Developer shall also provide a report that discusses the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Note: Review of the geotechnical engineering report(s), by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, shall be required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative fee for this review. 60. All recommendations included in the approved geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the Developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soils report(s). 61. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, 00d2:11 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 23 collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: 1) All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm; 2) All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm; 3) All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; and 4) All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices (BMP's) Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices are not permitted. C. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public right -of -way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows including on -site detention shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way. When used in other locations they shall be designed and constructed with provisions for adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right - of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 000212 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 24 f. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 62. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm; and C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 63. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo." 64. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with five (5) or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 65. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 66. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or 000213 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 25 storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 67. The following requirements shall be adhered to by the permittee: a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. C. Parking lots and drive - through areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - through areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area(s) shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 68. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm Water Pollution 000214 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 26 Control Plan ( SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. C. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). e. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 69. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 70. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans as may be 000215 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 27 required for Los Angeles Avenue prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to the California Department of Transportation Standards (most recent version). The plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development and Caltrans. 71. The street right -of -way improvements shall include adequate pavement for vehicle turnouts into the project, controlled access exiting the project, in addition to concrete curb and gutter, parkways, new streetlights, and signing, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer, the Director of Community Development and Caltrans. The Developer shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 72. The Applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the Developer's pro -rata share of the cost of improvements at the following intersections: Los Angeles Avenue /Gabbert Road Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue Los Angeles Avenue /Shasta Avenue The actual contribution (pro -rata share shall be based upon the additional traffic added to the intersection. The Developer's traffic engineer shall provide the City Engineer a "Fair Share Analysis" of the projects added traffic for calculation of the pro -rata ( "fair share ") amount. 73. Street lights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. 74. The final design and location of all barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping is subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 75. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771, the street improvement plans shall provide for a surveyors 000216 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 28 statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. 76. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements will be acquired by the Developer at his /her expense. 77. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. The plans shall be required with the site grading plans for the review by, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 78. Utilities, facilities and services shall be extended and /or constructed in conjunction with any approved phased development by the Developer as follows: Water & Sewer a. The Developer will be responsible for the construction of all on -site and off -site sanitary sewer facilities to serve the project. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 to construct the improvements and the system will be dedicated to Waterworks District No. 1 for maintenance. b. Prior to Zone Clearance, the City, Calleguas Municipal Waterworks District and Waterworks District No. 1 shall approve final plans for water distribution. Either the Developer shall construct the required distribution facilities or enter into an agreement with the Calleguas Municipal Water District and /or Waterworks District No. 1 stating when and how facilities will be funded and constructed. The system will be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the proposed land uses and applicable City, Calleguas and Waterworks District No. 1 standards. 79. All utilities shall be placed underground. 80. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for grading, the Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements which revert to the City (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 29 require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. The surety shall include provisions for all site improvements within the development and other off -site improvements required by the conditions as described herein. 81. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 15 to April 15 subject to installation of debris and erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 15th and April 15th. a. All trucks that will haul off -site shall comply wit h 23114, with special 231144(b)(2)(F), (e)(2) regarding the prevention o f public streets and roads. excavated or graded material State Vehicle Code Section attention to Section and (e)(4) as amended, such material spilling onto b. On -site vehicle speeds shall not exceed 15 miles per hour. 82. Prior to any work being conducted within the State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. 83. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations, dust emissions should be controlled by regular watering with reclaimed water, if available, paving construction roads and other dust prevention measures. The Developer shall submit a dust control plan, acceptable to the city, concurrently with submittal of the grading plan. This plan shall include, but is not be limited to the following measures: a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The Dust Control Plan shall indicate the number of water trucks, which will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. 0002 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 30 b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. c. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Minimize the area disturbed at any one time by clearing, grading, earth moving and excavation so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. e. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. f. Face masks shall be used by all employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust, which may contain the fungus that causes San Joaquin Valley Fever. g. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 84. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast - growing, soil- binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.) Which may have accumulated from construction activities. 85. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors and reformulated diesel fuel. 00002019 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 31 86. During smog season (May- October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 87. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services, and may be further restricted or prohibited should the City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays, pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. 88. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes, which avoid residential areas and requiring that engine brakes not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and be approved by the City Engineer. 89. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. 90. Equipment not in use for more than ten minutes should be turned off. 91. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 92. The Developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 32 93. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune as set forth in manufacturers specifications. 94. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for a Building Permit, an as- graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. 95. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for Occupancy: a. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. b. All permanent NPDES Best Management Practices facilities shall be operational. 96. Prior to acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration, the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. b. The Developer shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. C. All surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. Any surety that is in effect three years after Zone Clearance approval or issuance of the first building permit shall be increased an amount equal to or greater than the consumers price index (Los Angeles /Long Beach SMSA) for a period since original issuance of the surety and shall be increased in like manner each year thereafter. d. Original "as built" plans will be certified by the Developer's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they must be resubmitted as "as builds" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block 000221 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 33 on each sheet. Submission of "as builds" plans is required before a final inspection will be scheduled. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 97. All driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (1316 "). 98. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for the review and approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to occupancy. 99. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (6 ") high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 250 feet (2501) from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street; the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 100. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method by which this building will be identified by address numbers (Suite Numbers). 101. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of hydrants, and show existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development. 102. Fire hydrants, if required, shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 -inch and two (2) 2 -1/2 inch outlet(s). b. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. � � 7 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 34 c. Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face 24 inches on center. 103. The minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the 1997 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A and adopted Amendments. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. The Applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume at the project. 104. The office building shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system; plans shall be submitted, with fees for plan review and approval, to the Fire District for review. 105. Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted with fees for plan review and approval to the Fire District for plan check. 106. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire District. 107. All grass or brush exposing any structure(s) to fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance. 108. The Applicant shall obtain and comply with the provisions of VCFD Form #126, Requirements for Construction, prior to obtaining a Building Permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. 109. Building plans of all assembly occupancies shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 110. The applicant shall comply with the Waterworks District No. 1 standard procedures for obtaining domestic water and sewer services for commercial, industrial and public developments within the District. Also, the applicant shall comply with 000223 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 35 the applicable provisions of the District Rules and Regulations. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 111. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 112. All new construction, shall comply with public safety measures as determined by the Moorpark Police Department. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITION: 113. If applicable, prior to the the Applicant shall pay all the Moorpark Unified School BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: issuance of a Building Permit, school assessment fees levied by District. 114. Use of Asbestos - No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. 115. Unconditional Will -Serve Letter - Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 116. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the construction charge applicable to the proposed project have been made. Applicant shall be required to comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS: 117. The project may be located on or near a closed illegal, or abandoned (CIA) solid waste disposal site. The site is identified as S.K. Ranch. If during construction evidence of a waste disposal facility site is encountered, the work shall cease and Environmental Health Division as the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) must be notified. 000224 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 36 118. Plan check approval of the proposed food facility must be obtained from the Environmental Health Department, prior to issuance of a building permit. ®0082025 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 37 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2000 -02 TRAFFIC MITIGATION Mitigation Measure: 1. Access to the project site from Los Angeles Avenue shall be from the single driveway proposed near the west property line, as shown on the approved site plan. Prior to Zone Clearance for grading and building permit for the proposed project, the Developer shall be required to have designed and obtain City and Caltrans approval for the installation of solid double lines in the Los Angeles Avenue median as well as the extension of island chevrons past the westerly property line of the project site to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue. These improvements shall be completed by the Developer prior to Occupancy (final building permit) approval. Completion of the installation of the Shasta Avenue signal and widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue and the project site is also required to be completed prior to approval of Zone Clearance for grading and building permit. The Developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City to complete these improvements in advance of the adjacent Pacific Communities Project. If constructed by this project, reimbursement shall be limited to the pro -rata amount determined by the City Engineer with the balance paid by Pacific Communities. If the Shasta Avenue signal and Los Angeles Avenue widening improvements are constructed by Pacific Communities, then this developer shall pay Pacific Communities a pro -rata reimbursement as determined by the City Engineer. This pro -rata reimbursement shall be paid prior to Zone Clearance for grading or building permit. No offset or reimbursement for the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee payment shall be provided for Shasta Avenue signal construction. 000226 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 38 Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for grading permit and building permit, the Department of Community Development and City Engineer will review plans and verify approval of the design for the installation of solid double lines in the Los Angeles Avenue median as well as the extension of island chevrons past the westerly property line of the project site to prohibit left -turn movements directly into the site from westbound Los Angeles Avenue. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for grading permit and building permit, the Department of Community Development and City Engineer will require completion of the installation of the Shasta Avenue signal and widening along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Shasta Avenue and the project site. AIR QUALITY Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance for construction of the project, the applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee for mitigation of air quality impacts generated by the project. The fee shall be as designated by any City policy or precedent for similar developments. 2. The applicant shall ensure that fixed source contributors to air impacts such as structures, heating and mechanical equipment venting provides the maximum reduction in expulsion of pollutants. 3. The applicant shall submit a dust control plan for the site acceptable to the City concurrent with any preliminary (rough) grading plan. The dust control plan shall address the method and frequency for the reduction of dust nuisances to adjoining property and shall include the periodic sweeping of public streets affected by the earth movement and construction phases of the project. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance, the Department of Community Development will collect a Transportation System Management contribution from the Developer to use for clean -air programs. In addition, plans will be reviewed by the Building 00022'7 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 39 and Safety Department, City Engineer and Department of Community Development to ensure compliance with these requirements. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measures: 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical soils engineer shall determine the extent and depth of soil removal and re- compaction that is necessary to be shown upon the grading plan. The grading plan shall reflect the areas of questionable stability and provide physical correction consistent with the geotechnical findings on file with the City Of Moorpark Community Development Department. 2. Drainage, grading, compaction, foundation and footing specifications and improvements shall be verified and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the project to address required mitigation of geotechnical issues identified for the site. 3. The recommendations contained within the geotechnical study shall apply to development of the property. 4. All water wells, cisterns or cesspools encountered during grading operations shall be terminated, capped, and or abandoned consistent with best management practices for these uses. The applicants soils engineer shall be responsible to ensure that appropriate actions subject to direction of the local agency having jurisdiction over such use is completed and documentation provided to the Community Development Department. Monitoring: Plans will be reviewed by the City Engineer and Building and Safety Department prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure compliance with these requirement. 000228 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 40 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Mitigation Measures: Storm Water Runoff (NPDES) and Flood Control Planning: 1. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions will be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: 1. All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm. 2. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm. 3. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. 4. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. The use of filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices shall not be permitted. C. Under a 50 -year frequency storm collector streets shall have a minimum of one (1) dry travel lane in each direction. 000229 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 41 d. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased development. All drainage mitigate storm water flows shall be provided to the Engineer. or the Public right -of -way :)r concentrated by this measures necessary to including onsite detention satisfaction of the City e. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way. When used in other locations they shall be designed and constructed with provisions for adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. All flows from longitudinal gutters, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain shall be extended beyond the public right - of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owner unless otherwise approved by the City Council. g. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. Developer shall demonstrate downstream facilities will not be adversely impacted. 2. The Developer shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm. b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 3. Prior to the issuance of any [construction/ grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm water 000230 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 42 Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 5. The project construction plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval of the City Engineer. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Do not use filters, separators, clarifiers or similar devices. 6. All on -site storm drain inlets, whether newly constructed or existing, shall be labeled "Don't Dump — Drains to Arroyo ". 7. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with 5 or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices, such as oil /water separators, sand filters, landscaped areas for infiltration, basins or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 9. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 00023 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 43 10. The following requirements shall be adhered to by the permittee: a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 15 (the rainy season) and once in January. Additional cleaning may be required by the City Engineer. C. Parking lots and drive - through areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - through areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area(s) shall be covered. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. Area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to either the storm drain system or the sanitary sewer. However, the enclosure shall be designed and constructed with provision for future connection to the sanitary sewer. 11. Prior to the issuance of any [construction/ grading permit] and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the owner shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 000232 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in Page 44 the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) a. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. b. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. C. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." d. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CAS004002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). e. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. f. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites ". This handout is available at the City Engineer's office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 12. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm 000233 Resolution No. 2002 - CPD 2000 -02 (Jack in the Box Restaurants and Acres Realty) Page 45 water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and /or building permits, the City Engineer will review grading and improvement plans for compliance with NPDES mitigation measures. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk 0002 ,34 ITEM '7. CT-' MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst Date: January 2, 2002 (CC Meeting of January 16, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER DEDICATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS AUTHORIZED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1998 ($12,000) TO ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR CALHOME MOBILEHOME REHABILITATION BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, Council directed staff to apply for CalHome funds in the amount of four hundred twenty thousand dollars ($420,000) for mobilehome replacement or rehabilitation loans. Upon the State's approval of the City's application, Council approved revisions to the City's existing guidelines for mobilehome rehabilitation loans. These revisions made the City's mobilehome rehabilitation guidelines consistent with CalHome guidelines and both funding sources could be used for mobilehome rehabilitation loans, as needed. As the CalHome loans are repaid, the repaid funds may be used in any eligible program in the City for housing rehabilitation or down payment assistance. DISCUSSION Typical services needed for each rehabilitation project include appraisal; loan processing; preparation of the work write -up and oversight of the bid process; preparation of loan documents and construction contract(s); construction management; fund disbursement; and various reporting requirements. A consultant with experience administering this program has been located and estimates these costs to be approximately two thousand dollars ($2,000) per transaction. This amount is consistent with HUD guidelines. Some of the costs of each loan transaction can be 900235 Honorable City Council Date 01/09/02 Page 2 recovered by the five per cent (5 %) service delivery fee provided by the CalHome Program. Some remaining costs may be paid by the borrower. However, these remaining costs may still be a high cost to be borne by low income mobilehome owners. Residents of Moorpark who have utilized the mobilehome rehabilitation program and the conventional housing rehabilitation program have paid approximately $750 in transaction costs. The cost of City staff time has not been recaptured. If costs to new mobilehome rehabilitation borrowers were capped at approximately the same level that previous borrowers have paid, another funding source would be needed. In order to fund as many eligible loans as possible in the two - year period of this program, consulting services have been sought for its efficient administration. The loan costs and charges for consulting services to set up the administration of this program and create program documents, including monitoring and re -use plans, are an eligible use of CDBG funds. RECOMMENDATIONS (ROLL CALL VOTE) 1. Open public hearing, accept public testimony, and close public hearing. 2. Authorize $12,000 in CDBG Affordable Housing funds to be designated for CalHome mobilehome rehabilitation program set -up and service delivery fees for approximately 12 mobilehome rehabilitation loans. 3. Limit each borrower's share of the transaction costs of a mobilehome rehabilitation loan to the costs of appraisal and loan processing, not to exceed $750.00. 4. Stipulate that loan costs for each CalHome mobilehome rehabilitation loan transaction are to be paid by the CalHome service delivery fee (5% of loan amount); borrower, subject to a maximum amount of $750; and CDBG funds. 0002.ib ITEM /O- A, AGENDA REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Walter Brown, City Engineer DATE: January 4, 2002 (Council Meeting 1- 16 -02) . 1 1. _, i �yorz HU(Qt6--a AaB- ) SUBJECT: Consider Approval of the Re- design of the Retaining Walls for the Los Angeles East Improvement Project [Project 8012] BACKGROUND On June 2, 1999, the City Council considered a number of alternative design concepts for the required retaining walls. The option selected was a "Keystone" type concrete block (see Exhibits 1 - A and B). On July 21, 1999, the City Council revised that design by directing that "tiered" landscaping be incorporated into the wall design. MWMARY The use of reinforced concrete soil nailed simulated rock cut walls in lieu of Keystone walls offers advantages in: • Appearance, shown by comparing exhibits 1, 3 and 4. • Cost, saving approximately $308,000 as shown in the tables in the `Discussion' section of this report. • Ease of construction and reduced disturbance of adjacent properties. The recommendation of this change to the project was initiated as a result of a value and constructability analysis of the retaining walls. The analysis required the plans to be brought to a high level of detail. DISCUSSION The retaining walls required for the subject project range in height from four feet (4') to twenty -seven feet (27'). The earth behind most of the walls will continue to slope upward from the top of the L— A— East5 —wa112 000238 L A East Project: Retaining Wall Re- Design January 4, 2002 Page 2 walls. The optimal design for the retaining walls should provide attractive appearance and stable slopes at the least cost and not disturb existing buildings or require extensive removal and re- compaction of the hillside. During the design process, as the level of detail of the Los Angeles Avenue East construction plans increased, the need to provide shoring to protect one of the adjacent residences during construction of a retaining wall fronting became apparent. The shoring was needed to support the building during the construction of both Keystone and conventional type retaining walls. As a matter of cost control design alternatives that would eliminate the need for shoring were considered. The soil nailing, some times called tie -back, option was originally considered for only the support of the residence. When the costs to mobilize the equipment and tradesmen used for soil nailing were considered and the cost - effectiveness of reinforced concrete soil nailed retaining walls were calculated it became evident that concrete soil nailed retaining walls are a viable choice for this project. Alternative wall designs and their ability to achieve the design objectives are discussed in the following sections. A. Keystone Wall Design Examples of the Keystone retaining wall system are shown on Exhibits 1 - A and B. This type of retaining wall relies on the installation of patented concrete blocks retained in place by 18" horizontal layers of compacted soil and "construction fabric ". The Keystone wall concrete blocks use layers of construction fabric to anchor the wall to the retained earth. The installation of the construction fabric requires the removal of earth to create a 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope to assure the stability of the slope during construction. Additionally the sloped earthen face needs to be excavated back from the wall approximately 8 feet for each 10 feet of wall height to allow for the installation of the construction fabric. The above described removal and re- compaction of the retained slope will result in more disturbance to the existing hillside than is necessary for the construction of vertical reinforced concrete retaining walls or soil nailed walls. The excavation will require temporary shoring of some existing buildings (see Exhibits 2 - A and B). The shoring is expensive and carries some risk of damage, or claims of damage, to the shored buildings. The estimated construction cost for the Keystone retaining walls, including excavation, landscaping, right -of -way and other costs directly attributable to the Keystone wall, is $1,540,000. The costs associated with shoring and repairing potential damage to the buildings affected by the installation are not included in the estimated amount. A summary of costs follows: L_A_East5_wa112 0 02 439 L A East Project: Retaining Wall Re- Design January 4, 2002 Page 3 A V=im Ctnn= Wall Wall: 2,870 x 13.00 = 37,310 SF @ $17.00 /SF = $634,270 x Excavation: 2,870 x 15.59 = 44, 743 C @ $5.00 /CY = $223,717 x Leveling Pad 2,870 x 0.14 = 399 C @ $12.50 /CY = $4,983 x Backfill: 2,870 x 11.13 = 31,943 CY @ $5.00 /CY = $159,716 x Right-of-Way 2,870 x 10.90 = 31, 283 SF @ $7.50 /SF = $234,623 x Landscape 2,870 x 21.80 = 62, 566 SF @ $4.44 /SF = $277,793 6.59% Desi n $0 x 6.29% _ $0 TOTAL: _ $1,181,606= $31.67/S.F TOTAL: $1,535,100= $41.14 /S.F. B. Reinforced Concrete Cantilevered Retaininq Wall Reinforced concrete cantilevered retaining walls use the weight of the wall and the soil over the footing of the wall to counter balance the forces of the soil retained by the wall. The installation of the reinforced concrete wall requires the removal of earth to create a 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope to assure the stability of the slope during construction (see Exhibits 2 - A and C) . This wall type would not include the cascading or tiered wall landscaping which was to be incorporated into the Keystone wall. The wall would have a flat surface with no decorative features. The estimated construction cost for "standard" reinforced concrete retaining walls, including excavation, landscaping, right -of -way and other costs directly attributable to the retaining wall for this project is $ $1,180,000. A summary of costs follows: R r."+- il=c=c Rctaininn Wall Concrete: 2,870 x27.8/27= 2,955CY @$229.00/CY = $676,703 Rebar: 2,870 x 67.00 =192, 290 LB@ $0.53 /LB= $101,914 Excavation: 2,870 x 10.77 = 30,910CY@ $5.00 /CY = $154,550 Backfill: 2,870 x 5.67 = 16,273CY@ $5.00 /CY = $81,365 Right-of-Way 2,870 x 2.00 = 5,740SF@ $7.50 /SF= $43,050 Landscape 2,870 x 4.00 = 11,480SF@ $4.44 /SF= $50,971 Design $1, 108,552x 6.59% _ $73,054 TOTAL: _ $1,181,606= $31.67/S.F C. Reinforced Concrete Cantilevered Retaining Wall with Simulated Quarried Rock Facing There is no structural difference between the "standard" reinforced concrete retaining walls and the reinforced concrete L A East5 wa112 000 240 L A East Project: Retaining Wall Re- Design January 4, 2002 Page 4 cantilevered retaining wall with simulated quarried rock facing. The installation of this wall requires the removal of earth to create a 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope to assure the stability of the slope during construction (see Exhibits 2 - A and C) . The thickness of the wall is increased by the depth of the pattern. The simulation of quarried rock is achieved by the use of rubber or Styrofoam lined forms that mold the concrete into the shape of the selected pattern. After the concrete has set, it is etched and stained with a weather resistant dye. Several patterns of stonework are available. This wall type would not include the cascading or tiered wall landscaping which was to be incorporated into the Keystone wall. Some examples of aesthetic wall treatments that can be applied are attached as Exhibits 3 - A and B. The surface treatment recommended by staff is Sedona. The addition of a simulated quarried rock facing to a standard cantilever retaining wall will increase the cost of the wall by approximately $13.00 per square foot of wall surface. The estimated construction cost for reinforced concrete retaining walls with simulated quarried rock facing, including excavation, landscaping, right -of -way and other costs directly attributable to the retaining wall for this project is $1,580,000. A summary of costs follows: r rmn+ -i 1 avar Tlannrati va Ratai ni nff Wal 1 Concrete: 2,870 x 27 . 8/27 = 2, 955 CY @ $229.00 /CY= $676,703 Rebar: 2,870 x 67.00 = 192,290LB@ $0.53 /LB= $101,914 Stone -Crete Decorative Finish 2,870 x 13.00 = 37,310SF@ $10.00 /SF= $373,100 Excavation: 2,870 x 10.77 = 30, 910CY@ $5.00 /CY = $154,550 Backfill: 2,870 x 5.67 = 16,273CY@ $5.00 /CY = $81,365 Right-of-Way 2,870 x 2.00 = 5, 740 SF@ $7.50 /SF= $43,050 Landscape 2,870 x 4.00 = 11, 480 SF@ $4.44 /SF= $50,971 Design $1, 481,652x 6.29% _ $93,196 TOTAL: _ $1,574,848 = $42.21/S.F D. Reinforced Concrete Soil Nailed Simulated Rock Cut Wall The reinforced concrete soil nailed simulated rock cut wall is actually a vertical concrete slab attached to the soil and retained with corrosion resistant steel anchors. The soil nails are installed as the soil is excavated. This allows the wall to be constructed while minimizing the disturbance of the area behind the wall. The anchors are inserted into drilled holes which are then pressure grouted. The design is widely used in Europe and has seen increased use in the United States over the L_A— East5_wa112 000241L L A East Project: Retaining Wall Re- Design January 4, 2002 Page 5 past few years. The simulation of a rock cut is achieved by hand sculpting of the concrete into realistic native rock shapes. The concrete can be colored with integral color and /or, after the concrete has set, etched and stained with a weather resistant dye. An example of a soil nailed simulated rock cut wall is located along the westerly side of I -405 adjacent to the Getty Museum. This wall is shown on Exhibits 4 - A and B. This is the surface treatment recommended by staff. This wall type would not include the cascading or tiered wall landscaping which was to be incorporated into the Keystone wall, however planting pockets can be incorporated into the wall to achieve a similar effect. The estimated construction cost for reinforced concrete soil nailed simulated rock cut wall, including excavation, landscaping, right -of -way and other costs directly attributable to the retaining wall for this project is $1,290,000. A summary of costs follows: n Rnil Nail Gniilntnd R,-taininQ Wall F. Re- Design Each of the wall types mentioned in items A through D is an individual design. The Keystone wall design is presently completed. Each of the wall types can be constructed within the area of the easement documents that are already prepared. The negotiations for acquisition of the easements may warrant the cost of preparation of new easements documents. Revisions to the wall easements, slope easements and construction easements along the north side of the street would require preparation of 47 000242 L A East5 wa112 2, 870 x 13. 00 = 37, 310 SF @ $32. 00 /CY = $1, 193, 920 Wall - Includes Tie- back bars (Supply, Drill, Grout, Test & Tension), Reinforcing, 8" Shot - Crete, Backdrain & Sculpting Face Excavation: 2,870 x 0.06 = 178CY@ $10.50 /CY = $1,868 Backfill: 2,870 x 0.06 = 178CY@ $3.50 /CY = $623 Right-of-Way 2,870 x 0.67 = 1, 923 SF@ $7.50 /SF = $14,422 Landscape 2,870 x 0.00 = 0SF@ $4.44 /SF = $0 Design $1,210,833 x 6.43% _ $77,857 TOTAL: _ $1,288,689= $34.54/S.F. F. Re- Design Each of the wall types mentioned in items A through D is an individual design. The Keystone wall design is presently completed. Each of the wall types can be constructed within the area of the easement documents that are already prepared. The negotiations for acquisition of the easements may warrant the cost of preparation of new easements documents. Revisions to the wall easements, slope easements and construction easements along the north side of the street would require preparation of 47 000242 L A East5 wa112 L A East Project: Retaining Wall Re- Design January 4, 2002 Page 6 descriptions and plat maps. The cost to prepare the descriptions and plat maps would be $37,600. Redesign efforts include the required changes to the plans. The redesign efforts are included in the estimated cost of the walls. The costs of the redesign efforts are based on a percentage of the estimated construction costs. G. Fiscal Impact 1. Wall Selection: A summary of the cost differentials of the retaining wall designs follows: Wall SE?1PCtion Cost Differentials Type of Wall Estimated Cost Change from To Date Future Total Cost Keystone Wall Keystone Wall $1,597,035 $0 Cantilever Retaining $1,181,606 - $415,429 Wall Cantilever Decorative $1,574,848 - $22,186 Retaining Wall (Adjusted for 2003 Construction Date & Soil Nail Sculpted $1,288,689 - $308,345 Retaining Wall 2. Current Total Project Cost Summary: A summary of the total estimated project costs [2003 construction costs] is as follows: Current Total Project Cost Summary Work Description Costs To Date Future Total Design $268,362 78,000 346,362 Right -of -Way - Preliminary Estimate, $0 1,500,000 1,500,000 No Appraisal Data Available Construction Using Soil Nail Wall (Adjusted for 2003 Construction Date & 0 3,460,000 3,460,000 with 15% Contingency) Construction Administration & 0 519,000 519,000 Inspection (15% of Construction Cost) Totals $268,362 $5,557,000 $5,825,362 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the redesign of the retaining walls to provide for the construction of reinforced concrete soil nailed simulated rock cut wall. Use existing easement documents and defer preparation of new easement documents unless right -of -way costs exceed the cost of their preparation. L A East5 wa112 0002 Keystone Wall Exhibit 1 -A Keystone Wall Exhibit 1 -B Exhibit 2 -A Nll Nj off. It u TS �Ilk YX __tzt! u � 000246 Exhibit 2 -B w 6.5' z w 4.5, W U X SEE WALL AND `- HANDRAIL CETAIL 2% z orf ON SHEET 2 L J •y SEE DRAINAGE— PLANS i GEO —GRID PER Q, j KEYSTONE 00 WALL PLANS ALTERNATE 1 ECTION 2--2 N.T.S. LOT 1 1 5 00024'7 z Ln X LA-1 Lj a-, L. 60 Exhibit 2-C 6.5' ALTERNATE 2 SECTION 2-2 N.T.S. LOT 115 SEE WALL AND HANDRAIL DETAIL ON SHEET 2 M 000243 Cast Concrete Detail Exhibit 3 -A Sedona Pattern � yig g , A � r mill - Ni Sculpted Soil Nail Wall Exhibit 4 -A Wall along I -405 at the Getty Center Sculpted Soil Nail Wall Exhibit 4 -B Close -up of wall along I -405 at the Getty Center �-cTC• �r 3 ?flirt °'F";1 ?1. ?,�, �':',T ..- s�r'.'e'7 .1 ,A C- .�- �- �r -� >�r ITEM MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California December 20, 2001 An Adjourned Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on December 20, 2001, in the Community Center Conference Room of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Mayor Hunter announced that the adjourned meeting was called to discuss Item 9.A. which was continued from the December 19, 2001, regular meeting with the public hearing closed, due to lack of a voting quorum, and one closed session item. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter. Absent: Councilmember Millhouse. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: C. Consider the Status of Interim Prohibition of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities and Extension of Ordinance No. 272 and Amendment of Ordinance No. 273, Enacting a Moratorium on the Issuance of Permits for Construction or Placement of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing; and 2) Adopt Ordinance No. 275, extending Ordinance No. 272 and amending Ordinance No. 273, enacting a moratorium on the issuance of permits for construction or placement of Wireless Communications Facilities in the City and declaring the urgency thereof. (4/5's vote required for adoption of ordinance) Continued from December 19, 2001, with Public Hearing Closed. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation with a revised extension date for the moratorium from April 14, 2002, to April 18, 2002. The motion carried by voice vote of 4 -0, Councilmember Millhouse absent. 0002!k3 Minutes of City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 December 20, 2001 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to introduce Ordinance 275 for first reading and to waive full reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by voice vote of 4 -0, Councilmember Millhouse absent. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 275. The motion carried by voice vote of 4 -0, Councilmember Millhouse absent. 13. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny announced that the City Council would be going into closed session for discussion of Item 13.F. on the agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion of Item 13.F. on the agenda. The motion carried by voice vote of 4 -0, Councilmember Millhouse absent. The time was 6:08 p.m. F. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative Services, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, and Director of Public Works. Present in closed session were Mayor Hunter, Councilmember Mikos, Councilmember Harper, and Councilmember Wozniak; Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk. The Council reconvened into open session at 6:12 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that there was no action to report. 14. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 6:12 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk 000254 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California January 9, 2002 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on January 9, 2002, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Rejection of Claim: Robyn Tholander. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Mayor Hunter seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 5. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 5:36 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk 000255 ITEM ) '_ E3 � CITY OFMOORPARK TV 0c (' "j)[?jTT*�T?K„ ! - I 1p - P cC� WARRANT REGISTER R' f ACr)": r c FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 16, SEQUENCE AMOUNT From To MANUAL 108095 - 108096 $ 28,325.25 WARRANTS VOIDED 106042 & 107905 & $ (841.50) WARRANT 107910 (Pentamation additional remitance copy) 107983 & 108084 --------- - - - - -- $ 27,483.75 PAYROLL LIABILITY 107960 - 107968 & $ 11,527.02 WARRANTS 108085 - 108094 $ 16,632.18 REGULAR 107969 - 108083 & $ 748,940.11 WARRANTS 108100 - 108156 & $ 11,499.02 108157 - 108183 $ 269,785.55 TOTAL $ 1,085,867.63 000256 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 100076307610 9244 EASY STREET ARENA N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 AP121201 1/3/02 CAMP MPK TRIP 20 1/3/02 TRIP 12/12/01 107905 V 0.00 TOTAL WINTER CAMP CHECK AMT TOTAL WINTER CAMP NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE d O C N�,//I UI RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 13:12:41 PAGE 1 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 11/07/01 - 210.00 0.00 - 210.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 210.00 - 210.00 - 210.00 - 210.00 - 210.00 - 210.00 12/19/01 ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK AMT FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR N CONTROL DESCRIPTION 100076300000 9103 GALL'S INC 20 36293701 AP121201 NEW AVCP BIN TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE O RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 09:26:05 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 1 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE N 12/19/01 1101 0.00 11/14/01 - 354.96 20 36293701 12/12/01 107910 V 0.00 0.00 - 354.96 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 354.96 - 354.96 - 354.96 - 354.96 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 4003 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 400378000000 9505 GALL'S INC N 12/19/01 1101 0.00 11/16/01 - 161.54 AP121201 PARK TRUCKS LIGHT SW 20 55298917 12/12/01 107910 V 0.00 0.00 - 161.54 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT - 161.54 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE - 161.54 TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN CHECK AMT - 161.54 TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN NET PAYABLE - 161.54 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT - 516.50 TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE - 516.50 rlf� Vs RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 09:26:05 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 FUND - 0100 - INTERNAL S7 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL 0100 3751 M010402 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 3RVICES FUND VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 1 /02COBRA MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE C V� RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:28 PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 250.25 0.00 0.00 250.25 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 250.25 250.25 250.25 250.25 01/09/02 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N CITY OF MOORPARK, CA M010402 1 /02HR MEDICAL INS 20 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 100031100000 9010 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 01/04/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE 01/04/02 CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE JANUARY 02 CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 100021000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N M010402 1 /02ADMIN LTD & STD 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 CHECK AMT M010402 1 /02C MGR MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 100021000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02C MGR LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:29 100031000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02C CLERK MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 100031000000 9223 UC REGENTS - EFP N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 06/06/01 M010402 CEPO UNIVERSITY CRED 20 B GARZA 06/06/01 106042 0.00 0.00 100031000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02C CLERK LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CITY CLERK CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY CLERK NET PAYABLE 100031100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 0.00 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02HR MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 100031100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02HR LTD & STD INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 100051000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02ADMIN MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 100051000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02ADMIN LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100051001004 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02ADMIN MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:29 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 3029.45 3029.45 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 131.81 131.81 3161.26 3161.26 1422.87 1422.87 - 115.00 - 115.00 92.35 92.35 1400.22 1400.22 217.74 217.74 19.31 19.31 237.05 237.05 1400.97 1400.97 54.30 54.30 1455.27 1455.27 549.17 549.17 01/09/02 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 1101 M010402 1 /02COMM SRV MEDICAL ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY METROPOLITAN INSURAN N FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED M010402 1 /02COMM SRVC LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 100051001004 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 100075200000 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02IS MGR LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) NET PAYABLE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 M010402 100051100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 100076100000 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02FINANCE MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 100051100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N TOTAL SENIOR 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02FINANCE LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL FINANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL FINANCE NET PAYABLE 100071000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 0.00 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02COMM SRV MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 100071000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02COMM SRVC LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100075200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02VECTOR MEDICAL I 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 100075200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02VECTOR LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE 100076100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02SR CTR MEDICAL I 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 100076100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02SR CTR LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE 1000790000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETT N 01/04/02 0 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:29 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1101 0.00 01/01/02 PAGE 3 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 190.30 190.30 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 739.47 739.47 1900.33 1900.33 73.87 73.87 1974.20 1974.20 399.03 399.03 28.35 28.35 427.38 427.38 1101.48 1101.48 41.37 41.37 1142.85 1142.85 902.49 902.49 117.94 117.94 1020.43 1020.43 945.92 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE M010402 1 /02COMM FAC MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 945.92 100076200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 29.83 M010402 1 /02COMM FAC LTD & S 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 29.83 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES CHECK AMT 975.75 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES NET PAYABLE 975.75 100076300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 1324.93 M010402 1 /02REC MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 1324.93 100076300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 65.45 M010402 1 /02REC LTD & STD IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 65.45 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT 1390.38 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 1390.38 100076301007 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 217.74 M010402 1 /02TEEN COORD MEDIC 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 217.74 100076301007 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 14.36 M010402 1 /02TEEN COORD LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 14.36 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) CHECK AMT 232.10 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) NET PAYABLE 232.10 100081000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 354.12 M010402 1 /02PW MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 354.12 100081000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 17.24 M010402 1 /02PW LTD & STD INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 17.24 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS CHECK AMT 371.36 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS NET PAYABLE 371.36 100083200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 20.02 M010402 1 /02NPDES MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 20.02 100083200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 1.15 M010402 1 /02NPDES LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 1.15 0 TOTALPDES CHECK AMT 21.17 N W RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:30 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE 21.17 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT 14548.89 TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE 14548.89 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:30 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2000 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 200082100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02CROSS GUARD MEDI 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 200082100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02CROSS GUARD LTD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE 200083300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PRKNG ENF MEDICA 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 200083300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PRKNG ENF LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE C RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:30 PAGE 6 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 182.57 182.57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 9.18 9.18 191.75 191.75 563.00 563.00 19.22 19.22 582.22 582.22 773.97 773.97 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2003 - CROSSING GUARD FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 200382100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 M010402 1 /02CROSS GUARD MEDI 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARD FUND NET PAYABLE r s • RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:30 PAGE 7 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 01/01/02 381.93 0.00 381.93 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 381.93 381.93 381.93 381.93 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 220061000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02COM DEV MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 220061000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02COM DEV LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 220064100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02B &S LTD & STD IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY CHECK AMT TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY NET PAYABLE 220064300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02CEO MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 220064300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02CEO LTD & STD IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 220064400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PLANNING MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 220064400000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PLANNING LTD & S 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE O �c ` w RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:30 PAGE 8 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 965.05 965.05 51.04 51.04 1016.09 1016.09 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93 644.87 644.87 58.60 58.60 703.47 703.47 3564.75 3564.75 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 111.77 111.77 3676.52 3676.52 5398.01 5398.01 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2201 - CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 220124300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02AFF HOUSE MEDICA 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 220124300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02AFF HOUSE LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 PAGE 9 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 32.66 0.00 0.00 32.66 0.00 01/01/02 4.41 0.00 0.00 4.41 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 37.07 37.07 37.07 37.07 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/O1 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 230079007901 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1/02AD842 MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 230079007901 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1/02AD842 LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE w e PAGE 10 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 202.34 0.00 0.00 202.34 0.00 01/01/02 9.04 0.00 0.00 9.04 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 211.38 211.38 211.38 211.38 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 240078000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 240078000000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PARKS LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 240078001001 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 240078001001 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02PARKS LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) NET PAYABLE TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE PAGE 11 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 1506.16 1506.16 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 61.34 61.34 1567.50 1567.50 566.14 566.14 13.67 13.67 579.81 579.81 2147.31 2147.31 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 260583100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02ST MAINT MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 260583100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02ST MAINT LTD & S 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 260589008902 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1/02AD842 MEDICAL IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 260589008902 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1/02AD842 LTD & STD 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKWAYS &MEDIANS CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKWAYS &MEDIANS CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE BYO�o�q �rJ PAGE 12 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 2646.27 2646.27 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 127.99 127.99 2774.26 2774.26 41.54 41.54 2.67 2.67 44.21 44.21 2818.47 2818.47 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2701 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 270124400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02CDBG MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 270124400000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02CDBG LTD & STD I 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 PAGE 13 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 54.44 0.00 0.00 54.44 0.00 01/01/02 7.34 0.00 0.00 7.34 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 61.78 61.78 61.78 61.78 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290124200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02MRA MEDICAL INS 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 290124200000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 M010402 1 /02MRA LTD & STD IN 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE O J� r UN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:31 1101 108095 PAGE 14 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 182.27 0.00 0.00 182.27 0.00 01/01/02 20.43 0.00 0.00 20.43 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 202.70 202.70 202.70 202.70 01/09/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 0.00 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 01/01/02 FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 34.28 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290224100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02MRA /ECO MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 290224100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02MRA /ECO LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER NET PAYABLE AO ,C) V A' RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:32 PAGE 15 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 554.50 0.00 0.00 554.50 0.00 01/01/02 34.28 0.00 0.00 34.28 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 588.78 588.78 588.78 588.78 01/09/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 0.00 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 01/01/02 FUND - 5000 - LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 16.40 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 500073100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02PUB TRANS MEDICA 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 500073100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 M010402 1 /02PUB TRANS LTD & 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE V 1 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:32 PAGE 16 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/01/02 200.71 0.00 0.00 200.71 0.00 01/01/02 16.40 0.00 0.00 16.40 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 217.11 217.11 217.11 217.11 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/O1 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 5001 - SOLID WASTE AB939 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 500175307501 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02SLD WST MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 500175307501 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02SLD WST LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL USED OIL GRANT CHECK AMT TOTAL USED OIL GRANT NET PAYABLE 500175307502 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02SLD WST MEDICAL 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108096 0.00 0.00 500175307502 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 01/04/02 1101 0.00 01/01/02 M010402 1 /02SLD WST LTD & ST 20 JANUARY 02 01/04/02 108095 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AR939 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL SOLID WASTE AD939 CHECK AMT TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE V RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 15:30:32 PAGE 17 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 45.12 45.12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 3.17 3.17 48.29 48.29 471.43 471.43 52.88 52.88 524.31 524.31 572.60 572.60 28210.25 28210.25 12/19/01 AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 149.86 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 2,925.84 CHECK REGISTER 381.25 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 110.50 ID #9600616061 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED 138.46 - - - -- VENDOR -- ACCT 107960 1101 12/21/01 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 107961 1101 12/21/01 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 107961 1101 12/21/01 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 107962 1101 12/21/01 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 107963 1101 12/21/01 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 107964 1101 12/21/01 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 107965 1101 12/21/01 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 107966 1101 12/21/01 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 107967 1101 12/21/01 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 107967 1101 12/21/01 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 107968 1101 12/21/01 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT O RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 11:01:43 PAGE 1 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 149.86 F/T REG DEFER COMP 2,120.07 F/T REG DEFER COMP 805.77 2,925.84 UNION DUES 381.25 CASE #SD020444 2,172.50 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 110.50 ID #9600616061 168.46 CASE #41770 138.46 F/T REG DEFER COMP 3,138.10 F/T REG DEFER COMP 1,970.80 5,108.90 P/T REG DEFER COMP 371.25 11,527.02 11,527.02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS O O RUN DATE W FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED TOTAL REPORT 12/19/01 TIME 11:01:45 AMOUNT 11,527.02 11,527.02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/02/02 AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 149.86 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 5,201.01 CHECK REGISTER 2,127.13 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 2,958.16 UNION DUES CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED 2,172.50 - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108085 1101 01/04/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 108086 1101 01/04/02 1947 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DE 2203 108086 1101 01/04/02 1947 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DE 2203 TOTAL CHECK 108087 1101 01/04/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 108087 1101 01/04/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 108088 1101 01/04/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 108089 1101 01/04/02 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 108090 1101 01/04/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 108091 1101 01/04/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 108092 1101 01/04/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 108093 1101 01/04/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 221C 108093 1101 01/04/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 221C TOTAL CHECK 108094 1101 01/04/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 221C TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 0 W a ail RUN DATE 01/02/02 TIME 12:38:31 PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 149.86 SDI 1,065.54 STATE INCOME TAXES 4,135.47 5,201.01 F/T REG DEFER COMP 2,127.13 F/T REG DEFER COMP 831.03 2,958.16 UNION DUES 381.25 CASE #SD020444 2,172.50 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 110.50 ID #9600616061 168.46 CASE #41770 138.46 F/T REG DEFER COMP 3,426.76 F/T REG DEFER COMP 1,451.02 4,877.78 P/T REG DEFER COMP 474.20 16,632.18 16,632.18 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/02/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS G 0 r� FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED TOTAL REPORT RUN DATE 01/02/02 TIME 12:38:36 AMOUNT 16,632.18 16,632.18 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 44.73 11 101C CLERK CELL PHONE CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 11 /01WALTER CELL PHONE 29.09 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 107969 1101 12/19/01 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 84.00 TOTAL CHECK 01359- 0132- 10 /01ENV COALI 396.00 01359 - 0001- 10 /01MOOR -RETA 107970 1101 12/19/01 1009 ABC BALLOON DISTRIBUTORS 9243 107971 1101 12/19/01 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 01359 - 0105- 10 /01MOOR -PW 9102 107971 1101 12/19/01 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 TOTAL CHECK 107972 1101 12/19/01 2837 ACLU- PRINTS 9236 107973 1101 12/19/01 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 107973 1101 12/19/01 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 107973 1101 12/19/01 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 TOTAL CHECK 107974 1101 12/19/01 1804 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTIT 9220 107975 1101 12/19/01 1032 AMERICAR 9254 107975 1101 12/19/01 1032 AMERICAR 9254 107975 1101 12/19/01 1032 AMERICAR 9254 107975 1101 12/19/01 1032 AMERICAR 9254 TOTAL CHECK 107976 1101 12/19/01 2543 ASPHALT PROFESSIONALS, IN 9640 107976 1101 12/19/01 2543 ASPHALT PROFESSIONALS, IN 2102 TOTAL CHECK 107977 1101 12/19/01 2944 ASTRO AUDIO VIDEO LIGHTIN 9208 107978 1101 12/19/01 2222 BARRY, KATIE L 9160 107979 1101 12/19/01 1081 BUDDY'S ALL STARS 9241 107980 (D 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 107980 fir/ 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 107980r 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9601 107980 y�, 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 107980 ` V 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 1 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 11 /01HUNTER CELL PHONE 44.73 11 101C CLERK CELL PHONE 16.36 11 /01MPK PD CELLPHONE 693.30 11 /01KUENY CELL PHONE 43.63 11 /01RILEY CELL PHONE 13.66 11 /01WALTER CELL PHONE 29.09 11 /01MORGENSTERN CELL PHO 31.29 11 /01GILBERT CELL PHONE 21.82 11 /01LOFTUS CELL PHONE 35.36 11 /01LINDLEY CELL PHONE 43.63 11 /01CHUDOBA CELL PHONE 16.36 11 /01H RILEY CELL PHONE 43.63 11 /01SHIGLEY CELL PHONE 32.74 1,065.60 SR CTR NEW YEARS DECORATI 26.62 SZABO -WEEK ENDED11 /30 -19 427.50 SZABO -WEEK END 12/7 -29.5 663.75 1,091.25 J SHAW FINGERPRINTING 10.00 PW WELDING SUPPLIES 40.01 PW BROOM & HARDWARE 50.16 PUSH BROOM BRACE 3.23 93.40 O1 FALL /WINTER RECORDKEEP 34.75 VEHICLE 411 SMOG CHECK 51.75 VEHICLE #5 SMOG CHECK 49.95 VEHICLE #19 SMOG CHECK 51.75 VEHICLE #1 SMOG CHECK 51.75 205.20 LA AVE ST WIDENING 959.14 PYMT #2 RETENTION -95.91 863.23 SR CTR WIRELESS SYSTEM 534.60 LITTLE ELVES WORKSHOP 159.00 CITY OF MPK EMP SHIRTS 167.30 01359 - 0105- 10 /OIMOOR -PW 1,483.50 01359 - 0102- 10 /0IMOOR -COMM -2.10 01359- 0132- 10 /01ENV COALI - 396.00 01359- 0105- 10 /01MOOR -PW 84.00 01359- 0132- 10 /01ENV COALI 396.00 01359 - 0001- 10 /01MOOR -RETA 964.21 01359 - 0001- 10 /01MOOR -RETA 170.15 01359 - 0098- 10 /01MOOR -HR 531.47 01359- 0132- 10 /01ENV COALI 2,640.25 01359 - 0105- 10 /01MOOR -PW 300.75 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0133- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 113.75 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9601 01359 - 0105- 10 /01M0OR -PW 33.42 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359 - 0099- 10 /01MOOR -CRA 476.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359 - 0102- 10 /01MOOR -COMM 476.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0102- 10 /01MOOR -COMM 14.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0102- 10 /01MOOR -COMM 2.10 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0133- 10 /01HIDDEN CR -17.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 98.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359 - 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 15.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359 - 0147- 10 /01MPK V TAB 152.25 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359- 0143- 10 /01A TRUCKIN 10.34 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0133- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 17.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359 - 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN CR -15.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN OR - 119.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359 - 0145- 10 /01MISSION B 3,960.55 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359 - 0144- 10 /01MPK V VAL 1,288.47 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 793.02 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0135- 10 /01HIDDEN CR 119.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0149- 10 /01ARCHSTONE 58.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0149- 10 /01ARCHSTONE -58.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0149- 10 /01ARCHSTONE 386.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0148- 10 /01WESTPOINT 504.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359 - 0148- 10 /01WESTPOINT 75.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0105- 10 /01MOOR -PW 84.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0148- 10 /01WESTPOINT -75.00 107980 1101 12/19/01 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536- 0001- 10 /01MPK CEO 196.53 TOTAL CHECK 14,760.66 107981 1101 12/19/01 1903 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT 9221 2002 CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES 1,960.00 107982 1101 12/19/01 1788 CANTWELL, ALICE A 9160 AWAY WE GROW INSTRUCTOR 1,536.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.150- 10 /01SELF STORAGE 651.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.330- 10 /01ZELMAN DEV -TA 743.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.490- 10 /01JTC ARCHITECT 6,188.84 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402- 10 /01CARD SRV /GLUC 289.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 10 /01CYPRESS LAND 54.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 11 /01TOTAL BILLABLE FEES - 10,500.47 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9143 11 /01PALN CHECK RESIDENTI 3,167.83 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9144 11 /01PLAN CHECK NON -RESID 1,237.69 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /01CITY ENG RETA 2,031.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /01CITY ENG RETA 338.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9147 11101NON RESIDENTIAL PERM 2,733.75 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9146 11 /01RESIDENTIAL PERMIT 3,361.20 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.246- 10 /01CNTRY CLUB ES 6,398.25 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.316- 10 /01SDI TR5004 34.25 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 84.330 -9/00 400 MINOR ST 6.13 107984 107984 1101 1101 12/19/01 12/19/01 1120 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES 2711 2711 84.244- 10 /01CNTRY CLUB 91.040- 1 /01SUNCAL RPD,TT 259.00 238.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.462- 10 /01JOE MIRANDA 76.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.420- 10 /01MILLER /PEACH 2,326.00 107984 107984 1101 1101 12/19/01 12/19/01 1120 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES 9601 2711 83.420- 10 /01LA AVE EAST 91.040- 2 /01SUNCAL PROPERT 25.00 1,607.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.040- 3 /01SUNCAL PROPERT 2,305.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 4 /01LA AVE EAST AL 42,610.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.201- 4 /01DALY & ASSOCIA 19.00 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.324- 10 /0ILENNAR HOMES 434.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.056- 10 /0IPEACH HILL LL 80.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.241- 10 /01MPK PARTNERS 790.20 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.332- 10 /0IZELMAN DEVELO 281.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.340- 10 /01G MOLINEUX 1,343.30 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 11 /01TOTAL AMOUNT DUES 40,866.30 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.055- 10 /0IPEACH HILL LL 344.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.341- 10 /01G MOLINEUX 463.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.371- 10 /01MPK HIGH SCHO 219.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.054- 10 /0IPEACH HILL LL 65.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.027- 10 /0IRICE DEV -COND 355.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.374- 10 /0IHIGH SCH PRKN 102.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.335- 10 /0ILENNAR HOMES 289.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.375- 10 /01MPK HIGH SCHO 346.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.377- 10 /0IHIGH SCH PRKN 1,113.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.376- 10 /0IHIGH SCH PRKN 175.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.382- 10 /OIADELPHIA -PACI 1,381.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 10 /01ADELPHIA -WORL 4,200.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.237- 10 /0ICABRILLO ECON 2,158.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.572- 10 /01CT FINANCIAL 1,112.80 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.063- 10 /0IWEST AMERICA 202.35 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.317- 10 /01SDI TR 5004 114.25 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.345- 10 /01PAC COMMUNITI 275.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.307- 10 /0ILENNAR HOMES 119.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.427- 10 /01ARCHSTONE APT 1,050.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.330- 10 /0ILENNAR HOMES 437.92 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.426- 10 /01ARCHSTONE APT 142.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.332- 10 /01LENNAR HOMES 47.65 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /0ICITY ENG RETA 338.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9147 10 /01NON -RES PERMIT FEES 3,305.22 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.410- 10 /0IRICHARD LEE 42.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9143 10 /01RESIDENTIAL PLAN CK 4,423.98 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9146 10 /01RESIDENT PERMIT FEES 3,386.57 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003- 10 /01ENCROACHMENTS 4,793.60 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.109- 10 /01CCI TELECOMMU 38.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.108- 10 /01RBF CONSULTIN 13.50 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 10 /0ITRAFFIC ENG R 427.00 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9144 10 /01NON -RES PLAN CHECK 990.88 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 10 /0ITOTAL BILLABLE FEES - 12,106.65 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.331- 10 /0ILENNAR HOMES 499.75 107984 1101 12/19/01 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 10 /01TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 61,020.50 TOTAL CHECK 191,885.09 107985 1101 12/19/01 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 MPK PD POWERPACK WINDOWS 73.83 107985 1101 12/19/01 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 MPK PD SCANNER,PRINTER 797.15 107985 1101 12/19/01 1144 COMPUWAVE 9504 DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSOR 931.97 TOTAL CHECK 1,802.95 107986 O 1101 12/19/01 2945 CONTRERAS, STEPHANI 2607 REFUND CIT #164839 40.00 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02TEEN COOR VISION INS 8.00 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PW VISION INS 10.55 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1/02AD842 LANDS VISION IN 7.25 107987 /'yam 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02ADMIN VISION INS 42.65 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 3751 1 /02COBP-A VISION INS 53.80 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02ADMIN VISION INS 20.70 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02C MGR VISION INS 46.60 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02CROSS GUARD VISION IN 16.10 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02COM DEV VISION INS 17.90 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02CEO VISION INS 24.25 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PLANNING VISION INS 50.25 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02AFF HOUSE VISION INS 1.20 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1/02AD842 VISION INS 1.19 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02CDBG VISION INS 2.00 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02MRA VISION INS 6.80 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02MRA /ECO VISION INS 32.70 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PUB TRANS VISION INS 4.49 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02SLD WASTE VISION INS .80 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PARKS VISION INS 50.01 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PRKNG ENF VISION INS 15.24 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02ST MAINT VISION INS 70.46 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02SLD WASTE VISION INS 9.29 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02COMM SRVC VISION INS 9.90 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02COMM FAC VISION INS 31.05 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02SR CTR VISION INS 15.90 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02VECTOR VISION INS 41.40 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02FINANCE VISION INS 37.86 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02NPDES VISION INS .56 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02PARKS VISION INS 20.70 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02REC VISION INS 42.70 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02HR VISION INS 8.00 107987 1101 12/19/01 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 1 /02C CLERK VISION INS 70.10 TOTAL CHECK 770.40 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 SR CTR COPY MACHINE SUPPL 39.79 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.78 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.59 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.60 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 62.97 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.14 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SLD WST OFFICE SUPPLIES 27.83 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.58 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COM SRVC OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.63 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9501 AVRC LASER PAPER 38.69 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PARKS OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.85 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.24 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 93.13 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9501 AVRC OFFICE CABINET 168.15 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.67 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 20.32 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 MRA /HOUSING OFFICE SUPPLI 12.99 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.11 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.94 107988 #dk wilol 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 C CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES 319.93 107988 4=1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 COM DEV FILE PKTS 37.79 107988 jai lol 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HR OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.07 107988 Nvoilol 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 13.78 107988 "101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.64 107988 0101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.57 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.62 107988 101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES 144.40 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 INFO SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPL 119.81 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 74.77 COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 1.86 CHECK REGISTER 67.99 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 10 /01FINGERPRINT APPS -3 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR ACCT 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 107988 1101 12/19/01 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 HR TO S VELU -PANEL PACKET TOTAL CHECK SHIGLEY TO PAUL THIMMING 18.97 107989 1101 12/19/01 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 107989 1101 12/19/01 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 CITY HALL FIRE EXT SERVIC TOTAL CHECK AVRC FIRE EXT SERVICE 140.66 107990 1101 12/19/01 2396 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHIC 9205 107991 1101 12/19/01 1690 DOYLE SHAW ICE 9204 107992 1101 12/19/01 2931 ECKHART TRAILER HITCH AND 9208 107993 1101 12/19/01 1204 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 9103 107994 1101 12/19/01 1212 ENGRAVING WIZARD 9205 107994 1101 12/19/01 1212 ENGRAVING WIZARD 9205 4TH QTR O1 PROPERTY TAXES TOTAL CHECK 1,775.00 107995 1101 12/19/01 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9236 107995 1101 12/19/01 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9231 TOTAL CHECK 107996 1101 12/19/01 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 107997 1101 12/19/01 2947 FLAVELL, TENNENBAUM & EDW 9103 107998 1101 12/19/01 1230 FOSTER'S FIRE EXTINGUISHE 9103 107998 1101 12/19/01 1230 FOSTER'S FIRE EXTINGUISHE 9252 107998 1101 12/19/01 1230 FOSTER'S FIRE EXTINGUISHE 9103 TOTAL CHECK 107999 1101 12/19/01 1236 GALL'S INC 9208 107999 1101 12/19/01 1236 GALL'S INC 9205 107999 1101 12/19/01 1236 GALL'S INC 9505 TOTAL CHECK 108000 1101 12/19/01 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 108001 1101 12/19/01 2940 HAROLD C. WHITE 9283 108002 1101 12/19/01 1765 HAWKS & ASSOCIATES INC 962C 108002 1101 12/19/01 1765 HAWKS & ASSOCIATES INC 962C TOTAL CHECK 108003 1101 12/19/01 1269 HDL, COREN & CONE, INC 9102 108003 1101 12/19/01 1269 HDL, COREN & CONE, INC 9102 108003 1101 12/19/01 1269 HDL, COREN & CONE, INC 9102 TOTAL CHECK 108004 1101 12/19/01 2910 HERK EDWARDS, INC. 9622 �* r 108005 1101 12/19/01 1275 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & 9102 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 5 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT INFO SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPL 74.77 COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.92 COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.86 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.99 1,536.15 10 /01FINGERPRINT APPS -3 96.00 10 /01FINGERPRINT APPS -4 128.00 224.00 MOBILE HOME #12 TITLE TRN 57.00 VECTOR DRY ICE FOR TRAPS 11.00 CLASS III /IV HEAVY DUTY 458.47 EDC -VC BUSINESS ENHANCEME 5,000.00 SANDQUIST -DESK SIGNAGE 11.24 LOOSBROCK DESKHOLDER 23.01 34.25 HR TO S VELU -PANEL PACKET 16.90 SHIGLEY TO PAUL THIMMING 18.97 35.87 CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 15.20 APPRAISAL 401 ACRE SITE 8,400.00 COM FAC FIRE EXT SERVICE 219.20 CITY HALL FIRE EXT SERVIC 1,036.26 AVRC FIRE EXT SERVICE 140.66 1,396.12 PARKS TRUCK LIGHTS,SCANNE 549.03 COM FAC SAFETY GLOVES 30.00 PARKS TRUCK LIGHT SWITCH 161.54 740.57 LA AVENUE /BELTRAMO ROAD 537.50 VAN BREE HOME APPRAISAL 350.00 8 /01AV PRK EAST RR UTILIT 8,672.12 11 /01AV PRK UTILITY EXPAN 4,915.05 13,587.17 4TH QTR O1 PROPERTY TAXES 591.66 4TH QTR O1 PROPERTY TAXES 591.66 4TH QTR O1 PROPERTY TAXES 591.68 1,775.00 AVRC GYM BLEACHERS REMOVE 2,592.00 4TH QTR 01SALES TAX RECOV 1,533.07 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------------- VENDOR - -- ACCT DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 108005 1101 12/19/01 1275 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & 9102 4TH QTR O1 CONTRACT SVC 900.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,433.07 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PW EMP ASSIST PROGRAM 2.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02REC EMP ASSIST PROGRA 7.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02SR CTR EMP ASSIST PRO 2.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02COM FAC EMP ASSIST PR 3.76 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02COM SRV EMP ASSIST PR 2.26 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02AFF HOUSE EMP ASSIST .37 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02MRA HOUSE EMP ASSIST 2.12 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1/02AD842 EMP ASSIST PROG .86 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02CEO EMP ASSIST PROGRA 3.87 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1/02AD842 EMP ASSIST PROG .17 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02FINANCE EMP ASSIST PR 6.25 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02VECTOR EMP ASSIST PRO 5.00 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PRKNG ENF EMP ASSIST 2.49 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02CROSS GUARD EMP ASSIS 1.98 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PW EMP ASSIST PROGRAM 1.93 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02ST MAINT EMP ASSIST 13.33 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02NPDESEMP ASSIST PROGR .10 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02SLD WST EMP ASSIST PR .25 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02SLD WST EMP ASSIST PR 2.62 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02COM DEV EMP ASSIST 5.63 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PARKS EMP ASSIST PROG 2.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02CDBG EMP ASSIST PROGR .63 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PLANNING EMP ASSIST 10.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02MRA /ECO EMP ASSIST 6.25 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PUB TRANS EMP ASSIST 1.11 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02PARKS EMP ASSIST PROG 6.64 106006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02HR EMP ASSIST PROG 2.50 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02C MGR EMP ASSIST PROG 8.13 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02C CLERK EMP ASSIST PR 10.00 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02ADMIN EMP ASSIST PROG 6.25 108006 1101 12/19/01 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 1 /02ADMIN EMP ASSIST PROG 2.50 TOTAL CHECK 122.50 108007 1101 12/19/01 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9304 PW SAFETY GLOVES 81.19 108007 1101 12/19/01 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PW BLDNG HARDWARE 59.12 108007 1101 12/19/01 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PW SMALL TOOLS 1.88 TOTAL CHECK 142.19 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 WOODRANCH -PANEL LUNCH 45.85 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 LA PLAYITA -LUNCH MTG 29.79 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9254 AUTO ZONE -PD PARTS 45.87 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 BJ'S- ACM,CDD,ASD MTG 9.76 108008 .+rA 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9225 H RILEY SOUTHWEST AIRLINE 129.50 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9225 SHIGLEY SOUTHWEST AIRLINE 100.75 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 WOODRANCH -PANEL LUNCH MTG 45.00 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9201 11 /O1EZ2 INTERNET 45.00 108008 1101 N 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9225 H RILEY- SOUTHWEST AIRLINE 30.00 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 CHAMBER BREAKFAST 30.00 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9225 MILHOUSE - SOUTHWEST AIRLIN 169.50 108008 / 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 ACTIVE.COM STORES 53.95 108008 V J1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 395.00 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9252 DICK KRANZLER SIGNS 69.55 108008 1101 12/19/01 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9202 BUY.COM PALM PILOT 161.41 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 203.24 ALCO - SENSOR IV W /MEMORY CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 21.39 CHECK REGISTER 2,615.38 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 178.91 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT ARCHSTONE LEGAL FEES TOTAL CHECK ARCHSTONE ADMIN CHARGE 688.50 108009 1101 12/19/01 2849 INTOXIMETERS 9504 108009 1101 12/19/01 2849 INTOXIMETERS 9504 108009 1101 12/19/01 2849 INTOXIMETERS 9504 AVCP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERI TOTAL CHECK MPK ANNEX ELECTRICAL ENGI 1,250.00 108010 1101 12/19/01 1980 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 9252 108011 1101 12/19/01 1312 JOLLY JUMPS INC 9244 108012 1101 12/19/01 1321 K -MART 9204 108013 1101 12/19/01 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2754 108013 1101 12/19/01 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 108013 1101 12/19/01 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 11 /01RECREATION LONG DIST TOTAL CHECK 165.02 108014 1101 12/19/01 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 108014 1101 12/19/01 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 TOTAL CHECK 11 /01PW ADMIN CAR WASH 21.00 108015 1101 12/19/01 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 108016 1101 12/19/01 2513 LUNDEEN & ARNOLD 9620 108016 1101 12/19/01 2513 LUNDEEN & ARNOLD 9205 TOTAL CHECK 108017 1101 12/19/01 2854 MARON, DEBORAH 9102 108018 1101 12/19/01 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 108018 1101 12/19/01 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 108018 1101 12/19/01 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 TOTAL CHECK 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 9420 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 9420 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 9420 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 9420 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 942C 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 942C 108019 1101 12/19/01 1784 MCI WORLDCOM 942C TOTAL CHECK 108020 1101 12/19/01 2342 METRO PARKING & TRAFFIC S 9253 108021 1101 12/19/01 1978 MITY -LITE, INC. 920E 108021 © 1101 12/19/01 1978 MITY -LITE, INC. 920E 108021 1101 12/19/01 1978 MITY -LITE, INC. 920E TOTAL CHECK 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 7 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 1,360.93 A/S IV MOUTHPIECES 203.24 ALCO - SENSOR IV W /MEMORY 2,390.75 ALCO SENSORS FREIGHT 21.39 2,615.38 SR CTR RR MOTORS 178.91 1 /4BUNGEE RUN -TEEN EVENT 125.00 VECTOR MOSQUITO FISH SUPP 125.22 ARCHSTONE LEGAL FEES 4,590.00 ARCHSTONE ADMIN CHARGE 688.50 ARCHSTONE ADMIN REVENUE - 688.50 4,590.00 12 /01SR CTR JANITORIAL 589.00 12 /01SR CTR JANITORIAL 960.00 1,549.00 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT 73.83 AVCP ELECTRICAL ENGINEERI 800.00 MPK ANNEX ELECTRICAL ENGI 1,250.00 2,050.00 12 /01SR CTR EXERCISE 55.50 12 /01PW WATER & EQUIP REN 23.90 12 /01AVRC WATER & EQUIP 30.85 12 /01CH WATER & EQUIP RNT 147.55 202.30 11 /01MRA /ECO LONG DISTANC 6.95 11 /01FINANCE LONG DISTANC 3.42 11 /01CITY HALL LONG DISTA 114.62 11 /01C MGR LONG DISTANCE 9.40 11 /01C COUNCIL LONG DISTA 25.72 11 /01VECTOR LONG DISTANCE .04 11 /01RECREATION LONG DIST 4.87 165.02 REMOVE EXISTING INCANDESC 4,765.48 MEDIUM DUTY TABLE CART 246.14 30" X 6' GRAY ADJUSTABLE 574.67 30" X 6' GRAY RECTANGULAR 2,176.05 2,996.86 11 /01PW ADMIN CAR WASH 21.00 11 /01PW STREETS CAR WASH 21.00 11 /01PRKNG ENF CAR WASH 3.50 11101CROSS GUARDS CAR WAS 3.50 11 /01VECTOR CAR WASH 7.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 180.00 236.00 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 11 /01PARKS FUEL CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 11 /01PRKNG ENF FUEL 18.75 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108022 1101 12/19/01 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 12 /7- 1 /3SKATERAMP RENTAL TOTAL CHECK NEW TRASH BIN @ AVCP 354.96 108023 427.19 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9254 108023 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 108023 REFUND -COM CTR RENTAL 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 108023 9,230.00 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 108023 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 108023 YARDS MAINT SUPPLIES 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 108023 38.64 1101 12/19/01 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 1,515.70 TOTAL CHECK 11 /01GLENWOOD PRK PHONE 59.79 108024 11 /01MILLER PARK PHONE 1101 12/19/01 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 108024 53.96 1101 12/19/01 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 41.33 TOTAL CHECK 11 /01CAMPUS CYN PHONE 59.79 108025 11 /01 T -1 PHONE LINE 1101 12/19/01 2918 MONSTERTRAK.COM 9236 108026 143.50 1101 12/19/01 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9103 108027 1101 12/19/01 1383 MOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMME 9240 108028 PENTAMATION - FUND 1101 12/19/01 2568 MOORPARK MOMS CONNECTION 2611 108028 1101 12/19/01 2568 MOORPARK MOMS CONNECTION 3401 TOTAL CHECK 108029 1101 12/19/01 2530 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN 9103 108030 1101 12/19/01 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9208 108030 1101 12/19/01 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 108030 1101 12/19/01 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 TOTAL CHECK 108031 1101 12/19/01 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9252 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 © 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108032 1101 12/19/01 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 TOTAL CHECK 108033 1101 12/19/01 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 8 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 11 /01MPK PD CAR WASH 180.00 236.00 11 /01TRUCK #16 OIL CHANGE 49.78 11 /01PARKS FUEL 56.60 11 /01PW STREETS FUEL 5.75 11 /01PRKNG ENF FUEL 18.75 11101CROSS GUARDS FUEL 18.75 11 /01MPK PD FUEL 63.30 11 /01PW ADMIN FUEL 5.75 218.68 12 /7- 1 /3SKATERAMP RENTAL 72.23 NEW TRASH BIN @ AVCP 354.96 427.19 SR CTR REC ASSISTANT AD 75.00 1 /02SR CTR NEWS TYPESETTI 160.50 02 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES 5,000.00 REFUND -COM CTR DEPOSIT 300.00 REFUND -COM CTR RENTAL 185.00 485.00 11 /01GRAVES ACCT SRVC -142 9,230.00 INSPECTION MIRROR 2.66 PARKS TRUCK FUSES & CLEAN 7.79 PARKS TRUCK MAINTENANCE 13.56 24.01 YARDS MAINT SUPPLIES 26.46 11 /01C CLERK PHONE 20.46 11 /01C MGR PHONE 38.64 11 /01REC PHONE 96.18 11 /01CITYWIDE PHONE 1,515.70 11 /01CAMPUS PRK PHONE 59.79 11 /01GLENWOOD PRK PHONE 59.79 11 /01MILLER PARK PHONE 59.79 11 /01POINDEXTER PARK PHON 59.79 11 /01COMM CTR PARK PHONE 53.96 11 /01MPK PD PHONE 14.61 11 /01VECTOR PHONE 41.33 11 /01VISTA BUS MODEM 14.91 11 /01CAMPUS CYN PHONE 59.79 11 /01 T -1 PHONE LINE 179.17 11 /01COMM SRVC PHONE 33.27 11 /01EMERGENCY MGT PHONE 143.50 11 /01ST MAINT PHONE 47.26 11 /01FINANCE PHONE 35.36 2,533.30 10 /01HIGH ST PROJECT SRVC 6,855.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 108034 1101 12/19/01 1434 PARK LANE CAR WASH INC 9254 CEO CAR WASH 6.00 108035 1101 12/19/01 2380 PARTY PLEASERS 9244 3 BURNER GRIDDLE FOR BREA 55.00 108036 1101 12/19/01 1210 PAS /EMECO 9250 POSTAGE MACHINE INK ROLLE 34.77 108037 1101 12/19/01 1856 PERPETUAL STORAGE 9102 CITY CLERK STORAGE FEES 13.72 108038 1101 12/19/01 2946 PHILLIPS, VERONICA 2607 REFUND CIT# 161456 40.00 108039 1101 12/19/01 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 12 /19CC MTG AGENDA PACKET 397.94 108039 1101 12/19/01 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9205 J HERNANDEZ NAME TAG 19.21 108039 1101 12/19/01 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 3 PAGE RECEIPTS 205.65 TOTAL CHECK 622.80 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 IGNITION ON /OFF SWITCH 13.08 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 IGNITION ON /OFF SWITCH 6.54 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 IGNITION ON /OFF SWITCH 4.22 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 PUBLIC ADDRESS (OUTSIDE) 39.37 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 MOTOROLA CDM 1250 MOBILE 892.85 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 PUBLIC ADDRESS (OUTSIDE) 61.07 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 MOTOROLA CDM 1250 MOBILE 446.50 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 PUBLIC ADDRESS (OUTSIDE) 122.12 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 VHF ANTENNA + INSTALLATIO 12.89 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 VHF ANTENNA + INSTALLATIO 39.98 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 VHF ANTENNA + INSTALLATIO 19.99 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 1.53 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 4.73 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 2.36 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 RADIO & ANTENNA INSTALLAT 94.52 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9505 RADIO & ANTENNA INSTALLAT 188.99 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 RADIO & ANTENNA INSTALLAT 60.93 108040 1101 12/19/01 1459 PROCOMM 9208 MOTOROLA CDM 1250 MOBILE 287.86 TOTAL CHECK 2,299.53 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 18.20 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.20 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 18.20 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.21 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.21 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.20 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 16.69 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 16.69 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 18.20 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 17.06 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 16.69 108041 © 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 17.06 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.20 108041 fir✓ 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 18.21 108041 1101 12/19/01 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 32.53 TOTAL CHECK 280.55 108042 1101 12/19/01 2856 RLF PUBLISHING 9232 PDF FILE FOR WEBPAGE 200.00 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 9 /8FUENTES BABY SHOWER 65.00 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 65.00 8 /110RTIZ B -DAY PARTY 140.00 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 7/21 RIOS B -DAY PARTY 115.00 CHECK REGISTER 140.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 16,000.00 EXTRA GRADING CHARGE CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR ACCT 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 108043 1101 12/19/01 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 TOTAL CHECK 01 IDENT A DRUG REF BOOK 38.22 108044 1101 12/19/01 2870 ROCK DESIGNS POOLS &WATERS 9632 108044 1101 12/19/01 2870 ROCK DESIGNS POOLS &WATERS 9632 108044 1101 12/19/01 2870 ROCK DESIGNS POOLS &WATERS 9632 TOTAL CHECK 108045 1101 12/19/01 2496 SAFETY STRIPING SERVICE 9102 108046 1101 12/19/01 1511 SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC 9103 108046 1101 12/19/01 1511 SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC 9103 TOTAL CHECK 108047 1101 12/19/01 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 108047 1101 12/19/01 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 TOTAL CHECK 108048 1101 12/19/01 1517 SIMI VALLEY BASE, INC 9310 108049 1101 12/19/01 1527 SMART & FINAL 9241 108049 1101 12/19/01 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 TOTAL CHECK 108050 1101 12/19/01 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 108050 1101 12/19/01 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 TOTAL CHECK 108051 1101 12/19/01 1651 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9640 108051 1101 12/19/01 1651 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9640 TOTAL CHECK 108052 1101 12/19/01 2597 SPRINGFRESH 9621 108053 1101 12/19/01 1552 STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL 9203 108053 1101 12/19/01 1552 STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL 9203 TOTAL CHECK 108054 1101 12/19/01 2934 SULA -GOFF, GARY G 9244 108055 1101 12/19/01 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102 108056 1101 12/19/01 1566 TELCOM INC 9254 108057 1101 12/19/01 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 108057 1101 12/19/01 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 108057 1101 12/19/01 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 108057 1101 12/19/01 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 TOTAL CHECK 108058 1101 12/19/01 2943 THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH 9220 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 10 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 8 /2BARTLETT B -DAY PARTY 65.00 8 /110RTIZ B -DAY PARTY 140.00 8 /24PEREZ B -DAY PARTY 65.00 8 /25MEZA B -DAY 90.00 7/21 RIOS B -DAY PARTY 115.00 8 /18TRONCOSO BAPTISM 140.00 11 /1- 12 /1REDEVELOPMENT 680.00 PLUMBING,PONDS,ROCK POUR 16,000.00 EXTRA GRADING CHARGE 3,800.00 PYMT #4 MPK ART PROJECT 10,000.00 29,800.00 CONTRACTUAL STRIPING 750.00 01/02 AD84 -2 ASMNT ADMIN 2,000.00 01/02 AD84 -2 ASMNT ADMIN 2,000.00 6,873.00 4,000.00 11 /13MILLER PKWY ACCIDENT 1,250.00 11 /01INTERSECTION MAINTEN 1,405.65 255.73 2,655.65 YARD POTHOLES REPAIR 69.23 MPK PD HOLIDAY DINNER SUP 193.26 SANTA EVENT SUPPLIES 93.72 286.98 11 /1- 12 /1CITYWIDE ELECTRI 22,006.52 11 /1- 12 /1REDEVELOPMENT 78.52 22,085.04 INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CO 15,201.05 INSTALL 15 ADTNL ST LIGHT 10,974.60 26,175.65 AVCP GYM FLOOR INSTALLATI 6,873.00 COPIER TONER SUPPLIES 652.70 COPIER TONER SUPPLIES 255.73 908.43 12/20- 22SANTA VISITS 225.00 11 /01DATA LINE SERVICES 7.15 TRUCK #43 LIGHT BAR INSTA 492.65 11 /01COM FAC GAS 73.62 11 /01MOBILEHOME PRK GAS 260.44 11 /01PW BLDG GAS 26.31 11 /01AVRC GAS 154.76 515.13 01 IDENT A DRUG REF BOOK 38.22 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 11 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 108059 1101 12/19/01 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 00 CYCLE CLUTCH,BRAKES 1,436.84 108059 1101 12/19/01 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 01 KAWASAKI SERVICE 52.74 TOTAL CHECK 1,489.58 108060 1101 12/19/01 2274 TIERRA REJADA FARMS 9244 SANTA'S SLEIGH RIDES 1,348.20 108061 1101 12/19/01 1863 TRI COUNTY OFFICE FURNITU 9501 FURNITURE FOR PUBLIC WORK 10,448.56 108062 1101 12/19/01 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 JR BASKETBALL TROPHIES FO 842.89 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01PW STREETS FUEL 442.08 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10/01AD842 FUEL 10.68 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10101CROSS GUARDS FUEL 7.81 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01VECTOR FUEL 111.08 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01RECREATION FUEL 95.56 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01MPK PD FUEL 37.90 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01TPAFFIC ENF FUEL 11.72 108063 1101 12/19/01 1600 UNION 76 9255 10 /01PARKS FUEL 138.51 TOTAL CHECK 855.34 108064 1101 12/19/01 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 TIERRA REJADA MEDIANS 92.45 108064 1101 12/19/01 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9103 COM CTR ROOF 8.13 108064 1101 12/19/01 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9103 COM CTR ROOF COPIES 11.21 TOTAL CHECK 111.79 108065 1101 12/19/01 2601 USA SPORTS PHOTOGRAPHY 9244 FALL JBL PICTURES 315.09 108066 1101 12/19/01 1604 VALERIO, BENITO 9102 11 /01MPK PD JANITORIAL SR 1,100.00 108066 1101 12/19/01 1604 VALERIO, BENITO 9102 12 /01MPK PD JANITORIAL SR 1,100.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,200.00 108067 1101 12/19/01 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 10 /01 FY00 /01CLOSING SRVC 1,785.00 108068 1101 12/19/01 2277 VELLIGAN, GARY 9244 1 /4AFTER DARK TEEN DANCE 725.00 108069 1101 12/19/01 2283 VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331 12/01 Z12 LANDSCAPE SRVCS 3,778.50 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9236 10 /01FINGERPRINTS -1 10.00 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9236 10 /01FINGERPRINTS -4 40.00 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01ADMIN ASSISTANT 5,285.08 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01PATROL SRVCS 169,729.67 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /0ICOMUNITY SRVCS 10,018.33 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01DARE OFFICER 9,151.08 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01ADJUST CADET 8 -10 /01 - 4,185.42 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01HIGH SCHOOL RES OFF 9,151.08 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01TRAFFIC SERVICES 23,040.92 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01INVESTIGATIVE SRVCS 30,349.17 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9118 11 /01OVERTIME -REG & COURT 7,566.69 108070 108070 1101 1101 12/19/01 12/19/01 1616 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 9119 11 /01SPECIAL ENF OFFICER 11 /01OVERTIME AFTER DARK 10,185.50 161.14 108070 1101 12/19/01 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 11 /01MIDDLE SCHOOL RESOUR 9,151.08 108070 1101 TOTAL 12/19/01 CHECK 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9254 11 /01VEHICLE CHARGES 12,029.97 291,684.29 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9236 11 /18 RECREATION ASSISTAN 136.04 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 12 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 HEARING -GPA 99 -01 WEST PO 126.28 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 HEARING -SUP LAW ENF GRANT 36.96 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 HEARING -LAW ENF BLOCK GRA 30.80 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT O1 312.19 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 NOTICE -DEPT OF TRANSPORT 56.21 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 NOTICE OF HEARING -OSCAR 321.68 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 ORD 273 WIRELESS TELECOMM 208.67 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 HEARING - ASADURIAN INV 105.49 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9601 NOTICE INVITING SEALED BI 135.52 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9601 NOTICE INVITING SEALED BI 135.52 108071 1101 12/19/01 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 PUB HEARING - ASADURIAN INV 123.97 TOTAL CHECK 1,729.33 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5CAMPUS PARK 724.97 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5ZONE 11 WATER 53.79 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5CAMPUS CYN PARK 1,248.28 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5ZONE 1 WATER 96.64 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20MONTE VISTA 56.30 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20ZONE 12 4,898.02 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20ZONE 6 35.02 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20MILLER PARK 2,676.75 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20PEACH HILL PARK 1,581.17 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5PRKWYS & MEDIANS 540.84 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9252 10 /3- 12 /5REDEVELOPMENT 19.96 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 10 /3- 12 /5GRIFFIN PARK 817.62 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20ZONE 5 419.85 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9 /19- 11 /20PRKWYS & MEDIAN 1,230.95 108072 1101 12/19/01 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 9/19- 11 /20ZONE 2 1,401.92 TOTAL CHECK 15,802.08 108073 1101 12/19/01 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 11 /27MUSD MTG CAMERA RNTL 200.00 108073 1101 12/19/01 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 11 /27MUSD MTG TAPING 265.00 108073 1101 12/19/01 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 11 /26PLANNING COMM MTG 200.00 108073 1101 12/19/01 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 10 /0IGRAPHIC SRV /BBS PROG 636.00 108073 1101 12/19/01 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 11 /01CONTRACT VIDEO PRODU 2,122.00 TOTAL CHECK 3,423.00 108074 1101 12/19/01 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9244 AVRC GYM SCOREBOARD LIGHT 81.32 108074 1101 12/19/01 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9252 BSKTBL SCOREBOARD COVER 25.68 108074 1101 12/19/01 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9204 SECURITY LIGHT TIMERS 18.46 108074 1101 12/19/01 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9252 PARKS HARDWARE CASE 40.66 TOTAL CHECK 166.12 108075 1101 12/19/01 2658 WALTCO PROMOTIONS 9244 SKATEBOARD KEY CHAIN 1,137.50 108075 1101 12/19/01 2658 WALTCO PROMOTIONS 9244 KEY CHAIN SET UP FEE 48.72 TOTAL CHECK 1,186.22 108076 1101 12/19/01 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 ZONE 3 TREE TRIMMING 273.00 108076 1101 12/19/01 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMING 5,498.10 108076 1101 12/19/01 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 ZONE 1 TREE TRIMMING 337.51 108076 108076 1101 1101 12/19/01 12/19/01 2309 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 9330 ZONE 10 TREE TRIMMING ZONE 2 TREE TRIMMING 156.00 663.00 108076 1101 12/19/01 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 ZONE 4 TREE TRIMMING 117.00 TOTAL CHECK 7,044.61 108077 1101 12/19/01 1630 WEST COAST PIZZA 9244 FALL JBL PIZZA PARTY 319.33 RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- 108078 1101 12/19/01 1631 WEST GROUP 9220 CA COURT RULES FED 2001 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 AVRC KITCHEN LIQUID NAILS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW BLDG TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW PAINT BRUSHES 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW BLDG TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW SMALL TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW SMALL TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW BLDG TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9303 NEW PW BLDG HARDWARE 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 MPK PD MAGNETIC HOOK CUP 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 MPK PD SMALL TOOLS 108079 1101 12/19/01 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 MPK PD SMALL TOOLS,HARDWA TOTAL CHECK 108080 1101 12/19/01 1787 WILLIS, PAMELA S 9160 AWAY WE GROW INSTRUCTOR 108081 1101 12/19/01 2843 WOLCO 9203 PW /PARKS YARD TONER 108082 1101 12/19/01 1519 WORKPLACE, THE -SIMT VALLE 9236 J SHAW PRE -EMP PHYSICAL 108083 1101 12/19/01 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 NO STOPPING ANYTIME SIGNS TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT C C W W RUN DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:04:57 PAGE 13 AMOUNT 5.35 6.39 2.56 6.41 6.66 12.63 5.84 23.08 4.04 1.81 22.64 326.26 418.32 1,152.00 123.60 60.00 232.73 748,940.11 748,940.11 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12/19/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS O �O Y W RUN FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 6,747.79 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 355,042.60 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 99.84 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 2,326.00 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 14,387.17 2151 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 29,800.00 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 110,890.97 2201 CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 351.57 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 32,064.25 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 434.15 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 2,200.44 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 273.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 117.00 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 419.85 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 35.02 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 156.00 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 53.79 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 8,676.52 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 8,904.37 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 70,464.32 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. 102.79 2605 GAS TAX 11,339.71 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 18,085.96 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 2.63 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 7,194.35 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER 18,900.67 4003 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN 1,630.13 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 20.51 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 40.79 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 380.00 6001 MESSENGER 4,079.02 6005 UW /CCB TR4340,1,2,3 &4792 790.20 6015 SUNCAL 4,151.00 6026 SDI 148.50 6047 WEST AMERICA 202.35 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 705.28 6148 PACIFIC COMMUNITIES 275.50 6193 CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR 1,231.80 6262 ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES 6,914.50 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 2,158.50 6360 ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL 880.96 6364 RICE 355.50 6375 PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W 489.00 6385 RICHMOND AM H 434.50 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI 6,673.35 6407 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING 1,274.82 6431 CARDSERVICE 289.00 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 54.50 6473 PACIFIC BELL IPD 41 6,188.84 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 1,024.50 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 113.00 6904 DALY & ASSOC 19.00 6906 GRAHAM MOLINEUX 1,806.30 6907 MOORPARK HS PARKING LOT 1,956.50 6908 ADELPHIA 5,581.50 TOTAL REPORT 748,940.11 DATE 12/19/01 TIME 17:05:03 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 3.60 12 /01ANSWERING SERVICE CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 59.60 CHECK REGISTER 59.39 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED AV PRK LOCK & CHAIN CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108100 1101 01/09/02 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 108100 1101 01/09/02 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 REFUND -PARK FEES TOTAL CHECK FALL SOFTBALL UMPIRE 270.00 108101 1101 01/09/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9204 108101 1101 01/09/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 108101 1101 01/09/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9205 PW ADMIN FUEL TOTAL CHECK PW ADMIN FUEL 3.14 108102 1101 01/09/02 2775 AMERICAN BICYCLE SECURITY 9252 108103 1101 01/09/02 1032 AMERICAR 9254 108104 1101 01/09/02 2872 ANDY'S AUTOMOTIVE 9254 108105 1101 01/09/02 2222 BARRY, KATIE L 9244 108106 1101 01/09/02 2954 BAUTISTA, NATIVIDAD 3850 108107 1101 01/09/02 1067 BOGOYEVAC, PETE 9244 108108 1101 01/09/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 3806 108108 1101 01/09/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2734 108108 1101 01/09/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2751 TOTAL CHECK 108109 1101 01/09/02 1102 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREAT 9221 108110 1101 01/09/02 2933 CEHA TRAVELING SEMINAR SE 9222 108111 1101 01/09/02 1122 CHEVRON USA, INC 9255 108111 1101 01/09/02 1122 CHEVRON USA, INC 9255 TOTAL CHECK 108112 1101 01/09/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 108113 1101 01/09/02 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 TOTAL CHECK 108114 1101 01/09/02 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9303 108114 1101 01/09/02 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 931C 0 TOTAL CHECK 108115 0 1101 01/09/02 1690 DOYLE SHAW ICE 9204 108116 1101 01/09/02 1196 DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9204 108117 A 1101 01/09/02 1212 ENGRAVING WIZARD 920 -1 108118 1101 01/09/02 2634 FETCHET, ERIC 9244 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:17:08 PAGE 1 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 12 /01FAX SERVICE 3.60 12 /01ANSWERING SERVICE 56.00 59.60 PARKS OPERATING SUPPLIES 59.39 TRUCK #45 BALL HITCH 11.76 AV PRK LOCK & CHAIN 67.58 138.73 MPK STATION BIKE LOCKER 85.60 TRUCK #10 SMOG CHECK 51.75 VEHICLE #32 SMOG TEST 49.95 REIMBURSE -CMP MPK TRIP 132.25 REFUND -PARK FEES 64.00 FALL SOFTBALL UMPIRE 270.00 HITCH RANCH ADMIN REVENUE -95.23 HITCH RANCH ADMIN FEE 95.23 10 /12- 11 /9 /01HITCH RANCH 634.85 634.85 02 /03HALL MEMBERSHIP DUES 140.00 WESTERLINE,TRAN TRAINING 210.00 PW ADMIN FUEL 3.13 PW ADMIN FUEL 3.14 6.27 MPK PD KINGSTON FLASH CRD 69.55 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S 267.20 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S 17.12 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S 14.32 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S 1.68 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S .92 WINTER CAMP &BREAKFAST W/S 31.32 332.56 SPEED LIMIT SIGNS 149.80 ASPHALT COLD PATCH -5 GAL 326.99 476.79 VECTOR DRY ICE 11.00 ALL PARKS PAINT SUPPLIES 196.74 MORGENSTERN NAME PLATE 11.24 JBL OFFICIAL 50.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 AMOUNT CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 12.65 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 500.00 CHECK REGISTER JBL OFFICIAL FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 139.36 CAMPUS CYN PRK STAKES CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108119 1101 01/09/02 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 108120 VECTOR OPERATING SUPPLIES 1101 01/09/02 2902 FITZWATER, RYAN D 9244 108121 73.83 1101 01/09/02 2659 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MANAGE 9102 108122 1101 01/09/02 2901 GONZALES, BRYAN 9244 108123 AV GYM SCOREBOARD REPAIR 1101 01/09/02 1272 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C 9211 108124 50.00 1101 01/09/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9205 108124 1101 01/09/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9205 12 /01STATE ROUTE SWEEPING TOTAL CHECK 819.54 108125 1 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL 1101 01/09/02 1923 ICMA PRODUCT FULFILLMENT 9205 108126 88.60 1101 01/09/02 1980 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 9204 108127 1101 01/09/02 1321 K -MART 9204 108128 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 1101 01/09/02 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 108128 32.53 1101 01/09/02 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 TOTAL CHECK 108129 1101 01/09/02 2949 LIBERTY FLAG & SPECIALTY 9205 108130 1101 01/09/02 1354 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDAN 9221 108131 1101 01/09/02 2937 MARGARET L ROTHSCHILD 9243 108132 1101 01/09/02 2528 MATCO TECH, INC. 9252 108133 1101 01/09/02 1366 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY 9205 108134 1101 01/09/02 1912 MMASC 9221 108134 1101 01/09/02 1912 MMASC 9221 TOTAL CHECK 108135 1101 01/09/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 108136 1101 01/09/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9352 108136 1101 01/09/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9350 TOTAL CHECK 108137 1101 01/09/02 1447 PITNEY BOWES 9211 108138 1101 01/09/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2733 108138 ® 1101 01/09/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9620 108138 1101 01/09/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 108138 O 1101 01/09/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 108138 O 1101 01/09/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 TOTAL CHECK 108139 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 108139 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 108139 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:17:08 PAGE 2 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 12.65 JBL OFFICIAL 130.00 01 /02ADMIN AD92 -1 ANNUAL 500.00 JBL OFFICIAL 70.00 ROTOTILLER RENTAL C/W 139.36 CAMPUS CYN PRK STAKES 39.99 MILLER PARK STAKES 39.99 79.98 ANIMAL CONTROL MANAGEMENT 28.04 AV COM CTR A/C FILTERS 107.47 VECTOR OPERATING SUPPLIES 65.86 HEARON SIDEWALK REPAIRS 95.27 PRINCETON S/W REPAIR 73.83 169.10 AVRC AMERICAN FLAG 113.20 02 MSA MEMBERSHIP DUES 65.00 SR CTR NEW YEARS PRIZES 74.83 AV GYM SCOREBOARD REPAIR 464.15 AVRC SOAP & DISPENSER 42.25 02 MEMBERSHIP DUES 50.00 02 MEMBERSHIP DUES 50.00 100.00 STORAGE UNIT RENTAL 136.96 12 /01METROLINK SWEEPING 535.23 12 /01STATE ROUTE SWEEPING 284.31 819.54 1 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL 64.20 UPS TO BONTERRA CONSULTIN 13.90 AVCP UTILITY PROJ COPIES 88.60 CITY OF MPK ENVELOPES 353.10 RIDE GUIDES PRINTING 72.76 1 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER 273.92 802.28 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 17.18 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 17.18 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUUPLIES 32.53 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 17.06 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 17.17 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 1 /23UGALDE- CUSTOMER SRVC 135.00 CHECK REGISTER 135.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED REFUND -AVRC RNTL DEPOSIT 300.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108139 121.00 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 108139 10 /01PW ADMIN FUEL 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 108139 37.03 1101 01/09/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 55.79 02 BRAND MEMBERSHIP DUES TOTAL CHECK 261.40 11 /01TAXI SRVC -75 TRIPS 439.00 108140 700.40 1101 01/09/02 2066 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE 9222 108140 AVCP PARK UTILITIES 1101 01/09/02 2066 PUBLIC SECTOR EXCELLENCE 9222 SUPERVISION BASICS SERIES 350.00 TOTAL CHECK 11 /16WEST POINTE HEARING 133.98 11 /130RDINANCE #274 108141 11 /8NOTICE OF HEARING 1101 01/09/02 2953 RABINA, CHARITO 2611 108142 10.65 1101 01/09/02 2898 RILEY, CLIFF P 9244 108143 1101 01/09/02 1023 S &S SEEDS INC. 9252 108143 1101 01/09/02 1023 S &S SEEDS INC. 9252 108143 1101 01/09/02 1023 S &S SEEDS INC. 9252 TOTAL CHECK 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 108144 1101 01/09/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 TOTAL CHECK 108145 1101 01/09/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 108146 1101 01/09/02 2952 SOLID WASTE ASSOC. OF NOR 9221 108147 1101 01/09/02 1575 THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY 9102 108147 1101 01/09/02 1575 THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY 9102 TOTAL CHECK 108148 1101 01/09/02 1863 TRI COUNTY OFFICE FURNITU 9501 108149 1101 01/09/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 108150 1101 01/09/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 108150 1101 01/09/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 108150 1101 01/09/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 TOTAL CHECK 108151 1101 01/09/02 1157 VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN RESO 9223 108152 1101 01/09/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 108152 1101 01/09/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 106152 © 1101 01/09/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9102 108152 O 1101 01/09/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9220 108152 © 1101 01/09/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 N TOTAL CHECK 108153 1101 01/09/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 108153 1101 01/09/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 TOTAL CHECK RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12 :17:08 PAGE 3 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 17.06 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 17.17 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 16.69 117.81 1 /23UGALDE- CUSTOMER SRVC 135.00 1 /23RILEY- CUSTOMER SRVC 135.00 270.00 REFUND -AVRC RNTL DEPOSIT 300.00 JBL OFFICIAL 60.00 CAMPUS CYN PARK FEED 54.00 CAMPUS CYN PRK GRASS SEED 58.06 AV PARK SEED 121.00 233.06 10101CROSS GUARDS FUEL 7.87 10 /01REC FUEL 63.42 10 /01PW ADMIN FUEL 10.08 10 /01PRKNG ENF FUEL 11.81 10 /01PARKS FUEL 40.38 10 /01PW STREETS FUEL 37.03 10 /01LANDS & LIGHT FUEL 15.53 186.12 WINTER CAMP SUPPLIES 55.79 02 BRAND MEMBERSHIP DUES 178.00 10 /01TAXI SRVC -45 TRIPS 261.40 11 /01TAXI SRVC -75 TRIPS 439.00 700.40 210 SERIES VERTICAL FILE 901.37 PLATE ENGRAVING -ADLT SPRT 11.77 AVCP ELECTRICAL SRVC 11.98 AVCP PARK UTILITIES 68.91 AVCP PHASE II 11.21 92.10 SUPERVISION BASICS SERIES 350.00 11 /2TAIT & ASSOC -PUB HEAR 93.94 11 /16WEST POINTE HEARING 133.98 11 /130RDINANCE #274 46.20 11 /8NOTICE OF HEARING 237.16 11 /19WEST POINTE- HEARING 113.19 624.47 HACKSAW BLADES 10.65 PAGER BATTERIES 11.20 21.85 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108154 1101 01/09/02 2065 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES 9208 108154 1101 01/09/02 2065 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES 9208 TOTAL CHECK 108155 1101 01/09/02 2655 WILL, SHAWNA 9244 108156 1101 01/09/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 108156 1101 01/09/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 108156 1101 01/09/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 TOTAL CHECK TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 0 /W W RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:17:08 PAGE 4 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 02 THOMAS GUIDE 29.13 PW TRUCK DIVIDER TRAY 34.25 63.38 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 11 /17- 12 /17COMPUTER ROOM 150.82 11 /17- 12 /17ADMIN COPIES 118.45 11 /17- 12 /17ANNEX COPIES 67.88 337.15 11,499.02 11,499.02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 814.05 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 4,502.45 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 19.68 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 180.70 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 424.58 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 154.89 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 757.82 2605 GAS TAX 1,137.77 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 50.00 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 500.00 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 1,393.99 5001 SOLID WASTE AD939 178.00 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 300.00 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 247.17 6213 LEVY COMPANY 730.08 6531 TAIT & ASSOCIATES 93.94 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 13.90 TOTAL REPORT 11,499.02 C O c N RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:17:13 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 AMOUNT 12 /01PARKS CELLPHONE 30.42 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 12 /01MPK PD CELLPHONES 591.03 CHECK REGISTER 35.08 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 12 /01H RILEY CELLPHONE 43.94 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 108157 1101 01/16/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 TOTAL CHECK 108158 1101 01/16/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 108158 1101 01/16/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 TOTAL CHECK 108159 1101 01/16/02 2941 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 9504 108159 1101 01/16/02 2941 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 9504 TOTAL CHECK 108160 1101 01/16/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2734 108160 1101 01/16/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 3806 108160 1101 01/16/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2751 TOTAL CHECK 108161 1101 01/16/02 1100 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 9233 108161 1101 01/16/02 1100 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 9233 108161 1101 01/16/02 1100 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 9233 108161 1101 01/16/02 1100 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS 9233 TOTAL CHECK 108162 1101 01/16/02 1788 CANTWELL, ALICE A 9160 108163 1101 01/16/02 1142 COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURC 9212 108164 1101 01/16/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 108165 1101 01/16/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 9640 108165 1101 01/16/02 1200 E & M CONSTRUCTORS CO. 9640 TOTAL CHECK 108166 1101 01/16/02 2530 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN 9103 ^ 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 9420 108167 108167 1101 1101 01/16/02 01/16/02 1428 1428 PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 ® 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 9420 108167 108167 1101 01101 01/16/02 01/16/02 1428 1428 PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:42:38 PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 12 /01PARKS CELLPHONE 30.42 12 /010EO RILEY CELLPHONE 13.17 12 /01TRAFFENSTEDT CELLPHO 16.36 12 /01MPK PD CELLPHONES 591.03 12 /01SHIGLEY CELLPHONE 35.08 12 /01GILBERT CELLPHONE 21.82 12 /01H RILEY CELLPHONE 43.94 12 /01CHUDOBA CELLPHONE 16.36 12 /01LINDLEY CELLPHONE 43.63 12 /01MPK PD CELLPHONES 297.22 12 /01MAYOR CELLPHONE 45.80 12 /01MPK PD ACTIVATION 82.14 12 /01KUENY CELLPHONE 44.73 12 /01LOFTUS CELLPHONE 35.36 12 /01MORGENSTERN CELLPHON 29.09 1,346.15 SZABO -WEEK END 12/14 -26.7 601.88 SZABO -WEEK END 12/21 -32HR 720.00 1,321.88 MERCURY VAPOR ANALYZER 5,361.72 ANALYZER SHIPPING 49.69 5,411.41 • PAC PLAN #11 ADMIN FEE 1,749.39 • PAC PLAN #11 ADMIN REV - 1,749.39 10/24 -11 /9N PAC PLAN #11 11,662.63 11,662.63 02/03 PROPERTY INSURANCE 6,036.00 01 CHANGES&ADMIN FEES 5,236.00 02/03 AUTOMOBILE DAMAGE 5,327.00 02/03 EARTHQUAKE &FLOOD 42,958.00 59,557.00 AWAY WE GROW PRESCHOOL 1,536.00 1/02 -6/02 CHP LEASE 10,674.96 3PK OEM OFFICE,LABTEC SPI 1,129.61 TIERRA REJADA PARKWAY 19,225.00 PYMT #1 RETENTION - 1,922.50 17,302.50 12 /01GRAVES ACCT SRVC -105 6,857.50 12 /01SR CTR PHONE 14.94 12 /01EMERGENCY MGNT PHONE 143.28 12 /01POINDEXTER PRK PAYPH 59.84 12 /01FINANCE PHONE 35.59 12 /01COMM SRVC PHONE 33.31 12 /01CITYWIDE PHONE 1,449.18 12 /01CITY MGR PHONE 31.95 12 /01VECTOR PHONE 37.09 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 AMOUNT 12 /01CITY CLERK PHONE 20.46 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 12 /01ST MAINT PHONE CHECK REGISTER 12 /01CAMPUS PARK PAYPHONE FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 59.84 12 /01GLENWOOD PARK PAYPHO CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 108167 1101 01/16/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 299.00 TOTAL CHECK 5,612.00 12 /01CIVIC /COM CTR 525.00 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 1'�P168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 108168 1101 01/16/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9103 TOTAL CHECK 108169 1101 01/16/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 108170 1101 01/16/02 2354 PARKING COMPANY OF AMERIC 9102 108171 1101 01/16/02 2955 RAMIREZ, RICARDO 9285 108172 1101 01/16/02 2955 RAMIREZ, RICARDO 9285 108173 1101 01/16/02 2820 SCE 9413 108174 1101 01/16/02 1501 SECURITY ABOVE 9102 108175 1101 01/16/02 2915 STALKER RADAR 9504 108175 1101 01/16/02 2915 STALKER RADAR 9504 TOTAL CHECK 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9254 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9254 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 G 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:42:39 PAGE 2 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 12 /01CITY CLERK PHONE 20.46 12 /01COMM CTR PAYPHONE 54.00 12 /01MPK PD PHONE 14.63 12 /01ST MAINT PHONE 47.11 12 /01CAMPUS PARK PAYPHONE 59.84 12 /01CMPS CYN PARK PAYPHO 59.84 12 /01GLENWOOD PARK PAYPHO 59.84 12 /01MILLER PARK PAYPHONE 59.84 12 /01RECREATION PHONE 95.57 12 /01VISTA BUS MODEM 14.92 2,291.23 12 /01MGNT SRVCS 1,960.00 11 /01 HIGH ST PROJECT SRV 4,060.00 11 /01MGNT SRVCS 1,960.00 PROPERTY MGNT SET -UP 2,240.00 11 /01VALLEY COMPUTER SRVC 61.00 11 /01 PRC ADMIN FEES 18.30 12 /01VALLEY COMPUTER SRVC 61.00 10,360.30 12 /01CITY RTE & TR SWEEPI 6,186.02 11 /01MPK BUS SRVC & MAINT 12,227.26 DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE 27,500.00 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EXPENS 1,100.00 1 /02PREVIOUSLY NOT BILLED 1,551.79 12 /01METROLINK GUARD SRVC 2,066.40 FREIGHT CHARGES - LIDAR -B 16.05 QUOTE #1 -R9JA LIDAR -B 3,449.70 3,465.75 12 /01MONTE VISTA PARK 326.00 12 /01GRIFFIN PARK 1,208.00 12 /01COUNTRY TRAIL PARK 1,680.00 12 /01MTN MEADOWS PARK 2,468.00 12 /01TIERRA REJADA PARK 2,520.00 12/01 661 MPK AVENUE 42.00 12/01 18 HIGH STREET 68.00 12/01Z4 WMS RCH PRKWYS 268.00 12 /01VIRGINIA COLONY PRK 315.00 12 /01PARKWAYS & MEDIANS 5,491.00 12 /01POINDEXTER PARK 735.00 12 /01METROLINK STATION 299.00 12 /01AV PRK & PED BRIDGE 5,612.00 12 /01CIVIC /COM CTR 525.00 12 /01COM CTR PARK 194.00 12 /01Z10 MTN MEADOWS COMT 7,824.00 12 /01COLMER ALYSSAS CT 32.00 12/01Z8 HOME ACRES BUFFER 315.00 12/01Z7 MPK SQ IND PK 420.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 1,149.00 12 /01CAMPUS PARK 803.00 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 12 /01Z1 PECAN,BAMBI,BENWO 84.00 CHECK REGISTER 53.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 49.00 12/0122 SPRING,CHR BAR,TR CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 108176 1101 01/16/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 TOTAL CHECK 108177 1101 01/16/02 2869 TDS ENGINEERING, CORP. 2102 108177 1101 01/16/02 2869 TDS ENGINEERING, CORP. 9253 108177 1101 01/16/02 2869 IDS ENGINEERING, CORP. 9253 TOTAL CHECK 108178 1101 01/16/02 2869 TDS ENGINEERING, CORP. 2102 108179 1101 01/16/02 1572 THE PLANNING CORPORATION 9601 108180 1101 01/16/02 2289 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE /ASCOM 9231 108181 1101 01/16/02 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9103 108181 1101 01/16/02 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 108181 1101 01/16/02 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 108181 1101 01/16/02 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 108181 1101 01/16/02 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 TOTAL CHECK 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 108182 1101 01/16/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 TOTAL CHECK 108183 1101 01/16/02 1787 WILLIS, PAMELA S 9160 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 0 I a RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:42:39 N Z PAGE 3 -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 12/01Z5 PCH HILL TO TR 1,149.00 12 /01CAMPUS PARK 803.00 12 /01CAMPUS CYN PARK 2,520.00 12 /01PEACH HILL PARK 2,520.00 12 /01Z1 PECAN,BAMBI,BENWO 84.00 12/0129 MPK BUS CTR PLNTR 53.00 12/01Z3 PEPRL,BTR CRK PLT 137.00 12/01Z6 GLENHAVEN W END 49.00 12/0122 SPRING,CHR BAR,TR 2,468.00 12 /01MILLER PARK 735.00 12 /01GLENWOOD PARK 1,018.00 12 /01VILLA CAMPESINA PARK 284.00 42,162.00 PMT #423MP -2 RETENTION - 574.14 BATTERY BACK -UP SYSTEM PR 5,468.02 CONTINGENCY (5 %) 273.42 5,167.30 BATTERY BACK -UP RETENTION 5,800.34 9- 12 /01LA AVE RD WIDENING 3,737.00 CITY HALL POSTAGE METER 3,000.00 11 /01PW SRVCS 600.00 11 /01MRA /ECO SRVCS 3,120.00 11 /01MRA SRVCS 780.00 11 /01FINANCE SRVCS 9,475.00 11 /01CDBG SRVCS 1,500.00 15,475.00 10 /9- 12 /11ZONE 10 5,324.62 10 /9- 12 /11AVRC & GYM 328.92 10 /9- 12 /11ZONE 4 78.84 10 /9- 12 /11PRKWYS & MEDIAN 427.55 10 /9- 12 /11MTN MEADOWS 1,099.29 10 /9- 12 /11ZONE 5 423.04 10 /9- 12 /11ZONE 8 256.52 10 /9- 12 /11TIERRA REJADA 467.24 10 /9- 12 /11COUNTRY TRAIL 1,337.50 9,743.52 AWAY WE GROW PRESCHOOL 1,152.00 269,785.55 269,785.55 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 01/09/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 65,135.79 1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 27,678.68 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 1,700.86 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 5,918.55 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 84.00 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 19,770.50 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 137.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 346.84 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 1,572.04 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 49.00 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 420.00 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 571.52 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 53.00 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 13,148.62 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 32.00 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 28,052.36 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 3,737.00 2605 GAS TAX 17,851.68 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 3,762.97 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 1,500.00 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 39,740.30 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 13,904.96 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 14,607.58 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 13,412.02 TOTAL REPORT 269,785.55 r� W ® RUN DATE 01/09/02 TIME 12:42:43 ci PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM /. 4f. TO: Honorable City Council u� FROM: Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Dir4o�Y DATE: December 27, 2001 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Use of Funds received pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding with Hidden Creek Ranch LP, North Park Village LP, and Messenger Investment Company BACKGROUND On December 10, 2001, the City of Moorpark entered into an agreement with North Park Village LP, Hidden Creek LP and the Messenger Investment Company concerning development plans for their property. This Memorandum of Understanding requires the developer to pay to the City $183,156 in full satisfaction of legal and staff costs incurred previously on behalf of the developers. DISCUSSION Of the amount paid, $33,156 will reimburse the City for legal services paid by the City through September and $20,000 will reimburse the City for staff time spent directly on the project in the last several years. The remaining $130,000 will cover costs incurred by the City in conjunction with the General Plan update and Sphere of Influence study that concluded in 1992 and carrying costs since that time. Actual unreimbursed costs as of 1992 were approximately $104,000, which included $78,000 for the General Plan update and $26,000 for the Sphere of Influence study. In 1998, the developer agreed to reimburse the City $130,000 for these studies as part of the now defunct Development Agreement between Messenger Investment Company and the City. Costs for the Sphere of Influence study and General Plan update were paid with city discretionary funds, and thus this 000304 Honorable City Council December 28, 2001 Page 2 reimbursement may be allocated at the Council's discretion. Staff recommends that the $130,000 be deposited into the City Hall Improvement Fund to use during design and construction of new City Hall facilities. The new police and yard facilities currently being planned already have sufficient funding sources identified. Other potential uses include depositing the funds directly to the General Fund, Endowment Fund, or Community Development Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to deposit $130,000 of funds received pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding into the City Hall Improvement Fund. 000305 ISM I /. D. of NI r . %iCj� C T T1': , AFF MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL , r e.('.L�rn rY► o.� ui,^i� ��)_..__ _ .- __._..._ AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council PV. G � FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City Clerk and cJ� Acting Director of Community Development DATE: January 4, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing City Manager to Approve a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc., for the Scanning of City Records to Digital /Electronic Image in the Questys Software Format BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Currently the City Clerk's Department scans various City records (including but not limited to City Council approved minutes, resolutions, and ordinances and all recorded documents) into the City's electronic imaging system (Questys software) for permanent file retention. At the time of the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year Budget adoption, staff had proposed the scanning of all of the building permit files as well as Planning Commission minutes and resolutions into the City's electronic imaging system through the use of a qualified consultant. The City Council approved the estimated funds for this work with the adoption of the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year Budget. Staff subsequently researched qualified consultants and is proposing that a Professional Services Agreement with California CD Creations, Inc. be approved. This company is well qualified and has been certified by Decision Management Company, the Questys software provider, to scan the City records into the Questys software format. The proposed draft Professional Services Agreement is attached to this report. Regarding building permit records, staff's intent is that all existing building permit files (including paper copies of permits and plan sheets and microfiche files) be scanned. A subsequent follow -up action will need to be the establishment of a fee to be paid at the time of building permit application that will cover the cost of scanning all future building permit files. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to approve the Agreement between the City and California CD Creations, Inc. Attachment: Draft Professional Services Agreement 0013306 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MOORPARK AND CALIFORNIA CD CREATIONS SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2002, by and between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation located in the County of Ventura, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and California CD Creations, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT ". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, City has the need for qualified company to scan City records to digital /electronic image in the Questys software format and input the computer files directly into the Questys software; and WHEREAS, City desires to contract for such services with a private consultant in anticipation that said private consultant can provide such services in a manner acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, Consultant is experienced in providing such services; has the proper certifications and background to carry out the duties involved; and has a partnership arrangement with Decision Management Company, the Questys software provider. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. SERVICES City does hereby retain Consultant in a contractual capacity, on an as needed basis, to scan City records to digital /electronic image in the Questys software format. II. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his /her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein and as described in each separate work task proposal submitted to City in compliance with this Agreement. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. III. COSTS AND PAYMENT Consultant shall provide City with a written cost quotation for each specific work task requested by City to be completed by Consultant, and shall not proceed until written approval is granted by the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. The written price quote from Consultant for each work task shall include the description of the records to be scanned, the Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. P�0307 quantity (may be an estimated quantity), unit cost (per page and /or plan sheet), and any preparation cost for removal of staples and paperclips. The written price quote shall also specifically identify whether document pick up and delivery is included and the number of fields for indexing that will be provided (three fields to be provided at no additional cost). Payment by City to Consultant shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article V, Paragraph J, of this Agreement. The cost for scanning Planning Commission and Building Permit records shall not exceed the unit cost amounts listed in Attachments 1 and 2 (Price Quotes) to this Agreement. Consultant herein agrees that there will be no document pick up, delivery, or travel - related costs associated with the Planning Commission and Building Permit scanning work tasks referenced in Attachments 1 and 2 to this Agreement. Where said Attachments 1 and 2 are modified by this Agreement, or in the event there is a conflict between the provisions of said Attachments and this Agreement, the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence. IV. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION This Agreement may be terminated or suspended with or without cause by City at any time with no less than ten (10) working days written notice of such termination or suspension. Consultant may terminate this Agreement only by providing City with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of such termination. In the event of such termination or suspension, Consultant shall be compensated for services completed up to the date of termination or suspension. V. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage or other compensation to any person employed by Consultant performing services hereunder for City. B. Consultant is, and shall at all times, remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City, nor any of its officers, employees, servants or agents, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or of Consultants officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner employees of City. C. Within one week of: 1) termination of this Agreement, or 2) conclusion of all work, all original City records in Consultant's possession shall be delivered by Consultant to City. D. Consultant shall be required to obtain the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk's written approval for each set of records to be taken from City facilities to the Consultant's place of business for scanning purposes, and shall provide the City Clerk with a written description of the records to be taken, including number of pages and plan sheets. Consultant agrees to return any City records to the Assistant to City Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 2 000308 Manager /City Clerk within thirty -six hours of receipt of a written request from the City Clerk's Department (includes any e -mail request). City records shall not be kept at the Consultant's worksite for longer than 30 days unless additional written authorization is received from the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. E. Consultant shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend City and its officers, employees, servants and agents and independent contractors who serve in the role of City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, Director of Community Development, City Engineer, or City Attorney from any claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, resulting from, or in any way connected with the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or City, except such damage as is caused by the sole negligence of City. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against Consultant by reason of Paragraph E, hereof, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless or whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described in Paragraph E hereof. F. Consultant shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement the policies of insurance required by this paragraph and shall furnish to the City Clerk certificates of said insurance on or before the commencement of the term of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policies shall be in conformance with the requirements set forth below: 1. Consultant agrees to insure CITY and its officers, employees, servants and agents while acting within the scope of duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement, including any claims by City against Consultant for destruction or loss of original records provided to Consultant for the purpose of scanning City records to digital /electronic image in the Questys software format. 2. Consultant shall provide Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office "Commercial General Liability" policy form CG 00 01 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. 3. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 3 0003+09 additional insureds CITY, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 11 85. 4. Consultant agrees to provide Business Automobile Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less than $1,000,000 per accident. If CONTRACTOR owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non -owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR's employees will use personal automobiles in any way in performance of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall provide evidence of personal automobile liability coverage for each such person. 5. Consultant shall comply with Section 3800 of the Labor Code by securing, paying for, and maintaining in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, complete Worker's Compensation Insurance, and shall furnish a Certificate of Insurance to CITY before execution of this Agreement by CITY. The City and its officers, employees, servants, or agents, shall not be responsible for any claims in law or equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 6. Consultant agrees that the insurance required by this Agreement shall bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of cancellation or amendment of such policy for any reason whatsoever, City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. Consultant shall give City thirty (30) days written notice prior to the expiration of such policy. G. Consultant shall provide evidence of a $1,000,000 bond, prior to initiation of work under this Agreement, as surety for destruction or loss of original City records provided to Consultant for the purpose of scanning City records to digital /electronic image in the Questys software format; or herein agrees to pay to City a penalty fee of $1,000 per page or plan sheet for any City document destroyed or lost by Consultant in the performance of the work authorized by this Agreement, including transportation to and from the Consultant's place of business. H. Consultant shall not assign this Agreement, or any of the rights, duties or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that Consultant is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this Agreement. I. The language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence over the language contained in any exhibit to this Agreement. J. Payment to Consultant shall be made by City within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice for completed scanning work, if the invoice is not contested or questioned by City. If City identifies a discrepancy Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 4 000314 between the invoice amount and the work tasks or products completed, City shall within fifteen (15) workdays of receipt of the invoice specify in writing the discrepancy. Consultant shall then either: 1) provide support materials to satisfy City stated discrepancy, or 2) revise the invoice to reflect stated discrepancy. City shall then pay the revised or documented invoice within thirty (30) days of such revision or documentation. Each Consultant invoice must show details of work task completed, including the description of the records scanned, the quantity, unit cost (per page or plan sheet), any preparation cost for removal of staples and paperclips, and any document pick up or delivery charge, if applicable. K. City shall have the right to audit and inspect all payment and expense related books and records kept by Consultant and any subcontractors in connection with the operation and services performed under this Agreement. Notification of audit shall be provided at least 30 days before any such audit is conducted. L. Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City Clerk City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 To: Michael Friedman California CD Imaging Center 14125 Telephone Ave. No. 14 Chino, CA 91710 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address or contact person, which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after deposit in the United States mail. M. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed or represented by City or Consultant or by any third person to create the relationship of principal or agent, or of a partnership, or of a joint venture, or of any other association of any kind or nature between City and Consultant. N. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understanding, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. O. Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 0315 the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. P. No waiver of any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provisions. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. Q. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. R. Cases involving a dispute between City and Consultant may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgment of the arbitrator. S. This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. T. The captions and headings of the various Articles, Paragraphs, and Attachments of this Agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles, Paragraphs, and Attachments hereof. VI. RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL The individual directly responsible for Consultant overall performance of the Agreement provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between City and Consultant shall be Michael Friedman and no other individual may be substituted. The City's contact person in charge of administration of this Agreement, and to serve as principal liaison between Consultant and City, shall be the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 6 00031.; VII. IMPLEMENTATION City shall provide Consultant with written notice in advance of the date at which these services are to be implemented. CITY OF MOORPARK: Steven Kueny City Manager ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachments: CALIFORNIA CD CREATIONS, INC.: Michael Friedman President 1. Price Quote dated April 6, 2001, for Building Permit Records 2. Price Quote dated August 20, 2001, for Planning Commission Records Professional Services Agreement between City of Moorpark and California CD Creations, Inc. Page 7 000 313 FROM : Calif'oria CD Imaging Center FAX NO. : 909 364 0862 Apr. 06 2001 08:56AM P1 14125 Telephone Ave.. #14 Chino, CA 91710 (909) 590 -9842 fax (909) 364 -0862 CALIFORNIA IMAGING C E N T E R Fax To: Deborah Traffenstedt / Blanca Garza From: Michael Friedman Fam 805 - 529 -8270 Pages: 2 Phone: 805- 517 -6213 Date: 04/06/01 Re: Scanning quote to Questys CC: 0 Urgent ❑ For Review Q Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle • Comments: If you have any problems receiving or viewing this fax, please call (909) 590-9842. 000314 FROM : Califoria CD Imaging Center FAX NO. : 909 364 0862 Apr. 06 2001 08:57AM P2 CALIF0 R NI A I M A G I N C= C: E N T F:. R. April 6, 2001 14125 Telephone Ave., #14 Chino, CA 91710 (909) 590 -9842 fax (909) 364.0862 Scanning Price Quote The following is a price quote to scan the Building Planning Dept. records to digital image IN the Questys format. We will provide up to three fields for indexing with these prices. There will be a per page (image) cost and then multiplied by an estimated total page count If the city has a more exact count for pages, they may use our per page cost to figure out a more exact estimated total cost for the conversion. The quote is broken down into three categories: maps, permits and microfiche conversion. Cost Breakdown Quantity `Description Unit Cost Total Cost 150,000 Permits scanned $0.11 $16,500.00 150,000 permits prepped $0 -01 $1,500.00 25,000 Maps scanned $1 -38 $34,500.00 6,0001 microfiche images converted $0.18 $1,080.00 12 CDs $30 -00 $360.00 _ subtotal $53,940.00 tax $25.20 w T Estimated Total $53,965.20 The price includes document pick up and delivery. The prep charge is for removing staples, paperclips, etc... Again, please remember that these are estimated page counts and the actual page count may vary. You will be charged only for actual number of pages (images) converted. Price quote valid for 90 days. Michael Friedman President 0003:1S CAI,IFORNIA 14125 Telephone Ave., #14 Chino. CA 91710 (909) 590 -9842 fax (909) 364.0862 I 1`1 A G [ N G C E N I' 4_; R August 20, 2001 Quote for Questys Scanning This quote is to scan the minutes and resolutions in the books to digital image to be used in Questys. We will scan the documents, create the Questys bibliographies and store them on CD for transfer and back up. We estimate 60 books at 200 pages per book. That's 12,000 pages. One to two CDs. Quantity Description Amount Total 12,000 pages scanned 2 CDs $0.08 $960.00 $30.00 $60.00 tax $4.20 TOTAL $1,024.20 This estimate is for us to pick up the documents and scan them at our facility. We estimate it to take 5 days. Some options are: OCR On -site scanning If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Michael Friedman President $0.05 per page $125 per day, per machine (estimated on- site scanning time - 10 days) ATTACHM ENT 006316 TO: .6u DATE: CITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council ITEM /1. & —rl A BY: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works January 4, 2002 (Council Meeting 1- 16 -02) SUBJECT: Adjustment to the Hourly Rates Charged for Engineering Services. OVERVIEW This requests approval of a 2.7% increase to the rates charged by the consultant City Engineer for engineering services. DISCUSSION A. Background: In March of 1991 the City entered into an Agreement for City Engineering Services with Charles Abbott Associates. B. Retainer 1. Agreement: Paragraphs A & B of Section I of the Agreement provide for an automatic adjustment (not to exceed 7 %) to the retainer for City Engineer and Traffic Engineering Services, to occur on December 1 of each year, based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index. 2. Last Adjustment: The last adjustment to the Retainer amounts was made December 2000. 3. CPI Increase 2001: There has been a 2.7% increase in the CPI [ "U. S. City Average for All Urban Consumers All Items Indexes "] during the one -year period ending August 2001. Using that 2.7% inflation factor, changes to the existing amounts for the Engineering retainers are summarized as follows: Current Service Amount ($) City Engineer 2,708 Traffic Engineer 427 Revised Amnt. ($) Effective 11 -1 -99 2,781 439 Engfee0l 00032.'t Rates for Engineering Services January 4, 2002 Page 2 4. No Action Required: As stated above, this is an automatic increase. No City Council action is necessary. C. Request for Adjustment to Hourly Rates for Services 1. Agreement: The Agreement for Engineering Services also states that the City may consider a request for a Cost -of- Living Adjustment to the hourly rates charged for Engineering Services. 2. Past Years: It has been the practice of the City Council in past years to approve the consultant City Engineer's request for an adjustment to the hourly rates for engineering services, based upon the same CPI increase data used to adjust the amount of the Retainers. 3. Request for Increase: Attached as Exhibit 1 is a letter (12- 11 -01) requesting an increase to the hourly rates charged for engineering services. The amount of the requested increase is 2.7% -- the same amount as the automatic increase to the retainer fees. 4. Request for Retroactive Approval: The attached request (Exhibit 1) asks that the increases to the rates for engineering services be made effective retroactively to December 1, 2001. 5. Prior Change to Agreement re: Annual Adjustments: In the past, the Engineering Services Agreement called for the annual adjustments to occur on first day of November of each year. Practice showed that it was difficult to gather the required information and present the request to the City Council prior to that November 1 date. Often the request was made after November 1, for a "RETROACTIVE" adjustment. In order to avoid retroactive adjustments in the future, the Agreement was revised to call for the adjustments to the retainer and the engineering fee rates, to be made on December 1 of each year. 6. Recommended Effective Date for Rate Adjustment: The request for the rate adjustment, with the required supportive information, could have been submitted to the City in October so that the City Council could consider the request prior to the requested December 1 effective date. The request (Exhibit 1) was not received until December 11, 2001. It is recommended, therefore, that the requested rate adjustment be made effective January 1, 2002. D. Follow -up Administrative Actions If the requested increase to the hourly rates for services is approved, an Amendment to the Engineering Services Agreement effecting this change will be executed by the City Manager. Engfee0l 000318 Rates for Engineering Services January 4, 2002 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Approve a 2.7% increase to the rates charged for Engineering Services, effective January 1, 2002. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Request 000319 Engfee0l C 0 -4, A - iII LD!Nt. ,�', S FET1'i 1'NG I N FER.1NU/ IN FRA 7'R UG'('URh' Ir1fJ 1Gciri tr:'i December 11, 2001 Steven Kueny, City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark CA, 93021 Dear Steve, As outlined by provisions in our contract for Engineering Services to the City of Moorpark dated March 1, 1991 and modified on October 20, 1999, we will be increasing our retainer fees and fee rates to keep pace with Consumer Price Index (CPI). I have attached a copy of the CPI for the period August 2000 through August 2001. The increase in the CPI for "U.S. Cities Average for All Urban Consumers" during the period has been 2.7 %. This is the index specified in our contract with the City. Our rates will be increased by 2.7% and the increase will take effect December 1, 2001. I have attached Exhibits `A' and `B' that show the retainer fees and hourly rates, respectively, that will take effect on December 1. I have also attached, as Exhibit `C', a copy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI printout for August 2000 to August 2001. It shows the increase in the CPI for "U.S. Cities Average for All Urban Consumers ". We look forward to working with you and City staff to provide service to the community of Moorpark in the coming years. Sincerely, ,.If Alp"� Walter Brown. City Engineer c: Wayne Loftus, Community Development Director Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director Debbie Traffenstedt, City Clerk & Acting Community Development Director Ron Hamilton, CAA Diana Blunt, CAA Project file, Engineering Fees Chron Encl: Exhibit `A', Retainer Fees Exhibit `B', Hourly Rates Exhibit `C' BLS, CPI August 2001 000320 Charles Abbott Associates City of Moorpark EXHIBIT 'A' December 1, 2000 Retainer Fees Adjustments City Engineering Contract Service Item Nov -00 Monthly Fee 00 to 01 CPI * Change Dec -01 Monthly Fee I. A. General Services Retainer $2,708 2.70% $2,781 I.B. Traffic Engineering Retainer $427 2.70% $439 I.C. Plan and Map Checking See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.D. Land Development Review See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.E. Encroachment Permits See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.F. Land Development Inspection See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.G. C.I.P. Projects /Misc. Projects See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.H. Services by Others See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 2.70% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates * U.S. Cities Average (1967 = 100), Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers C CJ Charles Abbott Associates City of Moorpark EXHIBIT 'B' February 1, 2002 Hourly Rate Adjustments Classification 2000 Hourly Rates CPI ** Increase 2001 Hourly Rates Principal $136 2.70% $140 Project Supervisor $109 2.70% $112 Project Manager $95 2.70% $98 Senior Engineer $103 2.70% $106 Traffic Engineer $90 2.70% $92 Civil Engineer $90 2.70% $92 Associate Civil Engineer $80 2.70% $82 Assistant Civil Engineer $64 2.70% $66 Designer $77 2.70% $79 Senior Draftsman $52 2.70% $53 Draftsman $41 2.70% $42 Engineering Technician $43 2.70% $44 Construction Administrator $103 2.70% $106 Construction Inspector $65 2.70% $67 Building Official $90 2.70% $92 Senior Building Inspector $72 2.70% $74 Building Inspector $62 2.70% $64 Permit Technician $55 2.70% $56 2 - Person Survey Crew $171 2.70% $176 3 - Person Survey Crew $217 2.70% $223 Secretarial /Word Processor $38 2.70% $39 * Hourly rates shown are rounded to the nearest one dollar ** U.S. Cities Average (1967 = 100), Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers 000322 TO: FROM: DATE: Y��(`w►�n m����fy.�t E1�1 . Moorpark City Counci AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council John Brand, Senior Management Analyst C January 3, 2002 (CC meeting of January 16, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider an Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE for Regular Monthly Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Event Participation. SUMMARY If approved, this Agreement (see Attachment A) would allow Moorpark residents and small businesses to go to Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) events at MSE Environmental, Inc in Camarillo in addition to the monthly HHW events in Simi Valley. The MSE HHW events are held at their facility at 880 West Verdulera Street in Camarillo on the second Friday and Saturday of each month. The City of Camarillo will coordinate the billing and pass through the actual cost of Moorpark's residential participation. BACKGROUND Currently, residents of the City of Moorpark can participate in monthly Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) events held in Simi Valley. The events in Simi Valley are held on the third Saturday of the month. Until September of this year, Moorpark residents could also attend HHW events in Thousand Oaks. Certain materials, such as paints, pesticides, solvents, and other household chemicals may harm the environment and are prohibited from the regular solid waste collection system and the Simi Valley Landfill and Recycling center. On average, about thirty Moorpark residents participate in the monthly events in Simi Valley. The City of Thousand Oaks recently withdrew from a regional Memorandum of Agreement that had previously enabled Moorpark residents to attend HHW events in that City. On September 5, the City Council declined to enter into a new Agreement with Thousand Oaks and directed staff to investigate other HHW disposal 000323 HHW Facility CC Meeting of December 19, 2001 Page 2 opportunities. DISCUSSION This Agreement would give Moorpark residents two additional days each month when they can dispose of HHW materials. The MSE Environmental events in Camarillo are held on the second Friday and Saturday of each month. The cost, about $72.00 per participant, is similar to those at the Simi Valley events. Some residents may find the Friday schedule more convenient. This Agreement is consistent with the previous agreements entered into by the cities and the county for HHW services. It is identical to the one MSE Environmental has with the current participating jurisdictions: the cities of Camarillo, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, and the county of Ventura. The term of the Agreement is to June 30, 2002. The participating jurisdictions will develop a new Agreement this spring. In addition, the MSE Environmental HHW events accept small business HHW for a fee. This is consistent with the City's AB 939 objective of allowing qualified small business participation at HHW events. Small business hazardous waste (by definition less certain limits generated per year) is called Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) service. Each year one or two qualifying Moorpark businesses request the opportunity to drop off their materials at an event. CESQG customers must pay for the disposal of their materials. The City pays for residential HHW disposal from the AB 939 collected from solid waste accounts. The only option for businesses large or small at this time is to contract directly with a facility or hazardous waste processor. Staff believes that the MSE Environmental HHW events in Camarillo will provide more comprehensive and more convenient HHW collection services to Moorpark residents at less cost to the City than staging events within the City. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE Environmental Inc. for provision of Regional Household and Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) Hazardous Waste Collection Program Services, subject to final language approval by the City Attorney and City Manager, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. 000324 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND MSE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., FOR PROVISION OF HOUSEHOLD AND CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY OF MOORPARK THIS AGREEMENT made this 19th day of December 2001, by and between the City of Moorpark, a general law City ( "CITY "), and MSE Environmental, Inc., a California corporation, ( "CONTRACTOR "). The CONTRACTOR and CITY, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS The words used in this Agreement shall have the following definitions, unless it is clear from the context that a different meaning is intended: A. CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS (CESQG) shall mean businesses, including businesses operated out of a house, which meet the criteria specified in §261.5 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. B. CESQG WASTE shall mean hazardous wastes as defined by Health & Safety Code, §25117 or listed in the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11 or that exhibit characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity described therein, which are generated by the CESQG. CESQG WASTE shall NOT include radioactive materials, explosives, or ammunition. C. EVENT shall mean all activities occurring on the days in which the CONTRACTOR provides HHW and/or CESQG WASTE collection programs at the permanent household hazardous waste collection facility ( "PHHWCF "). D. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTES (HHW) shall mean wastes discarded from residences that are either hazardous waste as defined by Health & Safety Code §25117 or wastes that are listed in the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11 or that exhibit characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity described therein. HHW may include, but are not limited to, common household products such as household cleaning products, spot removers, floor polish, furniture polish, aerosol cans, solvents, oven cleaner, pesticides, pool chemicals, nickel- cadmium, alkaline, carbon -zinc or other small batteries, intact spent fluorescent light tubes, intact spent high intensity discharge (HID) lamps, oil base paint, latex paint, used motor oil, used oil filters, antifreeze, and spent lead -acid batteries. HHW does NOT include radioactive materials, explosives /ammunition, or wastes produced in the course of operating a business, including a business concern at a residence. 000325 E. PARTICIPANTS shall mean all persons who bring HHW and/or CESQG WASTE to the permanent HHW collection facility. ARTICLE 2. THE SCOPE OF SERVICES The CONTRACTOR and the CITY shall complete the Scope of Services as specified and herein incorporated as EXHIBIT A: Section I. SCOPE OF SERVICES Section II. LIST OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTERS Section III. LIST OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES Section IV. RATE SCHEDULES Section V. HANDLING OF UNACCEPTABLE OR DANGEROUS MATERIAL Section VI. LIST OF EQUIPMENT The SCOPE OF SERVICES may be amended during the term of this Agreement by mutual consent of both the CONTRACTOR and CITY, expressed in writing. ARTICLE 3. COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION The term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2002 and, unless terminated pursuant to this Agreement, shall expire on June 30, 2002. Approval of this Agreement by the CITY does not obligate the CITY to use the services made available by the CONTRACTOR. CITY may limit participation by CITY residents and/or residents from other jurisdictions at any time during the term of this Agreement immediately upon notice to CONTRACTOR. ARTICLE 4. FUNDING 1. Not -to- Exceed Cost of services provided to the CITY by the CONTRACTOR during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $72.00 per vehicle calculated on a quarterly basis as delineated on the Rate Schedules provided in Exhibit A, Section IV. The CITY shall not be liable for variable costs which exceed the not -to- exceed per vehicle cost specified in Section IV. Costs for unacceptable wastes inadvertently accepted by the CONTRACTOR or deemed by the CONTRACTOR to create a public or environmental hazard if not accepted will not be subject to the $72.00 per vehicle cap and will be paid by the CITY at cost plus 10 percent as indicated in Exhibit A, Section IV. 2 010 0 326 2. Adjustment to Rate Schedules The CITY and the CONTRACTOR shall have the right to seek an adjustment to the Rate Schedules provided in Exhibit A, Section IV, if any one party can demonstrate that the rates for services have decreased or increased in an amount equal to or in excess of 10 percent. In such event, the party seeking an adjustment shall provide written notice, including justification for the cost adjustment, to the other party at least sixty (60) days in advance of the application of the proposed adjustment. Upon receipt of such notice, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR shall meet within ten (10) working days to negotiate the appropriate level of cost adjustments. In the event that the parties cannot agree on the appropriate level of cost adjustment, the CITY or the CONTRACTOR may terminate its participation in this Agreement by providing ten (10) working days notice to all parties. ARTICLE 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The following terms and conditions shall apply: CONTRACTOR Requirements The CONTRACTOR warrants that it possesses, or has arranged through subcontracts, all capital and other equipment, labor, and materials to carry out and complete the work hereunder in compliance with all federal, state, county, city, and special district laws, ordinances and regulations which are applicable. 2. Performance. In meeting CONTRACTOR'S obligations under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards of practice in existence at the time of performance. 3. Non -Assi ng ability The CONTRACTOR shall not assign, sell, hypothecate, lease, convey, or otherwise transfer or dispose of this Agreement, or its right, title or interest or its power to execute such an Agreement to any individual or business entity of any kind without the previous written consent of the CITY. Any attempt to assign, sell hypothecate, lease, convey, or otherwise transfer or dispose of this Agreement without written consent is in violation of this section and may cause termination of this Agreement without prior notice. 4. Work Delays Should the CONTRACTOR be obstructed or delayed in the work required to be done hereunder by changes in the Scope of Services or by any default, act or omission by the CITY, or by strikes, fire, earthquake, or any other Act of God, or by the inability to obtain materials, equipment, or labor due to federal government restrictions arising out of defense or war programs, then the time of completion at the CITY's sole option, may be 00032'7 extended for such periods as may be agreed upon by the CITY and the CONTRACTOR. Labor Actions In the event that the CONTRACTOR is experiencing a labor action at the time of the award of the contract (or if its suppliers or subcontractors are experiencing such a labor action), the CITY reserves the right to terminate this Agreement without prior notice. 6. CONTRACTOR'S Obligations The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the services and to perform everything required by this Agreement and Exhibit A. 7. Amendments Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing. Article 6 may not be waived by CONTRACTOR or CITY. 8. Termination Prior to Completion The CITY or the CONTRACTOR, upon ten (10) working days notice, may terminate any portion or all of the services agreed to be performed by the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. All compensation for actual work performed and charges outstanding at the time of termination shall be payable by the CITY to the CONTRACTOR following submission of a final invoice by the CONTRACTOR. 9. Faithful Performance Bond Requirement The CONTRACTOR shall execute this Agreement and furnish a surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $25,000, guaranteeing the faithful performance of this Agreement, which shall remain in force for the term of this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall provide this surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit no later than twenty (20) working days after the final execution of this Agreement by the CITY. All extensions of time, extra work, additional work, and any other changes authorized by these documents may be made without the consent of the surety. 10. Independent Contractor CONTRACTOR, for all purposes, shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and shall conduct its operations pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement in that said capacity. CONTRACTOR is an independent entity and not an officer, agent, servant, or employee of CITY. CONTRACTOR is solely responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors, if any. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint venture between CITY and CONTRACTOR. Neither CONTRACTOR nor its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors shall obtain any rights to retirement or other benefits which accrue to 4 000328 CITY employees. Officers, agents, and employees of CONTRACTOR shall not be considered employees or agents of the CITY, nor shall they have any power to bind the CITY. 11. Insurance Provisions Without limiting the CONTRACTOR'S indemnification of the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall, during the term of this Agreement, provide and maintain at its sole cost and expense the types of insurance specified subject to the following conditions: a. General Conditions - All insurance policies or endorsements, excluding Worker's Compensation, shall name the CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds. All insurance required shall be primary coverage as respect to the CITY, and any insurance or self - insurance maintained by the CITY shall be in excess of CONTRACTOR'S insurance coverage and shall not contribute to it. b. Cancellation or Reduction in Coverage - The CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall not be canceled, non - renewed, nor reduced in coverage or limits until after thirty (30) days written notice and shall have been sent by the issuing insurance company via certified mail (return receipt requested) to the CITY at the following locations, and shall contain an unequivocal clause so stating: City of Moorpark Community Services Department 799 N. Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: John Brand City Attorney City of Moorpark Burke, Williams & Sorensen 611 W. Sixth Street, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 If any changes in insurance coverage do not meet the minimum coverage outlined in subsection (g) below, this shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Workers' Compensation - CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain during the life of this Agreement, workers' compensation insurance for all its employees engaged on or at the site of the project; and in case any of the work is sublet, the CONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors to similarly provide workers' compensation insurance for all the latter's employees unless such employees are covered by protection afforded by workers' compensation insurance carried by the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR hereby warrants that it is aware of the provisions of §3700 et seq., of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation and that it will comply with this requirement. d. Aggregate Limits/Blanket Coverage - If any of the required insurance coverages contain aggregate limits, or apply to other operations or tenancy of the CONTRACTOR outside this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall give the 5 000329 CITY prompt written notice of any incident occurrence, claim, settlement or judgement against that insurance which may diminish the protection that such insurance affords the CITY. The CONTRACTOR further shall take immediate steps restoring such aggregate limits or shall provide other insurance protection for such aggregate limits. Failure to Maintain or to Procure Insurance - CONTRACTOR'S failure to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and the CITY may terminate this Agreement without prior notice or may procure or renew such insurance to protect its interests and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith and recover all monies so paid from the CONTRACTOR, or deduct all monies so paid from payments due the CONTRACTOR. f. Underlying Insurance - The CONTRACTOR shall require indemnification and insurance as it deems appropriate from its employees receiving mileage allowance, consultants, agents, and subcontractors, if any, to protect the CONTRACTOR'S and the CITY'S interests, and for ensuring that such persons comply with any applicable insurance statutes. g. Evidence of Coverage - The CONTRACTOR shall provide the following insurance documents to the City Clerk no later than ten (10) working days after the execution of this Agreement by the CITY: copies of insurance policies or endorsements for all required coverages, including additional insured endorsement; and thirty (30) days notice cancellation clause endorsement. Failure to provide these documents shall be a material breach and grounds for termination without prior notice or suspension of this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall have insurance with the following minimum limits: Type of Insurance Coverage Limits COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY $5,000,000 CSL (must be written on occurrence basis) $5, 000, 000 aggregate Includes personal injury, broad form property damage, products /completed operations, independent contractors, premises and operations, $50, 000 fire legal liability, and Environmental Impairment Liability coverage for sudden releases up to $5, 000, 000. CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY $5, 000, 000 CSL (must be written on an occurrence basis) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY $2, 000, 000 CSL (must be written on an occurrence basis) Includes bodily injury and property damage applicable to owned, non -owned and 6 000330 hired automobiles. Also includes uninsured /underinsured motorists coverage in the minimum amount of $100, 000. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Includes Employer's Liability POLL UTION LIABILITY/ PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY 12. Service Monitoring $1, 000, 000 statutory limits $2, 000, 000 CSL $S, 000, 000 aggregate The CITY shall have the right, but not the obligation, to review the work being performed by the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement at any time. Monitoring under this provision does not constitute approval of CONTRACTOR'S actions nor shall it relieve the CONTRACTOR of its responsibility for the thoroughness of the services to be provided hereunder. 13. Disposition of Purchased Equipment This Section left intentionally blank. 14. Anti- Discrimination In the performance of the terms of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR agrees not to engage in, nor permit subcontractors employed to engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of the age, disability or handicap, race, color, sex, familial status, national origin or ancestry, or religion of such persons. Violation of this provision may result in the imposition of penalties referred to in Labor Code § 1735. 15. Partiallnvalidity If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent juri sdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the other provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 16. Governing Law This Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the parties, shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for any actions to enforce the provisions of this Agreement shall be in the appropriate court located in either Ventura County or Los Angeles County, California. 17. Audit The CITY, upon three (3) days written notice, shall have the option of inspection and/or auditing all records and other written materials used by the CONTRACTOR directly 7 000331 relating to CONTRACTOR'S performance of services under this Agreement in preparing its invoices to the CITY as a condition precedent to any payment to the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR'S fee schedules for recycling/treatment /disposal services shall be the documents utilized for purposes of an audit of any waste management pricing under this Agreement. 18. INS Compliance CONTRACTOR warrants on behalf of itself and all subcontractors engaged for the performance of this Agreement that only persons authorized to work in the United States pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws shall be employed in the performance of the work hereunder. 19. Business Tax CONTRACTOR shall comply with business license and business tax regulations as required by the CITY. 20. Waiver or Breach Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition, or covenant, or breach of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant or breach of any other term condition, or covenant hereof. 21. Compliance with Laws The CONTRACTOR shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its Services pursuant to this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Moorpark Municipal Code, as it may be amended from time to time. 22. Conflict of Interest CONTRACTOR shall comply with all Conflict of Interest laws and regulation, including, but not limited to, the CITY's Conflict of Interest Code requirements. 23. Section Headings The Section headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall have no binding effect. 24. Assistance of Counsel Each party to this Agreement warrant to each other party as follows: 8 000332 a. That each party had or had available the assistance of counsel in the negotiation for, and execution of, this Agreement, and all related documents; and b. That each party has lawfully authorized the execution of this Agreement. 25. Public Record This Agreement is a public record. ARTICLE 6. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION The CONTRACTOR shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its present and future officers, elected officials, directors, officials, employees and agents, and subcontractors and assignees (referred to jointly in this section as "INDEMNITIES ") from and against any liability, penalties, fines, forfeitures, demands, claims, causes of actions, suits, remediation and cleanup costs, and costs and expenses of any sort (including cost of defense, settlement and attorney's fees) that any of the INDEMNITIES may hereinafter suffer, incur, be responsible for or pay out as a result of any injury of any sort including but not limited to bodily injuries or death to any person, injury to property, or damage to the environment or natural resources (including without limitation contamination, pollution, or other adverse effects), that arises out of or is in any way connected directly or indirectly with execution or performance of this Agreement or any part thereof, including, without limitations the handling or management of any FACILITY or related site or personnel or the collection, identification, handling, bulking, packaging, transport, disposal or recycling of HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE or any other waste of any type, or that arises out of or is any way connected directly or indirectly with the CONTRACTOR'S strict liability or any other form of strict liability whatsoever with respect to disposal or processing or recycling of HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE or any other waste of any type. Without limiting the foregoing, this indemnity shall include indemnification for any liability arising out of violation or alleged violation of any state or federal law, statute, ordinance, order, rule, or regulation of any government entity or agency and any liability of any sort under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act or any comparable provision of state or federal law that may be subsequently enacted or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. The indemnification provided in this section shall not include indemnification of a particular INDEMNITEE where that INDEMNITEE' S liability is based upon that INDEMNITEE's willful misconduct or active negligence and the CONTRACTOR is otherwise not at fault in any respect. ARTICLE 7. ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties to the subject of this Agreement and amends and supersedes all previous Agreements, promises, presentations, understanding and negotiations, whether written or oral, among the parties respect to the subject matter hereof. 9 000333 ARTICLE 8. PAYMENT PROCEDURES By mutual Agreement, all requests for payment will be processed through the City of Camarillo. Upon removal of all HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE collected by the CONTRACTOR from the PARTICIPANTS at the designated site, the CONTRACTOR shall submit an invoice to the CITY. Payment shall be made on presentation of invoice by the CONTRACTOR in accordance with the rate schedules provided in Exhibit A, section IV. The CONTRACTOR shall submit the following with the invoice: all appointment cards collected from PARTICIPANTS, number of PARTICIPANTS from within the CITY and number of PARTICIPANTS from other jurisdictions. Contractor shall provide quarterly reports documenting all collection activities to the City within 14 calendar days of the end of the quarter. The report at a minimum, shall include copies of manifests; proof of acceptance of all material collected at the site; a printout of the completed CIWMB Form 303; other charts, graphs and visual materials related to the work performed as the CITY may request. For all invoices submitted, the CITY shall accept or reject invoices within ten (10) working days after receipt of the invoice. If the CONTRACTOR receives no response within ten (10) days, the CONTRACTOR may assume that the invoice is accepted. The CITY reserves the right upon notification to the CONTRACTOR, to extend the invoice review period beyond ten (10) working days without penalties should the CITY determine that extensive review is required. If the invoice is rejected, CONTRACTOR shall resubmit invoice with correction. Payment for all invoices shall be made with the following provisions: The CITY payment terms are 30 days from the receipt and acceptance of an original invoice and acceptance of the materials, supplies, equipment or services (Net 30). Invoices shall be sent to: City of Camarillo Public Services Department P.O. Box 248 Camarillo, CA 93010 -0248 Attn: Rebecca Guay ARTICLE 9. NOTICES City of Camarillo Finance Department P.O. Box 248 Camarillo, CA 93010 -0248 Attn: Robert Brooks All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, by registered or certified mail addressed as follows: TO CITY OF MOORPARK: John Brand Senior Management Analyst City of Moorpark 799 N. Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 10 000334 TO CONTRACTOR: Frank W. Doerfler, Jr., President MSE Environmental, Inc. 880 West Verdulera Street Camarillo, CA 93010 The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective authorized representatives. ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk MSE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., a California Corporation: I� Moorpark AGR_01.doc CITY OF MOORPARK Patrick Hunter, Mayor 11 000335 OCT-24 -2001 14:57 FROM- T -133 P.002 /004 F -060 July 29, 1997 Mr, John Brand CITY OF MOORPARK 799 N. Moorpark Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Dear Mr. Brand; MSE ENVIRONMENTAL A Teri& LLC Company 880 W"I Verdulera Strcet Camarillo, Cry 93010 Tclephone (805) 987 -0217 Fax(805)987 -8718 MSE Environmental (MSE) is pleased to provide the attached proposed pricing for providing Temporary Household hazardous 'Waste Collection events for the City of Moorpark. As discussed, this proposal provides per unit pricing based on the type of material and it's disposal method. MSE proposes to invoice the City based on the net weight of the material shipped. Master drum lists will be provided to the City, which lists each drum, by a unique drum number, its gross weight, tare weight and net weight. In addition to the per pound disposal price, MSE proposes a fixed fee per car to cover the costs of labor and materials for operating the collection events. Please note that this proposal provides an average cost per car cap of $72/car, to be calculated on a quarterly basis_ Thus this proposal will not exceed the previously provided fixed fee of $72 /car. Additionally, we have provided a proposed disposal cost sheet for CESQG customers. These costs are also provided at a per unit price as well as a fixed fee per visit. We hope thi s optional pricing structure meets your needs. MSE looks forward to the opportunity to work with the City in providing HI-1W services. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call myself or Janice Oldemeyer at (805)987 -0217. Sincerely, MS.E ENVIRONMENTAL Santiago Speceiro HHW Program Manager Southem California Region Attachments Frtntea on RoryUdO Fair 0003.36 OCT -24 -2001 14:57 FROM- T-133 P.003/004 F -060 COMMUNITY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CESQG EVENT MOBILIZATION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING FEES Fixed Fees These costs include the labor and materials required co operate the HIM and CESQG events HHW Customers CESQG Customers $30 /car $35 /visit Disposal and Recycling These costs includes all labor, materials, transportation and disposal /recycling charges for the waste benerated. a.) Automotive Products for Recycle Antifreeze $1.50 /gal Used Motor Oil $0.50 /gal Used Oil Filters $0.75/lb Lead Acid Batteries NIC b.) Other Waste for Recycling Latex Paint $3.60 1gal $.36/lb * Household Batteries $1.10 /lb Fluorescent Light Tubes $0.20 /foot * Mercury $12.00 /lb Empty Drums $25 /drum c.) Waste for Fuels Blending Oil Base Paint $4.00 /gal Solvents $.40 /lb $2.50 /gal $.25/lb d.) Waste for Incineration Overpacks $1.25 /lb * Non- Reactive Labpacks $3.20/lb *Reactive Labpacks $7.20 /Ib * Aerosols $2.60 /lb PCB's $2.80 /lb Propane Cylinders (Camp Stove Type) $5.00 /each Propane Tanks (BBQ Type) $25.001Each Sharps $75.00/4 qt. cons. d.) Waste for Landfill * Asbestos $1.00 /lb Fqntoo x R «ryc�pn Pnper ©V '3;j w OCT -24 -2001 14:57 FROM- T -133 P- 004/004 F -060 ,* Prirnoo on l i..Y —o Papa' w $100 /drum minimum applies M All Others - Highly reactives, explosives, gas cylinders and biological waste are priced on a case by case basis (Cost + 10 %). These items, if accepted, will not be included in the $72.00 cost cap per car. D UU(30 ITEM //- G' MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL1 M AGENDA REPORT '- z To: The Honorable City Council From: Kenneth Gilbert, Director of Public Works Date: January 4, 2002 (Council Meeting of 1- 16 -02) SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. Designating Poindexter Avenue to be a Through Street in the Vicinity of Endeavor Court, and Directing the Placement of a Stop Sign at the Endeavor Court Entrance Thereto DISCUSSION A. Resolution / Location Attached as Exhibit 1 is the subject Resolution. The location of the subject intersection is shown on Exhibit `A' of the Resolution. B. Tract 4986: Endeavor Court The street improvement plans for Tract 4986 provided for the construction of Endeavor Court to serve the industrial properties in that area. Those plans call for the placement of a STOP sign for the south leg of the intersection of Endeavor Court and Poindexter Avenue. Said STOP sign has been installed by the developer of the properties to the south of that intersection. C. CitV Council Action Section 21354 of the California Vehicle Code states that the legislative body of any City may direct the placement of STOP signs upon streets under its jurisdiction. The subject Resolution provides such direction. RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No 2002- Attachments: Exhibit 1: Resolution 000339 stopendeavor RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING POINDEXTER AVENUE TO BE A THROUGH STREET IN THE VICINITY OF ENDEAVOR COURT, AND DIRECTING THE PLACEMENT OF A STOP SIGN AT THE ENDEAVOR COURT ENTRANCE THERETO WHEREAS, Section 21354 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) authorizes the City to designate any City street to be a through street, thereby allowing the placement of STOP signs at the entrances to said street; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has traffic at the intersection of Court would be rendered more controls were to be installed. determined that the movement of Poindexter Avenue and Endeavor safe if certain such traffic NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Poindexter Avenue is hereby designated a through street in the vicinity of Endeavor Court and a STOP sign is hereby directed to be placed at the south leg (northbound traffic) of said intersection, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to provide for the installation and maintenance of appropriate signs and markings to effectuate these requirements. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit `A': Diagram 000340 w m m a 0 F- cr w m m a Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit `A' LEGEND Stop Sign COMMERCE i N Z Q J 1- S ON, ITEM /1- 14 - <,,�a3'��x' F wc," Moorpark City Council Agenda Report''' To: The Honorable City Council From: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works Date: January 4, 2002 (Council Meeting 1- 16 -02) Subject: Consider Resolution in Support of Proposition 42, a Measure to Restrict the Use of Gasoline Taxes to Transportation System Improvements DISCUSSION A. Effect of the Pro onion Current law provides that gasoline taxes collected in excess of certain "ceiling" amounts shall be deposited into the State's General Fund. The effect of Proposition 42 would be to enact a State Constitutional Amendment requiring all such revenues to be deposited into a fund which shall be restricted to expenditures for transportation improvements. The affect of the measure would be to increase revenues for such purposes. B. Background Information A Memo with background information regarding the measure was previously provided to the City Council. C. League's Position The League of California Cities is in support of the passage of the Proposition. D. Resolution Attached as Exhibit 1 is a draft Resolution in support of Proposition 42. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002- Attachments: Exhibit 1: Resolution U Prop42 00342 Exhibit 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42 WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make our roads safer and reduce traffic without higher taxes by requiring the gasoline sales taxes we already pay be used to improve mass transit, highways and local roads; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco /Oakland second, San Diego sixth and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino /Riverside following close behind; and WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system needing attention, California has the third worst deteriorated roads in the nation and more than 6000 of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and ongoing source of transportation funding that will make it possible to plan for our future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every city and county to help fix potholes, repair dangerous road conditions and improve the safety of children walking or biking to school; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed up highway safety and traffic relief projects, and expand and improve mass transit systems; and WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to an annual audit and standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects thousands of new construction and other jobs will be created, our economy will be stimulated and every dollar invested in our highways will result in almost six times that in economic benefits. 000343 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby expresses its support of the passage of Proposition 42. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk 000344 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM IIA rec��►mr�,�,��lz�� lei, TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst DATE: January 10, 2002 (CC Meeting of 1/16/02) SUBJECT: CONSIDER SUPPORT FOR AB 1145 REGARDING FORMATION PROCEEDINGS FOR REGIONAL OPEN -SPACE DISTRICT IN VENTURA COUNTY BACKGROUND To form a regional open -space district in most counties, proponents must submit the proposal to the local agency formation commission for approval and circulate a petition for signature by at least 5,000 registered voters. A successful petition results in a public hearing by the board of supervisors, which can approve or disapprove the request. If the supervisors approve, the measure goes to the ballot. To form the district, a simple majority vote is required. AB 1145 (Jackson) would allow the Ventura County Board of Supervisors to initiate formation of a regional open -space district by holding a public hearing, adopting a resolution, and calling an election in lieu of the typical petition and hearing requirements. DISCUSSION Under AB 1145, the resolution would name the district, explain the reasons for formation, specify the district boundaries, create an elected five - member governing body, draw the boundaries of the five election wards, specify the district shall not have eminent domain power, describe the financing methods, and call the formation election. AB 1145 would allow the board of supervisors to provide for a single ballot measure or separate ballot measures to form the district, set the appropriations limit, levy special taxes, or authorize general obligation bonds. 000345 Honorable City Council January 10, 2002 Page 2 AB 1145 would not change the constitutional or statutory voter approval requirements to form a regional open -space district or generate revenues. All the requirements of Proposition 13 and Proposition 218 would apply. To form the district, a simple majority vote would be needed. To levy special taxes or issue general obligation bonds, a two- thirds vote would be required. Ventura is not the first county to seek legislative permission to speed up the formation process. Eight counties have successfully expedited formation of regional open -space districts: Los Angeles, Napa, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Sonoma. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Support AB 1145 and authorize the Mayor to sign letters of support. 000346