Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2003 0820 CC REGResolution No. 2003 -2110 Ordinance No. 295 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2003 7:00 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Recognition of Deputy Jeffrey Manory, D.A.R.E Officer. B. Recognition of Deputy Amy Viard, Moorpark High School Resource Officer. C. Recognition of Outgoing Teen Council Members. D. City Manager's Monthly Report. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presenta� ion/Act ion/ Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Puii' -ic Hearing or Presentations /Action. /Discussion item must do so during the P::blic !-Tearing or Presentations /Ac;. ion/Discuss ion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards muses be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of ::n.e Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion por::on of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement- Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally `or open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action / Discussior. _tems. Cooies of each item of business on the agenda are on file n the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any q .1est:ons concerning any agenda ir.em may be directed -.o the City Clerk at 517--62 23. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 2 S. PUBLIC COMMENT: (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING, UNLESS CANCELED.) 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.8, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, Zone Change No. 2003 -01, Tentative Tract Map No 5405, and Residential Planned Development _Permit No. 2003 -01, for Seventeen (17) Affordable Single - Family Housing Units on a 3.15 Acre Site Located West of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately One -Half Mile North of Casey Road on the Application of William Lyon Homes. Staff Recommendation: ecommedation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- , approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01 subject to Conditions of Approval; and 4) Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading to amend the zoning of the project site, and schedule second reading and adoption for September 3, 2003. (Staff: Barry Hogan) B. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment_ No. 2003 -01, Deleting Chapter 5.88 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Regarding Home Occupations, Boutique _Sales, and Garage Sales and Amending Chapter 17.28.020(B) Regarding Home Occupations and Garage Sales. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01, and schedule second reading and adoption for September 17, 2003. (Staff: Barry Hogan) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) C. Consider_ Amendments to Chapters 17.20 (Uses by Zone) , 17.28 (Standards for Specific Uses), 17.44 (Entitlement - Process and Procedures), 17.60 (Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code) and 17.68 (Public Notice) . Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -05, and schedule second reading and adoption for September 3, 2003. (Staff: Barry Hogan) D. Reconsideration of Condition of Approval for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -01 (GreeneWay) _Related to Left -Turns at the Spring Road Driveway, on the Initiation of City Council. Staff Recommendation: Affirm the Conditions of Approval that were adopted on June 4, 2003, utilizing Design Option 3. Should the City Council wish to amend Special Condition of Approval No. 11 related to the left turn movements, direction could be given to the Community Development Director to process a Permit Adjustment. (Staff: David Bobardt) 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Teen Council Appointments. Staff Recommendation: Make a minimum of seven and a maximum of eleven appointments to the Teen Council for a one - year term to end on June 30, 2004. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) B. Consider Appointment of Two City Representatives to the Ventura County Area Housing Authority (AHA) . Staff Recommendation: Appoint two City representatives to the Ventura County AHA for a four - year term ending August 31, 2007. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 4 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (continued) C. Consider Cost Reduction Alternative for the Corporation Yard Project. Staff Recommendation: Approve the preliminary design for Construction Option 'A' (masonry construction with covered parking), with the deletion of Change Item B (portion of wrought iron fencing) and the inclusion of Change Item A (cover for perimeter parking /storage areas) as a Bid Add Alternate. (Staff: Kenneth Gilbert) 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 1, 2002. Consider Approval of _Minutes of _Regular Meeting of August 21, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 7, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 18, 2003 Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 2, 2003. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Warrant _Register. for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - August 20, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant 113264 & 113266 - 113270 & 113401 - 113403 & 113406 & 113583 - 113586 113043 $ 843,694.67 $ (95.00) Regular Warrants 113271 - 113379 & $1,299,066.26 113407 - 113498 & $ 481,305.54 113682 - 113701 $ 205,270.65 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 5 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) C. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 - August 20, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant 113259 - 113263 & 113265 & 113404 - 113405 & 113582 113192 & 113063 & 113383 & 113438 $ 211,795.13 $ (1,923.42) Payroll Liability 113396 - 113400 & $ 2,600.16 Warrants 113577 - 113581 & $ 2,595.84 113590 - 113594 $ 2,570.53 Regular Warrants 113380 - 113395 & $ 18,800.22 113499 - 113576 & $ 166,416.23 113595 - 113681 $1,677,221.01 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. D. Consider Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003 -04, a Request to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (in Addition to Beer and Wine) in Conjunction with Food Service at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse, 11800 Championship_ Drive, on the Application of Moorpark Country Club (Toll Brothers, Inc.). (Continued from July 2, 2003) Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003- (Staff: Barry Hogan) E. Consider Flinn Avenue Driveway. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the conceptual plan for converting Old Flinn into an alley (driveway) and authorize staff to design and construct the improvements required to implement this plan; and 2) Direct staff to provide a response to Mr. Scribner, respectfully declining his offer to acquire the property in question. (Staff: Kenneth Gilbert) F. Consider_ Rescinding Agreement Between the City of Moorpark and MSE Environmental, Inc. for Regular Monthly Household Hazardous Waste Event Participation. Staff Recommendation: Rescind the Agreement approved on January 16, 2002. (Staff: John Brand) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 6 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) G. Consider Waiver of Police Facility and Landscape Fees for the Ventura County Fire Protection District Station 42 Project. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the fee waiver and refund the Police Facility Fee and Landscape Fee in the total amount of $4,330.75 to the Ventura County Fire Protection District. (Staff: Hugh Riley) H. Consider Right -of -Way Acquisition on Grimes Canyon Road and on Spring Road North of New Los Angeles Avenue. Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of -way and related property rights required for the construction of the projects described in the agenda report; and 2) Authorize the City Clerk to accept and record any such documents. (Staff: Kenneth Gilbert) I. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing_ the Submittal of a Ventura County Area Agency on Aging Grant Application for Older Americans Act Title III -D Funds for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services_ at Senior Centers and Authorizing City Manager to Sign All Related Agreements. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 - (Staff: John Hartnett) J. Consider Resolution Authorizing the City's Fiscal Year 2003/20_04 Transportation_ Development Act (TDA) Claim. Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- , authorizing the FY 2003/2004 TDA claim for the City of Moorpark; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to sign the claim for submittal to the Ventura County Transportation Commission. (Staff: John Brand) K. Consider Addendum to the Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) -East Cooperative Agreement, and Cost Allocations. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the Addendum funding VISTA -East for Fiscal Year 2003/2004, subject to final language approval by the City Manager; and 2) Authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. (Staff: John Brand) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 7 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) L. Consider Rejection of Claim: SBC. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) M. Consider Thousand Oaks Cab Ride Rate Increase. Staff the new Thousand Oaks Ca flag drop and $2.10 per 2003; and 2) Authorize t h and execute an addendum (Staff: John Brand) Company Request for Dial -A- Recommendation: 1) Approve Cab Company rate of $2.10 per mile effective September 1, e City Manager to finalize to the City's Agreement. N. Consider Transfer of Ownership_ of Coach USA (CUSA). Staff Recommendation: Approve the transfer of the Agreement for Maintenance and Operation of Moorpark City Transit to CUSA, LLC. (Staff: John Brand) O. Consider Authorizing the Community Development Director to Extend the Time on a Temporary Use Permit for a Temporary Equipment Storage Yard Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue Between Maureen Lane and Leta Yancy Road on the Property Known as the Pacific Communities Site (Val _Verde Construction, Applicant). Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Community Development Director to extend the life of the Temporary Use Permit for Val Verde Construction for the construction yard for a total of ten months or to the end of the water line construction project in the City, whichever occurs later. (Staff: Barry Hogan) P. Consider Final Map Approval for Tract Map No. 4928 -3 (Toll Brothers). Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and the City Clerk to cause Tract Map 4928 -3 to be recorded in the office of the Ventura County Recorder. (Staff: Walter Brown) 11. ORDINANCES: None. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 8 12. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE 14ITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 511 -0- 090 -340, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and the Margaret Irene Gisler Cullen Trust Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998 E. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Administrative Services Director, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, and Public Works Director. F. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Unrepresented employees: Accountant I, Administrative Services Director, Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, Budget and Finance Manager, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, Information Systems Manager, Planning Manager, Principal Planner, Public Works Director, Recreation Manager, and Senior Management Analyst. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2003 Page 9 13. ADJOURNMENT: In ccmp.iarne with the Americans wiL'n Disabilities Act, if you reed assistance to participat.e is this meeting, please conLacL the city ierk's Department at (80:)) X17-6223. Not;f'_catior. 48 `»ucs prig- to the meeting •a'.11 enable the c ty tc make eeaso .ble arrangements to ensure acces�ibi it.y to Lf:is m ?et:ng ;28 CFP 35.102 35.104; t,..A Tttle 11). NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING A duly noticed public hearing regarding: Consider Amendments to Chapters 17.20 (Uses by Zone), 17.28 (Standards for Specific Uses), 17.44 (Entitlement - Process and Procedures), 17.60 (Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code) and 17.68 (Public Notice). was held on August 20, 2003, at which time the City Council continued the open public hearing to the City Council meeting to be held on September 3, 2003, at 7:00 p.m., in the Community Center located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. Dated: August 21, 2003 Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA } ss CITY OF MOORPARK ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Maureen Benson, declare as follows: That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that a Notice of Continuance of Open Public Hearing regarding: Consider Amendments to Chapters 17.20 (Uses by Zone), 17.28 (Standards for Specific Uses), 17.44 (Entitlement - Process and Procedures), 17.60 (Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code) and 17.68 (Public Notice). continued from August 20, 2003, to September 3, 2003, was posted on August 21, 2003, at a conspicuous location near the place of the meeting: Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 21, 2003. Maureen Benson Deputy City Clerk MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Prepared By: Scott Wolfe, ITEM Y • A. Development Direct Principal Plann DATE: July 30, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, Zone Change No. 2003 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01, for Seventeen (17) Affordable Single - Family Housing Units on a 3.15 Acre Site Located West of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately One -Half Mile North of Casey Road. Applicant: William Lyon Homes (APN: 500 -0- 270 -050) BACKGROUND On February 6, 2002, the City Council approved a 250 lot single - family residential subdivision (Tentative Tract Map No. 5187) on approximately 350 acres, located on the west side of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one half mile north of Casey Road. The City and applicant entered into a Development Agreement for the project that required twenty (20) affordable housing units. Later in 2002, William Lyon Homes acquired the project. On January 14, 2003, William Lyon Homes submitted an application to build seventeen (17) of the required affordable units within a small portion of the original project and a property adjacent to the southeast corner of the original project. Section 6.11 of the Development Agreement (Attachment 6) spells out the conditions under which the affordable units will be constructed and offered for sale. That section also provides that should less than twenty (20) units be achieved, the developer is to pay to the City Seventy- Thousand Dollars ($70,000) (to be adjusted annually per the Consumer Price Index) for each unit less than the required twenty (20). S: \Corr- munity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Agenda Rp --S \cc agenda report.coc Cr — " —;.w Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 On July 2, 2003, the Planning Commission considered this request, and recommended approval of this project to the City Council. A copy of the agenda report to the Planning Commission and Planning Commission Resolution are attached. The requested entitlements include: General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, to amend the land use designation of the site from Rural Low Residential and Open Space -1 to High Density Residential; Zone Change No. 2003 -01, to change the zoning of the site from Rural Exclusive 5 -Acre (RE -5ac) and Open Space (OS) to Residential Planned Development 7 Units /Acre (RPD -7u); Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, to subdivide the site into seventeen (17) single - family residential lots and three (3) lots for landscape areas; and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01, to construct seventeen (17) affordable single- family houses. DISCUSSION The subject property is situated at the south east corner of Tract 5187, a 250 unit subdivision also being developed by William Lyon Homes. The project will consist of 17 single family detached units affordable to buyers in the Moderate, Low and Very Low Income Levels. Two house plans are proposed: a 1,270 square foot four bedroom /two bathroom unit, and a 1,495 square foot four bedroom /two and one half bathroom unit. The units are very typical of small lot subdivision homes, and would be constructed with materials of the same quality as the market - rate homes with wood frame and stucco construction and tile roofs. Architectural decor, such as vent covers, shutters, pot shelves, and other window articulation will be used on the front elevations of all the units, as well as on rear and side elevations which face Walnut Canyon Road. The units will be served with a public street, which will enter the site from Walnut Canyon Road. The street will be wide enough to allow for parking, but off - street parking is provided both in the unit two car garages as well as on the driveways, where a minimum 18 -foot long driveway will accommodate two vehicles. The Planning Commission suggested the re- plotting of the units on lots 4 through 8 to maximize the side yard areas to create more usable space for the residents. The applicant has made the suggested changes. The homes will be situated only slightly above the Walnut Canyon Road street grade at the north end of the project, while at the Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 3 south end, the homes will sit about 5 feet above the street grade. A stepped retaining wall and landscape planter area will separate the homes from Walnut Canyon Road and break up the vertical dimension of the perimeter wall along the back of the homes. As the site slopes steeply up the west, a retaining wall will be needed to create enough pad area to provide required setbacks for the houses. This retaining wall will run along the west side of the project and will vary in height behind the homes on lots 1 through 6, reaching a maximum of 25 feet. This wall will also mark the rear property lines of the lots and will serve as the tract perimeter as well. The wall is proposed to be constructed using a technique called soil nailing, which will provide stable retention of the slope, and allow for decorative treatment to resemble natural stone. A photographic example of the soil nailing wall is included in the exhibit booklet which accompanies this report. Though the wall will be treated in this fashion, potential exists for visual impact from Walnut Canyon. To avoid this impact, Lot C, the biofiltration area along the southern boundary of the project, will be heavily landscaped with trees and shrubs to screen and soften the view of the wall from Walnut Canyon Road. The landscaping within Lot C, as well as within the landscape planters along Walnut Canyon Road (Lots A & B) are recommended by the Planning Commission to be maintained by a future Landscape Maintenance District. This will ensure that the screening and softening value of the landscaping will be adequately preserved after the project is occupied. STAFF RECO14MENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2003- , adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01 subject to Conditions of Approval. 4. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading to amend the zoning of the project site, and set September 3, 2003, for second reading. Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Agenda Report (with Project Exhibits and Mitigated Negative Declaration) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 (see City Council Resolutions and Ordinance for exhibits). 3. Draft Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approving General Plan Amendment No. 2003- 01. 4. Draft Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01. 5. Draft Ordinance Approving Zone Change 2003 -01. 6. Section 6.11 of Development Agreement 2001 -01. MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Prepared by Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner DATE: June 25, 2003 (PC Meeting of 7/1/03) SUBJECT: Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, Zone Change No. 2003 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01, for Seventeen (17) Affordable Single - Family Housing Units on a 2.5 Acre Site Located West of Walnut Canyon Road, Approximately One -Half Mile North of Casey Road. Applicant: William Lyon Homes (APN: 500 -0- 270 -050) BACKGROUND On February 6, 2002, the City Council approved a 250 lot single - family residential subdivision (Tentative Tract Map No. 5187) on approximately 350 acres, located on the west side of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one half mile north of Casey Road. The City and applicant entered into a Development Agreement for the project that required twenty (20) affordable housing units. Later in 2002, William Lyon Homes acquired the project. On January 14, 2003, William Lyon Homes submitted an application to build seventeen (17) of the required affordable units within a small portion of the original project and a property adjacent to the southeast corner of the original project. The lots are proposed to be developed with four (4) bedroom homes priced to be affordable to families in the Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income ranges. The requested entitlements include: General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, to amend the land use designation of the site from Rural Low Residential and Open Space -1 to High Density Residential; Zone Change No. 2003 -01, to change the zoning of the site from Rural Exclusive 5 -Acre (RE -5ac) and Open Space (OS) to Residential Planned Development 7 Units /Acre (RPD -7u); Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, to subdivide the site into seventeen (17) single - family residential lots and three (3) lots for landscape areas; and CC ATTACHMENT 1 S:\Corrmunity Development \DEV PMTS \R P 1)\2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Agenda Rpts \PC Agenda Report.doc Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 2 Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01, to construct seventeen (17) affordable single - family houses. DISCUSSION Project Setting Existing Site Conditions: The subject property consists of 2.5 acres of land, with 1.66 acres adjacent to Tentative Tract Map No. 5187, and an additional 0.84 acres from land designated for open space within Tract 5187. The parcel runs generally north -south along the west side of Walnut Canyon Road. The center portion of the lot has been graded level, while the west side rises steeply into an area of Tract 5187, and the east side of the parcel drops sharply into a stream channel. Street access to the lot is from Walnut Canyon Road and is currently at the south end of the parcel. The site is currently vacant and is fenced and posted to prevent trespassing. It appears to have been unused for some time. The ground has been disturbed, and vegetation on -site includes a variety of native and non - native plants. On -site trees include pine, olive, eucalyptus, palm, pepper, fig, tamarisk, oak, walnut and sycamore. The stream channel is heavily overgrown with trees and brush, which screens the site from Walnut Canyon Road. Previous Applications: None on file. GENERAL, PLAN /ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site RL, OS -1 RE -5Ac, OS Vacant Vacant North ML RPD -1.8U South M RE Residences (SFD) East OS -1 OS Vacant West OS -1 OS Vacant General Plan and Zonina Consistencv: The subject site is currently designated Rural Low Residential (RL) and Open Space (OS -1) on the City's General Plan Land Use Element Map. The RL designation permits residential development with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres. The OS -1 designation is given to land with natural development constraints, such as topography, and permits a density of one dwelling per ten (10) to forty (40) C,st.�rzf. Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 3 acres. The zoning designation for the property is Rural Exclusive, 5 -acre minimum lot size (RE -5Ac) and Open Space (OS), 10 -acre minimum lot size. The designations are much too restrictive to allow the project that is proposed. Therefore, an amendment to the General Plan land use designation and zoning is requested to increase the allowable density on the project site. The proposed density of the project will-be 6.8 units per acre. This will require that the Land Use designation be changed to High Density Residential (H), which allows development at up to 7.0 units per acre. The zoning will need to be changed to be consistent with the Land Use Designation as well. A zoning designation of Residential Planned Development - 7 units per acre (RPD -7U) is proposed to accommodate this project. Properties on all sides of the subject site either contain uses more intense than the five (5) acre minimum lot size restriction of the current designation, or are approved for such uses. The application of the existing designation no longer appears appropriate, especially because the size of the project site is less than five (5) acres. In addition, the General Plan Housing Element identifies a need for affordable housing within the City. In efforts to meet the need identified in the Housing Element, the City has required new residential projects to include a plan for the provision of affordable units, either within the project area, or at an off -site location to be acquired and developed by the developer. The subject project is in direct response to this requirement of the City. The General Plan acknowledges that changes to the Land Use designations may be required in order to meet specific goals of the various elements. This is an instance where the ability to achieve a Housing Element objective justifies the amendment of the Land Use Map. Project Summary Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 (Residential Lots): Parcel No. Size (acres) Size (sq. ft.) 1 0.12 5,252 2 0.09 3,722 3 0.09 3,809 4 0.08 3,300 5 0.09 3,783 6 0.10 4,290 7 0.09 4,110 8 0.08 3, 597 9 0.11 4,777 Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 4 Parcel No. Size (acres) Size (sq. ft.) 10 0.09 3,888 11 0.07 2,907 12 0.07 2,895 13 0.07 2,964 14 0.07 2,913 15 0.07 2,927 16 0.07 2,928 17 0.10 4,327 Total 1.46 62,389 Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01: Parcel Proposed Use Building Area (sq. ft.) 1 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 2 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 3 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 4 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 5 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 6 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 7 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 8 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 9 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 10 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 11 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 12 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 13 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 14 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 15 Single Family Detached Residence 1,495 sf 1 6 Single Family Detached Residence 1,270 sf 17 Single Family Detached Residence--T 1,495 sf Proposed Project Architecture: The architecture proposed in the units is typical of small -lot single family homes. The homes would be one of two plans: Plan 1, which is a 4 bedroom /2 bath home at 1,270 square feet, and Plan 2, which is a 4 bedroom /2.5 bath home at 1,495 square feet. Both plans are two story homes, and have the same basic footprint, approximately 25' by 45'. In most cases, the narrow elevation is the 'front" elevation facing the street. However, in the case of Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 5 lots 1, 2, and 3, the houses are turned so that the wide elevation is facing the front lot line. The houses are proposed to be of wood frame and stucco construction with tile roofs. Decorative components such as window articulation, shutters, pot shelves, and vent covers are proposed to add interest to the elevations. These components will be placed on side and rear elevations where the sides and rears are visible to Walnut Canyon Road. Setbacks: The applicant has proposed standard residential setbacks, which are met or exceeded in the proposed design, except for front yard setbacks for lots 1, 2 and 3. The side yard setbacks are a minimum of five feet (5'), although wider setbacks are proposed, particularly on the west side of "A" Street. Rear yard setbacks meet or exceed the fifteen foot minimum required by the Municipal Code. Five (5) lots at the northern end of the tract exceed the rear yard setback minimums by as much as fourteen feet (14'). In order to reduce the conflict of driveway aprons in close proximity to each other, the applicant has proposed a "meandering" five -foot (5') wide sidewalk, which goes behind the driveway apron for each lot, outside of the public street right -of -way. A minimum eighteen -foot (18') setback is provided between the back of the sidewalk and the front of the garage for each residential unit. A condition of approval has been added that requires a 5 -foot (5') parkway adjacent to the curb and a 5 -foot (5') sidewalk adjacent to the parkway, except in the cul -de -sac area where not parkway is required. The precise design will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. Although an eighteen -foot (18') setback has been provided for the driveways on lots 1, 2 and 3, the front yard setbacks for the structures are somewhat less. A condition of approval has been added that requires a minimum front yard setback of ten feet (10') for lots 1, 2 and 3, with allowance for a maximum five -foot (5') encroachment into the setback for the entry porch. Circulation: Access to and from the site will be from Walnut Canyon Road, toward the northern end of the parcel. The project will result in the construction of a cul -de -sac with a bulb radius of forty feet (40') which will meet City standards and be dedicated as a public street. This street will provide adequate access to the homes by the residents, their guests, service deliveries, and emergency c Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 6 vehicles. The intersection of "A" Street with Walnut Canyon Road has been designed to meet both the City standards as well as Caltrans standards. Parking: Primary parking for each residence will be in the garages, which will meet the City standard for two parking spaces. Additionally, each unit's driveway has been designed to be a minimum of eighteen feet (18') deep from the back of the proposed sidewalk, enabling two cars to park in the driveway. Finally, limited on- street parking is available, with the potential to provide approximately one on street space for per each residential unit. Landscaping: The site has been previously disturbed, with much of the vegetation on -site being non - native. Nearly all of the on -site vegetation will be removed to construct the proposed project. Thirty seven trees were identified as being slated for removal by the arborist's tree report for this project. Conditions have been incorporated to address the impacts associated with these removals and ensure compliance with the Municipal Code requirements regarding the removal of mature trees. The landscaping on the site following construction would be typical of residential subdivisions, with additional area for planting along the eastern perimeter of the tract in a landscape planter along Walnut Canyon Road. Additionally, turf and other landscaping is proposed within the NPDES biofiltration area at the south end of the project. Site Improvements and National Pollution Discharge Elimination Standards Requirements ( NPDES): The City Engineer has recommended conditions to provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain improvements including the imposition of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) requirements. "Passive" Best Management Practices drainage facilities would be required so that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Air Quality: According to the 2000 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, the proposed project will produce 6 pounds of NOX, which is not in excess of allowable 25 pound threshold, providing a conclusion that there will be no impact on regional air quality. Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 7 ANALYSIS Issues Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the following areas for Planning Commission consideration in their recommendation to the City Council: • Maintenance of Landscapin • Noise Levels alona Walnut Canvon Road • Height and Appearance of Retaining Wall /Nailed Slope Behind Lots 1 through 6 Maintenance of Landscaping: It is likely that many if not all of the residents in this development will be first -time buyers. In order to ensure that landscaping is maintained on the individual lots, in the absence of a homeowner's association, special conditions have been added to ensure that landscaping will be provided with automatic irrigation for the entire lot. In addition to the seventeen (17) residential lots, three (3) other lettered lots (A, B & C) are proposed. Lots A and B are created to accommodate landscape buffers along Walnut Canyon Road. These lots are five feet (5') wide and would be situated between a small retaining wall and the tract perimeter wall of the residences. A portion of Lot C is situated at the far southern end of the subdivision and will contain the biofiltration system through which the street storm water will drain on its way to the storm drain system. The remainder of Lot C contains the slope along the western side of the project. These lots serve an important purpose within the tract, but cannot be included on an individual homeowner's property due to maintenance requirements, which must be met in order for them to function as proposed. As there will be no Homeowner's Association for this tract, it is not feasible to designate these parcels as common area. The applicant proposes to place the western slope above and to the south of lots 1 through 6 within the maintenance responsibility of Tract 5187. The rest of lot C and lots A & B are proposed to be included within a Landscape Maintenance District to ensure perpetual proper maintenance. This solution will require the processing of a lot line adjustment or a map amendment for Tract 5187. A revision to Tract No. 5187 and /or a lot line adjustment will be required in any event in order to include the 0.84 acre parcel from Tract No. 5187. A condition has been added that Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 8 requires that the maintenance of landscape and slope areas be accommodated through the Homeowner's Association for Tract No. 5187 or a Landscape Maintenance District to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. Noise Levels along Walnut Canvon Road: Walnut Canyon Road is a major thoroughfare, with large traffic volumes including considerable numbers of large trucks, particularly during peak hours. Noise levels around this type of highway are generally higher than levels considered acceptable. The outside maximum limit of acceptability for residential development is 65 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalency Level, average sound energy levels in decibels in a 24 -hour period, weighted to account for sensitivity to sound at different frequencies and hours of the day), while the indoor maximum limit of acceptability in a residential dwelling is 45 CNEL. The rear yards of the homes adjacent to Walnut Canyon Road would experience noise levels in excess of the 65 CNEL, but the construction of the six -foot (61) high - perimeter wall along the property line separating the homes from the roadway will mitigate the impact to levels below 65 CNEL. Indoor noise levels will need to be mitigated through the use of specific noise reducing construction techniques, such as dual -paned glass, wall insulation, and the orientation of vents to avoid the transmission of noise. A Special Condition of Approval has been included to address this potential impact. Height and Appearance of Retaining Wall /Nailed Slope Behind Lots 1 through 6: A major concern in the design of this project is the provision of rear yards for lots 1 through 6. These rear yards have are provided through the construction of a retaining wall which will vary in height, exceeding twenty -five feet (25') in height in places. This would allow for a fifteen -foot deep rear yard. The applicant has been responsive to staff's concern about the visibility of the wall from Walnut Canyon Road. Staff has reviewed the site plans and has determined that the wall will only be minimally visible from Walnut Canyon Road, with the most likely vantage point being from the northbound lane approaching the project. The placement of the homes on either side of "A" Street, along with the grade differential between the base of the wall and the surface of Walnut Canyon Road will serve to screen the wall from view. Additional screening will emerge as landscaping throughout the project matures. The applicant is also investigating an alternative to retaining walls called soil nailing. This technique involves drilling and .i v w1V Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 9 driving "nails" deep into the exposed slope as excavation occurs. These nails are then grouted in place and connected together with either a concrete cover or a steel mesh which will stabilize the slope. The advantage to this type of stabilization method is that the slope can be laid back somewhat so as to avoid the "enclosed" feeling of being in a fifteen foot rear yard between a twenty seven foot house and a twenty foot wall. Laying the slope back can help to open the perception of space. In addition to increasing the perception of space, this technique can also add more area to the rear yards, allowing more usable space between the house and the slope. The concern of staff in the use of the soil nailing technique is the ability to soften the visual impact of the stabilization. While it allows the slope to be laid back more than a retaining wall, this will result in a larger area impacted. While planting within the mesh to screen it is being investigated, there will likely be some limitations due to the avoidance of irrigation on the slope. Staff finds that this alternative may have merit, but needs further study. A condition of approval has been added to allow either a retaining wall or soil nailing to be used at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. Findings The following findings are offered pursuant to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act: 1. The proposed map would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. 2. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that all City Development standards would be met by the proposed project. Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 10 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that all potential impacts would be mitigated through project design or conditions. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that easements for the widening of Walnut Canyon Road have been identified and incorporated in the design of this project. 8. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. 9. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir as defined in California Government Code Section 66478.1 et seq. The following findings are offered for the Residential Planned Development Permit: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed project will advance the objectives of the General Plan Housing Element, and the proposed zoning designation will be consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use designation. 2. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development, in that the surrounding development will include a variety of single - family detached homes. 3. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the use proposed is similar to uses existing or proposed to the north, south, and west, and access to or utility of those adjacent uses are not hindered by this project. 4. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that adequate provision of public access, sanitary services, and Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 11 emergency services have been ensured in the processing of this request. 5. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located, in that the existing and planned land uses in the general area are generally single family detached residential uses. The nearby Waterworks District facility is isolated from this project and will neither affect, nor be adversely affected by, this development. 6. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character, in that the proposed project complies with all development standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and the development will utilize high quality architectural materials and treatments to enhance the visual appeal of the structures to be constructed. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). However, in this case, there are legislative acts (General Plan Amendment and Zone Change) being considered in conjunction with the entitlements. Therefore, there are no time limits for processing under the abovementioned statutes so long as the entire package presented is acted upon at one time. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Honorable Planning Commission July 1, 2003 Page 12 Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation can not be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has prepared or supervised the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the potential significant impacts of this project. Based upon the Initial Study, the Director has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment and has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Commission review and consideration before making a recommendation on the project. STAFF RECOWMNDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, Zone Change No. 2003 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Tentative Tract Map 3. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 4. Draft PC Resolution with Conditions of Approval C � "�'� '/ ' —'S e E-1 z U 4 E♦ E U a LL Ir. .t rrtir Nil nq OCIN!TY' .VAF E-4 r-A ...... .. ... 04 �2 -r.. 314 A.0 C)l� vAj LC I I. 1,'4ll C- (I 3 rArl 'ORU, or 401 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF MOORPARK 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6200 The following Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Moorpark. Public Review Period: June 27 to July 28, 2003 Project Title /Case No.: General Plan Amendment 2003 -01, Zone Change 2003 -01, TTM 5405, RPD 2003 -01 Project Location: West side of Walnut Canyon Road, % Mile north of Casey Road, Moorpark, Ventura County. (Location Map Attached) Project Description: Amend General Plan Designation from RL (Rural Low Residential) to H(High Density Residential); Amend zoning designation from RE -5Ac (Rural Exclusive — 5 Acre Minimum Lot size) to RPD -7U (Residential Planned Development — 7 units per acre); Approve Tract 5405 and RPD2003 -01 to subdivide 2.5 acres into 17 lots, and construct 17 single family detached units. Project Type: Project Applicant X Private Project Public Project William Lyon Homes 23975 Park Sorrento, Suite 220 Calabasas, CA 91302 (818) 222 -1188 Finding: After preparing an Initial Study for the above - referenced project, it is found that there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City of Moorpark, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. However, this effect can be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the imposition of mitigation measures which have been incorporated into the project. (Initial Study Attached) Responsible Agencies: Caltrans, Department of Fish and Game Trustee Agencies: None Attachments: Location Map Initial Study Contact Person: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Community Development Department City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California, 93021 (805) 517 -6236 PC ATTACHMENT 3 S XCommumty Development\DEV PMTSIR P D%20031 -01 Wm Lyon\Env\MND.doc Project Location: West side of Walnut Canyon Road, % Mile north of Casey Road General Plan Designation: RL (Rural Low Residential) Zoning: RE -5Ac (Rural Exclusive -5 acre minimum lot size) Project Description: Amend General Plan Designation from RL (Rural Low Residential) to H (High Density Residential); Amend zoning designation from RE -5Ac (Rural Exclusive — 5 Acre Minimum Lot size) to RPD -7U (Residential Planned Development — 7 units per acre); Approve Tract 5405 and RPD 2003 -01 to subdivide 2.5 acres into 17 lots, and construct 17 single family detached units. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Vacant (Approved Tract 5187) South: Existing Residential Neighborhood East: County Waterworks District facility West: Vacant (Approved Tract 5187) Responsible and Trustee Agencies: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a Potentially Si nificant Impact" or Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated, "as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. X Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality X Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources X Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportationfrraffic Utilities /Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance None DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. Mitigation measures described on the attached Exhibit 1 have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared by: Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner Reviewed it Date: INITIAL STUDY EXHIBIT 1: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM If deemed necessary by the noise study, a sound wall shall be constructed along the eastern property lines of the lots abutting Walnut Canyon Road; In order to screen the wall, a 5 wide planter is provided between the wall and Walnut Canyon Road. This planter will be planted with trees, shrubs, and vines to screen the wall. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 2. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 inch gypsum board, 3.5 inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 3 5 R Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility. Department of Community Development All second story windows along Walnut Canyon Road shall be Milgard type 5120 double glazed window assemblies, or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 8 through 17 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, and sill) with interlocking or tube type compression weather stripping, or an effective equivalent. Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development All exterior vents on the homes on Lots 8 through 17 shall be directed away from Walnut Canyon Road in order to reduce noise transmissions into the house through vents and ducts. ► r� ., -�,,� 2 Monitoring Action: Physical Inspection Timing: Prior to Occupancy of Units Responsibility: Department of Community Development 7. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any required mitigation imposed as a result of these permits shall be complied with. Monitoring Action: Applicant to provide proof of permit issuance Timing: Prior to issuance of grading permits Responsibility: Department of Community Development The applicant shall replace trees on the site in an amount equal to the appraised value of the removed trees, as identified in the Tree Report dated December 2002. Should there not be sufficient space to replace the required trees, or should appropriate trees not be available, the applicant shall pay to the City of Moorpark an amount equal to the difference between the appraised amount and the value of the trees planted on site. Monitoring Action: City Landscape Consultant to review project plans for compliance Timing: Prior to issuance of occupancy Responsibility: Department of Community Development AGREEMENT TO PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6), this agreement must be signed prior to release of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for public review. I, THE UNDERSIGNED PROJECT APPLICANT, HEREBY AGREE TO MODIFY THE PROJECT DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE ABOVE - LISTED MITIGATION MEASURES IN THE PROJECT. Signature of Project Applicant Date 3 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The project proposes to construct a retaining wall along the rear property lines of lots 1 through 6. This wall will reach a maximum height of 25 feet and will be visible from off -site particularly when traveling north on Walnut Canyon Road. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: Lot C will be planted with trees and shrubs, and to screen the wall from view from Walnut Canyon Road. B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application, 3 Mitigation: None Required. 4, Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact A. AESTHETICS — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X 2) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but X not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 3) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The project proposes to construct a retaining wall along the rear property lines of lots 1 through 6. This wall will reach a maximum height of 25 feet and will be visible from off -site particularly when traveling north on Walnut Canyon Road. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: Lot C will be planted with trees and shrubs, and to screen the wall from view from Walnut Canyon Road. B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application, 3 Mitigation: None Required. 4, Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact C. AIR QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable x air quality plan? 2) Violate any air quality standard or contribute x substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant x concentrations? 5) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Response: This project does not exceed the Air Quality Resources threshold of significance of 25 pounds per day of ROC or NOx. Sources: 7 Mitigation: None required. D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors. or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 5 x X 5) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 6) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact X X Response: 2./3. This project proposes changes land which has been heavily disturbed, so most of the biological resources have already been severely degraded. However, there is a stream channel running along the eastern edge of the property which will be filled to accommodate development. This work falls within the jurisdictional area of both the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Army Corps of Engineers. A condition has placed on the project that seven (7) native walnut trees removed as a result of the project will be replaced at a 10:1 ratio. This replacement ratio will meet Department of Fish and Game requirements and mitigate project impacts. 5. This project requires the removal of mature trees, both native and non- native from the site, and will require mitigation in accordance with the City's Mature Tree Protection Ordinance. Sources: Site Plan, Project Application, 8 Mitigation: 2./3. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any required mitigation imposed as a result of these permits shall be complied with. 5. The applicant shall replace trees on the site in an amount equal to the appraised value of the removed trees, as identified in the Tree Report dated December 2002. Should there not be sufficient space to replace the required trees, or should appropriate trees not be available, the applicant shall pay to the City of Moorpark an amount equal to the difference between the appraised amount and the value of the trees planted on site. E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource as defined in §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 0 X X X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact impac Response: This project proposes changes on previously developed land, and therefore is not expected to impact cultural resources. Sources'. Site Plan, Project Application Mitigation: None required. F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: 1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death Involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? 2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? x X x X x x x x Response: This project is not within Alquist Priolo Special Studies areas, and does not have any soils or geological impacts. Sources: 3, Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle, Seismic Hazard Zone Map, Moorpark Quadrangle. Mitigation: None Required. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 7 B) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: There are no known hazards on the project site. Sources: 3 Mitigation: None Required. H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? 2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact 1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or. X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 7) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? B) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: There are no known hazards on the project site. Sources: 3 Mitigation: None Required. H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? 2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or 8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? 9) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss. X injury or death involving i) flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ii) inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Response: This project will result in the alteration of natural flows across the site. However, these flows will be directed to appropriate storm drain facilities prior to leaving the site, and therefore will not reflect a significant impact. Sources'. Project plans. Mitigation: None Required. 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: I Physically divide an established community? X 2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? EVAN f9�� 9 4 J Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact IT Pact or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 4) Substantially atter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? 5) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 6) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X 7) Place housing within a f 00 -year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? 9) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss. X injury or death involving i) flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ii) inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Response: This project will result in the alteration of natural flows across the site. However, these flows will be directed to appropriate storm drain facilities prior to leaving the site, and therefore will not reflect a significant impact. Sources'. Project plans. Mitigation: None Required. 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: I Physically divide an established community? X 2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? EVAN f9�� 9 4 J Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitioation Impact impact Response: While this project deviates from the current General Plan Land Use element map designation with regard to density on the subject site, the project would help meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element and is consistent with all other General Plan Goals and Policies. Further, this project includes a General Plan Amendment which will ensure that the project is consistent with the Land Use Element map as well. Therefore, this impact is not significant. Sources: 3,4 Mitigation: None Required J. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 2) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Response: This project will not affect mineral resources. Sources: n/a Mitigation: None Required. K. NOISE — Would the project result in: 1) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 2) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? 3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 4) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Im act Miti ation Impact Im act the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Response: 1) Ambient noise levels within the project area along Walnut Canyon Road are expected to exceed 65 CNEL . 4)Temporary increases in ambient noise levels can be expected during construction periods. However, City regulations pertaining to hours of construction will ensure that this impact is less than significant. Sources: 1,3,4 Mitigation: 1) Installation of perimeter walls along Walnut Canyon Road, with sound wall installation as determined necessary by noise study. See mitigation monitoring program for further details. 4) None required . L. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: 1) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly ( for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ( for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 2) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Response: This project will have a beneficial impact of helping to achieve housing goals in support of the Housing Element of the General Plan. Sources: 3 Mitigation: None required. M. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Schools? x Parks? x Other public facilities? x Response: While some incremental impact on public services is to be expected, the impacts are not significant. Sources: Site Plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. N. RECREATION 1) Would the project increase the use of existing x neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 2) Does the project include recreational facilities or require x the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the G11V11 V.-1 111' Response: This project will have no impact on recreational resources. Sources: Project plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. O. TRANS PORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 2) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? A) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X X X X C 12 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant Impact Mitigation Impact 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g.. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact X x X Response: This project will have no impacts on transportation facilities or traffic patterns. Sources: Site Plans, Project Description Mitigation: None required. P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: 1) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 2) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X X x x 5) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment x provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 6) Be served by the landfill with sufficient permitted capacity x to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 7) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Response: This project proposes the diversion of flows to existing or proposed storm drain facilities. This improvement will be engineered to accommodate anticipated flows, and therefore does not reflect a significant impact. Sources: Project Plans Mitigation: None required X Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehistory? 2) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, X but cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effect of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and effects of probable future projects)? 3) Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Response: Mitigation measures will be impose that will enable the project to reduce any potential impacts to a less -than significant level. Sources: 1,3,4 Earlier Environmental Documents Used in the Preparation of this Initial Study None. Additional Project References Used to Prepare This Initial Study One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and are available for review in the Community Development Office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Items used are referred to by number in the Response Section of the Initial Study Checklist. Traffic Noise Study Report for the Colmer Residential Department dated March 14, 2001. 2. Comments received from (departments) in response to the Community Development Department's request for comments. 3. The City of Moorpark's General Plan, as amended. 4. The Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended. 14 �„ `' "°3 �� JV 5. The City of Moorpark Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 92 -872 6. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Section 15000 et. seq. 7. Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 14, 2000. 8. Tree Report for William Lyon Homes Affordable Housing, Moorpark, December 2002. 15 .. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -448 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -01, ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -01, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2003 -01 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5405 ON 2.5 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED WEST OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF MILE NORTH OF CASEY ROAD, ON THE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 500 -0- 270 -050) WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, to amend the land use designation of the subject site from Rural Low Residential to High Density Residential; Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to change the zoning of the site from Rural Exclusive 5 -Acre (RE -5ac) to Residential Planned Development 7 Units /Acre (RPD -7u); Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, to subdivide the site into seventeen (17) single- family residential lots and three (3) landscape lots; and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01, to construct seventeen (17) affordable single- family housing units, on a 2.5 Acre site located west of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one -half mile north of Casey Road. (Assessor Parcel No. 500 -0- 270 -050); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read, reviewed, and considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared on behalf of the proposed seventeen (17) single - family housing unit project referenced above. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: CC ATTACHMENT 2 Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 Page 2 A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed project will advance the objectives of the General Plan Housing Element, and the proposed zoning designation will be consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use designation. B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development, in that both the proposed project and the surrounding development will include a variety of single family detached homes. C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the use proposed is similar to uses existing or proposed to the north, south, and west, and access to or utility of those adjacent uses are not hindered by this project. D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that adequate provision of public access, sanitary services, and emergency services have been ensured in the processing of this request. E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located, in that the existing and planned lard uses in the general area are generally single family detached residential uses. The nearby Waterworks District facility is isolated from this project and will neither affect, nor be adversely affected by, this development. F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character, in that the proposed project complies with all development standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and the development will utilize high quality architectural materials and treatments to enhance the visual appeal of the structures to be constructed. SECTION 2. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT FINDINGS: Based on the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying maps and studies the Planning Commission has determined that the Tentative Tract Map, with imposition of the attached special and standard Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements for S: \Community Development \ADMIN \CO,4MISSION \Final Reso \pc 448 rpd 2003 -01 WmLyons.doc i �v Je.iAJ Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 Page 3 approval of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: A. The proposed map would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. B. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003- 01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that all City Development standards would be met by the proposed project. E. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that all potential impacts would be mitigated through project design or conditions. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that easements for the widening of Walnut Canyon Road have been identified and incorporated in the design of this project. H. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. I. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir as defined in California Government Code Section 66478.1 et seq. S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSIGN \Final Reso \pc 448 rpd 2003 -01 WmLyons.doc p� r� i•. N " '.i �/ J V • Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 Page 4 SECTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: A. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 per Exhibit A. B. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 2003 -01 per Exhibit B. C. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit C (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. D. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01 subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit D (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Lauletta, Pozza, Vice Chair DiCecco and Chair Landis NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioner Peskay S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \Final Reso \pc 448 rpd 2003 -01 WmLyons.doc Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 Page 5 PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of July, 2003. Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment Map Exhibit B: Zone Change Map Exhibit C: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 Exhibit D: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01 S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \Final Reso \pc 448 rpd 2003 -01 WmLyons.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -01, FOR A CHANGE OF LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RURAL LOW (RL) RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE -1 (OS -1) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H), AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON 3.15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF MILE NORTH OF CASEY ROAD, ON THE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 500 -0- 270 -050) WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 recommending approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01, to amend the land use designation of the subject site from Rural Low Residential and Open Space -1 to High Density Residential on a 3.15 acre site located west of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one -half mile north of Casey Road; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2003, the City Council considered the agenda report for General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the proposed Mitigated for the project referenced above. has read, reviewed, and Negative Declaration prepared NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the project are complete and have been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. B. The City Council has considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a decision concerning the project and the Negative Declaration. CC ATTACHMENT 3 C � � � Resolution No. 2003 - Page 2 C. The Mitigation Measures of this project have been incorporated into the project conditions of the accompanying Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development. D. The City Council's approval of the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration represents an independent action based upon the City Council's independent judgment. SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION: The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with General Plan Amendment 2003 -01, Zone Change 2003 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 and Residential Planned Development No. 2003 -01 is hereby adopted. SECTION 3. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: General Plan Amendment 2003 -01 is approved, amending the General Plan Land Use Map as proposed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A - General Plan Amendment Map A In i ♦ !"9. T A S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -31 Am = ,yon \Raso- Cond \cc resolution gpa.doc C*" -1—T -_n.. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 3 EXHIBIT A GPA 2003 -01 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT MAP , r,% .> m t S: \Ccmunity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm mayor. \Reso- Cond \cc resolution gpa.doc " �`� RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5405 AND RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2003 -01 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF SEVENTEEN (17) RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVENTEEN (17) SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AFFORDABLE UNITS ON 3.15 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED WEST OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF MILE NORTH OF CASEY ROAD, ON THE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 500 -0- 270 -050) WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 recommending approval to the City Council of Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 and Residential Planned Development No. 2003 -01, for the subdivision of seventeen (17) residential lots and 3 lots for landscape and slope maintenance purposes; and the construction of seventeen (17) affordable single family detached homes on a 3.15 acre site located west of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one -half mile north of Casey Road; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2003, the City Council considered the agenda report for Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 and Residential Planned Development No. 2003 -01 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read, reviewed considered, and adopted the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project referenced above. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the Planning Commission makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: CC ATTACHMENT 4 �.�.0 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 2 A. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed project will advance the objectives of the General Plan Housing Element, and the proposed zoning designation will be consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use designation. B. The proposed project is compatible with the character of surrounding development, in that both the proposed project and the surrounding development will include a variety of single family detached homes. C. The proposed project would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses, in that the use proposed is similar to uses existing or proposed to the north, south, and west, and access to or utility of those adjacent uses are not hindered by this project. D. The proposed project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, in that adequate provision of public access, sanitary services, and emergency services have been ensured in the processing of this request. E. The proposed project is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located, in that the existing and planned land uses in the general area are generally single family detached residential uses. The nearby Waterworks District facility is isolated from this project and will neither affect, nor be adversely affected by, this development. F. The proposed project is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure (s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character, in that the proposed project complies with all development standards of the Moorpark Municipal Code, and the development will utilize high quality architectural materials and treatments to enhance the visual appeal of the structures to be constructed. SECTION 2. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT FINDINGS: Based on the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying maps and studies the Planning Commission has determined that the Tentative Tract Map, with imposition of the attached special and standard Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements for S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution r pd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 3 approval of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: A. The proposed map would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan and Zoning Ordinance if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003 -01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. B. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision would be consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan if amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2003- 01 and Zone Change No. 2003 -01 to allow for a density up to 7.0 units per acre. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site can be engineered to allow for all required utilities to be brought to the site, adequate ingress and egress can be obtained, and the site can be provided with public and emergency services. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that all City Development standards would be met by the proposed project. E. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, in that all potential impacts would be mitigated through project design or conditions. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that adequate sanitation is both feasible and required as a condition of this development. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that easements for the widening of Walnut Canyon Road have been identified and incorporated in the design of this project. H. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. I. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir as defined in California Government Code Section 66478.1 et seq. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc \�w� Resolution No. 2003 - Page 4 SECTION 3. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -01, subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 Exhibit B: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01 S: \Community Development \DEV PM'1'S \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wrn Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc lrn,n s� a( /�� Resolution No. 2003 - Page 5 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 5405 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to or concurrently with the approval of the Final Map, the westerly tract boundary shall be revised to reflect the boundary as shown on the Tentative Tract Map No. 5405. This amendment shall take place through a lot line adjustment or by amendment to Tract 5187, or other method acceptable to the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all required permits from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Any required mitigation imposed as a result of these permits shall be complied with. 3. Prior to the approval of a Final Map for this subdivision the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement between the City of Moorpark and the Applicant. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be consistent with the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval of Resolution No. 2002 -1938 approving Tentative Tract Map 5187. 4. The Final Map shall show the ultimate right -of -way for "A" Street to include a five (5) foot wide curbside parkway and a five (5) foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the parkway on both sides of the street. At the cul -de -sac bulb between lot 1 and lot 17, the sidewalk may abut the curb with no parkway. Final design of the right -of -way improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and City Engineer. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. For compliance with the following conditions contact the Planning Division of the Community Development Department: 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Tract Map and all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies at the time of S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyor. \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 6 tentative map approval supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map. 2. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation which references conditions of approval shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 3. This Tentative Tract Map shall expire three (3) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one (1) year extensions for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made in writing, at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date of this approval. 4. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding S: \Cocrmunity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Re so- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 7 unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. 5. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. The approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is included as an attachment to the approving resolution, and all mitigation measures are requirements of the Tentative Tract Map and Residential Planned Development Permit, as applicable. 6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. All mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring Report and Program (MMRP) are hereby adopted as requirements of the Tentative Map, as applicable. Where conflict or duplication between the MMRP and the conditions of approval occurs and applicability for compliance is questioned by the subdivder, the Community Development Director shall determine the applicable condition compliance requirements for each phase of development. 8. Prior to Approval of the Final Map, the subdivider shall submit to the Department of Community Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report which clearly states all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 9. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the subdivder shall pay to the City a fee for the image conversion of the final map and improvement plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, into an electronic imaging format acceptable to the City Clerk. 10. The Applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all applicable City legal service fees within sixty (60) days of approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The Applicant, permittee, or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the Tentative Map. S:\Community Developmerit \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution = pd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 8 11. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading, Applicant shall submit a complete Landscape Plan, together with specifications and a separate Maintenance Plan. The Landscape Plan shall encompass all areas required to be planted consistent with these conditions of approval. The Landscape Plan shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect Consultant and approved by the Community Development Director prior to Zoning Clearance for grading permit, or first Final Map approval, whichever occurs first. All of the following Landscape Plan and inspection requirements shall be complied with: a. Prior to initial review of the landscape plans, the Applicant shall deposit funds for plan review in an amount specified by the Community Development Director. The Applicant shall deposit additional funds upon request as needed to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. Any deposit balance remaining following final approval of the installation shall be refunded to the Applicant. b. All plant material shall conform to the current issue of the American Standard for Nursery Stock published by the American Association of Nurserymen. C. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant's landscape architect shall provide written certification to the City, stating that the installation is in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plans. d. Prior to final inspection by the City of Moorpark, the Applicant shall provide a written certification for the operation of the backflow device. e. All backflow preventers, transformers, and other above -grade utilities shall be appropriately screened with walls and /or plantings. f. The planting and irrigation design shall comply with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. g. Prior to occupancy, the landscape installation shall be approved by the Community Development Director. This approval shall be based upon written certification of the landscape installation by the City Landscape Consultant. S: \Community Developmer.•t \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -Ol Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc �� Resolution No. 2003 - Page 9 h. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specifications for front yard landscaping for all residences. Front yard landscaping shall be installed as determined by the Residential Planned Development Permit for all lots in this project as reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to final inspection and release of utilities. 12. Provisions requiring that ultra -low water consumption plumbing fixtures shall be installed consistent with City Ordinance No. 132. The project shall also include a requirement for the following energy saving devices or construction features: a. Stoves, ovens, and ranges, when gas fueled shall not have continuous burning pilot lights. b. All thermostats connected to the main space- heating source shall have night setback features. C. Kitchen ventilation system shall have automatic dampers to ensure closure when not in use. 13. A fencing, perimeter, gate, and privacy barrier wall plan, complete with related landscaping details, identifying the materials to be used and proposed wall heights and locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for grading. All fences /walls along lot boundaries shall be in place prior to occupancy of each lot, unless timing for installation is otherwise stated in these conditions. Where applicable prior to approval of the final fence /wall plan, the Community Development Director shall approve the connection of property line wall with existing fences and or walls on adjacent residential properties. The Developer is required at his /her sole expense to connect or reconstruct adjacent residential walls and or fences to the project perimeter wall utilizing the same type of material that comprises existing walls and or fences that are to be connected to the project perimeter wall. 14. The Developer shall submit fence /wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director. S: \Corununity Development \DEV FMT S \R F D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 10 15. The final design and location of all walls and fences, streetscape elements, urban landscaping are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 16. Prior to Final Map approval, the Applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City any easements required for the City to access and maintain any landscaped areas or drainage improvements outside of the public right - of -way, which have been designated to be maintained by the City. 17. Prior to Final Map approval for any phase, the Applicant shall also provide to the City a signed Petition /Waiver a) requesting formation of an Assessment District to fund future costs for the maintenance of any landscaping and /or drainage facilities designated to be maintained by the City, and b) waiving all rights conferred by Proposition 218 with regard to the right to protest any such assessments. Said Petition and Waiver shall include, as an Exhibit, an Engineer's Report fully setting forth a description of the assessment district and the assessments, consistent with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code. Said report shall be prepared by a consultant to be retained by the City. The Applicant shall pay to the City a $5,000 advance to fund the cost of the Engineer's Report. In the event it is determined that there will be no landscaping or extraordinary drainage improvements to be maintained by the City, the Community Development Director may waive this condition with the concurrence of the City Manager. 18. Prior to Final Map approval, the City Council shall determine which areas shall be maintained by a maintenance assessment district. 19. Within two (2) days after the City Council adoption of a resolution approving this project, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark a check for a single fee of $1,250.00 plus a $25.00 filing fee payable to the County of Ventura, to comply with Assembly Bill 3158, for the management and protection of Statewide Fish and Wildlife Trust Resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21089, and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, the project is not operative, vested or final until the filing fees are paid. 20. The applicant shall pay to the City capital improvement, development, and processing fees at the rate and amount in S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 lim Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 11 effect at the time the fee is required to be paid. Said fees shall include but not be limited to Library Facilities Fees, Police Facilities Fees, Fire Facilities Fees, entitlement processing fees, and plan check and permit fees for buildings and public improvements. Further, unless specifically exempted by City Council, the applicant is subject to all fees imposed by City as of the issuance of the first permit for construction and such future fees imposed as determined by City in its sole discretion so long as said fee is imposed on similarly situated properties. 21. During construction, the applicant shall allow all persons holding a valid cable television franchise issued by the City of Moorpark ( "Cable Franchisees ") to install any equipment or infrastructure (including conduit, power supplies, and switching equipment) necessary to provide Franchisee's services to all parcels and lots in the Project. The applicant shall provide notice of its construction schedule to all Cable Franchisees sufficiently in advance of construction to allow the Cable Franchisees to coordinate installation of their equipment and infrastructure with that schedule. City shall provide the applicant a list of Cable Franchisees upon the applicant's request. 22. The initial sales price, location of the affordable units, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, respective role of the City and the Developer, and any other item determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in an Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the first Final Map for this project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with Tract 5405 conditions of approval and the Development Agreement. 23. Prior to approval of Zoning Clearance for residential unit building permit, the subdivider shall pay fees in accordance with Section 8297 -4 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Parks and Recreation Facilities). S : \Co:nm,inity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Atli i,r- Resolution No. 2003 - Page 12 B. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the City Engineer: General Conditions: 24. The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all site improvements within the development and offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. 25. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No. 3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 26. If hazardous materials are found on the site, the Developer shall stop all work and notify the City immediately. The Developer shall develop a plan that meets City, State and Federal requirements for its disposal. 27. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department Waterworks District No. 1. 28. All existing and proposed utilities shall be under grounded as approved by the City Engineer. This also includes all existing above ground power lines adjacent to the project site that are less than 67Kv. 29. Prior to improvement plan approval, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Fire Prevention Division and obtain the approval of the location of fire hydrants. 30. The applicant shall provide all easements and rights -of -way granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 31. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate S: \Community Development \DE:V PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lycr. \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 13 Agencies. Copies of these approved permits shall be provided to the City Engineer. 32. Prior to the approval of Final Map the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department and the City Engineer for review a current title report, which clearly states all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 33. Any mapping that requires review and approval by the County of Ventura shall be concurrently submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The applicant shall be responsible for all associated fees and review costs. 34. The Final Map shall be prepared by a California Registered Engineer meeting all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. 35. Any lot -to -lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easement shall be delineated on the Final Map. Assurance in the form of an agreement shall be provided to the City that these easements shall be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. Said agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall include provisions for the owners association to maintain any private storm drain or National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, hereinafter NPDES system not maintained by a City Assessment District and shall be a durable agreement that is binding upon each future property owner of each lot. 36. On the Final Map, the applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark all rights -of -way for public streets. 37. Prior to submittal of the Final Map for review and approval, the applicant shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written evidence of compliance shall be submitted to the City Engineer. 38. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties shall not be allowed without mitigation. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 WIn Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc A in 7-- '—, Resolution No. 2003 - Page 14 39. ROC, NOx and dust during construction grading will be suppressed by the following activities: a. The fuel injection of all diesel engines used in construction equipment should be retarded two degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation. b. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use high - pressure injectors. C. All diesel engines used in construction equipment should use reformulated diesel fuel. d. Construction grading shall be discontinued on days forecasted for first stage ozone alerts (concentration of 0.20 ppm) as indicated at the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District air quality monitoring station closest to the City of Moorpark. Grading and excavation operations shall not resume until the first stage smog alert expires. e. All clearing and grading activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 miles per hour averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. f. All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h. Facilities shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. i. Large -scale construction vehicles and trucks exiting the project site during the mass grading period shall be required to have tire wash -downs to minimize the dispersion of dust onto local streets. 40. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the project Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as deemed necessary: S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso - Cord \cc resolution rpd.dcc N-, -,e �, v Resolution No. 2003 - Page 15 a. Minimize removal of existing vegetation. b. Provide temporary soil cover, such as hydroseeding, jute blankets, mulch /binder and erosion control blankets, to protect exposed soil from wind and rain. c. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities. e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale, earth, and sandbag dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure during the October through April rainy season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. 41. To minimize the water quality effects of permanent erosion sources, the following design features shall be incorporated into the project - grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading plan to verify compliance with Best Management Practices features including, but not limited to the following: a. Drainage swales, subsurface drains, slope drains, storm drain inlet /outlet protection, and sediment traps. b. Check dams to reduce flow velocities. C. Permanent desilting basins. d. Permanent vegetation, including grass -lined swales. e. Design of drainage courses and storm drain outlets to reduce scour. 42. The following measures shall be implemented during all construction activities throughout build out of the project to minimize the impacts of project- related noise in the vicinity of the proposed project site: a. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, and b) 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday. Construction work on Saturdays will require payment of a premium for City inspection services and may be further restricted or prohibited should be City S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 WM Lyor. \Reso- cond \cc resolution rpd.doc: Resolution No. 2003 - Page 16 receive complaints from adjacent property owners. No construction work is to be done on Sundays and City observed holidays pursuant to Section 15.26.010 of the Municipal Code. b. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimized through establishing hauling routes that avoid residential areas and requiring that `Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan must be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. C. The Developer shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. d. Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. e. Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise shielded from existing surrounding rural residential neighborhoods. f. Property owners and residents located within 600 feet of the project site, shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The project developer shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Department. g. A construction effects program shall be prepared and submitted to the City after completion and occupancy of the first phase of project build out. This program shall protect, to the degree feasible, new residents from the impacts of sustained construction. 43. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with the approved Tentative Map, prepared by a Registered Civil S: \Corunur.ity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 17 Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 44. The final grading plan shall meet all UBC and City of Moorpark standards including slope setback requirements at lot lines, streets and adjacent to offsite lots. 45. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a sediment and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas within 30 days of completion of grading unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 46. This project is projected to import soils onsite. Import /export operations requiring an excess of 100 total truckloads or 1,000 cubic yards of material shall require City Council approval prior to the commencement of hauling or staged grading operations. A haul route is to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Additional surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets shall be required as directed by the City Engineer. 47. All requests for staged grading shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for review and approval by the City Council. 48. Temporary irrigation, hydroseeding and erosion control measures shall be implemented on all temporary grading. Temporary grading is defined to be any grading partially completed and any disturbance of existing natural conditions due to construction activity. These measures will apply to a temporary or permanent grading activity that remains or is anticipated to remain unfinished or undisturbed in its altered condition for a period of time greater than thirty (30) days except that during the rainy season these measures will be implemented immediately. 49. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope inclination except where special circumstances exist. In the case of special circumstances where steeper slopes are warranted a certified soil engineer will review plans and their recommendations will be subject to the review and S: \Corrmunity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso - Cord \cc resolution rpd.doc a,r, 'r�.f'. ^ Resolution No. 2003 - Page 18 approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. 50. All graded slopes shall be planted in a timely manner with groundcover, trees and shrubs that will stabilize slopes and minimize erosion. The planting will be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 51. So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately 18 inches high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding 4 feet in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The applicant shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. The City Engineer and Community Development Director shall approve all material for the construction of the wall. 52. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the Developer shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits will be provided to the City Engineer. 53. During site preparation and construction, the applicant shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. 54. During smog season (May - October) the City shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 55. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Engineer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 56. The applicant shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized S: \Commznity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 nm Lycn \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 19 persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. 57. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4 -inch fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 58. Soil testing for trench compaction shall be performed on all trenching and shall be done not less than once every 2 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of trench excavated. Test locations shall be noted using street stationing with offsets from street centerlines. 59. All vehicles in the construction area shall observe a 15- mile per hour speed limit for the construction area at all times. 60. During site preparation and construction, the applicant shall construct temporary storm water diversion structures per City of Moorpark standards. 61. The entire site shall be graded at the same time. Pads shall be graded, planted and landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 62. Prior to submittal of grading plans the applicant shall have a geotechnical report prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 63. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all habitable structures shall be designed to current UBC requirements or the City approved geotechnical report requirements for the project, whichever standard is most restrictive. 64. Prior to issuance of a building permit, an as- graded geotechnical report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. 65. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771 the street improvement plans shall provide for a surveyor's statement on the plans, certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or will be protected in place during construction. 66. Monuments shall meet the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura Standards and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 67. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction for each residential unit, the applicant shall S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resoluticn rpd.doc nib r.�A Resolution No. 2003 - Page 20 make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fund of $1,444.00 per residential unit to fund TSM programs or clean -fuel vehicles programs as determined by the City. Commencing on January 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 68. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each residential unit, Developer shall pay City a traffic mitigation fee as described herein ( "Citywide Traffic Fee "). The Citywide Traffic Fee may be expended by the City in its sole and unfettered discretion. On the approval date of this resolution the amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be Four - Thousand - Three - Hundred - Eighty -Nine Dollars ($4,389) per residential unit. Commencing January 1, 2004, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. 69. The applicant shall contribute to the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee Program. The Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fee shall be paid in accordance with City Council adopted AOC fee requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. The AOC Fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of Zoning Clearance for each building permit. 70. Prior to or concurrently with the Final Map and prior to any construction for Walnut Canyon Road an encroachment permit shall be obtained from Caltrans. Any additional S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc l.i •�� U .J 4..7 .v Resolution No. 2003 - Page 21 rights -of -way required to implement the approved design for this work in the Caltrans right -of -way, including slope easements for future grading, shall be acquired by the applicant and dedicated to the State in a manner acceptable to Caltrans and the City Engineer. All required dedications shall be illustrated on the Final Map. Proof of encroachment or other non -City permits and bonds shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the start of any grading or construction activities. 71. Prior to or concurrently with the Final Map and prior to any construction for all streets, except for those under the jurisdiction of Caltrans the applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer, enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements, and post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to City of Moorpark requirements including all applicable ADA requirements. Street improvements shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 72. All streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision), unless noted otherwise in the Conditions. 73. The street improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, street lights, and signing, striping, interim striping and traffic control, paving, and any necessary transitions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer and the Community Development Director shall approve all driveway locations. The applicant shall dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 74. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with the latest APWA Standards. 75. Above ground obstructions (utility cabinets, mailboxes, etc.) are to be placed within the right -of -way landscaping areas. When above ground obstructions are to be placed within the sidewalk, a minimum 3.5 feet clear sidewalk width must be provided around the obstruction. 76. The applicant shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. All fences, walls and other structures over six (6) feet high are to be submitted S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -31 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 22 to and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 77. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements shall be acquired by the applicant at his /her expense. 78. Street lights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Prior to Final Map recordation, the applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. 79. The applicant shall make a pro -rata contribution to the mitigation of cumulative regional drainage deficiencies, should the City adopt such a program prior to issuance of the first building permit. 80. Prior to or concurrently with the Final Map the applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. 81. The plans shall depict all on -site and off -site drainage structures required by the City. 82. The drainage plans and calculations shall relate to conditions before and after development. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention and NPDES facilities and drainage courses will be addressed. 83. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Flood Control Standards except as follows: a. All storm drains shall carry a 10 -year frequency storm. b. All catch basins shall carry a 10 -year storm. C. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows. d. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso - Cord \cc resolution. rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 23 84. Surface flows shall be intercepted, detained and given sufficient time to provide storm water clarification by "passive" BMP systems prior to entering collector or storm drain systems. 85. Under a 10 -year frequency storm, local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available on interior residential streets. Collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction. 86. "After- development" drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased above "Pre- development" drainage quantities nor will surface runoff be concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to take care of storm water flows shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 87. Drainage grates shall not be used at any location accessible by pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian traffic. 88. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 50- and 100 -year flood levels. 89. All flows that have gone through flow attenuation and clarification by use of acceptable BMP systems and are flowing within brow ditches, ribbon gutters, storm drain channels, area drains and similar devices shall be deposited directly into the storm drain system and shall be restricted from entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended to accept these flows. Both storm drains and easements outside the public right -of -way are to be privately maintained unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 90. Concrete surface drainage structures exposed to the public view, shall be tan colored concrete, as approved by the Community Development Director, and to the extent possible shall incorporate natural structure and landscape to reduce their visibility. 91. In order to comply with California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements no curb outlets will be allowed for pad drainage onto the street. The applicant shall inform all new and future homeowners that future improvements such as pool construction or other private improvements require observance of the same requirements. This notification agreement shall be acknowledged by each homeowner and recorded with each. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm 7yon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Ce' r), X"r�P.-- I— v J L. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 24 92. Drainage devices for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 93. A hydraulic /hydrologic study shall be prepared which analyzes the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system, with and without the storm drain system for the proposed development. The Developer shall make any downstream improvements, required by the City, to support the proposed development. 94. Improvements shall be constructed to detain drainage on- site when the drainage amount is between the ten -year and fifty -year storm event. A rainfall intensity Zone K shall be utilized in the design unless alternate design intensity is approved by the City Engineer. 95. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate, for each building pad within the development area, that the following restrictions and protections can be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm; b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. c. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Flood Control Standards. d. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 96. The applicant shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as shown on existing drainage studies and approved by the City Engineer, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site detention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners must be specified. 97. The design of the storm drain system shall provide for adequate width easements for future maintenance and reconstruction of facilities particularly those facilities that are deeper than 8 feet. In addition all facilities shall have all - weather vehicular access. This design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S: \Corimur.ity Deveiopment \DE:V PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc IrN 40 .� J� Resolution No. 2003 - Page 25 98. Engineering and geotechnical reports shall be provided to prove, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that all `passive" NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. 99. The Developer shall demonstrate and certify to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that all existing storm drain culverts within the site shall perform in an acceptable manner based on their intended design and the proposed increase /decrease of loading conditions, introduction of surface water within subsurface areas that may affect the culvert and proposed construction. This especially includes cast -in -place concrete pipe (CIPP). 100. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS009002, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 101. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 102. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of one or more acres." The applicant shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 103. The applicant shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 WM Lycr. \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 26 104. Prior to Final Map approval, the appplicant shall provide facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (BMP's) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the Developer to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 105. Prior to City issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require applicant to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite will not be allowed. 106. Prior to the starting of grading or any ground disturbance the applicant shall designate a full -time superintendent for NPDES compliance. The NPDES superintendent shall be present on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is 400 or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. The NPDES superintendent shall have full authority to hire personnel, bind the applicant in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate Best Management Practices. The NPDES superintendent shall provide proof to the City Engineer of attendance and satisfactory completion of courses satisfactory to the City Engineer totaling no less than 8 hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of Best Management Practices. Proof of such attendance and completion shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to employment to the NPDES superintendent. In addition, an NPDES superintendent shall be employed to assume NPDES compliance during the construction of streets, storm drainage systems, all utilities, buildings and final landscaping of the site. 107. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the S: \Cc:nmsnity Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 nm Lycr. \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc AfN r) 41 v r•3 . .Y'v Resolution No. 2003 - Page 27 filing of the Final Map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457: a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter City) in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land, which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with: (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 108. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first residence a copy of the recorded Map(s) shall be forwarded to the City Engineer for filing, and a final grading certification shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 109. Prior to acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 110. Prior to acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration sufficient surety in a form and in an amount acceptable to the City guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided, and shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. 111. Prior to acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration original 'gas built" plans shall be certified by the Developer's Registered Civil Engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. These "as built" plans shall incorporate all plan revisions. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reno- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc CirN ' XN �. v Resolution No. 2003 - Page 28 36 ", they shall be resubmitted as "record drawings" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection is scheduled. Electronic files shall be submitted for all improvement plans in a format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, Developer shall provide an electronic file update on the City's Master Base Map electronic file, incorporating all storm drainage, water and sewer mains, lines and appurtenances and any other utility facility available for this project. C. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Fire Department: 112. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a 20 -ton Ventura County Fire Protection District (Fire District) vehicle shall be installed. 113. All access roads /driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 114. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire District access roads /driveways exceed 150 feet. Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.50 cross slope in any direction and shall be located within 150 feet of the end of the access road /driveway. 115. Public and private roads shall be named if serving more than four (4) parcels. 116. Prior to recordation of street names, proposed names shall be submitted to the Fire District's Communications Center for review. 117. Street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvements. The type of sign shall be in accordance with City of Moorpark Road Standards. 118. Address numbers, a minimum of 4 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event, the structures) is not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posed adjacent to the driveway entrance. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Nm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 29 119. Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of plans for building permits a plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified by address numbers. 120. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of fire hydrants. On plans, show existing hydrants within 500 feet of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 121. Prior to combustible construction fire hydrants shall be installed and in service and shall conform to the minimum standards of the City of Moorpark Water Works Manual. 122. Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location marketers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall still be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 123. Prior to map recordation, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute at 20 psi. 124. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire District within seven (7) days of recordation of said map. D. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1: 125. Prior to issuance of a building permit, provide Ventura County Waterworks District the following: a. Water and sewer improvement plans in the format required. b. Hydraulic analysis by a registered Civil Engineer to determine the adequacy of the proposed and existing water and sewer lines. C. Copy of approval of fire hydrant locations by County of Ventura Fire Protection District. d. Copy of Release from Calleguas Municipal Water District. e. Cost estimates for water and sewer improvements. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso - Cord \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 30 f. Fees: Plan check, construction inspection, capital improvement charge, sewer connection fee and water meter charge. g. Signed Contract to install all improvements and a Surety Bond. E. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Flood Control District: 126. No direct storm drain connections to Ventura County Flood Control District facilities shall be allowed without appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for compliance with Ventura Countywide Stormwater Program. 12'7. Cross Connection Control Devices: At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. S: \Community Developm.ent \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 WM Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 31 EXHIBIT B SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 2003 -01 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each residence adjacent to Walnut Canyon Road, additional articulation shall be applied to the elevations of homes to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for Lots 1 through 6, the slope behind the rear yards of the lots shall be stabilized by either the construction of a retaining wall or by the application of soil nailing, at the discretion of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. Any application so approved must provide at least the minimum rear yard setbacks for the homes on those lots. 3. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, screening landscape materials shall be planted in Lot C (biofiltration area) to help soften views of the slope behind lots 1 through 6 when viewed from Walnut Canyon Road. 4. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, lots A and B shall be planted with a combination of trees, vines, shrubs, and ground cover to provide landscaping along the front of the tract wall. 5. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, continued maintenance of lots A, B, and C shall be ensured by the inclusion of these lots in a landscape maintenance district. 6. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence adjacent to Walnut Canyon Road, a sound wall shall be constructed along the eastern property lines of the lots if determined necessary by a noise study in order for exterior noises to be at or below 65 CNEL. The wall shall be constructed out of decorative materials to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In order to screen the wall, a five (5) foot wide planter shall be provided between the wall and Walnut Canyon Road. This planter S: \Community Developrcent \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 32 shall be planted with trees, shrubs, and vines to screen the wall. 7. To reduce the interior noise levels, a minimum window glass thickness of 3/16 inch and a standard exterior wall of 5/8 inch gypsum board, 3.5 inch fiberglass filled cavity, 7/8 inch lath and stucco, typical for single family residential developments shall be installed. 8. All second story windows along Walnut Canyon Road shall be Milgard type 5120 double - glazed window assemblies, or an equivalent with a minimum STC 33 rating. 9. All rear and side entry doors of the homes on Lots 8 through 17 shall be gasketed (jamb, head, and sill) with interlocking or tube type compression weather stripping, or an effective equivalent. 10. All exterior vents on the homes on Lots 8 through 17 shall be directed away from Walnut Canyon Road in order to reduce noise transmissions into the house through vents and ducts. 11. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, the removal of five native walnut trees shall be mitigated by the replanting on -site of walnut trees in a ratio of 10:1. 12. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, the applicant shall replace trees on the site in an amount equal to the appraised value of the removed trees, as identified in the Tree Report dated December 2002. Should there not be sufficient space to replace the required trees, or should appropriate trees not be available, the applicant shall pay to the City of Moorpark an amount equal to the difference between the appraised amount and the value of the trees planted on site. 13. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by the Community Development Director a `'New Home Maintenance Manual." This Manual shall detail the various systems of the home and the required maintenance that must be performed, along with schedules, home warrantee information, and information on pest control. The manuals shall be provided to each new homeowner as part of the acquisition. 14. Prior to the occupancy of each residence, full lot landscaping, consisting of turf, shrubs and trees on automatic irrigation shall be installed. Front yard landscaping shall consist of turf and a street tree, while S: \Commun.ty Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 t9m Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 33 the rear yard may consist of turf only, except along the retaining wall behind lots 1 through 6, where a combination of at least two (2) 15- gallon trees and three (3) five - gallon shrubs per lot shall be planted along the base of the wall to soften the view of the wall. Tree and shrub species shall be selected by the applicant and approved by the City Landscape Consultant and the Community Development Director prior to planting. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to installation. 15. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence, the applicant shall landscape and irrigate the parkway to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 16. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the building elevations shall be revised to be consistent with the conditions of approval for this Residential Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map No. 5405, subject to Community Development Director approval. 17. All garage doors shall be rollup. A minimum 18 -foot long driveway shall be provided in front of each door. 18. Minimum front yard setbacks on lots 1 through 3 shall be ten (10) feet. An entry porch may encroach by five (5) feet into this setback on lots 1 through 3. Minimum front yard setbacks for lots 4 through 17 shall be 18 feet. 19. Each residence shall maintain a minimum rear yard setback of fifteen (15) feet and a minimum side yard setback of five (5) feet. 20. Accessory structures and patio covers shall maintain a minimum five (5) foot side yard and rear yard setback. STANDARD CONDITIONS A. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Community Development Department: 1. The Residential Planned Development permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the plot plans and elevations incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A ". The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -G1 Wrn Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc .tea f•, � .r, .-y t- Resolution No. 2003 - Page 34 2. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5405 shall apply to this residential planned development permit. 3. Unless the Residential Development Permit is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three (3) years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) one (1) year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if Applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial three -year period and the Applicant has concurrently requested a time extension to the tentative tract map. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least 30 -days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 4. Prior to occupancy of each dwelling unit the applicant shall install front yard landscaping as approved on the landscape plans. 5. No expansion, alteration or change in architectural elements that are visible from any abutting street shall be allowed, unless in the judgment of the Community Development Director such change is compatible with all dwellings having frontage on the same street and located within 200 feet (or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director) of the side property line of the structure proposed for expansion or alteration, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director consistent with these approved conditions and Zoning Code requirements. 6. All air conditioning or air exchange equipment shall be placed at ground level, may not be placed in a sideyard setback area within 15 feet of an opening window at ground floor level of any residential structure, and shall not reduce the required sideyards to less than 5 feet of level ground. 7. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification is submitted to the Department of Community Development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 8. Garages shall maintain a clear unobstructed dimension of 20 feet in length and 10 feet in width for each parking stall S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso - Cord \cc resolution rpd.doc .�„ G, Resolution No. 2003 - Page 35 provided with a minimum of two garage - parking stalls required for each dwelling unit. 9. Rain gutters and downspout shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all structures where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non - corrosive devices as determined by the City Engineer. 10. Hot water solar panel stub -outs shall be provided. 11. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee or owner shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within five (5) days after notification. 12. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Community Development Director), sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. B. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Engineering Division: 13. The City Engineering conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 5405 apply to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 2003 -01. C. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Fire Department: 14. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5405 shall apply. D. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1: 15. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 5405 shall apply. E. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Police Department: 16. Prior to issuance of building permits for either the residential or recreational components of the project, the Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. To the degree feasible, public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into S: \Community Development \DEV PM:'S \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 36 the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare of list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. Review and approval by the Police Department of all defensible space design features incorporated into the project shall occur prior to initiation of the building plan check process. F. For compliance with the following conditions please contact the Moorpark Unified School District: 17. Prior to issuance of building permits for the residential units, all legally mandated school impact fees applicable at the time of issuance of a building permit shall be paid to the Moorpark Unified School District. -End- S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 Wm Lyon \Reso- Cond \cc resolution rpd.doc t � �� � r� •-may ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE NO. 2003 -01, FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM RURAL EXCLUSIVE - 5 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE (RE -5AC) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 7 UNITS PER ACRE (RPD -7U) ON 3.15 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED WEST OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF MILE NORTH OF CASEY ROAD, ON THE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM LYON HOMES (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 500 -0- 270 -050) WHEREAS, on July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2003 -448 recommending approval to the City Council of Zone Change No. 2003 -01, for a change of zone from Rural Exclusive - 5 acre minimum lot size (RE -5Ac) and Open Space (OS) to Residential Planned Development - 7 units per acre (RPD -7U) on a 3.15 acre site located west of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately one -half mile north of Casey Road; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2003, the City Council considered the agenda report for Zone Change No. 2003 -01 and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened and closed the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read, reviewed, considered and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project referenced above. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Zoning Map described and referenced in Chapter 17.12 of Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, CC ATTACHMENT 5 Ordinance No. Page 2 irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit A: Zone Change Map S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 nm Lyor.\Ordinance \cc orninance.doc Cf-, 'r N 4'� #�n Ordinance No. Page 3 " w rs -• EXHIBIT A i• OS -1 • • os 7.3 AG . ... Qr IN- • .�. oa AREA PROPOSED BE ZONED RPD-7u r�ooPv� 1 .d. ♦ A �. ..► ,. • • • - S: \Community Development \DFV PMTS \R P D \2003 \ -01 tom Lycr. \Ordinance \cc ordiiance.doc to occupancy of the 165th residential unit in Tract No. 5187. The Implementation Plan shall include a payment amount by the Developer to provide for the perpetual maintenance of the trail staging area. Said payment shall be made prior to occupancy of the 165th residential unit for Tract 5187. The Implementation Plan shall also include provisions for the Developer to construct a temporary trail staging area within the "A" Street right -of -way south and west of the future intersection of "A" Street and "E" Street of Tract 5187. (d) No extraction of subsurface mineral resources, excavation, drilling, pumping, mining, or similar activity shall be allowed in any portion of the Property zoned Open Space. The limitations and exclusions described in this subsection shall be included in the conservation easements. 6.11. Developer shall provide five (5) four (4) bedroom and two bath single family detached units with a minimum of 1,200 square feet and a maximum of 1,500 square feet to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for low income (80 percent or less of median income); five (5) four (4) bedroom and two bath single family detached units with a minimum of 1,200 square feet and a maximum of 1,500 square feet to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for very low income (50 percent or less of median income) and ten (10) four (4) bedroom and two (2) bath single family detached units with a minimum of 1,200 square feet and maximum of 1,500 square feet to be sold to buyers who meet the criteria for moderate income (110 percent or less of median income). Prior to approval of the first final map for Tentative Tract Map No. 5187, Developer shall acquire at it's sole cost and expense, an approximate two -acre parcel (Affordable Housing Parcel) within the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency project area on which to construct the 20 referenced units. All units shall include a standard size two -car garage with roll -up garage door and a minimum driveway length of eighteen (18) feet measured from the back of sidewalk, meet minimum setback requirements of the City RPD zone, include concrete roof tiles, and other amenities typically found in moderate priced housing in the City (e.g., air conditioning /central heating, washer /dryer hookups, garbage disposal, built -in dishwasher). West Pointe Dev Agr 2001 44 —15 — CC ATTACEMNT 6 Meat Pointe rev Agr 2001 14 Developer must have received city approval of a land use designation, zoning, tentative tract map, residential planned development permit and any other required permits and approvals to allow construction of the referenced twenty (20) dwelling units on the Affordable Housing Parcel prior to approval of the first residential occupancy for Tract Map No. 5187. Developer shall be responsible for the following at its sole cost and expense: (a) Processing of City required entitlements including but not limited to Tentative Tract and Final Map and Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD). (b) Processing of General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and environmental document (up to a Mitigated Negative Declaration but not an Environmental Impact Report). (c) Payment of all required City fees for processing of applications for (a) and (b), above, consistent with City's Fee Schedule in effect at the time an application is filed with the City. (d) Pay all City capital improvement and mitigation fees including but not limited to those fees required in subsections 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.12, 6.16 and 6.17 of this Agreement. (e) Grade the site per approved map, install all utilities, and construct all public and private improvements consistent with City standards typical for such subdivision. The first ten units (5 moderate, 2 low, 3 very low) shall be constructed and ready for occupancy prior to the 100th occupancy in Tract 5187, and the next 10 units (5 moderate, 3 low, 2 very low) shall be constructed and ready for occupancy prior to the occupancy of the 150th unit in Tract 5187. If for any reason less than twenty (20) dwelling units are approved for the Affordable Housing Parcel by the City, Developer shall pay Seventy Thousand Dollars ($70,000.00) to City for each unit less than the required twenty (20) units. The total amount shall be due and payable prior to occupancy of the 50th unit in -16- � 1 F', n 4 ., / - v� West Pointe Dev Agr 2001 N4 Tract 5187. This amount shall be adjusted on March 1, 2005, by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and annually thereafter on each March 1. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the amount due shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. In the event less than twenty (20) units are approved on the Affordable Housing Parcel, the first such unit deducted from the required number of units shall be a moderate income unit, the second such unit a low income unit, the third unit a very low income unit and so forth in the same order. In the event Developer does not receive City approval for at least 16 dwelling units on an Affordable Housing Parcel prior to March 1, 2005, City at it's sole discretion can require payment in the amount of Two Million Six Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars $2,625,000.00 payable prior to approval of the first final map for Tract Map No. 5187. Effective March 1, 2006, this amount shall increase by one -half of one percent (.5 %) each month until paid. At City's sole discretion, two of the lots intended for either low or very low income buyers on the Affordable Housing Parcel may be retained by the City for purposes of constructing the dwelling units in conjunction with a non - profit group. The initial purchase price for the low- income buyers shall not exceed affordable housing cost, as defined in Sec. 50052.5(b) (2) of California Health and Safety Code. For a family of 4, the monthly "affordable housing cost" would be 30% times 70% of $71,800, the current median income for a family of 4 in Ventura County, divided by 12. This monthly amount includes the components identified in Section 6920 of Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations shown below. (See Section 50052.5(c) of the Health and Safety -17- L.J i Code.? The selling price for a household of 4 or fewer, would be $137,500 under current market conditions, based upon the following assumptions: Low Income Buyer Household of Four Item Detail Amount Purchase Price $137,500 Down Payment 5% of purchase price $6,875 Loan Amount 95% of purchase price $130,625 Interest Rate 7.5% Property Tax 1.2596 $143 /mo. HOA $50 /mo. Fire Insurance $40 /mo. Maintenance $30 /mo. Utilities $100 /mo. The initial purchase price for a low- income household of five or more would be based on the affordable housing cost for the actual household size. Under current market conditions, that price would be $150,000 for a household of five, $164,000 for a household of six, and $177,500 for a household of seven. The initial purchase price for the very low - income buyers shall not exceed $90,000, based on the following assumptions: Very Low Income Buyer Household of Four Item Detail Amount Purchase Price $90,000 Down Payment 5% of purchase price $4,500 Loan Amount 95% of purchase price $85,500 Interest Rate 7.5% Property Tax 1.25% $94 /mo. HOA $50 /mo. Fire Insurance $40 /mo. Maintenance $30 /mo. Utilities $100 /mo. West Pointe Dev Agr 2001 44 -18- Nest Pointe Dev Agr 2001 04 That initial purchase price for a very low- income household of five or more would be based on the affordable housing cost for the actual household size. Under current market conditions, that price would be $99,500 for a household of five, $109,000 for a household of six, and $118,500 for a household of seven. The assumptions associated with the above purchase price figures include a minimum of 5% down payment, based on buyer's purchase price, mortgage interest rate of 7.5 %, no mortgage insurance, property tax rate of 1.25 %, homeowners' association dues of $50 per month, fire insurance of $40 per month, maintenance costs of $40 per month, and utilities of $100 per month. The initial purchase price for a moderate income household of four shall not exceed Two Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($240,000.00). The initial purchase price for all three categories of buyers shall be adjusted based on then current interest rates, then applicable income calculations and other pertinent factors as contained in the Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan. If "affordable housing cost ", as defined in Section 50052.5 of California Health and Safety Code, should change in the future, the above guidelines will be modified. The Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan shall address this potential change. The difference between the initial purchase price and market value shall be retained by the City as a second deed of trust and will be further defined in the Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan. City shall control the resale of any of the units. Developer shall pay closing costs for each unit, not to exceed $5,000. Beginning March 1, 2005, and on March 1't for each of fifteen subsequent years, the maximum $5,000 to be paid for closing costs shall be increased annually by any percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for Los Angeles /Orange /Riverside metropolitan area during -19- Neat Pointe Dev Agr 2001 04 the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the amount due shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. In addition, in lieu of constructing ten (10) low income and five (5) very low income affordable housing units, for each of the two hundred fifty dwelling units in the project, developer shall pay to City an In Lieu Fee which shall be used by the City at its sole discretion for the purpose of providing housing affordable to very low, low or moderate income households. The In Lieu Fee in the amount of Three Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($3,400.00) shall be paid prior to issuance of the building permit for each dwelling unit in the Project. Commencing on March 1, 2005 and annually thereafter, the In Lieu Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all In Lieu Fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the In Lieu Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. The initial purchase price, market value, buyer eligibility, resale restrictions, equity share and second trust deed provisions, respective role of City and Developer, and any other items determined necessary by the City shall be set forth in the Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan, which shall be approved by the City Council in its sole and unfettered discretion prior to recordation of the first final Tract Map for this Project. The Developer and City shall, prior to the occupancy of the first residential unit for the Project, execute an Affordable Housing Agreement that incorporates the Plan in total and is consistent with this Agreement. Developer shall pay the City's direct -20- costs for preparation and review of the Affordable Housing Implementation and Resale Restriction Plan and the Affordable Housing Agreement up to a maximum of Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00). 6.12. Developer agrees that the Mitigation Measures included in the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), or subsequent environmental clearance document approved by the Council, set forth the mitigation requirements for air quality impacts. Developer agrees to pay to City an air quality mitigation fee, as described herein (Air Quality Fee), in satisfaction of the Transportation Demand Management Fund mitigation requirement in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Property. The Air Quality Fee may be expended by City in its sole discretion for reduction of regional air pollution emissions and to mitigate residual Project air quality impacts. rat Pointe Dev Agr 2001 14 At the time the Fee is due, City may at its sole discretion require Developer to purchase equipment, vehicles, or other items, contract and pay for services, or make improvements for which Developer shall receive equivalent credit against Air Quality Fee payments or refund of previous payments. The Air Quality Fee shall be One Thousand Four Hundred Forty -Four Dollars ($1,444.00) per residential unit to be paid prior to the issuance of each building permit for the first residential unit in Tract 5187. Commencing on March 1, 2005, and annually thereafter the Air Quality Fee shall be adjusted by any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) until all fees have been paid. The CPI increase shall be determined by using the information provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers within the Los Angeles /Anaheim /Riverside metropolitan area during the prior year. The calculation shall be made using the month of December over the prior month of December. In the event there is a decrease in the CPI for any annual indexing, the fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. For institutional uses, the Air Quality Fee shall be calculated by the Community Development Department -21- ITEM 8. B, P 1A MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Prepared By: Joseph F. Fiss Principal Plann DATE: July 20, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01, Deleting Chapter 5.88 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Regarding Home Occupations, Boutique Sales and Garage Sales and Amending Chapter 17.28.020(B) Regarding Home Occupations and Garage Sales BACKGROUND On June 4, 2003, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, consider, and make a recommendation on proposed amendments to the Municipal Code in order to clarify language related to home occupations, boutique sales, and garage sales and place the regulations in the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission considered a draft ordinance on June 17, 2003, and recommended approval to the City Council. DISCUSSION Chapter 5.88 of the Moorpark Municipal Code was adopted in 1990 to regulate home occupations, boutique sales, and garage sales in order to avoid nuisance impacts to residential neighborhoods. Over time, it has been observed by staff that components of these regulations could be streamlined while still protecting neighborhoods. Staff recommended a number of amendments to address this issue and to relocate these regulations to Title 17, the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance. The most significant changes to the ordinance are the elimination of boutique sales as a separate use (these are now combined with garage sales) and the institution of the requirement that all employees reside at the residence. It should be noted that there are a number of approved home occupations which will not comply with this new requirement for employees to be residents. Staff would consider these home occupations to be legal non - conforming or Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 "grandfathered" and allowed to continue so long as compliance is maintained with all requirements of their home occupation permit. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered this Zoning Ordinance Amendment at its June 17, 2003 meeting. There were no public comments. The Planning Commission suggested clarification to the text of the proposed ordinance related to garage sales that involve multiple properties, or so- called "block" or "group" garage sales, and with this clarification, recommended approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. The text has been revised as recommended by the Planning Commission in the draft ordinance for Council consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01. Schedule second reading and adoption for September 17, 2003. Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.28.020(B) of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2. Agenda report to the Planning Commission, dated June 17, 2003. 3. Planning Commission Resolution PC- 2002 -427 recommending to the City Council Approval of an Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -01, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.28 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATIONS AND GARAGE SALES AND DELETING CHAPTER 5.88 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATIONS, BOUTIQUE SALES AND GARAGE SALES WHEREAS, on June 4, 2003, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to home occupations and garage sales; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 17, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC- 2003 -447 recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01, a proposed ordinance for the deletion of Chapter 5.88 and amendment to Chapter 17.28 of the Moorpark Municipal Code (Exhibit A) pertaining to home occupations and garage sales; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 20, 2003, the City Council conducted a duly- noticed public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 20, 2003, the City Council considered the agenda report, any supplements thereto, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission; opened the public hearing; received written and oral public comments; closed the public hearing; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the determination of the Planning Commission and Community Development Director that this project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the general rule that CEQA does not apply to projects with no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 5.88 of Title 5, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations, of the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety. ATTACHMENT 1 � r% � X", 01-% Ordinance No. Page 2 SECTION 2. Chapter 17.28.020(B) "Home Occupations" of Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Amendments to Chapter 17.28.020(B) (Underline /Strikeout) Chapter 17.28.020 B Home Occupations and Garage Sales 1. Home Occupation Requirements. A home occupation is the interior and incidental use of a dwelling, in all residential zones and in the residential portion of specific plans, for business purposes with a valid home occupation permit meetinq all of the requirements of this section. a. Application. An application for a home occupation permit shall be filed with the community development director on forms prescribed by the community development director along with the fee established by city council resolution. b. Approval criteria. The community development director shall approve an application for a home occupation permit that meets the following criteria: i. The applicant shall be the home owner, or in the case of a rental housing unit, the applicant shall provide a signed owner's statement that the proposed home occupation is allowed under the rental agreement. ii. Accessory structures shall not be used for home occupation purposes. iii. Persons other than residents of the property shall not be engaged on the Property in the home occupation. iv. The home occupation shall not generate pedestrian or vehicular traffic beyond that normal to the zoning district in which it is located. V. Customer services or sales of goods, wares or merchandise on -site shall not be permitted, except by mail or electronic communication. Instruction, tutoring or teaching of a maximum of three students per session and /or six students per day, whichever is more restrictive shall be allowed. The community development director may make allowances for single events having more than the maximum of six students Per day and /or three students per session. vi. Commercial vehicles, having a specific manufacturer's gross weight rating of ten thousand (10,000) pounds or more in connection with the home occupation shall not be permitted as limited by Section 10.04.300 — Commercial Vehicles in Residential Areas. vii. A maximum of one (1) commercial vehicle, having a specific manufacturer's gross weight rating of less than ten thousand (10,000) pounds in connection with the home occupation shall be permitted so long as it is legally parked either on the street or on the site. viii. The use of signs, merchandise, products or other material or equipment displayed for advertising purposes shall not be permitted. ix. Outdoor storage of materials and /or supplies or other outdoor activity related to the home occupation shall not be permitted. X. Uses, by reason of color, design materials construction smoke dust fumes, odors, glare, lighting, noise or vibrations, that alter the residential character of EXHIBIT A the dwelling or unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet of the surrounding area shall not be permitted. xi The home occupation shall be limited to no more than ten percent (10 %) of the gross floor area of the residence. Related materials and supplies shall be stored only in the designated area approved by the community development director. No structural alterations shall be permitted within the dwelling unit to separate any area used for a home occupation from the dwelling space. No area used for a home occupation shall be subleased or rented to another party. xii A valid Moorpark city business registration permit or license shall be required.. xiii. There shall be no storage of flammable, toxic, hazardous, combustible materials indoors or outdoors, including, but not limited to, -gasoline, solvent or gun powder for purposes beyond those normally used for normal household purposes. xiv. The garage, carport, or accessory structures shall not be used for home occupation purposes. There shall be no storage in the garage, carport or dwelling of any materials or supplies not recognized as being part of normal household or hobby use. xv. The home occupation shall not create excessive demand for municipal or utility services or community facilities beyond those customarily provided for residential uses. xvi. There shall be no on premise use of material or mechanical equipment not recognized as being part of normal household or hobby use. xvii. On -site sales of goods, wares or merchandise or on -site commercial activities in residential zones, except as allowed by section 17.28.020B.1.b.v. is prohibited. C. Conditions. In granting a home occupation permit, the director may impose conditions to safeguard and protect the public health, safety and promote the general welfare. The applicant shall agree in writing to comply with all conditions prior to the issuance of a home occupation permit. d. Duration of permit. Unless otherwise specified, the home occupation permit shall be valid for five years from the date of issuance. The permit may be renewed after five -years by filing an application for renewal prior to its expiration and by paying the required fee. e. Revocation of permit. A home occupation permit may be revoked if the community development director makes any of the following findings and notifies the applicant in writing: i. A condition of the home occupation permit has been violated; ii. The use has become detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety; is resulting in a significant traffic impact; or constitutes a nuisance; iii. The home occupation permit was obtained by misrepresentation or fraud; iv. The use for which the home occupation permit was granted has ceased \ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2003 \01 HOP \Ord and Reso \ORD EXHIBIT A.docp���n .r v ! At for six (6) months or more. 2. Garage Sales Requirements. Garage sales shall be permitted in all residential zones, provided the sale conforms to the criteria and conditions identified in this chapter. No application shall be required. The city shall however, monitor garage sales to ensure compliance with the following criteria and limitations. a. No more than three (3) garage sales shall be conducted on the premises in any calendar year; provided, however, a fourth sale shall be permitted if satisfactory proof of a bona fide change in ownership of real property is first presented to the community_ development director. A minimum of 5 days must pass between individual sale events. No single sale event shall be conducted for longer than three (3) consecutive days. Garage sales shall not be held for more than two (2) consecutive weekends. Garage sales shall be conducted between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. b. Property offered for sale at a garage sale may be displayed on a driveway, in a house, and /or in a rear yard, but only in such areas. No property offered for sale at a garage sale may be displayed in any front yard or in any public right -of -way. C. A maximum of six (6) off -site directional signs, not to exceed two (2) feet by two (2) feet, shall be permitted. Written permission to erect signs on private property shall be obtained from the property owners of the site where such signs are to be placed. This written authorization shall be provided to the city upon request. Signs may be displayed only during the hours the garage sale is actively being conducted and shall be removed at the close of the sale activities each day. No signs shall be placed on utility poles or in the public right -of -way. d. A nonprofit organization or association of persons may conduct a garage sale at the residence of one or more of its members pursuant to all of the requirements of this section. One such sale may be held per year without such sale being deemed one chargeable to the premises in question for the purpose of applying the three (3) sales per year limitation set forth in subsection (a) of this section. e. No garage sale shall be held so as to include more than one residence or parcel at the site of the sale without first obtaining written approval from the community development director. In granting an approval for a garage sale encompassing more than one residence or parcel, the director may impose reasonable conditions consistent with the policies of this section. Group garage sales, when coordinated by residents or sponsored by a local homeowners association, may be permitted up to two times per calendar year and shall comply with all other requirements for garage sales. f. The conduct of general retail sales or commercial activities in residential zones, except as is otherwise expressly authorized under the Chapter 17.04 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, shall be prohibited. \ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2003 \01 HOP \Ord and Reso \ORD EXHIBIT A.doc , MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Director Prepared by Joseph F. Fiss, Principal Planner DATE: June 5, 2003 (PC Meeting of 06/17/03) SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2003 -01: Deleting Chapter 5.88 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Regarding Home Occupations, Boutique Sales and Garage Sales and Amending Chapter 17.28.020(B) Regarding Home Occupations and Garage Sales BACKGROUND On June 4, 2003, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, consider, and make a recommendation on a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance related to home occupations, boutique sales, and garage sales. Chapter 5.88 of the Moorpark Municipal Code (Attachment 1) was adopted in 1990 to regulate these uses in order to avoid nuisance impacts to residential neighborhoods. Over time, it has been observed by staff that components of these regulations could be streamlined while still protecting neighborhoods. Staff is recommending a number of amendments to address this issue and relocate these regulations to Title 17, the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance. DISCUSSION Changes to existing regulations are proposed for all three uses currently covered by Chapter 5.88: home occupations, boutiques sales, and garage sales. A draft resolution for Planning Commission consideration along with a proposed ordinance to delete Chapter 5.88 and amend Section 17.28.020(B) of the Moorpark Municipal Code is included in Attachment 2. Home Occupations - The existing ordinance identifies a complex application process that involves notifying "affected property owners, as defined on the assessor's parcel map(s) by the community development director or his designee as the area of concern." It ATTACHMENT 2 G :; J0C Honorable Planning Commission June 17, 2003 Page 2 is a rare occasion when a neighbor expresses any concern with a proposed home occupation, given the existing limits on the types of businesses that may be operated out of a residence. Eighteen (18) criteria governing the permitted activities under a Home Occupation Permit are proposed in the Draft Ordinance. With these criteria, a home occupation would not be readily identifiable to neighbors and the notification process would not be necessary. Any disruption to the neighborhood would be a violation of the permit and the permit would be subject to revocation by the Community Development Director. Boutique Sales - A boutique sale involves small handcrafted items sold from a residence up to three (3) times a year. A boutique sale is so similar to a garage sale, that there should not be a separate set of regulations. Should a boutique sale be proposed that extends beyond the scope of a garage sale, an applicant would have the opportunity to apply for a Temporary Use Permit, which allows the Community Development Director significant discretion in applying conditions of approval. Given these circumstances, the entire Boutique Sale section is proposed to be deleted and addressed by garage sale regulations. Garage Sales - The City has never required permits for garage sales, but has established performance criteria for them. The major proposed change to this section relates to hours of operation. The hours of operation would be similar to allowed hours for construction in the Noise Ordinance, which are from seven a.m. to seven p.m. The maximum allowable size of off -site signs has been reduced from six (6) square feet (2' by 3' maximum), to four (4) square feet (2' by 2' maximum). The maximum number of allowable off -site signs is proposed to be reduced from eight (8) to six (6). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. \ \mor _pri_serv\City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2003 \01 HOP \Agenda Reports \pc _ 030617.doc CC u r Honorable Planning Commission June 17, 2003 Page 3 Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and adequate mitigation can not be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. STAFF RECObOONDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2003- recommending to the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01. Attachments: 1. Chapter 5.88, Moorpark Municipal Code 2. Draft Resolution Recommending City Council Approval of Proposed Changes to Regulations of Home Occupations, Boutique Sales, and Garage Sales. \ \morpri_sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2003 \01 HOP \Agenda Reports \pc 030617.doc ..vv'vU RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -447 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2003 -01: AN ORDINANCE TO DELETE CHAPTER 5.88 AND AMEND CHAPTER 17.28 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO HOME OCCUPATIONS, BOUTIQUE SALES AND GARAGE SALES WHEREAS, on June 4, 2003 the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to home occupations and garage sales; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 17, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a duly- noticed public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2003 -01: a proposed ordinance for the deletion of Chapter 5.88 and amendment to Chapter 17.28 (Exhibit A) of the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to home occupations and garage sales; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 17, 2003, the Planning Commission considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal; closed the public hearing; and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under the general rule that CEQA does not apply to projects with no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The proposed amendments to Chapter 17.28 of the Moorpark Municipal Code are consistent with the City's General Plan, in particular Land Use Element policies 1.1 which calls for orderly residential development. ATTACHMENT 3 Resolution No. PC- 2003 -447 Page 2 delete Chapter 5.88 and amend Chapter 17.28 of the Moorpark Municipal Code (Exhibit A). SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Lauletta, Peskay, Pozza and Chair Landis NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Vice Chair DiCecco PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th DAY OF JUNE, 2003. Kipp A. Landis, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit A: Draft Ordinance \ \mor_pri_sery \City Share \Community Development \ADMIN \COMMISSION \Final Reso \pc 447 zoa 2003 -01 HOP.doc v v � TO: FROM: DATE: ITEM 9-Ce -- - -1� -rte= -- MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Direct July 31, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider Amendments to Chapters 17.20 (Uses by Zone), 17.28 (Standards for Specific Uses), 17.44 (Entitlement - Process and Procedures), 17.60 (Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code) and 17.68 (Public Notice). BACKGROUND The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments contained within the attached draft ordinance have been prepared to address four (4) Council resolutions directing the Planning Commission to study and provide recommendations on changes to the Zoning Ordinance: Resolution No. 2002 -1963 regarding second unit size, Resolution No. 98 -1423 regarding outdoor seating for restaurants, and Resolution No. 96 -1237 regarding allowing recreation vehicle storage in the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) zone, and Resolution No. 2002 -1997 regarding amendments to entitlements and use matrix. At the July 1, 2003, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed proposed amendments to five (5) sections of the Zoning Ordinance and recommended approval. The amendments simplify, clarify and consolidate the entitlement process. DISCUSSION Existing Regulations Entitlements: Chapter 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance covers procedures and required findings for five different types of land -use entitlements, including zoning clearances, planned development permits, conditional use permits, temporary special use permits, and administrative permits. In addition, the variance and administrative exception procedures are covered in �� h Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 this chapter. Modifications of entitlement permits through permit adjustments, minor modifications, or major modifications are also covered in this chapter. General Plan and Zoning Amendments: Chapter 17.60 of the Zoning Ordinance covers the procedures for the filing and action on general plan amendments, specific plan amendments and changes to the zoning code and zoning map. Public Notices: Chapter 17.68 of the Zoning Ordinance covers the procedures for public notification signs when a public hearing is required. Uses by Zone: Chapter 17.20 of the Zoning Ordinance covers those uses that are allowed in each zone and the entitlement permit required prior to construction or occupancy. Standards for Specific Uses: Chapter 17.28 of the Zoning Ordinance covers the standards for specific uses where the City has determined that specific standards need to be applied. Proposed Regulations Entitlements: The proposed amendments to this chapter clarify and simplify the entitlement process. Almost all of the entitlement applications remain, with the exception of minor and major modifications. For modifications to approved entitlements two (2) processes are now suggested, permit adjustment and modification. Permit adjustment approval would be granted by the Community Development Director when it does not involve a change to the language of a condition of approval but merely an interpretation. This would involve such items as minor changes to a site plan, addition of a use which is similar in nature to an approved use in a planned development, or a change of building material or color. A modification would be a change to the conditions of approval or a substantive change to the design of the project such that the project redesign does not resemble the approved application. Modifications can only be approved by the original decision - making authority (i.e. the City Council in most cases). Findings for planned development permits would focus on design rather than mimicking the findings for conditional use permit. General Plan Amendments: The proposed amendment to this chapter is to consolidate its requirements under the Entitlement S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Staff Reports \CC 030820 Entitlement Process R t.doc p 1p .e r�,Z •l.^ Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 3 chapter. Minor adjustments to language have been made to be consistent with the overall language of the Entitlement chapter. Public Notices: The proposed amendment to this chapter is to consolidate its requirements under the Entitlement chapter. All other requirements remain the same. Uses by Zone: The proposed amendments to this chapter remove those uses which are never likely to be in the City, eliminate duplication of uses, incorporate some minor standards for development of certain uses, organize the uses alphabetically and provide for new more current uses. The uses have been organized into a "use matrix" for easy use and symbols have been replaced by the entitlement application abbreviation. In this section staff has addressed the issues of outdoor seating for restaurants and recreation vehicle storage. These amendments also propose to eliminate the requirement of an administrative permit for room additions and patio covers over 120 square feet. Only a zoning clearance would be required if the proposed addition or patio cover meets the required setbacks, height and architectural character of the existing residence. This change will reduce processing time and allow over the counter Planning Division approval of simple room additions and patio covers. It would be staff's intention, should the Council adopted these amendments to informally implement this portion of the amendment after the second reading of the ordinance. These amendments will also eliminate the few conditional use permits that require only Planning Commission approval, making all conditional use permits subject to City Council approval. Staff has made some adjustments to the use list recommended by the Commission to remove the allowance of churches in commercial zones (this change will affect only one church, which would become a legal non - conforming use), to add clarification to wireless communication facilities, to add plant nurseries in the M -2 zone, and minor word changes /additions for clarity such as reference to other sections of the Municipal Code. Standards for Specific Uses: The amendments to this chapter transfer some of the minor standards to the use matrix, make minor revisions to the second dwelling unit section to comply with the latest revisions to state law (AB 1866), and delete specific standards for satellite dish antennas, oil and gas production, mining and reclamation, campgrounds, camps, S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z 0 A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Staff Reports \CC 030820 Ent:tlemer.t Process Rpt.doc ­. ,c `S� Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 4 retreats, golf courses, buildings for the growing of crops and temporary pet vaccination clinics. To bring the City's standards for second units into consistency with AB 1866 the proposed changes would allow second units through the approval of Zoning Clearance when the standards are met, remove the notification requirement and require additional parking on the basis of the number of bedrooms. The City Council also directed that staff examine the unit size for second units. This issue has been addressed by removing the 30% restriction as to the size of the second unit since the size of the second unit is already controlled. Staff has also added a provision that the second unit shall not be larger than the primary unit. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. STAFF RECOMIMMATION 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2. Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2002 -05. Schedule second reading and adoption for September 3, 2003. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Staff Reports \CC 030820 Entitlement Process Rpt.doc J3� C 1 Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 5 Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. PC Resolution (See Draft 3. Existing Chapter 17.20 4. Existing Chapter 17.28 5. Existing Chapter 17.44 6. Existing Chapter 17.60 7. Existing Chapter 17.68 Ordinance for Exhibit(s)) S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Staff Reports \CC 030820 Entitlement Process Rpt.doc C- -.� —.–-. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.20 (USES BY ZONE), 17.28 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES), 17.44 (ENTITLEMENT - PROCESS AND PROCEDURES), 17.60 (AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLANS, ZONING MAP AND ZONING CODE) AND CHAPTER 17.68 (PUBLIC NOTICES) OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, on October 16, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96 -1237 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to allowing recreation vehicle storage in the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) zone; and WHEREAS, on January 7, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 98 -1423 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to revisions to provide for outdoor seating for restaurants; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002 -1997 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to permitted size of second dwelling units; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002 -1997 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to entitlement and uses; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public workshop on the entitlement and use regulations contained in Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60, 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and gave direction to Community Development staff on potential amendments to the regulations; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department drafted proposed amendments to the entitlement and use regulations in response to direction from the Planning Commission; and CC ATTACHMENT 1 Ordinance No. Page 2 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director and the Planning Commission have reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), and based upon that finding has determined the project to be exempt from further environmental documentation; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 17, 2003, and July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a duly- noticed public hearing on proposed amendments to Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60 and 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to entitlement and use regulations, received public testimony on the proposed amendments, and after receiving oral and written public testimony, closed the public hearing and recommended approval of said amendments as proposed; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 20, 2003 the City Council conducted a duly- noticed public hearing on proposed amendments to Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60 and 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to entitlement and use regulations, received public testimony on the proposed amendments, and after receiving oral and written public testimony, closed the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 17.20, "Uses by Zone ", Chapter 17.28, "Standards for Specific Uses ", Chapter 17.44, "Entitlement - Process and Procedures" Chapter 17.60, "Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code" Chapter 17.68 "Public Notice" of Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark are hereby repealed. SECTION 2. Chapter 17.20, "Uses by Zone ", Chapter 17.28, "Standards for Specific Uses ", and Chapter 17.44, "Application Review Procedures" of Title 17, Zoning, of the Municipal Code of the City of Moorpark are hereby adopted as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares S: \Community Development \DEV PICTS \Z O A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Ordinances and Resolut ons \CC 03082C Chapter 17.44 Ordinance.doc .. •,ice . e Ordinance No. Page 3 that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Chapters 17.20, 17.28, and 17.44 S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \Z O A \2002 \05 Entitlement \Ordinances and Resolutions \CC 030820 Chapter 17.44 Ordinance.doc Resolution No. 2003 — Page 4 Chapter 17.20 USES BY ZONE Sections: 17.20.010 Purpose. 17.20.020 Use of matrices. 17.20.030 Uses not listed. 17.20.040 Reserved. 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones. 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. Section 17.20.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to provide a comprehensive list of uses that would be allowed through the issuance of a Zoning Clearance and through discretionary permit approval in the various zones within the City. Section 17.20.020 Use of matrices. The use matrices indicate the level of review required for each use. Review requirements are subject to Entitlements — Process and Procedure, Chapter 17.44. Section 17.20.030 Uses not listed. Review of a use that is not shown in the matrices may be initiated by a written request to the community development director and payment of a review fee established by council resolution. The community development director shall review the proposed use within ten (10) calendar days and render a written decision based upon the findings below. A. The proposed use is similar in nature, character, and intensity to one or more of the listed uses. B. The review requirements for the proposed use shall be identical to those similar uses upon which the community development director has based the determination. If the community development director determines that the use is similar, the director shall inform the city council of the director's decision and incorporate the use in the next scheduled zoning ordinance amendment. The decision of the director is final unless appealed to council within ten (10) calendar days of the written decision. The appeal shall be filed in accordance with Chapter 17.44. Section 17.20.040 Reserved. Section 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones. Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones are set forth in Table 17.20.050 below and in the conditions of approval of any applicable residential planned development permits. In addition to the entitlements required by Table 17.20.050, a planned development permit is required for all residential development of five (5) or more units. All uses, as applicable, shall comply with Moorpark Municipal Code Title 5, Business "faxes, Licenses and Regulations. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 EXHIBIT "A" ,,� Resolution No. 2003 — Page 4 Chapter 17.20 USES BY ZONE Sections: 17.20.010 Purpose. 17.20.020 Use of matrices. 17.20.030 Uses not listed. 17.20.040 Reserved. 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones. 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. Section 17.20.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to provide a comprehensive list of uses that would be allowed through the issuance of a Zoning Clearance and through discretionary permit approval in the various zones within the City. Section 17.20.020 Use of matrices. The use matrices indicate the level of review required for each use. Review requirements are subject to Entitlements — Process and Procedure, Chapter 17.44. Section 17.20.030 Uses not listed. Review of a use that is not shown in the matrices may be initiated by a written request to the community development director and payment of a review fee established by council resolution. The community development director shall review the proposed use within ten (10) calendar days and render a written decision based upon the findings below. A. The proposed use is similar in nature, character, and intensity to one or more of the listed uses. B. The review requirements for the proposed use shall be identical to those similar uses upon which the community development director has based the determination. If the community development director determines that the use is similar, the director shall inform the city council of the director's decision and incorporate the use in the next scheduled zoning ordinance amendment. The decision of the director is final unless appealed to council within ten (10) calendar days of the written decision. The appeal shall be filed in accordance with Chapter 17.44. Section 17.20.040 Reserved. Section 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones. Permitted uses in open space, agricultural, residential and special purpose zones are set forth in fable 17.20.050 below and in the conditions of approval of any applicable residential planned development permits. In addition to the entitlements required by Table 17.20.050, a planned development permit is required for all residential development of five (5) or more units. All uses, as applicable, shall comply with Moorpark Municipal Code Title 5, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 EXHIBIT "A" Cry -�► Ordinance No. Page 5 Table 17.20.050 PERMITTED USES IN OPEN SPACE, AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES [Blank] = Not permitted, NZC = No Zoning Clearance required, ZC = Permitted by Zoning Clearance, AP = Administrative Permit, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, TUP = Temporary Use Permit Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD A. AGRICULTURAL USES 1. Animal Husbandry in accordance with Sections 17.20.040 and 17.28.030 a. Without Structures ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC b. With structures of total gross floor areas per lot: - Less than 1,000 s . ft. ZC ZC ZC ZC - 1,001 — 20,000 s . ft AP ZC AP - 20,001 — 100,000 s . ft. CUP AP - >100,000 s . ft. CUP 2. Animal hospital, for large CUP CUP CUP animals 3. Apiculture in accordance ZC ZC AP with Section 17.28.210 4. Crop production where no ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC structures are involved 5. Greenhouse, hothouse and the like. Minimum property line setbacks shall be 20 -feet. With a total gross floor area per lot: - Less than 1,000 s . ft. ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC %C - 1,001 — 20,000 s . ft. ZC ZC AP AP CUP - 20,001 — 100,000 s . ft. AP CUP - >I 00,000 sq. ft. CUP CUP 6. Kennels and catteries CUP CUP CUP CUP (domestic) see Section 17.28.030 7. Wholesale nurseries, tree AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP farms and ornamental plant farms including container plants. Retail sales shall be limited to the requirements of section 17.28.070 8. Wildlife sanctuaries CUP CUP B. RESIDENTIAL USES Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD 'FPD 1. Boardinghouses and bed and CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP breakfast inns 2. Care facilities PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 �— `� Ordinance No. Page 6 Zones O -S A -E R -A WE R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD a. Consistent with the NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC requirements of the State of California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 3.6. Care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons, such as a any facility defined as a community care facility and residential care facilities as defined by Chapters 3 and 3.2 of the Health and Safety Code, shall meet the standards and requirements applicable to single family dwellings b. For seven (7) to twelve (12) ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC children, up to 14 children may be allowed when found consistent with Section 1597.465 of the Health and Safety Code 3. Dwellings, single family a. Standard construction, AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP including manufactured housing consistent with Section 17.28.020 C (tor five (5) or more homes constructed in the R -A, R -O, R -E, and R -1 zones a planned development permit is required) b. Less than five (5) affordable AP AP AP or senior housing when in compliance with Chapter 17.64 c. Second dwelling units when ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC in compliance with section 17.28.020G 4. Dwellings, two - family or two single family dwellings on one lot a. Less than five (5) dwelling AP AP units b. Less than five (5) affordable AP AP or senior housing units when in compliance with Chapter 17.64 5. Dwellings, multiple family a. Less than five (5) dwelling AP units b. Less than five (5) affordable AP or senior housing units when in compliance with Chapter 17.64 PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 Ordinance No. Page 7 Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD 6. Mobilehome parks in CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP compliance with the applicable standards of the zone in which it is located. It shall include recreation facilities with minimum distance between structures of ten (10) feet and minimum distances between accessory structures of six (6) feet 7. Model homes, temporary AP AP AP AP AP AP AP office for the sale of homes or lots in a subdivision that are a part of an approved tentative map and when there is a model complex plan/temporary office plan approved by the community development director C. PUBLIC AND QUASI - PUBLIC USES Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD 1. Places of religious worship, CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP with or without schools 2. Clubhouses with or without CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP alcoholic beverage sales 3. Colleges and universities CUP 4. Communication facilities, CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP including wireless in accordance with the requirements of chapter 17.42 (Minor facilities require only planning commission approval; pre- approved locations require only an AP 5. Energy production from CUP CUP CUP renewable resources 6. Governmental uses CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP including, but not limited to city offices, community rooms, fire stations, human service centers, libraries, police stations, public utility facilities 7. Utility structures (electrical AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP boxes, transformers and valve apparatus that have no covered floor area and are attached to the ground by poles, columns or pedestals shall not require a PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 �? -� Ordinance No. Page 8 Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD zoning clearance 8. Wireless communication CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP facilities in accordance with chapter 17.42 (Minor facilities require only planning commission approval; pre - approved locations require only an AP) D. ACCESSORY AND MISCELLANEOUS USES Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD 1. Animal keeping in accordance with the requirements of Section 17.28.030 a. A iculturc ZC ZC ZC b. Aviaries AP AP AP AP c. Farm animals including NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC horses and ponies subject to the requirements of Section 17.28.30 d. Pet animals are allowed in NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC all zones subject to the requirements of Section 17.28.030C e. Wild animals subject to the AP AP AP requirements of Chapter 6.24 2. Accessory structures a. balcony, deck, patio covers, ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC room additions, or storage sheds b. Fences and walls less than NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC six (6) feet and retaining walls less than three (3) feet in height, paving and decks when constructed lower than thirty (30) inches above the immediate surrounding natural grade c. Fences and walls greater ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC than six (6) feet and retaining walls greater than three (3) feet in height, paving and decks when constructed higher than thirty (30) inches above the immediate surrounding natural grade d. Swimming, wading or ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ornamental pools designed for PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 -_ — .1 Ordinance No. Page 9 Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD a water depth greater than eighteen (18 ) inches 3. Antenna or flag pole, ground mounted, non - commercial AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP a. <35 -feet high b. >35 -feet high CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP 4. Dwelling, caretaker AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 5. Dwellings, farm labor AP AP AP 6. Home occupation when NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC conducted in an existing single family home and consistent with the requirements of Section 17.28.020B 7. Maintenance and minor ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC repair to buildings involving structural alterations 8. Motion picture and TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP television production and related activities and structures (activities of a maximum of 42 days in any 180 -day period are considered temporary and shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.28.120 and Title 5 of the Moorpark Municipal Code 9. Mobilehomes or recreation TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP vehicle as temporary dwelling on the site of an active building permit during construction 10. Produce stands in ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC compliance with the requirements of section 17.28.070 11. Recreational facilities, non- CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP profit or for profit, including, but not limited to athletic fields, bicycle and skate parks, community centers, golf courses, gymnasiums, retreats, riding stables. Bicycle and skate parks shall be in compliance with section 17.28.240 (Public park and recreation facilities are permitted in all zones and do not require a CUP or a ZC 12. Storage of building ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 � T Ordinance No. Page 10 Zones O -S A -E R -A R -E R -O R -1 R -2 RPD TPD materials in accordance with CUP 2. Automobile /]i ht truck/motorcycle AP AP AP AP the requirements of section a. rental (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned AP property a conditional use pen-nit is required) a. brakes, oil changes tires and shock sales and AP AP AP AP 17.28.160 13. Storage, open consistent NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC with section 17.28.020F 14. Soil testing for wells, NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC NZC foundations, septic systems and similar construction 15. Temporary uses including, TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP but not limited to carnivals, Christmas tree sales, circuses, festivals, movie and television production, sidewalk sales, special events, outdoor sales, when in compliance with chapter 17.44. Issuance of a temporary use permit shall take the place of a zoning clearance. Temporary uses lasting more than 180 days require an AP Section 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones are set forth in Table 17.20.060 below and in the conditions of approval of any applicable commercial and industrial planned development permits. In addition to the entitlements required by Table 17.20.060, a planned development permit is required in all commercial and industrial zones for any use where the total gross floor area of buildings on the property is 10,000 square feet or greater. All uses, except for those specifically identified as outdoor uses shall be operated within a building. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, a discretionary permit, or an exception, the community development director shall verify that the site, use or structure has an approved planned development permit if needed in accordance with this Section and Section 17.44.040(C). All uses shall comply with Moorpark Municipal Code Title 5, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations. Table 17.20.060 PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES [Blank] = Not permitted, NZC = No Zoning Clearance required, ZC = Permitted by Zoning Clearance, AP = Administrative Permit, CUP = Conditional Use Permit, TUP = Temporary Use Permit Zones C -O C -1 CD C -2 GOT M -1 I M -2 I A. RETAIL AND SERVICE USES 1. Adult businesses CUP CUP 2. Automobile /]i ht truck/motorcycle AP AP AP AP AP a. rental (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned AP property a conditional use pen-nit is required) a. brakes, oil changes tires and shock sales and AP AP AP AP PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 ,,., R „� 4 .. Ordinance No. Page 11 Zones CPD C -O C -1 C -2 C -OT M -1 M -2 I installation, tune -ups (with or without hydraulic lifts) (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) b. engine rebuilding, transmission repair, steam CUP CUP cleaning, auto body, painting c. sales, service and parts CUP CUP 3. Automobile service stations with or without mini- CUP CUP marts and with or without beer and wine sales for off -site consumption 4. Body piercing and/or tattoo CUP CUP 5. Building supplies (if within 100 feet of a AP CUP residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 6. C ber cafes, video/computer arcades, game rooms CUP CUP CUP 7. Car washes, self - service or automatic with or CUP without automotive services stations 8. Hay and feed sales CUP CUP 9. Hotels, motels and bed - and - breakfast inns CUP CUP CUP CUP 10. Kennels and catteries I CUP CUP 11. Liquor stores (when located no closer than 1,000 AP AP AP feet of any other liquor store or public or private school) (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 12. Massage, therapeutic when in compliance with AP AP AP chapter 5.48 (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 13. Nurseries (retail) with or without container CUP grown plants when all equipment and supplies kept in an enclosed area. (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 14. Nurseries (wholesale and/or retail) with or CUP without container grown plants when all equipment and supplies kept in an enclosed area (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 15. Pawnshops when in compliance with chapter CUP 5.32 16. Pest control services (if within 100 feet of a AP AP residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 17. Private post offices, parcel services, copy centers ZC ZC ZC ZC (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 18. Psychics, fortunetelling, and spiritual advisors CUP when in compliance with Title 5 of the Moorpark Municipal Code PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 C —*a Ordinance No. Page 12 Zones CPD C -O C -1 C -2 C -OT M -1 M -2 I 19. Recreation vehicle storage yard when not located CUP on parcels adjacent to Arterial Roads or Freeways as shown on the Moorpark Circulation Element Map I 20. Recycling centers CUP CUP CUP 21. Recycling drop -off bins when located in an area ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC determined by the community development director not to be in conflict with parking, vehicle or pedestrian circulation (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required 22. Rental and leasing of large equipment AP AP with/without outdoor storage and repair (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 23. Retail shops and services, except as otherwise ZC ZC ZC ZC indicated in this Table, including, but not limited to antiques, art/art supplies, auto supply, bakery, barbers, beauty salons, bicycle sales /service, book and stationery, camera/photo, carpet sales /cleaning, cigar /cigarette sales, clothing and fabric, computer sales, copy services and supplies, day care, department and variety, dry cleaners, florist, flooring/carpet sales /service, food and market, gift and novelty, hardware, home and office furniture, jewelry, key and locksmiths, music, newstands, pet grooming, pet supplies, pharmacy, photo /camera, pool supplies, sporting goods, small equipment rental (no outdoor storage), spa, toy and hobby, used merchandise, video /DVD /CD sales and rental, wireless sales/service and uses which the community development director determines to be similar when in compliance with section 17.20.020 (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 24. Retail sales combined with limited distribution AP and/or warehousing (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 25. Retail sales in the M -1 and M -2 zone limited to a AP AP maximum of 20 % of the gross floor area of the building in which it is located. In an industrial complex the 20 % shall be computed on the basis of the cummulative total (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) TUP 26. Retail sales (temporary) in the M -1 and M -2 TUP zones. Issuance of a temporary use permit shall take the place of a zoning clearance. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 ? �`3 Ordinance No. Page 13 Zones CPD C -O C -1 C -2 C -OT M -1 M -2 I 27. Thrift stores, consignment store (if within 100 ZC ZC ZC feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use pernut is required) B. EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 1. Alcoholic beverage sales for off -site consumption when in conjunction with another city approved use AP AP AP AP AP a. beer and/or wine (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) b. beer, wine and other alcoholic beverages CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP 2. Bars with or without entertainment including, CUP CUP CUP CUP but not limited to cocktail lounges, cabarets 3. Breweries, micro breweries, wineries /tasting rooms a. With or without restaurant and with or without CUP CUP AP AP outdoor seating b. With or without restaurant and with CUP CUP CUP CUP entertainment and with or without outdoor seating 4. Restaurants and similar establishments engaged primarily in the retail sale of prepared food for on- site or off -site consumption in accordance with the restrictions below: a. With or without entertainment and with or AP AP AP AP AP without on -site consumption of beer and wine and with or without outdoor seating (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) b. With or without entertainment and with on -site CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP consumption of beer, wine and other alcoholic beverages and with or without outdoor seating c. With drive -in or drive- through facilities (off -site CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP sale of all alcoholic beverages is prohibited) with or without outdoor seating C. OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL USES C -2 M -1 M -2 Zones C -O C -1 CPD C -OT IPD IPD I 1. Banks and other financial institutions (if within ZC ZC ZC ZC 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 2. Laboratories: research and scientific (if within 100 AP ZC ZC feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 3. Professional and administrative offices, ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC ZC including, but not limited to: accounting, advertising agencies, chiropractic, collection services; dental, direct mail marketing companies, employment agencies, engineering services PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 Ordinance No. Page 14 Zones CPD C -O C -1 C -2 GOT M -1 M -2 I insurance, investment, medical, optical and related health services; planning services, real estate services; secretarial services, travel agencies, and uses which the community development director determines to be similar when in compliance with section 17.20.020 (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 4. Veterinary offices and animal hospitals a. Without boarding (keeping of animals indoors AP AP AP AP AP AP and on -site for medical purposes shall not be considered boarding, if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required b. With boarding indoors or outdoors CUP CUP CUP D. MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLY, AND DISTRIBUTION USES 1. Cement, concrete and plaster, and product CUP fabrication 2. Distribution and transportation facilities CUP CUP 3. Heavy machinery repair, including trucks, tractors CUP and buses 4. Manufacturing and assembly including, but not ZC ZC limited to appliances, cabinets, cleaners, clothing, computers, cosmetics, detergents, electronics, furniture, leather products, machinery, medical and scientific instruments, paper, perfumes, pharmaceuticals, photographic and optical goods, plastic products, signs and advertising displays, soap, textiles and other uses which the community development director determines to be similar when in compliance with section 17.20.020 (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 5. Outdoor storage when in conjunction with a city CUP AP approved use and when all storage is screened by an 8 -foot high masonry wall architecturally matched to the structure. (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 6. Warehousing, including self - storage or mini- CUP CUP storage. Self- storage or mini - storage shall not be permitted on parcels adjacent to Arterial Roads or Freeways as shown on the Moorpark Circulation Element Ma 7. Welding (if within 100 feet of a residentially AP ZC zoned property a conditional use permit is required) PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 Ordinance No. Page 15 Zones CPD I C -O C -1 C -2 C -OT M -1 M -2 I E. PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC USES 1. Amusement and recreational facilities as defined in Chapter 17.08 a. Arcades video and computer) CUP CUP CUP CUP b. Health club /gymnasium/fitness center /spa (if AP AP AP AP CUP within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 2. Places of religious worship CUP CUP 3. Clubhouses, social clubs, service clubs with or AP AP AP AP AP without alcohol (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 4. Communication facilities, including wireless in CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP accordance with the requirements of chapter 17.42 (Minor facilities require only planning commission approval; pre- approved locations require only an AP) 5. Energy production from renewable resources CUP CUP 6. Public education and training facilities including, ZC but not limited to colleges and universities, elementary, middle and high schools, professional and vocational schools 7. Governmental uses including, but not limited to CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP city offices, community rooms, fire stations, human service centers, libraries, police stations, public utility facilities 8. Hospitals including urgent care (if within 100 AP AP AP AP feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use pen-nit is required) 9. Recreational facilities (private) with/without food AP AP AP AP AP CUP services, including but not limited to bicycle and skate parks, golf courses, gymnasiums, fitness, health spas, martial arts, racquetball, yoga. Bicycles and skate parks shall be in compliance with section 17.28.240 (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 10. Utility structures (electrical boxes, transformers AP AP AP AP AP AP AP and valve apparatus that have no covered floor area and are attached to the ground by poles, columns or pedestals shall not require a zone clearance 11. Wireless communication facilities in CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP accordance with chapter 17.42 (Minor facilities require only planning commission approval; pre- approved locations require only an AP) F. ACCESSORY AND MISCELLANEOUS USES Zones C -2 I M -1 I M -2 C -O C -1 CPD C -OT IPD IPD I 1. Dwelling, caretaker for self storage or mini- I AP PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 �'I 'I d Ordinance No. Page 16 Zones CPD C -O C -1 C -2 GOT M -1 M -2 I warehouse 2. Outdoor sales CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP 3. Retail shops and services as listed in Table AP 17.20.060A.22 when the uses are determined by the community development director to be ancillary to the office uses of the zone (if within 100 feet of a residentially zoned property a conditional use permit is required) 4. Temporary uses including, but not limited to TUP ` `UP TUP TUP TUP TUP TUP carnivals, Christmas tree sales, circuses, festivals, movie and television production, sidewalk sales, special events, outdoor sales, when in compliance with Chapter 17.44. Issuance of a temporary use permit shall take the place of a zoning clearance. Temporary uses lasting more than 180 days require an AP. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.20 G."— Ordinance No. Page 17 Chapter 17.28 STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES Sections: 17.28.010 Purpose. 17.28.020 Standards relating to dwellings. 17.28.030 Standards relating to animals. 17.28.040 Auto, boat and trailer sales lots. 17.28.050 Mobilehome parks. 17.28.060 Reserved. 17.28.070 Produce stands. 17.28.080 Reserved. 17.28.090 Reserved. 17.28.100 Reserved. 17.28.110 Reserved. 17.28.120 Motion picture and TV production, temporary. 17.28.130 Outdoor sales and services, temporary. 17.28.140 Christmas tree sales. 17.28.150 Temporary buildings during construction. 17.28.160 Storage of building materials, temporary. 17.28.170 Reserved. 17.28.180 Reserved. 17.28.190 Reserved. 17.28.200 Reserved. 17.28.210 Reserved. 17.28.220 Reserved. 17.28.230 Reserved. 17.28.240 Bicycle and Skate Parks. 17.28.250 Reserved. Section 17.28.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth standards and regulations in addition to the required standards and regulation which apply to specific uses as listed in section 17.20.050 and section 17.20.060.. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -0), 1994) Section 17.28.020 Standards relating to dwellings. A. Antennas, Ground - Mounted. No antenna or mast shall exceed seventy -five (75) feet in height. The crank -up variety antennas shall be used. All units are encouraged to be color - coordinated to harmonize with predominant structural background material, so as to reduce visual impacts. Where feasible, support structures shall be screened from public view. The most unobtrusive locations for the antennas are generally in the rear yard, behind trees and adjacent to main or accessory buildings in order to provide background screening for the support structure. The height, nature, texture and color of all materials to be used for the installation, including landscape materials, shall be submitted with the permit application. B. Home Occupations. See Chapter 5.88. C. Mobilehomes and Manufactured Housing. 1. Mobilehome Construction. Mobilehomes may be used as single- family dwellings if the mobilehome was constructed on or after June 15, 1976. Mobilehomes used as second dwellings are subject to this date limitation. 2. Mobilehome Foundation System. Mobilehomes which are used as single- family PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 18 residences or as caretaker or. farm worker dwellings shall be installed on a foundation system in compliance with Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 1333 of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Nonconforming mobilehomes renewed under a continuation permit shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 2, Article 7 of Title 25. 3. Exterior Siding. Exterior siding of a single- family dwelling shall extend to the ground level, or to the top of the deck or structural platform where the dwelling is supported on an exposed pile foundation complying with the requirements of Sections 2908 and 2909 of the Uniform Building Code, or to the top of a perimeter foundation. For mobilehomes used as caretaker or farm worker dwellings, manufactured mobilehome skirting shall completely enclose the mobilehome, including the tongue, with a color and material that will be compatible with the mobilehome. The siding shall be covered with an exterior material customarily used on conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development. 4. Site Plan and Elevations. The site plans and elevations of the proposed housing unit are subject to review and approval of the department of community development. Applicants are required to submit designs which are in keeping with the overall character and quality of the neighborhood and community. 5. Roof Pitch. The mobile home or manufactured housing unit shall have a roof with a pitch of not less than two (2) inches vertical rise for each twelve (12) inches of horizontal run and consisting of shingles or other material customarily used for conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development and the building official. 6. Porches and Eaves. The mobile home or manufactured housing unit may be required to have porches and eaves, or roofs with eaves when, in the opinion of the department of community development, it is necessary to make it compatible with the dwellings in the area. D. Mobilehome or Recreational Vehicle as Temporary Dwelling During Construction. A mobilehome or recreational vehicle may be used for living purposes for a twelve (12) month period by the owner (s) of a lot for which a building permit has been issued, is in full force and effect on the same site, and construction is underway. The community development director may grant one (1) additional twelve (12) month time extension if substantial progress toward construction of the principal residence is being made. Said mobilehome or recreational vehicle shall be connected to the permanent water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the Ventura County environmental health division for the structure under construction. Within forty - five (45) days after the issuance of a zoning clearance for occupancy the mobilehome or recreational vehicle shall cease use as a dwelling, be disconnected from such systems, and shall be removed from the site. A temporary mobilehome or recreational vehicle may be accessory to construction on adjacent lots under the same ownership as the lot on which the mobilehome or recreational vehicle is installed. In no case shall the mobilehome or recreation vehicle be rented, leased or otherwise occupied by a non -owner of the lot. A bond or cash deposit shall be required in the amount to cover removal of the temporary mobilehome prior to receiving city approval for the placement of the temporary dwelling. The amount of the deposit shall be determined by the community development director. E. Reserved. F. Open Storage. 1. There shall be no open storage in any front or street -side setback, or in an area three (3) feet wide along interior side lot lines. 2. On lots of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet or smaller, open storage shall not exceed an aggregate area of two hundred (200) square feet. On lots greater in area than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, the aggregate area shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the total lot area, up to a maximum of one thousand (1,000) square feet. Lots of forty (40) acres or more in the O -S and A -E zones are permitted a maximum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of open storage, provided that all open storage exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet is screened from view PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 19 from all public rights -of -way within three hundred (300) feet of such additional storage area. 3. With the exception of boats and unstacked automotive vehicles, the materials shall be limited to a height of six (6) feet. 4. Open storage must be accessory to the principal use of the property, and not related to any off -site commercial business or activity. 5. The following are not considered to fall within the definition of open storage, and are therefore exempt from the above open storage regulations: a. Materials or equipment kept on any lot for use in construction of any building or room addition on said lot for which a zoning clearance and necessary building permits are obtained and in force, provided that such storage is neat and orderly, and does not exceed an area equal to the gross floor area of the building or addition under construction. Stored materials shall be installed within one hundred eighty (180) days of their placement on the lot; however, the community development director may grant a time extension for good cause, based on a written request from the applicant; b. Items used periodically or continuously on the property by the resident(s) thereof, such as outdoor furniture, trash cans or barrels, equipment for maintenance of the property, outdoor cooking equipment, and recreational equipment, accessory to the principal use; c. One cord (128 cubic feet) of firewood, if stored in a neat and orderly manner in one (1) location on the lot. G. Second Dwelling. 1. Standards and Requirements. A second dwelling, as defined in Section 17.08.010, requires approval of a zoning clearance, and compliance with all of the following standards and requirements: a. A second dwelling shall only be permitted on a residential zoned lot that is one -fourth acre (ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet) or larger in size and shall be a lot which conforms to the minimum lot width, depth and size of the zone in which it is located. b. The lot on which a second dwelling is to be constructed shall contain an existing single - family dwelling, which is owner occupied at the time of application for a zoning clearance and building permit for the second dwelling. c. The maximum size of the second dwelling shall be no larger than the primary dwelling and shall be limited to the following lot size limitations: Lot Size Max. 2 "d Unit Size, ins . ft. 10,890 — 21,780 s . ft. 800 21,781 — 43,560 s . ft. 900 1 — 5 acres 1,000 >5 acres 1,100 d. No more than one (1) second dwelling is allowed on each lot. e . The second dwelling shall not be sold as a separate unit, but it may be rented. f. Establishment of a second dwelling shall not create or increase a nonconforming use or structure. A second dwelling shall not be allowed on a lot which contains a legal nonconforming use or structure. g. Minimum yard setbacks from the property lines for the second dwelling and associated garage or carport structure shall be the same as is required for the existing single - family dwelling based on the more restrictive of either: (i) the setback requirements of an approved residential planned development (RPD) permit (see Section 17.36.030(B)(3)); or (ii) the setback requirements of the applicable zone district (see Section 17.24.020). h. Architectural standards of the second dwelling shall conform to the existing single - family dwelling through use of the appropriate building form, height, materials and color. The roof PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 20 material used for the second dwelling shall be equal to or of higher quality than that used for the existing single- family dwelling. i. The only accessory structures that may be attached to, or share a common wall with, a detached second dwelling are a garage or carport. j. The following parking standards shall apply: k. The number of parking spaces required shall be as follows: (A) One (1) covered or uncovered parking space for studio or one bedroom units. (B) Two (2) covered or uncovered parking spaces for two (2) bedroom units. For more than two (2) bedroom units additional parking may be required provided that the community development director finds that additional parking is directly related to the use of the second unit and is consistent with the existing neighborhood standards applicable to the existing dwellings. (i) The size of each required off - street parking space shall be an unobstructed minimum of nine (9) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long. (ii) The parking space(s) provided for the second dwelling shall not be located in a required dwelling unit setback and shall be paved. (iii) The required off - street parking space(s) for a second dwelling shall be in addition to the parking required for the existing single - family dwelling, and shall be located on the same lot as the existing single- family and second dwellings. (iv) Vehicular access to the parking area for a second dwelling shall be at least ten (10) feet wide and paved. 1. The community development director may approve the use of a mobilehome or a manufactured house on a fixed foundation as a second dwelling, if the design is compatible with the existing single- family dwelling and the surrounding community, and when it is in compliance with all of the mobilehome and manufactured housing standards of subsection C of this section. H. Use of Structures for Dwelling Purposes. Structures may not be used for human habitation except as specifically permitted in this title. Section 17.28.030 Standards relating to animals. A. Purpose. These regulations are intended to establish standards and conditions for the keeping of all animals in the city while protecting the health, safety and welfare of its residents. B. General Provisions -- Standards. All the standards contained in this section shall apply equally to all properties unless otherwise noted. 1. Enclosure. All animals shall be properly caged or housed, and must be kept in their corrals, barns, pens or other enclosure. All corrals, pens, coops, lofts, exercise areas, or other similar structures shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed to adequately confine the animal(s). 2. Maintenance. All buildings housing farm animals, all animal enclosures and all pasture areas shall be maintained free from litter, garbage and the accumulation of manure. Premises shall be maintained in a neat and sanitary manner. If farm animals are not maintained in compliance with these standards, or are otherwise allowed to become a nuisance, the city shall initiate enforcement proceedings as provided by this code. 3. Animals Not Classified. Any animal not specifically classified within this chapter shall be classified by the community development director, based upon a determination as to the probable negative impact of the health, safety or general welfare upon the community. C. Pet Animals. The keeping of pet animals is permitted in all zones of the city, subject to the following provisions: 1. Dogs, Cats, Pot - Bellied Pigs and Miniature Horses. a. Dogs, cats, pot - bellied pigs and miniature horses are permitted to be kept upon lots used primarily for residential or agricultural uses, for recreational purposes (and as protection) as provided in subsection (13)(1)(b) of this section. They are permitted to be kept as an accessory use upon any lot developed with an office, business or other commercial or industrial use for the primary purpose of protecting the premises from varmints and trespassers. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Cam• r ..i � ae �J Resolution No. 2003 — Page 21 b. Single family dwellings may keep up to four (4) dogs, four (4) cats, four (4) pigs, or four (4) miniature horses, or any combination not to exceed a total of four (4) animals. Multifamily dwellings may have up to two (2) dogs, cats, pot - bellied pigs or miniature horses or any combination not to exceed a total of two (2) animals. c. The offspring of animals are allowed and shall not be counted towards the maximum allowed number until they are weaned or self - sufficient age. Dogs and cats, pot - bellied pigs and miniature horses shall be counted as weaned at four (4) months of age or more. 2. Other Allowed Household Animals. a. A maximum of fifteen (15) other domestic animals such as domestic mice and rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, chelonians, tropical fish, birds of the psittacine family (enclosure must be set back at least fifteen (15) feet from any dwelling or adjacent property). b. Small caged crustaceans, amphibians and arthropods, and other similar animals commonly sold in pet stores and kept as household pets, may be kept upon any lot in any zone where the principal use upon any such lot is residential, so long as animals are not maintained for commercial purposes, do not constitute a nuisance, are adequately provided with food, care and sanitary facilities, and do not exceed a total of six (6) animals (fish being exempt) on any lot either within or outside any dwelling. Offspring less than four (4) months from old shall not be counted in the total. c. Animals that, because of size, specialized breeding or other unique quality, cannot be clearly categorized may be permitted (including total number), upon approval of the community development director. 3. Animal Units. The keeping of farm animals as a principal or accessory use, except for pet animals, shall be permitted in accordance with the matrix and table of animal unit equivalents set forth below: Zone Minimum Lot Animal Units Permitted',2 Distance Separation Area Requirements' Required O -S 10,000 sq. ft. Lots < 20,000 sq. ft.: two units^. Lots Except for movement on and A -E 20,000 sq. ft. to 10 acres: 1 unit per 10,000 off the property, animals shall R -A sq. ft. of lot area. not be kept, maintained or Lots > 10 acres: no limit. used in any way, inside or outside of any structure, R -O 20,000 sq. ft. Horses /ponies: 3 units plus 1 unit per 30,000 sq. ft. of total lot area. within 40 feet of a structure Other animals: 1 unit per 10,000 sq. ft. of used for human occupancy total lot area. other than the owner's residence. R -E 10,000 sq. ft. 2 units minimum plus 1 unit per 20,000 sq. ft. of total lot area .4 R -1 20,000 sq. ft. 1 unit per 10,000 sq. ft. of lot area. Notes: 1. In calculating the allowable number of animals, fractional numbers shall be rounded to the lower whole number. 2. Animal offspring are allowed and shall not be counted until they are weaned. 3. Separation requirements do not apply to pet animals (see subsection C of this section). 4. No cows, bulls, horses, mules or donkeys on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in the R -A or R -E zone; see subsection E of this section for exception. ANIMAL UNIT EQUIVALENTS PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 �r;, lr..v_.rr r Resolution No. 2003 — Page 22 The following table indicates the animal unit equivalents for each type of permitted animal and provides for different types of animals to be combined on a given lot. The table is to be interpreted as follows: a cow is one (1) animal unit, a chicken is one -tenth (1 /10) of an animal unit, and so on. To calculate the number of any one (1) type of animal allowed on a property, divide the total number of animal units allowed on the property by the animal unit equivalent for that animal. Animal Type Animal Unit Equivalent Animal Type Animal Unit E uivalent Bull 1.0 Horse 1.0 Chicken 0.1 Pony 0.5 Cow 1.0 Mule 1.0 Donkey 1.0 Peafowl 0.5 Duck 0.1 Pig 0.5 Game Hen 0.1 Rabbit or other fur- bearing animal of similar size at maturity .05 Goat, female 0.33 Racing Pigeon .05 Goat, male 0.5 Sheep 0.33 Goose 0.16 Turkey 0.16 Guinea Fowl 0.5 No roosters, peafowl or guinea fowl are permitted in the R -1 zone or on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in area in other zones. D. Applicability of Lot Area Requirements. Abutting lots under unified control, either through ownership or by means of a lease, may be combined in order to meet minimum area requirements for animal- keeping or to keep a greater number of animals, but only for the duration of such common ownership or lease, and only in zones which allow the keeping of animals as a principal use. E. Temporary Exception. In the R -E zone, the community development director may authorize the keeping of a maximum of two (2) horses on lots of ten thousand (10,000) to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, and an exception to the distance separation requirements for a period of one (1) year, without holding a public hearing, provided that the applicant submits: 1. A completed application form, as provided by the community development director; 2. A county assessor map, in duplicate, showing the applicant's property outlined in red, the area and structures to be devoted to animal use and the assessor parcel numbers of all contiguous properties; and 3. A letter of consent from each resident located within one hundred (100) feet of where the horses are to be kept, maintained or used in any other way. The letter shall contain the assessor parcel number, address and telephone number of the contiguous resident, and shall state that the contiguous resident is agreeable to the requested keeping of horses and to the requested reduction of the distance separation requirements. F. Apiculture. 1. Street Separation. No beehive or box shall be located or maintained within one hundred fifty (150) feet of any public road, street or highway, or as determined by the community development director. 2. Apiary Location. A beehive or box shall be located or maintained a safe distance from an urbanized area. For the purpose of this section, an urbanized area is defined as an area containing PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 23 three (3) or more dwelling units per acre. As the size of the area increases, the number of dwelling units must increase proportionately by a minimum of (3) three dwelling units per acre. A "reasonable distance" shall be determined after investigation by the community development director. Decisions of the community development director may be appealed pursuant to Section 17.44.090. 3. Dwelling Separation. No beehive or box shall be located or maintained within four hundred (400) feet of any dwelling on adjacent property. 4. Property Line Separation. No apiary shall be located or maintained within fifty (50) feet of any property line common to other property except that it may be adjoining the property line when such other property contains an apiary, or upon mutual agreement for such location with the adjoining property owner. 5. Water. Available adequate and suitable water supply shall be maintained on the property near the apiaries at all times. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -2), 1994) Section 17.28.040 Auto, boat and trailer sales lots. New and used automobile, trailer and boat sales yards are subject to the following conditions: A. No repair or reconditioning of automobiles, trailers or boats shall be permitted unless such work is accessory to the principal retail use and is done entirely within an enclosed building. B. Except for required landscaping, the entire open area of the premises shall be surfaced with concrete or asphaltic concrete. Section 17.28.050 Reserved. Section 17.28.060 Reserved. Section 17.28.070 Produce stands. A. One (1) sales produce stand per lot is allowed. B. The produce stand shall be accessory to the permitted plant production on the same lot, and only if at least ninety -five percent (95 %) of the area of the lot is devoted to plant production. C. A produce stand may sell raw unprocessed fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, cut flowers, and ornamental plants grown on the same lot and on other lots, under the same ownership, which are located in the city. D. The floor area of the produce stand shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet. E. The produce stand shall be setback at least thirty (30) feet from any public road, street or highway. This setback area shall be kept free and clear of impediments in order to provide an area for off - street parking. F. The construction thereof shall be of a temporary nature and shall not include a permanent foundation. G. One (1) freestanding sign a maximum height of eight (8) feet and a maximum of thirty - two (32) square feet and one (1) sign attached to the produce stand, in addition to signs otherwise allowed on the property pursuant to Chapter 17.40, are allowed. Section 17.28.080-17.28.110 Reserved. Section 17.28.120 Motion picture and TV production, temporary. Such outdoor filming shall not result in high or unreasonable levels of light, glare or noise being directed toward neighboring properties, and shall not cause disturbances in normal traffic flows, nor cause damage to flora or fauna. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits and approvals from the city and other city departments, and shall restore the property to its original condition when such filming is completed. The time limits stated in Chapter 17.20 for temporary filming apply to individual lots. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -11), 1994) Section 17.28.130 Outdoor sales and services, temporary. Such uses are permitted for one (1) calendar day in any ninety (90) day period, provided that they do not disrupt normal traffic flows and do not result in the blocking of public rights -of -way, PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 24 parking lot aisles or required parking spaces. All related facilities and materials shall be removed on the departure of the use. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -12), 1994) Section 17.28.140 Christmas tree sales. The outdoor sale of trees and wreaths for festive or ornamental purposes is permitted during the forty-five (45) day period immediately preceding December 25th. Such sales activities shall not disrupt normal traffic flows, nor result in the blocking of public rights -of -way, parking lot aisles or required parking spaces. All related structures, facilities and materials shall be removed by December 31 st of the same year. Christmas tree sales are allowed one (1) temporary, unlighted identification sign not exceeding twenty (20) square feet in area. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -13), 1994) Section 17.28.150 Temporary buildings during construction. A mobilehome, recreational vehicle or commercial coach may be used as a temporary dwelling unit or office on a construction site in accordance with Section 17.20.060, provided that a building permit for such construction is in full force and effect on the same site. The unit shall be connected to a water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the Ventura County environmental health division, and shall be removed from the site within forty -five (45) days after a clearance for occupancy is issued by the city department of building and safety. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -14), 1994) Section 17.28.160 Storage of building materials, temporary. The temporary storage of construction materials is permitted on a lot adjacent to one on which a valid zoning clearance and building permit allowing such construction is in force, or on a project site within a recorded subdivision. Such storage is permitted during construction and for forty -five (45) days thereafter. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -15), 1994) Section 17.28.170 — 17.28.230 Reserved. Section 17.28.240 Bicycle and Skate Parks. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish reasonable and uniform limitations, safeguards and controls for the design, placement and use of facilities and structures (hereinafter referred to as "Facilities ") for bicycles and skates such as, but not limited to: skateboards, bicycles, unicycles, tricycles and roller skates. Such regulations are established to minimize the impact on neighboring uses such as, but not limited to: unsightly structures, noise, loss of privacy, traffic congestion, trespassing, and risk of damage or injury from flying projectiles and debris. B. Application. 1. Facilities less than forty -two (42) inches in height above adjacent finished grade level, which cover less than thirty -two (32) square feet of aggregate ground area, and do not have a platform on which to stand, are exempt from the requirements of subsections C through I of this section. Such exempt Facilities must otherwise meet the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 2. Those Facilities not exempt may be permitted upon issuance of a zoning clearance provided all standards of this title are met. 3. Facilities that exceed the standards set forth in subsections C through G of this section may be authorized by a conditional use permit approved by the director of community development. C. Size. No point on a Facility shall extend more than eight (8) feet above adjacent finished grade level and no Facility or collection of Facilities on a given lot shall cover more than four hundred (400) square feet of aggregate ground area. D. Setbacks. All Facilities shall be set back the following distances from all other structures and property lines: 1. All Facilities shall be set back a minimum of six (6) feet from all other structures. 2. All Facilities shall be set back a minimum of twenty (20) feet from all property lines with an additional five (5) feet of setback required for each one (1) foot increase of height over six (6) PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 25 feet above adjacent finished grade level. 3. Facilities shall not be located in the area between the public or private right -of -way and the front of any building on the site, unless the Facility is not visible from the public or private right -of -way or neighboring building and otherwise conforms to the applicable setback requirements. E. Construction Standards. All Facilities shall be constructed so as to minimize visual and auditory impacts. 1. The sides of all Facilities that are above ground, not including any rails, shall be enclosed with a solid material, such as plywood. 2. Spaces between finished grade and the lower, horizontal surfaces of the Facility shall be filled with earth or other suitable solid material. 3. The backs of all surfaces not affected by subsection (E)(2) of this section shall be padded with sound - absorbing material such as carpeting. 4. Facilities may be painted, stained, or left in their natural finish. Posters, banners, handbills, bumper stickers, or signs of any kind shall not be affixed to the Facility, if visible from neighboring properties. Signage for the Facilities shall be in accordance with Chapter 17.40. F. Hours of Operation. The use of Facilities shall be limited to daylight hours between nine (9:00) a.m. and seven (7:00) p.m., Monday through Saturday. G. Maintenance. Facilities shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and orderly manner. H. Removal. Facilities shall be removed within ninety (90) days when no longer used, or capable of being safely used for their intended purpose. 1. Hold Harmless. The permittee shall provide the city with a hold harmless agreement, acceptable to the city, prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, which provides, in substance, that the permittee agrees to hold the city harmless, indemnify and defend the city for any loss or damage to property, or injury or loss of life arising out of the use authorized by this zoning clearance. Section 17.28.250 Reserved. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC 17.28 Ordinance No. Page 26 Sections: 17.44.010 17.44.020 17.44.030 17.44.040 17.44.050 17.44.060 17.44.070 17.44.080 17.44.090 17.44.100 Chapter 17.44 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES Purpose. Legal lot requirement. Zoning clearances. Discretionary permits and exceptions. Amendments to the general plan, specific plans, zoning map, and zoning code. Filing and processing of applications. Public hearing procedures. Decisions. Appeals. Modification, suspension and revocation. Section 17.44.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish review procedures for land -use entitlement applications including permits and variances; and applications to amend or adopt the general plan, specific plans, the zoning map or zoning ordinance. Section 17.44.020 Legal lot requirement. No entitlement shall be granted or permit be issued for construction on a lot, which is not a legal lot, as defined by the state Subdivision Map Act and the subdivision ordinance. Section 17.44.030 Zoning Clearance. A. Purpose. A zoning clearance is a permit that is granted on the basis of a ministerial decision by the community development director or designee without a hearing. A zoning clearance certifies that a proposed use of land or structures meets all requirements of this title and the applicable conditions of any previously approved discretionary planned development permit, administrative permit and/or conditional use permit. B. Applicability. Except as provided in chapter 17.20, a zoning clearance is required prior to the implementation of uses of land or structures, construction requiring building permits, and the commencement of any activity authorized by a permit or subdivision granted in accordance with the zoning and subdivision ordinances of the city. A zoning clearance shall be issued if the proposed uses of land or structures: 1. Are permissible under the present zoning on the land and the city's zoning and subdivision ordinances, planned development permit or conditional use permit; 2. Are compatible with the policies and land use designations specified in the general plan, and any applicable specific plan; 3. Comply with the applicable terms and conditions of any applicable permit or other entitlement; 4. Are not located on the same site where a violation of this municipal code exists or are not in violation of the terms of an existing permit covering the site or structure, unless the zoning clearance is necessary to abate the violation; 5. Are not being requested by or on a site where there are outstanding entitlement, processing or condition compliance fees owed to the city; and 6. Are consistent with the portions of the county hazardous waste management plan that identify specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. C. Expiration. Zoning clearances shall expire one hundred eighty (180) days after issuance, unless otherwise indicated by the community development director on the clearance or unless the use of land or PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 n ^, Resolution No. 2003 — Page 27 structures or building construction has commenced and is being diligently pursued, as evidenced by current inspections and/or valid building permits. Section 17.44.040 Discretionary permits and exceptions. The following discretionary permits and exceptions are authorized by this title. If more than one discretionary permit or exception application is required for a proposed use or structure, the community development director may require all applications for the proposed use or structure to be filed, processed, considered, and decided concurrently through the most stringent decision - making process and by the highest decision - making authority of the permits and/or exceptions requested. A. Temporary Use Permit (TUP). A temporary use permit is required prior to initiation of uses or structures in a given zone as specified by chapter 17.20 of this title that are to be established for a temporary period of time (not to exceed ninety (90) days). Temporary use permit applications require review and approval by the community development director to assure compliance with the requirements of this title, and may be conditioned to protect the health, safety, life, or property of the applicant or the public. One additional ninety (90) day extension to a temporary use permit may be granted. A temporary use permit may be revoked by the community development director prior to the expiration date based upon information that the conditions have not been met, or to protect the health, safety, life, or property of the applicant or the public. B. Administrative Permit (AP). An administrative permit is required prior to the initiation of uses and structures in a given zone as specified in chapter 17.20 of this title where review and approval by the community development director is required to assure compliance with the provisions of the Moorpark Municipal Code. An administrative permit application is subject to site plan and architectural review. Notice of a pending decision on an administrative permit shall be mailed by the community development director to the adjacent owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the decision. Public comments concerning compliance of the proposed use or structure with the general plan, municipal code, or other applicable regulations will be accepted during the period before the date of the decision. After the comment period has ended, the community development director may approve the permit, deny the permit, or approve the permit subject to conditions necessary for the proposed use or structure to comply with the general plan, municipal code, and any other applicable regulations. C. Planned Development (PD) Permit. A planned development permit is required prior to initiation of uses and structures in a given zone as specified in chapter 17.20 of this title where review by the planning commission and city council through a public hearing process is required to assure the project design complies with the provisions of this title and the general plan, and is compatible with neighboring properties. A planned development permit application is subject to site plan and architectural review and may be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. Heights, setbacks, sizes, locations, architectural styles and colors of all proposed buildings, structures and other on -site improvements, landscaping design, neighborhood design, and permitted land uses shall be established as part of the planned development permit review and approval process. Any change to the initial permitted land uses shall require a modification consistent with the requirements of section 17.44.100. The planning commission and city council shall each hold at least one (1) public hearing on any planned development permit application. Following a public hearing, the planning commission shall make a written recommendation to the city council whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. The city council shall be the decision authority for all planned development permits. Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying an application for a planned development permit, the city council shall adopt written findings, by resolution, based upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify the decision. In order for a planned development permit to be approved, the city council shall find that: 1. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping, is consistent with the provisions of the general plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations; PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 �,,� Resolution No. 2003 — Page 28 2. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area; and 3. The proposed uses are compatible with existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area. D. Conditional Use Permit (CUP). A conditional use permit is required prior to initiation of uses in a given zone as specified by chapter 17.20 of this title where review by the planning commission and city council through a public hearing process is required to determine if the proposed use complies with all necessary findings listed in this subsection. A conditional use permit is not allowed as a matter of right, but is subject to site plan and architectural review and may be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying an application for a conditional use permit, the city council shall adopt written findings, by resolution, based upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify the decision. In order for a conditional use permit to be approved, the city council shall find that: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the general plan, zoning ordinance, and any other applicable regulations; 2. The proposed use is compatible with both existing and permitted land uses in the surrounding area; 3. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character, and design of surrounding properties; 4. The proposed use would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses; and 5. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 6. Additional Finding for Hazardous Waste Facilities. The following additional finding is required for the approval of conditional use permits for hazardous waste facilities: a. The proposed hazardous waste facility is consistent with the portions of the county hazardous waste management plan that identify specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. 7. Additional Findings for Establishments Selling Alcoholic Beverages. The following additional findings are required for the approval of conditional use permits for establishments selling alcoholic beverages: a. The use will not result in an over concentration in the area of establishments selling alcoholic beverages; b. The use will serve a public convenience; C. The use will not create the need for increased police services; d. The requested use at the proposed location will not adversely affect the economic welfare of the community; and e. The exterior appearance of the structure will not be inconsistent with the external appearance of commercial structures already constructed or under construction on surrounding properties, or within the immediate neighborhood so as to cause blight, deterioration or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. E. Variance. A variance is an adjustment in the regulations contained in this title. A variance is based on discretionary decisions and may be granted to allow deviations from ordinance regulations governing such development factors as setbacks, height, lot coverage, lot area and width, signs, off - street parking, landscaping and wall, fencing and screening standards. A variance shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of this title. A variance may not be granted to authorize a use or activity as a substitute to an amendment to these zoning regulations. Except when a variance is filed as part of a planned development permit, conditional use permit and as provided in subsection F. of this section, variance requests shall be heard and decided by the planning commission through a public hearing process. Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying an application for a variance, the planning commission shall adopt written findings, by resolution, based upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify the decision. In order for a variance to be approved, the decision - making authority shall find that: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 F; v� Resolution No. 2003 — Page 29 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations denies the property owner privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts; and 2. The granting the requested variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and 3. The strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property will result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations; and 4. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties; and 5. The granting of a variance in conjunction with a hazardous waste facility will be consistent with the portions of the county's hazardous waste management plan (CHWMP) that identify specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. F. Administrative Exception. 1. An administrative exception may be granted by the community development director for minor adjustments to the zoning regulations. An administrative exception may be granted only in the following situations: a. To allow a decrease of up to twenty percent (20 %) in any required minimum setback, provided that such exception may be granted only once from the minimum standard adopted by this code or any planned development permit approved consistent with this code; b. To allow walls, fences or hedges to exceed the height limit regulations by a maximum of one (1) foot in setback areas, except in a required sight triangle; C. To allow an increase up to ten percent (10 %) for maximum building coverage, sign area or sign height; d. To allow up to a five- percent (5 %) decrease in the required lot area for second units. 2. A notice of a pending decision on an administrative exception shall be mailed out to the adjacent owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the decision. Public comments concerning the administrative exception will be accepted during the period before the date of the decision. After the comment period has ended, the community development director may approve the exception, deny the exception, or approve the exception subject to conditions, if necessary for the exception to comply with the general plan, municipal code, and any other applicable regulations. The director's decision is final unless appealed within ten (10) day in accordance with section 17.44.090. In the approval of an administrative exception the director shall find that: a. The granting of the exception will not create negative impacts to abutting properties; and b. The strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property will result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations; and C. The granting of the exception is consistent with the general plan and/or any applicable specific plan. Section 17.44.050 Amendments to the general plan, specific plans, zoning map, and zoning code. A. Authori . The adoption or amendment of a general plan clement or map, specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance is a legislative act. The planning commission and city council shall each hold at least one (1) public hearing on any general plan, specific plan, or zoning amendment request. Following a public hearing, the planning commission shall make a written recommendation to the city council whether to approve, approve in modified form, or disapprove any proposed amendment. The city council shall be the decision authority for all general plan amendments, specific plans, and zoning amendment requests. B. Initiation. Proposals to amend the general plan, any specific plan, the zoning map or zoning PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 30 code may be initiated by either of the following methods: 1. By the owner or the owners agent of the affected property filing an application with the community development director. 2. By the adoption of a resolution of intent by the city council either directly or upon the recommendation of either the planning commission or the community development director. C. Pre- Screenine. Applications for general plan amendments proposed pursuant to Section 17.44.050(B)(1) shall only be accepted following successful completion of a pre - screening application review as established by resolution of the city council. D. Study of Additional Area. The community development director, upon review of an application or resolution of intention for an amendment to the general plan map, any specific plan map, or zoning map may elect to process the study of additional areas for amendment concurrently with the amendment request. Section 17.44.060 Filing and processing of applications. A. Submission of Applications. An application for a zoning clearance, discretionary permit or variance, or an amendment or adoption of a general plan element or map, specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance may be filed by the owner of the affected property or by an agent authorized by the affected property owner. The application shall be filed with the community development director, conform to the requirements of this title, contain all required materials and information prescribed by the forms supplied by the community development director, and be accompanied by the appropriate processing fees as established by city council resolution. B. Fees. 1. Payment at Time of Application Submittal. Each application request shall be accompanied by payment of the required fee established by Resolution of city council. No filing fee shall be charged or collected for any application or appeal filed and signed by two planning commissioners or any individual city councilmember in their official capacity. 2. Reimbursement for Code Enforcement Activities. Where a use has commenced, or construction has begun prior to the granting of any required zoning clearance, discretionary permit or exception, or amendment or adoption of a general plan element or map, specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance, the applicant shall submit additional fees to cover the costs associated with code enforcement activities at the time the application is submitted as determined by the community development director. Payment of such additional fees shall not relieve persons from fully complying with the requirements of this code, nor from any other penalties prescribed herein. 3. Failure to Pay. In the event that all fees and charges have not been paid prior to action on the permit or variance the community development director shall include, as a condition of approval, the requirement to pay all outstanding fees and charges consistent with the adopted city council fee resolution. C. Existing Violations. No application pursuant to this title shall be accepted for processing if there is an existing violation of the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or municipal code on the affected lot or building, until the violation is abated, unless the community development director has determined that acceptance of the application is necessary to abate the existing violation. D. Reapplication. No application pursuant to this title shall be accepted for processing for one (1) year after a denial decision has become effective on a similar application as determined by the community development director. E. Content of Applications. The content of applications shall be determined by the community development director and may include, but not be limited to site plans, building or structure elevations (in color with building materials identified), floor plans, samples of exterior finishing materials, and identification of development phases, if any. F. Completeness of Application. A determination as to the completeness of an application pursuant to this title shall be made by the community development director and the applicant shall be notified in writing of this determination no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the city has accepted an PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 31 application under this title. Legislative acts, such as general plan amendments, zoning ordinance amendments, zone changes, amendments to specific plans, specific plan adoption, and development agreements, are not subject to this requirement. Upon written notification to the applicant, processing of an incomplete application may be terminated if no reasonable effort has been made by the applicant to complete the application for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of notification of incompleteness. All unused fees shall be refunded to the applicant. An extension to this ninety (90) day period may be granted by the community development director upon written request by the applicant showing good cause. G. Review and Conditioning of Applications. 1. Agency Review. The community development director or designee may solicit comments and recommendations on a permit or variance application from any city department, permitting agency, service provider, and other interested party as deemed appropriate by the director or designee for the specific application. 2. Consultant Review. The community development director or designee may refer any application request to an independent, qualified consultant for review and evaluation of issues beyond the expertise or staffing capabilities of the city. The costs for all such consultant work combined with the administrative charge in effect at the time for management of the consultant contract shall be borne by the applicant and are independent of the fees paid to the city for the processing of the application request. 3. Securities. Except as otherwise specified in this title, the decision - making authority may require a performance security on any discretionary entitlement as a condition of such entitlement. The security(ies) shall be filed in a form acceptable to the city attorney and certified by the city clerk. a. The required amount of the security(ies) may be increased periodically by the community development director in order to compensate for inflation (based on the applicable regional Consumer Price Index) or other factors, so that the same relative value of the security is maintained over the life of the permit, and to assure that performance securities continue to reflect the actual anticipated costs for completing a required task. No security shall be released until after all of the applicable conditions of the permit have been met. b. In the event of any failure by the applicant to perform or comply with any term or condition of a discretionary entitlement, the decision - making authority may, after notice to the applicant and after a public hearing, determine by resolution the amount of the penalty, and declare all or part of the security forfeited. The applicant will be jointly and severally obligated to pay forthwith the full amount of the forfeiture to the city. The forfeiture of any security shall not insulate the applicant from liability in excess of the sum of the security for damages or injury, nor from expense or liability suffered by the city from any breach by the applicant of any term or condition of the discretionary entitlement or of any applicable ordinance or of the security. C. The applicant shall maintain the minimum specified amount of a penal security throughout the life of the entitlement. Within thirty (30) days of any forfeiture of a penalty security, the applicant shall restore the security to the required level. 4. Abandoned Oil/Gas Wells. All applications will be reviewed for the location over or near any abandoned or idle - deserted oil or gas well, based on maps provided by the State of California Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (D.O.G.G.R.). The city will notify D.O.G.G.R. of the location of any proposed project that is found to be over or near any such well(s). H. Continuance of Permit During_ Application Renewal Process. Unless otherwise provided in the conditions of the permit or variance, permits and variances being processed for renewal shall remain in full force and effect until the renewal request is acted on and all administrative appeals have been exhausted, provided that the renewal application was accepted as complete by the city prior to the expiration of the permit. All the terms and conditions of the permit or variance shall continue to be in full force and effect. Section 17.44.070 Public hearing procedures. A. Notice. For applications pursuant to this title requiring a public hearing before the city council or planning commission, the community development director shall prepare a public hearing notice. The notice shall include the date, time and place of the hearing, the identity of the hearing body or officer, a PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 `"� Resolution No. 2003 — Page 32 general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a general description, in text or by diagram, of the location of the real property, if any, that is the subject of the hearing. 1. Publication. The community development director shall give notice of the public hearing, consistent with the requirements of this section by publication at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the city, unless otherwise required by State or Federal statute. 2. Mailing. The community development director shall mail the notice of the public hearing on permit or variance applications pursuant to Government Code Section 65091, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notices shall be mailed to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within one - thousand (1,000) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor's parcel(s) subject to the hearing for all applications except applications affecting property completely within the downtown specific plan boundaries and applications affecting one (1) single - family residence, where notices shall be mailed to owners of real property, as identified on the latest adjusted Ventura County Tax Assessor Roles, within three - hundred (300) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor's parcel(s) subject to the hearing. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed is greater than 1,000, the community development director may provide notice by placing a display advertisement of at least one - eighth page in a newspaper of general circulation within the city at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the hearing. In the case of appeal hearings, notice shall also be mailed to the appellant and the decision - making authority whose order, requirement, permit, decision or determination is the subject of the appeal at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the hearing. 3. Sien. a. At least eleven (11) calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing, the applicant shall install at least one non - illuminated sign on the subject property to notice the hearing. The sign shall be thirty -two (32) square feet in area, not exceed eight (8) feet in height, and be placed in an area of the property most visible to the public, not more than five (5) feet from the front property line in residential areas, and not more than one (1) foot from the front property line in commercial and industrial areas. At least one (1) sign for every five hundred (500) feet of street frontage shall be displayed per street frontage of the subject property. The community development director may reduce the number of signs, however the reduction shall be no less than one sign per street frontage. b. The heading of the sign shall state: "Notice of public hearing on proposed development (fill in the application name provided by the community development director) Case No. (fill in the case number provided by the community development director)." The content of the sign shall describe the type of project (residential, industrial or commercial), including the square footage, number of units, etc. Adjectives such as "luxurious" or "elegant" shall not be used. The date, time and location of the public hearing, and the telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of the developer and of case planner assigned to the application shall also be included on the sign. The public hearing sign shall not contain any additional information unless approved by the community development director. C. The sign shall be removed from the property not more than twelve (12) calendar days after the final action by the city on the application. B. Hearing Process. For all discretionary entitlement applications with the exception of administrative permits, temporary use permits, and administrative exceptions, the decision - making authority(ies) shall hold at least one (1) public hearing. At least three (3) working days prior to such hearing, the community development director shall prepare a report on the project, along with any recommendations, and provide copies of the report to the decision - making authority, the applicant and parties requesting copies of the report. Presentation of the director's report and the public hearing process shall follow the hearing process as described in the adopted rules of the planning commission and city council. C. Referral for Information, Report, or Stud X. The planning commission may refer an application back to the community development director for further report, information, or study. The city council may refer a matter back to the planning commission or the community development director for further report, information or study. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 L �3 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 33 Section 17.44.080 Decisions. A. Decision Options. The decision - making authority reviewing an application for a discretionary permit or exception may approve, conditionally approve, deny or modify, wholly or partly, the application being reviewed. The authority may impose such conditions and limitations as it deems necessary to assure that the general purpose and intent of this title and the Moorpark Municipal Code will be observed. All conditions and restrictions applied to a decision on an application shall automatically continue to govern and limit the subject use or structure unless the action of the decision - making authority clearly indicates otherwise or the action of the decision - making authority is appealed. B. Time Limits. All decisions on applications made pursuant to this title shall be made in compliance with applicable time limits set forth by State law under the Permit Streamlining Act as most recently amended, to the extent such applies, unless a mutually agreed -upon extension is approved by the community development director and applicant as permitted by the Permit Streamlining Act. C. Notice of Decision. The community development director shall notify the applicant of a decision by the planning commission within thirty (30) calendar days following the effective date of a decision. The city clerk shall notify the applicant of a decision by the city council within thirty (30) calendar days following the effective date of a decision. The notification shall be provided in writing and transmitted via U.S. mail or in an electronic format, such as through the internet or by facsimile. In the case of appeals, the authority whose decision is the subject of an appeal shall also be notified of the decision. D. Effective Date of Decisions. 1. A decision by the community development director or planning commission is effective ten (10) calendar days from the date of decision unless an appeal is filed with the community development director. 2. A decision of the city council is effective on the date it is rendered. E. Effect of an Appeal. Neither the applicant nor any enforcement agency may rely on an authority's decision until the expiration of the decision -maker authority's appeal period or until the appeal has been resolved, whichever occurs later in accordance with section 17.44.090. Actions by the decision - making authority are stayed pending the consideration of the appeal. F. Expiration and Time Extension. Unless otherwise specified in this title or in the permit or exception conditions, any discretionary permit or exception included in Section 17.44.040 shall expire one (1) year from the date of approval unless the use is inaugurated in accordance with this title and the application conditions. The applicant is solely responsible for the timely renewal of any application. The city has no obligation to notify the applicant of the imminent expiration of the application. An application for a time extension shall be filed with the community development director at least ninety (90) calendar days prior to the date of expiration. The time extension application shall be filed on the forms supplied by the community development director and shall be accompanied by the submittal requirements specified by the director and the appropriate filing fee. The time extension process shall conform to the process for the original permit or exception identified in section 17.44.060. In considering a request for a time extension, the decision - making body may approve the request, deny the request, or modify or add to any conditions of approval originally imposed due to changed circumstances since the permit or exception was originally considered. Section 17.44.090 Appeals. A. Authorit.�to Appeal. 1. All actions and decisions of the community development director authorized by this title, unless otherwise pre - empted, may be appealed by any person to the planning commission. The appellant shall file the appeal in writing, along with the applicable fee, with the community development director. The appellant shall state the reasons for the appeal and relate the reasons to the required findings for approval of the application. 2. All actions and decisions of the community development director authorized by this title may be appealed by any person to the planning commission. All actions of the planning commission PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 34 authorized by this title may be appealed by any person to the city council. The appellant shall file the appeal in writing, along with the applicable fee, with the city clerk with a copy of the appeal filed with the community development director. The appellant shall state the reasons for the appeal and relate the reasons to the required findings for approval of the application. 3. The planning commission is the final authority on appeals of the community development director, unless the action is appealed to the city council within the required time limits of section 17.44.090B. The city council is the final approval authority for appeals of planning commission actions when filed within the time limits of section 17.44.090B. B. Time Limits. All appeals shall be filed with the appropriate designated person as specified above no later than the close of business ten (10) calendar days after the date of the final action of the decision - making authority. If the tenth calendar day after the date of final action occurs on a day that the city is closed for business, the appeal may be filed before the close of business on the next day that the city is open for business. C. Fees. Persons filing appeals shall pay all applicable fees in effect at the time of the appeal as established by Resolution of the city council, unless exempt per Section 17.44.060(B)(1). No fee shall be required when the item is appealed by a city councilmember. D. Appeal Process. 1. The appellate body shall review the project application in the same form as reviewed by the original decision maker and the review shall be conducted de novo. 2. An appeal shall be subject to the same type of public action process (i.e., action item without public hearing or public hearing item) and public noticing as required for the original project application. 3. An appeal shall be scheduled for the next available regular meeting of the appellate body following completion of the required legal notice provisions. Section 17.44.100 Modification, suspension and revocation. A. Modification of Permits. An application for modification of an approved discretionary permit or approved variance pursuant to this section may be filed by any person or entity listed in Section 17.44.060(A). Any change of an approved discretionary permit is also a discretionary decision and shall be classified into one (1) of the following three (3) categories: 1. Permit Adjustment. Any change which would not alter any of the findings pursuant to this title, nor any findings contained in the environmental documentation prepared for the permit, and would not have any adverse impact on surrounding properties, may be deemed a permit adjustment and acted upon by the community development director or designee without a hearing. Any change shall conform to the development requirements of this title or adopted specific plan. Such changes many include, but are not limited to, the following: a. A maximum of ten percent (10 %) increase or decrease in floor area but not more or less than five thousand (5,000) square feet, respectively; b. A maximum of ten percent (10 %) increase or decrease in the area or height of walls, fences or similar structures used as screening; C. A maximum of ten percent (10 %) increase or decrease in provision for landscaping or similar standards or dimensions; d. Internal remodeling or minor exterior architectural changes or embellishments involving no change in basic architectural style; e. A change in use where the new use requires the same or a lesser permit than the approved or existing use; or the establishment of a new use in an unoccupied building for which a permit has been granted. 2. Permit Modification. Any proposed change that exceeds the criteria of a permit adjustment, but is not extensive enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in the approved PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 Resolution No. 2003 — Page 35 entitlement or use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties, and would not change any findings contained in the environmental documentation prepared for the permit, may be deemed a permit modification by the community development director. Action on the permit modification application shall be by the decision - making body that approved the original permit by the same type of public action process (i.e., action item without public hearing or public hearing item) and public noticing as required for the original project application. 3. New Permit Required. Any proposed modification that does not meet the criteria for a permit adjustment or permit modification shall require a new permit application. B. Suspension Modification or Revocation for Cause. Any permit or variance heretofore or hereafter granted may be revoked, modified or its use suspended, by the same decision - making authority and procedure which would approve the permit or variance under this title. Prior to taking any action the applicant shall be given notice by U.S. Mail at least ten (10) business days prior to the date of the proposed revocation, modification, or suspension and have an opportunity to be heard by the issuing body prior to any such revocation, modification or suspension. An application for such modification, suspension or revocation may be filed, along with applicable fees, by any person. The applicant for such modification, suspension or revocation shall have the burden of proving one (1) or more of the following causes: 1. The application request, which was submitted, was not in full, true and correct form. 2. The entitlement for which an approval was granted does not comply with the terms and conditions of the entitlement. 3. The entitlement was issued erroneously. 4. The project is not in compliance with terms or conditions of the permit or variance; 5. The project subject to the permit or variance, or any portion thereof, is or has been used or maintained in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; 6. The use for which the permit or variance was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned; 7. The use for which the permit or variance was granted has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare or as to constitute a nuisance; 8. Changes in technology, or in the type or amount of development in the vicinity of the use, or other good cause warrants modification of conditions of operation or imposition of additional conditions of operation to assure that the use remains compatible with existing and potential uses of other property within the general area in which the use is located. C. Non - waiver. The failure of the community development director, planning commission or city council to revoke a variance or permit, or to suspend its use, whenever cause therefore exists or occurs, does not constitute a waiver of such right with respect to any subsequent cause for revocation or suspension of the use. D. Prohibition. No person shall carry on any of the operations authorized to be performed under the terms of any permit or variance during any period of suspension thereof, or after the revocation thereof, or pending a judgment of court upon any application for writ taken to review the decision or order of the final appeal body in the city in suspending or revoking such permit or variance; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the performance of such operations as may be necessary in connection with a diligent and bona fide effort to cure and remedy the default, noncompliance or violation, for which a suspension of the permit or variance was ordered by the applicable city entity, or such operations as may be required by other laws and regulations for the safety of persons and the protection and preservation of property. PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SEC. 17.44 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -450 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 17.20 (USES BY ZONE), 17.28 (STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES), 17.44 (ENTITLEMENT - PROCESS AND PROCEDURES), 17.60 (AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLANS, ZONING MAP AND ZONING CODE) AND CHAPTER 17.68 (PUBLIC NOTICES) OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, on October 16, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96 -1237 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to allowing recreation vehicle storage in the Commercial Planned Development (CPD) zone; and WHEREAS, on January 7, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 98 -1423 directing the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to revisions to provide for outdoor seating for restaurants; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2002, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to permitted size of second dwelling units; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2002, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to study, set a public hearing, and provide a recommendation pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Code related to entitlement and uses; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public workshop on the entitlement and use regulations contained in Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60, 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and gave direction to Community Development staff on potential amendments to the regulations; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department drafted proposed amendments to the entitlement and use regulations in response to direction from the Planning Commission; and CC ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -450 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed this project and found it to qualify for a General Rule Exemption in accordance with Section 15061 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), and based upon that finding has determined the project to be exempt from further environmental documentation; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 17, 2003, and July 1, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a duly- noticed public hearing on proposed amendments to Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60 and 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to entitlement and use regulations, received public testimony on the proposed amendments, and after receiving oral and written public testimony, closed the public hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council adoption of an ordinance to amend Chapters 17.20, 17.28, 17.44, 17.60 and 17.68 of the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to entitlement and use regulations of the Moorpark Municipal Code as recommended by staff and modified by the Commission as shown as Exhibits A, B, and C attached. SECTION 2. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -450 Page 3 The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Pozza and Lauletta, Vice Chair DiCecco and Chair Landis NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioner Peskay PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF July, 2003. Kipp A. Landis, Chair ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit "A ": Amended Chapter 17.20 Exhibit "B ": Amended Chapter 17.28 Exhibit "C ": Amended Chapter 17.44 14 17.20.010 Chapter 17.20 USES BY ZONE Sections: 17.20.010 Purpose. 17.20.020 Use of matrices. 17.20.030 Uses not listed. 17.20.040 Exemptions from zoning clearance. 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural and special purpose zones. 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. 17.20.010 Purpose. Sections 17.20.050 and 17.20.060 list in matrix form the uses that are allowed under this title. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -0), 1994) 17.20.020 Use of matrices. A. The following symbols indicate the type of permit required for uses allowed in each zone (unless otherwise indicated in city council Resolution No. 88 -523): [Blank] Not permitted ♦ Permitted by zone clearance ■ Administrative permit • Planning commission - approved planned development permit City council- approved planned development permit O Planning commission - approved conditional use permit 0 City council - approved conditional use permit NOTE: Approvals subject to change by city ordinance. All uses located in the M -1 and M -2 zone which are adjacent to residential zoned property shall require a city council - approved conditional use permit prior to occupancy of the building. Exception: All development permits or zone clearances approved prier to the ordinance codified in this title shall continue as legally conforming including those approved and not yet built or occupied. However, after a five (5) year period from adoption of the ordinance codified in this title, this exemption shall no longer be valid and all existing development and occupancies shall become legal - nonconforming. Thereafter, all changes of uses shall conform to Section 17.52.040C which states that, '"The discontinuance for a period of one hundred eighty (180) or more days of the nonconforming use, or a change of nonconforming use to a conforming use, constitutes aban- donment and termination status of the use, and therefore, new uses shall be required to conform to the conditional use permit requirement." 308 -1 (Moorpark 12 -98) CC ATTACHMENT 3 �, , B. Uses shown in the matrix legend as "Permitted" require a zoning clearance unless exempted under Section 17.20.040. C. Each use is subject to all of the provisions of this title. D. For the purposes of this chapter, any use listed in matrix form which is indented shall be construed as a subheading of the heading under which it is indented. E. Any use requested as an accessory use which is listed in the matrix at Sections 17.20.050 and 17.10.060 as a main use shall be processed in accordance with the indicated requirements of the main use. 1. Retail Sales in Industrial Zones. Retail sales may be allowed in industrial zones under the following provi- sions: a. That the areas used for retail may not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the entire floor area of the building; b. That in the case of an industrial complex under a single cumulative floor area of all buildings, twenty percent (20%) of the cumulative floor area may be used by any one (1) building for retail use; c. Temporary retail sales may be allowed under the provisions of the temporary use permit and must exhibit verification of State Board of Equalization sellers permit. The temporary permit shall be granted upon the stipulation that the sales activity occur no more than once per month and not on more than three (3) consecutive days; d. Subsections (E)(1)(a) and (E)(1)(b) shall be allowed only as a modification to the original development permit. In the case of a nonexistent development permit, one shall be required. F. The abbreviations used in Sections 17.20.050 and 17.20.060 are to be interpreted as follows: agric. — agriculture GFA — gross floor area H &SC — Health and Safety Code prelim. — preliminary Sq. ft. — square feet W &IC — Welfare and Institutions Code G. In accordance widr Section 17.04.040, the only uses permitted are those listed as such in this utle.'Me following list of specifically prohibited uses is provided for informa- tional purposes, and is not intended to be comprehensive: 1. Nuclear powerplants; 2. Public polo events; 3. Racetracks for horses or motorized vehicles; 4. Stadiums; 5. The parking of motor vehicles on vacant land con- taining no principal use; 6. Retail sales from wheeled vehicles, except as permitted pursuant to Section 17.20.040R. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -1), 1994) 17.20.020 17.20.030 Uses not listed. Where a proposed land use is not identified in this chap- ter, the director of community development shall review the proposed use when requested to do so by letter and, based upon the characteristics of the use, determine which of the uses listed in this chapter, if any, is equivalent to that proposed. A. Upon a written determination by the director of community development that a proposed unlisted use is equivalent in its nature and intensity to a listed use, the proposed use shall be treated in the same manner as the listed use in determining where it is allowed, what permits are required and what standards affect its establishment. B. Determinations that specific unlisted uses are equiva- lent to listed uses shall be recorded by the planning depart- ment, and shall be considered for incorporation into the zoning ordinance in the next scheduled ordinance amend- ment. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -2), 1994) 17.20.040 Exemptions from zoning clearance. A zoning clearance is not required to be issued for the following uses, if the uses meet the requirements of Section 17.44.030(B)(1)(a) and all other provisions of this title: A. Public works projects constructed by the city or its contractors; B. OnWory maintenance and minor repairs to buildings, not involving structural alterations; C. Permitted crop production, including packing, storage or preliminary processing of crops, where no structures are involved; D. Permitted underground fuel storage; E. Permitted open storage (see Chapter 17.28); F. Signs which are exempt under Section 17.40.080; G. Permitted pet and farm animals (see Section 17.20.050 and Chapter 17.28); H. The drilling of water wells for the production of water on any lot if water from said well is used only on the lot upon which the well is located; I. Patios, paving and decks (see Chapter 17.24), when constructed no more than thirty (30) inches above the surrounding finished grade; J. Fences and walls six (6) feet or less and retaining walls three (3) feet or less in height (see Chapter 17.24); K. Soil testing for wells, foundations, septic systems and similar construction; L. Swimming, wading or ornamental pools designed for a water depth of less than eighteen (18) inches; A Small public utility structures, such as electrical boxes, transformers and valve apparatus, that have no covered floor area and are attached to the ground by poles, columns or pedestals; 309 (Noorvark 1 -01) C F1 '­ \ '(c 7 �� v .. •J 17.20.040 N. Sales or leasing of commercial or industrial office space within an existing building on the same site as the unit or units being sold or leased; O. Play structures, outdoor furtriture, and the like, which are exempt from setback requirements pursuant to Section 17.24.040; P. Temporary filming that meets any of the following criteria: 1. Is for current news programs, 2. Is within an existing building, 3. Is during daylight hours for one (1) day in any seven (7) day period, provided that such filming does not involve open flames, explosives, or the construction of sets or other structures; Q. Grading, except for that which is proposed within an overlay zone and requires a discretionary pernut pursuant to Chapter 1736; R. The following types of retail sales from wheeled vehicles, subject to the requirements of all other city departments: 1. Trucks from which food is sold to employees of commercial and industrial businesses along a predetermined route, provided that such trucks are not in any location for more than one -half hour per day, and 2. Vehicles parked on the site of a permitted swap meet, carnival, outdoor festival or similar event, and selling food during such event. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -3), 1994) 17.20.050 Permitted uses in open space, agricultural and special purpose zones. Permitted uses in open space, agricultural and special purpose zones are set out in Table 17.20.050. Note: An approved residential planned development permit is required for five (5) or more lots in the RA, RO, R -1 and RE zones. The key for Table 17.20.050 is as follows: [Blank] Not permitted ♦ Permitted by zone clearance ■ Administrative permit 0 Planning commission - approved planned development permit City council- approved planned development permit O Planning commission- approved conditional use permit ® City council - approved conditional use permit Table 17.20.050 PERMITTED USES IN OPEN SPACE, AGRICULTURAL AND SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES Agriculture and agricultural operations (no retail except as indicated). Animal husbandry: Without structures' With structures: total GFA per lot: Up to 1,000 sq. ft. Over 1,000 to 5,000 sq. ft- Over 5,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. Over 20,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. Over 100,000 sq. ft. Apiculture2 Fish farms More animals than are permitted by Section 17.28.0300 Contractors2 service and storage yards and buildings Crop production' Wholesale nursery Firewood operations Greenhouse, hothouses and the like: total GFA per lot:' Up to 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. (Moorpark 1 -01) 310 OS AE RA RE RO R1 R2 RPD TP I C „'m *9 " r — . ♦ ♦ O ♦ ♦ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ♦ ♦ O C „'m *9 " r — . 20,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. Over 100,000 sq. ft. Packing or prelim. processing, within structures: total GFA per lot:' Up to 5,000 sq. ft 5,001 to 20,000 sq. ft. 20,001 to 100,000 sq. ft. Over 100,000 sq. ft. Timber growing and harvesting, and compatible uses Dwellings, farm worker (more than one per lot) Wineries Up to 2,000 sq. ft. structure 2,001 to 20,000 sq. ft_ structure Over 20,000 sq. ft. structure With public tours or tasting rooms Accessory structures To animal husbandry: Dwelling, caretaker More than one per lot Offices To crop production, including storage Dwelling, farm worker. On lots of 40 acres or more On lots less than 40 acres More than one per lot Offices Produce stands, retai12 Accessory uses, including open storage Fuel storage' Insecticides for pest control Packing, storage or prelim. processing of crops: Without structure' Airfields and landing pads and strips, private Animals, nonagricultural (see also Dwellings, accessory uses and structures)' Kennels Wild animals Boardinghouses and bed - and - breakfast inns Care facilities' (see also H &SC and W &IC) Day: Care of 12 or fewer persons (State law requirement related to day cane facilities for 7 -12) Care of 13 or more persons Intermediate: Care of 7 or more persons (see definitions) Residential: Care of 6 or fewer persons Care of 7 or more persons Cemeteries Accessory crematoria, columbaria and mausoleums Churches, synagogue and other buildings used for religious worship Clubhouses (no alcoholic beverages) 311 17.20.050 OS AE RA RE RO R1 R2 RPD TP I O O O O O SEE WITH STRUCTURES, ABOVE O O O O O O O O O SEE GREENHOUSE O O O O • • O O O O O O O O .O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O SEE WITH STRUCTURES, ABOVE O O O O O O O O O SEE GREENHOUSE O O O O O O O O O O .O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O SEE ANIMAL HUSBANDRY O O O O (Moorpark 1 -01) 0 —1-13 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (Moorpark 1 -01) 0 —1-13 17.20.050 Communications facilities Drilling, temporary geologic (testing only) Dwelling, single - family' (R -P -D zone) Mobilehome, continuing nonconforming Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 Dwellings, two-family, or two single - family dwellings' Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 Dwellings, multifamily Affordable or elderly, built pursuant to Chapter 17.64 Dwellings, accessory structures For human habitation: MobilehomeIRV as temporary dwelling during construction' Second dwelling' Room additions Not for human habitation (with or without bathroom): Second story patio /deck Accessory structure over 120 sq. ft. Over 1,000 sq. ft per structure; or over 2,000 sq. ft. per lot Antenna, ground- mounted (noncommercial), above 40 ft' Dwellings, accessory uses Animals' Apiculture' Aviaries Farm animals' (other than horses/ponies) ` Horses/ponies' Pet animals' More animals than are permitted by Section 17.28.030C Wild animals Commercial uses, minor, for project residents Home occupation Storage, open's Education and training Colleges and universities Schools, elementary and secondary (boarding and nonboarding) Energy production from renewable sources Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor Government buildings Correctional institutions Fire stations Law enforcement facilities Grading' Within an overlay zone Hospitals Hospitals for large animals Libraries (Moorpar k 1 -01) 312 OS AE RA RE RO RI R2 RPD TP I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 v 0 • 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O O O O O O O O O O O • O O O O O O O O O O O O O ® O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O SEE CHAPTER 17.36 O O O O O O O O O O O 17.20.0 -50 313 (Moorparii 6 -02) OS AE RA RE RO R1 R2 RPD TP I Mineral resource development O O O Mining and accessory uses2 O O O Less than 9 months in duration O O O O Public works maintenance ♦ ♦ ♦ Oil and gas exploration and production O O O O Mobilehome parks O O O O O O Model homes/lot sales; 2 years More than 2 years O O O O O O Motion picture and TV production, and related activities and structures O O O O O O O O O Temporary (maximum 42 days in any 180 -day period)', Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground2 O O O O O O O O O O Public utility facilities, excluding offices and service yards' O O O O O O O O O O Recreational sport and athletic facilities CampS O O O CampgroundsZ O O O O Community centers O O O O O For farm workers and nonprofit farm community organizations O O O Fields, athletic O O O O O O Geothermal spas Golf courses, except miniature Bole O O O O O O O O Parks ♦ O ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • O With buildings O O O O O O O O O Periodic outdoor sporting events ® O Recreational vehicle parks O O O Recreation projects, city- initiated 2 Caretaker recreational vehicle, accessory RetreatsZ: Without sleeping facilities O O O With sleeping facilities O O O O Riding stables O O O O With accessory lodging facilities O O Shooting ranges and gun clubs Signs (see also Section 17.20.040 and Chapter 17.40) Storage of building materials, temporary ' Trees and native vegetation: Removal, relocation or damage' Within an overlay zone SEE CHAPTER 17.36 Uses and structures, accessory (other than to agric. animals or dwellings) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ O O To a use requiring a PD permit or CUP Dwelling, caretaker SEE SECTION 17.44.080A Waste treatment and disposal O O O O O Water production, storage and distribution facilities: Private purveyors 1'4 O O O O O O O O O O Wireless communications facilities5 O O O O O O O O O O Notes for Table 17.20.050: 1. See also Section 17.20.040. 2, There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28. 3. See Chapter 17.32 for parking standard. 4. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations. 5. There are specific regulation for this use; see Chapter 17.42, including an administrative permit requirement for a pre - approved location on public property. (Ord. 278 § 4, 2002: Ord. 264 § 2 (part), 1999; Ord. 196 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (81054), 1994) 313 (Moorparii 6 -02) 17.20.060 17.20.060 Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones. Permitted uses in commercial and industrial zones are set out in Table 17.20.060. Note: All uses located in the M -1 and M -2 zones which at the property line are adjacent to residentially zoned property shall require a city council- approved conditional use permit prior to occupancy of the building. The key for Table 17.20.060 is as follows: [Blank] Not permitted Permitted by zone clearance • Planning commission- approved planned CO development permit CPD City council - approved planned development M2 permit O Planning commission- approved conditional use permit ® City council- approved conditional use permit 0 Administrative permit required Temporary use permit Table 17.20.060 PERMITTED USES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES Airfields and landing pads and strips, private Airports Alcoholic beverage9 Establishments selling beer and/or wine with an eating place Establishments selling alcoholic beverages other than beer and wine with an eating place Amusement and recreational facilities (see definitions in Ch. 17.08) Amusement parks and carnivals Arcades Batting cages and golf driving ranges, indoor Bicycle racing tracks, outdoor Health club /gymnasium (see definitions) Martial arts and dance studios Motion picture theaters, outdoor (drive -in) Racetracks (for motorized vehicles), shooting ranges and stadiums Art galleries, museums and artisan workshops Automobile repair, including component repair Automobile service stations Banks and related financial offices and institutions Barber, hairstylists, manicurists Tanning centers Bars, taverns and nightclubs' Botanical gardens Care facilities: For 7 or more persons' (see also H &SC and W &IC) Day 2.3 Intermediate and residential Care facilities: For 9 or more persons (Day) Car washes, self-service or automatic Cemeteries, columbaria and mausoleums Crematoria, accessory Churches, synagogues and other buildings used for religious worships Clubhouses With alcoholic beverages (Moorpark "2) 314 �r� r♦ .L+ .� ,q C2 CO Cl CPD MI M2 I C -OT O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 • O • O O O O O O O O • • O • • O O O PROHIBITED ♦ 10 • O • • • • • • • O O • O • O O O O O O O O O O O O O • • O O O O • O O O O • O O O O �r� r♦ .L+ .� ,q Club projects, temporary outdoor Communications facilities Radio and television broadcasting stations Conference center /convention center Contractor service and storage yards and buildings Crop productions Firewood operations Uses and structures, accessory Dwelling, farm worker (maximum one per lot) Fuel storage Offices Packing, preliminary processing, or storage of crops: Without structureS4 Produce stands, retail' Dog and cat grooming Dressmaking and tailor shops Drilling, temporary geologic (testing only) Dwelling for superintendent or owner Dwelling, caretaker Education and training Colleges and universities Schools: Elementary and secondary (nonboarding only)" Schools: Professional, vocational, art, craft and self- improvement Energy production from renewable sources Festivals and similar events, temporary outdoor Government buildings, excluding correctional institutions Fire stations Libraries and information center Grading° Within an overlay zone Grading not in conjunction with a development project Less than 5,000 cubic yards More than 5,000 cubic yards Health club /gymnasium (see definitions) Health services such as professional offices and outpatient clinics Ambulance services Hospitals Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only Hotels, motels and bed- and - breakfast inns Kennels (animal hospitals, boarding and grooming —small animals) Laboratories: research and scientific Medical and dental Laundry service (iaundromats) Laundry service (light) Libraries and information center Manufacturing associated with crafts and artisans Assembly, exhibits, demonstration Manufacturing industries Apparel and related products 315 17.20.060 • • L0, (Moorpark 1 -01) C2 CO C1 CPD M1 M2 I C -OT O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O • • O O O O • O O O O O O • O • O O O O • O • • • • • O O O • • O O O O O • • • • • O B • • • O O O SEE CHAPTER 17.36 O • • • • O O O • • O O O O • • • O • • • L0, (Moorpark 1 -01) 17.20.060 Dressmaking and tailor shops Chemicals, gases and related products (see definitions), excluding nerve gas Drugs, pharmaceuticals, perfumes, cosmetics and the like Soaps, detergents and cleaners Electrical and electronic machinery, equipment and supplies Batteries Household appliances Transmission and distribution equipment, and industrial apparatus Food and related products Alcoholic beverages Bakery products Meat, seafood and poultry packing plants Slaughtering; refining and rendering of animal fats and oils Sugar refining Furniture and related fixtures Instruments: measuring, analyzing and controlling Jewelry, silverware and plated ware Laundry service— laundromatS6 Laundry service — light' Laundry service-- heavy6 Leather and leather products Tanning, curing and finishing of hides and skins Lumber and wood products and processes Cabinet work Plywood, particleboard and veneer manufacture; wood preserving Sawmills and planing mills Machinery, except electrical Office, computing and accounting machines Metal industries, primary Rolling, drawing and extruding Metal products, fabricated Ammunition Machine shops Plating, polishing, anodizing, engraving and related operations Musical instruments, including pianos and organs Paper and related products Products from paper and paperboard, including containers Pens, pencils and other office and artists' materials Personal goods Petroleum refining and related industries Photographic, medical and optical goods, and watches and clocks Printing, publishing and related industries Print shops (up to 1,500 sq. fL of gross floor area) Rubber and plastics products Tire retreading and recapping Signs and advertising displays Stone, clay and glass products Asbestos products Cement, concrete and plaster, and products fabricated therefrom (Moorpark 1.01) 316 C2 CO C1 CPD M1 M2 I C -OT • • Z O O • O • O • O • • O • O • • • • • O • O • O O 17.20.060 317 (M 1-01) C2 CO C1 CPD Ml M2 I C -OT Glass and glassware, pressed and blown, including flat glass Glass products, made of purchased glass • • Rock crushing and sandblasting plants Textile mill products Tobacco products • Toys and amusement, sporting and athletic goods • • Transportation equipment O Motorcycles, bicycles and related parts • Martial arts and dance studios • Mineral resource development Mining and accessory uses' Less than 9 months in duration O O Public works maintenance Oil and gas exploration and production' O O Motion picture and TV production, and related activities and structures O O O O O O O Temporary (maximum 47 days in any 180 -day period)'-" ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • Offices: business, professional and administrative, except health and veterinary • • • • O • Optical goods O Organizations (professional, religious, political, labor, trade, youth, etc.) O Parks -- public ♦ Parking lots • • • • • O Pharmacy, accessory retail, for prescription pharmaceuticals only Photocopy /quick printers • Photofinishing (1 -hour photo) • Pipelines and transmission lines, aboveground O O O O Produce stands, retail • Propulsion (engine) testing Public utility facilities" O O O O O O O Offices only • • • • • O • Service yards • O Recording studios and sound stages • O O Rental and leasing of durable goods O O O Bicycle rental • Repair and reconditioning services O O • Automobile body work and painting O O O Automobile repair, including component repair O O • Electrical and electronic machinery and equipment • • Heavy machinery repair, including trucks, tractors and buses • Instruments, including musical instruments • • Office, computing and accounting machines • • Photographic and optical goods • • Repair of personal goods such as jewelry, shoes and saddlery • • Restaurants, cafes and cafeterias • Restaurants, cafes and cafeterias' temporary outside eating • • • • • Retail trade (see definitions in Chapter 17.08) includes retail -only nurseries and excludes lumber and building materials sales yards, pawnshops and liquor stores • Antique store ♦'o 317 (M 1-01) 17.20.060 Outdoor sales area Outdoor sales area temporary Retail trade (see definitions) Christmas tree sales' Feed stores Lumber and building materials sales yards Mail order houses (nonstore) Motor vehicle, mobilehome, recreational vehicle and boat dealers' Nurseries Uses and structures, accessory Outdoor sales and services, temporary' (see definitions) Repair of products retailed Salvage yards, including automobile wrecking yards Service establishments Business (see definitions) - Auction halls, not involving livestock Disinfecting and exterminating services Exhibits, building of Sign painting and lettering shops Personal (see definitions) Signs (See also Section 17.20.040 and Chapter 17.40) Freestanding off -site advertising signs Swap meets Taxidermy Transportation services (see definitions) Bus and train terminals Stockyards, not primarily for fattening or selling livestock Truck storage, overnight Trees and native vegetation: removal, relocation or damage` Within an overlay zone Uses and structures, accessory Dwelling, for superintendent or owner Dwelling, caretaker Game machines: three or fewer Recreational facilities, restaurants and cafes: for employees only Retail sale of products manufactured on -site Temporary buildings during construction' Vaccination clinics, temporary, for pet animals' Veterinary clinics, pet animals only' Warehousing and storage, including ministorage Automobile impound yards; dead storage of trucks, buses and the like Building materials, movers' equipment and the like: indoor Outdoor Fertilizer and manure Hazardous materials; including pesticides and herbicides Petroleum and gas (butane, propane, LPG, etc.); explosives and fireworks Recreational vehicles Storage of building materials, temporary' Waste treatment and disposal (see definitions) (Moorpark 1 -01) 318 C2 CO C1 CPD M1 M2 I C -OT 8 O O O • • O O SEE PRINCIPAL USE .I SEE CHAPTER 17.36 SEE PRINCIPAL USE O O O O O O O O • O O O O O • • O O O O O O • O • O O .I SEE CHAPTER 17.36 SEE PRINCIPAL USE O O O O O O :_: • Y O O • • :_: • Y l 7.20.060 Notes for Table 17.20.060: 1. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28. 2. If there is an existing planned development permit for the site, the school facility could be permitted by approval of a modification to the existing permit. 3. For M -1, M -2 and C -O zones, a school facility would only be permitted where sponsored by or permitted within an industrial or commercial use on the same site. 4. See also Section 17.20.040. 5. Churches located in existing buildings with an approved planned development permit will require a modification to that permit. 6. If existing industrial building has approved IPD. restaurant will require approved minor modification to IPD. 7. Restaurants with temporary outside eating facilities shall receive a modification to the planned development permit. 8. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations. 9. The establishment must be an otherwise permitted or conditionally permitted use in the zone. 10. Applicable only to those properties within the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone that have a base zoning of CO. 11. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.42, including an administrative permit requirement for pre - approved location on public property. (Ord. 278 § 5, 2002: Ord. 265 § 2 (part), 1999; Ord. 247 § 1(E), 1998: Ord. 234 § 2, 1997; Ord. 233 § 3, 1997; Ord. 209 § 3, 1995; Ord. 200 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -5), 1994) 318 -1 (Moorpark 6-02) C2 CO Cl CPD Mt M2 I C-OT Recycling facilities and centers O • O Water production, storage and distribution facilities: Private purveyors" O O O O Wholesale trade • • Wireless communications facilities" O O O O O O Zoological gardens, animal exhibits and commercial aquariums O O Notes for Table 17.20.060: 1. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.28. 2. If there is an existing planned development permit for the site, the school facility could be permitted by approval of a modification to the existing permit. 3. For M -1, M -2 and C -O zones, a school facility would only be permitted where sponsored by or permitted within an industrial or commercial use on the same site. 4. See also Section 17.20.040. 5. Churches located in existing buildings with an approved planned development permit will require a modification to that permit. 6. If existing industrial building has approved IPD. restaurant will require approved minor modification to IPD. 7. Restaurants with temporary outside eating facilities shall receive a modification to the planned development permit. 8. Most public water facilities are exempt from these regulations. 9. The establishment must be an otherwise permitted or conditionally permitted use in the zone. 10. Applicable only to those properties within the boundaries of the Downtown Specific Plan Overlay Zone that have a base zoning of CO. 11. There are specific regulations for this use; see Chapter 17.42, including an administrative permit requirement for pre - approved location on public property. (Ord. 278 § 5, 2002: Ord. 265 § 2 (part), 1999; Ord. 247 § 1(E), 1998: Ord. 234 § 2, 1997; Ord. 233 § 3, 1997; Ord. 209 § 3, 1995; Ord. 200 § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8105 -5), 1994) 318 -1 (Moorpark 6-02) 17.24.090 Speed Limit Sight Distance Chapter 17.28 On Major Street (mph) Required (ft.) 25 165 STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES 30 190 35 225 Sections: 40 260 17.28.010 Purpose. 45 300 17.28.020 Standards relating to dwellings. 50 350 17.28.030 Standards relating to animals. 55 400 17.28.040 Auto, boat and trailer sales lots. 17.28.050 Mobilehome parks. F. Light Fixtures. The following regulations apply to 17.28.060 Oil and gas exploration and light fixtures over two (2) feet in height: production. 1. Maximum height is twenty-four (24) feet (twelve 17.28.070 Produce stands. (12) feet if within one hundred (100) feet of residentially 17.28.080 Recreational vehicle parks. zoned property) unless a greater height is approved by the 17.28.090 Restaurants, bars and taverns. director of community development or his designee. 17.28.100 Mining and reclamation. 2. Such fixtures shall not be placed in side setbacks. 17.28.110 Veterinary clinics. 3. Lights in excess of one hundred (100) watts shall 17.28.120 Motion picture and TV not result in direct illumination of adjacent properties. production, temporary. 4. A lighting plan shall be submitted for all approved 17.28.130 Outdoor sales and services, entitlement projects governed by Chapter 17.44. The lighting temporary. plan shall achieve the following objectives: avoid interfer- 17.28.140 Christmas tree sales. ences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize 17.28.150 Temporary buildings during on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site lighting; construction. limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; 17.28.160 Storage of building materials, and provide structures which are compatible with the total temporary. design of the proposed facility. 17.28.170 Campgrounds. 5. Fixtures must provide sharp cut -off qualities which 17.28.180 Camps. minimize light spillage at property lines. 17.28.190 Retreats. 6. Energy-efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided 17.28.200 Golf courses. which are compatible with adjacent properties. 17.28.210 Buildings for the growing of 7. No direct light source (bulb) shall be visible from crops. the road. 17.28.220 Temporary pet vaccination 8. The architectural design of the pole(s) and lamp(s) clinics. shall complement the design of the building. 17.28.230 Day care facilities. 9. Eliminate upward light spillage. (Ord. 189 § 3 17.28.240 Nonmotorized wheeled (8106 -8), 1994) conveyance facilities and uses. 17.28.250 Caretaker recreational vehicle, - accessory. 17.28.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth standards and regulations which apply to proposed uses as listed. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -0), 1994) 17.28.020 Standards relating to dwellings. A. Antennas, Ground - Mounted. No antenna or mast shall exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height. The crank -up variety of ham radio antennas should be used. All units are encouraged to be color - coordinated to harmonize with predominant structural background material, so as to reduce visual impacts. Where feasible, support structures shall 326 CC ATTACHMENT 4 be screened from public view. The most unobtrusive locations for the antennas are generally in the rear yard, behind trees and adjacent to main or accessory buildings in order to provide background screening for the support structure. The height, nature, texture and color of all materials to be used for the installation, including landscape materials, shall be submitted with the permit application. B. Home Occupations. See Chapter 5.88. C. Mobilehomes and Manufactured Housing. 1. Mobilehome Construction. Mobilehomes may be used as single - family dwellings if the mobilehome was constructed on or after June 15, 1976. Mobilehomes used as second dwellings are subject to this date limitation. 2. Mobilehome Foundation System. Mobilehomes which are used as single - family residences or as caretaker or farm worker dwellings shall be installed on a foundation system in compliance with Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 1333 of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Nonconforming mobilehomes renewed under a continuation permit shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 2, Article 7 of Title 25. 3. Exterior Siding. Exterior siding of a single - family dwelling shall extend to the ground level, or to the top of the deck or structural platform where the dwelling is supported on an exposed pile foundation complying with the requirements of Sections 2908 and 2909 of the Uniform Building Code, or to the top of a perimeter foundation. For mobilehomes used as caretaker or farm worker dwell- ings, manufactured mobilehome skirting shall completely enclose the mobilehome, including the tongue, with a color and material that will be compatible with the mobilehome. The siding shall be covered with an exterior material customarily used on conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development. 4. Site Plan and Elevations. The site plans and eleva- tions of the proposed housing unit are subject to review and approval of the department of community development. Applicants are required to submit designs which are in keeping with the overall character and quality of the neigh- borhood and community. 5. Roof Pitch. The mobile home or manufactured housing unit shall have a roof with a pitch of not less than two (2) inches vertical rise for each twelve (12) inches of horizontal run and consisting of shingles or other material customarily used for conventional dwellings and approved by the department of community development and the building official. 6. Porches and Eaves. The mobile home or manufac- tured housing unit may be required to have porches and eaves, or roofs with eaves when, in the opinion of the department of community development, it is necessary to make it compatible with the dwellings in the area. 327 17.28.020 D. Mobilehome or Recreational Vehicle as Temporary Dwelling During Construction. A mobilehome or recre- ational vehicle may be used by the owner (s) of a lot as a temporary dwelling unit for twelve (12) months during construction of a residence for which a building permit is in full force and effect on the same site. The director of community development may grant one (1) additional twelve (12) month period and a time extension if substantial progress toward construction of the principal residence is being made. Said mobilehome or recreational vehicle shall be connected to the permanent water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the Ventura County environmental health division for the structure under construction. Within forty-five (45) days after a clearance for occupancy is issued by the city division of building and safety, any such recreational vehicle shall be disconnected from such systems and cease being used as a dwelling, and any such mobilehome shall be removed from the site. A temporary mobilehome or recreational vehicle may be accessory to construction on adjacent lots under the same ownership as the lot on which the mobilehome or recreational vehicle is installed. A bond or cash deposit shall be required in the amount to cover removal of the temporary mobilehome prior to receiving city approval for the placement of the temporary dwelling. The amount of the deposit shall be determined by the director of community development. E. Model Homes/Lot Sales. Model homes, or a tempo- rary office, for the limited purpose of conducting sale only of lots or dwellings in the subdivision, or dwellings of similar design in another subdivision in the vicinity may be permitted, subject to the following provisions: 1. The model homes or lots sales are part of an ap- proved tentative map. 2. Road plans shall be submitted to the public works department for approval. F. Open Storage. 1. There shall be no open storage in any front or street - side setback, or in an area three (3) feet wide along one (1) side lot line. 2. On lots of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet or smaller, open storage shall not exceed an aggregate area of two hundred (200) square feet. On lots greater in area than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, the aggregate area shall not exceed one percent (1 %) of the total lot area, up to a maximum of one thousand (1,000) square feet. Lots of forty (40) acres or more in the O-S and A -E zones are permitted a maximum of two thousand (2,000) square feet of open storage, provided that all open storage exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet is screened from view from all public rights -of -way within three hundred (300) feet of such additional storage area. 17.28.020 3. With the exception of boats and unstacked automo- tive vehicles, the materials shall be limited to a height of six (6) feet. 4. Open storage must be accessory to the principal use of the property, and not related to any off -site commer- cial business or activity. 5. The following are not considered to fall within the definition of open storage, and are therefore exempt from the above open storage regulations: a. Materials or equipment kept on any lot for use in construction of any building or room addition on said lot for which a zoning clearance and necessary building permits are obtained and in force, provided that such storage is neat and orderly, and does not exceed an area equal to the gross floor area of the building or addition under construc- tion. Stored materials shall be installed within one hundred eighty (180) days of their placement on the lot; however, the director of community development may grant a time extension for good cause, based on a written request from the applicant; b. Items used periodically or continuously on the property by the resident(s) thereof, such as outdoor furniture, trash cans or barrels, equipment for maintenance of the property, outdoor cooking equipment, and recreational equipment, accessory to the principal use; c. Operative vehicles, boats, vehicles, or other items placed on trailers which are operative and licensed for travel on public thoroughfares; d. One cord (128 cubic feet) of firewood, if stored in a neat and orderly manner in one (1) location on the lot. G. Second Dwelling. 1. Standards and Requirements. A second dwelling, as defined in Section 17.08.010, requires approval of an administrative permit, and compliance with all of the following standards and requirements: a. A second dwelling shalt only be permitted on a residential zoned lot that is one - fourth acre (ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet) or larger in size. b. The lot on which a second dwelling is to be con- structed shall contain an existing single - family dwelling, which is owner occupied at the time of application for a zoning clearance and building permit for the second dwell- ing. c. Prior to the approval of a zoning clearance for a second dwelling, the applicant shall be required to complete a neighborhood notification process, as established by city council resolution. d. The maximum size of the second dwelling shall be limited to the more restrictive of either thirty percent (30%) of the existing single - family dwelling floor space or the following lot size limitations: 328 i. Lots ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet to twenty-one thousand seven hundred eighty (21,780) square feet — a second dwelling shall not exceed eight hundred (800) square feet. ii. Lots twenty-one thousand seven hundred eighty-one (21,781) square feet to forty -three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet — a second dwelling shall not exceed nine hundred (900) square feet. iii. Lots greater than one (1) acre to five (5) acres (two hundred seventeen thousand eight hundred (217,800) square feet) — a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. iv. Lots greater than five (5) acres —a second dwelling shall not exceed one thousand one hundred (1,100) square feet. e. No more than one (1) second dwelling is allowed on each lot. f . The second dwelling shall not be sold as a separate unit, but it may be rented. g. The lot must conform with the lot area, width and depth requirements for the underlying zone. A second dwelling shall not be allowed on a legal nonconforming lot. h. Establishment of a second dwelling shall not create or increase a nonconforming use or structure. A second dwelling shall not be allowed on a lot which contains a legal nonconforming use or structure. L Minimum yard setbacks from the property lines for the second dwelling and associated garage or carport structure shall be the same as is required for the existing single - family dwelling based on the more restrictive of either: (i) the setback requirements of an approved residen- tial planned development (RPD) permit (see Section 17.36.030(8)(3)); or (ii) the setback requirements of the applicable zone district (see Section 17.24.020). j. Architectural standards of the second dwelling shall conform to the existing single - family dwelling through use of the appropriate building form, height, materials and color. The roof material used for the second dwelling shall be equal to or of higher quality than that used for the existing single - family dwelling. k. The only accessory structures that may be attached to, or share a common wall with, a detached second dwell- ing are a garage or carport. 1. The following parking standards shall apply: i. The number of parking spaces required shall be as follows: (A) Second dwelling eight hundred (800) to nine hundred (900) square feet in size — one (1) covered or uncovered parking space is required. (B) Second dwelling larger than nine hundred (900) square feet in size — two (2) covered or uncovered parking spaces are required. (ii) The size of each required off - street parking space shall be an unobstructed minimum of nine (9) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long. (iii) The parking space(s) provided for the second dwell- ing shall not be located in a required dwelling unit setback and shall be paved. (iv) The requited off -street parking space(s) for a second dwelling shall be in addition to the parking required for the existing single - family dwelling, and shall be located on the same lot as the existing single - family and second dwellings. (v) Access to the parking area for a second dwelling shall be at least ten (10) feet wide and paved. m. The director of community development may approve the use of a mobilehome or a manufactured house on a fixed foundation as a second dwelling, if the design is compatible with the existing single - family dwelling and the surrounding community, and all of the mobilehome and manufactured housing standards of subsection C of this section are complied with. n. A second dwelling processing fee, as established by city council resolution, shall be paid at the time of application for a zoning clearance for a second dwelling. 2. Deferral of Decision on Application. The director of community development may defer any approval or denial decision on an application for a zoning clearance for a second dwelling to the planning commission if the proposal: a. Involves significant public controversy; or b. Is in conflict with the standards and requirements of subsection (G)(1) of this section; c. May be precedent setting; or d. Should be deferred for any other cause deemed justifiable by the director of community development. H. Use of Structures for Dwelling Purposes. Structures may not be used for human habitation except as specifically permitted in this title. I. Satellite Dish Antennas. The intent and purpose of this section is to regulate the installation of satellite dish antennas through the design review building process to protect the environment, the character of the neighborhoods or of the city as a whole, and the health, safety and general welfare of the public. 1. Permitted Uses. a. Satellite dish antennas shall be permitted uses upon approval of the director of community development in the residential zones in the case where the antenna is ground mounted and the entire apparatus does not exceed eight (8) feet from the ground, when the antenna is to be located 329 17.28.020 in the side or rear yard and conforms to the side or rear yard residential setbacks for accessory buildings, when the antenna is not visible from the public right -of -way, and when the antenna is provided with a screening cover. b. Satellite antennas located in any commercial, indus- trial, public facility, or any multifamily zone, will be required to receive approval from the department of com- munity development. The department of community devel- opment may issue a denial if the proposed location infiinges on the adjacent property owner or does not meet certain conditions to maintain aesthetics in the area. Such applica- tion shall be filed with the department of community development and shall include a plan showing the location of the proposed antenna, height and width of antenna, setback distances and description of the type of mount to be used, and the landscape plans showing location of existing trees, other natural features and proposed landscap- ing features, including fence, wall or other screening, and an application fee set by city council resolution. 2. General Provisions. a. Only one (1) satellite dish will be allowed for a single - family residential lot or apartment project. b. The support structures for satellite dish antennas in all zones, except for single- family residential zones where the antenna is to be located in a side or rear yard, shall be screened from view from public right -of -way, by use of walls, fences and/or landscaping. c. No advertising or text shall be permitted on the satellite dish antenna, except for operational safety or minimal logo information. d. All satellite dish antennas, including the construc- tion and installation thereof, shall conform to the Uniform Building Code and Electrical Code requirements. e. When attached to a main structure, the satellite dish antenna shall not exceed the maximum building height in the respective zone. f. The satellite dish antenna shall not encroach into any required setback except the rear residential setback, nor shall it be in any required open space, private recreation area or required parking space. g. Outdoor wires necessary for the operation of the antenna shall be placed underground or attached flush against the building surface. h. All units are encouraged to be color - coordinated to harmonize with predominant structural background material, so as to reduce visual impacts. i. Satellite dish antennas outside of residential zones may be located on rooftops with approval of the director of community development only if ground mounting is inappropriate or inaccessible. If allowed, roof - mounted antennas shall be screened with such screening designed *� ,r♦ T F^ 17.28.020 as an integral part of the building, to have the same color of the building. j. The city council shall adopt by resolution a process providing for notification of homeowner associations and adjacent neighbors prior to action by the decision - making authority. (Ord. 1% § 3 (part), 1994; Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -1), 1994) 17.28.030 Standards relating to animals. A. Purpose. These regulations are intended to establish standards and conditions for the keeping of all animals in the city while protecting the health, safety and welfare of its residents. B. General Provisions— Standards. All the standards contained in this section shall apply equally to all properties unless otherwise noted. 1. Enclosure. All animals shall be properly caged or housed, and must be kept in their corrals, barns, pens or other enclosure. All corrals, pens, coops, lofts, exercise areas, or other similar structures shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed to adequately confine the animal(s). 2. Maintenance. All buildings housing farm animals, all animal enclosures and all pasture areas shall be main- tained free from litter, garbage and the accumulation of manure. Premises shall be maintained in a neat and sanitary manner. If farm animals are not maintained in compliance with these standards, or are otherwise allowed to become a nuisance, the city shall initiate enforcement proceedings as provided by this code. 3. Animals Not Classified Any animal not specifically classified within this chapter shall be classified by the director of community development, based upon a determi- nation as to the probable negative impact of the health, safety or general welfare upon the community. C. Pet Animals. The keeping of pet animals is permitted in all zones of the city, subject to the following provisions: 1. Dogs, Cats, Pot - Bellied Pigs and Miniature Horses. a. Dogs, cats. pot -bellied pigs and miniature horses are permitted to be kept upon lots used primarily for resi- dential or agricultural uses, for recreational purposes (and as protection) as provided in subsection (11)(1)(b) of this section. They are permitted to be kept as an accessory use upon any lot developed with an office, business or other commercial or industrial use for the primary purpose of protecting the premises from varmints and trespassers. b. Multifamily dwellings in the city may have up to two (2) dogs, cats, pot - bellied pigs or miniature horses (in any combination). All other dwellings in the city may have up to four (4) dogs, four (4) cats, four (4) pigs, or four (4) miniature horses, or any combination not to exceed a total of four (4) such animals. 330 c. The offspring of animals are allowed and shall not be counted towards the maximum allowed number until they are of weanable or self- sufficient age. Dogs and cats, pot - bellied pigs and miniature horses shall be counted as weaned at four (4) months of age or more. 2. Other Allowed Household Animals. a. A maximum of fifteen (15) other domestic animals such as domestic mice and rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, chelonians, tropical fish, birds of the psittacine family (enclosure must be set back at least fifteen (15) feet from any dwelling or adjacent property). b. Small caged crustaceans, amphibians and arthropods, and other similar animals commonly sold in pet stores and kept as household pets, may be kept upon any lot in any zone where the principal use upon any such lot is residen- tial, so long as animals are not maintained for commercial purposes, do not constitute a nuisance, are adequately provided with food, care and sanitary facilities, and do not exceed a total of six (6) animals (fish being exempt) on any lot either within or outside any dwelling. Offspring shall not be counted until four (4) months from birth. c. Animals that, because of size, specialized breeding or other unique quality, cannot be clearly categorized may be permitted (including total number) , upon approval of the director of community development. 3. Animal Units. The keeping of faun animals as a principal or accessory use, except for pet animals, shall be permitted in accordance with the matrix and table of animal unit equivalents set forth below: 17.28.030 Notes: 1. In calculations for permitted animals, fractional numbers are to be rounded to the lower whole number. 2. The offspring of animals are allowed and shall not be counted until they are of weanable or self - sufficient age. 3. These separation requirements do not apply to pet animals (see subsection C of this section). 4. No cows, bulls, horses, mules or donkeys on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in the R -A or R -E zone; see subsection E of this section for exception. ANIMAL UNIT EQUIVALENTS The following table indicates the animal unit equivalents for each type of permitted animal and provides for different types of animals to be combined on a given lot. The table is to be interpreted as follows: a cow is one (1) animal unit, a chicken • is one -tenth ('/►o) of an animal unit, and so on. To calculate the number of any one (1) type of animal allowed on a property, divide the total number of animal units allowed on the property by the animal unit equivalent for that animal. Animal Type Bull Chicken Cow Donkey Duck Game hen Racing pigeon Goat, female Goat, male Goose Guinea fowl Animal Unit Equivalent 1.0 .1 1.0 1.0 .1 .1 .05 .33 .5 .16 .5 Animal Type Horse Pony Mule Peafowl Pig Rabbit or other fur- bearing animal of similar size at maturity Sheep Turkey Animal Unit Equivalent 1.0 .5 1.0 .5 .5 .05 .16 No roosters, peafowl or guinea fowl are permitted in the R -1 zone or on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in area in other zones. 331 Minimum Lot Distance Separation Zone Area Required Animal Units Permitted'2 Requirements' O -S 10,000 sq. ft. Lots less than 20,000 sq. ft.: two units°. Lots Except for movement on and A -E of 20,000 sq. ft. to 10 acres: 1 unit per 10,000 off the property, animals shall R -A sq. ft. of lot area. Lots over 10 acres: no limit. not be kept, maintained or used in any way, inside or outside of R -O 20,000 sq. ft. Horses/ponies: 3 units plus 1 unit per 30,000 sq. ft. of total lot area. Other animals: 1 unit any structure, within 40 feet of per 10,000 sq. ft. of total lot area. those portions of any structure used for human occupancy, as- sembly or habitation, other than R-E 10,000 sq. ft. 2 units plus 1 unit per 20,000 sq. ft. of total lot area.` the residence of the owner or keeper of such animals. R -1 20,000 sq. ft. 1 unit per 10,000 sq. ft. of lot area. Notes: 1. In calculations for permitted animals, fractional numbers are to be rounded to the lower whole number. 2. The offspring of animals are allowed and shall not be counted until they are of weanable or self - sufficient age. 3. These separation requirements do not apply to pet animals (see subsection C of this section). 4. No cows, bulls, horses, mules or donkeys on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in the R -A or R -E zone; see subsection E of this section for exception. ANIMAL UNIT EQUIVALENTS The following table indicates the animal unit equivalents for each type of permitted animal and provides for different types of animals to be combined on a given lot. The table is to be interpreted as follows: a cow is one (1) animal unit, a chicken • is one -tenth ('/►o) of an animal unit, and so on. To calculate the number of any one (1) type of animal allowed on a property, divide the total number of animal units allowed on the property by the animal unit equivalent for that animal. Animal Type Bull Chicken Cow Donkey Duck Game hen Racing pigeon Goat, female Goat, male Goose Guinea fowl Animal Unit Equivalent 1.0 .1 1.0 1.0 .1 .1 .05 .33 .5 .16 .5 Animal Type Horse Pony Mule Peafowl Pig Rabbit or other fur- bearing animal of similar size at maturity Sheep Turkey Animal Unit Equivalent 1.0 .5 1.0 .5 .5 .05 .16 No roosters, peafowl or guinea fowl are permitted in the R -1 zone or on lots less than twenty thousand (20,000) sq. ft. in area in other zones. 331 17.28.030 D. Applicability of Lot Area Requirements. Abutting lots under unified control, either through ownership or by means of a lease, may be combined in order to meet minimum area requirements for animal- keeping or to keep a greater number of animals, but only for the duration of such common ownership or lease, and only in zones which allow the keeping of animals as a principal use. E. Temporary Exception. In the R -E zone, the director of community development may authorize the keeping of a maximum of two (2) horses on lots of ten thousand (10,000) to twenty thousand (20,000) square feet, and an exception to the distance separation requirements for a period of one (1) year, without holding a public hearing, provided that the applicant submits: 1. A completed application form, as provided by the director of community development; 2. A county assessor map, in duplicate, showing the applicant's property outlined in red, the area and structures to be devoted to animal use and the assessor parcel numbers of all contiguous properties; and 3. A letter of consent from each resident located within one hundred (100) feet of where the horses are to be kept, maintained or used in any other way. The letter shall contain the assessor parcel number, address and telephone number of the contiguous resident, and shall state that the contiguous resident is agreeable to the requested keeping of horses and to the requested reduction of the distance separation requirements. F. Apiculture. 1. Street Separation. No beehive or box shall be located or maintained within one hundred fifty (150) feet of any public road, street or highway, or as determined by the director of community development. 2. Apiary Location. A beehive or box shall be located or maintained a safe distance from an urbanized area. For the purpose of this section, an urbanized area is defined as an area containing three (3) or more dwelling units per acre. As the size of the area increases, the number of dwelling units must increase proporticfnately by a minimum of (3) three dwelling units per acre. A "reasonable distance" shall be determined after investigation by the director of community development. Decisions of the director of community development may be appealed pursuant to Section 17.44.090. 3. Dwelling Separation. No beehive or box shall be located or maintained within four hundred (400) feet of any dwelling on adjacent property. 4. Property Line Separation. No apiary shall be located or maintained within fifty (50) feet of any property line common to other property except that it may be adjoining the property line when such other property contains an 332 apiary, or upon mutual agreement for such location with the adjoining property owner. 5. Water. Available adequate and suitable water supply shall be maintained on the property near the apiaries at all times. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -2), 1994) 17.28.040 Auto, boat and trailer sales lots. New and used automobile, trailer and boat sales yards are subject to the following conditions: A. No repair or reconditioning of automobiles, trailers or boats shall be permitted unless such work is accessory to the principal retail use and is done entirely within an enclosed building. B. Except for required landscaping, the entire open area of the premises shall be surfaced with concrete or asphaltic concrete. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -3), 1994) 17.28.050 Mobilehome parks. A. Mobilehome parks shall be developed in accordance with all applicable standards, including density standards (number of dwellings per unit of lot area), of the zone in which the mobilehome park is located. B. A mobilehome park may include, as part of an approved permit, recreational and clubhouse facilities and other accessory uses. C. The minimum distance between structures in a mobilehome park shall be ten feet, except that the minimum distance between accessory structures shall be six (6) feet. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -4), 1994) 17.28.060 Oil and gas exploration and production. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish reasonable and uniform limitations, safeguards and controls for oil and gas exploration and production facilities and operations within the city which will allow for the reason- able use of an important city resource. These regulations shall also ensure that development activities will be conduct- ed in harmony with other uses of land within the city and that the rights of surface and mineral owners are balanced. B. Application. Unless otherwise indicated herein, the purposes and provisions of Section 17.28.060 et seq. shall be and are automatically imposed on and made a part of any permit for oil or gas exploration and development issued by city on or after March 24, 1983. Such provisions shall be imposed in the form of permit conditions when permits are issued for new development or for existing wells/ facilities without permits, or when existing permits are modified. These conditions may be modified at the discre- tion of the director of community development, pursuant to Section 17.44.060B. Furthermore, said provisions shall apply to any oil and gas exploration and development operation initiated on or after March 24, 1983, upon federally owned lands for which no land use permit is required by the city. No permit is required by the city for oil and gas exploration and production operations conducted on federally owned lands pursuant to the provisions of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of I920 (30 U.S.C. Section 181 et seq.). C. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined herein, or unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the definition of petroleum- related terms shall be that used by the State Division of Oil and Gas. D. Required Permits. No oil or gas exploration or production - related use may commence without or inconsis- tent with a conditional use permit approved pursuant to this title. Furthermore, a zoning clearance must be obtained by the permittee to confirm consistency with the zoning ordinance and/or conditional use permit prior to drilling every well, commencing site preparation for such well(s), or installing related appurtenances, as defined by the director of community development. However, a single zoning clearance may be issued for more than one (1) well or drill site or structure. Possession of an approved conditional use permit shall not relieve the operator of the responsibility of securing and complying with any other permit which may be required by other city ordinances, or state or federal laws. No condition of a conditional use permit for uses allowed by this title shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. When more than one (1) set of rules applies, the stricter one shall take precedence. E. Oil Development Guidelines. The general guidelines that follow shall be used in the development of conditions which will help ensure that oil development projects gener- ate minimal negative impacts on the environment. The guidelines shall be applied whenever physically and economically feasible and practicable, unless the strict application of a particular guideline(s) would otherwise defeat the intent of other guidelines. An applicant should use the guidelines in the design of the project and anticipate their use as permit conditions, unless the applicant can demonstrate that they are not feasible or practicable. 1. Permit areas and drill sites should generally coincide and should only be as large as necessary to accommodate typical drilling and production equipment. 2. The number of drill sites in an area should be minimized by using centralized drill sites, directional drilling and other techniques. 3. Drill sites and production facilities should be located so that they are not readily seen. 333 17.28.060 4. Permittee and operators should share facilities such as, but not limited to, permit areas, drill sites, access roads, storage production and processing facilities and pipelines. 5. The following guidelines shall apply to the installa- tion and use of oil and gas pipelines: a. Pipelines should be used to transport petroleum products off -site to promote traffic safety and air quality. b. The use of a pipeline for transporting crude oil may be a condition of approval for expansion of existing process- ing facilities or construction of new processing facilities. c. New pipeline corridors should be consolidated with existing pipeline or electrical transmission corridors where feasible, unless there are overriding technical constraints or significant social, aesthetic, environmental or economic reasons not to do so. d. When feasible, pipelines shall be routed to avoid important resource areas, such as recreation, sensitive habitat, geological hazard and archaeological areas. Un- avoidable routing through such areas shall be done in a manner that minimizes the impacts of potential spills by considering spill volumes, durations and projected paths. New pipeline segments shall be equipped with automatic shutoff valves, or suitable alternatives approved by the director of community development, so that each segment will be isolated in the event of a break. e. Upon completion of pipeline construction, the site shall be restored to the approximate previous grade and condition. All sites previously covered with native vegeta- tion shall be reseeded with the same or recovered with the previously removed vegetative materials, and shall include other measures as deemed necessary to prevent erosion until the vegetation can become established, and to promote visual and environmental quality. 6. Cuts or fills associated with access roads and drill sites should be kept to a minimum to avoid erosion and visual impacts. They should be located in inconspicuous areas, and generally not exceed ten (10) vertical feet. Cuts or fills should be restored to their original grade once the use has been discontinued. 7. Gas from wells should be piped to centralized collection and processing facilities, rather than being flared, to preserve energy resources and air quality, and to reduce fire hazards and light sources. Oil should also be piped to centralized collection and processing facilities, in order to minimize land use conflicts and environmental degrada- tion, and to promote visual quality. 8. Wells should be located a minimum of eight hundred (800) feet from occupied sensitive uses. Private access roads to drill sites should be located a minimum of three hundred (300) feet from occupied sensitive uses, unless this requirement is waived by the occupant. 17.28.060 9. Oversized vehicles should be preceded by lead vehicles, where necessary for traffic safety. 10. Lighting should be kept to a minimum to approxi- mate normal nighttime light levels. 11. In the design of new or modified oil and gas produc- tion facilities, best accepted practices in drilling and produc- tion methods should be utilized, if capable of reducing factors of nuisance and annoyance. F. Oil Development Standards. The following are minimum standards and requirements which shall be applied pursuant to subsection B of this section. More restrictive requirements may be imposed on a project through the conditions of the permit. Measurements are taken from the outside perimeter of the noise receptors noted below: 1. Setbacks. No well shall be drilled and no equipment or facilities shall be located within: a. On-C hundred (100) feet of any dedicated public street, highway or nearest rail of a railway being used as such, unless the new well is located on an existing drill site and the new well would not present a safety or right -of -- way problem. If aesthetics is a problem, then the permit must be conditioned to mitigate the problem; b. Five hundred (500) feet of any building or dwelling not necessary to the operation of the well, unless a waiver is signed pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section, allowing the setback to be reduced. In no case shall the well be located less than one hundred (100) feet from said structures; c. Five hundred (500) feet of any institution, school or other building used as a place of public assemblage, unless a waiver is signed pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section, allowing the setback to be reduced. In no case shall any well be located less than three hundred (300) feet from said structures; d. Three hundred (300) feet from the edge of the existing banks of "red line" channels as established by the Ventura County flood control district (VCFCD), one hun- dred (100) feet from the existing banks of all other channels appearing on the most current United States Geological Survey (USGS) two thousand (2,000) feet scale topographic map as a blue line. These setbacks shall prevail unless the permittee can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the public works agency that the subject use can be safely located nearer the stream or channel in question without posing an undue risk of water pollution, and impairment of flood control interests. In no case shall setbacks from streams or channels be less than fifty (50) feet. All drill sites located within the one hundred year floodplain shall be protected from flooding in accordance with flood control district - requirements; e. The applicable setbacks for accessory structures for the zone in which the use is located; 334 f. One hundred (100) feet from any marsh, small wash, intermittent lake, intermittent stream, spring or perennial stream appearing on the most current USGS two thousand (2,000) feet scale topographic map, unless a qualified biologist, approved by the city, determines that there are no significant biological resources present or that this standard setback should be adjusted. 2. Obstruction of Drainage Courses. Drill sites and access roads shall not obstruct natural drainage courses. Diverting or channeling such drainage courses may be permitted only with the authorization of the public works agency. 3. Removal of Equipment. All equipment used for drilling, redrilling, and maintenance work on approved wells shall be removed from the site within thirty (30) days of the completion of such work unless a time extension is approved by the director of community development. 4. Containment of Contaminants. Oil, produced water, drilling fluids, cuttings and other contaminants associated with the drilling, production, storage and transport of oil shall be contained on the site unless properly transported off -site, injected into a well, treated or re-used in an ap- proved manner on -site or if allowed, off -site. Appropriate permits, permit modifications or approvals must be secured when necessary, prior to treatment or re-use of oil field waste materials. The permittee shall furnish the director of community development with a plan for controlling oil spillage and preventing saline or other polluting or contami- nating substances from reaching surface or subsurface waters. The plan shall be consistent with requirements of city, state and federal laws. 5. Securities. Prior to the commencement or continu- ance of drilling or other uses on an existing permit, the permittee shall file, in a form acceptable to the city attorney and certified by the city clerk, a bond or other security in the penal amount of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for each well that is drilled or to be drilled. Any operator may, in lieu of filing such a security for each well drilled, redrilled, produced or maintained, file a security in the penal amount of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) to cover all operations conducted in the city of Moorpark, a political subdivision of the state of Califor- nia, conditioned upon the permittee well and truly obeying, fulfilling and performing each and every term and provision in the permit. In case of any failure by the permittee to perform or comply with any term or provision thereof, the planning commission may, after notice to the permittee and a public hearing, by resolution, determine the amount of the penalty and declare all or part of the security forfeited in accordance with its provisions. The sureties and principal will be jointly and severally obligated to pay forthwith the full amount of the forfeiture to the city. The forfeiture of any security shall not insulate the permittee from liability in excess of the sum of the security for damages or injury, or expense or liability suffered by the city from any breach by permittee of any term or condition of said permit or of any applicable ordinance or of this security. No security shall be exonerated until after all the applicable conditions of the permit have been met. 6. Dust Prevention. The drill site and all roads or hauling routes located between the public right -0f - -way and the subject site shall be improved or otherwise treated as required by the city and maintained as necessary to prevent the emanation of dust. Access roads shall be designed and maintained so as to minimize erosion, prevent the deteriora- tion of vegetation and crops, and ensure adequate levels of safety. 7. Light Emanation. light emanation shall be controlled so as not to produce excessive levels of glare or abnormal light levels directed at any neighboring uses. Lighting shall be kept to a minimum to maintain the normal nighttime fight levels in the area, but not inhibit adequate and safe working light levels. The location of all flood lights and an outline of the illuminated area shall be shown on the landscape plan, if required, or on the requisite plot plan. 8. Reporting of Accidents. The permittee shall immedi- ately notify the director of community development and fire department and all other applicable agencies in the event of fires, spills or hazardous conditions not incidental to the normal operations at the permit site. Upon request of any city agency, the permittee shall provide a written report of any incident within seven (7) calendar days which shall include, but not be limited to, a description of the facts of the incident, the corrective measures used and the steps taken to prevent recurrence of the incident. Note: The provisions in Proposition 65 apply. 9. Painting. All permanent facilities, structures, and aboveground pipelines on the site shall be colored so as to mask the facilities from the surrounding environment and uses in the area. Said colors shall also take into account such additional factors as heat buildup and designation of danger areas. Said colors shall be approved by the director of community development prior to painting of facilities. Time Period Day (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) Evening (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) Night (10 :00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) 17.28.060 10. Site Maintenance. The permit area shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner so as not to create any hazardous or unsightly conditions such as debris; pools of oil, water, or other liquids; weeds; brush; and trash. Equipment and materials may be stored on the site which are appurtenant to the operation and maintenance of the oil well located thereon. If the well has been suspended, idled or shut -in for thirty (30) days, as determined by the Division of Oil and Gas, all such equipment and materials shall be removed within ninety (90) days. 11. Site Restoration. Within ninety (90) days of revoca- tion, expiration or surrender of any permit, or abandonment of the use, the permittee shall restore and revegetate the premises to as nearly its original condition as is practicable, unless otherwise requested by the landowner. 12. Insurance. The permittee shall maintain, for the life of the permit, liability insurance of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) for one (1) person and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all persons and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) for property damage. This requirement does not preclude the permittee from being self - insured. 13. Noise Standard. a. Unless herein exempted, drilling, production and maintenance operations associated with an approved oil permit shall not produce noise, measured at a point outside of occupied sensitive uses such as residences, schools, health care facilities, or places of public assembly, that exceeds the following standard or any other more restrictive standard that may be established as a condition of a specific permit. Noise from the subject property shall be considered in excess of the standard when the average sound level, measured over one (1) hour, is greater than the standard that follows. The determination of whether a violation has occurred shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the permit in question. b. Nomenclature and noise level description definitions are in accordance with the city general plan goals, policies and programs and the city general plan hazards appendix. Measurement procedures shall be in accordance with the city general plan hazards appendix. c. The maximum allowable average sound level is as follows: Average Noise Levels (LEQ) Drilling and Maintenance Phase 55 dB(A) 50 dB(A) 45 dB(A) 335 Producing Phase 45 dB(A) 40 dB(A) 40 dB(A) 17.28.060 For purposes of this section, a well is in the "producing phase" when hydrocarbons are being extracted or when the well is idled and not undergoing maintenance. It is presumed that a well is in the "drilling and maintenance phase" when not in the "producing phase." 14. Exceptions to Noise Standard. The noise standard established pursuant to subsection (F)(13) of this section shall not be exceeded unless covered under any of the following provisions: a. Where the ambient noise levels (excluding the subject facility) exceed the applicable noise standards. In such cases, the maximum allowable noise levels shall not exceed the ambient noise levels plus three (3) dB(A). b. Where the owners/occupants of sensitive uses have signed a waiver pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section indicating that they are aware that drilling and production operations could exceed the allowable noise standard and that they are willing to experience such noise levels. The applicable noise levels shall apply at all locations where the owners/occupants did not sign such a waiver. 15. Compliance with Noise Standard. When a permittee has been notified by the planning division that his operation is in violation of the applicable noise standard, the permittee shall correct the problem as soon as possible in coordination with the department of community development. In the interim, operations may continue; however, the operator shall attempt to minimize the total noise generated at the site by limiting, whenever possible, such activities as the following: a. Hammering on pipe; b. Racking or making -up of pipe; c. Acceleration and deceleration of engines or motors; d. Drilling assembly rotational speeds that cause more noise than necessary and could reasonably be reduced by use of a slower rotational speed; e. Picking up or laying down drill pipe, casing, tubing or rods into or out of the drill hole. If the noise problem has not been corrected by seven (7:00) p.m. of the following day, the offending operations, except for those deemed necessary for safety reasons by the director of community development upon the advice of the Division of Oil and Gas, shall be suspended until the problem is corrected. 16. Preventive Noise Insulation. If drilling, redrilling or maintenance operations, such as pulling pipe or pumps, are located within one thousand six hundred (1,600) feet of an occupied sensitive use, the work platform, engine base and draw works, crown block, power sources, pipe rack and other probable noise sources associated with a drilling or maintenance operation shall all be enclosed with soundproofing sufficient to ensure that expected noise levels do not exceed the noise limits applicable to the permit. 336 Such soundproofing shall be installed prior to the com- mencement of drilling or maintenance activities, and shall include any or all of the following: acoustical blanket coverings, soundwalls, or other soundproofing materials or methods which ensure that operations meet the applicable noise standard. 17. Waiver of Preventive Noise Insulation. The applicant may have a noise study prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant, approved by the city. If the findings of the study conclude that the proposed project will meet the city noise standards contained in subsection (Fx13) of this section and do not constitute a nuisance, then the soundproofing requirement may be waived. If the findings show that a noise level will be generated above and beyond the city standards, then soundproofing must be installed sufficient to meet the applicable noise standard. Where a waiver pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section is signed, no preventive noise insulation will be required. 18. Soundproofing Material. All acoustical blankets or panels used for required soundproofing shall be of fireproof materials and shall comply with California Indus- trial Safety Standards and shall be approved by the Ventura County fire protection district prior to installation. 19. Hours of Well Maintenance. All nonemergency maintenance of a well, such as the pulling of pipe and replacement of pumps, shall be limited to the hours of seven (7:00) a.m. to seven (7:00) p.m. of the same day if the well site is located within three thousand (3,000) feet of an occupied residence. This requirement may be waived by the director of community development if the permittee can demonstrate that the applicable noise standard can be met or that all applicable parties within the prescribed distance have signed a waiver pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section. 20. Limited Drilling Hours. All drilling activities shall be limited to the hours of seven (7:00) a.m. through seven (7:00) p.m. of the same day when they occur less than eight hundred (800) feet from an occupied sensitive use. Night- time drilling shall be permitted if it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the director of community development that the applicable noise standard can be met or that all applicable parties within the prescribed distance have signed a waiver pursuant to subsection (F)(25) of this section. 21. Signs. In addition to the signage otherwise allowed by Chapter 17.40, only signs required for directions, instruc- tions and warnings, identification of wells and facilities, or signs required by other city ordinances or state and federal laws may be placed in areas subject to an oil and gas conditional use permit. Identification signs shall be a maximum four (4) square feet in size and shall contain, at minimum, the following information: a. Division of Oil and Gas well name and number; b. Name of owner /operator; c. Name of lease and name and/or number of the well; d. Name and telephone number of person(s) on twenty- four (24) hour emergency call. The well identification sign(s) shall be maintained at the well site from the time drilling operations commence until the well is abandoned. 22. Fencing. All active well sites (except submersible pumps), sumps and/or drainage basins or any machinery in use or intended to be used at the well site or other associated facilities shall be securely fenced, if required, based on the director of community development's deter- mination that fencing is necessary due to the proximity of nearby businesses, residences, or other occupied sensitive uses. A single, adequate fence which is compatible with surrounding area, may be used to enclose more than one (1) oil well or well site and appurtenances. Location of fences shall be shown on a submitted plot plan and/or landscape plan, if required. Fences must meet all Division of Oil and Gas regulations. 23. General Standards. Projects shall be located, designed and operated so as to minimize their adverse impact on the physical and social environment. To this end, dust, noise, vibration, noxious odors, intrusive light, aesthetic impacts and other factors of nuisance and annoyance shall be reduced to a minimum or eliminated through the best accepted practices incident to the exploration and production of oil and gas. 24. Screening and Landscaping. All oil and gas produc- tion areas shall be landscaped so as to screen production equipment in a manner consistent with the natural character of the area, if required, based on the director of community development's determination that landscaping is necessary. Required landscaping shall be implemented in accordance with a landscape and irrigation plan to be approved by the director of community development or his/her designee after consultation with the property owner. The landscape plan shall be consistent with the city guide to landscape plans and shall include measures for adequate screening of producing wells and permanent equipment from view of public roads or residential uses, revegetation of all cut and fill banks, and the restoration of disturbed areas of the site not directly related to oil and gas production. Low water usage landscaping and use of native plants shall be encouraged. 25. Waivers. Where provisions exist for the waiver of an ordinance requirement, the waiver must be signed by the owner and all adult occupants of a dwelling, or in the case of other sensitive uses, by the owner of the use in question. Once a waiver is granted, the permittee is exempt from affected ordinance requirements for the life of the waiver. Unless otherwise stated by the signatory, a waiver 337 17.28.060 signed pursuant to subsection (F)(14)(b) of this section shall also be considered a waiver applicable to subsections (F)(16). (17), (19) and (20) of this section. 26. Application of Sensitive Use Related Standards. The imposition of regulations on petroleum operations, which are based on distances from occupied sensitive uses, shall only apply to those occupied sensitive uses which were in existence at the time the permit for the subject oil operations was approved. 27. Inspection, Enforcement and Compatibility Review. To ensure that adequate funds are available for the legiti- mate and anticipated costs incurred for monitoring and enforcement activities associated with new or modified oil- and gas - related conditional use permits, the permittee shall deposit with the city funds, determined on a case -by- case basis, prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance. The funds shall also cover the costs for any other necessary inspections or the resolution of confirmed violations that may occur. One (1) deposit may be made to cover all of the permittees various permits. In addition, all new or modified conditional use permits for oil- and gas- related uses shall, at the discretion of the director of community development, be conditioned to require a compatibility review on a periodic basis. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the permit, as conditioned, has remained consistent with its findings for approval and if there are grounds for proceeding with public hearings concerning modification, suspension or revocation of the permit. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -5), 1994) 17.28.070 Produce stands. A. One (1) produce stand per lot is allowed. B. A produce stand shall be permitted only if accessory to permitted crop production on the same lot, and only if at least twenty -five percent (25 %) of the area of the lot is devoted to crop production. C. A produce stand may sell raw unprocessed fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds and cut flowers grown on the same lot and on other lots in the city. D. A produce stand may sell only those ornamental plants that are grown on the same lot as such stand is located. E. No commodities other than those listed above may be sold from a produce stand. F. The floor area of such stand shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet each. G. Such stand shall not be located or maintained within thirty (30) feet of any public road, street or highway. This setback area shall be kept free to provide for off -street parking. H. The construction thereof shall be of a temporary nature and shall not include a permanent foundation. 17.28.070 I. A produce stand may have one (1) freestanding sign and one (1) attached sign, in addition to the attached or freestanding sign otherwise allowed on the property, provided that the respective area limits for attached and freestanding signs, pursuant to Chapter 17.40, are not exceeded in the aggregate. A sign for a produce stand may have a commercial message. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -6), 1994) 17.28.080 Recreational vehicle parks. Each application for the development of a recreational vehicle park, as defined in Title 25 of the California Admin- istrative Code under "recreational trailer park," shall be subject to the following regulations. A. Development Standards. 1. Minimum lot area for a recreational vehicle park shall be three (3) acres. 2. Minimum percentage of the net area of each recre- ational vehicle park which shall be left in its natural state or be landscaped shall be sixty percent (60%). 3. The maximum size of a recreational vehicle occupy- ing a space in the park shall be two hundred twenty (220) square feet of living area. Living area does not include built -in equipment such as wardrobes, closets, cabinets, kitchen units or fixtures, or bath and toilet rooms. 4. Building height and setbacks shall be as prescribed in the applicable zone, except where Title 25 of the Califor- nia Administrative Code is more restrictive. 45. No recreational vehicle or accessory building shall be located less than six (6) feet from any other recreational vehicle or accessory building on an adjacent space. 6. The distance from any picnic table to a toilet should be not less than one hundred (100) feet nor more than three hundred (300) feet. 7. All setbacks from streets and other areas in a recre- ational vehicle park not used for driveways, parking, buildings or service areas shall be landscaped. 8. Trash collection areas shall be adequately distributed and enclosed by a six (6) foot high landscape screen, solid wall or fence, which is accessible on one (1) side. 9. The minimum size of each recreational campsite shall be one thousand (1,000) square feet, and the minimum width shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 10. Any of the foregoing standards may be modified subject to the provisions of Title 25, if evidence presented to the decision - making authority establishes that such modification is necessary to ensure compatibility with the established environmental setting. 11. The maximum number of trailer spaces per net acre of land shall be eighteen (18), unless a lower maximum is specified in the conditional use permit for the park. B. Site Design Criteria. 338 1. Each space should have a level, landscaped front yard area with picnic table and a grill or campfire ring. 2. The office should be located near the entrance, which should also be the exit. 3. The site should be designed to accommodate both tent and vehicle campers (travel trailers, truck campers, camping trailers, motor homes) and shall be designed so as to minimize conflicts between vehicles and people. 4. Drive- through spaces should be provided for towed trailers. 5. Walls or landscaped earthen berms should be used to minimize noise from highway sources. 6. Utility conduits shall be installed underground in conformance with applicable state and local regulations. 7. Intensity of development in Los Padres National Forest shall not exceed permissible standards of the United States Forest Service Manual, April, 1970, Title 2300 — Recreation Management, experience level three (3), as may be amended from time to time, unless evidence presented to the decision - making authority demonstrates a necessity and desirability to deviate from such standards, or unless otherwise specified in this title. 8. Roadways and vehicle pads shall not be permitted in areas of natural slope inclinations greater than fifteen percent (15 %) or where grading would result in slope heights greater than ten (10) feet and steeper than 2:1. 9. Where needed to enhance aesthetics or to ensure public safety, a fence, wall, landscape screen, earth mound or other screening approved by the director of community development shall enclose the park. 10. Each site plan should also incorporate a recreational or utility building, laundry facilities and an entrance sign, made from natural materials, which blends with the land- scape. 11. Each park shall be provided with sewer connections or dump stations, or a combination thereof, to serve the recreational vehicles. C. Additional Provisions. 1. Each park may include a commercial establishment on -site, not exceeding five hundred (500) square feet of floor area, for the sole use of park residents. 2. Each park is permitted one (1) on -site mobilehome to be used solely for the management and operation of the park, pursuant to Title 25 of the California Administra- tive Code. 3. No permanent building or cabana shall be installed or constructed on any trailer space; however, portable accessory structures and fixtures are permitted. 4. No travel trailers, trailer coaches, motorhomes, campers or tents shall be offered for sale, lease or rent within a recreational vehicle park. 5. Off -road motor vehicle uses which might cause damage to vegetation or soil stability shall not be permitted 6. The maximum time of occupancy for any family or recreational vehicle within any recreational vehicle park shall be ninety (90) days within any one hundred twenty (120) day period. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -7), 1994) 17.28.090 Restaurants, bars and taverns. A maximum of two (2) pool or billiard tables may be accessory to this use. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -8), 1994) 17.28.100 Mining and reclamation. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish reasonable and uniform limitations, safeguards and controls for mining and accessory uses which will allow for the reasonable use of an important city resource. These regula- tions shall also ensure that mining activities will be conduct- ed in harmony with the environment and other uses of land within the city and that mineral sites will be appropriately reclaimed. B. Application. Unless otherwise indicated herein, the purpose, intent and provisions of Section 17.28. 100 et seq. shall be and are automatically imposed and made a part of any permit for mining development issued by the city on or after April 11, 1985. Furthermore, said provisions shall apply to any mining development operation initiated on or after April 11, 1985, upon federally owned lands for which it has been determined that no land use permit is required by the city. C. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined herein, or unless the text clearly indicates otherwise, the definition of mining shall be that defined in this title. D. Required Permits. No mining- related use may commence without the appropriate conditional use permit required pursuant to this title. Furthermore, a zoning clearance must be obtained by the permittee prior to com- mencing activities authorized by the conditional use permit, as it may be modified. The issuance of a conditional use permit shall not relieve the operator of the responsibility of securing and complying with any other permit which may be required by other city ordinances, or state or federal laws. No condition of a conditional use permit for uses allowed by this title shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one (1) set of rules apply, the stricter one shall take precedence. E. Mining and Reclamation Guidelines. The general guidelines that follow shall be used in the development of conditions which will help ensure that mining projects generate minimal negative impacts on the environment. The guidelines shall be applied whenever physically and 339 17.28.080 economically feasible or practicable, unless the strict application of a particular guideline(s) would otherwise defeat the intent of other guidelines. An applicant should use the guidelines in the design of the project and anticipate their use as permit conditions, unless the applicant can demonstrate that they are not physically or economically feasible or practicable. 1. All mining and reclamation shall be consistent with the city general plan, the county water quality management plan (208 plan) and the State Surface Mining and Reclama- tion Act of 1975 (SMARA), as amended, and state policy adopted pursuant to SMARA. 2. Mining and accessory uses of less than nine (9) months in duration are not renewable nor are such uses allowed to continue operating for any reason beyond nine (9) months after issuance of the permit. 3. No provisions in this title or in the city general plan shall be construed to encourage any mining operation or facility which would endanger the public's health, safety or welfare, which would endanger private or public facilities or which would prohibit the alleviation of a hazard by hampering or precluding such activities as the maintenance, restoration or construction of public works facilities. 4. In general, projects shall be located, designed and operated so as to minimize their adverse impact on the physical and social environment, including nanual resources. To this end, dust, noise, vibration, noxious odors, intrusive light, aesthetic impacts, traffic impacts and other factors of nuisance and annoyance, erosion and flooding shall be reduced to a minimum or eliminated through the best accepted mining and reclamation practices, applicable to local conditions, which are consistent with contemporary principles and knowledge of resource management, flood control engineering and floodplain management. 5. The extraction of aggregate shall strike a reasonable balance with other resource priorities such as water, farm- land, fish and wildlife and their habitat, sediment for replenishment and the protection of public and private structures and facilities. 6. The extraction of aggregate resources in rivers and streams shall allow for the ongoing maintenance of viable riparian ecology by preserving as many natural stream elements as practical. Mining operations may provide for the enhancement of some riparian ecosystems as a mitiga- tion to compensate for significant adverse environmental effects on other riparian ecosystems, thereby preserving the overall quality of the riparian environment. 7. Appropriate and reasonable monitoring and enforce- ment measures shall be imposed on each mining operation which will ensure that all permit conditions, guidelines and standards of Section 17.28. 100 et seq. are fulfilled. 17.28.100 8. Reclamation of a site shall include the removal of equipment and facilities and the restoration of the site so that it is suitable for subsequent uses which are consistent with the plans for the area as well as the existing and proposed uses in the general area. Reclamation shall be conducted in phases on an ongoing basis, where feasible. F. Mining and Reclamation Standards. The following are minimum standards and requirements which shall be- applied pursuant to subsection B of this section. 1. General Mining Standards. Projects shall be located, designed, operated and notice of their activities provided so as to minimize their adverse impact on the physical and social environment and natural resources. To this end, dust, noise, vibration, noxious odors, intrusive light, aesthetics, traffic impacts and other factors of nuisance and annoyance, erosion and flooding shall be reduced to a minimum or eliminated through the best accepted practices which are applicable to local conditions and incident to the exploration for and extraction of aggregate resources. In addition, mitigation measures should be consistent with contemporary principles and knowledge of resource management, flood control engineering and floodplain management. Further, posting of signs and notification to neighboring property owners of the project's activities shall be required where necessary. 2. Setbacks. No processing equipment or facilities shall be Permanently located and no mining shall occur within the horizontal setbacks specified below: a. One hundred (100) feet of any dedicated public street or highway unless the public works agency determines a lesser distance would be acceptable; b. One hundred (100) feet of any dwelling not accesso- ry to the project, unless a waiver is signed pursuant to subsection (F)(13) of this section allowing the setback to be reduced. In no case shall permanent processing facilities, equipment or mining be located less than fifty (50) feet from said structures. c. Two hundred (200) feet of any institution, school or other building used as a place of'public assemblage, unless a waiver is signed pursuant to subsection (F)(13) of this section allowing the setback to be reduced. In no case shall permanent processing facilities or equipment or mining be located less than one hundred (100) feet from said structures. Other facilities and structures shall be set back distances which are applicable for accessory structures for the zone in which the use is located. 3. Obstruction of Drainage Courses. Mining operations, access roads, facilities, stockpiling of mineral resources and related mining activities shall be consistent with current engineering and public works standards and in no case shall obstruct, divert, or otherwise affect the flow of natural 340 drainage and flood waters so as to cause significant adverse impacts, except as authorized by the public works agency. 4. Control of Contaminants, Runoff and Siltation. Contaminants, water runoff and siltation shall be controlled and generally contained on the project site so as to minimize adverse off' -site impacts. 5. Dust Prevention. The project site and all roads or hauling routes located between the public right -of -way and the subject site shall be improved or otherwise treated as required by the city and maintained as necessary to prevent the emanation of dust. 6. Light Emanation. light emanation shall be controlled so as not to produce excessive levels of glare or abnormal light levels directed at any neighboring uses. 7. Painting. All permanent facilities and structures on the site shall be colored so as to mask facilities visible from surroundin-g uses and roadways in the area. Said colors shall also take into account such additional factors as heat buildup and designation of danger areas. Said colors shall be approved by the director of community development prior to painting of facilities. 8. Site Maintenance. The permit area shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner so as not to create unsightly conditions visible from outside the permitted area or any hazardous conditions. Equipment and materials may be stored on the site which are appurtenant to the operation and maintenance of mining operations. 9. Reclamation Plan. No mining permit shall be ap- proved without an approved reclamation plan which is: (1) consistent with the provisions of the state Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 as amended; (2) consistent with public works agency standards; (3) consistent with any and all locally adopted resource management goals and policies; and (4) compatible with the existing geological and topographical features of the area. Additional consider- ations, such as the following, shall also be addressed: a. The creation of safe, stable slopes and the prevention of subsidence; b. Control of water runoff and erosion; c. Views of the site from surrounding areas; d. Availability of backfill material; e . Proposed subsequent use of the land which will be consistent with the general plan and existing and pro- posed uses in the general area; f. Removal or reuse of all structures and equipment; g. The time frame for completing the reclamation; h. The costs of reclamation if the city will need to contract to have it performed; i. Revegetation of the site; j. Phased reclamation of the project area; k. Provisions of appropriate securities to ensure comple- tion of approved reclamation plans. 10. Removal of Equipment. All equipment on the project site shall be removed from the site within one hundred eighty (180) days of the termination of the use, unless a time extension is approved by the director of community development. 11. Application of Sensitive Use Related Standards. The imposition of regulations on mining operations, which are based on distances from occupied sensitive uses, shall only apply to those occupied sensitive uses which were in existence at the time the permit for the subject mining operations was approved. The provisions of this section shall continue for the life of the permitted mining operations at the subject site. 12. Exceptions to Standards. Upon the written request of the permittee, the director of community development may grant temporary exceptions to the noise standards, hours of operation and the conditions of a given permit provided it is deemed necessary because of a declared public emergency or the off -hours scheduling of a public works project where a formal contract to conduct the work in question has been issued. 13. Waivers of Standards. Where provisions exist for the waiver of ordinance requirements, the waiver must be signed by the owner and all adult occupants of a dwelling, or in the case of other sensitive uses, by the owner of the use in question. Once a waiver is granted, the permittee is exempt from affected ordinance requirements relative to the sensitive use in question for the life of the permitted operations. 14. Reporting of Accidents. The pemvttee shall immedi- ately notify the director of community development of any incidents such as fires, explosions, spills, land or slope failures or other conditions at the permit site which could pose a hazard to life or property outside the permit area Upon request of any city agency, the permittee shall provide a written report of any incident within seven (7) calendar days which shall include, but not be limited to, a description of the facts of the incident, the corrective measures used and the steps taken to prevent recurrence of the incident. 15. Contact Person. The permittee shall provide the director of community development with the current name(s) and/or position title, address and phone number of the person who shall receive all orders, notices and communica- tions regarding matters of condition and code compliance. The person(s) in question shall be available by phone during the hours that activities occur on the permit site, even if this means twenty-four (24) hours a day. 16. Current Mining Plans. For mining projects located in sensitive areas which operate under regularly changing environmental conditions (e.g., in -river mining), a mining plan shall be prepared by the permittee on a regular basis in accordance with the applicable conditions of a project's permit. Said plan shall describe how mining over the next 341 17.28.100 interval will be conducted in accordance with the intent and provisions of the project's use permit. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the city at the permince's expense. The review and approval of current mining plans shall not be used in lieu of the formal modification process to change the text and drawings of the permit conditions. 17. Permit Review. Monitoring of the permit or aspects of it may be required as often as necessary to ensure compliance with the permit conditions. In any case, the permit and site shall be reviewed and inspected by the planning division at least once every ten (10) years. The purpose of said review is to ascertain whether the permittee is in compliance with all conditions of the permit, and whether there have been significant changes in environmen- tal conditions, land use or mining technology, or if there is other good cause which would warrant the director of community development's filing of an application for modification of the conditions of the permit. If such an application is filed, it shall be at the city's expense and modification of conditions would not occur without a duly noticed public heating. 18. Enforcement Costs. Permit conditions shall be imposed which will enable the city to recover the reasonable and appropriate costs necessary for the reviewing and monitoring of permit operations and the enforcing of the applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance and the conditions of this permit. 19. Civil Penalties. a. In case of any failure by the permittee to perform or comply with any term or provision of this conditional use permit, the final decision - making authority that would act on the permit may, after notice to the penmittee and a public hearing, determine by resolution the amount of the civil penalty to be levied against the permittee. Said penalty shall be paid within thirty (30) days unless the penalty is under appeal. Failure to pay the penalty within the allotted time period shall be considered grounds for suspension of the subject use, pursuant to Section 17.44.080B. b. The maximum penalty that can be levied against a permittee at any given time shall be in accordance with the amounts set forth below. The amounts for a given permit may be increased to adjust for inflation pursuant to the conditions of the subject permit. Total Perntitted Extraction Applicable Civil (Life of the Project) Penalty Ceiling Less than 10,000 cu. yards $ 5,000.00 10,000 to 99,999 cu. yards 10,000.00 100,000 to 999,999 cu. yards 15,000.00 1,000,000+ cu. yards 25,000.00 J.. 17.28.100 20. Performance Securities. Performance bonds or other securities may be imposed on any permit to ensure compli- ance with certain specific tasks or aspects of the permit. The amount of the security shall be based upon the actual anticipated costs for completing the subject task if the city were forced to complete it rather than the permittee. The performance security may be posted in phases as tasks are undertaken or required to be completed. 21. Insurance. The permittee shall maintain, for the life of the permit, liability insurance of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) for one (1) person and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for all persons, and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) for property dam- age. This requirement does not preclude the permittee from being self - insured. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -9), 1994) 17.28.110 Veterinary clinics. Veterinary clinics must be housed in a completely enclosed, soundproof building, except as provided in Section 17.28.180. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -10), 1994) 17.28.120 Motion picture and TV production, temporary. Such outdoor filming shall not result in high or unreason- able levels of light, glare or noise being directed toward neighboring properties, and shall not cause disturbances in normal traffic flows, nor cause damage to flora or fauna. The applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits and approvals from the city and other city departments, and shall restore the property to its original condition when such filming is completed. The time limits stated in Chapter 17.20 for temporary filming apply to individual lots. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -11), 1994) 17 .28.130 Outdoor sales and services, temporary. Such uses are permitted for one (1) calendar day in any ninety (90) day period, provided that they do not disrupt normal traffic flows and do not result in the blocking of public rights -of -way, puking lot aisles or required parking spaces. All related facilities and materials shall be removed on the departure of the use. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -12), 1994) 17.28.140 Christmas tree sales. The outdoor sale of trees and wreaths for festive or ornamental purposes is permitted during the forty -five (45) day period immediately preceding December 25th. Such sales activities shall not disrupt normal traffic flows, nor result in the blocking of public rights -of -way, parking lot aisles or required parking spaces. All related structures, facilities and materials shall be removed by December 31st of the same year. Christmas tree sales are allowed one (1) 342 temporary, unlighted identification sign not exceeding twenty (20) square feet in area. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -13), 1994) 17.28.150 Temporary buildings during construction. A mobilehome, recreational vehicle or commercial each may be used as a temporary dwelling unit or office on a construction site in accordance with Section 17.20.060, provided that a building permit for such construction is in full force and effect on the same site. The unit shall be connected to a water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the Ventura County environmental health division, and shall be removed from the site within forty- five (45) days after a clearance for occupancy is issued by the city department of building and safety. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -14), 1994) 17.28.160 Storage of building materials, temporary. The temporary storage of construction materials is permitted on a lot adjacent to one on which a valid zoning clearance and building permit allowing such construction is in force, or on a project site within a recorded subdivi- sion. Such storage is permitted during construction and for forty-five (45) days thereafter. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -15), 1994) 17.28.170 Campgrounds. Campgrounds shall be developed in accordance with the following standards: A. Minimum lot area shall be three (3) acres. B. At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the total site shall be left in its natural state or be landscaped. The remaining twenty -five percent (25%) of land is eligible for development. C. Each individual camp site shall be no less than one thousand (1,000) sq. ft. and there shall be no more than nine (9) sites per developable acre. Group camp sites shall be designed to accommodate no more than twenty-five (25) people per acre. D. Where needed to enhance aesthetics or to ensure public safety, a fence, wall, landscaping screen, earth mound or other screening approved by the director of community development shall enclose the campground. E. Utility conduits shall be installed underground in conformance with applicable state and local regulations. F.. The design of structures and facilities, and the site as a whole shall be in harmony with the natural surround- ings to the maximum feasible extent. G. Trash collection areas shall be adequately distributed and enclosed by a six (6) foot high landscape screen, solid wall or fence, which is accessible on one (1) side. H. Off -road motor vehicle uses are not permitted. I. The following standards apply to structures on the site, apart from the personal residence(s) of the property owner, campground director /manager or caretaker: 1. Structures are limited to restrooms/showers and a clubhouse for cooking and/or minor recreational purposes. 2. There shall not be more than one set of enclosed, kitchen - related fixtures. 3. There shall be no buildings that are used or intended to be used for sleeping. J. Campgrounds may include minor accessory recre- ational uses such as swimming pools (limit one(1)) and tennis courts. K. Outdoor tent- camping is permitted. L. No hook -ups for recreational vehicles are allowed. M. Occupation of the site by a guest shall not exceed thirty (30) consecutive days. N. Parking Standards. See Section 17.32.01 OFF. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -16), 1994) 17.28.180 Camps. Camps shall be developed in accordance with the follow- ing standards: A. Minimum lot area shall be ten (10) acres. B. Overnight population of guests and staff shall be limited by the following calculations: 1. Camps on property zoned nual agricultural (R -A)- lot size in acres x 2.56 = the maximum number of persons to be accommodated overnight; 2. Camps on property zoned rural exclusive (R -E)- lot size in acres x 10.24 = the maximum number of persons to be accommodated overnight. C. Total daily on -site population of guests and staff shall be limited by the following calculations: 1. Camps zoned rural agricultural (R -A) — 5.12 x lot size in gross acres = total population allowed on site. 2. Camps zoned rural exclusive (R -E) — 20.48 x lot size in gross acres = total population allowed on site. 3. A larger total daily population may be allowed for special events, the frequency to be determined by the camp's use permit. D. Building intensity shall be limited by the following standards: 1. Overnight Accommodations. Structures or portions of structures intended for sleeping and restrooms/showers (excepting those for permanent staff as defined in subsection (Dx3) of this section shall be limited to a collective average of two hundred (200) square feet per overnight guest and 343 17.28.170 staff allowed per subsection B of this section (overnight population). 2. All Other Roofed Structures or Buildings. The total allowed square footage of all roofed structures or buildings other than sleeping and restroom/shower facilities shall be limited to one hundred (100) square feet per person allowed per subsection C of this section (daily on -site population). 3. The residence(s) of a limited number of permanent staff such as the director, manager or caretaker are exempt from the limitations of subsection (D)(1) of this section (overnight accommodations). 4. Since the two (2) building intensity standards (overnight and total daily) address distinctly different facilities, they shall not be interchangeable or subject to borrowing or substitutions. E. Camp facilities shall have adequate sewage disposal and domestic water. F. Camp facility lighting shall be designed so as to not produce a significant amount of light and/or glare at the fast off -site receptive use. G. Camp facilities shall be developed in accordance with applicable city standards so as to not produce a significant amount of noise. H. Occupation of the site by a guest shall not exceed thirty (30) consecutive days. 1. To ensure that the site remains an integral and cohesive unit, specific methods such as the following should be employed on a case -by -case basis: open space easements, CC&R's that restrict further use of the land with the city as a third party; low density zoning to prevent subdivision of the site; and/or merger of parcels to create one (1) parcel covering the entire site. J. To avoid the loss of the site's natural characteristics several methods should be employed on a case -by -case basis to preserve these values: sixty percent (60%) of the total site should remain in its natural state or be landscaped and only passive recreational uses should be permitted. K. Parking Standards. See Section 17.32.01 OFF. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -17), 1994) 17.28.190 Retreats. A. The minimum lot size for a retreat is five (5) acres. B. A retreat shall not have sleeping accommodations for more than twenty (20) people. C. Floor area shall be limited to the following: 1. Maximum two hundred (200) square feet for each overnight guest, for sleeping and restroom facilities; 2. Maximum two thousand (2,000) square feet for all other buildings (other than structures for animals), such as kitchen and dining areas, conference rooms, storage, and the like. 17.28.190 D. No retreat structures shall exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet. E. A retreat may include minor accessory recreational facilities such as horse facilities, equestrian trails, hot tubs, one swimming pool and one (1) tennis court. F. Structures related to a retreat shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from public roads. Foliage and natural topography shall be used to the maximum feasible extent for screening of retreat structures from public rights -of -way and from residential uses on adjacent proper- ties. G. Lighting for nighttime activities shall be directed away from adjacent properties. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -18), 1994) 17.28.200 Golf courses. A golf course may include accessory structures as needed for maintenance and for players on a day of golfing, in- cluding a maintenance building, a pro shop, restrooms and limited eating facilities. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -19), 1994) 17.28.210 Buildings for the growing of crops. Greenhouses, hothouses and the like shall be set back at least twenty (20) feet from all property lines. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -20), 1994) 17.28.220 Temporary pet vaccination clinics. Temporary pet vaccination clinics, as provided for in Section 17.20.060, are subject to the following regulations: A. Any such clinic shall operate no more than one (1) day in any ninety (90) day period within a one (1) mile radius of a previously conducted temporary clinic. B. Such clinics shall provide preventive medical care only, and shall not diagnose or treat injured, sick or diseased animals, except to the extent necessary to provide immuni- zation or vaccination. C. All vaccinations shall be performed inside a trailer or other portable structure. D. Such clinics shall provide their services only during daylight hours. E. Such clinics shall not disrupt normal traffic flows, and shall not result in the blocking of public rights -0f - -way or parking lot aisles. All related materials and facilities shall be removed on the departure of the clinic. F. Facilities for the treatment and disposal of urine and fecal wastes attributable to the clinic shall be provided and utilized as necessary to keep the clinic and areas within a one hundred (100) foot radius thereof clean and free of flies and odors. G. Sufficient staff, other than those administering vaccinations, shall be available at the expense of the clinic operator to control crowds, assist with the handling of 344 animals and keep the area clean. At least two (2) such staff shall be provided in all cases. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -21), 1994) 17.28.230 Day care facilities. A. Care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons are subject to all development standards and requirements applicable to single - family dwellings. B. Day care facilities for seven (7) to twelve (12) children, inclusive, including the children who reside at the home, are subject to the procedural requirements of Section 1597.46(a)(3) of the Health and Safety Code. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -22), 1994) 17.28.240 Nonmotorized wheeled conveyance facilities and uses. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish reasonable and uniform limitations, safeguards and controls for the design, placement and use of facilities and structures (hereinafter referred to as "facilities ") for the nonmotorized wheeled conveyances such as, but not limited to: skate- boards, bicycles, unicycles, tricycles and roller skates. Such regulations are established to minimize the impact on neighboring uses such as, but not limited to: unsightly structures, noise, loss of privacy, traffic congestion, trespass- ing, and risk of damage or injury from flying projectiles and debris. B. Application. 1. Facilities less than forty-two (42) inches in height above adjacent finished grade level, which cover less than thirty -two (32) square feet of aggregate ground area, and do not have a platform on which to stand, are exempt from the requirements of subsections C through J of this section. Such exempt facilities must otherwise meet the provisions of the zoning ordinance. 2. Those facilities not exempt may be permitted upon issuance of a zoning clearance provided all standards of this title are met. 3. Facilities that exceed the standards set forth in subsections C through G of this section may be authorized by a conditional use permit approved by the director of community development. C. Size. No point on a facility shall extend more than eight (8) feet above adjacent finished grade level and no facility or collection of facilities on a given lot shall cover more than four hundred (400) square feet of aggregate ground area. D. Setbacks. All facilities shall be set back the follow- ing distances from all other structures and property lines: 1. All facilities shall be set back a minimum of six (6) feet from all other structures. -y 2. AU facilities shall be set back a minimum of twenty (20) feet from all property lines with an additional five (5) feet of setback required for each one (1) foot in- crease of height over six (6) feet above adjacent finished grade level. 3. Facilities shall not be located in the area between the public or private right -of -way and the front of the resi- dence on the site, unless the facility is not visible from the public or private right -of -way or neighboring dwellings and otherwise conforms to the applicable setback require- ments. E. Construction Standards. All facilities shall be con- structed so as to minimize visual and auditory impacts. 1. The sides of all facilities that are above ground shall be enclosed with a solid material, such as plywood. 2. Spaces between finished grade and the lower; horizontal surfaces of the facility shall be filled with earth or other suitable solid material. 3. The backs of all surfaces not affected by subsec- tion (E)(2) of this section shall be padded with sound - absorbing material such as carpeting. 4. Facilities may be painted, stained, or left in their natural finish. Posters, banners, handbills, bumper stickers, or advertising materials of any kind shall not be affixed to the facility, if visible from neighboring properties. F. Number of Persons. The number of persons using a facility or collection of facilities at a given site shall not include more than six (6) individuals who are not residents at the site where the facility is located. G. Hours of Operation. The use of facilities shall be limited to daylight hours between nine (9:00) a.m. and seven (7:00) p.m., Monday through Saturday. H. Maintenance. Facilities shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and orderly manner. I. Removal. Facilities shall be removed within ninety (90) days when no longer used, or capable of being safely used for their intended purpose. J. Hold Harmless. The permittee shall provide the city with a hold harmless agreement, acceptable to the city, prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, which provides, in substance, that the permittee agrees to hold the city harmless, indemnify and defend the city for any loss or damage to property, or injury or loss of life arising out of the use authorized by this zoning clearance. K. Compensation. The use of the facility shall be without monetary compensation to any of the parties in- volved, nor operated in any way as a commercial enter- prise. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -23), 1994) 17.28.240 17.28.250 Caretaker recreational vehicle, accessory. In a park or recreation area owned or operated by the city, the owner(s) of a recreational vehicle which is li- censed and equipped for highway travel may reside in the recreational vehicle for up to six (6) months in any twelve (12) month period, in accordance with an approved park host program. Sewage disposal shall be provided by means of a system approved by the environmental health divi- sion. (Ord. 189 § 3 (8107 -24), 1994) 345 (Moorpark Supp. No I, 12 -02) Chapter 17.44 ENTITLEMENT — PROCESS AND PROCEDURES* Sections: 17.44,010 Purpose. 17.44.020 Legal lot requirement. 17.44.030 Entitlement. 17.44.040 Filing and processing of application requests. 17.44.050 Notice and hearing procedures. 17.44.060 Decisions. 17.44.070 Reapplication. 17,44.080 Modification, suspension and revocation. 17.44.090 Appeals. 17.44.100 Effect of change of zoning regulations. • Prior ordinance history: Ords. 199, 196, 234, 265 and 271 17.44.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish procedures for the processing of land use entitlement, including permits and variances. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.020 Legal lot requirement. No permit shall be issued for construction on a lot, which is not a legal lot, as defined by this title. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.030 Entitlement. A. Discretionary Permits. Entitlement authorized by this title include the following: 1. Types of Discretionary Permits. a. Planned Development (PD) Permit. A planned development permit is a permit based on a discretionary decision required prior to initiation of specified uses and structures, which are permitted within the zone district (as opposed to a conditional use), but which are subject to site plan review and which may be conditioned in order to assure compliance with the requirements of this title and with the purposes of the applicable zone. Planned development permits may be granted by the administrative hearing process or by the planning commis- sion or city council through a public hearing process. This includes industrial planned development (IPD), residential planned development (RPD) and commercial planned development (CPD). b. Conditional Use Permit (CUP). A conditional use permit is a permit based on a discretionary decision required 375 17.44.010 prior to initiation of particular uses not allowed as a matter of right. Such permits are subject to site plan review and may be conditioned at the time of approval. The application for such a use shall be approved. conditionally approved, or denied through a public hearing process before the decision - making authority specified in Table 17.20.060. The procedures for notice of the public hearing, conduct of the hearing and receipt of testimony shall be as specified in Section 17.44.050. The application may be denied on the basis that the applicant has not met the applicable burden of proof required by subsections (A)(2)(a) through (A)(2)(f) of this section. Prior to approving, conditionally approving, or denying an application, the decision - making authority shall make written findings based upon substantial evidence in view of the whole record to justify the decision. With the excep- tion of projects initiated by a city agency or department and for conditional use permits for alcoholic beverages, when the city council is the decision - making authority, the application shall first be reviewed by the planning commission. When the planning commission is the decision - making authority, its decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application may be appealed to the city council pursuant to Section 17.44.090. c. Temporary Special Use Permit (TUP). The director of community development may authorize, by zoning clearance, a use or structure for a temporary period of time (not to exceed ninety (90) days). Where a delay incident to the normal processing of an application would be detri- mental to the applicant or the public, the director of commu- nity development may grant additional ninety (90) day extensions to the temporary special use permit. Temporary use permits shall be considered discretionary permits and as such may be conditioned so as to not be physically detrimental to the health, safety, life or property of the applicant or the public. Examples of temporary use permits include but are not limited to; special events such as Christmas tree sales, promotional parking lot sales, church carnivals, country days and sidewalk sales, provisions for uses for a limited period of time consistent with the zoning district where located. These permits may be reviewed by other affected agen- cies prior to approval. The purpose of the review is to determine if such a requested use is in any way a problem as it relates to the adjacent uses. A temporary use permit may be revoked by the approving authority prior to the expiration date based upon information that the conditions have not been complied with, or other justifiable reason as determined by the approving authority. d. Administrative Permit (AP). An administrative permit is a director of community development approved permit CC ATTACHMENT 5 (Moorpark 7 -01) 17.44.030 based on a discretionary decision required prior to initiation of a use or structure requiring the permit. Administrative permits are subject to site plan review and may be condi- tioned in order to assure compliance with the requirements of this title and with the purposes of the applicable zone. At least ten (10) days prior to approval or denial of the permit, the director of community development shall provide a notice by U.S. mail to surrounding property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the property, as identified by the latest equalized assessment role of Ventura County, of the director's intention to approve or deny the permit. All notices shall include the identity of the director of community development as the approving authority; a general explanation of the matter to be considered; a general description, in text or by diagram, of the subject property; and a final date by which comments must be received by the director of community development for the hearing date. Prior to approval, conditional approval, or denial of the administrative permit, a hearing date shall be set by the director of community development. The public may attend the hearing and give testimony. The director's decision is subject to an appeal period which shall end ten (10) calendar days after the director's decision is rendered pursuant to Section 17.44.060, or on the following workday if the tenth day falls on a weekend or holiday. e. Administrative Permits within the Downtown Specific Plan. Discretionary permits within the boundaries of'the Downtown Specific Plan that may be required by this code for the conversion of a residential building or use to a commercial use or to a commercial office use, or, to provide entitlements where a previous planned development permit has not been issued, shall be subject to the review and approval of the director of community development. Notice and hearing shall be given in the same manner, as that required for an administrative permit as set forth in Section 17.44.030(A)(1)(d). The director's decision is subject to an appeal period which shall end ten (10) days after the director's determination letter is rendered pursuant to Section 17.44.060. Plans similar in content and information to those typically required for a commercial planned development permit (CPD) shall be prepared and submitted as a portion of the application for all discretionary permits within the Down- town Specific Plan area as established by this section. 2. Discretionary Permit Standards. Planned develop- ment, conditional use permits, administrative permits and temporary use permits may only be granted if all billed fees and charges for processing the application request that are due for payment have been paid. All of the standards of subsections (A)(2)(a) through (A)(2)(f) of this section must be met. The decision - making authority may impose such conditions and limitations, including time limits, it (Moorpark 7 -01) 376 deems necessary to allow the standards to be met. The applicant shall have the burden of proving to the satisfaction of the appropriate decision - making authority that the proposed development: a. Is consistent with the intent and provisions of the city's general plan, and any applicable specific plan and this title; b. Is compatible with the character of surrounding development; c. Would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses; d. Would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare; e. If a conditionally permitted use, is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located; and f. Is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. 3. Additional Standards for A -E Zone. In addition to the provisions of subsection (A)(2) of this section, before any permit is issued for any land use which requires a conditional use permit in the A -E zone, the following standards shall be met or be capable of being met with appropriate conditions and limitations being placed on the use: a. That the establishment or maintenance of this use will not significantly reduce, restrict or adversely affect agricultural resources or the viability of agricultural opera- tions in the area; b. That structures will be sited to minimize conflicts with agriculture and that other uses will not significantly reduce, restrict or adversely affect agricultural activities on -site or in the area, where applicable; and c. That the use will be sited to remove as little land from agricultural production (or potential agricultural production) as possible. 4. Compliance with Other Documents. When necessary to ensure consistency with other city planning documents such as, but not limited to, specific plans, conditions which are more restrictive than the standards of this title may be imposed on discretionary permits. 5. Additional Standards for Overlay Zone. In addition to the provisions of subsection (A)(2) of this section, development within any overlay zone having specific development standards, pursuant to Chapter 17.36, must comply with such standards. 6. Additional Standard for Hazardous Waste Facilities. For any proposed development of a hazardous waste facility, the following additional standard must be made or be capable of being made with conditions and limitations being placed on the use: That the proposed hazardous waste facility is consistent with the portions of the county hazardous waste manage- ment plan which identifies specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. 7. Additional Standards for Establishments Selling Alcoholic Beverages. If the proposed development is an establishment selling alcoholic beverages, the applicant shall have the burden of proving, in addition to the provi- sions of subsection (A)(2) of this section, that: a. The use will not result in an over concentration in the area of establishments selling alcoholic beverages; b. The use will serve a public convenience; c. The use will not create the need for increased police services; d. The requested use at the proposed location will not adversely affect the economic welfare of the community; and e. The exterior appearance of the structure will not be inconsistent with the external appearance of commercial structures already constructed or under construction on surrounding properties, or within the immediate neighbor- hood so as to cause blight, deterioration or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. B. Other Entitlement. 1. Zoning Clearance. A zoning clearance is a permit which is granted on the basis of a ministerial decision by the director of community development or designee without a hearing. A zoning clearance certifies that a proposed use of land or structures meets all requirements of this title and the applicable conditions of any previously approved permit. a. Applicability of Zoning Clearance. Except as provid- ed in Section 17.20.030, a zoning clearance is required prior to the implementation of uses of land or structures, construction requiring building permits, and the commence- ment of any activity authorized by a permit or subdivision granted in accordance with the zoning and subdivision ordinances of the city. A zoning clearance shall be issued if the proposed use of land or structures: i. Is permissible under the present zoning on the land and the city's zoning and subdivision ordinances; ii. Is compatible with the policies and land use designa- tions specified in the general plan, and any applicable specific plan; iii. Complies with the applicable terms and conditions of any applicable permit or other entitlement; iv. Is not located on the same lot where a violation of this title exists or of the terms of an existing permit 17.44.030 covering the lot, unless the zoning clearance is necessary to the abatement of the existing violation; v. Is not being requested by or on a site or for the same party that owes the city fees for charges under Section 17.44.040H; vi. Is not located on the same lot where a violation exists of any city ordinance regulating land use, such as the city building code or any grading ordinance; and vii. Is consistent with the portions of the county hazard- ous waste management plan which identifies specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. b. Expiration. Zoning clearances shall expire one hundred eighty (180) days after issuance, unless otherwise indicated on the clearance or unless the use of land or structures or building construction has commenced and is being diligently pursued, as evidenced by current inspec- tions and/or valid building permits. C. Variances. Variances are adjustments in the regula- tions contained in this title. Variances are based on discre- tionary decisions and may be granted to allow deviations from ordinance regulations governing such development factors as setbacks, height, lot coverage, lot area and width, signs, off -street parking, landscaping and wall, fencing and screening standards. Variances shall be processed in accor- dance with the provisions of this chapter. Variances may not be granted to authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulations governing the property. Except as provided in subsection D of this section, variance requests shall be heard by the planning commission through a public hearing process. 1. Purpose. The sole purpose of any variance shall be to enable a property owner to make reasonable use of his or her property in the manner in which other property of like character in the same vicinity and zone can be used. 2. Standards for Variances. Before any variance may be granted, the applicant must establish, and the decision - making authority must determine, that all of the following standards are met: a. That there are special circumstances applicable to the subject property with regard to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, such that the strict application of the zoning regulations denies the property owner privileg es enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zoning districts; and b. That granting the requested variance will not confer a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and c. That strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property will result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations; and 377 (Moorpark 7 -01) 17.44.030 d. That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, nor to the use, enjoyment or valuation of neighboring properties; and e. That the granting of a variance in conjunction with a hazardous waste facility will be consistent with the portions of the county's hazardous waste management plan (CHWW) which identifies specific sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. 3. Burden of Proof. The applicant shall have the burden of proving to the satisfaction of the appropriate decision - making authority that the above standards are met. 4. Duration. Any variance remains valid for so long as the use or structure which requires the variance(s) continues. D. Administrative Exception. 1. A requesi for a minor exception from standards of zoning regulations may be approved by the director of community development as an administrative exception, upon making the following findings: a. That the granting of the exception will not create impacts to abutting properties; and b. That the strict application of the zoning regulations as they apply to the subject property will result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose of such regulations; and c. That the granting of the exception is consistent with the general plan and/or any applicable specific plan. 2. The director of community development shall provide a notice of the request, the date when the action is to be taken and a request for written comments for or against the request. The notice shall be mailed to all sur- rounding property owners, within three hundred (300) feet of the property, whose names appear on the latest- equalized assessment roll of Ventura County. A copy of the notice shall be provided to the city council, planning commission and the city manager. An administrative exception may be granted only in the following situations: a. To allow a decrease not to exceed twenty percent (20 %) in any required minimum setback, provided that such exception may be granted only once from the minimum standard adopted by this code or any planned development permit approved consistent with this code; b. To allow a decrease not to exceed ten percent (10 %) in required parking aisle width or similar dimensional requirements; c. To allow walls, fences or hedges to exceed the height limit regulations by a maximum of one (1) foot in setback areas, except in a required sight triangle; d. To allow an increase not to exceed ten percent (10%) for maximum building coverage, or sign area or sign height; (Moorpark 7 -01) 378 e. To allow a five - percent (5%) decrease in the requited lot area for second units. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.040 Filing and processing of application requests. A. Submission of Applications. An application for a permit or variance may be filed by the owner of the proper- ty or his/her authorized agent, a lessee who holds a lease whose terms permit the use applied for, or by any duly constituted government authority or agent thereof. Such application requests shall be filed with the department of community development. No application request shall be accepted for filing and processing unless it conforms to the requirements of this title, contains in a full, true and correct form the required materials and information pre- scribed by the forms supplied by the department of commu- nity development and is accompanied by the appropriate processing fees. B. Existing Violations. No application request for an entitlement shall be accepted if a violation of the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or municipal code exists on the lot, provided that the violation was a result of the actions or inactions of the applicant or his predecessor(s) in interest, until the violation is abated, unless the accep- tance of the application is necessary to the abatement of the existing violation. C. Content of Applications. The content of applications shall be determined by the city. Site plans and elevations (in color, with building materials identified), sample floor plans and samples of exterior finishing materials may be required as part of the permit procedure. If the project is proposed to be developed in phases, the sequence of such phases shall also be shown. D. Completeness of Application. The applicant shall be notified in writing as to whether the application is complete or incomplete, no later than thirty calendar days after the city has accepted an application under this title, except in the case of zone changes and general plan amend- ments, which are legislative acts and thus are not subject to the thirty (30) day limit. If the application is determined to be incomplete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of the reasons for such determination and of the information needed to make the application complete. 1. Review of Supplemental Information. If an applica- tion is deemed incomplete and the applicant subsequently submits the required information, a new thirty (30) day review period begins on the day that the supplemental information is submitted. 2. Termination of Incomplete Application. Upon written notification to the applicant, processing of an incomplete application may be terminated if no reasonable effort has been made by the applicant to complete the application for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of notification of incompleteness. All unused fees shall be refunded to the applicant. An extension to this ninety (90) day period may be granted by the director of community development upon written request by the applicant showing good cause. E. Review and Conditioning of Applications. Applica- tions and proposed uses shall be reviewed to determine the appropriate environmental document, and, by various city departments as well as interested parties such as cities and special districts which are involved in the review and conditioning of projects. 1. Consultant Review. City staff may refer any applica- tion request to an independent, qualified consultant for review and evaluation of issues beyond the expertise or staffing capabilities of the city. The costs for all such consultant work combined with the administrative charge in effect at the time for management of the consultant contract shall be bome by the applicant and are independent of the fees paid to the city for the processing of the applica- tion request. 2. Securities. Except as otherwise specified in this title, the decision - making authority may impose a penal and/or performance security on any discretionary entitlement as a condition of such entitlement. The security(s) shall be filed in a form acceptable to the city attorney and certified by the city clerk a. The required amount of the security(s) may be increased periodically by the director of community develop- ment in order to compensate for inflation (based on the applicable regional Consumer Price Index) or other factors, so that the same relative value of the security is maintained over the life of the permit, and to assure that performance securities continue to reflect the actual anticipated costs for completing a required task No security shall be released until after all of the applicable conditions of the permit have been met. b. In the event of any failure by the permittee to perform or comply with any term or condition of a discre- tionary entitlement, the decision - making authority may, after notice to the permittee and after a public hearing, determine by resolution the amount of the penalty, and declare all or part of the security forfeited The sureties and principal will be jointly and severally obligated to pay forthwith the full amount of the forfeiture to the city. The forfeiture of any security shall not insulate the permittee from liability in excess of the sum of the security for damages or injury, nor from expense or liability suffered by the city from any breach by the permittee of any term or condition of the permit or of any applicable ordinance or of the security. c. The pemtittee shall maintain the minimum specified amount of a penal security throughout the life of the 17.44.040 entitlement. Within thirty (30) days of any forfeiture of a penal security, the permittee shall restore the security to the required level. 3. Abandoned OiVGas Wells. All projects will be reviewed for location over or near any abandoned or idle - deserted oil or gas well, based on maps provided by the State of California Division of Oil and Gas (D.O.G.). In addition, project applicants shall notify the city and D.O.G. immediately when such wells are encountered in site preparation or construction. Applicants shall bear the cost of re- abandonment if required prior to project approval. The city will notify D.O.G. of the location of any proposed project that is found to be over or near any such well(s). F. Vesting of Rights. No person obtains any right or privilege to use land or structures for any purpose or in any manner described in an application merely by virtue of the city's acceptance of an application. G. Amendments to this Title. An application to amend this title shall be proposed in accordance with Chapter 17.60. H.1. Fees. Each application request for any purpose subject to the regulations of this title, except appeals, shall be accompanied by payment of all outstanding fees and charges billed by and owed to the city by the applicant or by persons, partnerships, corporations or other entities owned or controlled by the applicant. Each application request for any purpose, including appeals and requests for presubmittal review, shall be accompanied by the fee specified by resolution of the city council, before it is accepted for filing and processing. 2. Exemptions. No filing fee shall be charged or collected for any application or appeal filed and signed by two planning commissioners or any individual city councilmember in their official capacity. 3. Penalty Fees. Where a use actually commences, or construction to that end is commenced, prior to the granting of the required permit or variance, the fee for said permit or variance shall be doubled, provided that the city has notified the property owner of the violation. Payment of such double fee shall not relieve persons from fully complying with the requirements of this code, nor from any other penalties prescribed herein. 4. Failure to Pay. The city may include as a condition of approval the requirement to pay all outstanding fees and charges consistent with the adopted city fee resolution. I. Continuance of Permit During Application Renewal Process. 1. Unless otherwise provided in the conditions of the permit, permits being processed for renewal shall remain in full force and effect until the renewal request is acted on and all administrative appeals have been exhausted, 379 (Moorpark 7-01) 17.44.040 provided that the renewal application was accepted as complete by the city prior to the expiration of the permit. 2. All the terms and conditions of the original permit must be followed at all times. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.050 Notice and hearing procedures. A. Notice. 1. Hearing notices prepared pursuant to this chapter for subdivision matters, planned development permits, general plan amendments and zone changes, shall include the date, time and place of the hearing, the identity of the hearing body or officer, a general explanation of the matter to be considered, and a general description, in text or by diagram, of the subject property. 2. Whenever a hearing is required under this chapter before an application can be acted upon, the city shall set a date, time and place for the matter to be heard, and shall give public notice of the hearing by publication in a newspa- per of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the city at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The property shall be posted with a sign as required by applicable provisions of this chapter. 3. In addition, if the hearing involves a discretionary permit (other than an emergency use authorization) or modification thereto, a variance or modification or revoca- tion thereof, an appeal regarding any variance or discretion- ary permit, or a zoning ordinance amendment which affects the permitted uses of property, then a written notice, postage prepaid, shall be mailed to all of the following, pursuant to Government Code Section 65091, as the same may be amended from time to time: a. The owner of the subject property or the owner's duly authorized agent; b. The applicant, if different from the owner; c. Each local agency whose ability to provide essential services or facilities to the project may be significantly affected by the project; and d. The owners of real property situated within a radius of one - thousand (1,000) feet, with the exception of discre- tionary permits identified by Section 17.44.030(A)(1)(e) within the downtown specific plan area, or a variance request associated with one (1) single - family residential dwelling unit, each of which shall have a distance require- ment of three hundred (300) feet of the exterior boundaries of the assessor's parcel(s) which is the subject of the application. Names and addresses shall be obtained by the applicant from the latest equalized assessment roll. If the number of owners exceeds one thousand (1,000), a one - eighth (1/8) page display advertisement published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdiction of the city may be substi- tuted for the direct mailing. Moorpark 7 -01) 380 e. All pare of this code relating to public hearing notices shall be adhered to. 4. Notification shall also be mailed or delivered, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, to any person who has filed a written request for such notice with the director of community development. 5. In the case of appeal hearings, notice shall also be provided to the appellant and, if applicable, to the city official, city councilmember, department, board or commis- sion whose order, requirement, permit, decision or determi- nation is the subject of the appeal. 6. At least eleven (11) days prior to the date of the hearing, the applicant shall post on the property a notice of public hearing. The notice shall be posted in accordance with the provisions contained within this chapter. B. Hearing Procedures. The decision - making authori- ty(s) shall hold at least one (1) public hearing on any duly fled application that requires a discretionary decision. Such hearings shall be conducted in such a manner as to allow the applicant and all other interested parties to be heard and present their positions on the case in question, and shall have a record of the decision kept, along with the findings made which supported the decision. Administrative hearings shall be conducted by the director of community development or designee as specified in Section 17.44.030(A)(1)(d) and are subject to the notice provisions of that section. C. Referrals. A decision - making authority may refer a matter back to the preceding hearing body for further report, information or study. D. Continued Matters. If it is necessary to continue the hearing or decision on any matter before the decision - making authority, the person presiding at the hearing shal l publicly announce the date, time and place certain to which the matter will be continued. Except for the posting of a notice of continued public hearing in a public place, no further notice need be given. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.060 Decisions. The applicant shall receive notice of the final decision - making authority's decision either by the adoption of a resolution (for applications decided in a public hearing) or by the issuance of a determination letter (for applications decided administratively by the director of community development or designee). A resolution or determination letter rendering a decision on an application request shall recite such conditions and limitations deemed necessary by the decision - making authority. A. Referral of Applications. 1. The director of community development may refer any applications or modifications to applications over which the director of community development has authority to the planning commission at any time within thirty (30) days after the close of the administrative hearing if the project: a. May result in significant adverse environmental impacts which cannot be mitigated to insignificant levels; or b. Involves significant public controversy; or c. Is in conflict with city policies, or would necessitate the establishment of new policies; or d. May be precedent - setting; or e. Should be referred for any other cause deemed justifiable by the director of community development. 2. The planning commission may refer a decision on an entitlement to the city council in cases where two (2) entitlements regarding the same property or site are being processed concurrently, and the city council is the decision - making authority for one (1) of the entitlements. 3. Additional applications or modifications to an application that has been referred to and approved by a decision making body shall also be referred to that decision making body. B. Decision Options. The decision - making authority hearing a discretionary matter may approve, conditionally approve, deny or modify, wholly or partly, the request being reviewed. The authority may impose such conditions and limitations as it deems necessary to assure that the general purpose and intent of this title and its various chapters will be observed, and that the public interest, health, safety, convenience and welfare will be served. In the absence of any provision to the contrary in a decision granting a request, said request is granted as set forth in the applica- tion. All conditions and restrictions applied to a decision on an application request not appealed shall automatically continue to govern and limit the subject use or structure unless the action of the decision - making authority clearly indicates otherwise. C. Notice of Decision. Not later than thirty (30) calen- dar days following the effective date of a decision, the city shall provide by U.S. mail a'copy of the decision to the applicant or appellant in resolution or letter form, in care of the address appearing on the application or such other address designated in writing by the applicant or appellant. In addition, the authority and/or agency whose decision is the subject of an appeal shall also be notified of the decision. D. Effective Date of Decisions. 1. An administrative decision or a decision of the planning commission is effective at the expiration of the decision's appeal period unless an appeal, in proper form and addressed to the appropriate decision - making authority, is filed with the director of community development prior to the expiration of the appeal period. 17.44.060 2. A decision of the city council is effective on the date it is rendered. E. Effect of an Appeal. Neither the applicant nor any enforcement agency may rely on an authority's decision until the expiration of the decision's appeal period or until the appeal has been resolved, whichever occurs later. See also Section 17.44.090. Actions by the decision - making authority are stayed pending the consideration of the appeal. F. Implementation. The director of community develop- ment shall be responsible for preparing the resolutions or letters mentioned in this chapter and any other paper or document required by the planning commission or the city council in order to discharge their duties and responsibilities under this chapter and title. It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to ensure that all conditions placed on a permit are met. No permits or zoning clearances may be approved or issued until all conditions required to be completed prior to their issuance are satisfied. G. Expiration. Unless otherwise specified in this title or in the permit conditions, any permit hereafter granted that requires a zoning clearance becomes null and void if a zoning clearance is not obtained by the permittee within the time specified in such permit. If no date is specified, the permit and zoning clearance shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance unless inaugurated. After expira- tion of a zoning clearance and/or permit, the property affected thereby shall be subject to the regulations of the applicable zone classification and all other provisions of this title. The permittee is solely responsible for the timely renewal of any permit. The city has no obligation to notify the permittee of the imminent expiration of the permit. (Ord. 271 § I (part), 2001) 17.44.070 Reapplication. An application request may be denied with prejudice on the grounds that two (2) or more similar application requests have been denied in the past two (2) years. If such denial becomes effective, no further application for the request shall be filed in whole or in part for the ensuing eighteen (18) months except as otherwise specified at the time of the denial, or unless there is a substantial change in the application. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.080 Modification, suspension and revocation. A. Modification of Permits. An application for modifica- tion of a permit or variance pursuant to this section may be filed by any person or entity listed in Section 17.44.040A. Any change of an approved discretionary permit is also a discretionary decision and is considered to fall into one (1) of the following three (3) categories: 1. Reserved. 381 (Moorpark 7 -01) 17.44.080 2. Minor Modification. Any proposed change that exceeds the criteria of a site plan adjustment, but is not extensive enough to be considered a substantial or funda- mental change in land use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties, and would not change any findings contained in the environmental document prepared for the permit, shall be deemed a minor modification and may be acted upon by the director of community development or designee through an administrative hearing process as provided for in Section 17.44.030(A)(1)(d). 3. Major Modification. Any proposed modification which is considered to be a substantial change in land use relative to the original permit, and/or would alter the findings contained in the environmental document prepared for the permit, shall be deemed a major modification and be acted upon by the decision - making authority which approved the original permit. 4. Permit Adjustment. Any change which would not alter any of the findings pursuant to this title, nor any findings contained in the environmental document prepared for the permit, and would not have any adverse impact on surrounding properties, may be deemed a permit adjust- ment and acted upon by the director of community develop- ment or designee without a hearing. There shall be no more than one (1) approved permit adjustment per calendar year. ,Such changes include, but are not limited to, the following: a. An increase or decrease of not more than ten percent (10%) in floor or permit area and an expansion of less than five thousand (5,000) square feet, whichever is less, or in the area of walls, fences or similar structures used as screening, or in height, provision for landscaping or similar standards or dimensions, provided that any increase in parking space requirements can be accommodated on -site; b. Internal remodeling or minor architectural changes or embellishments involving no change in basic architectural style or any change in use where the new use requires the same or a lesser permit than the existing use; or the estab- lishment of a new use in an unoccupied building that has been granted a permit; provided, in both cases, that any increase in parking space requirements can be accommodat- ed on -site. B. Modification, Suspension and Revocation for Cause. Any permit or variance heretofore or hereafter granted may be modified or revoked, or its use suspended, by the same decision - making authority and procedure which would approve the permit or variance under this title provided that in all instances the permittee shall be given notice by U.S. Mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the proposed revocation, modification, or suspension and have an opportunity to be heard by the issuing body prior to any such revocation, modification or suspension. An applica- (Moorpark 7 -01) 382 tion for such modification, suspension or revocation may be filed, along with applicable fees, by any person or entity listed in this chapter, or by any other affected person. The applicant for such modification, suspension or revocation shall have the burden of proving one (1) or more of the following causes: 1. The application request, which was submitted, was not in full, true and correct form. 2. The entitlement, clearance, permit or license issued does not comply with the terms and conditions of the permit originally granting the use under this title. 3. The entitlement clearance, permit or license was issued erroneously. 4. That any term or condition of the permit or variance has not been complied with; 5. That the property subject to the permit or variance, or any portion thereof, is or has been used or maintained in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; 6. That the use for which the variance or permit was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has ceased to exist, or has been aban- doned; 7. That the use for which the permit or variance was granted has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare or as to constitute a nuisance; 8. That changes in technology, or in the type or amount of development in the vicinity of the use, or other good cause warrants modification of conditions of operation or imposition of additional conditions of operation to assure that the use remains compatible with existing and potential uses of other property within the general area in which the use is located. C. Nonwaiver. The failure of the director of community development, planning commission or city council to revoke a variance or permit, or to suspend its use, whenever cause therefor exists or occurs, does not constitute a waiver of such right with respect to any subsequent cause for revoca- tion or suspension of the use. D. Prohibition. No person shall carry on any of the operations authorized to be performed under the terms of any permit during any period of suspension thereof, or after the revocation thereof, or pending a judgment of court upon any application for writ taken to review the decision or order of the final appeal body in the city in suspending or revoking such permit; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the perfor- mance of such operations as may be necessary in connection with a diligent and bona fide effort to cure and remedy the default, noncompliance or violation, for which a suspen- sion of the permit was ordered by the applicable city entity, or such operations as may be required by other laws and .i v U t regulations for the safety of persons and the protection and preservation of property. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.090 Appeals. A. Authority to Appeal. 1. All actions and decisions of the director of communi- ty development, authorized by this chapter, may be appealed to the planning commission or may be appealed by any two planning commissioners unless otherwise specified. All such appeals shall be filed in writing with the planning commission secretary. 2. All actions of the planning commission authorized by this chapter may be appealed to the city council. All such appeals shall be filed in writing with the city clerk. 3. Any person may appeal a decision of the director of community development or planning commission in accordance with the terms of this chapter. 4. The city council shall be the final approval authority for all actions. B. Time Limit to File an Appeal or Request for City Council Review. All requests for appeals must be received by the city no later than the close of business ten (10) business days after the date of the final action by the director of community development or planning commission. C. Fees. Persons filing appeals shall pay all applicable fees in effect at the time of the appeal as established by Resolution of the city council. D. City Council Review of Planning Commission Actions and Decisions by the Director of Community Development. The city council is specifically empowered to review all actions of the planning commission and the director of community development. The city council review of the planning commission and the director of community development actions are subject to the following require- ments: 1. A request for the city council to review the action(s) taken by the planning commission or the director of commu- nity development pursuant to this section shall be valid if filed with the city clerk by any individual city councilmember within ten (10) business days of the date of the action(s) of the commission or the director of com- munity development. 2. The city council shall review the project in the same form as reviewed by the planning commission and the review shall be conducted de novo. 3. A request for the city council to review the action(s) of the planning commission shall be subject to the same type of public action (i.e., action item without public hearing or public hearing item) and public noticing at the city council as at the planning commission or as required for decisions made by the director of community development. 17.44.080 4. An item or item(s), which are called for review, shall be scheduled for the next available city council meeting following completion of the required legal notice provisions as determined by the city clerk. 5. No fee shall be required when an item is called for review by members of the city council or the planning commission in conformance with the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 17.44.100 Effect of change of zoning regulations. See Section 17.52.110. (Ord. 271 § 1 (part), 2001) 383 (Moorpark 7-01) Chapter 17.60 AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLANS, ZONING MAP AND ZONING CODE'S Sections: 17.60.010 Purpose. 17.60.020 Amendments. 17.60.030 Amendment initiation. 17.60.040 Applications required. 17.60.050 Hearing and notice requirements. 17.60.060 Decison authority. 17.60.070 Planning commission action on amendments. 17.60.080 City council action on amendments. 17.60.090 Reapplication. 17.60.100 Findings. • Prior ordinance history: Ord. 189. 17.60.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish procedures for amending the general plan, specific plans, the zoning map or zoning ordinance whenever required by public necessity and general welfare. Adoption and amendment of a general plan, specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance is a legislative act. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.020 Amendments. Amendments to the general plan, specific plan, and zoning map /code may be either textual or map. Textual and mapping changes may be of three types: A. Major Amendments. Major amendments are those which affect changes to goals, policies, or strategies or would alter basic policy directions of the existing general plan or an adopted specific plan. Any amendment that would create significant and substantial impact to levels of public service must be considered as major. B. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments are those which do not create any need for the extension of public services. Some adjustment to service levels may be needed to meet other policy directives, but no new service levels are created. C. Technical Amendments. Technical amendments are changes to data base information, statistical materials, corrections to textual errors and changes which clarify meanings of policy or strategies but do not alter the intent and purpose of the material. 391 17.60.010 With the exception of those amendments necessary to meet housing goals, no mandatory element of the general plan may be amended more than four times in any one calendar year. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.030 Amendment initiation. A. Initiation. Proposals to amend the general plan, any specific plan, the zoning map or this zoning ordinance may be initiated by any of the following methods: 1. Request by the owner(s) or the authorized agent of the owner(s) of the property by filing an application as provided by the community development department, planning division. 2. A change in the general plan, a specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance may be recommended by a resolution of intent from the planning commission to the city council; or may be initiated directly by the city council by resolution of intent. 3. A change in the general plan, a specific plan, zoning map or zoning ordinance may be initiated by request to the city council by the director of community development. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.040 Applications required. A. All applications to amend the general plan, an adopted specific plan, the zoning map or zoning code must be filed with the city on forms and in substantial compliance with administrative procedures provided by the community development department. A fee, as prescribed by city council resolution, shall accompany the application. Formal applications for general plan amendments may only be accepted and considered following successful pre- screening application reviews as established by resolution of the city council. Zoning map amendments have the effect of rezoning property from one zoning district to another. Textual amendments to this zoning ordinance may modify any of the regulations enumerated in Section 65M of the Govern- ment Code of the State of California. Amendments to the provisions of this title may be adopted similar to other ordinances adopted by the city. B. Study of Additional Area The director of community development, upon review of an application or resolution of intention for an amendment to the general plan, any specific plan or zoning map may elect to include a larger area or additional land in the study of the amendment request. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.050 Hearing and notice requirements. The planning commission and city council shall each hold at least one (1) public hearing on any general plan, specific plan or zoning amendment request. The notice CC ATTACHMENT 6 (Stoorpark 7 -01) 17.60.010 and hearing requirements shall be the same as those pre- scribed in Section 17.44.050. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.060 Decision authority. The city council shall be the decision authority for all major and minor general plan amendments and specific plan amendments. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.070 Planning commission action on amendments. Following a public hearing, the planning commission shall make a written recommendation to the city council whether to approve, approve in modified form, or disap- prove any proposed amendment, based upon the findings contained in Section 17.60.100. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation and the relation- ship of the proposed ordinance or amendment to applicable general and specific plans. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.080 City council action on amendments. Following a public hearing, the city council may approve, modify or disapprove any planning commission recommen- dation regarding an amendment request based upon the findings in Section 17.60.100. A modification shall be deemed "previously considered" if the modification of the proposed ordinance or amendment by the city council is based upon the issues and evidence initially heard by the planning commission. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.090 Reapplication. A general plan amendment, specific plan amendment or zoning map change may be denied with prejudice as defined herein, in which event no further application shall be filed affecting all or part of the property for the ensuing eighteen (18) months except as otherwise specified at the time of denial. A zoning ordinance amendment may be denied with prejudice as defined herein, on the grounds that two (2) or more similar applications for substantially the same changes have been denied in the past two (2) years, or that other good cause exists for limiting the filing of applications with respect to the subject property. The city council, upon being presented with good cause, may permit an applicant to apply for a change on the same property within eighteen (18) months. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) 17.60.100 Findings. A. Findings for Amendments. An amendment may be approved only if all the following findings are made, as applicable to the type of development. 1. Findings required for all amendments. (Stoorpark 7 -01) 392 a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation strategies of the general plan. b. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public, health, safety, or welfare of the city; and c. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties. 2. Additional Finding for Zoning Map Amendments. The site is physically suitable (including, but not limited to access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land use/developments. (Ord. 271 § 2 (part), 2001) appropriate to the unit" shall mean one (1) person to a studio unit, two (2) persons to a one (1) bedroom unit, three (3) persons to a two (2) bedroom unit, four (4) persons to a three (3) bedroom unit, and five (5) persons to a four (4) bedroom unit. C. Senior Ownership and Rental Units. Households shall be eligible to purchase or rent a senior unit if they meet the following criteria: a. Where at least fifty percent (50 %) of the total units of a housing development are set aside for senior residents, a person or family shall be eligible if at least one (1) person is a senior resident. b. Consideration will be given to households residing and/or working in Moorpark. (Ord. 189 § 3 (81160, 1994) 395 17.64.050 Chapter 17.68 PUBLIC NOTICE Sections: 17.68.010 Applicability of chapter. 17.68.020 Installation of sign. 17.68.030 Sign information. 17.68.040 Land area of one -half acre or less. 17.68.050 Removal of sign. 17.68.060 Failure to comply with chapter. 17.68.010 Applicability of chapter. The provisions of this chapter apply to all zone changes, special use permits, variances, planned development permits, tentative tract permits, major modifications, specific plans, land divisions, time extensions, all other discretionary land use applications, and appeals of any of the above- described applications. (Ord. 15 § 1(a), 1984) 17.68.020 installation of sign. At least eleven (11) days before the hearing on any of the applications described in Section 17.68.010, the applicant shall install a sign on the subject property consistent with the following provisions: A. The size of the sign shall be thirty -two (32) square feet in area. B. The height of the sign shall not exceed eight (8) feet. C. The sign shall be placed in an area of the property most visible to the public, and not more than five (5) feet from the property line in residential areas, and not more than one (1) foot from the property line in commercial and industrial areas. All approvals of any application of any industrial or commercial property subject to this chapter shall include a condition for placing on the property signs of other property located interior to the subject property from the street. D. The sign shall not be illuminated, and only one (1) sign shall be displayed per street frontage of the subject property. (Ord. 15 § 1(b), 1984) 17.68.030 Sign information. The sign shall include only the following information: A. The heading of the sign shall be essentially as follows: "Notice of public hearing on proposed development Case No. " B. The content of the sign shall describe the type of property (residential, industrial or commercial), including the square footage, number of units, etc. Descriptive words such as "luxurious" or "elegant" shall not be used. CC ATTACHMENT 7 (Mowpork 12.95) 17.68.030 C. The sign shall include the date, time and location of the public hearing, and the telephone numbers of the developer and of city hall. D. Dates shall be changed on the sign to refer to the next planned public hearing. (Ord. 15 § 1(c), 1984) 17.68.040 Land area of one -half acre or less. Where the total area of the land is one -half (1/2) acre or less, the director of community development shall determine if a sign is necessary to provide adequate notice to the public of the nature of the project. If the director of community development determines a sign is necessary, the director of community development shall prescribe a sign sufficient to give adequate notice to the public. The applicant shall, at least eleven (11) days before any hearing, post on the property, in the manner described in subsections C and D of Section 17.68.020, the sign prescribed by the director of community development. (Ord. 15 § 1(d), 1984) 17.68.050 Removal of sign. The sign shall be removed from the property not more than twelve (12) days after the final action by the city on the land use application. (Ord. 15 § 1(e), 1984) 17.68.060 Failure to comply with chapter. Failure to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall not affect the jurisdiction of any public body deciding any application. (Ord. 15 § 1(f), 1984) (Moorpark 12 -98) 396 Chapter 17.72 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY ZONE (SP -D) Sections: 17.72.010 Purpose. 17.72.020 Terms and definitions. 17.72.030 General provisions. 17.72.040 Review procedures. 17.72.050 Design and landscape guidelines. 17.72.060 Single - family residential (R -1). 17.72.070 Two - family residential (R -2). 17.72.080 Residential planned development— (R -PD). 17.72.090 Office- -(C -O). 17.72.100 Old town commercial (C -OT). 17.72.110 Neighborhood commercial (C -1). 17.72.120 Commercial planned development (C -PD). 17.72.130 Institutional (I). 17.72.140 Industrial Park/Light Industrial (M -1). 17.72.150 Lot consolidation incentive program. 17.72.010 Purpose. The development standards and design guidelines for downtown Moorpark are intended to reinforce building character and establish design criteria for all new buildings, renovated buildings, and remodels. (Ord. 247 § 1 (part), 1998) 17.72.020 Terms and definitions. Words and terms used within the downtown specific plan and overlay zone shall have the same meaning and definition as given within the Moorpark municipal code, including Chapter 17, zoning ordinance and the city general plan. (Ord. 247 § 1 (part), 1998) 17.72.030 General provisions. The provisions of the downtown specific plan overlay zone apply to properties in the downtown specific plan area and supplement the other regulations of the zoning ordinance. The specific plan development standards and design guidelines are consistent with, and further, the city zoning ordinance. In such cases where the specific plan development standards and zoning code standards conflict, the specific plan development standards shall apply. (Ord. 247 § 1 (part), 1998) ITEM 8.7D ' - -j A A, 1 ,'z•'A MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL° AGENDA REPORT�� 3Q TO: Honorable City Council _h%,4 .,.o FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Work �C Prepared By: Paul Porter, Principal Planner �S DATE: July 31, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Condition of Approval for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2002 -01 (GreeneWay) Related to Left -Turns at the Spring Road Driveway, on the Initiation of City Council (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0- 180-09) BACKGROUND Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 2002 -01, located at the northeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road, on the application of GreeneWay Development, Inc., was approved by the City Council on June 4, 2003. The project consists of three (3) single -story commercial buildings containing a total of 21,903 square feet, within an existing neighborhood retail center, which currently contains a McDonalds restaurant, Blockbuster Video, and Starbuck's Coffee store. One of the Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 2003 -2091 (Special Condition No. 11, Attachment 2) required the applicant to post a "No Left Turn" sign at the Spring Road driveway and to redesign this driveway to preclude left turns out of the project site. On June 18, 2003, the City Council voted to reconsider this condition.. The permitting of left turn egress at this driveway only during non -peak hours was offered as an option for consideration. Although left turns out of the Spring Road driveway would be prohibited by Condition No. 11, the motion for approval of the project on June 4, 2003, specifically allowed for southbound left turn ingress from Spring Road. The design options for the shopping center driveway and the left -turn lanes and future median on Spring Road are affected by both driveway ingress and egress, therefore, \ \mor pr? sery \City Share \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 GreeneWay \Agenda reports \cc 03082C.doc Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 both are addressed in this report. Attachment 1 is an aerial photograph of the site showing the existing driveway and street configuration. Attachment 3 shows the turn restrictions under Special Condition No. 11 as approved by the City Council. DISCUSSION The permitting of left turns at the Spring Road driveway raises two issues discussed below: traffic circulation and traffic safety. In addition, the Public Works Department evaluated four alternative designs to accommodate left -turn movements. Traffic Circulation: The circulation component that would be most impacted by left turns to and from the center at Spring Road is the southbound left turn lane, where traffic waiting for the signal often queues past the center's driveway location, located about 220 feet from the intersection. Currently, more than 340 vehicles make left turns from Spring Road to New Los Angeles Avenue during the A.M. Peak Hour (generally between 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M.). A Traffic Impact Study prepared for this project by Linscott, Law and Greenspan projects this number to increase to 474 left turns by the year 2010. In order to accommodate this traffic volume, the Public Works Department is planning a widening of Spring Road to include a raised median and two (2) southbound left -turn lanes on to New Los Angeles Avenue. The installation of this double left -turn lane is in response to the need to accommodate the relatively high number of staged vehicles (vehicles waiting to turn left). The conceptual design was approved by the City Council in 1998 and is discussed in further detail below in the "Analysis of Alternative Designs" section. The intersection is currently operating at Level of Service "D ", below the City standard of Level of Service "C ". Without the two left turn lanes and other improvements planned on both Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road, this intersection is projected to operate at Level of Service "F" during the A.M. peak hour by the year 2010, exceeding its design capacity. Even with all the planned improvements, the intersection is still projected to only operate at Level of Service "D" during the A.M. peak hour. A discussion with Bruce Chow, the traffic engineer who prepared the report for Linscott, Law and Greenspan, indicated that non peak - hour conditions at the intersection would typically be Level of Service "C" or better. Allowing left turn ingress and egress to and from the shopping center along Spring Road during non -peak traffic hours could impede S:\Cemmunity Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 Greeneway \Agenda reports \cc C30820.doc , Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 3 the flow of traffic, particularly when double left -turn lanes are installed. Vehicles making left turns from the shopping center onto Spring Road could potentially block traffic traveling north on Spring Road if the queuing at the turn lanes extends beyond the driveway, as is currently common, even during non -peak hours. Vehicles queuing in the left hand turn lanes waiting to turn left onto New Los Angeles Avenue could also be impeded by vehicles waiting to turn left into the shopping center. Interruption in the traffic flow will serve to further reduce the efficiency of the traffic flow at the intersection. Safety: The City Engineer has indicated that allowing left turn ingress and egress to and from the site at the Spring Road curb -cut during non - peak hours will both create an enforcement issue and confuse drivers. This will produce a hazardous situation at this intersection that will increase with time due to the close proximity of the driveway on Spring Road to the New Los Angeles Avenue /Spring Road intersection (approximately 220 feet). It is safer for motorists to turn right and make a U -turn at Roberts Avenue. The Condition of Approval on the GreeneWay project prohibiting left turn egress onto Spring Road is more permissive than the current Condition of Approval (Condition No. 98) imposed on Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 92 -2 (McDonald's Corporation), which prohibits both left turn ingress and egress at Spring Road. Analysis of Alternative Designs: Design Diagrams: Attached are diagrams (Attachments 5 through 9) depicting alternative design options for the future Spring Road median and traffic stripping, in the vicinity of the shopping center driveway. Those diagrams are generally described as follows: • Option 1 (Attachment 4) shows the approved conceptual design for the Spring Road Widening Project, including a raised median preventing left -turn ingress and egress turning movements at the shopping center driveway. • Option 2 (Attachment 5) shows a break in the median to allow left -turn ingress movements into the shopping center driveway. The design intent for this option would rely on signing and other physical improvements to prohibit left -turn egress movements at the driveway. This plan would permit the ingress left -turn movement approved for CPD 2002 -01 on June 4, 2003. This design option was not recommended by the Spring Road project design engineer or the City Engineer, nor S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 G:eeneWay \Agenda reports \cc 030820.doc C �, Fl e_t " 'J ..... -1 Ow Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 4 was it approved by the City Council in its 1998 approval of the Spring Road widening conceptual design for the following reasons: 1) it is anticipated that there will be traffic staging conflicts between ingress left- turners and staged traffic waiting to turn left onto New Los Angeles Avenue; and 2) the break in the median does not physically prevent left -turn egress from the shopping center driveway. • Option 3 (Attachment 6) shows a shortened double left -turn lane for New Los Angeles Avenue in order to provide for a "separate" left -turn pocket for the left -turn ingress traffic into the shopping center driveway. This plan would permit the ingress left -turn movement approved for CPD 2002 -01 on June 4, 2003. This plan reduces the length of the double left -turn lane from 250' to 1501, thus reducing the staging capability from twenty (20) cars to twelve (12). The impact of shortening the double -left turn lane is discussed below. It is anticipated that the shorter double left -turn lane will cause staging to occur in the number one southbound lane, which could impede access to the left -turn pocket for the driveway ingress traffic. The impact of staged vehicles in the number one lane is also discussed below. • Option 4 (Attachment 7) shows an even shorter double -left- turn lane for New Los Angeles Avenue to provide for a free - flow of ingress and egress left -turn traffic at the shopping center driveway. This plan permits both left -turn ingress and egress movements at the driveway. It also reduces the length of the double left -turn lane from 250' to 100', thus reducing the staging capability from twenty (20) cars to eight (8). The impact of shortening the double -left turn lane is discussed below. It is anticipated that the shorter double left -turn lane will cause staging to occur in the number one southbound lane, which could impede access to the left -turn pocket for the shopping center driveway ingress traffic. The impact of staged vehicles in the number one lane is discussed below. This design option is not recommended or approved by the Spring Road project design engineer, or the City Engineer, for the following reasons: 1) it is anticipated that there will be traffic conflicts between left- turners from the driveway and left- turners for New Los Angeles Avenue staged in the number one southbound lane; and S: \Corununity Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 G:eeneWay \Agenda reports \cc 030820.doc Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 5 2) it is anticipated that there will be visibility conflicts between exiting left -turn and right -turn traffic staged in the driveway. • Option 5 (Attachment 8) allows for left -turn egress traffic movements from the shopping center driveway to cross the double left -turn lanes. This plan permits both left -turn ingress and egress movements at the driveway. This design option is not recommended by the Spring Road project design engineer or the City Engineer, for the following reasons: 1) it is anticipated that there will be traffic staging conflicts between left- turners at the driveway and left- turners for New Los Angeles Avenue; and 2) it is also anticipated that traffic flow conflicts will arise between left -turn egress traffic from the driveway and vehicles using the double left -turn lanes. Current and Projected Traffic Volumes: Spring Road currently handles 13,000 cars per day, with a 2007 projection of 23,000 cars per day. Much of this increase is anticipated as a result of the future connection of Spring Road to Walnut Canyon Road, along with future development anticipated in the northern portion of the city. It is the view of staff that the original design [Option 11 handles these traffic volumes better than the other design options discussed herein. Channelization: The primary purpose of constructing raised medians is to improve traffic safety by channelizing traffic and eliminating points of conflict related to left -turn traffic movements. Option 1 implements this objective by installing a raised median at the shopping center driveway. If installed, egress traffic from the driveway wishing to travel south, would be required to make a "U- turn" at Roberts Avenue. The other design options discussed herein provide for a break in the median at the shopping center driveway. Those designs would allow left -turn conflicts at this location to continue. Those design options which allow for both left -turn ingress and egress movements, increase the number of those traffic conflicts and increases the complexity of cross - traffic turning movements at this location. Currently, left -turn egress movements from the shopping center driveway during the morning peak hours cause much confusion and congestion. Design Option 1 would eliminate those problems. Double Left -Turn Lane: Option 1 provides for a double left -turn lane at New Los Angeles Avenue which is two hundred and fifty feet S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 Greer:eWay \Agenda reports \cc 030820.doc Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 6 (2501) long and accommodates twenty (20) vehicles. This design was prepared based on traffic counts demonstrating the need to provide for the staging of this number of left -turn vehicles. Some of the other design options discussed herein call for a reduced length for the double left -turn lane which will diminish the Level of Service (LOS] for the intersection by reducing the number of "double - stacked" vehicles turning left on to New Los Angeles Avenue. Reduced LOS equates to increase traffic congestion. Staging in the Number One Lane: It should be noted that the shortened double left -turn lanes shown on Options 3 and 4 will increase the incidence of left -turn vehicles staged in the number one southbound lane. These staged vehicles will block access to the left -turn lane for ingress traffic to the shopping center driveway, and also block left -turn egress traffic coming from the driveway. These obstructions could even cause a "blocked" left - turner from the shopping center driveway to block northbound traffic on Spring Road. A worst -case scenario would be a condition which could lead to "gridlock" affecting traffic on New Los Angeles Avenue. Although a "KEEP CLEAR" stencil could be installed in the southbound number one lane to help prevent this type of blockage to traffic flow, experience has shown that such markings are not very effective. Also, even if drivers observed the stencil, staged traffic south of the stencil (at a RED light) would impede the advancement of left -turn egress traffic, at times then blocking northbound traffic. On -Site Congestion: The above described congestion on Spring Road could lead to congestion on -site. Presently this is a common occurrence as vehicles waiting for an opening to turn left onto Spring Road, block and prevent right -turn traffic from exiting the Center. Although future improvement may include two (2) exit lanes, a design which allows left -turn egress (Options 4 & 5) is expected to continue to cause on -site congestion for traffic exiting the center at the driveway. Left -Turn Lane Cross Traffic: It is not a common design practice to provide for or encourage cross - traffic across a double- left -turn lane, as shown by Option 5 (Attachment 8). The installation of a double left -turn lane is in response to the need to accommodate a relatively high number of staged vehicles. The anticipated high number of staged vehicles is in conflict with and would potentially block egress left -turn traffic from the shopping center driveway. This design option is not recommended by staff, the Spring Road project design engineer or the City Engineer. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 Greeneway \Agenda reports \cc 030820.doc Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 7 Summary of Alternative Design Analysis: • As was stated by staff on June 4, 2003, the preferred option recommend by staff was Option 1. This design option implements the original Conditions of Approval for the McDonald's project by prohibiting left -turn ingress and egress traffic movements from the shopping center driveway. • The preferred design option for accommodating left -turn ingress at the shopping center driveway (per approval of CPD 2002 -01 on June 4, 2003) is Option 3. Although this option does not provide sufficient staging for left- turners at New Los Angeles Avenue, it does a better job than Option 2 of handling or preventing cross - traffic conflicts. • Should the City Council direct that left -turn egress traffic also be permitted at the shopping center driveway, it is recommended that Option 4 be selected. Although this Option also does not provide sufficient staging for left - turners at New Los Angeles Avenue, it does a better job than Option 5 of handling or preventing cross - traffic conflicts. • Should the City Council choose any alternative other than Option 1, the intersection could be changed at any time based upon actual field conditions (i.e., long waits for left turn movements, impacts to through traffic and /or the number of accidents). STAFF RECOI&ZNDATION Affirm the Conditions of Approval that were adopted on June 4, 2003, utilizing Design Option 3. Should the City Council wish to amend Special Condition of Approval No. 11 related to the left turn movements, direction could be given to the Community Development Director to process a Permit Adjustment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Photo of 2. Special Conditic 3. Conceptual Plan 4. Option 1 Design 5. Option 2 Design 6. Option 3 Design 7. Option 4 Design 8. Option 5 Design Project Site )n of Approval No. 11 of CPD Permit No. 2002 -01 of Spring Road as Conditioned Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative S: \Cocimunity Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2002 \01 GreeneWay \Agenda reports \cc 030820.doc Resolution No. 2003 -2091 11. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of the first building the Applicant shall install a "No Left Turn" sign at the Spring Road curb -cut and redesign the existing driveway to preclude left -hand turns onto Spring Road. The design is subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. CC ATTACHMENT 2 L �y. B c D k 1 Greeneway Site ` s 4 7F l ti ______________ -------- ________-------------- ___ 1 SprinLy Road 1 Conceptual Plan showing Reconfiguration of Spring Road as Conditioned u CC ATTACHMENT 3 1 1 p r E CD CD cn c C CD Spring RtOod %Loa Anrjelr•; ^,yr, Iritorse< t,Gn D dawn By Planning Division Data 4+ 4 r 0 0 D Z z H C; s•� v 00 N CD CA a Cs! Cs! N (�J C.� J CsJ ENKE t)IKE — L — — — — — — SP-RI N-G ROAD — — — — — — — — — — - 0 • 1 r n n D y �R C rTl z H C; s•� v 00 N CD CA a Cs! Cs! N (�J C.� J CsJ ENKE t)IKE — L — — — — — — SP-RI N-G ROAD — — — — — — — — — — - 0 I' i Staging I % Conflict Area 1 I O -- �, (r n 1 No Left Egress [Signs Only] I ! y L I I i r �.1 t� i ., o� - N I BIKE � r a.! � ' ..�1i�as � � v. ��� � �� (t- f-- ^•- _._- -ai�n� : b,1j � �� <P, 1 % K7d. Landscaped Median No Left Egress ! z y Cn b o• C� l� ' 1 . j r O- - - ��Kr BIKE ?IKE �. SP-RIN-G R0 A0 z 1900 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - _ r. 'tr' :%: •.E��•Yi •i; 'l r: i,' .%��,I ,r. _ �. ti'4r` L`'i'iY n L Z y Landscaped Median � y P t� Left Ingress -- 0 & Egress Allowed I [Design Option 1 ] , z y i •� J �.j , U Cross Traffic I Conflict Area � j \� /• I i � ! 'r 4- At- 0 ' � � // a..a�a it '_ ' __ T 1-�i� _- y.h• YY'rrlr� •� -._ i y I 1 !C n j ri Left Ingress & Egress Allowed [Design Option 21 W o• z i H I OD i C` Left Ingress & Egress Allowed [Design Option 21 W o• ITEM Q • A MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL *Acy k m.1�re-..., ZaJa ..;_ - -- AGENDA REPORT C;ha., TO: Honorable City Council VI e��� hua.,.0 4--W- FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk IL?: �/►�..f.�. DATE: July 25, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider Teen Council Appointments BACKGROUND As of June 30, 2003, the appointment period for the Teen Council expired. The application period to submit applications closed on May 30, 2003. Twenty -one (21) applications for the Teen Council were received from the following individuals: MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL Ninth Grade Seventh Grade Marisa Bloch Naseem Keyhani Zahabiya Chithiwala* Sannaz Keyhani* Eighth Grade Jon Lamberson Aryan Aziz Paul Jafar Tenth Grade Hilary Pemberton Megan Beardsley Brittany Best* Brianna Corzine Eleventh Grade Taylor Fernandez Melissa Macias Shauna Marsh* Sergio Pacheco Shannon Pflaumer* Greg Priebe* Nick Semnani* Twelfth Grade Melanie Cowgill Amber Lorenzen Elizabeth Saidkhanian* * Served on Teen Council from 9/2002- 6/2003 Honorable City Council Teen Council Appointments August 20, 2003, Regular Meeting Page 2 The Teen Council applications were provided to the Council under separate cover. DISCUSSION The Teen Council appointment process is included in the City Council Policies Resolution No. 2002 -2040. Teen Council Membership and organization requirements are included in Resolution No. 2002- 2040 as follows: All appointments to the Teen Council shall be made by the Mayor of the City of Moorpark, with approval of the City Council, consistent with the adopted Council policy on procedure for appointments (Policy 5). The Teen Council shall consist of no less than seven (7) and no more than eleven (11) members, with a goal of having a minimum of one (1) representative from each grade level from 7th grade to 12th grade. All representatives must be City of Moorpark residents and must be enrolled in school. Special attention should be given to insure that all middle schools and high schools in Moorpark have some representation on the Teen Council. Representatives would typically be limited to not serving more than a total of three years on the Teen Council to allow more teens the opportunity to serve as a Teen Council representative. Of the 21 applicants listed on Page 1 of this report, eight served on the Teen Council in 2002 -2003. Shannon Pflaumer and Greg Priebe have served the longest, having been appointed in October 2000, and are not eligible for reappointment this year based on the three - year limitation in the Council's adopted Teen Council policy. The Council's adopted procedure for appointments (Policy 5 in Resolution No. 2002 -2040) is as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. ,-X .. --T Honorable City Council Teen Council Appointments August 20, 2003, Regular Meeting Page 2 C. The Mayor shall then make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECOZOONDATION Make a minimum of seven and a maximum of eleven appointments to the Teen Council for a one -year term to end on June 30, 2004. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM q - $- TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk, DATE: July 25, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider Appointment of Two City Representatives to the Ventura County Area Housing Authority (AHA) BACKGROUND Two Commissioners are appointed by each of seven (7) local jurisdictions (including the city of Moorpark) who are a party to Memorandum of Understanding Agreement under Article 31 of the State Constitution which created the Area Housing Authority of the County of Ventura (AHA) . Commissioners serve a four (4) year term, and according to State law, remain a Commissioner until replaced or reappointed. Commissioners receive a $50.00 stipend for each Board meeting they attend and an additional $50.00 for each Committee meeting they attend, with a maximum payment of $200.00 a month. Commissioners are paid mileage. At the City Council's meeting on February 5, 2003, the Council extended the term of the City's current appointees, Jay Flashner and Herbert Morrison, to August 31, 2003. The application period to fill the two upcoming vacancies closed on June 30, 2003. Applications were received from the following individuals: Morrie Abramson Anthony Bellasalma Jay Flashner Herbert Morrison Natalie Panossian (Copies of the applications were provided under separate cover.) Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 2 The Council's adopted procedure for appointments (Policy 5 in Resolution No. 2002 -2040) is as follows: A. The Mayor shall solicit suggested nominees from members of the Council. B. Prior to making a motion for appointment, the Mayor shall announce the names of all persons he /she intends to nominate, and in the order to be nominated, for a board, commission, or committee. C. The Mayor shall then make a motion putting forth each individual name to be approved for appointment. D. A second shall be required. E. The Council shall vote on each appointment individually. STAFF RECOZOONDATION Appoint two City representatives to the Ventura County AHA for a four -year term ending August 31, 2007. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ITEM °I • c• MOORPARK CITY COUNCILImnG �d AGENDA REPORT �, u 14 The Honorable City Council (5-0) By: W >�,�.,.. Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works August 4, 2003 (Council Meeting 8- 20 -03) Cost Reduction Alternatives for the Corporation Yard Project A. Backaround In June of this year the City Council approved the preliminary layout for the new Corporation Yard [Exhibits 1 & 2], but directed staff to confer with the project architect to identify possible cost reduction measures prior to proceeding with the final conceptual design. The cost of the four options initially suggested by the architect, are summarized as follows: With Covered Without Covered Building Type Parking ($) Parking ($) Concrete Masonry 3,836,420 3,406,663 Pre -Fab Steel Building 3,563,178 3,133,421 B. Maior Cost Reduction Measures The architect has identified a number of design changes which would generate significant cost savings. These changes are listed in prior order (as viewed by staff) as follows: Item Delete Reduced Cost Savings ($) A. Cover for Outside Storage B. Wrought Iron changed to chain link C. Electrical Charging Station D. LNG Fueling Station E. Skylights F. Reduce Paved Area G. Covered Parking Area at Building H. Reduce Building Footprint I. Refuse Handling Facility Total CorpYard costs 0208 X 258,000 X 74,000 X 35,000 X 27,000 X 20,000 X 109,000 X 183,000 X 80,000 X 120,000 ✓ �./ v Y � � -r V Corporation Yard Costs August 4, 2003 Page 2 The location of the above listed facilities is shown on the diagram attached as Exhibit 3. The major cost cutting options listed above are described in more detail below, along with comments and recommendations. A. Delete Cover for Outside Storage [$258,000]: 1. Action: Delete the proposed covers for the outside storage and parking areas along the north and the west fence lines. 2. Effect: This change would delete protective improvements designed to increase the useable life of equipment and materials. 3. Recommendation: Delete from the project scope (or possibly show as an Add Alternate). B. Fencing [$74,000]: 1. Action: Replace wrought iron fencing with chain link along the perimeter of the facility, except the westerly entry area where wrought iron would remain. 2. Effect: This change would only slightly diminish the aesthetic presentation of the facility, as seen from adjacent properties. The adjacent Caltrans facility uses chain link fencing. 3. Recommendation: Delete from the project scope. C. Delete Electrical Charging Station [$35,000]: 1. Action: Delete this facility from the plan. 2. Effect: This action would impede the City's ability to utilize low- emission, fuel- efficient vehicles in the future. 3. Recommendation: This feature can be funded from Traffic System Management (TSM) Funds. Do not delete this facility. D. Delete LNG Fueling Station [$27,000]: 1. Action: Delete this facility from the plan. 2. Effect: This action would impede the City's ability to utilize low - emission, fuel - efficient vehicles in the future. 3. Recommendation: This feature can be funded from Traffic System Management (TSM) Funds. Do not delete this facility. E. Delete Skylights [$20,000]: 1. Action: Delete this component of the building design from the plans. 2. Effect: Such an action would eliminate possible electrical energy cost savings which could be derived from the use of skylights. 3. Recommendation: Do not delete skylights. CorpYard costs 0208 .. v >v........ Corporation Yard Costs August 4, 2003 Page 3 F. Reduce Paved Area [$154,000]: 1. Action: The draft concept plan called for paving the entire site except for the expansion area at the east end of the property. The action would be to limit the pavement to only the shaded area shown on Exhibit 4. If this change were to be implemented, the surface for the area north of the "shaded" area [approximately 32,000 sq. ft.] would be left in a gravel or base material. 2. Effect: Such an action would diminish the usability of the facility, while increasing the long -term maintenance costs. An unpaved surface is less "user- friendly" and durable than an asphalt surface. 3. Recommendation: Do not delete implement this change. G. Delete Covered Parking Area [$200,000]: 1. Action: Revise the building roof structure to delete the roof for covered parking along the north side of the building. 2. Effect: Such an action would not only delete the shelter for vehicles and storage in this area (increasing wear and tear), but also eliminate the sheltered work area for re- stocking trucks and related activities. Such a change would also encourage the continued use of storage bins for primary work activities and for the storage of supply and materials. 3. Recommendation: Do not delete implement this change. H. Reduce Building Footprint [$80,000]: 1. Action: Reduce the building foot print 800 sf, generally as follows: > Conference Room: reduced 200 sf > Quad Office: reduced 200 sf > Quad Office: reduced 400 sf 800 sf 2. Effect: Such an action would reduce the useable building area. 3. Recommendation: Do not delete implement this change. I. Delete Refuse Handling Facility [$120,000]: 1. Action: Delete this facility. 2. Effect: By lowering the bins and raising th 3. areas, the planned design will enable City contractors to easily and efficiently dump refuse into forty (40) cubic yard bins for recycled materials, without the need for doub l or the use of heavy equipment. An action to facility would require the continuation of t practice of "double" handling, requiring the manpower and equipment costs related thereto. e "dumping" crews and debris and refuse and e handling delete this he current additional Recommendation: Do not delete implement this change. r CorpYard costs 0208 r' Fir 'w Corporation Yard Costs August 4, 2003 Page 4 C. Other Minor Chancres Certain other design changes were identified by the architect, which have a lesser cost savings significance. Those possible design changes are listed as follows: Item Delete Reduced Cost Savings ($) 1. Chain link instead of roll -up doors x 10,400 2. Landscape / Hardscape x 540 3. Monument Sign x 4,000 4. Shower x 3,500 5. Change north wall to chain link x 21,000 Total 39,440 It is not recommended that any of these changes be implemented. D. Fiscal Impact 1. Total Project Cost Estimate: The estimated cost range for the project previously presented to the City Council is summarized as follows: Note: This amount does not include any revenues which might be derived from the sale of Parcel "C ", the approximately one -half (',�) acre lot at the west end of the site. 2. FY 2003104 Budget: The current FY 03/04 Budget for the project is as follows: High End Low End Description Amount ($) Amount ($) Design 210,000 210,000 Environmental Document 25,000 25,000 Land Acquisition 920,792 920,792 Construction 3,840,000 2,518,421 Inspection 250,000 200,000 Total 5,245,792 3,874,213 Note: This amount does not include any revenues which might be derived from the sale of Parcel "C ", the approximately one -half (',�) acre lot at the west end of the site. 2. FY 2003104 Budget: The current FY 03/04 Budget for the project is as follows: DO'�F%r '^ CorpYard costs -0208 v, �,�,� Estimated FY 03/04 Total Description Prior Years ($) Budget ($) Project ($) Design 50,000 229,208 279,208 Land Acquisition 920,792 0 920,792 Construction 2,500,000 2,500,000 Inspection 200,000 200,000 Total 970,792 2,929,208 3,900,000 DO'�F%r '^ CorpYard costs -0208 v, �,�,� Corporation Yard Costs August 4, 2003 Page 5 3. Funding: The approach taken in funding the subject project is summarized as follows: Component Design Land Acquisition Construction Inspection Percent Endowment Gas Tax Fund 2800 Fund 2605 Total 70 30 100 70 30 100 85 15 100 85 15 100 4. Budget Amendment: If necessary, a budget amendment will be prepared to fully fund the estimated cost of the scope of the project approved by the City Council. E. Photovoltaics In response to interest expressed by the City regarding this matter, the architect is investigating the cost /benefit of providing for the installation of photovoltaic systems at this facility. A report on this option will be provided to the City Council at a later date. F. Summary / Conclusions It is the view of staff that the original recommended design, calling for the construction of a masonry building, be approved with the deletion of Items A (perimeter cover) and B (wrought iron fencing east of the entry) above. The revised construction cost with these changes is noted as follows: Description Amount ($) Original Construction Cost Estimate 3,836,420 Less: A. Perimeter Cover [ *Add Alternate] (258,000) Less: B. Wrought Iron Fencing East of Entry Area (74,000) 3,504,420 As noted above, it is recommended that this be included in the project design and the bid documents as an `'ADD ALTERNATE ". If it is at the time of award of contract, that the Perimeter Cover can be constructed, the ADD ALTERNATE can be added to the scope and cost of the construction project. With regard to the other items listed in Section B of this report [Items C thru I] , it is the view of staff that the long -term costs, in terms of efficiency, equipment life - cycle, usability and capability, exceed the cost - savings which would be generated in the short -term. CorpYard costs 0208 `� ^`"� 4 Corporation Yard Costs August 4, 2003 Page 6 G. Schedule It is anticipated that the Conceptual Design (Phase 2) and the Final Design (Phase 3) will be completed in approximately eight (8) months. During that period, staff will have an environmental document prepared, select a Construction Management firm and complete the required Bidder Pre - Qualification process. Construction is planned to commence in July 2004. STAFF RECObMNDATIONS Approve the preliminary design for Construction Option `A' (masonry construction with covered parking), with the deletion of Change Item B [portion of wrought iron fencing] and the inclusion of Change Item A [cover for perimeter parking / storage areas] as a Bid Add Alternate. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4: Site Plan Floor Plan Location of Suggested Changes Site Plan [Revised Paved Area] CorpYard costs 0208 T- t -i !+ E -1 t i I _ - l 1! 1 i .l I. i l— l I! I i I I i a.F �, y A _- r I!_II` III�LII�!IIII�II� }1111111 IlI'4 IIl1I.1 II °Ai�aal�cs I I1IiI�II_II ! I r l i I 1 1 1 4 1 1 I i l r�-T 1 1 1 1 1 l i� 1 f 1 1 1 1 I I L __. — _ —_. iVf__ _ _ _ _ _ _ L.--r _ _ J'�_. -. r{ _ r'! - _. ._ Win! - -..— -__ _. -. TRV-,C CONTM. DCVC� YNGR AA* ( STWW TRAY PUN,C "KS ! ALL .tRJNM CPWL SW7 CIAMUTA'CJ CWNX I N wk -• 1 •/ MhMf[WNCL aiYY1M'�'•F_Q': S '. Vf Kt4s / ASP'Mlt �COMtAWVt main= o. Aon�s I I ' ou ooat�0 � wn 4OR1fZ ARFAS STORAGE U uu u H H 1 aP � CWKMW V.Mms swfxx /.� LOT PORTION 'C v I-- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- PARNANECTOR AREA TO BE SOLO - mMrRa e OR LEASED (NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT) 0.58 ACRE AWA - — -- i Eno+ MOU ELE04M WWI 0WONG STAIN!{ LOT PORTION "V CORPORATE YARD 2.16 ACRES irf KiAo11M i1UETY - - -. -t t 0 . • 1Ai15t'.19RG' eotec�ro�SaE tRS1GN Acass I I I I I I CALTRAN'S YARD + a A. I I I E E111W= EMPLOYEE PAROC A VWM RWIMC OWP nta OR TANK - " LMR - E /tMw CAS I ' PuEUMG AREA t I - I I 1. -J uww I jL. 801 Non0 ♦-. n i BIN NaUP *r�—� . RECR]ARE f it lRlLAG � I I 1 ,i� 1 sw LOWER g BIM Nl a =_ utc v nfr LOT PORTION'S" FUTURE do ACCESSORY — — USE AREA 1.06 ACRES 1 SU&{:MIRACION SU NG Gf0 z rn. Buss PAIMC >, tAIOSGWE/lilCE R0.DL nMB I 1 l OUT OF M "CU 3 d II N I SITE AREA = 4.13 ACRES CORPORATE YARD =2.16 ACRES AREA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION = 1.06 ACRES s�° ro l .i .I 1 t— i 7 _ -... ___________ ___ __ _____________ _______ ______ ________________________ ______ S � e a o 0 -- o - -- -� _..._. 1 , I f ' I 1 C ;� 4 It�n1° ,•.vr ��� ain �n � I \- wsl�� _ oun I i a •u" n I I i � o.. L — f.n oa:�onna i Jn`i.^^ •w. m� I i ��. , I I '� w., f•mn ` MTY 1) ENCI CStC ARIA: 9,200 S.F. CCVFR7.11 WORK & PARKING AREA: 4920 S. CIA ' arvNa f 3 < I I � FLOOR PLAN — _ -- — -- — -- — -- - NORTH G 5 10 17 JO 2 M ,. !-,-) 'Irr`1��I�I irr��r *7 VIII.. T jl I- El.illi.iiir1.L _ il_r. Intl -t� I i L I�t rr�, rrr Ir I:I ;rr ,,+ .as --- - -- -�r.r __ -rr _ ..r r: -i_ _fin {. - -'- - -' -- "71ACTC :A7i7f701 �EVCE/ YaOR ASR'Al7 . -5767Y IUW "iftc wOricS ! A:.:al%w .G-v 1 S" /cgkm"TJ C;�PP( _ - - I —_ . MA �. .. .- _ �_ �-�� gEla4 + L 1Ww'i w�Ct �wvV.+Y Kr•CLS_ M1.C.S5 I A5.'�x: 1 ( .- .. _ _ //1 COr7A•V- -, •'ter--{ -^/. �' T7'TS'7n/71- !E�TLi'T �_'�--`�f�� -L J � ' >ErCAL � STR SWEEPER 1 NL7OP MIL V w LYIK /• Sw LA10E9 l I I I II I I i I n L� i•3 CALTRAN'S YARD 1 1 l 1 1 1N Mw Tmjm 02 S-OP LOWER a `I M E � I N I SITE AREA = 4.13 ACRES m CORPORATE YARD =2.16 ACRES AREA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION = 1.06 ACRES i G �•1 L"I I I I I I � f I I � I �1 I �I I 1 1 l 1 1 1N Mw Tmjm 02 S-OP LOWER a `I M E � I N I SITE AREA = 4.13 ACRES m CORPORATE YARD =2.16 ACRES AREA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION = 1.06 ACRES i G �•1 L"I �1 I �I I I r WlflAl) . _��� BX R 00, ) IOtIY i IC� rr_ IAHU i I I ttR6E BM I anyn \ I 1 1 l 1 1 1N Mw Tmjm 02 S-OP LOWER a `I M E � I N I SITE AREA = 4.13 ACRES m CORPORATE YARD =2.16 ACRES AREA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION = 1.06 ACRES i G �•1 L"I PARTIAL SITE PLAN. MODIFIED PER REDUCED COST ESIMATE -®r, PARTIAL SITE PLAN. MODIFIED PER REDUCED COST ESIMATE ti_ ., ORT, q A ITEM 10. A. S o)MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California May 1, 2002 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on May 1, 2002, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:54 p.m. 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Tony Amatangelo, Life Spring Community Church, gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Millhouse led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager, Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Mary Lindley, Director of Community Services; Dana Shigley, Director of Administrative Services; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert Le May, Sheriff's Department; Dave Bobardt, Planning Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development Director /Assistant to the City Manager /City Clerk; and LaDell VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Proclamation Acknowledging the Month of May as Veteran's Appreciation Month. Mayor Hunter read the Proclamation and presented it to Councilmember Wozniak on behalf of all Veterans in Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 May 1, 2002 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there is one public speaker who wishes to provide an informational handout to the Council. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to waive Rules of Procedure and receive the late information from Ms. Hollister. Cindy Hollister, a Moorpark resident, addressed the Council in regard to correspondence received from the City granting a 30 -day extension for complying with the Municipal Code in locating a travel trailer on her property. She stated that there is confusion on her part as to what plans she must submit to the City in order to comply with the necessary permits associated with her request and whether or not her item should be placed on a future City Council agenda for resolution. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that as a structure, the mobile home is required to have a Zone Clearance and a Building Permit. Ms. Traffenstedt suggested that staff meet with Ms. Hollister to clarify the procedure. Mr. Kueny stated that after meeting with staff and confirming the requirements, if Ms. Hollister is still not satisfied, she could request that her item be placed on the City Council agenda. He also stated that staff will not be requiring anything that is not consistent with Council's previous direction regarding her situation and the Municipal Code. Ms. Hollister agreed to meet with staff as recommended. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to convene a meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7:20 p.m. The City Council reconvened at 7 :25 p.m. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. e n W-- „-. A Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 May 1, 2002 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Mikos, an Advisory Committee Member on the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Board, announced that the city of Moorpark had received a compliment during a recent meeting of the Conservancy Board from a consultant who had worked with the City and found the interaction to be very positive. Councilmember Mikos stated that she and Ken Gilbert attended a Town Hall meeting at Simi Valley City Hall on Saturday, April 27th, hosted by Assemblyman Keith Richmond, M.D., where wastewater treatment and chloride TMDL's were discussed. Mayor Hunter announced upcoming City sponsored teen events. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1, An Amendment to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use Regulations and Minor Modification No. 4 to Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -1), Regarding Lighting Standards, on the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. Staff Recommendation:l) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss issues identified in the agenda report, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1967, approving Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan, subject to conditions of approval; and 3) Introduce Ordinance No. 280 for first reading, amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195. Mr. Bobardt gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Bobardt stated that when Tom Doyle, the City's contract electrical engineer, reviewed the plans, he noted that the difference between a loo and a 15% tolerance in measured foot - candles, as requested by the applicant, would not be perceptible to the eye. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Bobardt stated that Mr. Doyle stated that it is reasonable to expect some off -site spillover with the 5% differential. r n ,•N r. —, r-; " r -i .l ..r o-r w Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 May 1, 2002 In response to Councilmember Millhouse's question regarding whether difference in the lighting variation would be perceptible on a cumulative basis, Mr. Bobardt deferred to the applicant's architect. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Bobardt stated that the PRM2 lighting fixture, which uses a 400 -watt metal halide bulb, is recommended for use in the parking lot. Councilmember Harper requested that the coloration of the lighting be reviewed and expressed a concern about the blue coloration of some lighting in the City. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Brian Wolfe, 111 W. Ocean Avenue, Long Beach, architect for the proposed project, stated that the applicant requested a 15% variance, versus a 100 variance because the lighting consultant agreed that 15% is acceptable for the project; the cumulative impact will be extremely difficult for the human eye to perceive; the evenness of the illumination and the ratio of minimum to maximum is better than what the Municipal Code requires; the applicant prefers the metal halide light coloration for shopping centers because it is a true, full spectrum lighting level; and the blue coloration of lights seen elsewhere in the City, is probably produced by mercury vapor lights and not the metal halide lights that are proposed for this shopping center. He stated that Robert Exel, of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. is available for questions. In response to Councilmember Harper's concerns regarding the temperature of the lighting when it reaches approximately 4,000 Kelvins, Mr. Wolfe stated that he would determine the temperature to make sure it was at 3,000 Kelvins or below, for a more subdued look. Councilmember Mikos agreed with Councilmember Harper's concern about the overall effect of the lighting for the center. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 May 1, 2002 In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Wolfe stated that the light poles will rest on a six -inch base in a landscape planter, which complies with the City's requirements. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. Mr. Kueny stated that, if the Council wants staff to address the issue of the light temperature, staff recommends that it be placed in the Minor Modification conditions and the subject can also be addressed during the comprehensive review of the lighting section of the Municipal Code when it comes to the Council for their consideration. Councilmember Harper concurred with this recommendation and stated that the condition should state that the color temperature of the lighting fixtures will be approved by the Planning Director and that this does not need to come back to the Council for approval. Councilmember Harper stated that he would provide an exhibit to staff to guide them in determining the color temperature; the color temperature of light fixtures should be considered as a standard Condition of Approval for all projects in the future; however, to avoid delaying this project, the approval of the color temperature issues could be performed at staff level. Ms. Traffenstedt stated that the Planning Commission has requested that staff present all Chapters on Lighting Regulations to them; staff has presented the specific amendments for this project, in order to avoid delay; the Planning Commission wants to review the entire Ordinance; and the issue of Kelvins would be appropriate for that review, in case additional regulation needs to be incorporated into the Zoning requirements. In response to Mayor Hunter, Councilmember Harper stated that he wants to see the staff -level approval of the color temperature of the lights be included for this project. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 May 1, 2002 Mayor Hunter re- opened the public hearing to hear from Mr. Wolfe. Mr. Wolfe stated that the applicant agrees with the intent of the condition and will comply. Mayor Hunter re- closed the public hearing. Councilmember Mikos expressed concern regarding the 15% variance factor and asked if the Council would consider splitting the difference between 10% and 150 to make it 12.5% variance factor. Councilmember Harper responded by stating that the average human eye cannot distinguish the difference, even if the cumulative effect is increased to 20%. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1967 with an additional condition of approval that the color temperature of the light fixtures be measured and the appropriate Kelvin temperature be determined and approved at the staff level. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Mr. Montes read the title of Ordinance No. 280. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 280. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 280 introduced for first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01, Zone Change No. 2001 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Variance No. 2002 -01, a request for a Change in Land Use Designation from S (Schools) to VH (Very High Density) Residential, Zone Change from R -2 (Two Family Residential) to RPD 9 Dwelling Units /Acre, a 22 -Lot Single Family Residential Subdivision, and a Variance to Allow an 11.5 -Foot High Sound Wall on Property Located at the Northeast Corner of Flory Avenue and Los Anqeles Avenue, on the Application of Colmer Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 7 Mav 1, 2002 Development Company. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Consider the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1968 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001- 01; 4) Introduce Ordinance No. 281 for first reading Approving Zone Change No. 2001 -01; and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1969 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, and Variance No. 2002 -01 subject to conditions of approval, and including modification of TTM Condition No. 80 and deletion of RPD Condition No. 17.c. Councilmember Wozniak stated he would be absent for discussion of Item 9.B., due to a potential conflict of interest pertaining to his employer, the Moorpark United School District, being the property owner. AT THIS POINT in the meeting Councilmember Wozniak left the dais. The time was 7:35 p.m. Ms. Traffenstedt introduced contract planner, Joyce Parker - Bozylinski, who gave the staff report. Ms. Parker - Bozylinski stated that one new condition needs to be added to the project to require the applicant to pay for "No Parking" signs where needed along Flory Avenue. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Parker - Bozylinski stated that the applicant has been provided with a copy of the revised conditions of approval. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Ms. Parker - Bozylinski stated that the applicant is required to install landscaping and irrigation south of the property line wall in the area not required for street improvements and sidewalk. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Gilbert stated that the existing wall, east of Millard Street, is 10 -feet high. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Parker - Bozylinski stated that proposed maximum 11.5 -foot wall height for this project would be on only a few lots. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 May 1, 2002 Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Wayne Colmer, Colmer Development Company, 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 110, Calabasas, gave an overview of the in -fill project. He stated that For Sale Agreements have been executed with the School District to offer these homes for sale to school employees prior to offering them to the general public; he expressed concerns regarding three of the Conditions of Approval: 1) Condition No. 26 charges a $7,500 fee to prepare an Affordable Housing Agreement, which is inconsistent with what other developers are asked to pay; 2) Condition No. 115 was deleted by the Planning Commission, but still appears in this report; and 3) a revised Condition No. 24, delivered tonight, requires that the same amenities be included in the affordable units as in the market rate units, when there is not enough space to accommodate a fireplace and an indoor laundry room in the affordable units. John Newton, 165 High Street, #103, Moorpark, representing the applicant, discussed his involvement in the project. In response to Council, Mr. Colmer stated that in Condition No. 24, he is only objecting to the requirement for the amenities; the type of wall to be installed along Los Angeles Avenue is split -face, which discourages graffiti, vines will be planted along the wall, and trees will be placed in front of the wall; the affordable units are designed to be architecturally compatible with the market rate units; and he has reviewed all of the other revisions to conditions and is agreeable to them. In response to Mayor Hunter's question regarding the $7,500 fee in Condition No. 26, Mr. Kueny stated that each project is unique; the first project approved, receives the lower fee; and hopefully, the issue can be avoided by reaching an agreement to sell the affordable units to the City, alleviating the requirement for Colmer Development to pay the fee for the Affordable Housing Agreement. He also stated that if the City does not buy the units, the fee is an accurate representation of the cost and should cover Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 May 1, 2002 what it costs the City to prepare the Affordable Housing Agreement. Councilmember Millhouse stated that if trying to encourage affordable housing, c taken on how the developers are charged. would be inclined to move the rate down amount not to exceed whatever cost determines is acceptable. the City is :are should be He stated he to a maximum the Council In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Colmer stated that there should be some way for developers to pool their resources to get the Affordable Housing Agreement done with enough flexibility that each developer can insert the unique characteristics of their project without paying for a whole new agreement. He stated that he would like to see the City come up with a total cost to share among all of the developers. The Council concurred with Mayor Hunter's suggestion that since this is a very difficult piece of property to develop and this is a small project with only three affordable units, it would seem reasonable to charge a fee not to exceed $2,500 for the agreement. Mr. Colmer agreed to that amount. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Colmer stated that the negotiations for acquiring the land adjacent to this project from the Redevelopment Agency, as proposed by the Planning Commission, involves legal resolution prior to moving forward. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that it is in everyone's best interest to work out an arrangement for Colmer Development to purchase the adjacent property; however, there are timing issues, such as the approval time for a revised subdivision map, residential planned development, zone change, and general plan amendment for that property. He confirmed that Mr. Colmer has generously offered to provide his architectural plans for the construction of the additional units in case he is not the builder. Mr. Colmer stated that he has no problem giving the plans to the City; however, there may be a re -use fee due to the architect for his plans. :°,e,�� -'�i Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 10 May 1, 2002 In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated that staff confirms that the Planning Commission did recommend deletion of Condition No. 115. He recommended that the City Engineer provide the reasoning for that deletion. Mr. Brown stated that Condition No. 115 was originally included when the project was to construct a through street connecting Flory Avenue to Millard Street, and there is no longer a reason to require improvements to the storm drain facility. The Council concurred to eliminate Condition No. 115. A discussion among the Council, staff, and the applicant followed regarding the deletion of the fireplace and an inside laundry room for the affordable units as required in Condition No. 24. It was the concurrence of the Council to keep the staff language in the condition for all other amenities, excluding the fireplace and inside laundry room for all three affordable units. Mr. Colmer concurred with those changes. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Colmer stated that the timeline for starting construction of this project is dependent upon the completion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain elevations; and that Catholic Charities would have to move approximately 30 -60 days after that approval. Councilmember Mikos requested that if this item is approved, the Council Ad Hoc Committee should meet soon to explore all of the options available for relocating Catholic Charities. Mr. Kueny requested that the standard Assessment District condition be added to the project, which would require the applicant to form the District and pay a fee prior to selling any of the lots. He stated that the when the wall along Los Angeles Avenue is constructed, it is possible to have a garden wall in front of it; and that a condition will be added, based upon the approval of a Resolution by the City Council, prohibiting parking on the east side of Flory Avenue, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 Mav 1, 2002 that the developer will be obligated to post "No Stopping" signs. In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Colmer confirmed that they will be redesigning the parking lot where the police station is currently located; and that the two other conditions Mr. Kueny described are acceptable. Councilmember Millhouse, as a member of the Catholic Charities Ad Hoc Committee, stated that the committee is cognizant of the changes taking place. Councilmember Harper stated that the City needs to become involved in the FEMA map issue to expedite the process. Mr. Kueny stated that the County Flood Control District representative, as the official representative dealing with FEMA, has been invited to attend the scheduled joint City Council /Planning Commission meeting to participate in discussion of this issue. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1968 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -01. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, Councilmember Wozniak absent. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1969 approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5307, Residential Planned Development No. 2001 -01, and Variance No. 2002 -01 subject to conditions of approval, including modification of TTM Condition No. 80, deletion of RPD Condition No. 17.c., modifications to RPD Condition Nos. 24 and 26, deletion of RPD Condition No. 115; the addition of the standard Assessment District condition, and the condition to post the "No Parking" signs on Flory Avenue. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, Councilmember Wozniak absent. Mr. Montes read the title of Ordinance No. 281. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 281. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, Councilmember Wozniak absent. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 May 1, 2002 MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 281 introduced for first reading. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, Councilmember Wozniak absent. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 8:17 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:34 p.m. Councilmember Wozniak returned to the dais at this time. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Status Report on Ventura Council of Governments (VCOG) Staffing and Budget Options. (Continued from City Council meeting of April 17, 2002) Staff Recommendation: Continue VCOG Membership. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. He acknowledged additional information gained from a meeting of VCOG, which was held after the publication of this agenda, and which has been provided to Council. Mayor Hunter stated that he is willing to continue his membership in VCOG, which will meet quarterly; the annual budget will not exceed $76,500; the City's dues will be approximately $3,900; the City of Fillmore has indicated by letter, their intention to withdraw from VCOG; and he intends to closely monitor the City's participation and VCOG's ability to achieve their goals in the next fiscal year. Councilmember Mikos stated that she supports keeping VCOG as a means for discussion of the big picture items in the County; and that having quarterly meetings should be more productive. Councilmember Millhouse stated he is in favor of continuing VCOG membership and would like to see an east county organization formed, which would take local geographic needs into consideration. Mayor Hunter concurred that an east county organization would be beneficial. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 May 1, 2002 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to continue Ventura Council of Government membership. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Rescheduling of Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to reschedule the joint City Council and Planning meeting for May 8, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to reschedule the joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting for May 8, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. C. Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee for Development Agreement with USA Properties Fund, Inc. (USA). Staff Recommendation: Appoint an Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. Councilmembers Harper and Mikos volunteered to serve on the committee. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to appoint Councilmembers Harper and Mikos to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee for Development Agreement with USA Properties Fund, Inc. D. Consider Recommendation of the Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee to Postpone the Project. Staff Recommendation: Accept the Aquatic Facility Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation to postpone future action on the design of the Community Aquatic Facility. Ms. Lindley gave the staff report. Councilmember Harper, as a committee member, stated that he has discussed the issue with Dr. Walker at Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 May 1, 2002 Moorpark College and that the College is interested in working with the City to develop the aquatic facility. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Mayor Hunter requested this item return to Council as a status report, within 30 -days, to discuss what is learned after meeting with Moorpark College. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to postpone future action on the design of the Community Aquatic Facility and to schedule a status report on the discussions with Moorpark College for the first meeting in June 2002. E. Consider Adoption of 2002 Legislative Program. Staff Recommendation: Adopt the 2002 Legislative Program. Mr. Riley gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter stated that he wants to continue an aggressive and proactive Legislative Program as it is • very important vehicle to use to advocate or oppose • particular piece of legislation using the broad topics in the program, which are written in such a way that enables Council to draft letters in a timely manner. Councilmember Mikos stated that she supports the concept of the program. She requested that stress related injuries /illnesses be deleted from Item F. under Labor Relations. Mr. Kueny stated that the wording of Item F. is modeled after the League of California Cities, which puts limits on what can be claimed for stress related issues under Workers' Compensation. Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there are already specific provisions and limits placed on stress related issues pursuant to law; and that the City's Workers' Compensation insurance carrier keeps the City informed of all legal requirements with regard to claims. Councilmember Mikos stated that she was reassured by the explanation on these limits. ✓ •J �..p �.OV Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 May 1, 2002 Councilmember Mikos stated that she would like wording added to Item B. under Transportation to expand the interpretation by emphasizing local public transit systems, streets and roads, and other transportation facilities or improvements. Mayor Hunter stated that the only problem with being that specific is that the more narrowly the program is written, the more likely staff will have to return to Council for authorization to send a letter. Councilmember Harper recommended expanding the language rather than narrowing it by using the words "local transportation, transportation systems ", which would include mass transit, light rail, etc. Councilmember Mikos concurred with that language. In response to Councilmember Mikos' request to add a clause to Item A. under Environment to ensure continued public participation, Mr. Kueny suggested adding "and maintain public participation ", which would be interpreted as not eroding the public participation that already exists. Councilmember Mikos concurred. In response to Councilmember Mikos' concern regarding reducing or eliminating local government Superfund liability in Item C. under Environment, Mr. Kueny stated that it is not the intent of this item to eliminate culpability, but is related to landfill cases where some cities have been severely impacted. Councilmember Millhouse concurred with Councilmember Mikos' concern on the issue of the Superfund liability and recommended adding the verbiage, "as long as there is no direct local responsibility for violations." Councilmember Wozniak suggested leaving the language in Item C as written since if a party is responsible, they will be named in a lawsuit anyway. Councilmembers Mikos and Millhouse recommended changing the language. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 May 1, 2002 Mr. Kueny stated that staff looks at these issues with regard to the impact to the city of Moorpark and would not send a letter if the City is not impacted. Mr. Montes stated that the typical area where problems could arise would be in the area of a city's responsibility for providing a trash franchise to pick up the trash and whether the trash is delivered to a proper facility. Councilmember Millhouse stated that there are three categories of Superfund liability where you are either: 1) an owner /operator of a trash site; 2) a generator of trash; or 3) a transporter of trash to the site. He continued by stating that the area of concern is when a city is the owner /operator of a landfill and the liability is at its greatest. The solution would be to insert language for local government "owner /operator" Superfund liability. Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Mikos concurred with that change. In response to Councilmember Mikos' concern that streamlining in Item D under Environment would mean that clean air targets would not be met, Councilmember Harper recommended adding general language reflecting "without jeopardizing clean air quality." Councilmember Mikos concurred. Councilmember Mikos stated that in regard to Local Government Financing, she would like to support legislation that would explore revising the sales tax distribution to help with revenue and better serve the smaller cities. Mr. Kueny stated that he would recommend against that, as it is a subject that should be brought back to Council due to specific impacts where smaller cities would actually be subsidizing large /older cities that may have a more established tax base. Councilmember Mikos stated that exploring other alternatives for improving the city of Moorpark's situation should be a priority. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 17 May 1, 2002 Councilmember Harper concurred with Councilmember Mikos' recommendation to explore ways of influencing legislators to gain equitable sharing of the sales tax revenues. He cited, for example, the local Assemblyman's request for items to carry forward to Sacramento. Mayor Hunter requested that language in Item M. under Local Government Finance be clarified, by adding after the word authorizes, "a ballot measure to restore." In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to adopt the 2002 Legislative Program, as amended. F. Consider Report from Zelman Ad Hoc Committee regarding Pylon Sign Height and Location Entry Treatments. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Kueny stated that the applicant has modified the proposal for the pylon sign, moving away from the off - site sign due to Caltrans restrictions; they are now considering on -site signage at the northeast corner of the site; and the Ad Hoc Committee has requested that the applicant prepare more specific information for consideration at the committee meeting next week. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council not to take action until the Ad Hoc Committee meets with the applicant to consider the new information. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 17, 2001. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 18 May 1, 2002 Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of April 10, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - May 1, 2002. Manual Warrants 109078 - 109081 $ 12,461.65 109186 - 109191 $ 1,927.52 Voided Warrants 107267 & 108701 & $ (1,363.81) 108861 & 109081 & 109191 & 109207 & 109208 Payroll Liability 109192 - 109199 $ 11,534.25 Warrants Regular Warrants 109082 - 109185 & $ 23,166.36 109200 - 109238 $473,473.62 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider a Request for the Release of Sureties for Improvements Associated with Tract 4980, Residential Planned Development No. 98 -06, Specific Plan No. 92- 01. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to release surety #SD00100544 for $34,500.00. D. Notice of Completion for the New Los Angeles Avenue Bridge Widening Project. Staff Recommendation: Accept the work as completed and adopt Resolution No. 2002- 1970. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) E. Consider License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League. Staff Recommendation: Approve a License Agreement with Tri Valley Roller Hockey League, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. F. Consider Plans and Specifications for City Hall Annex Generator Connection and Award a Contract to Venco Electric. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the design plans for the City Hall Annex back -up power system; 2) Award a contract to Venco Electric, at a cost not to Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 19 May 1, 2002 exceed $9,680; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute said contract on behalf of the City and approve the use of energy conservation measure monies in the FY 2001/02 budget for the generator project. G. Consider Authorizing the Use of $20,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds Previously Allocated to the Boys & Girls Club for Roof /Ceiling Repairs to the Club's Teen Center. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the use of $20,000 (FY 2000- 2001), previously allocated to the Boys and Girls Club for window replacement in the gym, for roof and ceiling repairs for the Teen Center. H. Consider Amending Previously Approved California Law Enforcement Equipment Program ( CLEEP) Expenditures. Staff Recommendation: Approve said modifications to the purchasing of the listed equipment with the mentioned CLEEP funds as contained in the agenda report. I. Consider Granting Additional Administrative Leave to Designated Employees. Staff Recommendation: Approve granting of additional administrative leave consistent with the agenda report. J. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award a Contract, and Adopt a Budget Resolution for the Construction of the Restroom / Concession / Storage Facility at Arroyo vista Community Park. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the restroom facility; 2) Award a contract to Tasco Construction, Inc. for $263,538; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002- 1971, appropriating an additional $171,000 to the project from the Park Improvement Fund - Community Zone. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) 12. ORDINANCES: None. 13. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny requested that the City Council go into closed session for discussion of Items 13.A. (one case), 13.B. (one case) and 13.D. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 20 May 1, 2002 Mr. Montes announced that t creating significant exposure and circumstances are known consist of the recent Court of Burbank prohibiting sectarian meeting. he facts and circumstances to litigation, which facts to potential plaintiffs, Appeal decision in Rubin v. prayer at a City Council MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for discussion of Items 13.A. (one case) , 13.B. (one case) and 13.D. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO22256) AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council meeting was recessed to convene the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency closed session. The time was 9:15 p.m. The Council reconvened into closed session at 9:50 p.m. Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; and Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk /Assistant to the City Manager. The Council reconvened into open session at 10:16 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that Items 13.A. (one case) 13.B. (one case) and 13.D were discussed and that there was no action to report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 21 May 1, 2002 14. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 10:16 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California Auqust 21, 2002 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on August 21, 2002, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. 2. INVOCATION: Pastor Mike Woolley, Community Christian Church, gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mary Lindley, Community Services Director, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Wozniak, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Robert LeMay, Sheriff's Department; Dave Bobardt, Planning Manager; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Blanca Garza, Deputy City Clerk. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Recognition of Deputy Mike Hartmann, 2001 Moorpark Police Officer of the Year. Mayor Hunter presented Deputy Mike Hartman with a Certificate of Recognition honoring him as 2001 Moorpark Police Officer of the Year. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 August 21, 2002 Captain LeMay contributions in city of Moorpark. recognized Deputy Hartman's maintaining the low crime rate in the B. City Manager's Monthly Report. Mr. Kueny gave the monthly report. He discussed the State budget deadlock and its impacts on the City's budget; the departure of Dana Shigley, Administrative Services Director and subsequent recruitment process; the successful recruitment of a Budget and Finance Manager; the addition of three staff members in the Community Development Department who will begin work on the backlog of projects; the reduction of speeding on Tierra Rejada Road and Collins Drive as a result of the installation of "speed feedback" signs; the continuing progress to widen Los Angeles Avenue; the pending installation of a second set of restrooms at Arroyo Vista Community Park and the anticipated completion of Phase II of the park by July of 2003; the planning taking place for the City's 20th Anniversary Celebration in July 2003; and the site planning and design of the Moorpark Police Station due to be completed in approximately 24 months. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: Debra Tash, a Moorpark business owner, spoke about three of her employees living in the Redevelopment area who are having difficulty refinancing their homes due to the City's 50% Burn Down Rule, which influences banks to only want to lend at a commercial rate of 9 %. She stated that the regular residential rate is only 5 %, and asked the City to consider the three properties to be exempt from the 50% Burn Down rule. Mr. Kueny stated that a Burn Down policy has been established in every city and county to deal with non- conforming uses; in this case there are residences situated on commercial property; and non - conforming use policies are applied citywide not just in the Redevelopment area. Mr. Montes stated that most cities have a legal Non - Conforming Use Ordinance, and if a prior legal use becomes illegal following a Code amendment, revising development standards, such use is allowed to continue as long as it is not expanded. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 August 21, 2002 In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kueny stated that the reasoning behind the policy is to not perpetuate the non - conforming use. Mayor Hunter directed staff to agendize this matter for the next Council meeting. Colin and Victoria Velazquez, business owners at 601 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, read a letter to the Council regarding City Council closed session discussion of the City's attempts to claim their property; and objected to the participation by Councilmember Millhouse in that decision - making, since in his civilian capacity as an attorney, he has recently represented their tenant in a successful lawsuit against them. They requested that Councilmember Millhouse abstain from any further participation in this matter. Gerald Goldstein, a Moorpark resident, spoke about the possibility of building stores in the commercial area with housing above or in the rear; the dangers of Pit bull dogs in his neighborhood; the lack of access to the Animal Control Department in the evenings and on weekends; and the need for more bus stop signs. 7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Councilmember Millhouse requested that Items ll.F. and ll.L. be pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Mayor Hunter announced the Arts in Park event to take place on Labor Day, Monday, September 2, 2002. Councilmember Harper requested a future agenda item to discuss an appropriate ceremony to recognize the Anniversary of September 11th Mr. Kueny suggested discussing this request at a Special meeting on August 27, 2002. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 August 21, 2002 9. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Consider Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -10, a Request to Construct an Approximately 113,994 Square Foot Mini - Warehouse /Office Building on a 112,184 Square Foot Parcel Located at 875 Los Angeles Avenue, at the Northwest Corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue, on the Application of Asadurian Investments (Assessor Parcel No. 511- 0 -070- 55). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and continue the public hearing to October 16, 2002; 2) Appoint a Council Ad Hoc Committee and direct the Committee and staff to negotiate a proposed Development Agreement for Council consideration on or before October 16, 2002; and 3) Direct the applicant to prepare revised plans at a floor area ration (FAR) of 0.76 and provide parking /loading adjacent or nearby the ground floor units and bring back those plans for consideration of approval by the Council with the proposed Development Agreement. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. In response to stated that the based on the staff agreeE determination use warrants issue for the revenue issue. Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Hogan .76 FAR ratio recommended by staff is one used in the A -Z Storage facility; with the Planning Commission's that the intensity of the mini - warehouse the higher ratio; and that the primary Ad Hoc Committee would be to address the Mr. Kueny stated that the Ad Hoc Committee would also be considering exceeding the General Plan requirement of the .38 FAR. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny confirmed that the A -Z Storage facility with .76 FAR and the industrial building to the north with .48 FAR were constructed prior to the 1992 General Plan Update; and the Jiffy Lube with .28 FAR was constructed after the 1992 General Plan Update. In response to Mayor Hunter's concern that there is not enough room to close the gate behind trucks Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 August 21, 2002 accessing the property, Mr. Hogan stated that staff does not feel the plan adequately addresses the issue of enabling trucks to park as close to storage units as possible for easy loading and unloading without blocking the fire lane. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Porter stated that currently, the plan is for 600 storage units; however, that number may change based on market demand. In response to Council, Mr. Hogan stated that the number of units can vary based upon their size; that staff has not done a study of the vacancy rate of other storage units in the City; however, the applicant has provided information indicating that most units are already leased; that there was concern on the part of the Planning Commission that the starker elevations be positioned out of the public view; the foam articulation on the exterior is protected by tubular steel; and embellishment of the tubular steel could be considered if the Council so directs. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Greg Call, consultant from Storage Works, 17805 Skypark Circle, Suite E, Irvine, representing Asadurian Investments, stated he was available for questions. In response to Council, Mr. Call stated that his company performed a feasibility study for Asadurian Investments and an additional study, as directed by the Planning Department, in regard to the demand for storage units; the studies indicate a demand for additional storage units in the City; that the effect of changing the FAR would reduce the net rentable square footage of the project; that he concurs with the Planning Commission's decision that a reduction is not necessary; the current FAR complies with all fire regulations insuring that fire trucks can pass freely on site; the Planning staff indicated that they were comfortable with the FAR; and the applicant is willing to comply with any fire regulations that address public safety. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 August 21, 2002 Mr. Hogan stated that as the newly appointed Community Development Director, he was not involved in any detailed analysis of the project until recently; the applicant is correct that the project does meet the turning radius required by the fire department; however, the plan assumes that no vehicles will be allowed inside to offload materials, when in reality, that seems not to be the case; and that he is concerned about the FAR. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny gave the history on the General Plan FAR. He expressed concern regarding how diligent parking enforcement would be within the storage project. Councilmember Harper stated that it is reasonable to assume that no one will move materials by hand - truck; renters will drive up to their storage unit to offload from their vehicle; therefore the aisles have to be wide enough to accommodate emergency response vehicle as well as other vehicles. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Call stated that to improve the view of the project from Los Angeles Avenue, the elevations could be redesigned to more closely resemble apartment buildings. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Councilmember Millhouse, who had watched the Planning Commission meeting, stated that Commissioner Parvin's negative vote for this project was generated by her concern that this project would generate very few jobs for the City, as opposed to some other type of industrial development. Councilmember Mikos stated that she supports the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee; she does not believe people will want to hand -truck their belongings to the storage units; that blocking the aisles with trucks off - loading goods will be a safety hazard; and she concurs with Councilmembers Harper and Wozniak that the .76 FAR level will create a dangerous situation, which she could not support. Ken Carren, project architect, 24338 El Toro Road, Suite E -217, Laguna Woods, in response to Council, stated that reducing the FAR would not necessarily 0 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 August 21, 2002 affect the drive aisle width, as he could eliminate the entire second story of Building A to bring the project into compliance with the FAR; the facility has been designed to accommodate a hook and ladder fire vehicle along with another vehicle in the drive aisle; the intensity of use would only be approximately 5 car trips per hour; it would be very uncommon that two vehicles would be in the drive aisle at the same time; the applicant is not concerned that a fire truck would be unable to get through; the City Engineer has already required the widening of the aisles to his satisfaction; and the design of the project is more commercial than residential in style. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Carren stated that the entire drive aisle is a fire lane. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Brown stated that staff's initial concern was that there be sufficient stacking room in the driveway for a large vehicle, such as the largest rental truck, to wait at the gate before gaining access to the storage unit; subsequent investigation showed that larger, eighteen - wheeled tractor trailers frequently visit these storage facility sites and are driven by professional drivers who would have the experience to know to park parallel in the street prior to accessing the site; and that the drive aisle widths were reviewed for turning radii for eighteen - wheeled trucks, not for fire response vehicles, as that was left to the Fire District to determine. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan stated that the minimum width required for a fire lane is 24- feet; the drive aisles for this project are 30 -feet wide; and to expect vehicles to park in the remaining 6 -feet, is unrealistic. He indicated that the Fire Department would find parking in the lane to be illegal; and this issue did not come up when the Planning Commission considered the project. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there is one Written Statement card opposing the project and a letter opposing the project from A -Z Storage. ' _ _ '7 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 August 21, 2002 Councilmember Millhouse stated that there appears to be a genuine demand for an additional storage facility and it would be beneficial to have an Ad Hoc Committee work with the applicant on alternatives to widening the drive aisles, such as installing fire sprinklers, and to discuss enhancements to the architecture. Councilmember Harper concurred with Councilmember Millhouse that enough issues have been raised to warrant the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee; and that there appears to be a need for additional storage units in the City, as he has visited the owner of A -Z Storage and learned that he plans to expand the facility off -site. Councilmembers Millhouse and Wozniak volunteered to serve on the Ad Hoc Committee to work with the applicant on the issues. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to: 1) Continue this item with public hearing open to October 16, 2002; and 2) Approve the appointment of Councilmembers Millhouse and Wozniak to an Ad Hoc Committee to meet with staff to negotiate a proposed Development Agreement with Asadurian Investments for Council's consideration on October 16, 2002. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2002 -04 Consider an Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Related to Lighting Regulations. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) adopt Resolution No. 2002- , to adopt the Negative Declaration prepared on behalf of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2002 -04; and 3) introduce Ordinance No. , for first reading approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2002 -04. Schedule second reading and adoption for September 4, 2002. Mr. Bobardt gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Bobardt stated that he is not aware of the recommendations proposed by Moorpark College astronomers during the Hidden Creek hearings; low pressure sodium lighting is favored by most astronomers because it is at a low Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 9 Auqust 21, 2002 band width, making it easy to filter out; and the new standards do not take into consideration what was specifically recommended by Moorpark College for their observatory. Councilmember Mikos stated that it would seem that it would be important to have the recommendations of the astronomers from Moorpark College taken into consideration for the new standards. Councilmember Harper stated that as a member of the Astronomy Department at Moorpark College, he could look into the matter; the Dark Sky Initiative website promotes criteria for installing astronomically friendly outdoor lighting and encourages the use of low pressure sodium lighting; unfortunately the light generated by this type of lighting is an ugly, bright, yellow- orange color; the proposal in the staff report encourages the use of filters on telescopes that eliminate this light; another criteria promoted by the Dark Sky Initiate is for shielding on light fixtures to eliminate light scatter upward and direct the light downward, which is also mentioned in the staff report; and it might be beneficial for the College to make comments on that section of the Ordinance before it is adopted. In response to Council, Mr. Bobardt stated that the rationale behind the prohibition of laser lights came from input obtained from the Dark Sky Association's model lighting ordinance, which also prohibits search lights pointed skyward; any use of laser lights requires a federal permit; it was staff's intention that the prohibition of laser lights would be for an on -going use not a special one -time event for which a permit would be issued; and that if proper permits were obtained for a laser light show there would be no violation. Councilmember Harper stated that companies that put on laser light shows do obtain the proper permits and follow FAA regulations so there is not much of a problem to the observatories; and allowing laser light shows with a temporary use permit would seem appropriate. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 August 21, 2002 In response to Councilmember Harper's concern regarding what guidelines staff will use to judge the appropriate color temperature of lighting, Mr. Bobardt stated that staff will be making a judgment call on a case by case basis, between the use of metal halide lights with a bluer color tone where color rendition is important, for example at an auto sales lot where distinguishing the color of the vehicles is important, and the use of high pressure sodium lights with a pinker color tone where warm colors are used to highlight architecture. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Bobardt stated that the code was amended to alleviate the need for staff to test a site, since a photometric plan is required for all commercial, industrial and residential projects, which reveals the light candles on a grid for every 10 -, up to 25 -feet; however, the light meter is a still a good tool for Code Enforcement to use to test for light spill -over. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Bobardt stated that the proposed change to the standard is for 950 of the grid points on the photometric plan to comply with the maximum 7 -foot candles, as opposed to the current standard of 1000; and the Ordinance is written to require enforcement of whichever are the stricter standards, the current standards or standards to be adopted by the State in 2005. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse Harper seconded a motion to: 1) public hearing open to September staff to request Moorpark C011E provide comments on the draft carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: moved and Councilmember Continue this item with 18, 2002; and 2) Direct !ge staff to review and Ordinance. The motion A. Consider American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) Use Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Approve five -year use agreement with American Youth Soccer Organization, as Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 11 Auqust 21, 2002 submitted subject to final language approved by City Manager and City Attorney and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Mr. Hartnett gave the staff report. Mr. Montes stated that he concurs that the Hold Harmless Clause is appropriate, consistent with past practices, and is authorized by current prevailing law in the State of California. Councilmember Millhouse recommended deleting the word "sole" in the Indemnification Clause, to reflect a comparable negligence standard between the AYSO and the city of Moorpark. Tom Bradford, Regional Commissioner for AYSO, 13760 Donnybrook Lane, Moorpark, stated that the Indemnification Clause should reflect mutual indemnification; the prevailing principles in the State of California are comparative negligence; and any other arrangement would be unjust and inconsistent with California law. He continued by stating that the City should consider reducing the fees for rentals as for years AYSO has provided this consideration for over 200 Moorpark children. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Bradford stated that AYSO Board meetings cost approximately $20 -30 an hour, the meetings last about 2 hours, and are held 20 times per year. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley stated that the City has not had any instance where they have been held liable in any of the City parks; the City charges the major youth sports organizations only $1.00 to use the park playing field; when a group is using a City park, there is the concern of increased liability; and that the normal charge for using a field is $10.00 per hour. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Lindley stated that this is the same Indemnification that the Moorpark School District signs when they use City playing fields. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 12 August 21, 2002 In response to Councilmember Harper's concerns about the sole negligence clause, Mr. Montes stated that when a City -owned and maintained sports facility is used by a non -City sports program, at virtually no cost to that program, it would be standard to try to minimize the City's liability to the greatest extent possible. If the word "sole" is removed from the contract, the typical result would be that when an injury occurs and a lawsuit results, the City could end up in a dispute with the other party over the cost for defense and may ultimately, have to pay those costs. In response to Councilmember Harper's inquiry regarding how the cost of insurance for AYSO is affected by leaving the language in tact, Mr. Montes stated that the clause is not limited to the cost of insurance and AYSO may have additional concerns. Councilmember Millhouse stated that AYSO can name the City as additional insured under their policy and the insurance company would provide the defense. Mr. Montes stated that the insurance company could dispute whether they should pay the cost for the defense unless it is clear in the agreement which entity will pay for the defense. Councilmember Millhouse stated that the insurance coverage for negligence on the part of the policy holder would require that the insurance company provide a defense; the potential that the City would be responsible for the cost of defense is remote; and the fact that the City only gains $1.00 a year from this agreement is offset by the intangible benefits of a low crime rate in the community, which can be attributed in part, to giving the 2,000 or more AYSO participants something constructive to do with their time. He went on to state that he would be willing to discuss staff's concerns regarding the fees as part of a committee discussion or as a separate agenda item. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley stated that she does not recall a recent change to the fee schedule for non - profits. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 August 21, 2002 Councilmember Harper stated that the fee the City is charging for the use of a meeting room seems high; and staff may want to do a comparable study of what the Moorpark Unified School District and Moorpark College charge non - profit organizations for the use of their meeting rooms. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to: 1) Approve five -year Use Agreement with American Youth Soccer Organization, with a change to the indemnification language to delete the word "sole" and that the final language be subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Montes stated that by removing the word % %sole" from the Indemnification Agreement, the City's insurance is protected up to $1 million for each occurrence. He further stated that it would not be his preference to include "mutual indemnification ". Councilmember Harper stated that the coverage seems adequate for most broken legs and he is comfortable supporting the motion. In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Montes stated that he would concur with the removal of the word "sole "; however, he would not be in favor of including "mutual indemnification ". In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the long term impact of removing the word "sole" cannot be known until there is an accident; the City does its best to maintain the parks in a safe manner; and the organizations using the parks are assisting as they can. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mayor Hunter requested that the Parks and Recreation Commission look into the issue of the fee structure for organizations in the community with consideration given to reducing fees charged to non - profits. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark. California Paqe 14 August 21, 2002 B. Discussion of Traffic Issues on Cedarpine Lane. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. Councilmember Mikos stated that as members of the Transportation and Streets Committee, she and Councilmember Millhouse do not agree on the three -way stop at the corner of Cedarpine and Deering Lanes. She indicated that she opposes the stop signs as they will create more of a problem and seem inappropriate. Councilmember Millhouse stated that a variety of methods to control speed on Cedarpine Lane have been tried and been unsuccessful; staff's recommendation for continued enforcement and public educational outreach efforts is not feasible due to lack of available resources within the Moorpark Police Department; and he sees the stop signs as the only alternative. Councilmember Harper stated that he lives near a similar situation and he would not advocate placing a stop sign at the exit of a cul -de -sac. Councilmember Millhouse stated that the neighbors in the area want the stop sign and regardless that this is not a common practice, he feels there is not a downside to placing this one stop sign. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Mayor Hunter stated that the risk is greater if the stop sign is not in place; and he concurs with Councilmember Millhouse that with the downhill speed, curve, and volume of Cedarpine Lane traffic at Deering Lane, the stop sign is warranted. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Mayor Hunter seconded a motion to return to Council on September 4, 2002, with a Resolution for the installation of a three -way stop at the intersection of Cedarpine and Deering Lanes. The motion carried by vote 4 -0, with Councilmember Mikos abstaining. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 August 21, 2002 AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 9:16 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:40 p.m. C. Consideration of Remaining Outstanding Issues - Toll Brothers (Moorpark Country Club Estates). Staff Recommendation: 1) Direct the applicant to file the Minor Modifications and direct the Community Development Director to approve the modifications as indicated; 2) Direct the second amendment to the Settlement Agreement, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney, and authorize the Mayor to execute said second amendment; and 3) Direct staff not to issue additional building permits until Toll files the Minor Modification and second amendment to the Settlement Agreement; and staff has determined the Minor Modification application to be complete and the second amendment to be consistent with Council action. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. He provided the following changes to the Attachments in the agenda report: 1) Item No. 4. on stamped page 197 should also include a separate maintenance program for the orchards and address the issues of maintenance of orchards close to residential developments; and 2) Item No. 5. on stamped page 198, next to last line from the end, instead of `Community Development Director through... ", it should read "Community Development Director according to the elements in the approved Perimeter ... "; and 3) Item No. 9 as it continues on stamped page 200, the sixth line down, should read "Championship Drive" rather than "C" Street; and 4) Item No. 10 on stamped page 200 should indicate the "50th" home of Phase 1 rather than the "95th" home. Craig Messi, representing Toll Brothers, 7142 Trivino Drive, Moorpark, stated that they share the City's concerns about safety, both for their residents and the community at large. He described the progress made on the project. He further stated that they share the City's disappointment with Toll not being able to fulfill certain requirements prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy; they agree to the new Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 16 Auqust 21, 2002 timeframes for the completion of the improvements; that meeting the timeframes is also dependent on the City and other agencies meeting their deadlines; and they were disappointed to learn that additional building permits will be not issued. Mr. Messi informed the Council that Toll Brothers is working to complete the golf course parking lot in time to host the Boys and Girls Club tournament on September 30th; new guidelines issued by the City have required redesign of the last 9 holes of the golf course, which will cause delays; they will be responding to each violation enumerated in a memo dated July 3, 2002, regarding Country Club Estates, but want to note that some of the violations have been misrepresented; they have never received a Stop Order on the site and have always responded to corrections or requirements set down by the City; and he commended both the City agencies and outside agencies for taking up the challenge to allow Toll to have approvals resulting in their first home being scheduled for delivery next week. Dick Pool Associated Transportation Engineers, representing Toll Brothers, 7142 Trivino Drive, Moorpark, gave a presentation on roadway designs to meet the Tentative Tract conditions and Caltrans standards. He discussed the installation of the traffic signal at Grimes Canyon Road; and the levels of service at "C" or better with adequate sight distance for the three intersections on the project. Cary Lowe, Land Use attorney, representing Toll Brothers, 55 South Lake Avenue, Pasadena, addressed issues related to project conditions imposed with Minor Modification No. 3 and an error in the record as contained in City Council Resolution No. 2001 -1875, Section 3., Item 6., stating "Applicant's proportionate share shall also be defined to include frontage along Walnut Canyon Road for a distance of 500 ± feet south of the southeasterly corner of the subject property as shown on the Tentative Map for Tract No. 4620." He stated that in reviewing the minutes and video tape from the City Council meeting, there is no mention of this requirement; the Resolution needs to be corrected, as this directly affects proposed revisions to the project conditions Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 17 August 21, 2002 as presented in Item No. 6. of Attachment No. 2 of this agenda report, which states, "or as otherwise stipulated in the Settlement Agreement Amendment 2...," which is too open -ended and they request that it be stricken. He further stated that they have no problems or concerns with the rest of the items. Michael Cosenza, a Moorpark resident, local teacher, and a buyer of a Country Club Estates home, stated that he has been in escrow for 18- months; he appreciates the Council's previous actions in support of the future homeowners of Country Club Estates; the buyers left the last Council meeting with the understanding that Certificates of Occupancy would not be delayed due to conditions related to the roads and the golf course and that 95 homes in Phase 1 would be permitted to proceed and building permits would not be subject to those conditions; however, this staff report seems to reflect differently. He requested that the Council accept Toll Brothers' counter- proposals to keep the project moving, as many buyers are living in temporary housing waiting for close of escrow. He asked the Council to remove the condition requiring the CC &R's to prohibit the use of golf carts, as State law allows their use on any roadway that has a speed limit of 35 mph or less. He reminded the Council and staff that the home buyers are the ones caught in the middle of this struggle between the applicant and the City. Mayor Hunter clarified that there is a distinction between low speed vehicles and golf carts; golf carts are prohibited on any public streets in the State of California because they do not have seat belts, head lights, license plates, and are not registered with the State. Michael Sullivan, a Moorpark resident and buyer of Lot -1 in Country Club Estates, stated he is uncomfortable with Item No. 2. of Attachment No. 2, as his family is living in temporary housing at this time and are only days away from occupying their home as long as the City does not hold up Certificates of Occupancy. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that 9 Written Statement cards supporting the comments Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 18 August 21, 2002 made by Michael Cosenza were submitted by Moorpark residents: Sohair Asaad, Abul Arastu, Kris Hansen, Mary Leyden, Patrick Leyden, Berill Mitchell, Joan Mitchell, Michael Pocito, and Sharon Pocito; and 1 Written Statement card was submitted by Mike Nix, General Manager for Moorpark Country Club, 11800 Championship Drive, Moorpark, opposing staff's recommendation to stop issuing building permits for the project. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Messi stated that the sewer lift system for the Tract's sewer system will be operational by next Tuesday. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan agreed that Item No. 10. of Attachment No. 2 should also be changed from occupancy of 95th home of Phase 1 to occupancy of 50th home of Phase 1. He clarified that this change would not delay any of the occupancies that are at, or near completion. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that in regard to Item No. 11 of Attachment No. 2, the intent is that as long as the developer controls the vote, they would cast an affirmative ballot. He clarified that if an Assessment District ballot measure occurs, the developer would have to cast affirmative ballots for the lots they still own. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that Item No. 13. of Attachment No. 2 refers strictly to City use of the golf course, not, for example, the Boys and Girls Club. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny confirmed that it was not the City that held up the developer from making the improvements to Walnut Canyon Road. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Messi stated that it was a Caltrans suggestion, not a working condition that Toll Brothers negotiate with the private land owner for the relocation of his driveway on Walnut Canyon Road. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan confirmed that draft CC &R's have already been Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 19 August 21, 2002 submitted and that Item No. 2 of Attachment No. 1 could be amended to reflect that change. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the Tract is laid out in such a way that precludes golf carts from being used to travel on private roads to get to the club house or the golf course. In response to Mayor Hunter's concern for holding Toll Brothers accountable for the safety improvements that have been promised to the community, without holding the residents as hostages, Mr. Kueny stated that it is possible to complete the amendment to the Settlement Agreement within a few weeks with the only consequence being the curtailment of building permit issuance. In response to Mayor Hunter's request to hear Toll Brothers explanation for their continued deviations from the approved plans, Mr. Messi gave an example of one instance of their substitution when approved corrugated metal pipe reacted adversely, during testing, to the soil on site and cast -in -place pipe was proposed as a substitute with the full knowledge of, and without any objection from, the City Engineer, who commented that he would not support cast -in -place pipe in a public- right -of -way, but that it would be acceptable for use under the driving range. Mayor Hunter stated that the substitution of pipe is in violation of the approved plans and the City Engineer's verbal approval is not sufficient authorization to alter the approved plans, which is a similar situation to the landscaping that was installed without an approved plan. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Messi stated he understands the Council's frustration; however, they were led to believe by the consultants that approval of the landscape plans was imminent and along with the verbal approval of the former Community Development Director, they went ahead with the installation of landscaping on the slopes. He further stated that when Toll Brothers discovers anything going wrong on the site, they move quickly to correct the concern, while if City staff finds something wrong, they immediately conclude something devious is transpiring. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 20 Auqust 21, 2002 In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Messi stated that he is not aware of any testing that concluded that cast -in -place pipe fails within five years; cast - in -place pipe has been used extensively at the Wood Ranch golf course in Simi Valley, which is much older that five years; and that Toll Brothers did not flaunt the conditions of approval, but did move forward upon verbal approvals rather than written approvals. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Messi explained that the original condition for Walnut Canyon Road in Minor Modification No. 3, showed that Toll Brothers would pay their prorata share of the Walnut corridor improvements; Mr. Lowe is objecting to the sentence that has been added, that not only would Toll Brothers contribute to their share of the improvements, but would now be required to improve 500 -feet of roadway to the south of the project. Mr. Kueny stated that since the West Pointe project has been approved, the intent of the condition is that each developer would informally follow the Walnut Canyon Corridor Study to improve their fair share; and that staff will make the necessary changes to the condition, which will require that the Resolution return to the Council for approval. Councilmember Millhouse stated that there is a distrust present between the developer and the City, a compromise must be found to allow this project to move forward for the benefit of those who need to move into the homes; it is understandable that the developer is concerned that approvals must move through the City processes in a timely manner; conversely, quality plans need to be submitted in order to avoid multiple changes; and he is open to suggestions from the Council on how to move forward. Dick Hunsaker, civil engineer for Toll Bros. from Hunsaker and Associates, stated that the corrugated metal pipe was shown on the grading plan; it was brought out to the site; Mr. Brown asked that it be tested prior to installation for reaction to the soil, which is a normal procedure; it failed; therefore a substitution of cast -in -place pipe was made. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 21 August 21, 2002 Mr. Messi stated that from his company's point of view, their civil engineer has now addressed all changes required by the City; and that they would like to begin construction of the homes for 60 buyers who purchased approximately three months ago; Toll Brothers has invested a great deal of money in this project and the community; and is not going to do anything to risk that investment. Councilmember Harper stated that the process this project is following is not working due to the length of time between Council meetings; more problems arise between meetings than are resolved; and asked if a Council committee could be formed to authorize the Mayor and another Councilmember to work with staff to make decisions on issuance of building permits and allow the buyers to move into their homes more quickly. Mr. Kueny stated that the Council has already made a decision on 95 occupancies and may direct staff to start issuing building permits as they deem necessary; once the amendment to the Settlement Agreement is concluded, there should be no more issues; and the only remaining questions is when Toll Brothers will sign the amended Settlement Agreement. Councilmember Harper stated that the City Manager is being optimistic and it would be helpful to have a Council committee work on this without bringing every little issue back to a public hearing. Councilmember Mikos stated that the Council committee is a possibility, but she does not believe it will provide an incentive for the developer to cooperate; allowing them to construct the 95 homes before signing the amended Settlement Agreement does not guarantee that more issues will not materialize; and that there must be some incentive that will cost them money to make them cooperate. Councilmember Millhouse stated that it appears that the only remaining issues are the prerequisites and the change to the Minor Modification No. 3., in regard to Walnut Canyon Road, which can be resolved prior to the amended Settlement Agreement; therefore he proposed that the Council authorize issuing up to 60 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 22 August 21, 2002 building permits with the stipulation that Toll Brothers sign the amendment to the Settlement Agreement within a few days. Councilmember Harper stated that in conversation with Mr. Messi prior to the meeting, it is apparent that Toll Brothers has some problems with the timing of some of the items in the amended Settlement Agreement. In response to Council's concerns about whether the Brown Act would be violated if a Council committee made decisions without benefit of a public hearing, Mr. Montes stated that there would be a problem if decisions were made to change conditions of approval; however, with a limited scope of solving problems as they arise on a daily basis, and by working with staff to finalize the language of the amendment to the Settlement Agreement, there should be no violation of the law. Councilmember Harper suggested that the Mayor be authorized to sign the amended Settlement Agreement pending final language review by the City Attorney and the concurrence of staff. Mr. Montes stated that to the extent that there are changes or issues in the field, there should be a requirement expressly stated in the amended Settlement Agreement that a signature from the City Manager or the City Engineer authorizing the deviation from the approved plans is required. The Council concurred and indicated that there should be no verbal approvals. Mayor Hunter stated that the developer is to be held accountable without placing the residents in the middle of the dispute; that he was comfortable with the Council direction made on July 21St in regard to the number of building permits; and asked staff if there is anything in the amended Settlement Agreement that violates the Council direction to build Phase 1 containing the 95 lots. Mr. Kueny responded that in the terms of the amendment to the Settlement Agreement there is no violation to the Council's direction; however, the staff l.' •.r v .:o �� w Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 23 August 21, 2002 recommendation is that no more building permits be issued until the amended Settlement Agreement is signed. Councilmember Millhouse suggested that the homes under construction and those pending in plan review, which together total 54, should be allowed to move forward while the amended Settlement Agreement is under consideration; and then upon signing of the amendment to the Settlement Agreement, proceed with the remainder of the 95 units. He concurred with Councilmember Harper that a Council committee, working with the applicant and staff, would ensure that the timeline for consideration of plans moves forward in a reasonable manner. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved to: 1) Create an Ad Hoc Committee to meet with Toll Brothers and the City on subjects not requiring a public hearing; 2) Authorize 54 building permits to the developer; 3) Effectuate amendment to the Settlement Agreement within the next 10 -days in meetings with the Ad Hoc Committee, the developer, and City staff, to return to the Council at the next regular meeting; and 4) Issue the remaining building permits up to the 95 units in Phase 1, upon the execution of the second amendment to the Settlement Agreement. A discussion followed between Council and staff which focused on whether the amended Settlement Agreement needs to come back to the Council for approval; and the option to include timelines where the City is the sole decision maker. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Lowe stated that Toll Brothers would be comfortable with that motion; however, he reiterated his discomfort with the one provision regarding the conditions dealing with Walnut Canyon Road. The motion was tabled to allow Council and staff to discuss the Walnut Canyon Road improvement issue. A discussion followed regarding Item 6. of Attachment No. 2; and it was Mr. Kueny's recommendation that the Minor Modification return to the Council as a separate issue to allow time for the Community Development Director to conduct research to make sure Toll Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 24 Auqust 21, 2002 Brothers' improvements to Walnut Canyon Road interface with those being made by the West Pointe development. Councilmember Millhouse withdrew his prior motion. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion: 1) Appoint Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Millhouse to serve on an Ad Hoc Committee to consider the amended Settlement Agreement Minor Modification No. 3 and the Walnut Canyon Road condition; 2) Allow a maximum of 54 building permits until the second amendment to the Settlement Agreement is signed; 3) Develop a City Performance Criterion to be included in the amended Settlement Agreement; and 4) Issue the remaining building permits up to the 95 units in Phase 1, upon the execution of the second amendment to the Settlement Agreement. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Discussion followed regarding the golf cart use, and it was decided that the issue would be covered within the items to be considered by the Ad Hoc Committee. D. Adopt Resolution Approving the Funding of Consultant Services Required to Consider Formation of a New Citywide Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District (AD03 -1). Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1993, approving an appropriation from the General Fund Reserve to fund the subject efforts. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -1993, approving an appropriation from the General Fund Reserve to fund the subject efforts. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. E. Consider Funding for Fifth Grade D.A.R.E. Program. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mayor Hunter stated that due to budget curtailments the Moorpark Unified School District has been forced to eliminate their portion of contribution towards the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 25 Auqust 21, 2002 funding for the Fifth Grade D.A.R.E. officer; and the City would need to contribute 1000 of the funding if the program is to continue. He outlined the benefits of the program in preventing alcohol and drug abuse among children; and stated that there are sufficient funds in the City's budget to contribute the $36,000. Councilmember Millhouse cited recent crime statistics and commended Captain LeMay and his officers on the decline in crime and the city of Moorpark's continued ranking as the safest city in the County of Ventura. He offered his support for the continuance of the D.A.R.E. program. Michael Cosenza, a Moorpark resident and a teacher at Flory school, spoke in support of the program as teaching valuable lessons and for giving children the opportunity to develop a rapport with the D.A.R.E. officer. Melissa Nizdil, a Moorpark resident and local teacher, spoke in support of the D.A.R.E. program as essential to the education of the youth in Moorpark. Gerald Goldstein, a Moorpark opposition to the continued fund: Public Radio's broadcasts ineffectiveness of the D.A.R.E. his own concerns regarding the having law enforcement on campus. resident, spoke in Lng and cited National reporting on the program; and stated negative impacts of MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the allocation of funds from the current budget to fund the fifth grade D.A.R.E. Program. Councilmember Harper stated that when he was a member of the School Board a study was performed on the advocacy of the D.A.R.E. program and the results were mixed; regardless, it is a very popular program with the community; and it does make children more comfortable in talking with law enforcement. Councilmember Mikos stated that she has attended some of the D.A.R.E. program graduations where students have read poignant essays about their participation, and she is in support of continuing the funding. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 26 August 21, 2002 The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. 11. CONSENT CALENDAR: Councilmember Wozniak requested the minutes from the Special Meeting of July 17, 2002, be pulled from Item 11.A. for individual consideration. Councilmember Mikos requested the minutes from the Special Meeting of July 10, 2002, be pulled from Item 11.A. for individual consideration. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of the July 10 and July 17, 2002, minutes in Item 11.A. and Items ll.F. and 11.L., which were pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of June 19, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2001 -2002 - August 21, 2002. Manual Warrants Voided Warrants Payroll Liability Warrants 110074 109920 & 110010 & 110033 109853 - 109860 $ 4, 586.24 $(15,941.22) $ 13,712.97 Regular Warrants 109871 - 110053 & $1,297,722.90 110188 - 110229 & $ 295,533.48 110351 - 110374 $ 6,908.63 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 27 August 21, 2002 C. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - August 21, 2002. Manual Warrants Payroll Liability Warrants 109744 - 109747 & 109861 - 109862 & 110075 - 110079 & 110230 - 110232 109863 - 109870 & 110080 - 110087 & 110233 - 110240 $ 240,522.47 $ 2,116.46 $13,713.76 $13,975.90 $ 13,678.37 Regular Warrants 110054 - 110073 & $ 15,930.70 110088 - 110187 & $182,445.89 110241 - 110350 $ 26,356.74 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. D. Ventura Council of Governments Revised Joint Powers Agreement. Staff Recommendation: Ratify the revised Joint Powers Agreement. E. Consider Adoption of Resolution Pursuant to Public Hearing Held July 17, 2002, for Tax Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Related to Vintage Crest Senior Apartments (GPA 2002 -01, ZC 2002 -01, RPD 2002- 02_) , on Application by USA Properties Fund, Inc. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2002 -1994. G. Adopt Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget by Establishing Project 8049 for Consultant Services Required to Investigate the Feasibility and Cost Related to the Possible Establishment of a Prohibition or Restriction of Non -Local Truck Traffic on Route 118 Between the Route 23 Freeway and Route 34. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- 1995, approving an appropriation and budget amendment to fund the subject consultant services. H. Consider Quarterly Treasurer's Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file Quarterly Treasurer's Report. I. Consider Adoption of a Resolution of Intent Directing the Planning Commission to Hold a Public Hearing and Provide a Recommendation on a General Plan Amendment Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 28 August 21, 2002 Related to Ac Recommendation: the Planning amendments to Plan, and pr Council. Iriculture /Residential Setbacks. Staff Adopt Resolution 2002 -1996, directing Commission to study appropriate the Land Use Element of the General Dvide a recommendation to the City J. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Directing the Planning Commission to Hold a Public Hearing and Provide a Recommendation on Zoning Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 17.20 (Uses by Zone), 17.28 (Standards for Specific Uses), 17.44 (Entitlement - Process and Procedures), 17.60 (Amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plans, Zoning Map and Zoning Code), and 17.68 (Public Notice). Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2002 -1997, directing the Planning Commission to study revisions to the Zoning Code concerning entitlement permit processing, and provide a recommendation to the City Council. K. Consider Appointment of New Building Official. Staff Recommendation: Approve the appointment of Ray Young as the City's Building Official under the Charles Abbott & Associates contract. M. Consider Setting a Public Hearing to Receive Testimony to Update the City's Library Facilities Fee. Staff Recommendation: Set a Public Hearing date of September 18, 2002, to receive testimony on updating the City's Library Facilities Fee. The following items were pulled for individual consideration: 11. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of July 10, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. Councilmember Mikos stated that she had not been present at the meeting of July 10, 2002. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the minutes of Special Meeting of July 10, 2002. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, with Councilmember Mikos abstaining. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 29 August 21, 2002 Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of July 17, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. Councilmembers Harper and Wozniak stated that they were not present at the Special Meeting of July 17, 2002. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to approve the minutes of Special Meeting of July 10, 2002. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, with Councilmembers Harper and Wozniak abstaining. F. Consider Request from Moorpark Kiwanis to Waive Park Rental Fees for Softball Tournament. Staff Recommendation: Approve the request from Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees associated with their Girls Softball Tournament, provided that they pay all direct costs incurred by the City, including one staff person dedicated to the Tournament. Councilmember Millhouse stated that he had this item pulled to highlight this tournament as a very worthwhile activity. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos moved to approve the request from Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. L. Consider Rescinding Approval for Agreements with Southern California Edison Concerning the Unimproved Road at Arroyo Vista Community Park and Signs and Banners. Staff Recommendation: Rescind prior approval for the following agreements with Southern California Edison: November 17, 1999, Lease Agreement with Southern California Edison regarding the unimproved road at AVCP and April 5, 2000, License Agreement for placement of signs and banners on ornamental street lights. Councilmember Millhouse stated that he pulled this item to acknowledge the new representative, Glen Becerra, from Southern California Edison, who is sensitive to the needs of city government, as he is a Councilmember from the City of Simi Valley. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 30 August 21, 2002 Councilmember Millhouse continued by stating his concurrence with staff's recommendation to rescind Council's actions regarding the signs and banners; however, in light of the new representative from Edison, he does not believe the statement contained on page 380 in the second paragraph where staff does not believe any attempt to gain a signed license agreement for the road at AVCP, is accurate any longer, and efforts should be made to explore this subject. Mr. Kueny stated that Southern California Edison has almost completed their grading; it would be nice if they paid the City for back rent for the months of use; and concurred that staff could wait to have Council rescind the lease agreement for the road to allow time for Councilmember Millhouse to work with Southern California Edison, but that it may not be needed due to progress on construction. The Council concurred that Councilmember Millhouse would work with Southern California Edison and that the lease agreement for the road could be dealt with when he reports back. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to rescind the prior approval for the License Agreement with Southern California Edison for placement of signs and banners on ornamental street lights. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. ORDINANCES: None. 13. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny requested that the City Council go into closed session for discussion of Items 13.B (three cases), 13.F., and 13.G. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion of Items 13.B. (three cases), 13.F., and 13.G. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 11:45 p.m. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 31 August 21, 2002 B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 10) F. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 504 -0- 021 -195, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Joe Fedele Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment G. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: APN 506 -0- 042 -015, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager Negotiation Parties: The City of Moorpark and Bert and Placide Curts Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, and Parvin, and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director (left the meeting at 12:03 a.m.); Barry Hogan, Community Development Director (arrived at 12:03 a.m.); and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. The Council reconvened into open session at 12:20 a.m., August 22, 2003. Mr. Kueny stated that Items 13.B. (three cases), 13.F., and 13.G. were discussed and that there was no action to report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 32 August 21, 2002 13. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 12:20 a.m., August 22, 2002. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California May 7, 2003 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on May 7, 2003, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:58 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Joseph Montes, City Attorney, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Kenneth Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Cynthia Borchard, Administrative Services Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Richard Diaz, Sheriff's Department; Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Certificate of Recognition to Ventura County Sheriff's Department K -9 Handler Team for the Year 2002. Mayor Hunter announced that Senior Deputy Matthew DelaHuerta and his canine, Alf were unable to attend the meeting and the presentation will be rescheduled. B. Certificate of Recognition to the 2003 Moorpark Rotary Club Officer of the Year. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 May 7, 2003 Mayor Hunter asked Captain Diaz to join him in presenting the Certificate of Recognition to Deputy Damian Alvarez. Captain Diaz introduced Deputy Alvarez's fellow officers present in the audience who served as part of the selection panel for this recognition. Deputy Alvarez thanked the Council and all the officers with whom he works and stated how much he loves working in the city of Moorpark. C. Certificate of Recognition to California Young Mother of the Year. Mayor Hunter presented the Certificate of Recognition to Jana Ewing. Ms. Ewing thanked the Council and the city of Moorpark for their endorsement of all of the activities in the community that focus on families. She reported on her recent trip to Washington, D.C. where she represented the Mothers of California at the National American Mothers, Inc. convention. Ms. Ewing stated that this year, National American Mothers, Inc. is taking on the "War against Pornography." She asked the Council and the City for support in this battle. D. Proclamation Acknowledging May 2003 as Veteran Appreciation Month. Mayor Hunter presented the Proclamation to former Councilmember and Marine Corps Veteran, John Wozniak. Mr. Wozniak thanked the Council on behalf of all Veterans and encouraged employment of veterans. E. Proclamation Acknowledging May 2003 as Arthritis Month. Mayor Hunter presented the Proclamation to Arthritis Foundation Board Member, Ella Cranny. Ms. Cranny thanked the Council and went on to describe the number of infants, children, and teenagers in Ventura County who are afflicted with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 May 7, 2003 F. Proclamation Acknowledging May 2003 as "Stay and Play in Ventura County" Month. Mayor Hunter presented the Proclamation to Margaret Travers, Chair of the Ventura County Tourism Collaborative. Ms. Travers thanked the Council and described the efforts of the Collaborative to stimulate economic growth by promoting the hospitality industry and cultural amenities in Ventura County. She reported that the next issue of the Ventura County Insider will showcase opportunities for leisure and recreational activities in Ventura County. Ms. Travers complimented city employee, Julie Hernandez, a member of the Collaborative, for arranging a meeting at the Secret Garden Restaurant, followed by a tour of the Theater on High Street, which proved to provide two more destinations of note in Ventura County. G. Proclamation Acknowledging May 18th to May 24th as National Public Works Week. Mayor Hunter presented the Proclamation to Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director. Mr. Gilbert thanked the Council and stated that the Public Works Department and its employees are an essential asset to the Moorpark Community since they enhance the quality of life by designing, building, and maintaining the infrastructure. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to convene a meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7 :19 p.m. The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:20 p.m. 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. 1-. J Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 May 7, 2003 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Millhouse, as Chair of the Ventura County Transportation Commission, reported on the following transportation issues: 1) the Highway 101 widening project, as it affects Ventura County will not entail any right -of -way concerns and public hearings on this matter have yet to be scheduled; 2) Caltrans is working on a plan to open the eastbound shoulder lane of State Route 118; 3) the Commission voted against increasing the fare for the Vista Bus Line within the County; and 4) due to Budget constraints in Sacramento, there is nothing new to report on the widening of Highway 23. Councilmember Mikos, serving on the Board of Directors of the 4th Supervisorial District's Commission on Human concerns, announced a public meeting to be held on Monday, May 12th at 5:30 p.m. in Oxnard to discuss what can be done to help the homeless and low income families become self - sufficient. She encouraged the public to email or send written comments to the Commission and referenced the City's Homepage at www.moorpark.ci.moorpark.ca.us for additional information and a survey. Councilmember Mikos announced an upcoming tour of the North Park site on May 17th beginning at 9:00 a.m. from City Hall and encouraged the public to contact the City if they wish to participate. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Consider Minor Modification No. 2 to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) No. 2001 -01 for Approval of Site Plan and Building Elevations for a 3,220 Square Foot In -N -Out Burger Drive - Through Restaurant on Pad 3 of CPD No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of In -N -Out Burger. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Direct staff to prepare a letter approving the Minor Modification No 2 to CPD 2001 -01 approving the revised site plan and building elevations. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 5 Mav 7, 2003 Mr. Hogan gave the staff report and stated that if the Council so directs, staff will add a condition to prohibit the crossed palm trees, which are considered to be the logo for In -N -Out. He supplied two additional conditions recommended by staff: 1. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for a building permit the applicant shall modify the site plan in order to provide queuing for a minimum of 18 vehicles. This may involve the reconfiguration or elimination of parking stalls that conflict with queuing area. The modification shall be to the satisfaction and approval of the Community Development Director. 2. At a time when the operation of the drive - through portion of the business has a vehicle queue in excess of 12 vehicles, the applicant shall provide one employee to direct traffic. When the queue exceeds 15 vehicles, the applicant shall provide an additional employee to direct traffic. The Community Development Director may modify this requirement to meet changing needs. A discussion followed between the Council and staff, which focused on the possibility of using angled parking rather than eliminating parking spaces; an expected vehicle queue line of 40 -plus vehicles requiring an employee to be present to direct traffic at all times; pedestrian- crossing safety issues in relationship to the vehicle queue line; whether double drive - though lanes should be considered; and whether the crossed palms are present at each In -N -Out site. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Orest Dolyniuk, of Novak & Associates, representing the applicant, 132 N. Maryland Avenue, Glendale, stated that the applicant concurs with staff's recommendations and will work with the city to resolve the queuing issues. Raymond Villanueva, of In -N -Out, 13502 Hamburger Lane, Baldwin Park, Director of Development, provided background information on In —N -Out, which has been open since 1948 and is the first drive - through restaurant in California if not the nation. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 6 May 7, 2003 In response to Council, Mr. Villanueva stated that the company moved away from the double lane drive - through when sit -down dining was added to the restaurant configuration; they have not built a new double lane drive - through in the last 15 -16 years; the single -lane handles more volume and is speedier; a redesign to accommodate 13 cars in the queue line rather than 18 cars, as recommended by staff, should be sufficient, since the cars move every 45 seconds; when a store is new, it is quite common to have associates out in the parking lot taking orders; they do not expect huge volumes at this location considering the proximity of existing restaurants in Simi Valley, Newbury Park, and Camarillo; the peak hour for vehicle stacking is at lunch time; statistics show that half the clientele prefer sit -down dining; unlike the Simi Valley location, there is reciprocal parking in the adjacent shopping center; the north side of the site is a delivery and staging area; and the most convenient location for a dining patio would be on the south side, away from the queue line. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Hogan stated that vehicles exiting the main aisle will be able to turn either left or right; the applicant's suggestion for a 13 -car queue line is problematic and it is best to be flexible to allow for up to 23 cars in the queue; moving the order window further south would require internal changes to the floor plan; and moving the stacking further south would involve the main drive aisle to Kohls, while stacking towards the north remains exclusive to the restaurant site. A discussion followed between Council, staff and the applicant, which focused on continued concerns regarding the underestimation of the volume of business and the resulting vehicle - queuing problem; the possibility of adding more outdoor tables; whether this store has the same number of cooking surfaces as other stores; how much landscaping would be eliminated in reconfiguring the site; and whether the palm trees should remain. In response to Council, Mr. Villanueva stated that the request to have employees outside to assist is not onerous, as they are already required to go outside Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 7 Mav 7, 2003 when stacking reaches more than 8 vehicles; this store has the same number of cooking surfaces as in Simi Valley; and the crossed palm trees are very important to the founding owners, as part of the original design based on the palms shown at the end of the old Hollywood movie "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World." Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. A discussion followed among the Councilmembers, resulting in the consensus that the condition requiring outside staffing was acceptable; the proposed condition regarding queuing should be modified to allow the applicant and staff to work together to reach a resolution; and crossed palm trees are acceptable with placement to be determined by staff. MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare a letter approving the Minor Modification No 2 to CPD 2001 -01, including the revised site plan and building elevations, after working with the applicant on ingress /egress to allow for more drive - through related vehicle stacking, additional outdoor seating, and adjustments to the landscaping to include the crossed palms in a location to be determined by the Community Development Director. Councilmember Millhouse stated he was torn between having the plan come back to the Council for approval or letting the Community Development Director work it out with the applicant. He cautioned that this is a very high profile item and care should be taken to "get it right." He encouraged staff to validate the numbers projected by the applicant by investigating data from other In -N -Out stores. Mayor Hunter stated that he will trust the applicant in projecting the numbers as they have been in business for 55 years and have a highly experienced staff. Councilmember Harper stated he trusts Mr. Hogan as well. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 8 Mav 7, 2003 Councilmember Mikos asked staff to develop a backup plan to allow for additional vehicle stacking in the drive - through lane. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Approval of Site Plan and Building Elevations for a 2,260 Square Foot Del Taco Drive - Through Fast Food Restaurant on Pad 2 of Commercial Planned Development (CPD) No. 2001 -01 (Moorpark Marketplace) Located South of New Los Angeles Avenue, East of Miller Parkway and West of the SR -23 Freeway on the Application of Del Taco. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Direct staff to prepare a letter approving the Minor Modification No 1 to CPD 2001 -01 approving the revised site plan and building elevations. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Greg Nottingham, Nottingham & Associates, 506 Corte Golondrina, Camarillo, representing Del Taco, stated the applicant concurs with the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Nottingham stated that Del Taco is a sit -down restaurant more than a drive - through and they typically have only five to six cars in the queue at the drive - through window. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare a letter approving the Minor Modification No 1 to CPD 2001 -01 approving the revised site plan and building elevations. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 8:24 p.m. The Council meeting reconvened at 8:36 p.m. 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider the 2003 Legislative Program. (Continued from April 16, 2003) Staff Recommendation: Adopt the 2003 Legislative Program. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 9 May 7, 2003 Mr. Riley gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adopt the 2003 Legislative Program. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Revising Terms of CalHome Mobilehome Rehabilitation Loan Program. Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize a revision to the Promissory Note to provide 0% interest to low and very low income borrowers and forgiveness of the loan at the end of the term, providing the mobilehome is still occupied by the original owner; and 2) Extend these terms to mobilehome residents who have already signed loan documents for this program by substituting a New Promissory Note for their original Note. Ms. Burns gave the staff report. In response to Council, Ms. Burns stated that the program could be changed from 15 years to 10 years, although that is a shorter time for mobilehome residents to make needed repairs; whether the loan comes due, the owner transfers title, or the owner passes away, the lien would have to be paid; transferring the loan obligation to an heir is not part of the program; mobilehome owners are being notified of the program at Homeowners Association meetings and by circulating flyers; and the funds are strictly State money used by the City for this program. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. A discussion followed among the Councilmembers, which focused on researching whether the program could be restructured and still qualify under State guidelines if the loan were transferred without payment of fees, to an immediate family member who meets the same low income qualifications and who would reside in the mobilehome; if the loan were transferred without paying fees to an immediate family member who would reside in the mobilehome, but who does not qualify as Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 10 May 7, 2003 low income; and if the loan program could be shortened to 10 years with forgiveness at six years. Mr. Kueny suggested that staff could either return with this item after researching the suggestions to see if they comply with State regulations or if Council directs, could change the program to allow the transfer to an heir to the extent permitted by the State. Councilmembers Harper and Mikos stated that they preferred that the heir meet the low- income qualifications. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to: 1) Authorize a revision to the Promissory Note to provide 0% interest for a ten (10)- year term to low and very low income borrowers and to begin forgiveness of the loan at the end of year six (6) at 200 per year through year 10, providing the mobilehome is still occupied by the original owner or successor heir who resides in the unit, in compliance will all State regulations; and 2) Extend these terms to mobilehome residents who have already signed loan documents for this program by substituting a New Promissory Note for their original Note. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Establishment of the Speed Law Outreach Workeffort (SLOW) Program. Staff Recommendation: Approve the implementation of the SLOW program, as described in the program description contained in the agenda report. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. He corrected the recommendation in the staff report to add that the Transportation and Streets Committee also recommends approval of the SLOW Program. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Captain Diaz stated that identifiable uniforms and vehicles will be used by the Citizen's Patrol; informative letters will be addressed to the registered owners of the offending vehicles; and citizens will be instructed to respond directly to him. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 May 7, 2003 In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Gilbert stated that a similar program has been effective in Santa Barbara. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the implementation of the SLOW program, as described in the program description contained in the agenda report. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Consider Possible Action to Change the Name of Certain City Street Segments (Los Angeles Avenue east of High Street, New Los Angeles Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue east of Collins Drive). Staff Recommendation: 1) Direct staff to schedule a public meeting to consider changing the names for street Segment C (Los Angeles Avenue east of High Street) , and to mail a notice of such meeting to all affected properties, emergency response agencies and utilities; and 2) Direct staff to meet with officials of the City of Simi Valley to discuss a coordinated effort to change the name of Segment E as defined in the agenda report. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. He stated that late correspondence from Kavlico Company had been received and, if so directed, can be made a part of the public record. A discussion followed between the Council and staff, which focused on the name change from the State Route 118 freeway to High Street; meetings to be held with other entities; and the need for a phased approach to allow businesses time to change addresses on letterhead, business cards, and advertising. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Mayor Hunter stated that he supports staff's recommendation; a 13 -month phased approach would allow companies to accommodate address changes on a fiscal year basis; and these street names have caused confusion which has impacted the revitalization of the downtown area. G. A--N '-" -• � Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 12 May 7, 2003 Councilmember Harper stated that this confusion in street names is also a safety issue for emergency response vehicles, and acknowledged that there will be resistance from affected business owners. Councilmember Parvin stated that she supports the recommendation for a time period prior to changing the street names to allow businesses, such as Kavlico, which is the second largest manufacturing company in the County, to deal with the cost of the changes. Councilmember Mikos stated that she supports the recommendation, especially the one for High Street, as it will be good for downtown revitalization to have an identifiable freeway exit to High Street; the other name changes will be harder, but should be explored; and it will be necessary to work with Kavlico for a smooth transition. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to: 1) Schedule a public meeting to consider changing the names for street Segment C (Los Angeles Avenue east of High Street), and to mail a notice of such meeting to all affected properties, emergency response agencies and utilities; and 2) Direct staff to meet with officials of the City of Simi Valley to discuss a coordinated effort to change the name of Segment E as defined in the agenda report. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. E. Consider Resolution Renaming Paul E. Griffin Park and Approve the Park Naming Policy Revisions. Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2077, renaming Paul E. Griffin Park to College View Park; and 2) Approve the revised Park Naming Policy, and direct staff to add the newly approved policy to the Council Policies. Ms. Lindley gave the staff report. Councilmember Mikos suggested that the Park Naming Policy verbiage be modified to allow a prominent local or regional area figure from the unincorporated area near Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 13 Mav 7, 2003 Mayor Hunter concurred and recommended changing the words "City of Moorpark" to "local." In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2077, renaming Paul E. Griffin Park to College View Park; and 2) Approve the revised Park Naming Policy, as amended, with direction to staff to add the newly approved policy to the next update of the Council Policies Resolution. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -1, Councilmember Millhouse dissenting. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Adjourned Meeting of January 23, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - Mav 7, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant Payroll Liability Warrants 112509 - 112511 112181 & 112303 & 112508 & 112623 & 112626 112611 - 112615 $ 363,898.17 $ (944.00) $ 2,552.49 Regular Warrants 112512 - 112610 & $ 83,184.18 112616 - 112722 $ 712,460.11 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 Implementation Proposals. Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt the recommended infrastructure capitalization threshold of $100,000 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 May 7, 2003 and fixed asset (equipment) capitalization threshold of $5,000 effective July 1, 2002; 2) Approve the use of the standard depreciation reporting method for the entire infrastructure of the City upon adoption of the New Report Model; 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Harris & Associates subject to final language approval by the City Attorney and City Manager not to exceed $24,990; 4) Accept the proposal from Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP, for assistance in implementation of GASB 34 in accordance with their current hourly rates not to exceed $20,000; and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2078 amending the Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget to revise the amount of funding for this project per the agenda report. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED D. Consider Resolution Declaration Prepared Spring Road Widening Angeles Avenue. Resolution No. 200 Negative Declaration Road Widening. Adopting the Mitigated Negative on Behalf of Project No. 8026: Between Flinn Avenue and New Los Staff Recommendation: Adopt 3 -2079, adopting the Mitigated for Project No. 8026: Spring E. Consider Resolution Approving the Engineer's Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2080, approving the Engineer's Report and setting June 4, 2003, as the date of a public hearing to consider the levy of assessments for FY 2003/04. F. Consider Award of Contract for the Construction of the Flinn Avenue Realignment Project (Project 8037) and Adoption of a Resolution Amending Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget to Revise the Funding for Said Project. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the award of a contract to Nativ Engineering, Inc. for the construction of the subject project; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2081. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED G. Consider Resolution Amending Fiscal Year 2002/2003 Budget for the 2003 Asphalt Overlay Project (Project 8011) and Approval of the Award of a Contract for the Construction of Said Project. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the award of a construction contract to Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 May 7, 2003 Ruiz Engineer Company; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2082. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED H. Consider Bond Reduction and Bond Exoneration for Parcel Map 5242 (Moorpark Partners, LLC) , Located at the Intersection of Mountain Trail Street and Tierra Rejada Road. Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize the City Clerk to reduce surety #127307 to 100, for a total of $3,684; 2) Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate Grading Security Deposit in the amount of $3,085.06; and 3) Authorize the City Clerk to fully exonerate surety #127307 for Parcel Map 5242 one year after this approval of the reduction of surety bond, and upon written confirmation from the City Engineer that no warranty work is required. I. Consider Rejection of Claim: Amanda Zopfi. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. J. Consider Initiation of Amendment to California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) Contract. Staff Recommendation: Direct Staff to schedule City Council consideration of adoption of a CalPERS contract amendment consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 20903. K. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of a Ventura County Area Agency on Aging Grant Application for Older Americans Act and Older Californians Act Funds and Authorizing City Manager to Sign All Related Agreements. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2083. L. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of a Ventura County Area Agency on Aging Grant Application for Older Americans Act Title III B Funds for Senior Center Support and Authorizing City Manager to Sign All Related Agreements. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2084. M. Consider the Setting of a Special Joint City Council/ Planning Commission /Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting to Tour the North Park Specific Plan Project Site (General Plan Amendment No. 2001 -05, Specific Plan No. 2001 -01 and Zone Change No. 2001 -02 and the Moorpark Hiahlands Specific Plan Protect Site (General Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 16 May 7, 2003 Plan Amendment No. 1999 -01, Zone Change No. 1999 -01, Specific Plan No. 1995 -02, Residential Planned Development No. 2002 -01, Tentative Tract Map No. 5045). Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to schedule a Special Joint City Council /Planning Commission /Parks and Recreation Commission meeting to tour the North Park Specific Plan project site and the Moorpark Highlands Specific Plan project site for Saturday, May 17, 2003, to begin at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. 11. ORDINANCES: None. 12. CLOSED SESSION: None was held. 13. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn. The time was 9:28 p.m. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California June 18, 2003 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on June 18, 2003, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:56 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Attorney, Joseph Montes, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Cynthia Borchard, Administrative Services Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Sergeant Mike Aranda, Sheriff's Department; Scott Wolfe, Principal Planner; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Presentation of Certificates to Miss Teen Moorpark 2003 and Miss Moorpark 2003. Mayor Hunter presented Certificates of Recognition to Serena Deverich, Miss Teen Moorpark 2003, and Hilary Gushwa, Miss Moorpark 2003. B. City Manager's Monthly Report. Mr. Kueny gave the monthly report. He thanked City staff for their excellent work throughout the past fiscal year and as they move forward to celebrate the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 2 June 18, 2003 City's 20th Anniversary. Mr. Kueny highlighted some of the Top Ten Priorities for the next fiscal year, including construction of the new City Hall., Corporate Yard Facility, and the Police Station; updates to the General Plan Land Use, Circulation, and OSCAR (Open Space, Conservation and Recreation) Elements; widening various segments of Los Angeles Avenue throughout the City; and the construction of the Human Services Complex. Councilmember Mikos congratulated the City Council and staff for making the Human Services Complex one of the Top Ten Priorities for next fiscal year and also, for finally adding improvements to East Los Angeles Avenue to the Top Ten Priorities. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: Margarita Riley, Executive Assistant for the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra, 7075 Campus Park Road, Moorpark, announced that with additional funds, Beethoven's Symphony No. 9 can be performed by the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra at the Oxnard Performing Arts Center. Dr. Alvin Miller, member of the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra, 7075 Campus Park Road, Moorpark, stated that the orchestra is a vehicle for interested youth in the community to play in an ensemble. He invited the community to attend and enjoy concerts at Moorpark College and reiterated Ms. Riley's solicitation for funds for the Beethoven concert. Margaret Travers, Executive Director of the Ventura County Arts Council, 646 County Square Drive, Ventura, spoke about the city of Moorpark's outstanding resources, such as Moorpark College and the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra. She stated it would be wonderful if the City could support the Beethoven concert. James Song, Director of the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra, 7075 Campus Park Road, Moorpark, thanked the Council for their past support. He spoke about Beethoven's accomplishment in composing Symphony No. 9 even though he was deaf; and requested financial support to make the 180th anniversary celebration of this piece of music possible. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 3 June 18. 2003 Mayor Hunter stated that the request for funds would need to be considered by the Budget and Finance Committee. Councilmember Harper stated that this request for funds could possibly be discussed during the budget approval on this agenda. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to convene a meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7:13 p.m. The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:16 p.m. 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: None. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Millhouse announced that the city of Moorpark is once again ranked as the safest city in Ventura County; and stated this is a testament to the greatness of the community. Councilmember Millhouse requested a future agenda item to reconsider the decision made at the June 4, 2003, City Council meeting in regard to left -turn egress from the GreeneWay project onto Spring Road, to allow for the possibility of adopting a time restriction for left -turns during peak traffic times, and suggested from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and then again from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., rather than a full restriction of left turns. He stated that the City Attorney has advised that this reconsideration may have to be a public hearing with the proper notification provided. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to agendize for August 20, 2003, after public notice, if required, the reconsideration of left -turn egress onto Spring Road from the GreeneWay Development, Inc. project CPD 2002 -01, which was heard at the June 4, 2003, City Council meeting. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -1, Councilmember Mikos dissenting. Councilmember Parvin requested a future agenda item for a comprehensive presentation of the requirements and resources available to assist the public in appealing a Code Enforcement decision. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 June 18, 2003 Mayor Hunter invited residents of Moorpark to attend the July 2nd City Council meeting where the City's 20th Anniversary will be celebrated with a reception. Mayor Hunter announced the July 3rd Fireworks Extravaganza to be held at Arroyo Vista Community Park from 4 -9:00 p.m. including live entertainment with Ronny and the Classics, Starship, Ed McMahon, sky diving, and fireworks to begin at 9:00 P.M. Mayor Hunter announced the After Dark Dance for teens in grades 6th through 9th at Arroyo Vista Recreation Center on July 11th from 7 -10:00 p.m. Mayor Hunter announced Camp for ages 12 throul trips to destinations movies, and favorite Additional information Vista Recreation Center 8. PUBLIC HEARING: that registration for Teen Travel 3h 15 is $110.00 per week for daily such as amusement parks, malls, hangouts within Ventura County. is available by calling the Arroyo at 517 -6300. A. Consider Minor Modification No. 3 to Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 5133, Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue West of Fremont Street, on the Application of Shea Homes. Staff Recommendations: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Minor Modification No. 3 to RPD No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to VTTM No. 5133 subject to Conditions of Approval. Mr. Hogan stated that the applicant is requesting a continuance of this item to the July 2, 2003, meeting to allow time to continue to work with staff on issues. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Phil Culler, representing Shea Homes, 555 St. Charles Street, Suite 205, Thousand Oaks, stated he was available for questions. ✓ �/�J �JW Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 June 18, 2003 Ro K. Hawkinson, a Moorpark resident, expressed concerns about a potential recreational development associated with the Shea project, which would create a parking problem on Fremont Street. Mark Patton, a Moorpark resident, expressed concerns regarding water drainage onto his property due to changes in grading elevations for this project; and the need for a sound wall to be installed to block noise from the increased traffic behind his home. Dominic Schmidt, a Moorpark resident and member of the volunteer Fremont Homeowners Association, thanked Shea Homes for meeting with the neighborhood to answer questions; urged the City Council to consider the potential for a signalized intersection at Millard Street and Los Angeles Avenue as a positive change for his neighborhood; and asked the Council to take action on this project without changing the nature of Fremont Street in any major way. Monica Welikala, a Moorpark resident, expressed concerns regarding impacts to adjacent properties due to the pounding needed to compact the soil for this project site; asked that an 8 -foot privacy wall be considered for adjacent properties; and asked when Fremont Street will be blocked off from access to Los Angeles Avenue by a proposed wall. Steve Mercado, a Moorpark resident, also expressed concerns about drainage problems and the need for a sound wall. He asked if future phases of the Shea project could include a locked gate for exclusive use by Fremont Street residents to allow continued access to nearby stores. Ronald Schnoebelen, a Moorpark resident, asked if the new wall to be installed by Shea could be placed in the same location as the existing four -foot fencing and also between each garage to eliminate the concern that litter will become trapped between the old and new fencing. Mayor Hunter directed staff to be prepared to respond to these concerns at the July 2, 2003, meeting. V /� >W✓ Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 6 June 18, 2003 MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to continue this item with public hearing open, to July 2, 2003. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Adoption of a Resolution Declaring the Private Roads within Residential Planned Development (RPD) 2002 -02 (USA Properties) to be Subject to the Provisions of the California Vehicle Code. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2099. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2099. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Resolution Adopting an Operating and Capital Improvements Budget for the City of Moorpark for the Fiscal Year 2003/2004. (continued from May 28, 2003) Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2100. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. He stated that staff concurs with Mayor Hunter that any decision regarding a contribution to the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra be referred to the Budget and Finance Committee for consideration, especially since impacts to the City's budget, from the yet to be adopted State budget, are not known. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that other than continuing to let the State Legislature know of the impacts to the City's budget, there is nothing the public or city government can do that has not already been done; the inability of the State to pay State salaries would not affect the City's payroll; staff does not recommend paying Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 June 18, 2003 overtime costs for police personnel to participate in Neighborhood Night Out; and the funds would be better allocated to provide for a portable generator to be used as an emergency backup system at the Police Station. Mayor Hunter expressed frustration at the State's inability to adopt a State budget without transferring funds from cities and counties that have already made the necessary, difficult budget cutting decisions. He stated that the State budget process is antiquated and beyond remedy. Councilmember Millhouse stated that it that citizens do not know how the State dollars to spend and provide programs legislators are not held accountable; take a referendum to remedy the deadlc making on the State budget. Councilmember Mikos stated $1 paid in property taxes keeps; and she encouraged State Congressman to act budget. is unfortunate uses their tax irresponsibly; and it might >ck in decision that 7'-i� cents out of every is all the local community the public to email their to balance and pass the A discussion followed among the Councilmembers and staff focusing on the enhancement of positive relationships between residents, police, and fire department personnel fostered by Neighborhood Night Out; ideas for reducing the cost of the event; the actual number of participating neighborhoods; using on -duty personnel rather than paying overtime; and the possibility of the generator being donated, which would be tax deductible. It was the majority opinion of the Council to continue the Neighborhood Night Out for the coming year with efforts to streamline the costs. Mr. Kueny stated that staff will find another way to supply a portable emergency generator to the Police Station. A discussion followed among the Councilmembers and staff concerning support for the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra's request for financial assistance; the huge r- Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 June 18, 2003 undertaking of coordinating such an event requiring the need for additional funds; and whether or not the symphony could wait until after the approval of the State budget and a subsequent meeting of the City's Budget and Finance Committee. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to take the Moorpark Symphony Orchestra's request for financial assistance for the Beethoven's' No. 9 Symphony event under consideration at the first September meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2100, as amended, to continue the Neighborhood Night Out Event. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. B. Consider Replanting Plan for High Street Pepper Trees. Staff Recommendation: Approve the removal of the 6 Pepper trees on High Street with a hazard rating of 9, and direct staff to develop a replanting plan for the 6 trees as well as a removal and replanting plan for the 18 trees with a hazard rating of 8. Ms. Lindley gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Ms. Lindley stated that staff is aware of the electrical wires entwined in some of the Pepper trees; and undergrounding of electrical lines is a future consideration for High Street. A discussion followed among the Councilmembers and staff focusing on the need for a second arborist's opinion; the cost of cabling; alternatives to cabling; researching other cities' techniques for saving old trees; and the importance of involving the public and the Moorpark Historical Society in a discussion to save the trees. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 9 June 18, 2003 CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to continue the item to August 20, 2003, to allow time to obtain the opinion from a second arborist. C. Consider Approval of the Arroyo Simi Trail Study. Staff Recommendation: Approve the subject Study and forward a copy of same to Ventura County Transportation Commission with a request that they consider becoming the lead agency for the development of funding sources and conceptual designs for one or more projects required to implement the objectives outlined in the Study. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. He corrected the dollar amount of Item 4. on stamped page 60 of the agenda report to reflect a total of $12,000. Mr. Gilbert introduced Mike Sherrod from RRM Design Group who prepared the Arroyo Simi Trail Feasibility Study. Mr. Sherrod gave a presentation of the proposal identifying the project team, project study area and context, feasibility study purpose, trail route identification process, near- and long -term trail routes, and plans for the future. Mr. Gilbert stated that this report prepared by the consultant is a 'show to" book on the steps necessary to achieve the objective; the trails can be developed, especially along the existing levee maintenance roads; however, there are many funding questions dealing with maintenance, liability, security, and interaction with the Flood Control District; and jurisdictional issues remain in regard to the City of Simi Valley, Simi Valley Parks and Recreational District, the Flood Control District, and various regulatory agencies and habitat organizations. He also stated that staff recommends enlisting the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) as an umbrella agency to work with all the entities involved to pursue a sub - regional system. Councilmember Mikos stated that State laws make the liability concerns perceived by the public to be less than anticipated and she would prefer exploring what the city of Moorpark can do prior to handing the project off to the VCTC. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 June 18, 2003 Mr. Sherrod cited Appendix C in the Feasibility Study as providing information contained in the California Land Use statutes regarding liability; and noted that the Rails and Trails Conservancy has prepared a document on the real and perceived liabilities for trails. Mr. Hogan stated that in regard to recommendations from the consultant for the Bicycle Transportation Plan, Circulation Element Update, and the Recreation Element Update, the Community Development Department is not expected to begin that effort until late 2004. He concurred with the staff report's recommendation to delay acting on the Environmental Impact Report until those projects are completed. In response to Councilmember Mikos' concern that it might be more appropriate to further develop the project design prior to turning the trail plan over to the VCTC, Mr. Hogan stated it might be best to wait and explore further, the funding and priorities of the trail plan. In response to Councilmember Mikos' concern regarding the endangered bird cited in the trail location component of the study, Mr. Sherrod stated that if this document is adopted tonight, it can be used later as a foundation document when the EIR is performed. Councilmember Harper stated that the report is complete and well done; however, he was surprised by the cost, and asked if there is a possibility for a budget model. In response to Councilmember Harper's suggestion that the levee road is already used as a defacto trail, Mr. Sherrod stated that the cost of development can be reduced by using existing levee roads with the added requirement of a paved surface, development of a Class 1 Facility per the CalTrans Guidelines, and the placement of some kind of fencing between the levee top and the channel bottom. He further stated that to get started, a "bare bones" facility could be designed in coordination with the Flood Control District. Councilmember Parvin stated that she concurs with staff's recommendation to submit the study to VCTC to Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 June 18, 2003 communicate the goals and objectives and to get their assistance early. Councilmember Millhouse concurred with Councilmember Parvin and stated that identifying potential funding sources can be done ahead of time and the application submitted now. Mr. Sherrod recommended continuing to write grant applications, and that being creative in seeking funds is essential for success. Councilmember Mikos stated that when she served on the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee, if you did not have a Bicycle Transportation Plan in place, it was not worth applying for grants; she does not disagree with communicating to let the VCTC know of the plans by sharing this report; however, she is not ready to give the task of developing the conceptual design over to them and let the City lose control. She recommended completing the easy tasks first, like the documentation for the Bicycle Transportation Plan, so that when the Arroyo is widened, Moorpark will be in the best position to make the trails happen. Mr. Gilbert stated that it would not be wise to develop the levee trail until the improvements to the flood control channel have been accomplished; the consultant has provided the bureaucratic criteria for that development; this study was also designed to provide information on whether or not Moorpark's trails could ultimately connect with the Madera Road trail in Simi Valley, which makes this report a valuable tool; and the City could move forward at this time with putting a ramp under the Tierra Rejada bridge and work with the County to amend their design at our cost. Councilmember Millhouse suggested that only the study be forwarded to the VCTC with a request to assist in finding funding sources, since there is not a consensus for the VCTC to become the lead agency; and let staff work on the updating of the General Plan and development of conceptual designs for one or more projects. �r 1 fir' Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California PaQe 12 June 18, 2003 In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to receive and file the subject study and forward a copy of same to the VCTC with a request for the development of funding sources. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Consider Traffic Signal Coordination on Tierra Rejada Road. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the report. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter thanked staff for their assistance with this very frustrating situation. Mr. Gilbert encouraged the Council and the public to provide any feedback on the newly coordinated signals. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to receive and file the report. E. Consider Preliminary Design for the Corporation Yard Project. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the subject report, approve the preliminary design concept, approve Construction Option `A' (masonry construction with covered parking) and direct staff to work with the architect to develop options for reducing construction costs, with a report on such findings to be provided to the City Council prior to fifty percent (500) completion of the Phase 2 Conceptual Design. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Gilbert stated that on stamped page 77 of the agenda report, Item 4., is the budget completed a year ago, while Item 3. is the actual cost. He also stated Council approval would be required before including a liquid natural gas facility in the project; and if it were added, it Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 June 18, 2003 would give the option of converting vehicles in the fleet for that use. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Gilbert stated that the preferred plan for the project has covered parking located next to the building and along the northern perimeter of the site; the awnings would not need to be supported from the wall; and eliminating the covered parking as a cost cutting measure would preclude working on vehicles during adverse weather; however, he would research the cost savings. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Gilbert stated that the showers in the existing facility are not often used; however, he would need to research whether there is a safety need for such showers. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to receive and file the subject report, approve the preliminary design concept, approve Construction Option `A' (masonry construction with covered parking) and direct staff to work with the architect to develop options for reducing construction costs, with a report on such findings to be provided to the City Council prior to fifty percent (500) completion of the Phase 2 Conceptual Design. F. Consider a Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee Title by Eminent Domain Certain Real Property Owned by Benjamin Duarte Located at 296 Charles Avenue. Staff Recommendation: 1) Make the findings of public necessity as described in the agenda report; and 2) Adopt Resolution 2003 -2101, including the adoption of the Negative Declaration for the Project as prepared. 4 /5th,s ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED Mr. Riley gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Riley stated that consideration for eliminating the park in front of City Hall has not been incorporated into plans for the new City Hall, at this time. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 14 June 18, 2003 Ben Duarte, property owner of 296 Charles Street and resident of Oxnard, read a copy of a letter sent to Council the previous week in which he opposed the Resolution of Necessity to acquire his property. He cited safety concerns for children playing in a park so close to a fire station where emergency response vehicles would be traveling; the noise created by the children would adversely affect the seniors at the Senior apartments across the street; and he held up a check written as an advance to an architect for the home the Duarte family intends to build on the property. Ben J. Duarte, an Oxnard resident, stated that the architect hired by the Duarte family is seriously pursuing the construction of a home on this property and the design will be similar to the design of the Betancourt house next to this lot; the eminent domain process is being rushed; there is already a park in front of City Hall; Charles Street is not a safe location for a park due to the traffic; there are several other suitable empty lots in the neighborhood or even the empty fire station for locating a park; this location is too small and has limited parking; and the public was not consulted about what type of downtown park they would like. Cindy Hollister, a Moorpark resident, spoke in opposition to taking the property that has been in the Duarte family for years, to install a mini park, which is not a necessity. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that there is no approved plan for the park; however, it is anticipated to have landscaping and basic park amenities such as "tot lot" equipment and barbeque. In response to Councilmember Millhouse and Mayor Hunter, Ms. Lindley equated this park to that of a mini - neighborhood park similar to Campesina and Virginia Colony Parks, which are designed to specifically serve those neighborhoods. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Riley stated that this location is being considered as it is vacant property, sited within the public's view, and Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 June 18, 2003 located directly behind the new fire station, which is considered a compatible use. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Sergeant Aranda stated that there is no loitering issue in this area. Councilmember Parvin stated that Mr. Duarte' s comments regarding adverse effects on seniors is not credible, as studies show that it is beneficial for seniors to be around children. Councilmember Harper stated that it is difficult to take property away, but the owners will be fairly compensated; the property has been vacant for many years; and the neighborhood will benefit from having a downtown park that does not require crossing Moorpark Avenue. Councilmember Millhouse stated that it is very difficult to take property; however, this property is an eyesore; the owners have not done anything with the property in years; there is no recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission and he is not sure he is persuaded this is the best location for a park; he would like to see more negotiations with the property owners; and staff should return with a location study. Councilmember Mikos stated that she recognizes that no one wants their land purchased out from under them, but this is vacant land without a house. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Riley stated that this property is being considered, because the Downtown Specific Plan calls for development of parks, and specifically in this neighborhood; the site's proximity to the central part of the neighborhood is ideal; the lot is smaller than one would normally consider for building a home; and even though the Duarte's architect did call staff two to three weeks ago, they have not shared any of the construction plans or drawings with staff. Councilmember Mikos stated that she did not consider loitering to be a problem at this location and it seems ideal for a mini -park since it is protected from the busier streets and is centrally located. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 June 18, 2003 In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the lot at the end of Spring Road has already been acquired by Pardee for improvements to Spring Road and would not be available for a mini -park. Mayor Hunter stated that this location is an ideal place for a park; the playground in front of City Hall may be eliminated when City Hall is expanded; he does not like to see families crossing Moorpark Avenue to get to the City Hall playground; this is a central location; the lot has been vacant for decades and there will be no displacement of residents; and it appears to be reasonable that the public good is well served by a small neighborhood park. Councilmember Millhouse respectfully disagreed and stated he cannot make Finding No. 1. that the public interest and necessity require the construction of a park at this location; and he is concerned that this location will become a gathering place for undesirables, since the street is not well traveled or well lighted. Mayor Hunter stated that the same could be said about the location of many city parks. MOTION: Councilmember seconded a motion to: necessity as described Resolution 2003 -2101, Negative Declaration motion carried by rol. Millhouse dissenting. Harper moved and 1) Make the in the agenda r including the or the project call vote 4 -1, Councilmember Mikos findings of public eport; and 2) Adopt adoption of the as prepared. The with Councilmember G. Consider Appointment of City Council Ad Hoc Committee for Specific Plan No. 2 (Pardee). Staff Recommendation: Appoint a City Council Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper volunteered to serve on the committee. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 17 June 18, 2003 CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council that Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper serve on the Specific Plan No. 2 (Pardee) Ad Hoc Committee. H. Consider Resolution Adopting Revised Rules of Procedure for Council Meetings and Related Functions and Activities and Rescinding Resolution No. 2002- 2016. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2102. Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report, including that the start time of City Council meetings would change from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that all of the specific time periods given in the resolution that are related to the meeting start time would be reviewed for consistency and any necessary changes would be made. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2102 as amended. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. I. Consider the Adoption of a City Policy for the Application of Photovoltaic Systems on New Construction and Existing Facilities within the City. Staff Recommendations: 1) At this time determine that requiring installation of photovoltaic systems on all new residential construction is infeasible given the costs of the current technologies; 2) Direct staff to add to standard conditions a requirement for all new residential construction to incorporate roof hardware to enable photovoltaic systems to be installed in the future without removal of roofing material; and 3) Direct staff to bring to the Planning Commission for recommendation to the City Council, proposed standards for the placement and treatment of photovoltaic systems in residential areas, as well as in commercial and industrial developments, should property owners wish to voluntarily install photovoltaic systems. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 18 June 18, 2003 Councilmember Harper stated that the report was well done and he regrets that the numbers reveal this will not be a feasible requirement; he would like to see the exploration of this model to be incorporated into City and Agency projects such as the new Human Services Complex and new City Hall, which will set an example for the private sector. Mr. Riley stated that photovoltaic systems were considered for the new buildings and it was determined that they would drive up the cost considerably. Councilmember Harper stated that the increased cost should reach a break -even point after five years and from then on would be cost effective. Mr. Kueny suggested that staff present a report to Council on including photovoltaic systems in the new Corporate Yard project before considering any inclusion in the new City Hall. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Wolfe stated that the cost to incorporate the hardware would need to be investigated with the contractors; however, during construction the cost to run conduit for wires and add flashing to prevent leaking, would only cost approximately $100; and would eliminate the more costly need to remove roofing later for an installation. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Wolfe stated that homes that do not have an optimal situation for placement will have a much less attractive cost benefit analysis. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to: 1) At this time determine that requiring installation of photovoltaic systems on all new residential construction is infeasible given the costs of the current technologies; 2) Direct staff to add to standard conditions a requirement for all new residential construction to incorporate roof hardware to enable photovoltaic systems to be installed in the future without Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 19 June 18, 2003 removal of roofing material; and 3) Direct staff to bring to the Planning Commission for recommendation to the City Council, proposed standards for the placement and treatment of photovoltaic systems in residential areas, as well as in commercial and industrial developments, should property owners wish to voluntarily install photovoltaic systems. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mr. Kueny requested Item 10.G. be pulled from the Consent Calendar. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 10.G., which was pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meetin of March 12, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May 28, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meetin of June 4, 2003. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - June 18, 2003. Manual Warrants 112723 - 112724 & $ 325.00 112985 - 112988 $ 45,124.43 Voided Warrant 110948 & 111128 & $ (265.00) 111156 & 111346 112986 Payroll Liability 112980 - 112984 $ 2,556.74 Warrants Regular Warrants 112989 - 113093 & $ 25,423.70 113094 - 113129 $ 876,235.27 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 20 June 18, 2003 C. Consider Resolution Establishing the Appropriation Limitation for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 for the City of Moorpark at $16,650.451. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2103. D. Consider Loan Agreement between the City of Moorpark and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2104. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED E. Consider Resolution Approving an Agreement by and Between the City of Moorpark and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency for the City's Purchase of Parcel ` %C ", Parcel Map No. 5426 from the Redevelopment Agency, for a Human Services Complex. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve Resolution No. 2003 -2105, approving the Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms and amending the FY 2002/2003 budget to appropriate $370,000 for this purpose; and 2) Direct the City Manager, on behalf of the City, to execute Purchase Agreement with Loan Terms, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED F. Consider Moorpark Library Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Approve the library material collection expenditure recommendation of the Moorpark Library Advisory Committee for submittal to the County of Ventura Board of Supervisors. The following item was pulled for individual consideration. G. Consider Approval of Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Approve Mission Statement, Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Mr. Kueny recommended that Item G.17. on stamped page 237 of the agenda report be modified to be consistent with staff's recommendation No. 3 in Agenda Item 9.I. concerning the photovoltaic systems. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to approve the Mission Statement Priorities, Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2003/2004, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 21 June 18, 2003 as amended, for Item G.17. voice vote. 11. ORDINANCES: None. 12. CLOSED SESSION: The motion carried by unanimous Mr. Kueny requested that the City Council go into closed session for one case under Item 12.A. and Item 12.D. Mr. Montes announced that concerning the one case under Item 12.A., the facts and circumstances creating significant exposure to litigation, consist of written communications threatening litigation received from the County's Grand Jury. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a discussion of one case under Item 12.A. and Item 12.D. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 10:06 p.m. A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Designated Representative: Steven Kueny Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, AFL -CIO, CLC, Local 998 AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the Council meeting was recessed and then reconvened for closed session at 10:31 p.m., following the Redevelopment Agency closed session. Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Joseph Montes, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 22 June 18, 2003 The Council reconvened into open session at 11:00 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that one case under Item 12.A. and Item 12.D. were discussed and that there was no action to report. 13. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California July 2, 2003 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on July 2, 2003, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Steven Kueny, City Manager, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Cynthia Borchard, Administrative Services Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Richard Diaz, Sheriff's Department; John Hartnett, Recreation Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. City of Moorpark 20th Anniversary Presentation. Mayor Hunter welcomed the honored guests and thanked the many people who participated in building the city of Moorpark over the past two decades. He highlighted the City's growth and successes, which contribute to making it one of the most desirable places to live and work. Mr. Kueny applauded those who voted for cityhood twenty years ago. He outlined the City's accomplishments in the areas of improvements to infrastructure, parks and recreation facilities, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 July 2, 2003 senior activities, contributions by law enforcement, and the City's financial stability in remaining debt - free. Mr. Kueny commended the involvement of the community and the dedication of current and former Councils, Commissions, and staff to the success of the City. Mr. Hartnett introduced Debbie Ryono from the Moorpark Historical Society who gave a portrayal of Mabel Bradley, Moorpark's first telephone operator. Mabel imparted many humorous facts about old times in Moorpark. Mr. Hartnett read a Special Congressional Certificate of Recognition from U.S. House of Representative Elton Gallegly and presented it to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Mr. Hartnett read a Commendation to the city of Moorpark from Governor Gray Davis and presented it to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Jason Spadaro, representing State Senator Tom McClintock, presented a Senate Resolution commemorating Moorpark's 20 years of cityhood to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Audra Strickland, representing State Assembly Member Tony Strickland, presented an Assembly Resolution to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Jarrod DeGonia, representing 4th District Supervisor Judy Mikels from the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, presented a Resolution to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Mayor John Procter from the City of Santa Paula presented a Proclamation to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Council Member Glen Becerra, representing the City of Simi Valley, presented a Resolution to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 July 2, 2003 David Pollock, Vice President of the Moorpark Unified School District Board of Education, congratulated the City on its 20th birthday and stated he was presenting a birthday present of the newly constructed, joint -use gymnasium at Chaparral Middle School adjacent to Poindexter Park. Virginia Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce, presented a Proclamation to Mayor Hunter, who accepted on behalf of the city of Moorpark. Mr. Harnett recognized the cities of Camarillo, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, and San Buenaventura for sending Proclamations honoring the city of Moorpark. Mr. Hartnett introduced the first Mayor of the city of Moorpark, Leta Yancy- Sutton, who served from July 1983 to November 1986. Former Mayor Yancy- Sutton reminded everyone that they live in the greatest city, in the greatest county, in the greatest state, and in the greatest nation in the world. She claimed her most lasting accomplishment was in hiring Steven Kueny to be the City Manager; and asked the Council to continue to follow her original plans for the City to keep it on the right course. Mr. Hartnett introduced former Councilmember James Hartley, who served the City from July to November 1986. Former Councilmember Hartley spoke about the accomplishments achieved during his tenure, which gave him the opportunity to put the beginning pieces in place for the City to build upon. Mr. Hartnett introduced former Councilmember John Galloway who served the City from November 1986 to November 1988. Former Councilmember Galloway spoke about his observations, upon returning to the city of Moorpark after an absence of seven years, of the underpinnings put into place many years ago that are bearing fruition today; and congratulated the City for doing such a great job. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 July 2, 2003 Mr. Hartnett introduced former Mayor and Councilmember Eloise Brown, who served the City from November 1986 to November 1990 and again from April 1996 to November 1996. Former Mayor and Councilmember Brown proclaimed her love for Moorpark and her pleasure in seeing the City grow with residential, commercial, and industrial projects. Mr. Hartnett introduced former Councilmember Debbie Rodgers, who served the City from November 1996 to November 2000. Former Councilmember Rodgers reminisced about the problems of the past, which are still with the City today, including the need for growth and the traffic on State Route 118. Mr. Hartnett introduced former Councilmember John Wozniak, who served from November 1990 to November 2002. Former Councilmember Wozniak stated that it was an honor and a pleasure serving the community of Moorpark, which is a great place to live and raise children. Mr. Hartnett introduced Patrick and Brendan Weak to represent their father, former Mayor and Councilmember, James Weak, who passed away in 1986 after serving on the City Council from November 1984. The Misters Weak spoke about the honor of representing their father at this ceremony; and stated he would have been very proud of the accomplishments of the city of Moorpark. Mr. Hartnett read an excerpt from a letter sent to the City from the first elected Mayor of Moorpark, Paul Lawrason, in which he congratulated the City and those doing the planning, work, and follow -up to make Moorpark the most outstanding city in Ventura County. Mr. Hartnett introduced Planning Commissioners Mark DiCecco, Scott Pozza, and Kipp Landis. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 July 2, 2003 Commissioner DiCecco stated that the city of Moorpark will always remain a place where you know your neighbor; and no matter how big it gets, it will always have a small town atmosphere. Commissioner Pozza stated that the city of Moorpark is the only place he and his wife want to live and raise their children. Commissioner Landis stated that a community is only as good as its neighbors and the city of Moorpark is blessed with friendly and caring residents. Mr. Hartnett introduced Parks and Recreation Commissioners Tom Pflaumer and Julie Weisberger. Commissioner Pflaumer stated he is proud to represent the city of Moorpark, which is progressing forward in the right direction. Commissioner Weisberger stated that it is a pleasure to be serving the city of Moorpark; and she wished the city a "Happy Birthday." Mr. Hartnett announced the annual July 3rd event at Arroyo Vista Community Park where this year, the city of Moorpark will be honoring its twentieth year of incorporation in grand style, bringing many special activities and guests to the community residents for a day of celebration. Mayor Hunter asked for comments from Councilmembers, starting with Councilmember Harper, who was a member of the first City Council following incorporation. Councilmember Harper stated it was good to see many of his former colleagues; and singled out Leta Yancy Sutton for her efforts to promote cityhood. He recognized Mr. Kueny for the many accomplishments gained under his 19 -year tenure working for the City. Councilmember Parvin stated that Moorpark is a safe community; has great teachers, wonderful parents, bright children, great grandparents, wonderful parks and recreation opportunities, incredible businesses, a great Chamber of Commerce, wonderful charitable and Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 6 July 2, 2003 service organizations, numerous volunteers, great active adults; and overall, is the most involved community she has ever lived in. She stated she looks forward to serving the city of Moorpark in the years to come. Councilmember Millhouse congratulated Mr. Kueny for the fiscal success achieved by the City over the many years he has served as City Manager. He spoke about the honor and pleasure of serving the community; the enthusiastic participation of the citizens; the cooperation of neighboring communities; and the staff working behind the scenes to make the City such a wonderful place to live. Councilmember Mikos spoke about the growth and development of the City created by the interactions of the citizens serving the community; and encouraged everyone to attend the July 3rd celebration. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Mayor Hunter announced that the meeting would recess for a reception. The time was 7:49 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:48 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: Karl Geiger, representing the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon team, spoke of the team's need for additional funds to sponsor travel to Sacramento and Washington D.C. By unanimous voice vote, the Council determined that in order to take immediate action, subsequent to the Agenda being posted, the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon team's request for funds to sponsor travel to Sacramento and Washington D.C. should be added to the Agenda as Item 9.E. to be heard after Public Hearings. Gerald Goldstein, a Moorpark resident, spoke about having difficulty finding transportation to attend meetings. Michael Ellis, a Moorpark resident, reiterated his remarks from the June 18, 2003, City Council meeting, regarding the lack of cooperation from the Moorpark Police Department in handling parking violatidns at a wedding reception held at his home. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 July 2, 2003 Councilmember Millhouse recommended that the police should better communicate with residents in such situations. Councilmember Mikos requested a future agenda item to address the communication issue between citizens and the police so that a protocol can be developed. Captain Diaz concurred with Councilmember Millhouse; and responded to Councilmember Mikos that he would discuss the subject of communication protocol at the August 20th City Council meeting, since he is scheduled for the presentation of the City Manager's monthly report. Ronald Schnoebelen, a Moorpark resident, requested information regarding the widening of Los Angeles Avenue in front of the condominiums at 150 Los Angeles Avenue; and expressed concerns regarding safety, noise, pollution from cars, and the stacking of vehicles waiting at the new signal at Milliard Street. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny confirmed that the widening in that segment of Los Angeles Avenue is more difficult and a significant amount of property will have to be acquired; however, the City will more than meet the legal requirements, not only in compensation, but in mitigation. 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Councilmember Harper requested that the minutes of February 27, July 17, and September 4, 2002, included in Item 10.A., be pulled from the Consent Calendar. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: None. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Consider Minor Modification No. 3 to Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to Vesting Tentative Tract Ma (VTTM) No. 5133, Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue West of Fremont Street, on the Application of Shea Homes. (Continued from June 18, 2003, public hearing open) Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 July 2, 2003 and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2106 approving Minor Modification No. 3 to RPD No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to VTTM No. 5133 subject to Conditions of Approval. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. He presented the Council with a revised Resolution in legislative format reflecting the changes to the Conditions of Approval, which have been discussed with, and are acceptable to the applicant. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Hogan addressed the concern for lack of room to turn around in the hammerhead drives; and noted the installation of fire sprinklers in all of the homes after discussions with the Fire Department. He stated that this type of street design will not become a City standard. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Hogan stated that in regard to the interface with what will be the wetland mitigation area, the applicant is still working with the Flood Control District to develop plans for the area; a future project would actually have more impact on this detention area; and this applicant can be required to install native plants, acceptable to the Flood Control District, in this area. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Hogan stated that the parking on the public street with the four - way entrance would be under City control; the parking on private streets would be under the control of the Homeowner's Association, and the limited parking on the 18 -foot driveways is anticipated to be self - policed by the residents. He also stated that Majestic Court is required to be widened to 40 -feet. In response to Councilmember Parvin's concerns regarding the varying heights of the noise wall, Mr. Hogan stated that a condition has been added to require an additional noise study to determine the height of the wall to be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director; and that some of the height differences are due to differences in grade. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. any• -�� • Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 Julv 2, 2003 Jeff Palmer, representing Shea Homes, 555 St. Charles Drive, Suite 205, Thousand Oaks, stated he is available for questions. Steve Seemann, representing Shea Homes, 555 St. Charles Drive, Suite #205, Thousand Oaks, described the improvements made to Tract 5133 resulting from the reduction in the number of units; and stated that the applicant is in agreement with all of the amended conditions. Ro Hawkinson, a Moorpark resident, stated that he is pleased to learn that houses are replacing the proposed recreation facility; and requested a minimum 8 -foot block wall between the homes on Fremont and the Shea development. Steve Mercado, a Moorpark resident, expressed concerns about the noise level at the new four -way intersection; the height of the noise wall; and whether Fremont Street will be the access street for construction vehicles. Dominic Schmidt, a Moorpark resident, spoke about the importance of retaining the historic character of Fremont Street. He stated that he has spoken with Shea Homes and is pleased with the proposed development, the four -way signalized intersection, the relocation of the park, and that Fremont Street will not be used as a construction street. Ronald Schnoebelen, a Moorpark resident, repeated his request from the June 18th meeting that the proposed wall, adjacent to the garages should replace the current fencing to eliminate a gap where litter can accumulate. Mr. Hogan stated that there is no intention to have construction traffic on Fremont Street; a future project, and not this project, involves a recreation facility; Condition No. 22 could be modified to allow the Community Development Director to increase the sound wall height to provide screening on the eastern property line to 8 -feet if necessary; the placement of the wall adjacent to the garages is addressed in Condition No. 24, where it is left up to the Community GF, 'r, _. 0 •� � _• Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 July 2, 2003 Development Director to decide placement, with the understanding that Council does not want a gap in that location; this wall placement does require negotiations between the applicant and the Homeowner's Association; this project will not change the nature of Fremont Street, other than to provide better drainage; and the Community Development Director will make sure the height of the sound /privacy wall at Los Angeles Avenue provides adequate screening. A discussion followed among the Council and staff regarding the language of Condition No. 24 and whether it is flexible enough to guarantee the height and placement of the wall to preclude trash accumulation. The consensus of the Council was to have the language of Condition No. 24 provide flexibility to the Community Development Director to have discretion over the height, type, and placement of the wall in working with the applicant and the Homeowner's Association. In response to Council, Mr. Hogan stated that Condition No. 29 would be added to require, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the location of natural vegetation in the transition area to the Arroyo Simi at the southern portion of the development; the two vacant lots on Fremont Street are under contract for future development by Shea Homes; access to a future trail system would be from the parking areas along the south portion of this property, as well as the possibility of converting the access road along the top edge of the basin adjacent to this property to a future multi -use trail; and a condition could be added to require a gate opening from this development to the Arroyo for access to any future trail development. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Seemann stated that the concept of adding a gate for future access is feasible. He also stated he would not mind a condition requiring the gate; however, it must be understood that they may not be able to perform due to the County of Ventura's requirements. Mr. Hogan stated that the requirement would be to provide the gate in anticipation of gaining future Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 July 2, 2003 access; therefore, there would be no delays to this project. A discussion followed among the Council and staff regarding the addition of a condition using language from previously approved projects required to install access gates. It was the consensus of the Council to add Condition No. 30 for the access gate. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2003- 2106 approving Minor Modification No. 3 to RPD No. 98 -01 and Minor Modification No. 3 to VTTM No. 5133 subject to Conditions of Approval, as amended to: 1) Modify Condition No. 22 to allow the Community Development Director to increase the sound wall height along the eastern property line to 8 -feet, if necessary; 2) Modify the language of Condition No. 24 to provide flexibility to the Community Development Director to have discretion over the location, final design, and construction of the wall along the western boundary; 3) Add Condition No. 29 to require the landscape plan shall incorporate, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, natural vegetation in the transition area to the Arroyo at the southern portion of the development; and 4) Add Condition No. 30 to require the installation of a gate in the southern project boundary fence /wall for access to the Arroyo by the project residents in the event that a trail is installed. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003 -04, a Request to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (in Addition to Beer and Wine) in Conjunction with Food Service at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse, 11800 Championship Drive, on the Application of Moorpark Country Club (Toll Brothers, Inc.). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 - conditionally approving CUP No. 2003 -04. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 July 2, 2003 In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Hogan stated that the language of Condition No. 6 would be modified to clarify the difference between nightly entertainment versus entertainment that accompanies a temporary event and any corresponding requirement for a Conditional Use Permit. In response to Mayor review the requireme one security guard consistent with the City facilities, to case -by -case basis. Hunter, Mr. Hogan stated he would nt in Condition No. 4, to provide for every 50 people, which is current City policy when renting see if it could be handled on a Councilmember Parvin concurred with Councilmember Harper that Condition No. 6 is unclear; concurred with Mayor Hunter that Condition No. 4 should provide more flexibility by raising the number of people per security guard; and stated that the 90 -day lead time for applying for a temporary use permit is also too restrictive. She further stated that Condition No. 13 is possibly too restrictive and an exception should be made for New Year's Eve. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Mike Nix, General Manager of the Moorpark Country Club, spoke on behalf of Toll Brothers, Inc., 11800 Championship Drive, Moorpark, and stated that the requirement for security guards is more than what is really needed; prohibiting the sale of liquor after midnight is acceptable, if an exception could be made for New Year's Eve; and 90 -days notice to apply for a Use Permit is very restrictive, since some meetings are scheduled with only two days notice and of course no one can pre - schedule an event such as a wake. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Nix stated that the industry standard does not require a Use Permit for functions of up to 200 -300 people; and nearby clubs do not typically have this requirement. Liz Gherna, representative from Beverage License Solutions, Inc. for the Moorpark Country Club, 11800 Championship Drive, Moorpark, stated that the CUP is incredibly prohibitive; requested that Condition Nos. 4 and 6 be reworded; and indicated that Condition No. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 July 2, 2003 13 would be acceptable with an exception for New Year's Eve. A discussion followed among Council and staff regarding clarifying the language in Condition Nos. 4 and 6 to indicate that the restrictions are not intended for any event associated with the golf course, but are in regard to stand -alone events; setting parameters for 50 -100 guests; reducing the processing time for the application to 14 -days; and modifying Condition No. 13 to allow for liquor service after midnight on New Years Eve. Mr. Hogan stated that there is some concern when the type of event is unknown and staff is rushed into coordinating different licensing groups; it is beneficial to have a standard set of conditions for compliance; and then deal with events outside those parameters, such as proms, weddings, or wakes, to craft conditions outside of the standard. Councilmember Harper stated that he does not want to over regulate the use of private property; and asked if Condition Nos. 4 and 6 could be crafted to respond to the number of complaints received and then implement accelerated enforcement, if needed. Mr. Hogan stated that the conditions could be crafted for all events to require the applicant to maintain adequate licenses for health and food service, to meet the occupancy requirements, and to provide for onsite /offsite traffic control; and then when events exceed 200 participants, come to the City to apply for a Temporary Use Permit within a 30 -day limit. A discussion followed among the Council, staff and the applicant focusing on what numbers of participants should trigger the need for a permit; expanding the hours for special events; revisiting the number of security guards required; and including flexibility in re- crafting Condition Nos. 4, 6 and 13. Mr. Kueny recommended that rather than making unilateral changes to these conditions without due process, it would be best to allow the Community Development Director to work with the applicant and Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 14 Julv 2, 2003 the City Attorney and have the Resolution come back on the Consent Calendar on August 20th. In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Nix stated that this would be acceptable. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council to amend Condition Nos. 4, 6, and 13, after discussions between the Community Development Director, the applicant, and the City Attorney; and present the Resolution on the Consent Calendar for August 20, 2002. C. Consider Minor Modification No. 5 to Resolution 96- 1197 (General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 94 -01, Residential Planned Development Permit (RPD) No. 94- 01, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 94 -01 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 4928), Generally Between Grimes Canyon Road and Walnut Canyon Road Adjacent to Championship Drive, on the Application of Toll Brothers, Inc. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Approve revisions to the Design Guidelines per the staff report; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2107 approving Minor Modification No. 5 to Resolution 96 -1197 (GPA No. 94 -01, RPD No. 94 -01, CUP No. 94 -01, and VTTM No. 4928) subject to Conditions of Approval. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. Craig Messi, representing Toll Brothers, 7142 Trivino Drive, Moorpark, stated that the applicant concurs with the Conditions of Approval, and he is available for questions. A. DeeWayne Jones, a Moorpark resident, spoke in support of the project. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to: 1) Approve revisions to the Design Guidelines per the agenda report; and 2) Adopt v�vto-W 2 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 15 Julv 2, 2003 Resolution No. 2003 -2107 approving Minor Modification No. 5 to Resolution 96 -1197 (GPA No. 94 -01, RPD No. 94 -01, CUP No. 94 -01, and VTTM No. 4928), subject to Conditions of Approval. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: AT THIS POINT in the meeting, Item 9.E. was heard. E. Consider Request by the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon Team for Funds to Sponsor Travel to Sacramento, California and Washington, D.C. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Geiger stated that the shortfall in funds for travel is $3,000. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. A brief discussion followed among the Councilmembers regarding the achievement of the Academic Decathlon team and this very worthwhile activity. MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the request for $3,000 from the General Fund Reserve for travel costs associated with the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon team's July 2003 events in Sacramento, California, and Washington D.C. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider the Proposals for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Provide Computer Based Mapping and Data. (Continued from June 4, 2003) Staff Recommendation: Accept the proposal from Geographic Data and Management Solutions (GDMS) in the amount of $25,713.69 to develop a Geographic Information System for the City and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and sign an agreement on the City's behalf for the initial setup and ongoing service. Ms. Borchard gave the staff report. Councilmember Harper stated this is not an appropriate use of the CLEEP funds and the General Fund would be a better source. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 July 2, 2003 In response to Mayor Hunter, Captain Diaz stated he was not familiar with how law enforcement would use the GIS system. In response to Counciimember Harper's comments that law enforcement would only use a small portion of the mapping system, Mr. Hogan stated that it would allow the Police Department to view where the frequency of crimes is occurring and expand the use of patrol vehicles. Mr. Kueny recommended using up the CLEEP Fund balance now, and if another law enforcement technology need is identified later, funds could be substituted from the Reserve Fund. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Riley stated that there is no certain date to spend the CLEEP funds; however, it would be best to complete this commitment before Sacramento takes the funds retroactively. Councilmember Millhouse stated he would defer to the expertise of staff and support the recommendation. Mayor Hunter stated that recommendation, since once the GIS program use will Department to become an tool. he can also support the fully implemented by staff, be expanded by the Police effective law enforcement Karl Geiger, a Moorpark resident, asked if the ownership price of the software provides for maintenance and updates to the GIS data base. Ms. Borchard stated that the package includes maintenance. Mr. Hogan stated that updates to the GIS data base will be through the Assessor Parcel Map System contract the City has with the County of Ventura. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Hogan stated that consideration will be given to charging fees for use of the GIS system during a full review of all fees and deposits. � X% X �. Minutes of the City Council Moorr)ark, California Paqe 17 July 2, 2003 Councilmember Parvin stated she could see this system playing an important role in the Police Department for tracking crime within the City. Councilmember Mikos stated she likes the idea of providing this service to the public to make the whole application process easier. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Councilmember Parvin stated that she was interested in charging fees to developers, not the public. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to accept the proposal from Geographic Data and Management Solutions (GDMS) in the amount of $25,713.69 to develop a Geographic Information System for the City and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and sign an agreement on the City's behalf for the initial setup and ongoing service. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -1, with Councilmember Harper dissenting. Councilmember Harper stated that the purchase of the software is an excellent acquisition for the City; however, he is having difficulty justifying the use of CLEEP funds, and would like to have seen the funds used for something more closely related to direct law enforcement. B. Consider Proposed Priority Processing of General Plan Amendment Pre - Screening Applications Nos. 2003 -02 and 2003 -03, Zone Changes, Residential Planned Developments and Tentative Tract Maps, Development Agreement and Other Related Entitlement Applications for the Husted and Mazur Properties on the Application of Toll Brothers. Staff Recommendation: Remove the Toll Brothers applications, both Husted and Mazur, from the General Plan Amendment Pre - Screening process and authorize processing of the General Plan Amendments and zone changes and related entitlements consistent with the agenda report. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report. Craig Messi, representing Toll Brothers, 7142 Trevino Drive, Moorpark, stated that the applicant concurs with staff's recommendation for fast tracking. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 18 July 2, 2003 Mayor Hunter stated that as a member of the Ad Hoc Committee, he is in favor of this plan as it provides a comprehensive build -out for the northern part of the City, and he will support staff's recommendation. Councilmember Mikos, also a member of the Ad Hoc Committee, stated that she agrees to move forward to achieve a comprehensive build -out. MOTION: Councilmember Parvin moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to remove the Toll Brothers applications, both Husted and Mazur, from the General Plan Amendment Pre - Screening process and authorize processing of the General Plan Amendments and zone changes and related entitlements consistent with the agenda report. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Approval of an In -House City Engineer Position. Staff Recommendation: Approve City Engineer position and authorize City Manager to proceed with recruitment and selection process. Mr. Kueny gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the recruitment period will end before September 1St, followed by the selection process and hiring, and the anticipated start date would be in late 2003 or early 2004. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Councilmember Harper stated that this is no reflection on the competence of the current contract City Engineer. The also stated the City is of such a size so as to require in -house management who report directly to the City Manager, and he will support the recommendation. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to approve the City Engineer position and authorize the City Manager to proceed with recruitment and selection process. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 19 July 2, 2003 D. Consider Award of Contract for Construction Management Services for the Police Services Center Project to Rollins Consulting, Inc. in the Amount of $430,000. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the award of a contract to Rollins Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $430,000 and approve the Agreement for Professional Services subject to final language approval by the City Manager. Mr. Riley gave the staff report and stated that Mr. Rollins and Kevin Mitchell are available for questions. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Riley stated that the reason this company was selected for the job, even though their cost is higher, is due to the number of on -site management hours this firm will be dedicating to the project. He went on to state that it takes a significant amount of staff time if there is not competent management in the field. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to authorize the award of a contract to Rollins Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $430,000 and approve the Agreement for Professional Services subject to final language approval by the City Manager. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of the minutes of February 27, July 17, and September 4, 2002, of Item 10.A., which were pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 18, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 16, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of May 17, 2003. C in. �r'. " r'� 9 . ✓ ./ �" r.d Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 20 July 2, 2003 Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 21, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 4, 2003. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of June 18, 2003. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - July 2, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant Payroll Liability Warrants 113135 - 113136 & 113130 - 113134 $ 37,662.79 $ 0.00 $ 2,590.17 Regular Warrants 113137 - 113258 & $ 373,260.63 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. C. Consider First Amendment to Regulatory Agreement for Vintage Crest Senior Apartments, L.P. Modifying Legal Description of the Project Site. Staff Recommendation: Approve the subject Amendment and authorize the City Manager to sign the Amendment, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and the City Attorney. D. Consider Agreement with Calleguas Municipal Water District Pertaining to Certain Improvements Required for the Widening of Los Angeles Avenue at Shasta Avenue. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve a project for the City to undertake the Los Angeles Avenue improvements described in the staff report, with all costs to be reimbursed by the developer of Tract 5053; 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement with Pacific Communities for the reimbursement of City costs for the above described work, subject to final language approval by the City Manager and City Attorney; and 3) Approve the subject Agreement with Calleguas, subject to final -. — Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 21 Julv 2, 2003 language approval by the City Manager and the City Attorney. E. Consider Notice of Completion for the 2002 Curb Ramp Project. Staff Recommendation: Accept the work as complete. F. Consider Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Competitive Service, Non - Competitive Service, and Hourly Employees and Rescinding Resolution No. 2002- 2041. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2108. G. Consider Rejection of Claim: Elaine Michaels. Staff Recommendation: Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimants. H. Consider Approval of an Early Grading Permit for Final Map Phases 2 and 3 of Tentative Tract Map No. 5161, Located at the Southwest Corner of Gisler Road and Poindexter Avenue, on the Application of Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to approve an Early Grading Agreement for Phases 2 and 3 of Tract No. 5161. I. Consider Use of California Law Enforcement Equipment Program ( CLEEP) Grant for 2003/04 Fiscal Year. Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve CLEEP expenditure plan; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -2109, amending the 2003/2004 operating budget to appropriate CLEEP funds. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED The following items were pulled from Item 10.A. for individual consideration: 10. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting February 27, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 17, 2002. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 4, 2002. Councilmember Harper stated that he had not been present for the meetings of February 27, July 17, and Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 22 July 2, 2003 September 4, 2002, and would be abstaining from the vote. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to approve the minutes of February 27, July 17, and September 4, 2002. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -0, with Councilmember Harper abstaining. 11. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance No. 294, An Ordinance of the Cit of Moorpark, California, Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract between the City Council of the City of Moorpark and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS). Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 294 read for the second time and adopted as read. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance 294. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 294. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded the motion to declare Ordinance No. 294 read for a second time and adopted as read. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny requested that the City Council go into closed session for one case under Item 12.A. He announced that the facts and circumstances creating significant exposure to litigation, which facts and circumstances are know to potential plaintiffs, consist of a City employment issue and the possible resolution and settlement of that issue. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to adjourn to of one case under Item 12.A. voice vote. moved and Councilmember Parvin closed session for a discussion The motion carried by unanimous Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 23 Julv 2, 2003 A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared. The time was 10:55 p.m. The Council reconvened into closed session at 11:02 p.m. Present in closed session were Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Bradley Wohlenberg, Assistant City Attorney (via telephone conference call); and Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk. The Council reconvened into open session at 11:14 p.m. Mr. Kueny verbally reported that one case under Item 12.A. was discussed, and that the City Council by unanimous voice vote authorized the City Manager to accept and approve a Separation and Release Agreement with an employee, the substance of which is intended to permit retirement pursuant to Government Code Section 20903. 13. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 11:15 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt City Clerk a 01N _ ITEM 10 . . 1`31 -✓ i;i,.�(,;�i '1.T � %i ?il (� , CITY OF MOORPARK p WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE 2002 -2003 FISCAL YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 2003 SEQUENCE 1 rom To MANUAL 113264 & WARRANTS 113266 - 113270 & 113401 - 113403 & 113406 & 113583 - 113586 VOIDED WARRANT REGULAR WARRANTS TOTAL 113043 113271 - 113379 & 113407 - 113498 & 113682 - 113701 AMOUNT $ 843,694.67 $ (95.00) $ 1,299,066.26 $ 481,305.54 $ 205,270.65 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUN77NG FE*RIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 010C - INTFRNA:, SERVICES FUND 3UDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C : %VOICE CHIC DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 010057000000 9413 SCUTHERN CALIFCRNIA N 07/16/03 1101 M07:603 5 /14- 6 /13CITY HALL 20 5/14- 6/3.3/03 07/16/03 113402 TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES NET PAYABLE 010057100000 9225 JOHNSTON, MELODY 07/16/03 1101 M071603 MICROSOFT GOVT CIO S 20 EXP REP 6/7 07/16/03 113406 TOTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CHECK AMT TOTAL INFOR- MATION SYSTEMS NET PAYABLE TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT T07A1, TNTFRNAL SERVICES FUND INET PAYABLE `j E. �r RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:11 PACE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CF:ECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 07/08/03 1904.48 0.00 0.00 1904.48 1904.43 1904.48 0.00 07/16/03 812.31 0.0C 0.00 812.31 PENTANATION - FUND ACCOUNI'ING 812.31 812.31 2716.79 273.6.79 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE. 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - :000 - CENERAL FUND BUDGET JNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES ':AX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION '1' /C INVOICE CH.K DATE ACCOJNC CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE: 103072100000 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1' -01 0.00 07/08/03 67.75 MO.71603 5 /14- 6 /13VE.CTOR 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 67.75 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT 67.75 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL, NET PAYABLE 67.75 10OC76200000 94:3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 221C.6'/ ,071603 5/14- 6 /13C0MM CTR 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 2210.67 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACT'.,ITIES CHECK AM. 2210.67 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES NET DAYABLE: 2210.67 100076207701 9413 SOUTHERN CALTFORNIA N 07/16/03 1i01 0.00 07/08/03 - 637.40 M071603 5/14- 6 /13AV COMM CTR 20 5/14- 6/1.3/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 1637.40 TOTAL ARROYO VISTA COM.. CENTER CHECK AMT 1637.40 TOTAL ARROYC VISTA COMM. CENTER NET PAYABLE 1637,40 100076301604 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 1185.90 M071603 5/14- 6 /13PCH HILL. BL 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 1 185.90 TOTAL ADULT SPORTS CHECK AMT 1185.90 T0TA1, ADULT SPORTS NET PAYABLE 11R5.90 100081.000000 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/C8/03 172.20 M07:603 5/14 -6/13 798 MPK AV 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 1'/2.20 TOTAL PURL'C WORKS CHECK AMT --72.20 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS NFT PAYABLE 172.20 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT 5273.92 'TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 5273.92 i RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:12 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING L 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 21CO - COMUN_TY WTDE BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 210078007022 9630 ECOLOGY CONSTRUCT -CN N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 M071603 6 /03AVCP PHASE II 20 APP #3 07/16/03 113403 0.00 TOTAL AV SPORTS FIELDS CHECK AMT TO AL AV SPORTS FIELDS NET PAYABLE TOTAL COMMUNITY WIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY WIDE NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 07/28/C3 TTMF. 16:01:12 PAGE 3 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/16/03 498208.19 0.00 498208.19 PENTAMA7:0N - FUND ACCOUNTi NG 498208.19 498208.19 498208.19 498208.19 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2111 - ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 1 BUDGET UNI° ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE. ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM. CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCR:PTION T/C TNVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 211178007025 9620 CLERK 07 THE COURT N 07/02/03 1101 0.00 M070203 296 CHARLES ST CONDE 20 DUARTE PROP 07/02/03 1.1.3264 0.00 TOTAL ZCNE DEVF.LOPN.ENT FEES 1 CHECK AMT 'F07AL LONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 1 NET PAYABLE TOTA!.. ZONE. DEVELOPMENT FEES 1 CHECK A-Nr TOTAL ZONE DT_VELOPM=NT FEES 1 NET PAYABLE. i1 RUN DATE C7/28/03 TIME 16:01:12 PAGE 4 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NF.T PAYABLE 07/02/03 55000.00 0.00 55000.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 55000.00 5500C.00 55000.00 55000.00 C7/28/03 0.0C 07/08/03 113402 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 0.00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 07/08/03 113402 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CI ^YWIDE BUDCET UNIT ACCOUNT VFNDOR 1099 PURCRASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTRO- DESCR'_PTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 230079007901 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 i101 M07:603 5/14- 6 /13 -RKWYS S ME 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AM': T07AL AD 84 -2 CTTYWIDE NE" PAYABLE 230089008901 94'4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 M071603 5/14- 6 /13SCIIOOL PEOF 20 5/ 14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 230089008901 9414 SCi;THERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 M0'/1603 5 /14- 6 /13CITY LIMITS 20 5/14 - 6/13/03 07/16/03 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT ':'OTAL AD 84 -2 CITYW =DE N37 PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE � J (; 1 PAGE 5 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 07/08/03 112.40 0.00 0.00 -2.40 i101 0.0C 07/08/03 113402 0.00 0.00 1101. 0.00 07/08/03 113402 0.00 0.00 (.� RUN UATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:1.2 PENTIMMATION - FUND ACCOUNTTNG 112.40 112.40 '1.45 7.45 22283.46 22283.46 22290.91 2229C.91 22290.91 22290.91 22403.31 22403.31 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2301 - AD 85 -2 ZONE 1 D;DGET UNI" ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROG*.AM CASH ACCT SALES TAX D'.SC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 230:7900'79Ci 9413 SCUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 17.28 M071603 5/14- 6 /13ZONE 1 20 5/14 - 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 17.28 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 CHECK AMT 17.28 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 NET PAYABLE 17.28 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 CHECK A?!T 17.28 TOTAL AD 84 -2 70NE 1 NET PAYABLF. 17.28 C; {j Fa U R[1N DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01.:'' -2 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTTNG PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY rUND - 2302 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 B'JDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE: ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USF. TAX 230279007901 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 M0716C3 5/14- 6 /13ZONE 2 2C 5/14 - 6/13/03 01/16/03 :13402 0.00 TOTAL AD 84 -2 7CNE 2 CHECK AM" 'FOTAI AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 'ZONE 2 CHECK AMT TOTAi, AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE t (C i f J I! RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME :6:01:12 PAGE 7 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/09/03 42.96 0.00 42.96 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 42.96 42.96 42.96 42.96 07/28/03 CITY OF M.00RPARK, CA ACCOUNTTNG PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAT, CHECK ACTIVITY F;;ND - 2304 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRTPTION T/C IA`VOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 2304790079C1 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 M071603 5/14- 6/.137ONE 4 20 5/14- 6/1.3/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 CHECK AMT '1'0.'AL All 84 -2 ZONE 4 NET PAYABLE TOTAT, A7 84 -2 ZONE 4 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 NET PAYABLE ii s RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:13 PAGE 8 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/08/03 14.24 0.00 14.24 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUN7TXG 14.24 14.24 14.24 14.24 07/28/03 CITY OF XOORPARK, CA PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUNC - 23C5 - AD 84 -2 70N-7 5 BUDGET UNI- ACCCJNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH: ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE. CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYARIF. 230579007901 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 13.62 MC/1603 5/74- 6 /13ZONE 5 2C 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 13.62 `OTAL A-) 84 2 ZONE 5 CHECK AMT 13.62 'fCTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 NET PAYARLE 13.62 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE S C14ECK AMT 13.62 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 NET PAYABLE 13.62 M s f i / � W RUN DATE 07/28/03 TI`E 16:01:13 PENTANIITION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOCRPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERTOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2306 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 BUDGET JNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPT70N T/C INVOICE CHK DATE. ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 230679007901 9413 SODTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 110" C.00 M071603 5/14- 6 /13ZON= 6 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 1134102 0.00 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 CHECK A.I77 TO':AL AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 NET PAYABLE i F RUN DATE 07/28/03 TWE 16:01:13 PAGE. 10 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/08/03 12.96 0.00 12.96 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12.96 12.96 12.96 12.96 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL, CHECK ACTIVITY PJND - 2307 - AD 84 -2 'ZONE 7 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDF TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCR =PITON T/C iNJJO?Cx' C'.IK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 230779007901 943 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 101 0.00 X071603 5/14- 6 /13ZONE 7 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 :13402 0.00 ':OTAE, AD 84-2 ZONE 7 CHECK A.MT TOTAL AD 8: -2 70NE 7 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE '7 NET PAYABLE \v � J C.. RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:13 PAGE :i DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYA3:,E 07/08/03 38.88 0.00 38.88 PENTANATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 38.88 38.88 38.88 38.88 07/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2308 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PJRCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CON -ROL DESCRIPTION 71C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NC 230879007901 ')413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 M0716C3 5/14- 6 /13ZONE 8 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 C'i7CK APMT TOTA:, AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 NET PAYA3;.F, FOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 NET PAYABLE �q � J f � RUN DATE 07 /28/03 TIME 16:01::3 PAGE 12 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AYT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 C7/08/03 45.66 0.00 0.00 45.66 PENIAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 45.66 45.66 45.66 45.66 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY Fi:ND - 23C9 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PJRCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCR:PTION TIC INVOICE CHK DA'Z'E ACCOUNT CHECK NO 2309'7900790: 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 M071603 5/14- 6 /13ZONE 9 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE_ 9 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZON3 9 NET PAYABLE f � RUN DATE 07 /28/03 TIME 16:01:13 PACE 13 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AXT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 01/08/03 1.94 0.00 0.00 1.94 PENTA.MATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 07/28/03 CITY OF MOCRPARK, CA PAGE 14 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/C2 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FJND - 2310 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 BODGE: UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DA-E CHECK A-YT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE C:LK DATE. ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX D-ISC AMT NET PAYA8:,E 23107900790: 9413 SCUTAERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 121.96 MC /1603 5/14 6 /13ZONE 10 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 121.96 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 CHECK AM7 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 NET PAYABLE :21.96 121.96 TOTAL, AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 CHECK AMT iO':AL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 SET PAYABLE '21.96 \v j F ' J RUN DATE 07/28/03 "IME 16:01::3 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 ACCOCNTTNG PERIOD: 13/02 FUND - 2311 - AD 84 -2 701 BUDGET SNIT ACCOUNT CONTRO:. 231179007901 9,!13 M071603 C:TY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY �E li VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE CRDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 /146 /13ZONE 1.1 20 5/14.6/13/03 07/16/C3 1.13402 T.^,TAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 70NE 11 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 NET PAYABLE EUN DA'Z'E 07/28/03 TINE 16:01:13 PACE 15 SALES TAX DISC DA'Z'E CHECK Av.T USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 07/08/C3 12.96 0.00 0.00 12.96 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 12.96 12.96 :2.96 12.95 07/28/C3 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 16 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2312 - All 84 -2 ZONE 12 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCPASF ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACC'i SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C 1NVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AM:'f NET PAYABLE 231279007901 9413 SOJTHERN CA- IFORNIA N 07/16/03 11.01 0.00 07/08/03 99.62 M071603 5/14- 6 /13ZONE :2 20 5/14 - 6/133/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 99.62 TO"A', AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 CHECK AMT 99.62 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 Nc:'f PAYABLE 99.62 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 CHECK AMT 99.62 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 NET PAYABLE 99.62 \v RUN DATE C7/28/03 TIME .6:01:13 PENTA- MATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE: 17 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL C!IECK ACTTVITY FUND - 240C - PARK MAINTENANCF. DISTRICT 3UDCE'1 JNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE.. ORDE TRANSAC- PROGRA-X CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK KAT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C TWOSCE CHK DA';E ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC ANT NET PAYABLE: 2400780078C3 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1'_01. 0.00 07/08/03 2081.74 M071603 5/14- 6 /13ARRCYC VIST 20 S /14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 2081.74 TOTAL ARROYO VISTA COMM. PARK CHECK AMT TOTAL ARROYO VISTA COMM. PARK NET PAYABLE 2081.74 2081.74 240078007804 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1:01 0.00 07/08/03 11.02 lA071603 5 /14- 6 /13VIRGINIA CO 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 11.02 TOTAL VIRGINIA COLONY PARK ClIECK AM^. TOTAL VIRGINIA COLONY PARK NET PAYABLE 11.02 11.02 2400'18007805 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 39.04 MO;1603 5 /14- 6 /13CAMPUS PRK 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 39.04 TOTAL CAMPUS PARK CHECK AMT '"OTA1, CAMPUS PARK NET PAYABLE 35 04 4 39.0,: 240078001806 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 26.92 M0'/1603 5 /14- 6 /13CAMPUS CYN 20 5/14 - 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 26.92 TOTAL CAMPUS CANYON PARK CHECK AMT 'TOTAL CAMPUS CANYON PARK NET PAYABLE 26 97 26.92 2400/8007807 9413 SOUTHERNN CALIFORNTA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 70.67 M071603 5 /14- 6 /13GRIFFIN PRK 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 O.OG 70.67 TOTAL. COLLEGE VIEW PARK C117CK AMT TOTAL COLLEGE VIEW PARK NET PAYABLE 70.G7 70.67 240078007808 9413 SOUTHERN CALTFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 C.00 07/08/03 446./4 M071603 5/14- 6 /13PCH RILL PR 20 5/14 - 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 446.74 TOTAL.. PEACH HILL PARK ClIECK AMT TOTAL PEACH HILL PARK NET PAYABLE 446.74 446.74 240078007810 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 133.35 N.071603 5 /14- 6 /13MTN MEADOWS 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 133.35 'TOTAL MOJNTAIN MEADOWS PARK CHECK AMT TOTAL MOUNTAIN MEADOWS PARK NET PAYABLE 133.35 133.35 240078007811 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/2_6/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 113.59 C'4 M07_603 5 /14- 6 /13TIERRA REJA 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.0C 0.00 113.59 CJ t�' 7� RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:01:14 C I PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING C7/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY UND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDF. TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DF.SCRIPTiON T/C INVOICE CHX DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT TOTAL T:E'RRA REJADA PAR'( CHECK AMT TOTAL TIERRA R JADA PARK NET PAYABT.E 240078007812 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 M071603 5/14- 6 /13CUNTRY TRAI 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 COTAL COUNTRY TRAIL PARK CHECK AMT TOTAL COUNTRY TRAIL PARK NET PAYABLE 240078007813 94 --3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 .i0] 0.00 07/08/03 M071603 5 /14- 6 /13GLENWOOD PR 20 5/14 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 T07AL GT,FVWOOD PARK CHECK AMT TOTAL GLENWOOD PARK NFT PAYABLE 24007800'1814 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 07/08/03 M071603 5/14- 6 /13VIT.1,A CAN.PE 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 O.CO O.CC TOTAL VILLA CAMPESINA PARK CHECK AMT TOTAL VILLA CAMPESINA PARK NET PAYABLE '1'07A:. PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AM1' TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DTSTRICT NET PAYABLE rr� a RUN DATE 07/28/C3 TIME 16:01:14 PENTAMATTON � FUND ACCOUNTING PACE 18 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 113.59 113.59 1.3.39 13.39 '_3.39 13.39 29.73 29.73 29.73 29.73 71.24 71.24 71.24 71.24 3037.43 3037.43 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX R':JG7-T UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCILASE ORDF. TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACC: CONTROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOTCE CIIK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 260583100000 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1:01 M07I603 5/14- 6 /13ST MA'NP 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 i13402 260583100000 9414 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/03 1'_01 M071603 5 /14- 6 /13TRAFFTC SIG 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR N -77 PAYABLE TOTAL STREET M.AINTENANCE CHECK AMT TOTAT S':REET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE. TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT -OTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE t; L i RUN DATE 07/28/03 ':IME 16:01:14 liff SALES TAX USE TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DTSC DATE DISC AMT 07/08/03 0.00 07/08/03 0.00 PI;N'rA.MATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE 19 CHECK A`Cf NET PAYABLE 73.30 73.3C 1206.58 1206.58 1279.88 1279.88 1279.88 1279.88 1279.88 279.88 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 20 ACCO[R.'TTNG P"cRIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MCD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDG TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUA'T CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 2901 24202001 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/C3 1101 0.0C 07/08/03 '1,89 M.07:602 5 /14 6 /13MO3ILEE'OMF. 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 1134C2 0.00 0.00 7.89 TOTAL MRPK MC3ILE HM PARK RELCC CHECK AMT TOTAL YRPK MOBILE HY PARK RELOC NFT PAYABLE 7.89 7.89 TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC Y.OUSE /INC NET PAYABLE 7.89 7 99 \v 1 h �= RUN DATE 07/28/03 T.TME 16:01:14 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUN' :ING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPAR :{, CA PAGE 21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 29C2 - MRA AREA 1 -TNCR & OTHER BUDGET UNT7 ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CON "ROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT Nn:a PAYABLE 290224100000 9413 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 07/16/C3 '_101 0.00 07/08/03 15.09 M072_603 5 /1.4- 6 /13REDEVELOPMF 20 5/14 - 6/13/03 07/16/03 113402 0.00 0.00 15.09 7CTA1, MRA ECONOMIC DEVF.i3OPMENT CHECK AMT 15.09 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NFT PAYABLE 15.09 70TAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT 15.09 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -!NCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE 15.09 m ci t +� e i ' kU:1 DATE 07/28/03 '1'1ME 16:01:14 V PE_NTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING C7/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PER'_CD: 13/02 MANUAL, CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 4002 - POLICE FACILITIES FUND BJDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 400221002005 960_ dWCOT V 07/16/03 1101 0.00 M071603 5 /03PD SRVC CTR ARCH 20 16924 07/1.6/03 113401 0.00 TOTAL POLICF SERVICES CENTER CHECK AM.'1' TO'iAL POLICE SERVICES CENTER NET PAYABLE TOTAL, POLICE FACILITIES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL POLICE FACTI,I':'IES FUND NET PAYABF,F. ii RUN DATE 07/28/C3 TIME 16:01:14 r,AGF. 22 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/16/03 99232.06 0.00 99232.06 PENTAMP.TION - FUND ACCOUNTING 99232.06 99232.06 99232.06 99232.06 07/28/03 CITY OF MOCRPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK AC"IVITY FUND - 5000 - LOCAL TRA.VSTT ? ROGRAMS 8C BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX CONTRCL DESCRIPTTON T/C 7NVOICE CHK DATE. ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX 500013107304 9414 SOUTHERN CALTFORNIA N 07/16/03 1101 0.00 MC71603 5 /14- 6 /13YETROLINK L 20 5/14- 6/13/03 07/16/03 1'13402 C.00 TOTAL METROLINK CHECK A-M7 TOTAL METROI,INK NET PAYABLE. TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PRCGP.AMS 8C CHECK AMT TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABi,F c7 c; f) RUN DATE 07/28/03 T7MF. 16:01:14 PAGE 23 DISC DATE CHECK AMT DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 07/08/03 144.46 0.00 144.46 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 144.46 144.46 144.46 144.46 687741.10 687741.10 08/11/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 CITY OF MANUAL MOORPARK, CA CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 1 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND HUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION 1099 T/C PURCHASE ORDE INVOICE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE ;000 2208 S E I U LOCAL 998 M070303 UNTON DUES N 20 6/14 -27/03 07/03/03 07/03/03 1101 113267 0.00 0.00 07/03/03 0.00 409.19 409.19 1000 2207 UNITED WAY OF VENTUR M070303 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIO N 20 6/14 -27/03 07/03/03 07/03/03 1101 113269 0.00 0.00 07/03/03 0.00 179.00 179.00 1000 2299 VENTURA COUNTY DISTR M070303 ID #9600616061 N 20 07/03/03 07/03/03 07/03/03 1101 113270 0.00 0.00 07/03/03 0.00 168.46 168.46 1000 2299 SANDRA KUENY M070303 CASE #SD020444 N 20 6/14 -27/03 07/03/03 07/03/03 1101 113268 0.00 0.00 07/03/03 0.00 1693.00 1693.00 1000 2299 AMERICAN HERITAGE LI M070303 CANCER INSURANCE N 20 6/14 -27/03 07/03/03 07/03/03 1101 113266 0.00 0.00 07/03/03 0.00 140.02 140.02 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 2589.67 2589.67 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 2589.67 2589.67 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE 2589.67 2589.67 t 1 F j RUN DATE 08/11/03 TIME 15:06:42 r w PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTTNG 08/13"C3 ',:I-Y 07- MOCRPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTIW; 7FRTDJ: 13/32 MANUA:• CFF.CK AC—V1 7Y FUND - - GvNEAA- FUND B*-*DG--7 '-*N:T ACCCUNT VENCOR IC)9 PJRCHASE 030E IRANSACT ?ROGRAM CASA ACCT SA' 7S TAX D-SC DATE Cl!-CX A CCNTROT, DESCRI?TION 7/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCC'-*NT CHECK NO USE .-Ax D-.SC NET PAVART F. 1000.-)11001"Do 3205 3A7�4' C'CONNELL S X CB/06/03 1101 0.0c :8/06/03 100.('13 MCF0603 CONF 07 7JNDS REY7-7 2C u2 AUCI': 08/or/03 -13526 '.00 0.00 ioo.c_l ICIAL FINANCE CHECK AM'. .3.00 TOTAL FTNANCE NEI PAYA31,E --(',TA:, GENERA- -L:.N:) ':*-'--CK AMT 100.2" TCTA: F"W' NET PAYAB ,E 100. "0 -RUN -)AT-:-- -2!!3/03 -.':YF. 10:30:46 ?FN7AvA-TON - z'UM) ACCCUNTNG 5 &/:3/03 C:TY OF XOORIARK, CA ACCOJNI'_NG PERIOD: 13/C2 MANJAL, CHECK ACTIVI."Y F::ND - 21J3 - CC7;MJNTTY WIDE 2UDG--7 JNI" ACCOUNT V' =NJOR 1099 PURCHASE ORJE '_RANSA::'= ?.-c034AX CASH ACC:' SALES TAX COA':20L DESCRIPTION 'I' /C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT C- :F.CX NO USE 'llu 21CC78CJ7022 3632 G= LMCRE, JAMES M. M 09/06/03 '101 O.00 M08C603 1-6/03 A /C_' EX ?ANS =C 20 7/28/0.'. 08 /JE /J3 :13583 O.CO TOTAL AV SPORTS F =3L 7S ^G?CK AMT OTAI. AV S.^OR"S NET PAYABLE ..0TA'.. COMMUNITY NT-)F. CSfdC3 AMT JCIA', CJMKJNIY %+iD= NET PAYAB'.F. F c. R::N DAT- C81-.3103 T -.ME 10:30:48 U ?AGE 2 D =SC DAT? CFFC< A`!'T D =SC AN.T ::3T PAYABLE 0'//28/03 7425.20 C.00 7425. ^0 PENTAMhT =ON - FUND AC, ^OUNTTNG /42S.00 74'25.00 7425.;; 7425... ^,0 ;8/13/03 CITY OF MCORPARK, CA ACCC ::NT =NG PLRIO7: 13102 MANTIAT- C33C3 ACTIVI'lY bUND - 26C3 - LCCAL ':RANST'OR:A•1'1ON 8A BUDGET JNIT ACCOUN" VENDOR 1099 PURCHASF 0"6.'L TRANSACT FROG -AM CASII ACCT SALES TAX CON'1ROL DESCRIPTION : /C INVOICE 0113 DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USF TAX 26038310800.2 964, :SOY AL:.AN SLURRY SEA N 2r,, ^,20209 -01 F Od/C6/03 1101 0.00 MO805O3 2003 S:.,;;RRY SEAT. -,RO 20 2252 08 /CC /03 1135£.5 0. JO TO-AT S',UR3Y c;-AL C17YWIDE CHECK AMT ^O.-Al, SLURRY SEAL CTTYWIDE NF'f _'AYALILE .01AL LOCAL :2A.VSPORTATION PA C *iFCK A`C: TOTAL LOCA:. TRANS ?0 ?TAT =CN 8A NET PAYABLE N' RIJN ";i,'I'F•: 06113103 T_ME - 0:30:49 .'AC, 3 DISC DATE CHECK AVT O -PC AMT NF.T PA''ART F. 07/07/03 125838.9" O.00 12238.9:; PLNTAYA_ :0N - F :;ND ACCOUNTTNG :25838.9 - 25838.90 125828.30 12588.90 :;il /13/v3 CITY CF MOORPARK. CA ACCOUKT -XC= P5H_CD: :3/02 MANJAL CHECK ACT -VTTY ?UND - 2701 - 71)=^G = :N1'1':LEMENT FUND B:;L',ET UNIT AC,7CJN1 V::NDOH ,99 PLRC -ASE CRDE TR:iNSACT PROGRAM CASE ACCT AL'd5 TAX DES,-TON T/C CCONTRCL I ?:VOI CHK -)ATE ACCCUNI' CHECK NO USE TAX 2701214 ^.0090 9 -02 3OYS h :? =31.5 CLUB OE N OS /06/03 1101 0.00 M080F "3 ROOi V.CRK REIABURSFM 20 (,71703 OS/06/03 1 -356! 0.:10 TOTAL, CDB�; C. =CK AMT AL C -)HG NET PAYABLE '!'GTAI. C'CBG ENTITLEMENT FUND ChLCK AMT .OTAL CD3-; EN'ITT ',=MEN'.' ETJND N2T PAYABLE' T:;TAL REPORT -. FF.C'< APir TOTAL RE.'0R':' NET PAYABLE v i i� RJN DATE OS /13/03 TTMF 10:3C:49 PACE 4 DISC DA'1'h CHECK AMT CISC AXT NET PAYAELE 07/:7/53 2COOC.00 O.00 2j000.00 ?F.NTAMATION - F;;ND ACC0JNTTNC 20)0,,'. C-0 20000.0'.' 20000.CC 20GC:.00 15 ? ?03.9G 15i363.i'0 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PFRIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHECK ACT.T.VITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /NOD INC HOUSE /TNC BUDC,F.T UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1079 PURCHASE ORDF TRANSACT PROGRAM. CAST! ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE. CHECK AMT CCNTRCL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE C!:K DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX D =SC AMT NET PAYABLE 290124200000 9223 MMASC 06/30/03 1101 0.00 06/04/03 -20.00 AP061103 6 /18- EMERGENT' PREPA 20 NANCY BURNS 06/11/03 1:3043 V 0.00 0.00 -20.00 ?O':AI. MRA HOUSING CHECK AXT -20.00 TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET 7A.YA3LE -20.00 TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUS3 /INC CHECK AMT -20.00 .OTAL MRA I,CW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE -20.00 \f / C ) RUN --ATE 07/28/03 TIME. 1'/:14:37 PF.NT,AMATION FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 13/02 MANUAL CHFCK ACTIVITY FUND - 29C2 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER SUDGET UNI- ACCOUNT VFNDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACC': SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHFCK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 290224100000 9223 MMASC N 06/30/03 110: 0.00 06/04/03 -75.00 A ?061 =03 PRE -CONF RFGISTRATIO 20 J HERNANDEZ 06/11/03 113043 V 0.00 0.00 -75.00 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT -75.00 TOTAL MRA ECONOM =C DEVELOPMENT NET PAYARLE TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT -75.00 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE -75.00 TOTA:, REPORT CHECK AMT -95.00 TOTAL REPORT NEI' PAYABL3 -95.00 c9 c, l.) RUN DA"--- 07/28/03 TIME 17:14:37 PENTANATICN - FUND ACCOUNTING PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 113271 1101 07/09/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 113271 1101 07/09/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 113281. TOTAL CHECK 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113272 1101 07/09/03 2935 ACCU AIR GASSES & EQUIPME 9205 113273 1101 07/09/03 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 113274 :101 07/09/03 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9252 113275 1101 07/09/03 1012 ACCURATE WELDING 9208 113275 1101 07/09/03 1012 ACCURATE WELDING 9252 113275 1101 07/09/03 1012 ACCURATE WELDING 9205 113281 TOTAL CHECK 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 11 3276 1101 07/09/03 2386 AGRX 9204 113277 1101 07/09/03 1029 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIA 9221 113278 1101 07/09/03 1030 AMERICAN RED CROSS 9244 113279 i101 07/09/03 2925 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & S 9208 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113260 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 '- -101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 113280 1101 07/09/03 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 2734 2755 3806 2755 2755 2734 3806 3806 3806 2734 2755 2734 ------- DESCRIPTION ------- SZABO-WK END 6/27 SZABO -WK END 6/20 AVRC HELIUM TANK RNTL 7 /03FAX & ANSWERING MTN MEADOWS PRK MAINT GRINDER BENCH STEEL AVCP RR DOOR PLATES AVCP WELL PUMP REPAIR RONSTAR & ROUNDUP 7 /03- 6 /04BOBARDT DUES CPR & FIRST AID TRAIN VECTOR ANIMAL TRAPS 6 /03FACILITIES PAGER 6 /03MRA PAGER 6 /03AVRC PAGER 6/03C COUNCIL PAGERS 6 /03PRKNG ENF PAGER 6 /03PRKS PAGER 6 /03PW PAGERS 6/03C MGR PAGER 6 /03EMRGNCY SRV PAGER 6/03C CLERK PAGER WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE WALNUT CYN PRECISE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE WALNUT CYN ALIGNMENT WALNUT CYN PRECISE WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE NRTH PRK ADMIN REVENU WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE NORTH PRK VILLAGE NRTH PRK ADMIN FEE 3221 REFUND -HOME OCCUPATIO 3210 REFUND - BUSINESS REGIS 9103 6 /03MILEAGE REIMBURSE 9205 4 CASES BIO BAGS DOG WAST PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 AMOUNT 900.00 720.00 1,620.00 15.19 68.80 30.48 9.76 37.54 25.00 72.30 318.08 277.00 350.00 110.04 5.53 4.57 11.11 56.91 5.53 9.14 10.10 30.24 4.10 6.02 143.25 921.74 6,144.94 - 921.74 5,930.00 1,800.00 270.00 - 270.00 - 889.50 - 666.10 889.50 4,440.66 666.10 18,315.60 86.00 30.00 118.00 10.80 600.00 TOTAL CHECK 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281. 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, 113281 1101 07/09/03 1039 AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES, TOTAL CHECK 13282 1101 07/09/03 3609 BEKEKEFFY, FOU7,IA 1 13282 1101 07/09/03 3609 BEKEKEFFY, FOUZIA (' TOTAL CHECK A3283 L) 1101 07/09/03 1054 BELLASALMA, TONY 0(3284 1101 07/09/03 3593 BIOGROUP USA 2734 2755 3806 2755 2755 2734 3806 3806 3806 2734 2755 2734 ------- DESCRIPTION ------- SZABO-WK END 6/27 SZABO -WK END 6/20 AVRC HELIUM TANK RNTL 7 /03FAX & ANSWERING MTN MEADOWS PRK MAINT GRINDER BENCH STEEL AVCP RR DOOR PLATES AVCP WELL PUMP REPAIR RONSTAR & ROUNDUP 7 /03- 6 /04BOBARDT DUES CPR & FIRST AID TRAIN VECTOR ANIMAL TRAPS 6 /03FACILITIES PAGER 6 /03MRA PAGER 6 /03AVRC PAGER 6/03C COUNCIL PAGERS 6 /03PRKNG ENF PAGER 6 /03PRKS PAGER 6 /03PW PAGERS 6/03C MGR PAGER 6 /03EMRGNCY SRV PAGER 6/03C CLERK PAGER WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE WALNUT CYN PRECISE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE WALNUT CYN ALIGNMENT WALNUT CYN PRECISE WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE WALNUT CYN ADMIN REVE NRTH PRK ADMIN REVENU WALNUT CYN ADMIN FEE NORTH PRK VILLAGE NRTH PRK ADMIN FEE 3221 REFUND -HOME OCCUPATIO 3210 REFUND - BUSINESS REGIS 9103 6 /03MILEAGE REIMBURSE 9205 4 CASES BIO BAGS DOG WAST PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 AMOUNT 900.00 720.00 1,620.00 15.19 68.80 30.48 9.76 37.54 25.00 72.30 318.08 277.00 350.00 110.04 5.53 4.57 11.11 56.91 5.53 9.14 10.10 30.24 4.10 6.02 143.25 921.74 6,144.94 - 921.74 5,930.00 1,800.00 270.00 - 270.00 - 889.50 - 666.10 889.50 4,440.66 666.10 18,315.60 86.00 30.00 118.00 10.80 600.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 0'1/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE. ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113285 1101 07/09/03 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 TRK #18 REPLACE TIRES 177.73 113285 1101 07/09/03 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 #2 FRONT TIRES,BALANC 204.48 TOTAL CHECK 382.21 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9103 PEACH HILL PARK: 1,050.00 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9103 COLLEGE VIEW PARK: 1,400.00 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9103 POINDEXTER PARK: 1,105.00 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9103 CAMPUS CANYON PARK: 1,400.00 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9303 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS PARK: 1,400.00 113286 1101 07/09/03 2566 BRUCE LINDSEY PAINTING 9103 CAMPUS PARK: 1,450.00 TOTAL CHECK 7,805.00 113287 1101 07/09/03 3611 CAFARO, ROBYN 3862 REFUND - FITNESS COMBO 67.00 113288 1101 07/09/03 3608 CALCOMP GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS 9232 EOC MAP SALES TAX 17.73 113289 1101 07/09/03 3150 CALIFORNIA CD IMAGING CEN 9103 SCANNING,F.DITING,OCR 1,349.58 113290 1101 07/09/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9103 93.130- 5 /03LENNAR SIG 382.00 113291 1101 07/09/03 2158 CHUNKIM MANAGEMENT, INC. 9102 MPK MOBILEHOME PARK 27.46 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9208 CLOCK SIGNAL CONTROLL 10.71 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9204 VECTOR DRY ICE 20.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 SR CTR CRAFT SUPPLIES 9.07 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 POINDEXTER DEED RECOR 6.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 HF.RNANDEZ- WORKFORCE I 40.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9202 COMPUTER PARTS 6.42 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 SR CTR FATHERS DAY EV 18.26 113292 1101 07/09/03 112'1 CITY OF MOORPARK 9251 PW GAS TANK CLEANER 20.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 LICENSE PLATE & TITLE 14.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 22.65 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9236 DMV REPORTS 35.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 SR CTR CARD STOCK 12.70 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9220 SR CTR ALZHEIMER BOOK 32.17 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9244 AVRC PLAY DAY VIDEO 4.06 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 MORGENSTERN -MSA MTG 21.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9202 KITCHEN BRUSH 5.35 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 GILBERT -APWA MTG 20.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9225 GILBERT -CAL TRANS MTG 13.50 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9224 MCCAFFERTY- MILEAGE RE 4.32 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 SR CTR SUPPLIES 12.01 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9244 AVRC LUAU SUPPLIES 28.45 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9241 20TH ANNIV CENTERPIEC 21.27 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9236 DMV REPORTS 10.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9204 VECTOR DRY ICE 21..65 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9205 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 34.70 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9244 CAMP MPK SUPPLIES 50.00 113292 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 BORCHARD -CSMFO MTG 20.00 113292 \ r 1101 07/09/03 1127 CITY OF MOORPARK 9223 BURNS -MMASC MTG 20.00 ( j TOTAL CHECK 533.29 113293 a c.i li01 07/09/03 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 IRRIGATION CLOCK REPL 1,000.00 113293 1101 07/09/03 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 IRRIGATION CLOCK RF.PL 328.48 E TOTAL CHECK 1,328.98 C� PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA -"IME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND PAGE NUMBER: 3 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113294 1101 07/09/03 1143 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GR 9630 AVCP SPORTS FIELD DES 3,683.77 113295 1101 07/09/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 HP DIRECT NETWORK INT 213.43 113295 1101 07/09/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 APC MODULAR PLUGS 18.77 113295 110'- 07/09/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 HP LASERJET 333OMFP PRINT 696.05 113295 1101 07/09/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9203 NETWORK CARD FOR HP LASER 170.53 TOTAL. CHECK 1,098.78 113296 110: 07/09/03 1147 CONEJO VALLEY ADULT SCH00 9222 EXPLORING THE INTERNET (B 125.00 113297 1101 07/09/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 197.77 113297 1101 07/09/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 41.73 113297 1101 07/09/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PRKNG ENF OFFICE SUPP 26.79 113297 1101 07/09/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM SRVC OFFICE SUPP 12.41 113297 1101 07/09/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL OFFICE SUPP 199.79 TOTAL CHECK 478.49 113298 1101 07/09/03 1184 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 9244 CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR CAMP M 596.14 113299 1101 07/09/03 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9301 PW MARKING PAINT 39.90 113299 1'_01 07/09/03 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY COR 9310 PW COLD PATCH 112.51 TOTAL CHECK 152.41 113300 1101 07/09/03 1690 DOYLE SHAW ICE 9204 VECTOR DRY ICE 16.00 113301 1101 07/09/03 1196 DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 REPAINT TRASH CANS,CU 338.82 113331 1101 07/09/03 1196 DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9204 PARKS PAINT SUPPLIES 291.95 113301 1101 07/09/03 1196 DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 AVCP PAINT SUPPLIES 75.05 113301 1101 07/09/03 1196 DUNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 PEACH HILL PAINT SUPP 75.04 TOTAL CHECK 780.86 113302 1101 07/09/03 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 3806 PORTER -DAHL TAYLOR -2.03 113302 1101 07/09/03 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2733 PORTER -DAHL TAYLOR 13.51 113302 1.01 07/09/03 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9231 SCZEPAN -OLD REPUBLIC 12.00 113302 1101 07/09/03 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2734 PORTER -DAHL TAYLOR 2.03 113302 1101 07/09/03 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9231 WILI.IAMS- STEGEMAN,KAS 12.00 TOTAL CHECK 37.51 113303 1101 07/09/03 3615 FODRAN, IRENE 2606 REFUND - SECURITY DEPOS 100.00 113304 1101 07/09/03 2831 FUENTES, TED 2611 REFUND- RENTAL DEPOSIT 450.00 113305 1101 07/09/03 1236 GALL'S INC 9303 RADAR TRAILER IMMOBIL 373.90 113306 1101 07/09/03 2901 GONZALES, BRYAN 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 30.00 113307 07/09/03 3618 GONZALEZ, JANET 2606 REFUND - SECURITY DEPOS 75.00 113308 X1101 ` x1101 07/09/03 3507 HANCOCK, JAMES 3404 REFUND -RENT OVERPAYME 160.98 t 113309 01101 07/09/03 2123 HIGH TECH SIGNS & BANNERS 9244 7/3 ADMISSION SIGNS 62.48 113310 1 )1101 07/09/03 2224 HILLYARD 9204 CLEANING SUPPLIES 388.22 113311 T1101 07/09/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 LUMBER - HORSESHOE PITS 62.21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/10/03 PAGE NUMBER: 4 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113311 1101 07/09/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PARKS CHAINSAW 245.60 TOTAL CHECK 307.81 113312 1101 07/09/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 COM FACIL CLEANING SU 30.03 113312 1101 07/09/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9252 AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIE 100.60 113312 1101 07/09/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9252 AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIE 187,90 113312 1101 07/09/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 COM FAC CLEANING SUPP 145.72 TOTAL, CHECK 464.25 113313 110: 07/09/03 3610 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCI 9221 CITY BLDG OFFICIAL 50.00 113314 1101 07/09/03 3170 KEISLER, JOHN R. 9630 4- 6 /03TREE CONS SRVCS 240.00 113314 1101 07/09/03 3170 KEISLER, JOHN R. 9102 4- 6 /03TREE CONS SRVCS 100.00 TOTAL CHECK 340.00 113315 1101 07/09/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 4 /03- 6 /03.7ANITORIAL 1,173.21 113316 1101 07/09/03 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 LA AVE SIGNAL INTERCO 2,703.00 113316 1101 07/09/03 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 TR RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4,438.50 TOTAL CHECK 7,141.50 113317 1101 07/09/03 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 WESTWOOD SIDEWALK 91..97 113318 1101 07/09/03 1326 L.A. LAWNMOWER 9251 WELDER CARD REBUILD 104.01 113318 1101 07/09/03 1326 L.A. LAWNMOWER 9251 WELDER CARB REBUILD 104.01 113318 1101 07/09/03 1326 L.A. LAWNMOWER 9208 CHAINSAW CASE 113318 1101 07/09/03 1326 L.A. LAWNMOWER 9204 CHAINSAW REPAIR 41.78 113318 1101 07/09/03 1326 L.A. LAWNMOWER 9251 CHAINSAW REPAIR 73.58 68,22 TOTAL CHECK 391.60 113319 1101 07/09/03 3280 LAWRENCE, KEITH 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 80.00 113320 1101 07/09/03 3144 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDER 9102 MUNI CODE SUPPLEMENT 711.23 113320 1101 07/09/03 3144 LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW 13F,NDER 9102 MUNI CODE SUPPLEMENTA TOTAL CHECK 43.08 754.31 113321 1101 07/09/03 3237 LOS ANGELES WHEELMAN GRAN 2606 REFUND - SECURITY DEPOS 250.00 113322 1101 07/09/03 1358 MARILYN'S TROPHIES 9205 PHOTO CONTEST AWARDS 59.41 113323 1101 07/09/03 3577 MARTIN'S FLAG COMPANY 9244 DISPLAY FLAG FOR FIREWORK 265.50 113323 1101 07/09/03 3577 MARTIN'S FLAG COMPANY 9244 FREIGHT -U.S. FLAG 6.96 TOTAL CHECK 272.46 113324 1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03VECTOR CAR WASH 8.00 113324 1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03MPK PD CAR WASH 282.00 113324 1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03PW ADMIN CAR WASH 50.52 113324 113324 �1101 1101 07/09/03 13'76 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03AVRC CAR WASH 80 \ 'l 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03X- GUARDS CAR WASH 4.00 113324 1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS 113324 1101 �.�1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 6 /03CEO CAR WASH 4.00 113324 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LOBE 9254 6 /03LANDS,LIGHT CAR W 8.00 113324 )1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBF. 9254 6 /03PARKS CAR WASH 2.00 113324 C --, 1101 07/09/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBF. 9254 6 /03PW OIL CHANGE 13.20 TOTAL CHECK 58.52 r j 431.04 PENTAY,ATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 5 DATE: 0'//10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113325 1101 0'7/09/03 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 6/25- 7 /22AVRC MINI BI 137.28 113326 1101 07/09/03 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9103 7 /03SR NEWSLETTER 160.87 113327 1101 07/09/03 3616 MORALES, MIGUEL 2606 REFUND - CAMPUS PARK 100.00 113328 1101 07/09/03 2428 MOSER, RYAN M. 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 113329 1101 07/09/03 1397 MR. T'S CUSTOM EMBROTDERY 9205 BIKE PATROL SHIRTS 102.96 113330 1101 07/09/03 2761 MSA 2003 9223 8/19 CONF & £QUIP SHO 395.00 113331 1101 07/09/03 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 #29 WIPER BLADES 10.77 113331 1101 07/09/03 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 PW WIPER BLADES 5.26 TOTAL CHECK 16.03 113332 1101 07/09/03 2724 OAKBROOK ENGRAVING & AWAR 9241 EMP REC PLATE ENGRAVI 30.03 113333 1101 07/09/03 1853 ON DUTY UNIFORMS & EQUIPM 9205 MPK PD UNIFORMS 134.06 113334 1101 07/09/03 3622 ON -STAGE RENTALS, INC. 9244 7/3 STARSHIP BACKLINE 1,230.00 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03ST MAINT PHONE 48.67 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03COMM SRVC PHONE 45.90 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03SR CTR PHONE 15.26 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03REC PHONE 64.37 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03FINANCE PHONE 14.42 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03MRA /ECO PHONE 1.89 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5/03C MGR PHONE 22.57 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03CITY HALL PHONE 692.01 113335 1101 07/09/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 5 /03CITY COUNCIL PHON 1.1.06 TOTAL CHECK 916.15 113336 1101 07/09/03 1793 PEDERSEN FENCE & PATIO CO 9252 CHAIN LINK TOP TO EXISTIN 784.00 113337 1101 07/09/03 3619 PEREZ, VERA 3866 REFUND - SUMMER CAMP 321.00 113338 1101 07/09/03 3614 PEREZ, VICTORIA 2606 REFUND- SECURITY DEPOS 100.00 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 BUSINESS REG RECEIPTS 638.14 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9202 CHUDOBA BUSINESS CARD 54.70 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2733 WM LYON HOMES 37.38 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2734 WM LYON ADMIN FEE 27.08 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2734 MAYFLOWER MKT CPD 74.75 :13339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2734 MAYFLOWER ADMIN FEE 11.21 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2733 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 180.50 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 3806 MAYFLOWER ADMIN REVEN -11.21 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 3806 WM LYON ADMIN REVENUE -27.08 11.3339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2733 MIRAGLIA TPM 5394 74.75 1.13339 ` " 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 2734 MIRAGLIA ADMIN FEE 11.21 113339 113339 1101 1101 07/09/03 07/09/03 1451 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 3806 2734 MIRAGLIA ADMIN REVENU WM LYON ADMIN FEE -11.21 5.61 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 PD SHIPMENT TO RHF 18.96 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 3806 WM LYON ADMIN REVENUE -5.61 113339 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 7 /03SR NEWSLETTER PRI 477.80 113339 i ) 1101 07/09/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9601 FLINN AVE REALIGNMENT 38.87 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 07/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 1,595.85 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 24.10 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 36.95 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 36.95 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 65.78 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 44.57 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 44.56 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 21.72 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 44.56 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 18.12 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 18.12 113340 1101 07/09/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 1.8.12 TOTAL CHECK 394.03 113341 110: 07/09/03 1472 QUINN ENGINE SYSTEMS, INC 9251 GENERATOR REPAIR 600.81 113342 1101 07/09/03 1475 R.H.F., INC 9251 LASER ALIGN,CALIBRATI 87.00 113343 1101 07/09/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 AVRC CLASS SUPPLIES 11.96 113343 1101 07/09/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9241 20TH ANN1V CAKE. 50.99 TOTAL CHECK 62.95 113344 1101 07/09/03 2564 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO 9211 MONTE VISTA TRACTOR R 135.14 113344 1101 07/09/03 2564 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO 9211 AVCP TRACTOR RENTAL 135.14 TOTAL CHECK 270.28 113345 1101 07/09/03 3103 RIDER, RICH 9160 BASKETBALL CAMP INSTR 1,315.80 113346 1101 07/09/03 3621 ROMERO, HUM82RTO 2611 REFUND - RENTAL DEPOSIT 275.00 113347 1101 07/09/03 3574 RUIZ ENGINEERING, INC. 9640 2003 ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJ 165,253.37 113348 1101 07/09/03 2820 SCE 9413 7 /03PREV NOT BILLED 1,551.79 113349 1101 07/09/03 3613 SCHIMELPFENING, JOAN 3866 REFUND -CAMP MPK 42.00 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03PARKS FUEL 141.73 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03X- GUARDS FUEL 7.52 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03VECTOR FUEL 45.56 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03LANDS & LIGHT FUE 17.04 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03AVRC FUEL 6.82 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03CEO FUEL 16.88 113350 1101 07/09/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 5 /03PRKNG ENF FUEL 11.28 TOTAL CHECK 246.83 113351 1101 07/09/03 1513 SHILTS CONSULTANTS INC 9102 03 /04ADMIN ASSESSMENT 4,181.52 113352 1101 07/09/03 3617 SIERRA, LILIA 2606 REFUND - SECURITY DEPOS 100.00 113353 C 1101 07/09/03 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 REMOVE &INSTALL SIGNAL 3,571.25 113354 1101 07/09/03 1515 SIMI PACIFIC BLDG. MATERI 9252 PAVILION REPAIR 63.45 i1 113355 1101 07/09/03 1997 STMT VALLEY HOSPITAL 9222 BACK SAFETY CLASS 125.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 0- //10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:08:46 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 7000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -- - - - - -- - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113355 1101 07/09/03 1997 SIMI VALLEY HOSPITAL 9222 BACK SAFETY CLASS 125.00 TOTAI, CHECK 250.00 113356 1101 C7/09/03 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9103 RESTROOM DOOR LOCK RE 173.79 113357 1101 07/09/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR -7/3 EVENT SUPP 95.01 113357 1101 07/09/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR HOSPITALITY 146.51 113357 1101 0. 7/09/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 CAMP MPK SUPPLIES 133.36 113357 1101 07/09/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 68.06 113357 3.101 07/09/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR 7/3 EVENT 106.68 TOTAL CHECK 549.62 113358 1101 07/09/03 3467 SUB -ZERO EXCAVATING, INC. 9640 2002 RAMPS AT "T" INTERS£ 12,933.14 113358 1101 07/09/03 3467 SUB -ZERO EXCAVATING, INC. 9640 2002 RAMPS AT "T" INTERSE 12,933.14 TOTAL CHECK 25,866.28 113359 1101 07/09/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9103 COUNTRY TRAIL MEDIANS 100.00 113359 1101 07/09/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9103 AVCP WELL PIPE REPAIR 332.13 113359 1101 07/09/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 HIGH ST WEED ABATEMEN 500.00 113359 1101 07/09/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 BOCCE BALL CT IRRIGAT 950.00 113359 1101 07/09/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 'L10 SEED SLOPE 42.84 TOTAL CHECK 1,924.97 113360 1101 07/09/03 1658 TARGET 9240 20TH ANNIV SUPPLIES 101.66 113360 1101 07/09/03 1658 TARGET 5244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 58.06 113360 1101 07/09/03 1658 TARGET 9240 20TH ANNIV SUPPLIES 31.71 TOTAL CHECK 191.43 113361 1101 07/09/03 3361 TAYLOR, JANE RUTH 9103 6 /03STRENGTH TRAINING 83.25 11.3361 3101 07/09/03 3361 TAYLOR, JANE RUTH 9102 6 /03BEG STRENGTH TRNG 111.00 TOTAL CHECK 194.25 113362 1101 07/09/03 1566 TELCOM INC 9205 MOTOROLA DESKTOP CHARGER- 1,195.23 113363 1101 07/09/03 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 PD BIKE SUPPLIES 195.57 113364 1101 07/09/03 1591 TROPHIES FTC 9240 MPK PD PLATE & ENGRAV 48.71 113364 1101 07/09/03 1591 'TROPHIES ETC 9244 2 EXPRESS PLATES 11.80 113364 1101 07/09/03 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 2 EXPRESS PLATES 11.80 113364 1101 07/09/03 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 7/3 HOSPITALITY BANDS 298.81 TOTAL CHECK 371.12 113365 1101 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03PW ADMIN FUEL 33.58 113365 3101 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03MPK PD FUEL 28.42 113365 1101 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03AVRC FUEL 115.04 1133G5 1101 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03PW STREETS FUEL 590.13 113365 1103 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03VECTOR FUEL 153.98 113365 110'_ 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03TPAFFIC ENF FUEL 39.88 313365 110'_ 07/09/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 5 /03PARKS FUEL 215.70 113365 (') 1101 07/09/03 1600 UN10N 76 9255 5/03X- GUARDS FUEL 26.58 Y TOTAL CHECK 1,203.31 113366 �,� 1101 07/09/03 1599 UNIVERSAI. REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 FLINN AVE REALIGNMENT 41.96 113366 1 1101 07/09/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9632 METROLINK LANDSCAPING 11.54 TOTAL CHECK 53.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 6/03 Z12 LANDSCAPE SR 3,778.50 02/03 RDA PASSTHROUGH DATE: 07/10/03 02/03 RDA PASSTHROUGH 1,028,062.82 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 12:08:46 352.72 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 18.00 CHECK REGISTER 9.00 FUND - 3000 - GENERAL FUND 63.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 126.00 CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED ------- - - - - -- - VENDOR ---- --- - - - - -- ACCT 113367 1101 07/09/03 2283 VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331 113368 1101 07/09/03 1158 VENTURA COUNTY 1.304 113368 1101 07/09/03 1158 VENTURA COUNTY 9270 33.53 TOTAL CHECK MPK PD OPERATING SUPP 2.46 113369 1101 07/09/03 1160 VENTURA COUNTY 9212 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 113370 1101 07/09/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL 41100 9251 TOTAL CHECK 113371 1101 07/09/03 2328 VENTURA COUNTY WATERSHED 9103 113372 1101 07/09/03 1624 VILLAGE VIEW LIGHTING, IN 9252 113373 1101 07/09/03 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9630 113373 1101 07/09/03 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 TOTAL CHECK 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 113374 1101 07/09/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9208 TOTAL CHECK 113375 1101 07/09/03 2638 WIRELESSGUYS, INC. 9504 113375 1101 07/09/03 2638 WIRELESSGUYS, INC. 9504 113375 1101 07/09/03 2638 WIRELESSGUYS, INC. 9504 TOTAL CHECK 113376 1101 07/09/03 1731 WM. L. MORRIS CHEVROLET 9254 113377 1101 07/09/03 2843 WOLCO 9203 113377 1101 07/09/03 2843 WOLCO 9203 113377 1101 07/09/03 2843 WOLCO 9203 1133'/ -/ 1101 07/09/03 2843 WOLCO 9203 TOTAL CHECK 113378 1101 07/09/03 2295 XP SYSTEMS 3865 113379 1101 07/09/03 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 113379 1101 07/09/03 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 TOTAL CHECK (a TOTAL FUND J j TOTAL REPORT c t PAGE NUMBER: 8 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - -- -- AMOUNT 6/03 Z12 LANDSCAPE SR 3,778.50 02/03 RDA PASSTHROUGH - 22,015.67 02/03 RDA PASSTHROUGH 1,028,062.82 1,006,047.15 7 /03VECTOR LEASE WALN 352.72 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 18.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 9.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 40.50 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 63.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 126.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 9.00 REPEATER ACCESS 5/03 184.50 450.00 CLEAN BUSINESS INSPEC 240.00 CITY HALL LIGHT REPAI 79.79 AVCP PHASE II PEPPERS 1,928.05 CITYWIDE TREE SERVICE 7,612.50 9,540.55 PW SMALL TOOLS 16.86 PW OPERATING SUPPLIES 29.41 PW NOZZLE GUN 4.62 PW SMALL TOOLS 33.53 PW SMALL TOOLS 16.60 MPK PD OPERATING SUPP 2.46 103.68 VECTOR LAN,PHONE,INST 2,804.00 VECTOR LAN,PHONE,INST 1,602.29 VECTOR LAN,PHONE,INST 2,269.91 6,676.20 #5 REAR DRUMS INSPECT 40.00 5/17- 6 /17CH COPIES 218.35 5 /17- 6 /17ANNEX COPIES 114.79 5 /17- 6 /17POSTAGE AREA 128.34 5/19- 6/19PW COPIES 70.05 531.53 REFUND -ADLT SFTBL 380.00 NO TRUCKS SIGNS 233.27 ARROW SIGNS 25.10 258.37 1,299,066.26 1,299,066.26 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/10/C3 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:10:17 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 4,467.28 1000 GENERAL FUND 19,862.19 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 206.58 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 5,851.82 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 592.52 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 8,378.10 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 1,042.84 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 3,778.50 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 19,916.92 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 2,783.83 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. 4,438.50 2602 TDA ARTICLE 3 12,933.14 2603 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A 1'18,186.51 2604 TEA 21 FEDERAL GRANTS 11.54 2605 GAS TAX 6,436.72 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 208.44 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER - 21,469.21 3900 MRA AREA 1 DEBT SERVICE 1,028,062.82 4003 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN 1,602.29 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 9.00 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 1,450.00 6076 MAYFLOWER MKT 85.96 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 15,956.18 6513 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 15.54 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 5,106.76 6638 WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC. 250.57 6653 L &D MIRAGLIA FAMILY 85.96 TOTAL REPORT 1,299,066.26 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:51 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CAST! ACCT DATE ISSUED ------ - - - - -- - VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 6 /03REPLACEMENT CELLP 79.73 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03MORGENSTERN CELLP 32.54 113407 110, 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6/03H RILEY CELLPHONE 16.22 113507 110. 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03MPK PD CELLPHONES 502.53 113407 1101 0'7/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03TRAFFENSTEDT CELT, 10.94 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03GILBERT CELLPHONE 8.96 113407 110: 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03WALTER CELLPHONE 19.77 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6/03M RILEY CFLLPHONE 14.44 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03BORCHARD CELLPHON 30.17 113407 110i 07,/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03KUENY CELLPHONE 8.54 113407 1101 07/30/03 1.003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03HOGAN CELLPHONE 17.02 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03HUNTER CELLPHONE 32.88 113407 li01 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03AVRC CELLPHONE 16.66 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03LINDLEY CELLPHONE 9.48 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03JOHNSTON CELLPHON 60.03 113407 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03CHUDOBA CELLPHONE 10.81 TOTAL CHECK 870.72 1 -3406 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 C MGR & ACM PHONES 786.19 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6/03H RILEY CELLPHONE 4.71 113408 110'- 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03KUENY CELLPHONE 3.62 =13408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03LINDLEY CELLPHONE 5.64 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 LINDLEY CELLPHONE 218.23 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03HOGAN CELLPHONE 3.84 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 HOGAN CELLPHONE 262.27 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9208 GILBERT CELLPHONE 250.02 113408 1101 07/30/03 1003 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 6 /03GILBERT CELLPHONE 4.68 TOTAL CHECK 1,539.20 113409 1101 07/30/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 7/4 663.75 113410 1101 07/30/03 2935 ACCU AIR GASSES & EQUIPME 9205 HELIUM TANK RENTAL 4.41 113411 1101 07/30/03 2837 ACCU- PRINTS 9236 6/03 FINGERPRINTS -3 30.00 113412 1101 07/30/03 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9252 AVCP PAINT SUPPLIES 24.67 113412 1101 07/30/03 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9208 TRAILER HITCH PIN 6.97 TOTAL CHECK 31.64 113413 1101 07/30/03 2925 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & S 9204 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLI 287.47 113414 1101 07/30/03 1037 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER 9204 6 /03VECTOR WATER 24.80 113414 1101 07/30/03 1037 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER 9205 6 /03CH BREAKROOM SUPP 133.09 TOTAL CHECK 157.89 113415 1101 07/30/03 1038 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYST 9211 4- 6 /03POSTAGE METER 249.53 113416 1101 07/30/03 2860 B.T.R. INC. 9244 6/13 TEEN EVENT PIZZA 135.00 113417 1101 07/30/03 3632 BAUM, TOM 3301 REFUND -CIT# 171664 50.00 113418 i 1101 07/30/03 2299 BOB BROOKS, SHERIFF BUSTN 9236 5 /03FINGERPRINTS -4 40.00 113419 1103 07/30/03 1067 BOGOYEVAC, PETE 9244 ADLT SOFTBALL FEES 60.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0155- 5 /03USA -12.60 kA PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:51 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WIL.LIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01359- 0145- 5 /03MISSIO 138.70 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0153- 5 /03CH PRJ 6,447.66 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359- 01.55- 5 /03USA 12.60 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0157 -5/03N PRK 486.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359 - 0102- 5 /03TR -29.40 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSF. 2734 01359- 0157 -5/03N PRK 72.90 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359-0103- 5 /03COM SR 28.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 3803 01359- 0157 -5/03N PRK -72.90 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0102- 5 /03TR 196.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536- 0149- 5 /03ANAYA 319.32 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 5 /03RETAIN 663.68 113420 110'- 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 5 /03RETAIN 117.12 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLTAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0098- 5 /03HR /PER 1,219.20 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01536- 0001- 5 /03CE:O 414.54 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 5 /03RETAIN 1,630.17 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9121 01359- 0001- 5 /03RETAIN 287.68 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2754 01359- 0155- 5 /03USA 84.00 1:3420 1101 0'7/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536- 0040- 5 /03LUCAS 1,005.81 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536 - 0041- 5 /03GARCIA 1,581.81 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536- 0146- 5 /03MACNEI 321.65 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0098- 5 /03HR /PER 2,169.80 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536- 0147- 5 /03BERMUD 851.60 1' -3420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 2734 01359 - 0102- 5 /03TR 29.40 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0102- 5 /03CONM D 42.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9123 01536- 0148- 5 /03WELBAT 208.00 113420 1101 07/30/03 1083 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSE 9122 01359- 0099- 5 /03CRA 56.87 TOTAL CHECK 18,269.61 113421 1101 07/30/03 1903 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT 9223 03 RDA INSTITUTE CANC 70.00 113422 1101 07/30/03 3576 CATHOLIC CHARITIES 9285 IMPROVEMENT GRANT -FIN 12,300.00 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9147 6 /03NON- RESIDENT PERM 4,202.05 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9146 6 /03RESIDENTIAL PERMI 12,204.48 113423 11C1 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9143 6 /03PLAN CHECK RESIDE 3,807.85 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CILARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 6 /03TOTAL BILLABLE FE - 23,252.57 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2106 6 /03TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 49,495.25 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9144 6 /03PLAN CHECK NON RE 2,734.40 113423 1101 07/30/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9148 6 /03OCCUPANCY INVESTI 303.79 TOTAL CHECK 49,495.25 1:3424 1101 07/30/03 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 GLENWOOD PRK IRRIGATI 192.85 113425 1101 0'1/30/03 1878 COMMAND PERFORMANCE CATER 9205 20TH ANNIV MTG 299.96 113425 1101 07/30/03 1878 COMMAND PERFORMANCE CATER 9240 20TH ANNIV EMP RECOGN 1,800.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,099.96 113426 1101 07/30/03 1144 COMPUWAVF. 9205 CS REMOTE CONTROL 138.35 113426 1101 07/30/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 ADMIN REMOTE CONTROL 138.35 113426 1101 07/30/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 WINDOWS 03 SERVER 962.00 113426 1101 07/30/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 CITY CLERK MONITOR 492.28 113426 1101 07/30/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 CITY CLERK 22" MONITO 492.28 TOTAL CHECK 2,223.26 113427 1101 07/30/03 1904 CSMFO 9236 ACCT TECH AD 80.00 PENTAd1ATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/30/03 PAGE NUMBER: 3 TIME: 10:01:51 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C CLERK SUPPLIES 8.71 11.3428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR SUPPLIES 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 SR CTR SUPPLIES 6.68 :13428 1:01 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV SUPPLIES 55.49 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW SUPPLIES 32.05 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC SUPPLIES 36.04 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE SUPPLIES 167.45 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV SUPPLIES 405.31 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C CLERK SUPPLIES 5.58 92.96 113428 1101 07/30/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 PAPER SUPPLIES TOTAL CHECK 144.73 955.00 113429 1101 07/30/03 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 6/03 FINGERPRINT -3 113429 i101 07/30/03 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 5 /03FINGERPRINT APPS 96.00 32.00 113429 1101 07/30/03 2226 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9236 5 /03FINGERPRINT APPS TOTAL CHECK 416.00 544.00 113430 1101 07/30/03 1690 DOYLE SHAW ICE 9204 VECTOR DRY ICE 16.00 113431 1101 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALLIANT 9233 2003 -55 W CASSAR 113431 li01 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALLIANT 9233 2003 -54 K PATEL 82.50 113431 1101 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALLIANT 9233 2003 -50 A ARASTU 115.00 113431 1101 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALI.IANT 9233 2003 -51 N HTJAZ 115.00 113431 1101 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALLIANT 9233 2003 -53 J LOZANO 82.50 113431 1101 07/30/03 1489 DRIVER ALLIANT 9233 2003 -52 T FUENTES 115.00 TOTAL CHECK 82.50 592.50 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 444.07 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 401.11 1,284.99 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 269.65 1.13432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 498.94 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 666.77 113432 1101 07/30/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR CA 1,236.26 TOTAL CHECK 4,801.79 113433 1101 07/30/03 1212 ENGRAVING WIZARD 9205 S KROES NAMEPLATE 12.11 113434 1101 07/30/03 1231 FOX CANYON GROUNDWATER 9415 AVCP WELL USAGE 85.98 _13435 1101 07/30/03 3636 GILLMAN, PAULA 3865 REFUND - WOMENS SOFTBAL 39.00 113436 1101 07/30/03 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 LAND ACQUISITION 735.00 113436 1i01 07/30/03 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 2792 GRIMES CANYON ROAD WIDENI 2,060.00 113436 1101 07/30/03 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 SPRING ROAD WIDENING 517.50 TOTAL CHECK 3,312.50 113437 1101 07/30/03 3598 HARRIS AND ASSOCIATES 9103 GASB 34 SYS IMPLEMENT 2,499.00 113438 `>'' 1101 07/30/03 2324 JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ 9224 RDA INST MILEAGE 113438 1101 07/30/03 2324 JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ 9225 RDA INST MEAI,S,PRKNG 54.00 C.! TOTAL CHECK 106.00 a 160.00 113439 , 1101 07/30/03 1275 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & 9102 1ST 03 QTR SALES TAX 900.00 113440 1101 07/30/03 3306 ROGAN, BARRY K. 9221 6 /03ROTARY DUES Cj 70.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/30/03 PAGE NUMBER: 4 TIME: 10:01:51 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113441 1101 07/30/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 PARKS TOOLS 385.77 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9205 FINANCE MISC EXPENSES 109.92 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9205 5/28 CC MTG SUPPLIES 30.77 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 LEAGUE OF CA PUBLICAT 30.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9102 5/03 EZ2 INTERNET SRV 45.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 STATE OF THE CITY MTG 300.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9103 NATOA -SCAN CONFERENCE 125.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9222 CCAPA 03 CONF -HOGAN 335.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9222 CCAPA 03 CONF- BOBARDT 335.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 SUBDIVISION MAP ACT 340.00 123442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9241 RAINBOW FLORIST 50.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9222 PLAYGROUND SAFETY INS 135.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9244 TEEN TRAVEL CAMP TRIP 2,429.51 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 ACM & CHAMBER MTG 21.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 CM PD SRVCS PANEL 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 ASSOC OF RECORD MGRS 40.81 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9220 03 VTA CTY STAR SUBSC 42,41 154.00 113442 1101 07/30/03 2529 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SER 9223 6 /6MPK CHAMBER MTG TOTAL CHECK 10.00 4,533.92 113443 1101 07/30/03 2826 J.C. CONSTRUCTION 9103 REMOVE CONCRETE CAPS AND 3,000.00 :13444 '_101 07/30/03 3637 JABANA, VERONICA 3862 REFUND -SALSA CLASS 50.00 113445 1101 07/30/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2754 SHEA HOMES LEGAL 1,530.00 113445 1101 07/30/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 SHEA ADMIN REVENUE - 229.50 113445 1101 07/30/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 SHEA ADMIN FEE 229.50 TOTAL CHECK 1,530.00 113446 1101 07/30/03 3638 KATHY'S CRITTERS 9244 6 /24CMP MPK EVENT 345.00 113447 1101 07/30/03 1327 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 9208 EDSAL 72 DRAWER BIN SHELV -36.61 113447 1101 07/30/03 1327 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 9204 EDSAL 72 DRAWER BIN SHELV -31.65 113447 1101 07/30/03 1327 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 9204 FREIGHT - SHELVING SYS 65.51 113447 1101 07/30/03 1327 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 9204 EDSAL 72 DRAWER BIN SHELV 133.65 113447 110: 07/30/03 1327 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 9204 FREIGHT - SHELVING SYS -15.51 113447 1101 07/30/03 1127 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY TNC 9208 EDSAL 72 DRAWER BIN SHELV 154.61 TOTAL CHECK 270.00 113148 1101 07/30/03 3183 LAMPPOST PIZZA 9244 JBL PIZZA PARTY 520.00 113449 1101 07/30/03 1344 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL P 9252 FREIGHT FOR BLK RUBBER MA 63.77 113449 1101 07/30/03 1344 LITTLE TTKES COMMERCIAL P 9252 BLACK 2.35 "(60M) THICK T 495.48 113449 1101 07/30/03 1344 LITTI,F. TIKES COMMERCIAL P 9205 FREIGHT FOR BLK RUBBER MA 63.77 113449 1101 07/30/03 1344 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL P 9205 BLACK 2.35 "(60MN) THICK T 330.96 113449 113449 1101 07/30/03 1344 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL P 9252 PLAYGROUND SLIDE REPLACEM 2,008.12 110i 07/30/03 1344 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL P 9252 FREIGHT -PLAY EQUIPMNT 106.80 TOTAL CHECK s 3,068.90 113450 1101 07/30/03 3640 MARINEZ, JESUS 2606 REFUND - SECURITY DEPOS 75.00 113451 11101 07/30/03 2668 MEEHAN, CHAD 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 50.00 113452 11101 07/30/03 2091 MINIBLINDERS, MOORPARK 9206 AVCP VERTICAL f VANES 110.80 • t PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DACE: 07/30/03 PAGE NUMBER: 5 TIME: 10:01:51 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH. ACCT DATE ISSUED ------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113453 1101 07/30/03 1912 MMASC 9223 PRE -CONF WORKSHOP REG 75.00 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 REIMBURSABLES (NOT TO EXC 16.88 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 REIMBURSABLES (NOT TO EXC 16.88 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 PROJECT CLOSE -OUT 77.65 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 PROJECT CLOSE. -OUT 77.65 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION/ 508.68 11.3454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 945.34 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 945.34 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT S 112.54 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 SURVEYING & MATERIALS TES 281.35 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT S 112.54 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 SURVEYING & MATERIALS TES 281.35 113454 1101 07/30/03 3524 MNS ENGINEERING, INC. 9650 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION/ 508.68 TOTAL CHECK 3,884.88 113455 1101 07/30/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 6 /03MPK PD FUEL 113455 1101 07/30/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 6 /03PW STREETS FUEL 96,74 113455 1101 07/30/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 6 /03X- GUARDS FUEL 5.48 113455 1101 07/30/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 6 /03PW ADMIN FUEL 7,75 113455 1101 07/30/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 6 /03PRKNG ENF FUEL 5.48 TOTAL CHECK 7,75 123.20 113456 1101 07/30/03 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 6 /20- 7 /17SKATERAMP RT 72.40 113457 1101 07/30/03 2699 MOORPARK BICYCLE SHOP 9205 MPK PD BIKE SUPPLIES 184.58 113457 1101 07/30/03 2699 MOORPARK BICYCLE SHOP 9205 BICYCLE SAFETY HELMETS 102.63 TOTAL CHECK 287.21 113458 1101 07/30/03 1383 MOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMME 9240 03 AGREEMENT SRVCS 11000.00 113459 1101 07/30/03 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SUPPLY 9204 VECTOR LAY MASH 9,35 113460 1101 07/30/03 3641 NUCKOLLS, DAN 3866 REFUND -CAMP MPK 26.00 113461 1101 07/30/03 1853 ON DUTY UNIFORMS & EQUIPM 9118 MP PD VOLUNTEER UNIFO 4,388.67 1133462 1101 07/30/03 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9204 OPERATING SUPPLIES 26.34 113463 1101 07/30/03 2217 OVERLAND,PACIFIC &CUTLER, 9102 HIGH ST RELOCATION -FI 2,102.50 113463 1101 07/30/03 2217 OVERLAND,PACIFIC &CUTLER, 9103 5 /03PROPERTY MGT SRVC TOTAL CHECK 70.00 2,172.50 113464 1101 07/30/03 1793 PEDERSEN FENCE & PATIO CO 9103 TR PRK TENNIS CT FENC 1,496.80 113465 1101 07/30/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 20TH ANNIV FLYERS 18.64 113466 1101 07/30/03 2976 POTTER, DAN 9244 ADLT SFTBL FORFEIT FE; 20.00 113467 ` i 1101 07/30/03 3642 PULT'ORAK, STEPHEN 3301 REFUND -CIT #171710 50.00 113468 ( 1101 07/30/03 2579 QUINN LABEL PRINTING SYST 9232 PARKING PERMITS 113468 t 1101 07/30/03 2579 QUINN LABEL PRINTING SYST 9232 PLATE MOUNTING CHARGE 440.69 113468 °' 1101 07/30/03 2579 QUINN LABEL PRINTING SYST 9232 NUMBERED IN SEQUENCE, PER 22,79 106.37 TOTAL CHECK 569.85 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/30/03 PAGE NUMBER: 6 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:51 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113469 1101 07/30/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9241 EMP RECOGNITION SUPP 20.97 113469 1101 07/30/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 C COUNCIL SUPPLIES 33.71 TOTAL CHECK 54.68 113470 1101 07/30/03 3373 REINHARDT, CHRISTINE 3865 REFUND - WOMENS SOFTBAL 39.00 113471 1101 07/30/03 2564 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO 9211 TRACTOR TILLER RENTAL 135.14 113471 1101 07/30/03 2564 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIO 9252 TRACTOR TILLER RENTAL 135.14 TOTAL CHECK 270.28 113472 1101 07/30/03 1994 ROTARY CLUB OF MOORPARK 9221 6/03 CAPT DIAZ DUES 70.00 113473 1101 07/30/03 1656 SANTA BARBARA ZOO 9244 6/27/03 CAMP MPK TRIP 410.00 113474 110'. 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03COMM CTR PHONE 86.10 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03CAMPUS CYN PHONE 60.15 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6/03C MGR PHONE 20.37 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03GLENWOOD PRK PHON 60.15 1.3474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6 /03VECTOR PHONE 14.10 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03MILLER PRK PHONE 60.15 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03CAMPUS PRK PHONE 60.15 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6 /03FINANCE PHONE 20.37 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6 /03CITYWIDE PHONE 933.22 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6/03C CLERK PHONE 20.37 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9421 6 /03POINDEXTER PRK PH 60.15 113474 1101 07/30/03 1428 SBC 9420 6 /03EMRGNCY MGT PHONE 328.24 TOTAL CHECK 1,723.52 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03LANDS & LIGHT FUE 53.69 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03CEO FUEL 60.03 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03PW ADMIN FUEL 19.10 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03PW STREETS FUEL 34.11 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03AVRC FUEL 21.48 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03PARKS FUEL 273.52 113475 1101 07/30/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 6 /03VECTOR FUEL 45.93 TOTAL CHECK 507.86 113476 1101 07/30/03 :513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 OLD LA AVE & SPRING 425.01 113476 1101 07/30/03 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 6 /03INTERSECTION,INSU 1,405.65 TOTAL CHECK 1,830.66 1134 ")7 1101 07/30/03 1515 SIMI PACIFIC BLDG. MATERI 9252 AVCP WALL REPAIR 23.27 113478 1101 07/30/03 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9103 TR PRK RR METAL DOORS 1,484.00 113479 1101 07/30/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15POINDEXTER 301.01 113480 1101 07/30/03 3486 SUPER GRAPHIC SIGN COMPAN 9252 REPAIR AND REPLACE STEEPL 3,612.12 113480 1101 07/30/03 3486 SUPER GRAPHIC SIGN COMPAN 9252 REMOVE: OLD SIGNS AND INST 309.37 TOTAL CHECK 3,921.49 113481 ♦1101 i 07/30/03 3646 TAILLON, TRUDY 3862 REFUND - CONTRACT CLASS 90.00 113482 q �, )1101 07/30/03 1566 TRLCOM INC 9504 MOTOROLA M1225 RASE STATI 569.07 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:51 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113463 1:01 07/30/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 6 /03FACILITIES GAS 78.05 113483 1101 07/30/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 6 /03AVRC GAS 37.47 113483 1101 07/30/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 6 /03PW BLDG GAS 18.48 TOTAL CHECK 134.00 113484 1101 07/30/03 1581 TOMARK SPORTS 9252 1 BOLCO PITCHERS PLATE (1 727.37 113484 1101 07/30/03 1581 TOMARK SPORTS 9252 FREIGHT - SPORTS SUPPL 65.46 TOTAL, CHECK 792.83 113485 1101 07/30/03 1948 TOTAL TENNIS ACADEMY 9160 TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1,131.60 113486 1101 07/30/03 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9244 SPONSOR PLAQUES 329.47 113487 1101 07/30/03 1602 URBAN FUTURES, INC 9102 6 /03IMPLEMENTATION PL 2,282.50 113488 '101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 6/03C CLERK STORAGE 43.80 113488 1101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 5 /03COMM DEV STORAGE 33.90 113488 1101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 5 /03ADMIN STORAGE .90 113488 1101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 6 /03ADMIN STORAGE .90 113488 1101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 5/03C CLERK STORAGE 39.60 113486 1101 07/30/03 1152 VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL SE 9102 6 /03COMM DEV STORAGE 32.40 TOTAL CHECK 151.50 1;3489 1101 07/30/03 1156 VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN SERV 9102 2- 6 /03NUTRITION PROGR 4,808.77 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9254 6/03 VEHICLE CHARGES 9,723.90 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 3 -5/03 CADET ADJUSTME - 5,221.50 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHE:RIFF'S 9117 6 /03PATROL SRVCS 182,027.08 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03SPECIAL F.NF OFFIC 10,764.58 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03COMM SRVC 10,594.08 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03MSRO 9,627.6'7 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03DARE 5TH GRADE 9,627.67 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03HSRO OFFICER 9,627.67 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03INVESTIGATIVE SRV 32,035.33 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9118 6 /03OVERTIME REG,COUR 10,147.70 113490 i101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 6 /03TRAFFIC SRVCS 26,087.58 113490 1101 07/30/03 1616 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9244 6/6 AFTER DARK EVENT 293.46 TOTAL CHECK 305,335.22 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9236 6 /29SECRETARY AD 287.85 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY SPAR 2734 CINGULAR ADMIN FEE 13.40 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 INFRANEXT PUBLIC HEAR 314.78 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2734 INFRANEXT ADMIN FEE 47.22 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 WOTAWA- PUBLIC HEARING 87.01 :13491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 3806 WOTAWA -ADMIN FEE -13.06 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY SPAR 2733 GREENEWAY- PUBLIC HEAR 117,04 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2734 GREENEWAY -ADMIN FEE 17.56 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 3806 GREENEWAY -ADMIN REVEN -17.56 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2734 WOTAWA -ADMIN FEE 13.06 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 CINGULAR- PUBLIC HEARI 89.32 113491 1 1 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 3806 GREENEWAY ADMIN REVEN -16.66 113491 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 3806 CINGULAR -ADMIN REVENU -13.40 113491 �� 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 3806 INFRANEXT ADMIN REVEN -47.22 113491 j 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 9234 PUB NOTICE -296 CHARLE 90.34 113491 / 1 l/ 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2733 GREENEWAY- PUBLIC HEAR 111.03 113491 , 1101 07/30/03 1617 VENTURA COUNTY STAR 2734 GREENEWAY ADMIN FEE 16.66 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 8 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:51 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED ------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 1,097.37 113492 i101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/13- 7 /1000MM CTR 1,091.17 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10VILLA CAMPES 30.00 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /1OGLENWOOD PRK 2,140.78 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/13- 7 /10PW BLDG 149.43 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10VIRGINIA COL 821.49 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10PRKWYS & MED 535.66 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/13- 7 /10ZONE 3 82.57 1:3492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/13- 7 /10ZONE 9 144.97 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9252 5 /13- 7 /1.ORF:DEVELOPMEN 334.51 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10METROLINK 81.30 1:3492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10VECTOR 45.75 1 -3492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10MOBILEHOME 1,224.53 113492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /13- 7 /10POINDEXTER 3,413.96 1 13492 1101 07/30/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/13- 7 /10ZONE 7 1,938.02 TOTAL CHECK 12,034.14 113493 1101 07/30/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 6 /03GRAPHIC /BBS SRVC 672.00 113493 1101 07/30/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9504 VGA PORTS INSTALLED 910.95 113493 1101 07/30/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 6 /03VIDEO PROD SRVCS 2,250.00 TOTAL CHECK 3,832.95 113494 1101 07/30/03 2309 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 9330 CITYWIDE TREE TRIMMIN 1,110.54 113495 1101 07/30/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 TR PRK MAINT 7.59 113495 1101 07/30/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 WASP SPRAY -CNTRY TRAI 14.97 TCTAL CHECK 22.56 113496 1101 07/30/03 3647 WHITEHEAD, ANDREA 3862 REFUND -SMART ART CLAS 50.00 113497 1101 07/30/03 2843 WOLCO 9504 DP85F TOSHIBA FAX MACHINE 1,724.58 113497 1101 07/30/03 2843 WOLCO 9504 IMAGEVISION 2000 117.98 113497 1101 07/30/03 2843 WOLCO 9504 TOSHIBA E- STUIOD COPIER 2 2,966.54 TOTAL CHECK 4,809.1.0 113498 1101 07/30/03 1519 WORKPLACE, THE -SIMI VALLE 9222 MENDEZ -DMV TEST 35.00 113498 1101 07/30/03 1519 WORKPLACE, THE -SIMI VALLE 9236 3 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 155.00 113498 1101 07/30/03 1519 WORKPLACE, THE -SIMI VALLE 9236 15 EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 900.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,090.00 TOTAL FUND 481,305.54 TOTAL REPORT 481,305.54 \v i Ci PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:01:57 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 4,211.27 1000 GENERAL FUND 335,014.08 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 15.50 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 55,329.21 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 1,699.89 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 3,921.49 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 82.57 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 1,938.02 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 144.97 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 3,000.00 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 14,363.19 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 3,194.94 2605 GAS TAX 3,569.53 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 15,573.68 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 4,808.77 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 3,397.03 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 25,357.62 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 81.30 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 75.00 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 1,759.50 6399 TOLL BROS /BOLLINGF.R RESI 2,060.00 6514 SPRINT PCS /INFRANEXT 362.00 6515 USA PROPERTIES 96.60 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 558.90 6577 NEXTEL 102.72 6592 LEYDEN REAL ESTATE 225.40 6625 GREENEWAY DEVELOPMENT 262.29 6657 JOHN WOTAWA 100.07 TOTAL REPORT 481,305.54 4v i1 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: i CA-.'F: 08 /13/03 CITY OF M,OORPARK, CA V=NCHK21 TIME: 17:21:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE. ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - -- AMOi:NT 111582 ..01 08/13/03 3661 ALL STAR SPORTS 9244 ADLT. JBL SHIRT'S 1,349.87 113683 110: 08/13/03 3473 BERNARDS OFFICE FURNI°'UR c: 9103 1 FABRIC PANEL 840.84 113684 110: 08/13/03 2414 BRAN,-)CO BILLING 9254 TRUCK 415 OIL CHANGE 11.04 ;13685 1101 08/13/03 1114 CATHOLIC CHARITIES 9102 4- 5 /03CASE WCRKER SAI, 2,223.31 113685 i10'_ 08/13/03 1114 CATHOLIC CHARITIES 9102 10 /02- 3 /03CASE WORKER 5,419.69 TOTAL CHECK 7,643.00 1:3686 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES VOID: MULTI S-UB CHECK 113687 1:01 CS /13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.055- 6 /03WEST POINT 1,292.00 113687 :-01 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2'/11 91.053- 6 /03WEST POINT 3,543.75 113687 i101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.200- 5 /03RJR E.'NG 1,233.50 113687 1;01 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSCCIA'1'ES 2711 93.020- 5/031%'M -YON 1,146.00 113697 1101 08/i3/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.070- 5 /03RPD 03 02 542.50 =:3697 .'_O1 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCTATF.S 271.1 88.041- 6 /03SHEA HOMES :24.50 113687 :101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 6 /03CYPRESS 261.50 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 271i. 91.304- 6 /03USA PROP 77.00 :13697 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.500- 6 /03SHARMA 20.00 113687 110: 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9157 81.003 -6/03 ENCROACHM 1,267.70 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBO1"C ASSOCIATES 9650 92.031 -6/03 02 OVERLA 9,375.25 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9650 92.041 -6/03 02 SLURRY 5,723.25 1 -:3697 1101 06/1.3/0.3 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT. ASSOCIATES 2711 92.220- 6 /03NORTH PRK 53.50 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 93.090- 6 /03POLICE STA 993.50 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.020- 6 /03WM LYON 35.83 113687 1101 08/;3/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9601 83.420- 566/03LA AVE E 40.00 11368'7 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCTATF.S 2711 88.042- 5 /03SHEA HOMES 42.00 113667 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.020- 5 /03CYPRESS 439.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARI..FS ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.241- 5 /03MOREHEAD 20.00 :13687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ASHOTT ASSOCIATES 2711. 93.060- 6 /03MIRAGLIA 16.25 113697 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBCTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.070- 6 /03RPD 03 -02 486.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.150- 6 /03WIRELESS 20.00 113687 liCl 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.336- 5 /03LENNAR 10.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 90.070- 5 /03DEV PLNG 294.00 11368/ 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.071- 5 /03SHEA HOMES :13.00 113637 1'_01 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 271: 93.072- 5 /03SHF.A HOMES 466.25 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.073- 5 /03SHEA HOMES 93.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 94.242- 6 /03CNTRY CLUB 545.00 113697 ?101 08/13/03 :120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.246- 6 /03CNTRY CLUB 5,095.00 1-13687 1101 08/13/03 :120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 84.247- 6 /01CNTRY CLUB 6,109.09 113687 i101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.040- 6 /03TCG /CINGUL 20.00 11368'7 1101 O8/13/C3 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 96.345- 6 /03PAC COMM 20.00 1:3687 110: 08/13/C3 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.021 6 /03WM '.,YON 51.83 113687 i101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 86.370- 6 /03MORRISON 310.5.0 11368/ :]O1 08/i3/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 87.323- 6 /03LENNAR HOM 578.80 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.037- 6 /03SHEA HOMES 87.00 113667 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.239- 6 /03CABRILLO 1,562.40 11364'7 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBO'PC ASSOCIATES 2711 88.332 -6/03 CC&R 2,310.58 1-1.3687 t 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 88.334- 6 /03TRI CITY 2,418.19 :13687 110: 08/13/03 112', CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.027- 6 /03RICE DEV 87.00 :_3087 �✓ 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2'711 89.063 - 6/03.7 FELSENTH 67.00 113687 1 -101 08/13/03 1120 CliAR:,ES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.290 6 /03'1'R1L:AD 342.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 89.293- 6 /03TRIL:AD 20.00 113687 1101 08/13/03 1120 CHARLES AHHO'YT ASSOCIA .-ES 2711 90.025- 6 /03CYPRESS 875 00 �` C-4 PSNT'AMATICN - FUND ACCOUNT:NC PACE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 08/13/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENClIK21 T :ME:: 17:21:15 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FJND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED ' 1368'1 :10' 08/:3/03 1:3667 1-10. 08/1 13/03 113587 .10' 08/13/03 113687 ii0: 08/13/03 11387 i101 09/13/03 113687 1101 38/13/03 1:3687 1101 08/13/03 :13667 11-01 08/13/03 :13687 1:01 08/13/03 :1 1687 1101 09/13/03 _13687 1,101 08/13/03 :13687 1101 08/13/03 113687 1101 08/13/03 1:3681 1101 08/13/03 1_3687 1101 08/13/03 i13687 1101 08/13/03 113687 1'01 C8/i3/03 :13687 li0' 08/13/03 1:3687 11-01- 08/13/03 1:368 " / 1:01 06/13/03 113687 1' -01 08 /13/03 113627 1101 08/13/03 113687 1101 OB/13/03 li'1687 110: 08/13/03 113687 110' 08/13/03 CHARLES ABBOT; TOTAL CHECK 113688 1101 08/:3/03 113689 1101 08/13/03 113690 1101 08/:.3/03 11369: 1101 08/13/03 113692 1101 08/13/03 113692 1101 08/13/03 ASSOCIATES TOTAL CHECK 113693 1101 08/13/03 113694 1101 08/13/03 113695 1101- 08/1.3/03 113695 1i01 08/13/03 113695 ll3l 38/13/03 113695 110: 08/11/03 113695 1'-Oi 08/13/03 113695 110,1 8/13/03 '13695 s'a 1101 08/13/03 :13695 �' 11_01 08/13/03 '1369-3 i 1'01 08/13/03 2413 TOTAL CHECK 113696 /( a x'101 08/13/03 113696 1 1101 08/13/03 DRAIN CLEANING MACHIN 2324 JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ --- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT ------ DESCRTPTION ------- 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2'1:' 91.052- 6 /03WEST POINT 1120 C:;ARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.432- 6 /03KESLTY 1120 C!IARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.:11- 6 /03VOGEL 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIA'I'E:S 2711 91.384- 6 /03ADELPHIA 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 93.:70- 6 /C3IN -N-OUT 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIA'T'ES 271: 92.131- 6 /03ANAYA 1:20 CHARLES ABBC'1-T ASSOCIATES 2711 92.130- 6 /03ANAYA 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCTAT'ES 2711 92.431- 6 /03KESTLY BLD 1,120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.402- 6 /03CARD SRVCS :1-20 CHARLES ABBOT"I' ASSOCIATES 271", 93.'20- 6 /0311OLLAND /ED 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSCCIATES 2711 91.093- 6 /03COLMER 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.095- 6 /03COLMER DEV 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 9:.096- 6 /03COLMER DEV 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.191 6 /03SAM CASTRO 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 92.42:- 6 /03E':RE STATT 1120 CHARLES ABBOT; ASSOC:A'I'E:S 2711 92.422- 6 /03FIRA STATI 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOC:ATES 2711 92.423- 6 /03FRONTIER 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 1308 8/03 FINAL NOTE PYMT 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 6 /03ENG RETAIN 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.001- 6 /03E:NG RETAIN 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9153 81.00:- 6 /03ENG RETA :N 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.092- 6 /03COLMER DEV 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002- 6 /03T'RAFFIC EN 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 2711 91.091- 6 /03COLMER DEV 1120 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 9154 81.002 6 /03TRAFFIC EN _172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 PAPER SUPPLTF.S 1176 DEC:SION MANAGEMENT CO., 9102 OUESTYS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 2413 GAMETIME 9205 POINDE :X'T'ER PRK SLIDE 1252 GRAINGER INC 9208 DRAIN CLEANING MACHIN 2324 JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ 9224 MRA INSTITUTE MTLEAGE 2324 JULIE C.T. HERNANDEZ 9225 MRA INSTITUTE ?'TEALS 3660 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 9611 226HIG11 ST DEMOLITION 3662 KINSELLA, RYAN 9224 AIR POLLUTION DIST M'1' 1784 SBC /?!CI 9420 6 /03MRA /ECO LONG DIST 1784 SBC /MCI 9420 6/03C COUNCIL LONG Di 1784 SBC /MCI 9420 6/03C MGR IONG DISTAN 1784 SBC /MCI 9420 6 /03CH LONG DISTANCE 1784 SBC /MCI 9420 6 /03ST MAINT LONG DIS 1784 SBC /MCI 9420 6 /03AVRC LONG DISTANC 1794 SBC /MCI 9420 6 /03FTNANCE LONG DIST 1784 SBC /MCI 942C 6 /03COMM SRVC LONG DI 1'184 SBC /MCI 9420 6 /03SR CTR LONG DiSTA 1536 SOUTHERN CALTFORNIA ED:SO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15CAMPUS PRK 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15MOBILEHOME AMOUNT 20,241.55 20.00 665.0'0 6,729.50 5,124.22 60.00 2,'/68.2'- 2,915.75 67. CO 196.CC 2,721.30 110.50 439.00 71.83 719.83 903.50 20.00 11,836.63 2,:23.24 353.88 353.88 2,085.44 223.50 1,830.28 223.50 87,348.95 369.91 2,400.00 1,042.68 1,130.42 54.00 72.66 126.66 7,920.00 23.90 7.92 6.61 21.21 704.03 48.27 63.51 80.34 45.28 35.20 992.37 72.13 115.56 PENTAMATION - FUNC ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DA':E: 08/13/03 C1'IY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 17:21:1'1 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CAST! ACCT DATE ISSUED -- - - - - -- --- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMCUNT 113E96 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15GRIFFIN PRK 90.83 11 "s690 li0'_ 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15CAMPUS CYN 31.13 !13696 1101 C8/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED -SO 9413 6/13- 7 / :5PCH 'TILL PRK 707.60 113696 1 -01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15MTN MEADOWS 84.23 1' -3696 _ -01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15' ::ERRA REJAD 129.81 113696 i:01 09/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15GLENWOOD 34.91 :13696 - -01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- '1 /15V:RG7_NA COLO ::3696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFCRNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15AV PRK 2,879.51 3696 1101 08/13/03 1535 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 94'3 6 /13- 7 /15CNTRY TRAIL 13.39 _13696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15V1LLA CAMPFS 91.74 -:3696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 94:3 6 /13- 7 /15VECTOR ?16.88 1:3696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 943 6/13- 7 /15PCH HILL PRK 1,734.36 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15AV COM CTR 2,330.58 1:3695 1:01 08/13/C3 1536 SOU711ERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13 -7/15 798 MPK AVE 128.82 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15RF.DEVFI,CPMEN :6.10 1:3696 1 -01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6 /13- 7 /15CITY HALL 2,261.25 . -36 °.6 -01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ST MAINT 102.4'1 113696 1:01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 6 /13- 7 /15TRAFFIC SIGN 1,292.61 113696 -_01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 6 /13- 7 /15METROLINK LI 157.71 111696 :i01 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 6 /13- 7 /15CITYWIDE 22,700.05 -13696 110: 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 G /13- 7 /15PRKWYS & MEU 122.G2 11.3696 1101 08/13/03 153G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9414 6 /13- 7 /15SCY.00L PROPS 8.11 11369E 11Ci 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISC 9413 6 /13- 7 /1S'LONE 10 146.17 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CAL= FORNT..A FDISO 9413 G/13- 7 /15ZONE 1 19.62 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13 -7/15 ZONE 12 106.C5 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZCNE 2 45.64 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOU'.HPRN CALIFORNIA EDISO 94:3 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 4 14.42 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA F.DTSO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 5 15.01 1:3696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 6 13.39 li3696 1 -01 09/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED =SO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 7 39.32 113696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 8 50.78 :13696 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15COMM CTR 2,198.56 113696 1101 08/13/03 :536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISC 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONF. 9 2.0'/ 113E96 1101 08/13/03 1536 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 9413 6/13- 7 /15ZONE 11 13.82 TOTAL CHECK 37,899.00 - '_3697 1:01 08/13/03 1438 SUNGARD PEN ?AMATION INC 9102 6 /03DATA LINE SERVICE 38.52 113697 1101 OP. /13/03 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102 03/04 MAINTENANCE 1,051.05 TOTAL CHECK 1,089.57 11:36+98 1101 08/13/03 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 02/03 AUDIT SERVICES 7,450.00 1:3698 1101 08/13/03 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 02/03 AUDIT SERVICES 1,200.00 TOTAL CHECK 8,650.00 113699 1101 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 16.99 113699 1101 08/13/03 1159 VEN'I'URA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 8.50 1 -3699 1101 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 38.23 113699 '.:Ol 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPFATER ACCESS 59.4'/ 113699 :101 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MA11. #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 174.17 113699 1101 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 118.94 1:3699 \ J 11GI 08/13/03 1159 VENTURA COUNTY MAIL #1100 9251 6/03 REPEATER ACCESS 8.50 ( j 'TOTAL CHECK 424.80 C 1:3'700 j 1101 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5 /20- 7 /16MONTE VISTA 38.'17 113700 1101 08/13/03 ''620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 94:5 5 /20- 7 /16PFACH HILL 3,390.69 113700 ( 1101 08/13/03 162C VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 5/20- 7 /16ZONE 12 9,218.R2 �y PEN'I'AMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 08/13/03 CTTY OF MOORFARK, CA TIME: 17:21:15 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 GENERAL FUND C'IIF.CK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED - - -- - - - - - -- VENDOR ------- - - - - - -- ACCT 113700 1101 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 _:3700 1101 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 i'- -3700 1.01 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 113700 liol 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 113700 -101 08/13/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 94,5 TOTAL CHECK 113 3701 '- 101 08/13/03 3284 WWCOT 9601 TOTAL FUND TOTAL, REPORT W t i ti - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION 5 /20- 7 /16MILLER PARK 5 /20- 7 /16PRKWYS & MFD 5/20- 7 /16ZONE 6 5/20-7/16ZONE 5 5/20- 7 /16ZONE 2 6 /03PD ARCHITECTURAL. PAGE NUMBER: 4 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 AMOUNT 5,115.20 2,186.17 35.02 803.16 1,931.82 22,719.65 23,26'/.99 205,270.65 205,27C.E5 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 08 /13/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIM'e: :/:2 ::45 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TCTALS FUND FUND T1'1'i.F. AMOUNT O1C0 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 4,433.26 1CCO 3ENERAL FUND 20,290.26 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 76.4G 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4,006.55 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 25,016.95 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 19.62 2302 AD 84 -2 ZCNE 2 1,977.46 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 14.42 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 818.17 2306 AD 84 -2 ZCNE 6 48.41 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 39.32 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 50.78 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 2.07 23-0 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 146.17 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE li 13.82 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 9,324.87 2400 PARK !MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 13,908.54 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 40.00 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. 11,836.63 2603 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 8A 15,098.50 2605 GAS TAX 1,816.83 210' CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 7,643.00 290. MRA LOW /MOD INC HCiiSE /INC 115.56 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 9,270.68 40C2 FOLICE FACILITIES FUND 24,261.49 500C LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 166.21 6044 COLMER, WAYNE 7,:86.52 6078 WESTPOINT HOMES 25,077.30 6148 PACIFIC COMMUNITIES 20.00 6291 FAR WEST /KAUFMAN BROAD 1,954.25 6302 FELSENTHAL, 7F.RROI,D S. 67.00 6350 CABRILLO EDC 5161 1,562.40 6385 RICHMOND AM H x18.80 6399 'CCLL BROS /BOLI.INGER RES: :1,749.09 6407 WT-STERN PACIFIC HOUSING 10.00 6428 TRILIAD /LA AVE :.LC 362.00 6431 CARDSERVICE 67.00 6437 CYPRESS LAND COMPANY 1,575.50 6460 PERFORMANC= NURSERY /SCE 294.00 6480 M &Y, DEVELOPMENT 20.00 65:3 ZELLMAN /TARGET CENTER 5,124.22 6515 USA PROPERTIES 77.00 6534 NORTH PARK VILLAGE 53.50 6541 SHARMA GENERAL 20.00 6548 PARDEE C0NSTRUCTI0N 310.50 6566 RJR ENGINEERING 1,233.50 6592 LEYDEN REAL ESTATE 4,728.77 6634 KE.STLY BU:LDING COMPANY 3,022.75 6638 W1L -IAM LYON HOMES, INC. 1,233.66 6650 RAMON R. SALAZAR 20.00 6653 L &D MIRAGLIA FAMILY 16.25 6658 DESIGNARC 166.00 6659 WIRELESS FACTLITIES, :NC 2C.00 ° 6900 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPT. 1,643.33 s 6908 ADE:LPHIA 6,729.50 G919 ,?AIME ANAYA 2,826.21 6923 SAMUEL CASTRO 71.83 6926 JOSEPH VOGEL 665.00 '1 PAGE. NUMBER: VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 PENTAMA'f;ON - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 08/13/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VF.NCHK21 T -ME: 17:21:45 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT TOTAL REPORT 2G5,270.65 { 1 t ITEM-- CITY OF MOORPARK WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE-72003-2004 FISCAL YEAR At .f -V ClTY COUWCIL MEETI,N,G OF AUGUST 21�J1,003 SEQUENCE AMOUNT From 1'0 MANUAL 1132.59 - 113263 & S 211,795.13 WARRANTS 113265 & 113404 - 113405 & 113582/ VOIDED 113192 & 113063 & $ (1,923.42) WARRANT 113383 & 113438 PAYROLL LIABILITY 113396 - 113400 & $ 2,600.16 WARRANTS 113577 - 113581 & $ 2,595.84 113590 - 113594 $ 2,570.53 j REGULAR WARRANTS TOTAL. 113380 - 113395 & $ 18,800.22 113499 - 113576 & $ 166,416.23 113595 - 113681 $ 1,677,221.01 $ 2,080,075.70 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 01CO - INTERNAL Si BUDGET UNI" ACCOUNT CONTROL OIOC 3751 M070103 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY iRVICES FUND VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 14 07/01/03 1101 7 /03COBRA VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 07/01/03 8.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 010057000000 9233 CALIFORNIA JOINT POW N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 03 /04ENV1RONMENTAL L 20 03 /04DEPOSIT 07/01/03 113259 0.00 0.00 010057000000 9233 CALIFORNIA JOINT POW N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 03 /04GENERAL LIABILI 20 03 /04DEPOSIT 07/01/03 113259 0.00 0.00 010057000000 9011 CALIFORNIA JOINT POW N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 03 /04WORKERS COMPENS 20 03 /04DEPOSIT 0. 1/01/03 113259 0.00 0.00 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL CENTRAL SERVICES NET PAYABLE TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICES FUND NET PAYABLE RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING U 8.00 8.00 4800.00 4800.00 81223.00 81223.00 72082.00 72082.00 158105.00 158105.00 158105.00 158105.00 158113.00 158113.00 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE. 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 100C - GENERAL FUND BUDGE-': UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 1000 2209 PUBLIC F,MPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 156.00 M070103 7 /03EMP SHARE MEDICA 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 156.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 156.00 156.00 100021000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 60.60 M070103 7/03C MGR VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 60.60 100021000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 0'1/01/03 18.07 M070103 7/03C MGR EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 18.07 100021000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3639.53 M070103 7/03C MGR MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 3639.53 100021000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 520.55 M070103 7/03C MGR DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 0. 7/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 520.55 10OG21000000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 220.02 M070103 7/03C MGR LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 220.02 TOTAL CITY MANAGER CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY MANAGER NET PAYABLE 4458.77 4458.77 100031000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 65.30 M070103 -7/03C CLERK VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 11.3262 0.00 0.00 65.30 100031000000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 14.45 M070103 7/03C CLERK EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 14.45 100331000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01./03 2244.60 M070103 7/03C CLERK MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 2244.60 100031000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 553.21 M070103 7/03C CLERK DNTL,LIF 20 JULY 03 C7/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 553.21 100031000000 9010 METLIEE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 122.00 M070103 7/03C CLERK LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 122.00 TOTAL CITY CLERK CHECK AMT TOTAL CITY CLERK NET PAYABLE 2999.56 2999.56 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100C31100000 9010 CPTC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 8.00 M0701C3 7 /03HR VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 8.00 :000.31100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3.61 M070103 7 /03HR EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 3.61 10OC31100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RF.TI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 964.03 M070103 7 /03HR MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 964.03 100031100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 45.73 M070103 7 /03HR DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 45.73 100031100000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 26.83 M070103 7 /03HR LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 26.83 TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHECK AMT TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES NET PAYABLE 1048.20 1048.20 100051000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 -3.30 M070103 7 /03ADMIN VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 -3.30 :00051000000 90:G HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 9.03 M070103 7 /03ADMIN EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 9.03 00051000000 901C PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 2078.66 M070103 7 /03ADMIN MEDICAL, 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 2078.66 100051000000 901C FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N C7/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 257.94 M070103 7 /02ADMTN DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 257.94 100051000000 9010 METT,TFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 94.93 M0701.03 7 /03ADMIN LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 94.93 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES NET PAYABLE 2437.26 2437.26 100051001004 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 20.70 M070103 7 /03ADMIN VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 20.70 18Q051001004 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3.61 � O i �i RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:51 l� PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MANUAL MOORPARK, CA CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 4 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 T/C PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC A-MT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE M010103 7 /03ADMIN EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 3.61 100051001004 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET1 7 /03ADMIN MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 675.30 675.30 100051001004 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03ADMIN DNTL,I.IFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 115.52 115.52 100051001004 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7/03IS MGR LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 36.08 36.08 TOTAL IS MANAGER (8001 CHECK AMT TOTAL IS MANAGER (800) NET PAYABLE 8S1.21 851.21 100051100000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03FINANCE VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 57.81 57.81 100051100000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03FINANCE EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 16.25 16.25 100051100000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03FINANCE MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3374.75 3374.75 100051100000 5010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03FINANCE DNTL,LIF N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 342.91 342.91 100051100000 9010 MO70103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03FINANCE LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 159.43 159.43 100051100000 9225 M072303 JOHNNY M EA PENTAMATION SEMINAR N 20 EXP REP 7/26 07/23/03 07/23/03 1101 113404 0.00 0.00 07/23/03 0.00 32.00 32.00 :00051100000 9224 M072303 JOHNNY M EA PENTAMATION SEMINAR !4 20 E•XP REP 7/26 07/23/03 07/23/03 1101 113404 0.00 0.00 07/23/03 0.00 60.48 60.48 TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NE'f PAYABLE 92.48 92.48 100051100000 9225 M072303 SHERATON ONTARIO AIR 7/23PEI SEMINAR LODG N 20 JOHNNY EA 07/23/03 07/23/03 1101 113405 0.00 0.00 07/23/03 0.00 99.46 99.46 TOM FINANCE CHECK AMT 4143.09 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:51 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING C� 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 7099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 100061000000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M070103 7 /03COMM DEV VISION 20 JULY 03 100061000000 9010 HOLMAN CROUP, THE N M070103 7 /03COMM DEV EAP 20 JULY 03 100061000000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N .40'70103 7 /03COMM DEV MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 100061000000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N MO70103 7 /03COMM DEV -)N'rL,LI 20 JULY 03 100061C00000 9010 MF.TLIFE SMALL BUSINE N M070103 7 /03CEOKM DEV LTD,ST 20 JULY 03 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOP ADMIN CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOP ADMIN NET PAYABLE 100064300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M070103 7 /03CEO VISION 20 JULY 03 :00064300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M070103 7 /03CEO EAP 20 JULY 03 100064300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N .4070103 7 /03CRO MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 100064300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N M070103 7 /03CEO DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 100064300000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N M070103 7 /03CEO LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 100064400000 9010 CPTC LIFE INSURANCE N M070103 7 /03PLANNING VISION 20 JULY 03 \i c� % RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:52 ki 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 07/G1/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE 5 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 4143.09 23.88 23.88 4.33 4.33 878.65 878.65 186.96 186.96 62.35 62.35 1156.17 1156.17 20.67 20.67 4.69 4.69 696.24 696.24 124.26 124.26 38.42 38.42 884.28 884.28 7.95 7.95 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING FERICD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 6 FUND - :000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 PURCHASE T/C INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE - 0006440000C 9010 M070103 HOI.MAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PLANNING EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1.81 1.81 100064400000 5010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03PLANNING MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 26'7,78 267.78 100064400000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03PLANNING DNTL,LI N 20 JULY 03 0'//01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 65.40 65.40 100064400000 9010 M0701C3 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03PLANNING LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 12.16 12.16 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT TOTAi, PLANNING NET PAYABLE 355.10 355.10 '_0007i000U00 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03COMM SRVCS VISIO N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 7.20 7.20 100071000000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03COMM SRV EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.25 3.25 100071000000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03COMM SRVCS MEDIC N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 367.60 367.60 100071000000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03COMM SRVC DNTL, N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 55.33 55.33 100071000000 9010 M07010.3 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03COMM SRVC LTD,ST N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 38.99 38.99 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES NET PAYABLE 472.37 472.37 1C0072100000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03VECTOR VISION N 20 JULY C3 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 41.40 41.40 1000'12100000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03VECTOR EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 7.22 7.22 1000x072100000 J S� 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03VECTOR MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1543.08 1543.08 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:52 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING c. r 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND P,UDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 7 1099 PURCIIASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AN.T T/C INVOICE. C14K DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100072100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N "070103 / /03VECTOR DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 100072100000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N M070103 7 /03VECTOR LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL CHECK AMT TOTAL VECTOR CONTROL NET PAYABLE 100076100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M070103 7 /03SR CTR VISION 20 JULY 03 100076100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N MO'70103 7 /03SR CTR EAP 20 JULY 03 100076100000 90i0 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N M070103 ' / /03SR CTR MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 100076100000 90:0 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N M070103 7 /03SR CTR DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 100076100000 9010 M.ETLIFE SMALL BUSINE N M070103 7 /03SR CTR LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 TOTAL SENIOR CENTER CHECK AMT TOTAL SENIOR CENTER NET PAYABLE. 100076200000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N M070103 7 /03CONLM FAC VISION 20 JULY 03 100076200000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N M07C103 7 /03COM FAC EAP 20 JULY 03 100076200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N M070103 7 /03COKM FAC MEDTCAL 20 JULY 03 100076200000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N M070103 7 /03COM FAC DNTL,LIF 20 JULY 03 Cj C: j RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:53 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 1101 113265 1101 113262 1101 113261 1101 113263 1101 113260 1101 113265 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 261.60 261.60 58.67 58.67 1911.97 1911.97 15.90 15.90 3.61 3.61 593.18 593.18 130.80 130.80 34.26 34.26 777.75 777.75 31.05 31.05 5.42 5.42 '_098.82 '_098.82 196.21 196.21 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1 /G3 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100076200000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 39.67 M07G103 7 /03COMM FAC LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 39.67 TOTAL COM_MUNITY FACILITIES CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY FACI:.ITIaS NET PAYABLE 1371.17 1371.17 100076300000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 0. 1/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 42.70 M07C103 7 /03REC VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 42.70 100076300000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 10.84 M070103 7 /03REC EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 10.84 100076300000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 1764.81 M070103 7 /03REC MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 1764.81 100076300000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 233.28 M070103 7 /03AVRC DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 233.28 100076300000 9010 ME:TLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 i10.89 M070103 7 /03REC LTD,S'ID 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 110.89 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 2162.52 2162.52 100076301007 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 8.00 M070103 7 /03TEEN COORD VISIO 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 8.00 100076301007 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3.61 M070103 7 /03TEEN COOR EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 3.61 100076301007 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 267.78 M070103 7 /03TEEN COOR MEDICA 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 267.78 100076301007 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 45.'13 M070103 7 /03TEEN COOR DNTL,L 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 45.73 100076301007 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 22.04 M070103 7 /03TEEN COOR LTD,ST 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 22.04 TOTAL TEEN PROGRAMS (800) CHECK AMT TO'P*L I'EEN PROGRAMS (800) NET PAYABLE 347.16 \ J 347.16 i} Ci / RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:53 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING e 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 9 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 T/C PURCHASE INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 100081-000000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03PW VISION N 20 JULY 03 0'7101103 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 13.18 13.18 10008:000000 9010 M07C103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PW EAR N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 2.65 2.65 100081000000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03PW MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 546.30 546.30 1C0081000000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03PW DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 89.56 89.56 1.00OB1000C00 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL, BUSINE 7 /03PW LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 22.74 22.74 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS CHECK NTT T'O'TAL PUBLIC WORKS NET PAYABLE 674.43 674.43 100083200000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03NPDES VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.56 0.56 100083200000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03NPDES EAR N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.14 0.14 100083200000 9010 M0701C3 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET_ 7 /03NPDES MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 23.73 23.73 100083200000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03NPDES DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.72 3.72 100083200000 9010 M070103 ME:TLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03NPDES LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1.52 1.52 TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT TOTAL, NPDES NET PAYABLE 29.67 29.67 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 26236.68 26236.68 4 :> Ci 1 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:54 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING L.i 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 1U FUND - 2000 - TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 PURCHASE T/C INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PkOGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACC: CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 200082100000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7/03X -GUARD VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 9.75 9.75 200082100000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7/03X -GUARD EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 2.85 2.85 200082100000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7/03X -GUARD MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 350.49 350.49 200082100000 9010 M07C103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7/03X -GUARD DNTL,LIF N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 59.29 59.29 200082100000 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7/03X -GUARD LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 12.83 12.83 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS CHECK AMT TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS NET PAYABLE 435.21 435.21 200083300000 9010 M070103 CP1C LIFE INSURANCE '7 /03PRKNG ENF VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 15.24 15.24 200083300000 90;0 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PRKN ENF EAP N 2C JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.61 3.61 200083300000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RF.'CI 7 /03PRKNG ENF MEDICA N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 652.44 652.44 200083300000 9010 M070103 FORTTS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03PRKNG ENF DNTL,L N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 107.15 107.15 200083300000 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03PRKNG ENF LTD,ST N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 26.52 26.52 TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 804.96 804.96 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND NET PAYABLE 1240.17 1240.17 � J 6 RUN DATE 07/28/03 V TIME 16:42:54 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 11 FUND - 22CO - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 PURCHASE T/C INVOICE ORJE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 220061000000 901C M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03COKM DEV VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 O.CO 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 13.93 13.93 220061000000 9010 ?1070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE V /03COMM DEV EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.61 3.61 220061000000 9010 M070103 PURI.IC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03COKM DEV MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 839.30 839.30 220061000000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03COMM DEV DNTL,I.I N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 108.28 108.28 220061000000 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL RUSINE 7 /03COMM DEV LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 34.09 34.09 TOTAL COMMUNITY TOTAL CON_MUNITY DEVELOP ADMIN CHECK A.MT DEVELOP ADMIN NET PAYABLE 999.21 999.21 220064300000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03CEO VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.40 0.40 220064300000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03CEO EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.17 0.17 220064300000 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03CEO MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 14.83 14.83 220064300000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03CEO DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 4.65 4.65 220064300000 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE 7 /03CEO LTD,S'1'D N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1.13 1.13 TOTAL CODE ENFCRCEMENT CHECK A.MT TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT NET PAYABLE 21.18 21.18 220064400000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03PI.ANNING VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 74.98 74.98 224400000 ` 9010 MO.70103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PLANNING EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 17.88 17.88 �i 1 RUN DATE. 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:55 V PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 2200 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MCORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 12 1099 PURCHASE ORDF. TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 220064400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N M070103 7 /03PLANNING MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 220064400000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N M070103 7 /03PLANNING DNTL,LI 20 JULY 03 220064400000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N M070103 7 /03PLANNING LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 TOTAL PLANNING CHECK AMT TOTAL PLANNING NET PAYABLE TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE N i RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:55 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 2608.57 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 2608.57 0'1/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 545.95 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 545.95 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 223.92 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 223.92 3471.30 3471.30 4491.69 4491.69 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE BUDGE:' UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION TIC INVOICE ClIK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 230079007901 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07 /01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 2300790079C1 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 230079007901 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 23007900/901 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 230079007901 90i0 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE 0 0, 1 RUN DATF 01/28/03 TIME 16:42:55 j PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE 13 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 7.25 7.25 1.24 1.24 207.27 207.27 45.78 45.78 12.43 12.43 273.97 273.97 273.97 273.97 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERTOD: 1/0.3 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 14 F!,ND - 2302 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 RUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 T/C PURCHASE INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 230283208902 9010 M070103 CPIC 1,IFE INSURANCE 7/03AD842 VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.10 0.10 230283208902 9010 N.070103 HOLMAN CROUP, THE 7/03AD842 EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.02 0.02 230283208902 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE. RETI 7/03AD842 MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.48 3,48 230283208902 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.65 0.65 230283208902 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSTNE 7/03AD842 LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1.101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 0.12 0.12 TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE 4.37 4.3'7 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 NET PAYABLE 4.37 4.37 y C i RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:56 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/C3 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 15 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND 2305 - AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1.099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CAST{ ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 2305832C8902 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.10 M070103 7/03AD842 VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 0.10 2305832C8902 9010 HOT,MAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.02 M070103 7/03AD842 EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 0.02 230583208902 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 3.48 3.48 230583208902 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.65 M070103 7/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 0.65 230583208902 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.12 M070103 7/03AD842 LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 0.12 TOTAL NPDES CHECK AMT TOTAL NPDES NET PAYABLE 9 37 4.37 TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 NET PAYABLE 4.37 4.37 \/q 1 �j RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:56 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2310 - AD 84 -2 'LONE 10 5UDGET UNIT ACCO';NT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 231089008902 9010 CPIC LIFE. INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M.070103 7/03AD842 VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 231089008902 9010 HOL.MAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 231089008902 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RF.TI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 231089008902 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 231089008902 9010 METL,IFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 MC70103 7/03AD842 LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 TOTAL. AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 NET PAYABLE TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 CHECK AMT TOTAL AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 NET PAYABLE j C i 3 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:56 �i PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE 16 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE. 1.24 1.24 0.22 0.22 41.77 41.77 7.95 7.85 1.46 1.46 52.54 52.54 52.54 52.54 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 17 FUND - 2400 - PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT CONTROL VENDOR DESCRIPTION 1099 PURCHASE. T/C INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 240078000000 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03PARKS VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 48.50 48.50 240078000000 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PRKS EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 9.58 9.58 240078000000 5010 M010103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03PARKS MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1673.01 3673.01 240078000000 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03PRKS DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 311.96 311.96 240078000000 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINF. 7 /03PARKS LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 83.02 83.02 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANC- CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 2126.07 2126.07 240078001001 9010 M070103 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE 7 /03PARKS VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 20.70 20.70 240078001001 9010 M070103 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 7 /03PRKS EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 3.61 3.61 240078001001 9010 M070103 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI 7 /03PARKS MEDICAL N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 696.25 696.25 240078001001 9010 M070103 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU 7 /03PRKS DNTL,LIFE N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 130.80 130.80 24007800100'_ 9010 M070103 METLIFE SMALL BUSINF. 7 /03PARKS LTD,STD N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 18.08 18.08 TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) CHECK AMT TOTAL MAINTENANCE WORKER (800) NET PAYABLE 869.44 869.44 TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CHECK AMT TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NET PAYABLE 2995.51 2995.51 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:57 C� PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 18 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2605 - GAS TAX 3UDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE: ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 260583103000 9010 CPTC LIFE INSURANCE N 07 /01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 66.72 M070103 7 /03ST MAINT VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 66.72 260583100000 9010 HOI,MAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 19.13 M070103 7 /03ST MAINT EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 19.13 260583100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3121.04 M070103 7 /03ST MAINT MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 3121.04 260583100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07 /01/03 459.03 M070103 7 /03ST MAINT DNTL,LI 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 459.03 260583100000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 174.50 M070103 7 /03ST MAINT LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 174.50 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE CHECK AMT 3840.42 'TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE NET PAYABLE 3840.42 26C589008902 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 1.19 M070103 7/03 AD842 VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 1.19 260589008902 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.24 M0701.03 7/03AD842 EAP 20 JULY 03 07 /01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 0.24 26C589008902 9310 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.03 07/01/03 82.37 M070103 7/03AD842 MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 82.37 260589008902 9010 FORTIS BFNEF'ITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 9.74 M070103 7/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 9.74 260589008902 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 3.66 M070103 7/03AD842 LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 3.66 TOTAL PARKWAYS &MEDIANS CITYWIDE CHECK AMT 97,20 TOTAL PARKWAYS &MEDIANS CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE 97.20 TOTAL GAS TAX CHECK AMT 3937,62 TOTAL GAS TAX NET PAYABLE 3937.62 \ av J 1:3 RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:57 1 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 19 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2701 CCBG ENTITLEMENT FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL. DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 270124400060 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 1.60 .070103 7 /03CDBG VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 1.60 270124400000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/0)./03 1103 . 0.00 07/01/03 0.72 .070103 7 /03CDBG EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 0.72 270124400000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RET1 N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 53.56 M070103 7 /03CDBG MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 53.56 270124400000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 9.15 M070103 7 /03CDBG DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 9.15 270124400000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 8.36 MO'70103 7 /03CDBG LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 8.36 'TOTAL CDBG CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG NET PAYABLE 73.39 73.39 270176107620 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINF. N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 7.44 M070103 7 /03CDBG SR LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 7.44 TOTAL CDBG SENIOR EXPENSES CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG SENIOR EXPENSES NET PAYADLE 7.44 7.44 TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND NET PAYABLE 80.83 80.83 \v 1 .. r ,� RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:58 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 20 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1 /C3 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACC? SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 290124200000 90i0 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 13.40 M070103 7 /03MRA VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 13.40 290124200000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 4.69 M070103 7 /03MRA EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 4.69 290124200000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 510.82 M070103 7 /03MRA MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 510.82 290124200000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 82.34 M070103 7 /03MRA DNTL,LIFE 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 82.34 290124200000 9030 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 41.47 M070103 7 /03MRA LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 41.47 TOTAL MRA HOUSING CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA HOUSING NET PAYABLE 652.72 652.72 TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE 652.72 652.72 �a i f � RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:58 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 FORTIS BENEFITS 1NSU N 07/01/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA 07101103 176.56 M07C103 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 07/01/03 113260 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 176.56 290224100000 9010 FUND - 2902 - MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 1101 0.00 07/01/03 45.92 M070103 7 /03MRA /ECO LTD,STD BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT 290224100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M.070103 7 /03MRA /ECO VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 290224100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 MO.70103 7 /03MRA /ECO EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 290224100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RF,TI N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 M070103 7 /03MRA /ECO MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 PAGE 21 CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 27.70 27.70 5.42 5.42 845.70 845.70 290224100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS 1NSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07101103 176.56 M07C103 7 /03MRA /ECO DNTL,LIF 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 176.56 290224100000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 45.92 M070103 7 /03MRA /ECO LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 45.92 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHECK AMT 1101.30 TOTAL MRA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NET PAYABLE 1101.30 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER CHECK AMT 1101.30 TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER NET PAYABLE 1101.30 1; 3 pr \ RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME. 16:42:58 V PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 22 FUND - 5000 - LOCAL T.RANST'C PROGRAMS 8C BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION 1099 T/C PURCHASE INVOICE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CHK DATE ACCOUNT CASH ACCT CHECK NO SALES TAX USE TAX DISC DATE DISC AMT CHECK AMT NET PAYABLE 500073100000 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE M070103 7 /03PUB TRANS VISION N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113262 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 4.40 4.40 500073100000 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE M070103 7 /03PUS TRANS EAP N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113261 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 1.99 1.99 500073100000 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI M070103 7 /03PUB TRANS MEDICA N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113263 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 204.91 204.91 500073100000 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU M070103 7 /03PUB TRANS DNTL,L N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113260 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 25.30 25.30 500073100000 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE M070103 7 /03PUB TRANS LTD,ST N 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 07/01/03 1101 113265 0.00 0.00 07/01/03 0.00 19.61 19.61 TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS CHECK AMT TOTAL PUBLIC TRANSIT PROGRAMS NET PAYABLE 256.21 256.21 TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C CHECK AMT TOTAL LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C NET PAYABLE 256.21 256.21 RE i f� f RUN DATE 07/28/03 TIME 16:42:59 T � PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 07/28/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 23 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 5001 - SOLID WASTE AB939 BJDGET JNI':' ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE CRDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SA1,FS TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NF.T PAYABLE 50017530750: 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.80 M070103 7 /03SLD WST VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 0.80 500175307501 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 0.36 M0701C3 7 /03SLD WST EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.00 0.00 0.36 5001753075C! 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07/01/03 1.101 0.00 07/01/03 54.91 M070103 7 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 54.91 500175307501 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 4.57 M070103 7 /03SLD WST DNTL,LIF 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 4.57 500175307501 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE: N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/Oi/03 4.41 M070103 7 /03SLD WST LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 4.41 TOTAL USED OIL GRANT C14ECK AMT 65.05 TOTAL USED OIL GRANNT NET PAYABLE 65.05 500175307502 9010 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 15.60 M070103 7 /03SLD WST VISION 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113262 0.00 0.00 15.60 5C0175107502 9010 HOLMAN GROUP, THE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 7.05 M070103 7 /03SLD WST EAP 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113261 0.0C 0.00 7.05 500175307502 9010 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETI N 07 /01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 534.34 M070103 7 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113263 0.00 0.00 534.34 500175307502 9010 FORTIS BENEFITS INSU N 0'7/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 52.74 M070103 7 /03SLD WST DNTL,LIF 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113260 0.00 0.00 52.74 500175307502 9010 METLIFE SMALL BUSINE N 07/01/03 1101 0.00 07/01/03 45.99 M070103 7 /03SLD WST LTD,STD 20 JULY 03 07/01/03 113265 0.00 0.00 45.99 TOTAL A9939 CHECK AMT 655.72 TOTAL A8939 NET PAYABLE 655.72 TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 CHECK AMT '720.77 TOTAL SOLID WASTE AB939 NET PAYABLE 720.77 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT 200161.75 TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE 200161.75 c; RUN DATE 07/28/03 1: 'TIME 16:42:59 PENTA.MATION - FUND ACCOUNTING �a i� C1':Y 07 MCCRPARK, CA A:- CCUNTI \, P=RiOD: 2/03 MAN"-*AL CHECK AC :VITY n AGF.. - FJND - 29C1 - M3A LCW /YOD INC HOUSE /INC 3UCGET UNIT ACCCJNT VF.NDCR 1099 PJRCIASE (R:)F -RA- \SALT P20GRAM CASH ACC': SALES ':AX D =SC CAT: CHECK \NT CONTR,^,'. DES::R :F:ION ': /C INVOTCF CIIK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO ':SF TAX DISC AMT NET •AYA9:,E 2901242C2CO1 5285 REALTY EXECUTIVFS F C8/01/03 11C' O.00 08/--1/03 11633.38 MC, 2C:03 DEAN .KF.'. DO'WN ?AYMFN 20 SPACE U24 08 /f,: /03 1:3582 0. GO 0.or, 11u33.38 '1'0fAL MRP3 MOBILE FM FA3K REL0C CHECK AMT ,CTA:, '4RPK '4On1:,F. H. "I PARK R=-OC NET PAYABTF "OTA_, MRA LOW /MOD _NC IIO:;SE /TNC CHECK A.MT TOTA!, MtiA -OW/MOD INC - CJS - / =NC NET PAYABLE 70TAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NF, PAYAB:,3 �q � v kUlJ DATF. 08/3/03 -.'IMF 11:44:51 ?=N"AMA._ON - FUND ACCOUN7-NG- 11633.32 '- :63i.38 11533.38 116333.38 11633.33 11633.32 C7/29/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1C00 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR CONTROL DESCRIPTION 1000 5500 LAMPPOST PIZZA AP062503 ,;BL PIZZA PARTY TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT TOTAL GENERA?, FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL GENERAT, FUND CHECK ANT TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT -OTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE ! a O.' 'L RUN DATE 07/29/03 T',MF. 10:16:06 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY PAGE 1 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE N 07/14/03 1101 0.00 06/09/03 - 520.00 20 26TEAMS 06/25/03 113192 V 0.00 0.00 - 520.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING - 520.00 - 520.00 - 520.00 - 520.00 - 520.00 - 520.00 C9 /13/C3 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 1 ACCOUN ;INC °F.PTCD: 1/33 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUNC 2301 - KRA LCW /MCD INC HOUSE /ISC 3UDGE, UN =T ACCC:;NT VFNDOR 1055 PURCHASF. ORDE TRANSACT ?RC3:cA,M CAST ACCT SALES TAX DTSC DATE C FCK AMT CCN,ROL C- SC'kl ?:' =CK T/C INVOIC- CHX L'ATF ACCCJNT Cll -CX NO USE TAX DISC AM, :4 7—T PAYAB -L 29C -= X500 :,Hl"',T ?S, DON N 07/24/03 1:J1 0.00 06/C4/03 - 218.42 AP061103 RENT.U1'1L-'1 "f CVFKPAY 20 UTIL_7I3S 06/11/03 113,-63 V O.CO .;.00 - 218.42 I O'1 'AT, MRA '_OWIXOD =NC '.iCUSE /INC CHECK AM': - 2:8.42 TOTAL M7A LC4i /KO-; TNC ?CUSE /I .NC NET PAYADL3 218.42 TOTAL MRA i,Ch /N'OD INC - CJSF. / =NC CHECK AMT - 218.42 TCTAL :v:::P. LGW /MUD INC EO::SF. / -NC N -: PAYABLE - 218'42 'O"AL REPORT CHECK AMT - 218.42 'TO.'AL REEPOZT NT— PAYA3L£ - 218.112 C i DA'.-L' C8 /:3/ J3 TTY— 14:34:17 PEN7kvA—:CN - FUND ACCOUNTING :8/ ' .3/03 DISC DATE CII3_< A?!T CTTY CF MCORPARK, CA NET ?AYA3L3 ACCOUNTING F =3IOD: 2/03 C6/30/03 - 525.00 MANUAL C:13CK ACTIVITY 0.50 F,:KD 'C -00 OEN -77AL, FUND O.CO 06/30/03 200.00 0.00 RUUCF.T UN -7 ACCOUNT VF.NDCR 1099 PURCEASL ORD3 - 2\NSA= PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL OFSCRIP.ICN T/C :NVOICF CHK DATE ACCOUNT C: -!F.CX NO _: ^J7 --Qu0J6a 9221 CA"RCRM N 08/13/03 '101 070903 ?RKS 6 R3C COMM DUES 2,;: 1668 07/09/03 il3383 V IOCC:71i:000C•C 9220 CAPRCBv N 08/13/03 110' C7;;5C3 ^3/04 CPRS SCR.S(-R :F 'F 20 1668 07/09/03 1.13383 V TOTA'. VENDOR CHICK A.MT TJ'IAL VENDOR NCT PAYABLE '1'0'.AL CCMMUNITY SLRVICES CHECK M" T TOTAL CONW.JNITY SERVTCRS NEI PAYA3L,E T0PA:, GENE-PAL FJNC CHECK AM- TOTAL GEN?RA:, FJNC Nz. PAYABLE W RUN CA'TF. 08/-3/13 TT?4_ - 4:34:05 PACE 1 SAL3S TAX DISC DATE CII3_< A?!T USR TAX D -SC AMT NET ?AYA3L3 ?.00 C6/30/03 - 525.00 0.01, 0.50 52 .00 O.CO 06/30/03 200.00 0.00 O.00 - 200.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING -1025. CO - 1!125.1-0 - 1025. "O 1025.00 - 1025.20 1025.00 09/1.!/03 DISC CATE C '1 "Y OF MOnkPARK, CA -)1SC AM: AC70UNTING PERIOD: 2/03 ^.00 MANUAL CHECK ACTIV:TY 0.00 2902 - MRA AREA 1 - INCk & O' -4ER :06.00 O.00 07/22/03 - 54.0(: MMCET UNIT ACCO[1N" VEN..;Ok 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT ?RO ^RAY CASH ACCT CCNIA1 ;', D= SCRIPTION TIC TNVOTCF CHK CA'.E AC'COUN'1 C-IECK NO 79 (,2 57.0n :U-1E C... HERNANDEZ N 08/13/03 i10: APC /3;03 iCA INST MEALS, ?RKK; 20 EXP RF-- 5/10 0'//30/03 113438 V 2907 X500 -UL1E C.T. NERNANCZZ N 08/1x/03 I10, A?J73003 RCA :NST XILEV;E 20 FXP REP /10 01/30/03 313438 V IC IA:, V3NOOP CHECK A-Ml TOTAL V =NDC:c \_:' PAYABLE TOTAL MRA AREA 1 -: \ -"k & OTHFR CHECK AM.'. TO. "AL M3A AREA 1 _ \;;k & OTHER N -T PAYABLE '.O'I'A- MkA AkEA 1 iNCR & OTHER CHECK AMT TOTAL iRA AREA 1 -INCR & O -HER NET' - AYA3L- TCTAL R -PCRT CHECK AMT 10`1 AT. RFP(,R- Nc" PAYABLE k.l t, r .� RUN DATE. 08/:3/0 3 TIME :4:34:05 PAC 2 SALES TAX DISC CATE CHECK AXT La_ -AX -)1SC AM: NET PA.YARI,F ^.00 :17/22/0'3 - :06.00 0.00 0.00 :06.00 O.00 07/22/03 - 54.0(: 0.00 O.JJ 54.00 160.03 - 1CO.C2 - 160.00 160.00 160.3,' - 160.00 - 1185.00 1185.00 PFNTAMAT70N FUN-) ACCCUNT-NG PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/16/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 12:20:14 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 113396 1101 07/18/03 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 113397 1101 07/18/03 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 113398 1101 07/18/03 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 113399 1101 07/18/03 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 113400 1101 07/18/03 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT !v C i ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- CANCER INSURANCE UNION DUES CASE USD020444 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION IDk9600616061 PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 AMOUNT 140.02 419.68 1,693.00 179.00 168.46 2,600.16 2,600.16 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/16/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 12:20:17 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT \ �l �.d AMOUNT 2,600.16 2,600.16 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:02:33 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 113577 1101 08/01/03 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 113578 1101 08/01/03 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 113579 1101 08 /01/03 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 113580 1101 08/01/03 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 113581 1101 08/01/03 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 TOTAL FUND 1'O'. "AL REPORT V ------- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- CANCER INSURANCE UNION DUES CASE #SD020444 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION ID #9600616061 PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 AMOUNT 130.02 425.36 1,693.00 179.00 168.46 2,595.84 2,595.84 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:02:38 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT I Y C.. C 'a AMOUNT 2,595.84 2,595.84 I'F:N'!'AMATLCN FUND A ACCOUNTING DATE: 08 /13/03 C CITY OF XOORFARK, C CA _ _ T1: {7: 12:37:47 C CHECK REGISTER F :1N"; - 1 C00 - C C—LNERAL FUND ('F.FCK NCMR-'R CAS:i A A,—C'I DATE ISSUED - -------------- V VENJCR -------- - - - - -- A ACC': - ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- i �j 2) PACE NJMDER: 1 VENCHK2! ACCC:INTING P--:RI:;C: 2103 AMOUNT 120.02 4 C.0 o93.00 179.00 :68.46 2,57G.53 2, 57C•.53 PENTAMATION - F;;ND ACCO:JNTING PACE NUMBER: 1 DA'.`E: G8 /13/C3 CTTV OF MOORPAR.K, :CA VENCHK21 -V.Z: - 2:37:53 CHECK RFG:STER - F:;VD TOTAi.S ACCOUNTING ?:::kCOD; 2./0 F:;N;) FUND '1'1' -' E 1000 GENERAL FUND 707AL REPORT \v 1 � L� AMC; ;'.NT 2,5701 53 2.571;.53 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/ -0/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 12:44:17 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1C00 - GENERAL FUND C17ECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 113380 1101 07/09/03 3620 BOB BURNS PRODUCTIONS 9103 '13381 1101 07/09/03 1084 BURNS, NANCY 9222 113382 1101 0'1/09/03 1102 CALIFORNIA PARK & RFCREAT 9221 113383 1101 07/09/03 2038 CAPRCBM 9220 113383 i101 07/09/03 2038 CAPRCBM 9221 TOTAL CHECK :13384 1101 07/09/03 1525 CAREER TRACK 9222 1:3385 1101 07/09/03 1142 COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURC 9212 113386 1101. 07/09/03 1179 DIAL SECURITY 9103 !13386 1i01 07/09/03 1179 DIAL SECURITY 9103 TOTAL CHECK 113387 1101 07/09/03 3207 EAST VENTURA COUNTY EMPLO 9220 '13388 1101. 07/09/03 1659 I A A P 9221 113389 1101, 07/09/03 2223 ICMA DUES RENEWAL 9221 113390 1101 07/09/03 2275 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 91-22 113391 1101 07/09/03 1361 M,ATILIJA WATER CCMPANY, I 9205 113391 '_101 07/09/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, 1: 9205 113391 1101 07/09/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 113391 1i01 07/09/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 92C5 11339' 1101 07/09/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 113391 110i 07/09/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, i 9205 TOTAL CHECK 113392 1101 07/09/03 1462 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ASS 9220 113393 1101 07/09/03 2767 :'WITCHELL, DOROTHY 9244 113394 1101 07/09/03 1593 U.S. POSTMASTER 9231 113395 1101 07/09/03 1698 VENTURA COUNTY - MCC PROG 9102 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT t i t3 ------- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- SR CTR EVENT ENTERTAI INTERGOVERNMENTAL RE•_, 03 /04ROTHSCHILD DUES 03/04 CPRS SUBSCRIPTI PRKS & REC COMM DUES CHUDOBA- BUSINESS WRIT 7/03- 12 /03CHP LEASE 7 /03SPADYRIDGE BUFFER 7 /03AVRC MONITORING 7 /03- 6 /04MEMBERSHIP 03 /04MEM3ERSHIP DUES 03/04 H RILEY DUES 7/03- 6 /04EMP RELATION 7 /03PRKS & PW WATER 7 /03AVRC WATER 7 /03PW BLDG WATER 7 /03PRKS & PW WATER 7 /03ANNEX WATER 7 /03COM FACIL WATER 10 /03- 10 /04SU13SCRIPTI 7/8 CAMP MPK EVENT 8 /03SR CTR NEWSLETTER MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTI PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 AMOUNT 75.00 694.91 140.00 200.00 825.00 1,025.00 159.00 11,675.']1 180.00 180.00 360.00 50.00 125.00 800.00 2,380.00 23.75 28.50 17.50 23.75 24.00 136.00 253.50 81.00 495.00 290.00 190.10 18,800.22 18.800.22 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/10/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 T-ME: 12:44:21 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL. SERVICES FUND 160.00 1000 GENERAL FUND 5,672.00 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 180.00 2400 PARK MAINTENANC= DISTRICT 203. " /5 2605 GAS TAX 23.75 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE/INC 885.01 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 11,675.71 TOTAL REPORT 18,800.22 / Y PENTAMATION - FUND ACCCJNT =NG VENDOR PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/09/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA BPAYAB61 40663 TIM=: 17 :11:48 100071000000 9221 BATCH PAYABLES EDIT LIST BY ALPHA VENDOR N 0.00 RECORD BATCH ENTERED PURCHASE OR P/F BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR VENDOR NAME SNGL CK SALES TAX AMOUNT PERIOD ENTRY BY DOE DATE CASH ACC'" 1099 PROGRAM ACCOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION DISC DATE HOLD USE TAX DISCOUNT 40668 070903 07/09/03 100076107619 9103 3620 BC8 BURNS PRODUCTIONS N 0.00 75.00 ./03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 M 7/30 EVENT SR CTR EVENT ENTER 07/01/2003 Y 0.00 OC TOTAL VENDOR 75.00 40659 0'709C3 07/09/03 290124200000 9222 1084 BURNS, NANCY N 0.00 694.91 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1.101 N MPA COURSE INTERGOVER \MENTAL 07/01/2003 Y 0.00 .00 EXCEEDS CASH BALANCE TOTA1, VENDOR 694.91 40662 070903 07/09/03 100076100000 9221 1102 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECRE N 0.00 140.00 1 /C3 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 024000 03 /04ROTHSCIIILD DU 05/15/2003 Y 0.00 .00 DUPLICATE INIVOICE ON FILE TOTAL VENDOR 140.00 40663 070903 07/09/03 100071000000 9221 2038 CAPRCBM N 0.00 825.00 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 1668 PRKS & REC COMM. DO 06/30/2003 Y 0.00 .00 40664 C70903 07/09/03 100071000000 9220 2038 CAPRCBM N 0.00 200.00 1 /C3 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 1668 03/04 CPRS SUBSCRI 06/30/2003 Y 0.00 .00 _025.00 TOTAL VENDOR 40667 070903 07/09/03 100021000000 9222 1525 CAREER ':RACK IN 0.00 159.00 1/03 ACERVANT' 07/09/03 1101 N 6655497 CHUDOBA - BUSINESS W 05/30/2003 Y 0.00 .00 TOTAL VENDOR 159.00 40678 0'/0903 07/09/03 290224100000 9212 1142 COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHU N 0.00 1- 675.71 1/03 ACERVANT 0'7/C9/03 1101 N 7/03 -12/03 7/03- 12 /03CIIP LEAS C7/01/2CO3 Y 0.00 .00 EXCEEDS CASH BALANCE 70TAL VENDOR 1 1675.7' �i c: s�R Cj PENTA:4A710N - 7UN7 ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 07/09/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA BPAYA861 TIME: 1'1:11:48 BATCH PAYABT.FS EDIT LIST BY ALPHA VENDOR RECORD BATCH ENTERED PURCHASF OR P/F BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR VENDOR NAME SNGL CK SALES TAX AMOUNT PERIOD ENTRY BY DUE DATE CASH ACCT 1C99 PROGRAM.. ACCOUNT INVOICE DESCRIPTION DISC DATE HOLD USE TAX DISCOJNT 40679 070903 07/09/03 240078007803 91C3 1179 DIAL SECURITY N 0.00 180.00 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 22156 7 /03AVRC MONITORIN 06/27/2003 Y 0.00 .00 EXCEEDS CASH BALANCE 40680 C70903 07/09/03 230879007901 9103 11'79 DIAL SECURITY N 0.00 180.00 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 22231 7 /03SKADYRIDGE BUF 06/27/2003 Y 0.00 .00 TO':"AL VENDOR 360.00 40671 070903 07/09/03 100031100000 9220 3207 EAST VENTURA COUNTY EMP N 0.00 50.00 ;/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 03 DUES 7 /03- 6 /04MEMBERSHI 06/16/2003 Y 0.00 .00 TOTAL VENDOR 50.00 40661 07C903 07/09/03 100021000000 9221 1659 I A A P N 0.00 125.00 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N ID #6310320 03 /04MEMBERSHIP DO 04/23/2003 Y 0.00 .00 DUPLICATE INVOICE ON FILE TOTAL VENDOR 125.00 40666 070903 07/09/03 100021000000 9221 2223 ICMA DUES RENEWAL N 0.00 800.00 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 362167755 03/04 H RILEY DUES 07/01/2003 Y 0.00 .00 TOTAL VENDOR 800.00 40660 070903 07/09/03 100031100000 9122 2275 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHI MOR N 0.00 2380.00 :/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 31891 7/03- 6 /04EMP RELAT 05/27/2003 Y 0.00 .00 TOTAL VENDOR 2380.00 40681 C709C3 07/09/03 100076207701 9205 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, N 0.00 28.50 1/03 ACERVANT 07/09/03 1101 N 255570 v 7 /03AVRC WATER C6/30/2003 Y 0.00 .00 DUPLICATE INVOICE ON FILE Q 40G82 070903 07/09/03 010057000000 9205 1361 MATTLIJA WATER COMPANY, N 0.00 24.00 1/03 ACERVANT 0/ /09/03 1101 N 257444 7 /03ANNEX WATER 06/30/2003 Y 0.00 .00 EXCEEDS CAS:1 2ALANCE D"JPLICA"E INVCICE ON FILE O, \r �a E .� PENTA.MATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 1:3499 1101 07/31/03 1006 A -1 LOCK AND SAFE 9204 CH LOCK BOX KEYS 30.03 113500 1101 07/31/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 7/11 652.50 113501 1101 07/31/03 1007 ACCURATE ANSWERING SERVIC 9420 8 /03FAX & ANSWERING 67.50 113502 1101 07/31/03 1660 AIRTEL PLAZA HOTEL 9225 8/10 -21 LODGING -DARE 1,190.16 113503 110i 07/31/03 1029 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIA 9221 03/04 HOGAN APA MEMBE 220.00 113503 1101 07/31/03 1029 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIA 9221 03/04 CA LA MEMBERSHI 60.00 113503 1101 07/31/03 1029 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIA 9220 03/04 APA JOURNAL 42.00 TOTAL CHECK 322.00 ::3504 1101 07/31/03 2574 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 9252 AVCP PUMP REPAIR 110.68 113504 1101 07/31/03 2574 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 9252 AVCP WELL REPAIR 271.21 TOTAL CHECK 381.89 113505 1101 07/31/03 3580 BARON BROTHERS NURSERY 9630 AVCP PHASE II TREES 9,436.71 113506 1101 07/31/03 2490 BJORKLAND, PAMELA G. 9160 BELLYDANCE INSTRUCTOR 126.00 113507 1101 07/31/03 3566 BUSBY, RODRIGO 9160 KARATE INSTRUCTION 1,023.00 113508 1101 07/31/03 3634 CANTWELL, CHRISTOPHER 9244 REIMBURSE -TEEN TRAVEL 105.98 113509 1301 07/31/03 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9285 PROPERTY PURCHASE 12,425.00 113510 1101 07/31/03 2611 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA 9223 8/8 MTG - MILLHOUSE 30.00 113510 1101 07/31/03 2611 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA 9223 8/8 MTG -MAYOR HUNTER 30.00 TOTAL CHECK 60.00 113511 1101 07/31/03 3296 CLARK, GREGORY J. 9244 ADLT BASKETBALL FEE 20.00 113512 1101 07/31/03 1137 COASTAL PIPCO 9252 AVRC DRINK FOUNTAIN R 76.52 113513 1101 07/31/03 3176 COMPLETE PROPERTY MAINTEN 9102 7 /03TR FOUNTAIN MAINT 200.00 113514 1101 07/31/03 3649 COX, RON 9160 GOLF INSTRUCTION 1,312.50 113515 3.101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03COMM SRVC VISION 7.20 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PL.ANNING VISION 7.95 :13515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 3751 8 /03COBRA VISION 8.00 113515 110: 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03C MGR VISION 52.60 :13515 110: 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03FINANCE VISION 57,81 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03CEO VISION 20.67 11-3515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03COMM DEV VISION 23.88 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03C CLERK VISION 44.60 113515 1' -01 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03COMM DEV VISION 13.93 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03TEEN COOR VISION 23.80 113515 ` � ✓ 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PW VISION 14.45 1135151101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03VECTOR VISION 41.40 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03REC VISION 42.70 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03SR CTR VISION 15.90 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03SR CTR VISION 31.05 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PRKNG ENF VISION 16.51 113515 6 •� 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03ADMTN VISION 20.70 rr_) PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: C7/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND HECK NU'TBFR CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION — AMOUNT 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03HR VISION 8.00 113515 1:01 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03ADMIN VISION 32.70 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03MRA VISION 13.40 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03X -GUARD VISION 9.75 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03NPDES VISION .56 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PLANNING VISION 74.98 113515 1101 07/31./03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03ST MAINT VISION 89.58 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 901.0 8/03AD842 VISION 7,25 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PARKS VISION 20.70 113515 1.101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03AD842 VISION .10 113515 110: 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03AD842 VISION 1.24 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03MRA /ECO VISION 35.70 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03AD842 VISION .10 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03SLD WST VISION .80 113515 110! 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PARKS VISION 48.50 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03PUB TRANS VISION 4.40 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03SLD WST VISION 15.60 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8/03AD842 VISION 1.19 113515 1i01 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03CEO VISION .40 113515 1101 07/31/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 8 /03CDBG VISION 1.60 TOTAL CHECK 809.70 113516 1101 07/31/03 2202 CUTSFORTH, SUSAN 3862 REFUND -KIDS NIGHT 35.00 113517 1'_01 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY ILALL PAPER SUPPL 144.73 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9203 CITY HALL PAPER SUPPL 144.73 113517 1101 0'7/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV SUPPLIES 50.00 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM DEV RETURN -50.00 11351.7 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C MGR SUPPLIES 73.40 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9205 C MGR FLIP CHART 220.72 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 MRA SUPPLIES 8.09 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 MRA /HOUSING SUPPLIES 77.81 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 COMM SRVC SUPPLIES 114.93 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 AVRC SUPPLIES 86.72 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 MRA /HOUSING SUPPLIES 14.16 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 PW SUPPLIES 94.96 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9208 SR CTR MAILING LABELS 55.49 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 C CLERK SUPPLIES 23.58 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 ADMIN SUPPLIES 93.64 113517 1i01 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 FINANCE SUPPLIES 10.03 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 157.33 113517 1101 07/31/03 1172 DATA BYTE CENTRAL INC 9202 CITY HALL RETURN - 199.79 TOTAL CHECK 1,120.53 113518 1101 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/9 TEEN TRAVEL CAMP 421.41 113518 i'_01 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/7 TEEN TRAVEL CAMP 414.14 113518 1101 07/31/03 119'7 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/2 TEEN TRAVEL CAMP 207.83 113518 - 11.01 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/9 CAMP MPK BUS 249.47 113518 - 1101 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/3 TEEN TRAVEL CAMP 397.55 113518 ►,1101 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 7/2 CAMP MPK BUS 265.69 113518 4 ✓ 1101 07/31/03 1.197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 TEEN TRAVEL BUS TRANS 850.21 113518 ( j1101 07/31/03 1197 DURHAM SCHOOL SERVICES 9244 CMP MPK BUS TRANSPORT 328.45 TOTAL CHECK 3,134.75 113519 1 11101 07/31/03 3635 EVANS, CASSANDRA 9160 DANCE INSTRUCTION 1,305.00 V PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 113520 1101 07/31/03 1220 FENCE FACTORY RENTALS 9252 7 -8/03 85 HIGH ST FEN 107.21 1 -3521 1101 07/31/03 2634 FETCHET, ERIC 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 60.00 1:3521 1101 07/31/03 2634 FETCHET, ERIC 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 60.00 TOTAL CHECK 120.00 113522 1101 07/31/03 1222 FIFTH AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 CEO UNIFORM CLEANING 13.20 113523 1101 07/31/03 3651 FILIPOFF, SOLANGE 3866 REFUND -CAMP MPK 126.00 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE .65 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE .65 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 45.78 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PLANNING DNTL,LIF 567.22 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03CEO DNTL,LIFE 4.65 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03C CLERK DNTL,LIFE 553.21 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03COMM SRVCS DNTL 55.33 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03NPDES DNTL,LIFE 3.72 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03MRA /ECO DNTL,LIFE 176.56 113524 i101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PUB TRANS DNTL,LI 39.01 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03FINANCE DNTL,LIFE 342.92 113524 1:01 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03HR DNTL,LIFE 45.73 113524 '- -101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03MRA DNTL,LIFE 82.34 113524 :101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03AD842 DNTL,LIFE 7,85 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03COM DEV DNTL,LIFE 87.02 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PARKS DNTL,LIFE 311.96 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03CEO DNTL,I,IFE 124.26 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03SR CTR DNTL,LIFE 130.80 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03VECTOR DNTL,LIFE 261.60 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03C MGR DNT,LIFE 520.55 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03COMM DEV DNTL,LIF 186.96 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03SLD WST DNTL,LIFE 176.21 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03ADMIN DNTL,LIFE - 108.31 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03CDBG DNTL,LIFE 9.15 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03ADMIN DNTL,LIFE 115.52 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03SLD WST DNTL,LIFE 4.57 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03COMM FAC DNTL,LI'r 196.21 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PRKNG ENF DNTL 107.15 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03TEEN COOR DNTL 45.73 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03REC DNTL,LIFE 233.28 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03% -GUARD DNTL,LIFE 59.29 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03ST MAINT DNTL,LIF 459.03 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PARKS DNTL,LIFE 130.80 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8/03ADS43 DNTL,LIFE 9.74 113524 1101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PLANNING DNTL,LIF 65.40 113524 :101 07/31/03 1684 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE 9010 8 /03PW DNTL,LIFE 89.56 TOTAL CHECK 5,142.10 113525 1101 07/31/03 3639 FREEFORM PHOTOGRAPHY 9240 20TH ANNIV PHOTOS 100.00 113526 )1101 07/31/03 3470 GARY M HALL 9244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 134.88 113526 "1101 07/31/03 3470 GARY M HALL 9244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 105.01 TOTAL CHECK 239.89 113527 t ?1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03SLD WST EAP 7.05 113527 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03SLD WST EAP .36 01101 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 4 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --- AMOUNT 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PUB TRANS EAP 1.99 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03AD842 EAP .22 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03ADS42 EAP .24 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PARKS EAP 9.58 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03ST MAINT EAP 19.13 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03TEEN COOR EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PW EAP 2.65 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03NPDES EAP .14 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03REC EAP 10.84 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03CEO EAP 4.69 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03COMM DEV EAP 4.33 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PLANNING EAP 17.88 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03VECTOR EAP 7.22 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PARKS EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03COMM FAC EAP 5.42 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03SR CTR EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03COMM SRVCS EAP 3.25 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03ADMIN EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 6/03AD842 EAP .02 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03CDBG EAP .72 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03ADS42 EAP 1.24 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03C MGR EAP 18.07 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 IIOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03C CLERK EAP 14.45 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03HR EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03ADMIN EAP 9.03 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8/03AD842 EAP .02 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03FINANCE EAP 16.25 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PRKNG ENF EAP 3.61 11352'1 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03MRA /ECO EAP 5.42 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03PLANNING EAP 1.81 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03COMM DEV EAP 3.61 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03CEO EAP .17 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03X -GUARD EAP 2.85 113527 1101 07/31/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 8 /03MRA EAP 4.69 TOTAL CHECK 195.00 113528 1101 07/31/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 ALL PARKS PARTS 86.71 113528 1101 07/31/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9205 MPK PD SUPPLIES 15.66 TOTAL CHECK 102.37 113529 1101 07/31/03 3484 HONDA OF HOLLYWOOD 9254 MPK PD BIKE BATTERY 116.84 113530 1101 07/31/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9252 AVCP CLEANING SUPPLIE 47.73 113530 1101 07/31/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 COMM FAC CLEANING SUP 74.46 113530 1101 07/31/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9252 AVRC CLEANING SUPPLIE 211.93 113530 1101 07/31/03 1286 HOUSE SANITARY SUPPLY 9204 COMM FAC CLEANING SUP 537.43 TOTAL CHECK 871.55 113531 1101 07/31/03 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9211 7 /03FAX RENTAL 58.99 113531 1101 07/31/03 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9211 6 /03FAX MACHINE RNTL 58.99 r TOTAL CHECK 117.98 ( � 113532 (j 1101 07/31/03 1312 JOLLY JUMPS INC 9243 7 /11TEEN DANCE 400.00 113533 Ej'� 1103 07/31/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 7/03 AVRC JANITORIAL 960.00 113533 j.f 1101 07/31/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 7 /03SR CTR JANITORIAL 589.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 5 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - -- -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 1:3533 1101 07/31/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 7 /03PW BLDG JANITORIA 180.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,729.00 113534 1101 07/31/03 3127 KING, GWEN 9160 VOCAL TECHNIQUE INSTR 180.00 113535 1101 07/31/03 3523 KING, STEPHEN J. 9160 PRESCHOOL MUSIC INSTR 378.00 113536 1101 07/31/03 3069 LAZER STAR 9244 7 /18CAMP MPK TRIP 640.00 113537 1101 07/31/03 2275 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 9220 FLSA COMPLIANCE GUIDE 101.89 113538 1101 07/31/03 3652 LIFE SKILLS FOR AMERICAN 2606 REFUND-SECURITY DEPOS 150.00 113538 1101 07/31/03 3652 LIFE SKILLS FOR AMERICAN 3850 REFUND -AV PRK USE FEE 30.00 TOTAL CHECK 180.00 113539 1101 07/31/03 2157 LISTER PARTY RENTALS 9244 7/3 STAGE RENTAL 1,553.77 113540 1101 07/31/03 2701 LOHMAN, DEPUTY TIM 9225 8/10 -22 DARE. TRAINING 650.00 113541 1101 07/31/03 2221 LOPEZ, GLEN 9244 ADLT BASKETBALL FEE 20.00 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03CDBG LTD,STD 8.36 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03ST MAINT LTD,STD 174.50 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03ADS42 LTD,STD 3.66 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03C MGR LTD,STD 220.02 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PARKS LTD,STD 18.08 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03COMM DEV LTD,STD 62.35 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03FINANCE LTD,STD 159.43 113542 1' -01 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03IS MGR LTD,STD 36.08 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03ADMIN LTD,STD 94.93 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03HR LTD,STD 26.83 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PW LTD,STD 22.74 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03CEO LTD,STD 38.42 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03NPDES LTD,STD 1.52 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE: 901.0 8 /03VECTOR LTD,STD 58.67 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03X -GUARD LTD,STD 12.83 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PRKNG ENF LTD,STD 26.52 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03COMM DEV LTD,STD 34.09 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03C CLERK LTD,STD 122.00 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03COMM SRVC LTD,STD 38.99 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03SR CTR LTD,STD 34.26 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03COMM FAC LTD,STD 39.67 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PLANNING LTD,STD 12.16 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL, BUSINESS CF. 9010 8 /03AVRC LTD,STD 110.89 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03TEEN COOR LTD,STD 22.04 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PRKS LTD,STD 83.02 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PLANNING LTD,STD 223.92 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03AD842 LTD,STD 12.43 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03ADS42 LTD,STD .12 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03ADS42 LTD,STD .12 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8/03ADS42 LTD,STD 1.46 113542 i 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03MRA LTD,STD 41.47 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03CDBG SR LTD,STD 7.44 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03MRA /ECO LTD,STD 45.92 113542 X1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03SLD WST LTD,STD 4.41 113542 i )1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03SLD WST LTD,STD 45.99 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENClIK21 TIME: 14:26:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03PUB TRANS LTD,STD 19.61 113542 1101 07/31/03 2546 METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CE 9010 8 /03CEO LTD,STD 1.13 TOTAL CHECK 1,866.08 113543 1101 07/31/03 1978 MITY -LITE, INC. 9245 GRAY CIRCULAR TABLES 1,497.26 113544 1101 07/31/03 1750 MOBILE. MINT, INC. 9103 7/18 -8/14 BIN RNTL 72.40 113545 1101 07/31/03 1671 MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL D 9212 7 /03MPK PD UTILITIES 1,810.00 113546 1101 07/31/03 1397 MR. T'S CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 9205 MPK PD VOLUNTEER EMBL 643.50 113547 1101 07/31/03 1400 MUNIMETRIX, INC 9102 CI -SSA INDEX SOFTWARE 480.00 113548 1101 07/31/03 2075 NEW HORIZONS 9222 MARTIN- ACCESS 02 200.00 113548 1101 07/31/03 2075 NEW HORIZONS 9222 LEMCKE- ACCESS 02 200.00 113548 1101 07/31/03 2075 NEW HORIZONS 9222 WILLIAMS- ACCESS 02 200.00 TOTAL CHECK 600.00 113549 1101 07/31/03 3648 NHLBI HEALTH INFORMATION 9205 STAY ACTIVE, FEEL BET 187.00 113550 1101 07/31/03 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 CASILLAS SAFETY BOOTS 200.00 113551 1101 07/31/03 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 7 /03CITY RTE,TR SWEEP 6,742.09 113551 - 1101 07/31/03 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9350 7 /03STATE RTE SWEEPIN 561.33 TOTAL CHECK 7,303.42 113552 1101 07/31/03 1210 PAS /EMECO 9250 03 /04EQUIP MAINTENANC 125.00 113552 1101 07/31/03 1210 PAS /EMECO 9250 03 /04POSTAGE MACHINE 255.00 TOTAL CHECK 380.00 113553 1101 07/31/03 1735 PATTERSON, STACY 9244 3RD OF JULY EVENT SRV 80.64 113554 1101 07/31/03 3571 PLANTE, THERESA 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 60.00 113555 1101 07/31/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 7/2C COUNCIL PACKETS 314.99 113555 1101 07/31/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 MPK PD TO RHF INC 19.62 TOTAL CHECK 334.61 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 24.10 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 21.72 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 21.71 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 18.12 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 23.61 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.52 113556 1:01 07/31/03 1.464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 23.61 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 36.95 1;3556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 23.61 113556 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 18.12 113556 ( 1101 07/31/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 18.12 TOTAL CHECK 335.15 113557 S 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03ST MAINT MEDICAL 3,121.05 113557 : _% 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03AD842 MEDICAL 82.37 PENTA- MATI0N - FUND ACCOUN'T'ING PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT :13557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03CDBG MEDICAL 53.56 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03MRA MEDICAL 510.82 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPIAYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03MRA /ECO MEDICAL 845.70 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03C MGR MEDICAL 3,639.52 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PUB TRAN MEDICAL 369.64 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 2,016.90 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 54.91 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PARK MEDICAL 1,673.01 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PARK MEDICAL 696.25 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03COM, SRVC MEDICAL 367.60 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03X -GUARD MEDICAL 350.49 113557 !101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03AD842 MEDICAL 207.27 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03COMM DEV MEDICAL 839.30 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03CEO MEDICAL 14.83 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PLANNING MEDICAL 2,608.57 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PRKNG ENF MEDICAL 652.44 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03AD842 MEDICAL 3.48 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 6/03AD842 MEDICAL 3.48 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03ADS42 MEDICAL 41.77 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03COMM FAC MEDICAL 1,098.82 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03ADMIN MEDICAL 675.30 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03ADMIN MEDICAL 2,078.66 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03TEEN COOR MEDICAL 267.78 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03REC MEDICAL 1,764.81 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03HR MEDICAL 964.03 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03NPDES MEDICAL 23.73 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03FINANCE MEDICAL 3,374.75 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PW MEDICAL 546.30 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03COMM DEV MEDICAL 878.65 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03PLANNING MEDICAL 267.78 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03VECTOR MEDICAL 1,543.08 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03SR CTR MEDICAL 593.18 113557 110'- 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 2209 8 /03EMP SHARE MEDICAL 156.00 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8 /03CEO MEDICAL 696.24 113557 1101 07/31/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 8/03C CLERK MEDICAL 2,244.60 TOTAL CHI :CK 35,326.67 113558 1101 07/31/03 1476 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 9208 MPK PD ELECTRONIC EQU 141.82 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 CAMP MPK SUPPLIES 7.27 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 MPK PO SUPPLIES 22.36 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 85.46 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 MPK PD SUPPLIES 16.77 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9222 SEMS EXERCISE REFRESH 58.28 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 44.41 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 7/3 EVENT SUPPLIES 37.08 113559 1101 07/31/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9205 CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 47.73 TOTAL CHECK 319.36 113560 A 1101 Y 07/31/03 1526 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 9160 MINI HAWK,SOCCER CAMP 1,533.00 113561 ( j1101 07/31/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 TEEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 10.78 113561 -'1101 07/31/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 CMP MPK SUPPLIES 206.17 TOTAL CHECK 216.95 1 l 113562 ( ;1101 07/31/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9231 NEWSLETTER SEC MAIL 270.00 }, S PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 8 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- AMOUNT 113562 1101 07/31/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9231 RECREATION SEC MAIL 270.00 113562 1101 07/31/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9240 NEWSLETTER SEC PRINT 2,148.00 113562 1101 07/31/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9232 RECREATION SEC PRINT 3,222.00 TOTAL CHECK 5,910.00 113563 1101 I 07/31/03 3645 STABEN EQUIPMENT 9504 MPK PD GAS GENERATOR 2,445.30 113564 1101 07/31/03 1552 STEVEN GORDON TONER SUPPL 9201 CITY HALL TONER SUPPL 347,49 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03COMM CTR /PED BRID 200.00 1113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03GLENWOOD PRK 1,048.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03POINDEXTER PRK 757.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03MILLER PRK 757.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 SPRING RD WEED ABATEM 1,250.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9102 7/3 EVENT PERSONNEL 200.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE: 9331 AVCP WEED ABATEMENT 660.00 113565 '_101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z3 PEPRML,BTR CRK 141.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z4 WMS RCH PKWYS 276.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03GRIFFIN PRK 1,244.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03TR PRK 2,596.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03MONTE VISTA PRK 336.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03COUNTRY TRAIL PRK 1,730.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03PCH HILL PRK 2,596.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z9 MPK BUS CTR 55.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z8 HOME ACRES BUF 324.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03VIRGINIA COLONY 324.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03AV PRK & PED BRID 5,780.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03CAMPUS CYN PRK 2,596.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03CAMPUS PRK 827.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03METROLINK 308.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z2 SPRING,CHR BAR 2,908.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 7/03 661 MPK AVE 43.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03COLMER ALYSSAS 33.00 11.3565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03VILLA CAMPESINA 293.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z10 MTN MEADOWS 8,058.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03Z13PCH HILL RD 36.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03MTN MEADOWS PRK 2,542.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03CIVIC /COMM CTR 541.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/0321 PECAN,BAMBI 87.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTF. 9252 7/03 18 HIGH ST 70.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03 798 MPK AVE 82.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z5 PCH HILL TO TR 1,183.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z7 MPK SQ IND PK 433.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7 /03PRKWYS & MEDIANS 6,230.00 113565 1101 07/31/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 7/03Z6 GLENHAVEN W EN 50.00 TOTAL CHECK 46,594.00 113566 1101 07/31/03 3105 SWING, JAMES ROBERT 9160 GUITAR INSTRUCTION 648.00 113567 1101 07/31/03 1658 TARGET 9240 20TH ANNIV SUPPLIES 95.54 , 113568 (A 1101 07/31/03 2822 TECHNOLOGY ARTISTS 9244 7/3 SOUND & LIGHTING 4,750.00 113569 ,1101 07/31/03 3650 TRENT, LISA 3866 REFUND -CAMP MPK 76.00 113570 '. 1101 07/31/03 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9240 MPK PD PLATE ENGRAVIN 53.47 PF.NTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 14:28:11 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR -------- - - - - -- ACCT 113571 1101 07/31/03 1593 U.S. POSTMASTER 9231 113571 1101 07/31/03 1593 U.S. POSTMASTER 9231 TOTAL CHECK 113572 1101 07/31/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9232 113572 1101 07/31/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 TOTAL CHECK 113573 1101 07/31/03 3643 WATER BOMB BATTLE ZONE. 9244 113574 1101 07/31/03 1048 WEST GROUP 9220 113574 1101 07/31/03 1048 WEST GROUP 9220 TOTAL CHECK 113575 1101 07/31/03 2289 WESTERN U.S. 9231 113576 1101 07/31/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 113576 1101 07/31/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 113576 1101 07/31/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 TOTAL CHECK TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT O N i �3 C� - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - -- RECREATION SECTION NEWSLETTER SECTION ZONING MAPS SPRING RD BLUELINES CAMP MPK ATTRACTION TITLE 25HCD RENEWAL T13 MOTOR VEHICLES CITY HALL POSTAGE MET AVRC SNACK BAR FAUCET MONTE VISTA PRK MAINT B&S WATER HEATER REPR PAGE NUMBER: 9 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 AMOUNT 1,044.90 348.30 1,393.20 13.30 11.75 25.05 325.00 127.00 216.00 343.00 3,000.00 84.70 11.63 6.42 102.75 166,416.23 166,416.23 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 07/30/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 14:28:15 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/03 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 4,167.97 1000 GENERAL FUND 64,609.05 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 1,241.44 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 9,436.71 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5,840.20 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 7,953.97 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 87.00 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 2,912.37 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 141.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 276.00 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 1,187.37 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 50.00 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 433.00 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 324.00 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 55.00 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 8,110.54 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 33.00 2314 AD 2001 -01 36.00 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 28,624.35 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 11.75 2605 GAS TAX 11,505.64 2609 OTHER ST /FEDERAL GRANTS 2,445.30 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 80.83 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 13,403.90 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 1,230.39 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 742.65 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 2,326.80 6000 FIDUCIARY - GENERAL DEPOS 150.00 TOTAL REPORT 166,416.23 ` ' I ti P_-'j,'.-.A_%lA:TON - AC.COUNT:Nr, PAGE XJMS-P: 1 DATE: 08/13/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VFNCEK21 .-YE: 15,63:23 CEECK ACCCJN. _NG 'FRICD: 2/03 1C•C - GENERAL FJNL) CHECK NUM3--7, CAS*.-* ACC; UA,E rSK:FD -- ------ - - - - -- VENDOR- - - -- AC.CT ------- L)ESCqT?71')N ------- AMO'-'IJ7 '13555 1-01 08/2C/03 1CO3 A T & T 'WIRELESS SFRVICES 9/124 7/C3WA:.T7? -ELLP-CNE 10.65 "13395 1--01 ',8/20/03 IC03 A T WIRCL3SS SERVICES 9424 7/103RILEY CE_LLFHON- 8.93 ''3575 1101 C8/2:�/03 1003 A = & - WIRF'.FSS SERVICES 9424 1/03MCRGENSTERN CELLP _51.__ 1:3595 iic_ Ob/20/03 1003 A & 7 _ W:RLESS SERY I �'FS 9424 7/031;U.NTER CLLJ.TH,)NE . - q. 56 11359D 65/20/03 -003 A I' & T WTPF.T.ESS SERV:C--S 9424 7/03vPK PD CE:,LPHJNE 490./4 11`595 08/20/C3 A T & T WIRELESS SERV7C-S 9424 7/C3J0ANS.'O% CFLLPHON 6.21 11359 '101 08/20/C3 _003 A T & T WTRELESS SERVICES 9424 7/C3B)RC'HARD CELLPHON 39.'7 113595 -101 08/2C/03 1,',C'3 A T & T WIREL--SS SFRVTCFS 9.124 7/03AVRC -FT.T?HONE 7.64 liol C8/2C/03 1003 A - & T WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 7/03-.-'CGAN CELLPACNE ..69 '13595 1-01 :8/20/03 1 C -1 3 A 7 & 7 W:RSLESS S.-,RV T CF.; 942/1 7/631RAFrENSTEDT CF.:,- 6.47 .i3.�95 1-01 08/20/03 1003 A - & 7 WIRELESS SERVICES 9424 7/03C.iUD03A CELLPHJNF 5.69 TOTAT. C-FCY 568.64 1'3596 ll^_ 05/20/03 2690 ACCOUN'rFm?s 9IC2 S7ARO-W-K END 7/18 7Cb./5 113595 08/20/C3 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO WK F.N:-) 7/25 720.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,428.75 113597 11() 1 38/20/03 loll ACCURATE !NCUST.RiAL SUPFI. 9208 PW SY.AL_ 'COOTS, HARV!A 21.51 _13591 1-01 08/20/03 loll ACCURATE INC"-*S7:ZIA:, SJPPL 93.4 PW SAFF7Y SUP?L_ES 35)7 1-01 08/20/01 '011 ACCJTATE i.N -) Li S'.'R A 1. S:IPPL 9203 PW SMAJ 1. TOOLS, KARDWA 25.-*9 ''3597 1:11 08/20/C3 --01 A,-.CJRA.TE I14DUSTR:AL SUPPL 9208 PW SMALL 7CC-S -0.40 '-2597 1101 08/20/C3 i(`:1 A=:RAT-_ INDUS I R -Al . SUP P:, 9208 PW SY-ALI. -CCIS 19.31 113597 110: 08/2C/03 1011 ACCURA-v :NDUSTRIAL SUPPI. 9209 FIN TOOLS 5.35 ,CIAL CHFC'l 85 .-S 113598 1-01 09/20/03 ACCJRAIE 'o;--'LDT\-, 9208 S'. -EEL TICS-S FOR POLLA 125.49 ::3599 lic, 08/2C/03 2465 AIM LSA 5160 CH.7RL=-ADIqG INSPUC. 3,033.01 11_.600 _101 --8/20/03 3661 A'd S7AR SPORTS 9244 12 BASKETBALL JEkS,7Y.'4 16'1.57 C IJi 08/20/03 51658 AL- TRACES CONSIRUCTTON 2795 :,--FJNI; AL)MTN 7,-.RY.IT 24.00 113602 iic_ C8 /2C/03 1025 ALL-AIR• H7ATTN,-, & AIR CO 9251 Sk CTR FREEZ-R R-_-PAIR 173.CO 113502 -_ioi 08/20/03 1025 A:,L-AIRE ll::A-INC & A-R CO 9:03 CI7Y RA-L AC REPAIR 136.00 TOTA:, C=ECK 309.00 - -3CO-- 1_01 08/20/03 3657 ICY:ERICAN WATER WORKS ASSO 922-- 03/04MEYBF3SH-P DUES _.c_Cc 113604 lic- C8/20/03 2697 ACH '4IRLL_-SS 9420 //C3C CLERK PAGERS 6.02 111614 --Jo-- 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 7/03CCY DEV PAGERS 0.00 1136--4 "101 08/20/33 2697 ARCH W:RF'.FSS 9420 7/0.',PARKS PAGERS 9.14 '136C� i'()l 39/20/03 2697 ARC!l WIRELESS 9420, 71030 CCUNCTT PAGERS 56.9- 3604 1-01 38/20/03 2697 ARC'.*j WIRELESS 9420 7/03C MGR PAGERS 32.43 1i36()4 lirl", 08/2C/03 2697 ARCH WIRET-SS 9420 '//C3Fv;R(-,NCY SRVC PAGE 4.10 11--604 iic_ C8/20/01 1-1197 ARCH WIRELESS 9420 7/03PUBLIC lilO-.qKS FA^ ;E 20-0 113604 -10,- 03/20/C3 2697 ARCH WIRELESS 942J 7/0.ICOrX SRVC PAGERS lo.cl; 113604 101 OR/20/C3 2697 ARCH WIR- Ess )420 -//03MRAPAGER 4.57 I 06/20/03 2697 ARC' WIR_LEss 942C 7/33FAC - Li , F.13 PAGERS 5.53 3r54 1-31 08/20/03 269*1 AR(.*.-* WIRELESS 9L20 7/03RECREATION PAGER 113604 ♦ 11C' 02/2C/03 2697 A.*4,:H WTRFLESS 9420 7/03PRKNG ENF PAGERS 5.53 75.44 1_01 08/23/03 103/ ARROWH7AT' DRINKING WATER 5204 V7('.TOR WATER (:;PS -. -3 --3(05 1-01 OR12rIO3 10?7 ARROWHEAD LR,NKTN( WATER 9205 7/03H3FAXROOM S JPPLIE 234.92 TOTAL CHECK 236.05 I'F.NIAMATTCN - -:;NC ACCOON"ING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 5S/13/03 CITY OF MCORPA::K, CA VE \CFK21 TIX -F: 15:53:29 CHECK RFG-STER ACCCJNT:NC PERTO7: 2/03 FUND - 1COO - GENERAL F;; \D CHECK N;;MBER CAS:A ACCT DATE ISSJED ----------- VEN,)Ok - ------ ------ ACCT ------- DESCRI -,- TON - - - - - -- AMOUNT .:3506 ''_O1 ,8/2''/03 1.078 BSN SPORTS 9205 :ITN MEADG'WS BSK.JL 40.66 '13606 ..0' 06/20/03 1078 BSN SPORTS 9205 CAPS PRK BSKT31- NETS !0.65 08/20/033 1078 BSN Sz1O :t'I'S 9205 C.`IPS CYN BSKTRT NETS 40.65 113606 . -.G' 08/20/03 1078 BSN SPORTS 9205 COLLEGE VIEW BSKT3L 47.65 113GO5 _:G' 08/20/1'3 10/8 ISSN S ?OR TS 52:•5 PCH HILL R.SZTBL NETS 4C.65 i13605 -'O' ^3/20/03 1073 3SN SPORTS 5205 TISRRA REJADA 3SK':3L, 40.66 '_''CAL CHECK 2.13. J2 :13507 1-0- 09/2C/03 3655 C -CAD BLL;ELIN= SERVICE 2790 RFF:"NO -ADMIN DEPOSIT 2GI.00 =13606 1'0' 09/2C/C3 2036 CAPRC3b: 922' ?RKS k REC COMI :ISSIJN 365.00 '_13509 1 -0� 02 /2C /C3 36F4 - -LARK, LAURA 3862 REFUND -3 -CS NIGHT 20.00 '13510 11.0' '8/20/03 ,655 CLEARWAT2R FI3ERGLASS PCO 2795 REFUNC -ADMIN CEPOS -.' 254.00 _:3611 1121 ^8/20/0-5 1136 CCAC:: JSA 9103 7/23SR CTR TRIP 738.5C - .36'.2 _101 08/20/03 :144 CON.PUWAVF 9503 PARKS OF- ICE PRI\:'F.R 406.48 1-35'2 '101 08/20/03 '44 COMF;;WAVE 9504 MPY. PC COMPLITER,PRINT 4,651.43 113612 --01' 08/20/73 1'44 COMPi;WAV2 93:04 MFK PD COMPJ7'ER MCN -T _,141.14 .'OIAL CH?C'K 5,199.05 1136L3 11 ^,1 03/27/0? 3155 CONSULTING E:;:;'K22kS 6 `.,A 9220 NAP ACT,CA E\V,C -tQA '109.' 3614 1171 06 /20/03 -996 COPIER LL :'FE 9203 S2 CI'R COPIER 'AATNTF..N _.,596.00 3C'3 '101 08/20/03 - -// DEMCC. TNC 5225 DOUBLE STRT? ADHESIVE 1'•.04 36'� '.O1 08/2C/03 1177 D2MCC INC 92-15 DOUBLE STRIP ACHE:SIVF POC 59.16 °OTAI. CHECK 70.23 113616 1'0' 08/20/C3 1179 DIAL, SFCCRI "Y 9103 A /G?SHADYRIDG2 DIFFER 180.00 113615 1'0' 08/20/C3 1179 DIAL SECURI.Y 9'03 8 /03AVCP MJNI'1'ORTNG 160.00 1'O1'A- C'i_Ca 367.00 113517 1101. 08/20/03 118. DICECCO, MARK 9731 7/ yTG CJMPENSA'F-ON '_00.70 1131,12 11,11 JS /20/63 2320 DTG -TA', TFLECOIfi4UN I CAT =CN 9102 8 /C3AV3C,CGM 1,7R SRVC 284.00 1136'.8 :101 38/20/03 2320 CIG=TAL TELL'COMYUN- CATION 9102 8 /C3PW =P P -CNE VA -NT 15J.00 :0'.AL CHECK 4334.00 3f 19 1:0- 08/20/C3 1186 D.ISPENSINC IE:C'F.NOL,CGY COR 9301 PW PAINT SUPP -TFS '53.98 '-.3019 1 -01 08/20/C3 1186 DISPENSING TECHNOLCOY C'O:i 9301 PW PAINT SU?PIJ -S 20.44 :'3019 1101. 08/20/C: 1186 -)- SP=.NSTNG TECHNOLOGY CCR 93_0 ?W ASP ?A!T S:IPPL.IES 168.7; '1'O1'A- CH?C{ 4'3.15 11 ?620 1101 C3 /20/03 3040 CNA ELLC'1'RIC 9'033 GLENWOOU ELECTRTCAL 11302' - 0- '18/20/'3 169C DOY1•F SHAW ICE 52,4 VECT):R 7RY TCE __3622 11101 02/20/03 119E C'1NN- --DWARDS CCRPORATION 9252 VTT,T,A CAMPESINA PAINT 23.33 _13622 y11 "1 08/20/03 9E U'-'NN dJWARDS CCR ?ORATION 9252 GLENWOCU PAINT SUPPLI 23.39 113622 '101 �)-10'_ 39/2,, ^. /03 --96 DJ \N- EDWARDS CORFORA::CN 9252 MTN MEACCWS PAINT -8.93 x.45 113672 ')6/2'/53 1196 OUNN- F.nWA.RDS CORPORA"'CN 9252 X'.N MFA-,CV!S PAINT SUP 1136,22 (-)-_-_o_ O8 /::0/03 1196 DUN\- EUWARL'S CORPORATSON 9252 XONI'E VISTA PAINT SUI 23.39 PEN='AMAT:O\ - FUND ACCC:;N' -.ING PW PAINT SUPPL-LS 83•)2 DA-E: C8/13/03 23.39 CNiPS PAINT SUP ?L, -=S CITY 0_ MOORPARK, CA 1'1X3: -5:53:2) POINDF.XTER FAINT SUPP CHECK -,E0:S'I'ER FUND - 100C CENFR.AI., FUND PCH 3:ILL FAINT SUPPLI 23.39 C -FCK NUb:BE3 :ASA ACC, DATE ISSUED - - - - - - ----- VENDCR - - - - - -- - -- ACC- 1:3622 110 -. 08/20/C3 =196 -)CNN - EDWARDS CCRPCRA.TTON 93 ,-1 li3622 1:01 09 /20/03 1_96 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 1.13622 1::11 09/2C/O3 1i96 DUNK- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 :1.3622 1101. 08/20/0> 1196 CJNN-=DAARCS CORP:;:.A'1_C-N 9301 -13622 '10' ,-3/20'/03 19 ;, DJNN- EDWAR:JS CORPORATION 32D2 1'3,22 Ili,= ^8/20/C3 :196 JUNK - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 1' 3622 11Ci 08 /2C /03 x:96 DUN\ - EDWARDS CO'?PORA -_TON 9252 113622 1'01 06/20/03 1136 C'UNN- EDWARCS CORFORA'=%* 9252 _1362:. 1101 08 /20/)3 119(: DJNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 3252 :13622 '1C' -,8/20/C3 '796 DUNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 1_3622 110' 68/2C/03 1196 DUNN - EDWARDS CORPORAT :CN 92b2 113522 1 -01 08/20/03 1196 D::NN - EDWARDS CCINPCRATTON 9252 113522 1' l 08/20/01 1196 DUNN EDWARDS COR ?ORATION 930 -. '13622 '..101 ,-8/20/03 .'96 DUN`: - EDWARDS CORPORATION 9252 113G22 '1C' ^8/2C/03 1196 T%UNN- EDWARDS CORFORA'1''CN 9232 1133622 1.I0i 06/20/03 1196 D:;NN- EL`WAR-)S C0R ?CRATION 925: TO-A', CHECK 1'3623 i1C' 05 /2G /O3 3540 ECOLCGY CONS';k::C -'TON, INC 9630 113524 1'01 C8/20/ ,-3 1216 EZ2 NETWORK INC 9202 113625 "101 08 /2C /0, 1219 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 9230 113626 1'0' 08/20/,3 1.22:1 FENCE FACTORY RENTALS 9252 .:3627 '121 08 /20/03 2534 F'E.CH=T, ERIC 9244 112628 110' 09 /2C/03 1222 ?IFT- AVENUE CLEANERS 9020 :13629 11:11 C8/20/03 -244 GI:,D= T, KdNNFTh 9225 3629 -101 08 /2C/03 1244 CILBERT, KENNETH 9224 TOTAL CHE, -< '13630 1101 C8/20/03 3667 CU7T3RREZ, TRACY 38G5 1'363' '101 09/2C/03 3306 -q(- ^ ;AN, BARRY K. 9221 .13632 11:) )8/20/03 1447 IXAGISTICS 1N- F.RNATIONAL, 9202 113633 1 -0- 33 /2C /C3 2993 INDJS -IN'AL SERVICE C3N7ER 925' _:3634 101 06 /20/03 1311 JCH \SON, K -M 9'60 113634 1'OI 09/20/C3 1311 JOHNSON, KIN 9160 TOTAL CHECK .35 'LO1 08/2;/03 1329 T,A-NCIS, . A )Or,- 1133636 ,1101 08/20/03 i44C LAJLE7IA, -)AVID 9001 11307 { i'C" 08 /2C /C3 325) LAW!NENCE, K31:H 9244 _-3538 :101 08 / 20/03 34'0 MARTINET. ARCaTTFCTS, INC. 9601 1'36 ?8 �. ' '.0' 08 /2C /03 3410 MARTINEZ ARC!!IT3C'1'S, TN(-.. 9GO- TOTAL CHECK V PAC= NUN -FOR: 3 V3NCHK2'_ AC(70: ;NTINC- FERI.D: 2/03 -- --- DESCRIPT:CN" - - -- AMO ';NT PW PAINT SUPPL-LS 83•)2 CvoS CYN TAINT 23.39 CNiPS PAINT SUP ?L, -=S 23.39 PA1N'l S::'PLIES POINDF.XTER FAINT SUPP 23.39 CCLLliCF. VIEW SJFFL_E:S 23.39 PCH 3:ILL FAINT SUPPLI 23.39 GLENWOOD PRK PAIN: S'U 15.9'- .R PRK PAIN:' SJPFL:ES 15.90 PCH is �T,T FAINT SUPP:..1 :.5.90 XT,N MEACOY.S PATN'1 SJP 15.9,- CCL:..FGE VIEW PAINT SJ 111.90 PAIN, SUPPI. TFS 72.04 CAMPUS CYN PA_N'1' SJPP 15.9_ CAMPUS PRK FA.IN7 SUP? 15.91 POINCEXTE:N PATNT SUPP 15.31 574.86 7 /0.3AVCP PIJ�SE _T 467,252.94 03/04 MPK FL' JSL SRV 39.55 SC7_EPAN -3;V &S 11.94 8 /03MO3ILEHCYEPRK FEN -,7,21 ,'BL OFFiCIAT, 45.C3 CEO JN-F, ^,RM CLEANINC 5.95 (',3 AFWA CONF M -A'.S 150.00 033 AT ".4A CONF MILaACJ -24.36 274.36 REF'JN') -TEEN TRAY:.: 4'' • 00 7 /03ROTARY CI,:;B JUFS 70.00 SAX Y:AC:!INL TONFR CAR 424.53 TRAILER E-ECTRICAL RE 7*1•16 DCB OBLD_F.NCE INSTRUC 540.0^ TNS' :RANG°_ -JOG OR=D -EN - 172.5) 357.5C MTG COMPENSA'1''0\ 100.':;^ 7/1 MTG COXPFNSATION 1 00.00 JE;, :FF:CIAL, 45.00 PW /PRKS YARL' DFSTGN 720.CC PW /PRKS YARD DESIGN 1,680.00 2,4:;;;.00 FENTAMATiOX - F :1ND ACCCUN_NC DATE: CA 113;.'3 CITY 01 MCORPARK, CA T'- 15 53.99 CHFCK REGISTER PUN.; - '_OJO - GENERAL TOTAL C:I=::K CHECK NUMBER CASH ACC'1 "?ATF ISSUED - -. --------- VENDCk------ - - - - -- ACC° 1136:19 1_10- 08 /20 /C3 18,1 MCMASTLt, SHAWN 9244 1136L0 1 -01 O8/20/J3 -.365 X,:MAS-FR-CARR SUPP-1' 9208 '_1364C .1C- 08/20/03 1365 MCMASTLR -CARR SUPPLY 97CA TOTAL CHECK -10- C8 /20/C3 '_1.35'11 -1C- 08/20/03 2781 MTSAC 922 1 13642 li0_ 08 /2n /C3 1380 MOORS RECREATTON & PARK E 9205 113632 -1C- 09/2:/03 1360 MCJRE RF.CREATICN & PARK E 3205 _=3642 1_01 08/20/',3 1_390 MOCRE R3CREA'i:ON & PARK E 9205 11361.2 1 -01 08/20/C3 1.380 Y,:;O:RE RFCR EAT ION & PARK E 92:;5 113642 _1C.:. 08/20/03 1380 MOORE REC3:A' :ICV & PARK E 9205 _ -3642 i101 08/20/03 1380 MOCRE R= CREATION & PAR< E 9205 1:3642 1 -01 - 8/20/:3 1380 YOORE RECREATION & PARK E 92C5 11'x642 110: 09/20/033 1380 MCORF. RECREA -ICN & PARK E 9265 -13642 :_101 08/2C/03 1383 MOCRE RECREATION & PARK L 9205 ,' -3522 1'01 C8 /20/C3 -380 MOORE RECREATION & PARK E 92C5 113542 1101_ 39/20/03 1380 MOORE PFCR2A 1C`7 & PA -7K E 9205 -13642 -10- 08/22/03 1380 MOCRE RECREATTON & PARK L 9225 TOTAL CHECK 113643 '1G- 08/20/03 1387 MOORPARK FEED & SJPFLY 92C4 113644 liJl :8/20/03 2189 MCRGENSIERN, ROBERT PEI'E:R 9208 - '.3645 1'U1 02/20/ 3 3573 KATIV L•NGTNEERING, INC. 9640 113645 1.01 08/20/03 3573 NAT:V ENGIilEEk -NG, INC. 9640 '.CTAT. CHECK 113645 1101 08/20/03 345" ON -STTE HEALTH SCRFF %ING, 91C2 I "30.47 1 -C1 09/20%03 .3G70 PACT=. COAST 3USTNFSS TI 9220 -.3648 :10- C8 /2G /J3 1446 PiONF.F.R OFFICE MAC'r.TNES 92DJ -136:9 "10- J8 /20/03 -451 T'OSTNET AND COMY'JN --CA -ION 9'03 1 -3649 1 -U1 03/20/03 145- PCS'iNFT AND COMMUNICATTOX 92C7: 11 649 7101 OR/20/03 1451 POSTN3T A \;7 C0Kv:UNICA -lON 9232 9001 9251 925- 925- 92C1 9205 9205 PAG= N; :143ER: 4 VENCHK21 AC"OTINT-.NG FdRTOD: 2/03 - ----- DESCRIP'1'ON------- 8 /:7CMP h:PK E:' /FNT mid KEY CAE -N37 AIk PUMP C3 MEY3ERSHIP DUES PCH HTT.1, PRK BEL', Sn_ MTN MEADOW'S EF.1 T SWIN COMM. CTR BELT SWING -TERRA REJALIA. BELT SW AVCP BF ",T SWING CNTRY TRAIL B=T," SWIN GLEN'.4OGD BEL.- SWING ?'.:LLER 3EL: .SWING CAMPUS BELT SWING CA,,YPUS CYN BE:,T SWING COLLEGE VIEW RFLT SWI POIND=XTER BELT SWT \G VECTCR TAY MASH C'EL,T.'H('NF CI:ARCCR,CAS F:.TNN AVE & S "RTX:, -LINN AVE & SPRING CAROT1Lt AR "VERY SCREEN 03/C4 S;RSCRIPTION FRINTF :2 MATNTENlNCF. AGRF' DOWN MF.v )RY LANE CC: 'T N BURNS NAME RADC- 8 /C3SR NEWSLF.T'1'HR PRI 1/1 N-TG COXPLNSATION PD RADAk R=CERTI:'Y REPLACE CABLE ASSEMBL PD RADAR MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SUP )LIES CITY CCUNCTT. SUPPLIES //3 EVENT SUPPI,-FS 916 "3 8/03 SR 3- DAY -'VFNT AMOUNT ?2`:.GO 6F. -4 61.19 227.33 180.01) 14.66 '4.66 14.05 14.G5 -4.66 14.G5 14.65 -4.65 14.66 -4.66 14.66 14 .66 175.88 i.3-- 21.4` 66,85C.n0 66,85J.00 - 33,70 .00 GOO CIO 44.99 1,5 -5.00 646.72 25.7E 46J.10 . ,133.58 10 -.00 62.06 102.22 164.22 355.CC 6n. ^2 31.82 29.01 6C.83 85.00 TOTAL C:I=::K -13650 -10- 09 /20 /C3 3441 FOZZA, SC'CTT 1.1365- 11 -1 08/2 " /03 1475 R.H.F., INC -13651 -'_0- :?8/20/ 03 1475 R.E.F., TN -.. TOTAI, CAECK 1 13652 -10- C8 /20/C3 3629 RADAR SHOP, THE ` ^.K - 13613 i> 110: 09/2C/J3 :476 RADIO SPA. CORPr)RA'1'ION 1.1654 ( % 11;1 06/20/03 3022 RA',PHS GROCERY COMPANY 1 -364 -101 0.°. /2C /C3 3 :'22 RALPS GROCERY CCY.PAKY TOTAL CH3C'K � a 1i36�5 -101 08/20/03 1479 RAY, DAN 9001 9251 925- 925- 92C1 9205 9205 PAG= N; :143ER: 4 VENCHK21 AC"OTINT-.NG FdRTOD: 2/03 - ----- DESCRIP'1'ON------- 8 /:7CMP h:PK E:' /FNT mid KEY CAE -N37 AIk PUMP C3 MEY3ERSHIP DUES PCH HTT.1, PRK BEL', Sn_ MTN MEADOW'S EF.1 T SWIN COMM. CTR BELT SWING -TERRA REJALIA. BELT SW AVCP BF ",T SWING CNTRY TRAIL B=T," SWIN GLEN'.4OGD BEL.- SWING ?'.:LLER 3EL: .SWING CAMPUS BELT SWING CA,,YPUS CYN BE:,T SWING COLLEGE VIEW RFLT SWI POIND=XTER BELT SWT \G VECTCR TAY MASH C'EL,T.'H('NF CI:ARCCR,CAS F:.TNN AVE & S "RTX:, -LINN AVE & SPRING CAROT1Lt AR "VERY SCREEN 03/C4 S;RSCRIPTION FRINTF :2 MATNTENlNCF. AGRF' DOWN MF.v )RY LANE CC: 'T N BURNS NAME RADC- 8 /C3SR NEWSLF.T'1'HR PRI 1/1 N-TG COXPLNSATION PD RADAk R=CERTI:'Y REPLACE CABLE ASSEMBL PD RADAR MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SUP )LIES CITY CCUNCTT. SUPPLIES //3 EVENT SUPPI,-FS 916 "3 8/03 SR 3- DAY -'VFNT AMOUNT ?2`:.GO 6F. -4 61.19 227.33 180.01) 14.66 '4.66 14.05 14.G5 -4.66 14.G5 14.65 -4.65 14.66 -4.66 14.66 14 .66 175.88 i.3-- 21.4` 66,85C.n0 66,85J.00 - 33,70 .00 GOO CIO 44.99 1,5 -5.00 646.72 25.7E 46J.10 . ,133.58 10 -.00 62.06 102.22 164.22 355.CC 6n. ^2 31.82 29.01 6C.83 85.00 ?ENTA.MATTOS - FJNC ACCJUNTING DATE: JY /13 /3 '3 TIME: 15:53:29 7U;:C - 1000 - GENERAL FJND CH=:CK NUMzcEk CASH ACC.- DATE 1SSCFD ----- - - - - -- 113656 RICEIAZDS, VT(-.KY 1101 C9/20/03 " -.3657 ROLLER COM= 1131 GP /20/03 113658 ROLL:NS CONSULTI \G, INC. 110: C5/20/J3 113658 ROLLINS CC\SULT:NG, INC. 1101 08/22/03 1994 ROTARY C:,: ;B OF MOORPARK T07A1 C:I2CK 111659 RRM D=S:GN GROUP :.10' C5/20/ ,13 ' -13660 RUIZ F.KG:XEEZING, :NC. 1:a1 08/20/03 1:366- RU-7 ENGINEER :NC -, INC. 1101 CS /2J /C2 11365= SALCYON P1.JXBING -.'.Oi 08/20/03 3653 SALOMON ?:,UMBLNG '1'01A: C47CK -3562 9331 110' 08 /2J /C3 11,662 1616 L10_ C8/20/03 '_616 VFNTJRA COCN'lY SFFRIFF'S TOTA -- CH":CK ::3663 9118 :10- C9/2J/03 11.3664 1f -15 11,11 C•8/20/03 117GG5 VEN:URA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 1-01. C8/20/03 1136'6 -10: ;8/2J/03 11366/ 11,11 09/20/03 1116F8 ] - -01 C8120103 LL3G69 1'-OJ 38/23/03 1136G9 1131 .R/20/03 113610 1101 `8/20/J3 1357-. 1161 18/20/0- 113;72 11 101 09/20/C3 113673 1101 081:0103 113073 11 ,1i O8/20/C3 TCTAL CH-:K 113671. 11 ,11 08/20/C3 113075 1101 •8/20/:3 113675 110'_ 38/20/03 113675 l,s 110L 08/22/0:-5 113075 1101 08/20/03 1126,13 .� 11:1 08/20/03 113675 } :101 J8/2C/0.3 113675 { 1 :.01 08/20/:;3 CITY OF MOORnARK, CA C-ECK REGIS'.ER VENDOR-- -- -- -- - --- ACCT -- ----- CCSCRL ?7TON------- 3669 RICEIAZDS, VT(-.KY 3862 RE_ UND -VOCAL TEC'HNTQU 1655 ROLLER COM= 9244 7/25 CAM? MFK :R1P 3200 ROLL:NS CONSULTI \G, INC. 9:03 CdMO1 -T °ION M07 SRVCS 3200 ROLLINS CC\SULT:NG, INC. 96SJ FD SRVC CTR CONSTRUCT 1994 ROTARY C:,: ;B OF MOORPARK 9221 7 /03CAPT D:AZ D::=.S 1,192 RRM D=S:GN GROUP 9601 ARROYO SIMI '13A -:. STU 3574 RUIZ F.KG:XEEZING, :NC. 9640 03 OVERLAY PROTECT 3574 RU-7 ENGINEER :NC -, INC. 9G4C 03 OVERLAY ?RCJFCT 3653 SALCYON P1.JXBING 9252 661M7< AV WA=*.iEATFR 3653 SALOMON ?:,UMBLNG 9252 661 M ?K AVF ?LUX2IKG 3270 SCAN / \A1'OA C/O CITY OF '1'J 9221 3668 SCAROCK, PATRICIA .1862 :.364 SIG\A.CRF. SIGNS, INC. 9613 :527 SMART & FINAL 9244 1534 SOU'7HSRK CAI,1FORN -A 9221 1656 ':AZGET 924: 336: TAYLOR, JANE RJT:! 9102 3361 TAYLOR, :ANz: RCTH 9 ".02 2392 TE:,F.COKv :UN:CA: TONS XAINAGE 9102 159" TRC ?H:�-S ETC 9240 1593 'j. S. POSTMASTER 923'_ -599 UNIVERSAL REPZOCkAPHICS, 9232 1599 :; \:VERSAT REFROG -AP =ICS, 9232 2283 VENCC WESTERN, :NC. 9331 16:G VEN`CRA COUNTY SHERTFF'S 9117 1616 V3\7UZA CCJN7Y SFIERiF"S 925. '_616 VFNTJRA COCN'lY SFFRIFF'S ,L:7 15:6 VEN:CRA COUNTY SH'E <:FF'S 9118 1616 VENTURA CCJN,Y S:IERIFF'S 9117 1f -15 VFNTJRA COUNTY SHFRIFF'S 91:'1 - .6,6 VEN:URA COUNTY SHERIFF'S 9117 03 /04 ME?:BCRSH:? JUF.S R 3PU\D -FLAG FOC'I2Al -i., CJi,I.=GEVW 'rK MJNUM=V7 CAMP M ?Y. S:;PPLIFS 03 /C4Y M3�R.SHIP CULS CAMP VPK SUP ?L:ES / /C3STRENGTH ':RA-NIIdG 7 /033EG STRENG711 CABLE ':'V -,ONSJLTAN= `, ?K I -D ?LAQJ3 ENGRAVT 9/03 SR C'7R NE'WS:.ETTE TRAFFIC SIGNAL :NTERC ZONTNG ;':AF CJP1=.S 7/03 712 LAi\DSCAPF 7 /03TRAFF:C SRVCS 7 /03VE :;ICLC CHARGES 7 /03SFEC FN!F D37AII. 7 / ^3OVERT:ME -RF.G & CT 7 /03COMM SRVCS 7 /03DARE OFFIC=R 5TH 7/C3115RC Or 10ER PAGE NUMR'R: S V=NC -K2L ACCOUNTING PER:CU: 2/03 AMCJNT 41.,10 384.30 2,50;.00 11,945.00 14,445.',0 '10.00 17, 215.02 540,67F.94 145,99:.36 686,SG8.30 425.00 75.00 500.00 75. ,1J 90.00 2,347.81 _8'.31 2,857.00 3.64 27.15 39.75 560.00 60.2-^ 3JU. 8.1-4 8.04 16.09 3,89'_.91 26,097,58 13,483.24 10,764.53-5 11,326.28 10,594.08 9, 627.67 9,62/.67 PENTAXA7TCN - FUNC ACCOUNTING JA:F: 06/13/C3 Cl'fY OF 40CRPARK, CA -IML: 15:53:29 C!!Z= RLGTS7ER FUND - 1000 FUN-, C!:ECK NUMBER CAS-. ACC1' DATE ISSUED ------ -- - -- VENDOR - - - - -- ----- ACCT ------- D-scrilli.10N ------ 113675 1101 08/2-/03 VENTURA CC'-;NTY SHFRTF7'S 91-17 7/02INVZSTlSATTVE SRV --l--1 08/20/03 1616 VE.Nl'-*RA -O!;NTY S:!ER.-FF'S 9:17 7/03PAT-RCL SRVCS -'-TAL CHECK 1101 3343 VES'1U!O, A\GELI-.A D. 9160 TENN:S 7N'STRJCTION -.367'7 02/2C/03 1621 VIDFOYAX ?RODUCTIONS 9102 -1/3 V=EO TAPING C8/20/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRO-)*,J('.7IONS 9102 7/03VIDEO PROD/GPAPH1 IOTAL : --CY 113678 i101 O8 /20/03 1048 WEST GROUP 5220 -,A COD--S & COURT RULE 1-,3679 i-J)l (8/20/03 --635 WESTERN OIL, SPR*--'A-)T4(, SER 931C -ACK COAT A/C -ATCH--S 113680 1111) 1 OR/20/03 1636 W!1ITAKER T LA R D 4.- A-:4 F , INC. 9303 PW SUPPL:--S ',b/20/C3 i636 'd*.! I PAKER HARDWARE, :NC 9103 PW SUPPI.TES 3C50 _ ..G1 ',8/20/03 - - C3E W11:7AKER ILARDW ARF, INC 9301 \* nA:-. SUPPL S i- 113680 1-01 08/2C/03 1636 -,+HilAKF.R 3ARDWARE, 11\C: 9301 PAINT SUPPL:ES 1136E10 8/20/03 '_536 'di:!TAKE.Z HARDWARE, =NC 9310 PW CONC.Z-6..F, Stlr?i.-•s --369" 'lei C8 /21/C3 1636 WH--AKER HARCWAR-, INC 9204 AN-VAL CONTROL li3680 08/2C/'03 1636 WIIITAKER *4ARDWARE, INC: 9110 PW CCNCRFT7- SUPP:,IFS 3680 liul 08/20/03 1636 W*!ITAKER 1:ARDWARL, -NC 9205 F)CST X--X, ilARDWAR" 36S-1 - 38/20/C3 62( WHI.'AK7R HARCWARZ, INC 920,8 �W SUP71T.-E-S 1.680 -'01 08/2C/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, 1NC 9301 PAINT SUPFLTFS 1136PO 1'-J1 08/20/03 1636 W`TTAKER FARDWARE, INC 9208 PW STjsP:1IES 113680 1 10- t,;8/20/C3 =636 Wli:-AKE2 HARCWARF, INC 9301 '-A:N'l SJPIL-ES —368- -lei 08/20/03 1636 WHI':AK-R HARDWARE, INC 9208 PW SY.ALL "'COTS 11368C, 01 08/20/^l 1636 t4HITAKER HARDWARE, -NC 9310 CONC. -�- TE SUP -ES 113680 1- -01 09/20/03 '636 W:=AKLk HARTWARE-, INC 9208 POST MIX -O.AL CHECK 113681 1101 08/20/`3 2643 WOLCO )203 6/15-7/191"g BLDG 1-13681 I-_oi 08/20/n3 2843 92C3 Co— MACI:!'\*E SUPPT•T75; 1368' lic- 36/20/03 2841 WCLCO 9203 6/17-7/11C0 ?Y AREA 1:3r8- -101 39/2�V03 2843 WOLCO 9203 6/17-7/17ANNEX CC?IES 113681 1101 J8/20/03 2513 WOLICO 923 E,/-/ 7/17POSTAGE Ak--'A T:D-A1. CHECK 10:'AL FUND -('TAL R--POR- PAGE NUMBER: VENC::.',<2 I ACC:DJN7ING PEaICD: 2/03 AXJUNT 33, 001 .31 12 , oc 0. E 6 3u5,571.C9 135.00 875. ur 2,922.00 3, 7 97. CO :68.39 12.19 D.58 8.47 5.89 41.70 2.:3 4 .2 1 11.23 4.CD 19.27 -4.97 16,.92 8.30 4.05 10.'_4 :63.`:2 10.05 565.41 107.17 :19.1-5 _29.64 991.42 1,677,221.0- 677,22!.U' 2ENTA'KATTCN dUND ACCOUNI "TNG ?AGE NUMBER: 1 -)APE: ::9/'_3/03 C =TY OF M(-C3?A.RR, CA VENcp.x21 TIME: 15:53:34 CHEC.< RFG1S'.ER - FUND TOTALS AC'C'OUNTING ?ERT_OD: 2/C3 FUND FUND TITLE AA.C, ;NT OlOJ INTERNAL SERVT(--?S !U \D 3,775.05 10 -0 GFNERAL FUND "321,333.03 211JC TRAFF_C SAFETY 7UND 5.53 2100 CCVNUN1'1'Y WICE 2200 COMMUNITY D- VF',O -,McNI' 1,20F..97 2308 AD 84 2 ZONE J 180.110 23.2 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1.2 3,891.91 2400 PARK MAINIENA. \OE DISTRICT 5,546.11 250' _OS ANGELES A.O.C. 56,95C.00 260.5 LOCAL TRANSFOR':A'1'ION 8A 540,676.91- 2604 TFA 21 bEDERAL GRANTS :/,2:5.02 2605 GAS TAY 2,273.7,7 2609 OTH -R Si /kEDERAL GRANTS 16,SS /.15 2610 ',RAFFIC CONGES710N R- '.TF'r 145,991.36 2901 MRA L.. ^,Lv /MO-) INC HOUSE /INC 26.76 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR 6 .^,TIER '/0,0:8.7: 2904 2001 3OND (.APTTA" IMP 1,680.0:1 4002 PCI,IC'E FACILITIES FUND 11,345.;;0 6950 ACM:NISTRATIVF TFRMI.S 792.00 TOTAL, R=POR— 1 , 6'7'/, 221.01 !r j ITEM 10 --D . of ��ao -aoo3 ,.c- - -ON:d ,rte MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Barry Hogan, Community Development Direct0 Prepared by: Joseph F. Fiss, Principal P n er Date: July 23, 2003 (CC Meeting of 08/20/03) Subject: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04, a Request to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (in Addition to Beer and Wine) in Conjunction with Food Service at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse, 11800 Championship Drive, on the Application of Moorpark Country Club (Toll Brothers, Inc.) BACKGROUND The public hearing for this Conditional Use Permit was opened and closed on July 2, 2003. The City Council continued consideration of this application to the August 20, 2003, meeting in order for the applicant and staff to clarify the Conditions of Approval. Specifically, the applicant wanted to clarify Condition Nos. 4 and 5 regarding the events for which alcohol was approved by this Conditional Use Permit and when an event would require a Temporary Use Permit for alcohol. City Council had already directed staff to modify the serving hours in Condition No. 12. Staff has met with the applicant several times and is satisfied that the revised conditions, as presented, provide sufficiently for the public health, safety and welfare while not adversely affecting the operation of the facility. On July 24, 2003, Staff discussed these conditions with the Development Review Committee; a recently formed committee made up of staff from the City and other affected agencies to discuss upcoming projects and issues of concern. No concerns were raised at that meeting. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2003 \04 Moorpark CC (Toll)\Agenda Reports \CC 030820 stf rpt.doc Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Meeting Page No. 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2003- conditionally approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04. Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolution with Findings and Conditions of Approval. 2. July 2, 2003, City Council Agenda Report (without Resolution). RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -04, TO ALLOW THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH FOOD SERVICE AT THE MOORPARK COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE AND CLUBHOUSE AT 11800 CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE, AND RESCINDING ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT NO. 2002 -34, ON THE APPLICATION OF TOLL BROTHERS, INC. ON BEHALF OF MOORPARK COUNTRY CLUB (APN 500- 0 -220- 010) WHEREAS, on at a duly notices public hearing July 2, 2003, and on the August 20, 2003 Consent Calendar, the City Council considered Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2003 -04, to allow the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with food service at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse, 11800 Championship Drive, on the application of Toll Brothers, Inc. on behalf of Moorpark Country Club (APN 500- 0 -220- 010); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 2, 2003, the City Council conducted a public hearing, received public testimony, closed the public hearing, and continued the item to the August 20, 2003, City Council meeting Consent Calendar to resolve final wording relative to the conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and public testimony has reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA , pursuant to Section 15301 as a Class (1) exemption for the continuing use of existing facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and of the City CC ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 2 Municipal Code in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course, a use consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. B. The Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the character of surrounding development in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. C. The Conditional Use Permit would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. D. The Conditional Use Permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. E. The conditionally permitted use is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. F. The use will not result in an over concentration in the area of establishments selling alcoholic beverages. The proposal is not creating a new establishment, merely modifying the category of allowable alcohol sales at an existing establishment. G. The use will serve a public convenience in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. H. The use will not create the need for increased police services in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. I. The requested use at the proposed location will not adversely affect the economic welfare of the community; and J. The exterior appearance of the structure will not be inconsistent with the external appearance of commercial structures already constructed or under construction on surrounding properties, or within the immediate neighborhood so as to cause blight, deterioration or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04 subject to the special and S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2003 \04 Moorpark CC (Toll) \Resolutions \CC Reso Revised.doc i Resolution No. 2003 - Page 3 standard conditions of approval in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. RESCISSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT: Administrative Permit No. 2002 -34 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A: Special and Standard Conditions of Approval S: \Corrmunity Development \DEV P?TTS \C U P \2003 \04 Moorpark CC (Toll) \Resolutions \CC Reso Revised.doc GI Resolution No. 2003 - Page 4 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -04 PLEASE CONTACT THE COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the plans presented in conjunction with the application for Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04, except any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein. 2. All necessary permits shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department and all construction shall be in compliance with the Moorpark Building Code and all other applicable regulations. 3. Approval of a Zoning Clearance shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. All other permit and fee requirements must be met. 4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit is for alcoholic beverage sales for golf- related events, social, military, educational, religious or fraternal events, holiday brunches, lunches or dinners, or events held by the City of Moorpark, Moorpark Unified School District, or local based non - profit groups. Any recurring use other than those uses listed above shall require approval of a separate Conditional Use Permit. Entertainment is not approved as part of this Conditional Use Permit. Entertainment (whether or not an admission fee is collected) shall include, but not be limited to live music, comedy review, stage shows, movies, satellite or pay per view TV or other uses determined to be entertainment by the Community Development Director. 5. For indoor or outdoor events other than those listed in condition 4 above, where three hundred (300) or more people are planned or expected, the applicant shall apply for and secure a Temporary Use Permit from the Community Development Department. Such application shall be made at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the commencement of the indoor or outdoor event. As part of the Conditions of Approval, the Community Development Director may require, based upon the scope and size of the event, security guards, traffic control, valet parking and other measures to assure that the event does not disrupt the neighborhood and surrounding area. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2003 \04 Moorpark CC (Toll) \Resolutions \CC Reso Revisec.doc (, Resolution No. 2003 - Page 5 6. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon the continued operation of at least an 18 -hole golf course, consistent with CUP 1994 -01. Cessation of the golf use will terminate the approval of alcoholic sales. 7. The applicant shall reimburse the City of Moorpark for any additional police or other costs incurred by the City as a result of operations approved by this Conditional Use Permit, including fifteen (150) percent overhead on any such services. 8. No person under the age of eighteen (18) shall serve or package alcoholic beverages. 9. All exterior areas of the site, including parking areas under use by the facility, shall be maintained free of litter and debris at all times. 10. Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04 may be revoked or its use suspended by the City, if any of the causes listed in Section 17.44.080.B of the Zoning Code are found to apply, including if the use for which the permit was granted has not been exercised for at least twelve (12) consecutive months, has ceased to exist, or has been abandoned. The discontinuance for a period of one hundred eighty (180) or more days of a nonconforming use or a change of nonconforming use to a conforming use constitutes abandonment and termination of the nonconforming status of the use. 11. The City of Moorpark reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke for cause this conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 17.44 of the Moorpark Municipal Code or as may be amended in the future. 12. Sales, service or consumption of alcoholic beverages allowed by this Conditional Use Permit shall be permitted only between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. For events on the golf course, such as golf tournaments and golf related games sales, service or consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 8 P.M. 13. The facility shall at all times maintain records which reflect separately the gross sale of food and the gross sales of alcoholic beverages of the business. Said records shall be kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the Moorpark Police Department upon demand. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2003 \04 Moorpark CC (Toll) \Resolutions \CC Reso Revised.doc Resolution No. 2003 - Page 6 14. Areas inside the establishment open to customers shall be illuminated sufficiently to allow the identification of persons. 15. The applicant or his /her designee shall be responsible to police the exterior of the business to assure that no alcoholic beverages are consumed within the parking lot. The applicant shall not permit any loitering in the parking lot or in areas adjacent to the facility. 16. No exterior advertising of promoting or indicating the beverages. Interior displays are clearly visible to the violation of this condition. ny kind or type is allowed availability of alcoholic of alcoholic beverages that exterior shall constitute a 17. The permittee must correct any safety or security problem within thirty (30) days upon written notice of such a problem from the Moorpark Police Department. 18. Any and all employees directly involved or supervising the sale /service of alcoholic beverages shall provide evidence and the business shall maintain records that employees have: a. Received training from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control "Leadership and Education in Alcohol and Drugs" LEAD program in the form of an ABC issued certificate. b. The Owner /Manager shall confirm with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control within 15 days of hire any new employee has been scheduled with the local (Santa Barbara ABC office) to attend the LEAD program course. Alternatively, this course attendance requirement may be met through a Lead certified agency or company approved by the State of California. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C U P \2003 \09 Moorpark CC (Toll) \Resolutions \CC Reso Revised.doc f MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Barry Hogan, Community Development Director Prepared by: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager Date: June 19, 2003 (CC Meeting of 07/02/03) Subject: Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04, a Request to Allow the Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (in Addition to Beer and Wine) in Conjunction with Food Service at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse, 11800 Championship Drive, on the Application of Moorpark Country Club (Toll Brothers, Inc.) BACKGROUND On November 22, 2002, the Community Development Director approved an Administrative Permit for beer and wine to be served at the Moorpark Country Club Golf Course and Clubhouse. The Clubhouse is not open yet, but is expected to open by Labor Day this year. At the present time, the Country Club is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to also sell alcoholic beverages in addition to beer and wine. DISCUSSION Project Setting Existina Site Conditions: The clubhouse, currently under construction, will include a full- service restaurant with outdoor dining, a banquet hall, a bar, a wedding garden with a gazebo, and a service yard. The golf course surrounds the clubhouse on three sides. Previous Applications: Administrative Permit No. 2002 -34 was approved on November 22, 2002, by the Community Development Director to allow the on -site sale and consumption of beer and wine. CC ATTACHMENT 2 Honorable City Council July 2, 2003 Meeting Page No. 2 GENERAL PLAN /ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site Open Space 2 Open Space Clubhouse and Golf Course North County: Open County Open Agricultural and - Space and Ag - Space and Ag _ -- - - - - - -- rural residential - - - - -- Open Space 2 Open Space South and Rural and Rural Open space and Low Resid. Exclusive rural residential - Medium Low ----------- Residential - - - - - -- Residences and East Residential Planned vacant land - Development - - - - - - - -- - Medium Low Residential Residences and West Residential Planned vacant land Development General Plan and Zoning Consistency: The OS -2 land use designation in the General Plan is intended to identify permanent open space areas which function to preserve visual resources and natural areas, buffer communities, and provide relief from noise and crowding of urban development. The golf course is consistent with this designation. Golf courses and related facilities are a conditionally - permitted use in the OS Zone. ANALYSTS Issues Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified control of the service of alcoholic beverages as the primary issue for City Council consideration in their review of the Conditional Use Permit Application. This Conditional Use Permit would expand the approval for beer and wine under the existing Administrative Permit to allow the sale for on -site consumption of other alcoholic beverages. No floor plan modifications are proposed as part of this Conditional Use Permit. The same conditions applied to the Administrative Permit would apply to the Conditional Use Permit. Senior Deputy Ed Tumbleson of the Police Department has indicated that with these conditions, the Police Department would have no further concerns. The applicant is concurrently processing an application with the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for full alcohol service. Honorable City Council July 2, 2003 Meeting Page No. 3 Findings A. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and of the City Municipal Code in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course, a use consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. B. The Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the character of surrounding development in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. C. The Conditional Use Permit would not be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. D. The Conditional Use Permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. E. The conditionally permitted use is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. F. The use will not result in an over concentration in the area of establishments selling alcoholic beverages. The proposal is not creating a new establishment, merely modifying the category of allowable alcohol sales at an existing establishment. G. The use will serve a public convenience in that the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption is an ancillary use to the Golf Course. H. The use will not create the need for increased police services in that conditions are required to ensure proper control of the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -site consumption. I. The requested use at the proposed location will not adversely affect the economic welfare of the community; and J. The exterior appearance of the structure will not be inconsistent with the external appearance of commercial structures already constructed or under construction on Honorable City Council July 2, 2003 Meeting Page No. 4 surrounding properties, or within the immediate neighborhood so as to cause blight, deterioration or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. PROCESSING TIME LIMITS Time limits have been established for the processing of development projects under the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 4.5), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Title 7, Division 2), and the California Environmental Quality Act Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Division 13, and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3). Under the applicable provisions of these regulations, the following timelines have been established for action on this project: Date Application Deemed Complete: June 13, 2003 City Council Action Deadline: August 12, 2003 Upon agreement by the City and Applicant, one 90 -day extension can be granted to the date action must be taken on the application. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the City's environmental review procedures adopted by resolution, the Community Development Director determines the level of review necessary for a project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Some projects may be exempt from review based upon a specific category listed in CEQA. Other projects may be exempt under a general rule that environmental review is not necessary where it can be determined that there would be no possibility of significant effect upon the environment. A project which does not qualify for an exemption requires the preparation of an Initial Study to assess the level of potential environmental impacts. Based upon the results of an Initial Study, the Director may determine that a project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. In such a case, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared. For many projects, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will prove to be sufficient environmental documentation. If the Director determines that a project has the potential for significant adverse impacts and Honorable City Council July 2, 2003 Meeting Page No. 5 adequate mitigation can not be readily identified, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. The Director has reviewed this project and found it to be Categorically Exempt in accordance with Section 15301 (Class 1) of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines). No further environmental documentation is required. STAFF RECOIMKENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2003- conditionally approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04. Attachments: 1. Site Plan 2. Floor Plan 3. Draft City Council Resolution with Findings and Conditions of Approval /'N A. ITEM 10 . E. Moorpark City Council Agenda Report TO: The Honorable City Council ( 0 FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: August 4, 2003 (Council Meeting 8- 20 -03) SUBJECT: Flinn Avenue Driveway OVERVIEW This requests City Council approval of the concept plan [Exhibit 1] for the disposition of existing Flinn Avenue [herein "Old Flinn "], and the proposed design for the modifications to the existing street improvements on that street. DISCUSSION A. Background: 1. Construction Project: The City has awarded a contract for the construction of a new Flinn Avenue [herein "New Flinn "] to align with Second Street. That project is now under construction. The design for that project includes only minor modifications to Old Flinn and makes no commitments regarding the final disposition of that street. The purpose of this report is to seek direction on the final disposition of Old Flinn and to seek authorization to design and construct certain modifications to existing improvements on Old Flinn, based upon that direction. 2. Existing Utilities: There are a number of existing underground utilities in Old Flinn, including: Water, Sewer, Storm Drain, Gas and Telephone. When the plans for the New Flinn project were approved, the City Council was advised that those existing utilities would have to remain in place. Flinn Alley Flinn Avenue Driveway August 4, 2003 Page 2 B. Street Vacation If the City were to vacate Old Flinn, it retain utility easements for all of th utilities noted above. It is, therefore, Old Flinn not be vacated. C. Driveway Apron would be necessary to e existing underground recommended below that The design for the New Flinn project will close Old Flinn at Spring Road and install a driveway apron at the east end of Old Flinn to provide vehicular access to New Flinn at a point near the intersection of New Flinn and Minor Street [see Exhibit 1]. D. Conceptual Plan Attached as Exhibit 1, is a conceptual plan for the final disposition of Old Flinn. This plan calls for the reduction of the width of the street from forty -three feet (43') to thirty -two feet (321) in order to convert Old Flinn into an alley [herein "Alley "] to serve the properties located on the south side of Old Flinn. The cross - hatched area on Exhibit 1 will be added to the area to the north to be landscaped. E. Future Use / Ownership / Maintenance The Alley will be used as a driveway serving the properties on the south side of Old Flinn. It is anticipated that parking will continue to be permitted on the south side of the Alley only, between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The full width of the Old Flinn right -of -way will continue to show on the assessor maps. The Alley will continue to be publicly owned and maintained. F. Modifications If this concept plan is approved, plans will be prepared for the construction of certain modifications to the existing street improvements in Old Flinn, generally summarized as follows: 1. removal of existing pavement, curb and gutter along the side of Old Flinn [Note: a wider turn - around area will be provided at the west end of the Alley.]; 2. removal of existing improvements on the south side of Old Flinn near Minor Street; and 3. removal and /or modification of the storm drain inlet on the north side of Old Flinn, just east of Spring Road. I't is the intent of staff to attempt to have the contractor for the New Flinn project construct these modifications. Flinn Alley Flinn Avenue Driveway August 4, 2003 Page 3 G. Future Landscapin Attached as Exhibit 2, is a diagram showing the area south of New Flinn which will be landscaped as a part of the Police Station project. H. Notice Notice of these proposed changes was sent to the affected property owners, utilities, the Post Office, the County Assessor, and the Police Department, with instructions for interested or concerned parties to provide comment to the City. I. Resoonse: Scribner ProDert The City received only one response to the above Notice. In the attached letter (Exhibit 3) from Mr. Ken Scribner, the owner of the property at the southeast corner of Old Flinn and Spring Road, he states his preference that the City vacate the Old Flinn and sale him the north half of the street plus the remnant parcel north of Old Flinn. [Note: Vacating Old Flinn would cause the south half of Old Flinn to be relinquished to the properties along the south side of that street.] Mr. Scribner would like to acquire this property so that he can expand his business. As noted below it is the recommendation of staff that this option be denied. There are a number of problems associated with this option, including: • There are a number of underground utilities located in Old Flinn. Vacating the street would require extensive efforts to interface with each of those utilities to develop and record the necessary utility easements, with related conditions pertaining to limited future land use rights. • The restrictions which would be posed by these future (yet to be determined) utility easements would make it difficult to impossible to develop the property, as is the stated intent of Mr. Scribner. • It is anticipated that the added cost of developing and recording these easements would be a significant cost over and above the typical cost of a street vacation. • This option is inconsistent with the approved concept plan for the Police Services Center which along with enhanced landscaping on the remnant parcel created by the Flinn Avenue realignment is intended to serve as an entry statement on Spring Road approaching the City's historic downtown from the south. Flinn Alley Flinn Avenue Driveway August 4, 2003 Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the conceptual plan for converting Old Flinn into an Alley (driveway), authorize staff to design and construct the improvements required to implement this plan and direct staff to provide a response to Mr. Scribner respectfully declining his offer to acquire the property in question. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Alley Plan Exhibit 2: Landscaped Area Exhibit 3: Letter from Ken Scribner Flinn Alley Flinn Avenue Driveway August 4, 2003 Page 1 +'I i i i " VVIll F114t� �f,VtW 40 4?eV'A I �1 CI o NOTE: SEE .SHEET N0.5 FOR I I i {�pyp�pV7�15 16 - I STOR.N DRAIN DETAILS d I SEE DETAIL A HEREON I a wI SEE DETAIL 8 HEREON I W I BCR �/ Z o , SEE DETAIL C HEREON NI ^�II 528.1 a -1TT C. 5 �1/ ¢ (� I I — . ooh '4I/E 2. �, x'28.: — �I /d. If ��, LO a I n ti i i,'-j- -�_ \_� �F -`% __ -� I h �' / 1 I � �_� h�a�� � � hh7.1• � a ` Z iSTA 0 +85 NEW6 C`� �`� *0`O _ �� 14 b) I 5 +0 / LJ� > I I BCR LIGHT POLE - ? `II - T _ Q —�� - SFA 3 +34.78/ s- -- 527 60 T C. - �� f h� s28. 52L F S. LSTA 2 +14.47 - .` (. ' 526.93 FA tJ>kJ�i} / ` ' \ EXIST. EXCESS I/ Q AND BACK I CHAIN LINK � CE OF SIDEWALK ! • i + 9 (TO BE RE CA TED) "� -- - - - - - • •mss S7'A 4 +76.37 xi 61 !I i • �t `Lid �,. AT � MINOR ST. �IrT \� I a`' •• .•Qh� :. .�: LSTA 5 +00 NEW `r •. • as : •7 _ • • + •: • • •TF a� I • 3 LIGHT POLE L - - - • � � • �-= � • ' r- •�t'+SL�vE�� -+--r- a •• •� : • • xs ate: � �,; :., .. � � rS+ tL W •• a a • • • • • • • • f L A - - a - -a a • • • • • " Q ' "+ � l 3 t - S-T- A 4 +75.37 EXISTING i -EZ,, 2 r s .w SEWER MANHOLE 7� 0� LI ( V1�Q I r EXISTING OVERHEAD — 10, �' j ti` d -M ELECTRICAL LINE /� 70 Lt 0� (� 5 • ca i3 I I 1 F`1r�w IL EGEn1D I+ I pl I m i I . I 4WT,.99,lw Fuiurc L/5 I UI NOTE' Sr'F SHEET NO 5 FOR I im I g i J S'OFu DRAIN DETAILS � I 1 SEE DETAIL A HEREON I PI SEE DETAIL B HEREON Q 2- WI I SEE DETAIL C HEREON T RCR I a,' O j o — J1. 528 14 ! C 5 (n I — ii I I 27 4 7 F lL �b. 'A % 14 g / 9 \ Zi FLINN11 � qV a �° � oc>l of �1 -fi'�� Q-1 °� �a v 1 CIO o i n / — ti.l * �+ i / d- I �7 3 -- /ns�f \ 2 �4 / \�1�QI -5 W f 0 I .�\p� _ ? �A�� /`� z y /4+ 5 `� r +nn _ SAS � . SLA 3 +34.78 s �--= $ -- - - -- - I' I I � --= s 9 _ '`� _ �I �/1��_ - •S �` CAS �_ (528 52) F.S. h I 1 dtsb �— S1A 4 +76 37 AT MINOR I W NEW -- -- - -- 21' 5E*ra- S!A 4 +76.37 EXIST /NG --- -Ex:ST 2' GAS - - -- — - - ---- SE I —SL c� �, .,, • WER MANHOLE EXISTING G ✓E )1 fFAD -- ``- - rn ELECTRICAL LINE n 1 I K �. A KEN SCRIBNER Vu•z.rst 5. 2003 Ken C;ilhert. Director of Public Works of Moorpark ; r)Q Moorpark A, c Moorpark. CA 9.302 i RE: Flinn Avenue Alley / Drivewav Dear �!r f,�ti, b, � 3 As owners of the industrial building at 554 Flinn Avenue (on the corner of Spring Rd and the e.vistins Vhnn Avenue). we would like to go on record as opposing the current plan described in our letter of .luh 29. 200 ,. We favor the orwinal plan of the Crt' vacatmo the street n<?ht -of - \,a% and the possible sale b\ the Cite of the Remnant Parcel described in the N•lay 24, ?0O21 • Moorpark Citk Council Agenda Report that the Council approved June 5. 2002 We had hoped to have the opportunity to purchase the Remnant Parcel which would allow us the unique opportunity to expand our manufacturing building and it's parking. Also. the orlunnal City thinking of riot having to maintain the vacated Remnant Parcel still sounds like a viable reason for the City to consider selling it. Sinccrcl�. Ken Scribner Pti- Does the need still exist for the 13. ;79 9 SV of our western property adjacent to Spring Road to be sold to the City for the Spring Road widening'' Cc: Dennis Hotchkiss. Building Co -Owner Steven Kueny, City Manager Barry Hogan. Director of Community Development Glenn Hawks. Project Design Engineer Patrick Hunter. Mayor I M In M o. Moorpark City Council AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst DATE: August 4, 2003 (CC meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Rescinding an Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE Environmental for Regular Monthly Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Event Participation. DISCUSSION If approved, this action would rescind an Agreement the Council approved on January 16, 2002, between the City and MSE Environmental, Inc. (MSE). The Agreement was not executed because a separate agreement with MSE would have resulted in greater costs. Nevertheless, Moorpark residents and small businesses have and are allowed to attend the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) events at MSE in Camarillo with the City of Camarillo acting as the host jurisdiction under its contract with MSE. The City reimburses Camarillo for residential participation, and small businesses pay their own way. Staff anticipates bringing a formal agreement with the City of Camarillo to the Council for consideration in the near future. In the meantime, Moorpark residents may continue to attend the monthly events in Camarillo in addition to the monthly HHW events in Simi Valley. The Camarillo HHW events are held at the MSE facility at 880 West Verdulera Street in Camarillo on the second Friday and Saturday of each month. RECOMMENDATION Rescind the Agreement between the City of Moorpark, and MSE Environmental Inc. approved on January 16, 2002. ITEM 1 0 . G of - -- -- _ ....�.-v?,n03 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Man ger DATE: July 31, 2003 (CC Meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Waiver of for the Ventura Station 42 Project DISCUSSION Police Facility and Landscape Fees County Fire Protection District The Ventura County Fire Protection District began construction on the new Fire Station 42 on June 9, 2003. In the course of securing the permits for the project the District paid all applicable fees including the City's Police Facilities Fee ($3,860) and Landscaping Fee ($470.75). The District has asked that these two fees be waived which, if approved by the City Council, would amount to a refund to the District of a total of $ 4,330.75. The contractor has completed initial grading and forming for the floor slab and footings are being prepared. The target completion date for the project is May 26, 2004. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the fee waiver and refund the Police Facility Fee and Landscape Fee in the total amount of $ 4,330.75 to the Ventura County Fire Protection District. Attachment: Letter From Fire District VENTURA COUNTY . =IRE PROTECTION DISTRICT �`o ��yr Fir• oe, 165 Durfey Avenue Camarillo, CA 93010-8586 I (805) 389 -9710 FAX (805) 388 -4364 Mr. Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 RE: New Fire Station —Waiver of Fees Dear Hugh: BOB ROPER County Fire Chief June 12, 2003 The Fire District is requesting that the City of Moorpark waive its police facility and landscaping fees associated with the construction of the new fire station at High and Magnolia Street. Under city requirements, the police facility fee would be $3,860 and the landscaping fee for non - residential would be $470.75. We understand that the City Council must approve the waiver. In the meantime, the District has paid the fees so that the building permit could be issued. With the Council's approval we will work with staff on the refund. We appreciate the City's cooperation and assistance on this project and look forward to the dedication of the new station. Sincerely, Abbe' Berns Assistant Director Fire Services Deb," JUN 2003 Committed to Excellence ... Delivered with Pride Providing protection and preservation of life, property and environment to: The Cities of Camarillo, Moorpark, Ojai, Port Hueneme, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and the unincorporated areas of Ventura County. ITEM 10- g -a or'� -- - -- AL Moorpark City Council V7,A I a_- Agenda Report TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: August 7, 2003 (Council Meeting 8- 20 -03) SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition on Grimes Canyon Road and on Spring Road North of New Los Angeles Avenue This requests that the City Manager be authorized to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of- way and related property rights, required for the two (2) subject pending street improvement projects. DISCUSSION A. Grimes Canyon Road: Pursuant to the terms of Second Amendment to the Settlement Agreement between the City and Toll Brothers, the City agreed to acquire certain street rights -of -way on Grimes Canyon Road, required for the construction of certain roadway improvements. When those rights have been acquired by the City, the developer will undertaken the construction of the required street improvements. The terms and conditions of that Agreement state that all City costs incurred, for those right -of -way acquisition efforts, shall be reimbursed by Toll Brothers. B. Spring Road Widening: City Project No. 8026 provides for the widening of Spring Road between New Los Angeles Avenue and the rail crossing, in order to provide painted Bike Lanes and a raised landscaped median. The design for that project is nearing completion and right -of -way acquisition efforts have been initiated. ROW1 Misc C �, �� Right -of -Way Acquisition Grimes Canyon Road / Spring Road August 7, 2003 Page 2 C. Property Acquisition Services: The City has retained the services of a consultant to assist in these right -of -way acquisition efforts. The property rights required including all or some of the following: • street rights -of -way, • temporary construction easements, • slope easements, • landscape maintenance easements, etc. The services required for these property acquisition efforts include: • Appraisals • Title work • Engineer (legal description) • Right -of -Way Acquisition Agreements • Offer letters, meetings, negotiations, etc. • Escrow, etc. D. Authorization In order to expedite this process, it is requested that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute documents and otherwise administer the process required to complete the acquisition of these street rights -of -way and related easements. Said authority would include authorizing payment of amounts consistent with the values set forth in an approved Appraisal Reports. Should it become necessary to initiate eminent domain proceedings for any such acquisition, the matter would be brought to the City Council for authorization to initiate such proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to execute documents related to the acquisition of certain street rights -of -way and related property rights required for the construction of the projects described in this Agenda Report, and authorize the City Clerk to accept and record any such documents. ROW Misc '� _ MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 10 .:E . TO: The Honorable City Council Cj FROM: John Hartnett, Recreation Manager Peggy Rothschild, Senior Center Coordinatorlor— DATE: August 8, 2003 (CC Meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of a Ventura County Area Agency on Aging Grant Application for Older Americans Act Title III -D Funds for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services at Senior Centers and Authorizing City Manager to Sign All Related Agreements DISCUSSION The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution (Attachment A) approving and authorizing the submittal of a grant application to the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging (VCAAA) for $5,000 in Older Americans Act (OAA) funds for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion services. To be eligible, agencies must be able to spend the funds by the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2004). These funds are being awarded through the Older Americans Act Title III -D. The City of Moorpark Active Adult Center provides a variety of services focusing on disease prevention and wellness for older adults, including exercise classes, fitness talks, health screenings and flu shots. If awarded, the proposed grant funds would be used to provide one -on -one nutrition counseling at the Moorpark Active Adult Center to adults age 60 and older, provided by an on -site registered dietitian. Grant applications were due June 23, 2003, at 4:00 p.m., and staff submitted an application for funding by that date. As a result, there was not sufficient time to present the City Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 Council with the necessary resolution. As has been the case in the past, VCAAA has agreed to accept an adopted resolution by the City after the application due date. In the event the Council does not approve the proposed resolution, staff will withdraw the application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2003- Attachment: A - Resolution v � w Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- ATTACHMENT A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION REQUESTING MONIES FROM THE VENTURA COUNTY AREA AGENCY ON AGING ( VCAAA) FOR OLDER AMERICANS ACT TITLE III -D FUNDING WHEREAS, the City Council is dedicated to the support of quality programs for older Americans in the City of Moorpark; and WHEREAS, nutrition counseling can provide needed health and wellness information to older adults; and WHEREAS, funds to provide disease prevention and wellness services to adults age 60 and older are available in the form of a grant through the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging ( VCAAA). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the grant application through the VCAAA to secure funds for Disease Prevention and Wellness services to provide nutrition counseling on -site at the Moorpark Active Adult Center. Further, the City Council hereby authorizes Steven Kueny, City Manager, to serve as signatory for the City Council on all matters related to the administration of this grant. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be in the book of original Resolutions. of the filed PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk ITEM � 0 & -0) Moorpark City Council AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst (0 DATE: August 4, 2003 (CC meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Authorizing the City's FY 2003/2004 Transportation Development Act Claim. BACKGROUND Each year the City Council is asked to approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a claim for the City's Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds. The City is required to file this claim annually in order to receive the funds. TDA revenue is generated from a Yv, sales tax that must first be spent on transit projects. After meeting any "unmet transit needs that could be reasonably met using TDA funds," the remaining local TDA funds may be used for streets and road related purposes. If approved, the City would claim its entire apportionment of $1,123,008. DISCUSSION The funds are apportioned to the ten cities and the county using a formula based on population. The City's FY 2003/2004 TDA apportionment is $1,123,008. This year's TDA apportionment is about $194,952 more than last year, when the FY 2002/2003 TDA apportionment was $928,056. Economic conditions and changing consumer spending habits affect the amount of TDA sales tax revenue that is generated. In FY 2001/2002 it was $1,052,297 and in FY 2000/2001, the TDA apportionment was $801,178. TDA revenue is the funding source for the City's transit system, including the Senior Dial -A -Ride and the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) Paratransit Dial -A -Ride that use subsidized taxicabs as the service provider, as well as the Moorpark City Transit fixed routes. Transit planning efforts by Community C F..., `.✓" q CC Meeting of August 20, 2003 Page 2 Services Department staff is also funded with TDA revenue. Capital costs, such as buses, are often funded with federal grants. Usually only the local matching funds (typically twenty percent) comes from TDA funds. TDA funds the City's share of the VISTA -East (Ventura Intercity Service Transportation Authority) regional bus. An annual $400,000 countywide contribution to Metrolink operating costs is taken "off the top" of TDA funds prior to apportioning the funds among the county jurisdictions, as are funds for the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC). The carry over is used to reduce the amount of transit funds needed in the subsequent year. After transit expenses are met, the remainder is available for streets and roads. In anticipation of the City's annual TDA allocation, the TDA revenue from this claim and the associated expenditure of funds were included in the FY 2003/2004 budget. At time of budget preparation, staff estimated that apportionment would be $1,045,277, with Transit (8c) requiring $567,500 of the total TDA apportionment for the City, and the remaining TDA revenue going to the Street and Roads Fund (8a). The final TDA apportion amount available to the City is $77,731 more than the $1,045,277 anticipated. It is important to note that the TDA revenue apportionment does not necessarily match the City budget expenditure apportionment. This is due to annual carry -over of unspent TDA funds from year to year within the transit and streets and roads revenue accounts. By spending down the carry -over of transit funds from previous years, staff recommends that the City reduce its transit claim to $500,000. This, combined with the higher than expected apportionment, will afford a $145,000 increase in the 8a Streets and Roads revenue while still funding all of the transit expenditures approved in the budget. The claim can be considered for approval at this time, and the revenue budget adjustment will be made when the Council considers the midyear budget adjustment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution Nc claim for the City sign the claim for Attachment TDA Staff Report 2003 -2004 2003- , authorizing the FY 2003/2004 TDA of Moorpark, authorizing the City Manager to submittal to VCTC. RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A CLAIM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS. WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Act (TDA) , as amended (Public Utilities Code Section 99200 et seq.), provides for the allocation of funds from the Local Transportation Fund and the State Transit Assistance Fund, for use by eligible claimants for various transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the TDA, as amended, and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations thereunder (Cal. Code of Regulations Sections 6600 et seq.) , a prospective claimant wishing to receive an allocation from the Local Transportation Fund or the State Transit Assistance Fund shall file its claim with the Ventura County Transportation Commission; and WHEREAS, the City has a need for these funds for both transit and street purposes in 2003/2004; and WHEREAS, the City is eligible for an estimated amount of $1,123,008 in Transportation Development Act Funds, Article 8 monies for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Manager and or his designee is authorized to execute and file the City's 2003/2004 TDA Claim in the amount of $1,123,008, broken down as follows: 1. $623,008- Local Transportation Funds Article 8a (Streets and Roads) 2. $500,000 - Local Transportation Funds Article 8c (Transit) - - J TDA Reso Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Ventura County Transportation Commission. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk '7 ITEM 0- aaa� A"' _.: : _ ate Moorpark City Council AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst qfb DATE: August 4, 2003 (CC meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Addendum to the Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) -East Cooperative Agreement, and Cost Allocations. BACKGROUND The Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) transit services began in July 1994 to provide express commuter fixed route bus services between cities in Ventura County. Each route is administered through a Cooperative Agreement among the participating jurisdictions. The VISTA -East Agreement provides for commuter express bus service between the east county cities (Moorpark, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks) and the Agreement is renewed annually with an addendum (attached as Exhibit 1) that documents how the cost will be distributed. The VISTA routes are administered for the member jurisdictions by VCTC, the Ventura County Transportation Commission. VISTA has six routes: VISTA -East Moorpark to Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks VISTA 101 Thousand Oaks to Ventura CSUCI Camarillo and Oxnard to Cal State University Channel Islands Conejo Connection Thousand Oaks to Warner Center VISTA 126 Fillmore to Ventura Coastal Express Ventura to Santa Barbara and Goleta The six VISTA routes operate Monday through Saturday except the Conejo Connection which runs weekdays, and the Coastal Express runs VISTA East Agreement 2003.doc CC Meeting of August 20, 2003 Page 2 seven days a week. Saturday and Sunday service, where provided, is less frequent and shorter hours than weekday service. The VISTA -East service makes eleven round trips between Moorpark and Thousand Oaks (via Simi Valley) on weekdays between 6:00 am and 6:16 pm. On Saturdays, there are eight trips between 6:55 am and 6:13 pm. As the Council may recall, transit operators must meet a certain farebox ratio in order to receive Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding from the 1/0 state sales tax. VISTA -East has had to meet a farebox ratio equal to 200 of its operating expenses. If the 20% is attained from the fare box revenue, the remaining 80% may be eligible for TDA or other state or federal subsidy. Currently, the VISTA -East route has a farebox ratio of 21 %. DISCUSSION The VISTA -East Committee met on April 29, 2003. The VISTA -East Committee, comprised of elected officials from the cities of Moorpark (Councilmember Millhouse), Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, meets each year to discuss the VISTA -East service. The agenda for the meeting included cost sharing arrangements, consideration of service levels, and the VISTA -East Cooperative Agreement. The Committee reviewed testimony received in the Unmet Needs hearing process and VISTA passenger surveys. The total annual cost to operate the VISTA -East service for FY 2003/2004 is estimated to be $478,668. The federal share is $264,475. It comes from the Moorpark- Thousand Oaks Urbanized Area annual allocation. Anticipated fare revenue (including $10,000 from Moorpark College) is $57,000. This leaves $157,193 to be funded by the cities. VISTA -East Anticipated Costs Total Contract Costs $ 478,668 Federal Share <264,475> Fare Revenue <57,000> Total Local City Costs $ 157,193 The three cities agreed to share costs based on population. Moorpark's population is 12.260 of the three -city total, up from 11.560 last year. City of Moorpark residents comprised 27.80 of the ridership, about the same as last year. Moorpark's share of VISTA - East expense will be $19,274 out of the total local cost of C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSWILINDLMLOCAL SETTINGS \TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES \0LK1B \V1STA EAST AGREEMENT 2003. DOC VISTA East Agreement 2003.doc CC Meeting of August 20, 2003 Pagc 3 $157,193. Sufficient funds were appropriated in the City's FY 2003/2004 budget to pay for the City's share of the VISTA -East cost. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Addendum funding VISTA -East for FY 2003/2004, subject to final language approval by the City Manager, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. Exhibit 1 Addendum to Cooperative Agreement Attachment A Route and Service Description Attachment B Performance Reporting C:VDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\MLINDLEY\LOCAL SETTINGS \TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES \OLK1B \VISTA EAST AGREEMENT 2003.DOC C. ���. _nn Cooperative Agreement FY 2003 -04 Page 1 Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM (FY 2003/04) TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2001/02 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) EAST This Addendum to the Cooperative Agreement for VISTA East service is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF MOORPARK (Moorpark), the CITY OF SIMI VALLEY (Simi Valley), the CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS (Thousand Oaks) and the VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (VCTC). Moorpark, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks are collectively referred to herein from time to time as the "AGENCIES." This Addendum continues the services described in revised Attachment A, under the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement, FY 2001/02, Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East, for FY 2003/04. Section 3: Fundine For FY 2003/2004, the required local match shall be paid by the AGENCIES as stated below. Percent Approximate Annual Share City of Moorpark 12.26% $19,274 City of Simi Valley 42.85 % $67,356 City of Thousand Oaks 44.89% $70,563 (Revised) Attachment "A"- Route and Service Description- is attached and incorporated herein by this reference. (Revised) Attachment "B "- Performance Reporting- is attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Except as amended and revised herein, the terms and conditions set forth in the Cooperative Agreement (FY 2001 -02) shall remain in full force and effect. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dates stated below. CITY OF MOORPARK APPROVED AS TO FORM By Date City Attorney Date Cooperative Agreement FY 2003 -04 Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East CITY OF SIMI VALLEY By CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS By Date Date EXHIBIT I Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Date VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By Date General Counsel Date Cooperative Agreement FY 2003 -04 Page 3 Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East Attachment A (Revised) ROUTE AND SERVICE DESCRIPTION The following is a general description of the VISTA -EAST COUNTY service, which may be revised and/or adjusted during the fiscal year by agreement of the AGENCIES. The route is an intercity, fixed route, express bus service in eastern Ventura County with connections to adjacent Los Angeles County. The route includes stops at: Thousand Oaks Transit Center (Rancho Road), Oaks Mall, Westlake Boulevard/Townsgate Road and the Thousand Oaks Library in Thousand Oaks; Country Club Rd./Wood Ranch, and Madera Road/Los Angeles Avenue in Simi Valley; Moorpark College, and the Moorpark Metrolink Station in Moorpark. On weekdays, service will operate between approximately 6 AM and 7 PM. In the morning and evening peak hours, the buses will run on approximately 60- minute headways. In the off -peak hours, the headways may increase to approximately 120 minutes. The peak hours will be a maximum of three hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon. Saturday service will operate between approximately 7 AM and 6 PM. The buses will run on approximately 60- minute headways. In the off -peak hours, the headways may increase to approximately 120 minutes. The peak hours will be defined in the final schedule, but it will be a minimum of three hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon. The schedule will be arranged to provide timed transfers with local and intercounty transit providers such as the Simi Valley Transit (which provides connecting access to the Simi Metrolink Station); Thousand Oaks Transit, the VISTA- 10 1 /Conejo Connection service, Moorpark Transit, and Los Angeles MTA as feasible. VISTA EAST one -way passenger fares are: $1 for adults between 21 and 61 years of age; $1 for youth 6 to 20 years; and 50 cents for seniors aged 62 and older and for persons with disabilities. Children 5 and under ride free if accompanied by fare paying adult. The SmartCard Passport fares are: adults $40; youth $40; seniors and persons with disabilities $20. Purchased monthly, this passport is valid for unlimited trips on all Ventura County fixed -route public bus systems (not including inter- county service). A cash debit feature is also available. For an additional 50 cents per trip, holders of the base pass may use the Dial -A- Rides, except on systems where this offer is not valid. Cooperative Agreement FY 2003 -04 Ventura Intercity Service Transit Authority (VISTA) East Attachment B (Revised) PERFORMANCE REPORTING On a quarterly basis, VCTC will calculate and provide operating statistics and performance indicators for Weekday service, Saturday service, and for All Periods combined, for monthly, quarterly, and total year -to -date periods, to include: • Farebox Revenues • Farebox Recovery Ratio* • Contractor Operating Cost • Total Adjusted Operating Costs • Passengers • Total Operating Cost per Passenger • Vehicle Service Hours • Total Operating Cost per Vehicle Service Hour • Passengers per Vehicle Service Hour • Total Hours • Vehicle Service Miles • Passengers per Vehicle Service Mile • Total Miles Page 4 S * Farebox Recovery Ratios shown will be the adjusted ratio so that all transit systems may be compared equally. For all VISTA contract services, this means that operating costs equal the sum of operating and maintenance costs contained in each contract, or, conversely, contract costs minus all capital costs. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council rMM 0' L • ( . , , .i;Nl !A 61 r J`-?a aoQ3. - A( _ a444 4-"-4d AO&4--4 Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk �cjT Blanca Garza, Deputy City Clerk aCr August 15, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) BACKGROUND Consider Rejection of Claim: SBC On July 21, 2003, the City received the above referenced claim for damages. The claim was forwarded to the City's claims adjuster for review. DISCUSSION The claim was submitted for damage to an SBC cable that occurred on June 11, 2003, when the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency contractor (Rollins Consulting, Inc.) was demolishing a building on High Street. The location is stated as occurring at 226 High Street. Generally, the claim states the City's hired contractor cut a 50 pair cable with a bulldozer during the demolition of the building. The City's claims adjuster evaluated the facts and tendered the claim to Rollins Consulting for their investigation and handling. Staff received verification on August 14 that the full amount of the claim has been paid to SBC through the cooperation of Rollins Consulting. The City's claim adjuster recommends that the City Council reject the claim (even though the claim has now been paid). STAFF RECO14MNDATION Reject the claim and direct staff to send a standard rejection letter to the claimant. ITEM AC dg3tA& Moorpark City Council AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst qf�) DATE: August 4, 2003, (CC meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Thousand Oaks Cab Company Request for Dial -A- Ride Rate Increase. DISCUSSION The City has an Agreement with Thousand Oaks Cab Company to provide the senior and disabled Dial -A -Ride transportation services. The term of the Agreement ends June 30, 2004. The City recently received a letter from Thousand Oaks Cab Company requesting a rate increase (see Attachment A). If approved, the rate paid by the City for its senior and disabled paratransit Dial -A -Ride services would increase $.10 to $2.10 per "flag drop" and increase $.10 per mile to $2.10. The request amounts to a 5% increase. The "flag drop" charge is incurred when the cab driver drops the meter "flag" at the beginning of the trip. Mileage charges are added to the flag drop amount in increments of one -tenth of a mile until arrival at the destination. The cities of Thousand Oaks, Westlake Village and the county of Ventura, all of whom contract with Thousand Oaks Cab Company, have approved this rate increase. The City has sufficient funds in its FY 2003/04 paratransit budget to absorb the requested rate increase. When a senior or disable passenger receives Dial -A -Ride service, they pay $1.50 per trip and the City pays the difference based on the approved aforementioned rate. In FY 2002 -2003, 392 trips were provided to senior and disabled riders and the cost to the City was $2,398.50. The Moorpark Dial -A -Ride service is available during the same hours of operation as Moorpark City Transit: 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday though Friday. In 2002, the City Council extended the Dial - A -Ride service to senior citizens aged 62 and older (prior to that Subsidized Taxi Service CC Meeting of August 20, 2003 Page 2 the service was only provided to qualified disabled persons). Senior citizens sign up for the service with the City. Disabled residents apply for ADA certification from VCTC. Currently there are about forty -four (44) seniors and sixty (60) disabled people with ADA certification in Moorpark. Both services are curb to curb service. The Moorpark Senior Dial -A -Ride service is available only to City of Moorpark residents for trips within the City of Moorpark. The City's disabled ADA Dial -A -Ride service is able to provide inter- city service to Thousand Oaks, Westlake, and Camarillo without cost to City. This is possible because the ADA disabled service receives federal funding from the Moorpark- Thousand Oaks Urbanized Area (UZA). In Fiscal Year 2002 -2003, 1,498 inter -city trips were provided to City of Moorpark residents at a subsidy cost of $27,369. As indicated, Moorpark's share is paid for with federal funds. Passengers paid $2,918 for these trips last fiscal year. The City is not obligated to approve the requested rate increase. However, to avoid confusion staff recommends that the Council authorize the increase. The cost of the increase to the City is estimated to be less than $100 annually based on the City's current ridership. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the new Thousand Oaks Cab Company rate of $2.10 per flag drop and $2.10 per mile effective September 1, 2003, and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute an addendum to the City's Agreement. TO Cab rate incrcasc.doc C F` s * ^ i �A�11 ,44nx-fl A THOUSAND OAKS CAB CO. "Serving the Conejo Valley Since 1960" July 31, 2003 John Brand City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Moorpark Dial -A -Ride Rate Increase Dear Mr. Brand: This may seem a bit of a nuisance request, but we ask your indulgence. We have increased our rates for the Thousand Oaks, Westlake, A.D.A. and County D.A.R. programs. All have been increased to $2.10 flag drop and $2.10 per mile - this is a 5% increase. Predicament! We only have two price positions on the taximeter - one for the Dial -A -Ride programs and the other for the regular taxi fares. We know that the Moorpark Dial -A -Ride contract is in effect until June 30, 2004 at $2.00 flag drop and $2.00 per mile - wherein lies the problem. We no longer have a $2.00 rate on the meter as they now read $2.10 for all the other D.A.R. programs. Therefore, we request a 5% increase on your D.A.R. program to alleviate this problem. In pure dollars and cents, your last month's billing, which was $107.70, would be increased 5% to $113.09 - a $5.39 increase. Again, this is a bit of a nuisance request but we ask your indulgence all the same. Please advise if this request can be accommodated. If it can't, we understand and will deduct the 5% from the support documentation on your account. Thanking you in advance for your attention to this request, I remain, Si cerel / Alan R. Reer Vice President 1285 1/2 E Thousand Oaks Blvd. Thousand Oaks, Ca 91362 phone: (805) 495-3500 fax: (805) 389 -0238 ►�J ITEM 10-- N . �r Sao -aoo.� a,c i ­%� : 'r'Q= r -n Moorpark City Coundi: lizio"° � AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst 1613 DATE: August 12, 2003 (CC meeting of August 20, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Transfer of Ownership of Coach USA. BACKGROUND If approved, the City's Agreement with Antelope Valley Bus /Coach USA would be transferred to a new company, CUSA, when it acquires Antelope Valley Bus and other Coach USA properties. The Coach USA Company, the parent of the City's contractor for Moorpark City Transit, has reached an agreement in principle to sell certain assets including Antelope Valley Bus /Coach USA. Coach USA prepared the attached letter requesting City approval of the transfer of ownership to CUSA, LLC, the proposed buyer. Staff is assured that there will not be any material impact on the Agreement with the City of Moorpark or on the services provided for the maintenance and operation of Moorpark City Transit. All of the key personnel identified in the proposal submitted to the City will remain in place. Antelope Valley Bus /Coach USA is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Stagecoach Holdings, PLC, and a transportation firm based in Scotland. The Coach USA Company is the largest provider of motor coach and tour services in the United States. Coach USA is comprised of what were once many local, privately held charter, transit, motor coach, and limousine companies that were consolidated through mergers and acquisitions beginning in the 1980's. Antelope Valley Bus started in Lancaster, CA as a charter bus service. It grew to become a regional firm, and the City of Moorpark first contracted with Antelope in 1990 to operate the Moorpark City Transit fixed route. It and the VISTA routes are CC Meeting of August 20, 2003 Page 2 among the few transit operations that Antelope Valley Bus has. Coach USA acquired Antelope Valley Bus in April 1997. Coach USA is organized into several divisions and subsidiaries. The City is contracted with Antelope Valley Bus /Coach USA, which along with California Charter, is a subsidiary of The Coach USA Company's western charter division. Earlier this year, the Scottish ownership of Coach USA began to market its holdings in the United States. Various regional divisions of the company have been "spun off" in recent months. There is a different Coach USA entity sometimes called "Coach USA Transit" that was sold to First Transit earlier this year. Coach USA Transit has contracts with MTA and other Los Angeles area transit agencies. The Coach USA Transit division and the charter division, with which the City has its Agreement, operate independently of each other. The South Central and Western divisions of Coach USA Charter are being sold to CUSA LLC, a wholly -owned subsidiary of KBUS Holdings, LLC. This proposed sale involves eighteen companies, including Antelope Valley Bus, in several western states. KBUS Holdings is said to be a New York - based, private investment group formed specifically to buy and hold Coach USA properties. At this time, the buyer is completing its due diligence and the seller is obtaining the necessary approvals. The sale must be approved by state and federal regulators and by customers such as the City of Moorpark that have service agreements that require approval to transfer the Agreement. The Coach USA Company and KBUS Holdings hope to get the necessary approvals to complete the sale in early September. The Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) considered and approved the transfer of its VISTA contracts at its July meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the transfer of the Agreement for Maintenance and Operation of Moorpark City Transit to CUSA, LLC. Attachment �• v v Coach USA Transfer &AIM August 5, 2003 City of Moorpark Attention: Mr. John Brand 799 N. Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Agreement for Services Dear Mr. Brand: 1' i! As you are likely aware, Coach USA, Inc. has entered into an agreement to sell its Southwestern and Western divisions including Antelope Valley Bus, Inc., to CUSA, LLC, a wholly -owned subsidiary of KBUS Holdings, LLC. As part of this transaction, the buyer has agreed to assume and requested an assignment of the agreement(s) referenced above between you and Antelope Valley Bus, Inc. We intend for there to be a seamless transfer of operations from Antelope Valley Bus, Inc. to CUSA, LLC. Moorpark City Transit riders will experience the same friendly staff, who will continue to operate the same facilities in the same manner and over the same routes as Antelope Valley has provided the service in the past. This transaction is scheduled to close in early September. In order to insure a smooth transition of our operations to the new owner, we would very much appreciate if you would sign and return the enclosed Consent to Assignment certificate. Please have the appropriate individual sign the Consent to Assignment certificate and send one original copy to Kevin Rohnstock, a representative of Buyer, in the enclosed prepaid, self - addressed envelope. Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 713- 860 -1717 or Mr. Rohnstock at 303 - 223 -1154. Sincerely, Robert Longo m 1sc -5 612803\795904.2 One Riverway, Suite 500 • Houston, Texas 77056 -1921 • (713) 888 -0104 Toll -free (888) COACH -USA • Fax (713) 888 -0257 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 10 - 0- „f TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo DATE: August 14, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing the Community Development Director to Extend the Time on a Temporary Use Permit for a Temporary Equipment Storage Yard Located on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue between Maureen Lane and Leta Yancy Road on the Property Known as the Pacific Communities Site (Val Verde Construction, Applicant) BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION Val Verde Construction is the contractor for the Calleguas Municipal Water District waterline extension project. Val Verde has applied for a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for a construction yard located on the south side of Los Angeles Avenue between Maureen Lane and Leta Yancy Road; on the same site as the approved Pacific Communities project. The proposed construction yard would have vehicular access to and from Los Angeles Avenue, located approximately half way between Maureen Lane and Leta Yancy Road. The site would be contained by a six -foot high chain link fence. The Community Development Director has the authority to approve a TUP for ninety days with one ninety day extension, but not long enough for the duration of this project. The project is expected to take ten months to construct. This is a public project being constructed for the Calleguas Municipal Water District. The location of the construction yard is a substantial distance from any adjacent residential or commercial uses. The operation and use of the yard would be subject to conditions set forth by the Community Development Director. Staff does not anticipate any potential problems with this use. S: \Community Development \ADMIN \COUNCIL \Mist Reports \val verde TUP extension Cc Agenda rpt.doc Gr-,�, _.:�*.~ Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 STAFF RECO14MENDATION Authorize the Community Development of the Temporary Use Permit for Val construction yard for a total of ten water line construction project in later. Director to extend the life Verde Construction for the months or to the end of the the City, whichever occurs MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM 10• P• TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Walter Brown, City Engineer (,Uf"e Prepared by Clara Magana, Assistant Engineer M DATE: August 1, 2003, 2003 (CC Meeting of 8/20/03) SUBJECT: Final Map Approval for Tract Map No. 4928 -3 (Toll Bros.) BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION Tract 4928 -3 is the third and final phase of the Toll Brothers Moorpark Country Club Estates development located in the northwest corner of the City, east of Grimes Canyon Road and west of Walnut Canyon Road. The entire project consists of 216 single family homes and 2� holes of golf and a country club. Phases 1 and 2 consist of a total of 95 homes, 89 production homes and 6 model homes. Tentative Tract Map No. 4928 -3 of the subdivision creates 121 single family residential lots, 10 lots for open space and manufactured slopes, 6 lots for private streets and various easements for dedication, and 1 lot for water purposes. The Phase 3 map also provides for the vacation of excess right -of -ways previously acquired by the City of within all phases of the project. City staff has reviewed the conditions of approval for the Tentative Tract Map to make sure compliance is achieved prior to or as part of the Final Map. The City Engineer has reviewed the Final Map and is satisfied that it is technically correct and that it is substantially in conformance with the approved tentative map. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and the City Clerk to cause Tract Map 4928 -3 to be recorded in the office of the Ventura County Recorder. G U .. i- Honorable City Council August 20, 2003 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map. 2. Reduced copy of Tract Map 4928 -3. 'J PROJECT SITE M ORPARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE c-Aa IF, rm;n- �y/ I CITY OF MOORPARK VICINITY MAP CN .1 I 4 > �( 3 a i ■ a 0 w m 1?-.3 OWNER'S STATEMENT SURVEYORS STATEMENT CITY ENGINEERS STATEMENT THE U"OERSCNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE RE CWHENS Or THE REAL HIS MAP wAS PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER 4Y GREGINN AND IS BASED RRWERrr IxttuDED'MmIN THE BWHDARY OF IRE wNEEPAGON SHOWN ON NIS MAP. A OEW $HR`EY M CONFORMANCE Wln THE REWIREMEXiS OF NEREBx STATE THAT NAK EXAMINED THIS MAR; THAI IT CORFORAIS THAT ,HEY ARE Tx Y PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS TIRE mC wBGVSON MAP AC, AND LOCAL ORDINARCE AT THE RCWEST a IIIA MAP AMID ANY APPROVES WRRATIOMS 0 SAID REAL PROPERTY. THAT THEY CONSENT i0 THE MAKING AND RCCGRCATIW OF FO L CA LP., A CNFORIA LMUED PARTNERSHIP IN APRIL. ]O00_ I THEREOF - PRO-S OF THE SROM9W MAP AC, NO ANY 5N0 MAP AND SIADPITSM AS SHOMEH WTHIN TIE Ex1ERIGH BOUND FIT LINES AND MAP SJBS,ANT -1 CORMS 10 LANDk LOCAL ORDINANCES APPLICNI[ AT mC RAPE OF APPROVAL OF THE HEREBY STALE THAT THIS TRACT p Al THEY DO HEREBY OFFER i0 OEDTCATC ,O OF MOORPARK FOR PUBLIC THE APPROVED OR CONDIRONALLr APPROAEO TENTATIVE MAP. If Nv SSE' A. IEN1AlIAE MAP, K REWIRED, HAK BEEN COMFUED W,H; AND I AM LAND �S,� MAP ,EOMIGLLY CORRECT. 'SE, A HTENARCE AND CONSRUCTNA PURPOSES.E THE RICH -a-WAI FOR V WLb. J SAMSIED THAI THE 5 CIMPIONSUP GROW AS SHOWN W THE MAP. v AND THAT ME DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE GTY OF MWRPARK, ALL AEIICULAR bHAEL A KENNNA LS 5612 pAlf: y L.S.SB12 y DATE 100_ ACCESS RIGHTS INCLUDING INGRESS AND EGRESS TO CHANPPONSAP DRINE LICENSE EKPIRES: 03/31/0) CaR[6 dn1p7 E %P. 9 /]0/M N9lf. O HENEBY 11 F WCONTRANK - PUBLIC UTILITY AND J}9 N0. 4364 EASETHATSRES «EaEMCATE PUBLIC ` THE Slatu DRAIN MONUMENTATION STATEMENT GALA au>or n. -, 011 ENCIAIN /f'Di DAUAO�2 40ONPA. AND AT WE DO HERESY DEDIC "re 1a mf arr a uaORPAN, EASEMENTS GAS LOTS A C, E, G, H. 50. 78 AND 115 AS SIOXN NEN[ON, ALL MONUMFNis SHOWN ON THIS MM ARE OF PE CHARLACIER AND AND THAT WE 00 HER BY DEDCAIE r0 THE air OF YOOFPANK. THE A,GW DRAIN OCCUPY THE LOCATIONS MRICATED (OR Wu BE IN SUCH ESRON BY DEDICATE Of MO IS WITHIN OARS YEAR AFTER E FILING a S TRACT MAP) D ARE U. p �pNp g CITY COUNCILS CERTIFICATE INGRESS D EGRESS, AN MCITY LNDSCAPE Rul ENANCE EASEMENTS OVER LOTS A. G E, L, H. 5D. 78 AND 115 AS SHOWN WLL BC) SUFFICIENT i0 ENABLE 5 SuftKY t0 BE Rf1RAa0. T A �j_ MAP CN,OLEG TRACT N0. 1929 -3. CON95TING OF 21 SHEETS IS PRESENTED i0 RE CITY COUNCIL MANTE �T _ THE CITY OF MOORPNK OF VENTURA COUNTY, CNFOR IA AT A -AN MEETING OF SAID CWNO HERE EH5 3 HELD ON THE_ DAY OF 2003 FOR APPROVAL, SNO COUNOL HEREBY APPROVES SAID AND AT EE 00 HEREBY EEOC TE 1 THE CITY a MOptPARN, RE NON- BUILDARLC y L5.5612 } MAP AND DSO HEREBY ACCEPTS THE EASEMENTS FOR S-M GRAN PURPOSES AND ALSO HEREBY RESTRICTED USE EASEMENTS AS GH HCREW. MICHAEL A. KEN-U, Ls. %12 DATE: ,P FIDn[5 N/31/01 Ts E STORM GRAIN INGRESS AND EGRESS, CONSRUCTRA AND uNNTCNNGE. LANDSCAPE ARID "CACEiLPMNHTENANICE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPTS THE SE EKPRES: 0]/11/0] P EASEMENTS AS DEDICATED HEREON ARD LICENSE �. .+F NON - BUILDABLE RESTRICTED USE EASEMENT AS SHOWN AND ALSO HEREBY ACCEPTS FOR PUBUC LIST, AND RAT WE DO nEKBI OFGCAT[ O THE arr OF MWRPARK, N ACCESS EASEMENT DAR THOSE AREAS SHOMIN FOR ROAD PURPOSES. CAR LOTS A IN- F F NAN,ENANCE AND CONSTHUCRON PURPOSES THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR CHAMPWSHm EPA AS A. AGENOESI NDFPO"UBUCVUi LIKES PRONDINGRFORPUBLIC All AND NONCE NONCE IS HEREBY OKN r0 AIL PARTIES HANNC INTEREST IN THE LARO. OR � CpLT ECOIGTEE HEREON AND &SO HEREBY ACCEPTS VEHILULN ACCESS RIGHTS AS DEDICATED HEREON AND BY DCSGNA,TON Lw nERF8Y ACCEPTS THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DEDICATED HEREON AND ALSO HEREBY LEGG AN,ARAE NCLGRE. CWSDERIHG INTENST N THE LAND. OR A PORTION RENEGE. ACCEPTS IN C EWESTRIAN PICASS AND EGRESS EASEMENTS AS DEDICATED HEREON AND 450 HEREBY NIDERG, OR LETTERED. LOW, A5 SOON HEREON: ,n "T THE Y mC EASEMENTS PERTAINING t0 ALL AIR SPACE ABOVE A PLANE THREE (3) FEET ABO RE AND THAT WE 00 HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE VEN,UNA COUNTY WATERWORKS pSRIC, ACi NO. 1928 WA5 CONDITIONALLY APPROVE, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY WATERLINE OF MOGRPARK AS RESOLUTION NO 96 -1197. D ,HAT THE MINOR MODIFICATION ND. CURB' ERNE LINE FOR RE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING vHOBSRUCiCD NSBLITY As DEDICATED NO. 1. AN CASEMENT OVER LOTS G AND U THR- 0, INCLUSAE. FOR EHNF PURPSES, SNITARY SEWER PURPOSES. ACCESS PURPOSES AND CONSTRUCTION AND , OF SAID TENTARK MAP. WAS CONDITION APPROKD. BY SAID CITY COUNCIL AS HD AL50 HEREBY ACCEPTS ACCESS EASEMENTS OVER THOSE AREAS SHOWN AS PRIVATE R IS W BEHALF OF ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES -DING FOR TIE PUBLIC MNNICNANCE PURPOSES TO SERVICE RE SAME. N SIGN, RESOLUTION NO Op0 -169 AND ,H THE MINOR MODIOCATION N0. 3, OF SAID ,EEMErALIA AAPO WAS CONDITIONALLY APPROKO, BY SAID CWNCH. As RESOLUTION NO. . HEALTH AND WELFARE AND ALSO HEREBY APPROA£S THE S B MAP PURSUANT TO THE OF SECTION 66U6(P)(3NA) OF THE SIB -SIN" MAP ACT, WE ALSO HEREBY ABANDON AND THAI WE DO HEREBY GEOTCA,E i0 T CITY OF 400RPARK, THE EWESIRIAN 2 1 -i . AN HAT, THE MINOR MONFICATIW N0. 5. OF SAID TNTA,IVE MAR, WAS OVSCNS _DITSIZALLY APNROVCD, BY SAID COUNOL As RESOLUTION NO. D PURSUANT TO SECTION 66199.20 1/2 OF RE wBGAGUA MAP ACT ALL EASEMENTS AND OFFERS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS EASENENR AS SION RERERIN. THAT OuTKNS CairAN LONGRWS OF APPROVAL THAT STAY A£'RCT THE CAT DIN OF NIGHT -OF -WAY FOR ROAD NRPOSES ACWIRED BY THE CITY OF MOORPARK PER THE NL HEREBY OFOCAIE TO inE CITY OF NOORPARIR AN GYNCNT PERTAINING 10 ALL DEVELOFMENi OR ENTIILE4CN15 FOR OFAELOPMENT, AND SAID IulERESI IN SAO LAND, AP OF TRACT N0. 1928 -I. RECOROED IN BOOK 111. PAIZ 53 OF MISCELLNCWS RECORDS (NAPSS IN AIR SPACE AeOAE A TINE THREE (3) FEET ARM ME TCP OF CURB" GRADE LINE AS SHOWN HEREON. AND SHALL APPLY TO HIS PROECT. OR PHASED PORROIH OFFICE OF ,TIE COUNTY NECOROER OF vENTUNA COUNTY, CALNNFOR THAT ARE LITON RP 1ni TO TIE PURPOSE OF M- TAINING UNOBSTRUCTED M981LITY DAR LOTS 0 AND E AS REREOF. MAP AS EASEMENT 'r A NESERVARW FOR NA CItt OF MOaRPARN FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES SqN W SAD MAP. SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: IN WRfss NHEREOF, suo air COUNCIL TINS CAUSED THIS Y SETT[ T[ TO Br r E GE INC A RE SCNATURES OF THE FOIOMING PRESENT OXACRS OF EASEMENTS HAAS BEEN GLUTTED UNDER KATE TO DANO TIE CaRPOR 1E sEALSOF SAID Ottna xH[D TOLL A. L P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AS OWNER 10 A PORTION THE PROSE' OARS OF SECTION 661]6 A OF TIE SUBOVSON MAP ACT, TnER INTEREST TS HERETO A ARE NOT REWIRED BY ,TIE NOORPLARK LO BENNF BY; TOLL CA GP CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER. SUCH 71AT BODY: "" OT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE. NG SAID SGNAiuRCS 1. SO TARN CALIFORNIA COSON COMPANY. PRESENT OVER OF EASEMENTS PER DEEDS RECORDED ION_ MARCH 21, 1961 IN SOON 1977 PACE 316 CF OFFICT- RECORDS: NOVEMBER 15. 1963 IN BOON Tw5 DAY OF BY: Br: 2127, PACE 257 OF OFFICIAL NECONDS OFCEMBEIR 28. 195 N BOOK 3210. PACE 21 OF OFFICIAL TITLE: TITLE. RECORDS; MAY 16, 1980 IN BDON 565555,, PAGE 962. AUWST 22, 2001, AS IX RUMEN, N0. ATTE51, 2001 - 165710 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. D MAY 21, 2002, As NSTRUMENT X02002- 238]7, OF TOLL BROS.. INC.. A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, AS BENEFICIARY OFFIGAL RECGROS. UNDER DEED OF TRUST, RECORDED JANUARY, 6. 1999. AS INSTRUMENT n. PACIFIC BELL A cuHOwRTA CaaPORAnoN, vRESNT DNCR OF Ary EIS[MNL FOR UTILITIES, OE FFENS TY OERK RICK HvNTLLK MAYOV NO. 99- 00]019 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS . PER DEED RECORDED MARCH 20. 19W IN B NCH %57, - 11 OF OFFIGU RECORDS OF TON[ OTr OF O O m[ H7TY OF MOORPNK ]. THE UNITED STATES a AMERICA, ACING By AND RRWw THE D.S. ARMY Cams. or COUNTY TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE K 2 "OOOERAS PNSTTFKMENTNno. -157- OFFlaAL q[NIi00NS PuRPps[S RECdiD[O OCTOBER O Br: 2000 OF r cERnry THAT ALL CERTIFICATES AND sfcuRlrr REWIRES uxDN r W a gCITaxs 66192 TITLE: nrlf'. AND 6619] OF ,IC SUBOIWSIGV MAP ACT HAAS BEEN FILED AND OEP09TED WN E S RE CITY DE MOORPARK. PRESENT OVER O EASEMENT THAT O FUTURE 17 A N RE9pENTOL OFKLOP4ENT, AND FOR PUBLIC UTTUTV PURPOSES AND ANON -WTRRCT A RE928 -,. EAR. 200 COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES AT MOORPARK MASTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION, USE EASEMENT - FIRE 4oO0cxn(x Puav05E5, ALL N PER THE MAP a C, N0. E92e -1. A CALIFORNIA NON - PROFIT MUTUAL BENEFIT CORPORATION, AS OWNER RECORDED IN BOON 1N, PACE 53 OF NISCELLNEOUS RECORDS (MAPS). =CL G. PITTAN rxx TD A PORTION. FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNATURE OMISSION NOTES, SEE SHEET 4 FOUR,r FNTU.AIR WDN1Y TA AEHTUC ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE VENTURA COUNTY WATER WORKS BY: ec DISTRICT NO. 1 BY DEPUTY % c FOR wATERUNE, Tv [WARTY TA aLECTOR ITIL: TIRE GNISTISTO CERTIFY THAT RE EASEMENTS OKR LOTS J THROUGH 0, Nttu9VE. AN I WATER WORKSEDIS RICCTSNOUI. AA GONER M N7ALHAGEN Y. ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED BY TIE COUNTY COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE UNCHER -ED OFFICER (W BEHALF OF SNO DISTRICTEPUNSCAN, TO N,IORRY CONFERRED BY 7, 1998 RESOLUTION OF RE BOARD OF YAPERVSORS OF VENTURA COUNTY ADOPTED M APRLL FILED TITS _ DAY OF 2G0- AT _M NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT TN OF ASCELLN[WS RECORDS (MAPS), AT PAGES GATED: RONALD C COMS REQUEST Or THE OWNER. TOLL CA LP, A CALTFORNIA UNITED PARTNERSHIP. AS DENCR. STATE OF CkIFORNIAI P BLIC ITCH KS DIRECTION Ai ,n[ Or AU,ORNI A STATE o<CIIII CC a OINGE) STATE D DEN Y. e . BEFORE ME A NO PUBUC IN AND FOR SAO STATE. RD OFFC TIER PERSONALLY APPEARED � No PERSOn"Y KNOWN TO CWNTr TINA w6SCIPB/EEDD TO TIE WRIN INSTRUMENT D ACKNOWLEDGED 1) YC THAI M[�E%SHEY ExECUTCO RE SAME N ROBERT L. aRACW, CHIEF DEPUTY. COUNTY wRVEYOR ME (ER PRp Ep 1D ME DN ,HE BASIS a SATISFACTORY EWGfNLE)) rp OH(s) NGSC NAMES) MS,AN` TRACT N 0. 4928 -3 BEHALF)'OF "WHIICHATE aIETCUTED -ENT, THE PERSONR S( ). ORR t"1UHF [ENNT 7Y OPEN PERSON(s) ACTED. TIE NEI NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, WmESS AT RAND, STATE OF CALTIFURNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA GS GNATU" P PEACE OF BUSNEGS 5 COUNT OF OR GO J COUNTY BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21. 22, 26, 28, 29, 30, NOTARY SUC IN AND FN SAID STATE . efroRE 4E raR wo STATE. "" " Y vueLIC NEasDHALLr «NON ro 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND PERSONALLr ASmuftm' ur cwulsslw ExPURES- ME (OR PROV[0 TO 4E ON THE BAS$ OF ENDENCE i ER1IE P[RSGV(S) WHOSE NAMES) IS /ARE RATISAC10RV (NV.�e P,H I.6) su SCRIBED TO TIE WRIN NsTRME T D ACKNOWLEDGED 701,E r° «TIT H[/sHE/TIEI C.EWTEO THE -1 I" LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS Q 7 AND 8 OF HT THE P FSp1R(S), EON THE ENTITY D UP% 9[IYiuE!)'OF AND WAiACH iIEYP[RSM(S) echo EXECITED THE NSTRuMENT TRACT NO. 4928-1,144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF WTHESS MY AND LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 NOTE PRINCIPU PLUS OF B-NESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC N ND Fa SAp STATE cWN HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. AL EASEMENTS DEDICATED HEREON TO THE CITY OF MOORPARK HAVE SENIOR RIGHTS OVER ANY OTHER EASEMENTS DEDICATED BY THIS MAP MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS. 5642 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 EKPIRES LIST clwuls9ax (Mane P,n1.e) SHEET 1 OF 24 SHEETS ■ a 0 w m 1?-.3 N BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP 30 30 29 T 3 N R 19 W RANCHO SIMI 29 28 ��-j �� 3 2 ! R. _ FB9'i6'2: w ]91261 Y k R. 6' 4 4 R. s 33 5 B 37 c 1 I 5 9 - 13 17 69• }6 }.E D 1 Mme._. s t , 21< 25 Se9.1aTe'f ]'Yk 96.Q R Loo I i \ M P�� �, 6 30 ;34 -= 2 0' .�- - y �Q I y aP --- - - - - -- I 26 69.12'2. E 1,11SY N.. ®— Spp } „pW }6z__„ 89,95,E 1,156: Mme. - ° 38� 8 Ne9.1( ' 8 . �` t { -' 11 wy : y TRACT -~y 'o-i NO. 4928 -1 144”, MR 53 , 22 p� NpN_Bp,� B : _ _.. _r_ R IGTEG1.1.1 �r ° -,3 4e 056 IS- 2111.1 1NF- M y 53 D. RS 79 - 84 _ -Dp' NpN 2 i $ 29 PM 95 N -B ILDABLe e -; -lJ 7 'b/ , pa'mNa- anlnAeLE TED UU 1.1, (A}=: N 2224'W ,323.)]' MAR-' $X69 16 �J 5 39 19 = 8 °' 2 3 MONUMEHf NOTE@ p, O m 35 W rCAR A[rtR 1 1' ['AG 3 °± rr r�O 5 �` ROSE [OUT - - - •,J'1."N' I.Op..1 2:W1143.51' 2 7 I 31 — X69•,3 T �' Mea. -' YiC��wCmncrACwr�OA ruxs OF THIS m AC O4AP. ux[fss - R BY rnRN[R5 Minx pxL Oin[RM4 NOTED LINE, TA�NNC 1SR 56.1 DR NNL Ls 56.1 OR S4W R.,Acho x-- - '---MB9 : 6 X69 ss1 w 16.396' BE SET Io a ITERSECTI 56190E LOT LEES IF FAaP, , CORNERS ,IA, Ale MTn STREET 01 PofA, LO lnE r a w4Y, MTrvx ONE YEAR AFTER ,NE DUNG �Q- �� I / .� Y'• - 1,.RK -, F\ �Y N89'22'.TW .9,223' Y -i_._- _ - _ - 1 $ e ,� (� - � �' J A a ,ns TRACr MA v, ,Aa[ 5 AD, lAIX [ TAG L �E OnERM3[ NOrzO. RxSf Ai Ix Tro a CUR ON Au MOE L0, Lx[s wODU ED OR a WIX sTif[T Rlpi a WAr FOR ALL SM% Lal Lx[S 1.32,6' \ 7 9 6 22.] W .954D9' MM. NI 54 4 \ PM 40 ( 1,0,EPM 36 «- ZAG, NAP. °IN o STREET NOTED HERO- A�x80t °. FOR v,wN oiI YEAR PvWRAg4 FILING a T wAY. BEARING LL SRSE LIT NES ND[- PRDDUD ON IS A6 III o� `e LEAD TAG 5D iRERSEC,L 3. 4 0. 8 \\ I 12 16 ..' 20 24 = 28 32 G�1NINOR BE sr AT ACDL 1,- AD A D INN Un " "N.r CANYON S I SS OFD Lis GI seUNE OF ANYNLROAD RD,SMA.1G GF SET BY TRACT , 11 s RD�q MN 55 PRIMP aY �r 6. BALI xD .91e_, �� HGS NORM S,A BOOM I I I YR 53 DR ND .926_2 1.. 48 PM 39 NGAUNIN, S az PoIC AND D ,ANA a HOT LEE PRDD.D DN FROM LD, CORNER TD — // ... 2643.82' M k R2 -- C /�c 30 P M 37 J� � -. NR9'J9'z3•W 528].6: 4 k R3 5 .. E 'ND�CATC�gAGE 4 ❑i ED z• IP rAGa) Ls. aaD PER as 3m2 53 IS 79 -e1 . N 49 51 ` 53 S� 55 INT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEGICATED TO TIE CITY OF O MOORPANK 2 ED , -I/ LP. NO ❑ TO LOTS 13 AND ,} TAG. PER R2. ACCEP 0 AS 5 N CDR SEC ]0 ! OYYaN Ca USED TO EST. THE N. TRACT E OE NALLF- CT, 1 MR 41. \ 8 i 0� TC�OPO BEFEIiENCE MOOD PURPOSES TO SOUTHERN CuIEgtNIA COISM, "W. [D 1" P. LAGGED \ q i R1 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER 3 MR 41 R1 RECORD DATA PER 8 PM 99 © INDICATES AN EA44ENi FOR POWER LINE RECORDED) H0IMBER 15, 1965 IN BOOK 2417, PAGE 257 OE OFFICIAL RECORDS O ED. 1 -1/2' LP. W /CWC 4 NNL X59'5,'08 ] 41' NO NEE. L.9 4400 PER - 30R2. 53 ITS 79-81. \ AuLN OSfiORNE \ /^ INDICATES RJ INDICATES RECORD DATA PER 95 MR 11 R4 INDICATES RfCORD DATA PER RS 3082. 53 RS )9 -Ba. NRIAiES AN EASEMENT FOR POWER LINE PURPOSES 10 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA [DSw, O RECORDED aCEMBER 28, i96] x BOO( SNOT PAGE }.] OE ORICIAL R[CCRro3. ® CO Su BRASS CAP .MINT PER N2. ACCEPTED AS HIT FOR LOT 31, 11 FO PER R s. SOB2.R53 RS ]9 -BlY0N CS nd4l. CONTRD. s,A AOA, L /� E 631an.eo T 2 N NR 19 W '11 -71J]l RANCHO SIMI R5 INDICATES RECDRD DATA PER 45 RS 98 R121NDICATES RECORD OATH PER 1181551- M/5 -2, R13 INDICATES RCCORD DATA PER 11 RS t4 O INDICATES AN AAGENI APSOMES LILINE NIEPO�001O 0�65TOp O OR ADD u u O HIMIl 6 [OAS RE Orn RNL NDNHOLENDICATING BRASS CAP BEE' 0. Ace i' MTn p UNUME , PER R5 ! BI, AND R s 3D32. SDI. AS TRACT NOW 4928 -3 SURVEYORS INDICATES RECORD DATA PER 29 PM 95 -A MOIEff © IPOERIC s 1TSIAUgp�a EASEMENT RECORDED M SW,n7112C SIFgtNIANEN50 NO: Dj0ANY Fat] .,. Y v s E ED MAY 14 zoo xsiau 2002-1-31. © 3oe2, IP-RIG 206.1. PER R2 AND PER R.5 �I RS A -6.. P NDIGFES PROPORTIONED DATA C —LATE) MEN f0 LOT CORNERS HEi ME FOUND xDCATES Ni[RUNE O ROADWAY. ❑7 NS B e P. NO D L01 ACCCPTDD AS s/E CDV PER Rz. PER R.S. ,fle TAG. . IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON POINTS AS O N HERE) SHOWN HEREON M INDICATES MEASURED Y SEE SHEET 3 FOR AnaTDOFe4L EASEMENT MOTES © D 1NT.RA COUNT. STANDARD WELL MONUMENT PER H.S —1 53 IS >9 -64 BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, CF INDICATES CALCULATED FROM SI FOUND SkW SPIKE AND WASHER DATUM I[TATEMEM: SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE ❑g RRDOAD- P /N2"p.P PER 83111.2111E, ,0.93' FROM THE RA uxD OF LAIU[s cAxral 5 1 5, IS 914 33.34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND CVEB VENTURA CO. FIELD BOOK COORDINATES SYSTEM (CCS 83) ZONE 5. 1983 HAD (1995.5 EPOCH). ,U ED. BRASS CAP. 1H CO SUR, Yat PER R5. ACCEPTED As s/E CON LOT 32 PER R G —2. 53 as FI -e4. LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF °� OF DEMONGS, ARE BASED ON THE ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND UNLESS 01HERMSE NOTED TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCES MULTIPLY GROUND DISTANCE BY .99992000. , t ED, 33/4 E2, RS [ PER RS. 3061. 53 Rs 79 -e., ACCEPTED As S/'w TRACT NO. 4928-1.144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON BEARING BETWEEN NGS HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATIONS LOT }WR LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 AOA1 ALLEN OSBORNE AND ROCK ROCKETDYNE BEING NW 8'15 "E. AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURREY FILED ,2 ED 3 RS 1,P PER R5, B4. ACC[PTED AS ,• LP. PER R2 4 R3 PER R.S. 308}, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. IN BOOK 50. PAGES 85 -100 of RECORDS of SURVEYS, Ix COUNTY s ED. r LP. Ls 6)s PER R,. AND Rs. ,Oe v IS ]9 -64. MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS. 6842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF KNTLNA SCALE T = OW BOUNDARY AREA: 3501038 AC, SHEET 2 OF 24 SHEETS SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND SEE EASEMENT NOTES snwrl -- 8; N6rgYg N75'15'W'E T _ - - - - -- ,,- -L - TRACT NC. 4928 -1 144 MR 53 A. e SEE SHEET 18 _ _ s +�- - - - - - - - = Na•2r3s•E 1w.zs' - - _ "= s]e1'0- °oe•Irss ez>6' sa.59� gees. .... Tin N- sBSOZaD' 'E R N) 900• =02'1']'25' , - FOR H21'35'OOOi 'S6pGE c. EASEM�N�)gIMENS10N3 __-\pj0ep a,'�,� SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET 21 .Y `Y 0B'anr t N815B JtE _ 8.630.00 e26 -Ia5] -2 151.200 - 3 R 1 t\ .new. R= 255.50 SEE SHEET 4 %u Y S'D'E 9'e - - � - Nfisa3'n'E 4- 12.12'9 s 00 N00z'6E ' . ! 'E 1]2 D� %A m CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE . 1 510Y -� N815B JtE _ )1 2 N 6A9e C]3.^'°I 0 5 6 3 - zs ]r , 3 R 1 W 11609 LOT NB$'Se' M _ ~-.ems- i'•59'se' F=5'5o0'L.t'16Y 1 =], 71_�_�� , N =ase= 19•rW --N- -- w6Y S•,4Lx,6..r�..e `_.L�, ,NUS` �i2�sic %E rl'. ;e;oa1lsD i a_.a, e2 �J A` o-,1 E�.56ON ROAD IPRnA1F SmEEp N)au'1tE_ _ _ - H 811•,9'0'' <a^. P� -------------- S� Y ¢ 4, °.n•'3R ' . 1 ✓ Y / 5 i .15100 s t.h.l5' -i- - L.69M R= 56A50' L -I.]]Y N _E62nD, ,Q¢ :QQ� e•15•ss'1J- .�;�$s.. y' 93..:. Y+y ss' / - N.Si as e<a6•'°s''- = -am'o, oi• --+s e,- a. i cd ls9 / SEEP B D Nez1013t , ^�e4 R`2sm arfis si s N 1 . o,lFf 'ET cLTA I Rle NRr_ tro?,W \ ,o e'§a ep� SH Ml1A Atnus - � -__ - q "l ` 3 :g �q /,, qao y1' off. Efi g .N;p y 4�g997'r9i� 111.00 9.51 Io VN tgA'' TF-'� °,aq W = _ 9• 11'92. 1 _- L,„ '---------- ••,?;.., , VALLETTE � TRACT ER H - 4p; '' IS a•�yl zlial e� �1 I c s ni+!_ i "v x's. ;az1�•;;;�; o x m °.I a s . -pAI W s '1', m ` J a o m Ell 08.55'59• 39Doa' 6I -.e,' fjI A�. y' g ••.x b . b,M.c� °;,'&. z _ 3 06-35'14' 3 1 .. '94- o C, b.O• U s 6.a)Ji I.w io sx' 13•m'n' ,0200 2321' I� L I 1 .yQOf'2 n 120 118 117 = L)] 08'15'11' 25550' '255' 28'1911 2000 995' 1 N5e•29'Lb•E o .'''4' yl ~ n.4 i SHf.IB• - m IIR OF•Ir�s- ii;6----- -- -- "`, Na+o`�:; 551 o MR 41 v NI y 121 ` 3 cs m•oe'w• m' 122 ' eli I' 10 ,(�M1 LOTG DLOTAC 06'')5) 2 00' 1210 ° O9•n,9 16.19 I° dye yytiti T¢ I I>E N'01',I' SRS I 1135;19' 1250; 1318' „ II BAD u�' �y8.4. m l 30 If , O�,D N 1. i9•,e5r 6500' 1'.82' U% _._N)s'1rsBT y .8i S -1 " �L -1) 41yS. h Y cli I's),e' 21 DO 11.95 \ - 29.95 q 1 L g12 1p `�q.6• "- '� � ,•'150' O. W' I t } N'2.0''S9•E l�`��o. I 1MR R. 100' 'V �`581j'ph =o;;,¢ '' , RD PCC 's.SWJO. I 1L m . K„•.136'NJ9•y. FF I b2a & '•AV1y_J,1'w ,'R'b (k NJ 4R.y9 DY 241. W,O9NEl5s .3 SC Z"32'05- "s -�. R.e w ai e,u.�l,•3 m' �.. 69.'6e•.N�e• Ia:Si' N]s•tTY•E s. s g2 ep. a 4 `•N, 8,9 ° ,bo J 4 4 ,,"0- W'- , r n ? ' •'.NM,SJ �OSk - % S 'q s / Rio SEE SHEET 19 2 JpN LINE TABLE M.UYENI OFFSET TABLE pOC M� ?YO �Ea�,4 E � -'°-'n ]'r DFC euewc LENCrN oNE aEARNC cTN Nag' FA9EMENT rarea [wNiWxEEB j _ ' _ .apy vimI b•,>z, ,o'm'E le5r �.W e INOICAiES AN EASEMENT F. INGRESS. EGRESS ANU hPEIIN[5 PER GEED RECORDED MAY ,V SY T 11 )SVS'1 As.'IB' O IJ, 1910 IN B0. 366t, PALE & IX -Al REC.OS NAS'1i M'F `� - w S. - ''q'SJ;,y ] 60'S1'OTE 61)1' DIN ITS A EASEMENT F. R.O. PIPELINES AND APPI -ANT FAT IDES RECORDED 963' N'60.39'l3'E OK FEBRUARY 5, 1991 IN - 2270, PAGES 310 AND 319 OF OFFICIAL CORDS. - PIL £ i 0 .NN2•� p agEl L6 BID E 1,19' INDIA, oz AN EASEMENT FOR ,EiEP�DNE LINES, POLLS AND CONDUI,S RECORDED MARCH N6,•?-_2q�_ Qb -w N0.•22'09•W TRACT N 0. 4928 -3 °Lk' Fg9.22'I9'W '3NM' O, w BOON 5657, PALE . OFFICIAL RCC.OS. r20 W INDICATES A N I-- LDABLE, RE-1- U4 EASEMENT DEDICATED 10 THE CITY IX ,6•N'SJ'E 13.20' 'TO O BOON M AV EASE %ENr FOR Puuc UrN�Ir1EZ To s.CE. REWROED uAY I6, 19eo. IN OO YOORPARN !tlV UEL MOwrICA- PURPOSES OFFERED FOR DEDICATION HEREON. NMmWIrW 3.Sa RAT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, ND1D 1 IX OFFID RE Dz ® NTICATES A N.- BUILDABLE RFSDBCTED USE IN MENT DEDCATED TO THE III OF N21'3226'W SSO COUNTY OF VENTUM STATE OF CALIFORNIA �H - FGATES AN EASE FOR ST.M DRAM AND IT- DRNN CONSTRUCT. AND EL MODFICAn. Pu8PO.1 PER TRACT N0. ,928 -I I, AN 53. 39'30'Il'W 3.95' INANCE PURPOSES, FOR THE H.EOWNEeS ASSOIABON TO BE RESERVED IN S N !GR FU n'rss':rW A.DO' BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 2t, 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, D0C O wNPOSES .-TED rTI sTONM DNAOA C.smuCTI. AND MNNTENANCL N.e•3.'.u'E I63e' 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND TEO TO TIE D IX 40CRPARK OFFERED FOR DED[AipN HERE.. I.25'2TW 350' NRSPAtt EASEMENT r0 THE III IX MOORPARN FOR UNOBSTRICTED NABUIY 333 Net',5'OD'[ O IL OSES O W F Nv EAYMENl IOB I-S- I--I- AND EGRESS PUPOSCS DEDCATED 10 ATSIX MOMPARA IXFFRFD FDP DEDICATION HERE.. LJ, Noe•15'aD LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS a 7 AND 8 OF ASENEHI FON PUBLIC UTILITY. SANITARY SEWR, SANITARY SEWER NOB'15'00' © �r"rcpR`FASS �r.l" ELAE55 coNSrRMCn. NLO MAWTENANCE PURPOS6s ceDICATEO To ,NE INDCArtz NI EASEKNT F. KOESTRIAN I-ESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES FOR THE Ne1v5'DaE TRACT NO- 4928 -1, 144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF VCHNRA CDINTY MATER W.KS DSTRICI N0. 1. OFFERED rOR DEDCAII. HEREON. O HONEO9MER5 ASSWA7- BE RESCRVEO IN -ENTS. 36'S9',2'W LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 CATFS CEN%1ERUNE . AN FASCMCxi FIX1 PUBLIC UTKITIES 10 z.CF. R 9DCATES A -EMENT OR STERRD TO EPAIN INGRESS AK EGRESS, C.STNUCn. AND LASEME IN SERSO F. THEE CITY OF MOORPARK F. PUBLIC N AIABCN 21, 1 N B0. AN I PALE 3,6 Q CRSIGN RECORDS 1CMOED E DEDIANANCE PURPOSES, F OTY IX NOW I, OFFERED F. O 0 OEDLArIAN NFN RP HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC uBLE W10TH EAAMENI FOR III UD1ITrcz, IFORU IRAN. IN-11 NDICATES A N.- BUILDABLE RE-TED USE PER MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5642 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL. 2000 ©A LRES�C.SINU[TI. AND YNNIENANCC, LANDSCAPE AN) iRNL MNNTENACF O 118 CT[ NO 192B OYCIXtPABK r. NE1 40DFIUD. PURPOSES PER PURP 5 OINTED TO THE OTY IX NOORPARK. OFFERED FOR DEDCAn. NENEON . -x „' MR )' SCALE. r = 60 SHEET 9 OF 24 SHEETS M p� 7 n 8133H8 ilZ 30 il 133X8 •O9 - 1 3ro8 4 133HS 33S cClt MBLas•9.N OOOZ 71HdV A3AHfls 30 31V0 ZV99'6'1 VOVNN3)1 V 13VHO1W 'ONI'83130NV 801 S31VIOOSSV ONV H3NVSNf1H pp S1'0BN 61 6''16 3.DDS..6SN BC' Lb an 2 1oVN1 JLTVA VL HW M'3- 8361'ON 10VH1 30 V 10l ar9z M.6oslAen s y!� 1852 m ..IBN - wa°'"a '•%tee cx, .wl M.00POA6N +a .. 30 NOIlkIOd V ONV E9 HW 4Y11-9361, *ON 10VH1 "H a "sF: \ice•. pOr OOSI,BON K, 10 -= M.00,0DA6N Cd 3P09r•lBH ''6 \9 .M-•ly •f 30 9 ONV Lb 810130 NOIlHOd V ONV 0 ONV 0 8101 r •oD .1 m =e'I 4.60. = =.wN za xl1.60a ._- "p6 'S ��9.6. ,k• 6612\`, .Z ONV M HW E'13VHl 311311VA 3H130 BS ONV VC 'M �l�.l dIH NO 6y�/ a o 1W NOW3M1 S — OBSLt \•� bS '8Z '9Z 193 'ZZ lZ S10y�1 �3/10 NOLWOd V ON138 a b Lu If 3.zc,a.ux z, wb '.xc 4.vL /rA1x B" ,9 e s H a m VIN H031-lVO d0 31VIS u 11N3A d0 A1Nf100 Nn w e3 }ryytxLN teH� �a - m Nn _ '1HVdH00W d0 A110 3H1 NI lot9t sr �y.tl � W9rA1 ;• _ti _ l L19 E —Mt, "ON 1OVdi R � L9,tl — =-- :sty e. g`s � j co ze -L9L w.9L.9w, - o c.fi "• zx y,\a 3 t\ys,61 H o 'roe °yrz.l .� -i N 0 DoS.a 3HS &, 9'Lrl -1 .00r6+.tl ZZ 13 Q 33S '1tLZ __ ., i. ✓` 8913 6t t2.9LH .LSk( - C7 `'' •`• 3A/8o tea. sY, 4'i- - ... .. /+. IC •l Z . .... .:. ). z. \ i a'� M.f•3 Li ��� .1 DO�Stl p2 ;. -_� .P IL xo0 P •Bi�+szo .9e'w =��- 1 IS ,•._�`iq (/m p�$'�- 3.53�N. 1 ^'�T r'zN `D ro'L •o0 v[9 4j "L msr.ei•e��_' 96�\L)c01Z•51" a o lLI13033s n ofi(l [il .._ Bb OtiBL9�tl � L \MPZq �\SyrdA ,J eb° l8 yii s� Leh [k' �8v � .BYZ 000[S 0 .s[[( -; 81 hg,,.- •`?m � 1 '1s� `•'-�J ._._,.. aSot� qd, y I aa5[vs o. '.. -_�(i5 "..: X91 M t]y Le tz= =-- _ -' 'ff'11•S[N B6p5.6 266yM 6 � .g f' B 'siJ Zm'S -•-=. =[006[ Mtl POtI LS BaL•l r6_l '• `P S z q :I _ — "L'L9 �'H .. 1d l) L 00'Z .l`.OI.fL .a'. '�''g J6j;9sOL ,rro3 .•oSg$'3\ 8'4'Sd'._ -� 'r I MAO.00.O6x 3�3 0002 .6+.sZ.1 w I0X - W SBf •tl 6$,N $y �'' nB .h` ,... '6CX0[6's.l O;6' '8 .(OZLAII Z] . ,,Z L0.1 IA oo 9Y6L.3 .,,�, mn rrxr'bti 3' b °q .`,A.[ib Df( 5\fi3'LL a os KL.1 D N• 3S0.1L.rN >ti_ Otl6 0 4 l s 8v Po, •OVh Y �i 4°• A 6 . 1.9L G3 :a ,�` .L o SL s, , .cSzS vivo qq'"Y _ �i �,.�.LC ••' • 'A $, . s I K..90 n ° j•z w9 . ro,s9Z9a h � O S -w..a «.LBx .oszt -.. _. ca_w .� Z ,.0 ? UxS 1• 8 ? Sg ¢�a.Y spa 9 y tom' --.- .0052 °a b di��A .000[1 .L1.61.LB ..�0� v Y " ' °4' B m ", "= rrsr'aih .: _ e<cz.6.s %•` v IS L9s sr,LO.LO n m R S6 8 )L.o.z + orA 'tP C '^• .: = _•••. % ?'D,9S SCL M.00.W.O6N 'Y" .SI,9L.r1+! ��f6y4' w .00 GC BC.9S. CL _ ulDNn 0s ar 3fa pP _ ea 'o• Y1 _ T'v16's =-•m . aH_ -N _ '�'I __ f45 b au aNJgb,YYnNY� UaY a = _ - -,s A` m �W 4 g) Atl .psi n ",' " ?• g„ as.y 3o rn'69. 3DVa 'LC'z HO a 10 "• / m +. ¢ _ 3 m rr �/ ua '".ov,.,. -8 O 6v1fa3OYN �Z96 NmJnv603 S96 tle33 '9 m 'P `� b a 3DYd 11 00 1 9 tl0]]tl 0330 31 S b03 NOI1Ya —sons NO 1 1333 0 p pry. ya. - xzsii:sN -'.. N l0 %ii OvS -_- B' i't ` , �q`o E .y .a,$ NI a3+Dtl3s3tl Sr 'VDOdX38n5 0 330 3 30 33A DOS JO •, / :A an- •. 2 •g •lyd. -__' ly5pyv.6LH L Oyy 'M.BLgi 01 N56��de �$ 1d0301H91a03Ni nOU1W. n9 133— lY3tl OYS tl30Nn _ (h' y _, -6CSC• I-,: `::- __.yr ___ - -_ - --= q— - - — — — / --- - - - - -- - - -- lONY IDNV Sln— 3d SV53". 11 .1 3-aONY _ - -3 _i.Ci.♦ N / �bdw _ _ NY '831H WO SYO',a DI Sr 33Mr0 uO d3 W.brbi— 15 OS 6 V d W I 8 KSS.1B H O'330J3 '3 A318IHS3lSIS ,r.3]3N ONY 33 0 .�A 4 U MLf S -LC 1 .Oy= ,__..> _. ZY69\•l .- ONV 11 .o5.66[`� g,'p 89r,w B'v �••S mn -L aN9\ ,�_ v. oOCT I`dQ fOK' 03�_ 'ff V.•'JS1P.__�, t vB5 •M h6B \B 3,9L,9C.68N 5 sObOJ3a lra 33o 300Nr 39ra'SISJ oa -� L\ 3�— HtrOr , o[y�� iS w.LfN- - B� - -- ��3 15LH i' »BZ.9f `9� ,09[91 ,4 '•[+CS L. N� - -_; bn NO J0Hld30 tlO1L'f03L3H3N30tl ] an58ns b033JV38n 533X10 8 �9 1 :. a 31 '� .0. 1.X01 0 V 3 Nn a0 NO 'N �; . S. - - -_ Poq vJ v LJ 1Sl i 6\f9f P /I « 8•' •• • 'lq ,lY _� _ RL�.6L � M; dd_6LM, a NI tlN--= a H ONV Sv9 15NY aee35 H- 3N0 >0301nIONn nv 30 E13WA0 1N333a, °fix' 10IWH]5 N11 rav N111 53ta130 NY `O' '�q' .W 00Z -b 9L511LA (13]WS _— LB OCf e0< AVW D30D�O— .13D N D-1138 SY S133�3 0SS 30LHid30 Z5G , _ - -- 8. k r 101 1NOIb ANY LlaHl'M9 B 0 3lY0 WSS 30NIaIldad —NI 30Xn 'NI ONV NO S-3NIW DNV S -1581S .—DO.. b3H10 !+.BSb60q 'JY 9LI5 ONY Wn310b13d 'SVO '310 11V 01 ONY NI 1sb3- xM V •' I ''I ,.,q,6 Sf.i lo•, 30 Stl3NM0 1N153tld '1S3bllNI ONINIYW3tl 31 Ol SN'3314 6S(L Z.b ONY ON—nH a31SIO 'A N48H1Ya ONr b3I- l 3JNIA ONV - 153a31N1 %L9'9L V( Ol WY3 013d 31 30 S331Snb1 -O3 '013d A10800 ONY Ol13d "B D-- +153b31NI x[9'91 Y O1 SY '1861 S= A na933 O31V0 1Sntl1 A,IWY3 3=3 '> ­r 3H1 30 1S— S, t5 31 ! S331Sn1 -O3 lN3330 30 L 3OYd '6361 HO 09 DNV 'SI . S—S .L[LOtf b38W310N 03080J38 0330 bad 1331 005 30 11-8 -- 3AOBr 3JV3tl158n5 tlD 3JV3an5 3N1 Mtln b31 N3 01 1H .608659 M �i.9L.6B N H1M11ne 'ONYI 01Y5 >0 NOi1bDd v ­Nn ONY ONO _ 3Nm aNV ­,D13 N111111 xoeaY >oaaH a3Hlo axV 3d 5V9 '3a 30 YOS 10 0— —S3ad 'B 1 II S­31-- 81661 N331S,0 N A003d 3H1 30 331Sn& 'N33LS,0 'N ADO3d 'V '8310N 1N3W3SV3 drn NDISWaens 3N1 3o U>(c)ro) 9c +99 11113s ONY X30NI 30N3H333H OH003H 'dVW X30NI D --Obd 31 —Nn 03111.. N3]s —H 6a,Nr....S NO` Y>Oe b310 b0 'S 133HS ONV AHVONf109'1N3W31V1S Wfl1V0 NI sl -- m Sb3N40 0 -01103 3.1O3DI5]a 1YNDIS 311 'SDNIHV38 30 SIM H03 Z 133HS 338 (S310N NOISSIWO 38flLVN0I8 4 as l s F ? � A SEE & q > SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS W 1 :2a "" 5 DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET `, N mQ.IA n w00'!z- SEE SHEET 8 "I �QF' - - - N09•'S'-E 9BO INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND �P _ - - - - �1e1 "' R-57" EASEMENT NOTES u. u9 `"1 � o-zei5 z• � o _ _ — — _ �O�'� / �zso.zi5- ]s - L_ _ _ / //` .- - - - - -- ,_ -- xxx —_ ]51. SypF OF/, __w 00• d.l!•I5'oo' •]p'00'[ 82' n5)saa , -t]]sY f s r4 A tiFR e.. DRIVE ~�;'''e'Po' - Nefi 000E B,�_— zp9 P \ONS „:9 00 fpH VE ws]•IS.Ir '� P �. W _Neeh]a'W b e015'00'W .-T" x 9500' C"01 o,. \(2 a0•W'.0'W ]I']]'BZ ar_psa6- '•sm.LOiMR RN''BOY 11 ] 95 /L .V''3 W.. r�.J6'� 'lP1 E`•- P),'(P/ M]\`,YOf� l9 III s' C> j'' -/� I•IT28' '%'SS•E •, - -_.. [}] —i_ '\', A9. 5' - 1 E, 51)5' ,.✓' -�.-:� 6.]5' N01'4Y4,_W_ .R N11• �-{� C3]— . "�A+ =. �_N 11.09' W N],B.]5_ �� — -- �� -1 %l X�y a• 1')''] S Tse f -0.A0 P +1"19 ft- 380.50 L 1 -� ']6 - ] L',3155— _ LOT H p�yq� PbY�'Nj1'271i /. 15C3 C` 3,. — Sr�.]g_ _ —V�._� E16�`>`�p9� -- MIl•06']9 �-i-� - II �— - -- 1 - - B �.� N�•a; se:. er1 ; • J.Q _ _ _ R L o N oa'>?EA weozOaww %:- B R=z�. A N1rw'!9•wVal, .z9]i J1 - -=• 61�_aolao — — — — — d N5s'2BJ3T ) 3 3 !�` � —,r+e• R.9eow i.11 (RRrv.r� S�ttr� �%o.00• :91) l,zfifiol It F— m1, —•9rw� "one. ; aa'�° \,;E G — _ ��- �Po o. ROAD �. s N6s_Ie'>rES ,IZw a eo. �9s9 _��6� /,a5e/ itw6) �' S vos•aa'xz — _ B•oe•ol $- B s4 r \ 112 ttl �4 a _- 110 109 108 r r�P _ e3�! ?••J _ 6 3 ru ({: tr19'18'1e CNAMPIONS o . \ - -,-a, 2s no _ . ]6• n 9' r y f w >9 w'91• W a a=i I�IP 4 `u'w a; eu'.._ 9789• — _„�•s' ORIVE .,� �' \ " --- trz9•ss,i N- no.00 —1 o9a.^ti hab,� N m•as'S9. w Na•m'n'w m6r —' Pow 1 m.,; 6].91' _ '✓ 10 \'P, iSS.OB1f - H1Y1 WS- .� 2 W �\\ 1W4z' N852853[ `35 W1N Y yt,•S,l'QO 62 „ flt• _NO•>e'irE a,b•—r 'czJ v � 1W N19•a',rE ° _. ']ii:.r :kj. �<c. 09 � se_sb_w kin '. R-elao' - \ .. - ]9.or ""x]1•orvs•w W, i \•; .. ` •E .ei 4. !fia — y aos•zrs1� R- res.ao+ :1.06' ; " z>.5s' o %�:k ,6 •� _ ]qx' -� _ °al.3i)o. W ••`G.\ s' _ 12'SO:W Np }!Sy Q- -.. N8J•SB' — -- 1- da0s'z1`SZ]S DETAIL '8' \s 5, .�• "in vcc`;, .5 ,ye ]? J s6•w ea —s.' —�- \�___ h'� W d; r w - 1 y, x J Y ., b �?e° i99.00 �e..I co p0,Q s \&46•Bi 23 ,.xv0.�q $�R] 21-1a'21- 0)RnO US xc ,• \�. 4. n se .'7,• ; ';' .d _Ne.l�.u.r_ ' . " ". ^ \ •v5s '•• vi :v S. �'' )PSO— _•,y_ ,, w. c 'Po• L ^08, i /. \ %3 2.•IS'2r 1,1 m' 9919 °P`�N S'. \ 48.;,• •; — — — x 9\y �' Na.Ye }A.;fi — .. %. 110.49 1-1 ; c }/ zrz9�]s, ia9.�. • •£ `$ 4�. I.f� y' N)g•12'tr LOT G .. r, 155 %q OEft LES LENO)x - ,C'�\ cN 11'1651' 102.50' fi0.44 h.(p \. ".. "...1,'cao ' i \ —_�W 105'4r 211 n0' 465' c)5 08'41'18' lt)50 4915 $ Ab:�y. „lY]5'eew -f C;1 t 6: -;y �N 21Y w _ — N]9.151Tw /� �)B "// cae '51'18' SI.SY '• .w.1!' '} c. 64.5601' 3150 16 Dl $. a 1; I .- \ �/ 0)•5)'04' 400 68.55' Cl] 58.5 JB 4150 48.88' , 's. ?e' - -._ _ _ -� NI4.2915'W `,p/ T / // C]0 %•56'41• 4.00 69.50' E w Cb 19e'S ie 41.50' 14. 5,•Si 49P 1-. \1800 qy- � -' \ XND R.R.C, -' T .j, C31 —'5Y 4.00 Sz.a9' ' / / /-• d Cl9 9T5949 13.50 )9,16 10N> y „l0'011i E "e'9' �• s0' %' \ \ ;Y / P°`�' C32 41.41'19• ]].50' 5.15]' cw 45'Ir 6650' 12.91' b; °_ ]0 j1. JJ• .[. R,4�p.CC' \ \2 ay`4. de.y h'J IS'4B'0� 19900' NBe' ^ uz 4slr zi �o w . i •t :.I 'i .x a` "69.9]. 1 / ;��w / /J/ CURVE TABLE .L 'h`6. •`. /I H � ]M' C41 511.50• 184 / .ry:� ccE 31- RAE11 LEN- } 9,'�`apC ba'.: °SHEET/-"-------` h>0. 18 a,- I 1 BI4 ��'i./ oe.`1 / Ica /.�;�0 a� SEE = LINE —1. 2 —141- UNE p� gt i 1 c3 w•w'1.- es.5rc seer -+ c' / .c v9 `ero''i. N9 arE TRACT NO. 4928 -3 1)9.00' / �o � -� O rv8 1 N69'01 WIN 350' '0',1'561 555. `5 �'o B D 4 N70 -M 14E l9% 15.11'40' 00• 92r /�•' � .Nti �' p0E HIS Sa M a' IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, L5 N19'01'46W 1.50' N0- N35'tz'OS'w o .1 g�0 roPo'1e o9 �' Lb Ne9•]r321 a2 e6.4]n 414% 9. \. -- -x si COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ao.)e I aP\8^ ]. y� �',°F = s]se N.•t5,w.w ''00' ao 7r1>i1.5i s2. o' 14.1.61 \ -Y 4igg., dP;".o^ . BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 26, 28, 29, 30, • .lw` . •' \ NBO IS'm' nal 11.av ❑1 9'IS'sr S6.w' 11161 \ c+��'Y' o.k J] a \v %• sm•E 4.ee C11 -195r 41.Sa .4Y \�__01'lo's -_N6J' r y 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND \ SY h�t4W^, icy] p3 190• N04.21' %•w 2419' C3 •]5'Y' 00' 299' 9:11• 4, \rE w.oz: e9w n.>e' m9rtr a• �.or si'% "BD LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF i46'w 12 as 1415.50' 1o5 P69•]i OR\ 146.28'.6' .n . 46'w nss �•.x \ TRACT NO. 4928 -1, 144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF '' \ N5N \P N19 I'll n� as�5sso 3356�i. i i P\O s x1a>s'le'C 3+66' LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928-2.144 MR 74 DETAIL -A' ne BSV1'1, 263.Se A16 \` .) lc C•N xs. x • %'srE n9 9s•m''4 e.se' 1 ,9 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES INC. L48 N291',1'4eE C20 95.0141' 8.50' 14.10' N2s,srleE %1 oe•u'.4' 263se' as9 MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS 6842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f = W SHEET 5 OF 24 SHEET$ { j l � I i SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES — N e9.191: w LOT F 26 Bc 0 o 8 — mm•a'09' S69so >9s0 -�1. - _ of 5°• __ )) -- %g I] � _R- 550.09 ��Nry,y•�JI�,M�W 10000 N)J•29'0\ w _ b013'1l L- —�— x02'1�L5 "� R 't �30'W - - o so'i - - r - x19•SrJe•w 30.5!'/5• � _ n s0�°j'wq 9.z0•s�y5. -- — X R. "- L 2)7. M' — — — — _ — — — — er�)1.E ie9 sr LOT [ — —�- K 1'59• _ E � °\ W' _<<5, -i- �� x01'21 \52 31118 _ — 1— — -h� r _ _vst" -- o-arz9s',' - - ='2; 613' 4' Sq�: b30•SJ'S 4r 1.43.81' xe5'Sr\i - (PIBVBR49E E59 \.19' RaLB 950 L` :�$ .'Q� ;$ AfMER Cr 05.3ri: E I°6.fi1' �]B.L— GO L- 391.58' __ B x — - - -0-— s� aR,-- __C—_ __ --a —_— _ -- - - - - - -_ - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- - D :N5_CO'Rx0 a .,• B r n A sg = e8 a o _ o o w s a\ a u e 15 s 18 s 17 s o) 7 n s 12 g $ a 8 9 0 a �� w IV a W n a �F- m y m� x / ,J' x85.10'39' E x 03'53'53' E 9162 x e1'S9N [ ' N)s•r4 N)5y1. H 05.31'4H 0449 Breatr w x era: or E j'? w\'�d^ x9 w M'W B '12 a 9 E 9r � � bOfixR 1$ d.09'SB' ON SNRi ri� x eesar w 9fi.56' r w 9e.00' LOT D 3918 A0. — — — — — Ro913o00, _-- - - - - -- " 35. 9 h H•A R- NJeS50' 3 _ J _ "�AN•b �y,M1 — — — — — — — — — — _ _ — _ N80',5'OU•IY 16 — — � ).>°' /] wb - i - — — — _ — — — — — — — — — x01'3900'[ ]e.].ez _ _�� i 400m xaru'00•w m _ _2- - - - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - r _wes•3o oa E em.00' _ _ R- 578.09 -DAI - DRIVE 1.69.69 x ` Ne0•,s'00'w CHAMPIONSHIP p9'E 83549 0. 1:113.81 22— 16:.81' - mu•15'00• R --s L 151.]° SEE SHEET 4MWEN1 tAOLE ' 5 LINE ix &[ T-1 cuRVE .11A L1x x0 us cix —14r 8105 LER25] u —1 4r 105m' 2n m °ro'.w oo50 X221 5] ofi•4rsr 10100' 1210' .91149 9BOO 6 9 no —1121 1609 nza 159.5)13' 6500' teE46' jc .;�• bqs. B °s � '✓ W O SEE SHEET 7 �p� `' Vp� a �• TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 6EY1 I,xE 9uRixc 1cNCi Ps Nua•u:0.5' ��a x WE o x0 I xo AR 1, 3s'OST 5 z was v1cE ]..30' .2 ]9.55:1' 25.00' C1J O2.OP22' 255.50' 8.15' 13.03'22' t01o0' u11 �� s O - :ty tE� c .! _; `b Y B D BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21. 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETfE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND 110 X00•]5'0.5 "[ 1.)6' pl, L3 H0411'41'w 50' ° x09•a' 4m' 1:09']T tOB 50' M.81' m•ss'1o' 119.00' tsm ^8;8 ? o; °A+ �o >d_ b`?e W "+ ;� LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G.7 AND 8 OF .� yr --ml 1771 a•3sml t.76 a1RK aRxEi E 09�5e�.: ee Rileea' LE�es3' m•m'tr so0' i.u' sps DETAIL "A" xoT io SCAEE �;Ws ° °�c..w $: DETAIL ��8" TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 Xw•3s osE a 2r1e'2e• 'e00°.m' NOT To SCALE HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INO WE MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f - W SHEET 6 OF 24 SHEETS SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND SEE SHEET 8 EASEMENT NOTES. SEE SHEET 8 - -- _ - 1442•.7sw '° _j4 155 L E 57 -3 - - 091508'2b560 .0' O0J' ' AV 'g r Nes•2e'3rE Ra.w as`4 m y D Z �J D B q$ e a 81 80 bs?I O 87 D B Ysww ra n pE it e R •yJy a. r 83 82 E r B' zy a 84 87 88 3 o B 6 1D7 I, 'EOI r II •i r •_ £ $ 9.2552 "w 6.3Y w N LLI W N 65.26'3. 0) �-N\ f 165'8 D SEE SHEET 18 xa9.25'srW —; I � DETAIL A g?I k y F N L� ' E X 15.21 19755 N86.2fi N [ SEE/ <4RNE ve:-aw i N86.28NE ,sa3o 94s1' 9: xr 9N \X12 F.RC' -v .t= — A= BS',56' g• x gVNI6 4 502��i _ � — NB6'26'J1•E— — tt� ]2 " � 6.68•.5\J9� � \ \M. �. R NP�pRC. 1sa. v. l5 �\ s SHEET 18 x52•: ; +.r�, --' - aN4 LOT G R a•3].° . p \ a 162,977 LxE iNBL[ - ®��� Ohm•' , m ®gym 0�� mm•�® m�mm ®gym• ®� 0� 09murimyrm ®��� ®�mm x2799. 9 v191 's g x l a g IP 88 z I X33;51'26 [ 79 2°.54' 26.w' sa' D tlB I m s w x P255 49 � W La �La 2129Y - N H00•N'O5 "f N 83'5Y1fi [ X6.23' $ 4• 89 e 79 45T 64rE_ �, w N IljPm N1 ti as ",p2oa,— ax6 8 5iE \ ::•- Ntsz SEE D B `° \� \, '; 3 SHEET 17 Sp•w TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 28, 29, 3Q 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS 0. 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f . 5U SHEET 7 OF 24 SHEETS •b'm• - wo.w _ _ L. _ ^4 "e<POOOO.W -: Na6'XI'0PE ]6).83• � � - _ r N& °00'00' " - N9PPo'00"W IJ026'y ^ N Nab•0'aoE m646' . .; D DRIVE ' 's= _ = =''s" Q�y:. M 2114 1 1112.1 X001' _� g g b CHAMPIONSHIP • w : 8 -OP-- �t350.Po' t t =22J.61' N N &•00'00. �:.. Np P.R.C. S ,' S09'J6'll'f R . -ww P - - xa6•JO'00'C " ".:; 83518' .._CSt _ -21 �' _ _ _•• � _ � CI6 .. S 299.2Y� r _ - __ — —- - -csl_ w - - -_—�- -- - R P r�I.•,tr_2'02'20'I — A _;v _ s N =.a � �e�trltr5b's]'53•s - , — 8 01 — _R2­'7' 1 _—�---�A ROAD - R e °pc� � N62_ •zz2ra5_ 3 o' , - - -- - — " NPS'29'33 " e1Y � " LOT M M .960 — 0 N50'S6� f00p 0 _1 - NELSON - - - - - - -�- ,E SmEE,) . es•xa n n"E sa6Y - --y>_..SO _— -- o .m L-14 0 'w 66.]6' 6.05'IY06'R 019.50'1- t tOt.l6' 1442•.7sw '° _j4 155 L E 57 -3 - - 091508'2b560 .0' O0J' ' AV 'g r Nes•2e'3rE Ra.w as`4 m y D Z �J D B q$ e a 81 80 bs?I O 87 D B Ysww ra n pE it e R •yJy a. r 83 82 E r B' zy a 84 87 88 3 o B 6 1D7 I, 'EOI r II •i r •_ £ $ 9.2552 "w 6.3Y w N LLI W N 65.26'3. 0) �-N\ f 165'8 D SEE SHEET 18 xa9.25'srW —; I � DETAIL A g?I k y F N L� ' E X 15.21 19755 N86.2fi N [ SEE/ <4RNE ve:-aw i N86.28NE ,sa3o 94s1' 9: xr 9N \X12 F.RC' -v .t= — A= BS',56' g• x gVNI6 4 502��i _ � — NB6'26'J1•E— — tt� ]2 " � 6.68•.5\J9� � \ \M. �. R NP�pRC. 1sa. v. l5 �\ s SHEET 18 x52•: ; +.r�, --' - aN4 LOT G R a•3].° . p \ a 162,977 LxE iNBL[ - ®��� Ohm•' , m ®gym 0�� mm•�® m�mm ®gym• ®� 0� 09murimyrm ®��� ®�mm x2799. 9 v191 's g x l a g IP 88 z I X33;51'26 [ 79 2°.54' 26.w' sa' D tlB I m s w x P255 49 � W La �La 2129Y - N H00•N'O5 "f N 83'5Y1fi [ X6.23' $ 4• 89 e 79 45T 64rE_ �, w N IljPm N1 ti as ",p2oa,— ax6 8 5iE \ ::•- Ntsz SEE D B `° \� \, '; 3 SHEET 17 Sp•w TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 28, 29, 3Q 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS 0. 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f . 5U SHEET 7 OF 24 SHEETS ®��� Ohm•' , m ®gym 0�� mm•�® m�mm ®gym• ®� 0� 09murimyrm ®��� ®�mm x2799. 9 v191 's g x l a g IP 88 z I X33;51'26 [ 79 2°.54' 26.w' sa' D tlB I m s w x P255 49 � W La �La 2129Y - N H00•N'O5 "f N 83'5Y1fi [ X6.23' $ 4• 89 e 79 45T 64rE_ �, w N IljPm N1 ti as ",p2oa,— ax6 8 5iE \ ::•- Ntsz SEE D B `° \� \, '; 3 SHEET 17 Sp•w TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 28, 29, 3Q 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS 0. 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f . 5U SHEET 7 OF 24 SHEETS x2799. 9 v191 's g x l a g IP 88 z I X33;51'26 [ 79 2°.54' 26.w' sa' D tlB I m s w x P255 49 � W La �La 2129Y - N H00•N'O5 "f N 83'5Y1fi [ X6.23' $ 4• 89 e 79 45T 64rE_ �, w N IljPm N1 ti as ",p2oa,— ax6 8 5iE \ ::•- Ntsz SEE D B `° \� \, '; 3 SHEET 17 Sp•w TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 28, 29, 3Q 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS 0. 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE f . 5U SHEET 7 OF 24 SHEETS v t s P, - �--- N 09.26'2 W 6598 °9 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET LOT F- INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND fl126 Ac ! '_ °R EASEMENT NOTES _ _ _` — _ — — — x 6VN W W wa.a6 _ — — — — — — _ _ _ — — — — — — E-1M 14' LOT K _ 1.1581' — (rftrvArt stxEEtl N'S5'W 1I0.5 Y — �ss_osoo• J9'°3'a9• N79•]I'J6•W �' R- 56 ] ��, 6 -1J'Ob 3A- 6v -55 _ a168 AC. 'a _ Na9 1I v'W 2)0.51 1 6 - DRIVE 9• °2 10q _ _ — — _ °j N29•!I' Op _ _ — — — _ — R !6_w 100.°0' o-u•sg'v' ft -Seaso c -+s1) NtY16'J1'E ) •[ _ 9.1] — — — 1) — _ 10— 1r1a ER " „ � N 9too� — - NxtT1°`" -Y— N>g•J1'36'W a •1r59'v' _ N =,00.00' C 6°5_8' J•al )T �_ _ i '� � b : rg � ° _ _o- I�`� ab rx.,1' ..10i 1r _ ---- ------ -- --- -- - --- — — — — — — — - - - ---- -- - - -- — ri - --- -- — — — — — — — - -- - - - -- - ----- - -- - -- — — — — — — — --�\ —�� R 18 n 19 a 20 s 21 ry � $I 22 ^ �I 23 s 24 25 = 26 y a $ H sa uj w a) 27 ,,,''a x a9.36'n' E 9,.m' x 96•u'a6' w 9..90' x ee•w:o-w 0 I ;7 nes•2s n-E - 97.2' -_- , 14Ta9'e efisi a� .dip 44� 6 _ -� -' Jz x 66•s6m' w a]s9' gz- ----- LOT D h2rb.l NCPo'+ -_ . f TAO vv w ae a-R - ='w -- 12 -_ - ST2J• ��•— w 11 -�--------- -----_ e -09'!0 W N- Ia12.00' L•2J5.)9' ._ — — — — J.91e AC. _ .- ems, y--_ N "1. ✓N4.]5695TC `C.'e. N l6•]6 _ _ 609'M'00' ft= e- 232.IJ' 1.116 JJ N &bOQOW' - _. _ - -° 1AC0.00• __— ___— i— R- ➢7' •i°1.a2' e - a•0000' 00. 6' 860���1 _ —_ —__� - •l,1 — — N9°'UO' °U W Il°.26' 1 — — — — — — — — — N9R°°'°°'W 16a71 — — — — _ _ '- e - 61'°°'p°' _ — CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE <• \, S e = 09.50'00• R =uso ao' C- 123ea' \ N &'00'00'W R. 1- ,09.96' -- 00'00' N90'00'00'W 315.00 R.y�1Po A C•34, pJ TRIACTI NO.04928 -3 w VALLETTE TRACT SEE SHEET 9 Lu x THE COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA R 41 NK E n,R oE,tA cl � 91•Sr,r ft��us , c1N w' Enfi Sa BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 2L 22, 25, 26, 29, 30. Wwoxuual co o'ssEt tA6LE LENC7N 1.1W' LME 11NEecA NC ENCtN I ]5'OS•E 1].50' i1 rNlm•]sm•E !s2' '031J a —s 1r c. w•5121 C5 0,',5'tT 6 a' +6 �9' o s.�.w a.�J�9' —w s 12' 6500' 19 a5' — 6�, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT. 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928 -1. 444 MR 63 AND A PORTION OF L)s. =121. rroo•woorw ;;� R. 6F,0'ar ,r3A1] 6bso' ., 1800' 659 LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2 144 MR 74 `A, ,",�9°•.���. ;°-� ,r3,'2J• --F31-2-3 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. ,r3423- se.co' - MICHAEL A, KENNADA, LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL, 2000 SCALE r . 50' SHEET 8 OF 24 SHEETS 1 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET / INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND SEE SHEET 8 EASEMENT NOTES N90b0 * -26' Fa !, «9oro0'00 "W f 6x74 ----------- "' ��� �o•Po`Poi '.. 315.00' - _- 3 n e =62. —� - OO O DETAIL CHAMPIONSHIP � � � • -, (s<F v1eF7 ,) .' crJVi9 -- ]I 00 G -31'°t 39• Ra \ 15 J5 �S LOTH �______ m� — _____ o «x9.5126E 2fi o. a 5 �m'42-�•' ,? -- - -- s \ LOT M1ry ryy, s➢`. . .W --� NELSON - - 5o� -. � b'.3. x.960 i1`. ��R�ac x0s•41' ' R­11 F -Im ls' °` Ne9•sf'2st Jos.2s' °' _ � �� -9;J6 ____- ______�_ - _- !2.A0__- ______ 191.W ____ ___]4I9 __�_�, k'J4.14'Jr R.4,0 ��_p6. '4� '• \ 26 �O L -12 (•RJ,i 8 R �.y \b • -'pb R.�';9!M" 6� ee 85 84 83 Lu S h \ :'Naf•Je'm•F• „ W 62 0261.41 -.. 1 5126'[ ..- - p °l'. Lu w'lo-w a � N —.'21- W 61.91 h•4.•4 -. Z�.A \ '•i 'RAD'•�2)0.J0` \\ 0P V�k \s � \\ 11 12F NI00'JJ.52'YI 4.Po' 5W is LOT G u �Ao Na: .� Y \ - •et ., -P .- 11WE fi 99• 6fi'SYJ9T 27.63' \\ �• `%. \\ �� \ I " ow o-o9 °m',a 2'• n \ \ Mm•P000w Noo°w •. its S e•'S0• 14 "sry`Gz. p ` l\ ,s —35 34w 2702 s A 3g•• ,y \ S$ \\ . \ . TRACT N0. 4928 -3 sP.. IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK aR , -� OS'S9'S0'E 59 COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA R� 0744 6.19' cl 11.02'x!• R157OO' �J0.49' BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 28, 29, 3Q 12 2J•�� ask (% ..�'Po. �' 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND C4 -0'.n• nano . ao a6•SS'w' scam' n.s cl 9, - e� "\`� s9' LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF 0—'05- 9e°. wi C22 :rJx'9r 15x Po' si 9Y yS" 9]6.50 23.9I' TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF ur:s'2C 2a. r cr Po xr2Pofi sa0.ao' s .6e' "'� LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 N'19'22' ,_ 42 sz.22 �•' "zs Boom e�6 z6 �Fi 05' HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. -2m . MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 as oo 'aow 4'A° SCALE r = 60• SHEET 0 OF 24 SHEETS s � g^ yi 5 LOT F - ;:4N'0s f ° _ 6AC o ,J 11 PE 8PF e SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES \v 1 j r ; xc ue[[ ec!Pwc — Sx'a'E �' aao oo- ..rW y y.[;. Ns 11 2t 51' ,fjzr,ry — 0.l'x9T 1 21e1 /l \ \ ws 122 , o - -Wi -- a z--' ?; / W / — — _ — _ 141 1�' Si W 1616 9,' � (pxIVA1F SiMC7) �� _ _ _ — �•x2s - LOT K e• °x'°rw 9sv' : // Alce ofs 116 ul r _N 31 W +ft 5' LOT E / e» 10 29G , •x9'03 :" � _ / � , tr, trma sY / fr' - n li W K. 34 01 33 $ 32 zu W - a „e!r ,o9e B 8 tus•wsrw � � �tss' w nn i v�� w _ H £ wA�•0P� LOT 0 w 28 , „63 912 _ roW I ' . N 3.7w.9' w " /A' f11 9 - - W _ - P.12e. �x „ 0310 P•TA� p 6 Ndnj1° 55ti H 'S�e9c 310A_T�} 00_ x1ab0'OO w 20 AV -� A x,,,•cP`�a DRIVE P,Y r / / P. W -q d� Nn•'Arr da,ti e•u•w'a°' x21CO'00'w TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, Nzx ;io•W �' i Np21Q�O oll '¢ "• COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21. 22, 25, 28, 29, 30. B 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF i / s8 &8 B'" 8 TRACT NO. 4928-1144 MR 63 AND A PORTION OF i ti88 uaw[NT —1 LOT A OF TRACT N0. 4928.2, 144 MR 74 1— HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE 7 = 60• SHEET 10 OF 24 SHEETS SEE SHEET 13 LOt K PALMER e D DETAIL A b2 N. T,9 DRfW A 35 36 0 4 37 38 2 39 tEr V 1 4* 4", W 91 9796 LO D 1111 Al p -4s.- - - I - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ SEE DETAIL "B" CH�PIONSHI NE P STOM —HEREON --49 02 ow, -.W DETAIL 'A* IL 'A' SHOWN HEREON .:`6. .%Z cob -,LOT m NELSON • -LOTH �K I W A C NZ ---- -------- -'r -_B - - - --------- -2- 1• c.x ROAD c, ---714' Wy 58 27 K2 co 57 W , JP 56 55 R-75- luu - - - - 54 DETAIL B 53 62 T-1 UN[ N -SW w 992s TR� RAD ti TRACT NO. 4928-3 L3 w ,, , 3, --Ll-4. IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK -4� COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA L7 1 3 N-512 E BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 2% M 26.2e. 29, 30, 145 Ni-rml 4 aWVZ XITA ,111 33, -E "'I'V "I" 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 4/ AND — as 21-111 W -1a .05!' LOTS C AND D AND A PORTKN OF LOTS a 7 AND 8 OF "AlUl - .'W' — -W '7*4' 2"' 147 WO.' — I-* TRACT NO. 4928-1 VA MR 53 AND A PORTION OF 141 .-Il 41' 1.1 .' .11 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS. LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928-Z 144 MR 74 10.41 2"' C49 VIVI' 2— lZIll. SEE SHEET 19 BOUNDARY AND SHEET "W _n'-. DATUM STATEMENT, BO ...V• — INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. orprn• s: 9r B5' orlsy, —, MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 6642 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 C53 -2'W' NOTES _1 12 c.5 rm'xx' �7 11 SCALE: T- 50' SHEET 11 OF 24 SHEETS 4 y C, r; SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, / ^ �6R; ; • 2z „ DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET 6i ]B10°' 9686 INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND / = 53B reams o.•w 3c' s�9 w' u.u' EASEMENT NOTES. / o 'so• a / $�Q •Q'aJ• n,.00' s5.os' A. I w,r. aoros 2D• xr -�JZ $v' R i�' *R.°,; '° 'ffi 1 ,•R 73 >o :`.SS] •_,X5.,15 \ �Sw•E W Ns9.OT2TE -., e I' —R D f a 48 ��/ '' ' R,"NE' cee • nw' i r i .1' y - 1B•'sA °"�z60d vs n•w p `” Nngw,si ,;4 e D �nrv,RS/.zwz�, RIVE •D _• -'-�s9 \\ j DETAIL rID o PsHr[w ' . ,• z 9s _- - -- \ - -- 15 ,6w.9d 5. NTS —9 _P ,o ion w2B•.. "c s' RACA 's.c" 41 •. ,& " \ it �N6�� C]0 n.ff Ja C]a <J5 ak� N� -µS A >hll' X11'48',5•[ 49 0 �,il s6.6r 9,p - • \ A \ /ti 3 N c5s ;�;s k'b -o pzl.- 6r "°�� q MR �o-N �i : •; ,J° \ VALLETTE R.R W/_ 40 3•'«_ "__..._ "_- s:a �m s' ' -G' , , �\ \ �. �'h. -N,b :yq•} \ �/ n,s•sep �� ��pu s %R RJR `S, ,e. °� �g b. .5. \ \ 4 W» a�.p>. .,1 \ _ � �/ "i5 ss '' 2.,Q�O °' 8 �, ��'' � a R p�N•� °..•� \Nrh \ \�\'s�RC'y:'sHJr aD rte• \ 3 LOT D NzrJ9'D,t ---- " °//�� N r 'w'oz•c \�\ bey .hsl. <r 8- es3w —y ro.fie' \\ SY H\\ C.D, :: R,p R.>SY \R. /-•;' -�- Fj��?,5� Oho ^'d 063 m� trJT4T2 _�- pi�T °'i K \ ^ "7/% G]• shy \ \ � �,,, , ^'1 -S ;� .,• ��t6�2 s P�'4 p \ �'l'� ,, ] ,629' 1 0.,29 \ \ _ ?� b. ie. 'Y.I• -a_' /', n %', YJI•W II5.06' 8 cJ] j . E ]).6 ,a, 99 yi.� - \ N \ \ { �jf�f ��P. R•>,b 1e�31 A10' IJ3.69' -_ _ .R N3J•STJSW v 6TR�25 _ _ \ .. Ns�] :e2s. q,. 4t• CB> _•.J_— _ y 3550' t !� \ \.6' •F \ N \ >.. R10 c.dRJ °°� \ Z)1•b�' N r19 V S$ SS50• HID R -N.C. h' . \ sS�. `N (qD \R,bb;s \ Cpa 9 Ri �>•F �J. F 35/25. — — � — - c°° n id NW'a3. x,�,'� lME tABL[ ./f. \T. :$1, >!>�j"' i 1.,a 6T _SO rs'• - "- II)W' R ¢ 5. ]9'0JE uN[ N,BT4612'E LE OOV RAD \.. R'N - W ��, HSA•01']6•E _ R )'Cff ------ ffE DE— •A• ry S w 1T , \(� aAU FR.0 /.,; \b, X•06623',2. C .� 2550' _-I!°B•a5'Op'E V Ox SNEE, I♦ Los N—r3ft RAD \ >.p `"4 \,w,. o•\ ,a„ P &,. _ DD'RAO — 2 I6'26aew :s' �6 s N61•r3 - -_ e , Q a�'�j N• R�b'pq;y;E!,. \ J (.lass .i .E aAD �� \q:•, >Wq; >,.- sU3'<.�� .��, z ::a �:•,� - oaTZ:s �3 isaa'w, :8�r�61•,roo'w ,� - -_- 6•sr,rw 1 5 aa• r'4] „°';y >o.� —. _a��9.es'r c.' ^m FOR EASEM zm _ L. ofi•u'oo•E 13'42' 'z-, e .` _ ENr DI ,19' SEE DEi MENSIONS� _ s9 16•u4i w 35.05' �Y ;> AID B• �( 60 N,3.OS'i9'f ? - °'10. 3fk ' iy ., OS °33 g4eDOJ AC. —.Z.•[ °�'19'ID•,.. . -- -d_ � w(R 1 _ - - Fj b A p DN SHEEr 21 DRIVE l6i N6T, VI 22..: N��. `NOl 4 Sf• �1]w R a, 6B' .\ iJ' NBI•r5'OD'., Nao'aD'4,'E n' ,• /� ' °v • 'o LOT '•?E "iq- `ti''� it iw ('s3+ '' 4 .G '_ 'A...'9 xis). 6p 7]re'; - -- Ses.00' is3 Nw•,I'x•w SeS �5• s9 s2 mss.. •a:a- NSK�'-< T .Ci•. \ .w ---. 5 51 e� ti ± m �'y�',if�" �ti ; '•., �,4 _ = R� °NwsA "'A _ ]90 k sscp. v y :sa.s.• NDe.O.s'aoE a'' g' �4.mn< W:: ".__ N.y 1,,i''o`? �'•!,'" !k °. ,� •{ a;'. r0 ° °"\�— — i ,00 �' - iv:.. N �N�S�•1 Pt`.4 (` 6fi N55'D58 b W 2a� �y'�j0 Jr-' -. °X'b,,. d'� •b�6<"d\yeP ,a°�c`. °'L` _ __ i �Px� _ ::,@� "Xx,o,;,ca+o ":,s w• q;s; >Ria.e�Y'a� y9 '.••a: o-]6.3553' _ -_ -_ 3� fie I•Di'z2E D SEE pE EREpN' � °'' 3':.- � b -RAF w e •..; _- .._..,.x-is � L61 N6rO6'42 w JiSas' ro WN H 1Ne . - - _N32•g6.,e z'b r�,.� -_ N6 z3w b. SHp �. • i ,o..q -E � , ...__._ . o-eid.a-�°d ,j; .\.-.c •s„•*nb ...s�S l'�D - . N2>yT,q. v W'" 5D 800. p�: YS ,ti , R. ,,a a rs : TRACT NO. 4928 -3 �X�3• B$. a •'��''°'a Nsi��/ IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, �'7y S yd "' °�i• ^� •• �" COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA •moo :,- s. BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21.2Z 26, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS Q 7 AND 8 OF 8 >.•�g,`•. / '•/1a5p.96;;p? ^'� uauucuT a sEI TABLE VALLEI7E 41 TRACT NO. 4828 -1 144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF +'• `"'v` /sry "•?,fat �w, " _ L'xE �"' L� "5T" $�� MR LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2,144 MR 74 asry P19 "]''zfi1 " 3 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. x Y /51� 9s\,'4 s.11•,w•X' PW N3 . --E 1 ]6' .•xsD / Pn 39•SrJJ-E I.]s MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE T . 5O SHEET 12 OF 24 SHEET$ m�mm� mo��mm� m��mm m��mm m�� ®m m�mmm mr•..cu��xnm� OtR�i�39E�'3� mrsra�astnsslelt� �!!.91R3•fRl59�lRS9� �@:4!.RL4ET:tS9�R:i�i, \ sS�. `N (qD \R,bb;s \ Cpa 9 Ri �>•F �J. F 35/25. — — � — - c°° n id NW'a3. x,�,'� lME tABL[ ./f. \T. :$1, >!>�j"' i 1.,a 6T _SO rs'• - "- II)W' R ¢ 5. ]9'0JE uN[ N,BT4612'E LE OOV RAD \.. R'N - W ��, HSA•01']6•E _ R )'Cff ------ ffE DE— •A• ry S w 1T , \(� aAU FR.0 /.,; \b, X•06623',2. C .� 2550' _-I!°B•a5'Op'E V Ox SNEE, I♦ Los N—r3ft RAD \ >.p `"4 \,w,. o•\ ,a„ P &,. _ DD'RAO — 2 I6'26aew :s' �6 s N61•r3 - -_ e , Q a�'�j N• R�b'pq;y;E!,. \ J (.lass .i .E aAD �� \q:•, >Wq; >,.- sU3'<.�� .��, z ::a �:•,� - oaTZ:s �3 isaa'w, :8�r�61•,roo'w ,� - -_- 6•sr,rw 1 5 aa• r'4] „°';y >o.� —. _a��9.es'r c.' ^m FOR EASEM zm _ L. ofi•u'oo•E 13'42' 'z-, e .` _ ENr DI ,19' SEE DEi MENSIONS� _ s9 16•u4i w 35.05' �Y ;> AID B• �( 60 N,3.OS'i9'f ? - °'10. 3fk ' iy ., OS °33 g4eDOJ AC. —.Z.•[ °�'19'ID•,.. . -- -d_ � w(R 1 _ - - Fj b A p DN SHEEr 21 DRIVE l6i N6T, VI 22..: N��. `NOl 4 Sf• �1]w R a, 6B' .\ iJ' NBI•r5'OD'., Nao'aD'4,'E n' ,• /� ' °v • 'o LOT '•?E "iq- `ti''� it iw ('s3+ '' 4 .G '_ 'A...'9 xis). 6p 7]re'; - -- Ses.00' is3 Nw•,I'x•w SeS �5• s9 s2 mss.. •a:a- NSK�'-< T .Ci•. \ .w ---. 5 51 e� ti ± m �'y�',if�" �ti ; '•., �,4 _ = R� °NwsA "'A _ ]90 k sscp. v y :sa.s.• NDe.O.s'aoE a'' g' �4.mn< W:: ".__ N.y 1,,i''o`? �'•!,'" !k °. ,� •{ a;'. r0 ° °"\�— — i ,00 �' - iv:.. N �N�S�•1 Pt`.4 (` 6fi N55'D58 b W 2a� �y'�j0 Jr-' -. °X'b,,. d'� •b�6<"d\yeP ,a°�c`. °'L` _ __ i �Px� _ ::,@� "Xx,o,;,ca+o ":,s w• q;s; >Ria.e�Y'a� y9 '.••a: o-]6.3553' _ -_ -_ 3� fie I•Di'z2E D SEE pE EREpN' � °'' 3':.- � b -RAF w e •..; _- .._..,.x-is � L61 N6rO6'42 w JiSas' ro WN H 1Ne . - - _N32•g6.,e z'b r�,.� -_ N6 z3w b. SHp �. • i ,o..q -E � , ...__._ . o-eid.a-�°d ,j; .\.-.c •s„•*nb ...s�S l'�D - . N2>yT,q. v W'" 5D 800. p�: YS ,ti , R. ,,a a rs : TRACT NO. 4928 -3 �X�3• B$. a •'��''°'a Nsi��/ IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, �'7y S yd "' °�i• ^� •• �" COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA •moo :,- s. BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21.2Z 26, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS Q 7 AND 8 OF 8 >.•�g,`•. / '•/1a5p.96;;p? ^'� uauucuT a sEI TABLE VALLEI7E 41 TRACT NO. 4828 -1 144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF +'• `"'v` /sry "•?,fat �w, " _ L'xE �"' L� "5T" $�� MR LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2,144 MR 74 asry P19 "]''zfi1 " 3 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. x Y /51� 9s\,'4 s.11•,w•X' PW N3 . --E 1 ]6' .•xsD / Pn 39•SrJJ-E I.]s MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE T . 5O SHEET 12 OF 24 SHEET$ W. W. 52P 87 N W, — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ,p LATE c 'RAO y ) J l� 2f* _ NS P�OTE -FAO FCC � H 81.1yJY .yj C ,�•b , 1 ,'i\ M1 �� \ x yR 46 Vs. Q R-13 7 41 44 L- 2. \4 RAI, `�,` A 46 4 JY // §0 2— �` h 20' \S 42 ni lo LOT E Im- 1� 2. 1� 47 0 01. .12 W 43 TA, ace ft HEREDN Qo Sheer 4p T ol U T '3� c-oEil "4 VE W ...... N71 I (— . 13 ;W O- 2121' I �g 020'* . 19•]1'.0- _W C, %•33*26- 23 76' R-00, Z' c� llele 271W W 11 2-4 C I W01Y 21— 7. a\ 7r25�W 23N 31W -7YT7 21 .' .11 TRACT NO. 4928 .3, m 1-r Ir IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK 10W 1157 DETAIL - — 35* 98 OV Tier COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA KIS .4457 —,. 17 ll BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 2Z 25, 28, 29, 30, 1 02 S'W 2 .11 1IN- j •2 • 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND 1 C72 1 -71 11- 1 .11 1� N01-26WE Ll W l' 14 LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G6 7 AND 8 OF $21 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, TRACT NO. 4928-1.144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF • DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET I Pm 1 s3 11 w LOT A OF TRACT NO, 4928-Z 444 MR 74 E�,2 , INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND L57 .1EW]d HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. EASEMENT NOTES. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5642 DATE OF SURVEY., APRIL. 2000 SCALE, l' - W SHEET IS OF 24 SHEETS {k rq 1 t � SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, .p 8 SEE SHEET 13 1 DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET H.�a INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND ,po 1_ EASEMENT NOTES. I IN In I R: >��e.. we9•o) I m _ Narw'sp-E �j•• I x Z� M 8 �� 4T74 n o Nee•u.rE e I tn� x _wss' al X1a556aE s' ." - -_ N61•e9']rw ---"_..= ", " I _ ti;a� — — / • '�--- �- .o-m269 DETAIL X71.3]'tfiE G' N.?5. -- o(a -zso'j Y M6'SYp+,Nj3 \9E R' Si s:s °.1a1\ ° °d' 29 dp,,M1; 0.65, W NAY 1', "' "i O v Uk m -';•" -I ?bas f - Q�pNS , GNQRNE e� \ }I\ \r� 4• � U 2 r,,v n !yW'r. N>X•27.5 R. "(nJE• Nee•.e'65'E s\ \ \ t 0 •]a't s' a sz a)so lai _4,g .° rs bp01 i To 1 \ ('�$ ''may o-.e•]rsta����' _ ' -R .R•8. � N8_� aH\ \3 �;;..a.`q 69 '2. =��'° " LOT E _•: %%%% : \ ,, HS359. ag DETAIL 'A' b¢J s•o W �g rya:', t,� � ` "y � E , �: ' \cgos ; -9_' '' o rte^\ „��:s�F a «_, s. • y iy \i rs n50v.010 ' 26' - ' � P23SYw -- • -- . _- .- _ '"g y N - X 7e•]sp° E _ -- - -- - 2)65 = \ - 9\ss� a 1629 n . Pd3 w '�g we2'2i t8 E �- _ o-sotrar "P �,\oi a9 : s 5 �' ±S3Y. p\ \ ro•w ee:ro _s w_e6. r. M1 8 P. 0 0 (35 O�p��KF -pN - ."-t ��+.�• ., & J6s.o0' V � - p3� zge ��' °::' CHAMPIONSHIP Bb�� _ _ "- N .N6J•grt.•w - '•.s': >�' , z'7;'+ b� : �•, Rte. S '- - � r��• wE- - n ab.�� -. �-y5= T � ",.�'�,dE DRIVE +9 VE s Nar•lsop ----- yz2J.e.' .� `�� .�'SE�'`(�U��'i''.•' ._�'.�`0 T�U �� - ,, l w J6S.Op N -le. tr56'16'12' _ N- 6 r sY 06pDyl w = .. _.: ,::-" . _ xe— rrs'pp Po; ry _ - - - -zi- ,,_N— rw•—XJ'Po�� C - -- — eA —_ i -9e. �o' __ -- o-trsrar ]n 95 - '•, °aV ,. CHAMPION 3 3 NSHIP tr� w�p � o-29.1a'w• P -e6oar _his' b'••.X15 "i 6E \.\ _ _ xetl 1,05 p wLE J6sop' d'� DRIVE -110 nrPK cuNVf " 91,.ar 7b oEll+ 1+xwws IExc1X tr2r1r]r \ cs 6 ges, use' 8e TRACT N0. 4928 -3 0o:29'tc' >.or ar.31 en.oc per LOT G ' orm' 9nar 1>.er IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK 2977+0, 1 +ems .110r '1&e 21 6 mE PE PN COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �x 31.1f 1. m•x'.o•E Nne BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25, 26.2% 30, ,00,00• 20 m, ] .? SEE SHEET 20 rNlrn'ss w o' Np 33, 34 AND 35 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND nsw' ses m•:r.u• 7aux 16• LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G. 7 AND 8 OF e2.2e,r 5.00' 21.56' X16'53'.1' 1pa lesr NWOWE TRACT NO. 4925 -1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF a�e•oc'�s u.er 2 LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 • xi6•u:i'w HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. 83� oe sr25r MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL. 2000 SCALE f • 50 SHEET $4 OF 24 SHEETS \ :r SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES x 7, SEE SHEET 19 :I A uN anal LENCIN I '1 lx N3rmww 'b W' J 13—N,w NJY lWW s0' ,rE 12 65' LOT G 16 N1 9-51 WE Ab MO.08'nYW 99.95' .l, LB N59.18'0 E x000' L9 N21.32 J'E 89.69 \y,a� W�'Sr �• M1I �I N49•18.03 E 5165' E L10 W Lll 5.12 W1 „6T90' Ltx N29'S2'.6'E W \6 ]xJ iJ' Ab RJ�W /� PNO_ZJg zl ,B m ' " a. ✓ °,' \ I N ]5. 56}g• ''' ow �'�'�pH� ' —22 24i ]]31 fi M'1cY jF"Tite A. _ L1roNt9T'xxJ008 6 rtx.6r. \� \ • W ] 5 ' -� 6sz...1131' 95 ue o 99 t• ,r _N50'Ox'x6'W --- - -_l� •x CC 'g}g.J P RC \O \t�,, H ] $. 96 z �� u' s • N s s � 'a a' \1 Nxl'1605•E— ....__4 - R � �T G %� 8 x Po•C ;i '. N,9. \ x000' an0 �. `Or \ ' , ',p Rnp .___. `.. �� \ \`LY R,jo Ajs•W� `C" -'°a o 102 \' \ 97 �� \` (�•.�iJ >6Poj' fig. H 84 °\`�? 0 �b\ 96 D B 1 \f 4 o � , AK ] BlE LOT G f :.�?. ,, \ `13c g cua ceL9 a41 �ENC]N 119'19.51' S0• 86..5 - - NJ• ( 4 \ \ \ x 55'02'11' 2911a .01' `. - -' :96 A55 �6> �� $O •P•P \\ �� CS x0'.3'.0' 6 TRACT N0. 4928 -3 2 ' \ sags 969Y ,P\' ���� 9,b 0.5. c) s + 6 l7 ?lW4 a 12.56 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK �. eO50 21.' 6 RA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA by c'o 5.6• COUNTY OF VENTURA, <It MYx'W 5tt.s0' t BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 22, 25, 28, 29.3Q $° R.sa' ,,s Y sass a- u.so' xa.e' 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND cu / r 81.50' 2910' V C16 19'.5'1T 66.50' LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS Q 7 AND 8 OF 5 trafi'10 TRACT NO. 4928-1,144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF 1B "" sx•Sx'.x LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 444 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS, 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE T . W SHEET 15 OF 24 SHEETS \i a TRACT NO. 4928 -3 e p s IN THE CITY , S ATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21.2Z 26, 26, 29, 30. 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 4/ AND SSE �'R s,�. O � 8y N\ LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928-1.144 MR 63 AND A PORTION OF \ TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 744 MR 74 LOT A OF ross• = '9Q � HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 \ \ h \q 40 SCALE f 60' \ = n, � �� \ x x5_e'_?�,• / ^ w.- .' o-3o•,i.- n•. - -� __ �� yJ,. ju troe•.,,e 1- S.g, Bspa ;\ yD L =,eu' ^lp v' � �\ � -- Ct� ;� -�R..x'L�w�d ',•! N -:�2, -�. / ,s•sxar ,.' \ \ ` i a4zgJr R' 4 � � � p w • — ':• .� a ,� •• x6e•JSYW- E ro2b' ,w � 8y , �. ,5� h � -JS =9or -� ' �°.a CJ �n4r 4ii o h / ••.� � \ � >5'NS�� J - - ts'd' �, d+t `v L. Q ..JL N •6 - -_� •b , 9g•_,YSYW_ �` :C'r7 V'. Q- M 'Qn _ x b 1!0 z'3V arE95ar W -_ -_- ,` � - - . - -� u• � sraraa �.lJ. •.. E HF Nez•R2, c rl za - ,.µ s� G y, �, i5'R II :g R 8g j s] e'�'i/ k \� •Uo \�k �.. '; " -;,. _Nrr•J'4.5y Y,8 �gl Ayedj troe =-� i•y 19+ F/ �� •t ��,�,�F .50 // I � p _, •j5.00 xsYZIOOE 'd 1 � _� `� \\•`'{7, pq ._�� �' - �: �i� i! j'�\��gJ � — — � :arc 15300 lOT O y - � - a = trp51;7,d ',• b a % %� \ �sz oe �4b z:art _ _ — fi4i '� st �•><. .s�'t LOT G .M `9.n]iA' B 0 •g. 8.1 1 � 8. N- n.o�o� "---- -- _ to £ b J •$- .17 .. N ]'S]i� i rc MOHW[ et OENYI ,ISLE NB EE I� o Lt ref LFb ._.,�NST"o Ne6E 6J,[ ]Yx kb V ,5 E. b�. tr,s•J9'oe N.6vM - axN£ Da,N *� Le[Am�c I[NCr .,y.J. +i a.,y.or. ^ M1 •R) / •"!'?z Oso' xJ s�e2' _ L.,e,.w - m•,YSY , zJ's, z� 9059' 1 •� - wQ cJ 1T51'J9 3,3.50' IoJ.SY N53.1,'00 "[ '•'.'':,�pJl iJ'I �$e 227 122,22 L4 •�. "'M5 .2 sc' x,9.3o',YE f ': Inca �6j �" a.$ g.'�• og C�5 - NST4e'J9'E .� ". 6.'0 4350' S 5- 2N1•,T 'I ,r � .•", x NT°`' y;t ,_••:Y 4g. N7 ct se• R Blr2 9 N-2232 L � 7 b- w c9 1e1W9' ,916' Nla•JS e t trergrui . =' 6y% 53'S� E P 51.50' M2— I IV WI ,1 „' 2 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, ze 9a N29.5Y,e•E n65 '' 4 ' .: •.•y - No ',5'IY e6 DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET w tr N,o•W4u'* _ us N ns �e•se'ss' n3.sa' z ",47% y & INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND n6 Sa•x,r Imw' 6 '73r EASEMENT NOTES , Nm•m'WE 999s LL NSY2�00•C SHEEP 18 OF 24 SHEETS N t 1 � i� SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES, NELSON ROAD H� \} q\ - g�E T p B DETAIL OF i ro i LOT 107 zoo :o. Y � DETAI L'A' s 77 r 71 iP OL R'3• _� Rbgr u 75 ra >1 �O B p 74;� . H 05!'55 "E - P C.C. tD s ^ �F 72 TRACT NO. 4928 -3 73 a. IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA f BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, P p5•JO'etE 33,34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND p LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF " "'�>sw -w n•J�'O E TRACT NO. 4928-1,144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF .� LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 1111141 aE HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. !i x,nm•�sw MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5642 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL, 2000 SCALE T . SO SHEET A OF 24 SHEETS k 7 � 1 � I }, 3 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES 3 ; CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE _ i CNP,p DETAIL "A" NTS LOT 1 ,5117 AC. N / LwE ,AwLE I I I I REAamc I I I I NII N13 .'w 1 n_v'o0 E I I I 015 1 2r00'w I I I 2Y00 w 121 N>5'13'00 [ �1 c N1'1Yao w 122 u,:1r00'w cl ry LL225 N E L11 11-11 0w « „ IN 121 N07•1215 w - ?I I n x 4 . x1.-WW* � m I €I F 1: • 1 I x. m• I I I �L, N11 oo I I /,� Lv x1•,soow m I I I/ i SEE DETAIL "B•' v r,SOOw 4.00 I / ON SHEET 22 FOR >. N75-15 WE 7.w i / /�J i EASEMENT DATA v N2-4u E 110,52 ss mw ,m V \, .11 lrw 401K 1. rvlr00• 2rw 41 V o0' L. xosV t R:r d .v N.n•tr2E 14.Q II 5 .I Nso•n,w'E 2.71 1 �II s Ie- ,ev',: _.. rvi5�rot � ns I �52a2 ia s. s N 31' a'f 14.4 w .2•1r00•E 1x.s1' rya I - �•SY 1.161s1 SEE DETAIL "B" l HEREON FOR g � m �"8 EASEMENT DATA ✓ >/ 1 m P \ONSN�P 1 ry�o R SEE DETAIL "D" 'SS -- AT LEFT w uso. • R .1'03'00' I R :sn n' L"5 DETAIL D NTS 115 p h� LOT A s Ac. SEE DETAIL "A" °-a�, o��'a w......KC HEREON B Q �a.a. •ry,sY „c L - l iA1 / P � i V 'ut DETAIL "C" �P 1\ NTS L L E 1 SEE SHEET 3 1FOR EASEMENT %L 1 1 DIMENSIONS to �� 0 � "C h�0es4ie,• TRACT NO. 4928 -3 - DETAIL ., Q.y eah�a' AT RIGHT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA fib$ . Pt6.-.,R •E !w' - ----' BEING A PORTION OF LOTS ZL 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, Vim? .c•- - ' •9,':� ---------- BCNp�pt15N�4 aR� I II @.J3' LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF ' TRACT NO. 4928 -1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF NON -OU — Iss R DETAIL "B" Aar HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. NTS RES,RKhO- u5[GY71EN, I ro•I I �ry� RESmic D- CAUwai I I I LOT 1 ,5117 AC. N / LwE ,AwLE I I I I REAamc I I I I NII N13 .'w 1 n_v'o0 E I I I 015 1 2r00'w I I I 2Y00 w 121 N>5'13'00 [ �1 c N1'1Yao w 122 u,:1r00'w cl ry LL225 N E L11 11-11 0w « „ IN 121 N07•1215 w - ?I I n x 4 . x1.-WW* � m I €I F 1: • 1 I x. m• I I I �L, N11 oo I I /,� Lv x1•,soow m I I I/ i SEE DETAIL "B•' v r,SOOw 4.00 I / ON SHEET 22 FOR >. N75-15 WE 7.w i / /�J i EASEMENT DATA v N2-4u E 110,52 ss mw ,m V \, .11 lrw 401K 1. rvlr00• 2rw 41 V o0' L. xosV t R:r d .v N.n•tr2E 14.Q II 5 .I Nso•n,w'E 2.71 1 �II s Ie- ,ev',: _.. rvi5�rot � ns I �52a2 ia s. s N 31' a'f 14.4 w .2•1r00•E 1x.s1' rya I - �•SY 1.161s1 SEE DETAIL "B" l HEREON FOR g � m �"8 EASEMENT DATA ✓ >/ 1 m P \ONSN�P 1 ry�o R SEE DETAIL "D" 'SS -- AT LEFT w uso. • R .1'03'00' I R :sn n' L"5 DETAIL D NTS 115 p h� LOT A s Ac. SEE DETAIL "A" °-a�, o��'a w......KC HEREON B Q �a.a. •ry,sY „c L - l iA1 / P � i V 'ut DETAIL "C" �P 1\ NTS L L E 1 SEE SHEET 3 1FOR EASEMENT %L 1 1 DIMENSIONS to �� 0 � "C h�0es4ie,• TRACT NO. 4928 -3 - DETAIL ., Q.y eah�a' AT RIGHT IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA fib$ . Pt6.-.,R •E !w' - ----' BEING A PORTION OF LOTS ZL 22, 25, 28, 29, 30, Vim? .c•- - ' •9,':� 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND BCNp�pt15N�4 aR� LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF !I TRACT NO. 4928 -1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 DETAIL "B" HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. NTS MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL, 2000 SCALE T . 150' SHEET 18 OF 24 SHEETS L. ! °' sFIC SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, SHEET ,J.oT _ VALLETTE TRACT NJ8 z'•` DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND �0B•'� 02• _ _ : •H °�,;;13E 3 f M R ry q 41 �,I s•7FFj• INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND 6N005 u EASEMENT NOTES =}yM1� .W v, - .- - 3r2 ,. B2. -•/� N`9t °I>Sa'C 1,..93' ni !Tn _ 5'90019•E. . NO2y� - _..- /Qj ------- 1- 2J'28'E — \O — r R 8 I N59-22'21'W 131193• y I I I I LOT G �7 162.977 AC. I I I 8 8 R I I 189.2224'W 1323.77- g I I I g I TRACT N0. 4928 -3 8 I IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK COUNTY OF VENTURA. STATE OF CALIFORNIA I BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 22, 28, 28, 2% 30, 33,34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND ------ LOT D AND A PORTION OF LOTS Q 7 AND 8 OF -- -- - - --- TRACT NO. 4928-1,144 MR 53 R HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES L03 ANGELES, INC. Na9.3Y2. w ,2.357- .. MICHAEL A KENNADA L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY. APRIL 2000 SCALE T = 160' SHEET 19 OF 24 SHEETS SEE SHEET yw, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND s EASEMENT NOTES. 9 A� ,_ ,�IMENSOSa tiF ' 4478.3' Z IS OF33 S5 W N69.1s36•E £ NAO�epA LU N w 16.55 w N,D39 �£ 7.04' 45.06' N>S. N29•29'07• 71749• ll1514' •, 9'SJ -W ]25.6 Lu =----- DETAIL'S' o� W oow' -- '13',6 810 5 { ?b� `EE SHEET 9 s�E CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE A EASEMENT T l�p�q`�i ASf P oIMENSDNS A S " 5 za zs P �p "'S A.ei M, O�'W_E St 0 M .` / M00•t6'3] -,., PO ° MPIONSHIP ' R�1•s. _______19.50___ __;�� ry :Po SEE SnEEl9 15.26'34:'"0 ). \• cj� '90 Po: a MENASE`MENT f A 9,].00' � - S >-31 69' P �- P a�41o•'z1D.( s SEE DETAIL "C' / \._,_-- '- 'z9Jaw •°'1 `(C` ON SHEET 21 \• \ �: &I' 09 ... 26- E ' W12•9- E 6-.• 4- 9-' S -o \ \ EE snE Et °a E9 N i -n (n DETAIL L A NTs 30•m139• MENS oS P G 35 e N70-37 44 W" S 5'I'a •- A R,• /2. \ `SERE SHEETS 9 AND 17 t�BUPo.j • \ -.�j ^N '4 EASEMENT DIMENSIONS —T' P 1p VALLETTE DIMENSIONSENT H `. A9`y `- -" ` d g2� 1 ]1 �En^,l�l20\ ��� f; � pp•� e � N e A�wi" 94 " 0. ,�. a�����i'- Oq-� b (• a "' jGg `' /� •V LOT G Is " 5„ o f: " � ,. ,K �efl \ . • , 6 s,z J �C ?1906"g5` •0 q` - rye R 00--- . ��'1r DAB TRACT MR 41 0 41 0 9 Poay W, b _:• - �R- 9,]00'RAD ,OOf 29•,640 / "69'�A9 EASEMENT DIME FOR 5 SNSE aR 5 : " 4406•. r...... i — � .. ... / --0� ui -[F 7885'53- �• _RA,5D0.6 pisE�InENBT EDR ,_ry \ \- "•�.�� iot1Be' -w SEE S Sap uENSIas�o; '.�\ -_- N\ N ]^y' \` 9[ 2�°°1 - T• N °' goy ^nu �>O�Ni_� -"9CI 1� OZ.L ��///" SEE 4489.31'1- EON EASEMENT ,013' W.- OIM[NSIONSN6503•w Nz0.5W15'E %v „^o FA�P.R.C. --- - --- -- _ - ----- -- - - - -- — 00 � -RAD PCC. ' °.� 4 F __ b0500.00 P A G_ ?. $ N •. ', Nao•SB s 7 0— _ - -_N -- _�— _ —_ - - -- \\ t e a. 9 96' .>t'a E"-- -,:•.- ..K 49 t5 R 256. N 8e•07'SS W '22'24W 13393' 4489 46 W240 �2. - E N89-1953'W 132561 _ N 75'05'5 7'E . ° 8 SEE DETAIL "8” f __- 1.a•Ef - - __ 30.55 SHOWN HEREON DD1265i, =- - I O °NE TABLE R SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, yw, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND �L EASEMENT NOTES. LS 6 4478.3' Z IS OF33 S5 W N69.1s36•E 2000' 1462' LED Nx•,z54•W NIr1749• N w 16.55 �£ 7.04' 45.06' ND— Io E 160 e,.1" 2 2. w N29•29'07• 71749• ll1514' •, 9'SJ -W ]25.6 DETAIL'S' TRACT MR 41 0 41 0 9 Poay W, b _:• - �R- 9,]00'RAD ,OOf 29•,640 / "69'�A9 EASEMENT DIME FOR 5 SNSE aR 5 : " 4406•. r...... i — � .. ... / --0� ui -[F 7885'53- �• _RA,5D0.6 pisE�InENBT EDR ,_ry \ \- "•�.�� iot1Be' -w SEE S Sap uENSIas�o; '.�\ -_- N\ N ]^y' \` 9[ 2�°°1 - T• N °' goy ^nu �>O�Ni_� -"9CI 1� OZ.L ��///" SEE 4489.31'1- EON EASEMENT ,013' W.- OIM[NSIONSN6503•w Nz0.5W15'E %v „^o FA�P.R.C. --- - --- -- _ - ----- -- - - - -- — 00 � -RAD PCC. ' °.� 4 F __ b0500.00 P A G_ ?. $ N •. ', Nao•SB s 7 0— _ - -_N -- _�— _ —_ - - -- \\ t e a. 9 96' .>t'a E"-- -,:•.- ..K 49 t5 R 256. N 8e•07'SS W '22'24W 13393' 4489 46 W240 �2. - E N89-1953'W 132561 _ N 75'05'5 7'E . ° 8 SEE DETAIL "8” f __- 1.a•Ef - - __ 30.55 SHOWN HEREON DD1265i, =- - I O °NE TABLE R TRACT NO. 4928 -3 ° IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21,2Z 25, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOT D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G6 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928 -1 144 MR 63 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE T - 150 SHEET 20 OF 24 SHEETS Y I 12 N60.22'21- —'W* 101 51' 3 Nze•59'lr- N18-4VWEf 12OS 1 2142' LS 6 4478.3' 5261' IS OF33 S5 W N69.1s36•E 2000' 1462' LED Nx•,z54•W NIr1749• N w 16.55 • 36•W N2r1149• 7.04' 45.06' N29•29'07• 71749• 1106' 45.26 4478.33°0 -E 06** 22 W TRACT NO. 4928 -3 ° IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21,2Z 25, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOT D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G6 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928 -1 144 MR 63 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA LS. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE T - 150 SHEET 20 OF 24 SHEETS Y ('11, . i SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES. .41, CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE 2"1 DETAIL "D" N.T.S. -- - -- — P, (SEE SHEET DETAIL W N.T.S. (SEE SHEET 3) DFNE c"AMPloss"T —A 'ABLE A R�us 7ABIE IV LWK LENGTI C22 11.2• 11W �B C2 A,-,,, " c3 I— CA-25W 2— c.—:-,,"',, P, A c, OB-15W MCI.' V OY14 m 235- 13.31 —0'05** 41 EAY 1 79 9'33' 23— 17 78 -j silm c6 1 B-21 08' 11 . 13.69' .B C7 — .2- —W 7B4O6' W 17 1W c, 1. .1w le .1W 112' W2W.' Bl— 141,11 Cl, 0� „1+„{I_ E 1 1 cli IS ­6,33, 917,W 4 41' 112 2r2g'41' 2D 1.11 0-14&5? TI W 4 11' LO Iw5r4l, 6.M. - 1� •41 - 537 7— CIA 1 14.48 c. 02-�D? 4 124 Ir 0-7 -TO-5 —16-646T fi L-51 Ell 02- 111 w — 73-553Cr 90W 11-- .4-11 fll� cmonvir m.,- o,.- 22-B"' 3— NELSON ROAD P B 13 21 141 01-24'11* 97650 ]]91' 3T2i 4Y a2 03 2622 S986 C43 ol. w —w 20.70' DETAIL 'E' 9.W N 71 -116' 975 21 CI LME 11BI TABLE N.T.S. CHA14PIONSHIP (SEE SHEET 7) D RIVE L3 BI—or, 110 L4 I 11 N1108 I* N0—� —'W'E E,16 1. DETAIL "C" 2— j., A�- -. " --- -7B. W,�tt 'i* Pq' "25. - - ; . — — " I, ", " i 17 1. 1B —25 52 * N89-25'52** —'21'11'* I., N.T.S. 3 W (SEE SHEET 20) 1. _ - , — " �5­ uo 4 -: "I - Ill N.- 3 1 N.—v, 43.7C -2 TRACT NO. 4928-3 -vi --------------- N44 11M 77N I IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK L15 COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. A BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 2122, 25, 20, 29, 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOT D AND A PORTION OF LOTS a 7 AND 8 OF 9w 5 DETAIL "B" TRACT NO. 4928A 144 MR 53 N.T.S. HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. (SEE SHEET 12) MICHAEL A, KENNADA, L& 5642 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 2000 SHEET 21 OF 24 SHEETS C � l i r I � L11 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES. r. LIE TABLE aasT 7WRIE '� LIE 0[ARIHO X19'1518W H30.1Y49"W [NOiH L1�153: 100' WL1A 15.16'36' N01H W LEII.O'. p.0 11 NM'12'W. 11 X59'221 rW 713'* 3318 V 90000' N-35- 233" 80' C3 1.3748' 18.13'11 5350x' 1119 5500' 30.36' 51]00' 181.90 03'15'1 a 347' 1-1 6 NS 1 '43'W 4000' 5x•25'45' 1 55 LIT t 4641 11 \ A� X19'1141 "W L9 W S6.fiB' 41.1 50.1515' E. 50.250' 3151'45 12.50' 3250' 3500 1 186,' 2311 \ OBE \ f H 6.07'21 O 38.3131' ]500' 23.54' 1 \ N43'SY24W L11 -.,II 'W "W MfirW'W E A•1 YYE 31.01' ,000' 11. 40. W' Ell 3B'32'3e" n1 „bi♦ Ell C14 04'4," x90.00'W' 55.x' 1256 SIx 3! %, s\ �- S�\ \ \ X70'12'1 YE CIS C17 14.35'02' W' 21W' 111' 14. W' \ ]0.1501' 2100' Ct8 13.5151 11100 019 14YJ7'4Y 15W' EN 21.19'21 C1t 24.39'51• 25.82' 2373]4' 13.1Y 34.41 \ DETAIL A \ ,`\�� C21 139'51' C14 1.49'11 35 W' 65 W' W. W' W.6W' 22298' W' •'. \ �•. p A PRIMER DRIVE \ \\ g �575�1 � / �y � <.yR b' ' b ^•mo °'R y "oQb'��K �j�Q - S „. c - \z. . ''1" QQ\��, t �<s., -, '•�'-: •:; \ E,N 6„ 6 \lW R7o•16'a2' __.._ \ Zia `' ' 3L?5•'p10 050 q)T"E 5 Ig '.,�, NOV4^SYE.- �\1 IG - C' ' - -v D i --------- II go-•P8c Xsos\e \I V a!II +•b:° HI III ° �9 E \,. `� sa „s2•`E \Q + 2025.16' 5ti8d.tiry �" o-32.xT,g ;:+ 3� - DETAIL TRACT N0. 4928 -3 L -1671 \ k' .. s;V \-• ,� ,' w '� s` f� IM1'•.a� �. �: �ri. (_N, g N.i Sa 5x. 1 ° IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK ,! g� - - COUNTY OF VENTURA. STATE OF CALIFORNIA N.4 BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21, 22, 25, 28, 2% 30, ^8 -n/ /n�pS 5j1 p0 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND I'y.9 s'y9 „ B LOT D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G. 7 AND 8 OF s29.1r 1 \ONSN�Q DETAIL - - m "E ` N.1.9. Rb __- •. TRACT NO. 4928 -1144 MR 53 q�572.- - -_. _ oQ. (SEE . IT 16) b is HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES, INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 ' Nw SHEET 22 OF 24 SHEETS C� a A SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND EASEMENT NOTES VALLETTE N89'Ii 19•W 3 TRACT MR 41 1]9!_)9 f - 8 Na- 9u�A9lE RE9iftiC2D -U6E EA6EYFWi I <` 0. Oa co N djE X39 -- 't N M93'11'47' o•,9�E N9Y35OdE N] 36� E L B F R 13,,. -80.00' .. 4C Li1BLE0R [AYWENi W SNEEi \ � N!z'3];OO6E0 •:; 6 ' / x01'15 ppW gYEN`!q'I � i ' — L= \t1.)9 E\ LOT 02'x8'00• .� -... _ w ---- L -x + -ea •. _._ e�\z•L2 L_o_�_L.Iw D' u ft =5)809 J900 R =62100 1!':Al'00• _ .7b. }1 i. W ru/ by �' � �g•1�38 L =x06.81' 1 -10A15 _ � W i Ni )•N0\ W ��'i'' 6 W E \0� ENE TAD',E 1d 1S UNE 9EAMNC LEHLM LI N]5'3J'OdE z59-5d _ o, J `4=11.11'!6' R.61J00' y15'01'Si - - L- 111.1B.rt 6N, 4= 9J'1]'00' R.550.00' � L= L1�•2] 0 0Y � -- —'59 24' l� Sin TRACT NO. 4928 -3 IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 21 22, 25,28,2% 30, 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LOTS C AND D AND A PORTION OF LOTS G, 7 AND 8 OF TRACT NO. 4928 -1144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELES INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, LS, 6842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE: f = W SHEET 23 OF 24 SHEETS s t l � / dT a VALLETTE TRACT I 9 5 i 3 MR 41 Ne9m'te"w na.l9' `_ xn•n•ze •w / p °afar a =a.3e L /mod ® 6 �RESe � -SSE 1lde EA r _ _ y xD9•u'li[ — — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ — — _ — — _ — — _ _ — — — _ — _ — _ _ — — _ — — _ — — _ _ — — _ q"...0. 3. a� W Llll LLI � " _ LOT AI 2 8. a. - -- c. r, pM1 �' h >rzesr �__ �\�Y\ :'• :.;. RID•:ne•w zN,, "'� ��;wa•�5 w..oac cz1 T �\ ";'•� %'Sj.� l'wro l0.>5' Rb�l,,pgp °J•.•_.__ L is Q hM1`t. cV�Ni ,_ ' aw:,PC"c _. ze•sr'+r C / 2 5�? P� brx•y. °IY NO6'.b'SO "E�2a • �C io eDD.oD. V [s 105Rs'sr AO(N IB'[ z i.t°3— e.1 =•�-�' <s;� a. �� �� _ -s : GAS- (N -66S�S 4J \> "0j, CHgMpIO oze to V i•�5 ?3 - \ ° to - - e Sr o'°a• NSHIP DRIVE \ o ° 5`iS•Ir' .T \% / pi/ p0_w l.zl s5 ._._ ••. / \ .3Ni Ns•zs'zl. t- \\ 533 \ a,o7R2!p,, R;° -�a'Y a5 r _ w' - `---b\ _ K / c'. / � se5 �l ` \ \ \ Sr056 PARCEL A OF LET LINE ABAISINENI "'wNrs AES'lR, "'"L' -s °J' l $;f LOT P °05 20 z-0INO a9 R—DED As s'.�ty� 10 \ ho uq''fie l .x s T tl taz Ac O �h) 118.96' 1p — z,>. aRK TABLE w: ='_ K+o`t'�szi•_ .__, sy13" i \� a .rz iz'9s" e.ts•m's+' ` '�C�„� a' >Pe jB;�/ 523.Op'L =11t Vie' ru CORNS DELIA RAqu1 LENDTN alh'Sx�00 p. wy Apt 'S30 rq. ,� ry i 116.98 - Lu °a• -.. -,` xzyY?'alp. �__ - stlae' 2 nt —25' tom' 6 DoE., 0tz 6-22' 55.50' B 7 w1l•OO]]50 •, 6.9E '• .. Y;� (/I C13 11'25'10" 1080 lye' 3•g cM1 w -6R >° 70 ='�^ 0--20- 19.50' 29e2' ' 14.16.11' 100' 1961' {,ir, inn F'p 'PM1�CA`l x°rs.zrw 9' . z1B0' 11"6' apw' Zh. s!` 4A' 8 Mp, -A'�� R.LD. iR =601:1. p.tA'1ltfia� �wS L'z>g.01' 601.00• P� 6 OD'L.t ctl 146' ryc %y' �.- e- trtA•w" R- fiDD.OD' vtmzs' .- W I IS C10 .-W24• - 2S 10 N \Q�1J �,., � g'L� ?� 4.b•,f. c2t 111 -'S6 —0 ill If 01'1311" Bz1000' C23 0915'569: US W- 21'19• :9.' h,z• „�� "a - TRACT NO. 4928 -3 8 1'si'1D- 511 �' p :•.e'or ear LINE TABLE ['R°'w'z IN THE CITY OF MOORPARK, A-­'�S oz•o9zr 6oz0D LINE %IArvD LExcT,, \cp,�4 COUNTY OF VENTURA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Le xis zs'WE \ BEING A PORTION LOTS 21 25, 28, 30, V T M 1.3S \l 33, 34 AND 38 OF THE VALLETTE TRACT, 3 MR 41 AND LI 1110 LOTS C AND D AND A OF PORTION LOTS a 7 AND 8 OF SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, xsr -E 1514 TRACT NOA928 -1, 144 MR 53 AND A PORTION OF DATUM STATEMENT, BOUNDARY AND SHEET xD1•Dr.9-[ Na•v'IS'E m' LOT A OF TRACT NO. 4928 -2, 144 MR 74 INDEX MAP, RECORD REFERENCE INDEX AND x26•slso'E m' EASEMENT NOTES. w2rts'xE .DD' HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES LOS ANGELS$ INC. MICHAEL A KENNADA, L.S. 5842 DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2000 SCALE: f = w SHEET 24 OF 24 SHEETS