Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES CC 2014 3279 2014 0305 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-3279 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (IPD/DP) PERMIT NO. 300 TO CONSTRUCT A TWO- LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE CONTAINING 206 PARKING SPACES TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR OFFICE USE AT 5898 CONDOR DRIVE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ON THE APPLICATION OF WALLACE WONG ON BEHALF OF MCKENTLY MALAK ARCHITECTS, INC. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on proposed Modification No. 2 to Industrial Planned Development (IPD/DP) Permit No. 300 on the application of Wallace Wong for construction of a two level parking structure containing 206 parking spaces to allow sufficient parking for the building to be converted to office use located at 5898 Condor Drive; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held on March 5, 2014, the City Council considered the agenda report and any supplements thereto and any written public comments; opened the public hearing, took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal, closed the public hearing, and reached a decision on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director's determined that this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 - In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that the project is consistent with the applicable general and specific plan designation and all applicable general and specific plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations; the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No further environmental documentation is required. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Resolution No. 2014-3279 Page 2 SECTION 1 . ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: The City Council concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 - In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines) in that the project is consistent with the applicable general and specific plan designation and all applicable general and specific plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. No further environmental documentation is required. SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code Section 17.44.030: A. The site design, including structure location, size, height, setbacks, massing, scale, architectural style and colors, and landscaping is consistent with the provisions of the City's General Plan, and Title 17 of the Municipal Code in that all applicable standards of these plans and regulations would be met by the proposed development and the design of the parking structure. B. The site design would not create negative impacts on or impair the utility of the neighboring properties, structures or uses in the surrounding area as the proposed structure is compatible in design with surrounding buildings and land uses and; the circulation system provides for logical connections between the surface parking and the parking structure, both located on the same property. C. The proposed use is compatible with the existing and permitted uses in the surrounding area and the parking structure is intended to supplement the parking needs of the office building on the same property. SECTION 3. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves Modification No. 2 to Industrial Planned Development (IPD/DP) Permit No. 300, subject to the special and standard Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A (Special and Standard Conditions of Approval), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Resolution No. 2014-3279 Page 3 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2014. . . e S. Parvin, ayor at( C. ATTEST: QQ��' 010NA Ilit4rOk?-) Maureen Benson, City Clerk / w° { '4�7tED JVy Exhibit A - Special and Standard Conditions of Approval for Modification No. 2 to Industrial Planned Development (IPD/DP) Permit No. 300 Resolution No. 2014-3279 Page 4 EXHIBIT A SPECIAL AND STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (IPD/DP) PERMIT NO. 300 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant shall comply with Standard Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions and Planned Development Permits as adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2009-2799 (Exhibit A), except as modified by the following Special Conditions of Approval. In the event of conflict between a Standard and Special Condition of Approval, the Special Condition shall apply. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall submit samples of the colors, materials and textures to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Paint colors are subject to final approval in the field by the Community Development Director prior to painting the structure. 2. The applicant shall submit a sample of the metal vine trellises to be installed in wall panels on the north, south, and west elevations, the sample metal trellis material must be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The vines to be planted on the metal trellises along the wall panels on the north, south, and west elevations must be a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon in size and the applicant shall submit a plan which includes the vine species and amount and number of vines to be planted for review and approval by the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan that indicates that the trees in the front yard setback between Condor Drive and the parking structure must be a minimum of thirty-six inch box in size with the final species on the plan to be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The metal trellises and all landscaping plant materials associated with a landscaping plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director for the parking Resolution No. 2014-3279 Page 5 structure project, must be installed prior to the final occupancy and use of the parking structure. 6. A decorative 6-foot high fence is required on top of or adjacent to the existing retaining wall at the southern property line. The applicant shall submit a fence plan for the site to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the parking structure, and the fence must be installed prior to final occupancy and use of the parking structure. The Director shall consult with the School District prior to making a decision. 7. The applicant shall submit a lighting plan for the illumination of the internal and external areas of the parking structure, and the plan must be reviewed and approved by the City's lighting consultant, Community Development Director and Police Chief prior to issuance of building permits for the parking structure. 8. The lighting plan must demonstrate that the illumination for security purposes within the parking structure must be no less than Six (6) Foot Candles on the pavement, with a uniformity ratio of four to one (4:1), average to minimum; and vertical luminance must also be no less than 0.6 Foot Candles at five (5) feet above the ground and review; and the lighting plan must light the exterior of the facility in such a fashion as to prevent disabling glare upon entry and exit to the structure. 9. The light poles on the top level of the parking structure must not exceed a maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. 10. A pedestrian connection must be provided from the staircase area at the northeast and southeast corner of the parking structure to the office building and the pedestrian connection must be included on the plans for the review and approval of the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 11 . None of the prohibited plants indicated in the Provisionally Acceptable Plant List and the Invasive and Prohibited Plant List contained in the City's Landscape Standards and Guidelines shall be used on any property within the development site or the adjacent public or private right-of-way. 12. All other conditions of approval of City Council Resolution No. 84-73 shall continue to apply, except as revised herein. 13. All other conditions of approval of Administrative Permit No. 2006-12 shall continue to apply, except as revised herein. Resolution No. 2014-3279 Page 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Maureen Benson, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2014-3279 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of March, 2014, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mikos, Pollock, Van Dam, and Mayor Parvin NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Millhouse ABSTAIN: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 10th day of March, 2014. Maureen Benson, City Clerk (seal) k+11, `Irk Q9grE0 i 1