Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1986 1006 CC REG ITEM 07CTHOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor DANNY A. WOOLARD Mayor Pro Tem JAMES A. HARTLEY Councilmember ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer T0= FROM = DATE = 1� MOORPARK MEMORANDUM The Honorable City Council Diane Eaton, Associate Planner _._.- October 2, 1986 (City Council meeting of 10/6/86) STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & DP- 349 -353 (Annotti Associates). Continued from September 15, 1986 Proposal Request approval for Development Plan to construct 15 Industrial facilities which encompasses 9.52 acres - 15 structures ranging from 5,000 - 30,701 square feet. Background On July 23, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project. Following staff presentation, the Commission took action to approve LDM -8 which subdivided the 9.52 acre site into 15 separate lots of record with recommended conditions of approval. In addition the Commission recommended approval of DP- 338 -347; and DP- 349 -353 with the attached conditions. Recommend Action Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving DP338 -347; and DP- 349 -353 subject to the recommended conditions for consideration by the City Council at its next regular meeting. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on Tuesday - , the 2 of September 1986, beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021, for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project herein below described. notice is hereby further given that, pursuant to california State Law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project would significantly effect the environment, and that, based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant effect would occur; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incomp- liance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Development Plan Permit Nos.: DP -338 - 10,400 sq.ft. DP -345 - 5,000 sq.ft. DP -339 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -346 - 5,000 sq.ft. DP -340 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -347 - 5,246 sq.ft. DP -341 - 10,614 sq.ft. DP -349 - 5,246 sq.ft. DP -342 - 10,614 sq.ft. DP -350 - 15,372 sq.ft. DP -343 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -351 - 30,701 sq.ft. DP -344 - 10,800 sq.ft. DP -352 - 30,701 sq.ft- DP-353 - 14,635 sq.ft. Applicant: Annotti Associates Proposal: To construct industrial /manufacturing buildings as listed in the above entitlement. Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No.: 511 -07 -42 NCITTC'F. TATOTTCF MCITTC'F- If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Department of Community Development at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone (805) 529 -6864. Dated: June 23, 1986 Title: dministrative Secretar RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF DEVELOP- MENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & DP- 349 -353, ON THE APPLICATION OF MARK ANNOTTI. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 511- 07 -42. WHEREAS, at a duly notice public hearing on July 9, 1986 and July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application filed by Mark Annotti requesting approval of Development Plan Nos. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 to construct 15 industrial facilities which encompasses 9.52 acres, the 15 structures ranging form 5,000 to 30,701 square feet. Project description as follows: Project Description: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the ,property into 15 separate lots. The existing site now contains 9.52 acres. In addition, he is requesting 15 indust- rial facilities to be constructed on the site. BLDG. SIZE LOT SIZE SQUARE FEET NO. OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 23,030 10,400 25 20,756 12,400 26 20,755 12,400 21 20,755 10,614 21 20,756 10,614 26 20,756 12,240 26 20,755 10,800 21 14,375 5,000 14 14,375 5,000 14 10,730 5,246 13 10,730 5,246 13 26,738 15,372 35 50,662 30,701 70 47,782 30,701 54 35,000 14,635 36 The reason for the variation in parking ratio is because a portion of the buildings have a greater percentage of office which requires more parking. The developer has provided adequate spaces to meet the parking requirements under both office and industrial development standards. WHEREAS, the Moorpark Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff re- port is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby approved; SECTION 2. That at its meeting of July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution recommending approval with the modified attached con- ditions for Development Plan Permit No. DP 338 -347: 349 -353; said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner Keenan; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. Claffey, Holland, LaPerch and PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 of August, 1986 Chairman ATTEST: Acting Secretary PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 1 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 of 10 1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot plan(s) and eleveations labeled Exhibits "3" & "4" except or unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 (Light Industrial) ,Zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may; at his_ discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. 4. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, but any Major Modification is to be considered by the City Planning Commission. 5. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy of this building by any tenant, either the owner or prospective tenant shall file a modificatton application for this permit. The purpose of the modification shall determine if the proposed use is compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of this permit. Also that staff shall review proposed occupancy to determine if the request will be a Minor or Major Modification. 6. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City Authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference become conditions of this permit. 7. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 8. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. PH55r;U, tit'�'ttvVr.ii AIJD hi OPTED BY RESOT UTION NO. PC -86 -103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: UATr. : DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 8/13/86 p. 2 of 10 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 10. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submittted to the Director of Community Development and the Planning Commission for review and approval. the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of use of this permit. 11. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade_ coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. 12. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low -water using variety. 13. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 14. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 15. Landscaping (trees) shall not be places directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 16. That the final design of site improvements, including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 17. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air -cond- itioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the City Planning Commission. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS DP -33b -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 8/13/86 p. 3 of 10 18. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 19. That all utilities shall be underground. 20. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas. 21. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. 22. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch) exten-,ion of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 23. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject use, ther shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s) lessee(s) or operators (s) , together with a letter form any such person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this permit. 24. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at is sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 25. That permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or operation under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of this permit. 26. That disposal of all potential hazardous wastes shall be by a means approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division, and to include State and Federal agencies. 27. Prior to occupancy by tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of toxic or hazardous waste a Major Modification shall be processed and filed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NU. PC-86 -103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPT.TCANT - \ Lti1 ri PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 8/13/86 P. 4 of 10 28. That prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any or all uses, the applicant must obtain approval from the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 29. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection control devise shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 30. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City Inspector within thirty (30) days after notification. 31. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional" Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1. Additional Condition: September 19, 1986 32. Prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, traffic signal plans for the installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue with Maureen Lane. The plans shall be prepared by either a Registered Civil Engineer or a Registered traffic Engineer and shall provide for signals, poles, pedestrian facilities, vehicle detection, safety lighting, restriping, wheelchair ramps, and all other equipment and necessary appurtenant work. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 8/13/86 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: - All driveways to be 25' wide with 10' radius curb returns per plate E -2. 4. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right -of -way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. P. 5 of 10 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition on any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 8/13/86 P. 6 Of. 10 8. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 9. If.any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 10. Developer shall obtain reciprocating access and drainage easements, as well as offsite construction permission, from all adjacent properties sharing a common driveway or paking lot. Development Plan Permit No. DP -339 1. Developer shall place a permanent barrier for termination of road improvements at east side of property on Lassen Avenue. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86 i DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPT.T(_ANT LJIn l r+ DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 7 of 10 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF "S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 2. construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone 10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage- resistant covers. 5. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. '. 6. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width with radius curb returns. 7. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly. 8. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. Entrance glass doors are acceptable. 9. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 8 of10 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That access roads shall be installed with an all- weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 2. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 -feet 6- inches (13'6 "). 3. That approved turn - around areas for fire apparatus shall be pro- vided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 4. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the public roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing in both directions. The method of gate control shall be subject to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 5. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have 1 four inch and 2 two an one -half inch outlet(s). ° The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center. 'PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p-__3 of 10 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O Guide for 'Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2750 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. 10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1500 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura county Weed Abatement Ordinance. 12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 13. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 14. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The place- ment of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 15. That if any buildings are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 16. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguisher system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. 17. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention. 18. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance No. 14. I I 'PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -103 8/13/86 APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 - 353 /LDM -8 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 P. 10 oi10 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO.! CONDITIONS 1. That the applicant shall be required to submit engineering data, satisfactory to the District, that demonstrates sufficient fireflow is available to all parcels. 2. That the construction of off -site water and sewer mains may be required to extend to the District's existing trucklines. 3. The district is in the early stages of planning a sewage treat- ment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of flow into the existing treatment plant is directly related to the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed prior to completion of any plant expansion. This could cause a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant to insure the plant expansion will be complete when sewer service begins. 4. That no new sewer main or lateral improvements shall be construct- ed deeper than 15 -feet. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR, Secretary the City of Moorpark, California, do going Resolution No. PC -86 -108 was Commission of said City at a meeting of August , 1986, and that the roll call-vote, to wit: of the Planning Commission of hereby certify that the fore - adopted by the Moorpark Planning thereof held on the 13 day same was adopted by the following AYES: Commissioner Douglas Holland, Jim Keenan, William LaPerch, Daniel Claffey; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Jeffrey Rosen. Witness my hand this 15 Secretary day of August , 1986 ol/ 86 RESOLUTION NO. PC-86-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LAND DIVISION ( MOORPARK) PERMIT NO. LDM -8 ON THE APPLICATION OF MARK ANNOTTI. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 511- 07 -42. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 9, 1986, and July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application filed by Mark Annotti requesting approval a Land Division under the tentative Parcel Map No. PM -4204 to subdivide the 9.52 acres into 15 separate lots of record. Located on Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. WHEREAS, the Moorpark Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has found that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and has reached its decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION, OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the findings contained in the staff report dated July 23, 1986, which report is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein with conditions as modified by said Commission, are hereby approved; SECTION 2. That at its meeting of July 23, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution with attached staff recommended conditions,as modified, does hereby approve Land Division (Moorpark) Permit No. LDM -8; said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action with foregoing direction was approved by the follow- ing roll call vote; AYES: Commissioner Keenan, Claffey, LaPerch, Holland; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: None. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13 day of August, 1986. ATTEST: 4, V Orman Acting Secretary t` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR, Secretary the City of Moorpark, California,. do going Resolution No. PC -86 -104 was Commission of said City at a meeting of August , 1986, and that the roll call vote, to wit: of the Planning Commission of hereby certify that the fore - adopted by the Moorpark Planning thereof held on the 13 day same was adopted by the following AYES: Commissioner.Douglas Holland, Jim Keenan, William LaPerch, Daniel Claffey; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Jeffrey Rosen. Witness my hand this 15 7 a4e-'� Secretary day of August , 1986 ol/86 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: l DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 1 of 8 Mark Annotti _ July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8 1. That the conditions of approval of this parcel map supersede all conflicting notation, ,-specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than on set of rules apply, the strict:r ones shall take precedence. 4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 5. That applicant agrees as a conditions of issuance (or renewal) and use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action City may, at its sole dis- cretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation. under this condition. 6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this map. 7. As of the date of recordation of final (parcel) map, the lots depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinances and General Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date the tentative map is conditionally approved. Conditional approval of th tentative map shall neither limit the power of the legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amendments. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 APPLICANT: ! DATE: l DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8 p. 2_ of 8. 8. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 9. Prior to recording of the parcel map, the Developer shall obtain a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal Water District indicating payment.of District's Capital Construction charges. 10. Prior to recordation, a "Unconditional Availability" letter for water and sewer sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 3 -of -8 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 1. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post-sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendat- ions of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, stripping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: Tejeda Street, "B" Street, and "C" Street shall be con- structed per plate B -3D, with "B" Street being constructed with fill street improvements east of the centerline and 12' of paving west of the centerline. ° All knuckles shall be constructed p4 ° Cul -de -sac at the end of "C" Street C -3. ° All streets shall have a minimum of 4. That in conjunction with the recordation the developer shall offer to dedicate on the City of Moorpark for public use, all right of way shown on the (Parcel) Map. ar plate C -4. shall be per plate 4" of asphalt. of the (Parcel) Map, the (Parcel) Map to the public streets 5. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 4 of 8 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 6. That prior to recodation, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 7. That prior to recordation, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. 8. That in conjunction with recodation, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark, a Public Service Easement as required. 9. That prior to recordation, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. If any of the improvements which the subdivider is required to construct or install is -to be constructed or installed upon land in which the subdivider does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the subdivider shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Government Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter "City ") in writing that the subdivider wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code Section 66462.5; b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by a appraiser approved by the City which expresses and opinion as to the current fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report; PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 p. 5 of 8 PM -4204) 9. C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the subdivider will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 10. There is some concern as to the adequacy of the size of the .existing storm drain facility to which the storm drain facilities of this project will connect. There currently exists a retention basin on site which retains storm water from both on -site and off -site. Storm drain facilities shall be sized to handle all on -site and off -site storm water flows, including the existing water flows from Goldman Avenue, Tejeda Street, Tech Circle, and all of the property directly to the west to their final point of discharge. Therefore, prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calcu- lations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 11. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from flooding. 12. Prior to the recordation the developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 13. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 6 of 8 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 14. That lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. 15. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 16. A study of traffic concerns conducted by the Developer's Engineer and the City Engineer indicate that a traffic signal will eventually be warranted at either intersection of Los Angeles Avenue with Maureen Lane or goldman Avenue. Because Maureen Lane is a four - legged intersection, the City Engineer has determined that it is the more appropriate location for the signal. However, the signalization of either intersection will necessitate the construction of a street connecting Maureen Lane with "B" Street. Therefore, prior to recordation, Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans for a street connecting "B" Street with Maureen Lane, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements. The developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. Said improvements shall be required to be constructed along with or prior to construction of the signal. Subject to City council approval the developer of LDM -8 may be relieved of this condition if, prior to completion of the signal at Maureen Lane and Los Angeles Avenue, a different developer has been conditioned and approved by the City Council to construct these improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The street shall be constructed per plate B -3D, modified such that full street improvements be constructed north of the centerline along with 12' of paving south of the centerline. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 7 of 8 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 17. During construction of this project, the developer shall take all necessary action to guarantee that dust control shall be maintained so that dust from the project site shall not bother the homes adjacent to this project. 18. That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall dedicate on the Parcel Maputo the City of Moorpark the access rights to Lassen Avenue. Said dedication shall restrict both ingress and egress onto Lassen Avenue from this project, easterly from the subject property, toward Shasta Avenue. 19. Within two years of the recordation of the final map, the developer shall acquire, dedicate, improve, and construct the full street improvements for the connector road between the subdivision and Maureen Lane. In order to secure the acquisition, dedication, construction, and improvement of these improvements, the developer shall agree to cooperate, upon notice by the City with other property owners, the City, and other public agencies to provide the improvements as set forth above. In this regard, the developer shall not protest or contest any assessment district or any other financing technique which may be formed or utilized in order to provide such public improvements. The developer shall provide appropriate security guaranteeing all of his obligations under this condition. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. PC -86 -104 8/13/86 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPT.T(_ANT UATL : DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 8 of 8 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 1. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access road /driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation. 2• That the access road shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer as having an lall- weather surface in conformation with Public Works Standards. This certification shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention prior to occupancy. 3. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40 foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road. 4• That approved turn - around areas or easements for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 5. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 ") . 6. That the private road shall be named if serving more than five (5) parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior to recordation. 7. That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F -4 of Ventura County Road Standards. 8. That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District, water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM @ 20 psi shall be installed from the public right -of -way, or from the purveyor point of connection to the southwest corner of the south property line of parcel #5 and the southwest corner of parcel #1. the cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map). This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation 9• That prior to recordation, the applicant shall provide to the fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) it CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on August 18, 1986 , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 RE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 15 INDUST_ RIAL FACILITIES RANGING FROM 5,000 sq. ft. to 30,-000 sq.ft. by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark California addressed to SEE ATTACHED LIST Dated: August 18, 1986 Deputy City Clerk Mallery Dale, C- Shirley C - Leslies Pool Mart, inc. 20222 Plummer Street. 336 Shasta Avenue. Chatsworht, Calif. 91311 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 01 5 r Book 511 page 07 Parcel 09 ; � S Seely Bernard, J- Barbara A. Spencer Family Trust 784 Poindexter Ave. 337 Shasta Avenue. Ij Moorpark, Calif. 93021 ( Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Pa Page 05 ( l e 135 P 2 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 23 -r Country Properties L.T.D. PH -II( Nunez Ramiro, G -Lucy S. Kimmel Jerome -Bryna 550 Los Angeles Avenue. 8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 015 Jaegge Robin. P- Cathie L. Stenzel, David M- Yvonne. 287 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 025 Barnett Kathyrn J. 5584 Birch View Lane. Camarillo, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 035 Pratti Thomas, S -Mary E. 237 Shasta Street. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 rmeiia Claffey Daniel, P- Rozilina 730 Sierra Ave Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 page 141 Parcel 08 Flores Eduardo, L -Lilia 750 Sierra Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 141 Parcel 09 Ruiz Richard,Gr-fcelda, 90 Shasta Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 32 Book 511 Page 143 Parcel O1 Mann Family Trust. Barnett Robert, I -Joyce F 9650 Calvin Ave. 163 Whitney Ave. Northridge, Calif. 91324 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 33 Elmore Parke -June. 30756 Passageway Place. Agoura, Calif. 91301 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 36 Kimmel Jerome - Bryna. 8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 .M Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 42 White Ward H. - Moorpark, Properties. 141 Dusenberg Drive. STE. 10 Westlake Villaqe, Calif. 91362 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 43 Mundee Harvey K. P.O.Box 2488 Paso Robles, Calif. 93446 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 45 MoorparTZ, Stow -It Properties ATTN: Howard L. Hughes 9665 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills, Calif. 90212 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 46 City Of Moorpark. P.O. Box 701 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 02 Baker Curtis, D- Charlotte 162 Shasta Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book. 511 Page 145 Parcel 01 Hallan Eugene, G- Beverly A. 163 Shasta ave. omrpark, Calif. 93021 0 Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 02 Sustaita Evelmen, L -Edith L. 412 S. Havenside Newbury Park, Calif. 91320 Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 03 Lee Herbert, P- Patricia A 113 Shasta Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 04 Corralejo =t George 1577 N. Dara I Camarillo, Calif. 93010 711 -PALS AVE. MXRPARK CAL. 93021 Bode 511 Page 124 Parcel 065 vise SIi�EN B -ROSA M 731 PALCW AVE, MDoRpARK CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 124 Parcel 075 KINCAID KUMCE E- DELCRES J. 730 DIABLO MOpRpARK, CAL, 93021 Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 115 MASCN JOHN T, MASW IfILL.IAM E - R LL 413 SHASTA AVE MOORPARK CAL. 93021 Bode 511 Page 122 Parcel 125 Q{AMB,ERL,IN JCKN V JR r„ CCRnZ 387 S &-M AVE, MOORPARK CAL 93021 Bock 511 Page 122 Parcel 135 GRIXDER DOt kw L- MARY A 363 SHASTA AVE MOORPARK CAL, 93021 i J Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 015 PAi�R ST�� L=SE D p op 9 j021 Bock 511 Page 134 Parcel 035 ST1nmN L- CARIA 291 WHMM AVE 3021 MOORPAM<, CAL. Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 055 vnz'pj(— ROY M-NORA G 251 Pk ra= AVE- 93021 MMRPARK CAL. Bock 511 Page 134 Parcel 075 FORD PATRICK t r r r H-mARY E I 211 I'4HM EY AVE �MRPARK, CAL. 93021 I I �✓iT1>zr1S,�"N 'qep ".) 1'I Ctlulb ✓v­ I - - 168 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 105 Higginbotham Ronald, E- Sharon. 210 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 115 Franco Arthur, Vera. 230 Shasta Street. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 125 Magill Charles W. 250 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 135 Valdez David Abraham, Leticia Borboa. 270 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 145 Valenza Samuel, Myrna Trust 290 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 i Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 155 Garcia Margarito, E- Frances P. 312 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 V «mod, 4g ��,�� .%; ,r .ui 1-, CO a IVL IIIt. bCOCC homer, t*- L1nC7d 213 Shasta Avenue. 5090 Goldman Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 055 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 09 Hubbard Mario, Buena M. S E C Building LTD. 187 Shasta Avenue. 5154 Goldman Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 A.D. Annotti b Associates Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 10 9010 Corbin Ave. Ste. 112 F.E. Finicial Service Northridge, Calif. 91324 92 Fleet Street. London, Enqland, EZ4Y 1 DH 1 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 11 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 025 Moorpark, Properties TAYLOR COY 4 512 Falkirk Ave, W -DORIS L Oxnard, Calif. 93030 313 WHITNEY AVE. MOORPARK, CA. 93021 / Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 12 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 045 ( Moorpark Properties CAD JOCELYNE 4 512 Falkirk Ave . 271 WHITNEY AVE Oxnard, Calif. 93030 MOORPARK, CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 13 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 065 Sterling- Storage No 1 NEI?UrRCM PAUL ' 7061 Hayvenhurst Ave. Ste. 2C M -'ROSE MARY Van Nuys, Calif. 91406 231 Fkil'IT= AVE. MXRpARK, CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 085 EDAARD, I FOS.SiA'i R -MARY A 13247 TRIPOLI $'I?=- SYL1AR CAL. 91342 JAMES D. WEAK Mayor THOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tern ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK STAFF REPORT TO: MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of July 23, 1986 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 LAND DIVISION MOORPARK NO. LDM -8 Applicant: Mark Annotti 9010 Corbin, #12 Northridge, CA. 91324 Subject: Request for Development Plan Nos. DP- 338 -347, 349 -353 to construct (15) industrial facility which encompasses 9.52 acres - 15 structures ranging from 5,000 to 30,701 square feet. The applicant is also requesting a Land Division under the tentative Parcel Map No. PM -4204 to subdivide the 9.52 acres site into 15 separate lots of record. Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Land and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511- 07 -42. GP /Zoning: Light Industrial - M -1 Surrounding Property: Zoning /Uses: North: M -1 (DP- 326 -331) South: M -1 & M -2 (DP -324) East: R -1 (Existing homes) West: M -2 (Vacant) 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: AUUT.T(`AMP- DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 2 of 4 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 Environmental: Mitigate Negative Declaration Issues: a) Traffic: Mitigated - Contribution to the Los Angeles Area of Contribution. b) Internal circulation Project Description: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 15 separate lots. The existing site now contains 9.52 acres. In addition, he is requesting 15 indust- rial facilities to be constructed on the site. T f-%m c- rnILI BLDG. SIZE SQUARE FEET NO. OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 23,030 10,400 25 20,756 12,400 26 20,755 12,400 21 20,755 10,614 21 20,756 10,614 26 20,756 12,240 26 20,755 10,800 21 14,375 51000 14 14,375 5,000 14 10,730 51246 13 10,730 5,246 13 26,738 15,372 35 50,662 30,701 70 47,782 30,701 54 35,000 14,635 36 The reason for the variation in parking ratio is because a portion of the buildings have a greater percentage of office which requires more parking. The developer has provided adequate spaces to meet the parking requirements under both office and industrial development standards. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: Project Description: (continued) DP- 338 -347 & Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 349- 353/LDM -8 P. 3 of -4 Access to the site will be from Goldman Avenue. The architecture of the buildings will be low - profile structure with a maximum height of 26 feet. The facili- ties will be constructed of alternating bands of smooth and split -face block. In addition, store -front glazing will be detailed in brown anodized aluminum and bronze glass will be utilized over portions of the exterior. Additional access to each of the buildings will be provided by either roll -up or passage doors. Traffic - Internal Circulation: Staff Comments: Upon staff evaluation of the proposed development, the developer was condition to provide a traffic circulation study, addressing internal circulation for the area north and west of Goldman Avenue between the eastern boundary line of LDM -8 and Maureen Lane. In addition, the developer was conditioned to provide a study indicating signal warrants for Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane where they intersect with Los Angeles Avenue. The City Engineer has received this data as outlined above. Thus, the developer has been conditioned appropriately to mitigate these concerns. The proposed development has been revised to reflect the site plan that your Commission has in package. The overall lay -out of the project provides for internal circulation along with a well - designed Industrial Park. Recommended Action: Make the following findings: 1. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approves the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State SEQA Guidelines issued thereunder and; DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 4 of 4 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 Recommended Action: (continued) 2. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of LDM -8. 3. Approval of DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 subject to the attached conditions. 4. That the Planning Commission hereby request staff to prepare a resolution of conditional approval for the Commission's adoption at it's next regular meeting of August 13, 1986. The decision of your Commission is final unless appealed to the City Council within 15 days. Prepare�c,�,• Exhibits: Diane Eaton Associate Planner 1. Traffic Study 2. Location Map 3. Plot Plan 4. Elevation 5. Mitigated Negative Declaration Y 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO 84 bf�- e -it . /I b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources YES MAYBE NO of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- al sites? — b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? C. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site near the AOF vicinity of the project? s YES MAYBE NO 41. MAMATORY PINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. es t project have the potential to degrade th ua ty of the environment, substantially redu th habitat of a fish or wildlife species cause i h or wildlife population to drop below se - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate lant or animal community, red the number o restrict the range of a rar or endangered plan or animal or eliminate portant examples of the or periods of Cali rnia history or prehisto ? b. Does the project have t poten al to achieve short -term, to the disadv to of long -term, environmental goals? (A sh t -term impact on ' the environment is one wh' urs in a relatively brief, defin' ive pe d of time while long -term impac will endu well into the future.) \ c. Does the projec ave impacts which are, dividu- ally limited, t cumulatively considerabl (A project impact on two or more separat resources ere impact on ea_h resource is \ relativ small, but where the effect of the �\ total those impacts on the environment is Sig icant.) d. es the,.project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to ` class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. I find proposed project MAY have a_ significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. Discussion Although the project may cumulatively have an effect on traffic, the developer is conditioned to contribute to the Los Angeles Area of Contribution to mitigate this concern. 7/18/86 Diane Eaton Associate Planner JAMES D. WEAK Mayor rT_)MAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tem ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY- SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer T0. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MOORPARK MEMORANDUM Dick Morton, Interim Planning Director Mark Wessel, Project Engineer M S w February 27, 1986 Review of Traffic Analysis for PM 4204, LDM -8 (Annotti) STEVEN KUE`.Y City Manager CHERYL J. KAN: City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chef of Police After reviewing the subject study, I have the following comments: 1. It should first be pointed out that although the normal approach for a study such as this is to conservatively estimate project impacts by assuming worst -case conditions, a slightly different approach is recommended in this case. This is because access for the industrial area in question, which has much potential for development, relies entirely on two closely- spaced streets connecting to Los Angeles Avenue. It could therefore be a mistake to continue development on the basis that conservative traffic projections_ndicate that a warranted traffic signal will eventually solve- access problems if the actual traffic volumes that occur do not quite warrant a signal. It seems that the conservative approach in this case is to find a different solution and not count on a traffic signal to solve the access problem unless traffic projections indicate relatively strongly that a signal will be warranted. If the projections do not give such an indication, and an alternate solution to the access problem is not found, consideration should be given to restricting development in this area. EXH =BIT "1 It 799 Moorpark Avenue (805) 529 -6864 Page -2- �. In view of the fact that the City Land Use Element defines the .area analyzed in the subject study as "Light Industrial" and "Medium Industrial ", further discussion is needed to explain why it was considered more appropriate to base trip generation on "Manufacturing" land use (ITE Code 140) instead of "Industrial" (ITE Code 100) or "General Light Industrial" (ITE Code 110). This discussion should include the relative effect on signal warrants. Comment No. 1 should be kept in mind relative to this discussion. 3. Consistent with Comment No. 1, it is recommended that the square footage per acre assumption of 50% be reduced to 45 %, based on a recent survey of sixteen Moorpark industrial projects that concluded the average development intensity was approximately 42 %. Again, it should be emphasized that this is not intended to set a precedent and that 50% is certainly not considered overly conservative for most cases. 4. Pat Perovich, of CalTrans Traffic Operations, has indicated that rural warrants may continue to apply in the future because the critical speed along Los Angeles Avenue is not expected to fall below 40 mph. She stated that this is of secondary importance compared to the overall volumes, however. Although CalTrans does not necessarily require that two warrants be satisfied, they rarely install a signal based on Warrant 2 alone. Our interpretation is that a signal would be warranted if Warrants 2 and 3 were satisfied, which would require that 80% of Warrant 1 be satisfied. This should be addressed when the warrants are reanalyzed. 5. The report should discuss the effect on the signal warrants caused by traffic that will gravitate to the signalized intersection, if one of the intersections is indeed signalized. If Maureen Lane is signalized, for instance, most of the traffic on Goldman Avenue wishing to proceed east could be expected to access Los Angeles Avenue via Maureen Lane even though it is slightly out of their way. 6. Trip distribution assumptions should consider that Tierra Rejada Road may be connected as early as 1987. Page -3- 7. There should be an estimate, qualified if necessary, as to when the internal connection between Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue will be needed. This estimate need not necessarily be a specific date, but may instead be based on the degree of buildout in the study area. 8. The report should address the extent of any delays expected to be experienced by vehicles attempting to access Los Angeles Avenue from Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane. It is anticipated that Los Angeles Avenue will consist of four travel lanes and a two -way left turn lane by 1987. Temporary mitigation measures that could be implemented in the interim prior to signalization of Goldman Avenue or Maureen Lane should be discussed. 9. If a signal is anticipated, there should be an estimate (qualified if necessary) as to when it should be installed. 10. If a signal is warranted, the report should discuss the advantages in locating it at one intersection rather than at the other intersection (Maureen Lane vs. Goldman Avenue). 11. The gap- creating effect, if any, of the proposed signal at Tierra Rejada Road - Los Angeles Avenue should be discussed relative to traffic attempting to access Los Angeles Avenue from Maureen Lane or Goldman Avenue. MW : j93 cc: Steve Kueny, City Manager R. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer Bob Warren, Ramseyer and Associates John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer John Wanger, Project Engineer Mark Annotti, Annotti and Associates JN 3752 CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-35-3 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 14,635 square foot ind is rial./manufar taring building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shawn A untie Assessor Parcel No 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIROM ENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, %qR , have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: Tnese potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposir with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the I A Area of rnntrih„r;nn Ar•r>>al _deposit shall be the then current A Area of Canrrihiltion analicahl rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) Approved by: (Date) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 9th of July , 1986, beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,, Moorpark, California, 93021, for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project herein below described. notice is hereby further given that, pursuant to california State Law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project would significantly effect the environment, and that, based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant effect would occur; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incomp- liance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Development Plan Permit Nos.: DP -338 - 10,400 sq.ft. DP -345 - 5,000 sq.ft. DP -339 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -346 - 5,000 sq.ft. DP -340 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -347 - 5,246 sq.ft. DP -341 - 10,614 sq.ft. DP -349 - 5,246 sq.ft. DP -342 - 10,614 sq.ft. DP -350 - 15,372 sq.ft. DP -343 - 12,240 sq.ft. DP -351 - 30,701 sq.ft. DP -344 - 10,800 sq.ft. DP -352 - 30,701 sq.ft. DP -353 - 14,635 sq.ft. Applicant: Annotti Associates Proposal: To construct industrial /manufacturing buildings as listed in the above entitlement. Location: On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No.: 511 -07 -42 N(1'TTrP Mr)fPTrF MOTTrF If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Department of Community Development at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone (805) 529 -6864. Dated: June 23, 1986 B Title: Administrative Secretar Proof of Publication In the matter of Fictitious buy -,mess Name No ,STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Vent ufa City of Moorpark I arri a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years. and not a party to or Interested in the above - entitled matter 1 am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Moorpark. County of Ventura, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Ventura. State of California. under the date of April 27. 1981 Case number SP49672, that the notice, of which the an- nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published In each regular and en- tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates. to -wit-, --- A5___ ____1 - IL K—k-- t _., 2 all in the year 19___S__ty I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Moorpark this a�_dcy of 19 Signature MOORPARK NEWS 724D Moorpark Ave. P.O. Box 775 Moorpark, CA 93021 40-ft MIP.-Cicotlyr.", At JUN 2 6 1986 City Of Maorpark This Space is fur the County C,lefk I_oonV Slanil NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HER BY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the CSalife P W . AC' M n o* ora. o1i�9 thpur o:00 p.m., in the Council'Cham 8 in the :Hall of said City,,,locat@d,at -,799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorp,ul�, California,, 93021, for fie purpose of co sideration of th@ proposed pre) ect`he%embelow described. 'Notice is hereby further.*iven:thatnpursuant to-Califo nia State mine ¢ w, fan; evalpatioa- n condwted to, dit environmentt,, a d p�je WOt t '' feet`t4e been fo�iad than t; •bhsea u uuEisl�rvle�rt -has a �' c�oukl r Oerefore„ to Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed incocp- .pliance with State EEQA Guidelines. issued tl>vekeil_tider. Entitlement: Development Plan Permit Nos : t DP 338 - 10,400 sgft. AP -445• -5,000 DP•339- 12,240 sq :ft - 't, tt' DP -34 12, *240 ft: - -- �_ --.1 DP- 346- -6 000 - ft. DP- 341 -10 614 _ DP4447' =3f 21�'szq.ft. sq.ft. DP- 349 -5,246 ft. -DP- 341 -- 16,614 sq.f -'"`.. �.... - .._r_.,OP"- 35n- I'5,372-s�.f>" '^P- 343= 12,240�sq.f� DP- 351 -30 701.4 L �P- 344 = 10,800 ft q• ' DP452- 3Uf;70 — ft Sim ffk Applicant, limotti 4a9ociates Prop060 Tto construct industrial/manufacturing buildings ap listed in the above entitlement. f . Location: 'Oi � Gutman Avenue "fJetvvtiert-jAairmeen ,are anj Shasta A46ue. t �r r Assempo F. Parcel No.: °511 -07-42 _. NOTICE t ' NOTICE ` NOTIC>t • 'If you chalienga the ProPosed.:6ctioa,.in,�Court, you ,-may b Ignited to raising only those issues you or someone else raise at the public hearing described • nQtice, or in T tten correspondence idelivered 10 tlj I�t of Commn teak Continued %, Poo 1ti= -V API`` Development at as prior to the public hearing, If you • have -atequesf or oounnents regarding . the Project. contact the Comnn u Sty Development Department at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any comnunts or questions -this pro, ict, contact the Communittyy t t at t: City Hall, 799 Moorpark Z� �oocpark, • orris 93021; Phone: 529 -6884. Dated June 23,1986 Celia-LaF'leur Administrative Secretary NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 9th day of. July 9 19 869 beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark . Avenue, Moorpark, California- 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that. based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been completed In -compliance with State CEQA• Guidelines issued -thereunder. Entitlement: Applicant: Proposal: Location: Assessor's Parcel No.: NOTTrF LAND DIVISION MOORPARK LDM -8 Annotti Associates Subdivision of land into 15 parcels. On Goldman Avenue between Maureen'Lane and Shasta Avenue. 511 -07 -42 NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the - Planningt Department at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529 -6864. DATED: June 23 , 19 86 . B w Title: A ministrative Secretary 1RA10' SEE ER AND ASSOCUAT ES • CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • June 18, 1986 A. D. Annotti and Associates, Inca 9010 Corbin Avenue #12 Northridge, CA 91324 Attention: Marc Annotti Subject: Parcel Map 4204 (LDM -8) Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Annotti: This letter was prepared at your request to supplement the earlier report made on January 17, 1986, and the subsequent review and comments by the City Engineer on February 27, 1986. The discussion herein is predicated upon a review of the earlier traffic data in light of the City Engineer's letter. Moreover the discussion herein includes previously unknown information that the City's Area of Contribution (AOC) includes a signal somewhere to the east of Gabbert Road. Trip generation rates used in the January 17, 1986, report were selected for two reasons: the ITE description of the land use (rather than the name alone) coupled with numbers of employees and building sizes was most accurately descriptive of this project, and the correlation coefficient (R) was the highest for the trip generation rate and independent variable, The trips generated using either Industrial (ITE 100) or General Light Industrial (ITE 110) are nearly equal, and more than Light Manufacturing (ITE 140). No other reason for selection of trip generation rates, distribution, or assignment was considered as shown in the report calculations. The January 17th study was made on land use known to be proposed for LDM -8 and in adjacent properties. If a heavier land use were approved by the city and trip distribution was different (i.e. to a signalized intersection) then it is possible that a traffic signal might be warranted. For example, if the trip generation was higher and 50% of the traffic expected to go to one intersection were now diverted to a signalized intersection, then the warrants would be met, and the signal would be appropriate. JUN 19 1986 icy of moo ask It is possible that alternate points of access will be developed as individual properties are developed, and before ultimate buildout occurs, a variety of travel patterns could be established. It is better to install a traffic signal on a four -way intersection rather than a T- intersection because more motorists will be served. Maureen Lane is a better choice than Goldman Avenue or Shasta Avenue. Moreover, the circulation to Maureen Lane with ultimate development is better and serves a wider area north of Los Angeles Avenue than Goldman Avenue. If a signal were installed on Maureen Lane, traffic from LDM -8 proceeding East would likely use Maureen Lane for access to New Los Angeles Avenue. If the signal were at Goldman Avenue a more central location, motorists would gravitate there if their des -ination is to the East, but not if they were proceeding West. Detailed time -delay studies, which are expensive, could show that with the combination of travel distance and estimated signal timing one location might be preferable to the other. LARTS regional transportation studies do not get into the kind of detail necessary for this analysis. The connection of Tierra Rejada Road to the south and east would have little effect on the majority of trips produced by this project. For example, motorists desiring to go to the Thousand Oaks Area could either enter Los Angeles Avenue and proceed to the freeway or they could move out of their way to Tierra Rejada Road to connect to the freeway. Only travel time studies using the so called "floating car" method would determine the viability of one route over another. Even with heavier land use than expected by our earlier analysis (ITE 100 and 110) and distribution to one intersection over the other, a signal would be inappropriate until 70 percent of the entire 45 acres is developed, and the connection between Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue should not be needed until that time as well. It is purely a function of the buildout of the area shown in the earlier report within the distribution boundary. Considering the lead time for constructing a signal on a state highway, the design and should precede the complete buildout by two years. Prior to the construction of a traffic signal there are few alternative measures acceptable to the State. For example, four- way stop signs are an interim measure acceptable to most agencies prior to the construction of a traffic signal. However, Caltrans dues not use this method. Temporary alternate access to avoid the connection to Los Angeles Avenue by either connecting to Shasta Avenue or Poindexter Avenue involves political problems and other land owners. The best solution is to measure the traffic volumes as each building is constructed considering what could gravitate toward one intersection or the other. If it is appropriate then traffic signals should be considered at the better of the two intersections. A suggested condition is attached. Assuming a traffic signal at Los Angeles Avenue, Tierra Rejada Road and Gabbert Road, platooning was considered at the intersections of Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue. Maureen Lane is approximately 1,450 feet from Tierra Rejada Road and Goldman Avenue is 2,430 feet -from that same intersection. Good traffic engineering practice shows that after approximately 1,000 feet (to a quarter of a mile) the platooning effect of upstream signals is gone. Therefore, the proposed signal at Tierra Rejada Road would have little or no platooning effect for the traffic using the two downstream intersections discussed herein. In conclusion, it is recommended that timely studies be made of this area as the buildings develop to determine the need for and location of a traffic signal. Moreover, the likely location of a traffic signal, if required, would be Maureen Lane because of the intersection configuration and the wider area served. Signals should not be installed until the majority of the area is built. Inclusion of a traffic signal in the Area Of Contribution fund is a prudent measure that sets aside money for a signal, but does not demand one if it not required. Finally, the need for traffic signals has to be weighed in relation to current and future Caltrans policies and procedures. Therefore, a suggested condition i.s attached. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. I can provide extra copies of this report for submittal to the City of Moorpark at your direction. Very truly yours, RAMSE R AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert E. Warren P.E. Registered Civil Engineer 19268 Registered Traffic Engineer 358 R E W : t t Suggested City Engineer's Condition The developer shall enter into an agreement with the city wherein it is agreed that development within the area served by Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue, north of Los Angeles Avenue (State Highway -718) shall not exceed 675,000 square feet unless, at that time, a new traffic engineering study performed at developer's expense, shows that traffic signals are not yet warranted at one or the other of these two intersections. At least two warrants shall be met. If the traffic study finds that additional traffic cannot be accommodated and the developer desires to develop in excess of 675,000 square feet, the developer shall construct a traffic signal at one or the other of these two intersections using a combination of money derived from his own sources, the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution (AOC, or its successors), and the State of California, as stipulated in the above agreement. The City will enter into an agreement establishing a reimbursement district whereby the developer is reimbursed for costs in excess of the construction cost for his portion of signal based upon the developed building area described above. If the approved traffic study, or subsequent studies, shows that a signal is not required at the complete occupancy of the described area, or if CALTRANS refuses to permit a traffic signal, then this condition is void, and money deposited by the developer in excess of AOC contributions shall be refunded. URIAMSEVER AND A SSOCUATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS - LAND PLANNERS - SURVEYORS - January 17, 1986 A. D. Annotti and Associates, Inc. 9010 Corbin Avenue #12 Northridge, CA 91324 Attention: Marc Annotti Subject: Parcel Map 4204 (LDM -8) Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Annotti: This brief analysis of the traffic and circulation relative to your project is offered in reply to your letter forwarding the City of Moorpark's letter of December 19, 1985. The City Engineer's staff requested you to supply a traffic circulation study addressing internal circulation for the area northwest of Goldman Avenue between the eastern boundary line of LDM -8 and Maureen Lane. They also requested that you include signal warrants for those two intersections where they intersect with Los Angeles Avenue. Your attention is directed to the five pages of calculations and exhibits attached hereto which will be referred to throughout this letter. Based upon a review of the area, we believe that the traffic tributary to Goldman Avenue will originate with: your project, half of the area between "B" Street and Maureen Lane, and the home northeast of the cul -de -sac on "C" Street. This area is 24.8 acres (net). The balance of the area to the west will use Maureen Lane for its access to Los Angeles Avenue. Due to the close proximity of the parcels in relation to Los Angeles Avenue, there is very little propensity for traffic to alternate between Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue. These two streets essentially operate as cul -de -sacs. To the north of LDM -8 is Tech Circle. There is no access between Tech Circle and either Goldman Avenue or Maureen Lane. The mini - storage area that connects to "C" Street does not gain access, except for emergency vehicles and therefore contributes no traffic to "C" Street or Goldman Avenue. Lastly, the 1.88 acres presently occupied by a single family dwelling unit at the northerly end of "C" Street is considered to produce trips as if it were developed as light manufacturing. Therefore, we believe that Maureen Lane will have 19.5 acres (net) contributing traffic to the intersection with Los Angeles Marc Annotti RE: Parcel Map 4204 Traffic Analysis January 17, 1986 Page 2 Avenue and Goldman Avenue will have 24.8 acres (net). Sheet 1 of the calculations "shows the areas contributing traffic to the two intersections described herein. These distribution limits and boundaries were determined from the tentative map and the assessor's map. Maureen Lane, south of Los Angeles Avenue, is a cul -de -sac serving 28 single family dwelling units of half acre size. These single family dwelling units will generate less traffic in either the peak hour or in the 24 hours of a day than the area north of Los Angeles Avenue. Therefore, the light manufacturing area is the controlling influence to this intersection. Trips generated by the two areas are from light manufacturing which is consistent with the tentative map and conforms to Institute of Transportation Engineers, Land Use Code 140. The assumptions for trip distribution and factors modifying trip generation are listed on sheet 2 of the calculations attached hereto. Sheet 2 shows trips generated at the morning peak hour, afternoon peak hour with the directional split, and the average week day vehicle trip ends (commonly known as ADT). As stated before each of these two streets, Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane, each act as cul -de -sacs. Sheet 3 of the attached calculations shows the estimated morning and afternoon peak periods at the two intersections. Our experience shows a distribution primarily to the east along Los Angeles Avenue with the balance going toward the west. There will be an insignificant number of vehicle trips attracted between the north and south legs of Maureen Lane. Traffic volumes for Los Angeles Avenue are taken from State of California, Department of Transportation. Page 4 of the calculations shows the requested traffic signal warrant calculations. Although these two intersections exist, the development of the properties is so incomplete that they actually behave as undeveloped intersections. It would be inappropriate to make an intersection count at this time because side street traffic would be minimal. Therefore, we treated them as undeveloped intersections as shown on page 4, a reduced sized page from the State of California, Department of Transportation, Traffic Manual. We have further assumed, since this is an industrial area, that all of those motorists who daily enter the properties exit in equal amounts. Therefore the split is 50/50 rather than some different ratio. There is no opportunity for through traffic, and the traffic associated with these intersections is generated by the sites themselves. From sheet 4, it can be seen that traffic signals are not warranted at either Maureen Lane or Goldman Avenue. Marc Annotti RE: Parcel Map 4204 Traffic Analysis January 17, 1986 Page 3 The Interruption of Continuous Traffic Warrant is satisfied for Goldman Avenue under the rural criteria, but is not satisfied as an urban intersection. At the present time, with higher speeds and the relatively undeveloped area of this portion of the City of Moorpark, the location qualifies as a rural area. However, as development occurs and the area becomes more built out, speeds will drop and the area will become urban by definition. Table I, Summary of Trip Generation for Signal Warrants at Goldman Avenue for Gross and Net Areas AREA (Acres) COVERAGE ADT* SIGNAL WARRANTS PERCENT GROSS APPROACH WARRANTED? SQ. FT. VOLUME (GSF) (ADT) GROSS 27.82 1 35% `424,000 11635 1 820 1 NO NET 24.78 50% 540,000 2085 1040 NO, By Rural (Gross less roads) Interruption Only * Based upon 3.86 AWVTE /1000 GSF for ITE Land Use Code 140 Light Industrial. Therefore, the traffic volumes show the signals are not warranted at either location. Finally, it should be noted that Goldman Avenue is approximately 2,300 feet from Tierra Rejada / Gabbert Road and 3,400 feet from Moorpark Avenue. Maureen Lane is approximately 1,500 feet from Gabbert Road /Tierra Rejada Road and 4,200 feet from Moorpark Avenue. Therefore, the signals at these two major intersections will have little influence on the two cul -de -sacs of Maureen Lane and Goldman Avenue. We have attached Plate B -3 of the County of Ventura, Public Works Agency, Road Standards that shows the proposed cross section for the streets within LDM -8. Portions of Plate B -3 were deleted to give emphasis to the relation of pavement with traffic volume and design speed. The design for B -3D is for minor commercial or industrial roads and has a pavement width of forty feet. According to this standard, a road of this nature could be expected to carry an average daily traffic (ADT) of 8,000 vehicles. Based upon sheets 2 and 4 of the calculations, Marc Annotti RE: Parcel Map 4204, Traffic Analysis January 17, 1986 Page 4 neither of these streets will exceed this criteria. Goldman Avenue, for example, uses approximately 1 /4th of the available volume and Maureen Lane uses approximately 1 /5th of the available volume. Based upon the criteria in this Plate, we believe the proposed roads are adequate to handle the traffic expected from all of the sites tributary to Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane. In conclusion, we believe the traffic circulation will be adequately handled by the proposed road cross - section and alignment. Moreover, we believe that traffic signals are neither warranted at Maureen Lane nor Goldman Avenue, and should not be installed. Traffic signals do not meet the criteria of CALTRANS for conformance to two traffic signal warrants. If you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. I can provide extra copies of this report for submittal to the City of Moorpark at your direction. Very truly yours, RAMS ER AND ASSOCIATES Robert E. Warren, P.E. Registered Civil Engineer 19268 Registered Traffic Engineer 358 REW:dh:954 Encs. ALBERT PRIETO Mayor JAMES 0. WEAK Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS C. FERGUSON Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY - SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk JOHN C. GEDNEY City Treasurer MOORPARK N1 E M O R A N D U M T0: Diane Eaton FFOt "I: John Wanger, Project Engineer DATE: December 19, 1985 SUBJECT: LDM -8 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney NIALL FRITZ Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police In reviewing the above subject parcel map for conditioning, I have previously noted it was inadequate due to the fact that pad elevations were not included on the tentative map. I had neglected to include i our concerns another important item. This item is that we it wi require the developer to supply a traffic circulation u y, addressing internal circulation for the area north and west of Goldman Avenue between the eastern boundary line of LDM -8 and Maureen Lane. Also in the study, the developer should include signal warrants for above Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane where they intersect with Los Angeles Avenue. If there are any questions regarding the above information please call me at your earliest convenience. JW:lb cc: Mark Annotti Mark Wessel John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer JN 37S2 RECEIVE© JAN 71986 RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA. CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 P. R. Z. DISTRIBUTION BOUNDARY v �tl 1lttitiitlllii1�i11111111 . goo ••• SUN Q �v �P co* iCll Z05 4114;ELE5 z 2 28 goy JOe I —W SHEET NO _ - -- / —_ OF _.. CALCULATED By — — DATE / �6--- CHECKED BY - - ------------- - - - - -- DATE _ -- — — - — SCALE - -_ - - -- - -- - - -- R V454resr /vvENvE J Q h A vEiti/ve RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 � \n 14 LL v u - " o� o� t, M JOB 1/✓' SHEET NO. 2 OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE _ SCALE /V14 7�,,a �G�v E� 77-0AJ • 35 °/a Cov���yE ��/1 -mss s � /p00 GrsG � = D, 93s % `� % ,64 7E.S 0.78 •0 7tis��- ,, �� �9 ��, ,�- - zN�,I-�,T) ° v le�,4 4 '2 //,!� � .--�- At/r-- A--.? % `� % ,64 7E.S 0.78 0. �3 D, 3Z 714 Z— (,4,97) Lortf - e i 24.8 I 540 2s-D�70 230 I X75 I ¢OS ZOBS /�1�JU,2�E•c/ l�A�lt' � i 330 ' �r�0 �o, 7S ��•� � �= 2 io 9zs�o, 7B `p,no = 200 I f RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654-1088 (805) 656-1874 100 72 .�,, 001 Zo 70 -'00' 450 goo U) 35; (,/411-) 2 95 05 11 /'60 J001 A Me //a xv 1"q t J -'� 1 '60% %4F '� Lam JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED By DATE CHECKED BY DATE .�Al r ItI14 z91S ,4 16W., 44t-&7744AIS OOOPIT -4400�IVMC r4616 7 lal ova 9670 4ae,7744WS A •��, ELF � � v,�N�E RAMSEYER AND ASSOCIATES Civil Engineers, Land Planners, Land Surveyors 1881 Knoll Dr. VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93003 (805) 654 -1088 (805) 656 -1874 JOB 1-1114 400 IX- SHEET NO CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY — SgrAL F 1<14 V" OF "V DATE / ,¢Di= 1,640 D j= 2485- V /¢O ,4OT = "-1,649 9-4 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 1>,4M • Flqu s-, C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS (Ros.d on Estlwreted Averovo Dolly Traffic — Sao Note 2) URBAN _ _ .._._..RURAL.._ Minimum Ro"irerments EAOT 1. Mininwrm Vehicular Vehicles Per for on major Vehiclespordayonhigher- Satisfied Not Satisfied streot (total of MProoches) both wfvo.orwiwoHStr + etapproach (ono direction only) Nwm6er of lanes for moving traffic on each aPPraoch urflaw Ravi Urban Rural Meier Street Minor Street 1 1 ................ 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680. ............. 2 or moor ........ 1 ................ 9,600 6.72D 2,400 1.66/ 2 or more ... ... 2 or more ........... 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 ............ - 2 of mar* ........... 8,000 5, 600 3.200 2.240 2. Interruption of Continvous Traffic Vehicles Per day .rt wtejer V.hicles P« der on high« — street (total of both volume wwnor- stroat approach Sati sfied Not Satisfied approaches) (ono direction only) Nurm6erof lanes for rmeving traffic on each approach Maier Street Minor Street Ur6an Rural Urban Rural 1 ............. 1 ................ 12,000 9,400 1,200 950 2 or more ........ 1 ................ 14.400 10 1,200 850 2 or more ........ 2 or more ........... 14,400 0.080 1,600 1,120 1 ... ........... 2 or more ..... . . . . . 12.000 8.4DO 1,600 1,120 /lDdolo.D, =/34�5- 3. C.orm6ination /v 4a Satisfied Net Satisfied 2 warrants V" 2 warrants No one warrant setisfied but following worromts fulfilled 90% or ,were..... 1 2 No T E: 1. Loft turn move+monts from the rmeior street may 6e inclr.ded with ruiner street volurmes if a separate signal phose is to 6o provided for the left turn movement. 2. To 6o used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot 6e counted. GATE _-- _ - - - -- -- -- /"V/ .c 57I/ — 0 9W �41-01)e4or• -1 //,#.1 /VG 7 S,4 7i"5- <' /6, �7it�• �T D 1© A ,�-� Y-4 /'/07 SAS /Sr�tO (sue TlS Fib �� PLATE B-3 REVISION: F- P w P Dr I. S W/2 F W/2 S-, I, FOG SEAL NO FLOOD' G COAT % �2%SLOPEI 2%SLOPE- URB & GUTTER PCC WALK AC PRIME COAT SS P MB B -3 A B -3 B B -3 C B- D DESIGN CRITERIA ECONDARY MAJOR COMM OR MIN R COMM OR IND IND COMM R r L64 PAVEMENT WIDTH, W(FT) 64 52 40 AN 20 YEAR�JWAN) 20.000 DESIGN SPEED(MPH) 40 40 40 30 ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: JAL i ! va COUNTY OF VENTURA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY aP ?// /t-? ROAD STANDARDS SECONDARY FREE ACCESS AND DIR.PUB.WKS. R 0 LADED: e<:2,eC78Z3g a 2 83 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ROADS Poi NDExTER SUBWVIStON � S SIR S � +MOORPARK 1 j UNION NIG" i SCNOUL- 1 r-iff-I A n n i 27 RS 1 a FREMONT TR 4 G� _ (j �rT� JI PM 6U < P' Y l' Illl 1 ��. - r 21 PM 33 ! PO; 40CX R N ��1� i --I-- -� 3 Mn 9 I L i SCI-001- I (- RS 79 1 O /. I 0 J� PM 'O i f i2T RS 52 , FR E - � H ¢ O 21 P to 3 5 Q I - I or Y Cr i � a - - o f - -- • I .� 1 0 r 1 O _ r �p,a^ TER SUB 1) ►vf =G� — - -t- - - - . - -- - -- TS �M F. ( Nwr 117 I - -IS 70 F ._ YT TR, 2 I 281PM 59 -1 i I o L— I I 1 " J' RS 92 a MR 39 15 RS � 7 RS 13 I y a t4 RS 1 I 4 \� FAA ti •s I ' - I 1 EXHTBIT Vr- City of DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 ,Moorpark (Annotti Associates) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF C >14MITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; I LAND DIVISION MOORPARK LDM -8 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Subdivision into 15 parcels. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Land and Shasta Avenue. S. Responsible Agencies: None. H. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMEN'T'AL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Comiunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, MXffMX)E= have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID EK)TENI'IALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the LA.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 - July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/17/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) FXH =B =T 1 " 5 '' CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; bevelopment Plan Permit No. DP- -3 3 cf 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 10,4eo square foot industrial manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of CoRmunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could,XOW, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. 2. 3. NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP- 335 Applicant; Proposal; buildine. Annotti Associates Construct aIZ,Z4o square foot industrial /manufacturing 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONIENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of CoRmunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, xxKXDdaM, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) Approved by: (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPART FM OF C 14- IUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-340 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 12,Z4o square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Conniunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, COMMMX, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED M AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (pate) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 1. PROJECT DESCR I P'I'ION : 1. 2. 3. NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP- 3 qt Applicant; Proposal; building. Annotti Associates Construct a 10 (,(� square foot industrial /manufacturing 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, XbX X&t, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECIARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICATTT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) Approved by: (Date) ( Name ) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION _MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Ievelopment Plan Permit No. DP- 3(42- 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 10,614 square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Loca t ion and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONS ENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, XJNCidWBft, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) ( Name ) ( Date ) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF OCNM[JNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-313 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a JZ,z(�o square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Commi.inity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, &MdXNM, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual _deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: I. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-3(44 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Pro sal; Construct a lo,soo square foot industrial manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, XW, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contrihution. Act>>al deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPAR71AENT OF CCxMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; bevelopment Plan Permit No. DP- 345' 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 5.000 square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, QpkxldxM have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: Th se potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID P0 !ENI'IALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L A Area of contribution Actual deposit shall be the then current L A Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Ievelopment Plan Permit No. DP--314 to 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a S trot) square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 S. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, XXXEW00 t, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) (Name) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTWNNr OF CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 1. PROJECT I)F_SCR I PTION : 1. 2. 3. NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Entitlement; Development Plan Permit Nn- DP- 347 Applicant; Proposal; building. Annotti Associates Construct a 5, zy 6 square font i nriilctri al 1manuf arturing 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, xmiUmM, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NIEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFEC'T'S: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 Approved by: ( Name ) ( Date ) ( Name ) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: I. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP- 3 ,q � 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a g,z46 square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 S. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of CoRmunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, {XxX, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant znpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of cont ihution- Actual deposit shall be the then current L A Area of Contribution app icahlP rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Narre) (Date) () (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPAFM -IENI' OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; "Development Plan Permit No. DP-35-0 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a Ib,37L square foot industrial /manufacturing building. .1. Location and Parcel Number(s): un yolaman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. S`I'A'I'FMENI' OF ENVIRONvE.NI'AL FINDINGS: An Initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, 400=X= have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution Actual _deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: I. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 (Name) (Date) Approved by: (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPAR`IIENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-3S-1 2. Applicant; Annotti Associates 3. Proposal; Construct a 3oOol square foot industrial /manufacturing building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue. Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 S. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: III. An initial study was conducted by the Department of Conmunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, C, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of contribution. Actual deposit shall be the then current L.A. Area of Contribution applicable rate. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Approved by: Diane Eaton 6/13/86 ( Name ) ( Date ) ( Nam ) (Date) CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF 0C1v UNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. 2. 3. NEGATIVE DECLARATION X MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No DP- 3 SL Applicant; Proposal; building. Annotti Associates Construct a 30,701 square foot industrial Imanti far t ring - 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): On Goldman Avenue between Maureen Lane and Shasta Av nnp Assessor Parcel No. 511 -07 -42 5. Responsible Agencies: None. I I . STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMErTPAL FINDINGS: ran initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, =RkdXi, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICATTI' EFFECT'S: (IF APPLICABLE) Prior to issuance of a Zone Clearance the applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L.A. Area of on ibution Artnal deposit shall be the then current L A Area of on ib tion apnlicahlP rate. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; June 25, 1986 through July 8, 1986 Prepared by: Diane Eaton (Name) 6/13/86 (Date) Approved by: (Date) Proof of Publication In the matter of ViCtltlous Hui fles5 Name'A,V n «•ril No �_Dm -S STATE OF (;ALIFORNiA County of Ventura City of Moorpark I am a citizen of the Uniteo States and a resident of the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above - entitled matter. t am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a newspaper of general crrculat:on published in the city of Moorpark, County of Ventura. and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County cf Ventura. State of California under the oate of Apn' 27. 198' Case number SP49672. that the nonce, of which the an- nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates. to -wit, a�- all in the year 19_ _ I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dat at Moorpark alifornia, this�� day of 19 Signature MOORPARK NEWS 724D Moorpark Ave. P.O. Box 775 Moorpark, CA 93021 C-4 7- �„ , n C mss..: �t -j' 6 Cirr C' i�^Jv4e2 ►k This r.,( the c<runt� (;lerk ti Frl�nq 51.�rnt NOTICE OF PUBLIC H 3 q EA"RIN 4, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearitg will h :e held before the Plannin Com mission of the Ci of . Moor- park. California, on W y, -00 9th day of . i 1986, b at the hour of 7:00 p.m,, in- the Council ben m the City► Hall of said City, 1o�ated at ?89, Avenue; Moorpark. California. 9302 for, the , Qk. eideration of the Proposed project hec�ein ego = . NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER, GIVEN. that;. t to California State Law, an evaluation has been co ucted to determine if the proposed pro'ect oonki signitic�nt�y.affect : . the environment, and that. upon as initial reviewe it has been found that a signii5cant affect would- not occur, therefore, a Negative Declaration has been in t lianoe with the'State CEQA G�ddeiiaea %ssu�uq n- Entitlement Land biviaion Moorpark LDM-8 1 Applicant: Annotti Associates 1 . I i 1�at�ion:' On Goldman Avenue nto •16 parcels -i between Maureen Lane and Shasta Avenue _ Assessor Parcel No.: 511 -07-42 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If limited toallea'g'e the Proposed action in Court, you may be at the public 0* those tames yon or someone else raised preorrspposppondenceh del P this notice, or is written to public hearing, tanning Department at or pIfc o� you a the or t@ the Hail, ?99 M Y Development at the City Phone: 629-6864. Avenue. Moorpark. California, 93021, i DATED: June 23,198¢ Celia LaFleur ` Y AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF Moorpark ) I, CELIA LaFLEUR , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on June 23, 1986 Monday , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NOS. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 ON JULY 9, 1986, TO INCLUDE LDM -8 by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark , California addressed to SEE ATTACHED Dated: June 23, 1986 Deputy City Clerk Mallery Dale, C- Shirley y 336 Shasta Avenue. C Leslies Pool Mart, Inc. 20222 20222 Plummer Street. t. - - - •• -�... ul I ►v- 4- drmeita Claffey Daniel, P- ROZilina ' r 711- PALCMAR AVE. � Moorpark, Calif. 93021 orht, Calif. 730 Sierra Ave � MOORPARK CAL. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 015 Book 511 page 07 Parcel 09 — — Book 511 page 141 Parcel 0� 511 Page 124 Parcel 065 Seely Bernard, J- Barbara A. ( Spencer Family Trust Flores Eduardo, L -Lilia 1Y� � B-ROSA M 337 Shasta Avenue. 784 Poindexter Ave. 750 Sierra Ave. E. 731 PAIl3R AVE. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 ( Moorpark, Calif. 93021 MOORPARK PARK CAL. Book 511 Page 135 Parcel 025 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 23 — Book 511 Page 141 Parcel 09 Book 511 Page 124 Parcel 075 7i ( Country Properties L.T.D. PH -II Ruiz Richard,Gr�elda. KINC'AID MAURICE Nunez Ramiro, G -Lucy S. Kimmel Jerome -Bryna 90 Shasta Ave. E J. 550 Los Angeles Avenue. 8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 730 DIABLO Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 MOORPARK, CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 015 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 32 — — , Book 511 Page 143 Parcel Bock 511 Page 122 Parcel 115 Jaegge Robin. P- Cathie L. Mann Family Trust. 9650 Calvin Ave. 01 Barnett Robert, I -Joyce F MASUN JOHN T, MA's WILLIAM E - �'1' Stenzel, David M- Yvonne. 163 Whitney Ave. 413 SHASTA AVE 287 Shasta Avenue. Northridge, Calif. 91324 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 �• 93021 Moorpark, Calif 93021 Book 511 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 33 Book 511 Page 143 Parcel 02 Book 511 Page 122 Parcel 325 Page 136 Parcel Barnett 025 Elmore Parke -June. Baker Curtis, D- Charlotte V CHAMBERLIN JR r„QONNIE E Kathyrn J. 5584 Birch View 30756 Passageway Place. 162 Shasta Ave. 387 SW= AVE, Lane. Camarillo, Calif. 93021 Agoura, Calif. 91301 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 MOORPARK CAL 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 035 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 36 — — Book:. 511 Pa Page g 145 Parcel O1 Bock 511 Page 122 Parcel 135 _ _ Thomas, S -Mar y E. Kimmel Jerome- Bryna. _ Hallan Eugene, G- Beverly A. GRINDER DONALD Shasta 237 Sh asta Street. 8255 N. Grimes Canyon Road. 163 Shasta ave. L- MARY A Moorpark, rpark, Calif. 93021 Moorpark, Calif. 93 par 021 par obrk, Calif. 93021 I 363 SHASTA AVE MOORPARK CAL, 93021 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 42 Book 511 Pa Page 145 Parcel 02 � q �._ White Ward H. ! Sustaita Evelmen, L -Edith L. Moorpark, Properties. 412 S. Havenside 141 Dusenberg Drive. STE. 10 Newbury Park, Calif. 91320 Westlake village, Calif. 91362 " Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 43 Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 03 Mundee Harvey K. Lee Herbert, P- Patricia A P.O.Box 2488 113 Shasta Ave. Paso Robles, Calif. 93446 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 45 Book 511 Page 145 Parcel 04 Moorpark, Stow -It Properties Corr alejo Q* George ATTN: Howard L. Hughes 1577 N. Dara 9665 Wilshire Blvd. Camarillo, Calif. 93010 Beverly Hills, Calif. 90212 Book 511 Page 07 Parcel 46 City Of Moorpark. ' P.O. Box 701 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 015 PAUMER STANLEY _ LWISE D ARqYAWS1A�5021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 035 FCBEpWSW S7EPHEN L- CARIA 291 W1 IMM AVE HO(WAMC, CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 055 VIIdAtAZM ROY M-NORA G 251 wRrn4E'Y AVE. MOORPAIM CAL. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 075 FORD PATRICK - H -M1ARY E I 211 {dirINEY AVE. MLOORPARK, CAL. 93021 I r r r `✓i7� >E�, e'p Ill 1L It: Lb ....,,...., -- -... 168 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 105 Hi99inbotham Ronald, E- Sharon. 210 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 115 Franco Arthur, Vera. 230 Shasta Street. I Moorpark, Calif. 93021 r Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 125 Magill Charles N. 250 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 135 Valdez David Abraham, Leticia Borboa. 270 Shasta Avenue. DH Moorpark, Calif. 93021 11 Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 145 r Valenza Samuel, Myrna Trust 290 Shasta Avenue. Oxnard, Calif. 93030 Moorpark, Calif. 93021 ' Book 511 Page 134 Parcel 155 Garcia Margarito, E- Frances P. 312 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Qti�/,G,C n�E yCA�✓d� �A1NE.e /�1� .a �:� au��u, �,0111C1111C. 213 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 136 Parcel 055 Hubbard Mario, Buena M. 187 Shasta Avenue. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 A.D. Annotti i Associates 9010 Corbin Ave. Ste. i12 Northridge, Calif. 91324 Boric 511 Page 134 Parcel 025 TAYLOR CCNLEY W -DORIS L 313 WHITNEY AVE. MOORPARK, CA. 93021 Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 045 GEPAM JOCE LYNE 271 WITNE'Y AVE mooRPARK, CAL. 93021 Bode 511 Page 134 Parcel 065 NEWS'r CM PAUL M-IiOSE MARY 231 WHITNEY AVE. mompARK, CAL. 93021 Book Sll Page 134 Parcel 085 R-MARY A 13247 TRIPCEJ STREET. S'YLl4AR CAL. 91342 bcocr- nomer, r -Linaa 5090 Goldman Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 09 S E C Building LTD. 5154 Goldman Ave. Moorpark, Calif. 93021 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 10 F.E. Finicial Service 92 Fleet Street. London, England. EZ4Y 1 DH Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 11 Moorpark,Properties 4512 Falkirk Ave. Oxnard, Calif. 93030 / Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 12 ( Moorpark Properties 4512 Falkirk Ave. Oxnard, Calif. 93030 Book 511 Page 151 Parcel 13 Sterling - Storage No 1 _ 7061 Hayvenhurst Ave. Ste. 200 Van Nuys, Calif. 91406 I DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 1 of-22 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot plan(s) and eleveations labeled Exhibits "3" & "4" except or unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1 (Light Industrial) Zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may; at his, discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. 4. That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification application, but any Major Modification is to be considered by the City Planning Commission. 5. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy of this building by any tenant, either the owner or prospective tenant shall file a modificaiton application for this permit. The purpose of the modification shall determine if the proposed use is compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of this permit. Also that staff shall review proposed occupancy to determine if the request will be a Minor or Major Modification. 6. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City Authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference become conditions of this permit. 7. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 8. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this development plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p.2 of 22 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Department and a building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 10. That prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submittted to the Director of Community Development and the Planning Commission for review and approval. the applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of use of this permit. 11. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. 12. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low -water using variety. 13. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 14. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 15. Landscaping (trees) shall not be places directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 16. That the final design of site improvements, including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 17. That all roof - mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air -cond- itioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of a zone clearance, the final design and location of the roof mounted equipment of the project must be approved by the City Planning Commission. DEVELOPMENT FLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS uP -336-347 & 349 -353 p. 3 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 18. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid fence' or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 19. That all utilities shall be underground. 20. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas. 21. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. 22. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch) exten; DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 P. 4 of; 22 t- 28. That prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any or all uses, the applicant must obtain approval from the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 29. That at the time water service connection is made, cross - connection control devise shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 30. That the continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City Inspector within thirty (30) days after notification. 31. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, a "Unconditional" Will Serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Water Works District No. 1. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 5 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: - All driveways to be 25' wide with 10' radius curb returns per plate E -Z-- 4. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right -of -way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition on any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD. LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. P• 6 of 22 8. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. 9. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 10. Developer shall obtain reciprocating access and drainage easements, as well as offsite construction permission, from all adjacent properties sharing a common driveway or paking lot. i DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 7 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF "S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 2. construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 4. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage- resistant covers. 5. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. 6. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width with radius curb returns. 7. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area shall be wide enough to keep the circulation moving smoothly. 8. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. Entrance glass doors are acceptable. 9. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 10. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 11. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 p.__�__of 22 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That access roads shall be installed with an all- weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus. 2. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 -feet 6- inches (13'6 ") . 3. That approved turn - around areas for fire apparatus shall be pro- vided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 4. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the public roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate(s) swing in both directions. The method of gate control shall be subject to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 5. That prior to recordation of street names, names shall be submitted to the Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 6. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 7. That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have 1 four inch and 2 two an one -half inch outlet(s). ° The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p._2_0f 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O Guide for 'Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2750 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. 10. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1500 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 11. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura county Weed Abatement Ordinance. 12. That address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure(s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 13. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 14. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The place- ment of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 15. That if any buildings are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 16. That plans for the installation of an automatic fire extinguisher system (such as, halon or dry chemical) shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review to insure proper installation. 17. That plans shall be submitted for any hazardous operation for approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention. 18. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or 5 miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance No. 14. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p. 10 of 2: Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO.! CONDITIONS 1. That the applicant shall be required to submit engineering data, satisfactory to the District, that demonstrates sufficient fireflow is available to all parcels. 2. That the construction of off -site water and sewer mains may be required to extend to the District's existing trucklines. 3. The district is in the early stages of planning a sewage treat- ment plant expansion project. Since the cumulative increase of flow into the existing treatment plant is directly related to the rate at which new connections to the sewerage system are made, the currently available plant capacity could be consumed prior to completion of any plant expansion. This could cause a delay in issuance of a "Will Serve" letter to the applicant to insure the plant expansion will be complete when sewer service begins. 4. That no new sewer main or lateral improvements shall be construct- ed deeper than 15 -feet. Is DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: t -- DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8 P. 11 of 22 1-7 1. That the conditions of approval of this parcel map supersede all conflicting notation, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Subdivision Ordinance, and adopted County Policies apply. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County, and City of Moorpark and any other governmental entity shall be met, and all such requirements and enactment shall, by reference, become conditions of this entitlement. 3. That no condition of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any lawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than on set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 4. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this entitlement are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 5. That applicant agrees as a conditions of issuance (or renewal) and use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or, in the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and /or attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action City may, at its sole dis- cretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation - under this condition. 6. That applicant's recordation of this map shall be deemed to be acceptance by applicant of all conditions of this map. 7. As of the date of recordation of final (parcel) map, the lots depicted thereon shall meet the requirements of the zoning ordinances and General Plan then applicable to the property. Compliance with this condition shall be required even if the zoning and General Plan requirements in effect as of the date the tentative map is conditionally approved. Conditional approval of th tentative map shall neither limit the power of the legislative body to amend the applicable zoning ordinances and /or general plan nor compel the legislative body to make any such amendments. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: nATF: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS FOR LDM -8 p. 2. of 22 f-7 8. That at the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 9. Prior to recording of the parcel map, the Developer shall obtain a "District Release" from the Calleguas Municipal Water District indicating payment of District's Capital Construction charges. 10. Prior to recordation, a "Unconditional Availability" letter for water and sewer sewer service shall be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. .1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p, 13 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 1.1 That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 1. That prior to recordation, the dev to the City of Moorpark for review detailed Soils Report certified by professional Civil Engineer in the The grading plan shall incorporate of the approved Soils Report. eloper shall submit and approval, a a registered State of California. the recommendations 2. That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: - Tejeda Street, "B" Street, and "C" Street shall be constructed per plate B -3D, with "B" Street being constructed with fill street improvements east of the centerline and 12 of paving west of the centerline. - All knuckles shall be constructed per plate C -4. - Cul -de -sac at the end of "C" Street shall be per plate C -3. - All streets shall have a minimum of 4" of asphalt. aThat in conjunction with the recordation of the (Parcel) Map, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark for public use, all the public streets right of way shown on the (Parcel) Map. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 14 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 2.3 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall.offer to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark access easements over all private streets shown on the Final (Parcel) Map to provide access for all.governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare. 2.4 That prior to , the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvements plans for access road from the to , prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete these improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the completion of the improvements. 2.5 That prior shall enter to improve of to , into an agreement with the the intersection of the developer City of Moorpark to improve the intersection and Road Standard Plate sufficient surety guaranteeing improvements. to Ventura County or better; and post the completion of the 2.6 That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 2.7 That in conjunction with the recordation of the Final (Parcel) Map, the developer shall offer for dedication to the City of Moorpark a street easement of sufficient width along to permit an ultimate right of way of feet, according to the applicable Ventura County Road Standard Plate , of the centerline of (along the entire frontage of the parent parcel) or (as delineated on the approved Tentative Map) . DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 15 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 2.8 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall.dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the City of Moorpark the access rights adjacent to along the entire frontage of the parent parcel except for approved access road(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Maps. 2.9 That in conjunction with recordation, shall offer to dedicate on the Final the City of Moorpark an access easement from to the developer (Parcel) Map to 2.10 That prior to recordation, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 2.11 That prior to , the developer shall demonstrate legal access for each parcel to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 2.12 That prior to recordation, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. 2.13 That prior to , the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Gabbert Road /Casey Road Improvement Area of Contribution. 2.14 That prior to the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Moorpark Road /Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Moorpark Road /Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the Building Permit is issued. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 16 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD. LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 3.1 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the Final Map to the City of Moorpark, a Public Service Easement as required. That prior to recordation, the developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. That prior to the submittal of the final Map, or a Parcel Map (containing five or more parcels), or any Parcel Map whereon dedications are required to be offered, the developer shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved Tentative Map together with a copy of Section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. written compliance shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark. 3.4\' If any of the improvements which the subdivider is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the subdivider does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the subdivider shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Government Code Section 66457. a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereafter "City ") in writing that the subdivider wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for such purposes as provided in Government Code Section 66462.5; b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (iii) a current DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 17 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD- LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the current fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report; C. Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the subdivider will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 4.1 There is some concern as to the adequacy of the size of the existing storm drain facility to which the storm drain facilities of this project will connect. There currently exists a retention basin on site which retains storm water from both on -site and off -site. Storm drain facilities shall be sized to handle all on -site and off -site storm water flows, including the existing water flows from Goldman Avenue, Tejeda Street, Tech Circle, and all of the property directly to the west to their final point of discharge. Therefore, prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 P. 18 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD. LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 4.2 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall delineate on the Final (Parcel) Map areas subject to flooding as a "Flowage Easement" and then offer the easement for dedication to the City of Moorpark. Lot to lot drainage easements, flood hazard areas and secondary drainage easements shall also be delineated on the Map. The subject easements shall be identified based on hydrologic and hydraulic methodology approved by the Ventura County Flood Control District. 4.3 That prior to any work begin conducted within the developer shall obtain a Ventura County Flood Control District Watercourse Encroachment Permit. 4.4 That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision will be protected from flooding. 4.5 4.6 That prior to , the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; enter into an agreement to complete the improvements; and post sufficient surety for the construction of in accordance with the "Walnut Canyon Study" dated October, 1980. That prior to shall deposit with the City contribution for the Walnut Local Drainage Area. the developer of Moorpark a Canyon Improvement DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p, 19 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD-LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 4.7 That in conjunction with recordation, the developer shall offer to dedicate on the Final (Parcel) Map to the Ventura County Flood Control District a storm drain easement of sufficient width to permit an ultimate right of way of feet of the centerline of the in accordance with the approval of the Flood Control District. 4.8 That prior to recordation, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that the CC &R's will include provisions for maintenance of 5.1 That prior to the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, an Oak Tree Survey prepared by a qualified arborist, landscape architect, or other professional specializing in the morphology and care of oak trees. The developer shall contact Bill Lockard at 654 -2036 prior to commencement of said survey. 5.2 That prior to , the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, an Oak Tree Report prepared by a qualified arborist, landscape architect, or other professional specializing in the morphology and care of oak trees; and shall be written in conjunction with an Oak Tree Survey. The developer shall contact Bill Lockard at 654 -2036 prior to commencement of said report. 6.1 That prior to , the developer shall annex the subject site into Ventura County Waterworks District Pao. 1 for the purpose of obtaining water sewer services. 6.� Prior to the recordation the developer shall pay all energy costs - associated with street lighting for a period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 20 of 22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: Mark Annotti APPLICANT: DATE: July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204 9,0 That lot to lot drainage easementsted secondary drainage easements shall be deline a map. Assurance shall be provided to maintned the iity that by these easements will be adequately water flows. property owners to safely 10.0 That the developer shall construct any necessary nch dr 9 be aina e facility, including brow ditch and slopolor(s) drainage channels, with a P ermanent earth tone c acts. Said color(s) shall so as to minimize andl auaroved by the Planning Director be submitted to PP as part of the grading plans. 11.0 That in order to reduce visual impacts, the off" shall construct all slopes with a rou and toe, shall blend graded slopes in withan natural slope a es, and shall also undulate and e vary earance of otherwise faces so as to break -up PP flat and uniform slope faces on slopes over 25 ft. in height. 12.0 An 18" slough wall shall be constructed directly behind the back of the sidewalk so as to reduce debris from entering streets. 13. If any hazardous waste is encountered during bee construction of this project, all work immediately stopped and the Ventura County artment, Environmental Health Departmen�tictor shall the Sheriff's Department, and he city Inspe be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: APPLICANT: DATE: DP- 338 -347 & 349 -353 p. 21 of 22 Mark Annotti July 23, 1986 CITY ENGINEER STANDARD -LAND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 (PM -4204) 14.0 A study of traffic concerns conducted by the Developer's Engineer and the City Engineer indicate that a traffic signal will eventually be warranted at either intersection of Los Angeles Avenue with Maureen Lane or Goldman Avenue. Because Maureen Lane is a four - legged intersection, the City Engineer has determined that it is the more appropriate location for the signal. However, the signalization of either intersection will necessitate the construction of a street connecting Maureen Lane with "B" Street. Therefore, prior to recordation, Developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans for a street connecting "B" Street with Maureen Lane, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements. The developer shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. Said improvements shall be required to be constructed along with or prior to construction of the signal. Subject to City Council.approval the developer of LDM - 8 may be relieved of this condition if, prior to completion of the signal at Maureen Lane and Los Angeles Avenue, a different developer has been conditioned and approved by the City Council to construct these improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The street shall be constructed per plate B -3D, modified such that full street improvements be constructed north of the centerline along with 12' of paving south of the centerline. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO.: DP- 338 -347 & 349- 353/LDM -8 p.22 of 22 APPLICANT: Mark Annotti DATE: July 23, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS - LDM -8 1. That prior to combustible construction, all weather access road /driveway, suitable for use by a 20 ton fire department vehicle shall be installed. This improvement, or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation. 2• That the access road shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer as having an lall- weather surface in conformation with Public Works Standards. This certification shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention prior to occupancy. 3. That the access road shall be of sufficient width to allow for a 40 foot turning radius at all sharp turns in the road. 4. That approved turn - around areas or easements for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 5. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (13'6 "). 6. That the private road shall be named if serving more than five (5) parcels. The street name(s) shall be submitted to the Fire Department Communication Dispatcher Supervisor for review prior to recordation. 7• That street name signs shall be installed in conjunction with the road improvement. The type of sign shall be in accordance with Plate F -4 of Ventura County Road Standards. 8. f That if the subject parcel is within a Water Purveyor District, water mains capable of providing a fireflow of 4500 GPM @ 20 psi shall be installed from the public right -of -way, or from the purveyor point of connection to the southwest c corner of parcel #1. property line of parcel #5 and the southwest the cost of engineering, installation and maintenance of these mains shall be that of the applicant of this division (Parcel Map). This improvement or provisions to guarantee its installation shall be completed prior to recordation 9• That prior to recordation, the applicant shall provide to the fire Department verification from the water purveyor that the purveyor can provide the required fire flow for the project.