Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0705 CC REG ITEM 08ETO: DATE: The Honorable City Council pia. 3 s ITEM g E. _ . CRIAP9, CALF" 195 jN : Jaime Aguilera, Director of 'ty Development Paul Porter, Senior Planne June 23, 1995 (CC meeting of July 5, 1995) SUBJECT: CONSIDER IPD 95 -1, TT4986 (MST AMMICK CATION CORPORATION) A PROPOSAL TO CONS'PRUCT THREE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ON POINDE %TER AVENUE On June 21, 1995, the City Council approved Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 95 -1 to construct three industrial concrete tilt -up buildings and Tentative Tract Map No. 4986 for a three lot industrial subdivision. Staff was directed to prepare a resolution approving Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 95 -1 and Tentative Tract Map No. 4986. Pursuant to the Council's direction, the following Council directed changes to the Conditions of Approval for IPD95 -1 have been made: Gradim F, Permanent Irriaration 42. Prior to eke inspection o Permanent irr ga ion shall be prow , all�+a�4•ng' landscaping (tree replacement, common area landscaping, and erosion control landscaping). landscaping, and P� g)• The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining any irrigation system and all landscaping. The applicant shall replace any dead plants and make any necessary repairs to the irrigation system consistent with the landscape plan approved for the project. Ordinance 102 Reem irement Gleelifteftee 102 _8 4:116 PON 0 -19 be Mood-t-0 and 1-Fe-Iriff Address Numbers 64. Addresses shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. The numbers PP06833895 1I0s15e=3s \5J0L"5.CC 1 00060 66. creases s a a so $p a on a roo n - Ficife--s-c—en-Y orange with the numbers and street in letters a minimum of three feet in height. This will assist the Ventura County Sheriff's Air Unit in identifying these buildings from the air in the event of an emergency. Security Guard 90. 95. awe�' 'he eenstruet4en . (PD) In an ongoing effort to reduce redundancy and better organize the conditions of approval for projects, the City Council Resolution for these projects contains minor format and verbiage changes which slightly differ from those found in the Planning Commission Resolution. In some cases two or three conditions were combined together and /or moved from one section of the conditions to another so that the conditions are more cohesive. As a result the numbering of the conditions have slightly changed. However, the content is essentially the same. For the Council's ease in seeing the minor changes, the changes are in legislative format. Recommendation: Adopt the resolution Attachment: Draft Resolution MWZ23:9 1.10Z25a A&\3.RM"5.oc 2 00061