Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AG RPTS 2002 0501 CC REG
Resolution No. 2002 -1967 Ordinance No. 280 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 1, 2002 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Tony Amatangelo, Life Spring Community Church. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 4. ROLL CALL: 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation Acknowledging the Month of May as Veteran's Appreciation Month. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. City Council Agenda May 1, 2002 Page 2 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY) 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1, An Amendment to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" and Minor Modification No. 4 to Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -1), Regarding Lighting Standards, on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss issues identified in the agenda report, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- , approving Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan, subject to conditions of approval; and 3) Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading, amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations ". (TRAFFENSTEDT) B. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01, a request for a Change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential, Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 Dwelling Units /Acre, a 22 -Lot Single- Family Residential Subdivision, and a Variance to Allow an 11.5 -Foot High Sound Wall on Property Located at the Northeast Corner of Flory Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company. Staff Recommendations: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval; 3) Adopt Resolution No. City Council Agenda May 1, 2002 Page 3 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) 2002- approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001- 01; 4) Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01; and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, and Variance No. 2002 -01 subject to conditions of approval, and including modification of TTM Condition No. 80 and deletion of RPD Condition No. 17.c. (TRAFFENSTEDT) 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Status Report on Ventura Council of Governments (VCOG) Staffing and Budget Options. (Continued from City Council meeting of April 17, 2002) Staff Recommendation: Continue VCOG Membership. (KUENY) B. Consider Rescheduling of Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to reschedule the joint City Council and Planning meeting for May 8, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. (TRAFFENSTEDT) C. Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee for Development Agreement with USA Properties Fund, Inc. (USA) . Staff Recommendation: Appoint an Ad Hoc Committee. (KUENY) D. Consider Recommendation of the Aauatic Facilitv Ad Hoc Committee to Postpone the Project. Staff Recommendation: Accept the Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation to postpone future action on the design of the Community Aquatic Facility. (LINDLEY) E. Consider Adoption of 2002 Legislative Program. Staff Recommendation: Adopt the 2002 Legislative Program. (CHUDOBA) F. Consider Report from Zelman Ad Hoc Committee regarding Pylon Sign Height and Location Entry Treatments. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. (KUENY) City Council Agenda May 1, 2002 Page 4 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 17, 2001. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of April 10, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - May 1, 2002. Manual Warrants 109078 - 109081 $ 12,461.65 109186 - 109191 $ 1,927.52 Voided Warrants 107267 & 108701 & $ (1,363.81) 108861 & 109081 & 109191 & 109207 & 109208 Payroll Liability 109192 - 109199 $ 11,534.25 Warrants Regular Warrants 109082 - 109185 & $ 23,166.36 109200 - 109238 $473,473.62 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider a Reauest for the Release of Sureties for Improvements Associated with Tract 4980, Residential Planned Development No. 98 -06, Specific Plan No. 92- 01. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to release surety #SD00100544 for $34,500.00. (FISS) D. Notice of Completion for the New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening Project. Staff Recommendation: Accept the work as completed and adopt Resolution No. 2002- . (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) (GILBERT) E. Consider License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League. Staff Recommendation: Approve a License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. (LINDLEY) City Council Agenda May 1, 2002 Page 5 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) F. Consider Plans and Specifications for City Hall Annex Generator Connection and Award a Contract to Venco Electric. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the design plans for the City Hall Annex back -up power system; 2) award a contract to Venco Electric, at a cost not to exceed $9,680; and 3) authorize the City Manager to execute said contract on behalf of the City and approve the use of energy conservation measure monies in the FY 2001/02 budget for the generator project. (LINDLEY) G. Consider Authorizing the Use of $20,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Previously Allocated to the Boys & Girls Club for Roof /Ceiling Repairs to the Club's Teen Center. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the use of $20,000 (FY 2000- 2001), previously allocated to the Boys and Girls Club for window replacement in the gym, for roof and ceiling repairs for the Teen Center. (BURNS) H. Consider Amending Previously Approved California Law Enforcement Equipment Program ( CLEEP) Expenditures. Staff Recommendation: Approve said modifications to the purchasing of the listed equipment with the mentioned CLEEP funds as contained in the agenda report. (LEMAY) I. Consider Granting Additional Administrative Leave to Designated Employees. Staff Recommendation: Approve granting of additional administrative leave consistent with the agenda report. (KUENY) J. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award a Contract, and Adopt a Budget Resolution for the Construction of the Restroom / Concession / Storage Facility at Arroyo vista Community Park. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the restroom facility; 2) award a contract to Tasco Construction, Inc. for $263,538; and 3) adopt Resolution No. 2002- , appropriating an additional $171,000 to the project from the Park Improvement Fund - Community Zone. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) (LINDLEY) City Council Agenda May 1, 2002 Page 6 12. ORDINANCES: 13. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) 14. ADJOURNMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II). MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 47 • A C.TTv nr tinnRTARK, CAT,TrnRNTA City Cmmcil Meeting oi' ACTTO : TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director Prepared by: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager; DATE: April 9, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1, An Amendment to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" and Minor Modification No. 4 to Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -1), Regarding Lighting Standards, on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. i Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan, prepared for Council consideration, would permit the parking lot lighting previously proposed for the Moorpark Marketplace at the southeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway. The lighting includes 25 -foot high light poles, drop -down lenses on the fixtures, and light values up to 8.2 foot - candles. On April 8, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the parking lot lighting. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On March 20, 2002, the City Council approved a Commercial Planned Development Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the Moorpark Marketplace, a 357,621 square -foot commercial center with 1,429 parking spaces at the southeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway. As part of the resolution approving these applications, Council directed the Planning Commission to initiate study of modifications to the Zoning Ordinance and /or Ordinance No. 195 (Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations) related to revisions to lighting standards in order to allow the proposed parking lot lighting. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on April 8, 2002 to consider proposed changes to the Carlsberg Specific Plan v �A V .✓ v .,�, Honorable City Council May 1, 2002 Meeting Page No. 2 and Ordinance No. 195. The changes would create specific lighting standards for the Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial /Business Park area of the Carlsberg Specific Plan to allow 25 -foot high light poles, light fixture lenses that drop down 2" from the fixture, and light values up to 8.2 foot - candles. The Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the changes. Commissioners commented that the 25 -foot high light -poles and drop -down lenses as part of decorative fixtures were appropriate for this site. Commissioners also noted that raising the height of the poles to 25 feet decreased the number of light poles needed, allowing for increased landscaping, and decreased energy use. The applicant requested more flexibility in a staff recommended condition for actual measured light values to be within 10 percent of those shown on the plan. The Commission discussed this issue with Mr. Tom Doyle, a registered electrical engineer under contract with the City for reviewing lighting plans. Mr. Doyle noted that the difference between a 10 percent and a 15 percent tolerance in measured foot - candles, as requested by the applicant, would not be perceptible to the eye. The Commission concluded that a 15 percent deviation in measured lighting values from those shown on the photometric study was acceptable, given standard industry tolerances in lamp and ballast specifications and the potential effects of building light and street light spillover into the parking lot. This change is reflected in the attached conditions for Council consideration. The staff report to the Planning Commission and the Resolution of the Planning Commission adopted on April 8, 2002 are attached. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This proposed commercial center is consistent with the Amended Carlsberg Specific Plan for which an EIR was certified. No further review is necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss issues identified in the staff report, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan, subject to conditions of approval. 3. Introduce Ordinance No. to first reading, amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations ". S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020501 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman Lighting.doc Honorable City Council May 1, 2002 Meeting Page No. 3 Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolution to Amend the Carlsberg Specific Plan with Conditions of Approval 2. Draft City of Moorpark Ordinance to Amend Ordinance No. 195 3. Staff Report to Planning Commission dated April 3, 2002 4. Resolution of the Planning Commission Recommending Conditional Approval Under Separate Cover: S. Ordinance 195 6. Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code 7. Photometric Study (Initial) 8. Photometric Study (Maintained) 9. Site Details 10. Lighting Specifications S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \CC 020501 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman Lighting.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDING SUBSECTIONS F.4 AND G.4 OF CHAPTER IV CONCERNING EXTERIOR LIGHTING STANDARDS IN THE SUB - REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS PARK ZONES WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Moorpark requesting Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -1) in order to amend Subsections F.4. and G.4. of Chapter IV concerning exterior lighting in the Carlsberg Specific Plan Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial and Business Park zones; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing on April 8, 2002, adopted Resolution PC- 2002 -423 recommending that the City Council consider and approve Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Exhibit A), subject to conditions of approval (Exhibit B); and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on , 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and reached its decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the following findings: 1. Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and the Carlsberg Specific Plan and will not materially affect the overall purpose and intent of the specific plan. 2. Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan is not extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in land use, would not have a substantial adverse impact on the surroundings, and would not change any of the findings ATTACHMENT C -��,.� Resolution No. 2002 - Minor Mod 4 to SP 92 -1 Page 2 contained in the environmental document prepared for the Carlsberg Specific Plan. SECTION 2. The City Council approves Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Exhibit A), subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: uenoran :�i. rrarrensteat, city clerk EXHIBITs A: Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan B: Conditions of Approval a t S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 minmod4 Amended Carlsberg SP.doc EXHIBIT A City Council Resolution No. 2002- Minor Modification No. 4 to SP -92 -1 Subsection F.4. (Page 57), Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial (SR /C) Site Development Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards of the Carlsberg Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, are amended by adding the following language: e. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally- maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. Subsection G.4. (Page 59), Business Park (BP) Site Development Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards of the Carlsberg Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, is amended by adding new subsection "g." and renaming existing subsection "g." to "h." as follows: g. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Resolution No. 2002 - Minor Mod 4 to SP 92 -1 Page 2 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally- maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. q--h. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 minmod4 Amended Carlsberg SP.doc EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 92 -1) 1. The parking lot lighting for the commercial center shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the photometric study plans and light specifications received by the City of Moorpark on April 2, 2002. 2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the actual photometric values shall be measured in the field by the City at the applicant's expense. Any discrepancy in excess of 15 percent from the lighting values shown on the plans shall be corrected to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. No changes to any of the specified light poles, light fixtures, lamps, or ballast units shall be made without prior approval by the Community Development Director. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 8119 -5.4 AND 8119 -6.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 195 "CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS" RELATED TO SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE SUB- REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS PARK ZONES OF THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a need exists to provide adequate standards and regulations concerning exterior lighting in the Carlsberg Specific Plan Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial and Business Park zones; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that standards and regulations affecting exterior lighting are necessary to ensure the public health, safety and welfare within the various neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing on April 8, 2002, adopted Resolution PC- 2002 -423 recommending that the City Council consider and adopt the amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as contained in Exhibit A to that resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council on 1 2002 conducted a public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and reached its decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8119 -5.4 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Sub- Regional Retail /Commercial Zone)" is amended by adding subsection "e" as follows: Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards e. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. ATTACHMENT_& Ordinance No. Page 2 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. SECTION 2. Section 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Business Park Zone)" is amended by adding new subsection "g" and renaming existing subsection ` %g" to "h" as follows: Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards g. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. g—h. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \cc 020501 ZOA2002 -1 zelman.doc Modified: 04/10/02 Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk 2002. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \cc 020501 ZOA2002 -1 zelman.doc Modified: 04/10/02 ITEM g A. CITY OF MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director 210e By: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager DATE: April 3, 2002 (PC Meeting of April 8, 20002) SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2002 -1, An Amendment to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" and Minor Modification No. 4 to Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -1), Regarding Lighting Standards, on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. BACKGROUND On March 20, 2002, the City Council approved a Commercial Planned Development Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the construction of a 357,621 square -foot commercial center with 1,429 parking spaces at the southeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway. As part of the resolution approving these applications, Council directed the Planning Commission to initiate study of modifications to Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance and /or Ordinance No. 195 related to revisions to lighting standards. This action responded to a recommendation of the Planning Commission to allow 25 -foot high light poles with drop - down lenses and lighting values in excess of 7 foot - candles for this project. DISCUSSION This staff report focuses on an amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as previously discussed by the Planning Commission to address lighting issues specific to the approved commercial center in the Carlsberg Specific Plan area and respond to an application filed on March 26, 2002 by Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. The applicant is requesting the amendment to Ordinance No. 195 to allow for the use of lighting poles 25 feet in height, lenses that drop down about two inches below the fixtures, and lighting values up to 8.2 foot - candles. Potential amendments to Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal ATTACHMENT, Planning Commission Staff Report ZOA 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4 April 8, 2002 Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. Page No. 2 Code (Lighting Regulations) will be studied and presented to the Planning Commission in the future as directed by Council. Existing Code Standards Comprehensive lighting regulations are contained in Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, attached to this report. Of particular note for this project are the maximum height of lighting poles for commercial uses (20 feet), the maximum light value for exterior parking areas (7 foot - candles), and the requirement that lights be shielded or recessed to direct glare and reflections within the boundaries of the property. Specific Plan Regulations Ordinance No. 195, adopted on September 21, 1994, contains development standards for the Carlsberg Specific Plan area, including the (SR /C) Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial overlay zone, where the project is located. Details or issues not specifically covered in these regulations are subject to the regulations of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code. In areas of conflict between the City's zoning regulations and these provisions, the Specific Plan takes precedence. The Carlsberg Specific Plan development standards for the (SR /C) Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial overlay zone establish minimum setbacks, maximum building heights, and minimum site landscaping requirements. Lighting is one of the issues not addressed by Ordinance No. 195, and therefore is regulated by Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Assessment of Proposed Lighting Plan The conceptual lighting plan is not consistent with certain elements of Chapter 17.30 (Lighting Regulations) of the Municipal Code. The applicant is proposing 82 lighting poles in the parking lot at 25 feet in height, lenses that drop down about two inches below the fixtures, and lighting values up to 8.2 foot - candles (maintained brightness). Given the large size of the parking lot, the number of 25 -foot high light poles needed to light the parking areas is substantially less than the number of light poles needed if the poles were set at 20 feet in height, allowing for increased landscaping. According to the applicant, a plan with 20 -foot high poles would require 152 poles to achieve similar lighting performance.. The higher placement of the light fixtures provides more even distribution of S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman Lighting Rptl.doc �d'^ 4'` v �— � _14J Planning Commission Staff Report ZOA 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4 April 8, 2002 Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. Page No. 3 light in the parking lot. Finally, the use of 25 -foot high poles is compatible with the scale of the architecture in this project, with typical building heights of 23 to 31 feet. The placement of lighting fixtures on higher poles could, however, increase the potential for off -site light spillover. In order to evaluate this potential, the City retained Tom Doyle, Chief Electrical Engineer of Dahl, Taylor and Associates to provide an expert opinion on the lighting proposal (attached) . Mr. Doyle's conclusion is that light cut off at the property line is at an acceptable level. In addition, the parking lot varies from approximately the same grade as New Los Angeles Avenue to 32 feet below grade. Most of the light poles on the eastern half of the project site would be less than 20 feet above the street grade. The drop -down lens proposed is an integral component of the proposed lighting fixtures. These lighting fixtures are a high - quality lighting product compatible with the architecture of the project. The lamp itself is recessed, but the lens drops about two inches below the shield. Review of this proposed lens also indicates that it would not contribute to off -site glare. •Ji The request to exceed the lighting values contained in the Zoning Code was also independently reviewed by Mr. Doyle. His conclusion is that it is reasonable for a commercial site to have an average lighting value of between 3.0 and 6.0 foot - candles (The average on this proposal is 3.63 foot - candles). It should be noted that these lighting values represent those values expected over the long -term maintenance of the project. According to Mr. Doyle, it is standard practice in the industry to measure lighting as it would be expected over time, with a 28 percent drop from initial brightness, due to environmental effects on lamps, reflectors, and lenses, as well as factory tolerances on lamps and ballast units. As stated before the Planning Commission on February 11, 2002, it is staff's opinion that a change to the maximum fixture height is justified. This is based on the lower elevation of the site when viewed from New Los Angeles Avenue and the need to decrease the number of light poles and increase the number of trees in the parking lot areas to achieve greater tree canopy coverage. The drop -down lens is also within the intent of the Zoning Code and is not expected to result in off -site glare. The lighting values are reasonable for a retail commercial center. Conditions have been added to the attached resolution for the Minor Modification to the Specific Plan that would ensure that the project meets the standards proposed in the Zoning Ordinance Amendment. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zenf 1. n IS , Lighting Rptl.doc Planning Commission Staff Report ZOA 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4 April 8, 2002 Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. Page No. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This proposed commercial center is consistent with the Amended Carlsberg Specific Plan for which an EIR was certified. No further review is necessary. STAFF RECO14MENDATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss issues identified in the staff report, and close the public - hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan, subject to conditions of approval. Attachments: 1. Letter from Mr. Tom Doyle _ 2. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval Under Separate Cover: 3. Ordinance 195 4. Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code 5. Photometric Study (Initial) 6. Photometric Study (Maintained) 7. Site Details 8. Lighting Specifications F: o S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman Lighting Rptl.doc 4 -03 -202 2:d9PM FROM DAIS TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778 tefrc.t wit t —t sw"two" April 3, 2002 Mr. Dave Bobardt Planning Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Moorpark Marketplace Preliminary Assessment # of pages:6 Dear Mr. Bobardt: The following is my preliminary assessment of the photometric drawings and data that was delivered to Dahl, Taylor & Associates on April 2, 2002. These drawings are a revision to a previously delivered set and are a result of our conference call with the developer and architect on March 28, 2002. General: • These revised drawings are comprised of two different drawings. The first calculates initial foot - candle levels by using a light loss factor (LLF) of 1.00. The second calculates maintained foot - candle levels by using the 0.72 LLF. For the record, the LLF indicates degradation of the foot - candle level over time in an installation due to depreciating lamp output, dirt buildup, and material degradation. The number 0.72 is an industry standard for the LLF. Light Spill: • The analysis shows acceptable cut off per the City's requirements on all sides of the property. On the north, west, and south sides, there are probably existing light fixtures that will add to the overall footcandle levels. It appears that the East side is where light cutoff is more critical. With the reduced 250 -watt fixture, acceptable light cut off has been achieved at that property line. Drop Down Lenses: • The proposed fixtures have a lens that does drop down below the sides of the fixture. However: a) The lamp itself is still recessed so the fixture would not be a glare problem that the City's requirements forbid. b) The lens drop is minimal and is part of the style of the fixture. Fixture Height: • The fixtures do not meet the City's requirement of maximum height of twenty feet for commercial properties. However, that rule does break down a little when you are www.dobit000r.com dealing with a property of this size for the following reasons: • The quantity of poles needs to go up to meet the footcandle requirements. To avoid engineering @dahltoylor.com large differences between maximum and minimum foot - candles, you need more poles with less lumens per pole. Hayward . Poles that are much shorter or much taller than the building involved appear out of proportion. The twenty -five foot pole in this case is approximately the height of the Los Angeles building and would look acceptable. S° ° °`e°° ATTACHMENT C Santa Ana P. 1 4 -03 -202 2:50PM FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778 P.2 Footcandle Levels: • During our conference call, I asked for the initial photometric drawing so that if and when this installation is complete, the City and I (plus the contractor) could verify the numbers with a photometer and require the contractor to correct any discrepancies outside of some percentage like 10 %. Attached is a simple explanation why the actual installation can be up to 12.5% different than the design. The more important issue is the maintained analysis. • Regarding the maintained photometric analysis: a) It is reasonable for a commercial site to have an average of between 3.0 and 6.0 footcandles. A maximum of 8.2 foot - candles is not too far off the City's 7.0 maximum foot - candle requirement. b) Retailers want a well -Iii parking lot. One of the reasons that I don't think has been brought up is that retailers want to be brighter than their neighbors. I remember reading that when given a choice, shoppers go to the brighter parking lot. I will look for that article. c) The "brightness" that people will see will be from the reflected objects such as cars. Please call with questions or comments. Sincerely, DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6 Tom Doyle, PE ate Chief Electrical Engineer www.dohltoy or.com engineering @dohltoplor.com Hgword Los Angeles ^ n .� -,N� ,-r Son Diego -- . Heo4oarters Santa Ana 2960 Daimler Street Santo Ana, CA 91105 -5824 949.756.8654 FAX261.9778 4 -03 -202 2:50PN1 FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778 Understanding Outdoor Area Lighting Design A wide range of solutions can meet the diverse needs of site illumination. P. 3 Floodlight on pole m L to Shadow area 3 O I Building [--[),-2H D, =2 xmounting height Fig. 1. Length of shadow is directly proportional to the height of the /uminaire and the distance from the base of the pole. for a horizontal distance equal to twice the /uminaire mounting height; the shadow will be twice the height of the shadow - casting object. By Joseph R. Knisley, Senior Editorial Consultant P roperly preparing a lighting design for outdoor loading, storage, and fabricating areas is usually a difficult task. The lighting designer must ider whether stacked materials or heavy machinery will interfere with distribution, or whether work activities will obstruct or block some of the light distribution Picking lighting equipment for the job is sometimes more difficult with an outdoor installation than with an indoor area, because fewer fixtures contribute their light to a given area. Generally, this means there's little for lighting design 30). margin error in an outdoor (see sidebar on page Although you can install lighting equipment on any high structure, pole :j mounting offers the most versatility. Luminaires on poles can provide illumination in every direction at distances of two to two and half times the 28 October2000 • EC &M • www.electricalzone.com W J 4 -03 -202 2:51PM " 1 FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778 mounting height from the pole. Thus, luminaires on a singe prole can serve an area of about four times the mounting height—sgttared_ For example, a 50 -ft rx)le can cover about 40,%X1 --q k and a 150 -ft pole about 369.000 sq ft. You can use narrow beam floodlights to light a flat area extending u) five times the mounting height from the role. However. at distances greater than two times the mounting height, uniformity and system efficiency drop off considerably. You can see the effectiveness of minimi:ing shadows with a given mounting height in Fig. 1, on page 28. Thts figure shows that the rela- tionship between the length otshad- ows and the luminaire mounting; height follows the law of similar triangles. For a horizontal distance from the pole of twice the mount- ing height. the length of the shadow will be nice the height of the ob- ject casting the shadow. Once you establish the luminaire kxattons and mounting; heights, de- termine the quandry and t-,T e of luminaire. It you select tall rti-)les, Fig. 2. These six beam spreads serve most floodlighting needs. The effective projection distances of each type are also given. A beam edge is defined as 10% of maximum candlepower. you can use higher wattage lamps, which are more efficient than lower wattage light sources. Generally, 1000W or 75OW high - pressure so- dium (HPS) or metal -halide (MH) lamps are the choice for high mast When using.software, a contractor might find that aftet.thi Installation, n, differs from the rompurer-pted'Kted.410mi- nance: Why? A number of factors may cause this variation. First of all, site conditions frequently vary from the assumptions used in preparing the design. Then, consider that a lamp can vary ±5% in light output and still be within the manufacturer's tolerances. An HID ballast can vary ±7% and still be within tolerance. Thus, it's possible fora lamp/ballast combination to be 12.5% under the .predicted output. You may find that the installer skewed the lamp's arc tube or mounted the fixture slightly out of alignment -- resulting in the distribution of light at angles other than those intended. Another factor could be a reflector or a refractor also mounted slightly off axis, producing similar results. It takes only a few degrees of tilt to produce significant change in the light distribution pattem. Low voltage at the ballast of the fixtures could also be a problem, resulting from excessive voltage drop in the feeder.or branch - circuit conductors. A regulator -type ballast is available for such a situation. applications. In addition to choosing the lamp npe, wattage, and number and lo- cation ofluminaires,a designer must Picking fighting equipment for the job is sometimes more difficult with an outdoor installation than with an indoor area, because fewer fixtures contribute their light to a given area. CollsIdU the beam spread, or the :andlerxtwer dtstribution pattcm the luminaire provides. High mast luminaires and A- Wit_hts tlffrr s%mmetrical and asvumrctrical hram Spreakls. Naturally. a lu;:h m:Ist P. 4 4) C) V 4 -03 -202 2 : 52PM FROM F_-�HL TAYLOR :+. )JDGC 94926107716 r' • J r� I luminaire delivers most of its light directly downward. But, you can vary the beam spread of a high mast luminaire by vertically adjusting the lamp in the reflector assembly. You can also select reflector - /re- fractor -type units, which cast light at a high angle. When you rotate the optical assembly of an asym- metrical -beam, a high mast luminaire allows you to shape the distribution pattern of a cluster of these luminaires. Typically installed on structures and low poles, floodlights have a circular reflector, with the lamp mounted in the center. Floodlight beam spreads and their effective projection distances are classified by a joint IES/NEMA designation. The beam - spread patterns extend from Type 1 to Type 7. Fig. 2, on page 30, shows Type 2 to Type 7 beam patterns, which are the most widely used types. in all cases, as the distance from floodlight to the illu- minated area increases, the beam spread becomes wider. Type classification assumes a symmetrical beam shape, meaning that the beam spread angle in the vertical and horizontal axes are identical. Generally narrow pro- jection beams (Type 1, 2. 3, and 4), which are useful for directing a long throw of light, have a symmetrical beam spread. However, outdoor floodlights with Type 5, 6, and 7 beam spread have different beam spread for the vertical and horizon- tal axes, since they're generally used to project their light output at me- dium to close distances. You can use the following simple formula to rapidly figure the num- ber of units needed for a given light level or to determine the light level provided by a certain number of fixtures. fc = (N) (BL) (U F) WF) Area where, fc =average maintained illumi- nation level in foorcandles Fig. 3. Isofootcandle curves show light pattern and light levels produced by particular luminaire. Information is presented in terms of mounting height an distance from the pole. N = number of luminaires BL = beam lumens of the luminaire UT= utilization factor (percent- age of the beam lumens that fall within the area being lighted) MF= maintenance factor (light loss factor) Area =area to be lighted in square feet or square meters. If the lighting project must sat- isfy only general criteria, such a simple calculation is sufficient. However, a better method of de- sienine an outdoor li¢htine system is to use an tsotootcanale plot. An isofborcandle plot graphi- cally represents the light disaribu- tion pattern on a horizontal sur- face. The graph consists of a series of lines, or contours, that represent the same illuminance anywhere on the line, with each line represent- ing a different footcandle. Each contour from the center out repre- sents approximately 50% of the value of the previous contour. The plot is placed over a grid, which you can use to indicate mounting height divisions. An isofootcandle plot can vary in shape firm a circle, oval, or triangle, and may be sym- metrical or asymmetrical (see Fig. 3, above). Essentially, you can use an isofootcandle curve at the same scale as a plan view of the area to be lighted to determine the contri- bution of each luminaire to the entire area. Today, manufacturers have pow- erful and relatively inexpensive software programs to perform these calculations. Many of these pro- grams perform lighting design cal- culations based on isofootcandle curves and footcandle tables for each luminaire type. sum 32 October 2000 • EC &M • www.electricalzone.com C ON " " Circle 72 on Reader Service Card 0 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -423 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -1 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN SP 92 -1 REGARDING LIGHTING STANDARDS FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 29 -ACRE SITE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND MILLER PARKWAY, ON THE APPLICATION OF ZELMAN RETAIL PARTNERS, INC. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 512- 0 -260- 015, 085, AND 105) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on April 8, 2002, the Planning Commission considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan SP 92 -1 regarding lighting standards for an approximately 29 -acre site on the southeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway, on the application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0- 260 -015, 085, and 105); and WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically described as follows: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1: A request for a change to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" by adding lighting requirements to allow for 25 -foot high light poles, drop -down lenses, and light values up to 8.2 foot - candles; Minor Modification No. 4 to tl 1: A request for a change tc 25 -foot high light poles, values up to 8.2 foot - candles; ie Carlsberg Specific Plan 92- the Specific Plan to permit drop -down lenses, and light and WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 8, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, and reached a decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Planning Commission does hereby find that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Carlsberg S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 reso zoa 2002 -01 mm 4 zelman.doc e Modified: 04/09/02 ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -423 ZOA 2002 -1, MINOR MOD.4 to SP 92 -1 Page 2 Specific Plan 92 -1 and that the proposed modifications will not materially affect the overall purpose and intent of the Specific Plan. SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission further finds that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 are consistent with the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Specific Plan. SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 (Exhibit A). SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 (Exhibit B), subject to conditions of approval (Exhibit C). The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioner Parvin, Vice -chair Landis, Commissioner Dicecco, Commissioner Haller and Chair Otto NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2002. William F. Otto, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Acting Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. Draft Ordinance Amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 B. Amended Language to Chapter IV, Development Standards, Specific Plan 92 -1 C. Draft Conditions of Approval PP S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 reso zoa 2002 -01 mm 4 zelman.doc EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 8119 -5.4 AND 8119 -6.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 195 "CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS" RELATED TO SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE SUB - REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS PARK ZONES OF THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a need exists to provide adequate standards and regulations concerning exterior lighting in the Carlsberg Specific Plan Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial and Business Park zones; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that standards and regulations affecting exterior lighting are necessary to ensure the public health, safety and welfare within the various neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing on April 8, 2002, adopted Resolution PC -2002- recommending that the City Council consider and adopt the amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as contained in Exhibit A to that resolution; and Whereas, the City Council on , 2002 conducted a public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and reached its decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 8119 -5.4 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial Zone)" is amended by adding subsection "e" as follows: Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards e. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior %_� ...3 Ordinance No. Page 2 light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. - 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. SECTION 2. Section 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site Development Standards (Business Park Zone)" is amended by adding new subsection "g" and renaming existing subsection "g." to "h." as follows: Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards g. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. �h. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 zoa 2002 -01 zelman ord EXHIBIT A.doc Modified: 04/10/02 Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Ci-. n, n .-s c ., .�.� S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 zoa 2002 -01 zelman ord EXHIBIT A.doc Modified: 04/10/02 EXHIBIT B Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2002 -423 Minor Modification No. 4 to SP -92 -1 Subsection F.4. (Page 57), Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial (SR /C) Site Development Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards of the Carlsberg Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, are amended by adding the following language: e. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. Subsection G.4. (Page 59), Business Park (BP) Site Development Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards of the Carlsberg Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, is amended by adding new subsection "g" and renaming existing subsection "g." to "h." as follows: g. Lighting: 1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the ground to the top of the light fixture. All other exterior light poles shall conform to standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code. n^^d"V„r C S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 zoa 2002 -01 2elman EXHIBIT B.doc Modified: 04/10/02 Resolution No. PC- 2002 -423 EXHIBIT B Page 2 2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be used in the light fixtures, provided that the lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally - maintained condition. 4) All other lighting regulations contained in the Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply. #,1. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 zoa 2002 -01 Zelman EXHIBIT B.doc RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -243 ZOA 2002 -1, MINOR MOD.4 to SP 92 -1 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 92 -1) 1. The parking lot lighting for the commercial center shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the photometric study plans and light specifications received by the City of Moorpark on April 2, 2002. 2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the actual photometric numbers shall be measured in the field by the City at the applicant's expense. Any discrepancy in excess of 15 percent from the lighting values shown on the plans shall be corrected to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3.No changes to any of the specified light poles, light fixtures, lamps, or ballast units shall be made without prior approval by the Community Development Director. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 423 zoa 2002 -01 Zelman cond EXHIBIT C.doc Modified: 04/09/02 ITEM�1 �. ORDINANCE NO. 195 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 189 TO AG--) ARTICLE 19 "CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS" Whereas, Carlsberg Financial Corporation has filed an application with the City of Moorpark for an amendment to the adopted Carlsberg Specific Plan regulating development of an approximate 488.4 acre landholding located west of the Moorpark Freeway (SR23), east of Spring Road, north of Tierra Rejada Road, and south of New Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Moorpark; and Whereas, the Draft EIR, Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Amendments to the Specific Plan were considered by the Planning Commission and City Council at several public meetings and the City Council public hearing was closed on November 10, 1993; and Whereas, on August 3, 1994, the City Council directed staff to prepare an Ordinance which reflects the issues considered by the Planning Commission and City Council at the duly noticed public hearings, in order to amend the City's Zoning Regulations for the purpose of adopting the' amended Land Use Regulations of the Specific Plan as Zoning for the property; and Whereas, on September 7, 1994, the City Council Certified the Environmental Impact report for and approved the amendments to the Carlsberg Specific Plan; and Whereas, the changes to the Zoning and the Zoning Ordinance as directed by the City Council are for the benefit of the health and welfare of the citizens of Moorpark. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the modifications to the Zoning designation of the property described in the Amended Carlsberg Specific Plan have been studied in the Amended Carlsberg Specific Plan Subsequent EIR. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report was certified by the City Council on September 7, 1994. The amendments to the Zoning designation are described in attachment "A" to this Ordinance. SECTION 2. That the modifications to the City's Zoning Ordinance are categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). 11P08 +28:41 /10 r278nAr\ORD ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 3. That the Current Zoning Ordinance No. 189 is hereby amended by adding Article 19 entitled "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations" as enumerated in Section 4 are hereby adopted. SECTION 4. ARTICLE 19 CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS Sec. 8119 -0 - PURPOSE AND INTENT - The purpose of these regulations is to act as the controlling mechanism of the implementation of development within the Carlsberg Specific Plan area. Implementation of the standards set forth in this section will ensure that future development proceeds in a coordinated manner consistent with the goals and policies of the Carlsberg Specific Plan and the City of Moorpark General Plan. Future review of site plans and other necessary discretionary approvals by the City of Moorpark will ensure the realization of these standards. The following standards apply to development of all residential, business park, commercial, institutional and open space areas. All such development shall conform to the development standards as set forth in the specific plan for the permitted uses. It is recognized that certain development standards generally included as conditions of approval on development permit approvals may not be contained in the City's existing Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Ordinance. Such items include but are not limited to: onsite lighting standards; fixtures, lumin levels, coverage mounting and pole height; street lighting standards; front yard landscaping; bus shelters; private recreational areas for residential projects; quantities and sizing of trees and shrubs; general review /approval of landscaping and irrigation plans; review and approval of conditions, covenants and restrictions; requirements for homeowner /property associations; wall and fence style, location and height; rain gutters; yard drains; trash and recycling enclosures; slough wall for slopes adjacent to street rights -of -way and concrete driveways. The City may, at its discretion, condition any subdivision and /or development permit on all such matters. The City zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance shall have effect on all areas, except as specified by the standards contained herein. As the development standards of the Specific Plan are adopted by ordinance, in any areas of conflict between the City's zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance and these provisions, this Specific Plan shall control. Where the Specific Plan does not address development standards or provisions, the city's zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance shall control. Any future amendments to the city zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance which are not addressed by the Specific Plan or existing PP08t18 :91 110:27&&A:\0RD Zoning and /or Subdivision Ordinance shall also apply to tht, specific plan area as applicable. Sec. 8119 -1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS - Terms used in these regulationb shall have the same definitions as given in the City of Moorpark Zoning Code unless otherwise defined herein. Because it ii infeasible to compose language which encompasses all conceivable situations, the Director of Community Development shall have the power to interpret the regulations and standards contained in the ordinance, when such interpretation is necessitated by a lack of specificity in such regulations and standards. a. Any details or issues not specifically covered in these regulations shall be subject to the regulations of the City of Moorpark Zoning Code. b. These regulations are adopted pursuant to Section 65450 et seq. of the State of California Government Code. It is specifically intended by such adoption that the development standards herein shall regulate all develop- ment within the Specific Plan area. C. All construction and development within the Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code as amended and the various other mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire codes related thereto, as well as the City's standards for public improvements in effect at the time of construction of each public improvement. d. Grading plans submitted for all projects in the Specific Plan area shall be based on the city grading ordinance and shall be accompanied by geological and soils engineer's reports which shall incorporate all recommen- dations as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. The soils engineer and engineering geologist must certify the suitability of a graded site prior to issuance of a building permit. The final grading plan as it reflects development in the specific plan area shall be approved by the City Engineer. e. Planning Areas are defined as each land use area depicted in Exhibit 7, Land Use Plan. f. All landscape and /or grading plans shall include provi- sions for temporary erosion control on all graded sites which are scheduled to remain unimproved during the winter months consistent with the applicable City requirements. g. All setbacks are measured from the property line. Page - 3 - 2/94 Sec. 8119 -2 - GENERAL STANDARDS Sec. 8119 -2.1 - Screening - The following standards shall apply to all development except for single family detached subdivisions, which shall be exempt from screening: a. Parking areas abutting street: A screen such as a hedge, wall or berm, or other similar structure shall be installed along all parking areas abutting any street. Except as otherwise provided below, the screening shall have a maximum height of three and one -half (3 -1/2) feet. b. Where the finished elevation of the property is lower than an abutting property or street, appro- priate landscape screening shall be employed to screen structures /parking areas. C. A screen as referred to above shall consist of one or any combination of the following: 1) Walls, including retaining walls: A wall shall consist of stone, tile or similar type of solid masonry material a minimum of eight (8) inches thick. 2) Berms: A berm shall be constructed of earthen materials and it shall be landscaped. A berm shall be a minimum of three (3) feet high. 3) Fences: A fence shall be constructed of materials having a nominal thickness of one (1) inch. Wrought iron or chain link fencing will not be permitted for screening purposes. (See design guidelines for acceptable materials.) d. Mechanical equipment: Roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view with materials finished to match material and colors in the roof and building. In some cases screening from view from freeway, adjacent roadways or surrounding development may not be practical. Sec. 8119.2.2 - Landscaping - The following standards shall apply to all development except, however, single family detached subdivisions not having common areas shall be exempt. Landscaping, consisting of evergreen or deciduous trees, shrubs, or groundcover, shall be installed and permanently maintained subject to the following conditions and standards: Page - 4 - 2/94 a. Separation: Any landscaped area shall be separated from an adjacent vehicular area by a wall or concrete curb at least six (6) inches higher than the adjacent vehicular area. b. All areas to be commonly maintained, as determined by the City, shall be designated as separate lettered lots on subdivision maps. C. Water: Permanent automatic watering facilities with water sensors shall be provided for all land- scaped areas. This system may be augmented by drought- resistant vegetation. d. Maintenance: All landscaping shall be permanently maintained in a neat, clean and healthful condi- tion. e. Landscape Plan: Prior to the issuance of a build- ing permit, detailed landscape and irrigation plans prepared by a registered landscaped architect, shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. The plan shall provide for substantial screening and breakup of parking areas, as well as buffering the structural elevations. Failure to maintain all landscape materials and irrigation systems in a permanently healthy and functional manner shall constitute a violation of the city's zoning ordinance. Upon completion of the project and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the registered landscape architect shall submit a letter of certification to the city stating the landscape and irrigation system have been installed per the approved plans. All landscape and irrigation designs shall meet all current city standards and codes. The detailed landscape plans shall include the specific palette recommendations and require- ments for the area. All landscape and irrigation plans shall incorporate drought- tolerant plant material and water efficient irrigation systems. Sec. 8119.3 - SINGLE FAMILY - AREAS A, B and D Sec. 8119.3.1 - Purpose and Intent - These single family residential planning areas are intended to provide for the development and maintenance of medium density residential neighborhoods offering detached dwelling units. These regulations allow for a variety of residential uses, and community facilities and accessory uses which are complementary to and harmonize with such neighborhoods. Page - 5 - 2/94 It is the intent of these regulations to set standards which can be applied in response to individual community needs and to encourage innovative community design. This use category allows for a maximum density of 3.7 dwelling units per gross acre in Planning Area A and 3.0 dwelling units per gross acre in Planning Areas B and D. Sec. 8119 -3.2 - Permitted Uses a. Conventional subdivisions of detached single family residential dwellings (one dwelling per building site) b. Open space uses C. Public facilities d. Public utility buildings and structures e. Public or private parks Sec. 8119 -3.3 - Conditional Uses (subject to Conditional Use Permit) a. Communication, transmitting or relay facilities b. Churches, temples, and other places of worship C. Fire and police stations d. Any other use which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this category Sec. 8119 -3.4 - Accessory Uses and Structures a. Fences, walls and patios b. Garages C. Greenhouses (non - commercial) d. Private recreation facilities, including but not limited to passive parks, swimming pools accessory to a primary residential use, tennis courts, putt- ing greens, lakes, and trails e. Other accessory uses which are clearly incidental to permitted uses and for the exclusive use of residents of the site. Page - 6 - 2/91 Sec. 8119 -3.5 - Site Development Standards a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet maximum measured from the grade of the slab. b. Setbacks measured from property line: 1) Front: 20 feet 2) Side: a) Interior: 5 feet minimum. For lots over 70 feet in width; sum of side yards must equal 15 percent of lot width. For the second story of a dwelling with windows; 10 feet minimum. _ b) Exterior: Same as interior lots except reverse corner lots; 20 feet on street side. 3) Rear: 20 feet 4) Special: Area D - Perimeter housing to be built overlooking Spring Road shall be limited to one- story; except, two -story construction shall be permitted provided additional set- back from top of slope achieves the same roof profile as one -story with normal set- back. C. Minimum lot size: 6,000 square feet d. Minimum lot width: 65 feet at setback line in Area D. 55 feet at setback line in Areas A and B. e. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor- park Zoning Code. f. Animal Regulations: Same as required for R -1 and the City's Zoning Ordinance. Sec. 8119 -4 - SINGLE FAMILY - AREA C Sec. 8119 -4.1 - Purpose and Intent Area C residential planning area is intended to provide for the development and maintenance of higher density residential neighborhoods offering attached duplex, Pegs - 7 - 2/94 detached conventional units or zero lot line patio homes. These regulations allow for a variety of residential uses, and community facilities and accessory uses which are complementary to and harmonize with such neigh- borhoods. It is the intent of these regulations to set basic standards which can be applied in response to individual community needs and to encourage innovative community design. The use category allows for a maximum density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre. Sec. 8119 -4.2 - Permitted Use a. Conventional subdivibions, attached duplex and detached patio /zero lot line single family resi- dential dwellings (1 or 2 dwellings per building site) b. Open space uses C. Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) including zero - lot line homes and patio homes. d. Public facilities e. Public utility buildings and structures f. Public or private parks Sec. 8119 -4.3 - Conditional Uses (subject to Conditional Use Permit a. Communication, transmitting or relay facilities b. Churches, temples and other places of worship C. Fire and police stations d. Any other use which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this category. Sec. 8119 -4.4 - Accessory Uses and Structures a. Fences, walls and patios b. Garages C. Greenhouses (non - commercial) Page - 6 - 2/94 d. Private recreation facilities, including but not limited to passive parks, swimming pools accessory to a primary residential use, tennis courts, putt- ing greens, lakes, and trails. e. Other accessory uses which are clearly incidental to permitted uses and for the exclusive use of residents of the site. Sec. 8119 -4.5 - site Development Standards a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet maximum measured from the grade of the slab. b. Setbacks measured from property line: 1) Front: 20 feet 2) Side: a) Interior: 5 feet minimum. For lots over 70 feet in width; sum of side yards must equal 15 percent of lot width. For the second story of a dwelling with windows; 10 feet minimum. b) Exterior: Same as interior lots except reverse corner lots; 20 feet on street side. 3) Rear: 15 feet C. Minimum lot size: 4,000 square feet d. Minimum lot width: 40 feet at setback line e. Parking standard: Pursuant to Section 9.13.010, Required Off Street Parking, of the City of Moor- park Zoning Code. f. Animal Regulations: Same as for the R -1 residences in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Sec. 8119 -5 - SUB - REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL (SR /C1 Sec. 8119 -5.1 - Purpose and Intent The sub - regional retail /commercial overlay area is intended to provide for a shopping center featuring both retail and service commercial uses for the convenience of residents of the development as well as of the surrounding community. Page - 9 - 2/94 The physical effects of permitted and conditional uses in this planning area will be limited so that negative impacts, such as noise, odor, glare, visual impacts, and other such effects that could be harmful to life or nearby property, will not be generated. All permitted and conditional uses shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed building, and no outdoor storage of supplies, equipment or materials shall be allowed, except for company vehicles, garden centers and other similar uses and as otherwise noted herein. Sec. 8119 -5.2 - Permitted Uses a. Business /Commercial Services (eg., office supply stores, communication services, courier services, etc.) b. Civic Uses c. Commercial Entertainment Uses (eg., theater, meeting hall or other indoor spectator type uses) d. Commercial Recreation Uses (eg., miniature golf, bowling alley, commercial gym) e. Cultural Uses (eg., museums, art galleries) f. Educational Uses (eg., public or private schools, colleges or universities) g. Food Services, including fast -food and full - service facilities h. Minor Repair Service (e.g. T.V. /radio repair) i. Office Uses (e.g. accounting, barbershop) J. Personal Services (eg., architectural, doctors, lawyers, real estate or other professional uses) k. Photographic Reproduction and Graphic Service 1. Public Safety Uses M. Religious Uses /offices n. Retail Sales o. Any other use which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this land use category Page - 10 - 2/94 Sec. 8119 -5.3 - AccessoU uses and Structures a. Fences and walls b. Security and construction and storage offices, during construct +on d. Signs, per the City Zoning Ordinance and an ap- proved Master Sign Program (see page 18). e. Accessory structures or uses the Director of Com- munity Development finds to be consistent with, and subordinate to, a principal use on the same site. Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet (2 stories) measured from the grade of the slab. b. Setbacks measured from property line: 1) Front: 30 feet 2) Side: a) Adjacent to residential lot - 50 feet b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet c) Adjacent to alley - 5 feet d) None of the above - 0 feet 3) Rear: a) Adjacent to Residential lot - 50 feet b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet c) Adjacent to alley - 5 feet d) None of the above - 0 feet C. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor- park Zoning Code. d. Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent. Page - 11 - 2/91 Sec. 8119 -6 - BUSINESS PARR (BPI Sec. 8119 -6.1 - Pupose and Intent The business park designation =s intended to provide for the development of a wide -.ariety of office, light industrial /assembly,, research and development and service uses, - which will serve the City of Moorpark and the surrounding communities. In addition, this land use category allows a limited amount of business, commercial, and personal services that directly serve the users and employees of the business park. The business park is intended to provide a high quality business environment which will take advantage of convenient access to the Moorpark Freeway and New Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118/23). The physical effects of permitted and conditional uses in this Planning Area will be limited so that negative impacts, such as noise, odor, glare, visual impacts, and other such effects that could be harmful to life or nearby property, will not be generated. All permitted and conditional uses shall be conducted entirely within a completely enclosed building, and no outdoor storage of supplies, equipment or materials shall be allowed, except for company vehicles and as otherwise noted herein. Sec. 8119 -6.2 - Permitted Uses a. Business /Commercial Services (eg., office supply stores, communication services, courier services, etc.* b. Civic uses C. Clinical services d. Food services in conjunction with the principal use and not open to the public, ie. a cafeteria. e. Light industrial /assembly uses f. Office uses g. Personal services (eg., architectural, doctors, lawyers, real estate or other professional uses)* h. Research and development uses i. Service uses J. Warehousing and storage uses Page - 12 - 2/94 k. Wholesaling 1. Any other use which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this land use category. * Business, commercial and personal service uses combined shall be limited to a total of 50 percent of the gross floor area of structures in the business park. Sec. 8119 -6.3 - Conditional Uses (subject to a Conditional Use Permit) a. Commercial recreation uses b. Educational uses C. Food services not in conjunction with the principal use. d. Minor automotive service e. Public utilities f. Religious uses Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet measured from the grade of the slab, however, if the site is to be utilized by one single user the height limit shall not exceed 50 feet measured from the grade of the slab. b. Setbacks measured from the property line: 1) Front: 20 percent of lot width or depth with a minimum of 30 feet. 2) Side: a) Interior: 15 percent of lot width or depth with a minimum of 30 feet b) Exterior: 10 percent of lot width or depth with a minimum of 30 feet 3) Rear: 15 percent of lot width or depth with a minimum of 10 feet C. Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet d. Minimum lot width: None specified Page - 13 - 2/94 e. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor- park Zoning Code. f. Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent g. All other applicable City codes /standards apply. Sec. 8119 -7 - OPEN SPACE (OS) Sec. 8119 -7.1 -Purpose and Intent The open space area is intended to provide for the preservation of natural physical and visual resources in recognition of the environmental and aesthetic value of the area with either public or private ownership. Sec 8119 -7.2 - Permitted Uses (subject to Site Plan Review) a. Open space b. Agricultural uses (subject to Conditional Use Permit approval) C. Pedestrian trails d. Nature preservation and study areas e. Infrastructure service facilities f. Structures and other uses accessory to permitted uses g. Utility easements h. Any other use which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this land use category. Sec. 8119 -7.3 - Site Development Standards Development standards for those uses permitted shall be established by the site plan review process. When uses proposed in the Open Space land use classification are permitted in other land use classifications of the Specific Plan, the development standards in those other applicable classifications shall apply. Sec. 8119 -8 - INSTITUTIONAL U Page - 14 - 2/94 Sec. 8119 -8.1 - Purpose and Intent The institutional area is intended to provide for development and maintenance of institutional uses such as a library, museum or similar uses. The physical effects of such uses will be limited so that negative impact.; such as; noise, odor, glare, visual impacts and other such effects that could be harmful to life or nearby property will not be generated. Sec. 8119 -8.2 - Permitted Uses Includes public facility uses: government building; museum; library; fire station; non profit organization uses; church; community service center; private or public school; day care facility; health services and hospital; art gallery or- similar uses which the Director of Community Development finds consistent with the purpose and intent of this land use. Sec. 8119 -8.3 - Accessory Uses and Structures a. Fences and Walls b. Security and construction and storage offices, during construction C. Signs, per City Zoning Ordinance and the approved Master Sign Program. d. Accessory structures or uses the Director of Com- munity Development finds to be consistent with, and subordinate to, a principal use on the same site. Sec. 8119 -8.4 - Site Development Standards a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet (2 stories) measured from the grade of the slab. b. Setbacks measured from property line: 1) Front: 30 feet 2) Side: a) Adjacent to residential lot - 50 feet b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet C. Adjacent to alley - 5 feet d. None of the above - 0 feet Page - 15 - 2/94 3) Rear: a) Adjacent to residential lot - 50 feet b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet c) Adjacent to alley - 5 feet d) None of the above - 0 feet 4) Parking Standards: Pursuant to the City of Moorpark Zoning Code. 5) Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent Sec. 8119 -9 - SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Sec. 8119 -9.1 - Review Procedures The Carlsberg Specific Plan shall be implemented through the Tentative Map, and Planned Development Review Process. a. Master Tentative Tract Maps - Master Tentative Map(s) or parcel map(s), as applicable, shall be filed to subdivide according to each planning area (the "Lot(s) ") within the specific plan area. Submittal and review requirements shall be as specified in the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance and other City ordinances resolutions, policies and regulations. Recorded phased final maps of each Lot within the Master Tentative Tract Maps(s) shall be permitted. Additional tentative tract subdivision maps of the Lots are to be filed subsequent to or concurrent with the Master Tentative Tract Maps. .b. Residential Planned Development Review (RPD) - Residential Planned Development Permit approval shall be required for all residential projects within the Carlsberg Specific Plan, in accordance with City's Zoning Code. C. Commercial Planned Development Review (CPD) - Commercial Planned Development Permit approval shall be required for all commercial projects within the Carlsberg Specific Plan in accordance with the City's Zoning Code. d. Industrial Planned Development Review (IPD) - Page - 16 - 2/94 Industrial Planned Development Permit approval shall be required for all industrial projects within the Carlsberg Specific Plan in accordance with the City's Zoning Code. Sec. 8119 -9.2 - Administrative (_ "Minor ") Modifications to the Specific Plan, Tentative Maps or Development Permits Certain modifications to the specific plan text or tract maps are specifically deemed not to require formal amendments (ie., through public hearing) to the specific plan as originally approved. These are modifications which will not materially affect the overall purpose and intent of the specific plan. Minor variations to development areas will occur through implementation of the specific plan. The following transfer program will serve both the public and the planned development. It will: Minimize City staff, Commission and Council time spent on minor adjustments and technical matters. Set criteria /findings that demonstrate consistency with specific plan goals and objectives. Assure that levels of development throughout the life of the specific plan are consistent with adequacy and provisions of infrastructure and services. Transfer of dwelling units between development areas may be allowed as long as the total number of dwelling units approved (552) is not exceeded. Transfer of acreage between development areas shall be allowed as long as combined developed acreage of the transferring area and the receiving area is not exceeded by more than five percent for each area. The transfer shall be approved based on the following findings: Total dwelling units and development area as approved in the specific plan is not exceeded. Demands on parks, schools and community facilities are not significantly affected. Demands on public improvements and infrastructure are not exceeded. Grading and landform alteration do not significantly differ from that approved by the Page - 17 - 2/94 specific plan. The overall design and visual quality of the planned community are not significantly affected. Planning Area Boundaries adjustments will be allowed provided that: Adjustments in the planning area boundaries, which do not exceed a cumulative total of ten percent of the original size in acres, resulting from final road alignments, geotechnical or engineering refinements to the site plan, tentative and /or final tract maps shall not require an amendment of the specific plan where such adjustments are consistent with the intent of the City General Plan and the specific plan. Boundaries not dimensioned on the Land Use Plan shall be established through the final subdivision map process and shall be generally consistent with the exhibits within the specific plan. Any proposed change that is not extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in land use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on the surrounding properties, and would not change any findings contained in the environmental document prepared for the permit, shall be deemed a minor modification and be acted upon by the Director of Community Development in accordance with applicable procedures for minor modifications. Sec. 8119 -9.3 - General Provisions - ( "Major ") Modifications to the Specific Plan, Tract Maps and Development Permits All amendments shall be consistent with the requirements of California Government Code Sections 65500 et seq. and shall be subject to public notice and other requirements of the Government Code. Any proposed modification not determined to be addressed by Section 8119 -9.2 above and is considered to be a substantial change in land use relative to the specific plan, tract map or permit, and /or would alter the findings contained in the environmental document prepared for the specific plan, tract map or permit, shall be deemed a major modification and /or an amendment and shall be acted upon by the decision - making authority which approved the specific plan, tract map or permit. Page - 18 - 1/91 Section 5. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the passage and adoption. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of Sept,. 1994 ATTEST: Paul W. Lawrason, J Mayor Page - 19 - 2194 MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Ordinance No. i95 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 21st day of Senremh r , 1994, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, WOZNIAK, AND MAYOR LAWRASON NOES: COUNCILMEMBER HUNTER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City, this 23rd day of September 1994. " e-1 Lillian E. Hare City Clerk 1 /, . I , l r� PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tom Councdmember Counciknember Conc*nember Pnnf*d on Raayc" r n.. 17.30.010 Chapter 17.30 LIGHTING REGULATIONS Sections: 17.30.010 Purpose and intent. 1730.020 Definitions. 1730.030 Applicability. 1730.040 General requirements. 1730.050 Prohibited lighting. 1730.060 Plans required. 17.30.070 Design guidelines. 1730.050 CertitxationAesting. 17.30.090 Exemptions. 1730.100 Palatbn -- Penalties. 1730.110 Nonconforming systems. 1730.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide regulation of lighting systems constructed on properties within the various zones in the city. The city recognizes that lighting has both a practical and aesthetic value and is an integral portion of any devel- opment. The city also recognizes that improperly installed lighting, illegal lighting, or improperly maintained fighting, creates impacts upon astronomical resources within the community and creates conflicts and nuisance impacts upon abutting properties and is wasteful of energy resources by causing energy to be expended without producing additional useful light (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.020 Definitions. Words and terms as used in this chapter shall have the meanings set forth in this section. Words or terms not defined herein shall have the generally accepted meaning as defined elsewhere within this title. "Candlepower" means the total light output expressed in candelas. "Drop down lens" means a light directing diffuser or lens which is shaped so -that it lays or falls below the horizontal plane of the bottom of the fixture, thus resulting in direct viewing of the lens from above the horizontal plane. "Glare" means the effect produced by lighting sufficient to cause annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual perfor- mance and visibility. For the purposes of this chapter, glare occurs when the luminaire (or associated lens) of a light fixture is directly viewable from a location off the property that it serves. "Human scale" means the proportional relationship of a particular building, structure, or streetscape element to human form and function. (Moorpark 1 -01) " Lmminaire or luminary" means the light producing element of a light fixture. Examples are bulbs and tubes. Direct viewing of luminaries of greater than one thousand (1,000) lumens per fixture is undesirable. Secondary luminaire. For the purpose of this chapter a diffusing lens between the bulb and the viewer is not considered an obstruction to the direct view of a single luminaire and is considered a "secondary luminaire." Spillover. In practical terms, a close relative of glare. "Spillover" occurs when the illumination intensity outside the property boundaries exceeds one (1) foot - candle. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.030 Applicability. The regulations contained within this chapter shall apply to all residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional zoned lands and projects, except additions or remodels of single - family homes within the city. These regulations shall apply to all specific plan areas and are intended to augment lighting standards and regulations contained within any adopted specific plan. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.040 General requirements. A. Lighting permitted shall be limited to those levels necessary to provide safety and security to the site. B. Use of low intensity lighting for aesthetic purposes in order to enhance or accent building features, public art, or landscape architectural features of a project is encour- aged. Such lighting shall not spill over onto, or extend beyond the property -line or into adjacent public right -of- way. C. All lighting systems shall meet adopted uniform codes and standards of the city. D. All lighting system components shall be kept in good repair and service. Periodic cleaning, painting and servicing of supports, globes, fixtures and foundations is required. Poor maintenance shall be considered a public nuisance. E. All lighting components shall be decorative and shall be compatible with the architectural style of the build- ings within the project location. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.050 Prohibited lighting. The following types of lighting shall be prohibited within the city: A. Any outdoor lighting system erected, installed, modified or reconstructed without proper plans and permit approvals; B. Flashing, alternating or blinking lights, other than traffic or hazard lights or those permitted under the sign regulations contained in Chapter 17.40; 346 ATTAC H DUI ENT_& C. Low pressure sodium (LPS) lights, except when it has been determined by the director of community development that LPS use in proximity to a light sensitive land use, such as an observatory, is appropriate to minimize light impacts on the adjacent use which would otherwise limit the function of the light sensitive land use; D. High intensity mercury vapor security lights (with fixture not properly implemented to shield direct viewing of the luminaire or the light shaping lens/diffuser from off the property) in other than rural residential or agricultur- al areas; E. Any luminaire that is viewed directly with no intervening lens or shielding element, other than bare bulbs, tube lighting, or approved neon lighting; F. Drop down lens. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.060 Plans required. All commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential projects, except additions, approved after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall have the lighting system and its components, to be incorporated within that project, approved by the city's lighting engineer prior to issuance of building permits for that project. Projects approved prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this chapter to the extent feasible, consistent with Section 17.30.110. Each lighting plan shall incorporate electrical plans and structural plans which detail the provision of lighting systems for exteriors of all buildings, parking lots, loading areas, walkways, public use areas, public art displays, fountains, or landscape areas. Lighting plans shall be prepared, signed and certified by a civil or electrical engineer licensed and/or registered within the state of California to prepare and certify lighting system designs/plans. Lighting plans shall, as a minimum, include and exhibit the following: A. Style, size, height and location of any poles used to support lighting fixtures or electroliers; B. Size, height and location of any foundation systems upon which light poles may be erected; C. Style, type, location and quantity of fixtures and/ or electroliers, whether pole mounted, bollard mounted or building mounted; D. Number and wattage of luminaries/bulbs/electtvliem light color temperature (equivalent Kelvin blackbody temperature) and/or the radiometric emission spectrum giving relative intensity vs. wavelength over the range of 400 — 700 manometers; E. Shields, cut-off mechanisms, or diffusers used with each fixture; 17.30.050 F. Construction structural and mounting details for all installations; G. All exterior lighting plans shall be photo-metric consisting of a point by point foot - candle layout based upon a ten (10) foot grid center and extended to twenty (20) feet beyond the property line; H. Lighting plans shall be prepared to scale, and shall be accompanied by dimensioned detail sheets, materials catalogues, and specifications to aid in the identification and evaluation of proposed lighting system components. The application for such lighting plans should be made on the form provided by the department of community development. A fee, as established by city council resolu- tion, is required to accompany each application for a lighting plan. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.070 Design guidelines. A. General Guidelines. 1. All lighting shall be stationary and directed away from all adjacent properties and streets/rights -of -ways. 2. Lighting systems shall be energy efficient. 3. Lights shall be shielded or recessed to direct glare and reflections within the boundaries of the property. 4. Lighting shall be consistent among fixtures used throughout the project so that single fixtures or small grasps of fixtures shall not be of unusually high intensity or brightness such that hot spots are created. 5. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity and height to the use to be served. 6. All walkway lighting, public space lighting, patio area lighting shall be kept to human scale. Bollard style lighting is preferred. 7. Security lighting shall be provided at all entrances and exits to buildings. 8. All lighting fixtures shall incorporate full cutoff features such that the luminaire is not visible and that spillover or direct light emissions do not extend beyond the property line or into adjacent public right -of -way. 9. Concrete pedestals, bases or foundations intended for the mounting of poles shall be restricted in height and bulk to that necessary to provide adequate, safe anchorage for poles and fixtures, but shall in no case exceed the heights specified in Section 17.30.070D. All concrete pedestals shall be painted or stucco coated to be compatible with the project architectural elevations, or to blend with the landscape areas in which they are constructed. 10. Unshielded pack lighting fixtures and area wide flood lighting are prohibited. B. Lighting pole height: 1. Residential: fourteen (14) feet; 2. Commercial: twenty (20) feet; 3. Industrial: twenty-five (25) feet; 346-1 (Moorpuk 1-01) 17.30.070 4. Institutional: twenty (20) feet. C. Lighting Values: L Exterior parking areas: Seven (7) foot - candles maximum, One (1) foot - candle minimum; 2. Interior parking areas: Ten (10) foot - candles minimum; 3. Blue metal halide and high pressure sodium electroliers: four hundred (400) watt maximum; 4. Fluorescent lighting units: one hundred (100) watts per light fixture. Such units shall be shielded so that tubes or lenses are not viewable outside the intended illuminated area. D. Pedestals Pedestals used to provide ground mounting foundations for lighting poles and fixtures shall not exceed six (6) inches in height when placed adjacent to sidewalks, within planters, or within parking lots. Light fixtures when placed in a hardscape area shall be mounted flush with the surrounding paving or hardscape. E. Pole and pedestal clearances: 1. Curb face: three (3) feet; 2. Handicap parking space or ramp: five (5) feet; 3. Parking space: side — two (2) feet, head — three (3) feet; 4. Trash enclosure: three (3) feet from any vehicle approach; 5. Drive aisles: three (3) feet; 6. Edge of sidewalk: two (2) feet - F. Minimum fixture vertical clearance: 1. Over driveways/aisles: fourteen (14) feet; 2. Over walkways: eight (8) feet. G. Shielding/Shrouds. All lighting fixtures shall be designed and installed such that no light will be emitted above the horizontal plane. Integral cut-off devices or shields and/or the addition of external shrouds of compatible architectural design to the buildings shall be used to limit stray light. H. Automatic Shutoff. All lighting systems shall be designed to include an automatic shutoff control with manual override capability such that only a minimum number of fixtures remain on after the closing time of the facility which they serve. It is the intent of this subsection that significant reductions in nighttime light glow occur. Reductions shall not be less than seventy -five percent (75 %) of the designed lighting output and fifty percent (50 %) of the energy load of the system after the hour of ten (10:00) p.m., except for approved entertainment venues, businesses for which conditions of approval permit operation beyond ten (10:00) p.m. and twenty-four (24) hour business- es, or unless otherwise approved by the director of commu- nity development, upon recommendation of the city's (momput 1-01) 346-2 lighting engineer that a significant amount of energy will not be saved or the existing level of light is needed for safety or security around the premises. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.080 Certification/testing. Each fighting plan shall meet the standarcls of this chapter and title, as well as those structural and electrical codes adopted by the city which may apply. The applicant's engineer shall prepare and certify that the plan has been prepared in accordance with this chapter and any design materials furnished by the city's lighting engineer. The city's lighting engineer shall review and approve the plans and certify to their compliance with this chapter and any applicable design guidelines. Tice city's lighting engineer shall sign all zoning clearances necessary to issue building permits for the implementation of the lighting plans. Prior to final inspection, or where applicable, issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the city lighting engineer shall cause to be performed a photometric field inspection of the approved lighting system for the project. The inspec- tion shall verify the proper construction and installation of materials within the approved plan, determine the actual light patterns and values through light meter testing and observation, and determine the extent of any errant lighting. Deviations and/or violations shall be corrected prior to the final clearance for the project. (Ord. 266 12 (part), 1999) 1730.090 Exemptions. The criteria of this chapter shall not apply to any of the following: A. One (1) incandescent bulb of one hundred (100) watts or less used in low density residential or rural lighting areas, provided such fixture is shielded so as not to emit light above the horizontal plane or beyond the property line; B. Athletic field lights within a public park. recreation or school campus established pursuant to special plans meeting recognized standards for such facilities constructed in accordance with a photometric plan for these facilities. Nonhorizontal fixtures are discouraged; C. Navigation beacons, aircraft warning lighting upon towers or similar structures, hazard markers, railroad signals and crossing warning devices; D. Security lighting for prison, jail facilities, medical facilities or special health care facilities; E. Traffic control devices; F. Seasonal lighting displays used in conjunction with special holidays or religious celebrations so long as the glare is not sufficient to pose safety hazards to pedestrians and motorists, or cause sufficient attraction to result in creation of a nuisance or hazard to vehicular traffic; G. Temporary sale or special event lighting as permitted through the issuance of appropriate permits by the city; H. Repair or replacement of individual lighting fixtures existing prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, provided that the fixture and/or the luminaire repaired or replaced does not exceed the intensity of the original lighting fixture and further provided that the repair or replacement is subject to any requited permits; I. Safety or security lighting within single - family residential neighborhoods recommended by police or special security inspections as part of a neighborhood watch program provided such lighting shall not create a nuisance to abutting properties as a result of spillover. To the extent that the prescribed lighting is not diminished in effective- ness, all such lighting shall incorporate motion detectors, photocells or similar devices to activate the special light fixtures, but shall be provided with a manual switching device to override the fixture when necessary. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 17.30.100 Violation — Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person to install, replace, reconstruct or intensify any lighting system, for which a permit is required, upon any commercial, industrial. institu- tional or residential property within the city not in compli- ance with the provisions of this chapter. Any person who violates any provision of, or fails to comply with any requirement of this chapter is guilty of an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of this code. It shall be the responsibility of each occupant, property owner, home owners' association, tenant association, or property management association having jurisdiction over property to ensure compliance with the intent and provisions of this chapter. Covenants and conditions for any property association shall contain provisions for the design. review, approval and continued maintenance of lighting systems within the boundaries of such association. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 1730.110 Nonconforming systems. Lighting systems, for which valid permits have been issued. existing upon properties within any zone prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall be considered legally nonconforming. As such, repair, maintenance, and replacement with like fixtures of these lighting systems shall be permitted, unless otherwise provid- ed for within this chapter. Replacement, repair or reconstruction of twenty-five percent (25 %) or more of the fixtures within an existing 17.30.090 legal nonconforming lighting system, as determined by the director of community development, shall require that the system be brought into conformity with the provisions of this chapter. Lighting systems within single - family projects found to create a nuisance to abutting residences or upon the public right -of -way, shall be corrected in such a manner as to remove the nuisance. Alterations to existing legal nonconforming lighting systems shall not be permitted except for those which result in a lighting system for the property which is more conform- ing, with these provisions or which reduce the level of nonconformity. Whenever a project site is the subject of a major modifi- cation to the approved development plan as defined by this code, the major modification application shall incorpo- rate a revised lighting system plan in order to bring the property into conformance with this chapter. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999) 346 -3 (Mooapak 1 -01) 'ZECEnD APR - 2 2092 'nYOFMOORBAM - ----- ----------- .............. b.e o he V1 .. IL --- u - --------- ... ......... ........... ----- ------ vo-o"lu . 6. ----------------- . ............. ........ ........ he b. %A %It m ---- 1-4--to . -- w ... 1i --- ---- ---- - .. IV ... ---------- - .. ...... -i5 VI 16. S. 1b, IL, v. N, . .. ............. .................. L- - - - - - - - - - Cos .. a �, �; --I-.-- --- --------------- 4 12 4022 SF r: 04 r4 :yj !32 I T PL-2 PL;g I MOM w0m.-Miam A p4K�%mww GARDEN CENTER A 8M SF 613 ,4N Est GTARGET 127000 SF STOCKROOM 01CLUDM STOl 16000 SF iV IF -1-0-ml moll W1 Z.1� V - Li B ci RETAIL RETAIL C2 30000 SF 23814 SF RETAIL 1678 SF. 8450 SF 25492 SF -L-1-3 'L-' 11e1 -1 11, f Pp I hl I ? .Zku } , H is rm*olrz�vl %, V, ). V, %, I.- %. Of V. 12 •s$ *-, %. %-, *- %. %, r& %. I., V, to JI'l I'd.] 11u la [100hl QJ1 54 TW (-iU',bl r,,111,1 l 1.61 rbil bd 13,1 I'doll fUl M 11.1 11.1 *_j U 1 $j 11A 1161 U ka 11.1 1,41 ul W 11 LOT 4 BUSINESS PARK V, 1,zj!:!,L!�j ---------- A SITE PLAN"ORM KAA BM ~MW WIN A u PM&OMY m "v" WA%W OF Is corl ATTACHMENT AW SUBJECT 70 11>I�NCE Dent Wo• ZELMAN RETAIL A I. PARTNERS INC 515 SWJ90 iF& LOS ANMA C4110ft W THB40F 0 &13-M -AIL 0 SF U-1 CL- Lu E KOHL'S 2F-SBL-SP 87771 SF cx-- +7214 SF 94984 SF cr— CL- %3i 4-131 uh ho 1,0 p Isiom D2 SHOPS STOCKROOM 5830 SF 632 -, 7AW SF W • to vv -Ci 'k. 1 3�3' Ail SF Y. awing Ma INNE &W* Drm By R UEW r rn ft*v &M ft ft Rem m man" r-sff v ��bb No. SCALE: T- SCr-0' 9820tV 'A PHOTOMETRIC INN 0 5r75- 14poolt 25011 IF* INITIAL ------------- - ------ ------------ - ----- ---------- ------------ O Oft :: L Lso but CA -504 ------------ - ---------- -- --- ---- - -- ---- " L., "Womm VENUE - I LY I An MWS"CA ow 1 4 -4 V ------ . - so : 2,000 swa -------- 22 ............ : : ------ ------------------------------------------- - W 2•A 21000 J, I t'l - ----- - 7 U.n A."..3 Be .......... - --------------- ------- ----------------- --- . -70 - ................. : , .. ............................. - 2E PW-a.77 PL-, 4 Q& .0000 1 �K -BaCK 13 Fo AAL Mj-PW-V5-175W — —175 -3 PL -1 -v7 W Oft21 -40 Dw a.Q -owo S.GLE - ----- ----------- .............. b.e o he V1 .. IL --- u - --------- ... ......... ........... ----- ------ vo-o"lu . 6. ----------------- . ............. ........ ........ he b. %A %It m ---- 1-4--to . -- w ... 1i --- ---- ---- - .. IV ... ---------- - .. ...... -i5 VI 16. S. 1b, IL, v. N, . .. ............. .................. L- - - - - - - - - - Cos .. a �, �; --I-.-- --- --------------- 4 12 4022 SF r: 04 r4 :yj !32 I T PL-2 PL;g I MOM w0m.-Miam A p4K�%mww GARDEN CENTER A 8M SF 613 ,4N Est GTARGET 127000 SF STOCKROOM 01CLUDM STOl 16000 SF iV IF -1-0-ml moll W1 Z.1� V - Li B ci RETAIL RETAIL C2 30000 SF 23814 SF RETAIL 1678 SF. 8450 SF 25492 SF -L-1-3 'L-' 11e1 -1 11, f Pp I hl I ? .Zku } , H is rm*olrz�vl %, V, ). V, %, I.- %. Of V. 12 •s$ *-, %. %-, *- %. %, r& %. I., V, to JI'l I'd.] 11u la [100hl QJ1 54 TW (-iU',bl r,,111,1 l 1.61 rbil bd 13,1 I'doll fUl M 11.1 11.1 *_j U 1 $j 11A 1161 U ka 11.1 1,41 ul W 11 LOT 4 BUSINESS PARK V, 1,zj!:!,L!�j ---------- A SITE PLAN"ORM KAA BM ~MW WIN A u PM&OMY m "v" WA%W OF Is corl ATTACHMENT AW SUBJECT 70 11>I�NCE Dent Wo• ZELMAN RETAIL A I. PARTNERS INC 515 SWJ90 iF& LOS ANMA C4110ft W THB40F 0 &13-M -AIL 0 SF U-1 CL- Lu E KOHL'S 2F-SBL-SP 87771 SF cx-- +7214 SF 94984 SF cr— CL- %3i 4-131 uh ho 1,0 p Isiom D2 SHOPS STOCKROOM 5830 SF 632 -, 7AW SF W • to vv -Ci 'k. 1 3�3' Ail SF Y. awing Ma INNE &W* Drm By R UEW r rn ft*v &M ft ft Rem m man" r-sff v ��bb No. SCALE: T- SCr-0' 9820tV 'A PHOTOMETRIC INN 0 5r75- 14poolt 25011 IF* INITIAL ------------- - ------ ------------ - ----- ---------- ------------ O Oft :: L Lso but CA ------------ - ---------- -- --- ---- - -- ---- " "Womm VENUE - MWS"CA NGELES - -4 V ------ . - SEw L ---------- ------- - - -------- ............ : : ------ ------------------------------------------- - --- ----------------------------- - ----------- ............... . - : ------ - - ----- - .......... - --------------- ------- ----------------- --- . ................. : , .. ............................. - --- ----- ------------- b.e o he V1 .. IL --- u - --------- ... ......... ........... ----- ------ vo-o"lu . 6. ----------------- . ............. ........ ........ he b. %A %It m ---- 1-4--to . -- w ... 1i --- ---- ---- - .. IV ... ---------- - .. ...... -i5 VI 16. S. 1b, IL, v. N, . .. ............. .................. L- - - - - - - - - - Cos .. a �, �; --I-.-- --- --------------- 4 12 4022 SF r: 04 r4 :yj !32 I T PL-2 PL;g I MOM w0m.-Miam A p4K�%mww GARDEN CENTER A 8M SF 613 ,4N Est GTARGET 127000 SF STOCKROOM 01CLUDM STOl 16000 SF iV IF -1-0-ml moll W1 Z.1� V - Li B ci RETAIL RETAIL C2 30000 SF 23814 SF RETAIL 1678 SF. 8450 SF 25492 SF -L-1-3 'L-' 11e1 -1 11, f Pp I hl I ? .Zku } , H is rm*olrz�vl %, V, ). V, %, I.- %. Of V. 12 •s$ *-, %. %-, *- %. %, r& %. I., V, to JI'l I'd.] 11u la [100hl QJ1 54 TW (-iU',bl r,,111,1 l 1.61 rbil bd 13,1 I'doll fUl M 11.1 11.1 *_j U 1 $j 11A 1161 U ka 11.1 1,41 ul W 11 LOT 4 BUSINESS PARK V, 1,zj!:!,L!�j ---------- A SITE PLAN"ORM KAA BM ~MW WIN A u PM&OMY m "v" WA%W OF Is corl ATTACHMENT AW SUBJECT 70 11>I�NCE Dent Wo• ZELMAN RETAIL A I. PARTNERS INC 515 SWJ90 iF& LOS ANMA C4110ft W THB40F 0 &13-M -AIL 0 SF U-1 CL- Lu E KOHL'S 2F-SBL-SP 87771 SF cx-- +7214 SF 94984 SF cr— CL- %3i 4-131 uh ho 1,0 p Isiom D2 SHOPS STOCKROOM 5830 SF 632 -, 7AW SF W • to vv -Ci 'k. 1 3�3' Ail SF Y. awing Ma INNE &W* Drm By R UEW r rn ft*v &M ft ft Rem m man" r-sff v ��bb No. SCALE: T- SCr-0' 9820tV 'A PHOTOMETRIC INN 0 5r75- 14poolt 25011 IF* INITIAL .. a �, �; --I-.-- --- --------------- 4 12 4022 SF r: 04 r4 :yj !32 I T PL-2 PL;g I MOM w0m.-Miam A p4K�%mww GARDEN CENTER A 8M SF 613 ,4N Est GTARGET 127000 SF STOCKROOM 01CLUDM STOl 16000 SF iV IF -1-0-ml moll W1 Z.1� V - Li B ci RETAIL RETAIL C2 30000 SF 23814 SF RETAIL 1678 SF. 8450 SF 25492 SF -L-1-3 'L-' 11e1 -1 11, f Pp I hl I ? .Zku } , H is rm*olrz�vl %, V, ). V, %, I.- %. Of V. 12 •s$ *-, %. %-, *- %. %, r& %. I., V, to JI'l I'd.] 11u la [100hl QJ1 54 TW (-iU',bl r,,111,1 l 1.61 rbil bd 13,1 I'doll fUl M 11.1 11.1 *_j U 1 $j 11A 1161 U ka 11.1 1,41 ul W 11 LOT 4 BUSINESS PARK V, 1,zj!:!,L!�j ---------- A SITE PLAN"ORM KAA BM ~MW WIN A u PM&OMY m "v" WA%W OF Is corl ATTACHMENT AW SUBJECT 70 11>I�NCE Dent Wo• ZELMAN RETAIL A I. PARTNERS INC 515 SWJ90 iF& LOS ANMA C4110ft W THB40F 0 &13-M -AIL 0 SF U-1 CL- Lu E KOHL'S 2F-SBL-SP 87771 SF cx-- +7214 SF 94984 SF cr— CL- %3i 4-131 uh ho 1,0 p Isiom D2 SHOPS STOCKROOM 5830 SF 632 -, 7AW SF W • to vv -Ci 'k. 1 3�3' Ail SF Y. awing Ma INNE &W* Drm By R UEW r rn ft*v &M ft ft Rem m man" r-sff v ��bb No. SCALE: T- SCr-0' 9820tV 'A PHOTOMETRIC INN 0 5r75- 14poolt 25011 IF* INITIAL to vv -Ci 'k. 1 3�3' Ail SF Y. awing Ma INNE &W* Drm By R UEW r rn ft*v &M ft ft Rem m man" r-sff v ��bb No. SCALE: T- SCr-0' 9820tV 'A PHOTOMETRIC INN 0 5r75- 14poolt 25011 IF* INITIAL RECEIVED oo - 2 2002 rM OF MOMARK 1 � #d ,. b7 SCELES AVVSUE NEw LOS '. .... ....... -- -------- . . ....... .............. ----------- ............... ........... ...... - ------ - - ---------- - . ................ ---------------- ----------------- --------- --- -------- ---- -opefto cmew Oft IMS"CA ftwdOlm ft"I"ch ac --------------------- --- ----------- Clad kft ---- 3— Z_u ... 4wr — •1 .'- V. 'b,, 'b. bL' s 1 1 1,' "G./ 13 4 .......... ... ---------------- ............. ---------- 1-11 --- --- It .2- . ........ V, i7 is ------------- - - - - 11I VI ILI %.1 112 j 2 1, % .. . . . . ... ZELMAN —Trn—_iTT7. RETAIL 1 2 1'. 'k. %.I r\ 01 ♦ T. 8= SF 127000 SF STOCKROOM 04CUX" STOCKROOM) ego 16000 SF N. 1r .3 63 V. •S.2 1 Soo 1 40000 1 072 S.•GL 0 yienmum .1.0 PI- -;u -2 w 29 P"2- 2 2 071 &,xw-Wk 49 'V_�S _ j! 115 71700 72 Raba -S.20 h -f -v3 Ml - vI -IOOw 400 40000 072 Y,OLE5 22 7 w -0 ML Y7 -V7- In 1 10 1 4950 1 0 72 1 SmaE - 26 SCELES AVVSUE NEw LOS '. .... ....... -- -------- . . ....... .............. ----------- ............... ........... ...... - ------ - - ---------- - . ................ ---------------- ----------------- --------- --- -------- ---- -opefto cmew Oft IMS"CA ftwdOlm ft"I"ch ac --------------------- --- ----------- Clad kft ---- 3— Z_u ... 4wr — •1 .'- V. 'b,, 'b. bL' s 1 1 1,' "G./ 13 4 .......... ... ---------------- ............. ---------- 1-11 --- --- It .2- . ........ V, i7 is ------------- - - - - 11I VI ILI %.1 112 j 2 1, % .. . . . . ... ZELMAN —Trn—_iTT7. RETAIL 1 2 1'. 'k. %.I r\ 01 ♦ T. V. --- --------------- 4 % 4= $4 Sa . 5. }. u L 4 L 1• - p, 2 '.1 7;- -q- M. 2. 1 1. $1 GARDEN CENTER A 692 GTARGET 8= SF 127000 SF STOCKROOM 04CUX" STOCKROOM) ego 16000 SF N. 1r V. V. --- --------------- 4 % 4= $4 Sa . 5. }. u L 4 L 1• - p, 2 '.1 7;- -q- M. 2. 1 1. $1 GARDEN CENTER A 692 GTARGET 8= SF 127000 SF STOCKROOM 04CUX" STOCKROOM) ego 16000 SF --------------- M ------ PL- I PAR I NERS ING SIUM 20 MEft F r ws omm Maw sm Al m F ooRESTAURANT 3 8381 SF RETAIL I I J. , 3 !. s , 30800 SF 2j =s. W. I Lu 11.1 qF %0 -4 -A E 2 cr- . . . KOHL'S I �Tl F K-2 87771 SF SP +7214 SF I cr— =,7 6A ccC) Jid 94984 SF Q_ cr_ < cx_ O =E =E L B cl wY RETAIL pmWom RETAIL C2 30OW SF 23814 SF RETAIL D2 STOCKROOM +1678 SF. 8450 SF _. W�l SHOPS 532 25492 SF am IL t sm At N. S KS PL- 2 rTyl mf-n SF 1 Ufa kk w ham DO Ol t i� PL-1-3 FL- I-! a Wok IL COI Da" NLys SPA PIP 7TTT7FM I FrM1111111H111111111 H11111 11 111IJ11JI 1 T, r tl, 1111 t 3Vr r W, I' r, r W I -rf T 11 1 VJ I • 1166 k I Fle NM oloww" LOT 4 BUSINESS PARK sc* T. 5F r I 1"• 1 1" 11 fV1 11', IT, rfLr-," I I'l, I M I 'i'l IT I III I ---------- - -- ......... C, ',ALE 'r- 50'-0' 982 I TM KM M8 OM MWMW+WTH A PMAW"y ffm "VV TEWJW OF 6 CONCE"Uft ATTACHMENT? PHOTOMETRIC 0 A SITE PLAN.. U... TO CHANX W 75' 1W i 25a 1° 12 FEu ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING (or equal) Promenade Series I Cr 1017 mounting height Bronze Anodized fd*A Typical Pedestrian Light Fixture ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING (or equal) Promenade Seri k2 -V MOUNTING HEIGHT t Bwze Anodized finish Typical Parking Lot Light Fixture Misc. Details —T ar . �p�b leMie{'p09 MwtN0 �nj Wall Mounting Option Project Entry Monument Typical Trash Enclosure ATTACHMENT-q nr..drrran ouo r a. LnIMAM ho" Care Lie au Cbt w ZELMAN RETAIL PARTNERS, INC. 515 sfIGLE 0 SMT moo Los Afl(* a CALiO" 9w tam = &w= 11J C W r Y cc V { < t7C i C> cc O C) RBVISkw rr —min iii—_ �f3YM114 Ifft Iaw Oak 01.+0.02 am" of li Nate Dam M K Inced Do" Nine 8aiiss %time AhN WA 12 7 98201.11 Details - Sites NNW � 4 �y 46 AIP 0 R .......... � �. 1 i OPTICAL SYSTEM t CONSTRUCTION .....................6 /7 OPTIONS ...... ............................8 /9 ELEVATED SCALE ................10 /11 PRMS.......... .............................13 PRMD.......... .............................14 PRMN.......... .............................15 PRM2.......... .............................16 PRM3................ .......... ,.............. 17 PRM4........... .............................18 POLES & BASES ......................19 R .......... � �. 1 i OPTICAL SYSTEM ...................4 /5 CONSTRUCTION .....................6 /7 OPTIONS ...... ............................8 /9 ELEVATED SCALE ................10 /11 PRMS.......... .............................13 PRMD.......... .............................14 PRMN.......... .............................15 PRM2.......... .............................16 PRM3................ .......... ,.............. 17 PRM4........... .............................18 POLES & BASES ......................19 SPECIFICATIONS .....................20 WALL MOUNTING OPTIONS ... 21 PHOTOMETRY ....................22 /23 0 \7 balancing classic design with lighting performance. Well designed lighting provides safe, inviting illumination, of streets, boulevards, parks, and parking areas, enhancing the attractiveness of retail lined streets and public gathering areas. People feel safer using public areas that have smooth, even illu- mination. That means objects and people are easily "seen" in their environment without deep shadows and blind spots. An evenly lit environment makes it much easier for the hurnan eye to discern shapes and movement. Until the Promenade Series, period style lighting did not address the need for quality illumination ors streets and pedestrian; areas. The "acorn" style fixture had become the compromise of choice, with its many shortcomings of discomfort glare, high energy costs, and poor long term operating efficiency. Now, properly illuminated streets and pedestrian areas are possible with the Promenade Series from AAL. State of the art optical systems are incorporated in classically style fixtures. The reflector systems minimize glare, while providing more usable light on the ground where it is needed. Discover why the Promenade Series is the answer for performance and aesthetics in period style fixtures. The Promenade brings you the advantages of high quality illumination, low cost operation, and energy efficiency. High performance reflector systems for control A key element to good visibility when lighting an outdoor environment is uniformity. Uniformity is the ratio between the minimum to maximum, footcandle levels in the environment. Our eyes only perceive the minimum and maximum levels, whi i is why a luv minimum to maximum ratio is important. The Promenade's focused optical systen-s alloy, you to precisely aim the light, resulting in a smooth even illumination of the environment. The uneven pools of light common with other fixtures are eliminated. Objects in the environment are easier to identify because the perceived lighting level between fixti.ires does not vary. ! RI E M A superior lighting system for illuminating your streets and pedestrian areas compared to any lensed fixture. Conventional glass and plastic refractor lensed fixtures pollute the environment with glare and uncontrolled light. Promenade optics address local ordinances for disability glare. Avoid light pollution and stray illumination of adjoining areas with the precision reflector systems built into every Promenade fixture. Six precision optical systems let you place the light exactly where you need it. • Horizontal lamp reflectors are available in type 2,3,4, and 5 distribution patterns. • Vertical larnp reflectors are available in type 3 and 5 distribution patterns • Reflectors are rotatable on 900 centers for proper aiming. • Lamp wattages range from 70 to 400 watts in all standard metal halide and high pressure sodium lamp types including utility standards. • The Promenade is designed to use T -6 ceramic metal halide lamps to insure color accuracy and consistency. VERTICAL LAMP HORIZONTAL LAMP Symmetrical reflectors Cutoff reflectors for control for wide spacing. E1.1 ETLL r F '—t7 TYPE 3 TYPE 5 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 TYPE 5 Acorn Refractor Acorn Promenade Series HOW WELL CAN YOU RECOGNIZE OBJECTS AT NIGHT? Not very well if the luminaires are extremely bright compared to the objects around them. The pictures on the left demonstrate this phenomenon. Notice the difference in the "visibility" or clarity of nearby objects illuminated by a Promenade fixture. Dis- ability glare or "veiling luminance" (the contrast ratio between the brightness of the luminaire and surrounding objects) is greatly reduced. Visual perception is greatly improved with the Promenade Series. Tool -less access .............. using concealed, flip up latches on the PRMS, PRMD, and PRMN for easy access to the lamp and ballast. Fully sealed lamp chambers for long term lighting performance. Molded silicone gaskets insure trouble free sealing compared to neoprene materials. The lenses are easily replaced in the field and have full surround silicone gaskets. The ballast module is easy ................. to remove and features quick disconnects for easy field replacement. All ballasts are installed and tested at the factory. A w I r� All castings are A356 aluminum for maximum strength and corrosion resistance. No die castings are used. All fasteners and other hardware are stainless steel. .................. ..............................k Lenses are optical grade DR acrylic or tempered glass. DR acrylic lenses offer the impact resistance of polycarbonate without the yellowing caused by the sun and metal halide lamps. All lenses are captured within a silicone gasket for a perfect seal from the elements. Automated cleaning cycle Every AAL product receives our state of the art finishing process which includes a five stage impingement chemical clean- ing and sealing cycle, followed by a thermoset, super TGIC polyester powder finish coat. Changing egress codes require lighting around the building perimeter. This enables occupants to get a safe distance from the building in an emergency, The Promenade Series has a full range of emergency and egress lighting options. See section 3313 of the Uniform Building Code for further information. Four egress lighting options are available: 1. RST -The instant restrike ballast uses a standard 150 watt (or less) high pressure sodium lamp that will reignite the iarnp immediately after power is restored. 2. QRS -The quartz restrike option uses an electronic controller to energize a quartz lamp, providing illumination until the HID lamp is started or restored to full brightness. 3. QL -An auxiliary quartz lamp that is wired to a separate emergency power circuit. 4. IL -85, IL -165 Induction Lamp for PRMS, PRMD, PRMN. The QL induction lamp system from Phillips Lighting is a revolutionary lighting system featuring long life, better color rendering and "instant on" characteristics. The life expectancy of the QL lamps is 90% survival after 60,000 hours (16 years at 10 hours per night) and 65% survival after 100,000 hours (27 years at 10 hours per night). Benefits • Maintenance free operation saves the cost of frequent relamping. • Excellent color rendition remains consistent-throughout the lamp life. • Instant on for security and emergency lighting applications. • Electronic control for consistent light output under variable operating conditions. The QL85 lamp output is 6000 lumens, which is comparable to a 70 watt high pressure sodium lamp. The QL165 lamp output is 12000 lumens, which is comparable to a 150 watt metal halide lamp. The QL Induction Lamp system is available for the PRMS, PRMD and PRMN fixture styles. The standard QL configura- tion includes a type five distribution reflector and LDL lens. J&HEAD PRMS PRNID TF .9 FOLE L., r D' AAI X) I RNI- -A8 PRMN PRM3 f "A'U I AAL i y + i rs •a a ! r i ryy �"t�y 4 •Vi.!` «� ,t `r�..:i.��.1 �r. �G ..�`��l-ta�. �l,- .��. Y', •�.1 �. RG•Zg6'wl d'�. y + i rs •a r I _ ��� �j� {1111 ir!!'f }4+ i', I . l..I .,r• I. li t'•, r i� 1�1 ��1�4, } " F �� • 1 1 I�t • j(, 1 1 r 1 I Ir 1 +�i ir�lr+r PLI X j A tA R'llemilisfUNIC, Will 11 \ P u I r f � l�� tr1 e'V+9(;l fir{ a ! r i ryy �"t�y 4 �t�tf +x n r I _ ��� �j� {1111 ir!!'f }4+ i', I . l..I .,r• I. li t'•, r i� 1�1 ��1�4, } " F �� • 1 1 I�t • j(, 1 1 r 1 I Ir 1 +�i ir�lr+r PLI X j A tA R'llemilisfUNIC, Will 11 \ P u I r f � l�� tr1 e'V+9(;l fir{ ikk 10ST TOP OR ARM r,,10UNTED CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRMS V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRMS V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRMS H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRMS H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRMS H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRMS H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRMS IL85 includes a 85 watt QL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify 120 or 277 volt. PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt QL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277 volt. Includes an LDL Lens. • •' WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze BLK Black DGN Dark Green MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green ATG Antique Green CRT Corten :'ustom and RAL colors are available at an .tra cost. Please submit a color sample or [SAL color number. CHM Glass chimney, with brass holder. LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture interior and reduce lamp brightness. TA27 Adapter to slip a post top mounted head over 27/8" tenon (specify tenon dimensions). RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less HIPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5 only. See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. 70MH uses medium base ED- 171amps. 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 10OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 100 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 175MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 25OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 70HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 70 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 100HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. — 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. ORDERING cIXTURE BALLAST/LAMP ARM POLE COLOR OPTIONS WS V5 250MH DB5 -4F16 -188 BLK LDL PRMS H3 100HPS WMA35U 0 VGR CHM Refer to your AAL catalog for a'complete listing of available arms and poles. 13 DIMENSIONS: 36" x 19" dia 915ner�i x 480 MM EPA= 2.75 WT.= 38 ass. IP RATING =54 Shown with tightly diffused lens (LDL) DIMENSIONS: 36" x 19" dia 865MM x 480 MM EPA= 2.10 WT= 34 Les. IP RATING= 54 CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRMD V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRMD V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRMD H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRMD H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRMD H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRMD H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRMD IL85 includes a 85 watt QL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify 120 or 277 volt. PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt QL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277 volt. Includes an LDL Lens. WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze BLK Black DGN Dark Green MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green ATG Antique Green CRT Corten Custom and RAL colors are available at an extra cost. Please submit a color sample or RAL color number. LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture interior and reduce lamp brightness. MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast arm (by others) FIST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less HPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5 only. See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. FIXTURE BALLAST/LAMP ARM BALLAST 70MH uses medium base ED- 171amos. 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 10OMH uses medium base ED- 171amps. 100 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 15OMH uses medium base ED- 171amos. 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 175MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamas. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a 1 POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 70HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 70 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 100HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. POLE COLOR OPTIONS 2 -PRMD V5 250MH TRA55 DB2 -5F20 -188 DGN LDL PRMD H3 100HPS WMA35U 0 VGR RST ' Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles. 14 4 CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRMN V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRMN V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRMN IL85 includes a 85 watt OL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify 120 or 277 volt. PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt QL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify 120 or 277 volt. Kole) • WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze BLK Black DGN Dark Green MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green ATG Antique Green CRT Corten Custom and RAIL colors are available at an extra cost. Please submit a color sample or _ -, RAL color number. BPS Struts are finished in a brass colored powder coating. LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture interior and reduce lamp brightness. RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less HPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5 only See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. FIXTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM / 2 -PRMN V5 250MH 2- TRA35U PRMN IL85 120 • 70MH uses medium base ED- 171amps. __ 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 70 watt metal halide r- hultitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 10OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 100 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 15OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 175MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 70H PS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. ____ 70 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 100HPS uses medium base ED-17 lamps. --- 100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps. _ 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. POLE COLOR OPTIONS DB2 -5R18 -188 BLK • DB9 -4R12 -125 DGN • Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles. Shown with lightly Clft4ed lens (LDL) DIMENSIONS: 36" x 19" dia 915MM x 480 MM EPA =2.75 WT. =38 LEIS. IP RATING= 54 PRM2 DIMENSIONS: 20" x 25" dia. 510MM x 635MM EPA =1.9 WT.= 45 LBS. IP RATING = 54 PRM2 -PM Slips over a 5" (127mm) diameter pole or tenon. DIMENSIONS: 40" x 25" dia. 1015MM x 635MM EPA = 1.9 WT.= 45 CBS. IP RATING = 54 ARM OR PFNDANT • POST TOP OR ARM MOUNT CAT NO DESCRIPTION CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRM2 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM2 -PM V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM2 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM2 -PM V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM2 H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM2 -PM H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM2 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM2 -PM H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM2 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM2 -PM H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM2 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRM2 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector • • ' aj WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze 175MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. BILK Black DGN Dark Green 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 ATG Antique Green CRT Corten Custom and RAL colors are available at an extra cost. Please submit a color sample or RAIL color number. •' • MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast arm (by others) FIST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt HPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast 175, 250 or 400 MH, V3 and V5 reflectors only. See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. lamps. 250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 40OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 150HPS uses mogul base ED- 23112 _lamps. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 250 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 400HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 400 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. ORDERING FIXTURE BALLASTAAMP ARM POLE COLOR OPTIONS PRM4 -PM V5 400HPS • D132 -51720 -188 DBZ LDL 2 -PRM2 H3 250HPS TRA5D DB10 -5R20 -250 BLK • . Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles. n� IF; 4- ARM OR PENDANT MOUNI I POST TOP OR ARM MOUNI CAT NO DESCRIPTION CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRM3 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM3 -PM V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM3 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM3 -PM V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM3 H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM3 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM3 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM3 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRM3 -PM H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM3 -PM H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM3 -PM H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM3 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector 70MH uses medium base ED-17 lamps. 70HPS uses medium base ED- 17lamps. 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 70 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 120/208/240/277 volt 70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 100HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 120/208/240/277 volt 10OMH uses medium base ED- 171amns. 100 watt metal halide multitap ballast :_::120/208/240 /277 volt uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 150 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 175MH uses medium base ED- 171amps. 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 120/208/240/277 volt. WHT BLK White Black DBZ DGN Dark Bronze Dark Green MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green ATG Antique Green CRT Corten Custom and RAL colors are available at an extra cost. Please submit a color sample or ZAL color number. 150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamas. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses moqul base E -18 lamps. 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast arm (by others) RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less HPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5 only See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. I A AU -iii PRM3 DIMENSIONS: 13" x 18" dia. 330MM x 460MM EPA =.85 _WT. =24 LeS. IP RATING= 54 PRM3 -PM Slips over a 4" (100mm) diameter pole or tenon. DIMENSIONS: 28" x 18" dia. 710MM x 460MM EPA =.85 WT. =29 ass. IP RATING= 54 PRM4 DIMENSIONS: 40" x 22" dia 660MM x 560MM EPA =1.9 WT. =45 Las. IP RATING--54 PRM4 vn with lightly diffused (LDL) PRM4 -PM DIMENSIONS: 40" x 22" dia 1020MM x 560MM EPA =2.56 WE= 49 ass. IP RATING = 54 PRM4 -PM Shn r, with lightly diffused leri, (L00 CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRM4 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM4 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM4 H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM4 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM4 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM4 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRMD I1-165 includes a 165 watt OL Induction Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277 volt. Includes an LDL Lens. WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze BILK Black DGN Dark Green MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green ATG Antique Green CRT Corten Custom and RAL colors are available at an extra cost. Please submit a color sample or LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture interior and reduce lamp brightness. MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast arm (by others) FIST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt HPS lamp (S55). QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp. Field wired to a separate circuit. HSS House side shield, factory installed PSB Pulse start ballast 175, 250 or 400 MH, V3 and V5 reflectors only. See the AAL catalog for a full range of decorative bases, arms and poles. FIXTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM CAT NO DESCRIPTION PRM4 -PM V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector PRM4 -PM V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector PRM4 -PM H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector PRM4 -PM H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector PRM4 -PM H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector PRM4 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector 175MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 175 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 40OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps. 250 watt metal halide multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28 lamps. 150HPS uses mogul base ED -23112 lamps. 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 200HPS uses mogul base E-18 lamps 200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 250 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt 400HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. 400 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt All fixtures prewired for 277 volts. POLE COLOR OPTIONS PRM4 -PM V5 400HPS DB2 -5F20 -188 DBZ LDL 2 -PRM2 H3 250HPS TRA5D DB10 -5R20 -250 BLK • e 1R E Li Poles and Bases BC5 BC6 BC7 BC8 14" X 24" 12" X 17" - 18" X 30" 12" X 36" 355 X 61 Omm 305 x 430mm 460 x 760mm 305 x 915mm TWO PIECE TWO PIECE SPLIT BASE WITH COLLAR TWO PIECE FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" POLE BASE COVERS Two piece base covers are cast #356 aluminum that fit over standard 4" (102mm) or 5" (125mm) round poles. Covers are attached with stainless steel hardware. Consult your AAL catalog for complete details on round poles. Specifications PRMS mounted to a cast holder for maximum heat dissipation. Medium HOUSING base, (mogul base for 200 and 250 watt lamps) porcelain sock - ' ' The entire fixture shall be cast aluminum, certified as re A356 alloy,, free of an porosity, foreign materials s : ets shall be pulse rated. The electrical assembly shall be installed Sockets for T-6 lamps are G12 type. oreignn N and prewired in the fixture. OM cosmetic fillers: Castings shall be of wall thick- CERTIFICATION ness, minimum .188" with no warping or mold shifting. The top shall hinge open by flipping up two integral Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use, latches. The concealed latch mechanism shall be all stainless' UL 1570 &1572 and Canadian CSA C22.2 no.g. IP = 54 steel. The top shall seal the lamp compartment with a full sur- MOUNTING round, molded silicone gasket. The tens shall be one piece clear, Post top mounting: the fixture shall slip over a four inch O.D. injection molded optical grade, DR acrylic, gasketed top and bot- . Pole and be secured to She pole with three stainless .steel set tom with silicone gaskets, and held in place with six clips for easy screws. ; lens replacement. The ballast assembly shall be accessible by Arm or wall mounting PRMS & PRMN: The fixture shall be, weld loosening three captive stainless steel screws, and then twist off ed to the cast arm; : -' the ballast module. The ballast module shall be sealed from the Arai or wail mounting PRMD: The fixture shall attach to a tran- damp chamber with a silicone gasket. Quick disconnects shall be sition casting that is welded to the arm. The transition piece shall used for all electrical connections. All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel. attach to the fixture with six stainless steel 1/4 -20 bolts and sealed with a silicone gasket REFLECTOR MODULE FINISH The optical assembly shaft be completely sealed with a silicone gasket to prevent dust, insect or moisture contamination. The Fife finish shag consist of a five 'stage'pretreatment regimen with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off and top coated,wini a reflector module shall consist of segmented, specular and semi " thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. 11 finish specular, Alzak® panels precisely formed and positioned within , . shall meet the AAMA 6()5.2 performance. specification ,which the housing. The reflector module shall be , mounted to a carrier includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resis- plate, rotatable on ninety degree increments for proper field post- lance. tioning. Reflectors shall meet the ANSHES standard for full cutoff ` reflectors. RELAMPING ELECTRICAL The top of the fixture shall hinge open'for relamping. Two inte- Aflelectrical components shall be U.L. recognized. Ballasts shall gral latches shall be flipped up to open the fixture for relamping. ' be high power factor rated for -30° starting. The ballast shall be • halide lamps are pin orientated and r :° HOUSING Sockets for horizontal metal WIM3 include a lamp stabilizer. The ballast assembly shall be installed .. The ballast housing shall be a one piece, high strength ' and prewired in the fixture: casting with an integral heat sink for the ballast assem- CERTIFICATION bly. Housing shall be cast aluminum, certified as pure A356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials or cos- Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use, metic fillers. The hood shall be spun 6061 aluminum welded UL 1570 &1572 and Canadian CSA C22.2 no.g. IP = 54 circumferentially to the ballast housing. The housing shall have an MOUNTING inner rolled flange to support the door frame. The door frame The fixture shall be welded to the cast arm for mounting the shall be an aluminum casting, hinged to the housing. The door TRAS and TRA 6 arm. frame shall be sealed to the housing with a molded silicone gas- . Wall mounting the WMA35 or WMA36: the fixture shall be weld ket and be secured with four captive screws.The lens on the ed to the cast arm. PRM2 and PRM3 shall be clear, tempered glass sealed to the Arm mounting other arms: The fixture shall attach door frame with a silicone gasket. Vertical lamp fixture shall have a sag glass lens, the horizontal lamp fixture shall have a flat glass .wall wel transition to a transition casting that is welded to the arm: The . Piece shall attach to the fixture with three stainless steel 1/4 -20 lens. The lens on the PRM4 shall be molded, optical grade DR acrylic. All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel. bolts and sealed with a silicone gasket. Post top fitter: the cast fitter shall be welded to the yoke and slip REFLECTOR MODULE a four inch od pole - PRM3 or a five inch od pole - PRM2 & PRM4 The optical assembly shall consist of an outer housing of alu- and secured with six stainless steel set screws. minuet that is completely sealed with a silicone gasket to prevent FINISH dust, insect or moisture contamination. The reflector module shall Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen consist of segmented, specular and semi- specular Alzak' panels with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off and top coated with a precisely formed and positioned within the housing. The reflector thermoset super TGIC polyester powder. coat finish. The finish module shall be rotatable on ninety degree increments for prop- shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which er field positioning. Reflectors shall meet the ANSI -IES standard includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resis- for full cutoff reflectors. tance. ELECTRICAL RELA All electrical components shall be U.L. recognized. Ballasts shall The lenns s door frame of the fixture shall hinge down for relamp- be high power factor rated for -30° starting. The ballast assem- ing. Four captive screws shall. be loosened to open the fixture for bly plate shall be mounted to the cast housing for maximum heat relamping (PRM2 &PRM4). One captive screw shalt be loosened ' dissipation. Mogul base porcelain sockets shall be pulse rated. to open the fixture on the PRM3. WARRANTY Fixtures shall carry a limited warranty of three years. Ballast components shall carry the ballast manufacturer's limited warranty. AAL products are proudly made in the U.S.A. of 100% U.S.A. content materials. 20 Wall Mounting Options r The Promenade fixtures are available on most AAL wall brackets. Pole mounted versions of these and other wall brackets insure design continuity for all the outdoor site lighting. Consult your AAL catalog for a complete selection of wall and pole mounted arms. Mounting hardware is not included. (� 20" '` Ftnmm im WMA 35D Wall plate is 8" x 14" (200 mm x 360 mm) WMA 39 Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm) fl 21" k----535mm WMA 55 Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm) n 38" 1 965mm 27" 685mm WMA 37 Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm) 26" 660mm I WMA 4 Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm) .. 91 LAMP TYPE LUMENS 7 CONVERSION FACTOR 70 MH, clear E -17 5200 .33 100 MH, clear E -17 8500 .53 175 MH, clear E -17 14000 .88 250 MH, clear E -28 22000 1.38 70 HPS, clear E -17 6400 .40 100 HPS, dear E -17 9500 .59 150 HPS, dear E -17 16000 1.00 250 HPS, dear E -28 27500 1.52 NOTE: N using a lamp with different lumen output than listed above, consult AAL for conversion factor. PRMN QL 10' 12' 14' 16' 2.00 1.38 1.02 .78 1.00 .69 .51 .39 .50 .35 .26 .20 .10 .14 .10 .08 10' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 0 1 2 3 4 5 a PRMN V3 LDL 150HPS E -17 14 MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 i 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 U) .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRMN V5 LDL 150HPS E -17 12' 14' 16' 18' W 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 0 1 2 3 4 5 The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount values to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature and atmospheric variations which affect fight output. To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below, multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the left. Mounting height is to the lamp center. All testing performed by a certified independent laboratory. Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD -Rom and our website at www.aal.net or call your local AAL representative. PRMS H3 150HPS E -17 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 Uj 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRMS V3 150HPS E -28 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 12' 14' 16' 18' LU 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 w 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 cc i 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 68 .50 .39 .30 27 .20 .15 .12 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRMS V5 150HPS E -28 12' 14' 16' 18' 0 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20 N 1.36 1.00 .77 .60 .68 .50 .39 .30 .27 .20 .15 .12 14' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 1 2 3 4 5 6 . 40 K J LAMP TYPE LUMENS ♦ CONVERSION FACTOR 100 MH, clear E -28 7800 .27 (Venture lamp #67868) 175 MH, clear E -28 14000 .48 250 MH, clear E -28 23000 .83 pin oriented lamp 400 MH, clear E -28 39000 1.40 pin oriented lamp 100 HIPS, clear E -17 9500 .33 150 HPS, clear E -17 16000 .55 250 HIPS. clear E -18 28000 1.00 400 HIPS, Gear E -18 50000 1.72 NOTE: If using a lamp with different k"W output than fisted above, consult AAL for conversion factor. PRM2 H2 250HPS E -28 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 14' 16' 18' 20' 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 w .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRM2 H3 250HPS E -28 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT ` one grid square equals one mounting height 14' 16' 18' 20' 0 w 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRM2 H4 250HPS E -28 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 14' 16' 18' 20' W 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 N [ 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 1 2 3 4 5 The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount values to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature and atmospheric variations which affect light output. To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below, multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the left. Mounting height is to the lamp center. All testing performed by a certified independent laboratory. Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD -Rom and our website at www.aal.net or call your local AAL representative. PRM2 H5 250HPS E -28 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT F 1 14' 16' 18' 20' AN 9 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 W 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 N 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRM2 V3 250HPS E -28 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals one mounting height 14' 16' 18' 20' LU °-, u 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 w 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 Cc 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRM2 V5 250HPS E -28 14' 16' 18' 20' W 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 W2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 J 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals 6 one mounting height �� nn Elk 1k E 1 2 3 4 5 6 PRM2 V5 250HPS E -28 14' 16' 18' 20' W 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20 W2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24 1.31 1.00 .79 .64 .66 .50 .40 .32 .26 .20 .16 .13 J 16' MOUNTING HEIGHT one grid square equals 6 one mounting height �� nn sm JO r • EM _ ' r' / DORADO COMPANY April 26, 2002 Mr. Robert D. Exel Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. 515 South Figueroa, Suite 1230 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Subject: Moorpark Marketplace Project Signage Permitting Evaluation for Freeway Visibility City of Moorpark, California This letter summarizes my investigation into the permitting feasibility of the Moorpark Marketplace Project signage adjacent to the State Route 23 and 118 freeways in the City of Moorpark. Two alternatives are proposed for the project* signage, one, an off - premise sign, to be located on the adjacent property to the south (Cypress Land Company), and the other an on- premise sign on the Moorpark Marketplace property. The conclusion of the analysis is that the permitting of a sign on the adjacent property to the south does not appear feasible and that the sign must be constructed on -site. The specific reasons for this conclusion are as follows: Off-Premise Sign Restrictions - Adjacent Property to the South (Cypress Land Company) When a sign display is located on a property advertising the businesses located on another property, it is considered Outdoor Advertising and is subject to Caltrans approval, the Outdoor Advertising Act, and the California Code of Regulations, Title 4 — Business Regulations. As a result, an annually renewable outdoor advertising license must be obtained and as well as a permit renewable every five years. The off - premise sign does not appear to be feasible for the following reasons: Visibilitv from the Landscaped Freewa Segment A sign will not be permitted that is visible from a designated Landscaped Freeway Segment. A Landscaped Freeway Segment is located just north of the SR- 118/New Los Angles Avenue interchange and a sign located on the adjacent property will be clearly visible to motorists traveling southbound on the SR -118 Freeway. (Reference: ODA Act, Article 8/Title 4 — Business Regulations, Chapter 5/ Discussions with ODA District Coordinator — Caltrans District 7) 3696 Summit View Court - Corona, Califomia 92882 PHONE (909) 273 -0086 FAX (909) 273 -0096 00 Robert D. Exel April 26, 2002 Page 2 of 3 Adjacent Commercial/Industrial Use Restriction and Zoning The sign must be constructed within 1,000 feet of a commercial or industrial use, but the use must be constructed and operational. This restriction impacts the timing of the sign permitting and construction. Based on current schedules, the Cypress Land Company Project will be occupied and operational at least one year after the Moorpark Marketplace Project. Consequently, the sign for the Moorpark Marketplace Project would be delayed for at least one year after the project opens. (Reference: Title 4 — Business Regulations, Chapter 3, Section 2401.d.3) The sign location is in an area designated for Open Space zoning. The sign location must be zoned commercial or industrial, so a zone change would be required. Access for Construction and Maintenance • Access to the sign for construction and maintenance from the freeway will not be permitted. An Encroachment Permit for access from the freeway would imply access rights and would not be granted. (Reference: Discussion with Caltrans District 7 Permits Division) • The sign location is proposed at the top of an 80 -foot high steep slope. Construction of an access road and turn around area for maintenance trucks would be financially prohibitive and visually obtrusive. On- Premise Sign Restrictions Basically, other than the restrictions listed below, an on- premise sign may only specifically advertise the businesses and uses located on site. The sign height and dimensions are completely at the discretion of the City and are not subject to Cal cans review or approval. The following restrictions are prohibitive to purchasing a portion of the Cypress Land Company property for the placement of the sign: Purchasing of a Stri p of Land (From Cypress Land Company) to Incorporate Slope and Off - Premise Sign Location into the Moorpark Marketplace Project Purchasing a narrow strip of property, unusable for any other purpose than a sign, and placing a display at or near the end violates the criteria for an on- premise sign and is considered outdoor advertising. This means the restrictions mentioned for the off - premise sign would apply, even though the property would be within the Moorpark Marketplace Project. (Reference: Title 4 — Business Regulations, Chapter 1, Section 2243.d) Robert D. Exel April 26, 2002 Page 3 of 3 • The sign must be within 1,000 feet of the point on the property (a building use) or within 1,000 feet of the entrance to the site. The nearest building measured horizontally from the sign is approximately 1,200 feet. This criteria would also subject the sign to outdoor advertising requirements. (Reference: ODA Act, Article 3, Section 5272.d) Due to the restrictions associated with the placement or the sign on the Cypress Land Company property, an on- premise sign appears to be the only feasible alternative for the project. The sign could be located near the access drive behind the proposed Kohl's building. Another viable location appears to be at the northeast corner of the property at the top of slope adjacent to New Los Angeles Avenue and the southbound freeway on -ramp. Sincerely, Apr -30 -02 02:23pm From - CHRISTENSEN FILLER 310 - 556 -2920 T -056 P.002/002 F -047 CHRISTENSEN, MILLER, )FINK, JACOSS, GLASER, WEIL & SHAPIRO, LLP 7ri mERirAS LAW RRMS WORLDWIDE MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Exel FROM: Mark Armbruster DATE: April 26, 2002 SUBJECT: Caltrans freeway Right of Wgy Access Issue: Cypress Moomark Proiect I. Placement of off-premises siianage within freeway Riabit of Way (ROVD: Caltrans does not permit placement of off - premises signs on freeway ROW. TI. Maintenance access through freewn ROW: • Caltrans does not typically allow any type of access through freeway ROW unless the access is of a temporary nature only (e.g., temporary construction access). • Caltrans has an "exception" procedure which allows, under very specific circumstances, exceptions to Caltrans' policy of ROW access denial. • All "exception agreements" must be made between Caltrans and another governmental jurisdiction (i.e., county or city); Caltrans cannot enter into an exception agreement with a private entity. Thus, if an exception were to be granted to our project, the City of Moorpark would have to be applicant in any such agreement. • In order for an exception to be granted by Caltrans, a determination must be made by Caltrans that all feasible alternatives to access through Caltrans' freeway ROW have been explored, and that there are no other feasible alternatives due to physical or environmental (e.g., an endangered species or wetlands would be threatened) factors; prohibitive cost is not a factor that can be used as rationale for allowing freeway ROW access exception. • The Caltrans District Office must fully endorse exception agreement application, and must submit its full endorsement to CalLmns Sacramento headquarters along with a detailed explanation as to why the freeway ROW access exception is necessary. • In order for Caltrans to grant a ROW access exception, the agency must find that the grant would provide a benefit to Caltrans (e.g., would provide landscaping along a freeway, etc.). 273366.1 LM THE ZELMAN COMPANms 515 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 1230 - LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 - TELEPHONE (213) 533 -8100 - FAX (213) 533 -8118 April 19, 2002 Via Facsimile & Mail (805) 529 -8270 Mr. Steve Kueny City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Target Transaction Moorpark Marketplace Dear Steve: At Target's Capital Project Request Meeting on April 17, 2002 Target conditionally approved submission of the Moorpark Marketplace transaction to their Capital Expenditure Committee for final approval on May 14, 2002. The conditions precedent to Target's final approval are as follows: Target approval of final City of Moorpark Conditions of Approval in connection with CPD Permit No. 2001 -01 and VTTM No. 2351. 2. Confirmation and approval of the amount of the Air Quality (TSM) fee. 3. City approval of a pylon sign which will be visible from both sides of Highway 23 (see attached letter dated June 8, 2000 from John Grimes). All of these issues must be resolved to Target's satisfaction prior to their May 14th Capital Expenditure Committee Meeting. Target has emphatically stated that they will not commit to Moorpark Marketplace unless and until they are resolved. As you know, all other tenants in Moorpark Marketplace have conditioned their commitments to this project on the inclusion of Target and Kohl's in our lineup. Therefore, any assistance you can provide in resolving these issues prior to May 14, 2002 will be greatly appreciated. ZELMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. ZELMAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, INC. ZELMAN RETAIL PARTNERS, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION C:\Iena\zrpVnoorpark\rde\kueny target transaction 041902.doc Sincerely, ZELMAN RETAIL TNERS, INC. Robert D. Exel cc: John C. Grimes, Jr. (w/ encl.) Paul Giuntini (w/ encl.) Bill Bauman (w/ encl.) Ben Reiling (w/ encl.) Brett M. Foy (w/ encl.) RDE:lb Enclosures C:Uena\zup\rnoorparklyde\kueny target transaction oa l9az.aoc TARGET CORPORATION O Direct Dial: 612.761.1559 Fax: 612.761.3 728 3uN 1 % 2000 June 8, 2000 Mr. Robert D. Exel Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. 707 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 3036 Los Angeles, CA 90017 VIA FAX 213 -553 -8118 RE: PROPOSED TARGET - MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA. Dear Bob: I am in receipt of your meeting notes from your recent meeting with the City of Moorpark and would like to re- emphasize the following points: 1. In order for Target Corporation to proceed with the above project, we must have a full movement access point off of Science Drive which aligns with the front of our store. 2. The overall fee structure needs to be reduced. 0 3.J As part of the overall sign program we need to develop a pylon sign which will be visible from �/ both directions along Highway 23. As we discussed at our last meeting with the City, in order to achieve an October 2001 opening we must have all entitlements, including resolution of the above issues, in place no later than September 1, 2000. If this date can not be achieved, our next opening date would be March 2002 and we would obviously miss the 2001 Christmas season. Please feel free to share my comments with the City of Moorpark officials or give me a call should you have any questions. truly yours, hn C. Grimes, Jr. Regional Real Estate Manager JCG /jr rycglca\rnoo rpark-exel.doc MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council ITEM - t3 CITY OF AlnnRP�RK. rAT,TrORN'TA (;itv Cmmcil '1l�eti��* ACTION': - �rvY�t' Ste' �-� irry�• 717F__�� From: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director rJ Prepared By: Joyce Parker - Bozylinski, Planning Consultant ny J Date: April 25, 2002 (CC meeting of 5/1/02) Subject: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01, a request for a Change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential, Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 Dwelling Units /Acre, a 22 -Lot Single - Family Residential Subdivision, and a Variance to Allow an 11.5 -Foot High Sound Wall on Property Located at the Northeast Corner of Flory Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Development Company SUMMARY The Planning Commission on March 25, 2002, held a public hearing and adopted Resolution No. PC- 2002 -422 recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 for the subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 for construction of 22 single family homes, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 to change the land use designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 to change the Zoning Designation from R- 2 (Two - Family Residential) to RPD -9U (Residential Planned Development 9 dwelling units per acre) and Variance No. 2002 -01 to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height on a parcel of land (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. BACKGROUND The proposed project is the southerly 2.44 -acre portion of the existing Flory School site, located at 30 Flory Avenue. The Flory School site consists of a total of approximately 12.02 acres and includes the Flory Elementary School, Moorpark Unified School cc 020501stl1pt 091mer- 4126102 -9:55 AM Cn Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 2 District administrative offices and until recently the school bus vehicle maintenance operations and a school bus parking lot. Prior to submitting an application for the project, the applicant met with an Ad Hoc committee consisting of the City Manager, two City Councilmembers (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper), the applicant and Moorpark Unified School District representatives to discuss the issues related to developing the site. These issues; including Los Angeles Avenue street improvements, interior street design, setbacks and landscape parkways are discussed in detail in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 1). nrcrrTacTnN Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 would create twenty -two lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet. The applicant is proposing a small lot subdivision that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is offset 5 feet from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a 5' wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this 5 feet for driveway and yard purposes. Two separate and distinct house plans known as the "two pac" are utilized in this type of small lot subdivision. The applicant is proposing three building footprints shown on the site plan as Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3. The garage for Plan 1 is located 20 feet from the front property line and the garage for Plan 2 is located approximately 44 feet from the front property line. These two house plans make up the "two pac" that works with the "Z" lot line subdivision. Essentially, the useable outdoor space for Plan 1 is located at the rear of the house where as for Plan 2, which is located further back on the lot, the area in front of the garage is utilized as useable outdoor space. The third house plan, Plan 3, will be located on the end lots (Lots 1, 11 and 22) and will be utilized to provide the three required affordable housing units. All the homes are proposed as two -story structures with Mediterranean style architecture. The applicant is proposing to utilize three different architectural styles including Spanish, French County and Tuscany. Utilizing these three styles on two different building plans (Plan 1 and Plan 2) allows six different building elevations. The elevation of Plan 3 consists of the garage elevation and the second story above the garage since it is narrower than the other two plans. The main pedestrian entrance on the Plan 3 home is located on the side of the house and is not visible from the front. In response to staff comments on the proposed Plan 3 elevations (as noted in the Planning Commission report), the \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc c on �� Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 3 applicant added additional architectural features to ensure that the affordable units blended into the project. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended that the footprint for Plan 3 on Lots 1 and 22 be reversed so that the front entry is located on the side of the unit that faces Flory Avenue. The Planning Commission further recommended that the homes on Lots 1 and 22 have access directly from Flory Avenue. Staff's interpretation of this recommendation is that the driveways would remain on "A" Street; however, a gate and pedestrian access walkway would be added along Flory Avenue. Although the revised plot plan submitted by the applicant does address the revised orientation of the Plan 3 units, it does not show the gate and pedestrian access walkway to Flory Avenue. The applicant has indicated that the gate and walkway can be accomplished. Condition No. 17.c. was added to the Planning Commission recommended Residential Planned Development Conditions of Approval to address the gate and pedestrian access requirement. Staff's recommendation to the City Council is that Condition No. 17.c. be deleted and the gates and pedestrian access onto Flory Avenue for Lots 1 and 22 not be required to maintain effective noise attenuation and allow parking to be prohibited between Los Angeles Avenue and "A" Street along the east side of Flory Avenue. The project includes a landscaped area ranging in width from 9 feet to 14 feet along Flory Avenue. This landscaping will be installed by the applicant but will be maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District. In addition to the landscaping, the applicant has agreed to provide a monument sign at the corner of Flory and Los Angeles Avenue that would read "Walnut Acres" to identify the name of the historical subdivision for the area. The applicant will be required to dedicate from 13 to 15 feet along the southern property boundary abutting Los Angeles Avenue. The City is currently finalizing plans to make improvements to Los Angeles Avenue. These plans call for a 118 -foot right -of -way, which would include a half street of 51 feet with an 8 -foot wide sidewalk. The proposed condition of approval for the Los Angeles Avenue right -of- way requires the Developer to irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. Staff will be investigating further whether a dedicated right -turn lane for Flory Avenue and Moorpark Avenue may be accommodated. Staff is recommending a change to Condition of Approval No. 80 for the Tract Map to require a 50 -foot curve radius for the westbound Los Angeles Avenue right turn onto Flory Avenue northeast corner of Los Angeles and Flory Avenues) as follows: \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc �ti �� -W Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 4 80. The Developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. The amount of property needed for the right -of -way for Los Angeles Avenue and the location of the sidewalk shall be as determined by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director, and shall include sufficient right -of -way to accommodate a 50 -foot curve radius at the northeast corner of _Los Angeles and Flory Avenues. The Developer shall be required to install landscaping south of the property line wall in the area not required for street improvements and sidewalk. Landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue shall be shown on the landscape plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. If approved by the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Caltrans, the sidewalk width may be reduced to six (6) feet if determined necessary to achieve adequate landscape area adjacent to the southerly property line wall. The applicant will be required to provide a landscape planter with tree well cutouts along the Los Angeles Avenue perimeter wall (currently planned to be 5 to 7 feet wide) . Permanent landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue will be maintained as part of a Landscape Maintenance District Access to this project will be provided via Flory Avenue. A new public street (shown as "A" Street) will be created that will be 36 feet wide curb -to -curb with 4 -foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the street. Although this street width does not conform to the standard public street width of 40 feet, staff and the City Council Ad Hoc Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) are recommending approval of "A" Street as a public street. "A" Street will dead -end into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern edge of the project. Parking will be permitted only on the south side of "A" Street, with "No Stopping at Any Time" signs to be placed on the north side at each end of "A" Street and at intervals not exceeding 175 feet. State Redevelopment law requires that 15% of new residential units constructed within the Redevelopment Area be affordable to low and moderate - income households, and that 40% of those units be affordable to very low- income households. This would require the applicant to provide three affordable units, and staff's recommendation is that one unit be affordable to a very low- income \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 5 household and two units be affordable to a low- income household (as reflected in the conditions of approval). The City is currently negotiating with the applicant to build units on the adjacent City owned property on Millard Street. These units would also be affordable to low- income households. If the applicant is ultimately chosen to build the units, the intent is those units would be constructed concurrently with this project. The Planning Commission recommended that the City have the applicant build the units on the City owned parcel. The Commission's opinion was that having the applicant construct the units would ensure that both projects would be consistent in terms of quality and architecture and would also provide for better coordination and less disruption to adjacent residents during the construction phase. As part of the review of this project a noise study was conducted that analyzed the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. The General Plan establishes an interior energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA, which applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit and mobile home parks. The noise study completed for this project determined that in order to meet the exterior City noise standards, a sound wall would need to be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue. This sound wall will need to be 9.5 feet high on Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet high on Lots 3 through 9 and 11.5 feet high on Lots 10 and 11. In addition, the sound wall will need to extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. Since the maximum wall height for solid walls allowed per Code is 6 feet in height (eight feet if abutting an industrial zone) , a variance will be required for the sound wall. In order to approve a Variance, the City Council must make certain findings, which are outlined in the City Council Resolution. The Planning Commission was concerned with the height of the wall and concurred with staff that a 2 -to -3 foot high planter wall should be constructed abutting the sidewalk. This would reduce the visual height of the wall to a maximum of 8 feet. The Commission also recommended that the landscaping along the wall include fast growing vines. Providing tree wells along the perimeter of the wall will also help break up the mass of the wall. The northern boundary walls of the proposed project will be constructed approximately 45 feet from the school building currently used to house the Moorpark Police Department. This will essentially block the existing parking spaces located in front of the building. \ \MOR PRI SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer . doc d-,W N.0 v v� Honorable City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002 Page 6 In order to provide vehicular access around the building the Planning Commission recommended that staff work with the School District to design a one -way driveway with parallel parking spaces provided at the front entryway. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment 7) . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2002 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. 4. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, and Variance No. 2002 -01 subject to conditions of approval, and including modification of TTM Condition No. 80 and deletion of RPD Condition No. 17.c. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Staff Report of March 25, 2002 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2002 -422, with Recommended Conditions of Approval 3. Project Exhibits A. Tentative Tract Map B. Plot Plan C. Grading Plan D. Drainage Plan E. Floor Plans F. Elevations G. Typical Front Yard Landscape Plan 4. Draft City Council Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 5. Draft Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01 6. Draft Resolution Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 7. Mitigated Negative Declaration 8. Traffic Noise Study \ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501stf rpt Colmer.doc t City of Moorpark Community Development Department Staff Report PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 25,2002 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 8. B. AGENDA REPORT PREPARED BY: Joyce Parker- Bozylinski, Planner and Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director RPD 2001 -01 Residential Planned Development Permit, TTM 5307 Tentative Tract Map, General Plan Amendment GPA 2001 -01 and Zone Change to allow 22 -lot subdivision; and Variance for an 11.5 -foot high sound wall. I ZC 2001 -01 }VAR 2002 -01 APN 512 -0 -11 -112 ICEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration APPLICANT: Colmer Development Company REQUEST: Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 for subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots. Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 for construction of a 22 single family homes, General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 to change the land use designation from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density) and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 to change the zone from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre and a Variance (VAR) to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project. LOCATION: Located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue, City of Moorpark. . u ROSER7S AVE PROJECT a NORTH c SITE 7 3 EsTHiR AVL J / f SBERMAN AVE LOS ANGELES AVL RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend approval conditions. ATTACHMENT / to City Council with Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 2 RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY: Recommend approval to City Council with conditions. BACKGROUND The subject application for the subdivision and development of a portion of the Flory School site to construct 22 single - family dwellings was submitted on March 25, 2001. Since submittal of the application, staff has been working with the applicant to resolve incompleteness issues. The Flory School site, located at 30 Flory Avenue, consists of approximately 12.02 acres and includes the Flory Elementary School, Moorpark Unified School District administrative offices and until recently school bus vehicle maintenance operations and a school bus parking lot. These two latter operations have now been moved to an industrial building purchased by the School District on Maureen Lane and the applicant is in escrow with the School District to purchase the property where these operations used to be located (approximately 2.44 acres of the 12.02 acre site). The offices of the Moorpark Food Pantry and Catholic Charities are housed temporarily in the building commonly referred to as the bus barn. when the applicant approached the City about developing the site for residential uses, an Ad hoc committee consisting of the City Manager, two City Council members (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper), the applicant and school district representatives was formed to discuss the issues related to developing the site. These issues, including Los Angeles Avenue street improvements, interior street design, setbacks and landscape parkways, are discussed in further detail in the staff report. In addition, the City Council exempted this site from the requirements of Resolution No. 99 -1578 regarding General Plan Amendment (GPA) Pre - screening procedures; since the site had been in review for some time and assessment by the Affordable Housing /Community Development Committee during a GPA Pre - screening process would be a duplication of effort. ORDINANCES AND POLICIES A Planned Development Permit requires a discretionary decision to authorize development and use on a site. Chapter 17.36.010 establishes standards for residential planned development zones and Chapter 17.32 of the Municipal Code establishes standards for parking, access and landscaping. The application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the existing land use designation and zone S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev].doc Ic r "t'% ^ �° V 4 y V Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 3 district for the property. Since the City Council is the final decision making body for legislative requests, it is the City's policy to forward all the related permits to the City Council for final action. Therefore, the Planning Commission action on this item will be a recommendation to the City Council. LAND USE DESIGNATION /ZONING /ADJACENT LAND USE Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site: Plan land use designation from S (School) North NA NA Los Angeles Avenue South S -R -2 Flory Elementary School East M R -1 Single Family Dwellings West NA NA Flory Avenue Definitions: R -2 (Two Family Dwelling, M (Medium Density 4 DU /Acre) and S (School). DISCUSSION The proposed residential subdivision will occupy the southern 2.44 acres of the existing Flory School site. The subdivision, which will abut Los Angeles Avenue between Flory Avenue and the Ventura County drainage channel, includes a rectangular piece of property approximately 217.48 feet by 489.95 feet. The northern boundary walls will be constructed approximately 45 feet from the school building currently used as a Sheriff Substation. This will essentially block the existing parking spaces located in front of the building. In order to provide vehicular access around the building, the School District will need to restripe the area to provide a driveway in lieu of the existing parking spaces. Access to the subdivision will be provided from Flory Avenue. The proposal includes the creation of a new east /west street shown as "A" Street on the Tract Map. Eleven residential lots will be located on each side of "A" Street, which dead ends into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern School District property line over the drainage channel. The applicant is currently negotiating with the City regarding the development of the City owned parcels located on the northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street. General Plan Amendment and Zone Change The application includes a request to change the existing General Plan land use designation from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density). Using a gross acreage of 2.446, the requested density is 'r'. 'fl. n S: \Community Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \02032$ RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 4 approximately 9 dwelling units an acre and using a net acreage (minus "A" Street and other public right -of -way dedications) the requested density would be 12 dwelling units an acre. In addition to a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change would be required to change the property from R -2 (Two family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre. Tentative Tract Map The Residential Planned Development (RPD) section of the Zoning Code specifies that the RPD permit shall determine the minimum lot size. Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 subdivides approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two lots ranging in size from 3,275 square feet to 4,478 square feet as follows: Lot 1 4,112 sq. ft. Lot 2 3,305 sq. ft. Lot 3 3,445 sq. ft. Lot 4 3,442 sq. ft. Lot 5 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 6 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 7 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 8 3,477 sq. ft. Lot 9 3,494 sq. ft. Lot 10 3,414 sq. ft. Lot 11 3,275 sq. ft. Lot 12 4,478 sq. ft. Lot 13 3,582 sq. ft. Lot 14 3,511 sq. ft. Lot 15 3,477 sq. ft. Lot 16 3,485 sq. ft. Lot 17 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 18 3,458 sq. ft. Lot 19 3,442 sq. ft. Lot 20 3,445 sq. ft. Lot 21 3,305 sq. ft. Lot 22 4,195 sq. ft. The applicant is proposing a small lot subdivision that maintains an interior "Z" lot line on every other lot. In "Z" lot subdivisions, the front portion of a side property line is off set five feet (51) from the back portion of the side property line. Each lot grants a five -foot (5') wide easement to the adjacent property either in the front or rear of the property. For instance, Lot 2 would grant a five -foot (5') easement along the front side property line to the adjacent Lot 3 and in turn Lot 3 would grant a five -foot (5') easement along their rear side property line. This allows each home to maintain a minimum side yard setback of five feet (5') but allows the adjacent property owner to utilize this feet (5') for driveway and yard purposes. Two separate and distinct house plans are utilized in this type of small lot subdivision. These are often referred to as a "Two Pac" plan as described below. Residential Planned Development The applicant is proposing three building footprints shown on the site plan as Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3. Plan 1 consists S: \Community Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 5 square feet with a 400 square foot garage and Plan 2 consists of 1,456 square feet with a 400 square foot garage. The garage for Plan 1 is located 20 feet from the front property line and the garage for Plan 2 is located approximately 44 feet from the front property line. These two house plans make up the "Two Pac" that works with the "Z" lot line subdivision. Essentially the useable outdoor space for Plan 1 is located at the rear of the house where for Plan 2, which is located further back on the lot, the area in front of the garage is utilized as useable outdoor space. This area is typically gated to provide the privacy and security found in rear yard areas. Gates are shown as optional on the landscape plan; however, a condition has been added that would require the applicant to provide vehicular gates on the Plan 2 lots. The third house plan, Plan 3, consists of 1,138 square feet and has a 450 square foot garage (which includes the laundry area). Plan 3 will be located on the end lots (lots 1, 11 and 22) and will be utilized to provide the three required affordable housing units. The living area for Plan 3 is 1,138 square feet and incorporates a combined living and dining area shown as the "great room" and provides only one bathroom on the second story. Setbacks The RPD zone establishes setbacks for market -rate, single - family residential projects and market -rate multifamily projects, but specifies that the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the RPD permit can modify these setback standards. The applicant is requesting approval of setbacks that would be consistent with a small lot subdivision. The proposed setbacks vary slightly based on the configuration of the lot. The following chart specifies the minimum setbacks: While the project does not include rear yard patios, the individual homeowner typically requests these after they purchase the home. Since setbacks are established as part of the RPD permit, it would be desirable to establish setbacks for patio covers and other accessory structures as part of this permit to prevent future problems for the new homeowners. A condition has been added that requires all patio covers and other accessory structures to maintain a 10 -foot rear yard setback and a 5 -foot side yard .C. *-% r. SXommunity Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C v " Plan 1 Plan.2 Plan 3 Front 16 ft. 16 ft. 20 ft. Garage 20 ft. 48.84 ft. 20 ft. Interior Side 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. Street Side NA NA 51 Rear 10' 20 ft. 12 ft. While the project does not include rear yard patios, the individual homeowner typically requests these after they purchase the home. Since setbacks are established as part of the RPD permit, it would be desirable to establish setbacks for patio covers and other accessory structures as part of this permit to prevent future problems for the new homeowners. A condition has been added that requires all patio covers and other accessory structures to maintain a 10 -foot rear yard setback and a 5 -foot side yard .C. *-% r. SXommunity Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C v " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 6 setback. This requirement will provide sufficient area to allow a covered patio on each of the lots either located in the rear of the building or in the case of Lot 11, on the side of the building. Architectural Style All the homes are proposed as two -story structures with Mediterranean style architecture. The applicant is proposing to utilize three different architectural styles including Spanish, French Country and Tuscany. Utilizing these three styles on two different building plans (Plan 1 and Plan 2) allows a total of six different building elevations. The proposed roofs will be either "S" tile or flat tile. The Tuscany plan incorporates stone around the window or window base, wood shutters, wrought iron balcony and stucco corbels. The French Country plan incorporates wood shutters, wooden potshelf at the bottom of some of the windows, decorative metal vents and a metal roof on a bay window. The Spanish plan incorporates stucco corbels, arched windows, decorative tile and a wrought iron element over one of the windows in Plan 2. The rear and side elevations of each unit are relatively unadorned. A condition has been added that would require the applicant to provide additional window treatment around all second story rear windows as these windows would be visible from either Los Angeles Avenue or the adjacent public school. The condition also includes a requirement to provide the additional window treatment on the second story side windows for the two homes that abut Flory Avenue (Lots 1 and 22) because the second story will be visible from both Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. Additional window treatment on the second story windows on the east side of the home proposed on Lot 11, which will be visible from Los Angeles Avenue, is also required. The predominant front elevation of Plan 3 consists of the garage elevation and the second story above the garage since it is narrower than the other two building plans. The main pedestrian entrance on the Plan 3 home is located on the side of the house and is not visible from the street. While this configuration presents some design challenges, staff believes that incorporating some of the architectural elements provided in the other two plans could enhance the front elevation significantly. As currently proposed, the Plan 3 units would not blend in with the other homes. Staff believes these units should for the most part appear similar in architectural style to the other homes. A condition has been added that would require the applicant to redesign the Plan 3 homes by �f-.' 4� S: \Community Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc " Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 7 incorporating some of the architectural elements found in the other plans. Landscaping, Signage and Walls The applicant will provide landscaping for the front yards of each of the homes as shown on the landscape plan. The submitted landscape plan includes deciduous front yard trees such as Alder, Poplar or Sycamore to be provided for each lot in addition to a turf area with flowering shrubs and perennials. Final plant selection will be reviewed by the City's landscape architect and approved by the Community Development Director. Each individual homeowner will maintain this landscaping, as no Home Owners Association will be formed. Any landscaping or hardscape (patio slab) in the rear yard will be the responsibility of the individual property owner. Although decorative driveway paving is conceptually shown on the floor plans, it is not the applicant's intent to include this type of paving in the construction of the project. The project includes a landscape setback area ranging in width from 9 feet to 14 feet along Flory Avenue. This landscaping will be installed by the applicant but will be maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District. In addition to the landscaping, the applicant has agreed to provide a monument sign at the corner of Flory and Los Angeles Avenue that would read "Walnut Acres," which is the name of the original subdivision and development. There will also be a monument sign for Walnut Acres placed on the northwest corner of Millard Street and Los Angeles Avenue when the City develops those lots. The applicant will also be required to provide a 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter with tree well cutouts along the Los Angeles Avenue perimeter wall. Permanent landscaping will.be maintained as part of a Landscape Maintenance District. Six -foot high slumpstone masonry walls are proposed for the rear and side property lines with wrought iron gates at the side property line. The rear perimeter wall along Los Angeles Avenue will consist of decorative design with pilasters, and will range in height from 9.5 feet to 11.5 feet as discussed in the Variance section of this staff report. The Community Development Director will approve the final wall design for all project walls. The site currently contains twenty -nine (29) mature trees. The City requires a valuation study be completed on all mature trees located on a development project site. The Tree Valuation Report completed for this project indicates that the site contains 19 mature Pine S:\CommunityDevelopment\Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev Ldoc C. /'I rX v v .. .... Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 8 trees and 10 mature Eucalyptus trees. Since these trees have not be properly maintained over the years and appear to have been stunted in growth due to the severe pruning to maintain clearance from the utility line, the report indicates that none of the trees are of significant value and worthy of preservation. The total valuation for all trees on the site is $26,900. The project has been conditioned to provide enhanced landscaping that totals the amount of the estimated tree impact pursuant to Municipal Code requirements. The Ad hoc Committee has recommended this be approved to assist with the affordable units to be constructed. Affordable Housing Requirements State redevelopment law requires that 15% of the proposed units be affordable to low and moderate - income families since this site is within the City's redevelopment project area. This would require the applicant to provide 3 affordable units. The applicant will be required to sell the units to the City who will then sell the homes with resale restrictions to ensure that they remain affordable in perpetuity. Two (2) of the units will be made available at affordable housing costs (30% of 70% of median income) to low income households, and one (1) unit will be made available at affordable housing cost (30% of 50% of median income) for very low income households. City is currently negotiating with the applicant to build units on the City owned property on Millard Street. These units would also be affordable to low and moderate - income families. While no agreement with had been worked out prior to the preparation of this staff report, the goal would be to make a determination on the disposition of the City owned property in the near future. If the applicant is ultimately chosen to build the units, they would be constructed concurrently with this project. Traffic and Circulation Access to this project will be provided via Flory Avenue. A new public street (shown as "A" Street) will be created that will be 36 feet wide curb to curb with 4 foot wide sidewalks (including top of curb) on both sides of the street. While this street width does not conform to the standard public street width of 40 feet, the City has agreed to accept the street as a public street. Staff recommends that the new public street built to serve this project dead -end into a hammerhead turn around at the eastern edge of the project, with no through street or pedestrian access to Millard Street. For traffic traveling on Los Angeles Avenue, taking a through access from Millard Street to Flory Avenue and the school s� ON S: \Community Development\Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C �, �- -�� Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 9 would not be much shorter than staying on Los Angeles Avenue. There is also a concern that through traffic at this location would create traffic and security problems for the development. Additionally, the intersection that would be created at Millard is too close to Los Angeles Avenue. However, there is no choice regarding the location for the intersection of "A" Street at Flory Avenue, since it provides access to the site. The recommended turn around allows the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency to achieve three (3) new affordable units on the adjacent site rather than the two (2) units that could be achieved with a through street configuration. The proposed "cul de sac" condition will work for the ultimate twenty -five (25) units that could be developed with the three (3) Redevelopment Agency units. The Ad hoc Committee reviewed several street alternatives for this site, including various widths for through travel to Millard Street. The Committee however supports staff recommendation for a permanent turn - around at the end of "A ". The applicant will be required to dedicate from 13 to 15 feet along the southern property boundary abutting Los Angeles Avenue. This will allow for an 8 -foot wide sidewalk and 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter. The City is currently finalizing plans to make improvements to Los Angeles Avenue. These plans call for a 118 - foot right -of -way, which would include a half street of 51 feet with an 8 -foot wide sidewalk. The City will be responsible for the improvements to Los Angeles Avenue to be funded by the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution fund. The applicant will be responsible for the installation of the landscaping in the 5 to 7 foot wide landscape planter. As noted earlier, the landscaping adjacent to the sidewalk would be maintained by a landscape maintenance district. Variance As part of the review of this project, a noise study was conducted that analyzed the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue on this project. The City has established interior and exterior noise criteria in order to protect the heath and welfare of the residents of the City. The interior noise limit established is an energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA and applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit and mobile home parks. The noise study completed for this project determined that in order to meet S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc C v .... _,i Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 10 the exterior City noise standards, a sound constructed along Los Angeles Avenue. This be 9.5 feet high on Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet 9 and 11.5 feet high on Lots 10 and 11. In will need to extend at least 20 feet to the of Lot 1 and on the east side of Lot 11. then transition gradually in height down to wall height. wall would need to be sound wall will need to high on Lots 3 through addition the sound wall north on the west side These extensions would a standard 6 -foot high In order to visually reduce the height of the perimeter sound wall, staff is recommending that a 2 to 3 foot high retaining wall be installed at the back of the proposed Los Angeles Avenue sidewalk. This would create a raised planter between the sidewalk and the perimeter wall. Adding a planter in front of the perimeter wall will help reduce the visual height of the wall and still allow sufficient room for small trees, shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. Since the City will be responsible for the completion of the Los Angeles Avenue improvements, this planter wall could be installed by the City. Since the maximum wall height allowed per Code for solid walls is 6 feet in height (eight feet if abutting industrial zone), a variance would be required for the sound wall. In order to approve a Variance, the Planning Commission must make certain legal findings. These findings and the project's compliance with these findings are noted below: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a six -lane major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue SXommunity Development \Everyone\Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt revl.doc " � n n Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 11 utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planter will be landscaped with small trees, shrubs and vines (as allowed by the footing locations) to further screen the wall. AGENCY REVIEW All requested conditions of approval from Agencies and Departments that have reviewed the Residential Planned Development and Tract Map have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Based upon the findings contained in the initial study, it was determined that the project would not have a significant effect upon the environment and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City provided public notice of the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. Mitigation measures were added to the project relative to the noise impacts from the traffic on Los Angeles Avenue. These mitigation measures include requirements for double pane windows, increased window thickness and gasketing of doors and the installation of a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The mitigation measures are outlined in the attached MND and will be made a part of the conditions of approval. A%, ON 4M SXommum ' Develo mentTve r5onePlannin Commission Agenda Re Po its \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer R t reNTdoc C. .. — . —..� Planning Commission Staff Report RPD 2001 -01, TT5307 March 25, 2002 Applicant: Colmer Development Page No. 12 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to making a recommendation. 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Residential Planned Development No. 2001- 01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, and Variance No. 2002 -01, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Exhibits A. Tentative Tract Map B. Plot Plan C. Grading Plan D. Drainage Plan E. Floor Plans F. Elevations G. Typical Front Yard Landscape Plan 2. Mitigated Negative Declaration 3. Noise Study 4. Draft Resolutions with Conditions of Approval 5. Letter Regarding Environmental Review Process from Department of Transportation dated March 11, 2002 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \020325 RPD 2001 -01 Colmer Rpt rev doc n ^. n + S C V" V V RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2001 -01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2001 -01, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 AND VARIANCE NO. 2002 -01 FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0 -11 -112 WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on March 25, 2002, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company for an approximately 2.44 acre site located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0 -11 -112); and WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically described as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01: A request for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from S (School) to VHD (Very High Density); Zone Change No. 2001 -01: A request for a change in the Zoning from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development) 9 dwelling units /acre; Tentative Tract Map No 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01: A request for subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two (22) single family residential lots and the construction of 22 single family units; Variance No. 2002 -01: A request to allow a sound wall up to 11.5 feet in height; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 25, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings and received public S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02.x; ATTACHMENT 2- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 2 testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 are consistent with the City's General Plan, subject to amendment of the land use designation as proposed. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission further finds that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 are consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission adopts the following additional findings: C.E.Q.A. Findinqs 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance 2002 -01 serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Residential Planned Development Permit and Variance. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance 02 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 3 various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01 Subdivision Map Act Findings: Based on the information set forth above, it has been determined that Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 0"' {` ^1 f° V" V V i9 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 4 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Residential Planned Development Permit Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. 7. The residential structure setbacks are appropriate for an infill residential project that includes affordable housing. Variance Findings: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a four - lane divided major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 5 expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planter will be landscaped with shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01 subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 4'0 /'' F'-, • -q C V V L -J, RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, TT 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 6 SECTION 5. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council direct staff that the Police Facility adjacent to the subject property be further studied to insure that adequate access, parking and circulation are maintained. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioner Haller, Vice Chair Landis, Commissioner DiCecco, Commissioner Parvin and Chair Otto NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2002. William F. Otto, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Acting Community Development Director EXHIBITS: A. General Plan Exhibit Map B. Zone Change Exhibit Map C. Conditions of Approval for Tract Map No. 5307, D. Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 01 -01 and Variance No. 02 -01. S: \Community Development \Everyone \PC FINAL RESO \pc 422 reso gpa zc rpd ttm var colmer.doc Modified: 04/24/02 GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT MAP i \` - W CHAP AR:�.1. �_� `► M►G�:'sr � < t ` � l>KEa1 �- Al ANc,ElE'S Cl tT S 'A CIO so � S t -3+m SnA) 310 2—&AAD SXA' FI/b FIt-A9Y C o oc RVYM A 4E. ?tli� 5T- niFU i 1 wumm ( suswa M& ui �---- RO6ERTS I ESTHEP _ <I � , SHEF3�l +.ti A E� HWY. 113: _ AVE. WJ A k' AVE S to VH NAJESs1G j � ,1 A , 1F z L. i� J ' % �' ' E►P. {:SALE 11t <-. aurrERSaD LM- A NORTH EXHIBIT A CC ZONING EXHIBIT MAP 'ER` cT IT N RUN 1►: JE. � f t .. a Mir LL, i FUG (A AVE.) C`� S (HWY. 11 S) S R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac 10-6 A NORTH A VF-. CL i - *E:STC.'TE Pl% _: FP.VCM +ALE llt� � LAN rMl LN • EXHIBIT B c .... APt1tNDE(} FR = 1 -3RD SnA) 3f0 Susya aVE. 1 iT 2 -QAM ST(w3 R(j8gi_TS Y Njo t � ,1 T-Ite FLCRY z L�5 SHERH.� 1 ,�NGELE� (HWY. 11 S) S R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac 10-6 A NORTH A VF-. CL i - *E:STC.'TE Pl% _: FP.VCM +ALE llt� � LAN rMl LN • EXHIBIT B c .... RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 9 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1. Application of City Ordinances /Policies: The conditions of approval of this Tentative Tract Map and all provisions of _ the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies at the time of tentative map approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map. 2. Acceptance of Conditions: Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation which references conditions of approval shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 3. Expiration of Map: This Tentative Tract Map shall expire three (3) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one (1) year extensions for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made in writing, at least 30 -days prior to-the expiration date of the permit. 4. Hold Harmless: The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 10 subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. 5. Effect of Conditions: No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. The approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included as an attachment to the approving resolution, and all mitigation measures are requirements of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. 6. Severability: If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. Duplication of Conditions: All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Tentative Map, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occurs and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community Development Director will determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. B. Title Report: Prior to Approval of the Final Map, the subdivider shall submit to the Department of Community S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 " RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 11 Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report which clearly states all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 9. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to approval of the Final Map, the builder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of the final map and improvement plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, into an electronic imaging format acceptable to the City Clerk. - 10. Consistent with the City's General Plan Housing Element, State law and Moorpark redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan, the Tentative Tract Map is subject to execution of an Affordable Housing Agreement between the City of Moorpark and the Applicant or Developer. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall set forth the procedure for meeting an affordable housing requirement of fifteen percent (15 %) of the total number of approved dwelling units. The Agreement may be part of a Development Agreement. Execution of the Affordable Housing Agreement is required prior to first final map approval. 11. Outstanding Case Processing Costs: The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the Tentative Map. 12. Submittal of Landscape Plans: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading, Applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan, together with specifications and a separate Maintenance Plan. The Landscape Plan shall encompass all areas required to be planted consistent with these conditions of approval. The Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to Zoning Clearance for grading permit, or first Final Map approval, whichever occurs first. All of the following Landscape Plan and inspection requirements shall be complied with: S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 12 a. Prior to initial review of the landscape plans, the Applicant shall deposit funds for plan review in an amount specified by the Community Development Director. The Applicant shall deposit additional funds upon request as needed to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. Any deposit balance remaining following final approval of the installation shall be refunded to the Applicant. b. All plant material shall conform to the current issue of the American Standard for Nursery Stock published by the American Association of Nurserymen. C. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant's landscape architect shall provide written certification to the City, stating that the installation is in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plans. d. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant shall provide a written certification for the operation of the backflow device. e. All backflow preventers, transformers, and other above -grade utilities shall be appropriately screened with walls and /or plantings. f. The planting and irrigation design shall comply with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. g. Prior to occupancy, the landscape installation shall be approved by the Community Development Director. This approval shall be based upon written certification of the landscape installation by the City Landscape Consultant. h. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for front yard landscaping for all residences. Front yard landscaping shall be installed as determined by the Residential Planned Development Permit for all lots in this project as reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to final inspection and release of utilities. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 13 i. The landscape plans shall be revised to eliminate poplar trees as a front yard tree. j. The developer shall utilize a fast growing vine species along the outside of the perimeter wall along Los Angeles Avenue. 13. Ultra -low water consumption plumbing fixtures shall be installed consistent with City Ordinance No. 132. The project shall also include a requirement for the following _ energy saving devices or construction features: a. Stoves, ovens, and ranges, when gas fueled shall not have continuous burning pilot lights. b. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night setback features. C. Kitchen ventilation system shall have automatic dampers to ensure closure when not in use. 14. Fence /Wall Plan: A fencing, perimeter, gate, and privacy barrier wall plan, complete with related landscaping details, identifying the materials to be used and proposed wall heights and locations shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading. All fences /walls along lot boundaries shall be in place prior to occupancy of each lot, unless timing for installation is otherwise stated in these conditions. Where applicable prior to approval of the final fence /wall plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of property line wall with existing fences and or walls on adjacent residential properties. The Developer is required at his /her sole expense to connect or reconstruct adjacent residential walls and or fences to the project perimeter wall utilizing the same type of material that comprises existing walls and or fences that are to be connected to the project perimeter wall. 15. Sight Distance on Fence /Wall and Landscaping Plans: The Developer shall submit fence /wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 t� ii RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 14 16. Final Design: The final design and location of all walls and fences, streetscape elements, urban landscaping are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 17. Prior to Final Map approval, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City any easements required for the City to access and maintain any landscaped areas or drainage improvements outside of the public right - of -way, which have been designated -to be maintained by the City. In addition, prior to Final Map approval for any phase, the Applicant shall also provide to the City a signed Petition /Waiver a) requesting formation of an Assessment District to fund future costs for the maintenance of any landscaping and /or drainage facilities designated to be maintained by the City, and b) waiving all rights conferred by Proposition 218 with regard to the right to protest any such assessments. Said Petition and Waiver shall include, as an Exhibit, an Engineer's Report fully setting forth a description of the assessment district and the assessments, consistent with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code. Said report shall be prepared by a consultant to be retained by the City. The Applicant shall pay to the City a $5,000 advance to fund the cost of the Engineer's Report. In the event it is determined that there will be no landscaping or extraordinary drainage improvements to be maintained by the City, the Community Development Director may waive this condition with the concurrence of the City Manager. 18. Prior to Final Map approval, the City Council shall determine which areas shall be maintained by a maintenance assessment district. 19. Fish and Game Fee Requirement: Within two (2) days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089, and Fish and Game Code S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 ! ^•r),4 -,, a �` RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 15 Section 711.4, the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 20. Miscellaneous Fees: Applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, Applicant is subject to all fees imposed by City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 21. Cable Television: During construction, Developer shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to all parcels and lots in the Project. Developer shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide Developer a list of Cable Franchisees upon Developer's request. 22. In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the Project or individual lots under collective arrangement or any collective means other than a Cable Franchisee (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the HOA shall pay monthly to City an access fee of five percent (5%) of gross revenue generated by the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter 5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or supplementary provision thereto. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 16 23. Disclosure Statement: Developer is required to record a Notice to Purchaser as notification and disclaimer to all buyers of lots in Tract 5307 of the future widening of Los Angeles Avenue adjacent to. the Tract and that homes adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue are subject to potential intrusive noise from traffic. Prior to recordation, the Notice to Purchaser shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The Notice to Purchaser will be signed by all future buyers to document acknowledgment of disclosure. 24. Redevelopment Area Affordable Housing Requirements: To meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code 33410 et seq., as a condition of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Developer shall agree as follows: a. Low Income Units: i. Provide two (2) three (3) bedroom units of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (80% of Median income). The first low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the seventh (7th) market rate unit of the project; and ii. The second low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the eighteenth (18th) market rate unit of the project. b. Very Low Income Unit: Provide one (1) three (3) bedroom unit of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for very low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (50% of Median income). The very low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02'^ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 17 a certificate of occupancy for the fifteenth (15th) market rate unit of the project. 25. Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan and Affordable Housing Agreement: The initial sales price, location of the affordable units, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, respective role of the City and the Developer, and any other item determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in an Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the first final Tract Map for this project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with Tract 5307 conditions of approval. 26. Affordable Housing Agreement Preparation Fee: Developer shall pay to City the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the City's cost to prepare the required affordable housing plan and agreement. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONDITION: 27. Park and Recreational Facilities (Quimby) Fee: Prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, the subdivider shall pay fees in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). The fee for the three affordable units shall be $4,000 per dwelling unit. The fee for the market rate units shall be determined based on Subdivision Ordinance requirements. C. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: General Conditions: 28. The Developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all site improvements within the development and offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �„y x,'23 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 18 29. The Developer shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 30. If hazardous materials are found on the site, the Developer shall stop all work and notify the City immediately. The Developer shall develop a plan that meets City, State and Federal requirements for its disposal. 31. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department Waterworks District No. 1. 32. All existing and proposed utilities shall be under grounded as approved by the City Engineer. This also includes all existing above ground power lines adjacent to the project site along Flory Avenue (not Los Angeles Avenue) that are less than 67Kv. 33. Prior to improvement plan approval, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Fire Prevention Division and obtain the approval of the location of fire hydrants. 34. This project shall not create any non - conforming lots in violation of the Map Act or local ordinances. The Developer shall provide all easements and rights -of -way granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 35. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits shall be provided to the City Engineer. Prior to Final Map Approval Conditions: 36. The Developer shall submit to the Department of Community Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report, which clearly states all interested parties S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 eN op" RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 19 and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 37. Any mapping that requires review and approval by the County of Ventura shall be concurrently submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Developer shall be responsible for all associated fees and review costs. 38. A final tract map prepared by a California Registered Engineer meeting all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall be submitted for review by the City Engineer. 39. Any lot -to -lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easement shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance in the form of an agreement shall be provided to the City that these easements shall be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. Said agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall include provisions for the owners association to maintain any private storm drain or National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, hereinafter NPDES system not maintained by a City Assessment District and shall be a durable agreement that is binding upon each future property owner of each lot. 40. On the Final Map, the Developer shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark all right -of -way for public streets. 41. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City for review and prior to approval, the Developer shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written evidence of compliance shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Grading Conditions: 42. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties shall not be allowed without mitigation. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C.'^ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 20 43. ROC, NOx and dust during construction grading will be suppressed by the following activities: a. The fuel injection of all diesel engines used in construction equipment should be retarded two degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation. b. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors. C. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use reformulated diesel fuel. d. Construction grading shall be discontinued on days forecasted for first stage ozone alerts (concentration of 0.20 ppm) as indicated at the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District air quality monitoring station closest to the City of Moorpark. Grading and excavation operations shall not resume until the first stage smog alert expires. e. All clearing and grading activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 miles per hour averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. f. All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h. Facilities shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. i. Large -scale construction vehicles and trucks exiting the project site during the mass grading period shall be required to have tire wash -downs to minimize the dispersion of dust onto local streets. 44. Prior to issuance of the initial grading permit, the developer shall prepare an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to address construction impacts and long -term operational effects on downstream environments and S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 F* C ti ✓ . r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 21 watersheds. Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Professional or a qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The use of jute or other artificial cover approved by the City Engineer will be required for all graded slopes during the period of October 1 through and inclusive of April 15. Proposed management efforts shall include (but not limited to) provisions for the use of vegetative filtering enhanced by creek bed reconstruction, preparation of detailed erosion control plans, appropriate use of temporary debris basins, silt fences, sediment traps and other erosion control practices. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements and recommendations for the use of best available technology. The erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. Sediment yields in the watersheds within the project boundary shall be computed for pre - development and post- development conditions in accord with methods outlined in Erosion and Sediment Yields in the Transverse Ranges, Southern California (United States Geological Survey, 1978). These estimates of sediment yield shall be completed prior to initiating final design of the debris /detention basin facilities situated in the downstream portion of the project. 45. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the project Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as deemed necessary: a. Minimize removal of existing vegetation. b. Provide temporary soil cover, such as hydroseeding, jute blankets, mulch /binder and erosion control blankets, to protect exposed soil from wind and rain. C. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C,n n n .+e- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 22 e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale, earth, and sandbag dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure during the October through April rainy season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. 46. To minimize the water quality effects of permanent erosion sources, the following design features shall be incorporated into the project - grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading plan to verify compliance with Best Management Practices features including, but not limited to the following: a. Drainage swales, subsurface drains, slope drains, storm drain inlet /outlet protection, and sediment traps. b. Check dams to reduce flow velocities. C. Permanent desilting basins. d. Permanent vegetation, including grass -lined swales. e. Design of drainage courses and storm drain outlets to reduce scour. 47. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented during all construction activities throughout build out of the project to minimize the impacts of project- related noise in the vicinity of the proposed project site: a. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services and may be further restricted or prohibited should be City receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays and City observed holidays pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. b. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes that avoid S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02,C`'b 111" �* ^tl� vo. b v5 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 23 residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. C. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. d. Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. e. Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise shielded from existing surrounding rural residential neighborhoods. f. Property owners and residents located within 600 feet of the project site, shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The project developer shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Department. g. A construction effects mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the City after completion and occupancy of the first phase of project build out. This program shall protect, to the degree feasible, new residents from the impacts of sustained construction. 48. The project shall be subdivided by a single final map. Grading and improvements shall be designed, bonded and constructed as a single project. 49. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 A-,. ^ ^ wr �, .t RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 24 the approved Tentative Map, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 50. The final grading plan shall meet all UBC and City of Moorpark standards including slope setback requirements at lot lines, streets and adjacent to offsite lots. 51. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a sediment and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 52. This project is projected to import soils onsite. Import /export operations requiring an excess of 100 total truckloads or 1,000 cubic yards of material shall require City Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route is to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets shall be required as directed by the City Engineer. Approval of the Haul Route Permit shall require the following: a. The haul route permit application shall be completed in its entirety including information indicating maximum quantity of dirt to be hauled. The haul shall be conducted only as permitted and no soil shall be transported to or from any site, via any route, during any time, or by any means except as specified in the permit. b. If import is coming from the east, the haul trucks shall enter the City from State Route 23 freeway and New Los Angeles Avenue interchange and proceed westerly to Flory Avenue, thence northerly along Flory Avenue to "A" Street, thence into the site. Empty haul trucks shall proceed northerly on Flory Avenue to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 n n n►- v .. ,, RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 25 Third Street, thence westerly to Moorpark Avenue (State Route 23) and southerly to Los Angeles Avenue. If the haul is from the west, the haul trucks shall enter the City from Los Angeles Avenue and proceed easterly to Moorpark Avenue, thence northerly on Moorpark Avenue to Third Street, thence easterly on Third Street to Flory Avenue, thence southerly along Flory Avenue to "A" Street, thence into the site. Empty haul trucks shall proceed southerly on Flory Avenue to Los Angeles Avenue. At the time of the haul route permit, the City Engineer and Community Development Director may approve a revised route plan, including but not limited to a Millard Street access through the property directly east of Tract 5307, if construction on both sites is concurrent. C. The haul route permit application shall indicate the name of the dirt hauling company; the contractor's state license number; the contractor's City license number; proof of insurance per the City's requirements; the supervisor in charge, including work address, daytime work telephone numbers, a 24 -hour availability number and the number of days to complete the haul. d. The haul route permit application shall specify the starting and completion dates. No changes to the approved haul route, times and dates of operation, dust control, signage or traffic control shall be made without approval of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. e. The Developer shall procure a City Encroachment permit and post a cash bond in the amount of $500 per day for each day of operations approved by the City Engineer. The deposit shall be for payment of any costs incurred by the City related to the haul including but not necessarily limited to damage remediation, street cleaning, administration, inspection and monitoring of the permit. Upon certification by the City Engineer that the haul operation is completed and that, all damages to the City facilities and all costs to the City and its agents and contractors have been paid; the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v , .� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 26 Should the costs to the City exceed the deposit amount, the Developer hauling the soil shall cease all work operations and deposit additional funds with the City, in an amount determined by the City Engineer, within 10 days of written demand by the City. f. The haul permit shall be subject to revocation or revisions by the City Council or the City Engineer. A copy of the permit shall be available for review on the site at all times. The truck trip counts and yardage hauled shall be tallied as the trucks enter the import site. A true copy of the tally sheets shall be delivered to the City Engineer, or his /her designee, at the end of each working day that the hauling occurs. g. The haul operation shall provide traffic control to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Hauling operations shall be conducted only on weekdays (Monday through Friday) and during daylight hours and only between the hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM on school days and between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM on non - school days (school holidays). i. Appropriate traffic warning signs and devices and a flagger shall be provided at the entrances to the public way. The flagging operation shall be directed to controlling the entrance of the trucks used to haul the soil on and off the public street. Disruption of traffic on public streets due to the haul operation shall be reduced to the maximum extent practical. j. All portions of the haul route and intersecting streets within 500 feet of the haul route shall be swept continuously during haul operations. No less than two street sweepers shall be in operation over the portions of the haul route within City jurisdiction during haul operations and for 30 minutes after the haul operation hours. k. Haul operations shall be suspended on rain days. The suspension shall continue until soils on the import site have dried sufficiently that the haul truck tires do not pick up the soils. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var n A"..,- „► -y,r) Calmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C %-” � ti,• �.o RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 27 1. The soil shall be wetted to optimum moisture (ASTM D- 1557) before loading. Each haul truck shall have all soil cleared from surfaces outside the bed before traveling on a public street. The tires of the haul trucks shall be cleaned of adhering soil before traveling on any public street. The soil may be covered by tarps during the haul as an alternative to wetting the soil to optimum moisture. M. Onsite haul routes and soil moisture conditioning measures shall be such to eliminate tracking or blowing soil onto City streets or adjoining property from the loading, hauling, dumping or distributing portions of the operation. Onsite operations shall be coordinated to avoid passage of haul trucks over wet soils that might adhere to the tires of the haul units. n. The haul permit shall be signed by both the hauling company and the Developer and shall bind both to the conditions of the permit. 53. The entire subdivision shall be graded in a single operation. 54. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to a temporary or permanent grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days except that during the rainy season these measures will be implemented immediately. 55. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are warranted a certified soil engineer will review plans and their recommendations will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. 56. All graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v ti. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 28 and minimize erosion. The planting will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 57. So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The Developer shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. The City Engineer and Community Development Director shall approve all material for the construction of the wall. 58. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 1st to April 15th subject to approval by the City Engineer and timely installation of erosion control facilities. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 1st and April 15th. In order to comply with the October 1st date, revised erosion control plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer no later than September 1st of each year from the start of grading or clearing operations to the time of grading bond release. 59. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits will be provided to the City Engineer. 60. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the .project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. 61. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations regular watering shall control dust. In addition the following measures shall apply: a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 e" 'r C •✓ . .� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 29 of water trucks that will be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. C. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. e. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. f. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 62. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: a. Apply non - hazardous chemical stabilizers to all inactive portions of the construction site. When appropriate, seed exposed surfaces with a fast growing, soil binding plant to reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.), which may have accumulated from construction activities. 63. During smog season (May - October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 30 64. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Engineer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 65. The Developer shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including- installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 66. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4 -inch fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 67. Soil testing for trench compaction shall be performed on all trenching and shall be done not less than once every 2 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated. Test locations shall be noted using street stationing with offsets from street centerlines. 68. Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the construction area. 69. During site preparation and construction, construct temporary storm water diversion structures per City of Moorpark standards. 70. The entire site shall be graded at the same time. Pads shall be graded, planted and landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Geotechnical /Geological Conditions: 71. Prior to submittal of grading plans the Developer shall have a geotechnical report prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and at the minimum the geotechnical report shall address the following: a. All grading, foundations and structures shall be designed and constructed to comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and applicable City and /or Country Grading Ordinances. Modifications to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 P, r,, ►q�- RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 31 these standards shall be permitted only with the written concurrence of the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. b. An engineering geologist shall define the final grading requirements for residential facilities. All geological recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the City's consulting geologist. Foundation designs in areas where fault traces may be identified that are deemed inactive should address enhancing the stability of homes in the event minor movement occurs as a secondary effect of ground shaking. C. The developer shall cause an engineering geologist to study all unanticipated faults exposed during grading to detect any evidence of possible recent activity. All active fault lines will be clearly shown on the grading plan and final map. No structure shall be placed within 50 feet of any fault trace. d. All habitable structures shall be designed to accommodate structural impacts from 0.12g- ground acceleration or other standard factor of safety deemed applicable to this project. The standards shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. The developer shall contract with an engineering geologist to conduct geotechnical investigations and to prepare grading recommendations, foundation design criteria, and other recommendations regarding detailed project design. The soils engineer shall evaluate the condition of alluvium, liquefaction, expansive soils, seismic safety and unconsolidated soils. The soils report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. Should the need for additional geotechnical studies be generated or required as a result of the geotechnical investigation, additional plan check fees will be required. Relatively loose soils or alluvium shall be densified or removed and recompacted prior to placement of structures upon such soils. Other mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 pf� ra r� n ►�y�n C. . �i RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 32 final project design as required by the geological assessment. All geological recommendations shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Grading permits shall not be issued until 40 scale grading plans have been approved. The project shall be constructed in accord with the approved grading plans. g. Review of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, by the City's Geotechnical Engineer, is required. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all cost including the City's administrative fee for this review. h. All recommendations included in the approved Geotechnical Engineering Report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soil engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the Developer's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved soil report(s). 72. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. 73. Prior to issuance of a building permit,. an as- graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. Street Conditions: 74. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall provide for a surveyor's statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 „n r, IN 0-1 vvv r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 33 75. Monuments shall meet the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura Standards and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mitigation of Traffic Impacts: 76. Traffic System Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential _unit, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund of $1,444.00 per residential unit to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. Commencing on January 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 77. Prior to the first Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, Developer shall pay a fair -share contribution for intersection improvements for Poindexter Road /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Moorpark Avenue, Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road and Spring Road /High Street. The level of fair -share participation will be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer based on the traffic report prepared for the project and the extent of the impact to these intersections. 78. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit, Developer shall pay City a traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by the City in its sole and unfettered discretion. On the effective date of approval of the tentative subdivision map, the amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be $4,240 per S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02' -�''�yy Cv v. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 34 dwelling unit. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 79. The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. Street Requirements: Los Angeles Avenue 80. The Developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate for street purposes all the property south of the north property line wall to the satisfaction of City and Caltrans for Los Angeles Avenue street improvements to be constructed as a Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) fee improvement project. The amount of property needed for the right -of -way for Los Angeles Avenue and the location of the sidewalk shall be as determined by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. The Developer shall be required to install landscaping south of the property line wall in the area not required for street improvements and sidewalk. Landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue shall be shown on the landscape plan to be approved by the Community Development Director. If approved by the Community Development Director, City Engineer and Caltrans, the sidewalk width may be reduced to six (6) feet if determined necessary to achieve adequate landscape area adjacent to the southerly property line wall. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 v r. v 9 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 35 81. Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements and shall be safe and visible from vehicle and pedestrian traffic along Los Angeles Avenue. 82. The Developer shall dedicate vehicular access rights to the City of Moorpark along Los Angeles Avenue on the final map. 83. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from Caltrans prior to construction of any proposed roadway or other improvements within their right -of -way. Any additional right -of -way required to implement the approved design for this work in their right -of -way, including slope easements for future grading, shall be acquired by the applicant and dedicated to the State in a manner acceptable to Caltrans and the City Engineer. All required dedications shall be illustrated on the Final Map. Proof of encroachment or other non -City permits and bonds shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the start of any grading or construction activities. Citv Streets: 84. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to City of Moorpark requirements including all applicable ADA requirements. Street improvements shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 85. All streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision), unless noted otherwise in the Conditions. 86. Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements, shall be safe from vehicular traffic along "A" Street, Flory Avenue, and Los Angeles Avenue. Prior to approval of the improvement plans, Developer shall submit an ADA access exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The exhibit shall denote how ADA access throughout the public right -of -way shall be accomplished. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02"`�"'r, v L' v RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 36 87. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, street lights, and signing, striping, interim striping and traffic control, paving, and any necessary transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer and the Community Development Director shall approve all driveway locations. The Developer shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 88. Entry monumentation that does not- interfere with sight - distance or turning movements shall be incorporated into the project entrance planning at Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. Landscaping shall be provided appropriate to the entry that will not interfere with sight- distance or turning movement operations. The final design for the project entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permits. 89. "A" Street shall be constructed per modified Ventura County Standard Plate B -6 -B, 44 foot right -of -way; containing two 12 -foot wide travel lanes, one 4 -foot wide bike lane, one 8 -foot wide parking lane, and two 3.5 foot wide sidewalks, not including top of curb. "A" Street shall have parking omitted from the north side. "No Stopping" signs shall be placed at each end of "A" Street and at intervals not exceeding 175 feet. A 5 feet wide Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) shall be provided adjacent to the street right -of- way. The maximum grade within the P.U.E. shall be 2 %. Developer shall demonstrate conformance to ADA access requirements at all locations including driveway locations. An ADA plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and help on file to show conformance to those requirements. Improvement plans will detail all locations where utilities or other improvements conflict with normal walk locations. The Final Tract Map and Improvement Plans will reflect all such locations that affect lot lines and right -of -way lines. 90. At the easterly end of "A" Street the Developer shall construct a "hammerhead" turnaround to meet the minimum requirements of the fire department. Improvements shall provide access to the property that bounds the easterly boundary along the turnaround. If necessary, the Developer S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 37 shall procure any additional right of way. The final map and improvement plans shall make provisions for this. Improvements and mapping shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 91. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with the latest APWA Standards. 92. Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes, etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas. When above ground obstructions are to be placed within the sidewalk, a minimum 3.5 feet clear sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction. 93. The Developer shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 94. The Developer shall dedicate vehicular access rights to the City of Moorpark along Flory Avenue. 95. Prior to recordation of final maps, the proposed street name shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review and approval. Approved street names shall be shown on the final map. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F -4 of the Ventura County Road Standards. 96. Prior to approval of the final Tentative Map, the proposed infrastructure plan for the project shall be designed to place all required water, sewer and storm drains in "A" Street from the tract to Millard Street. The applicant shall obtain all necessary right -of -way and easements to install the required infrastructure in this alignment. The City may assist with the acquisition of such easements. 97. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements shall be acquired by the Developer at its expense. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 38 Street Lighting Conditions: 98. Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to final map recordation, the Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. Drainage Requirements: 99. The applicant shall make a pro -rata contribution to the mitigation of cumulative regional drainage deficiencies, should the City adopt such a program prior to issuance of the first building permit. 100. The Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 101. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. 102. The drainage plans and calculations shall relate to conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention and NPDES facilities and drainage courses will be addressed. 103. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Flood Control Standards except as follows: a. All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year frequency storm. b. All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm. c. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. d. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm va Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 39 104. Surface flows shall be intercepted, detained and given sufficient time to provide storm water clarification by "passive" BMP systems prior to entering collector or storm drain systems. 105. Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction. 106. "After- development" drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased above "Pre- development" drainage quantities nor will surface runoff be concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 107. Drainage grates shall not be used at any location accessible by pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian traffic. 108. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels. 109. All flows that have gone through flow attenuation and clarification by use of acceptable BMP systems and are flowing within brow ditches, ribbon gutters, storm drain channels, area drains and similar devices shall be deposited directly into the storm drain system and shall be restricted from entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended to accept these flows. Both storm drains and easements outside the public right -of -way are to be privately maintained unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 110. Concrete surface drainage structures exposed to the public view, shall be tan colored concrete, as approved by the Community Development Director, and to the extent possible shall incorporate natural structure and landscape to reduce their visibility. 111. In order to comply with California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements no curb outlets will be allowed for pad drainage onto the street. The Developer shall inform all new and future homeowners that future improvements such as pool construction or other private improvements require observance of the same requirements. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 40 This notification agreement shall be acknowledged by each homeowner and recorded with each property and enforced by any proposed Homeowners Association. 112. Drainage devices for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 113. A hydraulic /hydrologic study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Developer shall make any downstream improvements, required by the City, to support the proposed development. 114. Improvements shall be constructed to detain drainage on- site when the drainage amount is between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event. A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in the design unless alternate design intensity is approved by the City Engineer. 115. Developer shall improve the storm drain facility immediately adjacent to and east of the site (Fremont Drain) and extend these facilities upstream to Millard Street. In addition, Developer shall provide a hydrology study to determine the Developer's pro -rata share of the cost to construct Fremont Drain (total cost estimated $428,000) based on City of Moorpark Master Plan of Drainage (April 1995). The cost estimate shall be adjusted based on latest Quarterly State Highway Bid Price Index Chart from Engineering News Record, The Construction Weekly magazine. 116. The Developer shall demonstrate, for each building pad within the development area, that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Flood Control Standards. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 41 d. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 117. The Developer shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City Engineer, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site detention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 118. The design of the storm drain system shall provide for adequate width easements for future maintenance and reconstruction of facilities particularly those facilities that are deeper than 8 feet. In addition all facilities shall have all- weather vehicular access. This design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 119. Engineering and geotechnical reports shall be provided to prove, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that all "passive" NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. 120. The Developer shall demonstrate and certify to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that all existing storm drain culverts within the site shall perform in an acceptable manner based on their intended design and the proposed increase /decrease of loading conditions, introduction of surface water within subsurface areas that may affect the culvert and proposed construction. This especially includes cast -in -place concrete pipe (CIPP). National Pollutant Discharqe Elimination System ( NPDES) Requirements: 121. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C.,r •,.. �.. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 42 122. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 123. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system. 124. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." 125. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the Developer shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The Developer shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). 126. The Developer shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The Developer shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI ) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 127. The Developer shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." 128. Prior to Final Map approval, Developer will provide facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (BMP's) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 43 plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the Developer to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 129. Prior to City issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require applicant to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite will not be allowed. 130. The project construction plans shall state that the contractor shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a. All onsite storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump Drains to Arroyo." b. No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. C. All common area property locations shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d. All onsite storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and once in January. e. All common sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from entering the storm drain. f. No cleaning agent must be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the County Waterworks District No. 1. g. The City will require that "passive" devices and BMP's be used to comply with NPDES water quality requirements. The Developer shall provide the City S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 44 with a Maintenance Program for such devices. The CC &R's shall include a requirement that the Developer /HOA shall maintain, in perpetuity, such devices in a manner consistent with specific requirements to be detailed within the Maintenance Program. Alternatively the developer shall provide BMP's conforming to Ventura County Municipal Storm Water NPDES Permit No. CAS004002 to the satisfaction of the - City Engineer. This alternative may require dedicating one lot to satisfy the NPDES provisions. 131. Prior to the starting of grading or any ground disturbance the Developer shall employ a full -time superintendent for NPDES compliance. The NPDES superintendent shall have no other duties than NPDES compliance, shall be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is 40% or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. The NPDES superintendent shall have full authority to hire personnel, bind the developer in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management Practices. The NPDES superintendent shall provide proof to the City Engineer of attendance and satisfactory completion of courses satisfactory to the City Engineer totaling no less than 8 hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of Best Management Practices. Proof of such attendance and completion shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to employment to the NPDES superintendent. In addition, an NPDES superintendent shall be employed to assume NPDES compliance during the construction of streets, storm drainage systems, all utilities, buildings and final landscaping of the site. Acquisition of Easements and Right of Way: 132. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02•s� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 45 filling of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457: a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter City) in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land, which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with: (i)_ a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Following Conditions shall be Satisfied: 133. If directed by the City, the Developer shall have repaired, overlayed or slurried that portion of Flory Avenue and /or Los Angeles Avenue adjacent to the development damaged as a result of project related construction work or utility trenching. The repairs, curb replacement, parkways, sidewalks, and overlay or slurry of the street, as a result of damage from construction work or utility trenching shall be along the entire length of the project including transitions unless otherwise approved and shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 134. A copy of the recorded Map(s) shall be forwarded to the City Engineer for filing. 135. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C v' v RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 46 Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements and Bond Exonerations, the Following Conditions shall be Satisfied: 136. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 137. Sufficient surety in a form and in an amount acceptable to the City guaranpteeing the public improvements shall be provided, and shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. 138. Original "as built" plans shall be certified by the Developer's Registered Civil Engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. These "as built" plans shall incorporate all plan revisions. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they shall be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection is scheduled. Electronic files shall be submitted for all improvement plans in a format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, Developer shall provide an electronic file update on the City's Master Base Map electronic file, incorporating all storm drainage, water and sewer mains, lines and appurtenances and any other utility facility available for this project. D. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 139. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. 140. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 141. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire District access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No..2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 47 142. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. 143. Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 144. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. 145. Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. 146. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 147. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 148. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and one (1) 2 1/2 -inch outlet. b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrants. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 48 e. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, and shall be placed within three (3) feet of any hydrant. f. A contract pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant. g. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches. 149. Prior to - occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 150. Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 151. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current Fire District Ordinance. 152. Plans for all fire sprinkler systems shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. 153. Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. 154. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire District within seven (7) days of recordation of said map. E. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 155. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD.No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 49 c. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. E. VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: 156. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities will be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 157. Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 e-"d'a RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 50 EXHIBIT D CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 AND VARIANCE 2002 -01 A. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: 1. The Residential Planned Development permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. 2. Use Inauguration: Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) one (1) year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the tentative tract map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 3. Other Regulations: The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable regulations of the applicable zone and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 4. Duplication of Conditions: All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occur and applicability for compliance is questioned by the Developer, the Community S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 In w?,- .�+,r' C v a_ w� RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 51 Development Director will determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. 5. Image Conversion of Plans: Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the builder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of building permit plans as determined by the Community Development Director into an electronic imaging format acceptable to the City Clerk. 6. Public Nuisance: The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance." The Applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the conditions of approval or applicable codes. If the Applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). 7. Redevelopment Area Affordable Housing Requirements: To meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code 33410 et seq., as a condition of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Developer shall agree as follows: a. Low Income Units: i. Provide two (2) three (3) bedroom units of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (80% of Median income). The first low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the seventh (7th) market rate unit of the project; and ii. The second low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 52 certificate of occupancy for the eighteenth (18th) market rate unit of the project. b. Very Low Income Unit: Provide one (1) three (3) bedroom unit of not less than 1,138 square feet in size, to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for very low income households established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the County of Ventura (50% of Median income). The very low income unit shall be constructed and a certificate of occupancy shall be issued no later than the construction and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the fifteenth (15th) market rate unit of the project. 8. Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan and Affordable Housing Agreement: The initial sales price, location of the affordable units, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, respective role of the City and the Developer, and any other item determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in an Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the first final Tract Map for this project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with Tract 5307 conditions of approval. 9. Affordable Housing Agreement Preparation Fee: Developer shall pay to City the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) for the City's cost to prepare the required affordable housing plan and agreement. 10. Outstanding Case Processing Costs: The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this RPD Permit. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the RPD Permit. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C .r RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 53 11. Design /Development Standards: Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the building elevations shall be revised to be consistent with the conditions of approval for this Residential Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, subject to Community Development Director approval. 12. All garage doors shall be rollup. A minimum of 20 feet shall be provided in front of each door. 13. Each residence shall maintain the established setbacks for the project as shown on the approved plot plan, except that the minimum setbacks for the main structure are as follows: front yard, 16 feet to the house and 20 feet to the garage; side yard, 5 feet; street side yard, 19 feet; and rear yard, 10 feet. 14. Accessory structures minimum five (5) foot rear yard setback. 15. The Developer shall approved on the land: shall be completed approval. and patio covers shall maintain a side yard setback and ten (10) foot install front yard landscaping as *cape plans. Front yard landscaping for each lot prior to occupancy 16. The Developer shall provide a neighborhood identification monument sign at the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue that reads "Walnut Acres." The final design and location of the sign shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The sign shall be installed concurrent with perimeter wall installation. 17. Changes to Design: The following changes to the building elevations shall be incorporated by the Applicant and new copies of the building elevations submitted to the Community Development Director for approval prior to issuance of a building permit for any homes: a. Additional window treatment shall be provided on all rear second story windows and on the side second story windows on Lots 1, 11 and 22 subject to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. b. The Plan 3 elevations shall be revised to incorporate design elements and materials similar to Plan 1 and S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C. IrNle% .spa ,i .- J RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 54 Plan 2 elevations. These revised elevations shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. C. The footprint for Plan 3 on Lots 1 and 22 shall be reversed so that the front entry is located on the side of the unit that faces Flory Avenue. The driveways for Lots 1 and 22 shall remain on "A" Street; however, a gate and pedestrian access walkway shall be added along Flory Avenue. 18. Adjoining residential units may not have the same floor plan or elevation. 19. Compatibility of Changes to Plans: No expansion, alteration or change in architectural elements that are visible from any abutting street shall be allowed, unless in the judgment of the Community Development Director such change is compatible with all dwellings having frontage on the same street and located within 200 feet (or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director) of the side property line of the structure proposed for expansion or alteration, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director consistent with the approved Design Guidelines and Zoning Code requirements. 20. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within 15 feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than 5 feet of level ground. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed in the sideyard setback area where compliance with these standards can be achieved. 21. Modifications to Permit: All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 22. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of 20 feet in length and 10 feet in width for each parking stall provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var A�)N ^ JF1S4_h5 Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 /l%. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 55 23. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. a. All residential units shall be constructed employing energy saving devices. These devices are to include, but are not limited to the following: Ultra low flush toilets (to not exceed 1.6 gallons); b. Low water use shower controllers as required by Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code shall be placed on all shower facilities; C. Natural gas fueled stoves; ovens and ranges shall not have continuous burning pilot lights; d. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night set back features; e. To ensure closure when not in use kitchen ventilation systems shall have automatic dampers; and 24. Hot water solar panel stub -outs shall be provided. 25. Maintenance of Permit Area: The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee or owner shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within five (5) days after notification. 26. Phasing: Construction phasing shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The Director shall avoid to the extent possible any impacts to existing residential areas from construction traffic. 27. Submittal of Construction Drawings: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 C RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 56 28. Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee: As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit within the boundaries of the Tract Map, Developer shall pay City at the time of issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, a traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by City in its sole and unfettered discretion. The amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be $4,240.00 per residential unit. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 29. Fish and Game Fee Requirement: Within two (2) days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089; and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 30. Miscellaneous Fees: Applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, Applicant is subject to all fees imposed by City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 5: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 „� n,_ RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 57 31. Traffic System Management Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential unit, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund of $1,444.00 per residential unit to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. Commencing on January 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 32. Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee: The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. 33. Park and Recreational Facilities (Quimby) Fee: Prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, the subdivider shall pay fees in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). The fee for the three affordable units shall be $4,000 per dwelling unit. The fee for the market rate units shall be determined based on Subdivision Ordinance requirements. 34. Cable Television: During construction, Developer shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 -N 0-�) RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 58 all parcels and lots in the Project. Developer shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide Developer a list of Cable Franchisees upon Developer's request. 35. In the event the cable television services or their equivalent are provided to the Project or individual lots under collective arrangement or any collective means other than a Cable Franchisee (including, but not limited to, programming provided over a wireless or satellite system contained within the Project), the HOA shall pay monthly to City an access fee of five percent (5%) of gross revenue generated by the provision of those services, or the highest franchise fee required from any City Cable Franchisee, whichever is greater. "Gross revenue" is as defined in Chapter 5.06 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and any successor amendment or supplementary provision thereto. B. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS: 36. The City Engineering conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5307 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01. C. VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 37. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 -ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. 38. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 39. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire Department access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. 40. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 59 41. Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 42. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. 43. Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structure(s) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. 44. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 45. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 46. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works Manual. 47. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one (1) 4 inch and one (1) 2 1/2 -inch outlet. 48. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20psi residual pressure. 49. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrant. 50. Fire hydrants shall be set back from the curb face 24 inches on center. 51. No obstructions, including walls, trees, light and sign posts, meter, and shall be placed within three ( 3 ) feet of any hydrant. S: \Community Development\ Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 60 52. A contract pad shall be installed extending 18 inches out from the fire hydrant. 53. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between 18 to 24 inches. 54. Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 55. Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 56. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current Fire District Ordinance. 57. Plans for all fire sprinkler systems shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. 58. Applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire District for review and approval prior to construction. 59. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire Prevention Division within seven (7) days of recordation of said map. D. VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITIONS: 60. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall provide Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. C. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 61 d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. E. VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CONDITIONS: 61. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities will be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 62. Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. F. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 63. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. G. MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITION: 64. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 /^ , , A — z RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 62 H. BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 65. The final grading plan shall meet all standards of the Uniform Building Code (UBC). 66. Spark Arrestor: An approved spark arrestor shall be installed on the chimney of any structure(s). I. MITIGATION MEASURE CONDITIONS: 67. Prior to submittal of building plans, Applicant shall provide an acoustical study report to the City of Moorpark that outlines a program for implementation of the Noise Element Standard of 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) to be attained at all locations within the development. The City also requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior noise sources not exceed 45 CNEL. The intent of the interior noise level criterion is to provide an acceptable noise level for communication and sleep. 68. A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 69. The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 70. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8- inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8- inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 71. All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �"'' A nr`j RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2002 -422 GPA 2001 -01, TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 63 72. All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Building and Safety Office will provide a memorandum to the Community Development Director verifying that the building permit plans comply with all noise mitigation measures imposed as conditions of approval. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 422 conds gpa zc rpd ttm var Colmer rev2.doc Modified: 04/25/02 �*� z __z iFLORYAVENUE '4 `MILLARDSTREET TYpCAL STREET SECTIONS TYPICAL STREET SECTION. � .M20[v[t.iMn•r•Ti•trAtPtI F[nPOOM U . Sill Y•.T CJYNN MT [. l UTO— � 1 11' RPI2TD M[M•M �O[Ut N O2W 1t n, ?L ioT AREA TAtuunon LOX NO MLA 15Q.FT.1 j gut Hn 1 Hit 1 ) 11 1 Jm HN Hi. 11 TC5 ' 2t J O 1 Jn 11 )ut )ae 1, Hl[ HE Ni HN Hee SECTION A•A LOS ANGELES AVENUE TYPICAL STREET SECTION I- raaECTsrrw, I ' �r'. M. AYL "l.JtAlnetMr RTft[tTtr TTtO110ML. OTaV a'OOTIIA ��1 �(jtHS. wA, — r7FItR1�AP0.MtTtR�.V 510— �� M Il_. —JIO.. -tar Allat++:,vt.: A,L .'STIREET � � .� Miliurvr• SCALE I l0 A;OCATOf1:'+1AP FIORIi 1 V[nT CAL nTa; TYPICALSTRZx 49ST10[!: SECTION Q'B t[ rXLt«�cp r tR E MtottPi �l/10l�EDSf�pAP R5CHOOL a 4RNY alr i'otoi uo I. 6 , L,':pR'�at",RbC1�. ".' t - .. 5 r .� • I y , b uN1TJl.,'sic�.opglnt�fa°O x I y prhit:♦atPY � � :.� h � _ _ _ ='3 — _ _ _ _ ♦ I 'w ',S � � • 56 f�.• I 14 '•Rt•. s5 ca c :., rl 1 asse� i r LZ'r�� lI I I , S` ;a5, = 19< •�, �2 � � I t LI 1 1 Q. .1 _ - 1_NlwOitFRM►MtM— �. �"- —_- Ss "1 .._. .*_ �`'!- fi�i�i'' _- .�'Lt.'r'PaL[c�r'str,.ac:T"♦' Y.: T �--- •,:2.2>����r �,r� ; t1f� 1 I J i . Lkc Ir •," r o- .tc I� )•! .i b q F ( �f _. LB ,! 'g �` ',.t .. i i I v.lf.. tGEi+BpALNOTEi': •.. I � T�TL� *-< �� '_ � / tll';; 'i - •�: I I:aOSR ARIA IN:[H 5V•r2. . 2.1.1 'Afl:.'.. 7i%'M�42YLI1.± ..�y AAFA OF LOT! NS.YSf'iMLN.{WtCR.I .. I -1_ a, ... L.A. ,W. WOPJONO 3,750 4/': rf.. r . n .. ,,:.: _. .-•" - _ _ _ _ V � r}- XT.r,f1.:' f Aks:ro.';,,> 'r. R�., wry•, °3� 'Ri.- � ..�.. LIB t':1�1 1�1_wwN l 1- i tri YCb 011, J r r ? ^r r r fy11W0� '�° C ,7. r #.,,1 ,.eT•i:�9 s w �1:� i, J � � �'!�T, F �. Tx?! �, £ ys a ���� 11. AfTRLLT '—.TO IbmFoR GCt'IDT. , .. 01. s i T + )//at6T f Y yJ Ct J�yNMIiU�'�T ', LATtA. 0 TAtp MITII t1fACYLOGAT1oN T0 tt OtTRfl+IprD , � -. .. ... .... PA 'K" ' ."�'�Ml� •.... .. "Ey+fi, t ,n.A ».,,.e ,.. r....o ............. n.,,,....'A ,,,.» � ��. $ a' {,♦'7an... :. :. r � tNi , tT tt ..; - . _ -X. _ _ __ '— ___— r .�, y LJ a M �'3,a°i'e+l •s, ' -iLJ �K ��m ?.i 3� } 7 • tr rt c :: > � s,a, �y y ' t:�; . � +k . `� y -_.. _- ___ —__... _ —_.. —. 5 E.:�7Fr t �htlft5?Ffy�' $'�J' .MJ. ,♦� Y Lx v r..a' -:. ,kyJC 1'' �.''�� J -;�.. frt+�): r � :. ii'r r;�. , ATTACHMENT3A. A n: IL .36 c _C, Cnom 4 mcnori 13-B Li- ------ r J stcn&4 D� L > -0 < CC FLAN, 4 it, PLAN 1A A. PA. u,.c PLA,?! 4 -4- :A a .PLAN PA. 111, FAI FAj A. 14 % -A .14 \J 71 U L STRUT -7 f I;x 101/ .451 A A L Is PLA �rL" 2A 0 IA. -.1 r f1 P Ir A PLAN le), 4_0-. -A 7 3� LA OSCAft L A�Pi A 1H AVk., LO M NGEIES - .. .. .. - ---- e ------- ------- -- ----------- ----------------- 7 N(_ -ILO -4, LEG -A" STREE 0 r� fpm 3 4 LOCA"on ALAI 11 Rlft 1r, C11A11m'Aiiwm t 1LA141 I ..ftur, 1_ 4 ,I[W"w tV - ..ms~ - axm_� w mhwx..- .bo Muruww b,YMOt,NUwORAwMOw, Aare, H� :AA 3 r� fpm 3 4 LOCA"on ALAI 1LA141 I ILA" I -A-! wWor SECTION. AA, _dA PLOT Pf AN L` COWIR ftnLOYMun Co� "VARXWAYCALAWAS..� INC. v CAIA.AAAS CA. 9CM. r� fpm 5-4 p - PROJECT SITE x —� fID[W4k g 9 y1• L �+ � -- � It I em[wAU R�,1 IS I I ]t� SIO— _c.orA s c �—'___ -_ y..r' g � . �_�-- __ -•cumR '� safwASN R[uwlNG wiu / y eI¢.MAx A_r. AStMrvr rD•LUCTaIC T[u.RNN "[ c •L[n.u.umrt rn[n IAGIIR G.A[ SCAR 1'x•10 PLORY AVENUE. - MILLARU STREET SECTION F'F _ _,__,_ [ Wr. NDaNUrAwwAtD[M[na SECTION Q -B -�y .NCava.ra TYPICAL STREET SECTION, TYPICAL STREET SECTION "A5f STREET W y ..S LOCATION MAP TYPICAL STREET SECTION n r : uii NTS -- • G — �� ' �_- I' 3• wOMl�r gmmw W '•'I 1 >' I Jij •a - / x0101 wALLd A•NP1110N ... - 1 "I F2r . i_ 1 n nM-IY— O MIDI +n I ir�_awiir'r " _� . e" °Y la F wN e .D,,. n IDO w J � aqPT ILAIN O YM. • IOr '.. I � I / I 'III,'., '. I E �1c., ° �° i ,. T ® I:, ir6"zi Sy gg S 8 : i _ Z �I FR p LDT4 gf tXt.. Ii I I � 'I l im K ii Dour •NTro [ Cg 8 . - 1 _ �; 3r I p I Mill I MOQ RPARk LEMN tlkli FARM SCHOOL SECTON A-A RY SCHOOL L LOS ANGELES AVENUE u Y , l 1 _ It k. IYPICALJ'TREETSECTION I r o[ as sNr : A E �_ yI( k w LOT Ii � sd ' w _ - 1IT. -T R s'''�"f Tc° I 10 [ se VND :tn,:MFL j nan,ln sni 1 r. .1:.1 1 ,r• 1 5�1 °� �Iw �I ... T T „6 Ma .. `, 1 I� •; I ''�� 1[..[ �� k �. O'1r 22 20 14 for 12 ri �`r. a r 21+" r , 19 1185 i 13 y 111 G'. II`1 17 16 1 a r.r w�.'. r V' I ;, � .;: � 1 't-nl s �rt -t(rM111i Ttitiyri • y c -... a -atrn_ 1 a .+ r s x I, N it N'.uttT„ N ' I ggg n _ 1•wtNY YtrAwnp WAW1 S961014 S961014 C-C'. i V `r�l - IOrr _ '� ' ey0Rr 0I w•WYARP•1.0r 1 N.il.' } � S/ TD AD AIaM [rARfRDP[Rn Lr'• I! YN.a° la I — "- Wj'`{ '- r}{i ��; I t [CT. noT.naM ?. � y- [r-- ^-eA -• a- r-- �inrT6 -TTF�A+TP 1'R —� �� - Sg LION &Ec 'N s 1901 I 0. ,; 1 a 1 1....f Ie [191.5 FL JIL• .,p f1 [l N! 1 / y� j I• i0 AMP• [ � It .r • i' n wr4+� g xr. IRA C a a 1J- � I• I uqq;l - I r CI t. :. y SDI b f C1 F. L. �. DrcA i J 3 6 7 8 Ir.•'SECTION D-D I _ I n l� y [ 4 r e5 A } ;n e F d �:t L'1 i +r y 1Ln.r i.a 4i%! P SJain.a YYY 1 r CENERALNOTES: N.TS... I l : 1 ! ,. ) aaf '• IN .. - ` + aD 1 I ._...._WAP_T °_�rrtvcr- i �- _ - -- I. GROSS AREA - IN,19550.7. .1..•I ACS. _ _ ___ __ -� 'q.a A _: -: t �i 1L9RTIRAI'•GATDATT - _. •[n'lDODNa4M AN9AUF LOTS - 19,nT �- "A•STXEET AREA - 22.1.1 ! i ,30 y..D / MMN IrkAr tOrwx nT.. •�11 I i� 1� I.. A. AVE. WFDENMO- 1.116 NOTI, ALLIT•ADIAC[Ni [TR[tl DtDICATION - - —' _ 1G rnLAAEA Iw "' A "A -AMa II. ADDTUNAL 50a 1.T '.. ,.`_ 5�- " �ED71XCTTy _ w.�„�� s o•�— 3�f"- _ _ _ _ 1. LOTAIII..S SECIATARCATAIULATIORMCON - - -"-- '- -- - _ _ ANGELES AVE. J. L=TING ZONING: R4, PROroSLD ZONING; RPp \. yVP - - .I c6RLYAL N07ES: 'GRAdNG ORDER NO. lM11fa DARpJnNIL. LAtiVW6 {IL .e ,•AY Wh - -r �fN .. ALL PNOFO•LD DPILN /IONS AM [MOWN HEREON. 506 5. PR /.LMINARY TRLEIILPORt PRVARLp rY LAWYERS TfTLI CO. L ALL FROPDYp RpIOVF•mRiRAgWxRDCMRALL - rrpPSwaYA1Pw [an to oANDt/r lawlocla ...:. 1 TENTATiVET AICYJ�— -`rte —_ SOUTR[RN CALIIORMM RDIIOX W[M[Nffi u•xr•,vxv, ru[,.fa n r.Ma•b. 1roc.r. -- '" NO.SUJ SINGLE UTILITY COMPANIES FNfiffir SR d' AND e'X 15'EAe[MINT[PIA ORm 16055, e•[AIMENT LOCATED r4M0rle••NMfAw CYM 1405..• _ _ --- FAMILY DETACHED •' W'LY DFIn.Y,DRY. FIX OR —it.,. rrrL•AYaO[rRRWa � } ay_ ' -- TRACTN0.3537 -3 FAMILY DETAC rillL[TV NI[,OI DE /lLpMCM WN51tT.wTa,WG. tWTW.c[ �IDa��r�({• ,: .. r "' MMR 107 V[NoRi at .�AEE Ep.p nafEf A TOPOGMPBIC rVIIVLY PRCFARCD BY DIGITAL MAPPING. INC Mp1�'101101'a .,,_^" .. _. +.. .... ....__...- .... .. TELLP n0A0W nm vA .G -[Mar SDru[.roat ILIn.' I MAN AriN: JWEFNto1y1 FROM AEMAL IMOTOGR "DATID Till• - + -.... _MULTI - FAMILY UNITS L. .:•car•ruWUrl•s ANr.tD Ern ,_.. ._ ....- XaD •ao-Ma. 1. AINUFORI PARCXL NO., PORTION OF 511.116 l' PWIPa1pN TOGRADi AIOIIG N'LYrWY.A QORAW[0. ) I {[GIRT, g CALIFORNIA CD: OW G I. ALL PROPO I/D WPROVCMCH'M& VNFRATTRUCNRE ARI x1010P .RA1oCe0IYCYFLLFARmn"MGRLL•WPPLK l.i T�'*M���./J�(�r������� �_..u:.un.. ._.. 140R MA•Ta[[.[M+SN °j- SEanC DEM[NTrn INION FULwD1ARY Arm SUIULCT TO CHANGE IN DEIGN. •�•LL FpTtIp1A/lY OAT/p •R40L : ' t I A,•../i�L.i iv�ia .' � ' OAR: yRCp XaADIVI` L t a. ..9 GRADING •URAINAO / CO."MAL PLANS row GRADING, c A ai@'°'° ^'°"°R°'' ""°'r•r't°''I5c1°° I li. [ Nn EARTRWOM OVANrfrp• AND DRAINAGE DCVICLa •LM0• ®' - I - 1[DN ywjM G 'aaMO �r'h'V eni•fra t. IR.ORAIaAOC CON[PIIIAL FLLIr roaFrwAarriMlcu - 1 eEweS. v �Nw.counY TsNwDAa ooT I 11. ALL 1 06TIN0 STRUCNRtI ,PAVING, /ACDSTIa, ETC. TO rL 1 t �1� `al'r� 15MWNftI :VON POAD RCMOV[D. NOTE. �•rrNUfarN R[ronvrl AW.1[v. fINfA11r[ �WAt[R A wNArr[AV ArN aarou 1'217 IfC.AL D_ Sr'n� IPnO::: - MooRFARrL CA non OWNER AIFROIDU16Yfl1 A. Ww0. I[,LL Mrrlov[MrXT . ! •• • ^•' ^n r,r , OFMOit OIr..CGM1ANDrAKMRA.LTrVAO CAL,INTIR CITY 1•ep AAwM. MOORIM In[DK000LOmfM[T 11. ASTR/.ET iREL TO $I. PNOVNEO FOR EACH LOT. LOCATION WII.1. - FIANI WpL ILryMARANF DPOCIAM.ItA OF MOORPARF:,COVNTY OF VANTVRA STATC OI C.U.DORNW, ORPAAn.. . TMEPNOME: PACrt rnL MDO•IA•rLCA.nNI "E IN FRONT YARD WITH EXACT LOCATION TO BE U[TCRMIMFD - - - - MAPNWO'Of iAOpVARR rURDNTEION ,RAN[RO SPIT. Erb WARp."I 1x> IMD+•.1r `A'E CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN! M.R U. 1, PG. IA O /flCbLRLC011M. .ep aA LEV,GnoM I[D17 40YIMa 1ne1x .ha •Ornsp 555...5 rwr . w..1r.+ SN[[T TITLE CITY OF MOORPARK - SHEET. NO •r.W wvn40 .. an.., nri -• +5r, i+ ibr Lr COLMER DLVELOPMENT CO. & D V ILL ENCTi'IEER1i'iC/ Ff!'l A "WpA.RMWAYCALASASAS &DEVELOPHIENT ,M,TE „5 TENTATIVE TRACT NO 5307 COr1svLTANrs,nac, CALADASASCA.91392 FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE PLANr^NO • ENGINraRINO • D /YILOFMENT . / rua MDRna[ar.roDLMRtuswlr .ram f>r•w lop 3 WEETr ATTACHMENT 3 C.' ' Sr..M«w '. DI >I✓ >l1w AbA fYGPIrF J N — ! I i�'�i•cr -r. -'t P. _n.# r iLLQl 'A:�10.1i i BROJECT9R4 t§L- TYA'AT PLAN ) . •, �.,A,,, SECT.A•A IYP11 A PMN Mr. • . tnRM • ,•M.1. nxcn2 72,10- • SECT uP�e,� ld7 l�R.����{��' 9. —ta ANCr1Ae•n • •• SECT ION Q'B "oRrz.Lva rcAa. .0 nuvr�ron.srn p. T D Ab .. \ rr r. se K c r "A" STREET M1.F • [• 1 I I L_ A.. 7N T.M N. r,R RMR L• _ _ _ _• J . ) c bIME >In. !. D. Anon Ma TYPICAL SIRE SECTION UC C $ B Ma • - P :F? ,T•L1 •yam /C cr _!L NeP A TPnn PB '1 rrP.i1LT.1070)tA /NA A..., t Mpnfm.DeX. �s� Ndr 7v sc*Lr rrMrranw✓1 :n `T n�:: f ` I r I; 1 ! ' I I - � 5 .. I I. r•.v °'�- _ s -may for 4 A- I I I'' I II i i _.. .. y) •'. J :'.,/ .•n W n r .. PSeP. YA A'CP I - .I •1 1 �/ v } i1 . .. ,gill �. a�rfrLJf... SP.HN S'•0.11 g yy rE c ■ n ® I I MOQRPARK UNION EI.Fh{ENO'AA SCROOL I _7 "_15_ I.lr 1IWWWW . a � ` • ' 9„ --a Lot > � %t _ _. D •II $ E C. �T.jAl -. - M I ? 5I 1 yy ' a � � __E� O - � Ph \ P • I f � 1 f . l C � J O �I e7 t iI I l o iF I I 1 k dro 11 �(1 ,w n/ R ,•/Lh, , I► ' G t J RRIUI B LM - D'� c, 1r. tT� '. e j V [ Ii 1 .' E �i Y.. 7 h $ p { . a+v l 11`4I �0 �ARY)) SEC y I , t OOf M I L LOS ANGELES A VENUE TYPICAL STREET SECTION J I 1 I~ C \ 1 1 AI I �}I tt��� lr< 5z a; T N.=. n.MRrt MIA ire gpE 22 1 7 16 IS 1 I 11 13 1 1 �- ... a '.fa Y � gig E :.. rypDel oAI 1yQi n.NUO est•aMC "ul� 81�na »X — 1 -- YII(:.Tp1.•4'I•rM100N N•• n >)1 r Lc)', r I j O r � Jl aIr' f +r.A.o•1.Y,eu•.nD..mLM{ A. e>t rr •A(/'-^^ t . A En naT n•✓ Peen. I i 1•r f �a _1+ Y '•�S - s G A>a TAlL wI •�A ��r. 1 T �'• ! 11 •!:" f510h w L �Ij. _ SECTION EE {1J -= ,N.TS ' I I 1 A.r,. 1 a rr[.t {I. Er[f [• )N+ t•TE r1 .aB kS S 3N 1. fps TCAIir I• In 1 Oel I C HY�R0006 /C GUTA a '.- n ail rcm A 11.��, D r d ep SwFA.A t y MS.R1 /A A'Ai Lwe. , XPDES 610 %Mr[A _ •'. A 3A " `CN of I'.Ii R a.r +r.✓ A.rw L., T1 AN. I Et} �r :�. L�, RAF✓ to ZewV -K I i '/ •. 3' 9 )) 1 er! S.va NVna.R • 7 AA Ar CY Lr+ .� S S ' 10 ' 2 3 S 6 7 n If. A[sa uedc so Y <. (rYnr) ,1 B yt A s r PfE A'RE a'e EAGY' 'k RSh t 1 f L t f f t o 1. !n! t ' F f s E.. aF r S-tA•or Qf. Na. .). i. t. n{ 'I AT w9S r. r. 4RA B J .)... .r I r �. QEN fat ). s6uf Dtr•n PBFYf t A f 5 5 a ) rn n A[' { TISCI}StET I/ - �' s (nR r1v BB1 -or GLNERAL NOTES: F1NM 2.✓.. -C :: 1_ i• J . f I• • .. .. .nr _ r+.. - r -. �'•saa'rr.� T -ol -e4 1. GRON ARIA + IM,TN EO.». • l.Nl ACE. --- a• If _.. ♦ .. r1[NCiRt„"IL ,- T_ ARFA OF LOTS - Mop, i . VIDDIDNI ) - •A•R1L 1115 LA - . — — AE >E MOTE. AL.tMNTnE _N,ANM TOTAR- S,5 .. AILL•.1Mlar. ADOQIORAL 1oe.Jr .. 9• ✓.. '- L�- T[*AOr� leo.__._ -ti..° _. .,,-- .�-, -• -- 1. LOT Aftw $at LOT AREA I;A TION RERLOn AM axa_ -s r_ A E1Oa1MO l[Mp{Gr R -11 PROPOSED 7DNOIGI RFD .. ANGEL>SS GENLRALNOTES: GRADING - —r- 1 ALL PROPOSED DM{NLIONE ARE 8110" 011LON. .16 10t A FII[IAIMARYTRIl REPORT FE[FAALO AT I:AtrY11311ruco. 1 MlraOFMIm O[rROrrlVMa•DpaAT[ROLTVY •M �..: •> ..__ •.� �`�� ,._ DAD[R XO. ]aa1NA DA7[D }Va.l LAA[MlMI E, II'xa ", t 'xll', f"aut D"rt�1.u�.D. Ur A.MoO . oaNM1 Yn•D[aYR..4.>1.° a1 Tf.MRA.NNO.x . E.1 a tM{ AL paE1CR afM).Oi .t 1 ' - .. .. #-• .. . -- I I . ___ - - 1r,1 TOE ON . D SO)AMJTR] I1VYEM�mL ► c TLil �rCA14I.TJ+Y T� Y , -_ CVMOIAAUPtA�NN I"y E LB L tAR i9WOR �01•NfTLT WtTR[RN CALIFORNIA EDWIN M11NMr Y [AfMaNT LOCATEn AFm x 1] LAaW [Mn KA Oa 1• M•LY OF MY Day. RR OR eaMl)M. TRACTNO.3537 -3 TACKS li LarMr O" ��1Ct OU_ f pIyP. IN NYFEXFS R! /cs xtYa. WO. Ort nex I.•Neet'iM•1rrx. L L.' , FIMR1EM Elm xOADJ [rpOlj%OFMf.G ANf I, FROM AIAFAL aUAVEYFRAFARAT90 DVLMI. AVFMC .plc ,mu a.wf urn - MULTI - FAMILY UNITS .•.. -.— NawAUI`NEI11M.a1eOm TTIF JCaFrlrfp)fl FROM AAAW.nmocAAFtY pwnD NLEI. 5 Au nn•mLEIOnA p•Xr.TOn leEEl fV>I NOR anwl t. AESfYOAf FAACAL MD.1 roRTON OFIII -11a - atOMr /1oR TDfYAe •Ii1IW N'LY FaRr.mnOrtA01aD. �. !1 11 1111 10 INO• '.q0' �F ONNE gtIBDIVIDER w /SEE. L ALL FROMSED DMOVEMEMTA A MIRARTRUCTIM AA[ STOMGRA)RIC tIRV[Y IR[tARIDt1 DIGfl•I. MAnPO, L.C. :i _ - (aeq fM W H1 rntM RMYIIA1MeNr co. FLIELDAM•AY AND MRCr TO CRANOL M FMAL DaSI01r. TROM AMrYLmoltlERA1aY D•nDlwNt. \J 1 I(' �. 1^ _ pW G sM rAU.r.at tAUa•fu /. B[L GRADMO A DRADrAG[ COMCFJ7UAL FLANS FOR GRADING. 1•u aanmrc R>RfrcTnM lAVpc. I.•[Wirr), FTC. TeK u . I II(�III (.I .I:. rI. RO.ROR aL Galliaa �a�tRf cotraa Nflml.fM1 - L ART.I. °RKgUANTrrL%A"MIAMAGEDKVKI . �_ :I Y �PRMNAGE',. CO NCEPT MUCTURAX, PAVING, FACRlfaA, [TC TOR f W04FRO CONCaIR IMAE FOR RRfa•Oa D[YMrt rt � _ NYwR.. tf"wAWRCAMION IINO NE gR.rol RWOVfO. NOTLI .•En[Ra1r,EAYR[.w•Y•OR. nMt•TM �. �rMTNF. ra MD.n.rraut>.•>a "[v.D• LEGAL nt•A E��v[znr.::: uooRrwcG.r: OWNER AIrf0.D1ATRY LD rt.1D.'> +INtRAMrOVtM>X> ,, +r r , HIRTIONS OF BLOCK U M•Wa AND RARE, WTWCM RAN a.. .-a— •vMODS —1 OfRLRICt IL AMEET SABA TO AL PROVIDED FOR EACX LOT• LOCATION WILL MYRMLMD[IUn ANrMOT1•Mt Ra OF MOORPARK. CDVMTY OF YAMI STATA 0I CALDOwIh taLahl0lll °.yq01Ll NOp•>•ex -CA p1[I IE IM FRONT YARD NITR IOACTLOCATION TO A[ DETERMINED M.Vmo•'O' OEIAOORFARR IVAMYAIIOMiRANC710 BDrp•- Mf WANDAV/- lal.1E/ law"' a, `"TER CONCEPTUAL (TRADING PLAN """"" " °"'°"'"�'°� E.R`N,A>•G.MM INR w«M.1EI.EM. FIAT yr ✓u I✓ r "• Irvr•un I......A I . "tiro •• IT L"u� - EMEET TITLE CITY OF MOORPARK SKYVIEW ENG:TFJ U+G S R M"142 SHEET •Y, rrrxrr .. I..11ct 1a.x Let r✓ rlr.r 5 COLMLI DEYELOFM[Kr CO. , N /IHa Ara RTnfrn SIN PARKWAY CALB"AS �DEVELOPM6Ni IDa1 SUITEIIE 'TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 5307. CONSUMNI'S,U +a .L, AA CALAWA6CAflfl7 FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSE rLAMMMO enclMAeama REVALOFM[Mr �I T. .Da MDM enarwMrAaeuDMl IMn m..or a s wean ATTACHMENT3•1). PLAN 2 rL.r+iv 11 1856 SQ.FT. 1659 SQ.FT. SCALE 1/4 " =1' -0" F L O R Y A V E N U E Lu m z w COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS 01 -28-02 l 4' ,l pa i# i i i ROOF NEW. L---- --------------- - - - - -- 667 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' = V-O" FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' - 1' -0" PLAN 3 SOVAREFOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 485 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR 657 SO. FT. TOTAL 1150 S0. FT. GARAGE 450 SO. FT. I N LIJ Z m O Q W Im 1 W. Q O u W Q pYC W O O u 2 Arr All rs�nrr.lnt Itll(p 4RynAw Y }jl 3w Ann G R]Kl FAXf1111 M1.p11 N. 03 -3oa3 I Of 33'A" Ir - F - - - - - - -- FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4' - 1' -0" PLAN 3 SOVAREFOOTAGE FIRST FLOOR 485 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR 657 SO. FT. TOTAL 1150 S0. FT. GARAGE 450 SO. FT. I N LIJ Z m O Q W Im 1 W. Q O u W Q pYC W O O u 2 Arr All rs�nrr.lnt Itll(p 4RynAw Y }jl 3w Ann G R]Kl FAXf1111 M1.p11 N. 03 -3oa3 I Of E L E V A T I O N S SCALE 1/4 " =1' -O" F L O R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS of -ae-0z LFGEND I.'S' III .E B FLAA III .E C'. STUCCO cDR IICI. D. DECOPAn%F X E`:I E S1lK'CD F. STONE G SE0o,,L G -il, wr UIk�R H. COPPER ROOD I. N'DOD SNU. l R 1. WOOD POr%HFLF K. DECOR. {TIFF TILF L WROLf NTIRO1 !.i. 1-INYL 11111) N. N, ET,NL %EN'T L� Z LU F i UP PI-AN I SPANISH ------------- PLAN 2 SPANISH SCALE 1/8--l'-O- E L E V A T 1 0 N S F L 0 R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONT ARCHITECTS -21zm- 7112, b- 8 ArrAllASIw.A, l.< IY, LA II �1. ■MI��II �1 ^Fli�i■. 1�1 ■w���� ■�wt� - - -. .Iwn..1■I ■n t �. � `� x,111�1 .1� �1��.�111� ■I�.���t����w�� ._r_ wlt�n■�weu. -sue �Irr�l� �l��rl��_� \I�r�l����_���In�.1 � � �, � wr �mon��n.•� ��j�� -��.� �_ p■�■�wl■■n�� �ni..u�awww.. - ��� E. LEGEND LEF-T-SIDF— ELEVATION A. S. . • ...- C. STUCCO D. E. ... F. ... POTSHELF DECORATIVE G. H. WROUGHT IRON J. METAL VENT K. STUCCO TRIM RIGHT 2101 ELEVATION REARIH."ATION EXISTING RESIDENTIAL FRONT YARD PRIVATE MAINTENANCE AREAS A, y A Q 0: 0 h/ LIMITS OF MAINTENANCE - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EVERGREEN ACCENT TREES, E.G. STRAWBERRY TREE, RHAPHIOLEPIS 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY', SWEETSHADE, ETC. 0 m 5aler bogus daalgm jn1#capa architecture 6 planning ee N�wMrlk�u,y,,,M 71 /a eN A+er,w.�WN� M, C�alerMr r]eH :.. "A "STREET LOS ANGELES AVENUE DECIDUOUS FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE TREE, E.G. ALDER, POPLAR, SYCAMORE FLOWERING EVERGREEN FOUNDATION SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS, E.G. INDIA HAWTHORN, ROCKROSE, PITTOSPORUM, LILY-OF-THE-MILE, DAY LILIES, NEW ZEALAND FLAX, KANGAROO PAW / TURF AREAS PROVIDE NPDES DETENTION IN FRONT YARDS PER CIVIL ENGINEER 9.J-a.5' HEIGHT LOS ANGELES AVENUE,- - V HEIGHT FLORY AVENUE SPLIT-FACE MASONRY BLOCK WALL, COLOR TO BE BEIGE WITH A DARK BROWN TOP COURSE AND PERIODIC ACCENT BLOCKS S'-S" TO S' HEIGHT SIDE YARD TO BE SOLID BEIGE COLOR REAR YARDS NOT A PART LOS ANGELES AVENUEIFLORY AVENUE TYPICAL WALL ELEVATION aacr: r•rr • VINYL GATE. POSTS AND HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER j L i 1--------- -- = - -- -- -- 1 OPTIONAL VINYL GATE ELEVATION TRACT 5307 © MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPAAY T. 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 1 10 eu e: W TYPICAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING Calabasas, Califomia 91302 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 2001 -01 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM S (SCHOOLS) TO VH (VERY HIGH DENSITY) ON ONE PARCEL (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2.44 GROSS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 filed by Colmer Development Company, for a change in the Land Use Designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) on approximately 2.44 gross acres of land located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1, 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff report, and testimony received, reached a decision on this matter on May 1, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Moorpark General Plan. SECTION 2. That the City Council adopts the following California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Colmer Development Company project serves as the environmental document for the General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. ATTACHMENT 4 S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso gpa colmerl.doc Resolution No. 2002 - Colmer GPA 2001 -01 Page 2 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to General Plan Amendment 2001 -01. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 for a change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density Residential) as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of May, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: General Plan Exhibit Map GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT MAP I AVE � u � M u►SSFH AV �Jk) ANc,ElES) Cp itT ST 'A elf sa c 1 S t -3RD StiA) si o at —QAW S1;A. N%p < MCA'( } _CLDl. 0 DCPCJTHY A oc , (RUTH 2ND ST. I r AH n I FU f ( SUSM Al& I ' tWAERT!5� 7i ESTHEP SNE1J4!N A r� HWY. ItVE. 1 w, i k 25 AVE t0 VH W 7s , �— MA JESM. �A '— cl Y NORTH EXHIBIT A I z c.. i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE (ZC) NO. 2001 -01 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM R -2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RPD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) 9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE ON ONE PARCEL (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 2.44 GROSS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET, ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered the application filed by Colmer Development Company for approval of Zone Change No. 2001 -01 for a change in the - Zoning Designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development, 9 dwelling units per acre) on one (1) parcel (APN 512 -0- 110 -112) totaling approximately 2.44 gross acres of land located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1 2002, the City Council opened the public hearing and took public testimony and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the City Council staff reports and testimony, has made a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Colmer Development Company project serves as the environmental document for the Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to Zone Change No. 2001 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Zone Change 2001 -01. oc S: \Community Development\ Everyone \Ord � lmd iA \AC� Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Zone Change will be in conformance with the City's General Plan, subject to adoption of a Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2001 -01, and is in conformance with the City Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby finds that approval of this Zone Change request is in accord with public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice and that for those reasons it is appropriate to reclassify the property to RPD 9 dwelling units per acre, as the RPD designation would provide a suitable location for residential land uses that are compatible with property located in the vicinity of the property. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves Zone Change No. 2001 -01 changing the zoning designation on the property from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 (Residential Planned Development 9 units per acre maximum), as further described in Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby directs staff to amend the City Zoning Map to reflect the approved zone change. SECTION 6. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute order of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of Ordinance No. Zone Change No. 2001 -01 Page 3 the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 2002. _Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk EXHIBIT A: Zoning Exhibit Map ZONING EXHIBIT MAP Al LOS ANGELES) HR cT n WcT �T �A S O c s t -3RD SITS) s% 0 2 -SAW ST(A m/0 < Fi-Atr < r _ 1- alf�UiM7 A� !I ' FM TM , -s 4 2 2?m 1 FSA;R I k M A �VE '? -- % --'- SUSAN A R08ERTS AW-] esTHF—P, AVEJ � S S�IEFK.! M A (HWY.1 11 8) le AVE. < <. R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac. Ll-A t � I NAJE5T1G� PE � -W Cl. / - ;' Fula If; i ► `• S lot —i CL ' % ; / i : _ _ / 1 *E'•STr.,% 7E P.L`. pi ' � //• r-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _3 Bu1TE;4fiF1L1 lN. LMM"j Lm. A NORTH EXHIBIT A 1 CHAP ^R"RAL M►GV s ►- Al LOS ANGELES) HR cT n WcT �T �A S O c s t -3RD SITS) s% 0 2 -SAW ST(A m/0 < Fi-Atr < r _ 1- alf�UiM7 A� !I ' FM TM , -s 4 2 2?m 1 FSA;R I k M A �VE '? -- % --'- SUSAN A R08ERTS AW-] esTHF—P, AVEJ � S S�IEFK.! M A (HWY.1 11 8) le AVE. < <. R -2 to RPD 9 du /ac. Ll-A t � I NAJE5T1G� PE � -W Cl. / - ;' Fula If; i ► `• S lot —i CL ' % ; / i : _ _ / 1 *E'•STr.,% 7E P.L`. pi ' � //• r-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _3 Bu1TE;4fiF1L1 lN. LMM"j Lm. A NORTH EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5307, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2001 -01 and VARIANCE NO. 2002 -01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.44 ACRES OF LAND ON ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 512 -0 -11 -112 INTO TWENTY -TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND FLORY STREET ON THE APPLICATION OF COLMER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, at a duly - noticed Public Hearing on May 1, 2002, the City Council considered Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 5307, Residential Planned Development (RPD) Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance (VAR) No. 2002 -01 on the application of Colmer Development Company for the subdivision of approximately 2.44 acres into twenty -two (22) single family residential lots and the construction of 22 single family units located on the northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Street (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0 -11 -112); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 1, 2002, the City Council conducted a public hearing and received public testimony, and after receiving public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does Tentative Permit No. the City's Tract Map No. 5307, Residential 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 General Plan. hereby find that Planned Development are consistent with SECTION 2. The City Council further finds that Tentative Tract 5307 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001- 01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 are consistent with Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the projects. SECTION 3. That the City Council adopts the following additional findings: S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc / _ Modified: 04/24/02 ATT j� CH ■ ENT /��/ RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. Page 2 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for GPA 2001 -01, ZC 2001 -01, RPD 2001 -01, TTM 5307 and VAR 2002 -01 serves as the environmental document for the Tentative Tract Map, Residential Planned Development Permit and Variance. _ 2. In order to reduce the potential adverse impacts of this project, mitigation measures discussed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated and shall apply to Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance 2002 -01. 3. A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 and considered in the various decisions regarding these projects applies to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01. Subdivision Map Act Findings: Based on the information set forth above, it has been determined that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 3 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Residential Planned Development Permit Findings: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 Page 4 Variance Findings 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property, with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The project is _located adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue, which is a four - lane divided major arterial. The annual average two -way traffic in 2001 was 34,000 vehicles. This number is expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles by 2020. In addition 19.4% of all the vehicles consist of medium to heavy trucks using the route as an alternative to H -101. In order for the project to comply with the City's adopted exterior noise standard of 65 dBA, a sound wall must be constructed along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. 2. That the granting of the Variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Other existing residential properties located along Los Angeles Avenue utilize tall sound walls to mitigate the noise from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition since this is an infill project on an existing school site, it was not possible to provide a large setback from the edge of Los Angeles Avenue. 3. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations in that the residents of the proposed homes would not be able to enjoy the use of their back yards due to the traffic noise from Los Angeles Avenue. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties as the sound wall will be properly engineered and constructed. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - TTM No. 5307, RPD No. Page 5 2001 -01, VAR 2002 -01 The overall visual height of the wall will be reduced by the provision of a 2 to 3 foot high planter located in front of the wall. The landscape planer will be landscaped with shrubs and vines to further screen the wall. SECTION Map No. 5307, and Variance Approval. 4. That the Residential No. 2002 -01 City Council approves Tentative Tract Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 subject to the attached Conditions of SECTION 5. The approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01 is contingent upon final approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01 and Zone Change No. 2001 -01 and shall not become effective until the effective date of the zone change ordinance. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01. S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \cc 020501 reso rpd ttm var colmerl.doc Modified: 04/24/02 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PC- 2002 -422 (See Attachment 2) EXHIBIT A CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlements: Residential Planned Development (RPD 2001 -01) Tract Map 5307 General Plan Amendment (GPA 2001 -01) Zone Change (ZC 2001 -01) Variance (VAR 2002 -01) 2. Applicant: Mr. Wayne Colmer Colmer Development 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Ste. 110 Calabasas, CA 91302 3. Proposal: A Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a portion (2.40 acres) of the Flory School site to create a small lot subdivision consisting of 22 lots. A Residential Planned Development permit to construct 22 single family dwellings and a Variance to allow an 11.5 foot high wall along portions of Los Angeles Avenue for purposes of sound attenuation. The application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment from S (School) to VH (Very High Density) and Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD (Residential Planned Development -9 Dwelling Units /Acre). 4. Location: Northeast comer of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue APN #512 -0 -11 -112 5. Responsible Agencies: None II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Community Development Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study, it has been determined that this project would not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation measures described and attached have been added to the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. ��� A TTACHMENT? C� - III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Public Notice: Publication of a notice in a newspaper of general circulation the area. 2. Document Posting Period 3/5/02 to 4/2/02. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [X] Land Use and Planning [] Transportation/Circulation [ J Public Services [ ] Population and Housing [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Utilities & Service Systems [ ] Geological Problems [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [X] Aesthetics [ ] Water [X] Hazards [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Air Quality [X] Noise [ ] Recreation V. MITIGATION MEASURES 1) A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 2) The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 3) To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 4) All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 5) All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 2 VI. REFERENCE LIST The references used in preparing this questionnaire include the following: Standard References: 1. EIR for Moorpark Land Use and Circulation Element Update and Sphere of Influence Expansion Study (1992). 2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 005 A, September 29, 1986 and revision dated August 24, 1990. 3. General Plan of the City of Moorpark, as amended through 2002. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 1987. 5. Moorpark Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning.. 6. Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model Model Description and Validation, June 1994. 7. Technical Appendices for the General Plan Noise Element, November 1994. 8. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 9. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses, 1989. 10. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, 1991. Project References: 1. Traffic Noise Study Report, Advanced Engineering Acoustics, March 14, 2001 and June 8, 2001 Addendum. 2. Phase I Environmental Assessment Report, Chaparral Associates, September 24, 1986. 3. Tree Valuation Report, Kevin J. Small Associates, March 15, 2001. 4. Geotechnical Investigation Report, Geolabs, February 22, 2001. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial Environmental Study to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Prepared By Joyce Parker - Bozylinski Date: March 4, 2002 Case Planner Approved By: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Date Acting Director of Community Development 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than signiricant No Impact b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an Impact with X agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited Miti ation X LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an X agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited X to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural X communities conservation plan? X d) Result in direct or indirect population related growth inducement impacts (significantly expand employment opportunities, remove policy impediments to growth, or contribute to potential extensions X of growth inducing infrastructure)? 2. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or X special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantially adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, X policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not X limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident X migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, and other approved X local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Result in damage to, loss of, or removal of native oak trees or other locally identified specimen trees of significance? X %-e v .:.....el Environmental Factor Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact I with ';_ AIR nUALITY: Would the project: 4. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resources pursuant to Section 15064.5 X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X e) Result in physical disruption of an identified sacred place or other ethnographically documented location of significance to native X ("alifnrnianc7 X GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map X issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of X Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X X (iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? (iv) Landslides? b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in X on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 5 Environmental Factor Potentially i Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With e) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -a -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or X X property? f) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic X tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are X not available for the disposal of wastewater? g) Result in remediation scars (benched slopes, etc.) whose X dimensions cannot be predicted with reasonable accuracy based on a preliminary geotechnical report? 6. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project? a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the X likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an X exiting or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section X 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or X public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in X the project area? g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are X adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Environmental Factor Potentially Less Than Less Than No requirements? Significant Significant Significant Impact b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere Impact With substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a Mitigation 7. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially degrade groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater X table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, X or substantially increase the rate or surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off site? d) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of X existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide X substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X e Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X fl Place housing within a 100 -year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other X flood hazard delineation map? g) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the X failure of a levee or dam? i) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X 8. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X development open to public view? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic X highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site and its surroundings? X d) Create sources of incompatibility with the existing scenic and aesthetic environment of the community or quality of life impacts X on residents? e) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day views in the area? X f) Significantly impact any existing streetscape or public space which has been designed to provide areas of public assembly and X congregation? g) Conflict with adopted design guidelines or development standards which have been implemented to improve the quality of X architecture in the community? „t",,,, 11% 1. �- Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than significant No Impact would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Impact With X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral Mitigation X 9. MINERAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that X would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral X resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific X plan or other land use plan? X X 10 NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of X standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, X or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome X vibration or groundbome noise levels? X X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X project vicinity above levels existing without the project or in rural X areas, increase measurably the ambient noise levels more than 5 X dbs? d) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or X public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? e) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to X excessive noise levels? 11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Result in impacts to an established ethnic community? X b) Create substantial demands for affordable low income housing in a jurisdiction which does not have an adequate stock of such X housing? X c) Result in substantial conflicts between type, size, and quality of X proposed and existing housing in the project vicinity? X d) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X 12. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance uu c�uvca lul all vi &'IV MVa,v v X a) Fire protection? b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X M Environmental Factor Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Less Than Significant No Impact recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of Impact with X the facility would occur or be accelerated? Miti ation 13. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of X the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might X have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X 14. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the nroiect: a) Cause an increase in the traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result X in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? X b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency X or City General Plan Circulation Element threshold? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in X substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards related to existing intersections or X roadway design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous X intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. residential traffic conflicts with farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate secondary or emergency access? X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X 15. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of X which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded X entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which services or may serve the project determined that it has X adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Environmental Factor f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs for a minimum ten -year period? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste? h) Provide for on -site source separation and recycling facilities which are adequately sized for the proposed use? 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with X ►0 i) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife X species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? j) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means X that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? k) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or X indirectly? Land Use - The proposed project would be inconsistent with the current General Plan and Zoning designation on the property. However, the application includes a request for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from S (School) to VH (Very High Residential) and a Zone Change to change the land use designation from R -2 (Two Family Residential to RPD (Residential Planned Development). Hazards - A portion of the site is currently being used for school bus storage and vehicle maintenance activities. Two underground fuel tanks are located on the site and hazardous wastes (oil, solvents, cleaners, engine coolants, etc.) are generated and temporarily stored at the site. A Phase I Environmental Assessment Report was completed for the project and found that while the vehicle maintenance activities at the property involve the use of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are generated on site, the subject property appears to be free of any contamination. Aesthetics - The project proposes to construct a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue ranging in height from 9.5 feet to 11.5 feet. In order to screen the wall, the project will provide a 5 to 6.foot wide landscape planter in front of the wall adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. This planter will be planted with shrubs and vines to screen the wall and tree wells are provided at the corner of each lot. 10 Noise - A noise study prepared for the project analyzed the noise from traffic on Los Angeles Avenue. The results of the study indicate that the outdoor living areas (side and rear yards) of the lots adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue (Lots 1 though 11) would comply with the City's 65 dBA CNEL traffic noise limit with the installation of a sound wall along Los Angeles Avenue. The sound wall would range from 9.5 to 11.5 feet above the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue. The study also recommended mitigation measures such as increased window thickness, double - glazing of windows and gasketing of doors) to reduce the interior noise levels to 45 CNEL as required by the City. CEQA MITIGATION MEASURES Noise 6) A sound wall shall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 9.5 feet above the centerline surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 10.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 3 to 9 and 11.5 feet above the centerline for Lots 10 and 11. 7) The sound wall shall extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 6 -foot high wall height. 8) To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch latch and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 9) All second story windows along Los Angeles Avenue shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 10) All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 1 through 11 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather - stripping, or an effective equivalent. 11 Advanced Engineering Acoustics 663 Bristol Avenue Simi Valley, California 93065 -5402 (805) 583 -8207 - Voice (805) 522 -6636 - Fax (805) 231 -1242 - Cell June 8, 2001 Mr. Wayne Colmer Colmer Development 5000 Parkway Calabasas Calabasas, CA 91302 Subject: 22 -Lot Residential Development at East L.A. Ave & Flory Street in Moorpark Reference: AEA's Traffic Noise Study Report for the Colmer Development, dated March 2001 _ Dear Mr. Colmer: Advanced Engineering Acoustics (AEA) has reviewed and analyzed the raising of the subject residence pads by 2 feet and the affect on the heights of the sound wall along East Los Angeles Ave. This letter report presents the results of the analysis. This document may be submitted by Colmer Development to the City of Moorpark. The results of the referenced AEA report indicated that the outdoor living areas (side and rear yards) of Lots 1 through 11 would comply with the 65 dBA CNEL traffic noise limit of the City, with a proper sound wall along Los Angeles Ave. The raising of the residence pads of these Lots has required another look at the performance of the recommended sound walls. At your request, we have analyzed Lots 1 through 11 with the higher pad elevations. The following table gives the new recommended sound wall heights. Lot Number Minimum Sound Wall Height above Los Angeles Ave. Center Line Pavement Surface Approximate Sound Wall Distance from Los Angeles Ave. Center Line 1 and 2 9.5 feet 65 feet 3 through 9 10.5 feet 65 feet Ed 10 and 11 11.5 feet 65 feet If you have any questions regarding this noise report supplement, please contact me at (805) 583- 8207, or on my cell phone at (805) 231 -1242. I am available to work with you, as needed, as you complete this project. Sincerely, Marlund E. Hale, Ph.D.. P.E. Technical Director R1 E . "F;I V ED GL ATTACHMENT o ,ra 10-. "T A A TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY REPORT FOR THE COLMER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA MARCH 14, 2001 Submitted to COWER DEVELOPMENT 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 110 Calabasas, CA 91302 Submitted by ADVANCED ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS 663 Bristol Avenue Simi Valley, CA 93065 -5402 IMED MAR 2 0 2001 , ���rt��k�RNPIt TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY FOR THE COLMER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LOS ANGELES AVENUE BETWEEN FLORY AVENUE AND MILLARD AVENUE 1.0 INTRODUCTION The site layout plan and project floor plan drawings (Colmer, 2001) for the proposed 22- unit single family housing development in Moorpark, California have been reviewed to determine compliance with the City of Moorpark (City) noise control requirements. The following assessment and recommendations are provided as a result of the review and analysis of noise impacts due to traffic on East Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and just west of Millard Avenue. The proposed project site is located on a partially developed lot on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue. Figure 1 shows the project vicinity. The site is bordered to the west by Flory Avenue and on the east by single - family residential properties on Millard Avenue. Flory Avenue Elementary School property and other public buildings border the north side of the site. There will be one traffic entrance to the site from Flory Avenue. Figure 2 shows the proposed layout of the project and the nearby roadways. Lots 1 -11 (numbered west to east) are closest to Los Angeles Avenue traffic. Lots 12 -22 (numbered east to west) are further north and across a new street from Lots 1 -11. 2.0 NOISE CONTROL STANDARDS The City of Moorpark has established interior and exterior noise criteria for the development of any new residential dwellings in order to protect the health and welfare of the residents (Moorpark, 2001a). These are specified in the Noise Element of the General Plan and the Technical Appendix to the Noise Element (Moorpark, 1998). The interior noise limit is an energy average community noise equivalent level (CNEL) of 45 dBA and applies to all interior areas except bathrooms, closets and corridors. The exterior noise level is to be mitigated so that the interior noise limit is not exceeded while the windows are closed. The exterior noise standard is an energy average CNEL of 65 dBA and applies to all exterior living spaces, which are defined as a single family private yard, a multi - family private patio served by an interior exit, and mobile home parks. The CNEL noise descriptor is a 24 -hour, time - weighted average noise level. It is a single number composed of the logarithmic sum of the hourly equivalent energy average noise levels (LeQ) with an additional 5 dB added to the hourly levels between 7 pm and 10 pm and 10 dB added to those hourly levels between 10 pm and 7 am. Colmer Resi, .,Ial Development March 2001 iE W • 4 1 - 1111,11t, r 20 I r 18 'spli 05 TR 13 4 -------- - - - .... ....... 8 1. UuL—L- 10 I . . .......... Fio� Ri 7 THE- . . ....... :M-2 ...;hHhbb. 5�.T 54 ASPH LOS ANGELES :—C 9 e_: VF FIGURE 2. PROJECT LAYOUT MAP AND SOUND METER LOCATIONS t: 3 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 3.0 CURRENT AND FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE The main contributor of noise from the south of this site is traffic on East Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and Millard Avenue. Los Angeles Avenue is a four -lane divided major arterial, which runs east and west, south of the proposed development. 3.1 Roadway Traffic Volumes Los Angeles Avenue Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and peak hour volumes for most recent years (1998 and 1999) were obtained from the Caltrans website (Caltrans, 2001). The 20 -year build -out (2020) traffic volumes were estimated at 3/4% growth rate per year, based on the 1997 to 1999 ADT data from Caltrans (Caltrans, 2001). The truck traffic mix was also obtained from the Caltrans website. These data are presented on Table 1. TABLE 1 - LOS ANGELES AVENUE TRAFFIC DATA Annual Ave rage Two ay Daily Traffic (ADT Los An eles Avenue Traffic ADT 337000 33,500 33,500 34,000 38,900 Peak Hour % 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 % Medium Trucks 8.0 8.0 n/a 8.0 8.0 % Heavy Trucks 11.4 11.4 n/a 11.4 11.4 Speed Limit (mph) 35/ 35/ 35/ 35/ 35/ 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** 25 ** n/a = not available from Caltrans * Projections based on available data and growth rate assumption. * * Speed Limit when children are present. 3.2 Noise Measurement and Analysis Morning peak hour noise measurements were conducted at the proposed project site along Los Angeles Avenue on Wednesday, January 31, 2001. The two project site traffic noise monitoring locations are shown on Figure 2. The noise monitoring equipment were ANSI Type 2 sound level meters and were calibrated before and after the noise monitoring sessions, according to the manufacturer's instructions. CNEL values were calculated using a computer program based on the Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA, 1978) which uses Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes. The program takes into account the locations of receptors, roadway noise sources using the CALVENO emissions, and noise barriers, and determines CNEL both with and without sound walls. The unshielded and unmitigated Year 2020 65 CNEL contour distance from the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue would be about 46 meters (150 feet). The noise levels for existing and projected traffic volumes on Los Angeles Avenue are summarized on Table 2. 4 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 4.0 NOISE CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Los Angeles Avenue Environs As shown on Table 2, the existing and future exterior CNEL traffic noise levels along the southern area of the project toward Los Angeles Avenue are greater than the 65 CNEL noise limits. The predicted CNEL sound levels at the residential locations, for barrier heights which achieve the CNEL criterion, are given on Table 3. Figure 3 shows the sound wall locations and the Year 2020 unmitigated and mitigated 65 CNEL contour. During peak traffic noise hours, noise levels at the outdoor living areas of the project residences, with properly implemented sound walls, would be at or below the City's exterior criteria of 65 CNEL. TABLE 2 - MEASURED AND UNMITIGATED NOISE MODEL RESULTS PH = Peak Noise Hour. Note 1: Calibration K factor of —3.2 dB to match predicted with measured Leq. Note 2: Interior peak noise hour estimates based on 15 dB noise reduction with closed windows. TABLE 3 - MITIGATED TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL RESULTS (with sound wall noise barrier mitigation) 2020 1 South Rear Exterior 72 68 65 64 63 4 South Rear Exterior 72 68 66 65 63 8 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 66 65 64 11 1 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 67 66 64 Note l: Interior noise is estimated to be 15 dB lower than the exterior CNEL. 4.2 Southern Property Line Mitigation It is recommended that a sound wall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 2.4 meters i.at iVleasurect PH Pxdieted I'S Pred►eted Year >`Iumbcr current Site 1TL (dH r 2001 15 ft to South PL, 71.5 72.0 71.5 20 ft to West PL 8 15 ft to So.PL fence 72.5 72.5 72.0 fear t Future Site LoCatiort P�red�etcd P.R i Pclictett Chi Ei�dBA i ::Number Le` tdBA) Exterior 72 72 2020 1 South Side of House Interiorl 57 57 Exterior 73 73 FJ 8 Sout L Side of House Interiorl 5 g 5 8 PH = Peak Noise Hour. Note 1: Calibration K factor of —3.2 dB to match predicted with measured Leq. Note 2: Interior peak noise hour estimates based on 15 dB noise reduction with closed windows. TABLE 3 - MITIGATED TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL RESULTS (with sound wall noise barrier mitigation) 2020 1 South Rear Exterior 72 68 65 64 63 4 South Rear Exterior 72 68 66 65 63 8 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 66 65 64 11 1 South Rear Exteriorl 73 69 67 66 64 Note l: Interior noise is estimated to be 15 dB lower than the exterior CNEL. 4.2 Southern Property Line Mitigation It is recommended that a sound wall be constructed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 11, along Los Angeles Avenue. The top of the sound wall must be 2.4 meters Colmer Residential Development March 2001 (8 feet) above the center line surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 1 and 2, 2.7 meters (9 feet) above the Los Angeles Avenue center line surface for Lots 3 to 9, and 3.0 meters (10 feet) above the center line surface of Los Angeles Avenue for Lots 10 and 11. The sound wall would need to extend at least 20 feet to the north on the west side of Lot 1 and at least 20 feet on the east side of Lot 11. These extensions would then transition gradually in height down to a standard 1.8 meters (6 feet) yard wall height. The sound wall would need to extend as shown on the project layout plan (Figure 3). Once properly installed, the recommended sound wall would provide the required noise attenuation from Los Angeles Avenue traffic for all backyards and side yards of the project. 4.3 Interior Noise Level Reduction To calculate the noise reduction of the planned residences, noise sensitive rooms for each floor level were evaluated using a method developed for the FHWA (FHWA, 1977). Since it would be impossible to obtain an interior noise of 45 CNEL or below with the "windows open ", the method used was a "windows closed" analysis. This method is acceptable since central air and heating, featured in all the designed structures, fulfills the requirement for mechanical ventilation for a "windows closed" analysis to be considered. A minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 -inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 -inch gypsum board, 3.5 -inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 -inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments, will provide approximately 15 -20 dBA noise reduction for traffic -type noise. Double glazing the windows and gasketing the doors will increase the noise reduction to about 20 -25 dBA. Since sound walls typically provide no mitigation for second stories, double glazing of all residential second story windows of Lots 1 to 11, with a view (even though blocked by trees) of Los Angeles Avenue, is recommended. NElgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies, or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating, is recommended, for all double glazing applications. It is further recommended that rear and side entry doors of the above specified eleven houses be gasketed (jamb, head, sill) with interlocking or tube -type compression weather- stripping, or an effective equivalent. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An analysis has been performed to determine compliance of the proposed single - family residential development north of Los Angeles Avenue, between Flory Avenue and Millard Avenue, with City of Moorpark noise standards. The analysis shows that impacts on the project would not exceed the 65 CNEL outdoor living area noise standards, once the recommended exterior noise control measures are properly implemented. It also has been determined that a well constructed, standard exterior building shell, along with the proper implementation of the recommended architectural noise mitigation measures, for the eleven specified structures, would reduce the traffic noise within the residential interiors of Lots 1 through 11 to less than 45 CNEL, as required by the City of Moorpark. No traffic noise mitigation measures are required for Lots 12 -22. T Colmer Resia—vial Development March 2001 .50 • 4 .509.53 so ry A189 *SS'00 em KC7. ASN 14 V4 20 o x5=0.36 4 12 - , is: 13, L._ L --- A7 c EL 65 CN son 41L$a 7 L i 4r�4' % 01-1 U 7 3 ASNI Kul' 54 ASPH LOS ANGELES- FIGURE 3. UNMITIGATED 65 CNEL CONTOUR AND RECOMMENDED SOUND WALL LOCATION 7 Colmer Residential Development March 2001 6.0 REFERENCES 4 Caltrans, 2001. Traffic and Vehicle Data Systems Unit, Caltrans Traffic Operations, January. Colmer, 2001. Lot Plans for a Residential Development on Los Angeles Avenue in Moorpark, CA. Colmer Development Company, Calabasas, CA. January. FHWA, 1977. Federal Highway Administration Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA -TS -77 -202. Prepared by T.M. Barry and J.A. Reagan. December. FHWA, 1978. Insulation of Buildings Against Highway Noise Manual, FHWA -RD -77 -108. Prepared by B. Davy and S. Skale. August. Moorpark, 1998. City of Moorpark, Noise Element of the General Plan. Match. Moorpark, 2001a. City of Moorpark, Planning Department, conversations with M. Hale. January & February. Moorpark, 2001b. City of Moorpark, Traffic Engineer, conversations with M. Hale and response for requested traffic data. January & February. A-' ,-,k �.�' , To: From 4P CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Honorable City Council Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director ) Prepared By: Laura Stringer, Senior Management Analyst Date: May 1, 2002 (CC meeting of 5/1/02) ln�5 Subject: Item 9. B., Additional Exhibits for General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01on the Application of Colmer Development Company The applicant has provided the City Council with these reduced copies of the colored renderings of the front elevations of each unit. Unfortunately, the copying process does not reflect the actual colors as proposed by the applicant. Please refer to the color board and full scale color drawings, which will be available at the meeting, for a more accurate depiction of architectural colors. Also included, is a copy of the sketch showing the impact of recommended revisions to Condition No. 80 to provide for a fifty foot (501) curb radius at the north east corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Flory Avenue. S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc 020501 memo exhibits Colmer.doc f w � r - � r ,/.�ff'�'•y.'s� ec `,'h, '' -.t '. eta d +'.r. Si v V .Il�w 6 ftng Noma t o ! • t war .r.iI r.> _ �® 4. r w ' s p 7,j ' �C a: r Iva+1;rte 1;, f 9PANI SH I -C Y- G ill �Il E L E V A T I O N S SCALE 1/4 V -0" F L O R Y A V E N U E COLMER DEVELOPMENT BASSENIAN LAGONI ARCHITECTS 01:18 -02 LEGEND A. 'S' TtLE B. FLAT TILE C. STUCCO CORBEL D. DECORATIVE VENT E. STUCCO F. STONE G. SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR H. COPPER ROOF I. WOOD SHUTTER I. WOOD POTSHELF K. DECORATIVE TILE L. WROUGHT IRON M. VINYL WINDOW N. METAL VENT ITEM 10 - A —r, s.•,P�T+''.,f� f- ,`I,.•S- 's�F?A,� ` ACTT r x'a- ITEM 10.A. Consider Status Report on Ventura Council of Governments (VCOG) Staffing and Budget Options. (Continued from City Council Meeting of April 17, 2002) Staff Recommendation: Continue VCOG Membership. THERE IS NO WRITTEN AGENDA REPORT AT THIS TIME. VENTURA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS WILL MEET ON APRIL 25, 2002, AT 5:00 P.M. A REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE MAY 1, 2002, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. `�i d •v .li.. +J MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM -/0 • 8 cT7,v nF moon 'ARK. CAT,TrORNTA Citv Cmmcil Meeting ACTTON: TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATOM /City Clerk DATE: April 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/1/02) SUBJECT: Consider Rescheduling of Joint City Council /Planning Commission Meeting BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The planned joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission on April 24, 2002 was cancelled. Staff is requesting that the Council reschedule the joint meeting for Wednesday, May 8, at 6:30 p.m. Staff will request a Ventura County Flood Control District presentation for that agenda pertaining to the flood hazard study underway for the Arroyo Simi. Discussion of the goals and objectives for the 2002 -2003 Fiscal Year will also be included on the joint meeting agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to reschedule the joint City Council /Planning Commission meeting for May 8, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. r\„ " 'y v -J„ %y CTTY or monRrARK. C,AT,TFORNTA City Cnnncil Nlrrfintt ACTTON: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager DATE: April 24, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee for Development Agreement with USA Properties Fund, Inc. (USA) DISCUSSION: USA is processing a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2002 -01), Zone Change (ZC 2002 -01) and Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD 2002 -02) on the property directly west of the Archstone apartment project at the intersection of Park Lane and Parkcrest Lane. The proposed project would have as many as 190 apartments for low- income seniors. As currently proposed, 20 percent of the units would be for residents at or below 50 percent of median income (very low income), and 80 percent of the units would be for residents at 60 percent of the median income. USA is seeking to process this in a manner that would allow award of a State Bond Allocation. Issues to be considered by the ad hoc committee would include density, site design including parking requirements, modification to development standards, property tax offset, and requested financial assistance from City /MRA. As with other projects involving changes to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, it is appropriate to have a Development Agreement and a Council Ad Hoc Committee to work with staff on matters typically addressed in such agreements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appoint an Ad Hoc Committee. M: \city share \city mgr \ccagenda \USA Prop Fund Ad Hoc 0501 2002 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: SUMMARY CITY OF MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE The Honorable City Council ITEM 10 - D CTTY f1F mooRPARK, CALTFORNU Citv Cnnncil Meeting of 5 -� -:2ov Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Servicesf April 11, 2002 (May 1, 2002) Consider Recommendation of the Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee to Postpone the Project The Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee (City Councilmembers Harper and Millhouse, and MUSD Board Members Barker and Cabriales) met to finalize discussions regarding the District's financial participation in the construction and maintenance of the aquatic project. The Committee is recommending to their respective agencies that the construction of the Aquatic Facility at Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP) be postponed to allow the City and the District time to explore other alternatives available for a public aquatic facility in Moorpark. BACKGROUND The City Council has long envisioned an aquatic facility at AVCP. In fact, the original master plan for the Park included an aquatic facility and the Council identified the design and construction of the facility as one of its objectives in FY 01/02. To that end, the City hired an architect in July 2001, and performed a number of soils and hydrology tests. The stated completion date was June 2003. The City's vision was to construct a facility that would provide for the recreational needs of the community, including unstructured swim time, swim lessons, and swim fitness classes, as well as to accommodate the needs of Moorpark High School by providing a competitive swim area for the swim and water polo teams. The initial cost E:\N4Lind1ey\PARKS\Park Projects\Pool\Ad Hoc Comm Recom ccagd.doc C N..e " S Aquatic Committee Recommendation Page 2 estimate for the project was between $2.6 million and $3 million. The estimated annual cost of maintaining the facility was between $175,000 and $200,000. It was the City's hope that the District would partner with the City on the project by providing a proportional share of the design and construction cost, as well as on -going maintenance costs. The District's use of the facility was estimated to be approximately one third of the available time. Based on this use estimate, the City Council directed its Ad Hoc Committee members to ask the District to contribute one -third of the cost, not to exceed $1 million. If the project cost exceeded $3 million, the City would bear the additional cost. The District initially indicated that it would be willing to contribute $300,000 and donate mechanical equipment (a value of between $150,000 - $200,000). However, it was not in a position to consider a higher contribution until the result of the March 5 School Bond election was known. DISCUSSION The Ad Hoc Committee met on April 10, 2002, to discuss the District's financial participation. Even with the passage of the School Bond, the District does not feel that it is in a financial position to contribute the requested $1 million and to be responsible for a proportionate share of the annual maintenance cost. The School Board representatives indicated that the District was only in a position to offer $400,000 and donated mechanical equipment for its share of design and construction, if in turn, the City did not charge them for maintenance for the first three to four years (a value of between $198,000 to $264,000). The uncertainty of future aquatic facility maintenance costs and the obligation for a number of capital projects were cited as reasons why the District is not able to participate at a higher level. Both the City and the District representatives expressed concerns about the outcome of the State's budget and the impacts it could have on their respective budgets. It is the feeling of Council's Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmembers Harper and Millhouse) that it would not be desirable for the City to proceed with the facility, as it is currently Aquatic Committee Recommendation Page 3 envisioned, alone. The City has a number of other needs that would benefit from the $3 million it would take to build the facility and the estimated $200,000 annual cost to maintain it. The Ad Hoc Committee expressed its desire to see a public pool built in the City and acknowledge the benefits it would bring the Community. The Committee discussed the feasibility of approaching Moorpark College as a potential third partner. The College has an aquatic facility identified in its master plan. If such a facility were undertaken in the near future, and agreements could be secured, the City would hope to receive an allocation of time for unstructured recreational swim in the summer and possibly time to conduct swim lessons. The District would want practice time for their swim and water polo teams and possibly the ability to hold CIF meets. The Ad Hoc Committee is requesting that plans to proceed with the aquatic facility be postponed to allow time to explore a partnership with Moorpark College. The impact of this action would be to postpone the current completion date of June 2003 for the project's completion date. RE CODMENDAT I ON Accept the Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation to postpone future action on the design of the Community Aquatic Facility. ^ ,., .e " 1. Nr I-- lz . -* i� ITEM /0 - e: •. CTT \' nr *,3nnRFARK. CATJVORNTA city Cmencil Meeting ACTION: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL�0z AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Kim C. Chudoba, Senior Management Analyst A� G DATE: April 19, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/1/02) SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF 2002 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM BACKGROUND The City Council adopts an annual Legislative Program to guide the City's response to state and federal legislation. Platform statements outline the City's position on key municipal issues. If a bill is consistent with the platform statements, the Mayor is authorized to send a letter indicating the City's position. If a bill is not addressed by the platform statements, or if a staff recommendation differs from the platform statements, the Budget and Finance Committee will review the measure and recommend a position for City Council consideration. DISCUSSION To address emerging issues, staff recommends the following changes to the Legislative Program: • Support legislation that authorizes a simple majority of voters in a city or county to increase taxes or issue general obligation bonds. • Support new resource recovery and conversion technologies, such as bio- diesel from organic waste. • Support legislation that implements the concept of extended manufacturer responsibility for electronic waste and other material types requiring incentives for recycling. • Support legislation that promotes low -cost or no -cost spay and neuter programs. • Support legislation that holds animal owners accountable for injuries or property damage caused by animals under their care or control. Honorable City Council April 19, 2002 Page 2 These modifications are consistent with the City Council's previous actions. The Budget and Finance Committee will review the Legislative Program on May 1, 2002, and present its recommendations at the City Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the 2002 Legislative Program. Attachment 1: 2002 Legislative Program ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF MOORPARK LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 2012002 The following Legislative Program was developed to allow the City to respond to state and federal legislation in a proactive manner. The Mayor (or Mayor Pro Tem in the Mayor's absence) is authorized to sign correspondence expressing the City's position on pending legislation consistent with the Legislative Program and /or other positions approved by the City Council. The Budget and Finance Committee will also periodically review legislation for recommendation to the City Council. Staff will monitor the League of California Cities' Priority Focus and other sources to identify pending legislation that may impact the City. Letters expressing the City's position will be drafted for the Mayor's signature, and copies will be distributed to each Councilmember. Pending legislation not addressed by the Legislative Program, or staff recommendations that deviate from the Legislative Program, will be agendized for Budget and Finance Committee review and City Council consideration. PLATFORM STATEMENTS 1. Local Government Finance A. Support legislation that limits cities' contributions to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) and directs the repayment of past contributions. B. Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts the taxing authority of cities over development; weakens existing Government Code Section 66000 fee authority; and redefines any development tax, condition, or other monetary charge as development fees. C. Support legislation requiring the state and federal governments to provide full cost reimbursement to cities for all mandated programs and for all programs resulting in revenue losses. D. Support legislation that safeguards existing City revenue sources from preemption or seizure by the state or county. E. Oppose any change in revenue allocations that would negatively affect the City of Moorpark, including but not limited to the redistribution of sales tax, property tax, transient occupancy tax, and vehicle in -lieu fee. F. Oppose legislation that restricts or limits a city's ability to use tax - exempt debt for the purchase or construction of public purpose improvements. Page 1 of 7 � Nal %.1 "" G. Support measures that provide greater fiscal independence to cities and result in greater stability and predictability in local government budgeting. H. Support efforts that provide greater accountability on the part of counties for the distribution of funds back to municipalities, including, but not limited to, fines and forfeitures. I. Oppose any measure that makes local agencies more dependent on the state for financial stability and policy direction. J. Support efforts to reduce the fiscal impact of Proposition 218 on cities. K. Support the establishment of a constitutionally - protected funding structure for local government. L. Support legislation that closes the loophole that allows companies currently doing business in California to create dot -com subsidiaries to avoid collection of sales taxes on Internet commerce. M. Support legislation that authorizes a simple majority of voters in a city or county to increase taxes or issue general obligation bonds. 2. Labor Relations A. Oppose legislation that would restrict a city's ability to use its own employees on public works projects when such projects have previously been advertised for bid. B. Oppose legislation that requires the use of city employees rather than contracting out. C. Oppose any legislation that would grant employee benefits that should be decided at the local bargaining table. D. Oppose legislation that removes or reduces management rights, such as deciding staffing or service levels, either by direct action or increased liability. E. Support legislation that would reform the Workers' Compensation system to reduce employer cost through the reduction of system abuse. F. Support legislation that limits the ability of employees to receive Workers' Compensation benefits for occupational injuries /illnesses that result from stress, disciplinary action, or performance evaluation consultations. / ^"A ,nn Page 2 of 7 �".4.w0 M.' MR 4. G. Oppose legislation that expands or extends any presumptions of occupational injury or illness. H. Oppose any measure that imposes compulsory and binding interest arbitration. I. Oppose efforts that reduce local control over public employee disputes or impose regulations of an outside agency on such disputes. J. Oppose a mandatory Social Security tax for public employers and public employees. Transportation A. Oppose legislation that redirects local transportation funds away from cities. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources to cities to finance local transportation, transportation facilities, and improvements. C. Support legislation that provides greater flexibility for the use of local transportation funds. D. Support legislation that will help reduce non -local commercial vehicle traffic on SR -118 through the City. E. Oppose legislation that limits and /or decreases the existing amount of retention proceeds withheld from any payment by a public entity to the contractor on a public project. Environment A. Support legislation that streamlines the state's environmental review process. B. Support legislation that would eliminate unfunded mandates such as the water course pollution prevention programs. C. Support legislation that reduces or eliminates local government's Superfund liability. D. Support legislation to either consolidate or streamline the federal and state Clean Air Acts. E. Support air quality efforts that emphasize use of advanced technologies and market incentives, including use of alternative fuels and development of an infrastructure for alternative fuel vehicles. Page 3 of 7 F. Support legislation that reimburses cities for revenue losses stemming from environmental decisions made without city participation. G. Support legislation that provides money to local governments for energy conservation programs. 5. Waste Management A. Support legislation that provides cities with financial assistance for programs designed to provide for the safe disposal of solid, hazardous, and special waste. B. Support legislation that strengthens cities' ability to direct municipal solid waste flow to designated solid waste facilities. C. Support legislation that streamlines AB 939 tracking and reporting requirements. D. Support legislation that would make grants available to local agencies for programs that encourage the recycling /reclaiming of resources. E. Support legislation that promotes source reduction measures without creating an unfunded mandate. F. Oppose legislation that would restrict or limit local government's ability to franchise refuse and recycling collection services, to direct municipal solid waste flow (flow control), or to contractually require haulers to guarantee achievement of AB 939 goals. G. Support legislation that promotes recycling and expands the market for recycled materials. H. Support new resource recovery and conversion technologies, such as bio- diesel from organic waste. I. Support legislation that implements the concept of extended manufacturer responsibility for electronic waste and other material types requiring incentives for recycling. 6. General Government A. Support legislation that ensures cities receive a proportionate share of property taxes upon withdrawal from a county library services district. B. Support legislation that provides financial assistance for local public libraries without the imposition of new taxes. Cvas .;s.. •..� -� Page 4 of 7 C. Support legislation that reinstates effective local regulation of the cable television industry and other deregulated utilities, including financial reimbursement for use of pubic right -of -ways. D. Oppose legislation that restricts or weakens a city's ability to regulate smoking areas. E. Support legislation limiting a city's liability associated with hazardous recreational activities, such as skateboarding and in -line skating. F. Oppose legislation that increases local government's exposure to litigation. G. Support maximum local flexibility in contracting for services. H. Oppose efforts to cut funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. I. Support legislation to give non - entitlement cities the same rights as entitlement cities in CDBG program administration. J. Support legislation that makes funds available to refurbish and improve parks. K. Support legislation that promotes low -cost or no -cost spay and neuter programs. L. Support legislation that holds animal owners accountable for injuries or property damage caused by animals under their care or control. 7. Public Safety A. Support legislation that would provide cities with a greater share of fines and forfeitures. B. Support legislation that would provide additional resources for commercial truck safety inspections and the enforcement of commercial truck vehicle codes. C. Oppose legislation that weakens enforcement of, and penalties for, commercial truck violations. D. Support legislation that would provide cities with contract law enforcement a proportionate share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues for public safety. E. Support legislation that increases local law enforcement resources without increasing taxes. Page 5 of 7 F. Support legislation that would provide a greater share of seized assets to cities. G. Support legislation that allows use of state and federal public safety grants for maintenance efforts in addition to service increases. 8. Land Use Planning A. Support legislation that reforms annexation law by strengthening cities' authority over spheres of influence and ensures that fair property tax agreements can be obtained. B. Support legislation that provides for shared land use determinations between counties and cities when the General Plan of the city establishes a planning area consistent with Government Code provisions. C. Support legislation that enhances local control and diminishes litigation surrounding adult entertainment facilities. D. Support legislation that strengthens local control to prepare, adopt, and implement fiscal plans for orderly growth, development, beautification, and conservation of local planning areas, including, but not limited to, regulatory authority over zoning, subdivisions, annexations, and redevelopment areas. E. Support efforts that are consistent with the doctrine of "home rule" and the local exercise of police powers, through planning and zoning processes, over local land use. F. Oppose development agreements for undeveloped areas in the cities' spheres of influence that do not conform to city standards. 9. Housing A. Support legislation that addresses occupancy levels and strengthens cities' ability to reduce overcrowding in residential housing. B. Support efforts to develop federal, state, and county participation, financial support, and incentives for programs that provide adequate, affordable housing for the elderly, handicapped, and low- income persons throughout the community. C. Oppose legislation that expands the state Department of Housing and Community Development's review role for local Housing Elements. Page 6 of 7 D. Support Housing Element reform legislation that provides greater local control and flexibility, simplifies the process, and improves its effectiveness. E. Support legislation that eliminates the current Regional Housing Needs Allocation process and defines a more equitable process to determine a "fair share" of new housing needed to respond to growth trends in the region. 10. Redevelopment /Economic Development A. Oppose legislation that further weakens a city redevelopment agency's authority to use eminent domain. B. Oppose legislation that would prohibit or limit the establishment of new redevelopment project areas and /or the expansion of existing project areas. C. Oppose legislation that reduces the amount of gross tax increment allocable to redevelopment agencies. D. Support legislation that reforms reporting requirements for redevelopment agencies by simplifying the process and eliminating reporting confusion. E. Oppose legislation that adds restrictions and procedural requirements regarding closed session discussions on land acquisition, use of eminent domain, and disposal of property. F. Oppose measures that would diminish the current authority or financing capabilities of redevelopment agencies. G. Support legislation that gives cities resources to finance economic development efforts, such as business attraction, retention, and growth, as well as marketing and tourism. H. Support legislation that simplifies and streamlines the process for foreign trade. Page 7 of 7 ITEM d, F CITY of NinoRrvoc. CALTFORNTA Citv Colencil McetenQ ACTION- BY: ITEM 10.F. Consider Report from Zelman Ad Hoc Committee on Pylon Sign Height and Location Entry Treatments. THERE IS NO WRITTEN AGENDA REPORT AT THIS TIME. A REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE MAY 1, 2002, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. f.TTY f1r ,%snPirrAx?tr 47 �T - . Njjk ITEM/ A of /ArTTO'ti:�_ —�E - OF THE CITY COUNCIL ria - - -- October 17, 2001 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on October 17, 2001, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Errol Hale, Shiloh Community Church, gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Joseph Montes, City Attorney, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak, and Mayor Hunter Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Wayne Loftus, Director of Community Development; John Brand, Senior Management Analyst, Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert LeMay, Sheriff's Department; Mike Mathews, Senior Management Analyst; Dana Shigley, Director of Administrative Services; Deborah Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk; La -Dell VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation in Recognition of Red Ribbon Week (October 21 through October 27, 2001). Mayor Hunter read the proclamation and presented it to Captain Robert LeMay, of the Moorpark Sheriff's Department. B. City Manager's Monthly Report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 Mr. Kueny stated that highlight the City Clerk's Traffenstedt will give the October 17, 2001 the Monthly Department and report. Report will that Deborah Ms. Traffenstedt explained the responsibilities of the two divisions that comprise the City Clerk's Department, the Human Resources /Risk Management division and the City Clerk's division. She detailed the activities of the Human Resources /Risk Management stating that seventeen recruitments were conducted over the past year with 27 employees hired. She reported the current City staff numbers 50 full time and 43 part time employees. Relative to Risk Management activity, she stated that as the result of an evaluation conducted by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (JPIA), the City received a favorable response to its progress toward complying with JPIA recommendations. Ms. Traffenstedt reported that the City Clerk's division has enhanced the protection of the legislative /historical records and that the records are being reorganized into protective binders in the vault. The City has also secured the services of a contractor to scan the building permit and Planning Commission records. She explained the intent of these activities is to better protect the City's records and to enhance the public's access to them. Additionally, she noted that the maintenance of the City's Internet home page will be transferred to the Administrative Services Department. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: Pete Peters, Moorpark resident, addressed the Council expressing his support for the establishment of an equestrian center in Moorpark. Gerald Goldstein, Moorpark resident, discussed qualifications for City employment and appointment to public office. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: October 17, 2001 Mayor Hunter made announcements regarding upcoming teen activities, the annual Halloween Party, and the first annual Arts in the Park event. Councilmember Mikos requested a future agenda item relative to a letter received from Sunbelt Enterprises that expresses their concern about a Council action taken with regard to trees at Kavlico Corporation. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH- 1994081075), General Plan Amendment No. 99 -01, Zone Change No. 99 -01, Residential Planned Development No. 99 -02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5187, to Develop 250 Single- family Homes on a Portion of a 350 - acre Site, Located on the West Side of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately 3,500 feet North of Casey Road. Applicant: West Pointe Homes. (Continued Open Public Hearing from City Council meeting of October 3, 2001) Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept public testimony; discuss and consider all comments; and 2) Continue this item, public hearing open, to November 7, 2001. (LOFTUS) Mr. Loftus gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter announced that the public hearing for this item remains open. Vincent Daly, West Pointe Homes, 31304 Via Colinas, #110, Westlake Village, CA, applicant's representative, addressed the Council. Mr. Daly stated that he and other speakers will provide responses to the issues of landscaping, the use of native California plant materials; discussion and update of the open space dedication; affordable housing update; the fault study; the water reservoir cross section and the addition of a wading pool to the project. In response to Council question at the October 3 meeting, Mr. Daly reported that the Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD) will not allow the detention basin area for recreational use as it will carry a significant amount of water during the rainy season and a recreational use is not feasible. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 October 17, 2001 He indicated that the VCFCD has agreed to allow landscaping of some of the slopes of the basins. Relative to the open space dedication, he indicated that the applicant is awaiting direction from the City. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy has been contacted regarding the land being held in escrow for the City. Mr. Daly stated that a decision should be made by the City in late November /early December to allow the applicant to go before the Wildlife Conservation Board in February, if the City elects to proceed with the Conservancy holding the land in escrow. He reported that discussions are ongoing with the Council Ad Hoc Committee and the City Manager's office with regard to the affordable housing portion of the project. Relative to the thrust fault issue, he stated that both the City's soil engineer and the applicant's engineers concur that the fault is inactive after performing extensive analysis. Additionally, he stated the potential landslide areas as cited in the EIR have been determined to be within the project area and will be remediated during the normal course of site preparation. Marianne Liggett, TGP, Inc. Landscape Architects, 17000 Ventura Blvd. #205, Project Consultant for the applicant, presented a plan for the incorporation of a wading pool into the recreation area. The wading pool is proposed to be 20' x 20' in size. Ms. Liggett described the landscape plans for the detention basins, which will offer aesthetic buffering of that area. She also explained that the planned use of the California native plants has been developed based on the natural drought tolerance of the plants. The drought tolerant and native plant materials will be utilized as transition to the natural areas. Ms. Liggett noted that the areas of yard and street landscaping will contain other plant varieties. Councilmember Mikos requested that tree tobacco and eucalyptus trees be added to the prohibited plants list. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 October 17, 2001 In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms. Liggett replied that the use of oleander in landscaping can be appropriate since it is a low -water use, but it must be placed wisely due to its toxic properties. She stated that the Flood Control District typically requires a grass hydroseed mix in the lower portion of the detention basins. She also stated that the chain link fence that is proposed for that area could be chosen in a color to camouflage it. Councilmember Harper stated that chain link fencing should not be used adjacent to the basin. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to waive their Rules of Procedure relative to the applicant's presentation time limit and allow them to proceed. Fred Cunningham, Crosby, Mead Benton, 6345 Balboa Blvd, #140, Encino, CA 91316, the project engineer, addressed the Council relative to the water reservoirs and their placement on the property. Mr. Cunningham presented the cross section and line of sight projections for the water reservoirs. He summarized that the water reservoir location will allow them to not be visible from Walnut Canyon Road and that the natural ridgeline will mitigate the view of the tanks from the direction of the proposed North Hills Parkway. He explained that the proposed location of the access is on the back side of the ridgeline below the elevation of the crest. He stated that they are proposing to construct it to extend from within the subdivision directly to the tank instead of bringing it through Mr. Peters' property to the north, along the visible ridgeline to the tank. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Cunningham stated that the applicant will review the plans to mitigate the view of the tanks from within the project area. He indicated that they will review the possibility of a larger backcut and a taller berm in front of the tanks to help camouflage them. James Rasmussen, West Pointe Homes, 31304 Via Colinas #110, Westlake Village, the project applicant, stated he was present to answer questions. Cra -.� ►. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 October 17, 2001 In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny summarized the status of the Development Agreement. He stated he anticipates an additional meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee and plans to recommend at the Council's first meeting in November that the Development Agreement be forwarded to the Planning Commission for a public hearing. Councilmember Harper expressed concern about the location of the thrust faults in relation to the location of the building pads. He stated that he has concerns with homes being built on fault lines. Mr. Daly replied that he will bring additional information back to the Council relative to this concern. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Daly described the circulation of pedestrians and bicyclists within the project areas. He stated that pedestrians and bicyclists passing from one gated community to the other will be required to pass through pedestrian and vehicle gates equipped with access control. Councilmember Harper requested staff to review the seismic issue relative to how many lots will be affected if no homes are allowed to be built on the known fault line. Councilmember Millhouse requested that Council be provided information about the incident rate and expectation of inactive faults becoming active. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to continue this item to November 7, 2001, with the public hearing to remain open. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider a Revised Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element (OSCAR) to the Moorpark General Plan. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Consider the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the updated OSCAR element; adopt the Negative Declaration; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. C .� . . Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 October 17, 2001 2001- to Amend the General Plan of the City of Moorpark by adopting an updated OSCAR Element. Mr. Loftus gave the staff report. Councilmember Mikos suggested that an Ad Hoc Committee be formed to review the document in detail and to address the open space issues relative to the emphasis the community places on those issues. She offered to serve on the committee. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. There were no public speakers. Councilmember Harper that was provided typographical error. park on the exhibit "Griffith Park." He open space be added t noted that the revised exhibit to the Council contains a He stated that the name of a should be Griffin Park and not also suggested that recreational o Figure b. Mr. Loftus replied that there should be additional exhibits to identify the open space linkages. He also discussed funding of the OSCAR update and stated that the appropriation of additional funding will be necessary. He stated that the Council would be receiving a staff request for supplemental funding for what has already been prepared relative to the OSCAR Element update. Councilmember Harper commented that the existing open space exhibit should be updated to reflect the open space areas that are presently being acquired by the City. He suggested that the proposed equestrian trail system and the watershed along the Arroyo Simi be shown as a potential recreational area. Additionally, Councilmember Harper stated that he supports additional funding to update the OSCAR Element in more detail. Councilmember Millhouse stated his support for the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee and additional funding to provide a more comprehensive review and update of the OSCAR Element. Councilmember Harper volunteered to serve with Councilmember Mikos on the Ad Hoc Committee. C Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 October 17, 2001 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to establish an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Councilmember Harper and Councilmember Mikos to conduct a detailed review of the Open Space, Conservation and Recreation (OSCAR) Element of the Moorpark General Plan. Mr. Kueny recommended that the Council close the public hearing and defer any further action until receiving a report from the Ad Hoc Committee. He stated that this item would be considered by the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission prior to the City Council conducting another public hearing. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to defer action pending the receipt of a report from the Ad Hoc Committee. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fuel Option in Procurement of Two (2) Transit Buses. (Continued from City Council meeting of October 3, 2001) Staff Recommendation: Authorize staff to: 1) Purchase two new conventional fuel buses, not to exceed $300,000 using the State Department of General Services contract with Creative Bus Sales; 2) Obtain an inspection services agreement, subject to final approval by the City Manager; 3) Surplus the 1995 GMC Champion Bus; and 4) Evaluate the City's future alternative fueling needs and provide the Council with a recommendation on a possible future CNG fueling station. Mr. Brand gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Brand stated that the City currently has two bi -fuel vehicles that can utilize either CNG or unleaded gasoline. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny replied that a preliminary review to evaluate the possibility of establishing a CNG fueling station was conducted by the City in the past. He indicated that at the time Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 October 17, 2001 it was proposed to coordinate with a local gasoline station to establish a fueling facility that would meet the City's needs and also be available to the general public. Additionally, Mr. Kueny stated that due to the cost factor to establish the facility, no further action was taken. He proposed that with the use of grant money and the City's currently available funds to establish a Public Works facility, the opportunity may well exist to plan the fueling station. Councilmember Mikos stated her support to plan for a CNG fueling station in the City. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to not waive their Rules of Procedure to accept a late speaker card. Councilmember Harper requested that staff provide additional information relative to the Low Emission Vehicle diesel buses. He also stated his support for the establishment of a CNG fueling facility within the City. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Brand responded that there is an LNG fueling facility located in Simi Valley; however, LNG fueled vehicles are not rated as Low Emission Vehicles. He explained that the future hybrid vehicles would utilize fuel cell technology that will become available within a five or ten -year timeframe. Councilmember Harper requested additional technical information relative to the various fuels and vehicles available. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Lindley responded that a continuance of two weeks would not impact the availability of the grant funding. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the purchase of Low Emission Vehicles is an appropriate use of Traffic System Mitigation funds and that the City is developing an expenditure plan for those funds. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 October 17, 2001 MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to continue this item to the November 7, 2001, City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Resolution Expressing the Council's Opposition to Modifications Proposed to Grimes Rock, Inc. (Major Modification to CUP 4874) and Best Rock Products Corporation (Modification No. 3 to CUP 4171) Mining Projects in the County of Ventura. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1905. Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter stated that the City Council's opposition to the Major Modification needs to be added to the declarations in the proposed resolution. He requested that the declaration be presented as "The Council is strongly opposed to modifications to the permit." MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1905 to include an additional declaration stating the City Council's strong opposition to the Major Modification proposed to CUP 4874 and CUP 4171 mining projects in the County of Ventura. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider an Ordinance to Revise and Update Chapter 10.04 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Regarding Parking Prohibitions. Staff Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance No. 274 for first reading. Mike Mathews gave the staff report. He identified that Councilmember Mikos has suggested a minor change to the language in Section 1., Item J of the ordinance. The language change proposed by Councilmember Mikos was presented as follows: "J. Any area or zone where parking or stopping of a vehicle for all or any part of any day is restricted or prohibited by a resolution of the city council; provided giving notice of such parking restriction or prohibition. Parking or stopping of a >A,�A ►� Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 October 17, 2001 vehicle may be restricted or prohibited in any area where the City Engineer, with the approval of the City Manager, determines that the parking or stopping of a vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would endanger life or property, wirer- sideh aiFea is, i n d=ea t e d by apprep ri at e- -signs ez by e paint=- upen -}tee provided that any such area is then indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface." Councilmember Mikos stated she requested this change to clarify the intent of the ordinance to allow staff to establish red curb areas if deemed necessary and to not be limited to enforcement of the parking restriction only in areas that already exist as red curb designations. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Montes confirmed that the proposed revision fulfills staff's objective. Mr. Montes read the title of the ordinance and stated that a motion would be in order to waive further reading. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 274. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Mr. Montes stated that a motion would be in order to introduce Ordinance No. 274, as amended, for first reading. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to introduce Ordinance No. 274, as amended, for first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Consider Modification of the General Plan Amendment Pre - Screening Procedure Concerning Projects That May Have Potential Minor Effect on Land Use and Development Patterns. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Loftus gave the staff report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 October 17, 2001 Councilmember Harper stated his intent in bringing this item to the Council is to propose making the entry into the land use application process less cumbersome for potential applicants and to suggest that the required technical reports be postponed until later in the process when needed by the City Council and the Planning Commission for taking formal action. He referred to the four technical reports that are presently required when application for a General Plan Amendment is requested. They include Hydrology or Drainage Study, Comprehensive Biological Study, Geologic and Soils Reports, and Circulation /Traffic Study. He explained that applicants must be informed when they process a GPA request the possibility still exists that the request may be denied later in the process. Bernardo Perez, Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the postponement of the requirement for technical reports for the General Plan Amendment pre- screening applications. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to direct staff to modify the application form to eliminate the requirements for the technical information concerning the Hydrology or Drainage Study, Comprehensive Biological Study, Geologic and Soils Reports, and Circulation /Traffic Study. Councilmember Mikos stated that she supports the idea as long as it is made clear to applicants that the reports will still be required later in the process. Mr. Kueny stated that a lack of information contained in the required reports could result in a recommendation of denial by staff if they are not provided at the initiation of the process. Councilmember Millhouse stated his concern is the complex nature of the General Plan Amendment process and that this change warrants further study by the Affordable Housing and Community Development Committee. He recommended that the Committee assess the impact this change would have on the number of requests coming to staff, due to the lessened applicant requirements. He indicated he does not Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 October 17, 2001 support the motion due to the fact that he has not had time to study the ramifications of this proposed change. Mayor Hunter commented that the reports would be submitted later in the process when they are required. He stated that he does not share Councilmember Millhouse's concerns about City staff becoming inundated with applications. Councilmember Harper referred to the end of the first paragraph on stamped page 59 of the staff report. He noted that staff has determined that the current processing deposit for a Pre - Application Review is $1,760 plus $7.50 per acre. Councilmember Harper stated that this amount is significantly large enough to prevent the submission of applications that have no merit. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny suggested that the Council may want to allow the Director of Community Development to determine when studies are appropriate and that there are occasions when that level of information will be required in the early stages. Councilmember Harper stated that in the occurrences of a high level of uncertainty, the Council could deny the processing of the application. Mayor Hunter called for a vote on the pending motion. VOTE: The motion carried by voice vote 4 -1, Councilmember Millhouse dissenting. E. Consider Appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee for Zelman Retail Partners Development Agreement and Related Entitlements (Moorpark Marketplace Project Proposed for New Los Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway Site) . Staff Recommendation: Appoint two Councilmembers to an Ad Hoc Committee. Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report. Robert Exel, of Zelman Retail Partners, 707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 3036, Los Angeles, provided an update relative to changes that have been made to the �, 1-. ,r+, a +� Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 October 17, 2001 project. He stated that the site plans have been modified in accordance with comments from the Planning Commission and the City Council and have been resubmitted to City staff. Mr. Exel outlined proposed changes to the site plan. He explained that it no longer reflects a gasoline station /car wash at the shopping center and a restaurant has been placed at the main entrance to the center on New Los Angeles Avenue. Additionally, he stated the Kohl's building and one other large building have been reoriented on the plan to be located closer to the freeway side of the center. He stated that pedestrian access is being proposed to and from the industrial park on the south side. Relative to the elevations, Mr. Exel described them as patterned after a classic Mediterranean design with subtle colors versus a trendy design. He identified the potential tenants as being Target, Marshall's, Michael's, and Linens and Things. He also identified food tenants who have expressed interest as including The Olive Garden, Fresh Choice, and IHOP. Mr. Exel explained that once the center is complete, it could feasibly provide 600 jobs, approximately $600,000 a year as sales tax income, and tenant stability. Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper volunteered to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee. Councilmember Mikos suggested that a furniture store such as IKEA would be a good addition as a tenant in the center. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that the Ad Hoc Committee for Zelman Retail Partners Development Agreement and related entitlements will be comprised of Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: Councilmember Mikos requested that Item 11.A. be pulled for individual consideration, as she was not present at the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 October 17, 2001 meeting of July 19, 2001 and will abstain from voting on the approval of those minutes. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item ll.A., which was pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - October 17, 2001. Manual Warrants 107274 - 107278 Voided Warrant 107372 - 107373 (Pentamation additional remittance copies) Payroll Liability 107279 - 107288 Warrants Regular Warrants 107289 - 107365& 107366 - 107393 $ 48,934.91 $ - 0 - $ 15,408.61 $ 20,291.61 $589,644.84 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider a Resolution Adopting the Annual Investment Policy for the City of Moorpark. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1906 establishing the City of Moorpark's Investment Policy. D. Consider Final "Cleanup" Budget Amendment for 2000/2001 Fiscal Year. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1907 amending the 2000/2001 budget. E. Consider Bids for the Construction of the Los Angeles Avenue Median Project [8025] and the Tierra Rejada Road Parkway Project [8019]. Staff Recommendation: Approve the selection of E &M Constructors, Inc. to construct the subject project, and adopt Resolution No. 2001 -1908. The following item was pulled for individual consideration: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of the Citv Council of July 19, 2001. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 October 17, 2001 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved Wozniak seconded a motion to approve Special Meeting of the City Council processed. The motion carried by Councilmember Mikos abstaining. 12. ORDINANCES: None. 13. CLOSED SESSION: and Councilmember the minutes of the of July 19, 2001 as 4 -0 voice vote, Mr. Kueny announced that the City Council would be going into closed session for discussion of Item 13.B. (one case), Item 13.C., Item 13.F. and Item 13.H. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion of Item 13.B. (one case), Item 13.C., Item 13.F. and Item 13.H. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 8:48 p.m. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 1) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825) F. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited Partnership and Messenger Investment Company, Inc., a California Corporation vs. The City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO23388) H. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 17 October 17, 2001 Services, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, and Director of Public Works. The City Council convened the meeting and went into closed session at 8:57 p.m. Present in closed session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Wayne Loftus, Director of Community Development; and Deborah Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk. Mr. Loftus left the meeting at 9:55 p.m. The Council reconvened into open session at 10:15 p.m. Mr. Kueny announced that Item 13.B. (one case), Item 13.C., Item 13.F. and Item 13.H. were discussed and that there was no action to report. 14. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California April 10, 2002 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on April 10, 2002, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 7:50 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: None. 5. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny announced that Items 5.A., 5.B., 5.C., and 5.D., would be discussed in closed session. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion of Items 5.A., 5.B., 5.C., and S.D. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 7:50 p.m. A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957) Title: Director of Community Development B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Director of Administrative ^ <, v Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 it 10, 2002 Services, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, and Director of Public Works. C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998. D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Unrepresented employees: Assistant City Manager, Director of Administrative Services, ATOM /City Clerk, Director of Community Development, Director of Community Services, Director of Public Works, Finance /Accounting Manager, Accountant I, Information Systems Supervisor, Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Recreation Superintendent, and Senior Management Analyst. Present in closed session were all Councilmembers and Steven Kueny, City Manager. For Item 5.A., a candidate for Director of Community Development arrived at 8:02 p.m. and left the meeting at 8:49 p.m. The Council reconvened into open session at 10:23 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that all items were discussed and that there was no action to report. 6. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 10:23 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MANUAL WARRANTS ITEM CITY OF "OORPARK, CATI CITYOFMOORPARK City Council :Meeting of S -:2eti WARRANT REGISTER ACTION: FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR BY: '- CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 01, 2002 SEQUENCE From To 109078 - 109081 109186 - 109191 VOIDED 107267 & 108701 & WARRANTS 108861 & 109081 & 109191 & 109207 & 109208 PAYROLL LIABILITY WARRANTS REGULAR WARRANTS TOTAL 109192 - 109199 109082 - 109185 & 109200 - 109238 AMOUNT $ 12,461.65 $ 1,927.52 $ (1,363.81) $ 13,025.36 $ 11,534.25 $ 23,166.36 $ 473,473.62 04/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 100022100000 9223 EPC FUND N 04/17/02 1101 M041702 5 /7DISASTER RESISTAN 20 H RILEY 04/17/02 109080 TOTAL EMERGENCY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL EMERGENCY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100031100000 9241 BUDDY'S ALL STARS N M041702 DEPOSIT -EMP RECOG JA 20 JACKETS TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE �qq C ,d r ( A 04/17/02 1101 04/17/02 109078 PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 04/17/02 350.00 0.00 0.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 0.00 04/17/02 1850.00 0.00 0.00 1850.00 RUN DATE 04/23/02 TIME 13:32:21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1850.00 1850.00 2200.00 2200.00 04/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2501 - LOS ANGELES A.O.C. BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 2501 3886 ALBERTSON'S REAL EST N 04/17/02 1101 M041702 DOUBLE LEFT TURN LAN 20 LA AVE & TR 04/17/02 109079 TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. CHECK AMT TOTAL LOS ANGELES A.O.C. NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE t j PAGE 2 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 04/17/02 10261.65 0.00 0.00 10261.65 RUN DATE 04/23/02 TIME 13:32:21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 10261.65 10261.65 10261.65 10261.65 12461.65 12461.65 04/24/02 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 FUND - 0100 - INTERNAL S] BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL 0100 3751 M042302 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 'RVICES FUND VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 5 /02COBRA VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE t a i� PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 95.80 0.00 0.00 95.80 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:41 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 95.80 95.80 95.80 95.80 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100021000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 46.60 M042302 5/02C MGR VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 46.60 100021000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 8.13 M042302 5 /02C MGR EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 8.13 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT 54.73 TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE 54.73 100031000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 4.00 M042302 5/02C CLERK VISION I 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 4.00 100031000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 6.25 M042302 5/02C CLERK EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 6.25 TOTAL CITY CLERK CHECK AMT 10.25 TOTAL CITY CLERK NET PAYABLE 10.25 100031100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 8.00 M042302 5 /02HR VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 8.00 100031100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 2.50 M042302 5 /02HR EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 2.50 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT 10.50 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 10.50 100051000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 46.85 M042302 5 /02ADMIN VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 46.85 100051000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 8.50 M042302 5 /02ADMIN EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 8.50 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHECK AMT 55.35 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 55.35 100051001004 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 20.70 M042302 5 /02ADMIN VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 20.70 100051001004 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 2.50 M042302 5 /02ADMIN EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 2.50 e� t� RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:41 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING L .r 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) NET PAYABLE 100051100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M042302 5 /02FINANCE VISION I 20 MAY 02 100051100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02FINANCE EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 TOTAL FINANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL FINANCE NET PAYABLE 100071000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M042302 5 /02COMM SRV VISION 20 MAY 02 100071000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02COM SRV EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 100075200000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M042302 5 /02VECTOR VISION IN 20 MAY 02 100075200000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02VECTOR EMP ASSIS 20 MAY 02 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE 100076100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M042302 5 /02SR CTR VISION IN 20 MAY 02 100076100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02SR CTR EMP ASSIS 20 MAY 02 100076100000 9231 U.S. POSTMASTER N M042302 5 /02SR CTR NEWSLETTE 20 MAY 02 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE r) 100071250000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N �p ! RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:42 V3 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 1101 109188 1101 109189 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109188 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109189 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 04/23/02 1101 109188 1101 109189 1101 109188 1101 109189 1101 109186 1101 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/01/02 PAGE 3 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 23.20 23.20 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 45.86 45.86 8.75 8.75 54.61 54.61 9.90 9.90 2.26 2.26 12.16 12.16 41.40 41.40 5.00 5.00 46.40 46.40 15.90 15.90 2.50 2.50 300.00 300.00 318.40 318.40 31.05 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE M042302 5 /02COMM FAC VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 31.05 100076200000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 3.76 M042302 5 /02COM FAC EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 3.76 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES CHECK AMT 34.81 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES NET PAYABLE 34.81 100076300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 22.00 M042302 5 /02RECREATION VISIO 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 22.00 100076300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 5.00 M042302 5 /02REC EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 5.00 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT 27.00 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 27.00 100076301007 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 8.00 M042302 5 /02TEEN COORD VISIO 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 8.00 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) CHECK AMT 8.00 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) NET PAYABLE 8.00 100081000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 10.55 M042302 5 /02PW VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 10.55 100081000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 2.50 M042302 5 /02PW EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 2.50 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS CHECK AMT 13.05 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS NET PAYABLE 13.05 100081001003 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 1.93 M042302 5 /02PW EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 1.93 TOTAL PW /CS ANALYST (800) CHECK AMT 1.93 TOTAL PW /CS ANALYST (800) NET PAYABLE 1.93 100083200000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 0.56 M042302 5 /02NPDES VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 0.56 1000 300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 0.10 M042302 5 /02NPDES EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 0.10 t RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:42 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING �'rnl 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT 0.66 TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE 0.66 100092000000 9242 MARIE CALLENDER'S RE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 04/24/02 414.70 M042302 4 /24VOLUNTEER RECOGN 20 4/24/02 04/23/02 109190 0.00 0.00 414.70 TOTAL POLICE SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL POLICE SERVICES NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE /l ! 4 Cj RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:43 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 414.70 414.70 1085.75 1085.75 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2000 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 200082100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02CROSS GUARD VISI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 200082100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02CROSS GUARD EMP 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE 200083300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRKNG ENF VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 200083300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRKNG ENF EMP AS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE s R� J f lL7)- RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:43 PAGE 6 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE -14.96 -14.96 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 0.73 0.73 -14.23 -14.23 15.24 15.24 2.49 2.49 17.73 17.73 3.50 3.50 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 220061000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02COMM DEV VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 220061000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02COM DEV EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 220064300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02CEO VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 220064300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02CEO EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 220064400000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PLANNING VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 220064400000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PLANNING EMP ASS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE fj f� C� RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:43 PAGE 7 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 21.90 21.90 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 4.38 4.38 26.28 26.28 24.25 24.25 3.87 3.87 28.12 28.12 70.96 70.96 15.51 15.51 86.47 86.47 140.87 140.87 04/24/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/01 1.20 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 1.20 FUND - 2201 - CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.37 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 220124300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5 /02AFF HOUSE VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 220124300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02AFF HOUSE EMP AS 20 MAY 02 TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY HOUSING PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING NET PAYABLE �A J c; VJ RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:43 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109189 PAGE 8 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 05/01/02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.37 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1.57 1.57 1.57 1.57 04/24/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 7.25 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 7.25 FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.86 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 230079007901 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5/02AD842 VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 230079007901 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5/02AD842 EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE 1i f� RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:43 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109189 PAGE 9 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 7.25 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.00 05/01/02 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.86 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 8.11 8.11 8.11 8.11 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 240078000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRK MAINT VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 240078000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRK MAINT EMP AS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 240078001001 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRKS MAINT VISIO 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 240078001001 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02PRK MAINT EMP AS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) NET PAYABLE TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE 0 yJ f yyl J RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PAGE 10 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 50.01 50.01 6.64 6.64 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 56.65 56.65 20.70 20.70 2.50 2.50 23.20 23.20 79.85 79.85 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 260583100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02ST MAINT VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 260583100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02ST MAINT EMP ASS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 260589008902 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5/02AD842 VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 260589008902 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5/02AD842 EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKWAYS&MEDIANS CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE 0 0 9f i� RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PAGE 11 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 39.41 39.41 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12.08 12.08 51.49 51.49 1.19 1.19 0.17 0.17 1.36 1.36 52.85 52.85 04/24/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 2.00 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 2.00 FUND - 2701 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 0.00 0.00 0.63 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 270124400000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5 /02CDBG VISION INS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 270124400000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02CDBG EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE 1f j k }c� 4 s 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109189 PAGE 12 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 05/01/02 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.63 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 290124200000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02MRA HOUSE VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 290124200000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02MRA EMP ASSIST 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE 290124202001 9102 CHICAGO TITLE COMPAN N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 04/23/02 M042302 CLOSE ESCROW - AGENCY 20 THOMPS /LIBBO 04/23/02 109187 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE b+ PAGE 13 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 11.70 11.70 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 4.74 4.74 16.44 16.44 375.12 375.12 375.12 375.12 391.56 391.56 04/24/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/01 37.60 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 37.60 FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 0.00 0.00 8.87 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290224100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5 /02MRA /ECO VISION I 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 290224100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M042302 5 /02MRA /ECO EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE �a J c� C d 04/23/02 1101 04/23/02 109189 PAGE 14 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 37.60 0.00 0.00 37.60 0.00 05/01/02 8.87 0.00 0.00 8.87 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 46.47 46.47 46.47 46.47 04/24/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 0.00 0.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 5000 - LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 0.00 1.11 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 500073100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5 /02PUB TRANS VISION 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 500073100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 M042302 5 /02PUB TRANS EMP AS 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE ba PAGE 15 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 05/01/02 4.49 0.00 0.00 4.49 0.00 05/01/02 1.11 0.00 0.00 1.11 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.60 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 5001 - SOLID WASTE A2939 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 500175307501 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02SLD WST VISION I 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 500175307501 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02SLD WST EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL USED OIL GRANT CHECK AMT TOTAL USED OIL GRANT NET PAYABLE 500175307502 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02SLD WST VISION I 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109188 0.00 0.00 500175307502 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 04/23/02 1101 0.00 05/01/02 M042302 5 /02SLD WST EMP ASSI 20 MAY 02 04/23/02 109189 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE f K PAGE 16 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 0.80 0.80 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 12:00:45 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 0.25 0.25 1.05 1.05 9.29 9.29 2.62 2.62 11.91 11.91 12.96 12.96 1927.52 1927.52 04/23/02 DISC DATE CHECK AMT CITY OF MOORPARK, CA NET PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 03/18/02 -19.11 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY -19.11 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED - 102.20 0.00 0.00 - 102.20 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 100071000000 9223 LINDLEY, MARY N 04/24/02 1101 AP032702 AQUATIC CONF MEALS 20 EXP REP 3/9 03/27/02 108861 V 100071000000 9224 LINDLEY, MARY N 04/24/02 1101 AP032702 AQUATIC CONF MILEAGE 20 EXP REP 3/9 03/27/02 108861 V TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED NET PAYABLE l J r f ti PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 03/18/02 -19.11 0.00 0.00 -19.11 0.00 03/18/02 - 102.20 0.00 0.00 - 102.20 - 121.31 - 121.31 RUN DATE 04/23/02 TIME 11:55:59 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 121.31 - 121.31 - 121.31 - 121.31 04/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290124202001 9285 ERIKA AMEZCUA / MARI N 04/24/02 1101 AP030602 RESIDENTIAL MOVING E 20 SPACE #27 03/06/02 108701 V TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE J tdi PAGE 2 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 02/22/02 - 1100.00 0.00 0.00 - 1100.00 RUN DATE 04/23/02 TIME 11:55:59 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1100.00 1100.00 1100.00 1100.00 - 1221.31 - 1221.31 04/23/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD:- 9/01 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290154200000 9283 AMERINATIONAL COMMUN N 03/31/02 1101 M033102 GONZALEZ PROJ #186 20 74484 10/03/01 107267 TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE J r� t PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 10/03/01 - 142.50 0.00 0.00 - 142.50 RUN DATE 04/23/02 TIME 12:10:58 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 142.50 - 142.50 - 142.50 - 142.50 - 142.50 - 142.50 04/24/02 AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 124.32 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 3,046.95 CHECK REGISTER 350.75 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 118.00 ID #9600616061 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109192 1101 04/26/02 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 109193 1101 04/26/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 109193 1101 04/26/02 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 109194 1101 04/26/02 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 109195 1101 04/26/02 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 109196 1101 04/26/02 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 109197 1101 04/26/02 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 109198 1101 04/26/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 109198 1101 04/26/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 109199 1101 04/26/02 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 221C TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT t J C PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT CANCER INSURANCE 124.32 F/T REG DEFER COMP 2,110.15 F/T REG DEFER COMP 936.80 3,046.95 UNION DUES 350.75 CASE #SD020444 2,172.50 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 118.00 ID #9600616061 168.46 F/T REG DEFER COMP 3,433.11 F/T REG DEFER COMP 1,781.03 5,214.14 P/T REG DEFER COMP 339.13 11,534.25 11,534.25 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 11:37:44 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/24/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS J f 1 C FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 1000 GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 11,534.25 TOTAL REPORT 11,534.25 RUN DATE 04/24/02 TIME 11:37:48 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 AMOUNT 4 /25VOLUNTEER DINNER ENTE 500.00 NIELSEN,PETERSON FINGERPR CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 10.00 CHECK REGISTER 40.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 3.42 SANDING DISKS CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109082 43.44 1101 04/24/02 3080 A.C. BARON MUSIC GROUP 9243 109083 1- 3 /02POSTAGE METER RENTA 1101 04/24/02 2837 ACCU - PRINTS 9236 109083 865.75 1101 04/24/02 2837 ACLU- PRINTS 9236 109083 LA AVE & SPRING WIDENING 1101 04/24/02 2837 ACCU - PRINTS 9236 VEHICLE #2 OIL CHANGE 23.47 TOTAL CHECK #16 NEW TIRES 319.24 BUS #301 TIRE & REPAIR 109084 1101 04/24/02 2935 ACCURATE AIR 9243 109085 110.00 1101 04/24/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9251 109085 NTMP CLASS MATERIALS 1101 04/24/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 109085 70.81 1101 04/24/02 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9303 TOTAL CHECK 109086 1101 04/24/02 1012 ACCURATE WELDING 9205 109087 1101 04/24/02 2386 AGRX 9205 109088 1101 04/24/02 1030 AMERICAN RED CROSS 9160 109089 1101 04/24/02 2872 ANDY'S AUTOMOTIVE 9254 109090 1101 04/24/02 1038 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYST 9211 109091 1101 04/24/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 3806 109091 1101 04/24/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 2734 109091 1101 04/24/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 2753 TOTAL CHECK 109092 1101 04/24/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 109092 1101 04/24/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 109092 1101 04/24/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 TOTAL CHECK 109093 1101 04/24/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 109093 1101 04/24/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 109093 1101 04/24/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 109093 1101 04/24/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 109093 1101 04/24/02 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9102 TOTAL CHECK 109094 1101 04/24/02 3033 CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFIC 9223 109094 1101 04/24/02 3033 CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFIC 9223 TOTAL CHECK 109095 1101 04/24/02 1903 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT 9223 ���^v►►. ` 109096 ,� 1101 04/24/02 1116 CERTIFIED AUTO GLASS 9102 109097 �� �� 1101 04/24/02 2493 CHALLY, CRAIG M. 9001 109098 ; 1101 04/24/02 3081 CITY OF SACRAMENTO 9220 109099 L 1101 04/24/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9208 109099 1101 04/24/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9205 109099 1101 04/24/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9632 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:27 PAGE 1 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 4 /25VOLUNTEER DINNER ENTE 500.00 NIELSEN,PETERSON FINGERPR 20.00 RIDER FINGERPRINTING 10.00 SWING - FINGERPRINTING 10.00 40.00 SR CTR VOLUNTEER HELLIUM 113.08 PARKS OPERATING SUPPLIES 3.42 SANDING DISKS 42.57 SIGN MOUNTING HARDWARE 36.47 82.46 COM CTR SECURITY LIGHT CO 43.44 AVCP BERMUDA SEED -SPORT F 134.06 BABYSITTING BASICS INSTRU 375.00 #10 RADIATOR & BRAKES 742.45 1- 3 /02POSTAGE METER RENTA 244.53 2 /02SUNCAL ADMIN REVENUE - 129.86 2 /02SUNCAL ADMIN FEE 129.86 2 /02SUNCAL ENGINEER 865.75 865.75 REIMBURSABLES - NOT TO EX 19.30 WIDENING OF LOS ANGELES A 453.38 LA AVE & SPRING WIDENING 225.00 697.68 VEHICLE #27 OIL CHANGE 27.84 VEHICLE #2 OIL CHANGE 23.47 #44 OIL CHANGE 23.47 #16 NEW TIRES 319.24 BUS #301 TIRE & REPAIR 135.65 529.67 5 /13SEARCH & SEIZURE SEMI 30.00 5 /13SEARCH & SEIZURE SEMI 80.00 110.00 5 /6- 10 /02REDEVELOPMENT IN 500.00 CITY BUS #32 REPAIRS 280.00 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 NTMP CLASS MATERIALS 30.00 VALVE SOIL PROBE -ALL PARK 23.13 VILLA CAMPESINA IRRIG PRT 211.61 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY INS 70.81 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 51.40 356.95 100 EZ -ID THUMBPRINT PADS CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 5.36 CHECK REGISTER TOW BUS #31 3/11/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 90.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - --- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109099 2 /02FINGERPRINT APPS -6 1101 04/24/02 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9205 3 /02STRENGTH TRAINING CIA 111.00 TOTAL CHECK ZELMAN DEV 13.79 ZELMAN DEV ADMIN REVENUE 109100 C CLERK -CITY OF CAMARILLO 1101 04/24/02 1865 DACTEK INTERNATIONAL INC 9240 109100 12.61 1101 04/24/02 1865 DACTEK INTERNATIONAL INC 9240 29.71 CC CLERICAL AID TRAINING TOTAL CHECK 32.00 5 /2BURNS DISCIPLINE,EMOTI 129.00 109101 12.52 1101 04/24/02 1174 DAVE'S TOWING SERVICE 9102 109101 LAPEL PINS FOR DESK VOLUN 1101 04/24/02 1174 DAVE'S TOWING SERVICE 9102 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY INS 131.38 TOTAL CHECK WOODEN POSTS FOR MEDIAN S 85.54 PW CONCRETE FORMS 109102 PENTAMATION - FUND 1101 04/24/02 2494 DEGUARDI, JONATHON Q. 9001 109103 1101 04/24/02 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 109103 1101 04/24/02 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 109103 1101 04/24/02 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 TOTAL CHECK 109104 1101 04/24/02 1179 DIAL SECURITY 9104 109105 1101 04/24/02 2603 DOROJINSKI, VLADIMIR 9102 109106 1101 04/24/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2734 109106 1101 04/24/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2733 109106 1101 04/24/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 3806 109106 1101 04/24/02 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9236 TOTAL CHECK 109107 1101 04/24/02 1811 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 9252 109108 1101 04/24/02 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 109108 1101 04/24/02 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 109108 1101 04/24/02 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 TOTAL CHECK 109109 1101 04/24/02 3097 FIGUEROA, ALYSIA J. 9102 109110 1101 04/24/02 2891 FITZGERALD, GRACE 3862 109111 1101 04/24/02 1525 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 9222 109112 1101 04/24/02 1235 G NEIL COMPANIES 9240 109112 1101 04/24/02 1235 G NEIL COMPANIES 9240 TOTAL CHECK 109113 1101 04/24/02 1252 GRAINGER INC 9252 109114 1101 04/24/02 3045 GREAT EVENTS 9205 109114 1101 04/24/02 3045 GREAT EVENTS 9205 i TOTAL CHECK 109115 1101 04/24/02 1272 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL, C 9632 fj 109116 Jd 1101 04/24/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9303 109116 1101 04/24/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9303 109116+ 1101 04/24/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9310 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:27 PAGE 2 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT AVCP TREE PLANTING PROJEC 51.40 356.95 100 EZ -ID THUMBPRINT PADS 316.03 SHIPPING FEE FOR EZ -ID PR 5.36 321.39 TOW BUS #31 3/11/02 90.00 TOW BUS #32 3/19/02 90.00 180.00 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 2 /02FINGERPRINT APPS -1 32.00 12 /01FINGERPRINT APPS -2 64.00 2 /02FINGERPRINT APPS -6 192.00 288.00 3 /02SHADYRIDGE BUFFER MON 180.00 3 /02STRENGTH TRAINING CIA 111.00 ZELMAN DEV ADMIN FEE 2.07 ZELMAN DEV 13.79 ZELMAN DEV ADMIN REVENUE -2.07 C CLERK -CITY OF CAMARILLO 9.50 23.29 18 HIGH ST HEATER REPAIR 283.01 CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 12.61 CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 9.30 CEO RILEY UNIFORM CLEANIN 7.80 29.71 CC CLERICAL AID TRAINING 96.00 REFUND -SAND ART CLASS CAN 32.00 5 /2BURNS DISCIPLINE,EMOTI 129.00 FREIGHT FEE FOR RECOGNITI 12.52 RECOGNITION AWARDS (LOT 0 84.72 97.24 COM CTR,CH ANTI -SKID TAPE 82.85 LAPEL PINS FOR DESK VOLUN 32.68 FREIGHT (LAPEL PINS FOR S 3.27 35.95 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY INS 131.38 MEDIAN SIGN WOODEN POSTS 74.85 WOODEN POSTS FOR MEDIAN S 85.54 PW CONCRETE FORMS 15.71 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 AMOUNT PARKS HAMMER 25.69 PARKS CONCRETE CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 5 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL 64.35 CHECK REGISTER 50.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 180.00 799 MPK AVE ADDTNL CLEANI CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------------- VENDOR -------------- ACCT 109116 40.00 1101 04/24/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 109116 AQUATIC CONFERENCE MEALS 1101 04/24/02 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9204 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 104.00 TOTAL CHECK 30.85 4 /02AVRC WATER & EQUIP 15.40 109117 147.55 1101 04/24/02 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 109118 1101 04/24/02 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9211 109119 16.37 1101 04/24/02 1298 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 9221 109120 3 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 1101 04/24/02 1312 JOLLY JUMPS INC 9244 109121 104.00 1101 04/24/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 109121 1101 04/24/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 TOTAL CHECK 109122 1101 04/24/02 2014 KIM C CHUDOBA 9224 109123 1101 04/24/02 2673 KREBS, SUZANNE 3862 109124 1101 04/24/02 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 109125 1101 04/24/02 2434 LEARNING TREE UNIVERSITY 9222 109126 1101 04/24/02 1342 LINDLEY, MARY 9224 109126 1101 04/24/02 1342 LINDLEY, MARY 9223 TOTAL CHECK 109127 1101 04/24/02 3091 LONG, DARIN 3865 109128 1101 04/24/02 3082 MALLOY, LUCY 3865 109129 1101 04/24/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 109129 1101 04/24/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 109129 1101 04/24/02 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 TOTAL CHECK 109130 1101 04/24/02 1366 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY 9204 109130 1101 04/24/02 1366 MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY 9252 TOTAL CHECK 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9254 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 109131 1101 04/24/02 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 �>> TOTAL CHECK 109132 :J i a 1101 04/24/02 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9103 t d 109133 1101 04/24/02 1390 MOORPARK STAR 9220 109134 04/24/02 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 109134 1101 04/24/02 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:28 PAGE 3 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT PARKS HAMMER 25.69 PARKS CONCRETE 25.62 227.41 COM FACIL CLEANING SUPPLI 123.53 5 /02FAX MACHINE RENTAL 64.35 CLASS A MEMBERSHIP DUES 50.00 5 /3TEEN DANCE EVENT 745.00 4 /01PW BLDG JANITORIAL SR 180.00 799 MPK AVE ADDTNL CLEANI 112.50 292.50 EMERGENCY SRVCS MILEAGE 138.70 REFUND - SPRING LEAF POTTER 40.00 SUSAN AVE S/W REPAIR 236.49 5/8- 6 /22MTG & EVENT PLANN 745.00 AQUATIC CONFERENCE MILES 102.20 AQUATIC CONFERENCE MEALS 19.11 121.31 REFUND- ROOKIE T -BALL LEAG 54.00 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 104.00 4 /02PW BLDG WATER & EQUIP 30.85 4 /02AVRC WATER & EQUIP 15.40 4 /02CITY HALL WATER & EQU 147.55 193.80 COM FAC OPERATING SUPPLIE 91.72 CITY HALL LOCK REPAIR 175.81 267.53 TRUCK #10 OIL CHANGE 33.04 3 /02MPK PD FUEL 93.77 3 /02CROSS GUARD FUEL 16.37 3 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL 16.37 3 /02PARKS FUEL 127.70 3 /02PW STREETS FUEL 25.25 3 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 11.68 324.18 5 /02SR CTR NEWS TYPESETTI 160.87 4/19/02 PD SUBSCRIPTION 104.00 PARKS TRUCK MAINT SUPPLIE 12.38 WINDOW WASHING FLUID 4.27 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 30.79 COM CTR,CH DRILL BITS 52.08 OPERATING SUPPLIES CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 4.84 FRINGE CURTAINS CHECK REGISTER 3 UNITS BALLOONS FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 144.78 C CANTWELL SAFETY BOOTS CHECK NUMBER MENDEZ- SAFETY BOOTS REPLA CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 52.00 TOTAL CHECK 22.67 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 109135 55.78 1101 04/24/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9204 109135 FREIGHT (PLAN SAKS) 1101 04/24/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9208 109135 16.10 1101 04/24/02 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9204 19.90 MPK PD TO RHF INC TOTAL CHECK MILLER PRKWY WIDENING SPE 171.81 CITY BUS RIDE GUIDES 109136 AVCP UTILITIES PROJECT 1101 04/24/02 1423 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 9243 109136 872.95 1101 04/24/02 1423 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 9243 109136 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1101 04/24/02 1423 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 9243 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.92 TOTAL CHECK 15.93 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 109137 1101 04/24/02 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 109137 1101 04/24/02 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 109137 1101 04/24/02 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 TOTAL CHECK 109138 1101 04/24/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9350 109139 1101 04/24/02 3083 PATCHETT, SHEILA 3865 109140 1101 04/24/02 1856 PERPETUAL STORAGE 9102 109141 1101 04/24/02 1444 PFLAUMER, THOMAS E. 9001 109141 1101 04/24/02 1444 PFLAUMER, THOMAS E. 9225 109141 1101 04/24/02 1444 PFLAUMER, THOMAS E. 9224 TOTAL CHECK 109142 1101 04/24/02 3096 PHOENIX FOOD SERVICES 9225 109143 1101 04/24/02 1448 PLAN SAK 9205 109143 1101 04/24/02 1448 PLAN SAK 9205 TOTAL CHECK 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9206 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9601 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9620 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 109144 1101 04/24/02 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 TOTAL CHECK 109145 1101 04/24/02 1458 PRISM 9251 �;; 109146 1101 04/24/02 3061 PRO FIT CABINETS 9102 109147 f.�! 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109147 1 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 109147 d 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109147 }, f 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 109147 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 109147 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:28 PAGE 4 - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 16.65 PARKS TRUCK SUPPLIES 30.79 COM CTR,CH DRILL BITS 52.08 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7.26 90.13 FREIGHT (TEEN EVENT SUPPL 4.84 FRINGE CURTAINS 17.57 3 UNITS BALLOONS 42.94 65.35 ZARAGOZA SAFETY BOOTS REP 144.78 C CANTWELL SAFETY BOOTS 159.80 MENDEZ- SAFETY BOOTS REPLA 200.00 504.58 4 /01STATE ROUTE SWEEPING 284.31 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 52.00 STORAGE & RETRIEVAL FEES 22.67 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 PRK & REC CONVENTION MEAL 55.78 PRK & REC CONVENTION MILE 122.64 278.42 5 /6- 8EMERGENCY SRVC MEALS 36.60 FREIGHT (PLAN SAKS) 10.38 PLAN SAKS 49.51 59.89 MPK PD TO RHF INC 16.10 GREETING CARDS RECYCLING 178.60 CITY BUS BANNERS 23.60 MPK PD TO RHF INC 19.90 MPK PD TO RHF INC 15.10 MILLER PRKWY WIDENING SPE 171.81 CITY BUS RIDE GUIDES 123.34 AVCP UTILITIES PROJECT 62.27 D BOBABRDT BUSINESS CARDS 101.89 4 /3AGENDA PACKET PRINTING 160.34 872.95 SR CTR KITCHEN SANITIZER 191.94 BUILD & INSTALL COVER FOR 225.00 PARKS UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.93 AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 18.11 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINTENANC 22.69 COM CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPL 64.52 PW UNIFORM MAINTENANCE 15.92 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINTENAN 15.93 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 AMOUNT AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 34.32 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 50.00 CHECK REGISTER 64.82 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 5/31 CA GENERAL PLAN 240.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - -- --- ACCT 109147 1101 04/24/02 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 297.24 TOTAL CHECK 302.75 1- 2 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 109148 1101 04/24/02 1475 R.H.F., INC 9251 109149 1101 04/24/02 1476 RADIO SHACK 9251 109150 1101 04/24/02 1879 RAKOWSKI, KAREN A. 9160 109151 1101 04/24/02 3087 REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CAL 9222 109152 1101 04/24/02 3084 RICHARDS, CABOT 3862 109153 1101 04/24/02 3085 RICHTER, SHELLI 3862 109154 1101 04/24/02 1489 ROBERT F. DRIVER CO. 9233 109155 1101 04/24/02 3086 RUIZ, JUVENTINO 2606 109156 1101 04/24/02 3095 SANDS SUITES & MOTEL 9225 109157 1101 04/24/02 3058 SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS PUB 9220 109157 1101 04/24/02 3058 SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS PUB 9220 TOTAL CHECK 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 109158 1101 04/24/02 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 TOTAL CHECK 109159 1101 04/24/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 109160 1101 04/24/02 1517 SIMI VALLEY BASE, INC 9252 109161 1101 04/24/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9204 109161 1101 04/24/02 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9204 TOTAL CHECK 109162 04/24/02 2107 SKATING PLUS 9244 109163 //xa,�1101 1.)101 04/24/02 3094 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 9222 109164 k $101 04/24/02 2474 SMILEMAKERS 9244 109165 1101 04/24/02 3088 SPECIAL EVENTS ATTRACTION 9243 109166 b 1101 04/24/02 1547 STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE 9103 t� 109167 1101 04/24/02 1569 TERRY LUMBER COMPANY 9244 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:28 PAGE 5 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT AVCP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 34.32 187.42 RECERTIFY RADAR SYSTEM 50.00 SR CTR VCR REPAIR 64.82 COOKING CLASS INSTRUCTOR 482.40 5/31 CA GENERAL PLAN 240.00 REFUND -MIXED DOUBLES TENN 25.00 REFUND -JAZZ & HIP HOP 48.00 1 /15 HESTER MEMORIAL 65.00 REFUND - TIERRA REJADA DEPO 100.00 5 /6- 5 /8EMERGENCY SRVCS 194.70 LGL REFS FOR CA SCH ADMIN 297.24 LGL REFS SHIPPING FEES 5.51 302.75 1- 2 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 17.42 1- 2 /02VECTOR FUEL 65.71 1- 2 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL 10.51 1- 2 /02LANDS & LIGHT FUEL 24.40 1- 2 /02CEO FUEL 25.63 1- 2 /02CROSS GUARDS FUEL 7.01 1- 2 /02ARROYO VISTA FUEL 9.76 1- 2 /02PW STREETS FUEL 131.26 1- 2 /02PARKS MAINT FUEL 106.44 398.14 2 /02TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR 255.33 JEMCO PROPERTY REPAIR 183.93 MPK PD KEYS & DEADLATCH 44.47 MPK PD REPLACE LOCKSET 296.25 340.72 CAMP MOORPARK FIELD TRIP 194.00 5 /24EMPLOYEE BEHAVIOR W/S 149.00 CAMP MOORPARK STICKERS 55.90 BATTLE OF THE BANDS EVENT 700.00 00 /01ANNUAL STREET REPORT 789.84 48 "X3 11X1" STAKES FOR EGG 96.53 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 156.63 3 /02COM FACILITIES GAS 89.95 4 /02PW BLDG GAS CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 SCORING UNIT FOR FOOSBALL 10.00 CHECK REGISTER 10.00 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109168 547.20 1101 04/24/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 109168 1101 04/24/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 109168 59.41 1101 04/24/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 109168 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 1101 04/24/02 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 20.84 TOTAL CHECK 5 /02VECTOR LEASE - WALNUT 320.65 3 /02DEPUTY CC & RECREATIO 109169 MTG VIDEO TAPES 1101 04/24/02 2863 THOMPSON SPORTING GOODS 9244 109169 2.13 1101 04/24/02 2863 THOMPSON SPORTING GOODS 9244 109169 1101 04/24/02 2863 THOMPSON SPORTING GOODS 9244 TOTAL CHECK 109170 1101 04/24/02 1574 THOMPSON, SANDRA G 9001 109171 1101 04/24/02 1575 THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY 9102 109172 1101 04/24/02 3065 TIMID TATOOS 9243 109173 1101 04/24/02 1581 TOMARK SPORTS 9205 109174 1101 04/24/02 1948 TOTAL TENNIS ACADEMY 9160 109175 1101 04/24/02 3089 TREE TRUST 9205 109176 1101 04/24/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 109176 1101 04/24/02 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 TOTAL CHECK 109177 1101 04/24/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9103 109177 1101 04/24/02 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9620 TOTAL CHECK 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 109178 1101 04/24/02 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 TOTAL CHECK 109179 1101 04/24/02 1160 VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC WOR 9212 109180 1101 04/24/02 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9236 109181 1101 04/24/02 1622 VIDEOTAPE PLUS INC 9205 109182 ';� 1101 04/24/02 3090 VIRAY, AGNES 3865 hf� 109183 1101 04/24/02 1631 WEST GROUP 9220 109184 1101 04/24/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 109184 {� f 1101 04/24/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 109184 e 1101 04/24/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 109184 1101 04/24/02 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 TOTAL CHECK RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:28 PAGE 6 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 3 /02AVRC GAS 156.63 3 /02COM FACILITIES GAS 89.95 4 /02PW BLDG GAS 39.41 3 /02MOBILEHOME PRK GAS 212.26 498.25 SCORING UNIT FOR FOOSBALL 10.00 FIRST AID KIT SHIPPING 10.00 UNIVERSAL FOOSBALL TABLE 36.00 56.00 4 /1000MPENSATION MTG 100.00 3 /02TAXI SRVC -16 TRIPS 129.00 HENNA ARTIST 200.00 AVCP TENNIS COURT NETS 151.13 TENNIS CLASSES INSTRUCTOR 547.20 TREEORD CD -ROM 65.00 AV AWARD PLAQUES -ADULT SP 184.66 ADLT SPORTS PLAQUES ENGRA 11.80 196.46 ANNEX BACKUP POWER GENERA 8.04 AVCP RESTROOM PROJECT 51.37 59.41 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 61.50 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 13.50 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 5.42 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 42.75 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 3.00 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 2.99 2 /02REPEATER ACCESS 2001 20.84 150.00 5 /02VECTOR LEASE - WALNUT 320.65 3 /02DEPUTY CC & RECREATIO 314.00 MTG VIDEO TAPES 220.46 REFUND -T -BALL LEAGUE CANC 52.00 CA LEGISLATIVE SRVC SUBSC 245.60 PW FIELD OFFICE BRACKET 2.13 SPRAY PAINT,PLUMBING SUPP 5.14 MPK PD OPERATING SUPPLIES 106.51 MPK PD CLAMP SPRING 16.07 129.85 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109185 1101 04/24/02 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT C t� ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- MEDIAN SIGNS PAGE 7 AMOUNT 248.82 23,166.36 23.166.36 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:28 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/22/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 524.42 1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 12,651.52 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 76.52 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 171.81 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 113.64 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 328.80 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 31.66 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 180.00 2313 AD 84 -2 ZONE 13 202.19 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 2,185.01 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 697.68 2605 GAS TAX 2,530.25 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 841.26 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 466.94 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 874.59 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 178.60 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 100.00 6015 SUNCAL 995.61 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 15.86 TOTAL REPORT 23,166.36 45 RUN DATE 04/22/02 TIME 16:46:30 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 AMOUNT SZABO -WEEK END 3/29 -32HRS 720.00 SZABO -WEEK END 4/5 -32HRS CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 6/02- 6 /03RECWARE SOFTWARE 1,490.78 CHECK REGISTER COM CTR ROOF REPAIRS FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED 1,010.00 GRIMES CYN QUARRY TRAFFIC 1,395.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109200 LA AVE,SPRING RD WIDENING 1101 05/01/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 109200 1101 05/01/02 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 237.88 9102 01359- 0001- 2 /02MOOR RETAI 93.58 TOTAL CHECK 01359- 0098- 2 /02MOOR HR /PE 8.54 01359 - 0144- 2 /02MPK VS VAL 2,806.90 109201 01359- 0132- 2 /02ENV COALIT 1101 05/01/02 2552 ACTIVE.COM, INC. 01359- 0132- 2 /02ENV COALIT 9102 109202 01359- 0102- 2 /02MOOR COM D 1101 05/01/02 3047 ALAN BORNSTEIN CONSTRUCTI 9103 109203 126.25 1101 05/01/02 2977 AMY LISBON / MAR ARECELON 9285 109204 1101 05/01/02 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 9103 109205 154.05 1101 05/01/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 109205 1101 05/01/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 109205 -42.00 1101 05/01/02 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 01359- 0151- 2 /02PARDEE HOM TOTAL CHECK 01359- 0135- 2 /02HIDDEN CRE 2.00 01359 - 0105- 2 /02M0OR -PW 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3806 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3806 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3806 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3806 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 109206 l 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 109206 1101 05/01/02 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 C TOTAL CHECK 109209 s 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 109209 ; 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 109209 C d 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PAGE 1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SZABO -WEEK END 3/29 -32HRS 720.00 SZABO -WEEK END 4/5 -32HRS 720.00 1,440.00 6/02- 6 /03RECWARE SOFTWARE 1,490.78 COM CTR ROOF REPAIRS 50,000.00 FINAL PYMT INCIDENTAL FEE 1,010.00 GRIMES CYN QUARRY TRAFFIC 1,395.00 REIMBURSABLES - NOT TO EX 155.86 WIDENING OF LOS ANGELES A 3,661.10 LA AVE,SPRING RD WIDENING 2,400.00 6,216.96 01359 - 0147- 2 /02MPK VS TAB 64.30 01359- 0135- 2 /02HIDDEN CRE -2.00 01359 - 0102- 2 /02M0OR COM D 237.88 01359- 0001- 2 /02MOOR RETAI 93.58 01359- 0098- 2 /02MOOR HR /PE 8.54 01359 - 0144- 2 /02MPK VS VAL 2,806.90 01359- 0132- 2 /02ENV COALIT 632.15 01359- 0143 -2/02A TRUCKING 229.60 01359- 0132- 2 /02ENV COALIT 95.00 01359- 0102- 2 /02MOOR COM D 2,016.25 01359- 0132- 2 /02ENV COALIT -95.00 01359 - 0134- 2 /02ENV COALIT 126.25 01359 - 0105- 2 /02MOOR -PW 13.20 01359- 0001- 2 /02MO0R RETAI 27.18 01359- 0134- 2 /02ENV COALIT 19.00 01359 - 0103- 2 /02MOOR -COM S 247.20 01359- 0001- 2 /02MOOR RETAI 154.05 01359 - 0145- 2 /02MISSION BE 2,044.47 01359- 0134- 2 /02ENV COALIT -19.00 01359 - 0099- 2 /02M0OR CRA 896.00 01359- 0103- 2 /02MOOR -COM S 803.18 01359- 0151- 2 /02PARDEE HOM -42.00 01359 - 0151- 2 /02PARDEE HOM 280.00 01359- 0105- 2 /02M0OR PW 13.20 01359- 0151- 2 /02PARDEE HOM 42.00 01359- 0135- 2 /02HIDDEN CRE 2.00 01359 - 0105- 2 /02M0OR -PW 52.90 01359- 0135- 2 /02HIDDEN CRE 14.00 01536 - 0001- 2 /02MPK CEO 897.87 01359- 0001- 2 /02MOOR RETAI 530.32 12,189.02 81.002- 12 /01TRAFFIC ENG R 427.00 81.001- 12 /01CITY ENG RETA 2,031.00 81.003- 9 /01ENCROACH PERMI 264.60 91.330- 12 /0IZELMAN DEV 2,682.00 81.001- 12 /01CITY ENG RETA 338.50 91.411- 12 /01M ORLINE SHAS 19.00 81.001- 12 /01CITY ENG RETA 338.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.464- 12 /01RBF CONSULTIN 66.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.420- 12 /01MILLER /PEACH 1,781.75 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.500- 12 /01SHARMA,IPD O1 522.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.284 -12/01 5950 CONDOR 160.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.326- 12 /01LENNAR HOMES 767.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.335- 1 /02LENNAR HOMES 81.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.335- 12 /01LENNAR HOMES 201.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.316- 12 /01LENNAR HOMES 1,498.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 1 /02CYPRESS LAND 19.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.330- 1 /02ZELMAN DEV -TAR 2,194.25 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.430- 1 /02HUSTED RPD 01- 343.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.500- 1 /02SHARMA,IPD O1 48.75 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 1 /02CITY ENG RETAI 2,085.75 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 1 /02CITY ENG RETAI 347.63 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.309- 12 /01WM LYON HOMES 1,304.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 1 /02CITY ENG RETAI 347.62 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.327- 1 /02LENNAR HOMES 39.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 1 /02TRAFFIC ENG RE 439.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003- 1 /02ENCROACH PERMI 3,124.80 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.411 -1 /02M ORLINE -SHAST 48.75 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.420- 1 /02MILLER /PEACH U 2,532.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 91.464- 1 /02RBF CONSULTING 19.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 1 /02MILLER PKY /TR 1,831.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 92.010- 1 /02PARDEE HOMES 58.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.700- 1 /02MILLER PRKWY 150.36 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 82.161- 1 /02UW -MTN MEADOWS 79.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.246- 1 /02CNTRY CLUB EST 6,458.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.326- 1 /02LENNAR HOMES 29.25 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.345- 12 /01PAC COM /MP GR 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.235- 4 /01CABRILLO ECONO 4,094.72 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.246- 12 /01CNTRY CLUB ES 4,923.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.307- 12 /01LENNAR HOMES 1,994.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 12 /01MILLER PKWY 5.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.420- 12 /01MILLER /PEACH 7.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402 -1/02 CARD SRV /GLUC 349.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 4/02 NOTE PYMT - 12,778.89 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.290- 12 /01TRILIAD -IPD 291.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 3/02 NOTE PYMT - 11,777.78 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.403- 1 /02CAR SRVC /GLUCK 19.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.309- 1 /02WM LYON HOMES 1,219.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.052- 1 /02PEACH HILL LLC 24.25 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.035- 1 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 532.96 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 1 /02KAUFMAN & BROA 492.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.027- 1 /02RICE DEV -CONDO 19.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.051- 1 /02PEACH HILL LLC 587.02 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.307- 1 /02LENNAR HOMES 360.50 109209 101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.055- 1 /02PEACH HILL LLC 6,207.83 109209 ''1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.284 -1/02 5950 CONDOR 19.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.190- 1 /02CHAPARRAL SCHO 112.00 109209 101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 85.263- 1 /02AMERICAN STORE 176.40 109209 )L101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 1 /02ADELPHIA -WORLD 10,118.75 109209 X1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 1 /02LA AVE EAST AL 4,765.00 109209 101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.375- 1 /02MPK HIGH SCH00 19.50 109209 1 N101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.150- 12 /01SELF STORAGE 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.301- 1 /02USA PROPERTIES 304.32 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.371- 1 /02MPK HIGH SCH00 424.00 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.374- 1 /02HI SCH PK LOT 114.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.341 -1 /02G MOLINEUX 153.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 12 /01KAUFMAN & BRO 66.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.035- 12 /01KAUFMAN & BRO 4,805.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.026- 12 /0IRICE DEVELOPM 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.376- 12 /01HIGH SCH PRK 436.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.375- 12 /01MPK HIGH SOHO 59.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.027- 12 /01RICE DEV -COND 149.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.381- 12 /01ADELPHIA -WORL 2,341.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.056- 12 /01PEACH HILL 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.301- 12 /01USA PROPERTIE 608.65 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.072- 12 /01ACCESS RD ADJ 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.341- 12 /01G MOLINEUX 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 91.520- 12 /01MILLER PKWY /T 109.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.371- 12 /01MPK HIGH SCHO 54.25 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402- 12 /01CARD SRV /GLUC 582.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.372- 12 /01MPK HIGH SCHO 250.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.373- 12 /01MPK HIGH SCHO 125.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.376- 1 /02PARDEE HOMES 104.75 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.203- 12 /01DALY & ASSOC 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.374- 12 /01HI SCH PK LOT 357.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.382- 12 /01ADELPHIA -PAC 19.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.403- 12 /01CARD SRV /GLUC 59.00 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 81.026- 12 /01JBH DEV -DFA 2,740.50 109209 1101 05/01/02 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.073- 12 /01ACCESS RD ADJ 19.00 TOTAL CHECK 58,479.24 109210 1101 05/01/02 3060 COVARRUBIAS, MARIO 9285 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EXPENS 1,100.00 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.08 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES .30 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 68.64 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 VECTOR OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.59 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 786.39 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.95 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN SRVCS OFFICE SUPPLI 46.61 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES 202.63 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.02 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPLIES 289.47 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 147.65 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.87 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.42 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PRKNG ENF OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.11 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 MPK PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 328.66 109211 1101 05/01/02 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 64.33 TOTAL CHECK 2,148.72 109212 1101 05/01/02 2871 FINE FOODS BY JULIE 9243 SR CTR VOLUNTEER DINNER 1,600.00 r 109213 1101 05/01/02 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 LA AVENUE /BELTRAMO ROAD 1,900.00 109213 1101 05/01/02 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 NEW LA AVENUE BRIDGE 2,155.00 TOTAL CHECK 4,055.00 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 MACARONI GRILL - HUNTER MTG 18.03 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9205 RALPS -MPK PD SPECIAL SUPP 111.35 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9241 HARBOR FLORISTS -EMP REC 677.82 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 620.35 3/02EZ2 MARCH INTERNET 45.00 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01 JENSEN TOOLS -BLADE PUNCH CHECK REGISTER LEAGUE OF CA CITIES -OTTO FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CA PRK & REC - DEGUARDI REG 259.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9236 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9241 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9208 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9241 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9205 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 109214 1101 05/01/02 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 TOTAL CHECK 109215 1101 05/01/02 2995 IMEL, DEAN 9285 109216 1101 05/01/02 1767 J & H ENGINEERING INC 9620 109217 1101 05/01/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 109217 1101 05/01/02 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 TOTAL CHECK 109218 1101 05/01/02 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 109218 1101 05/01/02 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 109218 1101 05/01/02 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 109218 1101 05/01/02 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 TOTAL CHECK 109219 1101 05/01/02 2251 MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES 9103 109220 1101 05/01/02 2431 MEEKS & ASSOCIATES 9601 109221 1101 05/01/02 2530 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN 9103 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 ,r+q 1 d 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 109222 s, 1101 1 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 109222 1101 05/01/02 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 TOTAL CHECK {S 109223 `'s 1101 05/01/02 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 109224 1101 05/01/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PAGE 4 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NAT REC & PRK CONF LODGIN 620.35 3/02EZ2 MARCH INTERNET 45.00 CA PRK & REC -EMP REC 55.00 ALLPOSTERS.COM -EMP REC 13.56 JENSEN TOOLS -BLADE PUNCH 34.08 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES -OTTO 425.00 COFFEE GRINDER- GILBERT,RI 19.63 CA PRK & REC - DEGUARDI REG 259.00 CATAMARAN- LEAGUE OF CA 367.40 MAIL ORDER USA -EMP REC 13.47 DLT SOLUTIONS -AUTO CADD 530.08 RILEY - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 10.00 NAT REC & PRK CONF MEALS 10.80 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES -LANDI 425.00 NAT REC & PRK -CONF REGIST 455.00 4,090.57 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EXPENS 2,500.00 AVCP UTILITIES PROJECT 104,697.90 4 /02SR CTR JANITORIAL SRV 589.00 4 /02AVRC JANITORIAL 960.00 1,549.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL -LA AVENUE 3,020.04 TRAFFIC SIGNAL -TR ROAD 5,311.09 REIMBURSABLES 141.96 REIMBURSABLES 212.91 8,686.00 APPR 47 -51 HIGH ST,661 MP 4,102.00 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEM 4,000.00 3 /02GRAVES -ACCT SRVC 73HR 4,745.00 3 /02CAMPUS CYN PRK PAYPHO 58.10 3 /02CITYWIDE PHONE 1,155.16 3 /02GLENWOOD PRK PAYPHONE 58.10 3/02C CLERK PHONE 7.87 3 /02MILLER PRK PAYPHONE 58.10 3 /02FINANCE PHONE 7.87 3 /02EMERGENCY MGT PHONE 127.26 3 /02COMM SRVC PHONE 12.03 3/02C MGR PHONE 7.87 3 /02VECTOR PHONE 18.28 3 /02RECREATION PHONE 12.03 3 /02COMM CTR PRK PAYPHONE 54.00 3 /02CAMPUS PRK PAYPHONE 58.10 3 /02POINDEXTER PRK PAYPHO 58.10 1,692.87 3 /02HIGH STREET PROJECT 7,050.00 4 /02CITY STREETS SWEEPING 6,156.32 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 109224 1101 05/01/02 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 4 /02TIERRA REJADA SWEEPIN 29.70 TOTAL CHECK 6,186.02 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 11 /01SDI ADMIN REVENUE -87.75 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 11 /01SDI ADMIN FEE 87.75 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 11 /01ZELMAN ADMIN REVENUE -63.38 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 11101VONS CTR ADMIN FEE -7.31 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 11 /01VONS CTR ADMIN FEE 7.31 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 11 /01ZELMAN CONS SRVCS 422.50 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 11 /01TOLL BROS CONS SRVCS 1,202.50 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 11 /01TOLL BROS ADMIN FEE 180.38 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 3806 11 /01TOLL BROS ADMIN REVE - 180.38 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 11 /01SDI CONS SRVCS 585.00 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2734 11 /01ZELMAN ADMIN FEE 63.38 109225 1101 05/01/02 2968 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ASSOC 2752 11 /01VONS CTR CONS SRVCS 48.75 TOTAL CHECK 2,258.75 109226 1101 05/01/02 2820 SCE 9413 5 /02PREVIOUSLY NOT BILLED 1,551.79 109227 1101 05/01/02 1502 SECURITY PAVING, INC 2102 NEW LA AVE BRIDGE WIDENIN - 5,699.50 109227 1101 05/01/02 1502 SECURITY PAVING, INC 9640 NEW LA AVE BRIDGE WIDENIN 56,995.00 TOTAL CHECK 51,295.50 109228 1101 05/01/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 3 /02INTERSECTION MAINTENA 1,333.50 109228 1101 05/01/02 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 3 /02INTERSECTION ADJUSTME 72.15 TOTAL CHECK 1,405.65 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 2 41.32 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 2 /13- 3 /15TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,229.43 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 2 /13- 3 /15METROLINK LIGHTS 141.06 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13 -3/15 798 MPK AVE 112.61 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15TIERRA REJADA 120.07 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 2 /13- 3 /15CITY LIMITS -VARI 22,026.02 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15CITY HALL 1,522.34 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15COMM CTR 1,214.67 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 4 13.64 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15REDEVELOPMENT 82.86 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15PRKWYS & MEDIANS 113.82 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ST MAINT 64.92 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15PCH HILL PARK 426.99 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 2 /13- 3 /15SCHOOL PROPERTY 7.80 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15GRIFFIN PARK 94.54 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ARROYO VISTA PRK 1,761.06 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15VILLA CAMPESINA 73.82 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15PCH HILL PK BLFL 930.49 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 6 12.96 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 5 13.64 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15AV COMM CTR 1,043.27 109229 f 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15MTN MEADOWS PARK 178.30 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /lSZONE 1 17.28 109229 4 \ 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15VECTOR 68.10 109229 i 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 11 12.96 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 7 38.88 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15CAMPUS PARK 53.17 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15CAMPUS CYN PARK 34.16 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15COUNTRY TRAIL PR 13.82 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 8 46.27 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 10 108.79 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 12 213.68 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15ZONE 9 1.94 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2/13- 3 /15MPK MOBILEHOME 733.31 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15GLENWOOD PARK 34.27 109229 1101 05/01/02 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 2 /13- 3 /15VIRGINIA COLONY 11.02 TOTAL CHECK 32,613.28 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z5 PCH HILL TO TR 1,149.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02CAMPUS PRK 803.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02MTN MEADOWS PRK 2,468.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 4/02 661 MOORPARK AVE 42.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z1 PECAN,BAMBI,BENWOO 84.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02Z2SPRING,SHR BARR,TR 2,468.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z3 PEPRML,BTR CRK PLT 137.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z6 GLENHAVEN W EN ING 49.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02COUNTRY TRAIL PRK 1,680.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02GLENWOOD PRK 1,018.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02VILLA CAMPESINA PRK 284.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02MILLER PRK 735.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02PRKWYS & MEDIANS 5,491.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02TIERRA REJADA PRK 2,520.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z7 MPK SK IND PK,LA 420.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02Z8HOME ACRES BUFFER 315.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02Z10MTN MEADOWS COMMUN 7,824.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02CAMPUS CANYON PRK 2,520.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02METROLINK STATION 299.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 4/02 18 HIGH STREET 68.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02 798 MPK AVE 80.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02POINDEXTER PRK 735.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02COMMUNITY CTR PRK 194.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02CIVIC /COMMUNITY CTR 525.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02VIRGINIA COLONY PRK 315.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4/02Z4 WMS RCH PKWYS,PLNT 268.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02GRIFFIN PRK 1,208.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02PEACH HILL PRK 2,520.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02MONTE VISTA PRK 326.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02Z9MPK BUS CTR PLNTR 53.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02COLMER ALYSSAS CT -PEC 32.00 109230 1101 05/01/02 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 4 /02AV PRK & PED BRIDGE 5,612.00 TOTAL CHECK 42,242.00 109231 1101 05/01/02 1565 TAYLOR PRINTING COMPANY 9232 PRKNG FORMS SHIPPING 47.65 109231 1101 05/01/02 1565 TAYLOR PRINTING COMPANY 9232 5000 CITES /NOTICE OF ILLE 1,292.85 TOTAL CHECK 1,340.50 109232 !.± 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC 3 CCD VIDEO CAM 3,513.25 109232 ` 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC 26 PIN BARREL C 482.77 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 AUDIO TECHNICA INCH GOOSE 628.71 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC 100 METER 26 PI 7,303.00 109232 R t 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 AUDIO TECHNICA INCH GOOSE - 431.15 109232 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC 50 PIN TO 26 PI 1,729.20 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC CAMERA CONTROL 6,776.34 109232 °" 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 TELEMETRICS SHELF MOUNT B 351.11 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 ESE 1X4 VIDEO DISTRIBUTIO 151.41 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND- UNRESTRICTED CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 EXTRON VGA TO UXGA SWITCH 433.40 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 HORITA RACKMOUNT KIT FOR 326.97 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 HORITA SMPTE COLOR BARS /T 76.80 109232 1101 05/01/02 3003 TV MAGIC, INC. 9504 PANASONIC 3 CCD VIDEO CAM 10,539.76 TOTAL CHECK 31,881.57 109233 1101 05/01/02 2338 TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX TEL 3211 REFUND UNUSED FILMING FEE 1,200.00 109233 1101 05/01/02 2338 TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX TEL 2609 REFUND - UNUSED FILMING DEP 1,500.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,700.00 109234 1101 05/01/02 1604 VALERIO, BENITO 9102 4 /02JANITORIAL SRVCS 1,100.00 109235 1101 05/01/02 2283 VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331 4/02 Z12 LANDSCAPE SERVIC 3,778.50 109236 1101 05/01/02 1612 VENTURA COUNCIL OF GOVERN 9221 3/02 -5/02 VCOG DUES 1,968.00 109237 1101 05/01/02 1156 VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN SERV 9102 12 /23- 3 /16NUTRITION PROGR 3,169.25 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/5- 4 /2ZONE 1 119.18 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /5- 4 /2CAMPUS PARK 780.26 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2/5- 4 /2ZONE 11 38.77 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /5- 4 /2CAMPUS CANYON PARK 1,925.61 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /5- 4 /2PRKWYS & MEDIANS 1,024.75 109238 1101 05/01/02 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 2 /5- 4 /2GRIFFIN PARK 1,856.18 TOTAL CHECK 5,744.75 TOTAL FUND 473,473.62 TOTAL REPORT 473,473.62 i RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11/01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 4,247.05 1000 GENERAL FUND - UNRESTRICTED 104,110.65 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 6.11 2002 CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT 6,417.11 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 104,697.90 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 14,258.87 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 28,663.39 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 220.46 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 2,509.32 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 137.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 281.64 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 1,162.64 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 61.96 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 458.88 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 361.27 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 7,878.94 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 108.79 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 83.73 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 3,992.18 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 32,143.56 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 69,547.36 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. - 14,789.87 2605 GAS TAX 9,783.50 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 3,169.25 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 12,393.31 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 10,162.99 4003 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN 3,513.25 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 440.06 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 247.20 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 1,500.00 6001 MESSENGER 888.40 6005 UW /CCB TR4340,1,2,3 &4792 135.56 6026 SDI 672.75 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 2,740.50 6148 PACIFIC COMMUNITIES 19.00 6193 CARLSBERG FINAN. /LENNAR 3,853.00 6200 AMERICAN STORES 176.40 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 5,896.96 6302 FELSENTHAL, JERROLD S. 179.50 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 4,094.72 6360 ASADURIAN JR., MANUEL 19.00 6364 RICE 187.50 6375 PEACH HILL LLC /CREATIVE W 6,838.10 6385 RICHMOND AM H 835.75 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI 12,764.88 6407 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING 282.50 6428 TRILIAD /LA AVE LLC 291.50 6431 CARDSERVICE 1,010.00 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 19.50 6460 PERFORMANCE NURSERY /SCE 38.00 6476 SUMMIT FARMS 343.00 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 5,362.13 6515 USA PROPERTIES 912.97 4 6541 SHARMA GENERAL 570.75 c� 6546 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 2,524.00 6548 PARDEE CONSTRUCTION 426.75 6901 CHAPARRAL SCHOOL ENCROACH 112.00 6904 DALY & ASSOC 19.00 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:16 PENTAMATION PAGE 1 - FUND ACCOUNTING 04/25/02 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 11 /01 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS �s r R } FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 6906 GRAHAM MOLINEUX 172.50 6907 MOORPARK HS PARKING LOT 1,839.75 6908 ADELPHIA 12,478.75 TOTAL REPORT 473,473.62 RUN DATE 04/25/02 TIME 09:53:16 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM -1( , C.- CITY OF MOORPARK. CALTFORNTA City Council Alecting of 5-- / -� ACTION: - 2L BY: TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director �1) 5I Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Planner DATE: April 17, 2002 (CC Meeting of 5/1/02) SUBJECT: Consider a Request for the Release of Sureties for Improvements Associated with Tract 4980, Residential Planned Development No. 98 -06, Specific Plan No. 92 -01 BACKGROUND Tract 4980 is known as "Cantara" and is the most northerly of the tracts within the Carlsberg Specific Plan, also known as "Serenata" (Attachment 1). The applicant was originally required to post a bond for construction of trail improvements throughout the tract under Resolution No. 96 -1230. Minor Modification No. 2, approved by Resolution No. 99 -1609, allowed for modification of the trail system which included an allowance for payment of an in -lieu fee in exchange for reduction of the trail system to be constructed. Minor Modification No. 3, approved by Resolution No. 2000 -1750, approved payment of an in- lieu fee of $46,750 to allow reduction of the trail from 10,520 feet to 5,850 feet. The trail was removed from the portion of the Carlsberg Specific Plan that is encompassed by this tract (Tract 4980) and no further trail construction was required. The trails on the other portions of the Carlsberg Specific Plan have been constructed by the developers of the other tracts and have been inspected by the Community Services Director. DISCUSSION Western Pacific Housing, the developer requested the exoneration of the surety development of the trail (Attachment 2). of Tract associated As there i 4980, has with the no trail Honorable City Council May 1, 2002 Page 2 system to be constructed within Tract 4980, staff supports this request. Provided below is a chart describing action recommended by staff: Bond Number Type Bond Amount Recommendation SDO0100544 Trail Improvements $34,500.00 Release STAFF RECObMNDATION Authorize the City Clerk to release surety #SD00100544 for $34,500.00. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Letter Requesting Bond Exoneration S: \Community Development \Everyone \City Council Agenda Reports \cc - 020501 Bond Exoneration Agenda Report Tract 4980rev.doc Y 1'% C/A \ I1 .i ' r• �~ ^.,�Jr ' • �: i�. ` ,. � ni i r � t --•— rt� is _ __ - fy f vt q; r gj `� «i i SIT 1-� ,r N'�• r � i �� _ r•I, _ _ ��� - '111 :.� . _ 1 � .x . • ., .,� r� { 'h Irr;a+y.Y Y t 1 •��•�N8E1 ` � G711.:]:w"' � L IL nn �, , l t' �✓ r �• TRAIL SYSTEM MAP „Western Pacific Housing LOS ANGILIS /VINTU”, COUNTY DIVISION March 12, 2002 Joseph F. Fiss Principal Planner Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Request for Bond Exoneration Tract 4980, Cantara Dear Mr. Fiss: I just wanted to follow -up on my letter of January 12, 2002 requesting the exoneration of bond for Trail Improvements. Bond Number Amount Description SD00100544 $34,500 Trail Improvements Trail Improvements were not required for our development, we were asked to bond for it until the City completed the Conditions of Approval. I have attached a copy of the bond for your review. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Sandy Sanchez Western Pacific Housing (310) 665 -3700 main (310) 665 -3743 direct (310) 665 -3799 fax ssanchez@wphi.com Enclosures C: Brent Reed Dusty White ATTACHMENT 2 670I CENTER DRIVE WEST. SUITE 900. LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 TEL 310.665.3700 FAX 310.665.3799 RECEIVED 1 q 7001 "ISSUED IN DUPLICATE" SURETY fiONO MONO NO- SDO0100544 PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT PREMI UM: $190.00/2 YEARS WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark, Stott of California, and WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING - CARLSBERG RANCH, LLC, a Oclaaorc limited liability company, hcreinaftcr dcr.ignatcd as Principal, have entered into on agreement +V hereby Principal oy,uus to inyLall 0,Nd co-pintr oerLaio des;Q•.eted improvemc:nls, which sbid egrnt.nent dated 19 and identified as Project Trail • Tra1- 44Fi[l , is hereby referred to and ma-de- a par herea and WHEREAS, said Principe -i i:; required, undar the terms of :aid agreement, to furnish a bond for the Faithful performance•_of said agrpoment. NOW, Til[REFORE, we the Principal and the und,&reigned, a. corporate surety, are hold and firmly bound unto ehu G yy OF NN�OgRpARK h•rctnafce culled " it Os p�� jcr, in th- penal sum of THIRT ��UR Tti0U5AN� TIVE HUMORED ANb I6d 1001HS� .,Y -. z.�. passers (s �lsw>u9' money or Cho Unitod States, for tine payment of vvnnen sum well Vn truly to he made, Wo- end out s jv. our heirs, succeasors, e:eecutors and administrators. jointly and severally. firmly by these presents. Tho condition of this obligation ty such that if the obovo- boundon Principal, his or ita heirs, executors, administrators, Mucccz* ore or ospipno, *hall in all thing* *tand to and obida by, and wail and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, and Provisions, in tha said ogrccmcnt and any aiteraLion thereof mode 00 therein provided, on his or their port, to be kept and performed at the time and in tl,c manner therein opecificd, and in all respccts according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and •ava hormlcss City, its officers, ngonts, consultants and employees as Lhercin stipulated, IL Lhis obligation shall bccoma null end void, otherwise, it'.hal� be remain in #ell force and effbel•. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included cost: and roasonablo expanses and fDcs, including r9asonablss attorney's fags, incurred by CiLy in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to by taxed as costs and included in any Judgmvnt rendered; and WHEREAS. under the terms of acid agreement, Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, t0 file n good end SLtfficiCnt poymcnt bond with the City of Moorpark to Occurc the cloim* to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Port 4 of Division 3 of L•he Civil Cock of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE said Principal and the undersigned, as corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the CITY OF M06RPARK and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other persona employee In the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Civil Code In the 11144. sum of TWTR7y.- l=[111i7 'rltf14MI Ft�1 1l�lj�p FR 21jQ�/�nQYFdC Oollars u���� Q� Q — )'for ma- �'cerials Furnis ed or IA tTiareon of any kind,, or for amounts due nder' the Unecnploymenc Insuranat- Act with retpcce to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deduoLed, withhold and paid over LO the Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the contractor and tits .ubcontractdrs pursuant to Section 18806 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, thOt said Surely will pay tho soma in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth and, also, in 03-40 suit is brought upon tiis bond. will pay, in addition to the lace amount thereof, costs and reasonabl expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City to successfully enforcing :uch obligation, to be awarded and fixed by tho Court, and to be taxed yes co3ta and to bo ineludud in thO JudDMOAL• thoruin ronderad. It i; hereby expressly otipulotcd and agreed that this bond 3holl inure to Cl.c bcncfii; of any and oil persons, eon, anion, and corporations entitled to fflc claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to dive a right of action to them or their assigns itl- any Suit brought upon this bond_ Should Lha condition of this bond he fully performed, then tilts obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it &hall be and remain in Tull foren and offect, The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no elianco, oxton5l0h of ti'no, 31t0r0tion or addition to the terms of °aid acrcomont or to the work to be performed thcrcundcr or the specifications accompanying the camo shall in any wise affect it* obligations on this bond, and it doe* hereby waive notice of any such Change, cxtcnaion of time, alteration or addition to the locos of the ogrcceucnt or to the work or to the opccifieotionb. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been fully executed by the Principal and Surety above named an August 3, 1999_ WESTERN PACIFIC HOU INC- CARLSBERG RANCH, LLC, a Delaware , INC. 1 obiltoy comp:ir by AP Lltl, INC., Cal�jort+�i rp flan, Managing Member �/�1�� ���� ray 6101 West Centinela Avenue, Suitt 155 Culver City, CA 90230 / FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY By.--- DAVID C. BANFER, ATTORNEY -IN -FACT 4250 Executive Square, Suite 3o0 L•a Jolla, CA 92037 619 - 642-5010 T &-, -159 . v.r. -.� ITEM /V • D . -ca i970 Moorpark City Council : -'- ' - Agenda Report TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works 1 �^ DATE: April 18, 2002 (Council Meeting 5 -1 -02) SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for the New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening Project T)T grTTQfiT0TsT A. Project Scope: The project widened the New Los Angeles Avenue bridge across the Arroyo Simi, briefly summarized as follows: 1. South Side Widening: The project called for the widening of the bridge structure on the south side of the street [downstream side of the bridge] , shifting the centerline to the south. 2. Bridge Width: The outside dimension of the bridge was widened from 82' to a width of 1171. 3. Six Lanes: The project resulted in the re- striping of the street to provide three travel lanes in each direction. These six lanes now extend from the freeway to Spring Road. 4 Median: The striping also included provisions for a 14' wide painted median, with left -turn lanes where required. 5 Sidewalks: Sidewalks were added to both sides of the bridge. There are now sidewalks on both sides of the street between Spring Road and Science Drive /Miller Parkway. 6 Street Lights: The project also included the installation of street lights on the north side of the street. New L A Brg_cmp New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening: Completion April 18, 2002 Page 2 B. Other Project Requirements: Other project requirements include: 1. Environmental Clearance: The project was found to be Categorically Exempt. 2. Right -of -Way Acquisition: A small piece of right -of -way [190sf] was required near the southwest corner of the bridge. The City obtained a Right -of -Entry Permit to allow project construction to proceed on schedule. The City is proceeding with the actual acquisition of that parcel. When obtained, that parcel will be conveyed to Caltrans. 3. Permits: Certain permits and approvals were required. Project administration included efforts to assure compliance with all permit requirements. A list of the required permits is as follows: a) U. S. Army Corp of Engineers: An Environmental Consultant was retained by the City to obtain this permit. b) California Fish & Game Department: An Environmental Consultant was retained by the City to obtain this permit. c) Regional Water Quality Control Board: The City retained an Environmental Consultant to obtain this permit. d) VCFCD: Staff obtained a permit from the Ventura County Flood Control District (VCFCD). e) Caltrans: A Caltrans Encroachment Permit was issued for this project. C. Quantity Adjustment Invariably with Public Works projects the final actual quantity for each of the bid items differs from the engineer's estimate of quantities set forth in the original bidding documents. The final contract cost will differ from the bid price, based upon the actual quantities required. The final quantities required for this project were more than the engineer's estimate. The cost of the additional quantities was $159,481.71. A summary of the more significant deviations from the engineer's estimate is as follows: Description Est. Cost ($) Actual Cost ($) Delta Cost ($) a. Temporary fencing 2,748 5,192 2,444 b. Traffic Control 24,965 46,110 21,145 c. Striping 6,046 9,735 3,689 d. Misc. Concrete 14,620 34,361 19,741 e. Pavement 27,076 81,916 54,840 f. Piles 118,996 165,131 46,135 g. Bank Rock Protection 19,698 29,670 9,972 other 1,516 Total 159,482 New L A Brg_cmp `^ * -%'%r' New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening: Completion April 18, 2002 Page 3 D. Change Orders There were two (2) Change Orders for the project. However, each change order covers several tasks. A summary of the extra work directed by these Change Orders is attached as Exhibit 1. The amount of the Change Orders is as follows: Description Total ($) Change Order #1 71,324.19 Change Order #2 49,245.00 Total 120,569.19 E. Right -of -Way The construction of the project required the acquisition of a small piece of right -of -way near the southwest corner of the bridge. A right -of -entry permit was obtained from the property owner to allow construction to proceed during acquisition efforts. Staff, with the assistance of the City's Property Acquisition consultant, is still working with the property owner to obtain the property. It is the intent of staff to then have the property conveyed to Caltrans. F. Fiscal Impact 1. Construction Costs: The total final construction costs are summarized as follows: Description Total ($) Bid Amount 1,414,921.10 Quantity Adjustment 159,481.71 Change Orders 120,569.19 Total 1,694,972.00 2. Design: The design was prepared by Charles Abbott & Associates. The total design fee was $162,216. 3. Design Support: Certain design support expenses are summarized as follows: Description Total ($) Permit Consultant 14,737.82 Permits 2,989.90 Printing, Etc. 1,421.59 Other 308.17 Total 19,457.48 New L A Brg_cmp New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening: Completion April 18, 2002 Page 4 4. Construction Engineering: A consultant was retained to provide construction engineering (contract administration and construction inspection). The cost of these services was $218,800. 5. Total Project Costs: The estimated total project costs are summarized as follows: Description Total ($) Construction 1,694,972.00 Right -of -Way 7,490.00 Design Effort Since July 2000 50,115.52 Design Support 19,947.48 Construction Administration 218,800.00 Sub -total 1,991,325.00 Design Costs Prior to July 2000 112,100.00 Total 2,103,425.00 6. Funding Sources : The subject project is totally funded by the Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fund. 7. Total Project Budget Adjustment: The adjustment to the current total appropriations required to fund project expenses since July 1999 is summarized as follows: 73,530 (70,063) Total Current Proposed Total Required Description Appropriations ($) Change ($) Appropriations ($) Design 73,530 (3,467) 70,063 R -O -W 0 7,490 7,490 Construction 1,556,414 138,558 1,694,972 Inspection 185,500 33,300 218,800 Total 1,815,444 175,881 1,991,325 8. PY01 102 Budget: The current project budget is summarized as follows: New L A Brg_cmp Total Less Expenses FY01 /02 Description Appropriations ($) Prior Years ($) Budget ($) Design 73,530 (70,063) 3,467 R -O -W 0 0 0 Construction 1,556,414 (1,261,610) 294,804 Inspection 185,500 (143,116) 42,384 Total 1,815,444 (1,474,789) 340,655 New L A Brg_cmp New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening: Completion April 18, 2002 Page 5 9. Budget Amendment: As indicated in section F -7 above, expense exceeded the total appropriations. The attached resolution amends the budget to fully fund project expenses since July 1999. A summary of the recommended budget change is as follows: G. Final Inspection and Acceptance The City has completed a final inspection of the project and has found the work to be acceptable. The project has also been accepted by Caltrans and by the Ventura County Flood Control District. At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to accept the project as completed and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion to start the final lean period. H. Release of Retention If the recommended action is taken, the Notice of Completion will be forwarded to the County Recorder for recordation. Absent the receipt of any Stop Notices from subcontractors or suppliers, thirty -five (35) days after the date of the recordation of the Notice of Completion, the ten percent (10 %) retention will be paid. RECOMMENDATIONS (ROLL CALL VOTE Accept the work as completed and adopt Resolution 2002- Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: New L A Brg_cmp Change Order Summary Resolution FY 01/02 Revised FY 01 /02 Description Budget ($) Change ($) Budget ($) Design 3,467 (3,467) 0 R -O -W 0 7,490 7,490 Construction 294,804 138,558 433,362 Inspection 42,384 33,300 75,684 Total 340,655 175,881 516,536 G. Final Inspection and Acceptance The City has completed a final inspection of the project and has found the work to be acceptable. The project has also been accepted by Caltrans and by the Ventura County Flood Control District. At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to accept the project as completed and direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion to start the final lean period. H. Release of Retention If the recommended action is taken, the Notice of Completion will be forwarded to the County Recorder for recordation. Absent the receipt of any Stop Notices from subcontractors or suppliers, thirty -five (35) days after the date of the recordation of the Notice of Completion, the ten percent (10 %) retention will be paid. RECOMMENDATIONS (ROLL CALL VOTE Accept the work as completed and adopt Resolution 2002- Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: New L A Brg_cmp Change Order Summary Resolution Exhibit 1 Change Order Summary April 18, 2002 Page 1 Chanae Order 1 Bridge Piling / Method of Connection a Piling Changes: Additional work required as the result of the need for piles 30% longer than those called for by the plans. b Method of Connection: Change to the method of connection of the new widened portion of the bridge deck to the exisitng bridge deck, as directed by Caltrans. Total CCO #1 2 Miscellaneous Work a Warped Wingwall: Additional removal and replacement of the warped wingwall near Abutment #2 (SE). b Obstructions: Removal of subsurface obstructions during installation of sheet piling. c Changeable Message Signs: Additional traffic control requried by Caltrans. d Method of Connection Credit: Credit adjustment to cost for Item b of Change Order #1, pertianing to the method of connection to the existing bridge deck. e Street Lights: Installation of conduits for the added street lights on the north side of the street. f Added Work North Side Sidewalk: Additional work required for the construction of the sidewalk on the north side of the street east and west of the bridge. g Restore Access Road: Placement of base material and other work required by VCFCD to restore the north side access road between the New L. A. Avenue bridge and the Spring Road bridge. h Fencing: Additional fencing (in -lieu of guardrails) required by Caltrans. I Fence Modification: Fence Height extension requried by VCFCD. j Type A Joint Seal: Joint seal in sidewalks at ends of bridge deck, required by Caltrans. Total CCO #2 Total Change Orders Amount ($) 55,994.40 15,329.79 71,324.19 7,304.35 3,228.82 4,665.69 (3,427.70) 12,123.37 4,960.22 9,465.00 7,216.25 1,294.00 2,415.00 49,245.00 120, 569.19 Ci.rorw�ar .... �,...� Exhibit 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE FY01 /02 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR PROJECT 8014 - NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE BRIDGE WIDENING [FUND 2501 - L A AOC FUND] WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the Budget for Fiscal Year 2001/02; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City Council requesting a budget increase in the aggregate amount of $175,881; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That a Budget amendment in the aggregate increase of $175,881, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: day of , 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit 'A': Appropriation and Budget Detail Resolution No. 2002 - Exhibit "A" REVISED APPROPRIATIONS & BUDGET FOR New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening [Project No. 80141 FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER APPROPRIATION REQUEST L. A. Avenue AOC 2501.0000.0000.5500 $ 175,881 TOTALS: $ 175,881 FY 01/02 BUDGET RE -CAP ACCOUNT NUMBER CURRENT SUBJECT REVISED REVISED FY V, BUDGET FY 2001/02 APPROPRIATION FY 2001/02 $ (3,467) BUDGET / (REDUCTION) BUDGET 2501.8310.8046.xxxx $ 340,665 $ 175,881 $ 516,536 TOTALS: $ 340,655 $ 175,881, $ 516,536 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS RE -CAP (Excluding Pre -FY 00 /01 Design Costs) ACCOUNT NUMBER SUBJECT TOTAL TOTAL PRIOR APPROPRIATION REVISED APPROPRIATION / (REDUCTION) APPROPRIATION 2501.8310.8046.xxxx $ 1,815,444 $ 175,881 $ 1,991,325 TOTALS: $ 1,815,444; $ 175,8811 , $ 1,991,325 DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO EXPENSE ACCOUNT NUMBERS ACCOUNT NUMBER CURRENT FY 01/02 BUDGET SUBJECT APPROPRIATION / (REDUCTION) REVISED FY V, BUDGET 2501.8310.8046.9601: Design $ 3,467 $ (3,467) $ 0 2501.8310.8046.9610: R -O -W $ 0 $ 7,490 $ 7,490 2501.8310.8046.9640: Const. $ 294,804 $ 138,558 $ 433,362 2501.8310.8046.9650: Insp. $ 42,384 $ 33,300 $ 75,684 TOTALS: $ 340,655 $ 175,881 $ 516,536 Approved as to form: �,. d ITEM I - - f.TTN' nF o1nnRTARK, r.AT,TrnR%,rk ('itv C'mtncit'�Trrfin� CITY OF MOORPARR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT`__ TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services DATE: April 16, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League DISCUSSION In 1998, the City Council approved a license agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey to use the multi - purpose court at Arroyo Vista Community Park (AVCP) to run youth and adult roller hockey leagues. The license fee to be paid by Tri Valley was 15 percent of its gross revenue received from leagues, clinics, and any other activity permitted under the agreement, less a pass through fee for player insurance. Tri Valley was authorized to make court improvements in an estimated value of $30,000. In return, the City agreed to defer the license fee for a period of three years. Tri Valley's License Agreement indicated that they would like and youth roller hockey leagues third year, Tri Valley began pa} fee. The fee received from Tri season was $2,892. has expired and they have to continue offering adult at AVCP. At the end of the ,ing the agreed upon license Valley for its Spring 2002 Traditionally, Tri Valley offers three seasons; Spring, Summer and Fall. They have not been successful in getting a summer season established in Moorpark because it is often too hot to play during the day, and the court is not equipped with lights, so they cannot hold games in the evening when it is cooler. Al �, 0" U w r, WMLindley\Recreation \TVRHL agree 02 ccagda.doc Tri Valley License Agreement Page 2 For the Spring 2002 season, enrolled. Of that amount, 113 65 in the adult league. a total of 178 players have are in the youth league and Under the original license agreement and the proposed new agreement, Tri Valley has use of the multi - purpose court five days a week. The City retains use of the court on the other two days to operate the Skatepark. The City has the right to request additional use, upon notice to Tri Valley. Additionally, the City is in control of which two days of the week it will use the court. Currently the City is using the court on Thursdays and Fridays. The currently proposed License Agreement (see Attachment A) is similar to the original agreement approved in 1998. The only change made addresses Tri Valley's use of amplified sound (Section 6). If approved, Tri Valley would be authorized to announce their games and play music between games. The amplified sound system would have to be operated and under the supervision of an adult of 18 years of age or older. Additionally, amplified sound may only be used for games and the privilege would not be extended to practices or clinics. This is similar to the amplified sound provision in the Packer Football Use Agreement. As with the other youth sports agreements, Tri Valley's License Agreement identifies its maintenance and repair obligations, use of signs, ability to make improvements, insurance and indemnity requirements, and other traditional provisions. While Tri Valley has expressed an interest in installing lights, it is not ready to proceed at this time. When the City receives a proposal for lights, such an improvement can be handled in an amendment to the agreement with Council approval. RE CON MENDAT I ON Approve a License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Attachments: A ATTACHMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this _ day of , 2002, by and between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation, as Licensor (City) and Tri Valley Roller Hockey League, a California non - profit corporation (State File #1748350), as Licensee (Tri Valley). WHEREAS, the City is the owner of certain real property commonly known as Arroyo Vista Community Park, including approximately 69 acres of developed and undeveloped park land, located at 4550 Tierra Rejada Road in the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura; and WHEREAS, Tri Valley desires to obtain permission to perform certain acts and make certain improvements upon a portion of the Arroyo Vista Community Park, referred to as the Multi Purpose Court (Court), NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: Use: City hereby grants to Tri Valley a license to use the Court for organized roller hockey league games, practices, and clinics during approved days and hours, as contained in Exhibit A of this Agreement, subject to the terms contain herein. The term of this License Agreement expires December 31, 2006, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the provisions of License Agreement herein. 2. Compensation: As compensation for granting said license, Tri Valley agrees to pay City a license fee. Said license fee shall be fifteen percent (15 %) of the gross revenue it receives from league fees, clinic fees, and any other activity permitted under this agreement, excepting the annual pass through fee collected for player insurance only. License fee shall be due quarterly to the City and shall be payable on the tenth (101h) working day of April, July, October, January of each year License Agreement remains in effect. Priority Registration: For all roller hockey leagues organized and operated by Tri Valley at Arroyo Vista Community Park, City of Moorpark residents shall be offered a two -week priority registration period prior to allowing non City residents to register. 4. Reports and Records: Tri Valley shall maintain all records relating to the activities authorized under this agreement including, but not limited to, registration, revenues and expenditures, and other information deemed relevant by the City in addition to the information, pertaining to roller hockey leagues conducted at Arroyo Vista Community Park, described in Exhibit B (Operations, Maintenance, and Reporting Requirements) to this Agreement. The City shall have the right, upon ten (10) days advance notice, to inspect all such records. Such records shall be made available to the City, upon request, at Tri Valley's regular place of business, but in no event outside of the County of Ventura. M:\MLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc Tri Valley shall maintain a method of accounting to the satisfaction of the City, which correctly reflects the revenue and disbursements of Tri Valley in connection with this agreement. The accounting and record keeping shall be separate from the accounts maintained for any other business operated by Tri Valley. 5. Maintenance and Repairs: Tri Valley shall be responsible for all repairs to, and maintenance of the Court caused by Tri Valley's use of the Court, as outlined in Exhibit A (Use Schedule). Said repairs, and maintenance shall be performed by Tri Valley in accordance with City standards, as specified in Exhibit B (Operations, Maintenance and Reporting Requirements). The costs of said repairs and maintenance shall be paid by Tri Valley. Upon written notice from the City that the Court is in need of repair or maintenance for which Tri Valley is responsible, Tri Valley agrees to perform, within a reasonable time, such repair or maintenance as is needed to make said Court safe to the reasonable satisfaction of the City. If after five (5) days following delivery of notice, repairs or maintenance has not been performed by Tri Valley, or if Tri Valley fails to commence maintenance or repair work within the time set forth in said notice and diligently prosecute to completion, Tri Valley authorizes City, in its sole discretion, to conduct repairs or maintenance on said Court to abate any condition which poses a threat to the safety of the public. Tri Valley agrees to reimburse City for any and all costs associated with its obligation to perform repairs or maintenance under this provision within fifteen (15) days of receiving an invoice from the City. Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive the obligation of Tri Valley for repair or maintenance of Court during the period identified in Section 1 of this Agreement. 6. Amplified Sound: Tri Valley shall be granted the use of amplified sound to be used to announce games and provide music for games only. Privileges of amplified sound do not extend to practices and clinics. Tri Valley's amplified sound system shall be operated and under the supervision of an adult (18 years of age or older) at all times. Tri Valley shall not play music with containing any offensive language or intent. Amplified sound shall not project or infringe on other park users. The City retains the sole right to revoke Tri Valley's use of amplified sound at any time for any reason. 7. Indemnification: Tri Valley shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, servants, and agents from and against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, and expense, including court costs and attorney's fees, whether or not litigation has commenced, because of injury or death to any person, whomsoever, or damage to any property whatsoever, arising out of, or in any way connected with, the installation, use, operation, or maintenance of the Court and its improvements by Tri Valley or any of Tri Valley's officers, employees, servants or agents. M:\MLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 2 C'" . V' Whenever the term "agents" is used in this section or in any other section of this Agreement with reference to Tri Valley, it shall include, but not be limited to Tri Valley's instructors, contractors and any subcontractors of the contractors. The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Tri Valley which it may have by reason of any section of this Agreement, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City by Tri Valley, of any insurance policies specified in this Agreement. The provisions of all sections of this Agreement shall apply regardless of whether or not the insurance policies specified in this Agreement shall have been determined to be applicable to the claim, liability, loss, damage, cost or expense. 8. Improvements: Tri Valley shall not make any improvements to the Court without the prior written consent of City. When approved in written by City, all improvements shall be at the sole cost and expense of Tri Valley. All said improvements shall be performed in a good workmanship and safe manner, and in accordance with construction plans and specifications approved by the City. All work shall be inspected by the City and the donated Court improvements shall be accepted by City upon notice that all liens and claims have been satisfied by Tri Valley. Upon completion and acceptance of the Court improvements, the City shall assume full ownership of said improvements. 9. Signs and Advertising: Tri Valley shall not allow the construction or placement of any sign, signboard, or other form of outdoor advertising on or around the Court, including on baseboards, fence, and scoreboard. In the event of a violation of this provision by Tri Valley or anyone claiming under Tri Valley, Tri Valley hereby authorizes City as Tri Valley's agent, to enter the Court and to remove and dispose of any such sign, signboard or other advertising, and to charge the cost and expense of any such removal and disposal to Tri Valley. Tri Valley shall pay the same to City. This provision does not exclude the use of identification banners for individual teams and sponsors, which may be displayed during games and shall be removed following the end of each game. 10. Independent Contractor: Tri Valley shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor its officers, employees, servants or agents shall have control over the conduct of Tri Valley or any of Tri Valley's officers, employees, servants, or agents. MAMLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 3 Tri Valley shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents is in any manner an employee of the City. The City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage or other compensation to any person employed by Tri Valley performing services hereunder. 11. Liability Insurance: Prior to commencing Court improvements, Tri Valley shall furnish to the City Clerk certificates and endorsements of the policies of insurance required by this section, which insurance policies shall be secured from a good and responsible A+ company as rated by Best's Insurance Guide and duly authorized to do insurance business in the State of California. Tri Valley shall pay for said policies and maintain each in full force and effect for the duration of the term of the Agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policies shall: 1) Name City and its officers, employees, servants and agents as additional insured with Tri Valley; 2) Insure City and Tri Valley and their respective officers, employees, servants and agents while acting in the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses arising from, or in any way connected with, the performance of this Agreement by Tri Valley or City; 3) Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider, executed by a duly authorized officer of the insurance company, whereby it is provided that such policy provides primary coverage and that any other policy that may afford coverage to the City, shall be excess over, and not concurrent with, such policy; and 4) Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider, executed by a duly authorized officer of the insurance company, whereby it is provided that, in the event of proposed amendment or cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before the amendment or cancellation is effective. Consistent with the provisions of this Section, Tri Valley shall provide public liability and property damage insurance as follows: Bodily Injury $1,000,000 each person $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage $1,000,000 each occurrence M:\MLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 4 $1,000,000 aggregate A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in the amount $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the required minimum limits. The insurance policy(s) shall be written on an occurrence basis. 12. Workers Compensation: Tri Valley and its subcontractor(s), shall provide complete workers compensation insurance or a certificate of consent to self - insurance by the director of Industrial Relations in accordance with the requirements of Section 3800 of the California Labor Code. Tri Valley shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents from any claim resulting from failure of either Tri Valley or Tri Valley's employees, servants, or agents, to take out or maintain such insurance. 13. Default Notice: Either party may give notice to the other party of any default under this Agreement. In the event that the party in default fails to cure the default within ten (10) days after delivery of the notice to the City Council, this Agreement shall terminate at the option of the non - faulting party. 14. Arbitrator: Cases involving a dispute between the City and Tri Valley may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgement of the arbitrator. 15. Assignment: The license granted herein is personal to Tri Valley and shall not be assigned. Any attempt to assign the license or allow use of the Court for other than designated leagues, during the time periods outlined in Exhibit A, shall automatically terminate the license. No legal title, easement or leasehold interest in the Court and underlying real property is created or vested in Tri Valley by the grant of the license. 16. Notice: Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other documents to be delivered, shall be delivered in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: TO: City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Att: Director of Community Services TO: Tri Valley Roller Hockey Association 2509 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd, Suite 222 Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 MAMLindlcy\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 5 Att: Walt Collins, Vice President Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address, which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or upon deposit in the United States mail. Additionally, Tri Valley agrees to provide the City with twenty-four (24) hour contact phone numbers of an employee(s) who is authorized to respond to emergencies. 17. Modification: This agreement may be terminated, extended or amended in writing by the mutual written consent of the parties hereto. Such termination, extension or amendment may be executed by the City Manager on behalf of the City. 18. Paragraph Headings: Paragraph headings in the agreement are for convenience only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants and conditions of this agreement. 19. Venue: The laws of the State of California shall govern this agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Ventura. In the event of litigation in U.S. District Court, exclusive venue shall lie in the Central District of California. 20. Complete Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This Agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. 21. Interpretation: Should interpretation of this agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared. 22. Waiver: No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar; nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 23. Attorney's Fees: In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of, any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement, or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled KNLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 6 X-1k v to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgments or decrees rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. 24. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the City at any time with no less than ninety (90) days written notice of such termination. 25. Partial Invalidity: If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. LICENSOR City Manager, City of Moorpark ATTEST: Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk LICENSEE Vice President, Tri Valley Roller Hockey League MA\MLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 7 EXHIBIT A USE SCHEDULE Tri Valley shall have the right to use the Court, for the exclusive purpose of operating roller hockey leagues games, practices, and clinics during approved hours between the hours of 3 p.m. and dusk on week days, and for a maximum of twelve approved hours on Saturdays and Sundays. City sponsored and co- sponsored programs and events have priority use of the Court. To initiate its right to use the Court, three weeks prior to the first day of each season, Tri Valley shall provide to the City, in writing, its proposed Roller Hockey League season schedule identifying specific times and days of the week the use of the Court will be needed based on enrollment, including dates for pre - season try outs, practices, games, and clinics. The City's Community Services Director will approve days and times to be designated for Tri Valley's use, at her /his sole discretion and consistent with the terms of this License. Additionally, upon the receipt of a written request from Tri Valley, the City may, at its sole discretion, consider amendments to the approved schedule, and will approve the requested schedule amendment as long as no other commitment has been previously been entered into or approved by the City and does not conflict with any planned City of City co- sponsored event. In no event shall the City's Director of Community Services approve use of the Court by Tri Valley during days or hours that AVCP is not open to the public. Tri Valley's use of the Court is restricted to youth and adult roller hockey league games or practices by teams or individuals registered in Tri Valley's Moorpark Leagues, and instructional clinics held within the days and times approved above by the City's Director of Community Services. Tri Valley shall not rent the Court to any group. 2. The City shall retain the right to schedule and hold City sponsored and co- sponsored activities on the Court during time approved for Tri Valley's use, provided Tri Valley is notified in writing no less than three weeks before the start of its then current season, and an alternate time, as determined by City in its sole discretion, is made available to Tri Valley. 3. If on any given date during the time that Tri Valley has exclusive use of the Court, it has no approved activity scheduled, the City shall have the sole right to grant use of the Court to another group for any use. 4. No practices, games, clinics, or any other activity authorized under this license shall take place on the Court on City observed holidays, without written approval by the City's Director of Community Services. MA\MLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 8 EXHIBIT B OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. Tri Valley shall to take full responsibility for operating roller hockey leagues and clinics. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to: a. Promoting and advertising leagues and clinics b. Processing registrations C. Collecting and reporting fees d. Recruiting and training coaches e. Recruiting and training referees f. Preparing and processing any potential refunds g. Holding player evaluations h. Conducting parent and player meetings I. Providing all customer service including inquiries and complaint resolution J. Purchasing jerseys, trophies, pictures, and any other roller hockey supplies 2. Maintenance of, and repairs to the Court shall include but not limited to: the fence, court game lines, dasher boards, and any other improvements that may be approved by the City. All repair and maintenance work shall be performed in a good workmanlike manner and shall meet City standards. 3. At a minimum, Tri Valley shall perform the following maintenance and repair duties at the Court: a. Sweep the Court surface, including the player box area each day of use under this agreement. b. Empty trash cans at the Court and dispose of contents in the dumpster located in the parking lot at AVCP on each day of use. C. Inspect the dasher boards, including all nuts, bolts, hinges, and other fasteners twice MAMLindley\Recreation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 9 a week. Tighten and replace components when warranted. d. Repaint dasher boards at least once a year, or more often, if determined warranted by the City. e. Repair and replace all chain link fencing, as needed. f. Repaint court game lines at least once every two years, or more frequently if needed. 4. Tri Valley shall provide a written report to the City regarding information about each season. This report will be due to the City thirty (30) workdays following the end of the just completed season. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: a. Tri Valley's expenses for operations under this agreement. This report shall include profit and loss, and revenue and expense information directly related to the use of the Court pursuant to this agreement. a. Number of players and teams by age division C. Total dollar amount of league fees collected, less player insurance fees d. Number of clinics held during the season e. Number of clinic participants f. Total dollar amount of clinic fees collected MAMLindley\Recrcation \Youth Sports Agr \TRIVAL AGR 2002.doc 10 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM --I-L' CITY OF MOORPARK. rALWORNIA Citv Council Weting of ACTION: P", . �7 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services.' DATE: April 12, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Plans and Specification for City Hall Annex Generator Connection and Award a Contract to Venco Electric DISCUSSION The City Council is being asked for the connection of the City award a contract for the work to exceed $9,680. to approve the electrical plans Hall Annex to the generator and Venco Electric at a cost not to At its meeting on October 3, 2001, the City Council approved the appropriation of $4,400 to prepare the electrical plan for the connection of the Annex to the City Hall generator to provide back -up power in the event of power disruptions, such as those experienced in the summer of 2001. The City awarded a contract to Lundeen & Arnold Electrical Engineers at a cost not to exceed $3,500. The completed design has been previously provided to the City Council under separate cover. The City conducted a bid process for the received two bids by the closing date successful low bidder is Venco Electric at bid received was for a price of $17,36, estimate was $15,000. However, staff had that it believed that estimate was high and that the cost would be closer to $10,000. connection work and of April 10. The $9,680.00. The other 4.74. The engineer's previously indicated that it was believed Annex Back -up Power Page 2 In the FY 2001/02 Budget, the City appropriated $20,000 for energy conservation measures. Staff proposes using $9,680 from that amount to fund the annex connection work. STAFF RECObMNDATION Approve the design plans for the City Hall Annex back -up power system; award a contract to Venco Electric at a cost not to exceed $9,680; authorize the City Manager to execute said contract on behalf of the City; and approve the use of energy conservation measure moneys in the FY 2001/02 budget for the generator project. I \ \mor _pri_serv\ home_ folders \MLindley \Facilities\Annex Power \award contract annex back up power ccagd.doc ITEM t r G' - - rTTY of monRPARK, C'AT,TFORNTA City C'nnneil Meeting ACTION: Z MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst Date: April 22, 2002 (City Council Meeting of May 1, 2002) Subject: CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE USE OF $20,000 IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED TO THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOR ROOF /CEILING REPAIRS TO THE CLUB'S TEEN CENTER BACKGROUND On March 7, 2001, the City Council allocated previously unprogrammed funds for a renovation project at the Boys & Girls Club. This project was identified as the replacement of windows in the gym. DISCUSSION Due to the fact that the Club allows the gym to groups when not being used by Club members, i t that the window replacement project would be CDBG guidelines. Eligibility for CDBG funding a determination that at least fifty percent beneficiaries of the funds are low income. projects are monitored from time to time eligibility. Without verifying income informa Club users of the gym, those groups woul d ineligible, as the organizations represented d income information of their members. be used by other was determined ineligible under is contingent on (50 %) of the Public Service to confirm this tion of the non - be considered o not track the Repairs to the Club's Teen Center (a detached modular building) are considered eligible for CDBG funds, as Club members, almost exclusively, use this building. (The one exception is a small weekly meeting of PDAP Drug Counseling participants. These participants are thought to be likely eligible under CDBG Honorable City Council Date 04/22/02 Page 2 regulations, as the City has approved this organization for CDBG funds previously.) The Club has requested that the funds previously authorized for window replacement in the gym be approved, instead, to provide needed roof and ceiling repairs for the Teen Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the use of $20,000 (FY 2000 - 2001), previously allocated to the Boys and Girls Club for window replacement in the gym, for roof and ceiling repairs for the Teen Center. ITEM P• 4• CTTV or'► ooRrARK. CAT,TFORN'TA City C011ncil merting of ACTNIN: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Fv: To: The Honorable City Council From: Bob LeMay, Acting Chief of Police Date: April 22, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) Subject: Consider Amending Previously Approved CLEEPS Expenditures DISCUSSION: In September of 2000, The City of Moorpark received funds from a state grant, CLEEPS (California Law Enforcement Equipment Program), in the amount of $110,300. The original objective of the program was to provide one -time competitive grants to law enforcement agencies for the acquisition of high -tech equipment used for both criminal justice items and emergency responses. It was generally accepted that this award had to be spent within two ( 2 ) years. In July of 2001, your Honorable Council approved spending a large portion of the original amount on numerous upgrades involving items that would benefit both the City's Police Department, as well as the City's Emergency Operations Center. Part of the original amount approved was $11,000.00 toward a Laser Mapping /Measuring Device to be used for in major accidents and critical incidents. Since that time, the Ventura County Sheriff's Department has acquired some of these devices on their own, one of which is in use at the East County Patrol Station in Thousand Oaks. In conversations with the Sheriff's Department, I have been assured that the device would be offered and made available to investigators involving such incidents in City of Moorpark as part of the overhead services. 4 ko % P✓ J Honorable City Council CLEEPS Grant April 22, 2002 Page 2 Secondly, we did not purchase one of the designated five (5) radar guns, $2,300.00 and the laser speed gun, $2,500.00, for a combined savings of $4,800.00. This makes the total saving at $15,800.00. In light of this new information, and our financial responsibility to the City, my staff and I no longer feel there is a need for the City to purchase any of these devices and make the following recommendations as alternatives: Item #1 - Time Lapse Video System Justification- Surveillance video systems are now commonplace in most businesses, both large and small throughout Moorpark. Almost all surveillance systems use multiple cameras and record their image so they can be reviewed at a later time when a crime is discovered. Most systems use a time -lapse video recorder to capture these images. These systems vary greatly and there is no industry standard to which format a time -lapse tape is recorded. When a crime occurs and a videotape is recovered as evidence, there are up to 40 different formats that the video could have been recorded in. Reviewing a surveillance tape on the original system it was recorded on is not always possible or practical. To begin the process of reviewing a tape, several pieces of video equipment are needed. It then commonly takes hours of reviewing a tape to find the correct cameras to watch and then the video images need to be transferred to a still photograph for identification of a suspect and evidence purposes in court. If the tape can be reviewed on the original surveillance system there is no way to transfer the pictures for later use. The video system that we are interested in purchasing gives us the capability to review any videotape format available today. The system allows still photographs to be printed or converted to a standard VHS format for review on any standard VHS player. Additionally, any tape can be converted to a digital image and then stored on a digital hard drive. The photographs can then be enhanced to make the image clearer and make suspect Honorable City Council CLEEPS Grant April 22, 2002 Page 3 identification possible. It is not uncommon to have a video with the picture of a suspect, but the suspect is too far away and identification is not possible. By digitally enhancing the video it makes identification easier and also allows the images to be sent via e -mail to any other law enforcement agency. In the last year we have solved a number of crimes because of surveillance videos. A felony vandalism at Moorpark High School showed the students as they entered the school during the middle of the night and caused $13,000.00 in damage. A string of over 25 vehicle burglaries was solved after the suspect used a victim's credit card at the Ralph's grocery store in Moorpark. We were able to identify the suspect using his picture captured on the stores surveillance system. And most recently a stabbing on Moorpark Avenue occurred and one of the suspects was captured on a Laundromat's video surveillance system as he fled the scene. Currently we have no capability of reviewing videotapes at the station. We routinely spend time at East County Sheriff's Station or the Crime Lab in Ventura reviewing tapes and printing photographs. The ability to have an in house system will greatly improve our ability to promptly review evidence and reduce our time away from the city. Total Package Cost - $8,100.00 Item #2 - Mobil Data Computers Justification - These Mobil Data computers will allow the officers immediate access to driver, vehicle, state, county criminal records, and warrant information. The County has issued similar data computers to both investigators and patrol units. This was accomplished through a county grant and the funds restricted the number of units issued to investigators and patrol only. Our school resources officers (SRO's) encounter the same needs for information in a timely manner as do our patrol officers and investigators. This need is increased by the fact that the SRO's are isolated in a campus environment. Currently the SRO's have to call Ventura records and have a records technician i.VV N.J Honorable City Council CLEEPS Grant April 22, 2002 Page 4 research the information. With the CDPD the information is available at the officers fingertips right at his /her work site. CDPD Laptops Panasonic CF -27 $3,893.00 each RAM upgrade 114.00 each Sub -Total $7,900.00 Video System $8,100.00 Total $16,000.00 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve said modifications to the purchasing of the listed equipment with the mentioned CLEEPS funds as contained in this report. CTT\' nF mnnRrlRK. r.At,Trnu''TA city Cnnnril Nfertint► of S ACTTn'K: rl PPhb V MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT By, TO: The Honorable City Council / FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager L��G DATE: April 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Granting Additional Administrative Leave to Designated Employees DISCUSSION: On several occasions in the past, the City Council has recognized the extra work efforts of City staff members necessitated as a result of vacancies in management positions. This has usually been recognized by awarding additional administrative leave. With the vacancy in the Director of Community Development position (October 2001), the ATCM /CC was appointed acting Director of Community Development. She was given a temporary 20 percent salary adjustment during the period of dual service. On December 2001, the Planning Manager position was vacated. The position was subsequently filled in March 2002. During this period, the Senior Management Analyst position in the Community Development Department assumed several of the administrative duties of the vacant position. She was granted a temporary 20 percent salary increase during this period. It is recommended that both the ATCM /CC and the referenced Senior Management Analyst be granted an additional week of administrative leave with the stipulation that such leave be used by December 31, 2002. The City Manager also assumed additional responsibilities during the vacancy of the Director of Community Development position. City Council Agenda Report April 25, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) Re: Granting Additional Administrative Leave Page 2 It is requested that two weeks of additional administrative leave be granted with the provision it is used by December 31, 2002, or cashed out. The Recreation Superintendent position has been vacant since December 2001. During this period, the Director of Community Services has assumed extra responsibilities. It is recommended that two weeks of administrative leave be granted with the provision it is used by December 31, 2002, or cashed out. During the period of August 2001 to January 2002, the Accounting Manager and Budget and Finance Manager positions were vacant. The Director of Administrative Services assumed greater responsibilities and duties during this period. The Budget and Finance Manager position remains vacant. It is recommended that the Director of Administrative Services be granted three weeks of additional administrative leave with the provision that it be used by December 31, 2002, or cashed out. Any cash out of the administrative leave by any of the affected staff would be covered by salary savings as a result of the referenced vacancies during FY 2001 -02. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve granting of additional administrative leave consistent with this report. SK:db M:\ cityshare \citymgr \ccagenda \Addt1 Admin Leave 0501 2002 ITEM I V 5. r,ity Cmirtril Nicetirne of ACTION- CITY OF MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPOR TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services ��� DATE: April 12, 2002 (CC Meeting of May 1, 2002) SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award a Contract, and Adopt a Budget Resolution for the Construction of the Restroom /Concession /Storage Facility at Arroyo Vista Community Park SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to approve the plans and specifications for the AVCP Phase II restroom /concession/ storage facility; award a contract to Tasco Construction, Inc., to perform the work; and to adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) appropriating an additional $171,000 towards the project. The project is being funded by the Community Zone of the Park Improvement Fund. BACKGROUND On December 6, 2000, the City Council approved the appropriation of $120,000 for design of the building and utilities (water, sewer, and electrical) and preliminary site work. This appropriation did not include construction costs. The December 6, 2000, Agenda Report stated that staff would return to the Council to request an appropriation for construction at the conclusion of the bid process. At that time, the initial cost estimate for the project was $460,000. As previously reported, a percentage of the $460,000 may be attributable to other future projects, specifically the aquatics facility and AVCP Phase II. As a result, when budgets for those projects are developed, proportionate charges for the construction of the utility services and connection charges will be 0 A; MAMLindley\PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction ccagd.doc AVCP Restroom Contract Award Page 2 transferred, thereby lowering the overall cost of the restroom facility. Due to delays experienced in the design of the restroom building, the project was split in two: utility extension and building. On February 6, 2002, the City Council awarded a contract to J & H Engineering General Contractors, Inc. for the extension of the water, sewer, and electrical utility services to the AVCP Phase II restroom facility and appropriated an additional $169,000 towards the project. This appropriation, combined with the initial project budget of $120,000 for design services, brought the total project budget to $289,000, where it stands to date. Construction of the utility extension phase of the project is close to completion. The City conducted the bid process on the construction of the restroom building, which concluded on April 25. The apparent successful low bidder is Tasco Construction, Inc. from Camarillo. DISCUSSION Project Plans and Specifications Brent Schneider Architects prepared the design and specifications for the restroom facility. The facility includes a 450 square foot restroom and a 285 square foot concession stand. Both of these components are similar in size and design to the existing restroom facility at the softball fields. Additionally, the facility includes a 965 square foot storage room to be shared by the youth sports organizations based at AVCP. The storage space is twice the size as the existing storage area. The Council is being asked to approve the aforementioned plans and specifications. A full set of plans and specifications for the project were provided to the City Council under separate cover. Contract Award The bid closing for the construction of the building was April 25. The City received 3 bids. The Council is being asked to award a contract to Tasco Construction, Inc., the lowest qualified bidder, at a cost of $263,538. The other M: \MLindley \PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction ccagd.doc (-� 4-,^+^ C r" lI � . ., v AVCP Restroom Contract Award Page 3 two bids received are as follows: SBS $345,157 and QCM Construction at $391,000. It has been determined that the apparent qualified to perform the work. Tasco C confirmed that their bid is valid and prepared to proceed with the construction of Corporation at low bidder is instruction has that they are the project. Project Budget Additionally, the Council is being asked to adopt the attached budget resolution appropriating funds for the construction of this phase of the project. As stated previously, to date the Council has appropriated $289,000. Of the amount appropriated to date, approximately $197,000 has allocated to various project tasks. To complete the project, an additional $171,000 is needed to bring the total project budget to $460,000. RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote) Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the restroom facility; award a contract to Tasco Construction, Inc., for $263,538; and adopt Resolution No. 2002 -_, appropriating an additional $171,000 to the project from the Park Improvement Fund - Community Zone. Attachments: (A) Resolution (B) Project Budget M: \MLindley \PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction " ccagd.doC AVCP Restroom Contract Award Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 2001/02 BUDGET BY TRANSFERRING $171,000 FROM THE COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENT ZONE RESERVE FUND (2100) TO THE RESTROOM /CONCESSION /STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT AT ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK (2100.7800.7018) WHEREAS, on June 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the budget for Fiscal Year 2001/02; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to said Council requesting a budget amendment by transferring $171,000 from the Community Park Improvement Fund Reserve balance for the design and construction of a restroom, concession, and storage facility at Arroyo Vista Community Park; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A" hereof describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment from the described approved. General Fund Reserve as in Exhibit ` %A" attached allocating $171,000 more particularly hereto is hereby SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this lst day of May, 2002. ATTEST: Patrick Hunter, Mayor Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk \ \mor pri sere \home folders \MLindley \PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction ccagd.doc AVCP Restroom Contract Award Page 5 Resolution No. 2002- EXHIBIT A Budget Revision A. Fund Allocation: Fund No. Fund Name Amount 2100.5500 Community Park Improvement Fund - $171,000 $171,000 $460,000 B. Budget Appropriation: BUDGET NUMBER BUDGETED REVISION NEW BUDGET 2100.7800.7018.9620 $289,000 $171,000 $460,000 Approved to Form: Cn•n.��c \ \mor pri sery \home_folders \MLindley \PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction ccagd.doc AVCP Restroom Contract Award Page 6 ATTACHMENT B AVCP RESTROOM /STORAGE /CONCESSION FACILITY PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AVCP RESTROOM /STORAGE /CONCESSION FACILITY PROJECT BUDGET EST. Building Design $ 10,000 Civil Design $ 27,000 Electrical Design $ 2,000 Soils & Geotech. Testing $ 4,000 Project Management $ 6,000 Construction (Utilities) $125,000 Construction (Building) $264,000 Permits & Fees $ 3,000 Inspection $ 10,000 7% Contingency $ 9,000 Total Estimate $460,000 M: \MLindley \PARKS \Park Projects \AVCP Restrooms \award RR buildling construction ccagd.doc (fin 'f' -� "3 C V V W'- �