The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1995 0111 CC ADJ ITEM 09A 7/2, /DD ( 3) c(;. l - // 149. % ACT N. �- ♦ 19-6 MEMORANDUM By G •• c . TO: The Honorable City Council / FROM: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Development Paul Porter, Senior Planner DATE: January 5, 1995 (CC meeting of January 11, 1995) SUBJECT: MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4637-1, 4637-2 AND RPD 89-4; AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 93-3 Background At the City Council meeting on January 4, 1995, the public hearing was closed regarding the above captioned projects . Staff and the applicant have agreed with all of the revised conditions of approval with the exception of Item No. 6 of the letter relating to Condition No. 25c of the RPD regarding a requirement to have 6 foot high masonry rear walls and Condition No. 34 which requires garages to be 20' by 20 ' . The revised Conditions of Approval are attached for the City Council's information. Discussion Staff is of the opinion that the masonry walls provided for the patio homes to be increased from 5 ' to 6 ' high so as to provide additional privacy for the future homeowners. The revised condition is as follows: 25 .c. The masonry walls provided for the patio homes shall be increased from a height of 5 to 6 feet high' i ed e 5 3.1diiIg d• Although the previously approved Traditions project had garage widths that were less than 20 feet wide, it has become apparent with the building of the project that the widths of the garages have not been sufficient to adequately provide access to an automobile when two vehicles are parked in the garage at the same time. Typically, the City requires that parking spaces in a parking lot to be a minimum of 9 ' wide by 20 ' long and 10' wide if a parking space is adjacent to a wall so as to allow sufficient room for the driver to enter and exit the vehicle. The reason for requiring a additional foot in width for each space in a garage is essentially the same in that the additional width allows room for a person to open the car door to enter and exit a vehicle. PPOI:05:95/3:38pM:\IIJAN95.CC 1 Therefore, staff is requesting that condition No. 34 to the RPD remain as follows: 34. Individual garages shall be a minimum inside dimensions of 20 feet in length and 20 feet in width with a minimum interior height of 8 feet. Recommendations 1. Determine that the environmental issues, effects and mitigation for the proposed project are similar to those addressed in the EIR prepared for PC-3 and that the all if any impacts are adequately addressed in that EIR. 3. Approve the attached resolution for approval of Major Modification No. 1 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637-1 and 4637-2 and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89- 4. 4. Introduce the attached Ordinance for Zone Change No. 93-3 for 1st reading. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2 . Ordinance PP01:01:95/1:160m9e\4.78995_CC 2 RESOLUTION NO. CC - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-4, AND MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4637 (URBAN WEST COMMUNITIES) WHEREAS, at duly noticed hearings on May 23 and June 27, 1994, the City Council considered the application filed by Urban West Communities, requesting approval of Major Modification No. 1 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637 and Major Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4; and WHEREAS, at its meetings of December 7, 1994 and January 4, 1995, the City Council opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing on January 4, 1995; and WHEREAS, at the aforementioned meetings, the City Council considered Major Modification No. 1 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637-1 and -2, more specifically described as: Tract 4637-1 Phase Units Acreage 1 18 1.82 2 18 1. 29 3 18 . 94 4 18 1.28 5 18 1. 16 6 18 1. 13 7 12 . 74 8 18 .85 TOTAL 138 9.21 4637-2 Phase Lots Acreage 1 22 3. 10 2 17 1.92 3 20 2 . 62 4 17 2 . 68 5 22 2 .49 TOTAL 98 12.81 and; PP01:10:95/11:23amA:\CC.RRS 1 WHEREAS, at the aforementioned meetings, the City Council also considered Major Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4 for approval of 138 attached multi- family units more specifically described as: Villagio Plan Square Feet Bedrooms No. Units Plan A 1135 2 46 Plan B 1384 2 46 Plan C 1537 3 46 138 Range of sale price from $140,000 to $180,000; and WHEREAS, at the aforementioned meetings, the City Council further considered Major Modification No. 1 to RPD 89-4 for approval of 98 detached multi-family condominium units more specifically described as: Belcourt Plan Square Feet Bedrooms No. Units Plan 1 1505 3 25 Plan 2 1724 3 35 Plan 3 1987 4 38 98 Range of sale price from $195,000 to $215, 000; and WHEREAS, the project is located south of Mountain Trail Street between Mountain Meadow Drive and Cedar Spring Street in the City of Moorpark, Assessor's Parcel No. 505-0-153-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff reports dated November 21, 1994, January 4 and 5, 1995, reached a decision on this matter on January 11, 1995. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: C.E.O.A. Findings the environmental issues, effects and mitigation for the proposed project are similar to those addressed in the EIR prepared for PC-3 and that all if any impacts are adequately addressed in that EIR. Subdivision Map Act Findings Based on the information set forth above, it is determined that the Tentative Parcel Map, with imposition of the attached conditions, meets the requirements of the Government Code Sections 66473 .5, 66474, 66474 .6, and 66478. 1 et seq. , in that: PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 2 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan; 2 . That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan; 3 . The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; 4 . The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage; 5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems; 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; 7 . There will be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et seq. ; and 8. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake, or reservoir. Residential Planned Development Findings 1. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; 2 . The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which it is to be located; 3 . The proposed use is compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations and the zone in the general area where the use is to be located; 4 . The proposed use will not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uses, and; 5. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council determines that the environmental issues, effects and mitigation for the proposed project are similar to those addressed in the EIR prepared for PC-3 and that all if any impacts are adequately addressed in that EIR. Section 2 . The City Council hereby approves Major Modification No. 1 to Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637 and Major Modification No. 1 Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, and hereby adopts the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4637 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS A: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The conditions of approval of this Tentative Parcel Map and all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, City of Moorpark Ordinance and adopted City policies supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map. 2. Recordation of this subdivision shall be deemed to be acceptance by the subdivider and his heirs, assigns, and successors of the conditions of this Map. A notation which references approved conditions of approval shall be included on the Final Map in a format acceptable to the Director of Community Development. 3 . This Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire three years from the date of its approval . The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to two (2) additional one ( 1) year extensions for map recordation, if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards map recordation during the initial period of time. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made in writing, at least 30-days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 4 . The subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or employees concerning the subdivision, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499 . 37 . PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 4 The City will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees pursuant to this condition. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur: The City bears its own attorney fees and costs; The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith. The subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the subdivider. The subdivider's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a final map or parcel map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision. 5 . The subdivider shall submit to the Department of Community Development and the City Engineer for review a current title report which clearly states all interested parties and lenders included within the limits of the subdivision as well as any easements that affect the subdivision. B. PHASING (Tentative Tract Maps Onlfl 6 . The Final Map shall be recorded in phases (as indicated on the tentative map) . C. UTILITY AGENCY REOUIREMENTS 7 . Prior to approval of a Final Map, the subdivider shall demonstrate by possession of a District Release from the Calleguas Municipal Water District that arrangements for payment of the Construction Charge applicable to the proposed subdivision have been made. The subdivider shall comply with Ventura County Waterworks Rules and Regulations, including payment of all applicable fees. 8 . Prior to approval of a Final Map, an unconditional availability letter shall be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1 for sewer and water service for each lot. Said letter shall be filed with the Department of Community Development or, if said Unconditional Availability Letter in a form satisfactory to the City cannot be obtained from the County Waterworks District No. 1, the developer shall execute a Subdivision Sewer Agreement in a form satisfactory PP01:10:95/1I:21amA:\CC.RSS 5 to the City. Said agreement shall permit deferral of unconditional guarantee for sewer and water service until issuance of a building permit for each lot in the subdivision. Said agreement shall include language holding the City harmless against damages in the event of the ultimate lack of adequate water or sewer service. 9 . At the time water service connection is made, cross connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in a manner approved by the County Waterworks District No. 1. 10 . Prior to approval of a final map, the subdivider shall post sufficient surety bond to assure that all proposed utility lines within and immediately adjacent to the project site shall be placed undergrounded to the nearest off-site utility pole. All existing utilities shall also be undergrounded to the nearest off-site utility pole with the exception of 66 RVA or larger power lines. This requirement for undergrounding includes all above-ground power poles on the project site as well as those along the frontage roads of the site. D. FEES, CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEPOSITS 11. The Map shall be submitted in accordance with County Ordinance No. 3982 entitled "An Ordinance of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors Requiring New Subdivision Records to be Included in the County's Computer-Aided Mapping System and Establishing Related Fees" E. CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND REQUIREMENTS 12 . Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, and By-laws establishing a Owners Association for the proposed division shall be prepared and shall identify the maintenance responsibility for, but not limited to, the following responsibilities: Maintenance of all streets and common-shared driveways, all storm drains and channels, and any slope directly affecting drainage or street facilities (collectively "Maintenance Areas" ) . Should the association fail to maintain the Maintenance Areas, or any portion thereof, in a satisfactory manner, the Maintenance Areas, or portion thereof, shall be annexed, at the City's option, to a City Assessment District. The total cost of the maintenance provided by the Assessment District shall be borne by the lot owners within the tract. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, an easement covering the Maintenance Areas shall be irrevocably offered to the City for maintenance purposes. 13. The CC&R's shall include all Tentative Map conditions of approval which have been identified by the Director of PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 6 Community Development for inclusion in the CC&R's, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney for review and approval prior to Final Map approval by the City Council. Tentative Map conditions of approval shall be highlighted in the copies of the CC&R's submitted for City review. Prior to sale of any lots, the CC&R's shall be approved by the State Department of Real Estate and then recorded. Approval by the City shall not be construed to mean that the City has any obligation to enforce CC and R's. 14 . The subdivider shall be required to pay all costs associated with City Attorney and Department of Community Development review of the project CC&R's prior to Final Map approval. Note: The Owners ' Association may modify the CC&R's only to the extent that they do not conflict with the terms of approval of the Tentative Map. Sixty (60) days notice must be given to the City of the intent to modify CC and R's . Further, it is the sole responsibility of the Owner's Association to enforce the CC&R's. 15. The CC&R's shall include a requirement that any future residential units constructed in the subdivision shall comply with Chapter 2-53 of Part 2 and Chapter 4-10 of Part 4, of Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 16 . The CC&R's shall include a requirement that ultra-low water consumption plumbing fixtures shall be installed consistent with City irrigation standards . The CC&R's shall also include a requirement for the following energy saving devices: a. Stoves, ovens, and ranges, when gas fueled, shall not have continuous burning pilot lights . b. All thermostats connected to the main space heating source shall have night setback features . c . Kitchen ventilation system shall have automatic dampers to ensure closure when not in use. 17. The CC&R's shall include language requiring that no structures, walls, or fences shall be erected which impede or restrict flow of drainage waters between lots . 18 . The CC&R's shall include language prohibiting use of wood or asphalt shingles as roofing materials for residential structures. 19 . The CC&R's shall require the Homeowner's Association to remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RSS 7 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS TT 4637-1 and 4637-2 PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: GRADING 20 . The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. Any new cut and fill slopes shall be no steeper than 2 :1 (horizontal:vertical) . Contour grading of all olopco Community Development and the City Engineer. In addition, the soils and report shall discuss the contents of the soils as to the presence or absence of any hazardous waste or other contaminants in the soils. 21. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The report shall include a Geotechnical investigation with regard to liquefaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. Note: Review of the soils report by the City's consultant may be required by the City Engineer. If so, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all costs including the City's administrative and overhead costs . 22 . All requests for staged grading must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for review and approval by the City Council. STORM RUN-OFF 23. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm; and b. Feasible access during a 50-year frequency storm. c. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 24. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 8 Moorpark to complete public improvements and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of all improvements . The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: a. Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps, sump locations, detention facilities, and drainage courses. Hydrology shall be per the current Ventura County Standards except as follows: b. All catch basins in sump locations shall carry a 50-year frequency storm; c . All catch basins on continuous grade shall carry a 50- year storm; d. All catch basins in a sump condition shall be sized such that depth of water at intake shall equal the depth of the approach flows; e. All culverts shall carry a 100-year frequency storm; f. Drainage facilities shall be provided such that surface flows are intercepted and contained prior to entering collector or secondary roadways; g. Under a 50-year frequency storm, all streets shall be provided with a minimum of one travel lane with a goal that local, residential and private streets shall have one dry travel lane available; h. Drainage to adjacent parcels shall not be increased or concentrated by this development. All drainage measures necessary to mitigate storm water flows shall be provided by the subdivider; i. All drainage grates shall be designed and constructed with provisions to provide adequate bicycle safety to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; J . If the land to be occupied is in an area of special flood hazard, the subdivider shall notify all potential buyers in writing of this hazard condition. The grading plan shall also show contours indicating the 100 & 500 year flood levels . k. All flows from brow ditches, ribbon gutters and similar devices shall be deposited into the storm drain system prior to entering streets. If necessary, the storm drain PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 9 shall be extended beyond the public right-of-way through easements to eliminate surface flow between parcels. Both storm drain and easements outside the right-of-way are to be maintained by the Property-Owners' Association as required by the City Engineer; 1. All bench drains shall be constructed of tan colored concrete as approved by the Director of Community Development. m. Drainage for the development shall be designed and installed with all necessary appurtenances to safely contain and convey storm flows to their final point of discharge, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall provide for all necessary on-site and off- site storm drain facilities required by the City to accommodate upstream and on-site flows. Facilities, as approved by the City, shall be delineated on the final drainage plans . Either on-site retention basins or storm water acceptance deeds from off-site property owners must be specified. These facilities must also be acceptable to the Ventura County Public Works Agency. 26 . Any lot to lot drainage easements and secondary drainage easements shall be delineated on the final map. Assurance in the form of an agreement shall be provided to the City that these easements will be adequately maintained by property owners to safely convey storm water flows. The CC&R's shall be submitted for review and approval and shall include provisions for the Homeowner's Association to maintain any private storm drainage systems . 27 . Sufficient surety, as specified by the City Engineer, guaranteeing the public improvements shall be provided. The surety shall remain in place for one year following acceptance of the public improvements by the City. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 28 . The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark, for review and approval , street improvement plans prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, for the interior streets. The applicant shall also submit landscaping plans and a copy of the CC&R's showing that provisions have been taken to provide for and maintain proper sight distances . 29 . The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Spring Road/Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of Contribution (AOC) . PP01:10:95/11:11amA:\CC.RSS 10 The actual deposit shall be the then current Spring Road/Tierra Rejada Road Contribution rate, applicable at the time of payment. If previous payment of this contribution can be demonstrated as previously paid to the City's satisfaction, upon concurrence of the City Manager, the applicant would not have to pay the Area of Contribution fee. 30. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements . Any right-of-way acquisition necessary to complete the required improvements will be acquired by the subdivider at his- expense. The Agreement shall be prepared by the C> ty and shall be si nedby all parties of interest bedicated p b .ic stets shall an o ar to they `ez a County Rod Standards { st recent revision). .. The street improvement plans shall provide for the widening of Mountain Trail St. at the southeast corner of the intersection of Mountain Meadow Drive. The existing transition shall be widened to provide a minimum curb to curb width of 51 feet. The striping configuration shall provide two twelve foot through lanes, one elevenfoot turn lane and two eit foot bike lanes ri Any ght-egg w .neteaaa.x tatghbe wjdeanjxiq shall b dedicateadt s the City<.von the Tract tap. 31. .:. "A1 n, rc and "x" Streets.;nha:l.l be desi d per vent s mc my Standard Plate -5B hav ng a ;49 forst right-of-way d a pavement04701004V**40tigt 36 feet and shall be offered to t i ci `atot dedication The terse otic n oft " a try 'r Street shall i .deli 7:e td constructed with a uckle per Ventura County Stan ard= P aa' ww �y. : ............. p pyy @ ,p y��{yy 'may... •'R Y . : A th ORRtI M R�nse, stop signs fs ali i/¢.yi of e, :foll owra ng .inters tions 4 on MAS ,tatx'eet;.at ac .Spring Malt OilaA" Street;•at"Mountain ;Meadow='give ........::.. gg Stteet...at.'. .::street b .fit the.:+etch ' tense, "A" Stre2et shall b > pout and marked fear p ing as required byr the kali Wo .................................. PP01:10:95/12:21amA:\CC.ASS 11 32 . A meandering sidewalk on Mountain Meadow Drive, Mountain Trail Street and Cedar Springs Street along the property frontage shall be constructed, with the precise design and location approved by the Director of Community Development and City Engineer. The following criteria for the design shall be met: a. Sidewalk cross-fall shall not exceed 2%. b. Sidewalks to be a minimum of five feet wide at all points. c. The meandering sidewalk shall be contained either within street right-of-way or within an easement offered to the City and recorded in conjunction with the map. d. The applicant or homeowner's association shall provide an agreement to maintain the sidewalk and any related landscaping. The agreement shall be provided to the City for review and approval prior to map approval and shall be recorded in conjunction with the approved map. 33 . For subdivisions with private roads . The subdivider shall make an irrevocable offer of dedication on the Final Map or by separate document to be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, of easements to the City of Moorpark over all private streets shown on the Tentative Map (or Parcel Map) for the purpose of providing access to: a) all governmental agencies that provide public safety, health and welfare purposes or that enforce laws and ordinances; and b) all members of the public who reasonably need to be vacated over the private streets because of a state of emergency declared by a representative of the City or of the Ventura County Fire Protection District. The irrevocable offer of dedication shall include a subordination clause regarding all interested parties, in favor of the City. The subordination agreement shall also encumber all future successors in interest, assigns, heirs, and the like. 34. The applicant shall demonstrate legal access to all parcels to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 35 . The subdivider shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that the CC&R's will include provisions for maintenance of the "Private Drive" and any Storm Drain facilities required in conjunction with development of the site. 36 . The proposed private street design shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The plan shall show that access for Fire Protection and other service vehicles can be provided. PP01:10:95/11:21aiA:\CC.R65 12 OTHER 37 . The applicant shall provide slope easements, for road maintenance purposes only, along all roads where the top of cut plus 5 feet or the toe of fill plus 5 feet is beyond the dedicated right-of-way. Said slope easements shall include the area covered by the cut slope plus 5 feet and fill slope plus 5 feet. 38 . For any Final Map, or Parcel Map (containing five or more parcels) , or any Parcel Map whereupon dedications are required to be offered, the applicant shall transmit by certified mail a copy of the conditionally approved tentative map together with a copy of section 66436 of the State Subdivision Map Act to each public entity or public utility that is an easement holder of record. Written compliance shall be submitted to the City of Moorpark. 39 . If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457 . a. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City" ) in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462 .5. b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250 . 310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal report prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. c . Enter into an agreement with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the land. 40 . City Ordinance No. 100 and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , require updating of the National Flood Insurance Program maps for affected areas whenever any alteration of the watercourse is made. If a FIRM map revision PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RRS 13 is necessary, all materials required by FEMA for a map revision shall be provided to the City Engineer's office. This material will demonstrate the new 10, 50, 100, and 500 year flood plain locations following development. This information will be forwarded by the City Engineer to the FEMA for review and updating of the National Flood Insurance Program maps. A conditional letter of map revision (if required by FEMA) shall be provided to the City prior to zone clearance. The applicant will be responsible for all costs charged by the FEMA and the City's administrative costs. 41. As an option in place of the Surety Performance Bond requirements, the applicant or his successors will be allowed to record the Final Map if the applicant or his successors agrees to have a subordinate lien to the benefit of the City placed on the subject property. IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 42 . The subdivider shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark, the access rights adjacent to Mountain Meadow Dr. , Mountain Trail St. and Cedar Springs St. along the entire property frontage except for approved entrances as shown on the approved tentative map. 43 . The subdivider shall execute a covenant running with the land on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, street and sewer improvements necessitated by this project and other projects within the assessment district, as approved by the City Engineer. The subdivider shall retain the right to protest the amount and the spread of any proposed assessment. Nc4 ...: sha3l not & ? PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND EXONERATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 44 . Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 45 . The applicant shall file for a time extension with the City Engineer's office at least six weeks in advance of expiration of the agreement to construct subdivision improvements. The fees required will be in conformance with the applicable ordinance section. 46 . A copy of the recorded map shall be transmitted to the City Engineer tor: filing. PP01:10:95/11:11emA:\CC.R25 14 47 . Cedar Springs St. and Mountain Meadow Dr. adjacent to the subject site shall be slurry sealed. VENTURA COUNTY CONDITIONS 48. For project without public sewer service, prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of any structures containing domestic plumbing fixtures, the applicant shall obtain from the Ventura County Environmental Health Division, a septic system design approved and a permit for the installation of the approved on-site sewage disposal system. 49 . A Flood Control Permit is required for any construction work within Ventura County Flood Control District right-of-way. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS See attached Conditions CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RPD 89-4 (MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement application form and as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations . The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein in the following conditions, including but not limited to a housing mix for the detached multi-family (Belcourt) of 60 three (3) bedroom units and 38 four (4) bedroom units and a mix for the Villagio multi-family units of 92 two (2) bedroom units and 46 three (3) bedroom units . Any change from this product mix shall require approval of a modification to the Residential Planned Development Permit. 2 . Unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than three years after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to two (2) one ( 1) year extensions for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial two year period. The request for extension of this entitlement shall be made at least 30- days prior to the expiration date of the permit. 3. All facilities and uses other than those specifically PPO1:1O:95/11:11amA:\CC.RSS 15 requested in the application are prohibited unless an application for a modification has been approved by the City of Moorpark. Any minor changes to this permit shall require the submittal of an application for a Minor Modification and any major changes to this permit shall require the submittal of a Major Modification as determined by the Director of Community Development. 4 . The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable regulations of the RPD zone and all requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions o f this permi t. S. Pyya ryryli ,G334t a e:CP f 4 * Deneapment. the 73 ecthr sha.cfavoid td-the ezt 3 s`. e aatr ampecrte :,toe et�.xlt nsi ent al aS from con in 6 . No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 7 . If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 8. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 9 . ohall be obtained from the Community Development Department. 10. The permittee's acceptance of thio permit and/or commencement of construction and/ or operationa under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. PPO1:1Oz95/11:21amA:\CC.RRS 16 11. All residential units shall be constructed employing energy saving devices . These devices are to include, but are not limited to the following: a. Ultra low flush toilets (to not exceed three and on-half gallons) ; b. Low water use shower controllers as required by Title 24 of the Uniform Building Code shall be placed on all shower facilities; c. Natural gas fueled stoves, ovens and ranges shall not have continuous burning pilot lights; d. All thermostats connected to the main space heating source shall have night set back features; e. To ensure closure when not in use kitchen ventilation systems shall have automatic dampers; and f.. Hot water solar panel stub-outs shall be provided. 12. Patio covers and accessory structures shall conform to the RPD zone setbacks . 13 . Rain gutters and downspouts shall be provided on all sides of the structure for all units where there is a directional roof flow. Water shall be conveyed to the street or drives in non- corrosive devices as Determined by the City Engineer. 14 . The applicant shall dedicate all access rights over any access easements on private streets within the project site in order to provide access for all governmental agencies providing the public safety, health and welfare services . 15 . The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee or owner shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within five (5) days after notification. 16. If any archaeological or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, all grading or excavation shall cease in the immediate area, and the find left untouched. The permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist, whichever is appropriate to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. The developer shall be liable for the costs associated with the professional investigation. PP01:10:95/11:11amA:\CC.RRS 17 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT the top and toe of these slopes shall be rounded off. Also, the grading plan shall indicate the manner in which the graded - - - - - - " - - - 18. The applicant shall indicate where the export of dirt from the site will be transported Iccated ISM001NIMMEMIttoot* bjavotiiiiuoueidtkoinithWitistisaiiitoimauigttfeigthgO4aiabatS puwaltaroWItiewameautottita.vactoogronsitewsmovicitcstrim affM003401474q154WWb PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 19 . prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, a complete landscape aitiritiiideniatt plan (3 sets) , together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval prior to grading permit approval. a. The landscape plan shall include planting and irrigation specification.s. for manufactured slopes over one ( 1) foot ###§§1(1)MA00§ in height, and all common areas proposed to be maintained by the Homeowners ' Association. b. The purpose of the landscaping shall be to control mature trees lost as a result of construction. c . The final landscape plans shall also be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application. d. The applicant shall bear the cost of the landscape plan review, installation of the landscaping and irrigation system, and of final landscape inspection. e. The landscaping and planting plan submitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. PP01:10:95/11:21amAACC.RES 18 f. The landscaping shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and in place and receive final inspection prior to Occupancy. The final landscape plans shall include landscaping specifications, planting details, and design specifications consistent with the following requirements: i. The landscape plan shall include the final design of all sidewalks, barrier walls, streetscape elements, urban landscaping and pedestrian paths within the project limits . ii. A 50 percent shade coverage shall be provided within all open parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50 percent maturity. iii. Landscaping at site entrances and exits and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. iv. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six- inch high concrete curbs . v. Landscaping shall be designed so as to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window from the street. vi. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. vii. Earthen berms and/or low walls shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from access roads . viii. Backflow preventers, transformers, or other exposed above grade utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan(s) and shall be screened with landscaping and/or a wall. ix. The final design of any recreational features shall be included as part of the final landscape plans submittal and shall be subject to approval of the Director of Community Development. x. A sufficiently dense tree planting plan emphasizing tall growing trees and/or shrubs shall be designed. Twenty-five (25) percent of the trees shall be a minimum of 24 inch box size. Tcn ( 10) Twenty4iv4 PP01r10r95/11r11amAr\CC.R85 19 ............... t percent of the trees shall be a minimum of 36 inch box size. Recommendations regarding planting shall be per the Ventura County Landscape Guidelines Palate. xi. A coordinated tree planting program shall be developed which will provide a dominant street tree within the components of the proposed development. Dominant street trees shall vary between residential streets to provide aesthetic diversity within the development. xii. Irrigation shall be provided for all permanent landscaping. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the irrigation system and all landscaping. Applicant shall replace any trees or plants that may die within one year after occupancy of the last unit waithirs , phase, and shall make any necessary repairs during that time period. xiii. The applicant shall agree to provide the necessary maintenance easements to the City for those designated landscape areas as determined by the City. The applicant shall maintain the right to protest the amount and spread of any proposed assessment in relation to the formation of a landscape maintenance assessment district, if and when created by the City. The applicant shall record a covenant to this effect. xiv. The applicant shall provide an irrevocable offer of dedication of easements adjacent to public and private roads for all slope areas adjacent to roadways that are proposed to be landscaped. 9 e applicant'#hs l...'install sa, s ole headlight a x°i consmosiSSIOCWOOttag*SrigNkasiatigoiiigilaUii homeowners rho reside across from the .intersection of. " M Street ;at Xo znt&i Meadow Drive., The developer she : install said bar er;only torr those 3 a rty a+ra d �. :st st east only for ;those'. property owners a's property lis withix?'r.., 20th feet in either d ection of centerlineofeaviptiigi!§4SegaiAltit conditionwill e i one year a iter, the issuance f a Zoning earance iw .the homeowners .nave not requested; insta'llatio s f,.I barr'er 7the; developer shall notify the hs wne ; of this condition< prior to the issn ar ce of the 1st <tbning 1eara e. The deve oper shall prov de proof to the t y that all aafscted property owners have been titpl not d . . PPOI:I0:95/11:21amA:\CC.RRS 20 h, : , 'the ,appl caa t itig114US-f rxhidwlondsQaptaq :ajog the extertor of the, per ter wan at its intersec i n ai with Qulwood Street, H.lossomwood Coif Chestnut :mss Street and Sone 1'wooStreet 20 . The applicant shall submit a construction access plan to the Department of Community Development for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 21. That attached units shall contain at a minimum the following additional sound attenuation over and above the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code. The construction drawings showing the attenuation measures shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. 1. STC 50 between adjoining dwelling units 2 . STC 45 within individual living areas Note: The appropriate IIC ratings shall apply for each of the above 22 . Prior to submittal of construction plans for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a Zoning Clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development. If an applicant desires, construction plans may be submitted to the Building and Safety Department with a City approved Hold Harmless Agreement. A zoning Clearance shall be obtained prior to initiation of any grading radin or construction activity the n ea t de . esu jnl .v ha;init a ep abta0ng a. ad .. tg 'permit: and provid g a Cfty approved "Rd d Bless Agreement". 23 . All final construction working drawings, grading and drainage plans, plot plans, final map (if requested by the Director of Community Development) , sign programs, and landscaping and irrigation plans (three full sets) shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval. 24. All phases of development shall enter into an agreement to participate in a Homeowners' Association. The purpose of the Homeowners Association shall be to oversee and maintain all recreational facilities, front yard landscaping, landscaped common areas, interior private streets and storm drains, and to assure architectural compatibility with any new construction and remodeling of the project. The two Homeowners Associations will join the Mountain Meadows Community Association. Provisions shall be placed in the CC&R's to have the Homeowners Associations maintain the front yard landscaping of all of the residential units . The applicant shall pay all costs associated with the City Attorney and staff review of the CC&R's prior to the PP01:10:95/I1:21emA:\CC.RES 21 Recordation of the Final Map or issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction, as determined by the Director of Community Development. 25. The existing plans shall be revised by the applicant and approved by the Director of Community Development. The following revisions shall be made: a. The window on all ibuilding eulevationys shall be provided ided with surrounds ??iaobh. riJ.�36b^kt�la5a^.rckt. r� iEiB ! roy; . tro ptl b. Lot No. 47 shall be provided with a hammerhead oo as to facilitate access to and from the site. c. The masonry walls provided for the patio homes shall be increased from a height of 5 to 6 feet hateransoiski #001WIA00404004. d. The median° provided at the entryways shall be increased to a minimum of 25 feet long by 6 feet wide. e. All garage doors shall be of the roll-up sectional type and have automatic garage door openers . f. St ooao ss sbaf be provid at bath yi WSPINK90:1101MMIMPPinffingta40019MNIONtsittg t .atesid .s d ,tatmer t is subjects tory ui a v+ Orn0tt:Director of omrnnu?ty Dev+ le et. for buildings; S,lO,f1,12 :;axed 26 for tl oS ids fes, , the fes' stats',:: .d.. .:....i ri:::'a...:. :::.:.. .:..c>i:iS:;:... ...:..i.�.aiy: .y ...ry!.:,..�,.:.mui> �e � �:� ��,3.Cd �"R a'�bt'A't< �1�-�'�'t W�.�.�. _5 ,��r �eT18L'�� .:��.�C#'�'k�`t,'�+ perime �c fr,buzl+lx.ng 1.2 to 2# along the rear o ;that 26 . The perimeter trees shall not be removed unless approved by the Director of Community Development. Additional trees shall be provided along the perimeter to ensure that trees are provided at an average of 20 feet on-center. Any removal of trees and the method of tree replacement shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 27 . The applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing (Planning and Engineering) , and all City legal service fees prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance. The applicant, permittee, or successors in interest, shall also submit to the Department of Community Development a fee to cover costs incurred by the City for Condition Compliance review of the RPD. PP01:10:95/11:2lamAt\CC.FSS 22 28. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the permittco shall oign a statement indicating awareness and understanding 29 . No Zoning Clearance may be issued for construction until all on-site improvements specified in this permit have been provided or the Director of Community Development approves the acceptance of a Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of exterior improvements including, but not limited to perimeter tract walls (including stucco treatment) , fences, slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading, private recreational facilities, etc . Said on-site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy within a phase. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full effect for one year after the last occupancy to guarantee that items such as perimeter tract walls, including stucco treatment; landscaping; fences; slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading; private recreational facilities, etc. are maintained. 30. All roof vents and metal flashing shall be painted to match the roof color. 31. A six (6) foot high wrought iron fencing with pilasters shall be provided around any swimming pool areas. All fences and walls shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. All wall heights shall be in substantial conformance with preliminary architectural and landscape plans; the final wall design shall be prepared in consultation with the Director of Community Development. Landscaping berms and other planting techniques shall be employed to minimize the visual dominance of any perimeter walls around the development TQ. , vimn `;co1umxs shall 1' :' til 514 bot. tat sx va a 3: ?;' '., tc...elevat.ionsz., 32 . Any solar panels for heating any swimming pool(s) constructed within the development shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance. All solar panels shall be designed so as to be part of the overall design of the structure supporting it. 33. Bullnose stucco molding shall be used to soften all exterior edges of residential buildings . 34 . Individual garages shall be a minimum inside dimensions of 20 PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 23 feet in length and 20 feet in width with a minimum interior height of 8 feet. 35. Open parking spaces shall be nine (9) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in length. An additional one-half foot width must be provided for parking spaces located adjacent to an exterior wall. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inches maximum. No vehicles shall be allowed to encroach onto walkways or into the required landscape setbacks along private or public roadways . 36 . Roof mounted equipment shall be prohibited. Exceptions to this requirement shall be subject to approval of the Director of Community Development. Any roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources approved by the Director of Community Development shall be attenuated to 55 DBA at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on-site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 37 . All adjacent property line garden walls or wrought iron fences shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 38 . For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize on-site and off-site glare; provide adequate on-site lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. Lighting devices shall be high enough so as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of one-half foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties . All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. The lighting plan shall include the following: a. All parking lot pole lights shall be fully hooded and shielded to reduce light "spillage" and glare. PP0I:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RSS 24 b. A photometric plan showing a point-by-point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten ( 10) foot grid center. c. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be sixteen ( 16) feet. d. Fixtures must possess sharp cut-off qualities with a maximum of one-half foot candle illumination at property lines. lcvcl of illumination shown (maximum to minimum ratio bctwccn lighting otandardo) . f. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. g. Average maximum of one-half foot candle illumination. h. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. No direct light source shall be visible from any of the adjacent properties. i. alitee* : g ti Cie etandsc +de �! t l # MDtxr pts] payment 39 . Television cable service shall be provided to all residential units consistent with existing cable system requirements. Undergrounding of cable wires is required and no lines shall be allowed to be extended along the exterior walls of the residential buildings. 40. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be those that were approved per the exhibits to the Department of Community Development. 41. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used. 42 . All proposed utility lines within and immediately adjacent to the project site (as determined by the Director of Community Development) shall be placed underground to the nearest off- site utility pole. All existing utilities shall also be undergrounded to the nearest off-site utility pole with the exception of 66 RVA or larger power lines . This requirement for undergrounding includes all above-ground power poles on the project site as well as those along the frontage of the site in the road right-of-ways . The developer shall indicate in writing how this condition will be satisfied. Any above grade utility fixtures shall be placed adjacent to landscaped areas and screened on three sides. PP01:I0:95/11:21emA:\CC.RES 25 43 . If skylights are proposed, the specific type and model must be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure that they shall be of an opaque type to minimize evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 44 . Rubbish and Recycling Space Allocation Requirements: If required, rubbish and recycling disposal areas shall be depicted on the final construction plans . The number and size of the bins required, and the space allocation for areas of disposal with enclosures shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling/solid waste management programs. a. Rubbish disposal areas shall include adequate, accessible and convenient areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials . The dimensions of the recycling area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of collection in the area in which the project is located. b. Adequate number of bins or containers shall be provided to allow for the collection and loading a recyclable materials generated by the development. For multi-unit residential developments, space allotment for 2 three cubic yard bins is required (107 " x 84 or 168" x 53.5" ) . The intended use for this space is to hold two side-by- side 3 cubic yard containers (one for refuse, one for recyclables) to serve at least 20 units. c. The design of the refuse disposal areas shall be compatible in design with the development and the surrounding area. d. Disposal areas shall be protected from weather conditions which might render collected recyclable materials unmarketable. e. Driveways or travel aisles shall provide unobstructed access for collection vehicles and personnel, and provide the minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet, or other specified clearance required by the collection methods and vehicles utilized by the hauler. f. A sign, approved by the Director of Community Development, clearly identifying all recycling and solid waste collection and loading areas, and the materials accepted therein shall be posted adjacent to all points of access to the recycling areas. g. Refuse disposal areas shall not be located in any area required by the Municipal Code to be constructed or maintained as unencumbered, according to fire and other PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RRS 26 applicable building and/or public safety laws. h. Recycling area (s) shall be located so they are convenient and adjacent to regular refuse collection areas . i. Each recycling area within a multi-family residential development shall be no greater than 250 feet from each living unit. j . Enclosure. The design of the refuse enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance. All rubbish disposal areas shall be screened with a six foot high, solid wall enclosure with metal gates . Pipe guards shall be eliminated around typical rubbish bin enclosures and each enclosure must have a non-gated indirect pedestrian access. k. In cases where space for 2 three cubic yard bins is required ( 107 " x 84 or 168" x 53.5" ) , the opening of any bin enclosure must be at least 84 inches (the size of a three cubic yard bin) . This requirement applies to the amount of space exposed when the gate is fully opened. i. Each refuse\recycling enclosure shall have gates and should be designed with cane bolts to secure the gates when in the open position. ii. Space allocation for rubbish and recycling enclosures shall be designed in a manner that complies with the equal access requirements of Title 24 of the American with Disabilities Act. Zoning Enforcement or conducting condition conformance otaff for condition performance monitoring or zoning portion of the depooit. The Director of Community Development register. 46. ��' 3'kStor of Co m be ldprtent Haar det Se 4 C gnh projectthat is rust �1i wi Con d to oz a of A sproval or for stone other just .causex a °p 3,it 4.8 ", applicant shall be li sle to :'the Gi: far: a sand all: costs an expenses to the City€ i volved r PP0IL10.95/11e11aiAt\CC.RES 27 otato conditions.of a royal or appl.zcable codes f thea lican fails tea pay al..l city costs related tb this action, 'he City may exiact,special a +sess tent pros dins as a t thte pare+ l o and pon c i a nuis ce existed (Manic pa ode Ses tic? AORiAgME PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 47 . An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service shall be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 48. The applicant ohall pay all ochool aooccoment fcco levied by the Moorpark Unified School Diotrict. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 4 9 . KW111110110011110441,'Ilitgra,A4001.1061iatudosiliovPrior p ; or casts Assoc ted wi h . c.ross.ing guar d o in y applicant sh tll agree to pay thy: t to : applica s e rate including the ' c :t,y ' s :;< pr irate casts SMx administration/supervision prior tG first occupaz t 50. No Final Inspection approval shall be granted prior to acceptance of site improvements such as perimeter and retaining walls, landscaping, fences, slopes, private recreation areas, and other improvements not related to grading, etc. , or the applicant has provided sufficient security as approved by the Director of Community Development to guarantee completion of the improvements. Said on-site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of Final Inspection approval. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the surety. However, the surety must be kept in full effect for one year after initial occupancy to guarantee the items such as perimeter and retaining walls, landscaping, fences, slopes, private recreation areas, and other improvements not related to grading, etc. are maintained. 51. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas . The striping for open parking spaces shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. 52 . All related perimeter and garden walls shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance for occupancy. PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RES 28 AFTER ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 53. The applicant and his successors, heirs and assigns, or the Homeowners ' Association shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification from the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS RPD 89-4 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT , THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 55. City Ordinance No. 100 and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , require updating of the National Flood Insurance Program maps for affected areas whenever any alteration of the watercourse is made. If a FIRM map revision is necessary, all materials required by FEMA for a map revision shall be provided to the City Engineer's office. This material will demonstrate the new 10, 50, 100, and 500 year flood plain locations following development. This information will be forwarded by the City Engineer to the FEMA for review and updating of the National Flood Insurance Program maps. A conditional letter of map revision (if required by FEMA) shall be provided to the City. The applicant will be responsible for all costs charged by the FEMA and the City's administrative costs . 56 . Prior to any work being conducted within any State, County or City right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the appropriate Agency. 57. The applicant shall submit a design to be approved, by the City Engineer, for an 18•• slough wall to be constructed directly behind the back of the sidewalks where slopes over four feet high exist. The wall shall be designed so as to reduce debris and silt from entering streets and convey run- off to approved drainage devices . STORM RUN-OFF 58 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board for "All storm water discharges associated with a construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in land disturbances of five or more acres . " PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RSS 29 59 . The applicant shall be required to comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works Department water and sewer connection regulations . These measures shall be implemented by the County of Ventura Public Works Department (Waterworks District No. 1) . Common private systems serving industrial or commercial or other applicable sites, shall be reviewed by the City, subject to County of Ventura Public Works Dept. standards or as required by the City Engineer. 60. If required by the Ventura County Flood Control District, the applicant shall obtain a Ventura County Flood Control District Watercourse Encroachment Permit. 61. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372 . GRADING 62 . All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. Haul routes shall be limited to graded areas only. All import/export activities from the site, in excess of 1000 cubic yards, shall require prior City approval and issuance of an encroachment permit. All requests for over 1000 cubic yards of import/export must be made in writing to the City Engineer. 63 . No grading shall take place within 100 ft. of a blue line channel as shown on USGS maps before giving prior notification and receiving approval from the California Fish And Game, Ventura County Flood Control District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Written verification shall be forwarded to the City indicating approval of grading in these areas. DURING THE GRADING OPERATIONS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 64. Construction activities shall be limited to between the following hours: a) 7 :00 a.m. and 7 :00 p.m. Monday through Friday, b) 9 :00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday. No work to be accomplished on Sunday pursuant to Ord. #149 . Truck noise shall be minimized by the requirement that "Jake Brakes" shall not be used along the haul route within the City. 65. Construction equipment shall be fitted with modern sound reduction devices . The contractor shall insure proper PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.FSS 30 maintenance and operation of all construction equipment. Direct injection diesel or gasoline powered engines shall be used if feasible. 66 . A 6-foot high chain link fence shall be constructed around the construction site or an on-site security guard shall be provided during non-working hours. 67 . During the smog season (May - October) the developer shall order that construction cease during Stage III alerts to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating, lower ozone levels and protect equipment operators from excessive smog levels upon notification by the City. The City, at its discretion, may also limit construction during a Stage II smog alert. 68 . A regular watering program to reduce dust shall be implemented. In an effort to reduce water consumption, the grading contractor shall use reclaimed water for dust control on site, when available and as approved by the City Engineer. Water shall be applied to the graded portions of the project site as determined by the City Engineer. This is estimated to reduce the amount of dust generated by up to 50 percent. During periods of high wind (i.e. sustained winds 20 mph or greater in one hour) , the contractor shall cease all clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations a. All active portions of construction site shall be watered sufficiently to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Non- potable water shall be used if determined feasible by the Director of Community Development, the City Engineer and the applicant. Complete coverage watering shall occur at least twice daily, preferable in the late morning and after work is done for the day. b. All material excavation or grading shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. c. All trucks importing or exporting fill to or from the Tract shall use tarpaulins to cover the load. d. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds greater than 20 miles per hour (mph) averaged over one hour. e. All unimproved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered periodically and the vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph. PPO1SIO:95/11:21amAr\CC.RES 31 f. Street, private parking adjacent to the area being graded shall be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. g. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times . 69 . Advise, in writing, all employees involved in grading operations to wear face masks during all periods of grading to reduce inhalation of dust which may contain the fungus which causes the San Joaquin Valley Fever. 70. Remove silt, dust or other construction materials, as directed by the City Engineer, which may have accumulated from construction activities along the streets or on private property in the vicinity of the site. Periodically sweep streets and parking areas, as per the City Engineer in the vicinity of the site to remove silt (i.e. , fine earth material transported from the site by wind, vehicular activities, water run-off, etc. ) which may have accumulated from the construction project. 71. Geometric improvements and traffic control measures approved by the City Engineer, or associated Traffic Studies must be included on the grading plan. The grading plan will be signed by a registered Civil Engineer. 72 . If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, and the City Construction Observer shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. Contaminated and hazardous soil as defined by Department of Health Services may not be used for on-site soil fill or roadway subgrade unless the Department of Health Services determines in writing that said material has been treated to a level that is no longer considered a public health risk or requires public discloser by the Department of Real Estate. Any contaminated or hazardous soil shall be removed to be approved landfill. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 73. Backfill of any pipe or conduit shall be in 4" fully compacted layers unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 74 . Soil testing for compaction is to be performed on all pipe or conduit placement. The interval of testing shall be less than once every 4 feet of lift and 100 lineal feet of pipe or conduit placed. PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RSS 32 75. Where roads requiring four or more inches of pavement are to be built, the applicant shall construct the required street section minus one-tenth of a foot of paving as an interim condition until all utility cuts, trenching and construction are completed. The final one-tenth of a foot cap of asphalt shall be placed after all trenching and heavy construction is completed. 76 . Construction equipment, tools, etc . shall be properly secured during non-working hours. OTHER 77 . Prior to occupancy, all utilities shall be undergrounded as approved by the City Engineer and Director of Community Development. PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOND EXONERATION, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 78 . Original "as-built" plans will be signed and certified by the applicant's civil engineer and submitted with two sets of blue prints to the City Engineer's office. Although grading plans may have been submitted for checking and construction on sheets larger than 22 " X 36" , they must be resubmitted as "as- builts" in a series of 22 " X 36" mylars (made with proper overlaps) with a title block on each sheet. Submission of "as-built" plans is required before a final inspection for approval and release of securities will be scheduled. 79 . Reproducible centerline tie sheets shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office. 80. .1450a"" rp da 3.O RTt t 9', .et. ix 4 WUXl # 'W d y 11,A;CitY: fbr...Wing• MOORPARK POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A OCCUPANCY PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET: Landscaping 81. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 82 . There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc . PP01:10:95/11:21amA:\CC.RRS 33 Construction Site Security 83. A liccnocd occurity guard io recommended during the construction phase, or a A 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 84 . Construction equipment, tools, etc. will be properly secured during non-working hours. 85 . All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc. ) will be properly secured prior to installation during non-working hours . All serial numbers will be recorded for identification purposes . 86 . If an alarm system is used, it shall be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. Building Access and Visibility 87 . Address will be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and in contrasting color to the background it is mounted on. 88. Address numbers will be a minimum of six inches in height and illuminated during hours of darkness. 89 . Front door entrances to patio homes will be vioiblc from the otrcct. 90. At 5;0, ' :iht.].t,I,.faRtfy project,; directory boards indicating the locations of the various buildings and individual units will be displayed at each entrance to the complex and lighted during hours of darkness. 91. Address numbers will be placed on all buildings . 92 . All aspects of building design shall conform to standards set forth in the City's "Building Security Ordinance. " WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1 CONDITION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 93 . Applicant for service shall comply with the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 "Rules and Regulations" including all provisions of or relating to the existing Industrial Waste Discharge Requirements and subsequent additions or revisions thereto. Ultra low plumbing fixtures are required in all new construction. PPOI:10:95/I1:2lamA:\CC.RES 34 VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITION: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 94 . Prior to issuance of building permits for development swimming pools and ancillary structures, applicant shall submit plans for development swimming pools and ancillary structures to the Environmental Health Division of the County of Ventura for review and approval. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1995. Paul W. Lawrason, Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Lillian E. Hare City Clerk PP01:10:95/11:71awA:\CC.RSS 35 • . . TO:. Moorpark City Council _ . • FROM: Real Estate Agents (as signed below) SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL OPINION STATEMENT - with regard to the • • proposed project by RBD Corporation now before the . . Moorpark City Council • DATE: January 6, 1995 As a duly authorized and state licensed real estate professional affiliated with the Conejo and/or Simi Valley-Board of Realtors, • I,. the undersigned believe that the project proposed by the RBD Corporation to be built on the property bordered by Mountain Trail Drive, Cedar Spring Road, and Mountain Meadow Drive would . adversely affect the value of existing homes in the surrounding . . , • area. . Further, it has always been understood by the buying public. ' e their representatives that this project would be one .of large-- . .• luxury townhomes. Many clients over the years have purchased . .. Mountain Meadow homes with the understanding' and confidence that ' the previous luxury townhome project would be completed as • . : approved in the original application. Thus, any downscaling .to affordable housing will compromise a promise putforth by the ' cities approval of the original product and lessen the value in . . th- . - Acmes. NA i -----t__--- -2OFF_ l)CE AFFILIATI N: - - . e i/ iir*-- • ( '-,.' .... Ap7 Agrah t:f • e . ( .41&VW., .:—. .•P' .-191P- cir _ itif ----_____,_ __ • - All! c i • . 2_ R))4 0-1/T111 / ' ' ' / / ( . f{ • l( (zOQ ' , 0, 04,,,i, Lv ,/ / » // G 1 • 7', �r 4 l 4 moo, • ' TO: Moorpark City Council • FROM: Real Estate Agents (as signed below) SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL OPINION STATEMENT - with regard to the'. proposed project by RBD Corporation now before the: • Moorpark City Council • DATE: January 6, 1995 . • • As a duly authorized and state licensed real estate professional affiliated with the Conejo and/or Simi Valley-Board of Realtors, I ,; the undersigned believe that the project proposed by the • RBD Corporation to be built on the property bordered by Mountain ' Trail Drive, Cedar Spring Road, and Mountain Meadow Drive would adversely affect the value of existing homes in the surrounding area. • • • Further, it has always been understood by the buying public and - their representatives that this project would be . one .of large • • • luxury townhomes. Many clients over the years have purchased ' Mountain Meadow homes with the understanding' and confidence that the previous' luxury townhome project would be completed as . approved in the original application. Thus, any downscaling to • affordable housing will compromise a promise putforth by the cities approval of the original product and lessen the value in their homes. NAME: OFF CE AFFILIATION: .) ,,v,d. /17,,te 72Ylt" ./0/11I_ILC ,c.,.. 61-64,4- i te,4' 4w✓ - v,14 • /r40.0/ 4.0te4 Lir • • '� • • 'r 01-11-199S 12:59PM FROM TD e- 2*#38Q5U94960099 P.02 • TO; Moorpark City Council • FRDM: Real Estate Agents (as signed below) SUBJECT: PROF' 71 0Prt .1A .. •• with regard to the proposed project .y RBD Corporation now before the MoorPark City Council DATE: January 6, 1995 As a duly authorized and state licensed real estate professional affiliated with the Conejo and/or Simi Valley'Board of Realtors, I, the undersigned believe that the project proposed by the RED Corporation to be built on the property bordered by Mountain Trail Drive, Cedar Spring Road, and mountain Meadow Drive would advereeiy affect the value of existing homes in the surrounding area, • Further, it has arrays been understood by the buying public and their representatives that this project would be one of large luxury townhornes. Many clients over the years have purchased Mountain Meadow homes with the understanding and confidence that : the previouc' luxury townhoi a project would be ccimpleted as , approved in the original application Thus, any downscaling to affordable housing will compromise a promise putforth by the cities approval of tha original product and leseen the value in their homes, NAME: OFFICE AFFILIATION: • • TOTAL P.02 JAN-11-1995 13:13 605 526 516545491714 P•02 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: ])Increase the population density of the area: 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, • 1 ' .14-;to z ip .57. i 2- ,--, 9-fo -/ January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637. (Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894, (Major Modification No. I), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved. this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept'of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore. I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully. 4f(17-t 1 11Q544 January 8. 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark.CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. I). and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved. this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area: 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully,,} ( f v L / glo , 1 1 --N'A . ti FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TO: l[, orobL C 4 CUOC(f FROM: 1/Ad c,..11e-iselaar at e_ DATE: t1Diqc -TIMM: II:D • RE: ►/ I ,. Li .r ■' , r 0., . A .+ t 0,, ' ' �.., , .' , 26, U t I!E NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED, INCLUDING COVER SHEET_ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS E ' . , AA ' I. —A a, t I .♦ b 4 e- du i II 1 .1. ,. .1.'d �" ! /. /. ii!. d t I G ¢4 I IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR DID NOT RECEIVE ALL TRAANSMITTED PAGES, (LE SE NOTIFY ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. MY FAX NUMBER IS 8/6 999- 1/1/86 AND MY TELEPHONE /41,4 7egR. 15 ( 'i-'/362-. THANKS. -\;01,41.411 AREYGUi4 s He W cam, KOU 411% INTfE5T RATS• A 7 THAT Y, [ A 0Y/1 MT ry FwAria0 ;. TMEr IiH Vu i!TE F, I .t-, cur cf. THE a. . 4pro, .1 :.!'gri, fzl .-f2. . S ... .., ""•%-- .- 1 ) , ' ..1 d. lk '1 %Su Canoga Avenue _ .. r M �` Fkwrtb Floor Woodland Hills,California 91367 (8' ) ?c,ci_'Kg"' /;.x7 0I ),-..(3,'„, vILicy. 2i, ,,,: -,._ _ , /, , ., 2s..i.,.4.,-4-4,6,-0-44-1-, - - V2 L . l/ V PAGE.@81 JAN 10 '95 17:25 • January 9,1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Regarding: Major Modification and Zow Change from Urban West Communities Dear Honorable Cyty Connell: Please, Please reject this project and make Urban Wan live up to their word(Or at least close)! We purchased a concept of West Ranch that will not exist if you allow this. We have been"Double- Whammled"by the loss of the nice shopping center and the modillestlon to allow for Traditions 1. Please don't let as be"Triple-whammied"with this modification request! Some unrelated thoughts about the project: • Why is Mr.Hunter being excused for conflict of Interest? To remove him by saying he hes a financial Interest I.the outcome implies that he has something to gain or lose with this project If this is the case you tacitly agree that the major modification wW cane Mr.Hunter to lose money on his home. (he certainly would not gain) • Why do we need a lot more condos to complete a certain mix. We already added Traditions Ito the mix. We can live with those 200 pats. Putting the lowest properties right nest door to the largest In Moorpark la bad planning. • The currently approved plan for luxury fownhomes acted as and was designed to be a buffer between the smaller and the larger homes. Smaller oa the East, larger on the wast and south. The madllkatioa plan goes the other way...lt exacerbates the stark contrast • 1 am very concerned with the school situation. I don't feel that the school district fully ouderstands the Implications with the proposed thongs. Slate we do not have fonds approved for another school,I assume we are years off on conerucdoe of another Moorpark elementary school. Arroyo West is already a small school. We already have sward portable modules or trailers gobbling up the small playground. When they approved Traditions I It significantly changed the number of children going to Arroyo West. There are still donne If not haedrede of homes under construction In West Ranch that will impact the school. In the approved plan for the luxury condominiums the developer states that the buyers would have few children. to the modification they state that there would be many more children. I feel that la one year,If this modification is spproved,Arroyo West will not have a playground,the classrooms all he overcrowded,we may be no double sesslon,and there will be many safety concerns in the area. The school district Is already"stockpiling madman"for the additional children coming from the homes. Go out and cheek out how crowded the Diary and playground is now! We already have several friends who are belling out of Moorpark schools and taking their children to Somot Lets not crests a second clam school to Somb. • Mary Froman owns In Brentwood. I think be would be madder than a hornet If we built 784 square foot condos on 1732 square foot lots across the sheet from him! That Is the equivalent situation! JAN 10 '95 17:26 PFiI.002 • No matter what they build on that lot you need to reduce the speed limit on Mountain Meadow toy!MPH and then afore*it! • The president of our Homeowners Association and may others are sot up to fighting because "The city council is owned by Urban West". I Mt dfRereaty."Pleas show them wrong! • We need to de these guys down to exact landscaping plana They traditionally use cheap landseapag and plus their Integrity is suspect due to pat prevarications. • A fellow homeowner on Wlnterwood Court has ban bort foaadailyr know at Ino some of you have spoken to bar. Ifs tough to go ou TV at city council to explain that for the record because it will Jost all more'dada to It as she tries to sell her home. Please believe her! • Maybe we could Just have RBD compensate those larger homes bordering or near the project with a lump am of money to cover the damage if you approve the modification. • IS foot wide garage with no nearby parking spaces Is ludicrous. It will become a tangled mess. Watch Melton also begin sag Quanwood,Bloesomwood and others. • It's going to look like apartment row as you go down Mountain Trail If you approve this madllleatlon. 10.15 fat of/the street with all the grading will look Jute terrible. • It's my understanding that Tradhioa I has a covenant prohibiting renting out the condo for 5 years(or something like that). What provisions are there to kap this project from becoming rent-villa At 130,000 Bala prise with 00%den,the mortgage payment fora non-owner occupied Ran could be as law as SUMWmonth. Inn really envision Ibis project becoming a downgraded,no pride of ownership,ars parted all over the place eyesore in comparison to the neighborhood! • Strike one: Modification for Traditions Strike two: las of shopping anter Strike three?: This modification Please don't make us feel like we struck out! • Urban West has a sign op on the Ventura Freeway In Agoura with a boy by•swag. The caption reads"Country living,City Close". I would like to propose a condition of approval (tongu►in-eheek) changing this to read "City living.Country Close." • Back serious again... Why don't we encourage them to build a medium sized single family home. It should be marketable even If larger than current Belman& They are slug very well! This should make all the homeowners happy! Maybe the city could reduce building foes as en Inducement to the builder to make It economically feasible for him. This would certainly make our community better sod be a win-win ellatloal Thanks for your thee and consideration of my various idea! Sincerely Yonas, David M.Scbetseaar JAN 10 '95 17:26 PAGE.003 01/01/1994 00:03 3108253214 TURNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 01 January 8. 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark.CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No, 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Uthan West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially; i)Inerease the population density of the ares; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of catain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially dam a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Resp feze_c67 //35-9 diri yoe eve Atioaricv C4L 2?C2/ 7d, 67 Y� SAN 11 '95 15:AF$ 711.1A'7C7'71A Darr ainv 01/01/1994 00:03 3188253214 TURNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 02 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No,4637, (Major Modification No_ 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept' of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively front the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordi4og the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, .c("N L� T�-t r her t t }^U yti lI 9C0elJ arra. nc ,c) 0140 M t-or- 4 JC -f JAN 11 '95 1E:06 3100253214 PAGE.002 . 01/01/1994 00:03 3108253214 TUNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 03 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sus: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on ow community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Dt p ease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning, Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of 1 JWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Cotnmunities. Respectfully, 1/ 2q / .7e),2) JAN 11 '95 16:07 - 01/81/1994 00:03 3108253214 TURNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 04 January 8. 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorparic,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. 'This,modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact On ow community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)Jncrease the population density of the area; 2)Dccrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, j #, .6 . i 7 . ' 11.238 T rrae€r^i d 5 e Plelkyapdt e A-4.io.2.1 JAN 11 '95 16:07 3108253214 PAGE.004 01/01/1994 00:03 31.08253214 TURNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 05 • January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 4637,(Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894, (Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities, Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially- t)lncrease the population density of the area; 2)Decrrase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighbodrnad standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home, The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community, Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. R espectfully, J7lT j c401A "AIV 61+ot Pec_. JAN 11 '95 16:08 71 csa-�7D1 A " W F . 01/01/1994 00:03 3108253214 TURNER:UCLA MED CNTR PAGE 06 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No_4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that staled planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they fnmc tion as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully. 61(4-- Pay? r fc/ 'r3e ' JAN 11 '95 16:09 3108253214 PAGE.006 01/09/1995 1600 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.01 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Utban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my =cern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Rauch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. 11 approval, this development modification will potentially: 1)lncrcase the population density of the area; 2)Docrease the taxable base, 3)lnipact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors white,jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent conununity. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban Weal Communities. Respectfully, k*)-t, 1abYtr1L ON' ck, 2) t-tY frvIr-Vn C.,e)vi,A)ct 11 1 77(7 JAN 9 '95 16:00 ` yf 805 565 0993 PAGE.001 01/09/1995 1600 CA 805-565-0993 B05 565 0993 P.02 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting 'Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No_ 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modifiattion of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the arca: 2)Dect ase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary tttructure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while je,apordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 19 44/111 Y1 . JAN 9 '95 16:01 805 565 0993 PAGE.002 01/09/1995 16101 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.03 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re. Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No, 89-4,(Major Modification No. l),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this plarmed development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)lnereasc the population densityof the arca; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent propenles; We purchased ow'homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home_ The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of MC Moorpark Investors while jeupordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. 'Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, , 2;4)i-ttilQtfr -‘1b4- 11jV"-ji. �1ax La , C0. JAN 9 '95 16=02 005 565 0993 PAGE.003 01/09/1995 16 01 CP 905-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.04 January R, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorppait Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No,89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially; 1)1ncrease the population density of the arta; 2)Decrrase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards, Oar transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, se‘(°4 —. S"7/'144-�kaat— c7 r)ooreP/kc, c 613ex/ JAN 9 '95 16:02 805 565 0993 PAGE.004 01/09/1995 1602 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.05 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No, I),and Zone(mange 93-3 -Urban West ConununiI les. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)llccrcasc the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they /Junction as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not Just the purchase of a solitary structure or home, The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of the homes in the adjuc vnt community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, S OF 1111. r ofizt.140., / i Lik II I JAN 9 '95 16:03 805 565 0993 PAGE.005 01/09/1995 16:02 CR 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.06 • January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpadc 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 9302I Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Mange 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, /rev tem tior e 11 ci yoS/ b{taifO 1& -s2„3- �► a JAN 9 '95 16:03 805 565 0993 PRGE.006 01/09/1995 16 03 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.07 ' January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No,4637,(Major Modification No. IL Residential Planned Development Permit No, 89-4, (Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Rands / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a signifharnl impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)increase the population density of the area; 2)Dcc reasc the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties, We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the Context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well As guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, CZb QA---\":S117\1 jt r7 9/14540-1,4)—is° Ci& el3 JAN 9 '95 16:04 605 565 0993 PAGE.007 01/09/1995 1604 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.08 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No,4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Cotunumities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a sig,nifiuxutt impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lrnpact the valuatiu n of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Thos;protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"genet"of a community,not,just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable a-s they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpatic Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent oanununity. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 4/(a f / .4. 11 I g5 �-� e `t,r- 1T T L 4 y JAN 9 '95 16:04 805 565 0993 PAGE.008 01/09/1995 16 04 CP 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P..09 January 8, 1995 City Council Cly of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Com• en . Sky I would like to express my concern regarding this planted development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l$naease the population density of the area; 2)Doarase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent psopenlcs We purdnasod our homes as pan of a"planned commwmity"coot In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that me expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they fimction as safeguards to our hlvestments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept of a community,not Just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors whileJeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, yG r .1/1.:7 JAN 9 '95 16:05 805 565 0993 PAGE.009 01/09/1995 1605 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P. 10 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Rc; Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modlflcation No. 1),and Lone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities. Sirs: i would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our conununity. If approved, this development modification wilt potentially: 1)lncrease the population density of the arca; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpacl the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a 'planned community"concept. In this type of conununity, certain protoctiorts are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantee of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concxpt"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure.or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively Prom the original developmern.plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore. I would urge you to deny these changer.as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully /4/4:v1 (#7/'‘- I 1 (0 JAAatit'it JAN 9 '95 16-06 1305 565 0993 PAGE.010 01/09/1995 16:05 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.11 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. l),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs; I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially; 1)Incrcase the population density of the area; 2)Decrcase the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those pmtcctions are attractive as we consider that they Welton as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to ntcrcase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors whilejcapordicing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Conuuunilics. Respectfully A/ ( . '! / �i JAN 9 '95 16:06 805 565 0993 PAGE.011 01/09/1995 1606 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.12 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No, 89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Commtuddes. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch I Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: luncrease the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase or a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while Jeapordizhtg the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, yit,ima E ms, Ill(o8 lieWeral04E 4 MOOR PARC, CA 9302 JAN 9 '95 16 07 805 565 0993 PAGE.012 01/09/1995 1607 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.13 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. if approved, this development modification will potentially: I)increase the population density of the area; 2)Decreasc the taxable base; 3)impacl the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain pmtoctions are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase Of a"concept"of a conunurrity,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are tmacceptabte as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizinng the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities, Respectfully, C alji/cl 52-44- rn 0_4 C, - JAN 9 '95 1607 805 565 0993 PAGE.013 01/09/1995 1607 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.14 January 8, 1995 Cily Cotmcil City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark.CA 9302 I Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch I Mountain Meadows has the potential for a slgniflcant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)tncrease the population density of the arca. 2)D:carease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of comnurnity, certain protections arc uEfcrod to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they tinction as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of curtain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially dart a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensh cly from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, jix.... (.7L 4/va (51: in 1 4 ,) 1p 0FL/1./i3O 2Jt 0 .(3Q.. JAN 9 '95 16:08 805 565 0993 PAGE.014 01'09'1995 16:08 CR 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.15 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89.4,(Major Modification No. I),and lone Change 93-3-Urban West (ominunities, Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of Certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. l'bey serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jenpordiring the value of Ute homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny those changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, SiCr JAN 9 '95 16:09 805 565 0993 PAGE.015 01/09/1995 16:08 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.16 January H, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894, (Major Modification No. 1), and'Lone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a signiflcani Impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)luirvasc the population density of the area; ?)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impnct the valuation of adjacent propenlea; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning_ Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantaesa of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"coacCpt"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent conununity, Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, JAN 9 '95 16.09 805 565 0993 PAGE.016 01/09/1995 16:09 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.17 January K. 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Inarase the population density of the area; 2)Dea'ease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of conunwdty,eatain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of thanstated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Ow transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordiring the value of the homes In the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these Ganges as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, inalui at 444A-A-4-4-0 /1/24 �.� �- JAN 9 '95 16:10 805 565 0993 PAGE.017 01/09/1995 16:09 CA 805—c s-0993 805 565 0993 P.18 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Mrlior Modification No_ 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No, 119-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on oar community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of die arca; 2)Deacasc the taxable base; 3)Impacl the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pad of a"planned community" concept. in this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the Context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. fire plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to increase the profitability of U WC Moorpark Investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. l / Rtspectfully,L / (ad TAN 9 '95 16:10 805 565 099" ponr 01/09/1995 16 10 CR 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.19 January g, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 • Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Invease the population density of the arca; 2)Deaease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community,certain protections ate offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase M a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed am unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, I// z 7diR/' Rel /eco AssfRAVV4 7736) JAN 9 '95 16:11 805 565 0993 PAGE.019 01/09/1995 16: 11 CA 805-565-0993 905 565 0993 P.20 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Coasidtf Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit N0. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on our community. If approved, this devclopmient modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protcetions are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities, Resp ally, k c,7o / JAN 9 '95 16:11 805 565 0993 PAGE.323 01/09/1995 16:11 CP 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.21 • January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative had Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.894,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. if approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)1nmease the population density of the area; 2)Decreasc the taxable base; 3)Impaet the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concent. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Rcspectfh ly, 141,111, a 110 1/4S\r\CSL-OAckPc JAN 9 '95 16:12 805 565 0993 PAGE.021 01/09/1995 16 12 CR 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.22 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting 'Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. K9-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Conununitics. Sas: 1 would like to expres my concern regarding this ;homed development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch I Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a`planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of Mal stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards 10 our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to Increase the profitability of U WC Moorpark investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent commmdly. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communitics. Respectfully, G ' j 1 JAN 9 '95 16:13 805 565 0993 PAGE.022 01/09/1995 16 12 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.23 • January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Rc: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs; would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development tnodification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Deerease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 1011111 --- ///Q3 Sly ei r 2D. JAN 9 '95 16:13 805 565 0993 PAGE.023 01/09/1995 16 13 CA 805-565-0993 805 565 0993 P.24 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpadc 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our conununity. if approved, this development modification will potentially: Dinar-est the population density of the arta; 2)Decrcase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards_ Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark investors while jeapordiiing the value of the homes in the adjacent conuuw.ily. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Oprecctftully, / it 0i Ywf, *Siz,U // /52 ,-t?.Y rata;cc Ice J fires t1 L/[, ( 9 9312/ TOTAL P.24 JAN 9 '95 16:14 805 565 0993 PAGE.024 JAN-10-1995 13:21 FROM R+R L R PLANT TO 16055296270 P.01 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: MAYOR PAUL LAWRASON Company: Phone: Fax: (805) 529-8270 From: BILL SAYRE Company: Phone: (805) 531-9407 Fax: 818-503-3942 Date: 01/10/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: C e • 1, .(4-a-rY ki--1 t • Y)1 tiv At/1" 4"�e rll f .TAN 10 '95 14:15 R1R51a33942 PGGF_GR1 JAN-10-1995 13:21 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.02 • • Dear Mayor Lawmen: I would like to begin by inttoduciog myself to you. My name is Bill Sayre and in December my wife lfatbi,my six year old daughter Lead,and I moved from Toronto,Ontario to 11193 Shadyridge Road in the development known as The Bdn-a t. My wide and I spent over four months looking at various cities and communities before finally deciding on the city of Mootperlt. The main reasons ibr our Real decision wwe the quality of lite, consistency of neighborhoods,and the appanm investment scarily offered by the master planned community of Mountain Meadows. I was obviously stunned to find out that California Community Builders is attempting to alter its original development plans for the property adjacent t to�.the fire station cm Mountain Trail. My understanding is that the original plan called ,1�for Luxur Townhemes"pied above S300,000to be constructed at that location aad now the developer,in order to take advantage of low cost government loans,wants to build instead low cost housing. There art many obvious reasons why City Council should not approve the proposed planning 1.The impact that the increased population density will have on the school system. 2.The decrease in city services as a result of lowering the potential tax pool.(Lower priced homes gene lower taxes). 3.The negative perception that this type of development will bring to Mountain Meadows. My biggest reason for opposing such a dramatic change to the development plans is that the entire"master planned"concept of Mountain Meadows seems to be based upon the premise that the larger the home,the more expensive it will be. For example,Traditions is the lowest priced develop neat in our area and its square footage reflects accordingly,and if you want a larger home,you move up to The Belmont This pattern of inameingly higher square footage and cost continues all of the way up to the Deauville devdopmerd and at no time is any lower priced development offering equal or greater square footage at a cheaper price. The proposed planning changes by California Community Builders will break this established pattern by ting a home larger than the plan#5 at The Belmont at a price 530,000- $40.000 below that of The Belmont, I can accept my property value decreasing as a result of economic conditions bad I cannot accept my property value going down because a builder will not honor Ms commitments. I ask that you and the other members of City Council vote against the anent changes and require that the bolder either honor IS original commitment or resubmit plans that do not so dramatically conflict with the establish pattern of property values in our area. Sincerely Hll 11193 Shadytidge Road Moorpadc,CA 93021 TORI 1R •OR 14:1A P1 GGIA77Gd7 on= ramp JRN-10-1995 13:22 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.03 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: MAYOR PRO-TEM PEREZ Company: Phone: Fax: (805) 529-8270 From: BILL SAYRE Company: Phone: (805) 531-9407 Fax: 818-503-3942 Date: 01/10/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: JAN 10 '95 14:1E 9195033942 PAGE.003 JAN-10-1995 13.22 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.04 • Dear Mayor Pro-tem Perez: I would like to begin by introducing myself to you. My name is Bill Sayre and in December my wife Kathi,my six year old daughter Lab,and I moved from Toronto,Ontario to 11193 Shadyridge Road in the development known as The Belmont My wife and I spent over four months looking at various cities and oontmunitites before finally deciding on the city of Moorpark The main reasons for our final decision were the quality of life, consistency of neighborhoods,and the apparent investment security offered by the master planned community of Mountain Meadows. I was obviously stunned to find out that California Community Builders is attempting to alter its original development plans for the property adjacent to the fire station on Mountain Trail. My understanding is that the original plan called for"Lunary Tovvnhomcs"priced above$300,000 to be constructed at that location and now the developer,in order to take advantage of low cost government loans,wants to build instead low cost housing. There are many obvious reasons why City Council should not approve the proposed planning changes: 1.The impact that the inacased population density will have on the school system. 2.The decrease in city services as a result of lowering the potential tax pool.(Lower priced homes generate lower taxes). 3.The negative perception that this type of development will bring to Mountain Meadows. My biggest reason for opposing such a dramatic change to the development plans is that the entire"master planned"concept of Mountain Meadows seems to be based upon the premise that the larger the home,the more expensive it will be. For example,Traditions is the lowest priced ckvelopmaat in our area and its square footage reflects amordingly,and if you want a larger home.you move up to The Belmont. This pattern of increasingly higher spare footage and cost continues all of the way up to the Deauville development and at no time is any lower priced development offering equal or greater square footage at a cheaper price. The proposed planning changes by California Community Builders will break this established patient by offering a home larger than the plan#5 at The Belmont at a price 530,000- $40,000 below that of The Belmont I can accept my property value des ceasing as a result of economic conditions but I cannot aeougrt my property value going down because a builder will not honor his commitments. I ask that you and the other members of City Council vote against the current changes and require that the builder either honor his original commitment or resubmit plans that do not so dctmatitally conflict with the establish pattern of property values in our area. • Bill 11193 Shadyridge Road Moorpark,CA 93021 JAN 10 '95 14:16 8185033942 PAGE.004 JAN-10-1995 13:23 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.05 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: COUNCILMAN HUNTER Company: Phone: Fax: (805) 529-8270 From: BILL SAYRE Company: Phone: (805) 531-9407 Fax: 818-503-3942 Date: 01/10/95 Pages including this cover .: 2 Comments: .TAN 10 '95 14:17 8185033942 PGf',F_RAS JAN-10-1995 13:23 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.06 Dear Councilman Hunter I would like to begin by introducing myself to you. 1s{v name is Bill Sayre and in December soy wife Kathi,my six year old daughter Leak and I moved from Toronto,Ontario to 11193 Shadyridgc Road in the development known as The Belmont My wife and I spent over four months looking at various cities and communities before finally deciding on the city of Moorpark. The main reasons for our final decision were the quality of life. consistency of neighborhoods,and the apparent investment seanity offered by the master planned community of Mountain Meadows. • I was obviously stunned to find out that California Community Builders is attempting to alter its original development plains for the property Sent to the fire station on Mountain Trail. My understanding is that the original plan called for"Luxury Townhomes"priced above$300.000 to be constructed at that location and now the developer,in order to take advantage of low oust government loans,wants to build,instead low cost homing,. There are many obvious reasons why City Council should not approve the proposal planning changes: 1.The impact that the increased population density win have on the ached system. 2.The decrease in city services as a result of lowering the potential tax pool.(Lower priced homes generate lower taxes). 3.The negative pettxpt ion that this type of development will bring to Mountain Meadows. My biggest reason for opposing such a dramatic change to the development plans is that the entire"master planned"concept of Mountain Meadows seems to be based upon the premise that the larger the home,the mom expensive it will be. For example,Traditions is the lowest priced development in on area and its square footage reflects accordingly,and if you want a taiga home,you move up to The Belmont. This pattern of increasingly higher square footage and cost continues all of the way up to the Deauville development and at no time is any lower priced development offering equal or greater square footage at a cheaper price. The proposed planning changes by California Community Builders will break this established pattern by offering a home larger than the plan#5 at The Belmont at a price 530.000- $40,000 below that of The Belmont. I can accept my property value decreasing as a result of economic conditions but I cannot accept my property value going down because a builder will not honor his commitments. I ask that you and the other members of City Council vote against the current changes and require that the builder either honor his original commitment or resubmit pians that do not so dramatically conflict with the establish pattern of property values in our area. Si --40e/ 11193 Shadyridge Road Moorpark, CA 93021 JAN 10 '95 14:17 8185033942 PPGF.006 JAN-10-1995 13:23 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.07 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: COUNCILMAN MONTGOMERY Company: Phone: Fax: (805) 529-8270 From: BILL SAYRE Company: Phone: (805) 531-9407 Fax: 818-503-3942 Date: 01/10/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: JAN 10 '95 14:17 8185033942 PAGE.007 JAN-10-1995 13 23 FROM R+R L A PLANT TO 18055298270 P.08 Dear Councilman Montgomery: I would like to begin by introducing myself to you. My name is Bill Sayre and in December my wife Kathi.my six year old daughter Leah,and I moved front Toronto,Ontario to 11193 Shadyridge Road in the development known as The Belmont • My wife and I spent over four months looking at various cities and communities before finally deciding on the city of Moorpark. The main reasons kr ow final decision were the quality of life, consistency of neighborhoods,and the apparent investment security offered by the master planned community of Mountain Meadows. I was obviously stunned to Snd out that California Conuaoity Builders is attempting to alter its original development pleas for the property adjacent to the fire station on Mountain Trail. My understanding is that the original pian called for"Luxury Torwnhomes"priced above 5300.000 to be constructed at that location and now the developer,in order to take advantage of low cost government loans,wants to build instead low cost housing. There ate many obvious reasons why City Council should not approve the proposed planning changes: 1.The impact that the increased popidation density will have on the school system. 2.The decrease in city services as a result of lowering the potential tax pool.(Lower priced homes generate lower taxes). 3.The negative perception that this type of development will bring to Mountain Meadows. My biggest reason fbr opposing such a dramatic change to the development plans is that the entire'master planned"concept of Mountain Meadows seems to be based upon the premise that the larger the home,the more expensive it will be. For example,Traditions is the lowest priced development in our area and its square footage reflects accordingly,and if you want a larger home,you move up to The Belmont. This pattern of increasingly higher square footage and cost continues all of the way up to the Deauville development and at no time is any lower priced development offering equal or greater square footage ate cheaper plaice. The proposed planning changes by California Conwmnity Builders will break this established pattern by offering a home larger than the plan#5 at The Belmont at a price S30,000- S40,000 below that of Tho Belmont. I can accept my property value decreasing as a result of economic conditions but I cannot accept my propeng value going down because a builder will not honor his commitments. I ask that you and the other members of City Council vote against the current changes and require that the builder either honor his original commitment or resubmit plana that do not so dramatically conflict with the establish pattern of property vat=in our area. • S ,,/ - Bill • 11193 Shadyridge Road Moorpark,CA 93021 ' JAN 10 '95 14:18 8185033942 PAGE.008 JAN-10-1995 13:24 FROM R+R L R PLANT TO 18055298270 P.09 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: COUNCILMAN WOZNIAK Company: Phone: Fax: (805) 529-8270 From: BILL SAYRE Company: Phone: (805) 531-9407 Fax: 818-503-3942 Date: 01/10/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: JAN 10 '95 14:18 8185033942 PAGE.009 JAN-10-1995 13:24 FROM R+R L R PLANT TO 18055298270 P.10 Dear Councilman Wozniak I would like to begin by intoducing myself to you. My name is Bill Sayre and in December my wife Kathi,my six year old daughter Leah,and I moved from Toronto.Ontario to 11193 Sltiadyridgc Road in the development known as The Belmont My wife and I spent over four months looking at various cities and communities before finally deciding on the city of Moorpadt The main reasons for our final decision were the quality of life. consistency of neighborhoods,and the apparent investment security offered by the master planned community of Mountain Mcadoas. I was obviously stunned to find out that Calilbmia Community Builders is attempting to alter its original development plans t r the property adjacent to the fire station on Mountain Trail. My understanding is that the original plan called for'Lmmry Townhomes"priced above$300,000 to be constructed at that location and now the developer,in order to take advantage of low cost government loans,wants to build instead low cost housing. There arc many obvious reasons why City Council should not approve the proposed planning changes: 1.The impact that the increased population density will have on the school system. 2.The decrease in city services as a result of lowering the potential tax pool.(Lower priced homes generate lower taxes). 3.The negative perception that this type of development will bring to Mountain Meadows. My biggest reason for opposing such a dramatic change to the development plans is that the entire"master planned'concept of Mountain Meadows seems to be based upon the premise that the larger the home,the mom ewe it will be. For example,Traditions is the lowest priced development in our area and its square footage reflects accordingly,and if you want a larger home.you move up to The • Belmont This pattern of increasingly higher square footage and cost continues all of the way up to the Deauville development and at no time is any lower priced development offering equal or greater square footage at a cheaper price. The proposed planning changes by California Community Builders will break this established pattern by offering a home larger than the pian AS at The Belmont at a price$30,000- 340,000 below that of The Belmont. I can accept my property value decreasing as a result of economic conditions bit I cannot accept my property value going down because a builder will not honor bis commitments. I ask that you and the other members of City Council vote against the current changes and require that the builder either honor kis original commitment or resubmit platys that do not so dramatically conflict with the establish pattern of property values in our area. • Sit Bill Sayre 11193 Sbadyridge Road Moorpark.CA 93021 TOTAL P.10 JAN 10 '95 14:19 8185033942 PROE.010 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :53 No .001 P .01 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Mayor Paul Lawrason Company: CITY OF MOORPARK Phone: Fax: 805-529-8270 From: Laurie Glowacz Company: Phone: Fax: 805-374-7200 Date: 1/11/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: Letter to follow . . . z e_ Aeriei 4The, o‘dg, z JAN 11 '95 09:00 805 374 7200 PAGE.001 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :54 No .001 P .02 January R. 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: lgncrease the population density of the arca; 2)Deaease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeotvnas that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain ne(ghbotlrood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 0..4.01—« e< in C 6-1—c-l-.0 sot,e ) 3 890 Jin ba/rie'9c it-soCLOL net oor,..Pa_t-lc i CA . 930 a- / JAN 11 '95 09:00 805 374 7200 PAGE.002 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 ' 95 8 :54 No .001 P .03 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Mayor Pro-tem Bernard Perez Company: CITY OF MOORPARK Phone: Fax: 805-529-8270 From: Laurie Glowacz Company: Phone: Fax: 805-374-7200 Date: 1/11/95 Pages Including this cover : 2 Comments: Letter to follow . . . IAN 11 '95 09:01 805 374 7200 PACE.003 PRACTICRL PERIPHERRLS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :55 No .001 P .04 January R. 1995 City Council City of Moorpadc 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Dcc ease the taxable base; 3)fmpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that am enprrssed within the context of that stated planning, Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 3790 £&n, berridyc IR—,t) Inn o o r...p aj-is CA . 9 3 0 a. / JAN 11 '95 09:01 805 374 7200 PAGE.004 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :55 No .001 P .05 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Councilman John Wozniak Company: CITY OF MOORPARK Phone: Fax: 805-529-8270 From: Laurie Glowacz Company: Phone: Fax: 805-374-7200 Date: 1/11/95 Pages Including this cover : 2 Comments: Letter to follow . . . JAN 11 '95 09:02 005 374 7200 PAGE.005 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 ' 95 8 :56 No .001 P .06 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities, Sin: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties;• We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community. certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unadaptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore,I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, ,L err.tom a, w m cL.ric 3190 bed-r- rdyc R.oac - Tfl oor,.parK. 1 CA . 930 JAN 11 '95 28:02 005 374 7200 PAGE.006 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :56 No .001 P .07 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Councilman Scott Montgomery Company: CITY OF MOORPARK Phone: Fax: 805-529-8270 From: Laurie Glowacz Company: Phone: Fax: 805-374-7200 Date: 1/11/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: Letter to follow . . . JAN 11 '95 09:03 805 374 7200 PAGE.007 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :57 No .001 P .08 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. l),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Cammunilies. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned devclopmcxn change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)1ncrase the population density of the arca; 2)Decrcase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent propanes.• We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planting. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeaponlizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to defy these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 1.- 4- In cutt.K 6-1-•0-t-.J 3 g 9 0 J_.",, bc ,-r . dye_ franc[.. YYLoorpcur K 1 C.A . 930x- / JAN 11 '95 09:03 805 374 7200 PPGE.008 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :57 No .001 P .09 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Councilman Patrick Hunter Company: CITY OF MOORPARK Phone: Fax: 805-529-8270 From: Laurie Glowacz Company: Phone: Fax: 805-374-7200 Date: 1/11/95 Pages including this cover : 2 Comments: Letter to follow . . . SRN 11 '95 09:04 805 374 7200 PAGE.009 PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS TEL :805-374-7200 Jan 11 '95 8 :58 No .001 P . 10 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. J),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant Impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Idcrease the population density of the area; 2)Dec case the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community. certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections ane attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore. I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, fac vt.� f n- a_ 3 g90 to barridye RsoaoC I toorpatic t CA • 930x. / JAN 11 '95 0904 805 374 7200 PRGE.010 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:04PM P1 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark • 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 4637, (Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1).and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Comrminities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)lncmase the population density of the area; 2)Ueorease the taxable base; 3)1mpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "pltuuted community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantors of certain neighborhood standards, Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respect fully, c 14)°4 D4 /66 JAN 10 '95 21:01 800 654 4768 PAGE.001 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:04PM P2 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No, l),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approve!, this development modification will potentially: I)lncrease the population density of the area; 2)Dccrease the taxable base; 3)lntpacl the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of conununity,certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary stricture or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordixing the value of the homes in the adjacent community, 'therefore, i would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully. i°.35- Of:Al ' - boot C.7 lia JAN 10 '95 21:02 800 654 4768 PAGE.002 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:05PM P3 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Penni'No, 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impaet the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions wat essentially then a purcimse of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to deny these Changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, MA9. Aledaztt)51:e . yoo 8 W;x, . Gdclad JAN 10 '95 21:02 800 654 4768 PAGE.003 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:06PM P4 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Cornnnnitles. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)lncrcase the population density of the arca; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpacl the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively fmm the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of 11 WC Moorpark investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny Mese changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, -) (za/).,7"ti-, "aidet) JAN 10 '95 21:03 800 654 4768 PAGE.004 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE N0. : eee 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:06PM P5 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my conceit' regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)hnomase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impad the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a'plarntei community"concept. In this type of conununity, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary st ucwre or home. The plans as proposed arc unaccgnable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, • 4o8¢ Libra iaou C-r, S)-y1— nag JAN 10 '95 21:03 800 654 4262 PAGF_AA5 EXTRA PAGE. 001 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)Jncrease the population density of the area; 2)Decrcase the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stale) planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, JAN 10 '95 21:04 800 654 4768 PAGE.006 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:07PM P6 January 8, 1995 • City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting 'Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No, I),Residential Planned Development Penmit No. 89.4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Incrcase the population density of the area; 2)Dccrcase the taxable base; 3)ampact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned eonununity" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of U WC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes In the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities, Respectfully, FROM : Kuschall or America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:08PM P7 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. l),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 934 -urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my oonarn regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. if approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)lncrease the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of thatstated planning, 'those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of Certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of the hones in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Utban West Communities. Respectfully, 0..•- (277zeso, ?9,4 ra f.3& MA/Tee-. !Alan) JAN 10 '95 21:05 800 654 4768 PAGE.007 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO.. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:09PM P8 January 8, 1993 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)inacase the population density of the area; 2)Decrcase the taxable base; 3)lmp»q the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that staled planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a oonununity,not just the ptuthase of a solitary alntcture or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They servo only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore. I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, "IY ) yc. amt ,3,„„t_ JAN 10 '95 21:06 600 654 4768 PAGE.008 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 08:09PM P9 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Thu Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 1194,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone flange 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern r hmrding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our ewmmunity. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. 'Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of MC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these Changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, . '6 & /) ftP JAN 10 '95 21:06 800 654 4768 PAGE.009 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 07:51PM P1 lemony 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. i),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: t would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has t c potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)lncrease the population density of the area; 2)Decrcasc the taxable base; 3)lmpad the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concepl. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of within neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary, structure or home. The plans as pmposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 0 194,..‹, i6ie 6 AIA--;,17,24_, JAN 10 '95 20:48 800 654 4768 PAGE.001 FROM : Kuschal1 of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 07:51PM P2 N January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Net Map No.46.37,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89.1,(Ms* Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: i would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: i)Incrcase die population density of the arca; 2)Uccreasc the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part M a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that arc expressed withhn the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of conain neighborhood standards Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concepti of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They sorvc only to Increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while Jeopardizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community, Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, • l _�1 •• WQJ Wait, 4014 wjfrrrt t WPM c-r. Si-f- fl / JAN 10 '95 20:49 800 654 4768 PA61002 FROM : Kuschal1 of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 07:52PM P3 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4(37,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. I),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: l)Incrcase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable bast; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent propedies; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our invcatmenas, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"cone pt"of a community,not Just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. 'they serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investom while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. RespodlLlly, c' Mte .KwG� A Ja.eva� GNE ute.t-t'1 W v v.)t F2 w Ova p C'\ V ort 11.C.42enrit &s1-#er es JAN 10 '95 20:49 900 654 4768 PAGE.003 EXTRA PAGE. 001 Respectfully, **Q. /S7-- 41008' Gllhta tend Cif, M The plans as pmposcd arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jcapordizing the value of (he homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as regatxtal by Urban West Communities. ResPcctfully/, 14 o 41 6Ji&/'E2 14290D ar /114 JAN 10 '95 20:50 800 654 4768 PAGE.004 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 07:53PM P4 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Reside tial Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)lnaease the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the Context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive es we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of catain neighborhood standards. Our transactions was essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the puleitase of a solitary srniclnre or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, �� p iD 65" if-Li{/fele..--- 000D Cr, FROM Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:19PM P1 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable bast; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned onmmwtity"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners That are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighbodrood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to Increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while Jeapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 93 ailAr JAN 10 '95 19:17 900 654 4768 PAGE.001 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 San. 10 1995 06:20PM P2 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. R9-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our conuimnity. If approved, this development modification will potentially: ])Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)lmpact the valuation of adjacent properties, We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeaponlizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, of , roti ., C . oaf' L).! Flftr, ?lar , l-3 O.---/ SAN 10 '95 19:17 800 654 4762 Pc1GE_002 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:21PM P3 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities, This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. if approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)lncrcase the population density of the area: 2)Dearase the taxable base; 3)impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections arc offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase eta"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to Increase the profitability of 11WC Moorpark Investors while joapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, //4'o7 4Mffnter'P '/,r 07. AIJ u W /1 - ^ � ca4R JAN 10 '95 19:18 800 654 4768 PAt .003 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. 800 654 4766 Jan. 10 1995 06:21PM P4 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 894,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Iliban West Communities. 'This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: I)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Dec case the taxable base; 3)1mpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are atiraotive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarani.=of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, • Bair CULet MLe.EWUU lithQ t&iiw 10 I 1144-3 Amttrr Ci � K Ca va3021 I�oorpcu JAN 10 '95 19:18 800 654 4768 PAGE.004 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:22PM P5 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Mootpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Comnttutities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrcasc the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. in this type of community,certain protections arc offered to homeowners dialarc expressed within the context of tatstated planting. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary stmcture or home. The plans as proposed arc unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the hones in the adjacent community. 'Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectful ly, fr-Di ttr 1 it Li l nlu�-o� _-cy\ vis � c� 930)4c JAN 10 '95 19:19 900 654 4768 PAGE.005 FROM : Kuschall of America PHONE ht. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:22PM P6 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities, Sirs: 1 would like to express my concert regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities, lids modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: t)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrease the taxable base; 3)Inytacl the valuation of adjacent properties: We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concent. In this type of community,certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are artreedve as we consider that They function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed arc=acceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to incase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors whilejeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, ?(C; fete& ±1 ((((u n-01bft4 cJ MGoR tryszY C'.rt- 9 30 2 JAN 10 '95 19:20 see 654 4768 PAGE.006 FROM : Kuschal 1 of America PHONE MJ. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:23PM P7 January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1).Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. lids modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Increase the population density of the area; 2)Decrcasc the taxable base; 3)Irnpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that slated planning. Those protections arc attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to oar investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of MC Moorpark Investors while jcapordiring the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, 1 would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, 6d-91 a. w f' dilAae4A (4512 et - JAN 10 '95 19:20 8013 654 4709 P41GF_Ma? FROM : Kuschal1 of Rrnerica PHONE NO. : 800 654 4768 Jan. 10 1995 06:24PM PB • January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Mopipark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. I),Residential Planned Development Permit No.894,(Major Modification No. l),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: 1 would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: glncrcaso the population density of the area; 2)Uecrease the taxable base; 3)1mpact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased our homes as pan of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that arc expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"concept"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They serve only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeepordixing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore. I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Resp"fully, t91 4aaga ' s JAN 10 '95 19:21 600 654 4766 PRGE.006 • JAN 11 '95 12:43PM FANTASIA 1520 FLOWER P.t/t January 8, 1995 City Council City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4637,(Major Modification No. 1),Residential Planned Development Permit No.89-4,(Major Modification No. 1),and Zone Change 93-3 -Urban West Communities. Sirs: I would like to express my concern regarding this planned development change by Urban West Communities. This modification of the original plans for West Ranch / Mountain Meadows has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification will potentially: 1)Inrrease the population density of the area; 2)Derreasee the taxable base; 3)Impact the valuation of adjacent properties; We purchased ow homes as part of a"plarmed comm miry"concept In this type of community, certain protections are offered to hormonal that are expressed within the contend of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of cabin neighborhood standards Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a"covert"of a community,not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. The plans as proposed are unacceptable as they deviate extensively from the original development plans. They save only to increase the profitability of UWC Moorpark Investors while jeapordizing the value of the homes in the adjacent community. Therefore, I would urge you to deny these changes as requested by Urban West Communities. Respectfully, Mina's EUrtncyN 6►CcaQr 31R/ rkabe U VDsst 12A metw .a4t CA 11634 JAN 11 '95 12:38 818 544 4901 PAGE.001 BELMONT HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION December 30, 1994 Re: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities. Dear Homeowner: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the city of Moorpark by UWC- Moorpark Investors, the developer of West Ranch and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the firestation at the entrance to the development that was originally accrued for 257 luxury townhomes in 1990 ,which are located across the street from Traditions. We feel that we should give you a thumbnail sketch of what is involved in this change as the decision to approve may come as soon as the city council meeting on January 4th. Originally, as we said above, this particular site was approved for luxury townhomes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average$320 thousand dollars per unit (1990 prices). However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. What is now proposed is a combination of attached, multi-family (triplex) units and detached multi- family (cluster) units. These cluster units are not considered single family units due to the fact that they come off a common court and have smaller yards. An illustration of the cluster units is attached. The area will have full sized streets and sidewalks, with common green and recreation areas. There will be a total of 236 units constructed of the two housing types on this site. The triplex units are to be called Villagio. There are 138 units planned, at a density of 14.98 units/acre. There will be three sizes within each triplex: 1135, 1384, and 1537 sq. Ft. The retail price, if sold today, would range from $140-$180 thousand dollars. These units are similar in density to the existing traditions (which range in size from 1168 to 1532 sq. Ft. At a density of 16.84 units/acre. The traditions units are priced in a range from$130-180 thousand dollars.) The cluster units were to be called Belcourt. Responding to the request of the Belmont HOA Board of Directors, the developer has agreed to change this name so that it does not so closely resemble Belmont. There are 98 of these units planned, at a density of 7.65 units/acre. There will also be three sizes of this unit available; 1505, 1724, and 1987 sq. ft. The retail price if sold today, would range in price from, $195-215 thousand dollars. The Belmont Collectors Edition homes (plans 5, 6, & 7)are 1954, 2124, and 2203 sq. ft. at a density of 2 units per acre. The "original" Belmont homes ( plans 1,2,3 &4) are 2391, 2675, 2662, &2801 sq. ft. at a density of 1.5.6 units per acre. The price range in these homes were from $299.5-$369.5 thousand dollars. The overall average density combining all Belmont plans is 1.80 units per acre. If you have concerns regarding the proposed changes and their impact on our community, we would urge you to attend the Moorpark City Council meeting at the City Hall (adjacent to the library) on January 4 at 7:00pm. If you wish to speak, either in support of or against this development change, you must first obtain a speakers card. To do this you must arrive 10-15 minutes prior to the meeting being called to order. Sincerely, Belmont Homeowners' Association L,�� 9 7 7� w�E- ) I i 1 1 •') 1 ?,.__I > _z 4 • • • . -.4 x g i -- ..< '•e‘ A 1 , I g --- s: .f.1 )„,••-•.-"ia.,. .._,4e44 - -- Y 1.• 1.8;:...:44, 1S•777.;#• ..s. --.' .._. Z r—' X ', ;Ai \ : tiMit.I..4 lit ft'llk 4,"' 1-W .-- % .' 1511t''dif .Al- 1 -.- M C) 6 . § I— > 1g Cili > ,.., 1'4., ai,:t.''''', .L.'niiiiliiiiN - • itiiigh ......--....1.-^" ."-; )g 6444_,.... --,.., ','kir._.-1.•1..-w-...",• .-01;kekii...."....01,,,i'...-;‘,11.-V....-.;,..j....."-ir z -I - • • •••4•-• i .1iirrimi..: J. +. -.417-3.1:1.3#/#,Jaiaro a I:1:•:: • ..„,............ .,..AP...J7 ' -r1 11 0 (731 5 9 m s., • . F.:z..Joilm,4,iii..1117i..i.or 11 It ..-_-.4.,•--.: .., ,A,t,';.,.-1,-z',01.1104 1.16 1111.q:tirr :°. . , t i.' 1;;;:rii,17!:. n--) gimiti ,, . , , .,.. , ,-..,... CO - , - n'P ':-.8'./•,:,3„Seni . - , '1., -. • • Iii• - l'.---i 1 rr (ca. .. -.....1 —. 'L. ' • • , ,• ,,,......i.,....1111.*".-1:"..' ' ' " 'IL'N,,. - ' '''''''''' 1 r i ..,.. 4Z- ..••:-j„•,,F,..slAt . ; ;• •,:k .•• . ,„,,t • ••11410#10. .7-libij-221. (ditit'''''"'"‘-‘lietnla r . , ,• •t" - 4 t• ' r,•-• 1 i , • (4') r-"- f• ! ) , • 1, ; , . ‘ .----• .. , ....: i ...." n i P 1 i i 0 c i 1 1 A I." i i 9 1 'S. • 1 C---- l''---3 7-7 —F-- l..r ;. . • 1 1 • :/..,... . : ) 1 -- 111/is I ED 6 ,. ' ill r.• • „ 51'E111 ' hat% it••••' g .9 -r ' ,i, ' ,,,,.r.r,'.• a • tlill •,••• Anx xii ' !Ill.....: r...t.. •' et " ' i II: ''P .C;i ' '`.'c,-4 ••••••'*".7iii . ••• & 114m •.._-••• ob..- , i. .• ....•ix. '49':•---:. ;- r 41.:...1 i •,‘• • ks-..••...• , :111111 .1.1 .,is I.V t IS% 111. ' '--'Jr.te.r• p • : '•-• i• 3: 9,•mi ( .. ik''' 4% ..,,, „... , ,,i....._ ,, p 114.001.0.WM 1.1.1111CTKPO. vamiimmmi =111111111116 BELMONT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: As President of the Belmont Homeowner Association, I am writing on behalf of the Boara of Directors to address some very serious problems that have been deeply affecting our community over the past several months. As you may be aware, our community has been victimized by reoccurring incidents of vandalism, verbal harassment and other related disturbances. Although we have taken several measures to combat the problem including reporting the criminal activity to the Ventura County Sheriffs department and the City of Moorpark, having to hire private security to patrol the areas every evening, installing extra security lights, and posting "No Trespassing" signs at the fence bounding the buffer zone,these problems persist. In response to the anxiety and distress that residents of our homeowner association are experiencing, our board met an an emergency meeting on Tuesday, August 23rd to discuss other courses of action we could take to stop this criminal activity. We unanimously voted on another extremely important preventative measure -- to permanently close access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We would also like to play an important role in the planning process of the park adjacent to our property, including making decisions on park activities, landscaping and lighting. We would be pleased to sit on a committee or attend any meetings you may have planned. Please see the enclosed letters from residents who support permanently closing gate access and personal statements from those who have already been victimized. With growing concern for the safety and preservation of our community, I am asking you on behalf of the members of the Belmont Homeowners Association and our board for your immediate attention to this matter and to place this request on your next city council agenda. I look forward to your prompt response to this very important request. Sincerely, Donna Hughes President Belmont Homeowners Association C�+v�O 3842 Timberridge Rd. sm. RE .�p 4 Moorpark,CA. 93021 SEP -1 8 G��y of Moorpark • P:4/37--) August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. 7112- , Signat4e: ' , 6;2 '767;1 / ��6. 4 Date: C(7:&6(7:- Name(Please print): —77-9:1;m4 5 A }',7 _1-7-- Address: 7//C'' T ?,?4 %?" & ,�,- Phone: 6C.IS-- ;5.5,(?- 177 Comments: 1;47,,;>41i-b-74.1 ILJU rc"<=L` ;) tll 77 (2ry p<rjs August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: Date: S / `-Y iet Name(Please print): 5 Te'tde--bn (Ai I S S , �0)d"-S J - &0mcz L71I Address: 1 I L'(, 7 ✓✓t*c 4 Phone: Car 9US c3 L-2-(-)S7 Comments: moi -,),07 kira VQ l N +0 1 (a041 civ est 3 r w'.'3 Or, tu}#oot" beer 6\r1nK.1 G� hc�'P109f re...,� Ivy ue rs lou I V / � 0,41.c 5p0ui- 1 "3 UhSceh heS su3ir-5 14-a h h,-s P°4 u2..)41. a c Om u.n , kr pool e 441 re e sum^ have. F,nwbly Ubeim cont 1-4 a hur 'eh fig--y- l e , August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shady ridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: ili Date: (r-a?tr-7 Name(Please print): 3osa AfAtas J/QA c, Address: !/4,36 reretate r,0[1e Phone: tic "6-n-d eo2 Comments: As A £FSuLi tF fl//s 0/EA/ /10/I u&i/i'-/hee= f//o,N zn/E Oesr.far/ ,teeth KAtvaJ AS dome Atilt— £otm n.) 1ST lx)t.S7 oY 7WE /Samoa HC/ors a4� Ws f(A✓E lint Mess E-6 a-Alla aPel.ifc75 e V/IAtotz/s/rn, TRezcP/iisiAlb AMO £ECtnyen D1ke,17S /A/ 771E Act Ann ,5y /JVDi ✓/Oc'ALS 7714 /1E5i0E ,A/ ,We Etc Ai ry ,92cr '1/4Mine 4Cte s ". OE HAVE A/t7,1e7) A LA-/2 Z AntacrA/T DF /GEVE$77t.,rt-A_6 771A-F-FIL AT All Ake 2S or ME D/ry •//4/42 A/f4.q/ Cbmm,nj . ?O 4A/O Mom /71r re niJ T'1 A/Lr`}7. JAI ilosn,2o n/.s OCC A s r O n!S 771E3E ,Ivo; V7/4) i7" NAVE Jai 1NE OCL r�r/z7 Ant) LO.c4�4, 7e-o ntis O� /AiloAu1� AalD �Si� Rgf� & PEncC AT /I'LL 11/15 a DAV 'Ne Al, . WE ('LME It fin Oaf 77/4-7 me an A✓rlr—nt nit toyer eu/a-L LE Ba!Lir /s A/ Ar /an 77€m/ & den - n/omenedS A/Atco usa—n Po Al 6.0 EL ATE Aa.) D a n/ b j cy N/Yflto. AMo Rex o//OL ACT/✓/TIES . aE. LIAO eLSTPtNo 'WE Lt CC, DefboYrnern iAi This MiAis IAL_ 7Ntl2EaLCE IU'E NO Lc Alan. Arra S'APE c7ili< ,v /'4 or il/E 4ei! WE LL1 LD APP/LUaTE putt SYPPD2T o AI r PrrlmA 'der CLcsu,ze Oi Aecess 7NIleu6a/ THE SELO/76C- T2nL August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signet re: ft- 7e-Lell Dater /Gj - Name(Please print): l,( 0 ,Q, ---2)I^ (P,, Address: \ \--A--1- —7.Lt M,eu„ CT I Phone: `_7,?j;� — a c4. l0 Comments: .)‘"-X-- --1-1-reA cL,,..„..01 1._,_,_____ , .. . � � C _,_,,e -I c____ August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. / Signature:ft Ay Date: ,�02e I Name(Please print): &N✓Vit"/f l til/ E// 57161,-27 Address: /// 7/ 7 iEg(et� /�/Qp e //// . , Phone: PDS -Sol ? - 4i'lc3'6 Comments: L 1 j /f62-Vy 77'7 I 944-re /l .41769 r 00eN g-T 7Z-- FND d /= 7hIf C ( er sf! e7 Al Slf `ro� / Qy e w /7/ gAe4- (17 /5- Cf-E� T 74714 SFc ✓zr oG oe (5 boo /t1-`)v rotg -e h'el-6n1W / 7ooN� ,�e / > 1 - 7L Uel /*�a/e 7 AV 7` /Tp �(4 , r i -/Y/v V August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de•sac on Shady ridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. z -21 Signature: 't-1�- Date: �j G Name(Please print): /5/2�ji&i oc�i2/74A Address:((Z 7/ ,i.<1ft/4i?cjt PL- Phone: tv 5 �S — 22_5 J Comments: en W`Ar,th\ 11, \Pc t `venin \pcrv� h� mow ,� r\� , tip � (�� Esc \(\ri`-\1 • - ,\I \--:-_) c .)ro August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor l.awrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. if Signature •� Date: 8/a &/f (71 _ / :A' fKU f Name(Please print): Aw ✓AAi C..L.- V . �0 Address: Noce_ /s Zimcc�tici)e- l�-c(... - Cir- nLa'6di1 Phone: Pt.J— 3----3 ( — j/Odo Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: .Cf�,/_ - Date: (21:-//1 /6 Name(Please print): Address: /!/81( irk, 4k' ,(/ 42 Phone: eel-5 5 2 3 1v 9'3 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: u j !Y JS Date: b'"/241' l4 Name(Please print): M. �CAl6,"rCi 1'1* Address: , II n/ ((Jec a . i, Ce0Phone: 5 Lc1 5/f Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: ✓ 1 ( ^ v \ Date: p 747z. Name (Please print): 0Y Git r y Address: 2-9 I 1�`l ca4b6 /2J) Phone: 53Z ' ZZ-53 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: (Ota /� nn�-- Date: g faelq4 Name (Please print): k\) &/\) y4-" Address: it 1 d- �Ps^rep_0 rite-11C .lam Phone: c90,5-;-- S32- 239-2- Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: �� a Ai Date: q Name(Please print): F ifT Address: 1 ) I I ? Te-t r,4 r c r ; cPg Phone: (? S) sjr— (3 T-' Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rke, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: � �✓��i�.�Ltu/ Date: f _ acc.- _ Name(Please print): (Susan Pns 4a4 ) Address: ///4'8 7rrace 'e /?oao( Hoc rpa,-A1 14 9362/ Phone: £ro S2 3 •- z/ 2_0 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de•sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association rvould also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. • Signature: i °, 6' (. Date: I ap c1 Name(Please print): KJZA\ \ Uyvd \C {4 e _stu2 Address: U h Q -IC. N42\-�CC.1�.�L\yC. ��. J Phone: Cta t'). Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making d son landscaping,lighting and park activities. 1 Signature -____ — • Lt' Date: A / 9 9 rc/ Name(Please print): �. 6 6 y /7--)/4 x6c)L. Address: / / / 9 y— / 62_,72 iQ 6 �Ur7d Phone: rr0 J� f 3) l 2 6 �/ Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature.: —21.1t- ,JL 7i Date: Name(Please print): ,jyiy A 07�y;1.1 Address: //Mg it2lltp./-1 P kio Phone: ;!a3-9V9/ Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: �� Date: tic t3 Name(Please print): �t L,r6-er\ LAc t `H--'�2 Address: t2-N �j fle‘C.X k�1OZ Phone: €)°c Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature; ��1�//d!/L(/ , Date: K/ZS /?y Name(Please print): 'i �/9� . / ( /4'2e4- Address: /4272_ �� LE � maloe//J_t-,47 a `7302/ Phone: .`ga5-7 C37— O z-D/ Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. ^- Signatur_ /� Date: i , 513 4 Kerr //fir Name(Please •rint): d nr, /% I frhi\� / / Address: /%d 0 / e'/A;(t/,deil /lel ' /fN �r"S Phone: ( t7 03-3 ,2 - 131't Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. Sign atur� � Date: it YL/1 Name(Please print): Address: ///il /r k°e,ger= Phone: -,1 ,S(V Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. 1�� / , /Ili •11111 Signature: a YJ. ,a rL / Date: g- c/b '9 Name (Please print): ,DCICI / (a G // pi: , Address: / I (5Z 1' Y cfit/ O� t , As,I6/9 J z Phone: 0 2vDS - X32 - 24, 49 / Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: .71," c�L Date: )/a g� Name(Please print): ((((( 0 Al Con, . �l a • t Address: j�C �� c vAIL, ex-r cOse_ `-' \--Gu„Fct (C Phone: 6(o- ) c zR- 1-CDI-79 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signaturee_j �__ Date: OR F - 25/ Name(Please print): 5' /( Address: 2f 7 4,41// _,,02Z/226,--.6 Phone: 5W 5 536:)-/c) (3 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like ti .n important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making d- ons la • aping, lighting and park activities. Signature: •a - — Date: Z C—� Name(Please p ,int): V/,( C.-1,w_ ( Y't - 00A-1) C le Fl C nn /� /yi- Address: V I b �0�r\OCe P C{.• Phone: CRO � S LSS Comments: / — ' I August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: / .1) Date: 1/2>'/9 t Name(Please print): eh enyl A , keirsiktoss,, Address: 'OPV 114i/erretd4e LOui-4 /1100-- avlC- Phone: (F6,5) 53/ — /0/1 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signatute: \."t'a,, ' 1). .c:-(c Date: �,`wt1ck1/4{ Name(Please pt): ��\c -\ --S. �OTALIL Address: 4-V BS 1 VcN�' IDGG Cra}(Z T. 1‘Ame_P Wf kcia,A . Phone: (PoS) a' -°i- 3. 03 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: /4 IAA / g 4 Date: Name (Please print): ll\ 6\S \tr—t5D4 Address: 3 ) 01 R c '10•CiFy r'ir Phone: Alt9,9y(ht�J� C p / Comments: p 'l-cC..t y€.7") L...k o Lte—e."1' �. , o to tiLleye c ti—•J kipck 44lc Ucc� a� t ke 7 5.1-vfel-. -1-f { :5 re-p.c./4 t 5 de-14 / Z a-my `y eke cc-F hcceSScvy / Jcy L. � J /�ole � y I S w.y c9i � wtos+ Ra a lr-e4Ge,,, hc- e C( {� Cra. y /�ul' � t A r�s 5. 5g-1 - 6g91 August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issue cludin making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. I Signature: / Date: CC/CA/911 Name(Please print): 6-7) .„1 Sh-nr S 2(�A J Address: VAvc �,P,{(d(9Q d L Phone: SO F CS Comments: wR,\N ov\t-oL_ \,\(0../Le_ (pt„,( frttil ucfc,A) k_ fu(L° ettrv,0 1 ve-v\\\ 04 , e-,-nz , ,,� Q, Imo. _( August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: „'e 4 , / Date: - 2 P--2 Name(Please print): 04,7 /S[-,,'/h Pt,—�,0z Address: L. Phone: V d S 57.53/ 57.-2-&6 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. i Signature: S . ft Alor / — Date: 6 2� nj L 1 Name(Plea a print): B e ATR I ? F I I APAP e r ,4/F_-b Address: l/QU(91 �kA+71j P 1 n� b---- , � U� • Phone: ' 'Q Sr S 2 0 o ci , Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: , 4 c l Date: 4/.2 L ' , r, I h Name (Please print): IDA-0 w to CAAef , ,5'cE Address: //3°? /VPP 246b/ - erog aPk Phone: S'z S- S--31 ^ 2 2 <e / Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor l.awrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. r Signature: -/ _ . �� Date: Name(Please print): e ' € , '2 2 . AZ Address: '''71;59 / / 744 Phone: £)o :47c5 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. a/2yy Name(Please print): • L r e!�( 1 L I / Address: /1375 / lel(40 r i c.7C C . Phone: 3 _ (.5.--)i‹.3 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association :Mould also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: Date: d 0/42 Name (Please print): /�(g12( -574-61e(-410°- — C-oOM ( S Address: p/ 13 / f �j.47 i4-19L---/ E�1 Phone: 0 o S s / 3 `� to Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: Y/ Date: `6- ��U , Name(Please print): l- � r r I* r Address: ,-j c%? ;Qin ?/rid 12 Phone: 7 - cj6 ( t Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signa re: � DateL ,,c T3/chi Name(P1--se print): /1_54 675 jy rpm. Address: )4177c/62_, e- /tom r CSP r Phone: �.S .5_J 16' 7 2 • Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping,lighting and park activities. Ic Signature: -1 -n. viva Date: �'/ r. I Name (Please print): i<(' i'•-'- Address: ( I .4 ?) ,P,% 91r? fK pc; r i Phone: , — ( b Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: /P�.� ` '1 0.,/y) { Date: ? j f Name(Please print): in a t 5 a y Address: Pit), beHd C ( (Ycor�ncrr Phone: (,�OS ) S a 3' y S Comments: 111 August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members, and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: /PP�(.v,C //A • /` C Date: (S-53— c7 —9 Name(Please print): ,De,/4 $ � D i (74 6,g Address: /7 AZ 76.� - 724,4 / ' iLLC-1�-G,e_ /! l 6e ��l Phone: 5-02i - 3/ 9 7 rJ J Comments: August 25, 1994 Oear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: 7t32:7, 7� �� Date: ZC7 (Kt Name(Please print): f ' I ccrt ViLl A en,0 Address: //Vcif drnaFLI'iJc�.c ET Phone: S7`7' 7 `��'c]rG Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. it Signature: /I, l� /0I Date: ��/( / Name(Please print): 'J (.7-11 t ( 4 Q 9 1 (/ l Address: 1 / " C a v Phone: C ,'— 9 30 2_ 1 • s') ��Vv � Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions cn landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: /� //� ` j c� # Date: p 262-95` Name(Please print): S \yn v/ -cop- Address: \\.-V5—y "VxM` v v v�anlQ LS Phone: gC;S' a,tit: 12- Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: YQ,n. , n ! Date: 3/ 8i2N Name(Please print): �I(t,- e ;r 1i te=e ;r-1„ Address: t H-1-7 Ain, P r, )�F C'+ . Phone: 5 ? I - 917 6 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. i Signature• �Vi&_� �4 i - Date: 121/9 `7 Name(please print): ,-1<7yeAL , , juteL-��2� Address: /! % Cj 6 /4in5,fTC 2. Phone: 5z 3 . Z 2 L Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signa / �(� Date: Name(Please print): (OCi I n Address: cl):)q3(--/ M Q/��ll 2CL- Phone: Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: // 1 , ci•7 Date: / . �� Name (Please print): //V le-r--) Address: 7 r-S./-S. / z i,L7c /ori�� 4_, Phone: Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issu- •cluding making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. „JrI Signatur• : _ad a/ • Date: ler Name (Please print): //`T^' oC / / / a1A- Address: 3,.5,7 4-e%/ZI /c y e go/ 000,c4 9- t j �T Phone: c�o,�---3; 9_,�,3 // Comments: o August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature: Date:/ Name(Please print):�in 1--�,cc�i /—C C4 Com / Address: 3f' / . Zfl c.ft_IC(016 E 2 Phone: /7/4 eyv 77(72e_ C' 7 c/L( Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. • Signature: Date: 09/* Name(Please print): CA/75 51 1eh/'G Y//de, Address: 3453 /m berriq,e, iC'o/ Phone: 605.523 . 2223 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association supportthe permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for imm>sdiate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. j'-\ Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the punning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. �� Signature: � rr� Date: g/2-• fly Name(Please print): - l r' G �G �/ )! 2 Address: / °� vri b '1/ j7/1Y, ' Phone: ) {",M C 5 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: ( / .. Date: >2_ Name(Please print): ` 1/�Z�(71f Address: 3Q �1i ///f eL"i��/A Phone: cJ i.?/—vk.? 6 6 Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping,lighting and park activities. Signature � Date: mil ��h�j �9-gV Name(Please print): EL vAp Mat/Sao A Address: 36130 I a'/2 R l)G C kd Phone: E?5 �a� ?c p9' _ Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: r Date: _ Z � _ �y Name(Please print): r"--(e-f e \ pc\cN Address: 3$ `r1e-c c'. X etk-�t > c C 1C. Phone: Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism, verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: L (i ( ( ert-CrLC>CC'<`� Date: �'�;� / 57 c}' Name(Please print): LHLIR/C eTLOLc-'t7L_/Z Address: _3QiC Td r/71 b>`/'/"/ ere e D Phone: j �7 (-'O4 Comments: Y August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de•sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association ;would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signet / / Agisean >i Date: 8 • a / 4711 al Name(Please print): V" U/✓/i//G / Ni L, c-S,/4/V /CO Address: 3 e-5-c 77 eLL,9_/ DC NJ Phone: mt bQ, f4/j' (-A--- ?3ca/ Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: L t Date: _ ( >)/ Name(Please print): � we V rt KICK-- Address: ICKAddress: 3 "/O (2.0. Phone: YO 57.5-3/ / — Comments: August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: k lU Date: Name(Please print): �� V/, ( ly,/his(i2 rz Address: 31 e;(- m ' . csr i! c._. -,� b. r4 : Phone: "Si <. - Comments: 1 August 25, 1994 Dear Mayor Lawrason,Council Members,and Staff: We as members of the Belmont Homeowners Association support the permanent closure of access through the gate located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Shadyridge. We believe that allowing access through this gate has resulted in disturbing incidents within our community or vandalism,verbal harassment and other related criminal activity. As our concerns for safety continue to rise, we ask the city council for immediate attention to this matter and to consider our request for permanent closure of gate access. Our homeowner association would also like to play an important role in the planning process of park-related issues including making decisions on landscaping, lighting and park activities. Signature: &,r4S— ! Date: 8 tc.., Name(Please print): CR(dl�c1f -r U�N� C5'j 1�/ r1 -7 Address: 3Th 'Th YX10,(i9( vAr c - c0V(ycn t� Ch_"l3t Lam( Phone: TOcl SZ9 — /-ra9 C V ` Comments: r gAve SA ene,je wa 5 joys A 6 44 &l ke vt v i A 11 vtA U \o c.Ott A bu3 t , l>.\ c pe, jV\cry hoot\ lids . December 30. 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 1q , / December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet, is smaller in size thafthepfoposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 1/ 4// f� de r r / /e2C'r Par /� �� December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller,at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 4• ///y December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. it involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collectors Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, i& r/ c�3 4r, -12 p LID‘ r' L 7-- 7i1.10oh evlYzK 6/4 136,,_:11 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is sm ller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, ' ; (:(tft. ,'_ '-}, /if-)4 . 72/) dt-5,1 , i t j ./ ,. 7 /1/3 7 ,akiti e Zee&e /71-, bii/174 i2'�r .lL� ,i` v4- `I 3 Ute-l December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a communify, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 24-ValC /// S /3-6-1 z ,) ccu C)R , 7/CO(Z f L < c4 `7 3 0 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 souare feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, y71 ( a(A/ 4-42eR-i /1 AJ 2tI ELL MY3 �CM3 rz z1 R December 30, 1994 )°14.)-1-11-5-ES ----I-43 Q Moorpark City Council /P/Ce-6-1--(2- (b,) Moorpark City Hall I . 799 Moorpark Avenue ai Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largestijnit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" Concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, / //S29 recti-dic&) c7 Mca??Merl CA- gaoa/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5. at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincer )l3 g y l� e tet 'c".-- (' . December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average$320,000.00 per unit. However,the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, lA3 `7�, zJ , December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collectors Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely — ,• \ 'J\\%- December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. in part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the ity Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any oup of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincer ly, 3<63 1Ilii62y7t2l 4aCIC—, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, Di 0% ,14111A2-K62-- (A) 1-,rsww,-OZw {— 116 37 Ce,,c-ny77 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, ,, �� C.,c �LKE 11523 7tcd/EW CT Mamie chi y.&02 December 30, 1094 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, • (f/f- i,dh )(-(F/C / //Z,.%'! UI) 1 /11`/ c/ 15 s C ~ . ICI December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincere) t % L/291. illaea � ` a / mega, C� y 24 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However,they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square Jolla Smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collectors Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, A 4 _k 010J\ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However,they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at1954 square feet. is smiler in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3-Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, C,�z y� _sem �� 6L�� . 55 / J ,ito( December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, tl(i 7"I/iikw �� .� /Z yecpowAy q3o/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition.homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, I ( 3 &r. Tho02P ✓- December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 4. / ( IP /r-L---7 -/c:7;-- -6t------'\::,-• / _ (J �/ f / .5 6 t fL of yir:l12 h, &k 9,,._;(,) -1/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However,they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincer/4, d(2)(‘ §(0-7CFs/4iy.46{ ( 7-; %1r / - a,. jS(- / December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincere)i J 411.4 Ar a,. Ie. vY . g 'kMr . o z December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 souare feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller,at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, ll/fr1 I/Laia7,114/1.4e `��..429rd IL M 'MO z/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average$320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, a7/i/ / 5', hs\ytc, ) .s : 1 ) -2A k slIc4}ticsidttt .-....-.. -f;, f''�1 f7 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However,they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, /Yff/A-61,i-Ztifetettj /j/ik(;11 ..16‘11,4.VJ e44< - December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed larg st mit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, /„.. December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 scuare feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 4d 79 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet is smaller in size than the proposed larg t unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collectors Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, r • V51 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However,the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, ►rtnt2s (2Ad -a+ 0A Sn,tfh !I/ / I fraeer,dc Hca fir)0r,i)rit k C A g576,3j December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adve y effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Since ly, j/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However,they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the Proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, Ri,_ I Il'f re rat LxV,`dgc- Pei lrl)ortu-, k Cr4 9ev2/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hail 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. it involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feel is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, Iles 7'02x1.,40-ei MooR4,A Rrc , GA q.c 2 i December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No, 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is Smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 11 Z-I 7—/f4112:4/2(/.1 72 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 sauare feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, c4 Slat- --- t,rgCei-r �g_� 1 e ( ni(h..�L Co1'ikc r-c " tioj Clog-) December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, n II -S3 Teeeacce,och � Rd (Loi ?7 ) )4001ap13eK.1 (A 93a 2f December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet_is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, X9.4- ✓�,1 f/W 9 lilVergI X/W. :401�%� ',/ 7:4, �3() -1 _ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 'J/Zchid ✓✓t-:.r./ , Dv✓�c✓l'ci rfi 93oz I December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#S.snt 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, cam. �1 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 squace feet.is smaller in size_thafthe proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, qi(e( oq tAK)c .v k. i C q December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller i11 size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 777/Lel /1/ 71 77-1/e/2,901,/.41).P i e c x,i¢,eR; (1, 9-1°.4 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, �J gal/emr/cc" < (a r � oi-rav L (4 93oL/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 squa[e_feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, • /-\ IIS61 k 4:LL Ce December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller,at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our commurity. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collectors Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, .j / =�-' / 2. `,/-G � O //( � /f4/��1'Lt- ,.. - " 7‘../ ;::,---;" 2- ,:. " � _. c; December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, / � 5 /7 //e-f/e- '(7 ('‘ Z/7‘,7— C A 'DU/"C°' December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However,the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the Promised largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, o & cA° OC IL4 `/Osj hvenrn,r(9P Ci- 977flW f k C ,7 9100.1 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, y /77 XcJ = wc_ // / 91 --�� -,e c,e-/4hb- December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to$215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, /� v l�` iIAc�tiis 4 Q, (- �� D6--t (1 0 C �. . c13 cr) December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1, Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sinter ,71: A.)Zir-r) � • �� f &Wilk& 11 "1 I.Q V\ck,cF/ cfpj . December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square.feet. is smaller in size thartthe proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, la•---7( CJ'T91("j'"Q:42_ 1 HE 7 rrocPr1005 c �`'1 a r, 1' J C 3 c> 2/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately $30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately $215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 1152 -ewc_e.e,idv Nouti CA 902! December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities,the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to$180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, /r I 11519 fretoiezo et. l /oorpc R , CA 93021 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However,the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 15:11 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. if approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" condept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, ., o.� we- 413 — _ Com- . P Fa_ L) C 3 oz‘ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However,the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, (2, / .-.t` (c 1 J d / December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, • /72?S ie,ricZgcQ L'D_ 9?? December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark.jSin erely, 1A-L) t45-1( --.. 0 ' 1"s 0 Lr (,Lem IL buo0 G 0(L. December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved,this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, H371 CU=fRWOldl) RP mooRPmrIc cn . 930z.1 December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a"planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller,at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. ' / `_ Y J / i7 _ i / ( ar �/�� Joh' December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 21p l Yi / vt 64JV December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to$180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 1 / �L,gfe �r1ii �y December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to $180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, PC 1 CL i &'Qui Rvct 61 PLO orq KR_ c 01 G vy aN� 5- uuS4-h OC-hro/ I/ ' / December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units and approximately 138 triplex units planned. The single family units will be available in three sized between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. The triplex units will also be available in three sizes between approximately 1135 and 1537 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $140,000 to$180,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the adjacent properties,as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently,we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, l'r. g . !7 - . .P11T7 1 9234/ AAtpit,/lu� 077 . �j ,CCe2D,aizx C.e 4— y/ December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3- Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average$320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collector's Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet. is smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller,at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community"concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept"of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely,(� • Q/./1 l L CLc j(,. ll", C64 C'DczE /2D, December 30, 1994 Moorpark City Council Moorpark City Hall 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4637, (Major Modification No. 1), Residential Planned Development Permit No. 89-4, (Major Modification No. 1), and Zone Change 93-3 - Urban West Communities Dear City Council Members: The above referenced development modification has been submitted to the City of Moorpark by Urban West Communities, the developer of West Ranch/Mountain Meadows and our homes in Belmont. It involves the property adjacent to the fire station at the entrance to the development that was originally planned for luxury town homes, and which would be located across the street from Traditions. Originally this particular site was designated for luxury town homes. The planned retail list on these homes was to average $320,000.00 per unit. However, the developer is now asking the city to approve a modification and zoning change to allow for a different type(s) of unit to be built. In part of the proposed modification there are approximately 98 single family detached units planned, at a density of 7.65 units per acre. There will be three sizes of this unit available between approximately 1505 to 1987 square feet. The approximate retail price will range from $195,000 to $215,000. These units are similar in size and density to the Belmont Collectors Edition homes which are 1954, 2124, and 2203 square feet. However, they will be significantly less expensive. For example, a Belmont#5 at 1954 square feet.js smaller in size than the proposed largest unit. Even though the Belmont is smaller, at a retail price of $245,000 it is approximately$30,000 more than the proposed detached single family unit at approximately$215,000. This proposed modification of the original plans for West Ranch/Mountain Meadows represents a significant deviation from the original site plan and has the potential for a significant impact on our community. If approved, this development modification may potentially: 1. Decrease the real estate valuation of all adjacent properties. 2. Dramatically impact resale opportunities among the Belmont Collector's Edition properties, as well as ripple through each of the areas of the development. 3. Decrease the taxable base through a reduction of property values. We purchased our homes as part of a "planned community" concept. In this type of community, certain protections are offered to homeowners that are expressed within the context of that stated planning. Those protections are attractive to us as we consider that they function as safeguards to our investments, as well as guarantees of certain neighborhood standards. Our transactions were essentially then a purchase of a "concept" of a community, not just the purchase of a solitary structure or home. Consequently, we urge the City Council to deny any modification to the original plan by Urban West that would adversely effect any group of homeowners and the city of Moorpark. Sincerely, 7/.2/1 � //7—ei-n-1/0-74 -2—