HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2002 0619 CC REGResolution No. 2002 -1982
Ordinance No. 282
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19, 2002
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. INVOCATION:
Pastor Tony Amatangelo, Life Spring Community Church.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
4. ROLL CALL:
S. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Introduction of New Employee, Scott Wolfe, Principal
Planner.
B. Proclamation Proclaiming July 2002 as "Stay and Play
in Ventura County."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of
the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item.
Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards
must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the
Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items
prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion
of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the
beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon
each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of
three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written
Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings
and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the
agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public
review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at
517 -6223.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 2
S. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: (continued)
C. City Manager's Monthly Report.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY)
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be
withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.)
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Establishing a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the
Downtown Area (C -OT Zone) . Staff Recommendation: 1)
Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the establishment
of a Parking In -Lieu Fee as described in the staff
report; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , establishing
a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Commercial Old -Town
Zone; 3) Direct staff to schedule a subsequent Public
Hearing for considering establishment of a Parking In-
Lieu Fee for other commercial zoned properties (may
include C -O, C -1, and CPD Zones) within the Downtown
Specific Plan Overlay Zone; and 4) Direct the Planning
Commission to study amendment of the definition of
"Downtown Area" in Chapter 17.40, Sign Requirements,
as part of the sign code amendments already initiated.
B. Consider Resolution Approving the Final Assessment
Engineer's Report for the Park and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District and
Confirming the Levy for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Open the Public Hearing, receive
testimony, and close the Public Hearing; 2) Approve
the Engineer's Report; and 3) Adopt Resolution No.
2002- , confirming the assessment for the Parks and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District for
Fiscal Year 2002/03.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 3
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued)
C. Consider Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance No. 244 that
Established Development Standards and Zones for the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan 8/
Specific Plan 93 -1) . Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the
Public Hearing, accept testimony, and close the Public
Hearing; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. for first
reading.
D. Consider First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the
City of Moorpark Library Facilities Fee and
Establishing a Public Hearing Date. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Introduce for first reading
Ordinance No. amending the Moorpark Municipal
Code Section 3.36.200 (Library Facilities Fee -
Definitions) to amend the definition of "Library
Facilities "; and 2) Direct staff to provide the
required notices, and to advertise a Public Hearing on
July 17, 2002, to receive testimony and conduct a
second reading for adoption of Ordinance No.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider City Co- Sponsorship of the Moorpark Rotary
Club's Civil War Reenactment. (Continued from City
Council Meeting of June 5, 2002.) Staff
Recommendation: 1) Decline co- sponsorship; and 2)
Authorize staff to implement Options 1 and 2 in the
agenda report.
B. Consider Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and
Objectives for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. (Continued from
City Council Meeting of June 5, 2002.) Staff
Recommendation: Approve Mission Statement, Priorities,
Goals and Objectives.
C. Consider Recommendation of Ad -Hoc Committee on Open
Space, Conservation, and Recreation (OSCAR) Element of
the General Plan. Staff Recommendation: Accept the
OSCAR Element Ad -Hoc Committee recommendation to delay
consideration of the Element until after a decision is
made on the North Park Village project by the voters
of Moorpark.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 4
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of
September 19, 2001.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May
15, 2002.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May
22, 2002.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year
2001 -2002 - June 19, 2002.
Manual Warrants 109618 - 109623 & $ 26,906.37
109632 - 109635 $170,313.11
Voided Warrants
109529 &
109647
$
( 227.84)
Payroll Liability
109624 -
109631
$
12,078.90
Warrants
Regular Warrants
109636 -
109707 &
$
18,971.87
109708 -
109728
$344,891.44
Staff Recommendation: Approve
the warrant
register.
C. Consider an Agreement between the City of Moorpark and
the County of Ventura and an Agreement between the
City of Moorpark and AirPhotoUSA, Pertaining to the
Acquisition and Use of Aerial Imagery. Staff
Recommendation: Approve the Agreements, subject to
final language approval by the City Manager and City
Attorney, and authorize the City Manager to execute
same.
D. Consider Amendment to Agreement No 96 -07 Pertaining
to the Placement and Maintenance of a Temporary
Traffic Signal at the Intersection of (Old) Moorpark
Road and Tierra Rejada Road. Staff Recommendation:
Approve the subject Amendment to Agreement, subject to
final language approved by the City Manager and City
Attorney, and authorize the Mayor to execute same.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 5
11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
E. Consider Approval of an Addendum to the Ventura
Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) - East
Cooperative Agreement, Extending the Agreement with an
Annual Cost Allocation, and Consider Resolution No.
2002 - Amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Transit
Budget. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the Addendum
to the VISTA -East Cooperative Agreement for FY
2002/2003, subject to final language approval by the
City Manager, and authorize the Mayor to sign the
Agreement; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- ,
amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Transit Budget to
reflect the City's share of the VISTA -East service.
(ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
F. Consider Request by Roam'N Relics Car Club to Hold Car
Show on October 27, 2002, from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on
High Street and to Reduce City Fees for the Event.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Waive fee for use of
Redevelopment Agency property, charge Club the
contract billing rate for police charged by the
County, and charge Club the direct cost of other staff
to plan the event; 2) Require Club to pay an
encroachment permit fee ($100) and a temporary special
use permit fee ($88); and 3) Require Club to provide
the City and Agency with an indemnification agreement
and name the City and Agency as additional insured on
the Club's insurance policy.
G. Consider Parks and Recreation Commission Vacancy.
Staff Recommendation: Direct that the Parks and
Recreation Commission vacancy remain unfilled through
the end of the current term.
H. Consider a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of the
Holding of the General Municipal Election to be Held
on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the Election of
Certain Officers of the City and Requesting the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Ventura to Consolidate
said Municipal Election with the Statewide General
Election on said Date, and a Resolution Requesting
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura to
Permit the County Clerk to Render Services to the City
of Moorpark for the General Municipal Election and to
Canvass the Returns of the General Municipal Election.
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 6
11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -
and Resolution No. 2002-
I. Approval to Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal
Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing to Consider Bond
Issue for 190 -Unit Senior Housing Project by USA
Properties Fund, Inc. (Parcel Map 5316). Staff
Recommendation: Set Tax Equity and Fiscal
Responsibility Act (TEFRA) hearing for July 17, 2002,
and direct staff to take necessary actions to initiate
this hearing.
J. Consider Solid Waste Franchise Extension. Staff
Recommendation: Approve and authorize staff to process
an extension of the City's Franchise Agreements with
Moorpark Rubbish Disposal and GI Industries, until
September 30, 2002.
K. Consider Rejection of Claims: Constantino Noval and
Peach Hill Soils, Inc. Staff Recommendation: Reject
the claims and direct staff to send a standard
rejection letter to the claimants.
12. ORDINANCES:
13. CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to
Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government
Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO21825)
City Council Agenda
June 19, 2002
Page 7
13. CLOSED SESSION: (continued)
D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City
of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark
(Case No. SCO22256)
E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited
Partnership and Messenger Investment Company, Inc., a
California Corporation vs. The City of Moorpark and
City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No.
SCO23388)
F. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City
Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative
Services, Director of Community Development, Director
of Community Services, and Director of Public Works.
G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Employee Organization: Service Employees International
Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998
H. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Unrepresented employees: Assistant City Manager,
Director of Administrative Services, ATCM /City Clerk,
Director of Community Development, Director of
Community Services, Director of Public Works,
Accountant I, Budget and Finance Manager, Information
Systems Supervisor, Planning Manager, Principal
Planner, Recreation Superintendent, and Senior
Management Analyst.
14. ADJOURNMENT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's
Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility
to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II).
ISM 9.A.
'�,FI ?. '�? � " =,6)i?y'��d?• ('S,Ffg sip �.?T1
f
of
AC ;
MOORPARK CITY.COUNCIT - - - --
AGENDA REPORT BY`
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manager
DATE: June 13, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/19/02)
SUBJECT: Establish a Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown Area
(C -OT Zone)
BACKGROUND
The City Code requires that parking spaces for new uses and for
enlargements of existing uses be provided in certain quantities
outlined in Chapter 17.32. Also included in Section 17.32.025
of Chapter 17.32 permits a reduction to these quantities by one -
half in the Downtown Area. Section 17.32.025 further states,
"Of the parking required by this section, the applicant may
choose to pay an in -lieu fee in order to reduce any portion of
the parking spaces otherwise required to be provided on -site.
The fee shall be established by city council resolution and
shall be used to offset a portion of the cost required to
construct public parking facilities in the downtown area." State
law requires the City to conduct a public hearing before
establishing the fee.
DISCUSSION
The current architectural standard for the cost of a fully
improved parking space is $8 /sq.ft., including landscaping and
lighting. A single space requires 250 sq.ft., including aisle
area for on -site circulation, which calculates to $2,000 per
parking space. The additional cost of the land of $4 /sq.ft. for
the 250 sq.ft. parking space calculates to $1,000 per parking
space, for a total of $12 /sq.ft. or $3,000 per parking space.
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002 Meeting
Page 2
The land cost is based on the approximate square foot cost that
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency paid in the early 1990's to
purchase the property, located on the south side of High Street
extending east and west of Moorpark Avenue, from the Southern
California Regional Rail Authority. It is assumed that the
parking to be constructed would be on this Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency -owned property. When compared to the
current market value of undeveloped commercial property in the
High Street area at $12 - 15.00 /sq. ft., the $4.00 /sq. ft. fee
for land cost is reasonable.
The above figures and calculations will need to be periodically
adjusted to accurately reflect the true costs of construction of
public parking facilities for the Downtown Area.
This fee falls under the regulation of Government Code sections
66000- 66025. Accordingly, the fee can only be established after
meeting certain disclosure and timeline requirements. The
attached "Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for Downtown Area
Information Sheet" provides the information required for
disclosure by the Government Code. This information must be
provided to the public at least 10 days in advance of the
meeting in which the fee will be considered. Additionally, the
establishment of this fee can only occur after a public hearing
is held and the fee will be effective no sooner than 60 days
after adoption of the resolution. The proposed fee was noticed
in accordance with Government Code requirements.
In researching what definition of "Downtown Area" would be used
for the purpose of calculating the proposed in -lieu parking fee,
staff found that the reference in Section 17.32.025 was to the
definition of "Downtown Area" in the Sign Code (Section
17.40.020). That definition and related map are inconsistent
with the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone (Chapter 17.72).
The City Council has already directed the Planning Commission to
study amendments to the Sign Code, and staff is recommending a
revision to the "Downtown Area" definition in the Sign Code to
conform to the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone. Section
17.32.025 also requires amendment to narrow the definition for
the properties to be provided with a 50 percent reduction in
parking and opportunity for payment of an in -lieu fee to further
reduce on -site parking area. Staff will schedule a future
agenda item for consideration of initiating Planning Commission
study of this correction as well as other editorial corrections
to the Zoning Code.
For the purposes of the current parking in -lieu fee proposal,
staff is recommending using the Old Town Commercial (C -OT) Zone
as the area for which the fee would be in place. As shown on
the attached exhibit from the Downtown Specific Plan, the C -OT
Zone includes all of the properties along High Street, but does
not extend south of Poindexter Avenue and First Street along
Moorpark Avenue. Staff will notice separately and schedule a
subsequent public hearing for other commercial zoned properties
(may include C -O, C -1 and CPD Zones) within the Downtown
Specific Plan Overlay Zone. The value for the land will be
based on recent appraisals, and the parking in -lieu fee for that
area is expected to be higher than that proposed for the C -OT
Zone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Conduct a public hearing to consider the establishment of a
Parking In -Lieu Fee as described in the staff report.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- establishing a Parking In-
Lieu Fee for the Commercial Old -Town Zone.
3. Direct staff to schedule a subsequent public hearing for
considering establishment of a Parking In -Lieu Fee for other
commercial zoned properties (may include C -O, C -1, and CPD
Zones) within the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone.
4. Direct the Planning Commission to study amendment of the
definition of "Downtown Area" in Chapter 17.40, Sign
Requirements, as part of the sign code amendments already
initiated.
Attachments: #1 - Draft Resolution
#2 - Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for the
Downtown Area Information Sheet
#3 - Downtown Specific Plan Zoning Map
#4 - March 27, 2002 Report on Parking Improvement
Financing
,e *.. a^ f 1 s-Z
d , a.
ATTACHMENT 1
i
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
PARKING IN -LIEU FEE FOR THE OLD TOWN
COMMERCIAL (C -OT) ZONE
WHEREAS, the City Council requires that adequate parking
spaces for new uses and for enlargement of existing uses be
provided, and those requirements are outlined in Chapter 17.32
of the Moorpark Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also made provisions in Section
17.32.025 of Chapter 17.32 for a Parking In -Lieu Fee that an
applicant in the Downtown Area may choose to pay, in order to
reduce any portion of the parking spaces otherwise required to
be provided on site; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the funds for
the Parking In -Lieu Fee shall be used for offsetting a portion
of the cost required to construct public parking facilities in
the Downtown Area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further made provisions in
Section 17.32.025 that the Parking In -Lieu Fee shall be
established by City Council Resolution; and
WHEREAS, staff has completed an analysis of the cost to
construct public parking facilities in the C -OT Zone and
recommends a reasonable mechanism for apportioning the costs to
applicants requesting to reduce on -site parking in the C -OT Zone
through payment of an in -lieu fee based on a cost for
replacement parking; and
WHEREAS, the cost for replacement parking is determined by
the estimated value of the land proposed for public parking ($4
per square foot) plus the estimated value for construction of a
fully improved parking space ($8 per square foot) times the size
of a standard parking space and aisle area, which equals a total
of $3,000 per parking space for an in -lieu fee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
SECTION 1. A Parking In -Lieu Fee of $3,000 per parking
space is hereby established for the C -OT Zone.
SECTION 2. The effective date of the Parking In -Lieu Fee
for the C -OT Zone is August 19, 2002.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
5
ATTACHMENT I
Proposed Parking In -Lieu Fee for the Downtown
Area Information Sheet
Purpose of Fee: To collect funds from appropriate sources for
the purpose of obtaining and /or constructing public parking
facilities in the Downtown Area.
Use of the Funds: All funds generated by imposition of this fee,
including any interest earned on these funds, will be used for
the financing of public facilities. Specifically, the funds
will be used to acquire, construct, remodel, landscape, light,
and /or furnish public parking facilities in the Downtown Area.
Relationship between Use of Fee /Need for Public Parking
Facilities in the Downtown Area and Development: This fee will
be imposed on all new uses and for enlargements of existing uses
in the Downtown Area that are required to provide parking spaces
in certain quantities outlined in Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark
City Code. According to Section .025, applicants may choose to
pay an in -lieu fee in order to reduce any portion of the parking
spaces otherwise required to be provided on -site.
Reasonableness of Fee: This fee was calculated as shown in
"March 27, 2002, Report of Parking Improvement Financing ". In
determining the fee to be charged to all new uses and
enlargements of existing uses in the Downtown Area, factors such
as architectural standards for the current, estimated costs per
square foot for a fully improved parking space; the required
square footage for regular and handicapped parking spaces,
including circulation; and the per- square -foot cost of the land
acquisition were considered. This project will be funded only
partially with Parking In -Lieu fees collected as a result of
this action.
Cost of the Project and Funds Generated by this Fee: Current,
estimated costs, based on architectural standards, indicate that
the cost of constructing one fully improved parking space,
including landscaping and lighting, is $8 per square foot. The
cost per square foot for land acquisition, including on -site
circulation, is $4 per square foot. This totals $12 per square
foot. A single parking space requires 250 square feet;
therefore, the estimated cost to construct a single parking
space is $3,000 per parking space. This cost will increase if
construction is delayed or if construction costs must be
partially or wholly financed with long -term debt. This fee is
anticipated to generate $3,000 per parking space. The revenues
generated by this fee will not exceed the cost of providing the
public parking facilities.
G',�, 4"
4t1?
Mi
wlrr
{ ..... /
r.
:'fffr /f:
ti�sst�
RPD- 7 -14u*
ME
<,7 r
om
�a
r :r.
Los Angeles Avenue
............... -. _............... ............_.......... ........
;t
j
e
f
Specific Plan Zoning Map
R -1
t1 r .. r {
0
RPD -20u
* Density bonus of up to 14du allowed with lot
consolidation and replacement structures, and
up to 20 du allowed upon meeting criteria for
low /very low income or senior housing.
k�
a
Induclriai
Park ` I t7
Not to Scale
C
M
gr
Leaend it
E] (R - 1) Single Family Residential r�
(R - 2) Two - Family Residential W
B(RPD) Residential Planned Development,
7- 14uniWacre *
® (C - 0) Office
® (C - 1) Neighborhood Commercial
(C - OT) Old Town Commercial
(C -2) General Commercial
(CPD) Commercial Planned Development
(1) Institutional
E] (M - 1) Industrial Park
tssisarne Specific Plan Boundary
Rich A-
C /
, r
industrial
Park
.a
-A
Fh-
Multi- Family Residential
* Density bonus of up to 14du allowed with lot
consolidation and replacement structures, and
up to 20 du allowed upon meeting criteria for
low /very low income or senior housing.
k�
a
Induclriai
Park ` I t7
Not to Scale
C
M
gr
Leaend it
E] (R - 1) Single Family Residential r�
(R - 2) Two - Family Residential W
B(RPD) Residential Planned Development,
7- 14uniWacre *
® (C - 0) Office
® (C - 1) Neighborhood Commercial
(C - OT) Old Town Commercial
(C -2) General Commercial
(CPD) Commercial Planned Development
(1) Institutional
E] (M - 1) Industrial Park
tssisarne Specific Plan Boundary
ATTACHMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
TO: Steve Kueny, City Manager
FROM: Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Theater On High Parking Improvement Financing
DATE: March 27, 2002
As requested the following may be used to structure a financing arrangement
and/ or approval condition for the Theater On High parking.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Current City code requires a theater of this size to provide 84 parking
spaces. This number is reduced by 50% in the downtown area by City
Ordinance. Section 17.32.025 provides that the remaining parking may be
further reduced by the payment of an "in lieu fee.
The theater is then required to have 42 public, non - exclusive parking spaces
including 2 handicapped spaces provided on or off site. Since the Theater On
High ( "Applicant ") must provide the spaces off site it would agree to pay for
the costs of constructing the public parking required for the theater use in
exchange for permission to have this parking off site.
Interim Temporary Improvements
The Redevelopment Agency will provide temporary parking improvements
at Agency expense of $17,700 and a land lease for $1 per year as approved
by the Board.
Permanent Improvements
The architectural standard for the cost for a fully improved parking space is
$ 8 per sq. ft including landscaping and lighting. A single space requires 250
,. X_* 0_�.
City Manager
Theater Parking
March 27, 2002
Page 2
sq. ft including on -site circulation or $2,000 per space. A land cost of $4.00
per sq. ft. or $1,000 will be included. The $4.00 is the approximate amount
the agency paid for the land in 1991.
Permanent financing would be for a period of 20 years with 3% interest.
The applicant would further agree that as:
1. In the event of default of the parking agreement, the Administrative
Permit would be revoked.
2. At no time shall the theater show adult type movies rated X, XX or XXX,
as such ratings are constituted on the effective date of approval of the
permit, or a similar rating if such ratings system changes from time to time.
At no time shall any portion of the theater be used for adult type businesses,
as such businesses are defined, from time to time, in the Moorpark
Municipal Code. These covenants shall remain in effect and shall run with
the land for the life of the project and any extension thereof.
3. Applicant agrees to maintain parking area free of litter during and
immediately after its performances.
4. No business signs will be located in the parking lot.
5. There will be no valet parking, preferred parking or reserved parking.
6. Payments for the permanent improvements will commence either 2 years
from date of permit approval or upon completion of construction of the
permanent improvements, whichever is later.
The Redevelopment Agency agrees to sweep the lot as needed and to pay for
cost of pavement, landscaping and lighting maintenance because it is public
parking.
CALCULATION:
Improvements - 42 parking improved spaces @ $ 2,000 = $84,000 - 20
Years = $ 4,200 /yr. - 12 months = $ 350 per month
City Manager
Theater Parking
March 27, 2002
Page 3
Land - 250 sq. ft. X 42 spaces = 10,500 sq. ft. @ $4 = $42,000 - 20 years =
$2,100 /yr. - 12 months = $175 per month.
MONTHLY PAYMENT:
The monthly payment with 3% interest would be $ 698.79.
COST TO AGENCY FOR TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENTS:
Property available on High Street across from Theater and at southwest
corner of Moorpark Avenue and High Street can provide approximately 200
parking spaces @ 250 sq. ft. per space including isle allowance and modest
landscaping. Improvement cost by City forces would include:
• 4 inches of base material: 436 T x $12 $ 51200
• In house labor $ 200
• 2 - A.C. surface handicapped spaces w/ markings $ 3,100
$11,100
• Oil surface, layout, telephone pole
parking barriers markings and other
miscellaneous improvements, etc. $ 3,500
SUBTOTAL $14,600
• Lighting $ 2,000
• Striping and annual restoration (2 years) $ 4,200
TOTAL $ 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Agency proceed with temporary improvement of parking
areas at a cost of $20,800 and enter into an annual ground lease at $1 per
year with Lawrence Janss Co.
City Manager
Theater Parking
March 27, 2002
Page 4
2. That the Agency provide financing for the costs of thethe required
permanent parking improvements at 3% interest for 20 years beginning at
the completion of the permanent improvements or 2 years from permit
approval whichever is later.
3. That the City Council set appropriate parking -in -lieu fees by
resolution.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
ITEM q._ g`_,,,
C77%, fir 1114 0!P^ " p v. 07 ^?
r
of L... ! -- UGC
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services�ll
DATE: June 12, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -_, Approving the Final
Assessment Engineer's Report for the Park and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement Assessment
District and Confirming the Levy for Fiscal Year
2002/03
SUMMARY
The Council is being asked to open the Public Hearing on the
continuation of the Parks and Recreation Maintenance and
Improvement Assessment District for FY 2002/03, receive
testimony, close the Public Hearing, approve the final
Engineer's Report, and adopt a resolution confirming the
assessment.
BACKGROUND
In July 1999, the City successfully established an assessment
district for the maintenance and improvement of City parks. The
District was initiated by the Council to provide funding in
place of AD 85 -1 (Park Maintenance Assessment District), which
was disbanded in July 1998 as a result of Proposition 218. The
current Maintenance District is based on a "special" assessment.
This means that the City assesses property owners for that
portion of park maintenance and improvement activities that
generate a "special" benefit. All activities that generate a
"general" benefit must be funded from non - assessment revenues
(typically General Fund and Park Improvement Fund).
\\mor _pri_serv\ home _folders\MLindley\Assessment Dist\final engineer report 2002 03 ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 2
The Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District
includes all existing 15 City parks. The amount of the
assessment levied to property may only increase by the Cost of
Living factor (CPI) for the Los Angeles Metropolitan area, and
not more than 3 percent in any year.
On February 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
2002 -1942 indicating its intent to continue the assessment for
FY 2002/03 and directing the preparation of the Engineer's
Report. On that date, the City selected Shilts Consultants to
prepare the report. On June 5, 2002, the City Council approved
the preliminary Engineer's Report for the Park and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement District for FY 2002/03 and set a
Public Hearing for June 19.
DISCUSSION
The City Council is being presented with the final Engineer's
Report for consideration and approval. By approving the
Engineer's Report, the Council will be establishing the
assessment rate, the formula used to spread the assessment, and
the City's contribution (comprised of General Fund and Park
Improvement Fund (PIF) for the maintenance and improvement of
parks. The boundaries for the Parks and Recreation Maintenance
and Improvement District contain all properties within the
City's incorporated limits.
The Assessment District includes all existing 15 City parks. The
Engineer's Report contains a determination regarding the
percentage of benefit deemed "special" and the percentage deemed
"general ", generated from the maintenance and improvement of
City parks and recreation facilities. The percentage figure
identified by the Engineer is 25 percent "general" benefit and
75 percent "special" benefit. This percentage is then applied to
the total park maintenance budget. Under Proposition 218, the
City can only assess property owners for the 75 percent portion
of the budget related to "special" benefits. Although 75
percent is identified as providing "special" benefit, and
consistent with previous years, it is proposed that property
owners be assessed for only approximately 16 percent of the
total park maintenance budget. The City's FY 02/03 contribution
\\ mor _pri_sery \home_folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 3
of 84 percent is significantly higher than previous years
because of a number of park improvements proposed in the budget.
Additionally, the Report identifies all properties in Moorpark
by type. A value has been assigned for each type of property,
with single family residential having a value of 1.00. A value
for all other property types is assigned based on the SFE. The
equivalent value is based on a formula that uses the average
number of people who could potentially live on, work at, or
otherwise use a property. Specifically, the Engineer finds SFE
values as follows:
Single Family Residential 1.00
Condominium .80
Multi - Family Residential .78
Mobile Homes .65
Commercial .70
Office 1.90
Shopping Center .70
Industrial .70
Self Storage or Parking Lot .03
(per dwelling unit)
(per 1/5 of acre)
In regards to undeveloped vacant property, the Engineer has
developed a three tiered rate structure. Vacant property will
be assessed at .25 of its equivalent SFE (for residential,
industrial, commercial, etc.). Once a development application
and the engineering plans have been submitted for vacant
property, it will be assessed at its SFE at a rate of .35 of the
developed rate, and vacant property for which development has
been approved will have a SFE equivalent of .65 of the developed
rate for that property type until fully developed.
Park Maintenance and Improvement Budget
The Engineer's Report addresses the estimated revenue to be
generated by the assessment (approximately $521,664) if the
assessment rate is approved as recommended. This is
approximately $21,000 more than was anticipated in FY 2001/02.
The report also identifies the non - assessment contribution,
which is noted in the Report as City Contribution (General Fund
and Park Improvement Fund). Consistent with Proposition 218, the
City covers all costs associated with park maintenance activity
expenditures that generate "general" benefits (these activities
comprise approximately 25 percent of the budget). Additionally,
\ \mor_pri_sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
V 4 4
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 4
the City traditionally covers a significant portion of the cost
associated with expenditures that generate "special" benefits.
The remaining costs associated with "special" benefits
(approximately 16 percent) are covered by the revenue collected
from the assessed levy.
The proposed FY 2002/03 Park Assessment District budget figure
of $3,248,328 includes $1,055,027 for operations and $2,206,001
for capital improvements. Of the operational expenditures, it
is estimated that $521,664 will be funded from collected park
assessments. It is proposed that the remaining, approximately
$533,363 in operational expenditures, be funded by City funds,
including $26,000 from the equipment replacement fund. Of the
$2,206,001 in proposed capital improvement projects, $2,193,301
will be funded from the Park Improvement Fund and $12,700 will
be funded by the General Fund.
FY 2002/03 Park Asst.
District Budget Summary
Proposed
Expenditures
Proposed
Funding
Operations
$1,055,027
Capital Park Projects
$2,206,001
Total Expenditure Budget
$3,261,028
Assessment Levy
$521,664
Park Improvement Fund
$2,193,301
Equipment Replacement
Fund
$ 26,000
General Fund
$520,063
Total Revenues
$3,261,028
As stated above, there are capital improvement projects in the
proposed FY 2002/03 budget. Those projects are identified in
Attachment A to this Report along with their proposed funding
source.
\ \mor_pri_sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
'i A a.�
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 5
Assessment Rate
The CPI for FY 00/01 was 3.7 percent. Since the approved
assessment has a CPI cap of 3 percent, the SFE was adjusted by
only 3 percent to $41.08. However, the approved assessment
language allows the City to carry over any difference in a CPI
that exceeds 3 percent to the following year, as long as it
adheres to the cap in subsequent years. The CPI increase for FY
01/02 is 2.1 percent (January 2002 above January 2001).
Including the .7 percent difference from FY 00/01, the total
adjustment is 2.8 percent and the proposed SFE rate for the
02/03 budget year is $42.24.
This proposed SFE rate adjustment is reflected in the Engineer's
Report, along with the proposed FY 2002/03 Budget. Based on this
action, the City's total non - assessment contribution would be
$2,739,364 ($2,193,301 Park Improvement Fund, $26,000 Equipment
Replacement Fund, and $576,454 General Fund) and total
assessment contributions would be $521,664. This represents a
ratio of 84 percent City funded and 16 percent assessment levy
funded, which is far greater than the established 25%/75% split.
Without capital projects, the split would be 51 percent City
funded and 49 percent assessment levy funded - again, still
significantly above the established ratio.
Public Hearing
The continuation of the Parks Maintenance and Improvement
District and rate adjustment requires a public hearing to be
held prior to the annual levy of assessment for the purpose of
receiving input and to hear any protest to the proposed
assessment. Notice of the City Council's Public Hearing on this
item was appropriately published and posted as required by law.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council:
1. Open the Public Hearing, receive testimony, and close
the public hearing;
2. Approve the Engineer's Report; and
\ \Mor pri sery \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 6
3. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- (Attachment B)
confirming the assessment for the Parks and Recreation
Maintenance and Improvement District for Fiscal Year
2002/03.
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
Park Assessment Engineer's Rpt
Page 7
ATTACHMENT A
FY 2002/03 CAPITAL PARK PROJECTS
FY 2002/03 Capital Park Projects
Cost -
Cost
P.I. Fund
G.F
AVCP
$20,000
Tennis Court Pavilion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Community Aquatic Facility
----------------------------- - - - - --
$175,000
---------------------------
(Design)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Monument Sign for Memorial
----------------------------- - - - - --
$2,000
---------------------------
Apricot Grove
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Replace Tennis Court Timers
----------------------------- - - - - --
---------------------------
$7,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Restroom/ Concession Facility
----------------------------- - - - - --
$260,000
---------------------------
Cont.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVCP Phase II
----------------------------- - - - - --
$1,490,000
---------------------------
Campus Park
State Contract Fees
$301
Community Center Park
Playground Equipment
$57,000
Peach Hill Park
Stand Alone Play Equip.
$3,700
Miller Park
Replace Tennis Court Timers
$2,000
Mountain Meadows Park
$98,000
Playground Equip.
Poindexter Park
Picnic Furniture
$4,000
Glenwood Park
Play Equipment & ADA Surfacing
$11,000
Villa Campesina Park
Play Equipment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$50,000
----------------------------- - - - - --
--------------------- - - - - --
Half -Court Basketball
$20,000
----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monument Sign
$6,000
Sub Total -
$2,193,301
12,700
Park Improvement Fund
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final engineer report
2002 03 ccagd.doc
C �t 4R T 17 3
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENGINEER'S
REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND
ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2002/03 FOR THE PARKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, by its Resolution No. 99 -1625,
after receiving a weighted majority of ballots in support of the
proposed assessment, this Council ordered the formation of and
levied the first assessment within the City of Moorpark Parks and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the "Assessment
District ") pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the
California Constitution, and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972 (the "Act "), Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets
and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500 thereof); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1942, the City Council
ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Parks and
Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the "District ")
for fiscal year 2002 -03; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Engineer's Report
was prepared by Shilts Consultants, Inc., Engineer of Work, in
accordance with Section 22565, et. seq., of the Streets and
Highways Code (the "Report ") and Article XIIID of the California
Constitution; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2002 -1978, the City Council
preliminarily approved the Engineer's Report for said District
and set a date for a Public Hearing; and
WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the City
Clerk and duly considered by this Council and found to be
sufficient in every particular, whereupon it was determined that
the report should stand as the Engineer's Report for all
subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the aforesaid
resolution, and that June 19, 2002, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. and
the Council Chambers, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California 93021, were appointed as the time and place for a
\\mor _pri_serv\ home _folders\MLindley\Assessment Dist \final resolution 02 03.doc
y.: �_. am
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
hearing by this Council on the question of the levy of the
proposed assessment, notice of which hearing was given as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, at the appointed time and place the hearing was
duly and regularly held, and all persons interested and desiring
to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all
matters and things pertaining to the levy were fully heard and
considered by the Council, and all oral statements and all
written protests or communications were duly heard, considered
and overruled, and this council thereby acquired jurisdiction to
order the levy and the confirmation of the diagram and assessment
prepared by and made a part of the Engineer's Report to pay the
costs and expenses thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The public interest, convenience and necessity
require that the levy be made.
SECTION 2. The Assessment District benefited by the
improvements and assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof,
and the exterior boundaries thereof, are as shown by a map
thereof filed in the office of the City Clerk, which map is made
a part hereof by reference thereto.
SECTION 3. The Engineer's Report as a whole and each
part thereof, to wit:
(a) the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total
costs and expenses of maintaining the improvements and of
the incidental expenses in connection therewith;
(b) the diagram showing the assessment district, plans
and specifications for the improvements to be maintained
and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective lots
and parcels of land within the Assessment District; and
(c) the assessment of the total amount of the cost and
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final
resolution 02 03.doc
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 3
expenses of the proposed maintenance of the improvements
upon the several lots and parcels of land in the Assessment
District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to
be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from
the maintenance, and of the expenses incidental thereto;
are finally approved and confirmed.
SECTION 4. Final adoption and approval of the Engineer's
Report as a whole, and of the plans and specifications, estimate
of the costs and expenses, the diagram and the assessment, as
contained in the report as hereinabove determined and ordered, is
intended to and shall refer and apply to the report, or any
portion thereof as amended, modified, or revised or corrected by,
or pursuant to and in accordance with, any resolution or order,
if any, heretofore duly adopted or made by this Council.
SECTION 5.
of the maintenance
hereby levied. For
of the Landscaping
made to the Res(
Report.
The assessment to pay the costs and expenses
of the improvements for fiscal year 2002 -03 is
further particulars pursuant to the provisions
and Lighting Act of 1972, reference is hereby
Dlution Directing Preparation of Engineer's
SECTION 6. Based on the oral and documentary evidence,
including the Engineer's Report, offered and received at the
hearing, this Council expressly finds and determines (a) that
each of the several lots and parcels of land will be specially
benefited by the maintenance of the improvements at least in the
amount if not more than the amount, of the assessment apportioned
against the lots and parcels of land, respectively, and (b) that
there is substantial evidence to support, and the weight of the
evidence preponderates in favor of, the aforesaid finding and
determination as to special benefits.
SECTION 7. Immediately upon the adoption of this
resolution, but in no event later than the third Monday in August
following such adoption, the City Clerk shall file a certified
copy of the diagram and assessment and a certified copy of this
resolution with the Auditor of the County of Ventura. Upon such
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final
resolution 02 03.doc
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 4
filing, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment
roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of assessment
thereupon as shown in the assessment. The assessments shall be
collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes
are collected and all laws providing for the collection and
enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and
enforcement of the assessments, After collection by the County,
the net amount of the assessments, after deduction of any
compensation due the County for collection, shall be paid to the
City of Moorpark Parks and Recreation Maintenance and Improvement
District.
SECTION 8. Upon receipt of the moneys representing
assessments collected by the County, the County shall deposit the
moneys in the City Treasury to the credit of the improvement fund
previously established under the distinctive designation of the
Assessment District. Moneys in the improvement fund shall be
expended only for the maintenance, servicing, construction or
installation of the improvements.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
\ \mor_pri_serv\ home _folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \final
resolution 02 03.doc
rof
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
ITEM_ .�._�
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo .
By: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager P11t,
DATE: June 6, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider an Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance No. 244 that
Established Development Standards and Zones for the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan (SP -8 /SP 93 -1)
BACKGROUND
On August 19, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 244,
amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish development standards
and zones for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan (Specific Plan
8 /Specific Plan 93 -1). Measure "S ", adopted by Moorpark voters on
January 12, 1999, amended the City's General Plan by removing the
designations for and references to development of the Hidden Creek
Ranch Specific Plan property.
On July 21, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -1637,
directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing,
and provide a recommendation to the City Council pertaining to
amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Code to bring properties
in the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan into consistency with
Measure "S ". On May 28, 2002, the Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the recision of Ordinance No. 244. After closing
the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC
2002 -424 (attached), recommending to the City Council recision of
Ordinance No. 244 in order to achieve consistency of the City's
Zoning Ordinance with its General Plan.
DISCUSSION
Section 65860 of the Government Code requires City Zoning
Ordinances to be consistent with the General Plan. Under Measure
"S ", the Hidden Creek Ranch property no longer has a designated use
in the City's General Plan, and falls solely under the jurisdiction
of the County General Plan, which has the property designated for
open space uses. The County zoning for the property is
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002 Meeting
Page No. 2
Agricultural Exclusive, a zoning category consistent with the Open
Space designation of the County General Plan.
Although the development standards and zones established by
Ordinance No. 244 have no legal effect at this time, this ordinance
should be rescinded to maintain consistency between the City's
Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. A draft ordinance is attached
for City Council consideration to rescind Ordinance No. 244.
Public Notification
The public hearing before the City Council was noticed with a 1/8
page publication in the Moorpark Star on Saturday, June 8, 2002, in
accordance with Sections 65854 and 65091 of the Government Code.
Affected property owners were also sent a copy of the notice.
Environmental Documentation
The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
(CEQA) applies to projects that have a potential for resulting in
either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The
action of rescinding an ordinance that has no legal effect does not
meet the definition of a project under CEQA, and is therefore not
subject to environmental review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close
the public hearing; and
2. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading.
Attachments:
1. Draft City of Moorpark Ordinance to Rescind Ordinance No. 244.
2. Planning Commission Resolution PC 2002 -424 Recommending to the
City Council Recision of Ordinance No. 244.
3. City Council Resolution No. 99 -1637.
4. Ordinance No. 244 (including map of affected property).
S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020619 Ord. 244 Recision.doc
If . ,t`), , r,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 244,
WHICH ADOPTED SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING
DESIGNATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
PROPERTIES WITHIN HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 8 /SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1)
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1998, Resolution No. 98 -1487 was
adopted, approving the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan and
related amendments to the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 1998, Ordinance No. 244 was adopted
establishing specific plan zoning designations and development
standards for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, on January 12, 1999, Initiative Measure "S" was
adopted by the voters of the City of Moorpark, removing the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan from the City's General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1999, the City Council directed the
Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide
a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the General Plan
and Zoning Code to bring the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
properties into consistency with Initiative Measure "S "; and
WHEREAS, Section 65860 of the Government Code requires that
City Zoning Ordinances be consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public
hearing on May 28, 2002, adopted Resolution PC- 2002 -424
recommending that the City Council rescind Ordinance No. 244;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council on , 2002, conducted a
public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and
reached its decision; and
WHEREAS, the recision of Ordinance No. 244 is not a project
subject to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended.
ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No.
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 244 is rescinded in its entirety.
SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more section,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days after its passage and adoption.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of
original Ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and
shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption
thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star
a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of
the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby
designated for that purpose.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \cc 020619 Rescind Ord 244.doc
RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -424
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO
RESCIND ORDINANCE NO. 244, WHICH ADOPTED
SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN
8 /SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1)
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1998, Resolution No. 98 -1487 was
adopted, approving the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan and
related amendments to the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 1998, Ordinance No. 244 was adopted
establishing specific plan zoning designations and development
standards for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, on January 12, 1999, Initiative Measure "S" was
adopted by the voters of the City of Moorpark, removing the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan from the City's General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, Initiative Measure "S" also established a City
Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB), coterminous with the City's
Sphere of Influence in effect on January 1, 1998, that excluded
the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan property; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1999 the City Council directed the
Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide
a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the General Plan
and Zoning Code to bring the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
properties into consistency with Initiative Measure "S "; and
WHEREAS, Section 65860 of the Government Code requires that
City Zoning Ordinances be consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on May 28, 2002,
the Planning Commission considered a Resolution recommending to
the City Council the recision of Ordinance No. 244; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 28, 2002, the Planning
Commission conducted public hearings and received public
testimony, and after receiving oral and written public
testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 424 rescind Ord. 244 SP -8.doc
Modified: 06/07/02
ATTACHMENT 2 C� "' ` e�
RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -424
Recision of Ord. 244
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission recommends to the City
Council approval of an Ordinance to rescind Ordinance No. 244.
SECTION 2. The Community Development Director shall
certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a
cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original
resolutions.
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Parvin and DiCecco and Chair Otto
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: Commissioners Haller and Landis
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF MAY, 2002
William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Barry K. Hogan
Community Development Director
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 424 rescind Ord. 244 SP -8.doc
Modified: 06/07/02
RESOLUTION NO. 99 -1637
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO STUDY, SET A PUBLIC HEARING AND PROVIDE
A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL PERTAINING TO
AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE
RELATED TO THOSE PROPERTIES CONTAINED WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8 /HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
NECESSARY TO BRING SAID PROPERTIES INTO CONSISTENCY
WITH INITIATIVE MEASURE "S" ADOPTED BY THE VOTERS OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK ON JANUARY 12, 1999
WHEREAS, Section 65350 et. seq. of Article Six of the
Government Code of the State of California provides the
authority to cities to amend an adopted General Plan, subject to
the procedure as contained in such Article; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.60.020 of the Municipal Code provides
that the City Council may initiate proceedings to consider
amendments to the Zoning Code by the adoption of a resolution of
intention requesting the Planning Commission to set the matter
for study, public hearing, and recommendation within a
reasonable time.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council does hereby authorize
the initiation of proceedings to consider amendments to the
General Plan, Zoning Map and Zoning Code of the City of
Moorpark, for the purpose of considering and establishing land
use designations, zoning districts and other appropriate
provisions consistent with the voter adopted initiative, Measure
"S" (SOAR), that may be necessary to implement Measure "S" as it
may apply to those properties situated within the boundary of
Specific Plan No. 8, Hidden Creek Ranch.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission is hereby directed
to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation to
the City Council pertaining to those amendments to the City of
Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Code, as specified within
Section 1 above, necessary to implement the voter adopted
initiative measure, Measure "S" (SOAR) upon all properties
situated within the boundary of Specific Plan No. 8, Hidden
Creek Ranch.
ATTACHMENT 3 �
Resolution No. 99 -1637
Page 2
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of Tiily l9U9
ATTEST:
G. 4L
Deborah S. TraffengtWh7f, City Clerk
Resolution No. 99 -1637
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of
Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing Resolution No. 99 -1637 was adopted by the
City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the
21st day of July, 1999, and that the same was adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Harper, Wozniak and Mayor
Hunter
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Rodgers
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 12th
day of February, 2001.
Deborah S. Traffenste t, City Clerk
(seal)
ORDINANCE NO. 244
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN 8 ZONING
DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE HIDDEN CREEK
RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, (SPECIFIC PLAN 8 /SPECIFIC PLAN 93-1); AND,
ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SAID PROPERTIES;
AND, AMENDING TITLE 17, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK TO PLACE SUCH REGULATIONS AS
CHAPTER 17.70 WITHIN SAID CODE; AND, AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK TO REFLECT THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN.
Whereas, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 1, 1997, continued public hearings on
October 8, 22, November 12, and December 3, 10, 1997, January 7, 21, March 25, April 1, May 6,
20, 27, June 3, 10, 17 and July 1 and 15, 1998, the City Council considered the application filed by
Hidden Creek Ranch Partners, L.P., also known as Messenger Investment Company, for the Hidden
Creek Ranch Specific Plan Project, consisting of Specific Plan No. 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General
Plan Amendment 93 -1, and Zone Change 93 -3, for an approximately 4323 acre site located within
the City of Moorpark Area of Interest in Ventura County contiguous to the City northerly boundary
near Moorpark College and the Campus Park and Varsity Park residential areas, and easterly and
southerly of Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park and incorporating more or less Assessor Parcel
Numbers: 500- 0120 -035, -55, -065; 500 -0- 170 -135, -205, -255, -285, -295, -305, -315, -325, -335,
-345, -355, -365, -375; 500- 0- 180 -045, -055, -075, -105, -115; 500 -0- 281 -035, -045, -165, -175,
-185, -195, -205, -215; 500 -0- 292 -065, -135, -145; 615 -0 -110 -205, -215; and, 615 -0- 150 -185; and,
Whereas, the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark did adopt Resolution 96 -325
recommending to the City Council approval of Specific Plan 8 /Specific Plan 93 -1, General Plan
Amendment 93 -1, Zone Change 93 -3, and certification of the project EIR, subject to findings and
amendments incorporated into that resolution; and,
Whereas, the City Council on January 21, 1998, adopted Resolution 98 -1425 to certify a
Final Environmental Impact Report for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan as having been
completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA
Guidelines, and the City's CEQA procedures and meeting all findings required by CEQA; and,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark, California is
amended by adding thereto Chapter 17.70 as contained and more fully described in
Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;
ATTACHMENT 4 ell If
Ordinance No. 244
Page 2
TITLE 17.70
SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
Sections:
17.70.010
Purpose and Intent
17.70.020
Definitions
17.70.030
General Provisions
17.70.040
Residential Development Standards
17.70.050
Commercial Planned Development
17.70.060
Public and Institutional
17.70.070
Parks and Open Space
17.70.080
Sign Regulations
17.70.090
Parking Regulations
17.70.100
Historic, Native Oak and Mature Trees
17.70.110
Outdoor Lighting Controls
Section 2. Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark, California is
amended by amending the official zoning map of the city as referenced in Section
17.04.020 of the Moorpark Municipal Code by adding thereto the designation SP 93-
1 /SP -8 and by applying said designation to the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
area as shown in Attachment B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
Section 3. Whenever a conflict shall arise between provisions of the Specific Plan and the
Zoning Code as to the meaning of terms, uses permitted, standards applicable or
administration thereof, the Specific Plan shall prevail.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF AUGUST, 1998
Ordinance No. 244
Page 3
ATTACHMENTS:
Chapter 17.70(added) Moorpark Zoning Code
Zoning Map Amendment - Specific Plan 93 -1 /Specific Plan 8 Boundary
Designation
Ordinance No. 244
Page 4
TITLE 17.70
SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
ATTACHMENT A
Ordinance No. 244
Page 5
TITLE 17.70 SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1 /SPECIFIC PLAN 8 HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
17.70.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT
The development regulations contained herein have been establisned to pros criteria for the
development of the planning areas within the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan and are
intended to be adopted as a new chapter in Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code.
Implementation of the regulations set forth in this section is intended to ensure that future
development is coordinated and consistent with the goals and policies of the Specific Plan and
the City's General Plan.
The following regulations provide for the arrangement, development, and use of residential.
open space, commercial, publicAnstitutional, golf course, and equestrian zoned areas %whin the
Specific Plan area, while insuring substantial compliance with the intent and provisions of the
City's ordinances. Application of these regulations is intended to encourage the most
appropriate use of the land. create a harmonious relationship among land uses, and protect the
health, safety. and eeneral welfare of the community.
Certain development requirements generally are included as conditions of approval for
subdivisions and development permits, and may not be contained in the Development
Regulations for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan or in the City's Municipal Code and
Subdivision Ordinance. Such development requirements include. but are not limited to: On -site
lighting standards, fixtures. lumen levels, coverage mounting and pole height. street lighting
standards: front yard landscaping: private recreation area requirements for single- family and
multi- family development. bus shelters. quantities and sizing of trees and shrubs. general
review; approval of landscaping and imgation plans: review and approval of conditions,
covenants and restrictions: requirements for homeowner! property owner associations. rain
gutters; yard drains, trash and recycling enclosures, slough wall for slopes adjacent to street
rights -of -way; and concrete driveways. The City may. at its discretion. condition any
subdivision and,,or development permit on all such matters
17.70.020 DEFINITIONS
Words and terms used in the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan Development Regulations
shall have the same definitions as given in the City ofMoorpark Municipal Code, including Title
17, Zoning.
17.70.030 GENERAL PROVISIONS
I 1111 n1111MR111II I II't III 11 111I':.Thd dIDdVel( Ski'r 'tldhtlRCLUDdti'ihNftPlAtrsift(B 1htiF fiddttf CWdKiRdWhI 1111111111111111111 1H 11111 ;11
Specific Plan area. The following general provisions apply to all zone districts within the
Specific Plan area.
ATTACHMENT:A
Ordinance No. 244
Page 6
The City Municipal Code shall regulate development in the Specific Plan, except as
modified by the regulations contained herein. In such cases where the Specific Plan
development regulations conflict with those in other Chapters of Title 17 of the City
Municipal Code, the Specific Plan development standards shall apply. Any future
amendments to the City Municipal Code, which are not addressed by the Hidden Creek
Ranch Specific Plan, shall also apply to the Specific Plan area, as applicable.
The establishment and changes ofthe zone district classification on land in the Specific Plan
area shall be as described in this Chapter and shall be adopted by an ordinance amending
the City zoning map in the manner set forth in Chapter 17.60, Title 17, of the Cit'•
Municipal Code. The zone districts for the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan shall be
consistent with the Specific Plan Land Use Plan, Exhibit 7.
All land use entitlements and permits issued within the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan
area shall be consistent with the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan.
4. Because it is infeasible to compose legislative language which encompasses all conceivable
land -use situations, the Director of Community Development shall have the power to
interpret the regulations contained in this Specific Plan, when such interpretation is
necessitated by a lack of specificity in such regulations.
5. Procedures for the processing of land use entitlement, including permits and variances. for
the Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan area, shall be the same as defiled in Chapter 17.44
of Title 17 of the Moorpark Municipal Code.
17.70.040 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
The purpose of these regulations is to provide assurances that residential development
conforms to the City of Moorpark General Plan requirements for Specific Plan No. 8. These
standards also provide for a variety of single- family detached, attached and multi- family
dwellings units with development standards and regulations sped ficallyapplicable to Hidden
Creek Ranch.
17.70.040.1 Rural High Residential (RH)
Proposed Density: 0 - 0.7 du /ac.
The purpose of the RH designation is to provide for very low density single family
detached dwelling units in hillside areas. Development in keeping with the natural
amenities of these areas is encouraged through the preservation of unique scenic
resources as community assets. A density of up to one dwelling unit per two toss acres
is permitted within this zone.
The standards of the City of Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apply except as otherwise
noted below.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 7
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1 herein
shall apply.
1. Minimum lot area: one acre.
2. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: Minimum of 25 feet. The front setbacks of the dwelling units shall be
varied so as to provide visual variety.
b. Side: 10 feet per side for buildings of less than 25 feet in height, and 15 feet
per side for buildings higher than 25 feet in height.
c. Rear: 20 feet
d. Side street: 10 feet
Accessory Structures (excluding detached garages, and second dwelling units,
which shall conform to the standards under item 2, above):
a. Front: 25 feet, however, any structure in front of the primary residence shall
have architectural treatment and materials similartothe primary residence.
b. Sides: 10 feet
c. Rear: 15 feet
3. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and four feet into the required
frontand rear vards. Such elements shall not be closer than two feet to a tine
mid -way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
4. Maximum building height (excluding accessory buildings):
Thirty -five (35) feet, as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the structure.
Maximum height of accessory structures shall be 15 feet, except barns and
stables which may be up to 35 feet.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 8
PERMITTED LAND USES
Purpose: The purpose of this section is to list in matrix form the land uses permitted within each of the Land
Use Districts shown on the Land Use Plan. The City Zoning Code should be referenced for uses not listed
(Section 17.20.030) and for Exemptions from Zoning Clearances (Section 17.20.040).
Permitted uses in parks, open space and residential zones.
Permitted uses in parks, open space and residential zones are set out in Table 17.70 -1
Note: An approved residential planned development permit is required for five (5) or more lots in the
RH, L, ML, M, H, VHl and VH2 Zones.
The key for Table 17.70 -1 is as follows:
[Blank] Not permitted
O Permitted by zone clearance
■ Administrative permit
♦ Planning commission- approved planned development permit
❑ City council- approved planned development permit
0 Planning commission - approved conditional use permit
Q City council- approved conditional use permit
Table 17.70 -1
PERMITTED USES IN PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES
RH L ML M H VH1 VH2 GC OS
Agriculture and agricultural operations (no retail except
as indicated).
Animal husbandry: Without structures 1.6
V 0 V 0' o' V' 0,
With structures: total GFA per lot:
Up to 1,000 sq. ft.
0
Over 1,000 to 5,000 sq. ft.
Over 5,000 to 20,000 sq. ft.
Over 20,000 to 100,000 sq. ft.
Over 100,000 sq. ft.
Apiculture ',6
V
More animals than are permitted by Section
17.28.030C of the Moorpark Zoning Code
Bams and Stables
■ ■ ■
Astronomical observatory
Q
Contractors' service and storage yards and buildings
Crop production`
Q
Wholesale nursery
Firewood operations
Greenhouse, hothouses and the like: total GFA per loO
Up to 1,000 sq. ft.
1,000 to over 100,000 sq. ft.
Offices'
Produce stands, retail'
Accessory uses to crop production,
■
Fuel storage'
Insecticides for pest control
Packing, storage or prelim. processing of
crops: Without structure''
Animals, nonagricultural (see also Dwellings, accessory
uses and structures)'
SEE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
Boardinghouses and bed - and - breakfast inns
June 25, 1998
1V]
V
O
O
0
O
0
Ordinance No. 244
Page 9
June 25, 1998
RH
L
ML
M
H
VHI VH2 GC OS
Care facilities' (see also H&SC and W &IC)
Day; Care of 12 or fewer persons (State law
requirement related to day care facilities for 7 -12)
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Care of 13 or more persons
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Intermediate: Care of 7 or more persons
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Residential: Care of 6 or fewer persons
V
V
V
V
V
Care of 7 or more persons
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cemeteries
0
0
0
0
Churches, synagogue and other buildings used for
religious worship
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Clubhouses (no alcoholic beverages)
(with alcoholic beverages)
Q
Communications facilities
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Drilling, temporary geologic (testing only)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Dwelling, single - family'`
(including Z, zero, and cluster lots)
Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
C
Dwellings, multifamily
Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64
❑
❑
❑
Dwellings, accessory structures
For human habitation:
Mobilehome/RV as temporary dwelling during
construction2
V
V
V
V
V
Second dwelling2
■
■
■
■
■
Room additions
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Not for human habitation (with or without bathroom):
Second story patio /deck
■
■
■
■
■
E
■
Accessory structure over 120 sq. ft.
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Over 1,000 sq. ft. per structure; or over
2,000 sq. ft. per lot
Antenna, ground- mounted (noncommercial),
above 40 ft.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dwellings, accessory uses
Aviaries
0
0
Farm animalS2 (other than horses/ponies)
V
V
0
Horses/ponies'
V
V
0
Pet animals2
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
More animals than are permitted
by Section 17.28.030C
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
Home occupation
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Storage, open"
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Education and training
Schools, elementary and secondary (boarding and
nonboarding)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor
(less than three in one year)
0
Government buildings
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fire stations
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Law enforcement facilities
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Grading 1.6
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V V
Within an overlay zone SEE SECTION
17.36 OF
MOORP.4RK ZONING CODE
Libraries
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mineral resource development
0 0
June 25, 1998
Ordinance No. 244
Page 10
RH L ML M H VH1 VH2 GC OS
Mining and accessory uses'
0
0
Less than 9 months in duration
0
0
Oil and gas exploration and production'
0
0
0
Model homes/lot sales'
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Motion picture and TV production, and related activities
and structures
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Temporary (max. 42 days in any 180 -day period)`76
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Parking Lots
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Pastures and training areas
■
■
Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Public utility facilities, excluding offices and service yards' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Recreational Vehicle Storage'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Recreational sport and athletic facilities
Community centers/clubhouses
(serving surrounding neighborhood)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fields, athletic (to serve surrounding neighborhood)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Golf courses, except miniature golf-"
0
Parks (to serve the neighborhood)
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
0
With buildings
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Swimming/tennis facilities, basketball/volleyball courts,
tot lots, picnic tables/barbecue
Recreation projects, city- initiated'
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Riding stables
0
With accessory lodging facilities
With outdoor arenas/accessory structures
Shade structures
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
Storage of building materials, temporary"
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Uses and structures, accessory (other than to agric.
animals or dwellings)'
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
Dwelling, caretaker SEE SECTION 17.44.080A MOORPARK ZONING CODE
Water production, storage and distribution facilities:
Private purveyors"'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notes for Table 17.70 -1:
1. See also Section 17.20.040 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
2. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
3. This use is only permitted in association with a residential planned development permit, and
the intended purpose is to provide storage area for resident owned recreational vehicles only.
4. See Chapter 17.32 for parking standard of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
5. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations.
6. Only permitted if the applicant can provide evidence to the Director of Community
Development that there will not be significant impact to recorded archaeological sites,
sensitive biological habitat, mature trees, and all native oak trees.
7. Small domestic animals only.
8. The golf course permitted in Planning Unit 45 is restricted to a Links Format golf course. This
course would consist of teeboxes, limited fairways, and greens created within the natural
surrounding area, with minimal disturbance of the natural area
June 25, 1998
Ordinance No. 244
Page 11
NATURAL AREA
(where lots abut open space) FUEL MODIFICATION AREA -
100' FROM BUILDING SITE
P.L. -
SLOPE AREA
20'
MIN. REAR SETBACK
P.L.
RESIDENCE
P.L.
10,
® MIN. SIDE
SETBACK
I
25,
- .• MIN.
' alternate _
FRONT SETBACK
driveway
configurati n _
-- -- --
Iz
pR0R`4TY LIME
MIN. LOT AREA: 43,560 S.f.; CURB
one acre
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN: RURAL HIGH PER�JTY,
Ordinance No. 244
Page 12
5. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions ofthe Moorpark Zoning Code,
except that sound attenuation walls may be built to a height as required by a Cin_
approved Noise Study.
6. Parking:
Parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code,
except as modified herein:
17.70.040.2 Low Density Residential (L)
Proposed Density: 0.7 - 1.0 du /ac.
The purpose of the Low Density Residential designation is to provide for low density
single family detached residential units along with associated amenities. The density_
permitted in this zone is up to one dwelling unit per gross acre.
The standards of the City of Moorpark's R -P -D zone shall apply except as othen{ise
noted below.
A. Pertnitted/Administrative/Planned Development Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1 herein
shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Minimum lot area: 20,000 square feet, with an average of one acre within
individual Planning Units.
2. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: 25 feet. The front setbacks of dwelling units shall be varied so as to
provide visual variety.
b. Side: 10 feet per side for buildings with heights of less than 25 feet, and 15
feet per side for buildings with heights over 25 feet.
c. Rear: 20 feet
d. Side Street: 10 feet
Accessory Structures (excluding detached garages, and second dwelling units,
which shall conform to the standards under item 2, above):
Ordinance No. 244
Page 13
NATURAL AREA
(where lots abut open space)
P. L.
FUEL MODIFICATION AREA -
100' FROM BUILDING SITE
SLOPEIAREA
RESIDENCE
PLa ti 121
1
�
Qalternate ` `•. •" -
driveway _
configurat
MIN. LOT AREA: 20,000 s.f.
15'
MIN. REAR SETBACK
P.L.
10'
MIN. SIDE
SETBACK
25'
MIN.
FRONT FRONT SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
CURB
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN: LOW DENSITY
Ordinance No. 244
Page 14
a. Front: 25 feet, however, any structure in front of the primary residence shall
have architectural treatment and materials similar to the primary residence.
b. Sides: 10 feet
c. Rear: 15 feet
3. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and four feet into the required front
and rear yards. Such elements shall not be closer than 2 feet to aline mid -way
between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
4. Maximum building height (excluding accessory buildings):
Thirty -five (35) feet, as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the structure.
Maximum height of accessory buildings shall be 15 feet, except for barns and
stables which may be up to 35 feet.
5. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of City Codes. except that
screen walls may be built to a height as required by a City approved Noise
Study.
6. Parking:
Parking shall comply with Chapter 1732 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code,
except as modified herein:
17.70.040.3 Medium Low Density (ML)
Proposed Density: 1.0 - 2.0 du /ac.
The purpose ofthe ML designation is to promote low-density single family dwelling units
on varied large size lots. A density of up to two dwelling units per gross acre is
permitted in this zone.
The standards of the City Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apply except as otherwise
noted below.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 15
A. Permitted /Administrative/Planned Development PermiVConditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1
herein shall apply.
1. Minimum lot area: 15,000 square feet.
2. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: 20 feet. The front setbacks of dwelling units shall be varied so as
to provide visual variety.
b. Side: 10 feet per side facing a public street and 5 feet per side for interior
lots where buildings are less than 25 feet in height, or 2 story; ( second story
with windows adjacent to side shall be 10 feet clear to side lot line) and 15
feet per side where buildings exceed 25 feet in height.
c. Rear: 20 feet
d. Side Street: 10 feet
Accessory Structures (including detached garages and second dwel ling units):
a. Front: 25 feet, however, any structure in front of the priman. residence
shall have architectural treatment and materials similar to the pnmarv_
residence.
b. Sides: 5 feet
c. Rear: 10 feet
3. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimnevs, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and four feet into the required front
and rear yards. Such elements shall not be closer than two feet to a line mid-
way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
4. Maximum building height (excluding accessory buildings):
Thirty-five (35) feet, as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the
structure.
Maximum height ofaccessory buildings shall be 15 feet, except for barns and
stables which may be 35 feet.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 16
NATURAL AREA
(where lots abut open space) FUEL MODIFICATION AREA -
100' FROM BUILDING SITE
P. L. \
SLOPE AREA
10'
MIN. REAR SETBACK
P. L.
REStDENVCE
Ii
P.L. —!
5'
® MIN. SIDE
SETBACK
10' WITH WINDOWS
1 _ 25'
MIN.
alternate ' . -
FRONT SETBACK
driveway _
configurat oQ '.'
MIN. LOT AREA: 15,000 S.f. PROPERTY L'JrE
CURS
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN: MEDIUM LOW DENSITY
Ordinance No. 244
Page 17
5. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions ofthe Moorpark Zoning
Code, except that sound attenuation walls to a height as required by a Citv_
approved Noise Study.
6. Parking:
Parking shall comply with Title 17, Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code, except as modified herein_
17.70.040.4 Medium Density Residential (M)
Proposed Density: 2.0 - 4.0 du /ac.
The purpose ofthe M designation is to allow single family detached homes on moderate
sized tots. A density of up to four (4) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted in this
zone.
The standards of the City of Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apply except as provided
below.
A. Permitted,Administrative/Planned Development PermitiConditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative. and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1
herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Minimum lot area. 5,500 square feet.
2. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: 20 feet to the building. The front setbacks for street frontages shall
be varied so as to provide visual variety.
b. Side: 5 feet per side and 10 feet per second story with window facing side
yard
c. Rear: 15 feet
d. Side Street: 10 feet
Ordinance No. 244
Page 18
Accessory Structures:
a. Front: 20 feet, however, any structure in front of the primary residence
shall have architectural treatment and materials similar to the priman*
residence.
b. Sides: 5 feet
c. Rear: 10 feet
3. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and two feet into the required front
-and rear yards. Such elements shall not be closer than two feet to aline mid-
way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
4. Maximum building height:
Thirty -five (35) feet, main residence, fifteen (15) feet for any accessory
structures, as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the structure.
5. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of City- Codes, except that
screen walls may be built to a maximum height as required by a City approved
Noise Studv.
6. Parking:
Parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City Moorpark Zoning
Code.
17,70.040.5 High Density Residential (H)
Proposed Density: 4.0 - 7.0 du /ac.
The H designation is intended to permit development of a range of residential units
including single - family detached homes, zero orz -lot line homes, single - family attached
homes, cluster housing, and housing for senior citizens. A density of up to seven
dwelling units per gross acre is permitted in Planning Units with this designation. The
standards of the City of Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apply except as otherwise
noted below.
Arl
Ordinance No. 244
Page 19
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1
herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
Single Family Detached
1. Minimum lot area. 4,000 square feet.
2. Minimum lot width: 40 feet, as measured from the minimum front building
setback line.
3. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: 20 feet to the building. The front setbacks shall be varied so as to
provide visual variety.
b. Side: 5 feet per side and 10 feet per side facing a public street. Zero lot
lines shall also be permitted, in which case, a minimum 10 foot separation
shall be maintained between structures.
c. Rear: 10 feet, except where 2 story residences with windows face the
adjacent property line, the rear setback shall be 15 feet for the main
building. Two story buildings shall be setback 10 feet.
Single Family Attached
4. Minimum site area per dwelling unit: 3,000 square feet
5. Minimum lot widthNot applicable
6. Minimum building setbacks:
a. A minimum landscaped setback of 20 feet for any arterial street shall be
maintained, and 15 feet from any collector.
b. On residential roads, loop or cul -de -sac streets setbacks shall be
maintained as follows: 10 feet to the building.
c. A minimum building separation of 6 feet shall be maintained between
buildings on the same lot, except that no detached dwelling unit shall be
closer than 10 feet to another detached unit.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 20
NATURAL AREA
(where lots abut open space)
P. L. -,,
P.L.
FUEL MODIFICATION AREA -
100' FROM BUILDING SITE
SLOPE AREA
RES:GENCE
alternate
driveway _
: configurat n
— -- _7
MIN. LOT ARE A: 5 500 s.f. j
9
O
15'
MIN. REAR SETBACK
P. L.
5'
.MIN. SIDE
SETBACK
10' WITH WINDOWS
20'
MIN.
FRONT SETBACK
PROPERTY LNE
CURB
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN: MEDIUM DENSITY
Ordinance No. 244
Page 21
Single Family Detached /Attached
7. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and two feet into the required front
and rear yards. Such elements shall not be closer than two feet to aline mid-
way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
8. Maximum building height:
Thirty-five (35) feet. 3 story; fifteen (15) feet for accessory structures, as
averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the structure.
9. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of City Codes, except that
screen walls may be built to a height as required by a City approved Noise
Study.
10. Parking:
Parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark Zoning
Code.
17.70.040.6 Very High Residential - 1 (VH -1)
Proposed Density: 7.0 - 10.0 du /ac.
This density designation of VH -1 is intended to permit development of a range of
residential units including single family detached homes, zero or z -lot line homes, sinJe-
family attached homes, and cluster housing. The Very High designation allows densities
of up to ten dwelling units per gross acre within Specific Plan Planning Units.
The standards of the City_ of Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apply except as provided
below.
A. Perm itted/Admini strati ve,Planned Development Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan. the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1
herein shall apply.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 22
B. Site Development Standards
Single Family Detached
1. Minimum lot area: 3,500 square feet.
2. Minimum lot width: 40 feet; as measured from the front setback line.
3. Minimum building setbacks:
a. Front: 10 feet when " L" shaped garage entry, 20 feet to the garage when
straight in, or 15 feet otherwise. (5' is permitted on private streets, if the
garage is equipped with an automatic garage door opener.) The setbacks
shall be varied so as to provide visual variety along the streetscape.
b. Side: 5 feet per side and 10 feet per side facing a public street.
c. Rear: 10 feet.
Single Family Attached
4. Minimum site area per dwelling unit: 3,000 square feet
5. Minimum lot widthNot applicable
6. Minimum building setbacks:
a. A minimum landscaped setback of 20 feet for anv arterial street shall be
maintained, and 15 feet from any collector.
b. On residential roads, loop or cul -de -sac streets, setbacks shall be
maintained as follows: 10 feet to the building, 20 feet to the garage (5 feet
is permitted on private streets, if the garage is equipped «ith an automatic
garage door opener.) The setbacks shall be varied so as to provide visual
variety along the streetscape.
c. A minimum separation of 6 feet between buildings on the same lot, except
that no detached dwelling units shall be closer than 10 feet to another
detached unit. The minimum setback from any interior lot line shall be 10
feet.
Single Family Detached /Attached
7. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and two feet into the required front
Ordinance No. 244
Page 23
SPECIFIC PLAN
HIDDEN CREEK RANCH
NATURAL AREA
(where lots abut open space)
P.L. _,�
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
FUEL MODIFICATION AREA -
100' FROM BUILDING SITE
SLOPEIAREA
10'(3)
MIN. REAR SETBACK
(3) - 15' for adjacent
two story residences
P.L.
RESDENCE
P.L. Q9
5'o n.)
® MIN. SIDE
® SETBACK
) - unless zero lot line:
(1 :
then 10' building separation
required
(2) - 10' facing public street
40' ► 20'
min. lot width ) _ MIN.
alternate
driveway FRONT SETBACK
configurat ri'.'' '
MIN. LOT AREA: 4,000 s.f. PROPERTY UNE
CURB
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN: HIGH DENSITY
Ordinance No. 244
Page 24
and rear vards. Such elements shall not be closer than tuo feet to a line mid-
way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
8. Maximum building height (as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of
structure):
Thirty five (35) feet (3 story).
Accessory Structures: Fifteen (15) feet.
9. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of City Codes, except that
screen walls maybe built to a height as required by a Cite approved Noise
Study.
10. Parking:
Parking shall comply with the City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
11. Landscape Coverage!Screening
a. Minimum landscape coverage: 20 percent of overall lot area.
b. Minimum parking lot landscaping: At least 10 percent of any parking lot
shall be landscaped, and such landscaping shall be considered as part of the
required twenty percent (20 %) overall lot landscaping.
c. Parking lots located adjacent to public streets shall be screened from view
through the use of a fence, wall, berm, or landscaped planting strip utilizing
shrubs and/or trees or anv combination thereof Such fence or wall shall
conform to the height requirements specified herein and by the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code.
17.70.040.7 Very High Residential - 2 (VH -2)
Proposed Density: 10.0 - 20.0 du /ac.
The VH -2 designation is intended to pemut development of a range of residential units
including single family attached homes and multi - family dwellings. The Community
Residential allows densities of up to 15 dwelling units per gross acre. Densities may
increased up to a density approved by the City Council for affordable housing.
The standards of the Citv of Moorpark's R -P -D Zone shall apple except as provided
below.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 25
A. Perm i tted/Admini strative."PI anned Development Permit%Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1
herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
Single Family Attached
1. Minimum site area per dwelling unit: 2,500 square feet
2. -Minimum lot widthNo minimum
Multi-Family Dwelling Units
3. Minimum site area per dwelling unit: 2,000 square feet
Single/Multi- Family Dwelling Linits
4. Minimum building setbacks:
a. A minimum landscaped setback of 24 feet for any arterial street shall be
maintained and 20 feet from any collector.
b. On residential roads, loops or cul -de -sac streets, setbacks shall be
maintained as follows: 10 feet to the building, 20 feet to the garage (5 feet
is permitted on private streets, ifthe garage is equipped «ith an automatic
garage door opener.) The setbacks shall be varied so as to provide visual
variety along the street edge.
c. A minimum separation of 6 feet between buildings on the same lot, except
that no detached dwelling units shall be closer than 10 feet to another
detached unit. The minimum setback from anv interior lot line shall be 10
feet.
5. Projections into required setbacks:
Cornices, canopies, chimneys, eaves or other similar architectural features may
extend two feet into the required side yards and two feet into the required front
and rear yards. Such elements shall not be closer than two feet to a line mid-
way between the exterior walls of buildings located on the same lot.
6. Maximum building height (as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of the
structure):
'_..W �—
Ordinance No. 244
Page 26
it
Cl
T
TYPICAL COURT - TECHNICAL SITE PLAN
Ordinance No. 244
Page 27
1 1 I I I 1 1 h N I t t t 1 1 I I I 1 i I iTl Nm'five r ( l N) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] 1 I I I I I I I I II it it II II II P I I PI 1' 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1111 i l 1111111
Accessory Structures: Fifteen (15) feet.
7. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City ofMoorpark
Zoning Code, except that screen walls may be built to a maximum height of
eight feet and sound attenuation wails to a height as required by a City
approved Noise Study.
8. Parking:
Parking shall comply with the City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
9. Landscape Coverage!Screening
a. Minimum landscape coverage: 20 percent of overall lot area.
b. Minimum parking lot landscaping: At least 10 percent of any parking lot shall
be landscaped, and such landscaping shall be considered as part of the
required twenty percent (20 %) overall lot landscaping.
e. Parking lots located adjacent to public streets shall be screened from view
through the use ofa fence, wall, berm, or landscaped planting strip utilizing
shrubs and/or trees or anv combination thereof. Such fence or wall shall
conform to the height requirements specified herein and by the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code.
17.70.050 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
17.70.050.1 GENERAL COMMERCLAL - COMMUNITY CENTER (GC -CC)
Within the Hidden Creek Specific Plan, a community center area has been incorporated into
the land use plan to encourage the development of an attractive, innovative. and efficient mixed
use center. The development standards accommodate a broad range ofretail, office, business,
educational, and community service uses. The community center site is tailored specifically to
the Hidden Creek Ranch and the needs of off-site areas as well.
The development standards of the Cit,' of Moorpark's C -P -D Zone shall apply except as
otherwise noted below in Table 17.70 -2.
A. Permitted/Administrative Planned Development Perm it/Conditiona I Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned
development, administrative. and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -2 herein
shall apply.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 28
PERMITTED LAND USES
Purpose: The purpose of this section is to list in matrix form the land uses permitted within each of the Land Use
Districts shown on the Land Use Plan. The City Zoning. Code should be referenced for uses not listed (Section
17.20.030) and for Exemptions from Zoning Clearances (Section 17.20.040).
Permitted uses in commercial and institutional zones.
Permitted uses in commercial and institutional zones are set out in Table 17.70 -2.
The key for Table 17.70 -2 is as follows:
[Blank] Not permitted
V Permitted by zone clearance
♦ Planning commission- approved planned development permit
❑ City council- approved planned development permit
0 Planning commission - approved conditional use permit
O City council- approved conditional use permit
Table 17.70 -2
PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ZONES
GC -CC PUBL/INST EQ
Amusement and recreational facilities
Amusement parks and carnivals
0
0
Arcades
0
Bicycle racing tracks, outdoor
0
Health club /gymnasium
Martial arts and dance studios
Art galleries, museums and botanical gardens
♦
0
Automobile service stations
Banks and related financial offices and institutions
Bars, taverns and nightclubs'
0
Benches, shade structures
Q
O
Care facilities: For 7 or more persons' (see also H &SC and W &IC)
DayZ3
Intermediate and residential
0
Car washes, self - service or automatic
0
Churches, synagogues and other buildings used for religious worships
♦
0
Clubhouses
♦
0
0
With alcoholic beverages
0
Q
Club projects, temporary outdoor
❑
❑
Communications facilities
0
0
Radio and television broadcasting stations
0
0
Community center
Conference center /convention center
0
Convenience stores
Dog and cat grooming
Drainage improvements, detention basins, desilting , debris basins, etc.
Q
Q
O
Drilling, temporary geologic (testing only)
0
0
0
Education and training
Colleges and universities
Schools: Elementary and secondary (nonboarding only)z3
Schools: Professional, vocational, art, craft and self - improvement
Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor
0
0
0
Government buildings, excluding correctional institutions
Police stations
Fire stations
June 25, 1998
C. {. #�,
Ordinance No. 244
Page 29
GC -CC
PUBL4NST
Grading'
V
o
Health services such as professional offices and outpatient clinics
♦
0
Ambulance services
0
0
Hospitals
0
0
Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only
Hotels, motels and boarding houses
Laboratories: research and scientific
Medical and dental
♦
0
Library and information center
Motion picture and TV production, related activities and structures
0
0
Temporary (maximum 47 days in any 180 -day period)`
0
0
Offices: business, professional, admin., except health and veterinary
Parking lots
Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground
0
0
Public utility facilities'
0
0
Offices only
♦
Recording studios and sound stages
0
Rental and leasing of durable goods
Bicycle rental
Repair and reconditioning services
0
Automobile body work and painting
0
Automobile repair, including component repair
0
Repair of personal goods such as jewelry, shoes and saddlery
Restaurants, cafes and cafeterias' temporary outside eating, fast food
Retail trade
Christmas tree sales'
Feed stores
0
Lumber and building materials sales yards
0
Mail order houses (nonstore)
Motor vehicle, mobilehome, recreational vehicle and boat dealers'
0
Nurseries
0
Uses and structures, accessory
SEE PRINCIPAL USE
Outdoor sales and services, temporary'
V
Repair of products retailed
v
Recreational sport and athletic facilities
Community centers (serving surrounding neighborhood)
Fields, athletic (to serve surrounding neighborhood)
Golf courses, except miniature golf!
Parks (to serve the neighborhood)
V
With buildings
Swimming/tennis facilities, basketball/volleyball courts,
tot lots, picnic tables/barbecue
Recreation projects, city- initiated
V
Riding stables
With accessory lodging facilities
With outdoor arenas/accessory structures
Service establishments
Business
Sign painting and lettering shops
Personal
Shade structures
♦
V
Signs (See Section 17.20.040 & Chapter 17.40, Moorpark Zoning Code)
V
V
Taxidermy
Trails, equestrian, hiking, biking trails, trailheads, viewing areas
V
V
June 25, 1998
EQ
V
9
0
0
MY
U
Ordinance No. 244
Page 30
GC -CC PUBLANST EQ
Underground transmission lines/access roads v v e
Uses and strictures, accessory SEE PRINCIPAL USE
Game machines: three or fewer v
Temporary buildings during construction' v v v
Vaccination clinics, temporary, for pet animals' v
Veterinary clinics, pet animals only' 0
Recreational vehicle storage 0
Storage of building materials, temporary' v v v
Waste treatment and disposal facilities
Recycling facilities and centers 0 0
Water production, storage and distribution facilities: Priv. purveyors',' 0 v
Zoological gardens, animal exhibits and commercial aquariums G
Notes for Table 17.70 -2:
1. - There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
2. If there is an existing planned development permit for the site, the school facility could be permitted by
approval of a modification to the existing permit.
3. For commercial zones, a school facility would only be permitted where sponsored by or permitted
within a commercial use on the same site.
4. See also Section 17.20.040 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
5. Churches located in existing buildings with an approved planned development permit will require a
modification to that permit.
6. Restaurants with temporary outside eating facilities shall receive a modification to the planned
development permit.
7. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations.
June 25, 1998
tf,� Fti d1 rt`w
Ordinance No. 244
Page 31
B. Site Development Standards
1. Landscape Coverage:
Minimum landscape coverage: 10 percent of the overall lot area; pursuant
to Chapter 17.32. 100 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
Other landscaping criteria for the commercial areas of the Hidden Creek
Ranch Specific Plan shall comply with this section of the Moorpark Zoning
Code.
2. Setbacks:
a. From arterials: 20 feet front and 20 feet side
b. From collectors: 15 feet front and 10 feet side
c. All other streets: 10 feet
d. Adjacent to residential zones: 15 feet
Said setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front -to-
back driveways, and shall not be used for parking area aisles or parking.
3. Structure height
Maximum height (as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of structure):
3 5 feet; or 60 feet with Planning Commission PDP approval pursuant to
Moorpark Zoning Code, Section 17.24.020, Table 17.24.020B
4. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code, except that screen walls maybe built to a height
as may be required by a City approved Noise Study.
5. Off - street parking:
Off - street parking shall comply with Chapter 1732 of the Moorpark
Zoning Code, except as modified herein:
a. Community Center: 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area;
b. Restaurants: including fastfood restaurants: 1 space per 100 square
feet of gross floor area.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 32
4. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code, except that screen walls may be built to a height as may be required
by a City approved Noise Study.
5. Off - street parking:
Off - street parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark Zoning
Code.
17.70.070 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE REGULATIONS
It is the intent ofthis section to provide guidelines to encourage the appropriate use of the parks
and open space areas within Hidden Creek Ranch. The regulations contained herein are
intended to promote active and passive activities which accommodate access and use, while still
enhancing the natural value of the open space areas.
17.70.070.1 Equestrian Center
A. Permitted /Admini5trative/Planned DeveloDment Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of pemutted uses, planned development,
administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -2 herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Setbacks:
a. From arterials: 15 feet, front: 10 feet, side.
b. From collectors, residential and loop streets: 10 feet.
c. Adjacent to residential zones: 15 feet
Said setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front -to -back
driveways, and shall not be used for parking area aisles or parking.
2. Structure height
Maximum height (as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of structure):
35 feet, or 45 feet with Planning Commission PDP approval.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 33
6. Lighting:
Exterior lighting forall commercial parking areas shall consist ofdecorative
low - profile lighting fixtures not to exceed a height of twenty (20') feet.
However, those parkingareas which abut residential PlanningUnits shall
not exceed a height of eighteen (18') feet in height. The design and
location of fixtures shall be in such a manner to prevent any illumination of
adjoining properties or streets which might be considered either
objectionable by adjacent property owners or hazardous to motorists.
The use of lower freestanding fixtures and bollard type lighting may be
used in pedestrian walkways, stairways and ramps located in outside
common areas. Freestanding light fixtures shall not be located on any
landscape finger directly adjacent to the side of a parking stall, and shall
be set back a minimum of three feet (3) from curb face, subject to grading
and site plan review by the City.
7. Loading:
All loading shall be performed on the individual commercial site. Unless
otherwise specified in an individual project's conditions, loading area(s)
shall be provided adjacent to any proposed buildings. The loadingVservice
area(s) shall be screened from public view by walls and landscaping unless
obscured by a building or slope area. The location and design shall be
subject to the review of the city, and shall otherwise comply with the
provisions contained in Section 17.32.090 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
8. Trash and storage areas:
All storage, including cartons, containers or trash, shall be shielded from
view by containment within a building or in an area enclosed by a wall.
9. Screening:
Screening shall be installed and maintained subject to the following:
a. All building mechanical equipment shall be screened from view.
b. An opaque screen shall be installed along all exterior
boundaries, other than streets, where the commercial parcel
abuts areas deswmated for residential use. Said screen shall
consist of a solid wood or masonry wall or fence, earthen berm;
or dense evergreen plant material, or a combination thereof, and
have a total height of not less than 6 feet.
c. Screening for commercial uses within the Specific Plan shall be
in compliance with Section 17.24.090.D (Sight Triangle) and
C.. .�
Ordinance No. 244
Page 34
Section 17.24.090.E (Sight Distance) ofthe Moorpark -Zoning
Code.
17.70.060 PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES
17.70.060.1 GENERAL STANDARDS AND USES
The purpose ofthese regulations is to allow for avariety of public and institutional uses including
storm water drainage, domestic and reclaimed water faci I ities, wastewater facilities, and other
related public infrastructure. Adjacent to Moorpark College, educational and college related
use are allowed.
A. Permitted /Administrative/Planned Development Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned development,
administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -2 herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Landscape Coverage:
Minimum landscape coverage: 10 percent of the overall lot area; pursuant to
Section 17.32. 100 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
Other landscaping criteria for the commercial areas of the Hidden Creek Ranch
Specific Plan shall comply with this section of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
2. Setbacks:
a. From arterials: 15 feet, front; 10 feet, side.
b. From collectors, residential and loop streets: 10 feet.
c. Adjacent to residential zones: 15 feet
Said setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front to -back
driveways, and shall not be used for parking area aisles or parking.
3. Structure height
Maximum height (as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of structure):
35 feet; or 45 feet with Planning Commission PDP approval pursuant to Moorpark
Zoning Code, Section 17.24.020, Table 17.24.020B.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 35
3. Fences and walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code, except that screen walls may be built to a height as may be required
by a City approved Noise Study.
4. Off - street parking:
Off - street parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark Zoning
Code.
17.70.070.2 Golf Course
The purpose of this zone is to accommodate golf courses and related uses within the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan.
A. Permitted/Administrative!Planned Development Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned development,
administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1 herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Setbacks:
a. From arterials: 15 feet, front. 10 feet, side.
b. From collectors, residential and loop streets: 10 feet.
c. Adjacent to residential zones: 15 feet.
Said setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front -to -back
driveways and shall not be used for parking area aisles or parking.
2. Structure Height:
Maximum Height(as averaged from adjacent grade to the top of structure):
35 feet; or 45 feet with a Planning Commission PDP approval.
3. Fences and Walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code, except that screen walls may be built to a height required by a City
approved Noise Study.
ar v v ''�✓
Ordinance No. 244
Page 36
4. Off - street Parking:
Off -street parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code.
17.70.070.3 Open Space
It is the intent of this zone to promote the preservation of the natural landforms of the
Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan area This will enhance the character of Hidden Creek
Ranch while providing for passive recreational opportunities.
A. Permitted/ A dministrative/Planned Development Permit/Conditional Uses
For the purposes of this Specific Plan, the list of permitted uses, planned development,
administrative, and conditional uses as defined in Table 17.70 -1 herein shall apply.
B. Site Development Standards
1. Setbacks:
a. From arterials: 15 feet, front; 10 feet, side.
b. From collectors, residential and loop streets: 10 feet.
c. Adjacent to residential zones: 15 feet.
Said setbacks shall be landscaped, except for walkways and front -to -back
driveways and shall not be used for parking area aisles or parking.
2. Fences and Walls:
All fences and walls shall comply with the provisions of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code, except that screen walls may be built to a height required by a City
approved Noise Study.
3. Off - street Parking:
Off - street parking shall comply with Chapter 17.32 of the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code.
17.70.080 SIGN REGULATIONS
The purpose of this section is to set standards to ensure the development of guidelines for the
future use of signs which are compatible with the community character of Hidden Creek Ranch.
Signage is an important element within a community and provides a sense of identity and
cohesiveness through the use of consistent visual linkages. These sign regulations VAII ensure the
Ordinance No. 244
Page 37
signage consists of materials, forms, colors, and type styles which complement architectural and
landscape features in the community.
The signage program will be designed to effectively direct persons to various locations and
activities throughout the community, reducingpotential traffic and safety hazards to motorists and
pedestrians.
The provisions of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code, Chapter 17.40, Sign Requirements shall
apply, except as modified herein.
17.70.080.1 Definitions
Forthe purposes ofthis Specific Plan, the definition section contained in Chapter 17.40,
Sign Definitions of the Moorpark Zoning Code, shall apply.
17.70.080.2 Permitted Signs
Signs are permitted, subject to city approval of a sign permit, as follows:
A. Permanent Si
1. Major Community Entry Signs
Large -scale monumentation signage identifying major entries to the Hidden Creek
Ranch community will be located at the two main entrances, one on the western
end and one on the southeastern entry. Signage may be permitted on both sides
of each entry.
Community entry signage may be provided as an element of a screen wall, in which
case, such wall shall not exceed a vertical height of 4 feet from grade, nor a total
area of 30 square feet. Such sign may be provided as a freestanding monument
or as a part of a screen wall.
2. Residential Neighborhood Entry Signs
Twomonumentsignsprovidmgidentificabonofentryinto individual neighborhoods
or project areas may be located at each individual project entrance.
Such signage shall not exceed a vertical height of 4 feet from grade, or a total area
of 30 square feet and may be provided as part of a screen wall or as a freestanding
monument sign.
3. Model Tract Pole Signs
Ordinance No. 244
Page 38
Model tract pole signs shall be permitted perthe City ofMoorpark Zoning Code.
4. For Rent, For Lease and For Exchange Signs in Residential Zones
For rent, for lease, and for exchange signs shall be permitted in the multi - family
residential zones per the City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
5. Commercial Identification Signs
Community Center:
One entry sign at each entrance to the Community Center site.
If provided as an element of a wall, such signage shall not exceed a vertical height
of 4 feet from grade, nor a total area of 30 square feet. Such signage may be
provided as a freestanding monument or as part of a screen wall.
B. Tempgrary Signs
1. Temporary signs denoting the architect, engineer, contractor, and/or lender may
be placed on the premises where construction is in progress. Such signs shall not
exceed a height of 4 feet, nor a total of 36 square feet.
2. Temporary Directional Signage
Temporary directional signs advertising homes for sale in the current phase shall
conform with the Section 17.40.120 of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code,
3. Future Development Signs
Temporary signs denoting future development of sites, (using general terms for
residential or commercial development in the description of the future land use on
the site upon which the sign is to be located) shall not exceed a vertical height of
4 feet, and a horizontal length of 6 feet, nor a total area of 24 square feet. Signs
shall be consistent in size. color, material, and design as approved by the City of
Moorpark and shall provide an identifiable element to the community.
C. General Requirements
1. No free - standing sign or structure shall be permitted closer than five feet to any
ultimate street rieht- of -wav line.
2. Other general sign requirements and characteristics shall be governed by those
provisions contained in Chapter 17.40 of the Moorpark Zoning Code.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 39
C10 u. 7 0#.
A master sign program for a planning unit or community or village center may be
submittedto the Department ofCommunity Development for review and approval as
apart ofthe Planned Development Permit process. Should a master sign program be
submitted and approved, the approved sign program shall constitute the sign
requirements for that planning unit or center. The sign requirements of master sign
program will then supersede the provisions of this chapter and Chapter 17.40 of the
Moorpark Zoning Code.
17.70.090 PARKING REGULATIONS
For the purposes ofthis Specific Plan, required off-street parking for residential, commercial,
institutional, and recreational uses shall comply with the provisions contained in Chapter 17.32
of the Moorpark Zoning Code, unless otherwise noted in this document.
Parking requirements for uses that may occur in the Specific Plan that are not specifically listed
in the Parking Code shall be provided in the quantities specified by the Director of Community
Development, based on the requirements for the most comparable use specified therein.
Joint -use or Shared Parking - within commercial developments where two land uses have
parking demands with different peak use characteristics (i.e. office versus retail etc.), reduction
in the aggregate total of otherwise required parking spaces for individual permitted uses shall
be permitted up to 20 percent (for either joint -use or shared parking) upon approval of detailed
parking plan. This plan shall be prepared by a qualified traffic engineer, be acted upon in
conjunction with a Planned Development Permit and/or Conditional Use Permit and may cover
two or more land uses.
17.70.100 HISTORIC, NATIVE OAK AND MATURE TREES
The Hidden Creek Ranch Specific Plan has been designed to preserve the most important
landforms and more sensitive areas that contain these historic, native oak and other mature
trees. These areas, the arroyos and northern open space preserve, will not contain residential
development, thereby preserving as many trees as possible. These areas will contain several
storm water detention and desilting facilities, and necessary public infrastructure, and every
effort will be made to place these facilities with minimum impact to existing trees and other
sensitive vegetation areas. In addition, a large stand of trees in the eastern portion of the
residential development area has been preserved as an open space area.
The far eastern portion of the Ranch has been designated as a separate; distinct open space
area which may in the fixture contain a golf course. If any development is proposed in the east
mesa area, further analysis ofhe impacts to biological and archaeological resources, pnorto
.n �-y OD
Ordinance No. 244
Page 40
development, will be required. Historic, native oak, and mature trees within the Hidden Creek
Ranch will be preserved, wherever possible, on the east mesa.
The removal of historic, native oak and mature trees shall be subject to the provisions of the
City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Chapter 12.12 and the mitigation measures included in the
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which identify avoidance and replacement
requirements.
17.70.110 OUTDOOR LIGHTING CONTROL
The purpose of this section is to provide standards for outdoor lighting so that its use does not
unreasonably interfere with astronomical observations. It is the intent of this section to
encourage, through the regulation of the types, kinds, construction, installation, and uses of
outdoor electrically powered illuminating devices, lighting practices and systems to conserve
energywithoutdecreasingsafety, utility, security, and productivity while enhancingnighttime
enjoyment of property within the jurisdiction.
All outdoor electrically powered illuminating devices shall be installed in conformance with the
provisions of these development regulations, the City of Moorpark Building Code, as
applicable and under appropriate permit and inspection.
17.70.110.1 Definitions
As used in this Specific Plan section, unless the context clearly indicates, certain words
and phrases used in this chapter shall mean the following:
A. Installed - means the attachment, or assembly fixed in place, whether or not
connected to a power source, or any outdoor light fixture.
B. Outdoor light fixture -means outdoor electrically powered illuminating devices,
outdoor lighting or reflective surfaces, lamps and similar devices, permanently
installed or portable, used for illumination or advertisement. Such devices shall
include, but are not limited to search, spot, and flood lights for:
1. Buildings and structures;
2. Recreational areas;
3. Parking lot lighting;
4. Landscape lighting;
5. Signs (advertising or other);
6. Street lighting;
7. Product display area lighting;
8. Building overhangs and open canopies.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 41
17.70.110.2 Shielding
All nonexempt outdoor lighting fixtures shall have shielding as required by Table A. of
this section.
TABLE A
SHIELDING REQUIREMENTS
Fixture Lamp Type
Shielded
Low Pressure Sodium'
Partially
High Pressure Sodium
Prohibited except frilly shielded on arterial
streets and collector streets of 100 feet or more in
right -of -way width.
Metal Halide
Prohibited Z
Flourescent
Fully 3
Quartz'
Fully
Incandescent 160 watts
Fully
Incandescent 160 watts
None
Any light source 50 watts or less
None
Glass tubes filled with neon, argon, krypton
None
Other Source
As approved by the City of Moorpark Building
Official
Notes.
This is the preferred light source to minimize undesirable light
emission into the night sky affecting astronomical observation
Fully shielded fixtures are preferred but not required.
Fully shielded and installed metal halide fixtures shall be allowed
for applications where the designing engineer deems that color
rendering is critical. Metal halide lighting, used primarily for
display purposes, shall not be used for security lighting after I I:00
p.m. or after closing hours if before 11:00 p.m. Metal halide lamps
shall be installed only in enclosed luminaries.
Outdoor advertising signs of the type constructed of translucent
materials and wholly illuminated from within do not require
shielding. Dark backgrounds with light lettering or symbols are
preferred, to minimize detrimental effects Unless conforming to the
above dark background preference, total lamp wattage per propem
shall be less than 41 watts.
For the purpose of these regulations, quartz lamps shall not be
considered an incandescent lamp.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 42
A. Fully shielded - means outdoor light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light
rays are emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as
certified by a photometric test report.
B. Partially shielded - means outdoor light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no
more than ten percent of the light rays are emitted by the installed fixture at angles
above the horizontal plane as certified by a photometric test report.
17.70.110.3 Filtration
Metal halide fixture lamp types shall be filtered. "Filtered" means any outdoor light
fixture which has a glass, acrylic, or translucent enclosure of the light source (quartz glass
does not meet this requirement).
17.70.110.4 Outdoor Advertising Signs
A. Top Mounted Fixtures Required
Lighting fixtures used to illuminate an outdoor advertising sign shall be mounted on
the top of the sign structure. All such fixtures shall comply with the shielding
requirements of Section 5.12.2 and the time controls of minor Section 9.5.
B. Prohibitions
Electrical illumination of outdoor advertising off -site signs is prohibited between the
hours of 11:00 p.m. and sunrise is prohibited.
17.70.110.5 Submission of Plans and Evidence of Ordinance Compliance -Tract Maps
A. Submission Contents
The applicant for any permit required for any provision of any law or code
applicable to Hidden Creek Ranch in connection with proposed work involving
outdoor lighting fixtures shall submit (as part of the application for permit) evidence
that the proposed work will comply with this Ordinance. The submission shall
contain but shall not necessarily be limited to the following, all or part of which may
be part or in addition to the information required else«-here in the laws of this
jurisdiction upon application for the required permit.
1. Plans Indicating the location ofthe premises. and the type of illuminating services,
fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors, and other devices;
Ordinance No. 244
Page 43
2. Description of the illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors, and
other devices and the description may include, but is not 1 imited to catalog cuts
by manufacturers and drawings ( including sections where required);
Photometric data, such as that furnished by manufacturers: or similar showing the
angle of cut off or light emissions.
B. Additional Submission
The above required plans, descriptions and data shall be sufficiently complete to
enable the City to readily detenn ne whether compliance with the requirements of this
Ordinance will be secured. If such plans, descriptions, and data cannot enable this
determination, by reason of the nature or configuration of the devices, fixtures, or
lamps proposed, the applicant shall additionally submit as evidence of compliance
to enable such determination such as certification reports of tests, provided that these
tests have been performed and certified by a recognized testing laboratory.
C. Tract Map Approval
Ifany tract map is proposed to have installed street or other common or public area
outdoor lighting, the final map shall contain a statement certiffiing that the applicable
provisions of the this ordinance will be adhered to.
D. Lamp or Fixture Substitution
Should any outdoor light fixture of the type of light source therein be changed after
the permit has been issued, and change request must be submitted to the Community
Development Director for approval, together with adequate information, which must
be received prior to submission, to assure compliance with this ordinance.
17.70.110.6 Special Uses
A. Recreational Facilities
Any light source permitted by this ordinance may be used for lighting of outdoor
recreational facilities (public or private), such as, but not limited to, football fields,
soccer fields, baseball fields, softball fields, tennis courts. or equestrian centers,
provided all of the following conditions are met:
1. Lighting for parking lots and other areas surrounding the playing field, court, or
track shall comply with the ordinance for lighting in the specific plan area.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 44
2. All fixtures used for event lighting shall be fully shielded as defined in section
5.12.2, or be designed or provided with sharp cut -off capability, so as to
minimize up- light, spill - light, and glare.
3. All events shall be scheduled so as to complete all activity before off as near to
10:30 p.m. as practical, but under no circumstances shall any illumination of the
playing field, court or track be permitted after 11:00 p.m., except to conclude
a scheduled event that was in progress before 11:00 p.m. and circumstances
prevented concluding before 11:00 p.m.
B. Outdoor Display Lots - Any light source permitted by this ordinance maybe used
for lighting of outdoor display lots, such as building material sales, provided all of the
following conditions are met:
1. Lighting for parking lots and other surrounding the display lot shall comply with
this ordinance in he specific plan area.
2. All fixtures used for display lighting shall be fully shielded as defined in section
5.12.2 of this ordinance, or be designed or provided with sharp cut -off
capability, so as to minimize up- light, spill - light, or glare.
3. Display lot lighting shall be turned off within thirty (30) minutes after closing of
the business. Under no circumstances shall the fill illumination of the lot be
permitted after 1 I :00 p.m. Any lighting used after 11:00 p.m. shall be used as
security lighting.
17.70.110.7 Temporary Exemptions
A. Request: Renewal. Information Required
Any person may submit a w itten request, on a form prepared by the j urisdiction, to
the Community Development Director, for a temporary exemption request. A
temporary exemption shall contain the following information:
1. Specific exemption or exemptions requested;
2. Type and use of outdoor lighting fixture involved;
3. Duration of time requested exemption;
4. Type of lamp and calculated lumens;
5. Total wattage of lamp or lamps,
6. Proposed location on premises of the outdoor light fixture(s);
7. Previous temporary exemptions, if any, and addresses of premises thereunder;
8. Physical size of outdoor light fixture(s) and type of shielding provided;
9. Such other data and information as may be required by the building official.
Y - r T. ,-1, V 7 (j...
tar — a. . D
Ordinance No. 244
Page 45
B. Approval_ Duration
The Community Development Director shall have five business days from the date
of submission of the request for the temporary exemption to act, in writing, on the
request If approved, the exemption shall be valid for not more than thirty days form
the date of the approval. The approval shall be renewable at the discretion of the
community Development Director upon a consideration of all of the circumstances.
Each renewed exemption shall be valid for not more than thirty days.
C. Disapproval: _A
If the request for temporary exemption is disapproved, the person making the
request will have the appeal rights provided in Section 13.
17.70.110.8 Nonconformance
A. Fossil Fuel Light
All outdoor light fixtures producing light directly by the combustion of natural gas or
other fossil fuels are exempt from all requirements of this Ordinance.
B. State and Federal Facilities
Outdoor lighting fixtures installed on, and in connection with those facilities and land
owned or operated by the federal government, or the state of California, or any
department, division, agency or instrumentally thereof, are exempt from all
requirements of this Ordinance. Voluntary compliance with the intent of this
Ordinance at those facilities is encouraged.
17.70.110.9 Appeals
Any person substantially aggrieved by any decision of the Community Development
Director made in the administration of these sign regulations has the right and
responsibilities of appeal to the Moorpark City Council, as provided for in Title 17 of
the Municipal Code.
17.70.110.10 Law Governing Conflicts
Where any provision of federal, state, county, or city statutes, codes or laws conflict with
any provision of this ordinance, the most restrictive shall govern unless otherwise
regulated by law.
Ordinance No. 244
Page 46
AMENDMENT TO CITY OF MOORPARK
ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
ATTACB SENT B
Ordinance No. 244
Page 47
AMENDMENT TO CITY OF NIOORPARK
ZONING MAP RELATED TO THE HIDDEN CREEK RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN
J
NORTH PROPOSED CITY LIMITS
.� SPECIFIC PLAN 8 /SPECIFIC PLAN 93 -1
S
`---� SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING
ATTACHMENT B
Ordinance No. 244
Page 48
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK 1
I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing Ordinance No. 244 was adopted by the City Council of the City
of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 19th day of August, 1998, and that the same was adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Perez, and Wozniak
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Teasley
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 21st day of September, 1998.
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, i y Clerk
(seal)
K" ..
ITEM 9.D.
G
pf
Lo- lie
ACT
MOORPARK CITY COUNCI T-La4ta1 ►�'- : -Zs53
AGENDA REPORT B
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Service
DATE: June 13, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/19/02)
SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF
MOORPARK LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE AND ESTABLISHING A
PUBLIC HEARING DATE
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to adopt Ordinance No. ,
which amends the Moorpark Municipal Code, Chapter 3.36, Library
Facilities Fee, by amending the definition of the term "library
facilities ". If approved, the amended definition of "library
facilities" would add to the definition the ability to use the
Library Facilities Fee funds for financing, obtaining or
constructing public library facilities to serve increased demand
for library services created by new development. Specifically,
the funds would now be able to be used to acquire, construct,
remodel, landscape, light, and /or furnish public library
facilities. Therefore, adoption of Ordinance No. would
allow for expanded use of the Library Facilities Fees; it would
not increase or change the amount of the Fee.
BACKGROUND
On October 1, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 238,
establishing a Library Facilities Fee imposed on all new
development, including both residential and
commercial /industrial development. The Ordinance requires new
development to pay a Library Facilities Fee to be used for
"library facilities" that would mitigate impacts on existing
library services that can reasonably be attributed to the new
development.
Honorable City Council
June 13, 2002
Page 2
Ordinance No. 238 defined "library facilities" as "library
collection materials including books, video and audio materials,
periodicals CD rom disks, and other related materials which are
available in, or for loan from, Moorpark Library and computers
for public access, and designated for use by library patrons."
Facility acquisitions, improvements or expansions are not
included in the definition.
DISCUSSION
Currently, the Moorpark Library is approximately 7,000 square
feet in size. Based on accepted standards, a library serving a
population the size of Moorpark (approximately 31,000) should
consist of approximately 26,400 square feet. At build -out
(approximate population of 42,000), the Moorpark Library should
consist of approximately 35,700 square feet. To help address the
need for a larger library, potential funding sources need to be
identified.
Expanding the Library Facilities Fee definition of "library
facilities" to include facility acquisitions, improvements or
expansions would allow the City to use some of the Library
Facilities fees to fund additional library space. This would
also make the Library Facilities Fee code section consistent
with the City's other two facilities fees code sections (police
and fire) . Passage of this Ordinance does not alter the current
fee schedule or total fees paid by new development, which are:
• Single Family Dwelling $460.56/DU
• Multi Family Dwelling $298.46/DU
• Mobile Home $306.03/DU
• Commercial $ .10 /sf
• Industrial $ .10 /sf
Expanding the definition of "library facilities" would create a
temporary situation where the City would be required to maintain
two separate Library Facility Fee Funds. Since development fees
can only be used for the purpose identified when collected,
those Library Facility Fees that are collected prior to the
implementation of the expanded definition can only be used for
the originally identified purposes; they may not be used to fund
costs included in the new definition. Therefore, the Fees must
be segregated so that expenditures can be tracked and verified
as appropriate.
Honorable City Council
June 13, 2002
Page 3
To date, the City has received $155,000 in Library Facilities
Fees. This is the amount of fees that may only be used for the
purposes identified in the original definition. By the City's
build -out, it is anticipated that the City will have received a
total of $2.8 million. Using this estimate, approximately
$2,645,000 will be available to be used for expenditures under
the new definition.
This fee falls under the regulation of Government Code sections
66000- 66025. Accordingly, the fee can only be established after
meeting certain disclosure and timeline requirements. The
attached "Proposed Library Facilities Fee Amendment Information
Sheet" provides all the information required for disclosure by
the Government Code. This information must be provided to the
public at least 10 days in advance of the meeting in which the
fee will be considered. Additionally, the establishment of this
fee can only occur after a public hearing is held and the fee
will be effective no sooner than 30 days after adoption of the
Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Introduce for first reading Ordinance No. , amending the
Moorpark Municipal Code Section 3.36.200 (Library Facilities
Fee - Definitions) to amend the definition of "Library
Facilities ".
2. Direct staff to provide the required notices, and to
advertise a public hearing on July 17, 2002, to receive
testimony and conduct a second reading for adoption of
Ordinance No.
Attachments: #1 - Proposed Library Facilities Fee Amendment
Information Sheet
#2 - Ordinance No.
Proposed Library Facilities Fee Amendment
Information Sheet
Purpose of Fee: In addition to the current purpose of the Fee,
this amendment would allow for funds collected from appropriate
sources to be used for the purpose of financing, obtaining or
constructing public library facilities to serve increased demand
for library services created by new development.
Use of the Funds: Amendment would allow all funds generated by
imposition of this fee, including any interest earned on these
funds, to be used for the additional purpose of financing of
public facilities. Specifically, the funds will now be
additionally used to acquire, construct, remodel, landscape,
light, and /or furnish public library facilities serving
Moorpark. Previously, these funds could only be used for
library collection materials including books, video and audio
materials, periodicals CD rom disks, and other related materials
which are available in, or for loan from, Moorpark Library, and
for computers for public access and designated for use by
library patrons.
Relationship between Use of Fee /Need for Public Library
Facilities Serving Moorpark: This fee will be imposed on all new
uses and for enlargements of existing uses in Moorpark.
Currently, the Moorpark Library is approximately 7,000 square
feet in size. Based on accepted standards, a library serving a
population the size of Moorpark (approximately 31,000) should
consist of approximately 26,400 square feet. At build -out
(approximate population of 42,000), the Moorpark Library should
consist of approximately 35,700 square feet. To help address the
need for a larger library, expansion of the definition of
"library facilities" to include facility acquisitions,
improvements or expansions is necessary to allow use of the
Library Facilities Fees to fund additional library space.
Reasonableness of Fee: The amended Ordinance requires new
development to mitigate impacts on existing library services
that can reasonably be attributed to the new development.
Passage of this Ordinance does not alter the fee schedule or
total fees paid by new development. It would also make the
Library Facilities Fee code section consistent with the City's
other two facilities fees code sections (police and fire).
Cost of the Project and Funds Generated by this Fee: Fees
collected will be used to fund appropriate, actual costs of
facility acquisitions, improvements or expansions, including,
but not limited to acquisition, construction, remodeling,
landscaping, lighting, and /or furnishing public library
facilities serving Moorpark. To date, the City has received
$155,000 in Library Facilities Fees. This is the amount of fees
that may only be used for the purposes identified in the
original definition. By the City's build -out, it is anticipated
that the City will have received a total of $2.8 million. Using
this estimate, approximately $2,645,000 will be available to be
used for expenditures under the amended definition.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL
CODE BY REVISING CHAPTER 3.36, ARTICLE III, SECTION
200, RELATIVE TO THE DEFINITION OF LIBRARY FACILITIES
WHEREAS, new construction within the City creates a need
for additional, enlarged or new library space.
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark has authority to provide
library facilities within its jurisdiction, and has previously
imposed a Library Facilities Fee on new construction.
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the City to ensure that
it has sufficient funds to pay for needed new or enlarged
library facilities.
WHEREAS, the definition of "Library facilities" in the
current Library Facilities Fee Ordinance does not include
library capital improvements as an approved use of Library
Facilities Fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Moorpark Municipal Code is amended
by revising Section 3.36.200, Definitions, "Library facilities"
to read as follows:
"Library facilities" means library collection materials
including books, video and audio materials, periodicals, CD rom
disks, and other related materials which are available in, or
for loan from, Moorpark library; computers for public access,
and designed for use by library patrons; and library capital
improvements, including financing, acquiring, constructing
remodeling, landscaping, lighting, and or furnishing such public
library facilities.
SECTION 2. That if any section, subsection, sentence,
clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and
each section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase, part or
portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or
portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective thirty
(30) days after its passage and adoption.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter this Ordinance into
the book of original Ordinances of the City of Moorpark; shall
make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records
of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is
passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after
passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published
once in the Moorpark Star, a weekly newspaper of general
circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code,
for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for
that purpose.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of July 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk
ICa,. f -, €,
•1.4 %,
ITEM I
`t:
rile, e-jej
Qyl
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL u"
_
AGENDA REPORT T a': �� a _�1r1e= iC Cc 04-
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider City Co- Sponsorship of the Moorpark Rotary
Club's Civil War Reenactment
DISCUSSION:
The City is being asked to consider co- sponsorship of Rotary's
planned fundraising event. The event is a Civil War
reenactment. The primary purpose for the requested sponsorship
is to have the City assist in publicizing the event by allowing
use of the City marquee signs and the City quarterly newsletter.
The Rotary Club's purpose is to raise funds for use in the
Community, as do many other Moorpark based community service
organizations, which is a long- standing benefit to the
community. City participation is not necessary for them to
continue this outstanding and long- standing purpose.
Co- sponsorship by the City introduces potential liability. Staff
has researched special event insurance and found that coverage
specifically excludes pyrotechnics and firearms including
cannons. The City's insurance authority has recommended against
City co- sponsorship of this event. If this event is co-
sponsored, it would open the issue of sponsorship of events for
other non - profit groups for similar purposes.
The City Attorney has stated that allowing use of the City
marquee signs for a non -City sponsored event opens the forum for
others, so this appears to be a Catch 22 in that if City
sponsors the event it introduces potential liability, but if it
City Council Agenda Report
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 2
allows use of the marquee sign without sponsorship, it opens up
use of the signs to others.
Since it appears that the primary goal is to assist with
publicizing the event, while allowing similar treatment to other
local non - profit community service groups, it's recommended that
the City not co- sponsor the event but consider the following
options:
1. Use of one of the four pages in City Quarterly
Newsletter /Recreation Brochure as a community calendar on a
trial basis for the Fall brochure (expected publication
date is late August) for Moorpark based non - profit groups.
2. Consider allowing the Moorpark Rotary Club to place a
limited number of signs for their event in a manner similar
to boutique and garage /yard sale and temporary real estate -
open house signs as a trial pending a proposed modification
to the Sign Code that would permit such temporary signs.
3. Consider allowing Rotary to use marquee signs on a trial
basis for this event while staff evaluates the legal and
practical implications (administration, costs, etc.) of
such use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Decline Co- Sponsorship.
2. Authorize 'staff to implement Options 1 and 2 in agenda
report.
ITEM 10', 8 •
!A
AC ; T
tr I
'� i�41G1[�GiGi�
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE: May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and
Objectives for Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Attached are the proposed Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals
and Objectives for FY 2002/2003. It shows the proposed changes
from FY 2001/2002 in legislative format. As part of the
approval last year, the City Council also designated the "Top
Ten (10) Priorities."
It is generally acknowledged that with current staff levels,
there are many more objectives listed than can be reasonably
expected to be accomplished in the year. In fact, many of the
objectives will take several years to fully complete. A written
status report on the various priorities and objectives is not
included as part of this report. The City Council Monthly
Report provides a status on most of these items as well as other
staff work efforts. Staff will respond to specific Council
questions when this matter is considered.
In prior years, the proposed objectives were submitted to the
City Council as part of the annual budget process and usually
reviewed informally as part of the budget deliberations. Formal
consideration of the objectives usually followed adoption of the
budget.
As part of the review of last year's objectives, the Council
concurred to consider the FY 2002/2003 objectives prior to
preparation of the budget with the purpose of having more
correlation between the Council approved objectives and City
Manager proposed budget.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 2
To this end, the Council received a status report in February
2002. No direction was given to staff at that time. The City
Council subsequently met in separate, joint meetings with the
Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission and
discussed the City's priorities. Some of those discussions are
included in the proposed priorities, goals, and objectives.
The report to the Council for the February 6, 2002 meeting
included a list of 36 other potential objectives. Of these,
four have been implemented or included on the list of proposed
objectives, as follows:
• Expand subsidized taxi service to include low income
Moorpark Senior Citizens
• GIS
• Work with Ventura County Flood Control District on plans
for Arroyo Simi improvements in Moorpark
• Evaluate use alternatives for parcel deeded to City by SDI
in Virginia Colony.
The remaining 32 items and 6 additional items (Nos. 33 -38) are
as follows:
1. Conduct a community -wide survey to measure the level of
satisfaction residents feel about City services, develop a
program to regularly solicit public input and feedback
regarding service satisfaction, and continue to implement a
system to track customer requests and complaints.
2. Tape a minimum of two (2) special City- sponsored events or
meetings for replay supporting public information and
community promotion efforts and evaluate the feasibility of
taping a video about Moorpark City government.
3. Design and construct electrical system for decorative
lighting on High Street, utilizing recently constructed
underground conduit system.
4. Implement Neighborhood Preservation Program.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 3
5. Propose legislation to allow cities and counties more
discretion in establishing speed limits that are
enforceable by Radar.
6. Conduct an Organization and Management Study and prepare an
implementation plan.
7. Analyze potential for franchising of telephone services
providers that provide cable television services.
8. Taping monthly announcements of upcoming city- sponsored
activities for replay on the City Government Channel.
9. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a teen center.
10. Apply for "Tree City U.S.A." designation after adoption of
Amended Tree Ordinance.
11. Evaluate feasibility of lighting additional parks and
recreation facilities including Arroyo Vista Community Park
(AVCP) multi - purpose court and second softball field, two
basketball courts at Mountain Meadows Park, and proposed
skatepark.
12. Develop inventory of natural open space properties owned by
City and HOA's and other privately owned property
restricted by conservation easement or other development
condition or limitation.
13. Install winter holiday decorations on street light poles at
various locations in the City.
14. Adopt formal traffic policies.
15. Install a compressed natural gas (CNG) pumping station for
City and public use in Moorpark.
16. Conduct an Arbor Day event.
17. Expand Poindexter Park.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 4
18. Utility undergrounding projects.
19. Canine park.
20. Youth scholarship program for City recreation classes.
21. Specific Plan for area west of Virginia Colony on south
side of Los Angeles Avenue.
22. Rental Inspection Ordinance.
23. Expand Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and gym.
24. Work with property owner to improve west City entry.
25. Develop plan for recreational use of detention basin in
Specific Plan No. 1.
26. Electronic message sign.
27. Install traffic signal at eastbound SR 118 Collins
Drive /Los Angeles Avenue off ramp.
28. Work with Historical Society on finalizing a site for its
proposed facility.
29. Develop policies for Arts in Public Places expenditures.
30. Develop guidelines for fine and cultural arts expenditures.
31. Install Tierra Rejada Road median landscaping.
32. Landscaping improvements and signage for Arroyo Vista
Community Park entry.
33. Evaluate feasibility of second vehicular access to Arroyo
Vista Community Park.
34. Landscape north side of Poindexter Avenue from Gabbert Road
east to vicinity of Chaparral School.
City Council Agenda Report
Re: Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives
May 30, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 5, 2002)
Page 5
35. Estabish apricot orchard at one or more locations for
community's historical purposes.
36. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a publicly owned,
privately operated equestrian center.
37. Work with Caltrans to install landscaping and decorative
pavement at Tierra Rejada Road /SR 23 ramps.
38. Develop program to assist City employees as first -time
buyers to purchase housing in the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives.
SK:db
Attachment
M: \City Share /City Manager /Everyone /Goals & Obj to HCC 0605 2002
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals,
Objectives
FY 20021/2003-2
and
�a ,r", K
,p w
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and Objectives
For FY 2002 1/20032
CITY MISSION STATEMENT
Striving to preserve and improve the quality of life in Moorpark.
TOP TEN (10) PRIORITIES
1. Construct new City Hall and Corporate Yard Facility. (F2_&
F27, Flo & F3-S)
2. Construct police station. (F212)
3. Comprehensive update of General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Elements and adopt updated OSCAR Element to
insure internal consistency among all elements of the
General Plan. (G5, G7 & G12)
4. Widen Los Angeles Avenue /New Los Angeles Avenue (SR118) to
six travel lanes from Tierra Rejada Road to SR 23 Freeway
with a raised median and traffic signal interconnect system.
(C3 a),b), c), & -d), & ) E4)
5. Truck ban on Los Angeles /New Los Angeles Avenue (SR118) and
permanent truck scale facility west of the City. (C6 & C8-&
G1$ )
6. Widening of Moorpark Avenue /Walnut Canyon Road from Los
Angeles Avenue (SR118) to north City limits. (C12 & C14-&
G476-)
7. Construct Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II. (F3 & F30-1)
8. Increase City-' .s General-Fund-revenue through enhancement of
existing revenue sources including_ business attraction and
retention programs and establishment of additional revenue
sources. (D1, D3, D7, D9, D16, D17, D18, D19, F11, F16,_&
F37)
9. Enhance open space and greenbelt areas and determine
feasibility of establishing a trail system along the Arroyo
Simi and adj aeent to Miller Pik -and work with other public
agencies to develop a comprehensive Arroyo Simi Management
Plan that incorporates flood control, habitat
preservation /restoration, and recreation components. (G6 &
G17&)
10. n-d- Ddevelop and implement program to
encourage new multi and single family housing on
underutilized sites within the Downtown Specific Plan area
and increase the number of affordable housing units. (B7 &
FG9)
2
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
A. Expand and encourage community involvement in establishing
the general policies of the City and increase the public =s
understanding of local government operations.
i r , F F- events,-
t - � �E --e ti c n t - � :tr E� i i E-4- i- _i �� t E - -$ i t� }tt 3 l E' -- �@�1 zvc -rr cT
3 6 15 eS , h -r-et - i--the£ City's
lnt�ernet me Page, a-ble ehannel,
fflarquee
Ei3s, —rP58 feleases, - ne'vule tie T nM 1
On -going responsibility.
2. Develop a general emergency preparedness manual for
distribution to Moorpark residents. The manual will
outline how to prepare for, and what to do following a
disaster. (ACM)
-3- Prepare a ?up ^ter^_ ir'_^-rl ra i i i nEj City S e - - i - - - and
FRaintain a -1-} - � puloll iemt _-ceps pei4_aininq tee City
o ebb i- 2es ref the C ? t y 1 T i t o r „c e e (AGM T C7)
Part
-
of A.6.
4. Evaluate the feasibility and legality of allowing
electronic messages from the public to be received by
the Mayor and Councilmembers during City Council
meetings. (AS & CC)
5. Evaluate the feasibility of a paperless City Council
agenda packet. (CC & AS)
6. Develop and implement an enhanced city web site that
provides the public with a variety of information about
city services including separate web page for
recreation programs. (AS)
:7. ebtain n ee- es- s- any-- eqaipment —a-n d-- train -- C— ity sta�—te
all-evv iffiFfiediate entry ef infertiiatien -te—be breadeast en
ge= tee-_ -- - - - -- - °-- eable - ° ° - ° ° ° °° czxcrrT
Not currently feasible.
B. Revitalize downtown Moorpark with a focus on High Street and
the surrounding business district and residential
neighborhoods, which includes consideration of public rail
transit, potential for increased residential density, and
governmental and related public uses.
3
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
1. Coordinate the City's efforts to resolve concerns with
day laborers. (MRA)
2. Complete project to landscape the railroad frontage
property along Moorpark Avenue, including the vacant
area west of the south Metrolink parking lot. (CS &MRA)
3. Install landscaping and downtown identification signs
at entrances to High Street. (MRA)
4. Complete the conceptual design for Spring Road from the
railroad tracks south to Los Angeles Avenue, to
determine the design (sidewalk, travel lanes, bike
lanes, medians, parkways, landscaping, entry signs,
etc.) and right -of -way requirements. (PW)
^t s .e uevelep Mevrpurn
D r7 e l
- ct-- a-- r. -vr.�_
eensi-s-tent with B,...,.,tl-..,., Cgeeif ie Plan. (MRA)
Review Downtown Specific Plan and consider modification
to current vision, policies, land use, zoning and
development standards and uses for City /Agency owned
properties. (MRA & CD)
eensL ru et a fire sL L�fi"e7 Vr�High Street. (MDT,
Complete.
7. Develop program to encourage new multi and single
family housing projects on underutilized sites within
the Downtown Specific Plan area and consider
feasibility of City /MRA acquisition of selected sites.
(MRA)
8. Install improved street lighting on designated downtown
residential streets. (MRA)
9. Prepare amendment to Moorpark Rede-�.-elopment. Plan to
extend eminent domain author ty and related ballot
measure. (MRA!
10. Modify land use and zoning and prepare related
documents and construct three affordable housin
on Agenc
Avenue.
-------------------------------------- - - - - -- -- --
i owned site at Millard Street and Los
(MRA & CD )-- - - - - -- - - - -- --
4
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
units
aeles
on Atfenc'
i.:
; t _.
A'1.F r; i7QSvT].t- J6ti'11
C. Improve traffic circulation and mitigate impacts on the
movement of traffic through the City.
1. Work with Caltrans to complete a number of projects
including: (PW)
a) Gerlstruet New Les —2 ngele.'�. Syenicte Bridge widening;
CalTr.ans approval for construction of a
raised med um on Los Angeles Avenue /New Los
-1Fs Z: t I �,r, r:. t c_, t.' ilntit5 to S R 2 3
t = e v.!
b) Installation of a traffic signal interconnect
system and permissive /restrictive left turns at
certain intersections to provide improved signal
coordination and traffic flow on New Los Angeles
Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue;
C) Acquire right -of -way and widen Los Angeles Avenue
at Beltramo Road;
d) Complete design and acquire right -of -way to widen
Los Angeles Avenue between Spring Road and
Moorpark Avenue.
2. Acq:a -r rt. - e ay -a -p pa r� design
additienal —travel l e ti and a Painted
eenter median en New Les -Angeles Avenue and Les - - -- g Avenue [SR -1, 81 between th neate 23- freeway
Rejada Read and c ccx left tu i r lanes —F 6 r— PCSt h Atiic n
v-&
Angeles Avenue to ,thbe r.-a Tierra Reja a Re-'ad-T�7�T
See 1. above.
3. Complete report on the Citywide Traffic Mitigation fee
and develop more precise information on the proposed
east /west route that addresses local issues, including
retention of consultant for an implementation plan
pertaining to the level of improvement required to
serve as an east /west transportation corridor, cost,
funding alternatives and plan for phased
implementation. (PW & CD)
4. Design traffic signal interconnect system on Tierra
Rejada Road from Spring Road to Countrywood Drive and
5
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
evaluate potential use of permissive /restrictive left
turns at certain intersections (PW).
5. Initiate right -of -way acquisition for the improvement
of Los Angeles Avenue (East) from Condor Drive west to
1,500 feet east of Spring Road. (PW)
6. Obtain a truck ban on SR 118 (except freeway portion).
(PW)
7. Install bus benches and shelters at selected City bus
stops. (CS)
8. Work with VCTC, CHP, Caltrans, and County of Ventura to
site a permanent truck scale facility west of the City.
(PW & ACM)
9. Monitor Caltrans' efforts to develop improvement plan
for widening of SR 118 west of Moorpark City limits
including proposed improvements at the SR 118 and SR
34 /Donlon Road intersection. (PW)
10. Pursue grant funding and design for the modification,
improvement, and widening of the rail crossings at
Spring Road and at Moorpark Avenue. (PW)
11. Proceed with street realignment and signalization at
the intersection of Flinn Avenue, Second Street and
Spring Road. (PW)
12. Proceed with the development of the design and
acquisition of additional right -of -way necessary to
provide two southbound lanes on Moorpark Avenue (SR 23)
between Casey Road and Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118).
(PW)
-1�. Pcr h
Complete.
14. Coordinate efforts of various developers to construct
improvements to Walnut Canyon Road (SR 23) from Casey
Road to north City limits to provide lane widening,
paved shoulders, and striped median. (PW & CD)
15. Complete report on potential alternative for SR23
between Broadway and Los Angeles Avenue (PW CE & CD)
G
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
A"a, Sle ^
W. W
D. Strengthen the City's fiscal stability and long -range
financial growth.
1. Develop proposed Business License Program for
consideration by the City Council. (AS)
2. 4pdate 5 eay eZ.L1V1SS. (a v+
Complete_
3. Lego =elep business retentien and ttr et, pregrams and
netwei=king pre�fraffi with existing businesses and attra
new businesses, ineliading the p.Prepareatien ef a City
marketing brochure and related materials for business
attraction and retention. (MRA)
4. When feasible, assist private property ewners of
,7 dr F�� r their
o_
?6E�ft���1 a�— crx-rcc— i�i�tT3�-- z'z6zzc 9 e ^c�c rz,.. si
pr-eper y readied €er develepment to better ,/ng
areiand. (MDT)
On -going responsibility.
5. Revise park land dedication ordinance and Park Master
Plan and evaluate adequacy of current parks
improvements fee for commercial and industrial
development. Evaluate the feasibility of establishing
an endowment fund that would allow for equipment
replacement at parks. (CS)
6. Submit the seven -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
for City Council's consideration by December 31, 2002.
(PW)
7. Complete a comprehensive fee study for development
related fees for consistency with current direct and
indirect costs. (AS)
8 EvaivaCe City's sta CAS relative
zened f-er —i ddstrial uses. (GD)
Complete.
-9-.-8. Implement Cost Recovery Program for Code Enforcement.
(CD & AS)
7
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
1 -4--9. Develop improved cost and time accounting addressing
when to use flat fee amounts instead of deposits for
planning and engineering fees and develop real time
billing rates for all departments. (AS & CD)
-Laa Develop plan for expenditure of Traffic Systems
Management monies collected from development projects
for improvement of air quality. (CSA -S & CD)
1-2-.1_11. Implement program to insure departmental
responsibility and accountability for maintaining the
inventory and protecting the City's fixed assets. (AS)
1 -4_.12. Develop an equitable basis for requirement on new
development projects to provide Affordable Housing
units and or pay in lieu fees and for calculating the
amount of Traffic Systems Management (TSM) fees. (AS—s
CD)
14. Implement a fee to be collected prior to final building
permit approval to pay the City's costs for scanning
approved building permits and plans into an electronic
imaging system. (CC & CD)
15. Begin process to implement GASB 34 requirements to
record infrastructure as capital assets and modify
annual financial reports to include a government -wide
component. (AS, PW & CS)
1j r,` at pc t -'rlt: Ai t ses f()r ;arc -els deeded to Ci +�v by
1
1,
me,.41 ballot. to seek increase in
_
_ ._..., Y i?: i oe street .,hr n3 and landscaping. . (CS &
_ -
1 i f y T
�t•��;c;;zn. �r "r � o; ~e �• �.7g cf towed
19 plc _� f e progi am for businesses requiring
o insure NPDES compliance. (P4 & AS)
E. Reduce the potential for juvenile crime through intervention
and prevention efforts.
1. Develop a Youth Master Plan in collaboration with the
various agencies that serve Moorpark youth, including
8
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
o. r .P,- . ..�
MUSD and Moorpark Boys and Girls Club, and interested
residents to identify existing needs, services and
programs. (CS)
2. Work with community groups and school district to
address violence intervention and drug use among
teenagers. (PD & CS)
3. Determine a location and construct
or - ether -- site--fe3= -a permanent skatepark. (CS)
dufin(j- Mvo
Complete; Council has authorized County Fair Bus.
F. Enhance the delivery of services and expand program
efficiencies.
1. Coordinate City's efforts for proposed transfer of
Waterworks District No. 1 to the City. (CM)
2. Develop_ conceptual design proposal for new City Hall,
council chambers, teen .,nte r, and other government
offices and complete necessary property acquisition. ;
3. Prepare a proposed construction phasing plan for
development of Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II.
(CS)
4. Prepare standard development project conditions of
approval used for each type of entitlement. (CD)
5. Update the Subdivision Ordinance and present it to the
City Council for adoption by December 31, 2001. (CD)
6. Complete a policy and procedures manual for code
enforcement activities. (CD)
7. Develop Citing Procedures for City Council action and
prepare an ordinance making any violation of a City
Ordinance subject to an administrative fine or penalty.
(CD & CA)
OJ
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
4- : A Irlo,
8. Prepare Guidelines for and ifRpleffient preeedures fer
revied, and inspeetien of Landscape and Irrigation
Plans. fer develepment prejeets. (CD)
9. Upd a t e
envirenment-al dee ament
Complete.
10. Prepare an Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual
and revise Purchasing Ordinance and related procedures.
(AS)
11. Complete negotiation of cable television franchise
renewals with Adelphia for City Council consideration
by June 30, 2003 -2-. (ACM)
12. Prepare administrative policies for use of e -mail and
Internet access by City employees. (AS)
13. Evaluate the feasibility of on -line park reservations
and registration for recreation programs. (CS & AS)
14.
oConsider options for funding construction and
maintenance of a community aquatic facility. (CS)
15. In conjunction with other interested agencies, work
with Catholic Charities to locate a permanent site in
Moorpark. (MRA)
16. Complete negotiation of refuse franchise for City
Council consideration including provision for automated
service by December 31-, 2002. _^ giber 3 , 290 (CS)
Qe'l�_Tl L�VS-
17. Evaluate City's law enforcement needs and priorities
and related allocation of resources. (CM & PD)
18.
Complete.
dit/a bit d �. r
19. �f - yea- =- �- ,- ��ea -r 9
Defer.
10
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
2 0 . Obtain !7 !] i t i l _rsrp cwt' e—a at eurrent —le eta tie=r -e f Mee r t.
Peliee —Sta ien to heirs Meerpark's r�rel seryie-T—
( �T
Complete.
21. Develop conceptual and final - design
for police station and determine feasibility of siting
California Highway Patrol and emergency services at
same location. (ACM & PD)
22. Evaluate feasibility and implement additional energy
conservation measures for City facilities including the
option for photovoltaic system and determine
feasibility and cost for electrical generator to serve
Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. (AS & CS)
23. Cenvert existing building-permits
In- progress and now part of on -going responsibility.
24. Update City's Record Retention Schedule to conform to
federal and state law and prepare for increased
destruction of paper records. (CC)
25. Determine feasibility e f and, if feasible, . ennGGf r1 L„ Y
Hall nnex Est rag-- eleetrieal generates G_}
Complete.
26. Develep— State- GLLE-PS grant
peg -i ee -related t e e r, l age purge ses. (AS &- -PD)
On- going.
27. Develop design plans eandidate sites and eests for a
new Corporate Yard for the Public Works and Community
Services maintenance functions. (PW & CS)
28. Devlep and implement plan to -____g"' -rc__ f_e --___...-,l
Comolete.
29. Install mutt mitt dispensers at all City parks. (CS)
30. Construct second restroom /concession /storage facility
at Arroyo Vista Community Park by September 30, 2002 -1.
—(CS)
11
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
31. Construct a play lot and half court basketball court at
Villa Campesina Park. (CS)
32. Install new playground equipment in both play lot areas
at Mountain Meadows Park. (CS)
33. Install new park name monument signs at Villa Campesina
Park, Mountain Meadows Park, and Tierra Rejada Park.
(CS)
34. AeEuYe - p-iLpeT-t- needed - €ter-- rycz��`� Hall, — eer-perall-e - r-
=eU S
G1 ,
35. and- -mot €er e1eelrreal g,e _er_ ter-
R r-eti en Center. ( GS )
Parr F. }2.
6. ?n.p ement o` t:FIS application. (AS)
3? . 11,Ti lenient riew for, tracking, analyzing
ink repc-)rt.ing developer deposits and charges including
-- - - -- __ _ - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- -- --
start rime charges. (AS a (D)
38. Prepare mun ciFal c: e amendment granting authority to
-- -- - - --
issue ,_itations for Lolatic -n of animal control
provi_suions .f the �h �iictpal_ Code (CS1
G. Reinforce and enhance Moorpark =s attractive community
character and safeguard its desirable resources.
1. Work with Ventura County Fire Prevention District to
consider siting a fire station in the Campus Park area
of the City. (ACM)
2. Plan and conduct an emergency response exercise
involving the City Council and a simulated emergency
response drill and update City's SEMS Multi Hazard
Functional Plan (Emergency Plan) and improve
communication capabilities of the City's EOC. (ACM &
PD)
3. Develop Ordinances and related policies and program
guidelines for collection and use of Art in Public
Places and Tree and Landscape fees. (CS & CD)
12
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
r./ 'fir �Lv 'v
4.
- �� -E-)-
Complet.e.
5.ndmin-jetei� — eent-- �--te eComplete an the updated OSCAR
Element of the General Plan and process GPA and
environmental document and update the Park Master Plan
by rune 30, 2003.De-ee-ffibei= :�4:- , 2001. (CD & CS)
6. Develop options to enhance open space and greenbelt
areas for consideration by the City Council. (CM & CD)
7. Process General Plan amendment and Zoning Code
amendment to create a Natural Open Space land use
designation and zone district as initiated by City
Council in 1995. (CD)
8. Prepare a Business Recovery Plan. (AS)
9. Develop affordable housing assistance programs in
conjunction with residential development projects in
the City and develop a five ye program for affordable
housing assistance projects utilizing redevelopment set
aside funds and other available funding sources to
increase the affordable housing stock in Moorpark.
(MRA)
10. Work with State of California to achieve appropriate
reuse of former Caltrans yard including widening of Los
Angeles Avenue. (CD & MRA)
11. Develop plan and conceptual design for City entry
signs. (CS & PW)
12.
Initiate comprehensive update
and Circulation Elements and
consistency among all 7e_neral
to General Plan Land Use
insure _internal
Plan Elements. (CD)
13. Consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to allow
greater use of a variety of residential development
concepts to ensure optimum open space and recreation
amenities while achieving appropriate densities. (CD)
14. Establish design standards for commercial, industrial,
and residential development projects. (CD)
13
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
15. Complete landscaping improvements on south side of Los
Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road.- and the
nay th—s of T--r e i!- s and - west:
16. s # -a- al r- -- m t t _- e; -- (GS)
Complete.
17. Conduct study to determine feasibility of establishing
a trail system along the Arroyo Simi through the City
and east to connect to trail system in Simi Valley.
(PW & CD)
18. Process amendments to City Zone ordinance including
lighting,- signage and second dwelling units. (CD)
19. Analyze f.easibilit- and if f-aS4 ble, prepare_ policy and
standards requiring install -anon of a photovoltaic
system for residential projects for _ consideration by
_Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2003.
20. Plan activities to celebrate City's 20th anniversary of
incorporation. (CS)
14
City Share \City Share \citymgr \Objectives 2002 -2003 DRAFT 020605
v..�.�
ITEM I .
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL BY.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo ,
By: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager'�5 _
DATE: June 6, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Recommendation of Ad -Hoc Committee on Open
Space, Conservation, and Recreation (OSCAR) Element of
the General Plan
DISCUSSION
On October 17, 2001, the City Council reviewed a draft OSCAR
Element of the General Plan and referred it to an Ad -Hoc Committee
of Councilmembers Harper and Mikos to provide staff with direction
for revision. On May 22, 2002, the Ad -Hoc Committee met with the
City Manager and Community Development staff.
One of the topics discussed by the committee was the timing of
revisions to this element with respect to the timing of the North
Park Village project. The General Plan is a long -range plan
identifying goals and policies for the next 10 -15 years. The OSCAR
Element focuses on goals and policies related to the City's
natural resources, open space, and parks within this time period.
The North Park Village plan, if approved by the City Council, the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and the voters of
Moorpark, would add over six square miles to the City.
Inventories of parks and open space would change substantially,
affecting the analysis and issues and possibly also affecting the
goals and policies of the OSCAR Element. Based on the current
schedule, it is expected that the North Park Village plan would be
ready for consideration in the first quarter of 2003. It is quite
likely that there would be substantial changes to the OSCAR
Element if the North Park Village is approved. The committee felt
it was best to delay the element until after the decision is made
by the voters on the North Park Village project.
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002 Regular Meeting
Page 2
Staff will continue to meet individually with the Ad -Hoc Committee
members to discuss specific concerns of the draft element. Should
the schedule for the North Park Village project change
substantially, the Ad -Hoc Committee could revisit the timing of
the OSCAR Element.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept the OSCAR Element Ad -Hoc Committee recommendation to delay
consideration of the element until after a decision is made on the
North Park Village project by the voters of Moorpark.
\ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020619
OSCAR Update.doc 0
1. o v
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ITEM I IAO
Moorpark, California September 19, 2001
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on September 19, 2001 in the Council Chambers of said
City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Pro Tem Harper called the meeting to order at 6:45
p.m.
He announced that Mayor Hunter would be absent from the
meeting until approximately 8:30 p.m.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that
there was no action to report out of the Special Meeting
Closed Session.
2. INVOCATION:
Pastor Dave Wilkinson, Moorpark Presbyterian Church, gave
the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Councilmember John Wozniak led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. ROLL CALL:
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak,
and Mayor Pro Tem Harper.
Mayor Hunter (arrived at 8:11 p.m.)
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager; Joseph Montes, City
Attorney; Wayne Loftus, Director of
Community Development; Ken Gilbert, Director
of Public Works; Mary Lindley, Director of
c
- 2 CC Z Community Services; Dana Shigley, Director
AC r,.�i "=1 __,,_.wT of Administrative Services; Walter Brown,
City Engineer; Captain Robert LeMay,
Sheriff's Department; John Libiez, Planning
Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to
City Manager /City Clerk; and La -Dell
VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk.
't{' %-
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Proclamation to Recognize
Association of Governments
(October 1 - 5, 2001).
September 19, 2001
Southern California
(SCAG) Ride Share Week
Mayor Pro Tem Harper read the proclamation. Alan
Holmes, Account Executive of SCAG, accepted the
proclamation and discussed the purpose of Rideshare
Week.
B. Proclamation to Recognize October as Domestic Violence
Awareness Month.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper read the proclamation. Cathy
Brudnicki, a Member of the Council Against Domestic
Violence (Interface Volunteer), accepted the
proclamation on behalf of that organization.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Scott Green, 33 E. High Street, addressed the Council as a
Chamber of Commerce representative. He invited the
community to attend a unity rally to be held on September
28 at Tierra Rejada Ranch from 5:00 - 8:00 p.m. He
explained that the purpose of the event is to provide
citizens with an opportunity to volunteer for service
organizations and by doing so to support the community and
the country.
Abdul Barakat, Moorpark resident, spoke on behalf of the
Arab - American community and the many contributions that
they have made to Moorpark and to Ventura County.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper expressed his concern about the recent
terrorist events. He stated that America is one country and
that citizens must not turn against each other.
Councilmember Millhouse stated his support of the United
States and complimented Moorpark citizens for their support
and respect for the diversity of the community.
d' G ," r7 Af K',3
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
September 19, 2001
Mayor Pro Tem Harper acknowledged that the City Manager's
Monthly Report had been inadvertently overlooked and is now
being presented.
C. City Manager's Monthly Report
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Kueny stated
that the City Manager's Monthly Report will be
presented by Assistant City Manager Hugh Riley.
Mr. Riley gave an update on the activities of the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, including the
acquisition of the Moorpark Playhouse building located
at 45 High Street by Lawrence Janss & Associates. He
indicated that Janss & Associates has applied for
building permits and has begun preliminary remodeling
work at the site.
Additionally, Mr. Riley stated that escrow closed on
September 18, making the Moorpark Mobilehome Park the
property of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. He
explained that staff members will be meeting with the
former property owner and the residents to ensure a
smooth transition and resident relocation for the
ultimate closure and redevelopment of the mobilehome
park.
Relative to the granary at 192 High Street, previously
occupied by Foster Enterprises, Mr. Riley stated that
the structure has been totally vacated and the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency has taken possession of
it. He said several individuals have expressed
interest in participating with the Agency for the
redevelopment and future expansion of that property.
As an additional item, Mr. Riley stated that
preparation is underway of a Request for
Qualifications to secure the services of a design
architect for the planned Police Services Center to be
established in the 500 block of Spring Road.
Mr. Riley also explained that the property at 798
Moorpark Avenue has been acquired and is in the final
stages of being remodeled. He stated that this site
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4 September 19, 2001
will temporarily house the Moorpark Public Works
Department and ultimately be redeveloped to fulfill
affordable housing needs in the downtown area.
Mr. Riley stated that one of the MRA's future
activities is to develop a time schedule for
modifications to the Redevelopment Project Plan. He
explained that the purpose of those modifications will
be to address further initiatives to develop
affordable housing in the downtown area. He explained
that a joint workshop for the Planning Commission and
City Council is planned to be held on October 22nd for
the purpose of discussing and reviewing the City's
affordable housing policies and possible revisions to
them.
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
Mayor Pro Tem Harper indicated that staff has suggested
that Items 9.A. and 9.B. be considered concurrently. He
also indicated that Mayor Hunter has requested that
consideration of Items 10.B., 10.D. and 10.F. be deferred
until he joins the meeting.
Councilmember Mikos requested that Items 11.F., 11.H., and
11.I. be pulled for individual consideration.
Councilmember Millhouse requested that Item 11.D. be pulled
for individual consideration.
Councilmember Wozniak requested that Item ll.J. be pulled
for individual consideration.
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Councilmember Millhouse announced the beginning of the AYSO
soccer season and that of Moorpark Packer football
activities. He encouraged members of the community to
attend these events.
Councilmember Millhouse also announced the Moorpark Chamber
of Commerce benefit that Mr. Green referred to when he
addressed the Council under Public Comment. He also stated
that the Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring a Flag Display
Banner Program for the community to express its patriotism.
He encouraged that one hundred percent of the proceeds from
AF
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 5 September 19, 2001
these benefits be dedicated to the American Red Cross and
their efforts relative to the September 11th attacks.
Councilmember Mikos announced that the Ventura County
Commission on Human Concerns is presenting its Fourth
Annual Jazz Beneath the Trees barbecue and auction on
September 29th from 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. She stated that it is
being held at the Broom Ranch, located at Pacific Coast
Highway at Carroll Drive. She explained that proceeds from
the event will benefit the homeless.
Councilmember Millhouse requested a future item for the
October 3rd City Council meeting agenda. He requested a
status report and consideration of the possibility of
securing contract assistance relative to the completion of
Arroyo Vista Community Park.
Mayor Pro Tem. Harper announced upcoming teen activities and
the Annual Country Days parade and street fair, which will
be held Saturday, September 29, 2001, from 9:30 a.m. - 4:00
p.m. on High Street.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper
consider modification
prescreening procedure
potential minor effect
and to make the pro
applicants.
requested a future agenda item to
of the General Plan Amendment
relative to projects that may have
on land use and development patterns
Bess less cumbersome for potential
Mayor Pro Tem. Harper also requested a future agenda item
providing a status report relative to the relocation of
Catholic Charities and the potential relocation of the
Chamber of Commerce offices to High Street.
Councilmember Millhouse announced the Boys and Girls Club
Golf Tournament will be October 8 at Tierra Rejada Golf
Club. He encouraged the community to support this event.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 6 September 19, 2001
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Use of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services
(SLES) Grant Funds for the 2001/2002 Fiscal Year.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Conduct a public hearing,
accept testimony regarding the Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Grant as necessary; and 2) Adopt
Resolution No. 2001 -1894, amending the 2001/2002
budget to provide funding for SLES grant funds.
B. Consider Use of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
(LLEBG) Funds for 2001/2002 Fiscal Year. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Conduct a public hearing, accept
testimony regarding the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant (LLEBG) as necessary; 2) Accept the 2001 LLEBG
award and direct staff to use the grant to partially
fund a new 40 -hour patrol officer in the 2001/2002
fiscal year; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1895
amending the 2001/2002 budget to reflect the use of
the 1999,2000, and 2001 LLEBG funds.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that Items 9.A. and 9.B.
will be considered concurrently.
Dana Shigley gave the staff report for both items.
Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearings for Items
9.A. and 9.8.
Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers
for these items.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper closed the public hearings.
There being no Council discussion, the following
motions were heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1894, amending
the 2001/2002 budget to provide funding for Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services grant funds. The motion carried by 4 -0
roll call vote, Mayor Hunter absent for the vote.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to: 1) accept the 2001 Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant (LLEBG) award and direct staff to use the grant to
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 7
September 19, 2001
partially fund a new 40 -hour patrol officer in the 2001/2002
fiscal year; and 2) adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1895 amending the
2001/2002 budget to reflect the use of the 1999,2000, and 2001
LLEBG funds. The motion carried by 4 -0 roll call vote, Mayor
Hunter absent for the vote.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider County of Ventura's Moorpark Road Realignment
Project. (Continued from September 5, 2001.) Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Ken Gilbert gave the staff report.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Gilbert
confirmed that the raised medians will be 6 -inch or
higher and that the curb noses will be painted yellow.
In addition, Mr. Gilbert stated that a lane delineator
will be painted for standard traffic safety. He
stated that raised painted markers could be placed on
the medians to further enhance their visibility at
night.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that additional markings
would be helpful.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Ms. Traffenstedt
stated that Butch Britt from the County of Ventura has
indicated that he is available to answer questions
relative to this item.
Councilmember Mikos concurred that the additional
reflective markers are necessary to ensure that the
medians are visible to motorists at night.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Britt
confirmed that the raised median does not extend the
entire length of the striping as shown on stamped page
12 of the staff report. He stated that only the
triangular area is the raised portion of the median.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that the use of Bots
dots to emphasize the turning traffic patterns should
be included in the final design.
CL
C a
e
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 8
September 19, 2001
Mr. Gilbert explained that the drawing presents the
use of the dots on the left side of the turning
vehicle, which is the typical placement of them. He
suggested that this decision be reviewed by the
traffic engineer for the best solution and to
determine whether the dots should be used on the left
or the right hand side of the turning vehicle.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper expressed concern that on the
southbound and the northbound left turn lanes opposing
traffic has only a stripe between them. He indicated
that he would like to see the limit line moved back
farther if it does not present a line of sight
problem.
Mr. Gilbert stated that that raised painted markers
would guide the left - turning vehicles to the proper
location.
Councilmember Hillhouse stated that he agrees with
Mayor Pro Tem Harper's concern because to the extent
that the limit line is backed up even if traffic feeds
correctly, it is physically impossible for a motorist
turning left onto the new Moorpark Road to impact in
front of the other vehicle.
Mr. Gilbert said that this will be reviewed in the
design development phase of the alignment of the
intersection.
Mr. Montes clarified that the Council's action should
include reference to the fact that this is in response
to an appeal by the County of Ventura from City
staff's denial. He stated that with respect to the
appeal, this is the action that the Council is taking.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion for adoption of the design of Exhibit 1 as
provided in the staff report and directed staff to: 1) review
the placement of Bots dots to channel the right- turning traffic
and the accompanying striping; 2) review the backing up of the
limit line for the northbound and southbound left -turn lanes; 3)
issue the encroachment permit upon that particular design; 4)
upon completion of the design by the City Engineer and the
County of Ventura, bring the design back to the Council for
review and final approval for the purpose of establishing design
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 9
September 19, 2001
immunity; 5) direct that this action be recognized as a response
to the County of Ventura's appeal. The motion carried by 3 -1
voice vote, Mayor Pro Tem Harper dissenting and Mayor Hunter
absent for the vote.
C. Consider Pre - Qualification of Bidders for Major
Construction Projects. Staff Recommendation: 1)
Direct staff to prepare and present to the City
Council, an amendment to the Engineering Policies and
Standards adopting policies and procedures for the
Pre - Qualification of Bidders, said program to be based
on the program promulgated by the State Department of
Industrial Relations; and 2) Direct staff to include,
unless otherwise directed by the City Manager, in the
contract documents and bidding procedures used for any
future construction project in excess of $1,000,000,
appropriate requirements for the pre - qualification of
prospective bidders.
Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper asked if the threshold for
projects that qualify for this pre- screening of
applicants should be lowered from $1,000,000 to
$500,000. He noted that the City does not often
have projects that are in the one million dollar cost
category.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Gilbert
explained that the process is very complex even to the
extent of the City potentially being required to hire
a consultant to assist in the process. He stated that
the process adds major cost to a project. He stated
that it is the large projects that pose more
opportunity due to their complexity for problems to
arise with a questionable contractor than with a less
complex project.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper questioned that if a contractor
is deemed to be excluded from one project as a result
of this pre- screening process, can they then apply to
bid on another City project, or can they be excluded
for a period of time from bidding on City projects.
Mr. Gilbert stated that the law is established such
that the City can do one of two things. Mr. Gilbert
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 10
September 19, 2001
continued by stating that the first allowable process
is for the City to conduct an annual qualification
process and any bidder that would ultimately qualify
for any project or any category of a project in the
next year over a million dollars could satisfy those
requirements. He explained that, if a potential
bidder is not qualified one year during the annual
review, they could feasibly resubmit an application
the next year to bid on projects that exceed the
million dollar threshold. He then stated that the
second possibility is that the City can establish a
project- specific pre - qualification process which is
the alternative that staff is recommending. He stated
that within this second alternative, when the City is
aware of a project of a certain level and expertise, a
pre - qualification process would be developed that
would precede the bid opening. He explained that
under the second described process, if a contractor
was not qualified, they could perceivably bid on a
future million dollar project within the same year.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Gilbert
explained that the benefit of establishing a project -
specific pre - qualification process is that the
questionnaire would be tailored to a specific project.
Mr. Gilbert stated that if the Council provided
direction at any time to modify the policy to adopt
the annual qualification process that could be
implemented as the program allows.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated
that upon the adoption of an annual qualification
process for projects of $1,000,000 or more, it would
not eliminate a potential bidder who was not on the
list from bidding on projects that were less than that
amount.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated
that he has received some examples from other cities,
but no extensive research has been done. He stated
that there is not a lot of historical experience yet
since the law was adopted in 1999 and the program was
just implemented in 2000.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Ms. Traffenstedt
stated that there are no speakers for this item.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 11
September 19, 2001
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Millhouse
seconded a motion to: 1) direct staff to prepare and present to
the City Council an amendment to the Engineering Policies and
Standards adopting policies and procedures for the Pre -
Qualification of Bidders, said program to be based on the
program promulgated by the State Department of Industrial
Relations; and 2) direct staff to include, unless otherwise
directed by the City Manager, in the contract documents and
bidding procedures used for any future construction project in
excess of $1,000,000, appropriate requirements for the pre -
qualification of prospective bidders. The motion carried by 4 -0
voice vote, Mayor Hunter absent for the vote.
E. Consider Proposed Modifications to Aggregate Mining
Operations in Unincorporated Ventura County for Grimes
Rock (CUP 4874), Best Rock Products (CUP 4171); and
Wayne J. Sand and Gravel (CUP 4571); County of
Ventura. Staff Recommendation: 1) Direct the City
Engineer to review and comment on the traffic report;
and 2) have staff prepare comments expressing
opposition to the proposed modification and present
conditions for inclusion to the modification
approvals.
Wayne Loftus gave the staff report. He stated that
the County has extended the comment time period to
October 5, 2001.
Councilmember Wozniak expressed concerns about some
inconsistencies in the staff report relative to Grimes
Rock's trips per day. He stated that the table on
stamped page No. 104 reflects a proposed total of 300
trips per day, but the proposed Major Modification
figure on stamped page No. 103 is 460 trips per day.
In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Loftus
stated that staff will verify the total trips as it
may be an error in the table.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Loftus
acknowledged that it is a possibility that not all of
the trucks of the increased activity at these sites
will be traversing Walnut Canyon Road, but that the
increase in activity is significant enough to cause
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 12 September 19, 2001
concern by City staff about redirected truck traffic
on Walnut Canyon Road.
Councilmember Wozniak explained that the proposed
operations are being increased from the hours of 6
a.m. to dusk to 24 -hour operations and he stated that
this increase in operational hours requires review
relative to the overall impact. He also expressed
concern and stated that their proposal for Saturday
operations and for 24 -hour operation is unacceptable.
He stated that the citizens of Moorpark should not pay
the price for the expansion of this project.
Councilmember Wozniak also stated that the City of
Moorpark has conditioned Toll Brothers, as an approved
developer within this geographical area, to perform
major construction at the intersection of State Route
118 and Grimes Canyon Road. He explained that the
City must ask the County to review Grimes Canyon Road
as an alternative route for these trucks, and also to
emphasize to the County of Ventura that the Saturday
truck operation schedule is unacceptable to the City
of Moorpark.
Councilmember Mikos stated support for those concerns
as expressed by Councilmember Wozniak and stated that
the County of Ventura should require mitigation of
these traffic concerns. She also stated that City
personnel must have a personal presence at these
hearings to present the City's posture relative to
this item.
Councilmember Millhouse requested an agenda item that
requires the consideration of a letter being composed
to the County of Ventura relative to this item, with
the letter to be reviewed by the City Attorney to
ensure comments are appropriate and to include that
the truck trips will be conducted on the "off- hours"
and not traverse the roads during the peak traffic
times.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper's question
relative to whether the traffic generation numbers
provided in Table 1 (stamped page 104) are the actual
number of truck trips, Mr. Loftus stated that those
numbers are representative of the actual number of
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 13
September 19, 2001
proposed truck trips. He stated that the question is
if a truck trip should be considered the same as an
auto trip relative to size and weight on the streets
and the impacts to the community. Mr. Loftus
explained that one of the issues is that the City is
doing its part to improve Walnut Canyon Road by
conditioning developers, such as Toll Brothers, Sun
Cal, West Pointe, and Morrison, to construct and fund
improvements, and that the County appears to be taking
advantage of these improvements by allowing the
channeling of more heavy traffic on Walnut Canyon Road
without regard to the consequences.
Mayor Pro Tem. Harper requested clarification as to the
County of Ventura's rationale for restricting access
by heavy truck traffic to Grimes Canyon Road.
Mr. Loftus responded that reasons previously given by
the County are that: 1) Grimes Canyon Road is a narrow
and twisted roadway; 2) that the intersection with
State Route (SR) 118 is not configured in such a way
to allow for a large truck to make a left turn without
difficulty; and 3) there is no traffic control at the
intersection of SR -118 and Grimes Canyon Road making
it dangerous for such eastbound turns to be made by a
large truck, although there are improvements proposed
for that intersection which would make that argument
irrelevant at some point in time. He stated that the
City's reasons for the truck traffic not traversing
Walnut Canyon Road include impacts to sensitive
receptors such as two schools, the library, the Senior
Center, City Hall, a commercial district and a
residential area. He stated that the City's reasons
for not channeling the mining truck traffic onto
Walnut Canyon Road seem more compelling than the
reasons cited by the County of Ventura for not using
Grimes Canyon Road for the truck traffic. Mr. Loftus
recommended that this is an item to be included in the
letter that will be sent to the County.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that Grimes Canyon Road
should be the preferred route for the mining truck
traffic since it is a rural route. He continued by
stating that the purpose of the improvements to Walnut
Canyon Road /Moorpark Avenue is not to invite or allow
additional truck traffic.
. -, .• 67� ,
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 14
September 19, 2001
Councilmember Mikos stated that staff should ascertain
how many truck trips there are from other companies
historically in addition to Grimes Rock, Best Rock
Products and Wayne Jones Sand and Gravel to allow the
Council to address the cumulative truck traffic and
have specific information to effectively present its
arguments to the County. She suggested that staff
review the issue that existed previously when Transit
Mix truck traffic was a contentious item with the City
of Moorpark. Councilmember Mikos also stated that
this traffic issue should be subject to the reciprocal
traffic mitigation agreement with the County if it
adopted by the Council, otherwise the County is not
responsible for any cost or consequences of their
actions in this regard.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Ms. Traffenstedt
stated that there are no speaker cards for this item.
There being no further Council discussion, the
following motion was heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to: 1) direct the City Engineer to review and
comment on the traffic report; 2) direct staff to prepare
comments expressing opposition to the proposed modification and
present conditions for inclusion to the modification approvals
based upon the City Council comments and direction provided;
3) direct staff to prepare a letter to the County of Ventura
including these comments for the Council's review at the October
3, 2001 meeting after review and approval by the City Attorney;
and 4) direct staff to attend the noticed hearing before the
Board of Supervisors when this item is considered by that body.
The motion carried by 4 -0 voice vote, Mayor Hunter absent for
the vote.
Mayor Pro Tem. Harper stated that the City Council
should consider addressing its concerns relative to
County matters to officials extending beyond the
District 4 County Supervisor's office.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter arrived. The
time was 8:11 P.M.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 15 September 19, 2001
B. Consider Teen Council Appointments. Staff
Recommendation: Waive appointment recruitment policy
to allow use of prior recruitment applications and
make one appointment to the Teen Council for a term to
end on June 30, 2002.
Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to waive the Council's appointment recruitment
policy to allow use of prior recruitment applications to make
one appointment to the Teen Council for a term to end 6/30/02.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that
there were no public speakers for this item.
MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Harper seconded
the nomination of Elizabeth Saidkhanian to the Teen Council for
a term to end June 30, 2002. The motion carried by unanimous
voice vote.
D. Consider Reciprocal Traffic Mitigation Agreement.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the subject Agreement,
subject to final language approval by the City Manager
and City Attorney, and authorize the Mayor to execute
said document.
Ken Gilbert gave the staff report.
He stated that staff is recommending the deletion of
the language precluding the challenge of projects,
Section I -E and II -E of the Agreement, stating that
each party would not challenge a project which had
been approved by the other; also that the language may
be deleted from the final draft agreement between the
County and the City of Moorpark that each party could
preserve its right to challenge any land use
entitlement decision made by the other party.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Gilbert responded
that this agreement is being considered by other
cities and the Board of Supervisors in the near
future. He stated that the methodologies and the
formulas are consistent, but the fees are of different
valuation between each city within the County and are
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 16 September 19, 2001
based upon the valuation within that zone and are
approved by that jurisdiction.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny agreed that the
City will consider the removal of Sections IE and IIE
from the pending agreement.
Councilmember Millhouse requested deletion of the
language in Section IE and IIE.
In response to Councilmember Mikos regarding how the
deletion of Sections IE and IIE affect approved
projects, Mr. Gilbert stated that once a project has
vested rights an entity does not revert and try to
extract more fees from that project.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny
identified previously approved projects that would be
exempt such as the industrial and commercial portions
of the Carlsberg Specific Plan.
Mr. Gilbert stated that every project that would
travel on state roads or County roads would not pay a
fee to the City. He stated that every project in zone
14 would pay a fee to the City regardless if they
have truck routes that attempt to have trucks off the
city's roads. He suggested that an item to be added
to the letter to the County of Ventura is that
regardless of when the reciprocal agreement is adopted
that the fees apply to that project, because once it
has vested rights, then they would not have to pay
that fee.
Councilmember Mikos emphasized that the payment of the
fees to the City upon adoption of the reciprocal
agreement with the County of Ventura should be an item
in the letter to the County as part of addressing the
entire traffic issue.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, City Attorney
Joseph Montes stated that the issue of annexation
relative to this agreement is that once the property
became part of the City then, if the project went
forward, the City would collect the appropriate
mitigation fees and forward them on to the County.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 17 September 19, 2001
Mr. Kueny stated that the fee would be conditioned at
the time of entitlement when the vesting tentative
tract map was considered.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that he wants the
understanding that the vesting tract map is an
entitlement and not an annexation with this agreement.
Mr. Montes stated that this clarification can be made
a part of the Council action relative to this item.
Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers
for this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to: 1) approve the Agreement, subject to final
language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, and
authorize the Mayor to execute said document; 2) to delete the
Sections I -E and II -E of the final draft Agreement stating that
each party would not challenge a project which had been approved
by the other; and 3) to support the understanding that the
vesting tract map is an entitlement and not an annexation under
the terms of this agreement. The motion carried by unanimous
voice vote.
F. Consider Report on Proposed Development for Former
Specific Plan No. 8 /Hidden Creek (now named North
Park). Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed
appropriate.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to waive their
rules of procedure to allow the applicant an extension of the
three - minute public presentation time period for his
presentation to the Council.
Kim Kilkenny, Village Development Offices, 350 W. Ash
Street, San Diego, the applicant for the proposed
North Park Plan, gave a presentation on the North Park
Nature Preserve and Village Plan conceptual land
uses. Mr. Kilkenny included in his presentation the
reasons why and how the project has been redesigned
from the previous Specific Plan 8, the Hidden Creek
Ranch Project, to the present conceptual plan. He
stated the following proposed specific components of
the developer's conceptual plan as being: 1) 2,616
acres of proposed open space (70% of the planning area
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 18
September 19, 2001
is proposed to be Open Space); 2) traffic relief - the
applicant is proposing construction of a new freeway
off ramp and a new arterial street to Moorpark College
providing a second access to the College to alleviate
traffic congestion that currently exists; 3) the
proposed plan avoids all impacts on agricultural land;
4) the creation of a youth sports complex (30 acres
dedicated to youth sports) to include a gymnasium,
basketball courts, seven little league sized baseball
fields, tennis courts, and tot lots would be for City
use but not maintained at City expense; 5) creation of
a 55 -acre recreation lake that would be privately
maintained, but would be open to Moorpark residents
for recreational uses; 6) to deal with the City's
concern relative to the fiscal impact of new
development, by proposing that each home would pay a
developer fee of $4,800; additionally, a fiscal impact
analysis would be performed as a condition of the
approval of the first subdivision map and if that
analysis documents that there is an operating
shortfall on the part of the City, the developer would
be required to establish an endowment fund to solve
that through the payment of additional fees; 7) a
reduction from the previously proposed 3,200 homes to
1,500 single- family detached homes.
Mr. Kilkenny stated that the developer agrees to pay
the fees that appeared in the previous Development
Agreement as being: park improvement fees, development
fees, community service fees, library fees, air
quality fees, city -wide traffic fees, but that
agreement would have to be reached for payment of
police fees, fire protection fees (including
dedicating a two -acre site for a fire station site),
pay its fair share for intersection improvements, and
provide park improvements well in excess of the local
Quimby Act requirements. Mr. Kilkenny stated that the
developer would have to reserve 12 acres for a school
site and identify a site for expansion for Moorpark
Community College for parking and to allow for the
creation of a satellite high school to relieve
overcrowding at the present facilities. Additionally,
Mr. Kilkenny stated the developer would agree to pay
mandated school fees as established by State law.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Paae 19
September 19, 2001
Mr. Kilkenny addressed a concern that the actual
project approved might be modified to cause greater
impact on the community than the original proposed
project. He stated that the developer has put
safeguards in the proposal as follows: 1) any effort
to increase the number of homes would have to be voter
approved; 2) any effort to decrease the size of the
nature preserve or the other Open Space would have to
be voter approved; and 3) any effort to decrease the
size of the buffers in the plan would have to be voter
approved.
He stated that concerns have been raised about
environmental review relative to the fact that the
developer is electing to go through the initiative
process. He stated that a certified EIR has been done
that reviews the whole of the property and that
information is available to the public. He also
stated it is important to note that any future
subdivision approvals and any future annexations will
require additional environmental review.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kilkenny explained
that the developer has elected to use the initiative
process as opposed to the more traditional route of
proposing their plan to the Council, because they
believe the public is the ultimate approver of any
proposed plan and the developer wants to find out if
the public approves of their proposal without them
spending all of the preliminary resources by going the
more traditional route.
Mayor Hunter stated that in the previous proposal for
this land the Environmental Impact Report had cited
nine unavoidable environmental impacts. He asked Mr.
Kilkenny what if any of those nine items have been
removed with the plan currently being formulated.
Mr. Kilkenny indicated that traffic impact would be
reduced significantly, agricultural land impact would
be eliminated, impact on the vernal pool previously
identified would be eliminated, and viewshed and
grading impacts have been reduced.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kilkenny stated that
the developer has not yet considered how the proposed
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 20 September 19, 2001
plan would comply with the City's Hillside Ordinance,
but upon analysis that information would be made
available to the City Council and to the public.
Mayor Hunter requested clarification relative to the
traffic circulation in the area of Moorpark College.
He stated that he understands the modifications and
creation of a new intersection may pose additional
traffic problems and that nearby residents would have
to enter the freeway to go a short distance to the
Moorpark College campus.
Mr. Kilkenny acknowledged this was an issue that
required further evaluation.
Mayor Hunter explained that under the Hidden Creek
Ranch agreement, the City would have received 3.9% of
the 1% property tax fund from the County and that a
one -time, per lot fee was proposed to offset that
diminished funding from the County. He asked Mr.
Kilkenny what Village Development would propose to
offset the property tax impact.
Mr. Kilkenny stated that the property tax allocation
is out of their control, but that the developer would
conduct a fiscal impact analysis to ensure that the
City is made financially whole by the developer's
payment of additional fees if necessary. He stated
that the developer would perform an annual fiscal
analysis during the term of the buildout of the
project and, if it was determined that the City was
not fiscally whole, then the developer would be
required to make up any shortfall.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kilkenny stated that
the youth sports facility complex would be maintained
through assessment district funding or other property
based revenue system. He stated that the construction
would be the obligation of the developer, assuming the
City agreed with that arrangement, and the maintenance
would be the obligation of the future property owners.
Additionally, in response to Mayor Hunter, Mr.
Kilkenny stated that the property is owned and
continues to be owned by Messenger Investment
Corporation. He stated that there are lenders on the
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 21 September 19, 2001
property one of those being Village Development. He
explained that the lenders have agreed to assume
management of the property.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper's question
relative to the management of the proposed open space,
Mr. Kilkenny stated that the property owner would be
obligated to convey ownership of the Nature Preserve
to a third party owner /manager with City concurrence.
He stated that at the time of that conveyance, the
City of Moorpark would receive an open space easement
to ensure that the land was not sold by the management
entity.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper discussed the dedication of land
versus the reservation of land for a satellite high
school. He asked if this could be made part of the
document that is submitted to the voters during the
initiative process.
Mr. Kilkenny stated that the developer will meet with
the School District to resolve the issue of
reservation versus dedication of the land for both the
high school and the other school site.
Mr. Harper asked if the recreational lake could be
added to the list of items that could not be modified
without voter approval. He expressed concern that
otherwise it might be eliminated or downsized from the
property.
Mr. Kilkenny agreed that it can be added to that list
of items for voter approval, with the caveat that the
developer has concerns that they may not be able to
gain State and Federal environmental permits for the
creation of the lake. He stated that the intent is to
guarantee due diligence on the part of the developer
in procuring the permits to build the lake.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper asked if a detailed phasing plan
has been considered.
Mr. Kilkenny stated that in two instances a phasing
plan has been considered. The first is relative to the
Nature Preserve, since that is the monumental
component of the plan, the developer has indicated
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 22
September 19, 2001
that there be an irrevocable open space easement to
the City or to the third party management entity, upon
approval of the first subdivision map; and the second
is relative to the construction of the State Route 118
intersection and the connecting road. He stated that
the developer is proposing a two faceted guarantee:
1) Upon approval of the initial building permit, the
property owner would have to guarantee through the
creation of a community facility district that the
funding would be available to complete that
construction; and 2) no more than 500 homes could be
permitted without the freeway interchange being
completed.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that an addendum to the
current EIR should be presented to the voters relative
to the modifications that are being proposed to the
plan.
Councilmember Millhouse requested a description of the
plan for the open space greenbelt separation between
the cities of Moorpark and Simi Valley.
Mr. Kilkenny explained that the Nature Preserve Open
Space proposed for this greenbelt separation does not
allow any development, but is strictly to accommodate
trails, environmental rehabilitation, and similar
activity. He indicated that the Nature Preserve on
the east end is approximately one - quarter mile wide
and that the buffer between existing lots and proposed
lots is stated in the initiative as being 500 feet
minimum. He emphasized that the stated buffer is
between lots and not homes necessarily.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kilkenny
stated that five of the proposed little league fields
would be regulation size and two of them would be the
size to accommodate T -ball.
Mr. Kilkenny clarified that the proposed gymnasium
would be comparable in size to that of the Arroyo
Vista Community Park gymnasium. He was unable to
confirm that the proposed size includes the comparable
space to include a recreation center as well. He
stated that the basketball courts and tennis courts
would be standard size.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 23 September 19, 2001
Councilmember Millhouse expressed concern relative to
the traffic congestion in the area and stated that all
consideration to reduce it should be given to the
residents in the area.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kilkenny
described the overall plan as having 1,500 homes
located on 770 acres, which is approximately two homes
per acre. He stated that the initiative language
requires that the minimum lot size would be
approximately 7,000 square feet. He stated that the
project would be a somewhat higher -end community that
is oriented toward youth and toward the lake amenity.
Mr. Kilkenny described the proposed architectural
style as being an agrarian, mission style.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that it would be
beneficial to be able to compare this proposed project
to another one in the area with similar
characteristics.
Mr. Kilkenny stated that they will bring back a
comparison of the lake size to one in the vicinity
once that can be determined.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper offered that 55 acres would be
comparable to approximately 90% of the land mass
surface area of Arroyo Vista Community Park.
Councilmember Wozniak emphasized for the benefit of
the public awareness that the property being discussed
is the same property that was previously proposed as
the Hidden Creek Ranch project.
Councilmember Wozniak requested that language be
included in the initiative that explains to the voters
the former Hidden Creek Ranch project and to make it
clear in the measure that the fees are being passed
from the City to the developer for the construction of
the freeway interchange. He also stated if the
initiative is included on the ballot, a copy of the
specific initiative language should be provided to
every voter for their review prior to the election.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 24
September 19, 2001
Mr. Kilkenny stated initiative language can be drafted
to include the history of the property and make
reference to it being the former Hidden Creek Ranch
project. He continued by stating that it will be made
clear in the measure that the fees are being passed
from the City to the developer for the construction of
the freeway interchange. Thirdly, Mr. Kilkenny stated
that it is the developer's intent to provide every
voter with a copy of the initiative language and
graphics for their review.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kilkenny
responded that the total acreage of the revised plan
is 3,538 acres.
Councilmember Mikos expressed concern that the
original project of 3,221 homes was proposed for an
area of 4,100 acres and that this project of 1,500
homes is proposed for an area of 3,538 acres. She
stated that this could be misleading to the voters
since the number of homes has been reduced by half,
but the acreage has been reduced as well. She stated
that the public will be wary of what will happen on
the remainder of that property.
Councilmember Mikos also stated that one way the
developer could exercise their due diligence is to
follow the traditional method of proposing to the City
first for approval of the project and then let the
voters decide on the project as an item on the ballot.
She clarified that the environmental review would be
complete during the process and those concerns would
be addressed.
Councilmember Mikos expressed concern relative to a
set of home building sites on the eastern end of the
proposed project that had previously been identified
by the resource protection agencies as requiring
protection and maintenance in a natural state. She
clarified that if the project was approved in
initiative form and the Council's required
environmental review later revealed that an area could
not be developed, it would cause great concern over
what situation would result from those circumstances
and the location of the displaced building sites. She
said the way to avoid this situation is to drop all
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 25
pending litigation against
environmental review be accomr-
the project to proceed to the
concern about the water supply
including the lake.
September 19, 2001
the City, let the
dished, and then allow
ballot. She expressed
for the entire project
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kilkenny
stated that the developer does not perceive their
ballot measure timing as being rushed. He stated that
this project has been in the planning process for over
12 years and that sufficient information is available
for it to be considered by the voters.
Councilmember Mikos stated her concern with the
process of going forward with the ballot measure. She
asked how long the lenders have been involved with the
project.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kilkenny
responded that the lenders have been involved since
the property was acquired over 12 years ago.
Mayor Hunter asked Mr. Kilkenny if he is aware that
the owners of this property owe the City of Moorpark
in excess of $150,000.
Mr. Kilkenny stated he's aware of a condition in the
previous Development Agreement where the applicant of
the prior project agreed to pay the City equivalent to
that, but he stated that the Development Agreement was
repealed by the voters. He stated that with that
repeal any obligation to pay those fees and any
benefit received by the General Plan Update expired.
Mr. Kilkenny continued by stating that the developer
is willing to pay that amount when this matter is
placed on the ballot regardless of whether or not it
is passed by the voters.
Mayor Hunter expressed concern that adequate
information will not be made available to the public
prior to them being asked to sign a petition to place
this item on the ballot.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper stated that there are other fees
owed relative to previous actions. He stated that
there is property tax owed to the County of Ventura
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 26 September 19, 2001
and additional fees still outstanding to the attorneys
who prevailed in the legal actions. He asked if a
global settlement is being formulated to address the
issue of outstanding obligations.
Mr. Kilkenny responded that the entire litigation
issue is currently being evaluated. He stated that he
is not aware of the property tax issue, but will
provide the information to the Council.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Harper, Mr. Kilkenny
confirmed that former State Senator Alan Robbins, one
of the original lenders, continues to have a lending
interest on the property.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kilkenny
confirmed that the outstanding Development Agreement
fees due to the City would be paid within 24 hours of
the measure being placed on the election ballot.
Mr. Kilkenny responded to Councilmember Mikos'
question relative to the lenders who have interest in
the subject property. He stated that they are the
Messenger family, Mr. Baldwin, Alan Robbins, and Curci
Investments, LLC.
Mr. Kilkenny concluded his presentation and thanked
the Council for their time and consideration.
Richard Francis, addressed the Council as a
representative of SOAR (Save our Open Space and
Agricultural Resources), 711 South A Street, Oxnard.
He stated that he attended the LAFCO (Local Agency
Formation Commission) meeting today and they rescinded
the annexation of the Hidden Creek Ranch property.
Mr. Francis explained the role of SOAR in the process
of development reviews. He urged Village Development
to reconsider the initiative process that they are
pursuing and to allow the traditional process of City
Council review to occur.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Francis
stated that SOAR does not address the initiative
process. He clarified that SOAR was passed to provide
an additional step in the public approval of the
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 27 September 19, 2001
development of lands in each City within the County
that adopted it.
Councilmember Harper expressed his concern relative to
the use of the initiative process by the developer.
He asked Mr. Francis if he foresees this process being
precluded by any legal requirements or limitations of
SOAR.
Mr. Francis responded that he does not foresee the
process being precluded by SOAR He stated that the
initiative process is a constitutional guarantee in
the State of California. He confirmed there is
nothing that SOAR can do to enhance or preclude the
initiative process, since SOAR is a local measure in
each City that adopted it.
Mayor Pro Tem Harper asked Mr. Francis if the
developer's initiative process would fulfill the
requirements of the SOAR vote if constructed
correctly.
Mr. Francis stated that he cannot confirm whether the
process fully complies to SOAR.
Kenneth Moss, addressed the Council as a Moorpark
business owner. Mr. Moss spoke in support of the
proposed project. He stated that he is not a paid
consultant for this project.
Mayor Pro Tem. Harper stated that although no Council
action is required at this time, the Council could
authorize staff to perform a cursory analysis for
fatal flaws of the proposed ballot measure of issues
that the Council may need to act upon in the future
and provide recommendation to make these known to the
public; and authorize staff to determine what the
City's involvement is with a company that owes the
City substantial back fees. He stated that giving
no information to the public is shying away from the
responsibility that the Council has to the public.
Councilmember Mikos stated that until the developer
formally submits the initiative documents to the City
Clerk, it remains unknown to the City Council what
comprises the proposed project. She stated that to
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 28 September 19, 2001
direct staff to explore this analysis is premature
until the developer presents the initiative documents
to the City Clerk.
Councilmember Millhouse requested a timing and
priority review explanation from staff relative to the
City's priorities and how this project fits into that
timeframe.
Mr. Kueny addressed the City's concerns as follows: 1)
the City objects to the developer pursuing the
initiative process because of the legal process and
unstated facts given to the public and for additional
reasons stated by the Council; 2) the safeguards in
the proposed agreements are unilaterally offered and
the public expects that the Council will put them into
the development agreement or one that would put it to
a vote to provide public response; 3) relative to the
timing, Mr. Kueny stated that the developer
politically desires to communicate with the present
City Council because it's a known entity; 4) relative
to the process being of such long duration, Mr. Kueny
offered that the extended process in the past was due
to unpaid bills and the delay in providing information
on the part of the past developer.
Mr. Kueny offered that the traditional process for
approval of this project could be outlined as being
considered by the Council as late as October 2002 and
have an election January 14, 2003. Mr. Kueny stated
that this would allow adequate time to allow
sufficient EIR review and meet and answer the
Council's and public's questions.
Mr. Kueny stated that the base EIR document may be
reusable, but the eastern portion of the site does not
have the same level of environmental analysis of the
property that was done prior to this project.
Mr. Kueny also stated that the safeguard for the
developer is that anytime the developer is
dissatisfied with the progress on the City side then
he can pay whatever he is going to pay and have its
initiative qualified for a ballot. Mr. Kueny
explained that such potential action keeps the City
working toward the proposed schedule and process.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 29 September 19, 2001
Councilmember Mikos stated that Mr. Kueny's suggestion
is reasonable in terms of trying to go through the
process and in accommodating the applicant's timeline.
At the request of Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kilkenney returned
to the podium to address the Council. He stated that
he did not anticipate the questions relative to the
difference in the process. He stated that he will
consult with the City Manager further relative to
responses to the questions posed this evening.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to continue
this item to the regular City Council meeting of October 5,
2001.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting the Council took a recess. The
time was 10:08 p.m. The Council reconvened into open session at
10:28 p.m.
Relative to Item 10.C., the Consideration of the Pre -
Qualification of Bidders for Major Constructions Projects,
Councilmember Millhouse requested reconsideration of this
item due to information that was not apparent to the
Council for their action at the initial consideration.
Mayor Hunter requested that if reconsidered, the Council
remove the language of No. 2 of the staff recommendation
which states "to direct staff to include unless otherwise
directed by the City Manager in the contract for bidding
for the pre - qualification of prospective bidders" and
revise it to read "direct staff to include in the contract
documents in the bidding procedures used for any future
construction projects in excess of $1,000,000 appropriate
requirements for prospective bidders."
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion for reconsideration of the vote for Item 10.0
with the above stated amendment. The motion passed by unanimous
voice vote.
MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion for approval of the staff recommendation for
Item 10.C. with the amendment of No. 2 of the staff
recommendation to read as follows: To direct staff to include
in the contract documents in the bidding procedures used for any
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 30 September 19, 2001
future construction projects in excess of $1,000,000 appropriate
requirements for prospective bidders. The motion passed by
unanimous voice vote.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the
exception of Items 11.D., 11.F, ll.H., ll.I, and 11.J. The
motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meeting
of City Council and Parks and Recreation Commissioners
of May 24, 2001.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of
June 20, 2001.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of
August 29, 2001.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for the 2000-
2001 Fiscal Year - September 19, 2001.
Manual Warrants 107010 - 107012 $25,055.08
Voided Warrant 107092 $ - 0 -
Payroll Liability
Warrants 107015 - 107110 $ 15601.45
Regular Warrants 107024 - 107110 $219555.79
Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register.
C. Consider Award of Bid for the Battery Back -Up System
(BBS) for City -Owned Signals. Staff Recommendation:
1) Approve the project plans and specifications for
purposes set forth in section F. of the agenda report;
and; 2) Award a contract to TDS Engineering in the
amount of $55,996.00
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 31
September 19, 2001
E. Consider Authorizing the Mayor to Sign Amended Tract
Map 5004. Staff Recommendation: 1) Direct the City
Engineer to certify the amended Final Map; 2)
Authorize the Mayor to execute the "Mayor's
Acknowledgement of Correction of City Council's
Certificate" and "Consent of Fee Owner(s) of Property
Affected" statements, and 3) authorize recordation of
the amended Final Map for Tract 5004.
G. Consider Resolution Adopting New Water Well Rates
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 270. Staff Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1896 revising fees for wells
and rescinding Resolution No. 2001 -1809.
The following items were pulled for individual
consideration:
D. Consider Park Improvement Project Status Report.
Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the report.
Councilmember Hillhouse requested that this item be
pulled for individual consideration to request a brief
update from the Director of Community Services of the
projects within the City.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Ms. Lindley
provided an update of the park improvements. She
indicated that the City is moving forward with the
City aquatics facility, and the restroom /concession
facility at Arroyo Vista Community Park. She
confirmed that the scheduled completion date for the
aquatics facility is Tune 2003.
F. Consider Resolution Establishing Miscellaneous City
Fees and Charges and Procedures for Annual Review and
Rescinding Resolution No. 98 -1506. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001-
Councilmember Mikos requested that this item be pulled
for individual consideration because she stated that
the charge of 25 cents per page for reproduction of
public documents is excessive.
Ms. Traffenstedt stated that staff is making every
effort to alleviate this cost to the public with more
convenience, but also with less cost. She stated that
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 32 September 19, 2001
the cost per page
increased in years.
of reproduction had not been
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to take this
item off calendar and for Councilmember Mikos to consult with
staff relative to city fees /costs for reproduction charges.
H. Consider Acceptance of Oak Tree Preservation Measures
as a Substitute for Additional Landscaping to Satisfy
Provisions of the Tre Preservation Ordinance for
Kavlico Industries Parking Lot Expansion at 14501 Los
Angeles Avenue (APN 513 -0- 010 -25) (Minor Mod No. 3 to
Development Plan No. 318). Staff Recommendation:
Approve the substitution of oak tree preservation
measures described in the agenda report as satisfying
Ordinance requirements for enhanced landscaping.
Councilmember Mikos requested that this item be pulled
for individual consideration. She requested of staff
what precautions are being taken to protect the
subject oak trees.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Loftus
explained that the conditions that were approved for
that parking lot did not include either provision for
bonding of the health of the oak trees nor an easement
to protect future oak trees.
After Council discussion the following motion was
heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse
seconded a motion to examine the conservation easement option.
The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
I. Consider Resolution Reaffirming City Hall Location,
Revising Regular Business Hours of City Offices, and
Rescinding Resolution No. 84 -138. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1897.
Councilmember Mikos requested that this item be pulled
for individual consideration to make the public aware
of the modified hours of operation of City Hall making
it public knowledge that City Hall will now be open at
8:00 a.m. instead of 8:30 a.m.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 33 September 19, 2001
MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Mayor Pro Tem Harper
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1897. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
J. Consider Report of Annual Review of Development
Agreement with Special Devices, Incorporated (SDI) in
Accordance with Section 15.40.150 of the Moorpark
Municipal Code. Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept the
Director of Community Development's Report and
recommendation that, on the basis of substantial
evidence, SDI has complied in good faith with the
terms and conditions of the agreement; and 2) Deem the
annual review process complete.
Councilmember Wozniak stated that the Council should
not support the lowering of the tree density on the
Caltrans right of way of this entrance into the City
as submitted in the staff report.
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Millhouse
seconded a motion to not reduce the density approach of
landscaping for the reforestation effort at the intersection of
New Los Angeles Avenue and State Route 23 as requested by
Caltrans. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
12. ORDINANCES:
None.
13. CLOSED SESSION:
Mr. Montes stated that the City Council would be going into
closed session for discussion of Item 13.A. (one case),
Item 13.B. (three cases), and Item 13.G.
Mr. Montes announced that the facts and circumstances
creating significant exposure to litigation, which facts
and circumstances are known to potential plaintiffs,
consist of issues discussed by staff and the developer
concerning implementation of the approved Development
Agreement with Archstone Communities.
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved
Millhouse seconded a motion to adjourn to
discussion of item 13.A. (one case), Item
and Item 13.G. on the agenda. The motion
voice vote. The time was 11:40 p.m.
and Councilmember
closed session for a
13.B. (three cases),
carried by unanimous
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 34 September 19, 2001
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to
Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government
Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 1)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number
of cases to be discussed - 3)
G. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City
Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative
Services, Director of Community Development, Director
of Community Services, and Director of Public Works.
Present in closed session were all Councilmembers; Steven
Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh
Riley, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Loftus, Director of
Community Development; Nancy Burns, Senior Management
Analyst and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk.
Ms. Burns left the meeting at 11:08 p.m.
The Council reconvened into open session at 11:40 p.m. Mr.
Kueny stated that one case under Item 13.A., two cases
under Item 13.B., and Item 13.G. were discussed and that
there was no action to report.
5. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 11:40 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California May 15, 2002
A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on May 15, 2002, in the Community Center of said City
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Pro Tem Mikos called the meeting to order at 6:02
p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse,
Wozniak and Mayor Hunter
Absent: Mayor Hunter (arrived at 6:12 p.m.)
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager; Barry Hogan,
Community Development Director; and Deborah
Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Approval of Third Amendment to Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release with Conejo Freeway
Properties and Simi - Moorpark Freeway Properties. Staff
Recommendation: Approve Third Amendment subject to
final language approval of City Attorney and City
Manager.
Mr. Kueny gave the staff report.
Brian Wolfe, P & R Architects, 111 W. Ocean Boulevard,
Laguna Beach, representing Zelman Retail Partners/
Zelman Development Company as the project architect,
discussed reasons for placement of the proposed pole
sign at the northeast corner of the project site. He
also discussed the proposed sign design and stated the
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2
Mav 15, 2002
intent was to create a three - dimensional look with
architectural lighting of design elements.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Mikos, Mr. Wolfe
explained the site topography as a reason why
placement of the freeway oriented pole sign at the
northeast corner of the property was preferred,
including that another location would increase the
height of the sign. He stated that they would request
Caltrans to permit a wrought iron fence near the
proposed pole sign.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Mikos, Robert Exel, Vice
President of Zelman Development Company, 515 South
Figueroa Street, Suite 1230, Los Angeles, explained
that the bottom panel of the pole sign would need to
be approximately at 39 feet in height so as to be
visible from State Route 23.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter arrived. The
time was 6:12 p.m.
Councilmember Harper asked if the words "City of
Moorpark" could be added to the sign.
Councilmember Millhouse stated he would prefer to not
have the City's name on the sign.
Mr. Kueny stated that the final design of the sign
would be approved with the Master Sign Program for the
Moorpark Marketplace Center.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Exel
explained the status of tenants. He stated that
Kohl's planned to break ground by August 1 and Target
plans to start construction in October. He discussed
restaurants that they were still pursuing including
In- and -Out, Home Town Buffet, Macaroni Grill and Olive
Garden.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Ben Reiling, President of
Zelman Development Company, 515 South Figueroa Street,
Suite 1230, Los Angeles, stated the pole sign was
needed to attract tenants based on less than desirable
demographic projections.
C "- -
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
May 15, 2002
Mayor Hunter stated that the level of signage
requested plus a one million dollars ($1,000,000)
reduction of air quality fees is not acceptable.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Brett Foy, representing
Zelman Development Company, stated that all Target
stores near freeways have freeway- oriented signage.
Mayor Hunter stated that there were no signs
comparable to what was requested anywhere along State
Route 23.
Councilmember Harper stated that he concurred with
Mayor Hunter, but also stated that the City needed
retail businesses and the sales tax that the
Marketplace Center would bring.
Mayor Hunter stated that he did not want to see the
proposed pole sign as the entry statement for the
City.
In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Reiling
stated that moving the sign closer to the buildings
would increase the sign height, because the slope
drops off approximately 25 feet from the northeast
corner. He also stated that signage is one of the key
elements to the success of a commercial center. Mr.
Wolfe stated that location and height of the pole sign
were tied together.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Mikos, Mr. Kueny
explained the air quality mitigation fee calculation.
He stated there were four options to consider for the
proposed amendment to the Settlement Agreement: 1)
approve the amendment, 2) approve the amendment with
changes, 3) don't approve, or 4) take no action.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the Third Amendment to
Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with Conejo Freeway
Properties and Simi - Moorpark Freeway Properties, subject to
final language approval of the City Attorney and City
Manager, with the maintenance obligation for the signage
and landscaping specified.
Mayor Pro Tem Mikos stated that her understanding of
the motion was that the Master Sign Program would
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4
May 15, 2002
still come back to the City Council for separate
approval, including final design of the pole sign at
the northeast corner of the Moorpark Marketplace site.
The motion carried by voice vote 3 -2, Mayor Hunter and
Councilmember Millhouse opposed.
5. CLOSED SESSION:
None was held.
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
A
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California May 22, 2002
A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on May 22, 2002, in the Community Center of said City
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 7 :50 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Wozniak and
Mayor Hunter
Absent: Councilmember Millhouse
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public
Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community
Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community
Development Director; Dana Shigley,
Administrative Services Director; Laura
Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; and
Deborah Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement
Budgets for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Staff
Recommendation: Discuss proposed budget for Fiscal
Year 2002/2003.
Mr. Kueny gave the staff report and summarized the budget
message report.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated that the
$20,000 budgeted for day laborers related purposes was
carried over from the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year. Mr. Riley
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2 May 22, 2002
gave a brief status report on the day laborers issue and
Catholic Charities office relocation.
Mayor Hunter recommended eliminating the $50,000 allocation
for open space acquisition until a more specific proposal
had been developed.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to
eliminate an allocation of $50,000 for open space acquisition.
In response to Mayor Hunter's question regarding funding
for photovoltaic improvements, Mr. Kueny suggested changing
$70,000 amount budgeted to $20,000 in 800 Fund to use to
fund a consultant and /or Planning Commission efforts to
develop standard condition(s) of approval for development
projects. Mr. Kueny also recommended funding the
photovoltaic study with Community Development funds.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to reduce
the allocation for alternate energy projects and research from
$70,000 to $20,000.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Captain LeMay discussed the
status of County of Ventura salary negotiations.
Mr. Kueny stated that approximately two - thirds of the
County's rate charged to City for Sheriff services is
usually for salary and benefits.
Captain LeMay confirmed that the big costs are for
salaries, benefits and vehicles.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Captain LeMay stated that
draft regulations intended to impose a City fee for towed
vehicles was sent to the City Attorney for review.
Mayor Hunter asked for staff follow -up on implementing a
City fee for towed vehicles.
In response to Mayor Hunter, discussion followed on
equipment replacement funding, City website improvements,
and dial -a -ride program.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to
increase funding for equipment maintenance by a total of $4,130.
��
4%41 r7,
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
Mav 22, 2002
In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Shigley provided a
revenues summary.
Discussion followed regarding the draft expenditures budget
for the City Council, City Manager /Assistant City Manager,
City Clerk's Department, City Attorney, Administrative
Services Department, and Community Development Department.
Ms. Lindley summarized the Community Services Department
budget.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that
funding was included for the Moorpark Symphony in the
Community Services Department budget.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Lindley discussed the
proposal to purchase new City marquee signs and the level
of animal control service provided over the past year. She
stated that no revenue from animal control citations had
been included in the draft budget, although the intent was
to achieve citation authority this next year upon
completion of training and Municipal Code revisions.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that
Municipal Code revisions necessary to provide citation
authority for animal control would receive priority for
completion.
In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley discussed
City paid security at the Metrolink station.
Councilmember Mikos discussed the need to increase VISTA
ridership to Moorpark College.
Ms. Lindley discussed proposed new bus shelters. She
summarized the success of the teen programs that had been
offered the past year.
Mr. Kueny discussed library funding and stated that the
City would not be affected by the State decrease in funding
for libraries unless the funding formula was changed.
Ms. Lindley discussed the parks maintenance assessment
district funding.
Mr. Gilbert summarized the Public Works Department budget.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4
Mav 22, 2002
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Gilbert stated money was
budgeted for an overlay project for Tierra Rejada Road.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Gilbert stated that
expenses for streetlights exceed revenues and that staff
would be recommending an increase in the assessment.
Captain LeMay discussed the Police budget, including
staffing and his proposal for a hybrid vehicle to be
purchased.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated staff would
meet with the School District regarding their participation
in funding of Middle School Resource Officer.
Mr. Kueny stated that the City's share of funding for the
Middle School Resource Officer should not exceed 40
percent. He also stated that the School District would
need to provide the City with notice prior to the date
specified in the City's contract with the County in order
to stop their funding participation for the DARE Program.
In response to Mayor Hunter, discussion followed regarding
funding for the Captain and Sergeant's Service Club dues.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to increase
funding of the Captain and Sergeant's Service Club dues by $650.
Mr. Kueny summarized the Capital budget.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the City Council determined to
schedule Budget adoption for June 5, 2002, with the changes as
noted to be incorporated.
B. Consider Proposed City Goals and Objectives for Fiscal
Year 2002/2003. Staff Recommendation: Discuss City
goals and objectives for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 with
recommended budget.
There was no discussion of this agenda item.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Paqe 5 May 22, 2002
5. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
1 4,--, �r � ", , . .
06/12/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 0100
- INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
0100
3751
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
M060102
6 /02COBPA VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE
010057100000 9225 JOHNSTON, MELODY N 06/01/02 1101
M060102 02 PENTAMATION CONFE 20 EXP REP 5/25 06/01/02 109618
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE
1 i
f y:
=t
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:01
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 06/01/02 53.80
0.00 0.00 53.80
0.00 06/01/02
0.00 0.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
53.80
53.80
174.87
174.87
174.87
174.87
228.67
228.67
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND-
UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
100021000000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
46.60
M060102
6/02C MGR VISION INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
46.60
100021000000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
8.13
M060102
6/02C MGR EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
8.13
100021000000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
3029.45
M060102
6 /02COERA MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
3029.45
100021000000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
151.86
M060102
6/02C MGR LTD & STD
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
151.86
TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK
AMT
3236.04
TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE
3236.04
100031000000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
24.70
M060102
6/02C CLERK VISION I
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
24.70
100031000000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
3.75
M060102
6/02 C CLERK EMP ASS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
3.75
100031000000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
1197.26
M060102
6/02C CLERK MEDICAL
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
1197.26
100031000000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
69.41
M060102
6/02C CLERK LTD & ST
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
69.41
TOTAL CITY CLERK
CHECK AMT
1295.12
TOTAL CITY CLERK
NET PAYABLE
1295.12
100031100000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
8.00
M060102
6 /02HR VISION INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
8.00
100031100000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2.50
M060102
6 /02HR EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
2.50
100031100000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
217.74
M060102
6 /02HR MEDICAL INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
217.74
Q031100000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 06/01/02 1101 0.00 06/01/02 21.82
_° (9° M060102 6 /02HR LTD & STD INS 20 JUNE 02 06/01/02 109621 0.00 0.00 21.82
.. RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:01 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
8T'ZS£Z
SL'8
SL'8
98'Sb
98'Sb
6T'9T9
6T'9T9
Z8' £b
Z8'£b
LT' 6b5
LT'6TS
OS'Z
OS'Z
OL'OZ
OL'OZ
L9'ZL9T
L9'ZL9T
OZ'99
OZ'99
ZT'TSST
ZT'TSST
OS'8
OS'8
S8 '9b
S8 '9b
90'OSZ
90'OSZ
ONIJNIIOJJV QNfld - NOIIVWVINHd
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
00'0 00'0
ZO /TO /90 00'0
TOTT
6T960T
TOTT
OZ960T
TOTT
TZ960T
TOTT
ZZ960T
TOTT
6T960T
TOTT
OZ960T
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
00'0
00'0
TZ960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
00'0
00'0
ZZ9601
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
00'0
00'0
GT960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO /10/90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
00'0
00'0
OZ960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
ZO:LO :ZT 3WIL ZO /ZL /90 2lJF70 NIIZf
N IJHZf HH7.07dWH JI7Hfld 0106 OOOOOTTSUtiO
�lj
ZOOZ HNflr OZ ISSFI dWH HJNvNI3Z0 /9 ZOi090Yd
N HHJ 'df102iJ NVW'IOH OT06 OOOOOTTSOOOT
ZO HNnr OZ I NOISIA HJN'dNIHZO /9 ZOT09OW
N HJNVdnSNI adI'I JIdJ OT06 OOOOOTTSOOOT
H'IaV7,Vd JHN (008) ZIHOKNVW SI 'IVLOI
JWK XDHHJ (008) 'dHJKNKW SI 'IVIOI
ZO HNfIr OZ QJS '3 QI'I HOW SIZO /9 ZOT09OW
N NVHnSNI NKII'IOdOHLHW OT06 tOOT00TS000T
ZO HNflr OZ NI rIVDIQHW NIWQdZO /9 Z0109OW
N IJad HHdO'IdW3 JI'IHfld OT06 bOOTOOTSOOOT
ZOOZ HNIIr OZ ISISSK dWH NINCIVU /9 ZOT09OW
N HHJ 'dfIOZIJ NKW'IOH OT06 b00T00TS000T
ZO HNflr OZ SKI NOISIA NIWCIVZO /9 ZOT090W
N HJNVdfISNI HAI7 JIdJ OT06 600TOOTS000T
H'IEVAVd LHN SHJIAZIHS HAIJVdJSINIWCIV 'IVIOJ
IWV XDHHJ SHJIAZIHS HAIIK2IISINIWClV 'IVIOJ
ZO HNnf OZ QJS 39 OI7 NIWQKZO /9 ZOT09OW
N NViMSNI NKJI'IOdOHJHW OT06 OOOOOOTSOOOT
ZO HNnf OZ NI 'IVDIQHW NIWCIVZO /9 ZOT09OW
N IJHZI HH)WIdWH JI'IEnd OT06 OOOOOOTSOOOT
ZOOZ HNnr OZ ISISSFI dWH NIWQKZO /9 ZOT09OW
N HHI 'dnOZIO NKW'IOH OT06 OOOOOOTSOOOT
ZO HMnf OZ SKI NOISIA NIWCVZ0/9 ZOT09OW
N HJNVdnSNI HdI7 JIdJ 0106 OOOOOOTSOOOT
ariav7,vd IHN SHO'dnOSHdI NVWIIH 7FII0J
JWK XDEHJ SaDUnOSHdf NKWIIH 'IKJOJ
H7HFi CKd JHN JWK JSIQ XKI HSf1 ON ?IJHHJ INIIOJJ7 HJ'IQ XHJ HJIOANI J/J
IWK XJHHJ HIKQ JSIQ XVL SH7KS IOOFI HSVZ) wvdE)Odid IJvSKvdi, HQZIO HSKHMMd 660T
£ HOKd
AIIAIIJFI XDHHJ 7FiflNVW
KJ 'XHVd'dOOW 30 dJIJ
NOIIdRIJSHQ 70'dLNOJ
ZfOQNHA INfIOJJF7 LINn JH`JQRH
QHIJIZLLS um -QNna WdENHO - OOOT - QNEM
TO /ZT :OOIZIHd JNIJNIIOJJFI
ZO /ZT /90
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND-
UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
M060102
6 /02FINANCE MEDICAL
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
2352.18
100051100000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
107.28
M060102
6 /02FINANCE LTD & ST
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
107.28
TOTAL FINANCE
CHECK AMT
2514.07
TOTAL FINANCE
NET PAYABLE
2514.07
100071000000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
4.50
M060102
6 /02COPM9 SRV VISION
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
4.50
100071000000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2.26
M060102
6 /02COMM SRVC EMP AS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
2.26
100071000000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
301.04
M060102
6 /02COMM SRVC MEDICA
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
301.04
100071000000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
32.80
M060102
6 /02COMM SRVC LTD &
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
32.80
TOTAL COMMUNITY
SERVICES
CHECK AMT
340.60
TOTAL COMMUNITY
SERVICES
NET PAYABLE
340.60
100075200000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
41.40
M060102
6 /02VECTOR VISION IN
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
41.40
100075200000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
5.00
M060102
6 /02VECTOR EMP ASSIS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
5.00
100075200000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
1101.48
M060102
6 /02VECTOR MEDICAL I
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
1101.48
100075200000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
45.39
M060102
6 /02VECTOR LTD & STD
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
45.39
TOTAL VECTOR
CONTROL CHECK
AMT
1193.27
TOTAL VECTOR
CONTROL NET
PAYABLE
1193.27
100076100000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
15.90
M060102
6 /02SR CTR VISION IN
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
15.90
RUN
DATE 06/12/02
TIME 12:07:02
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
ks.
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
100076100000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2.50
M060102
6 /02SR CTR EMP ASSIS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
2.50
100076100000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
902.49
M060102
6 /02SR CTR MEDICAL I
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
902.49
100076100000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
20.75
M060102
6 /02SR CTR LTD & STD
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
20.75
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER CHECK
AMT
941.64
TOTAL SENIOR
CENTER NET
PAYABLE
941.64
100076200000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
31.05
M060102
6 /02COMM FAC VISION
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
31.05
100076200000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
3.76
M060102
6 /02COMM FAC EMP ASS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
3.76
100076200000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
945.92
M060102
6 /02COMM FAC MEDICAL
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
945.92
100076200000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
32.15
M060102
6 /02COMM FAC LTD & S
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
32.15
TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES
CHECK AMT
1012.88
TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES
NET PAYABLE
1012.88
100076300000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
22.00
M060102
6 /02RECREATION VISIO
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
22.00
100076300000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
5.00
M060102
6 /02RECRF-ATION EMP A
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
5.00
100076300000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
873.70
M060102
6 /02RECREATION MEDIC
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
873.70
100076300000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
49.23
M060102
6 /02RECREATION LTD &
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
49.23
TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM
CHECK AMT
949.93
loftkL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE
949.93
( =i
-'a RUN
DATE 06/12/02
TIME 12:07:03
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
C;
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
100076301007
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
8.00
M060102
6 /02TEEN COORD VISIO
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
8.00
100076301007
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
217.74
M060102
6 /02TEEN COORD MEDIC
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
217.74
100076301007
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
15.44
M060102
6 /02TEEN COORD LTD &
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
15.44
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800)
CHECK AMT
241.18
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800)
NET PAYABLE
241.18
100081000000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
10.55
M060102
6 /02PW VISION INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
10.55
100081000000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2.50
M060102
6 /02PW EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
2.50
100081000000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
337.23
M060102
6 /02PW MEDICAL INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
337.23
100081000000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
18.63
M060102
6 /02PW LTD & STD INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
18.63
TOTAL PUBLIC
WORKS CHECK AMT
368.91
TOTAL PUBLIC
WORKS NET PAYABLE
368.91
100081001003
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
1.93
M060102
6 /02PW EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
1.93
TOTAL PW /CS ANALYST (800)
CHECK AMT
1.93
TOTAL PW /CS ANALYST (800)
NET PAYABLE
1.93
100083200000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
0.56
M060102
6 /02NPDES VISION INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
0.56
100083200000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
0.10
M060102
6 /02NPDES EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
0.10
100083200000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
20.02
M060102
6 /02NPDES MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
20.02
f
RUN
DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:03
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
f
Ni
06/12/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND-
UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
100083200000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
1.23
M060102
6 /02NPDES LTD &
STD 20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
1.23
TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT
TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
C-1
f
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:03
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
21.91
21.91
14656.40
14656.40
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2000 -
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
200082100000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02CROSS GUARD VISI
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
200082100000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M06O102
6 /02CROSS GUARD EMP
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
200082100000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02CROSS GUARD MEDI
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
200082100000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02CROSS GUARD LTD
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL CROSSING
GUARDS CHECK AMT
TOTAL CROSSING
GUARDS NET
PAYABLE
200083300000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PRKNG ENF VISION
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
200083300000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M06O102
6 /02PRKNG ENF EMP AS
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
200083300000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PRKNG ENF MEDICA
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
200083300000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PRKNG ENF LTD &
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PARKING
ENFORCEMENT
CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARKING
ENFORCEMENT
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL TRAFFIC
SAFETY FUND
CHECK AMT
TOTAL TRAFFIC
SAFETY FUND
NET PAYABLE
F
PAGE 8
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
5.75
5.75
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:04 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
E 9
`i, 'v
0.73
0.73
182.57
182.57
5.71
5.71
194.76
194.76
15.24
15.24
2.49
2.49
546.11
546.11
21.24
21.24
585.08
585.08
779.84
779.84
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
220061000000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
21.90
M060102
6 /02C0MM DEV VISION
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
21.90
220061000000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
4.38
M060102
6 /02COMM DEV EMP ASS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
4.38
220061000000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
1190.67
M060102
6 /02C0MM DEV MEDICAL
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
1190.67
220061000000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
61.05
M060102
6 /02COMM DEV LTD & S
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
61.05
TOTAL COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
1278.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
NET PAYABLE
1278.00
220064300000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
24.25
M060102
6 /02CEO VISION INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
24.25
220064300000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
3.87
M060102
6 /02CEO EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
3.87
220064300000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
644.87
M060102
6 /02CEO MEDICAL INS
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
644.87
220064300000
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
66.86
M060102
6 /02CEO LTD & STD IN
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
66.86
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK
AMT
739.85
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET
PAYABLE
739.85
220064400000
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
70.96
M060102
6 /02PLANNING VISION
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
70.96
220064400000
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
15.51
M060102
6 /02PLANNING EMP ASS
20
JUNE
2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
15.51
220064400000
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2144.21
M060102
6 /02PLANNING MEDICAL
20
JUNE
02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
2144.21
21064400000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN N 06/01/02 1101 0.00 06/01/02 110.56
<=a. M060102 6 /02PLANNING LTD & S 20 JUNE 02 06/01/02 109621 0.00 0.00 110.56
T
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:04 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
jOa�v
06/12/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT
TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
n
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:05
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
PAGE 10
1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
2341.24
2341.24
4359.09
4359.09
06/12/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND — 2201 — CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
220124300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02AFF HOUSE VISION
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
220124300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02AFF HOUSE EMP AS
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
220124300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02AFF HOUSE MEDICA
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
220124300000 9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02AFF HOUSE LTD &
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING NET PAYABLE
e
-i RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:05
PAGE 11
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
1.20
1.20
PENTAMATION — FUND ACCOUNTING
0.37
0.37
32.66
32.66
4.74
4.74
38.97
38.97
38.97
38.97
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2300 -
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
230079007901
9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6/02AD842 VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
230079007901
9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6/02AD842 EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
230079007901
9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6/02AD842 MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
230079007901
9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6/02AD842 LTD & STD
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL AD 84 -2
CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2
CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL AD 84 -2
CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL AD 84 -2
CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:05
PAGE 12
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
7.25
7.25
0.86
0.86
202.34
202.34
9.79
9.79
220.24
220.24
220.24
220.24
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
240078000000 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
240078000000 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
240078000000 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
240078000000 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS LTD & STD
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE
240078001001 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
240078001001 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
240078001001 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
240078001001 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02PARKS LTD & STD
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER
(800) CHECK AMT
TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER
(800) NET PAYABLE
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE
(Ib',
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:06
PAGE 13
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
47.00
47.00
6.64
6.64
1451.72
1451.72
68.37
68.37
1573.73
1573.73
20.70
20.70
2.50
2.50
566.14
566.14
14.70
14.70
604.04
604.04
2177.77
2177.77
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
260583100000 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02ST MAINT VISION
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
260583100000 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02ST MAINT EMP ASS
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
260583100000 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02ST MAINT MEDICAL
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
260583100000 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02ST MAINT LTD & S
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
CHECK AMT
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
NET PAYABLE
260589008902 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6/02ADS42 VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
260589008902 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6/02AD842 EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
260589008902 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6/02AD842 MEDICAL IN
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
260589008902 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6/02AD842 LTD & STD
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT
TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE
`r�
!/ 7
l
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:06
`s
PAGE 14
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
60.11
60.11
12.08
12.08
1960.18
1960.18
135.57
135.57
2167.94
2167.94
1.19
1.19
0.17
0.17
41.54
41.54
2.85
2.85
45.75
45.75
2213.69
2213.69
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 1S
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2701 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
270124400000 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
2.00
M060102
6 /02CDBG VISION INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
2.00
270124400000 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
0.63
M060102
6 /02CDBG EMP ASSIST
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
0.63
270124400000 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
54.44
M060102
6 /02CDBG MEDICAL INS
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
54.44
270124400000 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
7.89
M060102
6 /02CDBG LTD & STD I
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
7.89
TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT
64.96
TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE
64.96
TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT
64.96
TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE
64.96
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:06
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
JNLLNnoDDv QNnd - NOIIKWtIINEd
90:LO:ZT EWII ZO /ZT /90 E.LVCI NnZI r
96 505
3'IHV7,Vd IEN ONI /ESnOH DNI GOW /MO'I VdW 'IVJOI
96' 505
JAV XDaHJ ONI /ESnOH DNI GOW /MO'I VHW TdZOL
96' 505
E'IHKI.FId ,LEN ONISROH VdW 'IKIOI
96'505
IWV xOEHO DMISnOH VUH 'IFIIOI
80'TE
00'0
00'0
TZ960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO ENRP
Or
NI GIS '9 QJlI V-dWZO /9 ZOT090W
80'T£
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
N
NVIMSNI NVII'IOdO'dJHW OT06 OOOOOZ5ZT06Z
55'LS£
00'0
00'0
ZZ960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO ENRP
OZ
SNI 'TdoIGEW v-dwZ0 /9 ZOT090W
55'L5£
ZO /T0/90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
N
IIE2I EExO'TdWE OI'IEnd OT06 OOOOOZ5ZT06Z
5L'S
00'0
00'0
6T960T
ZO /TO /90
ZOOZ ENRP
OZ
ISISSV dWE V&gZO /9 ZOT090W
5L 'S
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
Z0/T0/90
N
EHI 'dnO2io NVW'IOH OT06 OOOOOZ5ZT06Z
OL'TT
00'0
00'0
OZ960T
ZO /TO /90
ZO ENRP
OZ
SNI NOISIA V- dWZO /9 ZOT090W
OL'TT
ZO /TO /90
00'0
TOTT
ZO /TO /90
N
EoNvHnsNI EdI'I OIdJ O106 OOOOOZ5ZT06Z
E'IEIV7.Vd IEN
J.WK DSIG
XKI ESn
ON XDHHO
INROOOK EJ.K(J XHO
EOIOANI
0 /J.
NOIIdIdDSEQ 'IO'dLNOO
IWV )IJEHO
Elva oSIQ
X7I SE'TKS
IDDV HSYJ
WVdDO'dd IDVSNVHI EGHO ESKHDUnd
660T
dociNEA INRODDV LiNa immaH
ONI /ESROH DNI GOW /MO'I VdW - T06Z - (INRE
IIIAIIJd XOEHO
gVnNVW
TO /ZT :QOIUSd OXIINRODDV
9T HE)Vd
VD 'X- dVd2IOOW
30 xIIO
ZO /ZT /90
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND — 2902 — MRA AREA 1
—INCR & OTHER
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
290224100000 9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02MRA /ECO VISION I
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
290224100000 9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02MRA /ECO EMP ASSI
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
290224100000 9223
MMASC
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
HERNANDEZ —CONF REGIS
20
7/10 -12/02
06/07/02
109623
0.00
0.00
290224100000 9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02MRA /ECO MEDICAL
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
290224100000 9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M06O102
6 /02MRA /EC0 LTD & ST
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA AREA 1 —INCR &
OTHER CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA AREA 1 —INCR &
OTHER NET PAYABLE
s.
i
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:07
PAGE 17
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
37.60
37.60
PENTAMATION — FUND ACCOUNTING
8.87
8.87
200.00
200.00
729.67
729.67
45.96
45.96
1022.10
1022.10
1022.10
1022.10
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 5000
- LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
500073100000
9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M06O102 6 /02PUB TRANS VISION
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
500073100000
9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02PUB TRANS EMP AS
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
500073100000
9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M06O102 6 /02PUB TRANS MEDICA
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
500073100000
9010 METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102 6 /02PUB TRANS LTD &
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PUBLIC
TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL PUBLIC
TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOCAL
TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOCAL
TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE
F
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:07
PAGE 18
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
2.69
2.69
1.11
1.11
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
168.05
168.05
17.99
17.99
189.84
189.84
189.84
189.84
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 5001
- SOLID WASTE AB939
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
500175307501
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST VISION I
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
500175307501
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST EMP ASSI
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
500175307501
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST MEDICAL
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
500175307501
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST LTD & ST
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL USED OIL
GRANT CHECK AMT
TOTAL USED OIL
GRANT NET
PAYABLE
500175307502
9010
CPIC LIFE INSURANCE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST VISION I
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109620
0.00
0.00
500175307502
9010
HOLMAN GROUP, THE
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST EMP ASSI
20
JUNE 2002
06/01/02
109619
0.00
0.00
500175307502
9010
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST MEDICAL
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109622
0.00
0.00
500175307502
9010
METROPOLITAN INSURAN
N
06/01/02
1101
0.00
06/01/02
M060102
6 /02SLD WST LTD & ST
20
JUNE 02
06/01/02
109621
0.00
0.00
TOTAL A13939
CHECK AMT
TOTAL AB939
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL SOLID
WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT
TOTAL SOLID
WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT
CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT
NET PAYABLE
f
is
PAGE 19
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.80
0.80
? RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 12:07:07 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
�
a-
,. ->
0.25
0.25
45.12
45.12
3.92
3.92
50.09
50.09
7.49
7.49
2.62
2.62
438.76
438.76
50.88
50.88
499.75
499.75
549.84
549.84
26906.37
26906.37
06/12/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
FUND - 0100 -
INTERNAL SERVICES
FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
010057000000
9231
CITY OF MOORPARK
M061102
KUENY - POSTAGE
TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES CHECK AMT
TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES NET PAYABLE
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE
ai
6
r �
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:48
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
N 06/11/02 1101
20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02 109635
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 06/11/02 0.23
0.00 0.00 0.23
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
06/12/02
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
06/11/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
0.00
0.00
20.27
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
40.10
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
40.10
0.00
06/11/02
47.53
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
0.00
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
100011000000
9225
CITY
OF MOORPARK
N
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
1101
0.00
M061102
CITY
COUNCIL DINNER
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
100011000000
9205
CITY
OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
06/11/02
1101
20
M061102
CITY
COUNCIL DINNER
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
100011000000
9205
CITY
OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
CITY
COUNCIL DINNER
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
100011000000
9205
CITY
OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
CROP
WALK WATER
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL CHECK
AMT
TOTAL CITY COUNCIL NET PAYABLE
100021000000
9225
CITY
OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
H RILEY - SEMINAR PRKN 20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
PAGE 2
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
06/11/02
20.27
0.00
0.00
20.27
0.00
06/11/02
40.10
0.00
0.00
40.10
0.00
06/11/02
47.53
0.00
0.00
47.53
0.00
06/11/02
26.36
0.00
0.00
26.36
100031100000
9236
134.26
N
0.00
134.26
M061102
HARTNETT -DMV REPORT
134.26
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
134.26
0.00
06/11/02
5.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE
100022100000 9225 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02 1101 0.00 06/11/02
M061102 CHUDOBA EMRGNCY SRVC 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02 109635 0.00 0.00
TOTAL EMERGENCY SERVICES CHECK AMT
TOTAL EMERGENCY SERVICES NET PAYABLE
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
109635
M061102
DMV REPORT
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
0.00
M061102
DMV REPORTS
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
WOLFE -DMV REPORT
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
06/11/02
M061102
HARTNETT -DMV REPORT
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
109635
M061102
MCKINLEY DMV REPORT
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
0.00
0.00
M061102
HOGAN,PETERSON -DMV R
20
4/29- 6/7/02
100031100000
9236
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
M061102
DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT
20
4/29- 6/7/02
;j
RUN DATE 06/12/02
TIME 14:46:48
r
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
5.00
5.00
26.64
26.64
26.64
26.64
5.00
5.00
15.00
15.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
10.00
10.00
5.31
5.31
06/12/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE
100072100000 9222 TRAN, LOC H N 06/11/02
M061102 6 /12- 14NACA CONF PER 20 6/15 EXP REP 06/11/02
TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL CHECK AMT
TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL NET PAYABLE
100075200000 9204 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 VECTOR DRY ICE 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT
TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE
100076100000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 SR CTR NWSLTR CLOSUR 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE
100076107619 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 SR CTR B -DAYS & PRIZ 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
100076107619 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 SR CTR FILM DEVELOPM 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP CHECK AMT
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP NET PAYABLE
100076300000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 YOUTH OF THE YEAR LU 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT
TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE
100076301007 9243 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02
M061102 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
'PTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) CHECK AMT
y RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49
1101 0.00 06/11/02
109632 0.00 0.00
1101 0.00 06/11/02
109635 0.00 0.00
1101 0.00 06/11/02
109635 0.00 0.00
1101
0.00
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
1101
0.00
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
1101 0.00 06/11/02
109635 0.00 0.00
1101 0.00 06/11/02
109635 0.00 0.00
PAGE 3
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
50.31
50.31
50.31
50.31
158.26
158.26
158.26
158.26
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
16.06
16.06
16.06
16.06
41.80
41.80
16.07
16.07
57.87
57.87
57.87
57.87
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
06/12/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
PAGE 4
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
50.00
100076307603 9171 CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
7.00
M061102 SHAW -CMP MPK PRKNG E
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
7.00
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS CHECK AMT
7.00
TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE
7.00
100076307608 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
35.48
M061102 SHAW RECREATION BOOK
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
35.48
TOTAL CAMP MOORPARK CHECK AMT
TOTAL CAMP MOORPARK NET PAYABLE
100076307609 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N 06/11/02 1101 0.00 06/11/02
M061102 SKATEPARK CONTEST 20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02 109635 0.00 0.00
TOTAL SPRING CAMP CHECK AMT
TOTAL SPRING CAMP NET PAYABLE
100092000000 9223 VENTURA COUNTY DISTR N 06/11/02 1101 0.00 06/11/02
M061102 6 /17- 21PARENT PROJ T 20 DEP MANORY 06/11/02 109633 0.00 0.00
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES CHECK AMT
TOTAL POLICE SERVICES NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
35.48
35.48
-0.81
-0.81
-0.81
-0.81
120.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
690.07
690.07
06/12/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2400 -
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
240078000000
9254
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
M061102
CEJA -PRKS TRUCK SUPP
20
4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
109635
0.00
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE
a`
g .4
�.9
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49
PAGE 5
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
06/11/02 5.34
0.00 5.34
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
5.34
5.34
5.34
5.34
06/12/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2501
- LOS ANGELES
A.O.C.
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
2501
2102
SECURITY PAVING,
INC N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
M061102
NEW LA AVE BRIDGE
RE 20
RETENTION 06/11/02
109634
0.00
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE
ar
e 5
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49
PAGE 6
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
06/11/02 169497.21
0.00 169497.21
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
169497.21
169497.21
169497.21
169497.21
06/12/02
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
DISC AMT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
0.00
06/11/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
0.00
FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX
11.82
0.00
06/11/02
5.00
0.00
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
260583100000 9231
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
HUTCHINSON POSTAGE
F 20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
260583100000 9222
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
MCBRIDE - TRAINING SEM 20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
CHECK AMT
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT
TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE
r T.
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49
PAGE 7
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
06/11/02
11.82
0.00
0.00
11.82
0.00
06/11/02
5.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
16.82
16.82
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
16.82
16.82
16.82
16.82
06/12/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
06/11/02
1101
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
06/11/02
FUND - 2901
- MRA LOW /MOD
INC HOUSE /INC
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE
TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
290124200000
9205
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
M061102
BURNS MMASC LUNCH &
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE
290124202001 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M061102 MPK MOBILEHOME PRK R 20 4/29- 6/7/02
290124202001 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N
M061102 MPK MOBILEHOME PRK R 20 4/29- 6/7/02
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE
\ r
G l
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:49
PAGE 8
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 06/11/02 19.00
0.00 0.00 19.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
06/11/02
1101
0.00
06/11/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
0.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
19.00
19.00
6.41
6.41
26.03
26.03
32.44
32.44
32.44
32.44
51.44
51.44
06/12/02
CITY OF
MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
MANUAL
CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2902
- MRA AREA 1 -INCR
& OTHER
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
290224100000
9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
M061102
HERNANDEZ -MMASC LUNC
20
4/29- 6/7/02
06/11/02
109635
0.00
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA AREA 1-INCR. & OTHER CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE
r sv
16
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:50
PAGE 9
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
06/11/02 15.00
0.00 15.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
06/12/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 5000 -
LOCAL TRANSIT
PROGRAMS 8C
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
500073100000
9223
CITY OF MOORPARK
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
M061102
BRAND MTG REFRESHMEN
20
4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02
109635
0.00
TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT
TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT
TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE
is
C J
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:50
PAGE 10
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
06/11/02 22.65
0.00 22.65
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
22.65
22.65
22.65
22.65
06/12/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
FUND - 5001 -
SOLID WASTE
AB939
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
500175307502
9225
CITY OF MOORPARK
M061102
TRANSPORT TO BW &S
TOTAL AB939 CHECK AMT
TOTAL AB939 NET PAYABLE
TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT
TOTAL SOLID WASTE AE939 NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
t r
ci
�
l �
RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 14:46:50
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
N 06/11/02 1101
20 4/29- 6/7/02 06/11/02 109635
PAGE 11
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 06/11/02 14.35
0.00 0.00 14.35
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
14.35
14.35
14.35
14.35
170313.11
170313.11
06/11/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2200 -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
220064300000
9222
FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
N
06/11/02
1101
0.00
04/30/02
- 129.00
AP052902
M RILEY -5/2 SELF -DIS
20
6049160
05/29/02
109529 V
0.00
0.00
- 129.00
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT - 129.00
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE - 129.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT - 129.00
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE - 129.00
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT - 129.00
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE - 129.00
f
J
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 17:01:25
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/12/02
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/01
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
100076200000
9204
DATA BYTE CENTRAL IN
N
06/12/02
1101
AP061202
COM CTR MAINTENANCE
20
366571
06/12/02
109647 V
TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES NET PAYABLE
100076207701 9204 DATA BYTE CENTRAL IN N 06/12/02 1101
AP061202 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUP 20 388702 06/12/02 109647 V
TOTAL ARROYO VISTA COMM. CENTER CHECK AMT
TOTAL ARROYO VISTA COMM. CENTER NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
4.
c
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 05/30/02 -64.52
0.00 0.00 -64.52
-64.52
-64.52
0.00 06/04/02 -34.32
0.00 0.00 -34.32
h.-, RUN DATE 06/12/02 TIME 11:05:37 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
-34.32
-34.32
-98.84
-98.84
-98.84
-98.84
06/05/02
AMOUNT
CANCER INSURANCE
114.32
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
12/01
3,601.56
CHECK REGISTER
335.50
FUND
- 1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
118.00
ID #9600616061
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109624
1101
06/07/02
2335
AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN
2299
109625
1101
06/07/02
1886
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457
2210
109625
1101
06/07/02
1886
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457
2210
TOTAL CHECK
109626
1101
06/07/02
1888
S E I U LOCAL 998
2208
109627
1101
06/07/02
1891
SANDRA KUENY
2299
109628
1101
06/07/02
1889
UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU
2207
109629
1101
06/07/02
1890
VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A
2299
109630
1101
06/07/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
109630
1101
06/07/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
TOTAL CHECK
109631
1101
06/07/02
1887
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F
2210
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL
REPORT
A
RUN DATE 06/05/02 TIME 12:08:11
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
CANCER INSURANCE
114.32
F/T REG DEFER COMP
998.24
F/T REG DEFER COMP
2,603.32
3,601.56
UNION DUES
335.50
CASE #SD020444
2,172.50
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
118.00
ID #9600616061
168.46
F/T REG DEFER COMP
3,610.39
F/T REG DEFER COMP
1,481.53
5,091.92
P/T REG DEFER COMP
476.64
12,078.90
12,078.90
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/05/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND FUND TITLE
1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
TOTAL REPORT
AMOUNT
12,078.90
12,078.90
yip PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
RUN DATE 06/05/02 TIME 12:08:14
06/11/02
AMOUNT
SZABO -WEEK END 5/24 -36HRS
610.00
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
12/01
58.02
CHECK REGISTER
5.76
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
15.66
6 /02MRA PAGER
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR - - - -- -
ACCT
109636
1101
06/12/02
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
109637
1101
06/12/02
1027
AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL
9221
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
109638
1101
06/12/02
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
TOTAL CHECK
109639
1101
06/12/02
1067
BOGOYEVAC, PETE
9244
109640
1101
06/12/02
3167
BUCKA. MEGAN
9244
109641
1101
06/12/02
2421
C.A.C.E.
9221
109642
1101
06/12/02
1788
CANTWELL, ALICE A
9160
109643
1101
06/12/02
3169
CARR, BRUCE
9222
109644
1101
06/12/02
2873
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
9102
109645
1101
06/12/02
2666
CROOKE, TIMOTHY SCOTT
9244
109646
1101
06/12/02
1167
D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED
9020
109647
1101
06/12/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9204
109647
1101
06/12/02
1172
DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC
9204
TOTAL CHECK
109648
1101
06/12/02
1802
DEWBERRY, EUGENE DOC
9243
109649
1101
06/12/02
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9104
109649
1101
06/12/02
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9104
109649
1101
06/12/02
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9104
109649
1101
06/12/02
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9104
109649
1101
06/12/02
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9104
TOTAL CHECK
109650 ,.
1101
06/12/02
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
F .
109651 :a
1101
06/12/02
2603
DOROJINSKI, VLADIMIR
9102
109652 (r�.
gyp,
1101
06/12/02
1212
ENGRAVING WIZARD
9205
109653
1101
06/12/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2733
109653
1101
06/12/02
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9103
TOTAL CHECK
RUN DATE
06/11/02 TIME 16:26:15
PAGE 1
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
SZABO -WEEK END 5/24 -36HRS
610.00
VECTOR -02/03 MEMBERSHIP
100.00
6 /02REC PAGERS
-14.38
6/02C MGR PAGERS
58.02
6/02C CLERK PAGER
5.76
6 /02COMM SRVC PAGER
5.76
6 /02PARKS PAGER
15.66
6 /02MRA PAGER
4.33
6 /02EMERGENCY SRVCS PAGER
3.86
6 /02PUBLIC WORKS PAGER
15.38
6 /02PRKNG ENF PAGER
5.29
6 /02CITY COUNCIL PAGERS
55.82
6 /02FACILITIES PAGER
5.29
6 /02COMM DEV PAGER
12.76
173.55
SOFTBALL UMPIRES FEE
271.50
JBL OFFICIAL
90.00
02 MEMBERSHIP DUES
40.00
AWAY WE GROW EXTENDED DAY
75.00
5 /17 -AVRC 11 EMPLOYEES
550.00
SPACE #19 CLOSING COSTS
426.00
JBL OFFICIAL
90.00
AVRC STAFF HATS
532.69
COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL
64.52
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
98.84
MASTER OF CEREMONY SRVCS
600.00
5 /02SHADYRIDGE BUFFER PAT
180.00
3 /02AVCP PATROL SERVICE
180.00
4 /02AVCP PATROL SERVICE
180.00
4 /02SHADYRIDGE BUFFER PAT
180.00
5 /02AVCP PATROL SERVICES
180.00
900.00
5/13 &28 COMPENSATION MTG
200.00
5 /02SR CTR STRENGTH TRAIN
111.00
CERVANTES,SCZEPAN PLATES
22.52
BOBARDT TO BONTERRA CONS
15.15
WILLIAMS TO BW &S
11.22
26.37
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
ONIINnOJJFI aNnH - NOIIKWKIN3d
a IIS, ZO /TT /90 SLVG Nn2i
08'LZL
XDSHJ
rIKIOL
08'952
2IIdd32I HE rIrIVH xLIJ
£OT6
JNI ONIHWn'Id EHIOO-d UW
00'OSE
dnXDVa USMHS 3NIrI NIHW
ZSZ6
JNI ONIBWn'Id II3IOO2i 2M
00'TZT
2IIVdS-d dd )RId rPTIH HJd
EOT6
JNI JNIHWIIrld 2aJ,00'I HK
00'OSb
rIVINad 'dLD WWOJ- aNnd32i
TT9Z
0I2IHSO'd 'S3rIVH0W
SE'6
HSKW )MrI HOIJ3A
TOZ6
)JIddnS 3 a33d X- dVd'd00W
bZ'8L
ZLTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
ZT' 9E
2I3,L'IId 3 rIIO 9Z# XDfI-dL
bSZ6
9L XHVCT-tOOW
ZT' Zb
dai'IId 3 rIIO 8T# XJndL
VSZ6
9L XRIVdHOOW
89'60Z
TOTT
u ;
bL960T
8Z'LET
rIVIN32i LINn aDVd0ISZO /9
EOT6
'JNI 'INIW HrIIHOW
Of "ZL
rIVINEM dWV-dHLVXSOZ /9 -bZ /S
EO16
'JNI 'INIW 3rII8:0W
00'OZ
riviDiddO rIHP
"Z6
GVHJ 'NKHaRW
9 5'0 i
2JIddnS rIIACrV rPIKH MID
SOZ6
)JIddnS -ddVZ)- 2I3LSKWJW
00'Ob
rItIIJIddO rIEr
6bZ6
NOSxI 'HSOINIJW
00'06T
WHIG 2I3d dNOJ HdVGSZ -TZ /L
SZZ6
dd3P dlfldHa '7.?IONVW
00'OOZ
3JNVM0aHSd ISI,LdV HJL3)IS
5bZ6
NI J,daJ.N3 CIaIHVA 3 JISVW
80'ZE
xJKH AIIH OIGFid
TSZ6
DdHSOU 'SKOnrI
00'06T
WHIG 'dad dNOJ adVG5Z -TZ /L
SZZ6
WII xlnd3(I 'NKWHOrI
00'SOT
S3na X-dVJO-dZO /S -E
TZZ6
L2I38O-d NIVLdVD '.WW3rI
EO'T6Z
NKWH0rI'X-d0NKW-SN0J 32Ria
SZZ6
NOIrIIH SVE)SA SVI
00'OOT
JIW NOILVSN3dWOJET /S
T006
V ddIX 'SIGNVq
T9'L6T
EIVdald XrIVM3GIS SLdaHOd
OTE6
'JNI 'XIW xaK3?I L2M XIM)I
00'OZb
S3JIA-daS INKIMSNOJ HHUI
ZOT6
'2I NHOP '2I3'IS23X
00'OOT
SGNnd- NOI,LvkjHIdNOJ ,LIGnFP
EOT6
HIKLS iriaNNOD.0 N33rIHI'dx
00'SZE
NOIIJFRIIIV IN3AH NdaL8Z /9
55Z6
JNI SdWIIr 2JIrI0P
SS' EZE
SdIKdHd ZE# SI1H XIIJ
ZOT6
damaD 3JIAUSS rIVI-dLSnaNI
00'8b8
5'9960T
9LTE
ZO /ZT /90
09'ObT
SHIrlddnS JNINVYIJ DVa WOJ
TOZ6
ArlddnS XUVIINKS 3Sn0H
OVLOL
SHIrlddnS JNINK3rIJ Z)Vd WOJ
bOZ6
xrlddnS XdVLINKS 3Sn0H
L4'89Z
rIVINEd HHEMI Md
TTZ6
J 'rIVINH -d LN3WdIn03 ZJ.HHH
00' OOT
DIN NOIJ.VSNddWOJ ET /S
T006
'InVd '2I3rIrIVH
INnOWFI ------- NOIIdrusaa-------
Z HSVd
ST :9Z:9T
a IIS, ZO /TT /90 SLVG Nn2i
XDSHJ
rIKIOL
96ET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
9L960T
96ET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
9L960T
96ET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
9L960T
ZLTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
SL960T
1
L8ET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
u ;
bL960T
)IJ3HJ
rIVL0,L
b85Z
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
"•.)
EL960T
i85Z
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
EL960T
XDHHJ
rIKIOI
OSLT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
ZL960T
OSLT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
ZL960T
8992
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
TL960T
99ET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
OL960T
bSTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
69960T
9ZLZ
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
89960T
ELTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
L9960T
TLT£
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
99960T
TOLZ
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
S9960T
8LLZ
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
5'9960T
9LTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
£9960T
6ZET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
Z9960T
8L8Z
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
T9960T
OLTE
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
09960T
ZZTZ
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
6S960T
ZTET
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
SS960T
E66Z
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
LS960T
)IJ3HJ
rIV10I
98ZT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
9S960T
98ZT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
9S960T
ZLZT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
SS960T
8SZT
ZO /ZT /90
TOTT
bS960T
LJJii ----- --- ------ -dOaN3A-------------- a3nSSI alVa LJJEf HSdJ HaEKaN XDaHJ
a3IJI'dISadNn -aNn9 rI' HRN3`J - OOOT - aNnd
"MISIO32I XDHHJ TO /ZT :QOI-dHd JNILNnOJJii
VD 'XHVd-dOOW 90 3IIJ ZO /TT /90
06/11/02
176.00
5 /02AVRC PEST CONTROL
165.00
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
5 /13 &28COMPENSATI0N MTG
CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
200.00
CHECK NUMBER
200.00
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
-------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109677
200.00
1101
06/12/02
1397
MR. T'S CUSTOM EMBROIDERY
9205
109678
1101
06/12/02
1417
NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS
9254
109679
J BRAND BUSINESS CARDS
1101
06/12/02
1424
ORKIN EXTERMINATING
9102
109679
101.89
1101
06/12/02
1424
ORKIN EXTERMINATING
9103
806.41
TOTAL
CHECK
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
109680
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
1101
06/12/02
1425
OTTO, JR. WILLIAM F.
9001
109681
17.29
1101
06/12/02
1426
OUTBACK FOOTWEAR
9020
109681
1101
06/12/02
1426
OUTBACK FOOTWEAR
9020
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
TOTAL
CHECK
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
18.11
109682
202.15
1101
06/12/02
1436
PARVIN, JANICE
9001
109683
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
POSTAGE &HANDLING- PENCILS
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
208.35
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
AVCP TRENCHER RENTAL
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
278.85
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
109683
1101
06/12/02
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
109684
1101
06/12/02
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
TOTAL
CHECK
109685
1101
06/12/02
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9240
109685
1101
06/12/02
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9205
109685
1101
06/12/02
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
109686
1101
06/12/02
2239
RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC.
9240
109686
1101
06/12/02
2239
RDJ SPECIALTIES, INC.
9240
TOTAL
CHECK
109687
( >
1101
06/12/02
1952
RED'S BARBECUE & GRILLERY
9242
109687
1101
06/12/02
1952
RED'S BARBECUE & GRILLERY
9241
TOTAL
CHECK
109688
(
1101
06/12/02
2564
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO
9211
109688
iza�
1101
06/12/02
2564
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO
9211
109688
1101
06/12/02
2564
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO
9211
109688
1101
06/12/02
2564
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO
9252
RUN DATE 06/11/02
TIME 16:26:15
PAGE 3
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT DETAI 241.31
VEHICLE #2 BATTERY 85.75
5 /02CH PEST CONTROL
176.00
5 /02AVRC PEST CONTROL
165.00
341.00
5 /13 &28COMPENSATI0N MTG
200.00
ALCARAZ- SAFETY BOOTS
200.00
J CASILLAS SAFETY BOOTS
200.00
400.00
5 /13 &28C0MPENSATI0N MTG
200.00
B HOGAN BUSINESS CARDS
101.89
CERVANTES,JONES BSNS CARD
203.78
G WOLFE BUSINESS CARDS
101.88
B GARZA BUSINESS CARDS
101.89
J BRAND BUSINESS CARDS
101.89
R PETERSON BUSINESS CARDS
54.69
J HARTNETT BUSINESS CARDS
101.89
CM & ACM NAME BADGES
38.50
806.41
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
34.32
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.92
PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
17.29
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC
16.69
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
15.93
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
15.93
PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE
17.29
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN
17.29
AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
18.11
202.15
MPK PD SPECIAL SUPPLIES
11.28
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL SUPP
108.87
COMM SRVC SPECIAL SUPPPLI
26.43
146.58
POSTAGE &HANDLING- PENCILS
13.35
500PENCILS CUSTOM IMPRINT
195.00
208.35
MPK PD RECOGNITION EVENT
540.00
MPK PD RECOGNITION EVENT
196.12
736.12
GRIFFIN PRK TRENCHER
150.00
AVCP TRENCHER RENTAL
52.68
PEACH HILL PRK ROTOTILLER
139.41
HIGH ST ROTOTILLER RNTL
278.85
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/11/02
AMOUNT
GRIFFIN PRK ROTOTILLER
139.41
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
447.38
CHECK REGISTER
216.19
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
TRUCK #2 ELECTRICAL INSPE
75.00
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
109688
1101
06/12/02
2564
RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO
9252
TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES
TOTAL
CHECK
190.65
MPK PD PLAQUES ENGRAVED
57.04
109689
1101
06/12/02
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
109689
1101
06/12/02
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
203 LA AVE PROPERTY MAINT
TOTAL
CHECK
20.84
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
13.50
109690
1101
06/12/02
1064
SIMI VALLEY FORD
9254
109691
1101
06/12/02
1520
SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY
9204
109691
1101
06/12/02
1520
SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY
9204
4 /30- 5 /4FRONTLINE LEADERS
TOTAL
CHECK
37.42
PARKS SECURITY LIGHT BULB
441.87
109692
1101
06/12/02
3174
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9103
109693
1101
06/12/02
1552
STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL
9201
109694
1101
06/12/02
1658
TARGET
9244
109695
1101
06/12/02
1581
TOMARK SPORTS
9205
109696
1101
06/12/02
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9240
109697
1101
06/12/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9632
109697
1101
06/12/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9205
109697
1101
06/12/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9232
109697
1101
06/12/02
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9232
TOTAL
CHECK
109698
1101
06/12/02
2601
USA SPORTS PHOTOGRAPHY
9244
109699
1101
06/12/02
1604
VALERIO, BENITO
9252
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
109700
1101
06/12/02
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100
9251
TOTAL
CHECK
109701
1101
06/12/02
1617
VENTURA COUNTY STAR
9236
109701
1101
06/12/02
1617
VENTURA COUNTY STAR
2733
TOTAL
CHECK
109702
( y 1101
06/12/02
1157
VENTURA COUNTY, CAO /HR TR
9222
109703
} -, 1101
s
06/12/02
2097
VENTURA COUNTY, GSA FLEET
9254
109704
( �`; 1101
06/12/02
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9204
109704
a 1101
06/12/02
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9252
109704
1101
06/12/02
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
109705
1101
06/12/02
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC
9252
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:26:15
PAGE 4
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
GRIFFIN PRK ROTOTILLER
139.41
760.35
4 /02INTERSECTION MAINTENA
447.38
4/4/02 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REP
216.19
663.57
TRUCK #2 ELECTRICAL INSPE
75.00
CITY HALL LOCK BOX KEYS
18.98
PARKS KEYS
50.64
69.62
RETIREMENT SYSTEM STUDIES
400.00
CITY HALL TONER SUPPLIES
235.95
TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES
89.96
GRIFFIN PRK BSKT RIM BRKT
190.65
MPK PD PLAQUES ENGRAVED
57.04
METROLINK LANDSCAPE
9.09
CARLSBERG RANCH
11.80
AVCP RR PROJ XEROX
39.94
AVCP ELECTRICAL PICTURES
8.04
68.87
SPRING JBL PICTURES
602.10
203 LA AVE PROPERTY MAINT
150.00
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
20.84
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
13.50
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
2.99
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
5.42
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
42.75
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
3.00
4/02 REPEATER ACCESS 2001
61.50
150.00
4 /21MAINTENANCE WORKER I
259.90
4/19 ZELMAN HEARING
102.41
362.31
4 /30- 5 /4FRONTLINE LEADERS
401.00
MPK PD CYCLE CALIBRATION
37.42
PARKS SECURITY LIGHT BULB
441.87
COM CTR LIGHT BULBS
75.29
AVCP WELL PUMP REPAIR
68.74
585.90
SR CTR RR REPAIR
7.16
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
06/11/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT
109705 1101 06/12/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252
109705 1101 06/12/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208
TOTAL CHECK
109706 1101 06/12/02 1787 WILLIS, PAMELA S 9160
109707 1101 06/12/02 2843 WOLCO 9203
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
------- DESCRIPTION -------
AVCP SPRINKLER LINE REPAI
VECTOR OPERATING SUPPLIES
AWAY WE GROW EXTENDED DAY
4 /19- 5 /19PRKS /PW COPIES
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
18.53
7.68
33.37
30.00
67.36
18,971.87
18,971.87
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:26:15 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/11/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
455.39
1000
GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED
11,072.50
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
63.63
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
47.98
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1,070.03
2308
AD 84 -2 ZONE 8
360.00
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
2,655.11
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
11.22
2604
TEA 21 FEDERAL GRANTS
9.09
2605
GAS TAX
1,371.74
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
426.00
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
433.18
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
326.55
5001
SOLID WASTE AE939
101.89
6000
FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS
450.00
6513
ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER
102.41
6534
NORTH PARK VILLAGE
15.15
TOTAL
REPORT
18,971.87
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:26:19
PAGE 1
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
rN
06/11/02
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/01
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - --
VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02HUNTER CELLPHONE
47.91
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02WALTER CELLPHONE
29.09
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02HOGAN CELLPHONE
21.81
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02TRAFFENSTEDT CELLPHON
16.36
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02SHIGLEY CELLPHONE
33.02
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02RILEY CELLPHONE
43.61
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02CHUDOBA CELLPHONE
16.36
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02LINDLEY CELLPHONE
44.70
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5/02M RILEY CELLPHONE
34.30
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02KUENY CELLPHONE
62.28
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02GILBERT CELLPHONE
27.49
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02MPK PD CELLPHONES
1,058.63
109706
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02MORGENSTERN CELLPHONE
29.09
109708
1101
06/19/02
1003
A T &
T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /02JOHNSTON CELLPHONE
22.08
TOTAL
CHECK
1,486.73
109709
1101
06/19/02
2165
BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORA
9601
LA AVE WIDEN AT BELTRAMO
2,846.20
109710
1101
06/19/02
1114
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
9102
10 /01- 3 /02CASE WORKER REI
4,053.43
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
103.20
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
83.19
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL CHAIRS
724.97
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES
144.73
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9203
CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES
144.73
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9201
TONER /COMPUTER SUPPLIES
273.62
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
COM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES
213.56
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.07
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
HOUSING /MRA OFFICE SUPPLI
19.18
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
COMM DEV CHAIRS
724.97
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9208
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
362.48
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
COMM DEV KEYBOARD
320.68
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
30.86
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
518.54
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9205
MRA OFFICE CHAIR
362.48
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
403.47
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
37.46
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES
61.09
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
PW ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES
3.20
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
111.31
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES
49.61
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES
13.04
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES
4.16
109711
1101
06/19/02
1172
DATA
BYTE CENTRAL INC
9202
C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES
17.64
TOTAL
CHECK
4,742.24
109712
1101
06/19/02
1269
HDL,
COREN & CONE, INC
9102
2ND QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.66
109712
1101
06/19/02
1269
HDL,
COREN & CONE, INC
9102
2ND QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.66
109712
1101
06/19/02
1269
HDL,
COREN & CONE, INC
9102
2ND QTR 02 PROPERTY TAXES
591.68
TOTAL
CHECK
1,775.00
109713 1101 06/19/02 2145
109714 1101 06/19/02 1272
� 4
r 109715 1101 06/19/02 2529
{C RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:45:41
HEBEL, RAYMOND MICHAEL 9243 CONCERT PERFORMANCE 1,500.00
HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C 9252 DOZER VANDALISM REPAIR 2,971.87
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 TWO GUYS -MUSD MTG 19.09
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE 2
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
ICMA PUB -LAW ENF,PD ACCT
06/11/02
LEAGUE OF CA -DEV AGREEME
20.00
ICMA HOUSING -J HERNANDEZ
150.00
MPK COLLEGE -JWW BANQUET
675.00
SECRET GARDEN -BUS RECRUIT
53.12
WALMART- FOUNTAIN DEFOAMER
16.60
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ICMA HOUSING -H RILEY
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD:
12/01
ICMA PUB- MANAGING THREAT
CHECK REGISTER
5/02 -EZ2 INTERNET
45.00
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
1,358.78
CAMP MPK SPECIAL ATTRACTS
930.00
CHECK NUMBER CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
65.00
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9220
1- 4 /02USA PROP FEES
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9220
-9.75
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
NEW LA AVE BRIDGE ACQUISI
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
2,500.00
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9252
9,151.08
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
5 /020VERTIME-REG & COURT
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
ACCOUNTING
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9205
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9102
109715
1101
06/19/02
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
TOTAL CHECK
109716
1101
06/19/02
1312
JOLLY JUMPS INC
9244
109717
1101
06/19/02
1396
MR ROOTER PLUMBING INC
9252
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2734
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2751
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
3806
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2751
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2734
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2734
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
3806
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
9103
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
3806
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER - BOZYLINSKI
2751
109718
1101
06/19/02
1762
PARKER- BOZYLINSKI
9103
TOTAL CHECK
109719
1101
06/19/02
3175
PARS CALIFORNIA DEVELOPME
9610
109720
1101
06/19/02
1445
PICON, INC
9620
109721
1101
06/19/02
2955
RAMIREZ, RICARDO
9285
109722
1101
06/19/02
1499
ROBERT J. SCHUSTER PRODUC
9243
109723
1101
06/19/02
1511
SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC
9102
109724
1101
06/19/02
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
109724
1101
06/19/02
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
TOTAL CHECK
109725
1101
06/19/02
3054
SUPERIOR AWNING, INC.
9504
109726
1101
06/19/02
1948
TOTAL TENNIS ACADEMY
9160
^"
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9117
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9117
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9117
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9117
„a
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9118
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9254
109727
1101
06/19/02
1616
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
9117
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:45 :41
PAGE 2
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
ICMA PUB -LAW ENF,PD ACCT
38.56
LEAGUE OF CA -DEV AGREEME
20.00
ICMA HOUSING -J HERNANDEZ
150.00
MPK COLLEGE -JWW BANQUET
675.00
SECRET GARDEN -BUS RECRUIT
53.12
WALMART- FOUNTAIN DEFOAMER
16.60
MPK CHAMBER -02 STATE OF C
120.00
ICMA HOUSING -H RILEY
150.00
LA PLAYITA- HOUSING REHAB
25.88
ICMA PUB- MANAGING THREAT
20.53
5/02 -EZ2 INTERNET
45.00
MACARONI GRILL -MAYOR
25.00
1,358.78
CAMP MPK SPECIAL ATTRACTS
930.00
REPLACE 20' PW MAIN SEWER
2,052.00
1- 4 /02MPK MELODRAMA FEES
9.75
1- 4 /02MPK MELODRAMA
65.00
1- 4 /02USA PROP REVENUE
- 190.13
1- 4 /02COLMER DEVELOPMENT
2,080.00
1- 4 /02COLMER DEV FEES
312.00
1- 4 /02USA PROP FEES
190.13
1- 4 /02COLMER DEV REVENUE
- 312.00
PLANNING MGR INTERVIEWS
200.00
1- 4 /02MPK MELODRAMA REVEN
-9.75
1- 4 /02USA PROPERTIES
1,267.50
1- 4 /02RV ORDINANCE
227.50
3,840.00
NEW LA AVE BRIDGE ACQUISI
2,280.00
5 /02AVCP RESTROOM PROJECT
1,057.00
SP #23 FINAL INCIDENTAL FE
2,055.03
FEATURE CONCERT ACT
2,500.00
02/03 ASMNT ENGINEERING
4,077.28
5 /02INTERSECTION MAINTENA
1,333.50
5 /02INSURANCE ADJUSTMENT
72.15
1,405.65
25'WIDE RETRACTABLE AWNIN
2,656.58
TENNIS CLASS INSTRUCTOR
1,387.20
5 /02MIDDLE SCHOOL OFFICER
9,151.08
5 /02DARE OFFICER -5TH GR
9,151.08
5 /02HIGH SCHOOL OFFICER
9,151.08
5 /02INVESTIGATIVE SRVCS
30,349.17
5 /020VERTIME-REG & COURT
7,007.21
5 /02VEHICLE CHARGES
12,720.33
5 /02SPEC ENF DETAIL
10,185.50
PENTAMATION - FUND
ACCOUNTING
06/11/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - - --
------- VENDOR-- ------ -- -- -- ACCT
109727 1101 06/19/02 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9254
109727 1101 06/19/02 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
109727 1101 06/19/02 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
109727 1101 06/19/02 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
109727 1101 06/19/02 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117
TOTAL CHECK
109728 1101 06/19/02 3053 ZAMBELLI FIREWORKS MANUFA 9243
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:45:41
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
5 /02MINI VAN CHARGES
5 /02TRAFFIC SRVCS
5 /02COMM SRVCS
5 /02ADMIN ASSISTANT
5 /02PATROL SRVCS
7 /3FIREWORKS DISPLAY
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
127.00
23,040.92
10,018.33
5,285.08
169,729.67
295,916.45
4,000.00
344,891.44
344,891.44
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/11/02
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/01
CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
1,690.29
1000
GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED
297,284.89
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
1,057.00
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1,836.67
2312
AD 84 -2 ZONE 12
2,971.87
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
4,106.37
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
5,126.20
2605
GAS TAX
4,118.81
2609
OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS
15,597.58
2701
CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND
4,053.43
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
2,100.09
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER
1,023.86
6044
COLMER, WAYNE
2,392.00
6515
USA PROPERTIES
1,457.63
6950
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS
74.75
TOTAL REPORT
344,891.44
o
L
J
RUN DATE 06/11/02 TIME 16:45:45
PAGE 1
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
ITEM , 'C •
AC
Moorpark City Councily:
Agenda Report
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Work�(
DATE: June 6, 2002 (Council Meeting 6- 19 -02)
SUBJECT: Agreement Between the City and the County of Ventura and
Agreement Between the city and AirPhotUSA, Pertaining to
the Acquisition and Use of Aerial Imagery
nT CrTT.Q.QTnT\T
A. Ventura Count
The Ventura County Resource Management Agency (RMA) [Planning]
has taken the lead in coordinating efforts necessary to secure,
on behalf of a large number of public agencies, aerial
photographic imagery of the entire County.
B. Letter of Interest
Last April, a letter of interest (Exhibit 1) was provided to
the RMA.
C. Cost Sharing
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a list of the agencies which will be
sharing in the cost of these services and products. The City of
Moorpark's share will be $3,000. Funds for this purposed have
been identified in the FY 02/03 Budget.
D. Prior Purchases
In past years the City has secured aerial photography on its
own. The cost of these services and products was approximately
$8,000. Aerial Photography was purchased in 1990, 1994 and
1998.
Photo_2002
"
1W . .#
Aerial Photography
June 6, 2002
Page 2
E. Project Scope
Attached as Exhibit 3 is the Scope of Work and the
Specifications for the aerial imagery. The product will be
digital aerial imagery, in electronic format, retrievable via
the internet from the vendor.
F. Agreement: County
Attached as Exhibit 4 is an Agreement between the City of
Moorpark and the County of Ventura pertaining to the purchase
of these products and services.
G. Agreement: Vendor
Attached to the above mentioned Agreement is a draft of a
separate Agreement between the City and AirPhotUSA, the vendor
providing the aerial imagery. Pursuant to this Agreement, the
City agrees not to provide the aerial imagery to any third
parties which is not employed by the City and working on a City
project.
If it is possible to combine the two Agreements into one
Agreement with the County, it would be the intent of staff to
do so. If a "combined" Agreement is not possible, both
Agreements will be executed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the above Agreements, subject to final language approval
by the City Manager and City Attorney, and authorize the City
Manager to execute same.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Exhibit 4:
Photo_2002
Letter if Intent
Cost Sharing
Scope of Work
Agreements
E V 16•, b', � I
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 517 -6200
April 9, 2002
Thomas Berg
Ventura County Resource Management Agency
800 South Victoria Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009
SUBJECT: Letter of Intent for the City of Moorpark to Participate in a Local Partnership for the Cooperative
Purchase of Color Digital Aerial Photography
Dear Mr. Berg:
This letter is to inform you of the intent of the City of Moorpark to join with other Ventura County government
agencies and organizations in a collaborative effort to obtain current aerial imagery. This partnership is being
formed so that Ventura County geographic data and imagery can be acquired more economically and efficiently by
all partners.
We understand that the County of Ventura —the Resource Management Agency (RMA) together with the
Geographic Information Officer —will be coordinating the partnership and that the RMA will initially contribute
the bulk of the funds— $200,000. These funds were received by the RMA from a California Resources Agency,
Coastal Resources grant for a new flyover to create detailed, color, aerial imagery of the entire County. Moorpark,
along with other local agencies and nonprofits, will contribute additional funds towards this purchase and all
partners will have full access to the resulting aerial imagery. Any funds that remain after this initial imagery
acquisition will be used by the partnership for future, cooperative regional imagery and data acquisitions and
updates.
We understand the specifications of this project to be as follows:
• High precision aerial images at one -foot (South Half and selected other populated areas) and two -foot
(unpopulated areas) resolution;
• True color;
• Orthorectified;
• Imagery rectified to USGS (30 in posting) or Intermap (10 in posting) Digital Elevation Models (DEMs)
depending on the extent of funding from partner agencies; and
• Imagery useable in most mapping and GIS applications.
We understand that agencies and nonprofits are being asked to contribute funds towards this initial purchase in
proportion to their geographic scope as well as resources. It is the City of Moorpark's intention to contribute $3,000
to the partnership, contingent on our approval of a Memorandum of Understanding to formalize this relationship.
We look forward to a fruitful partnership with the Ventura County Resource Management Agency and the other
members of this collaborative.
Kenneth C. Gilbert
Director of Public Works
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager
C�
PATRICK HUNTER ROSEANN MIKOS CLINT HARPER KEITH F. MILLHOUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Partners
Ventura County Aerial Imagery Purchase
Committed
Contribution
Ventura County
via State Resources Agency Grant
$200,000.00
County Flood Control
$10,000.00
County Public Works
$10,000.00
County Fire Protection District
$5,000.00
California Coastal Conservancy
$3,000.00
California Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection
$5,000.00
California Dept of Fish and Game
$3,000.00
United Water Conservation District
$5,000.00
Casitas Municipal Water District
$3,000.00
Calle uas Water District
$5,000.00
Camrosa Water District
$3,000.00
Ojai Valley Sanitation District
$3,000.00
Ventura Regional Sanitation District
$3,000.00
City of Port Hueneme
$3,000.00
City of Camarillo
$3,000.00
City of Moorpark
$3,000.00
City of Fillmore
$3,000.00
City of Oxnard
$5,000.00
City of Ojai
$3,000.00
City of Simi Valley
$5,000.00
City of Thousand Oaks
$5,000.00
City of Ventura
$5,000.00
Gold Coast Innovation Center
$1,000.00
California Native Plant Society
$1,000.00
Cone'o Valley Unified School District
$500.00
Conception Coast Project
$500.00
University of California, Santa Barbara
$3,000.00
U.S. Navy
$5,000.00
Total Committed Funding
$304,000.00
Cost of This Aerial Imagery Purchase
$249,000.00
Excess Committed Funds
$55,000.00
5/29/2002
Exhibit 2
Lk1„ b A 3
Spring 2002 Ventura County Aerial Imagery
Scope of Work
SOURCE DATA:
Source imagery for the product will be acquired with a standard (RC -30) aerial mapping camera equipped
with a 152mm (6 ") wide angle lens and using 9 "x9" format (230 x 230 mm) color negative film.
Cartographic reference for this project will be derived from United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Digital Ortho Quarter Quads (DOQQ "S). The DOQQ's have a nominal planimetric accuracy of 33 feet
(10 meters) at 90% CE (1:12,000 scale national map accuracy). The DOQQ's have a I ground sample
distance.
The topographic data will be obtained from a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in ASCII X,Y,Z format,
obtained from InterMap Technologies for a portion of the county and/or the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute Digital Elevation Model (DEM) archive will be used for the area of the
County not covered by the InterMap DEM or if the County elect not to use the InterMap DEM the USGS
DEM will be used. The USGS DEM data has a nominal vertical accuracy of 23 -46 feet (7 -15 meters)
RMSE. InterMap has an "off the shelf' DEM collected in 1998 available for the southern portion of the
county. The InterMap refers to this as their "GT2 product" and represents an absolute vertical accuracy
of 2m RMSE. The InterMap DEM is provided in 10m posting. The available InterMap GT2 product is
shown in the attached Summary of Source Data.
SCOPE OF WORK - TASKS DEFINED
The general items of this scope are as follows:
1. Secure the imagery required for the project at both 1 foot and 2 foot resolutions as detailed on the
attached map. The project consists of the entire County of Ventura, California.
The imagery will be secured by our (State Certified DBE) Sub Consultant:
I. K. Curtis Services, Inc., Authorized AirPhotoUSA Distributor
2901 Empire Avenue, Burbank, California 91504
Telephone: (818) 842 -5127
2. Examine the imagery (negatives) to assure that all of the project area for both resolutions has
been secured and also verify that the imagery is cloud free and meets our standards for quality
imagery. Label each negative with the appropriate photo number, cut each negative from the roll
of film and place each negative in a new negative sleeve.
3. Convert each negative (scan) into a digital file. Prepare each image for Ortho Rectification.
4. Pick pass points (photo to photo) and ground control points for each photo.
5. Obtain first geometric solution. Edit points as needed to obtain required geometric solution.
Process rectification. Mosaic individual images into seamless image.
6. Balance (color and intensity of all images) the seamless mosaic.
7. Cut tiles from the seamless mosaic.
8. Compress (using our proprietary software) each tile and process each tile for use in PhotoMapper.
Mosaic individual compressed images into seamless image.
9. Deliver final ortho photography and Intermap Digital Elevation Model on CD ROMs
Spring 2002
Ventura County Aerial Imagery
Deliverable Specifications
$ Pixel Resolution to be Provided: 1 foot and 2 foot per attached map.
Absolute Accuracy: As stated, the Cartographic reference for this project will be derived from the USGS
DOQQ "S which have a nominal planimetric accuracy of 33 feet (10 meters) at 90% CE. Our exclusive
processing technology assures that the accuracy of the project will meet or exceed the accuracy of the
source data. Using the USGS data (DOQQ's and DEM) the resulting horizontal accuracy would be in the
"4m to 10m range" at 90% CE, and the vertical accuracy would be in the 7m to 15m range" RMSE. If the
InterMap DEM was used in conjunction with the USGS DOQQ's the resulting horizontal accuracy would be
in the "2m to 8m range" at 90% CE, and the vertical accuracy would be 2m RMSE. The benefit in using the
InterMap DEM would be realized in improved accuracy in the areas of the county with the most vertical
relief, and in the areas where there are errors in the USGS data.
Photo Scale: Approximately 1" = 1,000' for the 1 foot resolution and 1" = 2,000' for the 2 foot resolution
(30% FOL and 30% SOL).
Window of Acquisition: As soon as possible, subject to weather, following authorization to proceed.
Target dates are between April 15, 2002 and June 4, 2002.
Bands: True Color (24 Bit). PhotoMapper will also export/display 16 Bit and 8 Bit color and Grayscale.
Radiometric Image Balancing: The color of each image will be matched to the other using our exclusive
software. This process is accomplished after the project has been mosaiced into one seamless image
which assures even color balancing across the entire project.
End User Environment: Pentium class computer running Windows NT, Windows 95 and /or 98.
Projection Output: NAD 83, California Zone 5, English units (Seamless Mosaic). Virtually any geodetic
projection can be output during export from PhotoMapper.
Cloud Free: 100%
Area of Coverage: The county of Ventura, California.
Value Added: Final product will be delivered in PhotoMapper under a network site license supporting
unlimited users. PhotoMapper provides accelerated viewing of the digital aerial photography. The entire
project can be looked at on a computer screen and in just a few seconds someone can be looking at a view
scale of one inch equals three hundred feet. The software will also pan, zoom to a set scale, or
coordinate, accurately measure distances on the photography and figure the area of any polygon by simply
drawing around its boundaries. PhotoMapper's image export function is totally compatible with popular GIS
software such as Mapinfo and ArcView, and CADD software such as AutoCAD and Microstation and
virtually all Windows based software. The program will print directly to a printer or you can export an image
file into your favourite graphics, GIS or CADD program. This export function allows the user to specify the
scale, size and resolution.
Deliverable Format: Digital Compact Disc (CD) or DVD with PhotoMapper software. The project will be
delivered as two sets: 1) on separate CDs, and 2) a spanned CD set allowing the entire seamless mosaic
to be copied onto the servers hard drive. Other deliverables include Tif/Tfw format based on DOQQ grid in
NAD 27, California Zone 5.
Page 1 of 2
Attachment 1
Suitable Uses: Determine building layouts, right of ways, wildlife habits; locations of roads; land use
studies and analysis; density calculations; base for mapping newly developed areas; design concept
reports; preliminary area calculations; environmental studies; corridor studies; and change detection.
Documentation: Appropriate documentation will be provided in RTF format.
Technical Support: Unlimited telephone technical support for 1 year from the date of delivery and
acceptance of the project. Free software upgrades are available at www.photomapper.com /update.
Consultant is currently shipping PhotoMapper version 3.4.
Project Distribution Rights: AirPhotoUSA shall maintain ownership and its copyright on all material
developed under this contract with the provision that the County will have the right to redistribute the project
to all agencies participating with the county.
Project completion: 90 -120 days from date the negatives are received.
Page 2 of 2
Exhibit+
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK
AND THE COUNTY OF VENTURA FOR
ACQUISITION OF AERIAL IMAGERY
This AGREEMENT is made this day of , 2002 and is entered into by and between The City of
Moorpark, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and the County of Ventura, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and the COUNTY have determined that it will be to their mutual advantage and to the public's
benefit to coordinate the cooperative acquisition of digital aerial imagery and funding related thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and the COUNTY agree as follows, and enter into this AGREEMENT ( "AGREEMENT"
herein) regarding the acquisition of aerial imagery:
ARTICLE I: Definitions:
The following definition shall apply to this AGREEMENT:
AERIAL IMAGERY shall mean the digital aerial imagery of Ventura County, and the associated software, as
described in Attachment 1 (Spring 2002 Ventura County Aerial Imagery Deliverable Specifications) and
Attachment 2 (Spring 2002 Ventura County Aerial Imagery Scope of Work).
ARTICLE II: Term:
The term of this contract commences on , 2002 and ends, unless sooner terminated by COUNTY OR CITY,
after the AERIAL IMAGERY has been delivered to the CITY and COUNTY.
ARTICLE III: Funding and Administration
In order to accomplish the cooperative acquisition referred to herein, the CITY and COUNTY agree to the following
funding and administrative arrangements:
a. The COUNTY shall be responsible for coordinating the acquisition of the AERIAL IMAGERY.
b. The COUNTY agrees to fund $200,000 of the AERIAL IMAGERY costs.
c. The CITY agrees to fund $3,000 of the AERIAL IMAGERY costs. Payment shall be made to the COUNTY
as follows:
The COUNTY shall invoice CITY after the COUNTY has entered into the services contract with the
vendor. Payment shall be sent to:
County of Ventura, Resource Management Agency
800 South Victoria Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009 -1700
Attn: Bob Tovias
1 of 3
C
Exhibit 1
d. The CITY agrees to remit to the COUNTY the agreed upon amount within 60 days of the approval date of
this agreement.
e. The COUNTY shall arrange with the vendor for CITY to receive delivery of final ortho photograpy and
Intermap Digital Elevation Model on CD ROM.
f. The CITY, COUNTY and all other collaborators to this acquisition shall independently enter into data sharing
agreements with the vendor of the AERIAL IMAGERY, which is proprietary to the vendor. A sample of this
agreement is attached (Attachment `A'). The COUNTY shall play no role in negotiating data licensing and use
issues between the vendor and CITY.
g. At least $97,500 in funding is expected from all collaborators for the AERIAL IMAGERY acquisition.
h. Funds received in excess of the cost of the AERIAL IMAGERY will be placed in a County -held trust account
to be applied toward future, cooperative imagery acquisitions and updates. All collaborators to this AERIAL
IMAGERY acquisition, including the CITY, shall be invited to join in future cooperative imagery acquisitions,
the terms of which shall be negotiated at the time of said future acquisition.
ARTICLE IV: Terms:
No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the
parties hereto. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties
hereto.
ARTICLE V: Hold Harmless:
CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY from all actions, claims or judgments by, or in favor of, third parties
arising out of any act or omission of CITY, its officers, employees, or agents in connection with the performance of
this contract or which may arise from liens or claims in favor of third parties for services rendered or labor or materials
furnished by CITY in performance of this contract provided that CITY will not indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY
for any act or omission of any staff provided by COUNTY.
County shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY against all actions, claims or judgments by, or in favor of, third
parties arising out of any act or omissions of COUNTY, its officers, employees, or agents in connection with
performance of this contract or which may arise from liens or claims in favor of third parties for services rendered
or labor or materials furnished by COUNTY in performance of this contract.
ARTICLE VI: Notices
All notices or other official correspondence relating to AGREEMENT matters between the parties hereto shall be
made addressed to one of the following:
To RMA: Thomas Berg, Director
Resource Management Agency
800 South Victoria Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009
2of3
Exhibit 1
To CITY: Steven Kueny, City Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Or such other addresses as either party may designate hereinafter, in writing delivered to the other party.
ARTICLE VII: Assignment:
Neither party shall assign or transfer its interest in this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other.
This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
ARTICLE VIII: Article Headings
Article heading in this AGREEMENT is for convenience only and is not intended to be used interpreting or
construing the terms, covenants, and other conditions of this AGREEMENT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT the day and year first written
above.
CITY OF MOORPARK
Steven Kueny, City Manager
City of Moorpark
COUNTY OF VENTURA
Thomas Berg, Director
Resource Management Agency
3of3
�(-R f 1 Attachment A
DATA SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
AIRPHOTOUSA, LLC.
AND THE
C;-� Of � P�� CA�IFORNIA
This Agre meet ("the Agreement^) is made between AirPhotoUSA (`Airphoto "), -an Arizona
limited li iGty company located at 7122 North 27*' Avenue, Suite 500, Phoenix, AZ 85051, and
the of Ventura ( "6att�ty"), located at 800 South Victoria Ave., Ventura CA 93009,
effective January 31, 2001. C4_1
4..t
WITN�SSETH �E-
WHEREAS, Airphoto has entered into an agreement with the Gouty to provide 1 meter
color orthophotography of a portion of the county;
WHEREAS, both parties desire that the final otthophotography contain data as provided
by the County: and
WHEREAS, both parties perceive an opportunity to enhance the functionality of the
ottMhotography that Airphoto will produce and sell to the Geuity by integrating the County's
data into the PhotoMapper software for use by the Gowimy:--
NOW, THEREFORE, in exchange for the mutual promises and- covenants contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
DATA EXCHANGI~: The Eo my will provide Airphoto, free of charge, a copy of the County's
Data. Akphoto will integrate the Data into the PhotoMapper software and return the Data as
provided by the CewW to the Goo* and hereby warrants that the Cou rity's Data wif not be re-
sold or r"stdWted by Akphoto. The County hereby authorizes and Airphoto hereby reserves
the right to use the Oeartytsdata for marketing purposes only.
LICENSING: Airphoto will grant, subject to recWng�uil and oornplete payment from the
County, a perpetual, non - exclusive, license to the eomTtj4o use the PhotoMapper software, and
will also provide one network version of the software and Data, licensed for _ concurrent
users, and one stand alone version of the software and Data, both on CD -ROM or DVD.
ACCEPTANCE Airphoto accepts the County Data "as is" and acknowledges that the
County has not made any warranty or representation as to the accuracy, usability or
any other representation relating to the County Data.
AUTHORITY: The parties signing this Agreement affirm that they are duly authorized to bind
their respective companies to the terms and conditions of this Agreement_
CONMENTIAILI . Any proprietary Information that shall be shared between companies, shalt
remain confidential to the parties hereto (as well as their authorized agents, attorneys,
accountants, engineers, representatives and potential investors) and shall not be disclosed to
any other person without the consent of Airphoto and the- nless otherwise required by
law or the valid order of a Court, arbitrator or governmental administrative body. Each party
agrees that any infomnation it acquires from the other, other than information that is publicly
available, will be kept confidential, and will not be disclosed to any other party or used for any
purpose except the consummation and fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement.
WARRANTY AND PROP I�ETARY gIGNTS: The Ge" acknowledges and agrees that the
compressed Data, software and related documentation, together with all copyrights, trade
secrets and other intellectual property rights related thereto are proprietary to Airphoto and
protected by U.S. and intern tonal civil and criminal laws, and that Airphoto shall in all events
remain the owner of the compressed Data. The GewAy agrees to comply with U.S. intellectual
property laws with respect to the compressed Data. X
Airphoto represents and warrants that it owns all right, title, and interest in the associated
software and documentation, and that it has all necessary rights and power to provide copies of
the PhotoMapper software, and grant the rights and licenses granted to the County herein.
TRANSFER: The 6emay not sublicense, assign, or transfer any rights unde this
Agreement without the prior written consent of Airphoto. Any attempt by the Gear. to
otherwise sublicense, assign, transfer any of its rights hereunder shall be void. Upon any
assignment or transfer, the �Cew�s rights and future obligations hereunder shall terminate and
the assignee or transferee shall be fully bound hereby, but the Bom*)Sshall reinain responsible
for any liability incurred prior to the assignment or transfer. An assignment or transfer shall not
entitle the assignee or transferee to any extensions of warranties. This Agreement shall be
binding upon the parties their suceessors, and permitted assigns/transferees.
SEVERAB1LITY: In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be unenforceable or
invalid under any applicable taw, or be so held by applicable court or arbitration decision, such
unenforceability or invalidity shall not render this Agreement unenforceable or invalid as a
whole, and, in such event, such provision shall be changed and interpreted so as to best
accomplish the objectives of such unenforceable or invalid provision within the limits of
applicable taw or applicable court decisions.
GOVERNING LAW. VENUE, COSTS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES: The laws of the State of
California shall govern this agreement. Venue in any litigation shall be in the County of Ventura,
State of California. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees in connection with any
litigation. Costs shall be awarded in accordance with applicable law.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement supersedes all oral, written or other
communications concerning the subject matter of this Agreement, and shag not be altered,
amended, or modified except in a writing signed by the duty authorized officers of each party
hereto.
Page 2 of 3
C- -r:-..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the effective
date stated above.
AlrPhotoUSA, LLC County of bnt m C :1� Mix va,l<,
BT s _-
Name - -
Title
Data -
Page 3 of 3
By:
Name --
Title
Date
RECEIVED
MAY � 4 ?ow
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
CENTRAL SERVICES
ITEM 1 1 ' D •
Moorpark City
Agenda Report BY:
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert , Director of Public Works
DATE: June 6, 2002 (Council Meeting 6- 19 -02)
SUBJECT: Amendment to Agreement No 96 -07 Pertaining to the
Placement and Maintenance of a Temporary Traffic Signal
at the Intersection of [Old] Moorpark Road and Tierra
Rejada Road
Rnr'Vr-PMTT\TTI
In March of 1996, the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura
[ "County "] entered into an Agreement [City Agreement No. 96 -07;
County Agreement No. 96 -051 for the placement and maintenance of a
temporary traffic signal at the intersection of [Old] Moorpark
Road and Tierra Rejada Road [ "Intersection "] . The primary purpose
of the Agreement was to set forth the mutual understandings with
respect to maintenance costs to be shared by the parties. The
Agreement was signed by the Mayor, for the City, and by the
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, for the County.
DISCUSSION
A. Moorpark Road Realignment
The County is in the process of constructing the Moorpark Road
Realignment Project. When that project is completed, [Old]
Moorpark Road will be used for local traffic only and the
temporary traffic signal at the Intersection will no longer be
required.
B. Amendment to 1996 Agreement
The original 1996 Agreement is somewhat vague regarding the
design and function of the Intersection upon removal of the
temporary signal. The suggested language set forth in the
attached Amendment (Exhibit 1) requires the construction of
certain modifications, including a raised median [east- west] ,
at the Intersection to prevent left -turn traffic movements at
this future "uncontrolled" intersection. The purpose for these
improvements is to eliminate traffic safety problems which are
attendant to such left -turn movements.
MpkRd10_agree
07�
Moorpark Road / Tierra Rejada Road Temporary Traffic Signal
Amendment to Agreement with County
June 6, 2002
Page 2
C. Costs
As set forth in the original Agreement, the cost of the removal
of the temporary traffic signal, and the cost of the
aforementioned improvements, is to be shared by the City [2/3]
and the County [1/3]. [This is the ratio of the ownership of
the three legs of the intersection..]
D. County's Project
The County's project already includes the construction of the
median and certain other improvements at the Intersection. It
is anticipated that the removal of the temporary traffic signal
will be performed by a Contract Change Order or by a separate
contract.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the subject Amendment to Agreement, subject to final
language approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and
authorize the Mayor to execute same.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Amendment
MpkRd10_agree
Exhibit I
AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL
AT [OLD] MOORPARK ROAD AND TIERRA REJADA ROAD
City Agreement No.:
County Agreement No.:
Amendment No.
Organization / Firm:
Date of Original Agreement:
Effective Date of This Amendment:
Subject of Amendment:
96 -07
96 -05
1
County of Ventura
March 19, 1996
Removal of Traffic Signal, Intersection
Restriping and Median Modification .
RECITALS
A. The City of Moorpark ( "City ") and the County of Ventura ( "County ") entered into a
Cooperative Agreement on March 19, 1996, pertaining to the construction of a
temporary traffic signal ( "Temporary Signal ") at the intersection of Tierra Rejada Road
and [old] Moorpark Road ( "Intersection ").
B. That Agreement made certain limited provisions pertaining to the removal of the
Temporary Signal, when and if it was ever determined that it was no longer required.
C. The County is in the process of constructing the Moorpark Road Realignment Project.
That project will construct improvements which will prevent and preclude left -turn
traffic movements at the Intersection. When those improvements are constructed, the
Temporary Signal will no longer be necessary. The parties now, therefore, wish to
amend the March 19, 1996, Agreement to more specifically set forth the mutual
understanding with regard to the removal of the Temporary Signal and the construction
of certain other improvements related thereto.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the
parties agree to amend the aforesaid agreement as follows:
A. Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and a new Section 6 is hereby approved to read
as follows:
"6. As a part of, and in coordination with, the construction of the County's Moorpark Road
Realignment Project, County shall construct certain modifications to the intersection of
Tierra Rejada Road and [Old] Moorpark Road. The scope and terms of such work shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The County shall remove the Temporary Signal and all appurtenances thereto.
b. The County shall pay to the City a sum of $5,200, said amount being approximately
equal to ninety percent (90 %) of the cost of the traffic signal controller.
c. The County shall retain salvage rights to all of the traffic signal equipment and
materials currently in place at the Intersection.
d. The County shall construct a fourteen feet (14') wide raised center median through
the Intersection, extending from the raised median located west of the Intersection,
easterly to the fourteen feet (14') wide raised center median located approximately
three hundred seventy feet (370') east of the center of the Intersection, said new
raised median to be constructed in such a manner as to provide one continuous
raised median suitable for the future installation, by the City, of median hardscape
and landscaping. Said work shall include the removal of all existing asphalt
pavement, base and any subsurface concrete and the placement of soil suitable for
the installation of landscaping, in the area of the new median. Said work shall be
constructed pursuant to Sheets 16C, 40 & 58B of the County's project plans,
revised, if necessary, to fully implement the requirements of this Amendment.
e. The total cost for the modification of the Intersection ( "herein Intersection
Modifications Costs ") shall be equal to the total actual final contract costs for such
work, including the cost of all approved change orders and extra work orders, plus
an amount equal to twenty -five percent (25 %) of said construction costs, to cover
the cost of design, inspection and contract administration. The Intersection
Modification Costs shall not include the $5,200 payment to the City for the traffic
signal controller.
f. The City shall pay the County an amount equal to two - thirds (2/3) of the
Intersection Modification Costs. The City's portion of the Intersection Modification
Costs is estimated to be $16,000.00."
B. Section 9 of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following:
" Term: This Agreement shall terminate upon the Recordation of the Notice(s) of
Completion for all contracts awarded by the County for the construction of the work
described in revised Section 6 of this Agreement, and the payment of all sums provided
for in revised Section 6 of the Agreement. "
C. All other provisions of the aforesaid Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
CITY OF MOORPARK
a municipal corporation
By
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
COUNTY OF VENTURA, a political
subdivision of the State of California
C
Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
Date
2
ITEM 1
4k
Moorpark City Coun
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: June 12, 2002 (CC meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of an Addendum to the Ventura
Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) -East
Cooperative Agreement, Extending the Agreement with
an Annual Cost Allocation, and Consider Resolution
No. 2002 - Amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Transit Budget.
BACKGROUND
Council is being asked to approve an addendum to the VISTA -East
Cooperative Agreement and to appropriate additional funds in the FY
2002 -2003 budget. The Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority
(VISTA) transit services began in July 1994 to provide fixed route
bus services between cities in Ventura County. Each route is
administered through a Cooperative Agreement among the
participating jurisdictions. The VISTA -East Agreement provides for
commuter express bus service between the east county cities
(Moorpark, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks). This is the second year
of a three -year agreement. The cost allocation is adopted annually
by the City Council. The VISTA routes are administered for the
member jurisdictions by VCTC, the Ventura County Transportation
Commission.
VISTA has six routes:
VISTA 101
CSUCI
Conejo Connection
VISTA 126
VISTA -East
VISTA Coastal Express
Thousand Oaks to Ventura
Camarillo and Oxnard to Cal State
University Channel Islands
Thousand Oaks to Warner Center
Fillmore to Ventura
Moorpark to Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks
Ventura to Santa Barbara and Goleta
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of June 19, 2002
Page 2
Four of the VISTA routes operate Monday through Saturday. The
Conejo Connection operates only on weekdays, and the Coastal
Express operates seven days a week.
The VISTA -East service has gone through several changes since its
start. There have been changes in the frequency of service, and
number and size of vehicles. In 2000, VISTA -East service expanded
by starting one hour earlier and running for one hour later Monday
through Friday, and Saturday service was introduced. Currently,
VISTA -East operates Monday through Friday between 6:00 a.m. and
7:33 p.m. It circulates hourly between Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley,
and Moorpark. The VISTA -East stops are at Moorpark College,
Princeton Street, and Moorpark Station. Saturday service is every
two hours, between 6:55 a.m. and 6:13 p.m.
As the Council may recall, transit operators must meet a certain
farebox ratio in order to receive Transportation Development Act
(TDA) funding from the %/ state sales tax. VISTA -East has had to
meet a farebox ratio equal to 20% of its operating expenses. If the
20% is attained from the fare box revenue, the remaining 80% may be
eligible for TDA or other state or federal subsidies. The 20% ratio
may be adjusted downward for Saturday and off -peak service, as long
as the overall service doesn't dip below the 20 %. For the first six
months of the Fiscal Year VISTA -East route has a farebox ratio of
19.56 %.
The VISTA -East Committee met on March 27. The Committee, comprised
of elected officials from the cities of Moorpark (Councilmember
Mikos), Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, meets each year to discuss
the VISTA East service. The agenda for the meeting included cost
sharing arrangements, consideration of service levels, and the
VISTA -East Cooperative Agreement. The Committee also reviewed
testimony received in the Unmet Needs hearing process, and VISTA
passenger surveys.
The Committee received information on Saturday service. The
Saturday average is presently 87 riders per day. Last year, there
was an average of 47 riders per day on Saturdays on VISTA -East. The
service has a farebox ratio of 18.87 %, exceeding the Year 2 farebox
goal of 8 %. New transit programs are often set up as demonstration
projects with milestones to achieve in each of three years. When
Saturday service began, the VISTA -East Committee established the
farebox goals of 5% in Year 1, 8% in Year 2 and 16% in Year 3.
VISTA East Agreement 2002.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of June 19, 2002
Page 3
Overall, VISTA -East is projected to just make a 20% farebox ratio
this Fiscal Year.
The three cities agreed to share the cost to operate VISTA -East
based on population. Moorpark's population is 12.07% of the total
for the three cities, and its share of VISTA -East expense will be
$20,040 out of the total of $166,010 that is paid for by the
cities.
Moorpark's ridership percentage is greater than the other cities
compared to population. While Moorpark represents 12% of the
population, about 30% of the VISTA -East riders reside in Moorpark.
Monitoring of boardings and alightings by City staff at Moorpark
Station confirms that there has been a substantial increase in
VISTA ridership from Moorpark for the past two years. This may be
due to the fact that there has been more marketing of the VISTA -
East bus service in Moorpark than in the other cities.
The FY 2002/2003 Budget proposal submitted to the City Council
includes the expenditure of $18,500 in TDA for the City's share of
VISTA -East service. The actual estimate for the year is now
$20,040. As a result of the unexpected increase in the City's
share, it is necessary to make an adjustment in the budget,
increasing the allocation to cover the cost of the service. The
recommendation is to appropriate the additional $1,540 from the
carry -over of unexpended TDA transit funds. There would be no
impact on the General Fund, other transit programs, or the streets
and roads allocation of TDA funds. The Resolution amending the
budget in the appropriate amount is attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote
1. Approve the Addendum to the VISTA -East Cooperative Agreement for
FY 2002/2003, subject to final language approval by the City
Manager, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- amending the Fiscal Year
2002/2003 Transit Budget to reflect the City's share of the
VISTA -East service.
Attachment A - Addendum to Cooperative Agreement
VISTA East Agreement 2002.doc 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2002/2003 TRANSIT BUDGET FOR VISTA -EAST
COMMUTER BUS SERVICE.
WHEREAS, public transit is important to preserve the
quality of life in Moorpark, reduce traffic congestion, and
protect the environment; and
WHEREAS, VISTA -East is a commuter express bus service
linking Moorpark to other cities and additional VISTA bus
routes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark sponsors VISTA -East with
its partners, the cities of Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and
the Ventura Transportation Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need for, and the
benefits of, continuing the VISTA -east bus service.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A budget amendment as more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby
approved.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified
resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June 2002.
Resolution No.
Page 2
APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FY 2002 -2003 Community Services Department
Transit Programs
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS
TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS
ACCOUNT
APPROPRIATION
FUND
NUMBER
REQUEST
Transit
5000 -3510
1,540
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS
TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS
Approved:
CURRENT
APPROPRIATION
REVISED
ACCOUNT NUMBER
APPROPRIATION
REQUEST
APPROPRIATION
Vista East Contractual
Services
18,500
1,540
21,040
5000.7310.7301.9102
Transit Revenues
508,994
1,540
510,534
Total
18,500
1,540
21,040
Approved:
Attachment A
Cooperative Agreement FY 2002 -03 Page 1
Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East
ADDENDUM (FY 2002/03)
TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FY 2001/02
VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA)
EAST
This Addendum to the Cooperative Agreement for VISTA East service is made and
entered into by and among the CITY OF MOORPARK (Moorpark), the CITY OF SIMI
VALLEY (Simi Valley), the CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS (Thousand Oaks) and the
VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (VCTC). Moorpark, Simi
Valley and Thousand Oaks are collectively referred to herein from time to time as the
"AGENCIES."
This Addendum continues the services described in revised Attachment A, under the
terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement, FY 2001/02, Ventura Intercity
Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East, for FY 2002/03.
Section 3: Fundinq
For FY 2002/2003, the required local match shall be paid by the AGENCIES as stated
below.
Percent Approximate Annual Share
City of Moorpark 12.07% $18,020
City of Simi Valley 43.10% $64,345
City of Thousand Oaks 44.83% $66,923
(Revised) Attachment "A "- Route and Service Description- is attached and
incorporated herein by this reference.
(Revised) Attachment "B "- Performance Reporting- is attached and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Except as amended and revised herein, the terms and conditions set forth in the
Cooperative Agreement (FY 2001 -02) shall remain in full force and effect.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dates stated
below.
CITY OF MOORPARK
By
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney Date
Cooperative Agreement FY 2002 -03
Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East
CITY OF SIMI VALLEY
By
CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS
M
Date
Date
VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
By
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM
General Counsel Date
Page 2
Cooperative Agreement FY 2002 -03 Page 3
Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East
Attachment A (Revised)
ROUTE AND SERVICE DESCRIPTION
The following is a general description of the VISTA -EAST COUNTY service, which may
be revised and /or adjusted during the fiscal year by agreement of the AGENCIES.
The route is an intercity, fixed route, express bus service in eastern Ventura County with
connections to adjacent Los Angeles County. The route includes stops at: Thousand
Oaks Transit Center (Rancho Road), Oaks Mall, Westlake Boulevard /Townsgate Road
and the Thousand Oaks Library in Thousand Oaks; Country Club Rd./Wood Ranch, and
Madera Road /Los Angeles Avenue in Simi Valley; Moorpark College, and the Moorpark
Metrolink Station in Moorpark.
On weekdays service will operate between approximately 6 am and 7 PM. In the
morning and evening peak hours, the buses will run on approximately 60- minute
headways. In the off -peak hours, the headways may increase to approximately 120
minutes. The peak hours will be a maximum of three hours in the morning and three
hours in the afternoon.
Saturday service will operate between approximately 7 AM and 6 PM. The buses will run
on approximately 60- minute headways. In the off -peak hours, the headways may
increase to approximately 120 minutes. The peak hours will be defined in the final
schedule, but it will be a minimum of three hours in the morning and three hours in the
afternoon. The effectiveness of the service to continue meeting the performance criteria
will be evaluated again as part of the FY 2003 -04 VISTA EAST Cooperative Agreement
approval.
The schedule will be arranged to provide timed transfers with local and intercounty
transit providers such as the Simi Valley Transit (which provides connecting access to
the Simi Metrolink Station); Thousand Oaks Transit, the VISTA -101 service, Moorpark
Transit, and Los Angeles MTA as feasible.
VISTA EAST one -way passenger fares are: $1 for adults between 21 and 61 years of
age; $1 for youth 6 to 20 years; and 50 cents for seniors aged 62 and older and for
persons with disabilities. Children 5 and under ride free if accompanied by fare paying
adult.
The SmartCard Passport fares are: adults $40; youth $40; seniors and persons with
disabilities $20. Purchased monthly, this passport is valid for unlimited trips on all
Ventura County fixed -route public bus systems (not including inter - county service). A
cash debit feature is also available.
For an additional 50 cents per trip, holders of the base pass may use the Dial -A- Rides,
except on systems where this offer is not valid.
Cooperative Agreement FY 2002 -03 Page 4
Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East
Attachment B (Revised)
PERFORMANCE REPORTING
On a quarterl basis, VCTC will calculate and provide operating statistics and
performance indicators for Weekday service, Saturday service, and for All Periods
combined, for monthly, quarterly, and total year -to -date periods, to include:
• Farebox Revenues
• Farebox Recovery Ratio*
• Contractor Operating Cost
• Administration Costs
• Total Adjusted Operating Costs
• Passengers
• Total Operating Cost per Passenger
• Vehicle Service Hours
• Total Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour
• Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour
• Total Hours
• Vehicle Service Miles
• Passengers per Vehicle Service Mile
• Total Miles
Farebox Recovery Ratios shown will be the adjusted ratio so that all transit
systems may be compared equally. For all VISTA contract services, this means that
operating costs equal the sum of operating and maintenance costs contained in each
contract, or, conversely, contract costs minus all capital costs.
ITEM I i. F.
of
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORTS
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst k G
DATE: June 7, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/19/02)
SUBJECT: REQUEST BY ROAM'N RELICS CAR CLUB TO HOLD CAR SHOW ON
OCTOBER 27, 2002 FROM 8 A.M. TO 3 P.M. ON HIGH STREET AND
TO REDUCE CITY FEES FOR THE EVENT
BACKGROUND
The Roam' n Relics Car Club has held its annual car show on High
Street the past eight years. This year, the event is planned for
October 27 from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on High Street. In 2001, the
event attracted about 530 pre -1973 vehicles and 4,500 spectators.
Last year, the City charged the Club $1,560 for planning and
staffing the event, including $1,126 for police, $246 for other
staff, and $188 for permits.
DISCUSSION
Each year, Council has granted the Club's request to reduce City
fees to varying degrees because event proceeds are donated to local
charities and Moorpark merchants benefit from increased visibility.
Last year, the Club donated a total of $3,700 to three charitable
groups (Christmas Adopt -A- Family, Cub Scouts, and Moorpark Food
Pantry). Surveys indicate that most High Street merchants attract
four times as many customers during the event.
No major changes are planned for the 2002 car show. The Club
expects about 530 pre -1973 vehicles and 4,500 spectators,
generating about $15,500 in revenues and $6,000 in donations to
local charities after expenses. As in the past, the Club will
promote High Street businesses through raffles and free
advertisements, and provide free booth space to City departments.
071 — 5
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002
Page 2
Staff recommends the same fee reductions Council approved last
year: waive fee for use of Redevelopment Agency property, charge
contract billing rate for police (roughly $1,106), and charge
direct cost for Senior Management Analyst (about $269). Including
regular fees for an encroachment permit ($100) and a temporary
special use permit ($88), estimated City fees total $1,563.
Staff will meet with the car show chairperson to discuss permit
conditions. As in the past, the City will not staff the event
other than assigned police whom will be present to ensure adherence
to permit conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Waive fee for use of Redevelopment Agency property, charge
Club the contract billing rate for police charged by the
County, and charge Club the direct cost of other staff to plan
the event;
2. Require Club to pay an encroachment permit fee ($100) and a
temporary special use permit fee ($88); and
3. Require Club to provide the City and Agency with an
indemnification agreement and name the City and Agency as
additional insureds on the Club's insurance policy.
ITEM 11. Csr,
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 10, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Consider Parks and Recreation Commission Vacancy
DISCUSSION
Parks and Recreation Commissioner Craig Chally will be
relocating outside of the City of Moorpark. As a result, he
has submitted his resignation, effective June 30, 2002.
This will create a vacancy on the Commission.
The Parks and Recreation Commission consists of five
members appointed by the City Council. The Commission
serves a two -year term that coincides with the
reorganization of the City Council that takes place every
even - numbered year. When there is a vacancy, it is filled
for the unexpired portion of the term. The current
Commission's term will expire as of November 2002.
It is anticipated that where will be approximately two or
three meetings between now and the expiration of the
current Commission's term (it is expected that July and
August meetings will be canceled). With so few meetings
remaining, staff suggests that the vacancy not be filled at
this time, but that the Council wait until it appoints a
new Commission, after the reorganization of City Council
following the November 2002 election.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct that the Parks and Recreation Commission vacancy
remain unfilled through the end of the current term.
rrEM i I* H 0 OWNSM
cf
ACT
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT P`':
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk �� I
DATE: June 7, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/19/02)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of the
Holding of the General Municipal Election to be Held on
Tuesday, November 5, 2002, for the Election of Certain
Officers of the City and Requesting the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Ventura to Consolidate said
Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on
said Date, and a Resolution Requesting the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Ventura to Permit the County
Clerk to Render Services to the City of Moorpark for the
General Municipal Election and to Canvass the Returns of
the General Municipal Election
DISCUSSION
The General Municipal Election is scheduled for November 5, 2002,
for the purpose of electing a Mayor and two members of the City
Council. To request consolidation with the Statewide General
Election to be held on the same day, the City Council must call for
the General Municipal Election and file a request with the County
Board of Supervisors for consolidation (see Resolution included as
Attachment 1) .
In conjunction with the calling of the Municipal General Election,
and pursuant to Section 10002 of the Elections Code, the City can
request that the Board of Supervisors permit the County Clerk to
render services in conducting the Municipal General Election (see
Resolution included as Attachment 2).
The County's election calendar for the November 5 election
identifies that the last day for the Council to file with the
County Board of Supervisors (with copy to County Clerk) a Council
resolution requesting consolidation of Municipal Election is July
5.
�r
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002 Meeting
Page 2
Three City Council positions (Mayor and two Councilmember
positions) will be on the ballot for the November 5, 2002 Municipal
Election. The candidate filing period begins July 15 and ends at
5:00 p.m. on August 9, unless one of the incumbents does not run
for reelection, in which case the filing period is extended to 5:00
p.m. on August 14.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2002- and Resolution No. 2002-
Attachments: Draft Resolutions
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002, FOR THE ELECTION
OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES; AND REQUESTING THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF VENTURA TO
CONSOLIDATE SAID MUNICIPAL ELECTION WITH THE
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION ON SAID DATE, PURSUANT
TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general
law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election
shall be held on November 5, 2002, for the election of Municipal
Officers;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of
the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is
called and ordered held in the City of Moorpark, California, on
Tuesday, November 5, 2002, a General Municipal Election for the
purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two (2) years and
two (2) Members of the City Council of the City for the full term
of four (4 ) years.
SECTION 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall
be in form and content as required by law.
SECTION 3. That the polls for the election shall be open at
seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open
continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same
day, when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section
14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 4. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403
of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Ventura is hereby requested to consent and agree to the
consolidation of said Municipal Election with the Statewide General
Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2002.
SECTION 5. That said Board of Supervisors is hereby requested
to issue instructions to the County Clerk to take any and all steps
necessary for the holding of said consolidated election.
. ,4 , I, r,% -7, .)
Resolution No. 2002
Page 2
SECTION 6. That in all particulars not recited in this
Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by
law for holding municipal elections.
SECTION 7. That notice of the time and place of holding the
election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and
directed to give such further or additional notice of the election,
in time, form, and manner required by law.
SECTION 8. That the City Clerk of the City of Moorpark is
hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with
the Board of Supervisors and the County Clerk of the County of
Ventura.
SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of
original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF VENTURA TO PERMIT THE
COUNTY CLERK TO RENDER SERVICES TO THE CITY OF
MOORPARK FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2002, AND TO CANVASS THE RETURNS
OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the
City of Moorpark, California, on November 5, 2002, for the purpose
of electing certain officers of the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10002 of the Elections Code, the
City of Moorpark wishes to have the County Clerk of Ventura County
render specified services to the City relating to the conduct of
the election; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark authorizes the Board of
Supervisors of Ventura County to direct the County Clerk to canvass
the election returns of the General Municipal Election to be held
in the City of Moorpark on November 5, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Elections Code, the Board of
Supervisors is requested to permit the County Clerk to render
services with respect to the conduct of the General Municipal
Election, as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part
hereof; and that any and all other such services be rendered as may
be necessary to complete the election.
SECTION 2. That the County Clerk of said County is hereby
authorized to canvass the returns of said General Municipal
Election.
SECTION 3. That the City of Moorpark recognizes that
additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of these
services being rendered, and agrees to reimburse the County for any
such costs.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk of the City of Moorpark is
hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura.
C4'+ r?, r^% n r)
- v w-- -.1 -.r
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 2
SECTION S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed
in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2002.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit A - Request for Specified Election Services
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 3
REQUEST FOR SPECIFIED ELECTION SERVICES
TO: RICHARD D. DEAN, County Clerk and Recorder
FROM: MOORPARK DEBORAH S. TRAFFENSTEDT
(City) (City Clerk)
ELECTION: GENERAL MUNICIPAL DATE: November 5, 2002
HOURS: The polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
ITEM #1 PUBLICATIONS
X A. County elections official is requested to publish:
Notice of Election (including measure information,
if applicable), Offices, Nominees, Elections
Officers and Polling Places.
B. City will publish above.
ITEM #2 CANDIDATE FORMS
County elections official will furnish one master set
for copying.
ITEM #3 CANDIDATE FILING
County elections official will check nomination
petition signatures.
ITEM #4 CANDIDATE STATEMENT
X A. Maximum number of words permitted for the
Candidate's Statement will be 200 words.
(200 to 400)
X B. City to be billed for pro rata cost of handling
and printing Candidate Statements. Pursuant to
Elections Code Section 10002, City agrees to
reimburse county elections official in full for
the services performed upon presentation of a
bill.
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 4
ITEM #5 CAMPAIGNING EXPENDITURE MATERIAL
County elections official will furnish one master set
for copying.
ITEM #6 STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS
County elections official will furnish one master set for
copying.
ITEM #7 CANDIDATE CERTIFICATES /OATH OF OFFICE
NA A. County elections official is requested to furnish
Certificates /Oaths of Office.
1. Blank forms only. Number requested _
2. Forms filled in appropriately. Number
requested
X B. City will furnish Certificates /Oaths of Office.
ITEM #8 DIRECT /REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
County elections official will furnish all argument
information, e.g., deadline dates, maximum number of
words, Form 9600, format, etc.
ITEM #9 TRANSLATIONS
Elections official will arrange for all translations
pursuant to Elections Code Section 13307.
ITEM #10 PRINTING
Elections official will arrange for all printing of
Candidates' Statements and arguments /analyses.
ITEM #11 ABSENTEE BALLOTS
Elections official will handle all absentee ballots,
including the checking of applications and ballot
mailing. Applications and envelopes will be provided to
City Clerks.
ITEM #12 POLLING PLACES /PRECINCTS
County elections official will determine the number of
polling places.
C ,4-.
..e ti,�,.,....
Resolution No. 2002 -
Page 5
ITEM #13 ELECTION DAY VOTER INFORMATION
x A. Diskette or CD of registered voters and polling
places.
B. Hard copy of registered voters and polling places.
ITEM #14 ELECTION NIGHT RESULTS
A. CRT
x B. Phone
x C. FAX
The undersigned requests the above election services to be
performed by the County elections official, and pursuant to
Elections Code Section 10002, agrees to reimburse the County in
full for services requested upon presentation of a bill.
Signed:
Title: City Clerk
City: Moorpark
Date: June 21, 2002
ITEM I I • _ •
rte 16F
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: June 12, 2002 (CC Meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Approval to Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal
Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing to Consider Bond
Issue for 190 -Unit Senior Housing Project by USA
Properties Fund, Inc. (Parcel Map 5316)
BACKGROUND
USA Properties Fund, Inc., is proposing to develop Vintage Crest
Senior Apartments, a 190 -unit senior apartment project located
at the intersection of Park Lane and Park Crest Lane. All units
will be affordable to low or very low income households. The
proposed project is to be considered by the Planning Commission
at its June 24, 2002, meeting for recommendation to the City
Council for a Zone Change, General Plan Amendment, and
Residential Planned Development Permit.
Financing for this project is anticipated from the issuance of
tax - exempt revenue bonds in the amount of $16,500,000 and from
4% tax credits. The bonds would be paid from the revenue
generated by rents from this project and be non - recourse both to
the City and to the Redevelopment Agency. A Regulatory
Agreement between the Developer and the City would assure
ongoing affordability of all units in the project and would set
forth reporting requirements to monitor this.
Internal Revenue Code requirements stipulate a public hearing be
held to enable the City to consider a bond issue as described in
this report.
� �✓ V ►t4 Owe �
Honorable City Council
June 19, 2002, Meeting
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) hearing for
July 17, 2002, and direct staff to take necessary actions to
initiate this hearing.
ITEM I I * To
Moorpark City y Council--, ... _
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: June 12, 2002 (CC meeting of June 19, 2002)
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Franchise Extension
SUMMARY
The City of Moorpark has exclusive solid waste collection franchise
Agreements with Moorpark Rubbish Disposal and G.I. Industries. The
Agreements expire June 30, 2002. As Council may recall, an Ad Hoc
Committee consisting of Councilmember Harper and Mayor Pro Tem
Mikos was established to review the Agreements and look at service
modifications, including automated collection.
Staff and the Committee have been working to that end. While the
Agreement is nearly complete, it makes extensive changes to the old
Agreement and the language requires further technical review.
Consequently, the Council is being asked to extend the current
Agreement for three additional months until September 30, 2002.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve and authorize staff to process an extension of the City's
Franchise Agreements with Moorpark Rubbish Disposal and GI
Industries, through September 30.
���A,�Z7
ITEM- i l . k. owmWON&VOOKS
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City Clerk
DATE: June 14, 2002 (CC Meeting of 6/19/02)
SUBJECT: Consider Rejection Of Claims: Constantino Noval & Peach
Hill Soils, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On April 4, 2002 (and Notice of Errata received on April 8, 2002),
the City received a claim for damages from the claimant Peach Hill
Soils, Inc., and on April 11, 2002, the City received a claim for
damages from the claimant Constantino Noval. The claims were
forwarded to the City's claims adjuster for review and were
subsequently returned due to late filing more than six months after
the event on November 4, 2000, at which time a truck being driven
by Sergio Mendoza was struck by a train as it attempted to cross
railroad tracks at a privately owned railroad crossing. On May 16,
2002, the subject claims were resubmitted by the attorney
representing the claimants based on Government Code Section 901,
which provides the date upon which a cause of action for equitable
indemnity or partial equitable indemnity accrues shall be the date
upon which a defendant is served with the complaint giving rise to
the defendant's claim for equitable indemnity or partial equitable
indemnity against the public entity."
The incident for which the claims have been filed was actually
outside of the City limits, approximately 263 feet north of State
Route 118 and .5 mile east of Hitch Boulevard, at a privately owned
railroad crossing. The City's claims adjuster has recommended
rejection of the claims.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Reject the claims and direct staff to send a standard rejection
letter to the claimants.