Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2003 0305 CC REGResolution No. 2003 -2055 Ordinance No. 292 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 2003 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 3. ROLL CALL: 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Certificate of Appreciation from the United Way of Ventura County. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any member of the public may address the Council during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Council concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at 517 -6223. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda March 5, 2003 Page 2 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: (AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING, UNLESS CANCELED.) 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2. 8, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider Proposals for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. (Continued from February 5, 2003, with public hearing closed.) Staff Recommendation: Authorize the allocations recommended by the Budget and Finance Committee and staff from FY 2003/2004 CDBG funds, as described in the agenda report, with the provision that these amounts be prorated if the total funding allocated to Moorpark is higher or lower than $197,623. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED. (Staff: Nancy Burns) B. Consider Re- allocation of Unspent Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds from Prior Years FY 1998/1999, FY 1999/2000, FY 2000/2001, FY 2001/2002, and FY 2002/2003. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open a public hearing on reallocation of funds from prior years, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Authorize the re- allocation of unspent funds from previous years, as shown in the agenda report, to the Spring Road Project; and 3) Re- allocate $1,000, previously allocated to the Senior Survivalmobile (FY 2001/2002) to the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program, providing this is consistent with HUD guidelines. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED. (Staff: Nancy Burns) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda March 5, 2003 Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued) C. Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M &M Development. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration as sufficient environmental documentation; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264. (Staff: Barry Hogan) 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider an Ordinance Amending Section 3.16.050 of Chapter 3.16 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Changing the Reporting Requirements of the City Treasurer to the City Council. Staff Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance No. for first reading and waive full reading of the ordinance. (Staff: Cynthia Borchard) B. Consider Resolution Amending the FY 2002/2003 Budget, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Flinn Realignment Project (Project 8037). Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2003- 2) Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project; and 3) Authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) C. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the 2003 Slurry Seal Project. Staff Recommendation: Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda March 5, 2003 Page 4 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: (Continued) D. Consider Resolution Amending the FY 2002/2003 Budget, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Asphalt Overlay 2003 Project (Project 8011). Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003- approve the plans and specifications for the subject project, approve the addition to the scope of work AC pavement remedial work on Tierra Rejada Road, and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED. (Staff: Ken Gilbert) 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - March 5, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant 111972 - 111974 $ 23,858.09 111424 $ (2,962.40) Payroll Liability 111975 - 111982 $ 12,375.50 Warrants Regular Warrants 111983 - 112091 & $ 64,774.03 112092 - 112132 $1,263,809.14 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. B. Consider Mid -Year Amendments to 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Budget. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003 - amending the FY 2002/2003 budget. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Cynthia Borchard) C. Initiate Proceedings Related to the Levy of Assessments for the Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003- authorizing preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Moorpark Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for FY 2003/04. (Staff: Mary Lindley) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda March 5, 2003 Page 5 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Continued) D. Consider Request from Moorpark Kiwanis to Waive Park Rental Fees for Softball Tournament. Staff Recommendation: Approve the request from Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees associated with their Girls Softball Tournament, provided that they pay all direct costs incurred by the City, including one staff person dedicated to the Tournament. (John Hartnett) E. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Procurement and Installation of Transit Bus Shelters. Staff Recommendation: Approve the plans and specifications for the procurement and installation of transit bus shelters, and authorize staff to proceed with the bid process for this project. (Staff: John Brand) F. Consider Leaving One Teen Council Position Vacant Until the Next Regularly Scheduled Recruitment. Staff Recommendation: Concur that the vacant teen council position will not be filled due to the length of the remaining term of office. (Staff: Deborah Traffenstedt) 11. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance No. 291, an Ordinance of the Cit of Moorpark, California, Amending Chapter 6.04 General Provisions, Chapter 6.08 Animal Control, Chapter 6.12 Impoundment, and Chapter 6.16 Licensing of Cats and Dogs, of Title 6, Animals, to Allow Designated City Staff to Enforce Title 6. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 291 read for the second time and adopted as read. 12. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) Regular City Council Meeting Agenda March 5, 2003 Page 6 12. CLOSED SESSION: (Continued) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Assistant City Manager, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Chief of Police, Administrative Services Director, Community Development Director, Community Services Director, and Public Works Director. 13. ADJOURNMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II). iTEm SAO d� < <<�rs a��tl ft' Lorr�_]r�rrrrCa�� el- MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst �. Date: February 20, 2003 (CC Meeting of March 5, 2003) Subject: Consider Proposals for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for FY 2003/2004 BACKGROUND At its regular meeting February 5, 2003, Council received a staff report summarizing proposals for the use of CDBG funds for FY 2003/2004, estimated to be approximately one hundred ninety seven thousand six hundred twenty -three dollars ($197,623). After hearing public testimony, Council closed the public hearing and directed the Budget and Finance Committee to prepare a recommendation for final appropriations for Council's consideration prior to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 5, 2003. DISCUSSION The City has not received notification yet as to the exact funding it can anticipate for FY 2003/2004, so last year's funding amount is being used as an estimate of this year's funding. Staff will request that funding authorizations for FY 2003/2004 include direction to adjust these funding approvals to reflect the same percentage of the final funding the City receives. Seven (7) Public Service proposals totaling sixty -five thousand four hundred twenty -three dollars ($65,423) were received. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations limit funds for Public Service projects to fifteen percent (15 %) of the City's total allocation, or approximately twenty -nine 000001 Honorable City Council Date 02/27/03 Page 2 thousand six hundred forty -three dollars ('$29,643). Two proposals totaling nineteen thousand three hundred twenty -five dollars ($19,325) were received for Public Improvement projects. At its Special Meeting of February 19, 2003, the Budget and Finance Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) considered the proposals submitted and recommends that three (3) Public Service projects could provide a variety of basic services to a large number of residents with immediate needs. These programs are the Catholic Charities Community Services Program, the Ventura County Human Services Agency's Senior Nutrition Program, and the City's Senior Center Operations (Part -time Staff Assistance). The Committee also recommends that funds for the RAIN Project rehabilitation to create a Child Care Facility at its site, Food Share for its expansion project, and Administration costs should be allocated for these purposes. The Committee also recommends funding the acquisition of property for the Spring Road Project, which will provide services to low income persons and is described more fully in the staff report to Council on funding re- allocations. Funding amounts for the above recommendations are as follows: A.$29,643 for Public Service projects with the following allocations: i. Catholic Charities $ 7,643 ii. Senior Center Operations $12,000 iii. Senior Nutrition $10,000 B.$24,580 for Administration costs with the following allocations: i. City Staff ii. Fair Housing $22,580 $ 2,000 C. $2,500 for the RAIN Project's Building Rehabilitation for a Child Care Facility; D. $5,000 for Food Share for its expansion project; and E. $96,667 for the Spring Road Project. 3000012 Honorable City Council Date 02/27/03 Page 3 While not discussed by the Budget and allocating the remaining $39,233 of the FY allocation to the Spring Road Project would another public hearing to re- allocate then date. RECOMMENDATIONS (ROLL CALL VOTE) Finance Committee, 2003/2004 estimated avoid the need for e funds at a later Authorize the allocations recommended by the Budget and Finance Committee and staff from FY 2003/2004 CDBG funds, as described in this report, with the provision that these amounts be pro- rated if the total funding allocated to Moorpark is higher or lower than $197,623. ITEM - - to Se. I - 1Z;LC 0 /� ,;_ . G MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT To: Honorable City Council From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst . Date: February 20, 2003 (CC Meeting of March 5, 2003) Subject: Consider Re- allocation of Unspent Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds from Prior Years FY 1998/1999, FY 1999/2000, FY 2000/2001, FY 2001/2002, FY 2002/2003 BACKGROUND Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations limit the amount of unexpended funds that may be retained in the City's CDBG line of credit to one and one half (1 %) times the City's annual funding allocation. This is approximately three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000). Unexpended CDBG funds from previous years that are available to be reprogrammed to another use total approximately three hundred seventy thousand dollars ($370,000). Notice of a public hearing March 5, 2003, was advertised for the re- allocation of unexpended CDBG funds from prior years. DISCUSSION At its February 19, 2003, meeting, the Budget and Finance Committee (Mayor Hunter and Councilmember Harper) recommended funding the acquisition of approximately two (2) acres of land upon which to construct facilities that will house organizations that provide services to low income persons. Anticipated tenants include organizations such as Catholic Charities. Accommodations to be provided for Moorpark's day laborer population will include a safe area for congregating, shelter and rest rooms. The Committee recommended that funds previously allocated for Affordable Housing, Administration, and some funds 300004 G Honorable City Council Date 02/27/03 Page 2 allocated to a Public Park could be re- allocated in the amount of three hundred seventy thousand dollars ($370,000) for this purpose. The property under consideration is the northwest 2 acres of a 7.59 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Flinn Avenue and Spring Road. The original 7.59 acre parcel was purchased by the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency for the construction of a new police facility. After selecting a design for the police facility, it was determined that the 2 acres at the northwest end of the parcel are not required for completion of the police station and other commitments. This land was appraised for approximately $653,175. A copy of the staff report to the Budget and Finance Committee was provided to Councilmembers under separate cover. The nature of a project this size funding. In addition to reallocating of $370,000 for the Spring Road recommended that funds in the amount could be committed for each of the fis 2004/2005, and FY 2005/2006. requires multi -year CDBG funds in the total amount Project, the Committee of approximately $96,667 cal years FY 2003/2004, FY Recommended funding re- allocations, totaling $370,000, are from the following existing allocations: A.$69,367 from Affordable Housing FY 1998/1999 B. $90,294 from Affordable Housing FY 1999/2000 C.$107,559 from Affordable Housing FY 2000/2001 D.$5,587 from Administration FY 2001/2002 E. $97,193 from Public Park FY 2002/2003 The Committee also discussed the Long -term Care Ombudsman Program, and concurred that it would not recommend but would consider as part of the annual budget deliberation. Honorable City Council Date 02/27/03 Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS (ROLL CALL VOTE) 1. Open a public hearing on reallocation of funds from prior years, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2. Authorize the re- allocations of unspent funds from previous years, as shown in this report, to the Spring Road Project; and 3. Re- allocate $1,000, previously allocated to the Senior Survivalmobile (FY 2001/2002), to be re- allocated to the Long -term Care Ombudsman Program, providing this is consistent with HUD guidelines. 00066 ITEM Ce • CTTV OF "+✓ oo,RpARK, f AT,TFORNTA City Cnrtneil Meetinz of 3 -'J ' `2C 03 ACTION: �Gr7 fl rlU�cl �� r1 -�GC MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL PIV. ��� • • —•�_ -�� — AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Directo Prepared By: Paul Porter, Principal Planner DATE: February 12, 2003 (CC Meeting of 3/5/03) SUBJECT: Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M&M Development. (Assessor Parcel No(s). 514 -0- 160 -045) BACKGROUND Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264 were originally heard by the Planning Commission on October 28, 2002, and continued to subsequent meetings due to Planning Commission concerns relative to. • Protect Access and Circulation • Alcohol Sales at the Service Station • Proposed Hotel • Hours of Operation of the Service Station • Adjacent Wall Along the Westerly Property Line Bordering the Multi - Family Residential Development • Wall Along the Caltrans Right -of -way Located to the Side and Rear of the Property • Outside Audio Speakers for Drive - through Service S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 2 On January 27, 2003, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437 recommending to the City Council conditional approval of CPD No. 2000 -04 and TPM No. 5264. DISCUSSION The original CPD application included a 72,285 square foot commercial center, with a service station/ convenience store, car wash, fast -food restaurant, retail /office buildings and a 56 -room hotel (the applicant has since eliminated the request for the hotel) on a 6.28 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive. TPM No. 5264, is a request for a four (4) parcel subdivision. The project recommended by the Planning Commission for approval was achieved through the assistance of a Planning Commission Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Commissioners Mark DiCecco and Kipp Landis. During the October 28, 2002 and January 27, 2003 Planning Commission meetings, a large number of written statement cards were submitted, the majority indicating support for the project, but many of those indicating concerns with certain aspects of the proposal. Many public speakers also participated in the hearing process. At the October 28, 2002 hearing, a slight majority of the public speakers were opposed to the project, several of those stating support for the project cited specific concerns with certain uses and hours of operation. At the January 27, 2003 meeting, the majority of public speakers spoke in support for a commercial center, but continued to express concerns with some aspects of the proposal. A summary of the issues discussed at the Planning Commission and their recommendations on these issues are as follows: Protect Access and Circulation: The applicant is proposing three (3) driveways along Campus Park Drive, and one (1) driveway near the west bound 118 Freeway on -ramp on Collins Drive. The City Engineer reviewed the applicant's proposed driveways and suggested conditions to the project which would eliminate the most easterly proposed Campus Park Drive driveway (in the vicinity of the proposed gas station) and that the proposed Collins Drive driveway be restricted to right -in only turning movements. No additional material has been provided by the applicant which would warrant a change in the conditions as recommended by the City Engineer. The specific conditions recommended by the City Engineer included: S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 3 • Median improvements on Campus Park Drive to be aligned to direct westerly left turn movement from Campus Park Drive to the most westerly driveway, while restricting left turn movements from the site and requiring the easterly driveway (the center driveway per the applicant's proposal) to be restricted to right- turn -in and right- turn -out traffic only. • Driveway on Collins Drive shall be designed to be a right -in only and the median on Collins Drive shall be extended to prohibit left turn movements into the site. After consideration of the City Engineer's conditions, the applicant's proposal, and public testimony, the Planning Commission expressed concern that the City Engineer's recommendation made both internal and external circulation very difficult. As a result, the Commission recommended to the City Council that the applicant's proposed circulation (per the site plan) be approved. To summarize, the Planning Commission supported: • Right -in and right -out turning movements for the Collins Drive driveway, with the requirement of extending the Collins Drive median to prevent left turns into the center from Collins Drive. • Modification of the Campus Park Drive median to allow left turns for west bound Campus Park traffic into the center with the requirement that the applicant pay for the median modification and agree to replant and maintain the median landscaping. • Right -in and out only for the most easterly and westerly driveways on Campus Park Drive. Staff remains concerned that the circulation as proposed by the applicant has the potential to further deteriorate the traffic movements along Collins Drive and Campus Park Drive. This issue is further addressed in the Analysis section below. Alcohol Sales for Service Station: Concerns were expressed that the sale of alcoholic beverages at the proposed service station would increase crime in the neighborhood and attract unsavory characters to loiter in the nearby park and neighborhood. The Planning Commission indicated to those concerned regarding alcohol sales that the sale of alcohol would require approval of a Conditional Use Permit, which would be discussed through a separate public hearing process and would require notification to surrounding property owners within 1,000 feet of S: \Community Development \= PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 4 the subject property. A Condition of Approval has been included, which confirms this process. Proposed Hotel: A majority of the public expressed a concern with a hotel, citing it as an unacceptable land use that would increase traffic in the area to unacceptable levels. The applicant has eliminated the hotel from the application to alleviate the neighborhood concerns. The Planning Commission concurred with the applicant's proposal and included a condition in the Planning Commission Resolution requiring the submittal of a revised site plan showing the elimination of the hotel use and requiring that any proposed use on the remaining pad would require approval of a Modification to the Commercial Planned Development. Hours of Operation for Service Station: Because the applicant had indicated that the service station and mini -mart affiliated with the service station were planned for twenty -four (24) operation, several of the public speakers addressed the issue of limiting the hours of the station and the center. The Planning Commission has recommended including a Condition of Approval limiting the operation of the center to 10 p.m., but allowing, on a trial basis, 24 -hour operation for the service station for one (1) year. If at anytime, even within the first year, the hours of operation become a problem relative to the service station use, the Community Development Director would be authorized to limit the hours of operation, but in no case less than a 10 p.m. closing time. The hours of operation of the car wash should be the same as the shopping center, closing at 10 p.m. Adjacent Wall Along the Westerly Property Line Bordering the Multi - Family Residential Development: Initially, staff suggested the construction of an eight -foot (8') high wall along the west property line adjacent to the existing multi- family residences. The Planning Commission questioned the requirement for an eight -foot (8') wall when there is an existing six -foot (6') wall along the westerly property line, adjacent to the existing multi - family residences. Considering the site plan design in which the commercial buildings themselves provide a buffer for the adjacent residential units and the fact that a landscaped buffer is proposed along the property line, the Planning Commission felt that a new eight -foot (8') high wall at the same location would be overkill. The existing wall was not properly engineered for the additional height and would have to be removed in order to construct an eight -foot (8') wall. The Planning Commission supported a modified condition to indicate that the S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc lt, %'� -01 () Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 5 existing wall, with a requirement to replace the two (2) openings in the wall with matching block, as sufficient buffering. Wall Along the Caltrans Right -of -way Located to the Side and Rear of the Propertv: Staff recommended that the applicant construct a solid masonry wall along the Caltrans right -of -way and to landscape the Caltrans slope. The Planning Commission felt that the wall could be a potential attraction for graffiti vandals and also would prevent viewing the required landscaping. Therefore, the Commission recommended that the applicant construct a decorative wrought iron fence with pilasters. A Condition of Approval has been included requiring the wrought iron fence along the Caltrans right -of -way. Outside Audio Speakers for Drive - through Service: The Planning Commission had a concern that the use of outside audio speakers for order taking could be disruptive to surrounding property owners and suggested that a system similar to the McDonalds at Spring Road and New Los Angeles Avenue be implemented for the fast -food restaurant, but did not add a condition to its Resolution prohibiting the use of outside audio equipment. This issue is discussed further in the Analysis section of this report. ANALYSIS Staff's analysis of Planning Commission recommendations has identified the following three (3) issue areas for City Council consideration: Protect Access and Circulation: The Planning Commission recommended right -in and right -out only at the Collins entrance to the site in order to better facilitate circulation for the center. However, the City Engineer strongly recommends that Collins Drive be restricted to right -in only due to traffic safety concerns with south bound Collins Drive traffic accelerating onto the freeway. The City Engineer feels that people turning right out of the Collins Drive driveway would present a potential traffic hazard and a dangerous situation. Although the draft Resolution reflects the Planning Commission's recommendation to allow right -out turns at the Collins entry, staff recommends that right -in movements only be allowed, and that right -out movements from the site onto Collins Avenue be prohibited. The Planning Commission recommended that the applicant's proposed driveways along Campus Park be approved as submitted. This would allow for right -in and out of the east and west driveways and a S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 6 median break for the center driveway. The median break would require reconfiguration of the Campus Park median. The Planning Commission required that the applicant pay for the cost of the reconfiguration of the median, the installation of new landscaping, as well as, the maintenance of the median. Staff feels that an additional requirement of a dedicated left turn out of the center would be appropriate. In this recommended center driveway reconfiguration, it would allow for three (3) lanes in the center driveway, i.e. right -in, right -out and left -out. Maintenance of the median should be through an assessment district. Outside Audio Speakers for Drive - through Service: While the Planning Commission discussed restricting the use of outside speakers at the proposed fast -food restaurant, it did not take formal action on this issue. In order to alleviate the potential for noise intrusion to surrounding property owners, staff has included a special condition for the Commercial Planned Development, prohibiting the use of outside speakers at the commercial center. Traffic Systems Management Fee and Citywide Traffic Fee: The applicant has raised concerns relative to the calculation of this fee. Staff anticipates having a proposal for Council consideration at the time of the meeting. In addition, the amount of the Citywide Traffic Fee is inconsistent with the amount per acre required in Development Agreements for several projects. ENVIRONMENTAL Pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment, and based upon an Initial Study and analysis of available information, it was found that there is substantial evidence that the potential impacts of the proposed project on the environment will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared, and is recommended to be adopted in compliance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA). STAFF RECOI- MNDATIONS 1. 2. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration as sufficient environmental documentation. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc 31.�� Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 7 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft City Council Resolution No. 2003- 2. Staff report and attachments for Planning Commission Hearing on January 27, 2003, which includes staff report from the October 28, 2002 Planning Commission meeting (Draft PC Resolutions not included). 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437 (Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval not included). S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \cc 030305.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PERMIT NO. 2000 -04 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) NO. 5264 ON A 6.28 - ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMPUS PARK DRIVE AND COLLINS DRIVE, ON THE APPLICATION OF M &M DEVELOPMENT. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 514 -0 -160 -045) WHEREAS, on January 27, 2003, the City of Moorpark Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437, recommending to the City Council approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264 for a 72,285 square foot commercial retail center and subdivision of approximately 6.28 acres into four (4) parcels of 1.46, 0.76, 0.67 and 3.39 gross acres, located at the southwest corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive, on the application of M &M Development; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed hearing on March 5, 2003, the City Council considered Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 5, 2003, the City Council opened the public hearing; took public testimony and after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and any supplements thereto, and consideration of written and oral public testimony both for and against the proposal, has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: A. The City Council has received and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prior to acting on the proposed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. B. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California, beginning at Section 21000), the City Council has determined that the Negative Declaration prepared for this project has been completed in compliance with S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Resolutions \ccreso.doc CC ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 2 CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. This finding reflects the independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Moorpark. SECTION 2. COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying studies, the City Council has determined that this application, with the attached Special and Standard Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: A. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan, and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. B. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. C. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. D. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. E. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure(s) have design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 3. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT FINDINGS: Based on the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying maps and studies the City Council has determined that the Tentative Parcel Map, with imposition of the attached special and standard Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: A. The proposed map is consistent with the City's General Plan. B. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable General Plan. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 3 E. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. H. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. I. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. SECTION 4. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: A. The City Council approves Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04, with removal of the proposed hotel use, subject to the special and standard conditions of approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The City Council approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 subject to the special and standard conditions of approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2003 Patrick Hunter, Mayor Resolution No. 2003 - Page 4 ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 2003 - Page 5 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) NO. 2000 -04 Please contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT for questions regarding compliance with the following condition(s) 1. All conditions of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264 shall apply. 2. The development of Pads A, B, C and D shall be built as one (1) phase. 3. Any proposed use, site plan and building elevations for Pad E is subject to the review and approval of a Modification to Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04. 4. There shall be no access to building lease areas from the west elevation, except to meet required exiting provisions of the Uniform Building Code. 5. Second story windows on the west facing elevation of the buildings along the west portion of the site adjacent to the condominiums shall have either louvered covering over the windows or have a minimum bottom sill height of six (6') feet or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director to reduce or inhibit direct views west from the second story windows to the existing residential development. 6. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first building the applicant shall complete the wall and fencing requirements of this condition. The wall along the entire west property line adjacent to the residences shall remain at a height of six (6') feet, but the openings in the wall shall be closed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The entire existing Caltrans chain -link fence along the subject property from the Caltrans road access gate shall be replaced with a six foot high decorative wrought iron fence, with six -foot, high block pilasters located twenty -five (25') feet on center, or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director. The existing Caltrans road access gate shall be replaced with a decorative gate. The design and color of the fencing and gate are subject to the review and approval Resolution No. 2003 - Page 6 of the Community and gate may be Director should fencing. Development Director. Alternative fencing approved by the Community Development Caltrans not approve the wrought iron 7. The landscape plan for the shopping center, including the Caltrans right -of -way, shall incorporate the loss of mature trees in the Campus Park Drive median, in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. 8. Earthen berms, hedges and /or low walls shall be provided where needed to screen views of parked vehicles from adjacent streets. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit a landscape plan, including phasing, for review and approval by the Community Development Director. The first phase of landscaping shall include, but not be limited to all landscaping around the perimeter of the site, at driveway entrances including the Campus Park Drive medians, raised islands within the parking areas, and surrounding constructed building areas. To ensure an attractive appearance for the commercial center until build -out, all areas of the site not proposed for construction in the first phase shall include interim groundcover landscaping and irrigation to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 10. On -site sale of alcoholic beverages without prior approval of a City Council approved Conditional Use Permit is prohibited. Public notice will require notification to surrounding property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. 11. The use of outside speakers of any kind at the commercial center for order - taking or any other purpose is prohibited. 12. The Caltrans property along the entire property frontage located adjacent to the freeway on -ramp including the islands located to the east of the Caltrans easement, as well as, the existing islands in Collins Drive shall be landscaped. In the event that Caltrans does not allow landscaping in some of the islands, decorative pavement, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director may be substituted. Maintenance of landscaping in these areas shall be performed through a city approved assessment district. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for executing an agreement with Caltrans for installation and maintenance of Resolution No. 2003 - Page 7 the required landscaping and irrigation within the Caltrans right -of -way along Collins Drive. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 8 SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) NO. 5264 PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) 1. All conditions of Commercial Planned Development No. 2000- 04 shall apply. 2. On Campus Park Drive west of the project boundary to the centerline of Collins Drive) the existing raised center median shall remain except for a left -turn pocket into the center driveway. The applicant shall modify the median in accordance with Caltrans standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The applicant shall maintain existing width of all lanes, sidewalks and parkways. The applicant shall provide a 11-�-inch thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay on both sides of the street. The center medians shall be trimmed back, if necessary, to accommodate the ADA ramp alignments. The median shall be planted with a minimum of one (1) tree with the median nose planted with annuals. The applicant is required to provide tree replacement for any trees to be removed from the median consistent with City Ordinance requirements. Root barriers shall be provided for all perennial plant material. The applicant shall be required to maintain the entire length of the median in perpetuity through a city —approved assessment district. All costs of forming the assessment district shall be borne by the applicant. 3. On Collins Drive the applicant shall submit to Caltrans for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements within their right -of -way. Concurrent submittals shall be made to the City Engineer for review. A copy of all final approved Caltrans permits shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from Caltrans prior to construction of any proposed roadway or other improvements within their right -of -way. Any additional right -of -way required to implement the approved design for this work in their right - of -way, including slope easements for future grading, shall be acquired by the applicant and dedicated to the State in a manner acceptable to Caltrans and the City Engineer. All required dedications shall be illustrated on the Final Parcel Map. Proof of encroachment or other non -City permits Resolution No. 2003 - Page 9 and bonds shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the start of any grading or construction activities. The applicant shall provide a 11,�-inch thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay for the full width of the street (approximately 700 feet) from the northerly limits of the Collins and Campus Park Drive intersection to one - hundred feet (100') south of the project boundary. 4. For the driveway on Collins Drive the applicant shall provide minimum 12 -feet wide travel right in only lanes. Curb return radii shall be 45 -feet and shall accommodate turning requirements for a California semi - trailer truck. In addition, applicant shall provide a raised median on Collins to preclude left turns into site. This median shall be landscaped. Maintenance of the median shall be through a city approved assessment district. 5. The applicant shall dedicate vehicular access rights to the City of Moorpark along Campus Park and Collins Drives, except at approved points. 6. The applicant, at no cost to the City, shall have a Traffic Study prepared that analyzes the intersection of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive, Collins Drive and State Route 118 west bound ramps, and Collins Drive and State Route 118 eastbound ramps /Los Angeles Avenue including striping and signalization and /or other appropriate requirements. The applicant shall be responsible for the full cost of any intersection improvements required by the City. The study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permit and the improvements are to be installed prior to first occupancy. 7. The applicant shall prepare a Traffic Report that addresses traffic movements into and out of the project site, including queuing movements into and from the project. The report shall include traffic counts: analysis, evaluation and critique of the existing traffic signal timing, as well as, lane capacities and functions. The report shall address changing the intersection configuration to eliminate on the south leg, the shared through /right lane in favor of two (2) through lanes or two (2) right lanes and explore the possibility of changing the east leg to two (2) left turn lanes and one (1) through lane. The final report shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a dedicated left turn lane on the center of Campus Park Drive driveway. 1 101) Resolution No. 2003 - Page 10 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) NO. 2000 -04 PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. This permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application and as shown on the approved site plan and elevations on file in the Community Development Department. The location of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved site plan and elevations except or unless otherwise indicated herein in the following conditions. Some uses may require additional discretionary approval. A Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department shall be required of all uses in any building. Based upon potential impacts, the Community Development Department may determine that certain uses will require additional environmental documentation. 2. This development is subject to all applicable regulations of the City's Municipal Code, including Title 17, Zoning, and all requirements and enactment's of Federal, State, Ventura County, City authorities, and any other governmental entities, and all such requirements and enactment's shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 3. In the event that the uses for which Commercial Planned Development Permit are approved is determined to be abandoned, the City of Moorpark may, at its discretion, initiate revocation procedures for cause per the provisions of Section 17.44.080. For purposes of this condition, "abandoned" shall mean a cessation of a business or businesses which would render the center unavailable to the public for a period of 180 or more consecutive days. Initiation of revocation procedures may result in the revocation of the permit or modification of the permit based upon the evidence presented at the hearing. 4. Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2) years after this permit is granted this permit shall automatically expire on March 5, 2005. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant one (1) additional one (1) year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent 1 ''C OGW Resolution No. 2003 - Page 11 areas, and if the applicant diligently worked towards during the initial two (2) extension of this entitlemen least thirty (30) days prior permit. can document that he /she has inauguration of the project year period. The request for t must be made in writing, at to the expiration date of the 5. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. The applicant agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his /her sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit. The applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his /her obligation under this condition. 8. Prior to commencement of any use approved under this permit the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building and Safety Division shall be required. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been completed, or applicant has provided a faithful performance surety. At the discretion of the Community Development Director and the posting of surety by the applicant, said on -site improvements shall be completed within one - hundred - twenty (120) days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the surety may be exonerated. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the Community Development Director shall declare the surety forfeited. 9. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. unless approved by the City Council. `024 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 12 10. The hours of operation of the center shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 P.M. On a trial basis, the hours of operation for the service station may be on a 24 -hour basis for one year from the date of the certificate of occupancy of the service station. If anytime, even with the first year, if the hours of operation become a problem relative to the service station use, the Community Development Director, through an office hearing, would be authorized to limit the hours of operation, but in no case less than 10:00 P.M. Action by the Community Development Director would be final and not subject to appeal. Vacuuming of the parking area or the use of any other noise producing equipment shall not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Further requests to extend the hours of operation shall require public notification to property owners within 1,000 feet of the site. 11. Prior to occupancy, those proposed uses which require review and approval for compliance with all applicable State and local regulations related to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, shall obtain the necessary permits from Ventura County Environmental Health Division and provide proof of said permits to the Building and Safety Department. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. 12. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator (s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Community Development Director the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. 13. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the Zoning Clearance approved for the occupancy, either the applicant, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Community Development Director will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area and the terms and conditions of this permit, and if a Minor or Major Modification to the Planned Development Permit is required. A new Zoning Clearance shall be required. All applicable fees and procedures shall apply for said review. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 13 14. No repair operations or maintenance of trucks or any other vehicle shall occur on site. 15. The applicant's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of construction and /or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. 16. The applicant agrees not to protest the formation of an underground Utility Assessment District. 17. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The applicant shall be required to remedy any defects in ground or building maintenance, as indicated by the City within five (5) days after notification. 18. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 19. All uses and activities shall be conducted inside the building(s) unless otherwise authorized by the Community Development Director and consistent with applicable City Code provisions. 20. The applicant and his /her successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 21. The Community Development Director may declare a development project that is not in compliance with the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause, a "public nuisance." The applicant shall be liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or applicable codes. If the applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.080). 22. The applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all City legal service fees prior to Community Development Department or City Engineer's Office initiation of work on Condition Compliance. The applicant shall be required to pay a Condition Compliance deposit pursuant to the requirements Resolution No. 2003 - Page 14 of the latest adopted Resolution Establishing Schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits and shall be required to pay all outstanding condition compliance costs prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. 24. All contractors doing work in Moorpark shall obtain a valid Business Registration Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall obtain a Business Registration Permit from the City of Moorpark. 25. Prior to occupancy, Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all applicable uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850.5 et seq.) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials. Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County, Air Pollution Control District is provided. 26. Prior to Occupancy of any of the buildings, the applicant shall request that the City Council approve a resolution to enforce Vehicle Codes on the subject property as permitted by Vehicle Code Section 21107.7. 27. Prior to occupancy, the subdivider, shall will pay a fee to the City Clerk's Department to scan building permit file, landscape, public improvement, site plans and other plans as determined necessary by the Community Development Director into the City's electronic imaging system. BUILDING AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 28. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. 29. All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, site plans, building colors and materials, sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. 30. Prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the Resolution No. 2003 - Page 15 owner's representative shall apply for a Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Department. The purpose of the Zoning Clearance shall be to determine if the proposed use(s) is /are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the planned development permit. 31. If any architectural or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, all grading or excavation shall cease in the immediate area, and the find left untouched. The applicant shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist, whichever is appropriate to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Community Development Director's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. The applicant shall be liable for the costs associated with the professional investigation and disposition of the site. 32. A utility room with common access to house all meters and the roof access ladder shall be provided. No exterior access ladder of any kind shall be permitted. 33. All existing and proposed utility lines, with the exception of 66 KVA or larger power lines, within and immediately adjacent to the project site shall be placed underground to the nearest off -site utility pole. Undergrounding includes all above - ground power poles and other utilities on the project site as well as those along the street frontage. Should there be any above grade utility fixtures they shall be placed adjacent to or within landscaped areas and screened on three sides. 34. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall pay the following fees in the amounts stated or as may be in effect at the time of the issuance of building permits:: a. Current and Future Park System Contribution Fee, in the amount of $0.50 per gross square foot of building floor area. b. An Art in Public Places Contribution to the City of Moorpark's Art in Public Places Fund in the amount of $.10 per each square foot of building area. Alternatively, the applicant may create a public art project on or off -site in lieu of paying the Art in Public Places fee subject to approval of the City Council. The art work must have a value corresponding to or greater than the fee. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 16 c. A Moorpark Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Fee, the applicant shall pay the City the required TSM Fee at the rate of $10.58 per square foot of gross building area or that in effect at the time of building permit issuance. d. A Citywide Traffic Mitigation Fee, in the amount of $0.50 per gross square foot of building floor area to fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. Commencing January 1, 2003, and annually thereafter, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall be increased to reflect the change in the State Highway Bid Price Index for the twelve (12) month period that is reported in the latest issue of the Engineering News Record that is available on December 31 of the preceding year ( "annual indexing "). In the event there is a decrease in the referenced Index for any annual indexing, the Citywide Traffic Fee shall remain at its then current amount until such time as the next subsequent annual indexing which results in an increase. e. A Tree and Landscape Fee of $0.05 per square foot of gross building areas. f. The Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee. The AOC fee shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time of payment. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated, to the City's satisfaction upon concurrence of the City Manager, the Developer will not have to pay the AOC fee. 35. The Building Plans shall be in substantial conformance to the plans approved under this permit and shall specifically reflect the following: a. Transformer and cross connection water control devices shall be shown on the site plan and landscaping and irrigation plan and screened from street view with masonry wall and /or landscaping as determined by the Community Development Director. b. Fences and walls. C. Bicycle racks or storage facilities, in quantities as required by the Community Development Director. d. Required loading areas and a 45 -foot turning radii shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AASHO WB -50 design vehicle. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 17 36. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the first business, a Master Sign Program for the entire project site shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and approval. The Master Sign Program shall be designed to provide for a comprehensive on -site sign arrangement and design consistent with the shopping center architecture. 37. For all flat roofed portions of buildings a minimum 18 -inch parapet wall above the highest point of the flat roof shall be utilized on all sides. 38. Skylights are prohibited unless approved through the planned development permit process or as a Modification to the Commercial Planned Development Permit. 39. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California, shall be prepared in conformance with Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the landscape and irrigation plan, a lighting plan shall be submitted, with the required deposit, to the Community Development Department for review and approval. 40. Property line walls shall be located no further than one inch from the property line. 41. Exterior downspouts shall not be permitted. 42. Ground - mounted equipment is preferred. Roof - mounted equipment that cannot be ground- mounted may be approved by the Community Development Director. In no event shall roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) be allowed unless architecturally screened on all four sides by view obscuring material(s). All screening shall be shall be maintained for the life of the permit. 43. Any outdoor ground level equipment and storage (such as loading docks, cooling towers, generators, etc.) shall be architecturally screened from view by a masonry wall, the design of which shall be approved by the Community Development Director. 44. Final exterior building materials and paint colors shall be consistent with the approved plans under this permit. Any changes to the building materials and paint colors are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 18 45. Roof - mounted equipment and other noise generation sources on -site shall be attenuated to 45 decibels (dBA) or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupancy. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Community Development Director may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on -site noise generation sources are mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 46. Parking areas shall be developed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.32 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. The parking area shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and raised concrete curbs in lieu of wheel stops, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. All parking and loading areas shall be maintained at all times to insure safe access and use by employees, public agencies and service vehicles. Parking space and loading bay striping shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible for the life of the development. A zone clearance shall be required for any restriping of the parking area. 47. Trash disposal and recycling areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building. The final design and location of the trash enclosures shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. Trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the final construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Community Development Director and the City's Solid Waste Management staff. All trash disposal and recycling areas shall be designed in accordance with City standards and shall be covered to meet the requirements of the National Pollution Elimination Systems (NPDES). a. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, a Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan shall be submitted to the City's Solid Waste Management staff and the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to occupancy of the building. The plan shall include a designated building manager, who is responsible for initiating on -site waste materials recycling programs. This shall include the acquiring of storage bins for Resolution No. 2003 - Page 19 the separation of recyclable materials and coordination and maintenance of a curbside pickup schedule. b. The building manager or designee will conduct a routine on -site waste management education program to alert employees to any new developments or requirements for solid waste management. This measure shall be coordinated through the City's Solid Waste Management staff. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION 48. The final landscape and irrigation plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan approved as part of this permit. The applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape and irrigation plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape and irrigation inspection. The submitted plans shall be accompanied by a deposit to cover the cost of plan check and inspection as specified by the City of Moorpark. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Prior to recordation of the map or building occupancy as determined by the Community Development Director, final inspection shall be completed. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscape and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plans. 49. Prior to issuance of a building permit, three complete sets of the landscape plans, specifications and a maintenance program, prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted. The plans shall be in accordance with the Ventura County Guide for Landscape Plans, or City Guidelines in effect at the time of landscape plan submittal. The landscape plans shall be shown on the City approved grading plan. 50. All manufactured slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be planted for erosion control, to minimize or prevent aesthetic impacts to adjacent property owners, and to mitigate the visual impacts. 51. The applicant shall provide for additional enhanced landscaping equal to or greater than the cost of any trees to be removed as determined by the Community Development Director. Additional trees, which form a canopy, shall be m� Resolution No. 2003 - Page 20 provided to shade parking, driveway areas and other areas as determined by the Community Development Director. 52. The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths, as well as transformer boxes and other utilities within the project limits and street rights -of -way. 53. Plant species utilized for landscaping shall predominantly consist of drought tolerant, low water using species. 54. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 55. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six -inch high concrete curbs. 56. Landscaping shall be designed not to obscure the view of any exterior door or window from the street. 57. Trees shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting, which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 58. Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above ground utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and /or a wall. 59. A fifty percent (500) canopy coverage shall be provided within all open parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at fifty percent (500) maturity. 60. A sufficiently dense tree - planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees and /or shrubs shall be designed. Fifty percent (500) of all trees shall be a minimum of 24 -inch box size in order to provide screening in a three (3) to five (5) year time period. All other trees shall be a minimum 15- gallon in size. Recommendations regarding planting incorporated into the environmental document shall be incorporated into the screening plan as determined necessary by the Community Development Director. 61. Automatic controlled irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping, as identified in the approved landscape plan. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the irrigation system and all landscaping. The Resolution No. 2003 - Page 21 applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the development. 62. All perimeter and /or garden walls shall be constructed prior to installation of any sidewalks or concrete slabs. 63. Elevations of proposed hardscape treatment (such as the building entrance, window and door treatments) shall be submitted with the final construction plans. 64. Prior to final landscape inspection, the areas to be landscaped, as shown on the landscape and irrigation plans, shall be landscaped and irrigation system installed. The City's landscape architect shall certify in writing that the landscaping and irrigation system were installed in accordance with the approved landscape and irrigation plans. 65. Any conflicts between light standard locations and tree locations in the parking lot shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 66. Landscaped planters, decorative landscape pots and other hardscape enhancements shall be installed in front and sides of the buildings subject to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In addition, planters or planter boxes shall be placed at the ends of the fuel dispensers. 67. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit, the applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of an easement to the City to enable the City to maintain all parkway landscaping of the site adjacent to streets (hereinafter "Parkway Landscaping "). 68. The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the Parkway Landscaping. If the City, at its sole discretion, determines that the maintenance of the Parkway Landscaping is unsatisfactory, the City may invoke the aforementioned offer of dedication and assume responsibility for such maintenance at the applicant's expense. The total City cost for such maintenance shall be borne by the applicant through the City levy of an annual landscape maintenance assessment. 69. A Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (herein "District ") shall be formed in order to provide a funding source for City costs for the maintenance of the Parkway and median landscaping, as well as, the Caltrans areas Resolution No. 2003 - Page 22 adjacent to the project and the medians in Collins Drive, in the event the City opts to assume those responsibilities. In order to effect the formation the District, the applicant shall: a. Thirty (30) days prior to the recordation of any map or the issuance of any Zone Clearance for the project, submit to the City a signed Petition and Waiver requesting the formation of the District; and b. Thirty (30) days prior to the submittal of the signed Petition /Waiver, submit to the City the completed and City approved landscaping and irrigation plans for the Parkway Landscaping; and C. One hundred twenty (120) days prior to the planned recordation of any map or the planned issuance of any Zone Clearance, submit to the City: i. the final draft plans for the irrigation and landscaping for the Parkway Landscaping, along with any required plan checking fees; and ii. a check in the amount of $5,000 as an advance toward City assessment Engineering Costs related to the formation of the District. [Note: The applicant shall be required to pay any additional amount required to fully cover all City costs for the formation of the District]. 70. It shall be the intent of the City to approve the required assessment each year, but to levy only that portion of the assessment necessary to recover any past City costs or any anticipated City costs for the following fiscal year. In the event the City is not required to take over the maintenance of the parkway landscaping, the amount of the annual assessment actually levied upon the property would be minor, possibly zero. The City shall administer the annual renewal of the District. Any costs related to the administration of the District shall be charged to the fund established for District assessments and costs. 71. Tree pruning which consists of excessive tree trimming to limit the height and /or width of tree canopy and results in a reduction in required shade coverage for parking lot area (reference Condition No. 60) is prohibited and will be considered a violation of the project approval, and subject to code enforcement. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 23 72. Landscaped areas shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. Parking and associated drive areas with five (5) or more spaces shall be designed to minimize degradation of storm water quality. Best Management Practices landscaped areas for infiltration and biological remediation or approved equals, shall be installed to intercept and effectively prohibit pollutants from discharging to the storm drain system. The design shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) 73. All conditions of TPM No. 5264 shall apply to Commercial Planned Development No. 2000 -04. 74. The following shall be included in the requirements for the permitted use of the property. The City shall periodically review the site for conformance. Repeated violations of these requirements shall be cause of revocation of the permit use. a. All property areas shall be maintained free of litter /debris. b. All on -site storm drains shall be cleaned at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October lst (the rainy season) and once in January. The City Engineer may require additional cleaning. C. Parking lots and drive- throughs shall be maintained free of litter /debris. Sidewalks, parking lots and drive - troughs shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris. When swept or washed, debris shall be trapped and collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent shall be discharged to the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash water shall be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the wastewater treatment plant receiving the discharge. d. All exterior metal building surfaces, including roofing, shall be coated or sealed with rust Resolution No. 2003 - Page 24 inhibitive paint to prevent corrosion and release of metal contaminants into the storm drain system. e. Landscaping shall be properly maintained with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. f. Trash enclosures and /or recycling area(s) shall be covered and have a drain as approved by the City Engineer. All litter /waste material shall be kept in leak proof containers. The area shall be paved with impermeable material. No other area shall drain onto these areas including rainwater. There shall be no drain connected from the trash enclosure area to the storm drain system. However, the drain from the trash enclosure shall be connected to the sanitary sewer and have an automatic seal that shall preclude any escape of gases or liquids from the sewer connection. PLEASE CONTACT THE VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) 75. All driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13' -6 "). 76. An on -site access road width of thirty feet (30') and parallel parking on one side shall be provided. 77. Prior to combustible construction, an all weather access road /driveway suitable for use by a twenty (20) ton Fire District vehicle shall be installed. 78. Approved turnaround areas for fire apparatus shall be provided when dead -end Fire Department access roads /driveways exceed one - hundred -fifty feet (150'). Turnaround areas shall not exceed a 2.5% cross slope in any direction. In addition, show emergency access for hotel, especially turnaround area. 79. The access /driveway shall be extended to within one - hundred -fifty feet (150') of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building and shall be in accordance with Fire District access standards. Where the access roadway cannot be provided, approved fire protection system or systems shall be installed as required and acceptable to the Fire District. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 25 80. Two (2) means of ingress /egress shall be provided to the development in accordance with Fire District access standards. 81. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit two (2) site plans to the Fire District for the review and approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and the Uniform Fire Code prior to occupancy and shall be kept free and clear at all times. 82. Approved walkways shall be provided from all building openings to the public way or fire department access road /driveway. 83. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches (6 ") high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Brass or gold plated numbers shall not be used. Where structures are set back more than 150 feet (150' ) from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event the structure(s) is(are) not visible from the street, the address number(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance on an elevated post. 84. A plan shall be submitted to the Fire District for review indicating the method by which this center will be identified by address numbers. 85. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Fire District for placement of the fire hydrants. On plans, existing hydrants within three - hundred feet (300') of the development. Indicate the type of hydrant, number and size of outlets. 86. Fire hydrant(s) shall be provided in accordance with current adopted edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Appendix 111 -B and adopted amendments. On -site fire hydrants may be required as determined by the Fire District. 87. Fire hydrants, if required, shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standard of the Moorpark Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have two (2) 4 -inch and one (1) 2 -1/2 inch outlet(s). Resolution No. 2003 - Page 26 b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 -psi residual pressure. C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced three - hundred feet (300') on center and so located that no structure will be farther than one - hundred -fifty feet (150') from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be set back in from the curb face twenty -four inches (24 ") on center. e. No obstructions including walls, tree, light and sign posts, meter, shall be placed within three (3) feet of any hydrant. f. A concrete pad shall be installed extending eighteen inches (18 ") out from the fire hydrant. g. Ground clearance to the lowest operating nut shall be between eighteen inches (18 ") and twenty -four inches (24 ") . 88. Prior to Map Recordation /building permit, the applicant shall provide to the Fire District, verification from the water purveyor that the water purveyor can provide the required fire flow of 2,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a minimum two (2) hour duration. 89. Prior to occupancy of any structure, blue reflective hydrant location markers shall be placed on the access roads in accordance with Fire District standards. If the final asphalt cap is not in place at time of occupancy, hydrant location markers shall be installed and shall be replaced when the final asphalt cap is completed. 90. Structures greater than 5,000 square feet and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with current VCFPD Ordinance. 91. Plans for all fire protection systems (sprinklers, dry chemical, hood systems, etc.) shall be submitted, with payment for plan check to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. Note: Fire sprinkler systems with one - hundred (100) or more heads shall be supervised by a fire alarm system in accordance with Fire District requirements. 92. A fire alarm system shall be installed in all buildings in accordance with California Building and Fire Code requirements. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 27 93. Plans for any fire alarm system shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to installation. 94. Building plans of all A, E, I, H, R -1 or R -2 occupancies shall be submitted, with plan check, to the Fire District for review and approval prior to obtaining a building permit. 95. Commercial trash dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within five feet (5') of openings, combustible walls, or combustible roof eave lines unless protected by approved automatic sprinklers. 96. The applicant shall submit a phasing plan to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. 97. The applicant and /or tenant shall obtain all applicable Uniform Fire Code (UFC) permits prior to occupancy or use of any system or item requiring an UFC permit. 98. The applicant shall obtain VCFD Form No. 126 "Requirements for Construction" prior to obtaining a building permit for any new construction or additions to existing structures. 99. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire District. 100. All grass or brush exposing any structure(s) to fire hazards shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Fire Protection Ordinance. 101. Any structure exceeding three (3) stories or 48 feet in height shall meet current VCFPD Ordinance for building requirements. Structures exceeding 75 feet in height shall be subject to Fire District high rise building requirements. PLEASE CONTACT THE VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) 102. In addition to the District's questionnaire, the applicant shall comply with the applicable provisions of the District's standard procedures for obtaining domestic water and sewer services for the applicant's projects within the District. The project shall have a master meter with RP backflow device in each of the two (2) tie -in points within Resolution No. 2003 - Page 28 the public right -of -way. The project may also need to have a separate service line or fire protection. REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION PLEASE CONTACT THE VENTURA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR QUESTIONS (S) 103. The project shall be so designed to control and manage storm runoff to prevent any potential impacts downstream which might arise from the effect of the development. PLEASE CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) 104. Exterior access ladders are not permitted. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 105. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for building permit, all new construction shall comply with public safety measures as determined necessary by the Moorpark Police Department. PLEASE CONTACT THE MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) 106. If applicable, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) 107. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. 108. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, an "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. - End - Resolution No. 2003 - Page 29 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) NO. 5264 PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The Conditions of Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map and all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Ordinance and adopted City policies supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map. Within thirty (30) days following City Council approval of this Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit a conforming Tentative Parcel Map that complies with all Conditions of Approval, provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Municipal Ordinance and adopted City policies, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 2. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his /her heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this map. A notation, which references Conditions of Approval, shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Community Development Director. 3. This Tentative Parcel Map shall expire three (3) years from the date of its approval. The Community Development Director may, at his /her discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one (1) year extension for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas, and if the applicant can document that he /she has diligently worked towards map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the map. 4. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37. The City will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, Resolution No. 2003 - Page 30 action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. a. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: i. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; ii. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. b. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the subdivider approves the settlement. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map or Parcel Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. 5. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 6. The Map shall be submitted in accordance with County Ordinance No. 3982 entitled "An Ordinance of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors Requiring New Subdivision Records to be Included in the County's Computer -Aided Mapping System and Establishing Related Fees." 7. Prior to recordation, the subdivider, shall pay a fee to the City Clerk's Department to scan the Final Map and other improvement plans as required by the Community Development Director into the City's electronic imaging system. 8. Prior to application for grading permit and submittal of a Final Map for plan check, the applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering), and all City legal service fees. The applicant or successors in interest shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review for a Final Map. 9. Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall submit for review by City Attorney, Community Development Director and City Engineer an operational agreement and easement for the purposes of ensuring uniformity and consistency of maintenance of parking, landscaping and lighting, and Resolution No. 2003 - Page 31 reciprocal access and parking within all TPM No. 5264 lots and maintenance of landscaping within the Caltrans right - of -way along the street frontages. The operational agreement and easement shall be recorded concurrently with Final Map recordation. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) GRADING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS 10. The applicant shall submit grading and improvement plans prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval of said plans prior to issuance of any permit for the project. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete all grading, drainage and off -site improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements except onsite lighting. 11. Requests for grading permits shall be granted in accordance with the approved CPD, as required by these conditions and local ordinances. 12. Prior to transporting any dirt to or from the site a haul route permit shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. Surety for the cleaning and /or repair of the streets, as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer, may be required to guarantee compliance with the conditions of the haul permit. 13. All development areas and lots shall be designed and graded so that surface drainage is directed to acceptable locations or natural or improved drainage courses as approved by the City Engineer. Altered drainage methods and patterns onto adjacent properties shall not be allowed without mitigation. 14. ROC, NOx and dust during construction grading shall be suppressed by the following activities: a. The fuel injection of all diesel engines used in construction equipment shall be retarded two degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation. b. All diesel engines used in construction equipment shall use high - pressure injectors. 4 �y\ y \. �.✓ lb Resolution No. 2003 - Page 32 C. All diesel engines used in construction equipment shall use reformulated diesel fuel. d. Construction grading shall be discontinued on days forecasted for first stage ozone alerts (concentration of 0.20 ppm) as indicated at the Ventura County APCD air quality monitoring station closest to the City of Moorpark. Grading and excavation operations shall not resume until the first stage smog alert expires. e. All clearing and grading activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 15 miles per hour averaged over one hour) to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. f. All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. All active portions of the site shall be either periodically watered or treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants to prevent excessive amounts of dust. h. Facilities shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. i. Large scale construction vehicles and trucks exiting the project site during the mass grading period shall be required to have tire wash -downs to minimize the dispersion of dust onto local streets. 15. Grading may occur during the rainy season from October 1st to April 15th subject to approval by the City Engineer and timely installation of erosion control facilities. With the exception of work to effectuate best management practices for erosion control, no construction of any description shall occur during said rainy season unless a revised storm water pollution prevention plan that reflects the construction status of the site has been approved by the City Engineer. Erosion control measures shall be in place and functional between October 1st and April 15th. During each year that the project is under construction, revised storm water pollution prevention plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval no later than September lst of each year from the start of grading or clearing operations to the time of grading bond release. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 33 16. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation operations the applicant shall maintain regular watering operations to control dust. Additionally, the following measures shall apply: a. Water all site access roads and material excavated or graded on or off -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur a minimum of at least two times daily, preferably in the late morning and after the completion of work for the day. Additional watering for dust control shall occur as directed by the City. The grading plan shall indicate the number of water trucks that shall be available for dust control at each phase of grading. b. Cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations during periods of high winds (greater than 15 mph averaged over one hour). The contractor shall maintain contact with the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) meteorologist for current information about average wind speeds. C. Water or securely cover all material transported off - site and on -site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d. Keep all grading and construction equipment on or near the site, until these activities are completed. e. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excessive dust generation. f. Wash off heavy -duty construction vehicles before they leave the site. 17. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled using the following procedures: a. When directed by the City Engineer, the applicant shall take all measures necessary to control wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels. b. Periodically, or as directed by the City Engineer, sweep public streets in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e., fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water runoff, etc.), which may have accumulated from construction activities. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 34 18. During smog season (May- October) the City shall order that construction cease during_ Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during Stage II alerts. 19. To minimize the water quality effects of permanent erosion sources, the following design features shall be incorporated into the project - grading plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The features shall comply with Best Management Practices features including, but not limited to the following: a. Drainage swales, subsurface drains, slope drains, storm drain inlet /outlet protection, and sediment traps. b. Check dams to reduce flow velocities. C. Temporary and permanent vegetation, including grass - lined swales. d. Design of drainage courses and storm drain outlets to reduce scour. e. Stabilized construction entrances. f. Training in best management practices for every supervisor on the project, including all contractors and their subcontractors. 20. The applicant, at its sole cost and expense, may construct those improvements related to grading, storm drains, water, streets, landscaping, erosion and sedimentation control, sewer, and dry utilities shown on the approved Plans (hereinafter referenced as "Improvements "). The applicant shall conform to all conditions of grading and construction (prior to and during) as approved with TPM No. 5264 and this Agreement. The extent of improvements for, and the boundary of, the Project shall be subject to the review and written approval of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. The improvement requirements are described as follows: a. Grading (as shown on drawing numbers to be determined). b. Erosion control measures (as shown on drawing numbers to be determined) as well as all other best management plan measures that are, or may be, required under the r• Resolution No. 2003 - Page 35 requirements of the Ventura County Municipal Storm Water NPDES Permit (Board Order No. 00 -108; NPDES Permit No. CAS004002). C. Street Improvement Plans sheets (as shown on drawing numbers to be determined). d. Storm drain plans (as shown on drawing numbers to be determined). e. Completion of: i. The grading and improvements (as shown on drawing numbers to be determined). ii. The Conditions of Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map. iii. The requirements and conditions of all other city, County, State and all other public or private agency approvals and permits that pertain to said Parcel Map. 21. No clearing, grading, erosion control or installation of temporary or permanent irrigation, landscape, hardscape or related structures or construction of improvements of sewer, water, storm drain, streets, or dry utilities shall occur until the City Engineer and the Community Development Director provide written concurrence that all requirements have been fulfilled for the phase of construction under consideration. 22. The applicant shall pay all plan check and inspection fees, case processing fees and deposits per the City's fee /deposit schedule in effect at the time that review is provided by the City. The applicant shall also process and obtain City, County, State and all other public or private agency approvals and permits for any work to be performed within their respective properties or areas of interest. City approval of the Plans does not warrant that other public agency requirements or standards have been met. It is the applicant's responsibility to satisfy all requirements of, and to obtain the written approval for each phase from all public agencies having jurisdiction and to provide verification to the City Engineer and the Community Development Director of such prior to commencement of the work allowed by this Agreement. 23. All the Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Plans as noted previously on these conditions, all applicable City standards and regulations, all applicable Resolution No. 2003 - Page 36 conditions required for TPM No. 5264 and all accepted construction practices, as determined by the City Engineer, without exception. The applicant warrants that the Plans, as originally submitted by the applicant, accomplish the work covered by this Agreement. Applicant shall complete all work performed under this Agreement in accordance with the Plans. 24. Should the Plans prove to be inadequate in any respect, as determined by City in its sole discretion, then the applicant shall make such changes as are necessary to ensure, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that such Improvements are performed in accordance with said City standards and regulations in effect at the time of construction of the improvements of TPM No. 5264, said accepted construction practices, and approved Conditions of TPM No. 5264. 25. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Planning and Engineering Department for all structures and walls in excess of 6 feet in height. 26. The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all improvements (i.e., grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access ways, temporary debris basins, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. The surety shall include provisions for all site improvements within the development and other off -site improvements required by the conditions as described herein. 27. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a rough grading plan, consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete all on -site and off - site public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all public improvements. 28. The final grading plan shall meet all UBC and City of Moorpark standards including slope setback requirements at lot lines, streets and adjacent to offsite lots. 29. The entire site shall be graded to within 0.25 feet of ultimate grade at the same time. Pads shall be graded, planted and landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and City Engineer. ♦ ',_ 1.."iA9 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 37 30. The maximum gradient for any slope shall not exceed a 2:1 slope. 31. All permanently graded slopes shall be planted with groundcover, trees and shrubs that shall stabilize slopes and minimize erosion or alternative measures to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 32. So as to reduce debris from entering sidewalk and streets, the approved grading plan shall show a slough wall, approximately eighteen inches (18 ") high, with curb outlet drainage to be constructed behind the back of the sidewalk where slopes exceeding four feet (4') in height are adjacent to sidewalk. The applicant shall use the City's standard slough wall detail during the design and construction. The City Engineer and Community Development Director shall approve all material for the construction of the wall. 33. Backfill of any pipe < compacted layers unless Engineer. 34. Soil testing for trench all trenching and shall two feet (2') of lift excavation. )r conduit shall otherwise specif compaction shall be done not less and 100 lineal be in 4" fully ied by the City be performed on than once every feet of trench 35. Observe a 15 -mile per hour speed limit for the construction area. 36. The following measures shall be implemented during all construction activities throughout build out of the project to minimize project- related noise: a. Construction activities shall be in accordance with Chapter 15.26 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. b. Truck noise from hauling operations shall be minimizes through establishing hauling routes that avoid residential areas and requiring that "Jake Brakes" not be used along the haul route within the City. The hauling plan shall be identified as part of the grading plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer. C. The applicant shall ensure that construction equipment is fitted with modern sound - reduction equipment. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 38 d. Stationary noise sources that exceed 70 dBA of continuous noise generation (at 50 feet) shall be shielded with temporary barriers if existing residences are within 350 feet of the noise source. e. Designated parking areas for construction worker vehicles and for materials storage and assembly shall be provided. These areas shall be set back as far as possible from or otherwise shielded from existing surrounding rural residential neighborhoods. f. Property owners and residents located within 600 feet of the project site, shall be notified in writing on a monthly basis of construction schedules involving major grading, including when clearing and grading is to begin. The applicant shall notify adjacent residents and property owners by Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested of the starting date for removal of vegetation and commencement of site grading. The content of this required communication shall be approved by the City Engineer in advance of its mailing and the return receipts, evidencing United States mail delivery, shall be provided to the Engineering Division. GEOTECHNICAL /GEOLOGY 37. The applicant shall submit a detailed Geotechnical Engineering Report certified by a California Registered Civil Engineer for review and approval by the City's Geotechnical Engineer and City Engineer. The report shall include an investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, seismic safety, and discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. The applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative fee for this review. 38. All recommendations included in the approved Geotechnical Engineering Report shall be implemented during project design, grading, and construction in accordance with the approved project. The City's geotechnical consultant shall review all plans for conformance with the soils engineer's recommendations. Prior to the commencement of grading plan check, the applicant's geotechnical engineer shall sign the plans confirming that the grading plans incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report(s). Resolution No. 2003 - Page 39 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 39. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the disposition of any wells that may exist within the project. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed or abandoned per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 or Ordinance No.3991 and per Division of Oil and Gas requirements. Permits for any well reuse (if applicable) shall conform to Reuse Permit procedures administered by the County Water Resources Development Department. 40. Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County, or City right of way, the applicant shall obtain all necessary encroachment permits from the appropriate Agencies. Copies of these approved permits shall be provided to the City Engineer. 41. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 42. The applicant shall utilize all prudent and reasonable measures (including installation of a 6 -foot high chain link fence around the construction sites or provision of a full time licensed security guard) to prevent unauthorized persons from entering the work site at any time and to protect the public from accidents and injury. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, plans for street improvements as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map and by those required by these conditions. The street improvement plans shall be prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer and the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. Public streets shall conform to City of Moorpark requirements or the California Department of Transportation Standards (most recent version), as deemed applicable and including all applicable ADA requirements. 43. The street right -of -way improvements shall include adequate pavement for vehicle turnouts into and out of the project, controlled access exiting the project, under grounding of all above ground utilities, reconstruction of deteriorating Resolution No. 2003 - Page 40 or damaged sidewalk and curb and gutter, street striping, in addition to new concrete curb and gutter, parkways, new streetlights and street signing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer and the Community Development Director shall approve all driveway sizes, locations and configurations and "line of site" exhibits showing all improvements, including landscaping and signing, shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall acquire and dedicate any additional right -of -way necessary to make all of the required improvements. 44. All streets shall conform to the design requirements of the Ventura County Road Standards (most recent revision), unless noted otherwise in these Conditions of Approval. The street Improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 45. Streetlights shall be provided on the improvement plans per Ventura County Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall pay all energy costs associated with public street lighting for a period of one year from the acceptance of the street improvements. 46. In accordance with Business and Professions Code 8771, the street improvement plans shall provide for a surveyors statement on the plans certifying that all recorded monuments in the construction area have been located and tied out or shall be protected in place during construction. DRAINAGE 47. The project shall control and manage storm runoff to prevent any potential impacts downstream which might arise from the effect of the development. 48. The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion of all on and off -site civil and landscaping site improvements within the development and offsite improvements required by the conditions as described herein (i.e. grading, street improvements, storm drain improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) or which require removal (i.e., access improvements, landscaping, fencing, bridges, etc.) in a form acceptable to the City. Onsite lighting facilities need not be bonded. 49. The applicant shall submit wall and landscaping plans showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances. The plans shall be Resolution No. 2003 - Page 41 required with the site grading plans for the review by, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 50. Monuments shall meet the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura Standards and shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All street centerline intersections shall be monumented. 51. Pedestrian facilities shall meet all City and ADA requirements, and shall be safe and visible from vehicle and pedestrian traffic along all streets. 52. The applicant shall prepare a final Traffic Report that addresses traffic movements into and out of the project site, including queuing movements into and from the project. The report shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 53. The applicant shall prepare a report that addresses the locations of unloading of fuel and that it does not create adverse "bottle necks" with onsite vehicular movements. The report shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 54. If car wash facility becomes full service, additional parking and setbacks shall be required and a plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 55. As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each commercial use, the applicant shall be required to pay the City the Los Angeles Area of Contribution (AOC) Fee. The AOC Fee shall be the dollar amount in effect at the time of the payment of the fee. Institutional uses shall pay on the same basis as commercial uses. 56. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans; hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements. The plans shall depict all on -site and off - site drainage structures required by the City. The drainage plans and calculations shall demonstrate that the following conditions shall be satisfied before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major watercourses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 42 Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Flood Control Standards except as follows: i. All storm drains shall carry a 50 -year frequency storm; ii. All catch basins shall carry a 50 -year storm; iii. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; iv. All culverts shall carry a 100 -year frequency storm. b. "Passive" Best Management Practices drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Should there be no feasible alternative, the applicant shall provide a vehicle to permanently indemnify the City from all liability or costs that it may incur through the applicant's use or maintenance failure of mechanical treatment facilities. C. Under a 50 -year frequency storm collector streets shall have a minimum of one dry travel lane in each direction. This applies to all existing streets adjacent to the project. d. Drainage to adjacent parcels or the Public Right -of- Way shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows including onsite detention shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Drainage grates shall not be used in any public right - of -way, private right -of -way or in any location accessible to pedestrians. f. All flows that have gone through flow attenuation and clarification by use of acceptable BMP systems and are flowing within brow ditches, ribbon gutters, storm drain channels, area drains and similar devices shall be deposited directly into the storm drain system and shall be restricted from entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain system shall be extended to accept these flows. Both storm drains and easements outside the public right -of -way shall be privately Resolution No. 2003 - Page 43 maintained. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Downstream storm drain systems may lack capacity. The applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, downstream facilities shall not be adversely impacted. g. The applicant shall demonstrate that developed storm water runoff shall not exceed pre- developed runoff. 57. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad area that the following restrictions and protections shall be put in place to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a. Adequate protection from a 100 -year frequency storm. b. Feasible access during a 50 -year frequency storm. C. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Flood Control Standards. 58. Development shall be undertaken in accordance with conditions and requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 59. All structures proposed within the 100 -year flood zone shall be elevated at least one foot above the 100 -year flood level. 60. The applicant shall provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on -site flows. Facilities, as conceptually approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans. Either on -site detention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off -site property owners shall be specified and provided on the plans. 61. Prior to approval of plans for NPDES Facilities, the applicant shall provide to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Engineering and Geotechnical Reports to prove, that all NPDES facilities meet their intended use and design. These facilities shall meet the minimum requirements relating to water retention and clarification. 62. The design of the storm drain system shall provide for adequate width easements for future maintenance and reconstruction of facilities particularly those facilities that are deeper than 8 feet. In addition all facilities Resolution No. 2003 - Page 44 shall have all - weather vehicular access. This design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. NPDES REQUIREMENTS 63. The applicant shall prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan to address construction impacts from the project on downstream facilities, environments and watersheds. A qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements and recommendations for the use of best available technology. The storm water pollution prevention plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. 64. During site preparation and construction, the contractor shall minimize disturbance of natural groundcover on the project site until such activity is required for grading and construction purposes. During grading operations, the applicant shall employ a full -time superintendent, whose responsibilities will include, without limitation, NPDES compliance. Upon City Engineer's determination that the NPDES compliance effort is unsatisfactory, the applicant shall designate an NPDES superintendent who shall have no other duties than NPDES compliance. The superintendent responsible for NPDES compliance shall: a. Have full authority and responsibility to attain NPDES compliance. b. Have full authority to hire personnel, bind the applicant in contracts, rent equipment and purchase materials to the extent needed to effectuate BMPs. C. Provide proof to the City Engineer and satisfactory completion of courses, satisfactory to the City Engineer, totaling no less than eight (8) hours directed specifically to NPDES compliance and effective use of BMPs. d. Be present, on the project site Monday through Friday and on all other days when the probability of rain is forty percent (400) or higher and prior to the start of and during all grading or clearing operations until the release of grading bonds. 65. Temporary erosion control measures shall be used during the construction process to minimize water quality effects. Specific measures to be applied shall be identified in the \�' �CjS7 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 45 project storm water pollution prevention plan. The following water quality assurance techniques shall be included, but not limited to the following, as required by Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002: a. Minimize removal of existing vegetation. b. Protect exposed soil from wind and rain. C. Incorporate silt fencing, berms, and dikes to protect storm drain inlets and drainage courses. d. Rough grade contours to reduce flow concentrations and velocities to the extent possible. e. Divert runoff from graded areas, using straw bale, earth, and sandbag dikes. f. Phase the grading to minimize soil exposure during the October through April rainy season. g. Install sediment traps or basins. h. Maintain and monitor erosion /sediment controls. 66. The applicant shall prepare a storm water pollution prevention plan to address long term operational impacts from the project on downstream facilities, environments and watersheds. A qualified Civil Engineer shall prepare this plan. The proposed plan shall also address all relevant NPDES requirements, maintenance measures, estimated life spans of best management practices facilities, operational recommendations and recommendations for specific best management practices technology. The use of permanent dense ground cover planting approved by the City Engineer shall be required for all graded slopes. Methods of protecting the planted slopes from damage shall be included. Proposed management efforts during the lifetime of the project shall include best available technology. The avoidance of the use of mechanical stormwater treatment facilities such as clarifiers, separators, filters, absorbents, adsorbents or similar patented devices is strongly encouraged. Should there be no alternative to their use, the applicant shall permanently indemnify the City from all liability or costs that it may incur through use or maintenance failure, in a form approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer, and City Manager at their discretion. The use of biological filtering, bio- remediation, infiltration of prefiltered storm water and similar measures that operate without annual maintenance intervention, that are failsafe, that, Resolution No. 2003 - Page 46 when maintenance is needed, will present the need for maintenance in an obvious fashion and which will be maintainable in a cost effective and non - disruptive fashion is required. The storm water pollution prevention plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and shall gain the City Engineer's approval prior to issuance of grading permits for mass grading. 67. Concurrent with submittal of the rough grading plan a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. The design shall include measures for irrigation and hydroseeding on all graded areas when required by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water shall be used for dust control during grading, if available from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 68. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 69. The SWPCP shall be developed and implemented in accordance with requirements of the Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program, NPDES Permit No. CAS004002. 70. The SWPCP shall identify potential pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges to storm water and shall include the design and placement of recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants from the construction site into the storm drain system. 71. Improvement plans shall note that the contractor shall comply to the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks." 72. Prior to the issuance of any construction /grading permit and /or the commencement of any clearing, grading or excavation, the applicant shall also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Storm Water Permit Unit in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit (No. CASQ00002): Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activities). The applicant shall comply with all requirements of this General Permit including preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). w " , 4 - Resolution No. 2003 - Page 47 73. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres." The applicant shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) to the City Engineers office as proof of permit application. 74. The applicant shall also comply with NPDES objectives as outlined in the "Storm Water Pollution Control Guidelines for Construction Sites." 75. Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall provide facilities to comply with NPDES requirements. Runoff from developed areas shall be diverted to detention basins, "passive- devices" or other passive Best Management Practices (BMPs) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A California registered civil engineer shall propose and design these devices as part of the drainage improvement plans for the project. Provisions shall be made by the applicant to provide for maintenance in perpetuity. 76. Prior to City issuance of the initial grading permit, the applicant shall obtain all necessary NPDES related permits. The grading permits issued for the development shall require the applicant to provide schedules and procedures for onsite maintenance of earthmoving and other heavy equipment and documentation of proper disposal of used oil and other lubricants. The onsite maintenance of all equipment that can be performed offsite shall not be allowed. 77. The project construction plans shall state that the applicant shall comply with the "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" - Best Management Practices (BMPs) applicable to the development and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said requirements shall include the following: a. All onsite storm drain inlets shall be labeled "Don't Dump Drains to Arroyo." b. No outdoor vehicle maintenance shall be allowed. C. The entire project site and any off -site improvement areas shall be maintenance free of litter and debris. d. All onsite storm drains shall be cleaned, using approved methods, at least twice a year, once immediately prior to October 1, the rainy season, and 60 Resolution No. 2003 - Page 48 once in January. Water flushing is not an approved method for cleaning. e. All sidewalks, walkways, and parking areas shall be swept regularly to prevent the accumulation of litter and debris from entering the storm drain. No cleaning agent shall be discharged into a storm drain system. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, wash water shall not be discharged to the storm drain but shall be discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review and approval of the County Waterworks District No. 1. f. The City shall require that "passive" devices and BMPs be used to comply with NPDES water quality requirements. The applicant shall provide the City with a Maintenance Program for such devices. The Operation and Easement Agreement shall include a requirement that the applicant /Property Owner(s) shall maintain, in perpetuity, such devices in a manner consistent with specific requirements to be detailed within the Maintenance Program. UTILITIES 78. Utilities, facilities and services for this project shall be extended and /or constructed in conjunction with its phased development by the applicant as the project proceeds. Any work within the City right -of -way shall require an encroachment permit. 79. All existing, relocated and new utilities shall be placed underground. 80. Any right -of -way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements shall be acquired by the applicant at his /her expense. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install are to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of any Phase of the Final Map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City ") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land, which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 49 b. b. Upon written direction of the City supply the City with: i. A legal description of the interest to be acquired. ii. A map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure. iii. A current Appraisal Report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired. iv. A current Litigation Guarantee Report. 81. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant shall pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. FINAL MAP 82. The Subdivider shall submit to the Community Development Director and the City Engineer a current Title Report for review. The report shall clearly identify all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. 83. Any mapping that requires review and approval by the County of Ventura shall be concurrently submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. Subdivider shall be responsible for all associated fees and review costs. 84. A Final Parcel Map prepared by a California Registered Engineer meeting all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act shall be submitted for review by the City Engineer. 85. The Final Parcel Map shall contain an irrevocable offer of dedication of the easement areas shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. Additionally an easement for public service, public transit, reciprocal access to the lot laying to the south of the development and mutual access between each lot created by the land division shall be provided on the Final Map. The areas offered for dedication and the easement shall provide feasible physical access to the lot laying to Resolution No. 2003 - Page 50 the south of the development and between each lot created by the land division to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All said easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Community Development Director. 86. The land division shall make provisions to provide easements for extensions of all utilities and access requirements, including maintenance and construction. Easements for access and circulation shall be designated as private streets. 87. Any lot -to -lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easement shall be delineated on the Final Map. Assurance in the form of an agreement shall be provided to the City that these easements shall be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. Said agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall include provisions for the owners association to maintain any private storm drain or National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, hereinafter NPDES system not maintained by a City Assessment District and shall be a durable agreement that is binding upon each future property owner of each lot. 88. The Subdivider shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark street and public service easements, as required, by the City Engineer. 89. On the Final Map, the Subdivider shall offer to dedicate access easements to the City of Moorpark over all private streets to provide access for all governmental agencies providing public safety, health and welfare. 90. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City for review and prior to approval, the Subdivider shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an Written evidence of complian City Engineer. easement holder of recorded. :�e shall be submitted to the 91. All areas to be maintained in common shall be incorporated into a common owner's organization as determined acceptable by the City. 92. Prior to recordation of the prepare an agreement which the City of Moorpark and Final Map, the applicant shall indemnifies and holds harmless its agents from future claims Resolution No. 2003 - Page 51 which may result from any landslide, subsidence or other adverse geologic conditions that may occur at this site. 93. As- Graded Geotechnical Report and rough grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Geotechnical Engineer. 94. A final grading certification shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 95. All permanent NPDES Best Management Practices facilities shall be operational. 96. Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 97. The applicant shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required shall be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. 98. All surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall remain in place for one year following acceptance by the City. Any surety that is in effect three years after Zoning Clearance approval or issuance of the first building permit shall be increased an amount equal to or greater than the consumers price index (Los Angeles /Long Beach SMSA) for a period since original issuance of the surety and shall be increased in like manner each year thereafter. 99. Original "as built" plans shall be certified by the applicant's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22" X 36 ", they must be resubmitted as "as built" in a series of 22" X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as built" plans is required before a final inspection shall be scheduled. Electronic files shall be submitted for all improvement plans in a format to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, the applicant shall provide an electronic file update on the City's Master Base Map electronic file, incorporating all storm drainage, water and sewer mains, lines and appurtenances and any other utility facility available for this project. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 52 100. The applicant shall certify to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the recommendations in the reports are adhered to prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 101. On -site private streets, aisles, parking areas, curb, gutter sidewalk, drainage facilities and all other civil facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements for public streets and public facilities. 102. Prior to commencement of any phase of work under this Agreement, applicant shall furnish to City valid and sufficient bonds, executed by a corporation authorized to transact business in the State of California on forms approved by City and with the applicant as principal, for the completion and maintenance of the Improvements in accordance with this Agreement. The applicant shall file with the City, security for the faithful performance of the Improvements to be constructed by applicant and separate security (except for grading and monuments) for payment of laborers and materialsmen who furnish labor or materials to those improvements. Each security shall be good and sufficient on forms approved by the City. Should any surety become insufficient in the opinion of the City, the applicant shall increase said surety, in an amount satisfactory to City, within ten (10) days after receiving written notice from City, which notice can be given at any time by City. 103. Without notice and until exonerated by the City Council, each surety shall be renewed on a yearly basis and shall be increased in an amount equivalent to the increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers - Greater Los Angeles Area for the twelve (12) months that end three (3) months prior to the month in which the bond is renewed. All of the obligations of the applicant under this Agreement shall be met to the satisfaction of City prior to exoneration of all of the bonds. All premiums and costs related to provision of the bonds required by this Agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 104. The applicant shall complete the Improvements no later than two years after start of work, but in no event prior to first occupancy. All Improvements shall be completed to City's satisfaction prior to City acceptance and reduction /exoneration of sureties. All Improvements shall be completed to the City's satisfaction prior to City acceptance and reduction /exoneration of sureties. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 53 105. The City Engineer or his /her duly authorized representative, upon request of the applicant, shall inspect the Improvements. As the City determines Improvements have been constructed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, City shall accept the Improvements as complete. 106. The applicant agrees to pay for all inspection services performed on behalf of City and for the consulting soils engineer and geologist hired by the City. The applicant agrees that no final inspection will be made by the City Engineer until City receives full payment for all related City inspection services, consulting soils engineer and geologist services together with the cost of the time incurred by the City Engineer, City Attorney, Public Works Director, and other City staff in connection therewith. 107. At all times during the construction of Improvements, the applicant shall take all such precautions as may be necessary to limit access to the site to authorized persons only and to protect the site from all members of the public and protect all public and adjacent private property from debris and damage. 108. The applicant shall guarantee against defective plans, labor and materials for a period of one year following City acceptance of the Improvements as complete. 109. In the event any of the Improvements are determined to be defective within the time provided herein, the applicant shall repair, replace, or reconstruct the defect without delay and without cost or expense to City and shall pay all City costs for plan check, inspection and the City's Administrative Costs related to this requirement within thirty (30) days after receipt of City's invoice. Should the applicant fail to act promptly or in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph, or should the exigencies of the situation require that repair, replacement or reconstruction work be performed before the applicant can be notified, City may, at its option, make or cause to be made the necessary repair, replacement or reconstruction. The applicant and its surety shall be obligated to pay City for the actual cost of such work together with the City's Administrative Costs. 110. The applicant shall keep accurate records on a set of blue lined prints of all City approved additions to and deletions from the work, and of all changes in location, elevation and character of the work, not otherwise shown or Resolution No. 2003 - Page 54 noted on the Plan. Prior to the City's inspection and acceptance of the Improvements, the applicant shall transfer this information to a final set of record drawings and deliver them to the City Engineer for final approval and retention. 111. Prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement, the applicant shall file with the City Engineer a written statement signed by the applicant and each public utility serving TPM No. 5264 stating that the applicant has made all arrangements required and necessary to provide the public utility service to TPM No. 5264. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "public utility" shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, a company providing natural gas, water, sewer, electricity, telephone and cable television. 112. In the event that the applicant fails to perform any obligations hereunder, the applicant agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by City in securing performance of such obligations, in addition to cost of any resulting legal action and reasonable attorney's fees. 113. City may serve written notice upon the applicant and the applicant's surety of any breach of any portion of these Conditions of Approval for this Parcel Map regarding grading and construction of improvements prior to recording a map for this property and the default of the applicant if any of the following occur: a. The applicant refuses or fails to prosecute the Work, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence as will insure its completion within the time specified b. The applicant fails to complete said work within the required time C. The applicant is adjudged a bankrupt d. The applicant makes a general assignment for the benefit of the applicant's creditors e. A receiver is appointed in the event of the applicant's insolvency f. The applicant, or any of the applicant's officers, agents, servants or employees violates any of the provisions of this Agreement. 114. In the event notice is given as specified within these conditions regarding grading and construction of Resolution No. 2003 - Page 55 improvements prior to recording a Final Map for this Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant's surety shall have the duty to take over and complete the Improvements in accordance with all of the provisions of this Agreement; provided, however, that if the surety, within five (5) days after delivery to of such notice, does not give City written notice of its intention to so take over and complete the Improvements or does not commence the performance thereof within twenty (20) days after notice to City of such election, City may take over the Work and prosecute the Improvements to completion, by contract or by any other method City may deem advisable. In such event, City, without any liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the Improvements, such materials, tools, equipment and other property belonging to the applicant as may be on the site of the Work necessary therefore. The applicant and its surety shall be obligated to pay City the actual cost of such work together with the City's Administrative Costs. The rights of City provided by this paragraph are in addition to and cumulative to any and all other rights of City as provided by law or equity, and any election by City to proceed pursuant to the provisions noted within these conditions herein shall not be construed as being in lieu of any other such rights. 115. No waiver of any provision of the Conditions of Approval regarding grading and construction of improvements prior to recording a Final Map for this Tentative Parcel Map shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar; nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 116. Unless otherwise changed, notices required to be given to Surety Company shall be addressed to the Surety on file with the City at the time they are accepted by the City. PLEASE CONTACT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITION (S) 117. Prior to recordation of any final maps, including Final Map waivers, the applicant shall submit two (2) copies of the map to the Fire Prevention District for approval. 118. A copy of all recorded maps shall be provided to the Fire Prevention District within seven (7) days of recordation of said Map. Resolution No. 2003 - Page 56 PLEASE CONTACT THE COUNTY OF VENTURA MATERWORK'S DISTRICT REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS) 119. The applicant shall comply with the standard procedures for obtaining domestic water and sewer services for the applicant's projects within the District and comply with the applicable provisions of the District Rules and Regulations. PLEASE CONTACT CALTRANS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S) 120. A Caltrans encroachment Permit is needed in all instances where the proposed work falls within or affects that State right -of -way such as construction, grading, changes to hydraulic run -off, etc. It is recommended that the applicant submit a permit application along with six (6) sets of plans to Caltrans Office of Permits for review. Should there be a conflict between the City requirement and the Caltrans requirement, the more stringent requirement shall apply. - End - TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Honorable Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Direc�o Prepared by Paul Porter, Principal Planners f January 13, 2003 (PC Meeting of 1/27/03) SUBJECT: Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M&M Development. (Assessor Parcel Nos. 514 -0- 160 -045) BACKGROUND On October 28, 2002, this project was heard by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. As a result of several issues discussed at the public hearing, this matter was continued (public hearing open) to a Special Meeting on November 4, 2002, to obtain the applicant's concurrence on the continuance of his applications to January 27, 2003. Concurrence by the applicant was necessary since this would move the decision time beyond the statutory fifty (50) days required by the State Map Act for the land division. The continuance was also necessary in order to allow the applicant and staff the opportunity to address the issues raised at the October meeting. The October 28, 2002, agenda report has been included as additional background. In light of the length of the continuance, on January 9, 2003 staff mailed a courtesy notice of the continued public hearing to the surrounding property owners. DISCUSSION Issues raised at the October 28, 2002, public hearing were: • Protect Access and Circulation CC ATTACHMENT 2 S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D \2000 -04 M &M \Agenda Reports \pc 030127.doc 0 E?0Qf S' Honorable Planning Commission January 27, 2003 Page No. 2 • Alcohol Sales in the Service Station • Proposed Hotel • Hours of Operation of the Service Station • Adjacent Wall Along the Westerly Property Line Bordering the Multi- Family Residential Development Project Access and Circulation: The applicant is proposing three driveways along Campus Park Drive, and one driveway near the west bound 118 Freeway on -ramp on Collins Drive. The City Engineer reviewed the applicant's proposed driveways and suggested conditions to the project which would eliminate the most easterly proposed Campus Park Drive driveway (in the vicinity of the proposed gas station) and that the proposed Collins Drive driveway be restricted to right -in only turning movements. No additional material has been provided by the applicant which would warrant a change in the proposed conditions. The specific conditions recommended by the City Engineer are indicated below and have been included in the proposed resolution: • Improvements to Campus Park Drive shall include a 13z -inch asphalt rubber overlay on both sides of the street; median improvements shall aligned to direct westerly left turn movement from Campus Park Drive to the most westerly driveway, while restricting left turn movements from the site. The easterly driveway shall be restricted to right- turn -in and right- turn -out traffic only. • Improvements to Collins Drive shall include a 1'�,2-inch asphalt rubber overlay; median construction shall prohibit left turn movements into the site; the proposed driveway between Campus Park Drive and the freeway on -ramp shall be redesigned to allow right turn in only (restricting all egress from that driveway); a forty -five (45) foot curb return radius shall be provided at the intersection of Collins and Campus Park Drives. The developer will be responsible to obtain any Caltrans permits and right of way required to construct the necessary street improvements. Alcohol Sales for Service Station: Concern was expressed that the sale of alcoholic beverages at the proposed service station would increase crime in the neighborhood and unsavory characters loitering in the nearby park and neighborhood. To address these concerns, staff suggests adding a condition on the Commercial Planned Development to clarify that the sale of alcoholic beverages without approval of a Conditional Use OCGC(It� 15 Honorable Planning Commission January 27, 2003 Page No. 3 Permit is prohibited. The merits or demerits of whether the sale of alcoholic beverages at the service station would then be part of another public hearing process, which would require notification to surrounding property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Proposed Hotel:_ The public expressed a concern that a proposal for a hotel is an unacceptable land use and would increase traffic in the area to unacceptable levels. The applicant has proposed to eliminate the hotel from the site plan in order to alleviate these concerns. Staff has included a condition of approval requiring the submittal of a revised site plan eliminating the hotel use from the site plan and requiring that any proposed use on the remaining pad require approval of a Modification to the Commercial Planned Development. Hours of Operation for Service Station: Because the applicant had indicated that the service station and mini -mart affiliated with the service station was planned to be opened twenty -four (24) hours per day, several of the public speakers addressed the issue of limiting the hours of the station and the center. Staff suggests adding a condition to the Commercial Planned Development limiting the operation of the center to 10 p.m. and allowing, on a trial basis, 24 -hour service for the service station for one year. If anytime, even within the first year, if the hours of operation become a problem relative to the service station use, the Director of Community Development would be authorized to limit the hours of operation, but in no case less than 10 p.m. Adjacent Wall Along the Westerly Property Line Bordering the Multi - Family Residential Development: The Planning Commission questioned whether the existing six -foot wall along the westerly property line, adjacent to the existing multi - family residences, is necessary considering the site plan design. The commercial buildings themselves provide a buffer from the commercial use for the adjacent residential units, and to reconstruct an 8 -foot high wall at the same location would not provide any more protection. Staff has modified the condition to indicate that the existing wall, with the present gate replaced with matching block is sufficient buffering. OCCIOC9 C Honorable Planning Commission January 27, 2003 Page No. 4 STAFF RECOMMNDATIONS 1. Accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Recommend to the City Council adoption of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration as sufficient environmental documentation. 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2003- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff report and attachments for Planning Commission Hearing on October 28, 2002. 2. Staff report for Planning Commission Special Meeting of November 4, 2002. 3. Revised Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval. 4. Correspondence received since October 28, 2002. Materials provided to Planning Commission under separate cover, and are available for review at the Community Development Department.: 1. Traffic counts prepared by Associated Transportation Engineers. 2. Letter from Associated October 17, 2002. 3. Moorpark Residential October, 2002. Transportation Engineers dated Opinion Poll Addendum V dated 4. Applicant's photographs of East and West Drive on Campus Park Drive. 0 00009 D MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development Dire Prepared by Paul Porter, Principal Planner 4�' r DATE: October 4, 2002 (PC Meeting of 10/28/02) SUBJECT: Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M&M Development. (Assessor parcel Nos. 514 -0- 160 -015, and 04) BACKGROUND On September 27, 2000, the City received applications from M &M Development for Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Permit No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264, a request for four (4) parcel subdivision and a request to construct a 72,285 square foot commercial center, including a service station /convenience store, car wash, fast -food restaurant, retail /office buildings and a 56 room hotel on a 6.28 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive. Over the past two years, several meetings were held with the applicant on a variety of incompleteness items, including, architecture, circulation, and traffic. The final requirements were recently addressed, and the applications were determined complete for processing on June 28, 2002. DISCUSSION Project Setting Existinq Site Conditions: The subject site is an approximately 6.3 acre triangular shaped parcel located on the north side of the 118 Freeway at the northwesterly corner of Collins and Campus Park Drives. The property slopes southerly from Campus Park Drive toward the 118 Freeway. There is about a ten -foot elevation difference from Campus Park Drive to the southerly portion of the parcel. The entire site PC ATTACHMENT 1 OOOO£J E Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 2 is covered with indigenous weeds and brush. Based upon the finding of the soils engineering study prepared by Subsurface Designs, Inc., grading to prepare the site for construction will consist of typical soil removal and recompaction, to a depth of approximately ten (10) feet. GENERAL PLAN /ZONING Direction General Plan Zoning Land Use Site C -2 CPD Undeveloped North M Rpd -5U Residential South FWY -R /W OS Freeway East FWY -R /W OS Freeway West VH RPD -12u Residential General Plan and Zoninq Consistencv: The General Plan designation is C -2 (General Commercial) is consistent with the existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development) zoning of the property. The development of this commercial project as conditioned is considered consistent with this existing land use designation. Project Summary Tentative Parcel Map No 5264: Parcel No. Size (in acres) Size (in sq. ft.) 1 1.46 63,598 2 0.76 33,105 3 0.67 29,185 4 3.39 147,668 Total 6.28 273,556 Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -14: Parcel Pad Proposed Use Building Area (sq. ft.) 1 A Service Station /convenience store 4,800 Car Wash 1,092 2 B Fast -Food restaurant 00 3 C Retail /Office 00 E29,090 4 D Retail - (First Floor 15,519 sq.ft.) Office - (Second Floor 13,571 sq.ft.) E Hotel (First Floor 14,176 sq.ft.) 26,603 Hotel (Second Floor 12,427 sq.ft.) Totall 72,285 00,0009 F Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 3 Proposed Project Architecture: The Commercial Planned Development Permit process for CPD 2000 -04 will establish the design and control for this proposed commercial center. The proposed Eclectic European Village architectural style includes such detailed features as stone veneer, clay barrel roof type, simulated crown molding, awnings, raise pilaster reveals, decorative metal grills, wood arbor trellis, balconies, and simulated wood out lookers and various color combinations which will vary the appearance. Although the measured building heights for the main structures are within the thirty -five foot (35') height limit for the CPD zone, certain architectural elements exceed that height limit, including a fifty -five foot high clock tower. Further discussion of the architectural elements is included in the Analysis section of this report. SPtharkq! The minimum required building setback from Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive is 30 -feet. A 40 -foot setback has been provided from Campus Park Drive and a minimum of 80 -feet has been provided from Collins Drive and the Freeway on -ramp. The minimum required side setback is 5 -feet. Approximately 12 -feet has been provided along the western property line, adjacent to the existing two -story townhouses. The townhouses are located between 27 to 48 feet from the property line. Circulation: The applicant is proposing three thirty (30) foot wide driveway curb -cuts along Campus Park Drive (the northerly property line) and one thirty -five (35) foot wide driveway curb -cut near the west bound 118 Freeway on -ramp on Collins Drive. An existing median in Campus Park Drive currently has a break near the centrally proposed driveway. Recommendations concerning modifications to the applicant's proposal are contained below in the Analysis section. Adequate internal circulation is provided to all proposed uses including accommodation for truck turning movements. Traffic: An August 9, 2002, Traffic Study prepared for this project by Thomas S. Montgomery concluded that the street system in the vicinity of the study site is now operating at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS) and would continue to do so for the existing plus site" traffic condition scenario. The study also concluded that the proposed design of the site access, circulation and parking system is adequate and should not cause significant adverse impacts on the abutting street system. 000009 G Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 4 In order to reduce any potential impacts resulting from additional traffic generated by project, the City Engineer is recommending street improvements to Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive, which are discussed further in the Analysis section. Parking: Pad Proposed Use Spaces Required Spaces Provided A Service Station /Car Wash 22 25 B Fast Food Restaurant 29 29 C Retail /Office 29 29 D Retail /Office 100 100 E Hotel 74 77 Total 254 260 Parking as proposed for the site exceeds Zoning Code requirements. Loading Area: Consistent with Zoning Code requirements, a loading zone (approximately 12 feet wide by 40 feet long) is provided along the east elevation of Pad "C" at the front of the proposed retail /office building. Typically this loading zone will be utilized by small delivery trucks or mail delivery vehicles. Although the service station, carwash convenience store, fast food restaurant, and hotel do not have a separate loading zone, deliveries for these uses will typically take place in the drive aisles in front of the uses during non -peak hours. This loading arrangement has worked well in other centers. Landscaping: Consistent with Zoning Code requirements, this project proposes on- site landscaping along Campus Park Drive, varying in width from ten feet (10') to twenty -five feet (25'). This landscaping is in addition to a four -foot (4') wide landscaped parkway. Proposed on- site landscaping along Collins and the Freeway on -ramp varies in width from approximately five and one -half feet (5 -1/2') to thirty feet (301). However, with recommended landscaping of the Caltrans right -of -way, a landscape area varying from approximately forty feet (401) to eighty feet (80') in width would be provided. Caltrans right -of way issues are discussed further in the Analysis section of this report. Exceeding Zoning Code requirements, a total of 48,009 square feet of landscaping (15.70 of the site) is proposed. Within the 131,917 square foot parking area, there is a total, 31,799 square feet (240) of landscaping. To screen the view of the parked cars from 0 00009 14 Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 5 the public streets, staff recommends that the landscaping be planted on top of earth berms along the streets between the sidewalk and the property line. A condition requiring earth berming is included in the draft resolution. Site Improvements and National Pollution Discharge Elimination Standards Requirements (NPDES): The City Engineer has conditioned the project to provide for all necessary on -site and off -site storm drain improvements including the imposition of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. "Passive" Best Management Practices Drainage Facilities are required to be provided so that surface flows are intercepted and treated on the surface over biofilters (grassy swales), infiltration areas and other similar solutions. Air Qualit According to the 2000 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, the proposed project will produce 29,112 pounds of NOX, which is in excess of allowable 9,125 pound threshold, providing a conclusion that there will be an impact on regional air quality. As is required with all commercial projects, staff incorporates a standard condition requiring a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund to off -set air pollutants, consistent with the 2000 Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines. ANALYSIS Staff analysis of the proposed project has identified the following five areas for Planning Commission consideration in their recommendation to the City Council: • Project Access and Circulation • Caltrans Right -of -Way Landscaping • Building Height • Adjacent Multi - Family Residential Development • Project Phasing Project Access and Circulation: As noted earlier in this report, the applicant is proposing three driveways along Campus Park Drive, and one driveway near the west bound 118 Freeway on -ramp on Collins Drive. The City Engineer has included a condition eliminating the most easterly curb -cut on Campus Park Drive (in the vicinity of the proposed gas station). Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 6 Recommended improvements to Campus Park Drive include a 11-�-inch asphalt rubber overlay on both sides of the street; median improvements to direct westerly left turn movement from Campus Park Drive to the most westerly driveway, while restricting left turn movements from the site. The easterly driveway would allow for right- turn -in and right- turn -out traffic only. A requirement for landscaping within the median has been incorporated into the conditions. Additionally, a condition has been included requiring that an assessment district be established for maintenance of the median and parkway landscaping. Recommended improvements to Collins Drive include a 1;­i-inch asphalt rubber overlay; median construction to prohibit left turn movements into the site; redesign of the driveway between Campus Park Drive and the freeway on -ramp to allow right turn in only (restricting all egress from that driveway) ; and a forty -five (45) foot curb return radius at the intersection with Campus Park Drive. The developer will be responsible to obtain any Caltrans permits and right of way required to construct the necessary street improvements. Conditions have been included in the draft resolution, which address these recommendations. Caltrans Right -of -Way Landscaping: Caltrans owns the approximately eighty -foot (80') wide un- landscaped area that lies between the subject property and the 118 Freeway. A portion of this property is currently utilized by Caltrans as an access road for Caltrans vehicles to maintain the sound wall on the north side of the freeway. It is clear that this un- landscaped area is visually an extension of the center and should be landscaped as part of the overall project. Staff recommends that the developer be required to landscape this area (from the corner to the CalTrans road access gate) and that the entire CalTrans chain -link fence be replaced with a decorative solid masonry wall. A similar requirement to landscape the Caltrans property adjacent to New Los Angeles Avenue was placed on the Moorpark Marketplace, as well as on SDI at New Los Angeles Avenue and the Freeway. A condition has been included requiring the replacement of the existing chain -link fence along the CalTrans right -of -way with a decorative solid masonry wall and replacement of the existing gate with a decorative gate, and road installation of landscaping within the Caltrans right -of -way in this area as well as the island located between the on -ramp and Collins Avenue. Building Height: The Zoning Code limits building height in the CPD Zone to thirty - five feet (35'), without approval of a Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The CPD requires the same public notice and hearing requirements as a CUP. Although the measured 000009 J Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 7 building heights are within the thirty -five foot (351) height limit, architectural elements within this project exceed that limit, including the clock tower element with a maximum height of approximately fifty -five feet (55'). Permitting the higher architectural features that provide visual interest to the design is consistent with prior commercial center approvals in the City. As the functional height of the roof structures without the architectural elements is consistent with the thirty- five -foot (35') allowable height element, this project would be considered consistent with the requirements as specified in the Municipal Code and could be approved as part of the Planned Development Permit. Adjacent Multi - Family Residential Development: The existing wall along the westerly property line, adjacent to the existing multi - family residences, is approximately six feet (61) high. In order to provide a better buffer from the commercial use both during and after construction, staff has placed a condition on the project requiring, that prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the existing wall be increased to a height of eight feet (8') from the highest finished grade. This will most likely require the construction of a new wall as it is doubtful the existing wall was built to the structural standards of an eight foot (8') high wall. The design and wall color is subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. The westerly elevation of the hotel on Pad E includes windows on the second story, adjacent to the existing two story multi - family residential units. In order to reduce potential privacy impacts to the residential units, staff has included a condition that the applicant either install louvered windows or that windows have a minimum bottom sill height of six feet (6'), or as otherwise determined by the Community Development Director. Should the applicant request modification to include windows on the second floors of the westerly elevations of the buildings on Pads C and D, a similar condition would be imposed. Project Phasing: The prominent features that set the tone for the Eclectic European Village architectural theme are provided in the two retail /office buildings. It is staff's opinion that these two buildings are critical in establishing the overall architectural objective of the center. The architecture of the fast food restaurant, hotel and service station /convenience store /car wash, to a limited degree, compliment the architectural style of the retail /office buildings. However, without construction of the commercial /office buildings, the overall theme for the center would lose much of the architectural cohesiveness. 0000G9 Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 8 Because the commercial /office buildings are the foundation for the overall architectural theme of the center, it is critical that the commercial /office buildings, the fast -food restaurant, and service station /mini- mart /car wash be constructed as one phase. Without this combined development the architectural cohesiveness would be compromised. Therefore, a condition has been included in the draft resolution requiring that development of pads A, B, C and D occur in one phase. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment, and based upon an Initial Study and analysis of available information, it was found that there is substantial evidence that the potential effects of the proposed project on the environment will not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore a Negative Declaration is intended to be adopted in compliance with the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing. 2. Consider the proposed Negative Declaration to ensure that it adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed residential project prior to approval. 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -2002- recommending to the City Council conditional approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -4 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Map 2. Project Exhibits A. Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 B. Conceptual Grading Plan C. Conceptual Drainage Plan D. Title Sheet E. Site Building Control Plan F. Floor Plans and Elevations G. Conceptual Landscape Plan 3. Initial Study and Negative Declaration 4. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval 5. Letters 0010009 L Honorable Planning Commission October 28, 2002 Page 9 Provided to Planning Commission under separate cover: 1. October 22, 2002, Letter from M &M Development 2. October 17, 2002, Letter from Associated Transportation Engineers 3. May 20, 2002, Letter from Associated Transportation Engineers 4• May 27, 2002, Moorpark Residential Opinion Poll prepared by M &M Development 5. June 2002, Moorpark Residential Opinion Poll Addendum I prepared by M &M Development 6. July 2002, Moorpark Residential Opinion Poll Addendum II prepared by M &M Development 7. October 15, 2002, Moorpark Residential Opinion Poll by M &M Development 8. October 19, 2002, Moorpark Residential Opinion Poll by M &M Development 9. Photo and Colored Rendering Booklet There documents are available for review at the Communit Development Department. y o000r-9 M O O O `R H H UU ;, SUMMARY LqJ PROJECT DATA I. rwArrrNwllH •1 irlK•an3r al. IM2GT, iAOr Aaa, aatAa AU aASin\ naN lr a\ Or1ib wl OAq 01MN rncrr s v+Y tevaar w i•w<,u� Y nwrNlM N4 MY 1.1rYrr a5•' Up INrrOr aglAaYM.iA10.a[fANrY. PYOir nV•e alo rNr ini•o irowe•Ny <aa w•al 1NgtM w INwY rr•avr RING WnIOI.rMtW Mai OfilR� wa.rw Nw i1aalM/I K. YaN OPrrrY 1 IOY.M r 1NRtaR AW r irri MAr' t AY[r0a\IN[6MM �•a••14•n, iA MI lior ww rN aw waoi• r01aA • \��, aaw'n. IaoscrAOOK+ \, MM la Wr AW. awar •I. AaiGwrKr. tMKN NU «itw MA. V. wMMfY lwQr AIN • v.wa roua• —{F7Tr raww � r��u�1 a.ar ir. IbOir lNwnW ,�r1•IUwI urw, .Aa .,. tax r- ina j <� iM.w AN.r. AL r AO sr•\r COGT1 Tlvm nr< a\[rwr MAV •.w.wl in wal I[iI10�100 Tn0 w •rwaH il. ia, K. AHrAiawwL WY if. Y/Oi ir. IiorOwn 1 Y4aO1.0n1 r1� 11.•7 V. I.swo I o'I teart rAio MAL APAA.. mm \r. lOi t rN •A• l in1'a N•r. l r 1 a a rN •'TlNreiwal T f T � i NY'IMNITWI N ! v • rN 1'Ia1rN lrrWl t YO [MitYi .. rorr rr.w as n aN 5A. • 11•IpK•wO MrLL •NM 81100 w alOWr alaNii rAWM wOwMr AHA. •AN i1 T,W" eIHYCNNo YN.CarAAP• Kar00. IPl V. M rw.L iMf 1I. cwNOrr'/ MA. Ia[i i1 H Enos 1oiY. Oaf r01�U0P1i i3OH. a1 ILL PYOMIi � f• rr1r0a0 W. iwM�,r1LW INYnM 'AIVI volleemm. I.aY�ai., K, arulw i A — n•.uAr. �rw ri v. •r.trriv [ rN ANOaOa .a[0• al<Nl+. airronwl4AIMY, w /r'\ r rorn we . r Yr.! wlwor �G.:i •wKrwO Nwa Yrl r•Mr aNwlrwwarNY.AbI A faa4 H rAN V. 0 r r Y l W \r.uw O •.P aa«0 rar0•r. YAW a1.0 10[10 rrIY00• \lY a1. /4L wrK <.oworaoo wrK wse SAY lns. un /r. MNiI.r•[a•rN rr wrr rs� •Arl ir. W LqJ PROJECT DATA PROJECT TEAM IM2GT, IOH.a[rN alnlbranW prl[r. Hlr w.va,r Or1ib wl OAq 01MN CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Up INrrOr aglAaYM.iA10.a[fANrY. PYOir nV•e alo rNr ini•o irowe•Ny <aa w•al �0� '<'NWiai.4 wer OfilR� YKOiAAaMILNM [RL i1aalM/I K. YaN OPrrrY FAD 'A' OAS STATION / MINI -MART STORE FLOOR PLAN �•a••14•n, iA MI lior ww rN aw waoi• fal RW ifRr INMNr aw vruar. to � IaoscrAOOK+ \, a.waw. <raH.vNava •,[iAr•IalN00a AaiGwrKr. tMKN NU «itw MA. V. wMMfY lwQr AIN • v.wa •M [ WM wwr,4 •w raww � w • rawHm.a Ilv.e rvws•w urw, OWPAW.T. <� iM.w wV<NIN•e1Ya AHY •N [ w iwR, COGT1 Tlvm nr< <.'..•�i Nw. •.w.wl in wal LOT AKA, w •rwaH il. ia, K. t=TKV-AL. -,., aaNml�lr nlurrn �.1AYwt1 I"'.r o'I teart rAio PXW KhL"D LOW. lOi t »W V.N .iPa M11 \Mwl 1Y lAIOaGAR A� µNilGf� gYw1 •MOI AOaaiW v M ir.4Y•\r OR [MitYi .. i�o sNa. u. ri•i 5A. T,W" eIHYCNNo YN.CarAAP• Kar00. W�AO a A}i AK Enos eK 'AIVI volleemm. I.aY�ai., K, arulw i A — KEY MAP r VICINITY MAP 1� IT e al euGCT Wr%=Y A -I TITLE 5HEET ° — A -2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN e al euGCT Wr%=Y �rn weir I.rl wn•r aW M.+Oi ,A.1•W NY/iN A -? PAD 'B' MST FOOD FLOOR PLAN 1 ELEVATIONS A -8 PAD 'B" DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A -4 PAD 'C' RETAIL/ OPFICE FLOOR PLAN A -10 FAD 'G' DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A -11 PAD 'G' ELEVATIONS A -12 PAD 'D' RETAIL - PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN A -15 PAD 'D' RETAIL - PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN A -14 FAD 'D' OFFICES - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A -15 FAD 'D' COMPOSITE / DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANS A -16 PAD 'D' ELEVATIONS A -19 PAD 'D' ELEVATIONS A -I8 PAD b' COMPOSITE ELEVATIONS A -Iq FAD 'E' HOTEL - FIRST FLOOR A -20 PAD 'E' HOTEL - SECOND FLOOR A -21 PAD 'E' COMPOSITE / DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANS A -22 FAD 'E' HOTEL - ELEVATIONS A -25 PAD 'E' HOTEL - ELEVATIONS A -24 PAD 'E' COMPOSITE ELEVATIONS A -25 TYPICAL BLD6. SECTION, SITE DETAILS A -26 TYPICAL DETAILS L -O CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN E -1.00 ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES, LIST OF ELECTRICAL DRAKIN6 SHEETS C -I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN C-2 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN C -5 TENATIVE PARCEL PLAN - - l Cam ue Plaza aIN111.�, e. �51 �g �I E L < 1. �+uw ✓yc A -I TITLE 5HEET ° — A -2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN MM INYM NAbYwli+ A -9 517E / BUILDING CONTROL PLAN A-4 FAD 'A' OAS STATION / MINI -MART STORE FLOOR PLAN Iru ra.laY A -5 PAD 'A' DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN ;....v,.Nw Na-°•' A -6 PAD 'A' ELEVATIONS A -6.1 FAD 'A" ELEVATIONS �rn weir I.rl wn•r aW M.+Oi ,A.1•W NY/iN A -? PAD 'B' MST FOOD FLOOR PLAN 1 ELEVATIONS A -8 PAD 'B" DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A -4 PAD 'C' RETAIL/ OPFICE FLOOR PLAN A -10 FAD 'G' DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A -11 PAD 'G' ELEVATIONS A -12 PAD 'D' RETAIL - PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN A -15 PAD 'D' RETAIL - PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN A -14 FAD 'D' OFFICES - SECOND FLOOR PLAN A -15 FAD 'D' COMPOSITE / DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANS A -16 PAD 'D' ELEVATIONS A -19 PAD 'D' ELEVATIONS A -I8 PAD b' COMPOSITE ELEVATIONS A -Iq FAD 'E' HOTEL - FIRST FLOOR A -20 PAD 'E' HOTEL - SECOND FLOOR A -21 PAD 'E' COMPOSITE / DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANS A -22 FAD 'E' HOTEL - ELEVATIONS A -25 PAD 'E' HOTEL - ELEVATIONS A -24 PAD 'E' COMPOSITE ELEVATIONS A -25 TYPICAL BLD6. SECTION, SITE DETAILS A -26 TYPICAL DETAILS L -O CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN E -1.00 ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES, LIST OF ELECTRICAL DRAKIN6 SHEETS C -I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN C-2 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN C -5 TENATIVE PARCEL PLAN - - l Cam ue Plaza aIN111.�, e. �51 �g �I E L < 1. �+uw ✓yc W LLI N �O V N MN fia n�•w IMwiuw� MMWMa'wrrw�� MO+Y ••«'• • lilsii: �.1AYwt1 I"'.r « 1:•ual..n vw. wp4av ia�wr�v° -- �Ir 5.22.7002 \Mwl 1Y v [MitYi .. 5A. Enos eK 8F6 al<Nl+. A —) �—b w uaxa O]ION N COY► eN uarea. .p.0 �� manna 'YO was COOL1Li a>..a �.1 N r W' V 'I�IW)W MI lr wrvV M Iw.M /V \ O r_ �r ra z ci ■1 wig 2 1p ,i aQ sa�Naa»aa W3HIO WO.r L•V 133N5 »s 11 ri /3nN3AV N V 3 3 d L i Y� Y� Y� Q. y1 a' U' � I l NV'IcJ NOISNaNIG 1N 4 I Y S 6 • I�VIIIi. / / 1 i T. E. I y vim / A I� - II 0 /C7 ITORbE ma 1 r d2mm I HALK -'N COOLGR SL•L-'``■ Al LLAj;Ko jC�!SY - Ll J — r• i 'I KEY NOTES -� ❑i rµR YY(ar rMA 17 MG[R Vww pRW wry Q LNaM1— I''7 YIY�NOUF M�'PC�/Kf 01?M!<olntl�tl CYaI�MA ■164RI:AL RM G3 a.�.. Or¢MR RNirA ruMMf leIACMf �YOS:we. ■e �w.�we nwe � wYwcur.o wfnw wort Uc o fcY:uR rua / rul I i i � i FT�Ii i :rte: ;Iau: li O h y:�: I it ;> ��lqi;�� 5r- �S • r� 'IIiD � i 'I �q� !�djI s E r OZ Q r (L l) u I i �■r�■■r�,■1 ow.5-34•]00] c.w DA • 0 96. M RORO A—T �S • r� 'IIiD � i 'I �q� r�( 1 [�7 FLOOR PLAN -- _— C_YlN�1�1_ w!!t[i t- irP.t�•/e•CM�YAf,aY. wY YeRL Ore. VfwCKr.erce{�. !�djI s E r OZ Q r (L l) u I i �■r�■■r�,■1 ow.5-34•]00] c.w DA • 0 96. M RORO A—T -------- -- i. T, E. I ro/' trM -77 FEM cur C'w 2RIWI L- ; it - SCE Rn DIMENSIONED FLOOR FLAN :Qu :uul: lur bli f anti i r SEE SHEET A -4 FOR OTHER L REFMNCE5 sl lip F z zpin I iL IQ) CN I m i-24-2CV2 "A 86. 4405 AS Norm A-5 SOUTH ELEVATION ED f ffl . . . . . . . . . . . A NORTH ELEVATION LU 1.3 SECOND FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTE5 C.j CJ rij 0 NEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ri —Lo CL V E i'-- kD Ed xx 9-24-2002 W3 AS WTED A-b C) K SOUTH ELEVATION ri NORTH ELEVATION 1 7111=7771� 1 '17 R14 rl SOUTH ELEVATION NE5T ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION KEY NOTES ns Nf!5T ELEVATION uu �� 3 E Ar O PA 66. AS IO(W FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION C) C LS LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION FLCOk'P'LAN -gi `� .'7 7FL +"I p. E 'YJ 0 IL rAM: IM (L IL iu KEY NOTES VININ 4- M" FLCOk'P'LAN -gi `� .'7 7FL +"I p. E 'YJ 0 IL (L IL iu KEY NOTES 4- M" -um PA AS NOW C) C) &i FIRST FLOOR PLAN I 1 ....... --- --- 7r SECOND FLOOR PLAN CL?f 111 4" 4, 0 ' 24-2002 PA. AS NOW A-15 FRONT ELEVATION R16HT ELEVATION •as/ C) O GA I o 4 t u 21 FRONT ELEVATION KEY NOTES Q antrs pwr rpps roe• to �n w.rD w�rrrvu Q .pwt, to rm w iQ a•m� pnr iutn+ QQ rme ••rat nput m traorrar � p.w Qa rKUnv pwp tauwr I+.mp. r ncapua w Q p .rw....•..rrer upt Q• rnsuctcsarwmt � rwe warty Q+ H.trr rr.�.pap at rrw Qn � Mrx. �t �wu Di 1 m r��utrtN wser morx Q �D. \pnMlilNpPt Mp1 p11pML D Dla0U1M IRIL M.. . =1s 1i CL �9 s 5 E U sn Z LU 0 Q LU IL to .,� � YI• pM•I+ •• ..,,1 �•r.,M MI.1 :3 1. D•tt 3 -22 -2002 eur• rr DA. MNYr rV e.s. •tart+ rD. �r0! • cw N N01� ■ rtrtr M. W A® JA\ Q REAR ELEVATION KEY NOTES IMOr I{l a.0 Nt..41YK.M 10 M. [�1 IQ PY4m Q I4u4mJWMI M.Vl4 �/ .T 4Y(■ Q µ.na /.R■In LYl M.L I'MYY Y❑ .Ir4/.[p 4t[YY'MLAa Q UW[Y■.MY■Cnu4N [4Y �i a[wo Q nu Ymw • Q uteta r.e.IwM[ �i YoY..M Q a[ 4Ym Q at4.M .lJJT4\n�t MN MILLI ' . . . N 2. REAR ELEVATION I �9 t ■� J oh,�YU+ ,�• Ql— r y' 1 O IL W .u4 N ii I W [wt•JYiu� •.ub'ul Y•4�.Mr r�■ [VY4 `�4NAwM Fnuil'�Yr u, M '.t• J[oY 9•u -2002 6 OA. 0.6. Al 422.1 ■ MYI M. A-11 FRONT ELEVATION 0 • 1. u u REAR ELEVATION o t•! J 0 +C g (ITlnl(1'. p l W YIY( `KGY MAC 1 ��`• Y RIGHT ELEVATION ,�•�,..,� 0 C F- J WW 1 F •u11 Nux K S 1 Nluf Iv,•r� rN Mlu NnxY10 r�D 1.� 9� DA aaem •r Db. N • N INT[D a run w. A -IS E _.. 1. 0 C F- J WW 1 F •u11 Nux K S 1 Nluf Iv,•r� rN Mlu NnxY10 r�D 19001 Dy •1 WNx 4D'A• +U�i(tw4 Y'.+ rlYr �4x 1 Iiirlixy'Mjr'aNN 1 .V� one 9- 7] -2A0] o•••N •. 6 !� DA aaem •r Db. N • N INT[D a run w. A -IS C) O KEY NOTE! wl .LL wns wi in Q iia na O eYYJIm iMM Li) etttMO1Y{O0Y1{Nr■Y 0 etaln{tean wAiw+ CD rrrwt a NKOIwurIYMNiiIP lY {IiKfYtpi YYYI ?eWt CD eA KOtI W 4OO Y {ri ® wcai.t n a a.wi © mars iur IYMi raoo ro{n { urrulns [y] ewao wnvr tY■ei aunaw.. utw uu Q w.ii.{.. wralww wY.vele ee.Yni Q Yi1N MYw QN etaewrttlAA KAY 11 ri■/Mr 1410 IVII FRONT ELEVATION e It et 11i LEFT ELEVATION uu �� aY R, �9 S � J�)b 0�` G I /eb 1\a���4 J � Z =O tU Q �aQ.w wIIAIO Mtlb Yn YO Y41 n W Ir/ {.n 4 W Ytxill�. iwd< nMin �M1u�7'. IrAWi uwlultlni {Y uitlN W Mfltll d , �ulwni� �wn4Yf �tl y`imµ.«o ui"ruxwitl yyzDD2 OYw H i DA. [y naeno .. p 06. tl � eeeeeeeee�e� 3 .mur va 4409 �t i KR No. A -22 V IO W ffid E -21 ED a] m 12 m [fa REAR ELEVATION KEY NOTES QQ •.or na Q wun. rw«.c.o Q w.uso sme.unmu.. QQ urawsro...une. fil wa.s.our.en.us -.. sm.o.ra.wmso+x.. ID ..a,..a ...�, ., ® oecc,.rvn.e.r�wu. QQ u.... w.rr n.e. weoe ro.n s urosn Q ere.m �wrr nnw oimaaa wow..0 Q ,r�.w.w Sias ICJ ��iii I TR I 7 [�; Floo I'�t�i Lff-111 T-2t] RIGHT ELEVATION uu -, ag yi CL E 90 J Oz � O IIQI�I Q I IL tuJ �i uiin u wa u B �•(0 M�`i.fM��r M�N.� �M FQi` %i wwi ur�n.icua; wns J f�wut40 �ywYl Y �IMtY� Iri 9- 72--2 a Glum tl i[ DA r.msuo n 0.6. M09 " N NDTm rr -- A -23 r • • FRONT ELEVATION .�Y.••e LEFT ELEVATION , Y....•g o.o !a S fir. :e : REAR ELEVATION =1� ny Og oY J J W W W Y�, Y.w✓.t�Yhr �illu.alt YNr� N Y�ipl aiw A Mo.<I f .t .0 <ri l4 Mtl�:��Yi IIV W. w'Itl YVYUI N•M �AUrI Mw �.iIYY 14RYW�inM Y [I�.OYI xM a N�w4 � yyyy 1 B 224002 sIY.Y �i E DA. !� c.ecm �• BA. tl3 N07 yyyB :c AS WORD �I. A -24 ... _w^ .. .... ... ... .... IA[CS AND cM31f ' MIDDLE ZONE CAA ... I. ... �_ .I. VEGETATIVE SWALE/ aria!'/ nu.rl -. BIO FILTER iu n.ij x, ,,,I :. r Y rl .YW I. I• r w M .: I W> I LOCATION OF TRANSPLANTED PINES -} s a ! ;c d I v~ TYPICAL 910 FILTER AREA SECTION 8 -8/ AROS7'EHCTVRB I a k W R (14f0L LR AMRI MEXICAN FAN PALM .. �''- LOCATION OF EXISTING No nwD Aa aunr V'I } PEPPER TO REMAIN �,�AW f..r.laae tr•NINUM� fM FLOWERING PEAR TREE Y. • LOCATION OF TRANSPLANTED PINES T''' ' ' LOCATION OF EXISTING BRISBANE BOX TREE } } + * ,, PINES TO REMAIN "I uusnalx•t.r/ cr}e7r. • ,, -' a { } vawr ruuil w M k M DEVELOPME BOTTLE TREE .'•. �� CAMPUS SHELL ar.uwown (� c. I... Iasi �fii -.fU LONDON PLANE TREE Ld ng1cT: NOTE: LANDSCAPE WILL BE PROVIDED A, cy- IN CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY WHERE - ! y A.. D 0 I CALTRANS PLANTINGS DO NOT ALREADY EXIST. 2/p • n:A .vrermN_ LOCATION OF EXISTING N �„ Y — - HIGHEST ZO MIDDLE ZOK- MIDDLE ZONE- -NKHEST ZONE I�:. \, Q I PINES TO BE TRANSPLANTED TURF TURF TURF TREES AND .. - ' • O TURF , } , N NN¢ •,r .. *.; 1 "rarvu'1: Imn"YN IF, -�}1. � � (/1Y a. _.. + 00 fnv 11TYPICALR10 FILTER AREA SECTION A A + + Xvi'iM Z Q Q PUNT LEGENDc Y U I • f ,.J 11Y TAE _CILY 2. «AYE Ltf 1rY GONY MIYI N[ �� '•A\� CO<</ - U s. INS NS O nu.RwtoN rorWM[a lonu IAEf eplNNr rnmxf sNAUU ]ucx Ar q CAL �� pp OrTI}/e ,•, l'I' � cumNYq wWUAS uuu a «x' D.ur uulsnvox swlw s cu � -�` •` . IR I MNSn IA.MI 14.0 IW[ OK OILAND Mts I] COL. .ANO1A 1116 '"011" "IN' gW«OCW4 /SMWAI ams OWA.I NAVENtY NIYIN INAUI UAq 1 CAL S CAL ``} PIRNE , Y"KRIS N[N I44ND AAA SN.a 3 CAL ^ — nAACTNYMWt O IIw11 CNUIMMiIf GANAII IYIMO rWE IM1flM1 rI11gID.11Y Cols. 'COYIACIUW Cow.Cl p— slD.Y. ]NAY. 1 04 4570 1 .wrwOUns NRMA'nc. Ev.NS' WNA NININDINE sm" s Cu NAIAMYS KE.UW4 IO«NM I4N[ IA[[ IAACKLOSMAIN AAILMNOORS 7A• pl MIa" 1"d'SP.NN swout[I' SIAA USYIMC uunsi -S Sqa NwY/ S a. S 4At — OS -2t -02 Wes. O I1W7 CIIIMIAMA' CMANIMII[I' CIUMIK1Iq HAA rC -1.I. 1w. .sI 1] GL KYANIMII 'WITH AM«C' fgIMKMI lAI 14IW«AL 1 CIA SHADE CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS NEYLIOCNAIS RIAIat DAIULT K-1-4 1 CIt t.r. IS — �taI1TtY (t61IwA CONfEIIA IfH /1x[ IOt FRON'lY IwAff YAAMIIiS }I' ql YWA q IRDA MEW Ulu.o ful PIAM111. I CAL PARKING LOI 12,111 TOTAL LANDSCAPE s 111.070 10. IT. ♦wl 'wy>• ,k LANDSCAPE MAiN.GIgIA tOWS1A LIMA. IW IIW DnlMin pCCIMAIgH Y ON t1GVAxn 1WAlt GtAS1Ef nq0 -AEO uVYIn vw[ s Wl CANOPY COVCAAG[ AT 10 YEARS }S.DS6 51.7 /'^ /� �f/\ CONCEPT p COYfA r�',— GAIL Y,IIKWI. .fAMEO ]EDC[ ..A( -INr /(/� \/�I PLAN YAI.INpN A N D Tar AS NN rYwAcgOS 1[llOw MC ww IM-scat - LAII-3 rxnc u.Iwc mu «us INwl11N1w ..uo . AWMa nn.e on pSN uAf.INf .. _.. "� . ANA .ANUKULUS IENNS CfItr pnt KUr TAR -INr SCALE: 1 40•_0•: O SCItne Fowl INAE(mac IYLUIYSN IIf( -ANT � ' ! �y c� 1 �1 ' o � ^il � `� 1 �' r � � \� � _�,. I _ � - � �7fL !� � :. . -..� .ti`�. -• •• --••ra ° I I I • I , E I It I nnii.a. r.', I I —_- \ ` + 1 I 1 kn i .`� ,y \ r I` ,a►y \� ,` L [ERaN N r 1 1' • r_ 1 u iA !; 6' e ; rte' A j g. �� -�`�• ° ar 4 1. I( I I I I 1 ` � - \�\ � - I ---�- ti--, � - 1 `i �;° � •' 'c �-'� __w• o ,++' ,I►, � I I Iii ' I Ir. A ; •A -i 1 . I n - 111 S ® � � .trv.. , -i�` � m # j4 m! ;�\0 „ .'...�.. •.J. f 'i � � � i I •, I! I I � i i + i = E 1I , T .a (R[TAIL /Arr Ci E) ad IM P°d 'E• •tio• [[an� _ / / Y- P°d •C• \ � I ru n.wj}}•. rm tt..a w 1 run °, w ru Lo �AmN� 2 �` `\ uc- [[srn _ Q- / � _ '_ - - m •ue tons ` _ I i � _ ' ILI,rCEul.3 sKUion r1. ♦ y� _ : 11•. �}�' - -r'<�- - �DLA't1No-� , -_PBOZW! I �i pi I - AVRAM/ 47 I i +�• � _ " +i I II ICLf F '•a \ ^ � V Q c P.e a. I.m "'/ I � � r � -���� I`:I W'tile \�4,4 I Y = y� i n- OM.�MAV I n' I9 rl -I \ • \ � \ � �•` � � � �� .mss - •-- , -- `° - I _� "\ T \ +'� r•Ir ! �� I \ \.; [°euM ...W. r+M L�1 n>F µe� . ` `\ \•i'a.°r\ + '+1, �d c�o'Nwvryi[na.[ iouuo. Sc1LE: •. 3e 'W . r " INT4f[RIDN D[T.\1L 4 y -R`rrr ,.II• I �'+ i P EL 1 ' 'fie „' '�_° -., ♦,. - -' � •� I a I � r_. =�I \ \ -` \ ego \. _ � �\ tmorr r•. d { I � 1ll�ry y a "I •II � urreo/RPAN1ES - \_\ � J .m � ��� ♦� �- -�- ° a �' I J � ;J GENERAL NOTfL. \ \ ` /••\ 'mow -\ / \�� - , 0 m I I I ,~ Iren°neen '� _ -Y VrT 1e,.uALtI. iO a Ww.• • � .\ \` �. -- -y4"'\ ��`� \ __� b ;.; m. T[a :u... n. r.. �_ � ,� ,`,w.l n...a,. r. .r. � \ ° � "\ \' \ \ � - � °�•.'"� . - I I . � ' r� I6 lr • L. :",� «., .,7 . e ter. �'....rr. CITY OF MOORPARK T•T. � `•�'� �I sr'«°� ° • wer.rr.n.ar r.rro re \' \ � + N° I ~ I I I L� � y TENTATIVE PARCEL A, 71 NO. .•e :;_.n_ .. .� �:t� .."�r- MAP 5264 Woos u•[..m ttn.: -mR[e on nwew, n. - - - — '�\ �� \, •_ ~ I I .'�..- i['i.lii: +ue'i . ici.[i r °w.. Aaromlo.ImLtlncawlamuet[nn °o•• •••••u•.••'•°. ax>v¢wtmcttracnutc •eu T SHEET NO • DLVILOPMFM S R CAMPUS PLAZA / CoNbQLTANT'! INC M 8 M DEVELOPMENTI CAMPUS* SHELL' `� \ ° r .WR010. .. ALVYO 1-11 6YllD, cx101er w.+1 count. 011 'Li0'GW &PAW DRIVE °.' �� \ �t T 0 r.ns.1•�r r1e111eL1Ne. etNRLO IORS .n t1.i.W r.L�.nae>et ..tgWMR�[KV0RN4 \ Lt or J rKen _ � 1_ _ �\ \ \ rb6.1f1Y A06••PY IAOLL •!Pa IA06 �.. ••IOC�[IgNy \\ \ Z \ \•� Yi'Jm1f -0, J.�-_�L rl.. Y! rJ..r /J <J! _ „t � - � OENERALOMDINO NOTE$:. IES \ \\�. O •I •4 ELI , 4- -,1_ �`/w ��,, \. J\ �• am I D1 3 IrLL Y rnwoaeQcU. . A NTra$ ry I i �� t I \• \— I . y I CAL[ : . !O ` r_ww /I LOI T1I/ W I /110 \m .. \ 4• \` �,e \ ` .4 , �:, / 4 � 'ru . � i i ,. ' ,w � T! ! ION OEIAIL\ \ J .ti n " � J�,�•' ,�_',' ..,.wn u...... ,...�,.�' I 1 <Id I \ � _ y •� � _J .c.Na�l��.el lS� GENERAL NOTES: <. I V `CO,[ \ < :�• !. n. Y J<w... -.P "NPR ` : «N D a -wR.�r ww, Pua..........�I..n:..m�,.w \-� - \. T "•M IuwP __ e+,n,urn.r.a.ewwewwn.NON< �^`\ �.`. \\ � � 4.4�•� �/� �u- •w��R,. ..ur weR •.�..�u w..w.w�,. .....w.� � .sr w.'-� . •eam..w.w...rw \ G1° '�- - ©.' .may.•.+ ,,..r.n . .o.wN l.rr..•- P.w.wro.Pw<PY / rh A CITY OF MOORPARK \�. �•� �. rn ==!= ;:�...,,,_ TENTATIVE PARCEL ,<. !.. ...._.......�....�. MAP NO. 5264 \ \\ I,, w! [,,,w...N..,.[_..I.. - ,....,w•... - °� ' 04w CONCEPTUALGRADING �,numli r<r m.•<m a <:unwcewnllNlP rtlwl .+.+ lYV4[r l.iRtl OfHilOr L•.00T "Tn ^ NINM1Y[DIOAIHI.- MtDM11l1WIN YTII✓1 ,r,�w ss:YVaw=GGNIE awc - �—�'.. T -PLAN SSHEE7�fA�� IDCVELOrAQ!?r / S R CAMPUS PLAZA CONaULUNI3, INC. M 8 M DEWLOPMENTICAMPUS SHELL \ lwma. . [nOlwtiWl< . Olv- .0I1 -wI cE A, +�tM OA 1561 v.a �srl. couw�rYKOCCC�MinAWDRrvE. .. I I ;.\b�tj ` �4L II i� •i;li. } II f I, II i.I a�y� et r 9 E � I i �I �cn sJ pt . r- 1 IIC 1•EI � C�7 :1' 4 1 — It I I Tr �Z 1 L L I,, A \X-- \4 nd b W • AS A GEN=GRADINQ NOTES: CL-M—M—C.- f u c :-w ry�yee--- , ���\ `' ' ` , 1 ; ,�F, u x lz - am) ZN WTHWORX QUANTMIS comv6 a n "LL ON D&TAIL PA:Ri GENIM NOTES: Coz, =zr C) —N, IN. ........ ...... CITY OF MOORPARK TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5264 \�`� \\` .... ..... L--J AG CONCEPTUA' RAIN I ;=zRmcl S R CAMPUS PLAZA PLAN CONWLT�M, ENC... M A tDEVELOPMENT1 CAMPUS SHELL C. Viso ON-— bft c"" PMX ON" rA lit mg, IM- . T� CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY Project Title: Tentative Parcel Map 5264 Commercial Planned Development Permit Contact Person and Phone No.: 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CA 93021 (805) 517 -6200 Case No.: PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Paul Porter, Principal Planner (805) 517 -6243 Name of Applicant: M &M Development Address and Phone No.: 66 Alviso Drive Camarillo, Ca 93010 Project Location: Southwest corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive General Plan Designation: C -2 Project Description: Zoning: CPD Commercial Planned Development application, CPD 2000 -04, will establish the design and control of a 72,285 Commercial Retail Center and Parcel map will subdivide approximately 6.3 acres into four (4) parcels of 1.60, .76, .68 and 3.39 gross acres. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Residential South: Freeway East: Freeway off -ramp West: Residential Responsible and Trustee Agencies: Caltrans ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a Potentially Si nificant Impact "or Potentially Significant Unless MtigatedI "as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population /Housing Public Services Recreation TransportationfTraffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance None DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DEC RATION will be prepared. Prepared by: Paul Porter Reviewed Xy: Barry Hog Principal Planner omgl ity D e pm Director Date: September 12, 2002 &W `�'l2 -42 000009 66 PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 INITIAL STUDY EXHIBIT 1: NEGATIVE DECLARATION Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact A. AESTHETICS — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X 2) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but X not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 3) Substantially degrade the eAsting visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? 4) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Response: The proposed project is an infill commercial project that will enhance the general area through architectural design. Presently the site is void of vegetation. The introduction of landscaping to the site will serve to enhance the site. Any lighting for the site will be evaluated and be consistent with the City's lighting ordinance. Sources: Project description, project plans Mitioation: None B. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, the City of Moorpark may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 1) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources agency, to non - agricultural use? 2) Conflict with epsting zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? 3) Involve other changes in the e)asting environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? Response: This project does not affect agricultural resources. Sources: Project description, project plans Mitigation: None required. S:\CommunityDevelopment\DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc2 0 00009 HH PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact C. AIR QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable x air quality plan? 2) Violate anyair qualitystandard or contribute X substantially to an ebsting or projected air quality violation? 3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? 5) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Response: The project will produce Project will produce approximately 104.76 pounds of NOX per day or 38,237pounds per year. As a result, the applicant will be required as a standard condition of approval to pay a contribution to the City's Transportation System Management fund. Sources: Project description, project plans and Ventura County Air Quality /Assessment Guidelines of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District November 2000. Mitigation: None required D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or x through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or bythe California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or bythe California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratoryfish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratorywildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc3 OOGO69 11 PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 conservation Response: This project is in an urban location and does not affect natural biological resources. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifcance of x a historic resource as defined in §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological x resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred x outside of formal cemeteries? Response: The project involves the grading and construction of an existing pad which has been previously cleaned and graded, leaving a remote possibility of cultural resources existing on- site.. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required S:\CommunityDevelopment\DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc4 0000169 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact 5) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting x biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 6) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat x Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Response: This project is in an urban location and does not affect natural biological resources. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. E. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifcance of x a historic resource as defined in §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of x an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological x resource or site or unique geologic feature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including those interred x outside of formal cemeteries? Response: The project involves the grading and construction of an existing pad which has been previously cleaned and graded, leaving a remote possibility of cultural resources existing on- site.. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required S:\CommunityDevelopment\DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc4 0000169 PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: 1) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death Involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X 2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 5) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X septic tanks or alternative vvaste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Response: This project will be built subject to compliance with building codes and compliance with all project conditions of approval. All plans will be subject to the review and approval of the City prior to issuance of building permits. The site is not located in an earthquake fault zone. The site is located on a liquefaction hazard zone. Geotechnical measures will be incorporated into the project design as defined in Public Resources Code 2693 © to mitigate any project impacts. Sources: Project description, soils report, project plans Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Map (Simi Valley West, 1999) Seismic Hazard Zone Map (Simi Valley, 1997) Mitigation: None required. S:\Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc5 00 C{: Q C; J KK PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 1) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emission or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 7) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 8) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: This project does not affect hazards or hazardous materials. Safety measure for the gas station as prescribed by regulatory agencies will be incorporated into the project. Sources: Project description and project plans Mitigation: None required X X X X X X X X SACommunity Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc6 0(-)) O0 C 9 LL PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: 1) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? 2) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or of -site? 4) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? 5) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 6) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X 7) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other food hazard delineation map? 8) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which X would impede or redirect flood flows? 9) Expose people or structures to a signiicant risk of loss, X injury or death involving i) flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ii) inundation byseiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Response: All drainage plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. Measures to reduce flood hazards to a level of insignificance will be required prior to issuance of building permits. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. SACommunityDevelopment \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc7 0000169 MM Potentially Significant Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: 1) Physically divide an established community!? 2) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specifc plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 3) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Significant Less Tan With Significant No Mitigation Impact Impact X X X Response: The project will be constructed consistent with City Policies, Ordinances and consistent with the General Plan. Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. J. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: 1) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 2) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Response: The project does not affect mineral resources. Sources: Project description, site plans. Mitigation: None required. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc8 0 0, 00 16, 9 AN PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact K. NOISE — Would the project result in: 1) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 2) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 4) A substantial temporaryor periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinityabove levels existing without the project? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Response: X X X X X X Construction noise will be present, but standard conditions of approval will reduce noise to a minimum. Standard requirements include restricting construction hours. Sources: City of Moorpark General Plan, Moorpark Municipal Code. Mitigation: None required L. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: 1) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly ( for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly( for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 2) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SACommunity Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc9 X X X 000069 00 PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No impact M Response: L© M This project is an infill commercial project which will serve the needs of the existing residents living in the area. And as such will not stimulate additional population and housing growth. Sources: Project description and project plans Mitigation: None required M. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Response: Any increase in service levels will be adequately addressed through standard conditions of approval and agency requirements prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. SACommunityDevelopment \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.docl 0 00- o009 PP PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact N. RECREATION 1) Would the project increase the use of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 2) Does the project include recreational facilities or require X the construction or a )pansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the Response: This commercial project does not affect parks or recreation. Sources: Project description and project plans. Mitigation: None required. O. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the exsting traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacityratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 2) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 4) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X X X X X X X S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.docl 1 O c O Q 6 9 Q Q PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Response: The proposed traffic patterns, median cuts and proposed driveways have been designed to meet City Standards, or the project has been conditioned to require changes to meet City Standards. Ingress, egress and parking are consistent with City Standards. Sources: Project description, site plans, and City of Moorpark General Plan, Municipal Code. Campus Park Shopping Center Traffic Impact Study, August, 2000cprepared by Thomas S. Montgomery, P.E. Mitigation: None required. Potentially Significant Impact P. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: 1) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 2) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 5) Result in a determination bythe wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's ebsting commitments? 6) Be served by the landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid %aste disposal needs? 7) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Less Tan With Significant No Mitigation Impact Impact X X X X X X X Response: The commercial project will be required for consistency with applicable agency requirements and policies prior to receipt of building permits. Sources: Project description, project plans Mitigation: None required. S:\Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.docl 2 0 0-00f PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Tan Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Q. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history of prehistory? 2) Does the project have impacts that are individuallylimited, X but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental efect of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the efects of other current projects, and effects of probable future projects)? 3) Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Response: This infill commercial project is consistent with the City's General Plan, Ordinance Code and other City requirements. Any potential impacts will be reduced to less than significance through the implementation of conditions of approval. Building codes and policies and /or Ordinances of the City and other affected Agencies. Sources: Project description, project plans Earlier Environmental Documents Used in the Preparation of this Initial Study None Additional Project References Used to Prepare This Initial Study One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Studyby reference, and are available for review in the Community Development Office, City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA 93021. Items used are referred to by number in the Response Section of the Initial Study Checklist. Environmental Information Form application and materials submitted as part ofthe project description questionnaire at time of project submittal. 2. Comments received from (departments) in response to the Community Development Department's request for comments. 3. The City of Moorpark's General Plan, as amended. 4. The Moorpark Municipal Code, as amended. S: \Community Development \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 M &M \Environmental \IS rev 030226.doc13 Q PM 5264 CPD 2000 -04 5. The City of Moorpark Procedures for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines adopted by Resolution No. 92 -872 6. Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 14 Section 15000 et. seq. 7. Ventura County Air Quality Assessment Guidelines, November 14, 2000. 8. Soils Engineering Investigation dated October 8, 1999 by SubSurface Designs, Inc. 9. Campus Park Shopping Center Traffic Impact Study dated August 9, 2000 prepared by Thomas S. Montgomery, P.E. SACommunityDevelopment \DEV PMTS \C P D\2000 -04 MWEnvironmentaNS rev 030226.docl4 0000C9 TT Si rely, c i 000009 UU Daniel Patrick Brown 15392 Bambi Court Cl L. Moorpark, California 93021 (805 ) 532 -1820 O Y- 1 � • � October 17, 2002 City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Dear Sir /Madam: As noted by my return address, I am a resident of the City of Moorpark. I have spoken to both the developer (Bill Morehead) and the proposed owner of the new gas station (Brian Doherty) about the Campus Plaza Project. My home sits at the elevated corner of Campus and Collins. I will be literally the nearest residence to the proposed development and, although there are always concerns about noise, lights, gas fumes, and ongoing traffic congestion with such a project, I feel the benefits will outweigh the liabilities - -at least from what I have been shown and told. I teach at Moorpark College and I do think tli- Campus Plaza will potentially help our students, as a nearby gas station and a local fast food restaurant would provide them with additional options. I shall continue to monitor the pro- posal's progress. Si rely, c i 000009 UU ce, ECEi ED UCT 21 1001 City of Moorparx Community Development f/ er /v2 /�✓�'�+ O _ �p�/ 17L6 1/411 E ` f f lr : tZ t.-CV 1,e c cc:� 74-0 CJ t i Ive Gl H , !� e--Y,x ei Z-rr, 00-0009 VV To whoa: it may concern: We live in the Villa Del Arroyo Mobile Home Park and we think that the Campus Plaza would be a good addition to our community. It would be very convient for many people because it would be walking distance and so many things to chose from. We have waited a long time for some- thing like this to come into our community. Sincerly, Mr And Mrs Steven Thompson -. *Lk t -eir "EI EED OCT 2 12002 City of Moorpark Community Deveiopment Thursday, October 17,200Z AmMca Online: Thos oson166 Poe: 1 000003 WW October 3, 2002 City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Dear Sir, �-- rLk r � < < As a Moorpark resident I am writing you this letter in support of the Campus Plaza project being proposed on the Collins and Campus Park Drive intersection. This project is very much in need as it has become very inconvenient to purchase gasoline and/or get a quick bite to eat at a fast -food outlet. I typically purchase these items (and other convenience type items) in Simi Valley simply due to the inconvenience of driving westerly (in the opposite direction of my employ) to find these services. Additionally, I would prefer my tax dollars go to the community which I live. I urge your support of this project and look forward to the convenience this project will offer my family, friends and neighbors as well. Sincerely, _ C' _J_7 7 C r 1l� (- A RECEIVED --unity ry Development xX c r,AM i4 I Al,4z7cy ��t ,A- Ae- cloe,71- e,� /e6APOA K (+ s fir, IV fo / = IED X002 000069 YY Gktjvlr Hilltop October 21, 2002 City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Dear Sir or Madam: G : t5 cur r 1 I am writing this letter regarding the development of the Campus Park Plaza project to be located at the corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Avenue. My office is located on Princeton Avenue near the 118 Freeway. People stop in my office on a daily basis for directions, but more importantly they stop to ask where the nearest gas station is. As a realtor, I frequently assist families relocating here from other areas; the shortage of temporary housing in Moorpark is an issue that comes up more often than not. The community would be enriched not only by the aesthetic improvement and revenues generated, but by the very needed service this project encompasses. As a business owner in, and resident of, the city of Moorpark, I fully support the development of these much - needed services. Sincerely, Li a Toth Century 21 Hilltop - Moorpark 6581 PRINCETON AVENUE MOORPARK, CA • 93021 PHONE: 805 -552 -9999 FAX: 805- 552 -0199 EiJED 2 4 2002 f:�Jvfril: K t l�P,t�L'�O�tf1A111 000069 ZZ MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Community Development DirectI Prepared By: Paul Porter, Principal Planne�,t DATE: October 29, 2002 (Special PC Meeting of 11/04/02) SUBJECT: Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M&M Development. (Assessor parcel Nos. 514 -0- 160 -015, and 04) DISCUSSION This project was originally heard by the Planning Commission on October 28, 2002, at which time the Planning Commission appointed an Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of Planning Commissioners Landis and DiCecco, to work with staff on changes to the project relative to circulation and other traffic issues, hours of operation, land use issues, noise, lighting and liquor sales. The Commission continued the item, public hearing open to November 4, 2002, to allow the applicant time to discuss a longer continuance with his partners. The applicant has provided a letter consenting to the continuance to January 27, 2003. In light of the length of the continuance, staff would suggest that additional notices be sent to the surrounding area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Continue the item, with public hearing open, to January 27, 2003, and direct staff to renotice the surrounding area. Attachment: Memorandum from Applicant waiving legal time frames from CEQA, the Government Code and the Subdivision Map Act. PC ATTACHMENT 2 00000q 444 RU' ' • r HX N0. : Oct. 30 2002 11: 38AM p2 Date: M&MM DEVELOPMENT 66 Alviso Drive Camarillo, CA 93010 MEMOPJMUM October 30, 2002 To: Moorpark Moorpark From: David W. Subject: Extension Planning Commission Communit Development Moreh ad Depa .ytme Due to the controversial nature of applications for Commercial Planned Development No. 2000 --04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 and the potential need for project modifications, M &M Development is hereby waiving time limits in which to complete the environmental documents and render a decision on the project under CEQA (Section 21000 et. seq, of the Public Resources Code), the Permit Streamlining Act (Section 65920 et. seq. of the Government Code) and the Subdivision Map Act (Section 66410 et seq. of the Government Code) through March 31, 2003. ATTACHMENT 000009 888 Paul Porter From: Barry Hogan Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:11 AM To: Paul Porter Subject: FW: Planned Strip Mall Collins and Campus Park fyi - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gloria McCafferty On Behalf Of moorpark Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7 :59 AM To: Roseann Mikos (rmikos @bigplanet.com); Clint D. Harper Ph. D. E. Wozniak (jmwoz99 @aol.com); Patrick Hunter (pdhunt @pacbell.net) Cc: Debbie Traffenstedt; Barry Hogan; Steve Kueny Subject: FW: Planned Strip Mall Collins and Campus Park - - - -- Original Message---- - From: DOREEN E EHRHARDT [mailto:deehrhardt @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:37 PM To: moorpark @ci.moorpark.ca.us Subject: Planned Strip Mall Collins and Campus Park To the City Counsel, (docharper @aol.com); John ; Keith Millhouse My husband and I would like to take this opportunity to voice our opposition to the planned development on the corner of Campus Park and Collins Dr. Moorpark really doesn't need another car wash, gas station or fast food restaurant. The traffic there right now is a nightmare when the college kids get out of class. If you add the above mentioned development to the mix, you'll need to station a Deputy to keep the traffic straight. We also don't need the added congestion to the area. The students from the college drive like it is the Indy 500, with no regard for the little ones walking home from Walnut Canyon School. I think that the corner could be better used for something upscale, rather than another fast food, gas station /car wash strip mall. Thank you for reading our opinion. Lance and Doreen Ehrhardt PC ATTACHMENT 4 O000C-9 CCC Message Page 1 of 1 Paul Porter From: Barry Hogan Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:27 PM To: Paul Porter Subject: FW: Campus Park Plaza fyi. Please make sure that this, as well as all of the other a -mails are made a part of the record. thx - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gloria McCafferty On Behalf Of moorpark Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:33 AM To: Barry Hogan Cc: Steve Kueny Subject: FW: Campus Park Plaza Forwarding e-mail. Gloria McCafferty City Clerk's Department - - - -- Original Message---- - From: k9yoyo [mailto:k9yoyo @mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:49 AM To: moorpark@ci.moorpark.ca.us Subject: Campus Park Plaza The community does not want Campus Park Plaza. It will increase the already frustrating traffic problems, increase crime, noise, litter, and bring transients into our quit community. These transient people have no regard for our neighborhood and will treat it as such. The idea of a gas station is ridiculous. The argument given was so college students don't run out of gas. What a Joke!!! The college is not open 24 hours so even if you buy the Bull S..., the need for the station to be open 24 hours serves no purpose other than to bring people off the freeway into our residential neighborhood in the dark hours. The developers have already attempted to deceive the City of Moorpark with their pin map that was presented at a previous City meeting. This map depicted residents approval of the project when these residents were absolutely against it. Some of the residents marked as approving were not even consulted. These deceptions will continue in an attempt to convince the City to allow this plaza to be built. Do not allow yourselves to be deceived, this project is not good for our community. I hope you are protecting the interests of the community you serve and if you truly are, then you will not approve this plaza. Thank you Neil Goldberg 6677 Pecan Ave. 12/26/2002 0000C9 bbp RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2003 -437 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PERMIT NO. 2000 -04 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) NO. 5264 ON A 6.28 - ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMPUS PARK DRIVE AND COLLINS DRIVE, ON THE APPLICATION OF M &M DEVELOPMENT. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S). 514 -0 -160 -045) WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on October 28, 2002, November 4, 2002 and January 27, 2003, the Planning Commission considered Commercial Planned Development Permit (CPD) No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 5264 on the application of M &M Development for a 72,285 square foot commercial retail center and subdivision of approximately 6.28 acres into four (4) parcels of 1.46, 0.76, 0.67 and 3.39 gross acres located at the southwest corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive (Assessor Parcel No(s). 514 -0- 160 -045); and WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 28, 2002, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing; took public testimony; continued the open public hearing to subsequent meetings; and on January 27, 2003, after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report and any supplements thereto, and consideration of written and oral public testimony both for and against the proposal, has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The Negative Declaration/ Initial Study for the project is complete and has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, and City policy. The Planning Commission considered information in the environmental document in its deliberations of the project before making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the project and the Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission's recommendation represents its independent judgment. SECTION 3. COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying studies, the Planning Commission has determined that this application, with the attached special and standard CC ATTACHMENT 3 000069 EEE Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437 Page 2 Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements of the City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030 in that: A. The proposed use is consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan, and Title 17 of the Municipal Code. B. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding development. . C. The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the neighboring properties or uses. D. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. E. The proposed use is compatible with the scale, visual character and design of the surrounding properties, designed so as to enhance the physical and visual quality of the community, and the structure has design features which provide visual relief and separation between land uses of conflicting character. SECTION 4. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT FINDINGS: Based on the information set forth in the staff report(s) and accompanying maps and studies the Planning Commission has determined that the Tentative Parcel Map, with imposition of the attached special and standard Conditions of Approval, meets the requirements of California Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66474, 66474.6, and 66478.1 et seq., in that: A. The proposed map is consistent with the City's General Plan. B. The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable General Plan. C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. D. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. E. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. F. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at 000069 FFF Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437 Page 3 large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. H. There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. I. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. SECTION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: A. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000- 04, with removal of the proposed hotel use, subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of TPM No. 5264 subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Lauletta, Peskay and Pozza, Vice Chair DiCecco and Chair Landis NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 2003. Kipp A. Landis, Chair 000009 666 Resolution No. PC- 2003 -437 Page 4 ATTEST: Barry K. Hogan Community Development Director Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval 000OCJ PW Special and Standard Conditions Of Approval are a part of the draft City Resolution No. 2003- and attached. Council are not ®00oC.31II TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Honorable City Council ITEM �. _ • ( ?TV fTF ,T�)(iT? ARTS. ( Al,TT -0R. -TA of 5 `. -9CCi7' ��- �iL�Ctctt.c,t�✓ �jt,� Cindy Borchard, Administrative Services Director February 21, 2003 (CC Meeting of March 5, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider an Ordinance Amending Section 3.16.050 of Chapter 3.16 of the Moorpark Muncipal Code Changing the Reporting Requirements of the City Treasurer to the City Council DISCUSSION The City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Section 3.16.050, requires the City Treasurer to report to the City Council concerning all investments made every month. However, Government Code Section 53645(2) (b) requires that such treasurer's reports be submitted to the City Council quarterly. In the past, the City Treasurer has provided these reports quarterly. Because much of the information required to prepare these reports, including Local Agency Investment Fund earnings information, is not available timely, monthly reports would not be practical. The proposed ordinance to require the City quarterly rather than compliance with the practice. STAFF RECOMMENDATION would amend the Moorpark Municipal Code Treasurer to provide investment reports monthly. This will bring it into Government Code and the City's past Staff recommends that the City Council introduce the attached Ordinance for first reading and waive full reading of the Ordinance. Attachment: Draft Ordinance I "`��.0,u i A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.16.050 OF CHAPTER 3.16, INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS, OF TITLE 3, REVENUE AND FINANCE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2 was enacted by the Moorpark City Council on July 20, 1983 to establish the Moorpark Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Section 3.16.050 sets forth the requirement for the City Treasurer to provide periodic reports to the City Council containing information about City investments; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to amend this section to reflect newly legislated reporting requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.16, Investment of City Funds, Section 3.16.050, Reports to Council, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "A. The city treasurer shall make a quarterly report to the city council of all investments made pursuant to the authority delegated in this chapter within thirty (30) days following the end of the quarter. The city treasurer shall submit copies of quarterly investment reports to any oversight committee determined by state law. B. The city treasurer shall annually render a statement of investment policy to the city council which the city council shall review and approve at a public meeting. The statement of investment policy shall be submitted to any oversight committee determined by state law." Ordinance No. Page 2 SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of March 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk To: From Date: ITEM 9• as (JTV OF'b OnRPARK, CAT,TFORNTA City Cnnncil Nfeefing of 3 - 5 -a CIO 3 ACTION' L412,QY-OL :L1 J12-+_F R��cmm Moorpark City Council Agenda Report The Honorable City Council Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works February 24, 2002 (Council Meeting 3 -5 -03) Subject: Consider Resolution Amending FY 2002/2003 Budget, and Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Flinn Avenue Realignment Project [Project 8037] BACKGROUND In November of 2001, the City Council approved the conceptual design for the subject project. The project plans have been completed and the project is ready to construct. It is the goal of staff to proceed with construction of these improvements at this time, so that the off -site improvements for the proposed new Police Station can be completed prior to the start of construction of that facility. DISCUSSION A. Scope of Work The subject project calls for: • the construction of a new Flinn Avenue to intersect Spring Road at Second Street (see Exhibit 1, Pages 1 and 2); • the widening of the east side of Spring Road from Flinn Avenue northerly to the rail crossing (see Ex. 1, Page 3); • the construction of a raised center median in Spring Road from Flinn Avenue to the rail crossing; and Note: The installation of landscaping in that median will be undertaken at a later date. A separate consultant has been retained to prepare the design for that and other landscaping in the area. • the construction of a traffic signal at the new intersection of Spring Road, Flinn Avenue and Second Street. Flinn Avenue Realignment: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 2 B. Spring Road Widening Project Design efforts are proceeding on a project to widen Spring Road south of Flinn Avenue. That project will require acquisition of additional street right -of -way. It is anticipated that the design will be completed within three months and that the required rights -of -way will be acquired by the end of 2003. C. Construction Details Some of the components of the subject project include the following: • Gas, water, sewer, telephone and storm drain utilities will remain in the "old" Flinn Avenue right -of -way. • The existing overhead electrical lines along the "old" Flinn Avenue, will be placed underground in the new Flinn Avenue. This "undergrounding" effort will also include a portion of Minor Street. • The installation of several new street lights. • A water meter will be installed for the future median irrigation system and will be "stubbed -out" to the median, in order to avoid a future street cut. • Irrigation sleeves will be installed from the median to a point south of Flinn Avenue, where future medians will be constructed. • New curbs and gutters will be constructed at their ultimate location, along the Spring Road and Flinn Avenue frontage of the future Police facility. • A sidewalk will be constructed on the south side of the new Flinn Avenue, and on the east side of Spring Road, south of the new Flinn Avenue. • No sidewalks will be constructed on the north side of the new Flinn Avenue or on the east side Spring Road north of the new Flinn Avenue. That work will be constructed as a part of the new Police facility. • The old Flinn Avenue will be left in -place at this time. A barricade will be placed at the west end of the street to prevent vehicular access to and from Spring Road. • A driveway will be constructed at the east end of the old Flinn Avenue, to allow vehicular access to the properties on the south side of the old Flinn Avenue. D. Right -of -Way No right -of -way acquisition will be required to construct this project. The new Flinn Avenue and the added street width for Spring Road, will be created via recordation of a Parcel Map for the Police facility property. flinn_ad - ,,k)74 Flinn Avenue Realignment: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 3 E. Environmental Clearance The subject project has been determined to be Categorically Exempt. F. Street Vacation It is the intent of staff to prepare and process, at a later date, documents necessary to vacate the old Flinn Avenue. That vacation will include action to retain utility easements for the existing utilities to remain in place. G. Ultimate Access to Properties south of Flinn Avenue As mentioned above, the project calls for the construction of a barricade at the west end of the old Flinn Avenue and the construction of a driveway at the east end of the old Flinn Avenue, to allow access for the businesses on the south side of the street. The pavement improvements for old Flinn Avenue will remain in place until the street vacation efforts have been completed. The business and /or property owners affected by these changes have been contacted and notified of these changes. Staff will be meeting with the affected business and property owners in the future to discuss a number of issues, including: • the subject project; • the future widening of Spring Road (and the right -of -way acquisition related thereto); • the planned vacation of the old Flinn Avenue; [Note:Upon vacation of the street, the south one -half of old Flinn Avenue can be conveyed to the properties fronting the south side of the street.] • the ultimate use of the remnant parcel to be created when the street is relocated; • the design for the future ultimate access from the affected properties to the new Flinn Avenue; and • the removal of the street improvements within the old Flinn Avenue right -of -way to be vacated. flinn ad Flinn Avenue Realignment: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 4 H. Fiscal Impact 1. Construction Cost Estimate: A preliminary estimate of project construction and construction related costs is as follows: . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Element Amount Construction Contract 532,458 Edison Undergrounding ** 100,000 Contingency (10 %) 63,246 Total 695,704 ............................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes: * Includes conduits for electrical undergrounding and for new street lights. ** This is only an estimate. Full costs will be known prior to the review of the bids for the project. 2. Total Project Cost Estimate: A preliminary estimate of project costs is as follows: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Element Amount Design 60,000 Right -of -way 2,000 Construction 695,704 Inspection * ** 70,000 Total 827,704 .........................................._..................................................................................................._.._........................................................................................._........................................................... ......................._....... Note: * ** This cost is only an estimate. Staff is in the process of negotiating a contract with a qualified civil engineering firm to provide construction management services for this project. 3. Budget: The FY 2002/03 Budget provides funding for this project [Project 8037] from the Los Angeles Avenue AOC Fund [Fund 2501] and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency [Fund 2902]. A summary of the present status of the budget for this project is as follows: Description Fund 2501 fL A AOCI Design Right -of -Way Construction Inspection Sub -Total Fund 2902 WRAI Design Right -of -Way Construction Inspection Sub -Total Total ...................... . Prior Year ($) 18,805 1,000 0 0 19,805 FY2002 /03 ($) Total 11,195 30,000 10,000 11,000 174,000 174,000 15,000 15,000 210,195 230,000 18,805 11,195 1,000 10,000 174,000 0 15,000 19,805 210,195 30,000 11,000 174,000 15,000 230,000 flinn ad ►`" Flinn Avenue Realignment: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 5 4. Projected Actual Budget Requirements: The estimated revised budget requirements for future project costs are summarized as follows: Description Design, Printing, Etc Right -of -Way Construction Inspection Total FY 02/03 Plus Prior Costs Project Total MRA Fund 2902 ($) 11,195 0 347,852 35,000 394,047 19,805 413,852 .............................. .... ............................... L A Ave AOC Fund 2501 ($) 11,195 0 347,852 35,000 394,047 19,805 413,852 ..................................................... . . . . ......................................... Total 22,390 0' 695,704 70,000 788,094 39,610 827,704 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Budget Amendment: The attached Resolution provides for the amendment of the Budget to fully fund the project cost estimates noted above. That recommended action is summarized as follows: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................................ Description Fund 2501 Design Right -of -Way Construction Inspection Sub -Total Fund 2902 Design Right -of -Way Construction Inspection Sub -Total Total FY 02/03 Plus Prior Year Costs Total Project Budget Current Budget ($) 11,195 10,000 174,000 15,000 210,195 11,195 10,000 174,000 15,000 210,195 420,390 39,610 460,000 Change Revised Budget ($) 0 (10,000) 173,852 20,000 183,852 (10,000) 173,852 20,000 183,852 367,704 367,70 11,195 0 347,852 35,000 394,047 11,195 0 347,852 35,000 394,047 - 39,610 4 827,704 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Note: The main reasons for this budget increase are the addition of the Spring Road improvements to the scope of work and the addition of electrical undergrounding costs. Prior cost estimates for the Flinn Avenue project did not include this work. flinn ad vary Flinn Avenue Realignment: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 6 I. Plans and Specifications A review copy of the Plans and Specifications for the subject project has been placed on top of the file cabinets in the City Council Conference Room. J. Project Approval -- Design Immunity It is recommended below that the City Council approve the project plans and specifications in order to document City Council approval of the scope and design of the project. Such approval is also required for the purpose of establishing design immunity pursuant to Section 830.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. K. Schedule It is anticipated that bids for the subject project will be opened and presented to the City Council in May, with construction to start soon thereafter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt Resolution NO. 2003- 2. Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project. 3. Authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. Attachments: Exhibit l: Exhibit 2: flinn ad Diagram of Street Realignment Resolution V old V ,U- 13- 2001(TUE) 12:24 HAWKS AND ASSOCIATES FLINN IGNMENT 80 0 80 160 SCALE OF FEET PC , Z NORTH Ff 60' SOUTH If 7' 23' 23' 7' Q 2 tq0 RADE 2 . 2Z 2 FLINN AVENUE 5 Curb & Gutter 7 Sidewalk ®80 .� tf► J7' i a4 I Cpl WEST If In I I I I I 7' 7' VARIES II • � I I II 6 I I 74 Q6 Curb 8Q Curb & Gutter Q9 Median �— i4' — 37 R -v _ Q 7' AC OVERLA Y 12��I� 11, WIDENING 4" AC i VAR! =S lq, 8" PUB f__MIN. �29 EAST F� I VARIES GRADE TO 127 MAX. i I I I I I SPRING ROAD GRIND EDGE AND TACK COAT. 3' X 1" TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS GRIND AT JOIN LINE NOT TO SCALE Exhibit 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 02/03 BUDGET TO REVISE THE AMOUNTS OF THE APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET FOR PROJECT 8037: FLINN AVENUE REALIGNMENT [L. A. AVE. AOC FUND (FUND 2501) AND MRA AREA 1 OPERATIONS FUND (FUND 2902)] WHEREAS, on June 5, 2002, the City Council adopted the Budget for Fiscal Year 2002/03; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City Council requesting a budget increase in the aggregate amount of $367,704; and WHEREAS, said staff report discusses certain fund transfers approved last fiscal year and the need to adjust same; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That a Budget amendment in the aggregate increase of $367,704, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be-filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit 'A': Appropriation and Budget Detail _. - -1 U62 E Resolution No. 2003 - Exhibit "A" Revised Appropriations & Budget For Project 8037: Flinn Avenue Realignment A. Fund Allocation B. FY 02/03 Budget Re-Cap .... .. .. .... .. . . .. . . . . ....................................................................................................................... .......... ......................................................................... ...... .. ........ . .. . ......... . . . .. . .................... .. .......... ... ; .... . .. . ................. ... Subject' sject� . . .... ....... .............. .. ..... .. . .. ... ... ............. Revised: FY 02/03 Appropriation: FY 02/03: :Account Number Budget! (Reduction) Budget' ....................... ...................... 183,8 ........... $394,047 1 ................ ......................................... . ........... . .. ......... . . . . ............. . .......... . . ... . ...... . ............................................................................... �2902.8310.8037.xxxx ............................................................................. ............................................................. $210,195: . ....... $ ............. . ... . . ..... . . . . ... . . . .. .......... $394,047 ... . . . ...... ......................... ....... ...... ..... ... . .. .. ...... ..................... . . . . . ... ..... . . . .... . .................................... ......... .. .... . ......................... .............................................................................................................................................................................. $420,390 ................................... . ................................ ..................... .. .... ...... ... .. ................ ........................................... . $ 367,704 ... .. ............................ . . ................ . ... .......... .. . . . . . ............................................................ . ... .......... $788,094 ......... .................. . . . . . . ... .... ..... .......... ............. .................................................... ............................... C. Total Appropriations Re-Cap ........................... ........................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................... . ......................................................................... Revised' ....................... ............................. . ........................ . ................................................................... FY 02/03; Prior Years' Total: 'Account Number Budget; Expenditures' i Appropriations : ................ 01.83 1 0 .8 037. .xxxx ........ .... 7 $ 19,805 $41 3, 8.52 ........ . ...................................... . ... . .... .............. . .. .... I ........... .................................................... 2902.8310.8037.xxxx ...$394,04 ............................................................. ........ .. . $394,047 1 ... .. .............. .. .................. .... ........... $413,852 .......2...5 ............. ..................................................................... . ........ ............... ........................................................... ........... ................................... ...... ................... ................................................. .................................................................................................................................... . . .... . .................................. . ......... $788,094 ................................................... . ..... . .. ............... .... .. .............................................................. ............................................... ....... .. ... .. ...... ............ 1 ............................................................................................ ........................................ $ 39,610 ..... ........... . ...................... ­­ ............................. . . ................. ­­ ....................................................................................................... . $827,7041 . ............. . . ... ... ..................... ...... D. Distribution of Appropriations to Expense Accounts Approved as to form: CQ Mr . _ c. of Moorpark City Council ... c� Agenda Report To: The Honorable City Council From: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works Date: February 24, 2003 (Council Meeting 3- 05 -03) Subject: Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the 2003 Slurry Seal Project BACKGROUND One of the elements of the City's pavement maintenance program is the periodic application of a protective slurry seal to the pavement surface of all of the streets in the City. The program objective is to maintain a bi- annual program (construct a project every other year) in which each project addresses approximately one -third of the residential streets in the City. In this way, every residential street in the City should be slurry sealed once every six (6) years. DISCUSSION A. Proposed Scope of Work The streets included in the 2003 Slurry Seal Project are shown on the maps attached as Exhibit 1. A summary of the scope of the project is as follows: Quantity of Slurry: . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,820 Tons Total Length of Streets in linear feet: . . 91,500 l.f. Total Length of Street in miles: . . . . . . . 17.3 mi. The project will include the application of Type II Slurry on all designated streets. It is anticipated that this year's project will not require any removal and replacement of asphalt pavement, or the construction of any "leveling" courses, prior to the application of slurry seal. The project will include the installation of crack filler material as required, and re- striping subsequent to the application of slurry seal. Slry2003_ad Slurry Seal 2003: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 2 B. Asphalt Overlay Project By separate action, the City Council is also being asked to approve the 2003 Asphalt Overlay Project. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a map showing the streets to be resurfaced by both Slurry Seal and AC Overlay. C. Fiscal Impact 1. Cost Estimate: A preliminary estimate of project costs is as follows: Element Amount Design 14,000 Construction 177,000 Constr Contingency (10 %) 17,700 Inspection ** 14,300 Total 223,000 ........................................................................................................................................................................._.............................................................................................................._.......... ............................. -: ** Note: Inspection services provided by the consultant City Engineer will be augmented by in -house inspection efforts. 2. Budget: The FY 2002/03 Budget provides funding for this project [Project 8002] from the TDA Article 8 Fund [Fund 2603] (Local Transportation Fund [LTF] ) . A summary of the present status of the budget for this project is as follows: Description Design: Fund 2603 Design: Fund 2610 Design Total Construction Inspection Prior Year ($) 3,162 9,239 12,401 I Total 12,401 ........ ........--...... ....................... ......... ... . .. . ..... . ............. --- .......................... - ..................................... _ ........................ . .... ....... ..... ..... ** Note: A portion of prior year expe FY2002/03 ($) 10,838 10,838 400,000 24,000 434,838 - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nses for design Fund 2610: Congestion Relief Grant funds. Total 14,000 9,239 23,239 400,000 24,000 447,239 . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................ : were charged to 2. Projected Actual Budget Requirements: The final budget requirements for the project are summarized as follows: Description FY 02 03 Budget Design, Printing, Etc Construction Inspection Total Plus Prior Year Design Project Total Slry2003 ad FY 02/03 Bud-get 10,838 400,000 24,000 434,838 12,401 447,239 ..... ......... Projected Actual 2,000 194,700 14,300 211,000 12,401 223,401 ................. Surplus ($) (Deficit [$1 ) 8,838 205,300 9,700 223,838 12,401 236,239 .......................... Slurry Seal 2003: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 3 D. Plans and Specifications A review copy of the Plans and Specifications for the subject project has been placed on top of the file cabinets in the City Council Conference Room. E. Project Inspection As mentioned in the Note in Section C -11 contract administration and inspection services will be provided by both the City Engineer's Office and by the Public Works Supervisor. In past years we have found that one inspector at the stockpile site and one inspector in the field, is the best way to assure a quality job with adequate cost control. F. Project Approval -- Design Immunity It is recommended below that the City Council approve the project plans and specifications in order to document City Council approval of the scope and design of the project. Such approval is also required for the purpose of establishing design immunity pursuant to Section 830.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. G. Schedule It is anticipated that bids for the subject project will be opened and presented to the City Council in May, with construction to start in July. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Slry2003 ad Slurry Seal Maps Map [Slurry Seal & AC Overlay] \T1 r' f-'. JI, l� CITY OF MOORPARK c. �[J I i LCS ANCE- pl YI ¢I ?i Aul- U, lkk '6)7 1 fl_2 `,e\ II ,a S V ° RD. CTY UMI'S 3 ? i > 50+00. _.I '`SHE?+1 ♦N AVE. U, lkk '6)7 1 fl_2 `,e\ II ,a S V ° RD. CTY UMI'S ��� SilNi1 'kI13 '13 AOOV3N 3SIaNns C 13 ADaW N 33vab31 r '1S MOV3N a13 3C I✓ a ff�T ^Z, a 3 I< n 3S w" f� IU a D, �o J i I J.Rl i A 3 31 �aO 3�Iwa: as QIA ONVw —, > < I 1 I L1 I O � i i LIMITS ` St u�p� ITE C, CITY LIMITS 00 VC., ,C% �C.,i;= ti. jli eJ . v.. I. � s F ITEM q � • CITY OF N10ORPARK, CAVIVORNiA City Cmincii Nlreting of 3 -5- v�U0 ►1G 1 ud v1 a a C vn Moorpark City Council z ©3 - Z�� - -`'� Agenda Report`' To: The Honorable City Council, From: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works Date: February 24, 2003 (Council Meeting 3- 05 -03) Subject: Consider Resolution Amending FY 2002/2003 Budget, and Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Asphalt Overlay 2003 Project [Project 8011] DISCUSSION A. Project Scope Attached as Exhibit streets included in list of the affected B. Tierra Relada Road 1 is a map showing the location of the the subject asphalt overlay project. A streets is included in that Exhibit. It is the intent of staff to expand the scope of work described above, to include repairs to the pavement failures we have been experiencing at `seam lines" along the entire length of Tierra Rejada Road. The repair methods to be used will range from crack filling to removal and replacement of patch areas. The design for this additional work is being prepared. It is anticipated that a construct cost estimate for this additional work will be available at the March 5 meeting. The City Council will be asked to approve a scope of work to include this additional work. C. Slurry Seal Project By separate action, the City approve the 2003 Slurry Seal is a map showing the streets Seal and AC Overlay. The Slurry Seal contractor and coordinate and cooperate. Ac overlay 2003 ad Council is also being asked to Project. Attached as Exhibit 2 to be resurfaced by both Slurry contract documents require the the AC Overlay contractor to '�.;.'fir'0092 Asphalt Overlay 2003: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 2 D. Plans and Specifications A review copy of the Plans and Specifications has been placed in the City Council Conference Room. E. Project Approval -- Design Immunity It is recommended below that the City Council approve the project plans and specifications in order to document City Council approval of the scope and design of the project. Such approval is also required for the purpose of establishing design immunity pursuant to Section 830.6 of the Government Code of the State of California. F. Schedule Bids for the subject project will be presented to the City Council in May, with construction commencing in June. G. Fiscal Impact 1. Cost Estimate: A preliminary estimate of project costs is as follows: ........ Element Design Construction Constr Contingency (10 %) Inspection Total .......................... Amount 87,000 1,526,000 152,600 50,701 1,816,301 . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................... . . Note: The above cost estimate includes an estimated $300,000 for the Tierra Rejada Road pavement remediation efforts discussed in Section B. If necessary this amount will be revised to reflect the final estimated expected to be available on March 5. 2. Current Budget Summary: The subject project is currently funded by the Local Transportation Fund [Fund 26031 and an anticipated Congestion Relief Grant. A summary of the current budget for the project is as follows: ........... ............................... ............... ........................... ...._ Prior Year FY 02/03 Total Description Expenses ($) Budget Budget Fund 2603 - LTF Design Construction Inspection Sub -Total 2610 - Congestion Relief Construction Sub -Total _ Total Ac Overlay 2003 ad 28,698 51,302 80,000 - 400,000 400,000 50,701 50,701 28,698 502,003 530,701 16,757 16,757 16,757 16,757 28,698 518,760 547,458 Asphalt Overlay 2003: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 3 3. Project Requirements: The funding requirements for the project are summarized as follows: 4. Budget Increase: At the time the FY02 /03 Budget was adopted, the scope of the AC Overlay requirements were not known. The Budget amount of $530,000 was merely an estimate. During the development of the design, it was determined that the scope and cost of this project was significantly higher than the June 2002 estimate. 5. Budget Amendment: It will 02/03 Budget to fully fund Budget Amendment set forth summarized as follows: Description Fund 2603 - LTF Design Construction Inspection Current Budget 51,302 400,000 50,701 Sub -Total 502,003 2610 - Congestion Relief Construction 16,757 Total Budget 518,760 Plus Prior Years Design Costs Total Project be necessary to amend the FY this project. The recommended in the attached Resolution is Revised Change Bud et 7,000 58,302 1,278,600 1,678,600 50.701 1,285,600 1,787,603 (16,757) 1,268,843 1,787,603 28,698 1,816,301 _ .............................. _... ... _.........................................._............................_._ ................... _._ .......... . 6. Congestion Relief Fund: This State grant funding source was recently deleted as a part of the Governors cost reduction measures. Accordingly, the attached Resolution, and the above summary, deletes this revenue source. Ac Overlay 2003 ad r q Prior Year Current and Total', Description Expenses ($) Future Exp. ($) Pro'ect Design 28,698 58,302 87,000 Construction - 1,678,600 1,678,600 Inspection - 50,701 50,701 Total 28,698 1,787,603 1,816,301 4. Budget Increase: At the time the FY02 /03 Budget was adopted, the scope of the AC Overlay requirements were not known. The Budget amount of $530,000 was merely an estimate. During the development of the design, it was determined that the scope and cost of this project was significantly higher than the June 2002 estimate. 5. Budget Amendment: It will 02/03 Budget to fully fund Budget Amendment set forth summarized as follows: Description Fund 2603 - LTF Design Construction Inspection Current Budget 51,302 400,000 50,701 Sub -Total 502,003 2610 - Congestion Relief Construction 16,757 Total Budget 518,760 Plus Prior Years Design Costs Total Project be necessary to amend the FY this project. The recommended in the attached Resolution is Revised Change Bud et 7,000 58,302 1,278,600 1,678,600 50.701 1,285,600 1,787,603 (16,757) 1,268,843 1,787,603 28,698 1,816,301 _ .............................. _... ... _.........................................._............................_._ ................... _._ .......... . 6. Congestion Relief Fund: This State grant funding source was recently deleted as a part of the Governors cost reduction measures. Accordingly, the attached Resolution, and the above summary, deletes this revenue source. Ac Overlay 2003 ad r q Asphalt Overlay 2003: Advertise February 24, 2003 Page 4 7. Fund Balances: It will be necessary to amend the FY 02/03 Budget to fully fund this project. The recommended Budget Amendment set forth in the attached Resolution is summarized as follows: Description Current Unappropriated Fund Balance [6/30/03] Effect of Attached Resolution Sub -Total Plus Surplus from Slurry Seal Project Total ................... . STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2605: Gas Tax Fund ($1 2603: LTF ($) Total 1,022,319 1,645,261 2,667,580 - (1,285.600) (1,285,600)', 1,022,319 359,661 1,381,980 230,000 230,000 1,022,319 589,661 1,611,980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . Adopt the attached Resolution, approve the plans and specifications for the subject project, approve the addition to the scope of work AC pavement remedial work on Tierra Rejada Road and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction. Attachments: Exhibit l: AC Overlay Map Exhibit 2: Map: Slurry Seal Exhibit 3: Resolution Ac Overlay 2003 ad & AC Overlay Projects � CITY OF MOORPARK I-- r L OR ✓f- r! I YI I WI >j I -A A T- I D:A9L" ¢11 AV CHAPARRAL `- ^ ^M� a TOLE _ _r v SCHOOL uI,L�S�E > �.0 > IAVL a Z • "y^ 71I >`'AOV�N LASS N r I I'Z al I a 2 W AVE AL �'ICE � � " > W, WI ;C yERY A Z! 7 z IW =1 la = ARE. or J. AVE" LCS ANGELES° —ws -3 DEER MEADOW ST. 4 TERRACE MEADOW CT. .3 SUNRISE MEADOW CT. CORAL oti CHESTNLT' �� �SILV RC4ESr ti CREST T. CQTST� vU C CT. 2 �� •'Nr `ldi � aJ rI r;K =S C. F I 7CH AVE., Z' AVE z u vl ASSE'o AV0 ;?CBE97S AVE 2-0-D ST­ Ay J.. Fi- ELEK -(I 4 SC�40[)L NEW (HWY. lie) Z' > MA 'ES'IC -4- C, x I ESTCA E Q a Z - 2 BROCKDALE Lm.::: COMMUNITY PARK 7 -- - - - _J LANTERN ICED ­.. 4 LANTERN LN. .4 L 5 A-BIRV�CK LK A� -NA Ca D , z 6 R NVOC Lk 'B'N:A -CIG,TS 11 AOL- PL DEER MEADOW ST. PP ! I > ST. 4 TERRACE ME40CW CT 5 SUNRISE MEACCV CT. 63 If LERION 'VTA > CKSTCRrt 4, c SO GA A LEVANA Lj cy z F --I I M A p u 0 KN I L 1, VE PEACH HILL GR RD. ti SAO z u LAURE . 0 CvS. K CD PINE ST. 6 c A .M S I�ES) SL NNE- T pWy > c: it y $T 10 < UAIL SUMMIT I E 7/11 PALMONI ISAS SMOKE L V ST. SUM �JA IR ST. _R ER E C' - OL SO "t��'ME LFt ST z lk cl .E. T RUN ST T OR AC'/ ,7 ILLY T , I CN E Z' PARK CANDL�,-T 041C URN ARR *T E SIL CR EK tv OCK I. —Tlc iIsLrrp, WIND ST X i c < 6 J 1D ATV n =T I lo z =IIEIMIEIA < " 'E TERRA AR•M 1 AM �V; 6Ar pR K' ID \ c ST. Li pia a J = CDN OCR R. oO .. P� U 7 C 7 N tl C 1,1 NARME' TE OR, 1 VIRGINIA CCLONY 0 �e 71lu U FREEWAY I TRXL3'E C' z S-WESPE -$ MCCRPARK COMMUNITY COLLECE aa� z PARK OR 2 vvALE �V F'N ST :ENa AVEI�`r �'�ERAOAN ST. Asphalt Overlay Project List of Streets Street Limits Adlena Place Avedon Road Beragan Street Butter Creek Road Campus Park Drive Clearcreek Court Coralberry Court Cottontail Road Daisy Court E. Cloverdale Street E. Mesa Verde Drive E. Quail Summit Road E. Vistapark Drive Fern Valley Court Havencrest Street Heatherglen Court Hollyglen Court Hunters Grove Court Laurelhurst Road Maplecrest Street McBeth Court Meadow Court Meadow Street Mistygrove Street N. Amberwick Lane N. Brookdale Lane N. Butterfield Lane N. Cloverdale Street N. Deepwell Lane N. Duke Street N. Fairbrook Lane N. Fireside Lane N. Isle Royale Street N. Kimberwick Lane N. Rand Street N. Robinwood Court N. Vistapark Drive N. Woodglen Drive Pepper Mill Street Poppyglen Court Rolling Knoll Drive Talmadge Road Vista Del Valle Drive Vista Levana Drive Wildflower Court Willowood Court All All South of Campus Park Drive L.A. Ave. to Avedon Road East of Collins Drive All East of Butter Creek Road Avedon Rd. to Talmade Rd. All All Peach Hill to End All All North of Chesterfield Drive West of Silvercrest Street All East of Butter Creek Road South of Mistygrove Street Mill Valley Road to N. Woodglen Drive East of Silvercrest Street North of Chesterfield Drive All All East of Walnut Creek Road South of Laurelhurst Road South of Laurelhurst Road South of Laurelhurst Road All North of E. Quail Summit Road South of E. Stanford Street North of E. Quail Summit Road North of E. Quail Summit Road All North of E. Quail Summit Road South of E. Stanford Street South of Laurelhurst Road All All All East of Butter Creek Road Chesterfield Drive to Laurelhurst Road North of Courtney Lane North of Peach Hill Road Bella Vista Drive to Vista Del Valle Drive East of Butter Creek Road East of Butter Creek Road 1 '0 � LEGEND Slurry Seal AC Overlay. --I-- CITY OF MOORPARK nr as 4- N Exhibit 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FY 02/03 BUDGET TO REVISE THE AMOUNTS OF THE APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET FOR PROJECT 8011: ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT [TDA, ARTICLE 8 (LTF) FUND (FUND 2603) AND CONGESTION RELIEF FUND (FUND 2610)] WHEREAS, on June 5, 2002, the City Council adopted the Budget for Fiscal Year 2002/03; and WHEREAS, a staff report has been presented to the City Council requesting a budget increase in the aggregate amount of $1,268,843; and WHEREAS, said staff report discusses certain fund transfers approved last fiscal year and the need to adjust same; and WHEREAS, Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, describes said budget amendment and its resultant impacts to the budget line item(s). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That a Budget amendment in the aggregate increase of $1,268,843, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit 'A': Appropriation and Budget Detail ''�.' (All Resolution No. 2003 - Exhibit "A" Revised Appropriations & Budget For Project 8011: Asphalt Overlay Project A. Fund Allocation .................... .... ............................................................................................. . ......... ....................................................................... Fund • ............. ................................................ . .......... ... .............................................................................. ......................... . .............................................. Account Number Amount, .... ... Local Transportation ............................... ............. ........................ 2603.8310.8011.5500 �.._: $1,285,600 TDA Article 8 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... . ...................................... Congestion Relief Fund . .......... . ........... .. ......... ............ .......................... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . . ....................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2610.8310.8011.5500 ............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (16,757); ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ..................................._..........................................................................................................................._........................................................................................................................................................................................_....._............................ . . . . . . . Total: $1,268,843: ..............................: B. FY 02/03 Budget Re -Cap .............. .... ........ ... .................. . .... _..........._............................................................................................................................................ ............................................................ _ ............ ......................................................................... Current: __ ............................. ............................................... Subject; ........... Revised; FY 02/03: Appropriation: FY 02/03: Account Number Bud et' � / (Reduction) Budget': ...... ............................... 2603. 8310. 8011. xxxx _......;..... _...... �. ... _.............. $ 502, 003 $ 1, 285, 6.00: $1,787,603: ...................................................................................._........................................................................_.......................................................;.........._.._..._._.._..................................................,................................ 2610.8310.8011.xxxx $ 16,757 .................._.._......... $ (16,757) ......................................................... ..............................; $ 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ................................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... .............................. ......................... ...... ... ............................................. ...... .._..._....__........_........._.................................... ..........................................................................._....__._................................_....._._..............._..._..........._..............._........................................._..........._............_............................_;.......................................................................__................................................................_.......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . $ 518,760; ............ ;....................... __._.._. ........................................ ,..................................................................................................... $ 1,268,843: _._. .... ,........................................... $1,787,603; __ ......................................... , ....................._......... C. Total Appropriations Re -Cap ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................... ........... ................................................. Revised: FY 02/03 Prior Years: Total: :Account Number • Budget; Expenditures, Appropriations: ..... ............................... 2603.8310.8011.xxxx $1,787,603; . ............ $ 28,698: $ 1,816,301: .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .: . . . . . . 2610................................................. 10.8011.xxxx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ...................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................... $ 0 .......... ...................... . . . . ................................. . . . . . . ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . ............... ....................... _ .................... :.. ........ . $1, 787, 603 ........................................................... .................. .............................................. $ 28,698 ....................... ...... ................ ......... ........... ......... .............. $ 1,816,301 ....._.... ... .............. ........... .... ...................... _. D. Distribution of Appropriations to Expense Accounts Approved as to form: _a� ITEE IN I - A 0 02/25/03 INFORMATION CHECK AMT CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TOTAL PUBLIC INFORMATION NET PAYABLE PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 U.S. POSTMASTER N 02/25/03 1101 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY M022503 RECREATION SECTION 20 MPK IN SPRNG 02/25/03 111973 0.00 0.00 1044.90 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 100011000000 9223 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE N 02/25/03 1101 0.00 02/25/03 220.00 M022503 7TH ANNUAL AWARDS LU 20 10 TICKETS 02/25/03 111974 0.00 0.00 220.00 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL CHECK AMT 220.00 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL NET PAYABLE 220.00 100021200000 9231 U.S. POSTMASTER N 02/25/03 1101 0.00 02/25/03 348.30 M022503 NEWSLETTER SECTION 20 MPK IN SPRNG 02/25/03 111973 0.00 0.00 348.30 TOTAL PUBLIC INFORMATION CHECK AMT 348.30 TOTAL PUBLIC INFORMATION NET PAYABLE 348.30 100076300000 9231 U.S. POSTMASTER N 02/25/03 1101 0.00 02/25/03 1044.90 M022503 RECREATION SECTION 20 MPK IN SPRNG 02/25/03 111973 0.00 0.00 1044.90 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM CHECK AMT 1044.90 TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAM NET PAYABLE 1044.90 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CHECK AMT 1613.20 TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET PAYABLE 1613.20 C, OF7 � RUN DATE 02/25/03 TIME 15:48:49 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING f 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY FUND - 2300 - AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 230089008901 9414 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA N 02/19/03 1101 0.00 02/06/03 22244.89 M021903 1 /1- 2 /1CITYWIDE VARI 20 2011977659 02/19/03 111972 0.00 0.00 22244.89 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT 22244.89 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE 22244.89 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE CHECK AMT 22244.89 TOTAL AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE NET PAYABLE 22244.89 TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT 23858.09 TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE 23858.09 jz! RUN DATE 02/25/03 TIME 15:48:49 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING 02/25/03 DISC DATE CHECK AMT CITY OF MOORPARK, CA NET PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 11/20/02 - 386.40 MANUAL CHECK ACTIVITY 0.00 FUND - 2901 - MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 11/20/02 - 2225.00 0.00 0.00 BUDGET UNIT ACCOUNT VENDOR 1099 PURCHASE ORDE TRANSACT PROGRAM CASH ACCT CONTROL DESCRIPTION T/C INVOICE CHK DATE ACCOUNT CHECK NO 290124202001 9102 PACIFIC RELOCATION C N - 2962.40 02/21/03 1101 AP121802 PRC ADMIN FEE 15% 20 M0211040 12/18/02 111424 V 290124202001 9252 PACIFIC RELOCATION C N - 2962.40 02/21/03 1101 AP121802 10 /02TREE REMOVAL 20 M0211040 12/18/02 111424 V 290124202001 9252 PACIFIC RELOCATION C N 02/21/03 1101 AP121802 11 /02VALLEY COMP SRV 20 M0211040 12/18/02 111424 V 290124202001 9252 PACIFIC RELOCATION C N 02/21/03 1101 AP121802 10 /02AMIGOS JANITORI 20 M0211040 12/18/02 111424 V TOTAL VENDOR CHECK AMT TOTAL VENDOR NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC CHECK AMT ' TOTAL MRPK MOBILE HM PARK RELOC NET PAYABLE TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC CHECK AMT TOTAL MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC NET PAYABLE TOTAL REPORT CHECK AMT TOTAL REPORT NET PAYABLE t RUN DATE 02/25/03 TIME 15:52:57 PAGE 1 SALES TAX DISC DATE CHECK AMT USE TAX DISC AMT NET PAYABLE 0.00 11/20/02 - 386.40 0.00 0.00 - 386.40 0.00 11/20/02 - 2225.00 0.00 0.00 - 2225.00 0.00 11/20/02 -76.00 0.00 0.00 -76.00 0.00 11/20/02 - 275.00 0.00 0.00 - 275.00 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 - 2962.40 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 10:39:08 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 111975 1101 02/28/03 2335 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN 2299 111976 1101 02/28/03 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 111976 1101 02/28/03 1886 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2210 TOTAL CHECK 111977 1101 02/28/03 1888 S E I U LOCAL 998 2208 111978 1101 02/28/03 1891 SANDRA KUENY 2299 111979 1101 02/28/03 1889 UNITED WAY OF VENTURA COU 2207 111980 1101 02/28/03 1890 VENTURA COUNTY DISTRICT A 2299 111981 1101 02/28/03 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 111981 1101 02/28/03 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL CHECK 111982 1101 02/28/03 1887 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F 2210 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 44� C 00 ------- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- CANCER INSURANCE F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP UNION DUES CASE #SD020444 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION ID #9600616061 F/T REG DEFER COMP F/T REG DEFER COMP P/T REG DEFER COMP PAGE NUMBER: 1 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 AMOUNT 114.32 3,361.21 1,150.15 4,511.36 397.71 1,693.00 179.00 168.46 1,597.33 3,445.20 5,042.53 269.12 12,375.50 12,375.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 10:39:11 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND FUND TITLE 1000 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REPORT f_ f f- AMOUNT 12,375.50 12,375.50 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 02/25/03 PAGE NUMBER: 1 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15 :29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 111983 1101 02/26/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 1/31 720.00 111984 1101 02/26/03 1011 ACCURATE INDUSTRIAL SUPPL 9252 TRASH CAN ANCHOR BOLT 33.89 111985 1101 02/26/03 2386 AGRX 9320 10 GAL ROUNDUP PRO 519.91 111986 1101 02/26/03 3454 AIRPORT PLAZA HOTEL 9222 3/2 -3/6 NACA LODGING 330.40 111987 1101 02/26/03 3047 ALAN BORNSTEIN CONSTRUCTI 9102 AVRC ROOF REPAIRS 550.00 111988 1101 02/26/03 1025 ALL -AIRE / AIR EXPRESS 9252 SR CTR A/C SERVICE 495.00 111988 1101 02/26/03 1025 ALL -AIRE / AIR EXPRESS 9252 AVRC GYM HEATER REPAI 351.00 111988 1101 02/26/03 1025 ALL -AIRE / AIR EXPRESS 9103 REPLACE FILTER UNIT 72.75 TOTAL CHECK 918.75 111989 1101 02/26/03 3016 AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING 9221 03 MEhffiERSHIP DUES 135.00 111990 1101 02/26/03 3411 AMSTERDAM PRINTING 9205 FREIGHT -PENS VOLUNTRS 21.67 111990 1101 02/26/03 3411 AMSTERDAM PRINTING 9205 CHAMBERLAIN PENS FOR VOLU 420.40 TOTAL CHECK 442.07 111991 1101 02/26/03 3455 APA PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE 9220 APA PUBLICATIONS 148.90 111992 1101 02/26/03 3449 APWA VENTURA COUNTY CHAPT 9222 3 /20GEN CONST PERMIT 95.00 111993 1101 02/26/03 2490 BJORKLAND, PAMELA G. 9160 BELLYDANCE INSTRUCTIO 84.00 111994 1101 02/26/03 1075 BRAND, JOHN 9224 CIWMB MTG MILEAGE 24.54 111994 1101 02/26/03 1075 BRAND, JOHN 9225 CIWMB PER DIEM,HOTEL 65.48 TOTAL CHECK 90.02 111995 1101 02/26/03 2414 BRANDCO BILLING 9254 TRUCK #28 OIL CHANGE 45.16 111996 1101 02/26/03 1983 BYAM, JAY H 9160 DANCE INSTRUCTOR 243.00 111997 1101 02/26/03 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 11/02 -92 CITATIONS 244.85 111997 1101 02/26/03 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 12/02 -116 CITATIONS 119.00 111997 1101 02/26/03 1130 CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS 9102 10/02 -180 CITATIONS 288.30 TOTAL CHECK 652.15 111998 1101 02/26/03 1136 COACH USA 9171 TEEN SKI TRIP 1/27/03 756.44 111999 1101 02/26/03 3178 COMPLETE PROPERTY MAINTEN 9102 02/03 FOUNTAIN MAINT 200.00 112000 1101 02/26/03 3000 COMPUTER POWER USER 9220 CPU SUBSCRIPTION DUES 48.00 112001 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9208 MRA COMPAQ ADAPTER 110.27 112001 -_- 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 WIRELESS PC CARD 123.34 112001 (° 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9205 CALENDAR CREATOR PLUS 70.79 112001 ('; 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 MEMORY CARD & PC CARD 98.67 112001 112001 1101 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 LOGITECH SPEAKERS,HEA 19.31 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 PRESARIO BATTERY PACK 95.45 112001 F:d 1101 02/26/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9201 SPEAKER SET 13.94 o TOTAL CHECK 531.77 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03MRA VISION 13.40 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 02/25/03 PAGE NUMBER: 2 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03SLD WST VISION 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03MRA /ECO VISION ,80 35.70 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03SLD WST VISION 8.40 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03CDBG CEO VISION .80 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PUB TRANS VISION 3.60 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03AD842 VISION .84 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PRK MAINT VISION 48.50 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03AD842 VISION 1.19 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03CDBG VISION 1.60 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03AD842 VISION 7.25 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PLANNING VISION 78.95 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03ADS42 VISION 07 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03VECTOR VISION 41.40 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03CEO VISION 23.46 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03COMM SRV VISION 7.20 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03C MGR VISION 52.60 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03FINANCE VISION 57.81 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 3751 3 /03COBRA VISION 23.90 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03ADMIN VISION 20.70 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03COMM DEV VISION 38.60 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03ADMIN VISION 38.70 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03HR VISION 8.00 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03COMM PAC VISION 31.05 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03RECREATION VISION 42.70 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03TEEN COORD VISION 8.00 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PW VISION 10.06 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03NPDES VISION .56 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03SR CTR VISION 15.90 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03C CLERK VISION 65.30 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PRKNG ENF VISION 15.24 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03ST MAINT VISION 63.60 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03AD842 VISION .07 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3 /03PRK MAINT VISION 20.70 112002 1101 02/26/03 1165 CPIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPA 9010 3/03X -GUARD VISION 9.75 TOTAL CHECK 796.40 112003 1101 02/26/03 1582 CREATIVE SOUNDS 9244 AFTER DARK DEEJAY SRV 395.00 112004 1101 02/26/03 1167 D & D SHIRTS UNLIMITED 9244 WOMENS V -BALL SHIRTS 261.52 112005 1101 02/26/03 1168 D F M ASSOCIATES 9220 CA ELECTIONS CODE 41.75 112006 1101 02/26/03 3448 DALLIN J HUTCHINSON 9208 REIMBURSE CAMERA CARD 65.90 112007 1101 02/26/03 1181 DICECCO, MARK 9001 1/27 MTG COMPENSATION 100.00 112008 1101 02/26/03 2320 DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATION 9102 3 /03MONTHLY SRVC 284.00 112009 1101 02/26/03 2987 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE COM 9205 03 ID CHECKING GUIDE 40.21 C, 112010 1101 02/26/03 1196 DUNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION 9301 GRAFFITI REMOVAL PAIN 81.09 112011 1101 02/26/03 1204 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 9103 STRATEGIC PLANNING 100.00 `( 112012 F1' 1101 02/26/03 1212 ENGRAVING WIZARD 9232 MPK PD ENGRAVING 9.65 Zb'S 8T' 69'fi 9£' £9'T V8 OT L5 'S ZZ' T9'E 8S'6 ZO' 5Z 'T ZO' T9'£ 05'ZZ Ti'S ET'8 ZZ'L 09'E SZ'9T S8'Z SUE bT' LO'8T S9'Z T9'E T9'E EO'6 T9'£ 5b'VT ET '6T IZ' 00'OL LZ'TZT 08'ET 00'S6 TL' b89 00'SBZ OS'Z5T OS'Z5T 00'08Z OZ'6Z SZ'ST WET 00'SZ 00'OT- 00'SE INnOWV ZO /8 :aOINHd ONIJMOOOri TZXHONHA E ussk N HEliid dva 0JH /VgqEO /£ dva OSQO 030£0/£ dV3 ONISnOH V-dWEO /£ dva ISM QIIOS£0 /£ dVa SNV?IL Hnd£0 /E dVa NOIIKaUDHHEO /E dria 0va WWOOEO /E dva Z48O'dEO /E dVH INIVW XIMEO /£ dVa LMIVW X-dd£0 /£ dva Z58CIVEO /£ dri3 ZbBQFiEO /E d'd3 Z680r3E0 /E dVS UI0 HSEO /E dVH JNINNK'IdEO /£ viva 090£0 /£ dVa Aaa WWOJ£0 /£ dva uoioaA£0 /£ dVa dNH ON)IMEO /£ drill HONKNIACO /E dKa (29'80 X£0 /E dKH JANS WOOEO /E dVa SaadNEO /E drill UDW 0£0 /£ dva MdEO /E dva crdooD N33.LE0 /£ dVH 2IHEO /E d'da NIWUKEO /£ drill SIEVE dK3 XHH'IO JEO /£ dKH J.NIVW .LSEO /£ dVa ZT 80VEO /E SEW Hn'IO asunE IIMI ddnS Oxilviado ad XdW VagIW 0N26L HXVfIOH.LUVH OILOadsNI IXa ova WOO dolDnUISNI sivuvx SISHL 2ia'IXNIUdS S IId SISHI 2I3'I)INIdIdS HdId ONINIVEI dsaimrioA ds H'IO KdoaiNn AH'IRI Oa0 H'IO WUOaINn AH'IRI 030 Had NIWQ'd ONVG 'I00HOSaUd- GNndaU ------- N0ILdI'dDSaa------- O106 HHI 'dnOUD NKW'IOH OT06 3HI 'dn0Hf) NKWPIOH OT06 aHI ' dnOHO NHW'IOH OT06 aHI 'dflOdE) NKW'IOH OT06 HH.L 'dnOUD MVW'IOH OT06 HH.L 'dnO-dD NVW'IOH OT06 3HI 'dnOUE) NVWIOH OT06 HH.L 'dnOUD NWnOH OT06 3HI 'dn02I0 XVknOH OT06 aHI 'dn02I0 NKW'IOH OT06 aHI 'dn02IJ NKW'IOH OT06 SHI 'dn02i0 NVW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dnO-dD XVKIOH OT06 3HL 'dnO2i`J NVknOH OT06 aH.L 'dn02lo Wl&nOH OT06 3HI ' dflOHD NHW'IOH OT06 aHL ' dn02i0 NVW'IOH OT06 3H.L 'dn0?I0 NdW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dn0UE) MVW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dn0UD MVW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dn0ii0 MVW'IOH OT06 aHL 'dn02i0 NVW'IOH OT06 aH.L ' d OUD NVW'IOH OT06 aHI 'dnOUD NHW'IOH OT06 3HI 'di102i0 MVW'IOH OT06 aHI 'MOOD MVW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dn0UE) NVW'IOH OT06 HHI 'dn0-do NFiW'IOH 0106 aHL 'dn0dE) MVW'IOH OT06 aHL 'dn0HE) NVW'IOH OT06 aHI ' dn0dE) NVW'IOH 0T06 3HI 'daOHD NVMOH TZZ6 'X AHEVS 'NVOOH SOZ6 'ONI 'SHI-dOlVdO8ri'I HInO Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT p,1 ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ® #[ ZZOZTT ZBZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT' Z'l ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT-,—J ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT '� ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT ZBZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT ZBZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT Z8ZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ZZOZTT 90EE EO /9Z /ZO TOTT TZOZTT ZSbE £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT OZOZTT bZZ6 HIaNNHX 'lHa8:'IIO i6ZT £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT 6TOZTT £OT6 aHSIfIONI.LXH adId S,'dHISOd OUT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT BTOZTT 09T6 EoDvi, '3WrPId LZZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT LTOZTT XDaHO 'IV10,L EOT6 'OD MIMES adId 9E6T EO /9Z /ZO TOTT 9TOZTT EOT6 '00 a0IAUHS HdId 9E6T EO /9Z /ZO TOTT 9TOZTT ZZZ6 aI'InP A8 sciooa 3NId TLBZ EO /9Z /ZO TOTT STOZTT XDSHJ 'IKIOL OZ06 SUEN'd3'IO anNaA'd HLdId ZZZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT TTOZTT OZ06 SdHNVH'IO HlINaA'd HISId ZZZT EO /9Z /ZO TOTT VTOZTT XOaHO gVLOI Z98E NVSIlS 'KZONIdSH 9b5E £0 /9Z /ZO TOTT ETOZTT Z98E NKSOS 'KZONIdSH 96fiE EO /9Z /ZO TOTT ETOZTT LDov -------------- 2i0QNaA-------------- QanSSI Him JDDV HSVD 'dHHWM XJaHJ QNnd TTdHNHO - OOOT - QNnd HHISI0HH X03H0 5'0 :6Z:ST :HWIL VD 'Xuvdd0ow d0 AIIO EO /SZ /ZO :HLva JNIINIIOOOri QNnd - N0ILKWJIN3d PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 4 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112022 1101 02/26/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 3 /03SOLID WST EAP 3.79 112022 1101 02/26/03 1282 HOLMAN GROUP, THE 9010 3 /03CDBG EAP .72 TOTAL CHECK 195.00 112023 1101 02/26/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 VECTOR OPERATING SUPP 96.31 112023 1101 02/26/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9208 TR PRK RESTROOM 98.03 112023 1101 02/26/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9254 TRUCK #16 TOOL BOX 211.28 112023 1101 02/26/03 1283 HOME DEPOT -GECF 9252 TR PRK RESTROOM 36.57 TOTAL CHECK 442.19 112024 1101 02/26/03 3381 HUFFMAN, COURTNEY 9244 JBL OFFICIAL 20.00 112025 1101 02/26/03 3443 HULL, PATRICIA 3301 REFUND -CIT #170288 50.00 112026 1101 02/26/03 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9211 3 /03FAX MACHINE RNTL 64.35 112026 1101 02/26/03 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9202 FAX MACHINE TONER 224.14 112026 1101 02/26/03 1447 IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, 9202 FAX MACHINE TONER CAR 424.53 TOTAL CHECK 713.02 112027 1101 02/26/03 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 TRUCK #16 REPLACE BEL 103.72 112027 1101 02/26/03 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 #16 PULLEY,POWER STEE 284.24 112027 1101 02/26/03 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9251 TRACTOR #17 REPAIRS 233.00 112027 1101 02/26/03 2993 INDUSTRIAL SERVICE CENTER 9254 #16 SHOCKS & SUSPENSI 219.15 TOTAL CHECK 840.11 112028 1101 02/26/03 1305 J E CLARK II CORPORATION 9255 TRACTOR FUEL 13.37 112029 1101 02/26/03 1312 JOLLY JUMPS INC 9244 3 /7BUNGEE RUN &WALL 675.00 112030 1101 02/26/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 3806 VINTAGE CREST ADMIN R -40.20 112030 1101 02/26/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2734 VINTAGE CREST ADMIN 40.20 112030 1101 02/26/03 2370 KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN I 2754 1 /03VINTAGE CREST 268.00 TOTAL CHECK 268.00 112031 1101 02/26/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 2 /03SR CTR RECREATION 589.00 112032 1101 02/26/03 1316 KELLY PAPER 9205 FLYERS,POSTCARDS,POST 121.16 112033 1101 02/26/03 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 YALE S/W REPAIR 78.83 112033 1101 02/26/03 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 MESA VERDE S/W REPAIR 78.83 112033 1101 02/26/03 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 PEACH HILL S/W REPAIR 65.69 112033 1101 02/26/03 2878 KWIK KART READY MIX, INC. 9310 BUTTERCREEK S/W REPAI 74.00 TOTAL CHECK 297.35 112034 1101 02/26/03 1329 LANDIS, KIPP A 9001 1/27 MTG COMPENSATION 100.00 112035 1101 02/26/03 3440 LAULETTA, DAVID 9001 1/27 MTG COMPENSATION 100.00 112036 1101 02/26/03 1645 LONG BEACH UNIFORM COMPAN 9205 MPK PD BOOTS SHIPPING 7.95 112037 ���.-1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 2 /03PW BLDG WATER 17.21 112037 C 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 2 /03COM FAC WATER 190.34 112037 L A, 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 2 /03ANNEX WATER 38.27 112037 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 1 /03ANNEX WATER 31.01 112037 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 2 /03AVRC WATER 24.37 112037 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 1 /03AVRC WATER 31.21 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 25.00 12/02C COUNCIL PHONE DATE: 02/25/03 1 /03MPK PD CAR WASH 184.00 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 15:29:04 24.00 1 /03XGUARDS CAR WASH 3.50 CHECK REGISTER 17.50 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND 1 /03PW STREEST CAR WA 32.50 1 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 112037 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 112037 1101 02/26/03 1361 MATILIJA WATER COMPANY, I 9205 TOTAL CHECK 137.28 1 /31- 2 /27SKATERAMP RN 72.40 112038 1101 02/26/03 2397 MIKOS, ROSEANN PH.D. 9224 112038 1101 02/26/03 2397 MIKOS, ROSEANN PH.D. 9223 TOTAL CHECK 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 112039 1101 02/26/03 1376 MOORPARK AUTO SPA & LUBE 9254 TOTAL CHECK 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9254 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9254 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9255 112040 1101 02/26/03 2537 MOBIL /GECC 9254 TOTAL CHECK 112041 1101 02/26/03 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 112041 1101 02/26/03 1750 MOBILE MINI, INC. 9103 TOTAL CHECK 112042 1101 02/26/03 2484 MOORPARK 76 9254 112043 1101 02/26/03 1382 MOORPARK BUSINESS SERVICE 9103 112044 1101 02/26/03 2530 MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, IN 9222 112045 1101 02/26/03 1392 MVCAC -STATE MOSQUITO ASSO 9204 112046 1101 02/26/03 3447 NATIONAL STOCK SIGN CO., 9303 112047 1101 02/26/03 1417 NORTH OAKS AUTO PARTS 9254 112048 1101 02/26/03 1422 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 9252 112049 1101 02/26/03 1426 OUTBACK FOOTWEAR 9020 112050 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050_ 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 < 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 "" 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 A 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 112050 P' 1101 02/26/03 1784 PACIFIC BELL /WORLDCOM 9420 Lrr�" TOTAL CHECK PAGE NUMBER: 5 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 1 /03PW BLDG WATER 17.21 1 /03COM FAC WATER 169.28 518.90 LEAGUE OF CA MILEAGE 86.88 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 25.00 12/02C COUNCIL PHONE 111.88 1 /03MPK PD CAR WASH 184.00 1 /03CEO CAR WASH 7.00 1 /03PARKS CAR WASH 24.00 1 /03XGUARDS CAR WASH 3.50 1 /03PW ADMIN CAR WASH 17.50 1 /03VECTOR CAR WASH 8.00 1 /03PW STREEST CAR WA 32.50 1 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS 3.50 280.00 1 /03PRKNG ENF CAR WAS 7.84 1 /03PW ST FUEL 13.07 1 /03MPK PD FUEL 78.04 1 /03X -GUARD CAR WASH 7.64 1 /03PW ADMIN FUEL 13.06 1 /03PRKS OIL & WASH 204.13 323.98 2 /5- 3 /4STORAGE UNIT 137.28 1 /31- 2 /27SKATERAMP RN 72.40 209.68 #18 OIL,FILTER & TIRE 56.50 3 /03SR NEWSLETTER TYP 160.87 INT GOVERNMENTAL ACCT 250.00 02 EXCESS BLOOD SAMPL 65.00 TEMP NO PARKING SIGNS 148.50 PARKS VEHICLE MAINT 10.27 STORAGE SHED 314.97 HENDERSON SAFETY BOOT 159.80 12 /02ST MAINT PHONE 47.28 12 /02CH PHONE 687.67 12/02C COUNCIL PHONE 4.60 12/02C CMGR PHONE 23.44 12 /02FINANCE PHONE 15.17 12 /02COMM SRV PHONE 46.47 12 /02SR CTR PHONE 15.43 12 /02REC PHONE 72.46 912.52 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112051 1101 02/26/03 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9350 2 /03STATE RTE SWEEPIN 561.33 112052 1101 02/26/03 2073 PEACOCK, STEVE P 9102 2 /03CITATION HEARING 15.00 112053 1101 02/26/03 3439 PESKAY, ROBERT 9001 1/27 MTG COMPENSATION 100.00 112054 1101 02/26/03 3451 PIZZARELLI, JOSEPH 9285 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 500.00 112055 1101 02/26/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9231 MPK PD TO LED SHIPMEN 11.93 112055 1101 02/26/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 2 /5CC MTG AGENDA PACK 323.25 112055 1101 02/26/03 1451 POSTNET AND COMMUNICATION 9232 B/W LETTERHEAD 374.30 TOTAL CHECK 709.48 112056 1101 02/26/03 3441 POZZA, SCOTT 9001 1/27 MTG COMPENSATION 100.00 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 19.07 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 19.07 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 24.10 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.30 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 19.07 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.30 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PRKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 VECTOR UNIFORM MAINT 19.07 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.20 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 COM CTR MAINT SUPPLIE 64.20 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 36.95 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 36.95 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9204 AVCP MAINT SUPPLIES 20.48 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.30 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PW UNIFORM MAINT 19.30 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 COM CTR UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 112057 1101 02/26/03 1464 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9020 PARKS UNIFORM MAINT 19.31 TOTAL CHECK 595.80 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 534.34 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03SLD WST MEDICAL 54.91 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PUB TRANS MEDICAL 204.91 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03TEEN COOR MEDICAL 267.78 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PW MEDICAL 546.30 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03NPDES MEDICAL 23.73 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03X -GUARD MEDICAL 350.49 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PRKNG ENF MEDICAL 652.44 112058 �_> 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03COM DEV MEDICAL 1,865.89 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03REC MEDICAL 1,764.81 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03CEO MEDICAL 791.39 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03MRA /ECO MEDICAL 845.70 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PLANNING MEDICAL 2,621.30 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03AD842 MEDICAL 247.44 112058 r p} 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03AD842 MEDICAL 3.48 i PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03AD842 MEDICAL 3.48 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03AD842 MEDICAL 41.77 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PRK MAINT MEDICAL 1,761.39 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03PRK MAINT MEDICAL 696.25 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03ST MAINT MEDICAL 3,121.05 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03AD842 MEDICAL 82.37 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03CDBG MEDICAL 53.56 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03CDBG CEO MEDICAL 26.78 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03MRA MEDICAL 510.82 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03HR MEDICAL 964.03 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03C MGR MEDICAL 3,639.53 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 2209 3 /03EMPLOYEES SHARE 156.00 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3/03C CLERK MEDICAL 2,244.60 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03COMM FAC MEDICAL 1,130.96 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03COMM SRVC MEDICAL 367.60 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03FINANCE MEDICAL 3,374.74 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03ADMIN MEDICAL 675.30 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03VECTOR MEDICAL 1,543.08 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03ADMIN MEDICAL 2,078.66 112058 1101 02/26/03 1466 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMEN 9010 3 /03SR CTR MEDICAL 593.18 TOTAL CHECK 33,840.06 112059 1101 02/26/03 1475 R.H.F., INC 9251 MPK PD RADAR RECERTIF 62.00 112059 1101 02/26/03 1475 R.H.F., INC 9251 MPK PD RADAR RECERTIF 50.00 TOTAL CHECK 112.00 112060 1101 02/26/03 1473 R.P. BARRICADE 9303 RD CLOSED & DETOUR 187.69 112060 1101 02/26/03 1473 R.P. BARRICADE 9303 RD CLOSED & DETOUR SI 254.18 TOTAL CHECK 441.87 112061 1101 02/26/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9244 AVRC CLASS SUPPLIES 18.77 112061 1101 02/26/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9222 RECREATION TEAM WORKS 63.27 112061 1101 02/26/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9222 SEMS TRAINING - PLANNIN 33.13 112061 1101 02/26/03 3022 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 9222 SEMS TRAINING - FINANCE 17.93 TOTAL CHECK 133.10 112062 1101 02/26/03 1994 ROTARY CLUB OF MOORPARK 9221 CAPT DIAZ FEES 68.00 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02LANDS /LIGHT FUEL 19.79 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02PARKS FUEL 51.45 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02VECTOR FUEL 45.35 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02PW STREETS FUEL 60.59 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02REC FUEL 7.92 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 6.26 112063 1101 02/26/03 1508 SHELL OIL COMPANY 9255 11 /02CEO FUEL 32.36 TOTAL CHECK 223.72 112064 1101 02/26/03 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 1/03 SIGNAL REPAIRS 401.57 112065 (i 1101 02/26/03 2140 SIMI RECREATIONAL VEHICLE 9285 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 500.00 112066 1101 02/26/03 1516 SIMI VALLEY ADULT SCHOOL 9236 KEYBOARDING TESTING 30.00 112067`? 1101 02/26/03 1064 SIMI VALLEY FORD 9254 #2 IGNITION REPLACED 168.92 112067 1101 02/26/03 1064 SIMI VALLEY FORD 9254 #30 EXTRA KEYS 52.55 112067 1101 02/26/03 1064 SIMI VALLEY FORD 9254 TRUCK #15 SERVICE 153.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 8 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 374.47 112068 1101 02/26/03 1520 SIMI VALLEY LOCK & KEY 9204 ALL PARKS LOCKS 191.12 112069 1101 02/26/03 3094 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 9223 4 /3MANAGING MULTIPLE 199.00 112070 1101 02/26/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9244 SR CTR HOSPITALITY 53.86 112070 1101 02/26/03 1527 SMART & FINAL 9205 SR CTR VOLUNTEER RECO 141.16 TOTAL CHECK 195.02 112071 1101 02/26/03 2141 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS 9220 SUBDIVISION MAP ACT 54.26 112072 1101 02/26/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9232 RECREATION COLOR CHAN 225.00 112072 1101 02/26/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9231 RECREATION MAIL SRVCS 270.00 112072 1101 02/26/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9240 NEWSLETTER COLOR CHAN 225.00 112072 1101 02/26/03 3434 SPEEDY PRESS SERVICES, IN 9231 NEWSLETTER MAIL SRVCS 270.00 TOTAL CHECK 990.00 112073 1101 02/26/03 3055 STRINGER, LAURA 9205 PRNTER /SCANNER /COPIER 239.56 112073 1101 02/26/03 3055 STRINGER, LAURA 9201 PS 2.0 CABLES 13.40 TOTAL CHECK 252.96 112074 1101 02/26/03 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102 12 /02DATALINE SRVCS 101.89 112074 1101 02/26/03 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9102 1 /03DATA LINE SRVCS 160.84 112074 1101 02/26/03 1438 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 9223 4/13 -15 CLIENT CONFER 595.00 TOTAL CHECK 857.73 112075 1101 02/26/03 1658 TARGET 9205 AVRC VCR 50.40 112076 1101 02/26/03 1566 TELCOM INC 9251 CEO RADIO ANTENNA 16.09 112077 1101 02/26/03 1568 TERRA FIRMA ENTERPRISES 9103 SEMS SECTIONAL TRAINI 360.00 112078 1101 02/26/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 1 /03PW BLDG GAS 43.09 112078 1101 02/26/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 1 /03MOBILEHOME GAS 170.12 112078 1101 02/26/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 1 /03COM FAC GAS 143.60 112078 1101 02/26/03 1571 THE GAS COMPANY 9416 1 /03AVRC GAS 108.27 TOTAL CHECK 465.08 112079 1101 02/26/03 2415 THE MARK -IT PLACE 9240 MPK PD DARE PLAQUES 642.61 112080 1101 02/26/03 1575 THOUSAND OAKS CAB COMPANY 9102 1 /03TAXI SRVC -40 TRIP 261.00 112081 1101 02/26/03 1577 THOUSAND OAKS YAMAHA KAWA 9254 MPK PD CYCLE POLISH 8.19 112082 1101 02/26/03 1948 TOTAL TENNIS ACADEMY 9160 TENNIS INSTRUCTOR 862.20 112083 1101 02/26/03 2827 TRAN, LOC H 9222 NACA MTG PER DIEM,PRK 338.26 112084_ 1101 02/26/03 1591 TROPHIES ETC 9240 20TH ANNIV KEY TAGS 593.02 112085 1101 02/26/03 1099 UNITED RENTALS 9303 14' SIGN POSTS 173.57 1-21 112086 1101 02/26/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9630 AVCP PHASE II 46.29 112086 1101 02/26/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 FLINN AVE REALIGNMENT 8.04 112086 1101 02/26/03 1599 UNIVERSAL REPROGRAPHICS, 9601 ARROYO SIMI TRAIL STU 14.39 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 9 DATE:.02 /25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:04 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 68.72 112087 1101 02/26/03 3204 VANDAVEER, DOROTHY J 9103 12/5 MTG MINUTES 135.00 112088 1101 02/26/03 3456 VASQUEZ, LUCY 3850 REFUND -TR PARK 40.00 112089 1101 02/26/03 1622 VIDEOTAPE PLUS INC 9205 SUPER VHS TAPES 375.75 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 TR PRK CONCRETE 14.97 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 AV PRK CONCRETE 14.97 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9252 RAT TRAPS - STORAGE ARE 16.06 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9310 PW CONCRETE 4.05 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9304 X -GUARD RAIN BOOTS 16.08 112090 1101 02/26/03 1636 WHITAKER HARDWARE, INC 9301 GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPP 21.39 TOTAL CHECK 87.52 112091 1101 02/26/03 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 KEEP RIGHT SIGNS 145.37 112091 1101 02/26/03 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 NO STOPPING ANYTIME 395.75 TOTAL CHECK 541.12 TOTAL FUND 64,774.03 TOTAL REPORT 64,774.03 6 r' UZI �yy ro' PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 02/25/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 15:29:11 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/02 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 3,262.29 1000 GENERAL FUND 36,899.06 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 1,241.13 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 46.29 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6,706.83 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 475.72 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 3.57 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 3.57 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 42.83 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4,349.45 2604 TEA 21 FEDERAL GRANTS 14.39 2605 GAS TAX 7,369.14 2701 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUND 83.64 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 1,809.30 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 994.86 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 471.14 5001 SOLID WASTE AB939 692.62 6515 USA PROPERTIES 308.20 TOTAL REPORT 64,774.03 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 02/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:00:12 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112092 1101 03/05/03 2690 ACCOUNTEMPS 9102 SZABO -WK END 2/7/03 810.00 112093 1101 03/05/03 2983 ALL VALLEY ESCROW 9285 RENTAL ASSISTANCE 11,412.66 112094 1101 03/05/03 2983 ALL VALLEY ESCROW 9285 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 11,000.00 112095 1101 03/05/03 1031 AMERICAN STORES C/O ALBER 2799 CPD90 -2 MM #1 LABOR,MA 51,930.00 112095 1101 03/05/03 1031 AMERICAN STORES C/O ALBER 2799 LUCKYS PERFORMANCE BO 100,106.25 112095 1101 03/05/03 1031 AMERICAN STORES C/O ALBER 2799 CPD90 -2 MM #1 PERFORMA 51,930.00 112095 1101 03/05/03 1031 AMERICAN STORES C/O ALBER 2799 LUCKYS PERFORMANCE BO 60,342.75 TOTAL CHECK 264,309.00 112096 1101 03/05/03 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 LA AVE WIDENING PROJR 11,700.00 112096 1101 03/05/03 2165 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORA 9601 LA AVE WIDENING PROJE 5,325.00 TOTAL CHECK 17,025.00 112097 1101 03/05/03 3362 CENTURY CONSTRUCTORS, INC 9620 CHARLES ST CONSTRUCTI 10,053.06 112098 1101 03/05/03 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9252 CLOSING FEES -SP #5 15,925.00 112099 1101 03/05/03 2873 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 9285 PURCHASE SP #6 16,925.00 112100 1101 03/05/03 3024 CHICAGO TITLE ESCROW 9610 LA AVE WIDENING E PRO 51,442.85 112101 1101 03/05/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 9503 PROFILE 4LS P4 /2GHZ 1,714.93 112101 1101 03/05/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 1311 256MB MEMUPG DDR SDRAM 94.00 112101 1101 03/05/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 1311 EVO N1020V P4/2.4 256/40G 1,385.18 112101 1101 03/05/03 1144 COMPUWAVE 1311 HP DESKJET 5550 PRINTER 130.64 TOTAL CHECK 3,324.75 112102 1101 03/05/03 1179 DIAL SECURITY 9102 1 /27- 31METROLINK GUAR 598.00 112102 1101 03/05/03 1179 DIAL SECURITY 9102 1 /20- 24METROLINK GUAR 598.00 TOTAL CHECK 1,196.00 112103 1101 03/05/03 3445 GILMORE, JAMES M. 9630 AV SPORTS FIELD DESIG 1,040.00 112104 1101 03/05/03 2823 HAMNER, JEWELL & ASSOCIAT 9610 LA AVE /BELTRAMO RD 1,787.60 112105 1101 03/05/03 1315 KELLY CLEANING & SUPPLIES 9102 2 /03AVRC JANITORIAL 960.00 112106 1101 03/05/03 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 TR RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 5,288.00 112106 1101 03/05/03 3015 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES, 9601 LA AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1,776.00 TOTAL CHECK 7,064.00 112107 1101 03/05/03 2251 MCNAMARA & ASSOCIATES 9103 N/E MPK AVE & CHARLES 3,100.00 112108 1101 03/05/03 3453 MEREDITH, HERBERT 9285 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EX 1,100.00 112109 1101 03/05/03 1768 NYE & NELSON INC 9632 HIGH ST PRKNG LOT 14,784.66 �- 112110 f 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03C MGR PHONE 8.04 112110 f" 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03CITYWIDE PHONE 924.18 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03C CLERK PHONE 8.04 112110 f"=� 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03MILLER PRK PAYPHO 58.76 112110 g+ 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03POINDEXTER PRK PA 58.76 112110 ® 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03COMM CTR PAYPHONE 53.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 02/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:00:12 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03GLENWOOD PRK PAYP 58.76 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03CMPS CYN PRK PAYP 58.76 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03FINANCE PHONE 8.04 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03EMRGNCY MGT PHONE 151.98 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9420 1 /03VECTOR PHONE 23.67 112110 1101 03/05/03 1428 PACIFIC BELL 9421 1 /03CAMPUS PRK PAYPHO 58.76 TOTAL CHECK 1,470.75 112111 1101 03/05/03 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9252 10 /02QUALITY LANDSCAP 2,225.00 112111 1101 03/05/03 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9102 PRC ADMIN FEE 15% 386.40 112111 1101 03/05/03 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9252 10 /02AMIGOS JANITORIA 275.00 112111 1101 03/05/03 2217 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSUL 9252 VALLEY COMPUTER SRVCS 76.00 TOTAL CHECK 2,962.40 112112 1101 03/05/03 1429 PACIFIC SWEEP 9351 2 /03CITY & TR SWEEPIN 6,742.09 112113 1101 03/05/03 1793 PEDERSEN FENCE & PATIO CO 9252 HIGH ST CHAIN LINK FE 1,168.00 112114 1101 03/05/03 3451 PIZZARELLI, JOSEPH 9285 RESIDENTIAL MOVING EX 1,100.00 112115 1101 03/05/03 3451 PIZZARELLI, JOSEPH 9285 RENTAL ASSISTANCE 9,996.00 112116 1101 03/05/03 2691 PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION CO. 9632 COMM CTR PRK PLAYGROU 9,285.00 112117 1101 03/05/03 1492 RRM DESIGN GROUP 9601 REIMBURSABLES (NOT TO EXC 373.51 112117 1101 03/05/03 1492 RRM DESIGN GROUP 9601 PHASE C: FINAL REPORT 2,791.62 112117 1101 03/05/03 1492 RRM DESIGN GROUP 9601 PHASE B: PRELIMINARY REPO 1,934.79 112117 1101 03/05/03 1492 RRM DESIGN GROUP 9601 ARROYO SIMI TRAIL STUDY 3,892.35 TOTAL CHECK 8,992.27 112118 1101 03/05/03 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 1 /03INTERSECTION MAIN 1,333.50 112118 1101 03/05/03 1513 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 9253 1 /03INSURANCE ADJUSTM 72.15 TOTAL CHECK 1,405.65 112119 1101 03/05/03 2140 SIMI RECREATIONAL VEHICLE 9285 REPLACEMENT HOUSING 12,000.00 112120 1101 03/05/03 1742 SIMI - CONEJO CONSTRUCTION 3110 REIMB ST IMPROVEMENTS 576,868.00 112121 1101 03/05/03 3387 SKAUG TRUCK 9505 INSTALL LIFT GATE 583.20 112121 1101 03/05/03 3387 SKAUG TRUCK 9505 TOMMY LIFT GATE -500LB 1,590.55 TOTAL CHECK 2,173.75 112122 1101 03/05/03 2082 SPECTRATURF INC. 9632 FREIGHT -COM PK RUBBER 94.50 112122 1101 03/05/03 2082 SPECTRATURF INC. 9632 INSTALL RUBBER -COM PK 3,307.34 112122 1101 03/05/03 2082 SPECTRATURF INC. 9632 POUR IN PLACE RUBBER 4,724.76 TOTAL CHECK 8,126.60 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03VIRGINIA COLONY 315.00 112123.,_,1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03CAMPUS PRK 803.00 112123 - -1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03CAMPUS CYN PRK 2,520.00 112123 =- -1101 "1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03CIVIC /COMM CTR 525.00 112123 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03GRIFFIN PRK 1,208.00 112123 k 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03PCH HILL PRK 2,520.00 112123 11101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03COLMER ALYSSAS CT 32.00 112123 ° 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03METROLINK STATION 299.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 2/03 661 MPK AVE 42.00 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 02/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:00:12 CHECK REGISTER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/02 FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- AMOUNT 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9252 2/03 18 HIGH ST 68.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03 798 MPK AVE 80.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03POINDEXTER PRK 735.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03COMM CTR PRK 194.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03AVCP & PED BRIDGE 5,612.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03GLENWWOD PRK 1,018.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03VILLA CAMPESINA 284.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03MILLER PRK 735.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03CW PRKWYS & MED 6,046.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z1 PECAN,BAMBI,BE 84.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z2 SPRING,CHR BAR 2,823.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z3 PEPRML,BTR CRK 137.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z4 WMS RCH PRKWYS 268.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03MONTE VISTA PRK 326.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z5 PCH HILL -TR 1,149.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03MTN MEADOWS PRK 2,468.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z6 GLENHAVEN 49.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03TR PRK 2,520.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z7 MPK SQ IND PK 420.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03CNTRY TRAIL PRK 1,680.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2/03Z8 HOME ACRES BUF 315.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03Z9MPK BUS CTR PLT 53.00 112123 1101 03/05/03 1555 SUNRIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTE 9331 2 /03MTN MEADOWS COMM 7,824.00 TOTAL CHECK 43,152.00 112124 1101 03/05/03 3217 TASCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9621 COMM CTR ROOF REPAIR 31,877.00 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02RECREATION FUEL 84.33 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02VECTOR FUEL 64.16 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02PW ADMIN FUEL 17.96 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02X- GUARDS FUEL 13.00 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02MPK PD FUEL 30.28 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02PRKNG ENF FUEL 19.50 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02PARKS FUEL 271.90 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12/02AD842 FUEL 27.46 112125 1101 03/05/03 1600 UNION 76 9255 12 /02PW STREETS FUEL 527.90 TOTAL CHECK 1,056.49 112126 1101 03/05/03 1602 URBAN FUTURES, INC 9102 12 /02MRA IMPLEMENTATI 1,575.00 112127 1101 03/05/03 3444 USA PROPERTIES FUND, INC. 2799 VINTAGECREST APT BOND 80,000.00 112128 1101 03/05/03 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 12 /02MRA REPORT & ADJ 725.00 112128 1101 03/05/03 1721 VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO 9102 12 /02REPORT & ADJ ENT 3,300.00 TOTAL CHECK 4,025.00 112129 1101 03/05/03 2283 VENCO WESTERN, INC. 9331 2/03 Z12 LANDSCAPE 3,778.50 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30MILLER PRK 1,323.72 112130.Y 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30CAMPUS PRK 743.70 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30PRKWYS & MED 1,404.12 112130 -. 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 1 71.29 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 2 762.46 112130 ` k 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 4 61.31 112130+ 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 5 476.78 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 12 /4- 1 /30MONTE VISTA 31.26 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING DATE: 02/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA TIME: 09:00:12 CHECK REGISTER FUND - 1000 - GENERAL FUND CHECK NUMBER CASH ACCT DATE ISSUED -------- - - - - -- VENDOR-------- - - - - -- ACCT 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 112130 1101 03/05/03 1620 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS 9415 TOTAL CHECK 112131 1101 03/05/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 112131 1101 03/05/03 1621 VIDEOMAX PRODUCTIONS 9102 TOTAL CHECK 112132 1101 03/05/03 1643 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 9303 TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT C `C r1 4� - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION- - - - - -- 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 6 12 /4- 1 /30CNTRY TRAIL 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 8 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 10 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 11 12/4- 1 /30AVRC & GYM 12 /4- 1 /30CMPS CYN PRK 12 /4- 1 /30GRIFFIN PRK 12 /4- 1 /30TIERRA REJAD 12 /4- 1 /30PCH HILL PRK 12/4- 1 /30MTN MEADOWS 12 /4- 1 /30ZONE 12 11 /02GRAPHIC /BBS FROG 11 /02VIDEO PRODUCTION NO PARKING /STOPPING PAGE NUMBER: 4 VENCHK21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/02 Wlulel li �wk 31.26 798.52 237.74 5,106.86 50.03 366.37 1,311.85 645.34 450.01 1,307.96 967.55 2,767.42 18,915.55 672.00 2,250.00 2,922.00 957.51 1,263,809.14 1,263,809.14 PENTAMATION - FUND ACCOUNTING PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 02/26/03 CITY OF MOORPARK, CA VENCHK21 TIME: 09:00:15 CHECK REGISTER - FUND TOTALS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 9/02 FUND FUND TITLE AMOUNT 0100 INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 924.18 1000 GENERAL FUND 44,707.07 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 32.50 2100 COMMUNITY WIDE 1,040.00 2111 ZONE DEVELOPMENT FEES 1 17,411.60 2200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,714.93 2300 AD 84 -2 CITYWIDE 7,477.58 2301 AD 84 -2 ZONE 1 155.29 2302 AD 84 -2 ZONE 2 3,585.46 2303 AD 84 -2 ZONE 3 137.00 2304 AD 84 -2 ZONE 4 329.31 2305 AD 84 -2 ZONE 5 1,625.78 2306 AD 84 -2 ZONE 6 80.26 2307 AD 84 -2 ZONE 7 420.00 2308 AD 84 -2 ZONE 8 552.74 2309 AD 84 -2 ZONE 9 53.00 2310 AD 84 -2 ZONE 10 12,930.86 2311 AD 84 -2 ZONE 11 82.•03 2312 AD 84 -2 ZONE 12 6,545.92 2400 PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 31,449.98 2501 LOS ANGELES A.O.C. 72,031.45 2502 TIERRA REJADA A.O.C. 582,156.00 2604 TEA 21 FEDERAL GRANTS 8,992.27 2605 GAS TAX 9,633.15 2901 MRA LOW /MOD INC HOUSE /INC 92,474.12 2902 MRA AREA 1 -INCR & OTHER 21,462.66 5000 LOCAL TRANSIT PROGRAMS 8C 1,495.00 6200 AMERICAN STORES 264,309.00 6515 USA PROPERTIES 80,000.00 TOTAL REPORT 1,263,809.14 6 � l Est r 3 - 5 _Dc. 0 )YlGludir�c GIS�C��"lE�v� c� �`�c =� MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council / i FROM: Cindy Borchard, Administrative Services Director DATE: February 18, 2003 (meeting of March 5, 2003) SUBJECT: CONSIDER MID -YEAR AMENDMENTS TO 2002/2003 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET BACKGROUND The City Council adopted a budget for fiscal year 2002/2003 on June 5, 2002 and periodically has amended it by resolution for various projects and programs. After a review of the current budget status, in anticipation of developing a budget recommendation for the new fiscal year, staff has compiled additional recommended budget amendments for the City Council's consideration. DISCUSSON The attached resolution makes several adjustments to the currently adopted 2002/2003 fiscal year budget, with an explanation for each item contained in exhibit "A ". These adjustments are all either corrections that do not represent additional costs, cost increases that the council has previously authorized, omissions, or critical items that were not previously included in the budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote Required) 1. Adopt Resolution 2003- amending the 2002/2003 budget as noted in exhibit "A" to the attached resolution. RESOLUTION 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, on June 5, 2002, the City Council adopted the operating budget for fiscal year 2002/2003; and WHEREAS, certain additions and adjustments to the budget are proposed to allow for effective service delivery for the balance of the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to amend the 2002/2003 fiscal year budget as noted in exhibit "A ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Exhibit "A" Mid Year Budget Amendment for the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Current Revised Budget Unit Account Division Description Budget Change Budget Explanation 1000 - 2100 -0000 9424 City Manager Cellular phones 0 1,100 1,100 3 cellular phones 1000 - 2100 -0000 9003 City Manager Part time salaries 0 31,000 31,000 Executive Secretary salary expense 1000 - 3110 -0000 9010 Human Resources Group insurance 3,927 4,173 8,100 Group insurance for Human Resources employees 1000 - 7210 -0000 9020 Animal Control Uniforms 0 1,800 1,800 Uniform cleaning service for Animal Control 1000 - 7620 -0000 9020 Comm. Facilities Uniforms 0 1,300 1,300 Uniform cleaning service for Community Facilities 1000 - 7620 -7701 9621 Comm. Facilities Building improvements 0 13,831 13,831 Correct account error in budget - no fiscal impact 1000 - 7620 -0000 9621 Comm. Facilities Building improvements 13,831 (13,831) 0 Correct account error in budget - no fiscal impact 1000 - 8100 -0000 9102 Public Works Contract services 0 3,100 3,100 Security alarm service and Kelly cleaning service 2151 - 2100 -2002 9632 City Manager Improvements 0 1,505 1,505 9/11 fountain plaque 2300 - 7900 -7901 9102 Landscaping AD Contract services 0 5,000 5,000 Correct account error in budget - no fiscal impact 2300 - 8900 -7901 9102 Street Lighting Contract services 5,000 (5,000) 0 Correct account error in budget - no fiscal impact 2400 - 7800 -0000 9020 Park Maintenance Uniforms 0 3,300 3,300 Uniform cleaning service for Arroyo Vista 2605- 8310 -0000 9020 Street Maintenance Uniforms 0 2,500 2,500 Uniform cleaning service for Maintenance 2701 - 2440 -0000 9820 CDBG Transfer out 0 248,765 248,765 6479 -B Penn St. acquisition repayment to Ventura County Total 298,543 �4 V1f1ORPARK. CA1,1FORNiA C it,N ( minril Nlf.di t! CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RE PORO` : CITY OF MOORPARK TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Director of Community Services in of March 5 2003 DATE: February 20, 2003 (CC Meeting ) SUBJECT: Initiate Proceedings Related to the Levy of Assessments for the Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for FY 2003/2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment A), which is required by law to initiate proceedings to continue the City's existing Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for FY 2003/2004. BACKGROUND In July 1999, the City successfully established an assessment district for the maintenance and improvement of City parks. The current Maintenance District is based on a "special" assessment. This means that the City assesses property owners for that portion of park maintenance and improvement activities that generate a "special" benefit. The City is responsible for funding activities that generate a "general" benefit. The Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District includes all existing 15 City parks. The amount of the assessment levied to property may be adjusted annually by a Cost of Living factor, not more than 3 percent. DISCUSSION To initiate the process to continue the Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District, the Council must adopt a \ \MOR PRI SERV \home_folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist \assessm dist resol 2003 ccagd.doc ,,qq Park Assessment Resolution Page 2 resolution. Once adopted, the City's engineering consultant can proceed with preparing the Engineer's Report. The goal of the proposed time line would be to hold a public hearing at the first meeting in June (consistent with the time line for AD 84 -2) to consider the levy of the park assessment. As part of the annual budget process, the City Council will consider whether to renew the park assessment and the levy amount. According to state law, before an assessment can be levied, an Engineer's Report must be prepared for assessment district. The preparation of an Engineer's Report does not require the City to approve the Engineer's Report and levy assessments. The purpose of the Engineer's Report is to develop the information necessary to make the decision. The report sets forth the items proposed to be funded by the districts and the methods used to distribute the cost for those items to all of the properties within the district. When completed, the Engineer's Report will be submitted to the City Council for approval. Approval of that report by the Council does not require the City to levy the assessment. Approval only allows the assessment set forth in the Engineer's Report to be considered at a subsequent public hearing. Previously, the City Council approved an agreement Shilts Consultants to perform as the City's Assessment Engineer for the Park Assessment District as well as the City's four Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts. Shilts will prepare the Engineer's Report and administer the park assessment for FY 2003/2004. STAFF RECOM4ENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 2003- (Attachment A), authorizing preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Moorpark Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for FY 2003/04. Attachments: (A) Resolution X29 RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2003, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 2004 WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, by its Resolution No. 99 -1625, this Council ordered the formation of and levied the first assessment within the City of Moorpark Parks and Recreation Maintenance and Improvement District (the "Assessment District ") pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the California Constitution, and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "Act ") , Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500 thereof), and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark proposes to continue the specified district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2003, and ending June 30, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION l: The purpose of the Assessment District is for the installation, maintenance and servicing of improvements to the City of Moorpark, as described in Section 2 below. SECTION 2. Within the Assessment District, the existing and proposed improvements to be undertaken by the Assessment District are generally described as the installation, maintenance and servicing of public facilities, including but not limited to, landscaping, sprinkler systems, park grounds, park facilities, landscape corridors, ground cover, shrubs and trees, street frontages, playground equipment and hardcourt areas, senior and community centers, drainage systems, lighting, fencing, entry monuments, basketball courts, tennis courts, running tracks, other recreational facilities, security guards, graffiti removal and repainting, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment, as applicable, for property owned and maintained by the City of Moorpark. Installation means the construction of recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage, lights, playground equipment, play courts, recreational facilities and public restrooms. Maintenance means \ \MOR PRI SERV \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist\ Reso 1 03 04.doc •2r� �a Resolution No. 2003 - Page 2 the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of said improvements, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping; and cleaning, sandblasting and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy for the operation or lighting of any improvements, and water for irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements. SECTION 3. Shilts Consultants, Inc. is hereby designated as Engineer of Work for purposes of these proceedings and is hereby ordered to prepare an Engineer's Report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act and Article XIIID of the California Constitution. Upon completion, the Engineer shall file the Engineer's Report with the City Clerk for submission to the Council. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2003. Patrick Hunter, Mayor ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk \ \MOR PRI SERV \home folders \MLindley \Assessment Dist\ Reso 1 03 04.doc 2 MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Hartnett, Recreation Manager( DATE: February 21, 2003 (CC Meeting of March 5, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Request from Moorpark Kiwanis to Waive Park Rental Fees for Softball Tournament SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to consider a request from the Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees for a Softball Tournament it plans to host on the weekend of November 8 and 9, 2003. The fee waiver request includes use of eight softball fields, the use of the City's softball bases and field preparation equipment at no cost, and permission to operate temporary concession stands at each location and utilize field lights. Approval of the request would be consistent with previous actions taken by the City Council for past softball tournaments sponsored by Kiwanis, for the purpose of raising money to benefit community programs. DISCUSSION Over the past seven or eight years, Moorpark Kiwanis has conducted a Softball Tournament, and for the past four years it has held the tournament in conjunction with the American Softball Association. The tournament serves girls between the ages of 8 to 18 with over 50 teams participating. For this year's tournament, Kiwanis is requesting use of the following City softball fields: Field Request • Arroyo Vista Community Park (4 fields) • Mountain Meadows Park (2 fields) • Peach Hill Park (1 field) • Miller Park (1 field) � 1 cl3 20 Honorable City Council March 5, 2003 Page 2 The tournament will begin Saturday and will run through Sunday. Consistent with previous years, staff recommends Kiwanis not have the use of AVCP on Saturday since AYSO will be holding games and be provided three fields at AVCP on Sunday, with the fourth field being an option, based on phase II completion. If an additional field is needed on Saturday or Sunday, staff recommends making Campus Canyon available to Kiwanis, as well. Additionally, and consistent with recent City policy, Kiwanis will be restricted from using Mountain Meadows Park no earlier than 9:00 a.m., and no later than 5:00 p.m., on Saturday and Sunday. Kiwanis would also be asked that in consideration of granting its request, if games are also scheduled at Mountain Meadows School, that they not begin before 9:00 a.m. The Softball Tournament serves as a major fundraising event for the Club. The Kiwanis support a variety of City and community projects throughout the year, including the City sponsored Easter Egg Hunt, 3rd of July Event, Halloween Festival, and senior citizen program, in addition to high school scholarships, Catch a Star Christmas program, Terrific Kids program, Catholic Charities food drive, Los Angeles Avenue clean -up, and Moorpark Police Department projects to name a few. As has been the case in the past, the Kiwanis Club plans to perform all field preparation using the City's equipment. It will also purchase or reimburse the City for all expendable items such as chalk, as well as field lights. Consistent with last year, it is recommended that Kiwanis reimburse the City for one staff person to monitor and respond to the needs of the tournament. This is consistent with the City Council's action in regards to the Moorpark Girls Softball and AYSO tournaments. In order to provide the additional levels of service needed to ensure that the trash cans are emptied, the restrooms cleaned and stocked, and that all service requests are handled in a responsive manner, one staff person needs to be dedicated to tournament rentals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the request from Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees associated with their Girls Softball Tournament, provided that they pay all direct costs incurred by the City, including one staff person dedicated to the Tournament. Moorpark City Council AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst DATE: February 26, 2003 (CC meeting of March 5, 2003) SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Procurement and Installation of Transit Bus Shelters. SUMMARY The City Council is being asked to approve plans and specifications for the procurement and installation of Transit Bus Shelters. The attached specifications represent the recommendation of the previous Transportation and Streets Committee (Councilmembers Mikos and Millhouse) . Following the Council's approval, bid proposals will be solicited for an initial order of eight (8) shelters with benches. Five of the benches will be paid for with a countywide 88.5% CMAQ grant coordinated by VCTC, with a match of city TDA funds and the remainder coming from the City's TDA funds appropriated in the Fiscal year 2002/03 budget for the bus stop amenities program. The bids will ask for a three -year price guarantee so that the City could order additional shelters at the same cost if it chooses to do so in the future. The goal is to complete the initial installation of the eight shelters by June 1, 2003. DISCUSSION Among the City Council Fiscal Year 2002/03 Goals and Objectives is one to enhance bus stops with amenities such as signs, route maps, benches and shelters. The previous City Council Transportation and Streets Committee considered the many options available for bus shelters. The Committee considered various construction materials, design styles and colors. The Committee also looked into commissioning custom architectural design of a shelter, but found that it was cost prohibitive. The challenge facing the Committee was to find a design that was attractive and would fit in all areas of town. The Committee hoped that a common design would help U134 Transit bus shelters CC Meeting of March 5, 2003 Page 2 establish a unifying look in the diverse areas of the City. The Committee also had to consider the space constraints that exist at bus stops. It is necessary to provide adequate sidewalk clearance around the shelter. The Committee also had to weigh security issues, weather protection, cost, and maintenance concerns in addition to the aesthetic considerations. The final design, as shown in the Attachment "A ", is a dusty gray three -sided metal design with a simulated mission clay tile metal roof. The walls are perforated metal, providing good weather protection without creating security concerns. The benches will be matching metal, backless with "nerf bars" dividing the bench into three seating spaces. The nerf bars provide comfort to people as they sit by defining their space and providing a grip for getting up from the bench. They also inhibit people from lying across the bench and preventing others from taking a seat. The shelters will be thirteen feet in length and the benches are six feet. This will allow a wheel chair to fit within the shelter in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. In 2001, the City secured a CMAQ grant of an unspecified amount, through VCTC for five bus shelters. This was part of a regional bus shelter /bike locker program coordinated by VCTC and it planned to install shelters of its own design. The City's Transportation and Streets Committee did not like the VCTC design. It was planned to place the shelters at the Moorpark Metrolink Station since they did not have the right look for the City streets. Three cement pads were poured last year at the Station using a 100% minor capital grant from the Caltrans rail program. The original plan called for the remaining two shelters to replace existing wooden benches at the station. However, on February 12, staff met with VCTC staff and it was agreed that Moorpark and the other recipient agencies could bid their own shelter designs. As a result, staff recommends that only three CMAQ shelters be placed at the station and that the other two shelters be placed at Moorpark City Transit bus stops in addition to three City- funded shelters. The CMAQ (Congestion Management /Air Quality) grant will pay for 88.50 of five shelters. If the City procures an additional three (3) shelters as recommended, the cost to the City is estimated to be $4,900.19 per unit for eight (8) bus shelters, for a total outlay of City TDA funds of $39,201.52, including a loo contingency. The 88.5% CMAQ grant would be $44,111.06, for a total project cost of $79,748.60. This is based on estimates from vendors and the actual bid results Transit bus shelters CC Meeting of March 5, 2003 Page 3 experienced by the City of San Buenaventura for a very similar bus shelter project recently bid by that city. It is quite possible that the City's actual costs may be somewhat lower than the estimate. With the grant funding, the unit cost to the City's is estimated to be reduced from almost $10,000 per unit to $4,900.19 per unit for eight (8) installed bus shelters. The funds for this project were included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2002/03 budget. On the attached sheets there is a front elevation of the shelter design, side elevations, a layout plan (showing future trash receptacles), a bench elevation, and cost estimates. To expedite this project, staff requests that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the procurement and installation for transit bus shelters and the Council is asked to authorize staff to proceed with the bid process for this project at this time. The final determination for shelter locations will be made by staff based on ridership and site compatibility. To assist in finalizing the siting decisions, staff will review a report from VCTC showing boardings and alightings by bus stop. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans and specifications for the procurement and installation of transit bus shelters, and authorize staff to proceed with the bid process for this project. Attachment A LINCustom Manufacturing Bus Shelter Programs 12536 Chadron Ave Hawthorne CA 90250 Phone 310- 978 -2000 Fax 310- 9784000 City of Moorpark Shelter Systems Spec Sheets 1. Bids are required for the entire work described herein, the contractor shall possess a Class D -34 Prefabricated Equipment license at the time the award of contract. 2. Structural Materials: Aluminum shall conform to 6063 T6 or better. Structural steel shall conform to ASTM A -36, minimum yield strength 36,000 psi. Structural tubing shall have rounded edges and conform to ASTM A501 or A53 Grad B. Shelters shall be constructed of modular interchangeable extruded aluminum and steel tubes. All materials must be coated before attachment where disimilar materials join. Shelters shall be rated to withstand wind loads of 75 MPH 3. Shelter structures will be non - advertising and without lighting. Shelters shall be manufactured by LNI Custom Manufacturing Inc. (12536 Chadron Ave, Hawthorne CA 90250) Model SS -HP -13 Custom with Met -Tile color Mission Clay Roof with steel perforated back and sides to be primed and painted dusty Gray Matthews MP 34938. Shelters shall have an overall length of 13' -8" x 5' -8" width x 9' -10" Height with ceiling. Shelters shall be secured to the existing sidewalk with 4 shoe base surface mounts that telescope up and down for leveling, with two 1/2" diameter 4" long expansion bolts per shoe. Recommended paint Manufacture Mathews two stage Epoxy Primer and Paint urethane. And or approved equal. 4. Benches: Benches shall be fabricated with 1 %2" round steel pipe and formed 10 gauge 1/4" diameter holes Perforated Steel Material without a back. Two 1 %2" diameter 1' -8" width anti- vagrant bars welded to 1/4" thick plates. 6' -0" in length and be manufactured by LNI Custom Manufacturing Inc. (12536 Chadron Ave, Hawthorne CA 90250) Model SS- 1020 -6 painted Dusty Gray or Black by recommended paint Manufacture Mathews two stage Epoxy Primer and urethane paint and or approved equal. ��()137 13'-8 " Overall Length Of Bus Shelter 21-011 9'-8 " Ridge 2'-0 11 10 ' j 3'-8 3'-8 31-811 110 upening(Typ.)' Opening (Typ. ) 311 3 "-l'i -3 3 CL I = I 7 91, 10 10 Welded—Z .l5 (Typical) Q) 0 a) P C� U') C 01 D Zo —41 Cn 611 SS -HP -13 Custom Shelter Front Elevation Scale: 1/2 " =1' -0" QTY= 10 UNITS "Met Tile" Mission Clay Roof 2"x 4"x 1/8" Thick Aluminum Rectangular Tube Frame (Typical). Yx Yx 3/16" Horizontal Steel Square Tube Bracing. ,060" thick X 114" did. Hole X 3/8" stg Ctrs. Finish: Point Dusty Gray Matthews MP 34938 6-0" Long Bench Part No. 1020-6 3"x Yx 3/16" Vertical Steel Square Tube Insert Support ( 4 Places ), NOTE: Entire Structure ( Except Decra Stone Coated Steel Tile Roof ) To be painte Dusty Gray Matthews IMP 3493J8 PROTECT NAME City Of Moorpark Bus Shelters I ;,Wk #, 02072635 APPROVAL DATE I .... .... DATE By I REVISION ADDRESS park Ave. isalf. As Noted ...... 21 IEII� Dbw#sr PL/AC ... . . pay STATE MT, ark, HN HONE ID[SISNa4y. 12.12,02 JUMBERS ISAIISPfMN Orlando C; FZ CIO on PROJECT NAME City Of Moorpark Bus Shelters M-01a N. 02072635 APPROVAL DATE DATE By RNSION 99 Norlh Moor rk Ave. KAU. As Noted _T" MTATI Moorpark, CA PRMNB?' PUAC wrrvy I EN 9j.f/j;#&rF, 12.12,02 MIT leiIS41ESPaSow Orlando Vargasj 5'-8 " O.A. 5'-8 " O.A. Width Width 711 4'-0 11 711 7 4'-0 7 3 inside Opening 3 3 inside Opening "Met­T IIe'MMon Clay Roof CL CL -------- 2"x 4"x 1/8" Thick Aluminum Rectangular - Tube Frame (Typical). A 3"x 3"x 3/16" Horizontal Steel '77 Tube Bracing. Q 10 C14 10 060" thick X 114" dia. Hole X 3/8" sfg Finish: Point Dusty Gray Matthews MP 34938 Q Yx 3"x 3/16" Vertical Steel Square Tube- C � Insert Support ( 4 Places 0 C? 6-0" Long Bench 60 Part No, 1020-6 2-1/2"x 2-1/2"x 1/4" Thick Steel Tube Sleeve, ­­Welded To 3/8" Thick Steel Mounting Base C? Plate. A NOTE: Entire Structure ( Except Decro Stone Left Side Elevation Coated Steel Tile Roof ) To be paint e Right Side Elevation Dusty Gray Matthews MP 34938 Scale: 1/2 " =1' -0" Scale: 1/2"=1' -0" PROJECT NAME City Of Moorpark Bus Shelters M-01a N. 02072635 APPROVAL DATE DATE By RNSION 99 Norlh Moor rk Ave. KAU. As Noted _T" MTATI Moorpark, CA PRMNB?' PUAC wrrvy I EN 9j.f/j;#&rF, 12.12,02 MIT leiIS41ESPaSow Orlando Vargasj Bus Stop Sign +/- 3' -5 " t.b.d. 1N- IMPROVE SITE ONLY 4 - oncrete Pad 4" Deep x 4I -0" Vide (Varie Depth). 5' -0" Long Bench 'art No. 1020 -6 _ ________ _______________________ 2 30 ,SS Trash �urb R"ICeptacle N Back of Curb. 13' -8 rr Overall Length of Bus Shelter (SS -HP -13 Custom) +/- 3' -5 " t.b.d. Street Name BUS SHELTER, BENCH & TRASH RECEPTACLE LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1/2" =1 ' -0" CNy Of Moorpark, CA Scope Of Work: Plan Elevation Pg. 2 Bus Shelter, Bench and Trash Receptacle SS -HP-13 Custom Shelter Pg. 3 Front elevation SS -HP-13 Custom Sheller Pg. 4 Side elevation SS -HP-13 Custom Shelter Pg. 5 Roof Plan SS -HP -13 Custom Sheller Pg. 6 Roof Frame Details SS -HP-13 Custom Shelter Pg. 7 Roof Section Details SS -HP•13 Custom Sheller Pa 8-9 Partial Left /Front Elevation Details (Attachment) 6 FT BENCH PART #1020.6 Pa. 10-11 2630SS Me Mesh Trash Receptacle Pg, 12 L Details F PROTECT NAME Ci Of Moor ark Bus Shelters oxaxrxc xo. 02072635 APPROVAL DATE ��� DATE BY REVISION SHEET ADDRESS 99 North Moor ark Ave. SCALE Rs Noted QY��y_ - - - „ SM /STATE Moorpark, CA ORAWNBY PL/AC _ - xf 2 or IZ 'TUIPHONE OfS /6NA4fE 12.12.02 �,]. NUMBERS S&FSPfBSOK, Orlando Vargas °_ ^^ - ^ ^•� "` ' I" h A 1" 1 1 /4" 1 1 /2" Dia. X 1/8" Thick Steel L CL Pipe Frame. / -1 /4" Thick Steel Mounting N A Plate At Base. Plan View Rolled 10 Gauge Perforated Metal Bench. NOTE: Y-0 3/8" Scale: 1 1/2" =1 ' -0" led 1 1/2" Dia. X 1/8" L-k Steel Pipe Hand il, Welded As Required. Gauge x 114" Round les Steel Perforated 9tal Screen, Welded Bottom Edges of /2" Dia. Steel Pipe. /2" Dia. Steel Pipe ont & Back), flded to Steel le Frame. 1" thick Steel Plate Base With (2) -3/8" i. X 4" Long Steel 3s & Shields. Scale: 1 1/2"=1'-O" QTY= 10 UNITS PROTECT NAME: Cq 01 Moor ark Bus Shelters uuiwMC Ha 02072635 rnovnL ogre Q DATE By REVISION SHEET wr DRESS 99 Narlh Moor ark Ave. SfA26 As Noted CITY / STATE. Moo( park, CA ORAMNBY 'VAC NNY EtEPHONE: 10 OF 12 NUMBER: SIUMISBN Odaedo Var as a rt n x E5 N 0 rt a 0 a 7 Note: Please be advised the pricing below are reasonable estimates for the shelters specified. Descri tp ion OW Unit Price Tax Install &Delivery Sub total Total SS- SS- HR -13' 8 $7,255.00 $598.54 $1,555.00 $9,408.54 $75,268.30 Spanish Tile Roof Shelter Aluminum / Steel construction w/ acrylic poly painted surface All welded construction w/ modular field set -up Perforated screen back panels Shoebase mount LNI 6' V Bench 8 $425.00 $35.06 $100.00 $560.06 $4,480.50 Bench w/ standard nerf bars Perforated Back Matez unit subtotal: $9,968.60 All Steel Construction Shoebase mount total estimate: $79,748.80 5 88.5% CMAQ Grant for five she] $44,111.06 11.5% local match $5,731.95 3 City funded shelters $29,905.80 Contingency $3,563.77 Total City expenditure $39,201.52 C. a rt rt 0 0 m rt 9 n 0 rt MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, ATCM /City Clerk DATE: February 26, 2003 (CC Meeting of 3/5/03) SUBJECT: Consider Leaving One Teen Council Position Vacant Until the Next Regularly Scheduled Recruitment BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On September 4, 2002, the City Council made eleven appointments to the Teen Council for a one -year term to end on June 30, 2003. One of those appointees, Taylor Skinner (grade 9), has resigned due to other commitments. Staff is recommending that his position not be filled due to the length of the remaining term of office, as permitted by the Council's Appointment Policy. In addition, there is no need to fill the position, because there are ten remaining appointees on the Teen Council and the minimum number per the Council adopted Teen Council Policy is seven, and there are other 9th grade representatives. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur that the vacant teen council position will not be filled due to the length of the remaining term of office. a mcptcXt cyj. ORDINANCE NO. 291 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 6.04 GENERAL PROVISIONS, CHAPTER 6.08 ANIMAL CONTROL, CHAPTER 6.12 IMPOUNDMENT, AND CHAPTER 6.16 LICENSING OF CATS AND DOGS, OF TITLE 6, ANIMALS, TO ALLOW DESIGNATED CITY STAFF TO ENFORCE TITLE 6 WHEREAS, the City Council determined that it is necessary to provide for animal control in the City to protect public health, property and the quality of life for the community; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2000, the City Council determined that certain City staff shall provide animal control services in the City, in addition to, and in lieu of, animal control services provided by the county of Ventura Animal Regulation Department. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Se.ction 6.04.010 of Chapter 6.04 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.04.010 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: The terms "animal regulation department ", "department of animal regulation ", "department of animal control" and "animal control department" mean the county of Ventura animal regulation department, and /or the City Animal /Vector Control Division, as designated by the City Manager. The term "animal pound" means any dog pound, animal shelter, temporary animal pound, or pound vehicle owned or operated by the City, Ventura County, or any other entity on behalf of the City, or under contract to the City. The term "county health officer" means the Ventura County health officer and any duly appointed deputy thereof. Ordinance No. 291 Page 2 The terms "director of the animal regulation department ", "director of animal control" and "poundmaster" mean the person in charge of the animal regulation department of the county of Ventura and any duly appointed deputy of the director of the animal regulation department, and the City Manager, and any duly authorized job classification of city officers and employees or other person designated by resolution of the City Council to exercise duties and authority of the poundmaster. A person "harbors" a dog when he or she feeds or shelters the dog for a period of thirty days or longer. The term "livestock" includes horses, ponies, mules, burros, jacks and jennies, cows, bulls, calves, heifers, sheep, goats, swine, hogs, pigs, and all other domestic or domesticated animals other than household pets. A person is the "owner" of an animal when he or she has either legal title to the animal or has the legal right of custody of the animal. A dog "runs at large" when it is upon private property without the permission of the person owning or occupying the property, or when it is upon public property and is not upon a leash. Livestock "runs at large" when upon livestock property without the permission of the person owning or occupying the property, or when upon public property and not under the immediate control of a responsible person capable of controlling such animal. The term "tax collector" means the Ventura County tax collector and any duly appointed deputy thereof. SECTION 2. Section 6.08.030 of Chapter 6.08 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.08.030 Leash Requirements. It is unlawful for any person who has the charge or control of a dog to be in a location other than on the property of such person or the property of the owner of the dog including on any public street, alley, lane, park or place Ordinance No. 291 Page 3 of whatever nature open to and used by the public, in the City unless such dog is securely leashed and the leash is no longer than eight feet and held continuously in the hands of a responsible person capable of controlling such dog, or unless the dog is securely confined in a vehicle. It is unlawful for any person to suffer or permit any dog owned, harbored or controlled by such person to be on any private property in the City without the permission of the person owning or occupying said private property. Every person who violates any of the provisions of this section is guilty of an infraction. SECTION 3. Section 6.08.060 of Chapter 6.08 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.08.060 Authority to inspect animals or licenses. Any person who has an custody or control that refuses to exhibit such inspection upon demand officer, or duly author misdemeanor /infraction. animal in his or her possession, willfully or maliciously fails or animal or any license therefor for by the poundmaster or any peace ized City employee is guilty of a SECTION 4. Section 6.08.070 of Chapter 6.08 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.08.070 Noisy animals. Any person who keeps or permits to remain upon any property in the City under his or her ownership or control, other than in an appropriately zoned and licensed kennel or animal hospital, any dog or other animal which by continuous barking, whining or other noise unreasonably disturbs the peace, comfort or quiet of any resident of the neighborhood shall be guilty of a misdemeanor /infraction. SECTION S. Section 6.08.090 of Chapter 6.08 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.08.090 Dog defecation -- Removal. A. It is unlawful for the owner or person having custody of any dog to suffer, permit, or allow such dog to Ordinance No. 291 Page 4 defecate on any private property in the City without the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of the property or on any public property in the City. B. It is unlawful for the owner or person having custody of any dog that defecates on any private property in the City without the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of the property or on any public property in the City to fail to immediately remove the feces by placing it in a closed container or to thereafter fail to deposit the feces in a trash receptacle. C. Every person who violates any provisions of this section is guilty of an infraction. The provisions of this section shall not apply to on -duty police dogs and to a person with a disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.) who is accompanied by a service animal, which has been trained by a person, licensed under Section 7200 et. seq. of the Business and Professions Code. SECTION 6. Chapter 6.12.010 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.12.010 Poundmaster -- Enforcement authority. It shall be the duty of the director of the animal regulation department or any duly authorized City officer or employee to discharge the duties of poundmaster, and to enforce the provisions of this title and any resolution of the City Council adopted pursuant hereto. SECTION 7. Section 6.12.020 of Chapter 6.12 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.12.020 Interfering with poundmaster prohibited. Every person who breaks open a dog pound, animal shelter, temporary pound, or pound vehicle, or who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs the poundmaster or duly authorized City employee in the discharge of, or attempt to discharge, any 4 7 r Ordinance No. 291 Page 5 duty of his or her office, is guilty of a misdemeanor /infraction. SECTION 8. Section 6.16.040 of Chapter 6.16 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 6.16.040 Fee. A. The fee for the license required by this chapter shall be as prescribed by resolution of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, unless superceded by resolution of the City Council. B. The fee prescribed for a dog or cat which has been spayed or neutered, as verified by a veterinarian's certificate, shall be no more than fifty percent (50o) of the fee for a dog or cat of the same sex which has not been spayed or neutered. SECTION 9. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 10. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. Ordinance No. 291 Page 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2003. ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk Patrick Hunter, Mayor