HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1987 1007 CC REG ITEM 11B-- -�: . - -=--. -:=-- -7,
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
THOMAS C. FERGUSON
Councilmember
JOHN GALLOWAY
Councilmember
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Councilmember
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
MOORPARK
M E M O R A N D U M
ITEM
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
THOMAS P.GENOVESE
City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: October 1, 1.987 (CC meeting of 10/7/87)
SUBJECT: APPEAL NO. 16 - DP- 390 /CUP -4507 (Sig Friedman)
Background
The Planning Commission at their meeting of August 17, 1987
held a public hearing regarding the request to construct an
industrial building and use the building for automotive repair
and incidental sales of automotive parts. On September 8,
1987 the Commission adopted Resolution No. PC -87 -151
conditionally approving the subject entitlements.
On September 16, 1987 the City Council set the matter of
considering an appeal for discussion at their meeting of
October 7, 1987.
Discussion
At the September 16th meeting there was some concern by the
Council regarding the allowance of retail sales within an
industrial zone.
Section 8141 -1.3 Accessory__Uses., of the City's Zoning Code
allows for commercial (incidental) sales to a principally
permitted use so long as such is located within an enclosed
building. Also, Section 8141 -4.4 Conditional_ Permitted
Uses, allows as a primary use, commercial uses which are
intended primarily to serve the needs of the M -1 district and
are compatible with the permitted types of industrial uses or
will not interfere with the orderly development of the
industrial area. The proposed commercial sales area amounts
to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total building area.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
APPEAL /PCAGENDA
Recommendation
October 1, 1987
Page 2
Review the actions of the Planning Commission and take an
action as deemed appropriate.
Attachments: Resolution No. PC -87 -151
DP- 390 /CUP -4507 Staff Report
M0,ORP,4RK, CA[IF0R
Y Council M �4
of eeting
D-
'CTION: /Y. _ .198
By
APPEAL /PCAGENDA
RESOLUTION NO. PC -87 -151
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. 390 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 4507 ON THE APPLICATION OF SIG FRIEDMAN. CERTAIN REAL
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND
GOLDMAN AVENUE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 8163 of the Moorpark
Municipal Code, the applicant, Sig Friedman, has requested the City's approval of
its application for a Development Plan Permit No. 390 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 4507 for that certain acre site located at the northeast corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Goldman Avenue, and known as Ventura County Assessor's Parcel No.
511 -0- 151 -06, & -07, for the purpose of constructing an auto service center with
retail sales; and
WHEREAS, studies and investigations were made, and staff reports and
recommendations were submitted; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Article 5 of Chapter 3 of
Title 7 (beginning at Section 65300) of the Government Code of the State of
California ( "the Planning and Zoning Law "), the City of Moorpark has adopted a
General Plan, which plan contains each and every element required to be included
in such a plan by Section 65302 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Initial
Study and Negative Declaration on the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, this Commission, upon giving the notice required by the
provisions of Section 8163 of the Moorpark Municipal Code and section
65905 of the Government Code, did, on the 17th day of August, 1987, conduct a
public nearing as prescribed by law in order to consider said application for a
Planned Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act [Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California
(beginning at Section 21000)) the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark
approves the Negative Declaration.
SECTION 2. The findings contained in the staff report dated August
17, 1987, which report is incorporated herein by reference as though full set forth
at this point and as amended orally at the public meeting are hereby adopted.
SECTION 3. The application of Sig Friedman is hereby approved, sub,ect
to compliance with all the conditions attached hereto. Violation of any such
condition shall be grounds for revocation of said permit and any other remedy which
is available to the City.
SECTION 4. That at its meeting of August 17, 1987, the Planning
Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a resolution with attached
staff recommended conditions, as modified, said resolution to be presented for
Consent Calendar action at the next regular scheduled meeting. The action
with the foregoing direction was approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Montgomery, Butcher, Holland, Wozniak
and Lawrason;
NOES: None.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987.
CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
Celia LaFleur, Acting Secretary
IDING:
APPROVED AV0 CONT NT:
j c -4
7i�rector or trick J. Rich rd
of Qor6munity Development
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, at a regular meeting held
on the 8th day of September, the following vote:
AYES: Commissioner Butcher, Lawrason, Wozniak and Montgomery;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Commissioner Holland.
ATTEST:
i
Celia LaFleur, Acting Secretary
2
9/2/87
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
THOMAS C. FERGUSON
Councilmember
JOHN GALLOWAY
Councilmember
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Councilmember
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
Applicant:
Subject:
Location:
Assessor Parcel No.:
Site Size:
Floor Area:
Building height:
General Plan/
Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning/
Land Use:
MOORPARK
STAFF REPORT TO:
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
ITEM &. #60
Case No. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT N0. 390
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4507
Sig Friedman
6441 La Cumora Road
Somis, California 93066
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
Request to construct an industrial building and to use the
building for automotive repair and incidental sales of
automotive parts.
Northeast corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue.
511 -0- 151 -06, & -07.
.6 Acre
9,572 sq.ft.
19 feet, single.story
I -1 Light Industrial /M -1 Industrial Park
Zonis General Plan
North: M -1 /Industrial I- lIndustrial Park
South: R -1 /Residential Residential Medium Low
East: M -1 /Industrial I -1 Industrial Park
West: M -1 /Industrial I -1 Industrial Park
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
,.ease No.: DP -390 & CUP -4507
Applicant: Sig Friedman
Date of Meeting: August 17, 1987
August 14, 1987
Page 2
Site & Project History: Dec. 23, 1980. Ordinance No. 3572 adopted by the
County of Ventura established the current zone of M -1
Industrial Park. 19.82: PM - 3244 -1 approved by the
County of Ventura. This parcel map subdivided the
industrial area on the east side of Goldman Avenue into its
current configuration of eight lots.
Environmental
Determination: Negative Declaration
Issues: 1. Land Use
2. Design /Aesthetics
3. Proximity to residential zone.
Parking: A specific parking requirement for an automotive service
facility does not exist in the code. Therefore, in
accordance with section 9.13.090 of the Moorpark Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission shall fix the parking
requirement where a permit is required which may be approved
by the Commission. The retail and waiting areas of the
floor plan are provided parking at the ratio of one parking
space per 300 square feet of floor area. The other areas
are provided parking at a ratio of one space per 500 square
feet of floor area. Staff has reviewed the parking proposed
and considers these ratios to be adequate.
Proposed: 2,892 sq.ft. @ 1/300 = 9.64 spaces
6,680 sq.ft. (a 1/500 = 13.36 spaces
23.00 spaces
Provided: 24 spaces
Access: Access is proposed with a single driveway entrance on
Goldman Avenue. The project site utilizes the existing
circulation plan for this industrial subdivision. All
parcels are bordered by a reciprocal access easement, 25 ft.
wide. The industrial parcels to the east, north and
northwest will also use this driveway and access road as
well. Nothing restricts other users of the other buildings
further north from also using this access easement.
Architectural
Description: The Proposed building is designed in a contemporary
industrial architectural style. Material and colors
proposed are corrugated and smooth exposed aggregate
concrete, black anodized mullions, solar cool grey tinted
glass. Redwood will be used in the soffit in its natural
color. Tilt -up construction will be utilized. Several
different types of work spaces are shown on the site plan;
however, they are all part of a single owner -user business.
Case No.: DP -390 b CUP -4507
Applicant: Sig Friedman
Date of Meeting: August 17, 1987
August 14, 1987
Page 3
A highly visible location is created by the project site at
the corner of Los Angeles and Goldman Avenue. No other
newly developed buildings exist in this industrial zone east
of the Bel Air Sheet & Tube building presently under
construction at Los Angeles Avenue at Gabbert Road.
Therefore new construction at this corner will create a
prominent feature in this area. The design of the site is
very complimentary to its location. Extensive use of
variation in the building footprint takes advantage of the
corner. Visual relief is also provided in the use of the
facade materials, colors and textures. Landscaping and
lighting will also further highlight the building features.
Landscaping: The Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans recommends 5%
of site area to be devoted to landscaping. A total of 10%
of the site plan is devoted to landscaping. Although only a
20 ft. front setback is required on Los Angeles Avenue, the
project features a 30 tt. on Los Angeles Avenue setback; 20
ft. will be the front setback on Goldman Avenue. Extensive
use of mounding and berming will be provided. In the
parking areas at least every seven spaces a landscape finger
is located. Except at entrances to the building a minimum
of five feet of landscaping surrounds the building.
Lighting: A conceptual lighting plan is shown on the site plan. A
wide variety of functional and ornamental lighting elements
are shown. Soffit lighting, landscaping up- lighting and
post lights will be visible from the street frontage of the
building.
Signage: A monument sign in the Los Angeles Avenue setback is shown
on the site plan. Since a single user is due to occupy the
building, minimal signage will be necessary.
Public Improvements: Existing public improvements consist of concrete curb and
gutter, only frontage and the corner radius return, no
sidewalk presently exists.
Full public improvements of this project site will be
required. The Los Angeles Avenue right -of -way will be
required to be dedicated to 59 ft. north of the center
line. Integral curb and gutter and a five ft. wide
meandering sidewalk will be required as well. The Goldman
Avenue frontage will require similar improvements with the
exception that a conventional sidewalk will be acceptable.
Case No.: DP -390 & CUP -4507
Applicant: Sig Friedman
Date of Meeting: August 17, 1987
August 14, 1987
Page 4
Discussion: The land use proposed by the application may pose
some concern to this vicinity. The entitlements being
sought are a development plan permit for the building
itself; a conditional use permit is required for the use of
the building for automotive repair and incidental sales of
automotive parts. No more than 25% of the floor area of the
building is proposed to be devoted to sales.
The Moorpark Municipal Code grants the authority (Section
8141 - 1.2.13) for this application as an appropriate request
as a similar use to principally permitted uses as determined
by the Director of Community Development. The other
automotive uses in the vicinity have been approved under
this code provision as well.
Automotive uses have began to congregate on the east side of
Goldman Avenue. Two other automotive shops are located
further north. One is a body shop the other is limited to
automotive repair. A single family residential area is
located 200 ft. to the east of this site. The distance as
well as other buildings located between this site and the
residential will help to minimize problems of the proximity
to the residential zone. The major work area (service bays)
open to the north which will also direct potential problems
away from the residential area.
From a design perspective, open service bays and automotive
related work can be an unsightly view. The service bays
will be oriented toward the north and will not be visible
from Los Angeles Avenue or the residential area. The view
of the bays will face directly to the adjacent building to
the north only. However, most industrial buildings have
roll -up doors that are subject to open view to one side of
the building with a potentially unsightly view of the inside
of the building. In working with applicants, staff attempts
to have these doors located away from a street and away from
view of a residential area. In the case of this building,
the above criteria only leaves one elevation in which it is
appropriate to site the doors. Hours of operation are
proposed to be 7:00 to 7:00 p.m.
Case No..: DP -390 & CUP -4507 August 14, 1987
Applicant: Sig Friedman Page 5
Date of Meeting: August 17, 1987
Recommended Action
1. Make the following findings:
a. The proposed uses would be consistent with the
purposed, intent, guidelines, standards,
policies and provisions of the City's General
Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code;
b. The proposed uses would not impair the integrity
and character of the zone in which they are to
be located;
C. The proposed uses would be compatible with land
uses permitted within the General Plan land use
designations and the zones in the general area
where the uses are to be located;
d. The proposed uses would not be detrimental Lo
the public interest, health safety, convenience
or welfare.
e. The proposed parking ratios provided are
appropriate.
2. Approve the attached Negative Declaration as having
been completed in compliance with State CEQA
Guidelines. As part of its approval, the Planning
Commission has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the Negative Declaration.
3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution conditionally
approving Deve_l_m
o p ent_ Plan Permit _No. _390 &
Conditional Use_ Permit No. 4507, for consideration at
its next regular meeting of September 8, 1987.
Final Disposition: Pursuant to Resolution No. 86 -276, this is an industrial
development plan permit for a project of less than 50,000
sq.ft. and a conditional use permit. Therefore, the
Planning Commission has final approving authority, unless
appealed to the City Council.
EXHIBITS: 1. LOCATION MAP; 2. NEGATIVE DECLARATION;
3. SITE PLAN; 4. FLOOR PLAN; 5. ELEVATIONS.
CITY OF MOORPARK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
799 MOORPARK AVENUE
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MITIGATED NEGATIVE, DF.CLARATTON
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTIO_N_:_
1. Entitlement: Development: Plan Permit No. 390 & Condi.tional
Use Permit No. 4507
2. Applicant : - Sig Friedman
3. Proposal_ 9,847 sq.ft. industrial building for an
automotive repair with incidental retail sales of automotive
parts.
4. Location & Parcel Number(s)- Northwest corner of Los
_.. ._ ..... ...
- - -- -- - - - - - -- -
Angeles Avenue and Goldman Avenue. APSE 511- 151 -06, & -07.
5. Responsible Agencies:Cal.ifornia Department of
Transportation (Caltrans)
II. STATEMENT OF ENV_IRONMENTA_L_FINDINGS_:
An initial study was conducted by the Community Development
Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon
the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the
attached initial study it has been determined that this project
(could,) (could not), have a significant effect upon the
environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARA'T'ION ONLY:
These potentially significant .impacts can be satisfactorily
mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as
conditions of approval.
MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT
-- - - -._ _ ................. ...... .
EFFECTS:
1. All automotive repair work and storage of vehicles shall be
conducted indoors.
TII.PUBL.IC REVIEW:
1. Legal _ Not__ice M_e_thod:Di.rPCt mailing to property owners
within 300 feet. YES
2. Document_Posting_Period. August 3 to August 14, 1987. .
Prepared by: Senior. Planner Approved by: Director of Community
Development
ichael A. in &tric ichards
Name /Date Name/ D /1,
r
A U T
1 I
I I Q 1 I I
I ,
I
SIII 3 6 1 a cr II
IABLO AVE.Q N =1 I
R. 1 4 I I
- N PO T R -
>J W
— 0 40 41 42 43 44;. -, cD
zi
1 m �I
_ rn 32, RS
- yC
W _ \
/ I
ff
3 MR 39 II
II
II
I
?E RS 73 II
36 RS 74 �I
I�
City of
Moorpark
EXHIBIT 1
LOCATION MAP
DP- 390 /CUP -4507
SITE
PM 35
■
■�
-low
�
-
:
i
■
■-
SUN
■
■
�
NN
�
■ice■
■
■
rim, 11
■■
I■
a MEN
- N PO T R -
>J W
— 0 40 41 42 43 44;. -, cD
zi
1 m �I
_ rn 32, RS
- yC
W _ \
/ I
ff
3 MR 39 II
II
II
I
?E RS 73 II
36 RS 74 �I
I�
City of
Moorpark
EXHIBIT 1
LOCATION MAP
DP- 390 /CUP -4507
SITE
City of
Moorpark
EXHIBIT 1
LOCATION MAP
DP- 390 /CUP -4507
CITY OF MOORi'ARK
INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Applicant Sig Friedman
2. Project Description 9,847 sq. ft. Industrial Bldg. for Automotive
Repair with incidental Retail Sales of Automotive Parts
3. Date of Checklist submittal August 3, 1987
4. Project Location Northwest corner of Los Angeles Ave. and Goldman
Ave.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
1. EARTH. Will the proposal. result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes
in geologic substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or X
overcovering of the soil? —
C. Change in topography or ground surface X
relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or. modification of X
any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X
either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, X
or changes in situation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a river or
stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,
inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic X
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse
impacts on air quality in the project area?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Degradation of ground water quality?
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies?
j. Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
YES MAYBE NO
>C
X
X
X
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of
any species of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of
any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any
rare or endangered animal species?
C. Introduction of new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an
area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
resource?
YES MAYBE; NO
I
x
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal. involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand
for new parking?
C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation
systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and /or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental. servies in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
x
YES MAYBE NO
l). Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources
of energy or require the development of new sources
of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or substantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications system?
C. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
g. Street lighting annexation and /or improvements?
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
or will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL /HISTORICAL. Will the proposal:
a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic-
al sites?
b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known
archaeological or historical site within the
vicinity of the project?
C. Result in destruction or alteration of a known
archaeological or historical site near the
vicinity of the project?
YES MAYBE NO
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does the project have the potential. to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self- sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time
while long -term impacts will endure well into
the future.) n
C. Does the project have impacts which are individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate
resources where impact on ea.h resource is
relatively small, but where the effect of the
total of those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
III. RECOMMENDATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
_ In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find
with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact
on the environment.
I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to
class
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION, should be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
SHOULD BE PREPARED.
11
_ I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental.
Impact Report is required.
_ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified
Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing
EIR is required.
August 14, 1987
Page 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. 390
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4507
ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY
The following are responses to "yes" and "maybe" responses to the
initial study.
l.b. As a result of grading and site preparation, displacement,
compaction and overcoveri.ng of soil will occur. These are
construction impacts and will be short term. No long range
impacts are anticipated due to the necessary pr.n - construction
earthwork.
C. The site as it presently exists, is below street grade. To
facilitate construction of the proposed project elevating of
the site to street grade will be required. No significant
impact is expected as a result of this change in topography.
A flat developable construction site will result with
appropriate drainage facilities as required by the City.
2.b. Deleted.
d. The proposed project when considered collectively with other
project proposals in the City may contribute to cumulative
adverse impacts on air quality in the vicinity. There is no
present mitigation measure available at this time .inasmuch as
single projects are concerned.
3.b. The site is presently in a vacant condition. The proposed
project including the parking area will cover 90% of the
present site. This will result in a great increase of
surface area impervious to water, and will. increase the rate
and amount of surface runoff. However, existing storm drains
in the vicinity are adequate to accommodate the increased
runoff.
6.a. The primary on site source of noise generation is
anticipated to emanate from vehicular traffic. Some
additional. noise can be expected to result. from the
automotive repair work. However if the work is properly
conducted indoors no adverse impacts should result.
Residential uses are located 201 feet to the east of the
site. If the work is conducted indoors the proposed project
should not adversely impact the residential area.
August 14, 1987
Page 2
DE.VEI.OPME.NT PLAN PERMIT NO. 390
CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT NO. 4507
ADDENDUM TO INITIAL STUDY
7. New light and glare will be introduced as a result of the
proposed project. Illumination from signs, parking lots and
vehicular traffic will contribute to an increase in existing
light and glare.
However the location of the building i.s such that most of the
illumination will not directly impact the residential area to
the east. This is due to the location of a proposed
two -story self storage building (DP -348) to be constructed on
the property adjacent to this site to the east.
Additionally, the hours of operation are proposed to be
limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. With these hours, only
during the winter months will automobile headlight glare be a
problem..
13.a. Since the site is presently undeveloped, any new development
on the property would result in a significant increase in
on -site vehicular movement. Local circulation is such that
traffic from this site will be immediately dispersed to State
highway 118 (Los Angeles Avenue) and is not expected to
significantly impact the immediate vicinity. The type of
business proposed is more likely to have a constant flow of
traffic through the day, with barely discernible peak
periods.
13.b. A demand for new parking will be created by the project
proposal. However current Municipal Code requirements will
require a specific number of spaces to serve the proposed
project.
f. An increase in traffic hazards with respect to motor
vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians will occur as is the
case in any development project where the site potential is
intensified. Design features of the site such as setbacks,
sight distance requirements, driveway and aisle widths will
help mitigate traffic safety concerns and potential. hazards.
21.c. A cumulative impact will result with respect traffic.
The project alone is not expected to significantly impact the
vicinity or the City as a whole. However it will have a
cumulative impact when considered with other existing
projects and projects pending approval.
-CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 1
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
a. The permit is granted for the land and project as shown on the plot
plans and elevations labeled Exhibit "C ", "D" and "E" except or unless
indicated otherwise herein.
b. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M -1
zone and all agencies of the State, Ventura County, the City of Moorpark
and any other governmental entities.
c. Unless the use is inaugurated not later than two years after the date
this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that
date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant
one additional one -year extension for use inauguration if there have been
no changes in the adjacent areas, and if permittee has diligently worked
toward inauguration of use during the initial two -year period.
d. DELETE
e. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the
application are prohibited unless a modification application has been
approved by the Director of Community Development.
f. The design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities
thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of
Federal, State and County and City authorities, and all such requirements
and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit.
g. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be
invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions
or limitations set forth.
h. Signs are subject to the Moorpark Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 50 of Title
9. A sign permit is required for all on -site signs. Where there are more
than two signs on the building or within the complex a sign program shall
be approved by the director of Community Development. No off -site signs
are permitted.
No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or of
lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject use, there shall be filed with the
Director of Community Development name(s) and address(es) of the new
owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s), together with a letter from any such
person(s), acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of
this permit.
CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 2
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (CONT.)
j. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing
from that specified in this permit, either the permittee, owner or each
prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the execution
of the new lease agreement or the initiation of the use. A review by the
Director of Community Development will be conducted to determine if the
proposed use is compatible with the M -1 zone and the terms and conditions
of this permit. Said review will be conducted at no charge and an approval
letter sent, unless a minor or major modification is required, in which
case all applicable fees and procedures shall apply.
k. The permittee agrees as a conditions of issuance (or removal) and use of
this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the
City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or, in the
alternative, in relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City
for any court costs and /or attcrney's fees which the City may be required
by a court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its
sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such
participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligations under this
condition.
The permittee's acceptance of this permit and /or commencement of
construction and /or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be
acceptance by permittee of all conditions of this permit.
m. All utilities shall be placed underground to the nearest off -site
facility except through transmission utilities.
n. DELETED.
o. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or
requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or
orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than
one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence.
p. That prior to construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the
Department of Community Development and a building permit shall be obtained
from the Building and Safety Division.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED:
a. A landscaping and planting plan (3 sets), together with specifications
and maintenance program prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect,
generally in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check or
such other guidelines shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of
Community Development. The landscape plan shall be in substantial
conformance to the conceptual landscape plan. The applicant shall bear the
CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
August 14, 1987
PAGE 3
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED:
total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping
and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark.
- Landscaping along streets and at intersections shall not impair sight
distance. Low -lying shrubbery should be planned around intersections
so that a seated driver does not have to partially enter the
intersection in order to gain a clear view of oncoming traffic.
- Landscaping shall be designed as not to obstruct the view of any
building or office entrance /exit, windows, walkways or vehicles parked
in the parking lot.
- All landscaping and planting within paved areas shall be contained
within raised planters surrounded by six- (6)inch concrete curbs.
- The final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage
within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum
mid -day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50%
maturity.
- That turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought
tolerant, low -water using variety.
b. Roof Design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch) extension
of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof.
C. Pullover parking shall be limited to 24 inches maximum.
d. The applicant shall prior to the insurance of a zone clearance execute a
covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors,
heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be
subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including
but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City
may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic improvements
directly or indirectly affected by the development. Traffic mitigation
fees shall be used for projects in this Los Angeles Avenue Area of
Contribution, such as, but not limited to, the extension of New Los Angeles
Avenue.
e. Trash disposal areas shall be provided in locations which will not
interfere with circulation parking or access to building, and shall be
screened with a six (6) foot high solid wall enclosure with metal or wooden
gates. Final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of
the Director of Community Development.
CASE NQ_: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 4
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED:
f. The applicant, on behalf of himself and his successor and assigns, agrees
not to protest or otherwise contest the formation of any assessment
district or method of assessment applicable to the development which may be
established by the City of Moorpark for the purpose of maintaining
landscaping and improvements within the right -of -way of New Los Angeles
Avenue and /or Moorpark Road.
q. All property line wal 1 s and fences shall be no further than one inch from
any property line.
h. The building(s) shall be constructed employing energy- saving devices.
These shall include those required by the California Administrative Code,
Title 24.
i. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an
electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to
the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to
the issuance of a Zone Clearance. The lighting plan shall achieve the
following objectives: Avoid interference with reasonable use of adjoining
properties; minimize on -site and off -site glare; provide adequate on -site
lighting; limit electroliers' height to avoid excessive illumination;
provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the
proposed facility.
These plans shall include the following:
- A photometric plan showing a point by point foot candle layout to
extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines.
Layout plan to be based on a ten (10) foot grid center.
- Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be not more than fourteen
(14) feet in or adjacent to residential areas and not more than twenty
(20) feet in non - residential areas.
- Fixtures must possess sharp cut -off qualities at property lines.
- There shall be no more than a seven to one (7:1) ratio of level of
illumination shown. (Maximum to minimum ratio between Lighting
Standards).
- Energy efficient lighting fixtures which are compatible with adjacent
commercial lighting to the north and east.
- Minimum of one -foot candle illumination.
CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 5
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED:
j. A11 roof - mounted air conditioning or heating equipment, vents or ducts
shall not be visible from view from any abutting lots, streets or
roadways. This shall be accomplished through the extension of the main
structure or roof and not through individual unit screening. Requires
review and approval of working drawings by the Department of Community
Development to assure roof equipment is below top of the parapet.
k. A utility room with common access to house all meters and the roof access
ladder shall be provided. No exterior access ladder shall be permitted.
1. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance
for the purpose of determining compatibility with adjacent development
m. Develope shall pay all energy costs accociated with street lighting for a
period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights.
3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
SATISFIED:
a. An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service
will be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1.
b. The developer shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark
Unified School District.
4. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
a. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall
include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel
blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscape areas.
b. All landscaping and planting shall be installed and inspected.
c. No use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety
Division. In addition, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued until all
on -site improvements specified in this permit and has posted a Faithful
Performance Bond or other form of financial security to guarantee the
agreement; said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply
with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may be
resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required
improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development,
the surety may be exonerated by action of the Director of Community
Development.
-CASE 1V0.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No_ 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 6
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
5. AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
APPLICABLE:
a. Continued landscape maintenance shall be subject to periodic inspection by
the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground
maintenance as indicated by the City within two weeks after notification.
b. Dead or dying material shall be replaced in accordance with the approved
landscape plan. In addition, it shall be the responsibility to the
property owner to maintain tree wells adjacent to this property in a safe
condition and free from trash, weeds, or other debris and public nuisances.
c. All required yards, fences, parking areas, storage areas, operations yards
and other uses on the site shall be improved as required by these
regulations and shall at all times be maintained in a neat and orderly
manner appropriate for the CPD zone.
d. No outside storage of parts, materials, or merchandical shall be permitted.
e. All work shall be conducted indoors.
f. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.
g. Any violations of the above Community Development Conditions shall be
immediate cause for revocation of the Development Pland and Conditional Use
Permits.
DP - 390 ( FR iEO)VN)
irEM 8 6
C., lTY ENrswE-E-R Comorrloms To Sr Dr zrTrD
The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
evidence that this buildable site will be protected from flooding.
The developer shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard
to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. Per the City's
Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional
Civil Engineer or Geologist.
t-
,� (Z. The easterly driveway on Los Angeles Avenue shall be posted for Right Turn
and Exit Only. The westerly driveway shall be posted for Enter Only.
CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 7
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
SATISFIED:
a. The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and
approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall
obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing
completion.
b. The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil
Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate
the recommendations of the approved Soils Report.
c. The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall
enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the
improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete
curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, striping and signing and paving
in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards. The applicable Road
Standard Plates are as follows:
- Los Angeles Avenue to be constructed per Plate B -2A for north half of
street along property frontage.
Los Angeles Avenue to have meandering sidewalk, with the design to be
approved by the Director of Community Development.
d. The developer shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark access
easements over all private streets shown on the approved site plan to
provide access for all governmental agencies providing the publci safety,
health and welfare.
e. The developer shall offer for dedication to the City of Moorpark a street
easement of sufficient width along Los Angeles Avenue to permit an ultimate
right of way of 59 feet, according to the applicable Ventura County Road
Standard Plate B -2A, north of the centerline of Los Angeles Avenue along
the entire frontage of the parent parcel.
f. The developer shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction
of the City of Moorpark as follows:
a. Adequate protection from 100 -year frequency storm; and
b. Feasible access during a 10 -year frequency storm.
g. The developer shall deposit with the City the traffic mitigation fee. The
amount of this fee has not been established at this time. The actual
deposit shall be the then current traffic mitigation fee in effect at the
time the deposit is required by the City. This condition may be deferred
to prior to occupancy at the discretion of the City Engineer.
--CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 8
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
SATISFIED:
h. No storm water from a 50 year storm is to flow onto Los Angeles Avenue.
All storm water will be directed to Goldman Avenue.
i. The developer shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the
disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within
the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are
abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per
Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372.
j. The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into any agreement with the City of
Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety
guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and
calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after
development:
Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas
and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and
drainage courses. Storm drain systems shall be sized such that all sumps
shall carry a 50 year frequency storm, all catch basins on continuous
grades shall carry a 10 year storm, and all culverts shall carry a 100 year
frequency storm.
k. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along
with the grading plan.
1. The developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval,
evidence that this buildable site will be protected from flooding.
m. The developer shall have prepared a geotechnical investigation with regard
to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. Per the City's
Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional
Civil Engineer or Geologist.
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY:
a. In the event of the unforeseen encounter of subsurface materials suspected
to be of an archaeological or paleontological nature, all grading or
excavation shall cease in the immediate area, and the find left untouched
until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever
is appropriate, is contacted and called in to evaluate and make
recommendations as to disposition, mitigation and /or salvage. The
developer shall be liable for costs associated with the professional
investigation.
b. Prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right -of -way,
the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate
Agency.
CASE-NO:: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 9
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
CITY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS
3. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
a. The easterly driveway on Los Angeles Avenue shall be posted for Right Turn
and Exit Only. The westerly driveway shall be posted for Enter Only.
b. Developer shall pay all energy costs associated with street lighting for a
period of one year from the initial energizing of the street lights.
c. Developer shall pay for the installation of all street light fixtures as
directed by the City Engineer.
-CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 10
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
SATISFIED.
a. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground
from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a
minimum of one foot candle of lighting. Fixtures shall be weather and
breakage resistant.
b. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window.
C. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking
lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another
moving vehicle or pedestrian.
d. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead
lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level.
e. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street.
f. Monument signs shall not block the view of a seated driver when exiting the
station from another vehicle or pedestrian.
g. All entrance /exit driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width.
h. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and
3/4- inches thick or of metal construction. Front glass doors commonly used
for entry are acceptable but should be visible to the street.
i. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler
operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a
minimum of 1 -inch deadbolt.
j. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and
windows and to any roof vnets or other roof openings where access may be
made.
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY:
a. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or
a 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be erected around the construction
site.
b. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during
non - working hours.
3. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED.
a. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and
mounted against a contrasting color.
b. Address numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated
during the hours of darkness.
.C-ASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 11
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL
BE SATISFIED.
a. The applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire
Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing
hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development.
b. That building plans of all "H" occupancies shall be submitted to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
c. That if any building(s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler
system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review.
d. That any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and /or 5 miles
from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler
system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance #14.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE
SATISFIED
a. The minimum fire flow required shall be determined by the type of building
construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls and fire protection
devices provided, as specified by the I.S.O. Guide for Determining
Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required
fire low is approximately 1500 gallons per minute. The applicant shall
verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the
project.
3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY:
a. Fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible
construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County
Waterworks Manual.
- Each hydrant shall be a 6 -inch wet barrel design and shall have one
4 -inch and two 2 -1/2 -inch outlet(s).
- The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi
residual pressure.
- Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that
no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any hydrant.
- Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center.
-CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No. 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 12
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
4. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
a. A minimum individual hydrant flow of 1250 gallons per minute shall be
provided at this location.
b. Address numbers, a minimum of 6 inches high, shall be installed prior to
occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background, and shall be
readily visible at night.
C. Fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire
Protection Association, Pamphlet #10. The placement of extinguishers shall
be reviewed by the Fire Department Bureau.
d. Permits shall be obtained for storage, handling and dispensing flammable or
combustrible liquids.
CASE NO.: Development Plan Permit No. 390 August 14, 1987
Conditional Use Permit No_ 4507
APPLICANT: Sig Friedman PAGE 13
DATE OF MEETING: August 17, 1987
VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED.
a. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this
project all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County
Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's
Department and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work
shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies.
11,&
CITY OF MOORPARK
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEETING: OCTOBER 7, 19B7.
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #4507
DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT #390
HONORABLE MEMBERS:
IN AN ATTEMPT TO CLARIFY MY USE OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
AT THE CORNER OF GOLDMAN AND LOS ANGELES AVENUE, I SUBMIT
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
CONTRARY TO THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY MR. COLIN VALAZQUEZ,
I INTEND TO BUILD AND OPERATE A AUTO REPAIR AND SERVICE CENTER
WITH MACHINE SHOP AND INCIDENTAL PARTS SALES.
APPARENTLY THE CAUSE FOR CONCERN RELATES TO THE INCIDENTAL
PARTS SALES. A CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF A SIMILAR BUSINESS THAT I
HAVE SUCCESSFULLY OPERATED SINCE 1972, PROVIDES A GENERAL OVER-
VIEW OF THE VARIOUS SALES AREAS.
I SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING PERCENTAGE INFORMATION FOR YOUR
CONSIDERATION:
25%
OF
PROJECTED
GROSS
SALES
= MACHINE SHOP
25%
OF
PROJECTED
GROSS
SALES
= LABOR
40%
OF
PROJECTED
GROSS
SALES
= INTERNAL PARTS CONSUMPTION
10%
OF
PROJECTED
GROSS
SALES
= INCIDENTAL PARTS SALES.
I HAVE BEEN IN THIS BUSINESS FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS AND FEEL
THAT IN THE MOORPARK LOCATION, THE PROJECTION OF 10% IN THE
INCIDENTAL PARTS SALES MAY BE AMBITIOUS.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
SIGMUND FRIEDMAN