HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2003 0618 CC REGResolution No. 2003 -2099
Ordinance No. 295
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 2003
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3. ROLL CALL:
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Presentation of Certificates to Miss Teen Moorpark
2003 and Miss Moorpark 2003.
B. City Manager's Monthly Report.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING.)
Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the
Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish
to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must
do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that
item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning
of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior
to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda.
Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing.
A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and
Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be
imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu
of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of
each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available
for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the city Clerk at
517 -6223.
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 2
6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2. 8, Items
to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be
identified at this time.)
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider Minor Modification 3 to Residential Planned
Development Permit (RPD) No. 98 -01 and Minor
Modification 3 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM)
No 5133, Located on the South Side of Los Angeles
Avenue West of Fremont Street, on the Application of
Shea Homes. Staff Recommendations: 1) Open the public
hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public
hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving
Minor Modification 3 to RPD 98 -01 and Minor
Modification 3 to VTTM 5133 subject to Conditions of
Approval. (Staff: Barry Hogan)
B. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the
Private Roads within Residential Planned Development
(RPD) 2002 -02 (USA Properties) to be Subject to the
Provisions of the California Vehicle Code. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -
(Staff: Ken Gilbert)
9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Resolution Adopting an Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for the City of Moorpark for the
Fiscal Year 2003/2004. (continued from May 28, 2003)
Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -
ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Cynthia Borchard)
B. Consider Replantinq Plan for High Street Pepper Trees.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the removal of the 6
Pepper trees on High Street with a hazard rating of 9,
and direct staff to develop a replanting plan for the
6 trees as well as a removal and replanting plan for
the 18 trees with a hazard rating of 8. (Staff: Mary
Lindley)
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 3
9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued)
C. Consider Approval of the Arroyo Simi Trail Study.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the subject Study and
forward a copy of same to Ventura County
Transportation Commission with a request that they
consider becoming the lead agency for the development
of funding sources and conceptual designs for one or
more projects required to implement the objectives
outlined in the Study. (Staff: Ken Gilbert)
D. Consider Traffic Signal Coordination on Tierra Rejada
Road. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the
report. (Staff: Ken Gilbert)
E. Consider Preliminary Design for the Corporation Yard
Project. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the
subject report, approve the preliminary design
concept, approve Construction Option `A' (masonry
construction with covered parking) and direct staff to
work with the architect to develop options for
reducing construction costs, with a report on such
findings to be provided to the City Council prior to
fifty percent (500) completion of the Phase 2
Conceptual Design. (Staff: Ken Gilbert)
F. Consider a Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee
Title by Eminent Domain Certain Real Property Owned by
Benjamin Duarte Located at 296 Charles Avenue. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Make the findings of public
necessity as described in the agenda report; and 2)
Adopt Resolution 2003- , including the adoption of
the Negative Declaration for the Project as prepared.
4/5"s ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Hugh Riley)
G. Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee
for Specific Plan No. 2 (Pardee). Staff
Recommendation: Appoint a City Council Ad Hoc
Committee. (Staff: Steven Kueny)
H. Consider Resolution Adopting Revised Rules of
Procedure for Council Meetings and Related Functions
and Activities and Rescinding Resolution No. 2002-
2016. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No.
2003- (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt)
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 4
9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION
(continued)
I. Consider the Adoption of 'a City Policy for the
Application of Photovoltaic Systems on New
Construction and Existing Facilities within the City.
Staff Recommendations: 1) At this time determine that
requiring installation of photovoltaic systems on all
new residential construction is infeasible given the
costs of the current technologies; 2) Direct staff to
add to standard conditions a requirement for all new
residential construction to incorporate roof hardware
to enable photovoltaic systems to be installed in the
future without removal of roofing material; and 3)
Direct staff to bring to the Planning Commission for
recommendation to the City Council, proposed standards
for the placement and treatment of photovoltaic
systems in residential areas, as well as in commercial
and industrial developments, should property owners
wish to voluntarily install photovoltaic systems.
(Staff: Barry Hogan)
10. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meeting
of March 12, 2003.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May
28, 2003.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meeting
of June 4, 2003.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year
2002 -2003 - June 18, 2003.
Manual Warrants 112723 - 112724 & $ 325.00
112985 - 112988 $ 45,124.43
Voided Warrant
Payroll Liability
Warrants
110948 & 111128 & $
111156 & 111346
112986
112980 - 112984 $
(265.00)
2,556.74
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 5
10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued)
Regular Warrants 112989 - 113093 & $ 25,423.70
113094 - 113129 $ 876,235.27
Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register.
C. Consider Resolution Establishing the Appropriation
Limitation for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 for the City of
Moorpark at $16,650.451. Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2003- (Staff: Cynthia Borchard)
D. Consider Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. Staff
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003- ROLL
CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Cynthia Borchard)
E. Consider Resolution Approving an Agreement by and
Between the City of Moorpark and Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency for the City's Purchase of Parcel
"C ", Parcel Map No. 5426 from the Redevelopment
Agency, for a Human Services Complex. Staff
Recommendation: 1) Approve Resolution No. 2003 -
approving the Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms and
amending the FY 2002/2003 budget to appropriate
$370,000 for this purpose; and 2) Direct the City
Manager, on behalf of the City, to execute Purchase
Agreement with Loan Terms, subject to final language
approval by the City Manager and City Attorney. ROLL
CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Nancy Burns)
F. Consider Moorpark Library Expenditures for Fiscal Year
2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Approve the library
material collection expenditure recommendation of the
Moorpark Library Advisory Committee for submittal to
the County of Ventura Board of Supervisors. (Staff:
Mary Lindley)
G. Consider Approval of Mission Statement, Priorities,
Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff
Recommendation: Approve Mission Statement,
Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year
2003/2004. (Staff: Steven Kueny)
11. ORDINANCES:
None.
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 6
12. CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to
Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government
Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c)
of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8)
Property: APN 512 -0- 093 -080, Moorpark, CA 93021
Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Benjamin
and Peter Duarte
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.
D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Employee Organization: Service Employees International
Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998
E. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Unrepresented employees: Accountant I, Administrative
Services Director, Assistant City Manager, Assistant
to City Manager /City Clerk, Budget and Finance
Manager, Community Development Director, Community
Services Director, Information Systems Manager,
Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Public Works
Director, Recreation Manager, and Senior Management
Analyst.
F. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City
Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City
Engineer, Chief of Police, Administrative Services
Director, Community Development Director, Community
Services Director, and Public Works Director.
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
June 18, 2003
Page 7
13. ADJOURNMENT:
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48
hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II).
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM_ S. A.
CTi V ('rF1400RP,ARX. C.ATJT OR-�TTA
0417 Cn'Sncil Nlectin^
of
ACp';'iN: C.6r%4-%ve4 ,.,&t+.
g1c. geA, inA +0
BY: %'► .rho- .�.a.�.
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Pla e
DATE: June 2, 2003 (CC Meeting of 6/18/03)
SUBJECT: Consider Minor Modification 3 to Residential Planned
Development Permit (RPD) No. 98 -01 and Minor
Modification 3 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM)
No. 5133, Located on the South side of Los Angeles
Avenue West of Fremont Street, on the Application of
Shea Homes (APN 506 -0- 020 -45, 51, 475 and 500)
BACKGROUND
Residential Planned Development (RPD) No. 98 -01 and Vesting
Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 5133, on the south side of Los
Angeles Avenue, west of Fremont Street, were originally approved
by the City Council on October 6, 1999, for seventy -nine (79)
two -story condominium dwelling units on three (3) condominium
lots within a 10.37 acre parcel. The project was designed for
small, individual condominium "lots" with detached single family
dwelling units, including private front and rear yards. A
Homeowner's Association maintained clubhouse, pool, and tot lot
were also included. The project is accessed from Los Angeles
Avenue via a public street that extends southerly to the
easterly extension of Majestic Court. The majority of the units
take access from private interior drives. An application for
Minor Modification No. 3 to RPD No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification
No. 3 to VTTM No. 5133 was submitted on February 5, 2003. Those
applications include proposed changes to street widths and
alignment, plot plan, fencing, entry monumentation and
architecture.
Two thirds of this project lies within the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) 100 year floodplain. As a result any
development in the 100 year floodplain must not increase the
S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \1998 -01 Shea \Minor Mod 3 \cc agenda report.MM3.doc 0
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 2
water level more than one foot above the 100 year water level.
FEMA is currently in the final stages of completion to revise
the Federal Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) which allow properties to
obtain flood insurance. This property could be negatively
affected, if FEMA identifies that more of the land is likely to
be flooded in a 100 year storm. What all this means is that
Shea Homes grading plan and ultimate development could be
negatively impacted. Any grading plan which the City approves
will have to conform to the FIRM maps in effect at the time of
grading permit issuance, as well as any building permit.
DISCUSSION
This modification comes to the Council as a joint effort of City
staff and the developer. The end result, if approved, will
create a "win /win" situation for the City and the developer.
The City will get a much better designed project, a traffic
signal and four way intersection on Los Angeles Avenue, a
housing product which will appear less dense, and substantial
additional on -site parking. The developer will get a product
which will be easier to sell and will have more value.
Proposed Project
The applicant has requested several modifications to the
approved project:
• Align the Northerly Entrance with Millard Street
• Allow 32 -foot and 26 -foot Wide Private Streets
• Relocate the Recreation Area
• Amend the Unit Design and Architecture to Allow Duplex
Style Units with 18 -foot Deep Driveways
• Relocate the Southern Tract Boundary South to the Arroyo
Cimi
• Allow a 46 -foot Wide Right -of -Way for Majestic Court
• Modify the Entry Monumentation and Fence /Wall Plan
Staff has studied the applicants proposed modifications and
offers the following comments:
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 3
Align the Northerly Entrance with Millard Street:
The original project was approved with its main access from Los
Angeles Avenue located adjacent to the western boundary of the
site. This location was chosen because it coincides with
several non - buildable easements, including one in favor of the
Ventura County for access to the Arroyo Simi. The applicant, in
conjunction with staff, determined that the community would be
better served if the main access from Los Angeles Avenue were
realigned eastward, as a southerly extension of Millard Street.
This would allow for signalization of the intersection with Los
Angeles Avenue, providing a safer and more efficient entry /exit
to this neighborhood and the neighborhood to the north. The
realignment of the entry could result in an overall loss of five
units. However, with other proposed design modifications the
resulting net loss would be two units. This issue is addressed
further in the Analysis section below.
Allow 32 -foot and 26 -foot Wide Private Streets:
In order to maintain the same lot sizes and to minimize the
reduction in number of units, the applicant has proposed
reducing the private streets to a width of thirty -two (32) feet.
Though not specifically requested in the application, one
private street is shown on the proposed site plan and tentative
map with a width of twenty -six (26) feet ( "C" Drive per
Attachment 4). This street provides access to units from only
one side of the street. Staff and the applicant have reviewed
the proposed widths with the Fire Department. The Fire
Department is satisfied with the street widths from a safety
perspective, provided that parking is restricted to one side of
the street for the 32 -foot wide streets, and no parking on both
sides for the 26 -foot street. The Fire Department has further
required that fire sprinklers be provided in every unit within
the tract. Each unit is also provided with a two -car garage,
meeting the criteria for enclosed parking for units in a multi-
family project. This proposed design also provides for 18 -foot
deep driveways, not part of the original design. The on- street
parking will be classified as guest parking as required by the
parking ordinance.
Relocate the Recreation Area:
Relocation of the project entrance results in a potential loss
of five (5) units for the project. In order to reduce the
number of units lost, the applicant has proposed to eliminate
DFRIAr%)
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 4
the recreation area from this project and build a larger
recreation area offsite, on a proposed project to the east.
This proposal would regain three (3) of the units lost as a
result of the entry realignment. Applications for the proposed
project to the east (TTM No. 5425, RPD No. 2003 -02) were filed
on March 14, 2003, but have been determined incomplete. Those
applications propose the same housing type at the same density
as the subject project. If the proposed project is approved,
the developer would market both projects as one development.
Staff has concerns with the relocation of the recreation area
prior to approval of the other project. Staff's concerns are
further addressed in the Analysis section below.
Amend the Unit Design and Architecture to Allow Duplex Style
Units with 18 -foot Deep Driveways:
The approved site plan for this project includes individual
detached units with minimal front setbacks. The front setbacks
do not currently allow for driveway parking. A "duplex" product
has been proposed that will provide the same square footage
within the homes and provide a useable eighteen -foot (181) long
driveway. Although the site plan currently indicates a few front
setbacks of slightly less than eighteen feet (18'), a condition
has been added that requires a minimum eighteen -foot (18') front
yard setback. The proposed units are designed to look similar
to a large single family home from the street. By providing a
variety of floor plans and elevations, the appearance of "back -
to- back" duplex units is avoided. Each unit is proposed with a
small front yard to be maintained by the homeowners association.
Five -foot (5') side yards and fifteen -foot (151) rear yards are
proposed. Although the site plan currently indicates a few side
yard setbacks of slightly less than five feet (5') and rear yard
setbacks of slightly less that fifteen feet (15'), a condition
has been added that requires minimum setbacks of five feet (5')
and fifteen feet (15') respectively.
Relocate the Southern Tract Boundary South to the Arroyo Simi
(Reduction of Required Dedication to Ventura County Watershed
Protection District):
This project is required to provide a dedication of land for
wetlands mitigation adjacent the Arroyo Simi. In order to
mitigate the loss of dwelling units, the applicant has proposed
to reduce the required dedication by shifting the developed area
of the tract southerly. This results in a slight reduction of
wetlands mitigation area and a slight increase of developable
0��,
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 5
area. This proposal has been accepted by the Ventura County
Watershed Protection District, provided all other conditions of
approval are still met.
Allow a 46 -foot Wide Riqht -of -Way for Majestic Court:
In addition to the above measures to maintain the same lot sizes
and to minimize the reduction in number of units, the applicant
has proposed reducing Majestic Court (a public street) to a
right -of -way width of forty -six feet (46') (36 feet curb to
curb). The existing right -of -way for Majestic Court, west of
this property is fifty -three feet (531) (40 feet curb to curb) .
Staff and the applicant have reviewed the proposed width of
Majestic Court, along with the width of the interior streets,
with the Fire Department. The Fire Department is satisfied with
the 36 -foot curb -to -curb width from a safety perspective,
provided that parking is restricted to one side of the street.
Community Development Department staff does not support a curb
to curb width that is narrower than that existing on Majestic
Court. This issue is discussed further in the Analysis section
below.
Modify the Entry Monumentation and Fence /Wall Plan:
As a result of relocating the project entry and reworking the
"theme," modifications are proposed for the entry monumentation
and fence /wall plan. The proposed changes to the entry
monumentation are fairly minor, and include relocation to the
new project entrance and adding the project name "Canterbury
Lane ".
Although the prior noise study identified a need for a ten -foot
(101) high block wall along the Los Angeles Avenue frontage, a
more recent study by Impact Sciences has concluded that a seven -
foot (7') high wall would provide the necessary attenuation of
roadway noise, resulting in exterior noise levels of 64.7 CNEL
at the closest residential area, slightly lower than the minimum
code requirement of 65 CNEL. Staff supports a reduction in
height to no less than eight feet (8'), with the final design
and height to be approved by the Community Development Director
based on the ultimate pad elevations. A condition of approval
has also been added to assure sensitive siting of the dwelling
units adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue. Other perimeter walls
will be consistent with those previously approved.
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 6
In addition to the above specific modification requests, a
condition has been added that allows the City Manager to approve
an Early Grading Agreement for the project. Although Early
Grading Agreements are normally only permitted with projects, in
this case, the overall benefit of the project modifications
warrants consideration of an Early Grading Agreement.
nNAT.V C T C
Issues
Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the
following areas for City Council consideration:
• Signalization of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street
Intersection
• Reduction of Street Widths
• Relocation of Recreation Area
• Distribution of Enhanced Landscapin
Signalization of Los Angeles Avenue and Millard Street
Intersection:
As noted above, the applicant, in conjunction with staff, has
determined that the community would be better served if the main
access from Los Angeles Avenue were aligned with Millard Street.
This would allow for Signalization of this intersection, making
for a safer and more efficient entry /exit to this neighborhood
and the neighborhood to the north. The applicant will be
required, as a condition of approval, to provide for the full
signalization of this intersection. The overall public benefit
of providing a safe, signalized intersection on Los Angeles
Avenue mitigates certain concessions that the applicant is
requesting, subject to conditions of approval.
Reduction of Street Widths:
Planning and Fire Department staff has reviewed the request for
reduction of interior street widths and for reduction in the
width of Majestic Court resulting from the realignment of the
front entry. Narrower streets can be favorable because they
create a sense of intimacy within a neighborhood and traffic has
a tendency to go slower than on wider streets. In this case,
the narrow streets in effect become long driveways because they
f y t..W Is �9 11 y
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 7
do not end in a cul -de -sac or hammer -head type turn around, nor
do they connect to other streets. The Fire Department is
satisfied that if fire sprinklers are provided in all of the
units and parking is restricted to one side of the street,
except for the 26' foot wide private street, having no on- street
parking, that public safety issues will be met. Since these
private streets are of limited length it is not likely that
there will be much public traffic on these streets.
As mentioned above, Community Development Department staff does
not support a curb to curb width that is narrower than that
existing on Majestic Court. A forty foot (40') curb to curb
width will result in an additional four feet (4') of width that
can be accommodated in the tract. This may be accomplished by a
slight reduction of side and rear yard areas and shifting of
dwelling units through out the tract. In fact, it appears that
the necessary four feet (4') might be accommodated within the
portion of the tract that is south of Majestic Court, without
sacrificing any reduction in the minimum five foot (5') minimum
side yard. The 40 -foot curb to curb width exists west of this
tract to Moorpark Avenue. Majestic Court is to serve as the
only collector south of Los Angeles Avenue east of Moorpark
Avenue. It would serve the Archstone Apartments, this project,
as well as the adjacent proposed project. Narrowing the width
for this portion of the reach of Majestic Court, or for further
portions would impede smooth traffic flow and circulation and is
not appropriate.
Relocation of Recreation Area:
In order to minimize the number of units lost, and maintain the
same lot size, the applicant has proposed to relocate the
recreation area off -site, to the proposed adjacent project. The
proposed location is in the vicinity of the existing Coptic
Church site, currently under a contract of sale with Shea Homes.
Staff has evaluated this request and concluded that it would be
better handled as a future permit adjustment, approved by the
Community Development Director, since there is no guarantee on
what may ultimately be approved on the adjacent site. In order
to ensure that this project is not constructed without a
recreation area staff has added a condition which would require
the issue of the recreation area be resolved on or before the
issuance of a building permit for the 40th dwelling unit. A
condition of approval has been added that requires the
recreation area to be shown on the approved plans, in the
vicinity of lots 46, 47 and 48. Precise siting of the
a rN 0, ►-�
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 8
recreation area will be subject to approval of the Community
Development Director.
Findings:
The requested modifications are not extensive enough to be
considered a substantial or fundamental change in land use
relative to the Residential Planned Development Permit or
Tentative Tract Map, would not have a substantial adverse impact
on surrounding properties, and would not change any findings
contained in the mitigated negative declaration previously
approved for the permit.
Therefore, the findings of RPD No. 1998 -01, VTTM No. 5133 as
made in Resolution No. 99 -1666, and those findings made in Minor
Modification Nos. 1 and 2 are hereby reaffirmed.
All previous Conditions of Approval would remain in full force
and effect except as modified by this approval.
PROCESSING TIME LIMITS
Time limits have been established for the processing of
development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act
(Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the
Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and
the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines
(Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable
provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have
been established for action on this project:
Date Application Deemed Complete: May 29, 2003
City Council Action Deadline for VTTM: July 17, 2003
City Council Action Deadline for RPD: July 31, 2003
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act a Mitigated
Negative Declaration was previously prepared for this
development project. This Modification is consistent with the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and no further environmental
documentation is necessary.
0C f ;08
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 9
STAFF RECODMENDATIONS
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close
the public hearing;
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Minor
Modification No. 3 to RPD No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification
No. 3 to Vesting Tentative Map No. 5133 subject to
Conditions of Approval.
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution No. 2003-
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
4. Vesting Tentative Tract Map
5. Elevations
6. Floor Plans
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR MODIFICATION
NO. 3 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 1998 -01 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 3 TO
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5133, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE, WEST OF FREMONT
STREET AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ARROYO SIMI,
ON THE APPLICATION OF SHEA HOMES, LLC. (ASSESSOR
PARCEL NOS. 506 -0- 020 -45, 51, 475 and 500)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on June 18, 2003,
the City Council considered Minor Modification No. 3 to
Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 1998 -01 and
Minor Modification No. 3 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM)
No. 5133, for modification to street widths and alignment, site
plan, fencing, entry monumentation, unit type, and architecture
on a site located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, west
of Fremont Street and on the north side of the Arroyo Simi
(Assessor Parcel Nos. 506 -0- 020 -45 and 51); and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 18, 2003, the City Council
conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, and closed
the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of
the information contained in the staff report and public
testimony has reached a decision on this matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find that Minor
Modification No. 3 to the Residential Planned Development No.
1998 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to the Vesting Tentative Map
No. 5133 as conditioned are consistent with the City's General
Plan.
SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act a Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been previously prepared and adopted for this
development project. This Modification is consistent with that
Mitigated Negative Declaration and no further environmental
documentation is necessary.
SECTION
Tentative Map
those findings
3.
No.
made
The findings of RPD No. 1998 -01, Vesting
5133 as made in Resolution No. 99 -1666, and
in Minor Modification Nos. 1 and 2 are hereby
CC ATTACHMENT 1
AON4,- �
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
reaffirmed and included by reference. The requested
modifications have been determined by the City Council not to be
extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental
change in land use relative to the Residential Planned
Development Permit or Tentative Tract Map, and therefore, would
not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties,
and would not change any findings contained in the environmental
document prepared for the previous approvals.
SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby
approves Minor Modification No. 3 to Residential Planned
Development Permit No. 1998 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to
Vesting Tentative Map No. 5133 subject to the following special
conditions of approval:
1. All conditions of Residential Planned Development
Permit No. 1998 -01 and Vesting Tentative Map No. 5133
and all subsequent modifications shall remain binding
and in full force, except as modified by the conditions
contained in this resolution.
2. Modification No. 3 to Residential Planned Development
Permit No. 1998 -01 and Modification No. 3 Vesting
Tentative Map No. 5133 are approved per the submitted
site plan and tentative map as modified by the
conditions contained in this resolution.
3. Parking is restricted to one side of the street for
%NA," %ND," "E," and F" Drives and Majestic Court
between the Westcott Court and the easterly project
boundary. "No Stopping" signs shall be installed at
the sole cost of the applicant to the satisfaction of
the Ventura County Fire Prevention District and the
City Engineer.
4. No parking is permitted on "C" Drive. "No Stopping"
signs shall be installed at the sole cost of the
applicant to the satisfaction of the Ventura County
Fire Prevention District and the City Engineer.
S. Prior to the issuance of a final building occupancy
permit for the first dwelling unit the applicant, at
their sole cost, shall design and install full
signalization at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue
and Millard Street to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. The signalization shall be installed and
completed within 180 days of the issuance of a grading
permit.
6. The recreation area shall be shown on the approved
plans, in the vicinity of lots 46, 47 and 48. Precise
01N 10
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 3
siting of the recreation area will be subject to
approval of the Community Development Director.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the 40th
dwelling the applicant shall provide proof to the
satisfaction of the community development director,
that a sufficient on- or off -site recreation area will
be provided as part of the completion of RPD No. 1998-
01. Approval of an off -site recreation area shall only
occur after approval of the General Plan Amendment,
Zone Change, Residential Planned Development and
Tentative Map for the adjacent property.
8. Any future improvements to the individual pads shall
follow the City's R -1 (single family zone) Development
Standards. Said standards shall be incorporated into
the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions for this project.
9. There shall be no development allowed in the front
yards of the individual pads. This includes, but is
not limited to, fences, lighting, pilasters and
fountains.
10. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to approve
an Early Grading Permit. Prior to issuance of an early
grading permit, the applicant shall provide bonding, in
an amount satisfactory to the City Engineer to
guarantee the restoration of the site to its pre - graded
condition. Grading and improvement for the ultimate
right -of -way of Los Angeles Avenue shall occur
concurrently with grading and improvement of the site,
and shall be completed within 180 days of the issuance
of a grading permit.
11. Building permits shall not be issued for any units on
this site until a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) has been issued by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
12. As part of the improvement plans the applicant shall
show standard curb and gutter with a public service
easement provided within the private drives.
13. The front setback for each unit shall not be less than
eighteen (18) feet.
14. The rear setback for each unit shall not be less than
fifteen (15) feet.
15. The side setback for each unit shall not be less than
five (5) feet.
16. There shall be no less than three (3) feet of clearance
between block walls and allowable interior protrusions.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 4
17. The sound wall adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue shall be
no less than eight feet (8') in height, with the final
design and height to be approved by the Community
Development Director, subject to ultimate pad
elevations.
18. The siting of the dwelling units adjacent to Los
Angeles Avenue shall be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
19. Majestic Court shall be designed with forty foot (40')
curb to curb width. The total right of way design
shall be subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director and the City Engineer.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Cierk
0 0 '(� 0'1 3
�N-"
HIGH ST.
O
O O a
a
�.4 (
NEW I LOS ANGELES AVE
0
W�
w
MAJESTIC
Ago _ ���� SITE
�'O
CC ATTACHMENT 2
Prepared by.
RJR ENGINEERING GROUP
Planning- Civil Engineering
Geotechnica l Engineering -Geology � 44
4243 Telegraph Road, Ventura, CA 93003
(805) 650 -5125 (805) 650 -5123 FAX
E -mail: r reng @earthlink.net
LEGEND f-QR I&I
�111 Q
Y
rzlm-
(-T�
MOOWAM
CC ATTACHMENT 3
SrrE PLA 3-3
VESTW-TSLAWTK,llETVt �TPMPPIO_51.
MSkVR t4OD89"TOON
i
�W I
5 II
/ I 1
li I�
I
I
i
•1
s 9i
� E
i
F7
1E
I
G _
3
a
n
t
pE r.a
I Gy
i 6 ij
i r
I
o
L !r�
rI
�o
- --a— --
s
e ri p rj i g �i I a
'it p�it Ilk
�p((a d
Ipef�
R
IF
r� pi!
IN,
' $ii r ! e'i � � rp i4✓!ea
2�l %�f
ysc�l3i�ielF�lRpp!19E��� �9��
��i i
f., lit
` ��p {
N� ffF
14NE;
Nh sal
i
¢ r e r
l�F�if
�! il i, i i!
f� l4 iii; !l�� NIA 0 OP
j
ii I
x�
i
�Y
H
z
U
H
H
a'
U
U
nn..� �'*..a
lPee �f i
?I
�
yill�
sfa�iltp i!�
Wj
5 N
Gi
�IF';1ioF
gia
{�f�"�•Gke ttr
4 "a � a
l�d::papir' €�i!
IF
r� pi!
IN,
' $ii r ! e'i � � rp i4✓!ea
2�l %�f
ysc�l3i�ielF�lRpp!19E��� �9��
��i i
f., lit
` ��p {
N� ffF
14NE;
Nh sal
i
¢ r e r
l�F�if
�! il i, i i!
f� l4 iii; !l�� NIA 0 OP
j
ii I
x�
i
�Y
H
z
U
H
H
a'
U
U
nn..� �'*..a
PLAN 2/3 A
PLAN 2/3 C
ELEVATIONS
CANTERB TJRY
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES
34SSD IW
VACCH ® ,
Lo
E
z
U
H
H
i
U
U
��o. i
L
LEFT (PLAN 2)
■Y ,TOM
RIGHT (PLAN 3)
,oil,, '"'go gum
imilloillis, nuu
ISM 0,
iii INN
imn N
lu
urm
auar log 11 lum
REAR
PLAN 3 PLAN 2
ELEVATION 2/3A
CANTERBURY aRWa.
MOORPARK , CA
-§-H-EA HOMES n'o cis
%,.oO -%./ ,
— ipl�pl{It ttw.itll
14 f¢gCl
10. 0� eme nlu
e alms '
i„ YILLIV WONCn1IM1'
•�LIIGl6
1. f0( sMLIIIG
I N�1T1Pd!
It y.[TYPIU �uJ.aPnVOt
PLAN 2/4 A
PLAN 2/4 B
ELEVATIONS
CANTERB URY
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES
sk'se. N
LICCH
UlO11A
iil
SUN=-
Eil
RIGHT (PLAN 4)
EL". ,� ;
ILM
LX= (PLAN 2)
MT
M LLjL
r-7-7
LJ FT]
EHR, m B 0
MLL nH
PLAN 4
PLAN 2
ELEVATION 2/4A
C k IST r r I E I P, I B TJ a - Y
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES �J Ono0o"Nno
-� G Aw
m
v
M
z
U
v
t�
z
Q
.a
a
z
0
d
a
W
C:
I
�) v
C
►� U
(� a
z°
V
W
0
x
x
.rr
I
I
au�u
RIGHT (PLAN 4)
Q'dP
LEFT (PLAN 3)
71
j
i
LED mm
EIRB
0 H m R p, rr",r",r-"l
REAR
PLAN 4 PLAN 3
ELEVATION 3/4B
CANTERB LTRY
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES
xj ow060
�s
U
It
Q
a
a
m
It
z
a
a
r�
e.�
z
0
W
w
U
mW-
(� a
h0
Z0
U
W
O
x�
W
x
1
P I I TOGV.
�m�rc
RT
ld
RIGHT
.rr
8 El ee ,
GSS
nil
n u n
ELEVATION 4C
CANTEaB URY �'
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES �r
�oause
0 C` �: �
►i ------ss= ---c- °sc =-- _---.� ---- y-------- ------------- ------ ------ya
7
U i^
M't- 0lDIlOOM DEOROOM 7 i n BATH MA!
` N.`a a °� "y ' rOlie
I 1 n rxu I
t 1 I
1i I -7 r-
r �
• �. __oar. ara..___i�
t 1
7 J HALL r ,
DEOROOtt ) 590ROOR ! j
1 1
I I
i ~- ~------- it
i
r-
SECOND FLOOR
' PORCH
I----- ------
r
I
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 2A PLAN 3A
1.607 SQ.FT. 1.792 SQ.FT.
CANTERBURY
MOORPARK , CA -_
SHEA HOMES
OR
E
z
U
a
E
a'
U
U
ont)(; W i
►� - - - -- -.Sir - iG�--- ut - - - - -- Wi' - - -- - ,.M1L- - -,OU. --------- - - -R.: r.--- - - - -T-
zi1 . 1
1 , 1•
1 szTM BEDROOM RIDROOn 2 ....u. n- BAT14 , ••••�'
0 .ei.y nARTER
t 4. BEDROOM
0 2 / I
' • - _ � - ........ - BEORmon 2
yy �• I I ?-A
MAY Z
TTT
BEDROOM 4
, - ^. OI►T. OPT i' . A'-11
I felt 2 Y
SECOND FLOOR
E7-�— N I GREAT R0011 ►AMILY i
ENTRY - - ✓ i i
f POR .. I KRwHEN EN4RT
I i ai I _ PORYCMI t I
Ii I PORCH
GARAGE
L
------ ----- ,o l..o= GARAGE
• � ae -. aol
i 1 ---
i -- - - - - - - - - - - - -I i
I I r
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 2A PLAN 4A
1,607 SQ.FT. 1,885 SQ.FT.
CANTERB URIf- �®
MOORPARK , CA _
SHEA HOMES
G, Cl I Wf;
------------------------- ------ --------------------- -
r -Z
10i
MAVER
----- awsw, M BATH M BATH
anoRoom
k
LAU .-u -BEDROOM 2
--- - --- L
WALL -------
— -U
HALL
7�-
DWROOM 4
E fs� 3/ 11
16EDWOM 2 0lDROOM 1
L---
SECOND FLOOR
WOW
COMING
Ka _14
o
00, GREAT ROOM
2, 1, ►AnLY
0 OLEQ.
H:
ILI
ENT 7� PORCH,
GARAGE
T 7-
"RAGE
---
- - - -- --
• - - - - - - - - - - -
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 3B PLAN 4B
1,792 SQ.Fr. 1.885 SQ.Fr.
3ASSDJAN
clk 1*--T 7 1E a B u a -Y L-ccm
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES
r r - -.;6-z7 - - -,,;;a ------------- -------
re
MASTER
M BATN
i � I I)
JtA.9
LOPT
IDED oom S/
OPTRL
Mp
---- IN
OPT. LOFT
Ar INWROOM 3
SECOND FLOOR
DUNG
kW FAMILY
'd Y ' 0.
ENTRY
I ------ �mcw
GARAGE
----------
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 4C
1,885 SQ.FT.
C A 1*4 rr IE a B U a -Y
MOORPARK , CA
SHEA HOMES
ITEM S • 8 -
CTTF OF NTOORT 88X, C.AT,TI^ORNTA
City CnTincil Veei nC*
of __ (Q- t 0 o3
ACTTON: A-yR=ved• Add ed
eso2oo3 - z� � al
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL R` ---- -� -
AGENDA REPORT
To: The Honorable City Council
From: Kenneth Gilbert, Director of Public Works
Date: June 6, 2003 (Council Meeting of 6- 18 -03)
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the Private
Roads within RPD 2002 -02 [USA Properties] to be Subject
to the Provisions of the California Vehicle Code
DISCUSSION
A. Code Section
Section 21107.7 [ herein ''Code Section''] of the California
Vehicle Code (CVC) provides for the enforcement of the CVC on
private roads not generally held open for public use, when
and if certain conditions and requirements are met.
B. RPD 2002 -02
There are private roads proposed to be constructed within RPD
2002 -02 [USA Properties] . Condition No. 43 of City Council
Resolution No. 2002 -1989, requires the developer of the
property to request that the City enforce the CVC on those
private roads.
C. Petition
Prior to taking action to make any private road subject to
the CVC, the Code Section requires that the property owner(s)
file a petition with the City requesting such enforcement.
The City is in receipt of such a petition. Said petition
complies with the requirements of the aforementioned
Condition of Approval.
CVC_USA D 1 0 1 ?, +•119
ll'fNi11lei*Aa
CVC Enforcement: RPD 2002 -02
June 6, 2003
Page 2
IM
Lis
F
Public Hearing / Hearing Notice
Pursuant to the requirements of the Code Section, this matter
is being considered at a public hearing. A Notice of this
hearing has been provided to the property owner, in
accordance with the requirements of the Code Section.
Resolution
The attached Resolution states that the private roads within
RPD 2002 -02, as generally described on the diagram made part
of the attached Resolution, shall be subject to the
requirements of the CVC.
Signs
The Code Section requires signs to be posted at the entrance
to each private road in order to enforce the CVC on such
roads.
Pursuant to the authority set forth in the Code Section, the
City may direct the property owner to place and maintain the
required signs. The attached Resolution stipulates such a
requirement. Said stipulation also identifies the future
Homeowners Association for the RPD as the responsible party
for the placement and maintenance of the required signs.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No 2003-
Attachments
Exhibit 1: Resolution
CVC USA 4 OrN ft'- .p 0
ire-5
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND
DECLARING CERTAIN PRIVATE ROADS WITHIN RPD
2002 -02 SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
WHEREAS, Section 21107.7 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC)
(herein the ''Code Section'') provides for the enforcement of the
CVC on private streets and roads not generally held open for
public use, upon compliance with certain conditions and
requirements as set forth in the Code Section; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 2002 -1989 [RPD 2002 -02]
provides, via Condition No. 43 on page 16 of said Resolution,
that the owner of the property subject to RPD 2002 -02 [herein the
''Property''] shall request that the CVC be enforced upon all of
the private roads within said Tract; and
WHEREAS the City has received a written request for such
enforcement from the owner of the Property,
WHEREAS, said written request satisfies that provision of the
Code Section requiring the owners of the Property to submittal a
Petition requesting the aforesaid enforcement of the CVC; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on this matter was convened
pursuant to the requirements of the Code Section; and
WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was provided to the
owner of the Property, in accordance with the requirements of the
Code Section.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the private roads within RPD 2002 -02, as
generally shown on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part
hereof, shall be subject to the provisions of the CVC.
SECTION 2. That the enforcement of the CVC on said private
roads shall become effective upon the placement and maintenance
of signs giving notice of such enforcement, said signs to placed
at the entrances to each private road.
SECTION 3. That pursuant to the authority set forth in the
Code Section, the owners of the Property, including the
Homeowners' Association representing the future owners of the
Property, shall be required to place and maintain the signs
required by Section 2 herein.
Resolution NO. 2003 -
Page 2
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed
in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Exhibit 'A': Diagram
D Inl �!? sf', n
✓;/V3Ib
m
CD
N
I
0
C)
N
I
O
.H
M
o�
(1) (13
rz w
4J
-i
�i
W
SfTE DATfIr
UNITS:
96 1 BR/ I BA UNITS
70 2BR/ I BA UNITS
24 2BR/2BA UNITS
190 UNITS TOTAL
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS:
RECREATION BUILDING: 4,055
MAINTENANCE BUILDING: 30C
DENSITY:
190 UNITS /6.75 ACRES - 28.1
PARKING:
MINIMUM:
STANDARD OPEN SPACE . 9'x 18'
STANDARD COVERED SPACE. I O'z 19'
HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE . 14'x 19'
PROVIDED:
STANDARD OPEN m 55 SPACES
( TANDARD COVERED 132 SPACES
HANDICAPPED = 6 SPACES
PARKING RATIO: 190/190 - 1.0 SPACES /UNIT
USA PROPERTIES
FUND, INC.
NORTH
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
MOORPARK SENIOR APTS
MOO"ARK, CA
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM q. A
of
AC -��
Re-t�,o
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Cindy Borchard, Administrative Services Director
DATE: June 10, 2003 (City Council Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Adopting an Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for the City of Moorpark for the
Fiscal Year 2003 -2004.
SUMMARY
On May 21, 2003 the City Manager presented to the City Council
his recommended Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for
the Fiscal Year 2003 -2004. The Council held a public meeting to
discuss the budget on May 28, 2003. State law requires adoption
of a budget prior to June 30, 2003.
DISCUSSION
On May 21, 2003 the City Manager presented his proposed
Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for the City of
Moorpark. During deliberation of the proposed budget, the City
Council directed staff to make several changes to the budget.
These include:
1. Additional funding for VCAAA Senior Grant in the amount of
$40,300 from the General Fund (1000) . The General Fund revenue
was increased by the amount of this grant;
2. Eliminated EMT stipend in the amount of $105 from Landscape
& Lighting District Fund (2300) . The balance had already been
eliminated in other accounts;
3. Additional funding for two (2) radar speed display signs in
the amount of $20,000 from Gas Tax Fund (2605);
6 C' "W '. "
Honorable City Council
June 10, 2003
Page 2
4. Transferred funding for pager in the amount of $100 from
Parking Enforcement to Crossing Guard in the Traffic Safety Fund
(2000) ;
5. Removed funding for the canine park in the amount of
$14,000 from the Park Improvement Fund (2112);
6. Additional funding in the amount of $15,000 for Bocce Ball
Shelter at Tierra Rejada Park from the General Fund (1000);
7. Removed funding for the vacant Associate Planner position
in the amount of $68,963 from the Community Development Fund
(2200) ;
8. Transferred funding for the Community Development Director,
Administrative Secretary, Code Enforcement Officer and related
code enforcement operating costs in the amount of $315,144 from
Community Development Fund (2200) to General Fund (1000).
Additionally, the City Manager intended to discuss and recommend
to Council that the Neighborhood Night Out Event in the Police
Department Budget not be continued and the $3,100 used instead
to purchase a portable generator for use at the Police Station.
The net effect of these changes within the General Fund is a
reduction of $330,144 leaving a projected surplus in FY 2003/04
of $58,444.
If the City Council concurs with the changes to the City
Manager's recommended budget as noted in this staff report,
staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution. New budget books have been prepared for your
information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote)
Adopt Resolution No. 2003-
Attachment: Resolution No. 2003-
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MOORPARK
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2003 the City Manager's Recommended
Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 was submitted to the City
Council for its review and consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided the opportunity for
public comment at a public meeting held May 28, 2003, and
conducted detailed review of expenditure proposals; and
WHEREAS, as the result of the reviews and analysis,
expenditure proposals and revenue projections have been modified
as needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Operating and Capital Improvements Budget
for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 (beginning July 1, 2003) for the City
of Moorpark containing operating and capital expenditures and
anticipated revenues as identified in Exhibit "A" to this
resolution attached hereto and incorporated herein, shall be
adopted as the City of Moorpark's Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to amend the
capital improvement budget for the 2003 -2004 fiscal year at the
conclusion of the 2002 -2003 fiscal year when a final accounting
of project costs during the 2002 -2003 year is complete and
continuing appropriations are determined as long as the total
project appropriation authorized by the City Council is not
exceeded.
en4 � �
�.� �
� ��,
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to approve
appropriation transfers within departments and within individual
funds as required to provide efficient and economical services,
as long as the total department appropriation and fund
appropriation authorized by the City Council is not exceeded.
SECTION 4. Except as otherwise provided in this
resolution, amendments to the appropriations in the Fiscal Year
2003 -2004 Operating and Capital Improvements Budget shall
require Council action by resolution.
SECTION 5. The City Manager is authorized to make such
emergency appropriations as may be necessary to address
emergency needs of the City, provided that the appropriation is
presented to the City Council at its next regular meeting for
ratification.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
GA1,�'ia^1
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 3
Exhibit A
Operating and Capital Improvements Budget
For the City of Moorpark
Fiscal Year 2003 -2004
Provided Separately
ITEM 01 • $
:
Lon
s�r-r- 4o o b±n -L vq
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 3, 2003 (CC Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Replanting Plan for High Street Pepper
Trees
SUMMARY
In 2000, the City hired an arborist to evaluate the mature
Pepper trees on High Street. The evaluation took into
consideration the following elements: target zone, failure
potential, and size. From these elements, the arborist
rates each tree assigning a hazard rating between 1, a tree
presenting no hazard conditions, and 10, a tree with
serious hazard conditions. The mature Pepper trees on High
Street were assigned hazard rating of between 7 and 9. Of
those rated, 6 of them had a rating of 9. The Council is
being asked to approved the removal of the trees found to
have a hazard rating of 9.
BACKGROUND
The California Pepper Tree (Schinus molle) is native to
South America, not California as the name seems to imply.
It is a fast growing tree, generally reaching a mature
height of approximately 40 feet with an equal crown and
root spread. Today, arborist recommend against the use of
Pepper trees as a street tree. They are known for invasive
surface roots and are generally planted away from streets,
sidewalks and curbs; however, this is not the case on High
Street.
The arborist noted that the trees have been thinned
excessively in an effort to keep the branch height low.
This was a practices initiated by the County many years
af1l�+f1"t
The Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 2
ago. As a result, the trees have extensive decay, which
results in limb and trunk failure. To mitigate the weakened
structure of the trees due to the decay, the City has to
continue the practice of excessively thinning the trees to
minimize the weight of the branches. In some cases the City
has hired a tree maintenance company to fill large hollowed
out decayed areas with a foam substance to slow the decay
process down.
Additionally, the trees are located within the right -of -way
along High Street. Approximately half of the dripline area
beneath each tree is covered with impervious paving. This
condition creates additional stress on the trees.
The only other option to removing trees that present
hazards to people and property is cabling. Cabling is
invasive and should only be performed when absolutely
necessary and because it requires an additional ongoing
expense. Once a tree is cabled, it should be inspected at
least annually, if not more often. The cables will need to
be tightened and adjusted as the tree grows. Trees in
similar condition and size as those on High Street require
extensive cabling, which significantly increases the cost
of tree maintenance. Additionally, the use of cables can be
unsightly and can make more susceptible to decay and
disease where the cable is attached to the tree. For these
reasons, the City has never cabled any of its trees, but
rather removed them when a tree presents a potential risk
that cannot be mitigated by more traditional tree pruning
methods.
DISCUSSION
Staff is requesting approval to immediately remove the six
trees that received a hazard rating of 9 in 2000. These
trees have been deemed to have a high failure potential.
Because they have an active target zone, a limb or scaffold
failure could injure someone walking on the sidewalk or
damage a car in the street or an adjacent building, it is
important that the hazard be mitigated as soon as possible.
This project is exempt under the emergency provision of the
California Environmental Quality Act. An exemption has been
filed.
M:\MLindley \Landscp Zones\High St Pepper Trees ccagd.doc
The Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 3
The intent is to replace the six trees in locations on High
Street, further back behind the sidewalk, where there is
more room for mature root system. The exact location of the
replacement trees has not been determined yet. The Director
of Community Service will coordinate the identification of
appropriate locations with the Assistant City Manager and
Community Development Director to ensure that future
revitalization plans for High Street do not conflict with
the replacement trees.
Within the next 12 to 24 months, the City should also
remove and replace the 18 Pepper trees that received hazard
ratings of 8. To mitigate the significant change that will
be created when 18 large trees are removed on High Street,
the Council may wish to consider removing the trees in two
phases: remove 9 in nine months and the remaining 9, nine
months later. Similar to the removal plan for the six trees
rated 9, the intent is to replant as many trees as is
feasible given the existing and future infrastructure and
building improvements along High Street.
The eventual removal of the all trees that are rated 9 and
8 would leave two large mature trees with ratings of 7 and
the smaller replacement trees that were planted in the last
6 to 10 years (most of these are on the north side of High
Street) . These trees have a medium failure potential and
with continued aggressive maintenance of these trees, they
could remain viable for five to ten years more.
An option the City Council may wish to consider is to
select one of the large mature Pepper trees with a hazard
rating 7 or 8 to that appears to have some potential for
long -term survival and take extraordinary maintenance
measures, such as enlarging its planter area and cabling.
Such a tree could serve as a historical landmark. However,
the Committee should note that even a Pepper tree growing
in hospitable surroundings might only be expected to live
sixty to two hundred years. The surroundings on High Street
are far from hospitable for a Pepper tree. Despite all of
the City's effort, it may not net any significant
additional years for any of the subject trees.
In addition to the removal of the 6 mature trees, staff
plans to remove and replace 2 relatively young trees on the
M:\MLindley\Landscp Zones\High St Pepper Trees ccagd.doc
The Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 4
north side of High Street that have poorly shaped trunks.
This action will prevent future conflicts with structures.
STAFF RECODMENDATION
Approve the removal of the 6 Pepper trees on High Street
with a hazard rating of 9, and direct staff to develop a
replanting plan for the 6 trees as well as a removal and
replanting plan for the 18 trees with a hazard rating of 8.
M:\MLindley \Landscp Zones\High St Pepper Trees ccagd.doc C) A"t" Al.
.. �e 'If A. e6.
1
C
L
u
r
DECEMBER 18. 2000
KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
HIGH STREET TREE STUDY
Moorpark, California
INTRODUCTION
This High Street Tree Study was prepared at the request of Ms. Mary Lindley of the City
of Moorpark. High Street is generally deemed the center of historic downtown
Moorpark. Robert W. Poindexter laid out the initial streets of the city at the turn of the
century, around 1900. He planted a number of California Pepper Trees along what is
now the High Street right -of -way. A sign located on the south side of the street
commemorates the event, as follows:
Moorpark California Pepper Trees
Planted 1900 by Robert Poindexter
Ventura County Landmark #72
Identification by Moorpark Historical Society
The now stately California Pepper Trees lining High Street are now approximately one
hundred years old. They have suffered in various ways from the ever - evolving
development of High Street over the years. It is truly amazing that they still exist today,
especially given the fact that the average life of a street tree surrounded by pavement
in the United States is only seven years. Even trees located in typical narrow parkway
planters only live to an average age of thirty -two years. Trees in more hospitable
surroundings might otherwise be expected to have a lifespan from sixty to two hundred
years.
Given the historic status of the trees, the City of Moorpark desires to promote their
health and maintain the trees for as long as public safety can be assured. Tree cabling
is one technique that can be used to increase the safety of and extend the life of a
historic specimen. The City has a policy against cabling trees given the complications
and costs that can arise. Therefore, it has been recognized that the trees will eventually
need to be removed and replaced.
This Tree Study documents the present condition of the trees and provides a relative
hazard analysis. Recommendations are provided to improve the current health and
safety of the trees. A phasing program for removal of the trees is also presented.
This report is intended to provide the City Council and concerned citizens with tools to
make informed decisions with respect to the High Street California Pepper Trees. The
report was prepared in accordance with standards of the International Society of
Arboriculture.
IHIGH STREET TREE STUDY
CITY OF MOORPARK W PAGE 1
F� F3. r
u
I
C
DECEMBER 18, 2000
SCOPE OF WORK
KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
The scope of work included a ground field observation of the cultural and physical
condition of twenty -six (26) mature California Pepper Trees on December 12th and
December 13th, 2000. Data was recorded with respect to tree characteristics, tree
health, site conditions, target, tree defects, hazard rating, and hazard abatement. A
photograph was taken of each tree to record its condition at the time. These
photographs are included in Appendix A.
Following the field observations, data with respect to the trees was collated and
' compared. Based upon this information, a short -term and long -term evaluation,
maintenance and removal program was developed for the subject trees. As stated in
the Introduction, this information is intended to provide the City Council and concerned
citizens with tools to make informed decisions with respect to the California Pepper
Trees.
I TREE CHARACTERISTICS
'
Each of the subject trees is Schinus molle, commonly known as California Pepper Tree.
Despite its name, the California Pepper Tree is native to South America. It was
introduced into California by Spanish settlers and can be found at many historic sites,
'
especially mission gardens.
The California Pepper tree is relatively fast growing, generally reaching a mature height
on the order of forty feet (40') with equal spread. The trunk of an old tree is
characteristically gnarled. The heavy knots and burls often sprout leaves or small
branches. The tree usually does not require irrigation once established.
The California Pepper Tree is known for greedy surface rooting. It should generally be
used away from sidewalks and curbs, as it will damage pavement. It is best used along
country roads with no curbs or in larger areas where shade is desired. It can be subject
to root rot diseases in infected soils, as well as a number of insects. The species is also
'
known to be subject to scaffold branch and trunk failure from decay.
Each of the subject trees has a single trunk. The tree number, general location, trunk
diameter, height, and canopy spread of each individual tree is provided in Table 1 in
'
the Tables section of this report.
The Tree Number is a sequential number assigned to each tree, to be used as a
'
reference number for the remainder of this report. The High Street Address and Site
comments document the general location of each tree. The trunk measurement is the
average diameter of the tree in inches, measured at the standard distance referred to
as "diameter breast height" or dbH. This measurement is taken at four and one -half feet
t
above ground level. The vertical height of the tree in feet is estimated. The canopy in
feet is the estimated average horizontal spread of the tree.
The canopy forms of the trees range from minor to major asymmetry. The trees create
'
a generally co- dominant canopy along the north and south sides of High Street. There
IHIGH STREET TREE STUDY
CITY OF MOORPARK i PAGE 2
0 n <4 lr ^. 4
i�
IDECEMBER 18, 2000 KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
TREE HEALTH
As previously stated, the subject trees have been thinned excessively and stubbed
' back an unknown number of times. These procedures were intended to keep branch
weight low, thus reducing the probability of structural branch failure due to excessive
weight. There is a negative side to these practices. As stated above, mature California
t Pepper Trees are subject to decay that results in scaffold or trunk failure. The decrease
in vigor resulting from the removal of so much foliage will likely result in less effective
wood compartmentalization. Less effective compartmentalization increases the
probability of scaffold branch failure due to extensive decay forming within the tree.
Most of the trees exhibit epicormic growth and some twig dieback. This type of growth
generally occurs when a tree is stressed by an adverse event. In the case of the
' subject trees, the topping and thinning induced the stress. Simply described, normally
dormant buds sprouted to replace foliage that was removed when the trees were
topped or stubbed back.
Most if not all of the trees suffer from Peppertree Psyllid (Calophya rubra). This pest
was accidentally introduced into California from South American around 1984 and is
known to feed only on California Pepper Trees. Control is not generally warranted.
' However, given the weakened condition and extremely high value of the subject trees,
the City may wish to treat all of the California Pepper Trees on High Street, including
the young trees. A qualified pest control applicator should be contacted to spray a
systemic insecticide this winter to reduce the psyllid population. Implants or injections
could also be used, but these techniques cause trunk damage and are therefore not
recommended.
SITE CONDITIONS
' As previously stated, each of the subject trees is located within the right -of -way along
High Street. Approximately half of the dripline area beneath each tree is covered with
impervious paving. The sidewalk and curbs were replaced around many of the trees,
allowing more space for the large buttress roots. However, it is apparent that root
' HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK 4 PAGE 3
are young California Pepper Trees planted in the right -of -way, as well. These trees
'
were not the subjects of this study.
All of the trees have been pruned multiple times. The crowns have been raised high
above High Street and the canopies have been excessively thinned. The scaffold
'
structures suggest that the trees may have been topped or stubbed back years ago.
Such pruning leads to poor branch attachment from re- growth, as well as stress to the
'
tree's health. Branch failures are known to occur following re -growth from such events.
Despite the shortcomings of the species discussed previously, each of the subject trees
has value as a historic tree, street tree and shade tree. The heritage, character and
'
ambiance of High Street are due in no small part to the existence of these trees.
TREE HEALTH
As previously stated, the subject trees have been thinned excessively and stubbed
' back an unknown number of times. These procedures were intended to keep branch
weight low, thus reducing the probability of structural branch failure due to excessive
weight. There is a negative side to these practices. As stated above, mature California
t Pepper Trees are subject to decay that results in scaffold or trunk failure. The decrease
in vigor resulting from the removal of so much foliage will likely result in less effective
wood compartmentalization. Less effective compartmentalization increases the
probability of scaffold branch failure due to extensive decay forming within the tree.
Most of the trees exhibit epicormic growth and some twig dieback. This type of growth
generally occurs when a tree is stressed by an adverse event. In the case of the
' subject trees, the topping and thinning induced the stress. Simply described, normally
dormant buds sprouted to replace foliage that was removed when the trees were
topped or stubbed back.
Most if not all of the trees suffer from Peppertree Psyllid (Calophya rubra). This pest
was accidentally introduced into California from South American around 1984 and is
known to feed only on California Pepper Trees. Control is not generally warranted.
' However, given the weakened condition and extremely high value of the subject trees,
the City may wish to treat all of the California Pepper Trees on High Street, including
the young trees. A qualified pest control applicator should be contacted to spray a
systemic insecticide this winter to reduce the psyllid population. Implants or injections
could also be used, but these techniques cause trunk damage and are therefore not
recommended.
SITE CONDITIONS
' As previously stated, each of the subject trees is located within the right -of -way along
High Street. Approximately half of the dripline area beneath each tree is covered with
impervious paving. The sidewalk and curbs were replaced around many of the trees,
allowing more space for the large buttress roots. However, it is apparent that root
' HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK 4 PAGE 3
i
i
f
C
f
J
nFCFMRFR 1R_ 2000
KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
pruning at the buttress occurred in the past. In general, soil volumes are rather low for
many of the trees.
A layer of organic mulch surrounds most of the trees. Care should be exercised to keep
the mulch off of each trunk. Significant plant material grows around Tree Numbers 24,
25 and 26 at the Metrolink Station. These materials should be eliminated within six
inches of the tree trunks. Otherwise, decay may start and proceed unnoticed. Any
irrigation that sprays onto the tree trunks should be redirected.
Tree Numbers 11 and 12 compete slightly with overhead lines. However, there does
not appear to be a significant conflict. Tree Numbers 15 and 18 are near streetlights.
Again, there does not appear to be significant conflicts.
TARGET
When discussing tree hazard evaluation, target is perhaps the most important factor.
Target refers to the people or property that could be injured or damaged by a tree
failure. By strict definition, if there is no target present, a tree is not classified to be a
hazard.
Due to the proximity of the subject trees to the businesses, curbside parking, traffic,
pedestrians, and landscape features, they are each considered to have the highest
target value, classified as "constant use ". It is not practical to consider removal or
restriction of these uses to reduce the hazard value, as the trees form a canopy over
High Street.
TREE DEFECTS
Each tree exhibits similar root crown, trunk, scaffold, and branch defects. As previously
noted, the root crowns show signs of past root pruning. The trunks have many wounds,
cavities and varying amounts of decay. Each of the trees shows the characteristic burls
and galls that are associated with over mature California Pepper Trees.
Of special concern is the fact that the canopies have been raised very high over the
years. All of the canopy weight is concentrated in the uppermost portion of the tree.
Weight concentration in this area can lead to overstressing of the scaffold branches,
resulting in failure. As discussed above, this defect has been managed by keeping the
foliage very thin, thus reducing the scaffold branch load. In my opinion, this technique is
reducing the vigor of the trees, causing them to become very stressed and subject to
additional decay.
HAZARD RATING
The following hazard rating system utilizes the methodology contained in A_
Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas, by Nelda P.
IHIGH STREET TREE STUDY
CITY OF MOORPARK 9 PAGE 4
7
IDECEMBER 18, 2000 KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
For each tree, the part most likely to fail was documented. Failure potential is a
qualitative determination of the likelihood of failure for the part of the tree that is most
likely to fail. For example, a branch may be the most likely part to fail and its likelihood
' of failure may range from low to severe. The rating scale for failure potential is as
follows:
0 1—low
' o 2 — medium
0 3 — high
' o 4 — severe
In the case of the High Street California Pepper Trees, branches and scaffolds appear
to be the parts with the highest probability of failure. The trunks appear relatively stable
at this time.
Size of Part
' The failure of a larger branch or other part of a tree is likely more significant than the
failure of a comparably smaller part, due to the weight involved. Thus the size of the
part most likely to fail is factored into the overall hazard rating. The rating scale for the
' size of the part is as follows:
o 1 — less than 6 inches
HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK 4 PAGE 5
Matheny and James R. Clark. This guide is an official publication of the International
'
Society of Arboriculture.
The system utilizes the sum of three factors to establish a relative hazard rating for a
tree: target rating, failure potential and size of part. The greater the magnitude of the
rating, the greater the hazard. The absolute value of the rating is not particularly
meaningful, but can be used to compare the hazard level of various trees and to
'
monitor changes in the hazard level of a specific tree over time.
The hazard assessment factors determined for each tree are provided in Table 2 in the
Tables section of this report. Each hazard - rating factor is discussed below:
'
Target Rating
As previously discussed, the target for each of the subject trees is considered a
constant use. The target rating scale is as follows:
o 1 — occasional use
'
o 2 — intermittent use
o 3 — frequent use
o 4 — constant use
'
Thus, each of the trees has a Target Rating value of 4. As discussed, it would not be
practical to restrict access to High Street. Therefore, it is unlikely that this factor can be
reduced.
Failure Potential
For each tree, the part most likely to fail was documented. Failure potential is a
qualitative determination of the likelihood of failure for the part of the tree that is most
likely to fail. For example, a branch may be the most likely part to fail and its likelihood
' of failure may range from low to severe. The rating scale for failure potential is as
follows:
0 1—low
' o 2 — medium
0 3 — high
' o 4 — severe
In the case of the High Street California Pepper Trees, branches and scaffolds appear
to be the parts with the highest probability of failure. The trunks appear relatively stable
at this time.
Size of Part
' The failure of a larger branch or other part of a tree is likely more significant than the
failure of a comparably smaller part, due to the weight involved. Thus the size of the
part most likely to fail is factored into the overall hazard rating. The rating scale for the
' size of the part is as follows:
o 1 — less than 6 inches
HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK 4 PAGE 5
t
I �
C
u
DECEMBER 18, 2000 KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
o 2 — 6 inches to 18 inches
o 3 — 18 inches to 30 inches
o 4 — greater than 30 inches
The size of the branch or scaffold most likely to fail on each of the subject trees
generally lies within the first two categories.
Hazard Rating
As stated above, the hazard rating for each tree is the sum of the Target Rating, Failure
Potential and Size of Part and Factors. If the failure potential of the branches increases
over time due to increased crowding of the multiple attachments or an increase in
decay, the relative hazard rating will also increase. Similarly, if the size of a branch
likely to fail increases, the relative hazard rating will also increase.
As shown in Table 2 in the Tables section of this report, the overall hazard ratings for
the twenty -six trees range from 7 to 9. As discussed above, the hazard rating of a
particular tree changes as the condition of the tree changes. The condition of the
California Pepper Trees must be monitored periodically to update the hazard rating and
to develop an appropriate response to any defects or adverse conditions observed.
' Given the condition and maturity of the subject trees, I recommend that they be re-
inspected every six months to monitor for changes in the health and vigor, as well as
any overt signs of decay.
' If the Hazard Rating of a particular tree reaches a level of 9 or greater and cannot be
mitigated to a level of less than 9, the tree should be considered for removal and
replacement. Despite the beauty, heritage and other intrinsic values of these trees, a
' standard of public safety must ultimately dictate whether each tree can remain or
whether it must be removed.
HAZARD ABATEMENT
' In addition to the specific recommendations provided in earlier sections of this report,
the hazard rating of the trees can be reduced through a number of actions, including
pruning /aerial inspection, cabling, pest control, and replacement. Each of these actions
is discussed below.
Pruning /Aerial Inspection
As discussed earlier in this report, mature California Pepper Trees are subject to decay
within the branches. Each of the subject specimens should receive an aerial canopy
inspection once per year by a qualified arborist. The arborist should look for overt
decay, as well as any changes in bark structure that would indicate internal decay.
Minor pruning should be performed at that time to remove any crossing branches and
to reduce multiple attachments.
I cannot recommend continuation of the current practice of thinning the foliage. In my
opinion, the vigor of the trees has been compromised and they are more subject to
HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK � PAGE 6
In
IDECEMBER 18, 2000
KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
' decay and therefore failure. No more than twenty -five percent (25 %) of the foliage
should be removed per year for weight reduction purposes. Efforts must be focused on
managing the density of the foliage and its weight distribution without removing most of
' it.
Some specific immediate pruning needs were identified, as follows:
Tree Number 4 — Remove lower limb pointing to the southeast.
' Tree Number 5 — Remove stub on north side.
All trees — Reduce multiple attachments to strongest new leader.
'Cablinci
Cabling should only be used when absolutely necessary. The procedure requires that a
' hole be drilled through the both the limb to be cabled and the limb where the cable is to
be attached. An eyebolt is inserted through each of the holes and secured at the back
of the limb with a washer and nut. The cable is then attached to the eyebolts and
' tightened as appropriate.
Cabling is invasive. The hole in the limb can provide a point of weakness and an entry
point for decay. Since the cable is an artificial item, it is subject to failure from metal
' fatigue or material defects. It must therefore be inspected and maintained on an annual
basis. Use should be limited to those cases where removal of a branch would be too
severe to the structure of the tree.
' Given the above issues, the City of Moorpark has adopted a no cabling policy. It is
recommended that this policy be reconsidered with respect to historic trees. The goal of
preservation with respect to a historic tree can be deemed to be quite different that the
' goal of more typical street tree maintenance.
Pest Control
' As discussed under the Tree Health section, a qualified pest control applicator should
be contacted to spray a systemic insecticide this winter to reduce the Peppertree Psyllid
population.
' Replacement
The following trees should be considered for the initial removal and replacement
' program: Tree Numbers 4, 9, 14, 15, 21, and 26. These trees have the highest relative
hazard value at 9.
The next set of trees to be considered for removal and replacement would be those
' shown to have a relative hazard rating of 8 on Table 2. If cabling is not adopted, these
trees should be phased out on a schedule that is acceptable to the City and concerned
citizens.
' The last trees to be removed and replaced would be those with a relative hazard level
of 7. The overall goal is to reduce hazards to no greater than a level of 6. This action
insures that the City has taken all reasonable measures to protect the public.
' HIGH STREET TREE STUDY CITY OF MOORPARK W PAGE 7
1
DECEMBER 98, 2000 KAY J. GREELEY, ISA
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
As previously stated, if the annual Hazard Rating of a tree is rated at a 9 or above and
cannot be mitigated to a level of less than 9, the tree should be considered for
immediate removal. In general, each of the subject trees will eventually need to be
removed unless cabling is added to the acceptable preservation techniques.
WARRANTY
The subject trees were generally reviewed for physical, biological, functional, and
aesthetic conditions. This examination was conducted in accordance with presently
accepted industry procedures, limited to a ground level, macro - visual observation only.
No extensive microbiological, soil /root excavation, upper crown examination, nor
internal tree investigation was conducted. Therefore the report reflects the overall visual
appearance of the trees on the date reviewed. No warranty is implied as to the potential
failure, health or demise of any part or the whole of any tree described in this report.
Clients are advised that should physical or biological concerns be evidenced for any
specimen within this report, prudent further investigation, detailed analysis or remedial
action may be required.
As living organisms, plants continually exhibit growth and response to environmental
changes that influence the development, health and vigor of the specimen. These
influences may not be externally visible and may be present or develop over various
time periods depending on the site conditions.
It is recommended that due to the general nature of plant development and continued
environmental and physical influences on vegetation at a specific site, regular
monitoring by a qualified arborist is scheduled.
This report represents the independent opinion of the preparer and was conducted per
the client's scope of request. The report is therefore limited to the information provided.
IHIGH STREET TREE STUDY
CITY OF MOORPARK 9 PAGE 8
r-
1
0
i_
U
TABLE 1
TREE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
G, 111 4111, ,{r r
High Street
Trunk
Height
Canopy
Tree #
Address
Site
Diameter (in.)
(ft.)
Spread (ft.)
1
361 -1/2
_
Vacant lot
38
40
40
2
349
Ron's Portable Welding
47 1
45
60
3
NW corner at Magnolia Street
26
40
35
4
5
273
2nd tree W of NW corner at Magnolia Street
House
36
41____L5_0
48
35
45
6
255
The Secret Garden I
38
50 i
70
7
233
Office building (blue and white)
25
35
40
8
213
The Gas Station
43
40
60
9
10
165
165
Carton Profession Building (E tree)
Carton Profession Building (W tree)
39 _ i
37
55
50
50
45
11
137
Mayflower Market
�38
50
45
12
1 192
Western -most tree at old station
49
50
I 65
13
192
Second tree from W at old station
40
50
50
14
1 192
Third tree from W at old station
41
50
45
15
192
Fourth tree from W at old station
34
45
48
16
17
192
192
Fifth tree from W at old station
!Sixth tree from W at old station
32
42
40
40
45
60
18
226
Tan building
i 58
45
1 65
19
226
Vacant lot, E of tan building
31
30
40
20
226
(Vacant lot, second tree E of tan building
29
30
35
21
I 226
Vacant lot, third tree E of tan building
j 29
1 30
35
22
226
Vacant lot, fourth tree E of tan building
! 25
i 30
1 30
23
I 226
!,Vacant lot, fifth tree E of tan building
36
I. 35
j 65
24
_
Western -most tree at Metrolink station
37
40
1 40
25
26
Second tree from W at Metrolink station
:.Third tree from W at Metrolink station
j 32
i 51
L L 35
1 45
j 40
30
G, 111 4111, ,{r r
L
n
TABLE 2
HAZARD ASSESSMENT
Most
_
I
I
Relative
Tag
Target
Rating Points
Likely
Failure
Failure Potential
Rating I Points
Size of Part
Rating Points;
Hazard
Rating
_#
1
Constant
4 1
Scaffold
Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
2
Constant
4
Scaffold I
Medium
2 16"
to 18"
2
8
3
Constant
4
Branch
Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
4
Constant
4
Branch I
High
3
6" to 18"
2
9
5
Constant
4
Branch
Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
6
Constant
4
Branch
Medium I
2
6" to 18"
2
8
7
Constant
4
Branch
Medium I
2
--- <6"
1
7
8
Constant
4
Scaffold
Medium
2—
6" to 18"
2
_8
9
Constant
4
Scaffold
High
3
6" to 18"
I 2 I
_9
10
Constant
4
Scaffold
Medium
6"
to 18"
I 2
8
11
Constant
4
Scaffold
! Medium
2
6" to to 18"
22
8
12
Constant
4
Branch
I Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
13
14
15
1 Constant
C� onstant
Constant
4
4
1 4
Branch
{ Branch
Scaffold
Medium
High
High
2
3
3
6" to 18"
6" to 18"
6" to 18"
2
2
I 2
i 8
9
9
16
Constant
4
Scaffold
j Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
17
Constant
4
Branch
Medium
2
6" to 18"
2
8
18
Constant
4
4
Branch
Medium
2
I, 6" to 18"
i
2
8
19
20
21
22
1 Constant;
; Constant
I Constant
i Constant
4
4
4
4
Scaffold
Branch
+_Branch
! Branch
1 Medium
! Medium
High
High
j 2
; 2
3
; 3
6" #0 18"
1 6" to 18"
16� "to 18"
<6 "r
! 2
! 2
i 2
1
8
8
9
-8
23
24
Constant
1 Constant
j 4
4
Scaffold
Branch
Medium
Medium
1 2
2
16" to 18"
6" to 18"
2
j 2
8
8
25
Constant
I 4
Branch
Medium
Z
< <6"
1
7
26
Constant
4
I Scaffold
High
3
6" to 18"
1 2
9
Tree Number
Tree Numbers 3 (right) and 4 (left)
Tree Number
Tree Number
h
Tree Number 6
Tree Numbers 9 (right) and 10 (left)
Tree Numbers 7 (right) and 8 (left)
Tree Number 11
-'
g.'
G�
Tree Number 12
Tree Number 15
Tree Numbers 13 (right) and 14 (left)
Tree Numbers 16 (right) and 17 (left)
Tree Number 18
Tree Numbers 21 (right) and 22 (second from right)
Tree Numbers 19 (right) and 20 (second from right)
Tree Numbers 23 (right) and 24 (left)
C.1
L�
4
" 'Ail
n �z
y
.1
}
nt +
x?
i
«a:
ITEM q • G
1A
le„ rr 7or4
s} CX 4j - orwar4J_ .QPy,_., VG'T
Gon��c�ert��oh o!� !mil!► -�5_.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: June 6, 2002 (Council Meeting 6- 18 -03)
SUBJECT: Approval of the Arroyo Simi Trail Study
DISCUSSION
A. Background
�
1. The City received a Federal Congestion Mitigation Air
Quality [CMAQ] grant for the preparation of the subject
study.
2. In March of 2001, the City Council approved the Supplemental
Agreement between the City and Caltrans, pertaining to the
administration of this grant. The amount of the grant is
$120,000, plus a local match of $30,000. '
3. In November of 2002, the City Council approved the selection
of RRM Design Group to prepare the subject study. The amount
of the fee for this work is $125,000.
B. Purpose
The purpose of the subject study [ "Study "] is:
1) to determine the feasibility of developing and implementing
a project [ "Project "] to establish all or any part of a
trail system along the Arroyo Simi through the City of
Moorpark and easterly to Madera Road [See Exhibit 1], to
connect to an existing arroyo trail system in the City of
Simi Valley; and, if feasible,
2) to provide an implementation plan setting forth the
requirements and /or constraints associated with the
development of such a Project.
0 L v xy c�
Trail—Study—final
Arroyo Simi Trail Study: Approval
June 6, 2003
Page 2
C. Scope of Services
The general scope of the requested consultant services is set
forth in Exhibit 2. To summarize, the work effort was
restricted to a feasibility study and implementation plan
defining and describing options and alternatives for the
possible development of a conceptual design for a future
Project.
D. Environmental Document
The scope of work includes preparation of an environmental
assessment of the areas investigated. However, since the
purpose of the Study was not to define a Project, but to
merely describe options for a possible future project, no
environmental document was required to be developed. That
effort would be undertaken when and if a Project is ever
defined, funded and designed.
E. Utilization of Levee Maintenance Roads
The preliminary alignment identified for the Trail Study is the
Arroyo Simi. The assumption was that the trail would utilize
the levee maintenance roads where the Arroyo channel is
improved or planned to be improved. Study tasks include a
discussion of both obstacles (bridges) and alternative routes
(streets and easements) to this scheme. Here too the Study is
meant to be a feasibility analysis - not an Alignment Study. A
more in -depth analysis of alignments and constraints would be
the topic of a future effort to develop a preliminary design
for a Project.
F. Studv Document / Executive Summar
The final draft Study was previously distributed to the City
Council. A copy of the Executive Summary is attached as
Exhibit 3.
G. Summary of Study Findings [By Section]
1. Introduction: This section discusses and describes:
• the purpose of the Study;
• the Study Area & Trail Segments;
• trail route
• trail route
- evaluate
- identify
Trail—Study—final
goals; and
objectives .
the study area;
alternatives;
�1 "",1? f"
r �✓ �s <1,..9
Arroyo Simi Trail Study: Approval
June 6, 2003
Page 3
- evaluate alternative routes; and
- identify the most feasible route.
2. Route Identification and Evaluation: This Section identifies
a number of Trail Route Options for each Trail Segment, and
then evaluates them. The chart on page 2 -4 of the Study
lists all of the Trail Options and the evaluation score for
each. The pages following page 2 -4 describe each Trail
Option in detail. This section contains the analytical
"meat" of the Study.
3. Trail Feasibility / Recommendations: This Section identifies
the most feasible Trail Route Options described in Section
2. The map on page 3 -3 of the Study shows those recommended
preferred routes. This section also discusses:
• Near -Term Trail Routes (page 3 -6);
• Long -Term Trail Routes (page 3 -9); and
• Next -Step Recommendations (page 3 -11).
The "Action Items" stated in the Executive Summary, and in
Sections I and J of this report, are re- stated here.
4. Preliminary Cost Estimates:
"Recommended" (Section 3) Trail
3, are set forth on pages 4 -5
estimated costs are summarized
5.
• Near -Term Improvements:
• Long -Term Improvements:
Cost estimates for each
Option identified in Section
and 4 -6 of the Study. Those
as follows:
$ 6.9 million
$ 11.6 million
$ 18.5 million
Trail Management Operation and Maintenance: This Section
discusses and describes:
• trail ownership;
• trail administration;
• funding options (a grant funding
Appendix 'B');
• liability;
matrix is included as
• operations and maintenance considerations;.
- need for an Operations and Maintenance Plan;
- division of costs and responsibilities between
participating agencies;
- use rule / regulations;
- monitoring and administration;
- security issues;
- emergency access plans; and
- maintenance / inspection tasks and frequencies;
• Trail Manager function;
• maintenance needs / frequency list; and
• maintenance costs: $81,000 per year (est.).
Trail—Study—final G C v Iff"G
Arroyo Simi Trail Study: Approval
June 6, 2003
Page 4
H. Biological Assessment
Attached as Appendix `A' of the Study, is a fairly extensive
Biological Assessment of the study corridor. The information
contained in this document lays the ground work for any future
more thorough Environmental Analysis which might be undertaken.
H. Consultant's Recommendations
The Consultant lists six (6) recommended actions on page 2 of
the Executive Summary, which are generally summarized as
follows:
1. Develop a Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP);
2. Update the Circulation Element and the Park & Recreation
Element of the General Plan;
3. Prepare Alignment Study and Environmental Document;
3a.Consider forming a Joint Powers Authority [JPA] with other
affected agencies;
4. Prepare a Public Participation Plan;
5. Cost Estimate / Phasing Plan;
6. Form an Enterprise Team (seek development of public /private
partnership for funding of construction and maintenance.
I. Staff Responses / Comments
The following are staff comments on, or responses to, the above
list of Consultant recommendations:
1. Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP): The Community Development
Department [CDD] plans to prepare a BTP in 2004.
2. Circulation Element and Park & Recreation Element: The CDD
also plans to update the Circulation Element in 2004. The
Parks and Recreation Element is a part of the Open Space and
Recreation Element [OSCAR] . The update of the OSCAR is also
planned as a future effort of the CDD.
3. Alignment Study and Environmental Document: It would appear
to be premature to consider undertaking efforts to further
define the Project [EIR, development of Alignment
Alternates] until funding sources are identified and
secured.
3a.Joint Powers Authority [JPA]: It may be premature to
consider formation of a JPA at this time. When and if
funding is identified and secured, a JPA may be deemed to be
feasible, or even necessary, in order to develop and
implement the Project.
4. Public Participation Plan:
Trail—Study—final
It may be premature to expend
Arroyo Simi Trail Study: Approval
June 6, 2003
Page 5
resources to develop grass -roots support for the Project at
this time. This may be an early task of the development of a
Conceptual Plan, to be undertaken when Project funding is
identified.
5. Cost Estimate / Phasing Plan: These efforts would be part
of the development of the conceptual design alternatives.
Such efforts could be undertaken once the Project is funded.
6. Enterprise Team: It does not appear to be a fruitful use of
staff time and resources to develop public /private
partnership for this Project at this time.
J. Summary and Conclusions
The Study shows that the Project can be done. The Study also
identifies and clarifies a number of issues which could or will
affect the successful development and implementation of the
Project. One obvious constraint is the securing of funds for
the design development and ultimate construction of the
Project. Another major issue is resolution of multi - agency,
multi - jurisdictional matters affecting the funding, use and
maintenance of the Project. For these reasons, it is the view
of staff that the City should ask the Ventura County
Transportation Commission [VCTC] to assume the lead role in
seeking Project funding and in coordinating the involvement of
the various agencies which would be affected by or would
benefit from the Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the subject Study and forward a copy of same to VCTC with
a request that they consider becoming the lead agency for the
development of funding sources and conceptual designs for one or
more projects required to implement the objectives outlined in
the Study.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 3:
Trail Study final
Map of Study Area
Scope of Services
Executive Summary
0 `✓ J V' .. Dlr
z I
_ L
o CAMPUS PARK DR
2 MOORP RK sixr veil
x
fx'� �� 3 /�� j SWIIUn IMD�LL
o Y I
- -
ONALD
EO_AAGAti '
-RONAi •• • " nt FRWY
+ --
v Fl V rcxs • J • -
•;�k� p,� >w" iS I M.IU,4 LEY
CAS r
o _, 3 °„ k° ' • • • } • • r ANGELES , x -F�-. - , l _O ttx[
I � � mare . • • NN�•r•� � j�'� - -
m. ANGELES •
Ike
go-
6 • rs
AV :v • GEES r __ -._.. •••• r I ••••••9j st y _s
NEW
� d
ANGELES � �iw u, ,� • �. v.� , a*� � w «.:�...��••
qI� k ro'y #'r••�• "mro ; •••••••••••••• //
✓ ��J� "lj
IGS
ti rnnwm 4 o2l RD ' s W m
si
M
f
vr e
• g p 3 I � I 2 3
,• � - • ,� 4 s � B a° a? C ° _ r:. � 3 � I ,��non x "'. it
,•g'1r -. _ -_t 1yt....x lF Myf_.+.� •�� << y '4 (n— -__. ___ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ __ _ _ •� Lst� °'vnr �.s•r3s e
R
•• • 'm�, • f..t a '� ,v rimy js
••h••NE•••• •• .b' a+ *.� - _� `°r r� y Tt�irRn b�
' r .mr ve ao t ' ! I* " n y...� m " -` c r,,n ' ., 9_•
-
n
n I
ARROYO SIMI TRAIL ` - - -- tr
STUDY AREA
IT
> I
m
F. o der moo.
e�
i
!fC>
l�
Exhibit 2
Trail Study: Scope of Services
Page 1
A. Objectives
The objective of the SERVICE is to develop a feasibility study
and implementation plan [ "Study /Plan "] for the possible future
construction of a "multi -user trail" (equestrian, pedestrian,
bicycle) along the Arroyo Simi, from the westerly Moorpark
City Limit, easterly through the City and the unincorporated
County area east of the City, to the westerly terminus of an
existing trail system along the Arroyo within the City of Simi
Valley.
The Study /Plan shall identify the problems and /or obstacles to
the construction of the extended trail system (right -of -way
needs, topography, environmentally sensitive areas, wetlands
preservation, engineering issues, access, future maintenance
responsibilities, security issues, construction funding,
maintenance requirements / cost / financing, etc.). The
Study /Plan would also provide possible solutions to the
problems identified, such as alternate alignments, etc.
B. Trail Segments
Route Segments: The Study /Plan shall address Segment A and
Segment B of the Trail separately. Segments A & B are
identified as follows:
• Segment A: That portion of the Trail to be located on a
maintenance levee road which is part of the improved
Arroyo Simi channel, extending from the Peach Hill Wash
confluence (near Hitch Road), easterly to the limits of
the existing channel improvements at the rail crossing
north of Science Drive.
• Segment(s) Bl: Those portions of the Trail to be located
along the "unimproved" portions of the Arroyo Simi,
upstream of the existing channel improvements which
currently terminate at the rail crossing north of Science
Drive.
• Segment(s) B2: Those portions of the
proposed to be situated within [Class 2
roadway (i.e. "Old" Los Angeles Avenue)
any roadway [Class 11.
• Segment(s) B3: Those portions of the
proposed to be located on private propE
connect Segments B1 & B2.
Trail—Study—final
Trail, if any,
or Class 3] any
or adjacent to
Trail, if any,
arty in order to
Exhibit 2
Trail Study: Scope of Services
Page 2
C. Scope of Services
The scope of SERVICES shall include those tasks and services
outlined in the Proposal (Exhibit `B') revised and amended to
address certain requirements noted as follows:
1. Segment A [Improved Channel] : The Study /Plan shall address
the following:
a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features
and attributes of the proposed Trail.
b. Constraints: Describe any obstacles (road crossings,
etc.) to implementation.
c. Feasibility: It is presumed that the placement of a Trail
along this segment is feasible. So state, or explain why
it is not.
d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps
necessary to implement a Trail along this Segment. This
description shall include or address:
> needed improvements;
> permit requirements;
> indemnity / insurance requirements;
> security issues;
> liability exposure; and
> any other component or prerequisite to the approval of
the use of the channel levee maintenance road and the
construction and maintenance of the Trail.
e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to
obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility.
f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an
estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs.
2. Segment Bl [Unimproved Arroyo]: The Study /Plan shall address
the following:
a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features
and attributes of this /these Segment(s)of the Trail.
Alternative routes may be described.
b. Constraints: Describe the obstacles and constraints to
implementing this (these) Segment(s). Such analysis shall
include, but not be limited to:
> environmentally sensitive areas;
> flood inundation;
> flood damage;
> security;
> liability; etc.
c. Feasibility: Render an opinion regarding the feasibility
of implementing this Segment of the Trail.
d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps
necessary to implement a Trail along this (these)
Segment(s). This description shall include or address:
> needed improvements;
> permit requirements from all regulatory agencies having
Trail—Study—final A �'
O,.i �O �Y Fu1.J1
Exhibit 2
Trail Study: Scope of Services
Page 3
jurisdiction;
> the scope and degree of the environmental review
process anticipated to be necessary, with estimated
costs;
> indemnity / insurance issues;
> security improvements and issues;
> any other component or prerequisite to the approval of
the placement of a Trail along the unimproved Arroyo.
e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to
obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility.
f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an
estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs.
3. Segment B2 & B3 [Roadways and Other Locations]: The
Study /Plan shall address the following:
a. Description: Describe the location, alignment, features
and attributes of the proposed Trail. Which portions of
any such Trail alignment are proposed to be a Class I
facility.
b. Constraints: Describe any obstacles (acquisition of
right -of -way, easement, etc.).
c. Feasibility: Render an opinion regarding the feasibility
of implementing this (these) Segment(s) of the Trail.
d. Implementation Requirements: List and describe the steps
necessary to implement a Trail along this (these)
Segment(s). This description shall include or address:
> needed improvements;
> permit requirements;
> right -of -way acquisition;
> indemnity / insurance requirements;
> security / liability;
> any other component or prerequisite to the
implementation of this (these) Segment(s).
e. Implementation Costs: Describe all costs required to
obtain necessary approvals and to construct the facility.
f. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Costs: Develop an
estimate of annual operation and maintenance costs.
4. Funding Options: The Final Report shall summarize various
funding methods, sources, etc.
5. Ownership / Operation: If a Trail east of the City is deemed
to be feasible, the Final Report shall discuss and recommend
which Agency or Agencies should assume the responsibility
for funding, design, entitlement procurement, ownership,
operation, and maintenance of the Trail.
6. Work Components and /or Requirements: The work components
and /or requirements shall include, but not be limited to,
the following:
a. Field Survey;
Trail_Study_final �rA�l0 011 r
lr .� 1�y "i C�
Exhibit 2
Trail Study: Scope of Services
Page 4
b. Environmental survey and assessment;
c. Affected Property ownership information (Assessor Role);
d. Listing of Regulatory Agencies having jurisdiction;
e. Development of Conceptual Alternatives;
f. Discussion of Project Benefits;
g. Identification of all constraints and obstacles;
h. Description {Implementation Plan} of all of the
processes, prerequisites and requirements related to the
development and implementation of the project, including
the steps necessary to seek all necessary clearances and
approvals.
i. Description of all "soft" (design, permitting,
entitlements, etc.) and "hard" (construction) costs
associated with project development (design /permitting)
and implementation (construction).
j. Description of anticipated annual maintenance cost. Said
cost shall include a contingency for repair and /or
reconstruction of any trail segment subject to flooding
and /or flood damage.
Note: Work components shall not include:
a. Property Appraisals
b. An approved Environmental Document
7. Resources: The CONSULTANT is
resources which may facilitate
costs for same. Said resources
to, the following:
a. Aerial photography recently
Ventura and available to the
executed Agreement.
advised of certain available
the work and /or reduce the
include, but are not limited
completed by the County of
City pursuant to a recently
b. Topographic Survey and Hydrology information in the final
stages of preparation by the Ventura County Flood Control
District.
c. Available GIS data.
8. Tasks: The tasks and sub -tasks required shall be as set
forth in the Proposal, except that said tasks shall be
modified to address the requirements set forth above.
9. Meetings: Meetings shall be limited to coordination meetings
with City staff, as required, and one presentation of the
final work product to the City Council. No Community
Meetings to seek input for project development will be
necessary.
Trail—Study—final
Exhibit 3
Trail Study: Executive Summary
Page 1
Executive Summary
The Arroyo Simi Trail Feasibility Study establishes the most feasible near and long -term route
of a multi -use pedestrian and bicycle trail along the Arroyo Simi corridor. The multi -use trail is
intended to promote alternative forms of transportation and provide new recreational
opportunities consistent with the goals set forth in the City of Moorpark's General Plan, City of
Simi Valley's Bicycle Master Plan, and Ventura County's Regional Trails and Pathways Master
Plan Report.
The trail corridor is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Moorpark, County
of Ventura and City of Simi Valley. Other agencies with jurisdiction in the project study area
include the Ventura County Watershed Protection District, Caltrans, and Southern California
Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA). The planning effort for this Feasibility Study has included key
stakeholder interviews, field investigation, jurisdictional agency coordination, environmental
surveys, and applicable planning document research and review. The resulting routes in the
Arroyo Simi Trail Feasibility Study largely reflect the input and advice provided through the
planning process.
The proposed trail traverses approximately 9 miles stretching between the westerly Moorpark
City Limit and extends easterly through the City of Moorpark and unincorporated Ventura
County, to the westerly terminus of the City of Simi Valley's existing trail system crossing both
privately and publicly owned property. The proposed trail route consists of a combination of
Class I and Class II facilities with connections to neighborhoods, schools, parks, downtown
Moorpark, employment centers and planned regional trail facilities.
On a regional scale, the Arroyo Simi Trail section is a vital trail corridor within the "Ultimate
Loop" of Southern California. The Ultimate Loop is a regional system of planned and
constructed trails that will ultimately connect several communities in both Ventura and Los
Angeles Counties to each other, major destinations, and neighboring regional trail networks.
An assortment of trail sections make up this Ultimate Loop including:
• Simi to the Sea Trail (Simi Valley through Moorpark to the Santa Monica Mountains)
• Saugus to the Sea Trail (Santa Clara River Corridor to the Santa Monica Mountains)
• Backbone Trial (Santa Monica Mountains to Point Mugu,
• Coastal Trail (Point Mugu to the Santa Clara River),
• Santa Paula Branch Line Trail (City of Ventura through the Santa Clara River Corridor),
• Santa Clara River Trail (Ventura County to the City of Santa Clarita).
Ultimately, connections to the Coastal Trail and Pacifica Crest Trail via the Arroyo Simi Trail's
link in the Ultimate Loop would provide Moorpark and Simi Valley residents the ability to reach
Mexico and Canada.
The Arroyo Simi Trail Feasibility Study provides support for an Arroyo Simi Trail concept and its
ability to be developed along a continuous route and constructed within a normal cost range.
The City Councils and other regulating authorities should utilize this foundation document to
prepare a definitive trail alignment study for adoption. Looking forward toward providing project
Trail—Study—final 0�n
�r��I
Exhibit 3
Trail Study: Executive Summary
Page 2
funding for the trails development and documentation of public support along with business
partnerships will be essential.
The development of an economic strategy utilizing an enterprise group for public, private and
government grants for the capital improvements should be given a priority. The development of
project phasing funding is a one to two year commitment for initial resources to become
available. The primary funding source will be through transportation funding opportunities.
Transportation funding is essentially provided for bicycle commuting purposes. All future
planning and documentation should make an emphasis on bicycle commuting rather than
recreational uses.
Recreational trail resources are fewer, lower in overall funding and more competitive than
transportation funds. Funding for master planning and preliminary environmental
documentation is rarely available through agency grants. Funding for the preliminary work will
need to be provided by the regulating agencies and joint venture options.
LOOKING FORWARD TO FUTURE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARROYO SIMI TRAIL, THE
FOLLOWING ACTIONS ARE RECOMMENDED:
1. City staff should consider preparing a recommendation to City Council to authorize
development of Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) to cover Class 1, 2 & 3 alternate
transportation bikeways and multi use trail opportunities. The BTP is the base
documentation requested and usually is required when applying for transportation funding.
The BTP could be done through an addendum to existing contracts to expedite funding
application opportunities in the fiscal 2003 -2004 period. Alternatively if time is not of the
essence a request for qualification (RFQ) and or a request for proposal (RFP) process
could be used.
2. City staff should consider preparing a recommendation to City Council to authorize
preparation of updates to Circulation and Park & Recreation Elements to the City General
Plan. This will provide consistency in the planning process and give an opportunity for
public participation. Timing for the General Plan update should be reviewed with the City
Planning Department staff. As mentioned in the above paragraph, this could be done
through an addendum to existing contracts in fiscal 2003 -2004 period or through the
request for qualification (RFQ) and or a request for proposal (RFP) process.
3. City staff should consider preparing a recommendation to City Council to authorize at a
minimum the starting of environmental impact report (EIR) to determine preferred
alternatives for Arroyo Simi Trail in Moorpark. This could be expanded if the other
regulating agencies on the proposed trail alignment were amenable to establishing a Joint
Powers Agreement (JPA). This would also be the opportunity to share funding costs for a
complete EIR. If the JPA is considered it should include financial planning for the operations
and maintenance conditions that will exist after construction.
Trail-Study-final
M
Exhibit 3
Trail Study: Executive Summary
Page 3
4. Prepare Public Participation Plan to include all,stakeholders of Arroyo Simi Trail. Establish
meeting dates and locations for public notice. This is to develop a consensus support group
with common interests, benefits and objectives. Through the public participation process a
concentration on the development of state legislative support will be instrumental in future
funding resources.
5. Concurrent with the development of the EIR, a project engineers cost estimate by phases
should be prepared and matched with funding sources for the Moorpark section of the
Arroyo Simi trail. City staff should consider requesting City Council to establish a budget line
item for matching funds for grant opportunities. A cash commitment and in kind services of
staff and consultants will make the project competitive.
6. Planning for the longer term the City or JPA should consider developing an Enterprise
Team. This group will identify and utilize a combination of revenue centers with the
emphasis of pubic /private, joint ventures, partnerships or concession agreements to provide
both for additional capital improvements and the operation and maintenance of the trail. The
early establishment of this group would allow it to also be involved in the grant development
program for phasing the Arroyo Simi Trail construction.
Trail—Study—final
ITEM 9 . -.D.
--- - - - - --
;::
Moorpark City Councilsa� ! tea,_ -
Agenda Report
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert Director of Public Works qd�_
DATE: June 6, 2003 (Council Meeting 6- 18 -03)
SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Coordination on Tierra Rejada Road
BACKGROUND
On May 21 the City Council considered a report pertaining to
options regarding installation of interim traffic signal
synchronization measures on Tierra Rejada Road between Spring Road
and the freeway. As discussed at that time, it is anticipated that
a full "hard- wired" interconnect system will be installed and made
operational for all of Tierra Rejada Road within one (1) year.
The option selected for interim measures was to install, at this
time, the traffic signal programming developed for the above
mentioned final project, and to rely on monthly monitoring of
clock synchronization until the interconnect system is installed.
DISCUSSION
The City Council asked that a report come to the City Council on
June 18, advising the City Council of the progress and /or
effectiveness of the above described interim measures.
As of the date of this report, staff was still working on the
implementation of these measures. It is anticipated that those
measures will be installed and operational prior to June 18. It is
the intent of staff to provide the City Council with an oral
report on the progress of that installation; and, hopefully, an
evaluation of the effectiveness of those measures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file this report.
T R Signals-0306
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
ITEM q • E -
of
n(ProVcc_•
P "7:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
June 6, 2003 (Council Meeting 6- 18 -03)
111�
SUBJECT: Preliminary Design for the Corporation Yard Project
DISCUSSION
A. Background
In December of 2002, the City Council approved the selection
of Martinez Architects to prepare the design for the City's
new maintenance facility. This project is to be constructed on
property located adjacent to the Caltrans Maintenance Yard, at
the east end of Fitch Avenue (see Exhibit 1).
B. Scope of Services
The scope of required architectural services is generally
described as follows:
Phase 1 - Facility Needs and Space Utilization Study: Conduct
research to determine current and potential future maintenance
functional requirements, and prepare a report setting forth
recommendations regarding:
• Preliminary site lay -out and design;
• Preliminary floor plan lay -out and design;
• Allocation of space and facility resources to operational
requirements;
• Total site (4.1 acres) utilization;
• Building area needs;
• Alternative building design, materials, etc.; and
• Construction cost estimates.
a XN [a {A"n
CorpYard_ prelim design t, � 4 060
Corporation Yard:
June 6, 2003
Page 2
Preliminary Design
Phase 2 - Conceptual Design: Prepare a final conceptual design
to include:
• Property survey;
• Topographical survey;
• Geotechnical investigation;
• Final Draft Grading and drainage plans (including
Stormwater BMPs);
• Draft utility plans;
• Final conceptual site plan;
• Final conceptual building floor plan;
• Final concept building elevations (with alternatives);
• Final conceptual landscaping and irrigation plans;
• Prepare environmental assessment [Note Environmental
Document to be prepared by others]; and
• Revise construction cost estimates.
Phase 3 - Final Design: Prepare the construction documents for
the project, addressing all of the project design elements
addressed in the Conceptual Design, to include:
• Final plans and specifications;
• Final construction cost estimate;
• Bid Documents; etc.
Phase 4 - Construction / Post - Construction: Provide
professional assistance with the following:
• Bidder Pre - qualification;
• Bidding Phase (design clarification / addenda);
• Construction (change Orders); and
• Post - construction (trouble shooting, problem resolution).
C. Maintenance Functions
The maintenance functions and facilities to be located at the
new Corporation Yard are generally defined and described in
the chart attached as Exhibit 2.
D. Preliminary Design Report
A copy of the subject Phase 1 Facility Needs & Space
Utilization Study has been provided to the City Council
separately. A copy of the draft Site Plan and draft Floor Plan
is attached as Exhibit 3.
CorpYard_ prelim design
Corporation Yard: Preliminary Design
June 6, 2003
Page 3
Certain elements of the subject study are summarized and
commented upon as follows:
1. Site Plan: The draft site plan is attached as a part of
Exhibit 2. Features of the draft site plan include:
• Site Utilization: The draft site plan calls for the
development of 2.16 acres [Parcel "A "] of the 4.19 acre
site, for the corporate yard facility.
• Expansion Area: The draft site plan shows an area of
about one acre (1 ac.) at the easterly end of the gross
property [Parcel "B "] to be held for possible needed
future expansion. Interim uses of this area could include
temporary storage and a construction staging area for
City construction contracts.
• Remnant Parcel: The draft site plan also shows a 0.58
acre parcel at the west end of the property [Parcel "C "],
intended to be subdivided and sold for development (light
industrial use) in order to defray some of the project
design and development costs.
• Rear Parcel Access: The site plan allows independent
access to Lot "B" at the east end.
• Material / Equipment / Vehicle Storage: Ample area has
been provided for the outside storage.
• Covered Parking Areas: Covered parking is provided along
the north facade of the building, as well as along the
north property line.
• Refuse Transfer: A facility has been provided to allow
easy dumping of debris into large trash bins, as well as
easy pick -up of those large trash bins.
• Refueling: Liquid Natural Gas and electric re- fueling
stations have been provided. Gasoline pumps have
purposefully been omitted.
• Animal Containment: An area has been provided for this
purpose.
• Parking: Ample area has been provided for guest and
employee parking.
• Circulation: The site plans provides for good circulation
in, through and out of the facility.
• Security: There are two security gates for the yard, plus
one additional gate for Parcel "B ".
2. Floor Plan: The draft site plan is also attached as a part
of Exhibit 2. Features of the draft floor plan include:
• Building Size - is 9,200 square feet.
• Main Entry - is to be used as the primary access from the
employee / guest parking area.
CorpYard— prelim design
0 AN ry �9
Corporation Yard: Preliminary Design
June 6, 2003
Page 4
• Security - is provided by locking the main entry door and
the gates during business hours. [As with the current
facility, there is no one assigned "office duty" at this
facility. A door bell or telephone "ring -in" system will
be provided to facilitate public access to City staff at
this facility.]
• Self -Help Public Counter - is provided as a waiting room
/ reception area.
• A Public Restroom - is provided.
• Office Space - has been provided for current personnel,
with an office pool area suitable for use by future
expansion, if needed.
• Men's Restroom / Shower / Locker Room - has been
provided.
• Women's Restroom / Shower Lockers - is shown on the plans
as a future area to be developed if needed. In the
interim this room would be used for storage and the
public restroom would serve as the women's restroom.
• Access to Vehicle Parking Area - is provided at several
locations, with easy access to staging /storage areas.
• Covered Vehicle Parking - is provided along the north
fagade of the building with locked storage units and easy
access to inside storage staging rooms.
• E'mployee Meeting / Break / Lunch Room - is provided.
• A Meeting Room - is provided for meetings, training, etc.
• Vector Control - has been provided office and lab space.
• No Auto Repair - facilities have been provided.
• Storage Rooms - have been provided.
• Emergency Supply Storage - has been provided.
3. Options: Construction Methods and Materials: The study
briefly comments on the following four construction options:
With Covered Without Covered
Building Material Parking ($) Parking ($)
Concrete Masonry Option A Option C
Pre -Fab Steel Building Option B Option D
The four Options are restated as follows:
• Concrete Masonry Construction vs. Steel Pre -Fab Building
• Covered Parking vs. Uncovered Parking
Recommendations:
• Building Material: It is recommended below that the
building be constructed of masonry block. The added cost
of masonry construction was considered by staff to be
justified due to:
- efficiency (energy conservation);
CorpYard_ prelim design
Corporation Yard: Preliminary Design
June 6, 2003
Page 5
- durability (building life - span);
- usability (workplace environment).
• Covered Parking: It is recommended below that the final
design provide for the covered parking areas shown on the
plans. The added cost of this feature is believed to be
off -set by the long -term savings of wear and tear on
vehicles and equipment.
4. Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates: A cost estimate for
each of the above four construction options is summarized as
follows:
With Covered Without Covered
Building Type Parking ($) Parking ($)
Concrete Masonry 3,836,420 3,406,663
Pre -Fab Steel Building 3,563,178 3,133,421
5. Other Considerations: The report
following:
• Inadequacy of present facilities;
• Inefficiency of present facility;
• Hidden Costs of present facility;
• Need for new, planned, efficient
E. Drainaae Matters
also comments on the
and
facility.
The architect will also address known potential flooding
problems in the area the site which may involve raising the
elevation of the site and /or constructing a block wall along
the north perimeter of the property.
F. Fiscal Impact
1. Design: Design costs (architectural fees and other costs)
are estimated to be approximately $210,000. This does not
include the cost of preparing the environmental document for
the project.
2. Construction: As noted above, the current estimated
construction cost for Option `A' is $3.84 million [see
Section E -8].
CorpYard_ prelim design A P" P "G
`,� v tir d
Corporation Yard
June 6, 2003
Page 6
Preliminary Design
3. Total Project Cost Estimate: The total estimated project
cost estimate, based on the above noted preliminary cost
estimates, is summarized as follows:
Description Amount ($)
Design 210,000
Environmental Document 25,000
Land Acquisition 920,792
Construction 3,840,000
Inspection 250,000
Total 5,245,792
Note: This amount does not include any revenues which might be
derived from the sale of Parcel "C ", the approximately
one -half acre lot at the west end of the site.
4. FY 2003104 Budget: The proposed FY 03/04
Budget for the
subject project
is summarized as
follows:
Estimated
FY 03/04
Total
Description
Prior Years ($)
Budget ($) Project ($)
Design
50,000
229,208
279,208
Land Acquisition
920,792
0
920,792
Construction
2,500,000
2,500,000
Inspection
200,000
200,000
Total 970,792
2,929,208
3,900,000
5. Funding Approach: The approach taken in funding the subject
project is summarized
as follows:
Percent
Endowment
Gas Tax
Component
Fund 2800
Fund 2605
Total
Design
70
30
100
Land Acquisition
70
30
100
Construction
85
15
100
Inspection
85
15
100
6. Funding Source Breakdown: A breakdown
of the
funding sources
for the subject
project, as set forth in
the proposed FY
03/04 Budget, is
summarized as follows:
FY 03/04
Total
Description
Prior Year ($)
Budget ($)
Project ($)
2800 - Endowment Fund
677,384
2,489,827
3,167,211
2605 - Gas Tax
293,408
439,381
732,789
Total 970,792
2,929,208
3,900,000
7. Budget Adjustment: Absent dramatic cost reductions, it will
be necessary to amend the budget before the project is
advertised for receipt of bids.
8. Cost Reduction Efforts: As noted below, it is the intent of
staff to work with the architect to develop options for
reducing construction costs.
CorpYard prelim design (F; n" �,..-�� -�
lYtiiI.Y 0
Corporation Yard: Preliminary Design
June 6, 2003
Page 7
F. City Council Design Approval
1. Upon receipt of City Council approval of the subject Phase
1 Report, the architect will be directed to proceed with
the development of the Conceptual Design (Phase 2),
consistent with the preliminary plans set forth in the
Phase 1.
2. Upon completion of the Conceptual Design, the City Council
will be asked to review and approve the final Conceptual
Design for the site plan, floor plan and building
elevations.
3. With City Council approval of the Phase 2 Concept Design,
the architect will be asked to proceed with the development
of the construction drawings [Phase 3 - Final Design].
4. Upon completion of the Final Design, the City Council will
be asked to approve the project plans and specifications
and authorize staff to advertise the project for receipt of
bids.
G. Environmental Document
At some point prior to the approval of the final plans, the
environmental document for the project will be prepared and
presented to the City Council for approval.
H. Schedule
It is anticipated that the Conceptual Design (Phase 2) and the
Final Design (Phase 3) will be completed in approximately
eight (8) months. During that period, staff will select the
Construction Management firm for the project and complete the
required Bidder Pre - Qualification process. Construction should
commence by July 2004.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Approve the preliminary design concept, approve Construction
Option `A' (masonry construction with covered parking) and direct
staff to work with the architect to develop options for reducing
construction costs, with a report on such findings to be provided
to the City Council prior to fifty percent (50 %) completion of
the Phase 2 Conceptual Design.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Map
Exhibit 2: List of Maintenance Functions
Exhibit 3: Site Plan and Floor Plan
CorpYard_ prelim design
nfA a
i1
e a
--4 o
N M
G
20
rJ 2 I Q
.N 50'
ci
ne
1 I d
0
Q 21
54 0 0l C 1.89BAc
Q of
d
I�
4
e� to^ I
o
ei I I
4I�
4 f
ao 0 I W
1Z U
K
Q
"b p
I
-" I JO--
SECOND
STREET Y
Ycc)¢ -�R --
R A 1 L CZil nor
400'
Traci 1266 -1 reversion to
acreage per 1949/547.
20
5.621 Ac
Lot /A't
1 71
Previous AP. No's. 512 - 171 -01
through 512- 171 -15,17
B3
16
CB�
D
"n 15 S
IL
x
•�
♦•
N
�m
r
L =7721' I
'� r �
r
o14 2 2 o f 21 n
4'
v
� vi
tit
M
N
ti •,�R=
I
�
Ii
PITCH
�, '•
y f
AO 00_
0 »m — I —3 a "009"'S
a �/ENUE A �`R iR�
R•
a er
p
M
°
' °O
g
1
I7
R
�
Q
w
r
12.so'
A
X4000
-
1
F+
i
0
g
lo.00'
Z
Ni IS
pQ
R
ov6
C
11V
,j4'p
Y F
x
FLINt4
_ml e4- 110772 °1776' 'tLAST AVENUE Rai
_ 677*2e16 "M (,01,00
1 its'
1 A'� .
\Vp1h L -777
♦•
R•J O'
L =7721' I
'� r �
r
o14 2 2 o f 21 n
4'
50'
I
1
O
10
: 20
1\
U
. ice' ryT
ss t•
A�
O 19 L M
4.,Wk a IL
512 0- 150- U5
CAL7(�
N
�s
C�
Exhibit 2
Maintenance Functions
The following is a list of the maintenance and operation
functions to be performed by City staff or contractors, which
shall be accommodated at the Yard.
A Public Works
1. Street Maintenance
• Minor asphalt repair
• Striping / stenciling
• Traffic and Regulatory signs
• Tree Limb lifting / Root Pruning
• Sidewalk Repair
• Roadside debris and weed removal
• Storm drain maintenance
2. Parking Enforcement
3. Crossing Guard Supervision
4. Stormwater Quality Administration & Enforcement [portion]
5. Fleet Maintenance (minor maintenance)
6. Graffiti abatement
7. Contract Services Administration:
• Street sweeping
• Traffic signal maintenance
• Annual storm drain maintenance
• Major vehicle maintenance and repair
B Community Services
1. Landscape Maintenance
• Parkway /median landscape maintenance
• Park maintenance
• Trees
2. Facilities maintenance
• Minor repair
• Janitorial
3. Vector Control
4. Animal Control
5. Contract Services Administration:
• Landscape / Irrigation Maintenance
• Tree trimming / maintenance / removal
• Facilities maintenance and repair
• Janitorial
• Transit Contract Administration
• Refuse Franchise Administration
CorpYard_ prelim design 41 t-)0
..�stl0
9 �s
S P�
1 � �
j''� YMGD
J 1 �
1 1 L:� Q- 4 Y -- H i ate. a° rnrAOMdw miss '.rwm" 1 i
1 LOT - -- +
PORr1oN'c• r- - - - - -- ------------- - - - - -�
AREA TO BE SOLO
OR LEASED
1 (NOT A PMT mrnvl w.0 LOT PORTION 'A•
1 1
OF THIS PROJECT ) LOT PORlN)N "8' e
s CORPORATE YARD nom xu i s
lxmAVARr 0.58 ACRE 2.16 ACRES i i uisrA FUTURE & ACCESSORY
anaPAgECf -� USE AR EA
i .K poor ♦� s, m 1.05 ACRES ;
LOT 15 i LOT 16
y, L On VJO I'MIJt '
YMAY
1 0 O l _ 4 an v ua roim
- . ...... o N1Y L.Mmi. AT.. N00 — 1
�► r
� — — — . 4 ma wow 1 �►
� s
3
I 1 I \ I
SITE AREA = 4.13 ACRES 4 0 & r
CORPORATE YARD =2.16 ACRES i i � "'
LOT 17 1 1 CALTRM'S YARD i AREA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION = 1.06 ACRES c S
PROPOSED LEASE AREA = 0.58 ACRE Y
INOR ST EET PUBLIC PARKING & DRIVE WAY = 0.33 ACRE
FULLY ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA = 9200 SF i
I I
�i
iy
YE
n SITE PLAN NORTH yj
T SC11- 1 - -40 -0 ® 1Z
mot/ "rasa,
GRAPHIC SCALE, V - 10'- IV "• a -m -as
c?
s CO
___________ e_____________________ _______________________________ ________ _______________o_____________�o
e o 0 o pr d
I I 1
I I
I
1 I
CO•ERED
WORK
EA
1 iMgNL N 1 �
AM
L J j: 1 1
I •
1 1
1 I 6O
1 _
� is rvniavwwn -- iti � c-
swoons ENE
mosomme
PAWM
_ 75111111111111111111 ENCLOSED AREA: 9,200 S.F.
COVERED WORK &PARKING AREA: 4920 S.F. a g
EMwlxce i li.
I. S
o
U
a�
n FLOOR PLAN NORTH
ue• • I•- o•
° _a, -m
0 S 10 IS 30 a
2
ITEM q, V.
E 1.2003
AFT_ rove-A
RGo 2- _oo3 - 2101
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manage
DATE: June 10, 2003 (City Council Meeting of 6/18/03)
SUBJECT: Consider a Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee
Title by Eminent Domain Certain Real property
Owned by Benjamin Duarte Located at 296 Charles
Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
City staff has been pursuing acquisition of property that
would be suitable as a site for the development of a small
park (the "Project ")in the downtown area and in the
vicinity of Charles Street and Bard, Magnolia or Walnut
Streets.
Benjamin Duarte is the owner of 296 Charles Street, a lot
located at the southwest corner of Charles Street and
Magnolia Avenue (APN 512 -0- 093 -080) . The lot is currently
vacant except for an abandoned residential garage that is
in poor condition and is a neighborhood eyesore. This 5,000
square foot parcel is suited for the development of a small
park.
The City had an appraisal made of the property by John
McNamara & Associates. The appraised value of the property
was determined to be fifty -five thousand dollars ($55,000).
On April 24, 2003, the City sent a written offer to
purchase the property for the appraised market value of
$55,000. On May 6, 2003 the City received a letter from Mr.
Duarte stating that he had no desire to sell the property.
The City Council is asked to consider proceeding with fee
title acquisition of the property by eminent domain and to
City Council Agenda Report
June 18, 2003
Page 2
adopt a Resolution of Necessity to acquire the property
pursuant to Section 19, Article 1 of the California
Constitution, Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure and Section 40501(b) of
the Government Code.
An Initial Study of the project has been made in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a
Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration was
published on May 19, 2003. The comment period for the
notice expired on June 9, 2003.
In considering the adoption of the proposed Resolution of
Necessity the City Council must make certain findings as to
the need for the project and that the public interest is
served through the City's acquisition of the property.
These findings are as follows:
1. That the public interest and necessity require
the construction of a park at this location ( "the
Project "). There is currently a lack of park
facilities in this neighborhood of the City's
downtown area.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the Open
Space, Conservation and Recreation Element of
Moorpark General Plan which calls for the
development of mini parks in the downtown area.
3. That the above described Project is planned and
located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the
least private injury. This property is suited to
address the current lack of park facilities in
this neighborhood and the property being acquired
is vacant;
4. That the above described real property is
necessary for the proposed project. The property
is centrally located in the neighborhood;
5. That the offer to purchase the above described
property has been made to the owner of record of
the property, as required by California
Government Code Section 7267.2 and said offer has
City Council Agenda Report
June 18, 2003
Page 3
not been accepted by said
was sent on April 24, 200 3
sent a written rejection
2003.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
owner. An offer letter
and the property owner
of the offer on May 2,
Staff recommends that the City Council 1) make the findings
of public necessity as described in the staff report and 2)
Adopt Resolution 2003 - . Including the adoption of the
Negative Declaration for the Project as prepared. (4 /5th's
ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED)
Attachments: April 24, 2003 Offer to Purchase
Correction to 4/24/03 Offer to Purchase
Letter from Mr. Duarte
Notice of Hearing
Negative Declaration
Resolution No. 2003-
MOORPARK
1 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 517 -6200
April 25, 2003
Mr. Benjamin Duarte
3101 G. Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
Re: OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY:
296 Charles Street, Moorpark, CA - APN 512 -0- 093 -080
Dear Mr. Duarte:
With reference to our letter of April 23, 2003, the correct
address of the property is 296 Charles Street. We apologize for
any inconvenience this error may have caused. Please respond to
the April 23, 2003 offer to purchase the property by May 6,
2003.
Sincerely,
Hug R Riley
Assistant City Manager
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Joseph M. Montes, City Attorney
A� .Ca A l
��LS
0
PATRICK HUNTER KEITH F. MILLHOUSE CLINT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS JANICE S. PARVIN
Mavnr new.,.,. 0— T.— Cn inrilmamhar Cn inrilmomL e. i^ n�;b. en tie.
MOORPARK
' 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 517 -6200
April 24, 2003
Mr. Benjamin Duarte
3101 G. Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
Re: OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY:
296-H44j1a.Street, Moorpark, CA - APN 512 -0- 093 -080
C h.hrL""� ( \
Dear Mr. Duarte:
The City of Moorpark hereby offers to purchase your property
located at 296 High Street, Moorpark, CA, (APN 512 -0- 093 -080)
more particularly described on Exhibit "B attached hereto
( "Property ").
With regard to the Property, the City of Moorpark hereby offers
to purchase the fee simple interest in and to the Property for
the appraised market value of FIFTY -FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS,
($55,000.00).
An independent appraisal of value was made of the Property to be
acquired. The City of Moorpark has determined this amount to be
the fair market value of the property. The basis for that
determination is explained in the Appraisal Summary attached
hereto as Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein by this
reference. A Market Data Summary of comparable commercial sales
is also attached.
This offer is subject to:
1. City Council ratification
2. Your ability to convey acceptable marketable title,
including elimination of liens and encumbrances on the
Property.
A n'o ►-r
0
PATRICK HUNTER KEITH F. MILLHOUSE CLINT HARPER ROSEANN MIKOS JANICE S. PARVIN
Benjamin Duarte
April 24, 2003
Page 2
3. An environmental inspection and approval by the City.
The purpose of this process would be to attempt to
determine whether there is hazardous contamination
within, adjacent to, or coming from your property.
The environmental inspection and approval process may
include physical inspections and environmental
assessments as deemed necessary or advisable by the
City as well as other testing or inspection should a
preliminary review indicate it advisable. In the
event the City determines that corrective or remedial
action may be necessary, the City reserves the right
to reduce the amount offered to reflect these costs,
or to withdraw this offer. Any such inspections would
be conducted at City expense.
It is the City's hope that this price will be acceptable to you.
Please respond to the terms of this offer in writing no later
than May 9, 2003.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, the acquisition
or the Appraisal Summary, please contact me at 805 - 517 -6215.
Sincerely,
Hug R. Riley
Assistant City Manager
Attachments: Exhibits A and B
Market Data Summary
Valuation Analysis
CC: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Joseph M. Montes, City Attorney
A n'O '1t•
`✓ v x.Y�l)
Benjamin Duarte
April 24, 2003
Page 3
Exhibit "A"
Appraisal Sununary
PROPERTY APPRAISED Residential land at 296 Charles Street,
Moorpark, California.
OWNER OF RECORD Benjamin Duarte, et. al.
DATE OF VALUATION April 11, 2003
APPRAISAL PURPOSE To estimate the Market Value of the
subject property.
LAND AREA 5,000 square feet
IMPROVEMENTS Older residential garage, considered to
add no value to the land value.
ZONING R -1
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 512 - 093 -080
NUMBER
HIGHEST AND BEST USE Single- family residence
VALUE INDICATION $55,000
.� v v
Benjamin Duarte
April 24, 2003
Page 4
Exhibit "B"
Property Description
The northerly 100 feet of Lot 16, Block E, Townsite Moorpark,
County of Ventura, State of California, as per Map recorded in
Book 5, Page 5, of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of
Ventura County.
C�
�y
MARKET DATA SUMMARY
RESIDENTIAL LAND
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Sale
No.
Date of
Sale
Indicated
Sales Price
Zoning
Land Area
Sq. Ft.
Impv'ts.
Sq. Ft.
Land
$ / Sq. Ft.
Comments
1
3 -2 -00
$48,000
SP -RPD
7,500
0
$6.40
Located on Ist. Street
2
12 -21 -00
$40,500
SP -RPD
6,075
0
$6.75
Has upslope on back of lot
3
2 -27 -01
$85,000
R1
33,125
0
$2.56
Grantor purchased property
on 4 -14 -00 for $80,000
4
2 -13 -02
$100,000
RE -1 AC
90,605
0
$1.10
Hilltop property. Has view
$50,000 per property site.
5
6 -18 -02
$126,000
RPD -15
14,100
0
$8.94
Zoned 15 D. U. /acre. Could
develop up to 4 acres.
6
9 -11 -02
$56,000
RI -6
6,190
0
$9.05
Located on paper street.
MCNAMARA & AsSOCIATEs 25602 Alicia Parkway, Suite 409, Laguna Hills, California 92653 Tel. (949) 643 -3556 FAX (949) 643 -5019
MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES
VALUATION
The Market Data Approach produces an estimate of the value of a property by comparing
it with similar properties of the same type which have recently sold or are currently offered for
sale in the same or a competing area. The Comparative process utilized in determining the
degree of comparability between the two properties involves the appraiser's judgment as to their
similarity with respect to many value factors such as: time of sale; property location: type, age,
size, quality, utility, and condition of improvements: possible plottage: available land for future
expansion, etc.
For the subject property, the Market Data Approach will be used to estimate its value as
vacant land.
Market Data Approach - Land
The sales comparison method is the most common way of developing an estimate of the
Market Value of the land. In this approach, sales of vacant land, which, may be considered to be
comparable to the subject property are gathered and analyzed and adjustments made for various
factors in order to increase the comparability between the sales and the subject. The sales prices
are adjusted for factors such as: time of sale or market conditions and the changes in value
between the date of the sale and the date of valuation; location; utility of the property; access;
land size and shape; zoning; topography; etc. The adjusted prices are reduced to some common
unit of comparison such as price per acre, or price per square foot. The appraiser analyzes this
information and derives a unit value applicable to the subject property. When applied to the
appropriate unit measure, this value results in an estimate of the Market Value of the subject land
as if vacant and available for development to its Highest and Best Use.
A search for sales of vacant land with a utility comparable to the subject's was made of
the older sections of Moorpark. From this search a number of sales were investigated, of which
a total of six were selected for inclusion in this report. These sales, number 1 through 6, are
detailed in the Addenda on Supporting Data Pages, and are shown located, relative to the subject,
on the Sales Map, also in the Addenda.
These sales occurred between March 2000 and the date of valuation. All of the sales
were for vacant land, and four of the six are located in the Downtown Specific Plan Area, while
the other two are located just outside of this area, in older areas of town. These sales contained
land areas between 6,075 and 90,605 square feet. They reflected pro -rata land values in a range
between $1.10 and $9.05 per square foot for land.
Sale number 1 is the March 2000 sale of a property on First Street, east of Moorpark
Avenue two blocks southwesterly from the subject. The former improvements on this lot have
been cleared, and the sales price of $48,000 reflected a pro -rata value of $6.40 per square foot for
the 7,500 square foot lot. This property is zoned SP -RPD, 7 to 14 units per acre. The subject is
superior to this sale in location and market conditions, while the sale is superior in zoning, land
size, and utility. The two properties are about equal in most other factors. On a pro -rata basis,
this sale is considered to be superior to the subject.
(10)
MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES
Sale number 2 is the December 2000 sale of a parcel on Charles Street, across the street
from the subject. This is a vacant parcel with a land area of 6,075 square feet, and the
topography is level at the front of the parcel, with an upslope toward the back. This property is
zoned for up to 15 units per acre. The sales price of $40,500 reflected a pro -rata value of $6.67
per square foot for land. The subject is superior to this sale in corner location, topography, and
market conditions, while the sale is superior in land size, zoning, and utility. The two properties
are about equal in location, access, and most other factors. On a pro -rata basis, this sale is
considered to be superior to the subject.
Sale number 3 is the April 2000 sale of a vacant property on Charles Street, one block
east of the subject. This is a mostly level site that has an upslope on its westerly side. The land
area is 33,125 square feet, and the sales price of $85,000 reflected a pro -rata value of $2.56 per
square foot for land. The grantor had purchased this property on April 14, 2002, for $80,000.
This property is zoned R -1. The subject is much smaller than this sale, and is superior in market
conditions, zoning, and comer location. The two properties are about equal in location, access,
and most other factors. On a pro -rata basis, the subject is considered to be superior to this sale.
Sale number 4 is the February 2002 sale of two parcels located on Wicks Road, two
blocks northwest from the subject. The property is on a hillside above the old town area, and
there is a very good view from this property. The topography is a down slope from the street.
The total land area is 90,605 square feet, and the zoning, is RE -1 acre per dwelling. The sales
price of $100,000 reflected a pro -rata value of $1.10 per square foot or $50,000 per parcel or
building site. The subject is superior to this sale in market conditions, corner location, zoning,
access, and topography, while the sale is superior in land size, view, and utility. On a pro -rata
basis, the subject is considered to be superior to this sale.
Sale number 5 is the June 2002 sale of a parcel located on Charles Street, one block east,
of the subject. This is a double lot with an area of 14,100 square feet. It is zoned RPD -15 units
per acre. This zoning would allow up to 4 dwelling units on this property. The sales price of
$126,000 reflected a pro -rata value of $8.94 per square foot, or $31,500 per dwelling unit. The
topography is a down slope from the street. The subject is superior to this sale in market
conditions, corner location, and topography, while the sale is superior in land size, zoning, and
utility of the property. The two properties are about equal in location and most other factors. On
a pro -rata basis, this sale is considered to be superior to the subject, while on a per dwelling
basis, the subject is considered to be superior.
Sale number 6 is the September 2002 sale of a parcel located in an older neighborhood,
toward the easterly end of Moorpark, in the southeast quadrant of the Route 23 -118 Freeway.
This property is located on a paper street, near an improved street. This is a level parcel with
6,190 square feet, and the sales price of $56,000 reflected a pro -rata value of $9.05 per square
foot for land. The subject is superior to this sale in market conditions, location, corner location,
street improvements, access, and shape, while the sale is superior in land size. On an overall
basis, the subject is considered to be superior to this sale.
(11)
MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES
Each of these sales, in addition to other data, have been analyzed and compared with the
subject property, and adjustments made for a number of factors in order to increase the
comparability between the sales and the subject. Adjustments were made for such factors as:
market conditions, or the time of the sale and the trends in values between the date of sale and
the date of valuation; size and shape of the land; zoning; access; corner location; amount of street
frontage; adjoining and nearby developments; utility of the property; circumstances of the sale;
entitlements; location of the property; topography; offsite improvements needed for
development, etc.
After completing this study and analysis and making those adjustments considered
necessary in order to increase the comparability between the subject and the sales, the subject
land, considering it as if it were vacant and available for development to its highest and best use,
is estimated to have a market value of approximately $55,000. For the subject with its land area
of 5,000 square feet, the pro -rata land value is as shown below:
$55,00015,000 square feet = $11.00 per square foot
(12) 0n
MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES
FINAL OPINION OF VALUE
The one appraisal approach considered to be appropriate for use in this appraisal resulted
in the following indication of value:
Market Data Approach -Land Value $55,000
The land value is based on the assumption that the subject land is vacant and available for
development to its Highest and Best Use, and is based on sales of comparable and competing
land parcels, through the use of the Market Data or Comparable Sales Approach.
Use of the Cost and the Income Approaches was not considered to be appropriate for this
appraisal.
Based upon this study and analysis, it is our opinion that the Market Value of this
property, as of April 11, 2003, is in the amount of:
FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($55,000)
( 13) () 0 35
May 2, 2003
Mr. Hugh R. Riley
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark, California
Received
O � 20B
s,�t�'��Iana�ersOffic�
RE: OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY:
2% Charles Street, Moorpark, CA. (Corner of Magnolia and Charles Streets).
Mr. Riley,
Please remind the Moorpark City Council, that the previous offer received from your
office, on March e, 2003, for $125,000.00 was not accepted-
Please convey to Moorpark City officials, that their current offer on April 23, 2003, of
$55,000.00 is also not being accepted, for the reasons stated in previous letter sent to your
office dated March 7, 2003.
Si erely. .
'amin Duarte
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Joseph M. Montes, City Attorney
Benjamin Duarte, 3101 South "G' Street, Oxnard, California 93033
March 7, 2003
Mr. Hugh R. Riley MAR 10 2003
Assistant City Manager
City of Moorpark, California AAMAO- iaNedtke
RE: OFFER TO PURCHASE INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY:
296 Charles Street, Moorpark, CA. (Corner of Magnolia and Charles Streets).
We are not interested in selling this property. It is our desire to replace our former home
with another that will re- invigorate our relationship with the city and its residents. Our
family history has endured over a century in Moorpark, and we would like to continue
this tradition and culture.
It is our desire to begin plans immediately; we are currently in the process of securing an
architect and builder. We hope that we can work together in beatifying and rebuilding
our portion of Old Moorpark. We look forward to working with you and the City of
Moorpark.
Sincere ,
Benjamin Duarte
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager, Moorpark, California
`./ V r./ i
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF 296 CHARLES STREET;
APN 512 -0- 093 -080; AS THE SAME IS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED.
TO: Benjamin Duarte
3101 G Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010
et. seq., that the City of Moorpark intends to consider a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition
by eminent domain of the fee title to certain real property ( "Property "), for the development of a
public park (the "Project "). The Property is located at 296 Charles Street; APN 512 -0- 093 -080;
as the same is described in Exhibit "A" Attached.
The hearing will be held on June 18, 2003 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City of
Moorpark City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Moorpark City Council Chambers,
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021.
You, as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property, are hereby notified
that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered at that hearing. The
issues which will be considered are set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section
1240.030, and include:
Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST,
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or delivering that written request to the City of Moorpark, City Manager at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency of your intent and desire to be heard. Your failure to timely file a
written request to appear and be heard may result in a waiver of your right to be heard.
NOTICE OF HEARING, Page 2
For further information, contact Hugh Riley at (805) 517 -6215.
Hugh R. _ y
Assistant City Manager
Gn4-1� -0�
-
�NY N.J
NOTICE OF HEARING, Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY [296 Charles Street].
Name j� , Telephone
'T
Address-
Date
NOTICE OF HEARING, Page 4
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL
The northerly 100
County of Ventura,
Book 5, Page 5, of
Ventura County.
feet of Lot 16, Block
State of California,
Maps, in the Office of
E, Townsite Moorpark,
as per Map recorded in
the Gounty Recorder of
GIC�: 10 1-
PPK C4,,� NEGATIVE DECLARATION
. CITY OF MOORPARK
o, 799 MOORPARK AVENUE
Zo MOORPARK, CA 93021
9, 9grEO (805) 517 -6200
The following Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of
Moorpark.
Public Review Period: May 19, 2003 to June 9, 2003
Project Title /Case No.: Charles Street Mini -Park
Project Location: 296 Charles Street, Moorpark, Ventura County. (Location Map Attached)
Project Description: The acquisition of a 5,000 square -foot lot in the R -1 Single - Family Residential
Zone at 296 Charles Street for the development of a mini -park. Expected
facilities would include shade trees, turf, children's play equipment, benches,
and picnic tables.
Project Type: _ Private Project X Public Project
Project Applicant: City of Moorpark, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021
Finding: After preparing an Initial Study for the above - referenced project, it is found that
there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City of
Moorpark, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
(Initial Study Attached)
Responsible Agencies: None.
Trustee Agencies: None.
Attachments: Location Map
Initial Study
Contact Person: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager
Community Development Department
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California, 93021
(805) 517 -6281
nnt1 -q
11.10 v_ ti
Project Title: Charles Street Mini -Park
Charles St. Mini -Park
CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY
799 MOORPARK AVENUE
MOORPARK, CA 93021
(805) 517 -6200
Case No.: n/a
Contact Person and Phone No.: Hugh R. Riley (805) 517 -6215
Name of Applicant: City of Moorpark
Address and Phone No.: 799 Moorpark Ave, Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6215
Project Location: 296 Charles Street
General Plan Designation: Downtown Specific Plan Zoning: R -1 Single - Family Residential
Project Description: The acquisition of a 5,000 square -foot lot for the development of a mini -park.
Expected facilities would include shade trees, turf, children's play equipment, benches, and picnic tables.
A detached garage structure currently occupies the site and will be demolished.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
North: Single - Family Residences
South: Fire Station Site (under construction)
East: Senior Apartments
West: Single - Family Residences
Responsible and Trustee Agencies: None.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially
Si nificant Impact" or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated, "as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use /Planning
Mineral Resources Noise Population /Housing
Public Services Recreation Transportationfrraffic
Utilities /Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance x None
DETERMINATION: I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment,
and that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Prepared by: > -'Z eviewed by:
Date: _ j - Date: 5 3
G nlx 4- () 3
Charles St. Mini -Park
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Less Than
With Significant No
Mitigation Impact Impact
A. AESTHETICS — Would the project:
1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
2) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but
X
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
3) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
X
quality of the site and its surroundings?
4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Response: The proposed mini -park will not be lit for nighttime use. Low -level security lighting may be
installed.
Sources: Project description
Mitigation: None identified.
B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources
agency, to non - agricultural use?
2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X
Williamson Act contract?
3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X
due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use?
Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources.
Sources: Project description, location map.
Mitigation: None required.
C. AIR QUALITY — Would the project:
1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X
air quality plan?
2) Violate any air quality standard or contribute X
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
2 G .10
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any x
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant x
concentrations?
5) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number x
of people?
Response: The proposed mini -park will serve existing residences within walking distance and is not
expected to generate vehicle traffic, except for routine park maintenance.
Sources: Project description, Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element, Ventura County Air
Quality Assessment Guidelines of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District November
2000.
Mitigation: None required.
D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
x
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
r
2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
x
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
x
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
x
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
5) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
x
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy
or ordinance?
6) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
x
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation Ian?
Response: This project, in an urbanized location, does not affect natural biological resources.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
a historic resource as defined in §15064.5?
2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries?
Response: This project involves the grading and landscaping of the site for a park. The land has previously
been cleared and graded, leaving a remote possibility of cultural resources existing on site. A
detached garage structure on the site will be demolished, however, it has not been identified as a
historic resource and has known historical significance as it has unremarkable architecture and is
not known to be associated with any person or event significant to Moorpark's history.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
Involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X
most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? x
iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? x
2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or x
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B x
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
f')
Response: This project does not include the construction of any buildings. Soil erosion is not expected,
since the site will be landscaped.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project:
1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the x
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely X
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
7) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
8) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are mtermixea wren wuaianas r
Response: No known hazardous materials exist on the project site. Prior to demolition of the detached
garage structure, an investigation will be conducted to determine if the structure contains
asbestos or lead. Removal and disposal of such materials, if identified, will take place in
compliance with all local and State regulations.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project:
1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production
rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned
uses for which permits have been granted)?
3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of
a stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
4) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of
a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off -site?
5) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
6) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
7) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
9) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving i) flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
ii) inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Response: This project involves the installation of landscaping and hardscape for a mini -park. Proper
NPDES Best Management Practices will be employed during demolition and construction.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project:
1) Physically divide an established community?
2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
X
X
J A
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X
natural community conservation plan?
Response: The development of a mini -park in the downtown area is consistent with the Moorpark Parks
and Recreation Master Plan and the Open Space Conservation and Recreation Element.
The site is not specifically identified as a mini -park site in the Downtown Specific Plan,
however, a park is a permitted use in the R -1 Zone.
Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan, Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan, Zoning Ordinance,
Moorpark Parks and Recreation Master Plan, project description.
Miticlation: None required.
J. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
1) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
2) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Response: This project does not affect mineral resources.
Sources: Project description, site plans.
Mitigation: None required.
K. NOISE — Would the project result in:
1) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
2) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
4) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
7 �
X3.():3
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Response: Construction noise will be limited per the requirements of the Moorpark Municipal Code;
therefore, this impact will be less -than significant.
Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan, Moorpark Municipal Code.
Mitigation: None required.
L. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
1) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X
directly ( for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly ( for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
2) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
3) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Response: The mini -park will serve existing residents and will not lead to additional growth. The site is
currently unoccupied, containing only a detached garage.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
M. PUBLIC SERVICES
1) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
X
Response: A minor amount of additional park maintenance will be required with this facility.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
0
s
e
i
N. RECREATION
1) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
X
2) Does the project include recreational facilities or require X
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Response: This project will provide additional recreational opportunities.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project:
1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation X
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
2) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either X
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
4) substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
5) Result in inadequate emergency access? x
6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X
7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
Response: This project will serve the existing neighborhood within walking distance. Additional vehicle
traffic is expected to be limited to routine maintenance.
Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan, project description, site plans.
Mitigation: None required.
P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project:
1) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
X
Charles St. Mini -Park
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
2) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
5) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the projects projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
6) Be served by the landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
7) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Response: This project does not involve any land uses that would affect wastewater, or solid waste.
Water use would be minimal due to the limited size of the park.
Sources: Project description.
Mitigation: None required.
Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history of prehistory?
2) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effect of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and effects of probable future projects)?
3) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Response: This project involves the development of a mini -park to serve an existing neighborhood. The
area of work is fully urbanized.
Sources: Project description, site plans.
10 ate,
Charles St. Mini -Park
Earlier Environmental Documents Used in the Preparation of this Initial Study
None
Additional Project References Used to Prepare This Initial Study
One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and
are available for review in the Community Development Office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, CA 93021.
1. The City of Moorpark's General Plan, as amended.
2. The Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended.
3. Moorpark Downtown Specific Plan, October 1, 1998,
4. Moorpark Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
5. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Boring Study: 284 Charles Street, 661 Magnolia
Street, 297 High Street & 285 High Street, AGI Geotechnical, Inc., April 18, 2000.
6. Appraisal Report: 296 High Street, McNamara & Associates, April 11, 2003
7. The City of Moorpark Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 92 -872.
8. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. & California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Section
15000 et. seq.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
ACQUISITION FOR ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES
PURPOSES OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS
296 CHARLES STREET; APN 512 -0- 093 -080, AS THE
SAME IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBITS
"A" and "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED
HEREWITH
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark ( "City ") intends to acquire
the property located at 296 Charles Street; APN 512 -0- 093 -080
( "the Property ") in order to develop a neighborhood park; and
WHEREAS, the City made an offer to Benjamin Duarte ("Owner")
on April 24, 2003 to purchase property for $55,000; and
WHEREAS, said offer of $55,000 represents the full amount
determined to be just compensation for the property and
improvements; and
WHEREAS, said offer is not less than the City's approved
appraisal of the fair market value of the property; and
WHEREAS, the City has the authority to acquire the property
by eminent domain as provided in Government Code section
40501(b) and the required notice of hearing to consider this
resolution was given.
WHEREAS, the proposed use of the property for a public park
is consistent with the Open Space Conservation and Recreation
Element of the Moorpark General Plan and the Downtown Specific
Plan.
SECTION 1. The City of Moorpark (hereafter "City "), after
consideration of the staff report, staff presentation,
discussion, oral testimony and evidence presented at the June
18, 2003 meeting of the City Council hereby finds, determines
and declares as follows:
1. That the public interest and necessity require the
construction of a park at this location.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
2. That the above described Project is planned and
located in the manner that will be most compatible
with the greatest public good and the least private
injury;
3. That the above described real property is necessary
for the proposed project;
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the Open
Space, Conservation and Recreation Element of the
City's General Plan;
5. That the offer to purchase the above described
property has been made to the owner of record of the
property, as required by California Government Code
Section 7267.2.
6. All conditions and statutory requirements necessary to
exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire the
property described herein have been complied with by
the City.
SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
A. The City Council has received and considered the
information contained in the Negative Declaration prior to
acting on the proposed project and has found that this document
adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed
project.
B. Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources
Code of the State of California, beginning at Section 21000),
The City Council has determined that the Negative Declaration
prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act, reflects the
independent judgment of the of the City Council of the City of
Moorpark, and is hereby adopted as prepared.
SECTION 3. The real property that is the subject of this
resolution and is to be taken by the City of Moorpark is located
at 296 Charles Street (APN: 512 -0- 093 -080) and as described in
Exhibit `A' (Legal Description) which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein, and as more particularly depicted on
Exhibit `B' (Map of Parcel) which is also attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
'ter �!' ..►. J
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 3
SECTION 4. The public use for which the above - described
property is to be taken is the development of a park and the
City of Moorpark is authorized to acquire the above described
property by eminent domain pursuant to Section 19, Article 1 of
the California Constitution, Sections 1240.010 through 1240.050
of the California Code of Civil Procedure and other applicable
law.
SECTION S. If any of the above described property has been
previously appropriated to some public use, the public use for
which it is taken under this proceeding is a compatible public
use pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1240.510 or, in the
alternative, a more necessary public use pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure 1240.610.
SECTION 6. The City's Attorney and the firm of Burke,
Williams and Sorensen are hereby authorized and directed to
prepare, institute, and prosecute in the name of the City of
Moorpark such proceedings in the court having jurisdiction
thereof as may be necessary for the acquisition of the above
described property.
SECTION 7. This resolution shall be effective immediately
upon its adoption.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution, by a vote of not less than four - fifths (4/5) of
all of the members of the City Council, and shall cause a
certified resolution to be filed in the book of original
Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
IC��.��
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 4
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
G4 n ,q A "
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 5
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL
The northerly 100
County of Ventura,
Book 5, Page 5, of
Ventura County.
feet of Lot 16, Block E, Townsite Moorpark,
State of California, as per Map recorded in
Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of
-2- ....
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 6
EXHIBIT B
MAP OF PARCEL ATTACHED
0 ', `;) I-IL 9
10066 EXHIBIT B
10039
10. 19996- o
10038 0Z 1..: 07
Q �
STREET CHARLES STREET
so
ti ,^
w VI
h
w
O
LA . m
sa
?+
(,�
10
11
12
13
146
X15„
B
IG�
pI�
bO
ci
Jim
093
(a
19
0.
" 8
7 I G
5"' 4
3
2
1, in
I�
VI
ti F
Q
..J
O
Z
0
Q
201
'_ loo
FAIN EaK. Plat Map c �.�0
ITEM Ot . G -
4" ? _1
Lp - IS -2003
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL -
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE: June 11, 2003 (CC Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee
for Specific Plan No. 2 (Pardee)
DISCUSSION:
There are several issues concerning the referenced project
including potential grading of the reserved rights -of -way for SR
23 and SR 118 extensions, formation of a Community Facilities
District for financing of certain public improvements for the
project, and proposed modifications to the approved project. It
is recommended that a two - person Council Ad Hoc Committee be
appointed to assist in developing a recommendation to the City
Council on these matters.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint a City Council Ad Hoc Committee.
SK:db
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Appoint SP No 2- Pardee -Ad Hoc Committee 0618 2003.doc
vnvl "�
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
Honorable City Council
ITEM 01- 4 .
A_f?proVej . AdD
2eso ZooZ - Zol 5��
P` ��'?
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk :-TI>5T-
June 11, 2003 (CC Meeting of 6/18/03)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure for
Council Meetings and Related Functions and Activities and
Rescinding Resolution No. 2002 -2016
BACKGROUND
At the City Council's regular meeting on June 4, 2003, staff was
directed to schedule the City Council's Rules of Procedure Resolution
for the June 18, 2003 agenda, so as to allow the regular meeting
start time to be amended from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
DISCUSSION
A draft resolution is attached (Attachment 2), which incorporates
recommended revisions to the Rules of Procedure, as shown with the
use of legislative format.
The Council's directed revision to the regular meeting start time is
reflected in Section 11.1 (Meeting Time and Schedule) on Page 21 of
the draft Rules, to revise the regular meeting start time from 6:30
p.m. to 7:00 p.m. As further directed by the Council, the effective
date of the Resolution would be August 20, 2003. Staff has made
other editorial corrections in the Rules of Procedure related to the
change in meeting start time, with the exception of the designated
time period of 10:30 p.m. for consideration of reordering of the
agenda.
Section 2.3 (Special Meeting Agenda Format) on Pages 2 and 3 of the
draft Rules was revised to clarify that not all regular items of
business may be included.
Section 2.11 (Public Hearings) on Page 6 and Section 2.12
(Presentation /Action /Discussion Items) on Pages 7 and 8 of the draft
Rules were revised pertaining to written statement cards. Staff has
found that it is not reasonable to include all of the names in the
meeting minutes of those persons submitting written statement cards.
For some projects, hundreds of written statement cards have been
submitted. Staff is recommending that no names be included in the
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003, Regular Meeting
Page 2
minutes for written statement cards. The number in support or
opposition to an item would continue to be included. In addition,
there is a minimum two -year records retention requirement for written
statement cards, so the comments received are available for review
during this time period. Another proposed amendment to Section 2.12
(Presentation /Action /Discussion Items) on Page 7 of the draft Rules
is to include a reference to Testimony by Applicant, for those
situations when a development project related issue is scheduled
under Presentation /Action/ Discussion, and there is a logical order
to allowing the applicant to give testimony before other public
comments.
Section 2.14 (Closed Session) on Page 8 of the draft Rules was
revised to include reference to Section 54963 of the Government Code,
which was adopted by the State Legislature and became effective in
January 2003, and pertains to prohibiting disclosure of closed
session information.
Section 3.1 (Presiding Officer, Selection and Term) on Page 9 of the
draft Rules was revised to be consistent with State law revisions,
which became effective in January 2003 (Government Code and Elections
Code), pertaining to the date the Council would need to declare the
election results and select the Mayor Pro Tempore (for an even
numbered year).
Section 4.4 (Conflict of Interest) on Page 11 of the draft Rules was
revised to be consistent with Government Code Section 87105, which
was adopted by the State Legislature and became effective in January
2003, and pertains to the procedure for identifying a conflict of
interest or potential conflict of interest.
STAFF RECObMNDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2003-
Attachment: Draft Resolution
_L A�
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REVISED RULES OF
PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS AND RELATED
FUNCTIONS AND ACTIVITIES AND RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -2016
WHEREAS, Section 2.04.040 of the Moorpark Municipal Code
requires that the City Council adopt Rules of Procedure to govern
the conduct of its meetings and any of its other functions and
activities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that revisions to
the Rules of Procedure are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Revised Rules of Procedure for City Council
Meetings and Related Functions and Activities are hereby adopted,
to read as follows:
1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1 Purpose:
The purpose and intent of the City Council in adopting the
within rules shall be to provide directory guidelines relating to
the conduct of the public business by the Council. In the event
of any noncompliance with, or violation of, any provision herein,
such shall not be deemed to affect the validity of any action
taken, unless otherwise specifically provided by law.
1.2 Procedures in Absence of Rules:
In the absence of a rule herein to govern a point or
procedure, Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised, shall be used
as a guide.
2. ORDER OF BUSINESS
2.1 Agenda:
The Order of Business of each meeting shall be as contained
in the Agenda prepared by the City Clerk. The Agenda shall be a
listing by topic of the items of business which shall be
transacted or discussed in the following order:
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Proclamations and Commendations
S. Public Comments*
6. Reordering of, and Additions to, the Agenda
(Items to be pulled from the Consent Calendar shall be
identified under this section)
7. Announcements and Future Agenda Items
8. Public Hearings
9. Presentations /Action /Discussion
10. Consent Calendar
11. Ordinances
12. Closed Session
(If none are scheduled to be held prior to the Agenda
deadline, then Agenda shall so indicate.)
13. Adjournment
2.2 Roll Call Vote and Priority Notation on Agenda:
Items, which require a roll call vote, shall be so noted on
the agenda. Presentations /Action /Discussion items, which are
judged by the City Manager to be of high priority, shall be
indicated by an asterisk.
2.3 Special Meeting Agenda Format:
The order of business of special meeting agendas shall
generally be consistent with the order of business of regular
* Following the Public Comments, the Council would recess to
convene the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 3
meeting agendas, although not all regular items of businesst-l:�e
mayne-t- be
included. Public Comments shall be included on all special meeting
agendas.
2.4 Delivery of Agenda:
Barring insurmountable difficulties, the Agenda for regular
meetings shall be delivered ordinarily to Councilmembers each
Friday preceding the meeting to which it pertains.
The Agenda shall also be available to the general public after
it is posted. Agenda reports will not be available to the general
public until after distribution to the Council.
2.5 Call to Order:
The meeting of the Council shall be called to order by the
Mayor or, in his or her absence, by the Mayor Pro Tempore who shall
serve until the arrival of the Mayor. In the absence of both the
Mayor and the Mayor Pro Tempore, the meeting shall be called to
order by the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall immediately call for
the selection of a temporary Presiding Officer who shall serve
until the arrival of the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore or until
adjournment.
2.6 Roll Call /Quorum:
Before proceeding with the business of the Council, the City
Clerk shall call the roll of the Councilmembers and the names of
those present shall be entered in the minutes. The order of the
initial roll call shall be alphabetical with the Mayor called last.
Unless otherwise provided for by law, a majority of the Council
shall constitute a quorum sufficient to do business.
2.7 Proclamations and Commendations:
Proclamations and Commendations shall be limited to regular
Council meetings.
2.8 Reordering of, and Additions to, the Agenda:
Except with majority consent of the Councilmembers present and
voting, items may not be taken out of order.
At this time, Councilmembers, the City Manager, City Attorney
or City Clerk may request that any item on the Consent Calendar be
withdrawn from the consent agenda for separate consideration.
Items withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be considered
.r �1.dL bod
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 4
immediately after action on the Consent Calendar in the order that
they were withdrawn.
Any Councilmember, the City Manager, the City Attorney or the
City Clerk may bring to the attention of the Council new items of
business for discussion and action in the event of an emergency
situation or when the need to take immediate action comes to the
attention of the City subsequent to the posting of the agenda, as
specified in Government Code Section 54954.2. A two- thirds vote of
the Council, or, if less than two- thirds are present, a unanimous
vote of those who are present, is required to add an item to the
agenda.
In addition to having the opportunity to reorder the agenda as
order of business number 5, the Mayor shall suspend the item under
discussion at 10:30 p.m. in order that the agenda may be reordered
by majority vote of the Councilmembers present and voting. The
City Clerk will notify the Mayor that the time for reordering the
agenda has arrived.
2.9 Public Comments:
Any member of the public may address the Council on any
subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council which is not
listed on the Agenda as a Public Hearing or Presentations/
Action /Discussion item. Speakers will be heard in the order that
their speaker cards are received by the City Clerk prior to the
Call to Order of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes
shall be imposed upon each speaker. Speaker cards must be
presented in person by the person wishing to speak. The passing of
time from one speaker to another or speaking in place of another
speaker is not allowed. No speaker will be allowed to speak after
all speaker cards are called. By majority vote of the
Councilmembers present and voting, the number of speakers shall be
limited at any single meeting. The speaker shall be governed by
the rules of Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3. Councilmembers shall
reserve their comments and responses until the end of the Public
Comments period.
Speakers may be heard at greater length at the end of the
agenda by majority vote of the Councilmembers present and voting.
The City Clerk shall hold over to the next adjourned regular or
regular meeting, timely submitted speaker cards of speakers who
were not heard during the Public Comments period, and those
speakers shall be given priority in the order that their speaker
cards were originally received during the Public Comments period of
the next meeting.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 5
Speakers at a regular meeting will not be allowed to address
the same subject at an adjourned meeting of the regular meeting at
which they spoke, except by a four - fifth's majority vote of the
Council.
2.10 Consent Calendar:
Minutes of previous City Council meetings, items of a routine
nature and items recommended to be received and filed shall be
placed on the Consent Calendar. All items may be approved by one
blanket motion by unanimous vote of those present and voting.
However, a Councilmember may abstain from voting on any Consent
Calendar item without requesting its withdrawal, and the City Clerk
shall record any such abstention in the minutes. An abstention
shall be considered to be a vote in favor of the motion for
purposes of determining unanimous consent.
Prior to a motion on the Consent Calendar, any Councilmember
may request that any item be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar
for individual consideration. Items withdrawn from the Consent
Calendar shall be considered immediately after action on the
Consent Calendar in the order that they were withdrawn, including
any items requested to be withdrawn under Section 2.8 (Reordering
of, and additions to, the Agenda).
2.11 Public Hearings:
Items shall be placed under this topic if: (i) a public
hearing is required by law; (ii) the item is the consideration of
an application or an appeal; or (iii) the item has been set for
public hearing by the City Council.
Public hearings shall be conducted in the following order:
Staff Report
Questions of Staff by Council
Hearing Opened by Mayor
Testimony by Applicant
Other Public Testimony
Rebuttal by Applicant
Questions by Council
Hearing Closed by Mayor
A OM ell
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 6
Discussion by Council
Action by Council
Any public hearing, which is continued from one meeting to
another, shall be placed first on the Agenda under Public Hearings,
and if more than one, shall appear in the same order as shown on
the previous Agenda. The order of the Agenda under Public Hearings
may not be changed, except with the unanimous consent of the
Councilmembers present.
Questions or comments from the public shall be limited to the
item under consideration and the speaker shall be governed by the
provisions of Sections 6.1 and 6.2. A limitation of five (5)
minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker at the initial public
hearing. Depending upon the extent of the Agenda and the number of
persons desiring to speak on an item, the Mayor may at the
beginning of a continued public hearing limit testimony, but in no
event to less than three (3) minutes per individual. Speaker cards
must be presented in person by the person wishing to speak. The
passing of time from one speaker to another or speaking in place of
another speaker is not allowed.
An applicant's initial presentation shall be limited to twenty
(20) minutes, including consultant participation. Subsequent
presentations by an applicant shall be limited to ten (10) minutes.
Quasijudicial hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the
principles of due process, and the City Attorney shall advise the
City Council in this regard of any modification of, or addition to,
the conduct of the hearing set forth in this subsection.
Written statement cards may be submitted in lieu of addressing
the Council. The number of cards received in favor of or in
opposition to a public hearing item under consideration will be
verbally reported to the Council by the City Clerk along with a
brief summary of specific concerns /comments listed on each card.
The verbal report will be given following the last public speaker
for the public hearing and prior to the rebuttal by the applicant.
The total
number of written statement cards received in favor, of or i.n
opposition to an item will be recorded in the minutes of the
meeting, and the written statement cards will become a part of the
official record.
2.12 Presentations /Action /Discussion Items:
Items that involve the establishment of City policy and items
of a non - routine nature shall be placed under this topic.
..r _Li-W
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 7
Presentations to the City Council by other public agencies or
groups will be listed first under the Presentations /Action/
Discussion heading. Continued Presentations /Action /Discussion
items will appear in the order they previously appeared, following
presentations.
Discussion /Action items shall be conducted in the following
order:
Staff Report
Questions of Staff by Council
Testimony by Applicant
Public Comment
Discussion by Council
Action by Council
Questions or comments from the public shall be limited to the
item under consideration and the speaker shall be governed by the
provisions of Sections 6.1 and 6.2. Speakers will be heard in the
order that their speaker cards are received by the City Clerk for
the item during which the speaker wishes to address the Council.
However, a proponent /applicant may be heard first during the public
comment for a Presentations /Action /Discussion item, if so
determined by the Mayor, but no rebuttal by the proponent /applicant
shall be allowed. All speaker cards for all items must be received
prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentations/
Action /Discussion portion of the agenda. A limitation of three (3)
minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. Speaker cards must be
presented in person by the person wishing to speak. The passing of
time from one speaker to another or speaking in place of another
speaker is not allowed. No speaker will be allowed to speak after
all speaker cards are called.
At the beginning of the Presentations /Action /Discussion
portion of the agenda, the Mayor will announce that all speaker
cards for all items on the Presentations /Action /Discussion portion
of the agenda must be received prior to the start of the first item
taken under this section of the agenda.
Written statement cards may be submitted in lieu of
addressing the Council. The number of cards received in favor of or
eppes in opposition to an item being considered will be verbally
reported to the Council by the City Clerk following the last public
speaker for an item. The nafftes of thes n
Fia1,1" "It
�
v . �J E1j
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 8
statement eards The total number of written statement cards
received in favor of or in opposition to an item will be recorded
in the minutes of the meeting and the written statement cards
will become a part of the official record.
2.13 Announcements /Future Aqenda Items:
Any Councilmember who has not previously requested during the
meeting to have an item placed on a future agenda may do so under
this topic.
2.14 Closed Session:
A Closed Session to be held at the conclusion of a meeting
shall begin no later than 11230 a.ml2:00 midnight. If it is
determined by the Mayor and City Manager that a Special meeting for
Closed Session is required prior to a Regular meeting to help
control the length of the Regular meeting, it shall begin at
.!456:15 p.m. unless less time is anticipated to be needed.
Section 54963 of the Government Code, and any statutes
amendatory or supplementary thereto, prohibiting disclosure of
closed session information to any person not entitled to receive
such information unless the City Council authorizes disclosure of
that information, are hereby incorporated by reference.
2.15 Adjournment:
It is the policy of the City Council that upon reaching :3
p.f;,i.12:00 midnight, the City Council will not address any new
agenda items, with the exception of closed session items. Should
the City Council continue to address an in- progress non - closed
session agenda item past 12:830 Fftid rta.m., the following motion
is in order:
Move that the City Council meeting tonight may extend
beyond the 12:00 midnight deadline to conclude the item
in progress.
3. PRESIDING OFFICER
3.1 Selection and Term:
The Mayor shall be the Presiding Officer at all meetings of
the Council, except as otherwise provided in Section 2.5 (Call to
Order). The office of Mayor is an elective office with a two -year
term.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 9
In accordance with Government Code Section 36801, the Council
shall meet er= �the 'T- e��yafter eertif=eati-en e-�e results -e=
ea-eh at the regularly scheduled meeting next following the
decla_r_ation of the election results pursuant to Section 10262 and
10263 of the Elections Code (completion of the canvass by the
elections official shall occur no later than the third Friday after
the election) for a general municipal election (even numbered
years) and shall also meet at the last regular meeting in November
of each odd numbered year to choose one of its number as Mayor Pro
Tempore. Each selection shall be by three (3) or more affirmative
votes, and a failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes
shall be deemed a selection of the incumbent to remain in office.
Each person so selected shall serve until a successor is chosen (at
any time) by three (3) or more affirmative votes.
In the case of a vacancy in the office of the Mayor for any
reason, said vacancy shall be filled in compliance with State law.
3.2 Participation of Presiding Officer:
The Presiding Officer may move, second and debate from the
chair, subject only to such limitations of debate as are imposed on
all councilmembers. He or she shall be accorded all of the rights
and privileges of a councilmember.
3.3 Maintenance of Order:
The Presiding Officer is responsible for the maintenance of
order and decorum at all times. The head of the City's police
agency or his or her designee shall be ex- officio sergeant -at -arms
of the Council. He or she shall carry out all orders and
instructions given him or her by the Presiding Officer for the
purpose of maintaining order and decorum in the Council Chambers.
3.4 Rulings Final Unless Overruled:
The Presiding Officer shall decide all questions of
interpretation of these rules, points of order, maintenance of
order or other questions of procedure requiring rulings. Any such
decision shall be final and shall be binding and legally effective
(even though clearly erroneous) for purposes of the item under
consideration, unless overridden by a majority vote of the
Councilmembers present and voting. Any Councilmember may seek to
have the Presiding Officer's decision overridden by moving the
question "Shall the decision of the Presiding Officer be
sustained ?"
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 10
4. CONDUCT OF COUNCILMEMBERS
4.1 Decorum and Order:
(a) Any Councilmember desiring to speak shall address
the chair and, upon recognition by the Presiding Officer, shall
confine himself or herself to the item under debate.
(b) A Councilmember desiring to question the staff shall
address his or her question to the City Manager, City Attorney or
Department head, as appropriate, who shall be entitled either to
answer the inquiry or to designate some member of his or her staff
for that purpose.
(c) A Councilmember, once recognized, shall not be
interrupted while speaking unless called to order by the Presiding
Officer, a point of order is raised by another Councilmember
pursuant to Section 3.4 or the speaker chooses to yield to
questions from another Councilmember.
(d) Any Councilmember called to order while he or she is
speaking shall cease speaking immediately until the question of
order is determined. If ruled to be in order he or she shall be
permitted to proceed. If ruled out of order he or she shall remain
silent or shall alter his or her remarks so as to comply with the
rules.
(e) Councilmember shall accord the utmost courtesy to
each other, to City employees, and to the public appearing before
the Council. They shall refrain at all times from rude and
derogatory remarks, abusive comments and statements as to
integrity, motives or personalities.
(f) The right of a Councilmember to address the Council
on a question of personal privilege shall be limited to cases in
which his or her integrity, character, or motives are assailed,
questioned or impugned.
(g) Any Councilmember may move to require the Presiding
Officer to enforce the rules. The affirmative vote of a majority
of the Council present and voting shall require the Presiding
Officer to so act.
4.2 Limitation of Debate:
A Councilmember should not speak more than once upon any one
item until every other member choosing to speak thereon has spoken.
No member shall speak for a longer time than five (5) minutes each
D Fq � ►, f® �'1
�e _e.% -J
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 11
time he or she has the floor, without the approval of a majority
vote of the Council present and voting.
4.3 Dissents and Protests:
Any Councilmember shall have the right to express dissent
from, or protest to, any action of the Council and to have the
reason entered in the minutes. If such dissent or protest is
desired to be entered in the minutes, this should be made clear by
language such as, "I would like the minutes to show that I am
opposed to this action for the following reasons. . . ."
4.4 Conflict of Interest:
the eenfliet.
Section 87105 describes the procedure to be followed if an
official has a conflict of interest on a matter and cannot
participate in a decision. Section 87105 shall apply to the City
Council, the City Manager, City Attorney, and Planning Commission.
The official must publicly identify the financial interest (not
including the address of a personal residence), recuse himself or
herself from voting, and _leave the room until after the discussion,
.__...... - -- - - - - - -- .._._. _. ._.. -. - - -.�
vote and other disposition of the matter is concluded. If the
matter is on the consent calendar, the official need not leave the
room, but must still make the required disclosure on the record and
abstain from voting. The official also may speak on the issue as a
member of the general public, during the public comment period on
that matter, solely to represent himself or herself on a matter
related to his or her personal interest. Section 87105 of the
Government Code, and any statutes amendatory or supplementary
_ . ................... - ........ - -- -- .......- ..._..._.. -- -- -.._.. _
t- iereto, are hereby .incorporated by reference.
5. CONDUCT OF EMPLOYEES
5.1 Decorum and Order:
(a) Members of the staff and employees of the City shall
observe the same rules of procedure and decorum applicable to
members of the Council.
ch I 'q
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 12
(b) The City Manager shall insure that all staff members
and employees observe such decorum.
(c) Any staff member or employee, including the City
Manager, desiring to address the Council or members of the public
shall first be recognized by the chair. All remarks shall be
addressed to the chair and not to any one individual Councilmember
or member of the public.
6. CONDUCT OF THE PUBLIC
6.1 Decorum and Order:
(a) Members of the public attending Council meetings
shall observe the same rules of order and decorum applicable to the
Council pursuant to Section 4.1.
(b) Willful conduct that is disruptive, including but
not limited to, unauthorized remarks from the audience, stamping of
feet, whistles, yells and similar demonstrations shall be
prohibited by the Presiding Officer. Any person who becomes
willfully disruptive while addressing the Council or while
attending the Council meeting shall be removed from the room if the
sergeant -at -arms is so directed by the Presiding Officer.
Aggravated cases shall be prosecuted on appropriate complaint
signed by the Presiding Officer.
6.2 Manner of Addressing the Council:
No person shall address the Council without being recognized
by the Presiding Officer. Any member of the public desiring to
address the Council shall proceed to the podium and wait to be
recognized by the Presiding Officer. After being recognized, the
speaker shall state his or her name and address for the record. All
remarks and questions shall be addressed to the chair and not to
any individual Councilmember, staff member or other person.
6.3 Limitations on Addressing the Council:
The making of oral communications to the Council by any member
of the public during the "Public Comments" portion of the Agenda
shall be subject to the following limitations:
(a) No speaker shall be permitted to address the Council
under "Public Comments" on a public hearing item which is on the
agenda or which is not on the Agenda but which has been scheduled
or is under submission for a public hearing before the Council.
•.• v _i.. ae J
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 13
(b) No speaker shall be permitted to address the Council
under "Public Comments" on a Presentations /Action /Discussion item,
which is on the agenda.
(c) No speaker shall be permitted to address the Council
on an item which is currently before or is under submission for
consideration by a City commission, board, committee or officer
before which the speaker should make his or her presentation, until
that body has completed its deliberations and taken its final
action. In case the speaker should have followed an otherwise
available appeal procedure, the Presiding Officer shall not allow
oral communication to the Council outside that procedure.
(d) The Chair or other member of the City's Planning
Commission and Park and Recreation Commission may submit written
comments or verbally address the Council on any item for which that
body has completed its deliberations and taken its final action,
for the purpose of explaining the Commission's recommendation. The
speaker shall be governed by the provisions of Sections 2.9, 2.11,
2.12, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3. Written comments from Commissioners shall
be governed by the provisions of Section 10.3.
(e) No speaker shall be permitted to include charges or
complaints against any employee of the City, or any employee of a
private firm or public agency providing a contract service to the
City, regardless of whether such employee is identified in the
presentation by name or by any other reference which tends to
identify the employee. All charges or complaints against an
employee shall be submitted to the City Manager for appropriate
action, and may also be submitted to members of the Council by
written communication.
(f) If it appears that several speakers desire to speak
regarding any item on the Agenda, the Presiding Officer may
reasonably limit the number of speakers on each side of the issue.
In this regard, preference may be given to speakers who represent
groups of persons who have designated a spokesperson.
6.4 Video, Audiotape, PowerPoint, Slide or Similar Presentation:
Video, audiotape, PowerPoint, slide or similar presentation
will be disallowed unless relative to an item on the agenda. The
video, audiotape, PowerPoint, slide or similar presentation must be
made by the person or agency making the presentation. The Council
may limit the total amount of time allocated for presentations on
particular issues and for each speaker. The same limitations that
govern speakers under Sections 2.9, 2.11 and 2.12 shall apply.
Presentations shall be limited to the subject matter jurisdiction
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 14
of the Council. Those items not germane to the agenda will be
disallowed.
7. MOTIONS
7.1 Processing of Motions:
When a motion is made and seconded, it shall be stated by the
Presiding Officer or, at the request of the Presiding Officer, by
the City Clerk before debate. A motion so stated shall not be
withdrawn by the mover without the consent of the person seconding
it.
7.2 Division of Motion:
If the motion contains two or more divisible propositions, the
Presiding Officer may, and upon request of any Councilmember shall,
divide the same, unless a majority of the Councilmembers present
and voting votes not to do so.
7.3 Precedence of Motions:
When a motion is before the Council, no motion shall be
entertained except the following, which shall have precedence in
the following order.
The ordinary motions rank as follows, and any of them (except
to amend) can be made while one of a lower order is pending, but
none can supersede one of a higher order. Motions to limit
discussion, to call the question and to suspend the rules require a
two- thirds vote; all other motions require only a majority vote:
Not Debatable:
To Fix the Time of Adjournment )
To Adjourn (when unqualified) ) Cannot
To Table ) be
To Limit Discussion (2/3 vote) ) Amended
To Call the Question (2/3 vote) )
To Suspend the Rules (2/3 vote) )
Debatable:
To Postpone to a Certain Time )
To Commit or Refer to Committee) Can be
To Amend ) Amended
To Postpone Indefinitely )
The Motion to Reconsider: the motion can be made when any other
motion is before the assembly, but cannot be acted upon until the
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 15
business then before the assembly is disposed of; when called up, it
takes precedence over all other motions, except to adjourn, and to
fix the time to which to adjourn.
Motions incidental to those before the assembly take precedence
over them and must be acted upon first.
7.4 Motion to Fix Hour of Adjournment:
Such a motion shall be to set a definite time at which to
adjourn and may be amended by unanimous vote.
7.5 Motion to Adjourn:
Such a motion shall be in order at any time, except as follows:
(a) When repeated without intervening business or
discussion;
(b) When made as an interruption of another Councilmember
while speaking;
(c) When discussion has been ended and a vote on the
motion is pending; or
(d) While a vote is being taken.
A motion to adjourn "to another time" shall be debatable, but
only as to the time to which the meeting is adjourned.
7.6 Motion to Table:
Such a motion shall be used to temporarily bypass the subject
and shall preclude all amendments or debate of the subject under
consideration. If the motion prevails, the item may be taken from
the table at any time prior to the end of the next regular meeting.
7.7 Motion to Limit Discussion:
Such a motion shall be used to limit the time allowed each
Councilmember to speak to, or to appoint a time at which discussion
shall close on, the question of the main motion and any previously
made amendment to the main motion. If a motion to limit the time
allowed each member to speak passes, no member shall thereafter
speak more than two times to the question nor longer than the time
allowed at either time and no member shall speak the second time
until every member choosing to speak has spoken.
afV0 "I
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 16
7.8 Motion to Call the Question:
Such a motion shall be used to close debate on, and further
amendment to, the main motion. If the motion fails, debate shall
be reopened; if the motion passes, a vote shall next be taken on
any previously made amendments to the main motion and finally on
the main motion.
7.9 Motion to Suspend the Rules:
Such a motion shall be used to suspend these rules of
procedure and shall include a statement of the purpose of the
suspension. If the motion fails, the motion shall not be renewed
for the same purpose at the same meeting, but it may be renewed for
the same purpose at an adjourned meeting of that meeting.
7.10 Motion to Postpone to a Certain Time:
Such a motion shall be amendable and debatable only as to
propriety of postponement and time set.
7.11 Motion to Amend:
Such a motion shall be debatable only as to the amendment. A
motion to amend an amendment shall be in order, but a motion to
amend an amendment to an amendment shall not be in order. An
amendment modifying the intention of a motion shall be in order,
but an amendment relating to a different matter shall not be in
order. A substitute motion on the same subject shall be
acceptable, and voted on before a vote on the amendment.
Amendments shall be voted first, then the main motion as amended.
7.12 Motion Reconsideration:
Any Councilmember who voted with the majority may move a
reconsideration of any vote at the same meeting or request an
agenda item on the next regular meeting or request a special
meeting called to be held prior to the next regular meeting to
consider reconsideration of any vote. The agenda item shall appear
on Presentation /Action /Discussion as a two -part item, e.g.,
Consider Reconsideration of
Reconsideration of vote on
After a motion for reconsideration has once been acted upon,
no other motion for a reconsideration thereof shall be made without
unanimous consent of the Council.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 17
8. VOTING
8.1 Restatement of the Motion:
Upon the request of any Councilmember, the Presiding Officer
shall verbally restate each motion immediately prior to calling for
the vote.
8.2 Voting Procedure:
In acting upon every motion, the vote shall be taken by voice,
roll call or any other method by which the vote of each
Councilmember present can be clearly ascertained. The vote on each
motion shall then be entered in full upon the record. The order of
voting shall be the maker of the motion, the second and, in
rotating alphabetical order, the remaining members seated, for each
item on the agenda requiring a roll call vote. The Clerk shall
call the names of all members seated when a roll call vote is
ordered or required. Members shall respond 'aye', 'no' or
'abstain', provided that when a vote is collectively taken by voice
or when a method of voting other than by voice or roll call is
used, any Councilmember not audibly and clearly responding 'no' or
'abstain' or otherwise registering an objection shall have his or
her vote recorded as 'aye'.
Following the vote, the Presiding Officer shall verbally
announce whether the motion carried or was defeated. The Presiding
Officer may also publicly state the effect of the vote for the
benefit of the audience before proceeding to the next item of
business.
Any member may change his or her vote before the next item of
business is called.
8.3 Roll Call Voting:
The following matters require three (3) affirmative votes: a)
adoption of ordinances, b) resolutions granting franchises and c)
resolutions and orders for payment of money or appropriation of
funds; a roll call vote shall be used for these items. A roll call
vote shall not be used for any other item before the Council unless
demanded by any Councilmember. It shall not be in order for
members to explain their vote during roll call.
8.4 Failure to Vote:
Every Councilmember should vote unless disqualified for cause.
A Councilmember who abstains from voting on an item because of
being disqualified shall be considered as if absent.
C' o!�
�' � _I . _: 0
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 18
8.5 Tie Votes:
When no Councilmember abstains from voting, the motion shall
be lost on a tie vote. Any member who abstains and is not
considered absent shall be deemed to have acquiesced to the motion
and the motion shall be passed on a tie vote.
When all Councilmembers are present, a tie vote on whether to
grant an appeal from official action or on a quasi - judicial matter
shall be considered a denial of such appeal or matter, unless the
Council takes other action to further consider the appeal or
matter. If a tie vote results at a time when less than all members
of the Council are present, the matter shall automatically be
continued to the agenda of the next regular meeting of the Council,
unless otherwise ordered by the Council.
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
9.1 Definition:
The legislative acts of the Council (rules of public conduct
for long -term application) are taken by ordinance.
Routine business and administrative matters (usually more
temporary and transitory in nature) are accomplished by
"resolution," "minute order" or "motion" (thereafter recorded by
minute entry) . Technically, all three are equally as legally
effective and binding; they just vary in the formality of
respective memorialization. The most formal is referred to as a
"resolution," which will be recorded by a separate document,
numbered in sequence and preserved in a separate set of books, in
addition to being referenced in the minutes. Such "resolutions"
are used for various reasons, such as when specifically required by
law, when needed as a separate evidentiary document to be
transmitted to another governmental agency, or where the frequency
of future reference back to its contents warrants a separate
document. The "motion" or "minute order" is a Council action which
is recorded simply by an item entry in the minutes of the meeting
at which it was accomplished, and no separate document is made to
memorialize it. The City Clerk is empowered by State law to
furnish certified excerpts of the minutes in order to facilitate
the administrative process to which a particular action pertains.
9.2 When Prepared in Advance:
All ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of
introduction or passage, unless, after reading the title, further
G, C.'►,I1i
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 19
reading is waived by a majority vote of the Councilmembers present
and voting.
When a resolution has been prepared in advance, it need not be
read in full or by title, except to identify it. A majority vote
of the Councilmembers present and voting will require that the
resolution be read in full.
9.3 When Not Prepared in Advance:
When an ordinance or resolution has not been prepared in
advance, the Council, by majority vote of the members present and
voting, shall instruct the City Manager or the City Attorney to
prepare it for presentation at a specified later time in the same
meeting or at a future Council meeting.
9.4 Urgencv Resolutions:
A resolution may be presented verbally in motion form,
together with instructions for written preparation for later
execution, in an emergency situation or when the need to take
immediate action came to the attention of the City subsequent to
the posting of the agenda, as specified in Government Code Section
54954.2. A two- thirds vote of the Council, or, if less than two -
thirds are present, a unanimous vote of those who are present, is
required to add a resolution to the agenda. Such resolutions shall
not be presented when resolutions are required by law, in
improvement acts, zoning matters, or force account work on public
projects.
10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
10.1 Addressed to Council as a Whole:
The City Manager or designee is authorized to receive and open
all written communications addressed to the Council as a whole and
give it immediate attention to the end that all administrative
business referred to in said communications, and not necessarily
requiring Council action, may be disposed of between Council
meetings. The City Manager shall cause a copy of such
communication to be sent to each Councilmember.
10.2 All Other Written Communications:
Any written communication received at City Hall addressed to
the Mayor and /or an individual Councilmember shall be opened by the
City Manager or his or her designee and a copy of such
communication shall be provided to each of the other members.
c
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 20
Any Councilmember who receives any written communication on
any subject related to the business of the City, whether or not
received at City Hall, shall cause a copy to be provided to the
City Clerk who shall cause a copy of such communication to be sent
to each of the other members.
All outgoing Councilmember correspondence will be copied to
the Council reading file unless the Council is listed as a carbon
copy, in which case each Councilmember will be provided an
individual copy. Any Councilmember who generates any written
communication related to the business of the City, other than at
City Hall, shall cause a copy to be provided to the City Clerk for
distribution. Letters produced by City staff for Councilmembers
will be created on official City letterhead, only.
10.3 Agenda Item Communications:
Any such communication, which relates to an item pending or to
be brought before the Council shall be included in the agenda
packet for the meeting at which such item is to be considered. If
a Councilmember generates an agenda item, the Councilmember will
prepare a brief, written explanation including action/
recommendation to the full Council. All agenda staff reports will
be provided to the full Council with the distribution of the
agenda.
Regardless of the source, it will take a four - fifth's majority
vote of the Council to accept additional agenda material on the day
of the Council meeting at which the item is to be considered.
All materials distributed by any person during a public
meeting related to the subject matter being discussed or considered
will be made available for public inspection at the meeting if
prepared by City staff or a member of the Council, or after the
meeting, if the materials were prepared by some other person in
accordance with Section 54957.5 (b) of the Brown Act.
Written communication for a non - public hearing agenda item
presented at the meeting for reading will be acknowledged by the
Mayor but not read. The Mayor will note general content, and
whether the content of the communication is in opposition or
support of an agenda item.
Written communication relative to a public hearing item, if
presented prior to the close of the business day, will be copied
for the Council, applicant, and the public agenda binder.
The public shall tender a written request to the City Manager
and /or the Mayor regarding the placement on the agenda of any
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 21
items. The City Manager and Mayor will then discuss and determine
the appropriateness of the requested item being placed on a future
agenda.
Letters of appeal from administrative or commission decisions
shall be processed under applicable provisions of the Municipal
Code or other ordinance.
10.4 Research:
Any research requested by an individual Councilmember that
results in a written response from staff will be copied to all
Councilmembers. This is not meant to include copies of documents
on file.
11. COUNCIL MEETINGS
11.1 Meeting Time and Schedule:
The regular meetings of the City Council shall begin at the
hour of 61307:00 p.m. on the first and third Wednesday of each
month. In addition to regularly scheduled meetings as set forth in
Section 2.04.010 of the Municipal Code, an adjourned meeting will
be held on the second Wednesday of the month as needed. The fourth
Wednesday will only be scheduled when required for meetings with
special purposes or for a study session on a complex issue as
determined by the Mayor and the City Manager.
12. ANNUAL REVIEW
The City Clerk will annually review the Rules of Procedure
with the Mayor and City Manager.
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall become effective and
Resolution No. 2002 -2016 shall be rescinded on August 20, 2003.
The change in regular City Council meeting start time from 6:30
p.m. to 7:00 p.m. shall begin with the August 20, 2003 regular
Council meeting.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed
in the book of original resolutions.
V 1a/ '�✓ S A J A A
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 22
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM q •
----- Lo_ -_ts -200 3
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development DirectZ1,1714,
Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner
DATE: June 5, 2003 (CC Meeting of 6/18/03)
SUBJECT: Consider the Adoption of a City Policy for the
Application of Photovoltaic Systems on New
Construction and Existing Facilities within the City
BACKGROUND
On February 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution 2002-
1938, approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5381 and the
accompanying Residential Planned Development No. 99 -02.
Condition No. 19(v) of this resolution requires that the CC &R's
for this development include "Language requiring a photovoltaic
system to be installed and maintained for each residential
dwelling unit, if the City adopts a policy and standards for
photovoltaic systems prior to January 31, 2004, or approval of
the first Final Map, whichever is later."
Subsequently, the City Council adopted its City Council Goals
and Objectives for 2002/2003. In these Goals, Departmental
Objective G -17 states that the Community Development shall
"Analyze feasibility and if feasible, prepare policy and
standards requiring installation of a photovoltaic system for
residential projects for consideration by Planning Commission
and City Council by June 30, 2003."
DISCUSSION
The feasibility of requiring the use of photovoltaic systems on
residential uses within the City has been evaluated by the
Community Development staff based upon current costs and the
benefits obtained from the systems. Also evaluated were other
S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COUNCIL \MiSC Reports \photovoltaics.doc
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 2
impacts which may accompany this type of requirement,
particularly from design and aesthetic standpoints.
The cost of photovoltaic generation has been steadily dropping,
as technological advancements in the composition and production
of the photovoltaic cells have been made. Recent advancements
have allowed the utilization of thinner and lighter matrices for
the placement of the silicon (or other photovoltaic material)
crystals (cells) used for electrical generation. While most
"panels" still suspend the cells between panes of glass or
similar material, new technologies have allowed the development
of thin, flexible film within which the photovoltaic cells are
suspended, as well as the ability to place these cells within
roof tiles in order to integrate the cells architecturally into
a structure.
The efficiency of cells is increasing even while the size and
cost of them are shrinking. Nascent technologies include
photovoltaic cells suspended in paint, which would allow
electrical generation over an entire surface area. While these
advances are showing promise, they are not yet commercially
available.
At this time, photovoltaic systems for single family residential
homes are generally limited to large panels or solar roof tiles.
Both forms of cells can provide a considerable portion of the
electrical energy requirements for a residence. With a large
enough system, enough energy can be produced during daylight
hours that night time power usage would be nearly matched,
resulting in almost no charges from the electric company.
Additionally, battery back -up systems can be integrated into
these photovoltaic systems so that power can be maintained
during blackouts. In fact, with a large enough system of cells,
and a large enough battery system, a home could derive all of
its electrical needs from photovoltaic sources.
While this may seem to be an ideal solution to many of the power
generation problems which have plagued California in recent
years, there are constraints which reduce the feasibility of
these systems. The two major constraints are cost to the
homeowner, and the aesthetic impact on the neighborhoods in
which they are utilized.
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 3
Costs
While the cost of photovoltaic material production is decreasing
as technological advances occur, the decrease in price has not
kept pace with the decrease in prices of other technologies,
such as communications or computer technologies. The purchase
of a photovoltaic system which will provide the majority of a
home's power needs still requires a major up -front expense, and
the savings noted will not pay for themselves until the later
stages of the system's life span. In order for these systems to
reach a point where they will pay for themselves within their
life spans, the State offers incentives for purchasers of such
systems that meet certain requirements.
The incentives include a 50% rebate on the cost of the system,
and tax credits for up to 150 of the cost of the system. If the
system is financed as part of a new home purchase, refinance, or
with a home equity loan, savings are seen in the mortgage
interest deduction. These factors can bring the cost of a
system into a range where energy savings will eventually exceed
the actual money expended on the system, assuming that the cost
of electricity from the power company continues to increase over
the life of the system.
As an example, prices for photovoltaic systems are generally
running at about $8,000 - $10,000 per Kilowatt peak. A household
with an electric bill of $125.00 per month would need a 4.5
Kilowatt peak system to provide 910 of the household electrical
needs. For this example, it is assumed that 9% of the household
needs can be reduced through conservation efforts.
The assumptions used in this example are as follows:
Tax Status: Married filing jointly
Annual Income: $120,000
Mortgage: $450,000 @ 6.5% fixed for 30 years
Cost of System: $36,000 before incentives
$16,124 after incentives
House Position: South facing roof with optimal pitch
Power cost growth: 2.5% per year
Under these assumptions, even with the mortgage interest
deduction from the financing of the system, the system will
result in energy costs $68 per year more than they would be if
the power were only bought from the electric company. This
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 4
higher cost would diminish over time as the cost of purchased
power increases. In its sixth year, the system would see its
first savings over the cost of purchased power: $8 per year.
This savings would gradually increase over time, but would
eventually be tempered by the decrease in mortgage interest
deductions as the loan approaches pay -off. At the end of the
mortgage period, the photovoltaic system would have saved the
homeowner $4,718.00 in energy costs, far below the $16,124.00
cost of the system. Also important to remember is that this
does not include any maintenance costs associated with the
equipment, and assumes system prices at the lower end of the
range as well as optimal conditions for placement of panels for
maximum generation. Less than optimal conditions and higher
costs will negatively impact feasibility of these systems.
The primary factors affecting the economic feasibility of these
systems (aside from the incentives) are the size of the system
and the rate of increase of purchased power. A smaller system
would reduce the amount of power generated, increasing
dependence upon purchased power, but the initial cost of the
system and the associated finance costs would be less, resulting
in an ability for the system to eventually pay for itself,
although this point may be 15 years or more from the time of
installation.
Similarly, changes in
"break- even" point on
climb quickly over the
the system will always
power. However, if
dramatically, the phot
more quickly.
purchased power rates
the systems as well.
course of financing, it
be more expensive to ru
the cost of purchased
ovoltaic system may pay
can affect the
If rates do not
is possible that
n than purchasing
power increases
for itself much
There are a wide variety of variables which can impact the
feasibility of these systems. Economic variables, such as
purchased power costs, photovoltaic equipment costs, and
mortgage interest rates, as well as physical variables, such as
orientation of roof planes, the growth of trees on adjacent
properties, and surrounding topography, can have a tremendous
impact on the feasibility of a given system on a given home.
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 5
Aesthetic Issues
The aesthetic issues associated with these systems arise from
their very nature. The cells need to be exposed to the greatest
amount of light possible to generate power. This generally
means that they are mounted as high as possible on a given
property in order to minimize shadows from surrounding
buildings, trees, and topography.
In addition to high places being preferred, the orientation of
the panels must be aligned with the track of the sun across the
sky. This means that the panels must be on a roof plane which
faces a range of directions between southeast and southwest.
Thus, they cannot always be placed facing away from streets or
other areas of visibility from the public. The farther from the
generally southern direction the panels face, the more the
panels will need to be tilted to maximize their efficiency.
Tilting of the panels can raise them above the surface of the
roof, further accentuating their placement.
The prominent placement ensures that the visibility of the
panels will also be maximized. Camouflaging of the cells is
difficult, as tinting of the cells to blend with a given color
(while possible) results in a substantial loss in efficiency.
Because the cells are typically covered with glass, reflectivity
becomes an issue as well. As the sun moves across the sky, the
panels can be mirror -like in their ability to reflect sunlight
causing glare and visual impacts where a typical roofing
material would not. Even attempts to blend the panels into a
roof using dark gray tiles will be foiled by the reflectivity of
the panels. As with tinting, attempts to reduce the
reflectivity of the cell covering results in a loss of
efficiency.
Many visual impacts can be softened with the planting of
landscaping or the use of screens. In the case of photovoltaic
systems, the use of these techniques is limited as they often
result in screening the systems from the sunlight necessary for
their efficient function.
At least one company has produced photovoltaic cells built into
slate -like roofing tiles. These tiles allow the system to be
installed without mounting panels above the roof. The tiles can
be interspersed with non - photovoltaic tiles to spread the tiles
and reduce impact of the color and reflectivity of the system.
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 6
These are perhaps the best way to minimize the visual impact
that these systems produce, but they have a higher cost
associated with them, and generally require more work as they
most often will require a complete re- roofing of a house to
install them.
Conclusions
The contemplated requirement for photovoltaic systems to be
installed in all new residential structures is likely premature
given the state of technology at the present time. Optimal
conditions, which will not occur in the case of the majority of
homes in the City, result in only a partial reduction of
purchased power. Attempts to reach 100 percent generation of
needed power requires an investment of funds which will likely
not be recouped during the life of the system. Further, current
feasibility of even the smaller systems is dependent upon state
incentive programs, the availability of which cannot be relied
upon in future years.
Similar conclusions can be drawn about the use of these systems
for multiple family residential developments, as well as
commercial and industrial projects. These larger projects may
have large flat roof areas upon which these systems could be
installed. However, as was demonstrated by the residential
example above, as the system size increases to accommodate more
of the potential energy demands, the costs go up dramatically as
well. Even with State incentives, and accompanying tax
benefits, the "break- even" point for these systems will be in
the last few years of financing, given a 30 year loan, unless
the cost of purchased power rises in excess of 2.5% per year.
Incentives are lessened for owners of properties that are rented
to separately metered tenants, as the owner will bear the burden
of the financing, while the tenant will benefit from the savings
in power costs.
The State and the purveyors of electricity are offering
incentives to entice people to utilize these systems. There is
no guarantee that these incentives will continue, leaving open
the possibility that mandatory installation will render any
further construction infeasible due to the expense of complying
with such a requirement. Even if the incentives continue and
the power costs rise, the estimates here have assumed a 30 year
system life, which is probably very generous. Additionally, the
assumptions include no maintenance costs, which is not
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 7
realistic, especially if the system lives are expected to reach
30 years. The inclusion of these factors into the assumptions
can quickly drive the costs into even higher ranges.
However, advances in this area of technology continue to occur.
Even with the state of technology today, there are many
homeowners who are opting to utilize the photovoltaic systems
available. While it may not be feasible to require all homes to
have photovoltaic systems installed, it might be prudent to
require structures to be constructed with the appropriate
generic roof mounting hardware and flashed conduits installed to
allow residents to avail themselves of these systems should they
become more feasible in the future. This would enable each
homeowner to determine at what point cost and benefit reach a
point that warrants use of these systems in their homes.
Should the City Council determine that this type of requirement
is worth consideration, staff would advise that the City Council
also consider establishing standards which would apply to the
installation and placement of these systems. As discussed
above, the installation of these systems can cause serious
visual impacts within neighborhoods and larger viewsheds. While
the City's ability to regulate these systems is limited by State
and Federal laws, there is some legitimate ability of the City
to exercise authority to protect the visual environment.
STAFF RECODONDATIONS
1. At this time determine that requiring installation of
photovoltaic systems on all new single family residential
construction is infeasible given the costs of the current
technologies;
2. Direct staff to add to standard conditions a requirement
for all new residential construction to incorporate roof
hardware to enable photovoltaic systems to be installed in
the future without removal of roofing material;
3. Direct staff to bring to the Planning Commission for
recommendation to the City Council, proposed standards for
the placement and treatment of photovoltaic systems in
residential areas, as well as in commercial and industrial
developments, should property owners wish to voluntarily
install photovoltaic systems.
Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 8
Attachments:
Photovoltaic System Cost Estimate
Photovoltaic System Savings Estimate
Clean Power Estimator
RESULTS
(Moorpark, CA)
Build System
PV System
Size (ac)
4.5 kW •
Cost Before Rebate (ac)
$8,000 per kWJ
Tilt Direction
302 . South
S stem Life Maintenance Cost
Loan Life —' $0 per year
ASSUMPTIONS
Electric Bill Annual escalation
$1,500 per year - 2.5% per Payment Method
New Home Loan
Loan Life Loan Rate
30 years 6.50%
Home Loan
$450,000
Tax Filing Status Taxable Income
[Married - jointly __ J$120,000 per year
Southern California Edison, Domestic Service (Schedule
D)
Place cursor over the symbols marked 0 above for help
Press here if results do not show or if you are Qettina
error messages
Powered by Clean Power Research. 01998 -2002 All
rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
This system will:
• Cost $16,124 ($36,000 before incentives)
• Have a net cost of $6 per month in the first year
• Meet 91% of current electricity consumption
• Produce /save 8,390 kWh of electricity in the first year
• Eliminate 10,404 lbs of CO2 emissions in the first year
CC ATTACHMENT 1
(ems 5.r
http: / /www .clean- power.com/cec /default.asp 6/6/2003
Clean Power Estimator
RESULTS
(Moorpark, CA)
Cumulative Cash Flow
PV System
Size (ac)
4.5 kW
Cost Before Rebate (ac)
$8,000 per kW --3-
Tilt Direction
30° South
System Life Maintenance Cost
Loan Life I $0 per year
ASSUMPTIONS
Electric Bill Annual escalation
$1,500 per year 2.5% per, year .
Payment Method
New Home Loan
Loan Life Loan Rate
30 years 6.50%°
Home Loan
$450,000
Tax Filing Status Taxable Income
Married -jointly A J$120,000 per year
Southern California Edison, Domestic Service (Schedule
D)
Place cursor over the symbols marked Iabove for help
Press here if results do not show or if you are getting
error messages
Powered by Clean Power Research. 01998 -2002 All
rights reserved.
M1
$3,000
i Ell
I (3,000) 2003
Page 1 of 1
Cumulative Cash Flaw
( PV = S1,138)
• Net Savings
2018
l- w
Cumulative Net Cash Flow
203:
(Sum of the Net Cash Flows in previous years - Not discountec
CC ATTACHMENT 2
nnrA�p r- .r
•• �/ .Jl. o.A J
http: / /www .clean- power.com/cec /default. asp 6/6/2003
Cumulative
Year
Net Cash Flow
Net Cash Flow
2003
$ (68)
$ (68)
2004
$ (r 1)
$ (120)
2005
$ (38)
$ (158)
2006
S(23)
$(181)
2007
$ (7)
$ (188)
2008
$8
$(18o)
2009
$24
$(156)
2010
$40
$(116)
2011
$55
$(61)
2012
$71
$10
2013
$87
$98
2014
$103
$201
2015
$120
$321
2016
$136
$457
2017
$152
$609
2018
$168
$777
2019
$184
$961
2020
$200
$1,161
2021
$216
$1,377
2022
$232
$1,609
2023
$247
$1,856
2024
$262
$2,119
2025
$277
$2,396
2026
$292
$2,688
2027
$306
$2,994
2028
$320
$3,314
2029
$333
$3,647
2030
$345
$3,992
2031
$357
$4,350
2032
$368
$4,718
CC ATTACHMENT 2
nnrA�p r- .r
•• �/ .Jl. o.A J
http: / /www .clean- power.com/cec /default. asp 6/6/2003
q; t' y( �° ?•`�
�- KINUTES VO,F aUF—CITY
- °fifisospark, California
ITEM 10, A.
COUNCIL AND PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
March 12, 2003
A Special Joint Meeting of the Moorpark City Council and Parks &
Recreation Commission was held on March 12, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. at
the Moorpark Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Hunter called the City Council to order and Chair
DeGuardi called the Parks and Recreation Commission to order
at 6:40 p.m.
2. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Deborah Traffenstedt,
Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk.
3. ROLL CALL:
City Council: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos,
Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor
Hunter.
Parks & Recreation Commissioners Catrambone, Pflaumer,
Commission: Thompson, Weisberger, and Chair
DeGuardi.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Mary
Lindley, Community Services
Director; Deborah Traffenstedt,
Assistant to City Manager /City
Clerk; and Patty Lemcke,
Administrative Secretary.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
5. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal
Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Consider and
discuss Priorities, Goals and Objectives for FY
2003/2004.
�' :/ -L'J
Minutes of the City Council and
Parks & Recreation Commission
Moorpark, California Page 2 March 12, 2003
Mr. Kueny gave a brief overview of staff's report.
Mayor Hunter inquired as to an approximate cost for the
proposed Arroyo Vista Recreation Center (AVRC) gym
expansion. Mr. Kueny stated that at this time, staff
could not provide accurate cost information, but
originally it was planned to have the expansion of the
gym mirror the existing area at an approximate dollar
amount of $1.5 million. He stated that staff would look
at the cost and report back to Council.
Mr. Kueny stated to the Commission that the Council had
decided at its February 5, 2003, meeting to remove the
second access into AVCP from the top priorities list
because of the cost and the logistics.
Councilmember Parvin inquired as to the status of the
proposed aquatic facility. Mr. Kueny stated that
Council had agreed in 2002, that the City would not
proceed with this project due to the uncertainty
regarding maintenance funding.
Councilmember Parvin suggested that perhaps the
construction of a teen center could be a joint venture
between the City and another private organization.
Councilmember Harper stated that once a new City Hall
has been built, the proposed teen center could possibly
be placed in the existing site of City Hall.
Councilmember Harper stated that he would like to see
the Parks and Recreation Commission review and comment
on the development of the proposed North Park's public
park components.
Mayor Hunter agreed with Councilmember Harper, and Mr.
Kueny stated that arrangements will be made for the
Commission to review the proposed plans for North Park
development prior to the closing of public hearings by
the Planning Commission.
Mayor Hunter stated that some of the objectives listed
in staff's report are general maintenance items and can
��rr � ems! � �, r- ►-1
Minutes of the City Council and
Parks & Recreation Commission
Moorpark, California Paqe 3 March 12, 2003
be accommodated by the upcoming FY 2003/04 budget.
Mayor Hunter requested that each Commissioner state
their top three or four preferred objectives for
consideration by the City Council.
Chair DeGuardi stated that his top objectives are a
Skatepark, a restroom at Glenwood Park, a second access
to AVCP, and a sand volleyball court.
Commissioner Catrambone stated that his top objectives
are the installation of a play lot and a half
basketball court at Villa Campesina Park, and
replacement of the restroom at Campus Park.
Commissioner Pflaumer stated that his top objectives
are the construction of an aquatics facility, a second
access to AVCP, expansion of the gym, and installation
of restrooms and lights at the basketball court at
Glenwood Park.
Mayor Hunter discussed constraints to moving forward
with the aquatics facility and AVCP's second access. He
stated he liked the gym expansion and other existing
park improvement ideas.
Commissioner Thompson stated that her top objectives
are expansion of the gym, a teen center with placement
of the proposed Skatepark at the same location, a
canine park, and online registration for sports,
classes, permits, etc.
Commissioner Weisberger stated that her top objectives
are a teen center, a Skatepark, a canine park, and a
sand volleyball court at AVCP.
The Council discussed the pros and cons of these
objectives with the Commission.
Councilmember Millhouse stated that he agrees with the
expansion of the gym, the proposed Summer Night events,
a Skatepark, a canine park, and teen center.
Councilmember Millhouse explained to the Commission the
reasons why the aquatic facility was put on hold.
Minutes of the City Council and
Parks & Recreation Commission
Moorpark, California Page 4 March 12, 2003
Mayor Hunter stated he agreed that the Commission
should provide input on the plans for the proposed
North Park project. He also stated that he would like
staff to continue to be involved with, and help
accommodate, the Special Olympics events.
Councilmember Mikos stated she did not want to wait for
City Hall expansion for the Skatepark, that she agrees
with the construction of a sand volleyball court, but
is not sure at this time about installation of
basketball court lights at Glenwood Park. She also
stated that she is very much in favor of a trail system
along the Arroyo.
Councilmember Parvin stated that she also would like to
see the City continue to be involved with the Special
Olympics programs and that service organizations should
also be involved.
Commissioner Catrambone asked the Council to consider
approving the projects that would benefit the greatest
number of people and also consider amenities that may
be used for more than one purpose.
Mr. Kueny stated that when staff arranges for an on
site visit to the North Park development, the Parks and
Recreation Commission will be invited.
Minutes of the City Council and
Parks & Recreation Commission
Moorpark, California Page S March 12, 2003
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the City Council and Chair DeGuardi
adjourned the Parks and Recreation Commission at 7:30 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
Quentin DeGuardi, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
Patty Lemcke
Administrative Secretary
C�,3 -1 C0
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California May 28, 2003
A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark
was held on May 28, 2003, in the Community Center of said City
located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m. and
announced that Item 4.A. would be jointly considered with
the Redevelopment Agency Item 4.A.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse,
Parvin, and Mayor Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public
Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community
Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community
Development Director; Cynthia Borchard,
Administrative Services Director; Captain
Richard Diaz, Sheriff's Department; John
Brand, Senior Management Analyst; Mike
Mathews, Senior Management Analyst; Laura
Stringer, Senior Management Analyst; John
Hartnett, Recreation Manager; Johnny Ea,
Budget and Finance Manager; Deborah
Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City
Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City
Clerk.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Item 4.A. on the Redevelopment
Agency agenda was heard concurrently with Item 4.A. on the City
Council agenda.
0 ) -1 GI
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2
Mav 28, 2003
Mr. Kueny announced that the focus of the meeting would be
on the budget with Item 4.B. deferred to June 4, 2003. He
stated that as Priorities, Goals and Objectives
specifically relate to the budget, they would be discussed.
A. Consider Proposed Operating and Capital Improvements
Budgets for the Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff
Recommendation: Discuss proposed budget for Fiscal
Year 2003/2004.
Mr. Kueny gave an overview of the Budget Message
report and summarized the Revenues increase to be flat
with the full benefit of sales tax from the Moorpark
Market Place not materializing until the 2004/2005
fiscal year.
Mayor /Chair Hunter requested a breakdown be shown in
Revenues for parking citations and vehicle tow /storage
charges in the category of Municipal Code Fines.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Gilbert stated that
there are deficits in two Assessment District zones.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Gilbert stated that
landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road median, east of
Spring Street has been deferred, but could be funded
by a loan from the Los Angeles Area of Contribution
(LAAOC) to the Spring /Tierra Rejada Road AOC. Mr.
Kueny stated that the Council may wish to direct staff
to perform this under Objectives. He also suggested
that staff should work with the Ventura County
Transportation Commission on a Transportation
Enhancement Activities Program (TEA) grant to
landscape the freeway off ramps at Tierra Rejada Road.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Mikos, Mr.
Kueny stated that monument signs would not be part of
the TEA grant and can be addressed in the Objectives.
Mr. Riley discussed the Redevelopment Agency repayment
to the County after a 10 year period of deferral; and
the delay in decision - making at the state level for
adoption of the State Budget, which when implemented
could severely affect the Agency budget.
!A 0
it �,� ✓ .:. w
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
Mav 28, 2003
Discussion followed regarding the draft expenditures
budget for: City Council, City Manager, Assistant
City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney,
Administrative Services, Community Development,
Community Services, Public Works, Moorpark Police
Services, and Capital Improvement Projects.
Mr. Kueny stated that the City Council and City
Manager expenditures are basically the same as last
year.
Mr. Riley stated that in the Assistant City Manager
Division the increase in cost is mostly in salary
growth taking into consideration the cost of living
increase.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Mr. Riley stated
that the strategy for day laborers is to bring in
someone who can gain their confidence and discuss
their ideas for the new Human Services Complex to
which they will be relocated. Captain Diaz stated
that Spanish speaking Sergeants have been
communicating with the day laborers who are responding
and cooperating with law enforcement.
Mr. Riley discussed a new category for Special Events
Filming; increased emphasis on Emergency Response
Training; and Demolition Services for the destruction
of certain structures on High Street using
Redevelopment Agency funds.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Riley discussed the
ballot issue cost to restore the Agency's powers to
declare eminent domain.
Mr. Kueny stated that now that the City Clerk's
Department is fully staffed the emphasis will be on
Records Management.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt
discussed the election expense and offsetting revenue
for the potential North Park ballot measure and the
timing for the election.
Mr. Kueny reported that the Administrative Services
Department is close to being fully staffed.
O n . "'.4 (;3
�X-11-L
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4
Mav 28, 2003
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Mr. Riley and Mr.
Hogan discussed the reconfiguration of the Reception
Area. Mr. Hogan reported on access via a countertop
computer in City Hall to various FEMA maps,
topographical information, and site location
footprints and on having the same service available at
the Charles Abbott location.
Ms. Borchard reported on the launch of Phase II of the
Web Site Development with its many enhancements.
A discussion followed regarding the availability of
paperless agendas.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Ms. Borchard stated that the
cost for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Service
is for licensing fees, support costs, and on -going
costs to purchase County data.
Mr. Kueny stated that the vacant Associate Planner
position in the Community Development Department
should be deleted from the budget for a savings of
$68,963.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council /Redevelopment Agency
determined to delete the Community Development Department
Associate Planner position from the budget.
Mr. Kueny discussed the deficit in the Community
Development Fund and a forthcoming report to the
Council on June 4th to discuss the proposed transfers
from other funds to which the Community Development
Department has provided service.
Mr. Hogan discussed changes needed in the Municipal
Code in regard to second dwelling units; the
availability to retrieve Building and Safety records
via Questys electronic imaging and the resulting fee
recovery; and GIS capabilities in regard to geology,
hydrology, and FEMA information.
Mr. Kueny stated that staff will be bringing a report
to the City Council on June 4th to consider funding for
the GIS program.
Mr. Kueny reported that due to the projected downturn
in project development, staff will have more time to
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 5
Mav 28, 2003
spend on development of the General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Element Update rather than using outside
consultants.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Millhouse,
Ms. Lindley responded that the Community Services
Department had been unsuccessful in their efforts to
gain a grant for a security camera at the Metrolink
station. Mr. Kueny stated that staff will continue to
explore the issue of a camera, as well as egress from
the parking lot, and the construction of a block wall.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Ms. Lindley
reported that additional funding for Ventura County
Agency on Aging (VCAAA) in the amount of $40,300 has
been obtained through a grant. She stated that staff
would like to incorporate that amount into the budget
to be used for health related issues for the Senior
Center and installation of benches at the Bocce Ball
Court.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council /Redevelopment Agency
determined to add $40,300 to the General Fund budget for
Senior Center related expenses and benches for the Bocce
Ball Court.
Mr. Kueny reported that Moorpark Country Club Estates
is donating $5,000 to the Recreation Scholarship
Program.
Mr. Kueny stated that both the Engineer's Reports for
Landscaping /Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts
and Parks and Recreation Maintenance /Improvement
Assessment Districts will be on the June 4th agenda.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Ms. Lindley stated
that the stipend for the Emergency Medical Technician
(EMT) is no longer being paid.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council /Redevelopment Agency
determined to eliminate the EMT stipend from the Landscape
& Lighting District Fund.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Captain Diaz stated
he would work with Mr. Gilbert to consider if the
Turbo Flare Kits would work for police cars.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 6
Mav 28, 2003
In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Gilbert stated that
consideration is being given to processing parking
enforcement in -house with an email link directly to
the Department of Motor Vehicles to save on the
contract costs.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated
that two additional radar speed display signs, at a
cost of $10,000 each, could be purchased and placed on
northbound Tierra Rejada Road near Glenwood Park and
on east or westbound Campus Park Drive to curtail
speeding. He also suggested converting one temporary
sign to a permanent sign at another location.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council /Redevelopment Agency
determined to budget for two additional radar speed display
signs.
Mr. Kueny stated that there is a recommendation for
the City to continue to fund 1000 of the D.A.R.E.
Program.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Captain Diaz stated
that the $15,000 allocated for overtime for traffic
enforcement on the 118 freeway is for the Commercial
Enforcement program.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated
that he and Captain Diaz are working on developing a
protocol for training so that there is a clear
understanding of what the Sheriff's Department and
City are each responsible for paying.
Mr. Kueny reported that the Endowment Fund will be
used for the development of the Police Services
Facility and the Public Works Corporate Yard, avoiding
overuse of the Gas Tax Fund.
In response to Mayor /Chair Hunter, Mr. Gilbert stated
that the contract for patch work on Tierra Rejada Road
has been awarded and work should begin within a month.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Mikos'
inquiry regarding High Street monument signs, Mr.
Kueny stated that the Redevelopment Agency staff will
work with Community Development staff to revamp the
Downtown Specific Plan area and to make sure design
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 7
May 28, 2003
improvements are appropriate before proceeding with
construction.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Harper, Mr.
Gilbert stated that the conduit for decorative
lighting along High Street is stubbed out at every
Pepper tree; however it will cost approximately
$10,000 - $30,000 to design a system to bring the power
and related improvements to the trees. Mr. Kueny
recommended delaying this until tree replacement and
life span information is available on the Pepper
trees.
In response to Mr. Kueny, Ms. Lindley stated that a
report on the life span of the Pepper trees located on
High Street will be scheduled as an agenda report.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Parvin,
Mayor Hunter stated that a policy decision has not
been made on locating a dog park at College View Park.
CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council/
Redevelopment Agency to remove the allocation for the
canine park from the Park Improvement Fund and to discuss a
different location when Goals and Objectives are discussed.
Mr. Kueny summarized the changes to the proposed
budget for presentation on June 18th to include: 1)
Cost for issues related to paperless agendas for
Council to be absorbed in the budget; 2) Security
camera, extension of wall, and revised egress at the
Metrolink station to be discussed with Objectives; 3)
Funding for the Bocce Ball shelter to be funded from
the General Fund; 4) Addition of $20,000 for two radar
speed display signs to come from the Gas Tax Fund; 5)
Inclusion of the $40,300 grant as additional funding
for Senior Center expenditures; and 6) Elimination of
$20,000 for the proposed canine park.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Millhouse,
Ms. Lindley stated that an offer has been made to the
landowner adjacent to Poindexter Park in regard to
land acquisition for the development of a Skate Park.
In response to Councilmember /Agency Member Mikos, Ms.
Lindley stated that the Metrolink landscaping is
awaiting Caltrans approval before going out to bid.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Paqe 8
Mav 28, 2003
CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council/
Redevelopment Agency to schedule Budget Adoption for June
18, 2003, with the changes as directed, to be incorporated.
B. Consider Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and
Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Consider the
priorities, goals and objectives with recommended
budget.
CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to defer
this item to the meeting of June 4, 2003.
Councilmember Mikos requested the Council give
consideration to discussing at the June 4th meeting,
the inclusion of improvements to East Los Angeles
Avenue in conjunction with those for West Los Angeles
Avenue.
Mr. Gilbert stated that the Public Works Department is
proceeding on a project to relocate the Calleguas
waterline in front of Nelson Chung's property in order
to move ahead with the improvements to West Los
Angeles Avenue, which will enable staff attention to
then be given to East Los Angeles Avenue.
AT THIS POINT in the meeting the Redevelopment Agency meeting
was adjourned. The time was 9:25 p.m.
5. CLOSED SESSION:
Mr. Kueny announced that the City Council would be going
into closed session for discussion of Items 4.A., 4.B., and
4.C. on the agenda. The time was 9:26 p.m.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Millhouse seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session
for a discussion of Items 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C. on the
agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Administrative Services Director, Assistant
City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk,
Chief of Police, City Attorney, City Engineer, City
Manager, Community Development Director, Community
Services Director, and Public Works Director.
�J -L ON
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 9
Mav 28, 2003
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Employee Organization: Service Employees International
Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998
C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny
Unrepresented employees: Accountant I, Administrative
Services Director, Assistant City Manager, Assistant
to City Manager /City Clerk, Budget and Finance
Manager, Community Development Director, Community
Services Director, Information Systems Manager,
Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Public Works
Director, Recreation Manager, and Senior Management
Analyst.
Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper,
Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny,
City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; and
Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk.
The Council reconvened into open session at 9:43 p.m. Mr.
Kueny stated that Items 4.A. and 4.B. were discussed and
that there was no action to report.
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk
(11C!�)l G9
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Moorpark, California
June 4, 2003
A Special Joint Meeting of the Moorpark City Council and
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark was held on June
4, 2003, at 6:23 p.m. at the Moorpark Community Center located
at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor /Chair Hunter called the City Council and
Redevelopment Agency meeting to order at 6:23 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers /Agency Members Harper, Mikos,
Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor /Chair Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive
Director; Joseph Montes, City Attorney/
General Counsel; Hugh Riley, Assistant City
Manager /Assistant Executive Director; Ken
Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary
Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry
Hogan, Community Development Director; and
Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk /Agency
Secretary.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRESENTATION /ACTION/
DISCUSSION:
A. Consider City Authority to Act as Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency Agent with Respect to Management
of Agency Property. Staff Recommendation: Reaffirm
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Board authorization to
the City for management of Agency Property.
Mr. Kueny gave the staff report.
MOTION: Councilmember /Agency Member Mikos moved and
Councilmember /Agency Member Harper seconded a motion to
reaffirm by minute action the Moorpark Redevelopment
Minutes of the City Council
and Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2 June 4, 2003
Agency Board's authorization to the City for management of
Agency property. The motion carried by unanimous voice
vote.
5. CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CLOSED SESSION:
Mr. Kueny recommended that the Council /Agency go into
closed session for a discussion of Item S.A.
MOTION: Councilmember /Agency Member Millhouse moved and
Councilmember /Agency Member Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn
to closed session for a discussion of Item S.A. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
City of Moorpark vs. Peter Gillette
(Case No. SC036059)
Present in closed session were Councilmembers /Agency
Members Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor /Chair
Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director;
Joseph Montes, City Attorney /General Counsel; Hugh Riley,
Assistant City Manager /Assistant Executive Director; Ken
Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community
Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development
Director; and Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk /Agency
Secretary.
The Agency reconvened into open session at 6:34 p.m. Mr.
Kueny announced that Item S.A. was discussed in closed
session and that there was no action to report.
6. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
None was held.
. .L. 4 _ -
Minutes of the City Council
and Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 3 June 4, 2003
7. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor /Chair Hunter adjourned the City Council and
Redevelopment Agency meeting at 6:34 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor and Chair
of Redevelopment Agency
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
City Clerk and Agency Secretary
ITEM I U • •
CITY OF MOORPARK
WARRANT REGISTER
FOR THE 2002 -2003 FISCAL YEAR
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2003
MANUAL
WARRANTS
VOIDED
WARRANTS
PAYROLL LIABILITY
WARRANTS
REGULAR
WARRANTS
TOTAL
SEQUENCE AMOUNT
From To
112723 - 112724 & $ 325.00
112985 - 112988 $ 45,124.43
110948 & 111128 & $ (265.00)
111156 & 111346 &
112986
112980 - 112984 $ 2,556.74
112989 - 113093 & $ 25,423.70
113094 - 113129 $ 876,235.27
43
06/10/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
11/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
100076107619
9103
EDDIE GRANT SHOW
M
05/07/03
1101
0.00
M050703
5 /9SR CTR EVENT ENTE
20
50903
05/07/03
112724
0.00
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP CHECK AMT
TOTAL SENIOR CENTER TRUST EXP NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE
�s
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 14:50:56
PAGE 1
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
04/30/03 75.00
0.00 75.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
06/10/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 11/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 6000
- FIDUCIARY -
GENERAL DEPOS
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
6000
2609
WILLIAMS, SEAN
N
05/07/03
1101
0.00
M050703
REIMBURSE FILMING
DE 20
R# 30857
05/07/03
112723
0.00
TOTAL FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS CHECK AMT
TOTAL FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS CHECK AMT
TOTAL FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
ko
c
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 14:50:56
PAGE 2
DISC DATE CHECK AMT
DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
04/08/03 250.00
0.00 250.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
250.00
250.00
250.00
250.00
325.00
325.00
06/10/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
06/04/03
1101
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
04/25/03
FUND - 1000 -
GENERAL FUND
0.00
0.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
0.00
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
100031100000
9122
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0098- 3 /03HR /PE
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE
100041000000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01359 - 0001- 3 /03RETAI 20 93377
100041000000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01536 - 0001- 3 /03CEO 20 93225
100041000000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01359 - 0102- 3 /03COMM 20 93377
100041000000 9121 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01359- 0001- 3 /03RETAI 20 93376
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY CHECK AMT
TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY NET PAYABLE
100071000000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01359- 0103- 3 /03COMM 20 93376
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE
100081000000 9122 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO N
M060403 01359 - 0105- 3 /03PW 20 93376
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS CHECK AMT
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE
c RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:49
PAGE 1
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 04/25/03 500.00
0.00 0.00 500.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
06/04/03 1101 0.00 04/25/03
06/04/03 112987 0.00 0.00
06/04/03 1101 0.00 04/25/03
06/04/03 112987 0.00 0.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
500.00
500.00
24.86
24.86
62.00
62.00
1846.95
1846.95
572.05
572.05
2505.86
2505.86
2505.86
2505.86
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
3115.86
3115.86
06/10/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2200 -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
2200
3803
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
-2.55
M060403
01359 - 0001- 3 /03EQUIL
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
-2.55
2200
3803
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
-35.70
M060403
01359 - 0102- 3 /03ADMIN
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
-35.70
2200
3803
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
- 1250.40
M060403
01359 - 0157- 3 /03NRTH
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
- 1250.40
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
- 1288.65
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
- 1288.65
TOTAL COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
- 1288.65
TOTAL COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
- 1288.65
220064300000
9122
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
484.59
M060403
01536 - 0001- 3 /03CEO
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
484.59
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
810.00
M060403
01536 - 0148- 3 /03HORST
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
810.00
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
909.99
M060403
01536- 0147- 3 /03BERMU
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
909.99
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
117.85
M060403
01536 - 0146- 3 /03MACNF
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
117.85
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
560.00
M060403
01536- 0001- 3 /03CEO
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
560.00
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
129.25
M060403
01536 - 0149- 3 /03ANAYA
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
129.25
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
897.21
M060403
01536 - 0038- 3 /03KRIEG
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
897.21
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
441.77
M060403
01536 - 0041- 3 /03GARCI
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
441.77
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
1286.67
M060403
01536 - 0039- 3 /03NAVAR
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
1286.67
220064300000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
808.42
M060403
01536- 0040- 3 /03LUCAS
20
93225
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
808.42
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
6445.75
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
6445.75
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT
6445.75
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE
6445.75
TOUL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
s
5157.10
RUN
DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
s�
06/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
5157.10
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO
290124202001 9285 STEVE ABBATH, JR. & N 06/04/03 1101
M060403 RELOCATION MOVING EX 20 MOVING EXP 06/04/03 112985
290124202001 9285 TITAN ESCROW COMPANY N
M060403 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 20 SPACE 020
290124202001 9285 TITAN ESCROW COMPANY N
M060403 RENTAL ASSISTANT PYM 20 SPACE #20
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE
�y
(a
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50
PAGE 4
SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT
USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE
0.00 06/04/03 1550.00
0.00 0.00 1550.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
06/04/03
10900.00
06/04/03
112988
0.00
0.00
10900.00
06/04/03
1101
0.00
06/04/03
5904.78
06/04/03
112988
0.00
0.00
5904.78
16804.78
16804.78
18354.78
18354.78
18354.78
18354.78
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/10/03
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
7727.70
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
7727.70
FUND - 2902 -
MRA AREA 1 -INCR
& OTHER
0.00
0.00
100.95
0.00
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
0.00
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
700.00
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
290224100000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0145- 3 /03MISSI
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
290224100000
9121
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0001- 3 /03RETAI
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
290224100000
9121
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0001- 3 /03RETAI
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
290224100000
9123
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359- 0145- 3 /03MISSI
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
290224102007
9122
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359- 0153- 3 /03CIVIC
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX CHECK AMT
TOTAL CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX NET PAYABLE
TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT
TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCA & OTHER NET PAYABLE
p i
\ r
r RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50
4r/
PAGE 5
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
04/25/03
7727.70
0.00
0.00
7727.70
0.00
04/25/03
100.95
0.00
0.00
100.95
0.00
04/25/03
4.39
0.00
0.00
4.39
0.00
04/25/03
700.00
0.00
0.00
700.00
8533.04
8533.04
8533.04
8533.04
0.00
04/25/03
84.00
0.00
0.00
84.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
84.00
84.00
8617.04
8617.04
06/10/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 6399 - TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER RESI
BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
6399 2734
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
21.00
M060403
01359 - 0102- 3 /03TOLL
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
21.00
6399 2754
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
0.00
04/25/03
140.00
M060403
01359- 0102- 3 /03TOLL
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
0.00
0.00
140.00
TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT
161.00
TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE
161.00
TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER
RESI CHECK AMT
161.00
TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER
RESI NET PAYABLE
161.00
TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER
RESI CHECK AMT
161.00
TOTAL TOLL BROS /BOLLINGER
RESI NET PAYABLE
161.00
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
CO
06/10/03
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
NET PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/02
14.70
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
14.70
FUND -
6480 - M &M DEVELOPMENT
98.00
0.00
0.00
98.00
BUDGET
UNIT ACCOUNT
VENDOR 1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
6480
2734
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0102- 3 /03M &M D
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
6480
2754
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0102- 3 /03M &M D
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL
VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL
VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL
M &M DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL
M &M DEVELOPMENT NET
PAYABLE
TOTAL
M &M DEVELOPMENT CHECK
AMT
TOTAL
M &M DEVELOPMENT NET
PAYABLE
tom**
td
\r
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50
PAGE 7
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
04/25/03
14.70
0.00
0.00
14.70
0.00
04/25/03
98.00
0.00
0.00
98.00
112.70
112.70
112.70
112.70
112.70
112.70
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/10/03
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
0.00
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
1250.40
0.00
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
1250.40
FUND - 6534
- NORTH PARK
VILLAGE
0.00
0.00
8336.00
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
9586.40
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
6534
2734
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359 - 0157- 3 /03NRTH
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
6534
2754
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403
01359- 0157- 3 /03NRTH
20
93377
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL VENDOR
CHECK AMT
TOTAL VENDOR
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL NORTH
PARK VILLAGE
CHECK AMT
TOTAL NORTH
PARK VILLAGE
NET PAYABLE
TOTAL NORTH
PARK VILLAGE
CHECK AMT
TOTAL NORTH
PARK VILLAGE
NET PAYABLE
r
I 'a
r) RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:50
U
PAGE 8
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
04/25/03
1250.40
0.00
0.00
1250.40
0.00
04/25/03
8336.00
0.00
0.00
8336.00
9586.40
9586.40
9586.40
9586.40
9586.40
9586.40
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
06/10/03
DISC DATE
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
DISC AMT
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/02
04/25/03
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
0.00
FUND -
6911 - EQUILON PIPELINE
0.00
04/25/03
2.55
0.00
BUDGET
UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
6911
2754 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403 01359 - 0001- 3 /03EQUIL
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
6911
2734 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
N
06/04/03
1101
M060403 01359 - 0001- 3 /03EQUIL
20
93376
06/04/03
112987
TOTAL
VENDOR CHECK AMT
TOTAL
VENDOR NET PAYABLE
TOTAL
EQUILON PIPELINE CHECK AMT
TOTAL
EQUILON PIPELINE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL
EQUILON PIPELINE CHECK AMT
TOTAL
EQUILON PIPELINE NET PAYABLE
TOTAL
REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL
REPORT NET PAYABLE
k.v
c"
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 15:30:51
PAGE 9
SALES TAX
DISC DATE
CHECK AMT
USE TAX
DISC AMT
NET PAYABLE
0.00
04/25/03
17.00
0.00
0.00
17.00
0.00
04/25/03
2.55
0.00
0.00
2.55
19.55
19.55
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
19.55
19.55
19.55
19.55
45124.43
45124.43
06/10/03
CITY
OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD: 12/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 1000
- GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE
ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE
CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
1000
3301
OTERO, JOSE E.
N
06/10/03
1101
AP111302
REFUND -CIT #165228
20
R# 29618
11/13/02
111156 V
1000 3301 DURAN'S EGGS, INC. N 06/10/03
AP121102 REFUND - OVERPAYMENT 20 CIT #166541 12/11/02
TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE
kv
C
b 1
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 13:56:59
SALES TAX DISC DATE
USE TAX DISC AMT
0.00 11/01/02
0.00 0.00
1101 0.00 11/20/02
111346 V 0.00 0.00
PAGE 1
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
-40.00
-40.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
-5.00
-5.00
-45.00
-45.00
-45.00
-45.00
06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/02
MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY
FUND - 2200 -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BUDGET UNIT
ACCOUNT
VENDOR
1099
PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM
CASH ACCT
CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
T/C
INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT
CHECK NO
220061000000
9001
DICECCO, MARK
M
06/10/03
1101
AP103002
9 /9COMPENSATION
MTG 20
SEPTEMBER 02 10/30/02
110948 V
220061000000 9223 HOGAN, BARRY K. N 06/10/03
AP111302 REIMB -GOLF TOURNAMEN 20 B &G TOURNEY 11/13/02
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE
TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT
TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE
1
C i
RUN DATE 06/10/03 TIME 13:56:59
SALES TAX DISC DATE
USE TAX DISC AMT
0.00 10/22/02
0.00 0.00
1101 0.00 10/30/02
111128 V 0.00 0.00
PAGE 2
CHECK AMT
NET PAYABLE
- 100.00
- 100.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
- 120.00
- 120.00
- 220.00
- 220.00
- 220.00
- 220.00
- 265.00
- 265.00
PENTAMATION
- FUND
ACCOUNTING
DATE: 06/04/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
TIME: 10:16:43
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 -
GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH
ACCT DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - --- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
112980
1101
06/06/03
2335
AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN
2299
112981
1101
06/06/03
1888
S E I U LOCAL 998
2208
112982
1101
06/06/03
1891
SANDRA KUENY
2299
112983
1101
06/06/03
1889
UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU
2207
112984
1101
06/06/03
1890
VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A
2299
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL
REPORT
�s
1
------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
CANCER INSURANCE
UNION DUES
CASE #SD020444
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION
ID #9600616061
PAGE NUMBER: 1
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
AMOUNT
134.82
381.46
1,693.00
179.00
168.46
2,556.74
2,556.74
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 06/04/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21
TIME: 10:16:48 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND FUND TITLE
1000 GENERAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
f �
�s
c
AMOUNT
2,556.74
2.556.74
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE NUMBER:
1
DATE: 06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
VENCHK21
TIME: 16:27:26
CHECK REGISTER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
12/02
FUND
- 1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - -
-- AMOUNT
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03CHUDOBA CELLPHONE
10.82
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5/03H RILEY CELLPHONE
23.83
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03KUENY CELLPHONE
33.30
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03LINDLEY CELLPHONE
24.48
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03TRAFFENSTEDT CELL
11.08
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03HUNTER CELLPHONE
56.00
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03HOGAN CELLPHONE
11.74
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03BORCHARD CELLPHON
34.67
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03MPK PD CELLPHONES
464.93
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03M RILEY CELLPHONE
16.15
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03JOHNSTON CELLPHON
17.83
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03PARKS CELLPHONE
16.15
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03GIL13ERT CELLPHONE
14.97
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03AVRC CELLPHONE
10.95
112989
1101
06/11/03
1003
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
9424
5 /03MORGENSTERN CELLP
23.23
TOTAL
CHECK
770.13
112990
1101
06/11/03
1007
ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC
9420
6/03 FAX,ANSWERING SR
64.90
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9208
WELDING ACETYLENE
33.79
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
TR PRK TRASH ENCLOSUR
19.44
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
MTN MEADOWS PRK TRASH
19.43
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
CMPS PRK TRASH ENCLOS
19.43
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
TR PRK GATE MAINT
9.61
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
CMPS PRK GATE MAINT
9.62
112991
1101
06/11/03
1011
ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
9252
MTN MEADOWS PRK GATE
9.62
TOTAL
CHECK
120.94
112992
1101
06/11/03
1012
ACCURATE WELDING
9303
PW WELDING STEEL
16.09
112992
1101
06/11/03
1012
ACCURATE WELDING
9303
FEEDBACK POLE WELDING
64.35
TOTAL
CHECK
80.44
112993
1101
06/11/03
1804
ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTIT
9220
SPRING /SUMMER 03 RECO
38.25
112994
1101
06/11/03
1025
ALL -AIRE HEATING & AIR CO
9103
PW BLDG A/C REPAIR
136.00
112995
1101
06/11/03
3079
AMERA -CHEM, INC.
9220
03 DRUG ID BIBLE
39.95
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03MRA PAGER
4.57
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5/03C COUNCIL PAGERS
46.18
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03COM FAC PAGER
5.53
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03PW PAGERS
16.12
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03AVRC PAGER
11.11
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03PRKS PAGER
9.14
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03PRKNG ENF PAGER
5.53
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5/03C MGR PAGERS
31.81
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03EMERGENCY SRV PAG
4.10
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03C CLERK PAGER
6.02
112996
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03COMM DEV PAGER
6.01
112996
s
1101
06/11/03
2697
ARCH WIRELESS
9420
5 /03COM SRVCS PAGER
6.02
TOTAL
CHECK
152.14
112997
r�
;
1101
06/11/03
3594
BELLISSIMO, DEPUTY ANTHON
9225
SRO TRAINING PER DIEM
252.00
Ph
112998
eJ
1101
06/11/03
1058
BEST ELECTRIC
9103
FOUNTAIN SUBMETER
790.00
PAGE NUMBER: 2
PENTAMATION
-
FUND ACCOUNTING
DATE: 06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
VENCHK21
TIME: 16:27:26
CHECK REGISTER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND -
1000
- GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
-- - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - -
-- AMOUNT
112999
1101
06/11/03
1067
BOGOYEVAC, PETE
9244
ADLT SOFTBALL FORFEIT
20.00
112999
1101
06/11/03
1067
BOGOYEVAC, PETE
9244
ADLT SOFTBALL UMPIRE
199.50
TOTAL
CHECK
219.50
113000
1101
06/11/03
3590
BOLANOS, TERESA
2606
REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS
75.00
113001
1101
06/11/03
3026
BONE HEALTH
9103
6 /20BONE DENSITY SCRE
400.00
113002
1101
06/11/03
2414
BRANDCO BILLING
9254
TRUCK #4 OIL CHANGE
31.04
113003
1101
06/11/03
2421
C.A.C.E.
9221
03/04 MEMBERSHIP DUES
40.00
113004
1101
06/11/03
1670
C.R.R.A.
9221
03 MEMBERSHIP DUES
81.00
113005
1101
06/11/03
3249
CASSC
9221
03/04 MEMBERSHIP
25.00
113006
1101
06/11/03
1121
CHEMSEARCH
9304
PW SAFETY SUITS
234.69
113006
1101
06/11/03
1121
CHEMSEARCH
9208
PW ABSORBANT
170.94
TOTAL
CHECK
405.63
113007
1101
06/11/03
3178
COMPLETE PROPERTY MAINTEN
9102
6 /03FOUNTAIN MAINT
200.00
113008
1101
06/11/03
2702
CORBIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
9223
7/14 -7/18 SRO TRAININ
385.00
113009
1101
06/11/03
1582
CAMERON R TORKAY
9244
AFTER DARK DEEJAY SRV
395.00
113010
1101
06/11/03
3485
CSMFO
9223
SALES & PROPERTY TAX
18.00
113011
1101
06/11/03
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9244
OVERNIGHT SECURITY FOR
AP 319.20
113011
1101
06/11/03
1179
DIAL SECURITY
9102
5 /12- 16METROLINK GUAR
598.00
TOTAL
CHECK
917.20
113012
1101
06/11/03
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
9/9 COMP MTG
100.00
113012
1101
06/11/03
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
4/1 COMP MTG
100.00
113012
1101
06/11/03
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
3/4 COMP MTG
100.00
113012
1101
06/11/03
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
2/4 & 2/18 COMP MTGS
200.00
113012
1101
06/11/03
1181
DICECCO, MARK
9001
5/17 & 5/20 COMP MTGS
200.00
TOTAL
CHECK
-
700.00
113013
1101
06/11/03
1186
DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR
9251
#11 SPRAY RIG EQUIP
105.04
113014
1101
06/11/03
3040
DNA ELECTRIC
9103
YARD - MOTION LIGHTS IN
423.50
113014
1101
06/11/03
3040
DNA ELECTRIC
9103
YARD - MOTION LIGHTS IN
423.50
TOTAL
CHECK
847.00
113015
1101
06/11/03
1690
DOYLE SHAW ICE
9204
VECTOR DRY ICE
16.00
113016
1101
06/11/03
1219
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
9230
JPIA SAFETY VIDEO RTN
7.56
113017
o!
1101
06/11/03
1220
FENCE FACTORY RENTALS
9252
FIRE STATION SITE FEN
400.00
113018
4.i
1101
06/11/03
1222
FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS
9020
CEO UNIFORM CLEANING
16.55
�((
113019
1101
06/11/03
3508
GUERRERO, JOSE & ELISA
9413
UTILITIES OWED
- 262.38
113019
1101
06/11/03
3508
GUERRERO, JOSE & ELISA
2614
SECURITY DEPOSIT
280.00
TOTAL
CHECK
17.62
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
DATE: 06/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
TIME: 16:27:26 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - -- -- VENDOR-------- - - - --- ACCT
PAGE NUMBER: 3
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
113020
1101
06/11/03
1259
HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE
9244
APRICOT FESTIVAL
261.50
113020
1101
06/11/03
1259
HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE
9244
EASTER EGG HUNT
100.00
113020
1101
06/11/03
1259
HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE
9244
CAMP MOORPARK
100.00
1101
06/11/03
1259
HAPPENINGS MAGAZINE
9244
FIREWORKS EXTRAVAGANZ
6.50
113020
468.00
TOTAL
CHECK
113021
1101
06/11/03
3427
HERRERA, RAMIRO & MARIA
2614
SECURITY DEPOSIT
287.84
1101
06/11/03
3427
HERRERA, RAMIRO & MARIA
9413
UTILITIES OWED
-51.48
113021
236.36
TOTAL
CHECK
113022
1101
06/11/03
3584
HESS, MARGIE
3850
REFUND -PRK RESERVATIO
40.00
113023
1101
06/11/03
3306
HOGAN, BARRY K.
9223
REIMB -GOLF TOURNAMENT
120.00
113024
1101
06/11/03
1286
HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY
9204
COM FAC CLEANING SUPP
472.17
113025
1101
06/11/03
1305
J E CLARK II CORPORATION
9255
PARKS FUEL
23.60
113026
1101
06/11/03
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
6 /03PW BLDG JANITORIA
180.00
113027
1101
06/11/03
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
LAURELHURST S/W
131.38
113027
1101
06/11/03
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
REEDLEY S/W
105.11
113027
1101
06/11/03
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
HEARON DR S/W
105.11
1101
06/11/03
2878
KWIK KART READY MIX, INC.
9310
CHESTERFIELD S/W
78.83
113027
420.43
TOTAL
CHECK
113028
1101
06/11/03
1326
L.A. LAWNMOWER
9251
REPAIR STIHL HL 73
48.41
113029
1101
06/11/03
3595
LA QUINTA INN
9225
7/13 -7/18 LODGING
462.00
113030
1101
06/11/03
1329
LANDIS, KIPP A
9001
4/1 COMP MTG
100.00
113030
1101
06/11/03
1329
LANDIS, KIPP A
9001
3/4 COMP MTG
100.00
113030
1101
06/11/03
1329
LANDIS, KIPP A
9001
5/17 & 5/20 COMP MTG
200.00
1101
06/11/03
1329
LANDIS, KIPP A
9001
2/4 & 2/18 COMP MTGS
200.00
113030
600.00
TOTAL
CHECK
113031
1101
06/11/03
3440
LAULETTA, DAVID
9001
5/17 & 5820 COMP MTGS
200.00
113031
1101
06/11/03
3440
LAULETTA, DAVID
9001
3 /03COMP MTG
100.00
113031
1101
06/11/03
3440
LAULETTA, DAVID
9001
4/1 COMP MTG
100.00
1101
06/11/03
3440
LAULETTA, DAVID
9001
2/4 & 2/18 COMP MTGS
200.00
113031
600.00
TOTAL
CHECK
113032
1101
06/11/03
1333
LBL EQUIPMENT REPAIR INC
9254
TRUCK #5 HYDRAULICS
172.65
113033
1101
06/11/03
2157
LISTER PARTY RENTALS
9244
STAGE RENTAL FOR APRICOT
369.30
113034
1101
06/11/03
3585
LORIA, MICHAEL
3862
REFUND - BEATTLES SONGS
40.00
113035
`.ti
1101
06/11/03
2004
M & N INTERNATIONAL
9205
FREIGHT
32.63
(
1101
06/11/03
2004
M & N INTERNATIONAL
9205
EVENT SUPPLIES FOR SENIOR
326.33
113035
358.96
s
TOTAL
CHECK
113036
1101
06/11/03
1360
MASUNE INC.
9244
FREIGHT
3.15
113036
1101
06/11/03
1360
MASUNE INC.
9244
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES
110.25
113036.;
1101
06/11/03
1360
MASUNE INC.
9244
FREIGHT
5.80
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
179.05
DATE: 06/10/03
LAB MICROSCOPE MAINT
85.00
PRKS & CH ADVIL
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
TIME: 16:27:26
1.58
REFUND- GUITAR CLASS
CHECK REGISTER
FUND
- 1000
- GENERAL
FUND
630.00
PRE -CONF REGISTRATION
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
113036
1101
06/11/03
1360
MASUNE INC.
9244
5 /03PW ST OIL CHANGES
TOTAL
CHECK
5 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS
4.00
113037
5.20
1101
06/11/03
1363
MCBAIN
9251
113038
1101
06/11/03
1366
MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY
9205
113039
1101
06/11/03
3453
MEREDITH, HERBERT
3404
113040
125.00
1101
06/11/03
2190
MEYER, PAM
3862
113041
1101
06/11/03
3589
MEZA, JAVIER
2606
113042
1101
06/11/03
3193
MIKE HINOJOSA CONSTRUCTIO
9102
113043
70.20
1101
06/11/03
1912
MMASC
9223
113043
1101
06/11/03
1912
MMASC
9223
REFUND - BABYSITTING BA
TOTAL
CHECK
VECTOR TRUCK SEAT COV
103.98
113044
10.17
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
113044
1101
06/11/03
1376
MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE
9254
TOTAL
CHECK
113045
1101
06/11/03
1750
MOBILE MINI, INC.
9103
113046
1101
06/11/03
2918
MONSTERTRAK.COM
9236
113046
1101
06/11/03
2918
MONSTERTRAK.COM
9236
TOTAL
CHECK
113047
1101
06/11/03
1382
MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE
9232
113047
1101
06/11/03
1382
MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE
9232
TOTAL
CHECK
113048
1101
06/11/03
1387
MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY
9204
113049
1101
06/11/03
1390
MOORPARK STAR
9220
113050
1101
06/11/03
1403
MVCAC- SOUTHERN REGION
9222
113051
1101
06/11/03
3509
NAVARRO, LIONICIO
2614
113051
1101
06/11/03
3509
NAVARRO, LIONICIO
9413
TOTAL
CHECK
�
4d
113052
�'�
1101
06/11/03
3588
NELSON, KATHLEEN
3862
113053
���
1101
06/11/03
1417
NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS
9254
113053
t��-
1101
06/11/03
1417
NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS
9254
f
TOTAL
CHECK
5
PAGE NUMBER: 4
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
- -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES
59.85
179.05
LAB MICROSCOPE MAINT
85.00
PRKS & CH ADVIL
31.30
RENT & UTILITY OVERPY
1.58
REFUND- GUITAR CLASS
40.00
REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS
75.00
AVRC KITCHEN CABINETS
630.00
PRE -CONF REGISTRATION
75.00
6/18- EMERGENCY PREPAR
20.00
95.00
5 /03PW ADMIN CAR WASH
21.00
5 /03VECTOR CAR WASH
8.00
5 /03PW ST OIL CHANGES
92.44
5 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS
4.00
5 /03PARKS CAR WASH
5.20
5 /03AVRC CAR WASH
7.80
5 /03LANDS,LIGHT CAR W
2.00
5/03X- GUARDS CAR WASH
4.00
5 /03MPK PD CAR WASH
200.00
344.44
5/28- 6 /24AVRC MINI BI
137.28
ACCT TECHNICIAN I /II
125.00
CAMP MPK ADMIN AIDE
250.00
375.00
BUS FLYER & SIGN DECA
142.54
FLYER FILM PRINT NEGA
64.35
206.89
VECTOR LAY MASH
9.35
26 WK SUB -SR CTR
70.20
5/27 -28 CYCLE #7 TRAI
35.00
SECURITY DEPOSIT
510.00
UTILITIES OWED
- 259.49
250.51
REFUND - BABYSITTING BA
30.00
VECTOR TRUCK SEAT COV
103.98
CAR MAINT SUPPLIES
10.17
114.15
PAGE NUMBER: 5
PENTAMATION
- FUND ACCOUNTING
VENCHK21
DATE: 06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
TIME: 16:27:26
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
113054
1101
06/11/03
2724
OAKBROOK ENGRAVING & AWAR
9205
PDU PLAQUE & ENGRAVIN
560.17
113055
1101
06/11/03
2486
OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPAN
9102
TITLE POLICY -FIRE STA
375.00
113056
1101
06/11/03
1423
ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY
9244
FREIGHT
19.44
1101
06/11/03
1423
ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY
9244
TEEN EVENT SUPPLIES FOR
L 243.03
113056
262.47
TOTAL
CHECK
113057
1101
06/11/03
1424
ORKIN EXTERMINATING
9103
5 /03AVRC PEST CONTROL
176.55
113058
1101
06/11/03
3579
OSBORN, MARY
3862
REFUND- TENNIS CLASS
40.00
113059
1101
06/11/03
3359
OTERO, JOSE E.
3301
REFUND -CIT PD TWICE
40.00
113060
1101
06/11/03
1429
PACIFIC SWEEP
9352
5 /03METROLINK SWEEPIN
550.75
113061
1101
06/11/03
1437
PEACH HILL SOILS
9310
MISC SIDEWALK REPAIRS
37.80
113062
1101
06/11/03
3439
PESKAY, ROBERT
9001
2/4 & 2/18 COMP MTGS
200.00
113062
1101
06/11/03
3439
PESKAY, ROBERT
9001
4/1 COMP MTG
100.00
113062
1101
06/11/03
3439
PESKAY, ROBERT
9001
5/17 & 5/20 COMP MTGS
200.00
113062
1101
06/11/03
3439
PESKAY, ROBERT
9001
3/4 COMP MTG
100.00
600.00
TOTAL
CHECK
113063
1101
06/11/03
3253
PHILLIPS, DON
3404
RENT.UTILITY OVERPAYM
218.42
113064
1101
06/11/03
1446
PIONEER OFFICE MACHINES
9250
XEROX PRINTER SRVCD
668.06
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9205
PFLAUMER BUSINESS CAR
54.70
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
KROES BUSINESS CARDS
54.70
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
WILLIAMS BUSINESS CAR
54.70
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
J FISS BUSINESS CARDS
54.70
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9232
5 /21CC MTG AGENDA PAC
178.14
113065
1101
06/11/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9205
WEISBURGER BUSINESS C
54.70
451.64
TOTAL
CHECK
113066
1101
06/11/03
3441
POZZA, SCOTT
9001
3/4 COMP MTG
100.00
113066
1101
06/11/03
3441
POZZA, SCOTT
9001
4/1 COMP MTG
100.00
113066
1101
06/11/03
3441
POZZA, SCOTT
9001
5/17 & 5/20 COMP MTGS
200.00
113066
1101
06/11/03
3441
POZZA, SCOTT
9001
2/4 & 2/18 COMP MTGS
200.00
600.00
TOTAL
CHECK
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES
20.48
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
PARKS UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
PW UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
PARKS UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
PW UNIFORM MAINT
18.12
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT
21.72
113067
`.� 1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9020
VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT
21.72
113067
( 1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES
36.95
113067
1101
06/11/03
1464
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
9204
COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE
64.20
TOTAL
CHECK
273'79
113068
��,� 1101
06/11/03
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9205
CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES
70.48
PENTAMATION
- FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
VENCHK21
TIME: 16:27:26
CHECK REGISTER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND -
1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - -
- -- AMOUNT
113068
1101
06/11/03
3022
RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
9205
CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES
16.85
TOTAL
CHECK
87.33
113069
1101
06/11/03
2973
REED, DORENE
3865
REFUND - BASKETBALL LEA
56.00
113069
1101
06/11/03
2973
REED, DORENE
3865
ADMIN FEE
-10.00
TOTAL
CHECK
46.00
113070
1101
06/11/03
3592
ROSALES, MIGUEL
2606
REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS
100.00
113071
1101
06/11/03
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
6- 9 /03PW BLDG
150.00
113071
1101
06/11/03
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
6- 9 /03AVRC SECURITY
330.00
113071
1101
06/11/03
2844
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
9102
6- 9 /03CH ANNEX
180.00
TOTAL
CHECK
660.00
113072
1101
06/11/03
3591
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE
9220
NEW CITIZENS GUIDE
3.50
113073
1101
06/11/03
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
2 /03SIGNAL REPAIRS
577.13
113074
1101
06/11/03
1520
SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY
9204
MPK PD LOCKSET REPAIR
102.50
113075
1101
06/11/03
1527
SMART & FINAL
9208
AVRC SUPPLIES
10.67
113075
1101
06/11/03
1527
SMART & FINAL
9223
AVRC SUPPLIES
89.74
113075
1101
06/11/03
1527
SMART & FINAL
9208
AVRC ICE SHAVER
685.33
TOTAL
CHECK
785.74
113076
1101
06/11/03
2423
SMITH, BRENDA LEE
3862
REFUND - BABYSITTING BA
30.00
113077
1101
06/11/03
1552
STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL
9201
COPIER TONER SUPPLIES
407.55
113078
1101
06/11/03
3587
STUCKEY, VALERIE
3862
REFUND - BABYSITTING BA
30.00
113079
1101
06/11/03
3361
TAYLOR, JANE RUTH
9102
5 /03SR STRENGTH TRAIN
111.00
113079
1101
06/11/03
3361
TAYLOR, JANE RUTH
9103
5 /03SR BEG EXERCISE
138.75
TOTAL
CHECK
249.75
113080
1101
06/11/03
1566
TELCOM INC
9251
MOTOROLA RADIO BATTER
76.93
113081
1101
06/11/03
1568
TERRA FIRMA ENTERPRISES
9103
SEMS SECTIONAL TRAINI
160.00
113082
1101
06/11/03
2430
TOYOTA TONNE OF SIMI VALL
9254
CAR #31 OIL CHANGE
25.94
113083
1101
06/11/03
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9240
20TH ANNIV MUGS
232.91
113083
1101
06/11/03
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9244
PLAQUE ENGRAVING
5.90
113083
1101
06/11/03
1591
TROPHIES ETC
9331
PLAQUE ENGRAVING
5.90
TOTAL
CHECK
244.71
113084
1101
06/11/03
1593
U.S. POSTMASTER
9231
7 /03SR CTR NEWSLETTER
280.00
113085
1101
06/11/03
1696
UC RIVERSIDE EXTENSION
9222
CASILLAS,CEJA- TREE,TU
288.00
113086
1101
06/11/03
1596
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
9102
UNDERGROUND MILEAGE
350.00
113087
1101
06/11/03
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9630
AV SPORTS FIELD COPIE
8.04
113087
!!��'�
FL� 1101
06/11/03
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9601
LA AVE & SHASTA SIGNA
4.02
113087
` 1101
06/11/03
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9601
LA AVE & SHASTA SIGNA
4.02
113087
1101
06/11/03
1599
UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS,
9234
PARCEL MAP LDM 93 -1
8.04
PENTAMATION
- FUND ACCOUNTING
DATE: 06/10/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
TIME: 16:27:26
CHECK REGISTER
FUND -
1000 - GENERAL
FUND
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - -- -- VENDOR--------
- - -- --
ACCT
TOTAL
CHECK
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
113088
1101
06/11/03
1159
VENTURA COUNTY MAIL
#1100
9251
TOTAL
CHECK
113089
1101
06/11/03
2097
VENTURA COUNTY, GSA
FLEET
9254
113090
1101
06/11/03
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9204
113090
1101
06/11/03
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9252
113090
1101
06/11/03
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
113090
1101
06/11/03
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
113090
1101
06/11/03
1636
WHITAKER HARDWARE,
INC
9208
TOTAL
CHECK
113091
1101
06/11/03
2670
WITT, JANET
3862
113092
1101
06/11/03
2843
WOLCO
9203
113092
1101
06/11/03
2843
WOLCO
9203
113092
1101
06/11/03
2843
WOLCO
9203
113092
1101
06/11/03
2843
WOLCO
9203
TOTAL
CHECK
113093
1101
06/11/03
1643
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
9303
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL
REPORT
f
C
kw�
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
REPEATER ACCESS -4/03
O1 KAWASAKI REPAIR
OPERATING SUPPLIES
SECURITY REPAIR
IRRIGATION PARTS,TOOL
IRRIGATION REPAIR PRT
PLUMBING,HEATING SUPP
REFUND - BABYSITTING BA
4/17 -5/17 CH COPIES
4/17 -5/17 CH COPIES
4/17 -5/17 ANNEX COPIE
4/19- 5 /19PW COPIES
STANFORD ST SIGNS
PAGE NUMBER: 7
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
AMOUNT
24.12
63.00
18.00
126.00
40.50
184.50
9.00
9.00
450.00
28.94
7.75
14.99
22.48
9.09
13.89
68.20
30.00
72.58
100.32
82.06
70.05
325.01
69.18
25,423.70
25,423.70
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 06/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21
TIME: 16:30:11 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
1,422.30
1000
GENERAL FUND
12,187.15
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
94.53
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
8.04
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
3,409.15
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
992.00
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
655.88
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
4.02
2604
TEA 21 FEDERAL GRANTS
4.02
2605
GAS TAX
3,343.87
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
744.49
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
862.61
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
1,364.64
5001
SOLID WASTE AB939
81.00
6000
FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS
250.00
TOTAL
REPORT
25,423.70
b l
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE
NUMBER:
1
DATE: 06/12/03
CITY OF
MOORPARK,
CA
VENCHK21
TIME: 14:49:45
CHECK
REGISTER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND
- 1000
- GENERAL
FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - --- VENDOR - - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - --
AMOUNT
113094
1101
06/18/03
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
SZABO -WK END 5/23
720.00
113094
1101
06/18/03
2690
ACCOUNTEMPS
9102
SZABO -WK END 5/16
798.75
TOTAL
CHECK
1,518.75
113095
1101
06/18/03
3062
ADVANCED BORING
SPECIALIS
9640
TR MED SPRING TO FWY
9,841.96
113096
1101
06/18/03
3473
BERNARDS OFFICE
FURNITURE
9103
WORK STATION RECONFIG
1,196.62
113097
1101
06/18/03
1078
BSN SPORTS
9244
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES AN
293.49
113097
1101
06/18/03
1078
BSN SPORTS
9244
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES AN
293.48
113097
1101
06/18/03
1078
BSN SPORTS
9244
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES AN
97.96
113097
1101
06/18/03
1078
BSN SPORTS
9244
CAMP MOORPARK SUPPLIES AN
879.21
TOTAL
CHECK
1,564.14
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
3803
01359- 0157 -4/03N PRK
-38.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359- 0157 -4/03N PRK
253.33
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0105- 4 /03PW
35.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359- 0157 -4/03N PRK
38.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
3803
01359 - 0155- 4 /03USA
-4.20
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359- 0153- 4 /03CIVIC
2,747.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2734
01359 - 0099- 4 /03JANSS
128.25
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01359 - 0145- 4 /03MISSIO
17,086.45
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0098- 4 /03HR /PER
818.93
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359 - 0099- 4 /03JANSS
855.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359 - 0001- 4 /03RETAIN
50.40
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0105- 4 /03PW
35.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 4 /03RETAIN
8.89
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2734
01359- 0155- 4 /03USA
4.20
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
2754
01359 - 0155- 4 /03USA
28.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0098- 4 /03HR /PER
1,382.35
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0102- 4 /03COM DE
98.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0103- 4 /03COM SR
70.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536 - 0039- 4 /03NAVARR
378.97
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0099- 4 /03CRA
29.63
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0040- 4 /03LUCAS
90.98
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536 - 0041- 4 /03GARCIA
1,085.19
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0146- 4 /03MACNEI
525.81
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0147- 4 /03BERMUD
441.92
113095
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0148- 4 /03HORST
435.30
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0149- 4 /03ANAYA
728.96
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359- 0001- 4 /03RETAIN
1,003.91
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
3803
01359- 0099- 4 /03ADMIN
- 128.25
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9121
01359 - 0001- 4 /03RETAIN
177.16
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0105- 4 /03PW
61.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9122
01359 - 0102- 4 /03COM DE
755.19
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536 - 0001- 4 /03CEO
98.00
113098
1101
06/18/03
1083
BURKE,
WILLIAMS
& SORENSE
9123
01536- 0038- 4 /03KRIEG
9.95
TOTAL
CHECK
29,290.32
113099
1101
06/18/03
1089
CA DEPARTMENT
OF CONSERVA
2603
2/03 SMIP FEES
558.19
113099
(
1101
06/18/03
1089
CA DEPARTMENT
OF CONSERVA
2603
3/03 SMIP FEES
323.55
113099
1101
06/18/03
1089
CA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVA
2603
1/03 SMIP FEES
1,004.20
TOTAL
CHECK
1,885.94
113100
1101
06/18/03
2554
CHANEY
WELDING
9103
MTN MEADOWS TRASH ENC
734.80
113100
1101
06/18/03
2554
CHANEY
WELDING
9103
CMPS PRK TRASH ENCLOS
734.80
+
PENTAMATION -
FUND ACCOUNTING
PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 06/12/03
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
VENCHK21
TIME: 14:49:45
CHECK
REGISTER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND
- 1000
- GENERAL
FUND
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - --
VENDOR--------
- - - - --
ACCT
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - -
-- AMOUNT
113100
1101
06/18/03
2554
CHANEY WELDING
9103
TR PRK TRASH ENCLOSUR
734.80
TOTAL
CHECK
2,204.40
113101
1101
06/18/03
1136
COACH
USA
9102
4 /03CITY BUS MAINT
19,845.32
113101
1101
06/18/03
1136
COACH
USA
9102
5 /03CITY BUS MAINT
18,943.26
TOTAL
CHECK
38,788.58
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
PARKS SUPPLIES
4.93
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
AVRC SUPPLIES
64.09
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM SRVC SUPPLIES
28.22
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9208
SR CTR SHREDDER /BAGS
2,942.18
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
SR CTR SUPPLIES
142.95
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
SR CTR SUPPLIES
150.39
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM SRVC SUPPLIES
-9.65
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
AVRC SUPPLIES
97.58
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
PW SUPPLIES
9.01
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
PRKNG ENF SUPPLIES
17.12
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
C CLERK SUPPLIES
27.89
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
PW SUPPLIES
48.26
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPLIE
27.24
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
C CLERK SUPPLIES
167.29
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9205
C MGR KEYBOARDS
705.71
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM SRVC SUPPLIES
33.41
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM SRVC SUPPLIES
17.20
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM DEV SUPPLIES
302.16
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9201
TONER /COMPUTER SUPPLI
322.46
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
MRA SUPPLIES
4.72
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9203
PAPER SUPPLIES
18.88
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
C CLERK SUPPLIES
35.52
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
C CLERK SUPPLIES RTN
-20.72
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
ADMIN SUPPLIES
153.49
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM DEV SUPPLIES
39.16
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
ADMIN SUPPLIES
- 127.08
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
FINANCE SUPPLIES
6.24
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
FINANCE SUPPLIES
62.32
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
171.81
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
135.99
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
COMM DEV SUPPLIES
4.93
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9203
PAPER SUPPLIES
144.73
113102
1101
06/18/03
1172
DATA
BYTE
CENTRAL
INC
9202
C MGR SUPPLIES
48.26
TOTAL
CHECK
5,776.69
113103
1101
06/18/03
1179
DIAL
SECURITY
9102
5 /5- 9METROLINK GUARD
598.00
113103
1101
06/18/03
1179
DIAL
SECURITY
9103
6 /03AVRC MONITORING
180.00
113103
1101
06/18/03
1179
DIAL
SECURITY
9103
6 /03SHADYRIDGE BUFFER
180.00
113103
1101
06/18/03
1179
DIAL
SECURITY
9102
5 /27- 30METROLINK GUAR
478.40
113103
1101
06/18/03
1179
DIAL
SECURITY
9102
5 /19- 5 /23METROLINK
598.00
TOTAL
CHECK
2,034.40
k`�
113104
1101
06/18/03
3526
DIAMOND MANUFACTURING, IN
9505
FAREBOXES
1,360.00
113104
1101
06/18/03
3526
DIAMOND MANUFACTURING, IN
9505
FREIGHT
66.90
v
TOTAL
CHECK
1,426.90
113105
1101
06/18/03
3540
ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION, INC
9630
AVCP PHASE II CONSTRU
266,871.51
113106
A
1101
06/18/03
3541
FIELDING,
STEVE R
9244
SKYDIVING TEAM
2,800.00
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING
DATE: 06/12/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA
TIME: 14:49:45 CHECK REGISTER
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT ------- DESCRIPTION-
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9225
RDA MTG PRKNG
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
MPK CHAMBER MTG -CM
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
MPK CHAMBER MTG -COM D
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
MPK CHAMBER MTG -ADMIN
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9222
BROUSSALIAN- CONEJO VA
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9208
CHAIN SAW BENCH GRIND
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
MPK CHAMBER MTG -COM S
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9222
TRAN- PESTICIDE SEMINA
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9244
VONS- SPRING CAMP SUPP
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9244
WEST COAST PIZZA -CMP
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9102
4/03EZ2 INTERNET SRVC
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9223
MPK CHAMBER MTG -MRA
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9205
AMRO- COIN,BILL COUNTE
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9225
SOUTHWEST - JOHNSTON MI
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9225
PARVIN- LEAGUE OF CA
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9225
MAYOR -MUSD DECATH EXP
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9220
ECO DEV- CLOUDY SKIES
113107
1101
06/18/03
2529
I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER
9225
RDA MTG LODGING -4 EMP
TOTAL
CHECK
113108
1101
06/18/03
2826
J.C. CONSTRUCTION
9632
INSTALL OF PARK MONUMENT
113108
1101
06/18/03
2826
J.C. CONSTRUCTION
9632
INSTALL OF PARK MONUMENT
113108
1101
06/18/03
2826
J.C. CONSTRUCTION
9632
INSTALL OF PARK MONUMENT
113108
1101
06/18/03
2826
J.C. CONSTRUCTION
9632
INSTALL OF PARK MONUMENT
TOTAL
CHECK
113109
1101
06/18/03
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
6 /03SR CTR JANITORIAL
113109
1101
06/18/03
1315
KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES
9102
6 /03JANITORIAL SRVCS
TOTAL
CHECK
113110
1101
06/18/03
3218
MOORPARK PARTNERS, LLC
2710
REFUND - GRADING PERMIT
113110
1101
06/18/03
3218
MOORPARK PARTNERS, LLC
2730
REFUND - GRADING PERMIT
TOTAL
CHECK
113111
1101
06/18/03
2486
OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPAN
9285
RELOCATION RENTAL AST
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4/03C MGR PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03SR CTR PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03FINANCE PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4/03C COUNCIL PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03COMM SRVC PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03CITY HALL PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03MRA /ECO PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03REC PHONE
113112
1101
06/18/03
1784
PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM
9420
4 /03ST MAINT PHONE
TOTAL
CHECK
,.�
113113
1101
06/18/03
1451
POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION
9601
SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR
d
113114
Cyr 1101
06/18/03
3200
ROLLINS CONSULTING, INC.
9102
DEMOLITION MGT SRVCS
113115
1101
06/18/03
2809
RONNY AND THE CLASSICS
9244
OPENING CONCERT
113116
1101
06/18/03
1513
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
9253
5 /03INTERSECTION MAIN
PAGE NUMBER: 3
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
AMOUNT
3.00
60.00
20.00
20.00
125.00
308.34
20.00
65.00
34.49
74.81
45.00
40.00
618.00
8.50
393.00
744.51
30.00
670.00
3,279.65
1,050.00
1,050.00
3,160.00
5,040.00
10,300.00
589.00
960.00
1,549.00
2,159.54
925.52
3,085.06
13,902.00
22.10
14.84
14.98
9.55
45.08
1,032.26
4.70
64.06
54.02
1,261.59
474.47
3,100.00
1,100.00
1,405.65
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 06/12/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21
TIME: 14:49:45 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND
CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - --- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13PCH HILL PRK
979.03
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13VILLA CAMPES
55.16
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13CNTRY TRAIL
12.96
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13MOBILEHOME
36.73
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13AVCP
1,568.53
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13VECTOR
59.22
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13VIRGINIA COL
11.75
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13TIERRA REJAD
105.12
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13GLENWOOD PRK
27.08
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13MTN MEADOWS
95.60
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13PCH HILL PRK
529.61
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13GRIFFIN PRK
64.09
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13CAMPUS CYN
28.18
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13ZONE 9
2.07
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13ZONE 8
38.75
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13ZONE 10
111.81
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 7
40.17
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 11
13.82
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 5
13.77
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 12
98.13
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13CAMPUS PRK
36.31
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14 -5/13 798 MPK AVE
88.49
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13ZONE 6
12.96
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13COMM CTR
1,214.91
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ST MAINT
58.66
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9414
4 /14- 5 /13TPAFFIC SIGN
1,149.64
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9414
4 /14- 5 /13METROLINK
138.19
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9414
4 /14- 5 /13CITYWIDE
22,349.45
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13PRKWYS & MED
114.68
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9414
4 /14- 5 /13SCHOOL PROPE
7.37
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13CITY HALL
1,499.31
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 4
13.36
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 2
40.32
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13AVRC
1,086.71
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4 /14- 5 /13REDEVELOPMEN
15.09
113117
1101
06/18/03
1536
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISO
9413
4/14- 5 /13ZONE 1
19.23
TOTAL
CHECK
31,736.26
113118
1101
06/18/03
3486
SUPER GRAPHIC SIGN
COMPAN
9103
MOUNTAIN MEADOWS ENTRY SI
1,202.81
113118
1101
06/18/03
3486
SUPER GRAPHIC SIGN
COMPAN
9103
INSTALLATION
379.84
TOTAL
CHECK
1,582.65
113119
1101
06/18/03
3494
THOMAS, MICKEY
9244
STARSHIP PERFORMANCE
4,000.00
113120
1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03MPK PD FUEL
28.35
113120
1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03REC FUEL
107.17
113120
1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03PARKS FUEL
393.51
113120
1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03PW ST FUEL
750.48
113120
1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03X- GUARDS FUEL
17.44
113120
q
k X1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03VECTOR FUEL
198.28
113120
( -,1101
06/18/03
1600
UNION 76
9255
4 /03TRAFFIC ENF FUEL
26.15
113120 C.,, 1101 06/18/03 1600 UN1UN 7b yt55 4 /03ew ADmil V FUEL lo. »
pp ➢" TOTAL CHECK 1,539.77
113121 ;`',1101 06/18/03 3563 VENTURA ASBESTOS CONTROL, 9611 ASBESTOS REMOVAL 3,250.00
C
PENTAMATION
- FUND ACCOUNTING
5 /030VERTIME- REG,CT
7,046.49
DATE: 06/12/03
12,691.76
5 /03INVESTIGATIVE SRV
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CA
TIME: 14:49:45
182,027.08
5 /03COMM SRVCS
CHECK
REGISTER
5 /03SPEC ENF DETAIL
FUND -
1000 - GENERAL FUND
5 /03TRAFFIC SRVCS
27,828.08
5 /03HSRO
CHECK NUMBER
CASH ACCT
DATE ISSUED
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR--------
- - - - --
ACCT
113122
1101
06/18/03
1135
VENTURA COUNTY
DISTRICT A
9102
113123
1101
06/18/03
1615
VENTURA COUNTY
FIRE PROTE
2602
113123
1101
06/18/03
1615
VENTURA COUNTY
FIRE PROTE
2602
TOTAL
CHECK
5 /6- 5 /19GLENWOOD PRK
1,089.10
113124
1101
06/18/03
3482
VENTURA COUNTY
LIBRARY
9205
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9244
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9118
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9254
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
113125
1101
06/18/03
1616
VENTURA COUNTY
SHERIFF'S
9117
TOTAL
CHECK
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9252
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
113126
1101
06/18/03
1620
VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS
9415
TOTAL
CHECK
113127
1101
06/18/03
1621
VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS
9102
113128
1101
06/18/03
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9252
113128
1101
06/18/03
1624
VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN
9205
TOTAL
CHECK
113129
1101
06/18/03
3053
ZAMBELLI FIREWORKS MANUFA
9244
TOTAL
FUND
TOTAL
REPORT
be
c�
PAGE NUMBER: 5
VENCHK21
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT
02 /03WITNESS PROTECTS 3,168.00
3/03 FIRE FEES 1,860.08
1/03 FIRE FEES 13,795.59
15,655.67
MPK LIBRARY SUPPLIES 69,108.14
5 /03AFTER DARK EVENT
293.46
5 /030VERTIME- REG,CT
7,046.49
5 /03VEHICLE CHARGES
12,691.76
5 /03INVESTIGATIVE SRV
32,035.33
5 /03PATROL SRVCS
182,027.08
5 /03COMM SRVCS
10,594.08
5 /03SPEC ENF DETAIL
10,764.58
5 /03TRAFFIC SRVCS
27,828.08
5 /03HSRO
9,627.67
5 /03DARE -5TH GRADE
9,627.67
5 /03MSRO
9,627.67
312,163.87
5/6- 5 /19ZONE 2
1,596.60
5/6- 5 /19ZONE 6
31.26
5 /6- 5 /19ZONE 3
73.80
5 /6- 5 /19ZONE 7
1,056.61
5 /6- 5 /19VILLA CAMPESI
26.25
5 /6- 5 /19MILLER PRK
2,935.60
5 /6- 5 /19REDEVELOPMENT
119.79
5 /6- 5 /19GLENWOOD PRK
1,089.10
5/6- 5 /19ZONE 12
8,240.63
5 /6- 5 /19MONTE VISTA
28.76
5 /6- 5 /19PCH HILL PRK
1,629.72
5 /6- 5 /19PARKS
1,852.09
5/6- 5 /19ZONE 5
272.14
5 /6- 5 /19PRKWYS & MED
1,279.93
20,232.28
5 /03VIDEO PROD & BBS
2,922.00
POINDEXTER SECURITY
469.76
AVCP SOFTBALL FIELDS
1,249.24
1,719.00
FIREWORKS DISPLAY -FIN 4,500.00
876,235.27
876,235.27
PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 06/12/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21
TIME: 14:49:56 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 12/02
FUND
FUND TITLE
AMOUNT
0100
INTERNAL SERVICES FUND
3,378.94
1000
GENERAL FUND
339,987.35
2000
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
60.71
2002
CITY -WIDE TRAFFIC MITIGAT
474.47
2100
COMMUNITY WIDE
266,871.51
2111
ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 1
1,050.00
2112
ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 2
1,050.00
2113
ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 3
8,200.00
2154
LIBRARY FACILITIES
69,108.14
2200
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
21,630.49
2300
AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE
23,751.43
2301
AD 84 -2 ZONE 1
19.23
2302
AD 84 -2 ZONE 2
1,636.92
2303
AD 84 -2 ZONE 3
73.80
2304
AD 84 -2 ZONE 4
13.36
2305
AD 84 -2 ZONE 5
285.91
2306
AD 84 -2 ZONE 6
44.22
2307
AD 84 -2 ZONE 7
1,096.78
2308
AD 84 -2 ZONE 8
218.75
2309
AD 84 -2 ZONE 9
2.07
2310
AD 84 -2 ZONE 10
1,694.46
2311
AD 84 -2 ZONE 11
13.82
2312
AD 84 -2 ZONE 12
8,338.76
2400
PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
14,597.75
2501
LOS ANGELES A.O.C.
35.00
2502
TIERRA REJADA A.O.C.
9,841.96
2605
GAS TAX
3,726.79
2609
OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS
10,764.58
2901
MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC
13,943.45
2902
MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER
27,286.71
5000
LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C
42,646.07
6005
UW /CCB TR4340,1,2,3 &4792
3,085.06
6515
USA PROPERTIES
32.20
6534
NORTH PARK VILLAGE
291.33
6925
JANSS IV RECREATION INC.
983.25
TOTAL
REPORT
876,235.27
4 v'
r
ITEM 10-C.
to - 1$- Z003 -
}?�02oo3 -Z�o3. Cs-�
�/Yz
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM:
Cindy
Borchard, Administrative
Services
Director
DATE:
June
10, 2003 (Council Meeting
of June
18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Establishing the Appropriation
Limitation for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 for the City of
Moorpark at $16,650,451.
BACKGROUND
Proposition 4 was approved by the voters of California in 1979
adding Article XIII B to the State Constitution. The
Proposition places a limit on the growth of general fund
appropriations by government entities.
DISCUSSION
Proposition 4 (the "Gann Limitations ") was adopted by California
voters in November 1979 and added Article XIII B to the State
Constitution. The Proposition limited the growth in
appropriations of state and local governments to the increase in
the jurisdiction's population and the increase in the State
price index. For FY 2002 -2003 the limitation was $14,627,654.
The information provided by the State Department of Finance, as
required by the Government Code, indicated a 9.23% change in
cost index and a 4.21% change in population. Accordingly, the
City of Moorpark's limitation for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 is
$16,650,451. General Fund appropriations which are subject to
this limitation (some appropriations are exempt) for FY 2003-
2004 are estimated to be $6,726,838, well below this amount.
C
Honorable City Council
June 10, 2003
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2003-
Attached: Resolution No. 2003-
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY'S
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the State Constitution limits
annual appropriations for certain general fund revenues for
state and local governments; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 7910 requires that a city
establish its annual appropriations limitation by resolution at
a public meeting of the legislative body; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 appropriations
limitation has been calculated in accordance with the State
Constitution and applicable sections of the Government Code by
adjusting its Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 appropriations limit of
$14,627,654 by a cost index change of 9.23% and a population
change of 4.21% as determined by the California Department of
Finance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The appropriations limitation for the City of
Moorpark during Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 is hereby determined to be
$16,650,451.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
ITEM 10 .-Z .
CD - l .9 - 2003
O U_ po0
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Cindy Borchard, Administrative Services Director
DATE: May 30, 2003 (City Council Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
BACKGROUND
Community Development Law allows Redevelopment Agencies to
borrow funds from the City in support of the Agency's mission
and goals. Several times since the creation of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency, the City has loaned funds to the Agency
for specific purposes. All loans have been repaid, or will be
repaid by June 30, 2003.
DISCUSSION
In the coming year, the Agency has budgeted approximately $7.8
million in expenditures, including $6.2 million for capital
improvements. While the Agency's annual revenues and existing
fund balances are sufficient to finance these expenditures, it
is our practice for all expenditures to be paid by the City,
then these "advances" are repaid by the Agency. This is a
common practice intended to comply with state laws that require
Redevelopment Agencies to incur debt.
Staff is recommending a loan from the City to the Agency in the
amount of $5,000,000 as an advance for anticipated operating and
capital expenditures for the coming year. The Agency would be
charged a rate equal to the rate earned on investments (the
"LAIF" rate) plus 1 %; currently this would be approximately 3 %.
The loan would be provided by the City General Fund, which
currently has sufficient cash available, and would be due no
later than or June 30, 2004.
t r f-i / 0
Honorable City Council
May 30, 2003
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote)
Adopt Resolution No. 2003- , approving a Loan Agreement with
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency.
Attachment: Resolution No. 2003 -
Loan Agreement
aF'k4'0t���°1
RESOLUTION 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LOAN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOORPARK AND
THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark has agreed to advance funds
to the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency in accordance with the
terms of a Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency has agreed to
accept the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement dated July
1, 2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark
and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency dated July 1, 2003, and
attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution, is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
EXHIBIT "A"
LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS LOAN AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of July, 2003,
by and between the City of Moorpark ( "City ") and the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Agency was created by Ordinance 87, adopted by
the City Council on March 18, 1987, for the purpose of
eliminating blighted conditions within specified project areas;
and
WHEREAS, in support of its mission, the Agency is
developing and implementing plans to acquire and construct
certain public facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that, in order to
undertake this redevelopment project, temporary financial
assistance in the form of a loan is required from the City of
Moorpark; and
WHEREAS, Section 33600 et. seq. of the California Community
Redevelopment Law authorizes the Agency to borrow money or
accept financial or other assistance from the City.
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY AND AGENCY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Amount and Use of Loan. The City, from its
General Fund, will advance to the Agency the amount of
$5,000,000 (five million dollars). Agency agrees to use such
loan proceeds only for those purposes set forth in the Health
and Safety Code and approved by the Agency.
SECTION 2. Repayment of Funds. The Agency will repay this
loan, both principal and interest, in full on or before June 30,
2004, unless extended by amendment to this Agreement.
SECTION 3. Interest Payment. This loan will bear interest
at a rate equivalent to the rate earned by City investments in
the Local Agency Investment Fund, plus one percent.
AA'aA \r"'"j1P
Loan Agreement, Page 2
July 1, 2003
SECTION 4. Obligation Constitutes Indebtedness. This loan
agreement shall constitute an obligation and debt of the Agency
to use all available increment revenue to repay the City. Such
indebtedness shall be subordinate to any and all other Agency
indebtedness incurred by the Agency, including indebtedness
incurred through the issuance of tax allocation notes or bonds
or any other bonds of the Agency.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as
of the date first written above.
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF MOORPARK
Patrick Hunter, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Agency Secretary
Steven Kueny, City Manager
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
City Clerk
ITEM 10-E7 .
(p - (8- Z003
Ae6*d Reno
Zoo3 - z low A1: proue J
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
To: Honorable City Council
From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst
Date: June 4, 2003 (CC Meeting of June 18, 2003)
Subject: Consider Reso
Between the
Redevelopment
Parcel "C"
Redevelopment
Complex
BACKGROUND
lution Approving an Agreement by and
City of Moorpark and Moorpark
Agency for the City's Purchase of
Parcel Map No. 5426 from the
Agency, for a Human Services
Approximately 2 acres of excess property was identified by the
Redevelopment Agency at the southeast corner of the railroad
tracks and Spring Road, north of the site identified for the
future Police Services Complex, and more particularly
described as Parcel "C" of Parcel Map No. 5426. On March 5,
2003, in a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council re-
allocated $370,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds for the acquisition of this property from the Agency, in
order to develop a Human Services Complex. Additional CDBG
funds in the amount of $96,667 for FY 2003/2004 were also
allocated for this purchase.
DISCUSSION
Required environmental procedures have been completed and the
City has received HUD's authorization to expend funds on this
project. The purchase price of $653,175 is to be paid from
CDBG funds as indicated above, with 2 more payments of $93,254
to be made in each of the following fiscal years, FY 2004/2005
and FY 2005/2006. Public hearings will be held prior to each
of these 2 fiscal years, at which time Council will be asked
Honorable City Council
Date 06/04/03
Page 2
to authorize CDBG funds as the source of the 2 payments of
$93,254 each.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote Required)
1. Approve Resolution No. 2003- approving the Purchase
Agreement with Loan Terms and amending the FY 2002/2003
budget to appropriate $370,000 for this purpose; and
2. Direct the City Manager, on behalf of the City, to
execute Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms, subject to
final language approval by the City Manager and City
Attorney.
Attachments: Resolution No. 2003 -
Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms
cna %e-' r'?t "
' '. W r.J� 041
RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS PARCEL "C" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5426,
APPROVING PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH LOAN TERMS,
AND AMENDING THE ADOPTED FY 2002/2003 BUDGET
FOR $370,000
WHEREAS, after selecting a design for the Police Services
Facility on a parcel of approximately 7.59 acres at the
southeast corner of the railroad tracks and Spring Road, the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency found that approximately 2 acres
of land is not required for completion of the police station and
other commitments; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2003, the Moorpark City Council
considered and approved the development of a Human Services
Complex on this excess property, in order to provide a safe area
for day laborers to congregate and a permanent location for non-
profit social service organizations, such as Catholic Charities,
from which to serve primarily low income clients; and
WHEREAS, on that same date, the Council re- allocated
$370,000 from previous years' Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds for the acquisition of the above - mentioned excess
property from the Redevelopment Agency and on that same date
also authorized $96,667 in CDBG funds for FY 2003/2004, funds
which are not yet available to the City; and
WHEREAS, this action addresses the following items from the
City's approved FY 2002/2003 Goals and Objectives:
Coordinate the City's efforts to resolve concerns with
day laborers. (B1)
In conjunction with other
with Catholic Charities to
Moorpark. (F14)
interested agencies, work
locate a permanent site in
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The real property that is the subject of this
resolution consists of Parcel "C" of Parcel Map No. 5426 as
described on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
incorporated herein, and as more particularly depicted on
Exhibit "B" which is also attached hereto and incorporated
herein.
SECTION 2. Either the City Manager or the Mayor is
authorized to execute the Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms and
any other documents required to effect this transaction.
SECTION 3. A budget amendment in the amount of $370,000 in
CDBG funds is described in Exhibit "D ", attached hereto, is
hereby approved.
SECTION 4. This resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be
filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Map
Exhibit "B" Legal Description
Exhibit "C" Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms
Exhibit "D" Budget Amendment
0 $-'�q.--:,7 A
;./0.0 -k.'-4
IL
"AP
acws r- low,
PARCEL MAP NO. 5426
FllYZTlclvv, 04, MAIII, "I" "I'll l2eW- 1,
(tp,y,,WP,4AW pWA-.l�jrR4` � 774Crl
%4wvupA CA om
0144"480 I-W 2 SI070'J
tij
9 Cr
i 7-
ig
(D
LQ cn
(D 0
ct
N-
O
0
z
0
K)
0
0
LA)
I
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 4
Exhibit "B"
Legal Description
Parcel C of Parcel Map 5426 in the City of Moorpark, County of
Ventura, State of California, as per map recorded in Book ,
Page of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder
of said County
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 5
Exhibit "C"
PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH LOAN TERMS
Human Services Complex
THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH LOAN TERMS is made and entered
into this 18th day of June 2003, by and between the City of
Moorpark ( "City") and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
( "Agency ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase land upon which to
develop a Human Services Complex, to provide a permanent
location for the provision of social services to low income
individuals and households in Moorpark; and
WHEREAS, the Agency desires to sell excess land to the City
for this same purpose; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. adopted June 18, 2003 by
the Moorpark City Council and Resolution No. , adopted
on this same date by the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, set
forth more particulars regarding the real property that is the
subject of this Agreement and the intentions of both City and
Agency, pertaining to this transaction.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the City and
the Agency as follows:
SECTION 1. The land that is the subject of this Agreement
consists of approximately 2 acres which lie southeast of the
railroad tracks and Spring Road, known as Parcel "C" of Parcel
Map No. 5426, as described on Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and
incorporated herein, and as more particularly described on
Exhibit "B ", also attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. The purchase price for this property shall be
$653,175, and represents fair market value, as determined by an
independent appraisal.
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 6
SECTION 3. Payment shall consist of $370,000, to be paid
from the City's unexpended CDBG funds from previous years'
allocations, 1 payment of $96,667 from FY 2003/2004 CDBG funds,
and a payment of $93,254 in each of the following 2 years,
namely, FY 2004/2005 and FY 2005/2006. No interest shall be
payable on this loan.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date first written above.
CITY OF MOORPARK
Steven Kueny, City Manager
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
City Clerk
Exhibit "A" Map
Exhibit "B" Legal Description
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Patrick Hunter, Chair
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Agency Secretary
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 7
EXHIBIT D
BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FY 2002 -03
FUND ALLOCATION FROM:
Fund
Account Number
Amount
Amended
Account Number
Budget
CDBG
2701 -5500
370,000.00
Total
$ -
370,000.00
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATION TO EXPENSE ACCOUNTS:
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATION TO REVENUE ACCOUNTS:
Current
Amended
Account Number
Budget
Revision
Budget
2701 - 2440 - 5020 -9820
$ -
370,000.00
370,000.00
Total
$ -
370,000.00
370,000.00
DISTRIBUTION OF APPROPRIATION TO REVENUE ACCOUNTS:
Approved as to Form: (j
Current
Amended
Account Number
Budget
Revision
Budget
2902 -3720
1,300,000.00
370,000.00
1,670,000.00
Total
1,300,000.00
370,000.00
1,670,000.00
Approved as to Form: (j
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
ITEM 10 • r.
(P i 8- Zoo3
Apf;rOved
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services /C
DATE: June 4, 2003 (CC Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Moorpark Library Expenditures for Fiscal Year
03/04
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to endorse and recommend to the
County of Ventura the expenditure of funds for library materials
as recommended by the City's Library Advisory Committee. The
total amount available for expenditure in FY 03/04 is $63,800.
BACKGROUND
When the Library Service Areas were created by a Memorandum of
Understanding, including the County and the 7 cities serviced by
the Ventura County Library District, base budgets were
established for large, midsized, and small libraries. The base
budgets were the bare minimum needed to operate each library
based on its size category. The library materials budget
established at that time allocated $4,100 for midsized libraries
- this includes Moorpark and Port Hueneme. This continues to be
the Moorpark Library's annual material budget. To expand the
budget beyond the established base, Service Areas must rely on
any library property tax revenue generated in excess of the base
budget (unallocated property tax fund balance) or use their own
jurisdiction's general funds. Moorpark is in an enviable
situation as one of only three Library Service Areas that has an
unallocated property tax fund balance to enhance its library
operations. The other two Library Service Areas also in this
position are Camarillo and Simi Valley.
M:\MLindley \LIBRARY \library expenditure plan 03 -04 ccagd.doc
'✓ v' Fv tv
The Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 2
The Ventura County Library proposed FY 03/04 Budget for the
Moorpark Library includes an unallocated property tax fund
balance of $63,800. This fund balance is attributable to the
property tax revenue generated from the Moorpark Library Service
Area, over and above that which is budgeted for base library
operations. Pursuant to the policy adopted by the Library
Commission, cities in Library Service Areas with positive
property tax fund balances are responsible for deciding how best
to spend those funds.
The Moorpark Library Service Area property tax fund balance,
available to the City, can be spent on almost anything
associated with the Library including materials, computers,
furniture, building improvements and expansions, staff, and
hours of operation. However, any expenditure that results in
ongoing costs, such as maintenance or ongoing staff hours,
becomes the financial responsibility of the Moorpark Library
operating budget.
In FY 01/02, the Council recommended using some of the
unallocated balance to make the part time children's librarian
full time, which allowed the Library to expand its hours of
operation from 40 hours a week to 54 hours. However, it is
important to note that the additional time added to the
children's librarian continues to be covered by the revenues
generated by the Moorpark Library Service Area. In effect, this
lowers the available unallocated property tax fund balance that
would otherwise be available. This would be the case with any
expenditure which creates ongoing financial obligations.
DISCUSSION
The City's Library Advisory Committee, comprised of Mayor
Hunter, Councilmember Mikos, Moorpark Librarian Bernadett
McDowell, and Moorpark Friends of the Library representatives
Marilyn Ludwig, Gilbert Bahn, and Dave Sakata, met on June 4,
2003, to discuss an expenditure proposal (Attachment A)
presented by Ms. McDowell. As in past years, the expenditure
proposal includes reference materials, periodicals, children's
fiction and nonfiction, adult fiction and nonfiction, large
print books, Spanish language materials, book tapes, and videos.
The Honorable City Council
June 18, 2003
Page 3
The very nature of a library requires it to update its material
collection every year. A goal set by the Library District is to
spend $2.00 per capita for library material annually. The
unallocated fund balance that has been available to the Moorpark
Library Service Area over the past five years has allowed it to
meet that expenditure goal. As a result, the Moorpark Library
has a strong material collection, significantly improved over
the years prior to FY 98/99.
Since the property tax money attributable to the Moorpark
Library Service Area is the County of Ventura Library District's
revenue, the City's action will be forwarded to the Ventura
County Board of Supervisors. It takes a two - thirds vote of the
Board to oppose the City's recommended expenditures of the
Moorpark Library Service Area unallocated property tax funds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the library material collection expenditure
recommendation of the Moorpark Library Advisory Committee for
submittal to the County of Ventura Board of Supervisors.
ar'�C.� -1 "
MOORPARK LIBRARY
PROPOSED SPENDING PLAN, 2003/2004
General Reference
$6,000
Periodicals
$3,000
Children's Fiction
$10,000
Children's Nonfiction
$15,000
McNaughton Book Plan
$6,200
Adult Fiction
$500
Adult Nonfiction
$13,800
Large Print Book Plan
$1,600
Spanish Language Materials
$2,800
Books on Tape /CD
$3,300
Videos /DVDs
$1,600
Total: $63,800
A t-- -4-1 rn -e4
C C (� /```*413
0
ITEM 1 o. G.
MWOMMUMMMM
I�,eGO rmw�dc�.�-co�'t As I�rnencle�
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE: June 9, 2003 (CC Meeting of June 18, 2003)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Mission Statement, Priorities,
Goals and Objectives for FY 2003/2004
Attached is the referenced document as tentatively approved by
the City Council on June 4, 2003. All legislative formatting has
been removed and objectives have been renumbered as needed from
the report considered as Agenda Item 9.F. on June 4, 2003. The
specific changes include the following:
1. The addition of six objectives from the list of "Potential
Objectives" identified as Objectives A.3, B.14, F.27, G.25,
G.26, and G.27.
2. Two new objectives identified as Objectives B.15 and C.14.
3. Clarification that the "Top Ten (10) Priorities" are all of
equal priority and adding improvements to Los Angeles Avenue
(East) as a top priority.
4. The elimination of the truck ban on Los Angeles Avenue /New
Los Angeles Avenue as both a top priority and as an
objective.
5. The addition of ** to denote those objectives that are
directly related to an identified "Top Ten (10) Priority."
(Note that Objective G.6 has been added in support of the
OSCAR update in the Top Ten (10) Priorities.)
6. Modification of Objective F.14 to include evaluation of the
current 5th Grade D.A.R.E. position.
G'.r �.✓ w bad
Moorpark City Council Agenda Report
Re: Goals and Objectives FY 2003/2004
Page 2
City Council Meeting of June 18, 2003
7. Removal of the reference to College View Park in Objective
F.22.
In addition, I have attached the updated list of "Potential
Objectives," which now has 35 items since 6 additional items
became 2003/04 FY objectives. (Staff already recommended that
nine (9) be added as 2003/04 FY objectives and two (2) be
deleted). Potential Objective 13 now includes reference to the
undergrounding of overhead utilities on Tierra Rejada Road east
of Spring Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives for
Fiscal Year 2003/2004.
SK:db
Attachments (2)
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Goals & Obj FY 03 -04 Agenda Rpt for 0618 2003.doc
�/ D FA f % 07" e"W e
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals,
Objectives
FY 2003/2004
and
CITY OF MOORPARK
Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals, and Objectives
For FY 2003/2004
CITY MISSION STATEMENT
Striving to preserve and improve the quality of life in Moorpark.
TOP TEN (10) PRIORITIES*
1. Construct new City Hall and Corporate Yard Facility. (F2,
F18 & G27)
2. Construct police station. (C9 & F15)
3. Comprehensive update of General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Elements and adopt updated OSCAR Element to
insure internal consistency among all elements of the
General Plan. (G4, G6 & G11)
4. Widen Los Angeles Avenue /New Los Angeles Avenue (SR118) to
six travel lanes from Tierra Rejada Road to SR 23 Freeway
with a raised median and traffic signal interconnect system
and improve Los Angeles Avenue (East) from Condor Drive west
to 1500 feet east of Spring Road. (Cl a), b), c), & d and
C4)
5. Construct a permanent truck scale facility west of the City.
(C6)
6. Widening of Moorpark Avenue /Walnut Canyon Road from Los
Angeles Avenue (SR118) to north City limits. (C10 & C11)
7. Construct Moorpark Human Services Complex. (F13)
8. Increase City's General Fund revenue through enhancement of
existing revenue sources including business attraction and
retention programs and establishment of additional revenue
sources. (D1, D2, D5, D7, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15, D16, D17,
& F10)
9. Enhance open space and greenbelt areas and determine
feasibility of establishing a trail system along the Arroyo
Simi and work with other public agencies to develop a
comprehensive Arroyo Simi Management Plan that incorporates
flood control, habitat preservation /restoration, and
recreation components. (G5, G15 & G25)
10. Develop and implement program to encourage new multi and
single family housing on underutilized sites within the
Downtown Specific Plan area and increase the number of
affordable housing units. (B5, B6, B11, & G8)
* The listed items are considered to have equal priority.
2
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
'v of FwB E.e
DEPARTMENTAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The abbreviation used after each objective indicates which
department has responsibility for it. If more than one
abbreviation is used, the first one shown has primary
responsibility for that objective. The abbreviations and
corresponding departments used are as follows:
(ACM)
Assistant City Manager
(AS)
Administrative Services
(CA)
City Attorney
(CC)
City Clerk
(CD)
Community Development
(CE)
City Engineer
(CM)
City Manager
(CS)
Community Services
(MRA)
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
(PD)
Police Department
(PW)
Public Works
** Denotes those objectives related to an identified Top Ten
Priority.
A. Expand and encourage community involvement in establishing
the general policies of the City and increase the public's
understanding of local government operations.
1. Develop a general emergency preparedness manual for
distribution to Moorpark residents. The manual will
outline how to prepare for, and what to do following a
disaster. (ACM)
2. Complete enhanced city web site that provides for
downloadable brochures of City services and submission
of electronic messages pertaining to City Council,
Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting agenda items prior to 1:00 p.m. on
day of meeting. (AS & CC)
3. Tape monthly announcements of upcoming city- sponsored
activities for replay on the City Government Channel.
(ACM)
3
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
C erT1 F � R"4i �'A lJ
B. Revitalize downtown Moorpark with a focus on High Street and
the surrounding business district and residential
neighborhoods, which includes consideration of public rail
transit, potential for increased residential density, and
governmental and related public uses.
1. Coordinate the City's efforts to resolve concerns with
day laborers. (MRA)
2. Complete project to landscape the railroad frontage
property along Moorpark Avenue, including the vacant
area west of the south Metrolink parking lot. (CS &
MRA)
3. Install landscaping and downtown identification signs
at entrances to High Street. (MRA)
4. Complete the design for the Spring Road widening
project from the railroad tracks south to Los Angeles
Avenue and proceed with right -of -way acquisition. (PW)
** 5. Review and consider revisions to the Downtown Specific
Plan including but not limited to the vision, policies,
land use, zoning and development standards and uses for
City /Agency owned properties. (CD & MRA)
** 6. Develop program to encourage new multi and single
family housing projects on underutilized sites within
the Downtown Specific Plan area and consider
feasibility of City /MRA acquisition of selected sites.
(MRA & CD)
7. Install improved street lighting on designated downtown
residential streets. (MRA & PW)
8. Prepare amendment to Moorpark Redevelopment Plan and
related ballot measure to reestablish eminent domain
authority. (MRA, CA & CC)
9. Acquire site and construct mini -park within Downtown
Specific Plan area. (MRA & CS)
10. Acquire property and prepare conceptual development
plan for expansion of Poindexter Park. (CS)
** 11. Prepare General Plan Amendment for Land Use Element and
zoning Code modification for the affordable housing
4
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
F(LF'a /%O' ""
la '✓ �,.:d6..r.
site as part of the West Pointe Homes / William Lyon
Homes Development Agreement. (CD)
12. Complete update of Redevelopment Implementation Plan
for 1999 -2004 and prepare draft Implementation Plan for
2004 -2009. (MRA)
13. Prepare report on health and longevity of High Street
pepper trees and related maintenance and replacement
plan for City Council consideration by December 31,
2003. (CS)
14. Design and construct electrical system for decorative
lighting on High Street. (MRA & PW)
15. Evaluate options for improving security at the
Metrolink parking lots including surveillance cameras
and extending block wall at south property line west of
Bard Street and make selected improvements by June 30,
2004. (CS & PD)
C. Improve traffic circulation and mitigate impacts on the
movement of traffic through the City.
** 1. Work with Caltrans to complete a number of projects
including: (PW)
** a) Obtain Caltrans approval for construction of a
raised median on Los Angeles Avenue /New Los
Angeles Avenue from west city limits to SR 23
Freeway.
** b) Installation of a traffic signal interconnect
system and permissive /restrictive left turns at
certain intersections to provide improved signal
coordination and traffic flow on New Los Angeles
Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue;
** c) Construct the Los Angeles Avenue at Beltramo Road
widening project;
** d) Complete design and acquire right -of -way to widen
Los Angeles Avenue between Spring Road and
Moorpark Avenue.
2. Complete report on the Citywide Traffic Mitigation fee
and develop more precise information on the proposed
east /west route that addresses local issues, including
retention of consultant for an implementation plan
pertaining to the level of improvement required to
5
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
'.. •...+ red {.,d J7
serve as an east /west transportation corridor, cost,
funding alternatives, and plan for phased
implementation. (CD & PW)
3. Construct traffic signal interconnect system on Tierra
Rejada Road from Los Angeles Avenue to SR 23 Freeway to
possibly include use of permissive /protected left turns
at certain intersections (PW).
** 4. Acquire right -of -way and improve Los Angeles Avenue
(East) from Condor Drive west to 1,500 feet east of
Spring Road. (PW)
5. Install bus benches and shelters at selected City bus
stops. (CS)
** 6. Work with VCTC, CHP, Caltrans, and County of Ventura to
site a permanent truck scale facility west of the City.
(PW & ACM)
7. Monitor Caltrans' efforts to develop improvement plan
for widening of SR 118 west of Moorpark City limits
including proposed improvements at the SR 118 and SR
34 /Donlon Road intersection. (PW)
8. Design the modification, improvement, and widening of
the rail crossings at Spring Road and at Moorpark
Avenue. (PW)
** 9. Complete construction of street realignment and
signalization at the intersection of Flinn Avenue,
Second Street and Spring Road. (PW)
** 10. Proceed with the development of the design and
acquisition of additional right -of -way necessary to
provide two southbound lanes on Moorpark Avenue (SR 23)
between Casey Road and Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118).
(PW & CD)
** 11. Coordinate efforts of various developers to construct
improvements to Walnut Canyon Road (SR 23) from Casey
Road to north City limits to provide lane widening,
paved shoulders, and striped median. (CD & PW)
12. Complete report on alternative road alignments for SR
23 between Broadway and Los Angeles Avenue. (CD, PW &
CE)
6
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
13. Amend General Plan Circulation Element to include High
Street west of Moorpark Avenue (SR 23) as a local
collector street. (CD)
14. Install two additional radar speed display signs with
one on Tierra Rejada Road and one on Campus Park Drive.
(PW)
D. Strengthen the City's fiscal stability and long -range
financial growth.
** 1. Develop proposed Business License Program for
consideration by the City Council. (AS)
** 2. Prepare a City marketing brochure and related materials
for business attraction and retention. (MRA)
3. Revise park land dedication ordinance and evaluate
adequacy of current parks improvements fee for
commercial and industrial development. (CS, CD & AS)
4. Submit the seven -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
for City Council's consideration by December 31, 2003.
(PW)
** 5. Complete a comprehensive fee study for development
related fees for consistency with current direct and
indirect costs. (AS)
6. Implement Cost Recovery Program for Code Enforcement.
(CD & AS)
** 7. Develop improved cost and time accounting addressing
when to use flat fee amounts instead of deposits for
planning and engineering fees and develop real time
billing rates for all departments. (AS & CD)
8. Develop plan for expenditure of Traffic Systems
Management monies collected from development projects
for improvement of air quality. (CD & CS)
9. Develop an equitable basis for requirement on new
development projects to provide Affordable Housing
units and /or pay in lieu fees and for calculating the
amount of Traffic Systems Management (TSM) fees. (CD,
MRA & AS)
7
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
10. Implement an electronic imaging system fee to be paid
prior to or concurrently with building permit issuance
to pay the City's costs for scanning approved building
permits and plans. (CD & CC)
** 11. Complete efforts to implement GASB 34 requirements to
record infrastructure as capital assets and modify
annual financial reports to include a government -wide
component. (AS, PW & CS)
** 12. Evaluate potential uses for parcels deeded to City by
SDI. (ACM)
** 13. Conduct citywide mail ballot to seek increase in
assessments for street lighting and landscaping. (PW &
CS)
** 14. Develop a fee program for businesses requiring
inspection to insure NPDES compliance. (PW & AS)
** 15. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a fee on all
building permits for new construction to assist with
funding updates of General Plan elements. (CD & AS)
** 16. Complete a commercial demand study to determine
appropriate range of commercial acreage for city at
build out for City Council consideration by October 31,
2003. (CD)
** 17. Conduct a comprehensive analysis of Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency finance projections, including
cash flow and bonding capacity. (MRA)
E. Reduce the potential for juvenile crime through intervention
and prevention efforts.
1. Develop a Youth Master Plan in collaboration with the
various agencies that serve Moorpark youth, including
MUSD and Moorpark Boys and Girls Club, and interested
residents to identify existing needs, services and
programs. (CS)
2. Work with community groups and school district to
address violence intervention and drug use among
teenagers. (PD & CS)
0
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
',✓ t6 r,.d X1.1
3. Determine a location and construct a permanent
skatepark. (CS)
F. Enhance the delivery of services and expand program
efficiencies.
1. Coordinate City's efforts for proposed transfer of
Waterworks District No. 1 to the City. (CM)
** 2. Develop conceptual design proposal for new City Hall,
council chambers, and other government offices and
complete necessary property acquisition. (ACM)
3. Complete construction of Arroyo Vista Community Park
Phase II and evaluate feasibility of regular vehicular
use of the pedestrian bridge. (CS & PW)
4. Complete standard development project conditions of
approval used for each type of entitlement. (CD)
5. Update and revise the Subdivision Ordinance for City
Council consideration and adoption by December 31,
2003. (CD, CA & CE)
6. Complete a policy and procedures manual for code
enforcement activities. (CD)
7. Complete a Citing Procedures Ordinance making any
violation of a City Ordinance subject to an
administrative fine or penalty for City Council
consideration and adoption by December 31, 2003. (CD &
CA)
8. Complete Guidelines for Preparation of Landscape and
Irrigation Plans. (CD)
9. Prepare an Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual
and revise Purchasing Ordinance and related procedures.
(AS)
** 10. Complete negotiation of cable television franchise
renewals with Adelphia for City Council consideration
by December 31, 2003. (ACM)
11. Evaluate the feasibility of on -line park reservations
and registration for recreation programs. (CS & AS)
0
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
12. Consider options for funding construction and
maintenance of a community aquatic facility. (CS)
** 13. In conjunction with other agencies, coordinate
preparation of the conceptual plan, design and
financing plan and construction of the Moorpark Human
Services Complex for the provision of health and social
services to the residents of Moorpark. (MRA)
14. Evaluate City's law enforcement needs and priorities
and related allocation of resources including future
utilization and focus of the current 5th Grade D.A.R.E.
position. (CM & PD)
** 15. Develop final design for police station including space
for California Highway Patrol offices and initiate
construction. (ACM & PD)
16. Determine feasibility and cost for electrical generator
to serve Arroyo Vista Recreation Center. (CS)
17. Update City's Record Retention Schedule to conform to
federal and state law and prepare for increased
destruction of paper records. (CC)
** 18. Develop final design for a new Corporate Yard for the
Public Works and Community Services maintenance
functions and initiate construction. (PW & CS)
19. Construct a play lot and half court basketball court at
Villa Campesina Park. (CS)
20. Install new playground equipment in both play lot areas
at Mountain Meadows Park. (CS)
21. Complete initial phase of GIS application. (AS)
22. Construct a canine park. (CS)
23. Evaluate feasibility of using a contractor to perform a
citywide canvassing for animal licensing. (CS)
24. Evaluate feasibility of in -house processing of parking
citations. (PW & AS)
10
s: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
25. Evaluate feasibility of constructing a second point of
egress for the south Metrolink parking lot. (CS, PW &
MRA)
26. Develop guidelines and procedures implementing a Youth
Scholarship Program for eligible low income
participants in city recreation programs. (CS)
27. Construct restroom at Glenwood Park. (CS)
G. Reinforce and enhance Moorpark's attractive community
character and safeguard its desirable resources.
1. Work with Ventura County Fire Prevention District to
consider siting a fire station in the Campus Park area
of the City. (ACM)
2. Plan and conduct an emergency response exercise
involving the City Council and a simulated emergency
response drill and update City's SEMS Multi Hazard
Functional Plan (Emergency Plan) and improve
communication capabilities of the City's EOC. (ACM &
PD)
3. Develop Ordinances and related policies and program
guidelines for collection and use of Art in Public
Places and Tree and Landscape fees. (CS & CD)
** 4. Complete the update of the OSCAR Element of the General
Plan, the related GPA and environmental documentation
and the Park Master Plan. (CD & CS)
** 5. Develop options to enhance open space and greenbelt
areas for consideration by the City Council. (CM & CD)
** 6. Process General Plan amendment and Zoning Code
amendment to create a Natural Open Space land use
designation and zone district as initiated by City
Council in 1995. (CD)
7. Prepare a Business Recovery Plan. (AS)
** 8. Develop affordable housing assistance programs in
conjunction with residential development projects in
the City and develop a program for affordable housing
assistance projects utilizing redevelopment set aside
11
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
Ap FA A e�
funds and other available funding sources to increase
the affordable housing stock in Moorpark. (MRA)
9. Work with State of California to achieve appropriate
reuse of former Caltrans yard including widening of Los
Angeles Avenue. (CD & MRA)
10. Develop plan and conceptual design for City entry
signs. (PW, CS & CD)
** 11. Initiate comprehensive update to General Plan Land Use
and Circulation Elements and insure internal
consistency among all General Plan Elements. (CD)
12. Consider amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to allow
greater use of a variety of residential development
concepts to ensure optimum open space and recreation
amenities while achieving appropriate densities. (CD)
13. Establish design standards for commercial, industrial,
and residential development projects. (CD)
14. Complete landscaping improvements on south side of Los
Angeles Avenue east of Tierra Rejada Road. (PW & CS)
** 15. Conduct study to determine feasibility of establishing
a trail system along the Arroyo Simi through the City
and east to connect to trail system in Simi Valley.
(PW & CD)
16. Process amendments to City Zoning Ordinance including
parking, entitlements, signage and second dwelling
units. (CD)
17. Analyze feasibility and if feasible, prepare policy and
standards requiring installation of a photovoltaic
system for residential projects for consideration by
Planning Commission and City Council by December 31,
2003. (CD)
18. Implement activities to celebrate City's 20th
anniversary of incorporation. (CS)
19. Initiate Tree Lighting Ceremony community event in
conjunction with the Metrolink Santa Train program.
(CS)
12
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
20. Process proposed North Park Specific Plan and related
environmental document, GPA, Zone Change, development
agreement, sphere of influence amendment and annexation
for City Council consideration. (CD, CM & CC)
21. Install landscaping in the Tierra Rejada Road median
from Spring Road to easterly city limits. (PW & CS)
22. Update city's 1995 Master Drainage Plan and incorporate
needed improvements into Capital Improvement Program.
(PW & CD)
23. Prepare Specific Plan for the Virginia Colony area of
city. (CD)
24. Establish Underground Utility District to underground
electrical transmission lines on Los Angeles Avenue (SR
118) from Shasta Avenue to Millard Street. (PW)
** 25. Develop an inventory of natural open space properties
owned by City and HOA's and other privately owned
property restricted by conservation easement or other
development condition or limitation. (CD & CS)
26. Work with Caltrans to install landscaping and
decorative pavement at Tierra Rejada Road /SR 23 ramps.
(PW & CS)
** 27. As part of new City Hall project, establish Civic Hall
of Fame to recognize city enhancement efforts by
individuals and organizations. (ACM)
13
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Objectives 2003 -2004 Final 0618 2003.doc
'� d/# vt.d L3
' — al 0 w4d
Potential Objectives
1. Conduct a community -wide surve,
of satisfaction residents feel
develop a program to regularly
and feedback regarding service
continue to implement a system
requests and complaints.
r to measure the level
about City services,
solicit public input
satisfaction, and
to track customer
2. Tape a minimum of two (2) special City- sponsored
events or meetings for replay supporting public
information and community promotion efforts and
evaluate the feasibility of taping a video about
Moorpark City government.
3. Implement Neighborhood Preservation Program.
4. Conduct an Organization and Management Study and
prepare an implementation plan.
5. Analyze potential for franchising of telephone
services providers that provide cable television
services.
6. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a teen center.
7. Apply for "Tree City U.S.A." designation after
adoption of Amended Tree Ordinance.
8. Evaluate feasibility of lighting additional parks and
recreation facilities including Arroyo Vista Community
Park (AVCP) multi - purpose court and second softball
field, two basketball courts at Mountain Meadows Park,
and proposed skatepark.
9. Install winter holiday decorations on street light
poles at various locations in the City.
10. Adopt formal traffic policies.
11. Install a compressed natural gas (CNG) pumping station
for City and public use in Moorpark.
12. Conduct an Arbor Day event.
13. Utility undergrounding projects including Tierra
Rejada Road from Spring Road to easterly city limits.
Q D 0--� . ,f *4'- q
14. Rental Inspection Ordinance.
15. Expand Arroyo Vista Recreation Center and gym.
16. Work with property owner to improve west City entry.
17. Develop plan for recreational use of detention basin
in Specific Plan No. 1.
18. Electronic message sign.
19. Install traffic signal at eastbound SR 118 Collins
Drive /Los Angeles Avenue off ramp.
20. Work with Historical Society on finalizing a site for
its proposed facility.
21. Develop policies for Arts in Public Places
expenditures.
22. Develop guidelines for fine and cultural arts
expenditures.
23. Landscaping improvements and signage for Arroyo Vista
Community Park entry.
24. Landscape north side of Poindexter Avenue from Gabbert
Road east to vicinity of Chaparral School.
25. Establish apricot orchard at one or more locations for
community's historical purposes.
26. Evaluate feasibility of establishing a publicly owned,
privately operated equestrian center.
27. Develop program to assist City employees as first -time
buyers to purchase housing in the City.
28. Consider feasibility of pedestrian bridge on Los
Angeles Avenue (SR 118) in vicinity of Moorpark
Avenue.
29. Consider feasibility of pedestrian bridge over
Poindexter Avenue and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
from Specific Plan No. 1.
a� F a .4
30. Upgrade Community Center kitchen facilities.
31. Construct a second lighted basketball court at College
View Park.
32. Develop recommendations for public art at Arroyo Vista
Recreation Center and College View Park.
33. Evaluate feasibility and cost for modifying traffic
signal pedestrian crossing devices for use by vision
impaired and physically disabled persons as well as
upgrading to include time display.
34. Evaluate feasibility of landscaping remaining portion
of Monte Vista Nature Park and adjacent properties
with native vegetation.
35. Evaluate feasibility of relocating the Metrolink
layover facility.
S: \City Manager \Everyone \ccagenda \Potential Objectives FY 2003 -04 to HCC 0618
2003.doc
�.. ✓ w+ �. raw