HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1986 0915 CC REG ITEM 07BTHOMAS C. FERGUSON
Mayor
DANNY A. WOOLARD
Mayor Pro Tern
JAMES A. HARTLEY
Councilmember
ALBERT PRIETO
Councilmember
LETA YANCY - SUTTON
Councilmember
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
TO =
FROM =
DATE _
R E _
MOORPARK
MEMORANDUM
The Honorable City Council --�
Diane Eaton, Associate Planner
TEM ^7 -IS
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
RICHARD MORTON
Director of
Community
Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
September 10, 1986 (City Council Meeting of 9/15/86)
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & DP- 349 -353)
(Annotti Associates)
Proposal
Request approval for Development Plan to construct 15
Industrial facilities which encompasses 9.52 acres -
15 structures ranging from 5,000 - 30,701 square feet.
Background
On July 23, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed the
proposed project. Following staff presentation, the
Commission took action to approve LDM -8 which subdivided
the 9.52 acre site into 15 separate lots of record with
recommended conditions of approval. In addition the
Commission recommended approval of DP- 338 -347; and
DP- 349 -353 with the attached conditions.
Recommend Action
Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving DP338 -347;
and DP- 349 -353 subject to the recommended conditions
for consideration by the City Council at its next regular
meeting.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
=TEM 7 _B_
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on
Tuesday , the 2 of September 1986, beginning at the hour of 7:00
p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located
at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021, for the purpose
of consideration of the proposed project herein below described.
notice is hereby further given that, pursuant to california State Law,
an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project
would significantly effect the environment, and that, based upon an
initial review, it has been found that a significant effect would occur;
therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incomp-
liance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder.
Entitlement: Development Plan Permit Nos.:
DP -338
- 10,400
sq.ft.
DP -345 -
5,000
sq.ft-
DP-339
- 12,240
sq.ft.
DP -346
- 5,000
sq.ft.
DP -340
- 12,240
sq.ft.
DP -347
- 5,246
sq.ft.
DP -341 -
10,614
sq.ft.
DP -349 -
5,246
sq.ft.
DP -342
- 10,614
sq.ft.
DP -350
- 15,372
sq.ft-
DP-343
- 12,240
sq.ft_
DP -351 -
30,701
sq.ft.
DP -344
- 10,800
sq.ft.
DP -352
- 30,701
sq.ft.
DP -353
- 14,635
sq.ft.
Applicant: Annotti Associates
Proposal: To construct industrial /manufacturing buildings as
listed in the above entitlement.
Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta
Avenue_
Assessor Parcel No.: 511 -07 -42
AT (1'T T (` F
NT ()'P T C T?
T\T C) rP T (` F
If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the Department of Community Development at or prior to the public
hearing.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact
the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone (805) 529 -6864.
Dated: June 23, 1986 I
By:
Title: dministrative Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
TO THE MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DEVELOP-
MENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & DP- 349 -353, ON
THE APPLICATION OF MARK ANNOTTI. ASSESSOR PARCEL
NO. 511- 07 -42.
WHEREAS, at a duly notice public hearing on July 9, 1986
and July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the
application filed by Mark Annotti requesting approval of Development
Plan Nos. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 to construct 15 industrial facilities
which encompasses 9.52 acres, the 15 structures ranging form 5,000 to
30,701 square feet. Project description as follows:
Project Description:
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the ,property
into 15 separate lots. The existing site now contains
9.52 acres. In addition, he is requesting 15 indust-
rial facilities to be constructed on the site.
BLDG. SIZE
LOT SIZE SQUARE FEET
23,030
10,400
20,756
12,400
20,755
12,400
20,755
10,614
20,756
10,614
20,756
12,240
20,755
10,800
14,375
5,000
14,375
5,000
10,730
5,246
10,730
5,246
26,738
15,372
50,662
30,701
47,782
30,701
35,000
14,635
NO. OF PARKING
SPACES PROVIDED
25
26
21
21
26
26
21
14
14
13
13
35
70
54
36
The reason for the variation in parking ratio is because
a portion of the buildings have a greater percentage of
office which requires more parking. The developer has
provided adequate spaces to meet tfie parking requirements
under both office and industrial development standards.
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Planning Commission, after review
and consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have
a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its
decision in the matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff re-
port is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein
with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby approved;
SECTION 2. That at its meeting of July 23, 1986, the
Moorpark Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare
a Resolution recommending approval with the modified attached con-
ditions for Development Plan Permit No. DP 338 -347: 349 -353; said
Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next
regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction
was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner
Keenan;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
Claffey, Holland, LaPerch and
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 of August, 1986
Chairman
ATTEST:
Acting Secretary
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 1 of- lo
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot
plan(s) and eleveations labeled Exhibits "3" & "4" except or
unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design
of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot
plans and elevations.
2. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations
of the M -1 (Light Industrial) :Zone and all agencies of the State
of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other
governmental entities.
3. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year
after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically
expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may;
at his. discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for
use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent
areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration
of use during the initial one year period.
4. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community
Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application,
but any Major Modification is to be considered by the City Planning
Commission.
5. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy of this building
by any tenant, either the owner or prospective tenant shall file
a modificaiton application for this permit. The purpose of the
modification shall determine if the proposed use is compatible
with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of this permit.
Also that staff shall review proposed occupancy to determine
if the request will be a Minor or Major Modification.
6. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area
and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements
and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City Authorities,
and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference
become conditions of this permit.
7. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as
permitting or requiring any violation --of law, or any unlawful
rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental
agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply,
the stricter ones shall take precedence.
8- That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development
plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate
any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
phb'Shb , APPROVED A14D cA.uOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC-86-103
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
UATr; :
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
8/13/86
p. 2 of 10
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
9. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained
from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained
from the Building and Safety Division.
10. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping
and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and
maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape
Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape
Plan Check, shall be submittted to the Director of Community
Development and the Planning Commission for review and approval.
the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of
final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting
plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark.
All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved
prior to the inauguration of use of this permit.
11. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade,
coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described
as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen
tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided
to the curb.
12. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be
drought tolerant, low -water using variety.
13. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window.
14. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within
the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated
driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian.
15. Landscaping (trees) shall not be places directly under any overhead
lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level.
16. That the final design of site improvements, including materials
and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission.
17. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air -cond-
itioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall
be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing.
Said screening material shall be of similar material used in
the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance
of a zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof
mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the City
Planning Commission.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
DP -33u -347 & 349 -353 p. 3 of 10
Mark Annotti --
July 23, 1986
18. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which
will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the
building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid
fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall
be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development.
19. That all utilities shall be underground.
20. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and
shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and
appropriate wheel blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas.
21. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code,
Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required.
22. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch)
exten >ion of the parapet wall above the highest point of the
roof_
23. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property
owner or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject use, ther
shall be filed with the Director of Community Development
the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s)
or operators(s), together with a letter form any such person(s),
acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this
permit.
24. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use
of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought
against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit
or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee
will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City
may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action.
The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense
of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve
permittee of his obligation under this condition.
25. That permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or operation
under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee
of all conditions of this permit.
26. That disposal of all potential hazardous wastes shall be
by a means approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health
Division, and to include State and Federal agencies.
27. Prior to occupancy by tenant or subsequent owner that would
employ or dispose of toxic or hazardous waste a Major Modification
shall be processed and filed.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. YC -86 -103
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
8/13/86
p. 4 of 10
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
28. That prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any or all
uses, the applicant must obtain approval from the Ventura
County Environmental Health Department.
29. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection
control devise shall be installed on the water system in
accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental
Health Department.
30. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities
shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee
shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as
indicated by the City Inspector within thirty (30) days after
notification.
31. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional"
Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained
from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 5 of 10
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer;
shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post
sufficient surety guaranteeing completion.
2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered
professional Civil Engineer in the State of California.
The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations
of the approved Soils Report.
3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall
post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing,
and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road
Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as
follows:
- All driveways to be 25' wide with 10' radius curb
returns per plate E -2-
4_ That prior to any work being conducted within the State
or City right -of -way, the developer shall obtain an
Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency.
5_ That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate
feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency
storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
6. That prior to zone clearance, the d (4�eloper shall indicate in
writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition on any water
well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site.
If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are
abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be
destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353
APPLICANT: Mark Annotti
DATE: July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and
approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and
hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with
the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement
and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improvements. The drainage
plans and calculations shall indicate the
following conditions before and after development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water
courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions,
collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and
drainage courses.
8/13/86
P. 6 of -10
8. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street
lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing
of the street lights.
9. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the
construction of this project, all work shall be
immediately stopped and the Ventura County
Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department,
the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall
be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until
clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
10. Developer shall obtain reciprocating access and
drainage easements, as well as offsite construction
permission, from all adjacent properties sharing
a common driveway or paking lot. .
Development Plan Permit No. DP -339
1. Developer shall place a permanent barrier for termination of
road improvements at east side of property on Lassen Avenue.
-PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
i
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPT.TCANT
Litt l E
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 7 of 10
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF "S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction
phase, or a 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around
the construction site.
2. construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured
during nonworking hours.
3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior
doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings
where access may be made.
4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone
10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped
with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed
so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the
closed or locked position.
11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area,
i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall
be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the
parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and
shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent
properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected
by weather and breakage- resistant covers.
5.
Front door entrances shall be visible from the street.
'. 6.
All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in
width with radius curb returns.
7.
Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide
enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly.
8.
All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum
of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. Entrance
glass doors are acceptable.
9.
Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five pintumbler
operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving
guide a minimum of 1 inch.
10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped
with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed
so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the
closed or locked position.
11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area,
i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
'PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 8 of 10
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. That access roads shall be installed with an all - weather surface,
suitable for access by fire department apparatus.
2. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 -feet
6- inches (13'6 ").
3. That approved turn - around areas for fire apparatus shall be pro-
vided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main
thoroughfare.
4. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow
a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the public
roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing
in both directions. The method of gate control shall be subject
to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention.
5. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be
submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy.
7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to
the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the
location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within
300 feet of the development.
8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to
combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards
of the County Water Works Manual.
° Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and
shall have 1 four inch and 2 two an one -half inch
outlet(s).
The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less
than 20 psi residual pressure.
° Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and
so located that no structure..will be farther than 150
feet from any one hydrant.
° Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face
24 inches at center.
'PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
8/13/86
p-_9 -o f 10
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of
building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls,
and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O
Guide for 'Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans
and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2750
gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water
purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project.
10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1500 gallons per minute
shall be provided at this location.
11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared
for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the
Ventura county Weed Abatement Ordinance.
12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be
installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to
the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where
structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger
numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the
street. In the event a structure(s) shall be posted adjacent to
the driveway entrance.
13. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
14. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with
National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The place-
ment of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention
Bureau.
I.S. That if any buildings are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler
system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check,
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
16. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguisher
system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure
proper installation.
17. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for
approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention.
18. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or
5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic
( fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance
No. 14.
P ASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPT.TC ANT -
/ UA'1'r. :
I
DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 P. 10 01.10
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO.! CONDITIONS
1. That the applicant shall be required to submit engineering data,
satisfactory to the District, that demonstrates sufficient
fireflow is available to all parcels.
2. That the construction of off -site water and sewer mains may
be required to extend to the District's existing trucklines.
3. The district is in the early stages of planning a sewage treat-
ment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of
flow into the existing treatment plant is directly related to
the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are
made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed
prior to completion of any plant expansion. This could cause
a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant
to insure the plant expansion will be complete when sewer service
begins.
4. That no new sewer main or lateral improvements shall be construct-
ed deeper than 15 -feet.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, CELIA LaFLEUR, Secretary
the City of Moorpark, California,-do
going Resolution No. PC -86 -103 was
Commission of said City at a meeting
of August , 1986, and that the
roll call vote, to wit:
of the Planning Commission of
hereby certify that the fore -
adopted by the Moorpark Planning
thereof held on the 13 day
same was adopted by the following
AYES: Commissioner Douglas Holland, Jim Keenan,
William LaPerch, Daniel Claffey;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Jeffrey Rosen.
Witness my hand this 15
Secretary
day of August , 1986
01/86
RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LAND DIVISION ( MOORPARK) PERMIT NO. LDM -8 ON THE
APPLICATION OF MARK ANNOTTI. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.
511- 07 -42.
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 9, 1986,
and July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the
application filed by Mark Annotti-requesting approval a Land Division
under the tentative Parcel Map No. PM -4204 to subdivide the 9.52 acres
into 15 separate lots of record. Located on Goldman Avenue between
Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Planning Commission, after review and
consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant
effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff report
dated July 23, 1986, which report is incorporated by reference as though
fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission,
are hereby approved;
SECTION 2. That at its meeting of July 23, 1986, the
Moorpark Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a
Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions,as modified, does
hereby approve Land Division (Moorpark) Permit No. LDM -8; said Resolution
to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled
meeting. The action with foregoing direction was approved by the follow-
ing roll call vote;
AYES: Commissioner Keenan, Claffey, LaPerch, Holland;
NOES: None;
ABSTAIN: None;
ABSENT: None.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED th.js 13 day of August, 1986.
7
ATTEST:
Orman
Acting Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, CELIA LaFLEUR, Secretary
the City of Moorpark, California; do
going Resolution No. PC -86 -104 was
Commission of said City at a meeting
of August , 1986, and that the
roll call vote, to wit:
of the Planning Commission of
hereby certify that the fore -
adopted by the Moorpark Planning
thereof held on the 13 day
same was adopted by the following
AYES: Commissioner Douglas Holland, Jim Keenan,
William LaPerch, Daniel Claffey;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Jeffrey Rosen.
Witness my hand this 15
Secretary
day of August , 1986
ol/86
l
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 1 of 8
APPLICANT: Mark Annotti
DATE: July 23, 1986
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8
1. That the conditions of approval of this parcel map supersede
all conflicting notation,.-specifications, dimensions, typical
sections and the like which may be shown on said map and that
all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of
Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply.
2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura
County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity
shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall,
by reference, become conditions of this entitlement.
3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as
permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules
or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency.
In instances where more than on set of rules apply, the strict;r
ones shall take precedence.
4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement
are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any
of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
5. That applicant agrees as a conditions of issuance (or renewal)
and use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action
brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of
this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit.
Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or
attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to
pay as a result of any such action City may, at its sole dis-
cretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation
under this condition.
6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be
acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this map.
7. As of the date of recordation of final (parcel) map, the lots
depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning
ordinances and General Plan then applicable to the property.
Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the
zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date
the tentative map is conditionally approved. Conditional approval
of th tentative map shall neither limit the power of the
legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or
general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such
amendments.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
l
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 2_ of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8
8. That at the time water service connection is made, cross
connection control devices shall be installed on the water
system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County
Division of Environmental Health.
9. Prior to recording of the parcel map, the Developer shall obtain
a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal Water District
indicating payment of District's Capital Construction charges.
10. Prior to recordation, a "Unconditional Availability" letter for
water and sewer sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura
County Waterworks District No. 1.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 3 of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8
1. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the
City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared
by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit;
and shall post-sufficient surety guaranteeing completion.
2. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the
City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report
certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State
of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendat-
ions of the approved Soils Report.
3. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City
of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an
agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, stripping and signing, and paving in accordance with
the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard
Plates are as follows:
° Tejeda Street, "B" Street, and "C" Street shall be con-
structed per plate B -3D, with "B" Street being constructed
with fill street improvements east of the centerline and
12' of paving west of the centerline.
° All knuckles shall be constructed pi
° Cul -de -sac at the end of "C" Street
C -3.
° All streets shall have a minimum of
4. That in conjunction with the recordation
the developer shall offer to dedicate on
the City of Moorpark for public use, all
right of way shown on the (Parcel) Map.
E!r plate C-4.
shall be per plate
4" of asphalt.
of the (Parcel) Map,
the (Parcel) Map to
the public streets
5. That prior to any work being conduced within the State or
City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment
Permit from the appropriate Agency.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
( DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 4 of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8
6. That prior to recodation, the developer shall demonstrate
feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency
storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
7. That prior to recordation, the developer shall deposit with
the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue
Improvement Area of Contribution.
The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles
Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at
the time the Building Permit is issued.
8. That in conjunction with recodation, the developer shall
offer to dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark,
a Public Service Easement as required.
9. That prior to recordation, the developer shall indicate in
writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water
well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site.
If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are
abandoned and have not been.properly sealed, they must be
destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372.
If any of the improvements which the subdivider is required
to construct or install is to be constructed or installed
upon land in which the subdivider does not have title or
interest sufficient for such purposes, the subdivider shall
do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing
of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Government
Code Section 66457.
a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter "City ") in writing
that the subdivider wishes the City to acquire an interest
in the land which is sufficient for such purposes as
provided in Government Code Section 66462.5;
b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the
interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the
interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements
of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared
by a appraiser approved by the City which expresses
and opinion as to the current fair market value of the
interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation
Guarantee Report;
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 5 of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
9. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such
cash deposits or other security as the City may require,
pursuant to which the subdivider will pay all of the
City's cost (including,.without limitation, attorney's
fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest
in the land.
10. There is some concern as to the adequacy of the size of the
existing storm drain facility to which the storm drain facilities
of this project will connect. There currently exists a retention
basin on site which retains storm water from both on -site
and off -site. Storm drain facilities shall be sized to handle
all on -site and off -site storm water flows, including the
existing water flows from Goldman Avenue, Tejeda Street,
Tech Circle, and all of the property directly to the west
to their final point of discharge. Therefore, prior to recordation,
the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calcu-
lations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter
into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the
improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing
the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans
and calculations shall indicate the following conditions
before and after development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses,
drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems,
flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses.
11. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to
City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all
the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected
from flooding.
12. Prior to the recordation the developer shall pay all energy
costs associated with street lighting for a period of one
year from the initial energizing of,the street lights.
13. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and
approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion
control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall
be required within 60 days of completion of grading.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 6 of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204
14. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage
easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance
shall be provided to the City that these easements will be
adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey
storm water flows.
15. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction
of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and
the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire
Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector
shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until
clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
16. A study of traffic concerns conducted by the Developer's
Engineer and the City Engineer indicate that a traffic signal
will eventually be warranted at either intersection of Los
Angeles Avenue with Maureen Lane or goldman Avenue. Because
Maureen Lane is a four - legged intersection, the City Engineer
has determined that it is the more appropriate location for
the signal. However, the signalization of either intersection
will necessitate the construction of a street connecting
Maureen Lane with "B" Street. Therefore, prior to recordation,
Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, street improvement plans for a street connecting
"B" Street with Maureen Lane, prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer and shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Moorpark to complete the improvements.
The developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improvements. Said improvements shall
be required to be constructed along with or prior to construction
of the signal. Subject to City council approval the developer
of LDM -8 may be relieved of this condition if, prior to completion
of the signal at Maureen Lane and Los Angeles Avenue, a different
developer has been conditioned and approved by the City Council
to construct these improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving
in accordance with the Ventura County 'Road Standards. The
street shall be constructed per plate B -3D, modified such
that full street improvements be constructed north of the
centerline along with 12' of paving south of the centerline.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 7_of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
17. During construction of this project, the developer shall take
all necessary action to guarantee that dust control shall
be maintained so that dust from the project site shall not
bother the homes adjacent to this project.
18. That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall
dedicate on the Parcel Map:to the City of Moorpark the access
rights to Lassen Avenue. Said dedication shall restrict
both ingress and egress onto Lassen Avenue from this project,
easterly from the subject property, toward Shasta Avenue.
19. Within two years of the recordation of the final map, the
developer shall acquire, dedicate, improve, and construct
the full street improvements for the connector road between
the subdivision and Maureen Lane. In order to secure the
acquisition, dedication, construction, and improvement of
these improvements, the developer shall agree to cooperate,
upon notice by the City with other property owners, the City,
and other public agencies to provide the improvements as
set forth above. In this regard, the developer shall not
protest or contest any assessment district or any other financing
technique which may be formed or utilized in order to provide
such public improvements. The developer shall provide appropriate
security guaranteeing all of his obligations under this condition.
'PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 8 of 8
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8
1. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access
road /driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department
vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions
to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to
recordation.
2. That the access road shall be certified by a registered
Civil Engineer as having an lall- weather surface in conformation
with Public Works Standards. This certification shall be submitted
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention prior to occupancy.
3• That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a
40 foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road.
4. That approved turn - around areas or easements for fire apparatus
shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther
from the main thoroughfare.
5. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13
feet 6 inches (13'6 ") .
6• That the private road shall be named if serving more than five
(5) parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire
Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior
to recordation.
7. That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with
the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance
with Plate F -4 of Ventura County Road Standards.
8. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District,
water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM @ 20 psi
shall be installed from the public right -of -way, or from the
purveyor point of connection to the southwest corner of the south
property line of parcel #5 and the southwest corner of parcel #1.
the cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these
mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map).
This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation
shall be completed prior to recordation
9• That prior to recordation, the applicant shall provide to the
fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the
purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF Moorpark )
I, CELIA LaFLEUR
Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on August 18, 1986
, I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 RE: DEVELOPMENT
PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 15 INDUST
RIAL FACILITIES RANGING FROM 5,000 sq. ft. to 30,000 sq.ft.
by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark
California addressed to SEE ATTACHED LIST
Dated: August 18, 1986
Deputy City Clerk
i
- Leslies pool Mart, Inc.
Mallery Dale, C- Shirley C. 20222 Plummer Street.
336 Shasta Avenue. Chatsworht, Calif. 91311
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 015
Seely Bernard, J- Barbara A.
337 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 025
;1unez Ramiro, G -Lucy S.
550 Los Angeles Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 015
Jaegge Robin. P- Cathie
L. Stenzel, David M- Yvonne.
287 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 025
Barnett Kathyrn J.
5584 Birch View Lane.
Camarillo, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 035
Pratti Thomas, S -liary E.
237 Shasta Street.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 page 07 Parcel 09 t
Spencer Family Trust
784 Poindexter Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021 l
i
Book 511 Page 077 Parcel 23
Country Properties L.T.D PH -III
Kimmel Jerome -Bryna
8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road.
,yoorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 32
Mann Family Trust.
9650 Calvin Ave.
Northridge, Calif. 91324
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 33
Elmore Parke -June.
30756 Passageway Place.
Agoura, Calif. 91301
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 36
Kimmel Jerome - Bryna.
8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 42
White Ward H. -
Moorpark, Properties -
141 Dusenberg Drive. STE. 10
Westlake Village, Calif. 91362
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 43
Mundee Harvey K.
P.O.Box 2488
Paso Robles, Calif. 93446
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 45
Moorparkc, Stow -It Properties
ATTN: Howard L. Hughes
9665 Wilshire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, Calif. 90212
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 46
City Of Moorpark.
P.O. Box 701
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Claffey Daniel, P- Rozilina
730 Sierra Ave
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 page 141 Parcel 0�
Flores Eduardo, L -Lilia
750 Sierra Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 141 Parcel 09
Ruiz Richard,Gr- celda,
90 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 01
Barnett Robert, I -Joyce F.
163 Whitney Ave,
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 02
Baker Curtis, D- Charlotte
162 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book.511 Page 145 Parcel 01
Hallan Eugene, G- Beverly A.
163 Shasta ave.
o�rpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 02
Sustaita Evelmen, L -Edith L.
412 S. Havenside
Newbury Park, Calif. 91320
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 03
Lee Herbert, P- Patricia A.
113 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 04
Corralejo = George
1577 N. Dara
Camarillo, Calif. 93010
I
r
711 PALER AVE.
MOORPARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 124 Parcel 065
wSCNG M'1:1 ��
B -%OSA M
731 PALCtV�R AVE
MOORPARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 124 Parcel 075
E -DEXPM J-
730 DIAEW
MOORPARK, CAL. 93021
Boobs 511 Page 122 Parcel 115
MASCN —JOHN T,
MASON Sja LIAm E - PmL
413 SHASTA AVE
MOORPARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 325
OiNCOZIN Jag
-
V JR r„ COW=
387 SH}CSTA AVE,
MDORPARK CAL 93021
Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 135
GRINDER DGtzkm
i Ir MARY A
363 SHASTA AVE
MOORPARK CAL, 93021
L -
Boric 511 Page 134 Parcel 015
PALP1Eft STANI.�Y 1
LWISE D
IV�13021 1
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 035
RO DCSCN STfFMN r
L- CARIA
291 WHrINEY AVE
HMRpA;a<, CAL. 93021 r
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 055
Vn I.ANUEVA F40Y t
M-NORA G
251 Pffil:My AVE.
MOORPARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 075
FORD PATRICK
H- NARY E
211 1dirn -EY AVE.
1MRPARK, CAL. 93021
168 Shasta Avenue.
213 Shasta Avenue.
mooroark, Calif. 93021
i
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
105 1
Higginbotham Ronald, E- Sharon.
210 Shasta Avenue.
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Hubbard Mario, Buena M.
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
115
Franco Arthur, Vera.
5154 Goldman Ave.
230 Shasta Street.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
t
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
125
Magill Charles N.
9010 Corbin Ave. Ste. 112
250 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
92 Fleet Street.
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
135
Valdez David Abraham,
DH
Leticia Borboa.
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
270 Shasta Avenue.
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 025
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
i
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
145
Valenza Samuel, Myrna Trust
290 Shasta Avenue.
4 512 Falkirk Ave,
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
W -DORIS L
313 WH17NEY AVE.
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel
i
155
Garcia Margarito, E- Frances P.
312 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
/ Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
213 Shasta Avenue.
bCOCt Homer, t• -Llnaa
5090 Goldman Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 055
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
09
Hubbard Mario, Buena M.
S E C Building LTD.
187 Shasta Avenue.
5154 Goldman Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
A.D. Annotti & Associates
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
10
9010 Corbin Ave. Ste. 112
F.E. Finicial Service
Northridge, Calif. 91324
92 Fleet Street.
London, Enqland. EZ4Y 1
DH
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
11
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 025
-
-
TAYLOR CCNLEY
Moorpark,Properties
4 512 Falkirk Ave,
W -DORIS L
313 WH17NEY AVE.
Oxnard, Calif. 93030
MOOUARy, CA. 93021
/ Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
12
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 045
( —
—
� JOCELYNE
i Moorpark Properties
271 WHITNEY AVE
1 4 512 Falkirk Ave .
MCORPARK, CAL. 93021
Oxnard, Calif. 93030
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
13
Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 065
Sterling- Storage No 1
NEWST4a1 PAUL
t 7061 Hayvenhurst Ave. Ste. 20(
M-ROSE MARY
231 Fk1 M49Y AVE.
� Van Nuys, Calif. 91406
MOCtRPARK, CAL. 93021
L. .
Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 085
FCSSUM FIORD,
I
R -MARY A
13247 TR.LPCLI STREET.
syu -iAR CAL. 91342
JAMES D. WEAK
Mayor
THOMAS C. FERGUSON
Mayor Pro Tern
ALBERT PRIETO
Councilmember
DANNY A. WOOLARD
Councllmember
LETA YANCY - SUTTON
Councllmember
DORIS D. BANKUS
City Clerk
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
MOORPARK
STAFF REPORT TO:
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting of July 23, 1986
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
RICHARD MORTON
Director of
Community
Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP -338 -347 & 349 -353
LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO. LDM -8
Applicant: Mark Annotti
9010 Corbin, #12
Northridge, CA. 91324
Subject: Request for Development Plan Nos. DP- 338 -347, 349 -353
to construct (15) industrial facility which encompasses
9.52 acres - 15 structures ranging from 5,000 to 30,701
square feet.
The applicant is also requesting a Land Division under
the tentative Parcel Map No. PM -4204 to subdivide the
9.52 acres site into 15 separate lots of record.
Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Land and Shasta Avenue.
Assessor Parcel No. 511- 07 -42.
GP /Zoning: Light Industrial - M -1
Surrounding Property:
Zoning /Uses:
North: M -1 (DP- 326 -331)
South: M -1 & M -2 (DP -324)
East: R -1 (Existing homes)
West: M -2 (Vacant)
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 2 of 4
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
Environmental: Mitigate Negative Declaration
Issues: a) Traffic: Mitigated - Contribution to the Los
Angeles Area of Contribution.
b) Internal circulation
Proiect Description:
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property
into 15 separate lots. The existing site now contains
9.52 acres. In addition, he is requesting 15 indust-
rial facilities to be constructed on the site.
NO. OF PARKING
SPACES PROVIDED
25
26
21
21
26
26
21
14
14
13
13
35
70
54
36
The reason for the variation in parking ratio is because
a portion of the buildings have a greater percentage of
office which requires more parking. The developer has
provided adequate spaces to meet the parking requirements
under both office and industrial development standards.
BLDG_ SIZE
LOT SIZE
SQUARE FEET
23,030
10,400
20,756
12,400
20,755
12,400
20,755
10,614
20,756
10,614
20,756
12,240
20,755
10,800
14,375
5,000
14,375
5,000
101,730
5,246
10,730
5,246
26,738
15,372
50,662
30,701
47,782
30,701
35,000
14,635
NO. OF PARKING
SPACES PROVIDED
25
26
21
21
26
26
21
14
14
13
13
35
70
54
36
The reason for the variation in parking ratio is because
a portion of the buildings have a greater percentage of
office which requires more parking. The developer has
provided adequate spaces to meet the parking requirements
under both office and industrial development standards.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP -338 -347 & 349 - 353 /LDM -8 P. 3 of 4
APPLICANT: Mark Annotti
DATE: July 23, 1986
Project Description: (continued)
Access to the site will be from Goldman Avenue.
The architecture of the buildings will be low - profile
structure with a maximum height of 26 feet. The facili-
ties will be constructed of alternating bands of smooth
and split -face block. In addition, store -front glazing
will be detailed in brown anodized aluminum and bronze
glass will be utilized over portions of the exterior.
Additional access to each of the buildings will be
provided by either roll -up or passage doors.
Traffic - Internal Circulation:
Staff Comments:
Upon staff evaluation of the proposed development, the
developer was condition to provide a traffic circulation
study, addressing internal circulation for the area
north and west of Goldman Avenue between the eastern
boundary line of LDM -8 and Maureen Lane. In addition,
the developer was conditioned to provide a study indicating
signal warrants for Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane
where they intersect with Los Angeles Avenue.
The City Engineer has received this data as outlined
above. Thus, the developer has been conditioned
appropriately to mitigate these concerns.
The proposed development has been revised to reflect
the site plan that your Commission has in package.
The overall lay -out of the project provides for
internal circulation along with a well - designed
Industrial Park.
Recommended Action:
Make the following findings:
1. The proposed. project will not have a significant effect on the
environment and the Commission has reviewed and considered the
information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
approves the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as having
been completed in compliance with State SEQA Guidelines issued
thereunder and;
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 4 of 4
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
Recommended Action: (continued)
2. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of
LDM -8.
3. Approval of DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 subject to the attached conditions.
4. That the Planning Commission hereby request staff to prepare
a resolution of conditional approval for the Commission's
adoption at it's next regular meeting of August 13, 1986.
The decision of your Commission is final unless appealed to the City
Council within 15 days.
Prepare
l
Exhibits:
Diane Eaton
Associate Planner
1. Traffic Study
2. Location Map
3. Plot Plan
4. Elevation
5. Mitigated Negative
Declaration
w
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand
for new parking?
C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation
systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and /or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental servies in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
. 39X6_11
8/-
**/I--- --
YES MAYBE NO
b. Substantial increase in demand upon emoting sources
of energy or require the development of new sources
of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or substantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications system?
C. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements?
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health _
hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
or will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact _
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal:
a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- _ i00K
al sites?
b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known
archaeological or historical site within,the
vicinity of the project? Of
C. Result in destruction or alteration of a known
archaeological or historical site near the
vicinity of the project?
i.
YES MAYBE NO
41, MANDATORY VMINGS OF FICANCE.
a. es t project have the potential to degrade
th ua ty of the environment, substantially
redu th habitat of a fish or wildlife species
cause i�h or wildlife population to drop
below se -st{ staining levels, threaten to
eliminate Iant or animal community, red
the number o estrict the range of a rar or
endangered plan 'or animal or eliminate portant /
examples of the or periods of Cali rnia
history or prehisto ?
b. Does the project have t poten al to achieve
short -term, to the disadv to of long -term,
environmental goals? (A sh t -term impact on
the environment is one wh' urs in a
relatively brief, defin" ive pe d of time
while long -term impac will endu well into
the future.)
c. Does the proje;et ave impacts which are• dividu-
ally limited, cumulatively considerabl
(A project impact on two or more separat
resources ere impact on ea.h resource is
relativ small, but where the effect of the
total those impacts on the environment is
Sig icant.)
d. es the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
III. RECOMMENDATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find
with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact
on the environment.
_ I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to
class
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a'significant effect on
0eethe environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
SHOULD BE PREPARED.
I find proposed project MAY have a.significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental
Impact Report is required.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment. and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified
Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing
EIR is required.
Discussion
Although the project may cumulatively have an effect on
traffic, the developer is conditioned to contribute to
the Los Angeles Area of Contribution to mitigate this
concern.
18/86
Diane Eaton
Associate Planner
MOORPARK
JAMES D. WEAK
STEVEN KUEr:Y
Mayor �. -" `' •_o
City Manager
„r,jMAS C. FERGUSON o
CHERYL J. KA N E
Mayor Pro Tem �
City Attorne;v
ALBERT PRIETO
RICHARD MORTON
Councilmember
Director of
DANNY A. WOOLARD
Community
Councilmember '�,
Development
LETA YANCY - SUTTON
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
Councilmember
City Engineer
DORIS 0. BANKUS
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
City Clerk
Chef of Police
THOMAS P. GENOVESE MEMORANDUM
City Treasurer
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Dick Morton, Interim Planning Director
Mark Wessel, Project Engineer M 5 W
February 27, 1986
SUBJECT: Review of Traffic Analysis for
PM 4204, LDM -8 (Annotti)
After reviewing the subject study, I have the following
comments:
1. It should first be pointed out that although the
normal approach for a study such as this is to
conservatively estimate project impacts by
assuming worst -case conditions, a slightly
different approach is recommended in this case.
This is because access for the industrial area in
Question, which has much potential for
development, relies entirely on two closely- spaced
streets connecting to Los Angeles Avenue. It
could therefore be a mistake to continue
development on the basis that conservative traffic
projections _ ndicate that a warranted traffic
signal will eventually solve access problems if
the actual traffic volumes that occur do not quite
warrant a signal. It seems that the conservative
approach in this case is to find a different
solution and not count on a traffic signal to
solve the access problem unless traffic
projections indicate relatively strongly that a
signal will be warranted. If,-the projections do
not give such an indication, and an alternate
solution to the access problem is not found,
consideration should be given to restricting
development in this area.
EXH =B =T if 1 It
799 Moorpark Avenue
(805) 529 -6864
Page -2-
�. In view of the fact that the City Land Use Element
defines the .area analyzed in the subject study as
"Light Industrial" and "Medium Industrial ",
further discussion is needed to explain why it was
considered more appropriate to base trip
generation on "Manufacturing" land use (ITE Code
140) instead of "Industrial" (ITE Code 100) or
"General Light Industrial" (ITE Code 110). This
discussion should include the relative effect on
signal warrants. Comment No. 1 should be kept in
mind relative to this discussion.
3. Consistent with Comment No. 1, it is recommended
that the square footage per acre assumption of 50%
be reduced to 45 %, based on a recent survey of
sixteen Moorpark industrial projects that
concluded the average development intensity was
approximately 42 %. Again, it should be emphasized
that this is not intended to set a precedent and
that 50% is certainly not considered overly
conservative for most cases.
4. Pat Perovich, of CalTrans Traffic Operations, has
indicated that rural warrants may continue to
apply in the future because the critical speed
along Los Angeles Avenue is not expected to fall
below 40 mph. She stated that this is of
secondary importance compared to the overall
volumes, however. Although CalTrans does not
necessarily require that two warrants be
satisfied, they rarely install a signal based on
Warrant 2 alone. Our interpretation is that a
signal would be warranted if Warrants 2 and 3 were
satisfied, which would require that 80% of Warrant
1 be satisfied. This should be addressed when the
warrants are reanalyzed.
5. The report should discuss the effect on the signal
warrants caused by traffic that will gravitate to
the signalized intersection, if one of the
intersections is indeed signalized. If Maureen
Lane is signalized, for instance, most of the
traffic on Goldman Avenue wishing to proceed east
could be expected to access Los Angeles Avenue via
Maureen Lane even though it is slightly out of
their way.
6. Trip distribution assumptions should consider that
Tierra Rejada Road may be connected as early as
1987.
Page -3-
7. There should be an estimate, qualified if
necessary, as to when the internal connection
between Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue will be
needed. This estimate need not necessarily be a
specific date, but may instead be based on the
degree of buildout in the study area.
8. The report should address the extent of any delays
expected to be experienced by vehicles attempting
to access Los Angele's Avenue from Goldman Avenue
and Maureen Lane. It is anticipated that Los
Angeles Avenue will consist of four travel lanes
and a two -way left turn lane by 1987. Temporary
mitigation measures that could be implemented in
the interim prior to signalization of Goldman
Avenue or Maureen Lane should be discussed.
9. If a signal is anticipated, there should be an
estimate (qualified if necessary) as to when it
should be installed.
10. If a signal is warranted, the report should
discuss the advantages in locating it at one
intersection rather than at the other
intersection (Maureen Lane vs. Goldman Avenue).
11. The gap- creating effect, if any, of the proposed
signal at Tierra Rejada Road - Los Angeles Avenue
should be discussed relative to traffic attempting
to access Los Angeles Avenue from Maureen Lane or
Goldman Avenue.
MW:jg3
cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager
R. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer
Bob Warren, Ramseyer and Associates
John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer
John Wanger, Project Engineer
Mark Annotti, Annotti and Associates
JN 3752
CITY OF MOORPARK
DEPAR`IMENT OF CCxMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
799 MOORPARK AVENUE
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
x MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
I. PROJECT DFSCRIPTION:
1. Entitlement; _ Development Plan Permit No. DP-35-3
2. Applicant; Annotti Associates
3. Proposal; Construct a 114,635 square foot industrigllmanufacturing
building.
4. Location and Parcel Ntrnber (s) :
On Goldman Avenue between Maureen L.anp and Shasta Auenue-
Assessor Par el No 511 -07 -42
5. Responsible Agencies:
None.
II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
An initial study was conducted by the Department of ConTnunity Development
to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment.
Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has
been determined that this project could, qgMJAXRqk, have a significant
effect upon the environment.
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY:
These potentially significant in-pacts can be satisfactorily mitigated
through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of
approval.
MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS:
(IF APPLICABLE)
Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the
City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of cnntrihutinn. Actual
deposit shall be the then current L.A_ Area of Cnntribut -inn annlirahlP
rate.
III. PUBLIC REVIEW:
1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300
feet.
2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986
Prepared by: Approved by:
Diane Eaton 6/13/86
(Name) (Date)
(Name) (Date)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on
Wednesday , the 9th of July , 1986, beginning at the hour of 7:00
p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located
at 799 Moorpark Avenue-, Moorpark, California, 93021, for the purpose
of consideration of the proposed project herein below described.
notice is hereby further given that, pursuant to california State Law,
an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project
would significantly effect the environment, and that, based upon an
initial review, it has been found that a significant effect would occur;
therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incomp-
liance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder.
Entitlement: Development Plan Permit Nos.:
DP -338
- 10,400
sq.ft.
DP -345 -
5,000
sq.ft.
DP -339
- 12,240
sq.ft.
DP -346 -
51000
sq.ft.
DP -340
- 12,240
sq.ft.
DP -347 -
5,246
sq.ft.
DP -341
- 10,614
sq.ft.
DP -349 -
5,246
sq.ft.
DP -342
- 10,614
sq.ft.
DP -350 -
15,372
sq.ft.
DP -343
- 12,240
sq.ft.
DP -351 -
30,701
sq.ft.
DP -344
- 10,800
sq.ft.
DP -352 -
30,701
sq.ft.
DP -353 -
14,635
sq.ft.
Applicant: Annotti Associates
Proposal: To construct industrial /manufacturing buildings as
listed in the above entitlement.
Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta
Avenue.
Assessor Parcel No.: 511 -07 -42
unmTrF
rTnmrrF
NTnrPTrV
If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the Department of Community Development at or prior to the public
hearing.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact
the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone (805) 529 -6864.
Dated: June 23, 1986
By:
Title: Administrative Secretary
Proof of Publication
In the matter of
f- rctltlouS t3ur, nee > Name :,I.+t#•wvfit No
STATE 011 CALIFORNIA
County of Ventura
City of Moorpark
I ain a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County alo(ersaid. I aril over the age of eighteen years.
and -)of a party to or interested in the above - entitled
matter i am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a
newspaper of general circulation published in the city of
Moorpark. County of Ventura, and which newspaper has
been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the C;ounly of Ventura. State of
California under the date of April 27. 1981,
Case number SP49672. that the notice. of which the an.
nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en-
tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates. to -wit;
all in the year
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Moorpar alifornia,
this as_-- dcy of 19
�. 4. - -
Signature
MOORPARK NEWS
7240 Moorpark Ave.
P.O. Box 775
Moorpark, CA 93021
_you . Z0.,w
JUN 2 6 1986
City Of Miarpark
This space is h,r the C:nunty Clr•rti I"iling Sly +rill•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HER BY GIVEN that a public hearing will be
held before the P Co of C ,-of M
park. C oni* i
the i>$ur of 7:00 pm.. m the Council Chain i
in the :Hall of said City, , located, a ;,799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark California,,93021. for the purpose of co
>�
sideration of the proposed pr;Oect'hefeinbelow described.
Notice is hereby further liven thaknpunmont'toiCalifot-
nia State Law. San; evaluat on.h*p.begn. condu�,ted.to -dater
mine if the p ro would' aigtiffi tly
•` je�ecM u cari ltfect tt}e
environment, a d P.ha . p'o� uuEisi�> r ,;;11 has
beefi fddi d tha6 a eign>iEkULQ4 effee4vmuld -ocp
ApOerefore,pa
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incorp-
.pliance with State CEQA Guidelnoea isaped thdred6der.
Entitlement: Development Plan Permit No's: i
DP- 338 - 10,400 sq.ft. • '; _ - ; -- . , DP -'45 -5,000 sq.> t.
DP- 339 - 12,240 sq:ft. DP-346=5 000 soft.
DP- 34d = 12,240 sq.ft: °
DP- 341 -- 10,614 sq.ft. DP- 349 -5,246 ft.
Dh -3d% 10,614 f - - � . _ —
" P_843-:42,2407.q .f� � - �P- "35n'= 13',37Z"° . t.
DP- 351 - 30,701 sq.ft
..P- 344 = 10,800 fik '
�' �. c. ?. pp-35358� X70 �q.fti
�fi3�q.fti:
Applicant: Annotti 4ssociates
Pr6poef4I Tp construct industriallmanufacturing buildings a i
listed in the above entitlement. f
Location:'fOri Goldman Avenue betwbm* 11 a&66ril.ane and
Shasta A Ve' nve. L
Asseegoc Parcel No.:`511 -07-42 ,
NOTICE NOTICE 3
If you challengd the r NOay t
- 1united to raisin' only opoeed.:erction, in, Court, you .may
><ng my those issues you or someone else
at the public hearing described in, QosnQtice. or in writt
correspondence tfelivered 4w this, DhOir �went of Communit
Continued frown Pao WY Y 3' .
Development at or prior to the public bearing•
if YOU.
cm ve any y or oo®menta the
p
tart the U t y Development t
at or prior to the public hearing.
If j you have an comnmeentts or questions this
contact a�the�City Hall, 799, oocparlc A �t t
vent>fe, Moorpark. o�ua
93021; Phone: 529 -6864.
Dated June 23, 1986
tin
ivdia
Administrative Selccrret ryr
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on
Wednesday , the 9th day of . July , 19 869
beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City
Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark - Avenue, Moorpark, California- 93021
for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law,
an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could
significantly affect the environment, and that. based upon an uniti.al review,
it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore a Negative
Declaration has been completed _in -compliance with State CEQA- Guidelines
issued -thereunder.
Entitlement:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Assessor's Parcel No. :
NOTICE
LAND DIVISION MOORPARK LDM -8
Annotti Associates
Subdivision of land into 15 parcels.
On Goldman Avenue between Maureen*Lane
and Shasta Avenue.
511 -07 -42
NOTICE
NOTICE
If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited
to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the Planning Department at or prior to the public hearing.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the
Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529 -6864.
DATED: June 23 , 19 86 .
B
Title: A rctinistrative Secretary
Proof of Publication
In the matter of
f`rctltfous bu'•,nes -. Nail.t :+t.rt+ ++ t nl No
Lbm_g
STATE OF (;ALIFORty +A
County of Ventura
City of Moorpark
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid. f a- over the age of eighteen years
and not a party to or interested in the above - entitled
matter. I am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a
newspaper of general crrculat,on published in the city of
Moorpark. County of Ventura. and which newspaper has
been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County r;t veolura. State r�f
California under the date of April 27 198'
Case number SP49672. that the notice. of which the an
nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en
tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates. to -wit,
a�
all in the year 19----. - —
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Date,aat Moorpark alifornia,
this dr-, of
Signature
MOORPARK NEWS
724D Moorpark Ave.
P.O. Box 775
Moorpark, CA 93021
6 J
Cir, cT
This ,tin +.�. o, f ,, thv (,mml� Cli!tk 5 f -tlrno Sl. +nr1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING +H'
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public heari*g will b..e
held b�eoe the P Commission of the Ci of Moor-
park.
. California. al on W y, _the 8th day of . � 1986.
at the hour Of 7:00 p.m., m the Council hers
in the City Hall of said City. located at 789
Avenue; c;alifarnia, 930211 fate, foie . k
con-
sideration of the P�� Pro3«x►�
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN. that. T t
to California State Law, an evaluation has been co ,ucted to
determine if the proposed pro'ect could aignii�natly.affect
the environment, and that, = u an u�utt��aLL MUM it
has been found that a eigaiRcxat � woald Got occur;
thereforre, a Negative Declaration, has bees in
eomplian,oe with, the-State CEQA Gvideiiass issuce ,thereun-
.. - Oil
Entitlement Land biviaion Moorpark LDM-8 l
-' Applicant: Annotti Ass6dater . f
Proposal: Subdivision of land into •16 parcels i
Location: On Goldman Avenue between M*ureen bane Bind
Shasta Avenue = 1 3
Assessor Parcel No.: 611 -07-42
NOTICE -NOTICE NOTICE
If you challenge the proposed action, In Court, you may be
at to raising only those hwuse you or someone else raised
public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at or
prior to the public hearing.
If you have any Questions or cowzmmts regarding the
Project, contact the Community Developmsat at the City
Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, Ghfornia, 93021;
Phone: 629 -6864.
f
DATED: June 23.198¢ ,
Celia LaFleur
. Secretary
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF Moorpark )
I, CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on June 23, 1986
Monday , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT
NOS. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 ON JULY 91 1986? TO INCLUDE LDM -8
by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark ,
California addressed to SEE ATTACHED
Dated: June 23, 1986
Deputy City Clerk
1
-- Leslxes Pool Mart, Inc.
Mallery Dale, C- Shirley C. 20222 Plummer Street.
336 Shasta Avenue. Chatsworht, Calif. 91311
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 015
Seely Bernard, J- Barbara A.
337 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 025
Nunez Ramiro, G -Lucy S.
550 Los Angeles Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 015
Jaegge Robin. P- Cathie
L. Stenzel, David M- Yvonne.
287 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 025
Barnett Kathyrn J.
5584 Birch View Lane.
Camarillo, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 035
Pratti Thomas, S -Mary E.
237 Shasta Street.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 page 07 Parcel 09
Spencer Family Trust
784 Poindexter Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 23
Country Properties L.T.DrPH -III
Kimmel Jerome -Bryna
8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 32
Mann Family Trust.
9650 Calvin Ave.
Northridge, Calif. 91324
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 33
Elmore Parke -June.
30756 Passageway Place.
Agoura, Calif. 91301
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 36
Kimmel Jerome - Bryna.
8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
a
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 42
White Ward H. -
Moorpark, Properties.
141 Dusenberg Drive. STE. 10
Westlake Villave, Calif. 91362
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 43
Mundee Harvey K.
P.O.Box 2488
Paso Robles, Calif. 93446
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 45
MoorparT, Stow -It Properties
ATTN: Howard L. Hughes
9665 Wilshire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, Calif. 90212
Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 46
City Of Moorpark.
P.O. Box 701
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
r.- %_armetla
Claffey Daniel, P- Rozilina
730 Sierra Ave
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 page 141 Parcel 0�
Flores Eduardo, L -Lilia
750 Sierra Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
__9_ _
Book 511 Page 141 Parcel 09
Ruiz Richard,Gr celda.
90 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 01
Barnett Robert, I -Joyce F.
163 Whitney Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 02
Baker Curtis, D- Charlotte
162 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book:.511 Page 145 Parcel 01
Hallan Eugene, G- Beverly A.
163 Shasta ave.
obrpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 02
! Sustaita Evelmen, L -Edith L.
412 S. Havenside
Newbury Park, Calif. 91320
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 03
Lee Herbert, P- Patricia A.
113 Shasta Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 04
Corralejo XX& George
1577 N. Dara
Camarillo, Calif. 93010
r
I
711 -PAICMAR AVE.
MOORPARK CAL. 93021
Bodo 511 Page 124 Parcel 065
IgySCNG grVI0EJ
B-R06A M
731 PALCMAR AVE.
HXRPARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 124 Parcel 075
knJCAiD WMCE
E-DELC tES J-
7 30 DIAUD
MMRpARK, CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 115
M9R•l jaiN T,
K. .qw Wnjam E - PHYLL
413 SHASTA AVE
MJORpARK CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 125
C1{A VML N JOHN
V JR r,, CaV=
387 SH?CS'PA AVE,
MOORPARK CAL 93021
Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 135
GRINDER DONALD
L_ MARY A
` 363 SHASTA AVE
MO(WARK CAL, 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 015
pX*C t STANLY
L=SE D
F��aRP� �1�3021 �
Book 511 P 134 parcel 035
&'
jCBE _ SrEMW r
L- CARD
291 wan= AVE
MOMAMC, CAL. 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 055
VII3 Atzw— m Foy r
K_NWA G
251 WHrn= AVE -
MOWARK CAL.
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 075
FORD AWMCK iI
H-H;w E 1
211 Fiil'M AVE -
HO RPAM, CAL. 93021
l
II
1'
�r1Cnu�a -
168 Shasta Avenue.
% toorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 105
Hi99inbotham Ronald, E- Sharon
210 Shasta Avenue.
93021
Moorpark, Calif.
Book 511_ Page 134 Parcel 115
Franco Arthur, Vera. I
230 Shasta Street.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 125
Magill Charles W.
250 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 135
Valdez David Abraham, ;
Leticia Borboa.
270 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021 +
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 145
Valenza Samuel, Myrna Trust
290 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021 '
i
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 155
Garcia Margarito, E- Frances P.
312 Shasta Avenue.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
,JE y�A,✓d, CArHFei�1.�
Q � : �l��C
.. ♦,.J.,.J, �au�ctlnC.
bcott nomer, r -Linaa
213 Shasta Avenue.
5090 Goldman Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 055
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
09
Hubbard Mario, Buena M.
S E C Building LTD.
187 Shasta Avenue.
5154 Goldman Ave.
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
Moorpark, Calif. 93021
A.D. Annotti G Associates
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
10
9010 Corbin Ave. Ste. {12
F.E. Finicial Service
Northridge, Calif. 91324
92 Fleet Street.
London, England. EZ4Y 1
DH
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
11
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 025
Moorpark,Properties
ThyLO t OCNLZY
4 512 Falkirk Ave.
W -DORIS L
Oxnard, Calif. 93030
313 bHI'mx AVE.
MOORPARK, CA. 93021
Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
12
Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 045
) Moorpark Properties
C ARD ,)OCELYNE
! 4 512 Falkirk Ave.
271 Wf rTNE'Y AVE
Oxnard, Calif. 93030
MOORPARK, CAL. 93021
' Book 511 Page 151 Parcel
13
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 065
Sterling- Storage No 1
NFWS"I" PAM
`' 7061 Hayvenhurst Ave. Ste.
200
M"pcGE MARY
Van Nuys, Calif. 91406
231 wKri EY AVE.
HOWARK, CAL. 93021
0 --
-
Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 085
1 W,MRD,
I
FCSS(Z
R -KM A
13247 7RIPCi.r S'I IMT-
'
SYLMAR CAL. 91342
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. r of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot
plan(s) and eleveations labeled Exhibits "3" & "4" except or
unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design
of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot
plans and elevations.
2. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations
of the M -1 (Light Industrial) Zone and all agencies of the State
of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other
governmental entities.
3. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year
after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically
expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may;
at his, discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for
use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent
areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration
of use during the initial one year period.
4. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community
Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application,
but any Major Modification is to be considered by the City Planning
Commission.
5. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy of this building
by any tenant, either the owner or prospective tenant shall file
a modificaiton application for this permit. The purpose of the
modification shall determine if the proposed use is compatible
with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of this permit.
Also that staff shall review proposed occupancy to determine
if the request will be a Minor or Major Modification.
6. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area
and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements
and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City Authorities,
and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference
become conditions of this permit.
7. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as
permitting or requiring any violatib-n of law, or any unlawful
rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental
agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply,
the stricter ones shall take precedence.
8. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development
plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate
any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 2 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
9. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained
from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained
from the Building and Safety Division.
10. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping
and planting plan (3 sets),.together with specifications and
maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape
Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape
Plan Check, shall be submittted to the Director of Community
Development and the Planning Commission for review and approval.
the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of
final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting
plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark.
All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved
prior to the inauguration of use of this permit.
11. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade
coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described
as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen
tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided
to the curb.
12. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be
drought tolerant, low -water using variety.
13. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window.
14. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within
the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated
driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian.
15. Landscaping (trees) shall not be places directly under any overhead
lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level.
16. That the final design of site improvements, including materials
and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission.
17. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air -cond-
itioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall
be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing.
Said screening material shall be of similar material used in
the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance
of a zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof
mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the City
Planning Commission.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
DP -33o -347 & 349 -353 p, 3 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
18. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which
will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the
building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid
fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall
be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development.
19. That all utilities shall be underground.
20. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and
shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and
appropriate wheel blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas.
21. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code,
Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required.
22. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch)
exten,iun of tine parapet wall above the highest point of the
roof.
23. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property
owner or of lessee(s) or operators) of the subject use, ther
shall be filed with the Director of Community Development
the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s)
or operators(s), together with a letter form any such person(s),
acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this
permit.
24. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use
of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought
against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit
or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee
will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City
may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action.
The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense
of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve
permittee of his obligation under this condition.
25. That permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or operation
under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee
of all conditions of this permit.
26. That disposal of all potential hazardous wastes shall be
by a means approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health
Division, and to include State and Federal agencies.
27. Prior to occupancy by tenant or subsequent owner that would
employ or dispose of toxic or hazardous waste a Major Modification
shall be processed and filed.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPT.TrANT
Lti l r# ;
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
p. 4 oft 22
28. That prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any or all
uses, the applicant must obtain approval from the Ventura
County Environmental Health Department.
29. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection
control devise shall be installed on the water system in
accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental
Health Department.
30. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities
shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee
shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as
indicated by the City Inspector within thirty (30) days after
notification.
31. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional"
Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained
from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 5 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer;
shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post
sufficient surety guaranteeing completion.
2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered
professional Civil Engineer in the State of California.
The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations
of the approved Soils Report.
3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall
post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing,
and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road
Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as
follows:
- All driveways to be 25' wide with 10' radius curb
returns per plate E -2.
4. That prior to any work being conducted within the State
or City right -of -way, the developer shall obtain an
Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency.
5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate
feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency
storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in
writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition on any water
well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site.
If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are
abandoned and have not been properly sealed, thev must be
destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353
APPLICANT: Mark Annotti
DATE: July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and
approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and
hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with
the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement
and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improvements. The drainage
plans and calculations shall indicate the
following conditions before and after development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water
courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions,
collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and
drainage courses.
P. 6 of 22
8. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street
lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing
of the street lights.
9. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the
construction of this project, all work shall be
immediately stopped and the Ventura County
Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department,
the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall
be notified immediately. work shall not proceed until
clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
10. Developer shall obtain reciprocating access and
drainage easements, as well as offsite construction
permission, from all adjacent properties sharing
a common driveway or paking lot.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 7 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF "S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction
phase, or a 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around
the construction site.
2. construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured
during nonworking hours.
3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior
doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings
where access may be made.
4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone
on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall
be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the
parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and
shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent
properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected
by weather and breakage- resistant covers.
5. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street.
6. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in
width with radius curb returns.
7. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide
enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly.
8. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum
of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. Entrance
glass doors are acceptable.
9. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five pintumbler
operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving
guide a minimum of 1 inch.
10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped
with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed
so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the
closed or locked position.
11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area,
i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 8 Of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. That access roads shall be installed with an all- weather surface,
suitable for access by fire department apparatus.
2. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 -feet
6- inches (13'6 ").
3. That approved turn - around areas for fire apparatus shall be pro-
vided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main
thoroughfare.
4. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow
a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the public
roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing
in both directions. The method of gate control shall be subject
to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention.
5. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be
submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy.
7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to
the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the
location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within
300 feet of the development.
8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to
combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards
of the County Water Works Manual.
° Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and
shall have 1 four inch and 2 two an one -half inch
outlet(s).
° The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less
than 20 psi residual pressure.
° Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and
so located that no structure will be farther than 150
feet from any one hydrant.
° Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face
24 inches at center.
It
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 9_of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of
building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls,
and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O
Guide for 'Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans
and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2750
gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water
purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project.
10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1500 gallons per minute
shall be provided at this location.
11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared
for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the
Ventura county Weed Abatement Ordinance.
12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be
installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to
the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where
structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger
numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the
street. In the event a structure(s) shall be posted adjacent to
the driveway entrance.
13. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
14. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with
National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The place-
ment of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention
Bureau.
15. That if any buildings are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler
system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check,
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
16. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguisher
system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure
proper installation.
17. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for
approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention.
18. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or
5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic
fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance
No. 14.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353JLDM -8 p. 10 oft
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO.! CONDITIONS
1. That the applicant shall be required to submit engineering data,
satisfactory to the District, that demonstrates sufficient
fireflow is available to all parcels.
2. That the construction of off -site water and sewer mains may
be required to extend to the District's existing trucklines.
3. The district is in the early stages of planning a sewage treat-
ment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of
flow into the existing treatment plant is directly related to
the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are
made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed
prior to completion of any plant expansion. This could cause
a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant
to insure the plant expansion will be complete when sewer service
begins.
4. That no new sewer main or lateral improvements shall be construct-
ed deeper than 15 -feet.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 11 of 22
Mark Annotti 1 -7
July 23, 1986
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8
1. That the conditions of approval of this parcel map supersede
all conflicting notation, specifications, dimensions, typical
sections and the like which may be shown on said map and that
all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of
Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply.
2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura
County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity
shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall,
by reference, become conditions of this entitlement.
3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as
permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules
or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency.
In instances where more than on set of rules apply, the stricter
ones shall take precedence.
4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement
are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any
of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
5. That applicant agrees as a conditions of issuance (or renewal)
and use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action
brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of
this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit.
Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or
attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to
pay as a result of any such action City may, at its sole dis-
cretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation
under this condition.
6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be
acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this map.
7. As of the date of recordation of final (parcel) map, the lots
depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning
ordinances and General Plan then applicable to the property.
Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the
zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date
the tentative map is conditionally approved. Conditional approval
of th tentative map shall neither limit the power of the
legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or
general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such
amendments.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
C nATF :
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8
I
P- _�_o Of 22
j-7
I
8. That at the time water service connection is made, cross
connection control devices shall be installed on the water
system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County
Division of Environmental Health.
9. Prior to recording of the parcel map, the Developer shall obtain
a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal Water District
indicating payment of District's Capital Construction charges.
10. Prior to recordation, a "Unconditional Availability" letter for
water and sewer sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura
County Waterworks District No. 1.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p, 13 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8
Ci.:D That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit
to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a
grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer;
shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post
sufficient surety guaranteeing completion.
1. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit
to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a
detailed Soils Report certified by a registered
professional Civil Engineer in the State of California.
The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations
of the approved Soils Report.
2. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit
to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street
improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall
post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of
the improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing,
and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road
Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as
follows:
- Tejeda Street, "B" Street, and "C" Street shall be
constructed per plate B -3D, with "B" Street being
constructed with fill street improvements east of
the centerline and 12 of paving west of the
centerline.
- All knuckles shall be constructed per plate C -4.
- Cul -de -sac at the end of "C" Street shall be per
plate C -3.
- All streets shall have a minimum.of 4" of asphalt.
.2 That in conjunction with the recordation of the
(Parcel) Map, the developer shall offer to dedicate on
the (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark for public
use, all the public streets right of way shown on the
(Parcel) Map.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 14 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
2.3 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer
shall.offer to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to
the City of Moorpark access easements over all private
streets shown on the Final (Parcel) Map to provide
access for all.governmental - agencies providing the
public safety, health and welfare.
2.4
That prior to , the
developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark
review and approval, street improvements plans
access road from
for
for the
to
, prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an
agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete
these improvements; and shall post sufficient
surety guaranteeing the completion of the improvements.
2.5 That prior
shall enter
to improve
of
to ,
into an agreement with the
the intersection of
the developer
City of Moorpark
to improve the intersection
and
Road Standard Plate
sufficient surety guaranteeing
improvements.
to Ventura County
or better; and post
the completion of the
2.6 That prior to any work being conducted within the State
or City right of way, the developer shall obtain an
Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency.
2.7
That in conjunction with the recordation of the Final
(Parcel) Map, the developer shall offer for dedication
to the City of Moorpark a street easement of sufficient
width along to permit an
ultimate right of way of feet, according to the
applicable Ventura County Road Standard Plate ,
of the centerline of
(alo,ig the entire
frontage of the parent parcel) or (as delineated on the
approved Tentative Map) .
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 15 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
2.8 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer
shall.dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of
Moorpark the access rights adjacent to
along the entire frontage
of the parent parcel except.for approved access road(s)
as delineated on the approved Tentative Maps.
2.9 That in conjunction with recordation,
shall offer to dedicate on the Final
the City of Moorpark
an access easement from
to
the developer
(Parcel) Map to
2.10 That prior to recordation, the developer shall
demonstrate feasible access with adequate
protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the
satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
2.11 That prior to , the developer
shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to
the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark.
2.12 That prior to recordation, the developer shall
deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution
for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of
Contribution.
The actual deposit shall be the then current Los
Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution
applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is
issued.
2.13 That prior to ,the developer
shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a
contribution for the Gabbert Road /Casey Road
Improvement Area of Contribution.
2.14
That prior to
the developer shall deposit with the.City of
Moorpark a contribution for the Moorpark
Road /Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of
Contribution.
The actual deposit shall be the then current
Moorpark Road /Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area
of Contribution applicable rate at the time the
Building Permit is issued.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 16 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
3.1 That in conjunction with recordation, the
developer shall offer to dedicate on the Final Map
to the City of Moorpark, a Public Service Easement
as required.
3.2 That prior to recordation, the developer shall
indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the
disposition of any water well(s) and any other
water that may exist within the site. If any
wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are
abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they
must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No.
2372.
3 3�
That prior to the submittal of the final Map, or a
Parcel Map (containing five or more parcels), or
any Parcel Map whereon dedications are required to
be offered, the developer shall transmit by
certified mail a copy of the conditionally
approved Tentative Map together with a copy of
Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to
each public entity or public utility that is an
easement holder of record. Written compliance
shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark.
3.4
If any of the improvements which the subdivider is
be
required to construct or install is to
constructed or installed upon land in which the
subdivider does not have title or interest
sufficient for such purposes, the subdivider shall
do all of the following at least 60 days prior to
the filing of the final or parcel map for approval
pursuant to Government Code Section 66457.
a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter
"City ") in writing that the subdivider wishes
the City to acquire an interest in the land
which is sufficient for such purposes as
provided in Government Code Section 66462.5;
b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description
of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or
diagram of the interest to be acquired
sufficient to satisfy the requirements of
subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the
Code of Civil Procedure, ( iii) a current
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP -338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 17 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD. LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
appraisal report prepared by an appraiser
approved by the City which expresses an
opinion as to the current fair market value
of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a
current Litigation- Guarantee Report;
C. Enter into an agreement with the City,
guaranteed by such cash deposits or other
security as the City may require, pursuant to
which the subdivider will pay all of the
City's cost (including, without limitation,
attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of
acquiring such an interest in the land.
4.1 There is some concern as to the adequacy of the
size of the existing storm drain facility to which
the storm drain facilities of this project will
connect. There currently exists a retention basin
on site which retains storm water from both
on -site and off -site. Storm drain facilities
shall be sized to handle all on -site and off -site
storm water flows, including the existing water
flows from Goldman Avenue, Tejeda Street, Tech
Circle, and all of the property directly to the
west to their final point of discharge.
Therefore, prior to recordation, the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and
hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with
the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement
and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improvements. The drainage
plans and calculations shall indicate the
following conditions before and after development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water
courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions,
collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and
drainage courses.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 18 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
4.2 That in conjunction with recordation, the
developer shall delineate on the Final (Parcel)
Map areas subject to flooding as a "Flowage
Easement" and then offer the easement for
dedication to the City of Moorpark. Lot to lot
drainage easements, flood hazard areas and
secondary drainage easements shall also be
delineated on the Map.
The subject easements shall be identified based on
hydrologic and hydraulic methodology approved by
the Ventura County Flood Control District.
4.3 That prior to any work begin conducted within
the developer
shall obtain a Ventura County Flood Control
District Watercourse Encroachment Permit.
4.4
4.5
4.6
That prior to recordation, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and
approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in
the subdivision will be protected from flooding.
That prior to , the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, improvement plans prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer; enter into an agreement
to complete the improvements; and post sufficient
surety for the construction of
in accordance with the
"Walnut Canyon Study" dated October, 1980.
That prior to
shall deposit with the City
contribution for the Walnut
Local Drainage Area.
the developer
of Moorpark a
Canyon Improvement
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 19 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
4.7
That in conjunction with recordation, the
developer shall offer to dedicate on the Final
(Parcel) Map to the Ventura County Flood Control
District a storm drain easement of sufficient
width to permit an ultimate right of way of
feet of the centerline of the
in accordance with the
approval of the Flood Control District.
4.8
That prior to recordation, the developer shall
submit to the City of Moorpark for review and
approval, evidence that the CC &R's will include
provisions for maintenance of
5.1
That prior to the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, an Oak Tree Survey prepared by a
qualified arborist, landscape architect, or other
professional specializing in the morphology and
care of oak trees. The developer shall contact
Bill Lockard at 654 -2036 prior to commencement of
said survey.
5.2
That prior to the developer
shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review
and approval, an Oak Tree Report prepared by a
qualified arborist, landscape architect, or other
professional specializing in the morphology and
care of oak trees; and shall be written in
conjunction with an Oak Tree Survey. The
developer shall contact Bill Lockard at 654 -2036
prior to commencement of said report.
6.1
That prior to the developer
shall annex the subject site into Ventura County
Waterworks District No. 1 for the purpose of
obtaining water sewer services.
Q6�-�
Prior to the recordation the developer shall pay
all energy costs associated with street lighting
for a period of one year from the initial
energizing of the street lights.
An erosion control plan shall be submitted for
review and approval along with the grading plan.
Along with the erosion control measures,
hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be
required within 60 days of completion of grading.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 20 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204
9.0 That lot to lot
drainage easeme4,
map. Assurance
these easements
property owners
drainage easements and secondary
nts shall be delineated on the final
shall be provided to the City that
will be adequately maintained by
to safely convey storm water flows.
10.0 That the developer shall construct any necessary
drainage facility, including brow ditch and slope bench
drainage channels, with a permanent earth tone color(s)
so as to minimize visual impacts. Said color(s) shall
be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director
as part of the grading plans.
11.0 That in order to reduce visual impacts, the developer
shall construct all slopes with a "rounded -off" top and
toe, shall blend graded slopes in with natural slopes,
and shall also undulate and vary the angle of slope
faces so as to break -up the appearance of otherwise
flat and uniform slope faces on slopes over 25 ft. in
height.
12.0 An 18" slough wall shall.be constructed directly behind
the back of the sidewalk so as to reduce debris from
entering streets.
13. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the
construction of this project, all work shall be
immediately stopped and the Ventura County
Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department,
the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall
be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until
clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 21 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204)
14.0 A study of traffic concerns conducted by the
Developer's Engineer and the City Engineer indicate
that a traffic signal will eventually be warranted at
either intersection of Los Angeles Avenue with Maureen
Lane or Goldman Avenue. Because Maureen Lane is a
four - legged intersection, the City Engineer has
determined that it is the more appropriate location for
the signal. However, the signalization of either
intersection will necessitate the construction of a
street connecting Maureen Lane with "B" Street.
Therefore, prior to recordation, Developer shall submit
to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street
improvement plans for a street connecting "B" Street
with Maureen Lane, prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer and shall enter into an agreement with the
City of Moorpark to complete the improvements.
The developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing
the construction of the improvements. Said
improvements shall be required to be constructed along
with or prior to construction of the signal. Subject
to City Council.approval the developer of LDM - 8 may
be relieved of this condition if, prior to completion
of the signal at Maureen Lane and Los Angeles Avenue, a
different developer has been conditioned and approved
by the City Council to construct these improvements.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and
gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing,
and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road
Standards. The street shall be constructed per plate
B -3D, modified such that full street improvements be
constructed north of the centerline along with 12' of
paving south of the centerline.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.:
APPLICANT:
UATZ :
DP -338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 P. 22 of 22
Mark Annotti
July 23, 1986
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8
1. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access
road /driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department
vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions
to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to
recordation.
2• That the access road shall be certified by a registered
Civil Engineer as having an lall- weather surface in conformation
with Public Works Standards. This certification shall be submitted
to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention prior to occupancy.
3. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a
40 foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road.
4. That approved turn - around areas or easements for fire apparatus
shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther
from the main thoroughfare.
5. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13
feet 6 inches (13'6 ") .
6. That the private road shall be named if serving more than five
(5) parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire
Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior
to recordation.
7. That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with
the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance
with Plate F -4 of Ventura County Road Standards.
8. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District,
water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM @ 20 psi
shall be installed from the public right -of -way, or from the
purveyor point of connection to the southwest corner of the south
property line of parcel #5 and the southwest corner of parcel #1.
the cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these
mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map).
This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation
shall be completed prior to recordation
9• That prior to recordation, the applicant shall provide to the
fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the
purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project.