The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1986 0602 CC REG ITEM 07CJAMES D. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tern ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer I , :. ITEM_ TO: The Honorable City Council (City Council Meeting of 6/2/86) FROM: Diane Eaton, Associate Planner. <�" DATE: May 30, 1986 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) D q r i i nn This Residential Planned Development proposal is for a 136 unit apartment complex located on the east side of Moorpark Road immediately north of "Park Springs" a 128 unit condominium project. It is approximately 500 feet north of New Los Angeles Avenue. Further details of this project are in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission. Since there are no dedications for streets or other easements, the net and gross acreages are the same, and since there are no slopes on the property, the applicant was able to utilize the total property for maximum development. Thus, the applicant was able to maximize density (14.87 dwelling units per acre). While at the same time providing wide separation between buildings and ample Open- Space. Staff has been very impressed with the professional approach, cooperative attitude of the applicant (Lincoln Property Company). The Park & Recreation Commission recom- mendations as to recreational amenities have been incorporated in the conditions and the applicant has modified his plan accordingly. The applicant prepared the plans using the then current standard for parking i.e., 2 -1/4 spaces for one bedroom units and 2 -1/2 spaces for two bedroom units. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission was unanimous in it's support of the project. The only concern was over the ingress /egress. There was considerable discussion by the Traffic Engineer for the applicant and the City Engineer pointing out that a joint driveway for this project and the existing Condominium project to the south would result in less points of conflict and thus would be safer. The project has been conditioned to provide a stub to the condominium project in the event that a joint agreement can be worked out. As of this writing it appears that all parties are tentatively agreeable to the arrangement (per the current ballot process). 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL p. 2 - May 30, 1986 SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) Recommended Action 1. Find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment and that this body has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder and; 2. Adopt the proposed findings and approve PD -1051 subject to the attached conditions. /crl PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this Permit'-.is-granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date.' The Planning Commission may, at their discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. �. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject use, there shall be filed with the Community Development Department the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s), or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this permit. , 3. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the city because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 4. That permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or operation under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of this permit. 5. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of RPD -15 (Residential Planned Development with an allowed density Of 15 DU /AC) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 8. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, but any Major Modification to be considered by the City Council. -1- May 14, 1986 May 30, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) City Engineer memo dated May 23, 1986 - PD -1051 Revised Conditions , modified as follows: 4. The improvements sh�ll'.include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing in accordance with the City of Moorpark Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. Sidewalks per plate E -5. b. Driveways shall be per plate E -2 modified to be 50 feet wide with a 15 foot or greater radius curb return. this driveway shall facilitate this development as well as the adjacent development to the south and shall be aligned directly opposite Roberts Avenue. Developer shall remove existing driveway on the southerly development and replace with appropriate curb and gutter if agreement can be reached with this prop- erty woner; driveway curb return shall be constrLmted so as to provide for handicapped access. C. Signing and stripping plans shall be prepared for Moorpark Road as deemed as appropriate and necessary by the City and CalTrans. d. If any hazardous waste is encountered during any phase of the construction of this project all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, Sherrif's Department and City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not be allowed to proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies through the City Inspector. CIL- �J 2 C RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -98 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 ON THE APPLICATIQN OF LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on April 9, 1986 and May 14, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application filed by Lincoln Property Company requesting approval to construct a 136 residential rental units. Located on the east side of Moorpark Road, immediately north of "Park Springs ", a 128 unit condominium project, approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant effect of the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff report dated May 14, 1986, which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein are hereby approved; SECTION 2. That at its meeting of May 14, 1986, the Planning Commission took action to request staff to prepare a Resolution with the attached conditions approving Planned Development Permit No. PD -1051; said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Holland, Keenan, Claffey, Hartley and LaPerch; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 1986. Chairman ATTEST: 14- Acting Secretary PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 9. That the design,.maintenance and operation of the permit are and facilities tWvreon shall comply with all applicable require- ments and enactments* of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 10. That prior to the issuance of zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with ounty Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for approval. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the - inauguration of this permit. Shall be as follows: - a. The final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. b. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be of a drought tolerant low -water using variety. C. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. d. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. e. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhea. lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. f. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 9. Open Space - Shrubbery along and around the interior walkways shall be low so that visibility is not obstructed. h. That the continued landscape maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City inspector with- in 30 days after notification. -2- Mav 14. 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) P Y) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITONS: 11. That the final design of site improvements, including mater colors, and fenci4g,'.is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. g 12. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air - conditioning equipment) shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of zone clearance, the final design and location of equipment and screening must be approved by the Planning Commission. 13. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. 14. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection control device shall be installed on the water system in accord- ance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 15. Trash disposal areas shall be provided in locations which wil l interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building andt shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid wall enclosure. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 16. That all utilities be underground. 17- That all parking areas and driveways shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, and (or) curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscape areas. 18- That it is the contractor's responsibility to use watering, or other methods as directed by the city to control dust through- out the project. 19. That all windows on the west elevations of buildings facing Moorpark Road, shall be inoperable double sash windows; i.e., two windows separated by a 2.5 - 3 inch airspace. In one pane, 3/16 inch glass, and in the other, 1/8 inch glass should be used. 20. That three - sixteenths (3/16) inch glass or windows, with a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25 or greater; shall be used on buildings which face west onto Moorpark Road. - 3 May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITONS: 11. That the final design of site improvements, including materials, colors, and fenci- og,.is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 12. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air - conditioning equipment) shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of zone clearance, the final design and location of equipment and screening must be approved by the Planning Commission. 13. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. 14. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection control device shall be installed on the water system in accord- ance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 15. Trash disposal areas shall be provided in locations which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid wall enclosure. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 16. That all utilities be underground. 17. That all parking areas and driveways shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, and (or) curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscape areas. 18. That it is the contraA is responsibility to use watering, or other methods as directed by the city to control dust through- out the project. 19. That all windows on the west elevations of buildings facing Moorpark Road, shall be inoperable double sash windows; i.e., two windows separated by a 2.5 - 3 inch airspace. In one pane, 3/16 inch glass, and in the other, 1/8 inch glass be used. 20. That three - sixteenths (3/16) inch glass or windows, with a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25 or greater; shall be used on buildings which face west onto Moorpark Road. - 3- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: (Lincoln Property Company) 21. That all other wipdows and all other elevations may be standard single strength gtass (SSB) . 22. That no balconies are allowed to face west onto Moorpark Road. 23. That subject to final review by the Park and Recreation Commission the developer shall provide: a. An 2500 square foot recreational structure, located near the west of the project. b. A pool, spa, volleyball court, paddle tennis, and tennis court. C. An additional bar -b -que facility towards th; east of the site. d. A car -wash facility along the eastern boundary line of the site. 24. That the developer shall assure adequate provisions to protect the safety of children by fencing and gating pool areas, and safety buffering any tot lots proposed to be located adjacent to a pool area. 25. That the project shall incorporate meandering sidewalks. 26. That storage lockers are to be provided in carports or garages or attached to the exterior of each unit. 27. That the developer shall provide solar heating for all spas. 28. That irrigation shall be regulated so as not to occur at times of high evaporation; i.e., during high winds or extreme high heat. 29 That the developer shall provide low -flush toilets as required by Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code. 30. That the developer shall provide low -flow showers and faucets as required by California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20- 1406F. 31. That the developer shall insulate hot water lines in water recirculating systems as required by the California Energh Commission regulations. 32. Fencing Plan - Prior to issuance of zone clearance the developer shall submit to the city for review and approval by the Director Of Community Development a fencing plan indicating a 8 foot block wall to be constructed between the 8 foot carport wall on the north boundary line. In additions, a 6 foot block wall on the east property line shall be constructed. -4- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 21. That all other windows and all other elevations may be standard single strength gtass (SSB). 22. That no balconies are allowed to face west onto Moorpark Road. 23. That subject to final review by the Park and Recreation Commission the developer shall provide: a. An 2500 square foot recreational structure, located near the west of the project. b. A pool, spa, volleyball court, paddle tennis, and tennis court. C. An additional bar -b -que facility towards th; east of the site. d. A car -wash facility along the eastern boundary line of the site. I 24. That the developer shall assure adequate provisions to protect the safety of children by fencing and gating pool areas, and safety buffering any tot lots proposed to be located adjacent to a pool area. 25. That the project shall incorporate meandering sidewalks. 26. That storage lockers are to be provided in carports or garages or attached to the exterior of each unit. 27. That the developer shall provide solar heating for all spas. 28. That irrigation shall be regulated so as not to occur at times of high evaporation; i.e., during high winds or extreme high heat. 29 That the developer shall provide low -flush toilets as required by Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code. 30. That the developer shall provide low -flow showers and faucets as required by California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20- 1406F. 31. That the developer shall insulate hot water lines in water recirculating systems as required by the California Energh Commission regulations. 32. Fencing Plan - Prior to issuance of zone clearance the developer shall submit to the city for review and approval by the Director of Community Development a fencing plan indicating a 8 foot block wall to be constructed between the 8 foot carport wall on the north boundary line. In additions, a 6 foot block wall on the east property line shall be constructed. —4— May 14, 1986 4; PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 34. That prior to construction, zone clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. 35. That prior to issuance of zone clearance, an "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. I. 36. That prior to recordation, the applicant shall pay all fees pursuant to the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Sections 8279 -4 et seq., for the purpose of providing fees in lieu of land dedication for local park acquisition and /or development of park facilities for the future residents of the subdivision. 4.a. May 14, 1986 CONDITIONS FOR APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Lincoln Property Company May 14, 1986 1. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. 4. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing in accordance with the City of Moorpark Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. Sidewalks per plate E -5. b. Driveway shall be per plate E -2 modified to be 50' wide with 10' radius curb returns. This driveway shall facilitate this development as well as the adjacent development to the south and shall be aligned directly opposite Roberts Avenue. Developer shall remove existing driveway on the southerly develop- ment and replace with appropriate curb and gutter; driveway curb returns shall be constructed so as to provide for handicapped access. 5. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right - of -way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 6• That prior to zone clearance the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall deposit with the City of moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. -5- CONDITIONS FOR: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Lincoln Property Company May 14, 1986 8. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No.2372. 9. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after developme JO;.1 CQuantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, J ses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 10 1-1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from flooding. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. -Z- -14. Developer shall construct a bus turnout per Plate D -13 with transition and bus bay lengths each being 60 feet. The transition into the bus bay shall begin at the main driveway end of curb return. 9M. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 food high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. Drive thru security has not been successful for similar construction projects. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) shall be properly secured prior to installation during nonworking hours. All serial numbers shall be recorded for identification purposes. 4. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 5. Condition No. 4 would apply to any construction trailer that would house valuable property and could be utilized on models or at locations where articles of value ( #3) might be kept. 6. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground form tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable or illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage- resistant covers. 7. Lighting plans showing type and location of all lighting devices shall be submitted to the Sheriff's Department for review and approval. �_ - -_ _ parking lot -- area sFiaTI -- -te a h to keep c rteu =at- i�9- smaQth ly __ wide 9. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. 10. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 11. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 12. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 13. Each single unit Constructed under the same general plan shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct occupancies. 14. Walkways - All walkways will be well lighted and situated so that surrounding residents will have a clear view of all pedestrian travels. 15. Fences - Wrought iron fences to be errected around swimming pool area for safety reasons. Should be 6 feet in height for security. -8- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow, a vehicle waitin4,f6r entrance to be completely off the public roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing in both directions. the method of gate control shall be subject to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 2. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for the approval of the location of fire hydrants. show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and inservice prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. ° Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4 inch and two 2 -1/2 inch outlet. ° The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. ° Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. Fire hydrants shall be 24 inch on center, recessed in from the curb face. 4. That the minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. 5. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1250 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 6. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 7. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set- back more that 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure is not visible from the street, the address numbers shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. Individual dwelling units shall have 4 inch numbers. 8. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of I Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings ! are to be identified. -9- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEARTMENT CONDITIONS: 9. That building plaids of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 of more, shall be submitted to the Ventura Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 10. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in apartment buildings according to National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet X10. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to the review of the Fire Chief. 11. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in, except when the structure is divided into areas of less than 5,000 square feet with a two hour fire separation wall in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. —10— May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 VENTURA COUNTY WATER WORKS DISTRICT NO.I (Lincoln Property Company) 1. The applicant shall submit engineering data, satisfactory to the District, that demgnstrates sufficient fireflow is available to all parcels. 2. The applicant shall submit engineering data satisfactory to the district showing that sewers are designed to carry the peak flow rates from all areas tributary to them, including future developed areas. The construction of off -site water and sewer mains may be required to extend to the District's existing trunklines. Note: the District is in the early stages of planning a sewage treatment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of-flow into the existing plant is directly related to the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed prior to completion of any plan expansion. This could cause a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant to insure the plan expansion will be complete when sewer service begins. -11- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PARKS & RECREATION ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: 1. Increase the size ,of the pool to approximately 25' x 601. 2. Increase the size of the spa to comfortably accommodate 12 to 14 people. 3. Increase the deck area around the pool and spa proportionally to the existing deck area to accommodate the increase in the size of the pool and spa. 4. Add a tot lot just north of the open play area between buildings 2 and 3. Tot lot area should encompass 31000 square feet with 50 percent of the area dedicated to play equipment to be selected by the developer with staff approval Tot lot shall be fenced and have adequate security lighting subject to staff- approval. 5. Add a half -court basketball court with a concrete surface with location subject to staff approval. 6. Increase the number of barbecues to the following: a. Two gas barbecues shall be provided at the office /recreation building area around the pool. b. One gas barbecue shall be provided near the tot lot with circular concrete picnic table with benches, subject to staff approval. C. One gas barbecue pit shall be provided at the east end of the project, complete with a wood trellis cover (gazebo) and concrete benches, subject to staff approval. 7. Amount of open space to remain at the originally presented design except for the increased size of decking and inclusion of the tot lot. -12- May 14, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the City Council N . of the City of Moorpark, California, on Monday , the 2 day of June , 19 86 , beginning at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m . , in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021, for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project herein - below described. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that, pursuant to California State Law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that, based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would occur; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Planned Development Permit No. PD -1051 Applicant: Lincoln Property Company Proposal: Request approval to construct 136 residential apartment units. Location: On Moorpark Road, approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. Assessor's Parcel No.: 512 -0 -150, -025 NOTTr.P NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Director of Community Developmeat or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: ( 805) 529-6864. DATED: May 19, , 19 86 j B y Title Administrative Secretary AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on I caused to be mail d the attached 7� -le I Al /3 by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at California addressed to Dated: r Deputy City Clerk Kiaus�a uerda Kettendurg Herbert & Renate Straus 555 Hollyburne_Lo. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 William & Joan Shelly et al 26022- D.Alizia Canyon Calabasas, CA 91302 Rogelic & Toni Rodriguez Fidel & Mary Barcenas 568 Moorpark Rd. #75 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ronald Cisneros 20355 Sherman Way #242 Canoga Park, CA 91306 Byron, Eleanor & Barry Disselhorst 4376 Mill Valley Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Michael Chulak & Sidney Brody 272 Cedar Heights Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Estrella Velilla 4026 Calle Mira Monte Newbury Park, CA 91320 Judith Ballback 564 Moorpark #80 Moorpark, CA 93021 CC &F 23 Properties Inc. 911 Wilshire Blvd. #1010 Los Angeles, CA 90017 SWS Assoc. 10920 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 A T T s 1. �A,..,. ,.: w Von +ary burns ratty Alvarez '137 Roberts Ave. 196 Harry St. loorperk, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ianet Wirth Richard & Alice Mae Hembre •63 Roberts Ave. 447 Sarah Ave. loorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 onald Smith et al Billy & Dorinda Cooksey 24 Salem Ave. 435 Sarah St. xnard, CA 93030 Moorpark, CA 93021 eal Elden & Mary Lee Wayman Robert & Delia Perea B4 Roberts 423 Sarah Ave. oorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 !sley & Joan Craig James & Delpha Owen )18 Rocky Dells Dr. 411 Sarah St. •escott, AZ 86301 Moorpark, CA 93021 -escencio Sepulveda Catherine Sauk 7 Esther Dr. 210 Sierra orpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 nald & Regina Krepel Randall & Sandra Strong 3 Harry St. 298 Harry St. Drpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 sus & Refugio Torres Lamberto & Theresa Gonzalez 3 Harry St. 286 Harry St. )rpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 iald & Valinda Greene Manuel & Della Gutierrez Harry St. 290 Sierra Ave. :rpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 id & Delonn Arenas Frederick & Michelle Jarvis Harry St. 254 Harry St. rpa rk , CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 ►el & Eva Fletes Peter & Maxine Delicata Harry St. 236 Harry St. park, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Patricia Rowe 153 Fraser Ln. Ventura; CA 93001 Arnoldo & Alma Gonzalez 428 Sarah Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Roy & Anna Wells 448 Sarah Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Ruby Barrett P.O. Box 454 Moorpark, CA 93021 Lauren Mills 492 Sarah St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Hortensia Castro 493 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Gilberto & Emma Ramirez 467 Susan St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Manuel & Milda Garcia 447 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Leland & Betty Cotter Herman & Jo Ann Streiff 21021 Devonshire #103 Chatsworth, CA 91311 Daniel & Carol Melson 428 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 David & Bonnie Payte 448 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 :suli-no & Consuelo Rios Del & Janet Griese Douglas & Christine Holmes -,8 Susan Ave. 8400 Waters Rd. .316 Hickory Grove )orpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 lanche Shields John Barone Richard Watson 14 Susan St. Ben & Marianna Dengler 517 Moorpark Rd. #11 )orpark, CA 93021 P .0. ,Pox 4 Moorpark, CA 93021 Newbury Park, CA 91320 iymond Caren et al John & Cindy Newton Robert & Elsina & Sharon Cr( 135 Wilshire Blvd. 507 -4 Moorpark Rd. 24537 Dry Canyon Cold Ck Rd. !verly Hills.-CA 90212 Moorpark, CA 93021 Calabasas, CA 91302 icific Tel -Tel Co. Morris & Isabelle paulscn George & Iras Lusk tO New Montgomery St. 1746 N.'Stanley Ave. 3002 Sandi Dr. in Francisco, CA 94105 Hollywood, CA 90046 Chico, CA 95926 UN: Supervisor of Taxes r !ntura County F1 Ctrl Dist. Hughes & Westermeyer Kelvin & Betty Loh )0 S. Victoria Ave. 507 -3 Moorpark Rd. 686 Piropo Ct. !ntura, CA 93009 Moorpark, CA 93021 Camarillo, CA 93010 TN: R W Agent Jane Charnay Thomas & Elke Trilling 507 A Moorpark Rd. 3240 Inglewood Blvd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Los Angeles, CA 90066 ,orpark Development Gordon Bergelson Charles & Sylvia Griswold 915 Ventura Blvd. #200 P.O. Box U01 1646 La Jolla Dr. ,cino, CA 91436 Canoga Park, CA 91304 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 TN: Martin L. Sturman nald & Virginia Henthorn Benjamin & Lidia Mauer Theodore, Siegfried & 5 Laguna Dr. 39 Sandra Ct. Ella Enke mi Valley, CA 93065 Newbury Park, CA 91320 527 -20 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 egory & Virginia Mendoza Lobelia Apartments Limited Roger & Margaret Poiridt 21 Thoroughbred Rd. 77 Rolling Oaks Dr. Ste. 101 417 Katherine St.. nderson, NY 89015 Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 Simi Valley, CA-93063 ATTN: National Properties ita Paula Enterprises Inc. Walter Madrid & . Box 3598 Irene Wi.l l i ams itura, CA 93006 20735 Gbrmain St. Chatsworth, CA 91311 meth & Sharon Scribner Frank Major finis & Diane Hotchkiss 24537 Dry Cany913Sald Ck. Rd. Flinn Ave. _ _ Calabasas, CA Robert, Donna & Terry Luiz 527 C Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Laurie Brunet 28870 Conejo View Dr. Agoura, CA 91301 Stephen & Gyvette Thomas 526 Moorpark Rd. #108 Moorpark, CA 93021 Albert & Rose Kline 16600 Bosque Dr. Encino, CA 91436 Donald & Lois Hoffman 781 Chestnut St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Arthur & Arlene Dalessandro 31721 Kentfield Ct. Westlake Village, CA 91361 "homas & Patricia Brancati 1121 Del una Dr. rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 ohn & Judith Bailey 20 -C Moorpark Rd. oorpark, CA 93021 agar, Monika & Ann Coyle 592 N. Cayton 1mi Valley, CA 93065 ,ather Mallon 15 Palmas Ct. eanside, CA 92056 nald, Virginia & icy Sorensen tri l filar Ct Charles . & Lois Boyl i n 95 E. Ave. de las Flores Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Wayne & Bonnie Guthmiller 516 N. Moorpark Rd. #114 Moorpark, CA 93021 Jill Forman 516 N. Moorpark Rd. #113 Moorpark, CA 93021 John & Debra Dyke 510 Moorpark Rd. #117 Moorpark, CA 93021 Vera Toth & Linda Mrasak 510 Moorpark Rd. #118 Moorpark, CA 93021 Richard Casanova 510 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Michael & Jill Buckner 502 Moorpark Rd. #125 Moorpark, CA 93021 Terry Van Ballegoijen 6407 Melray St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Marshall & Nancy Davidson 502 Moorpark Rd. #127 Moorpark, CA 93021 Dale & Kathy Norton 2801 Fairbanks Simi Valley, CA 93063 r Mary Mc Larnon & r Larsen Ragner 971 Westlake Blvd. Ste. B Westlake Village, CA 91361 #119 James & Virginiann Spellman Scott Spellman 533 Moorpark Rd #22 Moorpark, CA 93021 Conej o Ready Mix Inc. P.O. Box 488 Moorpark, CA 93021 Dik, Mynnie & Darren Hachiya Seven Atlas Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 H and J Assoc. 2660 Townsgate Rd. Ste. #120 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Peter & Judith Swerling 1136 Corsica Dr. Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 Derek & Carolyn Butler Mitchell Gercy 51 Teardrop Newbury Park, CA 91320 Kenneth & Angela Boyer 844 Cayo Grande Ct. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Haskell Fishell 770 Joyce Dr. Port Hueneme, CA 9304,11 Conlan Family Trust 301 E. Wilbur Rd. Thousand Oaks, CA 9136b Fischer Living Trust 140 S. Martel Los Anoel es . CA 90()36 Seascape Properties Inc. Lyle & Amelia Williams Arthur, Gerald & 4901 Oberland Ave. 553 -40 :Moorpark Rd. Elizabeth Vroman Culver City, CA 90230 Moorpark, CA 93021 552 Moorpark Rd. #86 Moorpark, CA 93021 Arvind Arora Max & Charlene Yeates 541 Moorpark Rd. #30 Anna Casey Ping & Judy Wong Moorpark, CA 93021 61 Moorpark Rd. #44 1982 Chalon St. goorpark, CA 93021 Newbury Park, CA 91320 George & Joanne Rote Randolph Dillon Robin & Vickie Hood Thomas O'Malley 561 Moorpark Rd. #42 546 -90 N. Moorpark Rd. 130 Darlington Dr. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Dana Curts Dave & Zora Kirby John & Janet Fitz erald 541 Moorpark Rd. #32 561 Moorpark Rd. #43 g P.O. Box 1073 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Denice Sandoval Timothy Jones 547 Moorpark Rd. #36 561 N. Moorpark Rd. #41 John A., John R. & Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Richard Malmo 548 Moorpark Rd. #89 Moorpark, CA 93021 Andrew & Gillian Fawthrop Samuel & Patricia Bernstein P.O. Box 7600 1758 Calle Artigas Dennis Voegele Los Angeles, CA 90051 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 207 Red Oak Ave. ATTN: Union Oil Co. Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Katherine Daniells Joseph Russo 547 -35 Moorpark Rd. Phyllis Glover Michael & Terry Webb Moorpark, CA 93021 560 N. Moorpark #82 James & Doris Webb Moorpark, CA 93021 145 Longfellow St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 James & Marianne Frawley Albert &'Joy Silver 9233 National Blvd. 4431 Regents Ct. Michael Oliver Los Angeles, CA 90034 Westlake Village, CA 91361 540 N. Moorpark Rd. Apt. 19t Moorpark, CA 93021 Jesse & Delta Winters Robert Leiser Eugene Boykins 553 Moorpark Rd. #37 3115 Indian Mesa Dr. 540 Moorpark Rd. #96 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360. Moorpark, CA 93021 )ohn & Richard Thorsen Cherie Wrigley Ray & Susan Ann Wilkerson i53 N. Moorpark Rd. #38 330 Windtree to o rpa rk , CA 93021 536 Moorpark Rd. #D- #100 Th ousand Oaks, CA 91320 Moorpark, CA 93021 dwin & Mary Ann Bessert Thomas & Darby Ennis Michael Valentine 363 Sycamor pr 1050 Stuart Cr. 536 Moorpark Rd. #98 irri Vailev, eA 91065 Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Moorpark, CA 93021 $%VUCI L ,.0 1W1111CI Mc "I JVl1 536 Moorpark Rd. #99 Moorpark, CA 93021 Richard & Mari Olsen Marie Ecton 536 Moorpark Rd. #97 Moorpark, CA 93021 Christopher Doherty 532 Moorpark Rd. #101 Moorpark, CA 93021 Benson & Sarah Hyatt Richard & Theresa Hyatt P.O. Box 744 Simi Valley, CA 93065 David & Cheryl Arnold 532 Moorpark Rd. #103 Moorpark, CA 93021 William & Connie Mc Donald 6201 Bee Ave. Agoura, CA 91301 Robert & Marilyn Hunold 17402 Lido Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Douglas & Sandra Aberle 1159 Mellow Ln. Simi Valley, CA 93065 Dennis & Susan Le Vine 144 W. Sidlee St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Lawrence Carpe 565 Moorpark Rd. #48 Moorpark, CA 93021 Charles & Patricia Krumm 3223 Monte Carlo Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Robert Grasham 207 Red Oak Ave. Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Russell & Evelyn Jones 223 Thousand Oaks Blvd. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Denise Gallenstein 577 #54 Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Steve & Florance Chen 577 Moorpark Rd. #55 Moorpark, CA.93021 Shipp Family Trust 1743 N. Marian Ave. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 John & Francis Hobin 1813 Nowak Ave. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Keith & Ellen Feickert 3216 Emera-d Ave. Simi Valley, CA 93063 Karin Russell 581 Moorpark Rd. #59 Moorpark, CA 93021 Joan & Lyn Kukin 590 W. Lynwood St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Gilbert & Duraney Jacobs 2291 Fig St. Simi Valley, CA 93063 Donald Meyers 588 Moorpark Rd. 162 Moorpark, CA 93021 Harry & Gertrude O'Neill #425 Richard Wietsma 670 Tranquil Ln. Simi Valley, CA 93065 Danforth & Dorthiea & Charlene Stevens 6856 Shoup Ave. Canoga Park, CA 91307 Robert & Donna Lutz 1275 Modesto Ave. Camarillo, CA 93010 Ted. Faye & Stephen Clark 1234 Mountain View Dr. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Myrti a Casel ;ai ne 576 Moorpark Rd. #69 Moorpark, CA 93021 John & Jacqualan Magnus 10730 Baton Rouge Northridge, CA 91326 Lyle & Amelia Williams 576 Moorpark Rd. #71 Moorpark, CA 93021 Yancy Iannacone Darrell & Faith Riggs Richard & Deborah G i69 Moorpark Rd. #53 581 N. Moorpark Rd. #57 Garvin loorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 3108 alley, V A Simi Valley, CA 93062 May 30, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) City Engineer memo dated May 23, 1986 - PD -1051 Revised Conditions modified as follows: 4. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing in accordance with the City of Moorpark Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. Sidewalks per plate E -5. b. Driveways shall be per plate E -2 modified to be 50 feet wide with a 15 foot or greater radius curb return. this driveway shall facilitate this development as well as the adjacent development to the south and shall be aligned directly opposite Roberts Avenue. Developer shall remove existing driveway on the southerly development and replace with appropriate curb and gutter if agreement can be reached with this prop- erty woner; driveway curb return shall be constructed so as to provide for handicapped access. C. Signing and stripping plans shall be prepared for Moorpark Road as deemed as appropriate and necessary by the City and CalTrans. d. If any hazardous waste is encountered during any phase of the construction of this project all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, Sherrif's Department and City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not be allowed to proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies through the City Inspector. JAMES D. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tern ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK I TO: Celia FROM: John F. Knipe DATE: May 23, 1986 SUBJECT: PD -1051 Revised City Engineer Conditions STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Per our telephone conversation of May 22, City Engineer condition No. 4 -B is revised to read as follows: Driveways shall be per plate E -2 modified to be 50 -feet wide with a 15 -foot or greater radius curb return. This driveway shall facilitate this development as well as the adjacent development to the south and shall be aligned directly opposite Roberts Avenue. Developer shall remove existing driveway on the southerly development and replace with appropriate curb and gutter; driveway curb return shall be constructed so as to provide for handicapped access if agreement can be reached with adjacent property line. Condition No. 4 -C is hereby added as follows: Signing and stripping plans shall be prepared for Moorpark Road as deemed as appropriate and necessary by the City and CalTrans. If you have any questions, please contact me. ..- RECEIVED -- JFK:sm cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager MAY 281986 R. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer City of Moorpark John Wanger, Project Engineer Mark Wessel, Project Engineer 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805)529-6,864 JAMES D. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tem ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK jjt-e;" //. STAFF REPORT TO: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1Q,51 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Subject: Request for approval of a Residential Development containing 136 residential rental units. Location: The proposed project is located on the east side of Moorpark Road immediately north of "Park Spring ", a 128 unit condominium project. It is approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. Applicant: Lincoln Property Company 4567 Telephone Road, Suite 201, Ventura, CA.93003 GP /Zoning: Residential - Very High /RPD -15 Surrounding Property Zoning /Use: North: 14 -1 /Vacant South: RPD -15 /Condominiums East: M -1 /Developed (Industrial) West: R -1 /Single Family Homes Uses: Environmental: To the north (on Moorpark Road) is both existing and vacant industrial land /buildings. To the south is the existing condominium project. To the east, light industrial. To the west is existing single family dwellings. Mitigated Negative Declaration 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STAFF REPORT: THE PLANNING COMMISSION P. 2 - May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) Discussion IN The proposed project consists of nine 2 -story structures containing both one and two bedroom units. The one and two bedroom units will be combined into (3) typical building types with the nine total structures. There will be 56 one bedroom units and 80 two bedroom units. The one bedroom units are 638 square feet and the two bedroom units are 880 square feet. The architecture is classified as contemporary Early California Monterey style and is detailed with wood trimming, concrete mission tile, wood facial, bronze window frame, horizontal wood siding and stain wood doors. The entire site encompasses 9.14 acres with 50% open -space consisting of landscaping and recreational facilities. There is an existing block wall -along the common boundary line with the condominium project to the south. The proposed conditions require that an 8 foot block wall be constructed between the 8 foot carport walls on the north boundary line so that there will be a continuous 8 foot high wall. separation between this proposed residential project and the industrial facilities. To complete the fencing, a 6 foot block wall will be constructed on the east property line. Site amenities include: a one story recreational building of approximately 2,50C square feet, along with a tennis court, volleyball court, pool, spa and bar -b -ques, plus another bar -b -que area at the eastern end of the project. To the extreme east of the site, the developer has provided a car -wash facility which is an additional amenity for an apartment complex. On April 2, 1986, the Parks & Recreation Commission met and reviewed the proposed project. There recommended conditions on the project are as follows: 1. Increase the size of the pool to approximately 25' x 60'. 2. Increase the size of the spa to comfortably accommodate 12 to 14 people. 3. Increase the deck area around the pool and spa proportionally to the existing deck area to accommodate the increase in the size of the pool and spa. 4. Add a tot lot just north of the open play area between buildings 2 and 3. Tot lot area should encompass 3,000 square feet with 50% of the area dedicated to play equipment to be selected by the developer with staff approval. Tot lot shall be fenced and have adequate security lighting subject to staff approval. 5. Add a half -court basketball court with a concrete surface with location subject to staff approval. -2- STAFF REPORT: THE PLANNING COMMISSION p. 3 - May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD- 1051,(Lincoln Property Company) Discussion (continued) IN 6. Increase the number of bar -b -ques to the following: a. Two gas bar -b -ques shall be provided at the office/ recreation building area around the pool. b. One gas bar -b -que shall be provided near the tot lot with circular concrete picnic table with benches, subject to staff approval. C. One gas bar -b -que pit shall be provided at the east end of the project, complete with a wood trellis cover (gazebo) and concrete benches, subject to staff approval. 7. Amount of open -space to remain at the originally presented design except for the increased size of decking and inclusion of the tot lot. The applicant has agreed to the conditions listed for approval. The original plan for the proposed project was to create a driveway in the middle of the project; however, staff felt it would be more desirable to combine the driveways, less points of conflict. The second set of plans for the proposed project was to combine the driveways opposite Roberts Avenue. In addition, the applicant, Lincoln Properties was going to install a traffic signal at roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road. The adjacent property owner's representatives (Members of the Board), Park Springs Condominium, 128 units, expressed tentative approval with the concept of combined driveway opposite Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road with the traffic signal. The applicant did have a traffic study completed which revealed inadequate warrants for a traffic signal. In other words, the traffic warrants did not justify the install- ation of a signal at Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road. Thereafter, staff met with Park Springs representatives who expressed a concern with joint driveway if a traffic signal was not installed at Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road. Thus, the plans are shown with a driveway opposite Roberts Avenue with a stub at a common property line. In the event, a mutual agreement can be reached with Park Spring Condominium, they can connect with the joint driveway. Analysis of the traffic situation is contained in Lincoln Properties Engineer's Report. Staff comments Staff feels the architectural style - Early California Monterey is detailed to provide an attractive project along Moorpark Road. The separation among the 9 structures also gives the feeling of adequate open- space. In addition, open- space, site amenities and density per acre, all contribute to an overall excellent plan. Lastly, the City is in need of adequate well- designed apartment structures for our citizens. -3- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Companv) i Recommended Action: 1. Find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this body has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder; and 2. Adopt the proposed findings and recommend to the City Council that PD -1051 be approved, subject to the attached conditions. Prepared by: iane Eaton Associate Planner -4- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit' %is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Planning Commission may, at their discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. �. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or of lessee (s) or operator (s) of the subject use, there shall be filed with the Community Development Department the name (s) and address (es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s), or operator(s), together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this permit. 3. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the city because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 4. That permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or operation under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of this permit. 5. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 6. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 7. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of RPD -15 (Residential Planned Development with an allowed density of 15 DU /AC) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 8. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, but any Major Modification to be considered by the City Council. -1- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 9. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit are and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable require- ments and enactments'of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 10. That prior to the issuance of zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect in accordance with ounty Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for approval. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of this permit. Shall be as follows: a. The final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. b. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be of a drought tolerant low -water using variety. C. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. d. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. e. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhear lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. f. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. g. Open Space - Shrubbery along and around the interior walkways shall be low so that visibility is not obstructed. h. That the continued landscape maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City inspector with- in 30 days after notification. - 2 Mav 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITONS: 11. That the final design of site improvements, including materials, colors, and fencing, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 12. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air - conditioning equipment) shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of zone clearance, the final design and location of equipment and screening must be approved by the Planning Commission. 13. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. 14. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection control device shall be installed on the water system in accord- ance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 15. Trash disposal areas shall be provided in locations which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid wall enclosure. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance, the final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 16. That all utilities be underground. 17. That all parking areas and driveways shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, and (or) curbs in parking areas adjacent to landscape areas. 18. That it is the contractor's responsibility to use watering, or other methods as directed by the city to control dust through- out the project. 19. That all windows on the west elevations of buildings facing Moorpark Road, shall be inoperable double sash windows; i.e., two windows separated by a 2.5 - 3 inch airspace. In one pane, 3/16 inch glass, and in the other, 1/8 inch glass should be used. 20. That three - sixteenths (3/16) inch glass or windows, with a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25 or greater; shall be used on buildings which face west onto Moorpark Road. -3- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 21. That all other windows and all other elevations may be standard single strength gXass (SSB) . 22. That no balconies are allowed to face west onto Moorpark Road. 23. That subject to final review by the Park and Recreation Commission the developer shall provide: a. An 2500 square foot recreational structure, located near the west of the project. b. A pool, spa, volleyball court, paddle tennis, and tennis court. C. An additional bar -b -que facility towards the east of the site. d. A car -wash facility along the eastern boundary line of the site. 24. That the developer shall assure adequate provisions to protect the safety of children by fencing and gating pool areas, and safety buffering any tot lots proposed to be located adjacent to a pool area. 25. That the project shall incorporate meandering sidewalks. 26. That storage lockers are to be provided in carports or garages or attached to the exterior of each unit. 27. That the developer shall provide solar heating for all spas. 28. That irrigation shall be regulated so as not to occur at times of high evaporation; i.e., during high winds or extreme high heat. 29 That the developer shall provide low -flush toilets as required by Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code. 30. That the developer shall provide low -flow showers and faucets as required by California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20- 1406F. 31. That the developer shall insulate hot water lines in water recirculating systems as required by the California Energh Commission regulations. 32. Fencing Plan - Prior to issuance of zone clearance the developer shall submit to the city for review and approval by the Director of Community Development a fencing plan indicating a 8 foot block wall to be constructed between the 8 foot carport wall on the north boundary line. In additions, a 6 foot block wall on the east property line shall be constructed. -4- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 34. That prior to construction, zone clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. 35. That prior to issuance of zone clearance, an "Unconditional Will Serve" letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. I. 36. That prior to recordation, the applicant shall pay all fees pursuant to the City of Moorpark Municipal Code, Sections 8279 -4 et seq., for the purpose of providing fees in lieu of land dedication for local park acquisition and /or development of park facilities for the future residents of the subdivision. 4.a. May 14, 1986 CONDITIONS FOR APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Lincoln Property Company May 14, 1986 1. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. 4. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing in accordance with the City of Moorpark Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: a. Sidewalks per plate E -5. b. Driveway shall be per plate E -2 modified to be 50' wide with 10' radius curb returns. This driveway shall facilitate this development as well as the adjacent development to the south and shall be aligned directly opposite Roberts Avenue. Developer shall remove existing driveway on the southerly develop- ment and replace with appropriate curb and gutter; driveway curb returns shall be constructed so as to provide for handicapped access. 5. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right - of -way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 6. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 7. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall deposit with the City of moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. -5- CONDITIONS FOR: APPLICANT: DATE: CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Lincoln Property Company May 14, 1986 8. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No.2372. 9. That prior to zone clearance the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: 10. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 11. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from flooding. 12. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 13. Developer shall construct a bus turnout per Plate D -13 with transition and bus bay lengths each being 60 feet. The transition into the bus bay shall begin at the main driveway end of curb return. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 foots high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. Drive thru security has not been successful for similar construction projects. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) shall be properly secured prior to installation during nonworking hours. All serial numbers shall be recorded for identification purposes. 4. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 5. Condition No. 4 would apply to any construction trailer that would house valuable property and could be utilized on models or at locations where articles of value ( #3) might be kept. 6. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground form tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable or illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage- resistant covers. 7. Lighting plans showing type and location of all lighting devices shall be submitted to the Sheriff's Department for review and approval. 8. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide_ enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly. 9_ All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. 10. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 11. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 12. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. -7- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 13. Each single unit constructed under the same general plan shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct occupancies. 14. Walkways - All walkways will be well lighted and situated so that surrounding residents will have a clear view of all pedestrian travels. 15. Fences - Wrought iron fences to be errected around swimming pool area for safety reasons. Should be 6 feet in height for security. -8- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow, a vehicle waitingf,for entrance to be completely off the public roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing in both directions. the method of gate control shall be subject to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 2. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for the approval of the location of fire hydrants. show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and inservice prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4 inch and two 2 -1/2 inch outlet. ° The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. ° Fire hydrants shall be 24 inch on center, recessed in from the curb face. 4. That the minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building construction, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. 5. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1250 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 6. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 7. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed; prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are set- back more that 150 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure is not visible from the street, the address numbers shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. Individual dwelling units shall have 4 inch numbers. 8. That a plan shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review indicating the method in which buildings are to be identified. -9- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEARTMENT CONDITIONS: 9. That building plans of public assembly areas, which have an occupant load of 50 of more, shall be submitted to the Ventura Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 10. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in apartment buildings according to National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall be subject to the review of the Fire Chief. �1. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in, except when the structure is divided into areas of less than 5,000 square feet with a two hour fire separation wall in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14. —10— May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 VENTURA COUNTY WATER WORKS DISTRICT NO.I (Lincoln Property Company) 1. The applicant shall submit engineering data, satisfactory to the District, that demgnstrates sufficient fireflow is available to all parcels. 2. The applicant shall submit engineering data satisfactory to the district showing that sewers are designed to carry the peak flow rates from all areas tributary to them, including future developed areas. The construction of off -site water and sewer mains may be required to extend to the District's existing trunklines. Note: the District is in the early stages of planning a sewage treatment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of flow into the existing plant is directly related to the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed prior to completion of any plan expansion. This could cause a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant to insure the plan expansion will be complete when sewer service begins. -11- May 14, 1986 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 (Lincoln Property Company) PARKS & RECREATION ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: 1. Increase the size of the pool 2. Increase the size of the spa 14 people. to approximately 25' x 601. to comfortably accommodate 12 to 3. Increase the deck area around the pool and spa proportionally to the existing deck area to accommodate the increase in the size of the pool and spa. 4. Add a tot lot just north of the open play area between buildings 2 and 3. Tot lot area should encompass 3,000 square feet with 50 percent of the area dedicated to play equipment to be selected by the developer with staff approval Tot lot shall be fenced and have adequate security lighting subject to staff approval. 5. Add a half -court basketball court with a concrete surface with location subject to staff approval. 6. Increase the number of barbecues to the following: a. Two gas barbecues shall be provided at the office /recreation building area around the pool. b. One gas barbecue shall be provided near the tot lot with circular concrete picnic table with benches, subject to staff approval. C. One gas barbecue pit shall be provided at the east end of the project, complete with a wood trellis cover (gazebo) and concrete benches, subject to staff approval. 7. Amount of open space to remain at the originally presented design except for the increased size of decking and inclusion of the tot lot. -12- May 14, 1986 MOORPARK JAMES 0. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tern ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember _ LE T A YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MEMORANDUM STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS OELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police TO: Dick Morton, interim Planning Director FROM: R. Der" is Delzeit, City Engineer DATE: April 16, 1986 SUBJECT: PD1051 Traffic Signal Warrant Study CONCLUSION Traffic signals are not warranted at the intersection of Moorpark Road with Roberts Avenue. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PD -1051 is a 136 unit apartment development proposed by Lincoln Property Company. The project location would be east of Moorpark Road opposite Roberts Avenue, and immediately north of an existing 1.28 unit condominium development. The purpose of the subject study was to determine if traffic signals would be warranted if the condominium development and the apartment development shared a common driveway to be aligned opposite Roberts Avenue. STUDY METHODOLOGY Peak hour intersection hand counts and 24 -hour side street machine counts were obtained, and observed volumes were compared with expected volumes derived from trip generation methods. Reliable machine counts were impossible to obtain at the condominium complex driveway due to geometries and motorist driving behavior. After weighing various factors, it was determined that the most valid method of compensating for this lack of data was to utilize modified ITE trip generation rates to estimate the daily traffic volume generated by the condominium development. This volume was 7C-9 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6364 Ok Page -2= then combined with the projected traffic volume associated with PD -1051, and the resulting volume was compared with the traffic signal warrant threshold volumes. This comparison revealed that no traffic signal warrants are satisfied for this location. CALCULATIONS Attached to this report are copies of the field data, calculations, and traffic signal warrants. RDD : MW: jg2 Encl. cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager John Knipe, Assistant Citv Engineer Mark Wessel, Project Engineer John Wanger, Project Engineer Ron Wilson, Lincoln Property Company JN 3776 k AM AM PM PM ADT (in) (out) ( in) (out) Condominiums 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.17 5.2 Balanced ITE Rates Apartments 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 6.6 128 Condominiums 9 44 44 22 666 Expected Volumes 136 Apartments 14 54 54 27 898 128 Condominiums 6 63 65 33 NA Observed Volumes Roberts Avenue 9 50 48 31 853 Based on comparison of expected volumes with observed volumes, with consideration given to relative reliability of daily trip generation rates and peak hour trip generation rates, the condominium ADT trip rate was increased 10 %. 5.2 + 10% = 5.72 ADT /DU 5.72 ADT /DU x 128 DU = 732 ADT for condominiums + 898 ADT for apartments (PD -1051) 1,630 ADT total for combined driveway 1,630/2 = 815 ADT on driveway approach 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12 -:373 Figure 9-1C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic — S•o got* 2) NOTE: 1. Lek turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the lek.turn movement. 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. Major Street: Moorpark Road Minor Street: Driveway opposite Roberts Ave. X Reference Caltrans 7-11-85 Speed Study URBAN__ ..___..____..__..RURALY_C7SM.�i Minimum Requirements EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles per day on major Vehicles perdoyon higher- street(total of both approaches) volume minor - street approach (one direction only) Number of tones for moving traffic on each approach Ur6 n Revd Urban Rural )Actor Street Minor Street 1 ........... .. 1 8,000 600 2,400 1,680 2 or more ........ 1 ................ 9,600121 O0O 6,720 2,400 %S' 1,680 2 or more . ....... 2 or more ........... 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 . ........... _ 2 or more ........... 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher — Satisfied Not Satisfied IX street (total of both volume minor- streetopprooch approaches) (one direction only) Numberof lanes formoving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 ............. 1 ................ 12,000 400 1,200 850 2 or more ........ 1 ................ 14,400 /Zr000T0,080 1,200 $/S 850 2 or more ........ 2 or more ........... 14,400 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 ....... ....... 2 or more ........... 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one wor:ant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more...... 1 2 NOTE: 1. Lek turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the lek.turn movement. 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. Major Street: Moorpark Road Minor Street: Driveway opposite Roberts Ave. X Reference Caltrans 7-11-85 Speed Study INTERSECTION TURNITAC COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH. CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: MOORPARK RD EAST -WEST STREET: ROBERTS AVE /DRVWY TIME: 7:00 -8:00 A DATE: 04 -01 -86 0 ; 609 ; 1 ; Total 122 ; 0 ; 1st 167 0 ; 2nd 156 ; 0 ; 3rd 164 : 1 ; 4th Rt. ; Lt. V Rt.: 6: 9: 6: 4 :: 25: < -- 0: Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt; 7: 12. 12: 7 :; 38; 11 3: 1 4; 3: Lt 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 0 - - -) 26 :: 5: 4: 12: 5: Rt. Lt : Rt 1st : 1 : 150 : 1 2nd 0 : 167 : 2 3rd : 1 : 145 : 0 ; 4th : 2 173 2 . Total 4 : 635 5 INTERSECTION TURNINC COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: MOORPARK RD EAST -WEST STREET: ROBERTS AVE /DRVWY TIME: 8:00 -9:00 A DATE: 04 -01 -86 2 ; 465 ; 2 ; Total 0 1 3 1 ; 0 ; ! s t 1 ; 122 2 ; 2nd 0 ; ! 1 8 ; 0 ; 3 rd 1 ; 44 0 ; 4th Rt ; Lt V Rt.: 2: 4; 2: 3 :: 1:: < -- 0: Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt; 7: 6: 5: 5: 23. : 8.: 2; 5. 0; 1; Lt 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 0: 0: 0 : - - -> 10 :: 4: 3: 0: 3: Rt. Lt : Rt 1st : 3 : 138 : 0 2nd : 0 : 138 : 0 3 rd : 1 : 126 0 : 4 t : 2 91 2 . Total : :------------ 6 : 4 93 : 2 - - - - -. INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES - NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: MOORPARK RD EAST -WEST STREET: ROBERTS AVE /DRVWY TIME: 4:00 -5:00 P DATE: 04 -01 -86 4. 17 ; 588 ; 30 Total 3 150 ; 9 1st 6 ; 136 ; 6 2nd 5 139 : 10 : 3rd 3 ; 163 : 5 ; 4th Rt. ; Lt. V Rt.: 8; 4.' 1; 3 :: 16: < - - -: 2: 0: 2: 011: 4: Total -------------------- 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt.: 8: 2: 3: 0 :; 13: 9:: 2 5: 2; 0: Lt 2nd 3rd 4th ------ Total 2 :: 2: 0: 0: 0 : - - -> 11 :: --------------------- 5: 1: 4: - - 1: Rt. - - -; Lt ; Rt 1st --------------- q : 190 -- : 9 ; 2nd : 9 : 159 6 : 3rd 7 154 : 6 4 t h 7 : 1 7 2 : 12 : Total : • ----------------- 27 675 33 . 4. INTERSECTION TURN I NG COUNT NEWPORT TRA£F 1 C STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA. NORTH -SOUTH STREET: MOORPARK RD EAST -WEST STREET: ROBERTS AVEIDRVWY TIME: 5:00 -6:00 P DATE: 04 -01 -86 4L 99 ; 619 : 26 Total 85 164 ; 9 ; 1st 5 : 168 5 : 2nd 4 ; 164 ; 8 : 3rd 5 123 ; 4 4th Rt ; Lt V Rt.: 8: 5; 8: 3;: 24; < - - -: 0: 0: 2; 1:: 3: Tctal 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt.: 1: 5: 4: 7:: 17; 4. 1; 2: 1; 0: Lt 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 0. - - -> '_0 :: 3; 2: 2; 3: Rt. Lt Rt 1st ; --------------- 4 -- 170 ; 7 ; 2nd : 5 ; 184 13 ; 3rd ; 11 170 13 4 th 12 168 ; 1 1 Total 32 692 44 ; 4L 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA S"REz7- ROEERTS AVE T CCA'= : ON : W/O MOORPARK RD DATE: 2 - 2 0 - 9 6 1 :------------- : --------------- : --------------- : --------------- : _ iME EMS.' WEST : ----- - - - - -- : EOUrlD ; EGUI•iu TOTAL 12:00 '--------------- '--------------- :--------------- ' 1 . 4 / 8 . 12 1:00 •---------------•--------------- '---------- - - - - -• ----------- 1 1 2 . • 2:00 / 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - . Q 1 ? • ? 3:00 :--------------- .--------------- ,--------------- : 1 1 --------------- '--------------- :--------------- : 1 4 4:00 : --------------- ; --------------- ; --------------- ; ------ - - - - -; 22 1' 25 .1 ' 6:0^ 1 1 :------ - - - - -: 50 : 9 : Z9 ; 7:00 --------------- '--------------- '--------------- : ------ - - - - -: 34 : 9 8:00 --------------- '--------------- :--------------- . 1 , 23 1 17 40 ' 9 : :l 0 ' - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 1 1a 1 8 . 27 / 10 :00 ---------------'--------------- ;---------- - - - - -• ------ - - - - -: 19 : 17 : 36 ;- 11 :00 '---------------'--------------- 1 1 '--------------- ; AM :------ - - - - -; 13 ; 18 31 ; 1 1 1 P?-i ; ------ - - - - -: 19 : 18 37 1 :00 --------------- : -------- - - - - -' ' 24 : 25 : 49 : 2:00 '---------------'--------------- 1 1 1 '--------------- : :------ - - - - -: 27 : 22 : 49 ' 3:00 --------------- '--------------- 1 '--------------- : :------ - - - - -: 18 ; 42 4 00 . --------- - - - - -- . --------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -: n n 3-j 4P 78 : ; . --------------- . ----- - - - - -- • 6:00 :---------------.--------------- : ^ 1 ..., --------------- ` a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 7 L ------ - - - - -. 2 s .---------------- 49 . ?` ::00 ---------------.--------------- .---------- - - - - -. 1 2 29 52 8 :00 ;--------------- .--------------- ;--------------- : •------ - - - - - 27 42 9 co --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------- ------------ 14 : :0 „4 io.00 --------- - - - - -- ------------------------------- ----------- 9 ; 8 17 11:00 ---------------- .--------------- .---------------- t. KEW ?ORT :'RAF F : C STU7: ES 15 MINUTE COUNTS STREE .-ROSERTS AVE LOCATION:W /O MOORPARK RD DATE 3 -20 -86 AM PM EAST WEST' TOTAL TIME EAST WEST TOTAL BOUND BOUND BOU14D BOUND 1 4 5 12:00 4 5 ' 0 1 4 4 8 2 2 4 9 4 13 0 2 2 2 5 7 0 0 0 1:00 7 5 12 0 1 1 4 7 11 1 0 1 6 5 11 0 0 0 7 8 15 0 0 0 2:00 3 5 8 0 0 0 8 7 15 0 1 1 7 5 12 0 1 1 9 5 14 0 1 1 3:00 i 1 0 0 0 4 12 16 0 0 0 3 8 11 0 0 0 9 12 21 G 0 0 4:00 15 '_6 31 0 0 0 8 7 1C- 3 1 4 4 6 10 1 0 1 3 19 �2 5 1 6 5:00 7 13 20 8 1 9 6 9 15 5 0 5 5 11 16 4 1 5 8 11 19 7 2 9 6:00 6 15 21 it 4 15 14 19 :7 0 17 6 8 14 15 3 18 9 12 2'- 6 2 8 7 00 6 5 11 2 1 9 g :7 .0 3 :- 6 3 9 9C0 2 7 9 4 13 8 9 17 3 6 9 2 2 4 4 9 3 9 12 4 0 4 9:00 5 6 ii 4 4 8 9 :0 3 2 5 6 - 8 � 10 - 3 6 2 8 10 00 2 .. 3 6 9 3 1 6 15 1 - 3 4 - 3 = 3 2 5 J t 4 7 1 : - c y 9 t 24 HOUR VOLUMES NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES M2+vCORT BEACH, CA STREET: DRIVE E .I10OR ?ARK RD LCCA°'*_O!I: ACROSS :'ROM RODERTS DATE: 3 -24 -86 _ . TILL : EAST : WES7 - ------ - - - - -; SOUND : BOUND : TOTA:- ' :2'00 :--------------- :--------------- .--------------- , 7 8 : 15 ' 1:00 :--------------- :--------------- '--------------- ' . ----- — 1 : 3 4 0n-- :--------------- :--------------- :---------------- 1 7 8 : ' 2:00 --------------- :--------------- :--------------- . ----- - - - - -- : 2 7 4:44 :--------------- :--------------- :--------------- : ' 6 :--------------- :--------------- :--------------- : • 4 25 : 30 : S: ^4 '--------------- '--------------- :--------------- : 92 102 ' 7:00 '--------------- :--------------- :--------------- . ' -; 27 95 : 122 V . :------ - - - - -: 25 : 78 104 ' 9:00 '--------------- '--------------- :--------------- . :------ - - - - -: 18 : 54 72 : io-.00 :---------------:--------------- :---------- - - - - -• : 21 : 25 66 ' : 11:04 :--------------- --------------- .---------- - - - - -. AM ------ - - - - -: 29 52 82 - - - -: 12:00 :--------------- :--------------- :--------------- . PM :------ - - - - -: 44 78 : 122 • 36 55 : 91 ' 2:00 --------------- :--------------- :--------------- : :------ - - - - -: 51 74 121 : : 1.00 :--------------- :--------------- :--------------- : :------ - - - - -: 40 48 : 88 . 4 :^^ :---------------'--------------- '---------- - - - - -• : 8J 74 '_54 `_.Go --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :------ - - - - -. al 87 S� r ^ --------------- : --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - - -: :08 124 -�2-1 • 7 : 0 0 --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------- ----------- 4= : 79 : :22 ' 2 : 0 r. --------------- ' --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - -- 45 47 92 9 c^ .---------------.--------------- .------------- - -• :------ - - - - -. 4: a' : 90 . ------------ :::^^ :--------------- :--------------- 24 :--------------- :--------------- 27 .--------------- 5: .--------------- . :------ - - - - _- nn -. :_________________ __ ____________________________ ------------ ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a NEWPORT TRA: F I C STUDIES 15 MIriUTE COUPITS SiRLai':DRIVE E.1- tOOR?ARK RD DATE 3 -20 -86 LOCA'= ':OI`I: ACROSS FROM ROEERTS PM AM EX 1 TOTAL OVAL .r IME EAS =' WEST TT OTAL BOUND BOUND BOUND SCUND - - - - - 2 3 12:00 io 24 .. 1 �2 14 27 2 2 4 8 21 27 1 1 2 13 19 32 3 3 p 1:00 9 20 29 0 0 q 10 14 0 � p la 1 2 9 10 19 0 2 p 2:00 15 17 '32 0 0 10 20 30 1 5 6 12 18 30 0 0 0 14 15 29 0 2 2 2 3:0C 3 g 1_1 0 13 20 33 1 1 IQ 1 5 6 1 , 0 23 0 0 4:00 .. 13 16 0 73 17 40 0 4 4 la 19 33 0 0 30 22 52 2 2 2 5:00 20 25 46 0 2 23 c1 2 8 10 2 13 ,q 27 5 24 24 44 11 13 11 6:00 31 28 59 0 11 29 33 1 23 24 60 2 2„ 25 .,4 27 �: 7 35 42 yo 74 33 1 19 2C 7:C0 3' 7 23 V `' 19 18 27 c 19 e le 9 7 30 37 8 00 17 8 ,2 1p 22 1 12 15 28 2 21 22 13 18 5 1? 22 12 ?1 7 11 18 °00 13 23 4 16 20 -3 13 S 1 6 1 8 1' 1 6 7 10:00 1 1 i s 2 c 3 4 8 14 22 y 7 8 8 13 9 22 4 8 12. 7 11 i8 :1:00 t y ° 1? '-7 4 6 , 2 19 a :0 14 UrRIAMS EVER AND ASS®CDATES • ('IVII. F :N(;INEFftS • I,ANI) PI.ANNFRS • S01WFYORS • April 14, 1986 Mr. John Luedtke c/o Lincoln Property Company 4567 Telephone Road, Suite 201 Ventura, CA 93003 Subject: Traffic Analysis for The Oaks, PD 71051, Roberts Avenue at Moorpark Road, City of Moorpark Dear Mr. Luedtke, This letter is our evaluation and recommendation of the traffic issues related to the development of your property. It was prepared at your request to help satisfy the City of Moorpark's requirement for an additional analysis of the traffic impacts created by the development of your project. This report is based upon traffic data supplied by the City of Moorpark and an evaluation of your Detailed Site Plan and aerial photograph. EVALUATION . Your project of 136 residential rental units (apartments) is proposed to connect to Moorpark Road opposite the existing Roberts Avenue intersection and is located on the east side of Moorpark Road immediately north of Park Spring, a 128 -unit condominium project. Your site is approximately 720 feet north of New Los Angeles Avenue, and 1,810 feet south of High Street. The aerial photograph shows the condominium project (Park Spring) gains access to Moorpark Road at an offset intersection with Roberts Avenue. To the north of your project is the tee intersection of Flinn Avenue. You propose to combine the Park Spring access with yours to provide a collinear driveway with Roberts Avenue thereby creating a fourway intersection. This realignment of the intersection is similar to the intersection approved by the City of Moorpark for the Kavli property at it's intersection with Condor Drive (near Princeton Avenue) on Los Angeles Avenue at the northeasterly end of the city. The Moorpark City Engineer and the Moorpark Unified School District supplied us with traffic data for the intersection turning movements and the pedestrians at Roberts Avenue, Park Spring driveway and Moorpark Road. To these existing 1881 KNOLL DRIVE. VENTURA. CALIFORNIA 93003 TELEPHONES: 4805► 654 -1088 e • (805) 656-1874 Mr. John Luedtke RE: Traffic Analysis April 14, 1986 Page 2 IN (background) traffic volumes, we added and distributed the trips expected to be generated by your 136 residential- rental units. Our distribution uses the same directional distribution as the Park Spring project. We then made an analysis to determine the need for traffic signals. Using seven seperate procedures established by the State of California, Department of Transportation ( CALTRANS), a traffic signal is not warranted at this intersection. The reason signals are not warranted is that there are not enough vehicles entering the intersection from the side streets, although there are sufficient volumes using the intersection from Moorpark Road. There are also not enough pedestrians using this intersection to satisfy either the minimum pedestrian volume warrant or the school crossing warrant. For example, the school crossing warrant requires 70 students at the peak hour; the maximum number supplied by the Moorpark Unified School District count was 43. Traffic Signal Warrant Number 5 accounts for progressive movement of traffic, and in laymen's terms means if there is a signal within a thousand feet, a traffic signal is not warranted. Since your proposed intersection is approximately 700 feet from the existing signalized intersection of Moorpark Road at New Los Angeles Avenue, that warrant is not satisfied either. In addition, CALTRANS does not allow signals to be installed at intersections in rural areas at spacings closer than one -half mile. Since you are between two existing traffic signals slightly less than one -half mile apart, they will not allow a traffic signal at your driveway. CALTRANS and good traffic engineering practice holds that traffic signals are the last resort. If Moorpark requires a traffic signal at this location, the State would not allow the construction. Moreover, as was found with the Princeton Avenue -Los Angeles Avenue signal, the delay between the actual requirement for the signal and the construction is significant. At that intersection, the signal has been warranted for approximately ten years and paid for since the early 1980's, and yet will not be constructed until late this year or early next. At the same schedule, a signal at your driveway would not be installed until after the freeways are connected (1991 or 1992) and the heavy morning directional traffic problem goes away. The most significant improvement you propose to the intersection of Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road, is the merger of'the Park Springs driveway to create a fourway intersection. Not only will Mr. John Luedtke RE: Traffic Analysis April 14, 1986 Page 3 II this be an aesthetic improvement but it is a major traffic improvement. Our analysis (attached hereto) shows that the existing intersection has 20 points of conflict between vehicles entering the intersection. If your earlier proposal to have a mid -lot entrance for PD -1051 had been allowed to stand, that entrance would have added 8 more points of conflict within 200 feet of Roberts Avenue. Therefore, the creation of the new driveway and the existing intersection would have provided 28 points of conflict within 200 feet on a high speed, heavily traveled roadway. Your proposed intersection, on the other hand, has 16 points of conflict rather than the 28 previously described -- slightly more than half. Thus each reduction in conflict significantly reduces the potential for accidents, and increases the operating capacity of Moorpark Road. It reduces the potential for nearly all types of accidents associated with an intersection. In addition, this work also makes the school crosswalk a safer facility for school age pedestrians. CONCLUSION The analysis described herein shows there is no traffic signal required for the realignment intersection of your driveway at Roberts Avenue. The realignment to a fourway intersection is the most significant benefit you can offer. Your project reduces the number of conflicts along Moorpark Road. RECOMMENDATION It is therefore recommended that you combine the access for Park Springs and your PD -1051 to Moorpark Road so that it is collinear with Roberts Avenue as shown on the Detailed Site Plan. In view of this analysis and these conclusions, a suggested condition is attached to replace City Engineer's Conditions 11 and 12 in the Staff Report. If you have questions or need additional not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, RAMSE ER AND ASSOCIATES Robert E. Warren, P.E. Registered Civil Engineer 19268 Registered Traffic Engineer 358 REW:dh:970 information, please do RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA. CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 m 0, YI Q, cc 0 0 ROBERTS AVENUE p9m%X 7W 1 Ni'i�ti, C Yri •IUI t u JOB SHEET NO. Of CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE _ SCALE MP 4 KAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES JOe Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors / -Y- 1881 Knoll Dr. SHEET NO. OF 2 VENTURA. CALIFORNIA 93003 �tl5x (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 CALCULATED BY GATE CHECKED BY DATE _ 11 W1.11 4k �L �o_�s��LE �fipLoT' P/c; /0.457/ E4/6T/N67 /nJ7EX5EG"T lo^j pAeL-", 5� '91A14 S 4D] KHMJt TtK ANU Abb( tUTA 1 tJ Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA. CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 -M 91411 4k Joe SHEET NO. �'�' / �/ OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY f�,eOf'OS�D DATE City Engineers Condition 11 11. That the driveway for PD -1051 and the Park Springs Condominiums shall be combined and made collinear with Roberts Avenue as shown on the Detailed Site Plan. 4k PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 - (Lincoln Properties) CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 7. That prior to zoge clearance, the developer shall indicate writing to the city'of Moorpark, the disposition of an water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed er Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. y P 8- That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, th the and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil hydrologic, shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark t Engineer; the improvement and shall post sufficient surety o complete construction of the improvements. The drainageyplansaandethe calcu- lations shall indicate the following conditions before development: and after Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water course drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection s stes, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. y ms, 9. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from 1 the flooding. 10. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated wi ing for a- period of one year from the initial enerfizin reef light - street lights. g g of the a signal is warranted at Robert's Avenue and Moorpark R th eloper shall design the signal and shall P oa the insta on of the traffic signal, CalTranspay fo of 1/2, and the Cl 11 pay 1/4 of total co _ pay for 2- That CalTrans shall approve Avenue Moorpark Road i traffic signal at the Robert's building section p to the issuance of a g permit. at the signal shall b occupancy. e applicnat shall a Called prior to �eCg P pay one -half the t with the y i fbea n aid by CalTrans if payment authorize payment is not authorized. by k April 9,1986 JAMES D. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tern ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK a STAFF REPORT TO: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of April 9, 1986 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Subject: Request for approval of a Residential Development containing 136 residential rental units. Location: The proposed project is located on the east side of Moorpark Road immediately north of "Park Spring ", a 128 unit condominium project. It is approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. Applicant: Lincoln Properties 4567 Telephone Road, Suite 201, Ventura, CA.93003 GP /Zoning: Residential - Very High /RPD -15 Surroundinq Property Zoning /Use: North: 14 -1 /Vacant South: RPD -15 /Condominiums East: M -1 /Developed (Industrial) West: R -1 /Single Family Homes Uses: To the north (on Moorpark Road) is both existing and vacant industrial land /buildings. To the south is the existing condominium project. To the east, light industrial. To the west is existing single family dwellings. Environmental: Mitigated Negative Declaration. Issues: A condition of approval is the installation of a "traffic signal ", at the intersection of Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 Discussion: (Lincoln Properties) The proposed project consists of nine 2 story structures containing both one and two bedroom units. Two of the buildings will contain twelve units, while the remaining seven buildings will contain 16 units. There will be 72 one bedroom units and 64 two bedroom units. The one bedroom units are 618 square feet and the two bedroom units are 880 square feet. The architecture is classified as contemporary Early California Monterey style and is detailed with wood trimming, concrete mission tile, wood facial, bronze window frame, horizontal wood siding and stain wood doors. The existing driveway of the condominium project to the south will-be closed and a common driveway opposite Roberts Drive will provide ingress and egress for both projects. Both owners have agreed to this provision. The entire site encompasses 9.14 acres with 50% open space consisting of landscaping and recreational facilities. There is an existing block wall along the common boundary line with the condominium project to the south. The proposed conditions require that an 8 foot block wall be constructed between the 8 foot carport walls on the north boundary line so that there will be a continuous 8 foot separation between this pro- posed residential project and the industrial facilities. To complete the fencing, a 6 foot block wall will be constructed on the east property line. Site amenities include: a one story recreational building of approximately 2500 square feet, along with a tennis court, volleyball court, pool, spa and bar -b -que area plus another bar -b -que area at the eastern end of the project. To the extreme east of the site the develop- er has provided a carwash facility which is an additional amenity for an apartment complex. This car wash is for the use of tenants only. Park and Recreation Comments: This project will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission on April 2, 1986. Their comments will be forwarded to your Commission. Sta f f Comments: This development is well designed with good separation between units and a considerable amount of useable open space, landscaping and recreat- ional facilities. In addition, it will help alleviate an existing traffic problem should the traffic signal be installed. The overall effect will be a benefit to the community. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 - Recommended Action: (Lincoln Properties) 1. Find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that this body has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder; and 2. Adopt the proposed findings and recommend to the City Council that PD -1051 be approved, subject to the attached conditions. Prepared by: Diane Eaton Associate Planner " - U. t3r:t�: —% c Ile I I 'NfitOORPARK Z � • • r I I I z__ T3N I I I - i I t T2N I "%ALLEA TRW? OPN 00 VIRPINIA I � i �cw,ti sr \F* go / 23 CASE rl RO woo ►� I I EVFRFTT cT <� v 1 ST J,• GELES P PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO . PD-1051 < < S1' ' boo too �— (Lincoln Properties) _ -- ►+p� X _ i I I I I WROTH AV I I Z VV �*0 ro AV ASSfM AIOMAA Ay T ?HO or T1 < cc I� + TOWA Ay s CtASUN I — N I 93 ST _ IC > Lu .11 I RESt Z; v_ O 8 s- a° RT y Qi�irox � � < LOS Ar foeANGELES AV -j SN R V I �yG I � goo . .00 I N i LO I , I z J ( 100 X00 _4 I I I Cr I I �t �T W i �\ .`. I l OA T T A o I T I Aa` AF K 80#*T f ( \ \ y a I � C% - t a Tow MT � \� s r " I • Z `� n c I WLL ao I eA LovsA wESTGATC : z =z< City of Planned Development Permit Moorpark No. PD -1051 Applicant: Lincoln Properties April 9, 1986 OORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 30 FLORY AVENUE, MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 TELEPHONE: (805) 529 -1149 April 7, 1986 Ms. Diane Eaton Assistant City Planner City of Moorpark P.O. Box 701 Moorpark, CA 93021 SUBJECT: Bus Turnout - P.D. 1051 Traffic Signal Dear Ms. Eaton: RECEIVED '' APR �t - 1986 um of Moorpark This communication is to request a bus turnout to be located 40 feet north on Moorpark Road, starting from the out driveway on Roberts Avenue. We also wish to request a signal at Roberts Avenue and Moorpark Road. This will assist the guard assigned to students crossing there. Sincerely, Lyle Richardson, Director Maintenance and Operations LR: jz Enclosures - 2 �a CA C �1 � �,irt .`t f I„' �•, "'J r VLF ;4 '� I _� ^� y iY1��' . �4. .', `,r, r V�� ..;�'' ,,�f3':tJt•1�1r'1i is i <Q rn zrn C �7 m --� + M ' R.OAD Cis ClioJ3 �a CA C �1 • l Ica 0 , H 60. DES. r QV • 40' Mr.4. Due _ .. Sd•- Cn.YCRrc't PAD =, 00' - •'t'1l.rl 53J!t. .�: :-� M ::j�•.� �•Tt •'i:.��•�%:'• �.:• • •• • .��••� iO R... .�. -'s"� -+,� � s+t�.;` •. �ili/��Il !;`�L'Y;;�1ify •�^.ti• :� May ��':i�: ;S •i..•��. ..v l,�,�.�y•••�•�7• • �•.,•• . • ! .tt2 SL.7p $jam 140 S4 PARKING ays'AIR RASP .+° r STO P ' s R%-W ►-ti' .may -, `r�.t',� �.�. - ' .. • '°' `' „f X40' nini.-u� for lov speed an' d Iov voh..^e streets ��< �,�. V��.-�,.. .esii'ab3e�°for•�higit�- speed• aad ;,�g� Yoh-:e��treets ,� - - _- �', •- � _ **Por additional pass th.r ou sn bus be-- h add 30 and for each addit +oual layover bus ber-._12 add 80 • . ** Ifl* {- ,� -.*•: for lov speed and Iov vo?ze streets desirable for hi-h speed a=d h{bh vol-.—e streets • FEET FIGURE 3 ,BUS TURNOUT r CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND I. Name of Applicant Lincoln Properties 2. Project Description Construction of an 136 residential _apartment complex. 3. Date of Checklist submittal January 31, 1986 4. Project Location On Moorpark Road approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets 1• EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed'of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO V40010, W100, YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air,emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area? —' 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction ✓ of water movements, in either marine or fresh — waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, ✓ or the rate and amount of surface runoff? — C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in. any water body? — e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including — but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? — g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or —' through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related Ve hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? — 1) YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the,,diversity of species or number of Poe any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, — grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? — C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration — or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? — 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural VOOO resources? — b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an egcplosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO - —1� — %/-- -1�1 *or V000f *00010, */00 Y —V/ YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources !� of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? V/ f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements? ✓ 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view o p en to the or will the proposal result in the creation ofuanlc, aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ' 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity y of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- al sites? — b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known ✓ archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? C. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site near the — vicinity of the project? III. I/ YES MAYBE NO 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of,�the environment, substantially reduce the habitat-of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea.h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. L I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the' environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. That prior'to zone clearance, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall-be the hen current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. J PUBLISH ONE TIME March 26, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 9th day of April , 19 86 , beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark. Avenue, Moorpark, California- 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that, based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore a Negative Declaration has been completed In compliance with State CEQA- Guidelines issued - thereunder. Entitlement: Planned Development Permit No. PD -1051 Applicant: 1,incoln Properties Proposal: Request approval to construct 136 residential apartment units. Location: On Moorpark Road, approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. Assessor's Parcel No.: 512 -0 -150 -205 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Develop. - -Do�atat or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: ( 805) 529-6864. DATED: March 24, 1986 , 19 86 B !cr Title: Planning Secretary Proof of Publication In the matter of: Fictitious Business Name Statement Noy /41117 STATE OF CALIFORNIA! County of Ventura City of Moorpark I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the) County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested in the above - entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a newspaper of general circulation published In the city of Moorpark, County of Ventura, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Ventura, State of C #ifornia, under the date of April 27, 1981. Case dumber SP49674that the notice, of which the an- vexed is a printed copy (set In*type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement i thereof on the following dates, to -wit; J . .� all in the year 19 _ I I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated Moorpark, ifornia, thlsa'�C�d&y of�� -19 I _ I 41gnature MOORPARK NEWS 724D Moorpark Ave. P.O. Box 775 Moorpark, CA 93021 City of IV,0,,rpaa r Tf.ls space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp on HaH of vaid 79 oar> ric heated -it 9, x: , ; #�I A 'vAvwe n& A , for ADO sm i, NOTI( IS TxER alvEl,; So to VW. ducted to d�efaminsb ff do Jed affect the envi!` onment, hwehdmbw I that. based t4p00 .. found that �� it bas been would not t,6 wrath Stafs CEC LA- issued thereunder.= Entitles MAZ. Planned 61 t PnA No. P 10 pnposal• Request to 186..xe�� w apartment uto" north 1's Paro.: `61y1r0� NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If ed he you imi�� mining t. � � Cant. you may those u you ,.0* raised at the public.hear. m8 deaag)ed In this notice, or in written ooa�t�eepondetiice delivered to the Community if �eE� pu'c hp prim �br iu You have anY 4uestiaens or city �►H?tat 4 nia 93021 Ph ((806 By. Mare 24.1986. - - I.aF Fleur TIA>p low GJ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on March 24, 1986 , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF HEARING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 LINCOLN PROPERTIES REQUESTING APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 136 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT UNITS. HEARING DATE by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark , California addressed to Dated: March 24. 19RA � fl, A(- - ; — 1 e" � )- Deputy City Clerk •fur y "s iia 437 Roberts Ave. . w . .,%.� ....1A... t 196 Harry St. �(5 gal., 14-la Kuwe 153 Fraser Ln. Mc•Drpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ventura, CA 93001 Janet Wirth Richard & Alice Mae Hembre Arnaldo & Alma Gonzalez 463 Roberts Ave. 447 Sarah Ave. 428 Sarah Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Donald Smith et al Billy & Dorinda Cooksey Roy & Anna Wells 824 Salem Ave. 435 Sarah St. 448 Sarah Ave. Oxnard, CA 93030 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Neal Elden & Mary Lee Wayman Robert & Delia Perea Ruby Barrett 484 Roberts 423 Sarah Ave. P.O. Box 454 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Wesley & Joan Craig James & Delpha Owen Lauren Mills 1918 Rocky Dells Dr. 411 Sarah St. 492 Sarah St. Prescott, AZ 86301 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Crescencio Sepulveda Catherine Sauk Hortensia Castro 487 Esther Dr. 210 Sierra 493 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ronald & Regina Krepel Randall & Sandra Strong Gilberto & Emma Ramirez 113 Harry St. 298 Harry St. 467 Susan St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Jesus & Refugio Torres Lamberto & Theresa Gonzalez Manuel & Milda Garcia 128 Harry St. 286 Harry St. 447 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ronald & Valinda Greene Manuel & Della Gutierrez Leland & Betty Cotter 146 Harry St. 290 Sierra Ave. Herman & Jo Ann Streiff Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 21021 Devonshire #103 Chatsworth, CA 91311 David & Delonn Arenas Frederick & Michelle Jarvis Daniel & Carol Melson 162 Harry St. 254 Harry St. 428 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Rafael & Eva Fletes Peter & Maxine Delicata David & Bonnie Payte 180 Harry St. 236 Harry St. 448 Susan Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Hobert, Donna & terry Luiz Charles & Lois Boylin Michael & Jill Buckner 527 C Moorpark Rd. 95 E. Ave. de las Flores 502 Moorpark Rd. #125 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Moorpark, CA 93021 Laurie Brunet 28870 Conejo View Dr. Agoura, CA 91301 I Stephen & Gyvette Thomas 526 Moorpark Rd. #108 Moorpark, CA 93021 Albert & Rose Kline 16600 Bosque Dr. Encino, CA 91436 Donald & Lois Hoffman 781 Chestnut St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Arthur & Arlene Dalessandro 31721 Kentfield Ct. Westlake Village, CA 91361 Thomas & Patricia Brancati 3121 Deluna Dr. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 John & Judith Bailey 520 -C Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Edgar, Monika & Ann Coyle 1592 N. Cayton Simi Valley, CA 93065 Heather Mallon 3615 Palmas Ct. Oceanside, CA 92056 Ronald, Virginia & Stacy Sorensen inc� 1.1;1An V. c+ Wayne & Bonnie Guthmiller 516 N. Moorpark Rd. #114 Moorpark, CA 93021 Jill Forman 516 N. Moorpark Rd. #113 Moorpark, CA 93021 John & Debra Dyke 510 Moorpark Rd. #117 Moorpark, CA 93021 Vera Toth & Linda Mrasak 510 Moorpark Rd. #118 Moorpark, CA 93021 Richard Casanova 510 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Terry Van Ballegoijen 6407 Melray St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Marshall & Nancy Davidson 502 Moorpark Rd. #127 Moorpark, CA 93021 Dale & Kathy Norton 2801 Fairbanks Simi Valley, CA 93063 Mary Mc Larnon & Larsen Ragner 971 Westlake Blvd. Ste. B Westlake Village, CA 91361 #119 James & Virginiann Spellman Scott Spellman 533 Moorpark Rd #22 Moorpark, CA 93021 Conejo Ready Mix Inc. P.O. Box 488 Moorpark, CA 93021 Dik, Mynnie & Darren Hachiya Seven Atlas Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 H and J Assoc. 2660 Townsgate Rd. Ste. #120 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Peter & Judith Swerling 1136 Corsica Dr. Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 Derek & Carolyn Butler Mitchell Gercy 51 Teardrop Newbury Park, CA 91320 Kenneth & Angela Boyer 844 Cayo Grande Ct. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Haskell Fishell 770 Joyce Dr. Port Hueneme, CA 9304.1 Conlan Family Trust 301 E. Wilbur Rd. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Fischer Living Trust 140 S. Martel Los Anapi s. rA gnnig rout situ a Vuiizoucsu %su4 ucs " uu41clo w uuuylab a unristine Holmes 468 Susan Ave. 8400 Waters Rd. 316 Hickory Grove _itorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Blanche Shields 494 Susan St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Raymond Caren et al 9735 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills,-CA 90212 Pacific Tel -Tel Co. 140 New Montgomery St. San Francisco, CA 94105 ATTN: Supervisor of Taxes .Ventura County Fl Ctrl Dist. 800 S. Victoria Ave. Ventura, CA 93009 ATTN: R W Agent Moorpark Development 15915 Ventura Blvd. #200 Encino, CA 91436 ATTN: Martin L. Sturman Donald & Virginia Henthorn 605 Laguna Dr. Simi Valley, CA 93065 Gregory & Virginia Mendoza 1821 Thoroughbred Rd. Henderson, NY 89015 Santa Paula Enterprises P.O. Box 3598 Ventura, CA 93006 John Barone Ben & Marianna Dengler P.O. Box 4 ,Newbury Park, CA 91320 John & Cindy Newton 507 -4 Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Morris & Isabelle Paulson 1746 N.*Stanley Ave. Hollywood, CA 90046 Hughes & Westermeyer 507 -3 Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Jane Charnay 507 A Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Gordon Bergelson P.O. Box 1 Canoga Park, CA 91304 Benjamin & Lidia Mauer 39 Sandra Ct. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Lobelia Apartments Limited 77 Rolling Oaks Dr. Ste. 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 ATTN: National Properties Inc. Walter Madrid & Irene VIU l cams 20735 Gbrmain St. Chatsworth, CA 91311 Kenneth & Sharon Scribner Dennis & Diane Hotchkiss 554 Flinn Ave. Frank Major 24537 Dry Cany973S�ld Ck. Rd. Calabasas, CA Richard Watson 517 Moorpark Rd. #11 Moorpark, CA 93021 Robert & Elsina & Sharon Crf 24537 Dry Canyon Cold Ck Rd. Calabasas, CA 91302 George & Iras Lusk 3002 Sandi Dr. Chico, CA 95926 Kelvin & Betty Loh 686 Piropo Ct. Camarillo, CA 93010 Thomas & Elke Trilling 3240 Inglewood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90066 Charles & Sylvia Griswold 1646 La Jolla Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Theodore, Siegfried & Ella Enke 527 -20 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Roger & Margaret Poirier 417 Katherine St. Simi Valley, CA 93063 seascape Properties Inc. Lyle & Amelia Williams Arthur, Gerald & 4901 Overland Ave. 553- 40.Moorpark Rd. Elizabeth Vroman Culver City, CA 90230 Moorpark, CA 93021 552 Moorpark Rd. #86 Moorpark, CA 93021 Arvind Arora 541 Moorpark Rd. #30 Moorpark, CA 93021 George & Joanne Rote Thomas O'Malley 3130 Darlington Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Dana Curts 541 Moorpark Rd. #32 Moorpark, CA 93021 Denice Sandoval 547 Moorpark Rd. #36 Moorpark, CA 93021 Andrew & Gillian Fawthrop P.O. Box 7600 Los Angeles, CA 90051 ATTN: Union Oil Co. Katherine Daniells 547 -35 Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 James & Marianne Frawley 9233 National Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90034 Jesse & Delta Winters 553 Moorpark Rd. #37 Moorpark, CA 93021 John & Richard Thorsen 553 N. Moorpark Rd. #38 Moorpark, CA 93021 Max & Charlene Yeates Anna Casey 561 Moorpark Rd. #44 Moorpark, CA 93021 Randolph Dillon 561 Moorpark Rd. #42 Moorpark, CA 93021 Dave & Zora Kirby 561 Moorpark Rd. #43 Moorpark, CA 93021 Timothy Jones 561 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Ping & Judy Wong 1982 Chalon St. Newbury Park, CA 91320 Robin & Vickie Hood 546 -90 N. Moorpark Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 John & Janet Fitzgerald P.O. Box 1073 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 #41 John A., John R. & Richard Malmo 548 Moorpark Rd. #89 Moorpark, CA 93021 Samuel & Patricia Bernstein 1758 Calla Arti gys Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Joseph Russo Phyllis Glover 560 N. Moorpark #82 Moorpark, CA 93021 Albert &*Joy Silver 4431 Regents Ct. Westlake Village, CA 91361 Robert Leiser 3115 Indian Mesa Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Cherie Wrigley 330 Windtree Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Dennis Voegele 207 Red Oak Ave. Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Michael & Terry Webb James & Doris Webb 145 Longfellow St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Michael Oliver 540 N. Moorpark Rd. Apt. #9� Moorpark, CA 93021 Eugene Boykins 540 Moorpark Rd. #96 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ray & Susan Ann Wilkerson 536 Moorpark Rd. #D - #100 Moorpark, CA 93021 Edwin & Mary Ann Bessert Thomas & Darby Ennis Michael Valentine 1363 Sycamor D6, 1050 Stuart Cr. 536 Moorpark Rd. #98 q;m Vaylev. FA 065 Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Moorpark, CA 93021 536 Moorpark Rd. #99 Moorpark, CA 93021 Richard & Mari Olsen Marie Ecton 536 Moorpark Rd. #97 Moorpark, CA 93021 Christopher Doherty 532 Moorpark Rd. #101 Moorpark, CA 93021 Benson & Sarah Hyatt Richard & Theresa Hyatt P.O. Box 744 Simi Valley, CA 93065 David & Cheryl Arnold 532 Moorpark Rd. #103 Moorpark, CA 93021 William & Connie Mc Donald 6201 Bee Ave. Agoura, CA 91301 Robert & Marilyn Hunold 17402 Lido Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Douglas & Sandra Aberle 1159 Mellow Ln. Simi Valley, CA 93065 Dennis & Susan Le Vine 144 W. Sidlee St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Lawrence Carpe 565 Moorpark Rd. #48 Moorpark, CA 93021 Nancy Iannacone 569 Moorpark Rd. #53 Moorpark, CA 93021 Charles & Patricia Krumm 3223 Monte Carlo Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Robert Grasham 207 Red Oak Ave. Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Joan & Lyn Kukin 590 W. Lynwood St. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Gilbert & Duraney Jacobs 2291 Fig St. Simi Valley, CA 93063 Donald Meyers 588 Moorpark Rd. #62 Moorpark, CA 93021 Russell & Evelyn Jones Harry & Gertrude O'Neill 223 Thousand Oaks Blvd. #425 Richard Wietsma Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 670 Tranquil Ln. Simi Valley, CA 93065 Denise Gallenstein Danforth & Dorthiea & 577 #54 Moorpark Rd. Charlene Stevens Moorpark, CA 93021 6856 Shoup Ave. Canoga Park, CA 91307 Steve & Florance Chen Robert & Donna Lutz 577 Moorpark Rd. #55 1275 Modesto Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Camarillo, CA 93010 Shipp Family Trust Ted, Faye & Stephen Clark 1743 N. Marian Ave. 1234 Mountain View Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Newbury Park, CA 91320 John & Francis Hobin Myrtie Caseli%ne 1813 Nowak Ave. 576 Moorpark Rd. #69 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Moorpark, CA 93021 Keith & Ellen Feickert John & Jacqualan Magnusson 3216 Emera-d Ave. 10730 Baton Rouge Simi Valley, CA 93063 Northridge, CA 91326 Karin Russell Lyle & Amelia Williams 581 Moorpark Rd. #59 576 Moorpark Rd. #71 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark, CA 93021 Darrell & Faith Riggs Richard & Deborah Garvin 581 N. Moorpark Rd. #57 3108 Dalhart St. Moorpark, CA 93021 Simi Valley, CA 93062 nldu5 a UC9'Ud NCbVC11UU1 y Herbert & Renate Straus 5.55 Hollybucoe_Lo. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 William & Joan Shelly et al 26022- D.Alizia Canyon Calabasas, CA 91302 0 Rogelic & Toni Rodriguez Fidel & Mary Barcenas 568 Moorpark Rd. #75 Moorpark, CA 93021 Ronald Cisneros 20355 Sherman Way #242 Canoga Park, CA 91306 Byron, Eleanor & Barry Disselhorst 4376 Mill Valley Rd. Moorpark, CA 93021 Michael Chulak & Sidney Brody 272 Cedar Heights Dr. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Estrella Velilla 4026 Calle Mira Monte Newbury Park, CA 91320 Judith Ballback 564 Moorpark #80 Moorpark, CA 93021 CC &F 23 Properties Inc. 911 Wilshire Blvd. #1010 Los Angeles, CA 90017 SWS Assoc. 10920 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 A TTA1 . 1 U^ NM4 0- cen NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: Planned Development Permit No. PD -1051 Applicants Name: Lincoln Properties Parcel Size: 9.14 Acres Assessors Parcel No. (s) 512 -0 -15.0 -435; 512 -0 -150 -205 Zoning Designation: General Plan Designation: "RPD -15U" Residential Planned Development Project Location: On Moorpark Road, approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles. Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: Construction of 168 residential apartment units. The public review period for the draft Negative Declaration is from February 11th to February 25,1986 I you have any questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of the draft Negative Declaration, please call or write, Diane Eaton, Associate Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 93021, (805) 529 -6864. Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address. Prepared by: Diane Eaton Date: 2/11/86 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) it CELIA LaFLEUR Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on February 11, 1986 . , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -1051 LINCOLN PROPERTIES REQUESTING APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 168 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT UNITS. by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at MOORPARK California addressed to SEE ATTACHED LIST Dated: February 11, 1986 Deputy City Clerk CITY OF MOORPARK DEPAR`TMEN'T` OF CCMHUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIMRNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:', 1. Entitlement; Planned Development Permit No. PD -1051 2. Applicant; Lincoln Properties 3. Proposal; To construct a 168 residential apartment units. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Moorpark Road approximately 500 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue. 5. Responsible Agencies: Cal Trans I I . STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, FINDINGS: _An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been det rmined e that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) That prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the developer shall -participate, by depositing funds with the City of Moorpark, a contribution for the Los Angeles Area of Contribution-applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2- Document Posting Period; February 11, 19 8 6 thru February 25, 19 8 6 Prepared by: Dian Eaton (Name) 2/11/86 (Date) Approved by: ( Name ) (Date)