The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG RPTS 2002 1106 CC REGResolution No. 2002 -2023 Ordinance No. 290 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2002 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Introduce new City Employee, City Clerk I. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: 799 Moorpark Avenue Maureen Benson, Deputy (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING, UNLESS CANCELLED.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. V Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 2 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2. 8, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Major Modification No. 3 to CPD No 89 -01 (Mission Bell Plaza) to Allow Tenant Improvements in the existing Theater Building for a 26,000 Square Foot Fitness /Sports Club with a 8,500 Square Foot, Three Theater Cinema, with 500 Seat Maximum, and Outdoor Swimming Pool with Decking and Fencing. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Major Modification 3 to Commercial Planned Development 89 -01 subject to Conditions of Approval. (Staff: Barry Hogan) B. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change No 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, and Minor Modification No 1 to Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, a Request for a Change in Land Use Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential), Zone Change from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD 9.1 Dwelling Units /Acre, the Addition of Three Lots to an Approved 22 -Lot Single - Family Residential Subdivision, and the Construction of Three Single Family Detached Affordable Units, on Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company and the City of Moorpark. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -_ Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04; Ordinance No. for first Resolution No. 2002- , approv: Modification No. 1, and Development Permit No. 2001 -01 No. 1. (Staff: Barry Hogan) approving 4) Introduce reading; 5) Lng Tract 5307 Residential - Minor Modi General Zoning Adopt - Major Planned Eication C. Consider Re- Allocating Proceeds from Sale of 6479 -B Penn Street (Community Block Grant Funds). Staff Recommendation: 1) Continue this item to the City Council meeting of November 20, 2002; and 2) Refer the matter to the Budget and Finance Committee for consideration prior to the City Council meeting of November 20, 2002. (Staff: Nancy Burns) 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Report Pertaining to the Efforts Required to Seek a Restriction of Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route 118 between Route 23 and Route 34. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to instruct Parsons to: 1) Delete the prior Task 2 (removal of the NHS designation) from the Scope of Work; 2) Add a Revised Task 2 to the Scope of Work to conduct a Safety Analysis of the subject Highway Segment for the fee amount indicated in this report; and 3) Defer work on Tasks 3 and 4 until after the Safety Analysis has been reviewed by the City Council. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) B. Consider Underground Conversion of Electrical Transmission Lines on Los Angeles Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to proceed with steps necessary to develop a project for the undergrounding of the transmission lines between Shasta Avenue and Millard Street (Segments D & E). (Staff: Ken Gilbert) C. Consider Art in Public Places Project for Moorpark Marketplace (CPD No. 2002 -01) . Staff Recommendation: Approve Zelman's (CPD 2001 -01) Art in Public Places project as submitted. (Staff: Mary Lindley) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 4 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 8, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - November 6, 2002. Manual Warrants 110895 - 110895 & $ 737.44 110896 - 110901 $ 61,463.22 Voided Warrant 110028 & $ (62.06) 110872 & 110875 & $ (14,758.46) 111044 $ 0.00 Payroll Liability 110902 - 110909 $ 13,193.32 Warrants Regular Warrants 110910 - 111036 & $ 29,896.78 111037 - 111075 $ 410,303.73 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider Amicus Support in Barden V. City of Sacramento. Staff Recommendation: Direct the City Attorney to sign the representation form authorizing the City of Moorpark to be added to the amicus curiae petition. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) D. Consider Selection of a Consultant to Prepare the Arroyo Simi Trail Study. Staff Recommendation: Approve selection of RRM Design Group to prepare the subject study for a fee amount not to exceed $125,000, and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement for this work, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and the City Attorney. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) E. Consider Adjustment to the Hourly Rates Charged for Engineering Services. Staff Recommendation: Approve a 1.8% increase to the rates charged for Engineering Services, effective December 1, 2002. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 5 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) F. Consider Notice of Completion for the Miller Parkway Widening Project (Project 8032). Staff Recommendation: Accept the work as complete and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) G. Consider Adoption of Resolution Establishing the Annual Investment Policy for the City of Moorpark. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - establishing the City of Moorpark's Investment Policy. (Staff: Johnny Ea) H. Consider Bond Exoneration for Burger King Project (Cimms Inc.). Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate bonds 3SM88956900 and 3SM88957000. (Staff: Walter Brown) I. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Revising Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities and Rescinding Resolution No. 99 -1582 and Adoption of a Resolution Revising Use Fees for the Use of City Facilities and Rescinding Resolution No. 99 -1583. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - and Resolution No. 2002- (Staff: John Harnett) 11. ORDINANCES: None. 12. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 6 12. CLOSED SESSION: (Continued) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited Partnership and Messenger Investment Company, Inc., a California Corporation vs. The City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO23388) F. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 050 -270, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Colin Velazquez Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment G. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 050 -080, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Monte Louis Abbath Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment H. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 506 -0- 042 -015, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Bert and Placide Curts Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Regular City Council Meeting Agenda November 6, 2002 Page 7 12. CLOSED SESSION: (Continued) I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Administrative Services Director, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, and Public Works Director. 13. ADJOURNMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II). MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council ITEM SO. A • FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Direc41V Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Plan DATE: October 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 11/6/02) TTN SUBJECT: Consider Major Modification No. 3 to CPD No 89 -01 (Mission Bell Plaza) to Allow Tenant Improvements in the existing Theater Building for an 26,000 Square Foot Fitness /Sports Club with an 8,500 Square Foot, Three Theater Cinema, with 500 Seat Maximum, and Outdoor Swimming Pool with Decking and Fencing. BACKGROUND Mission Bell Plaza, is located on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue and west of Park Lane. On October 17, 1990, the City Council certified the EIR and approved Commercial Planned Development (CPD) 89 -01 and -02 for a conventional retail /office center within 2 large "phases ". The original project approval consisted of medical offices, a day care center, retail commercial space; restaurant space; and a gas station /car wash. In 1991, Major Modification No. 1 revised the proposal to allow 221,440 square feet of retail commercial space, 24,000 square feet of restaurants, a 2,300 square foot gas station, 9,000 square feet of medical /dental offices and a 9,200 square foot outdoor plant nursery. In 1994, Major Modification No. 2 revised the western phase (CPD 89 -01) of Mission Bell Plaza further, to modify the square footages and include a movie theater, created several "pads" and created specific categories of uses. Modification No. 3 to CPD No. 89 -01 proposes tenant improvements to the former theater building creating an +26,000 square foot fitness /sports club, an +8,500 square foot, three theater cinema with a 500 stadium seat maximum, and outdoor swimming pool with decking and fencing. S: \Community Development \= PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \staff report \021106 cc .doc 000001 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Setting Mission Bell Plaza is an existing commercial retail center on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue west of Park Lane. The center currently has a number of vacancies, including the former Regal, 8 screen theater building. The proposed modification includes tenant improvements to the theater building that would create a health club, three (3) screen cinema and outdoor swimming pool. Project Summary Proposed Use Building Area (sq. ft.) Health Club Facility 26,000 Three Theater Cinema (500 Seats) 8,500 Outdoor Pools, Spa, and Children's Play Area N/A Total 34,500 Proposed Project Tenant Improvements: The tenant improvements consist of a +26,000 square foot fitness /sports club with a +8,500 square foot, 500 seat maximum three theater cinema within the existing eight -plex theater building. The improvements will include locker rooms, workout rooms, group exercise rooms a child care room and three stadium seated theaters. The lap pool, spa, children's pool and play area are proposed within an outdoor fenced area on the north side of the building. The theater and the health club will share a common access and lobby; however, interior circulation will be separated. Architecture: Windows are being added to the north elevation to allow for natural light in the fitness /sports club portion of the building. Minor exterior changes are anticipated with respect to entrances /exits and signage. During the building plan check process, there may be some additional minor changes to meet the Building Code, but no significant architectural changes are anticipated. The outdoor swimming pool will involve not only construction of the pool, but decking and fencing as well. Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 3 Signage: The applicant has not yet proposed new signage for the facility. Any new signage must be consistent with the Sign Program approved for the center. The original marquee sign approved for the theater is proposed to remain. The applicant has not yet suggested how this sign will be utilized. This item is discussed in more detail in the Analysis section of this report. Circulation: Staff has analyzed the site plan with respect to on -site, off -site and pedestrian circulation. There are several areas of concern that are analyzed more fully below. These include access to adjacent parcels via reciprocal access easements /agreements and pedestrian /vehicular access on and through the site from the adjacent (west) residential community. Parking: The proposed development would require approximately 230 parking spaces as follows: Use Parking Required Parking Provided Health Club /Spa 87 26,000 sf /300 Theaters 143 714 500 seats /3.5 (includes 21 (includes 107 compact) compact) Total 230 714 The theater was originally approved with 2,500 fixed seats, which required a total of 714 parking spaces. At that time, 107 compact parking spaces (fifteen percent (15 %) of the required parking spaces for the theater) were permitted, consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. With the smaller theater, a lesser number of compact spaces will be allowed. A condition of approval has been added to require that the parking lot be re- striped to reflect this change. The 484 parking spaces provided beyond Code requirements could be used for future expansion of the center. A small percentage of parking spaces will be lost due to the re- striping of compact spaces, reciprocal access, and ADA /Title 24 (Accessibility) requirements. C00�013 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 4 ANALYSIS Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the following five areas for City Council consideration: • Signs • Vehicular Circulation • Pedestrian Circulation • Landscaping • Proposed Use Signs: There is no proposal for use of the existing theater marquee sign. Staff anticipates that the three - theater cinema would utilize at least a portion of the marquee sign. The use of the marquee sign as well as all other proposed signs would require review and approval by the Community Development Director. If necessary, the Community Development Director may modify the existing Sign Program. Vehicular Circulation: There are several issues with respect to on- and off -site vehicular circulation. Good planning and engineering practice includes the reduction of access points along major streets to minimize traffic conflict and improve traffic flow. Limitations on the number of driveways along Los Angeles Avenue have been a long- standing goal of the City. By providing reciprocal vehicular access across adjacent commercial properties, off -site vehicular circulation is minimized, and traffic flow is improved. By providing vehicular access from the adjacent westerly site through Mission Bell Plaza, vehicles would be able to utilize the traffic signal at the Plaza for eastbound trips. The Community Development Department has on file, a request to amend the General Plan and rezone the parcel to the west for residential purposes. If the general plan designation is changed reciprocal access would not be needed. A special condition has been added. Lassen Avenue terminates on both the east and west sides of Mission Bell Plaza. The on -site access along the rear portion of Mission Bell Plaza, behind the Albertson's market and the theater building is currently without any traffic calming devices, allowing vehicles to speed through the center to east Lassen Avenue. With the increased traffic expected from the approval of these uses staff C00004 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 5 feels that it would be appropriate to have the applicant install a traffic hump, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This would slow the traffic down and improve safety. A special condition has been added. Pedestrian Circulation: Currently, there is vehicular access between this site and the adjacent residential neighborhood to the west at the terminus of Lassen Avenue. However, safe pedestrian access is limited since the public sidewalk terminates at the property line, forcing pedestrians to walk through landscaping and parking areas to reach the pedestrian access to Poindexter Park located at the northern boundary of the Mission Bell Plaza site. This pedestrian access is heavily used by nearby residents for access to the park and as a route to Chaparral Middle School. A paved, clearly delineated connection should be required, connecting the terminus of the sidewalk on Lassen Street to the pedestrian access at Poindexter Park. This would eliminate vehicle and pedestrian conflicts and provide safe pedestrian access to Mission Bell Plaza and Poindexter Park. Additionally, the interface between this site and Poindexter Park should be enhanced with decorative elements that would not only clearly define the park entrance, but would also discourage vehicles from parking and blocking the entrance. Decorative elements could include a combination of decorative paving, boulders, pilasters or bollards. The connection and interface shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. A special condition has been added. Landscaping: The applicant has proposed to construct a pool and decking north of the existing theater building. This area was originally planned for the extension of the theater building and was landscaped in the interim. With the installation of a pool, decking and associated fencing, additional landscaping will be needed. The landscaping should provide screening as well as compliment the architecture. A special condition has been added. Permitted Uses: The floor plan shows rooms for massage services within the locker room area. Section 5.48.020 of the Moorpark Municipal Code requires that the person engaged in the business of acting as a massage technician shall hold a valid massage technician license duly issued by the sheriff. A special condition has been added. CO-3005 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and two Addenda were previously prepared for the approved CPD (Mission Bell Plaza and Greenleaf Apartments). The existing documentation fully addresses the components of the Zoning Ordinance related to changes of land use within the existing project. The California Environmental Quality Act allows the preparation of an EIR Addendum when the modifications to a project would not require major revisions to the EIR, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The decision to prepare an Addendum must be supported by substantial evidence. In this case, tenant improvements and a change in use would occur within and adjacent to an existing building. No significant impacts from this modification are expected. The application and its exhibits, along with the City Council staff report, provide sufficient and substantial evidence to constitute a third Addendum to the Mission Bell Plaza EIR. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Major Modification 3 to Commercial Planned Development 89 -01 subject to Conditions of Approval. Attachments: 1. Site Map 2. Draft City Council Resolution approving Major Modification 3 to Commercial Planned Development 89 -1, with Conditions of Approval. 3. Architectural Exhibits (Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations) A � WALNUT CANYON 1 HIGH ST. INDEXTER ( TO WY 118) -� SITE LASS T. a CL ui 5 oc �1 Z 0 l TO FWY 101) LOS ANGELF-S !X AYE. X a cl M 00 LU M w Om Jm 2 SITE MAP ATTACHMENT 1 00000 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 3 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1989 -01 LOCATED AT 543 W. LOS ANGELES AVENUE, ON THE APPLICATION OF MOORPARK CLUB, LLC. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 511 -0- 080 -645) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 6 2002, the City Council considered Major Modification No. 3 to Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 1989 -01 on the application of Moorpark Club LLC. to allow tenant improvements in an existing theater building to construct a +26,000 square foot fitness /sports club with a +8,500 square foot, three theater cinema, with a 500 seat maximum, and an outdoor swimming pool with decking and fencing, located at 543 W. Los Angeles Avenue within Mission Bell Plaza, (Assessor Parcel Nos. 511 -0- 080 -545); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of November 6, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, and closed the public hearing. WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and public testimony has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that the aforementioned Major Modification to the CPD is consistent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and two Addenda were previously prepared for the approved Commercial Planned Development (Mission Bell Plaza and Greenleaf Apartments). The change of use will not result in a significant physical change in the environment and therefore, does not require any further environmental documentation. The application and its exhibits, along with the City Council staff report, provide sufficient and substantial evidence to constitute a third Addendum to the Mission Bell Plaza EIR. SECTION 3. COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth above, it has been determined that this application with the special conditions and attached standard conditions of approval meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: ATTACHMENT 2 r� Ii Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 A. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan, and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. B. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. C. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. D. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. E. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves Major Modification 3 to CPD 1989 -01: A. Subject to the following special conditions of approval: 1. All findings and conditions of CPD No. 1989 -01 and 1989 -02 and all subsequent Minor or Major Modifications shall remain binding and in full force, except as modified by these conditions. 2. All uses and activities, except as shown in Attachment 2 of the agenda report, shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Community Development Director and consistent with applicable Zoning Code provisions. 3. No more than fifteen percent (150) of the required parking spaces for the 500 seat theater shall be compact parking spaces, consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Prior to occupancy, the parking lot shall be re- striped to reflect this change. All compact parking spaces shall be labeled with the words "COMPACT ONLY" at the rear of the parking space adjacent to the aisle. The lettering shall be 8- inches high. 4. All proposed signs, including use of the marquee sign shall be reviewed and subject to approval by the Community Development Director. If necessary, the Community Development Director may modify the existing Sign Program. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc C OOD019 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 3 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the theater and fitness /sport complex a reciprocal access agreement recorded between this development and the currently unimproved commercially zoned parcel to the west. The agreement shall specify the location, width, maintenance and other appurtenant details of access. The agreement shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and the Community Development Director. Once approved and executed, the agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Ventura County Recorder. Should the adjacent parcel to the west be rezoned for residential use prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, no reciprocal access agreement shall be necessary. 6. A paved, clearly delineated connection shall be required, connecting the terminus of the sidewalk on Lassen Street to the pedestrian access at Poindexter Park. The interface between the site and Poindexter Park shall be enhanced with decorative elements that will not only clearly define the park entrance, but will also discourage vehicles from parking and blocking the entrance. Decorative elements could include a combination of decorative paving, boulders, pilasters or bollards. The connection and interface shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 7. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the Permittee shall provide the Community Development Director with proof that person(s) engaged in, conducting or carrying on the business of acting as a massage technician hold(s) a valid massage technician license duly issued by the sheriff consistent with Section 5.48.020 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 8. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the applicant shall install a speed hump, the design and installation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, shall be installed in the travel aisle located at the rear of the theater and Albertson's market buildings. 9. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a landscape plan for review and approval along with the required fees for review and inspection. The landscape plan shall provide calculations which prove that the landscaping provided meets the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The landscaping shall include planting to screen /obsure the northern wall, screen the pool area and to enhance the S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Page 4 entrance to the Park. Approval of the landscape plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. B. Subject to the standard conditions of approval in Exhibit A (Standard Conditions of Approval) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Standard Conditions of Approval S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Page 5 EXHIBIT A STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 3 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 1989 -01 PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The Permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and /or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 2. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The Permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) business days after notification. 3. This permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations on file in the Community Development Department office. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations on file in the Community Development Department Office, except or unless otherwise indicated in the special conditions included in the resolution, or herein in the following conditions. All proposed uses of these buildings shall require the issuance of a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. The Department may determine that certain uses will require other types of entitlements or environmental assessment. 4. This development is subject to all applicable regulations of the CPD Zone, and all requirements and enactments of Federal, State, Ventura County, City authorities, and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 5. In the event that the uses for which the CPD Permit as approved is determined to be abandoned, the City of Moorpark may, at its discretion, initiate revocation procedures for cause per the provisions of Section 17.44.080. For purposes of this condition, "abandoned" shall mean a cessation of a business or businesses which would render the business unavailable to the public for a period of 180 or more consecutive days. Initiation of revocation procedures may S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc s-, A .1-4 ID.J.a. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 6 result in the revocation of the permit or modification of the permit based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. 6. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 7. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 8. The Permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his /her sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve Permittee of his /her obligation under this condition. 9. In order to determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for and receive a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. 10. Prior to commencement of any use approved under this permit, the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building and Safety Department shall be required. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the Permittee has provided a faithful performance surety. At the discretion of the Community Development Director and upon the posting of surety by the Permittee, said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the surety may be exonerated. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the Community Development Director shall declare the surety forfeited. 11. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator (s) of the subject building, the current or new owner shall file the name (s) and addresses) of the new owner(s), lessee (s) or operator (s) with the Community Development Department. The S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Page 7 change of ownership. letter shall include an acknowledgement that the new owner agrees with all conditions of this permit. 12. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zoning Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the Permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Community Development Director shall be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area and the terms and conditions of this permit, and to determine if a Minor or Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit is required. A new Zoning Clearance shall be required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. 13. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Permittee shall provide proof to the Building Division that all contractors doing work in Moorpark have a valid Business Registration Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. B. BUILDING AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 14. Final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, building colors and materials, sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of any permit and prior to any construction. 15. Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if the Permittee can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one (1) year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be made in writing to the Community Development Director, at least thirty (30) -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 16. Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Page 8 17. Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until the Permittee has provided proof of compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials as required by the Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District. 18. The Permittee and his /her successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) business days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 19. The Permittee shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all City legal service fees prior to Community Development Department or City Engineer's Office initiation of work on Condition Compliance. The Permittee shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements of the latest adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits and shall be required to pay all outstanding condition compliance costs prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit. 20. The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance." The Permittee shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the Permittee fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). 21. If skylights are used, the material utilized shall be designed so as to minimize the light from the inside of the building to the exterior. Skylights are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. 22. All roof - mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Community Development Director may request that a noise study, prepared by a licensed Acoustical Engineer in accordance with acceptable engineering standards, be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Page 9 noise generation sources will be mitigated to the required level 23. All parking space and loading bay striping shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible during the life of the development. Prior to any restriping of the parking lot a zoning clearance shall be obtained. 24. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall be maintained at all times to insure safe access and use by employees, public agencies and service vehicles. 25. No clearing, grading, erosion control or installation of temporary or permanent irrigation, landscape, hardscape or related structures or construction of improvements of sewer, water, storm drain, streets, or dry utilities shall occur until the City Engineer and the Community Development Director provide written concurrence that all requirements have been fulfilled for the phase of construction under consideration. 26. Permittee shall pay all plan check and inspection fees, case processing fees and deposits per the City's fee /deposit schedule in effect at the time that review is provided by the City. Permittee shall also process and obtain City, County, State and all other public or private agency approvals and permits for any work to be performed within their respective properties or areas of interest. City approval of the Plans does not warrant that other public agency requirements or standards have been met. It is the Permittee's responsibility to satisfy all requirements of, and to obtain the written approval for each phase from all public agencies having jurisdiction and to provide verification to the City Engineer and the Community Development Director of such prior to commencement of the work allowed by this Agreement. 27. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Plans as noted previously on these conditions, all applicable City standards and regulations, all applicable conditions required and all accepted construction practices, as determined by the City Engineer, without exception. 28. Should the Plans prove to be inadequate in any respect to federal, state or local law with respect to the Clean Water Act and other such laws, as determined by City in its sole discretion, then Permittee shall make such changes as are necessary to ensure, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that such improvements are performed in accordance S: \Community Development \= PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc 0 ��1'1 v +.F ie Resolution No. 2002 - Page 10 with said City standards and regulations in effect at the time of construction of the improvements. 29. The City Engineer or his /her duly authorized representative, upon request of Permittee, shall inspect the Improvements. As the City determines Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall accept the Improvements as complete. 30. At all times during the construction of Improvements, Permittee shall take all such precautions as may be necessary to limit access to the site to authorized persons only and to protect the site from all members of the public and protect all public and adjacent private property from debris and damage. 31. Permittee shall guarantee against defective plans, labor and materials for a period of one year following City acceptance of the Improvements as complete. 32. In the event any of the Improvements are determined to be defective within the time provided herein, Permittee shall repair, replace, or reconstruct the defect without delay and without cost or expense to City and shall pay all City costs for plan check, inspection and the City's Administrative Costs related to this requirement within thirty (30) days after receipt of City's invoice. Should Permittee fail to act promptly or in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph, or should the exigencies of the situation require that repair, replacement or reconstruction work to be performed before Permittee can be notified, City may, at its option, make or cause to be made the necessary repair, replacement or reconstruction. Permittee and its surety shall be obligated to pay City for the actual cost of such work together with the City's Administrative Costs. 33. Permittee shall keep accurate records on a set of blue lined prints of all City approved additions to and deletions from the work, and of all changes in location, elevation and character of the work, not otherwise shown or noted on the Plan. Prior to the City's inspection and acceptance of the Improvements, Permittee shall transfer this information to a final set of record drawings and deliver them to the City Engineer for final approval and retention. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \1989 -01 Mission Bell \Maj Mod 3 \resolutions \cc 021016 f.doc -1,A'Y3�Y eI va{ 'as � �+ .�. 8% JOEL I. CANTOR AIA • ARCHRECT 3.40 BRANNAN STREET SUITE 11 AN FRANCISCO ' CA 94107 4159579755 NaRTH W 0-1 + + ZL rA tT 5: 1;0 . avATIOH ve I uu &W-L of.bo"Is-ll 4NIIII-d bl".Wa .W's (3) A JOEL B. CAMI AlA ARCHTECT 3405RANNANStiffr SURE NI SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 p, A159579755 Iff L All, oinloWniOlor 0. .I JOEL R. CANTOR ALA ARCNRECT 1 J _ NO 9RANNAN STREET SURE 401 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 .15 957 9755 it J (FEL kU 1 a`� I 0 7 pet.,, � E 2 r. Sep 27 02 04:12p EPI`' Enterprises FROM : JOEL P. CANTOR AIA ARCHITECT FAX NO. : 415 9571677 925 "A3 9992 p.2 Jun. 19 2882 11:26AM P1 t n� tl V` v g0 11 D 9 V o()Dtu#�w NOV ub ue UJ:bup Real Estate Department File A'a 2074.0028 ITEM to • KULIK, GOTTE SMAN & MOUTON, LLP Via Facsimile (805)529 -8270 Attorneys at Law Comerica Bank Building 15303 Ventura Boulevard Suite 1400 Sherman Oaks, Calif orrlia 91403 November 6, 2002 The Honorable Mayor Patrick Hunter Mr. Barry K. Hogan City of Moorpark Community Development Director 799 Moorpark Avenue City of Moorpark Moorpark, California 93021 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Mr. Scott Wolfe Principal Planner City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: Maior Modification No. 32CPD No. 89 -01 (Mission Bell Plaza) Dear Mayor Hunter and Messrs. Hogan and Wolfe: Telephone (310) 557.9200 (818) 817 -3600 Facsimile (310) 557 -0224 kmuton@kmlaw.com Our law offices represent Mission Bell Plaza, LLC which owns the Mission Bell Plaza shopping center at Los Angeles Avenue and Park Lane. Tonight, the Moorpark City Council will consider application of Moorpark Club LLC to take the bankrupt former Regal Cinema space in the Mission Bell Plaza and convert a portion of the premises to a neighborhood serving health and fitness gym. We are advised that the conversion of a portion of the bankrupt theater space to a health and fitness center is eagerly anticipated by the community. Unfortunately, the City has seized upon this community serving change in use application as an opportunity to illegally impose upon the shopping center owner a condition favoring a neighboring property owner which has no reasonable relationship to the proposed health facility. Specifically, City planning staff has imposed upon Moorpark Club LLC's application a condition that Mission Bell Plaza, LLC grant to and obtain from the adjacent property owner a reciprocal easement agreement that would permit vehicles to transverse the Mission Bell Plaza shopping center and the adjacent vacant lot. The illegality of the imposition of this condition to this specific application is based on the fact that there is no reasonable connection between the reciprocal easement condition and any "burdens" imposed by the change in use. The lack of the required "nexus" is evident in the p.2 Nov 06 02 03:50p KULIK, GOTTMMAN & MOUTON, LLP November 6, 2002 Page 2 planning staff report. The staff report candidly admits that it has long been the desire of the City to obtain a reciprocal easement agreement from the owner of the Mission Bell Plaza shopping center for the benefit of the adjacent undeveloped parcel. As City staff knows, Mission Bell Plaza, LLC respectfully declined a request from the City several years ago to grant the very same reciprocal easement agreement which is now being imposed as a condition on the modification application. Mission Bell Plaza, LLC declined the invitation for reasons relating to shopping center identification, adverse traffic flow, liability prevention and esthetics. The fact that the reciprocal easement agreement has long been the goal of the City and was requested several years ago rather obviously makes the point that there is nothing about this particular land use application that is reasonably related to the reciprocal easement agreement condition. Furthermore, the "burdens" of the proposed project will be less than those which existed under the Regal Cinema use. Specifically, the proposed change in use will result in approximately 500 fewer cars ear da . California case law clearly prohibits the imposition of the reciprocal easement condition under these circumstances (see for example Rohn v. Visalia) and the nexus requirement has been codified in California Government Code Section 65909. In conclusion, Mission Bell Plaza, LLC supports the proposed modification and all conditions thereto with the sole exception of the reciprocal easement agreement condition. We respectfully submit that the imposition of the illegal reciprocal easement agreement condition would, amongst other things, constitute a violation of our client's constitutional rights and would permit it to seek damages from the City. KYM:aw Sincerely, �64�J. Kent Y. Mouton, Esq. KULIK, GOTTESMAN & MOUTON, LLP p.3 ITEM ?• J3- �r 1l-C1c-'CG�_ MOORPARK CITY COUNC I LACT- �°": *nylcE Sr�cE{ �con�mr x�' �vn AGENDA REPORT 1v ��c�� s� 3a �C� Ca�4� �ntrC cC- cle-b fir., TO: Honorable City Council �2�IV for 1-�t reacaino 'i- ---Lel adov r6r, c &t mecca -�c� 5 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Di recto Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Fl: `�7crc«Liv, -- DATE: October 22, 2002 (CC meeting of 11/6/02) SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change No. 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, for a Change in Land Use Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential) , Zone Change from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD 9.1 Dwelling Units /Acre, the Addition of 3 -Lots to an Approved 22 -Lot Single - Family Residential Subdivision, and the Construction of 3- Single Family Detached Affordable Units, Located at the Northwest Corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company and the City of Moorpark. BACKGROUND These projects comprise a change in the boundary of TTM No. 5307, to include and subdivide an additional 0.33 acres to provide three affordable housing units in support of the General Plan Housing Element. This addition requires a Major Modification to the TTM and a Minor Modification to the RPD Permit. The additional property will also require a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change. Approval of the subject requests will enable the 0.33 acre site to be incorporated into a compatible single family detached neighborhood, which would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. The approval of these projects and subsequent construction of the units will also accomplish City Departmental Goal B -9 that has been established by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. Approval of a general plan amendment for affordable housing does not count against the limitation of four annual general plan amendments. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc C00 ®23 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 2 On May 1, 2002, the City Council approved a request by Colmer Development Company for TTM No. 5307, RPD Permit No. 2001 -01, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Variance (VAR) No. 2002 -01, and introduced Zone Change No. 2001 -01 for first reading. These approvals included the subdivision of +2.44 acres into 22- single family residential lots and the construction of 22- single family units (including three affordable units) located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. On May 7, 2002, Colmer Development Company submitted an application for a Major Modification to the Tract and Minor Modification to the RPD Permit to include an additional 0.33 acres located at the northwest corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, to the east and directly adjacent to the approved project. The City Council, on October 2, 2002, initiated General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04 and Zone Change 2002 -04 for this 0.33 acre site. On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed addition to the Map, along with the required accompanying projects. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Modification to the Tentative Tract Map and Modification to the Residential Planned Development, subject to conditions of approval, which are attached to the draft resolution accompanying this report. The proposed modifications, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will allow this property to be included within the tract, subdivided to a size consistent with other lots in the tract, and developed with a housing product similar to the other lots in the tract. These additional lots will be required to be maintained as "affordable" units. DISCUSSION General Plan Amendment The current land use designation for the subject property is M (Medium Density Residential). The M designation allows a maximum density of 4 residential units per acre. The proposed General Plan Amendment to VH (Very High Residential) would allow for a maximum density of 15 units per acre, although the proposed density is just over 9 units per acre. The proposed change in Land Use designation would permit the incorporation of the subject site into the development pattern of Tract 5307. The subject site is disconnected from the development S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc C 1913 . 1 Al Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 3 pattern of the medium density neighborhoods to the north and east, as they are oriented differently. This change of designation would serve to better incorporate the property into the proposed neighborhood to the west. Perhaps the most significant justification for the amendment of the Land Use designation is the furtherance of the goals of the Housing Element, which identify a need for affordable housing. The Element also identifies Tract No. 5307 as a potential site for affordable units. The addition of this property to create three additional affordable units also meets an established goal of the City Council. Zone Change A change of zone is necessary for the addition of the subject property to TTM No. 5307. The minimum lot size for the existing R -1 zone is 6,000 square feet. The proposed lot sizes for TTM No. 5307 range from 3,305 to 4,478 square feet. Creating lots which are of a comparable size to the main part of the TTM No. 5307 requires a zone change to the RPD -9.lu (Residential Planned Development - 9.1 dwelling units per acre), as the resulting density on the subject property will be 9.1 units per acre. The RPD zone allows lots smaller than 6,000 square feet in conjunction with an RPD permit. This permit also analyses site design and building design, and allows projects to be proposed and built which do not fit into the rigid standards of the R -1 zone. This is particularly useful when dealing with in -fill type properties with small dimensions or other significant constraints. In the case of Tract 5307, the property fronting on Los Angeles Avenue is relatively long and narrow. The creation of Tract 5307 required the flexibility that the RPD zone offers. While the RPD zone offers a degree of flexibility to overcome constraints, it still maintains development standards, which will ensure compatibility between the lots within the zone and the adjacent R -1 zoned properties. Tract 5307 - Major Modification No. 1 TTM No. 5307, as originally proposed, would create 22 -lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet. The tract utilized a small lot approach that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is offset 5 -feet from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a 5 -foot wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of 5- S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc i llk)r1, �3t Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 4 feet but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this 5 -feet for driveway and yard purposes. The proposed Major Modification to the tract incorporates the subject 0.33 acres into the tract. The proposed lots require adequate access and turn around space; however, access to Millard was determined inappropriate by earlier analysis. Therefore, the lots proposed will be somewhat narrower and deeper than the other lots in the subdivision, with access gained by means of an extended shared driveway, twenty (20) feet in width, extending to the most easterly lot, but not connecting to Millard Avenue. The turn - around for the entire tract will be at the entry to the shared driveway and will take the form of a "hammerhead," or a pair of turn pockets which give large vehicles the distance required to negotiate a 180 degree, three point turn. An easement for storm drain purposes also crosses the subject property along its western edge. This easement contains an open channel in which storm water is conveyed to an underground storm drain system. This easement will remain, as there is still a need to convey the storm and nuisance water from the areas currently draining to the channel. However, the proposed project will fill in the channel and convey the water via a forty -eight inch (48 ") storm drain pipe. The easement area will then become part of the usable side yard of Lot 23. RPD Permit 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1 The modifications to this permit also reflect the addition of the subject property to TTM No. 5307. The new lots are proposed to be developed with the Plan 3 building footprint as proposed in the original RPD permit. This plan was utilized on three lots, and was not a part of the paired "Z" lot combination, which utilizes Plan 1 and Plan 2 homes. Plan 3 is used on those lots, which are to be designated as affordable units in the Low Income and Very Low Income categories. The Plan 3 footprint also reflects a narrow home design which is more appropriate for the narrower lots which are proposed to comprise the subject property. The three residential units propose rear yards adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, and are therefore expected to experience noise impacts similar to those identified with the original RPD approval. As such, the Mitigated Negative Declaration requires, and the recommended conditions of approval reflect, the same noise mitigation measures as the lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue in the existing tract map. These measures include the installation of a sound wall of sufficient height to mitigate the outdoor ambient noise levels in the yard areas of the new lots. They also address S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 5 interior ambient noise levels and require the installation of appropriate hardware and the use of appropriate materials and construction techniques to adequately reduce the interior noise to acceptable levels. Aside from the addition of the new lots, another modification to this RPD permit is the alteration of the design of the tract perimeter wall /sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The current design includes "round pockets" along the length of the wall where trees or other landscaping can be planted. Staff feels that this design is not the best choice for this location. Staff concerns include maintenance issues inside the pockets, aesthetics, and security issues that can arise out of the use of pockets. As an alternative, staff is recommending the use of decorative masonry block with substantial articulation in the form of pilaster -like features, a cap course, variations in height, and other texturing of the surface to soften its impact along the roadway. A raised landscaping strip sufficiently wide to permit the planting of appropriate tree species would be provided between the sidewalk area and the wall, which would help to reduce the appearance of the overall height of the wall. These amendments and modifications would, if approved, allow the construction of three affordable units in support of the adopted City Council goals, as well as goals of the Housing Element of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared for the projects. Impacts associated with this project are nearly identical to those described in the MND for the original Tract 5307, and are primarily noise impacts. These impacts are due to the proximity of the project to Los Angeles Avenue. While potentially significant, this impact can be mitigated by the construction of a sound wall along the rear property lines of the lots to be created, and by the use of construction techniques and materials which can reduce the interior sound levels to acceptable levels. The mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project conditions. This is the same mitigation as is required in the original Tract 5307. A copy of the MND in included in the attached October 14, 2002, Planning Commission Agenda Report, for the City Council's review. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. S: \Community Development \= PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 6 2. Adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04. 4. Introduce Zoning Ordinance No. for first reading. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Tract 5307 - Major Modification No. 1, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Agenda Report (with Project Exhibits and Mitigated Negative Declaration) 2. Draft Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04 3. Draft Ordinance Approving Zone Change 2002 -04 4. Draft Resolution Approving Tract 5307 - Major Modification No. 1, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1, with Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) . S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \cc 021106 stf rpt f.doc Clara -3'0 MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable Planning Commission From: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director✓ Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Date: September 26, 2002 (PC meeting of 10/14/02) Subject: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change No. 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, a Request for a Change in Land Use Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential), Zone Change from R- 1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD 9.1 Dwelling Units /Acre, the Addition of Three Lots to an Approved 22- Lot Single - Family Residential Subdivision, and the Construction of Three Single Family Detached Affordable Units, on Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company and the City of Moorpark. BACKGROUND These projects comprise a change in the boundary of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, to include and subdivide an additional 0.33 acres to provide three affordable housing units in support of the General Plan Housing Element. This addition requires a Major Modification to the tentative tract map and a Minor Modification to the Residential Planned Development Permit. The additional property will also require a General Plan Amendment and a Zone Change. Approval of the subject requests will enable the 0.33 acre site to be incorporated into a compatible single family detached neighborhood, which would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. The approval of these projects and subsequent construction of the units will also accomplish City Departmental Goal B -9 that has been established by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. CC ATTACHMENT 1 S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc 'A��01� C Honorable Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Page 2 On May 1, 2002, the City Council approved a request by Colmer Development Company for Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 5307, Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit No. 2001 -01, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Variance (VAR) No. 2002 -01, and introduced Zone Change No. 2001 -01 for first reading. These approvals included the subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two (22) single family residential lots and the construction of twenty -two (22) single family units located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. On May 7, 2002, Colmer Development Company submitted an application for a Major Modification to the Tract and Minor Modification to the RPD Permit to include an additional 0.33 acres located at the northwest corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, to the east and directly adjacent to the approved project. The City Council, on October 2, 2002, initiated General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04 and Zone Change 2002 -04 for this 0.33 acre site. The modifications propose a subdivision of 0.33 acres into three residential lots to be developed with three (3) affordable housing units, with the same architecture used in the original subdivision. The current General Plan Land Use Element Map designation for the 0.33 -acre site is Medium Density Residential (4 units per acre) and the zoning is R -1, with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. A General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential))and a Zone Change (ZC) to change the zoning designation from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD 9.1 Dwelling Units /Acre are necessary for the proposed development. The proposed modifications, GPA and ZC will allow this property to be included within the tract, subdivided to a size consistent with other lots in the tract, and developed with a housing product similar to the other lots in the tract. These additional lots will be required to be maintained as `affordable" units. nT-grTTCCT[)TQ General Plan Amendment The current land use designation for the subject property is M (Medium Density Residential). The M designation allows a maximum density of 4 residential units per acre. The proposed General Plan Amendment to VH (Very High Residential) would allow for a maximum density of 15 units per acre, although the proposed density is just over 9 units per acre. S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc 41,ft „-11 Honorable Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Page 3 The proposed change in Land Use designation would permit the incorporation of the subject site into the development pattern of Tract 5307. The subject site is disconnected from the development pattern of the medium density neighborhoods to the north and east, as they are oriented differently. This change of designation would serve to better incorporate the property into the proposed neighborhood to the west. Perhaps the most significant justification for the amendment of the Land Use designation is the furtherance of the goals of the Housing Element, which identify a need for affordable housing. The Element also identifies Tract No. 5307 as a potential site for affordable units. The addition of this property to create three additional affordable units also meets an established goal of the City Council. Zone Chance A change of zone is necessary for the addition of the subject property to TTM No. 5307. The minimum lot size for the existing R -1 zone is 6,000 square feet. The proposed lot sizes for TTM No. 5307 range from 3305 to 4478 square feet. Creating lots which are of a comparable size to the main part of the TTM No. 5307 requires a zone change to the RPD -9.lu (Residential Planned Development - 9.1 dwelling units per acre), as the resulting density on the subject property will be 9.1 units per acre. The RPD zone allows lots smaller than 6,000 square feet in conjunction with an RPD permit. This permit also analyses site design and building design, and allows projects to be proposed and built which do not fit into the rigid standards of the R -1 zone. This is particularly useful when dealing with in -fill type properties with small dimensions or other significant constraints. In the case of Tract 5307, the property fronting on Los Angeles Avenue is relatively long and narrow. The creation of Tract 5307 required the flexibility that the RPD zone offers. While the RPD zone offers a degree of flexibility to overcome constraints, it still maintains development standards which will ensure compatibility between the lots within the zone and the adjacent R -1 zoned properties. Tract 5307 - Malor Modification #1 Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, as originally proposed, would create twenty -two lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet. The tract utilized a small lot approach that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is offset 5 S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc Honorable Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Page 4 feet from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a 5' wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this 5 feet for driveway and yard purposes. The proposed Major Modification to the tract incorporates the subject 0.33 acres into the tract. The proposed lots require adequate access and turn around space; however, access to Millard was determined inappropriate by earlier analysis. Therefore, the lots proposed will be somewhat narrower and deeper than the other lots in the subdivision, with access gained by means of an extended shared driveway, twenty (20) feet in width, extending to the most easterly lot, but not connecting to Millard Avenue. The turn - around for the entire tract will be at the entry to the shared driveway and will take the form of a "hammerhead," or a pair of turn pockets which give large vehicles the distance required to negotiate a 180 degree, three point turn. An easement for storm drain purposes also crosses the subject property along its western edge. This easement contains an open channel in which storm water is conveyed to an underground storm drain system. This easement will remain, as there is still a need to convey the storm and nuisance water from the areas currently draining to the channel. However, the proposed project will fill in the channel and convey the water via a forty -eight inch (48 ") storm drain pipe. The easement area will then become part of the usable side yard of Lot 23. RPD Permit 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1 The modifications to this permit also reflect the addition of the subject property to TTM No. 5307. The new lots are proposed to be developed with the Plan 3 building footprint as proposed in the original RPD permit. This plan was utilized on three lots, and was not a part of the paired "Z" lot combination which utilizes Plan 1 and Plan 2 homes. Plan 3 is used on those lots which are to be designated as affordable units in the Low Income and Very Low Income categories. The Plan 3 footprint also reflects a narrow home design which is more appropriate for the narrower lots which are proposed to comprise the subject property. The three residential units propose rear yards adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, and are therefore expected to experience noise impacts similar to those identified with the original RPD approval. As such, the Mitigated Negative Declaration requires, and the recommended conditions of approval reflect, the same noise mitigation measures as the lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue in S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc g"a4� {j�j -1 �.+ 19 'a. +l tF' c� ti9 Honorable Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Page 5 the existing tract map. These measures include the installation of a sound wall of sufficient height to mitigate the outdoor ambient noise levels in the yard areas of the new lots. They also address interior ambient noise levels and require the installation of appropriate hardware and the use of appropriate materials and construction techniques to adequately reduce the interior noise to acceptable levels. Aside from the addition of the new lots, another modification to this RPD permit is the alteration of the design of the tract perimeter wall /sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The current design includes "round pockets" along the length of the wall where trees or other landscaping can be planted. Staff feels that this design is not the best choice for this location. Staff concerns include maintenance issues inside the pockets, aesthetics, and security issues that can arise out of the use of pockets. As an alternative, staff is recommending the use of decorative masonry block with substantial articulation in the form of pilaster -like features, a cap course, variations in height, and other texturing of the surface to soften its impact along the roadway. A raised landscaping strip sufficiently wide to permit the planting of appropriate tree species would be provided between the sidewalk area and the wall, which would help to reduce the appearance of the overall height of the wall. These amendments and modifications would, if approved, allow the construction of three affordable units in support of the adopted City Council goals, as well as goals of the Housing Element of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared for the projects. Impacts associated with this project are nearly identical to those described in the MND for the original Tract 5307, and are primarily noise impacts. These impacts are due to the proximity of the project to Los Angeles Avenue. While potentially significant, this impact can be mitigated by the construction of a sound wall along the rear property lines of the lots to be created, and by the use of construction techniques and materials which can reduce the interior sound levels to acceptable levels. The mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project conditions. This is the same mitigation as is required in the original Tract 5307. A copy of the MND has been attached for the Planning Commission's review. S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc , Honorable Planning Commission October 14, 2002 Page 6 STAFF RECOM4ENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval. 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Tract 5307 - Major Modification No. 1, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Exhibits • Revised Tentative Tract Map • Revised Plot Plan • Revised Grading Plan • Revised Drainage Plan 2. Draft Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Tract 5307 - Major Modification No.l, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 - Minor Modification No. 1, with Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). 3. Mitigated Negative Declaration S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Staff Reports \pc 021014 stf rpt Colmer.doc C Q& 013--S ■ W V1 w FLORY AVENUE NUAARD STREET , TYPICAL STREET SECTION, TYPXAL STREET SECTION LOT ABLA T—p Lot Nu A o" 11 MR wll I! left ,f lYt 0 an aMAL lum OTALAM. "7 ATE.RTmw TRACTNO.3S37-3 —7_—.,YLT�AcWm W I lit MAPPING. !V, -4 SECTION A-A LOSANGFUSAVENVE YORTgfIf w.1.00RRIIARDIf AICDRMDfnLET(VACATMKAF pm TYPICALSTRMSECTION KTA MAJOR MODIFICATION GINKRAL Pmnx& 1. GROT. AREA ..30" W�ff. - Lm Am AAEAOFLO" "m A, fZ1 AREA r)-,w LA AVE MDEWNO 3.701 LANDSCAft ST - 3161s IFMANAGEEASWT. -1 1.12$ ' UTAt ARIA 26.� � L ARLAS SU�ARICATAKIA"ORNMOL uxuwm ZOMM " raora=20pack an ♦ ALLPWFORLR M�wRROAumu" FMMJM§4&RW=WW"0ffTff"AROWLAWV=1nU CIX L ALL rb0@00 WIPRGWRIiln A NURANTNUCIM AM PRNLIIMYV ASO SWAWF TO CEAPMRW 90" NOMCPL WQRARRt &9MM4=CQNC1rMALnAX1V0RGMWW� • Ummom QU&NIVM AM 80AMMIR 39VKML IL ALL�FRI VOKWILMMIPAVMG.WACMJfMI.CW_79Iff 51. A rTRLLT TWM TO la MV MR LACE LOT. tWATMN WLL 09 W FRONT YARD WffN 9XACT 941CATIM TOR WnMWWV LAT A.4, ...... A c ffJIRRRLwYUAYRR�W V. Rls is "A" STREET TMCAL STREET SECTION SECTION smu 0.1c, Jill 1111!j TIT" CITY OF MOORPARK wvvzwxmummmG/SR ISHE SM PAY"" CALASAW TENTATIVE & DICYlLophow 110=114 I TRACT NO 5307 / nw- CALA&VASCA."M SINGLE FAMUM RESIDENTIAL FWUPOS11 TRACTNO.3S37-3 —7_—.,YLT�AcWm 0, MULTt-FAMILYUMS — -------- MAPPING. !V, YORTgfIf w.1.00RRIIARDIf AICDRMDfnLET(VACATMKAF pm MAJOR MODIFICATION CAUTM0 I.A. polo .. ftI TIT" CITY OF MOORPARK wvvzwxmummmG/SR ISHE SM PAY"" CALASAW TENTATIVE & DICYlLophow 110=114 I TRACT NO 5307 / nw- CALA&VASCA."M SINGLE FAMUM RESIDENTIAL FWUPOS11 - a r i au k i r• F K ` ,w y - - -- - - -•_. _ ._ter'._' 1_ ` VA ..i,..a.:.Y::... -- — o II I r •w•s•eL•r aw y r . - -4• a.in.. m 4.•w., L1.w{ .�.1 ,. , rnr Ly a n.mn ! ,') n s.a . '_ .�' - ,!' 1 � �� ? ' I C MAN IA �C I - .... •atil' W lM° .. L i !. rn> N° °n.. N�10.r ,` . �rl� -•�Y -. __ -- 1-- 1, 'N ' •Y �. u r �LAN�3B N°ar I MAN 2A N.w ALAN 3C TLAN1IA -ALAN 2C�,i �. JI :. :t i f'� -/• .' 1 .i i rMr r rwrlu ... °_ wm +• Nos >. � I .. ..? I i .• • ' __ --f� - it ` , Hnrnr. � 22 _= I 121 20 Vii# jB ! 17 _ lc S I• �+ / J `r j wrP . I w 4 � 9.54 / r, 4 J3 12 •a • ,J N . • I N .n. r STREET • •I 1 4 •rrS 8xy rr. i� jjj n.rna i 1�1 Yi: C i M _ , F>. � ��;�I;, � : 1. i�'-•' �. °,° I �• ( ' _�� 11 ` r ° r 1 I1 M s . : � '�. �.; L \ rM W; " 1 � N•rr4 Mr rrr I '• � I. :.•'1 ra.a. •A I / � t f I rw aell� '..: IK i q' w r ru . ?�T� �� , •. , I !LAN :A s NrrMr = Nr r> ° • ?A rurtr t1 3 I' ` O µ i 11.J' - - �- t w � 1 ?_Ir fns {.° r r' r � •1 - ` I M.AN IB I ` M.A}I 1C _I r !t•AM�A M.AN'1B• J f I bn LU _f-' t' `. " n v • r�.� 'I . I: `.I .` N., •irrY h'S - C 'u, 'L.. °n.° -�• ni' c`" n.ra Y -} n.W el ♦� it c �.� •� a - - _ `w • r ! 1 -- ° I LOS i` "i .. 1 F -... - ANGELES, _ r51= 1 sii - AVE. _ 513 - . "A" STAUT " _ MAJOR MODIFICATION nt.rn+war'CO:.Oa'•+•+'°� LOT J °•'� ( i i w.nr N�i� ° ": �w O MOI•r M ■.Iarlrarrrr.YA•w.■rn r.rwr nMa a,r ouc n•mr I� • t I r �: �` ..aar.ra.arof■w°.tr A...onwAa,.� . ar.• i Mw. ram.°aru ar�n..A a >aA■.M •Mrrr°•ansa•I■rtr L_• c.r.La : � 5!� naerntowranw+rrevwrws .w.Ya. al. rca..LM..■ar. , I � as "w :.:: C : n.. ..._ I. >■■...ayw �� -� ■..� � L41CATM a.. a ■wl.w•wr trrtarMMSrntw I 6 au i �>r ovrfi■a. MtML■ fr MaMt �i. - r1AM7 �� uc I er• 1°°Y a +soi`ri.�os -rwr - • arYnAe MINrt■o.Mrw - ' i wi.�wv M,wnvrnrrwLra x u arrL�w.n' rarrrM•r i ---- ___ � x la•ra LlwrrrfLYrsa•1■wwt RM • e a • Moro •. •r•mMMwgwe ■r r•.u[ ■w�•Q r � I °i0°°°r �N°�°ar� "...ur wrY s1 s _ ti° 1° \wror Wl M7•aOA■.Wr1 " n.r.w•n•...,•wnw.A "racer y artwsr■n rwnrcor.ua } nwiuu •r>orim mr•t torlt itririNO�wns Nns r ,< a.wlstArr M..rr....M■■■ r ALTERNATE B n 1 L 1 ■rrMLl rAr■J.a r.etrs SFA. FMN A-� . Yw°ruiR �w pwt blO l•rML': •rinl•+ N >■w■a trar rraMOa•I■rrrt t _i •rAU, r -Ir =�� .m n.rrrn nrxaY•+r Y I n >rA.Mrron r ■n■�tul■ :rr°..`A ra•• r -n. r11 .m>o•.m oM.rn nn. . /.er 1 Ic >aoA LSY rwnaMOU.rw • .. i r•. w •:r...... `L.""N.•t. «. •°"� e' , • °•'^•• •• ■I■a•4 rnr■•ar ara•INIr•M�wna[ ... nkNl W"•w•r•w•r`�• -.a... • . ank• wr ••, .•M r.nrxs arn• re. .....• rr n. ........ • _ct.. _ • ' —•..•. 4-•- -• PLOT PLAN i «a.. • rMSM /..c..nx�w.v nwnnL r Ir ,:= •I•r•orrtalrra°Mrrrai■ iw M`- 1 / e[ ••.•• "•• •, r I u srtwsnsr ___Km raLar r -s !/. rnrnt nru �• s >rA••talnlr rtnMt�a■. /' caArrM Mnrtarrxr Co. CITY OF MOORPAR.K - iCr�O[W IIICp�lJ1L9cO R ii ■rr■.+n .�.. ux•nr /._ r rY AVCALA to &DCVRL*rbm T OONMSAWM. Wr,. TyP1cAL urovr .Lrratt. TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 I uuM.ruc•.nw l! • ■rmtsaaua . wrawver "�'•`^O"r�+w w..rwi, r• • w' L ""° °1°°'"' FOR SINGLE FwMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES -- w.AM Nri z Z Ali `�� •� A 3 rsw'AU S >z I srr� __ tra.r.eY Y•nT i 1I`!_. 1. ..,. tA71BANYrRN i19 or•N AVC MrufT�l[n rs°aenC7Ylaet •e1 rnY I••�•�... �...�'N �v j'•^o•l�••I,.• 1 4' FLORYAYEM)E MILWRDSfRECI' .._ Ceiw a ✓.7'°O.wY A. w ar' —I =") .,�r.�. ,; TYPICALSTREETSECTION. TYPICAL STREET SECTION rei .Pme•Ta "AN STREET _'ION �.',-Fi ,rP1 :.IfrPTUA� N.i.f. M.Ti c I @i 'vfl li T�s I ' OCAT1ON M" r wit TYPICAL STREET SECTION �W T -Iw 1ST if u uTAaac w1.1. ae 1 PI u•i nonm ua A. SECTION E-E w.u: I. • I. SEcT►oN A -A LOS ANGUM AVENUE TYPICAL MEET SI MON N.71 ,. eNOre�e auAe w.µ I ww•u al. vAw[flal' 'Nr +a lmlro uualnnl ; � :.. ft(IIUT MV ' .All iSNSRAL NOTRI: '.� (4 1 • ) 11AN r. . GNGRS AMA .IYL!llprr. -Lw1AR •A•m�AXKA Let rO'Ir NINPIII•�irr, �- i{ 4 A AM WIDETBNG• f,lri \OIL ALiiTAAWE1rTR1aRQNNI[CAl1al - , Seai1 : .......!..... ... TGTALAIIA IDo" YtA.taIfLR ANNINRN•L ..•. •:.•,,:•• •f "...... '•...• -•.;' LWANNM QLOTANRATANULATM711mRON _- app \ I mRpc7prO: W TWlGO ROr[OI NA yp ... .... ._.. ._ A ..: t ALL PROP06M NNOOGNE AM VNWKNSNIOR GENIRAL NOTLS: GRADING _ M a rb _l L PMIJIYIANT TRLL 30MM MISAm NVIAMnr TAIL CO. L All Nlwe[O MPIOI'WIITApWra11CTIY AIT .... J1�" �.� waarwuT •les xuurc'r ro Liwc[ a rlP.l socY. r:v *...: �. _ c•• ti: ONm Na >•rLYTpN _ •.. • LAaTNIroN1a'+fmnls ,.. �.� ..,.. ... 1OOINRI &AN GVIN 000RR lld NfIr 11.1f. LOCH - _.. .VmrIO'WpmrINfO M/P[FIINIPq PI•MRIrT 1,OCAn1 1O' •Rama aala.c[ ).Nr[r 1M4 ae�o q�wcuM r.Mf A'P'LYO/IT.T Ml7'.PM OlNYf111. 4 O t'MVITPMPASRNRT furPG.e.wG + o nw o ni�M Jl n SOON AZA AINOIOINYNTYn13M1AH. ------'-� w ULT1•TAM1 O.Y UNTCS— ..__•»_._•w•. " - _-.- _ �Ty 1Y. rrrwra.•r.h r..•rro +I++. n•r r. •Y, rM11 CPS PAWWAY CAL.A"SAS. 5� '�fn•cw'• /IM PANKMAY CALArA1As SUBS ITN pepns) xy f NrNINx wnlucai�ki`iaYINYN insorN / enrar•Nra wBLaer A Na Alf>fel IrlN rerfx - 2U(1' �. ..Y.G.. PANG7{.NW PG.,rNN Or1°af• l r7R NOVOIN• ...ANma. ro f:NAw .Loot r..4t NNay. r"nonAr"e 1. re10G14rYK fUI.7Y1[[rAA[D r. aCN•LIWr1V4. IVI ®LJY -_ Al 'Ir •,. ALLPNGPOO°Q ININARMUCTUML AK PNfIDaIAIY ANN NYNJ•r.TM flANGR N11f1LL ROOM IYOIN •lAl•L rforUG1AINY DARD 1W 1. S.ia ..afcNr r.�u Nrrwwnaaa7lY�PI w•Tl.ars a •u YmrlPC mucnw r..ac. atvrl. Y. r7C.TO Y1 j)1(. �t� ifl ��iT'�C iV(. 1 Q�MMA��AL ^AM��, RAN7NOGNK NNBOITY. f. , Ilt:rt t I . 11 t Sr otrlc �1 .max WAWMfLAMMANI►M=WE= a ALL MINIM frEU"VMM VAVW.WACLrI1RV1r_70 M '. Mr Ya•axcrt 'rrrt'•L Rw +rA YABx•C[Y[vKfP 10m. Rome aA�rwNI•Ye01.. t°n.TIPS t I.1'JN'arB)H S:ItI 1)t c b l "1 0 4 ai1pV0• II. ArtNar TICITO r PNOVMD MR RAGS IW. WCATNNI wvt w•crfa �anArrrANITVSa+7sou .. A.In"1 }t�F '!'41T1(1N NRN•Wa TTAY �e.11nACf L*CAT lOYN1 ERL TtwON'. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN �Ty 1Y. rrrwra.•r.h r..•rro +I++. n•r r. •Y, rM11 CPS PAWWAY CAL.A"SAS. 5� '�fn•cw'• /IM PANKMAY CALArA1As SUBS ITN pepns) xy f NrNINx wnlucai�ki`iaYINYN insorN / enrar•Nra wBLaer A Na Alf>fel IrlN rerfx - 2U(1' Lfl+r[a P{YNWIr�rIW ' -_ Al 'Ir •,. W: NG�ara•a� <r1•aa�AT C•uYYf l..Rilac.r°a ..afcNr r.�u Nrrwwnaaa7lY�PI w•Tl.ars NNN e°iM mil^ . INrNS•Ir r1�Y °R.Ne 1 \ LIf LGF]f Rl Vrlf)♦ rlrf�11rL1AROYFONIIMD RBI�NYOBGLrIY1tT N)NI) V IYLIVL I) VU 11 1,1 NAM YIr fA. NBR YIr"�I ". frNc1 IMIN r ...._ UII :TAI. NFC(W In DIU PIN I f. r:.111.1,11111i". TtwON'. rlYar rL MWCN4 f1NNY 488\1 � n f rrlfl \I Prf U•..UI \I' 111 MITI 1.1. 11 .II. III lAI.11I.P•1.. WrWr.4BIrYin IP,N�M,1Peia , v.r1a1e1. iii z yr Jv1UV rt�xx S R -1AT �I TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 001439I ANTS, WC. OR SIIVGLE FAti1ILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSEB 't'°"Np1O S.r.ry i O+r.rr.,r Ab. A fKMt•Gt.� �• w r•... .At.. r S. A..E w.r. A N.r. r!{•. P.aT.r. e... 7YP.A17. SECT. - AIPOIX 107DCAINALF Nor To JCAtr err fErn+, 39't.c. ►.31 d. J..rtnr+. ALT. 107 &MMA11 f0f NrOEJ �N` "�•' Ivor to SCALL . . I� �o T toT it {J w{' 1{y T •A L ]1fa . DrTA[•N<• �LLL w {rail 'YN{ I[o.t D LLO.AYYI[Ow.r[ W[ lOV ry.{r SECTION E-E M•A1L: r - 1r SECTION A-A LOSANCLIN-i AVLNOE TTfICILL STRECT SLC7TON 7r+,f.< —crww - N.Tt rwrr Nrrw DAu �lrrw4aL♦[L VaAf<rA.N�, �` • IOIt TD Yl{f lM rr.. 1y rlifrla.A : Y ,OT R •;,a. 1 trnrt.r PReP. l.Sl.f.P. W�/ORaA rMON tA1i1r1}k 11 I.-,A I11', wa rrNATLLA waRr.t s�GW LLb<f. AT RI• L 11'LARTr1t1ER RIm►Il. LANrIf tOGTr A• N-Lr W T. sr wa Tr oLRAN » w..w0'ww�.:'W /t�ls{%�'A• IO.00LATR[1RVLYTr rO1L1wA1TOO1pOAN "T r w matI. ALYAt►wgwc "'�°w"N��i it Llhl - ■ ALL 117ArOl NgRNA.t,fOR41 A 3'AOL7.OW rOErMWDWI14 l rwrrN. TD WRAIO.G N•Lr wr.ARORAwR. ALL TLROM ORODVM.RIT1O 199RANnKL7Tr.e L TONIaAAr.K ARYLYrRrAY.r1114TfALNMKI[C. r�arlurArtTLRnTOOAwolwTwuLrwaL IAM[.AwunelmAAra.AAn.aNw. = GRAMM AMAwAr CWIMrJALPLAMMGWMR. ♦ ur Rlw..TASLTINM.r,sx r.nrr •Lnc T.w WTONOr QYANRTw. AIR 1OAL1►OL MIVILR 'tea' L ALL IGNITOR EfEW7�.TAVMBACMZM L11.TOr 1• rRAF.G[LTIROD"1t1�\NLRMtAR AatlI[rt. ROTLI tlRR1AR1RNa.lal.rLlOtIOIR TaAfrR Dw. NMAIA RaT.INTNON L AMUT TQL T01i►LOI'Mr M LAO LOT. LOCATOR W" wA1A' 'Riruw oAwa ME IN INI NT TAMP t•TTL BRACT LOCATOX TO LL MRWRRL LAto. a +...... „ 11 ••{w•Mn Atrr.. ��-_ Z4 D �r DwwAaIJtTK —AMAL r—"J SCALE: 1 ". 10 1p11N10RwRw SiNIA W . wN4MOAM ANI N11RI1wMl �ErT10N t%•Q Itp4tOWL 1 V9.7fCAL "AD STREW rII+•rwl. •.n.� L) N r.T1 TYPICAL STRXET S&MON M. Ta �'' . .. '' TRACT NO iS7 C M. .._ __._.. MULTI •FAMILYUNITS— .— __....._.... q vicl.• i i . 3 rr•o• �� 7-CI•<t w1Tr.Lwcai$iluLaolt LAFDLrT aowATA11N IO[RNrrN[LOA.NIM q�Nd�j '1 1fO0aIRARRNOIO0. .I�w, iluomoe� 11�aN•rL •= Y.RAM�Nr CO. r.OAw ARN ROa rr �1N Att I.AAA{[ MN ut.SAAAR —FRN aAaO� RA'A'A_/ A.IN OMN1a anPA.0 INNIMrM1VR11RNNrN.Nf.AD 1 TN AAWI1 aIANRaa1a II0a1DAlar. d•�t OMN[R Ira1w r.RAR NRrAL1Ml Barr N IIANV AvG nwR` .1NA.�VL.MI.V/ rAwAS,uNRt R[L.IYKaAR111�rV I . fNa r.T1a trLR •• •�• JIIIVE/ U t0 HO 12101 160' 2(xi. Dw` Ia.rV i 11,i MAJOR MO'DIF'ICATION ;rt DRAINAGE CONCEPT 14, t . r. aTr4 �TT LEGAL DL.yNIPTInA . �•. MaI NIVIW■ FC ►.11A \D I' AADWDITNLCTIVAIAT1.0t —1 sD. �r IST Moo1rAN1: u s UJL'I\N) \, aAVCT<U UMI. M.A L I1W . b rrI11C1AL AL <'OADSC I.OT-A'UI'DALNITI'MA. IM".L(IF MU \. ,41, GRADING PLAN ,kj.jfj OCKaLf(N IK CMPT\OT VT ?Tb[A. \TiTTU1 r I w.su w. n.• r.r�• n.�a.. { I••.ww. . +, w4• • w{a < • <... w I. ..M~~ COLLLR MGM CO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 /i •- CA4MLAL GLf1TR IFOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOS fLMIR10 SRf s iIODNSULTmm W— OgORLRr10 • rTROO1RRT T DRMLSaar. {ra..r a M.. «Arts Q... L R.—... s...r- A< SD.a N.AR.f 7 AYIOffNGr . SO Vf. (iMI) LNLILLL TIDTTt1 F <Rq 2.Nf • C — OOORAMA - ItLtM IQ7T. - LOT ACL ARIA RLOl1 "A" - •A- WART AREA - )T" L A. AVL SRO- L/H - NOttr YYtAYW.7<tRY.O1C T.t11 TUrALAA1A IM,911 Aa1A- AIaY.AMa1r1AL LOT AREAS MIL LOT ALLATAN&"TMNI LOTl11• LONwR W tLf moNNa m ALLTNOTORO MMRrwNArrONNTMWK GLRRAL NBRLL: GRAOM rrtorlYr TTTIL mONf RtMLOLLT LAVTR TRU CIL L ALL TawOaR aaRrpRNwA■ Oral NO 11rry SATriAlAI o0OTd1 IR1 Rr1A1T Y.NIrC1l0 <�< L I" rTINOa[ QTANTffM rwrr Nrrw DAu �lrrw4aL♦[L VaAf<rA.N�, �` • IOIt TD Yl{f lM rr.. 1y rlifrla.A : Y ,OT R •;,a. 1 trnrt.r PReP. l.Sl.f.P. W�/ORaA rMON tA1i1r1}k 11 I.-,A I11', wa rrNATLLA waRr.t s�GW LLb<f. AT RI• L 11'LARTr1t1ER RIm►Il. LANrIf tOGTr A• N-Lr W T. sr wa Tr oLRAN » w..w0'ww�.:'W /t�ls{%�'A• IO.00LATR[1RVLYTr rO1L1wA1TOO1pOAN "T r w matI. ALYAt►wgwc "'�°w"N��i it Llhl - ■ ALL 117ArOl NgRNA.t,fOR41 A 3'AOL7.OW rOErMWDWI14 l rwrrN. TD WRAIO.G N•Lr wr.ARORAwR. ALL TLROM ORODVM.RIT1O 199RANnKL7Tr.e L TONIaAAr.K ARYLYrRrAY.r1114TfALNMKI[C. r�arlurArtTLRnTOOAwolwTwuLrwaL IAM[.AwunelmAAra.AAn.aNw. = GRAMM AMAwAr CWIMrJALPLAMMGWMR. ♦ ur Rlw..TASLTINM.r,sx r.nrr •Lnc T.w WTONOr QYANRTw. AIR 1OAL1►OL MIVILR 'tea' L ALL IGNITOR EfEW7�.TAVMBACMZM L11.TOr 1• rRAF.G[LTIROD"1t1�\NLRMtAR AatlI[rt. ROTLI tlRR1AR1RNa.lal.rLlOtIOIR TaAfrR Dw. NMAIA RaT.INTNON L AMUT TQL T01i►LOI'Mr M LAO LOT. LOCATOR W" wA1A' 'Riruw oAwa ME IN INI NT TAMP t•TTL BRACT LOCATOX TO LL MRWRRL LAto. a +...... „ 11 ••{w•Mn Atrr.. ��-_ Z4 D �r DwwAaIJtTK —AMAL r—"J SCALE: 1 ". 10 1p11N10RwRw SiNIA W . wN4MOAM ANI N11RI1wMl �ErT10N t%•Q Itp4tOWL 1 V9.7fCAL "AD STREW rII+•rwl. •.n.� L) N r.T1 TYPICAL STRXET S&MON M. Ta �'' . .. '' TRACT NO iS7 C M. .._ __._.. MULTI •FAMILYUNITS— .— __....._.... q vicl.• i i . 3 rr•o• �� 7-CI•<t w1Tr.Lwcai$iluLaolt LAFDLrT aowATA11N IO[RNrrN[LOA.NIM q�Nd�j '1 1fO0aIRARRNOIO0. .I�w, iluomoe� 11�aN•rL •= Y.RAM�Nr CO. r.OAw ARN ROa rr �1N Att I.AAA{[ MN ut.SAAAR —FRN aAaO� RA'A'A_/ A.IN OMN1a anPA.0 INNIMrM1VR11RNNrN.Nf.AD 1 TN AAWI1 aIANRaa1a II0a1DAlar. d•�t OMN[R Ira1w r.RAR NRrAL1Ml Barr N IIANV AvG nwR` .1NA.�VL.MI.V/ rAwAS,uNRt R[L.IYKaAR111�rV I . fNa r.T1a trLR •• •�• JIIIVE/ U t0 HO 12101 160' 2(xi. Dw` Ia.rV i 11,i MAJOR MO'DIF'ICATION ;rt DRAINAGE CONCEPT 14, t . r. aTr4 �TT LEGAL DL.yNIPTInA . �•. MaI NIVIW■ FC ►.11A \D I' AADWDITNLCTIVAIAT1.0t —1 sD. �r IST Moo1rAN1: u s UJL'I\N) \, aAVCT<U UMI. M.A L I1W . b rrI11C1AL AL <'OADSC I.OT-A'UI'DALNITI'MA. IM".L(IF MU \. ,41, GRADING PLAN ,kj.jfj OCKaLf(N IK CMPT\OT VT ?Tb[A. \TiTTU1 r I w.su w. n.• r.r�• n.�a.. { I••.ww. . +, w4• • w{a < • <... w I. ..M~~ COLLLR MGM CO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 /i •- CA4MLAL GLf1TR IFOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOS fLMIR10 SRf s iIODNSULTmm W— OgORLRr10 • rTROO1RRT T DRMLSaar. {ra..r a a +...... „ 11 ••{w•Mn Atrr.. ��-_ Z4 D �r DwwAaIJtTK —AMAL r—"J SCALE: 1 ". 10 1p11N10RwRw SiNIA W . wN4MOAM ANI N11RI1wMl �ErT10N t%•Q Itp4tOWL 1 V9.7fCAL "AD STREW rII+•rwl. •.n.� L) N r.T1 TYPICAL STRXET S&MON M. Ta �'' . .. '' TRACT NO iS7 C M. .._ __._.. MULTI •FAMILYUNITS— .— __....._.... q vicl.• i i . 3 rr•o• �� 7-CI•<t w1Tr.Lwcai$iluLaolt LAFDLrT aowATA11N IO[RNrrN[LOA.NIM q�Nd�j '1 1fO0aIRARRNOIO0. .I�w, iluomoe� 11�aN•rL •= Y.RAM�Nr CO. r.OAw ARN ROa rr �1N Att I.AAA{[ MN ut.SAAAR —FRN aAaO� RA'A'A_/ A.IN OMN1a anPA.0 INNIMrM1VR11RNNrN.Nf.AD 1 TN AAWI1 aIANRaa1a II0a1DAlar. d•�t OMN[R Ira1w r.RAR NRrAL1Ml Barr N IIANV AvG nwR` .1NA.�VL.MI.V/ rAwAS,uNRt R[L.IYKaAR111�rV I . fNa r.T1a trLR •• •�• JIIIVE/ U t0 HO 12101 160' 2(xi. Dw` Ia.rV i 11,i MAJOR MO'DIF'ICATION ;rt DRAINAGE CONCEPT 14, t . r. aTr4 �TT LEGAL DL.yNIPTInA . �•. MaI NIVIW■ FC ►.11A \D I' AADWDITNLCTIVAIAT1.0t —1 sD. �r IST Moo1rAN1: u s UJL'I\N) \, aAVCT<U UMI. M.A L I1W . b rrI11C1AL AL <'OADSC I.OT-A'UI'DALNITI'MA. IM".L(IF MU \. ,41, GRADING PLAN ,kj.jfj OCKaLf(N IK CMPT\OT VT ?Tb[A. \TiTTU1 r I w.su w. n.• r.r�• n.�a.. { I••.ww. . +, w4• • w{a < • <... w I. ..M~~ COLLLR MGM CO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 /i •- CA4MLAL GLf1TR IFOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOS fLMIR10 SRf s iIODNSULTmm W— OgORLRr10 • rTROO1RRT T DRMLSaar. {ra..r a M. Ta �'' . .. '' TRACT NO iS7 C M. .._ __._.. MULTI •FAMILYUNITS— .— __....._.... q vicl.• i i . 3 rr•o• �� 7-CI•<t w1Tr.Lwcai$iluLaolt LAFDLrT aowATA11N IO[RNrrN[LOA.NIM q�Nd�j '1 1fO0aIRARRNOIO0. .I�w, iluomoe� 11�aN•rL •= Y.RAM�Nr CO. r.OAw ARN ROa rr �1N Att I.AAA{[ MN ut.SAAAR —FRN aAaO� RA'A'A_/ A.IN OMN1a anPA.0 INNIMrM1VR11RNNrN.Nf.AD 1 TN AAWI1 aIANRaa1a II0a1DAlar. d•�t OMN[R Ira1w r.RAR NRrAL1Ml Barr N IIANV AvG nwR` .1NA.�VL.MI.V/ rAwAS,uNRt R[L.IYKaAR111�rV I . fNa r.T1a trLR •• •�• JIIIVE/ U t0 HO 12101 160' 2(xi. Dw` Ia.rV i 11,i MAJOR MO'DIF'ICATION ;rt DRAINAGE CONCEPT 14, t . r. aTr4 �TT LEGAL DL.yNIPTInA . �•. MaI NIVIW■ FC ►.11A \D I' AADWDITNLCTIVAIAT1.0t —1 sD. �r IST Moo1rAN1: u s UJL'I\N) \, aAVCT<U UMI. M.A L I1W . b rrI11C1AL AL <'OADSC I.OT-A'UI'DALNITI'MA. IM".L(IF MU \. ,41, GRADING PLAN ,kj.jfj OCKaLf(N IK CMPT\OT VT ?Tb[A. \TiTTU1 r I w.su w. n.• r.r�• n.�a.. { I••.ww. . +, w4• • w{a < • <... w I. ..M~~ COLLLR MGM CO. TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 /i •- CA4MLAL GLf1TR IFOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOS fLMIR10 SRf s iIODNSULTmm W— OgORLRr10 • rTROO1RRT T DRMLSaar. {ra..r a RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -04, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2002 -04, MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307, AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 0.33 ACRES SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND MILLARD AVENUE, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND THE CITY OF MOORPARK (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 512 -0 -122 -040 & -060) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company and the City of Moorpark for an approximately 0.33 acre site located on the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0- 122 -040 & -060); and WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically described as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04: A request for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from M (Medium Density) to VHD (Very High Density); Zone Change No. 2001 -01: A request for a change in the Zoning from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD -9.1U (Residential Planned Development -9.1 dwelling units /acre); Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01: A request for inclusion of 0.33 acres of land to be subdivided into 3 lots within the subdivision and the construction of 3 additional affordable single family units; S: \Community Development \T T M\ 5307 \Resolutions- Conditions \021014 pc reso cond F.doc Cl 1)'t�F, �� n Dr", AMMAt"Umvx7m 7 RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 2 WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing, and reached a decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The Planning Commission does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 are consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to amendment of the land use designation as proposed. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The Planning Commission further finds that General Plan Amendment No. 2002- 04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 are consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map modification, and Residential Planned Development Permit modification. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01. RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 3 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01. SECTION 3. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS: The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: Modification to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. �` 0 Fn i'`'a RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 4 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. SECTION 4. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure (s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04, Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. `1) 010 "12, RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 5 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2002. Kipp Landis, Vice Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. Conditions of Approval for Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 B. Mitigation Monitoring Program C. General Plan Amendment Map D. Zone Change Map r r�<111- , ti ID1 4 RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 6 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 A. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. All conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 shall continue to apply, and unless specifically directed to particular lots, shall apply to the additional 0.33 acres of land, except as amended herein. 2. Conditions of Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Tentative Tract 5307 which apply to all lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue shall apply to Lots 23, 24 and 25 as well, unless the Director of Community Development determines otherwise. 3. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation, which references conditions of approval, shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 4. Conditions of this entitlement shall not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. The approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included as an attachment to the approving resolution, and all mitigation measures are requirements of the Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. 5. All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Tentative Map, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occurs and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community Development Director shall determine the applicable RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 7 condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. 6. This approval permits the addition of 0.33 acres of land to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, for the purpose of creating an additional three (3) lots within the tract. These additional lots will be used for the construction of affordable housing units. Income levels for prospective buyers of these units shall be determined by the City of Moorpark. 7. Lots 23, 24, and 25 shall be developed with Plan 3, approved as part of Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01. The exterior building treatment for each unit shall be sufficiently different, as determined by the Community Development Director, so as to be distinct from one another. 8. The perimeter wall of Tract 5307 shall be extended to encompass the additional acreage. The extended wall shall be constructed of the same materials with the same treatments as the rest of the tract. The wall height shall be the same as the rest of the tract, except as noted herein. 9. Wall pockets along Los Angeles Avenue shall be deleted. An appropriate planting palette, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, shall be utilized to soften the appearance of the sound wall. Plant material used shall have low water demands and low maintenance needs. 10. Access to lots 23, 24, and 25 shall be through a 20 -foot wide common driveway. Entrance to the driveway from "A" street shall be via a raised curb with driveway apron. This driveway shall extend only far enough to provide access to lot 25, but shall not connect, or appear to connect, to Millard Street. Precise design shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 11. A "hammerhead" turn- around area shall be located at the easterly end of "A" street. This shall meet the standards of the Fire Department, and shall be striped and signed, to the satisfaction of the Fire Department and the City Engineer, as a "No Parking" area. 12. The existing storm drain easement at the west side of Lot 23 shall be covered and graded to the level of the pad on Cl 1)13'i3 °1�; RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 8 Lot 23. This area shall be restricted to disallow construction or permanent improvements within it to ensure accessibility to the culvert for maintenance purposes. 13. The sidewalk along Los Angeles Avenue shall meander, and may be reduced to a minimum width of 5 feet, with the approval of the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer, providing areas suitable for the planting of trees and shrubs along the right of way. The location of the sidewalk shall be approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 14. Berms and /or low retaining walls shall be utilized intermittently within the landscape planter areas along Los Angeles Avenue to add visual interest and soften the appearance of the sound walls, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 15. The sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue shall be constructed of decorative block, with variation in color, texture and mass to create visual interest and soften the appearance. "Pilaster" elements incorporating different colors and textures shall be incorporated into the wall at least every 25 feet to break up the wall mass. Wall plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a landscape plan shall be prepared on the approved grading plan and submitted to the City for review, and approved by the Community Development Director. 17. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy for the first unit, the approved landscape plan shall be implemented, and be found to be in substantial compliance with the plan approved by the Community Development Director. B. MITIGATION MEASURE CONDITIONS: 1. Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of building plans, the Applicant shall provide an acoustical study report to the Community Development Director that outlines the proposed program for compliance with the Noise Element Standards of 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) for exterior locations within the development and 45 CNEL for interior locations within the dwelling. 2. Construct a sound wall along the southern property line of lots 1 through 11, and lots 23 through 25, along Los RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 9 Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for lots 3 though 9, 11.5 feet above the centerline for lots 10 and 11, and 12.5 above the centerline for lots 23 through 25. Construct a 5 to 6 foot wide planter between the wall and Los Angeles Avenue. This planter shall be planted in accordance with Condition No. 15, above. 3. The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of lot 1, and at least 20 feet to the north on the east side of lot 25. These extensions shall then transition gradually down in height to a standard 6 feet. 4. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8- inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8- inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 5. All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 6. All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 7. All exterior vents on the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be directed away from Los Angeles Avenue in order to reduce noise transmissions into the house through vents and ducts. 8. The applicant shall prepare a hydrology study shall be prepared, if deemed necessary by the City Engineer, to determine the appropriate size of the culvert. The culvert shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002- Page 10 PWRTRTT R MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall provide verification to the Community Development Director, that the proposed culvert to be placed in the storm drain easement along the west side of Lot 22 is properly sized to handle the expected flow. 2. Prior to the release of grading or improvement bonds the City Engineer shall verify that the construction of this culvert is satisfactory. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building Official shall provide verification to the Community Development Director that the building permit plans comply with all noise mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. 4. Prior to occupancy of each unit, the Building Official shall ensure, by physical inspection, the compliance with these plans. S: \Community Development \T T M \5307 \Resolutions- Conditions \021014 pc reso F.docQr,,r F L 0 N y A v E Cfj Exhibit C General Plan Amendment Map LOS ANGELES A VEN U E M I L L A R D S T N E E T Note: drawing not to scale F L 0 R y A v E c L' 0 Exhibit D Zone Change Map LOS ANGELES AV .NUE N m I L L A R [' T R E E T ,Vote: drawing not to .scale MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 517 -6200 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: The City of Moorpark, after having conducted an Initial Study, has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the following project: Major Modification No.1 - T 5307, Minor Modification No. 1— RPD 99 -1, General Plan Amendment 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04 Amend General Plan Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential); Amend zoning designation from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD -9.1 U (Residential Planned Development — 9.1 units per acre); Modify Tract 5307 and RPD 99 -01 to include an additional 0.33 acres for 3 additional affordable units. The project is located at: North east corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Avenue, Moorpark, Ventura County The project site is not contained on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including, but not limited to lists of hazardous waste facilities, land designated as hazardous waste property, and hazardous waste disposal sites. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study are forwarded to you for possible comments relating to your area of interest. All documents referenced therein are available for review during normal business hours in the Community Development office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021. Information on public hearings or meetings for the proposed project can be obtained from the Community Development Department at (805) 517 -6200. Written comments should be directed to: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517 -62 36 swolfe @ci.moorpark.ca.us Written comments will be accepted in the Community Development Department office for a period of twenty (20) days after publication of this notice. Public Notice Published: September 30, 2002 Mitigated Negative Declaration Comment Period: September 30, 2002 to October 21, 2002 y f yx' Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Distribution: PC ATTACHMENT 3 29 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF MOORPARK 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6200 The following Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Moorpark. Public Review Period: September 30 to October 21, 2002 Project Title /Case No.: Major Modification No.1 - T 5307, Minor Modification No. 1 — RPD 99 -1, General Plan Amendment 2002 -04, Zone Change 2002 -04 Project Location: North east corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Avenue, Moorpark, Ventura County. (Location Map Attached) Project Description: Amend General Plan Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential); Amend zoning designation from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD -9.1 U (Residential Planned Development — 9.1 units per acre); Modify Tract 5307 and RPD 99 -01 to include an additional 0.33 acres for 3 additional affordable units. Project Type: Project Applicant X Private Project X Public Project Colmer Development Company, 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 110, Calabasas, CA 91302 / City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021 Finding: After preparing an Initial Study for the above - referenced project, it is found that there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City of Moorpark, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. However, this effect can be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the imposition of mitigation measures which have been incorporated into the project. (Initial Study Attached) Responsible Agencies: None Trustee Agencies: None Attachments: Location Map Initial Study Contact Person: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California, 93021 (805) 517 -62 36 C01 3 SACommunity Development\T T M \5307 \MND.doc Project Location: Northwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Avenue General Plan Designation: M (Medium Density Residential) Zoning: R -1 (Single Family Residential) Project Description: Amend General Plan Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential); Amend zoning designation from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD -9.1 U (Residential Planned Development — 9.1 units per acre); Modify Tract 5307 and RPD 99 -01 to include an additional 0.33 acres for 3 additional affordable units. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Existing Residential Neighborhood South: Los Angeles Avenue and Residential uses East: Existing Residential Neighborhood West: School Facilities — Tentative Tract 5307 Responsible and Trustee Agencies: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Si nificant Impact" or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated, "as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use /Planning Mineral Resources X Noise Population /Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities /Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance None DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. Mitigation measures described on the attached Exhibit 1 have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared by: Reviewed by: Date: Date: �" Z INITIAL STUDY EXHIBIT 1: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of lots 1 through 11, and lots 23 thorugh 25, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for lots 3 though 9, 11.5 feet above the centerline for lots 10 and 11, and 12.5 above the centerline for lots 22 through 25. In order to screen the wall, a 5 to 6 foot wide planter shall be provided between the wall and Los Angeles Avenue. This planter will be planted with trees, shrubs, and vines to screen the wall. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 2. The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of lot 1, and at least 20 feet on the east side of lot 11. These extensions will then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 foot wall height. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 3. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 inch gypsum board, 3.5 inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 4. All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies, or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development r- r, 2 All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be gasketed (jamb, head, and sill) with interlocking or tube type compression weather stripping, or an effective equivalent. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 6. All exterior vents on the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be directed away from Los Angeles Avenue in order to reduce noise transmissions into the house through vents and ducts. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 7. A hydrology study shall be prepared, if determined necessary by the City Engineer, to determine the appropriate size of the culvert. The culvert shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Monitoring Action: City Engineer to review project plans for compliance Timing: Prior to issuance of grading permits Responsibility. City Engineer AGREEMENT TO PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6), this agreement must be signed prior to release of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for public review. I, THE UNDERSIGNED PROJECT APPLICANT, HEREBY AGREE TO MODIFY THE PROJECT DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE ABOVE - LISTED MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE PROJECT. Signature of Project Applicant Date ti �. C 4;f� •� ii �.� 3 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The project proposes to construct a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet. In order to screen the wall, the project will provide a 5 to 6 foot wide landscape planter in front of the wall adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: This planter will be planted with trees, shrubs, and vines to screen the wall. B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: None Required. 0 r� C� G Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact A. AESTHETICS — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X 2) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but X not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 3) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The project proposes to construct a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet. In order to screen the wall, the project will provide a 5 to 6 foot wide landscape planter in front of the wall adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: This planter will be planted with trees, shrubs, and vines to screen the wall. B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: None Required. 0 r� C� G Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact C. AIR QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? 2) Violate any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? 5) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Response: This project does not affect Air Quality Resources. Sources: 7 Mitigation: None required. D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? :`- t 3 5 5) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 6) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact x conservation plan e Response: This project proposes changes on previously developed urban land, and therefore does not impact biological resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: None required. E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: x 1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x a historic resource as defined in §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological x resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred x outside of formal cemeteries? Response: This project proposes changes on previously developed land, and therefore is not expected to impact cultural resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: None required. F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: 1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death Involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X x 5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X Response: This project is not within Alquist Priolo Special Studies areas, and does not have any soils or geological impacts. The site is within a liquefaction zone, and will need to comply with the requirements of the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act. Sources: 3, Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle, Seismic Hazard Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle. Mitigation: None Required. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 4 e-1Ir r, 7 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X 2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X Response: This project is not within Alquist Priolo Special Studies areas, and does not have any soils or geological impacts. The site is within a liquefaction zone, and will need to comply with the requirements of the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act. Sources: 3, Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle, Seismic Hazard Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle. Mitigation: None Required. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 4 e-1Ir r, 7 7) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 8) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact X resiaences are mtermixea witn wnaianas r Response: There are no known hazards on the project site. Sources: 3 Mitigation: None Required. X H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? 2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 4) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? 5) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 6) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X 7) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? 9) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving i) flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact ii) inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Response: This project proposes the "boxing" of a currently open storm drain channel into a 4 foot culvert. This improvement will be engineered to accommodate anticipated flows, and therefore will not reflect a significant impact. Sources: Project plans. Mitigation: A hydrology study shall be prepared, if determined necessary by the City Engineer, to determine the appropriate size of the culvert. The culvert shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. I. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: 1) Physically divide an established community? X 2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Response: While this project deviates from the current General Plan Land Use element map designation with regard to density on the subject site, the project would help meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element and is consistent with all other General Plan Goals and Policies. Further, this project includes a General Plan Amendment which will ensure that the project is consistent with the Land Use Element map as well. Therefore, this impact is not significant. Sources: 3,4 Mitigation: None Required J. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 2) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Response: This project will not affect mineral resources. Sources: n/a Mitigation: None Required. n Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact K. NOISE — Would the project result in: 1) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in x excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 2) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive x groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels x in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 4) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient x noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, x where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would x the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Response: 1) Ambient noise levels within the project area along Los Angeles Avenue are expected to exceed 65 CNEL . 4)Temporary increases in ambient noise levels can be expected during construction periods. However, City regulations pertaining to hours of construction will ensure that this impact is less than significant. Sources: 1,3,4 Mitigation: 1) Installation of sound walls along Los Angeles Avenue. See mitigation monitoring program for further details. 4) None L. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: 1) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either x directly ( for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ( for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 2) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ��v Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Response: This project will have a beneficial impact of helping to achieve housing goals in support of the Housing Element of the General Plan. Sources: 3 Mitigation: None required. M. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? x Police protection? x Schools? x Parks? x Other public facilities? x Response: While some incremental impact on public services is to be expected, the impacts are not significant. Sources: Site Plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. N. RECREATION 1) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 2) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Im Response: This project will have no impact on recreational resources. Sources: Project plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. O. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC — Would the project: 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 2) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 4) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Response: This project will have no impacts on transportation facilities or traffic patterns. Sources: Site Plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. LU X X X X X X X P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: 1) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 2) Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact 3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 5) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? 6) Be served by the landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 7) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Less Than With Significant No Mitigation Impact Impact X Response: This project proposes the "boxing" of an open storm drain channel into a 4 foot culvert. This improvement will be engineered to accommodate anticipated flows, and therefore does not reflect a significant impact. Sources: Project Plans Mitigation: None required Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehistory? 2) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effect of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and effects of probable future projects)? 3) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 13 X X X X X X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact impact Response: Mitigation measures will be impose that will enable the project to reduce any potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Sources: 1,3,4 Earlier Environmental Documents Used in the Preparation of this Initial Study Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tract 5307 and associated projects dated March 4, 2002. Additional Project References Used to Prepare This Initial Study 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and are available for review in the Community Development Office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Items used are referred to by number in the Response Section of the Initial Study Checklist. Traffic Noise Study Report for the Colmer Residential Department dated March 14, 2001. Comments received from (departments) in response to the Community Development Department's request for comments. The City of Moorpark's General Plan, as amended. The Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended. The City of Moorpark Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 92 -872 Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Section 15000 et. seq. Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 14, 2000. 14 C �J J10Gt RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -04, A CHANGE IN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO VH (VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLARD AVENUE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND THE CITY OF MOORPARK. WHEREAS, on October 2, 2002, Resolution No. 2002 -2015 was adopted by the City Council, initiating General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04, to amend the Land Use Designation from M (Medium Density Residential) to VH (Very High Density Residential) , on property located at the northwest corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -431 recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 2002 -03; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 6, 2002, the City Council considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -04, opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, and testimony received, reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. B. The City Council has considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a decision concerning the project and the Negative Declaration. CC ATTACHMENT 2 `�' ,G'' 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - Page 2 C. The Mitigation Measures of this project have been incorporated into the project conditions of the accompanying Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development. D. The City Council's approval of the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents an independent action based upon the City Council's independent judgment. SECTION 2. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP: The General Plan Land Use Map is amended as proposed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A: General Plan Exhibit Map fir.. 4.a co Vi Exhibit A General Plan Amendment Map M LOS ANGELES AVENUE I'j M L L A R D s T E E T Note: drawing not to scale ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2002 -04 FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RPD 9.1 DWELLING UNITS /ACRE ON 0.33 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLARD AVENUE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE WHEREAS, on October 2, 2002, Resolution No. 2002 -2015 was adopted by the City Council, initiating Zone Change No. 2002 -04, to amend the Zoning Designation from R -1 (Single Family Residential) to RPD -9.1U (Residential Planned Development - 9.1 Units per Acre) , on property located at the northwest corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue; and WHEREAS, after holding a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -231 recommending to the City Council approval of amendments to the Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of November 6, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing, took public testimony, closed the public hearing and reached its decision; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council found the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the project to be complete and prepared in compliance with CEQA and City policy; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a decision concerning the project and the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council's approval of the project and the Negative Declaration represents an independent action based upon the City Council's independent judgment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Zoning Map described and referenced in Chapter 17.12 of Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the CC ATTACHMENT 3 ORDINANCE NO. 287 Page 2 City of Moorpark is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A: Zone Change Exhibit Map C; Q, )107It F L 0 R y A V E tom: Exhibit A Zone Change Map N �, LOS ANGELES AVENUE � , m I L L A R D s T R E E T Nate: drawing not to scale RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 5207 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLARD AVENUE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND THE CITY OF MOORPARK WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 14, 2002, the City of Moorpark Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -431, recommending to the City Council approval of Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 2001 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company and the City of Moorpark to allow the addition of 0.33 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Millard Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue to be subdivided into three (3) lots and to be developed with three (3) single family detached residential units; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on November 6, 2002, the City Council considered Major Modification No. 1 to Tentative Tract Map 5307 and Minor Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 2001 -01; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of November 6, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, and closed the public hearing. WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and public testimony has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY: The City Council does hereby find that the aforementioned Major Modification to the Tentative Tract Map, and Minor Modification to the Residential Planned Development are consistent with the City's General Plan Zoning Map, subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2002 -04 and Zone Change 2002 -04. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council finds and declares as follows: S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \T T M \5307 \Resolutions- Conditions \021106 cc reso ttmrpd.doc CC ATTACHMENT 4 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 A. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. B. The City Council has considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a decision concerning the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Mitigation Measures of this project have been incorporated into the project conditions. D. The City Council's approval of the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents an independent action based upon the City Council's independent judgment. SECTION 3. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS: The City Council hereby adopts the following findings: Modification to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached special and standard conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: A. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. B. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. E. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. H. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. I. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 3 SECTION 4. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: The City Council hereby adopts the following findings: The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that: A. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. B. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. C. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. D. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. E. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 5. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: A. The City Council hereby approves Major Modification 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No 1 to Residential Planned Development 2001 -01 subject to the following special conditions of approval:All conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 shall continue to apply, and unless specifically directed to particular lots, shall apply to the additional 0.33 acres of land, except as amended herein. 1. Conditions of Residential Planned Development No. 2001- 01 and Tentative Tract 5307 which apply to all lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue shall apply to Lots 23, 24 and 25 as well, unless the Director of Community Development determines otherwise. 2. This approval permits the addition of 0.33 acres of land to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, for the purpose of creating an additional three (3) lots within the tract. These additional lots will be used for the construction of affordable housing units. Income levels for prospective buyers of these units shall be determined by the City of Moorpark. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 4 3. Lots 23, 24, and 25 shall be developed with Plan 3, approved as part of Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01. The exterior building treatment for each unit shall be sufficiently different, as determined by the Community Development Director, so as to be distinct from one another. 4. The perimeter wall of Tract 5307 shall be extended to encompass the additional acreage. The extended wall shall be constructed of the same materials with the same treatments as the rest of the tract. The wall height shall be the same as the rest of the tract, except as noted herein. 5. The sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue shall be constructed of decorative block, with variation in color, texture and mass to create visual interest and soften the appearance. "Pilaster" elements incorporating different colors and textures shall be incorporated into the wall at least every 25 feet to break up the wall mass. Wall plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Wall pockets along Los Angeles Avenue shall be deleted. An appropriate planting palette, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, shall be utilized to soften the appearance of the sound wall. Plant material used shall have low water demands and low maintenance needs. 6. Access to lots 23, 24, and 25 shall be through a 20- foot wide common driveway. Entrance to the driveway from "A" street shall be via a raised curb with driveway apron. This driveway shall extend only far enough to provide access to lot 25, but shall not connect, or appear to connect, to Millard Street. Precise design shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit a reciprocal access and maintenance agreement, subject to the approval as to form by the City Attorney. The agreement shall be recorded on lots 23, 24, and 25. 7. A "hammerhead" turn - around area shall be located at the easterly end of "A" street. This shall meet the standards of the Fire Department, and shall be striped and signed, to the satisfaction of the Fire Department and the City Engineer, as a "No Parking" area. 8. The existing storm drain easement at the west side of Lot 23 shall be covered and graded to the level of the pad on Lot 23. This area shall be restricted to disallow construction or permanent improvements within Resolution No. 2002 - Page 5 it to ensure accessibility to the culvert for maintenance purposes. 9. The sidewalk along Los Angeles Avenue shall may be reduced to a minimum width of 5 feet, with the approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer, providing areas suitable for the planting of trees and shrubs along the right of way. The location of the sidewalk shall be approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. MITIGATION MEASURE CONDITIONS: 10. Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of building plans, the Applicant shall provide an acoustical study report to the Community Development Director that outlines the proposed program for compliance with the Noise Element Standards of 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) for exterior locations within the development and 45 CNEL for interior locations within the dwelling. 11. The applicant shall construct a sound wall along the southern property line of lots 1 through 11, and lots 23 through 25, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for lots 3 though 9, 11.5 feet above the centerline for lots 10 and 11, and 12.5 above the centerline for lots 23 through 25. The applicant shall construct a 5 to 6 foot wide planter between the wall and Los Angeles Avenue. This planter shall be planted in accordance with Condition No. 4, above. 12. The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of lot 1, and at least 20 feet to the north on the east side of lot 25. These extensions shall then transition gradually down in height to a standard 6 feet. 13. To reduce the interior noise glass thickness of 3/16 -inch wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum bo filled cavity, 7/8 -inch lath single family residential installed. levels, a minimum window and a standard exterior ard, 3.5 -inch fiberglass and stucco, typical for developments shall be 14. All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue, as well as the Flory side of lot 1 and the Millard side of lot 25, shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 00 e 6 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 6 15. All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 16. All exterior vents on the homes on Lots 1 through 11, and lots 22 through 25, shall be directed away from Los Angeles Avenue in order to reduce noise transmissions into the house through vents and ducts. 17. The applicant shall prepare an addendum to the previously prepared hydrology study, if deemed necessary by the City Engineer, to determine the appropriate size of the culvert. The culvert shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The City Council approves Major Modification 1 to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Minor Modification No 1 to Residential Planned Development 2001 -01 subject to the standard conditions of approval in Exhibit A (Standard Conditions of Approval) , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: uenoran ,�. '1'rairensteat, city Clerk Exhibit A: Standard Conditions of Approval Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring Program Resolution No. 2002 - Page 7 EXHIBIT A STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 A. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation, which references conditions of approval, shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 2. Conditions of this entitlement shall not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. The approved Mitigation' Monitoring and Reporting Program is included as an attachment to the approving resolution, and all mitigation measures are requirements of the Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. 3. All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Tentative Map, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occurs and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community Development Director shall determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. 4. Berms and /or low retaining walls shall be utilized intermittently within the landscape planter areas along Los Angeles Avenue to add visual interest and soften the appearance of the sound walls, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a landscape plan shall be prepared on the approved grading plan and submitted to the City for review, and approved by the Community Development Director. 6. Prior to the issuance of final occupancy for the first unit, the approved landscape plan shall be implemented, and be found to be in substantial compliance with the plan approved by the Community Development Director. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 8 RWRTRTT R MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall provide verification to the Community Development Director, that the proposed culvert to be placed in the storm drain easement along the west side of Lot 22 is properly sized to handle the expected flow. 2. Prior to the release of grading or improvement bonds the City Engineer shall verify that the construction of this culvert is satisfactory. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building Official shall provide verification to the Community Development Director that the building permit plans comply with all noise mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. 4. Prior to occupancy of each unit, the Building Official shall ensure, by physical inspection, the compliance with these plans. C 0010 I'T'EM �• �. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council v7,7?F ,1�?3. l kT,TFORI qA of i ItC C AC 1 , J It 51mS+ recoww�[ „ dais, 1` 4.0 11-;40-900G, a4%A (retzo- 10 From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst Date: October 29, 2002 (CC Meeting of November 6, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER RE- ALLOCATING PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF 6479 -B PENN STREET (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS) BACKGROUND At its October 2, 2002, Regular Meeting, the Moorpark City Council approved Resolution No. 2002 -2011, authorizing the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street. The unit has been sold, and escrow is expected to close November 8, 2002. Public notice of this matter has been published, as required by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations. DISCUSSION Funds from the proceeds of this sale may be re- allocated to any eligible Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project. If the Council wishes to utilize the proceeds for Affordable Housing, the funds may be designated for that purpose, with a specific project to be identified at a later date. If CDBG funds are used for property acquisition or for a loan to enable a developer to purchase land, and affordable dwelling units are constructed on the property, the CDBG funds could be rolled over into deferred payment mortgages ( "Silent Second Mortgages "). These Silent Second Mortgages, in favor of the City, would thereby provide partial funding for the down payments needed for the affordable units. The funds would eventually be returned to the City, per resale restrictions developed by the City. 000081 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 2 It is possible that prevailing wages might be required for a project with this type of assistance. However, staff believes that recently enacted legislation (SB 972) may provide an exemption for this type of assistance, providing that all assistance is structured as a loan and not a grant. If Council desires to provide CDBG funds as assistance for Affordable Housing, this form of assistance would help the largest number of low income buyers. Staff recommends that the assistance per buyer be limited to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per household. Additional funds from other sources (developer contribution or public funds such as Housing Setaside) could be utilized to supplement CDBG. All public funding needs to be structured as a loan to qualify for the exemption referenced above. It is unclear at this time whether the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street will add approximately two hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($217,000) or two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the City's CDBG allocation of funds. The difference of thirty -three thousand dollars ($33,000) represents the gain on the sale of the property, over the purchase price and costs of the purchase transaction, plus the closing costs for the sale transaction. The City is awaiting a determination by HUD as to the disposition of the $33,000 in question (Attachment "A "). As shown on Attachment "B", the City's unexpended funds currently total approximately $447,140. HUD regulations limit the unexpended funds in the City's line of credit to one and one half (1 %) times the annual allocation, which is approximately two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) . This means that the City should carry no more than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) in its unexpended line of credit. When escrow closes on the subject property, the City's CDBG allocation will be increased by either $217,000 or $250,000, for a total line of credit of either six hundred sixty -four thousand one hundred forty dollars ($664,140) or six hundred ninety -seven thousand one hundred forty dollars ($697,140). Council action on the re- allocation of $250,000 is requested at this time. This will avoid the need to bring this item before the Council again, in the event that a funding decision is made Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 3 for $217,000 and the City receives a favorable decision from HUD for the remaining $33,000 in question. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue this item to the City Council meeting of November 20, 2002; and 2. Refer the matter to the Budget and Finance Committee for consideration prior to the Council meeting of November 20, 2002. Attachment "A ": 6479 -B Penn Street Transaction Costs Attachment "B ": Unexpended Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 4 Attachment "A" 6479 -B Penn Street Transaction Costs Item Purchase Transaction Sale Transaction Sales Price $217,000 $250,000 Closing Costs $1,745 (Estimated) $16,402 Net Gain (Estimated) $14,853 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 5 Attachment "B" Unexpended Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds October 29, 2002 Project /Program Funds Available Affordable Housing $49,710 Street Lights (Downtown Residential) $146,876 Public Park $143,400 Boys & Girls Club Re- Roofing Project $20,000 Code Enforcement $20,999 RAIN $5,000 Catholic Charities $8,535 Senior Nutrition $10,000 Senior Center Operations $12,000 Senior Survivalmobile $1,000 Administration $29,620 Total $447,140 ITEM q. A. cf __ I I- �,- -9ICC rl AC-1 . - ." : &W fQ "I 5iat Y �C W MOORPARK CITY COUNC I T�O,,,4,h,_;,. 1-4 d 6d ng,4 .Qb AGENDA REPORT r6is d, ana TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: October 25, 2002 (Council Meeting 11 -6 -02) SUBJECT: Consider Report Pertaining to the Efforts Required to Seek a Restriction of Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route 118 Between Route 23 and Route 34 nTgMTgSTnN A. Background • In 1989 the City investigated development of a request to Caltrans for the establishment of a prohibition of truck traffic through the City. No action was authorized to pursue a formal application. • In 1994, just prior to the completion of the Route 23 / Route 118 Freeway Connector Project, the City again made a request to Caltrans to restrict trucks through the City. It was feared that the opening of the connector project would cause truck traffic to increase. Caltrans again provided the City with the guidelines for the submittal of a formal application. Due to the rather extensive and costly nature of that process no action was taken to pursue that application. • In 1999 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -1604 requesting that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) direct Caltrans to initiate efforts necessary to establish a truck prohibition through the City. Again we were directed to develop and submit a formal application. • In response to that direction, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for consultant services to investigate the feasibility of establishing the desired truck restrictions. • An RFP was prepared and sent to a number of consultants. Initially the City received no response. Later Parsons Transportation Group [ "Parsons "] submitted a proposal and was ultimately selected to perform this study. Truck—ban-0211 Truck Prohibition October 25, 2002 Page 2 B. Scope of Work Parsons was retained to perform a preliminary investigation of the requirements and processes related to the establishment of truck restrictions on a State Highway, and to provide recommendations regarding the feasibility and cost of developing, processing and administering an application for the establishment of truck restrictions on Highway 118 between the freeway and Somis Road (Route 34) [see Exhibit 1]. The Tasks outlined in the proposal are summarized as follows: 1. Determine whether or not the National Highway System [NHS] designation would have to be removed in order to establish a truck restriction. 2. If yes, describe the steps and costs required to have the subject segment of Route 118 deleted from the NHS. 3. Describe and define the requirements and costs related to the development, submittal, processing and administration of a complete application package to Caltrans for the establishment of the subject truck restrictions. Said work would also include preliminary environmental assessment to determine the scope and cost of the environmental document required by such an application. 4. Prepare a complete report describing the need and purpose for the project, the research to date and recommendations regarding whether or not to proceed with the development of the application package. C. Task 1 Parsons has completed Task 1. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a letter summarizing the findings and conclusions reached. It is the view of Parsons that truck restrictions can co -exist with the NHS designation. However, Parsons points out that any truck restrictions established on an NHS route must be done for safety reasons only. D. Task 2 The original Task 2 was to investigate the process and requirements for removing the NHS designation from Route 118. Parsons has concluded that it is not necessary to remove the NHS designation in order to establish "justifiable" truck restrictions. It is recommended below, therefore, that the original Task 2 be deleted from the Scope of Work. Truck—ban-0211 C WON Truck Prohibition October 25, 2002 Page 3 E. Safety Justification The Parsons letter also points out the following: • All of the truck restrictions established on State Highways were established for "safety" reasons; • Federal law prohibits any state from restricting truck traffic, except for reasons of safety. If the City is to be successful in establishing truck restrictions on Route 118, it will have to be done for safety reasons. F. Perceived vs. Actual Safetv Problems There is a perception that truck traffic on Los Angeles Avenue poses a "safety" problem. That perception may or may not be correct. Highway safety is a relative term. The "safeness "( or "unsafeness ") of a highway is quantifiable. The factors used to determine the relative safeness of a Highway usually relate to geometric design (curves, hills, line -of -sight issues, etc.) , accident history or both. It is possible to conduct an analysis of any highway and to objectively determine the \'relative safeness" of that highway. It is recommended below that such a study be performed for this segment of highway. G. Revised Task 2 As mentioned in the Parsons letter, the City may wish to consider approval of efforts necessary to conduct a Safety Analysis of the subject Route segment to determine whether or not there is a "safety justification" for seeking a truck restriction. Parsons has provided a description of that work, which is attached as Exhibit 3. The cost for this Task would be $6,897. It is recommended below that this work be authorized. H. Tasks 3 & 4 Tasks 3 & 4 call for Parsons to develop the full requirements and costs for preparing, processing and administering a formal application package to Caltrans, for the establishment of the desired truck restrictions. It is recommended below that this work be deferred until after the Safety Analysis is performed. Truck—ban-0211 C Q 01 10 s.r, Truck Prohibition October 25, 2002 Page 4 I. Total Study Cost Summary Description Fee Amount ($) Task 1 2,853 Prior Task 2 3,513 sub -total 6,366 Delete Prior Task 2 (3,513) Add Revised Task 2 6,897 It is recommended that staff be directed to instruct Parsons to: 1. Delete the prior Task 2 (removal of the NHS designation) from the Scope of Work; 2. Add a Revised Task 2 to the Scope of Work to conduct a Safety Analysis of the subject Highway Segment for the fee amount indicated in this report; and 3. Defer work on Tasks 3 and 4 until after the Safety Analysis has been reviewed by the City Council. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Truck_ban_0211 Map Parson Report re: Task 1 C Q 0 I) sub -total 9,750 Task 3 8,144 Task 4 3,939 sub -total 21,833 Reimburseables 500 Total 22,333 Notes: Task 1: Analyze impact of NHS designation Task 2: Define steps necessary to delete NHS designation Rev. Task 2: Safety Analysis Task 3: Define application process and requirements Task 4: Final Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that staff be directed to instruct Parsons to: 1. Delete the prior Task 2 (removal of the NHS designation) from the Scope of Work; 2. Add a Revised Task 2 to the Scope of Work to conduct a Safety Analysis of the subject Highway Segment for the fee amount indicated in this report; and 3. Defer work on Tasks 3 and 4 until after the Safety Analysis has been reviewed by the City Council. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Truck_ban_0211 Map Parson Report re: Task 1 C Q 0 I) i C711, w•� OCG�r CJ RT.IIg � Q�QL7G�QQC}QQC•} C■7 ■ �OQQI�Q�j ALTERNATIVE ROUTE r October 21, 2002 Mr. Ken Gilbert Director of Public Works City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Subject: Purchase Order No. 20020047, Determine whether or not the National Highway System (NHS) designation can co -exist with a truck restriction or prohibition. Dear Mr. Gilbert: Parsons has completed its investigation as to whether or not the National Highway System (NHS) designation can remain unchanged on a State route while prohibiting through truck traffic. The following summarizes our investigations and findings. Summary of Findings A local jurisdiction does not have the authority to prohibit through truck traffic on a State Highway. Under the Vehicle Code, Section 35702, it states " No ordinance proposed under section 35701(Truck Prohibition) is effective with respect to any highway which is not under the exclusive jurisdiction of the local authority enacting the ordinance, or, in the case of any state highway, until the ordinance has been submitted by the governing body of the local authority to, and approved in writing by the Department of Transportation." Under Vehicle Code, Section 35701, it further states Department of Transportation approval to prohibit truck traffic on a State highway that is on the National Highway System will require a two - thirds vote by the California Transportation Commission. The Federal Aviation Administration Authorizations (FAAA) Act, Section 601(c), which is codified in 49 U.S. Code Section 14501(c), prohibits the State from restricting truck traffic on a State highway with the exception that it may do so for safety reasons. Local authorities are not granted this power. Their petition to restrict truck traffic for safety reasons must come through the State. Additionally, Federal law has procedures governing proposed restrictions on truck traffic on state roads that are part of the National Highway System. Under 23 CFR 658, States generally must allow trucks that meet federal weight and size standards to use the network. If the State wishes to close a segment of the network to trucks, it must present FHWA with an analysis of. (1) the safety problems supporting the restriction, (2) its effect on the interstate commerce, and (3) alternative routes to accommodate the traffic. C D &D L4 The history of two relatively recent successful applications is summarized as follows: 1987 Route 152, Hecker Pass, 45' Length Limit: Hecker Pass is a 9.6 -mile stretch of Route 152 between Watsonville and Gilroy. In 1968, signs were installed recommending that trucks use Route 129 instead of Route 152. In 1978, the County of Public Works Department, after receiving approval from the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors, requested that Caltrans District 4 conduct a study to restrict trucks. The truck study was completed in 1979; the study recommended against a restriction at that time because construction on Route 129 was causing an abnormally high traffic volume on Route 152. The Santa Cruz County Transportation Commission began a new effort in 1985 with the public hearing, and developed model ordinances. In 1986, Santa Clara County held a public hearing, and each county adopted a resolution or ordinance to ban truck - trailer combinations over 45 feet in length along Hecker Pass. The cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and Watsonville also adopted resolutions supporting this restriction. A 1986 report published supporting data, including the limited roadway width and winding alignment, truck- involved accidents, and the alternative route available (Route 129). 1997 Route 175, Hopland Grade, 39' Length Limit: Hopland Grade is a 12 -mile segment of Route 175 between Routes 101 and 29. Correspondence requesting the removal of large vehicles from Hopland grade dates back to 1979. In 1989, Caltrans analyzed the geometries on that route segment and designated it as "California Legal - Advisory " suitable for trucks with kingpin -to- rear -axle (KRPA) length less than 30 feet; however, due to federal legislation, California Legal trucks with 40 foot KRPAs could still legally use the route. The restriction process officially began in 1993 when the California Highway Patrol (CHP) requested the prohibition of large vehicles from that segment of Route 175. Later that year, Caltrans District 1 completed a Route Study. In 1996, Caltrans District I completed an environmental study called "Initial Study for Truck Restrictions of Vehicles with 4+ Axles. " In 1996, Lake County held a public hearing, and in 1997, both the Board of Supervisors in Lake County and in Mendocino County approved resolutions supporting this restriction. The Caltrans Director approved the request, and in 1998, a 39 foot vehicle length limit was imposed. Like all other restrictions through out the State, these two recent restrictions were granted because the truck traffic could not safely negotiate the existing roadway geometry and there was overwhelming evidence that these accidents were truck related accidents. Additionally, The Department of Transportation does impose weight restrictions on bridges that it finds to be structurally deficient or functionally obsolete for heavier trucks. These restrictions can serve as de facto prohibitions on truck traffic on certain segments of State roads. It is assumed at this time, however, that there are no structures on State Route 118 that are classified as structurally deficient of functionally obsolete. The following is a current list of special restrictions on State Routes: BEGIN END RTE ' CO ; PM CO ' PM DESCRIPTION a s Posas o through trucks with 4 or 1 LA [40.77,1'Canyon VE N 10.23 [Rd. :more axles B lvd. i - -- - - 1 SB 20.56 N. Jet 246 via H St. in SB ;22.07 F ntral e. in o trucks over 3 tons. - - - -- Lompoc -, -- mpoc- -- - - -- - - -- - -- -- - -- o vehicles transporting 20 LAK ;8.34 Jct 29 iLAK 31.62i'Jct 53 !'hazardous materials / waste - I due to adjacent waters. ?Transport of explosives, Be in j g 'End flammables, liquified 24 !ALA 15.89 Caldecott CC 10.35 Caldecott etroleum gas or poisonous g as in a tank truck, trailer or Tunnel Tunnel semitrailer allowed only 3 am- 15 am. -- - - -- -- - - _ t� Nash Rd. at Santa Ana 25 SBT 50.74 San Benito St. in 3SBT 51.45 I Rd. in ! o trucks over 3 tons. -- -__ - - Hollister I , _- Hollister SBD � 0.71 Benson Ave. in � � � SBD 3.65 Campus �rL-- 1 Ave. in -- o commercial trucks over 5 tons. -- -- __ Upland —J� - - - - - -- -- - -- - - f 75 ISD 20.28 Toll gates at ' Coronado SD 122.26; �Ba Jet 5 Nonflammables / corrosives or explosives on Coronado Bay Bridge '' Y g } 'Bridge. _- _ End of 8th / ^^ 0.25 miles 80 'SF 4.92 5th St. Viaduct in ,ALA 12.20 east of Bay ilNo flammable tank vehicles �or San Bridge toll explosives. Francisco Plaza ,plaza - k83 aseline I Rd. / 16th 1 :No -_ commercial trucks over 5 lSBD ''13.46. ,SBD 14.19 �St. in Jet 30 Mons. tons. ;Upland - - Trucks restricted from 84 ALA 10.83 1Rte 238 GALA 1 ` 680 transporting hazardous materials Mission Rd. waste due to adjacent drinking - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- water source. �I�r -�� No trucks over 9,000 poundsM '85 ]SCL !,10.00 'Jet 101 ISCL 18.45 Rte 280 i gross vehicle weight. Road I ,maintenance and emergency i i i 110 'LA Jct 101 LA 31.911 I lCarlton Rd. 152 SCR ;Inear 'SCL ;5.03 , i lWatsonville 1154 ;TSB 8.11 .170 LA 110.69 I � 175 MEN' 5.40 183 !MON 9.00 buses, and RVs Jlenarm St. iI "o trucks over 6,000 lbs gross n Pasadena ,ivehicle weight unless making nick ups or deliveries. Watsonville' Zd. near :I o trucks or combinations Jilroy ;,over 45 feet in length. j Rte 101 in o hazardous materials / Rte 246 PB 32.281 Santa aste except pickup and i Barbara deliver - - - -- — - - -- -- - - -- y - - - Turning movement restriction. Trucks can't use the on -ramp from Rte 170 to northbound Rte 101. Trucks that want to go northbound on 101 from 170 must use a detour. From northbound 170, take a right on Odin St. Follow Odin to Cahuenga Blvd. Take a left on Cahuenga and follow it to the northbound 101 on -ramp. Guide signs - are - posted. 5.4 miles j . Jct Rte east of Rte I'LAK 1118.19 29 north of o vehicles over 39 feet. i 101 i Kelseyville i I F Jct 156MON X9.98 Jct 1 7Nok over 7 tons allowed OUND only. 5 ;246 ;SB 18.30 4Lompoc SB J9.55 W. Jct Rte 1 jNo trucks over 3 tons. I -- ICity Limits { Trucks restricted from Central ( ( transporting hazardous 1260 IALA '0.62 Ave. in IALA ;11.92 Jct 880 materials / waste due to Alameda ! adjacent drinking water i asource. f 'Blvd. in �, IGrand Ave. No trucks over 4.5 tons except; `580 IALA 34.88' !ALA 43.61 ! ISan '_ lin Oakland 'buses. ILeandro Conclusion The NHS designation can remain on a state highway that imposes a truck restriction but it requires a two - thirds vote from the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to approve it. More importantly, however, since the enactment of the Federal Aviation Authorization Act of 1994, neither a state or political subdivision of a state may enact a regulation related to the price, route, or service of any motor carrier of property, excluding safety regulations issued by the State. Therefore, any restriction imposed by the CTC will require a strong and compelling safety justification. In light of the fact that the only justification for a truck restriction on a State highway is based on safety, we see no need to proceed with Task 2 as currently defined, "Steps Necessary to Remove the NHS Designation." Instead, we recommend redefining the scope of Tasks 2 to conduct a safety analysis of the route and determine whether or not a safety justification exists to prohibit truck traffic between State Route 23 and State Route 34. We have included with this letter our revised fee and scope for Task 2, "Conduct a safety analysis of State Route 118 between State Route 23 and State Route 34. " Please review it at your leisure and let me know how you wish to proceed. I look forward to meeting with you and further discussing our findings and their implications. Please do not hesitate to call me at (626) 440 -3448 if you have any questions. Sincerely, PARSONS Tony Velasquez, P.E. Engineering Manager cc: Lenwood Howell Attachment: Truck Network on California State Highway, District 7 ,a. r -A"h'A 3 Task 2.0 Conduct A Safety Analysis On State Route 118 Between State Route 23 and State Route 34. Objective: Determine whether or not a safety justification exists to prohibit truck traffic between State Route 23 and State Route 34. Approach: Parsons staff will examine the existing roadway geometry and determine if there are any nonstandard design features that make the existing route susceptible to truck - traffic related accidents. Additionally, the Parsons staff will review any existing traffic accident data with Caltrans, the City of Moorpark, and the California Highway Patrol to determine the nature of the accidents that have occurred on the route and to determine how safe the route is compared to other similar routes in the State. Deliverable: A letter describing whether or not the existing roadway geoinetty is a contributing factor in truck- traffic related accidents and whether or not there are strong and compelling safety reasons to prohibit truck traffic on State Route 118. f"� 0 ITEM 1• g- r, C -2. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT 1, TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works XGY---- DATE: October 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 11 -6 -02) SUBJECT: Underground Conversion of Electrical Transmission Lines on Los Angeles Avenue DISCUSSION A. Background 1. A number of years ago the City pursued efforts to form an Underground Utility District along Los Angeles Avenue between Moorpark Avenue and Shasta Avenue - the commercial core of the Los Angeles Avenue corridor. There were not sufficient Rule 20A accruals available at that time to finance that project. [See Exhibit 2 for a brief discussion of Public Utility Commission (PUC) Rule 20A pertaining to the funding of underground utility conversion projects.] 2. Later the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) developed a need to add power distribution lines along Los Angeles Avenue, which would have required the replacement of all of the existing wooden poles along this street from Gabbert Road and Millard Street. The City worked with SCE to have the SCE funds "earmarked" for that project combined with available Rule 20A accruals to finance a project to underground all of the wires (electrical distribution, telephone, cable television, etc.) along that reach except the six (6) high voltage transmission lines at the top of the poles. 3. The City then adopted Resolution No. 2000 -1693 forming Underground Utility District 2000 -1 [UUD2000 -11. That District implemented the above agreement by requiring the removal of all overhead wires, except the transmission lines, on any poles along Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Millard Street. SCE is in the final stages of the implementation of that District. UUD_LA— AVE_0210 ��yj . U 0 �t.l' J Fa Underground Utilities October 24, 2002 Page 2 B. Existing Utilities Attached as Exhibit 1 is a map showing the status of the overhead utilities along Los Angeles Avenue, subsequent to the completion of the implementation of UUD No. 2000 -1, which is now being finalized by SCE. Area Limits Type A Westerly City Limit to Mira Sol Drive Trans. & Dist. B Mira Sol Drive to Gabbert Road Distribution C Gabbert Road to Shasta Avenue Transmission D Shasta Avenue to Moorpark Avenue Transmission E Moorpark Avenue to Millard Street Transmission F Millard Street to Spring Road Distribution G Spring Road to West of Bridge None H West of Bridge to Freeway Distribution Note: Segment D: The original limits of the prior effort to form an Underground Utility District. Segment C, D & E: The limits of UUD 2000 -1. C. Re -Cap of UUD 2000 -1 Project The estimated costs to SCE for the implementation of UUD 2000- 1 is summarized as follows: Description Amount ($) SCE's Pole Replacement Monies 740,000 City's Rule 20 A Accruals 820,000 Total 1,560,000 D. Rule 20A Accruals 1. Current Status: The current status of City Rule 20A Accruals is as follows: Description Amount ($) Total Rule 20A Accruals: 1983 Tfn December 2002 771,731 Less Rule 20 A Accruals Applied to UUD 2000 -1 (820,000) Total (48,269) UUD_LA_AVE_0210 �) 0 0 9 CS Underground Utilities October 24, 2002 Page 3 2. Accrual Rate: Projected future Rule 20A accruals are summarized as follows: There has been interest expressed in Description Amt. Aomied ($) Acc. Total ($) Available Fble 20AAccnials as of 1/1/02 utilities (48,269) Year. 2003 62,874 14,605 Year 2004 62,874 77,479 Year 2005 62,874 140,353 Years: 2006 - 2010 [5 years] 314,370 454,723 Years: 2011- 2020 [10 years] 628,740 1,083,463 Years: 2021- 2030 [10 years] 628,740 1,712,203 Years: 2031- 2040 [10 years] 628,740 2,340,943 Note: The above projection is based upon the assumption that the annual Rule 20A Accruals will continue to be authorized by the CPUC. Also, the above projection does not provide for increasing accrual amounts which will result from the projected growth in the number of electrical services in the City. E. Candidate Areas for Underground Utility Project There has been interest expressed in developing a project to underground the remainder of the overhead utilities (and remove the poles) along the Los Angeles Avenue corridor. The estimated cost for the design and construction of such a project (see map attached as Exhibit 1) is as follows: Segment Limits Trans Dist $ /Ft Length (ft) Cost ($) A West Limit to Mira Sol x x 540 4000 2,160,000 B Mira Sol to Gabbert x 240 600 144,000 C Gabbert to Shasta x 300 2,700 810,000 D Shasta to Moorpark Ave. x 300 2,800 840,000 E Morpark Ave. to Millard x 300 1,000 300,000 F Millard to Spring x 240 1,200 288,000 G Spring to W/O Bridge None None 800 0 H W/O Bridge to Freeway x 240 2,400 576,000 Total 15,500 5,118,000 UUD_LA_AVE_0210 C Q () 0 9 Underground Utilities October 24, 2002 Page 4 F. Funding Alternatives Funding Sources for such a project include: • General Fund [Fund 10001 • Endowment Fund [Fund 2000] • Gas Tax Fund [Fund 2503] • TDA Article 8 (LTF) [Fund 2603] • Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fund [Fund 2501] { { * *1} • Formation of an Improvement Assessment District H * * }1: If constructed as a part of a road improvement project. G. Suaaested Protect Description 1. Scope: It is recommended below that staff be directed to proceed with efforts necessary to develop a project to "underground" the transmission lines within Segment D [Shasta Avenue to Moorpark Avenue] and Segment E [Moorpark Avenue to Millard Street]. 2. Segment D: The segment between Shasta Avenue is the central business core Avenue corridor, and was the original the formation of an Underground Util years ago. Approval and implementation accomplish that objective. Avenue and Moorpark of the Los Angeles area considered for ity District several of this project will 3. Segment E: The Los Angeles Avenue widening project, between Moorpark Avenue and Spring Road, will require the relocation of a number of the poles east of Moorpark Avenue. It has not yet been determined if the cost of that relocation would be borne by the City or by SCE. Regardless of who is the "responsible party" those costs could, instead, be applied to the cost of undergrounding. 4. Project Cost Estimate: The preliminary estimate for the cost of this project is as follows: Description Cost ($) Segment D 840,000 Segment E 300,000 Total 1,140,000 5. District Formation: UUD 2000 -1 [Gabbert Road to Millard Street] required the undergrounding of all lines except the transmission lines. It would be necessary to form a new district in order to use Rule 20A funds to require the undergrounding of the transmission lines in Segments D & E. UUD LA AVE 0210 eta, Underground Utilities October 24, 2002 Page 5 6. Project Location: Staff has been advised that the underground conduits for the transmission lines would have to be placed on the south side of the street in order to provide the required separation between these facilities and the existing underground distribution system. 7. Project Scheduling: It is estimated that the project approval/ funding approval and design process would take about two years. Optimistically construction could begin, therefore, in 2005. With that schedule, this work would not be in conflict with a Calleguas Municipal Water District project planned for 2003 for the placement of a 72" water line down the middle of Los Angeles Avenue. 8. Los Angeles Avenue Widening Project: The City (with the assistance of its consultant) is working with Caltrans to seek approval of the design for the widening of Los Angeles Avenue between Moorpark Road and Spring Road. When the design has been completed, efforts will begin on the acquisition of the additional street right -of -way required for this project. That effort is expected to require a significant amount of time. It is possible that all of those efforts will be completed and the project will be ready to construct prior to 2005. It is also possible that this street realignment and widening project will not be delayed by the planned undergrounding date of 2005. 9. Projected Rule 2OA Accruals: It is estimated that, by Year 2005, there will be approximately $400,000 of Rule 20A monies available for this project. That calculation is as follows: Description Amount ($) Current Rule 20A Accruals (48,269) 2003 & 2004 Accrual 129,748 Sub -Total 81,479 Five Year Advance [2005 - 2009] 324,370 Total 405,849 Note: It will be necessary to confirm this estimate with SCE. 10.AD92 -1: A portion of the funding for provided by monies generated by AD92 -1 \ \earmarked" for underground utilities. those funds is $426,477. UUD LA AVE 0210 this project would be [Mission Bell Plaza] The current amount of C 0010; I Underground Utilities October 24, 2002 Page 6 11.Possible Funding Source Projection /Estimate: Based on the above assumptions, the sources and amounts required to fund this project are estimated as follows: Description Amount ($) Rule 20A Accruals 405,849 AD92 -1 [Fund 2330] 426,477 L. A Ave. AOC Fund [Fund 2502] 307,674 Total 1,140,000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to proceed with steps necessary to develop a project for the undergrounding of the transmission lines between Shasta Avenue and Millard Street [Segments D & E]. W D LA AVE-0210 L 0 0 10 7,d 4-) UA .mj �J ,7; 0 vi (D IF ��\ \\\_ �� _,� ��) � 1 �_��>~2��( l4�1� 4 11.` >�, ,�/ y/ X11 � � �� _� W � 11I�p 1:h )� -71 % -. - - _ -- I 4 � �?�_ 1611 A /AH) , � C�`¢ ti:: -a IP T=F 0 C) 0 Kc Lm Cl ci T=F 0 C) 0 Kc Exhibit 2: Background Information on Underground Utility District Funding Page 1 The following is a brief summary of the rules and regulations pertaining to the establishment of Underground Utility Districts. 1. Authority: A 1968 ruling by the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) set aside a portion of annual electrical utility receipts for the purpose of undergrounding overhead utility lines. These funds are governed by PUC Rule 20A. 2. Rule 20A: Rule 20A funds began to be accrued by California public agencies in 1984. Through the year 2002, the City of Moorpark has accrued Rule 20A entitlements in the amount of $xxx,000. Rule 20A entitlements do not accrue interest, nor are they forwarded to and held by any City. Instead, each year the accrued Rule 20A entitlement to date is reported to each City. Whenever a city elects to use its Rule 20A accruals, it forms an Underground Utility District designating the affected area and specifying the utilities and /or poles prohibited within that affected area. When such a district is formed, SCE will use its technical support staff to design the project and implement the District. SCE costs for such a project are charged to the city's Rule 20A entitlements. Any other "prohibited" overhead utility facilities on the affected poles must be removed from the poles and placed underground by, and at the cost of, the owner of that /those utilities (telephone, cable television, etc.). Excerpt from Rule 20A: Rule 20A funds can be used for any project, which is at least 600 feet in length and found to meet one or more of the following criteria: a. Such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric facilities. b. The street or road or right -of -way is extensively used by the general public and carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. c. The street is through a civic area or is a scenic route. 3. Utility Pole Terminology: An overhead utility pole may carry many types of wires at the same time: a. "Electric transmission" lines are the main high voltage trunk lines that carry power from a substation to transformers. The high voltage transmission lines along Los Angeles Avenue carry 66,000 volts (66kv). Because of the very high voltage, the wires must be carried taller (90' on Los Angeles Avenue) utility poles. UUD LA AVE 0210 r: Exhibit 2: Background Information on Underground Utility District Funding Page 2 b. "Electric distribution" lines carry lower voltages (typically 16,000 volts) on shorter poles throughout the City, to transformers and eventually to residences and business. c. "Telephone" lines and "cable television" lines may be carried on poles that also carry transmission or distribution lines. d. "Line Separation" is required when a utility pole carries a combination of different utility lines. The required separation is typically at least ten feet (10'). UUD LA_AVE_0210 �; I'VE 9 • e . MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT�!nt TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Service DATE: October 15, 2002 (CC Meeting of November 6) SUBJECT: Consider Art In Public Places Project For Moorpark Marketplace (CPD 2001 -01) BACKGROUND As a condition of the Commercial Planned Development Permit, CPD 2001 -01, for Tract 5321, Moorpark Marketplace, the developer ( Zelman) was required to prepare and install a public art project on -site. The approved art project must be completed prior to the issuance of the first building occupancy. If the City and developer had agreed to an in- lieu in place of an art project, the fee would have equaled $35,767 based on 357,671 square feet of building space. DISCUSSION The City's Art in Public Places Committee met on September 9, 2002, to review the Zelman art project. The Committee is comprised of: two Councilmembers, Clint Harper and Keith Millhouse; one Parks and Recreation Commissioner, Sandra Thompson; and two members -at- large, Mary Schwabauer and Jay Moore. Staff members in attendance included Barry Hogan, Director of Community Development, and Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services. The art project submitted by Zelman consists of a rectangular fountain of approximately 42 feet in length and a little over 10 feet in width. The fountain is incorporated under the arched walls of the food court arcade. The center of the fountain consists of a long row of water jets and the walls of the arcade will have vine - like plants growing up the face. U)0i0 (4 Honorable City Council November 6, 2002 Page 2 The Arts in Public Places Committee members had various comments. Most liked the concept of a fountain. The consensus of the Committee was that a bronze statue of a child sitting on the fountain's seat wall would enhance its visual appeal. Additionally, the Committee felt that landscaping was needed along the front of the fountain from the parking lot side to enhance its look and discourage children from attempting to access the fountain. The Committee also requested that the water spray from the fountain be of varied height, that underwater lights be added to illuminate the water spray, and features be incorporated in the fountain's seat walls to discourage skateboarders. At its meeting on October 9, the City Council indicated that it wanted to see the store signs removed from the arcade wall over the fountain. The changes requested by the Committee and Council have been made and the developer has submitted a new set of plans, which were provided to the Council under separate cover. STAFF RECOWONDATION Approve Zelman's (CPD 2001 -01) Art In Public Places project as submitted. M: MLindley\Public Art\narketplace art project ccagd.doc CITY CF `TOOP.F ^P K, C JT-PT? N'T,1 City Cc? ?n --'- of I l' (e --UCCA ACT 's)IN • dw" P,—A' if R oorpark,_ Califoxiiia I-' lo. A. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL October 8, 2002 An Adjourned Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on October 8, 2002, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. Mayor Hunter announced that the adjourned meeting was called to discuss Item 10.A., which was continued from the October 2, 2002, regular meeting. 2. INVOCATION: None. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Harper led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Mikos, Millhouse, Harper, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: None. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: None. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 October 8, 2002 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Proposed Sign Program for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace - 357,621 Square Foot Commercial Center) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. (Continued from September 18, 2002 meeting and October 2, 2002 meeting.) Staff Recommendation: Approve the Master Sign Program subject to the staff recommended modifications. Mr. Porter gave the staff report. Brian Wolfe, P & R Architects, 111 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 2100, Long Beach, California, representing the applicant, discussed revisions to the sign elevations and presented four alternatives, which due to limited time did not include the final architectural details. He stated that changes in the alternatives included: the division of panels to a side by side configuration; the reduction in letter height from 36- inches to 30- inches; and a reduction in the total height of the sign from 78- feet to 52 -feet. Mr. Wolfe presented renderings of four options, including line of sight versions as seen from Los Angeles Avenue, along with aerial simulations of the entire center. He went on to state that all the options are of similar height with Option D having the least mass. Veronica Fischer, a Moorpark resident, stated her support for the project. Ms. Fischer described the difficulty in getting companies such as Target to locate to a City with a population such as Moorpark's; the benefit of Target coming to Moorpark will be the attraction of other desirable retail tenants; the increased sales tax revenue for the City; and the eagerness with which residents are awaiting this project. Kevin Mauch, a Moorpark resident, stated that he did not support the billboard type signage; the Council should not give in to the developer's claims that they cannot make a go of it without the sign; and residents would not be in favor of this pole sign. C f �J I -) Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 October 8, 2002 Pierce Verleur, a Moorpark resident, questioned the need for the sign to attract customers from the freeway since the customer -base for the center will be predominately from within the City of Moorpark not from residents of Simi Valley or from the 101 freeway corridor. Lise Houston, a Moorpark resident, stated her support for the retail development and the proposed stores; that the freeway sign is unnecessary for generating business; and that if there must be sign, a shorter version would be an improvement. Mark Armbruster, representing Cypress Land Company, 2121 Avenue of The Stars, Los Angeles, California, stated that he looks forward to the synergy between the commercial and industrial projects; he cares about the success of the shopping center; and from his company's viewpoint, freeway signage is needed to ensure that the center is successful. Councilmember Harper asked if any Councilmembers liked any of the four options. Councilmember Mikos discussed the need for a compromise between the Council's objections to the signage and the applicant's need to have the signs. She went on to state that she supports the center, which has already been approved; a decision still needs to be made about how the sign will look; there is no guarantee which tenants will occupy the center; she is pleased with the overall design of the center; the sign options presented are not that desirable; the whiteness of the panels makes it difficult to visualize the signs with more detail; and she would like to hear from the rest of the Council before making a decision. Councilmember Wozniak stated that Option D resembles a power pole; he is not favorably impressed with the white area on the signs; the reduction in height is an improvement; and a pitched roof could improve the appearance of the top. He stated that the height of the sign should be determined by the Council at this meeting and the design should come back for approval, allowing time for the applicant to work with Target to illustrate the embellishments. Councilmember Harper stated that the proposal looks like a billboard; he concurs with Councilmember Wozniak that Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 October 8, 2002 more design work is needed to add character to the sign; retailers look at the City of Moorpark as a marginal market area and feel it is necessary to have adequate signage if they are to locate here; and with modifications, Option C or D have potential. Councilmember Millhouse stated that he did not vote in support of the project; he does not like the tenant mix; this is a lower -end shopping center and the City of Moorpark deserves better; the freeway signage is not needed; the decision to have a sign has already been approved by the Council; he is willing to take the chance that Target will not leave if the Council takes back their decision for the sign; the design of the sign needs to be determined; he does not like the new options, which look like a billboard; and he might be able to support the original pylon -type design with a reduction in height. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny confirmed that the location and height of the signage have previously been determined by the Council. Mayor Hunter stated that what is left to be determined is the architecture; the applicant indicates the architectural details are missing due to time constraints, so there is nothing to decide; and there is a 24 -foot sign to be located on Los Angeles Avenue, east of Miller Parkway, which also needs to be considered as part of this sign program. Councilmember Mikos stated that the advantage of the lower signage is view preservation; she is concerned about Councilmember Harper's suggestions for archways, which will create greater mass for the lower signs; there are no renderings depicting what larger, low signs will look like; it is difficult to make a decision without seeing that design; the columns depicted in the new design do not blend with rest of the architecture in the center; renderings are needed showing embellished versions of the signs; she can go either way on the 24- foot pylon sign, which does blend with the architectural style of the center and is the same height as the signs at Ralphs Center and Mission Bell Plaza; she is concerned about the plain and ordinary appearance of the 12 -foot high monument sign near the corner of Miller Parkway and New Los Angeles Avenue, which depicts the minor tenants' names; and that the same font for the lettering "Moorpark Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 October 8, 2002 Marketplace" should be used on the big tower as is depicted on the three entry monument signs. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that the 12 -foot high monument sign is the only identification for the twelve or more, smaller tenants tucked back in the center. He deferred to Mr. Exel to elaborate. Robert Exel, representing Zelman Retail Partners, Inc., 515 South Figueroa, Suite 515, Los Angeles, California, stated that all of the tenants do not need to be on the 12 -foot monument sign; two restaurant pads, which are below grade, would need to be named on the sign; and the seven panels on the freeway sign are reserved for the five major tenants along with two restaurants. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Exel demonstrated on the site plan where the tenants for the below grade pads are to be located. Councilmember Millhouse stated that there is too much signage on the project; he agrees with Mayor Hunter that excess signage located in public locations must be removed; and until an acceptable design for the large sign comes back to the Council and /or additional signage is removed, he cannot support this sign program. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Councilmember Millhouse stated that all the signage along the food court area needs to be an art piece not an advertisement; the 12 -foot high sign along Los Angeles Avenue is unnecessary if the 78 -foot sign is approved; and that the entryway signs should be better designed to resemble entryway features such as those at the Promenade. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny confirmed that as part of the amendment to the Settlement Agreement, the Air Quality fee was reduced for this project by about one million dollars. Councilmember Harper stated that this center is a great addition to the community; other communities have developed these smaller centers prior to acquiring the major retailers like the ones at the Promenade; and that this center would allow local residents to do the majority of their shopping in Moorpark. He asked the Council to concentrate on one element of the sign program at a time, in order to give the applicant more focused Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 direction. October 8, 2002 Mayor Hunter concurred and stated that it would better serve the public and the applicant if there was closure on the project rather than returning to another meeting. He asked the Council what direction they would like to focus on the major sign at the corner. Councilmember Wozniak stated that the taller pylon sign is not necessary; the 24 -foot sign should be reduced in size; and the panels of advertising can be split between it and the 12 -foot sign. He went on to state that without renderings it is difficult to decide what the signs are going to look like. Mr. Kueny suggested reaching a consensus on the tall pylon sign and summarized: Option 1) the 78 -foot sign as originally proposed; Option 2) reduce the panel size on the original proposal and decrease the height to 72 -feet; Option 3) a 52 -foot sign with the addition of approximately 4 feet for adding a roof element; and Option 4) eliminate a panel and create an approximate 68- foot high sign. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that the roof design could be revised; one sign panel could be split into two panels; and one panel could be eliminated with a reduction in the height of the signage to approximately 66 -feet or less. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that the fundamental design would remain that of the 78 -foot tower. Councilmember Mikos asked if Planning Commissioner, Mark DiCecco, would comment on the design. Commissioner DiCecco, based his comments on the pylon sign and stated that the applicant's suggestion that the sign could be 21 -feet wide rather than 42 -feet wide would make it more proportional to a bell tower; signage on only two sides would leave an opportunity for a clock face on the other two sides; and that his preference would be for a taller, narrower sign, as opposed to a wider more massive sign. Councilmember Harper stated that a taller bell tower would be the highest element in the City and would become C t) I I —I -? Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 October 8, 2002 more of a landmark; he could support the taller version with modifications, if that is the Council's desire, however his preference is for a lower, wider, more conventional sign for a shopping center along with better detail. Councilmember Mikos stated that the only way to reach a decision is to see what the different renderings would look like. She concurred with Councilmember Wozniak that the 24 -foot corner sign is not necessary with the tall pylon sign. Mayor Hunter stated that the applicant is directed to return with renderings showing a variation of the 78 -foot high sign and a variation of the three options, presented at this meeting, excluding Option D, all of which will include sufficient embellishment to show architectural detail. Councilmember Millhouse stated that direction should be given regarding the three options. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that they would try to provide renderings of a 66 -foot high variation of the 78 -foot high sign and a rendering of the version of the lower, wider sign by Tuesday preceding the next meeting. Mr. Kueny stated that if it is the consensus of the Council that the 66 -foot variation with details from the original 78 -foot sign is preferable to the more massive shorter sign, he would like to avoid the difficulty of coordinating the distribution of renderings by deferring to Mr. Hogan to bring the sign into conformance. Councilmember Wozniak concurred and requested that Mr. Hogan approve the sign at 66 -feet or less in height. There was no Council consensus on deferral of approval to Mr. Hogan. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mayor Hunter stated that clock elements should be included in the renderings and if the Council determines they are not attractive they can be eliminated. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that it would be better to focus on one design rather than A Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 October 8, 2002 prepare renderings of each of the lower signs and requested that the Council direct which one they would like to emphasize. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated he was not sure that freeway views of the sign could be completed by the following week. Mayor Hunter stated that by a straw poll it can be concluded that there is not support for a 52 -foot by 42- foot sign and that the architect should focus on a 66- foot or less by 21 -foot sign with sufficient detail for the Council to render a decision. Mr. Kueny read the Settlement Agreement language regarding the 24 -foot and 12 -foot signs. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kueny stated that that the Council has discretion over the location and design of the signage. Mr. Wolfe stated that they height of the 24 -foot sign panels on the other sign. will attempt to reduce the and reduce the number of In response to Mr. Mikos, Mayor Hunter stated that the Master Sign Program has to be adopted as a program. Councilmember Harper stated that he would like to see the 24 -foot sign reduced in height; the number of panels reduced; and that if the direction of the Council is to make the tower on the corner the most prominent feature of the center, he will reluctantly agree. Mayor Hunter stated that the 24 -foot and 12 -foot high monument signs target the same audience along New Los Angeles Avenue. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that the two signs are approximately 300 -feet apart; the signs are located west of the driveway; different tenants are identified on the two signs; street identification is needed for the tenants; and that street signage will be necessary as the landscaping matures and screens the building signs. In response to Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Millhouse's concern regarding the advertising placed on the `Arts in Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 October 8, 2002 Public Places" portion of the center, Mr. Wolfe stated that the signage near the fountain can be reduced, but the side panels will need to remain. Councilmember Harper stated that he did not object to signage on the colonnade, which is adjacent to the water feature, not directly on the fountain; the center needs a reasonable amount of signage to be successful; and the Council needs to achieve closure on the sign issue in order for the center to move forward. Councilmember Millhouse stated that the fountain element was an attempt at "Art in Public Places "; the colonnade is critical to the water fountain element, because it helps shield the diners from the parking lot; and he is concerned that waiving the Arts in Public Places fees, which could have been used for actual art in the community, is not the correct thing to do. Councilmember Harper stated that the signage on the colonnade will not be visible from the food court; the signage will not detract from the outside dining experience; the fee is not being waived, rather the developer is allowed to produce some art object for the project or pay "in lieu" fees. Mayor Hunter stated that other fees are being waived on this project as part of the project approval. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that he has sufficient direction on the freeway oriented sign, but he is unclear on the other signs and the colonnade. Mr. Kueny summarized that on the colonnade the signs should be moved away from the fountain; the 24 -foot sign should be reduced in height to approximately 20 feet with no specific direction as to how to accomplish that; and a the 12 -foot high monument sign should be reduced in height along with a reduction in the number of panels from twelve to eight. A discussion followed among the Councilmembers regarding a date for continuance. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 October 8, 2002 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to: 1) direct the applicant to return with a variation of the freeway oriented pylon sign not to exceed 66 -feet in height by approximately 21 -feet in width with a clock face on two sides; 2) move the colonnade signs away from the fountain; 3) reduce the height of the 24 -foot sign to approximately 20 feet; 4) reduce the height of the 12 -foot high monument sign and the number of panels from twelve to eight; and 5) continue the meeting to the October 16, 2002, regular meeting which would be adjourned to Thursday, October 17, 2002. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated he would try to have the rendering of the freeway sign available for the Council to review on the Tuesday prior to the meeting date. 14. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wosniak seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 8:21 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk L iP, 10/29/02 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100011000000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 11.10 M101002 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 11.10 100011000000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 47.17 M101002 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 47.17 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 58.27 58.27 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY COUNCIL NET PAYABLE 58.27 58.27 100021000000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 53.61 M101002 MARTIN- SOFTWARE BOOK 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 53.61 100021000000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 5.00 M101002 RILEY -PRKNG REIMBURS 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 5.00 100021000000 9240 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 18.72 M101002 KUENY - COUNTRY DAYS M 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 18.72 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 77.33 77.33 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE 77.33 77.33 100031100000 9236 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 52.30 M101002 BRAND -CS ASSISTANT I 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 52.30 100031100000 9236 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 10.00 M101002 DMV REPORT REIMBURSE 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 10.00 100031100000 9236 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 5.00 M101002 DMV REPORT REIMBURSE 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 5.00 100031100000 9236 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 11.16 M101002 ORAL BOARD REFRESHME 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 11.16 100031100000 9236 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 14.15 M101002 ORAL BOARD REFRESHME 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 14.15 100031100000 9224 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 7.30 M101002 FRETZ- MILEAGE REIMBU 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 7.30 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 99.91 99.91 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 99 91 99.91 100051000000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 19.61 f� 4. RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING � 03 r: 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT M101002 VIDEOTAPES -ASD INTER 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 100051000000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 VIDEOTAPES -ASD INTER 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100051100000 9225 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 SZABO -PRKNG REIMBURS 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 100051100000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 SANQUSIT -CSMFO LUNCH 20 8/26 - 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL FINANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL FINANCE NET PAYABLE 100071000000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 LINDLEY -PRKNG REIMBU 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100076100000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 SR CTR FINE ART DISP 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 100076100000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 SR CTR ART DISPLAY S 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE 100076107601 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 M101002 SR CTR BUNCO TIMER 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SENIOR GAMES CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR GAMES NET PAYABLE 100076107619 9208 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 SR CTR FRAMES 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 Fp � v: RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:21 .j 0.00 10/10/02 0.00 0.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 19.61 19.61 19.61 39.22 39.22 39.22 39.22 5.95 5.95 15.00 15.00 20.95 20.95 20.95 20.95 8.00 8.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 8.00 8.00 24.12 24.12 5.68 5.68 29.80 29.80 29.80 29.80 13.91 13.91 13.91 13.91 44.14 44.14 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100076107619 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 7.63 M101002 SR CTR PHOTO DEVELOP 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 7.63 100076107619 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 28.93 M101002 SR CTR -DISP CAMERAS 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 28.93 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT 80.70 TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 80.70 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP CHECK AMT 80.70 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP NET PAYABLE 80.70 100076300000 9222 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 25.00 M101002 SHAW- WORKSHOP FEES R 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 25.00 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT 25.00 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 25.00 100076307603 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 50.00 M101002 SKATE CONTEST SUPPLI 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 50.00 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS CHECK AMT 50.00 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE 50.00 100076307613 9244 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 49.13 M101002 TRICK OR TREAT VILLA 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 49.13 TOTAL HALLOWEEN CHECK AMT 49.13 TOTAL HALLOWEEN NET PAYABLE 49.13 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT 552.22 TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 552.22 RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 c PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 10/29/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA NET PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 10/10/02 30.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 2000 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 10/10/02 15.00 0.00 0.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 200082100000 9304 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 XGUARD SEAMSTRESS SV 20 8/26 - 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 200082100000 9304 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 XGUARD SEAMSTRESS SV 20 8/26 - 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE 200083300000 9254 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 DISTILLED WATER -CAR 20 8/26 - 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE p� t, RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 i PAGE 4 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/10/02 30.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 10/10/02 15.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 0.00 10/10/02 3.42 0.00 0.00 3.42 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 3.42 3.42 48.42 48.42 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 220064400000 9205 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 18.87 M101002 COM DEV GRAPHIC SUPP 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 18.87 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT 18.87 TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE 18.87 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 18.87 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 18.87 RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING f iii 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 240078000000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 M101002 CASILLAS- SEMINAR LUN 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE l J RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 PAGE 6 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 10/10/02 14.78 0.00 14.78 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 14.78 14.78 14.78 14.78 10/29/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA NET PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 10/10/02 1.61 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX 10/10/02 15.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT 10/10/02 CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 260583100000 9232 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 POSTNET PHOTOCOPIES 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 260583100000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 93.15 10/10/02 1101 93.15 M101002 MORGENSTERN -MSA LUNC 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 260583100000 9232 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 POSTNET PHOTOCOPIES 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 260583100000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 GILBERT,MATHEWS -APWA 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 260583100000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 M101002 MCBRIDE - SEMINAR LUNC 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 F+cr G V PAGE 7 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/10/02 1.61 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 10/10/02 15.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 10/10/02 21.75 0.00 0.00 21.75 0.00 10/10/02 40.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 10/10/02 14.79 0.00 0.00 14.79 93.15 93.15 93.15 93.15 93.15 93.15 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 290224100000 9223 CITY OF MOORPARK N 10/10/02 1101 0.00 10/10/02 10.00 M101002 HERNANDEZ -VCCF SEMIN 20 8/26- 10/2/02 10/10/02 110895 0.00 0.00 10.00 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 10.00 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 10.00 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT 10.00 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE 10.00 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT 737.44 TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE 737.44 ll RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 16:55:22 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 100076100000 9231 U.S. POSTMASTER N 10/17/02 1101 0.00 10/17/02 M101702 11 /02SR CTR POSTAGE 20 NOVEMBER 02 10/17/02 110896 0.00 0.00 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE 100076107601 9244 CHUY'S MESQUITE BROI N M101702 SR GAMES CLOSING LUN 20 SR GAMES TOTAL SENIOR GAMES CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR GAMES NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE T r RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 17:03:52 10/17/02 1101 0.00 10/17/02 10/17/02 110897 0.00 0.00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 340.00 340.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 340.00 340.00 339.76 339.76 339.76 339.76 679.76 679.76 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C. BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 250183108003 9610 CAMARILLO ESCROW COM N 10/17/02 1101 M101702 LA AVE WIDENING -MAUR 20 PROPERTY ACQ 10/17/02 110901 TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM CHECK AMT TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 17:03:52 PAGE 2 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/17/02 46025.00 0.00 0.00 46025.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 46025.00 46025.00 46025.00 46025.00 10/29/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 6158.46 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 0.00 1100.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT 0.00 CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290124202001 9285 HERNANDEZ, ENRIQUE N 10/17/02 1101 M101702 RENTAL ASSISTANCE 20 SPACE #25 10/17/02 110899 290124202001 9285 HERNANDEZ, ENRIQUE N 10/17/02 1101 M101702 RESIDENTIAL MOVING E 20 SPACE #25 10/17/02 110898 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 290124202001 9285 FIDELITY NATIONAL TI N 10/17/02 1101 M101702 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 20 SPACE #25 10/17/02 110900 TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE r� PAGE 3 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/17/02 6158.46 0.00 0.00 6158.46 0.00 10/17/02 1100.00 0.00 0.00 1100.00 7258.46 7258.46 0.00 10/17/02 7500.00 0.00 0.00 7500.00 RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 17:03:52 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 14758.46 14758.46 14758.46 14758.46 61463.22 61463.22 10/29/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 100075200000 9321 VAN WATERS & ROGERS N 06/30/02 1101 0.00 AP071702 MOSQUITO TRIETHYLAMI 20 11283452 07/17/02 110028 V 0.00 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE p�rws� RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 17:21:02 PAGE 1 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 06/12/02 -62.06 0.00 -62.06 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING -62.06 -62.06 -62.06 -62.06 -62.06 -62.06 10/29/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 0.00 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 08/15/02 FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC - 7500.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290124202001 9285 HERNANDEZ, ENRIQUE N 10/16/02 1101 AP101602 MOVING /HOUSING EXPEN 20 SPACE #25 10/16/02 110875 V 290124202001 9285 HERNANDEZ, ENRIQUE N 10/16/02 1101 AP101602 HOUSING /MOVING EXPEN 20 SPACE #25 10/16/02 110875 V TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 290124202001 9285 FIDELITY NATIONAL TI N 10/16/02 1101 AP101602 SP #25 RENTAL ASSISTA 20 SPACE #25 10/16/02 110872 V TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 10/29/02 TIME 17:19:06 4.1 PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 08/15/02 - 1100.00 0.00 0.00 - 1100.00 0.00 08/15/02 - 7500.00 0.00 0.00 - 7500.00 - 8600.00 - 8600.00 0.00 08/15/02 - 6158.46 0.00 0.00 - 6158.46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 14758.46 - 14758.46 - 14758.46 - 14758.46 - 14758.46 - 14758.46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 10:14:37 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 110902 1101 10/25/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 110903 1101 10/25/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 110903 1101 10/25/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 110904 1101 10/25/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 110905 1101 10/25/02 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 110906 1101 10/25/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 110907 1101 10/25/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 110908 1101 10/25/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 110908 1101 10/25/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 110909 1101 10/25/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT v' ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- CANCER INSURANCE F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP UNION DUES CASE #SD020444 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION ID #9600616061 F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP P/T REG DEFER COMP PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 AMOUNT 114.32 1,025.60 3,369.84 4,395.44 440.31 2,172.50 118.00 168.46 3,825.29 1,581.12 5,406.41 377.88 13,193.32 13,193.32 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 10/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:14:41 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT pr"o", b� �y AMOUNT 13,193.32 13,193.32 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING SZABO -WEEK END 10/4 686.25 10 /02ANSWERING &FAX DATE: 10/30/02 2 MEASURING TAPES 19.25 WIRE & ABRASIVE WHEEL CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 53.21 MTN MEAD BLEACHERS RE CHECK REGISTER 11 /7CEQA WORKSHOP FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 50.00 6479 -B PENN REP WINDO 204.76 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 110910 1101 10/30/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 110911 1101 10/30/02 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 110912 1101 10/30/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 110912 1101 10/30/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 110912 1101 10/30/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9204 9 /20KIDS NIGHT OUT TOTAL CHECK 70.56 REFUND -COED VOLLEYBAL 39.00 110913 1101 10/30/02 1012 ACCURATE WELDING 9252 110914 1101 10/30/02 1017 AEP 9222 110915 1101 10/30/02 3313 AGUILERA, ABEL 3301 110916 1101 10/30/02 3330 ALADDIN GLASS SERVICE 9252 110917 1101 10/30/02 1905 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITURE 9208 110917 1101 10/30/02 1905 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITURE 9208 TOTAL CHECK 110918 1101 10/30/02 1025 ALL -AIRE / AIR EXPRESS 9103 110918 1101 10/30/02 1025 ALL -AIRE / AIR EXPRESS 9103 TOTAL CHECK 110919 1101 10/30/02 3079 AMEBA -CHEM, INC. 9220 110920 1101 10/30/02 2040 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATI 9620 110920 1101 10/30/02 2040 AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATI 9620 TOTAL CHECK 110921 1101 10/30/02 3332 AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB 9204 110922 1101 10/30/02 1798 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASS 9221 110923 1101 10/30/02 1030 AMERICAN RED CROSS 9160 110924 1101 10/30/02 2206 ANAHEIM HILTON HOTEL 9225 110925 1101 10/30/02 1037 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER 9205 110925 1101 10/30/02 1037 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER 9204 TOTAL CHECK 110926 1101 10/30/02 1038 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYST 9211 110927 1101 10/30/02 2860 B.T.R. INC. 9244 110928 1101 10/30/02 2350 BATTUNG, RESERVE DEPUTY D 9119 110929 1101 10/30/02 3333 BERNS, GERALDINE 3865 110930 1101 10/30/02 1058 BEST ELECTRIC 9252 010931 1101 10/30/02 3334 BIG TRAY SOUTH 9621 �1- T10932 1101 10/30/02 3335 BLOMENKAMP, TANJIA 3862 �nc r,- PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT SZABO -WEEK END 10/4 686.25 10 /02ANSWERING &FAX 62.95 2 MEASURING TAPES 19.25 WIRE & ABRASIVE WHEEL 32.16 PRESSURE WASHER 0 RIN 1.80 53.21 MTN MEAD BLEACHERS RE 21.45 11 /7CEQA WORKSHOP 140.00 REFUND -CIT# 162081 50.00 6479 -B PENN REP WINDO 204.76 MITY -LITE TABLES 739.71 TABLES FREIGHT 139.27 878.98 CITRUS ROOM THERMOSTA 210.00 APRICOT ROOM A/C REPA 454.50 664.50 MPK PD DRUG ID BIBLES 84.90 AVCP NEW RR PROJECT 98.56 PACKER FOOTBALL RR RN 97.10 195.66 AKC BREED POSTERS 12.00 GILBER 03 APWA MEMBER 125.00 1ST AID CPR & BABYSIT 440.00 CARGNEL,GALITZ LODGIN 501.40 9 /02CH BREAKROOM SUPP 128.54 9 /02VECTOR WATER 12.06 140.60 7 -9/02 METER RENTAL 249.53 9 /20KIDS NIGHT OUT 12.86 3.5HRS SECURITY 70.56 REFUND -COED VOLLEYBAL 39.00 6479 -B PENN POWER OUT 204.76 AVRC DROP IN SINK 718.58 REFUND - CLASSES 313.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 303.00 #4 LUBE, OIL, FILTER DATE: 10/30/02 TRUCK #11 STENCIL 20.97 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 4.5 HRS SECURITY 90.72 CARGNEL,GALITZ REGIST CHECK REGISTER HARTNETT -CPRS MEMBERS FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 50.00 11/22 -26 SEM PER DIEM 250.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 110932 1101 10/30/02 3335 BLOMENKAMP, TANJIA 3862 STRINGER -SLAG SUPPLIE TOTAL CHECK 2.68 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 15.66 110933 1101 10/30/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 110933 1101 10/30/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 FRETZ - HALLOWEEN EMP R TOTAL CHECK 26.26 DMV REPORT REIMBURSEM 10.00 110934 1101 10/30/02 1082 BUILDING NEWS 9220 110935 1101 10/30/02 2868 CABELLI, RESERVE DEPUTY B 9119 110936 1101 10/30/02 3033 CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFIC 9222 110937 1101 10/30/02 1102 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREAT 9221 110938 1101 10/30/02 3315 CAPPUCCINO, ANTONIO 3301 110939 1101 10/30/02 3345 CARGNEL, DEPUTY MARC 9225 110940 1101 10/30/02 1115 CATRAMBONE, JOSEPH F 9001 110941 1101 10/30/02 3206 CHRISTENSEN, MICHAEL S 9244 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9225 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9244 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9244 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9204 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9241 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9236 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9204 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9222 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 110942 1101 10/30/02 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 TOTAL CHECK 110943 1101 10/30/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 110943 1101 10/30/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 110943 1101 10/30/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 110943 1101 10/30/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 110943 1101 10/30/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 TOTAL CHECK 10944 1101 10/30/02 2908 CREATIVE BUS SALES 9505 �t..''10945 1101 10/30/02 1904 CSMFO 9221 r� PAGE NUMBER: 2 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT ADMIN FEE -10.00 303.00 #4 LUBE, OIL, FILTER 23.47 TRUCK #11 STENCIL 20.97 44.44 STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC 137.59 4.5 HRS SECURITY 90.72 CARGNEL,GALITZ REGIST 810.00 HARTNETT -CPRS MEMBERS 125.00 REFIND -CIT #161574 50.00 11/22 -26 SEM PER DIEM 250.00 9 /3COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 STRINGER - FOLDING CRAT 22.08 BURNS -MMASC LUNCHEON 20.00 BURNS - SCANPH PRKNG 4.00 HERNANDEZ -MMASC LUNCH 20.00 STRINGER -SLAG SUPPLIE 41.16 SR CTR FOUNTAIN WATER 2.68 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 15.66 CAMP MPK -35.49 LOOSBROCK -CLASS SUPPL 2.25 TRAN - VECTOR DRY ICE 18.63 DINGMAN -DEPT SUPPLIES 12.84 CHUDOBA -CESA CONF MEA 23.41 GILBERT -APWA LUNCHEON 20.00 FRETZ - HALLOWEEN EMP R 40.00 SR CTR CHILI SUPPLIES 26.26 DMV REPORT REIMBURSEM 10.00 CFCIA LUNCHEON -2 DEPU 45.00 SKATEPARK MAINTENANCE 2.28 CASILLAS - RECERTIFICAT 45.00 MATHEWS -APWA LUNCHEON 20.00 MORGENSTERN -MSA LUNCH 15.00 370.76 PLANNING DIGITAL CAME 149.32 KINGSTON PC CARD READ 31.10 SD RAM MEMORY PRESARI 109.40 COM DEV HP SCANNER 100.82 COM DEV DIGITAL LAMER 240.00 630.64 BALANCE -2 CITY BUSES 14.00 SANQUIST 03 MEMBERSHI 50.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- 110946 110947 110948 110949 110949 110950 110951 110951 110951 110952 110952 110953 110954 110955 110956 110957 110958 110959 110960 110961 110961 110961 110962 110963 110963 110963 110964 M0965 0966 0966 1r.J 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 TOTAL CHECK 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 TOTAL CHECK 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 TOTAL CHECK 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 TOTAL CHECK 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 TOTAL CHECK 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1101 10/30/02 1167 D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED 9244 02/03 WINTER CAMP SHI 2494 DEGUARDI, JONATHON Q. 9001 9 /3COMPENSATION MTG 1181 DICECCO, MARK 9001 9 /9COMPENSATION MTG 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9301 BLACK TRAFFIC PAINT 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9310 PW COLD PATCH 3336 DUARTE, DENISE 3862 REFUND- WOMEN'S BSKTBL 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9230 WILLIAMS -CA JPIA 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9231 TRAFFENSTEDT TO BW &S 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9230 BURNS -COMP HOUSING SR 2634 FETCHET, ERIC 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 2634 FETCHET, ERIC 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 2871 FINE FOODS BY JULIE 9244 12/20 SR CTR EVENT DE 1227 FLAME, JACOB 9160 KARATE INSTRUCTION 2862 G.I. RUBBISH 9252 10 /02MO13ILEHM TRASH S 3123 GALITZ, DEPUTY PHIL 9225 11/22 -26 SEM PER DIEM 3337 GEOLABS 9640 COMPACTION TESTS 2901 GONZALES, BRYAN 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 3320 GREENAWAY, COLLEEN 3301 REFUND -CIT #164799 1258 HALLER, PAUL 9001 9 /9COMPENSATION MTG 1259 HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE 9244 TRICK /TREAT VILLAGE 1259 HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE 9244 BREAKFAST W/ SANTA 1259 HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE 9244 VISIT FROM SANTA 3271 HAVLE, NEIL 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9244 6FT U -POSTS 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 AVCP FENCE REPAIR 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9204 FACILITIES -DRAIN PIPE 1289 HUGG, JOHN A 9160 GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9211 11 /02FAX RENTAL 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9251 #46 REWIRE TRAILER PL 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 #5 REPAIR WIRING TRAI PAGE NUMBER: 3 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 AMOUNT 312.10 100.00 100.00 35.66 204.85 240.51 39.00 7.38 15.22 11.28 33.88 40.00 20.00 60.00 200.00 132.00 382.82 250.00 660.00 20.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 35.00 100.00 235.00 20.00 115.72 162.68 73.59 351.99 809.01 64.35 34.25 102.75 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING #2 REPAIR REAR AXLE S 136.75 TRK #4 BATTERY REPAIRS DATE: 10/30/02 569.27 PARKS FUEL CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 PW OFF RD RED DIESEL 11.11 CHECK REGISTER 11 /8TEEN DANCE ATTRAC FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 113.22 SHEA HOMES ADMIN FEE 16.98 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 110966 1101 10/30/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 110966 1101 10/30/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 110966 1101 10/30/02 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 10 /16LEADERSHIP CONFE TOTAL CHECK 139.00 189.00 110967 1101 10/30/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9205 110967 1101 10/30/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9255 110967 1101 10/30/02 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9255 TEEN WRISTBANDS FOR DANCE TOTAL CHECK 246.96 GLOW NECKLACES FOR TEEN D -89.72 110968 1101 10/30/02 1312 JOLLY JUMPS INC 9244 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & 13ERKMAN I 2754 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2754 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 9102 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 110969 1101 10/30/02 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2754 TOTAL CHECK 110970 1101 10/30/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 110970 1101 10/30/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 TOTAL CHECK 110971 1101 10/30/02 1323 KUENY, STEVEN 9223 110971 1101 10/30/02 1323 KUENY, STEVEN 9225 TOTAL CHECK 110972 1101 10/30/02 1329 LANDIS, KIPP A 9001 110973 1101 10/30/02 3280 LAWRENCE, KEITH 9244 110974 1101 10/30/02 3325 LAWTON, JACK 3301 110975 1101 10/30/02 1333 LBL EQUIPMENT REPAIR INC 9254 110975 1101 10/30/02 1333 LBL EQUIPMENT REPAIR INC 9204 110975 1101 10/30/02 1333 LBL EQUIPMENT REPAIR INC 9251 TOTAL CHECK 110976 1101 10/30/02 3144 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER 9205 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 110977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 10977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 130977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 �1➢j0977 1101 10/30/02 2560 LIQUID LIGHT 9244 rn TOTAL CHECK ippw; i 4wd PAGE NUMBER: 4 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT #15 TRAILER PLUG 68.50 #2 REPAIR REAR AXLE S 136.75 TRK #4 BATTERY REPAIRS 227.02 569.27 PARKS FUEL 32.47 PRKS FUEL 13.98 PW OFF RD RED DIESEL 11.11 57.56 11 /8TEEN DANCE ATTRAC 395.00 9 /02SHEA HOMES LEGAL 113.22 SHEA HOMES ADMIN FEE 16.98 9 /02MTNVIEW LEGAL 54.00 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 36.00 MTNVIEW ADMIN REVENUE -8.10 MTNVIEW ADMIN FEE 8.10 SHEA HOMES ADMIN FEE 21.60 SHEA HOMES ADMIN REVE -16.98 SHEA HOMES ADMIN REVE -21.60 9 /02SHEA HOMES LEGAL 144.00 347.22 10 /02PW BLDG JANITORI 180.00 AVRC CARPET CLEANING 75.00 255.00 10 /16LEADERSHIP CONFE 50.00 ADV EMP ISSUES PER DI 139.00 189.00 9 /9COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 REFUND -CIT #164533 50.00 #5 HYDRAULIC LIFT 689.84 TRACTOR TIRE REPLACED 101.13 PW HYDRAULIC FLUID 40.65 831.62 PLANNING COM DOC BIND 152.05 TEEN WRISTBANDS FOR DANCE - 162.15 TEEN WRISTBANDS FOR DANCE 133.40 TEEN WRISTBANDS FOR DANCE 246.96 GLOW NECKLACES FOR TEEN D -89.72 FREIGHT FOR TEEN SUPPLIES 17.79 GLOW NECKLACES FOR TEEN D 136.65 GLOW NECKLACES FOR TEEN D 73.81 FREIGHT FOR TEEN SUPPLIES 32.93 FREIGHT FOR TEEN SUPPLIES -21.62 368.05 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 9 /02COM FAC WATER 146.10 9 /02ANNEX WATER DATE: 10/30/02 10 /02PW BLDG WATER 38.16 10 /02COM FAC WATER CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 9 /02AVRC WATER 23.90 10 /02AVRC WATER CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 106.01 9 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 12.24 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR - - - - -- ACCT 110978 1101 10/30/02 3348 M. LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS 9223 110979 1101 10/30/02 1354 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDEN 9222 110980 1101 10/30/02 3340 MAP 9223 110981 1101 10/30/02 3107 MARSHALL ARTS FOR KIDS 9160 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 110982 1101 10/30/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 TOTAL CHECK 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 110983 1101 10/30/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 TOTAL CHECK 110984 1101 10/30/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 110984 1101 10/30/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 TOTAL CHECK 110985 1101 10/30/02 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9240 110986 1101 10/30/02 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY 9204 110987 1101 10/30/02 1388 MOORPARK FLOWER EMPORIUM 9241 110988 1101 10/30/02 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 110989 1101 10/30/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9208 110989 1101 10/30/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9204 TOTAL CHECK 110990 1101 10/30/02 1424 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 9103 110990 1101 10/30/02 1424 ORKIN EXTERMINATING 9102 TOTAL CHECK 110991 1101 10/30/02 1425 OTTO, JR. WILLIAM F. 9001 110992 1101 10/30/02 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 110993 1101 10/30/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 (t10994 1101 10/30/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9350 410995 1101 10/30/02 3349 PADILLA, LISA 9160 C4 7- PAGE NUMBER: 5 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT ADVANCED EMP ISSUES 549.00 CUST SVC WKSHOP -3EMPL 30.00 10 /16CITY MGR CONFERE 50.00 YOUTH SAFETY INSTRUCT 122.40 9 /02PW BLDG WATER 23.90 9 /02COM FAC WATER 146.10 9 /02ANNEX WATER 44.75 10 /02PW BLDG WATER 38.16 10 /02COM FAC WATER 189.99 10 /02ANNEX WATER 31.52 9 /02AVRC WATER 23.90 10 /02AVRC WATER 51.70 550.02 9 /02MPK PD FUEL 106.01 9 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 12.24 9 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL 21.50 9 /02PW STREETS FUEL 12.24 9 /02PARKS FUEL 62.65 9 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL 21.50 236.14 10 /16- 11 /12STORAGE RN 137.28 10 /11- 11 /7SKATERAMP 72.40 209.68 20TH ANNIV LAYOUT,DES 137.45 VECTOR LAY MASH 9.35 GILBERT ARRANGEMENT 49.82 #2 BATTERY CABLE 8.53 PARKS TOOLS 20.00 PARKS OPERATING SUPPL 76.76 96.76 9 /02AVRC PEST CONTROL 176.55 9 /02CH PEST CONTROL 188.32 364.87 9 /9COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 HUTCHINSON SAFETY BOO 145.86 10/02 T -1 PHONE LINE 180.94 10 /02STATE RTE SWEEPI 561.33 REFUND -YOUTH SAFETY C 24.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/30/02 PAGE NUMBER: 6 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:34:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 110996 1101 10/30/02 1835 PAREDES, RESERVE DEPUTY J 9119 5HRS SECURITY 100.80 110997 1101 10/30/02 1434 PARK LANE CAR WASH INC 9255 PARKS TRUCK #28 FUEL 14.80 110997 1101 10/30/02 1434 PARK LANE CAR WASH INC 9254 PRKS TRUCK28 CAR WASH 9.95 TOTAL CHECK 24.75 110998 1101 10/30/02 1436 PARVIN, JANICE 9001 9 /9COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 110999 1101 10/30/02 1856 PERPETUAL STORAGE 9102 STORAGE & BACK UP TAP 85.50 111000 1101 10/30/02 1444 PFLAUMER, THOMAS E. 9001 9 /3COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 111001 1101 10/30/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 10 /2CC MTG PACKETS 347.12 111001 1101 10/30/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 MPK ENVELOPES W /ADDRE 181.25 111001 1101 10/30/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 NOTICE OF HEARING ENV 265.98 111001 1101 10/30/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 PORTER BUSINESS CARDS 101.89 TOTAL CHECK 896.24 111002 1101 10/30/02 3309 PRO SOUND & STAGE LIGHTIN 9245 50 WATT LAMP 64.34 111002 1101 10/30/02 3309 PRO SOUND & STAGE LIGHTIN 9245 ECONOMY LIGHT STANDS 150.23 111002 1101 10/30/02 3309 PRO SOUND & STAGE LIGHTIN 9245 MINI -PAR SPOTLIGHT 85.83 111002 1101 10/30/02 3309 PRO SOUND & STAGE LIGHTIN 9245 SPOTLIGHT FREIGHT 17.12 TOTAL CHECK 317.52 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 23.50 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.52 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 23.51 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 23.51 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.52 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.52 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 34.32 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 34.88 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 18.11 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPP 18.11 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 25.87 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 25.87 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 22.95 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 22.96 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 22.95 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 25.87 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPP 34.32 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 16.69 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 16.69 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.28 111003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.28 1003 1101 10/30/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 11003 1101 TOTAL 10/30/02 CHECK 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 752.64 K1004 1101 10/30/02 1473 R.P. BARRICADE 9240 BARRICADE DEL &PICKUP 20.00 1004 P" 1101 10/30/02 1473 R.P. BARRICADE 9240 BARRICADES FOR COUNTRY DA 150.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:34:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 170.00 111005 1101 10/30/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 MPK PD SUPPLIES 47.09 111005 1101 10/30/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9222 AVRC SUPPLIES 14.51 111005 1101 10/30/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 AVRC FILM PROCESSING 12.21 TOTAL CHECK 73.81 111006 1101 10/30/02 1907 SCMAF 9223 10 /10HALL,HARTNETT 90.00 111007 1101 10/30/02 2656 SHARPE, SEAN 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUE 41.48 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 6.18 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02AVRC FUEL 16.59 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02CEO FUEL 41.96 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02VECTOR FUEL 59.34 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02PARKS FUEL 163.01 111008 1101 10/30/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 8 /02PW STREETS FUEL 6.18 TOTAL CHECK 334.74 111009 1101 10/30/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 9 /13BATTERY -TR TO MPK 714.21 111010 1101 10/30/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9205 AVCP RR KEYS 50.19 111010 1101 10/30/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9103 ANNEX ENTRY GATE REPR 85.00 TOTAL CHECK 135.19 111011 1101 10/30/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR HOSPITALITY SU 68.46 111011 1101 10/30/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR HOSPITALITY SU 55.40 TOTAL CHECK 123.86 111012 1101 10/30/02 3347 SMITH, RANDALL SCOTT 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 111013 1101 10/30/02 3331 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPT 9222 11/6 9TH ANNUAL CONFE 80.00 111014 1101 10/30/02 1552 STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL 9201 XEROX TONER 213.43 111015 1101 10/30/02 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102 9 /02DATA LINE SRVCS 133.50 111016 1101 10/30/02 3105 SWING, JAMES ROBERT 9160 GUITAR INSTRUCTION 120.00 111017 1101 10/30/02 1658 TARGET 9204 RECREATION OP SUPPLIE 176.67 111018 1101 10/30/02 1566 TELCOM INC 9208 PW RADIO BATTERIES 193.05 111019 1101 10/30/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 9/01 6479 PENN ST 25.33 111019 1101 10/30/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 9 /02AVRC GAS 36.91 111019 1101 10/30/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 9 /02PW BLDG GAS 1.07 111019 1101 10/30/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 9 /02FACILITIES GAS 62.39 TOTAL CHECK 125.70 ,1020 1101 10/30/02 1574 THOMPSON, SANDRA G 9001 9 /3COMPENSATION MTG 100.00 //a °"1021 1101 10/30/02 1575 THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY 9102 9 /02TAXI SRVCS-21 TRI 162.20 �ll WA1022 1101 10/30/02 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 00 KAWASAKI SRVC 181.14 3,11022 1101 10/30/02 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 00 KAWASAKI SRVC 240.54 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PW KRYSTALKOTE KIT 58.63 DATE: 10/30/02 SFTBALL /BSKTBL AWARDS 187.69 8 /02PARKS FUEL CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 8 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL 21.54 8 /02VECTOR FUEL CHECK REGISTER 8 /02PW STREETS FUEL FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 8 /02TRAFFIC ENF FUEL 32.32 8 /02RECREATION FUEL CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS TOTAL CHECK 61.50 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 84.00 111023 1101 10/30/02 3339 TRADEWINDS INTERNATIONAL, 9208 111023 1101 10/30/02 3339 TRADEWINDS INTERNATIONAL, 9303 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS TOTAL CHECK 6.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 6.00 111024 1101 10/30/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 111025 1101 10/30/02 1600 UNION 76 9255 TOTAL CHECK 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 111026 1101 10/30/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 TOTAL CHECK 111027 1101 10/30/02 1160 VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR 9212 111027 1101 10/30/02 1160 VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR 9212 TOTAL CHECK 111028 1101 10/30/02 1162 VENTURA COUNTY SOLID WAST 9205 111029 1101 10/30/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9220 111030 1101 10/30/02 3343 VESTUTO, ANGELITA D. 9160 111031 1101 10/30/02 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9204 111031 1101 10/30/02 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9252 TOTAL CHECK 111032 1101 10/30/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9301 111032 1101 10/30/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 111032 1101 10/30/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9301 X11032 `Fp 1101 10/30/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 111032 1101 10/30/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9204 <w TOTAL CHECK C) "i11033 t 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 PAGE NUMBER: 8 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 - DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 421.68 PW SPRAY GUN 219.50 PW KRYSTALKOTE KIT 58.63 278.13 SFTBALL /BSKTBL AWARDS 187.69 8 /02PARKS FUEL 319.89 8 /02MPK PD FUEL 13.89 8 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL 21.54 8 /02VECTOR FUEL 53.84 8 /02PW STREETS FUEL 342.28 8 /02TRAFFIC ENF FUEL 32.32 8 /02RECREATION FUEL 126.54 8/02AD842 FUEL 13.79 924.09 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 27.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 61.50 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 84.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 123.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 13.50 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 3.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 6.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 3.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 21.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 42.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 6.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 6.00 7 /02REPEATER ACCESS 12.00 8 /02REPEATER ACCESS 42.00 450.00 10 /02VECTOR WALNUT LE 320.65 11 /02VECTOR LEASE 320.65 641.30 11/20 LIVING HERE AD 109.52 C MGR 52 WEEK SUBSCRI 169.00 TENNIS INSTRUCTOR 165.00 CRDT INCORRECT FREIGH -44.86 AVCP TENNIS CT PARTS 177.16 132.30 PAINT & PAINTING SUPP 38.48 VECTOR OPERATING SUPP 46.90 PW PAINT ROLLERS 9.08 MPK PD SUPPLIES 5.35 AVRC BLDG MAINT 46.04 145.85 6/17- 7 /17COPY ROOM CO 104.14 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:34:46 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 6 /17- 7 /17POSTAGE AREA 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 8 /17- 9 /17POSTAGE AREA 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 6/17- 7 /17ANNEX COPIES 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 PW BLDG TONER 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 PW BLDG TONER 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 8/17- 9 /17COPY ROOM AR 111033 1101 10/30/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 8/17- 9 /17ANNEX COPIES TOTAL CHECK 111034 1101 10/30/02 3341 YUAN, CINDY 3862 REFUND -BEG SALSA 111035 1101 10/30/02 2978 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CO. 9244 AVRC 100 ICE PACKS 111036 1101 10/30/02 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 CROSSROAD SYMBOLS,PED 111036 1101 10/30/02 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 POLICE SIGNS TOTAL CHECK TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT �1 1 �L PAGE NUMBER: 9 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 AMOUNT 208.91 259.73 100.86 5.90 5.90 169.19 94.58 949.21 50.00 134.06 181.95 118.51 300.46 29,896.78 29,896.78 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:34:50 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/02 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 3,168.06 1000 GENERAL FUND 16,098.01 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 323.72 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 195.66 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,343.10 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 55.27 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1,648.33 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 660.00 2605 GAS TAX 4,703.06 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 594.10 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 454.85 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 185.20 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 109.52 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 295.80 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 62.10 TOTAL REPORT 29,896.78 �v #ar`, }y 3 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 16:07:25 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9/02H RILEY CELLPHONE 67.93 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02TRAFFENSTEDT CELL 13.15 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 9/02C MGR NEW CEELPHO 154.56 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02KUENY CELLPHONE 46.77 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02HUNTER CELLPHONE 75.57 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02MPK PD CELLPHONES 546.85 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02MORGENSTERN CELLP 54.03 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02WALTER CELLPHONE 32.87 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02JOHNSTON CELLPHON 30.33 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9/02M RILEY CELLPHONE 13.46 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02GIL13ERT CELLPHONE 19.47 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02HOGAN CELLPHONE 29.52 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02AVRC CELLPHONE 14.90 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02LINDLEY CELLPHONE 40.40 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02CHUDOBA CELLPHONE 13.15 111037 1101 11/06/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9/02C MGR TEMP USE 20.78 TOTAL CHECK 1,173.74 111038 1101 11/06/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 10 /11 720.00 111039 1101 11/06/02 3062 ADVANCED BORING SPECIALIS 2601 REFUND- RENTAL DEPOSIT 3,838.00 111040 1101 11/06/02 2657 AL'S LEATHER 9205 MPK PD JACKETS 1,008.15 111041 1101 11/06/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 2734 NORTH PRK ADMIN FEE 1,214.63 111041 1101 11/06/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 2755 9 /02NORTH PRK VILLAGE 8,097.50 111041 1101 11/06/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 3806 NORTH PRK ADMIN REVEN - 1,214.63 TOTAL CHECK 8,097.50 111042 1101 11/06/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 LA AVE WIDENING PROJ 8,297.90 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0151- 8 /02PARDEE -4.34 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 8/02 MISSION BELL PLA 1,500.00 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359- 0145- 8 /02MISSIO 242.58 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0151- 8 /02PARDEE 28.91 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0151- 8 /02COM DE -51.53 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0151- 8 /02COM DE 1.45 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0151- 8 /02COM DE 2.90 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359 - 0100- 8 /02ADMIN 174.15 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0102- 8 /02COM DE 48.39 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359 - 0001- 8 /02RETAIN 1.24 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0103- 8 /02COMM S 162.00 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0102- 8 /02COM DE 125.80 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359 - 0145- 8 /02MISSIO 5,541.61 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359 - 0102- 8 /02COM DE 9.67 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0102- 8 /02COM DE 19.35 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0144- 8 /02VALENZ .45 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0105- 8 /02PW 35.02 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359 - 0001- 8 /02RETAIN 7.06 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359 - 0151- 8 /02COM DE 18.87 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 8 /02RETAIN 743.41 411043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536- 0145- 8 /02MORALE 272.00 _b11043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536 - 0143- 8 /02WHITAK 1,006.45 11043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536 - 0001- 8 /02GENERA 950.40 a.11043 C- 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0102- 8 /02COM DE 140.31 rI11043 �xe`, 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0099- 8 /02CRA 142.73 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 16:07:25 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - - -- VENDOR- - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0102- 8 /02COM DE 7.26 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536 - 0144- 8 /02RUIZ 5.48 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 8 /02RETAIN 131.19 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359 - 0102- 8 /02COM DE 21.05 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 0151- 8 /02PARDEE 4.34 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0105- 8 /02PW 12.74 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0105- 8 /02PW 101.98 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0102- 8 /02COM DE 43.54 111043 1101 11/06/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0144- 8 /02VALENZ 35.25 TOTAL CHECK 11,481.71 111044 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 9 /02CITY ENG 347.63 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 9 /02TRAFFIC EN 219.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 9 /02CITY ENG 2,085.74 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.131- 9 /02ARMET DAVI 41.75 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 9 /02CITY ENG 347.63 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 92.160- 9 /02WILLIAM LY 107.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.260- 9 /02PENFIELD S 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.280- 9/02TR3963 -2 L 151.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.140- 9 /02RAMPS AT T 2,652.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.290- 9 /02IACOBELLIS 161.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.051- 9 /02LYON HOMES 10,500.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.310- 9 /02SKYVIEW EN 95.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.132- 9 /02ARMET DAVI 765.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.133- 9 /02ARMET DAVI 900.75 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.306- 9 /02USA PROPER 116.56 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 9 /02ADELPHIA 500.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.180 -9/02D IWANSKI 51.10 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.131- 9 /02JAIME ANAY 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.055- 9 /02PEACH HILL 361.67 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.328- 9 /02LENNAR HOM 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.307- 9 /02LENNAR HOM 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.035- 9 /02KAUFMAN 150.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.310- 9 /02USA PROPER 386.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.370- 9 /02MORRISON 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.336- 9 /02LENNAR HOM 683.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.323- 9 /02LENNAR HOM 10,476.54 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.324- 9 /02LENNAR HOM 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.018- 9 /02STEVE HARR 10.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.019 -9/02F GUERRERO 132.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003- 9 /02ENCROACHME 569.80 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 9 /02KAUFMAN & 226.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.421- 9 /02PCH HILL /M 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.030 -9/02 YR 02 OVE 8,545.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 9 /02MILLER PRK 431.00 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.013- 9 /02RBF RESEAR 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9143 9 /02PLAN -CHECK RESIDE 13,125.52 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 11/02 LOAN PAYMENT - 12,366.67 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 9 /02TRAFFIC EN 219.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 9 /02CYPRESS LA 1,474.25 M1045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.373- 9 /02MORRISON 19.50 1r�1045 1101 1101 11/06/02 11/06/02 1120 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT CHARLES ASSOCIATES 2711 90.164- 9 /02TOLL BROS 9 /02TOTAL 269.44 (_-1045 ".11045 1101 11/06/02 1120 ABBOTT CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES 2106 2711 BILLABLE FE 88.236- 9 /02CABRILLO - 75,785.00 1,038.67 �b; PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 16:07:25 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.021 -9/02 6717 ASPE 405.75 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.305- 9 /02USA PROPER 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.200- 9 /02RJR ENGINE 131.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.241 -9/02D MOOREHEA 838.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.501- 9 /02SHARMA IPD 197.25 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402- 9 /02CARD SRVCS 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.102- 9 /02RON WIDINE 309.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.305- 9 /02USA PROPER 89.14 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.220- 9 /02NORTH PRK 19.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.043- 9/02TR5130 820.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9144 9 /02PLAN -CHECK NON RE 2,157.55 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9147 9 /02NON- RESIDENT PERM 14,247.81 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.237- 9 /02CABRILLO 1,022.90 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 9 /02LA AVE EAS 90.98 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9146 9 /02RESIDENT PERMITS 46,254.12 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 9 /02TOTAL AMOUNT DUES 48,130.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.307- 9 /02USA PROPER 2,168.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.073- 9 /02ACCESS RD 248.75 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.030 -9/02 02 OVERLA 7.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.339- 9 /02ZELMAN DEV 7,676.50 111045 1101 11/06/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.300- 9 /02CALLEGUAS 387.25 TOTAL CHECK 94,410.38 111046 1101 11/06/02 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 8 /02CITATIONS -475 523.90 111046 1101 11/06/02 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 7 /02CITATIONS -304 458.20 111046 1101 11/06/02 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 9 /02CITATIONS -300 427.20 TOTAL CHECK 1,409.30 111047 1101 11/06/02 1136 COACH USA 9102 9 /02MPK BUS MAINT 18,041.20 111048 1101 11/06/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 ADOBE PHOTOSHOP 642.43 111048 1101 11/06/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 XEROX CARTRIDGES 597.38 111048 1101 11/06/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 CITY HALL COMP MICE 122.26 111048 1101 11/06/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9504 GIS COMPUTER & MONITO 1,116.47 111048 1101 11/06/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 COMPUTERS & MONTIORS 2,232.95 TOTAL CHECK 4,711.49 111049 1101 11/06/02 1167 D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED 9244 JR BSKTBL T- SHIRTS 1,056.20 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.25 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.22 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES -37.98 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.18 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPL 144.73 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAER SUPPLI 144.73 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL 9.49 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 196.74 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL 7.55 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPL 28.95 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL 18.98 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.65 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SLD WST OFFICE SUPPLI 10.84 11050 1050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SLD WST OFFICE SUPPLI 18.75 C''1050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 121.42 62 1.1050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 218.52 1050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C CLERK OFFICE SUPPLI 70.74 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 21.36 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.53 DATE: 10/30/02 140.77 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 16:07:25 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 158.56 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI CHECK REGISTER COMM DEV OFFICE CHAIR FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND PUB WORKS OFFICE SUPP 30.53 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPL CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR- - - - - -- ACCT 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9201 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 111050 1101 11/06/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 TOTAL CHECK 111051 1101 11/06/02 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9171 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9202 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 111052 1101 11/06/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 TOTAL CHECK 111053 1101 11/06/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 111053 1101 11/06/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 TOTAL CHECK 111054 1101 11/06/02 2232 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC 9504 111055 1101 11/06/02 3144 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER 9205 111056 1101 11/06/02 2576 MOORPARK SYMPHONY ORCHEST 9103 111057 1101 11/06/02 2530 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN 9103 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 }� 058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1t11058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 §,µO58 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 (11058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 11058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 ,tea PAGE NUMBER: 4 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT REDEVELOP OFFICE SUPP 21.35 REDEVELOP OFFICE SUPP 21.36 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.53 AVRC SHEETING 140.77 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL 185.97 TONER /COMPUTER SUUPLI 9.44 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 158.56 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 20.29 COMM DEV OFFICE CHAIR 513.78 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPL 10.71 PUB WORKS OFFICE SUPP 30.53 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPL 81.53 AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 49.06 C MGR OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.27 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 15.51 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.58 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 75.92 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPP 167.25 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPP 15.96 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLI 19.11 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPP 149.52 2,801.76 LA AVE /BELTRAMO RD 4,395.00 LEAGUE OF CA- ASSISTCC 175.00 CJPIA- TRAFFENS CONFER 245.00 8 /02TEEN TRIPS 1,580.96 DAYTIMERS -03 CALENDAR 49.31 8 /02EZ2 INTERNET 45.00 LEAGUE OF CA -ADMIN DI 175.00 MPK CHAMBER MTG -HUGH 10.00 IBILCS.COM- INTERNET 29.95 2,310.22 10 /02AVRC JANITORIAL 960.00 10 /02SR CTR JANITORIA 589.00 1,549.00 MPK PD LASER /RADAR 2,523.58 PLANNING -DOC BINDERS 1,698.34 ORCHESTRA PERFORMANCE 5,000.00 9 /02GRAVES ACCT SRVCS 11,887.50 9 /02MILLER PRK PAYPHO 59.74 9 /02GLENWOOD PRK PAYP 59.74 9/02C MGR PHONE 10.28 9 /02CITYWIDE PHONE 851.31 9 /02POINDEXTER PRK PA 59.74 9 /02FINANCE PHONE 10.28 9/02C CLERK PHONE 10.28 9 /02EMERGENCY MGT 167.38 9 /02COMM CTR PAYPHONE 53.91 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 9 /02VECTOR PHONE 25.34 9 /02CAMPUS PRK PAYPHO DATE: 10/30/02 9 /02CMPS CYN PRK PAYP 59.74 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 16:07:25 .42 8 /02FINANCE LONG DIST 14.87 CHECK REGISTER 44.34 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 60.25 8 /02ST MAINT LONG DIS 45.56 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------------- VENDOR -------------- ACCT 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 111058 1101 11/06/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 7,292.84 TOTAL CHECK 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 111059 1101 11/06/02 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 TOTAL CHECK 111060 1101 11/06/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 111060 1101 11/06/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 TOTAL CHECK 111061 1101 11/06/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 111061 1101 11/06/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9352 111061 1101 11/06/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 TOTAL CHECK 111062 1101 11/06/02 3021 PROGRAMMERS, INC. 9103 111063 1101 11/06/02 3200 ROLLINS CONSULTING, INC. 9103 111064 1101 11/06/02 2820 SCE 9413 111065 1101 11/06/02 1501 SECURITY ABOVE 9102 111066 1101 11/06/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 111066 1101 11/06/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 111066 1101 11/06/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 111066 1101 11/06/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 TOTAL CHECK 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 1 67 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 1 1067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 1 67 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 1l`l067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 1Q-g67 i 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 r -. PAGE NUMBER: 5 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 9 /02VECTOR PHONE 25.34 9 /02CAMPUS PRK PAYPHO 59.74 9 /02CMPS CYN PRK PAYP 59.74 1,427.48 8/02C CLERK LONG DIST .42 8 /02FINANCE LONG DIST 14.87 8 /02COMM SRVC LONG DI 44.34 8 /02SR CTR LONG DISTA 14.89 8 /02AVRC LONG DISTANC 60.25 8 /02ST MAINT LONG DIS 45.56 8 /02C MGR LONG DISTAN 22.95 8 /02MRA /ECO LONG DIST 1.32 8 /02CH LONG DISTANCE 665.47 8 /02C COUNCIL LONG DI 5.27 8/14- 9 /12MTN MEADOWS 875.34 7 -9/02 SRVCS 540.00 8/02 HIGH ST SRVCS 3,135.00 8 /14- 9 /12VECTOR 3,675.00 10 /02TR MED SWEEPING 30.56 9 /02METROLINK SWEEPIN 550.75 10 /02CITY RTE SWEEPIN 6,711.53 7,292.84 2ND PYMT -DETTS DEVELO 6,300.00 9 /02BETANCOURT PROJ 1,209.00 11 /02PREV NOT BILLED 1,551.79 9 /02METROLINK GUARD 2,066.40 9 /02INTERSECTION REPA 593.91 9 /02INSURANCE ADJ 72.15 9 /02INTERSECTION MAIN 1,333.50 MILLER & TR DAMAGE RE 11,528.48 13,528.04 8 /14- 9 /12GRIFFIN PARK 73.68 8/14- 9 /12COMM CTR 2,517.88 8 /14- 9 /12REDEVELOPMEN 16.91 8/14- 9 /12PCH HILL 1,673.39 8 /14- 9 /12PRKWYS & MED 117.29 8 /14- 9 /12CITY HALL 2,180.13 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 2 45.90 8 /14- 9 /12CAMPUS CANYO 35.30 8/14- 9 /12TIERRA REJAD 141.43 8/14- 9 /12PCH HILL PRK 721.59 8/14- 9 /12MTN MEADOWS 234.15 8/14- 9 /12ST MAINT 109.90 8/14- 9 /12VILLA CAMPES 101.08 8 /14- 9 /12VECTOR 76.60 8/14- 9 /12MPK MOBILEHO 287.99 8 /14- 9 /12VIRGINIA COL 11.02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 16:07:25 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12CNTRY TRAIL 13.82 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12AV PRK 2,986.57 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12GLENWOOD 42.96 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12CAMPUS PARK 24.50 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12ZONE 11 13.82 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 8 /14- 9 /12CITY LIMITS 19,539.77 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12ZONE 12 217.12 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 6 12.96 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12ZONE 5 14.38 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 8 /14- 9 /12TRAFFIC SIGN 1,264.95 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12ZONE 10 127.55 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8 /14- 9 /12ZONE 9 1.94 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 8 /14- 9 /12METROLINK 154.66 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 8 /14- 9 /12SCHOOL PROPE 7.46 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 1 20.20 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 4 13.92 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 7 40.60 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9 /12ZONE 8 52.31 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14 -9/12 798 MPK AVE 156.63 111067 1101 11/06/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 8/14- 9/12AV COMM CTR 2,003.67 TOTAL CHECK 35,054.03 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z2 SPRING,CHR BA 2,823.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z5 PCH HILL TO T 1,149.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z4 WMS RCH PRKWY 268.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 IRRIGATION VANDALISM 879.85 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 10/02 18 HIGH ST 68.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 SPRING RD & HIGH ST 1,830.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 10/02 661 MPK AVE 42.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02METROLINK STATIO 299.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02 798 MPK AVE 80.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02CIVIC /COMM CTR 525.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02CAMPUS PRK 803.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02AV PRK & PED BRI 5,612.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02COMM CTR PRK 194.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02MTN MEADOWS COMM 7,824.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02VILLA CAMPESINA 284.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02GLENWOOD PRK 1,018.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02CNTRY TRAIL PRK 1,680.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02CAMPUS CYN PRK 2,520.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02GRIFFIN PRK 1,208.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02PCH HILL PRK 2,520.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02MONTE VISTA PRK 326.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02VIRGINIA COL PRK 315.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02POINDEXTER PRK 735.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02PRKWYS & MEDIANS 5,631.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z6 GLENHAVEN 49.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/0228 MPK BUS CTR 53.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02Z1 PECAN,BAMBI,B 84.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02MILLER PRK 735.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02COLMER ALYSSAS 32.00 111068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z7 MPK SQ IND PK 420.00 OT,l068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02Z8HOME ACRES BUF 315.00 " 1068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02TIERRA REJADA PR 2,520.00 1068 F 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10 /02MTN MEADOWS PRK 2,468.00 "1068 1101 11/06/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 10/02Z3 PEPRML,BTR CR 137.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 8 /24PUB HEARING -USA 110.11 8 /9PUB HEARING -TOLL B 148.33 DATE: 10/30/02 163.86 8 /9PUB HEARING -USA PR 122.43 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 16:07:25 105.49 8 /29PUB NOTICE -DBE 10 58.52 CHECK REGISTER 1,090.07 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 1,280.94 7 /31- 10 /2PRKWYS & MED 3,258.01 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 1 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 7/31- 10 /2AVRC & GYM TOTAL CHECK 2,264.85 7/17- 9 /17ZONE 12 12,570.53 7 /17- 9 /17PRKWYS & MED 111069 1101 11/06/02 2289 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE /ASCOM 9231 111070 1101 11/06/02 2283 VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 111071 1101 11/06/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 TOTAL CHECK 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 111072 1101 11/06/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 TOTAL CHECK 111073 1101 11/06/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 111073 1101 11/06/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 TOTAL CHECK 111074 1101 11/06/02 3350 WILSHIRE BUILDERS 2799 111075 1101 11/06/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 111075 1101 11/06/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 111075 1101 11/06/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 111075 1101 11/06/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 111075 1101 11/06/02 2843 WOLCO 9203 TOTAL CHECK rc TOTAL FUND PAGE NUMBER: 7 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 45,446.85 CITY HALL POSTAGE MTR 3,000.00 10/02 Z12 LANDSCAPE 3,778.50 8 /4PUB HEARING -CDBG 99.33 8 /24PUB HEARING -USA 110.11 8 /9PUB HEARING -TOLL B 148.33 8 /31PUB HEAR- ZONING 163.86 8 /9PUB HEARING -USA PR 122.43 8 /9PUB HEAR- ZONING OR 282.00 8 /9PUB HEARING - ASADUR 105.49 8 /29PUB NOTICE -DBE 10 58.52 1,090.07 7 /17- 9 /17MILLER PRK 5,329.46 7/31- 10 /2COMM CTR 1,280.94 7 /31- 10 /2PRKWYS & MED 3,258.01 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 1 122.31 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 10 14,789.87 7 /31- 10 /2MTN MEADOWS 3,290.01 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 5 1,173.61 7/31- 10 /2AVRC & GYM 519.83 7/17- 9 /17ZONE 2 2,264.85 7/17- 9 /17ZONE 12 12,570.53 7 /17- 9 /17PRKWYS & MED 4,155.36 7/17- 9 /17PCH HILL PRK 4,041.69 7/17- 9 /17ZONE 5 1,305.56 7 /17- 9 /17MONTE VISTA 153.95 7/17- 9 /17ZONE 6 41.28 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 8 615.22 7 /31- 10 /2COUNTRY TRAI 4,700.53 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 4 133.92 7 /31- 10 /2GRIFFIN PRK 2,165.27 7 /31- 10 /2CAMPUS CYN 2,960.73 7 /31- 10 /2CAMPUS PRK 1,688.96 7 /31- 10 /2TIERRA REJAD 1,878.54 7 /31- 10 /2ZONE 11 61.31 68,501.74 9 /02CONTRACT VIDEO PR 2,250.00 9 /02GPAPHIC SRV /BBS 672.00 2,922.00 REIMBURSE -CASH BOND 25,703.37 8/19 -9/19 798 MPK AVE 9/17- 10 /17ANNEX COPIE 9 /17- 10 /17COPY AREA 675 MPK AVE MAINTENAN 9 /17- 10 /17POSTAGE ARE 79.65 91.94 46.30 120.00 132.42 470.31 410,303.73 0 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 16:07:25 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT TOTAL REPORT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- PAGE NUMBER: 8 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 AMOUNT 410,303.73 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 16:07:57 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 9,905.59 1000 GENERAL FUND 39,448.83 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 450.50 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 62,660.88 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 33,588.74 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 226.51 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 5,133.75 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 137.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 415.84 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 3,642.55 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 103.24 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 460.60 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 982.53 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 54.94 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 22,741.42 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 107.13 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 16,566.15 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 55,936.43 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 12,783.88 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. - 12,366.67 2603 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A 11,205.25 2605 GAS TAX 22,054.80 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 2,523.58 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 99.33 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 5,171.99 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER 14,550.46 4003 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN 2,232.95 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 21,112.01 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 29.59 6015 SUNCAL 820.50 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 10,500.00 6140 BURGER KING 1,708.00 6193 CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR 19.50 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 376.50 6318 CALLEGUAS 387.25 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 2,061.57 6360 ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL 266.85 6375 PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W 26,065.04 6385 RICHMOND AM H 10,515.54 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI 417.77 6407 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING 683.50 6431 CARDSERVICE 19.50 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 1,474.25 6460 PERFORMANCE NURSERY /SCE 248.75 6480 M &M DEVELOPMENT 838.25 6494 O'NEAL COMMUNICATIONS 22.25 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 7,821.17 6515 USA PROPERTIES 3,023.61 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 9,331.63 6541 SHARMA GENERAL 197.25 6548 PARDEE CONSTRUCTION 72.25 6566 RJR ENGINEERING 131.50 6594 MELISSA L BARON 55.65 �. 6908 ADELPHIA 500.00 6910 SHEA HOMES 405.75 6915 RON WIDINER 309.50 6918 DNA ELECTRIC 345 BARD 51.10 6919 JAIME ANAYA 19.50 f PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 10/30/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 16:07:57 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND FUND TITLE TOTAL REPORT f� f. . QC� . f AMOUNT 410,303.73 M ITEM 10 • C . x� MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL A( "" _ A& AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council BY:. FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk I DATE: October 30, 2002 (CC Meeting 11/6/02) SUBJECT: Consider Amicus Support in Barden v. City of Sacramento BACKGROUND The City Attorney has recommended that the City join the amicus curiae petition for the above - referenced litigation. This is a federal lawsuit brought against the City of Sacramento claiming that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a city's sidewalks must be made "accessible" by the removal and replacement of displaced or broken concrete; by the removal of telephone and utility poles and other "obstructions" in the sidewalk; and by the removal and replacement of sidewalks with an "excessive" cross slope. DISCUSSION The background of the case and the primary issues in this lawsuit are described in the attached letter. To summarize, the United States District Court in Sacramento agreed with the City of Sacramento in holding that the ADA does not require the immediate replacement of sidewalks constructed long before the advent of the ADA, and that a city's existing sidewalks need not be made "accessible." On June 12, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court and held that a city's sidewalks must be made accessible. The City of Sacramento is in the process of preparing a petition asking the United States Supreme Court to review the matter and reverse the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The City is requesting amicus participation in both submitting the petition asking the Supreme Court to take the case and on the merits of the case if it is accepted by the Court. The attached letter states that amicus participation by other entities and organizations would be at no cost. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct the City Attorney to sign the representation form authorizing the City of Moorpark to be added to the amicus curiae petition. Attachment: Letter from City of Sacramento dated 10/14/2002 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR October 14, 2002 Ken Gilbert Director Of Public Works Moorpark Moorpark CA 93021 Dear Mr. Gilbert: CITY" OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ' T 660J STREET SUITE 250 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 -2413 PH 916 -808 -7100 FAX 916 - 264 -5573 www.dt}ofs mmento.org I am writing to you concerning a federal lawsuit brought against the City of Sacramento which has serious implications for all cities and counties (as well as telecommunications and utility companies) in California and throughout the United States. A law firm representing disabled individuals brought a lawsuit against the City of Sacramento claiming that under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a city's sidewalks must be made "accessible" by the removal and replacement of displaced or broken concrete; by the removal of telephone and utility poles and other "obstructions" in the sidewalk; and by the removal and replacement of sidewalks with an "excessive" cross slope. The ADA does not require the immediate replacement of sidewalks constructed long before the advent of the ADA; rather, the ADA mandates an incremental process of providing "accessibility" by requiring that those structures built or significantly altered after the effective date of the ADA need be constructed or altered to make them accessible to the disabled. The United States District Court in Sacramento agreed with the City of Sacramento in holding that a city's existing sidewalks need not be made "accessible." On June 12, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court and held that a city's sidewalks must be made accessible. The financial implications for cities, counties, telecommunication and utility companies if this decision is permitted to stand are enormous. This decision is the only decision on this issue in the United States and must be followed by all public entities in the Western United States and will probably be followed by lower federal courts in the remainder of the United States. The City of Sacramento is in the process of preparing a Petition asking the United States Supreme Court to review the matter and reverse the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The City is requesting amicus participation in both submitting the Petition asking the Supreme Court to take the case and on the merits of the case if it is accepted by the Court. Amicus counsel has already been retained and amicus participation by other entities and organizations would be at no cost. Enclosed is a form response authorizing your participation in the Amicus Petition and briefs on the merits. The deadline for submission of the City's Petition is December 4, 2002. In order to allow sufficient time for inclusion on the Amicus Petition we need a response by November IS, 2002. I appreciate your time in considering this matter and hope that Moorpark joins the National League of Cities and members of the League of California Cities in asking the Supreme Court to review this matter and overturn the Ninth Circuit. If you have any questions or concerns, you or your legal counsel may contact Gerald C. Hicks at the Sacramento City Attorney's Office at (916) 264 -5346. Sincerely, Mike Kash'w gi Director of a lic Works Enclosure ITEM 10-"I)- MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL 'Aln_ eZd zzi-ll REPORT BY: � TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: October 25, 2002 (Council Meeting 11 -6 -02) SUBJECT: Selection of a Consultant to Prepare the Arroyo Simi Trail Study nTgrTTgqTnM A. Grant The City received a Federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality [CMAQ] grant for the preparation of the subject study. In March of 2001, the City Council approved the Supplemental Agreement between the City and Caltrans, pertaining to the administration of this grant. The amount of the grant is $120,000, with a minimum local match of $30,000. B. Trail Stud The purpose of the subject study [ "Study "] is: 1) to determine the feasibility of establishing a trail system along the Arroyo Simi through the City of Moorpark and easterly to Madera Road [See Exhibit `B'], to connect to an existing arroyo trail system in the City of Simi Valley; and, if feasible, 2) to provide an implementation plan setting forth the requirements and /or constraints associated with the development of such a project. C. Scope of Work The general scope of work for the Study is set forth in Exhibit A. The purpose and scope of the Study does not include a full environmental assessment of the affected area and the approval of an environmental document for a "Project ". The scope also does not include the preparation of final design plans for a Project. Again, the purpose of the Study is to identify options and provide recommendations regarding the feasibility of developing and implementing any of those options. Trail—Study Trail Study October 25, 2002 Page 2 D. Utilization of Levee Maintenance Roads The alignment identified for the subject trail study is the Arroyo Simi. The assumption is that the trail would utilize the levee maintenance roads where the Arroyo channel is improved or planned to be improved: The Scope of Work will include a discussion of both obstacles (road bridges) and alternative routes (streets and easements) to this scheme. It should be noted, however, that the subject work is a feasibility study - not an Alignment Study. A more in -depth analysis of alignments and constraints will have to be the subject of a separate future effort. E. Proposals A Request for Proposals (RFP) was distributed to fourteen (14) firms. Proposals were received from three (3) firms: • Alta Design Group • RRM Design Group • Parsons F. Evaluation / Recommendation Staff has completed the review and evaluation of the Proposals submitted. Based on that review and evaluation, staff recommends the selection of RRM Design Group to perform the subject Study. The conclusion reached by staff is that this firm is the best suited to provide the services required by the City. G. Fee Quotations Subsequent to the evaluation and ranking of the proposals, the separate sealed fee proposals were opened. The fee amounts quoted are summarized as follows: • Alta Design Group $114,379 • RRM Design Group $115,375 (as revised) • Parsons $144,998 The above amounts do not include reimbursable expenses. H. Budget The FY02 /03 Budget has funds appropriated [Project 80351 for this project, summarized as follows: • Fund 2603 - LTF $ 30,000 • Fund 2604 - Federal Grants $120,000 $150,000 Trail—Study Trail Study October 25, 2002 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve selection of RRM Design Group to prepare the subject study for a fee amount not to exceed $125,000, and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement for this work, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and the City Attorney. Attachments: Exhibit `A': Scope of Work Trail—Study Exhibit 'A' Scope of Work Arroyo Simi Trail Study A. Objectives The objective of the SERVICE is to develop a feasibility study and implementation plan [ "Study /Plan "] for the possible future construction of a "multi -user trail" (equestrian, pedestrian, bicycle) along the Arroyo Simi, from the westerly Moorpark City Limit, easterly through the City and the unincorporated County area east of the City, to the westerly terminus of an existing trail system along the Arroyo within the City of Simi Valley. The Study /Plan shall identify the problems and /or obstacles to the construction of the extended trail system (right -of -way needs, topography, environmentally sensitive areas, wetlands preservation, engineering issues, access, future maintenance responsibilities, security issues, construction funding, maintenance requirements / cost / financing, etc.). The Study /Plan would also provide possible solutions to the problems identified, such as alternate alignments, etc. B. Trail Segments Route Segments: The Study /Plan shall address Segment A and Segment B of the Trail separately. Segments A & B are identified as follows: • Segment A: That portion of the Trail to be located on a maintenance levee road which is part of the improved Arroyo Simi channel, extending from the Peach Hill Wash confluence (near Hitch Road) , easterly to the limits of the existing channel improvements at the rail crossing north of Science Drive. • Segment (s) Bl: Those portions of the Trail to be located along the "unimproved" portions of the Arroyo Simi, upstream of the existing channel improvements which currently terminate at the rail crossing north of Science Drive. • Segments) B2: Those portions of the Trail, if any, proposed to be situated within [Class 2 or Class 31 any roadway (i.e. "Old" Los Angeles Avenue) or adjacent to any roadway [Class 11. • Segment(s) B3: Those portions of the Trail, if any, proposed to be located on private property in order to connect Segments B1 & B2. C UOI )b Exhibit 'A' [Page 21 Scope of Work Arroyo Simi Trail Study C. Scope of Services The scope of SERVICES shall include those tasks and services outlined in the Proposal (Exhibit `B') revised and amended to address certain requirements noted as follows: 1. Segment A [Improved Channel] : The Study /Plan shall address the following: a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features and attributes of the proposed Trail. b. Constraints: Describe any obstacles (road crossings, etc.) to implementation. c.Feasibility: It is presumed that the placement of a Trail along this segment is feasible. So state, or explain why it is not. d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps necessary to implement a Trail along this Segment. This description shall include or address: • needed improvements; • permit requirements; • indemnity / insurance requirements; • security issues; • liability exposure; and • any other component or prerequisite to the approval of the use of the channel levee maintenance road and the construction and maintenance of the Trail. e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility. f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs. 2.Segment B1 [Unimproved Arroyo]: The Study /Plan shall address the following: a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features and attributes of this /these Segment(s)of the Trail. Alternative routes may be described. b. Constraints: Describe the obstacles and constraints to implementing this (these) Segment(s). Such analysis shall include, but not be limited to: • environmentally sensitive areas; • flood inundation; • flood damage; • security; • liability; etc. c. Feasibility: Render an opinion regarding the feasibility of implementing this Segment of the Trail. d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps necessary to implement a Trail along this (these) Segment(s). This description shall include or address: > needed improvements; Traill Agr C; JO :i60 Exhibit 'A' [Page 31 Scope of Work Arroyo Simi Trail Study • permit requirements from all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction; • the scope and degree of the environmental review process anticipated to be necessary, with estimated costs; • indemnity / insurance issues; • security improvements and issues; • any other component or prerequisite to the approval of the placement of a Trail along the unimproved Arroyo. e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility. f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs. 3. Segment B2 & B3 [Roadways and Other Locations]: The Study /Plan shall address the following: a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features and attributes of the proposed Trail. Which portions of any such Trail alignment are proposed to be a Class I facility. b. Constraints: Describe any obstacles (acquisition of right -of -way, easement, etc.). c. Feasibility: Render an opinion regarding the feasibility of implementing this (these) Segment(s) of the Trail. d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps necessary to implement a Trail along this (these) Segment(s). This description shall include or address: • needed improvements; • permit requirements; • right -of -way acquisition; • indemnity / insurance requirements; • security / liability; • any other component or prerequisite to the implementation of this (these) Segment(s). e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility. f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs. 4. Funding Options: The Final Report shall summarize various funding methods, sources, etc. 5. Ownership / Operation: If a Trail east of the City is deemed to be feasible, the Final Report shall discuss and recommend which Agency or Agencies should assume the responsibility for funding, design, entitlement procurement, ownership, operation, and maintenance of the Trail. Traill_Agr C �)! i° j_&1&;;_ Exhibit 'A' [Page 41 Scope of Work Arroyo Simi Trail Study 6. Work Components and /or Requirements: The work components and /or requirements shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Field Survey; b.Environmental survey and assessment; c. Affected Property ownership information (Assessor Role); d.Listing of Regulatory Agencies having jurisdiction; e. Development of Conceptual Alternatives; f.Discussion of Project Benefits; g. Identification of all constraints and obstacles; h. Description {Implementation Plan} of all of the processes, prerequisites and requirements related to the development and implementation of the project, including the steps necessary to seek all necessary clearances and approvals. i.Description of all "soft" (design, permitting, entitlements, etc.) and "hard" (construction) costs associated with project development (design /permitting) and implementation (construction). j. Description of anticipated annual maintenance cost. Said cost shall include a contingency for repair and /or reconstruction of any trail segment subject to flooding and /or flood damage. Note: Work components shall not include: a. Property Appraisals b. An approved Environmental Document 7. Resources: The CONSULTANT is advised of certain available resources which may facilitate the work and /or reduce the costs for same. Said resources include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Aerial photography recently completed by the County of Ventura and available to the City pursuant to a recently executed Agreement. b. Topographic Survey and Hydrology information in the final stages of preparation by the Ventura County Flood Control District. c. Available GIS data. 8. Tasks: The tasks and sub -tasks required shall be as set forth in the Proposal, except that said tasks shall be modified to address the requirements set forth above. 9. Meetings: Meetings shall be limited to coordination meetings with City staff, as required, and one presentation of the final work product to the City Council. No Community Meetings to seek input for project development will be necessary. Traill_A9r SJ g V'lV °.C..�Ihs E � � � I n call 'c AMPU5 PARX D kFAAAN s I • mi VA LEY - Ole r OVoeaeil� A fk KPAIkK A 0 93021 !-:t- y n �11 v 77-7, ARROYO SIMI TRAIL STUDY AREA rr vD RD MOORPXRK 4- 4 ANUI F, AV I FW 'o-4 of call 'c AMPU5 PARX D kFAAAN s I • mi VA LEY - Ole r OVoeaeil� A fk KPAIkK A 0 93021 !-:t- y n �11 v 77-7, ARROYO SIMI TRAIL STUDY AREA rr vD RD T0. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: OVERVIEW MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council TI, 10 • E- Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works October 25, 2002 (Council Meeting 11 -6 -02) Adjustment to the Hourly Rates Charged for Engineering Services. This requests approval of a 1.8% increase to the rates charged by the consultant City Engineer for engineering services. T)TQ(TTQQTnT\T A. Background: In March of 1991 the City entered into an Agreement for City Engineering Services with Charles Abbott Associates. B. Retainer 1. Agreement: Paragraphs A & B of Section I of the Agreement provide for an automatic adjustment (not to exceed 7 %) to the retainer for City Engineer and Traffic Engineering Services, to occur on December 1 of each year, based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index. 2. Last Adjustment: The last adjustment to the Retainer amounts was made January 2002. 3. CPI Increase 2002: There has been a 1.8% increase in the CPI [ "U. S. City Average for All Urban Consumers All Items Indexes "] during the one -year period ending August 2002. Using that 1.8% inflation factor, changes to the existing amounts for the Engineering retainers are summarized as follows: Service City Engineer Traffic Engineer En9fee02 Current Amount ($) 2,781 439 Revised Amnt. ($) Effective 12 -1 -02 2,831 447 Rates for Engineering Services October 25, 2002 Page 2 4. No Action Required: As stated above, this is an automatic increase. No City Council action is necessary. C. Request for Adjustment to Hourly Rates for Services 1. Agreement: The Agreement for Engineering Services also states that the City may consider a request for a Cost -of- Living Adjustment to the hourly rates charged for Engineering Services. 2. Past Years: It has been the practice of the City Council in past years to approve the consultant City Engineer's request for an adjustment to the hourly rates for engineering services, based upon the same CPI increase data used to adjust the amount of the Retainers. 3. Request for Increase: Attached as Exhibit 1 is a letter (10- 18 -02) requesting an increase to the hourly rates charged for engineering services. The amount of the requested increase is 1.8% -- the same amount as the automatic increase to the retainer fees. The effective date for this requested increase is December 1, 2002. D. Follow -up Administrative Actions If the requested increase to the hourly rates for services is approved, an Amendment to the Engineering Services Agreement effecting this change will be executed by the City Manager. RECOMMENDATION Approve a 1.8% increase to the rates charged for Engineering Services, effective December 1, 2002. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Request Engfee0l /` . � ,,,; CAA PROFESSIONAL BUILDING &. SAFETY /ENGINEERING /INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT October 18, 2002 Steven Kueny, City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark CA, 93021 Dear Steve, As outlined by provisions in our contract for Engineering Services to the City of Moorpark dated March 1, 1991 and modified on October 20, 1999, we will be increasing our retainer fees and fee rates to keep pace with Consumer Price Index (CPI). I have attached a copy of the CPI for the period 1992 through September 2002. During the period of August 2001 through August 2002 the increase in the CPI for "U.S. Cities Average for All Urban Consumers" during the period rose from 177.5 to 181.0, an increase of 1.8 %. This is the index specified in our contract with the City. Our rates will be increased by 1.8% and the increase will take effect December 1, 2002. I have attached Exhibits `A' and `B' that show the retainer fees and hourly rates, respectively, that will take effect on December 1. I have also attached, as Exhibit `C', a copy of the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI printout from 1992 to September 2002. It shows the increase in the CPI for "U.S. Cities Average for All Urban Consumers ". We look forward to working with you and City staff to provide service to the community of Moorpark in the coming years. Sincerely, Walter Brown. City Engineer c: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director Debbie Traffenstedt, City Clerk & Acting Community Development Director Rusty Reed, CAA Diana Blunt, CAA Project file, Engineering Fees Chronological. File Encl: Exhibit `A', Retainer Fees Exhibit `B', Hourly Rates Exhibit `C', Consumer Price Index — All Urban Consumers �. 19 13 Charles Abbott Associates City of Moorpark EXHIBIT 'A' December 1, 2002 Retainer Fees Adjustments City Engineering Contract Service Item Monthly Fee Computed as of December 2001 01 to 02 All Urban Consumers CPI* Increase Monthly Fee Effective on December 1, 2002 I. A. General Services Retainer $2,781 1.80% $2,831 I.B. Traffic Engineering Retainer $439 1.80% $447 I.C. Plan and Map Checking See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.D. Land Development Review See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.E. Encroachment Permits See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.F. Land Development Inspection See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.G. C.I.P. Projects /Misc. Projects See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates I.H. Services by Others See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates 1.80% See Exhibit B for Hourly Rates * Based on U.S. Cities Average August 2001 = 177.5, August 2002 = 180.7 (1967 = 100), Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers �p fF W Charles Abbott Associates City of Moorpark EXHIBIT 'B' December 1, 2002 Hourly Rate Adjustments Classification Hourly Rates Effective on December 2001 CPI ** Increase Hourly Rates Effective on December 1, 2002 Principal $140 1.80% $143 Project Supervisor $112 1.80% $114 Project Manager $98 1.80% $100 Senior Engineer $106 1.80% $108 Traffic Engineer $92 1.80% $94 Civil Engineer $92 1.80% $94 Associate Civil Engineer $82 1.80% $83 Assistant Civil Engineer $66 1.80% $67 Designer $79 1.80% $80 Senior Draftsman $53 1.80% $54 Draftsman $42 1.80% $43 Engineering Technician $44 1.80% $45 Construction Administrator $106 1.80% $108 Construction Inspector $67 1.80% $68 Building Official $92 1.80% $94 Senior Building Inspector $74 1.80% $75 Building Inspector $64 1.80% $65 Permit Technician $56 1.80% $57 2 - Person Survey Crew $176 1.80% $179 3 - Person Survey Crew $223 1.80% $227 Secretarial/Word Processor $39 1.80% $40 * Hourly rates shown are rounded to the nearest one dollar ** U.S. Cities Average (1967 = 100), Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers Change Output From: 1992 To: 2002 { Options: r include graphs NEW! More Formatting Options mm*�- s €t' Urban Cori sti nez'> Original Data Value Series Id: CUUROOOOSAO Not Seasonally Adjusted Area: U.S. city average Item: All items Base Period: 1982 -84 =100 Yx ar Jan Felt Mar Apr lvtay Sun jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec knnuaI HALF1 HALF2 1992 138.1 138.6 139.3 139.5 139.7 140.2 140.5 140.9 141.3 141.8 142.0 141.9 140.3 139.2 141.4 1993 142.6 143.1 143.6 144.0 144.2 144.4 144.4 144.8 145.1 145.7 145.8 145.8 144.5 143.7 145.3 1994.146.2 146.7 147.2 147.4 147.5 148.0 148.4 149.0 149.4 149.5 149.7 149.7 148.2 147.2 149.3 1995 150.3 150.9 151.4 151.9 152.2 152.5 152.5 152.9 153.2 153.7 153.6 153.5 152.4 151.5 153.2 1996 154.4 154.9 155.7 156.3 156.6 156.7 157.0 157.3 157.8 158.3 158.6 158.6 156.9 155.8 157.9 1997 159.1 159.6 160.0 160.2 160.1 1.60.3 160.5 160.8 161.2 161.6 161.5 161.3 160.5 159.9 161.2 199 161.6 161.9 162.2 162.5 162.8 163.0 163.2 163.4 163.6 164.0 164.0 163.9 163.0 162.3 163.7 1999 164.3 164.5 165.0 166.2 166.2 166.2 166.7 167.1 167.9 168.2 168.3 168.3 166.6 165.4 167.8 2000 168.8 169.8 171.2 171.3 171.5 172.4 172.8 172.8 173.7 174.0 174.1 174.0 172.2 170.8 173.6 2001 175.1 175.8 176.2 176.9 177.7 178.0 177.5 177.5 178.3 177.7 177.4 176.7 X177.1 176.6 177.5 2'002 177.1 177.8 178.8 179.8 179.8 179.9 180.1 180.7 181.0 118.9 EXHIBIT 'C' Frequently Asked Questions I Freedom of Information Act I Customer Survey Privacy & Security Statement I Linking to Our Site I Accessibility Information U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Phone: (202) 691 -5200 Postal Square Building Fax -on- demand: (202) 691 -6325 2 Massachusetts Ave., NE Data questions: bisdata staff@bis.gov Washington, DC 20212 -0001 Technical (web) questions: webmaster @b!s.gov Other comments: feedback @b!s.gov C 'li R �� V CC 13' 6� http:// data.bls.gov /cgi- bin/surveymost 10/18/02 Moorpark City Council — Agenda Report TO: The Honorable City Council. f FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: October 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 11 -6 -02) SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for the Miller Parkway Widening Project [Project 80321 D T r' Vrl-D nT TTTT ) In May of this year the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of a project to widen Miller Parkway at the northeast corner of that street and Peach Hill Road, in order to facilitate south -to -north "U- Turn" traffic movements at that intersection. MT C(IT TC C Tr)NT A. Project Description An excerpt of the project plan, showing the required street widening, is attached as Exhibit 1. The Scope of Work is generally described as follows: • Relocate and /or replace traffic signal poles; • Relocate traffic signal pull boxes; • Relocate a storm drain catch basin; • Remove and replace curb & gutter; • Remove and replace sidewalk; • Construct asphalt pavement; • Transplant tree; • Replace irrigation system; • Replant ground cover and shrubs; and • Regrading at back of sidewalk. B. Right -of -Way As shown on Exhibit 1, additional street right -of -way was required for the construction of the project. This property was deeded to the City by the Serenata HOA. Miller_mod_cmp Miller Parkway Modification U -Turn Traffic Movement October 24, 2002 Page 2 C. Fiscal Impact 1. Contract Cost: A summary of the final contract cost is as follows: Description Total Bid Amount 101,476.75 Quantity Adjustment a 1,119.75 Change Orders b 3,676.62 Total 106,273.12 Notes: a) The actual quantities required were slightly more than the engineer's estimate. b)There was one Change Order to modify the base material for the new sidewalk. 2. Total Project Costs: A summary of the total project costs is as follows: Description Description Total $ Design 15,000.00 Right -of -way 0.00 Costruction Plus Prior Design Costs Pole Procurement a 5,078.00 Contract Amount 106,273.12 Additional Slope Landscaping b 1,425.00 Inspection 2,000.00 Total 129,776.12 Notes: a) In that the delivery time for the procurement of new poles and mast arms is approximately fourteen (14) weeks, the City initiated those procurement efforts prior to the opening of the bids. Those materials were delivered within a timeframe which did not cause a delay in the construction of the project. b) additional slope landscaping was ordered from a separate vendor at a lower cost. 3. Budget Summary: This project is funded by the Traffic Mitigation Fund [Fund 2002]. A summary of the project budget is as follows: Surplus Description Current Budget Design 14,000.00 Right -of -Way 500.00 Construction 117,000.00 Plus Prior Design Costs 3,000.00 Total Project 134,500.00 Miller mod cmp Actual Cost Surplus 15,000.00 (1,000.00) 0.00 500.00 112,776.12 4,223.88 2,000.00 1,000.00 129,776.12 4,723.88 Miller Parkway Modification U -Turn Traffic Movement October 24, 2002 Page 3 D. Final Inspection, Acceptance, Landscape Maintenance Phase Staff has completed a final inspection of the project and has found the work to be acceptable. The project specifications require the contractor to provide for the maintenance of landscaping in the project area for a period of six (6) months from the date the landscape improvements have been found to be substantially complete. These maintenance efforts do not include utility costs (the existing irrigation systems are under the control of the HOA and /or the City), but do require the contractor to replace any dead plants during the maintenance period. At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to accept the project as complete and direct the City Clerk to record a Notice of Completion to start the final lien period. E. Release of Retention Although the lien period will terminate thirty -five (35) days subsequent to the recordation of the Notice of Completion, it is the intent of staff to retain all or a significant portion of the ten percent (100) retention until satisfactory completion of the six (6) month maintenance period. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Accept the work as complete and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Plan Miller mod cmp IT cl O co 1,3 o, 1 c / _ W 3 V lYw J3 16 \ \ \ \\ T - �_ 1j� �: `•.qhy {� �;% ! rte'` ? +: 19 ,I CO UA -� 12 � _- ` N �✓ 18 � �ExrSTiN _ � ExiSTI ON RA J G' s 1A _ IRIPINC Ao w 7�2j - 'X/STING CURB GUTTER I =E-X /S TING SIDE W 4 K _ EXISTiN G R /w M 1 L L E R PARKWAY CURVE TABLE LE - -- , CRV DEL TA L EN RAD TAN 1 14'03'52" 22 n4' on nn, 11 , ,. 47, MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL `'' �' Irk AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Johnny Ea, Budget & Finance Manager DATE: October 15, 2002 (CC Meeting of November 6, 2002) SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - ADOPTING THE ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF MOORPARK SUMMARY State law requires the City Council to annually review and adopt the City's Investment Policy at a public meeting (Gov. Code § 53646) . The requirement for an annual Investment Policy update ensures consistency with respect to current laws and allows the City Council to review portfolio objectives. DISCUSSION The attached investment policy contains no changes from the current policy. The current policy meets the City's needs and is in compliance with California Government Codes. Staff recommends the approval of this policy for fiscal year 2002 -03. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - Moorpark's Investment Policy. Attached: Resolution 2002- establishing the City of RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY WHEREAS, on October 17, 2001, the City Council reviewed and adopted the City of Moorpark's investment policy; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the Council requesting adoption of the annual statement of investment policy; and WHEREAS, the investment policy describes the investment of City funds in compliance with the Municipal Code and state law, and, therefore, the investment policy is to be hereby submitted to an oversight committee in compliance with state law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The annual statement of investment policy attached hereto as "Exhibit A" has been reviewed in a public meeting and is hereby adopted. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of November 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: City of Moorpark Investment Policy Resolution 2002 - Exhibit "A" CITY OF MOORPARK INVESTMENT POLICY 1. PURPOSE This policy is intended to establish objectives and criteria for the investment of idle and surplus public funds for the City of Moorpark and the Redevelopment Agency. 2. POLICY It is the policy of the City of Moorpark to invest public funds in accordance with the principals of sound treasury management and the provisions of California Government Code § 53600 et seq., the Municipal Code and this policy. The objectives of this investment policy are, in order of priority: Safety - Safety of principal is foremost. Investments shall be made exercising the "prudent person" standard to ensure preservation of capital in the portfolio by limiting investment risk. Since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio shall consist largely of securities with active secondary or resale markets and instruments that can be easily converted to cash. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is defined "as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security ". Investing in the highest grade of securities and diversifying the portfolio will mitigate this risk. Market risk is defined "as the market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates ". Structuring the portfolio based upon historic and current cash flow analysis and limiting the average investment to portfolio to three years will mitigate this economic cycle risk. Liquidity - The portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to meet unforeseen events reasonably anticipated. The cash management system is designed to monitor and forecast revenues and expenditures in order to maximize investment to the fullest extent possible. Cash management, timing of maturity and retaining investments that can be converted to cash within a 24- hour period assure liquidity. • Return on Investment - The portfolio is designed to meet the safety and liquidity objectives first, then return, which represents a source of significant potential revenues, throughout budgetary and economic cycles. 3. SCOPE This policy applies to all investment activities of the City of Moorpark, except for the proceeds of certain debt issues that are invested and managed by trustees appointed under indenture agreements. To effectively manage resources, cash is pooled separately for the City and Redevelopment Agency. The City Treasurer shall strive to invest as close to 100% of all surplus funds as possible. All pooled funds are accounted for in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Moorpark. Funds include the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Fund, Capital Projects Funds and Trust and Agency Funds. 4. PRUDENCE The "prudent investor" standard shall be used and applied to the management of the overall portfolio. Persons to whom investment decisions have been delegated are trustees with fiduciary duty. The prudent investor shall act with care, skill and diligence under circumstances then prevailing as established by law. (Gov. Code, §53637). 5. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES By Council Ordinance investment authority is delegated to the City Treasurer. No person may engage in investment transactions unless directed by the Treasurer. The City Treasurer may establish accounts with well qualified, financially sound financial institutions and /or brokers /dealers for the purpose of completing investment transactions. The City Treasurer is required to annually render a statement of investment policy to the City Council to be considered at a public meeting. A copy of the investment policy shall be filed with to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. The City Treasurer is required to submit the investment policy to the Commission each calendar year and within 60 days of any subsequent policy amendment. The City Treasurer is required to submit quarterly investment reports to the City Council and City Manager. The investment report shall comply with the requirements of Gov. Code, §53646. A copy of the City's second and fourth quarter investment report shall be filed with the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission that is due within 60 days following the close of the quarter. 6. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that may conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall make appropriate disclosures under the Fair Political Practices 2 g6 Act, and may seek the advice of the City Attorney and the Fair Political Practices Commission whenever there is a question concerning personal, financial or investment positions that could represent potential conflicts of interest. 7. AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public depository as established by State law. The City Treasurer shall maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services. All institutions who desire to become qualified bidders will be given a copy of the City's investment policy and verify understanding by completing the City's Investment Policy receipt. The City Treasurer will conduct an annual review of the financial condition and registrations of qualified institutions. Potential broker /dealer's will complete the City's credit worthiness questionnaire and certification information form. In addition to the questionnaire, bidders must also provide current audited financial statements, proof of National Association of Security Dealers certification, proof of California registration and verification that the firm has read and understands the City's investment policy. Completion of the questionnaire is only part of the City's certification process and does not guarantee approval. 8. AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS The City Treasurer is empowered by California Government Code Section 53601 to invest in the following types of securities subject to the limitations set out in that section and this policy. A. General Investment Instruments: (1) State of California pooled "Local Agency Investment Fund" in accordance with the regulations governing that Fund; (2) Insured deposits: Deposits not exceeding $100,000, shall be permitted only in those financial institutions that are active members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The "Sweep" account for the overnight investment of idle funds shall be subject to this policy; (3) U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes: provided that the stated final maturity of such security does not exceed five (5) years from the date of purchase. Securities issued by agencies shall be limited to a maximum of 40% of the total portfolio; and (4) U.S. Government Federal Agency Issues: Mortgage backed securities with a fixed coupon, provided that the stated final maturity of such security does not exceed five (5) years from the date of purchase. Securities issued by agencies shall be limited to a maximum of 40% of the total portfolio and 20% in securities issued by one federal agency. 3 _ B. Collateralized Investment Instruments: (1) Time Certificates of Deposit, major Banks or Savings & Loans: Deposits should not exceed one -year maturity and shall be collateralized as specified in Section 9 of this policy and shall not exceed 30% of the portfolio. C. Bank Guaranteed Investment Instruments: (1) Banker's Acceptances, Foreign/Domestic, with a minimum rating of "Al" by Standard & Poors or "P 1" by Moody's (prime) rating provided that the acceptances are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System and the maturity does not exceed 180 days maturity or 20% of the total portfolio; (2) Commercial Paper: Short-term instruments with fixed coupons, fixed maturity and no call provisions issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States, with an "A1/P1" (prime) rating or better. Purchases may not exceed 180 days maturity or 15% of the portfolio. 9. COLLATERALIZATION Certificates of deposit shall be fully insured up to $100,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation, as appropriate. Investments in time certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 shall be collateralized as required by law. 10. UNAUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS /INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES Investments not authorized in Section 8 of this policy are disallowed. California Government Code §53601.6 disallows the following: inverse floaters, rage notes, or interest -only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages. Futures, options, or any leveraged purchases, reverse - repurchases, and speculations on interest rates are specifically not allowed by this policy. 11. INVESTMENT STRATEGY A buy and hold strategy will generally be followed; that is, pooled investments once made will usually be held until maturity. A buy and hold strategy requires that the portfolio be kept sufficiently liquid to preclude the undesirable sale of investments prior to maturity. Occasionally, the City Treasurer may find it advantageous to sell an investment prior to maturity, but this should be only on an exception basis and only when it is clearly favorable to do so. To further provide for liquidity, investments will be made only in readily marketable securities actively traded in the secondary market. Investments by trustees are required to conform to bond indenture agreements and do not follow this policy. 4 u :. _L? 9 12. DIVERSIFICATION To the extent feasible the portfolio will be diversified to avoid market risk. With the exception of U.S. Treasury /Federal agency securities and authorized pools, no more than five percent (5 %) of the portfolio shall be placed with a single issuer. 13. MAXIMUM MATURITIES To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. To protect public funds from market price losses, investment maturities will be laddered. At least fifty percent (50 %) of the portfolio shall mature within one year from the date of purchase. No more than twenty -five percent (25 %) of the entire portfolio may have a maturity date between three (3) and five (5) years from the purchase date. Investments with a maturity greater than five (5) years will not be made. The average portfolio investment maturity shall be three (3) years or less. A dollar - weighted average will be used in computing the average maturity of the portfolio. 14. PAYMENT, DELIVERY, SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All security transactions entered into by the City shall be conducted on a delivery- versus- payment basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the City Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. 15. INTERNAL CONTROL The City Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. 16. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The investment portfolio will be designed to obtain a market average rate of return during budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City's investment risk constraints and cash flow needs. 17. INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION California Government Code § 53646(a) requires the City Treasurer to render to the City Council a statement of investment policy no less frequently than once a year for adoption. The city's investment policy and any modifications thereto shall be considered at a public meeting. Adoption shall be made by resolution of the City Council. 5 INVESTMENT POLICY GLOSSARY ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE (BA): A time draft of invested funds that have been drawn on and accepted for repayment by a bank. By accepting the draft (investment of City funds), the bank is liable for the payment at maturity. This financial instrument is short-term, not more than 270 days. Not more than 30% of the City's portfolio may be placed with any one bank. BID: The price offered for securities. BOND INDENTURE: Written agreement specifying terms and conditions for issuing bonds, including; the form of the bond, the maturity date and payment schedule with interest rate, call provisions and protective covenants, if any, collateral pledged, and other terms. Obligations of the bond issuer are identified as well as the trustee's responsibilities. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission paid by the initiator of the transaction or by both sides; a broker does not position. In the money market, brokers are active in markets, in which banks buy and sell money, and in inter- dealer markets. BUY AND HOLD: Management strategy in which the intent is to hold each security until maturity. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity and interest rate evidenced by a certificate. There is a penalty for early withdrawal. CD's in large denominations are typically negotiable. COLLATERAL: Refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. Also refers to evidence of deposit or other property that a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. COUPON: The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value or a certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. COMMERCIAL BOOK - ENTRY: The commercial book -entry system is operated by the Federal Reserve Banks in their capacity as fiscal agents of the Treasury. Investors who maintain their securities in this system generally have purchased their securities through a financial institution or a government securities broker or dealer. These securities are recorded in the commercial book -entry system as book -entry issues held for the account of a depository institution. The depository institution (e.g., bank, brokerage firm or securities clearance organization) maintains records identifying the owners of securities held in its account in the system. COMMERCIAL PAPER: Short-term, unsecured promissory note of industrial corporations, utilities and bank holding company. The notes are in bearer form starting at $100,000. State law limits the City to investments in United States corporations having assets in excess of five hundred million dollars with a "A" or higher rating. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for their own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: "delivery versus payment" and "delivery versus receipt" (also called free). Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities indicating payment is due when the buyer has securities in hand or in book entry. DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its value at maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be a discount. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non - interest bearing money market instruments that are issued at a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U.S. Treasury bills. DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., small business firms, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. These are securities such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), Federal Farm Credit Bureau (FFCB), Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and the Small Business Administration (SBA). FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which FED funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open market operations. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE: Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve Guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. 7 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., twelve Regional Banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $100,000 per deposit. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): The institutions that regulate and lend to savings and loan associations. The Federal Home Loan Banks play a role analogous to that played by the Federal Reserve Banks vis -a -vis member commercial banks. LEVERAGE: Investing with borrowed money with the exception that the interest earned on the investment will exceed the interest paid on the borrowed money. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked price is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions of the State of California that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. This is voluntary investment program offering agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio which daily invests hundreds of millions of dollars and using the investment expertise of the State Treasurer's Office investment staff, at no additional cost to the taxpayer. Investment in LAIF, considered a short-term investment, is readily available for cash withdrawal on a daily basis. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MEDIUM TERM CORPORATE NOTES: Corporate notes issued with fixed coupons and maturity. A promissory note of the issuer used to finance current obligations, which is a negotiable instrument. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, etc) are issued and traded. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD): Although technically a deposit, it is a short-term note, which earns the depositor a competitive rate of return. Negotiable certificates of deposit were developed so large deposits could be made at a competitive interest rate with some liquidity. 8 NOMINEE: Registered owner of a stock or bond if difference from the beneficial owner, who acts as holder of record for securities and other assets. Typically, this arrangement is done to facilitate the transfer of securities when it is inconvenient to obtain the signature of the real owner, or the actual owner may not wish to be identified. Nominee ownership simplifies the registration and transfer of securities. OFFER: The price asked by the seller of securities. When buying securities you ask for an offer. See Asked and Bid. OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the Federal Open Market Committee in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve's most important and most flexible monetary policy tool. POOLED INVESTMENTS: Resources grouped for advantage of the participants. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. A portfolio is considered "laddered" when with securities in each maturity range (e.g. monthly) over a specified period of time (e.g. five years). PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government security dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statement to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered securities broker - dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a legal list of securities selected by the state. In other states, the trustee may invest in a security if it is one, which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeding a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution that has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. These financial institutions do not claim exemption from the payment of any sales, compensating use or ad valorem taxes under State laws, and which has segregated, for the benefit of the Commission, eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the current income return. 9 SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. See Third Party Custodian. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC): Agency created by Congress to protect investor's transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE 15C3 -1: See uniform net capital rule. STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government sponsored enterprises and corporations which have imbedded options in their debt structure (e.g., call features, step - up coupons, floating rate coupons and derivative -based returns). Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the yield curve. This includes securities from the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA). SWEEP ACCOUNT: Short-term income account into which all available cash balances from the non - interest bearing checking accounts. Transfers are automatic on a daily basis. The sweep is used in conjunction with "zero balance" accounts to maximize investment of idle cash. THIRD PARTY CUSTODIAN: Corporate agent, usually a commercial bank, who, acting as trustee, holds securities under a written agreement for a client and buys and sells securities when instructed. Custody service includes securities safekeeping, and collection of dividends and interest. The bank acts only as a transfer agent and makes no buy or sell recommendations. TREASURY BILLS: A short-term non - interest bearing security that matures in one year or less and are issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Bills (commonly known as "T" bills) are sold at a discount (a price less than par (face) value) and are paid at par value at maturity. They do not pay interest before maturity. Return is the difference between par and discount price. TREASURY BONDS: Long -term coupon bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than ten years. The bonds pay a fixed rate of interest every six months. TREASURY NOTES: Medium term coupon bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government. Treasury notes mature in two, five or ten years. The notes pay a fixed rate of interest every six months. 10 C J11�, _3t4 UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms, as well as non - member broker /dealers in securities, maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1: also called net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, and is one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. YIELD: The rate of annual return on an investment expressed as a percentage. Income yield is calculated by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. Net yield, or yield to maturity, is the current income minus any premium or plus any discount from par on purchase price, with the adjustment amortized over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the instrument. 11 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT y -, �i- 4 ?or BY: TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Walter Brown, City Engineer PREPARED BY: Clara Magana, Assistant Engineer CA DATE: October 2, 2002 (Meeting of November 6, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Bond Exoneration for Burger King Project (Cimms Inc.) BACKGROUND The Burger King project is a commercial development located on the southeast corner of Los Angeles Ave. and Liberty Bell Rd. On June 24, 1996 the Planning Commission approved the Commercial Planned Development, Permit No. 96 -1. All construction associated with this project has been completed and the bonds have been reduced for at least one year. A vicinity map has been attached for reference. DISCUSSION The developer requests the exoneration of the three remaining sureties on file with the City of Moorpark, associated with the above - mentioned development (see chart). These sureties guaranteed on site and offsite improvements. A11 work covered under the Grading, Street Performance, and Street Labor sureties have been completed. Staff recommends that these bonds be exonerated. The bonds have been reduced for at least one year during the warranty period for the bonded improvements. Provided below is a chart describing recommended actions by staff: `V J,. Honorable City Council October 02, 2002 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate bonds 3SM88956900 and 3SM88957000 as outlined above. ATTACHMENT: 1. `A' Location Map BOND NO. TYPE BOND AMT. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1 3SM88956900 Grading $500.00 exonerate 2 3SM88957000 Street (Perfomance) $1,258.00 exonerate 3 3SM88957000 . Street (Labor) $1,258.00 exonerate STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate bonds 3SM88956900 and 3SM88957000 as outlined above. ATTACHMENT: 1. `A' Location Map i i i� i ps"w HP--i+r EXHIBIT A' CI TY OF MOORPARK BURGER KING RES TA URA NT r� ITEM /a • �Z' MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council ,�2CC�2 28 FROM: John Hartnett, Recreation Superintendent DATE: October 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of November 6, 2002) SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Revising Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities and Rescinding Resolution No. 99 -1582 and Adopt a Resolution Revising Use Fees for the Use of City Facilities and Rescind Resolution No. 99 -1583 BACKGROUND On August 21, 2002, the City Council directed staff to consider the feasibility of a rental fee reduction for Moorpark youth sports organizations. Council requested staff to research this item and provide a proposal to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The action by the Council was taken in response to a request made by Moorpark AYSO. As part of this evaluation process, staff has taken this opportunity to review other procedures and policies in need of change, as well. As a result of this process, staff has developed recommendations for amending the rules and regulations governing the use of City facilities. This report outlines these recommendations. The City Council is being asked to rescind Resolution No. 99- 1582 and adopt Resolution No. 2002- (Revised Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities) and Resolution No. 2002- (Revising Use Fees for the Use of City Facilities). The proposed resolutions (Attachments A and B) reflect recommended updates to the Rules and Regulations relating to the use of City facilities, group classifications and fee schedule. 000190 Honorable City Council October 16, 2002 Page 2 DISCUSSION On September 3, 2002, staff presented a report to the Parks and Recreation Commission outlining the current fees paid for City rentals by local youth sports groups, and comparing the rates to those that would be paid by a local non - profit group at Moorpark College. In summary, the two -hour rental fee at Moorpark College is $38.50. The rental fee for any one room at AVRC or the Community Center for a two -hour period is $60.00. Moorpark Unified School District was also contacted about their rental rates to local non - profit groups. With an anticipated increase in fees in the very near future, youth sports group can anticipate paying the School District $57.00 for a two -hour rental. Staff recommended reducing the rental fee charged to Moorpark non - profit youth sports groups by fifty percent during normal operating hours. Normal operating hours at the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center are defined as 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sunday. Normal operating hours at the Community Center are defined as 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The suggested fee would be $15.00 per hour for a group of up to 50 people, with no additional fees unless the group required set -up or other special arrangements. In the event a Moorpark youth sports organization wishes to rent a room during non - business hours, the current rate of $30.00 would be charged in order to cover staff time and utilities. Youth sports groups rarely, if ever, request rental time outside of the City's normal business hours. The Parks and Recreation Commission concurred with the staff report and recommend to the City Council that the facility rental rate charged to Moorpark non - profit youth sports groups be reduced by fifty percent during normal operating hours. As noted previously, staff has reviewed the existing document that regulates the use of City facilities and recommends some minor restructuring of the rules and regulations for clarification purposes. The elements of the current document have been incorporated within this structure. Some parts of section 3 and 4 were deleted as redundant or not consistent with the recommended use of facilities. 000191 Honorable City Council October 16, 2002 Page 3 Additional administrative changes include adding language that falsification of rental information can result in a loss of security deposit, security deposits may be waived for rentals for meetings of less than 50 attendees, alcohol use be restricted to a maximum of five hours for a single event, and other items as well. In addition to the administrative restructuring, a number of procedural changes are recommended. These and other recommendations are listed as follows: • Group Classifications: Staff recommends adding non- residents under Group 5 classification. Currently, non -City businesses are listed under this classification. This will provide consistency since the City does allow non - residents to rent park facilities. • Reservations Window: Staff recommends implementing a $25 late fee for rentals with less than 30 (thirty) days notice prior to the event instead of the current 14 (fourteen) day window. Reservations with less than 30 days notice create administrative and staffing challenges and an additional charge should be levied for this service. • Security Deposits: Staff recommends a new policy which states that at the Community Services Director's discretion, security deposits may be waived when the rental has less than 50 attendees and is categorized as a meeting. Most meetings with less than 50 attendees are considered low -risk and will eliminate an unnecessary deposit and administrative process. • Hours: Staff recommends that all rentals serving alcohol be limited to a maximum of 5 -hour rental time for the entire event. In addition, when renting the kitchen in conjunction with a room rental, the hours of both rooms must coincide. Currently, alcohol is only allowed at the Community Center. In the past, some events where alcohol is served have continued for up to nine hours or more. Limiting alcoholic consumption to a period of five hours is a reasonable restriction and will put the City and event attendees at a reduced risk. While fees for the use of facilities have not been raised for several years, staff recommends moderately raising a few fees and eliminating some unnecessary deposits. The recommended changes are listed as follows: 000192 Honorable City Council October 16, 2002 Page 4 • Payment of Fees and Deposits: Staff recommends that rentals may be approved with less than thirty (30) days' notice if facilities and staffing are available. As noted previously, a fee of $25 will be levied on all rentals with less than thirty days notice. • Facility Reservation Deposit: The reservation deposit has remained at $75 for several years. Staff recommends raising the minimum reservation deposit to $100. Also, if the entire rental fee is less than $100, the entire amount of rental would be required to confirm the reservation. • Equipment Fees: Currently, fees for phone /fax line use and the large screen TV are charged at an hourly rate. Staff recommends changing these fees to a flat rate at the current hourly rate charge, based on Group category. This would provide for a reasonable equipment use fee of from $10 to $40 per item. In addition, staff recommends eliminating the $200 deposit for the large screen TV and $50 deposit for phone line and /or sound system. A fee for portable stage use has been added at a cost of $25 per stage section. Since the City already collects a security deposit and insurance from renting parties, its felt that liability for lost equipment is already covered and will mitigate charging excessive deposits for rental use. • Additional Charges: Staff recommends raising the fee for additional facility staff and police /sheriff services from $18 per hour to actual cost + 15% per hour. Staff also suggests that the $200 mandatory fee when illegal substances or alcohol are used at an event be eliminated. The City can already retain the renter's entire $300 deposit, which would cover this fee. STAFF RECOMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002- and Resolution No. 2002 Attachments: A. Draft Resolution - Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities B. Draft Resolution - Fees for the Use of City facilities ATTACHMENT /� RESOLUTION NO. 99 1582 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE USE OF CITY FACILITIES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 94 106 99 -1582 WHEREAS, the City has developed rules and regulations that standardize and govern the use of City facilities; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 94 106' 99 -1582 (Fee Seheelulo anel Rules and Regulations For Renting of City Facilities) has been reviewed and amended to be more efficient and consistent with the intended use of City facilities; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of r4L =h 177-1999 November 6, 2002, the City Council reviewed and concurred with the amendments to the Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities; and WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No 9= !G67 99 -1582 (F-ee Sti- reelule --anel Rules and Regulations For Renting of City Facilities) shall be rescinded and replaced with the Resolution herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Sihedule and Facilities) is herein. City Council Resolution No. 9 106 99 -1582 (Fee Rules and Regulations For Renting of City hereby rescinded and replaced with the Resolution SECTION 2. POLICY. The general policies of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities shall read as follows: Section 2.1 Purpose C Q13 j_9a. Resolution No. 99 15822002 - Page 2 The purpose of these regulations is to provide rules to govern the use of the Moorpark Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. This shall be done without regard to race, religion, sex or economic status. Section 2.2 Facility Administration The Department of Community Services oversees the administration of the Moorpark Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. Section 2.3 Use Priorit Reservations for facility use can not be taken over the telephone. All facility rooms may be rented for public use when such use shall not interrupt City business. Use of the Moorpark Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center is primarily intended for the residents of the City of Moorpark and City based non - profit service organizations for use through City or community programs and private rentals. However, other businesses, aftd organizations, nen residents may rent the facility on a space available basis. Section 2.4 Use Restrictions The City may cancel or deny the use agreement of any person, group, organization or association when it is determined by the City Council, the City Manager or his /her duly authorized designee that the proposed use of the facility will not be in the best interest of the City. Facility user(s) not abiding by the rules and regulations contained herein may be suspended from use of the facility and all fees and deposits paid, forfeited. Also, future use of City facilities may be denied. SECTION 3. FACILITY RENTAL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS. The facility rental group classifications shall read as follows: Section 3.1 Purpose The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the Facility Rental Group Classifications shall be to provide directory guidelines for staff and the public relating to Resolution No. 9°22002 -_ Page 3 the classification of groups and individuals renting City facilities. City sponsored programs shall have priority use over all reservation requests. Section 3.2 Group Classification Definitions GROUP 1 City sponsored programs or co- sponsored programs. GROUP 2 Residents of the City of Moorpark and organizations that are tax exempt under Section 501(C)(3) of the U.S. Revenue Code chartered within the City limits of the City of Moorpark, and other qualifying non - profit organizations. This includes such uses as recreation /youth serving organizations, Homeowners Association meetings and political fund - raisers for the City of Moorpark elections or other political offices where the candidate is a City resident. Other governmental agencies (the County, School District, for example), and their commissions, boards or departments. GROUP 3 Residents of the Moorpark Unified School District boundaries that reside outside of the City limits; ee ve red -und-e r G r e up 2. GROUP 4 City of Moorpark organizations and izations. businesses and for profit non -City non - profit organ -- GROUP 5 Non City businesses and -rity Tes de its. SECTION 4. RENTAL APPLICATION. The general policies governing rental applications shall read as follows: Section 4.1 Terms of Rental The Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center are available for the reservation and use of individuals or groups subject to the issuance of a permit and payment of fees. All applications must be signed by an adult (21 years of age or older) who shall agree to be responsible for said use, meet all conditions required and pay all fees as required. Permits are immediately revocable if false CC) 3196 Resolution No. 99 15822002 -_ Page 4 statements are made in reserving a facility or if an individual(s) or group(s) willfully violates any rule or regulation established by the City. Fees shall be retained in the event the activity is terminated due to the violation of any rule or regulation, or the falsification of the application. Fees be icetained in the event the Rental of the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center Gymnasium is restricted to those activities designed to be held in a gymnasium as determined by the Director of Community Services. yeuth speits erqanizatTens based in the -Gity e-f r previeled these Eesei=vatiens de net eenfliet with . The Director of Community Services may promulgate other rules and regulations pertaining to the gymnasium, so long as they are consistent with these adopted Rules and Regulations and are published in writing. Section 4.2 Application T� Period Applications for the use of Moorpark Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center may be maele submitted up to 6 (six) months prior to the event. Applications for use submitted any earlier must be approved by the Director of Community Services or his /her designated representative. A deposit as identified in the fee structure is required to secure the reservation. The deposit will be applied toward use fees, which must be paid in full thirty (30) calendar days prior to the rental date. All requests are handled on a first come, first served basis. An application for use must be made at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the day of intended use. Requests received less than thirty (30) calendar days may be considered by the Director of Community Services, or his /her designated representative. A An additional fee ffi&y will be levied on rentals providing less than -14 If diateen) 30 (thirty) calendar days notice. j��_9 �( Resolution No. 99 15822002- Page 5 Section 4.3 Rental Cancellations Any group or individual finding it necessary to cancel a reservation must do so in writing to the Community Services Department at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the reservation date. Cancellations with thirty (30) calendar days or more notice are refunded all fees paid, less the cancellation fee as specified in the Facility Fee Resolution. A cancellation with less than thirty (30) calendar days notice will be refunded in full, less additional cancellation fees as specified in the Facility Fee Resolution. Section 4.4 Approval of Application The Community Services Director or his /her designated representative will have the authority to approve applications in accordance with the policies contained herein. Rentals are not confirmed until the application has been approved in writing by authorized staff. Section 4.5 Suspension From Use Facility users) not abiding by the rules and regulations contained herein or providing false information may be suspended from use of the facility and all fees and deposits paid, may be fee -fe;te retained by the City. Also, future use of City facilities may be denied. Section 4.6 Security Deposits Security Deposits are required, in the amounts specified in the Facility Fee Schedule, for all rentals. At the Community Services Director's discretion, security deposits may be waived when rental attendance is less than 50 and categorized as a meeting. Section 4.67 Liability C Q�) j- 9 8 Resolution No. 90 15822002- Page 6 All persons to whom use permits are granted must agree in writing to hold the City harmless and indemnify City from any and all liability for injury to persons or property occurring as the result of the activity sponsored by the renting party, and said person shall be liable to the City for any and all damages, to parks, equipment, and buildings owned or controlled by the City, which result from the activity or are caused by any participant in said activity. The City shall approve the form of the Indemnification and Hold Harmless. A person exercising any of the privileges authorized by this policy does so at his /her own risk without liability on the part of the City of Moorpark for any injury to persons or property resulting therefrom. Additionally, the renting party must pee purchase liability insurance coverage through the City's provider for their event with limits of bodily injury and property damage of not less than $500,000, and $1,000,000 when alcohol is served at the Community Center. Businesses and non - profit organizations may provide their own insurance coverage in the same amount, with the City of Moorpark named as additionally insured. An endoinsefftent —ez insu3Fanee required prier- te the i=ental. Insurance documentation including certificate of liability insurance and endorsement naming City as additional insured must be provided to the City prior to rental date. SECTION 5. TERMS OF USE. The general terms of use for City facilities shall read as follows: Section 5.1 Hours Facilities are available for rental seven days a week from 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight. There is a two -hour minimum rental time. A waiver of the two -hour minimum can be considered. All rentals serving alcohol (Community Center only) will be limited to a maximum 5 -hour rental time for the entire event When renting the kitchen in conjunction with a room rental the hours of both rooms must coincide. X15' x 99 Resolution No. 9°15822002- Page 7 Section 5.2 Keys Keys to the facility will not be issued under any circumstances. Staffing will be available during use to accommodate any access needs by groups. Section 5.3 Opening and Closing Procedures The Community Services staff or their designated representatives will be responsible for opening and closing for all rentals. The renting party should check the area rented with the assigned City staff person and note any previous unusual damage prior to the use. Section 5.4 Set Up The City shall set up the facility for each event based upon a diagram provided by the renting party. flat fate e a-eulate d —en the size —e f the —gee elassifieatien is ehargwirer setup. Set up diagrams shall be provided to the City no less than five (5) calendar days prior to the event. A fee shall be charged for set up as specified in the Facility Fee Resolution. Section 5.5 Decorations All decorations must be approved by the City and must comply with Section 13 - 143 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California as to flame proofing. -,ate deeei=atiens - and faat�le--.- The City shall also pre- approve location and method of installation. The room may be decorated prior to the rental time if there is no rental conflict, the activity takes place during the facility's regularly open hours and staff is on duty. Otherwise, decoration timesheud will be included in the rental time. Section 5.6 Clean Up The City shall be responsible for minimal clean up and take dewn removal of tables and chairs in the facility after the event, but should not exceed one hour, except for the kitchen, which will be the responsibility of the renting party, excluding the kitchen floor. If clean up exceeds one -hour, additional labor time will be deducted from the C U3200 Resolution No. 09 15822002 -_ Page 8 security/elean p deposit at a rate of no less than the City's direct cost as identified in the applicable fee schedule. Also, the renting party should inspect the area with the assigned City staff person after the event for damage-& or misuse. The Director of Community Services shall make the final decision .,hetheic on what portion of the security/elean deposit will be returned. Section 5.7 Use of City Equipment Tables, chairs and other City property may be made available to individuals renting City facilities. This equipment is for use inside the facility only. and sh l- net be taken eutside. The renting party is subject to an equipment use and set up fee and is responsible for the condition of the City equipment at the end of the rental. Damage to City equipment will result in a deduction from the security deposit consistent with the replacement costs of the equipment. Tables and chairs or other City property shall not be rented or loaned out for any purpose other than City sponsored events or used except as part of an approved use of the Moorpark Community Center and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. Section 5.8 Responsibility for Damages to the Facility and Equipment The use of cellophane tape, adhesive tape, nails, staples, screws, etc. on tables, chairs, walls, lights or other facilities is not permitted. Masking tape may be used on paneling and tables only and must be removed immediately following its use. Glitter, confetti and similar substances are not permitted. If the facility or any portion thereof, or any equipment shall be damaged, marred or defaced by the act, default or negligence of the renting party, his /her employee or employees, patron, guests or any person admitted to the facility by the renting party, the renting party will pay to the City from the e' can ng ldafft ge security deposit such sums as the City shall determine to be necessary to restore the facility or such equipment to its condition prior to such damage. Should charges exceed the amount on deposit, the renting party shall be billed for the difference and allowed thirty (30) calendar days in which to make payment. Resolution No. 99 5822002 - Page 9 SECTION 6. PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES. Prohibited and restricted activities shall be handled as follows: Section 6.1 Smoking Smoking is prohibited in all rooms of the Community Center, and Arroyo Vista Recreation Center, at all times. Section 6.2 Alcoholic Beverages Consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited at the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. Possession and /or consumption of alcoholic beverages is permitted at the Moorpark Community Center, subject to the following conditions: A. Maximum rental time for all events servi alcohol may not exceed five (5) hours. A-B. Dispensing, consumption and /or possession of alcoholic beverages are allowed in the Moorpark Community Center Citrus Room, Apricot Room, kitchen, and front patio areas only. Alcoholic beverages are not allowed in the parking lot. �B-. C. A State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control permit shall be required when alcoholic beverages are to be sold. Said permit shall be secured by the applicant, and a copy provided to the Moorpark Community Services Department no less than five (5) calendar days prior to the scheduled date of event. Failure to do so will constitute cancellation of event and forfeiture of rental fees previously paid. C-.-D. Alcoholic beverages shall not be sold or served one (1) hour prior to closing time of event. -).E. The sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages may occur during operating hours only if the function will not disrupt or conflict with the general programming of the Center. Resolution No. °C=2002 -_ Page 10 -E-F. The renting party shall provide two security guards, to —be him from the time alcohol is served until all guests have vacated City property. PiFeef t gee— have been event. The applicant shall pay for all costs related to providing security guards to the security company in advance of the event. A copy of the security guard contract and proof of payment shall be provided to the Community Service Department no less than ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled event. Failure to do so will constitute cancellation of event and forfeiture of rental fees previously paid. This cost is in addition to any other facility use fees and deposits. -F--.G. The renting party must pr-eviele purchase liability insurance coverage through the City's provider for their event with limits of bodily injury and property damage with a eeL=tifiiat -ef tea= ranee it the F eut of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) when alcohol is served at Moorpark Community Center. Businesses and non- profit organizations may provide their own insurance coverage in the same amount, with the City of Moorpark named as additional insured. Insurance documentation including certificate of liability insurance and endorsement naming City as additional insured must be provided to the Citv prior to rental date. Section 6.3 Open Flame Devices and Fog Machines All open flame devices and fog machines are prohibited in all City t-e facilit -yies. The Community Services Department shall approve all closed flame devices before use is permitted. (Title 19; Article 6; Section 624 of the California State Administrative Code). Section 6.4 Amplified Sound Systems P-ercit. Persons using sound amplification equipment shall keep the sound level of such equipment at a reasonable C �Jj2o 0`1 Resolution No. °°22002- Page 11 level to avoid disturbing determination of a reasonable judgement of the City employee o n Department, and all instructions complied with immediately. Section 6.5 Gambling nearby residents. The sound level shall be the duty and /or the Sheriff's of such persons shall be Gambling is prohibited. wit-heut :L-he v of t::c e�i-e� -crppi v v u � v City Geaneir This includes any game of skill or chance played with cards, dice or any other device for money, checks, credit or any other representative item of value. Section 6.6 Arroyo Vista Gymnasium Restrictions Only soft or rubber soled shoes may be worn on the gymnasium wood floor. The zreeter —ems ez ffii ty Sery c the gyfftnasiaffl, se leng as they are eensistent with these adepted Rules and Regulatiens and are published in writing. SECTION 7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES. Special circumstances to facility rentals shall be handled as follows: Section 7.1 Right of Appeal A permittee has the right to appeal the decision by City staff to revoke a permit, levy additional charges and /or deduct a portion of a deposit. An appeal must be filed in writing to the City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue within five (5) calendar days of receiving your notification. The City Manager or his /her designee will affirm or deny the appeal in five (5) calendar days. Any further appeal must be made in writing to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days upon notification of the decision on the appeal. Such appeal shall be considered within thirty (30) calendar days. In the event of an appeal of an administrative decision regarding use or policy, the appeal shall be filed in writing, clearly stating the reason(s) therefore, and shall be processed as follows until resolved by: t Q co 2 11- Resolution No. °°i2002- Page 12 1. Community Services Director - decision appealed to; 2. City Manager - decision appealed to; 3. City Council - decision shall be final. No appeal will be valid until it has been submitted and considered in the above listed order. Section 7.2 Suspension of the Rules The Community Services Department administers the use of the facilities. For good cause, rules contained herein may be temporarily suspended and /or modified by the Director of Community Services as deemed necessary. Section 7.3 Complaints Forward your concerns in writing to: City of Moorpark Community Services Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attention: Director of Community Services SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th 6th day of Maker, 19959 November, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Resolution No. 99 15822002- Page 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 09 1582 02- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 17th 6th day of Hare h, -1944 November, 2002 and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans Mikos, Harper, Redgers Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this -1-9 6th day of May, ° November, 2002. Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk (seal) C 0U 2106 ATTACHMENT,J�. RESOLUTION NO. 9915883 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED FEES FOR THE USE OF CITY FACILITIES & RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 99 -1583 WHEREAS, the City has adopted a schedule of fees for the rental of the Moorpark Community Center and the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of M�h - 1�T999 November 6, 2002, the City Council reviewed and concurred with the amendments to the Rules and Regulations Governing the Use of City Facilities; and WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No 94!G6q 99- 1583(Fee Schedule and Rules and Regulations For City Facilities) shall be rescinded and replaced with the Resolution herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. City Council Resolution No. 94 106te 99 -1583 (Fee Schedule and Rules and Regulations for City Facilities) is hereby rescinded and replaced with the Resolution herein. SECTION 2. FEES AND CHARGES. Fees and charges for the use of City facilities shall be as follows: Section 2.1 Purpose The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the Facility Rental /Use Fee Schedule shall be to provide directory guidelines for staff and the public relating to the fees and deposits required to rent City facilities and amenities. The City shall reserve the right to make adjustments or impose additional fees on a case -by -case basis. W 20 "s' Resolution No. 99 X532-2002 - Page 2 Section 2.2 Payment of Fees, Reservation Deposits, Security Deposits, and Cancellation Fees All rental fees and balance of required deposits must be paid thirty (30) days prior to use of the facility. Reservations will be made and confirmed only to individuals aged twenty -one (21) years or older. A reservation deposit (as identified in Section 2.3: h dept -ed fee sehe`'u' -e) is required to secure a reservation. The deposit will be applied toward use fees, which must be paid in full thirty (30) days prior to the rental date. A security deposit is also required 30 days prior to rental (as identified in Section 2.5). The City reserves the right to retain the entire security deposit in the event alcohol or drugs are brought to a rental of the Recreation Center or Community Center (unless an Alcohol Permit has been obtained). Any group or individual finding it necessary to cancel a reservation must do so in writing to the Community Services Department at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the reservation date. Cancellations with 30 days notice or more are refunded all fees paid, less a $10 cancellation fee. A cancellation with less than 30 (thirty) days notice will be refunded in full, less a $25 cancellation fee. Rentals may be approved with less than thirty (30) days' notice if facilities and staffing are available. A fee of $25 ffia7y will be levied on rentals providing less than 44 (men) 30 (thirty) days' notice. Section 2.3 Facility Reservation Deposit A minimum deposit of 4-7-5 $100 is required to confirm a reservation, unless the entire rental fee is less than $100, and in which case the entire amount of rental is required to confirm the reservation. This amount is applied to the total rental cost. All i=en al fees azTel balanee of use ef the faeili-t-�. Resolution No. 99 15832-2002- Page 3 Section 2.4 Facility Use Fees A. Meeting Room Use Fee - AVRC Multi Purpose and Dance rooms and Community Center Apricot and Citrus rooms (Calculated hourly based on number of persons attending) Group 1: Group 2: 1 -50 51 -100 101 -150 151 -200 200+ Group 3: 1 -50 51 -100 101 -150 151 -200 200+ Group 4: 1 -50 51 -100 101 -150 151 -200 200+ Group 5: 1 -50 51 -100 101 -150 151 -200 200+ B. Set Up and Use calculated based Group 1: Groups 2 -5: 1 -50 51 -100 101 -200 200+ No Charge $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 Fee (tee ±ciFfte fee flat rate on number of persons attending) No Charge $24 $30 $40 $50 Resolution No. "" 15832-2002- Page 5 Group 3: $20 Group 4: $30 Group 5: $40 F. Phone /Fax Lii rate.) Group 1: Group 2: Group 3: Group 4: Group 5: ze Use Fee (Gaieidiated he r'y flat No Charge $10 $20 $30 $40 G. Large Screen TV Use Fee - AVRC (Galeulated h ^"r,'y flat rate in conjunction with a meeting room rental. 200 dd t a deposit) Group 1: No Charge Group 2: $10 Group 3: $20 Group 4: $30 Group 5: $40 H. Mats (each): $5 I Podium: $5 J. Sound System: $25 K. Staqe - AVRC: $25 per section L. Direct Cost Fees (Calculated hourly for clean up and after hours rentals. This charge is in addition to hourly room fee.) Group 1: No Charge Group 2: $18 Group 3: $18 Group 4: $20 Group 5: $20 Section 2.5 Security Deposits A. Facility Damage /C-Ia- n� Security Deposit Without Alcohol: $300 c "j� )21 Resolution No. 99 15832-2002 - Page 6 B. Facility Damage/Gleaiq Security Deposit With Alcohol: $450 C. Arroyo Vista Gymnasium Damage /Clean Up Security Deposit: $500 Refunds of deposits are contingent upon meeting all the requirements for the rental of the facility. Any amount remaining in the deposit following the payment of all charges shall be refunded to the person listed on the application within thirty (30) calendar days. Section 2.6 Additional Charges Additional charges will be levied over the basic rate under the following conditions: A. When staff is needed for additional set up, breakdown or cleanup beyond normal time requirements a fee of no less than $18 per hour will be assessed; B. When additional staff is needed for facility control (such as charges for police /sheriff's services, if needed) a fee of no less than 4-1-9 actual cost + 15% per hour will be assessed; C. When facility is damaged and /or liability insurance fees are required the renting party is responsible for these fees; D. When alcohol is being served or sold (only at Moorpark Community Center) an additional permit is required; Resolution No. 90- 583-2002- Page 7 er 4ised at an event en—C- e-f — the — rcrri- ccT- ag:F-e-em , -a $200 fftanda:t-ery—fee Fftay lee e ,a . The Director of Community Services or his /her designated representative shall make the determination of requirements for additional personnel and associated charges. Section 2.7 Refunds Refunds of deposits are contingent upon meeting all the requirements for the rental of the facility. Any amount remaining in the deposit following the payment of all charges shall be refunded to the person listed on the applieatien rental permit within thirty (30) calendar days. In the event of a cancellation, notice is required in writing to the Community Services Department at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the reservation date. All deposits paid will be refunded less a $10 cancellation fee. A cancellation with less than 30 (thirty) days notice will be refunded less a $25 cancellation fee. Section 2.8 Non - Profit Organization Special Use A. A City of Moorpark non - profit organization may request a special -rate rental for a fund - raising event. The special rate for this rental is $25 per hour, per Lceeffi, whieh is based en the Gd::�yls ea; i=eem est=s for use of the Multi - Purpose Room, Kitchen, and Activity Room. This special rate is limited to one rental per fiscal year per organization. All requests should include a copy of the organization's non - profit statement showing non - profit status and number as well as the name of the organization, purpose of the gathering, expected attendance, and requested facility, time and date. All requests will be considered on a case by case and a first - come /first- served basis and depend upon facility availability. A deposit must be made and all other City restrictions and regulations apply. Rentals taking place during hours when the facility is closed may be charged an additional 1 Resolution No. 9915832-2002- Page 8 fee depe -sue (as identified in the adopted fee schedule) to cover staff costs. Non - profit organizations as applied herein shall mean those groups and organizations that qualify under U.S. Tax Code 501(c)(3). B City of Moorpark Youth Sports Group are eligible for a special discount rate of $15 per hour for a rental directly associated with the group's purpose, of up to 50 attendees, during normal operating hours, with no additional fees unless the group requires set -up or other special arrangements During non - business hours or when attendees exceed 50 people, the rate will be $30 per hour. Normal operating hours at the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center are defined as 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sunday. Normal operating hours at the Community Center are defined as 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1-: 6th day of Ha=eh, 1999 November ?nn ?_ Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Resolution No. 99 15832-2002- Page 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 99 1583 2002- was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 34-t-" 6th day of H h, 1944 November, 2002, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers £ins Mikos, Harper, Reelgera Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 6th day of May :99- November, 2002. Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk (seal)