HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0406 CC REG ITEM 08Dkcm
FROM:
DATE:
ITEM $• 1) -
AGENDA I- 2EPORT
C Z TY O F MOOR PARK
The Honorable City Council
Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Work
March 29, 1994 ( Meeting of' 4-6-94)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 94 - 1) Approving the
Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2;
2) Declaring Intention to Make Certain Changes to and
Ordering the Annual Assessments for Said Assessment
District for FY 1994/95; and, 3) Setting the Date and
Times of a Public Meeting and a Public Hearing to Consider
Said Assessments.
OVERVIEW
This presents for approval a Resolution approving the Engineer's
Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and setting the dates of a
Public Meeting to discuss the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for
FY 1994/95, and a public hearing to :onsider the levy of assessments
for District for next fiscal year.
The amount of the assessments proposed in the Engineer's Report are
based on a preliminary budget and Fund Activity detail which has
been developed by staff. That and other related information is
attached hereto and identified as f,-ALows
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
"A ":
Assessment Summary
Exhibit
"B":
Fund Activity Summary
Exhibit
"C":
Zone Activity Summary
Exhibit
"D ":
Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95
Exhibit
"E":
Capital Improvement Project Summary
Exhibit
"F ":
Street Light Cost Summary
Exhibit
"G":
Engineer's Report
Exhibit
"H":
Public Hearinq Notice
Exhibit
"I ":
Resolution
adfl4- 95. ^pt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement
expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the
act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are
two types of district expenses, generally described as follows:
• those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the
community, which are spread to a 1 1 of the lots in the City; and,
those expenses for the construction and maintenance of
improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties
within a number of identified zones, which are spread to all of
the lots within each zone.
The Citywide expenses are distributed to all of the properties in
the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the
basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of
factors (including lighting intensity; lighting security, people
use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then
weights those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits
derived.
Except for Zones 7 and 9, the zone expenses are distributed equally
between the non - exempt parcels in each zone. In that the sizes of
the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the expenses for those
zones are spread to each non - exempt parcel via a per acre
assessment.
The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape
maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each
year since the formation of the district.
DISCUSSION
A. Resolution of Intent
On January 5, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
994 initiating the proceedings required to consider the levy of
assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY 1994/95. On that date the City
Council also selected the firm of Dwight French and Associates
to prepare the Engineer's Report for the district.
,d84-9--pt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 3
B. Tentative Assessment Summary
The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84 -2 for FY
1994/95 are set forth in Exhibit 'A'. A summary of that
information is as follows:
1. City -Wide Assessment -- Those expenses considered to be of
general benefit to the community include street lighting
expenses and landscape maintenance expenses for a number of
parkways and medians. A comparison of the annual City -wide
assessment for a single - family Lot is as follows:
Actual Proposed
Elements FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
Landscape Maintenance $11.45 $16.40
Street Lighting L11.55 $20.64
Total $ ;3.00 $37.04
2. Zone of Benefit
Assessments
-- Those expenses for the
maintenance of improvements determined
to
be of benefit to
the
properties within an identified zone,
are spread to all
of
the lots within that zone.
A re -cap
of the proposed
annual
assessment
for each Zone
of Benefit
is as follows:
C` FY 199394
C FY 1994/95
Number Tota.
Per Lot
Total Per Lot
Zone
Tract
of Lots Assessment
Assessment
Assessment Assessment
1
2851
73 A
:33.92
4,131 56.59
2
2865
622 1'
28.41
59,367 95.45
3
3032
265 10�
5.30
846 3.20
4
3274
129 L 1.'
93.94
0 0
5
3019/3525
217 i 41,
/9.91
37,338 172.06
6
3306
22 '
30.82
242 11.00
7
Industrial Park
92 8"
33.55
10,581 111.46
NE of L. A. Ave &
per acre
Gabbert Rd
8
4340, 4341 & 4342
497 10 ,2'
20.53
693
10,223 14.75
8
Home Acres
200 16,,23
51.11
10,223 51.11
9
Condor Parkway
11
0
6,000 121.92
per acre
.ad N4 -9S. rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 4
3. New Zone -- On December 15, 1993, the City Council reviewed
an alignment study prepared for Virginia Colony Drive and
decided to leave the alignment as it now exists. As a part
of that action, the City Council directed staff to take steps
to enable the City Council to consider the creation of a new
Zone of Benefit to include the properties within the
Industrial Park located on Condor Drive. Said new Zone of
Benefit was to be established to allow for the levy of
assessments on those properties to fund the improvement and
maintenance of the unimproved parkway located at the
northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony
Place. As you may recall, the Conditions of Approval for the
Industrial Park required the developer to construct and
maintain landscape improvements in this parkway and other
areas in the industrial park complex. However, the POA
established for this area failed to provide for the proper
maintenance of these landscape improvements and the
landscaping eventually died. The Engineer's Report includes
the addition of Zone 9 to levy assessments for the
improvement and maintenance of this area. It is recommended
that a $6,000 improvement assessment be levied for the
construction of the parkway improvements during FY 1994/95.
4. Per Acre Assessment -- There is a considerable variation in
the size of the industrial properties located in Zone 9. It
is recommended, therefore, that the total assessment for
Zone 9 be spread to all of the parcels in Zone 9 on a per
acre basis. It is recommended that the total assessment to
be levied on the industrial properties located within Zone 7
also be spread to the parcels in that Zone in the same
manner. A tentative listing of the assessment amounts for
the parcels in Zones 7 and 9 ar( listed in Exhibit W.
5. Zone Activity -- A more detailed description of the Fund
Activity for each Zone of Benefit is set forth below in
SECTION D of this report.
C. Fund Activity
Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B', is a summary of
the Fund Activity for AD 84 -2 for FY 1992/93, FY 1993/94 and
FY 1994/95. The amount of the FY 1994/95 revenue identified in
Exhibit 'B' is the amount required to fund the expenditures
summarized in the Preliminary Budget attached as Exhibit 'D'.
[Exhibit 'D' is discussed in more detail below.] This revenue
requirement was the basis for determining the proposed FY
1994/95 assessments summarized in Exhibit W.
ad80- 95.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 5
D. Zone Activity Summary
Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a summary of the revenues and
expenditures for each Zone of Benefit over the past several
years. This exhibit shows the year -end surplus and /or deficit
for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion
of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows:
Zone 1: The amount of the assessment has been reduced from
$9,776 to $4,131. This is due to a $1,944 carry over
resulting in part from an over estimate of FY 1993/94
expenses.
Zone 2:
Maintenance Deficit -- The amount of the FY 1992/93
maintenance assessment was $50,500. Last year at this
time, it was thought that this assessment amount was
too high and that it would result in an FY 1993/94
Beginning Balance of $9,671. Accordingly, the FY
1993/94 assessment was reduced considerably to only
$17,671. The actual FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance
turned out to be only $4,609. This combined with
current year -end expenditures expected to be more than
$4,000 higher than the amount budgeted, is anticipated
to result in a year -end deficit of $9,207. This
deficit, added to the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures
will require a FY 1994/95 assessment of $43,882.
• Debris Basin Maintenance -- Phe projected FY 1994/95
expenses include an amount of $1,000 for the
maintenance of the debris basins located on the south
perimeter of Tract 286 .
Improvement Deficit -- Phis year the City undertook and
completed the restoration of the Tierra Rejada Slope
east of Peach Hill Road and the construction of the
Sunnyslope Debris Basin Access Road. The cost of these
two projects exceeded the amount of the available
improvements assessments by $9,265. Pursuant to the
direction of the City Council, it is proposed that this
improvement deficit be recovered by adding a like
amount to the proposed 'one 2 assessments for FY
1994/95.
ad6A- 99.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 6
Zone 2 (cont.):
• Additional Improvement Assessment -- It is also
proposed that an additional assessment of $10 per lot
($6,220 annual total) be levied for three years to fund
the construction of parkway improvements on the south
side of Tierra Rejada Road west of Spring Road.
Zone 3: The proposed FY 1994/95 assessment is slightly less
than last year due to a beginning balance which was
higher than expected.
Zone 4: Last year at this time, it was thought that FY 1993/94
Beginning Balance would show a deficit of $3,685.
Accordingly, the FY 1993/94 assessment was increased to
$12,118, a considerable increase over the prior year
assessment of $4,212. The actual FY 1993/94 Beginning
Balance turned out to be a positive fund balance of
$774. This increase in available funds, combined with
the fact that current year -end expenditures are
expected to be more than $4,400 less than the amount
budgeted, will result in a year -end positive fund
balance of $8,901. In that the estimated FY 1994/95
expenditures are only $4,059, it is anticipated that
there will be a FY 1994/95 year -end balance of $4,806.
Accordingly, no FY 1.994/9' assessment is proposed.
Zone 5: FY 1993/94 expenditures are anticipated to be
approximately $8,000 more than the amount budgeted.
This combined with an anticipated FY 1993/94 Beginning
Balance which is approximately $1,000 less than
expected, will result in a FY 1993/94 year -end deficit
of $8,993. This deficit, added to the FY 1994/95
projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $37,318.
Zone 6: Although the projectea expenses are over $800, the
assessment amount is only $242 due to a carry over
surplus from last year
Zone 7: FY 1993/94 expenditures are anticipated to be
approximately $3,000 more than the amount budgeted.
This combined with an anticipated FY 1993/94 Beginning
Balance which is approximately $300 less than expected,
will result in a FY 1993/94 year -end deficit of $3,206.
This deficit, added to the FY 1994/95 projected
expenditures will require a FY 1994/95 assessment of
$10,581, a considerablE' increase over prior years.
nd84- 95.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 7
Zone 8: This Zone provides for the construction and maintenance
of the Buffer Area at the west end of Tract 4341. The
costs are shared on a fifty-fifty basis between the
properties in the Home Acres area and all of the
residential property In Tracts 4340, 4341 and 4342.
Commercial property has been excluded from the
boundaries of this Zone.
• Addition of Multi - Family Residential Units -- In prior
years only the single - family residential lots in Tracts
4340, 4341 and 4342 were assessed. Consistent with the
original intent, it is recommended that the City
portion of the Zone 8 assessment be spread to all of
the approved residential units in the affected area.
The total number of residential untis approved for this
area is as follows:
• Single Family residential........ 497
• Multi- family residential.......... 196
Total 693
• Improvement Assessments -- It is proposed that the
total assessment remain unchanged, but that $1,200 of
that assessment be identified as a maintenance
assessment. The remainder of the improvement
assessment is anticipated to provide sufficient funds
to construct the proposed improvements. Any surplus
improvement assessment will be used to fund future
maintenance costs.
• Maintenance Assessment -- It is proposed that a
maintenance assessment in the amount of $1,200 be
levied on the properties in this Zone for the first
time. This amount is based on an estimated maintenance
cost of $400 per month for three (3) months.
Zone 9: As discussed above, an improvement assessment in the
amount of $6,000 is proposed to be levied on the
properties within the condor Drive Industrial Park. It
is proposed that these parkway improvements be
constructed during FY 1`-gVc4 =5.
,A84 -". rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 8
E. Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95
Attached as Exhibit. 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for
Parkway Lighting and Landscaping for FY 1994/95.
1. Operations & Maintenance (O &M) -- The budget amount proposed
for O &M for FY 1994/95 ($385,780) is $26,669 more than the
approved O &M Budget for FY 1993/94 ($359,111). This amount
of increase is roughly comparable to the proposed increase in
the Citywide assessment shown on page 2 of Exhibit 'A'. Said
increase in expenditures is the result of adding four new
landscaped parkways to the improvements to be maintained by
AD 84 -2. Those added areas are listed as follows:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Millard 5t.:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave..,
• Prkwy: Poindexter / Sierra Ave.; and,
• Prkwy: E/S Spring Rd.; S/O Peach Hill Rd.
2. City -wide Landscape Improvements -- A complete list of the
City -wide landscape improvements maintained by AD 84 -2 is
listed as follows:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Millard -3t.:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave.;
• Prkwy: Poindexter / Sierra Ave.; and,
• Prkwy: E/S Spring Rd., S/O Peach Hill Rd.
• Prkwy: W/S Collins N/O Campus Park Dr.;
• Median: Campus Park Dr. (Collins to Pecan);
• Median: Campus Park Dr. (Pecan to Julliard);
• Prkwy: S/W Cor. Spring & Peach Hill;
• Prkwy: E/S Peach Hill NIO Monte Vista Park;
• Median: Tierra Rejada Rd (Spring to L. A. Ave.):
3. Street Lighting -- The cost of street lighting is included in
the utility costs shown in Exhibit 'D'. The proposed cost
for street lighting for FY 19g4/91_' is $190,000 (see Exhibit
'F' for details).
4. Zones of Benefit -- The cost of maintaining the landscaping
funded by Zones of Benefit are included in the total budget
set forth in Exhibit 'D'. For details regarding costs refer
to Exhibit 'C'.
HdN4- 91.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 9
F. Capital Improvements
Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary proposed capital
improvement projects funded by AD 84
1. FY 1993/94: Proposed year -end capital project expenditures
are listed on page 1 of Exhibit 'E'.
a. City -wide Capital Construction: The projects to be
constructed i.n FY 1993/94 are listed as follows:
• L. A. Ave. / Millard St..;
• L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave.;
• Poindexter / Sierra Ave.; and,
• Spring Rd / Peach Hill Rd.
b. Design: In addition, design costs for future projects are
included in the year -end anticipated expenditures.
c. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
year -end City -wide capital improvement costs are
anticipated to be $57,450 This leaves an estimated year-
end capital project carrti over of $46,365.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital Improvement Costs: Also recapped
here are the total Zone capital improvements costs for FY
1993/94, amounting to $6" 903.
e. Total Capital Improvement costs: The total year -end
capital improvement costs for AD 84 -2 is estimated to be
$125,355 (57,450 + 67,9011
2. FY 1994/95: Proposed capital project expenditures for next
year are listed on page 2 of Exhibit 'E'.
a. City -wide Capital Construction Projects: The projects
proposed to be constructed next year are listed as
follows:
• Medians:
Princeton
Ave.
$40,000
• Parkway:
Princeton
Ave.
$37,000
• Parkway:
S/S Campus
Drive E/O Princeton;
$30,000
• Parkway:
E/S Peach
Hill S/O Mesa Verde;
$35,000
• Parkway:
S/S L. A.
Ave.: E/n T. R. Rd.;
$20,000**
$162,000
Note: ** This project is r.- arti.Ally funded by a prior Griffin Homes deposit.
ad84- g9.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 10
b. Total City -wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
recommended FY 1994/95 Budget for the above listed Capital
improvement projects is $162,000. The funding for this
level of effort is as follows:
• Prior Year Carry Over $46,365
• Prior Year Capital Project Set Aside $97,576
• Other Remaining Maintenance Surplus $18,224
$162,165
c. Deferred Projects: The following projects are recommended
to be deferred due to lack of funding:
• Parkway: Campus Park Drive, W/O Princeton Ave.;
• Parkway: Peach Hill F. /O Mesa Verde;
• Parkway: W/S Spring, S/0 Peach Hill Rd.;
d. Zone of Benefit Capital improvement Costs: Also recapped
here is the proposed construction of the Home Ares Buffer
Area (Zone 8) for an estimated amount of $54,135. Any
surplus improvement assessments will be used to fund
future maintenance costs
e. Zone of Benefit Capital Carry Overs: The Zone 2
improvement assessment of $6,220 for future parkway
improvements to the south side of Tierra Rejada Road will
be carried over and combined with future improvement
assessments to fund these future improvements.
G. Engineer's Report
The above described expenditure information was provided to the
Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation
of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G'). Said report
sets for the proposed amount of the assessment for FY 1994/95
for various land use categories, along with an explanation of
the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information.
H. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public, hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed
to each property being assessed. However, consistent with
past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
,d84- 9S.rpt
AD84 -2 Engineer's Report
April 1994
Page 11
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assessment, a public hearinq notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment. The amount of the approved
estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the
notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty -five (45)
days prior to the date of the hearing. Although the Notice
may be postmarked April 15, 1994, the content of the notice
must be finalized by April 8. L994. to allow sufficient time
for printing and handling.
4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or
increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to
allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed
increased assessment. It is recommended that this Public
Meeting be convened on Monday, May 16, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers. This will be an informal meeting
conducted by staff for the purpose of providing answers to
questions regarding projected program costs and the methods
used to spread those costs to the properties assessed.
5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' is a copy of the Public Hearing
Notice for AD84 -2. Said Notice sets the time and place of
both the Public Meeting (May 1.6, 1994, at 7:00 p.m.) and the
public hearing (June 1, 1994, at &:00 p. m.). The date of
the public hearing is date of the first. City Council meeting
in June as required by law.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
(Exhibit "I ") 1) approving the Engineer's Report for Assessment
District AD84 -2; 2) declaring intention to make certain changes to
and ordering the annual assessments for said assessment district for
FY 1994/95; and, 3) setting the dates and times of a PUBLIC MEETING
and a public hearing to consider said assessments.
ed84- 95.rpt
EXHIBIT "A" (page 1) 31- Mar -94
Fiscal Year 1994195
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
-------------- - - - - --
TOTAL
E 92,,4 3
FY 93 %94
FY 94/95
Description
"Ctuat
Budget
Proposed
i
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES
U, n3
533,912
i•
I! 630!815 j
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE EXPENSES
169,49
(84,0571
(144,590)
i
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CITY -WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENST
223,455)
)156,455)
(162,000) I
PLUS PROPOSED CITYWIDE IMPROVEMNET ASSESSMENTS
0
0
0
LESS RESERVES
) -,7,345)
0
0 .I
li
NET CITY WIDE COSTS
-- - - - - --
300,:14
----- - - - - --
293,400
----- - - - - --
324,225
TOTAL CITY -WIDE ASSESSMENTS
30Ci,,.14
293,400
j�
324,225 li
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT FOR ALL ZONES
128,806
---- - -
82,520
138,950
j
TOTAL
ASSESSMENTS
- - --
429 '20
----- - - - - --
375,920
---- - - - - --
I�
463,175
I
EXHIBIT °A" (page 2)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1993!99
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY -- ------- --- - -- --- -
____________________ A !i
SF Res
Description Assmnt(S) Total
Citywide Assessment
------------- - - - - --
33.00 29:,9
Zone Assessments
31- Mar -94
FY 1994;95
------------------------
C D
SF Res
ASSmnt(5) Total ($) Notes
37.04 324,225 A!B : C/D
C = (AXD) / B
--------------
- - - - --
Per Lot
Tota:
Per Lot
Total
No.
i of Lots
Assent($)
Assent S)
Assent(5)
Assent($)
- - - --
1
------ - - - - --
"13
--- - - - - --
133.92
--- - - - - --
+.
----- - - - - --
56.59
---- - - - - --
4,131
2
622
28.41
1',r
95.45
59,367
3
265
5.30
i;, 7
3.20
846
4
129
93.94
12..
0.00
0
5
217
79.91
1: 10
172.06
37,338
6
22
30.82
11.00
242
7
92
33.55
=
**
10,581
8
2u, 15
20,445
(City) 498
20.53
20.53
(Home Acres 200
51.11
51.11
9
11
NiA
N
**
6,000
Total All Zones
2..,'0
138,950
** See per
parcel 4.creage Assesment on :,ages 4
5.
EXHIBIT "A" i,page 31
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Remarks
31- Mar -94
Total
lotal
Per Acre
Total
Zone
Assessment
acres
Assessment
A P
Acres
Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5i1 -,;- 061 -)15
1.680
187.26
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-o-061-U5
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5il -!- 061 -035
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -1-061 -045
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -t.1- 061--055
1.160
129.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -.1- 061 -065
1.130
125.95
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -u -061 -075
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -0- 061 -085
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -u -061 115
1.060
118.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -u -061 155
2.130
237.42
,
10,581.00
9.1.93
111.46
1.170
130.41
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1.270
141.56
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51: -u -Ub -165
2.750
306.53
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51i -u -�h -1 'S
2.830
315.44
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
2.940
327.71
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`'.:- -�e: 2 ?5
1.227
136.77
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51!-!. -Ue -245
3.072
342.42
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5.000
557.32
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.547
60.97
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
li- �;- u6� -2 "5
1.100
122.61
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1.080
120.38
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`1L -i- 06._-295
1.260
140.45
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
' .11
1.330
148.25
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11-u -06 -':5
1.150
128.18
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
ii- t'- 06. -'.•45
3.080
343.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
li- (!- )6-, -'S
3.930
438.06
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
li -1 -U6 -i£5
2.020
225.16
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11- ,, -!7- -1. 130
2.530
282.01
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11 -�- 7 -040
5.180
577.39
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11 -) -U7' -450
3.300
367.83
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11 -i -:7' -485
2.550
284.23
1
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.500
55.73
7
10, 581.00
94.93
111.46
', 1 1 -. i -.T -5010
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
-)11- i- (!71 -5LO
0.490
54.62
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.461.1
1-520
0.520
57.96
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
-)1;- U- (! " /!, -530
0.950
105.89
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
i1 -u -07 -540
0.710
79.14
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
:1:,- ) -U'" -;55
1.670
186.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1: -) -li? -565
0.860
95.86
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
0.339
37.79
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
I:. -585
0.239
26.64
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
ti!.- -)" -595
0.239
26.64
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1.100
122.61
Remarks
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "A" (page 4)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Remarks
31- Aar -94
Total
Total
Per Acre
Total
?one
Assessment
Acres
Assessment
A P ?
Acres
Assessment
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5i1- -0''0 -615
0.800
89.17
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -0''0-625
1.169
130.30
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-1-0:0-613b
0.610
67.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -00-645
0.339
37.79
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
5ii-- ? -U'10 -655
0.530
59.08
7
101581.00
94.93
111.46
51i- !-0''0 -665
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511-.;-0:0-6,5
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51! -' -0 "U 685
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511- -i- ii'0.695
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -'-11'0 7)5
0.469
52.28
7
10,581.00
114.93
111.46
1(;- "15
0.480
53.50
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51: -! -( 1- ?80
0.839
93.52
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51r -15! 065
0.510
56.85
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -]5] 0 "'5
0.180
20.06
7
10,581.00
44.93
111.46
511 -'Si 085
0.600
66.88
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51( + -15! -095
0.700
?8.03
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
51; -:-151 li!5
0.580
64.65
1.
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`;11 -.5! 115
0.680
75.80
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1>1 -:3i 125
0.550
61.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`:l -.5 1 ?5
0.650
72.45
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
ii- .6;-145
0.200
22.29
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1; +' -.5, 1`,5
0.550
61.31
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
il.,.,- :6:-025
0.412
45.92
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1.11 x-:61 -045
0.464
51.72
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1; -t6; 055
0.324
36.11
7
10,581.00
x4.93
111.46
1; - .61 -Ub5
0.292
32.55
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
-:b1 -085
0.329
36.67
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
^i. - -:61 -095
0.295
32.88
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`1: - 6. !!)5
0.274
30.54
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1, -.6. .5
0.261
29.09
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1! ! -t6i i'S
0.292
32.55
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
l: -i6; ii5
0.534
59.52
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
11 !- .b; -i55
0.580
64.65
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
43.14
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
`1;- :6i -,'S
0.287
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
ii i- ,b, - ;35
0.28?
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
i, i -l6 -195
0.287
31.99
7
10,581.00
94.9;
111.46
-i6; -205
0.414
46.15
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46-
in. -,'15
0.492
54.84
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
i -!6, -225
0.440
49.04
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
,1, l -.6. -255
1.240
138.22
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
1, i- b, 15
0.687
76.58
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
- b -`)45
0.704
78.47
Remarks
31- Aar -94
EXHIBIT
"A" (page 5)
31- Mar -94
Fiscal
Year 1994/95
AD 84 -2
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary
of Acreage Assessments
---------------------------------
Total
Iotal
Per Acre
Total
Zone
Assessment
Acres
Assessment
z P e
Acres
Assessment Remarks
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 - -i -162 -055
0.340
37.90
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -,.1- 162 -065
0.530
59.08
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 -;.,- 162 -0'?5
0.330
36.78
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511 - -.)- 162-085
0.440
49.04
7
10,581.00
94.93
111.46
511.1 -1F)2 095
0.340
37.90
`onE 'o*al
--- - - - - --
94.927
---- - - - - --
10,581.00
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
5if -u -060 -035
1.000
121.92
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -1i- 060 -075
11.780
1436.18
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -0-060 -085
0.000
Exempt
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
51--1- 060 -095
3.860
470.60
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -11- 060-125
1.020
124.35
9
Exempt
-
0
513-11- 060 -D5
0.000
Exempt
9
Exempt
--
0
513-x,- 060 -145
0.000
Exempt
9
Exempt
--
0
5131-1- 060-155
0.000
Exempt
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
1.860
226.76
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
513 -i -060 -185
1.360
165.81
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
"!,-(.1-060-245
4.980
607.14
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
' >i: -o -06(1-255
5.380
655.91
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
�i--, -) -06s' -265
16.080
1960.42
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
A., 1- 06(1 -2"'S
0.889
108.38
9
6,000.00
49.21
121.92
) -061 <8`
1.005
122.53
on I -a
--- - - - - --
49.214
---- - - - - --
6,000.00
EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2
Fund 23 Activity
Description
BEGINNING BALANCE
TRANSFERS IN
REVENUE
AVAILABLE FUNDS
EXPENSES
Personnel
0 &M
Capital Improvements
Less TOTAL EXPENSES
YEAR END BALANCE
03:31!94
18,250
In, i
FY 1993;94
FY 1994 ?95
FY
FY
- --------- ------ - - - - --
Proposed
1991;92
1992-
Budget Proj Actual
Budget Notes:
264,973
125,355
X15, h2 315,362
178,831
389
533,412
0 0
0
332,679
449,1 -4
357,()06 354,413
463,175
597,652
05. a+
672,';68 669,775
642,006
18,250
In, i
i8,;46
20,000
22,900
323,217
324,(, -1
359,111
345,589
385,780
0
49:.•5
156,445
125,355
222,135
341,467
389
533,412
490,944
630,815
256,185
315
138,4oh
178,831
11,191
LESS SET ASIDES:
Reserved for Buffer Impr. (Zone 8)
Future Capital Improvements
Unexpendid Budgeted Capital Projects
Reserved Zone 2 Impr. Assmnt (N /S T. R. Rd. Prkwav)
Surplus Zone 4 Maintenance Assessment
YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS
(20.445' (40,8901 (34,8901
197 576) (97,576)
(46,3651
(6,220)
(4,806)
2a4 0 165
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
32,419
3h,0 0
271,342
22,280
03!31194
Paqe 1
Less Actual Expenditures
46,779
FY 1993/94
2 -', 12
FY 1994/95
34,675
FY
FY
- ----- ----------
- - - - --
Proposed
Description
1991!92
1992 +i
Budget Proj
Actual
Budget FY 199405 Assessment
ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood
-------------------------------------------------------
! Flood Control
Channel
- - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------
* Prior Yr.
------------------------ - - - - --
Maintenance
deficit » 9,265
Prior Year Carry Over
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
52,ti40
)2111'
(1,819)
1,944
Plus Assessments
6,773
4, "' ?6
9,776
4,131 >>>>>>>>>>> 4,131
Budgeted Expenditures
--- - - - - --
6,773
- - - - -- --
--- - - - - -- -----
+,5b5
- - - - --
7,957
---- - - - - --
6,075
Less Actual Expenditures
5,498
',''`
+,565
6,013
6,075
Zone 1 Balance
1,275
).,h.
Less Actual Expenditures
1,944
0
ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N 0 T R Rd ** N/S T R qd Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett & Spring
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14,3h0) 9,h•1 4,609 (9,207)
Plus Assessments 32,419 50,5)0 17,t, ?1 17,671 43,882 Naint Asmt: 43,882
Budgeted Expenditures
32,419
3h,0 0
271,342
22,280
34,675
1,846
Less Actual Expenditures
46,779
31,`.t
2 -', 12
31,487
34,675
1,009
Zone 2 Maint. Balance
(14,360)
: r a
(9,207)
0
Improvements
* Prior Yr.
------------------------ - - - - --
deficit » 9,265
Prior Year Carry Over
52,640
52,tli)
52,ti40
52,640
19,265)
Plus Assessments
0
0
0
15,485
* S/S T. R. Rd
--- - - - - --
- -- -- --
- - -- --
----- - - - - --
---- - - - - --
Prkwy $10 /1ot
Budgeted Expenditures
52,640
52,640
6,220
for 4 Years
Less Actual Expenditures
»>>>>> 6,220
S/S T. R. Rd Parkway
---- - - - - --
Peach Hill Slope 0 31,000 32,077 0 Impr Asmnt: 15,485
Sunnyslope Debris Basin 0 ) 21,t)40 29,828 0
--- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Total >>> 59,367
Zone 2 Improv. Balance 52,640 52,641) 1.9,2651 6,220
ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkwa,.
-------------------------------------------------------------- --- - - - - -- -----------------------------------------------------
Maintenance
----------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over 0 h
Plus Assessments 2,978 i
Budgeted Expenditures 2,978
Less Actual Expenditures 2,052
Zone 3 Maint. Balance 926 1-
441
1,436
1,009
1,405
1,405
846 >>>>>>>>>>>
1,846
2,841
1,855
,,-46
1,832
1,855
(,
1,009
0
846
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activitv
03,31/94
Page 2
F} 1993/94
FY 1994/95
FY
lY
------ -----------
- - - - --
Proposed
Description
1991/92
1992 +t
3udget Proj
Actual
Budget
FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams
Ranch Rd Barrier ** N/S Parkways ;*
S.; Parkway
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
�:,41�,
is,n85
774
8,901
Plus Assessments
5,930
4,<<.:
12,:.18
12,118
0
>>>>>>)>>>> 0
Budgeted Expenditures
5,930
>,r
3, 33
12,892
8,901
Less Actual Expenditures
3,485
8<
6,433
3,991
4,095
Zone 4 Maint. Balance
2,445
1
8,901
4,806
ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: NjS T R Rd Parkways ** S;S
Slope- **
w,S Peach Hill
Parkway
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
I14,4� '1
2,',S.)
1,670
(8,993)
Plus Assessments
24,355
40,' '
17,'40
17,340
37,338
>>>>>>>>>>> 37,338
Budgeted Expenditures
24,355
26,,xu
20,,23
19,010
28,345
Less Actual Expenditures
38,842
24,5•.,1
u,. 23
28,003
28,345
Zone 5 Maint. Balance
(14,4871
18,993)
0
ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end
of Inglewood (Glenhavenl
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
t 5
88
722
593
Plus Assessments
1,452
4
t >78
678
242
>>>>>>>>>>> 242
Budgeted Expenditures
1,452
` 4
06
1,400
835
Less Actual Expenditures
777
h6
807
835
Zone 6 Maint. Balance
675
i
593
0
ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/0 Gabbert (West America)
---------------------------------------- ------------
--
-
Maintenance
- - -
- -- ---
- - - -- -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
1
1"'18
942
(3,206)
Plus Assessments
720
3,1)87
3,087
10,581
>>>>>>>>>>> 10,581
Budgeted Expenditures
720
1 "4+
4,355
4,029
7,375
Less Actual Expenditures
0
5
4,s65
7,235
7,375
Zone 7 Maint. Balance
720
i?
(3,2061
0
EXHIBIT "C ": Zone Activity
03!31/94
Page 3
Fs 1993/94
FY 1994/95
FY
Fi
---- ------------
- - - - --
Proposed
Description
1991192
1992 a>
Budget Proj
Actual
Budget
FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
0
Plus Assessments
1,200
Mnt. Asmt: 1,200
Budgeted Expenditures
1,200
Less Actual Expenditures
1,200
Zone 8 Maint. Balance
0
Improvements
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
20,445
20,445
34,890
Plus Assessments
0
20,415
20,445
20,445
19,245
Iapr Asmnt: 19,245
Budgeted Expenditures
0
20;115
41),,190
40,890
54,135
Total: 20,445
Less Actual Expenditures
0
i,
6,000
54,135
Zone 8 Improv. Balance
0
2(;,41
4(),,, "W)
34,890
0
ZONE 9: Condor Drive ; L A Ave Parkway
------------------------------------------------------------
Maintenance
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 9 Maint. Balance
Improvements
------------------------------
Prior Year Carry Over
Plus Assessments
Budgeted Expenditures
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 9 Improv. Balance
0
0 »»» »»> 0
L
0
0
6,000 >>>>>>>>>>> 6,000
---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
6,000 Total: 6,000
6,000
0
TOTAL
FY 1994,95 Expenses ................ 144,590
FY 1994!Q1, Zone assessments ... ............................... 138,950
EXHIBIT "D"
AD84 -2 Budget
Remarks:
31- Mar -94
5 199.1
94
FY 94/95
Department
143 Budget Summary
FY 91192
FY 92;93
-- -- ---------
- - - - - --
Proposed
Actual
Actual
Budget
Proj Actual
Budget
SALARIES
& BENEFITS
13,,48
16,728
4r
20,000
22,900 1
MAINTENANCE
& OPERATIONS
II �
I!
623
Supplies
1, "26
1,617
ti(!
400
;! 550 I�
624
Postage
0
0
-00
2,025
2,100
�I
626
Printing
0
495
--
0
0 I
629
Special Supplies
0
0
0
II
637
Travel & Milage
0
0
0
0
638
Uniforms
0
0
641
Professional Services
2,958
3,267
,700
3,480
II 5,625
642
Contractual Services
93,u39
100,862
it 14
116,746
I'
133,126 1
648
Insurance
0
0
ij 0
651
Equip Maint
0
0
0
652
Utilities
215,'84
213,931
?25,,3''
221,480
II 240,465 it
654
Vehicle Maint
70
260
!)1)
135
!
.j 150 ;I
655
Fuel
1,579
2,109
JO
189
264 !!
656
Lubricants
0
0
�I
!i 0
ii
657
Small Tools
U
0
1 0
658
Maint & Repair
3,522
1,166
,`00
'792
II
:1 1,750
661
Equip Rental
0
324
x•00
342
1,750
N &O Total
-- - - - - --
318, -)78
-- - - - - --
324,031
- - - --
351+, it
--- - - - - --
345,589
�I ----- - - - - --
!! 385,780
903
Capital Projects *
U
49,235
6o,455
L25,355 *
I 222,135 * 1,
TOTAL
336,is26
389,994
1)
490,944
it 630,815 !I
*
See F.xhit it E
I
Remarks:
31- Mar -94
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 1)
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Capital Improvements
--------------------
---- - - - - --
Orlgina:
Less Est.
Balance
Acc.
F1 93%44
Year End
FY93/94
Allocated
No.
Description
#
Budget
Expenses
Adjustments
Funds
Prkwy: Millard /Los Angeles Ave
L � AO(
1
Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave
40,
t ".5n.
L A AOC
117,5001
0
2
Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra
401 �
22,000
0
3
Prkwy: W!S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
40�
0
4
Prkwy: E/S Spring S/O Pch Hill
40u
).'',Ooo
27,000
0 j
0
5
Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verd
41:
0
15,050 !
15,050
6
Prkwy: Pch Hill E!0 Mesa Verde
41,
2,450
2,450
0
7
Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejad
40�
3:ti
? 315
1
8
Prkwy Mod: T. R. Sr'O L. A. Ave
40.,
0
9
Prkwy: Princeton
41.
15,0 I
3,000
0
12,000
10
Median: Princeton
??
LS,OI�!% i
3,000
12,000
11
Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton
??
0
12
Prkwy: N/S & SiS C. P. WO Prncto
??
i
0
Unallocated
13
Prkwy: N/S I. R. Pch Hill to Sprn
41,
j
0
--
High Street Landscaping
41-
0
Sub -Total Citywide Assessments
- - - -- --
)3,8 !
--- - - - - --
57,450
---- - - - - -- j
0
------ - - - - --
46,365
Plus Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 2 [32,077 + 29,828 = 61,9051 .. ............... . .
•
. .. ............
61,905
1
Zone 8 [Design Only' ..............
...............
. ............
6,000
Total Capital Expenditures
125,355
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 2)
AD84 -2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Sunmary
Total
LESS
Capital
Improvements
Proposed
Less
----------------
- - - - --
TOTAL
--- ---------------------
-- - - --
Project
Prior
Balance
Total
Inter
FY 93/94
ADDITIONAL
Acc.
Cost
Years'
Project
FY 94/95
Project
Carry
FY 1993/94
No.
Description
I
Estimate
Expenses
Expenses
Budget
Transfer
Over
ASSESSMENT
Prkwy: Millard /Los Angeles Ave
LA AOC
I
1 0
�
0 !
0
1
Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave
404
ILA A.00
0
0
0
2
Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra
401)
22,000
22,0(1
0
0
0
0
3
Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
40;
5,000
5,0u!
0
0
0
0
4
Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill
404
27,000
27,0u
)
0
0
0
I
0
5
Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verd
41?
35,000
35,O0u
35,000
19,950
15,050
0
6
Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde
41
40,000
2.41
3 ",5' )0
0
0
0
0
7
Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejad
408
20,000
20,000
20,000
I 12,685
7,315
j 0
8
Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave
40,�
5,000
5,00
0
0
0
9
Prkwy: Princeton
41�.
40,000
3,0(x,
3 '7,01)0
37,000
25,000
12,000
I 0
10
Median: Princeton
!?
44,000
3.0i':
41,Ouu
40,000
j 28,000
12,000
0
11
Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton
??
30,000
30,Ou.-
30,000
I 30,000
0
0
12
Prkwy: NIS & S/S C. P. W /'0 Prncto
??
18,000
0
0
0
i 0
0
13
Prkwy: NIS T. R. Pch Hill to Sprn
41;
60,000
ti0,011"'
0
0
0
I 0
0
0
0
0
Sub -Total Citywide Assessments
--- - - - - --
346,000
- - - - -- -
62.4
- - - - -- --
83,5`
--- - - - - --
162,000
-- - - - - - --
I 115,635
---- - - - - --
---46,365-
---- -- -- - - --
0
-
v
6
v
City -wide Capital Improvement Funds
Avaiiable
v
FY 1993/94 Carry Over ...............
.................
46,3n5
(<,<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<M<<<<
Prior Year Reserve Allocated to
Capital
Projects
Other Surplus ......................
..............
..
Total
62,1w,
ti
Less Total Proposed City -wide Capital
Improvements
62,001
<< <.
Year End Surplus ......................
..............
..
1,,
------------------------------------------------------------
Citywide Capital Expenditurs ........
.................
- - - - -- ---------
.
-----------------------------------------------------
162,000
Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 8: Home Acres Buffer ........
..............
..
54,135
Zone 9: Virgina Colony Parkway
... ..............
..
6,000
Total
222,135
EXHIBIT 'F'
AD84 -2
FY 1994/95 Cost Analysis
Street Lighting Cost Analysis
---------------------- - - - - --
FY 1993/94 Summary
--------------------------
--------------------------
03/29/94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 1994/95 Estimate
Last Year's Cost .. ............................... 178,026.00
Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 5,340.78
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights .......... 7,000.00
Total 190,366.78
Say.... 190,000.00
Street
Traffic Signal
Date
--- - - - - --
---------
Lights
----- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
Safety Lighting
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
Total Remarks
------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------
------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------
July 1993
14,723.00
0.00
14,723.00
Aug 1993
14,790.00
0.00
14,790.00
Sept 1993
14,858.00
0.00
14,858.00
Oct 1993
14,854.00
0.00
14,854.00
Nov 1993
14,894.00
0.00
141894.00
Dec 1993
14,894.00
----- - - - - --
0.00
--- - - - - --
14,894.00
------ - - - - --
89,013.00
0.00
89,013.00 Six month cost
x2
178,026.00 Projected Annual Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 1994/95 Estimate
Last Year's Cost .. ............................... 178,026.00
Contingency for rate adjustment ............... 5,340.78
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights .......... 7,000.00
Total 190,366.78
Say.... 190,000.00
&V O C,
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -84 -2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Prepared By:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1470 S. Valley Vista Drive
Suite 140
Diamond Bar CA 91765
March 1994
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Section 1
Authority for Report 1
Section 2
Description of Improvements
to be Maintained 1
Section 3
Assessment Roll 4
Section 4
Method of Assessment 4
Section S
Estimate of Cost 6
Appendix
"A"
Street Lighting Formula - Table 1
Appendix
"B"
Landscape Formula - Table 2
Appendix
"C"
Assessment Summary - Table 3
Appendix
"D"
Budget Estimate
Appendix
"E"
Boundary Map
Appendix
"F"
Assessment Roll
Appendix
"G"
Resolutions
Appendix
"H"
Rebate Procedure
G (1)
I-)Wl(;I IT FRENC;E I & Assoc'IATES
CITY OF MOORPARK
Engineer's Report
Parks Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
For Fiscal Year 1994 -1995
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPOR'.
This report is prepared pursuant t�) City Council action taken at
their regular meeting of January 1994 to extend this District
for the fiscal year commencing , u.y 1, .1994 and ending June 30,
1995 in compliance with the requir-ments of Article 4, Chapter 1,
"Landscaping Act of 1972 ", being ? r. of Division 15 of the
California Streets and Highways Cc:xi1
The District will provide electri(�al energy for public lighting
facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting
within the City. In addition, the District will provide for
installation and /or maintenance (): puhli( landscaping within the
public right -of -way.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
This report covers the period of :uly 1, 1994 through June 30,
1995. An updated report is prepare_: each year to reflect. updated
annual costs and Chang• -s in parc-e'_ _at ion
The City of
Moorpark
Lighting Maintenance District
is proposed to
create a new
zone of
benefit for ~lit improvement and
maintenance of
the parkway
located
at the nor. t hwe. • corner of Los
Angeles Avenue
and Virginia
Colony
c l ice, whi cl: :. .1 )�- iesignat.ed
as Zone 9.
The District is also proposed t;> ,. .dn,,;e c he method of assessment
for 'Lone of benefit •1, the nort.hsici- ,f Lc:. Angeles Avenue Parkway
between Gabbert Roar: a:ld Shasta nu: , i r_;m per lot, t.o per acre
basis. The commercial area of A B(,n -':.it 8, the West, Village
Buffer Area, is exclude'. from the xun n �t eijt with the original intent.
The improvements to be mainta.inEcI iii th.s District_ include all
City -owned and Southern Califortri,. F :disor (S.C.E. ) -owned street
lights as well as al. medians .r i : :freer trees within public
rights -of -way within t.hf.° bounds i t �j• cl.ty.
C.
.t• 1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing
of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets
and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California
Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as
authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California.
Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished
by the City.
Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to,
watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree
removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth,
maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work.
In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement
will be borne by owners within that project. These easement areas
are:
1. Tract No. 2851
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the
Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the
interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 73
lots is pursuant to a condition of development.
2. Tract No. 2865
Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within
the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett &
Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill
Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett
and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at
Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon
the lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of
development.
3. Tract No. 3032
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry
monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue.
This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract.
4. Tract No. 3274
Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along
Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain
channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will
be borne by the 129 lot: within the tract.
�.1. 2
DWIGHT FRENCH I & AssocIf TH''S
5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the
west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejacia Roads with _n Tract. Nos. 3019 and 3525. The
cost is t.o he. spread r he 21" lots within the tracts.
6. Tract 3306
Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the
westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be
spread to the 22 lots wi r hin the tract.
7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway
on the north side of Lo: Angeles Avenue between Gabbert
Road and Shasta Avenue i11 be borne by all industrial
lots nort11E�rly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of
Poindexter Avenue, east e, ly of Gabbert Road, and westerly
of Shasta Avenue.
8. West Village Buffer Area
Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the
buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, and multi-
family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east,
Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west,
Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to
be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts
4340, 4341, 4342 and multifamily areas) and the
unincorporated Home Acres area.
9. Condor Drive Industrial Park
Improvement and mainten,,n,:- costs associated with the
parkway located at the i!oi t : lwest. corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and 'Jirginia n,• Place will be borne by the
developed pc:rcels with;:. T.i- lustrial Park.
Plans and specifications for tl: rr.i<Iation, landscaping and
lighting of street:, parks and ,s��iient s, and other authorized
improvements within the Cit.y arf. ),i file in the Department of
Public Works. The _ight.inc3 1.;: :t :cats and specifications for
Edison - owned lights ar•_� on file w t he Southern California Edison
Company. Reference is hereby malt• iid plans and specifications
for the exact location and natu2 t. <:: th•. landscape and lighting
improvements. Said glans and ;tt-i :c it Ions by reference are
hereby made a part of this report
C ^. 3
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment
Roll ", Exhibit "A," which will be on file in City Hall with the
City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels
are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with
Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in
the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and which are also made a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states
that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received
by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Lighting
The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience,
safety and protection of people and the security or protection of
property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree
of illumination provided can have a bearing on both.
The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit
for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family
home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has
existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the
base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to
the following types of benefit.:
People Use - People related benefits 0.50
Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25
Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25
1.00
C - 4
DWIGI IT FRENCH & Asso ,iivrES
Parcels in other land use categoric --s wer- then rated by comparison
with the basic unit. (See Table 1
People Use - People related benefits
1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human
misery.
2. Reduced vulnerability t.o criminal assault during
hours Df darkness.
3. Promotion of business operations during evening
hours.
4. Increased safety or roads and highways.
Security Benefit - Property Irotec:tion
1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and
damage to improvemE�nts.
2. Reduction in burglarie:3.
Intensity
Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets
varies with type of street, date of installation and the
use of the property adjacent. thereto.
Landscaping
The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These
benefits include aesthetic enjoyment., creation of a pleasant
living and working environment, an increase in general property
values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming
program and improved :street sweeping capabilities resulting from
trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping
operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is
spread equally along e,ich parcel in tiif t:y. This amount. is shown
in the appendix.
Rebate
The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged
property owners. The procedure shall. be followed as described in
Appendix "H."
'CZ - 5
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE
The City staff recommendation for the District budget is shown in
Appendix "D" of this report.
The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula,
and added together to constitute the total assessment for each
parcel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are
apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in
accordance with the benefits that are received.
\rpt \OSOad842.945
G.• 6
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDICES
W
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "A"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 1
Street Lighting Formula
Use
Code Description
0 Residential Vacant
1 Single Family -
Level 1
2 Mobile Home
3 Condo (Per Unit)
4 Residential Income
(2 -4 Units)
(Per Unit)
5 Apartments (5 +)
Per Unit
6 Single Family -
Level 2
9 Mobile Home &
Trailer Park
(Per Space)
10 Commercial Vacant
Land
11 Retail Stores,
Single Story
(Per Parcel)
12 Store & Office
Combination
15 Shopping Centers
(Neighborhood)
16 Shopping Centers
(Regional)
17 Office Building
(1 Story)
18 Office Building
(Multi - Story)
(Per Parcel)
19 Retail Stores
(Multi - Story)
(Per Parcel)
People
Lighting
Total
Annual
Use
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
0.00
C.00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
0.50
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.50
C.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.50
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.50
0.05
0.20
0.75
$ 15.48
0.50
0.05
0.20
0.75
$ 15.48
0.50
0 05
0.20
0.75
$ 15.48
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
2.00
1 00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
4.00
1 00
1.50
6.50
$134.16
4.00
1 00
1.50
6.50
$134.16
1.00
1 0C
1.00
3.00
$ 61.92
2.00
1 00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
2.00
1.00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
G
A -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Total
People
Code
Description
Use
21
Restaurants &
3.00
1.00
Cocktail Lounges
5.00
24
Banks, Savings &
1.00
3.00
Loans
1.00
25
Service Stations
2.00
26
Auto Sales, Repair
2.00
$ 80.64
Storage, Rental
0.25
30
Industrial land
0.00
1.00
Vacant
$103.20
31
Light
4.00
$ 80.64
Manufacturing
3.00
32
Warehousing
2.00
33
Industrial Condos,
2.00
0.25
Co -Ops, PUD's
1.00
38
Mineral Processing
1.00
44
Truck Crops
0.50
46
Pasture (Permanent)
0.50
48
Poultry
0.50
49
Flowers, Seed
0.25
1.00
Products
0.50
51
Orchards
0.50
53
Field Crops, Dry
0.50
54
Pasture of Graze,
0.25
1.00
Dry
0.50
55
Feed Lots
0.50
57
Tree Farms
0.50
61
Theater
3.00
69
Parks
0.00
70
Institutional
$ 5.16
0.00
Vacant -
0.00
71
Churches, Convent
0.00
0.00
Rectory
0.00
72
Schools
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
0.00
0.00
Museums, Firehouses,
0 00
0.25
Etc.
$ 5.16
79
Flood Control
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Lots
0.00
81
Utility Water
0.00
0.00
Company
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
1.00
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0.00
91
Utility- Edison
0.00
Lighting
Total
Annual
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
1.00
1.00
5.00
$103.20
1.00
1.00
3.00
$ 61.92
1.00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
1.00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
0.00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
1.00
1.00
5.00
$103.20
1.00
1.00
4.00
$ 80.64
1.50
1.50
5.00
$103.20
1.00
1.00
3.00
$ 61.92
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0.25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
0 25
0.25
1.00
$ 20.64
1 00
1.00
5.00
$103.20
0 00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
0.00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
0 00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0 00
0.25
0.25
$ 5.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.50
0.50
2.00
$ 41.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$ 0.00
G
A -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
People
Lighting
Total
Annual
Code
Description
Use
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
94
Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
95
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
96
County Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$
0.00
U
A -3
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Landscape Formula
The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in
accordance with the method described as follows:
Total Annual Cost = $16.40 per parcel
Notes:
1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within
Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost
for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions
of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost
per lot is $56.59. The obligation upon these lots is
pursuant to a condition of development.
2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots
within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape
charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada
Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign
within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $95.45.
The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition
of development.
3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots
within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional
landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument
at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The
additional cost per lot is $3.20.
4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots
within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional
landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of
parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison
entries within PC -3. The additional cost per lot is $0.
The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition
of development.
G
B -1
DWI(.11- T FRENCTI & ASSO(.IA FE-S
5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 217 lots
within Tract_ Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an
additional landscaping charge for maintenance of 'rierra
Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the
west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional cost per lot is
$1-72.07. The obligation upon t hF se lot s Is pursuant to a
condition of development
6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within
Tract No. 3306 are assessed in additional landscape
charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the
westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional
cost per lot. is $11.00. The obligation upon these lots
is pursuant ;.o a condit.ic ri o' development..
7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 92 lots
northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter
Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed
an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the
northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional
cost is $111.46 per acre
8. In addition to the above landscape charge, the 693
residential units within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342
are assessed an additional $14.75 per lot, for the
improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area.
The home Acres, not to be levied for any City -wide
lighting and landscape charges, are to be assessed for
$51.11 per lot for the impr-wFment and maintenance of
West Village Buffer Area.
9. In addition to the above icind::cape charge, 11 lots within
the Industrial Park on Condor Drive are assessed an
additional landscape cha:-ge for the iin_.)rovements and
maintenance of the parkway located at the northwest
corner o* Lo:; Angeles Avenue (:in,i Virginia Colony Place.
The addi t.i on<,l cost i:; ;f.n . 9,, acre.
G
B -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 3
Assessment Summary
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
0
Residential
$16.40
$ 5.16
$ 21.56
Vacant
1
Single Family -
Level 1
16.40
20.64
37.04
2
Mobile Home
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
Condo
16.40
20.64
37.04
4
Residential
Income (2 -4 Units
16.40
20.64
37.04
5
Apartments (5 +)
16.40
15.48
31.88
6
Single Family -
Level 2
16.40
15.48
31.88
9
Mobile Home and
16.40
15.48
31.88
Trailer park
10
Commercial Vacant
16.40
5.16
21.56
Land
11
Retail Stores,
16.40
80.64
97.04
Single Story
12
Store & Office
16.40
80.64
97.04
Combination
15
Shopping Centers
16.40
134.16
150.56
(Neighborhood)
16
Shopping Centers
16.40
134.16
150.56
(Regional)
17
Office Building
16.40
61.92
78.32
(1- Story)
18
Office Building
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi - Story)
19
Retail Stores
16.40
80.64
97.04
(Multi -Story
21
Restaurants &
16.40
103.20
119.60
Cocktail Lounges
24
Banks, Savings &
Loans
16.40
61.92
78.32
G
C -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
30
Industrial Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
Vacant
31
Light Manufacturing
16.40
103.20
119.60
32
Warehousing
16.40
80.64
97.04
33
Industrial Condos,
Co -Ops, PUD's
16.40
103.20
119.60
38
Mineral Processing
16.40
61.92
78.32
44
Truck Crops
16.40
20.64
37.04
46
Pasture (Permanent)
16.40
20.64
37.04
48
Poultry
16.40
20.64
37.04
49
Flowers, Seed
16.40
20.64
37.04
Production
51
Orchards
16.40
20.64
37.04
53
Field Crops, Dry
16.40
20.64
37.04
54
Pasture of Graze,
16.40
20.64
-37.04
Dry
55
Feed Lots
16.40
20.64
37.04
57
Tree Farms
16.40
20.64
37.04
61
Theater
16.40
103.20
119.60
69
Parks
0.00
0.00
0.00
70
Institutional
16.40
5.16
21.56
Vacant Land
71
Churches, Convent,
16.40
5.16
21.56
Rectory
72
Schools
0.00
0.00
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
0.00
0.00
78
Public Buildings,
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
0.00
0.00
0.00
79
Flood Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
81
Utility Water Co.
0.00
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
16.40
41.28
57.68
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
0.00
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0.00
0.00
0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.00
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
0.00
0.00
0.00
95
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
96
County Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses.
C
C -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSpCIATES
APPENDIX "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AD -84 -2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1. Tract No. 2851
SUBTOTAL $135,950.00
G
D -1
Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel
4,131.00
2.
Tract No. 2865
Pacifica & Pardee
59,367.00
3.
Tract No. 3032
Buttercreek & Peppermill
846.00
4.
Tract No. 3274
Williams Ranch Road
0.00
5.
Tract No. 3019, 3025
Warmington
37,338.00
6.
Tract No. 3306
Glenhaven (Inglewood)
242.00
7.
Los Angeles Avenue
North Side Parkway
10,581.00
8.
West Village Buffer Area
20,445.00
9.
Condor Parkway
3,000.00
SUBTOTAL $135,950.00
G
D -1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994 -95
City Wide Street Lighting $ 190,000.00
City Wide Maintenance 296,225.00
Zones of Benefit 138,590.00
Total Annual Expenses $ 624,815.00
Less City Wide Capital Improvements - (162,000.00)
Less Funds from Other Sources ( 2,640.00)
Total Amount Funded by District (FY 1994 -95) $ 460,175.00
Less Zones
of Benefit
Assessment
(135,950.00)
*Total
City Wide
Assessment
$ 324,225.00
*Actual proportion to assessed:
Street Lighting
Maintenance
$ 190,000.00
134.225.00
$ 324,225.00
C,
D -2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "E"
BOUNDARY MAPS
C•
`1 I I
. 1
► - -- •• - - -± -- -- ( - .�- •.�.'M. -.. +.. / - -1 -0 - q -ice � • -- �
f>•
4.0
1
tA
AL
f • _'I J
I ` �► � r � � 1 � 1 I
�ILn
♦
X to
I , I
»Ij M i
a I ylv
/>
Ol
nI - + --- - - - ---
I
I I I t
M t►� � >r�j1 � ^ � 1
rr ► :, i nr� � � rK� ?�'�, I ,
ox
Iz
1 % ,
N
Y'
Od
N
2
. o
N
, r
I .a
u
1
f '
WUVd
a
IY IC cc C91-
61 BI LI '
Cl O6 O8 A
K O 12
vz �,-,C Og O=
BOO
QaO O�
O�I
�O
9 O �
r I O
Cl)
Z Z O
r O
s O
GA I O
O
1£I
a Q
ry n
D i1
m
c
r-
w
O
N
C1
00
a
N
1
CD
ZONE 2 -T 2 gt 5
a
S
Cl t AD -84 -2 (Page 3 of $)
�I
y
J
LID NL a- = T• 32'14 - a
v ° a
�,,�1�JP
. N
I�
of V
-DIM
ONt. 5
"'�• 33D6
7352,5
'CIS .)LL-(Tg`b(�\l%)
L
7�
H
J
�.I
2
vi
G,: AD -84 -2 (Page 6 of g)
M
Oi
It
IV
/ I/
O
OQj.•
• � _mil_
f NI
ar o�z
J
r
I
ar Ll'
t
►mac
J �
- �r , rO •'� f � t
,Ci L ►'"r � i 4
0. r
b
\• +tea. °� .•y
r 1 J
••
`{/
\a
pi
• .1
it
,a
to
bom
i �
V
I• • ••
ar962ji
a►C0+ �� a.10�
f � � t
Cpi a •
r•�
J _`J� w•o
•n
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "F"
Appendix "F", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each
lot or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor.
The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility
easements on the Assessor's Roll
C�
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "G"
RESOLUTIONS
w
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "H"
REBATE PROCEDURE
f .V :�
JOINT NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, on April 6, 1994, adopted
Resolution No. 94- fixing the date and time of a public meeting to he held on the l6th day of May, 1994, at the hour of 7:00
p.m. in the CounciMambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said
public meeting is to allow the public an opp rtumty to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual
assessments for the 'MOORPARK LIGHTINCAND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-
84-2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1994 and ending on June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of
power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights -of -way within
the said City, to question and discuss the proposed incre-ases in said assessments over those levied for said District to FY
1993194.
PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY GIVEN that said Resolution No 94- also fixed the date and time of a public hearing
of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the Ist day of June, 1994, at the our of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider makin
certain changges in, and to order the annual assessments for the "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAR
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1994 and ending on
June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and
the landscape maintenance of public rights-of -way within the said C oN.
A coppyy of Resolution No. 94- which is captioned as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MoIRPAsRK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS iNTENTION
TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FiSCAL_ YEAR
COMMENCING JULY I, 1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 PURSUANT i'O THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC
HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THFRFTO," is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of
said Resolution is summarized as follows:
1. That the Engineer's Report prepared tot • \ssessment Ihstncf No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994195 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may he further modified of changed, pursuant to applicable State law.
3. That the amount of the assessments for Assessment Distnct No. AD84 -2 for f Y 1994;95 are proposed to increase from the
amount of lht• assessments levied for said distrct in f`Y 1993194.
4. That it is the intention of the City Council a) to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84 -2, h) to order the
extension of the annual assessment for said district for FY 1994195; and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain
improvements described herein. Said district consists of a single city -wide zone to provide electric current or energy for
public lighfin},, within the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construction or
maintenance of curb, utter, or sidewalk strictures and facilities, to install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to
any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental ex rises in
connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments for the imprmement and maintenance of the above described
landscaping and related improvements in a number of tones of henefit.
5. That said lighting and landscaping maintenance assessment district includes the li&in g and landscaping sites with all
improvements located therein, de.scrilied by and mcludcd within Assessment District No. AD 84 -2.
6. That the foregoing described work is U, he located ttiihin A.sse.ssmctit District No. AD 84 -2, the hiundary of which i,
described on a map on file in the Citv Clt -rk'. office.
7. That said proposed maintenance and unpi•ncarral is of benefit to, And expense for which are chargeable upon, the distri i.
8. That a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any, zones therein, and the
proposed assessments upon assessable parcels within said District, is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's
Report on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection.
9. That the existing assessments, the proposed assessment, and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth
in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof'
10. That a public meeting shall he convened on May 16, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark Cot}
Hall to allow the pubic an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for
Assessment District No. AD -2 for VY 1994.95. and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY
1993/94.
i1. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City Council shall be held on June I, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
at the Moorpark City Hall to consider making certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for Assessment
District No. AD84 -2 for FY 1994!95
12. That this Joint Notice of Public Meeting and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the
work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or
why said district should not he extended for the fiscal year commencins July 1, 1994 and ending June 30, 1995. Protests
must be in writing, and must he filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and
such protest shall state all grounds of the ob)mtion and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A
majority protest will cause the assessment increase to he abandoned.
13. That all the work proposed shall he done in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
14. That the City Clerk shall cause notice of said public- niecting and public hearing to he given by causing this summary of the
Resolution of Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of bivision 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of th,• Government Code of the State of California.
15. That the City Clerk shall certify to th, iui,,pti,-n .I this •esoluuon.
ATTEST:
City me Paul NV — J.awrason ayor
THiS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Landscapi , and Lighting Act of 1972, Section 22500 et. sec. of the
Streets and Highwav Code of the State of (alifomia, and is dated this 20th day of May, 1992.
itC v ZTeiTc
i
Exhibit 'A'
AD 84-2
Summary of Assessments
1 J
A. CI(_y Wide Assessments
Use
FY 1993/94
Proposed
FY 1994/95
Proposed
Code
Description
Assmnt ($).
Assmnt (S)
Increase
0
Residential Vacant
16.84
21.56
4.72
I
Single - Level 1
33.00
37.03
4.04
2
3
Mobil Home
Condo
0.00
33.00
0.00
37.03
0.00
4.04
4
Residential Income 2 -4 unit,
33.00
37.03
4.04
5
Apartments (5 +))
27.61
31.88
4.27
6
Sinbble Family - 1 evel 2
27.61
31.88
4.27
9
!vlohil Home & Trailer Park
27.61
31.88
4.27
10
Commercial Vacant
16.84
21.56
4.72
I I
12
Retail Store, sin le story
Store &
97,64
98.94
1.31
15
Office Combination
Shopping Centers (Neighborhood)
97.64
151.50
98.94
150.53
1.31
(0.97)
16
Shopping Centers (Regional)
151.5(1
150.53
(0.97)
17
Office Building (one story)
76.09
78.31
2.21
19
Office Building (multi- story)
-
97.64
98.94
1.31
19
Retail Stores (multi- story)
97.64
98.94
1.31
21
Restaurants & cocktail lounges
119. I8
1 19.58
0.40
24
Banks, Savings & Loans
7(,.09
78.31
2.22
25
Service Stations
97.64
98.94
1.31
26
Auto sales, repair, storage & rental
97.64
98.94
1.31
30
Industrial Land Vacant
16.84
21.56
4.72
31
Light Manufacturing
119.18
119.58
140
32
Warehousing
97.64
98.94
131
33
Industrial Condos, Coops, Pill)',
119.19
119.58
0.40
38
Mineral Processing
76.09
78.31
2.1_2
44
Truck Crops
33.00
37.03
4.04
46
Pasture (permanent)
33.00
37.03
4.04
48
Poultry
33.00
37.03
4.04
49
Flowers, seed production
33.00
37.03
4.04
51
Orchards
33.00
37.03
4.04
53
Field crops, dry
33.0)
37.03
4.04
54
Pastures of graze, dry
33.00
37.03
4.04
55
Feed lots
33.00
37.03
4.04
57
Tree farms
33.0)
37.03
4.04
61
70
Theater
Institutional vacant land
119.18
16.84
119.58
21.56
0.40
4.72
71
Churches, convent & rectory
16.84
21.56
4.72
78
Public Bldgs. Fire Houses, Museum' etc.
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc, Vacant land
16.84
21.56
4.72
81
Utility Water Company
0.00
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & gas
54.54
57.77
3.13
91
Utility Edison
0.00
0.00
0.(X1
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
93
SPRR
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated Community Condo Development
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
B.
Zone of Bent /r't: In addition to the Citywide Assessments listed above by
each of the Zones listed below will be assessed a per lot Zone assessment
land use categories, the properties
for the improvement and
within
maintenance
certain improvements determined to he of benefit to the properties within those Zones.
of
Propused
Zone
Descri lion
tact ertways a Bambi;
FY 1993/94
Assmnt
FY 1994/95
Assmnt
Proposed
Increase
Bellwood, Pecan and VCFCD Channel
I7777
2
Tract 2865: Parkways East side
28.41
95.45
67.04
Peach Hill, N. Side Tierra
Rejada; South slopes & Christian
Birrett and Spring
3
Tract 3072: Buttercreek Entry and
5.30
3.20
(2.10)
Peppermill parkway
4
Tract 3274: Parkways, north and
93.94
0.00
(93.94)
south side of Williams Ranch Rd.
5
Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north
79.91
172.(Yi
92.15
side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side
of Peach Hill Rd: south side parkway
& slope
6
Tract 3300 (Glenhaven): Parkway (a
30.82
11.00
(19.82)
west end of Inglewood Ave.
7
Industrial Park Northeast of Gabber•
33.55
20.06
"•
8 L.A. Ave.: Parkway North side of
to
L.A. Ave east of Gabbert
557.39
8
West Vil.age Buffer:
• City area
20.53
14.75
(5.78)
• Horn Acres
51.11
51.11
0.00
9
Condor Dive
p
' tGBiL.iY
Note: Flat Rate Assessment
��(`, AY
The total amount to be assessed
for this zone has
increased from $3,087 to
510,581. The
assessment for FY 1994/95 will be
a per acre assessment of $111.46. Depending
on the size cf
the lot, the assessment amount ranges from a low of 520.06
to a high of $557.39.
This Zone has a per acre assessment
of %60.96. Depending
on the size of the lot,
the assessment
amount ranges from a low of %54.19
to a high of %980.21.
In that this is i new zone, the entire
amount of the assessment
is an increase over last year.
wD \rot \ad85.95.nct
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR, AND DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER
THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING
JULY 1, 1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1995 PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC HEARING TO
RECEIVE OBJECTIONS THERETO.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94 -994, the City Council
ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's
Report for Assessment District 84 -2 for FY 1994/95, in
accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of
the California Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the said Engineer's
Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 1st day of April,
1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Engineer's
Report and wishes to take certain actions relative to said
report and to the levy of the assessments recommended therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2"
for the fiscal year commencinq July 1, 1994, and ending June
30, 1995, filed with the City Clerk on the 1st day of April,
1994, is hereby approved.
SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further
modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section
22630 of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 3. That the amount of the assessments for FY
1994/95 are proposed to increase over the amount of the
assessments levied in FY 1993/94.
C^ 'I"
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience
require and it is the intention of the City Council of the
City of Moorpark to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
AD -84 -2" and to order the extension of the annual assessments
for said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1994,
and ending June 30, 1995, pursuant to the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for
certain improvements as described herein, in accordance with
said Act. Said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" consists of a single city-
wide zone to provide electric current or energy for public
lighting within the City, to provide for installation or
maintenance landscaping and the construction or maintenance of
curb, gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to
install or construct facilities, which are appurtenant to any
of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both, of
any of the foregoing and to provide incidental expenses in
connection therewith. Said district also includes assessments
for the improvement and maintenance of certain improvements
within a number of Zones of Benefit.
SECTION 5. That said lighting and landscape maintenance
assessment district shall specifically include the lighting
and landscape sites with all improvements located therein,
described by and heretofore included within "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2."
SECTION 6. That the foregoing described work is to be
located within said Assessment District, the boundary of which
is more particularly described on a map on file in the City
Clerk's office, and entitled "Boundary Map, City of Moorpark
Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD- 84 -211, filed in the office of the City Clerk on the 1st of
April, 1994.
SECTION 7. That the proposed maintenance and
improvement, in the opinion of the City Council, is of benefit
to, and the City Council hereby makes the expense of said
maintenance and improvements chargeable upon the district.
SECTION 8. That a full and detailed description of the
improvements, the boundaries of the Assessment District and an
zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable
lots and parcels of land within said District, is set forth in
a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's Report, a copy of
which is on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection.
SECTION 9. That the proposed assessment amounts are set
forth in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a par hereof.
1�x '1'
Resolution No.
Page 3
SECTION 10. That a Public Meeting shall be convened on
the 16th day of May, 1994, at the hour of 7:00 p. m., in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for the purpose of allowing the
public an opportunity to meet with City staff to question and
discuss the proposed assessments for FY 1994/95.
SECTION 11. That a public hearing of the Moorpark City
Council shall be convened on the 1st day of June, 1994, at the
hour of 7:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall
of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, for
the purpose of receiving oral and written testimony regarding
the proposed assessments for FY 1994/95.
SECTION 12. That Joint Notice of said Public Meeting
and public hearing is hereby given. All persons interested in
learning more about the proposed assessments and the basis for
same, are invited to attend said Public Meeting. All persons
having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment
district may appear and show cause why said work should not be
done or carried out or why said district should not be
extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1994 and
ending June 30, 1995. Protests must be in writing, and must
be filed by the property owner with the City Clerk prior to
the conclusion of the hearing and such protest shall state all
grounds of the objection and shall contain a description
sufficient to identify the property. A majority protest will
cause the assessment increase to be abandoned.
SECTION 13. All the work herein proposed shall be done
in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,
being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California.
SECTION 14. The City Clerk shall cause a Joint Notice
of Public Meeting and public hearing to be given by causing a
summary of this Resolution to be published and mailed in the
manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and Section 54954.6 of the Government Code of
the State of California.
SECTION 15. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ _._. day of , 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor
f---Y 'I.1
Resolution No.
Exhibit 'A'
AD 84 -2 Summary of Assessments
A. City Wide Assessment
Use
Landscaping
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment_
Assessment
Assessment M
0
Residential Vacant
16.40
5.16
21.56
1
Single Family - Level 1
16.40
20.64
37.04
2
Mobil Home
0100
0.00
0.00
3
Condo (per unit)
16.40
20.64
37.04
4
Residential Income 2 -4 units (per unit)
16.40
20.64
37.04
5
Apartments (5 +) (per unit)
16.40
15.48
31.88
6
Single Family - Level 2
16.40
15.48
31.88
9
Mobil Home & Trailer Park (per space)
16.40
15.48
31.88
10
Commercial Vacant Land
16.40
5.16
21.56
11
Retail Store, single story
16.40
82.54
98.54
12
Store & Office Combination (per parcel)
16.40
82.54
98.54
15
Shopping Centers (Neighborhood)
16.40
134.13
150.53
16
Shopping Centers (Regional)
16.40
134.13
150.53
17
Office Building (one story)
16.40
61.91
78.31
18
Office Building (multi- story) (per parcel)
16.40
82.54
98.94
19
Retail Stores (multi- story) (per parcel)
16.40
82.54
98.54
21
Restaurants & cocktail lounges
16.40
103.18
119.58
24
Banks, Savings & Loans
16.40
61.91
78.31
25
Service Stations
16.40
82.54
98.54
26
Auto sales, repair, storage & rental
16.40
82.54
98.54
30
Industrial Land Vacant
16.40
5.16
21.56
31
Light Manufacturing
16.40
103.18
119.58
32
Warehousing
16.40
82.54
98.54
33
Industrial Condos, Coops, PUD's
16.40
103.18
119.58
38
Mineral Processing
16.40
61.91
78.31
44
Truck Crops
16.40
20.64
37.04
46
Pasture (permanent)
16.40
20.64
37.04
48
Poultry
16.40
20.64
37.04
49
Flowers, seed production
16.40
20.64
37.04
51
Orchards
16.40
20.64
37.04
53
Field crops, dry
16.40
20.64
37.04
54
Pastures of graze, dry
16.40
20.64
37.04
55
Feed lots
16.40
20.64
37.04
57
Tree farms
16.40
20.64
37.04
61
Theater
16.40
103.18
119.58
70
Institutional vacant land
16.40
5.16
21.56
,'1
Churches, convent & rectory
16.40
5.16
21.56
'8
Public Bldgs., Fire Houses, Museums
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc, Vacant land
16.40
5.16
21.56
81
Utility, Water Company
O.i)O
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & gas
16.40
41.27
57.6%
al
Utility Edison
)AO
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
03
SPRR
O.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated Community Condo Development
0.;. 10
0.00
0.00
G4
Exempt
1.10
0.00
0.00
E-`
�
1
_l
Exhibit 1A'(2 of 2)_
AD 84 -2 Sunary
of Assessments
B.
Zones of Benefit: In
addition to the
Citywide assessments
listed
above by land use, the
properties within
each of
the Zones listed
below will be assessed
a per lot Zone assessment
for the maintenance
of certain improvements
determined to be
of benefit
to the properties
within those zones.
Totdl
Number
Assessment Amount
Zone
Description
Assessment
of Lots
per Lot per Yr ($)
1
Tract 2851: Parkways @ Bambi;
4 131
73
56.59
Benwood, Pecan & VCFCD Channel
2
Tract 2865: Parkways East side
59 367,
622
95.45
Peach Hill, north side Tierra
Rejada; south slopes & Christian
Barrett & Spring
3
Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry and
846
265
3.20
Peppermill parkway
4
Tract 3274: Parkways, north and
)
129
0
south side of Williams Ranch Rd
5
Tracts 3019 & 3525: Parkways: north
i7 338
217
172.07
side of Tierra Rejada Road, west side
of Peach Hill Rd; south side parkway
& slope
6
Tract 3306 (Glenhaven): Parkway p
?42
22
11.00
west end of Inglewood Ave.
7
Industrial Park Northeast of Gabbert
10 "i81
92
111.46
& L. A. Ave.: Parkway North side of
per acre
L. A. Ave east of Gabbert
8
West Village Buffer:
• City area
10,.123
693
14.75
• Home Acres
;'),.'L
200
51.11
9
Condor Drive
11
60.96
per acre
T � i