HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2002 0403 CC REGResolution No. 2002 -1958
Ordinance No. 280
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2002
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. INVOCATION:
Pastor Dave Wilkinson, Moorpark Presbyterian Church.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
4. ROLL CALL:
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Introduction of New Employee, David Bobardt, Planning
Manager, Community Development Department.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion
of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion
item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards
must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the
Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items
prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion
portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to
the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed
upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A
limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item
speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for
open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item
of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are
available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be
directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223.
4
City Council Agenda
April 3, 2002
Page 2
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.)
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE - AGENDA ITEMS:
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01, a Request
to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic
Beverages, other than Beer and Wine, (Liquor) in
Conjunction with Dining Where Beer and Wine is
Currently Sold at The Coffee Grinder Restaurant, 1 West
Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Reza Yassini.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing,
accept public testimony, and close the public hearing;
and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- conditionally
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider a Temporary Use Permit for Recreational
Vehicle Storage on Coast Auto Salvage Property (198
Lorraine Lane) . (Continued from City Council meeting of
March 20, 2002) Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as
deemed appropriate.
B. Consider Reconsideration of Item No. 10.A. on March 20,
2002 Agenda and Reconsideration of Vote on Item 10.A.
(Deferring General Plan Amendment Prescreening
Application Processing for Two Applications Filed in
2001, GPA Prescreen 2001 -02 and 2001 -03, One
Application Filed in 2000, GPA Prescreen 2000 -02, and
any other Developer- Initiated GPA Prescreening
Application until the November 2002 Application Filing
Period) . Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed
appropriate.
C. Consider the Review of the Moorpark Municipal Code
Sections 12.08 and 12.12, Regarding Trees and the Peach
Hill HOA Tree Removal Request. Staff Recommendation:
Appoint two Councilmembers to serve on an Ad Hoc
City Council Agenda
April 3, 2002
Page 3
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued)
Committee to review the Moorpark Municipal Code
Sections 12.08 and 12.12, and concur with staff's
intent to approve the removal of ten (10) Eucalyptus
trees adjacent to the back of Peach Hill School and the
Peach Hill Homeowners Association's obligation to plant
ten (10) replacement trees, species and location to be
approved by staff.
D. Review and Discuss Feasibility of Increasing Operations
at the SR -118 Truck Inspection Station to a 24 -Hour
Basis. Staff Recommendation: Discuss the feasibility of
increased commercial traffic enforcement in Moorpark
including increasing operating hours at the SB -118
Inspection Facility.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of July
18, 2001.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of
December 19, 2001.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year
2001 -2002 - April 3, 2002.
Manual Warrants
Voided Warrants
Payroll Liability
Warrants
Regular Warrants
108816 - 108821
108697 & 108797 &
108819
108822 - 108827
$ 2,573.00
$ (16, 295. 07 )
$ 8,762.38
108828 - 108911 & $ 21,353.25
108912 - 108949 $264,639.99
Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register.
C. Consider a Resolution Appropriating Funds for a Summer
Beach Bus Program Providing Public Transportation
From Moorpark To Zuma Beach County Park. Staff
City Council Agenda
April 3, 2002
Page 4
11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2002- , and
authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute a
new Agreement with Durham Transportation to operate the
Summer Beach Bus and to proceed with plans for a
transit service to the Ventura County Fair on a trial
basis. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
D. Consider a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of a
Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act
Grant Application to the California Department of
Conservation Division of Recycling. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
E. Consider a Resolution Authorizing Submittal of a Three
Year (2002/2005) Used Oil Recycling Block Grant
Application to the California Integrated Waste
Management Board. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2002-
F. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the
Planning Commission to set a Public Hearing and Provide
a Recommendation on a Zoning Code Amendment Related to
Signs for the Promotion of New Businesses. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
G. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the
Planning Commission to set a Public Hearing and Provide
a Recommendation on a Zoning Code Amendment Related to
Second Dwellings. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2002-
H. Consider Recognition Awards and Insurance Services
Office (ISO) Rating for the Moorpark Building and
Safety Division. Staff Recommendation: Receive and
file.
12. ORDINANCES:
13. CLOSED SESSION:
a
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
Significant
Subdivision
Code: (Number
exposure to
(b) of Section
of cases to be
- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
litigation pursuant to
54956.9 of the Government
discussed - 4)
City Council Agenda
April 3, 2002
Page 5
13. CLOSED SESSION: (continued)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark _
(Case No. SCO21825)
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO22256)
E. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City
Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative
Services, Director of Community Development, Director
of Community Services, and Director of Public Works.
F. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Employee Organization: Service Employees International
Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998
G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Unrepresented employees: Assistant City Manager,
Director of Administrative Services, ATCM /City Clerk,
Director of Community Development, Director of
Community Services, Director of Public Works,
Finance /Accounting Manager, Accountant I, Budget and
Finance Manager, Information Systems Supervisor,
Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Recreation
Superintendent, and Senior Management Analyst.
City Council Agenda
April 3, 2002
Page 6
13. CLOSED SESSION: (continued)
H. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property: APN 511 -0- 050 -080, Moorpark, CA 93021
Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: The City of Moorpark and Monte L.
Abbath
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
14. ADJOURNMENT:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance
to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at
(805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting
(28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II).
STEM 9-A
� a
AE: ;�_f�3i1Q ??r� lecomm�r�dakw,q
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
To: Honorable City Council
From: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director o Community
Development
Prepared by: Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner
Date: March 12, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/3/02)
Subject: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01, a Request
to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic
Beverages, other than Beer and Wine, (Liquor) in
Conjunction with Dining where Beer and Wine is
Currently Sold at The Coffee Grinder Restaurant, 1 W.
Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Reza Yassini
BACKGROUND
The Coffee Grinder Restaurant is an existing full service
restaurant located in the Moorpark Town Center. The existing
restaurant was recently expanded to occupy the area of the
adjacent vacant restaurant and the addition of a 272 square foot
entry, bringing the total floor area to 6,098 square feet. The
expansion included an exterior architectural alteration and
modification to the parking spaces adjacent to the front of the
building. These modifications were approved subject to Permit
Adjustment 2001 -08 to Planned Development (PD) Permit 980. The
expansion was made to accommodate banquet facilities. The owner
of the restaurant has now submitted an application for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01 to allow the sale and
consumption of alcoholic beverages (liquor) in addition to beer
and wine currently sold with food service.
DISCUSSION
The Coffee Grinder Restaurant is located at 1 West Los Angeles
Avenue on the Northwest corner of Moorpark Avenue and Los
Angeles Avenue within the existing 132,718 square foot Moorpark
Town Center. There are currently five - hundred and forty (540)
parking spaces on site. No additional parking will be required
as a result of this application. This restaurant currently
S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020403 Grinder CUP 20021 -01
rev.doc 4-%4-^'idr °'4
+/ ao v w d.,
Honorable City Council
April 3, 2002 Meeting
Page No. 2
serves beer and wine in conjunction with food service. The
applicant is concurrently processing an application with the
California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for full alcohol
service. The Conditional Use Permit application was forwarded
to the Moorpark Police Department. The Police Department has
indicated that they have no opposition to the approval of the
request and have included conditions of approval, which have
been incorporated into the draft resolution.
The applicant has stated the intent to use the expanded area for
banquets, parties, sports -media event viewings, training
seminars and expanded restaurant service capabilities. With the
exception of sports -media event viewings, these uses are
consistent with the traditional operation of a banquet facility.
Although these uses may be appropriate in such a facility, staff
recommends that adequate security precautions be in place during
such events. The City has customarily required security
personnel at its own site during rental events where alcohol is
served and in staff's opinion, this is not an unreasonable
requirement upon other facilities requesting similar uses.
Condition No. 11 is modeled after the City's policy. Staff also
recommends that events involving live music may warrant the need
for additional security precautions. The applicant has not
indicated the intent to allow a walk up "bar" at this location,
and appropriate conditions of approval will be added to ensure
that this shall not occur. The applicant has indicated that
there is no intent to charge admission or a "cover" charge for
special events that may be open to the public.
No floor plan modifications are proposed beyond those approved
by Permit Adjustment 2001 -08. All appropriate Building
Department Permits have been issued pursuant to said Permit
Adjustment. There are no sensitive uses, such as schools,
residences or places of worship directly adjacent to this site.
Zoning and General Plan Consistency
Section 17.20.060 governs permitted uses in commercial and
industrial zones. According to this code section,
establishments, with an eating place, that sell alcoholic
beverages, other than beer and wine, require a City Council
Approved Conditional Use Permit if they are in the Commercial
Planned Development (CPD) Zone.
Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying an
application, the City Council shall make written findings based
Honorable City Council
April 3, 2002 Meeting
Page No. 3
upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify
the decision. The appropriate findings and conditions have been
incorporated into the draft resolution.
The proposed restaurant, with or without alcohol sales, is a
land use that is consistent with the allowable uses in the CPD
Zone and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Designation of C -2 (General Commercial).
Environmental Determination
The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section
15301, Existing Facilities.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close
the public hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- conditionally approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01.
Attachments: 1. Site Plan
2. Pad Site Plan
3. Floor Plan (To City Council Under Separate
Cover)
4. Draft City Council Resolution with Findings
and Conditions of Approval
CIII
c
is
Wn
BITE AREA
LOS ANGELES AVE
VIQINITY MAP
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EKISTM BUADMO
'in •9N M
A1rA
0.9 Tts CUN
aAaaD U'ON nE FOLLiION_ _ _ Fe T199
Dw9R
/
8UROM AMA
�'� or
118TAM VW IF
J
LAtM/MD0. MTIO
IM Bn
"STAaUNi rAaT FOOD) V80 IF
"14TINO TO REIAAN
PARKM MON..
�1.wp9P
jITk C► TOTAL SITE
PAAKINO MOIID
901
PARKM PER CITY ETAAIDAJOR'
PA UM IY1T10
AtVTD00
LTALL $TA
Ia10 FULL MIa a1AW
PAAKM AREA �..' '.
3*M OF 6"
CALCUTATIMA .
-
,
LAINEOAPNIa wn..weRwlwww
9EAa/ K 16%
r1ETAl: rM.p afnao. aM aTAtla
alfi
•
��
l/V1INfMI10 wl....«
TAaf. 6f Nt
IEaT •NIT TOODI IAR6 Y/DO. MM arµla
oFF C Enloe aFnoo. �r arAle
y
i07K IAPIDEC/JYq •!
6y10B M in
TOTAL.• B01 STALLB
i
.
SITE PLAN.vm
D�
Wn
BITE AREA
BOf,W Bf
EK19TM0 P-4
BIO CARD
EKISTM BUADMO
'in •9N M
PROPOSED EIPANBKM
-'RAM OF
TOTAL NEW AREA
�f32.E70 OF
PMMK] REOUIRED
9W GRB
PARKM PROVIDED
= W CARS
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
UMS'APE PROVIDEO
"14TINO TO REIAAN
�1.wp9P
jITk C► TOTAL SITE
7
I
GENERAL NOTES: .
l A AM i0
TO TION M
1 ALL MOTH AAR EXOTM0 TO RPJAAN
9. L10rTTNL1 . PAFVUW 0 "TM TO
/. ��TA�MENUNDBICAPM OR E O5tWO TO REIAAK
1i
S§
�a
r�
�y5
4
9 A:1
i — ..,4un ✓- ri -, Wll.11 IIi3IIL IIUYIIkj dll IIILCIltILy ICVCI OV
not less than one foot candle at floor level.
i' � exrr
AAUC
I
I
i
1
1
x
w
Proposed Resi;aurant 'A'
(coffee Grinder- includes expansion)
4
VXIT
v,At4
Ac 9>
A `
ce Z
�A
�j
v
.N
a�
0
N
Z
W
a
FLOOR PLAN TO COUNCIL UNDER
SEPARATE COVER
ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002 -01 ALLOWING
ON -SITE ALCOHOL SALES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN
EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 1 WEST LOS ANGELES
AVENUE ON THE APPLICATION OF REZA YASSINI
(ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 511 -0- 080 -405)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 3, 2002,
the City Council considered Conditional Use Permit (CPD) No.
2002 -01 on the application of Reza Yassini to allow the on -site
sale and consumption of liquor in conjunction with dining where
on -site beer and wine sale and consumption is currently allowed
at 1 West Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor Parcel Nos. 511- 0 -080-
405); and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 3, 2002, the City Council
conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, and closed
the public hearing.
WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of
the information contained in the staff report and public
testimony has reached a decision on this matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that approval
of Conditional Use Permit 2002 -01 is consistent with the purpose
and intent of provisions of Title 17, Zoning, of the Moorpark
Municipal Code, including specific development criteria contained
in the Zoning Code related to alcohol sales.
SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following
additional findings:
C.E.Q.A. Finding
The proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of The
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, pursuant
to Section 15301 relating to the continuing use of existing
facilities.
ATTACHMENT4
F's a Urn
s: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020403 reso -cond cup 02 -01
grinder rev.doc 4-N,4",
Cvv v
Resolution No. 2002 -
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01
Reza Yassini
Page 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS:
1. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the intent and
provisions of the City's General Plan and of the City
Municipal Code.
2. The Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the character
of surrounding development.
3. The Conditional Use Permit would not be obnoxious or
harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or
uses.
4. The Conditional Use Permit would not be detrimental to the
public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare.
5. The conditionally permitted use is compatible with existing
and planned land uses in the general area where the
development is to be located.
6. The use will not result in an over concentration in the area
of establishments selling alcoholic beverages. The proposal
is not creating a new establishment, merely modifying the
category of allowable alcohol sales at an existing
establishment.
7. The use will serve a public convenience.
8. The use will not create the need for increased police
services.
9. The requested use at the proposed location will not
adversely affect the economic welfare of the community; and
10. The exterior appearance of the structure will not be
inconsistent with the external appearance of commercial
structures already constructed or under construction on
surrounding properties, or within the immediate neighborhood
so as to cause blight, deterioration or substantially
diminish property values within the neighborhood.
C. 4 -0 I\.-%. ^
SACommuniity DevelopmenNEveryone\Resolubons and Conditionslcc 020403 reso -cond cup 02 -01 grinder rev.doc 10' � " '' 5
Resolution No. 2002 -
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01
Reza Yassini
Page 3
SECTION 3. The City Council approves Conditional Use Permit
No. 2002 -01 subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit A
(Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City c:ierx
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
SACommunity DevelopmentlEveryonMesolubons and Conditionslcc 020403 reso-oond cup 02 -01 grinder rev.doc
Resolution No. 2002 -
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01
Reza Yassini
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002 -01
A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
1. The development shall'be in substantial conformance with the
plans presented in conjunction with the application for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01, except any modifications
as may be required to meet specific Building Code and Zoning
Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein.
2. Security personnel shall be provided to monitor the parking
area(s) designated for use by customers of the restaurant
during any activity that may require the need for additional
security. The applicant shall work with the Police
Department and Community Development Department staff to
determine which activities shall require additional
security. The owner /manager shall be required to obtain
Temporary Use Permit approval from the City of Moorpark when
a scheduled activity could create a need for increased
police presence.
3. The proprietor shall reimburse the City of Moorpark for any
additional police or other costs incurred by the City as a
result of operations of the restaurant, including 150
overhead on any such services.
4. At all times when the premises are open for business, the
sale /service of alcoholic beverages shall be made only in
conjunction with the sale /service of food.
5. There shall be no "walk -in" alcohol service for non -
restaurant /banquet customers. Alcoholic beverages may only
be sold /served to patrons of the facility during dining
and /or banquet events.
6. There shall be no "cover" charge, admission or entry fee for
special event uses.
7. There shall be no alcohol service at the conclusion of
events.
8. No person under the age of twenty -one (21) shall sell or
package alcoholic beverages.
9. All exterior areas of the site, including parking areas
under use by the restaurant, shall be maintained free of
litter and debris at all times.
cl!
Or e Ir., eN +rl tru"
V' yr %.' W r
S:1Community DevelopmentEveryone\Resolutions and Conditionslcc 020403 reso -cond cup 02 -01 grinder rev.doc
Resolution No. 2002 -
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01
Reza Yassini
Page 5
10. Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01 may be revoked or its use
suspended by City, if any of the causes listed in Section
17.44.080.B of the Zoning Code are found to apply, including
if the use for which the permit was granted has not been
exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has
ceased to exist, or has been abandoned. The discontinuance
for a period of one hundred eighty (180) or more days of a
nonconforming use or a change of nonconforming use to a
conforming use constitutes abandonment and termination of
the nonconforming status of the use.
11. The renting party shall provide two security guards for up
to 100 attendees, and one additional security guard for each
additional 50 attendees or portion thereof, up to the
maximum occupancy allowed by Code. The security guards are
to be hired from the time alcohol is served until all guests
have vacated the property. Proof that security guards have
been hired must be provided no less than 2 (two) weeks prior
to the event. The applicant shall pay for all costs related
to providing security guards to the security company in
advance of the event. The only exception shall be for
special events held by Moorpark based non - profit groups.
B. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
12. Sales, Service or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall
be permitted only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 10:00
p.m. each day of the week.
13. The quarterly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not
exceed fifty percent (50 %) of the gross sales of food during
the same period. The Coffee Grinder Family Restaurant shall
at all times maintain records which reflect separately the
gross sale of food and the gross sales of alcoholic
beverages of the business. Said records shall be kept no
less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made
available to the Moorpark Police Department upon demand.
14. Areas inside the establishment open to customers shall be
illuminated sufficiently to allow the identification of
persons.
15. The manager or his /her designee shall be responsible to
police the exterior of the business to assure that no
alcoholic beverages are consumed on any property adjacent to
the restaurant. The owner /manager shall not permit any
loitering on the property adjacent to the restaurant.
16. There shall be no advertising of any kind or type, including
directed to the exterior from within, promoting or
%
SACommunity DevelopmenflEveryone\Resolutions and Conditionslcc 020403 reso -cond cup 02 -01 grinder rev.doc C ' `� � , J
Resolution No. 2002 -
Conditional Use Permit No. 2002 -01
Reza Yassini
Page 6
indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages.
Interior displays of alcoholic beverages that are clearly
visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this
condition.
17. The Coffee Grinder Family Restaurant must correct any safety
or security problem within thirty (30) days upon written
notice of such a problem . from the Moorpark Police
Department.
18. Any and all employees directly involved or supervising the
sale /service of alcoholic beverages shall provide evidence
and the business shall maintain records that employees have:
a. Received training from the State of California
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control "Leadership
and Education in Alcohol and Drugs" LEAD program in the
form of an ABC issued certificate.
b. The Owner /Manager shall confirm with the California
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control within 15 days
of hire any new employee has been scheduled with the
local (Santa Barbara ABC office) to attend the LEAD
program course.
SACommunity DevelopmentIveryonMesolutions and Conditionslcc 020403 reso -cond cup 02 -01 gender rev.doc 4
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting
Development Director
March 28, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/3/02)
1 �
CTTY OF'MOORPARK, C.ALTFORNTA
City Cmincil Nfeetine
of s�,OT;)m3
ACT3O : Q LCL�:sbA 10 PMaQ P�
an cxoomyalseso_ for a temQ.
BY:
Community
Consider a Temporary Use Permit for Recreational
Vehicle Storage on Coast Auto Salvage Property (198
Lorraine Lane)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
This item was continued from the City Council's meeting of
March 20, 2002. The applicant's representative has submitted
further information in a letter dated March 26, 2002, and that
letter has been distributed to the City Council under separate
cover.
The referenced letter is not clear that, pursuant to Ordinance
No. 255, the Moorpark Recreational Vehicle Storage business
still requires City Council approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the RV storage use under the nonconforming
change of use provision (Section 17.52.060.C.2.). As
discussed at the March 20 meeting, the City Council may want
to use the language in Section 17.52.060.C.2. to allow the
Temporary Use Permit for the RV storage on the coast Auto
Salvage Property. The referenced code section language is as
follows:
2. Change of Use. The nonconforming use may be changed
to a use that is similar with approval of a city council
approved conditional permit pursuant to the requirements
of Chapter 17.44 (Entitlements -- Process and Procedures),
provided the changed use is considered to have no
greater impact than the previously existing use, is
similar to the nonconforming use and is not considered
as an expansion of the existing use. Conditions may be
imposed, including, but not limited to time limitations,
as deemed necessary for the compatibility of such
nonconforming use with adjacent properties.
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc
020403 stf rpt TUP RV Storage.doc A1d ,n <
Honorable City Council
April 3, 2002 Meeting
Page 2
If the City Council wants to consider approval of the
requested temporary use, then staff should be directed to
schedule an item on the April 17 agenda to include a draft
resolution and conditions of approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable City Council
ITEM t 4 • /3.
CITY OF MOORPARK, CAI.IFORNTA
City Council Meeting
of
ACTION: IRLVI EC nVG� . dem nip Ira
BY:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community
Development �I
March 28, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/3/02)
SUBJECT: Consider Reconsideration of Item No. 10.A. on March
20, 2002 Agenda and Reconsideration of Vote on Item
10.A. (Deferring General Plan Amendment Prescreening
Application Processing for Two Applications Filed in
2001, GPA Prescreen 2001 -02 and 2001 -03, One
Application Filed in 2000, GPA Prescreen 2000 -02, and
any other Developer- Initiated GPA Prescreening
Application until the November 2002 Application Filing
Period)
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The City Council took action at the March 20, 2002 regular
meeting to defer processing and consideration of General Plan
Amendment (GPA) Prescreening Applications until the November
2002 filing period.
Councilmember Mikos has requested that an item be scheduled for
the April 3 agenda to allow City Council reconsideration of its
vote on the March 20 agenda item pertaining to deferring General
Plan Amendment prescreening application processing. She is
requesting reconsideration of the DeeWayne Jones General Plan
Amendment Prescreening Application 2000 -02. Motion
reconsideration is permitted by Section 7.12 of the City Council
Rules and Procedures (Resolution No. 99- 1613). Any
Councilmember who voted with the majority may move a
reconsideration of any vote at the same meeting or request an
agenda item on the next regular meeting. Two separate motions
would be required. The first motion would be to consider
reconsideration of the vote. The second motion would be to
reconsider the vote.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020403 GPAs.doc
v�..�.Z
Honorable City Council
April 3, 2002 Meeting
Page 2
Councilmember Mikos will make a verbal presentation at the April
3 meeting regarding the reason for her request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Y ^O
ITEM 0- • C
CI FY 101tr MOORP,1Rk, C.1I,IFOWNIA
City C'onned tiiee,ing
rf 1 "a OCa
AC:TIpN:(19 P IQVv �A !L e)h mo&
CITY OF MOORPARK kvnj16j -Q Vg , ;jAkyh mwak I J= replace
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT IT lveli 3 µa }ham?tcmr
BY:-
TO: The Honorable City Council !
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: March 19, 2002 (CC Meeting of April 3, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider the Review of the Moorpark Municipal
Code Sections 12.08 and 12.12, Regarding Trees
and the Peach Hill HOA Tree Removal Request
At the City Council's request, this agenda item is
presented to initiate a review of the City's tree polices.
It is proposed that the Council establish an Ad Hoc
Committee to review appropriate Municipal Code sections and
return to the full Council with a recommendation.
Additionally, the City is in receipt of a request from the
Peach Hill Homeowners Association to remove a significant
number of trees over time. Since the two issues are
related, it is also proposed that the aforementioned
proposed committee review the Association request
concurrently with the review of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND
At its March 6, 2002, meeting, the City Council requested
that staff agendize a review of the City's Municipal Code
in regards to trees. The City addresses trees in two
section of the Municipal Code: Section 12.08, Trees, Shrubs
and Plants; and Section 12.12, Historic Trees, Native Oak
Trees and Mature Trees.
The two Code sections are summarized as follows:
Municipal Code Section 12.08, Trees, Shrubs and
Plants: This section identifies the City's desire to
E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C ;; ;; J
Tree Removal Report
Page 2
preserve all trees in the City, including, but not
limited to, trees which are creating damage to surface
improvements or underground facilities or which are
diseased, or located where construction is considered.
The Code Section goes on to identify individuals
responsible for trees on public and private property
and the process the City shall undertake to gain
compliance from private property owners. (see
Attachment A)
Municipal Code Section 12.12, Historic Trees, Native
Oak and Mature Trees: This section identifies the
City's desire to protect and preserve mature, native
and historic trees where possible, and covers trees on
public and private property and within urban
developments (development projects). Generally, the
Section states that no mature, native, or historic
tree may be removed without an approved tree permit
(except trees in rear and side yard not abutting a
public street) . Tree removals may be granted for the
following reasons: a) the condition of the tree poses
a danger; b) the removal is necessary to construct
improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the
property; c) the number of historic, mature, or native
trees existing in the neighborhood is sufficient; d)
good forestry practices support the removal; e) to
facilitate construction of required improvements in
the right -of -way; f) suitability of the tree species
in a specific area. (see Attachment B)
During the 2001 calendar year, the City processed 80 tree
removal permits. An additional 14 tree removal requests
were denied. A copy of the City's tree removal permit is
attached to this report (Attachment C). Occasionally, we
receive reports that trees have been removed without City
consideration. In these cases, staff attempts to secure the
owners cooperation to plant a replacement tree. While the
Code states that a violation of Chapter 12.12 is a
misdemeanor, the City has not prosecuted violators.
Tree Removal Request
The City is in receipt of a request from the Peach Hill
Homeowners Association (See Attachment D) requesting
approval for the removal of 64 Eucalyptus trees. According
to the HOA, within the property of the Association there
are 131 existing Eucalyptus trees. The trees create an
n F1.n, s� ,�r ►-�
E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc..y ...
Tree Removal Report
Page 3
abundance of shade and debris, and the maintenance of the
trees is expensive. The HOA is proposing to remove the
trees in phases over the next three to four years.
As background, in 1989 the HOA requested removal of 88
Eucalyptus trees throughout the tract. The City Council
approved the request.
City staff has inspected the HOA trees in the area between
Quail Summit Road and the back of Peach Hill School.
Additionally, the City had these trees reviewed by a
licensed arborist. The trees proposed for removal by the
HOA in the other greenbelt areas within the HOA property
have not been reviewed by the City.
While most of the trees in the aforementioned area have
been heavily pruned and topped, and as a result they have
significant sucker growth, they are all healthy and do not
appear to pose a concern of failing, nor do they interfere
with existing property improvements. However, it is
acknowledged that a majority of the trees are close to back
property lines of the residences and that in some cases
they block the sun and create some maintenance obligations
on the part of the HOA and individual homeowners from
falling bark and leaves.
DISCUSSION
Because of the Council's interest in reviewing City tree
policies and the receipt of the Peach Hill HOA's tree
removal request, staff recommends that discussion of these
two issues be combined. To assist with the Council's
efforts, it is proposed that a Council Ad Hoc Committee of
two Councilmembers and City staff be formed. The Ad Hoc
Committee would present its recommendation to the full
Council at a future meeting.
With regards to the tree removals in the area adjacent to
Peach Hill School, staff recommends allowing the HOA to
remove 10 trees, provided the HOA plants '10 new trees of a
different species than Eucalyptus (possibly Oak) in the
general area of the existing Eucalyptus, but further back
from the residential property line. Staff would approve the
specific trees to be removed and the species and location
of the 10 replacement trees. This is consistent with the
City's current Municipal Code.
,r,
E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C `.,
Tree Removal Report
Page 4
As an option, the City Council could choose to direct the
postponement of any tree removals concerning the Peach Hill
Homeowners Association until the Ad Hoc Committee has had
an opportunity to review the entire phased request. As
stated above, the trees do not pose increased hazard and a
delay in the City's decision can be accommodated.
RECOMMENDATION
Appoint two Councilmembers to serve on an Ad Hoc Committee
to review the Moorpark Municipal Code Sections 12.08 and
12.12, and concur with staff's intent to approve the
removal of 10 Eucalyptus trees adjacent to the back of
Peach Hill School and the Peach Hill Homeowners
Association's obligation to plant 10 replacement trees,
species and location to be approved by staff.
Attachments:
A - MMC 12.08
B - MMC 12.12
C - Tree Removal Permit
D - Peach Hill HOA Leter
,r*� �
E:\MLindley \Landscp Zones \tree ordinance ccagda.doc C—
or impairs the sight distance for safe pedestrian or vehicular
traffic. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983)
12.04.930 Maintenance of plantings.
The permittee shall maintain hedges, shrubs or other
plantings and fences or similar structures in a neat and
orderly condition. If the encroachment is not so maintained
the commissioner may direct the permittee to remove the
encroachment and restore the right -of -way to its former
condition at the expense of the permittee. (Ord. 6 § 16
(part), 1983)
Article VIII. Appeals and Penalties
12.04.940 Appeals.
A. Any person aggrieved by the refusal or revocation
of a permit may appeal to the board of supervisors within
thirty (30) days after the date of such action. The appeal
shall be in the form of a written notice filed with the clerk
of the board of supervisors and signed by the applicant.
The notice shall have attached a copy of the application
as filed with the commissioner, shall recite such other items
as have been filed, and shall state clearly and concisely
the grounds upon which the applicant relies in his appeal.
B. The clerk of the board of supervisors shall set the
matter for hearing fifteen (15) days after the notice is filed,
and shall notify the applicant and the commissioner of the
setting.
C. At the hearing, the applicant shall establish to the
satisfaction of the board that he is entitled to issuance of
a permit under this chapter or to reinstatement of a permit
previously revoked. The commissioner may present his
grounds for denial or revocation of the permit. The decision
of the board is final. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983)
12.04.950 Violation — Penalty.
Every person who performs any work regulated by this
chapter, either without first obtaining a permit therefor from
the commissioner or having a permit, fails or refuses to
comply with any applicable provisions of this chapter with
any condition of the permit or performs work contrary to
any of the general or special requirements or specifications
of the permit, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is guilty
of a separate offense for every day during any part of which
such violation occurs. (Ord. 6 § 16 (part), 1983)
227
ATTACHMENT-A
12.04.920
Chapter 12.08
TREES, SHRUBS AND PLANTS
Sections:
12.08.010
City policy.
12.08.020
Enforcement and implementation
authority.
12.08.030
Trees on public property—
Responsibility.
12.08.040
Trees on private property—
Responsibility.
12.08.050
Diseased or infested trees —
Removal or replacement.
12.08.060
Prohibited acts.
12.08.070
Native plants.
12.08.080
Plantings on public property.
12.08.090
Interference with visibility at
intersections prohibited.
12.08.100
Excavations or street work —
Protection of trees.
12.08.110
Development landscape fee.
12.08.120
Nonliability of city.
12.08.130
Appeals.
12.08.010 City policy.
Consistent with Chapter 12.12 of this title regulating
the preservation, cutting and removal of historic trees, native
oak trees and mature trees and with Resolution 88 -520
setting forth Guidelines for a Master Tree Plan, it shall
be the city's policy to utilize whatever techniques, methods
and procedures are required to preserve, whenever feasible,
all trees in the city including, but not limited to, trees which
are creating damage to surface improvements or under-
ground facilities or which are diseased, or located where
construction is being considered or will occur. (Ord. 102
§ 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.020 Enforcement and implementation
authority.
The director of community services ( "director") shall
enforce, implement and carry out the policy, provisions
and regulations of this chapter in a manner which is consis-
tent with other established policies of the city. (Ord. 102
§ 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.030 Trees on public property—
Responsibility.
The director of community services shall be responsible
for the preservation of, and when required, the removal
of all trees on public property. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988)
-a
12.08.040
12.08.040 Trees on private property—
Responsibility.
A. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner
or the occupant to prevent any tree, shrub or plant on his
private property from overhanging or projecting into public
property. The director shall have the authority to require
the property owner or the occupant to prune, trim, cut down
or remove any such tree, shrub or plant, or parts thereof,
if it appears to the director to be dead, liable to fall, danger-
ous, an obstruction to public travel, or is not pruned or
trimmed to a height of fourteen (14) feet, six (6) inches
above the paved portion of the street to accommodate such
vehicles as garbage trucks, buses, moving vans and street
maintenance trucks. Except in a case of manifest public
danger and immediate necessity, no such tree, shrub or
plant shall be pruned, trimmed, cut down or removed by
the director unless the director has given the property owner
and the occupant ten (10) days' written notice to take
corrective action. If the necessary corrective action is not
taken by the property owner or his occupant within (10)
days, the director shall perform the services and the cost
thereof shall be assessed to the property owner, including
the cost of labor (including overhead), equipment and
materials.
B. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner
or his occupant to treat or remove any tree, shrub, plant,
grass or other vegetation on his private property, if it is
so diseased or insect- infected as to constitute a hazard to
other trees, shrubs or plants. The director shall have the
authority to require the property owner or the occupant
to take such action as is necessary to control insects, scales,
parasites, fungi and other injurious pests or diseases. The
director shall notify the property owner and the occupant
in writing, describing the conditions, stating the control
necessary for correction, and provide thirty (30) days within
which the required steps must be taken. If the property
owner or the occupant questions the necessity for such
action, the director shall refer the matter to a plant patholo-
gist whose decision shall be final. If necessary corrective
action is not taken within the time specified, the director
is authorized in the public interest, to enter on the property
in question and to spray, trim, prune or treat or remove
all or any part of the tree, shrub, plant, grass or other
vegetation determined to be infested or diseased. The charge
assessed to the property owner shall be equal to the cost
of labor (including overhead), equipment and materials.
Nothing in this section prevents the director from taking
immediate action for removal if he determines that such
action is necessary for the public health, safety or welfare.
(Ord. 102 § I (part), 1988)
12.08.050 Diseased or infested trees — Removal
or replacement.
A. If any tree on public property is infected or infested
with insects, pests or disease, the director shall cause such
condition to be treated or, if any such tree is infected or
infested to such a degree that the condition cannot be
eradicated by treatment, the director may order the removal
and/or replacement of the tree.
B. The director, after unsuccessfully utilizing all
techniques, methods and procedures which he deems reason-
able to save trees planted on public property which are
dead, dying, in a dangerous condition, unsafe or likely to
cause damage, shall remove and/or replace such trees. (Ord.
102 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.060 Prohibited acts.
No person, except authorized city personnel, shall
remove, destroy, deface or injure any tree on public property
by any means including, but not limited to, the following:
A. By pouring any material on any tree or on the
ground which would be harmful to the tree;
B. By attaching any sign or notice or other object on
any tree or fastening any guy wire, cable, rope, nails or
screws or any other device to any tree, except that agencies
may, under the supervision of the director, temporarily
affix no- parking signs to trees when necessary in con-
junction with activities in the public interest, such as street
improvement work, tree maintenance work or parades;
C. By causing or encouraging any unnecessary fire
or burning near or around any tree;
D. By constructing a concrete, asphalt, brick or gravel
surface, or otherwise covering the ground within a one
(1) foot radius of any tree so as to shut off air or water
from the roots, except under written authority from the
director. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988)
228
12.08.070 Native plants.
It is unlawful for any person to dig up, pick, break off,
cut or destroy any native tree, plant, berry- bearing shrub,
fern or any wild flower, or to pick, break off or cut any
bud, bloom or blossom from any of said plants, trees or
shrubs within three hundred (300) feet of the middle of
any leveled road or highway within the county, unless,
in the case of private lands, the owner thereof gives his
written consent thereto. (Ord. 6 § 14 (part), 1983)
12.08.080 Plantings on public property.
A. No person shall plant any tree or any shrub or plant
with a mature height in excess of thirty -six inches on any
public property of the city without written permission from
the director.
B. Any tree, shrub or plant planted in violation of
subsection A of this section may be removed by the direc-
tor. The director shall notify the abutting property owner
in writing, listing the unlawfully planted trees, shrubs or
plants, ordering their removal, and provide thirty (30) days
within which removal shall be accomplished. In the event
removal is not accomplished within the specified time, the
director is authorized to remove the trees, shrubs or plants
and the cost thereof shall be assessed to the property owner.
The charge assessed the property owner shall be equal to
the cost of labor (including overhead), equipment and
materials. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.090 Interference with visibility at
intersections prohibited.
No trees shall be planted within twenty (20) feet of the
intersection of one county highway right -of -way line with
another county highway right -of -way line. (Ord. 6 § 14
(part), 1983).
12.08.100 Excavations or street
work — Protection of trees.
A. Any tree growing upon public property near any
excavation, construction or street work shall be sufficiently
guarded and protected by those responsible for such work
so as to prevent any injury to the tree.
B. No person shall excavate any ditches, tunnels or
trenches, or install pavement within a radius of four (4)
feet from any tree on public property without the written
permission of the director. (Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.110 Development landscape fee.
A. The development of projects of residential, commer-
cial and industrial nature removes land from its natural
state and replaces the natural state and natural landscape
with manmade structures.
B. In order to ensure that there is a certain amount
of landscape remaining in the city in the way of trees, plants
and shrubs, the city shall impose a landscape fee on each
new project in an amount to be determined by resolution
of the city council. The fee shall be used for the installation,
maintenance and replacement of trees, plants and shrubs
on public property.
C. Landscape work in the city will provide a benefit
to those living and/or working in the new developments
by preserving the visual environment and the air quality,
both of which are impacted by new development. This fee
is separate and distinct from any other fee imposed. (Ord.
102 § 1 (part), 1988)
229
12.08.080
12.08.120 Nonliability of city.
Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to impose any
liability upon the city or upon any of its officers or employ-
ees nor to relieve the owner and occupant of any private
property from the duty to keep trees and shrubs upon private
property or under his control or upon sidewalks and park-
ways in front of such private property in a safe condition.
(Ord. 102 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.08.130 Appeals.
A. Any decision by the director shall be appealable
by any aggrieved person to the city manager.
B. An appeal of the city manager shall be appealable
to the parks and recreation commission. Appeals of the
commission shall be heard by the city council.
C. All appeals shall be in writing, stating the decision
appealed from and reasons for the appeal, and filed within
ten (10) days of the decision being appealed. (Ord. 102
§ 1 (part), 1988)
V V V'�•J �1/
12.12.010
Chapter 12.12
HISTORIC TREES, NATIVE OAK TREES
AND MATURE TREES
Sections:
12.12.010
Purpose of provisions.
12.12.020
Applicability of provisions.
12.12.030
Definitions.
12.12.040
Removal— Prohibitions.
12.12.050
Urban development
proposals— Report guidelines.
12.12.060
Urban development proposals —
Tree preservation guidelines.
12.12.070
Tree removal permits —
Requirements.
12.12.080
Tree removal permits —
Standards for grant or denial.
12.12.090
Exemptions.
12.12.100
Damaging of trees prohibited.
12.12.110
Liability.
12.12.120
Appeals.
12.12.130
Violation— Penalty.
12.12.010 Purpose of provisions.
It is the determination of the council that proper and
necessary steps should be taken in order to protect and
preserve, to the greatest extent possible, mature trees, native
oak trees and historic trees, especially where such trees
are associated with proposals for urban development, as
such trees are a significant, historical, aesthetic and valuable
ecological resource. It is the intent of this chapter to main-
tain and enhance the general health, safety and welfare
of the citizens of the city by assisting in counteracting air
pollution, by minimizing soil erosion and other related en-
vironmental damage and by enhancing the aesthetic environ-
ment of the city. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988) .
12.12.020 Applicability of provisions.
The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all living
historic trees, native oak trees and mature trees, including
but not limited to, where those trees are associated with
proposals for urban development, on all public or private
property within the limits of the city, except as specified
in Section 12.12.090 of this chapter. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part),
1988)
12.12.030 Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter, certain words and phrases
used in this chapter shall be defined as follows:
"Associated with a proposal for urban development"
means any land area for which an application for an entitle-
230
ATTACHMENT
ment, other than for a zone clearance, has been filed with
and is pending consideration by the city. If such entitlement
has been approved but the related project or applicable
phase thereof has not been completed, the city shall attempt
to work with the applicant to save as many trees which
are protected by this chapter as possible.
"Dripline" means the outermost edge of the tree's
canopy. When depicted on a map, the dripline will appear
as an irregular shaped circle that follows the contour of
the tree's branches as seen from overhead.
"Historic tree" means a living tree designated by reso-
lution of the city council as an historic tree because of an
association with some event or person of historical signifi-
cance to the community or because of special recognition
due to size, condition or aesthetic qualities.
"Lot" means an area of land created or established for
purposes of sale, lease, finance, division of interest or
separate use, separated from other lands by description
on a final map or parcel map.
"Mature tree" means a living tree with a cross- sectional
area of all major stems, as measured four and one -half
(41/2) feet above the root crown, of seventy-two (72) or
more square inches.
"Native oak tree" means a living tree of the genus
Quercus and species lobata, agrifolia, dumosa or hybrids
thereof. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.12.040 Removal — Prohibitions.
No native oak tree, historic tree or mature tree shall
be removed, cut down, or otherwise destroyed, except as
provided for in Sections 12.12.070 through 12.12.090. (Ord.
101 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.12.050 Urban development proposals —
Report guidelines.
A. Where one or more native oak trees, historic trees
or mature trees are associated with any proposal for urban
development, the director of community development or
his or her designated representative, shall cause a report
to be prepared on those trees, otherwise, tree removals
(public and private) shall be processed through the commu-
nity services department.
B. An applicant for a proposal for urban development
shall provide to the city the precise vertical and horizontal
location within plus or minus one (1) foot of each mature
tree on the subject parcel and the generalized locations
of all mature trees within twenty (20) feet of the project
boundary.
C. Tree reports shall be prepared by an arborist, horti-
culturist or registered landscape architect who are on a
list approved by resolution of the city council. Tree reports
shall include the following information:
i, C If,# AF -\ #-% v� ti x043
1. Tree type by common name and genus and species;
2. The diameter of trunks or main stems as measured
four and one -half (4' /x) feet above the root crown;
3. The average spread of each tree;
4. A letter grade for the health of each tree. Grades
employed shall be "A" for outstanding, `B" for good, "C"
for average, "D" for below average;
5. A letter grade for the aesthetic quality of each tree
employing those grades defined in subsection (C)(4) of
this section;
6. Disclosure of any significant disease or insect
infestations, heart rot, fire, mechanical or wind damage;
7. Recommended tree surgery, chemical treatment
or other remedial measures intended to improve the health,
safety or life expectancy of the tree;
8. Appraisal value of each tree which shall be es-
tablished and provided to the city using the most recent
edition of the Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and
Other Plants, prepared by the Council of Tree Landscape
Appraisers.
D. The director of community development, or his or
her designated representative, may waive the requirement
for a tree report or may waive the requirement for survey
of one (1) or more trees based upon the director's judgment
that the tree(s) would have little or no value in that location.
(Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.12.060 Urban development proposals —
Tree preservation guidelines.
A. Initial project layout, design and grading shall
recognize the desirability of preserving native oak trees,
historic trees or mature trees with appropriate modifications
and adjustments to accommodate preservation and mainte-
nance by locating the best candidates in areas where preser-
vation is feasible. Design of the grading and other improve-
ments shall reflect consideration of the following safeguards:
1. Location in minimum growing areas as required
by individual species;
2. No disruption or removal of structural feeder roots;
3. Fencing of trees at or beyond their driplines during
grading and construction activities;
4. No filling, cutting, development or compaction of
soils within the dripline;
5. Such other measures required by the species of tree
to be preserved as recommended by the consulting arborist,
horticulturist or landscape architect.
B. It is recognized that the complete preservation of
healthy trees may sometimes conflict with normal land
developmental considerations such as proper drainage, grad-
ing, circulation, safety and provision of utilities. Within
a given development, it may not be practical to preserve
all healthy trees, and therefore, the city and the developer
12.12.050
must be willing to compromise the goal of complete tree
preservation in order to address other public safety and
design concerns. In such instances, the design of the de-
velopment must address preservation of the most desirable
and significant of the healthy trees and the developer is
encouraged to utilize creative land planning techniques
to achieve this end.
C. The planning commission of the city, when review-
ing development plans, shall determine the adequacy and
appropriateness of the proposed preservation plan.
D. Following approval of such a development, the de-
veloper shall submit grading, improvement and precise
landscaping plans detailing the approved preservation plan.
Such plans shall be approved by the city engineer and/or
the director of community development, as appropriate.
Prior to use inauguration, the preserved trees shall be
trimmed for balance, structural integrity, ornamental ap-
pearance and treated for any diseases.
E. The precise vertical and horizontal locations plus
or minus one (1) foot of all mature trees shall be shown
on an exhibit as part of the initial application for any project
unless that project would involve no exterior construction
activities. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988)
231
12.12.070 Tree removal permits —
Requirements.
The appropriate department shall give priority to inspec-
tion of those requests based upon hazardous conditions,
and may refer any request to the appropriate commission
for determination.
A. Permit Required. No native oak tree, historic tree
or other mature tree, where that tree is on public or private
property, except as provided for in subsection B of this
section, or is associated with a proposal for urban develop-
ment, shall be removed, cut down, or otherwise destroyed,
unless a tree removal permit has been issued by the city.
The director of community services shall establish the
format and information required for a tree removal permit
consistent with this chapter. In no event shall a permit be
denied if to do so would cause interference with the eco-
nomic use and enjoyment of the property.
B. Single Parcel Review Requirement. Permits for re-
moval of trees on any single parcel shall be required from
the appropriate commission or director or his designee as
follows:
1. For any historic tree on the parcel;
2. For removal of one or more historic trees, mature
trees or native oak trees when such trees are in the front
yard, side yard or rear yard which abuts a public street.
For purposes of this section only, "front yard" means that
portion of the property extending from the front of a
structure, forward to the front property line; the "side yard"
A
12.12.070
means that portion of the property extending from the side
of a structure in front to the rear property line; "rear yard"
means that portion of the property extending from the rear
of a structure backward to the rear property line, as shown
in the following diagram:
BACK YARD
SIDE YARD SIDE YARD
STRUCTURE
FRONT YARD
C. Site Inspection. Prior to the issuance of such permit,
the appropriate director, or his or her designee, shall inspect
the premises involved and shall designate the tree(s) to
be removed or moved. Failure to provide access to the
premises shall be grounds for denial of the permit.
D. Project Approval Required. No tree removal permit
shall be issued for the removal of any tree on any lot asso-
ciated with a proposal for urban development unless the
project has been approved by the city or unless the director
of community development, or his or her designee, de-
termines that the immediate removal of the tree is required
because of the condition of the tree with respect to disease,
danger of collapse of all or any portion of the tree, proximi-
ty to an existing structure, or interference with utility ser-
vices.
E. Removal Not Associated with a Proposal for Urban
Development. Where tree(s) are proposed for removal that
are not associated with a proposal for urban development,
the director of community services, or his or her designee,
may condition a tree removal permit upon the replacement
of the certain tree(s). Any applicant for a tree removal
permit shall not be required to expend more on the replace-
ment tree(s) than the appraised value of the tree(s) for which
a permit is required. An appraisal shall be done in accor-
dance with Section 12.12.050C.
F. Removal Associated with a Proposal for Urban De-
velopment. Where tree(s) are proposed for removal that
are associated with a proposal for urban development, the
director of community development, or his or her designee,
shall cause an appraisal of the value of said tree(s) to be
prepared in accordance with Section 12.12.050C.
The resulting value shall be applied to upgrading the
size of tree plantings associated with the project. Trees
232
for which no tree report has been required pursuant to
Section 12.12.050D shall not be subject to appraisal or
replacement by value.
G. Tree Replacement Waiver. In no case shall an ap-
plicant for a tree removal permit be required to replace
or otherwise pay for the value of any tree which:
1. The city has directed the applicant to remove so
that a public street may be constructed along an alignment
determined or approved by the city engineer or adequate
line -of -sight distance may be achieved in order to assure
public safety; or
2. Removal was necessitated due to the health of the
tree. (Ord. 107 § 1, 1989; Ord. 101 § I (part), 1988)
12.12.080 Tree removal permits — Standards
for grant or denial.
Determination by the city to issue a tree removal permit,
shall be based upon the following criteria:
A. The condition of the tree with respect to disease,
danger of collapse of all or any portion of the tree, prox-
imity to an existing structure, or interference with utility
services or, in the case of a native oak tree, interference
with an addition to an existing single - family detached home;
B. The necessity to remove a historic tree, native oak
tree or mature tree in order to construct improvements which
allow economic enjoyment of the property;
C. The number of historic trees, native oak trees and
mature trees existing in the neighborhood;
D. Good forestry practices, i.e., the number of healthy
mature trees that a given parcel of land will support;
E. Whether or not removal of the tree is necessary
to construct required improvement within the public street
right -of -way or within a flood control or utility right -of-
way; and
F. The suitability of the tree species for use in that
location. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.12.090 Exemptions.
The following are exempt from the provisions of this
chapter:
A. Emergency Situation. Cases of emergency where
the director of community services or his or her designee,
or any member of a law enforcement agency or the Ventura
County Fire Protection District, in the performance of his
or her duties, determines that a tree poses an imminent
threat to the public safety, or general welfare. If conditions
and circumstances permit, the public official shall consult
with the director of community development, or his or her
designee, prior to ordering the removal of any mature tree;
B. Traffic Engineer. Removal or relocation of trees
necessary to obtain adequate line -of -sight distances as
required by the city traffic engineer;
v v v.•aJ
C. Public Improvement Damage. Removal of trees
from within public right -of -way, which in the opinion of
the director of public works, or his or her designee, will
cause damage to existing public improvements;
D. Public Utility Damage. Actions taken for the pro-
tection of existing electrical power or communication lines
or other property of a public utility;
E. Trees for Sale. Trees planted, grown or held for
sale by a private individual or nursery;
F. Pruning and Trimming. Pruning or trimming which
does not endanger the life of the tree. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part),
1988)
12.12.100 Damaging of trees prohibited.
No person shall injure, deface or scar any historic tree,
native oak tree or mature tree. (Ord. 101 § 1 (part), 1988)
12.12.110 Liability.
Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to impose any
liability or duty upon the city or upon any of its officers,
employees or agents, nor to relieve the owner and occupant
of any private property from the duty to keep historic trees,
mature trees or native oak trees upon such property or under
his control, in a safe condition. (Ord. 101 § i (part), 1988)
12.12.120 Appeals.
A. Decisions relating to proposals for urban develop-
ment which are made by the director of community develop-
ment may be appealed to the planning commission. Such
appeal procedures shall be those specified in Article 11
of the zoning ordinance of the city.
B. Decisions relating to single parcels which are made
by the director of community services may be appealed
to the parks and recreation commission under its normal
procedures of appeal; however, in no event shall the fee
for appeal exceed fifty dollars ($50.00). (Ord. 101 § i
(part), 1988)
12.12.130 Violation — Penalty.
Violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 101
§ 1 (part), 1988)
Chapter 12.16
PARKS
Sections:
ehicles d horses, riding
12.16.010
Hours of operatio .
12.16.020
Animal control.
12.16.030
Littering prohib' ed.
12.16.040
Alcoholic bever ges prohibited.
12.16.050
Excessive noise rohibited.
12.16.060
Public conduc
12.16.070
Duplicating k s prohibited.
12.16.080
Camping and lodging prohibited.
12.16.090
Vending pro ibited.
12.16.100
Fire control.
12.16.110
Damaging property
12.16.120 Fireworks Ond weapons
12.16.130
ehicles d horses, riding
a imals nd other conveyances.
12.16.140
R uire ent and enforcement of
pa re tai permits.
12.16.150
Re it ment and enforcement of
att on permits.
12.16.160
Othe prohibited activities.
12.16.010 Hours peration.
No person shall ente o remain in any public park,
public open space or pu is r reation grounds during the
hours of ten (10:00) p. . to ix (6:00) a.m. without the
authorization of the cit manag r or his/her designee. (Ord.
248 § 1 (part), 1998: rd. 81 1 (part), 1986)
12.16.020 An mal contr 1.
No person owni g or having harge, care, custody or
control of any dog livestock or o er animal shall cause,
permit or allow th same to be loo a or run at large upon
any public park, ublic open spac or public recreation
grounds unless ch animal is restr 'ned by a substantial
chain or leash t exceeding six (6) eet in length and is
in the charge, are, custody or cont 1 of a competent
person. Additi nally, any person ownin or having charge,
care, custody or control of any dog, li estock or other
animal shall responsible for debris, litte or contaminants
caused by su h animal and any neglect of s ch responsibili-
ty shall be onstrued as littering, as defi ed in Section
12.16.030 f this chapter. (Ord. 248 § 1 (p t), 1998: Ord.
81 § 1 (p t), 1986)
12.16.0301 Littering prohibited.
No person shall drop or deposit refuse, trash, hazardous
233 (Moorpark 12 -95)
V V y . -0 G
ATTACHMENT C
CITY OF MOO"ARK
(805) 529 -6864 FAX: 529 -8270
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
City Ordinance: 12.12.070. M.M.C.
Date: Time: a.m. p.m. Permit #2 0 6
Name:
Address of Tree:
Tree Location: O -Front O-Back O -Side
Number of Trees for Removal:
Property:O- Private O -HOA O- Commercial 0-other
Reason for Removal: Section: 12.12.080. A - B
Inspected By:
Section 12.12.080 Removal Granted:
l.A. Tree condition: Diseased or in danger of collapsing in the
proximity to an existing Structure.
2.A. Tree interference: with utility service above or under-
ground.
_3.A. Tree interference: with an addition to a Existing single
family detached home NATIVE OAK TREE ONLY
_4.B Required removal to construct improvement which
allow economic enjoyment of the property
Section 12.12.080. Removal Denied:
_ i . C. Number of Historic trees, Native Oak and mature
trees existing in the neighborhood Below Minimum.
2.1). Number of health mature trees that a given parcel of land
will support is Below Minimum.
3. No Condition Exist to Warrant Removal.
Tree Replacement Required O -Yes O -No
Number of Replacement trees :
Permit Expires On: /_ /,
Teach
HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
fliIn
llallp
ATTACHMENT ._
November 21, 2001
Mayor Patrick Hunter
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
FROM: Errol Hale, Board President
RE: Eucalyptus tree thinning
Dear Sirs,
Thank you both very much for meeting with Greg Moses, from GM Management, and me on October
19, 2001 to discuss reducing the number of eucalyptus trees in our HOA common area. As we
explained at that meeting, our development has an over abundance (131) of these trees. While we
do not want to diminish the beauty of our neighborhood by removing all, or too many of these mature
trees, we earnestly need to remove some of them. There are forty -nine other trees in our common
area, nearly all of which are large, mature trees.
These trees that predate our neighborhood and served as windbreaks for the groves that once stood
where our homes are now, were left by the developer. There are four reasons we feel it prudent to
remove some of these trees. 1) Many are planted dangerously close to homes, posing a safety and
property damage issue from falling branches and debris, especially in windy weather. 2) Many are
planted too close to each other. 3) As you know, eucalyptus trees are extremely messy, especially in
windy weather, unnecessarily raising maintenance costs. 4) They disallow adjacent homeowners to
plant in their own yards because the trees block sunlight and constantly drop leaves, pods and bark.
Enclosed is a map of our project with all the trees marked. The trees marked in yellow are not a
problem. Most of these are not Eucalyptus trees. The trees marked in pink are the trees in question.
I have designated different areas in which these trees stand for the sake of explanation. Please see
Tree Table.
Page 2 of 2
We are not desiring or able to remove these trees all at once. We do tree trimming on about one -third
to one — fourth of the trees in the development each year. We desire permission to remove the trees
in question as we come to those sections in the next three to four years.
As for replacing the downed trees, it would be impractical to replace these trees on a one to one
basis. There is simply not enough area in our development to plant this many trees. As we discussed
landscaping the parkway along Peach Hill Road, we discussed allowing this landscape improvement
including trees, to serve as replacements for the trees we wish to remove.
In addition to permission to remove some of our eucalyptus trees, we request that the landscaping
along Peach Hill Road be allowed to serve as the replacement for the eucalyptus trees that must be
removed.
All work will be contracted with licensed contractors who will need to be shown the city's letter of
approval of this request.
Thank you for your attention to this pressing issue. If you have any questions, I can be reached at
(805) 529 -5577 (work) or (805) 523 -7692 (home).
Sincerely yours,
Errol Hale
Board President
��
Tree Table
Section Description
# existing - # to be removed = # to remain
A
Planted extremely close together, very close to homes
and homeowners' fences.
23 -14 =9
Planted close together, very close to homes and
homeowners' fences.
12 -6 =6
B
C
Planted close to homes and homeowner's fences.
4-2 =2
D
Most of these are planted very close together, and to
homeowners' fences. Homeowners along Quail
Summit cannot plant anything in their back yards
because they never get sun.
37 -19 =18
E
Close together and to homeowners' fences.
12 -6 =6
F
Close together and to homeowners' fences.
8 -4 =4
G
Close together and to a home and homeowner's fence.
17 -7 =10
H
Close together.
18 -6 =12
Total number of existing Eucalyptus trees — the number we wish 131 -64 =67
to remove = the number that will remain. We are requesting
permission to remove less than half of these trees.
v ♦.o v' v
TO
From:
DATE:
CITY OF MOORPARK
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council
ITEM D•
cAT,TT"0RN'1A
AC Tn 3 s-
'
Bl..._
Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manager
March 25, 2002 (Meeting of 4/3/02)
SUBJECT: Review and Discuss feasibility of increasing
operations at the SR -118 Truck Inspection Station
to a 24 -hour basis.
SUMMARY:
Councilmember Millhouse requested that the feasibility of
maintaining operations on a 24 -hour basis at the State Road
118 Truck Inspection Stations west of Moorpark be discussed
by the City Council.
DISCUSSION:
The California Highway Patrol currently staffs the SR 118
Weigh Station during daylight hours with commercial
personnel on Monday through Friday. Weekend operations are
scheduled occasionally as conditions dictate. The
facilities on SR -118 are not equipped with lighting or
other essential equipment necessary for operating during
non - daylight hours. The Department does not have the
budgetary authority to increase these operating hours. The
personnel cost for an 8 -hour shift $ 691.68 itemized as
follows:
1 Patrol Officer @ $ 55.74/hr. (8 hr. day = 445.92
1 Commercial Vehicle Inspection Officer @ $30.72/hr.
(8 hr. day = $245.76)
The Department's recent efforts to obtain grant funding to
support supplemental commercial enforcement through the
Office of Traffic Safety were not successful. An
application for assistance for the SR -118 Task Force has
City Council Agenda Report
SR 118 Inspection Station
April 3, 2002
Page 2
been submitted recently by Supervisor MikelIs Office. The
application is requesting funds for the Task Force to
enhance commercial enforcement in Moorpark and along the
SR -118 Corridor.
RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss the feasibility of increased commercial traffic
enforcement in Moorpark including increasing operating
hours at the SR -118 Inspection Facility.
Attachments: June 2001 Correspondence with CHP
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
May 30, 2001
Captain Scott MacGregor, Area Commander
Ventura Area
California Highway Patrol
4656 Valentine Road.
Ventura, CA 93003
Subject: Operating Hours for SR -118 Inspection Station
Dear Captain -Icrgx >
The City of Moorpark requests that serious consideration be
given to opening the westbound SR -118 inspection station on
a 24 -hour basis. The truck traffic through Moorpark is
increasing daily. Our streets and SR -118 are not designed
to handle these heavy trucks.
As evidenced by the recent directed enforcement activity on
May 11 and 12, we believe that the very presence of the
inspection facility causes operators to think twice about
using SR -118 if their destination gives them a choice. The
fact that the station is not consistently staffed weakens
this deterrent effort.
We fully understand that budget limitations currently
prohibit 24 -hour manning of this station, however the city
feels increasing the operational hours should be a high
priority. We urge the California Highway Patrol to seek
whatever means necessary to provide expanded operating
hours for this station.
Any assistance you can provide in this regard would be most
appreciated.
Sincerely,
f �
s!
Ptrick Hunter
i
Mayor
:7 nroil`I! ul INTFR GLINT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS KEITH F MILLHCUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Cpt. Scott MacGregor
California Highway Patrol
May 30, 2001
Page 2
Cc: Honorable City Council
Steven Kueny, City Manager
Senator Tom McClintock
Assemblyman Tony Strickland
Lt. Bruce Moncher, Commander
Conejo Inspection Facility
.('ta 'n d % ",-� e + A
State of California— Business, Transportation and Housing Agency GRAY DAVIS, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Conejo Inspection Facility
4001 U.S. HWY. 101/ P.O. Box 187
Thousand Oaks, Ca. 91320
(805) 498 -3853
(800) 735 -2929 (TT /TDD)
(800) 735 -2922 (Voice)
June 12, 2001
File No.: 766.9860
The Honorable Patrick Hunter
Mayor, City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93020
Dear Mayor Hunter:
RECEIVED
JU ± IUU
...,,.a �yE' K 5 f;FFr',I�'fR1ENT
I am writing in response to your letter expressing concern over the increase in truck traffic
traveling through the City of Moorpark. I share your concern regarding the safety of commercial
vehicles traveling on SR -118, and would like to take a few moments to explain what the Conejo
Inspection Facility can do to ensure commercial vehicle operators are carefully regulated.
As you know, the facilities on SR -118 are not equipped with lighting or other essential
equipment necessary for operation during darkness. However, whenever possible during the
summer months I will modify the hours of operation concerning the inspection facilities to
ensure maximum effectiveness during daylight hours. In addition to the extended hours of
operation, I will work very closely with Captain Scott MacGregor, commander of the Ventura
office, to ensure continued focus on commercial enforcement during the periods I am unable to
staff the inspection sites. Additionally, efforts are being made to obtain grant funding through the
California Office of Traffic Safety, which would provide means for additional commercial
enforcement along the SR -118 corridor.
I hope I have sufficiently addressed your concerns and look forward to working with you in the
future to make our highways safer. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at the address or telephone number listed above
Sincerely,
r '
B. D. W HER, Lieutenant
Commander
Conejo Inspection Facility
flex. •-
your
Power
BE ENERGY
EFFICIENT
State of California — Business, Transportation and Housing Agency GRAY DAVIS, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
4656 Valentine Rd
Ventura, CA 93003
(805) 477 -4100
(800) 735 -2929 (TT /TDD)
(800) 735 -2922 (Voice)
June 26, 2001
File No.: 765.11446.Moorpark
The Honorable Patrick Hunter
Mayor, City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA. 93020
Dear Mayor Hunter: '
Y'- 4�
I am writing in response to your recent letter, in which you requested that consideration
be given to opening the westbound SR -118 inspection station on a 24 -hour basis. I
have discussed your concerns directly with the commander of our Conejo Inspection
Facility, Lieutenant Bruce Moncher. As you may already know, both inspection stations
on SR -118 are presently staffed Monday through Friday by commercial personnel from
Lieutenant Moncher's command. It is my understanding that Lieutenant Moncher has
already written back to you with his intent to maximize deployment at both locations on
SR -118 during daylight hours this summer.
It may also interest you to know that we are in the process of applying for a grant
through the Office of Traffic Safety to be used on the SR -118 corridor. If approved, the
grant would provide the means for additional commercial enforcement on SR -118, as
well as additional commercial inspections. I will certainly keep you apprised of the
status of that grant application.
Let me assure you that I share in your desire to make the SR -118 corridor as safe as
possible. To that end, my command is currently participating in two new commercial
programs, which you may find of interest. The first program is entitled "Road Share
2001," in which personnel assigned to both the Ventura and Moorpark CHP facilities
are deployed two days each week with the primary focus on commercial safety (e.g.,
"rules of the road" violations). Additionally, I am currently deploying added resources
throughout the county on an overtime basis, including SR -118, through a commercial
traffic safety grant entitled "Join us on the Road to Safety." It is my hope that these two
programs, coupled with our existing patrol efforts will help improve commercial safety
on SR -118 and throughout the county.
Flex � ,-
your��s .•
E F F I C I E N T
Mayor Patrick Hunter
Page 2
June 26, 2001
Thank you for providing me with the opportunity to address your concerns. Should you
have any additional questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to
call me at (805) 477 -4100.
Sincerely,
f
D. S. MACGREGOR, Captain
Commander
Ventura Area
.,..:
C;TV 0� r'IT
"��±?TF,1F2C, Trf*!z'JT
,, -1
tnri '
- '9cr ITEM
of r
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
rY: -- '"loorpark, California July 18, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on July 18, 2001, in the Council Chambers of said City
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Pro Tem Harper called the meeting to order at 6:43
p.m.
2. INVOCATION:
Pastor Tony Amatangelo, Life Spring Community Church, gave
the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Councilmember Roseann Mikos led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Mikos, Millhouse and Mayor Pro Tem
Harper.
Absent: Councilmember Wozniak and Mayor Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager; Dana Shigley,
Director of Administrative Services, Wayne
Loftus, Director of Community Development;
Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Mary
Lindley, Director of Community Services;
Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert
LeMay, Sheriff's Department; John Brand,
Senior Management Analyst, Nancy Burns,
Senior Management Analyst; Deborah
Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City
Clerk; and La -Dell VanDeren, Deputy City
Clerk.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Recognition of Sergeant Ron Nelson, Moorpark Police
Department.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2
July 18, 2001
Mayor Pro Tem Harper presented Sergeant Ron Nelson
with a plaque in recognition of his service to the
City of Moorpark.
B. Ventura County Fair Poster Presentation by Charles
Schwabauer.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper introduced Charles Schwabauer,
who presented the City with the 2001 Ventura County
Fair Poster.
C. Introduction of New Employee, Feljay Ugalde, Planning
Technician I, Community Development Department.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper introduced Feljay Ugalde,
Planning Technician I, in the Community Development
Department.
D. Introduction of New Employee, Melody Johnston,
Information Systems Supervisor, Administrative
Services Department.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper introduced Melody Johnston,
Information Systems Supervisor, in the Administrative
Services Department.
E. City Manager's Monthly Report.
Mr. Kueny introduced Captain Robert LeMay, Chief of
Police, Ventura County Sheriff's Department, who
provided an update on the Police Department
activities, including the acquisition of two new
vehicles, status of interviewing for vacant positions
in the department, and the success of the Police
Department Volunteer Program.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Larry Janss, 1408 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd. Thousand Oaks,
discussed the former Moorpark Playhouse property and gave
an update on his efforts to reopen the theater.
Michelle Judd, a Moorpark resident, stated she is a recent
graduate of the Ventura County Leadership Academy and
requested the City Council's support of the Academy
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
July 18, 2001
programs. She discussed the type of training received, the
cost, the nomination procedure, and scholarships that are
available. She also provided the website address for the
academy.
Gerald Goldstein, a Moorpark resident discussed cleanup at
his property.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to
convene the Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7:08 p.m. The
City Council meeting reconvened at 7:12 p.m.
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
Councilmember Millhouse requested Item 10.I. be moved to
the first item under Presentation /Action /Discussion.
Councilmember Mikos requested Item ll.E. be pulled from the
Consent Calendar.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper announced that Item 10. D. and Item
10.E would be discussed together.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos
seconded the motion to adopt the revised agenda. The motion
carried by voice vote 3 -0; Mayor Hunter and Councilmember
Wozniak absent.
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Councilmember Mikos discussed the Hidden Creek Project
legal rulings and stated there is no further opportunity
for Appeal. She requested a future agenda item regarding
the Zoning Ordinance for the Hidden Creek Ranch property
that is not in compliance with the General Plan. She also
requested that staff contact the County regarding updating
and correcting the County Geographical Information Systems
(GIS) Maps pertaining to City boundaries. She also
announced her scheduled attendance at a Mayor's and Council
Members Executive Forum in Northern California.
Councilmember Millhouse discussed the disappearance of
Megan Barroso. He thanked several persons and agencies that
were involved in setting up an account for donations
towards a reward fund. He announced that a website had been
Minutes of the City Council
Mnnr_nark. California Page 4
July 18, 2001
set up. He stated the Ventura County Sheriff's Department
now has a $25,000 reward.
Councilmember Harper requested a future agenda item for
staff to provide a report regarding establishing
requirements for use of photovoltaic's as they pertain to
energy conservation.
9. PUBLIC HEARING:
A. Consider Final Review and Changes to the Engineer's
Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and Adoption of a
Resolution Confirming the Assessments for Fiscal Year
2001/2002. Staff Recommendation: Open the public hearing,
receive testimony, close the public hearing, and take the
following actions: 1) Approve the changes to the
Engineer's Report summarized in Section J of the agenda
report; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1865 making
certain changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments
for Fiscal Year 2001/02.
Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report and noted some minor
changes to the engineering report.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper opened the public hearing; there
being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Pro Tem Harper
closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember
Mikos seconded a motion to: 1) Approve the changes to the
Engineer's Report summarized in Section J of the agenda
report; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1865 making certain
changes to AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments for Fiscal
Year 2001/02. The motion carried by voice vote of 3 -0, Mayor
Hunter and Councilmember Wozniak absent.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
I. Consider Establishing Reward Related to Missing Person
Case (Megan Barroso). Staff Recommendation: Direct
staff as deemed appropriate.
Councilmember Millhouse discussed a reward for
information leading to the safe return of Megan
Barroso. He suggested using the same language that the
Ventura County Sheriff's Department uses in these
Cifi 4f1, eft 0 A,
Minutes of the City Council
Mooroark, California Page 5
July 18, 2001
situations. He suggested the City of Moorpark donate
an amount of $10,000.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Captain LeMay
replied that the Sheriff's Department supports and
commends the taking of the action to set up a reward.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny replied
that there is not a precedent for the City to follow
regarding a dollar amount or setting up a reward.
Councilmember Millhouse stated he had checked with the
Sheriff's Department and the $10,000 amount was
suggested as an appropriate amount.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Kueny replied
that the reward monies would come from the City's
General Fund Reserve.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember
Mikos seconded a motion that the City authorize a reward in
the amount of $10,000 using the same terms and language of
the Sheriffs Department's reward for information regarding
the disappearance of Megan Barroso. The motion carried by
voice vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Wozniak
absent.
A. Consider a Presentation by the Child Care Plannin
Council of Ventura County.
Barbara Loczi, 570 Airport Way, Camarillo, Consultant
for the Ventura County Child Care Planning Council,
spoke about the agency's five -year plan. She discussed
the needs of the Child Care Council and the needs of
those that the organization serves. She asked the City
of Moorpark to include childcare language in its
general plan, which would encourage inclusion of
childcare needs in the City's plans. She also
requested that one councilmember be appointed as the
City's liaison with the Child Care Council.
Petra Nagerl, 570 Airport Way, Camarillo, Consultant
for the Ventura County Child Care Planning Council,
stated that Patty McWaters has worked with other
cities in Ventura County as a child care resource.
Minutes of the City Council Jul 18, 2001
Moorpark, California Page 6 Y
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that there is a definite
need for affordable childcare. He commended the Child
Care Planning Council on their five -year plan. He
suggested they contact a representative from both
Moorpark and Ventura Colleges.
B. Consider Teen Council Appointments and Amendments to
Teen Council Guidelines. Staff Recommendation. 1)
Adopt amendments to the Teen Council Guidelines
consistent with the staff report and direct staff to
include the Teen Council Guidelines in the next update
of the City Council Policies Resolution; and 2) Make
appointments to the Teen Council for a one -year term
to begin on July 1, 2001.
BY CONSENSUS, the Council agreed to continue this item to
the August 1, 2001, City Council meeting.
C. Consider a Re nest to Modify Condition of Approval No. 1
of Conditional Use Permit No 94 -01 of Moorpark Country.
Club Estates to Reduce the Number of Holes of Play for
the Required Golf Courses from Thirty -six (36) Holes to
Twenty -seven (27) Holes and Addendum No. 4 to the
Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH
p
#9408175) - Toll Bros. Inc., Applicant. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Accept public comment; 2) Consider
the request to modify the number of holes of play of the
golf courses as conditioned under CUP 94 -1, and approve
Addendum No. 4 to the project certified Environmental
Impact Report; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -
granting Minor Modification No. 3 to the Country Club
Estates Project.
Mr. Loftus suggested that the staff report be deferred
to the meeting of August 1, 2001.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper suggested that any comments or
testimony be received from those wishing to speak.
Craig Messi, Toll Brothers, 7000 Grimes Canyon Road,
Moorpark, discussed the project. Mr. Messi requested the
City Council consider the modification, which will
increase the undisturbed area to a total of 226 acres.
He stated the approved plan only preserved 98 acres as
undisturbed by grading.
^w\n tT �
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 7
July 18, 2001
John Michler, land planner 1470 Jamboree Road, #200,
Newport Beach, discussed the reduction in grading and
design modifications of the residential and the golf
course areas. He stated they have modified the
residential element and redesigned the area to the golf
course frontage homes. He explained the reduction from
36 holes to 27 holes of golf.
Councilmember Mikos stated that she is in favor of less
grading.
Mr. Michler stated that the reduction in grading totaled
6 million cubic yards. He added that reducing from 36 to
27 holes makes the golf courses more economically
feasible.
Pete Peters, a Moorpark resident, stated that he would
wait to speak before the full Council.
William K. Alkire, William Charles Group, 165 High
Street, Moorpark, stated he is the Manager at Tierra
Rejada Golf Course. He stated the reduction to 27 holes
from 36 holes makes sense in terms of the course
profitability. He commented that a reduction in costs of
construction and operation and the number of rounds
played could still generate 800 of the same income as 36
holes.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Messi replied
that with regard to Mr. Alkire's estimates, he did not
have the true dollar numbers. He stated an analysis was
done recently, and there are 20 golf courses within 5
miles of this site and 5 more golf courses in the
planning stage.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Messi replied
that when the project was acquired, Toll Brothers was
not originally to be the builder of the golf courses. He
added that through the purchase agreement for the
residential areas, Toll Brothers also acquired the golf
courses and an updated analysis determined that the 27
hole course was more feasible.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Messi replied that Toll
Brothers would like the golf courses to be under
construction by the Spring of 2002 and that they would
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 8
July 18, 2001
like a decision as soon as possible. The Spring 2002
timeline would give them a chance to be in compliance
with their development agreement date for their first
golf course opening.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Messi replied
that if a decision is made by the City Council at the
August 1 meeting, it would not cause a significant
problem.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated he has had a real concern
about the amount of golf facilities in the area in
relation to the number of golfers in Moorpark.
Councilmember Mikos stated she was a vocal opponent of
the original 36 -hole golf course project. She also
stated the redesigned project is better for the
environment and that the reduction in grading makes
economic sense and environmental sense.
Councilmember Millhouse stated his concurrence with the
statements of Mayor Pro Tem Harper and Councilmember
Mikos.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to
continue this item to the August 1, 2001, City Council
meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper announced that Items 10.D and 10.E
would be taken together.
D. Consider Traffic Issues on Sierra Avenue and Shasta
Avenue [Moorpark Estates]. Staff Recommendation:
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
E. Consider Resolution Providing for the Installation of
Stop Signs at Designated Entrances to the
Intersections of Sierra Avenue /Shasta Avenue [North];
Sierra Avenue/ Shasta Avenue [South]; and Sierra
Avenue /Lassen Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -1866.
Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report on both items.
Councilmember Mikos thanked the residents of Moorpark
Estates who brought the issue to her attention.
V `v' v' h �s
Minutes of the City Council Jul 18, 2001
Moorpark, California Page 9 Y
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated
that the letter to Mission Bell Plaza recommended
terminating access and that he and Mr. Kueny met with
the property manager and the owner with regard to
speed bumps in the plaza parking lot, and the property
manager and the owner seemed receptive.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert
replied that staff is recommending stop signs and
asked for more direction from the Council regarding
the Gisler Road access.
Randy Baker, a Moorpark resident, spoke about mild
traffic and the impact from traffic on the Lassen
Avenue entry. He discussed the three possible options
that were listed in the letter that was sent to the
residents of the area and noted that stop signs were
the least desirable of the options presented. He asked
the Council to consider the other two options of
either an opening of Gisler Road or the closing of
Lassen Avenue.
Douglas Frazer, a Moorpark resident, stated his
concurrence with the comments of the prior speaker and
stated that some of the problems were generated when
the shopping center was built. He discussed concerns
about the potential for increased congestion and
accidents if stop signs are installed and difficulty
in backing out of driveways. He also asked why the
City bus makes multiple trips through the Shasta and
Lassen Avenues intersection.
Oscar Barrera, a Moorpark resident, discussed traffic
at the intersection caused by traffic from the school
and during Little League games. He stated heavy
traffic from shopping center has slowed down somewhat,
but the speed of cars using the street is a problem.
He stated his opposition to closing Lassen Avenue and
would like to see the street left open as a one -way
street.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Ms. Lindley
replied that the bus goes through the shopping center
and exits at Lassen Avenue, so it can stop for
passengers in the Estates neighborhood. She noted that
having the bus stop on Los Angeles Avenue presents
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 10
July 18, 2001
more of a potential traffic problem, and it appears to
be safer if the bus stops on Shasta Avenue as opposed
to Los Angeles Avenue.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Ms. Lindley
stated the bus pick up can be done at the center
parking lot rather than in the neighborhood, but it
reduces the visibility of the bus and increase the
distance for those who walk to the bus stop. Ms.
Lindley indicated that staff could take a look at that
change and report back to the Council on the effect.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley stated
that if Lassen Avenue were closed, the bus would
probably not go through the Moorpark Estates
neighborhood.
Councilmember Millhouse stated his concern about
moving the bus stop and increasing the distance to the
bus stop.
Mr. Kueny suggested that staff take a look at the
issue and also analyze a turnout just west of the
intersection of Shasta and Los Angeles Avenues. He
stated staff would need to analyze how many riders are
involved to see if such a change would be cost
effective.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Captain LeMay
responded that the Police Department does not see an
enforcement issue regarding speeding in the area. He
stated that continual enforcement is not merited;
however, the Police Department is using a high
visibility approach to the issue, including police
patrol and use of the speed board. He stated his
opinion that this is an engineering problem versus an
enforcement problem.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated
the traffic volumes are not enough to cause a backup
in the residential driveways. He stated the closure of
Lassen Avenue is the most obvious solution, but that a
number of residents are opposed to that, because they
use the left turn on Leta Yancy Road at the Los
Angeles Avenue intersection. He noted that
inconvenience to the residents is a problem and stated
N-0 v %,, a 6
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 11
July 18, 2001
that he is opposed to using residential streets as
entrances to shopping centers.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated
that connecting Gisler Road to the shopping center
would transfer the problem.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated
that the stop signs could be installed and when school
resumes traffic counts can be done to see if they are
effective. He stated if a stop sign is installed on
Shasta Avenue, one would also be needed on Sierra
Avenue, because the people who use those routes will
change to avoid the stop signs. He also stated that if
staff determines that the stop signs are not working,
they could be removed.
Mr. Gilbert stated that stop signs should be placed
where warranted by traffic patterns and needs, not
just based on requests, due to potential liability
exposure. He noted that removal of stop signs can also
be a liability concern.
Mr. Kueny stated his recommendation to go forward with
the stop signs.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated his concern about the use
of stop signs to mitigate issues of right of way and
that he would prefer the use of speed bumps instead.
He recommended having the Transportation and Streets
Committee discuss this issue further.
Mr. Kueny suggested that when a signal is installed at
Shasta Avenue, allowing residents to turn left onto
Los Angeles Avenue, then closing the shopping center
entry and the stop signs could be reconsidered.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that the residents
wanted the City to take action now and that stop signs
would be a good start.
Councilmember Mikos stated that when the light is
installed at Shasta Avenue residents would support
closing access to shopping center. She stated that
the Committee did not have anything further to discuss
1..�
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 12
July 18, 2001
at this time and that she didn't support speed humps
on City streets.
In response to City Council questions regarding the
Shasta Avenue signal, Mr. Kueny recommended that the
Council receive and file the staff report, direct
staff to work on expediting the traffic signal
installation at Shasta Avenue, and approve the
installation of stop signs.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember
Millhouse seconded a motion to receive and file the staff
report and directed staff to work on expediting the traffic
signal installation at Shasta Avenue. The motion carried by
voice vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Wozniak
absent.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember
Millhouse seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001-
1866 approving the installation of stop signs at designated
entrances to the intersections of Sierra Avenue /Shasta
Avenue [North]; Sierra Avenue /Shasta Avenue [South]; and
Sierra Avenue /Lassen Avenue. The motion carried by voice
vote 2 -1, Councilmember Harper opposed, and Mayor Hunter
and Councilmember Wozniak absent.
F. Consider Status Report and Revised Time Line for the
Completion of the Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP)
Phase II Restroom /Concession /Storage Facility. Staff
Recommendation: Approve the revised time line for the
design and construction of the AVCP Phase II Restroom
Facility as outlined in the agenda report.
Ms. Lindley gave the staff report.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley
replied that Specific Plan No. 2 would have its own
park.
Councilmember Millhouse discussed several reasons for
the delay of the restroom facility, including water
line and sewer pump issues.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms. Lindley
stated the total cost for planned facilities could be
C,n ,s•n /, 0 J
vv v
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 13 July 18, 2001
approximately $5,000,000 including the pool, road,
pavilions, restrooms, and landscaping.
Douglas Shoop, a Moorpark resident, stated that the
Moorpark Packers do not have portable restrooms in
their budget for the 2001 season and given the
anticipated delay of the completion of the restroom
facilities, he asked the City Council to provide
portable restrooms for their use.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Ms. Shigley
replied that the estimated cost for two portable
restroom units would be $800 to $1,200, including
cleaning.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Kueny replied
that the City Council could authorize staff to return
with a budget allocation for the portable restrooms at
the next City Council meeting.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember
Mikos seconded the motion to approve the revised time line
for the design and construction of the AVCP Phase II
Restroom Facility and directed staff to return with a
budget allocation item at the August 1, 2001, meeting for
temporary portable restrooms. The motion carried by voice
vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Wozniak absent.
G. Consider Award of Contract for Design of the Community
Aquatics Facility to Martinez & Amador Architects,
Inc. and Adoption of Resolution. Staff Recommendation:
1) Award a contract to Martinez & Amador Architects,
Inc. in the amount of $164,000 and authorize the City
Manager to execute said contract; and 2) Adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -1867, amending the FY 2001/2002
Budget, allocating $200,000 for the design of the
Community Aquatics Facility. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
Ms. Lindley gave the staff report.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that he and Mayor Pro
Tem Harper are on the committee regarding the pool. He
stated the Moorpark Unified School District (MUSD)
does not yet have the budget available to participate
in the pool costs and that the City Council should
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 14 July 18, 2001
consider how the MUSD could participate in the project
in the future.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that absent a bond issue,
the MUSD may not be able to participate at any level
and discussions at the subcommittee level were not
positive. He stated the City should look at this as a
City project and continue going forward on it.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley
replied that the reduced price of the bid would still
achieve the design of the aquatics facility.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember
Mikos seconded the motion to: 1) award a contract to
Martinez & Amador Architects, Inc. in the amount of
$164,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute said
contract; and 2) adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1867, amending
the FY 2001/2002 Budget, and allocating $200,000 for the
design of the Community Aquatics Facility. The motion
carried by roll call vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and
Councilmember Wozniak absent.
H. Consider Ado tion of an Interim Ordinance Enacting for
a Period of Forty -five Days a Moratorium on the
Issuance of Permits for Construction or Placement of
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities in the City,
and Declaring the Urgency Thereof. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Interim Ordinance No.
(ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED: 4 /5ths affirmative vote)
Mayor Pro Tem Harper suggested taking any public
comments and then tabling the item to a later meeting
date.
Councilmember Millhouse discussed his reasoning for
asking this to be placed on the agenda. He discussed
potential projects and the need for comprehensive
planning about where wireless facilities should be
placed. He stated he would like to see the Planning
Commission be more involved in the decisions.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to table
this item to later in the meeting.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 15
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
July 18, 2001
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse
seconded the Motion for approval of the Consent Calendar, with
Item ll.E. pulled for individual consideration. The motion
carried by roll call vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and Councilmember
Wozniak absent.
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of First Special Meetin
of Mav 30, 2001.
Consider App of Minutes of Special Meeting of
June 20, 2001.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of
June 27, 2001.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register - July 4, 2001.
Manual Warrants 106197 - 106199 & $ 41,528.54
106200 - 106202 &
106302 - 106303
Voided Warrants 105986 & 106086
(Pentamation additional
remittance copies) 106300
Payroll Liability 106188 - 106196
Warrants
$ (625.95)
$ 15,985.86
Regular Warrants 106203 - 106297 $230,072.03
Staff Recommendation: Approve the Warrant Register.
C. Consider Approval of Warrant Register - July 18, 2001.
Voided Warrants 104782 $(265,000.00)
Regular Warrants 106329 - 106466 $ 566,116.25
Staff Recommendation: Approve the Warrant Register.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 16
July 18, 2001
D. Consider a Resolution Authorizing the City's FY
2001/2002 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim.
Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1868,
authorizing the FY 2001/2002 Transportation
Development Act claim for the City of Moorpark,
authorizing the City Manager to sign the claim for
submittal to the Ventura County Transportation
Commission (VCTC). (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED).
F. Consider Report of Annual Development Agreement
Review, Established in Connection with Moorpark
Country Club Estates, Located Approximately 2,700 Feet
South of Broadway between Grimes Canyon Road and
Walnut Canyon Road (Tract 4928, Toll Brothers, Inc.) .
Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept the Director of
Community Development's Report and recommendation
that, on the basis of substantial evidence, Toll
Brothers, Inc. has complied in good faith with the
terms and conditions of the agreement; and 2) deem the
annual review process complete.
G. Consider Report of Annual Development Agreement
Review, Established in Connection with Residential
Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1, a 312 -unit
Apartment Project, Located on the West Side of
Moorpark Avenue, South of Los Angles Avenue and North
of the Arroyo Simi (Archstone Communities). Staff
Recommendation: 1) Accept the Director of Community
Development's Report and recommendation that, on the
basis of substantial evidence, Archstone Communities
has complied in good faith with the terms and
conditions of the agreement; and 2) deem the annual
review process complete.
H. Consider Report of Annual Development Agreement
Review, Established in Connection with Moorpark
Highlands Specific Plan No. 2, a Master Planned
Community, Located East of Walnut Canyon Road, North
of Charles Street (Tentative Tract 5045, Morrison-
Fount ainwood- Agoura). Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept
the Director of Community Development's Report and
recommendation that, on the basis of substantial
evidence, Morrison - Fountainwood- Agoura has complied in
good faith with the terms and conditions of the
agreement; and 2) deem the annual review process
complete.
C^d -,�*'
., v -0
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 17 July 18, 2001
I. Consider Resolution Extending Franchise Agreements for
Cable Television Services with Adelphia Communications
Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution
No. 2001 -1869 (Moorpark System).
J. Consider Resolution Extending Franchise Agreements for
Cable Television Services with Adelphia Communications
Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution
No. 2001 -1870 (Mountain Meadows System).
K. Consider Approval of the Engineer's Report for
Assessment District ADO1 -3 [Cabrillo Economic
Development Corporation) - Tentative Tract 5161].
Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1871
approving the Engineer's Report for AD01 -3 for FY
2001/02 and setting August 1, 2001, as the date of a
public hearing to consider the levy of the assessments
provided for in said Engineer's Report.
L. Consider Settlement Agreement with West Pointe Homes,
Inc Regarding Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map
4620. Staff Recommendation: Approve the Settlement
Agreement subject to final language approval of the
City Manager and City Attorney and authorize the Mayor
to execute it on behalf of the City.
M. Consider Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1872,
approving a Loan Agreement with the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency.
N. Consider an Agreement Regarding Acquisition of
Property Between Archstone Communities and the City of
Moorpark to Acquire Certain Real Property for Public
Street Purposes. (Residential Planned Development
(RPD) No. 97 -1; Archstone Communities). Staff
Recommendation: Approve Agreement regarding
Acquisition of Property subject to final language
approval of the City Manager and City Attorney, and
authorize the City Manager to sign it.
0. Consider Approval of Final Map for Phase 1 of Tract
4928 located East of Grimes Canyon Road and West of
Walnut Canyon Road (Toll Brothers, Inc.). Staff
Recommendation: 1) Approve Final Map for Phase 1 of
rvv ve.v
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 18
Tract 4928, including the offers
authorizing the abandonment of offers
access rights and easements shown
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
Map; and 3) Authorize recordation of
Phase 1 of Tract 4928.
July 18, 2001
of dedication
of dedication,
thereon; 2)
sign the Final
Final Map for
P. Consider Approval of Final Map for Phase 2 of Tract
4928 located East of Grimes Canyon Road and West of
Walnut Canyon Road (Toll Brothers, Inc.). Staff
Recommendation: 1) Approve Final Map for Phase 2 of
Tract 4928, including the offers of dedication,
rejecting the offer of dedication of the 41 feet wide
reservation for future road easement and authorizing
the abandonment of offers of dedication, access rights
and easements shown thereon; and 2) authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Final Map; and 3)
Authorize recordation of Final Map for Phase 2 of
Tract 4928.
The following item was pulled for individual consideration:
E. Consider City of Moorpark General Plan Annual Report -
Including Housing Element Progress Report for Year
2000. Staff Recommendation: Receive and File the
report.
Councilmember Mikos discussed an e -mail she had
transmitted to staff, which included her recommended
revisions.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Loftus stated
that there are alternatives to achieving the City's
fair share of the regional housing needs without
Specific Plan No. 8.
Councilmember Mikos stated it is important that staff
clarify what Mr. Loftus had stated in the report.
Councilmember Millhouse asked that the City Attorney
review the language proposed by Councilmember Mikos.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that he concurred with
continuing this item and having staff revise the
report.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 19 July 18, 2001
Mr. Kueny suggested that an alternative would be to
direct staff to incorporate the recommended revisions,
subject to final language approval of the City
Attorney, and to receive and file the report.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember
Millhouse seconded a motion to direct staff to incorporate
the recommended revisions, subject to final language
approval of the City Attorney, and to receive and file the
report.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that although he
seconded the motion he would like to see the revised
version.
Mr. Kueny suggested that the maker of the motion and
the second rescind the motion and then direct that the
item come back on the August 1 meeting Consent
Calendar.
Councilmembers Mikos and Millhouse concurred with
rescinding the motion.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to continue
the item to the August 1, 2001 meeting Consent Calendar,
and directed that the City Attorney review Councilmember
Mikos's requested language changes to the General Plan
Annual Report.
12. ORDINANCES:
None.
13. CLOSED SESSION:
None was held.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
H. Consider Adoption of an Interim Ordinance Enacting for
a Period of Forty -five Days a Moratorium on the
Issuance of Permits for Construction or Placement of
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities in the City,
and Declaring the Urgency Thereof. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Interim Ordinance No.
(ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED: 4 /5ths affirmative vote)
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 20 July 18, 2001
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to
continue this item to a Special Meeting to be held on July
19, 2001, at 6:30 p.m.
14. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by
voice vote 3 -0, Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Wozniak absent.
The time was 9:46 p.m.
v v v v •
ACT7 f-)"; .
"- MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
!� r
_ •r}t %orrlis December 19, 2001
py:
A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on December 19, 2001, in the Community Center of said
City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Pro Tem Mikos called the meeting to order at 6:00
p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Harper and Wozniak and Mayor
Pro Tem Mikos
Absent: Councilmember Millhouse and Mayor Hunter
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes,
City Attorney; Bradley Wohlenberg, Assistant
City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City
Manager; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant
to City Manager /City Clerk
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Increase to the Appropriation and Budget for
the Los Angeles Avenue Median Project [8025] to Fund
Additional Median Improvement Costs. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1921. (ROLL
CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
Mr. Kueny stated the staff report would be waived.
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember
Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1921.
The motion carried by roll call vote 3 -0, Councilmember
Millhouse and Mayor Hunter absent.
B. Consider Resolution Designating Sagewood Drive to be a
Through Street in the Vicinity of Timberdale Road, and
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2 December 19, 2001
Directing the Placement of a Stop Sign at the
Timberdale Road Entrance Thereto. Staff Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1922.
Mr. Kueny gave the staff report.
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember
Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1922
as amended to allow consideration of an additional stop
sign. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, Councilmember
Millhouse and Mayor Hunter absent.
5. CLOSED SESSION:
Mr. Kueny announced that two cases under Item 5.A., two
cases under Item 5.B., and Items S.C. and S.D. would be
discussed in closed session.
Mr. Montes announced that for the first case under Item
5.A., the facts and circumstances creating significant
exposure to litigation consist of State Housing and
Community Development (HCD) authority under State law
pertaining to Housing Element adoption.
Mr. Montes also announced that for the second case under
Item 5.A., the facts and circumstances creating significant
exposure to litigation consist of written communications
threatening litigation received from Mackenzie & Albritton
LLP, legal counsel representing AT &T Wireless, and dated
November 30, 2001, and December 5, 2001.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion
of two cases under Item 5.A., two cases under Item 5.9., and
Items S.C. and S.D. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0,
Councilmember Millhouse and Mayor Hunter absent. The time was
6:08 p.m.
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to
Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government
Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3 December 19, 2001
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO21825)
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO22256)
Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper and
Wozniak and Mayor Pro Tem Mikos; Steven Kueny, City
Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Bradley Wohlenberg,
Assistant City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City
Manager; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk.
Mr. Wohlenberg left the meeting at 6:27 p.m.
The Council reconvened into open session at 6:40 p.m. Mr.
Kueny stated that two cases under Item 5.A., two cases
under Item 5.B, and Items 5.C. and 5.D. were discussed and
that there was no action to report.
5. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Pro Tem Mikos adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
ITEM -- 1! - u •
t. �i,tnR�JA
CITY OF MOORPARK
WARRANT REGISTER Ac"'''' -
FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR
BY:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 03, 2002
SEQUENCE
From To
MANUAL, 108816 - 108821
WARRANTS
VOIDED 108697 & 108797 &
WARRANTS 108819
PAYROLL LIABILITY 108822 - 108827
WARRANTS
REGULAR 108828 - 108911 &
WARRANTS 108912 - 108949
TOTAL
AMOUNT
$ 2,573.00
$ (16,295.07)
$ (13,722.07)
$ 8,762.38
$ 21,353.25
$ 264,639.99
A'N o4
03/28/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
9/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND-
UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
100031100000
9241
KUENY, STEVEN
N
03/19/02
1101
0.00
03/19/02
M031902
EMPL RECOGNITION
GIF 20
3/19 EVENT
03/19/02
108817
0.00
0.00
100031100000
9241
DEWBERRY, DOC
M
03/19/02
1101
0.00
03/19/02
M031902
3 /19EMPLOYEE RECOGNI 20
3/19 EVENT
03/19/02
108816
0.00
0.00
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
f;
PAGE 1
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
995.00
995.00
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 09:19:11 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
300.00
300.00
1295.00
1295.00
1295.00
1295.00
03/28/02
DISC DATE
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
DISC AMT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
426.00
FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD
INC HOUSE /INC
426.00
0.00
03/19/02
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
290124202001 9102
CHICAGO TITLE COMPAN N
03/19/02
1101
M031902
AMEZCUA- ESCROW CLOSI 20
SPACE 27
03/19/02
108818
290124202001 9102
CHICAGO TITLE COMPAN N
1278.00
03/19/02
1101
M031902
MUNGER- ESCROW CLOSIN 20
SPACE #22
03/19/02
108820
290124202001 9102
CHICAGO TITLE COMPAN N
03/19/02
1101
M031902
HATCHER- ESCROW CLOSI 20
SPACE #17
03/19/02
108821
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK
RELOC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK
RELOC NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
t
PAGE 2
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
03/19/02
426.00
0.00
0.00
426.00
0.00
03/19/02
426.00
0.00
0.00
426.00
0.00
03/19/02
426.00
0.00
0.00
426.00
1278.00
1278.00
1278.00
1278.00
1278.00
1278.00
2573.00
2573.00
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 09:19:11 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2400 -
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
240078000000
9252 DISPENSING TECHNOLOG
N
03/27/02
1101
AP030602 ALL PKS EPDXY&NOZZLE
20
MN19953
03/06/02
108697 V
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE
l >
y
g
t
f
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 02/08/02 -23.51
0.00 0.00 -23.51
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 09:31:21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
-23.51
-23.51
-23.51
-23.51
D3/28/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2501 -
LOS ANGELES
A.O.C.
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
250183108003
9601
BOYLE ENGINEERING
CO N
20010021 -01
03/27/02
1101
AP032002
LA AVE &BELTRAMO WIDE 20
INV #7
03/20/02
108797 V
TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM CHECK AMT
TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM NET PAYABLE
250183108013 9601 BOYLE ENGINEERING CO N
AP032002 LA AVE,SPRING RD WID 20 INV #11
TOTAL LA AVE WIDEN - SPRING /MRPRK CHECK AMT
TOTAL LA AVE WIDEN - SPRING /MRPRK NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
e
k
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 09:31:21
03/27/02 1101
03/20/02 108797 V
PAGE 2
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 02/21/02 - 13871.56
0.00 0.00 - 13871.56
- 13871.56
- 13871.56
0.00 02/21/02 - 2400.00
0.00 0.00 - 2400.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
- 2400.00
- 2400.00
- 16271.56
- 16271.56
- 16295.07
- 16295.07
03/27/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - -- -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT
108822 1101 03/29/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299
108823 1101 03/29/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210
108823 1101 03/29/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210
TOTAL CHECK
108824 1101 03/29/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208
108825 1101 03/29/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207
108826 1101 03/29/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210
108826 1101 03/29/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210
TOTAL CHECK
108827 1101 03/29/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
d
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
CANCER INSURANCE
124.32
F/T REG DEFER COMP
2,110.15
F/T REG DEFER COMP
813.12
2,923.27
UNION DUES
350.75
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
118.00
F/T REG DEFER COMP
1,453.29
F/T REG DEFER COMP
3,471.40
4,924.69
P/T REG DEFER COMP
321.35
8,762.38
8,762.38
RUN DATE 03/27/02 TIME 11:21:06 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/27/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
6
FUND FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 8,762.38
TOTAL REPORT 8,762.38
RUN DATE 03/27/02 TIME 11:21:08 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
10.00
SUNDBERG- FINGERPRINTING
10.00
FINGERPRINTING -3 EMPLOYEE
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
9/01
10.00
CHECK REGISTER
20.00
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
100.00
3 /02FAX SRVC
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108828
PARKS SAFETY GLASSES
1101
03/27/02
1004
A T & T WIRELESS SVCS
9420
108829
147.36
1101
03/27/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
108830
CHECK SLEEVES
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACLU- PRINTS
9236
108830
10.09
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU - PRINTS
9236
108830
02 INTERNET SERVICES
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU - PRINTS
9236
108830
2.97
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU- PRINTS
9236
108830
OMNIBOOK AIRLINE ADAPTER
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU - PRINTS
9236
108830
22.00
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU - PRINTS
9236
108830
4 /02COMM SRV VISION INS
1101
03/27/02
2837
ACCU- PRINTS
9236
TOTAL CHECK
108831
1101
03/27/02
1007
ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC
9420
108831
1101
03/27/02
1007
ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC
9420
TOTAL CHECK
108832
1101
03/27/02
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
108832
1101
03/27/02
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9208
TOTAL CHECK
108833
1101
03/27/02
1012
ACCURATE WELDING
9252
108833
1101
03/27/02
1012
ACCURATE WELDING
9252
TOTAL CHECK
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
108834
1101
03/27/02
1341
LIGHTENING POWDER COMPANY
9205
TOTAL CHECK
108835
1101
03/27/02
1046
BANKCARD SERVICES
9102
108836
1101
03/27/02
1115
CATRAMBONE, JOSEPH F
9001
108837
1101
03/27/02
2493
CHALLY, CRAIG M.
9001
108838
1101
03/27/02
1122
CHEVRON USA, INC
9255
108839
1101
03/27/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
108839
1101
03/27/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
TOTAL CHECK
108840
( d
1101
03/27/02
1144
COMPUWAVE
9201
108841
t`
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
d
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
/ 9k
�d�i
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
RUN
DATE
03/28/02 TIME 14:13:38
PAGE 1
DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
2/02 798 MPK AVE LONG DIS 20.08
SZABO -WEEK ENDED 3/8 -28HR 630.00
MARTIN FINGERPRINTING
10.00
SUNDBERG- FINGERPRINTING
10.00
FINGERPRINTING -3 EMPLOYEE
30.00
RIMBALLPETRE FINGERPRINTI
10.00
CHUDOBA FINGERPRINTING
10.00
FINGERPRINTING -2 EMPLOYEE
20.00
BEHLING FINGERPRINTING
10.00
100.00
3 /02FAX SRVC
7.15
3 /02ANSWERING SRVC
61.00
68.15
AVRC OPERATING SUPPLIES
2.32
PARKS SAFETY GLASSES
13.97
16.29
TREE STAKE ON WALNUT ST
3.86
COM CTR & SR CTR BALLARDS
147.36
151.22
PORELON TABLE TOP OUTFIT
139.95
INK REMOVER TOWELETTES
9.95
CHECK SLEEVES
19.95
SHPG /HNDLG - LIGHTENING P
5.15
LAB COAT WITH SNAP X -LG
4.95
SHPG /HNDLG - LIGHTENING P
10.09
LATENT PRINT TAPE DISPENS
9.95
INDENTICATOR PALM PRINT P
82.95
282.94
02 INTERNET SERVICES
219.50
3 /4COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
3 /4COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
1 /02MPK PD FUEL
2.97
GAURDSHACK BACKFLOW ENCLO
389.11
RELIEF VALVE STEM ASSEMBL
16.89
406.00
OMNIBOOK AIRLINE ADAPTER
188.76
4 /02CROSS GUARD VISION IN
16.10
4 /02PUB TRANS VISION INS
4.49
4 /02REC VISION INS
22.00
4 /02SLD WST VISION INS
9.29
4 /02COMM FAC VISION INS
31.05
4 /02SR CTR VISION INS
15.90
4 /02COMM SRV VISION INS
9.90
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
50.01
4/02C CLERK VISION INS
46.60
4 /02NPDES VISION INS
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
9/01
52.19
CHECK REGISTER
8.00
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
4 /02SLD WST VISION INS
.80
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108841
8.00
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
4 /02AFF HOUSE VISION INS
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
45.86
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
4/02AD842 VISION INS
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
775.50
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
50 XXL ADULT SPORT SHIRTS
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
40.00
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
GASTWIRT14-C RAMOS
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
27.30
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE BR
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
3751
108841
ACCOUNTING
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
108841
1101
03/27/02
1165
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
9010
TOTAL CHECK
108842
1101
03/27/02
3044
CUNNINGHAM, JOHN
2607
108843
1101
03/27/02
1167
D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED
9244
108843
1101
03/27/02
1167
D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED
9244
108843
1101
03/27/02
1167
D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED
9244
TOTAL CHECK
108844
1101
03/27/02
2494
DEGUARDI, JONATHON Q.
9001
108845
1101
03/27/02
3056
DEMO SYSTEMS, LLC.
3865
108846
1101
03/27/02
3049
DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS & M
9102
108847
1101
03/27/02
1212
ENGRAVING WIZARD
9205
108848
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9230
108848
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9231
108848
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9231
108848
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9650
108848
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9241
108848
!
1101
03/27/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9231
TOTAL
CHECK
c�
108849
1101
03/27/02
3048
GREAT ACTIVITIES
9220
108850
((�
4 e
1101
03/27/02
2823
HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT
9610
i3
108851
1101
03/27/02
2324
JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ
9224
108851
1101
03/27/02
2324
JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ
9223
RUN
DATE
03/28/02 TIME 14:13:38
PAGE 2
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
4 /02PRK MAINT VISION INS
50.01
4/02C CLERK VISION INS
46.60
4 /02NPDES VISION INS
.56
4 /02PW VISION INS
10.55
4 /02ADMIN VISION INS
52.19
4 /02TEEN COORD VISION INS
8.00
4 /02CEO VISION INS
24.25
4 /02SLD WST VISION INS
.80
4 /02MRA /ECO VISION INS
43.83
4 /02COBRA VISION INS
39.80
4 /02VECTOR VISION INS
41.40
4 /02HR VISION INS
8.00
4 /02ADMIN VISION INS
20.70
4 /02MRA VISION INS
17.93
4/02ADS42 VISION INS
7.25
4 /02AFF HOUSE VISION INS
1.20
4 /02CDBG VISION INS
2.00
4 /02PLANNING VISION INS
50.25
4 /02FINANCE VISION INS
45.86
4 /02PRKNG ENF VISION INS
15.24
4/02C CLERK VISION INS
66.10
4 /02COMM DEV VISION INS
21.90
4/02AD842 VISION INS
1.19
4 /02PRK MAINT VISION INS
20.70
4 /02ST MAINT VISION INS
70.46
775.50
REFUND -PRKNG CIT #162133
40.00
ADULT SPORTS LEAGUE SHIRT
90.63
175 XL ADULT SPORTS SHIRT
634.38
50 XXL ADULT SPORT SHIRTS
262.76
987.77
3 /4COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
REFUND- FORFEIT FEES
40.00
56 UNITS CERTIFICATE PYMT
172.00
NIELSEN - CLERICAL AIDE II
11.26
WILLIAMS -CJPIA
12.00
GASTWIRT14-C RAMOS
35.75
B MUNIZ -CA PRK & REC -FRET
12.50
WILLIAMS -BOYLE ENGINEERIN
22.00
FRETZ - BUDDY'S ALL STARS
27.30
SCZEPAN- ADVANCED BORING
15.50
125.05
PE FIREWORKS,OUTDOOR GAME
52.69
NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE BR
151.25
CALED MTG MILEAGE
127.02
CALED MTG TRAVEL COSTS
557.20
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 9/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - ---- VENDOR------ -- --- ---
ACCT
- - - - -- -DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
684.22
TOTAL CHECK
1272
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C
9244
3 /1AFTER DARK EVENT TOWER
228.45
108852
1101
03/27/02
2314
HOLGUIN, EDWARD
2607
REFUND -PRKNG CIT #166951
280.00
108853
1101
03/27/02
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02CDBG EMP ASSIST
.63
108854
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02SLD WST EMP ASSIST PR
.25
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4/02AD84 -2ST EMP ASSIST
.17
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02MRA EMP ASSIST PROG
2.12
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02FINANCO EMP ASSIST PR
8.75
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02ADMINCE EMP ASSIST
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02ADMIN EMP ASSIST PROG
6.25
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02ADMIN EMS ASSIST PROG
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02HR EMP ASSIST PRO
2.50
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4/02C CLERK EMP ASSIST PR
6.25
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PRKNG ENF EMP ASSIST
2:73
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02CROSS GUARD EMP ASSIS
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02NPDES EMP ASSIST PROG
,10
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PW EMP ASSIST
1.93
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
ASST
4 /02PUB TRANS EMP ASSIST
1.11
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
EMP ASSIST
4 /02CE
12.08
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02 EMP ASSIST PROGR
8MAINT
4:8
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02COM M DES EMP ASSIST
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02AFF HOUSE EMP ASSIST
37
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PRK MAINT EMP ASSIST
2,50
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PRK MAINT EMP ASSIST
6.64
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4/02AD842 EMP ASSIST PROG
.86
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PLANNING EMP ASSIST
10.50
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02PW EMP ASSIST PROG
2.50
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02REC EMP ASSIST PROG
5.00
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02COMM SRV EMP ASSIST
2.26
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02VECTOR EMP ASSIST PRO
5.00
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02COMM FAC EMP ASSIST
3.76
2.50
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02SR CTR EMP ASSIST PRO
108854
1101
03/27/02
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4 /02SLD WST EMP ASSIST PR
2.62
108854
1101
1282
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
9010
4/02C MGR EMP ASSIST PROG
108854
1101
03/27/02
115.00
TOTAL
CHECK
03/27/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9252
COMP CABINETS RETURN
- 1
108855
1101
1101
03/27/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9303
HARDWARE
SIGN HARDWARE
89.95
148.66
108855
1101
03/27/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9252
COMPUTER ROOM CABINETS
24.49
108855
03/27/02
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9208
PARKS- STAPLE GUN & KNIFE
108855
1101
1283
HOME DEPOT -GECF
9204
RESEEDING PROJECT SUPPLIE
108855
1101
03/27/02
236.09
TOTAL
CHECK
l / 1101
03/27/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
COM FAC CLEANING SUPPLIES
250.87
108856
108856
( 1101
03/27/02
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIES
358.69
TOTAL
CHECK
1101
03/27/02
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102
CITY BUS #33 REPAIRS
42.47 464.61
108857
108857
1101
03/27/02
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102
CITY BUS #32 REPAIR
82,45
1101
03/27/02
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9102
CITY BUS 301 REPAIR
108857
2993
INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER
9102
CITY BUS #31 REPAIRS
348.31
108857
1101
03/27/02
937.84
TOTAL
CHECK
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
RUN DATE 03/28/02
TIME 14:13:38
03/28/02
19.11
AQUATIC CONF MILEAGE
102.20
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 9/01
BEAD NECKLACES
55.70
CHECK REGISTER
15.76
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL
FUND- UNRESTRICTED
212.75
3 /02CITY HALL WATER & EQU
154.50
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108858
1101
03/27/02
1305
J E CLARK II CORPORATION
9255
108859
1101
03/27/02
1316
KELLY PAPER
2 /02MRA /ECO LONG DISTANCE
9202
108860
1101
03/27/02
3046
LEOS, TERESA
.04
2606
108861
1101
03/27/02
1342
LINDLEY, MARY
2 /02PARKS CAR WASHES
9223
108861
1101
03/27/02
1342
LINDLEY, MARY
3.50
9224
3.50
TOTAL
CHECK
2 /02MPK PD CAR WASHES
73.00
156.00
108862
1101
03/27/02
2560
LIQUID LIGHT
71.65
9243
108862
1101
03/27/02
2560
LIQUID LIGHT
1 /02PW STREETS FUEL
9243
108862
1101
03/27/02
2560
LIQUID LIGHT
26.89
9243
108862
1101
03/27/02
2560
LIQUID LIGHT
9243
TOTAL
CHECK
108863
1101
03/27/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER
COMPANY, I
9205
108863
1101
03/27/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER
COMPANY, I
9205
108863
1101
03/27/02
1361
MATILIJA WATER
COMPANY, I
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
108864
1101
03/27/02
1784
MCI WORLDCOM
9420
TOTAL
CHECK
108865
1101
03/27/02
1366
MCMASTER -CARR
SUPPLY
9252
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
108866
1101
03/27/02
1376
MOORPARK AUTO
SPA & LUBE
9254
TOTAL
CHECK
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
108867
1101
\ J
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
` j 1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
( 1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1 1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
RUN DATE 03/28/02
TIME 14:13:38
PAGE 4
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
PARKS ALL FUELS 23.35
CARDSTOCK PAPER FOR POSTC 263.73
REFUND- SECURITY DEPOSIT 100.00
AQUATIC CONF MEALS
19.11
AQUATIC CONF MILEAGE
102.20
121.31
HANDHELD BLACK LIGHTS
8.43
BEAD NECKLACES
55.70
FREIGHT (TEEN EVENT SUPPL
15.76
GLOW NECKLACES
132.86
212.75
3 /02CITY HALL WATER & EQU
154.50
3 /02AVRC WATER & EQUIPMEN
30.85
3 /02PW WATER & EQUIPMENT
16.95
202.30
2 /02CITY COUNCIL LING DIS
31.30
2/02C MGR LONG DISTANCE
5.01
2 /02CITY HALL LONG DISTAN
95.80
2 /02RECREATION LONG DISTA
1.19
2 /02ST MAINT LONG DISTANC
1.03
2 /02MRA /ECO LONG DISTANCE
8.86
2 /02SR CTR LONG DISTANCE
.04
2 /02FINANCE LONG DISTANCE
.16
2 /02COMM SRVC LONG DISTAN
.04
2 /02EMERGENCY MGT LONG DI
.99
144.42
SR CTR PAPER TOWEL HOLDER
44.48
2 /02PARKS CAR WASHES
14.00
2 /02PW STREETS CAR WASHES
31.00
2 /02VECTOR CAR WASHES
7.00
2 /02CROSS GUARD CAR WASHE
3.50
2 /02PRKNG ENF CAR WASHES
3.50
2 /02PW ADMIN CAR WASHES
24.00
2 /02MPK PD CAR WASHES
73.00
156.00
2 /02PRKNG ENF CAR WASH
3.50
2 /02CROSS GUARDS CAR WASH
3.50
1 /02PW CAR WASH,OIL CHANG
71.65
2 /02MPK PD FUEL
78.10
1 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL
5.19
1 /02PARKS FUEL
95.30
1 /02PW STREETS FUEL
13.70
2 /02PW ADMIN FUEL
7.67
2 /02AVRC FUEL
56.75
1 /02VECTOR FUEL
26.89
1 /02MPK PD FUEL
63.84
1 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL
5.19
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
107.90
2 /02PW STREETS CAR WASHES
76.80
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 9/01
19.58
CHECK REGISTER
19.58
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
2 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL
14.39
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9254
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
108867
1101
03/27/02
2537
MOBIL /GECC
9255
3 /20CC MTG AGENDA PACKETS
TOTAL
CHECK
19.31
#10 WINDOW ENVELOPES
166.24
108868
1101
03/27/02
1382
MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE
9103
108869
1101
03/27/02
1718
MOORPARK PRINTERS
9232
108870
1101
03/27/02
1403
MVCAC- SOUTHERN REGION
9222
108871
1101
03/27/02
1392
MVCAC -STATE MOSQUITO ASSO
9222
108872
1101
03/27/02
1417
NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS
9208
108873
1101
03/27/02
1422
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
9204
108874
1101
03/27/02
1423
ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY
9244
108874
1101
03/27/02
1423
ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY
9244
TOTAL
CHECK
108875
1101
03/27/02
1428
PACIFIC BELL
9420
108876
1101
03/27/02
1951
PACIFIC MATERIALS LABORAT
9620
108877
1101
03/27/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9350
108877
1101
03/27/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9352
TOTAL
CHECK
108878
1101
03/27/02
1433
PARADISE PRODUCTS, INC
9243
108878
1101
03/27/02
1433
PARADISE PRODUCTS, INC
9243
TOTAL
CHECK
108879
1101
03/27/02
2073
PEACOCK, STEVE P
9102
108880
1101
03/27/02
1444
PFLAUMER, THOMAS E.
9001
108881
1101
03/27/02
2608
PINNACLE CNG COMPANY
9255
108882
1101
03/27/02
1447
PITNEY BOWES
9211
108883
1101
03/27/02
1916
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
9205
108884
% 1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
108884
f °� 1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9241
108884
�. q 1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
108884
'J 1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
108884
1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9244
108884
1101
03/27/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
TOTAL
CHECK
108885
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
RUN DATE 03/28/02
TIME 14:13:38
PAGE 5
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
2 /02PARKS CAR WASHES
107.90
2 /02PW STREETS CAR WASHES
76.80
2 /02PARKS FUEL
37.40
2 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL
19.58
2 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL
19.58
2 /02PW STREETS FUEL
79.21
2 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL
14.39
786.14
4 /02SR CTR NEWS TYPESETTI
160.87
SPRING 02 FLYER PRINTING
385.03
4 /10TRAN,WESTERLINE SEMIN
120.00
4 /12WEST NILE VIRUS W/S
50.00
BRAKE CLEANER -TOOLS & A/C
34.62
PARKS OPERATING SUPPLIES
64.14
FREIGHT (SPRING CAMP SUPP
9.74
CAMP STORE PRIZES AND SUP
57.46
67.20
3/02 T -1 PHONE LINE
126.88
AVCP RESTROOMS PROJECT
469.25
3 /02STATE ROUTE SWEEPING
284.31
3 /02METROLINK SWEEPING
535.23
819.54
FREIGHT (VOLUNTEER RECOGN
8.49
SR VOLUNTEER DINNER SUPPL
84.88
93.37
2 PRKNG CITATION HEARINGS
30.00
3 /4COMPENSATION MTG
100.00
VECTOR CNG FUEL
14.71
4 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL
64.35
SR CTR VOLUNTEER SUPPLIES
50.40
3 /20CC MTG AGENDA PACKETS
293.44
RECOGNITION EVENT PRINTIN
19.31
#10 WINDOW ENVELOPES
166.24
4 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER PRI
283.14
EGG HUNT PRIZES SHIPPING
21.39
3 /6CC MTG AGENDA PACKETS
679.54
1,463.06
COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL
61.09
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
29.09
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
29.09
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
9/01
29.10
CHECK REGISTER
34.32
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
18.11
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-31.27
- - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108885
363.73
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
108885
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
108885
180.84
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
108885
12 /010EO FUEL
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
108885
352.25
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
108885
REP HOUSING -FINAL PYMT
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
108885
19.73
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
108885
FREIGHT (HEAVY DUTY DRAG
1101
03/27/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
500 WATER BOTTLES FOR SPR
390.38
TOTAL CHECK
1,007.07
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
108886
1101
03/27/02
2955
RAMIREZ, RICARDO
9413
108886
1101
03/27/02
2955
RAMIREZ, RICARDO
2614
TOTAL CHECK
108887
1101
03/27/02
3050
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY
9220
108888
1101
03/27/02
1921
SCANTRON CORPORATION
9232
108888
1101
03/27/02
1921
SCANTRON CORPORATION
9232
TOTAL CHECK
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
108889
1101
03/27/02
1508
SHELL OIL COMPANY
9255
TOTAL CHECK
108890
1101
03/27/02
1527
SMART & FINAL
9205
108891
1101
03/27/02
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO
9252
108892
1101
03/27/02
2037
STEPHANIE A SHAW
9225
108893
1101
03/27/02
3008
STEVE THOMSON / VIRGINIA
9285
108894
1101
03/27/02
1552
STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL
9201
108895
1101
03/27/02
3055
STRINGER, LAURA
9241
108896
1101
03/27/02
1438
SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC
9102
108897
4A
1101
03/27/02
2907
THERESA'S COUNTRY FEED &
9205
108898
c i
1101
03/27/02
1575
THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY
9102
108899
'^
1101
03/27/02
1581
TOMARK SPORTS
9244
108899
{,j
1101
03/27/02
1581
TOMARK SPORTS
9244
•
TOTAL CHECK
r�
�"'
108900
1101
03/27/02
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9244
108900
1101
03/27/02
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9244
TOTAL CHECK
RUN DATE
03/28/02 TIME 14:13:38
PAGE 6
- -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
29.09
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
29.09
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
29.10
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
18.11
268.50
1 /1- 1 /16GAS UTILITY USAGE
-31.27
REFUND SPACE #23 DEPOSIT
395.00
363.73
H RILEY -52 ISSUES
39.95
FREIGHT CHARGE- PAYROLL CK
19.75
PAYROLL CHKS BEG. W /CHK #
308.06
327.81
12 /01VECTOR FUEL
40.28
12 /01AVRC FUEL
2.09
12 /01PW STREETS FUEL
180.84
12 /01CROSS GUARDS FUEL
4.87
12 /01PW ADMIN FUEL
8.25
12 /01LANDS & LIGHT FUEL
5.23
12 /010EO FUEL
21.82
12 /01PARKS FUEL
81.57
12 /01PRKNG ENF FUEL
7.30
352.25
SR CTR HOSPITALITY SUPP
76.90
2/12 -3/14 213 E LA AVENUE
74.35
CALFEST- MEALS &TRAVEL EXP
85.08
REP HOUSING -FINAL PYMT
585.00
COPIER TONER SUPPLIES
319.61
WAYNE LOFTUS RETIREMENT
249.97
02 /02DATA LINE SERVICES
19.73
ANIMAL CONTROL KENNEL
147.99
2 /02TAXI SRVC -15 TRIPS
104.70
HEAVY DUTY DRAG MATS 616"
449.14
FREIGHT (HEAVY DUTY DRAG
20.21
469.35
100 JUNIOR BASKETBALL TRO
616.69
500 WATER BOTTLES FOR SPR
390.38
1,007.07
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 9/01
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 7
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
------ --
- - ---- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
108901
1101
03/27/02
1593
U.S. POSTMASTER
9231
4 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTER POS
300.00
108902
108902
108902
108902
108902
108902
108902
108902
108902
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
UNION 76
9255
9255
9255
9255
9255
9255
9255
9255
9255
12 /01VECTOR FUEL
12 /01PW ADMIN FUEL
12 /01PARKS FUEL FUEL
12 /01AD842 FUEL
12 /O1PW ST FUEL
12/01CR STREETS FUEL
12 /01TROSS GUARDS FUEL
12 /01MPK FIC ENF FUEL
12 /OlMPK PD FUEL
95.64
3.10
100.00
163.63
21.46
273.02
17.40
26.11
22.80
723.16
TOTAL CHECK
108903
108903
108903
1101
1101
1101
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
1599
1599
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9630
9630
9232
AVCP PRELIMINARY PLAN
AVCP UTILITIES
ZONING MAP REPRODUCTIONS
8.04 11.54
12.01 31.59
TOTAL CHECK
108904
108904
108904
108904
108904
108904
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
1152
1152
1152
1152
1152
1152
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE
9102
9102
9102
9102
9102
9102
12/01C CLERK RECORD STORA
1 /02ADMIN RECORD STORAGE
12 /01COM DEV RECORD STORA
12 /01ADMIN RECORD STORAGE
1 /02C CLERK RECORD STORAG
1 /02COM DEV RECORD STORAG
28.02
27.44
40.14
158.74
TOTAL CHECK
108905
1101
03/27/02
1160
VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR
9212
4 /02VECTOR WALNUT LEASE
320.65
108906
1101
03/27/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9236
12 /01EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT
10.00
108907
1101
03/27/02
1621
VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS
9102
3 /3- 3 /6REPAIR LIVE BROADC
563.11
108908
108908
108908
1101
1101
1101
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
1624
1624
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9252
9252
9252
POINDEXTER PRK LIGHT FUSE
SAW BLADES -ALL PARKS
AVRC EXIT SIGN BULBS
23.32 19.90
19.31
62.53
TOTAL
CHECK
108909
1101
03/27/02
1939
WESTERN CHAPTER ISA
9221
WALTER 02 MEMBERSHIP BALA
10.00
108910
108910
108910
108910
108910
108910
108911
108911
108911
1101
1101
1101
1101
1101
` 1101
TOTAL
i
( a 1101
1101
1101
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
CHECK
03/27/02
03/27/02
03/27/02
1636
1636
1636
1636
1636
1636
1643
1643
1643
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9252
9252
9252
9204
9208
9208
9303
9303
9303
AV WALL REPAIR
PARKS TRUCKS IRRIG CAPS
SR CTR & COM CTR MAINTENA
CITY HALL L BRACKETS
PW HARDWARE
PW BATTERIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
NO U TURN,NO LEFT TURN
STREET NAME SIGNS
13.26 5.90
10.84 19.98
7,06
3.74
60.78
472.97
79 79
318.32
871.08
(-rr� TOTAL
CHECK
21,353.25
TOTAL FUND
21,353.25
TOTAL REPORT
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
RUN DATE 03/28/02
TIME 14:13:38
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
1,310.31
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
11,373.89
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
183.78
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
488.83
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
238.06
2201
CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1.57
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
459.05
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
928.72
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
173.25
2605
GAS TAX
2,163.09
2701
CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND
2.63
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
1,156.28
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER
857.46
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
1,583.37
5001
SOLID WASTE AB939
12.96
6000
FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS
420.00
TOTAL REPORT
21,353.25
a
s
/ ?5
PAGE 1
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 14:13:41 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
1,123.98
EXTRON VGA TO UXGA DIST.
579.15
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
10 /01
SHARP CEILING MOUNT FOR P
CHECK REGISTER
SHARP LCD PROJECTOR
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
SONY RACKMOUNT KITS FOR P
291.72
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
108912
1101
04/03/02
3001
A -VIDD ELECTRONICS COMPAN
9504
ACCOUNTING
TOTAL CHECK
108913
1101
04/03/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
108914
1101
04/03/02
3047
ALAN BORNSTEIN CONSTRUCTI
9103
108914
1101
04/03/02
3047
ALAN BORNSTEIN CONSTRUCTI
9103
TOTAL CHECK
108915
1101
04/03/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
108915
1101
04/03/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
108915
1101
04/03/02
1137
COASTAL PIPCO
9252
TOTAL CHECK
108916
1101
04/03/02
1878
COMMAND PERFORMANCE CATER
9241
108917
1101
04/03/02
3060
COVARRUBIAS, MARIO
9285
108918
1101
04/03/02
1167
D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED
9244
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9208
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
.e 1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
t, l 1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
t' 1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
108919
!.j 1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
x.�
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
0 1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
RUN DATE
03/28/02 TIME 15:08:05
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
SONY 9 IN BLACK AND WHITE
1,123.98
EXTRON VGA TO UXGA DIST.
579.15
EXTRON SCAN CONVERTER
3,410.55
SHARP MOTORIZED ZOOM LENS
2,815.31
SHARP CEILING MOUNT FOR P
241.31
SHARP LCD PROJECTOR
7,207.20
SONY RACKMOUNT KITS FOR P
334.62
SONY RACKMOUNT KITS FOR P
291.72
SONY RACKMOUNT KIT FOR PV
145.86
SONY 14 IN COLOR VIDEO MO
2,020.59
ESE 1X4 AUDIO DISTRIBUTIO
250.97
SONY 8 IN COLOR VIDEO MON
1,179.75
EXTRON DIGITAL VIDEO SCAL
1,640.93
21,241.94
SZABO -WEEK END 3/15 -32HRS
720.00
COMM CTR ROOF REPAIRS
9,956.00
COMM CTR ROOF REPAIR
48,295.20
58,251.20
TREE STAKES & TIES -TR PRK
272.66
TREE STAKES & TIES- ZONE10
289.25
TREE STAKES & TIES- PRKWYS
1,219.30
1,781.21
3 /19EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
1,475.76
REP HOUSING FINAL PYMT
1,712.00
SUMMER 02 CAMP MPK T -SHIR
1,802.08
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
26.98
SR CTR PAPER SUPPLY
43.80
COMM SRVCS OFFICE SUPPLIE
8.34
PLANNING OFFICE SUPPLIES
18.34
VECTOR OFFICE SUPPLIES
91.89
SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES
47.72
SR CTR CHAIR & FILE CABIN
363.02
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
85.10
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
10.24
SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES
114.76
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
144.73
CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES
144.73
MPK PD OFFICE SUPPLIES
616.30
MPK PD OFFICE SUPPLIES
675.86
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES
54.80
MPK PD OFFICE SUPPLIES
252.88
C MGR KEYBOARD
320.68
HOUSING /MRA OFFICE SUPPLI
141.63
HR OFFICE SUPPLIES
33.48
C MGR CHAIR
428.84
C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES
76.28
C CLERK OFFICE SUPPLIES
110.66
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPP
80.47
ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES
71.47
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
10 /01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
199.37
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
FINANCE KEYBOARD
320.68
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
144.73
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
196.98
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
117.67
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
.53
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE SUPP
1.01
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
154.90
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
166.09
108919
1101
04/03/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
29.39
TOTAL CHECK
5,294.35
108920
1101
04/03/02
3010
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
9610
SPRING / FLYNN PRELIM TITLE
500.00
108920
1101
04/03/02
3010
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
9610
FLYNN /SPRING PRELIM TITLE
500.00
108920
1101
04/03/02
3010
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
9610
SPRING / FLYNN PRELIM TITLE
500.00
TOTAL CHECK
1,500.00
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02COMM DEV DNTL,LIFE,LT
173.51
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02CEO DNTL,LIFE,LTD
142.42
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02CDBG DNTL,LIFE,LTD
10.52
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4/02AD842 DNTL,LIFE,LTD
8.97
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02MRA DNTL,LIFE,LTD
94.61
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02MRA /ECO DNTL,LIFE,LTD
199.98
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PRKNG ENF DNTL,LIFE,L
98.40
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02CROSS GUARD DNTL,LIFE
55.16
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02ST MAINT DNTL,LIFE,LT
409.66
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PRK MAINT DNTL,LIFE,L
120.10
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PRK MAINT DNTL,LIFE,L
297.09
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02NPDES DNTL,LIFE,LTD
3.42
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02AFF HOUSE DNTL,LIFE,L
6.31
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PLANNING DNTL,LIFE,LT
89.81
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4/02AD842 DNTL,LIFE,LTD
42.04
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02SLD WST DNTL,LIFE,LTD
54.87
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PUB TRANS DNTL,LIFE,L
29.63
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02SLD WST DNTL,LIFE,LTD
4.21
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4/02C MGR DNTL,LIFE,LTD
447.88
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02SR CTR DNTL,LIFE,LTD
120.10
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02COM SRVC DNTL,LIFE,LT
69.97
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02HR DNTL,LIFE,LTD
42.07
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02PW DNTL,LIFE,LTD
69.16
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
3751
4 /02COBRA DNTL,LIFE,LTD
174.94
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4/02C CLERK DNTL,LIFE,LTD
434.35
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02ADMIN DNTL,LIFE,LTD
309.03
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02FINANCE DNTL,LIFE,LTD
-68.16
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02VECTOR DNTL,LIFE,LTD
240.20
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02COMM FAC DNTL,LIFE,LT
180.16
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02ADMIN DNTL,LIFE,LTD
106.44
108921
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02TEEN COOR DNTL,LIFE,L
42.07
108921
f
1101
04/03/02
1684
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE
9010
4 /02REC DNTL,LIFE,LTD
- 1,524.47
TOTAL CHECK
2,484.45
108922
..-
1101
04/03/02
2823
HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT
9610
LOS ANGELES AVENUE /BELTRA
7,675.00
c'�
108923
1101
04/03/02
1269
HDL, COREN & CONE, INC
9102
1ST QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.66
108923
1101
04/03/02
1269
HDL, COREN & CONE, INC
9102
1ST QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.68
108923
1101
04/03/02
1269
HDL, COREN & CONE, INC
9102
1ST QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.66
RUN
DATE
03/28/02 TIME 15:08:05
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 10 /01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
-------
-- -- - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
1,775.00
TOTAL CHECK
108924
1101
04/03/02
1289
HUGG, JOHN A
9160
GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PYM
1,080.17
108925
1101
04/03/02
1303
IZADSEPAS, MINA G
9160
YOGA,CARDIO,FITNESS INSTR
1,412.92
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
SOLDER REEL STAND
16.36
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
EUTECTIC SOLDER 63/37, .0
11.74
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
NETWORK AND PC MAINTENANC
670.30
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
ENHANCEMENT KIT WITH TOOL
380.74
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
SOLDERING IRON WITH ST3 T
33.25
108926
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
.050" DIAMETER X 10' LONG
3.27
1101
04/03/02
2998
JENSEN TOOLS
9208
SOLDERING IRON STAND
27.89
10 8-926
1,143.55
TOTAL
CHECK
108927
1101
04/03/02
3059
JORDAN, IAN
9285
RENTAL ASSISTANCE
14,295.54
108928
1101
04/03/02
3059
JORDAN, IAN
9285
RESIDENT MOVING EXPENSE
1,100.00
108929
1101
04/03/02
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
3 /02AVRC JANITORIAL SRVCS
960.00
108929
1101
04/03/02
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
3 /02SR CTR JANITORIAL SRV
589.00
TOTAL
CHECK
1,549.00
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
1,610.30
108930
108930
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
3,571.13
108930
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
REIMBURSABLES
167.87
108930
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
REIMBURSABLES
75.70
108930
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
5,003.04
108930
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
REIMBURSABLES
200.56
1101
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNE
2,431.52
108930
04/03/02
3015
KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES,
9601
REIMBURSABLES
97.48
108930
1101
13,157.60
TOTAL
CHECK
04/03/02
2251
MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES
9103
MPK MOBILEHOME PRK APPRAI
9,609.00
108931
1101
108932
1101
04/03/02
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
3.X -4.5X TRM UPG
1,200.27
108932
1101
04/03/02
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
DIGISUITE VIDEO BREAKOUT
480.11
108932
1101
04/03/02
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
DIGISUITE AUDIO BREAKOUT
586.80
1101
04/03/02
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
MATROX DIGISUITE LE NTSC
4,262.31
108932
1101
04/03/02
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
MM- PRO -CG -RACK = MOTION M
3,622.16
108932
2906
MOTION MEDIA, LLC
9504
SET -UP, DELIVERY, INSTALL
108932
1101
04/03/02
10,999.84
TOTAL
CHECK
108933
1101
04/03/02
2992
NUNGARAY, RUBEN
9285
REP HOUSING FINAL PYMT
1,545.92
04/03/02
1783
PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALT
9632
VILLA CAMPESINA FOUNTAIN
1,237.03
108934
1101
1101
04/03/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9351
3 /02TIERRA REJADA SWEEPIN
29.70
108935
{ 1101
04/03/02
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9351
3 /02CITY STREETS SWEEPING
6,156.32
108935
6,186.02
TOTAL
CHECK
r 1101
04/03/02
2354
PARKING COMPANY OF AMERIC
9102
2 /02MPK BUS SRVC & MAINTE
12,651.15
108936
04/03/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
B &S FORMS,DOOR HANGERS
707.85
108937.
1101
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
WILSHIRE BUILD ADMIN CHAR
17.06
108938
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
RUN DATE 03/28/02
TIME 15:08:05
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 10/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
------- -
- - - -- -VENDOR-------- -- - - -- ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
CARLSBERG ADMIN CHARGE
41.44
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
FELSENTHAL /5950 CONDOR
260.00
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
FELSENTHAL ADMIN REVENUE
-39.00
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
MPK MARKET ADMIN CHARGE
34.13
108938
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
WILSHIRE BUILD ADMIN REVE
-17.06
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
9103
CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER
130.00
108938
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
MPK MARKET ADMIN REVENUE
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
MPK MARKET PL /ZELMAN
227.50
108938
108938
1101
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
CARLSBERG
276.25
-41.44
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
CARLSBERG ADMIN REVENUE
39.00
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
FELSENTHAL ADMIN CHARGE
113.75
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
WILSHIRE BUILDERS
-39.00
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
SDI ADMIN REVENUE
39.00
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
SDI ADMIN CHARGE
227.50
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
TOLL BROTHERS
-34.13
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
3806
TOLL BROS ADMIN REVENUE
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2734
TOLL BROS ADMIN CHARGE
260.00
108938
1101
04/03/02
2968
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC
2752
SPECIAL DEVICES INC
1,495.00
TOTAL
CHECK
2820
SCE
9413
4 /02PREVIOUSLY NOT BILLED
1,551.79
108939
1101
04/03/02
1501
SECURITY ABOVE
9102
3 /02METROLINK GUARD SERVI
2,066.40
108940
1101
04/03/02
1101
04/03/02
1511
SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC
9102
01 /02PRKS & REC MAINT
2,134.59
108941
04/03/02
1511
SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC
9103
01 /02ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
1,010.00
108941
1101
1511
SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC
9103
01 /02ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
108941
1101
04/03/02
4,054.59
TOTAL
CHECK
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z11COLMER ALYSSAS CT
32.00
1,149.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z5PCH HILL TO TR
49.00
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z6GLENHAVEN W END ING
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z9MPK BUS CTR PLNTR
53.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z2SPRIN CHR BARR,TR
2,468.00
108942
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z4WMSS RCH PRKWYS,PLN
268.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02ZIOMTN MEADOWS COMM
7,824.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z8HOME ACRES BUFFER
315.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z7MPK SQ IND PK,LA AV
420.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z1PECAN,BAMBI,BENWOOD
84.00
108942
1101
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02MILLER PRK
735.00
108942
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02METROLINK STATION
299.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02VIRGINIA COLONY PRK
315.00
108942
1101
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02CAMPUS PRK
803.00
2,520.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02CMPS CYN PRK
1,208.00
108942
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02GRIFFIN PRK
2,520.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02PCH HILL PRK
PRK
1,018.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02GLENWOOD
326.00
108942
:,
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02MONTE VISTA PRK
5,612.
108942
� �'- 1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3/02AV PRK & PED BRIDGE
2,468.00
108942
1101
{
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02MTN MEADOWS PRK
PRK
2,520.00
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02TIERRA REJADA
1,680.00
108942
i 1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02CNTRY TRAIL PRK
5,491.00
108942
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02PRKWYS & MEDIANS
194.00
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02COMM CTR PRK
108942
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02VILLA CAMPESINA PRK
284.00
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
3 /02Z3PEPP PLFUND
108942
1101
NTBAMATION
ACCOUNTING
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 15:08:05
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 10 /01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- -- --- VENDOR-------- -- - - --
ACCT
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9254
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9254
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
108942
1101
04/03/02
1555
SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE
9331
TOTAL CHECK
108943
1101
04/03/02
2988
TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES
9504
108943
1101
04/03/02
2988
TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES
9504
TOTAL CHECK
108944
1101
04/03/02
1604
VALERIO, BENITO
9102
108945
1101
04/03/02
2283
VENCO WESTERN, INC.
9331
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9252
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
108946
1101
04/03/02
1620
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS
9415
TOTAL
CHECK
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
108947
1101
04/03/02
2309
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC
9330
TOTAL
CHECK
108948
1101
04/03/02
3053
ZAMBELLI INTERNATIONALE
9243
108949
1101
04/03/02
1643
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9303
108949
1101
04/03/02
1643
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9303
108949
1101
04/03/02
1643
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9303
108949
1101
04/03/02
1643
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9303
TOTAL
CHECK
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
f
1
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 15:08:05
- - -- DESCRIPTION --
3/02 18 HIGH ST
3/02 661 MPK AVE
3 /02POINDEXTER PRK
3 /02CIVIC /COMM CTR
3/02 798 MPK AVE
ALARMING DIGITAL DOSIMETR
ALARMING DIGITAL DOSIMETR
3 /02MPK PD JANITORIAL SRV
3/02 Z13 LANDSCAPE SRVCS
1 /3- 3 /5METROLINK
1 /10- 3 /12GLENWOOD PRK
1 /3- 3 /5VECTOR
1 /10- 3 /12POINDEXTER PRK
1 /3- 3 /5COMM CTR
1 /10- 3 /12ZONE 7
1 /10- 3 /12ZONE 3
1 /10- 3 /12PRKWYS & MEDIANS
1 /3- 3 /5REDEVELOPMENT
1 /3- 3 /5PUBLIC WORKS
1 /3- 3 /5MPK MOBILEHOME PRK
1 /3- 3 /5VIRGINIA COLONY
1 /3- 3 /5ZONE 9
1 /3- 3 /5PRKWYS & MEDIANS
AVCP TREE TRIMMING
MTN MEADOWS PRK TREE TRIM
PEACH HILL PRK TREE TRIMM
POINDEXTER PRK TREE TRIMM
TR PRK TREE TRIMMING
GLENWOOD PRK TREE TRIMMIN
7 /3 /02FIREWORKS EVENT
SCHOOL SIGNS
ST NAME SIGNS,U- CHANNELS
NO STOPPING, ST NAME SIGN
STREET NAME SIGNS
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
68.00
42.00
735.00
525.00
80.00
42,242.00
41.67
3,695.30
3,736.97
1,100.00
3,778.50
91.31
664.67
42.75
1,223.24
628.88
713.56
65.04
162.64
404.55
65.28
1,553.58
192.29
33.93
133.88
5,975.60
3,000.00
1,000.00
585.00
3,000.00
163.34
1,000.00
8,748.34
4,000.00
683.16
627.20
499.20
1,592.66
3,402.22
264,639.99
264,639.99
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
03/28/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
2,849.61
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
113,232.19
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
153.56
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1,648.83
2201
CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING
6.31
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
9,068.66
2301
AD 84 -2 ZONE 1
84.00
2302
AD 84 -2 ZONE 2
2,468.00
2303
AD 84 -2 ZONE 3
202.04
2304
AD 84 -2 ZONE 4
268.00
2305
AD 84 -2 ZONE 5
1,149.00
2306
AD 84 -2 ZONE 6
49.00
2307
AD 84 -2 ZONE 7
1,133.56
2308
AD 84 -2 ZONE 8
315.00
2309
AD 84 -2 ZONE 9
86.93
2310
AD 84 -2 ZONE 10
8,113.25
2311
AD 84 -2 ZONE 11
32.00
2312
AD 84 -2 ZONE 12
3,778.50
2313
AD 84 -2 ZONE 13
1,237.03
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
38,142.77
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
13,100.00
2502
TIERRA REJADA A.O.C.
7,732.60
2605
GAS TAX
10,072.15
2701
CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND
10.52
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
20,443.28
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
12,496.67
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
15,137.49
5001
SOLID WASTE AB939
59.08
6026
SDI
299.00
6193
CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR
317.69
6302
FELSENTHAL, JERROLD S.
299.00
6375
PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W
130.81
6399
TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI
523.26
TOTAL REPORT
264,639.99
c�
J
RUN DATE 03/28/02 TIME 15:08:08 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
ITEM /I- C .
ACT,;.;� S�c��� aecflmmea�
Moorpark City Counc i ]$y.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst1
DATE: March 26, 2002 (CC meeting of April 3, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No 2002 - Appropriating Funds for
a Stammer Beach Bus Program Providing Public
Transportation From Moorpark To Zuma Beach County Park.
SUMMARY
Last year the City Council approved a Summer Beach Bus program as a
pilot public transportation service. The bus ran two days per week,
Tuesdays and Thursdays, for ten weeks from mid -June to mid - August.
The cost to run the Summer Beach Bus this season is estimated to be
$10,000. Of that amount, $2,000 would be expended this fiscal year.
If approved, the remainder will be budgeted in the transit budget
for the next Fiscal Year. This is a 3.2% increase over last year.
The recommended fare is $1.00 each way. This program would be funded
using TDA (Transportation Development Act) money.
BACKGROUND
The Summer Beach Bus service completed its twice - weekly service
last summer with a total of four hundred seventy -seven riders. It
was the first year a Summer Beach Bus was offered in Moorpark. The
service was well received and staff had many requests from the
community to offer the beach bus service again this coming summer.
Promotional activity such as weekly newspaper ads, flyers at teen
events, broadcast emails, channel 10, and City web were used.
Moorpark Summer Beach Bus experienced a ridership pattern that was
consistent with the way other beach bus services performed in other
communities. While most of the riders were teens, the beach bus
riders also included families and a contingent from the Moorpark
Senior Center.
Moorpark's Summer Beach Bus joins similar services that are offered
CIil gl"A ./!s 1 Ir)i
V' v V v aM
Beach Bus Program
CC Meeting of April 3, 2002
Page 2
by the cities of Los Angeles, Agoura Hills, Calabasas, and western
Ventura County cities. Staff researched the various beach options
by surveying others beach services. It was found that the most
important factors were to provide a bus with sufficient storage and
to travel to a popular beach with more complete amenities: good
sand, well - formed waves, lifeguards, restrooms, telephones, and
food service. From an operational standpoint it is also important
to make sure that beach property can accommodate transit buses.
Staff found that the beach that offers the best combination of
features is Zuma Beach County Park in Malibu. This is the beach
that Agoura Hills and Calabasas travel to as well. Zuma Beach
County Park is approximately 28 miles from Moorpark City Hall.
DISCUSSION
It is proposed that the City exercise its option in the Agreement
with last year's contractor, Durham Transportation, and renew the
Agreement for another year. The bus Durham Transportation provides
has plenty of storage for umbrellas, chairs, coolers, surfboards,
and the host of other accessories people like to take with them to
the beach. Having four pickup points around Moorpark worked very
well last year. The stops made it convenient for the public to
access the beach bus. Summer Beach Bus stops will be Moorpark City
Hall; AVRC; Peach Hill Park; and Griffin Park.
The proposed schedule and route is similar to last year. The Summer
Beach Bus will begin to pick up riders at 9:00 a.m., depart for the
beach by 10:00 a.m., and arrive at Zuma Beach County Park by 11:00
a.m. The return trip would depart from Zuma at 3:00 p.m. and finish
dropping off in Moorpark by 5:00 p.m. Staff recommends that the
summer Beach Bus fare be the same as the regular bus, $1.00 per
single trip each way.
The Agreement awarded last year to Durham Transportation provides
for the City to renew the contract on an annual basis. The daily
rate adjustment factor is the change in the September Consumer
Price Index (CPI) for all items in the Los Angeles Area. The
September Los Angles area CPI rate was 3.20. Adding that amount to
last year's daily rate of $416.00 per day results in a 2002 daily
rate of $429.31, plus a Public Utilities Commission (PUC) tax
estimated to be less than ten dollars. For budget purposes, staff
requests that $500.00 per day be budgeted to allow a contingency
for unanticipated costs. The vendor would only be paid for actual
services provided. One contingency item that could occur would be
Summer Beach Bus Program.doc C v
Beach Bus Program
CC Meeting of April 3, 2002
Page 3
if a request was made for wheelchair service on the Summer Beach
Bus. A second vehicle would have to be dispatched that is
wheelchair accessible to accommodate the request because the Summer
Beach Bus is a public transit service. The primary vehicle used is
a school bus. While a school bus is not wheelchair equipped, it
offers the greatest storage and seating capacity at the most
affordable rate. Last year there were no requests for wheelchair
service.
If the Summer Beach Bus program is approved, staff requests that
the attached resolution in Exhibit "A" be approved. It appropriates
$2,000 to pay for the four trips occurring in the current Fiscal
Year (June 18, 20, 25, & 27). In order to implement the rest of the
Summer Beach Bus service, staff will include $10,000 in the FY
2002 -2003 transit budget. This will pay for the Summer Beach Bus
for the rest of the summer until the program concludes on August
22, 2002. This program would be funded using the carryover from
previous transit allocations of TDA (Transportation Development Act)
funds. The City Council is also asked to authorize the City Manager
to finalize the Agreement renewal with the contractor, Durham
Transportation.
Additionally, staff seeks Council concurrence on plans to initiate
a special bus to the Ventura County Fair in August, and to again
offer a $20 Summer Youth Transit pass for unlimited use on Moorpark
Transit, the Summer Beach Bus, and the new Moorpark County Fair
bus.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE)
Approve Resolution No. 2002- and authorize the City Manager
to finalize and execute a new Agreement with Durham Transportation
to operate the Summer Beach Bus, and to proceed with plans for a
transit service to the Ventura County Fair on a trial basis.
C,r), f).
Summer Beach Bus Program.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2001/2002 PUBLIC TRANSIT BUDGET TO
APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR A SUMMER BEACH BUS.
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted
the Budget for Fiscal Year 2001/2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to increase the City
Transit budget for the current Fiscal Year to support the
Beach Bus Project; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit "A" hereof describes said budget
amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line
items;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A budget amendment as more particularly
described in Exhibit ` %A" attached hereto is hereby
approved.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified
resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
w vv v.�J
Reso 2002- Summer Beach Bus.doc
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FY 2001 -2002 Community Services Department
Transit Programs
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS
TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
ACCOUNT
APPROPRIATION
FUND
NUMBER
REQUEST
Transit
5000.3588
2,000
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS
TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS
ACCOUNT NUMBER
CURRENT
APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATION
REQUEST
REVISED
APPROPRIATION
5000 - 7310 - 7302 -9102
193,100
2,000
195,100
Total
193,100
2,000
195,100
Approved:
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
ITEM 11- D •
of
ACTION—
City of Moorpark
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
John Brand, Senior Management Analyst IV
March 25, 2002 (CC meeting of April 3, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2002- , Authorizing Submittal
of a Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction
Act Grant Application to the California Department of
Conservation Division of Recycling.
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to consider adoption of a resolution
approving the submittal of the City's application to the California
Department of Conservation Division of Recycling for a Beverage
Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act Grant, and to
authorize the City Manager to execute any agreements, contracts, and
requests for payments.
BACKGROUND
The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act
(the bottle bill) was amended in 2000 to provide funding to cities
and counties. The funding source is the California Redemption Value
(CRV) premium that is paid when consumers purchase beverages in
glass bottles, cans, and plastic containers.
The funding is distributed on a per capita basis. Moorpark is
entitled to receive $9,121 for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002, and an
additional $9,121 for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003. The total award will be
$18,242. All of the money does not have to be spent in the Fiscal
Year for which the funds are awarded. A City must complete a funding
request form and adopt an appropriate authorizing resolution to
receive the funds.
Eligible activities for the expenditure of these grant funds are
defined in the law as:
S: --% r,
.. %, .r _, ,
Beverage Container Recycling Block Grant 2002- 2004.doc
CC Meeting of April 3, 2002
Page 2
• Activities that have a primary emphasis on the collection and
recycling of beverage containers at large venues, public areas,
residential communities, or schools;
• Activities that have a primary emphasis on public education
promoting beverage container recycling and /or litter
prevention;
• Activities that have a primary emphasis on beverage container
litter prevention and /or abatement in public places including
community clean -up projects or other related activities
involving the recycling of beverage containers.
These funds may not be used for activities unrelated to beverage
container recycling or litter reduction. It is staff's
recommendation that the City Council adopt the resolution and that
the money be used to support the many beverage container recycling
projects and programs the City participates in. These projects may
include existing City activities and services such as:
Events and activities
• Recycling promotion and collection at City and community events
such as 3rd of July and Country Days.
• Coastal and Inland Waterways Clean Up Day, the third Saturday
in September (September 21, 2002).
Public information efforts
• Citywide Newsletter
• School packet inserts
• Curbside recycling promotional videos for channel 10
• Residential Recycling Rewards program
• Multifamily Housing Recycling Guide
This is the first year of what is expected to be an annual grant
possibility from the State Department of Conservation Division of
Recycling.
Beverage Container Recycling Block Grant 2002- 2004.doc
Beverage Container Recycling Block Grant 2002- 2004.doc
CC Meeting of April 3, 2002
Page 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
Beverage Container Recycling Block Grant 2002- 2004.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A
BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER
REDUCTION ACT GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF RECYCLING, AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY AGREEMENTS,
CONTRACTS, AND REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark recognizes that it is in
the public interest to enact and implement an integrated
waste management plan to address the state's diminishing
landfill space and the potential adverse environmental
impacts from inappropriate use of the landfill; and
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have
enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and
Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and
counties for establishing and maintaining local collection
programs that encourage recycling of beverage containers;
and
WHEREAS, per § 14581 (a)(4)E) of the California
Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the
eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form
by the due date and time to request funds from the
Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The
Moorpark
Form to
Recycling.
authorizes the
the Department
City Council of the City of
submittal of the Funding Request
of Conservation's Division of
SECTION 2. The City Council appoints the City
Manager, or a designee of the City Manager, that is hereby
authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City
of Moorpark all necessary forms hereto for the purpose of
securing payments and to implement and carry out the
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
purposes specified in the §14581 (a) (4)E)of the California
Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act and
provide information regarding this program to the Division
upon request.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified
resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
CiT 01F
CA
ACTION-.
aooa.-
Moorpark City Counc� -�.-
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: March 21, 2002 (CC meeting of April 3, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2002- , Authorizing Submittal
of a Three Year (2002/2005) Used Oil Recycling Block
Grant Application to the California Integrated Waste
Management Board.
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to consider adoption of a resolution
approving the submittal of the City's application to the California
Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) for an Used Oil Recycling
Block grant, and authorize the City Manager to execute any
agreements, contracts, and requests for payments.
BACKGROUND
The City has been receiving Used Oil Recycling Block Grants since
the program began in 1993. The main purpose of this grant program is
to provide funding to local governments to establish used oil
collection programs that encourage recycling or appropriate disposal
of used oil. To be eligible, a local used oil collection program
may include any activity(s) that the City believes will enhance
recycling or the appropriate disposal of used oil within their
jurisdiction.
The main ways used oil is recycled are through the monthly Household
Hazardous Waste (HHW) collection events on the second Friday, second
Saturday, and third Saturday of each month, and at a state - certified
used oil collection centers. A business applies to the CIWMB to
become a certified collection center. The certified centers accept,
at no charge, a maximum of 20 gallons of used lubricating oil from
a person, per day. A certified center must offer a $0.04 per quart
Used Oil Block Grant 2002- 2003.doc
CC Meeting of April 3, 2002
Page 2
recycling incentive to "walk -in" clients, or accept "donations" of
used oil. Reimbursement need not be given for oil changes done by
the certified center. On a quarterly basis, the certified center
invoices the CIWMB for the amount of incentive funding given to the
public to receive reimbursement. The certification program also
includes subsidies from the CIWMB to dispose of contaminated oil -
up to $5,000 in disposal costs for one shipment per year.
Currently, in Moorpark there are no certified used oil collection
centers. It is anticipated that it will be necessary to use a large
portion of the grant to provide storage and testing equipment to a
local automotive business as an incentive to become a certified
center.
Grant funding will be based on a per capita basis. For next year,
the City will be eligible for $14,623. It is the City's discretion
to use the grant funds as deemed appropriate. The funds could be
used to purchase equipment, contaminated oil disposal, overhead
costs, staff time, public information, and promotional items.
Historically the City has used the grants funds for a balanced mix
of all the expense categories. Many public information activities
and promotional item procurements are accomplished regionally by
pooling grant funds with the other jurisdictions in the county. The
grant application must contain an approved resolution from each
City's governing body authorizing submittal of the application and
identify the individual authorized to executive any agreements,
contracts, and requests for payments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2002-
Used Oil Block Grant 2002- 2003.doc v '`` `� J
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING APPLICATION AND RELATED
AGREEMENTS TO THE CIWMB FOR ALL
AVAILABLE HHW AND USED OIL GRANTS FOR
THE CITY OF MOORPARK
WHEREAS, the people of the State of
enacted the California Oil Recycling Enha
related legislation that provides funds
counties for establishing and maintaining
collection programs that encourage
appropriate disposal of used oil; and
California have
ncement Act and
to cities and
local used oil
recycling or
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have
enacted §47000 et seq of the California Public Resources
Code that provides grants to local governments to
establish and implement waste diversion and separation
programs to prevent disposal of hazardous waste, including
household hazardous waste, in solid waste landfills; and
WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management
Board has been delegated the responsibility for the
administration of these programs within the state, setting
up necessary procedures governing application by cities
and counties under these programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark may seek to enter into
an agreement with the State of California for development
of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of
Moorpark authorizes the submittal of grant applications to
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
the California Integrated Waste Management board for all
available grants under the California Oil Recycling
Enhancement Act and all available HHW grants under the
California Integrated Waste Management Act through June
30, 2004.
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or a designee, is
hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of
the City of Moorpark all necessary applications,
contracts, payment requests, agreements and amendments
hereto for the purposes of securing grant funds and to
implement and carry out the purposes specified in the
grant application.
SECTION 3. The City
adoption of
resolution
Resolutions.
the resolution
to be filed
Clerk shall certify to the
and shall cause a certified
in the book of original
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
C N" ^^ ^sue.{..
� V' v \�
ITE,
of
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Director of Community
Development -31�-2T
Prepared by: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager �V
DATE: March 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/3/2002) 6�
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the
Planning Commission to set a Public Hearing and
Provide a Recommendation on a Zoning Code Amendment
Related to Signs for the Promotion of New Businesses
BACKGROUND
At a February 27, 2002 special Council meeting, Council Member
Millhouse suggested that the Planning Commission study existing
Zoning Code regulations related to temporary signage. A
resolution has been prepared for Council consideration that
would direct the Planning Commission to study appropriate
amendments to the Zoning Code and conduct hearings on the
matter.
DISCUSSION
The attached Resolution for Council Consideration will allow the
Planning Commission to consider appropriate amendments to the
Zoning Code to address the issues raised on temporary signage.
Amendments to these specific regulations would not require an
amendment to the General Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution 2002-
ATTACHMENT: A. Resolution 2002-
\ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020403
stf rpt ZOA Signs.doc
V 4 C. %-I v G
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ( #)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO STUDY, SET A PUBLIC HEARING AND
PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
PERTAINING TO REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 17.40 (SIGN
REQUIREMENTS) OF THE ZONING CODE, TO AMEND
REGULATIONS RELATED TO SIGNS, INCLUDING THE
PROMOTION OF NEW BUSINESSES
WHEREAS, Section 17.60.020 of the Municipal Code provides
that the City Council may initiate proceedings to consider
amendments to the Zoning Code by the adoption of a resolution of
intention requesting the Planning Commission to set the matter
for study, public hearing, and recommendation within a
reasonable time.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby authorizes the
initiation of proceedings to consider amendments to revise the
Zoning Code requirements for the purpose of adding, deleting, or
modifying regulations and standards related to signs, including
the promotion of new businesses.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission is hereby directed
to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation to
the City Council pertaining to amendments to the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code for the purpose of considering amending
regulations and standards relating to signs (Chapter 17.40 of
Title 17).
SECTION 3
this resolution
filed in the book
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
and shall cause a certified resolution to be
of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020403 ZOA
Initiation Signs.doc `r�41
V 'I, L v b
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
I'VE 1► - &-
�aowL
ACT:A.
n mb?rKentL
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffen tedt, Acting Director of Community
Development 'may 1
Prepared by: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager
DATE: March 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/3/2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the
Planning Commission to set a Public Hearing and
Provide a Recommendation on a Zoning Code Amendment
Related to Second Dwellings
BACKGROUND
On January 16, 2002, during discussion of a proposed permit for
a second dwelling, the City Council raised concerns about Zoning
Code regulations related to the permitted size of second
dwellings a) on large lots and b) on lots with small existing
single- family dwellings. Direction was given to staff to return
with a resolution to initiate a study of the Zoning Code on this
matter. A resolution has been prepared for Council
consideration that would direct the Planning Commission to study
appropriate amendments to the Zoning Code and conduct hearings
on the matter.
DISCUSSION
The attached Resolution for Council Consideration will allow the
Planning Commission to consider appropriate amendments to the
Zoning Code to address the issues raised on second dwellings.
Amendments to these specific regulations would not require an
amendment to the General Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution 2002-
ATTACHMENT: A. Resolution 2002-
\ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020403
stf rpt 2nd Dwellings.doc ,/(�' li /-% n,g�
l.svv v"
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ( #)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO STUDY, SET A PUBLIC HEARING AND
PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
PERTAINING TO REVISIONS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF
THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE, TO AMEND
REGULATIONS RELATED TO SECOND DWELLINGS
WHEREAS, Section 17.60.020 of the Municipal Code provides
that the City Council may initiate proceedings to consider
amendments to the Zoning Code by the adoption of a resolution of
intention requesting the Planning Commission to set the matter
for study, public hearing, and recommendation within a
reasonable time.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby authorizes the
initiation of proceedings to consider amendments to revise the
Zoning Code second dwelling requirements for the purpose of
adding, deleting, or modifying regulations and standards related
to second dwellings, including permitted size of second
dwellings.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission is hereby directed
to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation to
the City Council pertaining to amendments to the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code for the purpose of considering amending
regulations and standards relating to second dwellings.
SECTION 3.
this resolution
filed in the book
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
and shall cause a certified resolution to be
of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020403 ZOA
Initiation 2nd Dwellings.doc
2002.
C�rNeti ^v e
v' 1 '�
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CTTY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNYA
City Council Meeting
of �nr 1 Ir , aU)a
ACTION: QD'prYiveci i�ni� fea.)MMen)dF.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable City Council
Walter Brown, City Engineer ull_�
March 28, 2002 (CC Meeting of 4/03/02)
Recognition Awards and ISO Rating for the Moorpark
Building and Safety Division
DISCUSSION
Annually the Ventura chapter of the International Conference of
Building Officials (ICBO) presents awards to individuals in the
building and safety field who represent the top of their
profession. This year two members of the Moorpark Building and
Safety staff received the awards. Permit Technician, Leticia
Alcozar, was presented the "Staff Person of the Year for 2001"
award. Senior Building Inspector Ray Young, who holds an ICBO
certification as Chief Building Code Official, received the
"Building Inspector of the Year for 2001" award. We commend
Leticia Alcozar and Ray Young to you as the best in their fields
in Ventura County.
In a second, and related matter, we are pleased to inform you
that the Moorpark Building and Safety Division has received a
Class 2 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule ( BCEGS)
rating from the Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) . ISO is
the organization that has graded the effectiveness of
departments for many years. Their ratings are used by insurers
in determining insurance rates for commercial property owners
and homeowners. The BCEGS program assigns each municipality a
BCEGS grade of 1 (exemplary commitment to building -code
enforcement) to 10. ISO develops advisory rating credits that
apply to ranges of BCEGS classifications (1 -3, 4 -7, 8 -9, 10) .
Honorable City Council
March 28, 2002
Page 2
The BCEGS program evaluates the effectiveness of local building -
codes enforcement to help determine how well homes and
commercial structures in a given community will hold up to
hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters. The rating
weighed the building codes in effect in our community, the
qualifications of our staff and how our community enforces its
building codes, with special emphasis on mitigation of losses
from natural hazards. This is the second consecutive Class 2
rating we have received. Our rating puts Moorpark in the top 2%
of jurisdictions in the United States. With over 6000 rated,
only 81 jurisdictions in the entire United States have received
a rating of two or better. ISO ratings for jurisdictions in
Ventura t,(_)uiiLy alc
ISO Rating Standings - Cities in Ventura County
Camarillo*
2
Fillmore
Not Rated
Moorpark*
2
Ojai
Not Rated
Oxnard
3
Port Hueneme
3
Santa Paula
3
Simi Valley
3
Thousand Oaks
4
Ventura
2
Ventura County
3
*Building and Safety ueparT-merru bt-_z V_L--cJ
Abbott Associates
Charles
The concept of the ISO rating is that municipalities with well -
enforced and up -to -date codes should experience lower insurance
losses and that insurance rates can reflect that. The prospect
of lessening catastrophe- related damage and ultimately lowering
insurance costs provides an incentive for us to enforce building
codes rigorously, especially as they relate to windstorm and
earthquake damage. ISO gives insurers BCEGS classifications;
BCEGS advisory credits, and related underwriting information.
The rating we have received is significant to all residents and
property owners in Moorpark. ISO ratings are used by insurance
underwriters to determine local insurance rates. The rating
achieved by our Building and Safety Division will result in
lower property insurance rates for our citizens.
�.
Honorable City Council
March 28, 2002
Page 3
STAFF RECOrMENDATION
Receive and file.
Attachment: ISO Report
Rating Graph
^ 4�%4 —, -J,
chart
COUNTRYWIDE
Distribution of Communities by BCEGS Class
Number within Classification
1000
1600
1400
1'200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 111
The personal lines classification addresses building code adoption and
enforcement for 1- and 2- family dwellings. The commercial lines classification is
for all other buildings.
http://1' sonittigation .conl/bcegscha /countrv�v.htmI
Commercial Lines
ElPersonal Lines
Page 1 of I
., r , _,r ._• r
2'?8i02
111 NORTH CANAL STREET SUITE 950 CHICAGO, IL 60606 -7270
TEL: (312) 930 -0070 (800) 444 -4554 FAX: (312) 930 -0017
January 22, 2002
Mr. Steve Kueny
City Manager
City of Moo, park
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
RE: Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule
Moorpark, Ventura County, California
Dear Mr. Kueny:
We wish to thank you, Greg Robinson and Ray Young for the cooperation given to our
representative, John Gorman, during our recent survey. We have completed our analysis of the
building codes adopted by your community and the efforts put forth to properly enforce those codes.
The resulting Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification is 2 for 1 and 2 family residential
property and 2 for commercial and industrial property.
The Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an insurer - supported organization with the primary
mission of providing advisory insurance underwriting and rating information to insurers. There is
no requirement that insurers use our advisory material. Insurers may have adopted, or may be in the
process of adopting, an ISO insurance rating program that will provide rating credits to individual
property insurance policies in recognition of community efforts to mitigate property damage due to
natural disasters. These insurers may use the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification
we have recently developed for your community as a basis for the credits used. While individual
insurers may use different credits or different effective dates, the ISO program will apply credits to
new construction within Moorpark that has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy in the year
2001 and forward.
We have attached a copy of our report which provides additional information about our
classification process and how we have graded various aspects of your community's building codes
and their enforcement.
We want to highlight the fact that the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is an
insurance underwriting and information tool; it is not intended to analyze all aspects of a
comprehensive building code enforcement program nor is it for purposes of determining compliance
with any state or local law or for making property/casualty loss prevention and life safety
recommendations.
Mr. Steve Kueny
January 22, 2002
Page 2
If you have any questions about the Classification that was developed, please let us know.
Additionally, if you are planning on any future changes in your building codes or their enforcement,
please advise us as these changes may affect our analysis and your community's grading
classification.
Sincerely,
eodz D
Building Code Department
(800) 930 -1677 Ext. 6208
Enclosure
cc: Greg Robinson, Building Official w /enclosure
18 High Street
Moorpark, CA 93021
�...�vJ
BUILDING CODE EFFECTIVENESS GRADING SCHEDULE
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is to review the available public
building code enforcement agencies and to develop a Building Code Effectiveness Classification for
insurance underwriting information and rating purposes.
The Schedule measures the resources and support available for building code enforcement. It also
evaluates how those resources apply to the mitigation of the natural hazards common to the specific
jurisdiction. These measurements are then developed into a Building Code Effectiveness Classification
number on a relative scale from 1 to 10, with 10 representing less than the minimum recognized protection.
The Schedule is an insurance underwriting information and rating tool. It is not intended to analyze all
aspects of a comprehensive building code enforcement program. It is not for purposes of determining
compliance with any state or local law or regulation, nor is it for making property /casualty loss prevention
or life safety recommendations. It should not be used for purposes other than insurance underwriting
information and rating.
The Building Code Effectiveness Classifications developed through the use of this Schedule are only one
of several elements used to develop insurance rates for individual properties. Other features specifically
relating to individual properties such as construction, occupancy, and exposures have similar importance in
the development of these rates.
The Schedule is divided into 3 sections:
Administration of Codes:
This section evaluates the administrative support available in the jurisdiction for code enforcement. It
looks for adopted building codes and modifications of those codes through ordinance, code enforcers
qualifications, experience and education, zoning provisions, contractor /builder licensing requirements,
public awareness programs, the building department's participation in code development activities and the
administrative policies and procedures.
Plan Review:
This section assesses the plan review function to determine the staffing levels, personnel experience,
performance evaluation schedules, review capabilities, and level of review of construction documents for
compliance with the adopted building code for the jurisdiction being graded.
Field Inspection:
This section evaluates the field inspection function to determine the staffing levels, personnel experience,
performance evaluation schedules, review capabilities, and level of review of building construction for
compliance with the adopted building code for the jurisdiction being graded.
The attached "Classification Details" identify the subject matter, maximum points achievable and the
points obtained in the review of your community. This information is provided to you without
recommendation and is for your use in understanding the details of the measurement of your building code
enforcement activities in relationship to the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule.
Moorpark, CA
SECTION I
ADMINISTRATION OF CODES
This section evaluates the administrative support for code enforcement within the jurisdiction -- the
adopted building codes and the modifications of those codes through ordinance, code enforcers
qualifications, experience and education, zoning provisions, contractor/builder licensing requirements,
public awareness programs, the building department's participation in code development activities, and the
administrative policies and procedures.
The latest edition of the model codes should be adopted and enforced by the jurisdiction. Use of codes
other than the model codes, the National Electric Code, or the CABO 1 & 2 Family. Dwelling Code may
prorate the points available in Item 105.
If the latest edition of the listed codes were adopted within 1 1/2 years of the published date, and the
published date of the listed codes is within 3 years of the date of the grading Column A applies.
If the above does not apply, or the previous edition of the listed codes is adopted, and the published date of
the listed codes is within 5 years of the date of the grading, Column B applies.
If the next previous edition of the listed codes is adopted, and the published date of the listed codes is
within 10 years of the date of the grading Column C applies
If an earlier edition of the listed codes is adopted Column D applies.
CODES
Points Possible
Points Scored
A
C
D
Building
7.75 pts.
3.60 pts
1.70 pts
7.75 pts.
Electrical
0.75 pt
0.30 pt
0.15 pt
0.45 pt.
Mechanical /Gas
0.75 pt
X4Opt
0.30 pt
0.15 pt
0.75 pt.
Plumbing
0.75 pt
0.30 pt
0.15 pt
0.75 pt.
I & 2 Family Dwelling
4.00 pts*
1.60 pts*
0.80 pt*
0.00 pt(s).
* If a building code is adopted and enforced this value will equal 0.00 points.
1/222/2002
v� - .L- —
a
There should be no modifications to the structural design provisions of the adopted codes and referenced
standards that would weaken the intent for construction mitigation of natural hazards as defined in the
model codes and referenced standards. No proration is permitted in this item.
** Maximum allowable points = (points credited in item 105) x 0.1 x 5.0
Amount of expenditures for training equaling at least 2% of the annual operating budget for all building
department related activities.
2 1/22/2002'
Pts Poss.
Scored
3.00 points
_
3.00 point(s)
Each code enforcement person receiving the following amount of training per year:
Pts Poss.
Scored
Administration 12 hours .. ...............................
1.25 points
0.94point(s)
Legal 12 hours ... ...............................
1.25 points
0.94point(s)
Mentoring 12 hours .. ...............................
1.25 points
1.07point(s)
Technical 60 hours .. ...............................
4.25 points
3.08 point(s)
Incentives provided by the jurisdiction for continuing education, outside training, certification and
certification maintenance.
Pts Poss.
Scored
Community paid certification exam fees
0.50 point
0.50 point
Community incentive - outside training /certification
0.50 point
0.50 point
Community paid continuing education
0.50 point
0.50 point
Education of elected officials or governing authorities in building codes and building code enforcement a
minimum of 3 hours per official per year.
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.50 point
0.00 point
2 1/22/2002'
The credit for certification is as follows:
Certification of code enforcement personnel (applicable to the position requirements) through a
comprehensive examination representative of the performance area for which certification is sought.
State or local jurisdiction mandated program for certification.
Pts Poss. Scored
8.00 points 3.93 point(s)
Pts Poss. Scored
1.00 point 1.00 point
State or local jurisdiction mandated program of certification maintenance through continuing education at
least once every 3 years.
Pts Poss. Scored
2.00 points 2.00 point
Program of employee certification in the field they are employed (prior to employment or within one year
of date of hire or advancement).
Pts Poss. Scored
1.00 point 0.64 point
1!22/2002
The following is reviewed:
Licensed Architect or Engineer
4 1/22/2002
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.60 point
0.00 point
Certification as a building official
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.60 point
0.60 point
High School diploma
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.10 point
0.10 point
College degree
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.50 point
0.50 point
Masters degree
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.40 point
0.00 point
Construction related experience
Pts Poss.
Scored
none
0.00 point
less than 2 years
0.10 point
or two to five years
0.20 point
or more than five years
0.60 point
0.20 point
Code enforcement experience
Pts Poss.
Scored
none
0.00 point
less than 2 years
0.10 point
or two to five years
0.20 point
or more than five years
0.60 point
0.60 point
Building official experience
Pts Poss.
Scored
less than 2 years
0.10 point
or two to five years
0.20 point
or more than five years
0.60 point
0.60 point
4 1/22/2002
The selection process for a building official is designed to select the most qualified candidate.
Selection through examination.
Selection through peer review.
The credit for design professionals is as follows:
Pts Poss. Scored
0.25 point 0.25 point
0.25 point 0.00 point
If supervisory plan review staff are graduate or registered architects or engineers.
Pts Poss. Scored
2.00 points 1.82 point(s)
If non- supervisory plan review staff are graduate or registered architects or engineers
Pts Poss. Scored
1.50 points 0.30 point(s)
If supervisory field inspection staff are graduate or registered architects or engineers.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.00 point
Where possible, special (through ordinance or code amendment) zoning provisions that address mitigation
measures for buildings subject to local natural hazards.
1/22/2002
Contractors/builders licensed and bonded to work in the jurisdiction being graded. The licensure
dependence upon examination and experience.
Licensing requirement for contractors and builders
Pts Poss. Scored
0.10 point 0.10 point
Licensing by examination
Licensing by experience
Bonding requirements for contractors
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
Pts Poss. Scored
0.30 point 0.30 point
Pts Poss. Scored
0.10 point 0.10 point
Reporting of licensing violations in contract documents to the appropriate state professional licensing
board.
The amount of expenditures for public awareness programs equaling a minimum of 0.5% of the annual
operating budget for all building department related activities.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.00 point 1.00 point
The amount of hours spent by code enforcers on public awareness programs, equaling a minimum of 3
hours per code enforcement employee per year.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.00 point
I
0.83 point
1/22/2002
The building department involvement in code development activities and associations with groups or
organizations that assemble building enforcement personnel for the purpose of education and advancement
of effective building codes.
Participation in code change activities
Pts Poss. Scored
0.25 point 0.25 point
Participates in code association/chapter meetings
Pts Poss. Scored
0.25 point 0.25 point
The credit for "Policies and Procedures" is as follows:
A formal appeal process that a contractor/builder or architect/design professional can utilize as recourse to
a building official's interpretation of the adopted building code /zoning regulations.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.30 point 0.00 point
A policies and procedures guide for employees.
Pts Poss.
0.10 point
Scored
0.10 point
The policies and procedures guide covers technical code requirements (such as approved products listings)
that would assist a designer or builder.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.05 point 0.05 point
Publicizing the policies and procedures guide as available to the public.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.05 point 0.05 point
7
1/22/12002
IR
SECTION I1
PLAN REVIEW
This section evaluates the plan review function to determine the following:
Staffing levels
Personnel experience
Performance evaluation schedules
Review capabilities, and level of review of construction documents for compliance with the adopted
building code for the jurisdiction being graded
Staffing levels sufficient to assure comprehensive reviews of construction documents for compliance with
the adopted building codes.
** Maximum allowable points = points achieved in item 215 x item 205
points possible in item 215
5 years or greater experience in plan review of plan review staff.
The credit for the comprehensiveness of plan review is as follows:
Plan reviews conducted on all proposed 1 &2 family dwelling construction or dwelling
additions /modifications.
Note: When plan reviews are not being conducted, the community classification will be a Class 99 for
and 2 family dwellings and the " Pts Scored" will default to the maximum possible in order to determine
the community classification for commercial /industrial property.
Pts Poss. Scored
5.00 points 5.00 point(s)
Comprehensive review of plans performed even if they were prepared and sealed by a registered design
professional certified in the appropriate field of work.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.50 points 1.50 point(s)
1/22/2002
E' r, rp .�
Structural plan reviews conducted for all proposed building construction or building
additions /modifications including a review of engineering calculations.
Pts Poss. Scored
2.00 points 2.00 point(s)
A means to evaluate, or reference evaluation service reports, for substitute products and /or materials for
conformance with the intent of the structural portions of the adopted building codes.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.00 point 1.00 point
A detailed checklist used with each plan review to assure all pertinent building code issues have been
considered.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.50 points 1.50 point(s)
The checklist becomes a part of the permanent record of the project address.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
Credit for quality assurance programs for plan reviewers is as follows:
Annual employee performance evaluations.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
"Follow -up" plan reviews by a different plan reviewer conducted semiannually_
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
1/22,2002
�,' _., — J
SECTION III
FIELD INSPECTION
This section evaluates the field inspection function to determine the following:
Staffing levels
Personnel experience
Performance evaluation schedules
Review capabilities and level of review of building construction
Staffing levels sufficient to assure comprehensive reviews of building construction for compliance with the
adopted building codes.
5 years or greater experience in field inspection.
Pts Poss.
1.50 points
2 years or greater of construction related experience.
Pts Poss.
1.50 points
Scored
0.98 point(s)
Scored
1.50 point(s)
Building department authority to issue correction notices and stop work orders for non- compliant
construction.
A detailed checklist completed for each building construction project to assure that all pertinent building
code issues have been considered.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.50 points 1.50 point(s)
10
1,'22/2002
The checklist becomes a part of the permanent record of the project address.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
Where necessary to assure structural integrity, the building department requirement for special inspections
for specific structural elements conducted by professional inspectors who have been certified for such
work.
When there are construction mitigation measures defined in the adopted building code for the natural
hazard(s) peculiar to the area being graded, special inspections that focus on compliance with the
provisions of the code.
Final inspections performed on all buildings after the construction is completed and the building is ready
for occupancy.
Final inspections performed for I & 2 family dwellings.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.25 points 1.25 point(s)
Final inspections performed for all other buildings.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.25 points 1.25 point(s)
11/22/2002
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.75 point
0.75 point
The certification being obtained by a combination of:
Examination
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.25 point
0.25 point
Experience in the field of inspection they will be performing
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.25 point
0.25 point
An interview by the building official to assess qualifications
Pts Poss.
Scored
0.25 point
0.00 point
When there are construction mitigation measures defined in the adopted building code for the natural
hazard(s) peculiar to the area being graded, special inspections that focus on compliance with the
provisions of the code.
Final inspections performed on all buildings after the construction is completed and the building is ready
for occupancy.
Final inspections performed for I & 2 family dwellings.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.25 points 1.25 point(s)
Final inspections performed for all other buildings.
Pts Poss. Scored
1.25 points 1.25 point(s)
11/22/2002
Certificates of occupancy issued by the building department after the construction is completed and prior to
the building being occupied.
Certificates of occupancy issued for 1 & 2 family dwellings.
Certificates of occupancy issued for all other buildings.
Pts POSS. Scored
1.20 points 1.20 point(s)
Pts Poss. Scored
0.80 point 0.80 point
Credit for quality assurance programs for field inspectors is as follows:
Annual employee performance evaluations.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
"Follow -up" field inspections by a different field inspector conducted semiannually.
Pts Poss. Scored
0.50 point 0.50 point
12
1/221/2002
F::j- urisdiction: Moorpark Total points: 85.28 tate: CA Classification:
1 & 2 Family Dwellings - 2
All Other Construction - 2
Survey Date: Nov. 15, 2001
FINAL SCORING
Section 1 42.65
Section 2 22.93
Section 3 22.04
Subtotal 87.62
Item 105 9.70
The final score is determined by a relationship between Item 105 and the
balance of the scoring.
Points achieved in Item 105
[ {(Section I + Section II + Section 111) - Item 105} x Points possible in Item 105 1] + Item 105
[ {( 42.65 + 22.93 + 22.04) - 9.70} x (9.70 / 10.001 + 9.70 = 85.28
Classification Point Spreads Classification Point Spreads
1 93.00 - 100.00 6 51.00 - 60.99
2 85.00 - 92.99 7 39.00 - 50.99
3 77.00 - 84.99 8 25.00 - 38.99
4 69.00 - 76.99 9 10.00 - 24.99
5 61.00 - 68.99 ]0 0.00- 9.99
13 1/22/2002
Memo
To: Joan Fretz, Human Resources Assistant
From: Dallin Hutchinson, Crossing Guard Supervisor.:
CC: Mike Mathews, Sr. Management Analyst
Date: 08/23/02
Re: Home Address Confidentiality
The California Vehicle Code provides public officers the option of requesting a confidential home
address. CVC section 1808.4 says, in part:
1808.4. (a) The home address of any of the following persons, that appears in any record of the
department, is confidential, if the person requests the confidentiality of that information:
(19) Any active or retired city enforcement officer engaged in the enforcement of the Vehicle
Code or municipal parking ordinances.
The home address can then only be released to a court, law enforcement agency, State Board of
Equalization, or any governmental agency requiring the City to release this information by law. The
Department of Motor Vehicles will substitute my work address in place of my home address in their
records.
This memo will serve as my request to keep my home address confidential.
• Page 1
Message
Debbie Traffenstedt
From: Mary Lindley
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Debbie Traffenstedt
Subject: RE: Claim Submitted By Moustafa Elgamiel
There is a fence the length of the soccer field for that very reason.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Debbie Traffenstedt
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Mary Lindley
Cc: Steve Kueny
Subject: Claim Submitted By Moustafa Elgamiel
Mary,
Page 1 of 1
Please review the copy of the claim form you received that was submitted by Mr. Elgamiel as a result of a
soccer ball that hit his car as he was driving along Collins Drive adjacent to the City's park. Our claims
adjuster has recommended that we reject the claim. John Hartnett confirmed that there were no park
reservations for field use on the date of the incident (8/8/02). If there was a league making use of the
field on that day, it was not a formal, scheduled game. For these reasons, the Council has been
requested to reject the claim at the 10/2/02 meeting. However, you may want to look at whether or
not a fence is needed to minimize balls hitting cars in the future.
Debbie
9/30/2002
Message
Debbie Traffenstedt
To: Mary Lindley
Cc: Steve Kueny
Subject: Need Documentation for Roger Dixon Claim
Page 1 of 1
A claim was filed on 9/26/02 by Roger Dixon pertaining to cement and rocks that hit his vehicle on 9/18/02 from a
trailer being pulled by what Mr. Dixon thought was a City truck. Please review your copy of the claim form and
provide a written response regarding whether any Community Services employees could have been involved in
the incident. You verbally told me that they were at lunch at the time of the incident. Please provide this
information in writing and verify whether there was any time on the morning of 9/18/02 that a Community Services
truck might have been pulling a trailer that was hauling cement and /or rocks.
Thanks.
Debbie
9/27/2002
MEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TO: Debbie Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: September 30, 2002
SUBJECT: Dixon Claim
I do not believe the incident reported by Mr. Dixon involved any Community
Services employee. On September 18, 2002, no employee in the Community
Services department was either pulling a trailer or performing any concrete work.
John Casillas and Rodrigo Ceja spent most of the morning working a Mountain
Meadows Park. They left the Park in one vehicle and headed back to the
maintenance yard at about 11:40 a.m. by way of Tierra Rejada Road, Gabbert
Road and Poindexter Road — they did not use Spring Street or L. A. Avenue at
that time. Once they got back to the yard, they both took lunch at around 11:50
a.m. using John Casillas' personal vehicle. At no time during the date of
September 18 did either John or Rodrigo pull a trailer or work with concrete.
Todd Henderson was on vacation that day.
Neither Mark Westerline nor Loc Trans pulled a trailer on the date of September
30, 2002. They rarely, if ever, pull a trailer (although they have one), but they
never work with concrete.
No one at AVRC pulls a trailer and they never perform concrete work.
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021
-555}� FORM #1 (FRON-T)
FILE WITH: CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
(Address] TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Claims for death. injury to person or to personal property must be riled not later than six
months after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sea 911.2.)
2. Claims for damages to real property must be riled not later than 1 year alter the occurrence_
(Gov. Code See. 911.2.)
3 Read entire claim forth before firing.
4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place at accident
5 This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom.
6. Attach separate sheets. if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET.
TO: (Name of city)
Name of
Home Addrests of Ctaimant ��/— �'� -- --
�3l- urry� a' state
Business Address of Claimant
(tSVS) Z) I r-Dew
RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP
CLAr e
Date of Birth of Claimant
0;? - /I - 4!e
Occu atic o� �F t ^
G v LJ
Home Telephone Number
7
Business Telephone Number
Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent t ia/tm7anz s aoua, ziw-w �r
regarding thisclaim: Ir /nA, / LO, �j,r 6;,� %0 —6�
When di 0 Ear INJURY ateuR is Names of any city employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE
Date ' D Time •r CVe, iZti dAl
It claim is for Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant served
with the complaint:
uate
Where did DAMAGE or INJURY o= r? Describe fully. and locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet. where a
and dress_ and measu0 ` ^ , ` e. i E a �Q (C/�[C.W
Oescnbe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred.
Goa cA.Fil -re &`10 V-604 • t�"v+S CtR-�i T�+Qe t taF2
3 �r� -1�- -� ►-� � c',� l,J tw-v:s CA;-tit 'Dv-1, j 4iA � w E-
Why do you claim the city is responsible? &-k-uc"
N.
Describe in 1ai1 each INJURY or DAMAGE
re . (RpC,< Ca -Ae- -W PA) GJ //JDs
2• t�r►� z£
PAZ �5Po.9/ is -AZlG�
DZ-. ( / yt0/ 4TE LIVIK f)
SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
FORM #1 (BACK)
The amount claimed, as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows
Damages incurred to date (exact):
is irrat�ective damages as far as known:
Oamage' to property ................. .......
S
Future expenses for medical and hospital care ....
5
Expenses for medical and hospital care ......
_ . S
Future loss of earnings .......................
$
Loss of earnings ............................
S
Other prospective special damages ............
5
Special damages for ........................
S
Prospective general damages ................
Total e'st�imra�te estimate damages .........
S
S l
General damages .................. .........
S
CA 6-L1 sr �>(-
Total damages incurred to date ..............
S
M ftf k 4%'1 0 �1,r, 7v
Total amount claimed as of date of presentation
at this claim:
S
Was damage and/or injury investigated by poll a? D If so, what city?
Were paramedics or ambulant La called? If so, name city or ambplance
If injured. state date, time, name and address of doctor of your first visit
WITNESSEI to DAMAGE or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information:
Name Address
Name Address
Name address
Phone
Phone
DOCTORS and OSPITALS:
Hospital_ 71,1 Address Date Hospitalized
Doctor Address Data of Treatment
Doctor �_ Address Date of Treatment
READ CAREFULLY
For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle: location of City vehicle
,ncluding North. East, South, and West: indicate place of accident by at time of accident by "Art" and location of yourself or your vehicle at
X and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. the time of the accident by 84" and the point of impact by 'X'
It City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City NOTE: It diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper
Vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself diagram signed by Claimant.
L6
CURB
9�
2 �
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
C, ,., ,.
P4 CA4
Signature of Claimant or erson filing on
b�re
tis behalf awtrtlation to Claimant:
NOTE:
CURB
Date:
CITY CLERK (Gov. Code Sea 9iSa). Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code Sec. 72.)
i —[