HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1989 0719 CC REG ITEM 08S it a',%✓O ��
MOORPARK ITEM ELS °
ELOISE BROWN .,M ,1/4, STEVEN KUENY
Mayor out's City Manager
BERNARDO M. PEREZ Aviv
" i CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern � � City Attorney
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. �at$7 tt PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember o . Director of
PAUL LAWRASON �`o Community Development
Councilmember S.i R. DENNIS DELZEIT
SCOTT MONTGOMERY City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE
RICHARD T. HARE Chief of Police
City Treasurer MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable City Council
From: John F. Knipe, Assistant City Engineer A --
Date:
Date: July 11, 1989
Subject: TRACT 4081. (COLMER) - APPROVAL OF PROPOSED
PAD ELEVATIONS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Tract 4081 is located in the northwest section of the City
of Moorpark adjacent to Grimes Canyon Road. A location map
is enclosed for your records.
The tentative map for Tract 4081 was originally approved by
the City Council on January 6, 1986. On May 17, 1989 a
revised tentative map was approved along with a time
extension and additional conditions for this tract.
The grading plan for Tract 4081 has been submitted to the
City Engineer's office for review. The majority of the pad
elevations shown on this grading plan differ by more than
two feet from those shown on the revised tentative map
approved on May 17, 1989. Per the City's conceptual grading
policy adopted in August of 1986, any differences between
the tentative map and the grading plan of over two feet must
be reviewed and approved by the City Council. In a letter
dated June 30, 1989 (copy enclosed) , the developer's
engineer has requested that the pad elevations on the
grading plan be approved as submitted.
The City Engineer and the Director of Community Development
have both reviewed the submitted grading plan, and agree
that it represents an equal or an improved plan in regards
to grading compared to the revised tentative map. The
reasons that the submitted grading plan represents an
improvement over the revised tentative map are the
following:
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
' July 10, 1989
Page 2
1. The amount of cut material within the tract is
reduced.
2. No hauling of material from the tract is required.
3 . The pad elevations have been adjusted to fit in
better with the final road grade.
The pad elevations as shown on the revised tentative map and
those shown on the submitted grading plan are as shown on
the table below:
PAD ELEVATIONS
REVISED TENTATIVE MAP SUBMITTED GRADING PLAN
LOT NO. PAD ELEVATION PAD ELEVATION
1 760 Feet 697 Feet
2 710 Feet 722 Feet
3 720 Feet 722 Feet
4 726 Feet 736 Feet
5 720 Feet 731 Feet
6 752 Feet 759 Feet
7 706 Feet 721 Feet
8 710 Feet 727 Feet
9 730 Feet 727 Feet
10 720 Feet 720 Feet
11 700 Feet 708 Feet
12 750 Feet 757 Feet
13 750 Feet 748 Feet
14 780 Feet 768 Feet
15 774 Feet 761 Feet
16 680 Feet 692 Feet
17 680 Feet 677 Feet
18 665 Feet 672 Feet
19 654 Feet 649 Feet
20 670 Feet 668 Feet
21 625 Feet 662 Feet
July 10, 1989
Page 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the pad elevations on the submitted
grading plan as shown in the table above be approved by the
City Council as being in substantial conformance with the
revised tentative map.
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meetinge�
of� , `` adic98�
ACTION _.
lre A II 'i/a iii - ja
Bye /.fAA ►/Gr—
Attachment
copy: Steve Kueny, City Manager
Patrick Richards, Dir. of Community Development
Fred Hammar, Development Consultants
Wayne Colmer, Colmer Development Company
JFK:CL:ts
JN 30593 01061/3008
JN 30683 01061/3009
AM01210.COU
•
a
Y
•
a r a
`� r—.'
/�
TRACT s tz—...,____/, �
0
H %
f 408
r
•
r z '
t y 1 .y rM• ��L AVC l n ..„....,_,.....i..- yi< �'
tv n Y Y L y .t
it,-'-',1 •f ,A cd
L4 x'drnTT+ Y o _ -4-,,, -.-:: :-.,_:4-...7
N-I
-c, - - ... .S:� yr
4
Fred W. Hammar Development Consultant
Project Analysis - Land Planning - Civil Engineering
June 30, 1989 150 C WOOD RD.
CAMARILLO, CA 93010
City of Moorpark P.O. BOX 162
799 Moorpark Avenue SOMIS, CA 93066
Moorpark, California 93021 805 / 484-0581
,.,..,/
JUL - 3 98
Re : Tract 4081 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
Grading Plan VENTURA
Gentlemen:
Questions have been raised regarding the differences in the pad
elevations which are shown on the original 100 ' scale conceptual
map that was approved by the City of Moorpark and the 40 ' scale
Grading Plan that was submitted for Plan Check. The plans differ
for several reasons . The most obvious is that on two or three
lots , the contour numbers on the 100 ' scale plan were read in-
correctly which resulted in an apparently large difference in
the plans . The reason for most of the smaller changes was to
reduce the amount of grading on the tract, to fit better with the
final road grades and to properly balance the cut and fill within
the tract .
Ignoring the incorrect reading of the contours , there is a net
reduction of 41 , 700 cubic yards of earth to be moved on the tract and
the elimination of any need for exporting material from the tract .
I believe that the grading which is shown on the Grading Plan is
superior to the conceptual plan in accuracy, stability and overall
suitability of the sites .
I hope that the reduction of the grading quantities will meet with
your approval and that you will approve the Grading Plans as being
in substantial compliance with the conceptual plan .
Thank you for your consideration of this matter .
Very truly yours ,
FRED W. HAMMARDEEVVVEELOPMENT CONSULTANT
i
Fred W. Hammar
FWH: