Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0207 CC REG ITEM 11G MOORPARK PAUL W.LAWRASON,Jr. pear,' STEVEN KUENY Mayor 0 City Manager „t! CHERYL J.KANE SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern - • City Attorney ELOISE BROWN PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C.P. - Councilmember 11/4 ;"/ Director of Community Development CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. \\,04(/ R.DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer BERNARDO M. PEREZ, JOHN V.GILLESPIE Councilmember Chief of Police LILLIAN KELLERMAN RICHARD T.HARE City Clerk City Treasurer MEMO . ANDUM TO: The Honorable Ci' y Council FROM: Steven Rueny, City Manager DATE: February 2, 1990 (Council Meeting Feb. 7, 1990) SUBJECT: Consider Authorization to Loan Funds to Caltrans to Construct Improvements at Southeast Corner of Spring Road/Los Angeles Avenue/High Street Intersection As the Council is aware, the city has been seeking improvements at the subject ocation for approximately five years. Caltrans agreed to oLrain the necessary right-of-way and construct improvements a the southeast corner and the City the northwest corner. The City fulfilled its obligation in 1987/88. The City has bec,n informed that while Caltrans finally obtained the right-ol -way, it did not have funds to construct the improvements i: the current fiscal year. The apparent cost estimate for t: .s is $40, 000. Unocal is obligated to reloca _e the existing sign. The City has suggested that Caltrans entertain a loan from the City to allow the project to be Astruced at this time. Dave Roper, representing Jen / Baxter, District 7 Director, indicated that the loan suggstion is acceptable, however, Caltrans cannot guarantee ween (;r- if the City would be repaid. He stated that ' he California Transportation Commission would have tc apprwe the funding for reimbursement and that the ou' cone of the June, 1990 vote on SCA-1 (Statewide Gas Tax Inclease) night determine if funds would be available. He furth( [ !;tated that the future status of so-called minor project ;uch as this project, is unclear. After further discussion wit! Mr . Roper, it was clear that Caltrans' preferred choic.7, : to have the City not only 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark Califoma 93021 (805) 529-6864 The Honorable City Counci. February 2 , 1990 Page 2 Caltrans' preferred choice L to have the City not only fund the project without reimburs(,ment by Caltrans, but also for the City to take over administration of the project. He stated that Caltrans would expedite the permit processing and provide gratis inspection. Memorandum of Understanding to accomplish this arrangement ould be authorized in three to four days and require District-level approval only. On the other hand, a cooperative a4reement to implement the loan provisions and the usual projct report process would require three to four months. If the City assumes project administration and coordination, it would probably add 15-20°, to the cost and still require an informal bid process of f -1r to 5ix weeks. I continue to find it amaz ng that Caltrans cannot find $40, 000 to fund this longstaniing project. I recommend that the Council continue to offe the loan and pursue the most timely option rather than a' T,uming responsibility for the project lacking full reimbufmment as well as contacting our legislators for assistancc ti , matter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Ji 1 . Direct the Council Tr- ;sporta-Lion Committee and Staff to continue to addre s matter with Caltrans, state legislators and TC members, with the following hierarchy of optioro A. Caltrans to fuhc ,n0 construct the project in FY 89-90. B. City assume esponsIbility for project administration/cc 1-dination and construction with a MOU for full r imbursement of City costs and gratis Calt:7an permit processing and coordination %Nil a cooperative agreement to follow formaliz : I t.-le understanding. C. Loan necessar}, fundi-!g to Caltrans with guaranteed repay ,nt . 2. Authorize $40, 000 [c t CA.trans and appropriate $40,000 from Gas Tax SK:sc wp90222.cr