HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1989 0517 CC REG ITEM 11G MOORPARK ITEM 11 • Gr.
ELOISE BROWN apPK c4�,� STEVEN KUENY
Mayor o0 ��9 City Manager
BERNARDO M. PEREZ � o CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern � . . City Attorney
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. `�4' � PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember o o Director of
PAUL LAWRASON 9°% i Community Development
Councilmember R.R. DENNIS DELZEIT
SCOTT MONTGOMERY City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE
RICHARD T. HARE Chief of Police
City Treasurer
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE: May 12, 1989
SUBJECT: ITEM 11.G. - CONSIDER PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH PBR FOR
PREPARATION OF CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSOCIATED
DOCUMENTS
The item has been previously provided to the Council by the Director of
Community Development. In the event that you have any questions
concerning that agreement, they should be referred to Pat Richards.
This agenda item should not be acted upon unless the Council intends to
approve the agreement with Carlsberg under agenda item 11.H.
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of _0'7 198
AC T19 Nifirery1/414,9RA
fin - : 424.0C(zd�e,L
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWNQpPK � STEVEN KUENY
Mayor oo �=k9 City Manager
BERNARDO M. PEREZ FCHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern x<4 City Attorney
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. "AWN" A PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember o m Director of
PAUL LAWRASON %V7 ��" Community Development
Councilmember &.. J`o' R. DENNIS DELZEIT
SCOTT MONTGOMERY City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE
RICHARD T. HARE Chief of Police
City Treasurer
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: May 10, 1989
SUBJECT: CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN
Background
The City Council at their meeting of February 15, 1989 considered the
selection of a Planning Consultant to accomplish the Carlsberg Specific
Plan and related Environmental Impact Report.
At the Council's March 15, 1989 meeting ft was agreed to accept staff's
cost estimate and direction given to finalize the contract with PBR.
Since that time staff has reviewed two revisions of the Carlsberg contract
from PBR. No substantial changes have occurred between PBR's original
proposal and the final contract before the Council at this time.
PBR CONTRACT
The contract prepared is generally the same as those used for other
professional service contracts. There are however a few changes that staff
wishes to alert. the Council. First, under the subject of "compensation to
PBR" there is very clear language that states if the scope of work should
change through this process there will be requests for additional funds
from PBR. Second, where there is any conflict of interpretation the City's
RFP will take precedence. Third, there has been an added Section Q (page
6) that would obligate the City to arbitration related to any breach of
this agreement.
The Exhibit "A" attachment to the agreement includes all the listed tasks
of the City's RFP. There are areas where tasks have been combined or
changed in time in order to work within PBR's Phase Work Schedule. The
Exhibit "A" follows the same outline as PBR's response to the RFP with a
"purpose" statement, "Task Outline" and then what "Products" would be
created during the phase. The majority of the work phases related to the
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
crisbg:p3r/cr_l
Page 2
Specific Plan document are contained in Phase 1 through 6. Phase 7 is the
preparation of the environmental impact report. Although the Exhibit "A"
does not specifically identify compliance with AB 3180 the mitigation
monitoring program, PBR has stated that the EIR will include this latest
requirement of State law. Before the final contract copy is signed this
subject needs to be included.
Staff Recommendation
1. That the City Council approve the proposed contract with PBR and
authorize the Mayor to sign the contract on behalf of the City;
2. That the City Council direct staff to send the letter to proceed to
PBR after the initial deposit amount has been paid by Carlsberg and
the agreement between the City and Carlsberg has been signed by both
parties.
Attachment: Proposed PBR Contract - Carlsberg Financial Group
crlsbg:pjr/crl
// 4!�
DISCUSSION OUTLINE
PBR SCOPE OF WORK VS RFP
PHASE 3. MARKET ANALYSIS: (page 11 of the agreement)
B. Revise: "Conduct physical site inspections of
surrounding area (5 mile radius of the Property) and document
nature, scope, and characteristics of surrounding development
to identify the market."
D. Revise: "Review and document all planned and
proposed projects (exclusive of those included in the
Moorpark General Plan Update) in the entitlement stage
(having at least a draft EIR at the time of analysis if
present zoning is not compatible with proposed project) in
the City of Moorpark and with in a five (5) mile radius of
the project."
E. Revise: "Prepare estimates of s: _ ply (approved
projects) and demand for commercial and industrial property
with in a five (5) mile radius of the project. Demand should
be expressed in terms of annual absorption for the next ten
(10) years."
G. R'r'_NA and RHP -M ?, whit'_: is it? or should it be both?
PHASE 4. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVE PT-A S . (page 12 )
C. Revise: "Prepare an alternative plan including the
following elements requested by the City in the RFP. Propose
modifications res:Dcnsive to the issues identified in the
previous phases. moist items- through 7. Question of fact
Was item 5 four or ten acres, see 8771 (four acres pace 3
item D)
G. Substitute the phrase "City ,-'Consultant /Carlsberg"
for "city"
H. Delete the word "city" as joint review is
anticipated
I. combine with J. "Conduct a joint
City /Consultant /Carlsberg meeting to review revisions and to
Select a final plan from the individual alternative or a
combination of elements from differing alternatives."
Te`l&�7 "I 1'4-c
Page 2 - continued
?SASE h. PREPARE SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT: !page i51
A. Product Components; items; 5 (f) & (g) should be
a separate item titled as follows:
"7. Component Review:
a. Conduct a point CityiConsultant:'Carisbera
review session to critique the Product
Components.
b. Modify the Ccmpcnents, as
required, based upon comments -enerated at the
review session. "
3. 5. 7:eview of screencheck s= Decific -'an and (.-raft.
Revise a. & b.,; de-le-le " .._ty and insert
"City and Carlsberg"
Revise c.; delete "city staff comments" and
insert "comments"
Delete Page 21 (duplicate of .gage 20) and renumber .
PHASE 9. P�3LIC REVIEW SESSION: (page
E. Revise to provide for review with both "City staff
and Carlsberg"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Y: * * * * r'*