Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AG RPTS 2002 1204 CC REG
Resolution No. 2002 -2033 Ordinance No. 291 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2002 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Communitv Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Consider City Council Resolution Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November 5, 2002, and Declaring the Election Results and Such Other Matters as Required by Law. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) B. City Presentation to Councilmember Wozniak. C. Comments from Councilmember Wozniak. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 2 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: (Continued) D. City Clerk administers the Oath of Office to Councilmember Clint Harper. E. City Clerk administers the Oath of Office to Councilmember elect Janice Parvin. F. City Clerk administers the Oath of Office to Mayor Patrick Hunter. G. Comments from Councilmember Harper. H. Comments from Councilmember Parvin. I. Comments from Mayor Hunter. J. Consider Nomination and Selection of Mayor Pro Tempore. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL RECESS FOR A RECEPTION. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING, UNLESS CANCELED.) 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.8, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Re- Allocating Proceeds from Sale of 6479 -B Penn Street (Community Block Grant Funds). (Continued with public hearing open from November 20, 2002, meeting.) Staff Recommendation: 1) Receive public testimony; and 2) Direct staff as deemed appropriate. (Staff: Nancy Burns) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) B. Consider Use of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) Grant Funds for 2002/03 Fiscal Year. (Continued with public hearing open from November 20, 2002, meeting.) Staff Recommendation: 1) Conduct public hearing; and 2) Approve revised SLES expenditure plan. (Staff: Steven Kueny) C. Consider Minor Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development 99 -01 and 99 -02 to Modify Condition No. 5 of City Council Resolution No. 99- 1658, Requesting Extension of Time to June 6, 2004, for "Use Inauguration" of Project Located on Lots 15 and 16 of Tract No. 3492 at the Northeast Corner of Condor Drive and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Calabasas BCD, Inc. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Minor Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development No. 99 -01 and 99 -02, amending Conditions of Approval. (Staff: Barry Hogan) 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Presentation by Starett Kressman, Ventura Countv Libraries. B. Consider Appointments to the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Appoint five (5) Planning Commissioners to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) C. Consider Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Staff Recommendation: Appoint five (5) Parks and Recreation Commissioners to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) D. Consider Appointments to the Senior Center Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation: Appoint five (5) Senior Center Advisory Committee members to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 4 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (Continued) E. Consider Appointments to the Public Art Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation: Appoint two (2) public representatives to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) F. Consider Appointments to the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation: Appoint two (2) representatives and one (1) alternate to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) G. Consider Appointments to the Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation: Appoint one (1) representative to serve a four -year term ending January 2007. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) H. Consider Adopting Revised City Council Policies Resolution and Rescinding Resolution No. 2001 -1926. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) I. Consider City Council Standing and Ad Hoc Committee Appointments and Other City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Committee Assignments. Staff Recommendation: Determine City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency committee appointments and assignments. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) J. Consider Appointment of a City Council Ad Hoc Committee for the North Park Village Project Development Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Appoint a North Park Village Project Ad Hoc Committee. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of August 21, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 2, 2002. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 5 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) Consider Approval of Minutes of Adjourned Meeting of October 17, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of November 6, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes as processed B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - December 4, 2002. Manual Warrants 111225 - 111227 & $ 262,412.40 Voided Warrant 110901 & 110930 $ (46,778.76) 110978 & 111085 & 111295 Payroll Liability 111217 - 111224 $ 12,630.17 Warrants Regular Warrants 111228 - 111291 & $ 15,486.12 111292 - 111311 $ 240,771.48 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider Cancellation of January 1, 2003, Regular Meeting. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to post a notice of meeting cancellation for the January 1, 2003, meeting. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) D. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the 2002 Curb Ramp Project. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project, and 2) Authorized staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 6 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) E. Consider Revised Budget for 3rd of July Fireworks Event, and Adoption of a Budget Amendment. Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , amending the FY 02/03 budget by appropriating an additional $11,000 from the General Fund Reserve Balance for the July 3rd Event; and 2) Approve the $2.00 per person entrance fee for individuals over the age of 5 years old for the July 3, 2003 Event. (Staff: John Hartnett) ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED F. Consider Request for Proposal for Older Americans Act Grant Funds for Senior Center Health and Wellness Programs. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- 1 approving and authorizing this grant application through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging to secure funds for health and wellness screenings at the Moorpark Senior Center. (Staff: John Hartnett) G. Consider Adoption of a Resolution for FY 02/03 Budget Amendment for the Senior Center New Year's Event. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , amending the FY 02/03 budget by allocating $300 from the Senior Trust Fund (1000.2612) for the Senior Center New Year's event. (Staff: John Hartnett) ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED 11. ORDINANCES: 12. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 7 12. CLOSED SESSION: (Continued) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited Partnership and Messenger Investment Company, Inc., a California Corporation vs. The City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO23388) F. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 050 -270, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Colin Velazquez Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment G. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 050 -080, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Monte Louis Abbath Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment H. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 090 -250, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Margaret Irene Gisler Cullen Trust Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Regular City Council Meeting Agenda December 4, 2002 Page 8 12. CLOSED SESSION: (Continued) I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Administrative Services Director, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, and Public Works Director. 13. ADJOURNMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II). ITEM `�• A MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 22, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider City Council Resolution Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November 5, 2002, and Declaring the Election Results and Such Other Matters as Required by Law BACKGROUND The City of Moorpark General Municipal Election was held on November 5, 2002. The City Council by adoption of Resolution No. 2002 -1985 requested that the County Board of Supervisors consolidate the City's General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election. City Council Resolution No. 2002 -1986 authorized the Board of Supervisors to direct the County Clerk to canvass the election returns of the City's General Municipal Election. DISCUSSION The County Clerk has completed the canvass of the election returns, and the County Clerk's certification of the election results is included as an exhibit to the attached draft City Council resolution. Section 10262 of the Elections Code requires that upon the completion of the canvass and before installing the new officers, the governing body of the city shall pass a resolution reciting the fact of the election and such other matters as are enumerated in Section 10264. Section 10264 requires that as soon as the result of the election is declared, the elections official of the governing body shall enter on its records a statement of the result, which must show: (a) The whole number of votes cast in the city. (b) The names of the persons voted for. (c) The measures voted upon. (d) For what office each person was voted for. (e) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person and for and against each measure. (f) The number of votes given in the city to each person and for and against each measure. 0000011. Honorable City Council December 4, 2002, Regular Meeting Page 2 Section 10265 of the Elections Code requires that the elections official shall immediately sign and deliver to each person elected a certificate of election. The elections official is also required to administer to each person elected the oath of office prescribed in the California Constitution. The certificate of election and the oath requirements will be accomplished at the December 4 meeting. The attached resolution recites the fact of Election held on November 5, 2002, and results and such other matters as required STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002- the General Municipal declares the election by law. Attachment: City Council Draft Resolution including Exhibit A (Certificate of the County Clerk, Statement of Votes by Precinct, and Official Summary Report) 0010002 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2002, AND DECLARING THE ELECTION RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Moorpark, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was duly and regularly given in time, form and manner as provided by law, voting precincts were properly established, election officers were appointed, and in all respects, the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the Elections Code of the State of California for holding of elections in cities; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2002 -1986, adopted June 19, 2002, the County Clerk of Ventura canvassed the returns of the General Municipal Election held for the purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two years and electing two (2) Members of the City Council for full terms of four years; and the County Clerk has certified the results to this City Council and the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the name of the person voted for at the General Municipal Election for Mayor for the full term of two years is as follows: Patrick Hunter That the names of persons voted for at the General Municipal Election for two Members of the City Council for the full term of four years are as follows: Clint Harper Janice S. Parvin Bernardo M. Perez ()0 () () e:w Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 SECTION 2. That the whole number of precinct votes cast in the City was 5,731 and the whole number of absentee voter ballots cast was 2,093, making a total of 7,824 ballots cast at the Moorpark General Municipal Election. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each such person named for the office for which the persons were candidates is as listed in Exhibit A, attached. The City Council does declare and determine that: Patrick Hunter was elected as Mayor of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, for a full two -year term; and Clint Harper and Janice S. Parvin were elected as Members of the City Council, each for a full four -year term. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and shall enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Certificate of the County Clerk Statement of Votes by Precinct Official Summary Report 000004 CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK (Elections Code Sections 15372 and 10264) CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF VENTURA ) I, RICHARD D. DEAN, County Clerk of the County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the Votes Cast for the office of Mayor and the two offices of Member of the City Council for the CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION consolidated with the Gubernatorial General Election held on November 5, 2002. I further certify that the total ballots cast at the City of Moorpark General Municipal Election are as follows: PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL BALLOTS CAST BALLOTS CAST BALLOTS CAST 5,731 2,093 7,824 I further certify that the total votes cast for the office of Mayor and the two offices of Member of the City Council are as follows: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this 22nd day of November, 2002. RICHARD D. DEAN County Clerk and Recorder County of Ventura PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL MAYOR VOTE VOTE VOTE PATRICK HUNTER 4,589 1,689 6,278 MEMBER OF THE PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL CITY COUNCIL VOTE VOTE VOTE CLINT HARPER 3,072 1,227 4,299 JANICE S. PARVIN 2,451 948 3,399 BERNARDO M. PEREZ 2,386 830 3,216 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this 22nd day of November, 2002. RICHARD D. DEAN County Clerk and Recorder County of Ventura 11/18(02 475 GUBERNATORIAL GENERAL ELECTION. NOVEMBER 5. 2002 043 ** *GRAND TOTALS CITY OF MOORFARK ad M 0 M 0 0 R __ — — — -- — — — 0 P R A B F R E •: A P K R A R A N N R B K T C C A I E A R I L R c G L CV I TV I D E - I —L --- - — — I0 C YO N 0 S O TT K T T S T T T YE CE M R S U H 0 H F -A---- -- I F_ — MF U OF A F A T N AO N NO R E R I A 0 YR T i'R F R V 0 S U 0 E I E E I —N_ T- T R1 R L2 R Z N VENTURA COUNTY 16005 7824 48.9 6278 4299 3216 3399 24TH CONGRESSIONAL 16005 7824 48.9 6278 4299 3216 3399 19TH SENATORIAL 16005 7824 48.9 6278 4299 3216 3399 37TH ASSEMBLY 16005 7824 48.9 6278 4299 3216 3399 4TH SUPERVISORIAL 16005 7824 48.9 6278 4299 3216 3399 MOORPARK 16005 7824 48.9 627E 4299 3216 3399 ad 11118102 476 GUBERNATORIAL GENERAL ELECTION. NOVEMBER 5, 2002 043 ***ABSENTEE TOTALS CITY OF MOORPARK M -- 0 M 0 0 R 0 F R R F E A F iC _ R A N N R B K T r A I E A R I L R C G L .'V I TV I 6 E - - -i -- -L- - - 10 C YO N 0 0 TT K T T S T T T YE CE M R A - - S U -- R- H MF U 0 H OF A F F A T C N AO N NO R E R I A 0 YR T ('R F R V 0 S U 0 E i E E I - - -- N- - -T- T RI R L2 R z N VENTURA COUNTY 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 24TH CONGRESSIONAL 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 19TH SENATORIAL 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 37TH ASSEMBLY 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 4TH SUFERVISORIAL 16005 2093 13.1 16£9 1227 £30 94£ MOORPARK 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 1F /Ib /Ue 4// GUBERNATORIAL GENERAL. ELECTION. NOVEMBER 5. 2002 043 CITY OF MOORPARK t1 0 t1 0 0 R 0 F. R A E F R E i A F K R A R B K'' T A I E A R I L R C L CV i TV I D E _I_ ___L__ _ _._ I0 C YO N 0 S 0 TT K T T 5 T T T YE CE M R S U H 0 H F - -- -A. — -- - - R- M F U O F A F A T C N AO N NO R E R I A 0 Y'R T CR P R. V 0 S U 0 E I E E I - - -T- -- T - RI R L2 R Z N 3250- MOORPARK #401 711 248 34.9 171 350 126 227 148 186 92 166 3252- MOORPARK 402 AL 1435 450 31.4 0 0 0 3254- *MOORPARK 403. 3256- MOORPARK 404 AL -0 -- 1230 O 284 0.0 23.1 0 203 113 154 82 3258- MOORPARK #405 819 312 38.1 230 149 106 144 136 142 107 3262- MOORPARK #407 908 263 29.0 191 301 206 164 169 3264- MOORPARK 408 -A 3265- MOORPARK 408 L 907 - --- 856 372_ -.41.0 305 35.6 250 162 124 157 3266- MOORPARK #409A 815 344 42.2 284 204 211 138 137 163 154 3267- MOORPARK #409L 802 344 42.9 295 D c 0 326E- *MOORPARK 410 3270 -MRPK 411.12 06 0 1073 0 367 0.0 34.2 0 296 191 112 180 3271 -MRPK 411r12t06 1155 406 35.2 352 242 148 145 110 164 122 3274- MOORPARK #413A 828 267 32.2 218 199 142 91 95 3275- MOORPARK - #4 -13F _. 3276- MOORPARK #413L - - -704 873 - _237 319 33.7 36.5 265 188 112 140 3277-MOORPARK #4135 642 274 42.7 228 357 167 222 99 177 129 195 3278- MOORPARK 414 AF 3280- MOORPARK 414-- -L -S -- 1072 - -- 1175--- 458 48 -1 -- 42.7 -40.9 399 268 209 194 8000085 -ABS PCT 8000085 16005 2093 13.1 1689 1227 830 948 0 8000086 -ASS PCT 8000086 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 ABSENTEE TOTALS- --- - - -ib- 005 -- 2093---- -13. -1 1689 1227 4299 830 3216 948 3399 GRAND TOTALS 16005 7824 48.9 6278 ITEM Y. A . . e � -`r�-- MOORPARK CITY COUNCI ,, AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns Senior Management Analys Date: November 26, 2002 (CC Meeting of December 4, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER RE- ALLOCATING PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF 6479 -B PENN STREET (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS) BACKGROUND This hearing has been continued from previous City Council meetings in order for the Budget and Finance Committee to meet and formulate a recommendation for the reallocation of CDBG funds. The Committee will meet Monday, December 2 at which time a recommendation will be prepared and provided to the City Council on Tuesday, December 3. A copy of the original Council Agenda Report is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive public testimony 2. Direct staff as deemed appropriate Attachment: Council Agenda Report - November 6, 2002 0G10009 ITEM 9 . A . MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL 54J,VPLC�rv►nvTA-L AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst Date: December 3, 2002 (CC Meeting of December 4, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER RE- ALLOCATING PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF 6479 -B PENN STREET (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS) BACKGROUND At its November 20, 2002, Regular Meeting, the Moorpark City Council continued this item to its December 4, 2002, meeting and referred it to the Budget and Finance Committee for review. DISCUSSION In its Special Meeting of December 2, 2002, the Budget and Finance Committee met to discuss the reallocation of funds which will be added to the City's line of credit from the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street. The Committee's recommendations include the development and improvement of parks to serve low income neighborhoods, and property acquisition for the purpose of developing a dwelling unit in the downtown area for a low income household. (See Attachment "A".) Approximately $218,745 is expected to be added to the City's CDBG line of credit from the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street. Current funds in the City's line of credit total approximately $447,140. This means that the City's line of credit will soon total approximately $665,885. Staff estimates that approximately $160,535 of the current allocated funds are likely to be expended as appropriated within the current fiscal year. (See Attachment "B ".) If this expenditure level is achieved, the funds remaining will total $505,350, including $218,745 from the Penn Street property. Honorable City Council Date 12/03/02 Page 2 Developing a park to serve low income households is an eligible CDBG activity. In order to proceed with an allocation of CDBG funds for this purpose, the City will need to conduct a survey which demonstrates that the users of the park are primarily low income households. The survey methodology, questionnaire and results must be approved by HUD. HUD requires that the survey demonstrate that 51% of the total residents of the universe of park users be low income. This means that 51% of the total residents of this universe must be low income, as compared with typical survey methodology which utilizes sampling techniques (i.e., requiring 51% of the sample to be low income) . Census data at the block group level is not yet available from the 2000 Census. The public notice for this matter did not indicate that funds other than those recovered from the Penn Street purchase would be reallocated. If the Council wishes to authorize the Committee's suggested funding allocations, some funds currently allocated for projects (see Attachment "B ") will need to be re- allocated, following a noticed public hearing. The City anticipates approximately $200,000 in new CDBG funds for FY 2003/2004. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing and take public testimony; and 2. Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Attachments: Attachment "A" Budget and Finance Committee Recommendations Attachment "B" Anticipated CDBG Expenditures and Funds Remaining Afterward Honorable City Council Date 12/03/02 Page 3 Attachment "A" Budget and Finance Committee Recommendations Activity Address Estimated Cost Comments Park development in low income neighborhood 296 Charles St. Land acquisition and demolition of structure $175,000 Equipment $50,000 Park improvements Virginia Colony Park $100,000 Property acquisition To be determined $275,000 Development of dwelling in Downtown area Honorable City Council Date 12/03/02 Page 4 Attachment "B" Anticipated CDBG Expenditures and Funds Remaining Afterward Project /Program Anticipated Expenditures Funds Remaining After Anticipated Expenditures Affordable Housing $0 $49,710 Street Lights (Downtown Residential) $75,000 $71,876 Public Park $0 $143,400 Boys & Girls Club Re- Roofing Project $20,000 $0 Code Enforcement $10,000 $10,999 RAIN $5,000 $0 Catholic Charities $8,535 $0 Senior Nutrition $10,000 $0 Senior Center Operations $12,000 $0 Senior Survivalmobile $0 $1,000 Administration $20,000 $9,620 Total $160,535 $286,605 ' C' MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst U i Date: October 29, 2002 (CC Meeting of November 6, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER RE- ALLOCATING PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF 6479 -B PENN STREET (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS) BACKGROUND At its October 2, 2002, Regular Meeting, the Moorpark City Council approved Resolution No. 2002 -2011, authorizing the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street. The unit has been sold, and escrow is expected to close November 8, 2002. Public notice of this matter has been published, as required by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations. DISCUSSION Funds from the proceeds of this sale may be re- allocated to any eligible Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project. If the Council wishes to utilize the proceeds for Affordable Housing, the funds may be designated for that purpose, with a specific project to be identified at a later date. If CDBG funds are used for property acquisition or for a loan to enable a developer to purchase land, and affordable dwelling units are constructed on the property, the CDBG funds could be rolled over into deferred payment mortgages ( "Silent Second Mortgages "). These Silent Second Mortgages, in favor of the City, would thereby provide partial funding for the down payments needed for the affordable units. The funds would eventually be returned to the City, per resale restrictions developed by the City. '010010 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 2 It is possible that prevailing wages might be required for a project with this type of assistance. However, staff believes that recently enacted legislation .(SB 972) may provide an exemption for this type of assistance, providing that all assistance is structured as a loan and not a grant. If Council desires to provide CDBG funds as assistance for Affordable Housing, this form of assistance would help the largest number of low income buyers. Staff recommends that the assistance per buyer be limited to twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) per household. Additional funds from other sources (developer contribution or public funds such as Housing Setaside) could be utilized to supplement CDBG. All public funding needs to be structured as a loan to qualify for the exemption referenced above. It is unclear at this time whether the sale of 6479 -B Penn Street will add approximately two hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($217,000) or two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the City's CDBG allocation of funds. The difference of thirty -three thousand dollars ($33,000) represents the gain on the sale of the property, over the purchase price and costs of the purchase transaction, plus the closing costs for the sale transaction. The City is awaiting a determination by HUD as to the disposition of the $33,000 in question (Attachment "A "). As shown on Attachment "B ", the City's unexpended funds currently total approximately $447,140. HUD regulations limit the unexpended funds in the City's line of credit to one and one half (1%) times the annual allocation, which is approximately two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000). This means that the City should carry no more than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) in its unexpended line of credit. When escrow closes on the subject property, the City's CDBG allocation will be increased by either $217,000 or $250,000, for a total line of credit of either six hundred sixty -four thousand one hundred forty dollars ($664,140) or six hundred ninety -seven thousand one hundred forty dollars ($697,140). Council action on the re- allocation of $250,000 is requested at this time. This will avoid the need to bring this item before the Council again, in the event that a funding decision is made 0106-®11 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 3 for $217,000 and the City receives a favorable decision from HUD for the remaining $33,000 in question. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue this item to the City Council meeting of November 20, 2002; and 2. Refer the matter to the Budget and Finance Committee for consideration prior to the Council meeting of November 20, 2002. Attachment "A ": 6479 -B Penn Street Transaction Costs Attachment "B ": Unexpended Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds ®000121 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 4 Attachment "A" 6479 -B Penn Street Transaction Costs Item Purchase Transaction Sale Transaction Sales Price $217,000 $250,000 Closing Costs $1,745 (Estimated) $16,402 Net Gain (Estimated) $14,853 Honorable City Council Date 10/31/02 Page 5 Attachment "B" Unexpended Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds October 29, 2002 Project /Program Funds Available Affordable Housing $49,710 Street Lights (Downtown Residential) $146,876 Public Park $143,400 Boys & Girls Club Re- Roofing Project $20,000 Code Enforcement $20,999 RAIN $5,000 Catholic Charities $8,535 Senior Nutrition $10,000 Senior Center Operations $12,000 Senior Survivalmobile $1,000 Administration $29,620 Total $447,140 000014 , ITEM _- 8. 3 . AC.,_ MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst(/` , DATE: November 22, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/04/02) SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (SLES) GRANT FUNDS FOR 2002/03 FISCAL YEAR (Continued with public hearing open from November 20, 20021 meeting) BACKGROUND Every year since 1996, the State of California has provided Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) grants to cities and counties. This money must be used for front -line law enforcement as determined by the City Council during a public hearing held each year. In the past, the City of Moorpark has received and used these funds as follows: 1996/97 $64,578 Motorcycle, computer upgrades, video cameras, miscellaneous 1997/98 $65,320 Administrative Assistant position, vehicle expenses, video surveillance camera, night vision binoculars, portable generator, FAX broadcast system, computer upgrades 1998/99 $50,334 Administrative Assistant position 1999/00 $65,730 Administrative Assistant position, laptop computer 2000/01 $100,000 Administrative Assistant position, two vehicles (High School Resource Officer and detective bureau) 2001/02 $100,000 Administrative Assistant position, '-� 40 -hour patrol officer position, mini -van maintenance In some years, the City did not spend all the SLES funds. This unspent money, along with interest earnings in the account, resulted in a balance of $17,508 on June 30, 2002. G(11 00:1 Honorable City Council November 22, 2002 Page 2 DISCUSSION The State budget includes a minimum of $100,000 in SLES funds for each jurisdiction in 2002/03. This $100,000 allocation, along with the balance of $17,508 already available in the account, means that $117,508 is available for the 2002/03 fiscal year. As the new revenue amounts were not known at the time the budget was adopted, the City's Adopted Fiscal Year 2002/03 Operating Budget includes $120,058 in expenditures from SLES funds, an overage of $2,550. Due to staffing changes at the police department, staff recommends a revised SLES expenditure plan. Full Funding for Administrative Assistant through October 2002. This position was created in 1997 to reduce the number of administrative tasks performed by sworn personnel, allowing more time for front -line duties. ' The adopted budget funds this position with $69,921 of SLES money. Last month, the position became vacant, and staff recommends that it be eliminated. As you will recall, a Records Clerk position has been deployed by the County at the Moorpark Station as part of the contingent of deputies serving a portion of the unincorporated area stationed in Moorpark. The cost of the position from July through October is $22,237, resulting in a savings of $47,684. Partial Funding for 40 -hour Patrol Officer. This position was added in 2001 to enhance front -line law enforcement. For 2002/03, the cost of this patrol officer is expected to be $134,748. The adopted budget funds this position with $50,137 of SLES money and $84,611 of general funds. Staff recommends using $95,271 of SLES money (the adopted SLES budget plus salary savings from the Administrative Assistant minus the overage) and $39,477 of general funds. In summary, $117,508 of SLES money would be spent in the 2002/03 fiscal year as follows: A budget amendment will not be required. G0IG01CIO Adopted SLES Expenditures Revised SLES Expenditures Administrative Assistant $69,921 $22,237 40 -hour Patrol Officer $50,137 $95,271 Total $120,058 $117,508 Available SLES Funds $117,508 $117,508 Overage $2,550 $0 A budget amendment will not be required. G0IG01CIO Honorable City Council November 22, 2002 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Conduct public hearing; and 2. Approve revised SLES expenditure plan. GW017 TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council Barry K. Hogan, Community Prepared By: Paul Porter, A Al All Z11 Development Direc Principal Planne/ November 19, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/04/02) SUBJECT: Consider Minor Modification No. 1 to IPD Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02 to Modify Condition No. 5 of City Council Resolution No. 99 -1658, Requesting Extension of Time to June 6, 2004, for "Use Inauguration" of Project Located on Lots 15 and 16 of Tract No. 3492 at the Northeast Corner of Condor Drive and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Calabasas BCD, Inc. (APN Nos. 513- 0 -060- 175 and 513 -0- 060 -185) BACKGROUND On October 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -1658 approving Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02. IPD No. 99 -01 consists of a 28,240 square foot (23,840 square foot 1st floor and 4,440 square foot mezzanine) tilt -up concrete industrial warehouse building on Lot No. 15 of Tract No. 3492; and IPD No. 99 -02 consists of a 31,720 square foot (26,160 square foot 1st floor and 5,560 square foot mezzanine) tilt -up concrete industrial warehouse building on Lot 16 of Tract No. 3492, both located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive. Although these two (2) planned development projects are designed to appear as one (1) structure, two (2) lots are involved and two (2) occupancies will take place. Condition No. 5 of Resolution No. 99 -1658 required that the project be "use inaugurated" (building foundation in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after the permit was granted (by October 6, 2001). The Community Development Director was authorized to grant one additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration. On September 4, 2001, the Community Development Director approved a time extension to October 6, 2002. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \I P D \1999 -01 02 Calabasas BCD \Min Mod 1 \cc 021204 report.doc 0 0 G4) 1 71 S Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page No. 2 On October 7, 2002, Ball Properties on behalf of Cardservice International, filed for Minor Modification No. 1 to IPD Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02 requesting revision to Condition No. 5 to extend the "use inauguration" deadline to June 6, 2004. DISCUSSION In a letter dated October 5, 2002 (CC Attachment 3), the applicant's representative indicates that plans and specifications required to "use inaugurate" both buildings should be completed within one (1) year. The letter also discussed the applicant's efforts and focus on completion of work for the existing building (formerly Litton). Based on the applicant's continuing work on the overall project, and the fact that there have not been any substantial changes in the surrounding area, staff supports the request to extend the "use inauguration" date to June 2004. Subsequent to the approval of IPD Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02 in October 1999, many of the City's standard Conditions of Approval have changed to meet current code and policy requirements, in particular, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Staff therefore recommends that the Conditions of Approval be further amended to include updated requirements. Staff's recommendations are included in the attached draft Resolution and proposed amended Conditions of Approval. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Negative Declaration prepared for IPD Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02 is adequate to serve as the environmental document for this application. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Minor Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02, amending Conditions of Approval. Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page No. 3 Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution No. 2002- 2. City Council Resolution No. 99 -1658. 3. Letter from Ball Properties, dated October 5, 2002. 4. Location Map 5. Project Exhibits RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOS. 99 -01 AND -02 FOR MODIFICATION OF CONDITION NO. 5, AND AMENDMENT OF OTHER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 99 -1658, TO REFLECT CURRENT CITY STANDARDS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOTS 15 AND 16 OF TRACT 3492 ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CONDOR DRIVE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE ON THE APPLICATION OF CALABASAS BCD, INC (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 513 -0- 060 -175 AND 513 -0- 060 -185) WHEREAS, on October 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99 -1658 conditionally approving Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Permit Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02, located on lots 15 and 16 of Tract 3492 on the northeast corner of Condor Drive and Los Angeles Avenue (Assessor Parcel Nos. 513 -0- 060 -175 {lot 151 and 513 -0- 060 -185 {lot 16}); and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on December 4, 2002, the City Council considered Minor Modification No. 1 to IPD Nos. 99 -01 and -02, to extend "use inauguration" and to amend certain conditions of approval to reflect current City standards, on the application of Calabasas BCD, Inc.; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of December 4, 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing, took public testimony, and after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and any supplements thereto, and consideration of written and oral public testimony both for and against the proposal, has reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the Community Development Director's finding that the Negative Declaration prepared for IPD 99 -01 and IPD 99 -02 is adequate to serve as the environmental document for this application. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: The City Council makes the following findings: A. The request is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and applicable titles of the Moorpark Municipal Code, as it makes only slight alterations to the Conditions of Approval for a commercial use, on property which is appropriately designated and zoned for such uses. CC ATTACHMENT 1 '1'°01 'x: Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 B. The request is compatible with the character of surrounding development because the changes proposed enable the subject project to meet current City standards within an existing industrial area. C. The proposal would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses because the proposed alterations to the existing use are minor and consistent with the development standards of the Municipal Code. D. The proposal would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare, because the proposed action will not result in changes which would cause or worsen hazards or other adverse conditions, and would in fact reduce the discharge of pollutants from the site which may be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves Minor Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development (IPD) Nos. 99 -01 and 99 -02 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval ��yy ,.�,,�.�6 •�, ell) Resolution No. 2002 - Page 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NOS. 1999 -01 AND -02 All Conditions of approval as Specified in Resolution No. 99 -1658 are applicable to this protect except as modified herein. Use Inauguration 5. That ansess the e3� failure te inaugurate the in picej eet is inaugurated (building in !at slab than place--anEi twe substantial to =this work pL=egirret r f e i=ffi i s e, (2) years - perms � - granted +h that date. The this per D; shall: GefFffaianity �u�e�t DevelepfRent �e��p�e -^ his her diseretiefi., reecer of Fftay, at er h been h i t inaug,aratien i f i l t �ts —ice + that -, t l-, a j_-r has .] 4 l4 ,-, a- 1. a ' � =ea sin e ' p e a n ea�-Ce e e g initial tw d.The i thims- eri-e L=equ be in est e r- even leas s ear -ef thii entitlefftent fftidst tire- ffti3ue writing, at the l (3G, elays prleate expiicati-en elate ef- - peL=Fft-it . That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than June 6, 2004, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. Abandonment of Use 6. e3� failure te inaugurate the , use, the r-eFises shall be rester -eel ; tte to �h^ eeeli t i e r s existing pi=± e 3 -t e the iesuane e . f e i=ffi i s e, nearly as praetreeble In the event that the uses for which the Industrial Planned Development Permit as approved are determined to be abandoned, the City of Moorpark may, at its discretion, initiate revocation procedures for cause per the provisions of Section 17.44.080. For purposes of this condition, "abandoned" shall mean a cessation of a business or businesses which would render the business unavailable to the public for a period of 180 or more consecutive days. Initiation of revocation procedures may result in the revocation of the permit or modification of the permit based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. 'i3rIAO Resolution No. 2002 - Page 4 Code Enforcement Costs 37. eievelepffient —pr-ej eel that is net in e@R}plianee 4�1 +tee r with theGex-d!4�rens of Appr-evaler applieable eedes. if Apps, r t fails -fie pay all —C i t y ee s tsr=l a t e d t e—t h aetie^,rare —C enae} s -ei-al assessffient r----=eI against the - a r ee l e f land apen whieh the - nti±sa~ s }� (Mime -i pal -C-eele Seetien -r12.080) The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance ". The Permittee shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the Permittee fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed. All sections of the Municipal Code relating to public nuisance and City costs shall apply. Liahtincr Plan 44. Pal all eerier lighting, a lighting plan _ i ce l be pi=e pa by an e- ieet:iea lend -i-n e =. — r eg i s terms —in the State of Galifern re' si:ibfftitted to the Depe-rtffient —ef shall a-ehieve t-he- €-e3lewing ebjeetivest aveid int-erfer -~ ==' with re le- use—ef ae1}eining pr-epei=t -s; ?Rix ii Fe en- site and e f f _ s i tn—g 1-are; p r-e vide -a deqi:ia t e en-site light' g�. t - J - - - r. J 11mit —e-1 e et r-eliers height; p r e y ide --et ridet u e s wh ieh a E e eeFftpatible - E�lt h 4 c h e ce -c cl : design ef the - p- r= ep6sL -- Tf - - - t y a;iiT nilize —enei= y t e. The lighting plan shall inel:adn the f el , ewir� J layeiat te extend a minimuFft ef twenty (20) feet eutsd: the pLaeper-ty lines. Layeut plan te be based en a ten landseape and - building lighting Resolution No. 2002 - Page 5 b,) Plamiffiaffi eveicall height ef fi�itidi=es shall be twenty five 25) €,. ,le ss e } h e r s . a L=e L=ee t eic -e-€ A lighting plan consistent with Chapter 17.30 shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for new construction or relocation of any building. Roof Mounted Equipment 48. Reef ffieunteel equipffient is pre lbit-eel, emeept fe s c rid- -e n— al —feur- sides by view ebsedring fftateL=ial: tha-t- Win; ntegr-alesign e- iefftent of the building. Prier tewe �: C X"-, 0. r , -• I- -- ' ; 1�'k, }ICS 7J Resolution No. 2002 - Page 6 Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for equipment that cannot be mounted on the ground and approved to be roof mounted by the Community Development Director. No roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) may extend above any parapet wall, unless screened on all four sides by view obscuring material that is an integral design element of the building. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof - mounted equipment shall be approved by the Community Development Director. All screening shall be tall enough to block all ground level views as well as those from the street and shall be maintained during the life of the permit. Construction material shall match the color and material used in the construction of the buildings. Colors, materials and building appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof, etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible with the existing building and adjacent development and non - reflective in nature. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Svstem NPDES -- - RIAS _ - -- -- Resolution No. 2002 - Page 7 l +- shall \ T l l e��e��e�r -a ri inlets b e l a b el ee -"De�� el e a n e , „ . b)Die epeeeE yehiiele ffiaintenanee shall be alleweel. ire ate y pr , e i= t eGet e b eLTt he—r-a _ I I _, seas oma ON M l +- shall \ T l l e��e��e�r -a ri inlets b e l a b el ee -"De�� el e a n e , „ . b)Die epeeeE yehiiele ffiaintenanee shall be alleweel. Ei) All -e n -size - steer —dry ' s h -, l l - lee el e a n e , ire ate y pr , e i= t eGet e b eLTt he—r-a _ I I _, seas oma cY L1i (� Resolution No. 2002 - Page 8 All h e be to the swepic iFegulai=ly 3 rt-ter debzAs Ti=efft r��ent aeeufftulatien ef t eng the er���a anel — en rte rfft - - en—sl ide the i th ce h_,-. 7 -.h be , �-e the was+.,- shall sto.r+. 7z Disc t : h . p r-e g r-afft suen 1 -, 1, ,-7 i s e sanitar-y re the ewer— a-r e— re Geunty Waterweicks „; r review appr-eval - -ef T'0' N IT .T ] s} e+- inlets. In the h te event, s lee installed u gLnea inlet; s e-tr a p s— a-r=L=equiiaed l }he Applieant - en—sl ide the i th ce sh-1 €eLa p re v —C T ,-, h d•e=o�E^ ^ a Riaintenanee ,-, h the G G� D p r-e g r-afft suen 1 -, 1, ,-7 i u�> —ems^ i t r} that the e s shall e n�l�t�a f the ,_ r} —ewn e i- ager o —de e, ei shh�fftaintain sueh Ejz�e h intereepter-S r the Tarntenanee eens ±sttw1t requiL=eFftents of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDES A. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. B. Prior to approval of plans for NPDES Facilities, the Permittee shall provide to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, engineering and geotechnical reports to prove, that all NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. C. The permittee shall prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan to address construction impacts from the project on downstream facilities, environments and watersheds. A qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements and recommendations for the use of best available technology. The storm water pollution prevention plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading.During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance Resolution No. 2002 - Page 9 of natural groundcover on the project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. During grading operations, the Permittee shall employ a full -time superintendent, whose responsibilities will include, without limitation, NPDES compliance. Upon City Engineer's determination that the NPDES compliance effort is unsatisfactory, the permittee shall designate an NPDES superintendent who shall have no other duties than NPDES compliance. The superintendent responsible for NPDES compliance shall: a. Have full authority and responsibility to attain NPDES compliance. b. Have full authority to hire personnel, bind the permittee in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate BMP's. C. Provide proof to the City Engineer and satisfactory completion of courses, satisfactory to the City Engineer, totaling no less than eight (8) hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of BMP's. d. Be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is forty percent (400) or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of qradinq bonds. D. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the project storm water pollution prevention plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as required by Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002: a. Minimize removal of existing veqetation. b. Protect exposed soil from wind and rain. C. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities to the extent possible. 0"C s.. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 10 e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale earth, and sandbaa dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure durin the October throuah April rainv season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. E. The permittee shall prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan to address long term operational impacts from the project on downstream facilities, environments and watersheds. A qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements, maintenance measures, estimated life spans of best management practices facilities, operational recommendations and recommendations for specific best management practices technology. The use of permanent dense ground cover planting approved by the City Engineer shall be required for all graded slopes. Methods of protecting the planted slopes from damage shall be included. Proposed management efforts during the lifetime of the project shall include best available technology. The avoidance of the use of mechanical stormwater treatment facilities such as clarifiers, separators, filters, absorbents, adsorbents or similar patented devices is strongly encouraged. Should there be no alternative to their use, the Permittee shall permanently indemnify the City from all liability or costs that it may incur through use or maintenance failure, in a form approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer, and City Manager at their discretion. The use of biological filtering, bio- remediation, infiltration of prefiltered storm water and similar measures that operate without annual maintenance intervention, that are failsafe, that, when maintenance is needed, will present the need for maintenance in an obvious fashion and which will be maintainable in a cost effective and non - disruptive fashion is required. The storm water pollution prevention plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. F. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas when Resolution No. 2002 - Page 11 required by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura Countv Waterworks District No. 1. G. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Permittee shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to the satisfaction of the Citv Engineer. H. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. I. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system. J. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." K. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Permittee shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The Permittee shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPCP)- L. The Permittee shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Permittee shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. G C 01 ii Resolution No. 2002 - Page 12 M. The Permittee shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." N. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the permittee shall provide facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (BMP's) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the Permittee to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 0. Prior to City issuance of a grading permit, the permittee shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require permittee to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite shall not be allowed. P. The project construction plans shall state that the Permittee shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a. All onsite storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump Drains to Arroyo." b. No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. C. The entire project site and any off -site improvement areas shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d. All onsite storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and once in January. Water flushing is not an approved method for cleanina. e. All sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from enterina the storm drain. 0' .a S1 a l Resolution No. 2002 - Page 13 No cleaning agent shall be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the Countv Waterworks District No. 1. f. The City shall require that "passive" devices and BMP's be used to comply with NPDES water quality requirements. The Permittee shall provide the City with a Maintenance Program for such devices. The Operation and Easement Agreement shall include a requirement that the Permittee /Property Owner(s) shall maintain, in perpetuity, such devices in a manner consistent with specific requirements to be detailed within the Maintenance Program. 107. The I�,pplie.arat shall pay a - tr-affie ffiit=g-a; ien fee ef --$. 5-9 and tr-affie Grp iev effients die etlye � -r die etly af fee } _ ,� -y l the- develepffient= Prior to Issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee, in the amount of $0.50 per gross square foot of building floor area to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development shall be paid. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexina which results in an increase. New Conditions 168. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the contractor shall provide proof to the Building Division that all contractors doing work in Moorpark have a valid Business Reaistration Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Zonina Resolution No. 2002 - Page 14 Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. 169. Tree pruning which consists of excessive tree trimming to limit the height and /or width of tree canopy and results in a reduction in required shade coverage for parking lot area is prohibited and will be considered a violation of the project approval, and subject to code enforcement. 170. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with five (5) or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices landscaped areas for infiltration and biological remediation or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. ()C,0 i RESOLUTION NO. 99 -1658 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NOS. 99 -1 AND 99 -2 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWO INDUSTRIAL /WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS LOCATED ON LOTS 15 AND 16 OF TRACT NO. 3492 ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CONDOR DRIVE AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE ON THE APPLICATION OF RICE DEVELOPMENT LLC (ASSESSOR- PARCEL NOS. 513 -0- 060 -175 (LOT 15) AND 513 -0- 060 -185 (LOT 16)) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on October 6, 1999, the City Council considered the application filed by Rice Development LLC for approval of the following: Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 99 -1 (Building 2) 28,240 square foot (23,840 sq. ft 1st floor, 4,440 sq. ft. mezzanine) tilt -up concrete industrial /warehouse building on Lot No. 15 of Tract 3492. Assessor's Parcel No. 513 -0- 060 -175. Industrial Planned Development No. 99 -2 (Building 1) A 31,720 square foot tilt -up concrete industrial /warehouse building (26,160 -sq. ft. 1st floor, 5,560 -sq. ft. mezzanine) on Lot No. 16 of Tract 3492. Assessor's Parcel No. 513- 0 -060- 185. WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 6, 1999, the City Council opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, the Negative Declaration and testimony, has found that impacts resulting from this proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report for the City Council meeting, the Negative Declaration and testimony has made a decision in the matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: CC ATTACHMENT 2 0)335 Resolution No Page 2 SECTION 1 findings: 99 -1658 The City Council hereby adopts the following CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS: 1. The Negative Declaration /Initial Study for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. 2. The contents in the Negative Declaration /Initial Study have been considered in the various decisions on the proposed entitlement request. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth above, it is determined that this application with the attached conditions meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. 3. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. 4. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 2. The City Council has received and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed projects. 0. U,, ) 0 13 G Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 3 SECTION 3. The City Council adopts the Negative Declaration. SECTION 4. The City Council approves Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 99 -1 and 99 -2 subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October 1999. ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk ATTACHMENT: Conditions of Approval G1 -3v13 ate, Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 99 -1 and 99 -2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - General Requirements Permitted Uses 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions. All proposed uses of these buildings shall be required to receive a Zoning Clearance from the Department of Community Development. The Department may determine that certain uses will require other types of entitlements or environmental assessment. Other Regulations 2. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 Zone, and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, Ventura County, City authorities, and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. Discontinuance of Use 3. The Industrial Planned Development Permit shall expire when any of the uses for which it is granted is abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive days. Submittal of Plans to Department of Community Development 4. All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final parcel map (if requested by the Director of Community Development), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. Use Inauguration 5. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his or her discretion, grant up to one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if G? 't)0 ay Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 5 Applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial two year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be made in writing, at least thirty (30) -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. Abandonment of Use e. upon expiration of this permit, or failure to inaugurate the use, the premises shall be restored by the permittee to the conditions existing prior to the issuance of the permit, as nearly as practicable. Other Regulations 7. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. Severability 8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. Permittee Defense Costs 9. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his or her sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his or her obligation under this condition. Zoning Clearance Prior to Building Permit 10. Prior to approval of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development. If an Applicant desires, construction plans may be submitted to the Building and Safety Department prior to approval of this development permit with a City approved Hold Harmless Agreement. Zoning Clearance Required for Occupancy 11. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Gel J 1� Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 6 Community Development Department. The purpose of the Zoning Clearance shall be to determine if the proposed use(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. Certificate of Occupancy Requirement 12. No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy' has been issued by the Building and Safety Department. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the Applicant has provided a faithful performance bond. At the discretion of the Director of Community Development, said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the City Council. Tenant Occupancy 13. Prior to the occupancy, applicable proposed uses shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the proposal will comply with all applicable State and local regulations related to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the Applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. Change of Ownership Notice 14. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. Other Uses 15. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zoning Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the M -1 Zone and the terms and V �GC;� •0 Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 7 conditions of this permit, and if a Minor or Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit is required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. Business Registration 16. Prior to the issuance of a' Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. Acceptance of Conditions 17. The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. Fish and Game Requirement 18. Within two days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving these Industrial Planned Development Permits, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250 plus a $ 25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and (b)Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; (c) the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. Provision for Image Conversion of Plans into Optical Format 19. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the builder shall provide to the City an image conversion of plans as determined by the Director of Community Development into an optical format (TIF) acceptable to the City Clerk. On -site Improvements 20. No Zoning Clearance may be issued for building occupancy until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been provided or the Director of Community Development approves the acceptance of a Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of exterior improvements not related to grading, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full force and effect for one year after occupancy to guarantee that improvements not related to grading are maintained. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 8 APCD Review of Uses 21. Prior to occupancy, Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials. Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District is provided. Utilities Assessment District 22. The Applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground Utility Assessment District. Continued Maintenance 23. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) days after notification. Repair or Maintenance of Trucks 24. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any other vehicle shall occur on site, except completely within a wholly enclosed building. Noxious Odors 25. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. Uses and Activities to be Conducted Inside 26. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Director of Community Development and consistent with applicable Zoning Code provisions. Graffiti Removal 27. The Applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. Prior to the Issuance of Zoni Landscaping Submittal of Landscape Plans 28. Prior to issuance of a plan (3 sets), together Clearance for Construction Grading Permit, a complete landscape with specifications and a maintenance Cc- 1,16 *1Aa Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 9 program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to Grading Permit approval. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for manufactured slopes over three (3) feet in height. The purpose of the landscaping shall be to control erosion, prevent aesthetic impacts to adjacent property owners, mitigate the visual impacts of all manufactured slopes three (3) feet or more in height, and to replace mature trees lost as a result of construction. The final landscape plans shall also be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. The Applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape inspection. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall. be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. The landscaping shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and in place and receive final inspection prior to recordation of the map or occupancy as determined by the Director of Community Development. All landscaped areas shall have an irrigation system. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. The final landscape plans shall include landscaping specifications, planting details, and design specifications consistent with the following requirements: a) The permittee shall provide for additional enhanced landscaping equal to or greater than the cost of any trees to be removed as determined by the Director of Community Development. Additional trees, which form a canopy, shall be provided to shade parking and driveway areas to offset the value of the trees removed from the site. The landscape plan shall also incorporate extensive tree landscaping including specimen size trees as approved by the Director of Community Development along both Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive, and as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 10 b) The landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive shall be bermed as approved by the Director of Community Development. c) The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths within the project limits. d) All plant species utilized shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. e) Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. f) Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. g) Landscaping shall be designed to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. h) Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of light at ground level. i) Earthen berms, hedges and /or low walls shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from adjacent streets. j) Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above ground utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and /or a wall. k) A sufficiently dense tree - planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees and /or shrubs shall be designed. Fifty (50) percent (or as otherwise determined by the Director of Community Development) of all trees shall be a minimum of 24 inch box size in order to provide screening in a three (3) to five (5) year time period. All other trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon in size. Recommendations regarding Planting incorporated in the environmental document shall be incorporated to the degree feasible into the screening plan. 1) Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping, as identified in the approved plan. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaininng the irrigation system and all landscaping. The Applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary �s' � t3' L„r' "t Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 11 repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the development. m) The transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall or landscaping as approved by the Director of Community Development. n) All perimeter and /or garden walls shall be constructed prior to installation of any sidewalks or concrete slabs. o) Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. P) Prior to Final Inspection, the areas to be landscaped, as shown on the irrigation plan, shall be landscaped and irrigation system installed. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved Landscape and Irrigation Plans. q) The site plan shall be revised to reflect the build -out of Los Angeles Avenue. The additional area along Los Angeles Avenue as a result of the street improvements shall be landscaped and reflected in both the revised site plan and submitted landscape plans. The revisions to the plans are subject top the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. Offer of Dedication 29. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement to the City for maintaining all landscaping of the site adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive. Additionally, prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement and, if landscaping is placed in Caltrans right -of -way, execute a Maintenance Agreement between Caltrans and City subject to Caltrans and City approval. The purpose of this agreement is to ensure maintenance of the landscaping within the Caltrans right -of -way along Los Angeles Avenue to the satisfaction of the City. The area referred to shall be all landscaped portions of the required setback area adjacent to the public right -of -way along the street frontages. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the aforementioned area as well as the landscaping within the public right -of -way adjacent to the project. If the City at it's sole discretion determines the landscape maintenance is determined to be unsatisfactory in any ',wS 0y; it t� Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 12 of the aforementioned areas, the City may invoke the offer of dedication and assume responsibility at the owner's expense for any or all of the aforementioned areas. The total cost of maintenance for the areas noted above shall be borne by the Applicant. The City may at its sole discretion place the aforementioned areas in a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. The Applicant shall record a covenant to this effect. The Applicant shall maintain the right to protest the amount and spread of any proposed assessment, but not the formation of, or annexation to a maintenance Assessment District. FEES Case Processing Costs 30. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering) , and all City legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. In addition, the Applicant shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements of the most recently adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits. Current and Future Park System Contribution 31. Prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for construction, the Applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark, Current and Future Park System Contribution fund of an amount of $.25 per square foot (gross floor area) to support the City's current and future park system. Art and Public Places Contribution 32. The Applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark Art in Public Places Fund, an amount of $.10 per square foot of building area prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. The Applicant may create a public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying the Art in Public Places fee. The artwork must have a value corresponding to the fee and must receive approval from the City Council. Ordinance No. 102 Landscape Fee 33. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a fee established pursuant to Ordinance 102 in the amount of $.05 per square foot of the building area. The funds shall be used to install, maintain and replace landscape work on public property for the purpose of mitigating the removal of the natural landscape from the property of the development. Traffic System Management Contribution 34. Prior to issuance of the first Zoning Clearance for construction, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 13 foot of floor area to fund Traffic System Management programs for the total square footage approved for the project. Calleguas Municipal Water District Release 35. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the construction charge applicable to the proposed project have been made. Applicant shall be required to comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. School Assessment Fees 36. If applicable, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. Code Enforcement Costs 37. The Director of Community Development may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance ". The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). Revisions to Plot Plan and Requirement for Lot Line Adjustment 38. The plot plan shall be revised to reflect any additional requirements for right -of -way dedications, if additional right -of -way is required by the City Council. In addition, the following revisions to the site plan shall be made subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction: a) Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the applicant shall have recorded a Lot Line Adjustment and provide adequate verification to the Community Development Department that the two existing lots coincide with the proposed site plan for IPD 99 -1 and 99- 2. b) The site plan shall be revised to reflect the build -out of Los Angeles Avenue. The additional area along Los C`°C 111 1117 Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 14 Angeles Avenue as a result of the street improvements shall be landscaped and reflected in both the revised site plan and submitted landscape plans. The revisions to the plans are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development. Utility Room 39. A utility room with common access to house all meters shall be provided within the building. Use of Asbestos 40. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. Exterior Access 41. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. Plot Plan Requirements 42. The following shall be depicted on the plot plans and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development: a) The transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall or landscaping. b) All fences and walls shall be shown on the plot plan and landscaping and irrigation plan. c) Bicycle racks or storage facilities shall be provided on- site. d) All required loading areas and turning radius shall be depicted on the plot plan. A 45 -foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. e) Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatment) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. Parapet Wall Requirement 43. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18 -inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the flat roof area. Lighting Plan 44. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall 0 13 3 �: `� Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 15 achieve the following objectives:, avoid interference's with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; limit electroliers height; provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility and minimize energy consumption. The lighting plan shall include the following: a) A photometric plan showing a point -by -point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10) foot grid center. Down lighting and accent, landscape and building lighting shall be employed throughout the project. b) Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be twenty -five (25) feet, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. c) Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities with a maximum of one -foot candle illumination at or beyond property lines. d) Energy efficient lighting devices shall be provided. e) A minimum of one and a maximum of two -foot candle illumination with a 1.5 -foot candle average or as otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. f) No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from the street. g) Lighting devices in the parking lot shall be shielded and directed downward to avoid light and glare on neighboring properties. h) Lighting devices shall be high enough as to prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with them unless tamper proof fixtures are approved by the Director of Community Development. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage resistant covers. i) Lighting at all exterior doors shall be lighted with a minimum maintained two foot candles at ground level. j) Lighting standard concrete bases in planter areas shall be no more than 6 inches above ground level and must be flush with concrete walks if placed in hardscape areas. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 16 45. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a copy of the lighting plans shall be submitted to the Police Department for review. Location of Property Line Walls 46. All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. Downspouts 47. No downspouts building. shall be permitted on- the exterior of the Roof Mounted Equipment 48. Roof mounted equipment is prohibited, except for equipment that cannot be mounted on the ground and approved to be roof mounted by the Director of Community Development. No roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) may extend above any parapet wall, unless screened on all four sides by view obscuring material that is an intregal design element of the building. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof - mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Community Development. All screening shall be tall enough to block all ground level views as well as those from the street and shall be maintained during the life of the permit. Construction material shall match the color and material used in the construction of the buildings. Colors, materials and building appendages (such as mechanical equipment on the roof, etc.) of the proposed building shall be compatible with the existing building and adjacent development and non - reflective in nature. Exterior Ground Level Equipment 49. Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such as loading docks, shelter docks, cooling towers, generators, etc.) shall be screened from view by a masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development or his designee. The wall shall be constructed of materials and colors consistent with the main building. Building Materials and Colors 50. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be as submitted. Noise Generation Sources 51. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 17 line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources will be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical Engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. PARKING Striping of Spaces 52. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. Parking Lot Surface 53. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall be maintained at all times to insure safe access and use by employees, public agencies and service vehicles. Disposal Areas on Plot Plan 54. All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a six foot high solid wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be subject to review of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling /solid waste management programs. a) Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate, accessible and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials. The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of collection in the area in which the project is located. b) Adequate number of bins or containers shall be provided to allow for the collection and loading of recyclable materials generated by the development. For commercial (general, office, or retail), developments, space allotment for 2 three cubic yard bins (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.511), or a space allotment for one 40 cubic yard bin Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 18 (288" x 12011) and one 3 cubic yard bin (8411 x 53.5) . The intended use for this space is to hold two side -by -side 3 cubic yard containers (one for refuse, one for recyclables) , or one 40 cubic yard bin for refuse and one 3 cubic yard for recyclables. c) The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be compatible in design with, the development and the surrounding area. The trash enclosure area shall be covered to block the view from higher elevations to the east and north. d) Disposal areas shall be protected from weather conditions, which might render collected recyclable materials unmarketable. e) Driveways or travel aisles shall provide unobstructed access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or other specified clearance required by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. f) A sign, approved by the Director of Community Development, clearly identifying all recycling and solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials accepted therein shall be posted adjacent to all points of access to the recycling areas. g) Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or maintained as unencumbered, according to fire and other applicable building and /or public safety laws. h) Recycling area(s) shall be located so they are convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas. i) The design of the refuse and recycling enclosures shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction. All rubbish disposal areas and recycling areas shall be screened with a six -foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates. i) In cases where space for 2 three cubic yard bins is required (107" x 84 or 168" x 53.511), the opening of any bin enclosure must be at least 84 inches (the size of a three cubic yard bin) . This requirement applies to the amount of space exposed when the gate is fully opened. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 19 ii) Each refuse \recycling enclosure shall have gates and should be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open position. iii) Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access requirements of Title 24 and the American Disabilities Act. iv) The enclosure shall have • a separate indirect pedestrian access way, which does not require doors or gates. Franchise Hauler 55. The franchised hauler designated to service this location will be determined prior to construction. Recycling Plan 56. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to occupancy of the building. The plan shall include a designated building manager, who is responsible for initiating on -site waste materials recycling programs. This shall include the acquiring of storage bins for the separation of recyclable materials and coordination and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule. Waste Management Education Program 57. The on -site building manager or designee will conduct a routine waste management education program on -site to alert employees to any new developments or requirements for solid waste management. This measure shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste Management Department. Enforcement of Vehicle Codes 58. Prior to Occupancy, the Applicant shall request the City to enforce appropriate vehicle codes on subject property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7. BUILDING AND SAFETY Unconditional Will -Serve Letter 59. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. Water Service Connection 60. At the time water service connection is made for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed for the Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 20 water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS Prior to the Issuance of a Grading Permit, the Following Conditions Shall be Satisfied: General: 61. The Applicant shall demonstrate legal access to the parcel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Grading: 62. The Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with the approved preliminary grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 63. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Waterworks District No. 1 at the time of grading permit approval. 64. Project proposes 16,040 cu. yds. of cut, 3,150 cu. yds. of fill, and 11,930 cu. yds. of export. Unanticipated off -site import /export operations requiring an excess of 100 total truck loads (2,000 cubic yards maximum) shall require City Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route is to be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets may be required as directed by the City Engineer. 65. All requests for staged grading must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for review and approval by the City Council. 66. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to temporary grading activity that remains or is anticipated to Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 21 remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days or the beginning of the rainy season whichever comes first. 67. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are warranted, plans will be reviewed by a certified soil engineer and their recommendations will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. 68. All graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner meeting the approval of the Director of Community Development with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes and minimize erosion. 69. All development areas and lots shall be designed so that surface drainage is collected by the on -site storm drain system prior to connecting to the existing flood control channel to the south of the property. 70. So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The applicant shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. All material for the construction of the wall shall be approved by the City Engineer and Director of Community Development. Geotechnical /Geology Review 71. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, detailed Geotechnical Engineering Report certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer. The geotechnical engineering report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. In addition, the report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Note: Review of the geotechnical engineering report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative fee for this review. 72. All recommendations included in the approved geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented during project design, 010A�01��_;5 Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 22 grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the applicant's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soils report(s). Storm Water Runoff and Flood Control Planning: 73. The applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: a) Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: b) All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year frequency storm; c) All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm; d) All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; e) All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm; f) Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained in a storm drain system prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; g) Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction; h) Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the Applicant; 74 75. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 23 i) All drainage grates shall be designed and constructed with provisions to provide adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; j) If the land to be occupied is in an area of special flood hazard, the Applicant shall notify all potential buyers in writing of this hazard condition. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels. k) All flows from brow ditches, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended beyond the public right -of -way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right -of -way are to be maintained by the owners unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 1) Concrete drainage structures shall be tan colored concrete, as approved by the Director of Community Development, and to the extent possible shall incorporate natural structure and landscape to reduce their visibility. m) Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. n) A hydraulic /hydrology study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Applicant shall make any downstream improvements, required by Ventura County Flood Control and the City of Moorpark, to support the proposed development. o) Improvements shall be constructed to detain drainage on- site when the drainage amount is between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event. A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in the design unless an alternate design intensity is approved by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall demonstrate that surface drainage from the site shall not drain over the sidewalk or driveways. The Applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad within the development area that the following restrictions and Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 24 protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a) Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm. b) Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. c) Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 76. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 77. The Applicant shall provide for all necessary on -site and off - site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. These facilities (if applicable) must also be acceptable to the Ventura County Flood Control'District. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) 78. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Applicant /owner shall submit a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan ( SWPCP), on the form provided by the City for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 79. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS063339. 80. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to stormwater and shall include the design and placement of recommended. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system during construction. 81. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Applicant /owner shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002) : Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities. The Applicant /owner shall comply with all additional requirements of this General Permit Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 25 including preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 82. The Applicant shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 83. The Applicant shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Stormwater Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." This handout is available at the City Engineers office and a copy will be attached to the approved grading permit. 84. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS063339. 85. The project construction plans shall note and incorporate that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development for the review and approval of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a) All on -site storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump - Drains to Arroyo ". b) No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. c) All common area property shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d) All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and once in January. e) All common sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from entering the storm drain. No cleaning agent must be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the County Waterworks District No. 1. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 26 f) If required by the BMP's, grease interceptors shall be installed in all on -site and off -site storm drain inlets. In the event, such grease traps are required to be installed in any on --site inlet; the Applicant shall provide the City with a maintenance program for such devices. In such event, the CC &R's shall include a requirement that the owner /manager of the development shall maintain such grease interceptors in a manner consistent with requirements of the Maintenance Program. Street Improvement Requirements: 86. The Applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. Street improvements and median and parkway landscaping shall not be accepted by the City for maintenance until completion, unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. 87. Publicly dedicated streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision). 88. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, parkways, street lights, and signing, striping, interim striping and traffic control, paving, and any necessary transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All driveway locations shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The Applicant shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. Los Angeles Avenue a) The applicant shall improve Los Angeles Avenue to a Ventura County Standard Plate B -2 -B: right -of -way width of 94 feet, two 12 foot wide travel lanes each direction, a 14 foot wide striped median, two 8 foot wide bike lanes, curb and gutter, and a sidewalk width of 8 feet. b) In addition, the Applicant shall submit an application to Caltrans to vacate Caltrans right -of -way outside the New Los Angeles Avenue right -of -way of 94 feet. If Caltrans denies the application, the Applicant shall accept a future offer of vacation by the City of Moorpark to receive right -of -way outside the New Los Angeles Avenue right -of -way of 94 feet. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 27 Condor Drive a) Driveways shall be designed in accordance with the latest Ventura County Road Standards. b) The Applicant shall prepare a reciprocal driveway and access easement for Lot 15 and Lot 16. This document is to be submitted to the City Engineer, Director of Community Development, and City Attorney for review and approval, and recorded with the County of Ventura prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for either Lot 15 or Lot 16. c) The plans shall provide for removal and replacement of all damaged sections of curb and gutter. 89. The Applicant shall provide slope easements for road maintenance purposes only along all roads where the top of cut plus 5 feet or the toe of fill plus 5 feet is beyond the dedicated right -of -way. Said slope easements shall include the area covered by the cut slope plus 5 feet and fill slope plus 5 feet. 90. Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. 91. The Applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. 92. Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes, etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas whenever possible. When above ground obstructions are to be placed within the sidewalk, a minimum five (5) foot clear sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction. 93. Additional surety shall be provided for resurfacing and /or repair of the full width portion of Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive located adjacent to the project. The surety shall be used to secure the curb replacement and overlay or slurry of the street, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching. The City may require restoration of the streets before occupancy of the building. Surety will be returned upon the City Engineer accepting the condition of the street. 94. The Applicant shall submit a study to determine the optimum lengths of left turn pockets on Los Angeles Avenue serving the southern driveway for the Kavlico site and the southern Condor Drive intersection. If required, the Applicant is required to make the necessary striping modifications. C", 01y ' Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 28 95. The Applicant shall restripe the Los Angeles Avenue, Condor Drive, and Virginia Colony intersection to clearly delineate left turn and right turn lanes and centerline striping for the review and approval by the City Engineer. 96. The Applicant's Traffic Engineer has determined that the proposed project will degrade the Los Angeles Avenue and State Route 118 westbound ramp intersection from a LOS B to a LOS C. The Applicant is required to provide - mitigation measures or pay an in -lieu (pro -rata share) fee to improve the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and State Route 118 westbound ramp from a LOS C to a LOS B for the review and approval by the City Engineer. Other: 97. The Applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform with Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 98. The Applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations. These measures shall be implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department (Waterworks District No. 1) . 99. All proposed utility lines within and immediately adjacent to the project site (as determined by the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer) shall be placed underground to the nearest off -site utility pole. All existing utilities shall also be underground to the nearest off -site utility pole with the exception of 66 KVA or larger power lines. This requirement for undergrounding includes all aboveground power poles on the project site as well as those along the frontage of the site. The Applicant shall indicate in writing how this condition will be satisfied. Any above grade utility fixtures shall be placed adjacent to landscaped areas and screened on three sides. 100. The final design and location of all walls and fences, streetscape elements, urban landscaping are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. � � r< ,'� 'il ,J+, . tea Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 29 101. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall, provide for a surveyors statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. 102. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements will be acquired by the Applicant at his expense. 103. The Applicant shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. 104. The Applicant shall offer to dedicate access easements to the City over all private streets to provide access for all governmental agencies providing public safety, health and welfare. 105. The Applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City public use, and all right -of -way easements for public streets. 106. The Applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all site improvements within the development and other off -site improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access -ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. 107. The Applicant shall pay a traffic mitigation fee of $.50 per gross square foot of building area to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. 108. The Applicant shall make a special contribution to the City representing the Applicants pro -rata share of the cost of improvements at the following intersection: Los Angeles Ave. /Spring Road (estimated cost of improvement $150,000) The actual contribution (pro -rata share) shall be based upon the additional traffic added to the intersection. The Applicants Traffic Engineer shall provide the City Engineer an estimate of the projected traffic numbers for calculation of the pro -rata share. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 30 During Grading, the Following Conditions Shall ADul 109. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 15th to April 15th subject to installation of erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 15th and April 15th. 110. Prior to any work being conducted within the State, County, or City right -of -way, the Applicant shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. 111. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. 112. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations, dust shall be controlled by regular watering. In addition the following measures shall apply: a) Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on -site or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks that will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b) Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. c) Water or securely cover all material transported off -site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d) Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. e) Facemasks shall be used by all employees involved in grading or excavation operations during dry periods to reduce inhalation of dust, which may contain the fungus, which causes San Joaquin Valley Fever. f) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 31 g) Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 113. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a) Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast - growing, soil- binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b) Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.) which may have accumulated from construction activities. 114. All diesel engines used in construction equipment shall use reformulated diesel fuel. 115. During smog season (May- October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 116. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services, and may be further restricted or prohibited should the City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays, pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. 117. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes that avoid residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. 118. The Applicant shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. 119. Equipment not in use for more than ten minutes shall be turned off. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 32 120. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 121. The Applicant shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 122. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune as set forth in manufacturers specifications. 123. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4" fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 124. Soil testing for trench compaction is to be performed on all trenches for pipe or conduit placement. The interval of testing shall be less than once every 4 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated. 125. Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the construction area. 126. During site preparation and construction, construct temporary storm water diversion structures per City of Moorpark standards. Prior to Issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Building Permit the Following Conditions Shall be Satisfied: 127. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay to the City the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee, which shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time the fee is paid. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence of the City Manager, the Applicant would not have to pay the AOC fee. 128. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. V t . -, Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 33 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the Following Conditions Shall be Satisfied: 129. Construction of Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive improvements and /or repairs shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. 130. If directed by the City, the Applicant shall have repaired, overlayed or slurried that portion of Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive adjacent the development. The repairs, curb replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry of the streets, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching shall be along the entire length of the project including transitions unless otherwise approved and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements and Bond Reduction and /or Exoneration, the Following Conditions Shall be Satisfied: 131. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 132. Sufficient surety in a form and amount acceptable to the City guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided, and shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. 133. If necessary, the Applicant shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. 134. Original "as built" plans will be certified by the Applicant's registered Civil Engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" x 3611, they must be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a series of 22" x 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection will be scheduled. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 135. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for the review and approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to occupancy. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 34 136. Prior to combustible construction, all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed. 137. The access roadway(s) shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first floor of any building. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection systems or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Fire District. 138. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet and /or five miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance No. 22. 139. Building Plans for all A,E,H and I occupancies shall be submitted to the Fire District for plan check. 140. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (611) high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 250 feet (2501 ) from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street; the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 141. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for approval of the location of hydrants, and show existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development. 142. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a) Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have (1) 4 inch and (2) 2 1/2 inch outlet(s). b) The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 -psi residual pressure. c) Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d) Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face 24 inches on center. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 35 143. The minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the 1994 Uniform Fire Code Appendix III -A and adopted Amendments. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2250 gallons per minute at 20 psi. The Applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required volume at the project. 144. Building shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system; plans shall be submitted, with fees for plan review and approval, to the Fire District. 145. Building plans of all Assembly and Hazardous occupancies shall be submitted with fees for plan review and approval, to the Fire District. 146. Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted with fees for plan review and approval to the Fire District. 147. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire District. 148. All grass or brush exposing any structure(s) to fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance. 149. Industrial trash dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within 5 feet of openings, combustible walls, or combustible roof eave lines unless protected by approved automatic fire sprinklers. (Uniform Fire Code, Article 11.) 150. Portions of this development may be in a high fire hazard area and those structures shall meet hazardous fire area building code requirements. 151. The Applicant shall obtain and comply with the provisions of VCFD Form #126 Requirements For Construction prior to obtaining a Building Permit for any new structures or additions to existing structures. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Construction Site Security Provisions. All new construction, shall comply with the following security measures until the utilities have been released by the City: 152. Perimeter lighting shall be installed at a minimum of 150 -foot intervals and at a height not less than 15 feet from the Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 36 ground. The light source used shall have a minimum light output of 2000 lumens, be protected by a vandalism resistant cover, and be lighted during the hours of darkness. Additional lighting shall be required if the construction site exceeds four acres in area. Lighting shall be installed at locations designated by the Chief of Police. 153. In addition to perimeter lighting previously described, one of the following shall be used: a) Fencing, not less than six feet in height, which is designed to preclude human intrusion, shall be installed along the perimeter boundaries of the construction site. b) A uniformed security guard, licensed according to Business and Professions Code, Chapter 11, shall be utilized to continually patrol the construction site during the hours when construction work has ceased. c) Construction equipment, tools and materials will be properly secured to prevent theft during non - working hours. d) All computers and appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) Will be properly secured to prevent theft prior to installation during non- working hours. All serial numbers will be recorded for identification purposes. e) If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors, windows, roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 154. Security Guard. After occupancy, the Applicant shall provide a security guard on -site, if required by the Police Department. 155. Exterior Access. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 156. Windows and Sliding Glass Doors. The following requirements must be met for windows and sliding glass doors: a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, all operable exterior windows and sliding glass doors shall comply with the tests set forth in these conditions. b) Louvered windows shall not be used, when a portion of the window is less than 12 feet vertically or 6 feet horizontally from an accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform, or similar structure. 601.'1 ,,,,°5��^)� �1 %, X i . 67 Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 37 157. Garage -type Doors. All garage doors shall conform to the following standards: a) Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of 5/16 inch in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the support framing. b) Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215 inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches of the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door. C) Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum density of six ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of seven (7) feet. Panels above seven (7) feet and panels shall have a density not less that five- (5) ounce per square foot. d) Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five -pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one (1) inch. e) Doors that exceed 16 feet in width, but do not exceed 19 feet in width, shall have the following options as to locking devices: i) Two lock- receiving points, or one garage- door -type lide bolt may be used if mounted no higher that 26 inches from the bottom of the door; ii) A single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking point located either at the floor or door frame header; iii) Torsion spring counter balance type hardware may be used if such hardware substantially complies with the requirements of this chapter. f) Doors secured by electrical operation shall have a keyed switch to open the door when in a closed position, or shall have a signal locking device to open the door. g) Doors with slide bolt assemblies shall have frames of a minimum of .120 inches in thickness, with a minimum bolt diameter of one -half inch and protrude at least 1 2 inches into the receiving guide. A bolt diameter of 3/8 inch may be used in a residential building. The slide bolt shall Ali' W Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 38 be attached to the door with non - removable bolts from the outside. Rivets shall not be used to attach slide bolt assemblies. h) Padlock(s) used with exterior mounted slide bolt(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle locking both at heel and toe and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with non - removable key when in an unlocked position. Padlock(s) used with interior mounted slide- bolts(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle with a minimum four -pin tumbler operation. Landscaping 158. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. Landscaping shall not reduce the visibility of passing motorists view of activities in the parking area. 159. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection will not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 160. Landscaping (trees) will not be placed directly under any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of light at ground level. Special Building Provisions - Commercial 161. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows: a) Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of 1 3/4 inches. Wood panel doors with panels less than one inch thick shall be covered on the inside with a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge sheet steel, or its equivalent, which is to be attached with screws on minimum six -inch centers. Hollow steel doors shall be of a minimum sixteen U.S. gauge and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around any locking device. b) Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized, any glazing in exterior doors or within 48 inches of any door - locking mechanism shall be constructed or protected as follows: i) Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing; or Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 39 Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with a minimum two -inch mesh secured on the inside of the glazing may be utilized; or iii) The glazing .shall be covered with iron bars of a least one -half inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material, spaced not more than five inches apart, secured on the inside of the glazing; 162. All swinging exterior wood and steel 'doors shall be equipped as follows: a) A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. The dead bolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4 inch into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4 inch in diameter. The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply where: i) Panic hardware is required; or ii) An equivalent device is approved by the enforcing authority. b) Double doors shall be equipped as follows: i) The inactive leaf of double door(s) shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8 inch into the head and threshold of the doorframe. Double doors shall have an astragal constructed of steel a minimum of .125 thick, which will cover the opening between the doors. The astragal shall be a minimum of two inches wide, and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with non - removable bolts spaced apart on not more that ten -inch centers. The door to which such an astragal is attached must be determined by the fire safety codes adopted by the enforcing authority. iii) Every single or double exterior door equipped with lever - handled locking mechanism hardware shall have an approved handicapped - accessible threshold complying with provisions of Title 24 of the Uniform Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 40 Building Code (as amended from time to time) beneath the door. The opening between the threshold and the door shall be secured in a manner approved by the Crime Prevention Bureau of the Moorpark Police Department designed to prevent the passing of rigid materials or mechanical devices between the door and the threshold for the purposes of unlocking the door from the interior side. c) Aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped as follows: i) The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to prevent pealing of the door frame around the strike and withstand 1600 pounds of pressure in both a vertical distance of three inches and a horizontal distance of one inch each side of the strike, so as to prevent violation of the strike. d) A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder dead bolt with a bolt projection exceeding one inch, or a hook shaped or expanding dog bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading. The dead bolt lock shall have a minimum of five pin tumblers and a cylinder guard. e) Panic hardware, whenever required by the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code, shall be installed as follows: i) Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of two locking points on each door; or ii) On single doors, panic hardware may have one locking point, which is not to be located at either the top or bottom rails of the doorframe. The door shall have an astragal constructed of steel .125 inch thick, which shall be attached with non - removable bolts to the outside of the door. The astragal shall extend a minimum of six inches vertically above and below the latch of the panic hardware. The astragal shall be a minimum of two inches wide and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached. iii) Double doors containing panic hardware shall have an astragal attached to the doors at their meeting point, which will close the opening between them, but not interfere with the operation of either door. � VC'`14 Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 41 f) Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top and bottom and a cylinder lock and /or padlock with a hardened steel shackle which locks at both heel and toe, and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with non - removable key when in an unlocked position. The bottom track shall be so designed that the door cannot be lifted from the track when the door is in a locked Position. g) In office buildings (multiple occupancy), all entrance doors to individual office suites shall meet the construction and locking requirements for exterior doors. h) Windows shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve feet above ground. Accessible windows and all exterior transoms having a pane exceeding 96 square inches in an area with the smallest dimension exceeding six inches and not visible from a public or private vehicular access way shall be protected in the following manner: i) Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing; or The following window barriers may be used but shall be secured with non - removable bolts: i) Inside or outside iron bars of at least 2 inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material, spaced not more than five inches apart and securely fastened; or i) J) ii) Inside or outside iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with not more than a two -inch mesh and securely fastened. If a side or rear window is of the type that can be opened, it shall, where applicable, be secured on the inside with either a slide bar, bolt, crossbar, auxiliary locking device, and /or padlock with hardened steel shackle, a minimum four pin tumbler operation. The protective bars or grills shall not interfere the operation of opening windows if such windows required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. 163. Roof openings shall be equipped as follows: with are a) All skylights on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be provided with: i) Rated burglary resistant glazing; or Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 42 ii) Iron bars of at least 2 inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material under the skylight and securely fastened; or iii) A steel grill of at least 1/8 inch material with a maximum two -inch mesh under the skylight and securely fastened. b) All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured as follows: i) If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least sixteen U.S. gauge sheet metal, or its equivalent, attached with screws. ii) The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with slide bar or slide bolts. iii) Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with non - removable pins when using pin -type hinges. c) All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 96 square inches on the roof or exterior walls of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured by covering the same with either of the following: i) Iron bars of at least 2 inch round or one inch by 1/4 inch flat steel material spaced no more than five inches apart and securely fastened; or Iron or steel grills of at least 1/8 inch material with a maximum two -inch mesh and securely fastened. If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with bolts, which are non - removable from the exterior. iv) The above (i and ii) must not interfere with venting requirements creating a potentially hazardous condition to health and safety or conflict with the provisions of the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code. 164. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a casehardened hasp, secured with non - removable screws or bolts. Hinges on the cover will be provided with non - removable pins when using pin -type hinges. If a padlock is used, it shall ,' or Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 43 have a hardened steel shackle, and a minimum five -pin tumbler key when in an unlocked position. The following standards shall identification and parking areas: locking at both heel and toe, operation with non - removable apply to lighting, address a) The address number of every commercial building shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness so that it shall be easily visible from the street: The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than six The in height and be of a color contrasting to the background. In addition, any business, which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway or parking lot, shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. b) All exterior commercial doors, during the hours of darkness, shall be illuminated with a minimum of two -foot candles of light. All exterior bulbs shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. c) Open parking lots, and access thereto, providing more than ten parking spaces and for use by the general public, shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one foot candle of light on the parking surface from dusk until the termination of business every operating day. 165. Mechanical Parking Gates - Emergency Override Control Devices Required: Except as otherwise provided in this section, owners or operators of controlled vehicle parking areas and private streets which use mechanical parking gates to control motor vehicle ingress or egress shall install and maintain an emergency override control device on each gate. Said device shall be a master key- operated type switch, which shall comply with City Police Department standards. Provisions of this Section shall not apply to a vehicle parking area or private street when emergency or other public service vehicles have immediate access to said parking area or private street without delay. Except as otherwise provided in this section, emergency override control devices shall be required for all said mechanical parking gates. Additional Security Requirements 166. Exterior Trash Enclosures: The Exterior Trash Enclosures shall include locking hardware which allows for the locking of the enclosures during both business and non - business hours. Unlocked trash enclosures Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 44 provide an attractive hiding place for the storage of merchandise during employee theft enclosures near employee parking Particularly those enclosures provide P 9 stalls. Unlocked trash individuals who search attractive through tra h target s for unwelcome items. Additionally, any key or combination for a lock sshould be given to the company providing trash service. WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITION 167. The applicant shall comply with the Waterworks District No. 1 Rules and Regulations and subsequent additions or revisions, thereto, and pay applicable fees and construct needed improvements prior to receiving sewer service. Resolution No. 99 -1658 Page 45 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) CITY OF MOORPARK ) ss. I, Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 99 -1658 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 6th day of October, 1999, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Evans, Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 18th day of May 2000. Deborah S. Traffenste t, City Clerk BALL PROPERTIES 1;il%r ird J. 11,111. ,Jr.. 1'1esidcul By Hand Delivery October 5, 2002 Honorable Mayor City Council City Manager City Planning and Development Manager Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Extension of Industial Planned Development ( "IPD ") Permit #99 -1 and #99 -2, City Resolution #99 -1658 for Two Buildings Located in the Moorpark Business Center Gentle People: Approximately three years ago, CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. relocated their corporate offices and approximately 700 jobs to the Moorpark Business Center. Their owners, Chuck Burtzloff and Lisa Wilcox, purchased the buildings for the relocation and refurbishment of CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. Shortly after purchasing the existing Litton building, they purchased Lot 1 - and Lot 16 that are located contiguous to the existing Litton building. This acquistion was or expansion of the CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. operation. Along with the Gcquisition, the above mentioned IPD and +90% plans were also acquired as part of the purchase. Unfortunately, the ownership and myself were buried in completing the existing building for occupancy and neglected to start construction on the new buildings as required by the IPD. We mistakenly thought that we had one more year to complete the plans for building permit Page 1 of 3 CC ATTACHMENT 3 312�1u 0A Crest Ihive- Suit(- 1 ;U • \VCi iIAc ViIia,(% CA 9 130 1 j31II) ;U;- , -211U • 1';u (Y, 11;1 ill,- U��. -i CA2002 \Cardservice Lot 15 & WMinor.Modification.1052002.wpd October 5, 2002 and start construction. Obviously, we were wrong. Earlier this year the project for refurbishment of the Litton building was corilpleted, and CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. has occupied the building. The owners of the buildings and the aforementioned land, Calabasas BCD, -nc. now want to complete the plans and obtain building permits for the two buildings that wCre previously approved by the City of Moorpark. But, alas, the time has run out! The owners and Ball Properties are requesting the Planning Commission and/or the City Council to extend the above permits for one more year so that the ownership can complete the plans, obtain the necessary approvals, pay the fees to the various, an nur serous agencies, so that they can commence the construction of the two buildings previously approved by the City. If the City approves this extension, we estimate that we can complete the plans and necessary specifications required by the City and other governmental agencies within :iine to twelve months. It then takes another three to four months to obtain fee amounts, p::y the fees and sign -offs of all the different agencies that are involved (Ventura County Water Works, School District, Fire Department, etc.), which then allows the City to issue permits. Therefore, we are pleading for an extension of eighteen months of the IPD so that these tasks can be completed. Specifically, we are asking the City to revise City Resolution No. 99 -1658, Department of Community Development Conditions - General Requirements, Use Ina: guration, Condition 5., which states: That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The director of community Development may, at his or her discretion, grant up to or.,� (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there ha% e been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if Applicant can document that he has diligently worked t -wards inauguration of the project during the initial two year period. The request for extension of this entitlement must be m"de in writing, at least thli../ (30) days prior to the expiration date of the per nit. Since CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. was actively pursuing the zomptete Page 2 of 3 4� � �1° ) t_;- I C: \2002 \Cardservice Lot 15 & 16 \Mi nor. Modification. 1052002.wpd October 5, 2002 refurbishment of the exit*- Litton building, at a cost that exceeded $34 mi:lion dollars, they have effectively been working on the entire project, which includes Lot 15 and Lot 16, for their ultimate build -out. In essence, CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Lnc. has been working on the project, as Lot 15 and Lot 16 are only one component of many that are required for their ultimate build -out. For the above reasons, the owners are asking that the condition be modified as follows: Department of Community Development Conditions - General Requirements, Use Inauguration, Condition 5. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than June 6, 2004, this permit shall expire. The Community and Development Director shall have sole authority to cancel this permit by the Director at any time if diligent progress is not made by the applicant. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely] d rdJB r Chuck Burtzloff / Calabasas BCD, Inc Lisa Wilcox / Calabasas BCD, Inc. Don Headlund, President / CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. C: \2002 \Cardservice Lot 15 & 16 \Minor. Modification.1052002.wpd Page 3 of 3 G `` 0 "" "� SITE MAP CC ATTACHMENT 4 PROJECT DATA www.ti i�.�r —•• � 1 A� �mweaTAAA. 'I �.�.� Z � -� ��wm1� '\ ; ��i•�ws�.�e 'nwi° ��r�i'a�f A. �! WOOL ,Q rr < a. SECTION AT LA AVE LANDSCAPNO 14 � gmjum� resew f!• � ®dQ fiAi. V •4 •ra PA.TW BiYATOT AT .NQA.T$! pm• MALL t ./n • M ■ -4j* V / p AAA i �+�►� �, / I . • �, d�ipLt aw A /• , TAI• - 2 r TPOT {�AM�rw. IOtt AA�i'/ rAM. o.v AT VA . 9. /TAM jl WIN ....d. At V=. 39 ttMttp v. SODOM AT Vim., Mm ��� � •. ' TOIp AA4�.f/11� ! : Tor& TOAt'. f.AtIll / oa.l.ts Sm A T.OT f,GM .AA : OM • Tmm RUB NSA • UA. -° • -- _... __.._... • TTAT.L AAA • �rf � �AA.A \ -- SAN .O.Q ATM." I.aMl rAO .ArA ATVA.MA +.w...... -- rr..A•fAM?.TVA.s� w. •wa+e a V� .. ITA l TOTAL AO.O. f OAA rO ._.. _._. _ ' w•.r TOTAL TOO.f.A0 IFcom TI •• i I r - sD• -D' I A AIILM LAW ARM: ii. AOOI MM OL 111111 AAA • AA. •I• OMO TOTAL • TAM. I 100111UT � 1A. 4A POSSAM, M. AAA TAB. AAA . T.O.. OAS. A L/•GIM..AA M A0.11 APIA . LA.I . OO SECTION AT REAR PROPERTY LPE XEYSTONE' WALL IY W � S• Ln L) � yd u . z I E- w z ' E-1 E » �~ or M M a1w. ' I p q ELDD I oq� •• -. �A��A ..ATN 1�w�A •MMI. •� _�A..�iA SITE PLAN ,. IaT. sr.e.mLAa Toga AaA �LiR'ssstr•- r - sD• -D' I A AIILM LAW ARM: ii. AOOI MM OL 111111 AAA • AA. •I• OMO TOTAL • TAM. I 100111UT � 1A. 4A POSSAM, M. AAA TAB. AAA . T.O.. OAS. A L/•GIM..AA M A0.11 APIA . LA.I . OO SECTION AT REAR PROPERTY LPE XEYSTONE' WALL IY W � S• Ln L) � yd u . z I E- w z ' E-1 E u�r. • � war �r SECTCN AT LA AVE LANDSCAMG ►ARML a"AMN AT {NaNTEO KMEW WALL STE RAN r T laa i' S F P 9 4 1999 FAMOORPARK ,;;2 ERMEGT DATA now wslewAw rs..r. . as Y-Omi .am ova �mum ®� AM Alavomm/ �e� vwi• I.A r ow.lwa Am GOL4 MMM SM& W dommummilL sm"OA.. Mid ONOMMEJOANLj &Al rw TAw..wl, aa. qIa A.A.w w TA.wwm"v= -AIw r/rwroY Vm.wrl r. AwVI...ATVS..ws .f. rn...N Vim. Awn= wlawr.s..wls .la llw�... oaiwwr .NNwAMUNLAMLS uA IsTAIaAO...Aww owAl..l AM. woo wTa anal.. AAO. wm u �..� ..wroar.A...wrs �wualopaa/ Vm..ws ww.A.Y.w.r�.lw.a Iola A�A�.. wr. wla Ilwo♦.. wAe•. arcs lllllAjlmLaMLMSL w %me a.. M4 AI.II wow � : : " ww.rT. rr r ►.w.A.., Y r 7 ,AIa =..r. ... U�w... r IIIrAIr A.A. AA.I . r. 1 W F x� a� a 0 W � l NVW m+aw ANWAFOwr r . Mff:ry iIE3 r�o .ter= .a ©��• YrMm lop Y�Y ►1 , +r jft a, Iowa vivo iaraw cww1� �L - vmv0tRAJ" _-V AIQ LOW WALL TO SCREEN PARKING LOT NEW CHINESE PISTACHE (TYPICAL) 1' EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED NEW CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE (TYPICAL) EXISTING 5 SYCAMORES TO REMAIN ON CONDOR DRIVE 6661Qc d3S LANDSCAPE CONCEPT _ _ a3Ai333U ... I.R.r.. ,.•, w.. ..I. 1-11 —_ rNr. te.ew .N.ut f wc..ew, Ie N.r Ktl fuCYrrryf le N w.00. WHERE NO CONFLICT OCCURS WITH WALI 1 •IKn r0 K wWiO 10 CN•r1 0.w.l.n . YKn r0 M Kwwl. r0 I.c.Ur.l1 • frq.cl. MaYr COtVI TM _, ..1 1n •i11,f .n a1 . NrN• rNlf ra wr. 3. TO OCCUR* PLANTING POCKETS 3awYanreanw.l. 1 YKH Y. i Nnl. 10 a N.wtO r0 r•CYn.I YNN.i P tw...i IN ROWS EVERY 32' VERTICALLY N »l. 1§1 Co. r0iwwa I1. [1rW.w. An M r1...n WE w Iw eta .N 10 IKK.rt ., wc. •1 LYf "1 9" e• •K fnl rr. laf .R.R wLL c0.n.w 0 eO.wIR. Y ■■1 I.1 I•.ol / V �.C•W■If w. IM UM a. ce.oe...tlrt tKft"Ief • wC. 0ol 1Kn wu K ta.r10 10 Iw wll.i. K Iw 4R. CK ~000.1 r Rl K .n 911 . lr. r•...o Ill 1 Q• "49.1 10 I.t 0-1.c I0 n0.q pt G Itolln •n0 IW Cap Y r.ww. 1.N t.nlf fo.. G~S C094 a Iw wrl, 1.r[ ■■1 K ol—t0 .1 w. FA .4XI"oo'.'.u.'0 ^' «'Ye1ff I. �.:I.Or.O :e y:"Mf - '.:...� IC,I,O w 1y'L•01.1i I, M — w ol+e oo 10 :aielW rote..nCrw U C.n.1 m 'wt YD1[ rKta ¢: t_rnln. w .° FLOWERING ARISTOCRAT PEAR TREES --- w. LOW WALL TO SCREEN PARKING LOT NEW CHINESE PISTACHE (TYPICAL) 1' EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED NEW CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE (TYPICAL) EXISTING 5 SYCAMORES TO REMAIN ON CONDOR DRIVE (1) NEW PEPPER TREE 1K.L WR t� I \ N I \1 \I:t �N NEW EVERGREEN ELM (TYPICAL) EXISTING PEPPER TREES ON SLOPE TO REM-' WHERE NO CONFLICT OCCURS WITH WALI w TM _, ..1 Iyt MK 1/w00c0[ 3. TO OCCUR* PLANTING POCKETS n p IN ROWS EVERY 32' VERTICALLY n.on AND 18' HORIZONTALLY •111'Is" R•C of I..03 M FA •:a+u� ■.1.. ¢: t_rnln. w 1 r. • �.. +ew+ w.a rrr..r � . sr..rca..r. ... •IM.V•■..rl s.n ,.l ` .iw +.T 11 YrIM Wl fM r..M .K..f• :«, ry r .x � - .wI.JM cfr ...fi'r �w•9 �.4 MYI I S.. KI JJr'.V '�¢' •67[_' ••� P _ r•.e■... yao fY awi wYI 1.. O7s•V W - -!• nw .•w.r ..II 1'1i wt<.R ..•T 4. f.. ! A • 1r J r. roll f. T : W I.O•l K .N: w.!r 11.41 N1.. •.wV -.: r. t' wA 4 «wN rQrM )�• �II•i Arlr.. n1 w. tiN >WaN1.1 !r rn.I (1) NEW PEPPER TREE 1K.L WR t� I \ N I \1 \I:t �N NEW EVERGREEN ELM (TYPICAL) EXISTING PEPPER TREES ON SLOPE TO REM-' WHERE NO CONFLICT OCCURS WITH WALI "WY LANDSCAPED KEYSTONE CRIS WALL Iyt MK 1/w00c0[ 3. TO OCCUR* PLANTING POCKETS n p IN ROWS EVERY 32' VERTICALLY n.on AND 18' HORIZONTALLY •111'Is" R•C of I..03 M FA CONDOR DRIVE -"v— - w EXISTING 3 EUCALYPTUS CLUSTERS -TO REMAIN ON CONDOR AVENUE 0 NDSCAPE CALCULATIONS 1K.L WR a.r. 1.1.134 ■ 100 aAanw 11 ..af. Us, a Iyt MK 1/w00c0[ a.10a . /..IM n p r..a.i Isr n.on •111'Is" R•C of I..03 M .DR a1 ,la tt was ,Aw Com tKro..m .. r= ME49JK AM ME! N 1LOCIED MKV" NEW EUCALYPTUS (KCAL) H Z uj :21 a- c og Li o� NEW WATER GUM TREES r EVERY 20' ON BENCH U cy iiimpluar- 50904 aw 4/4/09 LANDSCA PLAN SCALE- t•_ 20' -0• L—O IIIII wigwams � IIIII �riili� «���� i 1 111111111111 1��1111111111� 1 Emmons IIIII i:UMMENINS ..��IN Mmlmmiiiliiii iiiiiiiiiiii■ 011111med L ... 'III _ AND IIIIII� III�'ll illll fill ru 1111 111111 I1�l11 IIIII 1 111 i- ITEM,--,-- 9-.-A . 114 -Y ITEM NO. 9.A. Consider Presentation by Starett Kressman, Ventura County Libraries. No Staff Report 0000,2S-9 ITEM __ R • B . A - -a Acs MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to the Planning Commission BACKGROUND The Planning Commission consists of five members who serve two -year terms. All five seats on the Planning Commission must be appointed at this time, due to expiration of the two -year term. Applications were due on November 18, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Fourteen (14) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: DeGuardi, Jonathon DiCecco, Mark Galloway, Rick Gray, Richard Haller, Paul Horn, Larry Jackson, Wayne Landis, Kipp Lauletta, David McGrath, Jeffrey Moore, Jay Panossian, Natalie Peskay, Robert Pozza, Scott The City Council's current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926, sets forth the Council policies for citizen appointments to boards, commissions, and committees. The Council policies have been 0001 0IS/'0 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 followed for the posting and publication of notice of the vacancies. Chapter 2.36 of the Municipal Code sets forth the regulations for the appointment of the Planning Commission as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. B. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. C. A second shall be required. D. The Council shall vote on each appointment to the Commission individually. The City Council's Policies Resolution includes an additional step prior to Step B., above, as follows: Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. STAFF RECOMMNDATION Appoint five (5) Planning Commissioners to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. GCO'O( ". � ( iii ^I' SonT�r ,,R T<.,, R ,[,4F�°5 & of Ac; t ct -, 03 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL`S AGENDA REPORT 11V: TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commission BACKGROUND The Parks and Recreation Commission consists of five members who serve two -year terms. All five seats on the Parks and Recreation Commission must be appointed at this time, due to expiration of the two -year term. Applications were due on November 18, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Thirteen (13) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: Bobertz, Kenneth Catrambone, Joseph Cooper, Rudy DeGuardi, Jonathon Goodall, Mike Gullo, Guy Koning, Katie McNamara, David Moore, Jay Pflaumer, Thomas Shigemitsu, Laura Thompson, Sandra Weisberger, Julie The City Council's current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926, sets forth the Council policies for citizen appointments to boards, commissions, and committees. The Council policies have been 00 ;0 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 followed for the posting and publication of notice of the vacancies. Chapter 2.32 of the Municipal Code sets forth the regulations for the appointment of the Parks and Recreation Commission as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. B. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. C. A second shall be required. D. The Council shall vote on each appointment to the Commission individually. The City Council's Policies Resolution includes an additional step prior to Step B., above, as follows: Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. STAFF RECOHMNDATION Appoint five (5) Parks and Recreation Commissioners to serve a two - year term ending December 2004. 09 1031 ITEM �9 ..:.� fltLsre.ee� lC��t'- E'y/J tr.ntL- L %��4 -crt°� MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk _1':5/ DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to the Senior Center Advisory Committee BACKGROUND The Senior Center Advisory Committee consists of five members who serve two -year terms. All five seats on the Committee expire in December 2002. Applications were due on November 14, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Five (5) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: Abramson, Morrie Moser, Robert Murphy, Mary Lou Walker, Nancee Woolsey, Carole The City Council's forth the Council commissions, and followed for the vacancies. The Coi appointments shall current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926 sets policies for citizen appointments to boards, committees. The Council policies have been posting and publication of notice of the incil's resolution states that the procedure for be as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. 0 00OS Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECOM- IENDATION Appoint five (5) Senior Center Advisory Committee members to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. G() 0 ITEM ADO.- MOORPARK CITY COUNCILT'- AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk 1,j) S5 1 DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to the Public Art Advisory Committee BACKGROUND The City of Moorpark appoints two public representatives to the City's Public Art Advisory Committee, which also includes one Parks and Recreation Commissioner and two Councilmembers. The public appointments expire in December 2002. Applications were due on November 15, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Four (4) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: Hauenstein, Cliff Kenton, George Medvez, Andrew Moore, Jay The City Council's current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926 sets forth the Council policies for citizen appointments to boards, commissions, and committees. The Council policies have been followed for the posting and publication of notice of the vacancies. The Council's resolution states that the procedure for appointments shall be as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. ()000 9 fS Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECON VIENDATION Appoint two (2) public representatives to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. O(N;O:)7 ITEM --- __9 • F. 13 _cl tC/ .Lli d-Z c z et 0_. ._ 4'd " MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL ]yhlucu_ee �cau+ -�� AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk 5T DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee BACKGROUND The City of Moorpark appoints two representatives and one alternate to the Ventura County Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee. The appointments expire on December 31, 2002. Applications were due on November 20, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Two (2) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: Bing, Donald Squire, Gerald John Brand,, Senior Management Analyst, has previously been appointed by the City Council as the alternate. Staff recommends that Mr. Brand be again appointed as the alternate. The City Council's forth the Council commissions, and followed for the vacancies. The Coi appointments shall current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926 sets policies for citizen appointments to boards, committees. The Council policies have been posting and publication of notice of the incil's resolution states that the procedure for be as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. C1Q& 1!:)8 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order'to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECONMNDATION Appoint two (2) representatives and one (1) alternate to serve a two -year term ending December 2004. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council I 9 - G . Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk -1) 5-T— November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) Consider Appointment to the Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee The City of Moorpark appoints one public member representative to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee. The appointment expires in January 2003. Applications were due on November 15, 2002, by 5:00 p.m. Two (2) applications were received, and a copy of each application was previously provided to the Council for review. The appointment for the Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee is for a four -year term. DISCUSSION Following is a list of the applicant names from those applications received by the close of the filing period: Kinsella, Ryan Poleri, William The City Council's current Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926 sets forth the Council policies for citizen appointments to boards, commissions, and committees. The Council policies have been followed for the posting and publication of notice of the vacancy. The Council's resolution states that the procedure for appointments shall be as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. GCI0 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Appoint one (1) representative to serve a four -year term ending January 2007. (11 0C;' ".L v:' ITEM q • A - Er MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL J�,JOO,? AGENDA REPORT lL ax2c AL �� -�-u�� •3.55 �,�- /�. TO: Honorable City Council L RA"Xac -,-- 6e FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk � %0-r DATE: November 26 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING REVISED CITY COUNCIL POLICIES RESOLUTION AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -1926 BACKGROUND Section 16 of the City Council's Policies Resolution No. 2001 -1926 requires that the Council Policies resolution shall be updated from time to time as needed but not less often than following each General Municipal Election beginning in 1998. Given that a General Municipal Election was held on November 5, 2002, the Council should review the policies to determine the need for updating. Staff is recommending numerous revisions as discussed below. DISCUSSION Staff proposed revisions to the Council policies are shown through use of legislative format on the attached draft resolution. The reasons for staff recommended revisions are generally as follows: • Policy 4, Reports from Appointees, was updated to reference current names of committees and commissions for which a report is required. • Policy 5, Advertising and Appointment Policy for Citizen Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, was updated to reflect current advertisement practice and to improve organization of this section. • Policy 6, Senior Center Advisory Committee, was added to consolidate the previously adopted guidelines into the Council Policies resolution. Additional language was added to provide more consistency with the Teen Council policy language and with the Appointment Policy language in Policy 5. • Policy 7, Teen Council, was added to consolidate the previously adopted guidelines into the Council Policies resolution. Additional language was added to clarify what constitutes a r� G 0 ;100 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 quorum and to provide more consistency with the Appointment Policy language in Policy S. • Policy 8, City Council Standing Committees, was revised to reflect that appointments to Standing Committees shall be made at the first regularly scheduled meeting in January of each odd - numbered year and at the reorganization meeting of the City Council in each even - numbered year, and was also revised to correct assigned staff titles. • Policy 9, Process for Preparation of Initial Drafts of Ordinances by City Departments, was revised to reflect that the draft ordinance will be e- mailed to the City Attorney for review. • Policy 14, Conflict of Interest Appraisal, was updated to reflect the reason for a conflict of interest appraisal to be done (provide proof and rebut the presumption that the financial effect of a governmental decision on real property in which a public official has an economic interest is presumed to be material). • Policy 16, Harassment in the Workplace, completely replaces the prior Sexual Harassment Policy. The new Harassment in the Workplace policy is based on current law and is consistent with the policy recommended by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority for employees. In addition to employees, the new policy language also references volunteers and is intended to be provided to all employees and volunteers to provide guidelines for prohibiting and preventing unlawful harassment in the workplace. In addition to the above described revisions to policies, there were other minor editorial corrections made to staff titles. Policies were renumbered to reflect the addition of the two new policies (Senior Center Advisory Committee and Teen Council). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002- Attachment: Draft Resolution 0 ()0'.0 fl. k ) RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING COUNCIL POLICIES'. AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -1926 WHEREAS, it is advantageous for the City Council to have a compilation of its policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed that its policies be compiled and adopted as a resolution; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2001 -1926 adopting revised Council Policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that revisions are required to update existing policies and add new policies. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. POLICY 1 - STREET NAMING All street names shall be approved by the City Council subject to the concurrence of the County Fire Department. The following criteria shall be used: North /South streets shall be designated as avenues or roads; East /West streets as streets or drives; and cul- de -sacs as circles, courts or places. SECTION 2. POLICY 2 - REPAYMENT DOCUMENTS FOR VILLA CAMPESINA DEFERRED LOANS The City Manager is authorized to execute all deferred loan repayment documents for Villa Campesina Affordable Housing Development (Tract 4147). SECTION 3. POLICY 3 - MEETING AND CONFERENCE EXPENSE On various occasions it will be necessary for City Officials, elected and appointed, and staff to attend meetings outside the City or County on City business. Such occasions fall basically into three categories: 1. Meetings /Seminars /Training Sessions, which do not require overnight accommodations; and C' C, 0 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 2 2. Conferences /Training Sessions requiring overnight accommodations, or which require an expenditure exceeding $250.00; and 3. Travel for regular /special meetings. A. Meetings /Seminars /Training Sessions (one day and return) 1) The costs of registration, meals, parking and mileage are allowable City expenses. Attendance at City expense shall be subject to the advance approval of the City Manager. 2) An individual proposing to attend at City expense shall file a rough -draft copy of the Claim for Reimbursement of Travel Expenses with the City Manager at least 24 hours prior to the date of attendance. 3) The City Manager shall not approve such attendance unless funds have been appropriated and are available for the subject purpose. 4) Wherever possible, registration fees will be paid in advance by the City. The individual attending shall advance all other necessary costs. 5) Upon return to the City, the individual attending shall complete the Claim for Reimbursement of Travel Expense, in final form, and submit it to the City Manager for reimbursement. B. Conferences /Training Sessions (Requiring Lodging) 1) The costs of registration, lodging, meals, parking and mileage are allowable City expenses. Attendance at City expense shall be subject to the advance approval of the City Manager, if funds have been appropriated for the travel. Otherwise, it shall require approval and an appropriation of funds by the City Council. 2) The individual attending shall file a rough -draft copy of the Claim for Reimbursement of Travel Expenses with the City Manager, at least one week prior to the City Council Meeting proceeding the date of the Conference /Training Session. G () 4) 15 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 3 3) The City Manager shall determine whether funds have been appropriated and are available for said proposed expenditure and shall either approve /disapprove the travel or refer to the City Council and recommend attendance /non- attendance based on the availability of funds, proposed content of the meeting and other meetings in the same general subject area which may be scheduled later during the budget year. 4) After approval by the City Manager or City Council, staff will, if possible, make advance arrangements to pay registration and lodging fees and to make an advance payment in the amount not to exceed 1000 of the balance of the estimated cost. 5) Upon return to the City, the individual attending shall complete the Claim for Reimbursement of Travel Expenses, in final form with supporting receipts or cash tickets, and submit it within 10 days of their return to the City Manager for reimbursement, or refund of any overage. Total receipts for meals and associated tips will be honored up to $50.00 per day based on the following limits of $10.00 for breakfast, $15.00 for lunch and $25.00 for dinner. Meals can be combined. 6) The traveler may receive a per diem allowance for meals plus tips. The per diem allowance shall conform to the currently allowed Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allowance for California cities. It shall be prorated when appropriate. 7) When the individual attending an approved conference is accompanied by his or her spouse or another companion, the allowable cost for lodging shall be only that which would be allowed if the individual were traveling alone. The lodging and all other expenses of the spouse or traveling companion are personal and not reimbursable by the City. C. Staff Travel - Regular /Special Meetings Staff assigned or directed by the City Manager to attend area meetings, or special meetings which are scheduled from time to time during the regular course of business, shall be reimbursed for actual mileage, meals and other appropriate expenses on an actual cost basis. Staff 0Q�'1 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 4 members receiving a travel allowance will be reimbursed for actual mileage for trips on City business outside of the six county area (Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange). Mileage will be calculated from the City as point of departure to the destination. Mileage expense for the use of a personal vehicle for travel shall be at the rate currently allowed by the Internal Revenue Service provided, however, that the total expense of said travel shall not exceed the combined total of the round -trip air fare to the destination, plus the private vehicle mileage expense to and from the airport and appropriate parking fees. Attendance at a special meeting, for which funds are not appropriated, in Sacramento /Washington, D.C. or other City at which attendance by the City of Moorpark is deemed urgent, and which occurs at a time which precludes advance approval by the Council as a whole, may be authorized by the Mayor and one other member of the City Council, subject to the ratification of the expense and appropriation of funds at the next regular Council Meeting. D. Council and Commissioner Expenses The travel and expense reimbursement of members of the Council, the Planning Commission, and the Parks, and Recreation Commission shall be governed by the same rules contained in this policy with the following exception. The certified Claim for Expense Reimbursement form shall be reviewed and subject to the approval of the City Council Budget and Finance Committee. If a member of the Budget and Finance Committee submits a Claim for Expense Reimbursement, it shall be subject to the approval of the two most senior, by tenure, members of the City Council who are not members of the Budget and Finance Committee. SECTION 4. POLICY 4 - REPORTS FROM APPOINTEES 1. Reports are required from appointees to the following: Area Agency on Aging Area Housing Authority Mee:Fpa�FI= Mesgiiite Abatement, D4 + riet Ve_. u_ a Gei:inty Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee 00)0 6,7 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 5 2. A report shall be required for each scheduled meeting of the agency, authority, district, commission or committee and is due in written form to the City Council five (5) days following the meeting. In lieu of a written report, an oral report may be presented to the Council under the public comment portion of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after the meeting of the agency, authority, district, etc. 3. Where the City is represented by more than one person, the appointees shall coordinate and collaborate their efforts so only one report is presented to the Council. 4. If neither the appointee nor alternate is in attendance at a meeting of the agency, authority, district, etc., or if the meeting is canceled, that will be reported to the Council by the appointee(s) as prescribed above. SECTION 5. POLICY 5 - ADVERTISING AND APPOINTMENT POLICY FOR CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES 1. At the end of each calendar year, an Appointments =List will be prepared and posted at the City Community Center, and Moo--park Library, City Home Page, and local government ca>nel, of all citizen appointive positions and their expiring term of office (in compliance with theMaddy Act r-eau...r_ements). A contact number and request for communication with the City Clerk will be included, to allow residents to obtain information on as ° !as any requirements for the appointed position, and to facilitate communication, with the ........._....._ ........ ..........._................ - -- - - - - -- -- -- _ _ _—_.... _.....- _— ..._.......--- ...._... - - ....._......._.__......... .._._ Clity Clerk in the event a citizen has an interest in being placed on the appointee resource list. The Appointments -IList shall remain posted for the month of January. 2. Not later than enef��30 days prior to the expiring term of office of a citizen appointee, the City Clerk will —,west a A e- e he e� g lcei=fft -- and --a e ve -a—n-e w s p��� - e€ .mien prepare and distribute a press release to all n=ewspapers of local distribution and radio stations that have requested such notice, advertising the citizen appointment opportunity. The City Clerk will also post such notice on the City's Home Page, local government channel, and at the City Community Center. 3. Interested persons will be asked to submit a City Board, Commission, and Committee Application. ■R �i ` �; yy , _ Resolution No. 2002 - Page 6 4. When an unscheduled vacancy occurs on the Planning Commission, e-r- Parks and Recreation Commission, or other City Council appointed board, commission, or committee, notice will be posted (in compliance with the Maddy Act requirements), and advertisement of the citizen appointment opportunity will be initiated by the City Clerk in the same manner as for an expir ing term, unless the City Council determines_ that the vacancy wi.11 not be filled due to the length of the remaining germ of office. 5. The City Clerk shall maintain a resource list of citizens who have expressed an interest in serving as appointees on advisory boards, commissions and committees and will have t-hefft ,e�'-et—emai1 an application at the time of the next advertisement. The M Mill • Si --A izieitiee EeeramC- ing eveL =y yaec`i .. a requeswrz. i- ♦. G e.k i in the eJOi'CITL a fir- interest Gity list. y en the appeintee riesedr-ee Si --A izieitiee EeeramC- ing eveL =y yaec`i r Gity y has interest in being en e��erit a eitiFen an plaeed 6. Tr order to be considered for City Council appointment to a board, commission, or committee, the applicant must be a resident of the City of Moorpark and shall also be a registered voter, with the exception that there is no registered voter .requirement for Teen Council. - 4_'i'. As per Government Code Section 40605, the Mayor shall make all appointments to boards, commissions and committees. =-48. The procedure for appointments shall be as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 7 B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall then make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. SECTION 6. POLICY 6 - SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1. Purpose The Senior Center Advisory Committee is intended to assist with the development of programs and activities of interest to local seniors and facilitate communication ._....._.......--- .....__._... between City staff and senior adult participants. 2. Membership and Organization All appointments to the Senior Center, Advi.sory Committee shall be made by the Mayor of the City of Moorpark, with approval of the City Council, consistent with the adopted Council. — policy__ on procedure for appointments. The Committee shall consist of five members, age 60 or older. The Senior Center Advisory Committee members shall be residents and registered voters of the City. The term of the appointment shall be for _years_ . if a vacancy occurs otherwise than by expiration of a term, an appointment may be made to fill the unexpired portion of the term of office in accordance with Policy 5 of this resolution (Advertising and Appointment. Policy for Citizen- Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees) . The appointment for a new two -year term shall occur at the reorganization meeting of the City Council held every even - numbered year in . — - .— ._......_..__.......- - -- Po_icv 5 of this resolution. If there are three (3) consecutive, unexcused or excused absences, or five (5) total absences during the term of a Senior Center Advisory Committee member, the seat of such member shall be deemed immediately vacant. Vacancies shall be filled in a manner that is consistent with Policy 5. 600 :011 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 8 The Senior Center Advisory Committee shall conduct itself in an orderly fashion at all meetings and shall follow and obey the standing rules established by the Community Services Department. No member of the Senior Center Advisory Committee shall use the title of Senior or Center Advisory Committee member .... . ..... .............. on any form of communication unless authorized by the Community Services Director and then channeled through the Senior Center Advisory Committee for approval. The Senior Center Advisory Committee shall not present or purport to represent any position, policy, or direction for the City of Moorpark without the prior approval of the Citv Council. The Senior Center Advisory Committee shall-1-hold monthly meetings at the Senior Center at a day and time approved by the Committee at the first annual meeting. Meetings shall be open to all interested participants. The Committee shall annually elect its chair and vice-chair from its appointed Lnted members. City staff w-LI'L attend all ................... meetings and provide administrative support to the ................... Committee. 3. Duties and Responsibilities A. Assist in the selection and Planning of activities and programs of interest to seniors, -1.-.c-'ud-ing special events and holiday programs, by bringing forth ideas and suggestions. B. Serve as program host/hostess by encouraging other seniors to participate, assist with activity registration and related program details. C Advise Community Services Department staff as to specific and changing needs of participating and non-participating seniors so that appropriate . . . . . ......... activities may be scheduled. D. Assist with program surveys and evaluations. E. Assist with dissemination of public -L nformatJ.on of interest-- to seniors through word of mouth and by activei-v participating in programs. F Provide liaisons with various community organizations that offer programs and services to G 0 ) I I. i Resolution No. 2002 - Page 9 seniors by bringing outside information to the Senior Center. G. Discuss and make recommendations to staff as to policies and procedures related to the operation and scheduling of the Senior Center. H. Participate in preparation of an annual report to the Citv Council. SECTION 7. POLICY 7 - TEEN COUNCIL 1. Purpose The purpose of the Teen Council shall be to investigate and make recommendations to City staff on recreational programming and other matters of concern to Moorpark teens, and such other duties and functions as may be specifically assigned to the Teen Council by the City Council Goals To encourage young residents to actively participate in the operations of their City government in a positive and productive manner. To provide a mechanism - which facilitates communication and a .........._.._... _._...._ ....................... _ ..... ---- ... _. ... -- - -- - .... - -- spi_r:i_t of ._evolvement by voutrn in CA. ov ty government. t. provide a learning experience for 'Peen Council members that is conductive to leadership growth. :3. Membership and Orqanization '—, appointments to the Teen: Council shall be made by the Mayer of the C' ty of Moorpark, with approval of the City Cour_cii, consistent with the adopted Council policy on procedure for appointments (Policy 5). The Teen Council shall consist of no less than seven: (7) and no more than eleven (11) members, with a goal of having a minimum of one (1) representative from each grade level from 7"' grade to 12`1 grade. All representatives must be City of Moorpark residents and mush be enrolled in school. Special attention should be given to insure that all middle schools and '_nigh schools in Moorpark have some representation on the Teen Council. Representatives ..._._...... ..._.___..._.- _.._.__....___.__ -- would tvni.cally be limited to not serving more than a total of 00O) .i�"O Resolution No. 2002 - Page 10 three years on the Teen Council to allow more teens the opportunity to serve as a Teen Council representative. In addition to the advertisement procedures specified in Policy 5, applications for Teen Council shall be made available at City Hall, Arroyo Vista Recreation Center, Moorpark High _School, Moorpark Community High School, Chaparral Middle School, and Mesa Verde Middle School. Teen Council members shall each serve a one (1) -year term commencing on July 1 of each year. If there are three (3) consecutive unexcused or excused absences, or five (5) total absences during the term of a member, the seat of such member shall be deemed immediately vacant. If a vacancy occurs otherwise than by expiration of a term, an appointment may be made to fill. the unexpired portion of the term of office in accordance with Policy 5 of this resolution (Advertising and Appointment Policy for Citizen Appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees). The Teen Council shall conduct itself in an orderly fashion at all meetings and shall follow and obey the standing rules established by the Community Services Department. A meeting quorum shall- be defined as a majority of the total appointed memher�; - No _member of the _Teen Council shall use the title of Teen Council member on any form of communication unless authorized by the Community Services Director and then channeled through the Teen Council for approval. The Teen Council shall- riot present or purport to represent any posit -ion, policy, or direction for the City of Moorpark without the prior approval of the City Council. The Teen Council shall hold monthly meetings with the day, time and location to be determined at the first annual meeting of the Teen Council. Meetings shall be open to all interested participants. The Teen Council shall annually elect its chair and vice- chair from its appointed members. City staff will attend all meetings and provide administrative support to the Teen Council, including establishment of the agenda. 4. Duties and Responsibilities A. Attend all Teen Council meetings and other Teen Council activities. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 11 B. Actively participate in at least one Teen Council- subcommittee, as approved by the City staff re resentative to the Teen Council. _---p - C. Solicit, receive, and relay to City staff input and suggestions about any matters of concern to the teen residents in Moorpark_ D. Participate in publicity and promotional activities of the Teen Council. SECTION -68. POLICY -68 - CITY COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEES 1. Standing Committees The Council Standing Committees shall be: Budget and Finance Affordable Housing /Community Development Economic Development Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Transportation and Streets Each committee shall consist of two Council members and a designated alternate. One member of the Budget and Finance Committee shall be the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem. This does not preclude both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem from serving on this committee at the same time. The Budget and Finance Committee shall serve as the Mobilehome Hardship Review Panel, along with the mobilehome park owner, in compliance with Section 5.52.140.B of the Moorpark Municipal Code; however, if the Mayor is not a member of the Budget and Finance Committee, then the Mobilehome Hardship Review Panel shall consist of the Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tem along with the mobilehome park owner. 2. Committee Appointments With the approval of the majority of the members of the City Council, the Mayor shall make all appointments to Standing Committees of the City Council, including the designated alternate. The appointments shall be made at the first regularly scheduled meeting in January of each odd - numbered year and at the reorganization meeting of ' 'Lhe City Council in each even - numbered year. 3. Alternates to Committees or Resolution No. 2002 - Page 12 To avoid potential Brown Act violations of having more than two City Councilmembers consider an item at the committee level, each City Councilmember should determine: a) pursuant to applicable provisions of the Political Reform Act, if a potential conflict of interest exists (consult with the City Attorney if necessary); b) although there is no conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act, there is a desire to avoid an appearance of conflict; or c) if for other reasons a decision is made not to participate. If a Councilmember should so determine /decide not to participate, then that City Councilmember shall contact the designated alternate to serve in his /her place for that item. If the City Councilmember determines /decides not to continue participating after having been involved in Committee discussions of a specific item, he /she should contact the City Attorney to determine if the alternate can serve on the Committee for that item. If an alternate has a conflict or otherwise is not available, the Mayor shall serve or request another City Councilmember to serve. 4. Ad Hoc Committee Items shall be assigned to Standing Committees whenever possible. If not so assigned, at the Mayor's discretion, an Ad Hoc Committee shall be formed. Ad Hoc Committees are not generally subject to the provisions of the Brown Act unless composed of members other than less than a quorum of the legislative body. 5. Assigned Staff Budget and Finance - Assistant City Manager /Administrative Services Director Affordable Housing /Community Development - Di rector- of Community Development Director Economic Development - Assistant City Manager Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste - Public Works Director Transportation and Streets - Public Works Director The City Manager may designate an alternate and /or substitute as determined necessary. 6. Meeting Schedule A regular meeting schedule for Standing Committees shall be approved by minute action of the City Council at the first regularly scheduled meeting in January of each year. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 13 7. Agenda and Reports out of Committee The assigned staff person to a Council Committee will prepare an agenda for the Committee meetings. In addition, the staff person will provide action minutes to the full Council within seventy -two (72) hours of the Council Committee meeting showing the Committee's recommendation. Concurrence with the staff's recordation of Committee recommendation(s) to the full Council will be completed prior to the adjournment of the Committee meeting in order to accurately report to the full Council via the action minutes. Action minutes will not formally be approved by the Committee. 8. Committee Assignments The City Manager shall maintain a list of specific assignments for each Standing Committee. The list shall be distributed to the Mayor, City Council and City Staff each calendar quarter (January, April, July and October). 9. Items Referred to Committee Items may be referred to Committee from City Council approved objectives; by the Council at a Council meeting; by staff; or by an individual Councilmember. 10. Items Referred to the Full Council from Committee A consensus of the Committee is required to send an item back to the full Council. A consensus relative to a recommendation on the item need not have been reached. SECTION -:7-9. POLICY �9 - PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF INITIAL DRAFTS OF ORDINANCES BY CITY DEPARTMENTS (If the draft ordinance is initiated by the Planning Commission or Parks & Recreation Commission, the process may deviate from that outlined here.) 1. Step One - Staff confers with the City Attorney at a scheduled meeting after first determining if the City Manager wants to participate. Staff will bring any sample ordinance to the meeting. City Attorney to determine lead time (Step One to Step Six), except when the City Manager determines that staff priorities or Council direction require adjustment of the lead time, but generally a minimum of two weeks in most instances will be required -- possibly longer depending upon the length, complexity of the ordinance and quality of the sample GaWLI Resolution No. 2002 - Page 14 ordinances. Agenda deadlines should be considered in determining lead time. The meeting with the City Attorney shall be scheduled on the first Wednesday afternoon of the month by contacting the Executive Secretary. 2. Step Two - Staff confers with City Clerk for codification determination and section number confirmation. 3. Step Three - Staff drafts the ordinance for content and format and if necessary reviews with City Manager during the drafting process. 4. Step Four - City Manager reviews draft ordinance. 5. Step Five -- Meele E -mail draft ordinance to City Attorney. (- e r g e t the Gity Atterney's —ewe e -t-e deterfftine gwhat type --e € we i=el p r-e ess i g- file must - be e r e a t e d- to -med em the file.) 6. Step Six - City Attorney reviews for content and form; makes changes in legislative format and returns draft ordinance, making comments if required. Management staff, to the Management Analyst and Associate Planner level, who are authorized by the Department Head, may seek input directly from the City Attorney. 7. Step Seven - Staff reviews changes made by City Attorney, if any, and discusses with City Attorney and City Manager as needed. Meeting with City Attorney to be scheduled on the first Wednesday afternoon of the month. 8. Step Eight - Recognize and reconcile differences. If differences cannot be reconciled, talk to the City Manager, if still unable to reconcile differences, write the staff report to recognize the points of disagreement. 9. Step Nine - If needed, schedule public hearing after City Attorney and City Manager have approved the draft ordinance. SECTION 410. POLICY --10 - TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FEE WAIVERS 1. Once each calendar year, a City of Moorpark organization having non - profit status may apply for and be granted a temporary use permit fee waiver for one event. 2. The ireeteref Community Development Director shall waive a Temporary Use Permit Fee pursuant to this Policy after an eligible organization has submitted: a) a completed temporary W,"d 1IJIL7 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 15 use permit application; b) a request for fee waiver; and c) proof of non - profit status. 3. Examples for which Temporary Use Permits are issued are special events such as Christmas tree sales, promotional parking lot sales, church carnivals, Country Days and sidewalk sales. 4. The Temporary Use Permit shall be issued for a single event of less than thirty (30) consecutive days in duration. SECTION 411. POLICY -911 - NON- PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ANNUAL FACILITY RESERVATION POLICY 1. Once each calendar year, a City of Moorpark organization having a non - profit status, may reserve the Arroyo Vista Recreation Center or the Moorpark Community Center to hold one (1) event with only direct staff costs being charged to that organization. 2. Those events which qualify shall be of a nature whereby the benefit of the event will serve the community and /or involve all those City residents who are interested in this event. Examples for which these procedures may apply include citywide events by Girl or Boy Scouts, service organization events, including fund - raising activities, and special events, such as Country Days, which have a direct benefit to City residents. 3. Regular organizational meetings or activities shall not qualify for this reduced fee. 4. Direct staff costs shall be defined as hourly staff costs, including all personnel benefit costs required for the event. 5. The 91L=ee:�ef of Community Services Director shall waive the standard rental fees pursuant to these procedures after an eligible organization has submitted: a) a completed Facility Reservation Form; b) a request for fee waiver; and c) proof of non - profit status. 6. One -time events shall further be defined as an event for one day per calendar year, not to exceed twelve (12) hours. 7. City staff shall maintain a record of each organization's request for the one - time -event fee, and shall notify the organization if they have already used their one - time -event option within a calendar year. 000.1` 8 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 16 SECTION 1-G2. POLICY 1mG2 - GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE CITY'S SERVICES ACCOUNT SOCIAL 1. Each Councilmember and the City Manager is authorized to expend funds as the need may arise and receive reimbursement for said expenditures from the City's Social Services Account up to an amount not to exceed $200 per occurrence when said individual has made this determination. 2. When said expenditure is made, the individual will cause the reimbursement request to be placed on the City Council's next regular meeting agenda for approval by the City Council. SECTION 113. POLICY 113 - REFUNDS FOR BUSINESS REGISTRATION The City will not issue refunds for business registration permits. SECTION 11'!274. POLICY 1t4 - FLAG ETIQUETTE 1. The Flag of the United States of America and the Flag of the State of California will be displayed at each municipal facility which has an appropriate flagpole. 2. The National and State Flags are to be displayed daily from the start of the business day through the close of the business day during the normal work week. Flags may be flown 24 hours per day if appropriately lighted. 3. Flag etiquette allows the flag to be displayed during inclement weather provided it is made of all weather material (such as the flags the City uses). If it rains after raising of the flag, the flag will remain on the pole. If it is raining prior to raising the flag, the flag will not be raised; however, it may be raised later, weather permitting, and remain until close of the business day. 4. Flags will be flown at half -staff when ordered by the President or the Governor of the State as follows: President, 30 days Ex- President or President elect Vice President, the 10 days Chief Justice or retired Chief Justice of the United States or the Speaker of the House of Representatives 0 () 0: L' Resolution No. 2002 - Page 17 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court; a Secretary of an executive or military department; a former Vice President; or Governor of a State, territory or possession. Member of Congress By order of the President Day of death to day of interment Day of death and day following Period to be prescribed By order of the Governor; Day of death to day at the death of any local of interment public safety officer killed in the line of duty. 5. Flags will be flown at half -staff from the day of death to the day of interment for any currently seated Member of the City Council, Member of the City Council Elect or any previously seated Member of the City Council. 6. Flags will be flown at half -staff from the day of death to the day of interment for any currently serving City Manager or City Department Head. 7. Flags will be flown at half -staff from the day of death to the day of interment for any City employee killed in the line of duty. B. When a flag is no longer fit for display, it will be destroyed in a dignified way such as by an American Legion Post at Flag Disposal Ceremonies on Flag Day (June 14) each year. 9. It is the responsibility of the Community Services Department or the service contractor of an offsite municipal building (such as City Engineering/ Building & Safety) to display the National and State Flags at municipal facilities in accordance with the pamphlet " Our Flag" published by the Joint Committee on Printing United States Congress by authority of House Concurrent Resolution 361, 100th Congress (includes Title 36, Chapter 10 of the United States Code). 10. The City Manager or his designee is to determine at what location(s) flags are to be flown 24 hours and for ceremonial purposes. 0CN)!L V0 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 18 SECTION 1 -34. POLICY 144 - CONFLICT OF INTEREST APPRAISAL 1. Conflict of Interest Appraisals shall be allowed to provide proof and rebut the presumption that the financial effect of a governmental decision on real property, in which a public official has an economic interest, is presumed to be material (Section 18705.2 of Title 2, Division 6, California Code of Regulations), as provided below: A. Two conflict of interest appraisals shall be allowed per year per Councilmember if real property in which a Councilmember has an economic interest is the subject of a City Council decision or if any part of that real property is located within 500 feet of the boundaries (or proposed boundaries) of the real property which is the sub-iect of the governmental decision. B. One conflict of interest appraisal shall be allowed per year per Planning Commissioner, if real property in which a Planning Commissioner has an economic interest is the subject of a Commission decision or if any part of that real property is located within 500 feet of the boundaries (or proposed boundaries) of the real property which is the subject of the governmental decision. C. One conflict of interest appraisal shall be allowed per year per for the City Manager, if real property in which the City Manager has an economic interest is the subject of a City government decision or if any part of that real property is located within 500 feet of the boundaries (or proposed boundaries) of the real property which is the sub -sect of the governmental decision. D. One conflict of interest appraisal shall be allowed per year for the D seer of Community Development Director, if real property in which the Community Development Director has an economic interest is the subject of a City government decision or if any part of that real p--roper.ty is located within 500 feet of the boundaries (or proposed boundaries) of the real property which is the sub -ect of the governmental decision. 2. The amount of funding for conflict of interest appraisals shall be a budgetary consideration determined during the budget process as the Council looks at actual projects that are likely to be considered during the following fiscal year. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 19 `rte MN Oil #--e te dead: with se�ida-1 seHi:ial harassffient -;:—�6 establish pr-eeedures tr %- assTCnt a P —.'rte' �=r the week plaee . ey 2. PreeeduEe n _ __ is ; eic i n L e rfi- irg—wiz cad?= v i E' z', a *' : w e r£ —pelf e Eii a xl e e -e i= ee ti -,-a �T � _ Tg ; ire s t i l e—e re f f n s i v e=werk envi renf:Rent . MN Oil 101 2. PreeeduEe n _ __ is ; eic i n L e rfi- irg—wiz cad?= v i E' z', a *' : w e r£ —pelf e Eii a xl e e -e i= ee ti -,-a �T � _ Tg ; ire s t i l e—e re f f n s i v e=werk envi renf:Rent . 0 fQ1�2 Oil 101 0 fQ1�2 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 20 suggestive ef ebseene letteEs, n- t-es, veiee ffiai! F-ff�ail ffiessages, eiF ±nx,�±ta4Aensp 4 , -, ! s assa�ilts 1. , ef a see, Eaalw nat,,air-e, sueh as, :Fape, sexidal ba�eLcy, fftelest-alcien, er- eeffb-,ftit these assaul�s; e Iq intentie-al that is physieal eenduet sexdal in e Iq teuehing, 4- , I - - -6 f pinehingf L= a Lalle i n b h n . q g f i= u s -A g agaq nst anether-'s k3edy, e r- pekifie, bedy. anetzhei=ls - ------------- 1. it is 4�he reseensilAlity ef MafiageiFs, --'" fa their- faedwli: y ei= ees aL=e ±f� eeffiplianee wi:!�h Peliey. All ef-ipleyees are aeeeiintable fer- eemplianee;- 2. Empleyees, whe have eefRplaints ei= whe wi-t-�ness sexea:-11- hai�assfftent Rii:is4� rcepeEt sideh eenduet usineF �c-he eeffipla4 n 4� jaineeeel�ur-e e eei in '19." leelew. i �he re9pensibility ef the Gity's Persenne! Diiceeter q te pEevieie ffeidanee, --nvestigate ehaL=eFes ef and r-eeep.,.-ftend appr-ep e aetien. All eeffiplain# la 7 - 3111 The Gity ManageL� and Gity Atte:r-fiey will- gui-lafiee and assistanee i naling ef af)7y D. Gefl.if)1ain-t- Preeedure 0013. A 3 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 21 a i� a s s ffie 4nt he er she at ier is s beinE ef s e 3 Eu a�- I Any sniekild empleyee whe pelitely believes blat firffily eenficent- the aetien eease harass-!-F!-�� if:,Rffie di ate and def;iand that the behavieL- eE ha�e a T,f- E)r-aetiealf the eeffiplainin�j dise'issien and sheuld deeciment wit-,ese-pr-esent feic the the dise�issien and the hraicassing the pa1=±c-Y date, 1=-he eentent- ef Eeaetlen. j:�aras-sfftent t:e his/her invelves a 3. invelves the Per-sennel Pii-eeter, t- 4. if .:�he eeffip-laint- laint dir-eet-ly-4-.e-t-h-e- eef-tplai�-ant Shal- jnv-elves the S. if the eeFftplaiiit e the eef�iplainant shal� will: ner-ffi 6. -ves:��d:qat--4:en ef the eeffiplaint invelve-, --4— .11 a ties Ail. invellved - -el�-Shall be G-y Attei�ney. faii� investigatien. -1 if t ne investiatien ar4�ial g reveals anel that the eef, is n e d Valid t e s t-ep , nd elisei event: 4�he Ner- li=ia:�assffteni'� lmffie Eid: ate! y-af�e�� The that t en ef whe4�her l, eL eliserifftinater-y effipl-eyffieii-t seeial reiatienship -heut wit a deteL=FRina4�i e n based en all effeet--r--��es an An ±ng±FTg a se)ival fae:r::s in t ^ ef haicassfflent--�jalnt er- assistif"i y fa±- will net- be a4veT-ae-lLy a eefl.ip1maint in 3-n t ter:fts anel eenditiens ef e affee�Eed disehar-ged beeai:ise e f :rz: Ekmsei e iffii ed--at-a-�' lzit - er 0 C' � :Ir-j' Z"A Resolution No. 2002 - Page 22 „ - lee inelia d--i in the ' , f-a izn -will elc el t- 1-, l ., t f } h -' 'liTa's' t o el a f t e.c z- �T�- zr,- rre-- �8-crp e'n'd file f the efRplieyee be w aeeesatien, la-•— lobe- --` ub j e-e m. + e e_i.�- f e rt- -- the eeFftp -t- Vie- J L t✓ 1 U SECTION 15. POLICY 15 - PRE - QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS 1. City Program The City Manager shall cause to be prepared, the City of Moorpark Bidder Pre - Qualification Program [herein "City Program "]. The City Program shall set forth guidelines and procedures related to the pre - qualification of bidder for Projects as defined herein. The City Program shall be consistent with the requirements of a) Sections 1103, 4107 and 20101 [AB574] of the Public Contracts Code and statues amendatory or supplementary thereto, and b) the bidder pre - qualification model documents promulgated by the State Department of Industrial Relations [herein "DIR "] . The City Program shall be maintained and updated as needed, by the City Manager or his /her designee. 2. Applicability All construction projects with an estimated construction cost exceeding one million dollars ($1,000,000) [herein "Project "] shall require the pre - qualification of bidders. To that end, the bidding documents for all Projects shall include provisions for the pre - qualification of bidders in a manner consistent with the procedures and requirements set forth in the City Program. Notwithstanding the above, certain exceptions to these requirements may be authorized as follows: A. The City Manager may waive bidder pre - qualification for any Project, provided a report is forwarded to the City Council at least ten (10) days prior to the Notice Inviting Bids, stating the reasons for, and /or the benefits resulting from, such a waiver; and B. The City Council may waive these requirements for any Project. 3. Project Specific Program vs. Annual Program The DIR "model documents" describe two separate programs: a) one for "project specific" bidder pre - qualification; and b) G, (11 Ji IAZOS Resolution No. 2002 - Page 23 M 5. 1. 2. one for an annual bidder pre - qualification process. The City Program shall set forth a project specific bidder pre - qualifications process. However, should it be determined by the City Manager that it would be in the best interest of the City to administer an annual bidder pre - qualifications process for a number of Projects, the City Program shall be modified for such purpose, provided all such revisions and modifications are consistent with the requirements of the DIR model documents. Evaluation Committee Pre - qualification packages shall be reviewed and scored by an Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee for each Project or annual process shall consist of one (1) to three (3) staff members or consultants retained for such purpose, as determined by the City Manager or his /her designee. Appeals Panel The Appeals Panel shall consist of one or more staff members or consultants retained for such purpose, as determined by the City Manager, provided that no member of the Evaluation Committee shall sit on the Appeals Panel. SECTION 16. POLICY 16 - HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE Purpose To provide guidelines for employees and volunteers to prohibit and prevent unlawful harassment in the workplace and to define procedures for reporting and investigating alleged incidents of unlawful harassment. This policy shall cover sexual h.ar.'assment as well as all other forms of unlawful harassment as described herein. Polic The City is committed to providing a work environment that is free of unlawful harassment. In keeping with this policy, the City strictly prohibits harassment of any kind, including h.arassr,ent on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, mental or physical disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or ar.y other characteristic protected under federal law, state law or local ordinance. The policy prohibits harassment by any City personnel including managers, supervisors, and non - supervisory employees or volunteers. No manager or supervisor GU 0 ii:'G Resolution No. 2002 - Page 24 shall use his /her authority to solicit sexual favors from others. in enforcing this policy, the City strictly prohibits unlawful Harassment of employees or volunteers in any form 'including verbal, physical, and visual harassment. Some examples of these tvpes of harassment are: Verbal harassment which may consist of jokes, epithets, slurs, name calling, negative stereotyping; unwelcome remarks about an individual's body, color, physical characteristics, appearance or talents; questions about a person's sexual practices; and patronizing terms or remarks that relate to a protected characteristic; DIysical. harassment can include phys.i_ca.l_ interference with normal work, impeding or blocking movement, assault, unwelcome physical contact, staring at a person's body, and threatening, intimidating or hostile acts that relate to a protected characteristic as set forth above; Visual harassment may involve offensive or obscene notogra hs, calendars, posters, cards, cartoons, draw-i ngs and gestures; display of sexually suggestive or lewd obiects; unwelcome notes, letters, or e -mail; and any other written or graphic material that denigrates or shows hostility or aversion toward an individual that is placed on walls, bulletin boards, or elsewhere on the Citv's premises or circulated in the workplace. n addition_ to the above forms of unlawful harassment, sexual. harassment may also include, but is riot 1 invited to, making unwelcome sexual advances and requests for sexual favors, and any other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature by fellow employees, volunteers, or suz)erv.i..sor_ s when: A. Submission to such conduct is made an explicit or implicit term or condition of employment; B. Submission to or rejection of such conduct by a individual is used as the basis for employment decisions (promotion, retention, performance appraisal, work assignment, etc.) affecting the individual; or C. Such conduct has a purpose or _ effect of substantially interfering with an individual's work ("I (_. � 11Z 7 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 25 performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. No manager_ or supervisor shall use his /her_ authority to solicit sexual favors from others. It is the impact of the harassment, not the intent that counts. In determining whether conduct was unwelcome, the perspective is that of the person who feels harassed. The behavior is still considered unwelcome when the person consented to the conduct in order to avoid adverse treatment. Any form of retaliation against any person reporting a claim of harassment or otherwise participating or assisting in any investigation of a harassment claim is expressly prohibited and will be considered a violation of this policy. 3. Procedures A. Filing Complaint. If a City employee or volunteer believes he or she has been harassed by another City employee or volunteer in violation of this policy, the affected employee or volunteer should promptly report the facts of the incident and the names of the individuals involved to his or her immediate supervisor. If the immediate supervisor is involved i? the wrong conduct, or if for any reason the employee or volunteer feels uncomfortable about making a claim to that supervisor, the employee or volunteer may report the claim to the Human Resources Assistant /Analyst, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk or directly to the City Manager. If _a City employee or volunteer believes he or she has beer: harassed by a contract City employee, vendor, or appointed or elected official, the affected employee or volunteer should promptly report the facts of the incident and the names of the individuals involved to the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk or directly to the City Manager. If the harassment complaint involves the City Manager, the affected employee or volunteer should promptly report the farts of the incident to the Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, who will then forward the complaint to the Citv Attornev and City Council. Resolution No. 2002 - Page 26 An employee or volunteer who believes he or she has suffered retaliation for reporting any violation of this policy or otherwise participating in any investigation should immediately bring such facts to the attention of the Human Resources Assistant/Analyst, Assistant to City Manaqer/C-L'-IL-.V Clerk or directly to the City Manager. B. invest-igation. Supervisors and managers must immediately report any claims of unlawful harassment to the City Manager's office. The City Manager shall coordinate a prompt, objective, and thorough investigation of any such complaints. At the conclusion of the investigation, the City will make a determination if any individual has violated the prohibit-Lon aqainst unlawful harassment. C. Confidentiality. An investigation related to a complaint under this policy will be conducted with confidentiality and respect for the rights__of all individuals involved. information related to the investigation will be provided on a need-to-know basis only. D. Corrective Action. The City does not tolerate unlawful harassment of any kind. The City Manager shall take -appropriate corrective action whenever such harassment is determined to have occurred. For employees, the corrective action taken shall be remedial and ...... ........... disciplinary in nature and will be commensurate with the severity of the offense. The disciplinary action shall be designed to prevent further unlawful harassment and may -include termination. E. Documentation. All corrective actions taken shall be documented by the Human Resources Division and/or City Attorney. The documentation shall include a summary of the investigation and an explanation of the appropriateness of the corrective actions. F. Notification to Complainant. ................. 1) The complainant will be informed by the Human Resources Division staff that action has been taken. 2) 1 :,The Human Resources Division staff will instruct the complainant to immediately report recurring or ,continuing harassment. ) h f7 (� -.01 � 111. fi�.09 Resolution No. 2002 - Page 27 3) The Human Resources staff shall request the complainant to sign a form acknowledging the followinq: (a) The complainant has been informed that corrective action has been taken; and (b) The complainant has been informed to immediately report the continuation or recurrence of harassment. G. Employee /Volunteer Acknowledgment of Receipt of Harassment in the Workplace Policy. All employees and volunteers shall be re uired to sign a form on the first day of employment or volunteer work acknowledginq the followinq: I acknowledge receipt of the City of Moorpark Harassment in the Workplace Policy. I understand that it: is my responsibility to read and comprehend its contents. If I have any questions, I shall contact my _Supervisor or Decar-tment Head. SECTION 1 -67. This Council Policies resolution shall be updated from time to time as needed but not less often than following each General Municipal Election beginning in 1998. The revised resolution will be presented to the City Council for review and adoption. SECTION 1--8. Resolution No. 2001 -1926 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 1�9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk G, ' ��0 sO/PtEmaurac Resolution No. 2002- H Page 4 calculated from the City as point of departure to the destination. Mileage expense for the use of a personal vehicle for travel shall be at the rate currently allowed by the Internal Revenue Service provided, however, that the total expense of said travel shall not exceed the combined total of the round -trip air fare to the destination, plus the private vehicle mileage expense to and from the airport and appropriate parking fees. Attendance at a special meeting, for which funds are not appropriated, in Sacramento /Washington, D.C. or other City at which attendance by the City of Moorpark is deemed urgent, and which occurs at a time which precludes advance approval by the Council as a whole, may be authorized by the Mayor and one other member of the City Council, subject to the ratification of the expense and appropriation of funds at the next regular Council Meeting. D. Council and Commissioner Expenses The travel and expense reimbursement of members of the Council, the Planning Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be governed by the same rules contained in this policy with the following exception. The certified Claim for Expense Reimbursement form shall be reviewed and subject to the approval of the City Council Budget and Finance Committee. If a member of the Budget and Finance Committee submits a Claim for Expense Reimbursement, it shall be subject to the approval of the two most senior, by tenure, members of the City Council who are not members of the Budget and Finance Committee. E. Mileage Reimbursement for City Appointees to Boards, Commissions, and Committees City Council public appointees to boards, commissions, and committees, that do not receive an honorarium and require travel outside of the Moorpark City limits, shall be eligible to receive mileage reimbursement for attendance at regular and special meetings of that board, commission, or committee. Mileage will be calculated from the appointee's residence in Moorpark as the point of departure to the meeting location. Mileage expense reimbursement for the use of a personal vehicle for travel shall be at the rate currently allowed by the Internal Revenue Service, and as verified by the City Clerk annually. The appointee shall complete the City's Resolution No. 2002 - Page 5 Claim Form for Reimbursement of Travel Expenses, and submit the form to the City Clerk at the end of the month, with the meeting agenda attached as supporting documentation for the mileage reimbursement claim. SECTION 4. POLICY 4 - REPORTS FROM APPOINTEES 1. Reports are required from appointees to the following: Area Agency on Aging Area Housing Authority MeeEpark Mesquites- Abatement —Dist- et- Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee 2. A report shall be required for each scheduled meeting of the agency, authority, district, commission or committee and is due in written form to the City Council five (5) days following the meeting. In lieu of a written report, an oral report may be presented to the Council under the public comment portion of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting after the meeting of the agency, authority, district, etc. 3. Where the City is represented by more than one person, the appointees shall coordinate and collaborate their efforts so only one report is presented to the Council. 4. If neither the appointee nor alternate is in attendance at a meeting of the agency, authority, district, etc., or if the meeting is canceled, that will be reported to the Council by the appointee(s) as prescribed above. SECTION 5. POLICY 5 - ADVERTISING AND APPOINTMENT POLICY FOR CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES 1. At the end of each calendar year, an Appointments IList will be prepared and posted at the City Community Center, -anE Moorpark Library, City Home Page, and local government channel, of all citizen appointive positions and their expiring term of office (in compliance with the Maddy Act requirements) . A contact number and request for communication with the City Clerk will be included, to allow residents to obtain information on- as well as any requirements for the appointed position, and to facilitate communication with the City Clerk in the event a citizen has an interest in being placed on the appointee _resource list. The Appointments IList shall remain posted for the month of January. E a . :r. eziv �" MOORPARK CITY COUNCIJ�641,,,� ' AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council $� FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider City Council Standing and Ad Hoc Committee Appointments and Other City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Committee Assignments BACKGROUND The City Council's Policies Resolution (scheduled to be updated at December 4, 2002 meeting) includes the following language in revised Section 8.2: "With the approval of the majority of the members of the City Council, the Mayor shall make all appointments to Standing Committees of the City Council, including the designated alternate. The appointments shall be made at the first regularly scheduled meeting in January of each odd - numbered year and at the reorganization meeting of the City Council in each even - numbered year." The current appointments and schedule for the Council Standing Committees are as follows: STANDING COMMITTEE TIME DAY Affordable Housing /Community 5:30 Third Wednesday of the Development p.m. Month. Members: Hunter & Harper Alternate: Mikos Budget and Finance 5:30 First Wednesday of the Members: Hunter & Wozniak p.m. Month. Alternate: Harper Public Works, Facilities, & 5:30 Third Monday of the Solid Waste p.m. Month. Members: Hunter & Wozniak Alternate: Millhouse 0061al Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Regular Meeting Page 2 Transportation & Streets 5:30 First Monday of the Members: Mikos & Millhouse p.m. Month. Alternate: Wozniak Economic Development 5:30 Second Monday of the Members: Harper & Millhouse p.m. Month. Alternate: Hunter Attached to this report is the complete list of City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Committee Assignments for the City Council's consideration regarding appointments. Staff recommended revisions (including deletion of committees no longer needed) are shown with the use of legislative format. Staff is recommending that the appointments for the Standing Committees and other City Council and Redevelopment Agency committees and assignments be made at the December 4, 2002, regular meeting. The approval of the regular meeting schedule will be scheduled for the January 15, 2003 agenda (and will be based on the availability of the appointed Councilmembers). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Determine City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency committee appointments and assignments. Attachment: City Council and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Committee Assignments List (including recommended revisions) 000,132 City Council Quarterly Update 4c -t0ber -15,- -- 2- O02Revised Draft November 25, 2002 CITY COUNCIL and MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS STANDING COMMITTEES 1. Budget and Finance Committee Members: Hunter and Wozniak Alternate: Harper Staff Assignment: Director of Administrative Services Meeting Date: lst Wednesday of month at 5:30 p.m. A. CDBG B. Mobilehome Park Rent Hardship Review Panel C. Legislation Review 2. Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Members: Mikos and Wozniak Alternate: Millhouse Staff Assignment: Director of Public Works Meeting Date: 3rd Monday of month at 5:30 p.m. A. Water Issues B. East County Wasteshed Task Force Wozniak: City's Representative Mikos: Alternate C. Master Plan Community Center Site 3. Affordable Housinq /Community Development Committee Members: Hunter and Harper Alternate: Mikos Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development Meeting Date: 3rd Wednesday of month at 5:30 p.m. A.... ..... ................. ..G re e.nbe l..t...._...Re v ..e.w. BA_. Affordable Housing including Inclusionary Zoning CB. First Time Home Buyer Program D... Downtown Resdentia.l.Parking -and Neighborhood Appe.ara.. nee....... ...I...ssues..... - ....(..Second _- -St- re.e.t........A.re.a..} E.C. Requests to Amend the General Plan 4. Transportation and Streets Committee Members: Mikos and Millhouse Alternate: Wozniak Staff Assignment: Director of Public Works Meeting Date: 1st Monday of month at 5:30 p.m. A. Transportation Policy Planning Committee (TPPC) Member: Mikos Alternate: Millhouse Council Committee Assignments Page 2 B. Truck Scales C..... .. . . ...... AOC Re i.. mbu. r.. s.. e.m.e.n.t......- .p.o..l.- i..c.y DC. City Paratransit Review Committee ED. VISTA Board Member: Mikos Alternate: Millhouse FE. Review of Street Light Standards 5. Economic Development Committee Members: Harper and Millhouse Alternate: Hunter Staff Assignment: Assistant City Manager Meeting Date: 2nd Monday of month at 5:30 p.m. A. Consider a Truck Stop in or around Moorpark * B. Redevelopment Agency's Downtown Business Loan Program C. Regional Defense Partnership Member: Millhouse Alternate: Harper AD HOC COMMITTEES 1. Day Laborer Committee to Meet with Adjacent Businesses and Property Owners Members: Harper & Hunter Staff Assignment: Assistant City Manager 2. Casey Road Site...;....... - Flory -- Avenue Site, and City Participation in Advance Planning of School Facilities Members: Hunter & Harper Staff Assignment: City Manager 3. City /MUSD Facilities and Programs Members: Harper & Millhouse Staff Assignment: City Manager 4. Public Customer Service Program Members: Hunter & Wozniak Staff Assignment: City Manager 5. SunCal Properties Members: Harper & Mikos Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development 6. Cable Communications Franchises Members: Harper & Millhouse Staff Assignment: Assistant City Manager 7. .; .............. ... ... Jo i..n.t...- ....U.se....... -Li.. br.a..ry.......Commi- .t- t..e.e. .......... ... ........ ..._........ Metube .- rs...,._- ...._.H.un.t..e. -r - .&.... - Harper *Moorpark Redevelopment Agency GC" AJ Council Committee Assignments Page 3 .................... . ........... .....S..t..a.. €-f-. Ass 1-gn -m e.n..t....,...- -....D -rector........o_f ....... Community- .......S.e.rv.i..e..e..s 87. Moorpark Library Advisory Committee Members: Hunter & Mikos Staff Assignment: Director of Community Services 98. Greenbelt Ad Hoc Committee Members: Hunter & Mikos Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development 1..F1 ....... ..... ......... Publ- i. .c_..._..Art..........Advisory Cemm- i.t..t..ee. ......... .............................Me er. s.,.._. ........ Harper ....-.. &.._..M...l-l..h.o. use...._....... Par. k. s........ a. nd ........Recreation Commissioner. ......Sandra— ... .Thompson........ . ... .ate _ Moor .e.........a.nd........M.a.ry g.c.hw.a b a.0 e. r ....... ............................... S..t..a.. f. f_...... A. s. s. .i.g.nme.n..t ....:...........Di re.c..t.or........o..f........0 em mun..i...t_y........Services 119. Catholic Charities Relocation Members: Millhouse & Wozniak Staff Assignment: Assistant City Manager 120. OSCAR Element Members: Harper & Mikos Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development 131. Cardservice International Development Agreement Members: Hunter & Millhouse Staff Assignment: City Manager 142. Development of Goals Pertaining to Reducing or Eliminating Truck Traffic on SR -118 through Moorpark Members: Hunter & Millhouse Staff Assignment: Assistant City Manager 153. Pool Ad Hoc Committee for Community Aquatic Facility Members: Harper & Millhouse Staff Assignment: Director of Community Services 164. Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -10 on the Application of Asadurian Investments (Assessor Parcel No. 511 -0- 070 -55) Members: Millhouse & Wozniak Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development 1.75. Toll Brothers (Moorpark Country Club Estates) Amendment to Settlement Agreement Members: Hunter & Millhouse Staff Assignment: Director of Community Development 146. City /MUSD D.A.R.E. Program Members: Hunter & Harper Staff Assignment: City Manager *Moorpark Redevelopment Agency o ky a!; Council Committee Assignments Page 4 OTHER ASSIGNMENTS Moorpark City Council Appointments 1. Association of Ventura County Cities (AVCC) Representative: Mayor Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem; and any remaining Councilmember may be an alternate 2. Disaster Council Chairman: Mayor 3. Channel Counties Division -- League of California Cities Representative: Mayor Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem; and any remaining Councilmember may be an alternate 4. Ventura County Council of Governments (COG) Representative: Mayor Alternate: Any remaining Councilmember may be an alternate 5. CJPIA Voting Delegate: Mayor Alternate: ATOM /City Clerk or Sr. Management Analyst 6. Ventura County Animal Regulation Commission Member: Hunter Alternate: Wozniak 7. Member of the Economic Development Collaborative of Ventura County (EDCVC) Member: Millhouse First Alternate: Harper Second Alternate: Hunter *Moorpark Redevelopment Agency G001JG Council Committee Assignments Page 5 8. Ventura County Library Service Commission Representative: Wozniak Alternate: Hunter; and any remaining Councilmember may be an alternate 9. Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Member: Mikos Alternate: Millhouse 10. Ventura Cities Mortgage Financing Authority Representative: Harper Alternate: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst, and Darya Bhigley;-- Administrative Services Director 11. Youth Sports Liaison Representative: Millhouse 12. City Veteran's Liaison to the Ventura Veteran's Home Project Committee Representative: Wozniak 13. Public Art Advisory_ Committee Members: Harper & Millhouse, Parks and Recreation Commissioner Sandra _Thompson_,.. Public Members Jay Moore and Mary Schwabauer Staff Assignment: Director of Community Services Other Agency Appointments 1. Ventura County Transportation Commission Appointed by City Selection Committee Regular Member: Wozniak (expires January 2005) 2. Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency Board of Directors Appointed by City Selection Committee City Member: Mikos Term: Expires February 2003 CC: The Honorable City Council Steven Kueny, City Manager ACM and Department Heads City Staff via E -mail & City Share /City Share /City Mgr. Folder File 190.5 (Quarterly Updates Only) M: \deb \COM ASN Oct 2002 FINAL 1.2 2002 Agenda Rpt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . *Moorpark Redevelopment Agency 0 Q0137 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 9-3-- ACk Arld TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 26, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Appointment of a City Council Ad Hoc Committee for the North Park Village Project Development Agreement BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Since the approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with North Park Village L.P. in December 2001 for processing of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and related entitlements, staff has been working with the applicant and the environmental impact report (EIR) consultant (BonTerra Consulting) to complete the draft EIR, draft specific plan, and various studies and reports needed to bring the project to hearing. Staff is requesting that an Ad Hoc Committee be appointed at this time to negotiate a proposed development agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Appoint a North Park Village Project Ad Hoc Committee. C`�AO:LjS T'+ .�Ii�='1/�u�ce�✓�� MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California August 21, 2002 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on August 21, 2002, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Approval of Final Parcel Map 5316 Located on Park Crest Lane at Park Lane (USA Properties Fund, Inc.) . Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve Final Parcel Map 5316; 2) accept the offer of dedication of right - of -way for street and highway purposes shown on the map; 3) authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Final Parcel Map; and 4) direct the City Clerk to record Final Parcel Map 5316. Mr. Brown gave the staff report. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to: 1) Approve Final Parcel Map 5316; 2) accept the offer of dedication of right -of -way for street and highway purposes shown on the map; 3) authorize U?01439 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 2 Auaust 21, 2002 the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Final Parcel Map; and 4) direct the City Clerk to record Final Parcel Map 5316. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 5. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny announced that one case under Item 5.B. and Items S.F. and 5.G. would be discussed in closed session. MOTION: Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adjourn to of one case under Item 5.B. and carried by unanimous voice vote. moved and Councilmember Mikos closed session for a discussion Items 5.F. and 5.G. The motion The time was 6:07 p.m. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 10) F. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 504 -0- 021 -195, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Joe Fedele Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment G. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 506 -0- 042 -015, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Bert and Placide Curts Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Present in closed session were all Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Director; Barry Hogan, Community Walter Brown, City Engineer; and Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. Councilmembers; Steven City Attorney; Hugh Gilbert, Public Works Development Director; Deborah Traffenstedt, The Council reconvened into open session at 6:38 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that only one case under Item 5.B. was discussed in closed session and that there was no action to report. . .•I Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 3 Auqust 21, 2002 6. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 6:38 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California October 2, 2002 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on October 2, 2002, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. 2. INVOCATION: Mayor Hunter requested a silent moment of reflection. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Millhouse led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert LeMay, Sheriff's Department; Johnny Ea, Budget and Finance Manager; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. S. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation Recognizing Mental Illness Awareness Week, October 6 - 12, 2002. Mayor Hunter read the proclamation. Sonna Gray, representing the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, was present to accept the proclamation. Ms. Gray thanked the City for the proclamation. B. Proclamation Recognizing Ventura County Arts Week and Arts Day in California, October 4, 2002. C 001"12 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 October 2, 2002 Mayor Hunter read the proclamation and presented it to Margarita Riley. Ms. Riley thanked the City for the proclamation. C. Recognize New City Employee, Johnny Ea, Budget and Finance Manager. Mayor Hunter provided a summary of Mr. Ea's experience and welcomed him as a new employee to the City of Moorpark. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: Moustafa Elgamiel, Moorpark resident, requested that the Council reconsider his claim for damages from a soccer ball that hit his vehicle as he was traveling on Collins Drive adjacent to the City's park. He explained that the fencing around the park does not adequately protect the public from future incidents. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter noted that the regular Redevelopment Agency meeting had been cancelled. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Councilmember Mikos requested that Item ll.F be pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Mikos reported that Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy's (SMMC) portion of Proposition 40 funding was being distributed over several years, so that the year one distribution amount was well below what was anticipated. She further reported that SMMC is recommending that other jurisdictions consider working together with SMMC to perhaps pool their resources to develop the best way to utilize these limited funds. Councilmember Mikos requested that City staff contact SMMC staff and provide input on how the Proposition 40 funds could benefit the City of Moorpark with regard to acquisition of open space and related programs. Councilmember Mikos announced a Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park hike on October 13, from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. She also announced a Jazz beneath the Trees fundraising event Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 October 2, 2002 sponsored by the Commission on Human Concerns on October 5, from 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Mayor Hunter announced the upcoming City Halloween party and Trick or Treat Village at Arroyo Vista Recreation on October 26, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consideration Amending Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 Annual Action Plan of Ventura County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fiscal Year 2000 -2005 Consolidated Plan to Include Theater on High Project; Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 2002- to Apply for Section 108 Loan for Theater on High Project for $500,000 from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Furnishings, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF &E) for the Theater at 45 East High Street and for the Acquisition of 11 -17 East High Street; and Consider Approving Agreement Between City of Moorpark and Janss IV Recreation for Theater on High Project. (Continued with public hearing open from September 18, 2002 meeting.) Staff recommendation: Continue the public hearing to October 16, 2002. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter stated that the public hearing was still open. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to continue this item, with the public hearing open, to October 16, 2002. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider an Ordinance Amending Moorpark Municipal Code Title 15 - Building and Construction, by Amending Chapters 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.14, 15.16, 15.18, and 15.20; Adopting By Reference and Amending the Current Editions of Certain Model Codes. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 289 for first reading, amending Title 15 of the Moorpark Municipal Code by amending Chapters 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.14, 15.16, 15.18, and 15.20, and adopting by reference and amending the current editions of certain model codes. CC 0-1 -1 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 4 October 2, 2002 Ms. Stringer gave the staff report. She noted that the City Engineer has recommended that Section 3704.1 SURFACE WATER be amended to read, "Surface water from pool decks shall be collected and conducted through non - erosive devices to an area suitable and in conformance with the National Pollution Elimination Systems Regulations (NPDES)." In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Brown explained that a dry well is a well that is filled with an aggregate, such as broken rock, and used as a seepage pit. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance No. 289. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 289. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to introduce Ordinance No. 289 for first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Proposed Sign Program for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace - 357,621 Square Foot Commercial Center) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. (Continued from September 18, 2002 meeting.) Staff recommendation: Approve the Master Sign Program subject to the staff recommended modifications. Mr. Porter gave the staff report. He presented a video depicting the proposed sign at heights of seventy -eight (78) feet and thirty -eight (38) feet. He summarized staff's recommended revisions to the Master Sign Program. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Porter discussed the height and width of the freeway- oriented 01"115 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pacfe 5 October 2, 2002 pylon sign and referred a question regarding the size of the Target sign to the applicant to answer. Thomas Vachet, a Moorpark resident, said he moved to Moorpark for its rural quality and environmental excellence, and expressed his concern about the size of the pylon sign being the tallest commercial sign in Ventura County. Craig M. Parker, a Moorpark resident, spoke in opposition to the 78 -foot high sign, and urged the Council to preserve the quality of life in Moorpark. Lise Houston, a Moorpark resident, said that the sign was not necessary and that its presence would degrade the value of Moorpark. She stated there is currently a beautiful view of the hills. She noted that no other retail establishment required such a sign along State Route 23 or Highway 118 in Ventura County. Pierce Verleur, a Moorpark resident, said that he would like to have a nice center but did not want to emulate the San Fernando Valley. He asked the Council to preserve the aesthetics of the City. Randy Potts, representing Superior Signs in Long Beach, and Brian Wolfe, representing P & R Architects, 111 W. Ocean Blvd., 21St Floor, Long Beach, responded to Councilmember Millhouse's questions regarding the appearance and dimensions of the freeway- oriented pylon sign. Robert Exel, representing Zelman Retail Partners, 515 South Figueroa, Suite 1230, Los Angeles, discussed alternatives that were looked at and stated that Target will not sign a purchase agreement until the freeway- oriented pylon sign is approved. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Wolfe described the signage proposed in conjunction with the food court and fountain. Councilmember Millhouse stated that as proposed, a fountain with advertising does not constitute art. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that the scaffolding near the fountain was not part of G c of. U; Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 6 October 2, 2002 the art project, and that the signage was shown on the arches. Councilmember Mikos recommended that the font type for the signage have more attractive lettering. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Porter confirmed that the development would comply with the Lighting Ordinance for the Carlsberg Specific Plan, as amended. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that Caltrans requires fencing adjacent to State Route 23, but that they would build decorative fencing next to the pylon sign. Mr. Brown explained that Caltrans looks at what the local jurisdiction wants regarding fencing. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Exel stated that only the Kohl's store was guaranteed at this time. He stated that if Target backs out, other tenants would not sign their leases. He stated that a less elaborate sign could be built, but that it wouldn't be as attractive. He agreed with Mr. Wolfe that he believed Caltrans would approve a fence change. Councilmember Wozniak expressed concern relative to the size of the sign and the apparent insistence by the prospective tenants for the sign. In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Exel stated that Target has consistently stated since day one that they had to have this sign. Mr. Wolfe explained that the site was unusual because of the low elevation relative to the freeway, which minimized visibility. Mr. Exel discussed problems with alternative sign locations. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Wolfe described how a wider and shorter pylon sign would look. Councilmember Mikos expressed concern that the wider and shorter design would look like a billboard. Mayor Hunter reiterated Councilmember Wozniak's concerns, and said he must consider the interests of GUS )147 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 October 2, 2002 Moorpark not the prospective tenants. He noted that there were no depictions of the sign at street level, from nearby residential neighborhoods, or at nighttime. Mayor Hunter stated that he could not support this level of signage and strongly encouraged the Council to refer the item back to the Council Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Excel stated that he believed the Council approved the freeway- oriented pylon sign height and location in conjunction with the third amendment to the settlement agreement. Councilmember Millhouse advised that the Council should discuss this particular issue with the City Attorney before further deliberation. Mr. Kueny agreed that the matter should be discussed with the City Attorney and suggested that the item be continued for two weeks. Councilmember Harper expressed concern that without a consensus on the height, the Ad Hoc Committee could not make a different recommendation. In response to the Council's concerns, Mr. Kueny suggested tabling the item and recommended a telephone conversation with the City Attorney in closed session due to a threat of litigation. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council agreed to table the item to determine if a conference call could be arranged with the City Attorney. B. Consider a Resolution Ratifying the Implementation of Appendix VII of Ventura County Fire Protection District Ordinance 24 within Jurisdictional Boundaries of the City of Moor Approve Resolution No. County Fire Protection Appendix VII pertaining application within the the City of Moorpark. )ark. Staff Recommendation: 2002 -2010 ratifying Ventura District Ordinance No. 24, to building standards for jurisdictional boundaries of Ms. Stringer gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Harper, Diane Morgan, County Fire Marshall, stated that the ordinance has G 0 014s Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 October 2, 2002 not been changed in regard to allowing homeowners to add 500 of the existing square footage to their homes without installing sprinklers. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Morgan confirmed that new construction of 5,000 square feet or more would require sprinklers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 2002- 2010, ratifying Ventura County Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 24, Appendix VII pertaining to building standards for application within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Moorpark. The motion passed by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter announced that Item 10.C. would be deferred until after the Consent Calendar. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 11.F., which was pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 20, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 5, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register as processed. for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - October 2, 2002. Manual Warrants 110550 - 110550 & $ 1,204.31 110641 - 110642 $ 69,472.60 Payroll Liability 110643 - 110650 $ 13,052.37 Warrants Regular Warrants 110651 - 110744 $ 22,337.55 110745 - 110767 $211,580.01 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. '�)f19 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 9 October 2, 2002 C. Consider Authorizing the Sale of 6479 Penn Avenue #B. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve Resolution No. 2002- 2011, authorizing the sale of 6479 Penn Avenue, Unit #B, Moorpark, for fair market value, and no less than $218,745, plus estimated costs of sale; 2) Direct the City Manager to approve reconveyance of the City's interest in this property; and 3) Direct staff to publish notice of a public hearing to be held November 6, 2002, to consider reallocating funds realized from the sale of this property. D. Consider Approval of Disposal of Surplus Computer and Related Equipment. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2012 declaring computer equipment surplus. E. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Amending the FY 2002/03 Budget to Cover Final Project Costs and Authorize Recordation of the Notice of Completion for the Construction of the AVCP Phase II Restroom /Storage /Concession Facility Project. Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2013 amending the FY 2002/03 budget by appropriating an additional $30,000 from the Park Improvement Fund - Community Zone; 2) Accept the work as complete; 3) Authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the project; and 4) Authorize the release of the balance of payment, due upon satisfactory clearance and 35 days after Notice of Completion records and completion of close -out contractual obligations on the part of the contractor. G. Consider Art in Public Places Project for CUP No. 94 -1 (Moorpark Country Club Estates) . Staff Recommendation: Approve the Toll Brothers' Art in Public Places project as submitted. H. Consider Rejection of Claim: Moustafa Elgamiel. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. I. Consider Adoption of Resolution Revising Administrative Fees for Towing of Vehicles and Rescinding Resolution No. 97 -1298. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2014. J. Consider a Request for the Reduction of Sureties for Tract Improvements and Refund of a Cash Bond for Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 10 October 2, 2002 Street Repairs Associated with Tract 5201 (Wilshire Builders, Inc.). Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize the City Clerk to reduce surety #SD00076748, SD00076749, SD00076750, and SD00076751 as outlined in the agenda report; 2) Authorize the City Clerk to refund the cash surety for street repairs in the amount of $25,703.37 to Wilshire Builders; and 3) Authorize the City Clerk to fully exonerate all surety bonds held by the City for Tract 5201 one year after this approval of the reduction of surety bonds and upon written confirmation from the City Engineer that no warranty work is required. K. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the Planning Commission to Hold a Public Hearing and Provide a Recommendation on a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on 0.33 Acres Located at the Northwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2015, directing the Planning Commission to study a potential General Plan Amendment and Zone Change at the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street and provide a recommendation to the City Council. L. Consider Solid Waste Franchise Extension. Staff Recommendation: Approve an extension of the City's Franchise Agreements with Moorpark Rubbish Disposal and GI Industries through October 31, 2002, and authorize the City Manager to execute the extension. M. Consider Resolution Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure for Council Meetings and Related Functions and Activities and Rescinding Resolution No. 99 -1613. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2016. The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration: F. Consider Resolution Authorizing the City's FY 2002/03 Transportation Development Act Claim. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2017 authorizing the FY 2002/2003 TDA claim for the City of Moorpark and authorizing the City Manager to sign the claim for submittal to VCTC. Councilmember Mikos explained that she wanted the public to know that the funds were used for various Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 11 October 2, 2002 items and programs such as the senior citizen dial -a- ride, new bus stop signs, new bus shelters, summer beach bus, two fixed route systems, new buses, Metrolink maintenance, and the Country Days bus. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2017 authorizing the FY 2002/2003 TDA claim for the City of Moorpark and authorizing the City Manager to sign the claim for submittal to VCTC. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter requested a motion for closed session to discuss under Item 13.A. the threat of litigation pertaining to Item 10.A. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session to confer with legal counsel under Item 13.A., one case, pertaining to Item 10.A. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 8:42 p.m. Mr. Kueny announced that the facts and circumstances creating significant exposure to litigation, which facts and circumstances are known to potential plaintiffs, consist of a verbal threat of litigation from Robert Exel pertaining to the Third Amendment to the Settlement Agreement between the City of Moorpark and Conejo Freeway Partners. A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney (via telephone conference call); Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk. The Council reconvened into open session at 9:25 p.m. Mayor Hunter stated that Item 10.A. was discussed in closed session under Item 13.A. Mr. Kueny stated that there was no action to report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 12 October 2, 2002 AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter announced that the Council would continue its discussion of Item 10.A and the remaining agenda items. 10. PRESENTATIONS /ACTIONS /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Proposed Sign Program for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace - 357,621 Square Foot Commercial Center) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. (Continued from September 18, 2002 meeting.) Staff recommendation: Approve the Master Sign Program subject to the staff recommended modifications. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that he had sketched an alternative sign that was approximately 55 feet in total height and 42 feet in width. He agreed to incorporate the arch features into the sign's design. Mr. Wolfe confirmed that he could create renditions of the sign in time for a special City Council meeting next week. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to continue Item 10.A. to Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Cancellation of Special Meeting Scheduled for October 9, 2002 and Rescheduling of Agenda Items. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report and suggested a special meeting be held on October 30, 2002, that would not be televised. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to cancel the special meeting scheduled for October 9, and reschedule the special meeting to October 30, at 6:30 p.m., for a workshop session to review concept design recommendations for the Police Services Center and for discussion of a State Route 23 study. C' Q, �):L::r 43 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 13 October 2, 2002 12. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance No. 286, an Ordinance of the City of Moorpark, California, Amending Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Related to Lighting Regulations. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 286 read for the second time and adopted as read. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance No. 286. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 286. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 286 read for a second time and adopted as read. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Ordinance No. 287, an Ordinance of the City of Moorpark, California, Approving Zone Change No. 2002 -03 to Align Zone Boundaries with Lot Lines in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4928 and to Allow for a Lot Line Adjustment for the Development of a Water Tank Site for the Moorpark Country Club Estates. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 287 read for the second time and adopted as read. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance No. 287. MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 287. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 287 read for a second time and adopted as read. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Ordinance No. of Moorpark, California Chapter 12.16, Parks, c and Public Places, of Staff Recommendation: for the second time and 288, an Ordinance of the Cit Amending Section 12.16.050 of Title 12, Streets, Sidewalks, the Moorpark Municipal Code. Declare Ordinance No. 288 read adopted as read. GUI 0 1.54 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 14 October 2, 2002 Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance No. 288. MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 288. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 288 read for a second time and adopted as read. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 13. CLOSED SESSION: No additional closed session was held. 14. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting to Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 9:33 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk Gt,J1. 5 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California October 17, 2002 An Adjourned Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on October 17, 2002, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:45 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Boy Scout Troop 649 led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert LeMay, Sheriff's Department; John Hartnett, Recreation Superintendent; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst; Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation Recognizing Red Ribbon Week, October 19 - 27, 2002. Mayor Hunter read the proclamation and presented it to Captain Robert LeMay. Captain LeMay announced that red ribbons would be available to the public at the Moorpark Police Department and other various locations within the city. B. Proclamation Recognizing the month of October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Mayor Hunter read the proclamations. Cathy Brudnicki, representing Interface Children Family Services and Bonnie Warrington, representing 0. 3 5 G Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 October 17, 2002 Soroptimist International, Camino Real Region, were present to accept the proclamations. Ms. Warrington presented the Mayor with handouts for city staff to give to the public, which provide the National Domestic Violence Hotline and Teen Assist phone numbers. C. City Manager's Monthly Report. Mr. Kueny introduced Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager, who gave the monthly report. Mr. Riley provided an update of the Administrative Services Department's progress with regard to several projects including interfacing assets inventory reports into the permanent active Financial Management System; the audit of the City's transit programs; the City's annual audit; the submission of Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 annual street report to the State Controller; testing of new financial software for tracking developer deposit accounts known as the Deposit /Expense Time Tracking System (DETTS); participation in countywide sharing of data to develop a Geographic Information System (GIS); finalization of a contract with a consultant who will upgrade the design of the City's website; conversion of the City's computer operating system from Microsoft Windows NT to Microsoft 2000; and the availability of the archived video version of City Council meetings on the City's website at www.ci.moorpark.ca.us. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: Dale Parvin, President -elect and Fund Raising Chair, representing the Moorpark Rotary Club, announced the upcoming Civil War battle enactment to be held at the Tierra Rej ada Ranch, 3340 Moorpark Road, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday, November 2, and Sunday, November 3, 2002. Amado Reynoso, a Moorpark resident, expressed concerns regarding safety issues associated with the Colmer Development, including the increased number of cars emptying onto Flory Avenue; parking provided on only one side of the street; and children playing in the increasingly busy street. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 October 17, 2002 In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny deferred to Mr. Hogan to advise the Council on the status of the Colmer project, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307. Mr. Hogan stated that a modification to add three affordable units to the previously approved Colmer subdivision recently went before the Planning Commission; the Redevelopment Agency is working with the developer to add the affordable units to what is currently Agency -owned property; and the Planning Commission considered and recommended approval of a Minor Modification to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, a General Plan Amendment, and a Zone Change, all of which will come before the Council in the near future. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Hogan stated that the original homes in the Colmer subdivision would not be adversely affected by the proposed changes. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to convene a meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7:02 p.m. The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:07 p.m. 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) Councilmember Millhouse requested that Item 9.A. be considered prior to Public Hearings. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to reorder Item 9.A. to be considered immediately prior to the consideration of the Public Hearings. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Mayor Hunter announced the upcoming City Halloween Party and Trick or Treat Village at Arroyo Vista Recreation Center on October 26, 2002, from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Presentation by Glen Becerra, Regional Manager, Southern California Edison. Rudy Gonzales, Regional Manager for Southern California Edison, began the presentation. He discussed the consequences experienced by his company and consumers due to the deregulation of utility companies and provided an overview of Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 October 17, 2002 the future of his company since the energy supply shortages of the recent past. He introduced Glen Becerra as the new Regional Manager for the City of Moorpark. Mr. Becerra also introduced himself as a Councilmember from the City of Simi Valley. He stated that he looks forward to working with the City of Moorpark in both capacities. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Amending Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 Annual Action Plan of Ventura County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fiscal Year 2000 -2005 Consolidated Plan to Include Theater on High Project; Consider Adoption of Resolution No 2002- to Apply for Section 108 Loan for Theater on High Project for $500,000 from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Furnishings, Fixtures and Equipment (FF &E) for the Theater at 45 East High Street and for the Acquisition of 11 -17 East High Street; and Consider Approving Agreement Between City of Moorpark and Janss IV Recreation for Theater on High Project. (Continued with public hearing open from October 2, 2002 meeting.) Staff Recommendation: 1) Close public hearing; and 2) Decline request for Section 108 loan application, agreement with Janss IV Recreation, and amending Annual Action Plan. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter stated that the public hearing remains open. There were no public speakers for this item, and Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to: 1) Close the public hearing; and 2) decline the request for Section 108 loan application, agreement with Janss IV Recreation, and amend the Annual Action Plan. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 10, a Request to Construct an Approximately 113,994 Square Foot Mini - Warehouse /Office Building on a 112,184 Square Foot Parcel Located at 875 Los Angeles Avenue, at the Northwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue, on the Application of Asadurian Investments. (Continued from August 21, 2002 meeting.) Staff Recommendation: Continue the public hearing to November 6, 2002, with the public hearing open. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 October 17, 2002 Barry Hogan stated that the applicant indicates additional time is needed beyond November 6, 2002, to allow time to work with the Ad Hoc Committee and staff. He stated that staff recommends continuing the public hearing open to December 18, 2002. Councilmember Millhouse asked if Councilmember Wozniak is comfortable continuing to work on that Ad Hoc Committee in light of his pending retirement. Mr. Kueny stated that he does not see a need for reorganization of the membership since he anticipates the Ad Hoc Committee will have concluded their work on this item early in December in order to be heard by December 18, 2002. Mayor Hunter stated that the public hearing remains open. There were no public speakers for this item, and Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to continue the public hearing open to December 18, 2002, to allow the Ad Hoc Committee and staff to work with the applicant. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Minor Modification No. 3 to Commercial Planned Development No. 92 -01 to Modify the Conditions of Approval Pertaining to Permit Expiration and to Review Existing Conditions of Approval for Compliance with Current City Standards for the Gasoline Station /Mini -mart at the Southwest Corner of Moorpark and Los Angeles Avenues. Applicant: Moorpark Oil Company. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2018 approving Minor Modification No. 3 to Commercial Planned Development No. 92 -01, amending Conditions of Approval. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Montes stated that the City's opinion is that the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) permit can expire due to discontinuance of use; the applicant is arguing that the use did not cease due to receivership; and that he recommends any further discussion of the legal issues be held in closed session. In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Hogan stated that staff has requested the Alcohol Beverage Commission U.U01 G() Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 October 17, 2002 (ABC) license transfer be held and that sign permits not be approved until resolution of this issue. In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Kueny confirmed that whether or not the applicant bonds for the conditions, staff's opinion is that the improvements must be completed before alcohol sales are permitted. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Hogan stated that the question of abandonment is no longer an issue, since the applicant has indicated the project conditions are acceptable. Councilmember Mikos stated that there appears to be a reasonable compromise, if the applicant acquiesces and an efficient conclusion is reached. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Sam Atassi, President of Moorpark Oil Company, Inc., 50 W. Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark, California, stated that he is in agreement with the recommended conditions and is available for questions. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Atassi stated that he is planning to start complying with the conditions right away; and that once he receives all of the permits, he expects to be completed within a few weeks. He also stated his ABC license is ready to be issued upon the City's concurrence. In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Atassi confirmed that he is in agreement with the withholding of the ABC license, since he will be in compliance with the conditions very soon. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Atassi explained that the conditional approval from the ABC allows him to sell beer and wine; however, at the request of the City, he is not selling alcohol. Tom Cohen, Esq., attorney for the applicant, Moorpark Oil Co., Inc., Westlake Village, California, stated he is available for questions. Councilmember Millhouse stated that this is an easy fix and he will support staff's recommendation. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 October 17, 2002 In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan stated that staff has requested that ABC hold the transfer of the license and that Mr. Atassi has been cooperative. Councilmember Mikos stated that she is glad the upgrades to the landscaping and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NYPDES) requirements will be taking place. She went on to state her support of staff's recommendation. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Hogan stated that Exhibit A., Item 4., allows staff flexibility to bring the site into compliance with the landscape plans by substituting some plant materials. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2018 approving Minor Modification No. 3 to Commercial Planned Development No. 92 -01, amending the Conditions of Approval. The motion passed by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Proposed Sign Program for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace - 357,621 Square Foot Commercial Center) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. (Continued from October 8, 2002 adjourned meeting.) Staff Recommendation: Approve the Master Sign Program subject to the staff recommended modifications. Mr. Porter gave the staff report, including a PowerPoint presentation of the modifications made to the signs. He stated that staff recommends Option B with the clock tower for the freeway pylon sign; a 20 -foot pylon sign with a roof style; the remainder of the suggested modifications listed in the August 26, 2002, staff report, except for the elimination of Item 6; and Councilmember Mikos' recommendations from the previous Council meeting. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Porter deferred to the applicant on how the clock face is to be lighted. Mayor Hunter stated that the public hearing remains open. Brian Wolfe, architect for P & R Architects, 111 West Ocean Boulevard, #2100, Long Beach, California, added to C'00s 6`2 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 October 17, 2002 staff's description of the signage changes including a reduction in the height of the 24 -foot New Los Angeles Avenue sign to 20 feet, along with a reduction in width from 10 feet to 9 feet; architectural changes to the top of the sign to replace the solid panel including revisions to the cap to include full dimensional columns, a space for Target's logo, and termination in a flat cornice; and low- intensity surface illumination in compliance with the Lighting Ordinance to accent the clock face. He stated that a gable roof could be added to the 20 -foot pylon sign, but that he recommends not adding that feature. He said that they agree with the staff recommendations. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that adding music to the clock tower might be offensive to some people. Councilmember Harper stated that although he prefers a wider, lower sign, he likes Option B, which is very attractive. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Wolfe indicated that the column features can be carried over to the east /west elevations. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Wolfe stated that the columns can be tapered, as seen in the previous version. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that a tapered design was preferable for the columns. Robert Exel, representing Zelman Retail Partners, 515 South Figueroa, Suite 1230, Los Angeles, California, stated he was available for questions. Eloise Brown, a previous Moorpark resident who currently resides in Arizona, stated her opposition to the six - story high Target sign as it will become a defining statement for the City of Moorpark. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. Councilmember Harper stated that he prefers Option B for the freeway pylon sign with the modifications discussed, including the more ornate cap and base, tapered columns on all elevations, and the clock face on the east and west sides. () %)1IG43 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 October 17, 2002 Mayor Hunter asked if there was a consensus on the freeway pylon sign. The majority of the Council was in favor of Option B with the more ornate cap and base elements, tapered columns on all elevations, and containing a clock face on the east and west sides. Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Millhouse were opposed. Councilmember Harper stated that the 20 -foot high sign at the 9 -foot width is fine without the roof element. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that the more slender 9 -foot wide version of the 20 -foot high sign without a roof element was acceptable. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Wolfe stated that the national chain stores would have their trade mark logo and fonts on the 12 -foot sign, while other smaller tenants would be limited to one of three colors using dimensional letters with different fonts. Councilmember Harper stated that the 12 -foot sign is attractive looking and he concurs with the applicant that there be should be no decorative roof feature. He went on to state that the line drawing of the colonnade at the food court shows the tenant logos have been moved away from the water feature, which should make it more acceptable to Councilmember Millhouse. CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Council, it was determined that the 12 -foot high sign need not have a roof feature and that the logos shown on the colonnade near the proposed fountain should be moved away from the water feature. Mayor Hunter asked if there was a consensus to accept staff's recommendation to delete Modification No. 6. CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Council, it was determined to accept staff's recommendation to delete Modification No. 6. Councilmember Millhouse stated his opposition to the project and proposed sign program. He stated he could not support a 66 -foot high pylon sign. Mayor Hunter stated his opposition to the sign program, indicating that a 66 -foot high sign is inappropriate for the community and in this location; the Council is making this decision under threat of litigation; and other shopping centers have been successful without extraordinary signage. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 October 17, 2002 Councilmember Harper stated that he is not voting in favor of the proposal out of fear of litigation; he likes the tenant mix; the residents want to shop in their own community; he wants to be there for the grand opening; and he welcomes the Zelman project to the City. Mayor Hunter stated that if there is no reluctance over litigation then why is a 35 -foot sign not acceptable. Councilmember Harper stated that a shorter 45 -foot, wider version was previously presented and was not accepted. Councilmember Mikos stated that she had wanted the applicant to come back to the Council with examples of both a short and tall version of the freeway sign; however, the Council voted to have a shortened, 66 -foot version of the tall sign return to Council. She stated that if litigation is still of concern, the Council should go into closed session. She suggested that the applicant approach Target again to request the elimination of the freeway- oriented pylon sign. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved to approve the Master Sign Program with the incorporation of the modifications recommended by staff and the Council. Councilmember Millhouse declared, as a point of order, that he takes exception to Councilmember Mikos' suggestion that the two dissenting members of the Council voted against giving the developer the option to come back with a shorter version of the sign; that the Council had already voted to allow a sign up to 78 -feet in height; and that the design of the sign was all that was under consideration at this time. Councilmember Mikos stated that she had reviewed the video tapes and it was clear that she had been outvoted about looking at both short (45 -foot) and tall (66 -foot) options when the majority of the council, including the two ultimately dissenting members, had wanted to see only 66 -foot sign options for additional consideration, not the shorter design options. Councilmember Mikos indicated that this was why no shorter designs remained for consideration at this time. () (1)01 G.5 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 MOTION: Councilmember Harper re: Councilmember Wozniak seconded the Master Sign Program with the modifications recommended by staff motion carried by voice vote 3 Councilmember Millhouse dissenting. October 17, 2002 Stated his motion and motion to approve the incorporation of the and the Council. The -2, Mayor Hunter and C. Consider Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II Revised Construction Plan and Scope of Work. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the Scope of Work identified in Option B, which includes an additional future appropriation of $523,110 and a loan from the General Fund to the Community Zone of $333,110 to be repaid with applicable Local Agency Investment Fund interest; and 2) Direct that the Park Improvement Fees to be paid by USA Properties for the Vintage Crest project be designated 100 percent to the Community Park Zone. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated that the loan would be repaid to the General Fund when additional Park Improvement Fees are paid by various developers. He went on to state that the General Fund Reserve was recommended as a source since there is not sufficient money in the other park zones. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that Option C could be repaid within approximately five years. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the anticipated $9.6 million in future park in -lieu fees comes from within the current City limits. He stated the Endowment Fund has specific identified uses, including City Hall, Public Works, and Police Facilities; and was never intended to be used for the Arroyo Vista Community Park Phase II purposes. In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Mr. Kueny stated that the recommendation for Option B is based upon Ms. Lindley's findings. He stated his recommendation would be for Option C, since the funds can be recouped and the primary parking lots should be paved due to the heavy usage at that park. Councilmember Millhouse concurred with Option C. �i° Q )143 fu Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 October 17, 2002 In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that the General Fund Reserve is in excess of $7 million. Councilmember Harper stated his support of Option C. There were no public speakers for this item. Mayor Hunter stated he would like additional dialogue on funding sources. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that Option C would use all available Community Park Zone monies, and the Endowment Fund could be used for the aquatics facility. He explained that the pool would not be jeopardized logistically, since that portion of the park would not be impacted; however, the financial question for the Endowment Fund and the General Fund is that the City still needs to rely on the interest income of those funds as revenue. He stated the benefit is that this is a loan with repayment within the next five years. Mayor Hunter stated that the City has been reluctant to build the swimming pool due to long term maintenance costs, not the initial construction costs. He went on to state his concern for using the Endowment Fund or the General Fund Reserve for construction rather than the use of Parks Funds to be repaid by future development revenues. Councilmember Harper suggested for future Council discussion, a less expensive, scaled -down aquatics facility for Poindexter Park, with a larger aquatics facility near the high school to be constructed later. Mayor Hunter expressed reluctance to use the Endowment Fund or General Fund reserve. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny explained that the Mayor is suggesting that the money in the other park zones be pooled and used first and that the General Fund reserve or Endowment Fund would be used only to supplement the remaining balance. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mayor Hunter stated that there is justification for loaning intra -fund, because Arroyo Vista Park provides a broad community attraction. He stated the balance would then need to come from either the General Fund or Endowment Fund. G'L 0�G? Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 October 17, 2002 Councilmembers Millhouse and Wozniak concurred that Option C was a good approach. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded the motion to select Option C with direction for staff to proceed and that the matter of the loan be referred to the Budget and Finance Committee to be reported at the next regular meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - October 16, 2002. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant Payroll Liability Warrants Regular Warrants 110768 - 110775 & $ 33,491.03 110867 110776 - 110783 1 11 $ 13,094.35 110784 - 110861 & $ 18,849.70 110862 - 110894 $ 731,442.79 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. B. Consider Adoption of a FY 2002/2003 Budget Amendment for the Senior Games. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2019, amending the FY 2002/2003 budget by allocating $750 from the Senior Trust Fund (6000) for the Senior Games Event. C. Consider Petition and Waiver to Increase the Assessment Amount for District 16 (ADO1 -03: Cabrillo). Staff Recommendation: Accept and approve the subject Petition and Waiver increasing the assessment amount for District 16 (Cabrillo) as described in the agenda report. D. Consider Rejection of Claim: Roger Dixon. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. G ) 68 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 October 17, 2002 E. Consider Resolution Amending the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Moorpark and Rescinding Resolution No. 2000 -1796. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2020. F. Consider Report of Annual Development Agreement Review, Established in Connection with a 35 -Acre, Detached Single- Family Residential Unit Project Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue, West of Leta Yancy Road (Formerly Liberty Bell Road) (Tract 5053, Pacific Communities). Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept the Community Development Director's report and recommendation that, on the basis of substantial evidence, Pacific Communities has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the agreement; and 2) Deem the annual review process complete. G. Consider Report of Annual Development Agreement Review, Established in Connection with Residential Planned Development Permit No. 97 -1, a 312 -Unit Apartment Project Located on the West Side of Moorpark Avenue, South of Park Crest Lane and North of the Arroyo Simi (Archstone Communities). Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept the Community Development Director's report and recommendation that, on the basis of substantial evidence, Archstone Communities has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the agreement; and 2) Deem the annual review process complete. H. Consider FY 2002/2003 Budget Amendment for Purchase and Installation of Park Monument Signs. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2021, amending the FY 2002/2003 budget by appropriating $14,000 from the Park Improvement Fund - Zone 3 (2113) and $6,000 from Park Improvement Fund - Zone 2 (2112) to the respective expenditure budgets for Tierra Rejada Park and Campus Park. I. Consider an Agreement to Provide Security Guard Services at the Moorpark Metrolink. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to select a firm to provide security services within the authorized budget and to execute the Agreement to provide security guard services at the Moorpark Metrolink Station. C00109 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 October 17, 2002 J. Consider Changing the Community Services Intern to a Full -Time Management Assistant and Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2022 to Amend the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Solid Waste Budget. Staff Recommendation: Approve the addition of a Management Assistant position (Range 46) in the Community Services Department, and Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -2022, amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Solid Waste Budget. 11. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance No. 289, an Ordinance of the City of Moorpark, California, Amending Title 15 of the Moorpark Municipal Code by Amending Chapters 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.14, 15.16, 15.18, and 15.20; Adopting by Reference and Amending the Current Editions of Certain Model Codes as Follows: Uniform Building Code, Volumes 1, 2, & 3, 1997 Edition, with Appendix; National Electrical Code, 1999 Edition; Uniform Plumbing Code, 2000 Edition; Uniform Mechanical Code, 2000 Edition; Uniform Housing Code, 1997 Edition; Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition; and the Uniform Administrative Code, 1997 Edition. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 289 read for the second time and adopted as read. Mr. Montes read the title of the Ordinance No. 289. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 289. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 289 read for the second time and to adopt Ordinance No. 289. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. CLOSED SESSION: None was held. C 0.111-1170 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 13. ADJOURNMENT: October 17, 2002 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 8:25 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California November 6, 2002 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on November 6, 2002, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny announced that Item 4.J. was to be discussed in closed session. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for discussion of Item 4.J. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 5:45 p.m. J. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957) Title: Administrative Services Director Present in closed session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; and one of the candidates for the Administrative Services Director position. The City Council reconvened into open session at 6:10 p.m. Mr. Kueny announced that there was no action to report and that only Item 4.J. was discussed. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 November 6, 2002 5. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 6:10 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk sq N "A ^+. �c > it aIN C C,i i If 0 �o CITY OF MOORPARK �O2- WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE 2002 -2003 FISCAL YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 04, 2002 SEQUENCE AMOUNT From To MANUAL 111225 - 111227 $ 262,412.40 WARRANTS VOIDED 110901 & 110930 & $ (46,778.76) WARRANTS 110978 & 111085 & 111295 PAYROLL LIABILITY 111217 - 111224 $ 12,630.17 WARRANTS REGULAR 111228 - 111291 & $ 15,486.12 WARRANTS 111292 - 111311 $ 240,771.48 TOTAL $ 484,521.41 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100031100000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 512.50 M112002 01359 - 0098- 9 /02HR /PE 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 512.50 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT 512.50 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 512.50 100041000000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 707.57 M112002 01359- 0001- 9 /02RETAI 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 707.57 100041000000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 11/20/02 29.47 M112002 01359- 0001- 9 /02RETAI 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 29.47 100041000000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 42.00 M112002 01359 - 0103- 9 /02PW 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 42.00 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT 779.04 TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 779.04 TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY CHECK AMT 779.04 TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY NET PAYABLE 779.04 100071000000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 108.00 M112002 01359 - 0103- 9 /02COM S 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 108.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT 108.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 108.00 100076100000 9231 U.S. POSTMASTER N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 11/20/02 300.00 M112002 12 /02SR CTR NEWSLETT 20 DECEMBER 02 11/20/02 111225 0.00 0.00 300.00 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT 300.00 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE 300.00 100083200000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 931.37 M112002 01359- 0103- 9 /02PW 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 931.37 TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT 931.37 TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE 931.37 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT 2630.91 TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 2630.91 0 L RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:15 !� 1 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 2200 3803 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 -85.50 M112002 01359 - 0001- 9 /02COM D 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 -85.50 2200 3803 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 -23.10 M112002 01359 - 0102- 9 /02COM D 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 -23.10 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT - 108.60 TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE - 108.60 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT - 108.60 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE - 108.60 220064300000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 1062.36 M112002 01536 - 0001- 9 /02GENER 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 1062.36 220064300000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 899.76 M112002 01536- 0001- 9 /02GENER 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 899.76 220064300000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 16.00 M112002 01536 - 0143- 9 /02WHITA 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 16.00 220064300000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 352.00 M112002 01536 - 0146- 9 /02MACNE 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 352.00 220064300000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 16.00 M112002 01536- 0142- 9 /02GURLE 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 16.00 220064300000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 991.19 M112002 01536- 0143- 9 /02WHITA 20 85225 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 991.19 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT 3337.31 TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 3337.31 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT 3337.31 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 3337.31 220064400000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 252.00 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02COMM 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 252.00 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT 252.00 TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE 252.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 3480.71 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 3480.71 `", RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING V� �t 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C. BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 250183108003 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 M112002 01359- 0103- 9 /02PW 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM CHECK AMT TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE ,9 i RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 PAGE 3 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 10/22/02 42.00 0.00 42.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2701 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 270124400000 9820 VENTURA COUNTY N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 ACQUISITION REPAYMEN 20 6479 -B PENN 11/20/02 111227 TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE 4L RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 a i. Q. PAGE 4 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 11/20/02 248765.14 0.00 0.00 248765.14 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 248765.14 248765.14 248765.14 248765.14 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 290224100000 9123 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 4776.41 M112002 01359 - 0145- 9 /02MISSI 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 4776.41 290224100000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 124.87 M112002 01359- 0001- 9 /02RETAI 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 124.87 290224100000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 10/22/02 112.00 M112002 01359 - 0099- 9 /02CRA 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 112.00 290224100000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 0.00 11/20/02 5.20 M112002 01359- 0001- 9 /02RETAI 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 0.00 0.00 5.20 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT 5018.48 TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE 5018.48 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 5018.48 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 5018.48 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT 5018.48 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE 5018.48 P- RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 11/25/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT CITY OF MOORPARK, CA NET PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 10/22/02 1045.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 5001 - SOLID WASTE AB939 10/22/02 597.56 0.00 0.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 500175307502 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0103- 9 /02COM S 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 500175307502 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0103- 9 /02COM S 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 PAGE 6 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/22/02 1045.00 0.00 0.00 1045.00 0.00 10/22/02 597.56 0.00 0.00 597.56 1642.56 1642.56 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1642.56 1642.56 1642.56 1642.56 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 6399 - TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 6399 2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02TOLL 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 6399 2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0102- 9 /02TOLL 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI CHECK AMT TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI NET PAYABLE TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI CHECK AMT TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 Cr'r SALES TAX USE TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISC DATE DISC AMT 10/22/02 0.00 10/22/02 0.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE 7 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 10.50 10.50 70.00 70.00 80.50 80.50 80.50 80.50 80.50 80.50 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA USE TAX ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 6513 - ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 8.40 0.00 0.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 6513 2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02ZELMA 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 6513 2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02ZELMA 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER NET PAYABLE TOTAL ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER NET PAYABLE fi g RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:16 PAGE 8 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/22/02 8.40 0.00 0.00 8.40 0.00 10/22/02 56.00 0.00 0.00 56.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 64.40 64.40 64.40 64.40 64.40 64.40 11/25/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 4.20 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 4.20 FUND - 6594 - MELISSA L BARON 0.00 0.00 28.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT 32.20 CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 6594 32.20 2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02BARON 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 6594 2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359- 0102- 9 /02BARON 20 85223 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL MELISSA L BARON CHECK AMT TOTAL MELISSA L BARON NET PAYABLE TOTAL MELISSA L BARON CHECK AMT TOTAL MELISSA L BARON NET PAYABLE -� RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:17 G. c-' PAGE 9 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/22/02 4.20 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.00 10/22/02 28.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 6908 - ADELPHIA BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 6908 2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0001- 9 /02ADELP 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 6908 2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0001- 9 /02ADELP 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL ADELPHIA CHECK AMT TOTAL ADELPHIA NET PAYABLE TOTAL ADELPHIA CHECK AMT TOTAL ADELPHIA NET PAYABLE �.� RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:17 SALES TAX USE TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISC DATE DISC AMT 10/22/02 0.00 10/22/02 0.00 PAGE 10 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 100.00 100.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 15.00 15.00 115.00 115.00 115.00 115.00 115.00 115.00 11/25/02 DISC DATE CITY OF MOORPARK, CA DISC AMT ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 70.50 FUND - 6911 - EQUILON PIPELINE 70.50 0.00 10/22/02 470.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 6911 2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0001- 9 /02EQUIL 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 6911 2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N 11/20/02 1101 M112002 01359 - 0001- 9 /02EQUIL 20 85224 11/20/02 111226 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL EQUILON PIPELINE CHECK AMT TOTAL EQUILON PIPELINE NET PAYABLE TOTAL EQUILON PIPELINE CHECK AMT TOTAL EQUILON PIPELINE NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE GO Oi RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 17:21:17 PAGE 11 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/22/02 70.50 0.00 0.00 70.50 0.00 10/22/02 470.00 0.00 0.00 470.00 540.50 540.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 540.50 540.50 540.50 540.50 262412.40 262412.40 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 100021000000 9223 M. LEE SMITH PUBLISH N 11/25/02 1101 0.00 AP103002 ADVANCED EMP ISSUES 20 STEVE KUENY 10/30/02 110978 V 0.00 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE f� F- f; RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 16:06:24 PAGE 1 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 11/09/02 - 549.00 0.00 - 549.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 549.00 - 549.00 - 549.00 - 549.00 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C. BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 250183108003 9610 CAMARILLO ESCROW COM N 11/25/02 1101 0.00 M101702 LA AVE WIDENING -MAUR 20 PROPERTY ACQ 10/17/02 110901 V 0.00 TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM CHECK AMT TOTAL LA AVE MAUREEN TO BELTRAM NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE �y RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 16:06:24 PAGE 2 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 10/17/02 - 46025.00 0.00 - 46025.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 46025.00 - 46025.00 - 46025.00 - 46025.00 11/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 290224100000 9252 BEST ELECTRIC M 11/25/02 1101 0.00 10/11/02 - 204.76 AP103002 6479 -B PENN POWER OU 20 940820 10/30/02 110930 V 0.00 0.00 - 204.76 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT - 204.76 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE - 204.76 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER CHECK AMT - 204.76 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER NET PAYABLE - 204.76 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT - 46778.76 TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE - 46778.76 `fps F�> �7 Fk RUN DATE 11/25/02 TIME 16:06:24 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING QO PENTAMATION - t-qD ACCOUNTING DATE: 11/20/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 10:45:51 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 111217 1101 11/22/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 111218 1101 11/22/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 111218 1101 11/22/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 111219 1101 11/22/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 111220 1101 11/22/02 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 111221 1101 11/22/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 111222 1101 11/22/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 111223 1101 11/22/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 111223 1101 11/22/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 111224 1101 11/22/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- CANCER INSURANCE F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP UNION DUES CASE #SD020444 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION ID #9600616061 F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP P/T REG DEFER COMP PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 AMOUNT 114.32 3,331.11 1,050.13 4,381.24 403.33 2,172.50 118.00 168.46 3,425.29 1,543.92 4,969.21 303.11 12,630.17 12,630.17 PENTAMATION - . -..D ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 11/20/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:45:54 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT C) �%a+ 4 -� AMOUNT 12,630.17 12,630.17 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 08:43:07 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111228 1101 11/27/02 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 9 /02AVRC CELLPHONE 12.09 111229 1101 11/27/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 11/08 720.00 111230 1101 11/27/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9304 PW GLOVES 38.18 111230 1101 11/27/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9205 AVCP SIGN BOLTS 7.51 TOTAL CHECK 45.69 111231 1101 11/27/02 1032 AMERICAR 9254 #18 TRUCK SMOG CHECK 51.75 111232 1101 11/27/02 1037 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER 9205 10 /02CH BREAKROOM SUP 153.27 111233 1101 11/27/02 3369 AUTOMATIC STOREFRONT SERV 9103 SR CTR DOOR REPAIR 126.50 111234 1101 11/27/02 2860 B.T.R. INC. 9244 11 /8TEEN EVENT PIZZA 240.00 111235 1101 11/27/02 3376 BAY ALARM 9103 APRICOT ROOM ALARM SR 85.00 111236 1101 11/27/02 1058 BEST ELECTRIC 9252 6479 -B PENN OUTAGE 150.00 111237 1101 11/27/02 3365 BOGOYEVAC, JUSTIN M. 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 111238 1101 11/27/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2734 HITCH RANCH ADMIN FEE 53.78 111238 1101 11/27/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2751 HITCH RANCH SPEC PLAN 358.50 111238 1101 11/27/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 3806 HITCH RANCH ADMIN REV -53.78 TOTAL CHECK 358.50 111239 1101 11/27/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 #15 2 NEW TIRES 149.56 111240 1101 11/27/02 1081 BUDDY'S ALL STARS 9204 STAFF SHIRTS FOR AVRC 610.40 111241 1101 11/27/02 1082 BUILDING NEWS 9220 THE GREENBOOK 2003 141.32 111242 1101 11/27/02 2294 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS 9223 03 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 255.00 111243 1101 11/27/02 1108 CAPITOL ENQUIRY INC 9220 LEGISLATIVE DIRECTORY 58.19 111244 1101 11/27/02 3206 CHRISTENSEN, MICHAEL S 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 111245 1101 11/27/02 1126 CITY CLERK ASSOC OF CALIF 9221 02/03 MEMBERSHIP DUES 210.00 111246 1101 11/27/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 AVRC RR BACKFLOW 295.61 111247 1101 11/27/02 1143 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GR 9630 AVCP SRVCS 83.88 111248 1101 11/27/02 3178 COMPLETE PROPERTY MAINTEN 9102 11 /02FOUNTAIN MAINT 200.00 111249 1101 11/27/02 3250 CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHU 3401 YOUTH MTGS &OVERPYMT 734.00 111250 (�t1101 11/27/02 3370 DELEGGE, CHRIS 3865 REFUND- FORFEIT FEE 40.00 � 111251 111251 1101 :1101 11/27/02 11/27/02 1184 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 9244 FREIGHT - WINTER CAMP WINTER CAMP CRAFT SUPPLIE 16.62 110.73 t A TOTAL CHECK 127.35 111252 1101 11/27/02 1213 ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATION 9205 40 ENTERTAINMENT BOOK 760.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 08:43:07 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND PAGE NUMBER: 2 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR - - - - - -- ACCT DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111253 1101 11/27/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9230 WILLIAMS TO CA JPIA 7.42 111254 1101 11/27/02 1220 FENCE FACTORY RENTALS 9252 FITCH AVE FENCE REPAI 234.46 111254 1101 11/27/02 1220 FENCE FACTORY RENTALS 9252 11 /20- 12 /19FITCH AVE 38.50 TOTAL CHECK 272.96 111255 1101 11/27/02 2901 GONZALES, BRYAN 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 40.00 111256 1101 11/27/02 3371 GRASEL, BETH 2606 REFUND -TR PRK DEPOSIT 75.00 111257 1101 11/27/02 3372 GROSSMAN, HEATHER 2606 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS 75.00 111258 1101 11/27/02 2839 HELMET HOUSE, INC 2606 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS 100.00 111259 1101 11/27/02 1272 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C 9244 10/26 EVENT LIGHT TOW 122.81 111260 1101 11/27/02 1757 HESS, KIM 3862 REFUND- COOKING CLASS 38.00 111261 1101 11/27/02 1274 HILTI INC 9321 GRAFFITI REMOVAL GEL 527.67 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 ALL PARKS SUPPLIES 102.02 111262 1101 11/27/02 1263 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 AVRC BREEZEWAY PARTS 259.31 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 AVRC REPAIRS 67.18 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 COM FACILITIES TOOLS 198.28 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PARKS TOOLS 198.29 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 AVRC ROOF REPAIRS 77.86 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PW OPERATING SUPPLIES 51.45 111262 1101 11/27/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9304 PW RAINBOOTS 14.99 TOTAL CHECK 969.38 111263 1101 11/27/02 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9252 AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIE 105.53 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 RILEY -CC MIT CONF 25.00 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 EZ2 -SEPT & OCT INTERN 90.00 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 HERNANDEZ -VCEDA CONFE 125.00 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9225 RILEY -ICMA CONF LODGI 522.24 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 MPK CANDIDATES FORUM 30.00 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 MPK CANDIDATES FORUM 10.00 111264 1101 11/27/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 MPK CANDIDATES FORUM 10.00 TOTAL CHECK 812.24 111265 1101 11/27/02 2849 INTOXIMETERS 9504 MPK PD PRINTER 609.88 111266 1101 11/27/02 3170 KEISLER, JOHN R. 9103 TREE CONSULTING SRVCS 480.00 111267 1101 11/27/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 11 /02AVRC JANITORIAL 960.00 111268 1101 11/27/02 1316 KELLY PAPER 9205 AVRC PAPER SUPPLIES 111.51 111269 1101 11/27/02 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 CNTRY MEADOWS S/W REP 131.38 111269,E ...% 1101 TOTAL 11/27/02 CHECK 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 CNTRY MEADOWS S/W REP 105.11 236.49 �II 111270 _ 1101 11/27/02 2778 LEMAY, CAPTAIN ROBERT 9240 MOORPARK ROTARY DUES 140.00 A PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 08:43:07 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------------- VENDOR -------------- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111271 1101 11/27/02 3374 MARTIN, VICTORIA 3862 REFUND- SINGING CLASS 50.00 111272 1101 11/27/02 1366 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY 9252 AVRC DOOR SEAL 53.36 111273 1101 11/27/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 11 /13- 12 /10STORAGE RN 137.28 111273 1101 11/27/02 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 11 /8- 12 /5SKATERAMP RN 72.40 TOTAL CHECK 209.68 111274 1101 11/27/02 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY 9204 VECTOR LAY MASH 9.35 111275 1101 11/27/02 2189 MORGENSTERN, ROBERT PETER 9241 EMP MTG TABLE DECORAT 135.75 111276 1101 11/27/02 2905 NAVARRO, MICHAEL 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 111277 1101 11/27/02 1823 NEW PIG 9304 CONTAINMENT UNIT 194.21 111278 1101 11/27/02 1722 P. SCOTT VOLTZ & ASSOCIAT 9102 APPRAISAL SRVCS 750.00 111279 1101 11/27/02 2426 PARMA 9221 03 TRAFFENSTEDT DUES 100.00 111280 1101 11/27/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 BENSON BUSINESS CARDS 101.89 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 20.22 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.29 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.28 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 18.11 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.52 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 65.84 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 17.75 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 20.53 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 20.53 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 20.54 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 34.32 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 18.11 111281 1101 11/27/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.38 TOTAL CHECK 586.00 111282 1101 11/27/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 AVRC SUPPLIES 29.71 111282 1101 11/27/02 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 86.41 TOTAL CHECK 116.12 111283 FN 1101 11/27/02 3373 REINHARDT, CHRISTINE 3862 REFUND- COOKING CLASS 38.00 111284 p� 1101 11/27/02 3119 ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY CONT 9222 12 /17MARTIN WOMENS CO 156.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 08:43:07 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT ------- DESCRIPTION - -- 111285 1101 11/27/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9103 APRICOT ROOM DOOR REP 111286 1101 11/27/02 3375 SIMI VALLEY PLUMBING 9252 661 MPK DISPOSAL REPA 111287 1101 11/27/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 111287 1101 11/27/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 111287 1101 11/27/02 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 AVRC SUPPLIES TOTAL CHECK 111288 1101 11/27/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9205 MTN MEADOWS PRK 111289 1101 11/27/02 3204 VANDAVEER, DOROTHY J 9103 5/8 & 11/7 MTG MINUTE 111290 1101 11/27/02 1160 VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR 9212 12 /02VECTOR LEASE 111291 1101 11/27/02 1048 WEST GROUP 9220 CA CODES V52,V52A,V28 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT t PAGE NUMBER: 4 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 AMOUNT 475.00 220.00 6.41 274.93 25.38 306.72 11.24 150.00 320.65 150.15 15,486.12 15,486.12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 08:43:11 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/02 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 243.27 1000 GENERAL FUND 10,449.13 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 149.56 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 83.88 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -53.78 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 200.00 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 806.92 2605 GAS TAX 782.02 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 609.88 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 220.00 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 1,332.96 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 250.00 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 412.28 TOTAL REPORT 15.486.12 4... ILI)t; l�O PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:06:22 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111292 1101 12/04/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2734 NORTH PRK ADMIN FEE 3,032.42 111292 1101 12/04/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 3806 NORTH PRK ADMIN REVEN - 3,032.42 111292 1101 12/04/02 1070 BONTERRA CONSULTING CORP 2751 NORTH PRK SPECIFIC PL 20,216.15 TOTAL CHECK 20,216.15 111293 1101 12/04/02 1903 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT 9221 03 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2,170.00 111294 1101 12/04/02 3362 CENTURY CONSTRUCTORS, INC 9620 284 CHARLES ST 39,928.50 111295 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES VOID: MULTI STUB CHECK 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.240- 10 /02D MOOREHE 504.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.307- 10 /02USA PROP 4,765.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.333- 10 /02ZELMAN DE 220.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.339- 10 /02ZELMAN DE 1,311.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 10 /02ADELPHIA 473.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.470- 10 /02MTN MEADO 962.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.471- 10 /02MTN MEADO 1,120.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.021 -10/02 6717 ASP 165.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.090- 10 /02LARRY CAV 19.60 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.100- 10 /02WIDINER 15.05 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.323- 10 /02LENNAR 3,426.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.073- 10 /02ACCESS RD 86.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.160- 10 /02WM LYON 503.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 12/02 NOTE PYMT - 12,307.78 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.300- 10 /02CALLEGUAS 1,347.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.170- 10 /02DON HOLME 51.10 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.102- 10 /02WIDINER 269.36 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.214- 10 /02MPK PARTN 239.47 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.210- 10 /02M TESSIER 30.10 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.330- 10 /02CHAPARRAL 3,156.71 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /02ENG RETAI 347.63 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 10 /02TRFC RETA 219.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 10 /02TRFC RETA 219.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003- 10 /02ENCROACHM 1,593.90 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /02ENG RETAI 2,085.74 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 10 /02MILLER PR 1,419.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 92.320 -10/02 284 CHAR 48.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.019- 10 /02GUERRERO 19.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.030 -10/02 02 OVERL 6,583.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.140 -10/02 T RAMPS 5,350.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.280- 10 /02MCCOLLUM 19.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.290- 10 /02IACOBELLI 13.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 10 /02ENG RETAI 347.63 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.310- 10 /02SKYVIEW 9.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 10 /02LA AVE AL 5.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 10/02SR23 BYPASS LA A 39.84 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 92.030 -10/02 02 OVERL 148.89 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.370- 10 /02MORRISON 164.00 111296 fs,1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.327- 10 /02LENNAR 46.20 111296 ��'1101 rwilol 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 92.340 -10/02 DESIGNER 350.00 111296 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.336- 10 /02LENNAR 85.50 111296 .1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.055- 10 /02PCH HILL 187.50 111296 ( N1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.164- 10 /02TOLL BROS 39.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.165- 10 /02TOLL BROS 323.25 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.166- 10 /02TOLL BROS 612.25 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:06:22 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.241- 10 /02D MOOREHE 507.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.043- 10/02TR5130 19.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.305- 10 /02USA PROPE 742.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.310- 10 /02USA PROPE 68.25 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.376- 10 /02HIGH SCHO 75.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.501- 10 /02SHARMA IP 243.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.070- 10 /02NATIONAL 933.75 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 10 /02CYPRESS 1,778.25 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.035- 10 /02SHEA HOME 86.68 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.334- 10 /02TRI CITY 51.10 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.200- 10 /02RJR ENGIN 19.50 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.133- 10 /02ARMET DAV 270.06 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.308- 10 /02WM LYON 1,638.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.237- 10 /02CABRILLO 1,592.95 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 10 /02SHEA HOME 3,662.25 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.234- 10 /02CABRILLO 1,750.00 111296 1101 12/04/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.236- 10 /02CABRILLO 1,513.25 TOTAL CHECK 41,590.73 111297 1101 12/04/02 1136 COACH USA 9102 10/02 MPK BUS MAINTEN 20,747.38 111298 1101 12/04/02 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 MPK PD COMPUTERS 2,711.28 111299 1101 12/04/02 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 LA AVE /BELTRAMO RD 6,092.50 111300 1101 12/04/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 11 /02SR CTR CLEANING 589.00 111301 1101 12/04/02 1671 MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL D 9212 11/02 ELECTRICITY USE 2,679.00 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02VECTOR PHONE 26.71 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02FINANCE PHONE 10.42 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02C MGR PHONE 10.42 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02CITYWIDE PHONE 1,095.25 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02CAMPUS PAYPHONE 59.74 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02C CLERK PHONE 10.44 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02CAMPUS CYN PAYPH 59.74 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02GLENWOOD PAYPHON 59.74 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 10 /02EMRGNCY MGT PHON 168.02 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02POINDEXTER PAYPH 59.74 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02MILLER PAYPHONE 59.74 111302 1101 12/04/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 10 /02COMM CTR PAYPHON 53.91 TOTAL CHECK 1,673.87 111303 1101 12/04/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 10 /02HIGH ST PROJECT 2,530.00 111303 1101 12/04/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 10 /02MISC PROJ SRVCS 270.00 111303 1101 12/04/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 213 LA RELOCATION PLN 1,000.00 TOTAL CHECK 3,800.00 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 ZELMAN ADMIN FEE 117.00 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 ZELMAN ADMIN REV - 117.00 111304'- 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 WEST AMERICA CONST 130.00 111304 '� �" 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 WEST AMERICA ADMIN FE 19.50 111304 111304 1101 1101 12/04/02 12/04/02 2968 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 2752 WEST AMERICA ADMIN RE CABRILLO ECONOMIC -19.50 130.00 111304 - 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 TOLL BROS -CNTRY CLUB 325.00 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 CABRILLO ADMIN FEE 19.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:06:22 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------------- VENDOR - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 TOLL BROS ADMIN FEE 48.75 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 TOLL BROS ADMIN REVEN -48.75 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 SPECIAL DEVICES INC 357.50 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 SDI ADMIN FEE 53.63 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 SDI ADMIN REV -53.63 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 ZELMAN PROP -MPK MRKT 780.00 111304 1101 12/04/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 CABRILLO ADMIN REV -19.50 TOTAL CHECK 1,722.50 111305 1101 12/04/02 3241 REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORATI 9282 MPK MOBILEHOME REHAB 3,149.00 111306 1101 12/04/02 2820 SCE 9413 12 /02PREV NOT BILLED 1,551.79 111307 1101 12/04/02 2844 SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 9102 12/02 -3/03 675 MPK AV 156.00 111307 1101 12/04/02 2844 SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 9102 12/02 -3/03 798 MPK AV 150.00 111307 1101 12/04/02 2844 SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 9102 12/02 -3/03 799 MPK AV 180.00 111307 1101 12/04/02 2844 SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 9102 12/02- 3 /03AVRC MONITO 330.00 111307 1101 12/04/02 2844 SECURITY ALARM SERVICE 9102 12/02 -3/03 799 MPK AV 315.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,131.00 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 9 /11- 10 /11TRAFFIC SIG 1,278.93 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11PCH HILL PR 1,453.73 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11COMM CTR 2,298.59 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11PRKWYS & ME 114.02 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 1 17.84 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 9 /11- 10 /11CITY LIMITS 22,556.46 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 9 /11- 10 /11SCHOOL PROP 8.39 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 9 /11- 10 /11METROLINK 150.63 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9/11 -10 /11 798 MPK AV 119.16 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ST MAINT 88.31 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11REDEVELOPME 183.79 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11CITY HALL 2,014.53 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11AV PRK 2,923.89 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11VILLA CAMPE 93.19 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11TIERRA REJA 149.41 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11MPK MOBILEH 226.64 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11MTN MEADOWS 242.07 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11GLENWOOD 39.51 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11VIRGINIA CO 10.65 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 6 14.26 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 5 14.75 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 8 58.11 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11CAMPUS CYN 33.55 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11GRIFFIN PRK 69.84 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11VECTOR 85.89 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /- 11- 10 /11ZONE 9 1.88 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 10 132.50 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 11 12.96 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 12 240.18 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11CNTRY TRAIL 12.96 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 2 43.71 111308 / -.1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11CAMPUS PRK 39.89 111308 .1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 4 17.19 111308 h- -1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11PCH HILL PR 638.66 111308 1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11ZONE 7 38.88 111308 /(!:1101 12/04/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 9 /11- 10 /11AV COM CTR 1,578.67 IT `. PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 4 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:06:22 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 37,003.62 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02POINDEXTER PRK 735.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02COMM CTR PRK 194.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02VIRGINIA COL PRK 315.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02AV PRK & PED BRI 5,612.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02CIVIC /COMM CTR 525.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z6 GLENHAVEN W E 49.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 11/02 661 MPK AVE 42.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z7 MPK SQ IND PK 420.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02Z8 HOME ACRES BU 315.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z9 MPK BUS CTR 53.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02Z10 MTN MEADOWS 7,824.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02COLMER ALYSSAS 32.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9640 MILLER PRKWY WIDENING 1,425.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02VILLA CAMPESINA 284.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02MILLER PRK 735.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02PRKWYS & MEDIANS 5,631.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02Z1 PECAN,BAMBI 84.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z4 WMS RCH PRKWY 268.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z5 PCH HILL,TR 1,149.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02PCH HILL PRK 2,520.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02MONTE VISTA PRK 326.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02MTN MEADOWS PRK 2,468.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02TIERRA REJADA PR 2,520.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02GRIFFIN PRK 1,208.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02CNTRY TRAIL PRK 1,680.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02 798 MPK AVE 80.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02GLENWOOD PRK 1,018.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02METROLINK STATIO 299.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02CAMPUS CYN PRK 2,520.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11 /02CAMPUS PRK 803.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z3 PEPRML,BTR CR 137.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 11/02Z2 SPRING,CHR,TR 2,823.00 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 AVCP IRRIGATION REDES 4,431.16 111309 1101 12/04/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 11/02 18 HIGH ST 68.00 TOTAL CHECK 48,593.16 111310 1101 12/04/02 3377 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE 9418 02 /03WASTE DISCHARGE 2,500.00 111311 1101 12/04/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 10 /02VIDEO PROD SRVCS 2,250.00 111311 1101 12/04/02 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 10 /02GRAPHIC /BBS SRVC 672.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,922.00 TOTAL FUND 240,771.48 TOTAL REPORT 240,771.48 t. r4 Q` PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 09:06:27 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 3,604.78 1000 GENERAL FUND 16,094.59 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 2,884.34 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,417.22 2201 CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,149.00 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 28,309.87 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 101.84 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 2,866.71 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 137.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 285.19 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 1,163.75 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 63.26 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 458.88 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 373.11 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 54.88 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 7,956.50 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 44.96 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 240.18 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 33,473.27 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 6,097.50 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. - 12,307.78 2603 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A 12,082.39 2605 GAS TAX 1,586.74 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 2,711.28 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 43,955.14 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 2,463.79 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 21,197.01 6005 UW /CCB TR4340,1,2,3 &4792 239.47 6015 SUNCAL 19.50 6026 SDI 411.13 6047 WEST AMERICA 149.50 6140 BURGER KING 270.06 6199 KWIK CAR 504.00 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 3,748.93 6318 CALLEGUAS 1,347.75 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 5,005.70 6360 ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL 51.10 6375 PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W 187.50 6385 RICHMOND AM H 3,472.20 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI 1,348.25 6407 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING 85.50 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 1,778.25 6460 PERFORMANCE NURSERY /SCE 86.50 6480 M &M DEVELOPMENT 507.00 6489 NATIONAL READY MIX 933.75 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 2,429.00 6515 USA PROPERTIES 5,576.00 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 23,248.57 6541 SHARMA GENERAL 243.50 6546 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 2,141.50 6548 PARDEE CONSTRUCTION 164.00 6566 RJR ENGINEERING 19.50 6901 CHAPARRAL SCHOOL ENCROACH 3,156.71 6907 MOORPARK HS PARKING LOT 75.00 �t,T�s�. C° 6908 ADELPHIA 473.50 6910 SHEA HOMES 165.00 6912 ANTHONY CAVEN 19.60 6913 THOMAS CONSTRUCTION 2,082.50 C) PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 11/26/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:06:27 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/02 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 6915 RON WIDINER 284.41 6917 HOLMES ENTERPRISES 51.10 6920 MANUEL TESSIER 30.10 TOTAL REPORT 240,771.48 4� _+1 'SY MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL - -- AGENDA REPORT��i4�L�E�'�"`'' TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 12/4/02) SUBJECT: Consider Cancellation of January 1, 2003, Regular Meeting BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The January 1, 2003, meeting will need to be cancelled due to the holiday. Regular meetings are scheduled for December 18, 2002, and January 15, 2003. If any additional meetings need to be scheduled in January, staff's intent would be to request a special or adjourned meeting on either January 22 or January 29 (both are Wednesdays). This will provide a four -week time period between Council meetings (i.e., no meetings between December 18 and January 15). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to post a notice of meeting cancellation for the January 1, 2003, meeting. 0 �& 0 :002 .A ( Moorpark City Council Agenda Report To: The Honorable City Council From: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works ' Date: November 21, 2002 (Council Meeting 12 -4 -02) Subject: Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the 2002 Curb Ramp Project DISCUSSION A. Survey Staff has conducted a survey of all City streets to review the degree to which City streets and sidewalks accommodate handicap access. We discovered that there were a number of "T" intersections which did not provide a curb ramp on the "Thru- Street" side of the intersection. That is, there were curb ramps at the two corners of the side street, but there was no curb ramp across the street from the side street. Staff directed the City engineer to prepare plans for the installation of curb ramps at those locations. B. Scope of Work The locations of the additional curb ramps proposed to be installed are shown on the map attached as Exhibit 1. The project calls for the installation of thirty -two (32) new curb ramps. C. Fiscal Impact 1. Cost Estimate: A preliminary estimate of project costs is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Element Design Construction Constr Contingency (15 %) Inspection Total ._....... ......... ............................ Amount 11,214 36,025 5,404 3,000 55,643 .. .. .... .. .................... . ............................................... . ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cab Ra;np 2002 ad JO Curb Ramp Project 2002: Advertise November 21, 2002 Page 2 2. Budget: a)The FY 2002/03 Budget includes funding for Project 8030. That Project was established to construct projects funded (all or in part) by TDA Article 3 [SB -821] funds. This funding source is restricted to pedestrian / bicycle facility improvement projects. b)Project 8030 also includes local -share funding from Fund 2603: TDA Article 8 (Local Transportation Fund). c)It is anticipated that the amounts of the appropriations and budget for this project will exceed the budget. Any surplus appropriation will be returned to funding source Funds at the end of the fiscal year. d) A summary of the present status of (and the anticipated future amendment to) the budget for this project, is as follows: Description Fund 2603: TDA Article 8 Design Construction Inspection Total: Fund 2603 Fund 2602: TDA Article 3 Construction Total: Fund 2602 Total Budget 20,000 77,000 15,000 112,000 43,000 43,000 155,000 Anticipated Anticipated Actual Cost ($) Budget Surplus M 11,214 21,000 3,000 35,214 8,786 56,000 12,000 76,786 21,000 22,000 21.000 22,000 56,214 98,786 3. Future Use of TDA Article 8 Monies: It is the intent of staff to use the above anticipated Fund 2603 surplus, plus certain unappropriated Fund 2603 monies, to partially fund the Spring Road Widening Project [Project 8026]. That project will, in part, provide Class 2 Bike Lanes on Spring Road between New Los Angles Avenue and the rail crossing. D. Plans and Specifications A review copy of the Plans and Specifications for the subject project has been placed on top of the file cabinets in the City Council Conference Room. Curb Ramp 2002_ad Curb Ramp Project 2002: Advertise November 21, 2002 Page 3 E. Project Approval -- Design Immunity It is recommended below that the City Council approve the project plans and specifications in order to document City Council approval of the scope and design of the project. Such approval is also required for the purpose of establishing design immunity pursuant to Section 830.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. F. Schedule It is anticipated that bids for the subject project will be opened in late January and presented to the City Council for consideration in February. Construction on the project should proceed in March. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Map Curb Ramp 2002 ad 011, {�0(. ;) l_:`�° =J �l �� ���,�� ��� __ � rely r � � \ \s., � •�� OWL �� II s / I'r�� C �S •� � � i e �.,J�,E -ill. �U�'! �� /y 9dbt� z o s�i� v 4; ��,® �\ �� i�'P`° `,mom✓ `°°r /dry -� � F Iii hr It`�V�1 � _ r^ I _ �qti � °!-'• w_ �: ' � z / . y._ 1 ` � ; r n ice. �$ cuRb RAMPS LKzNz) • -.N5 -T I-\ L L U, M. P ❑ NO PED XING '�-1CIA �Q CITY OF MOORPARK TI) s MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT L. 1 �i'ur.4 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Hartnett, Recreation Superintendent ((IUU DATE: November 20, 2002 (CC Meeting of December 4, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Revised Budget for 3=d of July Fireworks Event, and Adoption of a Budget Amendment SUMMARY The City Council is being appropriating an additional Event, in order to enhance Twentieth Anniversary. The July Event would bring the original budget of $27,000. DISCUSSION asked to approve a budget revision $11,000 for the 3rd of July Fireworks the program to celebrate the City's proposed budget revision for 3rd of total event budget to $38,000 from an On June 5, 2002, the City Council approved a budget of $27,000 for the 3rd of July Fireworks Event in 2003. Each year, it has been the goal of the Recreation Division to recover as much revenue as possible to cover the direct costs associated with the event. In 2002, the July 3rd Event's direct costs were $23,613 with $19,215 in revenue being realized through fees and sponsorships. On July 1, 2003, the City will be officially celebrating its twentieth year of incorporation. Since the annual July 3rd Event closely coincides with the anniversary date, it creates a natural forum for a community -wide City Anniversary celebration. In order to make the July 3rd Event a special day, the Recreation Division is requesting an additional $11,000 to provide some enhancements for the day's activities. Specific embellishments to the July 3rd Event are as follows: ()4) C) #�ZON)7 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 2 • A bigger fireworks display • A skydiving team landing at Arroyo Vista Community Park • A City Booth with anniversary novelty items as give -aways • A hospitality area for event sponsors and VIPs In addition, the world - renowned musical group "Starship" (formerly Jefferson Starship) will perform as the headline band. Starship was selected to perform from dozens of other groups for a number of reasons. Starship's popularity during the decade of the 80's, several #1 hits, MTV recognition, their wide appeal to multiple generations, affordability, and availability make them a good choice. Starship will perform a ninety- minute act from 7:30 to 9:00 p.m., at which time participants will then enjoy the fireworks extravaganza, as a culmination of the day's activities. The City Council has already budgeted $5,000 for promoting the Twentieth Anniversary Celebration. This money will be used to publicize the upcoming anniversary through various means, design an anniversary logo, purchase promotional supplies and novelty give - aways, purchase paid advertisements, and for consulting fees associated with research of historical data. Since it continues to be the Recreation Division's goal to financially recover a significant portion of direct costs for the event, staff feels that there are a few ways to accomplish this task. On March 1, 2000 the City Council approved the establishment of a nominal event entrance fee of $1.00 for each person over 5 years of age. Last year, this fee generated $6,630. Staff proposes increasing the fee for the 2003 event to $2.00. This will generate an approximate additional amount of $6,600, for a total of $13,230. Given the expectation that more people will attend next year's event than ever before, this figure could even be higher. In addition, because of the added enhancements, staff feels that an additional $5,000 in revenue can be achieved through sponsorships and vendor fees. Total revenues estimated for the Fireworks Event is $30,730. The actual cost to the General Fund, after expenditures & revenues have been completed, will be $7,270. Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 3 PROPOSED BUDGET EXPENDITURES REVENUE Event Expenditures $38,000 Donations $15,000 Entrance Fee 13,230 Vendor Fee 2,500 TOTAL $38,000 $30,730 The City Council is being asked to approve a revised budget for the 3rd of July Fireworks Event of $38,000. With the Council's approval, the additional $11,000 will be included in the FY 2002/03 budget for expenditure prior to July 1, 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote Required) 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2002 - budget by appropriating an General Fund Reserve Balance amending the FY 02/03 additional $11,000 from the for the July 3rd Event, and 2. Approve the $2.00 per person entrance fee for individuals over the age of 5 years old for the July 3, 2003 Event. 0 001 6 3 Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 2002/03 BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURES RELATED TO JULY 3RD EVENT BY APPROPRIATING $11,000.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE BALANCE (1000) TO THE RECREATION DIVISION EXPENDITURE BUDGET (1000.7630). WHEREAS, on June 5, 2002, the City Council adopted the FY 2002/30 Budget; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2002, staff presented the Council with a report which requests the appropriation of $11,000.00 from the General Fund Reserve Balance (1000.7630) for the July 3rd Event; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A" hereof describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line items. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment to allocate $11,000.00 from the General Fund Reserve Balance, to the Recreation Division expenditure budget, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk 00040 -it. Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 5 Attachment Resolution No. 2002- EXHIBIT A Budget Revision A. Fund Allocation: Fund No. Fund Name Amount 1000.5500 General Fund $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $38,000.00 B. Budget Appropriation: BUDGET NUMBER BUDGETED REVISION NEW BUDGET 1000.7630.7621.9244 $27,000.00 $11,000.00 $38,000.00 Approved to Form: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ....'. TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Hartnett, Recreation Superintendent Peggy Rothschild, Senior Center Coordinator DATE: November 25, 2002 (cc Meeting of December 4, 2002) SUBJECT: Request for Proposal for Older Americans Act Grant Funds for Senior Center Health and Wellness Programs DISCUSSION The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution approving and authorizing this grant application through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging to secure funds for health and wellness screenings at the Moorpark Senior Center. The Ventura County Area Agency on Aging ( VCAAA) has issued a Request for Proposals for Preventive Health and /or Wellness Programs Provided by Senior Centers in. Ventura County. VCAAA will fund accepted projects for $5,000 to promote wellness and /or preventive health programs for senior citizens from January 1, 2003, through June 30, 2003. These funds are being awarded through the Older Americans Act, Title III D. Grant applications are due December 3, at 4:00 p.m.; however, VCAAA will allow the City to submit a signed adopted Resolution authoring its grant application on December 5, following the City's December 4 Council meeting. Moorpark Senior Center strives to provide a well- balanced mix of recreation, health and wellness activities for older adults. Grant funds would be used to establish `Friday Fitness Fairs" to provide health and wellness screenings at the Moorpark Senior Center. Screening asymptomatic people who may be at -risk of developing disabling or deadly conditions can change their lives. In today's healthcare market, many seniors may not receive testing until they are exhibiting symptoms, preventing a proactive approaching to maintaining health. "Friday Fitness Fairs „ would provide free health and wellness services to seniors age 60 and up at the Moorpark Senior Center and focus on testing and education in four areas: stroke prevention, osteoporosis, diabetes and cholesterol. The fitness fairs will be held one Friday each month in February, April and June, and tie -in with other ongoing and special fitness activities. The Senior Center will work with three subcontractors to provide health screenings, and present educational programming related to the screenings on each event date. Proposal includes a component for expanded health and wellness services if additional funds become available. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , approving and authorizing this grant application through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging to secure funds for health and wellness screenings at the Moorpark Senior Center. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION REQUESTING MONIES FROM THE VENTURA COUNTY AREA AGENCY ON AGING (VCAAA)FOR OLDER AMERICANS ACT TITLE III FUNDING. WHEREAS, the City Council is dedicated to the support of quality programs for older Americans in the City of Moorpark; and WHEREAS, the participation at Moorpark Senior Center continues to grow and provides a site for numerous health and fitness programs; and WHEREAS, funds to provide essential health and wellness services at the Senior Center are available in the form of a grant through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the grant application through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging to secure funds for health and wellness screenings at the Moorpark Senior Center. Further, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to serve as signatory for the City Council on all matters related to the administration of this grant. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby resolves to complete expend grant funds for health and wellness services prior to June, 2003 as stipulated in the terms of the grant contract. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Al-t) TT" MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Hartnett , Recreation Superintendent Peggy Rothschild, Senior Center Coordinator DATE: November 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of December 4, 2002) SUBJECT: Adoption of a FY 02/03 Budget Amendment for the Senior Center New Year's Event SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to approve a budget amendment for the Senior Center New Year's event. If approved, the proposed budget amendment would transfer $300 from the Senior Center Trust Fund to the Seniors New Year Eve expenditure budget. The proposed budget revision would bring the New Year event budget to $3,300 from an original budget of $3,000. DISCUSSION The Senior Center New Year's event features a sit down dinner, with volunteer servers, dancing and door prizes. This year's menu costs an additional $2 per person over last year's dinner. Staff and Advisory Committee members recommend an allocation of $300 from the Senior Trust Fund to cover the additional cost. The requested amount will be used to purchase dinner for 150 -160 individuals at the Senior Center New Year's event. All seniors pay a $12 charge to attend; monies received are deposited to the trust fund after the event. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call vote) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , allocating $300 from the Senior Senior Center New Year's event. Attachments: Attachment A and Exhibit B amending the FY 02/03 budget by Trust Fund (1000.2612) for the 0 (110 `.is Honorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 2002/03 BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURES RELATED TO THE SENIOR CENTER NEW YEAR'S EVENT BY APPROPRIATING $300 FROM THE SENIOR TRUST FUND (1000.2612) BALANCE TO THE SENIOR CENTER DIVISION EXPENDITURE BUDGET (1000.7610). WHEREAS, on June 5, 2002, the City Council adopted the budget for Fiscal Year 2002/03; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2002, staff presented the Council with a report which requests the appropriation of $300.00 from the Senior Trust Fund Balance for the Senior Center New Year event; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A" hereof describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s); and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Senior Trust Fund hereby approved. A budget amendment appropriating $300 from the as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A 0 ill, as r lonorable City Council December 4, 2002 Page 3 Resolution No. 2002- EXHIBIT A Budget Revision A. Fund Allocation: Fund No. Fund Name Amount 1000.2612 Senior Trust Fund $300 300 3,300 B. Budget Appropriation: BUDGET NUMBER BUDGETED REVISION NEW BUDGET 1000.7610.7623.9244 $3,000 300 3,300 Approved to Form: