The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0207 CC REG ITEM 08L ITEM 8 _ L . RESOLUTIO'. NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CI"IY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM AS ADEQUATE FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. 348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1, INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Whereas, at a duly notice public hearing on January 17, 1990, the City Council considered the application filed by A to Z Self-Storage requesting approval to conduct a broker-referral service for rental trucks and trailers; the sale of packaging materials; the installation of copy/fax machine for office use; and Sunray operation on the subject property located north of Los Angeles Avenue approximately 210 feet east of Goldman Avenue. Whereas, the City Counc; l after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report dated January 17, 1990 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration has round that the subject property with the revised proposals (pg. 3, staff rel:ort of January 3, 1990) will not have a significant effect on the environmf t and has reached its decision in the matter, and Whereas, the Planning ommission held a public hearing on December 4, 1989 and December 20, 1989, adopted Resolution No. PC-89-206, recommending that the City Council ieny Development Permit No. DP-348 Major Modification No. 1 based on the indings contained in the staff report dated December 4, 1989. Whereas, at its meeting if January 17, 1990, the city Council opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify, closed the public hear g. and directed staff to prepare a resolution for the city Council's c , rision; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CI ! ( OUWII. OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOW Section 1. The City c uracil finds and determines as follows: A. Development Plan Pe nit No. DP-348 Major Modification No.1 is considered a "l oje :t" pursuant to the terms of the . California Environmf tal Quality Act. B. A Mitigated Negativ, Declaration has been prepared for this project and notice .3s leen provided to the public through direct mailing to o , err of property within 300 feet of the project site and tl iug l th publication of a notice in a newspaper of genera 'ir-uiation in the area affected by the proposed project C. Whereby, the City ( the City of Moorpark has considered evidence 1''esented by the Director of Community Development and other `ut~rest_u parties with respect to the subject Mitigated meg -iv.' re'.laration' D. The City Council ha . 'vo]uatc \ the proposed final Mitigated Negative Declarat`on n'| Yip determined it to be adequate and complete. Section Z. A Final Mi igated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA ard State Guidelines. The City Council has received and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prior to acting on the p' opooed project and has found that this document adequately addresses the 'uvi,nomental effects of the proposed project. On the basis of the zoiti~i Study and the fact that no comments were received during the public rev prnce ;s' the City Council has found that there is no substantial cvidrrre that there will be any significant adverse environmental effects as a result '`E the approval of the project because mitigation measures ide, tified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the project which mitigate any potential significant environmental effects to a point where clearly no significant effects will occur. Th,, mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration art, ,n,orpn/ atcd herein by reference, and have been included as conditions n, ppr',ral for the referenced projects. Section 3. A mitigat/L' . Report 'ng and Monitoring Program has been prepared for Development Plan FrrniNo. DP-348 Major Modification No. 1 in compliance with Section 8l0E1 ', of d.'' Public Resources Code. The Mitigation Reporting and Mouitvri,`' er'.gra/, is included in the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration prep,, -ed for :he subject project. The City Council has received and considered he nitOatioo Reporting and Monitoring Prwgram, incorporated herein by rpI.^ p' i"r to making a recommendation on the proposed project. This action with the foregoing dir,'c 'c'` approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PAS5ED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIE nq- OF rxmoAnY 17, 1990. i A"rsnn' Mayor ATTEST: Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk (,''' DP-348 Major Modification N Page -1- A-Z Self-Storage February 7, 1990 MITIGATION MEASURES AND REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM I. NOISE: Mitigation: Prior to issua/`: '', ` oning clearance the following mitigations shall be a8opte']. a. Reduce hours of operation o uccut between 8.00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. during weekdays and l0`0( a.m. - 4.00 p.m. on Sundays. Sunday operation shall not be 'ffectzv~ until the easterly wall is raised or additional land' ':mo'no is installed all along the east property line. b. The applicant shall pron. je hew landscaping as a buffer on the adjacent single family r^sidrnceo , if the adjacent home owners choose this option afce' a meeting to be arranged with the Community Development Di/ ~ctor The landscape materials to be installed by and at th~ ,xpens,. of the applicant, must be approved by the Director ' '''mm'/r /ty nevelopmeot' c. Consider the pnasibilit) f jnr,r^sing the height of the 9 foot wall along the eastern pr e, /r ) : .e of the project site. Reporting and Mmnitmr4m: For mitigation conditions b, and c . . ,pvise'1 landscape plan and/or a wall plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to zoning clearance or a change in hours of operation. The Code Enforcement OfAce- fv/ the City would be responsible for the monitoring of Condition N u Monitoring will only occur if a complaint is received regarding ` .r of operations which are in violation of that approved by cIty Council. The Code Enforcement Officer will provide written notice `,l 'iolatioo as rcquired. If a second violation notice is required, the o`'`e, of the property will be required to pay a penalty fee equaling double ,he ,'o,' to the City for enforcement activities beginning with the imi ' .1 ,/.sp'.ctinu. The City will place a lien on the property if the fee not paid and there is continued violation of the outdoor repaL `/c , k restriction. The Community Development Department will also | 1/p the option of scheduling a public hearing before the City Council '''' 'mn~'.dio . ,t portion or all of the funds in the Performance Bond ($lD'UO(' ' `' /" =rited for 7nntinual violation of this condition. dp349A. doe-7\ nc53� DP-348 Major Modification: r; Page -2- A-Z Self-Storage February 7, 1990 2. CIRCULATION: Mitigation: a. Full improvements and tl;• wlcienitig cf Los Angeles Avenue which would be carried out by l,, • h the C ty and the developer. b. After the City has comple d the '.Qidening of Los Angeles Avenue, the applicant shall provi e fell street improvements (meandering sidewalk, paving, curb, gutter tree wells, landscape and irrigation systems) along o Ansae es Avenue in the State Highway right-of-way. Reporting and Monitoring: The applicant shall submit to the +y of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared y Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with t.h, ,...ty of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post offici.et,t surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements Prior to issuance of a zoning cler anc,, the staff planner shall contact the City Engineer's Office to deter the compliance with this condition and shall document compliance by placin, a rot ' n the project file. dp348A.doc\pcs36